This is a modern-English version of Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects, Vol. 04 (of 10): Filippino Lippi to Domenico Puligo, originally written by Vasari, Giorgio. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.



LIVES OF THE MOST EMINENT PAINTERS SCULPTORS & ARCHITECTS

BY

GIORGIO VASARI:

VOLUME IV.
FILIPPINO LIPPI TO DOMENICO PULIGO
1913

NEWLY TRANSLATED BY GASTON Du C. DE VERE. WITH FIVE HUNDRED ILLUSTRATIONS: IN TEN VOLUMES

Title page

PHILIP LEE WARNER,
PUBLISHER TO THE MEDICI SOCIETY, LIMITED
7 GRAFTON ST. LONDON, W. 1912-14

PHILIP LEE WARNER,
PUBLISHER TO THE MEDICI SOCIETY, LIMITED
7 GRAFTON ST. LONDON, W. 1912-14


[Pg v] CONTENTS OF VOLUME IV

 PAGE
Filippo Lippi, known as Filippino1
Bernardino Pinturicchio11
Francesco Francia21
Pietro Perugino [Pietro Vannucci, or Pietro da Casteldella Pieve]31
Vittore Scarpaccia [Carpaccio] and other painters from Venice and Lombardy49
Jacopo, known as L'Indaco63
Luca Signorelli [Luca from Cortona]69
The Author's Preface to the Third Part77
Leonardo da Vinci87
Giorgione from Castelfranco107
Antonio da Correggio115
Piero de' Medici123
Bramante from Urbino135
Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco [Baccio della Porta]149
Mariotto Albertinelli163
Raffaellino del Garbo173
Torrigiano181
[Pg vi] Giuliano and Antonio da San Gallo189
Raffaello Sanzio207
Guglielmo da Marcilla [Guillaume de Marcillac]251
Simone, known as Il Cronaca [Simone del Pollaiuolo]263
Domenico Puligo277
Name Index285

[Pg vii] ILLUSTRATIONS TO VOLUME IV

PLATES IN COLOUR

Filippo Lippi (Filippino) The Vision of S. Bernard Florence: Church of the Badia 2
Bernardino Pinturicchio The Madonna in Glory San Gimignano: Palazzo Pubblico 14
Benedetto Buonfiglio Madonna, Child, and Three Angels Perugia: Pinacoteca 18
Francesco Francia Pietà London: N.G., 180 26
Pietro Perugino Apollo and Marsyas Paris: Louvre, 1509 34
Pietro Perugino Triptych: The Madonna adoring, with the Archangels Michael, Raphael, and Tobit London: N.G., 288 42
Vittore Scarpaccia (Carpaccio) The Vision of S. Ursula Venice: Accademia, 578 56
Vincenzio Catena S. Jerome in his Study London: N.G., 694 58
Cima da Conegliano Detail: Tobit and the Angel Venice: Accademia, 592 58
Luca Signorelli Pan Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 79A 72
Andrea Verrocchio The Baptism in Jordan Florence: Accademia, 71 92
Leonardo da Vinci Monna Lisa (formerly) Paris: Louvre, 1601 102
Giorgione from Castelfranco Figures in a Landscape Venice: Prince Giovanelli's Collection 110
Antonio Correggio Antiope Paris: Louvre, 1118 118
Antonio da Correggio The Adoration of the Magi Milan: Brera, 427 122
Piero di Cosimo The Death of Procris London: N.G., 698 126
Fra Bartolommeo of San Marco The Deposition from the Cross Florence: Pitti, 64 152
Mariotto Albertinelli The Salutation Florence: Uffizi, 1259 168
Raphael of Urbino S. George and the Dragon S. Petersburg: Hermitage, 39 210
Raphael Angelo Doni Florence: Pitti, 61 214
Raphael of Urbino The Three Graces Chantilly, 38 242
Raphael of Urbino Baldassare Gastiglione Paris: Louvre, 1505 248

PLATES IN MONOCHROME

Filippo Lippi (Filippino) The Liberation of S. Peter Florence: S. Maria Del Carmine 6
Filippo Lippi (Filippino) S. John the Evangelist Raising Drusiana from the Dead Florence: S. Maria Novella, Strozzi Chapel 8
Filippo Lippi (Filippino) The Adoration of the Magi Florence: Uffizi, 1257 10
Bernardino Pinturicchio Frederick III Crowning the Poet Æneas Sylvius Siena: Sala Piccolominea 16
Bernardino Pinturicchio Pope Alexander VI Adoring the Risen Christ Rome: the Vatican, Borgia Apartments 16
Francesco Francia and a Student Medals London: British Museum 22
Francesco Francia Madonna and Child, With Saints Bologna: S. Giacomo Maggiore, Bentivoglio Chapel 24
Pietro Perugino The Deposition Florence: Pitti, 164 38
Pietro Perugino Christ Giving the Keys to S. Peter Rome: Sistine Chapel 40
Pietro Perugino Fortitude and Temperance, with Warriors Perugia: Collegio Del Cambio 40
Giovanni (The Spain) Madonna and Child, with Saints Assisi: Lower Church 46
Stefano from Verona (from Zevio) The Madonna and Child with S. Catharine in a Rose Garden Verona: Gallery, 559 52
Aldigieri da Zevio (Altichiero) Presentation to the Madonna of Three Knights of the Cavalli Family Verona: S. Anastasia 54
Vittore Scarpaccia (Carpaccio) S. George and the Dragon Venice: S. Giorgio Degli Schiavoni 56
Marco Bassiti (Basaiti) Christ on the Mount of Olives Venice: Accademia, 69 60
Giovanni Buonconsigli Pietà Vicenza: Pinacoteca, 22 60
Luca Signorelli Detail: The Last Judgment Orvieto: Duomo 74
Leonardo da Vinci The Adoration of the Magi Florence: Uffizi, 1252 94
Leonardo da Vinci The Last Supper Milan: S. Maria delle Grazie 96
Leonardo da Vinci Cartoon: The Madonna and Child with S. Anne London: Burlington House 98
Leonardo da Vinci (?) Fragment of Cartoon: The Battle of the Standard Oxford: Ashmolean Museum 104
Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio Man and Woman Praying Milan: Brera, 281 104
Giorgione from Castelfranco Portrait of a Young Man Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 12A 112
Giorgione of Castelfranco Judith S. Petersburg: Hermitage, 112 112
Giorgione from Castelfranco (?) Caterina, Queen of Cyprus Milan: Crespi Collection 114
Antonio Correggio Detail: S. Thomas and S. James the Less Parma: S. Giovanni Evangelista 120
Antonio da Correggio The Madonna and Child with S. Jerome Parma: Gallery, 351 120
Piero di Cosimo Perseus delivering Andromeda Florence: Uffizi, 1312 128
Piero di Cosimo Venus, Mars, and Cupid Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 107 130
Piero di Cosimo Francesco Giamberti Hague: Royal Museum, 255 134
Bramante from Urbino Interior of Sacristy Milan: S. Satiro 138
Bramante from Urbino Tempietto Rome: S. Pietro in Montorio 142
Bramante from Urbino Palazzo Giraud Rome 146
Fra Bartolommeo of San Marco The Holy Family Rome: Corsini Gallery, 579 154
Friar Bartolomeo of San Marco S. Mark Florence: Pitti, 125 158
Fra Bartolommeo of San Marco God the Father, with SS. Mary Magdalen and Catharine Lucca: Gallery, 12 160
Mariotto Albertinelli The Madonna enthroned, with Saints Florence: Accademia, 167 166
Raffaellino del Garbo The Resurrection Florence: Accademia, 90 176
[Pg x] Torrigiano Tomb of Henry VII London: Westminster Abbey 186
Giuliano da San Gallo Façade of S. Maria delle Carceri Prato 194
Raphael of Urbino Lo Sposalizio Milan: Brera, 472 212
Raphael of Urbino Maddalena Doni Florence: Pitti, 59 212
Raphael of Urbino "The School of Athens" Rome: The Vatican 216
Raphael of Urbino The "Disputa del Sacramento" Rome: The Vatican 222
Raphael of Urbino The Mass of Bolsena Rome: The Vatican 224
Raphael Pope Leo X with Two Cardinals Florence: Pitti, 40 230
Raphael of Urbino The Transfiguration Rome: The Vatican 240
Simone (The Chronicle) Detail of Cornice Florence: Palazzo Strozzi 266
Niccolò Grosso Iron Link-holder Florence: Palazzo Strozzi 268
Niccolò Grosso Iron Lantern Florence: Palazzo Strozzi 268
Simone (The Chronicle) Interior of Sacristy Florence: S. Spirito 270
Domenico Puligo (?) Madonna and Child, with Saints Florence: S. Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi 280

[Pg 1] FILIPPO LIPPI

The Vision of S. Bernard.

FILIPPO LIPPI (FILIPPINO): THE VISION OF S. BERNARD
(Florence: Church of the Badia. Panel)
View larger image

FILIPPO LIPPI (FILIPPINO): THE VISION OF S. BERNARD
(Florence: Church of the Badia. Panel)
View larger image


[Pg 3] LIFE OF FILIPPO LIPPI, CALLED FILIPPINO

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

There was at this same time in Florence a painter of most beautiful intelligence and most lovely invention, namely, Filippo, son of Fra Filippo of the Carmine, who, following in the steps of his dead father in the art of painting, was brought up and instructed, being still very young, by Sandro Botticelli, notwithstanding that his father had commended him on his death-bed to Fra Diamante, who was much his friend—nay, almost his brother. Such was the intelligence of Filippo, and so abundant his invention in painting, and so bizarre and new were his ornaments, that he was the first who showed to the moderns the new method of giving variety to vestments, and embellished and adorned his figures with the girt-up garments of antiquity. He was also the first to bring to light grotesques, in imitation of the antique, and he executed them on friezes in terretta or in colours, with more design and grace than the men before him had shown; wherefore it was a marvellous thing to see the strange fancies that he expressed in painting. What is more, he never executed a single work in which he did not avail himself with great diligence of Roman antiquities, such as vases, buskins, trophies, banners, helmet-crests, adornments of temples, ornamental head-dresses, strange kinds of draperies, armour, scimitars, swords, togas, mantles, and such a variety of other beautiful things, that we owe him a very great and perpetual obligation, seeing that he added beauty and adornment to art in this respect.

At the same time in Florence, there was a painter named Filippo, the son of Fra Filippo of the Carmine, known for his exceptional intelligence and creativity. Following in his late father’s footsteps in the art of painting, he was raised and taught at a young age by Sandro Botticelli, even though his father had entrusted him on his deathbed to his close friend, Fra Diamante, who was almost like a brother to him. Filippo was incredibly talented and inventive in painting, introducing modern techniques to make clothing more varied and enhancing his figures with the draped garments of antiquity. He was also the first to create grotesques inspired by ancient art, skillfully applying them to friezes in terracotta or color, showcasing more design and elegance than previous artists. It was truly remarkable to witness the unique ideas he portrayed in his paintings. Moreover, he never completed a single artwork without diligently drawing from Roman antiquities, using elements like vases, boots, trophies, banners, helmet crests, temple decorations, elaborate headpieces, unusual fabrics, armor, scimitars, swords, togas, mantles, and a wide variety of other exquisite items. We owe him a tremendous and lasting gratitude, as he significantly enriched the beauty and embellishment of art in this regard.

In his earliest youth he completed the Chapel of the Brancacci in the Carmine at Florence, begun by Masolino, and left not wholly finished by Masaccio on account of his death. Filippo, therefore, gave it its final [Pg 4] perfection with his own hand, and executed what was lacking in one scene, wherein S. Peter and S. Paul are restoring to life the nephew of the Emperor. In the nude figure of this boy he portrayed the painter Francesco Granacci, then a youth; and he also made portraits of the Chevalier, Messer Tommaso Soderini, Piero Guicciardini, father of Messer Francesco the historian, Piero del Pugliese, and the poet Luigi Pulci; likewise Antonio Pollaiuolo, and himself as a youth, as he then was, which he never did again throughout the whole of his life, so that it has not been possible to find a portrait of him at a more mature age. In the scene following this he portrayed Sandro Botticelli, his master, and many other friends and people of importance; among others, the broker Raggio, a man of great intelligence and wit, who executed in relief on a conch the whole Inferno of Dante, with all the circles and divisions of the pits and the nethermost well in their exact proportions, and all the figures and details that were most ingeniously imagined and described by that great poet; which conch was held in those times to be a marvellous thing.

In his early youth, he finished the Chapel of the Brancacci in the Carmine at Florence, which had been started by Masolino and left incomplete by Masaccio due to his untimely death. Filippo, therefore, completed it with his own hands, filling in the gaps in one scene where St. Peter and St. Paul are bringing the Emperor’s nephew back to life. In the nude figure of this boy, he depicted the painter Francesco Granacci, who was still a young man at the time. He also painted portraits of Chevalier Messer Tommaso Soderini, Piero Guicciardini, the father of historian Messer Francesco, Piero del Pugliese, and the poet Luigi Pulci; as well as Antonio Pollaiuolo and himself as a young man, which he never did again for the rest of his life, making it impossible to find a later portrait of him. In the following scene, he portrayed his master Sandro Botticelli and many other friends and notable figures; among them was the broker Raggio, a man of great intelligence and humor, who carved a relief on a conch shell depicting Dante’s entire Inferno, complete with all the circles and divisions of the pits and the deepest well, along with all the figures and details that were most cleverly imagined and described by that great poet; this conch was considered a marvel at the time.

Next, in the Chapel of Francesco del Pugliese at Campora, a seat of the Monks of the Badia, without Florence, he painted a panel in distemper of S. Bernard, to whom Our Lady is appearing with certain angels, while he is writing in a wood; which picture is held to be admirable in certain respects, such as rocks, books, herbage, and similar things, that he painted therein, besides the portrait from life of Francesco himself, so excellent that he seems to lack nothing save speech. This panel was removed from that place on account of the siege, and placed for safety in the Sacristy of the Badia of Florence. In S. Spirito in the same city, for Tanai de' Nerli, he painted a panel with Our Lady, S. Martin, S. Nicholas, and S. Catherine; with a panel in the Chapel of the Rucellai in S. Pancrazio, and a Crucifix and two figures on a ground of gold in S. Raffaello. In front of the Sacristy of S. Francesco, without the Porta a S. Miniato, he made a God the Father, with a number of children. At Palco, a seat of the Frati del Zoccolo, without Prato, he painted a panel; and in the Audience Chamber of the Priori in that territory he executed a little panel containing the Madonna, S. Stephen, and S. John the [Pg 5] Baptist, which has been much extolled. On the Canto al Mercatale, also in Prato, in a shrine opposite to the Nuns of S. Margherita, and near some houses belonging to them, he painted in fresco a very beautiful Madonna, with a choir of seraphim, on a ground of dazzling light. In this work, among other things, he showed art and beautiful judgment in a dragon that is at the feet of S. Margaret, which is so strange and horrible, that it is revealed to us as a true fount of venom, fire, and death; and the whole of the rest of the work is so fresh and vivacious in colouring, that it deserves infinite praise.

Next, in the Chapel of Francesco del Pugliese at Campora, a residence of the Monks of the Badia, just outside Florence, he painted a panel in distemper of St. Bernard, to whom Our Lady is appearing alongside some angels while he is writing in a wood. This painting is considered remarkable for various aspects, such as the rocks, books, greenery, and similar details that he included, as well as the lifelike portrait of Francesco himself, which is so excellent that he seems to only lack the ability to speak. This panel was moved from that location due to the siege and is now stored for safety in the Sacristy of the Badia in Florence. In St. Spirito in the same city, he painted a panel featuring Our Lady, St. Martin, St. Nicholas, and St. Catherine for Tanai de' Nerli; he also created a panel in the Chapel of the Rucellai in St. Pancrazio, and a Crucifix along with two figures on a gold background in St. Raffaello. In front of the Sacristy of St. Francesco, outside the Porta a S. Miniato, he depicted God the Father with a number of children. At Palco, a site for the Frati del Zoccolo outside Prato, he painted a panel; and in the Audience Chamber of the Priori in that area, he completed a small panel featuring the Madonna, St. Stephen, and St. John the Baptist, which has received much acclaim. On the Canto al Mercatale, also in Prato, in a shrine opposite the Nuns of St. Margherita and near some of their houses, he painted a very beautiful Madonna in fresco, accompanied by a choir of seraphim against a backdrop of dazzling light. In this work, among other things, he demonstrated skill and a keen eye for detail in the depiction of a dragon at the feet of St. Margaret, which is so unusual and terrifying that it appears as a true source of venom, fire, and death; and the rest of the work is so vibrant and lively in color that it deserves endless praise.

He also wrought certain things in Lucca, particularly a panel in a chapel of the Church of S. Ponziano, which belongs to the Monks of Monte Oliveto; in the centre of which chapel there is a niche containing a very beautiful S. Anthony in relief by the hand of Andrea Sansovino, a most excellent sculptor. Being invited to go to Hungary by King Matthias, Filippo refused, but made up for this by painting two very beautiful panels for that King in Florence, and sending them to him; and in one of these he made a portrait of the King, taken from his likeness on medals. He also sent certain works to Genoa; and beside the Chapel of the High-Altar in S. Domenico at Bologna, on the left hand, he painted a S. Sebastian on a panel, which was a thing worthy of much praise. For Tanai de' Nerli he executed another panel in S. Salvadore, without Florence; and for his friend Piero del Pugliese he painted a scene with little figures, executed with so much art and diligence that when another citizen besought him to make a second like it, he refused, saying that it was not possible to do it.

He also created several works in Lucca, especially a panel in a chapel of the Church of S. Ponziano, which belongs to the Monks of Monte Oliveto. In the center of this chapel, there’s a niche containing a beautiful relief of St. Anthony by Andrea Sansovino, a highly skilled sculptor. When invited to Hungary by King Matthias, Filippo declined but compensated by painting two stunning panels for the King in Florence and sending them to him. In one of these, he created a portrait of the King based on his likeness from medals. He also sent some works to Genoa, and next to the High Altar Chapel in S. Domenico at Bologna, on the left side, he painted a St. Sebastian on a panel, which received much praise. For Tanai de' Nerli, he made another panel in S. Salvadore, just outside Florence, and for his friend Piero del Pugliese, he painted a scene with small figures, executed with such artistry and care that when another citizen asked him to create a second one like it, he refused, saying it wasn't possible to replicate it.

After these things he executed a very great work in Rome for the Neapolitan Cardinal, Olivieri Caraffa, at the request of the elder Lorenzo de' Medici, who was a friend of that Cardinal. While going thither for that purpose, he passed through Spoleto at the wish of Lorenzo, in order to give directions for the making of a marble tomb for his father Fra Filippo at the expense of Lorenzo, who had not been able to obtain his body from the people of Spoleto for removal to Florence. Filippo, therefore, made a beautiful design for the said tomb, and Lorenzo had it [Pg 6] erected after that design (as has been told in another place), sumptuous and beautiful. Afterwards, having arrived in Rome, Filippo painted a chapel in the Church of the Minerva for the said Cardinal Caraffa, depicting therein scenes from the life of S. Thomas Aquinas, and certain most beautiful poetical compositions ingeniously imagined by himself, for he had a nature ever inclined to this. In the scene, then, wherein Faith has taken Infidelity captive, there are all the heretics and infidels. Hope has likewise overcome Despair, and so, too, there are many other Virtues that have subjugated the Vice that is their opposite. In a disputation is S. Thomas defending the Church "ex cathedra" against a school of heretics, and holding vanquished beneath him Sabellius, Arius, Averroes, and others, all clothed in graceful garments; of which scene we have in our book of drawings the original design by Filippo's own hand, with certain others by the same man, wrought with such mastery that they could not be bettered. There, too, is the scene when, as S. Thomas is praying, the Crucifix says to him, "Bene scripsisti de me, Thoma"; while a companion of the Saint, hearing that Crucifix thus speaking, is standing amazed and almost beside himself. In the panel is the Virgin receiving the Annunciation from Gabriel; and on the main wall there is her Assumption into Heaven, with the twelve Apostles round the sepulchre. The whole of this work was held, as it still is, to be very excellent and wrought perfectly for a work in fresco. It contains a portrait from life of the said Cardinal Olivieri Caraffa, Bishop of Ostia, who was buried in this chapel in the year 1511, and afterwards removed to the Piscopio in Naples.

After these things, he did a major project in Rome for the Neapolitan Cardinal, Olivieri Caraffa, at the request of the older Lorenzo de' Medici, who was friends with that Cardinal. On his way there, he stopped in Spoleto at Lorenzo's suggestion to oversee the creation of a marble tomb for his father, Fra Filippo, funded by Lorenzo. Lorenzo had been unable to collect his body from the people of Spoleto to bring it to Florence. Therefore, Filippo designed a beautiful tomb, and Lorenzo had it [Pg 6] built according to that design (as mentioned elsewhere), lavish and stunning. Once he arrived in Rome, Filippo painted a chapel in the Church of the Minerva for Cardinal Caraffa, illustrating scenes from the life of St. Thomas Aquinas, along with some beautiful poetic compositions he creatively devised, as he always had a talent for this. In the scene where Faith captures Infidelity, all the heretics and non-believers are present. Hope has also defeated Despair, and there are many other Virtues that have subdued their opposing Vices. In a discussion, St. Thomas is defending the Church "ex cathedra" against a group of heretics, holding down Sabellius, Arius, Averroes, and others, all dressed in elegant robes; we have the original design of this scene drawn by Filippo himself in our book of drawings, along with several others by him, crafted with such skill that they could not be improved. There is also the moment when, as St. Thomas prays, the Crucifix tells him, "Well written about me, Thomas"; a companion of the Saint, hearing this, stands in awe, nearly losing his composure. In the panel, the Virgin is receiving the Annunciation from Gabriel; and on the main wall, there is her Assumption into Heaven, surrounded by the twelve Apostles at the tomb. This entire work was, and still is, regarded as exceptional and flawlessly executed for a fresco. It features a life-like portrait of Cardinal Olivieri Caraffa, Bishop of Ostia, who was buried in this chapel in 1511 and later moved to Piscopio in Naples.

The Liberation of S. Peter.

THE LIBERATION OF S. PETER
(After the fresco by Filippo Lippi (Filippino).
Florence: S. Maria del Carmine)
Anderson
View larger image

THE LIBERATION OF S. PETER
(After the fresco by Filippo Lippi (Filippino).
Florence: S. Maria del Carmine)
Anderson
View larger image

Having returned to Florence, Filippo undertook to paint at his leisure the Chapel of the elder Filippo Strozzi in S. Maria Novella, and he actually began it; but, having finished the ceiling, he was compelled to return to Rome, where he wrought a tomb with stucco-work for the said Cardinal, and decorated with gesso a little chapel beside that tomb in a part of the same Church of the Minerva, together with certain figures, some of which were executed by his disciple, Raffaellino del Garbo. The chapel described above was valued by Maestro Lanzilago of Padua and by the Roman Antonio, known as Antoniasso, two of [Pg 7] the best painters that were then in Rome, at 2,000 ducats of gold, without the cost of the blues and of the assistants. Having received this sum, Filippo returned to Florence, where he finished the aforesaid Chapel of the Strozzi, which was executed so well, and with so much art and design, that it causes all who see it to marvel, by reason of the novelty and variety of the bizarre things that are seen therein—armed men, temples, vases, helmet-crests, armour, trophies, spears, banners, garments, buskins, head-dresses, sacerdotal vestments, and other things—all executed in so beautiful a manner that they deserve the highest commendation. In this work there is the scene of Drusiana being restored to life by S. John the Evangelist, wherein we see most admirably expressed the marvel of the bystanders at beholding a man restore life to a dead woman by a mere sign of the cross; and the greatest amazement of all is seen in a priest, or rather philosopher, whichever he may be, who is clothed in ancient fashion and has a vase in his hand. In the same scene, likewise, among a number of women draped in various manners, there is a little boy, who, terrified by a small spaniel spotted with red, which has seized him with its teeth by one of his swathing-bands, is running round his mother and hiding himself among her clothes, and appears to be as much afraid of being bitten by the dog as his mother is awestruck and filled with a certain horror at the resurrection of Drusiana. Next to this, in the scene where S. John himself is being boiled in oil, we see the wrath of the judge, who is giving orders for the fire to be increased, and the flames reflected on the face of the man who is blowing at them; and all the figures are painted in beautiful and varied attitudes. On the other side is S. Philip in the Temple of Mars, compelling the serpent, which has slain the son of the King with its stench, to come forth from below the altar. In certain steps the painter depicted the hole through which the serpent issued from beneath the altar, and so well did he paint the cleft in one of the steps, that one evening one of Filippo's lads, wishing to hide something, I know not what, from the sight of someone who was knocking for admittance, ran up in haste in order to conceal it in the hole, being wholly deceived by it. Filippo also showed so much art in the serpent, that its venom, fetid breath, and [Pg 8] fire, appear rather real than painted. Greatly extolled, too, is his invention in the scene of the Crucifixion of that Saint, for he imagined to himself, so it appears, that the Saint was stretched on the cross while it lay on the ground, and that afterwards the whole was drawn up and raised on high by means of ropes, cords, and poles; which ropes and cords are wound round certain fragments of antiquities, pieces of pillars, and bases, and pulled by certain ministers. On the other side the weight of the said cross and of the Saint who is stretched nude thereon is supported by two men, on the one hand by a man with a ladder, with which he is propping it up, and on the other hand by another with a pole, upholding it, while two others, setting a lever against the base and stem of the cross, are balancing its weight and seeking to place it in the hole made in the ground, wherein it had to stand upright. But why say more? It would not be possible for the work to be better either in invention or in drawing, or in any other respect whatsoever of industry or art. Besides this, it contains many grotesques and other things wrought in chiaroscuro to resemble marble, executed in strange fashion with invention and most beautiful drawing.

Having returned to Florence, Filippo took the time to paint the Chapel of the elder Filippo Strozzi in S. Maria Novella, and he actually started on it; however, after finishing the ceiling, he had to go back to Rome, where he created a tomb with stucco work for the mentioned Cardinal and decorated a small chapel next to that tomb in the same Church of the Minerva with gesso, along with certain figures, some of which were executed by his disciple, Raffaellino del Garbo. This chapel was valued by Maestro Lanzilago of Padua and the Roman Antonio, known as Antoniasso, two of the best painters in Rome, at 2,000 ducats of gold, not including the cost of the blue paints and assistants. After receiving this sum, Filippo went back to Florence, where he completed the Strozzi Chapel, which was done so well, with so much skill and design, that everyone who sees it marvels at the novelty and variety of the strange things depicted—armed men, temples, vases, helmet crests, armor, trophies, spears, banners, garments, boots, headdresses, priestly vestments, and more—all rendered so beautifully that they deserve the highest praise. In this work, there is the scene of Drusiana being brought back to life by St. John the Evangelist, where we see the amazement of the onlookers as they witness a man restore life to a dead woman with just a sign of the cross; the greatest astonishment is shown in a priest or perhaps philosopher, dressed in ancient style and holding a vase. In the same scene, among a number of women dressed in various styles, there is a little boy, frightened by a small red-spotted dog, which has bitten at one of his swaddling bands, running around his mother and hiding among her clothes, appearing as scared of being bitten by the dog as his mother is horrified by the resurrection of Drusiana. Next to this, in the scene where St. John himself is being boiled in oil, we see the judge’s anger as he orders the fire to be intensified, with the flames reflecting on the face of the man fanning them; all the figures are painted in beautiful and varied poses. On the opposite side is St. Philip in the Temple of Mars, forcing the serpent, which killed the King’s son with its stench, to come out from under the altar. In certain parts, the painter depicted the hole through which the serpent emerged, and he painted the cleft in one of the steps so convincingly that one evening, one of Filippo's boys, wanting to hide something—I'm not sure what—from someone knocking for admission, rushed over to conceal it in the hole, completely deceived by it. Filippo also demonstrated a great deal of skill in the serpent, making its venom, foul breath, and fire appear more real than painted. His creativity is likewise highly praised in the scene of St. Philip's Crucifixion, as he imagined that the Saint was stretched on the cross while it lay on the ground, and then the whole scene was lifted up high with ropes, cords, and poles; these ropes and cords are wound around fragments of antiquities, pieces of pillars, and bases, and pulled by certain assistants. On the other side, the weight of the cross and the naked Saint stretched upon it is supported by two men—one with a ladder propping it up, and the other with a pole holding it steady, while two more, using a lever against the base and stem of the cross, are balancing its weight and attempting to place it in the hole made in the ground for it to stand upright. But why say more? It would be impossible for the work to be better in invention or drawing, or in any aspect of craft or artistry. Additionally, it features many grotesques and other elements created in chiaroscuro to resemble marble, executed in a unique fashion with creativity and beautiful drawing.

S. John the Evangelist raising Drusiana from the Dead.

S. JOHN THE EVANGELIST RAISING DRUSIANA FROM THE DEAD
(After the fresco by Filippo Lippi [Filippino].
Florence: S. Maria Novella, Strozzi Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image

S. JOHN THE EVANGELIST RAISING DRUSIANA FROM THE DEAD
(After the fresco by Filippo Lippi [Filippino].
Florence: S. Maria Novella, Strozzi Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image

For the Frati Scopetini, also, at S. Donato, without Florence, which is called Scopeto and is now in ruins, he painted a panel with the Magi presenting their offerings to Christ, finished with great diligence, wherein he portrayed the elder Pier Francesco de' Medici, son of Lorenzo di Bicci, in the figure of an astrologer who is holding a quadrant in his hand, and likewise Giovanni, father of Signor Giovanni de' Medici, and another Pier Francesco, brother of that Signor Giovanni, and other people of distinction. In this work are Moors, Indians, costumes of strange shapes, and a most bizarre hut. In a loggia at Poggio a Cajano he began a Sacrifice in fresco for Lorenzo de' Medici, but it remained unfinished. And for the Nunnery of S. Geronimo, above the Costa di S. Giorgio in Florence, he began the panel of the high-altar, which was brought nearly to completion after his death by the Spaniard Alonzo Berughetta, but afterwards wholly finished by other painters, Alonzo having gone to Spain. In the Palazzo della Signoria he painted the panel of the hall where the Council of Eight held their sittings, and he made the design [Pg 9] for another large panel, with its ornament, for the Sala del Consiglio; which design his death prevented him from beginning to put into execution, although the ornament was carved; which ornament is now in the possession of Maestro Baccio Baldini, a most excellent physician of Florence, and a lover of every sort of talent. For the Church of the Badia of Florence he made a very beautiful S. Jerome; and he began a Deposition from the Cross for the high-altar of the Friars of the Nunziata, but only finished the figures in the upper half of the picture, for, being overcome by a most cruel fever and by that contraction of the throat that is commonly known as quinsy, he died in a few days at the age of forty-five.

For the Frati Scopetini, at S. Donato, outside Florence, which is called Scopeto and is now in ruins, he painted a panel of the Magi presenting their gifts to Christ, completed with great care. In it, he depicted the elder Pier Francesco de' Medici, son of Lorenzo di Bicci, as an astrologer holding a quadrant, along with Giovanni, father of Signor Giovanni de' Medici, another Pier Francesco, brother of that Signor Giovanni, and other notable figures. This work features Moors, Indians, odd costumes, and a very unusual hut. In a loggia at Poggio a Cajano, he started a fresco titled Sacrifice for Lorenzo de' Medici, but it remained unfinished. For the Nunnery of S. Geronimo, above the Costa di S. Giorgio in Florence, he began the panel for the high altar, which was almost completed after his death by the Spaniard Alonzo Berughetta, but later fully finished by other painters after Alonzo went to Spain. In the Palazzo della Signoria, he painted the panel for the hall where the Council of Eight met, and he designed [Pg 9] for another large panel with its decoration for the Sala del Consiglio; his death prevented him from starting the execution of this design, although the ornament was carved. This ornament is now in the possession of Maestro Baccio Baldini, an excellent physician of Florence and a lover of all kinds of talent. For the Church of the Badia in Florence, he created a very beautiful St. Jerome, and he started a Deposition from the Cross for the high altar of the Friars of the Nunziata, but he only finished the figures in the upper part of the painting, as he was struck down by a severe fever and a throat condition known as quinsy, dying in a few days at the age of forty-five.

Thereupon, having ever been courteous, affable, and kindly, he was lamented by all those who had known him, and particularly by the youth of his noble native city, who, in their public festivals, masques, and other spectacles, ever availed themselves, to their great satisfaction, of the ingenuity and invention of Filippo, who has never had an equal in things of that kind. Nay, he was so excellent in all his actions, that he blotted out the stain (if stain it was) left to him by his father—blotted it out, I say, not only by the excellence of his art, wherein he was inferior to no man of his time, but also by the modesty and regularity of his life, and, above all, by his courtesy and amiability; and how great are the force and power of such qualities to conciliate the minds of all men without exception, is only known to those who either have experienced or are experiencing it. Filippo was buried by his sons in S. Michele Bisdomini, on April 13, 1505; and while he was being borne to his tomb all the shops in the Via de' Servi were closed, as is done sometimes for the obsequies of great men.

After that, he was always courteous, friendly, and kind, and everyone who knew him mourned his loss, especially the young people from his distinguished hometown. They often enjoyed his creativity and talent during their public festivals, masquerades, and other events, which brought them great satisfaction, as he had no equal in those matters. In fact, he was so outstanding in everything he did that he erased the shadow (if it could even be called that) cast by his father—not just through his remarkable artistry, where he was unmatched in his time, but also through his humility and the integrity of his life, and most importantly, through his kindness and charm. The immense power of such qualities to win over everyone's hearts is something only those who have lived it or are living it truly understand. Filippo was laid to rest by his sons in S. Michele Bisdomini on April 13, 1505; and as he was carried to his grave, all the shops along the Via de' Servi closed, as is sometimes done for the funerals of great individuals.

Among the disciples of Filippo, who all failed by a great measure to equal him, was Raffaellino del Garbo, who made many works, as will be told in the proper place, although he did not justify the opinions and hopes that were conceived of him while Filippo was alive and Raffaellino himself still a young man. The fruits, indeed, are not always equal to the blossoms that are seen in the spring. Nor did any great success come to Niccolò Zoccolo, otherwise known as Niccolò Cartoni, who was likewise [Pg 10] a disciple of Filippo, and painted at Arezzo the wall that is over the altar of S. Giovanni Decollato; a little panel, passing well done, in S. Agnesa; a panel over a lavatory in the Abbey of S. Fiora, containing a Christ who is asking for water from the woman of Samaria; and many other works, which, since they were commonplace, are not mentioned.

Among Filippo's disciples, who all fell short of his greatness, was Raffaellino del Garbo, who created many works, which will be discussed later, even though he did not live up to the opinions and expectations held for him while Filippo was alive and Raffaellino was still young. The results are not always equal to the promising beginnings we see in spring. Nor did Niccolò Zoccolo, also known as Niccolò Cartoni, who was another disciple of Filippo, achieve great success; he painted the wall above the altar of S. Giovanni Decollato in Arezzo, a small panel that was fairly well done in S. Agnesa, a panel over a lavatory in the Abbey of S. Fiora featuring Christ asking for water from the Samaritan woman, and many other works, which were so ordinary that they aren't worth mentioning.

The Adoration of the Magi.

THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the panel by Filippo Lippi (Filippino).
Florence: Uffizi, 1257)
Alinari
View larger image

THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the panel by Filippo Lippi (Filippino).
Florence: Uffizi, 1257)
Alinari
View larger image


[Pg 11] BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO


[Pg 13] LIFE OF BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO

PAINTER OF PERUGIA

Even as many are assisted by fortune without being endowed with much talent, so, on the contrary, there is an infinite number of able men who are persecuted by an adverse and hostile fortune; whence it is clearly manifest that she acknowledges as her children those who depend upon her without the aid of any talent, since it pleases her to exalt by her favour certain men who would never be known through their own merit; which is seen in Pinturicchio of Perugia, who, although he made many works and was assisted by various helpers, nevertheless had a much greater name than his works deserved. However, he was a man who had much practice in large works, and ever kept many assistants to aid him in his labours. Now, having worked at many things in his early youth under his master Pietro da Perugia,[1] receiving a third of all that was earned, he was summoned to Siena by Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini to paint the library made by Pope Pius II in the Duomo of that city. It is true, indeed, that the sketches and cartoons for all the scenes that he painted there were by the hand of Raffaello da Urbino, then a youth, who had been his companion and fellow-disciple under the same Pietro, whose manner the said Raffaello had mastered very well. One of these cartoons is still to be seen at the present day in Siena, and some of the sketches, by the hand of Raffaello, are in our book.

Even though many people benefit from luck without having much talent, there are countless skilled individuals who struggle against bad luck. This clearly shows that fortune favors those who rely on her support without any talent, as she takes pleasure in promoting certain individuals who would never be recognized on their own merits. A prime example is Pinturicchio from Perugia, who, despite creating many works and having various assistants, had a much greater reputation than his artworks deserved. He was a man with extensive experience in large projects and always had many helpers to support him in his work. Early in his career, he worked on many things under his master Pietro da Perugia,[1] receiving a third of all that was earned. He was called to Siena by Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini to paint the library built by Pope Pius II in the Duomo of that city. It is true that the sketches and drawings for all the scenes he painted there were made by Raffaello da Urbino, who was a young companion and fellow student under Pietro and had mastered his style very well. One of these drawings can still be seen today in Siena, and some of the sketches by Raffaello are in our book.

The Madonna in Glory.

BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO: THE MADONNA IN GLORY
(San Gimignano. Panel)
View larger image

BERNARDINO PINTURICCHIO: THE MADONNA IN GLORY
(San Gimignano. Panel)
View larger image

Now the stories in this work, wherein Pinturicchio was aided by many pupils and assistants, all of the school of Pietro, were divided into ten pictures. In the first is painted the scene when the said Pope Pius II was born to Silvio Piccolomini and Vittoria, and was called Æneas, in [Pg 14] the year 1405, in Valdorcia, at the township of Corsignano, which is now called Pienza after the name of that Pope, who afterwards enriched it with buildings and made it a city; and in this picture are portraits from nature of the said Silvio and Vittoria. In the same is the scene when, in company with Cardinal Domenico of Capranica, he is crossing the Alps, which are covered with ice and snow, on his way to the Council of Bâle. In the second the Council is sending Æneas on many embassies—namely, to Argentina (three times), to Trent, to Constance, to Frankfurt, and to Savoy. In the third is the sending of the same Æneas by the Antipope Felix as ambassador to the Emperor Frederick III, with whom the ready intelligence, the eloquence, and the grace of Æneas found so much favour that he was given the poet's crown of laurel by Frederick himself, who made him his Protonotary, received him into the number of his friends, and appointed him his First Secretary. In the fourth he is sent by Frederick to Eugenius IV, by whom he was made Bishop of Trieste, and then Archbishop of Siena, his native city. In the fifth scene the same Emperor, who is about to come to Italy to receive the crown of Empire, is sending Æneas to Telamone, a port of the people of Siena, to meet his wife, Leonora, who was coming from Portugal. In the sixth Æneas is going to Calistus IV,[2] at the bidding of the said Emperor, to induce him to make war against the Turks; and in this part, Siena being harassed by the Count of Pittigliano and by others at the instigation of King Alfonso of Naples, that Pontiff is sending him to treat for peace. This effected, war is planned against the Orientals; and he, having returned to Rome, is made a Cardinal by the said Pontiff. In the seventh, Calistus being dead, Æneas is seen being created Supreme Pontiff, and called Pius II. In the eighth the Pope goes to Mantua for the Council about the expedition against the Turks, where the Marquis Lodovico receives him with most splendid pomp and incredible magnificence. In the ninth the same Pope is placing in the catalogue of saints—or, as the saying is, canonizing—Catherine of Siena, a holy woman and nun of the Preaching Order. In the tenth and last, while preparing a vast expedition against the Turks with the help and favour [Pg 15] of all the Christian Princes, Pope Pius dies at Ancona; and a hermit of the Hermitage of Camaldoli, a holy man, sees the soul of the said Pontiff being borne by Angels into Heaven at the very moment of his death, as may also be read. Afterwards, in the same picture, the body of the same Pope is seen being borne from Ancona to Rome by a vast and honourable company of lords and prelates, who are lamenting the death of so great a man and so rare and holy a Pontiff. The whole of this work is full of portraits from the life, so numerous that it would be a long story to recount their names; and it is all painted with the finest and most lively colours, and wrought with various ornaments of gold, and with very well designed partitions in the ceiling. Below each scene is a Latin inscription, which describes what is contained therein. In the centre of this library the said Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini, nephew of the Pope, placed the three Graces of marble, ancient and most beautiful, which are still there, and which were the first antiquities to be held in price in those times. This library, wherein are all the books left by the said Pius II, was scarcely finished, when the same Cardinal Francesco, nephew of the aforesaid Pontiff, Pius II, was created Pope, choosing the name of Pius III in memory of his uncle. Over the door of that library, which opens into the Duomo, the same Pinturicchio painted in a very large scene, occupying the whole extent of the wall, the Coronation of the said Pope Pius III, with many portraits from life; and beneath it may be read these words:

Now the stories in this work, in which Pinturicchio was assisted by many students and helpers, all from Pietro's school, are divided into ten pictures. The first depicts the scene of Pope Pius II's birth to Silvio Piccolomini and Vittoria, where he was named Æneas, in [Pg 14] the year 1405, in Valdorcia, in the town of Corsignano, which is now called Pienza in honor of that Pope, who later enhanced it with buildings and granted it city status; this picture features portraiture of Silvio and Vittoria taken from life. It also shows the moment when, accompanied by Cardinal Domenico of Capranica, he crosses the snow-and-ice-covered Alps on his way to the Council of Bâle. The second shows the Council sending Æneas on various missions—to Argentina (three times), to Trent, to Constance, to Frankfurt, and to Savoy. The third portrays Æneas being sent by the Antipope Felix as an ambassador to Emperor Frederick III, where Æneas's keen intellect, eloquence, and charm won him such favor that Frederick himself awarded him the poet's crown of laurel, made him his Protonotary, welcomed him into his circle of friends, and appointed him his First Secretary. The fourth scene displays Æneas being sent by Frederick to Eugenius IV, who appointed him Bishop of Trieste and later Archbishop of Siena, his hometown. In the fifth scene, the same Emperor, preparing to come to Italy to receive the imperial crown, sends Æneas to Telamone, a port for the people of Siena, to meet his wife, Leonora, arriving from Portugal. In the sixth, Æneas goes to Calistus IV,[2] at the order of the Emperor, to persuade him to wage war against the Turks; in this part, Siena faces threats from the Count of Pittigliano and others incited by King Alfonso of Naples, prompting the Pontiff to send him to negotiate peace. Once this is achieved, plans for war against the Orientals are made, and upon returning to Rome, he is made a Cardinal by the same Pontiff. In the seventh scene, after Calistus's death, Æneas is seen being made Supreme Pontiff and called Pius II. In the eighth, the Pope travels to Mantua for a council about the expedition against the Turks, where Marquis Lodovico receives him with great pomp and remarkable magnificence. In the ninth scene, the same Pope is seen adding Catherine of Siena, a holy woman and nun from the Preaching Order, to the list of saints—or, as it is called, canonizing her. In the tenth and final scene, while organizing a major expedition against the Turks with the support and favor [Pg 15] of Christian princes, Pope Pius dies in Ancona; a hermit from the Hermitage of Camaldoli, a holy man, witnesses the Pope’s soul being carried by angels to Heaven at the moment of his death, as is written. In the same picture, his body is shown being transported from Ancona to Rome by a large and dignified group of lords and prelates, mourning the loss of such a great and rare holy Pontiff. This entire work is filled with numerous lifelike portraits, so plentiful that listing their names would take a long time; it’s all painted in vibrant, fine colors and features various golden ornaments with well-designed partitions in the ceiling. Beneath each scene, there’s a Latin inscription describing its content. In the center of this library, the Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini, the Pope's nephew, placed three ancient and beautifully sculpted marble Graces, which remain there today and were among the first antiques valued during that time. This library, housing all the books left by Pius II, was barely completed when Cardinal Francesco, nephew of Pope Pius II, was elevated to the papacy, choosing the name Pius III in memory of his uncle. Above the door to that library, which leads into the Duomo, Pinturicchio painted a large scene, spanning the entire wall, depicting the Coronation of Pope Pius III, with many lifelike portraits; underneath, the following words can be read:

PIUS III SENENSIS, PII SECUNDI NEPOS, MDIII, SEPTEMBRIS XXI,
APERTIS ELECTUS SUFFRAGIIS, OCTAVO OCTOBRIS CORONATUS EST.

PIUS III SENENSIS, NEPHEW OF PIUS II, 1503, SEPTEMBER 21,
ELECTED WITH OPEN VOTES, CROWNED ON OCTOBER 8.

When Pinturicchio was working with Pietro Perugino and painting at Rome in the time of Pope Sixtus, he had also been in the service of Domenico della Rovere, Cardinal of San Clemente; wherefore the said Cardinal, having built a very beautiful palace in the Borgo Vecchio, charged Pinturicchio to paint the whole of it, and to make on the façade the coat of arms of Pope Sixtus, with two little boys as supporters. The same master executed certain works for Sciarra Colonna in the Palace of S. Apostolo; and no long time after—namely, in the year 1484—Innocent [Pg 16] VIII, the Genoese, caused him to paint certain halls and loggie in the Palace of the Belvedere, where, among other things, by order of that Pope, he painted a loggia full of landscapes, depicting therein Rome, Milan, Genoa, Florence, Venice, and Naples, after the manner of the Flemings; and this, being a thing not customary at that time, gave no little satisfaction. In the same place, over the principal door of entrance, he painted a Madonna in fresco. In S. Pietro, in the chapel that contains the Lance which pierced the side of Christ, he painted a panel in distemper, with the Madonna larger than life, for the said Innocent VIII; and he painted two chapels in the Church of S. Maria del Popolo, one for the aforesaid Domenico della Rovere, Cardinal of San Clemente, who was afterwards buried therein, and the other for Cardinal Innocenzio Cibo, wherein he also was afterwards buried; and in each of these chapels he portrayed the Cardinal who had caused him to paint it. In the Palace of the Pope he painted certain rooms that look out upon the courtyard of S. Pietro, the ceilings and paintings of which were renovated a few years ago by Pope Pius IV. In the same palace Alexander VI caused Pinturicchio to paint all the rooms that he occupied, together with the whole of the Borgia Tower, wherein he wrought stories of the liberal arts in one room, besides decorating all the ceilings with stucco and gold; but, since they did not then know the method of stucco-work that is now in use, the aforesaid ornaments are for the most part ruined. Over the door of an apartment in the said palace he portrayed the Signora Giulia Farnese in the countenance of a Madonna, and, in the same picture, the head of Pope Alexander in a figure that is adoring her.

When Pinturicchio was working with Pietro Perugino and painting in Rome during Pope Sixtus's time, he had also served Domenico della Rovere, Cardinal of San Clemente. Because of this, the Cardinal commissioned Pinturicchio to paint the entire beautiful palace he built in the Borgo Vecchio and to include Pope Sixtus's coat of arms on the facade, featuring two little boys as supporters. The same artist completed several works for Sciarra Colonna in the Palace of S. Apostolo, and shortly after—in 1484—Innocent VIII, from Genoa, had him paint certain halls and loggias in the Palace of the Belvedere. There, by the Pope's order, he created a loggia filled with landscapes depicting Rome, Milan, Genoa, Florence, Venice, and Naples, done in a style reminiscent of the Flemish, which was quite unique at the time and was well received. In the same place, above the main entrance, he painted a Madonna in fresco. In S. Pietro, in the chapel that holds the Lance which pierced Christ's side, he created a panel in distemper featuring a larger-than-life Madonna for Innocent VIII. He also painted two chapels in the Church of S. Maria del Popolo: one for Domenico della Rovere, who was later buried there, and the other for Cardinal Innocenzio Cibo, who was also buried there later; in each chapel, he depicted the Cardinal who commissioned the work. In the Pope's Palace, he painted several rooms overlooking the courtyard of S. Pietro, the ceilings and paintings of which were renovated a few years ago by Pope Pius IV. In the same palace, Alexander VI had Pinturicchio paint all the rooms he used, including the entire Borgia Tower, where he illustrated stories of the liberal arts in one room while decorating all the ceilings with stucco and gold. However, since they didn't know the stucco techniques we use today, most of those decorations are now ruined. Above the door of one of the apartments in that palace, he portrayed Signora Giulia Farnese with the face of a Madonna, and in the same painting, he depicted the head of Pope Alexander in a figure that is adoring her.

Bernardino was much given to making gilt ornaments in relief for his pictures, to satisfy people who had little understanding of his art with the more showy lustre that this gave them, which is a most barbarous thing in painting. Having then executed a story of S. Catherine in the said apartments, he depicted the arches of Rome in relief and the figures in painting, insomuch that, the figures being in the foreground and the buildings in the background, the things that should recede stand out more prominently than those that should strike the eye as the larger—a very grave heresy in our art.

Bernardino was really into adding gold decorations in relief to his paintings to impress people who didn't understand his art, all for a more flashy look, which is pretty crude in painting. After creating a scene of St. Catherine in those same rooms, he brought the arches of Rome into relief and painted the figures, so much so that the figures in the foreground ended up standing out more than the buildings in the background. This made what should be less visible more prominent than what should be more noticeable—a serious error in our art.

Frederick III crowning the Poet Æneas Sylvius.

FREDERICK III CROWNING THE POET ÆNEAS SYLVIUS
(After the fresco by Bernardino Pinturicchio.
Siena: Sala Piccolominea)
Brogi
View larger image

FREDERICK III CROWNING THE POET ÆNEAS SYLVIUS
(After the fresco by Bernardino Pinturicchio.
Siena: Sala Piccolominea)
Brogi
View larger image

[Pg 17] In the Castello di S. Angelo he painted a vast number of rooms with grotesques; and in the Great Tower, in the garden below, he painted stories of Pope Alexander, with portraits of the Catholic Queen, Isabella; Niccolò Orsino, Count of Pittigliano; Gianjacomo Trivulzi, and many other relatives and friends of the said Pope, in particular Cæsar Borgia and his brother and sisters, with many talented men of those times. At Monte Oliveto in Naples, in the Chapel of Paolo Tolosa, there is a panel with an Assumption by the hand of Pinturicchio. This master made an infinite number of other works throughout all Italy, which, since they are of no great excellence, and wrought in a superficial manner, I will pass over in silence. Pinturicchio used to say that a painter could only give the greatest relief to his figures when he had it in himself, without owing anything to principles or to others. He also made works in Perugia, but these were few. In the Araceli he painted the Chapel of S. Bernardino; and in S. Maria del Popolo, where, as we have said, he painted the two chapels, he made the four Doctors of the Church on the vaulting of the principal chapel.

[Pg 17] In the Castello di S. Angelo, he painted a large number of rooms with grotesques; and in the Great Tower, in the garden below, he painted stories of Pope Alexander, featuring portraits of the Catholic Queen, Isabella; Niccolò Orsino, Count of Pittigliano; Gianjacomo Trivulzi, and many other relatives and friends of the Pope, especially Cæsar Borgia and his siblings, along with many talented people of that era. At Monte Oliveto in Naples, in the Chapel of Paolo Tolosa, there is a panel with an Assumption by the hand of Pinturicchio. This master created countless other works throughout Italy, which I will skip over since they are not of great quality and were done in a superficial way. Pinturicchio used to say that a painter could only give his figures the greatest depth when he possessed it within himself, without relying on principles or others. He also did some works in Perugia, but these were few. In the Araceli, he painted the Chapel of S. Bernardino; and in S. Maria del Popolo, where, as mentioned, he painted the two chapels, he created the four Doctors of the Church on the ceiling of the main chapel.

Pope Alexander VI adoring the Risen Christ.

POPE ALEXANDER VI ADORING THE RISEN CHRIST
(After the fresco by Bernardino Pinturicchio.
Rome: The Vatican, Borgia Apartments)
Anderson
View larger image

POPE ALEXANDER VI ADORING THE RISEN CHRIST
(After the fresco by Bernardino Pinturicchio.
Rome: The Vatican, Borgia Apartments)
Anderson
View larger image

Afterwards, having reached the age of fifty-nine, he was commissioned to paint the Nativity of Our Lady on a panel in S. Francesco at Siena. To this he set his hand, and the friars assigned to him a room to live in, which they gave to him, as he wished, empty and stripped of everything, save only a huge old chest, which appeared to them too awkward to remove. But Pinturicchio, like the strange and whimsical man that he was, made such an outcry at this, and repeated it so often, that finally in despair the friars set themselves to carry it away. Now their good fortune was such, that in removing it there was broken a plank which contained 500 Roman ducats of gold; at which Pinturicchio was so displeased, and felt so aggrieved at the good luck of those poor friars, that it can hardly be imagined—nay, he took it so much to heart, being unable to get it out of his thoughts, that it was the death of him. His pictures date about the year 1513.

After reaching the age of fifty-nine, he was commissioned to paint the Nativity of Our Lady on a panel in S. Francesco in Siena. He got to work on it, and the friars gave him a room to live in, which he requested to be empty and stripped of everything except for a huge old chest that they thought was too awkward to move. But Pinturicchio, being the quirky and unpredictable person he was, complained so much about it that eventually the friars, in desperation, decided to carry it away. Their luck was such that in the process, they broke a plank that contained 500 Roman ducats of gold; this made Pinturicchio extremely unhappy and deeply disappointed at the good fortune of those poor friars—so much so that it was hard to imagine. He became so troubled by it, unable to stop thinking about it, that it eventually led to his demise. His paintings date back to around 1513.

A companion and friend of Pinturicchio, although he was a much older man, was Benedetto Buonfiglio, a painter of Perugia, who executed many works in company with other masters in the Papal Palace at [Pg 18] Rome. In the Chapel of the Signoria in Perugia, his native city, he painted scenes from the life of S. Ercolano, Bishop and Protector of that city, and in the same place certain miracles wrought by S. Louis. In S. Domenico he painted the story of the Magi on a panel in distemper, and many saints on another. In the Church of S. Bernardino he painted a Christ in the sky, with S. Bernardino himself, and a multitude below. In short, this master was in no little repute in his native city before Pietro Perugino had come to be known.

A friend and associate of Pinturicchio, although he was much older, was Benedetto Buonfiglio, a painter from Perugia. He created many works alongside other masters in the Papal Palace at [Pg 18] Rome. In the Chapel of the Signoria in Perugia, his hometown, he painted scenes from the life of S. Ercolano, the Bishop and Protector of that city, as well as certain miracles performed by S. Louis. In S. Domenico, he illustrated the story of the Magi on a panel in distemper, along with many saints on another panel. In the Church of S. Bernardino, he depicted Christ in the sky with S. Bernardino himself, surrounded by a multitude below. In short, this master was quite well-regarded in his hometown before Pietro Perugino became well-known.

Another friend of Pinturicchio, associated with him in not a few of his works, was Gerino Pistoiese, who was held to be a diligent colourist and a faithful imitator of the manner of Pietro Perugino, with whom he worked nearly up to his death. He did little work in his native city of Pistoia; but for the Company of the Buon Gesù in Borgo San Sepolcro he painted a Circumcision in oil on a panel, which is passing good. In the Pieve of the same place he painted a chapel in fresco; and on the bank of the Tiber, on the road that leads to Anghiari, he painted another chapel, also in fresco, for the Commune. And he painted still another chapel in the same place, in S. Lorenzo, an abbey of the Monks of Camaldoli. By reason of all these works he made so long a stay in the Borgo that he almost adopted it as his home. He was a sorry fellow in matters of art, labouring with the greatest difficulty, and toiling with such pains at the execution of a work, that it was a torture to him.

Another friend of Pinturicchio, who collaborated with him on several projects, was Gerino Pistoiese. He was known for being a skilled colorist and a faithful imitator of Pietro Perugino's style, working alongside him until nearly the end of his life. He did little work in his hometown of Pistoia, but for the Company of the Buon Gesù in Borgo San Sepolcro, he created an oil painting of the Circumcision on a panel, which is quite good. In the Pieve of the same town, he painted a chapel in fresco; he also painted another chapel in fresco for the Commune along the Tiber River, on the road to Anghiari. Additionally, he painted yet another chapel in S. Lorenzo, an abbey of the Monks of Camaldoli. Because of all these projects, he spent so much time in Borgo that it almost became his home. He struggled significantly in his artistic endeavors, working with great difficulty and putting so much effort into completing a piece that it often felt like torture to him.

Madonna, Child and Three Angels.

BENEDETTO BUONFIGLIO: MADONNA, CHILD AND THREE ANGELS
(Perugia: Pinacoteca. Panel)
View larger image

BENEDETTO BUONFIGLIO: MADONNA, CHILD AND THREE ANGELS
(Perugia: Pinacoteca. Panel)
View larger image

At this same time there was a painter in the city of Foligno, Niccolò Alunno, who was held to be excellent, for it was little the custom before Pietro Perugino's day to paint in oil, and many were held to be able men who did not afterwards justify this opinion. Niccolò therefore gave no little satisfaction with his works, since, although he only painted in distemper, he portrayed the heads of his figures from life, so that they appeared alive, and his manner won considerable praise. In S. Agostino at Foligno there is a panel by his hand with a Nativity of Christ, and a predella with little figures. At Assisi he painted a banner that is borne in processions, besides the panel of the high-altar in the Duomo, and another panel in S. Francesco. But the best painting that Niccolò ever did was in a chapel in the Duomo, where, among other things, there [Pg 19] is a Pietà, with two angels who are holding two torches and weeping so naturally, that I do not believe that any other painter, however excellent, would have been able to do much better. In the same place he also painted the façade of S. Maria degli Angeli, besides many other works of which there is no need to make mention, it being enough to have touched on the best. And let this be the end of the Life of Pinturicchio, who, besides his other qualities, gave no little satisfaction to many princes and lords because he finished and delivered his works quickly, which is their pleasure, although such works are perchance less excellent than those that are made slowly and deliberately.

At that time, there was a painter in the city of Foligno named Niccolò Alunno, who was considered excellent. Before Pietro Perugino’s time, it was rare to paint in oil, and many painters who were thought to be skilled later didn’t live up to that reputation. Niccolò, however, brought a lot of satisfaction with his work because, even though he only painted in distemper, he captured the likeness of his figures from real life, making them look alive, and his style received significant praise. In S. Agostino in Foligno, there’s a panel he painted featuring the Nativity of Christ, along with a predella that includes small figures. In Assisi, he painted a banner used in processions, the high altar panel in the Duomo, and another panel in S. Francesco. But the best work Niccolò ever created is in a chapel in the Duomo, where, among other things, there is a Pietà, with two angels holding torches and weeping so realistically that I doubt any other painter, no matter how skilled, could have done better. He also painted the façade of S. Maria degli Angeli and many other works, but there’s no need to mention them all since we've highlighted the best ones. And let this conclude the Life of Pinturicchio, who, alongside his other talents, pleased many princes and lords because he completed and delivered his work quickly, which they appreciated, although such pieces might be less outstanding than those created slowly and thoughtfully.


[Pg 21] FRANCESCO FRANCIA

Medals.

MEDALS
(London: British Museum)

Medals
(London: British Museum)

ULISSE MUSOTTI

3. FRANCESCO ALIDOSI

3. FRANCESCO ALIDOSI

2. Giovanni II Bentivoglio

4. BERNARDO ROSSI

4. BERNARDO ROSSI

(After Francesco Francia)

(After a pupil of Francesco Francia)

(After a student of Francesco Francia)


[Pg 23] LIFE OF FRANCESCO FRANCIA

GOLDSMITH AND PAINTER OF BOLOGNA

Francesco Francia, who was born in Bologna in the year 1450, of parents who were artisans, but honest and worthy enough, was apprenticed in his earliest boyhood to the goldsmith's art, in which calling he worked with intelligence and spirit; and as he grew up he became so well proportioned in person and appearance, and so sweet and pleasant in manner and speech, that he was able to keep the most melancholy of men cheerful and free from care with his talk; for which reason he was beloved not only by all those who knew him, but also by many Italian princes and other lords. While working as a goldsmith, then, he gave attention to design, in which he took so much pleasure, that his mind began to aspire to higher things, and he made very great progress therein, as may be seen from many works in silver that he executed in his native city of Bologna, and particularly from certain most excellent works in niello. In this manner of work he often put twenty most beautiful and well-proportioned little figures within a space no higher than the breadth of two fingers and not much more in length. He also enamelled many works in silver, which were destroyed at the time of the ruin and exile of the Bentivogli. In a word, he did everything that can be done in that art better than any other man.

Francesco Francia, born in Bologna in 1450 to honest and respectable artisan parents, started his apprenticeship in goldsmithing at a young age. He approached his craft with skill and enthusiasm, and as he matured, he became well-built and appealing in both appearance and demeanor, able to lighten the spirits of even the most somber individuals with his conversation. This made him cherished not only by those who knew him but also by numerous Italian princes and nobles. While working as a goldsmith, he also focused on design, which he enjoyed so much that he began to aim for greater achievements, making significant progress as seen in various silver works he created in Bologna, particularly notable pieces in niello. In this style, he often included twenty beautiful, well-proportioned small figures within a space just the width of two fingers and not much longer. He also enamelled many silver pieces, which were lost during the downfall and exile of the Bentivogli family. In short, he excelled in every aspect of that art better than anyone else.

But that in which he delighted above all, and in which he was truly excellent, was the making of dies for medals, wherein he was the rarest master of his day, as may be seen in some that he made with a most lifelike head of Pope Julius II, which bear comparison with those of Caradosso; not to mention that he made medals of Signor Giovanni Bentivogli, in which he appears alive, and of an infinite number of princes, [Pg 24] who would stop in Bologna on their way through the city, whereupon he would make their portraits in wax for medals, and afterwards, having finished the matrices of the dies, he would send them; for which, besides immortal fame, he also received very rich presents. As long as he lived he was ever Master of the Mint in Bologna, for which he made the stamps of all the dies, both under the rule of the Bentivogli and also during the lifetime of Pope Julius, after their departure, as is proved by the coins struck by that Pope on his entrance into the city, which had on one side his head portrayed from life, and on the other these words: BONONIA PER JULIUM A TYRANNO LIBERATA. So excellent was he held in this profession, that he continued to make the dies for the coinage down to the time of Pope Leo; and the impressions of his dies are so greatly prized, and those who have some hold them in such esteem, that money cannot buy them.

But what he loved most, and where he truly excelled, was creating dies for medals, where he was the best master of his time. This is evident in some of his works featuring a remarkably lifelike head of Pope Julius II, which can compare to those by Caradosso. He also made medals of Signor Giovanni Bentivogli, making him look alive, along with countless princes who would stop in Bologna while passing through the city. He would sculpt their portraits in wax for medals and then, after completing the dies, send them out. For this, he not only gained eternal fame but also received very generous gifts. Throughout his life, he was the Master of the Mint in Bologna, crafting the stamps for all the dies, both under the Bentivogli and during Pope Julius's reign. This is confirmed by the coins minted by that Pope upon his entry into the city, which featured his likeness on one side and the words: Bologna Freed from the Tyrant Julius on the other. He was so esteemed in this field that he continued making dies for currency until the time of Pope Leo. The impressions of his dies are so highly valued that those who possess them treasure them beyond what money can buy.

Madonna and Child, with Saints.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Francesco Francia.
Bologna: S. Giacomo Maggiore, Bentivoglio Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Francesco Francia.
Bologna: S. Giacomo Maggiore, Bentivoglio Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image

Now it came to pass that Francia, being desirous of greater glory, and having known Andrea Mantegna and many other painters who had gained wealth and honours by their art, determined to try whether he could succeed in that part of painting which had to do with colour; his drawing was already such that it could well bear comparison with theirs. Thereupon, having made arrangements to try his hand, he painted certain portraits and some little things, keeping in his house for many months men of that profession to teach him the means and methods of colouring, insomuch that, having very good judgment, he soon acquired the needful practice. The first work that he made was a panel of no great size for Messer Bartolommeo[3] Felicini, who placed it in the Misericordia, a church without Bologna; in which panel there is a Madonna seated on a throne, with many other figures, and the said Messer Bartolommeo portrayed from life. This work, which was wrought in oil with the greatest diligence, was painted by him in the year 1490; and it gave such satisfaction in Bologna, that Messer Giovanni Bentivogli, desiring to honour his own chapel, which was in S. Jacopo in that city, with works by this new painter, commissioned him to paint a panel with the Madonna in the sky, two figures on either side of her, and two angels below [Pg 25] sounding instruments; which work was so well executed by Francia, that he won from Messer Giovanni, besides praise, a most honourable present. Wherefore Monsignore de' Bentivogli, impressed by this work, caused him to paint a panel containing the Nativity of Christ, which was much extolled, for the high-altar of the Misericordia; wherein, besides the design, which is not otherwise than beautiful, the invention and the colouring are worthy of nothing but praise. In this work he made a portrait of Monsignore de' Bentivogli from the life (a very good likeness, so it is said by those who knew him), clothed in that very pilgrim's dress in which he returned from Jerusalem. He also painted a panel in the Church of the Nunziata, without the Porta di S. Mammolo, representing the Madonna receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, with two figures on either side, which is held to be a very well executed work.

Now, it happened that Francia, eager for greater fame and having met Andrea Mantegna and several other painters who had achieved wealth and recognition through their art, decided to see if he could excel in the area of painting that involved color; his drawing skills were already comparable to theirs. So, after making arrangements to practice, he painted several portraits and smaller pieces, keeping professional artists in his house for many months to teach him techniques and methods of coloring. With his good judgment, he quickly gained the necessary experience. The first work he completed was a small panel for Messer Bartolommeo Felicini, who placed it in the Misericordia, a church near Bologna. This panel features a Madonna seated on a throne, surrounded by various figures, including a portrait of Messer Bartolommeo himself. This piece, painted in oil with great care, was done in 1490, and it was so well received in Bologna that Messer Giovanni Bentivogli, wishing to honor his chapel in S. Jacopo in the city with works from this new artist, commissioned him to create a panel featuring the Madonna in the sky, two figures on either side of her, and two angels below playing instruments. Francia executed this commission so well that he earned not only praise from Messer Giovanni but also a very generous gift. Impressed by this work, Monsignore de' Bentivogli asked him to paint a panel depicting the Nativity of Christ for the high altar of the Misericordia, which was widely praised for its beautiful design, inventive composition, and exceptional coloring. In this piece, he included a portrait of Monsignore de' Bentivogli himself, depicted in the pilgrim's attire he wore upon returning from Jerusalem, which was said to be a very accurate likeness. He also painted a panel in the Church of the Nunziata, outside the Porta di S. Mammolo, showing the Madonna receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, flanked by two figures, which is regarded as a very well-executed work.

Now that Francia's works had spread his fame abroad, even as his painting in oil had brought him both profit and repute, so he determined to try whether he would succeed as well at working in fresco. Messer Giovanni Bentivogli had caused his palace to be painted by diverse masters of Ferrara and Bologna, and by certain others from Modena; but, having seen Francia's experiments in fresco, he determined that this master should paint a scene on one wall of an apartment that he occupied for his own use. There Francia painted the camp of Holofernes, guarded by various sentinels both on foot and on horseback, who were keeping watch over the pavilions; and the while that they were intent on something else, the sleeping Holofernes was seen surprised by a woman clothed in widow's garments, who, with her left hand, was holding his hair, which was wet with the heat of wine and sleep, and with her right hand she was striking the blow to slay her enemy, the while that an old wrinkled handmaid, with the true air of a most faithful slave, and with her eyes fixed on those of her Judith in order to encourage her, was bending down and holding a basket near the ground, to receive therein the head of the slumbering lover. This scene was one of the most beautiful and most masterly that Francia ever painted, but it was thrown to the ground in the destruction of that edifice at the time of the expulsion of the Bentivogli, together with another scene over that same apartment, [Pg 26] coloured to look like bronze, and representing a disputation of philosophers, which was excellently wrought, with his conception very well expressed. These works brought it about that he was loved and honoured by Messer Giovanni and all the members of his house, and, after them, by all the city.

Now that Francia's works had made him famous worldwide, and his oil paintings had brought him both profit and recognition, he decided to see if he could also succeed with fresco painting. Messer Giovanni Bentivogli had commissioned various masters from Ferrara and Bologna, along with some from Modena, to paint his palace. However, after witnessing Francia's fresco attempts, he chose this master to create a scene on one wall of a room he used personally. Francia painted the camp of Holofernes, guarded by several sentinels both on foot and horseback, who were watching over the pavilions. While they were focused elsewhere, the sleeping Holofernes was depicted being confronted by a woman dressed in widow's clothes, who was holding his hair, damp from wine and sleep, with her left hand, while preparing to strike him with her right. An old wrinkled handmaid, truly resembling a devoted servant, was leaning down, holding a basket close to the ground to catch the head of the sleeping lover, while encouraging Judith with her gaze. This scene was one of the most beautiful and skillful works that Francia ever painted, but it was destroyed when the edifice was torn down during the expulsion of the Bentivogli, along with another scene in the same room, [Pg 26] depicted in colors that resembled bronze, representing a debate among philosophers, which was expertly crafted, with a very well-expressed concept. These works earned him the love and respect of Messer Giovanni and all his family, and later, from the entire city.

In the Chapel of S. Cecilia, which is attached to the Church of S. Jacopo, he painted two scenes wrought in fresco, in one of which he made the Marriage of Our Lady with Joseph, and in the other the Death of S. Cecilia—a work held in great esteem by the people of Bologna. And, indeed, Francia gained such mastery and such confidence from seeing his works advancing towards the perfection that he desired, that he executed many pictures, of which I will make no mention, it being enough for me to point out, to all who may wish to see his works, only the best and most notable. Nor did his painting hinder him from carrying on both the Mint and his other work of making medals, as he had done from the beginning. Francia, so it is said, felt the greatest sorrow at the departure of Messer Giovanni Bentivogli, for he had received such great benefits from Messer Giovanni, that it caused him infinite grief; however, like the prudent and orderly man that he was, he kept at his work. After his parting from his patron, he painted three panels that went to Modena, in one of which there was the Baptism of Christ by S. John; in the second, a very beautiful Annunciation; and in the last, which was placed in the Church of the Frati dell' Osservanza, a Madonna in the sky with many figures.

In the Chapel of St. Cecilia, which is part of the Church of St. Jacopo, he painted two scenes in fresco. One shows the Marriage of Our Lady with Joseph, while the other depicts the Death of St. Cecilia—a work highly regarded by the people of Bologna. Indeed, Francia gained so much skill and confidence from seeing his works improve towards the perfection he aimed for that he created many paintings, and I won’t list them all; it's enough for me to mention only the best and most notable ones for those who want to see his art. His painting didn’t stop him from continuing his work at the Mint and creating medals, as he had always done. It is said that Francia felt deep sorrow at the departure of Messer Giovanni Bentivogli because he had received such significant support from him, which caused him much grief; still, being the sensible and disciplined man he was, he focused on his work. After parting with his patron, he painted three panels that went to Modena; one featured the Baptism of Christ by St. John, the second showcased a stunning Annunciation, and the last, placed in the Church of the Frati dell' Osservanza, depicted a Madonna in the sky surrounded by many figures.

Pietà.

FRANCESCO FRANCIA: PIETÀ
(London: National Gallery, 180. Panel)
View larger image

FRANCESCO FRANCIA: PIETÀ
(London: National Gallery, 180. Panel)
View larger image

The fame of so excellent a master being spread abroad by means of so many works, the cities contended with one another to obtain his pictures. Whereupon he painted a panel for the Black Friars of S. Giovanni in Parma, containing a Dead Christ in the lap of Our Lady, surrounded by many figures; which panel was universally held to be a most beautiful work; and the same friars, therefore, thinking that they had been well served, induced him to make another for a house of theirs at Reggio in Lombardy, wherein he painted a Madonna with many figures. At Cesena, likewise for the church of these friars, he executed another panel, painting therein the Circumcision of Christ, with lovely colouring. Nor [Pg 27] would the people of Ferrara consent to be left behind by their neighbours; nay, having determined to adorn their Duomo with works by Francia, they commissioned him to paint a panel, on which he made a great number of figures; and they named it the panel of Ognissanti. He painted one in S. Lorenzo at Bologna, with a Madonna, a figure on either side, and two children below, which was much extolled; and scarcely had he finished this when he had to make another in S. Giobbe, representing a Crucifixion, with that Saint kneeling at the foot of the Cross, and two figures at the sides.

The fame of such an outstanding master spread far and wide through his numerous works, leading cities to compete for his paintings. He painted a panel for the Black Friars of St. Giovanni in Parma, depicting a Dead Christ in the lap of Our Lady, surrounded by many figures; this panel was universally recognized as a beautiful work. The friars, feeling well served, persuaded him to create another piece for one of their houses in Reggio, Lombardy, where he painted a Madonna with several figures. In Cesena, he also completed another panel for the church of these friars, illustrating the Circumcision of Christ, with lovely colors. Nor would the people of Ferrara allow themselves to fall behind their neighbors; wanting to enhance their Duomo with works by Francia, they commissioned him to paint a panel filled with a large number of figures, which they called the panel of Ognissanti. He also painted one in St. Lorenzo at Bologna, featuring a Madonna, a figure on either side, and two children below, which received much praise; as soon as he finished this, he was asked to create another in St. Giobbe, representing a Crucifixion, with that Saint kneeling at the foot of the Cross and two figures on the sides.

So widely had the fame and the works of this craftsman spread throughout Lombardy, that even from Tuscany men sent for something by his hand, as they did from Lucca, whither there went a panel containing a S. Anne and a Madonna, with many other figures, and a Dead Christ above in the lap of His Mother; which work is set up in the Church of S. Fridiano, and is held in great price by the people of Lucca. For the Church of the Nunziata in Bologna he painted two other panels, which were wrought with much diligence; and in the Misericordia, likewise, without the Porta a Strà Castione, at the request of a lady of the Manzuoli family, he painted another, wherein he depicted the Madonna with the Child in her arms, S. George, S. John the Baptist, S. Stephen, and S. Augustine, with an angel below, who has his hands clasped with such grace, that he appears truly to belong to Paradise. He executed another for the Company of S. Francesco in the same city, and likewise one for the Company of S. Gieronimo. He lived in close intimacy with Messer Polo Zambeccaro, who, being much his friend, and wishing to have some memorial of him, caused him to paint a rather large picture of the Nativity of Christ, which is one of the most celebrated works that he ever made; and for this reason Messer Polo commissioned him to paint at his villa two figures in fresco, which are very beautiful. He also executed a most charming scene in fresco in the house of Messer Gieronimo Bolognino, with many varied and very beautiful figures.

So famous were the skills and works of this craftsman throughout Lombardy that even people from Tuscany requested his creations, as seen in Lucca, where a panel featuring St. Anne and a Madonna, along with various other figures and a dead Christ in His Mother’s lap, was sent. This piece is displayed in the Church of St. Fridiano and is highly valued by the people of Lucca. For the Church of the Nunziata in Bologna, he painted two additional panels with great care. In the Misericordia, just outside the Porta a Strà Castione, a lady from the Manzuoli family asked him to depict the Madonna holding the Child, along with St. George, St. John the Baptist, St. Stephen, and St. Augustine, with an angel below, hands clasped so gracefully that he truly seems to belong to Paradise. He created another piece for the Company of St. Francesco in the same city, as well as one for the Company of St. Gieronimo. He shared a close friendship with Messer Polo Zambeccaro, who, wanting a keepsake from him, had him paint a rather large picture of the Nativity of Christ, which is considered one of his most famous works. For this reason, Messer Polo also commissioned him to paint two beautiful fresco figures at his villa. Additionally, he completed a lovely fresco scene in the house of Messer Gieronimo Bolognino, filled with various beautiful figures.

All these works together had won him such veneration in that city, that he was held in the light of a god; and what made this infinitely greater was that the Duke of Urbino caused him to paint a set of horse's [Pg 28] caparisons, in which he made a vast forest of trees that had caught fire, from which there were issuing great numbers of all sorts of animals, both of the air and of the earth, and certain figures—a terrible, awful, and truly beautiful thing, which was held in no little esteem by reason of the time spent in painting the plumage of the birds, and the various sorts of terrestrial animals, to say nothing of the diversity of foliage and the variety of branches that were seen in the different trees. For this work Francia was rewarded with gifts of great value as a recompense for his labours, not to mention that the Duke ever held himself indebted to him for the praises that he received for it. Duke Guido Baldo, also, has in his guardaroba a picture of the Roman Lucretia, which he esteems very highly, by the same man's hand, together with many other pictures, of which mention will be made when the time comes.

All these works combined earned him such admiration in the city that he was regarded like a god; and what made this even more impressive was that the Duke of Urbino had him paint a set of horse [Pg 28] caparisons, where he created a massive forest of trees on fire, from which a multitude of various animals emerged, both from the air and the land, along with some figures—a terrifying, awe-inspiring, and truly beautiful sight, highly valued for the time he spent painting the birds' plumage and the different kinds of land animals, not to mention the variety of leaves and branches seen in the various trees. For this work, Francia was rewarded with valuable gifts as compensation for his efforts, and the Duke felt eternally grateful to him for the acclaim he received for it. Duke Guido Baldo also has in his collection a highly prized painting of the Roman Lucretia, created by the same artist, along with many other paintings, which will be discussed later.

After these things he painted a panel for the altar of the Madonna in SS. Vitale e Agricola; in which panel are two very beautiful angels, who are playing on the lute. I will not enumerate the pictures that are scattered throughout Bologna in the houses of gentlemen of that city, and still less the infinite number of portraits that he made from life, for it would be too wearisome. Let it be enough to say that while he was living in such glory and enjoying the fruits of his labours in peace, Raffaello da Urbino was in Rome, and all day long there flocked round him many strangers, among them many gentlemen of Bologna, eager to see his works. And since it generally comes to pass that every man extols most willingly the intellects of his native place, these Bolognese began to praise the works, the life, and the talents of Francia in the presence of Raffaello, and they established such a friendship between them with these words, that Francia and Raffaello sent letters of greeting to each other. And Francia, hearing such great praise spoken of the divine pictures of Raffaello, desired to see his works; but he was now old, and too fond of his comfortable life in Bologna. Now after this it came about that Raffaello painted in Rome for Cardinal Santi Quattro, of the Pucci family, a panel-picture of S. Cecilia, which had to be sent to Bologna to be placed in a chapel of S. Giovanni in Monte, where there is the tomb of the Blessed Elena dall' Olio. This he packed up and addressed to Francia, who, as his friend, was to have it placed on the altar of that chapel, with the [Pg 29] ornament, just as he had prepared it himself. Right readily did Francia accept this charge, which gave him a chance of seeing a work by Raffaello, as he had so much desired. And having opened the letter that Raffaello had written to him, in which he besought Francia, if there were any scratch in the work, to put it right, and likewise, as a friend, to correct any error that he might notice, with the greatest joy he had the said panel taken from its case into a good light. But such was the amazement that it caused him, and so great his marvel, that, recognizing his own error and the foolish presumption of his own rash confidence, he took it greatly to heart, and in a very short time died of grief.

After this, he painted a panel for the altar of the Madonna in SS. Vitale e Agricola. In this panel, there are two beautiful angels playing the lute. I won't list the paintings scattered throughout Bologna in the homes of the city's gentlemen, nor the countless portraits he created from life, as it would be too tedious. It's enough to say that while he was living in such glory and enjoying the rewards of his work in peace, Raffaello da Urbino was in Rome, and many strangers, including several gentlemen from Bologna, gathered around him all day to see his artworks. Since it's common for people to proudly talk about the talents of their hometown, the Bolognese began to praise Francia's work, life, and skills in front of Raffaello, leading to a friendship between them, and they exchanged letters of greeting. Hearing the great praise for Raffaello's divine paintings, Francia longed to see his works; however, he was now old and too fond of his comfortable life in Bologna. Subsequently, Raffaello painted a panel picture of St. Cecilia in Rome for Cardinal Santi Quattro from the Pucci family, which was to be sent to Bologna to be placed in a chapel of St. Giovanni in Monte, where the tomb of the Blessed Elena dall’ Olio is located. He packed it up and addressed it to Francia, who was to have it placed on the altar of that chapel, complete with the [Pg 29] ornament, just as Raffaello had prepared it. Francia gladly accepted this responsibility as it gave him the opportunity he had long desired to see a work by Raffaello. After opening Raffaello's letter, which asked him to fix any scratches on the work and to correct any mistakes he might find as a friend, Francia was filled with joy and took the panel out of its case into good light. But he was so astonished by it and so amazed that, recognizing his own mistakes and the foolish overconfidence he had shown, he took it deeply to heart and soon died of grief.

Raffaello's panel was divine, not so much painted as alive, and so well wrought and coloured by him, that among all the beautiful pictures that he painted while he lived, although they are all miraculous, it could well be called most rare. Wherefore Francia, half dead with terror at the beauty of the picture, which lay before his eyes challenging comparison with those by his own hand that he saw around him, felt all confounded, and had it placed with great diligence in that chapel of S. Giovanni in Monte for which it was destined; and taking to his bed in a few days almost beside himself, thinking that he was now almost of no account in his art in comparison with the opinion held both by himself and by others, he died of grief and melancholy, so some believe, overtaken by the same fate, through contemplating too attentively that most lifelike picture of Raffaello's, as befell Fivizzano from feasting his eyes with his own beautiful Death, about which the following epigram was written:

Raffaello's panel was divine, not just painted but alive, so skillfully created and colored by him that among all the beautiful works he created during his lifetime, even though they are all extraordinary, this one could be called the most exceptional. Therefore, Francia, almost paralyzed with fear at the beauty of the piece that lay before him, challenging him to compare it with his own works surrounding him, felt completely overwhelmed. He had it carefully placed in the chapel of S. Giovanni in Monte, where it was meant to go; and within a few days, he took to his bed, almost out of his mind, believing that he had become insignificant in his art compared to how highly he and others regarded Raffaello's work. Some say he died from grief and melancholy, overtaken by the same fate as Fivizzano, who was consumed by gazing at his own beautiful Death, which inspired the following epigram:

Me veram pictor divinus mente recepit;
Admota est operi deinde perita manus.
Dumque opere in facto defigit lumina pictor,
Intentus nimium, palluit et moritur.
Viva igitur sum mors, non mortua mortis imago,
Si fungor quo mors fungitur officio.

Me, a divine painter, captured in my mind;
Then a skilled hand was brought to the task.
And while the painter focuses intently on the work,
So completely absorbed, I grow pale and feel like I'm dying.
Therefore, I am life itself, not a lifeless image of death,
If I take on the role that death does.

However, certain others say that his death was so sudden, that from many symptoms it appeared to be due rather to poison or apoplexy than to anything else. Francia was a prudent man, most regular in his way of life, and very robust. After his death, in the year 1518, he was honourably buried by his sons in Bologna.

However, some say that his death was so sudden that many signs suggested it was due more to poisoning or a stroke than anything else. Francia was a careful man, very consistent in his lifestyle, and quite strong. After his death in 1518, his sons gave him an honorable burial in Bologna.


[Pg 31] PIETRO PERUGINO


[Pg 33] LIFE OF PIETRO PERUGINO

[PIETRO VANNUCCI, OR PIETRO DA CASTEL DELLA PIEVE]

PAINTER

How great a benefit poverty may be to men of genius, and how potent a force it may be to make them become excellent—nay, perfect—in the exercise of any faculty whatsoever, can be seen clearly enough in the actions of Pietro Perugino, who, flying from the extremity of distress at Perugia, and betaking himself to Florence in the desire to attain to some distinction by means of his talent, remained for many months without any other bed than a miserable chest to sleep in, turning night into day, and devoting himself with the greatest ardour to the unceasing study of his profession. And, having made a habit of this, he knew no other pleasure than to labour continually at his art, and to be for ever painting; for with the fear of poverty constantly before his eyes, he would do for gain such work as he would probably not have looked at if he had possessed the wherewithal to live. Riches, indeed, might perchance have closed the path on which his talent should advance towards excellence, no less effectually than poverty opened it to him, while necessity spurred him on in his desire to rise from so low and miserable a condition, if not to supreme eminence, at least to a rank in which he might have the means of life. For this reason he never took heed of cold, of hunger, of hardship, of discomfort, of fatigue, or of ridicule, if only he might one day live in ease and repose; ever saying, as it were by way of proverb, that after bad weather there must come the good, and that during the good men build the houses that are to shelter them when there is need.

How beneficial poverty can be for talented individuals, and how powerful it can be in pushing them to become exceptional—maybe even perfect—in their skills, is clearly illustrated in the life of Pietro Perugino. He fled from extreme hardship in Perugia and went to Florence, hoping to achieve recognition through his talent. For many months, he had no bed other than a rickety chest to sleep on, turning night into day and dedicating himself passionately to the relentless study of his craft. Having gotten used to this lifestyle, he found no joy other than working hard on his art and painting endlessly; the constant fear of poverty motivated him to take on projects he likely wouldn’t have considered if he had the financial means to live comfortably. Indeed, wealth could have obstructed his path to excellence just as effectively as poverty opened it, as necessity drove him to aspire to rise from such a lowly state, if not to the highest peaks, at least to a position where he could maintain a decent living. For this reason, he disregarded cold, hunger, hardship, discomfort, fatigue, or mockery, as long as it meant he might one day enjoy a life of comfort and rest. He often said, almost like a proverb, that after bad weather, good times must follow, and that during the good times, people build the homes they will need in times of trouble.

Apollo and Marsyas.

PIETRO PERUGINO: APOLLO AND MARSYAS
(Paris: Louvre, 1509. Panel)
View larger image

PIETRO PERUGINO: APOLLO AND MARSYAS
(Paris: Louvre, 1509. Panel)
View larger image

But in order that the rise of this craftsman may be better known, let me begin with his origin, and relate that, according to common report, [Pg 34] there was born in the city of Perugia, to a poor man of Castello della Pieve, named Cristofano, a son who was baptized with the name of Pietro. This son, brought up amid misery and distress, was given by his father as a shop-boy to a painter of Perugia, who was no great master of his profession, but held in great veneration both the art and the men who were excellent therein; nor did he ever cease to tell Pietro how much gain and honour painting brought to those who practised it well, and he would urge the boy to the study of that art by recounting to him the rewards won by ancient and modern masters; wherefore he fired his mind in such a manner, that Pietro took it into his head to try, if only fortune would assist him, to become one of these. For this reason he was often wont to ask any man whom he knew to have seen the world, in what part the best craftsmen in that calling were formed; particularly his master, who always gave him one and the same answer—namely, that it was in Florence more than in any other place that men became perfect in all the arts, especially in painting, since in that city men are spurred by three things. The first is censure, which is uttered freely and by many, seeing that the air of that city makes men's intellects so free by nature, that they do not content themselves, like a flock of sheep, with mediocre works, but ever consider them with regard to the honour of the good and the beautiful rather than out of respect for the craftsman. The second is that, if a man wishes to live there, he must be industrious, which is naught else than to say that he must continually exercise his intelligence and his judgment, must be ready and adroit in his affairs, and, finally, must know how to make money, seeing that the territory of Florence is not so wide or abundant as to enable her to support at little cost all who live there, as can be done in countries that are rich enough. The third, which is perchance no less potent than the others, is an eager desire for glory and honour, which is generated mightily by that air in the men of all professions; and this desire, in all persons of spirit, will not let them stay content with being equal, much less inferior, to those whom they see to be men like themselves, although they may recognize them as masters—nay, it forces them very often to desire their own advancement so eagerly, that, if they are not kindly or wise by nature, they turn out [Pg 35] evil-speakers, ungrateful, and unthankful for benefits. It is true, indeed, that when a man has learnt there as much as suffices him, he must, if he wishes to do more than live from day to day like an animal, and desires to become rich, take his departure from that place and find a sale abroad for the excellence of his works and for the repute conferred on him by that city, as the doctors do with the fame derived from their studies. For Florence treats her craftsmen as time treats its own works, which when perfected, it destroys and consumes little by little.

But to better understand how this craftsman rose to fame, let me start with his background and share that, according to common belief, [Pg 34] a boy named Pietro was born in the city of Perugia to a poor man from Castello della Pieve named Cristofano. This boy, raised in hardship and struggle, was given by his father as an apprentice to a painter in Perugia who was not an exceptional artist but highly respected the craft and those who excelled in it. He constantly told Pietro about the wealth and respect that painting could bring to those who mastered it, encouraging the boy to pursue the art by sharing stories of the successes achieved by both ancient and contemporary artists. This inspired Pietro to aspire to become one of them, hoping that luck would be on his side. For this reason, he frequently asked anyone he knew who had traveled about where the best artisans in this field were trained; particularly his master, who consistently gave him the same answer—namely, that Florence was the best place to achieve mastery in all arts, especially painting, as men there are driven by three factors. The first is criticism, which is freely expressed by many, as the atmosphere of that city stimulates people’s minds to the extent that they refuse to settle, like a herd of sheep, for mediocre work. Instead, they evaluate everything in terms of excellence and beauty rather than out of respect for the creator. The second factor is that if someone wants to survive there, they must be hardworking, meaning they need to consistently exercise their intellect and judgment, be quick and skillful in their endeavors, and ultimately know how to earn a living, since Florence isn’t so expansive or resource-rich that it can support everyone at low cost, unlike wealthier regions. The third factor, which may be just as powerful as the others, is a strong desire for glory and recognition, driven by this environment in individuals of all professions. This drive compels those with ambition to not rest easy being equal, let alone inferior, to those they see as their peers, even if they acknowledge them as masters. Often, this leads them to pursue their own advancement so fervently that, if they lack kindness or wisdom by nature, they become bitter, ungrateful, and fail to appreciate the help they receive. It’s true that when someone has learned enough there, if they want to do more than just survive like an animal and aim to be wealthy, they must leave that place to seek opportunities abroad for their skills and the reputation they’ve gained from that city, much like doctors do with the recognition they earn from their studies. For Florence treats its craftsmen as time treats its creations, which it gradually destroys and consumes once perfected.

Moved by these counsels, therefore, and by the persuasions of many others, Pietro came to Florence, minded to become excellent; and well did he succeed, for the reason that in those times works in his manner were held in very great price. He studied under the discipline of Andrea Verrocchio, and his first figures were painted without the Porta a Prato, in the Nunnery of S. Martino, now in ruins by reason of the wars. In Camaldoli he made a S. Jerome on a wall, which was then much esteemed by the Florentines and celebrated with great praise, for the reason that he made that Saint old, lean, and emaciated, with his eyes fixed on the Crucifix, and so wasted away, that he seems like an anatomical model, as may be seen from a copy of that picture which is in the hands of the aforesaid Bartolommeo Gondi. In a few years, then, he came into such credit, that his works filled not only Florence and all Italy, but also France, Spain, and many other countries to which they were sent. Wherefore, his paintings being held in very great price and repute, merchants began to buy them up wholesale and to send them abroad to various countries, to their own great gain and profit.

Moved by this advice and the encouragement of many others, Pietro went to Florence, determined to excel; and he did succeed, because during that time, works in his style were highly valued. He studied under Andrea Verrocchio, and his first figures were painted outside the Porta a Prato, in the Nunnery of S. Martino, which is now in ruins due to wars. In Camaldoli, he painted a S. Jerome on a wall, which was greatly admired by the Florentines and received much praise, because he depicted that Saint as old, thin, and gaunt, with his eyes fixed on the Crucifix, so emaciated that he looks like an anatomical model, as seen in a copy of that painting held by Bartolommeo Gondi. In just a few years, he gained such recognition that his works filled not only Florence and all of Italy but also France, Spain, and many other countries where they were sent. As a result, his paintings became very valuable and sought after, prompting merchants to buy them up in bulk and send them to various countries, earning themselves significant profits.

For the Nuns of S. Chiara he painted a Dead Christ on a panel, with such lovely and novel colouring, that he made the craftsmen believe that he would become excellent and marvellous. In this work there are seen some most beautiful heads of old men, and likewise certain figures of the Maries, who, having ceased to weep, are contemplating the Dead Jesus with extraordinary awe and love; not to mention that he made therein a landscape that was then held most beautiful, because the true method of making them, such as it appeared later, had not yet been seen. It is said that Francesco del Pugliese offered to give to the aforesaid nuns [Pg 36] three times as much money as they had paid to Pietro, and to have a similar one made for them by the same man's hand, but that they would not consent, because Pietro said that he did not believe he could equal it.

For the nuns of S. Chiara, he painted a Dead Christ on a panel, using such beautiful and unique colors that he convinced the craftsmen he would become outstanding and amazing. In this artwork, there are some really beautiful heads of old men, as well as figures of the Maries, who, having stopped weeping, are gazing at the Dead Jesus with incredible awe and love; not to mention that he created a landscape that was considered very beautiful at the time, since the true technique for making them, as it later appeared, had not yet been seen. It's said that Francesco del Pugliese offered to pay the nuns [Pg 36] three times what they had paid Pietro to have a similar piece made by the same artist, but they refused because Pietro claimed he didn't think he could match it.

There were also many things by the hand of Pietro in the Convent of the Frati Gesuati, without the Porta a Pinti; and since the said church and convent are now in ruins, I do not wish, with this occasion, and before I proceed further with this Life, to grudge the labour of giving some little account of them. This church, then, the architect of which was Antonio di Giorgio of Settignano, was forty braccia long and twenty wide. At the upper end one ascended by four treads, or rather steps, to a platform six braccia in extent, on which stood the high-altar, with many ornaments carved in stone; and on the said altar was a panel with a rich ornament, by the hand, as has been related, of Domenico Ghirlandajo. In the centre of the church was a partition-wall, with a door wrought in open-work from the middle upwards, on either side of which was an altar, while over either altar, as will be told, there stood a panel by the hand of Pietro Perugino. Over the said door was a most beautiful Crucifix by the hand of Benedetto da Maiano, with a Madonna on one side and a S. John on the other, both in relief. Before the said platform of the high-altar, and against the said partition-wall, was a choir of the Doric Order, very well wrought in walnut-wood; and over the principal door of the church there was another choir, which rested on well-strengthened woodwork, with the under part forming a ceiling, or rather soffit, beautifully partitioned, and with a row of balusters acting as parapet to the front of the choir, which faced towards the high-altar. This choir was very convenient to the friars of that convent for holding their night services, for saying their individual prayers, and likewise for week-days. Over the principal door of the church—which was made with most beautiful ornaments of stone, and had a portico in front raised on columns, which made a covered way as far as the door of the convent—was a lunette with a very beautiful figure of S. Giusto, the Bishop, and an angel on either side, by the hand of the illuminator Gherardo; and this because that church was dedicated to the said S. Giusto, and within it those friars preserved a relic of that Saint—that is, an arm. At the [Pg 37] entrance of the convent was a little cloister of exactly the same size as the church—namely, forty braccia long and twenty wide—with arches and vaulting going right round and supported by columns of stone, thus making a spacious and most commodious loggia on every side. In the centre of the court of this cloister, which was all neatly paved with squared stone, was a very beautiful well, with a loggia above, which likewise rested on columns of stone, and made a rich and beautiful ornament. In this cloister were the chapter-house of the friars, the side-door of entrance into the church, and the stairs that ascended to the dormitory and other rooms for the use of the friars. On the farther side of this cloister, in a straight line with the principal door of the convent, was a passage as long as the chapter-house and the steward's room put together, leading into another cloister larger and more beautiful than the first; and the whole of this straight line—that is, the forty braccia of the loggia of the first cloister, the passage, and the line of the second cloister—made a very long enfilade, more beautiful than words can tell, and the rather as from that farther cloister, in the same straight line, there issued a garden-walk two hundred braccia in length; and all this, as one came from the principal door of the convent, made a marvellous view. In the said second cloister was a refectory, sixty braccia long and eighteen wide, with all those well-appointed rooms, and, as the friars call them, offices, which were required in such a convent. Over this was a dormitory in the shape of a T, one part of which—namely, the principal part in the direct line, which was sixty braccia long—was double—that is to say, it had cells on either side, and at the upper end, in a space of fifteen braccia, was an oratory, over the altar of which there was a panel by the hand of Pietro Perugino; and over the door of this oratory was another work by the same man's hand, in fresco, as will be told. And on the same floor, above the chapter-house, was a large room where those fathers worked at making glass windows, with the little furnaces and other conveniences that were necessary for such an industry; and since while Pietro lived he made the cartoons for many of their works, those that they executed in his time were all excellent. Then the garden of this convent was so beautiful and so well [Pg 38] kept, and the vines were trained round the cloister and in every place with such good order, that nothing better could be seen in the neighbourhood of Florence. In like manner the room wherein they distilled scented waters and medicines, as was their custom, had all the best conveniences that could possibly be imagined. In short, that convent was one of the most beautiful and best appointed that there were in the State of Florence; and it is for this reason that I have wished to make this record of it, and the rather as the greater part of the pictures that were therein were by the hand of our Pietro Perugino.

There were also many creations by Pietro in the Convent of the Frati Gesuati, located near Porta a Pinti. Since this church and convent are now in ruins, I want to take a moment, before moving on with this Life, to give a brief account of them. This church, designed by Antonio di Giorgio from Settignano, was forty braccia long and twenty wide. At the upper end, one would ascend four steps to a platform six braccia wide, on which stood the high altar, adorned with many carved stone decorations. On this altar was a panel, richly decorated, created by Domenico Ghirlandajo, as previously mentioned. In the center of the church was a partition wall, with an open-work door in the upper part. On either side of this wall was an altar, each featuring a panel created by Pietro Perugino. Above the door was a beautiful Crucifix crafted by Benedetto da Maiano, with a Madonna on one side and St. John on the other, both in relief. In front of the altar's platform, against the partition wall, was a choir in the Doric Order, finely crafted from walnut wood; above the main door of the church was another choir supported by strong wooden beams, with the underneath section acting as a ceiling or soffit, beautifully designed, and featuring a row of balusters serving as a parapet facing the high altar. This choir was very useful for the friars for their night services, personal prayers, and weekday worship. Over the main door of the church—decorated with beautiful stone ornaments, and with a portico in front held up by columns that led to the convent door—was a lunette featuring a lovely image of St. Giusto, the Bishop, with an angel on either side, created by the illuminator Gherardo; this was because the church was dedicated to St. Giusto, and within it, the friars kept a relic of the Saint—specifically, an arm. At the [Pg 37] entrance of the convent was a small cloister that matched the church's size—forty braccia long and twenty wide—with arches and vaults surrounding it, supported by stone columns, creating spacious and comfortable loggias all around. In the center of the courtyard of this cloister, which was neatly paved with squared stone, was a beautiful well, topped with a loggia also resting on stone columns, adding a lovely ornament to the area. This cloister contained the chapter house for the friars, the side door leading to the church, and the stairs that led up to the dormitory and other rooms for the friars' use. On the other side of this cloister, aligned with the main door of the convent, was a passage as long as the chapter house and the steward's room combined, leading into another cloister that was larger and more beautiful than the first. This straight line—that is, the forty braccia of the loggia from the first cloister, the passage, and the length of the second cloister—created a stunning perspective, especially since from this second cloister, a garden walk extended two hundred braccia long; all of this made a remarkable view as you arrived from the main door of the convent. In this second cloister was a refectory, sixty braccia long and eighteen wide, alongside all the well-furnished rooms, or "offices," that were typically needed in such a convent. Above this was a dormitory shaped like a T, with the main part running sixty braccia long and featuring cells on either side. At the upper end, within a space of fifteen braccia, was an oratory, above the altar of which was a panel done by Pietro Perugino; there was also another fresco by him above the door of this oratory. On the same floor, above the chapter house, was a large room where the fathers worked on making stained glass windows, complete with furnaces and other necessary facilities for this craft; since Pietro created the designs for many of their works while he was alive, all those completed during his time were excellent. The convent's garden was beautifully maintained, with vines trained around the cloister and in every corner so well that nothing better could be found in the Florence area. Additionally, the room where they distilled scented waters and medicines was equipped with all the best conveniences imaginable. In short, that convent was one of the most beautiful and well-appointed in the State of Florence; and for this reason, I wanted to record it, especially since the majority of the artworks within were by our Pietro Perugino.

The Deposition.

THE DEPOSITION
(After the panel by Pietro Perugino.
Florence: Pitti, 164)
Anderson
View larger image

THE DEPOSITION
(After the panel by Pietro Perugino.
Florence: Pitti, 164)
Anderson
View larger image

Returning at length to this Pietro, I have to say that of the works that he made in the said convent none have been preserved save the panels, since those executed in fresco were thrown to the ground, together with the whole of that building, by reason of the siege of Florence, when the panels were carried to the Porta a S. Pier Gattolini, where a home was given to those friars in the Church and Convent of S. Giovannino. Now the two panels on the aforesaid partition-wall were by the hand of Pietro; and in one was Christ in the Garden, with the Apostles sleeping, in whom Pietro showed how well sleep can prevail over pains and discomforts, having represented them asleep in attitudes of perfect ease. In the other he made a Pietà—that is, Christ in the lap of Our Lady—surrounded by four figures no less excellent than any others in his manner; and, to mention only one thing, he made the Dead Christ all stiffened, as if He had been so long on the Cross that the length of time and the cold had reduced Him to this; wherefore he painted Him supported by John and the Magdalene, all sorrowful and weeping. In another panel he painted the Crucifixion, with the Magdalene, and, at the foot of the Cross, S. Jerome, S. John the Baptist, and the Blessed Giovanni Colombini, founder of that Order; all with infinite diligence. These three panels have suffered considerably, and they are all cracked in the dark parts and where there are shadows; and this comes to pass when the first coat of colour, which is laid on the ground (for three coats of colour are used, one over the other), is worked on before it is thoroughly dry; wherefore afterwards, with time, in the drying, they draw through their thickness and come to have the strength to make those cracks; which Pietro could [Pg 39] not know, seeing that in his time they were only just beginning to paint well in oil.

Returning at last to Pietro, I have to say that of the works he created in the convent, none have survived except for the panels. The frescoes were destroyed, along with the entire building, during the siege of Florence, while the panels were taken to the Porta a S. Pier Gattolini, where the friars were given shelter in the Church and Convent of S. Giovannino. The two panels on the aforementioned wall were painted by Pietro; one depicts Christ in the Garden, with the Apostles asleep, showing how deeply sleep can overcome suffering, as he portrayed them nestled in restful positions. In the other, he created a Pietà—Christ resting on Our Lady’s lap—surrounded by four figures, each just as masterfully rendered as the others; notably, he depicted the Dead Christ as stiffened, as if He had been on the Cross long enough for time and cold to take their toll, illustrating Him supported by John and Magdalene, both sorrowful and weeping. In another panel, he painted the Crucifixion, featuring Magdalene, and at the foot of the Cross, S. Jerome, S. John the Baptist, and Blessed Giovanni Colombini, the founder of that Order, all depicted with incredible diligence. These three panels have suffered greatly, showing cracks in the dark areas and where shadows fall; this typically occurs when the initial layer of color, which requires three layers in total, is worked on before fully drying. Consequently, over time, as they dry, they contract in thickness, leading to cracks. Pietro couldn’t have known this, as during his time they were just beginning to master oil painting.

Now, the works of Pietro being much commended by the Florentines, a Prior of the same Convent of the Ingesuati, who took delight in art, caused him to make a Nativity, with the Magi, on a wall in the first cloister, after the manner of a miniature. This he brought to perfect completion with great loveliness and a high finish, and it contained an infinite number of different heads, many of them portrayed from life, among which was the head of Andrea del Verrocchio, his master. In the same court, over the arches of the columns, he made a frieze with heads of the size of life, very well executed, among which was one of the said Prior, so lifelike and wrought in so good a manner, that it was judged by the most experienced craftsmen to be the best thing that Pietro ever made. In the other cloister, over the door that led into the refectory, he was commissioned to paint a scene of Pope Boniface confirming the habit of his Order to the Blessed Giovanni Colombino, wherein he portrayed eight of the aforesaid friars, and made a most beautiful view receding in perspective, which was much extolled, and rightly, since Pietro made a particular profession of this. In another scene below the first he began a Nativity of Christ, with certain angels and shepherds, wrought with the freshest colouring. And in an arch over the door of the aforesaid oratory he made three half-length figures—Our Lady, S. Jerome, and the Blessed Giovanni—with so beautiful a manner, that this was held to be one of the best mural paintings that Pietro ever wrought.

Now, Pietro's work received a lot of praise from the Florentines, and a Prior from the same Convent of the Ingesuati, who loved art, had him create a Nativity scene with the Magi on a wall in the first cloister, done in a miniature style. He completed it beautifully and with a high level of detail, featuring countless different faces, many of which were based on real people, including a likeness of his master, Andrea del Verrocchio. In the same courtyard, above the arches of the columns, he painted a frieze with life-sized heads that were very well crafted, including one of the Prior himself, so lifelike and skillfully done that the most experienced craftsmen considered it the best piece Pietro ever created. In the other cloister, above the door that led to the refectory, he was commissioned to paint a scene of Pope Boniface confirming the habit of his Order to Blessed Giovanni Colombino, portraying eight of the mentioned friars, and he created a beautiful perspective view that received much praise, rightly so, since Pietro specialized in this technique. In another scene below, he started a Nativity of Christ, featuring angels and shepherds painted with vibrant colors. Above the door of the mentioned oratory, he made three half-length figures—Our Lady, St. Jerome, and Blessed Giovanni—crafted so beautifully that it was regarded as one of the best mural paintings Pietro ever made.

The said Prior, so I once heard tell, was very excellent at making ultramarine blues, and, therefore, having an abundance of them, he desired that Pietro should use them freely in all the above-mentioned works; but he was nevertheless so mean and suspicious that he would never trust Pietro, and always insisted on being present when he was using blue in the work. Wherefore Pietro, who had an honest and upright nature, and had no desire for another man's goods save in return for his own labour, took the Prior's distrust very ill, and resolved to put him to shame; and so, having taken a basin of water, and having laid [Pg 40] on the ground for draperies or for anything else that he wished to paint in blue and white, from time to time he caused the Prior, who turned grudgingly to his little bag, to put some ultramarine into the little vase that contained the tempera-water, and then, setting to work, at every second stroke of the brush Pietro would dip his brush in the basin, so that there remained more in the water than he had used on the picture. The Prior, who saw his little bag becoming empty without much to show for it in the work, kept saying time after time: "Oh, what a quantity of ultramarine this plaster consumes!" "Does it not?" Pietro would answer. After the departure of the Prior, Pietro took the ultramarine from the bottom of the basin, and gave it back to him when he thought the time had come, saying: "Father, this is yours; learn to trust honest men, who never cheat those who trust them, although, if they wished, they could cheat such distrustful persons as yourself."

The Prior, as I once heard, was really good at making ultramarine blue. Because he had plenty of it, he wanted Pietro to use it freely in all the works mentioned earlier. However, he was so stingy and suspicious that he wouldn’t trust Pietro and insisted on being there whenever blue was used. As a result, Pietro, who was honest and upright and didn’t want anything that belonged to another person without earning it through his own work, took the Prior's lack of trust very poorly and decided to embarrass him. So, he got a basin of water and placed [Pg 40] on the ground for draperies or anything else he wanted to paint in blue and white. From time to time, he made the Prior, who reluctantly came to his little bag, put some ultramarine into the small vase with the tempera-water. Then, as he worked, with every second brushstroke, Pietro dipped his brush in the basin, so there was always more in the water than he had used on the painting. The Prior, seeing his little bag getting empty with little to show for it, kept saying, “Wow, this plaster uses up a lot of ultramarine!” “Does it?” Pietro replied. After the Prior left, Pietro took the ultramarine from the bottom of the basin and returned it to him when he thought the time was right, saying, “Father, this is yours; learn to trust honest people, who never cheat those who trust them, even though, if they wanted to, they could easily cheat someone as distrustful as you.”

By reason of these works, then, and many others, Pietro came into such repute that he was almost forced to go to Siena, where he painted a large panel, which was held very beautiful, in S. Francesco; and he painted another in S. Agostino, containing a Crucifix with some saints. A little time after this, for the Church of S. Gallo in Florence, he painted a panel-picture of S. Jerome in Penitence, which is now in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, where the aforesaid friars live, near the Canto degli Alberti. He was commissioned to paint a Dead Christ, with the Madonna and S. John, above the steps of the side-door of S. Pietro Maggiore; and this he wrought in such a manner, that it has been preserved, although exposed to rain and wind, as fresh as if it had only just been finished by Pietro's hand. Truly intelligent was Pietro's understanding of colour, both in fresco and in oil; wherefore all experienced craftsmen are indebted to him, for it is through him that they have knowledge of the lights that are seen throughout his works.

Because of these works and many others, Pietro gained such a reputation that he was almost compelled to go to Siena, where he painted a large panel that was considered very beautiful in S. Francesco; he also painted another in S. Agostino, featuring a Crucifix with some saints. Shortly after, for the Church of S. Gallo in Florence, he created a panel painting of S. Jerome in Penitence, which is now in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, where the aforementioned friars reside, near the Canto degli Alberti. He was commissioned to paint a Dead Christ, along with the Madonna and S. John, above the steps of the side door of S. Pietro Maggiore; and he did it in such a way that it has been preserved, even though exposed to rain and wind, as vibrant as if it had just been finished by Pietro's hand. Pietro had a truly impressive understanding of color, both in fresco and in oil; therefore, all experienced craftsmen owe him a debt, as it is through him that they have learned about the lighting seen throughout his works.

Christ giving the Keys to S. Peter.

CHRIST GIVING THE KEYS TO S. PETER
(After the fresco by Pietro Perugino.
Rome: Sistine Chapel)
Alinari
View larger image

CHRIST GIVING THE KEYS TO S. PETER
(After the fresco by Pietro Perugino.
Rome: Sistine Chapel)
Alinari
View larger image

In S. Croce, in the same city, he made a Pietà—that is, Our Lady with the Dead Christ in her arms—and two figures, which are marvellous to behold, not so much for their excellence, as for the fact that they have remained so fresh and vivid in colouring, painted as they are in fresco. He was commissioned by Bernardino de' Rossi, a citizen of [Pg 41] Florence, to paint a S. Sebastian to be sent into France, the price agreed on being one hundred gold crowns; but this work was sold by Bernardino to the King of France for four hundred gold ducats. At Vallombrosa he painted a panel for the high-altar; and in the Certosa of Pavia, likewise, he executed a panel for the friars of that place. At the command of Cardinal Caraffa of Naples he painted an Assumption of Our Lady, with the Apostles marvelling round the tomb, for the high-altar of the Piscopio; and for Abbot Simone de' Graziani of Borgo a San Sepolcro he executed a large panel, which was painted in Florence, and then borne to S. Gilio in the Borgo on the shoulders of porters, at very great expense. To S. Giovanni in Monte at Bologna he sent a panel with certain figures standing upright, and a Madonna in the sky.

In S. Croce, in the same city, he created a Pietà—that is, Our Lady holding the Dead Christ in her arms—and two figures that are stunning to see, not just for their quality, but because they have remained so fresh and vibrant in color, being painted in fresco. He was commissioned by Bernardino de' Rossi, a citizen of [Pg 41] Florence, to paint a S. Sebastian to be sent to France, with an agreed price of one hundred gold crowns; however, Bernardino sold this work to the King of France for four hundred gold ducats. At Vallombrosa, he painted a panel for the high altar; and in the Certosa of Pavia, he also created a panel for the friars there. At the request of Cardinal Caraffa of Naples, he painted an Assumption of Our Lady, with the Apostles marveling around the tomb, for the high altar of the Piscopio; and for Abbot Simone de' Graziani of Borgo a San Sepolcro, he completed a large panel, which was painted in Florence and then carried to S. Gilio in the Borgo on the shoulders of porters, at a very high cost. To S. Giovanni in Monte at Bologna, he sent a panel featuring several upright figures and a Madonna in the sky.

Fortitude and Temperance, with Warriors.

FORTITUDE AND TEMPERANCE, WITH WARRIORS
(After the fresco by Pietro Perugino.
Perugia: Collegio del Cambio)
Alinari
View larger image

FORTITUDE AND TEMPERANCE, WITH WARRIORS
(After the fresco by Pietro Perugino.
Perugia: Collegio del Cambio)
Alinari
View larger image

Thereupon the fame of Pietro spread so widely throughout Italy and abroad, that to his great glory he was summoned to Rome by Pope Sixtus IV to work in his chapel in company with the other excellent craftsmen. There, in company with Don Bartolommeo della Gatta, Abbot of S. Clemente at Arezzo, he painted the scene of Christ giving the keys to S. Peter; and likewise the Nativity and Baptism of Christ, and the Birth of Moses, with the daughter of Pharaoh finding him in the little ark. And on the same wall where the altar is he painted a mural picture of the Assumption of Our Lady, with a portrait of Pope Sixtus on his knees. But these works were thrown to the ground in preparing the wall for the Judgment of the divine Michelagnolo, in the time of Pope Paul III. On a vault of the Borgia Tower in the Papal Palace he painted certain stories of Christ, with some foliage in chiaroscuro, which had an extraordinary name for excellence in his time. In S. Marco, likewise in Rome, he painted a story of two martyrs beside the Sacrament—one of the best works that he made in Rome. For Sciarra Colonna, also, in the Palace of S. Apostolo, he painted a loggia and certain rooms.

Then Pietro's fame spread widely throughout Italy and beyond, so much so that he was invited to Rome by Pope Sixtus IV to work in his chapel with other skilled artists. There, along with Don Bartolommeo della Gatta, Abbot of S. Clemente in Arezzo, he painted the scene of Christ handing the keys to S. Peter, as well as the Nativity and Baptism of Christ, and the story of Moses being found in the little basket by Pharaoh's daughter. On the same wall where the altar is located, he created a mural of the Assumption of Our Lady, featuring a portrait of Pope Sixtus on his knees. Unfortunately, these works were destroyed while preparing the wall for Michelangelo's Judgment during the time of Pope Paul III. In the Borgia Tower of the Papal Palace, he painted several stories of Christ, along with some foliage in chiaroscuro, which were renowned for their excellence at the time. In S. Marco, also in Rome, he portrayed the story of two martyrs beside the Sacrament—one of his best works in the city. For Sciarra Colonna, he also painted a loggia and several rooms in the Palace of S. Apostolo.

These works brought him a very great sum of money; wherefore, having resolved to remain no longer in Rome, and having departed in good favour with the whole Court, he returned to his native city of Perugia, in many parts of which he executed panels and works in fresco; [Pg 42] and, in particular, a panel-picture painted in oils for the Chapel of the Palace of the Signori, containing Our Lady and other saints. In S. Francesco del Monte he painted two chapels in fresco, one with the story of the Magi going to make offering to Christ, and the other with the martyrdom of certain friars of S. Francis, who, going to the Soldan of Babylon, were put to death. In S. Francesco del Convento, likewise, he painted two panels in oil, one with the Resurrection of Christ, and the other with S. John the Baptist and other saints. For the Church of the Servi he also painted two panels, one of the Transfiguration of Our Lord, and in the other, which is beside the sacristy, the Story of the Magi; but, since these are not of the same excellence as the other works of Pietro, it is held to be certain that they are among the first that he made. In the Chapel of the Crocifisso in S. Lorenzo, the Duomo of the same city, there are by the hand of Pietro the Madonna, the other Maries, S. John, S. Laurence, S. James, and other saints. And for the Altar of the Sacrament, where there is preserved the ring with which the Virgin Mary was married, he painted the Marriage of the Virgin.

These works earned him a significant amount of money; therefore, having decided to leave Rome, and having maintained good relations with the entire Court, he returned to his hometown of Perugia, where he created panels and frescoes in many places; [Pg 42] and, in particular, a panel painting in oils for the Chapel of the Palace of the Signori, featuring Our Lady and other saints. In S. Francesco del Monte, he painted two frescoed chapels, one depicting the story of the Magi visiting Christ, and the other showing the martyrdom of certain friars of S. Francis, who were executed while going to see the Soldan of Babylon. In S. Francesco del Convento, he also painted two oil panels, one illustrating the Resurrection of Christ, and the other portraying S. John the Baptist and other saints. For the Church of the Servi, he painted two panels, one of the Transfiguration of Our Lord, and the other, located next to the sacristy, showing the Story of the Magi; however, since these are not as high in quality as the other works by Pietro, it is believed that they are among the first he created. In the Chapel of the Crocifisso in S. Lorenzo, the Cathedral of the same city, there are paintings by Pietro depicting the Madonna, the other Maries, S. John, S. Laurence, S. James, and other saints. For the Altar of the Sacrament, where the ring used in the Virgin Mary's marriage is kept, he painted the Marriage of the Virgin.

Triptych.

PIETRO PERUGINO: TRIPTYCH
(London: National Gallery, 288. Panel)
View larger image

PIETRO PERUGINO: TRIPTYCH
(London: National Gallery, 288. Panel)
View larger image

Afterwards he painted in fresco the whole of the Audience Chamber of the Cambio,[4] adorning the compartments of the vaulting with the seven planets, drawn in certain cars by diverse animals, according to the old usage; on the wall opposite to the door of entrance he painted the Nativity and Resurrection of Christ, with a panel containing S. John the Baptist in the midst of certain other saints. The side-walls he painted in his own manner; one with figures of Fabius Maximus, Socrates, Numa Pompilius, F. Camillus, Pythagoras, Trajan, L. Sicinius, the Spartan Leonidas, Horatius Cocles, Fabius, Sempronius, the Athenian Pericles, and Cincinnatus. On the other wall he made the Prophets, Isaiah, Moses, Daniel, David, Jeremiah, and Solomon; and the Sibyls, the Erythræan, the Libyan, the Tiburtine, the Delphic, and the others. Below each of the said figures he placed, in the form of a written motto, something said by them, and appropriate to that place. And in one of the ornaments he made his own portrait, which appears absolutely alive, and he wrote his own name below it in the following manner:

Afterwards, he frescoed the entire Audience Chamber of the Cambio,[4] decorating the vaulted ceilings with the seven planets, each represented in chariots pulled by various animals, as was the custom of the time. On the wall across from the entrance, he painted the Nativity and Resurrection of Christ, along with a panel featuring St. John the Baptist among several other saints. He designed the side walls in his unique style; one wall displayed figures of Fabius Maximus, Socrates, Numa Pompilius, F. Camillus, Pythagoras, Trajan, L. Sicinius, Spartan Leonidas, Horatius Cocles, Fabius, Sempronius, Athenian Pericles, and Cincinnatus. On the opposite wall, he depicted the Prophets Isaiah, Moses, Daniel, David, Jeremiah, and Solomon, as well as the Sibyls: the Erythræan, the Libyan, the Tiburtine, the Delphic, and others. Below each figure, he included a written motto with something they had said that was relevant to their depiction. Among the decorations, he created a self-portrait that looks incredibly lifelike and wrote his name beneath it in the following way:

[Pg 43] PETRUS PERUSINUS EGREGIUS PICTOR.
PERDITA SI FUERAT, PINGENDO HIC RETULIT ARTEM;
SI NUNQUAM INVENTA ESSET HACTENUS, IPSE DEDIT.
ANNO D. 1500.

[Pg 43] Petrus Perusinus, exceptional painter.
IF IT HAD BEEN LOST, HE BROUGHT ART BACK THROUGH PAINTING;
IF IT HAD NEVER BEEN FOUND UNTIL NOW, HE GAVE IT.
YEAR 1500.

This work, which was very beautiful and more highly extolled than any other that was executed by Pietro in Perugia, is now held in great price by the men of that city in memory of so famous a craftsman of their own country. Afterwards, in the principal chapel of the Church of S. Agostino, the same man executed a large panel standing by itself and surrounded by a rich ornament, with S. John baptizing Christ on the front part, and on the back—that is, on the side that faces the choir—the Nativity of Christ, with certain saints in the upper parts, and in the predella many scenes wrought very diligently with little figures. And in the Chapel of S. Niccolò, in the said church, he painted a panel for Messer Benedetto Calera.

This artwork, which was incredibly beautiful and praised more than any other created by Pietro in Perugia, is now held in high regard by the people of that city in memory of such a renowned artist from their own homeland. Later, in the main chapel of the Church of S. Agostino, he created a large standalone panel adorned with elaborate decorations, featuring S. John baptizing Christ on the front and, on the back—that is, the side facing the choir—the Nativity of Christ, along with various saints depicted above, and in the predella, numerous scenes meticulously crafted with small figures. In the Chapel of S. Niccolò, within the same church, he painted a panel for Messer Benedetto Calera.

After this, returning to Florence, he painted a S. Bernard on a panel for the Monks of Cestello, and in the chapter-house a Crucifix, the Madonna, S. Benedict, S. Bernard, and S. John. And in S. Domenico da Fiesole, in the second chapel on the right hand, he painted a panel containing Our Lady and three figures, among which is a S. Sebastian worthy of the highest praise. Now Pietro had done so much work, and he always had so many works in hand, that he would very often use the same subjects; and he had reduced the theory of his art to a manner so fixed, that he made all his figures with the same expression. By that time Michelagnolo Buonarroti had already come to the front, and Pietro greatly desired to see his figures, by reason of the praise bestowed on him by craftsmen; and seeing the greatness of his own name, which he had acquired in every place through so grand a beginning, being obscured, he was ever seeking to wound his fellow-workers with biting words. For this reason, besides certain insults aimed at him by the craftsmen, he had only himself to blame when Michelagnolo told him in public that he was a clumsy fool at his art. But Pietro being unable to swallow such an affront, they both appeared before the Tribunal of Eight, where Pietro came off with little honour. Meanwhile the Servite Friars of [Pg 44] Florence, wishing to have the altar-piece of their high-altar painted by some famous master, had handed it over, by reason of the departure of Leonardo da Vinci, who had gone off to France, to Filippino; but he, when he had finished half of one of two panels that were to adorn the altar, passed from this life to the next; wherefore the friars, by reason of the faith that they had in Pietro, entrusted him with the whole work. In that panel, wherein he was painting the Deposition of Christ from the Cross, Filippino had finished the figures of Nicodemus that are taking Him down; and Pietro continued the lower part with the Swooning of the Madonna, and certain other figures. Now this work was to be composed of two panels, one facing towards the choir of the friars, and the other towards the body of the church, and the Deposition from the Cross was to be placed behind, facing the choir, with the Assumption of Our Lady in front; but Pietro made the latter so commonplace, that the Deposition of Christ was placed in front, and the Assumption on the side of the choir. These panels have now been removed, both one and the other, and replaced by the Tabernacle of the Sacrament; they have been set up over certain other altars in that church, and out of the whole work there only remain six pictures, wherein are some saints painted by Pietro in certain niches. It is said that when the work was unveiled, it received no little censure from all the new craftsmen, particularly because Pietro had availed himself of those figures that he had been wont to use in other pictures; with which his friends twitted him, saying that he had taken no pains, and that he had abandoned the good method of working, either through avarice or to save time. To this Pietro would answer: "I have used the figures that you have at other times praised, and which have given you infinite pleasure; if now they do not please you, and you do not praise them, what can I do?" But they kept assailing him bitterly with sonnets and open insults; whereupon, although now old, he departed from Florence and returned to Perugia.

After this, when he returned to Florence, he painted a St. Bernard on a panel for the Monks of Cestello, and in the chapter house, he created a Crucifix, along with depictions of the Madonna, St. Benedict, St. Bernard, and St. John. In the second chapel on the right side of S. Domenico da Fiesole, he painted a panel featuring Our Lady and three figures, including a highly praised St. Sebastian. By this point, Pietro had completed so much work and always had many projects going that he often reused the same subjects; he had gotten his artistic style so fixed that all his figures bore the same expression. By then, Michelangelo Buonarroti had already risen to prominence, and Pietro was eager to see his works because of the praise he was receiving from other craftsmen. Noticing that his own once-great reputation was being overshadowed, especially after such a remarkable start, he continuously sought to undermine his peers with harsh words. This led to certain insults being directed at him by other craftsmen, and when Michelangelo publicly called him a clumsy fool in his art, he had only himself to blame. Unable to tolerate such an insult, they both found themselves at the Tribunal of Eight, where Pietro left with little honor. Meanwhile, the Servite Friars of [Pg 44] Florence, wanting their high altar piece painted by a renowned master, had previously entrusted it to Filippino due to Leonardo da Vinci's departure for France. However, Filippino passed away after completing half of one of the two panels meant for the altar, which led the friars, having faith in Pietro, to assign him the entire project. In that panel depicting the Deposition of Christ from the Cross, Filippino had finished the figures of Nicodemus taking Christ down; Pietro continued the lower section with the Swooning of the Madonna and several other figures. This work was originally planned as two panels, one facing the friars' choir and the other towards the body of the church. The Deposition from the Cross was intended to be behind the altar, facing the choir, with the Assumption of Our Lady in front, but Pietro made the latter so ordinary that the Deposition was placed in front instead, with the Assumption alongside the choir. Both panels have since been removed and replaced by the Tabernacle of the Sacrament; they have been relocated to other altars in that church, and now only six pictures remain, depicting some saints painted by Pietro in various niches. It is said that when the work was unveiled, it received a lot of criticism from the new craftsmen, especially since Pietro had reused figures from his earlier works. His friends mocked him, claiming he had put in no effort and had abandoned his good working methods, either out of greed or to save time. To this, Pietro would respond, "I have used the figures that you have praised before and that have brought you great pleasure; if now they don’t please you, what can I do?" Despite his protests, they continued to attack him with harsh sonnets and open insults; thus, even though he was now old, he left Florence and returned to Perugia.

There he executed certain works in fresco in the Church of S. Severo, a place belonging to the Monks of the Order of Camaldoli, wherein Raffaello da Urbino, when quite young and still the disciple of Pietro, had painted certain figures, as will be told in his Life. Pietro likewise [Pg 45] worked at Montone, at La Fratta, and in many other places in the district of Perugia; more particularly in S. Maria degli Angeli at Assisi, where he painted in fresco a Christ on the Cross, with many figures, on the wall at the back of the Chapel of the Madonna, which faces the choir of the monks. And for the high-altar of the Church of S. Pietro, an abbey of Black Friars in Perugia, he painted a large panel containing the Ascension, with the Apostles below gazing up to Heaven; in the predella of which panel are three stories, wrought with much diligence—namely, that of the Magi, the Baptism of Christ, and His Resurrection. The whole of this picture is seen to be full of beautiful and careful work, insomuch that it is the best of those wrought in oil by the hand of Pietro which are in Perugia. The same man began a work in fresco of no small importance at Castello della Pieve, but did not finish it.

There he created some frescoes in the Church of S. Severo, a place owned by the Monks of the Camaldoli Order, where Raffaello da Urbino, when he was young and still a disciple of Pietro, had painted some figures, as will be detailed in his Life. Pietro also [Pg 45] worked in Montone, La Fratta, and many other locations in the Perugia area; particularly in S. Maria degli Angeli at Assisi, where he painted a fresco of Christ on the Cross, surrounded by many figures, on the wall behind the Chapel of the Madonna that faces the monks' choir. For the high altar of the Church of S. Pietro, an abbey of Black Friars in Perugia, he painted a large panel featuring the Ascension, with the Apostles below looking up to Heaven; in the predella of this panel are three stories, crafted with great care—namely, the story of the Magi, the Baptism of Christ, and His Resurrection. The entire piece is clearly full of beautiful and meticulous work, making it the best oil painting by Pietro found in Perugia. This same artist started an important fresco project at Castello della Pieve, but he did not complete it.

It was ever Pietro's custom on his going and coming between the said Castello and Perugia, like a man who trusted nobody, to carry all the money that he possessed about his person. Wherefore certain men, lying in wait for him at a pass, robbed him, but at his earnest entreaty they spared his life for the love of God; and afterwards, by means of the services of his friends, who were numerous enough, he also recovered a great part of the money that had been taken from him; but none the less he came near dying of vexation. Pietro was a man of very little religion, and he could never be made to believe in the immortality of the soul—nay, with words in keeping with his head of granite, he rejected most obstinately every good suggestion. He placed all his hopes in the goods of fortune, and he would have sold his soul for money. He earned great riches; and he both bought and built houses in Florence, and acquired much settled property both at Perugia and at Castello della Pieve. He took a most beautiful young woman to wife, and had children by her; and he delighted so greatly in seeing her wearing beautiful head-dresses, both abroad and at home, that it is said that he would often tire her head with his own hand. Finally, having reached the age of seventy-eight, Pietro finished the course of his life at Castello della Pieve, where he was honourably buried, in the year 1524.

It was always Pietro's habit, whenever he traveled between Castello and Perugia, to carry all his money with him, trusting no one. Because of this, some men ambushed him and stole his money, but at his desperate plea, they spared his life for the love of God. Later, with the help of his many friends, he managed to recover a significant portion of the money that had been taken from him; however, he nearly died from frustration. Pietro was not very religious and could never believe in the immortality of the soul—indeed, with a mind as hard as granite, he stubbornly rejected any good advice. He placed all his hopes in material wealth and would have sold his soul for money. He amassed great riches; he bought and built houses in Florence and acquired a lot of real estate both in Perugia and Castello della Pieve. He married a very beautiful young woman and had children with her, and he took such pleasure in seeing her wear lovely hairstyles, both out and at home, that it's said he would often fix her hair himself. Finally, at the age of seventy-eight, Pietro passed away in Castello della Pieve, where he was honorably buried in 1524.

Pietro made many masters in his own manner, and one among them, [Pg 46] who was truly most excellent, devoted himself heart and soul to the honourable studies of painting, and surpassed his master by a great measure; and this was the miraculous Raffaello Sanzio of Urbino, who worked for many years under Pietro in company with his father, Giovanni de' Santi. Another disciple of this man was Pinturicchio, a painter of Perugia, who, as it has been said in his Life, ever held to Pietro's manner. His disciple, likewise, was Rocco Zoppo, a painter of Florence, by whose hand is a very beautiful Madonna in a round picture, which is in the possession of Filippo Salviati; although it is true that it was brought to completion by Pietro himself. The same Rocco painted many pictures of Our Lady, and made many portraits, of which there is no need to speak; I will only say that in the Sistine Chapel in Rome he painted portraits of Girolamo Riario and of F. Pietro, Cardinal of San Sisto. Another disciple of Pietro was Montevarchi, who painted many pictures in San Giovanni di Valdarno; more particularly, in the Madonna, the stories of the Miracle of the Milk. He also left many works in Montevarchi, his birth-place. Likewise a pupil of Pietro's, working with him for no little time, was Gerino da Pistoia, of whom there has been mention in the Life of Pinturicchio; and so also was Baccio Ubertino of Florence, who was most diligent both in colouring and in drawing, for which reason Pietro made much use of him. By this man's hand is a drawing in our book, done with the pen, of Christ being scourged at the Column, which is a very lovely thing.

Pietro trained many artists in his unique style, and one of them, [Pg 46], who was truly exceptional, dedicated himself fully to the noble art of painting and greatly surpassed his teacher; this was the remarkable Raffaello Sanzio of Urbino, who worked alongside his father, Giovanni de' Santi, under Pietro for many years. Another student of Pietro was Pinturicchio, a painter from Perugia, who, as mentioned in his biography, always adhered to Pietro's style. He also had Rocco Zoppo, a painter from Florence, as a disciple, known for a beautiful Madonna in a round painting that belongs to Filippo Salviati; although it’s true that Pietro completed it. Rocco created many pictures of Our Lady and numerous portraits, although I won't go into detail about those; I will only mention that in the Sistine Chapel in Rome, he painted portraits of Girolamo Riario and F. Pietro, Cardinal of San Sisto. Another of Pietro's students was Montevarchi, who painted many works in San Giovanni di Valdarno, specifically in the Madonna, depicting the stories of the Miracle of the Milk. He also left behind many works in Montevarchi, his hometown. Gerino da Pistoia, also a pupil of Pietro who worked with him for quite a while, has been mentioned in the Life of Pinturicchio; along with him was Baccio Ubertino from Florence, who was very hardworking in both color and drawing, which is why Pietro relied on him heavily. This artist created a pen drawing in our book of Christ being scourged at the Column, which is truly beautiful.

Madonna and Child, with Saints.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Giovanni (Lo Spagna).
Assisi: Lower Church)
Anderson
View larger image

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Giovanni (Lo Spagna).
Assisi: Lower Church)
Anderson
View larger image

A brother of this Baccio, and likewise a disciple of Pietro, was Francesco, called Il Bacchiaccha by way of surname, who was a most diligent master of little figures, as may be seen in many works wrought by him in Florence, above all in the house of Giovan Maria Benintendi and in that of Pier Francesco Borgherini. Bacchiaccha delighted in painting grotesques, wherefore he covered a little cabinet belonging to the Lord Duke Cosimo with animals and rare plants, drawn from nature, which are held very beautiful. Besides this, he made the cartoons for many tapestries, which were afterwards woven in silk by the Flemish master, Giovanni Rosto, for the apartments of his Excellency's Palace. Still another disciple of Pietro was the Spaniard Giovanni, called Lo Spagna [Pg 47] by way of surname, who was a better colourist than any of the others whom Pietro left behind him at his death; after which this Giovanni would have settled in Perugia, if the envy of the painters of that city, so hostile to strangers, had not persecuted him in such wise as to force him to retire to Spoleto, where, by reason of his excellence and virtue, he obtained a wife of good family and was made a citizen of that city. He made many works in that place, and likewise in all the other cities of Umbria; and at Assisi, in the lower Church of S. Francesco, he painted the panel of the Chapel of S. Caterina, for the Spanish Cardinal Egidio, and also one in S. Damiano. In S. Maria degli Angeli, in the little chapel where S. Francis died, he painted some half-length figures of the size of life—that is, certain companions of S. Francis and other saints—all very lifelike, on either side of a S. Francis in relief.

A brother of Baccio, also a student of Pietro, was Francesco, nicknamed Il Bacchiaccha. He was a very dedicated master of small figures, as seen in many of his works in Florence, especially in the homes of Giovan Maria Benintendi and Pier Francesco Borgherini. Bacchiaccha enjoyed painting grotesques, so he decorated a small cabinet belonging to Lord Duke Cosimo with animals and rare plants from nature, which are considered very beautiful. In addition, he created the designs for many tapestries that were later woven in silk by the Flemish master, Giovanni Rosto, for the rooms of His Excellency's Palace. Another student of Pietro was the Spaniard Giovanni, known as Lo Spagna, who excelled at color more than any of Pietro's other followers. After Pietro's death, Giovanni would have settled in Perugia if the jealous painters there, who were unfriendly to outsiders, hadn't driven him to relocate to Spoleto. Due to his skill and character, he married into a good family and became a citizen of that city. He completed many works there and across other cities in Umbria; at Assisi, in the lower Church of S. Francesco, he painted the panel for the Chapel of S. Caterina for the Spanish Cardinal Egidio, as well as another one in S. Damiano. In S. Maria degli Angeli, in the small chapel where S. Francis died, he painted life-size half-length figures of some of S. Francis's companions and other saints, all very lifelike, alongside a relief of S. Francis.

But the best master among all the aforesaid disciples of Pietro was Andrea Luigi of Assisi, called L'Ingegno, who in his early youth competed with Raffaello da Urbino under the discipline of Pietro, who always employed him in the most important pictures that he made; as may be seen in the Audience Chamber of the Cambio in Perugia, where there are some very beautiful figures by his hand; in those that he wrought at Assisi; and, finally, in the Chapel of Pope Sixtus at Rome. In all these works Andrea gave such proof of his worth, that he was expected to surpass his master by a great measure, and so, without a doubt, it would have come to pass; but fortune, which is almost always pleased to oppose herself to lofty beginnings, did not allow L'Ingegno to reach perfection, for a flux of catarrh fell upon his eyes, whence the poor fellow became wholly blind, to the infinite grief of all who knew him. Hearing of this most pitiful misfortune, Pope Sixtus, like a man who ever loved men of talent, ordained that a yearly provision should be paid to Andrea in Assisi during his lifetime by those who managed the revenues there; and this was done until he died at the age of eighty-six.

But the best master among all the mentioned students of Pietro was Andrea Luigi of Assisi, known as L'Ingegno, who in his early years competed with Raffaello da Urbino under Pietro's guidance, who always assigned him to the most important paintings he created. This can be seen in the Audience Chamber of the Cambio in Perugia, where there are some beautiful figures by him; in those he created at Assisi; and finally, in the Chapel of Pope Sixtus in Rome. In all these works, Andrea proved his worth so much that he was expected to greatly surpass his master, and without a doubt, he would have, but fortune, which often seems to oppose great beginnings, didn't allow L'Ingegno to achieve perfection. A severe cold affected his eyes, leading to his complete blindness, which brought immense sorrow to all who knew him. Upon hearing of this tragic misfortune, Pope Sixtus, a man who always valued talent, ordered that a yearly stipend be allocated to Andrea in Assisi for the rest of his life from those managing the revenues there, and this continued until he died at the age of eighty-six.

Likewise disciples of Pietro, and also natives of Perugia, were Eusebio San Giorgio, who painted the panel of the Magi in S. Agostino; Domenico di Paris, who made many works in Perugia and in the neighbouring townships, being followed by his brother Orazio; and also Gian [Pg 48] Niccola, who painted Christ in the Garden on a panel in S. Francesco, the panel of Ognissanti in the Chapel of the Baglioni in S. Domenico, and stories of S. John the Baptist in fresco in the Chapel of the Cambio. Benedetto Caporali, otherwise called Bitti, was also a disciple of Pietro, and there are many pictures by his hand in his native city of Perugia. And he occupied himself so greatly with architecture, that he not only executed many works, but also wrote a commentary on Vitruvius in the manner that all can see, for it is printed; in which studies he was followed by his son Giulio, a painter of Perugia.

Similarly, Pietro's disciples, who were also from Perugia, included Eusebio San Giorgio, who painted the panel of the Magi in S. Agostino; Domenico di Paris, who created many works in Perugia and the surrounding towns, followed by his brother Orazio; and Gian [Pg 48] Niccola, who painted Christ in the Garden on a panel in S. Francesco, the Ognissanti panel in the Chapel of the Baglioni in S. Domenico, and frescoes of the stories of S. John the Baptist in the Chapel of the Cambio. Benedetto Caporali, also known as Bitti, was another disciple of Pietro, with many works by him in his hometown of Perugia. He was very involved in architecture, executing numerous projects and writing a commentary on Vitruvius, which is available in print for everyone to see; his son Giulio, also a painter from Perugia, continued these studies.

But not one out of all these disciples ever equalled Pietro's diligence, or the grace of colouring that he showed in that manner of his own, which pleased his time so much, that many came from France, from Spain, from Germany, and from other lands, to learn it. And a trade was done in his works, as has been said, by many who sent them to diverse places, until there came the manner of Michelagnolo, which, having shown the true and good path to these arts, has brought them to that perfection which will be seen in the Third Part, about to follow, wherein we will treat of the excellence and perfection of art, and show to craftsmen that he who labours and studies continuously, and not in the way of fantasy or caprice, leaves true works behind him and acquires fame, wealth, and friends.

But none of these disciples ever matched Pietro's dedication or the beautiful way he used color, which was so popular in his time that many came from France, Spain, Germany, and other places to learn his technique. His works were widely traded, as mentioned, with many sending them to different locations. Then came Michelangelo's style, which revealed the true and right direction for these arts, leading them to a level of perfection that will be discussed in the Third Part, which follows. In that section, we'll explore the excellence and perfection of art, showing craftsmen that those who work hard and study consistently, rather than relying on whim or impulse, leave behind true masterpieces and gain fame, wealth, and friends.


[Pg 49] VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO), AND OTHER VENETIAN AND LOMBARD PAINTERS


[Pg 51] LIVES OF VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO), AND OF OTHER VENETIAN AND LOMBARD PAINTERS

It is very well known that when some of our craftsmen make a beginning in some province, they are afterwards followed by many, one after another; and very often there is an infinite number of them at one and the same time, for the reason that rivalry, emulation, and the fact that they have been dependent on others, one on one excellent master, and one on another, bring it about that the craftsmen seek with all the greater effort to surpass one another, to the utmost of their ability. And even when many depend on one, no sooner do they separate, either at the death of their master or for some other reason, than they straightway also separate in aim; whereupon each seeks to prove his own worth, in order to appear better than the rest and a master by himself.

It's well known that when some of our artisans start working in a certain area, they are soon followed by many others, one after another. Often, there are countless artisans all at once because competition and the desire to outdo each other, along with having learned from different skilled masters, drive them to try even harder to excel beyond their peers. Also, even when many rely on one master, as soon as they part ways—whether due to the master’s passing or another reason—they quickly diverge in their goals. Each then strives to prove their own skill, aiming to stand out and be recognized as a master in their own right.

Of many, then, who flourished almost at one and the same time and in one and the same province, and about whom I have not been able to learn and am not able to write every particular, I will give some brief account, to the end that, now that I find myself at the end of the Second Part of this my work, I may not omit some who have laboured to leave the world adorned by their works. Of these men, I say, besides having been unable to discover their whole history, I have not even been able to find the portraits, excepting that of Scarpaccia, whom for this reason I have made head of the others. Let my readers therefore accept what I can offer in this connection, seeing that I cannot offer what I would wish. There lived, then, in the March of Treviso and in Lombardy, during a period of many years, Stefano Veronese, Aldigieri da Zevio, Jacopo Davanzo of Bologna, Sebeto da Verona, Jacobello de Flore, Guerriero da Padova, Giusto, Girolamo Campagnola and his son Giulio, and Vincenzio [Pg 52] Bresciano; Vittore, Sebastiano,[5] and Lazzaro[5] Scarpaccia, Venetians; Vincenzio Catena, Luigi Vivarini, Giovan Battista da Conigliano, Marco Basarini,[6] Giovanetto Cordegliaghi, Il Bassiti, Bartolommeo Vivarini, Giovanni Mansueti, Vittore Bellini, Bartolommeo Montagna of Vicenza, Benedetto Diana, and Giovanni Buonconsigli, with many others, of whom there is no need to make mention here.

Of the many who thrived around the same time and in the same region, about whom I haven't been able to gather every detail, I will provide a brief account so that as I wrap up the Second Part of this work, I won't overlook those who have contributed to the world with their creations. I want to note that, while I couldn't uncover their entire stories, I couldn't even find their portraits, except for Scarpaccia, whom I've chosen to highlight first. So, I ask my readers to accept what I can present in this regard, knowing I wish I could provide more. During many years in the March of Treviso and in Lombardy, there lived Stefano Veronese, Aldigieri da Zevio, Jacopo Davanzo of Bologna, Sebeto da Verona, Jacobello de Flore, Guerriero da Padova, Giusto, Girolamo Campagnola and his son Giulio, and Vincenzio [Pg 52] Bresciano; Vittore, Sebastiano,[5] and Lazzaro[5] Scarpaccia, Venetians; Vincenzio Catena, Luigi Vivarini, Giovan Battista da Conigliano, Marco Basarini,[6] Giovanetto Cordegliaghi, Il Bassiti, Bartolommeo Vivarini, Giovanni Mansueti, Vittore Bellini, Bartolommeo Montagna of Vicenza, Benedetto Diana, and Giovanni Buonconsigli, along with many others who don't need to be mentioned here.

The Madonna and Child with S. Catharine in a Rose Garden.

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. CATHARINE IN A ROSE GARDEN
(After the panel by Stefano da Verona (da Zevio).
Verona: Gallery, 559)
Brogi
View larger image

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. CATHARINE IN A ROSE GARDEN
(After the panel by Stefano da Verona (from Zevio).
Verona: Gallery, 559)
Brogi
View larger image

To begin with the first, I start by saying that Stefano Veronese, of whom I gave some account in the Life of Agnolo Gaddi, was a painter more than passing good in his day. And when Donatello was working in Padua, as has been already told in his Life, going on one of several occasions to Verona, he was struck with marvel at the works of Stefano, declaring that the pictures which he had made in fresco were the best that had been wrought in those parts up to that time. The first works of this man were in the tramezzo[7] of the Church of S. Antonio at Verona, at the top of a wall on the left, below the curve of a part of the vaulting; and the subjects were a Madonna with the Child in her arms, and S. James and S. Anthony, one on either side of her. This work is held very beautiful in that city even at the present day, by reason of a certain liveliness that is seen in the said figures, particularly in the heads, which are wrought with much grace. In S. Niccolò, a parish church of that city, likewise, he painted a S. Nicholas in fresco, which is very beautiful. On the front of a house in the Via di S. Polo, which leads to the Porta del Vescovo, he painted the Virgin, with certain very beautiful angels and a S. Christopher; and over the wall of the Church of S. Consolata in the Via del Duomo, in a recess made in the wall, he painted a Madonna and certain birds, in particular a peacock, his emblem. In S. Eufemia, a convent of the Eremite Friars of S. Augustine, he painted over the side-door a S. Augustine with two other saints, and under the mantle of this S. Augustine are many friars and nuns of his Order; but the most beautiful things in this work are two half-length prophets of the size of life, for the reason that they have the most beautiful and most lifelike heads [Pg 53] that Stefano ever made; and the colouring of the whole work, having been executed with diligence, has remained beautiful even to our own day, notwithstanding that it has been much exposed to rain, wind, and frost. If this work had been under cover, it would still be as beautiful and fresh as it issued from his hands, for the reason that Stefano did not retouch it on the dry, but used diligence in executing it well in fresco; as it is, it has suffered a little. Within the church, in the Chapel of the Sacrament—namely, round the Tabernacle—he afterwards painted certain angels flying, some of whom are sounding instruments, some singing, and others burning incense before the Sacrament; together with a figure of Jesus Christ, which he painted at the top as a finish to the Tabernacle. Below there are other angels, who are supporting Him, clothed in white garments reaching to their feet, and ending, as it were, in clouds, which was an idea peculiar to Stefano in painting figures of angels, whom he always made most gracious in countenance and very beautiful in expression. In this same work are life-size figures of S. Augustine and S. Jerome, one on either side; and these are supporting with their hands the Church of God, as if to show that both of them defend Holy Church from heretics with their learning, and support her. On a pilaster of the principal chapel in the same church he painted a S. Eufemia in fresco, with a beautiful and gracious expression of countenance; and there he wrote his own name in letters of gold, perchance since it appeared to him to be, as in fact it is, one of the best pictures that he had made; and according to his custom he painted there a very beautiful peacock, and beside it two lion cubs, which are not very beautiful, because at that time he could not see live ones, as he saw the peacock. He also painted for the same place a panel containing, as was the custom in those times, many half-length figures, such as S. Niccola da Tolentino and others; and he filled the predella with scenes in little figures from the life of that Saint. In S. Fermo, a church in the same city belonging to the Friars of S. Francis, he painted, as an ornament for a Deposition from the Cross on the wall opposite to the side-door of entrance, twelve half-length prophets of the size of life, with Adam and Eve lying below them, and his usual peacock, which is almost the hall-mark of pictures executed by him.

To start with the first point, I want to mention that Stefano Veronese, whom I talked about in the Life of Agnolo Gaddi, was a rather talented painter in his time. When Donatello was working in Padua, as mentioned in his Life, he visited Verona on several occasions and was amazed by Stefano's works, stating that the frescoes he created were the finest in that region up to that moment. Stefano's early works can be found in the tramezzo[7] of the Church of S. Antonio in Verona, located at the top of a wall on the left, under the curve of part of the vaulting. The subjects depicted are a Madonna holding the Child in her arms, with S. James and S. Anthony on either side of her. This work is still regarded as very beautiful in the city today, due to the liveliness seen in the figures, especially in the heads, which are crafted with great grace. In S. Niccolò, a parish church in the city, he also painted a fresco of S. Nicholas, which is quite stunning. On the front of a house on Via di S. Polo, leading to the Porta del Vescovo, he painted the Virgin, accompanied by several beautiful angels and S. Christopher. Over the wall of the Church of S. Consolata on Via del Duomo, in a niche made in the wall, he painted a Madonna along with some birds, notably a peacock, which is his emblem. In S. Eufemia, a convent of the Eremite Friars of S. Augustine, he painted over the side door S. Augustine alongside two other saints, where many friars and nuns from his Order are gathered under S. Augustine's mantle; however, the most remarkable parts of this work are two life-size half-length prophets, as they showcase the most beautiful and lifelike heads that Stefano ever painted. The coloring of the entire piece, executed with care, has remained lovely even to our days, despite being exposed to rain, wind, and frost. If this work had been protected, it would still appear as beautiful and fresh as when it left his hands, since Stefano didn’t retouch it once it was dry and took great care in executing it well in fresco; as it is, it has suffered a little wear. Inside the church, in the Chapel of the Sacrament—around the Tabernacle—he later painted flying angels, some playing musical instruments, some singing, and others burning incense before the Sacrament, along with a figure of Jesus Christ, which he painted at the top to finish off the Tabernacle. Below, there are other angels supporting Him, dressed in white garments that reach their feet, blending into clouds, an idea Stefano uniquely used when painting angels, whom he always depicted with a graceful demeanor and beautiful expressions. In this same work, life-size figures of S. Augustine and S. Jerome are placed on either side, supporting the Church of God with their hands to symbolize their defense of the Holy Church against heretics through their knowledge. On a pilaster of the main chapel in the same church, he painted a fresco of S. Eufemia, capturing a lovely and gracious expression; there, he wrote his name in gold letters, perhaps because he believed it was one of his best pieces, which, in fact, it is. Following his usual style, he also painted a very beautiful peacock, and next to it, two lion cubs, which are not very attractive because, at that time, he couldn't observe live ones as he could the peacock. He also created a panel for the same location containing many half-length figures, such as S. Niccola da Tolentino and others, filling the predella with smaller scenes from that saint's life. In S. Fermo, a church in the same city belonging to the Friars of S. Francis, he painted, as decoration for a Deposition from the Cross on the wall opposite the entrance side door, twelve life-sized half-length prophets, with Adam and Eve lying below them, along with his signature peacock, which has become almost a hallmark of his works.

[Pg 54] In Mantua, at the Martello gate of the Church of S. Domenico, the same Stefano painted a most beautiful Madonna; the head of which Madonna, when they had need to build in that place, those fathers placed with care in the tramezzo[8] of the church—that is, in the Chapel of S. Orsola, which belongs to the Recuperati family, and contains some pictures in fresco by the hand of the same man. And in the Church of S. Francesco, on the right hand as one enters by the principal door, there is a row of chapels formerly built by the noble Della Ramma family, in one of which are seated figures of the four Evangelists, painted on the vaulting by the hand of Stefano; and behind their shoulders, for a background, he made certain espaliers of roses, with a cane trellis-work in a pattern of mandorle, above which are various trees and other greenery full of birds, particularly of peacocks; and there are also some very beautiful angels. In this same church, on a column on the right hand as one enters, he painted a life-size figure of S. Mary Magdalene. And in the same city, on the frontal of a door in the street called Rompilanza, he painted in fresco a Madonna with the Child in her arms, and some angels kneeling before her; and the background he made of trees covered with fruit.

[Pg 54] In Mantua, at the Martello gate of the Church of St. Domenico, Stefano painted a stunning Madonna. When they needed to build in that spot, the fathers carefully placed the head of that Madonna in the tramezzo[8] of the church—that is, in the Chapel of St. Orsola, which belongs to the Recuperati family and contains several frescoes by the same artist. In the Church of St. Francesco, on the right as you enter through the main door, there's a row of chapels that were previously built by the noble Della Ramma family. In one of these chapels, there are seated figures of the four Evangelists, painted on the vaulting by Stefano. Behind them, he created a background of rose trellises with a mandorle pattern, above which are various trees and other greenery filled with birds, especially peacocks; there are also some beautiful angels. In this same church, on a column to the right as you enter, he painted a life-size figure of St. Mary Magdalene. Additionally, in the city, on the front of a door on the street called Rompilanza, he frescoed a Madonna holding the Child in her arms, with some angels kneeling in front of her; the background is made up of fruit-laden trees.

These, then, are the works that are found to have been executed by Stefano, although it may well be believed, since his life was not a short one, that he made many others. But even as I have not been able to discover any more of them, so I have failed to find his surname, his father's name, his portrait, or any other particulars. Some declare that before he came to Florence he was a disciple of Maestro Liberale, a painter of Verona; but this matters nothing. It is enough that he learnt all that there was of the good in him from Agnolo Gaddi in Florence.

These are the works that have been identified as created by Stefano, though it's likely that, since he lived a long life, he produced many others. However, just as I haven't been able to find more of his works, I also couldn't discover his last name, his father's name, his portrait, or any other details. Some people say that before he moved to Florence, he was a student of Maestro Liberale, a painter from Verona; but that doesn't really matter. What matters is that he learned everything good from Agnolo Gaddi in Florence.

Presentation to the Madonna of Three Knights of the Cavalli Family.

PRESENTATION TO THE MADONNA OF THREE KNIGHTS OF THE CAVALLI FAMILY
(After the fresco by Aldigieri da Zevio [Altichiero].
Verona: S. Anastasia)
Alinari
View larger image

PRESENTATION TO THE MADONNA OF THREE KNIGHTS OF THE CAVALLI FAMILY
(After the fresco by Aldigieri da Zevio [Altichiero].
Verona: S. Anastasia)
Alinari
View larger image

Of the same city of Verona was Aldigieri da Zevio, who was very much the friend of the Signori della Scala, and who, besides many other works, painted the Great Hall of their Palace (which is now the habitation of the Podestà), depicting therein the War of Jerusalem, according as it is described by Josephus. In this work Aldigieri showed great spirit [Pg 55] and judgment, distributing one scene over the walls of that hall on every side, with a single ornament encircling it right round; on the upper part of which ornament, as it were to set it off, he placed a row of medallions, in which it is believed that there are the portraits from life of many distinguished men of those times, particularly of many of those Signori della Scala; but, since the truth about this is not known, I will say no more of it. I must say, indeed, that Aldigieri showed in this work that he had intelligence, judgment, and invention, seeing that he took into consideration all the things that can be taken into consideration in a serious war. Besides this, the colouring has remained very fresh; and among many portraits of men of distinction and learning, there is seen that of Messer Francesco Petrarca.

Aldigieri da Zevio was from the same city of Verona and was a close friend of the Signori della Scala. In addition to many other works, he painted the Great Hall of their Palace (which is now where the Podestà lives), illustrating the War of Jerusalem, as described by Josephus. In this piece, Aldigieri demonstrated great spirit [Pg 55] and skill, spreading one scene across all the walls of that hall, with a single ornament wrapping around it. At the top of this ornament, to enhance it, he placed a row of medallions, which are believed to feature lifelike portraits of many notable figures of the time, especially several members of the Signori della Scala; however, since the truth about this isn't confirmed, I won't elaborate further. I must say that Aldigieri displayed intelligence, judgment, and creativity in this work, taking into account all aspects that can be considered in a serious war. Furthermore, the coloring has remained quite vibrant, and among many portraits of distinguished and learned men, there is one of Messer Francesco Petrarca.

Jacopo Avanzi, a painter of Bologna, shared the work of this hall with Aldigieri, and below the aforesaid pictures he painted two most beautiful Triumphs, likewise in fresco, with so much art and so good a manner, that Girolamo Campagnola declares that Mantegna used to praise them as pictures of the rarest merit. The same Jacopo, together with Aldigieri and Sebeto da Verona, painted the Chapel of S. Giorgio, which is beside the Church of S. Antonio, in Padua, according to the directions left in the testaments of the Marquesses of Carrara. Jacopo Avanzi painted the upper part; below this were certain stories of S. Lucia, with a Last Supper, by Aldigieri; and Sebeto painted stories of S. John. Afterwards these three masters, having all returned to Verona, joined together to paint a wedding-feast, with many portraits and costumes of those times, in the house of the Counts Serenghi. Now the work of Jacopo Avanzi was held to be the best of all; but, since mention has been made of him in the Life of Niccolò d' Arezzo by reason of the works that he made in Bologna in competition with the painters Simone, Cristofano, and Galasso, I will say no more about him in this place.

Jacopo Avanzi, a painter from Bologna, worked alongside Aldigieri in this hall, and below the mentioned pictures, he created two stunning Triumphs, also in fresco, with such skill and style that Girolamo Campagnola stated that Mantegna often praised them as exceptionally valuable pieces. The same Jacopo, along with Aldigieri and Sebeto from Verona, painted the Chapel of S. Giorgio, which is next to the Church of S. Antonio in Padua, following the instructions left in the wills of the Marquesses of Carrara. Jacopo Avanzi handled the upper part; below that, there were stories of S. Lucia, featuring a Last Supper by Aldigieri, and Sebeto painted stories of S. John. Later, the three artists returned to Verona and collaborated on a wedding feast painting, including numerous portraits and costumes from that era, in the house of the Counts Serenghi. At that time, Jacopo Avanzi's work was considered the best of all; however, since he has already been mentioned in the Life of Niccolò d' Arezzo due to his works in Bologna competing with painters Simone, Cristofano, and Galasso, I won't elaborate further on him here.

A man who was held in esteem at Venice about the same time, although he adhered to the Greek manner, was Jacobello de Flore, who made a number of works in that city; in particular, a panel for the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, which stands on the altar of S. Domenico in their church. A competitor of this master was Giromin Morzone, who painted [Pg 56] a number of pictures in Venice and in many cities of Lombardy; but, since he held to the old manner and made all his figures on tiptoe, we will say nothing about him, save that there is a panel by his hand, with many saints, on the Altar of the Assumption in the Church of S. Lena.

A man who was respected in Venice around the same time, even though he followed the Greek style, was Jacobello de Flore. He created many works in that city, notably a panel for the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, which is placed on the altar of S. Domenico in their church. A rival of this master was Giromin Morzone, who painted [Pg 56] numerous pictures in Venice and several cities in Lombardy; however, since he adhered to the old style and positioned all his figures on tiptoe, we won’t comment further, except to mention that there is a panel by him featuring many saints on the Altar of the Assumption in the Church of S. Lena.

A much better master than Morzone was Guerriero, a painter of Padua, who, besides many other works, painted the principal chapel of the Eremite Friars of S. Augustine in Padua, and a chapel for the same friars in the first cloister. He also painted a little chapel in the house of the Urban Prefect, and the Hall of the Roman Emperors, where the students go to dance at the time of the Carnival. He also painted in fresco, in the Chapel of the Podestà of the same city, some scenes from the Old Testament.

A much better master than Morzone was Guerriero, a painter from Padua, who, in addition to many other works, painted the main chapel of the Eremite Friars of St. Augustine in Padua, and a chapel for the same friars in the first cloister. He also painted a small chapel in the house of the Urban Prefect, and the Hall of the Roman Emperors, where students dance during Carnival. He also frescoed some scenes from the Old Testament in the Chapel of the Podestà of the same city.

Giusto, likewise a painter of Padua, painted in the Chapel of S. Giovanni Battista, without the Church of the Vescovado, not only certain scenes from the Old Testament and the New, but also the Revelations of the Apocalypse of S. John the Evangelist; and in the upper part he made a Paradise containing many choirs of angels and other adornments, wrought with beautiful conceptions. In the Church of S. Antonio he painted in fresco the Chapel of S. Luca; and in a chapel in the Church of the Eremite Friars of S. Augustine he painted the liberal arts, with the virtues and vices beside them, and likewise those who have been celebrated for their virtues, and those who have fallen by reason of their vices into the extreme of misery and into the lowest depth of Hell.

Giusto, a painter from Padua, painted scenes from both the Old and New Testaments in the Chapel of St. John the Baptist, located outside the Vescovado Church. He also depicted the Revelations from the Apocalypse of St. John the Evangelist. In the upper part, he created a Paradise filled with many choirs of angels and other beautiful embellishments. In the Church of St. Anthony, he painted the Chapel of St. Luke using fresco techniques. Additionally, in a chapel within the Church of the Eremite Friars of St. Augustine, he illustrated the liberal arts alongside the virtues and vices, as well as those who were celebrated for their virtues and those who fell into extreme misery and the depths of Hell due to their vices.

There was working in Padua, in this man's time, Stefano, a painter of Ferrara, who, as has been said elsewhere, adorned with various pictures the chapel and the tomb wherein is the body of S. Anthony, and also painted the Virgin Mary that is called the Vergine del Pilastro.

There was a painter named Stefano from Ferrara working in Padua during this man's time. As mentioned elsewhere, he decorated the chapel and tomb that holds the body of St. Anthony with various paintings, and he also painted the Virgin Mary, known as the Vergine del Pilastro.

The Vision of S. Ursula.

VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO): THE VISION OF S. URSULA
(Venice: Accademia, 578. Canvas)
View larger image

VITTORE SCARPACCIA (CARPACCIO): THE VISION OF S. URSULA
(Venice: Accademia, 578. Canvas)
View larger image

Another man who was held in esteem in the same times was Vincenzio, a painter of Brescia, according to the account of Filarete, as was also Girolamo Campagnola, another Paduan painter, and a disciple of Squarcione. Then Giulio, son of Girolamo, made many beautiful works of painting, illumination, and copper-engraving, both in Padua and [Pg 57] in other places. In the same city of Padua many things were wrought by Niccolò Moreto, who lived eighty years, and never ceased to exercise his art.

Another man who was well regarded during that time was Vincenzio, a painter from Brescia, according to Filarete. There was also Girolamo Campagnola, another painter from Padua, and a student of Squarcione. Then Giulio, son of Girolamo, created many beautiful works of painting, illumination, and copper-engraving, both in Padua and [Pg 57] in other locations. In the same city of Padua, many works were produced by Niccolò Moreto, who lived for eighty years and never stopped practicing his art.

S. George and the Dragon.

S. GEORGE AND THE DRAGON
(After the panel by Vittore Scarpaccia [Carpaccio].
Venice: S. Giorgio Segli Schiavoni)
Anderson
View larger image

S. GEORGE AND THE DRAGON
(After the panel by Vittore Scarpaccia [Carpaccio].
Venice: S. Giorgio Segli Schiavoni)
Anderson
View larger image

Besides these there were many others, who were connected with Gentile and Giovanni Bellini; but Vittore Scarpaccia was truly the first among them who made works of importance. His first works were in the Scuola of S. Orsola, where he painted on canvas the greater part of the stories that are there, representing the life and death of that Saint; the labours of which pictures he contrived to carry out so well and with such great diligence and art, that he acquired thereby the name of a very good and practised master. This, so it is said, was the reason that the people of Milan caused him to paint a panel in distemper with many figures for the Friars Minor, in their Chapel of S. Ambrogio. On the altar of the Risen Christ in the Church of S. Antonio he painted the scene of Christ appearing to the Magdalene and the other Maries, in which he made a very beautiful view in perspective of a landscape receding into the distance; and in another chapel he painted the story of the Martyrs—that is, their crucifixion—in which work he made more than three hundred figures, what with the large and the small, besides a number of horses and trees, an open Heaven, figures both nude and clothed in diverse attitudes, many foreshortenings, and so many other things, that it can be seen that he did not execute it without extraordinary labour. For the altar of the Madonna, in the Church of S. Giobbe in Canareio, he painted her presenting the Infant Christ to Simeon, and depicted the Madonna herself standing, and Simeon in his cope between two ministers clothed as Cardinals; behind the Virgin are two women, one of whom has two doves, and below are three boys, who are playing on a lute, a serpent, and a lyre, or rather a viol; and the colouring of the whole panel is very charming and beautiful. And, in truth, Vittore was a very diligent and practised master, and many pictures by his hand that are in Venice, both portraits from life and other kinds, are much esteemed for works wrought in those times. He taught his art to two brothers of his own, who imitated him closely, one being Lazzaro, and the other Sebastiano; and by their hand is a panel on the altar of the [Pg 58] Virgin in the Church of the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, showing her seated between S. Catherine and S. Martha, with other female saints, two angels who are sounding instruments, and a very beautiful view of buildings in perspective as a background to the whole work, of which we have the original drawings, by the hand of these men, in our book.

Besides these, there were many others connected with Gentile and Giovanni Bellini; however, Vittore Scarpaccia was truly the first among them to create significant works. His initial pieces were in the Scuola of S. Orsola, where he painted most of the stories showcased there, depicting the life and death of the Saint. He managed to execute these paintings with such skill and dedication that he earned a reputation as a very good and accomplished master. It is said this was the reason the people of Milan commissioned him to paint a large panel in tempera with multiple figures for the Friars Minor in their Chapel of S. Ambrogio. For the altar of the Risen Christ in the Church of S. Antonio, he illustrated the scene of Christ appearing to Magdalene and the other Maries, creating a stunning perspective of a landscape that fades into the distance. In another chapel, he painted the story of the Martyrs, specifically their crucifixion, completing more than three hundred figures, both large and small, in addition to numerous horses and trees, an open sky, figures in various poses, many foreshortenings, and countless other elements, which clearly reflected his extraordinary effort. For the altar of the Madonna in the Church of S. Giobbe in Canareio, he depicted her presenting the Infant Christ to Simeon, illustrating the Madonna standing, with Simeon in his cope between two ministers dressed as Cardinals; behind the Virgin are two women, one carrying two doves, and below are three boys playing a lute, a serpent, and a lyre, or rather a viola; the colors of the entire panel are very charming and beautiful. Indeed, Vittore was a very dedicated and skilled master, and many of his paintings in Venice, both portraits and other types, are highly regarded as exceptional works from that era. He taught his art to two of his brothers, who closely imitated him, one being Lazzaro and the other Sebastiano; their work includes a panel on the altar of the [Pg 58] Virgin in the Church of the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, depicting her seated between S. Catherine and S. Martha, along with other female saints, two angels playing instruments, and a beautifully rendered perspective of buildings in the background, of which we have the original drawings by these men in our book.

Another passing good painter in the time of these masters was Vincenzio Catena, who occupied himself much more with making portraits from the life than with any other sort of painting; and, in truth, some that are to be seen by his hand are marvellous—among others, that of a German of the Fugger family, a man of rank and importance, who was then living in the Fondaco de' Tedeschi at Venice, was painted with great vivacity.

Another notable painter during the time of these masters was Vincenzio Catena, who focused much more on creating lifelike portraits than any other type of painting. In fact, some of his works are truly remarkable—such as the portrait of a German from the Fugger family, an important and prominent man who was living at the Fondaco de' Tedeschi in Venice at the time, painted with great vibrancy.

Another man who made many works in Venice, about the same time, was a disciple of Giovanni Bellini, Giovan Battista da Conigliano, by whose hand is a panel on the altar of S. Pietro Martire in the aforesaid Church of the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, containing the said Saint, S. Nicholas, and S. Benedict, with landscapes in perspective, an angel tuning a cithern, and many little figures more than passing good. And if this man had not died young, it may be believed that he would have equalled his master.

Another artist active in Venice around the same time was a student of Giovanni Bellini, Giovan Battista da Conigliano. He created a panel for the altar of S. Pietro Martire in the Church of the Nuns of the Corpus Domini, featuring the saint, S. Nicholas, and S. Benedict, along with landscapes in perspective, an angel playing a lute, and many small figures that are quite impressive. If he hadn’t died young, it’s likely he would have matched his master’s achievements.

The name of a master not otherwise than good, likewise, in the same art and at the same time, was enjoyed by Marco Basarini, who, painting in Venice, where he was born from a Greek father and mother, executed in S. Francesco della Vigna a panel with a Deposition of Christ from the Cross, and another panel in the Church of S. Giobbe, representing Christ in the Garden, and below Him the three Apostles, who are sleeping, and S. Francis, S. Dominic, and two other saints; but what was most praised in this work was a landscape with many little figures wrought with good grace. In that same church the same Marco painted S. Bernardino on a rock, with other saints.

The name of a master who was truly great was Marco Basarini, who painted in Venice, his birthplace, where he was born to Greek parents. He created a panel showing the Deposition of Christ from the Cross in S. Francesco della Vigna, and another panel in the Church of S. Giobbe, depicting Christ in the Garden with three Apostles who are asleep, along with S. Francis, S. Dominic, and two other saints. The most praised part of this work was the landscape featuring many small figures artistically rendered. In that same church, Marco also painted S. Bernardino on a rock, along with other saints.

S. Jerome in His Study.

VINCENZIO CATENA (DI BIAGIO): S. JEROME IN HIS STUDY
(London: National Gallery, 694. Panel)
View larger image

VINCENZIO CATENA (DI BIAGIO): S. JEROME IN HIS STUDY
(London: National Gallery, 694. Panel)
View larger image

Giovanetto Cordegliaghi made an infinity of devotional pictures in the same city; nay, he scarcely worked at anything else, and, in truth, he had in this sort of painting a very delicate and sweet manner, no little better than that of the aforesaid masters. In S. Pantaleone, in a chapel [Pg 59] beside the principal one, this man painted S. Peter making disputation with two other saints, who are wearing most beautiful draperies, and are wrought with a beautiful manner.

Giovanetto Cordegliaghi created countless devotional images in the same city; in fact, he hardly did anything else. Truly, he had a very delicate and sweet style in this type of painting, which was quite a bit better than that of the previously mentioned masters. In S. Pantaleone, in a chapel [Pg 59] next to the main one, he painted St. Peter arguing with two other saints, who are dressed in beautiful draperies, crafted with great skill.

Tobit and the Angel (Detail).

GIOVAN BATTISTA DA CONIGLIANO (CIMA): TOBIT AND THE ANGEL (DETAIL)
(Venice: Accademia, 592. Panel transferred to Canvas)
View larger image

GIOVAN BATTISTA DA CONIGLIANO (CIMA): TOBIT AND THE ANGEL (DETAIL)
(Venice: Accademia, 592. Panel moved to Canvas)
View larger image

Marco Bassiti was in good repute almost at the same time, and by his hand is a large panel in the Church of the Carthusian Monks at Venice, in which he painted Christ between Peter and Andrew on the Sea of Tiberias, with the sons of Zebedee; making therein an arm of the sea, a mountain, and part of a city, with many persons in the form of little figures. Many other works by this man could be enumerated, but let it be enough to have spoken of this one, which is the best.

Marco Bassiti was well-respected around the same time, and he painted a large panel in the Church of the Carthusian Monks in Venice. In this artwork, he depicted Christ between Peter and Andrew on the Sea of Tiberias, along with the sons of Zebedee. He created an arm of the sea, a mountain, and part of a city, filled with many small figures of people. There are many other works by him that could be mentioned, but it’s enough to highlight this one, which is the best.

Bartolommeo Vivarini of Murano also acquitted himself very well in the works that he made, as may be seen, besides many other examples, in the panel that he executed for the altar of S. Luigi in the Church of SS. Giovanni e Polo; in which panel he portrayed the said S. Luigi seated, wearing the cope, with S. Gregory, S. Sebastian, and S. Dominic on one side of him, and on the other side S. Nicholas, S. Jerome, and S. Rocco, and above them half-length figures of other saints.

Bartolommeo Vivarini of Murano also did an excellent job in his artworks, as demonstrated in many examples, including the panel he created for the altar of S. Luigi in the Church of SS. Giovanni e Polo. In this panel, he depicted S. Luigi seated, wearing the cope, with S. Gregory, S. Sebastian, and S. Dominic on one side of him, and on the other side S. Nicholas, S. Jerome, and S. Rocco, along with half-length figures of other saints above them.

Another man who executed his pictures very well, taking much delight in counterfeiting things of nature, figures, and distant landscapes, was Giovanni Mansueti, who, imitating the works of Gentile Bellini not a little, made many pictures in Venice. At the upper end of the Audience Chamber of the Scuola of S. Marco he painted a S. Mark preaching on the Piazza; in which picture he painted the façade of the church, and, among the multitude of men and women who are listening to the Saint, Turks, Greeks, and the faces of men of diverse nations, with bizarre costumes. In the same place, in another scene wherein he painted S. Mark healing a sick man, he made a perspective view of two staircases and many loggie. In another picture, near to that one, he made a S. Mark converting an infinite multitude to the faith of Christ; in this he made an open temple, with a Crucifix on an altar, and throughout the whole work there are diverse persons with a beautiful variety of expression, dress, and features.

Another artist who created his paintings really well, finding joy in capturing elements of nature, figures, and distant landscapes, was Giovanni Mansueti. He closely imitated the works of Gentile Bellini and produced many paintings in Venice. At the upper end of the Audience Chamber of the Scuola of S. Marco, he painted St. Mark preaching in the Piazza. In this painting, he portrayed the façade of the church and included a crowd of men and women listening to the Saint, featuring Turks, Greeks, and people from various nations dressed in unique costumes. In that same space, in another scene where he depicted St. Mark healing a sick man, he created a perspective view of two staircases and several loggias. In another painting nearby, he illustrated St. Mark converting countless people to the faith of Christ; in this one, he painted an open temple with a Crucifix on an altar, and throughout the artwork, there are diverse individuals with a beautiful variety of expressions, clothing, and features.

The work in the same place was continued after him by Vittore Bellini, who made a view of buildings in perspective, which is passing [Pg 60] good, in a scene wherein S. Mark is taken prisoner and bound, with a number of figures, in which he imitated his predecessors. After these men came Bartolommeo Montagna of Vicenza, a passing good painter, who lived ever in Venice and made many pictures there; and he painted a panel in the Church of S. Maria d' Artone at Padua. Benedetto Diana, likewise, was a painter no less esteemed than the masters mentioned above, as is proved, to say nothing of his other works, by those from his hand that are in S. Francesco della Vigna at Venice, where, for the altar of S. Giovanni, he painted that Saint standing between two other saints, each of whom has a book in his hand.

The work in the same place was continued by Vittore Bellini, who created a perspective view of buildings that is quite good, featuring a scene where S. Mark is captured and bound, surrounded by several figures, imitating his predecessors. Following him was Bartolommeo Montagna from Vicenza, a skilled painter who lived in Venice and created many artworks there; he painted a panel in the Church of S. Maria d' Artone in Padua. Benedetto Diana was also a highly regarded painter, not less esteemed than the previously mentioned masters, as evidenced by his works in S. Francesco della Vigna in Venice, where he painted S. Giovanni standing between two other saints, each holding a book.

Another man who was accounted a good master was Giovanni Buonconsigli, who painted a picture in the Church of SS. Giovanni e Polo for the altar of S. Tommaso d' Aquino, showing that Saint surrounded by many figures, to whom he is reading the Holy Scriptures; and he made therein a perspective view of buildings, which is not otherwise than worthy of praise. There also lived in Venice throughout almost the whole course of his life the Florentine sculptor, Simon Bianco, as did Tullio Lombardo, an excellent master of intaglio.

Another man who was considered a good master was Giovanni Buonconsigli, who painted a picture in the Church of SS. Giovanni e Polo for the altar of St. Thomas Aquinas, depicting the saint surrounded by several figures to whom he is reading the Holy Scriptures; and he created a perspective view of buildings, which is quite commendable. Also, throughout most of his life in Venice lived the Florentine sculptor Simon Bianco, as well as Tullio Lombardo, an excellent master of intaglio.

In Lombardy, likewise, there were excellent sculptors in Bartolommeo Clemente of Reggio and Agostino Busto; and, in intaglio, Jacopo Davanzo of Milan, with Gasparo and Girolamo Misceroni. In Brescia there was a man who was able and masterly at working in fresco, called Vincenzio Verchio, who acquired a very great name in his native place by reason of his beautiful works. The same did Girolamo Romanino, a fine master of design, as is clearly demonstrated by the works made by him in Brescia and in the neighbourhood for many miles around. And not inferior to these—nay, even superior—was Alessandro Moretto, who was very delicate in his colouring, and much the friend of diligence, as the works made by him demonstrate.

In Lombardy, there were also amazing sculptors like Bartolommeo Clemente from Reggio and Agostino Busto; and in engraving, there was Jacopo Davanzo from Milan, along with Gasparo and Girolamo Misceroni. In Brescia, there was a talented fresco artist named Vincenzio Verchio, who gained a great reputation in his hometown because of his beautiful works. Girolamo Romanino, a skilled master of design, also earned acclaim for his creations in Brescia and the surrounding area. Not to be outdone—actually, even better—was Alessandro Moretto, who had a delicate touch with color and was incredibly diligent, as his works clearly show.

Christ on the Mount of Olives.

CHRIST ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES
(After the panel by Marco Bassiti [Basaiti].
Venice: Accademia, 69)
Anderson
View larger image

CHRIST ON THE MOUNT OF OLIVES
(After the panel by Marco Bassiti [Basaiti].
Venice: Accademia, 69)
Anderson
View larger image

But to return to Verona, in which city there have flourished excellent craftsmen, even as they flourish more than ever to-day; there, in times past, were excellent masters in Francesco Bonsignori and Francesco Caroto, and afterwards Maestro Zeno of Verona, who painted the panel of S. Marino in Rimini, with two others, all with much diligence. But [Pg 61] the man who surpassed all others in making certain marvellous figures from life was Il Moro of Verona, or rather, as others called him, Francesco Turbido, by whose hand is a portrait now in the house of Monsignor de' Martini at Venice, of a gentleman of the house of Badovaro, painted in the character of a shepherd; which portrait appears absolutely alive, and can challenge comparison with any of the great number that have been seen in these parts. Battista d' Angelo, son-in-law of this Francesco, is also so lovely in colouring and so masterly in drawing, that he is rather superior than inferior to his father-in-law. But since it is not my intention to speak at present of the living, it must suffice me to have spoken in this place of some with regard to whose lives, as I said at the beginning of this Life, I have not been able to discover every particular with equal minuteness, to the end that their talents and merits may receive from me at least all that little which I, who would fain make it much, am able to give them.

But to get back to Verona, a city that has had amazing craftsmen, and even more so today; in the past, there were great masters like Francesco Bonsignori and Francesco Caroto, followed by Maestro Zeno of Verona, who painted the panel of S. Marino in Rimini, along with two others, all with great effort. But [Pg 61] the person who surpassed everyone else in creating incredible lifelike figures was Il Moro of Verona, or as others called him, Francesco Turbido. He created a portrait that is now in the house of Monsignor de' Martini in Venice, depicting a gentleman from the house of Badovaro, styled as a shepherd; this portrait looks absolutely alive and can compete with any of the numerous works seen in this region. Battista d' Angelo, who is Francesco's son-in-law, is also outstanding in color and masterful in drawing, and he's more skilled than inferior compared to his father-in-law. But since I don't intend to discuss the living right now, I'll just mention a few whose lives, as I noted at the beginning of this Life, I haven't been able to detail completely, so that their talents and achievements may receive at least this little acknowledgment from me, which I hope to expand upon in the future.

Pietà.

PIETÀ
(After the panel by Giovanni Buonconsigli.
Vincenza: Pinacoteca, 22)
Alinari
View larger image

PIETÀ
(After the panel by Giovanni Buonconsigli.
Vincenza: Pinacoteca, 22)
Alinari
View larger image


[Pg 63] JACOPO, CALLED L'INDACO


[Pg 65] LIFE OF JACOPO, CALLED L'INDACO

PAINTER

Jacopo, called L'Indaco, who was a disciple of Domenico del Ghirlandajo, and who worked in Rome with Pinturicchio, was a passing good master in his day; and although he did not make many works, yet those that he did make are worthy of commendation. Nor is there any need to marvel that only very few works issued from his hands, for the reason that, being a gay and humorous fellow and a lover of good cheer, he harboured but few thoughts and would never work save when he could not help it; and so he used to say that doing nothing else but labour, without taking a little pleasure in the world, was no life for a Christian. He lived in close intimacy with Michelagnolo, for when that craftsman, supremely excellent beyond all who have ever lived, wished to have some recreation after his studies and his continuous labours of body and mind, no one was more pleasing to him for the purpose or more suited to his humour than this man.

Jacopo, known as L'Indaco, was a student of Domenico del Ghirlandajo and worked in Rome alongside Pinturicchio. He was a reasonably good artist in his time; even though he didn’t create many pieces, the ones he did are definitely commendable. It's not surprising that he produced so few works; he was a cheerful and humorous guy who enjoyed life and often felt that working too much without enjoying the world wasn't a true life for a Christian. He shared a close friendship with Michelangelo, and whenever Michelangelo, who was undeniably the best of all time, wanted a break from his studies and relentless hard work, he found no one more enjoyable to spend time with or more in tune with his mood than Jacopo.

Jacopo worked for many years in Rome, or, to be more precise, he lived many years in Rome, working very little. By his hand, in that city, is the first chapel on the right hand as one enters the Church of S. Agostino by the door of the façade; on the vaulting of which chapel are the Apostles receiving the Holy Spirit, and on the wall below are two stories of Christ—in one His taking Peter and Andrew from their nets, and in the other the Feast of Simon and the Magdalene, in which there is a ceiling of planks and beams, counterfeited very well. In the panel of the same chapel, which he painted in oil, is a Dead Christ, wrought and executed with much mastery and diligence. In the Trinità at Rome, likewise, there is a little panel by his hand with the Coronation of Our [Pg 66] Lady. But what need is there to say more about this man? What more, indeed, is there to say? It is enough that he loved gossiping as much as he always hated working and painting.

Jacopo spent many years in Rome, or to be more specific, he lived in Rome for many years while working very little. He is responsible for the first chapel on the right as you enter the Church of S. Agostino through the main door; on the ceiling of this chapel are the Apostles receiving the Holy Spirit, and on the wall below are two scenes of Christ—one showing Him calling Peter and Andrew from their nets, and the other depicting the Feast of Simon and Mary Magdalene, which features a ceiling made to look like planks and beams. In the panel of the same chapel, which he painted in oil, there is a Dead Christ, created with great skill and attention. At Trinità in Rome, there’s also a small panel by him representing the Coronation of Our [Pg 66] Lady. But why go on about this man? What else is there to say? It’s enough to note that he loved gossip just as much as he consistently disliked working and painting.

Now seeing that, as has been said, Michelagnolo used to take pleasure in this man's chattering and in the jokes that he was ever making, he kept him almost always at his table; but one day Jacopo wearied him—as such fellows more often than not do come to weary their friends and patrons with their incessant babbling, so often ill-timed and senseless; babbling, I call it, for reasonable talk it cannot be called, since for the most part there is neither reason nor judgment in such people—and Michelagnolo, who, perchance, had other thoughts in his mind at the time and wished to get rid of him, sent him to buy some figs; and no sooner had Jacopo left the house than Michelagnolo bolted the door behind him, determined not to open to him when he came back. L'Indaco, then, on returning from the market-square, perceived, after having knocked at the door for a time in vain, that Michelagnolo did not intend to open to him; whereupon, flying into a rage, he took the figs and the leaves and spread them all over the threshold of the door. This done, he went his way and for many months refused to speak to Michelagnolo; but at last, becoming reconciled with him, he was more his friend than ever. Finally, having reached the age of sixty-eight, he died in Rome.

Now, as mentioned, Michelangelo enjoyed this man's chatter and the jokes he constantly made, so he kept him at his table most of the time. However, one day Jacopo got on his nerves—like folks often do with their endless talking, which is usually poorly timed and pointless. I call it babbling because it can't really be called reasonable conversation, as these people often lack reason or judgment. Michelangelo, maybe having other things on his mind and wanting to get rid of him, sent him to buy some figs. As soon as Jacopo left, Michelangelo locked the door, deciding not to let him back in. When L'Indaco returned from the market and knocked at the door for a while without success, he realized Michelangelo wouldn't open it for him. Furious, he took the figs and leaves and scattered them all over the doorstep. After that, he walked away and refused to speak to Michelangelo for many months. Eventually, they reconciled, and he became even better friends with him. Finally, at the age of sixty-eight, he died in Rome.

Not unlike Jacopo was a younger brother of his, whose proper name was Francesco, although he too was afterwards called L'Indaco by way of surname; and he, likewise, was a painter, and more than passing good. He was not unlike Jacopo—I mean, in his unwillingness to work (to say the least), and in his love of talking—but in one respect he surpassed Jacopo, for he was ever speaking evil of everyone and decrying the works of every craftsman. This man, after having wrought certain things in Montepulciano both in painting and in clay, painted a little panel for the Audience Chamber of the Company of the Nunziata in Arezzo, containing an Annunciation, and a God the Father in Heaven surrounded by many angels in the form of children. And in the same city, on the first occasion when Duke Alessandro went there, he made a [Pg 67] most beautiful triumphal arch, with many figures in relief, at the gate of the Palazzo de' Signori; and also, in competition with other painters who executed a number of other works for the entry of the said Duke, the scenery for the representation of a play, which was held to be very beautiful. Afterwards, having gone to Rome at the time when the Emperor Charles V was expected there, he made some figures in clay, and a coat of arms in fresco for the Roman people on the Campidoglio, which was much extolled. But the best work that ever issued from the hands of this master, and the most highly praised, was a little study wrought in stucco for the Duchess Margherita of Austria in the Palace of the Medici at Rome—a thing so beautiful and so ornate that there is nothing better to be seen; nor do I believe that it is possible, in a certain sense, to do with silver what L'Indaco did in this work with stucco. From these things it may be judged that if this man had taken pleasure in work and had made use of his intelligence, he would have become excellent.

Jacopo had a younger brother named Francesco, who also went by the nickname L'Indaco. Like Jacopo, he was a painter and quite talented. He shared Jacopo's reluctance to work, to put it mildly, and his fondness for chatting. However, he was worse than Jacopo in one way—he constantly spoke ill of others and criticized every craftsman's work. After creating a few pieces in Montepulciano, both paintings and sculptures, he painted a small panel for the Audience Chamber of the Company of the Nunziata in Arezzo, featuring an Annunciation and a representation of God the Father in Heaven surrounded by angelic children. When Duke Alessandro visited the city for the first time, he created a stunning triumphal arch at the gate of the Palazzo de' Signori with intricate relief figures. He also competed with other painters to create scenery for a play that was deemed very beautiful. Later, he went to Rome during the time when Emperor Charles V was expected. There, he crafted some clay figures and painted a coat of arms in fresco for the Roman people on the Campidoglio, which received much praise. However, the best work he ever produced, and the one most highly regarded, was a stunning stucco study for Duchess Margherita of Austria in the Palace of the Medici in Rome—so beautiful and ornate that nothing could surpass it. I doubt it's even possible to achieve with silver what L'Indaco accomplished with this stucco piece. From his work, one can conclude that if he had enjoyed working and applied his intelligence, he could have become exceptional.

Francesco drew passing well, but Jacopo much better, as may be seen in our book.

Francesco drew pretty well, but Jacopo was much better, as you can see in our book.


[Pg 69] LUCA SIGNORELLI OF CORTONA


[Pg 71] LIFE OF LUCA SIGNORELLI OF CORTONA

[LUCA DA CORTONA]

PAINTER

Luca Signorelli, an excellent painter, of whom, according to the order of time, we have now to speak, was more famous throughout Italy in his day, and his works were held in greater price than has ever been the case with any other master at any time whatsoever, for the reason that in the works that he executed in painting he showed the true method of making nudes, and how they can be caused, although only with art and difficulty, to appear alive. He was a pupil and disciple of Piero dal Borgo a San Sepolcro, and greatly did he strive in his youth to imitate his master, and even to surpass him; and the while that he was working with Piero at Arezzo, living in the house of his uncle Lazzaro Vasari, as it has been told, he imitated the manner of the said Piero so well that the one could scarcely be distinguished from the other.

Luca Signorelli, an outstanding painter, who we now need to discuss in chronological order, was more famous across Italy in his time, and his works were valued more highly than those of any other master at any time. This was because his paintings truly demonstrated the technique of depicting nudes and how to make them appear lifelike, albeit with great skill and effort. He was a student and disciple of Piero dal Borgo in San Sepolcro, and during his youth, he worked hard to imitate and even surpass his master. While he collaborated with Piero in Arezzo, living in his uncle Lazzaro Vasari's home, he mimicked Piero's style so effectively that it was often difficult to tell them apart.

The first works of Luca were in S. Lorenzo at Arezzo, where he painted the Chapel of S. Barbara in fresco in the year 1472; and he painted for the Company of S. Caterina, on cloth and in oil, the banner that is borne in processions, and likewise that of the Trinità, although this does not appear to be by the hand of Luca, but by Piero dal Borgo himself. In S. Agostino in the same city he painted the panel of S. Niccola da Tolentino, with most beautiful little scenes, executing the work with good drawing and invention; and in the same place, in the Chapel of the Sacrament, he made two angels wrought in fresco. In the Chapel of the Accolti in the Church of S. Francesco, for Messer Francesco, Doctor of Laws, he painted a panel in which he portrayed the said Messer Francesco with some of his relatives. In this work is a S. Michael weighing [Pg 72] souls, who is admirable; and in him there is seen the knowledge of Luca, both in the splendour of his armour and in the reflected lights, and, in short, throughout the whole work. In his hands he placed a pair of scales, in which are nude figures, very beautifully foreshortened, one going up and the other down; and among other ingenious things that are in this picture is a nude figure most skilfully transformed into a devil, with a lizard licking the blood from a wound in its body. Besides this, there is a Madonna with the Child on her lap, with S. Stephen, S. Laurence, S. Catherine, and two angels, of whom one is playing on a lute and the other on a rebec; and all these figures are draped and adorned so beautifully that it is a marvel. But the most miraculous part of this panel is the predella, which is full of Friars of the said S. Catherine in the form of little figures.

The first works of Luca were in S. Lorenzo at Arezzo, where he painted the Chapel of S. Barbara in fresco in 1472. He also created the banner for the Company of S. Caterina, which is displayed in processions, and the banner of the Trinità, although that one seems to be by Piero dal Borgo instead. In S. Agostino in the same city, he painted the panel of S. Niccola da Tolentino, featuring beautiful little scenes, showcasing excellent drawing and creativity. In the same location, in the Chapel of the Sacrament, he painted two angels in fresco. In the Chapel of the Accolti in the Church of S. Francesco, for Messer Francesco, a Doctor of Laws, he painted a panel depicting Messer Francesco with some of his relatives. This work includes a striking S. Michael weighing [Pg 72] souls, which is impressive; Luca's knowledge is evident in the brilliance of his armor and the play of reflected light throughout the piece. In his hands, he holds a pair of scales, with nude figures beautifully foreshortened—one ascending and the other descending. Among other clever details in this painting is a nude figure skillfully transformed into a devil, with a lizard licking the blood from a wound in its body. Additionally, there’s a Madonna with the Child on her lap, alongside S. Stephen, S. Laurence, S. Catherine, and two angels—one playing a lute and the other a rebec; all of these figures are draped and adorned so beautifully that it is a marvel. However, the most astonishing part of this panel is the predella, filled with little figures of Friars of S. Catherine.

Pan.

LUCA SIGNORELLI: PAN
(Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 79A. Canvas)
View larger image

LUCA SIGNORELLI: PAN
(Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 79A. Canvas)
View larger image

In Perugia, also, he made many works; among others, a panel in the Duomo for Messer Jacopo Vannucci of Cortona, Bishop of that city; in which panel are Our Lady, S. Onofrio, S. Ercolano, S. John the Baptist, and S. Stephen, with a most beautiful angel, who is tuning a lute. At Volterra, over the altar of a Company in the Church of S. Francesco, he painted in fresco the Circumcision of Our Lord, which is considered beautiful to a marvel, although the Infant, having been injured by damp, was restored by Sodoma and made much less beautiful than before. And, in truth, it would be sometimes better to leave works half spoilt, when they have been made by men of excellence, rather than to have them retouched by inferior masters. In S. Agostino in the same city he painted a panel in distemper, and the predella of little figures, with stories of the Passion of Christ; and this is held to be extraordinarily beautiful. At S. Maria a Monte he painted a Dead Christ on a panel for the monks of that place; and at Città di Castello a Nativity of Christ in S. Francesco, with a S. Sebastian on another panel in S. Domenico. In S. Margherita, a seat of the Frati del Zoccolo in his native city of Cortona, he painted a Dead Christ, one of the rarest of his works; and for the Company of the Gesù, in the same city, he executed three panels, of which the one that is on the high-altar is marvellous, showing Christ administering the Sacrament to the Apostles, and Judas placing the [Pg 73] Host into his wallet. In the Pieve, now called the Vescovado, in the Chapel of the Sacrament, he painted some life-size prophets in fresco; and round the tabernacle are some angels who are opening out a canopy, with S. Jerome and S. Thomas Aquinas at the sides. For the high-altar of the said church he painted a panel with a most beautiful Assumption, and he designed the pictures for the principal round window of the same church; which pictures were afterwards executed by Stagio Sassoli of Arezzo. In Castiglione Aretino he made a Dead Christ, with the Maries, over the Chapel of the Sacrament; and in S. Francesco, at Lucignano, he painted the folding-doors of a press, wherein there is a tree of coral surmounted by a cross. At Siena, in the Chapel of S. Cristofano in S. Agostino, he painted a panel with some saints, in the midst of whom is a S. Cristopher in relief.

In Perugia, he created many works; among them, a panel in the cathedral for Messer Jacopo Vannucci of Cortona, Bishop of that city. This panel features Our Lady, S. Onofrio, S. Ercolano, S. John the Baptist, and S. Stephen, along with a stunning angel who is tuning a lute. At Volterra, above the altar of a confraternity in the Church of S. Francesco, he painted a fresco of the Circumcision of Our Lord, which is considered remarkably beautiful, although the Infant, damaged by dampness, was restored by Sodoma and ended up being much less beautiful than before. In fact, it might sometimes be better to leave works that are slightly spoiled, crafted by skilled artists, rather than have them retouched by lesser talent. In S. Agostino in the same city, he painted a panel in tempera and a predella with small figures depicting stories of the Passion of Christ; this is regarded as extraordinarily beautiful. At S. Maria a Monte, he painted a Dead Christ on a panel for the local monks; and in Città di Castello, he created a Nativity of Christ in S. Francesco, along with a S. Sebastian on another panel in S. Domenico. In S. Margherita, a location of the Frati del Zoccolo in his hometown of Cortona, he painted a Dead Christ, one of his rarest works. For the Company of the Gesù in the same city, he completed three panels, with the one on the high altar being spectacular, showing Christ administering the Sacrament to the Apostles, while Judas puts the [Pg 73] Host into his wallet. In the Pieve, now called the Vescovado, in the Chapel of the Sacrament, he painted life-size prophets in fresco; and around the tabernacle, there are angels unfolding a canopy, with S. Jerome and S. Thomas Aquinas on either side. For the high altar of that church, he painted a breathtaking Assumption, and he designed the images for the main round window of the same church; these images were later executed by Stagio Sassoli of Arezzo. In Castiglione Aretino, he created a Dead Christ, accompanied by the Maries, above the Chapel of the Sacrament; and in S. Francesco, at Lucignano, he painted the folding doors of a cabinet, featuring a coral tree topped with a cross. In Siena, in the Chapel of S. Cristofano in S. Agostino, he painted a panel depicting several saints, including a relief of S. Christopher in the center.

Having gone from Siena to Florence in order to see both the works of those masters who were then living and those of many already dead, he painted for Lorenzo de' Medici certain nude gods on a canvas, for which he was much commended, and a picture of Our Lady with two little prophets in terretta, which is now at Castello, a villa of Duke Cosimo's. These works, both the one and the other, he presented to the said Lorenzo, who would never be beaten by any man in liberality and magnificence. He also painted a round picture of Our Lady, which is in the Audience Chamber of the Captains of the Guelph party—a very beautiful work. At Chiusuri in the district of Siena, the principal seat of the Monks of Monte Oliveto, he painted eleven scenes of the life and acts of S. Benedict on one side of the cloister. And from Cortona he sent some of his works to Montepulciano; to Foiano the panel which is on the high-altar of the Pieve; and other works to other places in Valdichiana. In the Madonna, the principal church of Orvieto, he finished with his own hand the chapel that Fra Giovanni da Fiesole had formerly begun there; in which chapel he painted all the scenes of the end of the world with bizarre and fantastic invention—angels, demons, ruins, earthquakes, fires, miracles of Antichrist, and many other similar things besides, such as nudes, foreshortenings, and many beautiful figures; imagining the terror that there shall be on that last and awful day. By [Pg 74] means of this he encouraged all those who have lived after him, insomuch that since then they have found easy the difficulties of that manner; wherefore I do not marvel that the works of Luca were ever very highly extolled by Michelagnolo, nor that in certain parts of his divine Judgment, which he made in the chapel, he should have deigned to avail himself in some measure of the inventions of Luca, as he did in the angels, the demons, the division of the Heavens, and other things, in which Michelagnolo himself imitated Luca's method, as all may see. In this work Luca portrayed himself and many of his friends; Niccolò, Paolo, and Vitelozzo Vitelli, Giovan Paolo and Orazio Baglioni, and others whose names are not known. In the Sacristy of S. Maria at Loreto he painted in fresco the four Evangelists, the four Doctors, and other saints, all very beautiful; and for this work he was liberally rewarded by Pope Sixtus.

After traveling from Siena to Florence to see both the works of contemporary masters and those of many already deceased, he painted certain nude gods on canvas for Lorenzo de' Medici, which earned him much praise. He also created a picture of Our Lady with two little prophets in terretta, now located at Castello, a villa owned by Duke Cosimo. He presented both works to Lorenzo, who was unmatched in generosity and splendor. Additionally, he painted a round picture of Our Lady, currently found in the Audience Chamber of the Captains of the Guelph party—a truly stunning piece. At Chiusuri, in the district of Siena, the main seat of the Monks of Monte Oliveto, he painted eleven scenes depicting the life and deeds of St. Benedict on one side of the cloister. From Cortona, he sent some of his works to Montepulciano; to Foiano, the panel that adorns the high altar of the Pieve; and other works to various locations in Valdichiana. In the Madonna, the main church of Orvieto, he completed the chapel that Fra Giovanni da Fiesole had previously started, where he painted all the scenes of the end of the world with imaginative and fantastical elements—angels, demons, ruins, earthquakes, fires, miracles of Antichrist, and many other similar subjects, including nudes, foreshortenings, and numerous beautiful figures; envisioning the terror that will accompany that last and dreadful day. By [Pg 74] doing this, he inspired all who came after him, making it easier for them to tackle such challenges. Therefore, it's not surprising that Michelangelo often praised Luca's work, or that in some parts of his divine Judgment in the chapel, he chose to draw on Luca's ideas, just as he did in the angels, the demons, the division of the Heavens, and other elements where Michelangelo himself mirrored Luca's style, as anyone can see. In this artwork, Luca depicted himself and many of his friends; Niccolò, Paolo, and Vitelozzo Vitelli, Giovan Paolo and Orazio Baglioni, among others whose names remain unknown. In the Sacristy of S. Maria at Loreto, he frescoed the four Evangelists, the four Doctors, and other saints, all incredibly beautiful; for this work, he received generous rewards from Pope Sixtus.

It is said that a son of his, most beautiful in countenance and in person, whom he loved dearly, was killed at Cortona; and that Luca, heart-broken as he was, had him stripped naked, and with the greatest firmness of soul, without lamenting or shedding a tear, portrayed him, to the end that, whenever he might wish, he might be able by means of the work of his own hands to see that which nature had given him and adverse fortune had snatched away.

It is said that one of his sons, who was extremely handsome and whom he loved deeply, was killed at Cortona. Luca, devastated as he was, had him laid out nude and, with great determination, without crying or showing any grief, painted him. This way, whenever he wanted, he could look at the work of his own hands and see what nature had given him but bad luck had taken away.

Being then summoned by the said Pope Sixtus to work in the chapel of his Palace in competition with many other painters, he painted therein two scenes, which are held the best among so many; one is Moses declaring his testament to the Jewish people on having seen the Promised Land, and the other is his death.

Being then called by Pope Sixtus to work in the chapel of his Palace, competing with many other painters, he painted two scenes there that are considered the best among so many; one depicts Moses sharing his testament with the Jewish people after seeing the Promised Land, and the other shows his death.

The Last Judgment.

THE LAST JUDGMENT
(Detail, after the fresco by Luca Signorelli.
Orvieto: Duomo)
Anderson
View larger image

THE LAST JUDGMENT
(Detail, after the fresco by Luca Signorelli.
Orvieto: Duomo)
Anderson
View larger image

Finally, having executed works for almost every Prince in Italy, and being now old, he returned to Cortona, where, in those last years of his life, he worked more for pleasure than for any other reason, as one who, being used to labour, neither could nor would stay idle. In this his old age, then, he painted a panel for the Nuns of S. Margherita at Arezzo, and one for the Company of S. Girolamo, which was paid for in part by Messer Niccolò Gamurrini, Doctor of Laws and Auditor of the Ruota,[9] [Pg 75] who is portrayed from life in that panel, kneeling before the Madonna, to whom he is being presented by a S. Nicholas who is in the same panel; there are also S. Donatus and S. Stephen, and lower down a nude S. Jerome, and a David who is singing to a psaltery; and also two prophets, who, as it appears from the scrolls that they have in their hands, are speaking about the Conception. This work was brought from Cortona to Arezzo on the shoulders of the men of that Company; and Luca, old as he was, insisted on coming to set it in place, and partly also in order to revisit his friends and relatives. And since he lodged in the house of the Vasari, in which I then was, a little boy of eight years old, I remember that the good old man, who was most gracious and courteous, having heard from the master who was teaching me my first letters, that I gave my attention to nothing in lesson-time save to drawing figures, I remember, I say, that he turned to my father Antonio and said to him: "Antonio, if you wish little Giorgio not to become backward, by all means let him learn to draw, for, even were he to devote himself to letters, design cannot be otherwise than helpful, honourable, and advantageous to him, as it is to every gentleman." Then, turning to me, who was standing in front of him, he said: "Mind your lessons, little kinsman." He said many other things about me, which I withhold, for the reason that I know that I have failed by a great measure to justify the opinion which the good old man had of me. And since he heard, as was true, that the blood used to flow from my nose at that age in such quantities that this left me sometimes half dead, with infinite lovingness he bound a jasper round my neck with his own hand; and this memory of Luca will stay for ever fixed in my mind. The said panel set in place, he returned to Cortona, accompanied for a great part of the way by many citizens, friends, and relatives, as was due to the excellence of Luca, who always lived rather as a noble and a man of rank than as a painter.

Finally, after working for almost every prince in Italy and now old, he returned to Cortona, where in the last years of his life he focused more on painting for enjoyment than for any other reason, as someone who, having been accustomed to hard work, could neither stay idle nor wanted to. In his old age, he painted a panel for the Nuns of S. Margherita in Arezzo, and another for the Company of S. Girolamo, which was partially funded by Messer Niccolò Gamurrini, Doctor of Laws and Auditor of the Ruota,[9] [Pg 75] who is depicted in that panel, kneeling before the Madonna, to whom he is being presented by a S. Nicholas also featured in the same panel; there are also S. Donatus and S. Stephen, and further down, a nude S. Jerome, along with a David who is playing a psaltery; and two prophets, who, as indicated by the scrolls they hold, are discussing the Conception. This work was transported from Cortona to Arezzo on the shoulders of the company's men; and Luca, despite his age, insisted on coming to install it, partly to reconnect with his friends and relatives. Since he stayed with the Vasaris, in whose house I was then an eight-year-old boy, I remember that the kind old man, who was very gracious and polite, upon hearing from my teacher that I focused only on drawing during lessons, turned to my father Antonio and said: "Antonio, if you want little Giorgio not to fall behind, definitely let him learn to draw, because even if he devotes himself to academics, knowing how to draw will always be beneficial, honorable, and advantageous for him, as it is for every gentleman." Then, looking at me standing in front of him, he said: "Pay attention to your lessons, little cousin." He spoke many other things about me, which I choose not to share, as I know I've significantly failed to live up to the good old man's expectations. And as he heard that, indeed, I used to have such severe nosebleeds at that age that they sometimes left me half dead, he lovingly put a jasper around my neck with his own hands; and this memory of Luca will always remain embedded in my mind. Once the panel was installed, he returned to Cortona, accompanied for much of the way by many citizens, friends, and relatives, which was fitting given Luca’s excellence, as he lived more like a nobleman and a person of high status than like a painter.

About the same time a palace had been built for Cardinal Silvio Passerini of Cortona, half a mile beyond the city, by Benedetto Caporali, a painter of Perugia, who, delighting in architecture, had written a commentary on Vitruvius a short time before; and the said Cardinal determined to have almost the whole of it painted. Wherefore [Pg 76] Benedetto, putting his hand to this with the aid of Maso Papacello of Cortona (who was his disciple and had also learnt not a little from Giulio Romano, as will be told), of Tommaso, and of other disciples and lads, did not cease until he had painted it almost all over in fresco. But the Cardinal wishing to have some painting by the hand of Luca as well, he, old as he was, and hindered by palsy, painted in fresco, on the altar-wall of the chapel of that palace, the scene of S. John the Baptist baptizing the Saviour; but he was not able to finish it completely, for while still working at it he died, having reached the age of eighty-two.

Around the same time, a palace was built for Cardinal Silvio Passerini of Cortona, half a mile outside the city, by Benedetto Caporali, a painter from Perugia, who had a passion for architecture and had recently written a commentary on Vitruvius. The Cardinal decided to have almost all of it painted. So, [Pg 76] Benedetto, with the help of Maso Papacello of Cortona (his student who had also learned quite a bit from Giulio Romano, as will be mentioned), Tommaso, and other students and assistants, worked tirelessly until he had almost completely covered it in fresco. However, the Cardinal wanted some artwork by Luca as well. Despite his old age and being hindered by palsy, Luca painted a fresco on the altar wall of the chapel in that palace, depicting St. John the Baptist baptizing the Savior. Unfortunately, he wasn’t able to finish it because he passed away while still working on it, having lived to the age of eighty-two.

Luca was a man of most excellent character, true and loving with his friends, sweet and amiable in his dealings with every man, and, above all, courteous to all who had need of him, and kindly in teaching his disciples. He lived splendidly, and he took delight in clothing himself well. And for these good qualities he was ever held in the highest veneration both in his own country and abroad.

Luca was a man of outstanding character, loyal and loving with his friends, kind and friendly in his interactions with everyone, and, above all, respectful to all who needed his help, as well as generous in teaching his disciples. He lived well and enjoyed dressing elegantly. Because of these qualities, he was always respected and admired both in his homeland and beyond.

And so, with the end of this master's life, which was in 1521, we will bring to an end the Second Part of these Lives; concluding with Luca, as the man who, with his profound mastery of design, particularly in nudes, and with his grace in invention and in the composition of scenes, opened to the majority of craftsmen the way to the final perfection of art, to which those men who followed were afterwards enabled to add the crown, of whom we are henceforward to speak.

And so, with the end of this master’s life in 1521, we will conclude the Second Part of these Lives, finishing with Luca, who, through his deep expertise in design—especially in nudes—and his graceful inventions and scene compositions, paved the way for most craftsmen toward the ultimate perfection of art, which those who came after him were then able to enhance even further, and about whom we will now speak.

[Pg 77] THE THIRD PART OF THE LIVES OF THE SCULPTORS, PAINTERS, AND ARCHITECTS, WHO HAVE LIVED FROM CIMABUE TO OUR OWN DAY. WRITTEN BY MESSER GIORGIO VASARI, PAINTER AND ARCHITECT OF AREZZO

[Pg 77] THE THIRD PART OF THE LIVES OF THE SCULPTORS, PAINTERS, AND ARCHITECTS, WHO HAVE LIVED FROM CIMABUE TO OUR OWN DAY. WRITTEN BY MESSER GIORGIO VASARI, PAINTER AND ARCHITECT OF AREZZO


[Pg 79] PREFACE TO THE THIRD PART

Truly great was the advancement conferred on the arts of architecture, painting, and sculpture by those excellent masters of whom we have written hitherto, in the Second Part of these Lives, for to the achievements of the early masters they added rule, order, proportion, draughtsmanship, and manner; not, indeed, in complete perfection, but with so near an approach to the truth that the masters of the third age, of whom we are henceforward to speak, were enabled, by means of their light, to aspire still higher and attain to that supreme perfection which we see in the most highly prized and most celebrated of our modern works. But to the end that the nature of the improvement brought about by the aforesaid craftsmen may be even more clearly understood, it will certainly not be out of place to explain in a few words the five additions that I have named, and to give a succinct account of the origin of that true excellence which, having surpassed the age of the ancients, makes the modern so glorious.

The progress made in architecture, painting, and sculpture by the incredible masters we've discussed in the Second Part of these Lives was truly remarkable. They added rules, structure, proportion, drawing skills, and style to the accomplishments of the earlier artists. Though not perfectly executed, their work came so close to the truth that the masters of the next era, whom we will discuss from now on, were inspired by their achievements to aim even higher and reach that ultimate excellence we see in the most esteemed and famous modern works. To better understand the improvements brought about by these craftsmen, it’s worthwhile to briefly explain the five contributions I’ve mentioned and provide a concise overview of the true excellence that, having surpassed the ancients, makes the modern era so remarkable.

Rule, then, in architecture, was the process of taking measurements from antiquities and studying the ground-plans of ancient edifices for the construction of modern buildings. Order was the separating of one style from another, so that each body should receive its proper members, with no more interchanging between Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Tuscan. Proportion was the universal law applying both to architecture and to sculpture, that all bodies should be made correct and true, with the members in proper harmony; and so, also, in painting. Draughtsmanship was the imitation of the most beautiful parts of nature in all figures, whether in sculpture or in painting; and for this it is necessary to have a hand and a brain able to reproduce with absolute accuracy [Pg 80] and precision, on a level surface—whether by drawing on paper, or on panel, or on some other level surface—everything that the eye sees; and the same is true of relief in sculpture. Manner then attained to the greatest beauty from the practice which arose of constantly copying the most beautiful objects, and joining together these most beautiful things, hands, heads, bodies, and legs, so as to make a figure of the greatest possible beauty. This practice was carried out in every work for all figures, and for that reason it is called the beautiful manner.

Rule in architecture was the process of taking measurements from ancient structures and analyzing the layouts of old buildings to create modern designs. Order was about distinguishing one style from another, ensuring that each form received its appropriate elements without mixing Doric, Ionic, Corinthian, and Tuscan styles. Proportion was the universal principle that applied to both architecture and sculpture, ensuring that all forms were made accurate and true, with components in proper harmony; the same applied to painting. Draftsmanship involved replicating the most beautiful aspects of nature in all figures, whether in sculpture or painting; for this, it was essential to have a skilled hand and mind to reproduce everything the eye sees with complete accuracy and precision on a flat surface—whether by drawing on paper, on a panel, or another flat medium—and the same goes for relief in sculpture. Style, then, reached its highest beauty through the practice of consistently copying the most beautiful objects and combining these lovely elements—hands, heads, bodies, and legs—to create a figure of the utmost beauty. This practice was applied to every work for all figures, which is why it’s referred to as the beautiful manner.

These things had not been done by Giotto or by the other early craftsmen, although they had discovered the rudiments of all these difficulties, and had touched them on the surface; as in their drawing, which was sounder and more true to nature than it had been before, and likewise in harmony of colouring and in the grouping of figures in scenes, and in many other respects of which enough has been said. Now although the masters of the second age improved our arts greatly with regard to all the qualities mentioned above, yet these were not made by them so perfect as to succeed in attaining to complete perfection, for there was wanting in their rule a certain freedom which, without being of the rule, might be directed by the rule and might be able to exist without causing confusion or spoiling the order; which order had need of an invention abundant in every respect, and of a certain beauty maintained in every least detail, so as to reveal all that order with more adornment. In proportion there was wanting a certain correctness of judgment, by means of which their figures, without having been measured, might have, in due relation to their dimensions, a grace exceeding measurement. In their drawing there was not the perfection of finish, because, although they made an arm round and a leg straight, the muscles in these were not revealed with that sweet and facile grace which hovers midway between the seen and the unseen, as is the case with the flesh of living figures; nay, they were crude and excoriated, which made them displeasing to the eye and gave hardness to the manner. This last was wanting in the delicacy that comes from making all figures light and graceful, particularly those of women and children, with the limbs true to nature, as in the case of men, but veiled with a plumpness and fleshiness [Pg 81] that should not be awkward, as they are in nature, but refined by draughtsmanship and judgment. They also lacked our abundance of beautiful costumes, our great number and variety of bizarre fancies, loveliness of colouring, wide knowledge of buildings, and distance and variety in landscapes. And although many of them, such as Andrea Verrocchio and Antonio del Pollaiuolo, and many others more modern, began to seek to make their figures with more study, so as to reveal in them better draughtsmanship, with a degree of imitation more correct and truer to nature, nevertheless the whole was not yet there, even though they had one very certain assurance—namely, that they were advancing towards the good, and their figures were thus approved according to the standard of the works of the ancients, as was seen when Andrea Verrocchio restored in marble the legs and arms of the Marsyas in the house of the Medici in Florence. But they lacked a certain finish and finality of perfection in the feet, hands, hair, and beards, although the limbs as a whole are in accordance with the antique and have a certain correct harmony in the proportions. Now if they had had that minuteness of finish which is the perfection and bloom of art, they would also have had a resolute boldness in their works; and from this there would have followed delicacy, refinement, and supreme grace, which are the qualities produced by the perfection of art in beautiful figures, whether in relief or in painting; but these qualities they did not have, although they give proof of diligent striving. That finish, and that certain something that they lacked, they could not achieve so readily, seeing that study, when it is used in that way to obtain finish, gives dryness to the manner.

These things hadn’t been accomplished by Giotto or other early artists, even though they had uncovered the basics of all these challenges and only scratched the surface. Their drawings were more accurate and true to nature than ever before, and they showed improvements in color harmony and the arrangement of figures in scenes, along with many other aspects that have already been discussed. While the masters of the next era greatly enhanced our arts in terms of all these qualities, they didn’t achieve complete perfection. What was missing in their approach was a certain freedom that, while not being part of the rules, could be guided by them without causing chaos or disrupting order. That order required an abundance of invention in every aspect and a consistent beauty in every detail, to highlight that order with more embellishment. Additionally, they lacked a certain correctness of judgment, which would allow their figures to possess a grace that exceeded standard measurements even without being explicitly measured. Their drawings weren’t perfectly finished, as, although they depicted arms round and legs straight, the muscles weren’t shown with that sweet and effortless grace that lies between the seen and unseen, as with the flesh of living figures; instead, they appeared harsh and raw, making them unappealing and giving their style a stiffness. This final aspect missed the delicacy that comes from making all figures light and graceful, particularly those of women and children, with limbs true to nature like men, yet enhanced with a softness and fleshiness that shouldn’t appear awkward, but rather refined through skill and judgment. They also didn’t have our abundance of beautiful costumes, our large number and variety of quirky ideas, lovely coloring, extensive knowledge of architecture, and varied landscapes. Although many, like Andrea Verrocchio and Antonio del Pollaiuolo, among many others from more recent times, began to focus on making their figures with more precision to better showcase their drawing skills, aiming for more accurate imitation of nature, the complete picture was still not there. However, they had a clear confidence—they were progressing towards quality, and their figures were thus recognized based on the standards of ancient works, as seen when Andrea Verrocchio restored the legs and arms of Marsyas in the Medici house in Florence. Still, they fell short of a certain finish and completeness in the feet, hands, hair, and beards, although the limbs overall aligned with the ancient style and displayed correct harmony in proportions. If they had achieved that level of detail that embodies the perfection and vitality of art, they would have also exhibited boldness in their works; from that, elegance, refinement, and supreme grace would have emerged, qualities produced by the mastery of art in beautiful figures, whether in relief or painting. However, they lacked these qualities, even though they showed evidence of hard work. That finish and elusive quality they missed could not be easily achieved, as the kind of study required for that level of finish can render the style overly dry.

After them, indeed, their successors were enabled to attain to it through seeing excavated out of the earth certain antiquities cited by Pliny as amongst the most famous, such as the Laocoon, the Hercules, the Great Torso of the Belvedere, and likewise the Venus, the Cleopatra, the Apollo, and an endless number of others, which, both with their sweetness and their severity, with their fleshy roundness copied from the greatest beauties of nature, and with certain attitudes which involve no distortion of the whole figure but only a movement of certain parts, and [Pg 82] are revealed with a most perfect grace, brought about the disappearance of a certain dryness, hardness, and sharpness of manner, which had been left to our art by the excessive study of Piero della Francesca, Lazzaro Vasari, Alesso Baldovinetti, Andrea dal Castagno, Pesello, Ercole Ferrarese, Giovanni Bellini, Cosimo Rosselli, the Abbot of S. Clemente, Domenico del Ghirlandajo, Sandro Botticelli, Andrea Mantegna, Filippo, and Luca Signorelli. These masters sought with great efforts to do the impossible in art by means of labour, particularly in foreshortenings and in things unpleasant to the eye, which were as painful to see as they were difficult for them to execute. And although their works were for the most part well drawn and free from errors, yet there was wanting a certain resolute spirit which was never seen in them, and that sweet harmony of colouring which the Bolognese Francia and Pietro Perugino first began to show in their works; at the sight of which people ran like madmen to this new and more lifelike beauty, for it seemed to them quite certain that nothing better could ever be done. But their error was afterwards clearly proved by the works of Leonardo da Vinci, who, giving a beginning to that third manner which we propose to call the modern—besides the force and boldness of his drawing, and the extreme subtlety wherewith he counterfeited all the minutenesses of nature exactly as they are—with good rule, better order, right proportion, perfect drawing, and divine grace, abounding in resources and having a most profound knowledge of art, may be truly said to have endowed his figures with motion and breath.

After them, their successors were able to achieve it by uncovering certain ancient artifacts mentioned by Pliny as among the most notable, such as the Laocoon, the Hercules, the Great Torso of the Belvedere, along with the Venus, Cleopatra, Apollo, and countless others. These artworks, with their beauty and strength, their fleshy roundness modeled after the greatest beauties of nature, and their poses that don’t distort the entire figure but only involve movements of specific parts, [Pg 82] are displayed with perfect grace, which helped eliminate a certain dryness, hardness, and sharpness in style that our art had inherited from the intense study of Piero della Francesca, Lazzaro Vasari, Alesso Baldovinetti, Andrea dal Castagno, Pesello, Ercole Ferrarese, Giovanni Bellini, Cosimo Rosselli, the Abbot of S. Clemente, Domenico del Ghirlandajo, Sandro Botticelli, Andrea Mantegna, Filippo, and Luca Signorelli. These masters worked hard to achieve the impossible in art, particularly in foreshortenings and in aspects that were unpleasant to the eye, which were as difficult to see as they were to create. Although their works were mostly well drawn and free of mistakes, they lacked a certain decisive spirit that was never present in them, along with the sweet harmony of color that the Bolognese Francia and Pietro Perugino first began to exhibit in their works; people rushed to this new and more lifelike beauty, believing it was certain that nothing better could ever be produced. However, their mistake was later clearly shown by the works of Leonardo da Vinci, who initiated what we propose to call the modern style—alongside the strength and boldness of his drawing, and the extreme subtlety with which he captured all the details of nature just as they are—with good technique, better composition, appropriate proportion, flawless drawing, and divine grace, richly resourceful and possessing profound knowledge of art, he truly gifted his figures with motion and breath.

There followed after him, although at some distance, Giorgione da Castelfranco, who obtained a beautiful gradation of colour in his pictures, and gave a sublime movement to his works by means of a certain darkness of shadow, very well conceived; and not inferior to him in giving force, relief, sweetness, and grace to his pictures, with his colouring, was Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco. But more than all did the most gracious Raffaello da Urbino, who, studying the labours of the old masters and those of the modern, took the best from them, and, having gathered it together, enriched the art of painting with that complete perfection which was shown in ancient times by the figures of Apelles and Zeuxis; [Pg 83] nay, even more, if we may make bold to say it, as might be proved if we could compare their works with his. Wherefore nature was left vanquished by his colours; and his invention was facile and peculiar to himself, as may be perceived by all who see his painted stories, which are as vivid as writings, for in them he showed us places and buildings true to reality, and the features and costumes both of our own people and of strangers, according to his pleasure; not to mention his gift of imparting grace to the heads of young men, old men, and women, reserving modesty for the modest, wantonness for the wanton, and for children now mischief in their eyes, now playfulness in their attitudes; and the folds of his draperies, also, are neither too simple nor too intricate, but of such a kind that they appear real.

After him, though at a distance, came Giorgione da Castelfranco, who achieved a beautiful range of colors in his paintings and gave a sublime energy to his works through a well-conceived dark shadow. Not far behind him in creating strength, depth, sweetness, and grace in his pictures with his color was Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco. But above all, the most charming Raffaello da Urbino, who studied the work of both the old masters and contemporary artists, took the best from each, and having blended it together, enriched the art of painting with a level of perfection that rivaled the figures created by Apelles and Zeuxis. Indeed, perhaps even more so, if we dare to say so, as could be proven if we could compare their works to his. Consequently, nature was left defeated by his colors; and his creativity was unique and distinctive, as anyone who looks at his painted stories can see. They are as vivid as writings, showcasing places and buildings true to life, as well as the features and clothing of both locals and foreigners, according to his vision. Not to mention his ability to convey grace in the faces of young men, old men, and women, showing modesty for the modest, seduction for the wanton, and for children, at times mischief in their eyes and at other times playfulness in their postures; and the folds in his draperies are neither too simple nor too complicated, but just realistic enough to seem genuine.

In the same manner, but sweeter in colouring and not so bold, there followed Andrea del Sarto, who may be called a rare painter, for his works are free from errors. Nor is it possible to describe the charming vivacity seen in the works of Antonio da Correggio, who painted hair in detail, not in the precise manner used by the masters before him, which was constrained, sharp, and dry, but soft and feathery, with each single hair visible, such was his facility in making them; and they seemed like gold and more beautiful than real hair, which is surpassed by that which he painted.

Similarly, but with a softer tone and less intensity, Andrea del Sarto came next, a truly unique painter because his works are flawless. It's hard to capture the delightful energy in the paintings of Antonio da Correggio, who portrayed hair in a way that was different from the stiff, sharp, and dry style of the masters before him. Instead, he painted hair in a soft and feathery manner, making each strand visible with an ease that made it look almost like gold—more beautiful than actual hair, which his artwork outshone.

The same did Francesco Mazzuoli of Parma, who excelled him in many respects in grace, adornment, and beauty of manner, as may be seen in many of his pictures, which smile on whoever beholds them; and even as there is a perfect illusion of sight in the eyes, so there is perceived the beating of the pulse, according as it best pleased his brush. But whosoever shall consider the mural paintings of Polidoro and Maturino, will see figures in attitudes that seem beyond the bounds of possibility, and he will wonder with amazement how it can be possible, not to describe with the tongue, which is easy, but to express with the brush the tremendous conceptions which they put into execution with such mastery and dexterity, in representing the deeds of the Romans exactly as they were.

Francesco Mazzuoli from Parma was just as talented, surpassing him in many ways with his grace, style, and beauty, as shown in many of his paintings that seem to smile back at anyone who looks at them. Just as there's a perfect illusion of sight in the eyes, you can also sense the heartbeat, according to what his brush expressed best. However, anyone who takes a look at the mural paintings by Polidoro and Maturino will see figures in poses that seem impossible, and they'll be amazed at how it’s possible—not just to describe it with words, which is easy, but to convey with a brush the incredible ideas they managed to execute with such skill and precision, portraying the deeds of the Romans just as they were.

And how many there are who, having given life to their figures with [Pg 84] their colours, are now dead, such as Il Rosso, Fra Sebastiano, Giulio Romano, and Perino del Vaga! For of the living, who are known to all through their own efforts, there is no need to speak here. But what most concerns the whole world of art is that they have now brought it to such perfection, and made it so easy for him who possesses draughtsmanship, invention, and colouring, that, whereas those early masters took six years to paint one panel, our modern masters can paint six in one year, as I can testify with the greatest confidence both from seeing and from doing; and our pictures are clearly much more highly finished and perfect than those executed in former times by masters of account.

And how many there are who, having brought their work to life with their colors, are now gone, like Il Rosso, Fra Sebastiano, Giulio Romano, and Perino del Vaga! As for the living artists who are recognized for their own talents, there's no need to mention them here. But what truly matters to the entire art world is that they have elevated it to such a level of perfection and made it so accessible for those who have skills in drawing, creativity, and color. While those early masters took six years to paint a single panel, our modern artists can paint six in just one year, as I can firmly attest from both observation and practice; and our artworks are clearly much more refined and perfect than those made in the past by well-known masters.

But he who bears the palm from both the living and the dead, transcending and eclipsing all others, is the divine Michelagnolo Buonarroti, who holds the sovereignty not merely of one of these arts, but of all three together. This master surpasses and excels not only all those moderns who have almost vanquished nature, but even those most famous ancients who without a doubt did so gloriously surpass her; and in his own self he triumphs over moderns, ancients, and nature, who could scarcely conceive anything so strange and so difficult that he would not be able, by the force of his most divine intellect and by means of his industry, draughtsmanship, art, judgment, and grace, to excel it by a great measure; and that not only in painting and in the use of colour, under which title are comprised all forms, and all bodies upright or not upright, palpable or impalpable, visible or invisible, but also in the highest perfection of bodies in the round, with the point of his chisel. And from a plant so beautiful and so fruitful, through his labours, there have already spread branches so many and so noble, that, besides having filled the world in such unwonted profusion with the most luscious fruits, they have also given the final form to these three most noble arts. And so great and so marvellous is his perfection, that it may be safely and surely said that his statues are in all their parts much more beautiful than the ancient; for if we compare the heads, hands, arms, and feet shaped by the one with those of the others, we see in his a greater depth and solidity, a grace more completely graceful, and a much more absolute perfection, accomplished with a manner so facile in the overcoming of [Pg 85] difficulties, that it is not possible ever to see anything better. And the same may be believed of his pictures, which; if we chanced to have some by the most famous Greeks and Romans, so that we might compare them face to face, would prove to be as much higher in value and more noble as his sculptures are clearly superior to all those of the ancients.

But the one who stands out above both the living and the dead, surpassing and outshining everyone else, is the divine Michelangelo Buonarroti. He dominates not just one of these arts, but all three combined. This master excels not only beyond all the moderns who have almost conquered nature but even those most renowned ancients who undeniably surpassed her gloriously. In himself, he triumphs over moderns, ancients, and nature, who could scarcely conceive of anything so strange and difficult that he wouldn't be able to exceed it by a significant margin, thanks to the strength of his divine intellect and his skill in drawing, artistry, judgment, and grace. He excels not only in painting and the use of color, which encompass all forms and all bodies, whether upright or not, tangible or intangible, visible or invisible, but also in the highest perfection of three-dimensional bodies with his chisel. From such a beautiful and fruitful source, his efforts have already produced so many noble branches that they have filled the world with an extraordinary abundance of the most delightful fruits and have given the final shape to these three most noble arts. So great and remarkable is his perfection that it's safe to say his statues are, in every detail, much more beautiful than the ancients'. If we compare the heads, hands, arms, and feet he shaped with those of the others, we see in his work a greater depth and solidity, a grace that is truly graceful, and an absolute perfection achieved with such ease in overcoming [Pg 85] challenges that nothing better can ever be seen. The same can be thought of his paintings, which, if we were to have some from the most famous Greeks and Romans for comparison, would prove to be as much higher in value and more noble as his sculptures clearly surpass all those of the ancients.

But if we admire so greatly those most famous masters who, spurred by such extraordinary rewards and by such good-fortune, gave life to their works, how much more should we not celebrate and exalt to the heavens those rare intellects who, not only without reward, but in miserable poverty, bring forth fruits so precious? We must believe and declare, then, that if, in this our age, there were a due meed of remuneration, there would be without a doubt works greater and much better than were ever wrought by the ancients. But the fact that they have to grapple more with famine than with fame, keeps our hapless intellects submerged, and, to the shame and disgrace of those who could raise them up but give no thought to it, prevents them from becoming known.

But if we admire the most famous masters who, driven by incredible rewards and good fortune, brought their works to life, how much more should we celebrate and uplift to the skies those rare minds who, not only without rewards but in dire poverty, produce such precious results? We must believe and say that if, in our time, there were a fair amount of compensation, there would undoubtedly be works greater and far better than anything the ancients created. However, the fact that they struggle more with hunger than with recognition keeps our unfortunate minds hidden, and, to the shame of those who could help them but don’t think about it, prevents them from being known.

And let this be enough to have said on this subject; for it is now time to return to the Lives, and to treat in detail of all those who have executed famous works in this third manner, the creator of which was Leonardo da Vinci, with whom we will now begin.

And let this be all we say on this topic; it's now time to return to the Lives and discuss in detail all those who have done famous work in this third style, created by Leonardo da Vinci, with whom we will start now.


[Pg 87] LEONARDO DA VINCI


[Pg 89] LIFE OF LEONARDO DA VINCI[10]

PAINTER AND SCULPTOR OF FLORENCE

The greatest gifts are often seen, in the course of nature, rained by celestial influences on human creatures; and sometimes, in supernatural fashion, beauty, grace, and talent are united beyond measure in one single person, in a manner that to whatever such an one turns his attention, his every action is so divine, that, surpassing all other men, it makes itself clearly known as a thing bestowed by God (as it is), and not acquired by human art. This was seen by all mankind in Leonardo da Vinci, in whom, besides a beauty of body never sufficiently extolled, there was an infinite grace in all his actions; and so great was his genius, and such its growth, that to whatever difficulties he turned his mind, he solved them with ease. In him was great bodily strength, joined to dexterity, with a spirit and courage ever royal and magnanimous; and the fame of his name so increased, that not only in his lifetime was he held in esteem, but his reputation became even greater among posterity after his death.

The greatest gifts often come from the universe, showered upon us by celestial forces. Sometimes, in a supernatural way, beauty, grace, and talent come together in a single person so perfectly that everything they do seems divine. This is so remarkable that it clearly appears as a gift from God, rather than something simply learned through skill. This was evident in Leonardo da Vinci, who not only had a body that deserved more praise than it received but also an incredible grace in everything he did. His genius was so vast that he easily solved any challenge he faced. He possessed great physical strength combined with skill, along with a spirit and bravery that were truly noble. His reputation grew so much that he was highly regarded during his lifetime, and even more so among future generations after his death.

Truly marvellous and celestial was Leonardo, the son of Ser Piero da Vinci; and in learning and in the rudiments of letters he would have made great proficience, if he had not been so variable and unstable, for he set himself to learn many things, and then, after having begun them, abandoned them. Thus, in arithmetic, during the few months that he studied it, he made so much progress, that, by continually suggesting [Pg 90] doubts and difficulties to the master who was teaching him, he would very often bewilder him. He gave some little attention to music, and quickly resolved to learn to play the lyre, as one who had by nature a spirit most lofty and full of refinement: wherefore he sang divinely to that instrument, improvising upon it. Nevertheless, although he occupied himself with such a variety of things, he never ceased drawing and working in relief, pursuits which suited his fancy more than any other. Ser Piero, having observed this, and having considered the loftiness of his intellect, one day took some of his drawings and carried them to Andrea del Verrocchio, who was much his friend, and besought him straitly to tell him whether Leonardo, by devoting himself to drawing, would make any proficience. Andrea was astonished to see the extraordinary beginnings of Leonardo, and urged Ser Piero that he should make him study it; wherefore he arranged with Leonardo that he should enter the workshop of Andrea, which Leonardo did with the greatest willingness in the world. And he practised not one branch of art only, but all those in which drawing played a part; and having an intellect so divine and marvellous that he was also an excellent geometrician, he not only worked in sculpture, making in his youth, in clay, some heads of women that are smiling, of which plaster casts are still taken, and likewise some heads of boys which appeared to have issued from the hand of a master; but in architecture, also, he made many drawings both of ground-plans and of other designs of buildings; and he was the first, although but a youth, who suggested the plan of reducing the river Arno to a navigable canal from Pisa to Florence. He made designs of flour-mills, fulling-mills, and engines, which might be driven by the force of water: and since he wished that his profession should be painting, he studied much in drawing after nature, and sometimes in making models of figures in clay, over which he would lay soft pieces of cloth dipped in clay, and then set himself patiently to draw them on a certain kind of very fine Rheims cloth, or prepared linen: and he executed them in black and white with the point of his brush, so that it was a marvel, as some of them by his hand, which I have in our book of drawings, still bear witness; besides which, he drew on paper with such diligence and so well, that there is [Pg 91] no one who has ever equalled him in perfection of finish; and I have one, a head drawn with the style in chiaroscuro, which is divine.

Truly amazing and otherworldly was Leonardo, the son of Ser Piero da Vinci; and in his studies and the basics of reading and writing, he could have excelled greatly if he hadn't been so inconsistent and wavering. He tried to learn many things, but after starting them, he would often give up. For example, in arithmetic, during the short time he studied it, he made such progress that by constantly asking questions and raising challenges to his teacher, he would frequently leave him confused. He paid some attention to music and quickly decided to learn to play the lyre, as someone who naturally had a high and refined spirit; that's why he sang beautifully to that instrument, improvising as he went. However, despite exploring all these different interests, he never stopped drawing and working on relief sculptures, activities that suited his preferences more than anything else. Ser Piero, noticing this and appreciating the greatness of his intellect, one day took some of his drawings to Andrea del Verrocchio, a close friend, and earnestly asked him whether Leonardo would make any progress by focusing on drawing. Andrea was amazed by the extraordinary beginnings of Leonardo's work and urged Ser Piero to have him study it; consequently, he arranged for Leonardo to join Andrea's workshop, which Leonardo did with great eagerness. He practiced not just one form of art, but all those related to drawing; possessing such a brilliant and remarkable mind, he also became an excellent mathematician. He not only worked in sculpture, creating in his youth some clay heads of smiling women, which still have plaster casts made from them, and heads of boys that seemed to come from the hand of a master, but also made many designs in architecture, including floor plans and other building designs. He was the first, despite being young, to propose the idea of making the Arno River into a navigable canal from Pisa to Florence. He drew up designs for flour mills, fulling mills, and machines that could be powered by water. Since he wished to pursue painting as his profession, he studied drawing from nature and occasionally made models of figures in clay, covering them with soft pieces of cloth dipped in clay, and then patiently drew them on a type of very fine Rheims cloth or prepared linen. He executed them in black and white with the tip of his brush, to such a degree that it was astonishing; some of them, which I have in our collection of drawings, still attest to his skill. In addition, he drew on paper with such diligence and precision that there is no one who has ever matched him in the perfection of finish; I have one piece, a head drawn in chiaroscuro style, which is divine.

And there was infused in that brain such grace from God, and a power of expression in such sublime accord with the intellect and memory that served it, and he knew so well how to express his conceptions by draughtsmanship, that he vanquished with his discourse, and confuted with his reasoning, every valiant wit. And he was continually making models and designs to show men how to remove mountains with ease, and how to bore them in order to pass from one level to another; and by means of levers, windlasses, and screws, he showed the way to raise and draw great weights, together with methods for emptying harbours, and pumps for removing water from low places, things which his brain never ceased from devising; and of these ideas and labours many drawings may be seen, scattered abroad among our craftsmen; and I myself have seen not a few. He even went so far as to waste his time in drawing knots of cords, made according to an order, that from one end all the rest might follow till the other, so as to fill a round; and one of these is to be seen in stamp, most difficult and beautiful, and in the middle of it are these words, "Leonardus Vinci Accademia." And among these models and designs, there was one by which he often demonstrated to many ingenious citizens, who were then governing Florence, how he proposed to raise the Temple of S. Giovanni in Florence, and place steps under it, without damaging the building; and with such strong reasons did he urge this, that it appeared possible, although each man, after he had departed, would recognize for himself the impossibility of so vast an undertaking.

And that brain was infused with such grace from God, and a way of expressing ideas that aligned perfectly with the intellect and memory that supported it. He knew exactly how to convey his thoughts through drawing, which allowed him to outsmart and outreason every clever mind. He was always creating models and designs to show people how to easily move mountains and how to bore through them to connect different levels. Using levers, winches, and screws, he revealed ways to lift and pull heavy weights, as well as methods for emptying harbors and pumps to remove water from low areas—things his mind never stopped inventing. Many of these ideas and works can be found in drawings scattered among our craftsmen, and I've seen quite a few myself. He even spent time drawing cord knots designed so that from one end, all the others would follow to the other end, creating a complete circle; one of these is stamped, beautifully intricate and challenging, with the words, "Leonardus Vinci Accademia" in the center. Among these models and designs, there was one where he frequently demonstrated to many clever citizens governing Florence how he planned to elevate the Temple of S. Giovanni in Florence and add steps beneath it without damaging the building. He presented such convincing arguments that it seemed doable, even though each person, once he left, would realize the impossibility of such a grand project.

He was so pleasing in conversation, that he attracted to himself the hearts of men. And although he possessed, one might say, nothing, and worked little, he always kept servants and horses, in which latter he took much delight, and particularly in all other animals, which he managed with the greatest love and patience; and this he showed when often passing by the places where birds were sold, for, taking them with his own hand out of their cages, and having paid to those who sold them the price that was asked, he let them fly away into the air, restoring to [Pg 92] them their lost liberty. For which reason nature was pleased so to favour him, that, wherever he turned his thought, brain, and mind, he displayed such divine power in his works, that, in giving them their perfection, no one was ever his peer in readiness, vivacity, excellence, beauty, and grace.

He was so charming in conversation that he won over the hearts of everyone. Even though he seemed to have little and worked very little, he always had servants and horses, taking great joy in the latter

It is clear that Leonardo, through his comprehension of art, began many things and never finished one of them, since it seemed to him that the hand was not able to attain to the perfection of art in carrying out the things which he imagined; for the reason that he conceived in idea difficulties so subtle and so marvellous, that they could never be expressed by the hands, be they ever so excellent. And so many were his caprices, that, philosophizing of natural things, he set himself to seek out the properties of herbs, going on even to observe the motions of the heavens, the path of the moon, and the courses of the sun.

It's clear that Leonardo, with his understanding of art, started many projects but never finished any of them, because he felt that his hands couldn't achieve the perfection of art in realizing what he imagined. He envisioned challenges that were so intricate and extraordinary that they could never be captured by even the most skilled hands. He had so many whims that, in pondering the natural world, he began to explore the properties of plants, studying the movements of the heavens, the moon's path, and the courses of the sun.

He was placed, then, as has been said, in his boyhood, at the instance of Ser Piero, to learn art with Andrea del Verrocchio, who was making a panel-picture of S. John baptizing Christ, when Leonardo painted an angel who was holding some garments; and although he was but a lad, Leonardo executed it in such a manner that his angel was much better than the figures of Andrea; which was the reason that Andrea would never again touch colour, in disdain that a child should know more than he.

He was put, as mentioned before, in his childhood, at the request of Ser Piero, to study art with Andrea del Verrocchio, who was creating a panel painting of St. John baptizing Christ, when Leonardo painted an angel holding some clothes. Even though he was just a kid, Leonardo painted it in such a way that his angel looked much better than Andrea's figures. This was why Andrea would never paint again, feeling disgusted that a child could outshine him.

The Baptism in Jordan.

ANDREA VERROCCHIO: THE BAPTISM IN JORDAN
(Florence: Accademia, 71. Panel)
View larger image

ANDREA VERROCCHIO: THE BAPTISM IN JORDAN
(Florence: Accademia, 71. Panel)
View larger image

He was commissioned to make a cartoon for a door-hanging that was to be executed in Flanders, woven in gold and silk, to be sent to the King of Portugal, of Adam and Eve sinning in the Earthly Paradise; wherein Leonardo drew with the brush in chiaroscuro, with the lights in lead-white, a meadow of infinite kinds of herbage, with some animals, of which, in truth, it may be said that for diligence and truth to nature divine wit could not make it so perfect. In it is the fig-tree, together with the foreshortening of the leaves and the varying aspects of the branches, wrought with such lovingness that the brain reels at the mere thought how a man could have such patience. There is also a palm-tree which has the radiating crown of the palm, executed with such great and marvellous art that nothing save the patience and intellect of Leonardo could avail to do it. This work was carried no farther; wherefore the cartoon is now at Florence, in the blessed house of the Magnificent [Pg 93] Ottaviano de' Medici, presented to him not long ago by the uncle of Leonardo.

He was asked to create a cartoon for a door hanging that was to be made in Flanders, woven with gold and silk, to be sent to the King of Portugal, depicting Adam and Eve sinning in the Garden of Eden. Leonardo painted with brushes using chiaroscuro techniques, highlighting a meadow filled with all kinds of grasses and some animals. Honestly, it can be said that with his diligence and natural talent, divine inspiration couldn't have made it more perfect. It features a fig tree, along with the angled leaves and varied shapes of the branches, crafted with such care that it’s hard to believe how someone could have such patience. There’s also a palm tree with its radiating crown, created with such incredible skill that only Leonardo's patience and intellect could achieve it. This work wasn’t completed; thus, the cartoon is now in Florence, in the esteemed home of the Magnificent [Pg 93] Ottaviano de' Medici, recently gifted to him by Leonardo's uncle.

It is said that Ser Piero da Vinci, being at his villa, was besought as a favour, by a peasant of his, who had made a buckler with his own hands out of a fig-tree that he had cut down on the farm, to have it painted for him in Florence, which he did very willingly, since the countryman was very skilful at catching birds and fishing, and Ser Piero made much use of him in these pursuits. Thereupon, having had it taken to Florence, without saying a word to Leonardo as to whose it was, he asked him to paint something upon it. Leonardo, having one day taken this buckler in his hands, and seeing it twisted, badly made, and clumsy, straightened it by the fire, and, having given it to a turner, from the rude and clumsy thing that it was, caused it to be made smooth and even. And afterwards, having given it a coat of gesso, and having prepared it in his own way, he began to think what he could paint upon it, that might be able to terrify all who should come upon it, producing the same effect as once did the head of Medusa. For this purpose, then, Leonardo carried to a room of his own into which no one entered save himself alone, lizards great and small, crickets, serpents, butterflies, grasshoppers, bats, and other strange kinds of suchlike animals, out of the number of which, variously put together, he formed a great ugly creature, most horrible and terrifying, which emitted a poisonous breath and turned the air to flame; and he made it coming out of a dark and jagged rock, belching forth venom from its open throat, fire from its eyes, and smoke from its nostrils, in so strange a fashion that it appeared altogether a monstrous and horrible thing; and so long did he labour over making it, that the stench of the dead animals in that room was past bearing, but Leonardo did not notice it, so great was the love that he bore towards art. The work being finished, although it was no longer asked for either by the countryman or by his father, Leonardo told the latter that he might send for the buckler at his convenience, since, for his part, it was finished. Ser Piero having therefore gone one morning to the room for the buckler, and having knocked at the door, Leonardo opened to him, telling him to wait a little; and, having gone back into the room, he adjusted the [Pg 94] buckler in a good light on the easel, and put to the window, in order to make a soft light, and then he bade him come in to see it. Ser Piero, at the first glance, taken by surprise, gave a sudden start, not thinking that that was the buckler, nor merely painted the form that he saw upon it, and, falling back a step, Leonardo checked him, saying, "This work serves the end for which it was made; take it, then, and carry it away, since this is the effect that it was meant to produce." This thing appeared to Ser Piero nothing short of a miracle, and he praised very greatly the ingenious idea of Leonardo; and then, having privately bought from a pedlar another buckler, painted with a heart transfixed by an arrow, he presented it to the countryman, who remained obliged to him for it as long as he lived. Afterwards, Ser Piero sold the buckler of Leonardo secretly to some merchants in Florence, for a hundred ducats; and in a short time it came into the hands of the Duke of Milan, having been sold to him by the said merchants for three hundred ducats.

It’s said that Ser Piero da Vinci, while at his villa, was approached by a peasant who had made a shield with his own hands from a fig tree he had cut down on the farm. The peasant asked if Ser Piero could have it painted in Florence, which he happily agreed to since the farmer was very skilled at catching birds and fishing, making him useful to Ser Piero in those activities. So, without telling Leonardo whose shield it was, he took it to Florence and asked him to paint something on it. One day, when Leonardo picked up the shield and saw it was twisted, poorly made, and clumsy, he straightened it out by the fire. He then gave it to a lathe worker, turning the rough, awkward object into a smooth and even piece. After applying a layer of gesso and preparing it in his own way, he started to think about what to paint on it that could scare anyone who saw it, similar to the head of Medusa. To achieve this, Leonardo took lizards, crickets, snakes, butterflies, grasshoppers, bats, and other strange creatures into a private room that only he entered. Combining these various animals, he created a large, terrifying monster that breathed poison and turned the air to fire. He depicted it emerging from a dark, jagged rock, spewing venom from its open mouth, fire from its eyes, and smoke from its nostrils in such a way that it looked completely monstrous. He worked on it for so long that the smell of the dead animals in that room became unbearable, but Leonardo didn’t notice because of his intense love for art. Once finished, even though neither the peasant nor his father asked for it again, Leonardo told the father he could pick up the shield whenever he liked, as it was complete. So, one morning, Ser Piero went to the room for the shield and knocked on the door. Leonardo opened it and told him to wait a moment. He went back inside, adjusted the [Pg 94] shield in a good light on the easel, positioned it by the window for softer light, and then invited him in to see it. At first glance, Ser Piero was taken by surprise and stepped back, not realizing it was the shield, nor that what he saw was just a painted image. Leonardo stopped him and said, “This work serves the purpose it was made for; take it and carry it away, as this is the effect it was meant to create.” Ser Piero found this nothing short of a miracle and praised Leonardo’s clever idea greatly. Later, he secretly bought another shield from a peddler, painted with a heart pierced by an arrow, and gifted it to the peasant, who was grateful to him for it for the rest of his life. Afterwards, Ser Piero sold Leonardo’s shield secretly to some merchants in Florence for a hundred ducats, and soon it ended up in the hands of the Duke of Milan, having been sold to him by those merchants for three hundred ducats.

Leonardo then made a picture of Our Lady, a most excellent work, which was in the possession of Pope Clement VII; and, among other things painted therein, he counterfeited a glass vase full of water, containing some flowers, in which, besides its marvellous naturalness, he had imitated the dew-drops on the flowers, so that it seemed more real than the reality. For Antonio Segni, who was very much his friend, he made, on a sheet of paper, a Neptune executed with such careful draughtsmanship that it seemed absolutely alive. In it one saw the ocean troubled, and Neptune's car drawn by sea-horses, with fantastic creatures, marine monsters and winds, and some very beautiful heads of sea-gods. This drawing was presented by Fabio, the son of Antonio, to Messer Giovanni Gaddi, with this epigram:

Leonardo then created a painting of Our Lady, which was an outstanding piece held by Pope Clement VII. Among other elements, he depicted a glass vase filled with water and flowers, capturing such amazing realism that the dew drops on the flowers looked more real than reality itself. For his close friend, Antonio Segni, he made a drawing of Neptune with such skillful precision that it appeared completely alive. In it, the ocean was tumultuous, and Neptune’s chariot was pulled by sea horses, featuring fantastical creatures, marine monsters, and winds, along with some beautiful depictions of sea gods. This drawing was given by Fabio, Antonio's son, to Messer Giovanni Gaddi, accompanied by this epigram:

Pinxit Virgilius Neptunum, pinxit Homerus,
Dum maris undisoni per vada flectit equos.
Mente quidem vates illum conspexit uterque,
Vincius ast oculis; jureque vincit eos.

Pinxit Virgilius Neptunum, pinxit Homerus,
As he navigates his horses through the rough sea.
In their minds, both poets saw him,
But in reality, he's better; and that's what he deserves.

The Adoration of the Magi.

THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the panel by Leonardo da Vinci.
Florence: Uffizi, 1252)
Anderson
View larger image

THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the panel by Leonardo da Vinci.
Florence: Uffizi, 1252)
Anderson
View larger image

The fancy came to him to paint a picture in oils of the head of a Medusa, with the head attired with a coil of snakes, the most strange [Pg 95] and extravagant invention that could ever be imagined; but since it was a work that took time, it remained unfinished, as happened with almost all his things. It is among the rare works of art in the Palace of Duke Cosimo, together with the head of an angel, who is raising one arm in the air, which, coming forward, is foreshortened from the shoulder to the elbow, and with the other he raises the hand to the breast.

The idea came to him to create an oil painting of Medusa's head, decorated with a twist of snakes, the most bizarre and extravagant concept ever imagined; but since it was a project that required time, it was left unfinished, just like nearly all his other works. It is one of the rare pieces of art in the Palace of Duke Cosimo, alongside the head of an angel, who raises one arm in the air, appearing foreshortened from the shoulder to the elbow, while the other hand is lifted to the breast.

It is an extraordinary thing how that genius, in his desire to give the highest relief to the works that he made, went so far with dark shadows, in order to find the darkest possible grounds, that he sought for blacks which might make deeper shadows and be darker than other blacks, that by their means he might make his lights the brighter; and in the end this method turned out so dark, that, no light remaining there, his pictures had rather the character of things made to represent an effect of night, than the clear quality of daylight; which all came from seeking to give greater relief, and to achieve the final perfection of art.

It's amazing how that genius, in his quest to highlight his creations, went to great lengths with dark shadows to find the deepest possible blacks. He searched for blacks that could create even deeper shadows and be darker than other blacks, using them to make his lights appear brighter. In the end, this approach became so dark that, with no light left in the images, his works looked more like representations of night rather than the bright quality of daylight. All of this came from his drive to enhance relief and reach the ultimate perfection in art.

He was so delighted when he saw certain bizarre heads of men, with the beard or hair growing naturally, that he would follow one that pleased him a whole day, and so treasured him up in idea, that afterwards, on arriving home, he drew him as if he had had him in his presence. Of this sort there are many heads to be seen, both of women and of men, and I have several of them, drawn by his hand with the pen, in our book of drawings, which I have mentioned so many times; such was that of Amerigo Vespucci, which is a very beautiful head of an old man drawn with charcoal, and likewise that of Scaramuccia, Captain of the Gypsies, which afterwards came into the hands of M. Donato Valdambrini of Arezzo, Canon of S. Lorenzo, left to him by Giambullari.

He was so thrilled when he saw some strange faces of men, with their beards or hair growing naturally, that he would follow one he liked for an entire day, and he would keep a mental image of that person, so that later, when he got home, he could draw them as if he had been looking at them. There are many such heads to be seen, both of women and men, and I have several of them, drawn by his hand with a pen, in our collection of drawings, which I’ve mentioned many times; one of them is of Amerigo Vespucci, which is a very beautiful portrait of an old man sketched with charcoal, and also that of Scaramuccia, Captain of the Gypsies, which later ended up in the hands of M. Donato Valdambrini of Arezzo, Canon of S. Lorenzo, left to him by Giambullari.

He began a panel-picture of the Adoration of the Magi, containing many beautiful things, particularly the heads, which was in the house of Amerigo Benci, opposite the Loggia de' Peruzzi; and this, also, remained unfinished, like his other works.

He started a panel painting of the Adoration of the Magi, featuring many beautiful elements, especially the heads, which was in the home of Amerigo Benci, across from the Loggia de' Peruzzi; and this, too, remained unfinished, like his other works.

It came to pass that Giovan Galeazzo, Duke of Milan, being dead, and Lodovico Sforza raised to the same rank, in the year 1494, Leonardo was summoned to Milan in great repute to the Duke, who took much delight in the sound of the lyre, to the end that he might play it: and [Pg 96] Leonardo took with him that instrument which he had made with his own hands, in great part of silver, in the form of a horse's skull—a thing bizarre and new—in order that the harmony might be of greater volume and more sonorous in tone; with which he surpassed all the musicians who had come together there to play. Besides this, he was the best improviser in verse of his day. The Duke, hearing the marvellous discourse of Leonardo, became so enamoured of his genius, that it was something incredible: and he prevailed upon him by entreaties to paint an altar-panel containing a Nativity, which was sent by the Duke to the Emperor.

After Giovan Galeazzo, Duke of Milan, died and Lodovico Sforza took over in 1494, Leonardo was invited to Milan with high regard by the Duke, who really enjoyed the sound of the lyre and wanted him to play it. [Pg 96] Leonardo brought along an instrument he had crafted himself, mostly out of silver, shaped like a horse's skull—something unusual and innovative—so that the sound would be richer and more powerful. With this, he outperformed all the other musicians gathered there. In addition, he was considered the best improvised poet of his time. The Duke, captivated by Leonardo's amazing talent, couldn't believe how impressed he was and persuaded him through requests to paint an altar-panel depicting a Nativity scene, which the Duke then sent to the Emperor.

He also painted in Milan, for the Friars of S. Dominic, at S. Maria delle Grazie, a Last Supper, a most beautiful and marvellous thing; and to the heads of the Apostles he gave such majesty and beauty, that he left the head of Christ unfinished, not believing that he was able to give it that divine air which is essential to the image of Christ. This work, remaining thus all but finished, has ever been held by the Milanese in the greatest veneration, and also by strangers as well; for Leonardo imagined and succeeded in expressing that anxiety which had seized the Apostles in wishing to know who should betray their Master. For which reason in all their faces are seen love, fear, and wrath, or rather, sorrow, at not being able to understand the meaning of Christ; which thing excites no less marvel than the sight, in contrast to it, of obstinacy, hatred, and treachery in Judas; not to mention that every least part of the work displays an incredible diligence, seeing that even in the tablecloth the texture of the stuff is counterfeited in such a manner that linen itself could not seem more real.

He also painted in Milan for the Friars of S. Dominic at S. Maria delle Grazie, creating a Last Supper, which is a truly beautiful and marvelous piece. He infused the Apostles' faces with such majesty and beauty that he left Christ's head unfinished, not believing he could capture the divine essence necessary for Christ's image. This nearly completed work has always been revered by the people of Milan and by outsiders too; Leonardo managed to convey the anxiety felt by the Apostles as they questioned who would betray their Master. Thus, love, fear, and sadness can be seen in their faces as they struggle to understand Christ's meaning, which is just as astonishing as the contrasting expressions of stubbornness, hatred, and treachery in Judas. Moreover, every detail of the work shows incredible craftsmanship; even the texture of the tablecloth is replicated so well that it seems more real than actual linen.

The Last Supper.

THE LAST SUPPER
(After the oil fresco by Leonardo da Vinci.
Milan: S. Maria delle Grazie)
M.S.
View larger image

THE LAST SUPPER
(After the oil fresco by Leonardo da Vinci.
Milan: S. Maria delle Grazie)
M.S.
View larger image

It is said that the Prior of that place kept pressing Leonardo, in a most importunate manner, to finish the work; for it seemed strange to him to see Leonardo sometimes stand half a day at a time, lost in contemplation, and he would have liked him to go on like the labourers hoeing in his garden, without ever stopping his brush. And not content with this, he complained of it to the Duke, and that so warmly, that he was constrained to send for Leonardo and delicately urged him to work, contriving nevertheless to show him that he was doing all this because [Pg 97] of the importunity of the Prior. Leonardo, knowing that the intellect of that Prince was acute and discerning, was pleased to discourse at large with the Duke on the subject, a thing which he had never done with the Prior: and he reasoned much with him about art, and made him understand that men of lofty genius sometimes accomplish the most when they work the least, seeking out inventions with the mind, and forming those perfect ideas which the hands afterwards express and reproduce from the images already conceived in the brain. And he added that two heads were still wanting for him to paint; that of Christ, which he did not wish to seek on earth; and he could not think that it was possible to conceive in the imagination that beauty and heavenly grace which should be the mark of God incarnate. Next, there was wanting that of Judas, which was also troubling him, not thinking himself capable of imagining features that should represent the countenance of him who, after so many benefits received, had a mind so cruel as to resolve to betray his Lord, the Creator of the world. However, he would seek out a model for the latter; but if in the end he could not find a better, he should not want that of the importunate and tactless Prior. This thing moved the Duke wondrously to laughter, and he said that Leonardo had a thousand reasons on his side. And so the poor Prior, in confusion, confined himself to urging on the work in the garden, and left Leonardo in peace, who finished only the head of Judas, which seems the very embodiment of treachery and inhumanity; but that of Christ, as has been said, remained unfinished. The nobility of this picture, both because of its design, and from its having been wrought with an incomparable diligence, awoke a desire in the King of France to transport it into his kingdom; wherefore he tried by all possible means to discover whether there were architects who, with cross-stays of wood and iron, might have been able to make it so secure that it might be transported safely; without considering any expense that might have been involved thereby, so much did he desire it. But the fact of its being painted on the wall robbed his Majesty of his desire; and the picture remained with the Milanese. In the same refectory, while he was working at the Last Supper, on the end wall where is a Passion in the old manner, Leonardo portrayed the [Pg 98] said Lodovico, with Massimiliano, his eldest son; and, on the other side, the Duchess Beatrice, with Francesco, their other son, both of whom afterwards became Dukes of Milan; and all are portrayed divinely well.

It’s said that the Prior of that place kept urging Leonardo, quite insistently, to finish the work; it seemed strange to him to see Leonardo sometimes standing for half a day, lost in thought, and he preferred that he worked like the laborers hoeing in his garden, without ever stopping to paint. Not satisfied with this, he complained to the Duke so passionately that the Duke had to summon Leonardo and gently encouraged him to work, making sure to show him that he was doing this because of the Prior's insistence. Knowing that the Duke was sharp and perceptive, Leonardo enjoyed discussing the topic with him, something he’d never done with the Prior. He talked extensively about art and helped the Duke understand that people of great talent often achieve the most when they do the least, exploring ideas mentally and developing those perfect concepts that the hands later express and reproduce based on images already formed in the mind. He added that he still needed two heads to paint; one was that of Christ, which he didn’t want to seek out on Earth, as he couldn’t believe it was possible to imagine the beauty and divine grace that should represent God incarnate. Next was Judas’s head, which also troubled him, as he felt incapable of imagining the features that would represent the face of someone who, after receiving so many benefits, could cruelly decide to betray his Lord, the Creator of the world. However, he would look for a model for Judas; but if he ultimately couldn’t find a better one, he wouldn’t hesitate to use that of the demanding and clueless Prior. This amused the Duke greatly, and he remarked that Leonardo had a thousand valid reasons. Thus, the embarrassed Prior focused on urging the garden work along and left Leonardo in peace, who finished only the head of Judas, which seems to embody treachery and cruelty; meanwhile, the head of Christ, as mentioned, remained unfinished. The quality of this painting, both due to its design and the remarkable care taken in its creation, sparked the King of France’s desire to move it to his kingdom; he tried by every means to find out if there were architects who could create wooden and iron supports that would secure it for safe transportation, not caring about any costs involved, so eager was he to have it. But the fact that it was painted on the wall dashed his Majesty's hopes; the painting stayed with the people of Milan. In the same dining hall, while he was working on the Last Supper, on the end wall featuring an older style Passion, Leonardo painted Lodovico alongside his eldest son Massimiliano; on the other side, painted the Duchess Beatrice with their other son Francesco, both of whom later became Dukes of Milan; and all are depicted beautifully.

While he was engaged on this work, he proposed to the Duke to make a horse in bronze, of a marvellous greatness, in order to place upon it, as a memorial, the image of the Duke. And on so vast a scale did he begin it and continue it, that it could never be completed. And there are those who have been of the opinion (so various and so often malign out of envy are the judgments of men) that he began it with no intention of finishing it, because, being of so great a size, an incredible difficulty was encountered in seeking to cast it in one piece; and it might also be believed that, from the result, many may have formed such a judgment, since many of his works have remained unfinished. But, in truth, one can believe that his vast and most excellent mind was hampered through being too full of desire, and that his wish ever to seek out excellence upon excellence, and perfection upon perfection, was the reason of it. "Tal che l' opera fosse ritardata dal desio," as our Petrarca has said. And, indeed, those who saw the great model that Leonardo made in clay vow that they have never seen a more beautiful thing, or a more superb; and it was preserved until the French came to Milan with King Louis of France, and broke it all to pieces. Lost, also, is a little model of it in wax, which was held to be perfect, together with a book on the anatomy of the horse made by him by way of study.

While he was working on this project, he suggested to the Duke that they create a massive bronze horse to serve as a memorial featuring the Duke's image. He started and continued it on such a grand scale that it could never be completed. Some people believe—often out of envy—that he started it with no real intention of finishing because casting it in one piece was extremely difficult given its size. This idea may have been reinforced by the fact that many of his works remained unfinished. However, honestly, it seems more likely that his brilliant and ambitious mind was overwhelmed by his desire for greater and greater excellence and perfection. "Tal che l' opera fosse ritardata dal desio," as our Petrarch said. Indeed, those who saw the great clay model that Leonardo made claimed they had never seen anything so beautiful or impressive; it was preserved until the French arrived in Milan with King Louis of France, who shattered it completely. Also lost was a small wax model of it, considered perfect, along with a book on horse anatomy that he created as part of his studies.

The Madonna and Child with S. Anne.

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. ANNE
(After the cartoon by Leonardo da Vinci.
London: Burlington House)
Vasari Society
View larger image

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. ANNE
(Inspired by the drawing by Leonardo da Vinci.
London: Burlington House)
Vasari Society
View larger image

He then applied himself, but with greater care, to the anatomy of man, assisted by and in turn assisting, in this research, Messer Marc' Antonio della Torre, an excellent philosopher, who was then lecturing at Pavia, and who wrote of this matter; and he was one of the first (as I have heard tell) that began to illustrate the problems of medicine with the doctrine of Galen, and to throw true light on anatomy, which up to that time had been wrapped in the thick and gross darkness of ignorance. And in this he found marvellous aid in the brain, work, and hand of Leonardo, who made a book drawn in red chalk, and annotated with the pen, of the bodies that he dissected with his own hand, and drew with the greatest diligence; wherein he showed all the frame of the [Pg 99] bones; and then added to them, in order, all the nerves, and covered them with muscles; the first attached to the bone, the second that hold the body firm, and the third that move it; and beside them, part by part, he wrote in letters of an ill-shaped character, which he made with the left hand, backwards; and whoever is not practised in reading them cannot understand them, since they are not to be read save with a mirror. Of these papers on the anatomy of man, a great part is in the hands of Messer Francesco da Melzo, a gentleman of Milan, who in the time of Leonardo was a very beautiful boy, and much beloved by him, and now is a no less beautiful and gentle old man; and he holds them dear, and keeps such papers together as if they were relics, in company with the portrait of Leonardo of happy memory; and to all who read these writings, it seems impossible that that divine spirit should have discoursed so well of art, and of the muscles, nerves, and veins, and with such diligence of everything. So, also, there are in the hands of ——,[11] a painter of Milan, certain writings of Leonardo, likewise in characters written with the left hand, backwards, which treat of painting, and of the methods of drawing and colouring. This man, not long ago, came to Florence to see me, wishing to print this work, and he took it to Rome, in order to put it into effect; but I do not know what may afterwards have become of it.

He then focused more carefully on human anatomy, working alongside and supporting Messer Marc' Antonio della Torre, a brilliant philosopher who was lecturing at Pavia and wrote about this subject. He was one of the first (as I've heard) to start shedding light on medical issues using Galen’s teachings and to clarify anatomy, which had until then been shrouded in deep and dense ignorance. He received incredible support from Leonardo, who created a book in red chalk, annotated by hand, documenting the bodies he dissected. He drew with meticulous detail, illustrating the entire structure of the bones, and then systematically added all the nerves, covering them with muscles—the first attached to the bone, the second holding the body steady, and the third enabling movement. Next to them, part by part, he wrote in poorly formed letters made with his left hand, backwards; anyone not skilled at reading them cannot understand the text, as it can only be read with a mirror. A large portion of these anatomical papers is in the possession of Messer Francesco da Melzo, a gentleman from Milan, who was a very handsome boy and much loved by Leonardo in his time, and now he is equally charming and gentle as an older man. He cherishes these papers, keeping them like relics along with a portrait of the dearly remembered Leonardo; to everyone who reads these writings, it seems incredible that such a divine spirit could speak so well about art, muscles, nerves, veins, and tackle every detail with such diligence. Similarly, there are writings by Leonardo in the hands of [11], a painter from Milan, also written in backward characters with the left hand, discussing painting and techniques for drawing and coloring. This man recently came to Florence to see me, wanting to publish this work, and took it to Rome to carry it out; however, I don’t know what happened to it afterwards.

And to return to the works of Leonardo; there came to Milan, in his time, the King of France, wherefore Leonardo being asked to devise some bizarre thing, made a lion which walked several steps and then opened its breast, and showed it full of lilies.

And to go back to the works of Leonardo; during his time, the King of France visited Milan, and Leonardo was asked to create something unusual. He made a lion that walked a few steps before opening its chest to reveal it was full of lilies.

In Milan he took for his assistant the Milanese Salai, who was most comely in grace and beauty, having fine locks, curling in ringlets, in which Leonardo greatly delighted; and he taught him many things of art; and certain works in Milan, which are said to be by Salai, were retouched by Leonardo.

In Milan, he chose the Milanese Salai as his assistant, who was very attractive and graceful, with beautiful, curly hair that Leonardo found delightful. He taught him a lot about art, and some works in Milan that are attributed to Salai were touched up by Leonardo.

He returned to Florence, where he found that the Servite Friars had entrusted to Filippino the painting of the panel for the high-altar of the Nunziata; whereupon Leonardo said that he would willingly have [Pg 100] done such a work. Filippino, having heard this, like the amiable fellow that he was, retired from the undertaking; and the friars, to the end that Leonardo might paint it, took him into their house, meeting the expenses both of himself and of all his household; and thus he kept them in expectation for a long time, but never began anything. In the end, he made a cartoon containing a Madonna and a S. Anne, with a Christ, which not only caused all the craftsmen to marvel, but, when it was finished, men and women, young and old, continued for two days to flock for a sight of it to the room where it was, as if to a solemn festival, in order to gaze at the marvels of Leonardo, which caused all those people to be amazed; for in the face of that Madonna was seen whatever of the simple and the beautiful can by simplicity and beauty confer grace on a picture of the Mother of Christ, since he wished to show that modesty and that humility which are looked for in an image of the Virgin, supremely content with gladness at seeing the beauty of her Son, whom she was holding with tenderness in her lap, while with most chastened gaze she was looking down at S. John, as a little boy, who was playing with a lamb; not without a smile from S. Anne, who, overflowing with joy, was beholding her earthly progeny become divine—ideas truly worthy of the brain and genius of Leonardo. This cartoon, as will be told below, afterwards went to France. He made a portrait of Ginevra d' Amerigo Benci, a very beautiful work; and abandoned the work for the friars, who restored it to Filippino; but he, also, failed to finish it, having been overtaken by death.

He returned to Florence, where he learned that the Servite Friars had asked Filippino to paint the panel for the high altar of the Nunziata. Leonardo mentioned that he would have gladly done such a piece. Filippino, hearing this, kindly stepped aside from the project; and the friars, wanting Leonardo to paint it, welcomed him into their house, covering the expenses for himself and his entire household. He kept them waiting for a long time but never actually started anything. In the end, he created a cartoon depicting a Madonna, St. Anne, and Christ, which left all the craftsmen in awe. When it was finished, people of all ages flocked to see it for two days as if attending a grand festival, captivated by the wonders of Leonardo, which amazed everyone. In the face of that Madonna, one could see all that simplicity and beauty can bring to a picture of the Mother of Christ, as he intended to portray the modesty and humility expected in an image of the Virgin, blissfully gazing at the beauty of her Son, whom she held tenderly in her lap, while looking down at St. John, a little boy, playing with a lamb; not without a smile from St. Anne, who, filled with joy, was watching her earthly child become divine—thoughts truly worthy of Leonardo's mind and genius. This cartoon, as will be detailed later, eventually went to France. He also created a portrait of Ginevra d'Amerigo Benci, a very beautiful piece, and abandoned the work for the friars, who returned it to Filippino; but he, too, failed to finish it, having passed away.

Leonardo undertook to execute, for Francesco del Giocondo, the portrait of Monna Lisa, his wife; and after toiling over it for four years, he left it unfinished; and the work is now in the collection of King Francis of France, at Fontainebleau. In this head, whoever wished to see how closely art could imitate nature, was able to comprehend it with ease; for in it were counterfeited all the minutenesses that with subtlety are able to be painted, seeing that the eyes had that lustre and watery sheen which are always seen in life, and around them were all those rosy and pearly tints, as well as the lashes, which cannot be represented without the greatest subtlety. The eyebrows, through his having shown [Pg 101] the manner in which the hairs spring from the flesh, here more close and here more scanty, and curve according to the pores of the skin, could not be more natural. The nose, with its beautiful nostrils, rosy and tender, appeared to be alive. The mouth, with its opening, and with its ends united by the red of the lips to the flesh-tints of the face, seemed, in truth, to be not colours but flesh. In the pit of the throat, if one gazed upon it intently, could be seen the beating of the pulse. And, indeed, it may be said that it was painted in such a manner as to make every valiant craftsman, be he who he may, tremble and lose heart. He made use, also, of this device: Monna Lisa being very beautiful, he always employed, while he was painting her portrait, persons to play or sing, and jesters, who might make her remain merry, in order to take away that melancholy which painters are often wont to give to the portraits that they paint. And in this work of Leonardo's there was a smile so pleasing, that it was a thing more divine than human to behold; and it was held to be something marvellous, since the reality was not more alive.

Leonardo took on the task of painting a portrait of Monna Lisa, the wife of Francesco del Giocondo. After working on it for four years, he left it unfinished, and now the piece is part of King Francis of France's collection at Fontainebleau. In this artwork, anyone wanting to see how closely art could mimic nature could easily understand; it captured all the delicate details that can be painted with subtlety, as the eyes had that luster and watery shine seen in real life, and around them were all those rosy and pearl-like tones, along with lashes that require great finesse to represent. The eyebrows showed how the hairs grew from the skin, some areas denser and others more sparse, curving with the skin's pores, making them incredibly lifelike. The nose, with its beautiful, rosy, and soft nostrils, seemed alive. The mouth, with its gentle opening and the way the red of the lips blended into the skin tones of the face, appeared to be not just color but actual flesh. In the hollow of the throat, if one looked closely, the pulse could be seen beating. Indeed, it could be said that it was painted in such a way that any skilled artist would feel intimidated and disheartened. He also used a clever technique: since Monna Lisa was very beautiful, he would always have people play music or sing, and jesters to keep her cheerful, to counteract the melancholy that often appears in painted portraits. This work by Leonardo features a smile so delightful that it felt more divine than human to look at; it was considered something incredible since the reality appeared even more vivid.

By reason, then, of the excellence of the works of this most divine craftsman, his fame had so increased that all persons who took delight in art—nay, the whole city of Florence—desired that he should leave them some memorial, and it was being proposed everywhere that he should be commissioned to execute some great and notable work, whereby the commonwealth might be honoured and adorned by the great genius, grace and judgment that were seen in the works of Leonardo. And it was decided between the Gonfalonier and the chief citizens, the Great Council Chamber having been newly built—the architecture of which had been contrived with the judgment and counsel of Giuliano da San Gallo, Simone Pollaiuolo, called Il Cronaca, Michelagnolo Buonarroti, and Baccio d' Agnolo, as will be related with more detail in the proper places—and having been finished in great haste, it was ordained by public decree that Leonardo should be given some beautiful work to paint; and so the said hall was allotted to him by Piero Soderini, then Gonfalonier of Justice. Whereupon Leonardo, determining to execute this work, began a cartoon in the Sala del Papa, an apartment in S. Maria Novella, representing the story of Niccolò Piccinino, Captain of Duke [Pg 102] Filippo of Milan; wherein he designed a group of horsemen who were fighting for a standard, a work that was held to be very excellent and of great mastery, by reason of the marvellous ideas that he had in composing that battle; seeing that in it rage, fury, and revenge are perceived as much in the men as in the horses, among which two with the fore-legs interlocked are fighting no less fiercely with their teeth than those who are riding them do in fighting for that standard, which has been grasped by a soldier, who seeks by the strength of his shoulders, as he spurs his horse to flight, having turned his body backwards and seized the staff of the standard, to wrest it by force from the hands of four others, of whom two are defending it, each with one hand, and, raising their swords in the other, are trying to sever the staff; while an old soldier in a red cap, crying out, grips the staff with one hand, and, raising a scimitar with the other, furiously aims a blow in order to cut off both the hands of those who, gnashing their teeth in the struggle, are striving in attitudes of the utmost fierceness to defend their banner; besides which, on the ground, between the legs of the horses, there are two figures in foreshortening that are fighting together, and the one on the ground has over him a soldier who has raised his arm as high as possible, that thus with greater force he may plunge a dagger into his throat, in order to end his life; while the other, struggling with his legs and arms, is doing what he can to escape death.

Because of the incredible talent of this divine craftsman, his reputation had grown so much that everyone who loved art—indeed, the entire city of Florence—wanted him to leave behind some kind of legacy. It was being suggested everywhere that he should be commissioned to create an impressive and significant work that would honor and beautify the commonwealth with the great genius, grace, and skill evident in Leonardo's creations. The Gonfalonier and the leading citizens agreed that, with the newly built Great Council Chamber—designed with the expertise of Giuliano da San Gallo, Simone Pollaiuolo (known as Il Cronaca), Michelangelo Buonarroti, and Baccio d'Agnolo, as will be detailed in the appropriate sections—and completed in haste, a public decree was made to grant Leonardo a significant painting project. Consequently, this hall was assigned to him by Piero Soderini, who was then the Gonfalonier of Justice. Thus, Leonardo decided to undertake this project and started a sketch in the Sala del Papa, an area in S. Maria Novella, depicting the story of Niccolò Piccinino, the Captain of Duke Filippo of Milan. In the sketch, he envisioned a group of horsemen battling for a standard, a work widely regarded as exceptional and masterful due to the marvelous ideas he had in composing that scene of battle. Emotion—rage, fury, and revenge—was evident in both the men and the horses, two of which, with their front legs interlocked, were fighting with their teeth as fiercely as their riders were for the standard. This standard was grasped by a soldier who, using his shoulder strength, urged his horse to flee while leaning back and attempting to pull the standard away forcibly from four others. Two of those were defending it, each using one hand to hold on while trying to sever the pole with their swords in the other. An older soldier in a red cap, shouting, held onto the pole with one hand and raised a scimitar with the other, aiming a furious blow to cut off the hands of those who were desperately trying to protect their banner, gnashing their teeth in fierce struggle. Additionally, on the ground, between the horses' legs, two figures were engaged in combat, one on the ground being attacked by a soldier who had raised his arm high to stab a dagger into his throat, desperate to end his life, while the other fought with limbs flailing to escape death.

It is not possible to describe the invention that Leonardo showed in the garments of the soldiers, all varied by him in different ways, and likewise in the helmet-crests and other ornaments; not to mention the incredible mastery that he displayed in the forms and lineaments of the horses, which Leonardo, with their fiery spirit, muscles, and shapely beauty, drew better than any other master. It is said that, in order to draw that cartoon, he made a most ingenious stage, which was raised by contracting it and lowered by expanding. And conceiving the wish to colour on the wall in oils, he made a composition of so gross an admixture, to act as a binder on the wall, that, going on to paint in the said hall, it began to peel off in such a manner that in a short time he abandoned it, seeing it spoiling.

It’s impossible to fully describe the invention that Leonardo displayed in the soldiers' outfits, which he varied in many different ways, as well as in the helmet crests and other decorations. Not to mention the incredible skill he showed in capturing the forms and features of the horses, which he portrayed with their fiery spirit, muscles, and graceful beauty better than any other artist. It’s said that to create that cartoon, he built a clever structure that could be raised by contracting it and lowered by expanding it. Wanting to paint in oils on the wall, he mixed a thick binder for the wall that led to peeling as he painted in that hall, causing him to abandon the project shortly after, as it was getting ruined.

Monna Lisa.

LEONARDO DA VINCI: MONNA LISA
(Formerly Paris: The Louvre, 1601. Canvas on Panel)
View larger image

LEONARDO DA VINCI: MONNA LISA
(Previously Paris: The Louvre, 1601. Canvas on Panel)
View larger image

[Pg 103] Leonardo had very great spirit, and in his every action was most generous. It is said that, going to the bank for the allowance that he used to draw every month from Piero Soderini, the cashier wanted to give him certain paper-packets of pence; but he would not take them, saying in answer, "I am no penny-painter." Having been blamed for cheating Piero Soderini, there began to be murmurings against him; wherefore Leonardo so wrought upon his friends, that he got the money together and took it to Piero to repay him; but he would not accept it.

[Pg 103] Leonardo had an incredible spirit, and he was always very generous in everything he did. It’s said that when he went to the bank to pick up his monthly allowance from Piero Soderini, the cashier tried to give him some packets of coins, but he refused, saying, "I’m not a penny-painter." After being accused of cheating Piero Soderini, people started to whisper against him. So, Leonardo persuaded his friends to help him gather the money and returned it to Piero to repay him, but Piero refused to accept it.

He went to Rome with Duke Giuliano de' Medici, at the election of Pope Leo, who spent much of his time on philosophical studies, and particularly on alchemy; where, forming a paste of a certain kind of wax, as he walked he shaped animals very thin and full of wind, and, by blowing into them, made them fly through the air, but when the wind ceased they fell to the ground. On the back of a most bizarre lizard, found by the vine-dresser of the Belvedere, he fixed, with a mixture of quicksilver, wings composed of scales stripped from other lizards, which, as it walked, quivered with the motion; and having given it eyes, horns, and beard, taming it, and keeping it in a box, he made all his friends, to whom he showed it, fly for fear. He used often to have the guts of a wether completely freed of their fat and cleaned, and thus made so fine that they could have been held in the palm of the hand; and having placed a pair of blacksmith's bellows in another room, he fixed to them one end of these, and, blowing into them, filled the room, which was very large, so that whoever was in it was obliged to retreat into a corner; showing how, transparent and full of wind, from taking up little space at the beginning they had come to occupy much, and likening them to virtue. He made an infinite number of such follies, and gave his attention to mirrors; and he tried the strangest methods in seeking out oils for painting, and varnish for preserving works when painted.

He went to Rome with Duke Giuliano de' Medici for the election of Pope Leo, who spent a lot of his time on philosophical studies, especially on alchemy. He created a paste from a specific type of wax, and as he walked, he shaped very thin, air-filled animals. By blowing into them, he made them fly through the air, but once the wind stopped, they fell to the ground. He attached wings made of scales from other lizards, using a mix of quicksilver, to the back of a strange lizard found by the vineyard worker at the Belvedere. As it walked, the wings quivered, and after giving it eyes, horns, and a beard, he tamed it and kept it in a box, scaring all his friends when he showed it to them. He often had the intestines of a wether completely cleaned and trimmed down so finely they could fit in the palm of his hand. He connected one end of these to a pair of blacksmith's bellows placed in another room. By blowing into them, he filled the large room with air, forcing anyone inside to retreat into a corner. This demonstrated how, being transparent and full of air, they started out small but took up a lot of space, likening them to virtue. He created countless similar oddities and became fascinated by mirrors. He also experimented with strange methods to find oils for painting and varnishes to preserve artworks once painted.

He made at this time, for Messer Baldassarre Turini da Pescia, who was Datary to Pope Leo, a little picture of the Madonna with the Child in her arms, with infinite diligence and art; but whether through the fault of whoever primed the panel with gesso, or because of his innumerable and capricious mixtures of grounds and colours, it is now much [Pg 104] spoilt. And in another small picture he made a portrait of a little boy, which is beautiful and graceful to a marvel; and both of them are now at Pescia, in the hands of Messer Giuliano Turini. It is related that, a work having been allotted to him by the Pope, he straightway began to distil oils and herbs, in order to make the varnish; at which Pope Leo said: "Alas! this man will never do anything, for he begins by thinking of the end of the work, before the beginning."

He created a small painting of the Madonna holding the Child for Messer Baldassarre Turini da Pescia, who was the Datary to Pope Leo. He put a lot of effort and skill into it, but now it's pretty much [Pg 104] ruined, possibly because of the way the panel was prepped with gesso, or due to his countless and unpredictable mixes of paints and grounds. In another small painting, he made a portrait of a little boy that is exceptionally beautiful and graceful. Both pieces are currently in Pescia, owned by Messer Giuliano Turini. It's said that when the Pope assigned him a project, he immediately started distilling oils and herbs to create the varnish, prompting Pope Leo to remark, "Oh no! This guy will never accomplish anything, because he thinks about the end of the project before even starting it."

There was very great disdain between Michelagnolo Buonarroti and him, on account of which Michelagnolo departed from Florence, with the excuse of Duke Giuliano, having been summoned by the Pope to the competition for the façade of S. Lorenzo. Leonardo, understanding this, departed and went into France, where the King, having had works by his hand, bore him great affection; and he desired that he should colour the cartoon of S. Anne, but Leonardo, according to his custom, put him off for a long time with words.

There was a lot of animosity between Michelangelo Buonarroti and him, which led Michelangelo to leave Florence under the pretext of being called by Duke Giuliano, as the Pope wanted him to compete for the façade of S. Lorenzo. Understanding this, Leonardo left and went to France, where the King, who appreciated his works, had a lot of affection for him. The King wanted Leonardo to paint the cartoon of S. Anne, but Leonardo, as usual, kept delaying him with talk.

Finally, having grown old, he remained ill many months, and, feeling himself near to death, asked to have himself diligently informed of the teaching of the Catholic faith, and of the good way and holy Christian religion; and then, with many moans, he confessed and was penitent; and although he could not raise himself well on his feet, supporting himself on the arms of his friends and servants, he was pleased to take devoutly the most holy Sacrament, out of his bed. The King, who was wont often and lovingly to visit him, then came into the room; wherefore he, out of reverence, having raised himself to sit upon the bed, giving him an account of his sickness and the circumstances of it, showed withal how much he had offended God and mankind in not having worked at his art as he should have done. Thereupon he was seized by a paroxysm, the messenger of death; for which reason the King having risen and having taken his head, in order to assist him and show him favour, to the end that he might alleviate his pain, his spirit, which was divine, knowing that it could not have any greater honour, expired in the arms of the King, in the seventy-fifth year of his age.

Finally, after growing old, he was ill for many months, and feeling close to death, he asked to be thoroughly informed about the teachings of the Catholic faith and the good path of the holy Christian religion. Then, with many groans, he confessed and expressed his remorse. Although he couldn’t stand well on his own, leaning on the arms of his friends and servants, he was eager to receive the most holy Sacrament devoutly from his bed. The King, who often visited him with love, then entered the room; therefore, he, out of respect, raised himself to sit on the bed, telling the King about his sickness and its circumstances, explaining how much he had offended God and humanity by not practicing his craft as he should have. Then, he was overtaken by a seizure, the messenger of death. For this reason, the King stood up, took his head in his arms to assist him and show his support, hoping to ease his pain. His divine spirit, knowing it could not receive any greater honor, expired in the King’s arms, in his seventy-fifth year.

Fragment from The Battle of the Standard.

FRAGMENT FROM "THE BATTLE OF THE STANDARD"
(After the cartoon attributed to Leonardo da Vinci.
Oxford: Ashmolean Museum)
Reproduced by permission of the Visitors of the Ashmolean Museum
View larger image

FRAGMENT FROM "THE BATTLE OF THE STANDARD"
(After the cartoon attributed to Leonardo da Vinci.
Oxford: Ashmolean Museum)
Reproduced by permission of the Visitors of the Ashmolean Museum
View larger image

The loss of Leonardo grieved beyond measure all those who had known him, since there was never any one who did so much honour to painting. With the splendour of his aspect, which was very beautiful, [Pg 105] he made serene every broken spirit: and with his words he turned to yea, or nay, every obdurate intention. By his physical force he could restrain any outburst of rage: and with his right hand he twisted the iron ring of a door-bell, or a horse-shoe, as if it were lead. With his liberality he would assemble together and support his every friend, poor or rich, if only he had intellect and worth. He adorned and honoured, in every action, no matter what mean and bare dwelling; wherefore, in truth, Florence received a very great gift in the birth of Leonardo, and an incalculable loss in his death. In the art of painting, he added to the manner of colouring in oils a certain obscurity, whereby the moderns have given great force and relief to their figures. And in statuary, he proved his worth in the three figures of bronze that are over the door of S. Giovanni, on the side towards the north, executed by Giovan Francesco Rustici, but contrived with the advice of Leonardo; which are the most beautiful pieces of casting, the best designed, and the most perfect that have as yet been seen in modern days. By Leonardo we have the anatomy of the horse, and that of man even more complete. And so, on account of all his qualities, so many and so divine, although he worked much more by words than by deeds, his name and fame can never be extinguished; wherefore it was thus said in his praise by Messer Giovan Battista Strozzi:

The loss of Leonardo deeply saddened everyone who knew him, as no one ever honored painting like he did. With his stunning appearance, which was very beautiful, [Pg 105] he lifted the spirits of those who were feeling down; and with his words, he could change any stubborn attitude. His physical strength could hold back any burst of anger: and with his right hand, he could twist the iron ring of a doorbell or a horseshoe as easily as if it were lead. He generously gathered and supported every friend, whether poor or rich, as long as they had intelligence and worth. He decorated and honored every action, regardless of how simple or bare the setting was; indeed, Florence gained a tremendous blessing with Leonardo's birth and suffered an immeasurable loss with his death. In painting, he introduced a certain depth to oil colors, which modern artists have used to give great emphasis and relief to their figures. In sculpture, he showcased his talent with the three bronze figures over the door of S. Giovanni, on the north side, created by Giovan Francesco Rustici but designed with Leonardo’s input; they are the most beautiful castings, best designed, and most perfect pieces seen in contemporary times. From Leonardo, we have the anatomy of the horse, and an even more detailed anatomy of man. Thus, because of all his numerous and divine qualities, even though he worked more with words than actions, his name and fame will never fade; as was noted in his praise by Messer Giovan Battista Strozzi:

Vince costui pur solo
Tutti altri; e vince Fidia e vince Apelle
E tutto il lor vittorioso stuolo.

Vince beats everyone else
He surpasses Fidia and Apelle
And all their victorious crew.

Man and Woman praying.

MAN AND WOMAN PRAYING
(After the panel by Giovan Antonio Boltraffio.
Milan: Brera, 281)
Anderson
View larger image

MAN AND WOMAN PRAYING
(After the panel by Giovan Antonio Boltraffio.
Milan: Brera, 281)
Anderson
View larger image

A disciple of Leonardo was Giovan Antonio Boltraffio of Milan, a person of great skill and understanding, who, in the year 1500, painted with much diligence, for the Church of the Misericordia, without Bologna, a panel in oils containing Our Lady with the Child in her arms, S. John the Baptist, S. Sebastian naked, and the patron who caused it to be executed, portrayed from the life, on his knees—a truly beautiful work, on which he wrote his name, calling himself a disciple of Leonardo. He has made other works, both at Milan and elsewhere; but it must be enough here to have named this, which is the best. Another (of his disciples) was Marco Oggioni, who painted, in S. Maria della Pace, the Passing of Our Lady and the Marriage of Cana in Galilee.

A student of Leonardo was Giovan Antonio Boltraffio from Milan, a highly skilled and knowledgeable artist. In 1500, he diligently painted an oil panel for the Church of the Misericordia, just outside Bologna. The panel features Our Lady holding the Child, Saint John the Baptist, a naked Saint Sebastian, and the patron who commissioned the work, depicted from life on his knees—a truly beautiful piece, on which he wrote his name, identifying himself as a disciple of Leonardo. He created other works in Milan and beyond, but it's enough to mention this one, which is the finest. Another of his students was Marco Oggioni, who painted the Passing of Our Lady and the Marriage at Cana in Galilee in S. Maria della Pace.


[Pg 107] GIORGIONE DA CASTELFRANCO


[Pg 109] LIFE OF GIORGIONE DA CASTELFRANCO

PAINTER OF VENICE

At the same time when Florence was acquiring such fame by reason of the works of Leonardo, no little adornment was conferred on Venice by the talent and excellence of one of her citizens, who surpassed by a great measure not only the Bellini, whom the Venetians held in such esteem, but also every other master who had painted up to that time in that city. This was Giorgio, who was born at Castelfranco in the territory of Treviso, in the year 1478, when the Doge was Giovanni Mozzenigo, brother of Doge Piero. In time, from the nature of his person and from the greatness of his mind, Giorgio came to be called Giorgione; and although he was born from very humble stock, nevertheless he was not otherwise than gentle and of good breeding throughout his whole life. He was brought up in Venice, and took unceasing delight in the joys of love; and the sound of the lute gave him marvellous pleasure, so that in his day he played and sang so divinely that he was often employed for that purpose at various musical assemblies and gatherings of noble persons. He studied drawing, and found it greatly to his taste; and in this nature favoured him so highly, that he, having become enamoured of her beauties, would never represent anything in his works without copying it from life; and so much was he her slave, imitating her continuously, that he acquired the name not only of having surpassed Giovanni and Gentile Bellini, but also of being the rival of the masters who were working in Tuscany and who were the creators of the modern manner. Giorgione had seen some things by the hand of Leonardo with a beautiful gradation of colours, and with extraordinary relief, effected, as has been related, by means of dark shadows; and this manner pleased him so much [Pg 110] that he was for ever studying it as long as he lived, and in oil-painting he imitated it greatly. Taking pleasure in the delights of good work, he was ever selecting, for putting into his pictures, the greatest beauty and the greatest variety that he could find. And nature gave him a spirit so benign, and with this, both in oil-painting and in fresco, he made certain living forms and other things so soft, so well harmonized, and so well blended in the shadows, that many of the excellent masters of his time were forced to confess that he had been born to infuse spirit into figures and to counterfeit the freshness of living flesh better than any other painter, not only in Venice, but throughout the whole world.

At the same time that Florence was gaining fame because of Leonardo's works, Venice was also being enhanced by the talent and skill of one of her own citizens, who greatly surpassed not only the Bellini, whom the Venetians admired so much, but also every other painter who had been active in the city up to that point. This was Giorgio, born in Castelfranco in Treviso in 1478, during the reign of Doge Giovanni Mozzenigo, the brother of Doge Piero. Over time, due to his appearance and remarkable mind, Giorgio became known as Giorgione; and although he came from very humble beginnings, he was always gentle and well-mannered throughout his life. He was raised in Venice and took great joy in the pleasures of love; the sound of the lute brought him immense happiness, so much so that during his time, he played and sang so beautifully that he was often hired for various musical events with noble people. He studied drawing and found it very enjoyable; nature favored him to such a degree that, being captivated by her beauty, he never portrayed anything in his works without drawing from real life. He was so devoted to imitating nature that he earned a reputation for surpassing Giovanni and Gentile Bellini, and even rivaling the masters from Tuscany who were shaping the modern style. Giorgione had seen works by Leonardo that featured a beautiful gradation of colors and extraordinary relief achieved through dark shadows; this style impressed him so much that he studied it throughout his life and imitated it heavily in oil painting. Enjoying the art of creating beautiful works, he consistently chose the greatest beauty and variety for his paintings. Nature endowed him with a remarkably kind spirit, and with this, he created certain living forms and other elements in both oil and fresco that were so soft, well-balanced, and smoothly blended in shadows that many of the leading masters of his time had to admit that he was born to infuse life into figures and replicate the freshness of living flesh better than any other painter, not just in Venice, but across the entire world.

Figures in a Landscape.

GIORGIONE DA CASTELFRANCO: FIGURES IN A LANDSCAPE
(Venice: Prince Giovanelli. Canvas)
View larger image

GIORGIONE DA CASTELFRANCO: FIGURES IN A LANDSCAPE
(Venice: Prince Giovanelli. Canvas)
View larger image

In his youth he executed in Venice many pictures of Our Lady and other portraits from nature, which are very lifelike and beautiful; of which we still have proof in three most beautiful heads in oils by his hand, which are in the study of the Very Reverend Grimani, Patriarch of Aquileia. One represents David—and it is reported to be his own portrait—with long locks reaching to the shoulders, as was the custom of those times; it is so vivacious and so fresh in colouring that it seems to be living flesh, and there is armour on the breast, as there is on the arm with which he is holding the severed head of Goliath. The second is a much larger head, portrayed from nature; one hand is holding the red cap of a commander, and there is a cape of fur, below which is one of the old-fashioned doublets. This is believed to represent some military leader. The third is that of a boy, as beautiful as could be, with fleecy hair. These works demonstrate the excellence of Giorgione, and no less the affection which that great Patriarch has ever borne to his genius, holding them very dear, and that rightly. In Florence, in the house of the sons of Giovanni Borgherini, there is a portrait by his hand of the said Giovanni, taken when he was a young man in Venice, and in the same picture is the master who was teaching him; and there are no two heads to be seen with better touches in the flesh-colours or with more beautiful tints in the shadows. In the house of Anton de' Nobili there is another head of a captain in armour, very lively and spirited, which is said to be one of the captains whom Consalvo Ferrante took with him to Venice when he visited Doge Agostino Barberigo; at which time, it [Pg 111] is related, Giorgione made a portrait of the great Consalvo in armour, which was a very rare work, insomuch that there was no more beautiful painting than this to be seen, and Consalvo took it away with him. Giorgione made many other portraits which are scattered throughout many parts of Italy; all very beautiful, as may be believed from that of Leonardo Loredano, painted by Giorgione when Leonardo was Doge, which I saw exhibited on one Ascension day, when I seemed to see that most illustrious Prince alive. There is also one at Faenza, in the house of Giovanni da Castel Bolognese, an excellent engraver of cameos and crystals; which work, executed for his father-in-law, is truly divine, since there is such a harmony in the gradation of the colours that it appears to be rather in relief than painted.

In his youth, he created many paintings of Our Lady and other lifelike portraits in Venice that are remarkably beautiful. We still have proof of this in three stunning oil heads by his hand, which are in the study of the Very Reverend Grimani, Patriarch of Aquileia. One portrays David—reportedly his own likeness—with long hair reaching his shoulders, as was the fashion of the time; it is so vivid and fresh in color that it seems to represent real flesh, and he wears armor on his chest and on the arm that holds the severed head of Goliath. The second is a much larger head, painted from a live model; one hand holds the red cap of a commander, and he wears a fur cape over an old-fashioned doublet. This is thought to depict some military leader. The third is a beautiful boy with fluffy hair. These works showcase Giorgione's brilliance and the affection that the great Patriarch has always had for his genius, holding them in high regard, which is well-deserved. In Florence, at the house of Giovanni Borgherini's sons, there is a portrait of Giovanni himself, painted when he was a young man in Venice; it also includes the master who taught him, and no two heads have better flesh tones or more beautiful shadow tints. In Anton de' Nobili's house, there's another lively and spirited head of a captain in armor, said to be one of the captains whom Consalvo Ferrante brought with him to Venice when he visited Doge Agostino Barberigo. At that time, it [Pg 111] is said that Giorgione painted a portrait of the great Consalvo in armor, which was an exceptional work, so beautiful that there was nothing more stunning to be seen, and Consalvo took it with him. Giorgione made many other portraits that can be found in various parts of Italy, all very beautiful, as evidenced by the one of Leonardo Loredano, painted by Giorgione when Leonardo was Doge, which I saw displayed on an Ascension Day, making it seem as if that illustrious Prince were alive. There's also one in Faenza, at Giovanni da Castel Bolognese's house, an excellent engraver of cameos and crystals; this work, created for his father-in-law, is truly divine, showcasing such harmony in the gradual color transitions that it appears more like a relief than a painting.

Giorgione took much delight in painting in fresco, and one among many works that he executed was the whole of a façade of the Ca Soranzo on the Piazza di S. Polo; wherein, besides many pictures and scenes and other things of fancy, there may be seen a picture painted in oils on the plaster, a work which has withstood rain, sun, and wind, and has remained fresh up to our own day. There is also a Spring, which appears to me to be one of the most beautiful works that he painted in fresco, and it is a great pity that time has consumed it so cruelly. For my part, I know nothing that injures works in fresco more than the sirocco, and particularly near the sea, where it always brings a salt moisture with it.

Giorgione really enjoyed painting in fresco, and one of the many pieces he created was the entire façade of the Ca Soranzo on the Piazza di S. Polo. This façade features a variety of images, scenes, and whimsical elements, including an oil painting on the plaster that has survived rain, sun, and wind, remaining vibrant to this day. There’s also a Spring, which I believe is one of his most beautiful fresco works, and it’s a real shame that time has taken such a toll on it. In my opinion, nothing damages frescoes more than the sirocco, especially near the coast, where it always carries a salty moisture.

There broke out at Venice, in the year 1504, in the Fondaco de' Tedeschi by the Ponte del Rialto, a most terrible fire, which consumed the whole building and all the merchandise, to the very great loss of the merchants; wherefore the Signoria of Venice ordained that it should be rebuilt anew, and it was speedily finished with more accommodation in the way of living-rooms, and with greater magnificence, adornment, and beauty. Thereupon, the fame of Giorgione having grown great, it was ordained after deliberation by those who had charge of the matter, that Giorgione should paint it in fresco with colours according to his own fancy, provided only that he gave proof of his genius and executed an excellent work, since it would be in the most beautiful place and most conspicuous site in the city. And so Giorgione put his hand to the work, [Pg 112] but thought of nothing save of making figures according to his own fancy, in order to display his art, so that, in truth, there are no scenes to be found there with any order, or representing the deeds of any distinguished person, either ancient or modern; and I, for my part, have never understood them, nor have I found, for all the inquiries that I have made, anyone who understands them, for in one place there is a woman, in another a man, in diverse attitudes, while one has the head of a lion near him, and another an angel in the guise of a Cupid, nor can one tell what it may all mean. There is, indeed, over the principal door, which opens into the Merceria, a woman seated who has at her feet the severed head of a giant, almost in the form of a Judith; she is raising the head with her sword, and speaking with a German, who is below her; but I have not been able to determine for what he intended her to stand, unless, indeed, he may have meant her to represent Germany. However, it may be seen that his figures are well grouped, and that he was ever making progress; and there are in it heads and parts of figures very well painted, and most vivacious in colouring. In all that he did there he aimed at being faithful to nature, without any imitation of another's manner; and the work is celebrated and famous in Venice, no less for what he painted therein than through its convenience for commerce and its utility to the commonwealth.

In 1504, a terrible fire broke out in Venice at the Fondaco de' Tedeschi by the Ponte del Rialto. The blaze destroyed the entire building and all the merchandise, causing great losses for the merchants. As a result, the Venetian government ordered it to be rebuilt, and it was quickly completed with more living spaces and greater elegance, decoration, and beauty. After Giorgione's fame grew, the responsible authorities decided he would paint the fresco, using colors of his choice, as long as he showcased his talent and created an outstanding work. This was to be in one of the most beautiful and prominent locations in the city. So, Giorgione started working on it, but focused solely on creating figures according to his imagination to display his artistic skill. Consequently, there are no coherent scenes depicting the actions of any notable figures, whether from history or modern times; honestly, I have never understood them, nor have I found anyone else who understands them, despite my inquiries. In one spot, there's a woman, in another, a man, in various poses; one has a lion's head nearby, and another has an angel resembling Cupid, leaving it unclear what it all means. Above the main door that leads into the Merceria, there is a seated woman with the severed head of a giant at her feet, almost like Judith; she is raising the head with her sword and speaking to a German figure below her. However, I can't figure out what he intended for her to represent—perhaps Germany itself. Nonetheless, it’s clear that his figures are well arranged, and he was continually making progress; there are beautifully painted heads and parts of figures with vibrant colors. In everything he created there, he aimed to stay true to nature without copying anyone else's style. This work is renowned and celebrated in Venice, not only for what he painted but also for its significance for trade and its benefit to the community.

He executed a picture of Christ bearing the Cross, with a Jew dragging him along, which in time was placed in the Church of S. Rocco, and which now, through the veneration that many feel for it, works miracles, as all may see. He worked in various places, such as Castelfranco, and throughout the territory of Treviso, and he made many portraits for Italian Princes; and many of his works were sent out of Italy, as things truly worthy to bear testimony that if Tuscany had a superabundance of craftsmen in every age, the region beyond, near the mountains, was not always abandoned and forgotten by Heaven.

He created a painting of Christ carrying the Cross, with a Jew pulling him along, which was eventually hung in the Church of S. Rocco, and now, due to the admiration many have for it, it performs miracles, as everyone can see. He worked in various locations, like Castelfranco and throughout the Treviso area, and he created many portraits for Italian princes; many of his works were sent out of Italy as true testaments that while Tuscany had an abundance of craftsmen in every era, the areas beyond, closer to the mountains, were not always neglected and overlooked by Heaven.

Portrait of a Young Man.

PORTRAIT OF A YOUNG MAN
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco.
Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 12A)
Bruckmann
View larger image

PORTRAIT OF A YOUNG MAN
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco.
Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 12A)
Bruckmann
View larger image

It is related that Giorgione, at the time when Andrea Verrocchio was making his bronze horse, fell into an argument with certain sculptors, who maintained, since sculpture showed various attitudes and aspects in one single figure to one walking round it, that for this reason it surpassed [Pg 113] painting, which only showed one side of a figure. Giorgione was of the opinion that there could be shown in a painted scene, without any necessity for walking round, at one single glance, all the various aspects that a man can present in many gestures—a thing which sculpture cannot do without a change of position and point of view, so that in her case the points of view are many, and not one. Moreover, he proposed to show in one single painted figure the front, the back, and the profile on either side, a challenge which brought them to their senses; and he did it in the following way. He painted a naked man with his back turned, at whose feet was a most limpid pool of water, wherein he painted the reflection of the man's front. At one side was a burnished cuirass that he had taken off, which showed his left profile, since everything could be seen on the polished surface of the piece of armour; and on the other side was a mirror, which reflected the other profile of the naked figure; which was a thing of most beautiful and bizarre fancy, whereby he sought to prove that painting does in fact, with more excellence, labour, and effect, achieve more at one single view of a living figure than does sculpture. And this work was greatly extolled and admired, as something ingenious and beautiful.

It's said that Giorgione, while Andrea Verrocchio was creating his bronze horse, got into a debate with some sculptors. They argued that since sculpture can display various poses and perspectives of a single figure as someone walks around it, it was superior to painting, which only presents one side of a figure. Giorgione believed that a painted scene could capture all the different aspects that a person can display in various poses without needing to move around it. This is something sculpture can't achieve without changing position and viewpoint, resulting in multiple perspectives for sculpture rather than just one. Additionally, he proposed to create a single painted figure that would show the front, back, and both sides, a challenge that challenged them. He accomplished this by painting a naked man with his back facing the viewer, beside a clear pool of water that reflected the man's front. On one side, he included a polished breastplate he had removed that displayed his left profile, visible in the shiny surface of the armor. On the other side was a mirror reflecting the other profile of the naked figure. This was a striking and imaginative approach, demonstrating that painting can achieve more at a single glance of a living figure than sculpture can. This work was greatly praised and admired for its ingenuity and beauty.

Judith.

JUDITH
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco.
S. Petersburg: Hermitage, 112)
M.S.
View larger image

JUDITH
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco.
S. Petersburg: Hermitage, 112)
M.S.
View larger image

He also made a portrait from life of Caterina, Queen of Cyprus, which I once saw in the hands of the illustrious Messer Giovanni Cornaro. There is in our book a head coloured in oils, the portrait of a German of the Fugger family, who was at that time one of the chief merchants in the Fondaco de' Tedeschi, which is an admirable work; together with other sketches and drawings made by him with the pen.

He also created a lifelike portrait of Caterina, Queen of Cyprus, which I once saw with the renowned Messer Giovanni Cornaro. In our book, there's an oil-painted head, the portrait of a German from the Fugger family, who was at the time one of the top merchants in the Fondaco de' Tedeschi—it's an impressive piece, along with other sketches and pen drawings he made.

While Giorgione was employed in doing honour both to himself and to his country, and frequenting many houses in order to entertain his various friends with his music, he became enamoured of a lady, and they took much joy, one with another, in their love. Now it happened that in the year 1511 she became infected with plague, without, however, knowing anything about it; and Giorgione, visiting her as usual, caught the plague in such a manner, that in a short time, at the age of thirty-four, he passed away to the other life, not without infinite grief on the part of his many friends, who loved him for his virtues, and great hurt [Pg 114] to the world, which thus lost him. However, they could bear up against this hurt and loss, in that he left behind him two excellent disciples in Sebastiano, the Venetian, who afterwards became Friar of the Piombo[12] at Rome, and Tiziano da Cadore, who not only equalled him, but surpassed him greatly; of both of whom we will speak at the proper time, describing fully the honour and benefit that they have conferred on art.

While Giorgione was busy bringing honor to himself and his country and visiting many homes to entertain his friends with his music, he fell in love with a lady, and they found great joy in each other's company. Unfortunately, in the year 1511, she contracted the plague without realizing it, and when Giorgione went to see her as usual, he caught the disease as well. Tragically, he passed away at the age of thirty-four, which caused overwhelming grief among his many friends, who cherished him for his virtues, and it was a significant loss to the world, which thus lost him. However, they managed to cope with this pain and loss, knowing he had left behind two outstanding disciples: Sebastiano, the Venetian, who later became a Friar of the Piombo in Rome, and Tiziano da Cadore, who not only matched him but greatly surpassed him; we will discuss both of them in due course, detailing the honor and contributions they made to art.

Caterina, Queen of Cyprus.

CATERINA, QUEEN OF CYPRUS
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco (?).
Milan: Crespi Collection)
Anderson
View larger image

CATERINA, QUEEN OF CYPRUS
(After the painting by Giorgione da Castelfranco (?).
Milan: Crespi Collection)
Anderson
View larger image


[Pg 115] ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO


[Pg 117] LIFE OF ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO

PAINTER

I do not wish to leave that country wherein our great mother Nature, in order not to be thought partial, gave to the world extraordinary men of that sort with which she had already for many and many a year adorned Tuscany; among whom was one endowed with an excellent and very beautiful genius, by name Antonio da Correggio, a most rare painter, who acquired the modern manner so perfectly, that in a few years, what with his natural gifts and his practice in art, he became a most excellent and marvellous craftsman. He was very timid by nature, and with great discomfort to himself he was continually labouring at the exercise of his art, for the sake of his family, which weighed upon him; and although it was a natural goodness that impelled him, nevertheless he afflicted himself more than was right in bearing the burden of those sufferings which are wont to crush mankind. He was very melancholy in his practice of art, a slave to her labours, and an unwearying investigator of all the difficulties of her realm; to which witness is borne by a vast multitude of figures in the Duomo of Parma, executed in fresco and well finished, which are to be found in the great tribune of the said church, and are seen foreshortened from below with an effect of marvellous grandeur.

I don’t want to leave the country where our great mother Nature, to avoid being seen as biased, has given the world extraordinary people like those she has long adorned Tuscany with. Among them was Antonio da Correggio, a gifted and beautiful genius, a truly rare painter. He mastered the modern style so perfectly that within a few years, thanks to his natural talents and dedication to his craft, he became an exceptional and amazing artist. Naturally timid, he struggled greatly as he worked on his art for the sake of his family, which weighed heavily on him. Although his innate kindness motivated him, he suffered more than necessary while bearing the burdens that often overwhelm humanity. He was quite melancholy in his artistic practice, a slave to her demands, and a tireless explorer of all the challenges in her domain. This is evidenced by a vast number of figures in the Duomo of Parma, created in fresco and finely finished, located in the grand apse of the church, where they can be seen foreshortened from below with a stunning sense of grandeur.

Antonio was the first who began to work in the modern manner in Lombardy; wherefore it is thought that if he, with his genius, had gone forth from Lombardy and lived in Rome, he would have wrought miracles, and would have brought the sweat to the brow of many who were held to be great men in his time. For, his works being such as they are without his having seen any of the ancient or the best of the modern, it [Pg 118] necessarily follows that, if he had seen them, he would have vastly improved his own, and, advancing from good to better, would have reached the highest rank. It may, at least, be held for certain that no one ever handled colours better than he, and that no craftsman ever painted with greater delicacy or with more relief, such was the softness of his flesh-painting, and such the grace with which he finished his works.

Antonio was the first to work in a modern style in Lombardy; therefore, it's believed that if he had taken his talent and moved to Rome, he would have created amazing works and made many so-called great artists of his time sweat. Given that his creations are what they are without having seen any of the classics or the best of the moderns, it [Pg 118] naturally follows that if he had experienced them, he would have significantly enhanced his own work and moved from good to better, ultimately achieving the highest level of mastery. It's safe to say that no one ever handled colors better than he did, and no other artist painted with greater delicacy or dimensionality; his flesh tones were so soft, and he finished his pieces with such grace.

Antiope.

ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO: ANTIOPE
(Paris: Louvre, 1118. Canvas)
View larger image

ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO: ANTIOPE
(Paris: Louvre, 1118. Canvas)
View larger image

In the same place, also, he painted two large pictures executed in oils, in one of which, among other figures, there may be seen a Dead Christ, which was highly extolled. And in S. Giovanni, in the same city, he painted a tribune in fresco, wherein he represented Our Lady ascending into Heaven amidst a multitude of angels, with other saints around; as to which, it seems impossible that he should have been able, I do not say to express it with his hand, but even to conceive it in his imagination, so beautiful are the curves of the draperies and the expressions that he gave to those figures. Of these there are some drawings in our book, done in red chalk by his hand, with some very beautiful borders of little boys, and other borders drawn in that work by way of ornament, with various fanciful scenes of sacrifices in the ancient manner. And in truth, if Antonio had not brought his works to that perfection which is seen in them, his drawings (although they show excellence of manner, and the charm and practised touch of a master) would not have gained for him among craftsmen the name that he has won with his wonderful paintings. This art is so difficult, and has so many branches, that very often a craftsman is not able to practise them all to perfection; for there have been many who have drawn divinely well, but have shown some imperfection in colouring, and others have been marvellous in colouring, but have not drawn half so well. All this depends on choice, and on the practice bestowed, in youth, in one case on drawing, in another on colour. But since all is learnt in order to carry works to the height of perfection, which is to put good colouring, together with draughtsmanship, into everything that is executed, for this reason Correggio deserves great praise, having attained to the height of perfection in the works that he coloured either in oils or in fresco; as he did in the Church of the Frati de' Zoccoli di S. Francesco, in the same city, [Pg 119] where he painted an Annunciation in fresco so well, that, when it became necessary to pull it down in making some changes in that building, those friars caused the wall round it to be bound with timber strengthened with iron, and, cutting it away little by little, they saved it; and it was built by them into a more secure place in the same convent.

In the same location, he also painted two large oil paintings, one of which features a Dead Christ among other figures, and it received high praise. In S. Giovanni, in the same city, he created a fresco in the tribune, depicting Our Lady ascending into Heaven surrounded by a host of angels, with other saints nearby; it's hard to believe he could have even imagined it, let alone painted it, given the beauty of the drapery and the expressions he captured in those figures. Some of his drawings done in red chalk are included in our book, featuring beautiful borders of cherubs and other decorative borders filled with various fanciful scenes of sacrifices in the ancient style. In truth, if Antonio hadn’t perfected his works to the level we see now, his drawings—though showcasing excellent technique and the charm of a skilled master—would not have earned him the distinguished reputation among craftsmen that he has achieved through his remarkable paintings. This art is incredibly challenging, with many facets, so often a craftsman may not master them all perfectly; there have been many who could draw divinely well but struggled with coloring, while others excelled in color but weren't as skilled in drawing. Ultimately, it comes down to the artist's focus and the practice they dedicate in their youth, whether that’s drawing or color. However, since all skills aim for the highest level of excellence, combining great coloring with drawing in every piece created, Correggio deserves immense praise for reaching that pinnacle in the works he colored, whether in oils or fresco; as demonstrated in the Church of the Frati de' Zoccoli di S. Francesco in the same city, [Pg 119] where he painted a fresco of the Annunciation so beautifully that, when renovations required its removal, the friars reinforced the wall around it with timber and iron, carefully cutting it away to preserve it, and they later reinstalled it in a more secure location within the same convent.

He painted, also, over one of the gates of that city, a Madonna who has the Child in her arms; and it is an astounding thing to see the lovely colouring of this work in fresco, through which he has won from passing strangers, who have seen nothing else of his, infinite praise and honour. For S. Antonio, likewise in that city, he painted a panel wherein is a Madonna, with S. Mary Magdalene; and near them is a boy in the guise of a little angel, holding a book in his hand, who is smiling, with a smile that seems so natural that he moves whoever beholds him to smile also, nor can any person, be his nature ever so melancholy, see him without being cheered. There is also a S. Jerome; and the whole work is coloured in a manner so wonderful and so astounding, that painters revere it for the marvel of its colouring, and it is scarcely possible to paint better.

He also painted a Madonna holding the Child in her arms over one of the gates of that city; the beautiful colors of this fresco are astonishing and have earned him endless praise and admiration from passersby who have seen nothing else of his work. For S. Antonio, also in that city, he created a panel featuring a Madonna with S. Mary Magdalene nearby. Alongside them is a boy dressed as a little angel, holding a book in his hand and smiling so naturally that anyone who sees him can't help but smile too. Even the most melancholic person can't gaze upon him without feeling uplifted. There's also a S. Jerome; the entire piece is colored in such a wonderful and astonishing way that fellow painters admire it for its stunning color, and it's almost impossible to paint better.

In like manner, he executed square pictures and other paintings for many lords throughout Lombardy; and, among other works, two pictures in Mantua for Duke Federigo II, to be sent to the Emperor, a gift truly worthy of such a Prince. Giulio Romano, seeing these works, said that he had never seen any colouring that attained to such perfection. One was a naked Leda, and the other a Venus; both so soft in colouring, with the shadows of the flesh so well wrought, that they appeared to be not colours, but flesh. In one there was a marvellous landscape, nor was there ever a Lombard who painted such things better than he; and, besides this, hair so lovely in colour, and executed in detail with such exquisite finish, that it is not possible to see anything better. There were also certain Loves, executed with beautiful art, who were making trial of their arrows, some of gold and some of lead, on a stone; and what lent most grace to the Venus was a clear and limpid stream, which ran among some stones and bathed her feet, but scarcely concealed any part of them, so that the sight of their delicate whiteness was a [Pg 120] moving thing for the eye to behold. For which reason Antonio most certainly deserved all praise and honour during his lifetime, and the greatest glory from the lips and pens of men after his death.

In the same way, he created square paintings and other artwork for many lords throughout Lombardy; among these, he completed two paintings in Mantua for Duke Federigo II, meant as a gift for the Emperor, truly worthy of such a Prince. Giulio Romano, upon seeing these works, remarked that he had never seen colors reach such perfection. One was a nude Leda, and the other a Venus; both were so soft in coloring, with the shadows of the flesh so well done, that they looked more like flesh than paint. One piece featured a stunning landscape, and there was never a Lombard who painted such scenes better than he did; in addition, the hair was so beautifully colored and detailed with such exquisite finish that nothing could be better. There were also several Cupids, rendered with beautiful artistry, testing their arrows, some made of gold and others of lead, on a stone; and what added the most grace to Venus was a clear, sparkling stream that flowed over some stones and brushed her feet, barely covering any part of them, making the sight of their delicate whiteness a [Pg 120] delightful thing for the eye to see. For this reason, Antonio truly deserved all praise and honor during his lifetime, and the greatest glory from the words and writings of men after his death.

In Modena, also, he painted a panel-picture of Our Lady, which is held in esteem by all painters, as the best picture in that city. In Bologna, likewise, in the house of the Ercolani, gentlemen of that city, there is a work by his hand, a Christ appearing to Mary Magdalene in the Garden, which is very beautiful. In Reggio there was a rare and most beautiful picture; and not long since, Messer Luciano Pallavigino, who takes much delight in noble paintings, passing through the city and seeing it, gave no thought to the cost, and, as if he had bought a jewel, sent it to his house in Genoa. At Reggio, likewise, is a panel containing a Nativity of Christ, wherein the splendour radiating from Him throws its light on the shepherds and all around on the figures that are contemplating Him; and among the many conceptions shown in that subject, there is a woman who, wishing to gaze intently at Christ, and not being able with her mortal sight to bear the light of His Divinity, which seems to be beating upon her with its rays, places a hand before her eyes; which is expressed so well that it is a marvel. Over the hut is a choir of angels singing, who are so well executed, that they appear rather to have rained down from Heaven than to have been made by the hand of a painter. And in the same city there is a little picture, a foot square, the rarest and most beautiful work that is to be seen by his hand, of Christ in the Garden, representing an effect of night, and painted with little figures; wherein the Angel, appearing to Christ, illumines Him with the splendour of his light, with such truth to nature, that nothing better can be imagined or expressed. Below, on a plain at the foot of the mountain, are seen the three Apostles sleeping, over whom the mountain on which Christ is praying casts a shadow, giving those figures a force which one is not able to describe. Far in the background, over a distant landscape, there is shown the appearing of the dawn; and on one side are seen coming some soldiers, with Judas. And although it is so small, this scene is so well conceived, that there is no work of the same kind to equal it either in patience or in study.

In Modena, he painted a panel of Our Lady that’s highly regarded by all artists as the best painting in the city. In Bologna, at the home of the Ercolani family, notable gentlemen of the city, there's another artwork by him—a depiction of Christ appearing to Mary Magdalene in the Garden, which is stunning. In Reggio, there was a rare and incredibly beautiful painting; recently, Messer Luciano Pallavigino, who has a strong passion for fine art, passed through the city, saw it, and didn’t think twice about the cost. He treated it like a precious jewel and sent it to his home in Genoa. Also in Reggio, there’s a panel depicting the Nativity of Christ, where the light radiating from Him illuminates the shepherds and the figures around Him; among the many interpretations in that scene, there's a woman who, wanting to gaze at Christ but unable to bear the overwhelming light of His Divinity, places a hand over her eyes—it's captured so well that it's truly remarkable. Above the hut, there's a choir of singing angels, portrayed so effectively that they seem to have descended from Heaven rather than being created by a painter’s hand. In the same city, there’s a small painting, just a foot square, which is perhaps the rarest and most beautiful work by him, showing Christ in the Garden at night, painted with tiny figures; here, the Angel appears to Christ, illuminating Him with the brilliance of His light, so true to nature that nothing better could be imagined or depicted. Below, at the foot of the mountain, the three Apostles are shown sleeping, with the mountain where Christ is praying casting a shadow over them, giving those figures an intensity that's hard to describe. In the background, over a distant landscape, the dawn is breaking, and on one side, soldiers are seen approaching with Judas. Although it's small, this scene is so well thought out that there’s no other work of its kind that matches it in detail or effort.

S. Thomas and S. James the Less.

S. THOMAS AND S. JAMES THE LESS
(Detail, after the fresco by Antonio da Correggio.
Parma: S. Giovanni Evangelista)
Anderson
View larger image

S. THOMAS AND S. JAMES THE LESS
(Detail, after the fresco by Antonio da Correggio.
Parma: S. Giovanni Evangelista)
Anderson
View larger image

[Pg 121] Many things might be said of the works of this master; but since, among the eminent men of our art, everything that is to be seen by his hand is admired as something divine, I will say no more. I have used all possible diligence in order to obtain his portrait, but, since he himself did not make it, and he was never portrayed by others, for he always lived in retirement, I have not been able to find one. He was, in truth, a person who had no opinion of himself, nor did he believe himself to be an able master of his art, contrasting his deficiencies with that perfection which he would have liked to achieve. He was contented with little, and he lived like an excellent Christian.

[Pg 121] A lot can be said about the works of this master; however, since everything created by his hand is regarded as something divine among the greats of our art, I won’t say more. I’ve done everything I could to get his portrait, but since he never created one himself and was never painted by anyone else—he always lived a secluded life—I haven’t been able to find any. He truly was someone who didn’t think much of himself and didn’t consider himself a skilled master of his art, always comparing his shortcomings to the perfection he aspired to achieve. He was satisfied with little and lived as a truly good Christian.

The Madonna and Child with S. Jerome.

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. JEROME
(After the painting by Antonio da Correggio.
Parma: Gallery, 351)
Anderson
View larger image

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. JEROME
(After the painting by Antonio da Correggio.
Parma: Gallery, 351)
Anderson
View larger image

Antonio, like a man who was weighed down by his family, was anxious to be always saving, and he had thereby become as miserly as he could well be. Wherefore it is related that, having received at Parma a payment of sixty crowns in copper coins, and wishing to take them to Correggio to meet some demand, he placed the money on his back and set out to walk on foot; but, being smitten by the heat of the sun, which was very great, and drinking water to refresh himself, he was seized by pleurisy, and had to take to his bed in a raging fever, nor did he ever raise his head from it, but finished the course of his life at the age of forty, or thereabout.

Antonio, like a man burdened by his family, was always anxious to save money, which made him as stingy as possible. It’s said that after receiving a payment of sixty crowns in copper coins in Parma, he wanted to take them to Correggio for some obligation. He put the money on his back and started walking. However, he was struck by the intense heat of the sun and, while trying to cool off with some water, he got pleurisy and had to go to bed with a high fever. He never got up again and passed away at around the age of forty.

His pictures date about 1512; and he bestowed a very great gift on painting by his handling of colours, which was that of a true master; and it was by means of him that men's eyes were opened in Lombardy, where so many beautiful intellects have been seen in painting, following him in making works worthy of praise and memory. Thus, by showing them his treatment of hair, executed with such facility, for all the difficulty of painting it, he taught them how it should be painted; for which all painters owe him an everlasting debt. At their instance the following epigram was written to him by Messer Fabio Segni, a gentleman of Florence:

His paintings date back to around 1512, and he made a significant contribution to art through his masterful use of color. It was through him that the people of Lombardy began to truly appreciate painting, inspiring many talented artists to create works that are still celebrated today. By demonstrating his technique for painting hair—done with such ease despite its complexity—he taught others how to approach this challenging aspect of art. For this, all painters owe him a lasting debt of gratitude. At their request, the following epigram was composed for him by Messer Fabio Segni, a gentleman from Florence:

Hujus cum regeret mortales spiritus artus
Pictoris, Charites supplicuere Jovi.
Non alia pingi dextra, Pater alme, rogamus;
Hunc præter, nulli pingere nos liceat.
[Pg 122] Annuit his votis summi regnator Olympi,
Et juvenem subito sidera ad alta tulit,
Ut posset melius Charitum simulacra referre
Præsens, et nudas cerneret inde Deas.

Him who governed the mortal spirits of the body
The Muses begged Jupiter.
No other hand, dear Father, do we ask to paint;
Aside from this one, let no one else paint us.
[Pg 122] The highest ruler of Olympus agreed to their requests,
And suddenly lifted the young man up to the bright stars,
So he could better capture the likeness of the Muses
In person, and check out the naked goddesses from that location.

At this same time lived Andrea del Gobbo of Milan, a very pleasing painter and colourist, many of whose works are scattered about in the houses of his native city of Milan. There is a large panel-picture of the Assumption of Our Lady, by his hand, in the Certosa of Pavia, but it was left unfinished, on account of death overtaking him; which panel shows how excellent he was, and how great a lover of the labours of art.

At this time, Andrea del Gobbo from Milan lived. He was a very talented painter and colorist, and many of his works can be found in homes throughout his hometown of Milan. There is a large panel painting of the Assumption of Our Lady by him in the Certosa of Pavia, but it was left unfinished due to his untimely death. This panel demonstrates his excellence and deep passion for the art.

The Adoration of the Magi.

ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO: THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(Milan: Brera, 427. Canvas)
View larger image

ANTONIO DA CORREGGIO: THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(Milan: Brera, 427. Canvas)
View larger image


[Pg 123] PIERO DI COSIMO


[Pg 125] LIFE OF PIERO DI COSIMO

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

While Giorgione and Correggio, to their own great credit and glory, were honouring the regions of Lombardy, Tuscany, on her part, was not wanting in men of beautiful intellect; among whom, not one of the least was Piero, the son of one Lorenzo, a goldsmith, and a pupil of Cosimo Rosselli, after whom he was always called Piero di Cosimo, and known by no other name. And in truth, when a man teaches us excellence and gives us the secret of living rightly, he deserves no less gratitude from us, and should be held no less as a true father, than he who begets us and gives us life and nothing more.

While Giorgione and Correggio were making their mark in Lombardy, Tuscany had its own share of brilliant minds. Among them was Piero, the son of Lorenzo, a goldsmith, and a student of Cosimo Rosselli, which is why he was always called Piero di Cosimo and known only by that name. And indeed, when someone teaches us excellence and reveals the secrets to living well, they deserve just as much gratitude from us and should be regarded as a true father, just like the one who gives us life and nothing more.

Piero was entrusted by his father, who saw in his son a lively intelligence and an inclination to the art of design, to the care of Cosimo, who took him with no ordinary willingness; and seeing him grow no less in ability than in years, among the many disciples that he had, he bore him love as to a son, and always held him as such. This young man had by nature a most lofty spirit, and he was very strange, and different in fancy from the other youths who were working with Cosimo in order to learn the same art. He was at times so intent on what he was doing, that when some subject was being discussed, as often happens, at the end of the discussion it was necessary to go back to the beginning and tell him the whole, so far had his brain wandered after some other fancy of his own. And he was likewise so great a lover of solitude, that he knew no pleasure save that of going off by himself with his thoughts, letting his fancy roam and building his castles in the air. Right good reason had Cosimo, his master, for wishing him well, seeing that he made so much use of him in his works, that very often he caused him to execute [Pg 126] things of great importance, knowing that Piero had a more beautiful manner, as well as better judgment, than himself. For this reason he took Piero with him to Rome, when he was summoned thither by Pope Sixtus in order to paint the scenes in his chapel; in one of which Piero executed a very beautiful landscape, as was related in the Life of Cosimo.

Piero was given into the care of Cosimo by his father, who recognized his son's keen intelligence and talent for design. Cosimo welcomed him wholeheartedly and as he watched Piero grow in skill along with his age, he loved him like a son, always treating him as such. This young man had an exceptionally high spirit, making him quite unique and different in imagination from the other young artists working with Cosimo to learn the same craft. He could become so absorbed in his work that when a topic was being discussed, he often drifted so far off mentally that they needed to start over at the beginning of the conversation to bring him back. He also loved solitude so much that his only pleasure came from spending time alone with his thoughts, letting his imagination wander and dreaming up ideas. Cosimo had good reason to care for him, as he utilized Piero in many of his projects, often assigning him very important tasks, knowing that Piero had a more refined style and better judgment than himself. For this reason, he took Piero with him to Rome when he was called there by Pope Sixtus to paint the scenes in his chapel; in one of these, Piero created a beautiful landscape, as mentioned in the Life of Cosimo.

And since Piero drew most excellently from the life, he made in Rome many portraits of distinguished persons; in particular, those of Virginio Orsino and Ruberto Sanseverino, which he placed in the aforesaid scenes. Afterwards, also, he made a portrait of Duke Valentino, the son of Pope Alexander VI; which painting, to my knowledge, is not now to be found; but the cartoon by his hand still exists, being in the possession of the reverend and cultured M. Cosimo Bartoli, Provost of S. Giovanni. In Florence, he painted many pictures for a number of citizens, which are dispersed among their various houses, and of such I have seen some that are very good; and so, also, various things for many other persons. In the Noviciate of S. Marco is a picture by his hand of Our Lady, standing, with the Child in her arms, coloured in oils. And for the Chapel of Gino Capponi, in the Church of S. Spirito at Florence, he painted a panel wherein is the Visitation of Our Lady, with S. Nicholas, and a S. Anthony who is reading with a pair of spectacles on his nose, a very spirited figure. Here he counterfeited a book bound in parchment, somewhat old, which seems to be real, and also some balls that he gave to the S. Nicholas, shining and casting gleams of light and reflections from one to another; from which even by that time men could perceive the strangeness of his brain, and his constant seeking after difficulties.

And since Piero was an excellent painter who worked from life, he created many portraits of notable figures in Rome, especially those of Virginio Orsino and Ruberto Sanseverino, which he included in the previously mentioned works. Later, he also painted a portrait of Duke Valentino, the son of Pope Alexander VI; that painting, as far as I know, can no longer be found, but the cartoon he made still exists and is owned by the well-respected and knowledgeable M. Cosimo Bartoli, Provost of S. Giovanni. In Florence, he painted many artworks for various citizens, which are scattered among their homes, and I have seen some that are quite impressive; he created various other pieces for many different people as well. In the Noviciate of S. Marco, there is a painting by him of Our Lady standing with the Child in her arms, done in oils. For the Chapel of Gino Capponi in the Church of S. Spirito in Florence, he painted a panel featuring the Visitation of Our Lady, with S. Nicholas and S. Anthony, who is reading with glasses on his nose, making for a very lively figure. Here, he depicted a somewhat old book bound in parchment that looks real, along with some balls given to S. Nicholas, which shine and reflect light off one another; from this, even at that time, people could notice the uniqueness of his mind and his constant pursuit of challenges.

The Death of Procris.

PIERO DI COSIMO: THE DEATH OF PROCRIS
(London: National Gallery, 698. Panel)
View larger image

PIERO DI COSIMO: THE DEATH OF PROCRIS
(London: National Gallery, 698. Panel)
View larger image

Even better did he show this after the death of Cosimo, when he kept himself constantly shut up, and would not let himself be seen at work, leading the life of a man who was less man than beast. He would never have his rooms swept, he would only eat when hunger came to him, and he would not let his garden be worked or his fruit-trees pruned; nay, he allowed his vines to grow, and the shoots to trail over the ground, nor were his fig-trees ever trimmed, or any other trees, for it pleased him to see everything wild, like his own nature; and he declared that Nature's own things should be left to her to look after, without lifting a hand to [Pg 127] them. He set himself often to observe such animals, plants, or other things as Nature at times creates out of caprice, or by chance; in which he found a pleasure and satisfaction that drove him quite out of his mind with delight; and he spoke of them so often in his discourse, that at times, although he found pleasure in them, it became wearisome to others. He would sometimes stop to gaze at a wall against which sick people had been for a long time discharging their spittle, and from this he would picture to himself battles of horsemen, and the most fantastic cities and widest landscapes that were ever seen; and he did the same with the clouds in the sky.

He really showed this after Cosimo died when he kept himself locked away and wouldn’t let anyone see him working, living like someone who was more beast than human. He never had his rooms cleaned, only ate when he felt hungry, and wouldn’t allow anyone to tend his garden or trim his fruit trees; in fact, he let his vines grow wild with shoots trailing on the ground, and his fig trees and other trees were never pruned because he liked to see everything untamed, just like his own nature. He believed that Nature’s creations should be left alone to take care of themselves without any interference. He often took time to observe animals, plants, or other things that Nature creates randomly or whimsically; in those moments, he found such joy that it would almost drive him mad with delight. He talked about them so much that, while he enjoyed them, it sometimes became tiresome for others. He would occasionally stop to stare at a wall where sick people had been spitting for a long time, and from that, he would imagine battles of horsemen and the most bizarre cities and vast landscapes ever seen; he did the same thing with the clouds in the sky.

He gave his attention to colouring in oils, having seen some works of Leonardo's, executed with that gradation of colour, and finished with that extraordinary diligence, which Leonardo used to employ when he wished to display his art. And so Piero, being pleased with his method, sought to imitate it, although he was afterwards very distant from Leonardo, and worlds away from any other manner. It may be said, in truth, that he changed his manner almost for every work that he executed.

He focused on painting with oils after seeing some works by Leonardo, which had that smooth transition of colors and were finished with an incredible attention to detail that Leonardo was known for when he wanted to showcase his art. Because Piero admired this technique, he tried to replicate it, even though he eventually strayed far from Leonardo’s style and completely away from any other approach. It’s true that he almost changed his style with every piece he created.

If Piero had not been so solitary, and had taken more care of himself in his way of living than he did, he would have made known the greatness of his intellect in such a way that he would have been revered, whereas, by reason of his uncouth ways, he was rather held to be a madman, although in the end he did no harm save to himself alone, while his works were beneficial and useful to his art. For which reason every good intellect and every excellent craftsman should always be taught, from such an example, to keep his eyes on the end of life.

If Piero hadn't been so withdrawn and had taken better care of himself in how he lived, he would have shown off the greatness of his intellect in a way that earned him admiration. Instead, due to his awkward behavior, people saw him more as a madman. In the end, he harmed no one but himself, while his works were valuable and useful to his craft. For this reason, every intelligent person and skilled craftsman should learn from this example to focus on the end goal of life.

Nor will I refrain from saying that Piero, in his youth, being fanciful and extravagant in invention, was much employed for the masquerades that are held during the Carnival; and he became very dear to the young noblemen of Florence, having improved their festivals much in invention, adornment, grandeur, and pomp. As to that kind of pastime, it is said that he was one of the first to contrive to marshal them in the form of triumphal processions; at least, he improved them greatly, by accompanying the invention of the story represented, not only with music and with words suited to the subject, but also with a train of incredible [Pg 128] pomp, formed of men on foot and on horseback, with habits and ornaments in keeping with the story; which produced a very rich and beautiful effect, and had in it something both grand and ingenious. And it was certainly a very beautiful thing to see, by night, twenty-five or thirty pairs of horses, most richly caparisoned, with their riders in costume, according to the subject of the invention, and six or eight grooms to each rider, with torches in their hands, and all clothed in one and the same livery, sometimes more than four hundred in number; and then the chariot, or triumphal car, covered with ornaments, trophies, and most bizarre things of fancy; altogether, a thing which makes men's intellects more subtle, and gives great pleasure and satisfaction to the people.

I won’t hold back from saying that Piero, in his youth, was imaginative and extravagant with his ideas, and he was frequently called upon for the masquerades during Carnival. He became very popular among the young noblemen of Florence, enhancing their celebrations with his creativity, decorations, grandeur, and flair. It’s said that he was one of the first to organize these events in the style of triumphal processions; at the very least, he greatly improved them by pairing the story being depicted not just with fitting music and words, but also with an impressive display of people on foot and horseback, dressed and adorned to match the theme. This created a rich and beautiful effect, blending something grand with ingenuity. It was truly magnificent to see, at night, twenty-five or thirty pairs of horses, all lavishly adorned, with their riders in costumes reflecting the theme, and six or eight grooms for each rider holding torches and all wearing matching attire, sometimes totaling over four hundred people. Then there was the chariot or triumphal car, covered in decorations, trophies, and wonderfully imaginative details; altogether, it made for an experience that sharpened minds and brought great joy and satisfaction to the crowd.

Perseus delivering Andromeda.

PERSEUS DELIVERING ANDROMEDA
(After the panel by Piero di Cosimo.
Florence: Uffizi, 1312)
Brogi
View larger image

PERSEUS SAVING ANDROMEDA
(Inspired by the artwork of Piero di Cosimo.
Florence: Uffizi, 1312)
Brogi
View larger image

Among these spectacles, which were numerous and ingenious, it is my pleasure to give a brief description of one, which was contrived mostly by Piero, when he was already of a mature age, and which was not, like many, pleasing through its beauty, but, on the contrary, on account of a strange, horrible, and unexpected invention, gave no little satisfaction to the people: for even as in the matter of food bitter things sometimes give marvellous delight to the human palate, so do horrible things in such pastimes, if only they be carried out with judgment and art; which is evident in the representation of tragedies. This was the Car of Death, wrought by him with the greatest secrecy in the Sala del Papa, so that nothing could ever be found out about it, until it was seen and known at one and the same moment. This triumphal chariot was an enormous car drawn by buffaloes, black all over and painted with skeletons and white crosses; and upon the highest point of the car stood a colossal figure of Death, scythe in hand, and right round the car were a number of covered tombs; and at all the places where the procession halted for the chanting of dirges, these tombs opened, and from them issued figures draped in black cloth, upon which were painted all the bones of a skeleton, over their arms, breasts, flanks, and legs; which, what with the white over the black, and the appearing in the distance of some figures carrying torches, with masks that represented a death's head both in front and behind, as well as the neck, not only gave an appearance of the greatest reality, but was also horrible and terrifying [Pg 129] to behold. And these figures of the dead, at the sound of certain muffled trumpets, low and mournful in tone, came half out of their tombs, and, seating themselves upon them, sang to music full of melancholy that song so celebrated at the present day: "Dolor, pianto, e penitenzia." Before and after the car came a great number of the dead, riding on certain horses picked out with the greatest diligence from among the leanest and most meagre that could be found, with black caparisons covered with white crosses; and each had four grooms draped in the garb of death, with black torches, and a large black standard with crosses, bones, and death's heads. After the car were trailed ten black standards; and as they walked, the whole company sang in unison, with trembling voices, that Psalm of David that is called the Miserere.

Among these numerous and clever displays, I’m excited to describe one, mostly created by Piero, who was already quite experienced. Unlike many others, this one wasn't appealing for its beauty; instead, it captivated the crowd with a bizarre, frightening, and unexpected twist. Just as bitter flavors can sometimes delight our taste buds, horrifying elements in entertainment can invoke fascination if executed thoughtfully and artistically, as is evident in tragic performances. This was the Car of Death, crafted by him in utmost secrecy in the Sala del Papa, so that no one knew anything about it until it was revealed. This grand chariot was a massive vehicle pulled by buffaloes, completely black and adorned with skeletons and white crosses. At the top of the chariot stood a giant figure of Death holding a scythe, surrounded by several covered tombs. Whenever the procession paused for mourning songs, these tombs opened, and figures draped in black cloth emerged, with painted skeleton bones across their arms, chests, sides, and legs. The contrast of white on black, along with figures in the distance holding torches and wearing masks depicting skulls from both the front and back, created an incredibly realistic yet terrifying sight. At the sound of muted trumpets, low and sorrowful, these figures would rise partially from their tombs, sit upon them, and sing a mournful song that is well-known today: “Dolor, pianto, e penitenzia.” A large group of the dead followed the chariot, riding horses that had been carefully chosen from the leanest available, dressed in black coverings adorned with white crosses. Each rider was accompanied by four attendants in death attire, carrying black torches and a large black banner featuring crosses, bones, and skulls. Behind the chariot, ten black banners trailed along, and the entire group sang in harmony, with trembling voices, the Psalm of David known as the Miserere. [Pg 129]

This dread spectacle, through its novelty and terror, as I have said, filled the whole city with fear and marvel together; and although at the first sight it did not seem suited to a Carnival, nevertheless, being new and very well arranged, it pleased the minds of all, and Piero, the creator and inventor of the whole, gained consummate praise and commendation for it; and it was the reason that afterwards, going from one thing to another, men continued to contrive lively and ingenious inventions, so that in truth, for such representations and for holding similar festivals, this city has never had an equal. And in those old men who saw it there still remains a vivid memory of it, nor are they ever weary of celebrating this fantastic invention. I have heard from the lips of Andrea di Cosimo, who helped him to carry out the work, and of Andrea del Sarto, who was Piero's disciple, and who also had a hand in it, that it was a common opinion at that time that this invention was intended to foreshadow the return of the Medici family to Florence in the year 1512, since at the time when the procession was held they were exiles, and, so to speak, dead, but destined in a short time to come to life; and in this sense were interpreted the following words in the song—

This shocking display, with its combination of novelty and fear, as I mentioned, filled the entire city with both dread and wonder; and although it didn't initially seem appropriate for a Carnival, its freshness and excellent execution captivated everyone. Piero, the mastermind behind it all, received immense praise and recognition for his work; this inspired others to create lively and clever inventions, making our city truly unmatched for such performances and festivities. Among the older men who witnessed it, there remains a strong memory of that event, and they never tire of celebrating this imaginative creation. I've heard from Andrea di Cosimo, who assisted Piero in bringing it to life, and Andrea del Sarto, Piero's apprentice who also contributed, that it was commonly believed at that time that this invention hinted at the Medici family's return to Florence in 1512, since they were exiled and essentially out of sight at the time of the procession but were about to rise again; and this interpretation can be seen in the following lines of the song—

Morti siam come vedete,
Così morti vedrem voi;
Fummo già come voi siete,
Voi sarete come noi, etc.

Morti siamo come vedete,
Così morti vedrete voi;
Fummo già come voi siete,
Voi sarete come noi, etc.

[Pg 130] whereby men wished to signify the return of that family (a resurrection, as it were, from death to life), and the expulsion and abasement of their enemies; or it may have been that many gave it that significance from the subsequent fact of the return of that illustrious house to Florence—so prone is the human intellect to applying every word and act that has come previously, to the events that happen afterwards. Certain it is that this was the opinion of many at that time; and it was much spoken of.

[Pg 130] where men wanted to express the return of that family (a kind of revival from death to life), along with the defeat and humiliation of their enemies; or perhaps many attributed that meaning to it because of the later return of that notable house to Florence—human nature is so quick to connect past words and actions with subsequent events. It’s clear that this was the view of many at that time, and it was widely discussed.

Venus, Mars, and Cupid.

VENUS, MARS, AND CUPID
(After the panel by Piero di Cosimo.
Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 107)
Hanfstaengl
View larger image

VENUS, MARS, AND CUPID
(After the panel by Piero di Cosimo.
Berlin: Kaiser Friedrich Museum, 107)
Hanfstaengl
View larger image

But to return to the art and actions of Piero; he was given the commission for a panel in the Church of the Servite Friars, in the Chapel of the Tedaldi, where they keep the garment and the pillow of S. Filippo, a brother of their Order; wherein he depicted Our Lady standing, raised from the ground on a pedestal, and uplifting her head towards Heaven, with a book in her hand, but without her Son; and above her is the Holy Spirit, bathing her with light. Nor did he wish that any other light than that of the Dove should illumine her and the figures that are round her, such as a S. Margaret and a S. Catherine, who are on their knees, adoring her, while S. Peter and S. John the Evangelist are standing, contemplating her, together with S. Filippo, the Servite Friar, and S. Antonino, Archbishop of Florence. Moreover, he made there a landscape that is very bizarre, what with the strange trees and certain grottoes. And in truth, there are some very beautiful things in this work, such as certain heads that reveal both draughtsmanship and grace; besides the colouring, which is very harmonious, for it is certain that Piero was a great master of colouring in oils. In the predella he painted some little scenes, very well executed; and, among others, there is one of S. Margaret issuing from the belly of the Dragon, wherein he made that animal so monstrous and hideous, that I do not think that there is anything better of that kind to be seen, for with its eyes it reveals venom, fire, and death, in an aspect truly terrifying. And certainly, as for such things, I do not believe that any one ever did them better than he, or came near him in imagining them; to which witness is borne by a marine monster that he made and presented to the Magnificent Giuliano de' Medici, which is so extravagant, bizarre, and fantastic in its deformity, that it seems [Pg 131] impossible that Nature should produce anything so deformed and strange among her creations. This monster is now in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo de' Medici, as is also a book, likewise by the hand of Piero, of animals of the same kind, most beautiful and bizarre, hatched very diligently with the pen, and finished with an incredible patience; which book was presented to him by M. Cosimo Bartoli, Provost of S. Giovanni, who is very much my friend, as he is of all our craftsmen, being a man who has always delighted, and still delights, in our profession.

But getting back to Piero's art and actions; he was commissioned to create a panel for the Church of the Servite Friars, in the Chapel of the Tedaldi, where they keep the garment and pillow of St. Filippo, a brother of their Order. In this piece, he depicted Our Lady standing on a pedestal, looking up towards Heaven, holding a book, but without her Son. Above her is the Holy Spirit, shining light on her. He chose to use only the light of the Dove to illuminate her and the figures around her, like St. Margaret and St. Catherine, who are kneeling in adoration, while St. Peter and St. John the Evangelist stand by, gazing at her, along with St. Filippo, the Servite Friar, and St. Antonino, Archbishop of Florence. He also created a landscape that is quite unusual, filled with strange trees and some grottoes. There are truly beautiful aspects in this work, such as certain heads that show both skill and elegance; plus, the colors are very harmonious, proving that Piero was a master of oil coloring. In the predella, he painted some small scenes, very well done; among them is a depiction of St. Margaret emerging from the belly of the Dragon, where he made the creature so monstrous and grotesque that I believe there's nothing like it to be found; its eyes reveal venom, fire, and death, creating a truly terrifying sight. Indeed, I don't think anyone has ever done such things better than he, or even come close to his imagination; this is supported by a marine monster he created and presented to the Magnificent Giuliano de' Medici, which is so extravagant, bizarre, and fantastical in its deformity that it seems impossible for Nature to produce anything so grotesque and strange among her creations. This monster is now in Duke Cosimo de' Medici's guardaroba, along with a book, also by Piero, containing beautifully bizarre animals, meticulously drawn with incredible patience; this book was given to him by M. Cosimo Bartoli, Provost of S. Giovanni, who is a dear friend of mine and of all our craftsmen, being a man who has always enjoyed, and still enjoys, our profession.

He also executed, round a chamber in the house of Francesco del Pugliese, various scenes with little figures; nor is it possible to describe the different fantastic things that he delighted to paint in all those scenes, what with the buildings, the animals, the costumes, the various instruments, and any other fanciful things that came into his head, since the stories were drawn from fables. These scenes, after the death of Francesco del Pugliese and his sons, were taken away, nor do I know what has become of them; and the same thing has happened to a picture of Mars and Venus, with her Loves and Vulcan, executed with great art and with an incredible patience.

He also created various scenes with small figures around a room in Francesco del Pugliese's house; it's impossible to describe all the different imaginative things he enjoyed painting in those scenes, including the buildings, animals, costumes, various instruments, and any other whimsical ideas he came up with, as the stories were inspired by fables. After Francesco del Pugliese and his sons passed away, these scenes were taken away, and I don’t know what happened to them; the same thing occurred with a painting of Mars and Venus, along with her Loves and Vulcan, which was done with great skill and incredible patience.

Piero painted, for the elder Filippo Strozzi, a picture with little figures of Perseus delivering Andromeda from the Monster, in which are some very beautiful things. It is now in the house of Signor Sforza Almeni, First Chamberlain to Duke Cosimo, having been presented to him by Messer Giovanni Battista, the son of Lorenzo Strozzi, who knew how much that nobleman delighted in painting and sculpture; and he holds it in great account, for Piero never made a more lovely or more highly finished picture than this one, seeing that it is not possible to find a more bizarre or more fantastic sea-monster than that which Piero imagined and painted, or a fiercer attitude than that of Perseus, who is raising his sword in the air to smite the beast. In it, trembling between fear and hope, Andromeda is seen bound, most beautiful in countenance; and in the foreground are many people in various strange costumes, playing instruments and singing; among whom are some heads, smiling and rejoicing at seeing the deliverance of Andromeda, that are divine. The landscape is very beautiful, and the colouring sweet and full of [Pg 132] grace. In short, with regard to the harmony and gradation of the colours, he executed this work with the greatest possible diligence.

Piero painted, for the elder Filippo Strozzi, a picture featuring small figures of Perseus rescuing Andromeda from the Monster, which contains some truly beautiful elements. It is currently in the home of Signor Sforza Almeni, the First Chamberlain to Duke Cosimo, having been given to him by Messer Giovanni Battista, the son of Lorenzo Strozzi, who understood how much that nobleman appreciated painting and sculpture; and he values it highly, since Piero never created a more beautiful or more finely finished artwork than this one. It’s impossible to find a more striking or fantastical sea monster than the one Piero imagined and painted, or a fiercer pose than that of Perseus, who is raising his sword high to strike the beast. In it, caught between fear and hope, Andromeda is shown bound, incredibly beautiful in appearance; and in the foreground are many people in various unusual costumes, playing instruments and singing; among them are some heads, smiling and rejoicing at the sight of Andromeda’s rescue, that are divine. The landscape is very beautiful, and the colors are soft and full of [Pg 132] grace. In short, regarding the harmony and gradation of the colors, he executed this work with the utmost care.

He painted, also, a picture containing a nude Venus, with a Mars, likewise nude, who is sleeping in a meadow full of flowers, and all around are various Loves, who are carrying away, some here, some there, the helmet, armlets, and other pieces of armour of Mars; there is a grove of myrtle, with a Cupid that is afraid of a rabbit, and there are also the Doves of Venus and the other emblems of Love. This picture is at Florence, in the house of Giorgio Vasari, who keeps it in memory of that master, whose caprices have always pleased him.

He also painted a picture featuring a nude Venus and a nude Mars, who is sleeping in a meadow full of flowers. All around them are various Cupids, some taking away Mars's helmet, armlets, and other pieces of armor. There's a grove of myrtle with a Cupid that's afraid of a rabbit, and you can also see Venus's doves and other symbols of love. This painting is in Florence, at the house of Giorgio Vasari, who keeps it to remember that master, whose playful style has always delighted him.

The Director of the Hospital of the Innocenti was much the friend of Piero; and wishing to have a panel painted, which was to be placed in the Pugliese Chapel, near the entrance into the church, on the left hand, he gave the commission for it to Piero, who brought it to completion at his leisure; but first he reduced his patron to despair, for on no account would he let him see it until it was finished. How strange this seemed to the patron, both because of their friendship, and because of his supplying Piero continually with money, without seeing what was being done, he himself showed, when, on the occasion of the final payment, he refused to give it to him without seeing the work. But, on Piero threatening that he would destroy all that he had painted, he was forced to give him the rest, and to wait patiently, in a greater rage than ever, for it to be set in place. This picture contains much that is truly beautiful.

The Director of the Hospital of the Innocenti was a close friend of Piero. Wanting to have a panel painted for the Pugliese Chapel, located near the entrance of the church on the left side, he commissioned Piero to do it. Piero took his time completing it, but first, he drove his patron to despair, refusing to show him the work until it was finished. This behavior seemed bizarre to the patron, not only because of their friendship but also because he was always providing Piero with money without seeing any progress. When it came time for the final payment, he insisted on seeing the painting first. However, when Piero threatened to destroy everything he had painted, the patron reluctantly paid him the rest and had to wait in even greater frustration for it to be installed. This painting features many truly beautiful elements.

He undertook to paint a panel for a chapel in the Church of S. Piero Gattolini, and in this he represented Our Lady seated, with four figures round her, and two angels in the sky, who are crowning her; which work, executed with such diligence that it brought him praise and honour, is now to be seen in S. Friano, the other church having been ruined. For the tramezzo[13] of the Church of S. Francesco, at Fiesole, he painted a little panel-picture of the Conception, which is a passing good little work, the figures being of no great size. For Giovanni Vespucci, who lived in a house now belonging to Piero Salviati, opposite to S. Michele, in the Via de' Servi, he executed some bacchanalian scenes, which are [Pg 133] round an apartment; wherein he made such strange fauns, satyrs, sylvan gods, little boys, and bacchanals, that it is a marvel to see the diversity of the bay horses and garments, and the variety of the goatlike features, and all with great grace and most vivid truth to nature. In one scene is Silenus riding on an ass, with many children, some supporting him, and some giving him drink; and throughout the whole is a feeling of the joy of life, produced by the great genius of Piero. And in truth, in all that there is to be seen by his hand, one recognizes a spirit very different and far distant from that of other painters, and a certain subtlety in the investigation of some of the deepest and most subtle secrets of Nature, without grudging time or labour, but only for his own delight and for his pleasure in the art. And it could not well be otherwise; since, having grown enamoured of her, he cared nothing for his own comfort, and reduced himself to eating nothing but boiled eggs, which, in order to save firing, he cooked when he was boiling his glue, and not six or eight at a time, but in fifties; and, keeping them in a basket, he would eat them one by one. In this life he found such peculiar pleasure that any other, in comparison with his own, seemed to him slavery. He could not bear the crying of children, the coughing of men, the sound of bells, and the chanting of friars; and when the rain was pouring in torrents from the sky, it pleased him to see it streaming straight down from the roofs and splashing on the ground. He had the greatest terror of lightning; and, when he heard very loud thunder, he wrapped himself in his mantle, and, having closed the windows and the door of the room, he crouched in a corner until the storm should pass. He was very varied and original in his discourse, and sometimes said such beautiful things, that he made his hearers burst with laughter. But when he was old, and near the age of eighty, he had become so strange and eccentric that nothing could be done with him. He would not have assistants standing round him, so that his misanthropy had robbed him of all possible aid. He was sometimes seized by a desire to work, but was not able, by reason of the palsy, and fell into such a rage that he tried to force his hands to labour; but, as he muttered to himself, the mahlstick fell from his grasp, and even his brushes, so that it was pitiable to behold. Flies enraged [Pg 134] him, and even shadows annoyed him. And so, having become ill through old age, he was visited by one or two friends, who besought him to make his peace with God; but he would not believe that he was dying, and put them off from one day to another; not that he was hard of heart, or an unbeliever, for he was a most zealous Christian, although his life was that of a beast. He discoursed at times on the torments of those ills that destroy men's bodies, and of the suffering endured by those who come to die with their strength wasting away little by little, which he called a great affliction. He spoke evil of physicians, apothecaries, and those who nurse the sick, saying that they cause them to die of hunger; besides the tortures of syrups, medicines, clysters, and other martyrdoms, such as not being allowed to sleep when you are drowsy, making your will, seeing your relatives round you, and staying in a dark room. He praised death by the hand of justice, saying that it was a fine thing to go to your death in that way; to see the broad sky about you, and all that throng; to be comforted with sweetmeats and with kind words; to have the priest and the people praying for you; and to go into Paradise with the Angels; so that whoever departed from this life at one blow, was very fortunate. And as he discoursed, he would twist everything to the strangest meanings that were ever heard. Wherefore, living in such strange fashion, he reduced himself to such a state with his extravagant fancies, that one morning he was found dead at the foot of a staircase, in the year 1521; and he was given burial in S. Piero Maggiore.

He took on the task of painting a panel for a chapel in the Church of S. Piero Gattolini, where he depicted Our Lady seated, surrounded by four figures, with two angels in the sky crowning her. This work, executed with such care that it earned him praise and honor, can now be seen in S. Friano, as the other church was ruined. For the tramezzo[13] of the Church of S. Francesco at Fiesole, he painted a small panel picture of the Conception, which is quite a fine piece, featuring figures that are not very large. For Giovanni Vespucci, who lived in a house now owned by Piero Salviati, across from S. Michele on Via de' Servi, he created some bacchanalian scenes that decorate an apartment; in these, he portrayed such bizarre fauns, satyrs, woodland gods, children, and bacchanals that it's impressive to see the variety of bay horses, clothing, and goatlike features—all rendered with great elegance and vibrant realism. One scene shows Silenus riding an ass, flanked by many children, some helping him and others giving him drink; throughout the whole work, there's a sense of the joy of life, born from Piero's immense talent. Indeed, in everything visible from his hand, one can recognize a spirit that is very different and distant from other painters, and a certain skill in exploring some of Nature's deepest secrets, dedicating time and effort not begrudgingly, but purely for his own enjoyment and love for the art. It couldn’t have been any other way; enamored by art, he didn’t care for his own comfort and survived on nothing but boiled eggs, which he cooked in batches of fifty—when boiling glue to save fuel—and would eat them one by one from a basket. He found such unique pleasure in this lifestyle that everything else, in comparison, felt like slavery. He couldn’t stand the cries of children, the coughs of men, the sound of bells, or the chanting of friars; and when heavy rain poured from the sky, he delighted in watching it stream down the roofs and splash on the ground. He was terrified of lightning, and when loud thunder boomed, he would wrap himself in his cloak, close the room's windows and door, and huddle in a corner until the storm passed. He was diverse and original in his conversations and sometimes said such beautiful things that his listeners would burst into laughter. However, when he grew old, nearing eighty, he became so peculiar and eccentric that he became impossible to manage. He wouldn't allow assistants to be around him, so his misanthropy deprived him of any help. Sometimes he felt an urge to work but was unable due to paralysis, leading him into such a rage that he tried to force his hands to work; but as he muttered to himself, his mahlstick would fall from his grasp, along with his brushes, making it a sad sight. Flies irritated him, and even shadows bothered him. As he aged and fell ill, a couple of friends visited, urging him to reconcile with God; however, he didn’t believe he was dying and kept putting them off day after day—not out of hardness of heart or disbelief, for he was a very devout Christian, despite living a life akin to that of an animal. At times, he spoke about the pains of diseases that destroy the body, and the suffering of those who slowly waste away at death, which he called a great affliction. He spoke poorly of doctors, pharmacists, and nurses, claiming they caused patients to starve, in addition to the tortures of syrups, medicines, enemas, and other sufferings like not being allowed to sleep when drowsy, making a will, having relatives around, and being trapped in a dark room. He praised death by execution, saying it was admirable to die that way—to gaze at the open sky and the crowd, to be comforted with treats and kind words, to have the priest and the people praying for you, and to enter Paradise with the Angels; so that anyone who left this life in one blow was very lucky. As he spoke, he would twist everything to the strangest meanings imaginable. Thus, living in such an odd manner, he eventually reached a state of such extravagant fancies that one morning, in 1521, he was found dead at the foot of a staircase, and he was buried in S. Piero Maggiore.

His disciples were many, and one among them was Andrea del Sarto, who was a host in himself. Piero's portrait I received from Francesco da San Gallo, who was much his friend and intimate companion, and who made it when Piero was old; which Francesco still has a work by the hand of Piero that I must not pass by, a very beautiful head of Cleopatra, with an asp wound round her neck, and two portraits, one of his father Giuliano, and the other of his grandfather Francesco Giamberti, which seem to be alive.

His disciples were numerous, and one of them was Andrea del Sarto, who was quite a character on his own. I got Piero's portrait from Francesco da San Gallo, who was a close friend and companion of his, and he made it when Piero was older. Francesco still has a piece by Piero that I can't overlook—a stunning depiction of Cleopatra, with an asp wrapped around her neck, along with two portraits: one of his father, Giuliano, and the other of his grandfather, Francesco Giamberti, both of which look incredibly lifelike.

Francesco Giamberti.

FRANCESCO GIAMBERTI
(After the panel by Piero di Cosimo.
Hague: Royal Museum, 255)
Bruckmann
View larger image

FRANCESCO GIAMBERTI
(After the panel by Piero di Cosimo.
Hague: Royal Museum, 255)
Bruckmann
View larger image


[Pg 135] BRAMANTE DA URBINO


[Pg 137] LIFE OF BRAMANTE DA URBINO

ARCHITECT

Of very great advantage to architecture, in truth, was the new method of Filippo Brunelleschi, who imitated and restored to the light, after many ages, the noble works of the most learned and marvellous ancients. But no less useful to our age was Bramante, in following the footsteps of Filippo, and making the path of his profession of architecture secure for all who came after him, by means of his courage, boldness, intellect, and science in that art, wherein he had the mastery not of theory only, but of supreme skill and practice. Nor could nature have created a more vigorous intellect, or one to exercise his art and carry it into execution with greater invention and proportion, or with a more thorough knowledge, than Bramante. But no less essential than all this was the election to the Pontificate, at that time, of Julius II, a Pope of great spirit, full of desire to leave memorials behind him. And it was fortunate both for us and for Bramante that he found such a Prince (a thing which rarely happens to men of great genius), at whose expense he might be able to display the worth of his intellect, and that mastery over difficulties which he showed in architecture. His ability was so universal in the buildings that he erected, that the outlines of the cornices, the shafts of the columns, the graceful capitals, the bases, the consoles and corners, the vaults, the staircases, the projections, and every detail of every Order of architecture, contrived from the counsel or model of this craftsman, never failed to astonish all who saw them. Wherefore it appears to me that the everlasting gratitude which is due to the ancients from the intellects that study their works, is also due from them to the labours of Bramante; for if the Greeks were the inventors of architecture, [Pg 138] and the Romans their imitators, Bramante not only imitated what he saw, with new invention, and taught it to us, but also added very great beauty and elaboration to the art, which we see embellished by him at the present day.

Of great benefit to architecture, really, was the new approach by Filippo Brunelleschi, who revived and brought back to light, after many ages, the impressive works of the most learned and remarkable ancients. But just as important for our time was Bramante, who followed in Filippo's footsteps and made the path of architecture secure for all who came after him, through his courage, boldness, intellect, and mastery of the art—not just in theory, but with top-notch skill and practice. Nature could hardly have produced a more dynamic mind, or one capable of practicing his art and executing it with greater creativity, proportion, and thorough understanding than Bramante. Equally essential was the election of Julius II as Pope at that time, a leader bursting with ambition and keen to leave a legacy. It was fortunate for both us and Bramante that he found such a patron (which rarely happens for those of great talent) who enabled him to showcase his intellectual worth and the mastery he displayed in architecture. His talent was so widespread in the buildings he created that the outlines of the cornices, the columns, the elegant capitals, the bases, the consoles and corners, the vaults, the staircases, the projections, and every detail of every architectural order, crafted under his guidance or model, never failed to amaze everyone who saw them. For this reason, it seems to me that the lasting gratitude owed to the ancients by those who study their works should also extend to Bramante's efforts; for if the Greeks invented architecture, [Pg 138] and the Romans were their imitators, Bramante not only replicated what he saw with innovation and taught it to us, but also significantly enhanced the art, which we still see beautified by him today.

He was born at Castel Durante, in the State of Urbino, of poor but honest parentage. In his boyhood, besides reading and writing, he gave much attention to arithmetic; but his father, who had need that he should earn money, perceiving that he delighted much in drawing, applied him, when still a mere boy, to the art of painting; whereupon Bramante gave much study to the works of Fra Bartolommeo, otherwise called Fra Carnovale da Urbino, who painted the panel-picture of S. Maria della Bella at Urbino. But since he always delighted in architecture and perspective, he departed from Castel Durante, and made his way to Lombardy, where he went now to one city, and now to another, working as best he could, but not on things of great cost or much credit, having as yet neither name nor reputation. For this reason he determined at least to see some noteworthy work, and betook himself to Milan, in order to see the Duomo. In that city there was then living one Cesare Cesariano, reputed to be a good geometrician and an able architect, who wrote a commentary on Vitruvius, and, out of despair at not having received for this the remuneration that he had expected, became so strange that he would work no more; and, having grown almost savage, he died more like a beast than like a human being. There was also one Bernardino da Trevio, a Milanese, engineer and architect for the Duomo, and an excellent draughtsman, who was held by Leonardo da Vinci to be a rare master, although his manner was rather crude and somewhat hard in painting. By his hand is a Resurrection of Christ to be seen at the upper end of the cloister of the Grazie, with some very beautiful foreshortenings; and a chapel in fresco in S. Francesco, containing the deaths of S. Peter and S. Paul. He painted many other works in Milan, and he also made a good number in the surrounding district, which are held in esteem; and in our book there is a head of a very beautiful woman, in charcoal and lead-white, which still bears witness to the manner that he followed.

He was born in Castel Durante, in the State of Urbino, to poor but honest parents. As a child, he focused a lot on reading and writing, but his father wanted him to earn money. Noticing his love for drawing, his father got him started in painting when he was still just a boy. Bramante then studied the works of Fra Bartolommeo, also known as Fra Carnovale da Urbino, who painted the panel picture of S. Maria della Bella in Urbino. However, since he was always interested in architecture and perspective, he left Castel Durante and traveled to Lombardy, moving from one city to another, doing whatever work he could find, even though it wasn’t very high profile or well-paid, as he had no name or reputation yet. Because of this, he decided he should at least see some impressive work and headed to Milan to see the Duomo. At that time, there lived a man named Cesare Cesariano, known as a good geometrician and talented architect, who wrote a commentary on Vitruvius. Disappointed by the lack of expected payment for his work, he became so withdrawn that he stopped working altogether; he became almost feral and died more like an animal than a human. There was also Bernardino da Trevio, a Milanese engineer and architect for the Duomo, who was an excellent draftsman, recognized by Leonardo da Vinci as a remarkable master, despite his somewhat rough and hard painting style. He created a Resurrection of Christ at the far end of the cloister of the Grazie, featuring some beautiful foreshortening; and a fresco chapel in S. Francesco, depicting the deaths of S. Peter and S. Paul. He produced many other works in Milan and nearby areas, which are well regarded; and in our book, there is a charcoal and lead-white drawing of a very beautiful woman that still shows the quality of his style.

Interior of Sacristy.

INTERIOR OF SACRISTY
(After Bramante da Urbino.
Milan: S. Satiro)
Brogi
View larger image

INTERIOR OF SACRISTY
(After Bramante da Urbino.
Milan: S. Satiro)
Brogi
View larger image

[Pg 139] But to return to Bramante; having studied that building, and having come to know those engineers, he so took courage, that he resolved to devote himself wholly to architecture. Having therefore departed from Milan, he betook himself, just before the holy year of 1500, to Rome, where he was recognized by some friends, both from his own country and from Lombardy, and received a commission to paint, over the Porta Santa of S. Giovanni Laterano, which is opened for the Jubilee, the coat of arms of Pope Alexander VI, to be executed in fresco, with angels and other figures acting as supporters.

[Pg 139] But back to Bramante; after studying that building and getting to know those engineers, he felt inspired and decided to fully commit himself to architecture. So, he left Milan and, just before the holy year of 1500, headed to Rome, where he was recognized by some friends from his homeland and Lombardy. He received a commission to paint, above the Porta Santa of S. Giovanni Laterano, which opens for the Jubilee, the coat of arms of Pope Alexander VI, to be done in fresco, featuring angels and other figures as supporters.

Bramante had brought some money from Lombardy, and he earned some more in Rome by executing certain works; and this he spent with the greatest economy, since he wished to be able to live independently, and at the same time, without having to work, to be free to take measurements, at his ease, of all the ancient buildings in Rome. And having put his hand to this, he set out, alone with his thoughts; and within no great space of time he had measured all the buildings in that city and in the Campagna without; and he went as far as Naples, and wherever he knew that there were antiquities. He measured all that was at Tivoli and in the Villa of Hadrian, and, as will be related afterwards in the proper place, made great use of it. The mind of Bramante becoming known in this way, the Cardinal of Naples, having noticed him, began to favour him. Whereupon, while Bramante was continuing his studies, the desire came to the said Cardinal to have the cloister of the Frati della Pace rebuilt in travertine, and he gave the charge of this cloister to Bramante, and he, desiring to earn money and to gain the good will of that Cardinal, set himself to work with all possible industry and diligence, and brought it quickly to perfect completion. And although it was not a work of perfect beauty, it gave him a very great name, since there were not many in Rome who followed the profession of architecture with such zeal, study, and resolution as Bramante.

Bramante had brought some money from Lombardy and earned more in Rome by working on various projects; he spent this money very carefully because he wanted to live independently. At the same time, he didn’t want to work constantly, allowing himself the freedom to take measurements of all the ancient buildings in Rome at his own pace. Once he started, he set off alone with his thoughts, and before long, he had measured all the buildings in the city and the surrounding Campagna. He even traveled as far as Naples and wherever he knew there were antiquities. He measured everything at Tivoli and in the Villa of Hadrian, which he would later find useful, as will be explained in the appropriate section. As Bramante's skills became known, the Cardinal of Naples took notice of him and began to support him. While Bramante continued his studies, the Cardinal expressed his desire to have the cloister of the Frati della Pace rebuilt in travertine and assigned the task to Bramante. Eager to earn money and gain the Cardinal's favor, Bramante worked with great dedication and completed it quickly. Although it wasn’t a masterpiece, it brought him significant recognition, as there weren’t many in Rome who pursued the field of architecture with the same passion, diligence, and commitment as Bramante.

At the beginning he served as under-architect to Pope Alexander VI for the fountain of Trastevere, and likewise for that which was made on the Piazza di S. Pietro. He also took part, together with other excellent architects, when his reputation had increased, in the planning [Pg 140] of a great part of the Palace of S. Giorgio, and of the Church of S. Lorenzo in Damaso, at the commission of Raffaello Riario, Cardinal of S. Giorgio, near the Campo di Fiore; which palace, whatever better work may have been executed afterwards, nevertheless was and still is held, on account of its greatness, to be a commodious and magnificent habitation; and the building of this edifice was carried out by one Antonio Montecavallo. Bramante was consulted with regard to the enlargement of S. Jacopo degli Spagnuoli, on the Piazza Navona, and likewise in the deliberations for the building of S. Maria de Anima, which was afterwards carried out by a German architect. From his design, also, was the Palace of Cardinal Adriano da Corneto in the Borgo Nuovo, which was built slowly, and then finally remained unfinished by reason of the flight of that Cardinal; and in like manner, the enlargement of the principal chapel of S. Maria del Popolo was executed from his design.

At the start, he worked as an assistant architect for Pope Alexander VI on the fountain in Trastevere, as well as the one in Piazza di S. Pietro. He also participated, along with other skilled architects, once his reputation had grown, in the planning [Pg 140] of much of the Palace of S. Giorgio and the Church of S. Lorenzo in Damaso, at the request of Raffaello Riario, Cardinal of S. Giorgio, near Campo di Fiore. This palace, despite any better work that may have been done later, was and still is regarded, due to its size, as a comfortable and magnificent residence; the construction of this building was done by Antonio Montecavallo. Bramante was consulted about expanding S. Jacopo degli Spagnuoli in Piazza Navona and also took part in discussions for the construction of S. Maria de Anima, which was later completed by a German architect. His designs also included the Palace of Cardinal Adriano da Corneto in Borgo Nuovo, which was built slowly and ultimately left unfinished due to the Cardinal's departure; similarly, the expansion of the main chapel of S. Maria del Popolo was executed based on his design.

These works brought him so much credit in Rome, that he was considered the best architect, in that he was resolute, prompt, and most fertile in invention; and he was continually employed by all the great persons in that city for their most important undertakings. Wherefore, after Julius II had been elected Pope, in the year 1503, he entered into his service. The fancy had taken that Pontiff to so transform the space that lay between the Belvedere and the Papal Palace, as to give it the aspect of a square theatre, embracing a little valley that ran between the old Papal Palace and the new buildings that Innocent VIII had erected as a habitation for the Popes; and he intended, by means of two corridors, one on either side of this little valley, to make it possible to go from the Belvedere to the Palace under loggie, and also to go from the Palace to the Belvedere in the same way, and likewise, by means of various flights of steps, to ascend to the level of the Belvedere. Whereupon Bramante, who had very good judgment and an inventive genius in such matters, distributed two ranges of columns along the lowest part; first, a very beautiful Doric loggia, similar to the Colosseum of the Savelli (although, in place of half-columns, he used pilasters), and all built of travertine; and over this a second range of the Ionic Order, full of windows, of such a height as to come to the level of the first-floor rooms [Pg 141] of the Papal Palace, and to the level of those of the Belvedere; intending to make, afterwards, a loggia more than four hundred paces long on the side towards Rome, and likewise another on the side towards the wood, with which, one on either hand, he proposed to enclose the valley; into which, after it had been levelled, was to be brought all the water from the Belvedere; and for this a very beautiful fountain was to be made. Of this design, Bramante finished the first corridor, which issues from the Palace and leads to the Belvedere on the side towards Rome, except the upper loggia, which was to go above it. As for the opposite part, on the side towards the wood, the foundations, indeed, were laid, but it could not be finished, being interrupted by the death of Julius, and then by that of Bramante. His design was held to be so beautiful in invention, that it was believed that from the time of the ancients until that day, Rome had seen nothing better. But of the other corridor, as has been said, he left only the foundations, and the labour of finishing it has dragged on down to our own day, when Pius IV has brought it almost to completion.

These works earned him so much respect in Rome that he was seen as the best architect due to his determination, promptness, and creativity; he was constantly employed by all the influential figures in the city for their most significant projects. After Julius II was elected Pope in 1503, he joined his service. The Pope envisioned transforming the area between the Belvedere and the Papal Palace into a square theater that would embrace a small valley between the old Papal Palace and the new buildings that Innocent VIII had constructed as a residence for the Popes. He planned to create two corridors, one on each side of this valley, allowing passage from the Belvedere to the Palace and vice versa under loggias, and also offering various staircases to reach the level of the Belvedere. Bramante, with excellent judgment and a creative mind in these matters, arranged two rows of columns along the bottom; first, a stunning Doric loggia similar to the Savelli's Colosseum (though he used pilasters instead of half-columns), all made from travertine; and above it, a second row of the Ionic Order filled with windows, tall enough to match the first-floor rooms[Pg 141] of the Papal Palace and the Belvedere. He intended to later construct a loggia over four hundred paces long on the side facing Rome, and another on the side facing the woods, which would enclose the valley. After leveling the valley, all the water from the Belvedere was to flow into it, and a beautiful fountain was to be created. Bramante completed the first corridor leading from the Palace to the Belvedere on the Rome side, except for the upper loggia that was to be above it. On the opposite side facing the woods, the foundations were laid but could not be finished due to the deaths of Julius and then Bramante. His design was considered so beautifully inventive that it was believed nothing better had been seen in Rome since ancient times. However, for the other corridor, as mentioned, only the foundations remained, and the work to complete it has continued into the present day, with Pius IV nearly finishing it.

Bramante also erected the head-wall of the Museum of ancient statues in the Belvedere, together with the range of niches; wherein were placed, in his lifetime, the Laocoon, one of the rarest of ancient statues, the Apollo, and the Venus; and the rest of the statues were set up there afterwards by Leo X, such as the Tiber, the Nile, and the Cleopatra, with some others added by Clement VII; and in the time of Paul III and Julius III many important improvements were made, at great expense.

Bramante also built the back wall of the Museum of ancient statues in the Belvedere, along with the series of niches. During his lifetime, these housed the Laocoon, one of the rarest ancient statues, the Apollo, and the Venus. Later, Leo X placed additional statues there, including the Tiber, the Nile, and Cleopatra, along with a few others added by Clement VII. During the reigns of Paul III and Julius III, many significant improvements were made at great expense.

But to return to Bramante; he was very resolute, although he was hindered by the avarice of those who supplied him with the means to work, and he had a marvellous knowledge of the craft of building. This construction at the Belvedere was executed by him with extraordinary speed, and such was his eagerness as he worked, and that of the Pope, who would have liked to see the edifice spring up from the ground, without needing to be built, that the builders of the foundations brought the sand and the solid foundation-clay by night and let[14] it down by day in the presence of Bramante, who caused the foundations to be made [Pg 142] without seeing anything more of the work. This inadvertence was the reason that all his buildings have cracked, and are in danger of falling down, as did this same corridor, of which a piece eighty braccia in length fell to the ground in the time of Clement VII, and was afterwards rebuilt by Pope Paul III, who also had the foundations restored and the whole strengthened.

But to get back to Bramante; he was very determined, even though he faced challenges from the greed of those who provided him with the resources to work. He had an amazing understanding of the building trade. The construction at the Belvedere was carried out by him at an incredible pace, and both he and the Pope were so eager to see the structure rise from the ground as if it didn’t require any construction that the workers brought the sand and solid foundation clay at night and let it down during the day in Bramante's presence, who directed the foundations to be built without overseeing much of the work after that. This lack of attention is why all his buildings have cracked and are at risk of collapsing, just like this corridor, a section of which measuring eighty braccia fell down during Clement VII's time, and was later rebuilt by Pope Paul III, who also had the foundations repaired and the entire structure reinforced.

From his design, also, are many flights of steps in the Belvedere, varied according to their situations, whether high or low, in the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian Orders—a very beautiful work, executed with extraordinary grace. And he had made a model for the whole, which is said to have been a marvellous thing, as may still be imagined from the beginning of the work, unfinished as it is. Moreover, he made a spiral staircase upon mounting columns, in such a way that one can ascend it on horseback; wherein the Doric passes into the Ionic, and the Ionic into the Corinthian, rising from one into the other; a work executed with supreme grace, and with truly excellent art, which does him no less honour than any other thing by his hand that is therein. This invention was copied by Bramante from S. Niccolò at Pisa, as was said in the Lives of Giovanni and Niccola of Pisa.

From his design come many sets of stairs in the Belvedere, arranged based on their height, in the Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian styles—a truly beautiful creation, crafted with remarkable elegance. He also created a model for the entire structure, which is said to have been an incredible sight, as can still be imagined from the unfinished beginning of the work. Additionally, he designed a spiral staircase supported by columns, allowing one to ride a horse up it; here, the Doric transitions into the Ionic, and the Ionic turns into the Corinthian, ascending seamlessly from one to the other. This was executed with exceptional grace and artistry, doing him just as much honor as any other work of his present there. This invention was later copied by Bramante from S. Niccolò in Pisa, as mentioned in the Lives of Giovanni and Niccola of Pisa.

The fancy took Bramante to make, in a frieze on the outer façade of the Belvedere, some letters after the manner of ancient hieroglyphics, representing the name of the Pope and his own, in order to show his ingenuity: and he had begun thus, "Julio II, Pont. Massimo," having caused a head in profile of Julius Cæsar to be made, and a bridge, with two arches, which signified, "Julio II, Pont.," and an obelisk from the Circus Maximus, to represent "Max." At which the Pope laughed, and caused him to make the letters in the ancient manner, one braccio in height, which are there at the present day; saying that he had copied this folly from a door at Viterbo, over which one Maestro Francesco, an architect, had placed his name, carved in the architrave, and represented by a S. Francis (S. Francesco), an arch (arco), a roof (tetto), and a tower (torre), which, interpreted in his own way, denoted, "Maestro Francesco Architettore." The Pope, on account of his ability in architecture, was very well disposed towards him.

The idea struck Bramante to create a frieze on the outer façade of the Belvedere featuring some letters styled like ancient hieroglyphics, representing the names of the Pope and himself to showcase his creativity. He started with "Julius II, Pont. Max." and had a profile of Julius Caesar made, along with a bridge featuring two arches to signify "Julius II, Pont.," and an obelisk from the Circus Maximus to represent "Max." The Pope found this amusing and had him create the letters in the traditional style, each one a braccio high, which are still there today. He remarked that Bramante had copied this idea from a door in Viterbo, where an architect named Maestro Francesco carved his name into the architrave, using representations of St. Francis (S. Francesco), an arch (arco), a roof (tetto), and a tower (torre), which, when interpreted his way, meant "Maestro Francesco Architettore." The Pope appreciated Bramante's architectural skills and was very favorable towards him.

Tempietto.

TEMPIETTO
(After Bramante da Urbino.
Rome: S. Pietro in Montorio)
Anderson
View larger image

TEMPIETTO
(After Bramante da Urbino.
Rome: S. Pietro in Montorio)
Anderson
View larger image

[Pg 143] For these reasons he was rightly held worthy by the aforesaid Pope, who loved him very dearly for his great gifts, to be appointed to the Office of the Piombo, for which he made a machine for printing Bulls, with a very beautiful screw. In the service of that Pontiff Bramante went to Bologna, in the year 1504, when that city returned to the Church; and he occupied himself, throughout the whole war against Mirandola, on many ingenious things of the greatest importance. He made many designs for ground-plans and complete buildings, which he drew very well; and of such there are some to be seen in our book, accurately drawn and executed with very great art. He taught many of the rules of architecture to Raffaello da Urbino; designing for him, for example, the buildings that Raffaello afterwards drew in perspective in that apartment of the Pope wherein there is Mount Parnassus; in which apartment he made a portrait of Bramante taking measurements with a pair of compasses.

[Pg 143] For these reasons, he was rightly regarded as worthy by the aforementioned Pope, who held him in great affection for his remarkable talents, to be appointed to the Office of the Piombo. For this role, he created a machine for printing Bulls, equipped with a beautifully crafted screw. In service of that Pope, Bramante traveled to Bologna in the year 1504 when that city returned to the Church, and he worked on many clever and significant projects throughout the entire war against Mirandola. He produced numerous designs for site plans and complete buildings, which he illustrated exceptionally well; some of these can be found in our book, accurately drawn and executed with great artistry. He taught many architectural principles to Raffaello da Urbino, designing, for instance, the buildings that Raffaello later depicted in perspective in the Pope's apartment featuring Mount Parnassus. In that room, he also created a portrait of Bramante taking measurements with a pair of compasses.

The Pope resolved, having had the Strada Julia straightened out by Bramante, to place in it all the public offices and tribunals of Rome, on account of the convenience which this would bring to the merchants in their business, which up to that time had always been much hindered. Wherefore Bramante made a beginning with the palace that is to be seen by S. Biagio sul Tevere, wherein there is still an unfinished Corinthian temple, a thing of rare excellence. The rest of this beginning is in rustic work, and most beautiful; and it is a great pity that a work so honourable, useful, and magnificent, which is held by the masters of the profession to be the most beautiful example of design in that kind that has ever been seen, should not have been finished. He made, also, in the first cloister of S. Pietro a Montorio, a round temple of travertine, than which nothing more shapely or better conceived, whether in proportion, design, variety, or grace, could be imagined; and even more beautiful would it have been, if the whole extent of the cloister, which is not finished, had been brought to the form that is to be seen in a drawing by his hand. He directed the building, in the Borgo, of the palace which afterwards belonged to Raffaello da Urbino, executed with bricks and mould-castings, the columns and bosses being of the Doric Order and of rustic [Pg 144] work—a very beautiful work—with a new invention in the making of these castings. He also made the design and preparations for the decoration of S. Maria at Loreto, which was afterwards continued by Andrea Sansovino; and an endless number of models for palaces and temples, which are in Rome and throughout the States of the Church.

The Pope decided, after having the Strada Julia straightened by Bramante, to place all the public offices and courts of Rome there for the convenience it would provide to merchants in their business, which had always faced many obstacles until then. As a result, Bramante started with the palace near S. Biagio sul Tevere, where there is still an unfinished Corinthian temple, an exceptional piece. The rest of this initial work is in rustic style and incredibly beautiful; it is a great shame that such an honorable, useful, and magnificent project, considered by experts to be the most beautiful example of its kind ever seen, was never finished. He also created a round temple of travertine in the first cloister of S. Pietro a Montorio, which is unmatched in shape or design, proportion, variety, or elegance; it would have been even more beautiful if the entire cloister, which remains unfinished, had been completed according to a drawing by him. He oversaw the construction in the Borgo of the palace that later belonged to Raffaello da Urbino, built with bricks and mold-castings, featuring Doric Order columns and bosses in rustic work—a very beautiful project—with a new method for making these castings. He also designed and prepared the decorations for S. Maria at Loreto, which were later continued by Andrea Sansovino, along with countless models for palaces and temples found in Rome and throughout the Papal States.

So sublime was the intellect of this marvellous craftsman, that he made a vast design for restoring and rearranging the Papal Palace. And so greatly had his courage grown, on seeing the powers and desires of the Pope rise to the level of his own wishes and genius, that, hearing that he was minded to throw the Church of S. Pietro to the ground, in order to build it anew, he made him an endless number of designs. And among those that he made was one that was very wonderful, wherein he showed the greatest possible judgment, with two bell-towers, one on either side of the façade, as we see it in the coins afterwards struck for Julius II and Leo X by Caradosso, a most excellent goldsmith, who had no peer in making dies, as may still be seen from the medal of Bramante, executed by him, which is very beautiful. And so, the Pope having resolved to make a beginning with the vast and sublime structure of S. Pietro, Bramante caused half of the old church to be pulled down, and put his hand to the work, with the intention that it should surpass, in beauty, art, invention, and design, as well as in grandeur, richness, and adornment, all the buildings that had been erected in that city by the power of the Commonwealth, and by the art and intellect of so many able masters; and with his usual promptness he laid the foundations, and carried the greater part of the building, before the death of the Pope and his own, to the height of the cornice, where are the arches to all the four piers; and these he turned with supreme expedition and art. He also executed the vaulting of the principal chapel, where the recess is, giving his attention at the same time to pressing on the building of the chapel that is called the Chapel of the King of France.

So incredible was the mind of this amazing craftsman that he created a grand plan to restore and reorganize the Papal Palace. His confidence grew immensely as he saw the Pope's ambitions align with his own ideas and creativity. When he learned that the Pope intended to demolish the Church of S. Pietro to rebuild it from scratch, he produced countless designs. Among these, one stood out as truly remarkable; it displayed tremendous insight, featuring two bell towers, one on each side of the façade, resembling those later seen on the coins minted for Julius II and Leo X by Caradosso, a highly skilled goldsmith known for his exceptional craftsmanship, as evident from the beautiful medal of Bramante he produced. As the Pope decided to move forward with the grand and magnificent construction of S. Pietro, Bramante had half of the old church demolished and began the project, aiming for it to surpass all buildings in the city created by the power of the Commonwealth and the skill of many talented masters in terms of beauty, art, innovation, design, grandeur, richness, and decoration. True to his efficient nature, he laid the foundations and completed most of the construction before both the Pope and he passed away, reaching the height of the cornice, where the arches of all four piers are situated, which he shaped with remarkable speed and skill. He also worked on the vaulting of the main chapel, focusing simultaneously on advancing the construction of the chapel known as the Chapel of the King of France.

For this work he invented the method of casting vaults in wooden moulds, in such a manner that patterns of friezes and foliage, like carvings, come out in the plaster; and in the arches of this edifice he showed how they could be turned with flying scaffoldings, a method that we have [Pg 145] since seen followed by Antonio da San Gallo. In the part that was finished by him, the cornice that runs right round the interior is seen to be so graceful, that no other man's hand could take away or alter anything from its design without spoiling it. It is evident from his capitals, which are of olive leaves within, and from all the Doric work on the outer side, which is extraordinarily beautiful, how sublime was the courage of Bramante, whereby, in truth, if he had possessed physical powers equal to the intellect that adorned his spirit, he would most certainly have achieved even more unexampled things than he did. This work, as will be related in the proper places, since his death and down to the present day, has been much mutilated by other architects, insomuch that it may be said that with the exception of four arches which support the tribune, nothing of his has remained there. For Raffaello da Urbino and Giuliano da San Gallo, who carried on the work after the death of Julius II, together with Fra Giocondo of Verona, thought fit to begin to alter it; and after the death of those masters, Baldassarre Peruzzi, in building the Chapel of the King of France, in the transept on the side towards the Campo Santo, changed Bramante's design; and under Paul III Antonio da San Gallo changed it again entirely. Finally, Michelagnolo Buonarroti, sweeping away the countless opinions and superfluous expenses, has brought it to such beauty and perfection as not one of those others ever thought of, which all comes from his judgment and power of design; although he said to me several times that he was only the executor of the design and arrangements of Bramante, seeing that he who originally lays the foundations of a great edifice is its true creator. Vast, indeed, seemed the conception of Bramante in this work, and he gave it a very great beginning, which, even if he had begun on a smaller scale, neither San Gallo nor the others, nor even Buonarroti, would have had enough power of design to increase, although they were able to diminish it; so immense, stupendous, and magnificent was this edifice, and yet Bramante had conceived something even greater.

For this project, he came up with a method of creating vaults using wooden molds, which allowed for detailed patterns of friezes and leaves to emerge in the plaster, resembling carvings. He demonstrated how to construct the arches of this building using flying scaffolding, a technique that we have since seen adopted by Antonio da San Gallo. In the sections he completed, the cornice that runs around the inside is so elegant that no one else could remove or change anything in its design without ruining it. His capitals, which feature olive leaves inside, along with all the stunning Doric work on the exterior, clearly illustrate the bold vision of Bramante. If he had possessed physical abilities equal to the brilliance of his mind, he would have certainly accomplished even more remarkable feats than he did. This work, as will be detailed in the appropriate sections, has been significantly altered by other architects since his death, so much so that it can be said that besides four arches supporting the tribune, none of his original work remains. After the death of Julius II, Raffaello da Urbino and Giuliano da San Gallo, along with Fra Giocondo of Verona, decided to make changes; then, after those masters passed away, Baldassarre Peruzzi altered Bramante's design when building the Chapel of the King of France in the transept facing the Campo Santo. Under Pope Paul III, Antonio da San Gallo completely changed it again. Finally, Michelagnolo Buonarroti, eliminating countless ideas and unnecessary costs, transformed it into a level of beauty and perfection that none of the others ever imagined, which stems from his judgment and design skills. However, he often mentioned to me that he was merely executing Bramante's original designs and plans, pointing out that the person who lays the foundations for a great building is its true creator. Bramante's vision for this project was indeed vast, and he set a remarkable starting point that, even if he had taken on a smaller scale, neither San Gallo nor the others, nor even Buonarroti, would have had the design prowess to enhance it, though they could diminish it; such was the immense, extraordinary, and magnificent nature of this building, and yet Bramante had conceived of something even greater.

It is said that he was so eager to see this structure making progress, that he pulled down many beautiful things in S. Pietro, such as tombs of Popes, paintings, and mosaics, and that for this reason we have lost [Pg 146] all trace of many portraits of distinguished persons, which were scattered throughout that church, which was the principal church of all Christendom. He preserved only the altar of S. Pietro, and the old tribune, round which he made a most beautiful ornament of the Doric Order, all of peperino-stone, to the end that when the Pope came to S. Pietro to say Mass, he might be able to stand within it with all his Court and with the Ambassadors of the Christian Princes; but death prevented him from finishing it entirely, and the Sienese Baldassarre afterwards brought it to completion.

It's said that he was so eager to see this structure progress that he tore down many beautiful things in St. Peter's, such as the tombs of Popes, paintings, and mosaics. Because of this, we've lost [Pg 146] all traces of numerous portraits of notable individuals that were dispersed throughout that church, which was the main church of all Christendom. He only preserved the altar of St. Peter and the old tribune, around which he created a stunning ornament in the Doric style, made of peperino stone, so that when the Pope came to St. Peter's to say Mass, he could stand inside it with his entire Court and the ambassadors of the Christian princes. However, death prevented him from fully completing it, and Baldassarre from Siena later finished the work.

Bramante was a very merry and pleasant person, ever delighting to help his neighbour. He was very much the friend of men of ability, and favoured them in whatever way he could; as may be seen from his kindness to the gracious Raffaello da Urbino, most celebrated of painters, whom he brought to Rome. He always lived in the greatest splendour, doing honour to himself; and in the rank to which his merits had raised him, what he possessed was nothing to what he would have been able to spend. He delighted in poetry, and loved to improvise upon the lyre, or to hear others doing this: and he composed some sonnets, if not as polished as we now demand them, at least weighty and without faults. He was much esteemed by the prelates, and was received by an endless number of noblemen who made his acquaintance. In his lifetime he had very great renown, and even greater after his death, because of which the building of S. Pietro was interrupted for many years. He lived to the age of seventy, and he was borne to his tomb in Rome, with most honourable obsequies, by the Court of the Pope and by all the sculptors, architects, and painters. He was buried in S. Pietro, in the year 1514.

Bramante was a very cheerful and friendly person, always eager to help his neighbors. He was a close friend of talented people and supported them however he could, as seen in his kindness to the gracious Raffaello da Urbino, the most celebrated painter, whom he brought to Rome. He always lived in great style, honoring himself, and with the status his talents earned him, what he possessed was far less than what he could have spent. He enjoyed poetry and loved to improvise on the lyre or listen to others do so; he composed some sonnets that, while not as polished as we expect today, were nonetheless substantial and without faults. He was highly respected by the clergy and received countless noblemen who sought his friendship. During his lifetime, he was very famous, and even more so after his death, which caused the construction of S. Pietro to be paused for many years. He lived to be seventy and was laid to rest in Rome with the utmost honors, attended by the Pope’s court and many sculptors, architects, and painters. He was buried in S. Pietro in the year 1514.

Palazzo Giraud.

PALAZZO GIRAUD
(After Bramante da Urbino. Rome)
Anderson
View larger image

Giraud Palace
(After Bramante da Urbino. Rome)
Anderson
View larger image

Very great was the loss that architecture suffered in the death of Bramante, who was the discoverer of many good methods wherewith he enriched that art, such as the invention of casting vaults, and the secret of stucco; both of which were known to the ancients, but had been lost until his time through the ruin of their buildings. And those who occupy themselves with measuring ancient works of architecture, find in the works of Bramante no less science and design than in any of the former; wherefore, among those who are versed in the profession, he [Pg 147] can be accounted one of the rarest intellects that have adorned our age. He left behind him an intimate friend, Giuliano Leno, who had much to do with the buildings of his time, but was employed rather to make preparations and to carry out the wishes of whoever designed them, than to work on his own account, although he had judgment and great experience.

The loss to architecture was immense with the passing of Bramante, who discovered many effective methods that enriched the field, such as the invention of casting vaults and the technique of stucco. Both of these were known to the ancients but had been lost until his time due to the destruction of their buildings. Those who study ancient architectural works find that Bramante's creations exhibit just as much science and design as any of the earlier ones; thus, among those skilled in the profession, he [Pg 147] is regarded as one of the most exceptional minds of our time. He left behind a close friend, Giuliano Leno, who was heavily involved in building projects of his era, although he was more focused on preparing and executing the ideas of others rather than pursuing his own designs, despite having good judgment and extensive experience.

During his lifetime, Bramante employed in his works one Ventura, a carpenter of Pistoia, who was a man of very good ability, and drew passing well. This Ventura, while in Rome, delighted much in taking measurements of antiquities; and afterwards, wishing to live once more in his native place, he returned to Pistoia. Now it happened in that city, in the year 1509, that a Madonna, which is now called the Madonna della Umiltà, worked miracles; and since many offerings were brought to her, the Signoria that was then governing the city determined to build a temple in her honour. Whereupon Ventura, confronted with this opportunity, made with his own hand a model of an octagonal temple ...[15] braccia in breadth and ... braccia in height, with a vestibule or closed portico in front, very ornate within and truly beautiful. This having given satisfaction to the Signoria and to the chief men of the city, the building was begun according to the plans of Ventura, who, having laid the foundations of the vestibule and the temple, completely finished the vestibule, which he made very rich in pilasters and cornices of the Corinthian Order, with other carved stonework; while all the vaults in that work were made in like manner, with squares surrounded by mouldings, also in stone, and filled with rosettes. Afterwards, the octagonal temple was also carried to the height of the last cornice, from which the vaulting of the tribune was to rise, during the lifetime of Ventura; and since he was not very experienced in works of that size, he did not consider how the weight of the tribune might be safely laid on the building, but made within the thickness of the wall, at the first range of windows, and at the second, where the others are, a passage that runs right round, whereby he contrived to weaken the walls so much, that, the edifice being without buttresses at the base, it was dangerous [Pg 148] to raise a vault over it, and particularly on the angles at the corners, upon which all the weight of the vault of that tribune must rest. Wherefore, after the death of Ventura, there was no architect with courage enough to raise that vault: nay, they had caused long and stout beams of timber to be brought to the place, in order to make a tent-shaped roof; but this did not please the citizens, and they would not have it put into execution. And so the building remained for many years without a roof, until, in the year 1561, the Wardens of Works besought Duke Cosimo that his Excellency should so favour them as to cause that tribune to be vaulted. Whereupon, in order to meet their wishes, the Duke ordered Giorgio Vasari to go there and see whether he could find some method of vaulting it; and he, having done this, made a model raising the building to the height of eight braccia above the cornice that Ventura had left, in order to make buttresses for it; and he decreased the breadth of the passage that runs right round between the walls, and reinforced the building with buttresses, besides binding the corners and the parts below the passages that Ventura had made, between the windows, with stout keys of iron, double at the angles; which secured the whole in such a manner that the vault could be raised with safety. Whereupon his Excellency was pleased to visit the place, and, being satisfied with everything, gave orders for the work to be executed; and so all the buttresses have been built, and a beginning has already been made with the raising of the cupola. Thus, then, the work of Ventura will become richer, greater in size and adornment, and better in proportions; but he truly deserves to have record made of him, since that building is the most noteworthy modern work in the city of Pistoia.

During his life, Bramante worked with a carpenter named Ventura from Pistoia, who was skilled and had a talent for drawing. While in Rome, Ventura enjoyed measuring ancient structures; later, he decided to return to his hometown. In 1509, a miraculous Madonna, now known as the Madonna della Umiltà, was revered in Pistoia, prompting the city’s authorities to build a temple in her honor. Ventura saw this as an opportunity and personally created a model for an octagonal temple ...[15] braccia wide and ... braccia tall, featuring a beautifully ornate vestibule or enclosed porch. This design pleased the city officials and prominent citizens, leading to the construction based on Ventura's plans. He laid the foundations for both the vestibule and the temple, completing the vestibule rich in Corinthian pilasters, cornices, and intricate stone carvings. The vaults were also crafted in a similar style, with stone squares surrounded by moldings and filled with rosettes. The octagonal temple was raised to the height of the top cornice during Ventura's lifetime, ready for the vaulting of the tribune. Since he lacked experience with such large structures, he didn't consider how to support the weight of the tribune properly. Instead, he created passages within the thickness of the walls at the first and second window levels, which weakened the walls significantly, making it unsafe to build a vault, especially at the corners that would bear the tribune's weight. After Ventura's death, no architect had the confidence to construct that vault, and they even brought in long, sturdy timber beams to create a tent-like roof, which the citizens rejected. The building remained without a roof for many years until, in 1561, the Wardens of Works asked Duke Cosimo for assistance in vaulting the tribune. To help, the Duke sent Giorgio Vasari to find a solution. Vasari proposed a design that raised the structure eight braccia above the cornice Ventura left, added buttresses, and reduced the width of the passage between the walls. He reinforced the building with buttresses and secured the corners and lower sections with strong iron keys, double at the angles, ensuring the vault could be safely constructed. The Duke visited the site, approved the plans, and ordered the work to proceed. Consequently, all the buttresses were built, and the construction of the dome has begun. Thus, Ventura's work will be enhanced, larger, more ornate, and better proportioned, deserving recognition, as it remains one of the most significant modern projects in Pistoia.


[Pg 149] FRA BARTOLOMMEO DI SAN MARCO


[Pg 151] LIFE OF FRA BARTOLOMMEO DI SAN MARCO

[BACCIO DELLA PORTA]

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

Near the territory of Prato, which is ten miles distant from Florence, in a village called Savignano, was born Bartolommeo, known, according to the Tuscan custom, by the name of Baccio. He, having shown in his childhood not merely inclination, but also aptitude, for drawing, was placed, through the good services of Benedetto da Maiano, with Cosimo Rosselli, and lodged in the house of some relatives of his own, who lived at the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini; where he stayed for many years, so that he was never called or known by any other name than that of Baccio della Porta.

Near the area of Prato, which is ten miles from Florence, in a village called Savignano, Bartolommeo was born, known by the Tuscan custom as Baccio. He showed not only an interest but also a talent for drawing as a child, so thanks to the good influence of Benedetto da Maiano, he was placed with Cosimo Rosselli and stayed with some relatives of his own who lived at the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini. He lived there for many years, so he was always called and recognized by the name Baccio della Porta.

After taking his leave of Cosimo Rosselli, he began to study with great devotion the works of Leonardo da Vinci; and in a short time he made such proficience and such progress in colouring, that he acquired the name and reputation of being one of the best young men of his art, both in colouring and in drawing. He had a companion in Mariotto Albertinelli, who in a short time acquired his manner passing well; and together with him he executed many pictures of Our Lady, which are scattered throughout Florence. To speak of all these would take too long, and I will mention only some excellently painted by Baccio. There is one, containing a Madonna, in the house of Filippo di Averardo Salviati, which is most beautiful, and which he holds very dear and in great price. Another was bought not long since, at a sale of old furniture, by Pier Maria delle Pozze, a person greatly devoted to pictures, who, having recognized its beauty, will not let it go for any sum of money; in which work is a Madonna executed with extraordinary diligence. Piero del [Pg 152] Pugliese had a little Madonna of marble, in very low relief, a very rare work by the hand of Donatello, for which, in order to do it honour, he caused a wooden tabernacle to be made, with two little doors to enclose it. This he gave to Baccio della Porta, who painted, on the inner side of the doors, two little scenes, of which one was the Nativity of Christ, and the other His Circumcision; which Baccio executed with little figures after the manner of miniatures, in such a way that it would not be possible to do better work in oils; and then he painted Our Lady receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, in chiaroscuro, and likewise in oils, on the outer side of the same little doors, so as to be seen when they are closed. This work is now in the study of Duke Cosimo, wherein he keeps all his little antique figures of bronze, medals, and other rare pictures in miniature; and it is treasured by his most illustrious Excellency as a rare thing, as indeed it is.

After saying goodbye to Cosimo Rosselli, he began to study with great enthusiasm the works of Leonardo da Vinci; and before long, he made such significant improvements in coloring that he earned the name and reputation of being one of the best young artists in his field, both in coloring and drawing. He had a partner in Mariotto Albertinelli, who quickly adopted his style well; together, they created many images of Our Lady, which can be found throughout Florence. To mention all these would take too long, so I will highlight only a few beautifully painted by Baccio. One features a Madonna in the home of Filippo di Averardo Salviati, which is extremely beautiful and cherished, and he holds it in high regard. Another was recently purchased at an auction of old furniture by Pier Maria delle Pozze, a person very fond of art, who recognized its beauty and refuses to sell it for any amount of money; this piece features a Madonna created with exceptional care. Piero del [Pg 152] Pugliese had a small marble Madonna in very low relief, a rare work by Donatello, for which he commissioned a wooden tabernacle with two small doors to honor it. He gave this to Baccio della Porta, who painted, on the inside of the doors, two small scenes: one depicting the Nativity of Christ and the other His Circumcision; Baccio executed these with tiny figures in a miniature style that couldn't be surpassed in oils. On the outside of the same little doors, he painted Our Lady receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, also in chiaroscuro and oils, so it could be seen when they are closed. This work is now in Duke Cosimo's study, where he keeps all his small antique bronze figures, medals, and other rare miniature paintings; it is treasured by his prestigious Excellency as a unique and valuable piece, as indeed it is.

The Deposition from the Cross

FRA BARTOLOMMEO DI SAN MARCO: THE DEPOSITION FROM THE CROSS
(Florence: Pitti, 64. Panel)
View larger image

FRA BARTOLOMMEO DI SAN MARCO: THE DEPOSITION FROM THE CROSS
(Florence: Pitti, 64. Panel)
View larger image

Baccio was beloved in Florence for his virtues, for he was assiduous in his work, quiet and good by nature, and a truly God-fearing man; he had a great liking for a life of peace, and he shunned vicious company, delighted much in hearing sermons, and always sought the society of learned and serious persons. And in truth, it is seldom that nature creates a man of good parts and a gentle craftsman, without also providing him, after some time, with peace and favour, as she did for Baccio, who, as will be told below, obtained all that he desired. The report having spread abroad that he was no less good than able, his fame so increased that he was commissioned by Gerozzo di Monna Venna Dini to paint the chapel wherein the bones of the dead are kept, in the cemetery of the Hospital of S. Maria Nuova. There he began a Judgment in fresco, which he executed with such diligence and beauty of manner in the part which he finished, that he acquired extraordinary fame thereby, in addition to what he had already, and became greatly celebrated, on account of his having represented with excellent conceptions the Glory of Paradise, and Christ with the twelve Apostles judging the twelve Tribes, wherein the figures are soft in colouring and most beautifully draped. Moreover, in those figures that are being dragged to Hell, in the part that was designed but left unfinished, one sees the despair, grief, and shame of [Pg 153] everlasting death, even as one perceives contentment and gladness in those that are being saved; although this work remained unfinished, since Baccio was inclined to give his attention more to religion than to painting. For there was living in S. Marco, at this time, Fra Girolamo Savonarola of Ferrara, of the Order of Preaching Friars, a very famous theologian; and Baccio, going continually to hear his preaching, on account of the devotion that he felt for him, contracted a very strait intimacy with him, and passed almost all his time in the convent, having also become the friend of the other friars. Now it happened that Fra Girolamo, continuing his preaching, and crying out every day from the pulpit that lascivious pictures, music, and amorous books often lead the mind to evil, became convinced that it was not right to keep in houses where there were young girls painted figures of naked men and women. And at the next Carnival—when it was the custom in the city to make little huts of faggots and other kinds of wood on the public squares, and on the Tuesday evening, according to ancient use, to burn these, with amorous dances, in which men and women, joining hands, danced round these fires, singing certain airs—the people were so inflamed by Fra Girolamo, and he wrought upon them so strongly with his words, that on that day they brought to the place a vast quantity of nude figures, both in painting and in sculpture, many by the hand of excellent masters, and likewise books, lutes, and volumes of songs, which was a most grievous loss, particularly for painting. Thither Baccio carried all the drawings of nudes that he had made by way of studies, and he was followed by Lorenzo di Credi and by many others, who had the name of Piagnoni. And it was not long before Baccio, on account of the affection that he bore to Fra Girolamo, made a very beautiful portrait of him in a picture, which was then taken to Ferrara; but not long ago it came back to Florence, and it is now in the house of Filippo di Alamanno Salviati, who, since it is by the hand of Baccio, holds it very dear.

Baccio was loved in Florence for his good character. He was dedicated to his work, naturally kind, and genuinely religious. He appreciated a peaceful life and avoided bad company, enjoying sermons and always seeking the company of intelligent, serious people. In fact, it's rare for someone with such qualities and craftsmanship not to eventually find peace and favor, which is what happened for Baccio, who, as will be explained later, got everything he wished for. Word spread that he was just as good as he was talented, and his reputation grew so much that Gerozzo di Monna Venna Dini commissioned him to paint the chapel where the bones of the deceased are kept at the Cemetery of S. Maria Nuova. There, he started a fresco of the Judgment, which he executed with such care and beauty in the parts he finished that it earned him extraordinary fame, adding to what he already had, especially for his excellent depictions of the Glory of Paradise and Christ with the twelve Apostles judging the twelve Tribes. The figures were soft in color and beautifully draped. Moreover, in the figures being dragged to Hell—part of which was planned but left unfinished—one could see despair, grief, and shame of everlasting death, while those being saved appeared joyful and content. Although this work remained unfinished because Baccio focused more on religion than painting. At that time, Fra Girolamo Savonarola from Ferrara, a renowned theologian of the Order of Preaching Friars, was preaching at S. Marco. Baccio frequently attended his sermons, feeling a deep devotion to him, and he spent almost all his time in the convent, forming friendships with the other friars. As Fra Girolamo continued preaching, he often proclaimed that suggestive images, music, and romantic books could lead people astray, convincing many that it wasn't right to have images of naked men and women in homes with young girls. During the next Carnival—when it was customary in the city to build wooden huts in public squares and, on Tuesday evening, to burn them with romantic dances, where men and women would hold hands and dance around the fires while singing—the people were so inspired by Fra Girolamo that on that day they brought a huge amount of nude figures, both paintings and sculptures, many from renowned masters, as well as books, lutes, and song volumes. This was a tremendous loss, particularly for painting. Baccio brought all his studies of nude drawings to the event, followed by Lorenzo di Credi and many others known as the Piagnoni. It wasn't long before Baccio, out of affection for Fra Girolamo, created a beautiful portrait of him, which was taken to Ferrara but recently returned to Florence. It is now in the home of Filippo di Alamanno Salviati, who treasures it because it was created by Baccio.

It happened, after this, that one day the opponents of Fra Girolamo rose against him, in order to take him and deliver him over to the hands of justice, on account of the disturbances that he had caused in the city; and his friends, seeing this, also banded themselves together, to the [Pg 154] number of more than five hundred, and shut themselves up in S. Marco, and Baccio with them, on account of the great affection that he had for their party. It is true that, being a person of little courage, nay, even timorous and mean-spirited, and hearing an attack being made a little time after this on the convent, and men being wounded and killed, he began to have serious doubts about himself. For which reason he made a vow that if he were to escape from that turmoil, he would straightway assume the habit of that Order; which vow he carried out afterwards most faithfully, for when the uproar had ceased, and Fra Girolamo had been taken and condemned to death, as the writers of history relate with more detail, Baccio betook himself to Prato and became a monk in S. Domenico, in that city, on July 26, in the year 1500, as is found written in the chronicles of that same convent in which he assumed the habit; to the great displeasure of all his friends, who were grieved beyond measure at having lost him, and particularly because they heard that he had taken it into his head to forsake his painting.

It happened that one day, after this, Fra Girolamo's opponents rose up against him to capture him and turn him over to the authorities due to the unrest he had caused in the city. His friends, seeing this, rallied together, numbering more than five hundred, and locked themselves in S. Marco, with Baccio among them because of his deep loyalty to their cause. However, he was a person of little courage, shy and timid, and after hearing news of an attack on the convent where people were being wounded and killed, he began to have serious doubts about himself. For this reason, he made a vow that if he were to escape the chaos, he would immediately take on the habit of that Order; a vow he later fulfilled faithfully. When the disturbances ended and Fra Girolamo was captured and sentenced to death, as recorded by historians in more detail, Baccio went to Prato and became a monk at S. Domenico in that city on July 26, 1500, as noted in the chronicles of that same convent where he took the habit. This decision greatly upset all his friends, who were deeply saddened by his loss, especially because they learned he had decided to give up painting.

Whereupon Mariotto Albertinelli, his friend and companion, at the entreaties of Gerozzo Dini, took over the materials of Fra Bartolommeo—which was the name given by the Prior to Baccio, on investing him with the habit—and brought to completion the work of the Ossa in S. Maria Nuova; where he portrayed from life the Director of the Hospital at that time, and some friars skilled in surgery, with Gerozzo, the patron of the work, and his wife, full-length figures on their knees, upon the walls on either side; and in a nude figure that is seated, he portrayed Giuliano Bugiardini, his pupil, as a young man, with long locks according to the custom of that time, in which each separate hair might be counted, so carefully are they painted. He made there, likewise, his own portrait, in the head, with long locks, of a figure that is issuing from one of the tombs; and in that work, in the region of the blessed, there is also the portrait of Fra Giovanni da Fiesole, the painter, whose Life we have written. This painting was executed wholly in fresco, both by Fra Bartolommeo and by Mariotto, so that it has remained, and still remains, marvellously fresh, and is held in esteem by craftsmen, since it is scarcely possible to do better in that kind of work.

Whereupon Mariotto Albertinelli, his friend and companion, at the request of Gerozzo Dini, took over the materials of Fra Bartolommeo—which was the name given by the Prior to Baccio when he was given the habit—and finished the work of the Ossa in S. Maria Nuova; where he portrayed from life the Director of the Hospital at that time, and some friars skilled in surgery, with Gerozzo, the patron of the work, and his wife, depicted as full-length figures on their knees on the walls on either side; and in a seated nude figure, he depicted Giuliano Bugiardini, his pupil, as a young man, with long hair according to the fashion of that time, where each individual hair could be counted, so meticulously are they painted. He also included his own portrait, with long hair, in the head of a figure that is emerging from one of the tombs; and in this work, in the area of the blessed, there is also the portrait of Fra Giovanni da Fiesole, the painter, whose Life we have written. This painting was executed entirely in fresco, both by Fra Bartolommeo and by Mariotto, so that it has remained, and still remains, remarkably fresh, and is highly regarded by craftsmen, as it is nearly impossible to achieve better quality in that type of work.

The Holy Family.

THE HOLY FAMILY
(After the panel by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Rome: Corsini Gallery, 579)
Anderson
View larger image

THE HOLY FAMILY
(After the panel by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Rome: Corsini Gallery, 579)
Anderson
View larger image

[Pg 155] When Fra Bartolommeo had been many months in Prato, he was sent by his superiors to take up his abode in S. Marco at Florence, and on account of his virtues he was received very warmly by the friars of that convent. In those days Bernardo del Bianco had caused to be erected, in the Badia of Florence, a chapel of grey-stone, full of carving, and very rich and beautiful, from the design of Benedetto da Rovezzano: which chapel was and still is much esteemed on account of some ornamental work of great variety, wherein Benedetto Buglioni placed, in some niches, angels and other figures made of glazed terra-cotta, in the round, to adorn it the more, with friezes containing cherubs and the devices of Bianco. And Bernardo, wishing to set up in the chapel a panel-picture that should be worthy of that adornment, and conceiving the idea that Fra Bartolommeo would be the right man for the work, sought in every possible way, through the intervention of his friends, to persuade him. Fra Bartolommeo was living in his convent, giving his attention to nothing save the divine offices and the duties of his Rule, although often besought by the Prior and by his dearest friends that he should work again at his painting; and for more than four years he had refused to touch a brush. But on this occasion, being pressed by Bernardo del Bianco, at length he began the panel-picture of S. Bernard, in which the Saint is writing, and gazing with such deep contemplation at the Madonna, with the Child in her arms, being borne by many angels and children, all coloured with great delicacy, that there is clearly perceived in him a certain celestial quality, I know not what, which seems, to him who studies it with attention, to shine out over that work, into which Baccio put much diligence and love; not to mention an arch executed in fresco, which is above it. He also made some pictures for Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici; and for Agnolo Doni he painted a picture of Our Lady, which stands on the altar of a chapel in his house—a work of extraordinary beauty.

[Pg 155] After spending several months in Prato, Fra Bartolommeo was sent by his superiors to stay at S. Marco in Florence. Due to his virtues, he was warmly welcomed by the friars at that convent. During that time, Bernardo del Bianco had a chapel built in the Badia of Florence, made of grey stone and richly adorned, designed by Benedetto da Rovezzano. This chapel was, and still is, highly regarded for its intricate decorative work, where Benedetto Buglioni placed angels and other figures made of glazed terra-cotta in niches, along with friezes featuring cherubs and Bianco's symbols. Wanting to create a panel painting worthy of such decoration, Bernardo believed Fra Bartolommeo was the perfect choice for the job and sought, through various means and friends, to convince him. While Fra Bartolommeo had been living at his convent, focusing solely on religious duties and ignoring his painting for more than four years despite encouragement from the Prior and close friends, he was eventually persuaded by Bernardo del Bianco to begin the panel painting of St. Bernard. In this piece, the Saint writes while deeply contemplating the Madonna, who holds the Child in her arms and is surrounded by numerous angels and children, all rendered with remarkable delicacy. There’s an ethereal quality in this work that stands out to anyone who studies it closely, showcasing the effort and love that Baccio put into it, along with a fresco arch above. He also created some works for Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici, and he painted a depiction of Our Lady for Agnolo Doni, which is displayed on the altar of a chapel in his home—an extraordinary piece of beauty.

At this time the painter Raffaello da Urbino came to Florence to study his art, and taught the best principles of perspective to Fra Bartolommeo; and desiring to acquire the friar's manner of colouring, and being pleased with his handling of colours and his method of harmonizing [Pg 156] them, Raffaello was always in his company. Fra Bartolommeo painted about the same time, in S. Marco at Florence, a panel with an infinite number of figures, which is now in the possession of the King of France, having been presented to him after being exposed to view for many months in S. Marco. Afterwards, he painted another in that convent, containing an endless number of figures, in place of the one that was sent into France; in which picture are some children who are flying in the air and holding open a canopy, executed with such good drawing and art, and with such strong relief, that they appear to stand out from the panel, while the colouring of the flesh reveals that beauty and excellence which every able craftsman seeks to give to his pictures; and this work is still considered at the present day to be most excellent. In it are many figures surrounding a Madonna, all most admirable, and executed with grace, feeling, boldness, spirit, and vivacity; and coloured, moreover, in so striking a manner, that they seem to be in relief, since he wished to show that he was able not only to draw, but also to give his figures force and make them stand out by means of the darkness of the shadows, as may be seen in some children who are round a canopy, upholding it, who, as they fly through the air, almost project from the panel. Besides this, there is an Infant Christ who is marrying S. Catherine the Nun, than which it would not be possible to paint anything more lifelike with the dark colouring that he used. There is a circle of saints on one side diminishing in perspective, round the depth of a great recess, who are distributed with such fine design that they seem to be real; and the same may be seen on the other side. And in truth, in this manner of colouring, he imitated to a great extent the works of Leonardo; particularly in the darks, for which he used printer's smoke-black and the black of burnt ivory. This panel has now become much darker than it was when he painted it, on account of those blacks, which have kept growing heavier and darker. In the foreground, among the principal figures, he made a S. George in armour, who has a standard in his hand, a bold, spirited, and vivacious figure, in a beautiful attitude. There is also a S. Bartholomew, standing, a figure that deserves the highest praise; with two children who are playing, one on a lute, and the other on a lyre, one of whom he [Pg 157] made with a leg drawn up and his instrument resting upon it, and with the hands touching the strings in the act of running over them, an ear intent on the harmony, the head upraised, and the mouth slightly open, in such a way that whoever beholds him cannot persuade himself that he should not also hear the voice. No less lifelike is the other, who, leaning on one side, and bending over with one ear to the lyre, appears to be listening to learn how far it is in accord with the sound of the lute and the voice, while, with his eyes fixed on the ground, and his ear turned intently towards his companion, who is playing and singing, he seeks to follow in harmony with the air. These conceptions and expressions are truly ingenious; the children, who are seated, and clothed in veiling, are marvellous and executed with great industry by the practised hand of Fra Bartolommeo; and the whole work is brought out into strong relief by a fine gradation of dark shadows.

At this time, the painter Raffaello da Urbino came to Florence to study his art and taught Fra Bartolommeo the best principles of perspective. Raffaello, wanting to learn the friar's way of coloring and appreciating his skill with colors and harmony, spent a lot of time with him. Around the same period, Fra Bartolommeo painted a panel in S. Marco, Florence, featuring countless figures, which is now owned by the King of France after being exhibited for several months in S. Marco. Later, he painted another piece for the convent, filled with endless figures to replace the one sent to France. In this new painting, there are children flying in the air, holding a canopy, rendered with such skill and craftsmanship that they seem to pop out from the panel. The flesh coloring displays the beauty and excellence that every skilled artist aims for; this work is still regarded as outstanding today. It features many figures surrounding a Madonna, all beautifully done, with grace, emotion, boldness, spirit, and liveliness; they are also so strikingly colored that they appear three-dimensional, as he aimed to illustrate not just his ability to draw but also to give his figures depth, enhanced by the shadows. This effect is visible with some children who uphold a canopy, who, as they soar through the air, almost seem to emerge from the panel. Also included is an Infant Christ marrying S. Catherine the Nun, depicted in such a lifelike manner using dark tones that it's incredibly realistic. On one side, there’s a circle of saints receding into perspective around the deep recess, arranged with such finesse that they appear real; the same is seen on the opposite side. In truth, in this coloring style, he greatly emulated Leonardo's works, especially in the darker areas, using printer’s smoke-black and burnt ivory black. The panel has become much darker over time due to these blacks becoming heavier. In the foreground, among the main figures, there’s a bold, spirited S. George in armor holding a standard, presented in a striking pose. There’s also a commendable S. Bartholomew standing, alongside two children playing: one on a lute and the other on a lyre. One child is drawn with a leg raised, resting his instrument on it, his hands touching the strings as if playing, with an ear focused on the sound, his head up, and mouth slightly open, making it seem as if anyone looking at him should hear the music. Equally lifelike is the other child, leaning to one side, bent over with one ear to the lyre, seemingly listening to harmonize with the lute and voice, his eyes fixed on the ground and his ear turned towards his companion playing and singing. These ideas and expressions are genuinely clever; the seated children, dressed in veils, are remarkable and thoughtfully crafted by the skilled hands of Fra Bartolommeo, and the entire artwork is enhanced by a beautiful gradation of dark shadows.

A little time afterwards he painted another panel, to stand opposite to the former, and containing a Madonna surrounded by some saints, which is held to be a good work. He won extraordinary praise for having introduced a method of blending the colouring of his figures in such a way as to add a marvellous degree of harmony to art, making them appear to be in relief and alive, and executing them with supreme perfection of manner.

A little while later, he painted another panel to go opposite the first one, featuring a Madonna surrounded by several saints, which is considered a good work. He received high praise for introducing a technique that blended the colors of his figures in a way that added a remarkable level of harmony to the art, making them look three-dimensional and lifelike, executed with exceptional skill.

Hearing much of the noble works made in Rome by Michelagnolo, and likewise those of the gracious Raffaello, and being roused by the fame, which was continually reaching him, of the marvels wrought by those two divine craftsmen, with leave from his Prior he betook himself to Rome. There he was entertained by Fra Mariano Fetti, Friar of the Piombo, for whom he painted two pictures of S. Peter and S. Paul at his Convent of S. Silvestro a Monte Cavallo. But since he did not succeed in working as well in the air of Rome as he had done in that of Florence, while the vast number of works that he saw, what with the ancient and the modern, bewildered him so that much of the ability and excellence that he believed himself to possess, fell away from him, he determined to depart, leaving to Raffaello the charge of finishing one of those pictures, that of S. Peter, which he had not completed; which picture was [Pg 158] retouched all over by the hand of the marvellous Raffaello, and given to Fra Mariano.

Hearing a lot about the amazing works created in Rome by Michelangelo and the beautiful ones by Raphael, and being inspired by the ongoing buzz around the incredible achievements of these two master artists, he got permission from his Prior and traveled to Rome. There, he was hosted by Fra Mariano Fetti, a friar of the Piombo, for whom he painted two pictures of St. Peter and St. Paul at the Convent of St. Silvestro a Monte Cavallo. However, he found that he couldn't work as well in the atmosphere of Rome as he had in Florence. The overwhelming amount of art around him, both ancient and modern, left him confused, causing him to feel that much of the skill and talent he thought he had slipped away from him. He decided to leave, handing over the task of finishing one of those pictures, St. Peter, which he hadn't completed, to Raphael. That picture was [Pg 158] entirely retouched by the incredible Raphael and given to Fra Mariano.

Thus, then, Fra Bartolommeo returned to Florence. There he had been accused many times of not knowing how to paint nudes; for which reason he resolved to put himself to the test, and to show by means of his labour that he was as well fitted as any other master for the highest achievements of his art. Whereupon, to prove this, he painted a picture of S. Sebastian, naked, very lifelike in the colouring of the flesh, sweet in countenance, and likewise executed with corresponding beauty of person, whereby he won infinite praise from the craftsmen. It is said that, while this figure was exposed to view in the church, the friars found, through the confessional, women who had sinned at the sight of it, on account of the charm and melting beauty of the lifelike reality imparted to it by the genius of Fra Bartolommeo; for which reason they removed it from the church and placed it in the chapter-house, where it did not remain long before it was bought by Giovan Battista della Palla and sent to the King of France.

Thus, Fra Bartolommeo returned to Florence. There, he had been repeatedly accused of not being able to paint nudes, which prompted him to put himself to the test and show through his work that he was just as capable as any other master in achieving the highest goals of his art. To prove this, he created a painting of S. Sebastian, depicted nude, with incredibly lifelike skin tones, a gentle expression, and executed with matching beauty, earning him immense praise from fellow artists. It is said that when this painting was displayed in the church, the friars found women confessing to sins inspired by the charm and captivating beauty brought to life by Fra Bartolommeo’s genius. Because of this, they removed it from the church and placed it in the chapter house, but it didn't stay there long before being purchased by Giovan Battista della Palla and sent to the King of France.

S. Mark.

S. MARK
(After the painting by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Florence: Pitti, 125)
Anderson
View larger image

S. MARK
(After the painting by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Florence: Pitti, 125)
Anderson
View larger image

Fra Bartolommeo had fallen into a rage against the joiners who made the ornamental frames for his panels and pictures, for it was their custom, as it still is at the present day, always to cover an eighth part of the figures with the projecting inner edges of the frames. He determined, therefore, to invent some means of doing without frames for panels; and for this S. Sebastian he caused the panel to be made in the form of a half-circle, wherein he drew a niche in perspective, which has the appearance of being carved in relief in the panel. Thus, painting a frame all round, he made an ornament for the figure in the middle; and he did the same for our S. Vincent, and for the S. Mark that will be described after the S. Vincent. For the arch of a door leading into the sacristy, he painted in oils, on wood, a figure of S. Vincent, a brother of that Order, representing him in the act of preaching on the Judgment, so that there may be perceived in his gestures, and particularly in his head, that vehemence and fury which are generally seen in the faces of preachers, when they are doing their utmost, with threats of the vengeance of God, to lead men hardened in sin into the perfect life; in [Pg 159] such a manner that this figure appears, to one who studies it with attention, to be not painted but real and alive, with such strong relief is it executed; and it is a pity that it is all cracking and spoiling, on account of its having been painted with fresh coats of colour on fresh size, as I said of the works of Pietro Perugino in the Convent of the Ingesuati.

Fra Bartolommeo had gotten really angry with the carpenters who made the decorative frames for his panels and pictures because, just like today, they always covered part of the figures with the protruding inner edges of the frames. So, he decided to come up with a way to create panels without frames. For S. Sebastian, he had the panel shaped like a half-circle, where he painted a niche in perspective that looks like it’s carved in relief within the panel. By painting a frame all around, he created an ornament for the figure in the center; he did the same for our S. Vincent and for S. Mark, which will be described after S. Vincent. For the arch of a door leading into the sacristy, he painted an oil figure of S. Vincent on wood, depicting him preaching about Judgment. In his gestures, and especially in his face, you can see the passion and intensity that preachers often have when they’re trying their hardest to lead sinful people toward a better life, in [Pg 159] such a way that anyone who looks closely at the figure would think it’s not a painting but a real living being, thanks to the strong relief of the work; it’s a shame that it’s all cracking and falling apart because it was painted with fresh layers of color on fresh size, as I mentioned about Pietro Perugino’s works in the Convent of the Ingesuati.

The fancy took him, in order to show that he was able to make large figures—for he had been told that his manner was that of a miniaturist—to paint on panel, for the wall in which is the door of the choir, a figure of S. Mark the Evangelist, five braccia in height, and executed with very good draughtsmanship and supreme excellence.

The idea struck him to demonstrate that he could create large-scale works—since he had been told his style was more suited for miniatures—by painting on a panel for the wall where the choir door is located a figure of St. Mark the Evangelist, five braccia tall, completed with great skill and exceptional quality.

After this, Salvadore Billi, a Florentine merchant, on his return from Naples, having heard the fame of Fra Bartolommeo, and having seen his works, caused him to paint a panel-picture of Christ the Saviour, in allusion to his own name, with the four Evangelists round Him; wherein, at the foot, are also two little boys upholding the globe of the world, whose flesh, fresh and tender, is excellently painted, as is the whole work, in which there are likewise two prophets that are much extolled. This panel stands in the Nunziata at Florence, below the great organ, according to the wish of Salvadore; it is a very beautiful work, finished by Fra Bartolommeo with much lovingness and great perfection; and it is surrounded by an ornament of marble, all carved by the hand of Pietro Rosselli.

After this, Salvadore Billi, a merchant from Florence, returned from Naples and, having heard about the talent of Fra Bartolommeo and seen his works, commissioned him to paint a panel featuring Christ the Savior, reflecting his own name, with the four Evangelists around Him. At the bottom, there are also two little boys holding up the globe of the world, their fresh and tender flesh beautifully painted, along with the entire piece, which also includes two well-regarded prophets. This panel is located in the Nunziata in Florence, below the grand organ, as Salvadore requested. It is a stunning work, finished by Fra Bartolommeo with great love and skill; and it is framed by a marble decoration, all carved by the hand of Pietro Rosselli.

Afterwards, having need of a change of air, the Prior at that time, who was his friend, sent him away to a monastery of his Order, wherein, while he stayed there, he combined the labour of his hands with the contemplation of death, with profit[16] both for his soul and for the convent. For S. Martino in Lucca he painted a panel wherein, at the feet of a Madonna, there is a little angel playing on a lute, together with S. Stephen and S. John; in which picture, executed with excellent draughtsmanship and colouring, he proved his ability. For S. Romano, likewise, he painted a panel on canvas of the Madonna della Misericordia, who is placed on a pedestal of stone, with some angels holding her mantle; and together [Pg 160] with her he depicted a throng of people on some steps, some standing, others seated, and others kneeling, but all gazing at a figure of Christ on high, who is sending down lightnings and thunderbolts upon the people. Clearly did Fra Bartolommeo prove in this work how well he was able to manage the gradation of shadows and darks in painting, giving extraordinary relief to his figures, and showing a rare and excellent mastery over the difficulties of his art in colouring, drawing, and invention; and the work is as perfect as any that he ever made. For the same church he painted another panel, also on canvas, containing a Christ and S. Catherine the Martyr, together with a S. Catherine of Siena, rapt in ecstasy from the earth, a figure as good as any that could possibly be painted in that manner.

Afterwards, needing a change of scenery, the Prior, who was his friend at the time, sent him to a monastery of his Order. While he stayed there, he balanced manual labor with reflecting on death, benefiting both his soul and the convent. He painted a panel for S. Martino in Lucca, featuring a little angel playing a lute at the feet of a Madonna, along with S. Stephen and S. John. In this artwork, created with excellent skill and color use, he showcased his talent. For S. Romano, he also painted a canvas of the Madonna della Misericordia, who is on a stone pedestal with angels holding her mantle. Alongside her, he depicted a crowd of people on some steps—some standing, some sitting, and others kneeling—all looking up at a figure of Christ above, sending down lightning and thunderbolts upon them. Fra Bartolommeo clearly demonstrated his ability to manage shadows and dark tones in this piece, giving incredible relief to his figures and showing rare mastery over the challenges of coloring, drawing, and creativity; this work is as perfect as any he ever created. For the same church, he painted another canvas featuring Christ and S. Catherine the Martyr, along with S. Catherine of Siena, who is depicted in ecstasy, lifted from the earth—a figure as remarkable as any that could be painted in that style.

God The Father, with Ss. Mary Magdalen and Catharine.

GOD THE FATHER, WITH SS. MARY MAGDALEN AND CATHARINE
(After the painting by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Lucca: Gallery, 12)
Alinari
View larger image

GOD THE FATHER, WITH SAINTS MARY MAGDALEN AND CATHARINE
(After the painting by Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco.
Lucca: Gallery, 12)
Alinari
View larger image

Returning to Florence, he gave some attention to the study of music; and, delighting much therein, he would sometimes sing to pass the time. At Prato, opposite to the prison, he painted a panel-picture of the Assumption. He executed some pictures of Our Lady for the house of the Medici, and also other paintings for various people, such as a picture of Our Lady which Lodovico di Lodovico Capponi has in his apartment, and likewise another of the Virgin holding the Child in her arms, with two heads of saints, that is in the possession of the very Excellent Messer Lelio Torelli, Chief Secretary to the most Illustrious Duke Cosimo, who holds it very dear both on account of the genius of Fra Bartolommeo, and because he delights in, loves, and favours not only the men of our art, but every fine intellect. In the house of Piero del Pugliese, which now belongs to Matteo Botti, a citizen and merchant of Florence, in an antechamber at the head of a staircase, he painted a S. George in armour, on horseback, who is slaying the Dragon with his lance—a very spirited figure. This he executed in chiaroscuro, in oils, a method that he much delighted to use for all his works, sketching them in the manner of a cartoon, with ink or with bitumen, before colouring them; as may still be seen from many beginnings of pictures and panels, which he left unfinished on account of his death, and as may also be perceived from many drawings by his hand, executed in chiaroscuro, of which the greater part are now in the Monastery of S. Caterina da Siena on the [Pg 161] Piazza di S. Marco, in the possession of a nun who paints, and of whom record will be made in the proper place; while many made in the same way adorn our book of drawings, honouring his memory, and some are in the hands of Messer Francesco del Garbo, a most excellent physician.

Returning to Florence, he focused on studying music; enjoying it greatly, he would sometimes sing to pass the time. At Prato, across from the prison, he painted a panel picture of the Assumption. He created some paintings of Our Lady for the Medici family and other works for various people, like a painting of Our Lady that Lodovico di Lodovico Capponi has in his apartment, and another of the Virgin holding the Child in her arms, which belongs to the very Excellent Messer Lelio Torelli, Chief Secretary to the most Illustrious Duke Cosimo. He treasures it not only for Fra Bartolommeo's talent but also because he appreciates, loves, and supports not just artists, but all great minds. In the house of Piero del Pugliese, which now belongs to Matteo Botti, a citizen and merchant of Florence, he painted a St. George in armor, on horseback, slaying the Dragon with his lance—a very dynamic figure. He executed this in chiaroscuro, in oils, a technique he loved to use for all his works, sketching them like cartoons with ink or bitumen before adding color; as can still be seen from many unfinished pictures and panels he left behind due to his death, as well as from many drawings by his hand, created in chiaroscuro. Most of these are now at the Monastery of S. Caterina da Siena on the [Pg 161] Piazza di S. Marco, in the possession of a nun who paints, and of whom record will be made in the appropriate place. Meanwhile, many works done in the same style decorate our collection of drawings, honoring his memory, and some are with Messer Francesco del Garbo, an outstanding physician.

Fra Bartolommeo always liked to have living objects before him when he was working; and in order to be able to draw draperies, armour, and other suchlike things, he caused a life-size figure of wood to be made, which moved at the joints; and this he clothed with real draperies, from which he painted most beautiful things, being able to keep them in position as long as he pleased, until he had brought his work to perfection. This figure, worm-eaten and ruined as it is, is in our possession, treasured in memory of him.

Fra Bartolommeo always preferred to have live models in front of him while he worked. To help him draw fabrics, armor, and other similar items, he had a life-size wooden figure made that could move at the joints. He dressed this figure in actual fabrics, allowing him to paint stunning works while keeping everything in place for as long as he needed to perfect his art. This figure, even though it's now deteriorated and damaged, is still in our possession, cherished as a tribute to him.

At Arezzo, for the Abbey of the Black Friars, he made a head of Christ in dark tints—a very beautiful work. He painted, also, the panel of the Company of the Contemplanti, which was preserved in the house of the Magnificent Messer Ottaviano de' Medici, and has now been placed in a chapel of that house, with many ornaments, by his son Messer Alessandro, who holds it very dear in memory of Fra Bartolommeo, and also because he takes vast pleasure in painting. In the chapel of the Noviciate of S. Marco there is a panel-picture of the Purification, very lovely, which he executed with good draughtsmanship and high finish. At S. Maria Maddalena, a seat of the Friars of his Order, without Florence, while staying there for his own pleasure, he made a Christ and a Magdalene; and he also painted certain things in fresco in that convent. In like manner, he wrought in fresco an arch over the strangers' apartment in S. Marco, in which he painted Christ with Cleophas and Luke, and made a portrait of Fra Niccolò della Magna, who was then a young man, and who afterwards became Archbishop of Capua, and finally a Cardinal. He began a panel for S. Gallo, afterwards finished by Giuliano Bugiardini, which is now on the high-altar of S. Jacopo fra Fossi, on the Canto degli Alberti; and likewise a picture of the Rape of Dinah, now in the possession of Messer Cristofano Rinieri, and afterwards coloured by the same Giuliano, in which are buildings and conceptions that are much extolled.

At Arezzo, for the Abbey of the Black Friars, he created a depiction of Christ in dark tones—a truly beautiful work. He also painted the panel for the Company of the Contemplanti, which was kept in the home of the esteemed Messer Ottaviano de' Medici, and has now been placed in a chapel of that house, adorned with many ornaments, by his son Messer Alessandro, who treasures it in memory of Fra Bartolommeo and because he greatly enjoys painting. In the chapel of the Novitiate of S. Marco, there is a stunning panel painting of the Purification, which he executed with excellent skill and a high level of detail. At S. Maria Maddalena, a friary of his Order, just outside Florence, while he was there for his own enjoyment, he created a work featuring Christ and Magdalene; he also painted several frescoes in that convent. Similarly, he painted a fresco above the guests' quarters in S. Marco, depicting Christ with Cleophas and Luke, and made a portrait of Fra Niccolò della Magna, who was then a young man, later becoming the Archbishop of Capua and eventually a Cardinal. He began a panel for S. Gallo, which was later completed by Giuliano Bugiardini, now displayed on the high altar of S. Jacopo fra Fossi, located on the Canto degli Alberti; he also worked on a painting of the Rape of Dinah, now owned by Messer Cristofano Rinieri, which was later colored by the same Giuliano, featuring architecture and designs highly praised.

[Pg 162] From Piero Soderini he received the commission for the panel of the Council Chamber, which he began in such a manner, drawing it in chiaroscuro, that it seemed destined to do him very great credit; and, unfinished as it is, it now has a place of honour in the Chapel of the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, in S. Lorenzo. In it are all the Patron Saints of the city of Florence, and those saints on whose days that city has gained her victories; and there is also the portrait of Fra Bartolommeo himself, made by him with a mirror. He had begun this picture, and had drawn the whole design, when it happened that, from working continually under a window, with the light from it beating on his back, he became completely paralyzed on that side of his body, and quite unable to move. Thereupon he was advised—such being the orders of his physicians—to go to the baths of San Filippo; where he stayed a long time, but became very little better thereby. Now Fra Bartolommeo was a great lover of fruit, which pleased his palate mightily, although it was ruinous to his health. Wherefore one morning, having eaten many figs, there came upon him, in addition to his other infirmity, a very violent fever, which cut short the course of his life in four days, at the age of forty-eight; when, still wholly conscious, he rendered up his soul to Heaven.

[Pg 162] He received the commission for the panel of the Council Chamber from Piero Soderini. He started it in such a way, using chiaroscuro, that it seemed destined to earn him great acclaim. Although it remains unfinished, it currently holds a place of honor in the Chapel of the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici at S. Lorenzo. The artwork features all the Patron Saints of Florence and those saints whose feast days have coincided with the city's victories. It also includes a self-portrait of Fra Bartolommeo, created using a mirror. He had completed the entire design when, due to working constantly under a window with the light shining on his back, he became completely paralyzed on that side of his body and was unable to move. Following this, his doctors advised him to go to the baths of San Filippo; he stayed there for a long time but saw little improvement. Fra Bartolommeo loved fruit, which he enjoyed greatly, though it was detrimental to his health. One morning, after eating many figs, he developed a severe fever on top of his other health issues, which ultimately ended his life in four days, at the age of forty-eight. Even as he was passing, he remained fully conscious and surrendered his soul to Heaven.

His death grieved his friends, and particularly the friars, who gave him honourable sepulture in their burial-place in S. Marco, on October 8, in the year 1517. He had a dispensation from attending any of the offices in the choir with the other friars, and the gains from his works went to the convent, enough money being left in his hands to pay for colours and other materials necessary for his painting.

His death saddened his friends, especially the friars, who honored him with a proper burial in their resting place at St. Mark's on October 8, 1517. He had an exemption from participating in the choir services with the other friars, and the proceeds from his works went to the convent, leaving him enough money to buy paints and other materials he needed for his artwork.

He left disciples in Cecchino del Frate, Benedetto Cianfanini, Gabriele Rustici, and Fra Paolo Pistoiese, the latter inheriting all his possessions. This Fra Paolo painted many panels and pictures from his master's drawings, after his death; of which three are in S. Domenico at Pistoia, and one at S. Maria del Sasso in the Casentino.

He left followers in Cecchino del Frate, Benedetto Cianfanini, Gabriele Rustici, and Fra Paolo Pistoiese, with the latter inheriting all his belongings. After his death, Fra Paolo painted many panels and pictures based on his master's drawings; three are in S. Domenico at Pistoia, and one is at S. Maria del Sasso in the Casentino.

Fra Bartolommeo gave such grace to his figures with his colouring, and made them so novel and so modern in manner, that for these reasons he deserves to be numbered by us among the benefactors of art.

Fra Bartolommeo gave such elegance to his figures with his coloring, and made them so innovative and contemporary in style, that for these reasons he deserves to be counted among the benefactors of art.


[Pg 163] MARIOTTO ALBERTINELLI


[Pg 165] LIFE OF MARIOTTO ALBERTINELLI

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

Mariotto Albertinelli, the closest and most intimate friend of Fra Bartolommeo—his other self, one might call him, not only on account of the constant connection and intercourse between them, but also through their similarity of manner during the period when Mariotto gave proper attention to art—was the son of Biagio di Bindo Albertinelli. At the age of twenty he abandoned his calling of gold-beater, in which he had been employed up to that time; and he learnt the first rudiments of painting in the workshop of Cosimo Rosselli, where he formed such an intimacy with Baccio della Porta, that they were one soul and one body. Such, indeed, was the brotherly friendship between them, that when Baccio took his leave of Cosimo, in order to practise his art as a master by himself, Mariotto went off with him; whereupon they lived for a long time, both one and the other, at the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini, executing many works in company. And since Mariotto was not so well grounded in drawing as was Baccio, he devoted himself to the study of such antiquities as were then in Florence, the greater part and the best of which were in the house of the Medici. He made a number of drawings of certain little panels in half-relief that were under the loggia in the garden, on the side towards S. Lorenzo, in one of which is Adonis with a very beautiful dog, and in another two nude figures, one seated, with a dog at its feet, and the other standing with the legs crossed, leaning on a staff. Both these panels are marvellous; and there are likewise two others of the same size, in one of which are two little boys carrying Jove's thunderbolt, while in the other is the nude figure of an old man, with wings on his shoulders and feet, representing Chance, and balancing [Pg 166] a pair of scales in his hands. In addition to these works, that garden was full of torsi of men and women, which were a school not only for Mariotto, but for all the sculptors and painters of his time. A good part of these are now in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo, and others, such as the two torsi of Marsyas, the heads over the windows, and those of the Emperors over the doors, are still in the same place.

Mariotto Albertinelli, Fra Bartolommeo’s closest and most personal friend—one might even say his other half—not only because of their constant connection and interaction, but also due to their similar styles during the time when Mariotto focused on art, was the son of Biagio di Bindo Albertinelli. At the age of twenty, he left his job as a gold-beater, which he had held until then, and began learning the basics of painting in Cosimo Rosselli's workshop. There, he became so close with Baccio della Porta that they felt like one person. Their brotherly bond was so strong that when Baccio decided to leave Cosimo to pursue his own art, Mariotto went along with him. They lived together for a long time at Porta a S. Piero Gattolini, creating many artworks together. Since Mariotto wasn't as skilled in drawing as Baccio, he dedicated himself to studying the ancient sculptures that were available in Florence, most of which were housed in the Medici residence. He made several drawings of small relief panels located under the loggia in the garden, facing S. Lorenzo, where one features Adonis with a beautiful dog, and another depicts two nude figures—one seated with a dog at its feet, and the other standing with legs crossed and leaning on a staff. Both panels are stunning; there are also two others of the same size, one showing two boys carrying Jupiter's thunderbolt, and the other presenting the nude figure of an elderly man with wings on his shoulders and feet, symbolizing Chance, balancing a pair of scales in his hands. Additionally, that garden was filled with torsos of men and women, serving as a school not just for Mariotto, but for all sculptors and painters of his era. Many of these pieces are now in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo, while others, like the two torsos of Marsyas and the heads above the windows and doors of the Emperors, remain in the same location.

By studying these antiquities, Mariotto made great proficience in drawing; and he entered into the service of the mother of Duke Lorenzo, Madonna Alfonsina, who, desiring that he should devote himself to becoming an able master, offered him all possible assistance. Dividing his time, therefore, between drawing and colouring, he became a passing good craftsman, as is proved by some pictures that he executed for that lady, which were sent by her to Rome, for Carlo and Giordano Orsini, and which afterwards came into the hands of Cæsar Borgia. He made a very good portrait of Madonna Alfonsina from the life; and it seemed to him, on account of his friendship with her, that his fortune was made, when, in the year 1494, Piero de' Medici was banished, and her assistance and favour failed him. Whereupon he returned to the workshop of Baccio, where he set himself with even greater zeal to make models of clay and to increase his knowledge, labouring at the study of nature, and imitating the works of Baccio, so that in a few years he became a sound and practised master. And then, seeing his work succeeding so well, he so grew in courage, that, imitating the manner and method of his companion, the hand of Mariotto was taken by many for that of Fra Bartolommeo.

By studying these ancient artifacts, Mariotto greatly improved his drawing skills, and he started working for the mother of Duke Lorenzo, Madonna Alfonsina, who wanted him to become a skilled master and offered him all the help she could. He balanced his time between drawing and coloring, becoming quite a good craftsman, as shown by some paintings he did for her that were sent to Rome for Carlo and Giordano Orsini, which later ended up in the hands of Cæsar Borgia. He created a very good portrait of Madonna Alfonsina from life, and because of his friendship with her, he felt like he was on the path to success. However, in 1494, when Piero de' Medici was exiled and her support dwindled, he returned to Baccio's workshop and focused even more intently on making clay models and expanding his knowledge, studying nature and imitating Baccio's work. In just a few years, he became a skilled and experienced master. As his work continued to do well, he grew more confident, and many people began to mistake Mariotto's style for that of Fra Bartolommeo.

The Madonna enthroned, with Saints.

THE MADONNA ENTHRONED, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Mariotto Albertinelli.
Florence: Accademia, 167)
Alinari
View larger image

THE MADONNA ENTHRONED, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Mariotto Albertinelli.
Florence: Accademia, 167)
Alinari
View larger image

But when he heard that Baccio had gone off to become a monk, Mariotto was almost overwhelmed and out of his mind; and so strange did the news seem to him, that he was in despair, and nothing could cheer him. If it had not been, indeed, that Mariotto could not then endure having anything to do with monks, against whom he was ever railing, and belonged to the party that was opposed to the faction of Fra Girolamo of Ferrara, his love for Baccio would have wrought upon him so strongly, that it would have forced him to don the cowl in the same convent as his companion. However, he was besought by Gerozzo [Pg 167] Dini, who had given the commission for the Judgment that Baccio had left unfinished in the Ossa, that he, having a manner similar to Baccio's, should undertake to finish it; whereupon, being also moved by the circumstance that the cartoon completed by the hand of Baccio and other drawings were there, and by the entreaties of Fra Bartolommeo himself, who had received money on account of the painting, and was troubled in conscience at not having kept his promise, he finished the work, and executed all that was wanting with diligence and love, in such a way that many, not knowing this, think that it was painted by one single hand; and this brought him vast credit among craftsmen.

But when he heard that Baccio had gone off to become a monk, Mariotto was almost beside himself; the news seemed so strange to him that he fell into despair, and nothing could lift his spirits. If it weren't for the fact that Mariotto could not stand being around monks, whom he always criticized, and that he was part of the group opposing Fra Girolamo of Ferrara, his love for Baccio would have compelled him to join the same convent as his companion. However, he was urged by Gerozzo Dini, who had commissioned the Judgment that Baccio left unfinished in the Ossa, to take on the task of completing it since he had a style similar to Baccio's. Additionally, moved by the fact that the cartoon done by Baccio and other drawings were there, as well as by the pleas of Fra Bartolommeo, who had received funds for the painting and felt guilty about not fulfilling his promise, he finished the work, diligently and with love, in such a way that many, not knowing the truth, believe it was painted by a single artist; this earned him great respect among his peers.

In the Chapter-house of the Certosa of Florence he executed a Crucifixion, with Our Lady and the Magdalene at the foot of the Cross, and some angels in the sky, who are receiving the blood of Christ; a work wrought in fresco, with diligence and lovingness, and passing well painted. Now some of the young men who were learning art under him, thinking that the friars were not giving them proper food, had counterfeited, without the knowledge of Mariotto, the keys of those windows opening into the friar's rooms, through which their pittance is passed; and sometimes, in secret, they stole some of it, now from one and now from another. There was a great uproar about this among the friars, since in the matter of eating they are as sensitive as any other person; but the lads did it with great dexterity, and, since they were held to be honest fellows, the blame fell on some of the friars, who were said to be doing it from hatred of one another. However, one day the truth was revealed, and the friars, to the end that the work might be finished, gave a double allowance to Mariotto and his lads, who finished the work with great glee and laughter.

In the Chapter-house of the Certosa of Florence, he painted a Crucifixion scene, with Our Lady and Mary Magdalene at the foot of the Cross, and some angels in the sky receiving Christ's blood; a work done in fresco, with care and affection, and beautifully executed. Some of the young men learning art from him, thinking the friars weren’t providing enough food, had secretly faked the keys to the windows into the friar's rooms, through which their rations are passed; and occasionally, they stole some food, taking from one friar and then another. This caused quite a stir among the friars, since they are just as sensitive when it comes to eating as anyone else; but the guys pulled it off skillfully, and because they were seen as good guys, the blame shifted to some of the friars, who were accused of acting out of spite toward one another. However, one day the truth came out, and the friars, wanting the work to be completed, gave Mariotto and his young artists double rations, allowing them to finish the job with great joy and laughter.

For the Nuns of S. Giuliano in Florence he painted the panel of their high-altar, which he executed in a room that he had in the Gualfonda; together with another for the same church, with a Crucifix, some Angels, and God the Father, representing the Trinity, in oils and on a gold ground.

For the nuns of S. Giuliano in Florence, he created the panel for their high altar, which he worked on in a room he had in the Gualfonda. He also painted another piece for the same church featuring a Crucifix, some angels, and God the Father, representing the Trinity, in oils on a gold background.

Mariotto was a most restless person, devoted to the pleasures of love, and a good liver in the matter of eating; wherefore, conceiving a hatred [Pg 168] for the subtleties and brain-rackings of painting, and being often wounded by the tongues of other painters (according to the undying custom among them, handed down from one to another), he resolved to turn to a more humble, less fatiguing, and more cheerful art. And so, having opened a very fine inn, without the Porta S. Gallo, and a tavern and inn on the Ponte Vecchio, at the Dragon, he followed that calling for many months, saying that he had chosen an art without foreshortenings, muscles, and perspectives, and, what was much more important, free from censure, and that the art which he had given up was quite the contrary of his new one, since the former imitated flesh and blood, and the latter made both blood and flesh; and now, having good wine, he heard himself praised all day long, whereas before he used to hear nothing but censure.

Mariotto was a very restless person, devoted to the pleasures of love and a good eater. Because of this, he developed a hatred for the complexities and mental strain of painting, and often felt hurt by the comments of other painters (following the long-standing tradition among them). He decided to switch to a more humble, less exhausting, and more enjoyable art form. So, after opening a very nice inn outside Porta S. Gallo, as well as a tavern on the Ponte Vecchio called the Dragon, he pursued that path for many months, claiming he had chosen an art that didn’t involve foreshortening, muscles, and perspectives, and, more importantly, was free from criticism. He argued that the art he had given up was completely the opposite of his new one, since the former imitated flesh and blood, while the latter created both. Now, with good wine, he heard compliments all day long, whereas before he only received criticism.

The Salutation.

MARIOTTO ALBERTINELLI: THE SALUTATION
(Florence: Uffizi, 1259. Panel)
View larger image

MARIOTTO ALBERTINELLI: THE SALUTATION
(Florence: Uffizi, 1259. Panel)
View larger image

However, having grown weary of this as well, and ashamed of the baseness of his calling, he returned to painting, and executed pictures and paintings for the houses of citizens in Florence. For Giovan Maria Benintendi he painted three little scenes with his own hand; and for the house of the Medici, at the election of Leo X, he painted a round picture of his arms, in oils, with Faith, Hope, and Charity, which hung for a long time over the door of their palace. He undertook to make, in the Company of S. Zanobi, near the Chapter-house of S. Maria del Fiore, a panel-picture of the Annunciation, which he executed with great labour. For this he caused special windows to be made, wishing to work on the spot, in order to be able to make the views recede, where they were high and distant, by lowering the tones, or to bring them forward, at his pleasure. Now he had conceived the idea that pictures which have no relief and force, combined with delicacy, are of no account; but since he knew that they cannot be made to stand out from the surface without shadows, which, if they are too dark, remain indistinct, while, if they are delicate, they have no force, he was eager to combine this delicacy with a certain method of treatment to which up to that time, so it seemed to him, art had not attained in any satisfactory manner. Wherefore, looking on this work as an opportunity for accomplishing this, he set himself, to this end, to make extraordinary efforts, which may be recognized in a [Pg 169] figure of God the Father, which is in the sky, and in some little children, who stand out from the panel in strong relief against a dark background in perspective that he made there with a ceiling in the form of a barrel-shaped vault, which, with its arches curving and its lines diminishing to a point, recedes inwards in such a manner that it appears to be in relief; besides which, there are some angels scattering flowers as they fly, that are very graceful.

However, having grown tired of this as well, and feeling ashamed of the lowliness of his job, he returned to painting and created artworks for the homes of citizens in Florence. For Giovan Maria Benintendi, he painted three small scenes by himself; and for the Medici family, during the election of Leo X, he painted a round image of their crest, depicting Faith, Hope, and Charity, which hung for a long time over the door of their palace. He took on the task of making a panel painting of the Annunciation for the Company of S. Zanobi, near the Chapter-house of S. Maria del Fiore, which he worked on with great effort. For this, he had special windows made, wanting to work on-site so he could adjust the views based on how high and distant they were by softening the tones or bringing them closer at will. He believed that pictures lacking relief and strength, even if delicate, were worthless; but since he knew they couldn't stand out without shadows—too dark shadows making them unclear, while too light shadows lacking strength—he aimed to blend this delicacy with a technique that, until then, he felt art had not fully achieved. Therefore, seeing this work as a chance to accomplish this, he dedicated himself to remarkable efforts, which are evident in a figure of God the Father in the sky, along with some little children, who appear to pop out from the panel in strong relief against a dark background, which he created with a barrel-shaped vault ceiling that curves and recedes with diminishing lines to create the illusion of depth; additionally, there are some angels flying and scattering flowers that look very graceful.

This work was painted out and painted in again many times by Mariotto before he could bring it to completion. He was for ever changing the colouring, making it now lighter, now darker, and sometimes more lively and glowing, sometimes less; but, never being completely satisfied, and never persuaded that he had done justice with his hand to the thoughts of his intellect, he wished to find a white that should be more brilliant than lead-white, and set himself, therefore, to clarify the latter, in order to be able to heighten the highest light to his own satisfaction. However, having recognized that he was not able to express by means of art all that the intelligence of the human brain grasps and comprehends, he contented himself with what he had achieved, since he could not attain to what it was not possible to reach. This work brought Mariotto praise and honour among craftsmen, but by no means as much profit as he hoped to gain from his patrons in return for his labours, since a dispute arose between him and those who had commissioned him to paint it. But Pietro Perugino, then an old man, Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, and Francesco Granacci valued it, and settled the price of the work by common consent.

This artwork was repeatedly painted over and reworked by Mariotto before he could finish it. He was always altering the colors, making them lighter at times, darker at others, sometimes more vibrant and bright, sometimes more subdued. However, never feeling completely satisfied and convinced that he hadn't fully captured the ideas in his mind, he sought a white that would be brighter than lead-white and aimed to improve lead-white to create a higher light that met his standards. After realizing he couldn't express everything the human mind understands through art, he settled for what he had accomplished since he couldn't achieve the impossible. This piece earned Mariotto respect and recognition among fellow artists, but it didn't bring him the profit he expected from his patrons, as a disagreement arose between him and those who commissioned it. However, Pietro Perugino, who was then elderly, Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, and Francesco Granacci appreciated it and agreed on a price for the work.

For S. Pancrazio, in Florence, Mariotto painted a semicircular picture of the Visitation of Our Lady. For S. Trinità, likewise, he executed with diligence a panel-picture of Our Lady, S. Jerome, and S. Zanobi, at the commission of Zanobi del Maestro; and for the Church of the Congregation of the Priests of S. Martino, he painted a picture on panel of the Visitation, which is much extolled. He was invited to the Convent of La Quercia, without Viterbo; but after having begun a panel there, he conceived a desire to see Rome. Having made his way to that city, therefore, he executed to perfection for the Chapel of Fra Mariano [Pg 170] Fetti in S. Silvestro di Monte Cavallo, a panel-picture in oils of S. Dominic, S. Catherine of Siena, with Christ marrying her, and Our Lady, in a delicate manner. He then returned to La Quercia, where he had a mistress, to whom, on account of the desire that he had felt while he was in Rome and could not enjoy her love, he sought to show that he was valiant in the lists; wherefore he exerted himself so much, that, being no longer young and so stalwart in such efforts, he was forced to take to his bed. And laying the blame for this on the air of the place, he had himself carried to Florence in a litter; but no expedients or remedies availed him in his sickness, from which he died in a few days, at the age of forty-five. He was buried in S. Piero Maggiore, in that city.

For S. Pancrazio in Florence, Mariotto painted a semicircular artwork of the Visitation of Our Lady. For S. Trinità, he also diligently created a panel painting of Our Lady, S. Jerome, and S. Zanobi, commissioned by Zanobi del Maestro. Additionally, for the Church of the Congregation of the Priests of S. Martino, he painted a well-regarded panel depicting the Visitation. He was invited to the Convent of La Quercia, near Viterbo; however, after starting a panel there, he felt a strong urge to see Rome. So, he made his way to the city, where he skillfully created a panel painting in oils for the Chapel of Fra Mariano [Pg 170] Fetti in S. Silvestro di Monte Cavallo, featuring S. Dominic, S. Catherine of Siena—with Christ marrying her—and Our Lady, all depicted in a delicate style. He then returned to La Quercia, where he had a lover. Due to his desire for her while in Rome, which he couldn't satisfy, he wanted to prove his strength in love. He worked so hard that, no longer young and unable to handle such exertion, he collapsed into bed. Blaming his illness on the local air, he had himself carried back to Florence in a litter; however, no remedies helped his sickness, and he died a few days later at the age of forty-five. He was buried in S. Piero Maggiore in that city.

There are some drawings by the hand of this master in our book, executed with the pen and in chiaroscuro, which are very good; particularly a spiral staircase, drawn with great ingenuity in perspective, of which he had a good knowledge.

There are some drawings by this master in our book, done with a pen and in light and shadow, that are really impressive; especially a spiral staircase, drawn with great skill in perspective, which he understood very well.

Mariotto had many disciples; among others, Giuliano Bugiardini and Franciabigio, both Florentines, and Innocenzio da Imola, of whom we will speak in the proper place. Visino, a painter of Florence, was likewise his disciple, and excelled all these others in drawing, colouring, and industry, showing, also, a better manner in the works that he made, which he executed with great diligence. A few of them are still in Florence; and one can study his work at the present day in the house of Giovan Battista d' Agnol Doni, in a mirror[17]—picture painted in oils after the manner of a miniature, wherein are Adam and Eve naked, eating the apple, a work executed with great care; and from another picture, of Christ being taken down from the Cross, together with the Thieves, in which there is a beautifully contrived complication of ladders, with some men aiding each other to take down the body of Christ, and others bearing [Pg 171] one of the Thieves on their shoulders to burial, and all the figures in varied and fantastic attitudes, suited to that subject, and proving that he was an able man. The same master was brought by some Florentine merchants to Hungary, where he executed many works and gained great renown. But the poor man was soon in danger of coming to an evil end, because, being of a frank and free-spoken nature, he was not able to endure the wearisome persistence of some Hungarians, who kept tormenting him all day long with praises of their own country, as if there were no pleasure or happiness in anything except eating and drinking in their stifling rooms, and no grandeur or nobility save in their King and his Court, all the rest of the world being rubbish. It seemed to him (and indeed it is true) that in Italy there was another kind of excellence, culture, and beauty; and one day, being weary of their nonsense, and chancing to be a little merry, he let slip the opinion that a flask of Trebbiano and a berlingozzo[18] were worth all the Kings and Queens that had ever reigned in those regions. And if the matter had not happened to fall into the hands of a Bishop, who was a gentleman and a man of the world, and also, above all, a tactful person, both able and willing to turn the thing into a joke, Visino would have learnt not to play with savages; for those brutes of Hungarians, not understanding his words, and thinking that he had uttered something terrible, such as a threat that he would rob their King of his life and throne, wished to give him short shrift and crucify him by mob-law. But the good Bishop drew him out of all embarrassment, and, appraising the merit of the excellent master at its true value, and putting a good complexion on the affair, restored him to the favour of the King, who, on hearing the story, was much amused by it. His good fortune, however, did not last long, for, not being able to endure the stifling rooms and the cold air, which ruined his constitution, in a short time this brought his life to an end; although his repute and fame survived in the memory of those who knew him when alive, and of those who saw his works in the years after his death. His pictures date about the year 1512.

Mariotto had many students, including Giuliano Bugiardini and Franciabigio, both from Florence, and Innocenzio da Imola, who we'll mention later. Visino, a painter from Florence, was also his student and stood out among them in drawing, coloring, and dedication. He showed a better style in his works, which he completed with great care. A few of his pieces still exist in Florence; one can be examined today in the home of Giovan Battista d' Agnol Doni, featuring a mirror[17]—a picture painted in oils like a miniature, depicting Adam and Eve naked, eating the apple, made with great attention. Another work shows Christ being taken down from the Cross alongside the Thieves, showcasing a complicated arrangement of ladders, with men helping each other to lift Christ’s body, while others carry one of the Thieves on their shoulders for burial, all in varied and dynamic poses that fit the scene, proving his skill. This master was brought to Hungary by some Florentine merchants, where he completed many works and gained significant fame. However, he soon faced danger due to his frank and outspoken nature; he couldn’t tolerate the tiresome insistence of some Hungarians, who nagged him all day with praises of their country, as if pleasure and happiness were found only in their stifling rooms, with greatness lying solely in their King and his Court, while everything else was worthless. He believed (and it’s true) that Italy held a different kind of excellence, culture, and beauty. One day, tired of their nonsense and feeling a bit jovial, he blurted out that a flask of Trebbiano and a berlingozzo[18] were worth more than all the Kings and Queens that ever ruled there. If this hadn’t come to the attention of a Bishop, who was a gentleman and known for his tact, able and willing to turn the situation into a joke, Visino would have learned not to mess with the uncivilized; for those rough Hungarians, not understanding what he meant, thought he had made a terrible threat, like saying he would take the King’s life and throne, and wanted to punish him with mob justice. But the good Bishop saved him from embarrassment, recognizing the talent of the excellent master and smoothing over the situation, restoring him to the King’s favor, who found the story quite amusing. However, his good luck didn’t last long; unable to endure the stifling rooms and cold air, which harmed his health, he soon passed away. Nevertheless, his reputation and fame lived on in the memories of those who knew him during his life and those who saw his works after his death. His paintings date back to around the year 1512.


[Pg 173] RAFFAELLINO DEL GARBO


[Pg 175] LIFE OF RAFFAELLINO DEL GARBO

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

Raffaello del Garbo, while he was a little boy, was called by the pet name of Raffaellino, which he retained ever afterwards; and in his earliest days he gave such promise in his art, that he was already numbered among the most excellent masters, a thing which happens to few. But still fewer meet the fate which afterwards came upon him, in that from a splendid beginning and almost certain hopes, he arrived at a very feeble end. For it is a general rule, in the world both of nature and of art, for things to grow gradually from small beginnings, little by little, until they reach their highest perfection. It is true, however, that many laws both of art and of nature are unknown to us, nor do they hold to one unvarying order at all times and in every case, a thing which very often renders uncertain the judgments of men. How this may happen is seen in Raffaellino, since it appeared that in him nature and art did their utmost to set out from extraordinary beginnings, the middle stage of which was below mediocrity, and the end almost nothing.

Raffaello del Garbo, when he was a young boy, was affectionately called Raffaellino, a name he kept for life. Even in his early years, he showed such talent in his art that he was already recognized among the top masters, which is rare. However, even rarer is the fate he faced later on, going from a brilliant start and almost certain success to a very weak finish. It’s generally true that in both nature and art, things develop gradually from small beginnings, slowly improving until they reach their peak. However, many principles of art and nature are still unknown to us and don’t always follow a consistent pattern, which often leads to uncertainty in people's judgments. This is evident in Raffaellino’s case, as it seemed that nature and art both aimed for extraordinary beginnings, but his progress fell short of mediocrity, and his conclusion was almost nothing.

In his youth he drew as much as any painter who has ever exercised himself in drawing in order to become perfect; wherefore there may still be seen, throughout the world of art, a great number of his drawings, which have been dispersed by a son of his for ridiculous prices, partly drawn with the style, partly with the pen or in water-colours, but all on tinted paper, heightened with lead-white, and executed with marvellous boldness and mastery; and there are many of them in our book, drawn in a most beautiful manner. Besides this, he learnt to paint so well in distemper and in fresco, that his first works were executed with an incredible patience and diligence, as has been related.

In his youth, he drew as much as any painter ever has who dedicated themselves to mastering the craft. Because of this, there are still many of his drawings scattered across the art world, sold by his son at laughably low prices. These sketches were created in various styles, some with a brush, others with a pen or watercolors, but all on colored paper, enhanced with white lead, and made with incredible boldness and skill. Many of them can be found in our book, drawn in a beautifully intricate way. Additionally, he became very skilled at painting in tempera and fresco, with his early works showcasing remarkable patience and diligence, as has been noted.

[Pg 176] In the Minerva, round the tomb of Cardinal Caraffa, he painted the vaulted ceiling, with such delicacy, that it seems like the work of an illuminator; wherefore it was held in great estimation by craftsmen at that time. His master, Filippo, regarded him in some respects as a much better painter than himself; and Raffaellino had acquired Filippo's manner so well, that there were few who could distinguish the one from the other. Later, after having left his master, he gave much more delicacy to that manner in the draperies, and greater softness to hair and to the expressions of the heads; and he was held in such expectation by craftsmen, that, while he followed this manner, he was considered the first of the young painters of his day. Now the family of the Capponi, having built a chapel that is called the Paradiso, on the hill below the Church of S. Bartolommeo a Monte Oliveto, without the Porta a S. Friano, wished to have the panel executed by Raffaellino, and gave him the commission; whereupon he painted in oils the Resurrection of Christ, with some soldiers who have fallen, as if dead, round the Sepulchre. These figures are very spirited and beautiful, and they have the most graceful heads that it is possible to see; among which, in the head of a young man, is a marvellous portrait of Niccola Capponi, while, in like manner, the head of one who is crying out because the stone covering of the tomb has fallen upon him, is most beautiful and bizarre. Wherefore the Capponi, having seen that Raffaellino's picture was a rare work, caused a frame to be made for it, all carved, with round columns richly adorned with burnished gold on a ground of bole. Before many years had passed, the campanile of that building was struck by lightning, which pierced the vault and fell near that panel, which, having been executed in oils, suffered no harm; but where the fluid passed near the gilt frame, it consumed the gold, leaving nothing there but the bare bole. It has seemed to me right to say that much with regard to oil-painting, to the end that all may see how important it is to know how to guard against such injury, which lightning has done not only to this work, but to many others.

[Pg 176] In the Minerva, around the tomb of Cardinal Caraffa, he painted the vaulted ceiling with such finesse that it looks like the work of a manuscript illuminator; as a result, it was highly regarded by artisans of that time. His master, Filippo, considered him in many ways a superior painter; and Raffaellino adopted Filippo's style so well that few could tell them apart. Later, after leaving his master, he added even more refinement to that style in the drapery, as well as greater softness to hair and facial expressions. He was so well-regarded among craftsmen that during the time he maintained this style, he was deemed the top young painter of his generation. The Capponi family built a chapel known as the Paradiso, on the hill below the Church of S. Bartolommeo a Monte Oliveto, outside the Porta a S. Friano, and they commissioned Raffaellino for a painting. He created an oil painting of the Resurrection of Christ, depicting some soldiers who appear to have fallen dead around the tomb. These figures are vibrant and beautiful, featuring the most elegant heads imaginable; among them, the head of a young man is a remarkable portrait of Niccola Capponi, while another figure crying out because the tomb's stone has fallen on him is both stunning and striking. Seeing that Raffaellino's piece was exceptional, the Capponi family had a richly adorned carved frame made for it, with round columns beautifully decorated with burnished gold on a bole background. Within a few years, lightning struck the campanile of that building, piercing the vault and falling near that painting, which, being done in oils, was unharmed; however, the lightning burned off the gold from the gilded frame, leaving just the bare bole. I felt it necessary to mention this regarding oil painting so that everyone can understand the importance of protecting against such damage, which lightning has inflicted not only on this artwork but on many others as well.

The Resurrection.

THE RESURRECTION
(After the panel by Raffaellino del Garbo.
Florence: Accademia, 90)
Anderson
View larger image

THE RESURRECTION
(After the panel by Raffaellino del Garbo.
Florence: Accademia, 90)
Anderson
View larger image

He painted in fresco, at the corner of a house that now belongs to Matteo Botti, between the Canto del Ponte alla Carraja and the Canto [Pg 177] della Cuculia, a little shrine containing Our Lady with the Child in her arms, with S. Catherine and S. Barbara kneeling, a very graceful and carefully executed work. For the Villa of Marignolle, belonging to the Girolami, he painted two most beautiful panels, with Our Lady, S. Zanobi, and other saints; and he filled the predella below both of these with little figures representing scenes from the lives of those saints, executed with great diligence. On the wall above the door of the Church of the Nuns of S. Giorgio, he painted a Pietà, with a group of the Maries; and in like manner, in another arch below this, a figure of Our Lady, a work worthy of great praise, executed in the year 1504. In the Church of S. Spirito at Florence, in a panel over that of the Nerli, which his master Filippo had executed, he painted a Pietà, which is held to be a very good and praiseworthy work; but in another, representing S. Bernard, he fell short of that standard. Below the door of the sacristy are two panel-pictures by his hand; one showing S. Gregory the Pope saying Mass, when Christ appears to him, naked, with the Cross on His shoulder, and shedding blood from His side, with the deacon and sub-deacon, in their vestments, serving the Mass, and two angels swinging censers over the body of Christ. For another chapel, lower down, he executed a panel-picture containing Our Lady, S. Jerome, and S. Bartholomew. On these two works he bestowed no little labour; but he went on deteriorating from day to day. I do not know to what I should attribute his misfortune, for poor Raffaellino was not wanting in industry, diligence, and application; yet they availed him little. It is believed, indeed, that, becoming overburdened and impoverished by the cares of a family, and being compelled to use for his daily needs whatever he earned, not to mention that he was a man of no great spirit and undertook to do work for small prices, in this way he went on growing worse little by little; although there is always something of the good to be seen in his works.

He painted in fresco at the corner of a house now owned by Matteo Botti, between the Canto del Ponte alla Carraja and the Canto [Pg 177] della Cuculia, depicting a small shrine with Our Lady holding the Child, along with S. Catherine and S. Barbara kneeling. It's a very graceful and well-executed piece. For the Villa of Marignolle, owned by the Girolami family, he painted two beautiful panels featuring Our Lady, S. Zanobi, and other saints; he filled the predella below both with small figures showing scenes from the lives of those saints, done with great care. On the wall above the door of the Church of the Nuns of S. Giorgio, he painted a Pietà, along with a group of the Maries. Similarly, in another arch below this one, he depicted Our Lady, a work that deserves high praise, completed in 1504. In the Church of S. Spirito in Florence, on a panel above that of the Nerli, which his master Filippo had executed, he painted another Pietà that is considered very good and commendable; however, in another panel representing S. Bernard, he did not meet that standard. Below the door of the sacristy are two of his panel paintings; one shows S. Gregory the Pope celebrating Mass, where Christ appears to him, naked, with the Cross on His shoulder, and bleeding from His side, with the deacon and sub-deacon in their vestments assisting in the Mass, and two angels swinging censers over the body of Christ. For another chapel lower down, he painted a panel featuring Our Lady, S. Jerome, and S. Bartholomew. He put a lot of effort into these two works, but his condition continued to deteriorate day by day. I cannot say what caused his misfortune, as poor Raffaellino was certainly hard-working, diligent, and focused; yet, those qualities seemed to help him little. It is believed that he became overwhelmed and drained by family responsibilities, having to use all he earned for daily expenses, and being a man of modest means who took on work for low prices led to his gradual decline, although there is always some merit visible in his works.

For the Monks of Cestello, on the wall of their refectory, he painted a large scene coloured in fresco, in which he depicted the miracle wrought by Jesus Christ with the five loaves and two fishes, with which he satisfied five thousand people. For the Abbot de' Panichi he executed [Pg 178] the panel-picture of the high-altar in the Church of S. Salvi, without the Porta alla Croce, painting therein Our Lady, S. Giovanni Gualberto, S. Salvi, S. Bernardo, a Cardinal of the Uberti family, and S. Benedetto the Abbot, and, at the sides, S. Batista and S. Fedele in armour, in two niches on either hand of the picture, which had a rich frame; and in the predella are several scenes, with little figures, from the Life of S. Giovanni Gualberto. In all this he acquitted himself very well, because he was assisted in his wretchedness by that Abbot, who took pity on him for the sake of his talents; and in the predella of the panel Raffaellino made a portrait of him from life, together with one of the General who was then ruling his Order. In S. Piero Maggiore, on the right as one enters the church, there is a panel by his hand, and in the Murate there is a picture of S. Sigismund, the King. For Girolamo Federighi, in that part of S. Pancrazio where he was afterwards buried, he painted a Trinity in fresco, with portraits of him and of his wife on their knees; and here he began to decline into pettiness of manner. He also made two figures in distemper for the Monks of Cestello, a S. Rocco and a S. Ignazio, which are in the Chapel of S. Sebastiano. And in a little chapel on the abutment of the Ponte Rubaconte, on the side towards the Mills, he painted a Madonna, a S. Laurence, and another saint.

For the Cestello Monks, he painted a large fresco on the wall of their dining hall, illustrating the miracle performed by Jesus Christ with five loaves and two fish, which fed five thousand people. For Abbot de' Panichi, he created [Pg 178] the altarpiece for the high altar in the Church of S. Salvi, located near the Porta alla Croce, featuring Our Lady, S. Giovanni Gualberto, S. Salvi, S. Bernardo, a Cardinal from the Uberti family, and S. Benedetto the Abbot. On the sides, there are S. Batista and S. Fedele in armor, positioned in two niches on either side of the painting, which had an ornate frame. The predella showcases several scenes with small figures depicting the Life of S. Giovanni Gualberto. He performed this work very well, as he was supported in his difficulties by the Abbot, who showed compassion for his talents. In the predella of the panel, Raffaellino created a lifelike portrait of the Abbot along with one of the General who was leading his Order at that time. In S. Piero Maggiore, to the right upon entering the church, there's a panel by his hand, and in the Murate, there's a painting of S. Sigismund, the King. For Girolamo Federighi, in the part of S. Pancrazio where he was later buried, he painted a fresco of the Trinity, including portraits of him and his wife kneeling; and it was here that his style began to show signs of diminishment. He also created two figures in distemper for the Cestello Monks, a S. Rocco and a S. Ignazio, which are located in the Chapel of S. Sebastiano. Additionally, in a small chapel on the support of the Ponte Rubaconte, on the side facing the Mills, he painted a Madonna, S. Laurence, and another saint.

In the end he was reduced to undertaking any work, however mean; and he was employed by certain nuns and other persons, who were embroidering a quantity of church vestments and hangings at that time, to make designs in chiaroscuro and ornamental borders containing saints and stories, for ridiculous prices. For although he had deteriorated, there sometimes issued from his hand most beautiful designs and fancies, as is proved by many drawings that were sold and dispersed after the death of those who used them for embroidery; of which there are many in the book of the illustrious hospital-director,[19] that show how able he was in draughtsmanship. This was the reason that many vestments, hangings, and ornaments, which are held to be very beautiful, were made for the churches of Florence and throughout the Florentine territory, and also for Cardinals and Bishops in Rome. At the present day this method [Pg 179] of embroidery, which was used by Paolo da Verona, the Florentine Galieno, and others like them, is almost lost, and another method, with wide stitches, has been introduced, which has neither the same beauty nor the same careful workmanship, and is much less durable than the other. Wherefore, in return for this benefit, although poverty caused him misery and hardship during his lifetime, he deserves to have honour and glory for his talents after his death.

In the end, he had to take on any job, no matter how lowly; he worked for some nuns and others who were embroidering a lot of church vestments and hangings at the time, creating designs in chiaroscuro and ornamental borders featuring saints and stories for laughably low prices. Even though he had deteriorated, he occasionally produced incredibly beautiful designs and ideas, as shown by many drawings that were sold and spread after the deaths of those who used them for embroidery; many of these are in the book of the distinguished hospital director,[19] which demonstrate his talent in drawing. This is why many vestments, hangings, and ornaments considered very beautiful were made for churches in Florence and throughout the Florentine region, as well as for Cardinals and Bishops in Rome. Today, the embroidery method used by Paolo da Verona, the Florentine Galieno, and others like them is almost forgotten, replaced by a method with wide stitches that lacks the same beauty and craftsmanship, and is much less durable. Therefore, despite the misery and hardship poverty brought him during his life, he deserves honor and recognition for his talents after his death.

And in truth Raffaellino was unfortunate in his connections, for he always mixed with poor and humble people, like a man who had sunk and become ashamed of himself, seeing that in his youth he had given such great promise, and now knew how distant he was from the extraordinary excellence of the works that he had made at that time. And thus, growing old, he fell away so much from his early standard, that his works no longer appeared to be by his hand; and forgetting his art more and more every day, he was reduced to painting, in addition to his usual panels and pictures, the meanest kinds of works. And he sank so low that everything was a torment to him, but above all his burdensome family of children, which turned all his ability in art into mere clumsiness. Wherefore, being overtaken by infirmities and impoverished, he finished his life in misery at the age of fifty-eight, and was buried in S. Simone, at Florence, by the Company of the Misericordia, in the year 1524.

And in reality, Raffaellino was unfortunate with his connections, as he always surrounded himself with poor and humble people, much like someone who had fallen and felt ashamed of themselves, knowing he had once had such great potential in his youth. Now, he recognized how far he had strayed from the extraordinary quality of the works he had created back then. As he grew older, he fell so far from his earlier standards that his works no longer seemed to be his own; and as he forgot his art more and more each day, he was left painting not only his usual panels and pictures but also the most trivial kinds of works. He sank so low that everything became a source of torment for him, especially his burdensome family of children, which turned all his artistic talent into simple clumsiness. Consequently, as he faced illness and poverty, he ended his life in misery at the age of fifty-eight and was buried in S. Simone, Florence, by the Company of the Misericordia, in the year 1524.

He left behind him many pupils who became able masters. One, who went in his boyhood to learn the rudiments of art from Raffaellino, was the Florentine painter Bronzino, who afterwards acquitted himself so well under the wing of Jacopo da Pontormo, another painter of Florence, that he has made as much proficience in the art as his master Jacopo. The portrait of Raffaellino was copied from a drawing that belonged to Bastiano da Monte Carlo, who was also his disciple, and who, for a man with no draughtsmanship, became a passing good master.

He left behind many students who became skilled masters. One of them, who went to learn the basics of art from Raffaellino as a boy, was the Florentine painter Bronzino. He excelled under the mentorship of Jacopo da Pontormo, another painter from Florence, and made great progress in the art just like his master Jacopo. The portrait of Raffaellino was based on a drawing that belonged to Bastiano da Monte Carlo, who was also his student and, despite lacking drawing skills, became a fairly good master.


[Pg 181] TORRIGIANO


[Pg 183] LIFE OF TORRIGIANO

SCULPTOR OF FLORENCE

Great is the power of anger in the soul of one who is seeking, with arrogance and pride, to gain a reputation for excellence in some profession, when he sees rising in the same art, at a time when he does not expect it, some unknown man of beautiful genius, who not only equals him, but in time surpasses him by a great measure. Of such persons, in truth, it may be said that there is no iron that they would not gnaw in their rage, nor any evil which they would not do if they were able, for it seems to them too grievous an affront in the eyes of the world, that children whom they saw born should have reached maturity almost in one bound from their cradles. They do not reflect that every day one may see the will of young men, spurred on by zeal in their tender years, and exercised by them in continual studies, rise to infinite heights; while the old, led by fear, pride, and ambition, lose the cunning of their hands, so that the better they think to work, the worse they do it, and where they believe that they are advancing, they are going backwards. Wherefore, out of envy, they never give credit to the young for the perfection of their works, however clearly they may see it, on account of the obstinacy that possesses them. And it is known from experience that when, in order to show what they can do, they exert themselves to the utmost of their power, they often produce works that are ridiculous and a mere laughing-stock. In truth, when craftsmen have reached the age when the eye is no longer steady and the hand trembles, their place, if they have saved the wherewithal to live, is to give advice to men who can work, for the reason that the arts of painting and sculpture call for a mind in every way vigorous and awake (as it is at the age when the blood [Pg 184] is boiling), full of burning desire, and a capital enemy of the pleasures of the world. And whoever is not temperate with regard to the delights of the world should shun the studies of any art or science whatsoever, seeing that such pleasures and study can never agree well together. Since, therefore, these arts involve so many burdens, few, indeed, are they who attain to the highest rank; and those who start with eagerness from the post are greater in number than those who run well in the race and win the prize.

The power of anger is strong in someone who, with arrogance and pride, is trying to build a reputation for excellence in their field, especially when they unexpectedly see an unknown person with remarkable talent rising in the same art, who not only matches them but eventually surpasses them by a significant margin. It can truly be said that there’s no limit to the extremes they would go to in their rage, nor any wrongdoing they wouldn’t commit if they could, as it feels to them like a grave insult in the eyes of the world that those they witnessed as infants have quickly matured from their cradles. They fail to realize that every day, we see young people, driven by passion in their formative years and engaged in constant study, reaching incredible heights; while older individuals, held back by fear, pride, and ambition, lose their skills, and the harder they try, the worse they perform—believing they’re progressing when they’re actually regressing. Because of envy, they never acknowledge the young for the excellence of their work, despite how clearly they can see it, due to the stubbornness that grips them. Experience shows that when they push themselves to showcase their abilities, they often produce work that ends up being ridiculous and laughable. Indeed, when craftsmen reach an age where their vision wavers and their hands tremble, their role, if they have saved enough to live on, should be to advise those who can still work, since the arts of painting and sculpture require a mind that is fully engaged and alert (like it is when the blood [Pg 184] is flowing), filled with intense passion, and fundamentally opposed to worldly pleasures. Anyone who cannot practice moderation regarding worldly delights should avoid studying any art or science at all, as such pleasures and study cannot coexist harmoniously. Therefore, since these arts come with many burdens, very few reach the highest levels; and those who set out with enthusiasm at the beginning are far more numerous than those who run the race well and win the prize.

Now there was more pride than art, although he was very able, to be seen in Torrigiano, a sculptor of Florence, who in his youth was maintained by the elder Lorenzo de' Medici in the garden which that magnificent citizen possessed on the Piazza di S. Marco in Florence. This garden was in such wise filled with the best ancient statuary, that the loggia, the walks, and all the apartments were adorned with noble ancient figures of marble, pictures, and other suchlike things, made by the hands of the best masters who ever lived in Italy or elsewhere. And all these works, in addition to the magnificence and adornment that they conferred on that garden, were as a school or academy for the young painters and sculptors, as well as for all others who were studying the arts of design, and particularly for the young nobles; since the Magnificent Lorenzo had a strong conviction that those who are born of noble blood can attain to perfection in all things more readily and more speedily than is possible, for the most part, for men of humble birth, in whom there are rarely seen those conceptions and that marvellous genius which are perceived in men of illustrious stock. Moreover, the less highly born, having generally to defend themselves from hardship and poverty, and being forced in consequence to undertake any sort of work, however mean, are not able to exercise their intellect, or to attain to the highest degree of excellence. Wherefore it was well said by the learned Alciato—when speaking of men of beautiful genius, born in poverty, who are not able to raise themselves, because, in proportion as they are impelled upwards by the wings of their genius, so are they held down by their poverty—

Now there was more pride than artistry, even though he was very talented, to be seen in Torrigiano, a sculptor from Florence, who in his youth was supported by the elder Lorenzo de' Medici in the garden that this magnificent citizen owned in the Piazza di S. Marco in Florence. This garden was filled with the finest ancient statues, making the loggia, the paths, and all the rooms adorned with noble ancient marble figures, paintings, and similar works created by the best masters who ever lived in Italy or elsewhere. All these works, alongside the magnificence and beauty they added to the garden, served as a school or academy for young painters and sculptors, as well as for anyone studying the arts of design, especially for the young nobles; because the Magnificent Lorenzo strongly believed that those born into noble families can achieve perfection in everything more easily and quickly than most men of humble backgrounds, who rarely demonstrate the ideas and remarkable genius found in those of esteemed lineage. Moreover, those of lower birth, generally needing to protect themselves from hardship and poverty, and being compelled to take on any sort of work, no matter how lowly, cannot exercise their intellect or reach the highest levels of excellence. Therefore, it was well said by the learned Alciato—when talking about men of great talent who are born into poverty, who cannot lift themselves up, because as much as their genius tries to elevate them, poverty keeps them grounded—

Ut me pluma levat, sic grave mergit onus.

Ut me pluma levat, sic grave mergit onus.

[Pg 185] Lorenzo the Magnificent, then, always favoured men of genius, and particularly such of the nobles as showed an inclination for these our arts; wherefore it is no marvel that from that school there should have issued some who have amazed the world. And what is more, he not only gave the means to buy food and clothing to those who, being poor, would otherwise not have been able to pursue the studies of design, but also bestowed extraordinary gifts on any one among them who had acquitted himself in some work better than the others; so that the young students of our arts, competing thus with each other, thereby became very excellent, as I will relate.

[Pg 185] Lorenzo the Magnificent always supported talented individuals, especially those among the nobility who showed a passion for our arts. So, it's no surprise that his school produced some who have amazed the world. Furthermore, he not only provided food and clothing for those who were poor and otherwise couldn't pursue their studies in design, but he also offered significant rewards to anyone who excelled in their work. As a result, the young students in our arts, competing with one another, became incredibly skilled, as I will explain.

The guardian and master of these young men, at that time, was the Florentine sculptor Bertoldo, an old and practised craftsman, who had once been a disciple of Donato. He taught them, and likewise had charge of the works in the garden, and of many drawings, cartoons, and models by the hand of Donato, Pippo,[20] Masaccio, Paolo Uccello, Fra Giovanni, Fra Filippo, and other masters, both native and foreign. It is a sure fact that these arts can only be acquired by a long course of study in drawing and diligently imitating works of excellence; and whoever has not such facilities, however much he may be assisted by nature, can never arrive at perfection, save late in life.

The guardian and master of these young men at that time was the Florentine sculptor Bertoldo, an experienced craftsman who had once been a student of Donato. He taught them and also oversaw the works in the garden, along with many drawings, sketches, and models created by Donato, Pippo,[20] Masaccio, Paolo Uccello, Fra Giovanni, Fra Filippo, and other masters, both local and foreign. It's a well-known fact that these arts can only be mastered through a long process of studying drawing and carefully imitating works of excellence; anyone without these resources, no matter how much natural talent they have, will never achieve perfection until much later in life.

But to return to the antiquities of the garden; they were in great part dispersed in the year 1494, when Piero, the son of the aforesaid Lorenzo, was banished from Florence, all being sold by auction. The greater part of them, however, were restored to the Magnificent Giuliano in the year 1512, at the time when he and the other members of the House of Medici returned to their country; and at the present day they are for the most part preserved in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo. Truly magnificent was the example thus given by Lorenzo, and whenever Princes and other persons of high degree choose to imitate it, they will always gain everlasting honour and glory thereby; since he who assists and favours, in their noble undertakings, men of rare and beautiful genius, from whom the world receives such beauty, honour, convenience and benefit, deserves to live for ever in the minds and memories of mankind.

But to get back to the old treasures of the garden; many of them were scattered in 1494 when Piero, the son of the aforementioned Lorenzo, was exiled from Florence, and all were sold at auction. Most of them, however, were returned to the Magnificent Giuliano in 1512, when he and the other members of the House of Medici came back to their homeland; and today, they are mostly kept in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo. Truly magnificent was the example set by Lorenzo, and whenever princes and other high-ranking individuals choose to follow it, they will always earn lasting honor and glory; because those who support and champion exceptional and talented individuals in their noble pursuits—who bring such beauty, honor, benefit, and convenience to the world—deserve to be remembered forever by mankind.

[Pg 186] Among those who studied the arts of design in that garden, the following all became very excellent masters; Michelagnolo, the son of Lodovico Buonarroti; Giovan Francesco Rustici; Torrigiano Torrigiani; Francesco Granacci; Niccolò, the son of Jacopo[21] Soggi; Lorenzo di Credi, and Giuliano Bugiardini; and, among the foreigners, Baccio da Montelupo, Andrea Contucci of Monte Sansovino, and others, of whom mention will be made in the proper places.

[Pg 186] Among those who learned design in that garden, the following all became exceptional masters: Michelangelo, the son of Lodovico Buonarroti; Giovan Francesco Rustici; Torrigiano Torrigiani; Francesco Granacci; Niccolò, the son of Jacopo Soggi; Lorenzo di Credi, and Giuliano Bugiardini; and, among the foreigners, Baccio da Montelupo, Andrea Contucci of Monte Sansovino, and others, who will be mentioned in the appropriate sections.

Torrigiano, then, whose Life we are now about to write, was a student in the garden with those named above; and he was not only powerful in person, and proud and fearless in spirit, but also by nature so overbearing and choleric, that he was for ever tyrannizing over all the others both with words and deeds. His chief profession was sculpture, yet he worked with great delicacy in terra-cotta, in a very good and beautiful manner. But not being able to endure that any one should surpass him, he would set himself to spoil with his hands such of the works of others as showed an excellence that he could not achieve with his brain; and if these others resented this, he often had recourse to something stronger than words. He had a particular hatred for Michelagnolo, for no other reason than that he saw him attending zealously to the study of art, and knew that he used to draw in secret at his own house by night and on feast-days, so that he came to succeed better in the garden than all the others, and was therefore much favoured by Lorenzo the Magnificent. Wherefore, moved by bitter envy, Torrigiano was always seeking to affront him, both in word and deed; and one day, having come to blows, Torrigiano struck Michelagnolo so hard on the nose with his fist, that he broke it, insomuch that Michelagnolo had his nose flattened for the rest of his life. This matter becoming known to Lorenzo, he was so enraged that Torrigiano, if he had not fled from Florence, would have suffered some heavy punishment.

Torrigiano, whose life we’re about to recount, was a student in the garden alongside the others mentioned above. He was not only physically strong and proud, but also naturally domineering and quick-tempered, often bullying everyone around him with both words and actions. His main focus was sculpture, and he worked skillfully with terra-cotta in a very fine and beautiful way. However, unable to tolerate anyone outdoing him, he frequently sabotaged the work of others that showed talent he couldn't match, and if they objected, he often resorted to violence. He had a particular dislike for Michelangelo, simply because he saw him dedicated to studying art and knew that Michelangelo would secretly draw at home by night and on holidays, allowing him to excel in the garden beyond the others, earning him much favor from Lorenzo the Magnificent. Driven by bitter jealousy, Torrigiano constantly tried to insult him, both verbally and physically; one day, they came to blows, and Torrigiano hit Michelangelo so hard on the nose that he broke it, leaving Michelangelo with a flattened nose for the rest of his life. When Lorenzo found out about this, he was so furious that Torrigiano, had he not fled Florence, would have faced severe punishment.

Tomb of Henry VII.

TOMB OF HENRY VII
(After Torrigiano.
London: Westminster Abbey)
Mansell
View larger image

TOMB OF HENRY VII
(After Torrigiano.
London: Westminster Abbey)
Mansell
View larger image

Having therefore made his way to Rome, where Alexander VI was then pressing on the work of the Borgia Tower, Torrigiano executed in it a great quantity of stucco-work, in company with other masters. Afterwards, money being offered in the service of Duke Valentino, who [Pg 187] was making war against the people of Romagna, Torrigiano was led away by certain young Florentines; and, having changed himself in a moment from a sculptor to a soldier, he bore himself valiantly in those campaigns of Romagna. He did the same under Paolo Vitelli in the war with Pisa; and he was with Piero de' Medici at the action on the Garigliano, where he won the right to arms, and the name of a valiant standard-bearer.

Having made his way to Rome, where Alexander VI was actively working on the Borgia Tower, Torrigiano completed a large amount of stucco work alongside other artists. Later, when money was offered for the service of Duke Valentino, who was waging war against the people of Romagna, Torrigiano was persuaded by some young Florentines to join them. In an instant, he transformed from a sculptor to a soldier, demonstrating bravery in those Romagna campaigns. He fought with Paolo Vitelli in the war against Pisa and was present with Piero de' Medici at the battle on the Garigliano, where he earned the title of valiant standard-bearer.

But in the end, recognizing that he was never likely to reach the rank of captain that he desired, although he deserved it, and that he had saved nothing in the wars, and had, on the contrary, wasted his time, he returned to sculpture. For certain Florentine merchants, then, he made small works in marble and bronze, little figures, which are scattered throughout the houses of citizens in Florence, and he executed many drawings in a bold and excellent manner, as may be seen from some by his hand that are in our book, together with others which he made in competition with Michelagnolo. And having been brought by those merchants to England, he executed there, in the service of the King, an endless number of works in marble, bronze, and wood, competing with some masters of that country, to all of whom he proved superior. For this he was so well and so richly rewarded, that, if he had not been as reckless and unbridled as he was proud, he might have lived a life of ease and ended his days in comfort; but what happened to him was the very opposite.

But in the end, realizing that he was never going to achieve the rank of captain he wanted, even though he deserved it, and that he hadn’t saved anything from the wars—instead, he had wasted his time—he went back to sculpture. For some Florentine merchants, he created small marble and bronze pieces, little figures that are now scattered throughout the homes of citizens in Florence. He also made many bold and excellent drawings, some of which are included in our book, along with others he created to compete with Michelangelo. After being brought to England by those merchants, he produced countless works in marble, bronze, and wood for the King, competing with some of the masters there, all of whom he surpassed. For this, he was rewarded so generously that if he hadn’t been as reckless and wild as he was proud, he could have lived a comfortable and easy life; instead, his fate was entirely the opposite.

After this, having been summoned from England into Spain, he made many works there, which are scattered about in various places, and are held in great estimation; and, among others, he made a Crucifix of terra-cotta, which is the most marvellous thing that there is in all Spain. For a monastery of Friars of S. Jerome, without the city of Seville, he made another Crucifix; a S. Jerome in Penitence, with his lion, the figure of that Saint being a portrait of an old house-steward of the Botti family, Florentine merchants settled in Spain; and a Madonna with the Child. This last figure was so beautiful that it led to his making another like it for the Duke of Arcus, who, in order to obtain it, made such promises to Torrigiano, that he believed that it would make him [Pg 188] rich for the rest of his life. The work being finished, the Duke gave him so many of those coins that are called "maravedis," which are worth little or nothing, that Torrigiano, to whose house there came two persons laden with them, became even more confirmed in his belief that he was to be a very rich man. But afterwards, having shown this money to a Florentine friend of his, and having asked him to count it and reckon its value in Italian coin, he saw that all that vast sum did not amount to thirty ducats; at which, holding himself to have been fooled, he went in a violent rage to where the figure was that he had made for the Duke, and wholly destroyed it. Whereupon that Spaniard, considering himself affronted, denounced Torrigiano as a heretic; on which account he was thrown into prison, and after being examined every day, and sent from one inquisitor to the other, he was finally judged to deserve the severest penalty. But this was never put into execution, because Torrigiano himself was plunged thereby into such melancholy, that, remaining many days without eating, and thus becoming very weak, little by little he put an end to his own life; and in this way, by denying himself his food, he avoided the shame into which he would perchance have fallen, for it was believed that he had been condemned to death.

After this, he was called from England to Spain, where he created many works that are spread across different locations and are highly valued. Among them, he made a terra-cotta Crucifix that is the most amazing thing in all of Spain. For a monastery of the Friars of St. Jerome, just outside Seville, he crafted another Crucifix, along with a St. Jerome in Penitence, featuring his lion. The figure of that Saint was modeled after an old house-steward of the Botti family, a group of Florentine merchants living in Spain, as well as a Madonna with the Child. This last figure was so stunning that it led him to create another one for the Duke of Arcus, who promised Torrigiano such rewards for it that he believed it would make him [Pg 188] rich for the rest of his life. When the work was completed, the Duke paid him with so many of those coins called "maravedis," which are nearly worthless, that when two people showed up at Torrigiano's house loaded with them, he became even more convinced he would be a very wealthy man. But later, after showing the money to a Florentine friend and asking him to count and convert it into Italian currency, he discovered that the entire amount was worth less than thirty ducats. Feeling cheated, he went into a furious rage and destroyed the figure he had made for the Duke. The Spaniard, feeling insulted, reported Torrigiano as a heretic. As a result, he was thrown into prison and was examined day after day, moved from one inquisitor to another, until he was ultimately judged to deserve the harshest punishment. However, this punishment was never carried out because Torrigiano fell into such deep despair that he went without eating for many days, becoming very weak, and gradually ended his own life. In this way, by refusing food, he avoided the shame he might have faced, as it was believed he had been sentenced to death.

The works of this master date about the year of our salvation, 1515, and he died in the year 1522.

The works of this master date back to around the year 1515, and he passed away in 1522.


[Pg 189] GIULIANO AND ANTONIO DA SAN GALLO


[Pg 191] LIVES OF GIULIANO AND ANTONIO DA SAN GALLO

ARCHITECTS OF FLORENCE

Francesco di Paolo Giamberti, who was a passing good architect in the time of Cosimo de' Medici, and was much employed by him, had two sons, Giuliano and Antonio, whom he apprenticed to the art of wood-carving. One of these two sons, Giuliano, he placed with Francione, a joiner, an ingenious person, who gave attention at the same time to wood-carving and to perspective, and with whom Francesco was very intimate, since they had executed many works in company, both in carving and in architecture, for Lorenzo de' Medici. This Giuliano learnt so well all that Francione taught him, that the carvings and beautiful perspectives that he afterwards executed by himself in the choir of the Duomo of Pisa are still regarded not without marvel at the present day, even among the many new perspectives.

Francesco di Paolo Giamberti, a skilled architect during the time of Cosimo de' Medici, who employed him frequently, had two sons, Giuliano and Antonio, whom he trained in wood-carving. He apprenticed Giuliano to Francione, a talented joiner who also focused on wood-carving and perspective. Francesco was close with Francione, as they had collaborated on many projects in both carving and architecture for Lorenzo de' Medici. Giuliano learned so well from Francione that the carvings and stunning perspectives he created later in the choir of the Duomo of Pisa are still admired today, even among many newer works.

While Giuliano was studying design, and his young blood ran hot in his veins, the army of the Duke of Calabria, by reason of the hatred which that lord bore to Lorenzo de' Medici, encamped before Castellina, in order to occupy the dominions of the Signoria of Florence, and also, if this should be successful, in order to accomplish some greater design. Wherefore Lorenzo the Magnificent was forced to send an engineer to Castellina, who might make mills and bastions, and should have the charge of handling the artillery, which few men at that time were able to do; and he sent thither Giuliano, considering him to have a mind more able, more ready, and more resolute than any other man, and knowing him already as the son of Francesco, who had been a devoted servant of the House of Medici.

While Giuliano was studying design and his youthful energy was strong, the army of the Duke of Calabria, fueled by the animosity that lord held towards Lorenzo de' Medici, camped outside Castellina. Their goal was to take over the territories of the Signoria of Florence and, if they succeeded, to pursue an even bigger plan. As a result, Lorenzo the Magnificent had to send an engineer to Castellina to construct mills and bastions and manage the artillery, which few men could handle at that time. He chose Giuliano for this task, believing him to be more capable, quicker, and more determined than anyone else, and already knowing him as the son of Francesco, who had been a loyal servant to the House of Medici.

Arriving at Castellina, therefore, Giuliano fortified that place with [Pg 192] good walls and mills, both within and without, and furnished it with everything else necessary for the defence. Then, observing that the artillery-men stood at a great distance from their pieces, handling, loading, and discharging them with much timidity, he gave his attention to this, and so contrived that from that time onwards the artillery did harm to no one, whereas it had previously killed many of them, since they had not had judgment and knowledge enough to avoid suffering injury from the recoil. Having therefore taken charge of the artillery, Giuliano showed great skill in discharging it to the best possible advantage; and the Duke's forces so lost heart by reason of this and other adverse circumstances, that they were glad to make terms and depart from the town. In consequence of this Giuliano won no little praise from Lorenzo in Florence, and was looked upon with favour and affection ever afterwards.

Arriving at Castellina, Giuliano strengthened the place with [Pg 192] solid walls and mills, both inside and out, and equipped it with everything necessary for defense. Noticing that the artillerymen were standing far away from their weapons, handling, loading, and firing them with a lot of hesitation, he focused on this issue and created a situation where, from then on, the artillery didn’t injure anyone, even though it had previously caused many casualties because they lacked the judgment and knowledge to avoid getting hurt by the recoil. Taking charge of the artillery, Giuliano demonstrated great skill in using it to its fullest advantage; the Duke's troops lost their morale due to this and other unfavorable circumstances, leading them to seek terms and leave the town. As a result, Giuliano received significant praise from Lorenzo in Florence and was regarded with favor and affection ever after.

Having meanwhile given his attention to architecture, he began the first cloister of the Monastery of Cestello, and executed that part of it that is seen to be of the Ionic Order; placing capitals on the columns with volutes curving downwards to the collarino, where the shaft of the column ends, and making, below the ovoli and the fusarole, a frieze, one-third in height of the diameter of the column. This capital was copied from a very ancient one of marble, found at Fiesole by Messer Leonardo Salutati, Bishop of that place, who kept it for some time, together with other antiquities, in a house and garden that he occupied in the Via di S. Gallo, opposite to S. Agata; and it is now in the possession of Messer Giovan Battista da Ricasoli, Bishop of Pistoia, and is prized for its beauty and variety, since among the ancient capitals there has not been seen another like it. But that cloister remained unfinished, because those monks were not then able to bear such an expense.

Having meanwhile focused on architecture, he started the first cloister of the Monastery of Cestello and completed the part that's in the Ionic Order. He placed capitals on the columns with scrolls curving downwards to the collarino, where the column shaft ends, and created a frieze below the ovoli and the fusarole, which is one-third the height of the column's diameter. This capital was modeled after a very ancient marble one found at Fiesole by Messer Leonardo Salutati, the Bishop there, who preserved it for a while, along with other artifacts, in his house and garden on Via di S. Gallo, across from S. Agata. It's now owned by Messer Giovan Battista da Ricasoli, the Bishop of Pistoia, and is valued for its beauty and uniqueness, as none of the ancient capitals are similar. However, that cloister remained unfinished because the monks couldn't afford such an expense at the time.

Meanwhile Giuliano had come into even greater credit with Lorenzo; and the latter, who was intending to build a palace at Poggio a Cajano, a place between Florence and Pistoia, and had caused several models to be made for it by Francione and by others, commissioned Giuliano, also, to make one of the sort of building that he proposed to erect. And Giuliano made it so completely different in form from the others, and so [Pg 193] much to Lorenzo's fancy, that he began straightway to have it carried into execution, as the best of all the models; on which account he took Giuliano even more into his favour, and ever afterwards gave him an allowance.

Meanwhile, Giuliano had gained even more favor with Lorenzo. The latter was planning to build a palace at Poggio a Cajano, a location between Florence and Pistoia, and had commissioned several models for it from Francione and others. He also asked Giuliano to create a model for the type of building he intended to construct. Giuliano designed it in such a unique style compared to the others and so much to Lorenzo's liking that he immediately moved forward with it as the best of all the models. As a result, he took Giuliano into his inner circle even more and started giving him an allowance.

After this, Giuliano wishing to make a vaulted ceiling for the great hall of that palace in the manner that we call barrel-shaped, Lorenzo could not believe, on account of the great space, that it could be raised. Whereupon Giuliano, who was building a house for himself in Florence, made a ceiling for his hall according to the design of the other, in order to convince the mind of that Magnificent Prince; and Lorenzo therefore gave orders for the ceiling at the Poggio to be carried out, which was successfully done.

After this, Giuliano wanted to create a vaulted ceiling for the great hall of that palace in what we now call a barrel shape. Lorenzo couldn't believe that it could be built because of the large space involved. So, Giuliano, who was constructing a house for himself in Florence, made a ceiling for his hall based on the design of the other, to persuade that Magnificent Prince. Lorenzo then instructed for the ceiling at the Poggio to be completed, which was successfully done.

By that time the fame of Giuliano had so increased, that, at the entreaty of the Duke of Calabria, he was commissioned by Lorenzo the Magnificent to make the model for a palace that was to be built at Naples; and he spent a long time over executing it. Now while he was working at this, the Castellan of Ostia, then Bishop della Rovere, who after a time became Pope Julius II, wishing to restore that stronghold and to put it into good order, and having heard the fame of Giuliano, sent to Florence for him; and, having supplied him with a good provision, he kept him employed for two years in making therein all the useful improvements that he was able to execute by means of his art. And to the end that the model for the Duke of Calabria might not be neglected, but might be brought to conclusion, he left it to his brother Antonio, who finished it according to his directions, which, in executing it and carrying it to completion, he followed with great diligence, for he was no less competent in that art than Giuliano himself. Now Giuliano was advised by the elder Lorenzo to present it in person, to the end that he might show from the model itself the difficulties that he had triumphed over in making it. Whereupon he departed for Naples, and, having presented the work, was received with honour; for men were as much impressed by the gracious manner in which the Magnificent Lorenzo had sent him, as they were struck with marvel at the masterly work in the model, which gave such satisfaction that the building was straightway begun near the Castel Nuovo.

By that time, Giuliano's fame had grown so much that, at the request of the Duke of Calabria, he was commissioned by Lorenzo the Magnificent to create a model for a palace to be built in Naples. He spent a long time working on it. While he was doing this, the Castellan of Ostia, who was then Bishop della Rovere and later became Pope Julius II, wanted to restore the stronghold and make improvements. Hearing about Giuliano's reputation, he sent for him in Florence. He provided Giuliano with plenty of resources and kept him busy for two years making various useful improvements in the fortress using his skills. To ensure that the model for the Duke of Calabria was not overlooked but completed, he entrusted it to his brother Antonio, who finished it according to Giuliano's instructions. Antonio followed these directions with great diligence and was just as skilled in that art as Giuliano was. Giuliano was advised by the older Lorenzo to present the model in person to showcase the challenges he had overcome while creating it. He then set off for Naples, and when he presented the work, he was received with great honor. People were as impressed by the gracious way Lorenzo had sent him as they were amazed by the masterful model, which was so well-received that construction on the building began immediately near the Castel Nuovo.

[Pg 194] After Giuliano had been some time in Naples, he sought leave from the Duke to return to Florence; whereupon he was presented by the King with horses and garments, and, among other things, with a silver cup containing some hundreds of ducats. These things Giuliano would not accept, saying that he served a patron who had no need of silver or gold, but that if he did indeed wish to give him some present or some token of approbation, to show that he had been in that city, he might bestow upon him some of his antiquities, which he would choose himself. These the King granted to him most liberally, both for love of the Magnificent Lorenzo and on account of Giuliano's own worth; and they were a head of the Emperor Hadrian, which is now above the door of the garden at the house of the Medici, a nude woman, more than life-size, and a Cupid sleeping, all in marble and in the round. Giuliano sent them as presents to the Magnificent Lorenzo, who expressed vast delight at the gift, and never tired of praising the action of this most liberal of craftsmen, who had refused gold and silver for the sake of art, a thing which few would have done. That Cupid is now in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo.

[Pg 194] After Giuliano spent some time in Naples, he asked the Duke for permission to return to Florence. In response, the King gifted him horses and clothes, along with a silver cup filled with hundreds of ducats. Giuliano declined these gifts, stating that he served a patron who didn't need silver or gold. Instead, he suggested that if the King wanted to give him something as a token of his appreciation for his time in the city, he could give him some of his antiquities, which he would select himself. The King generously agreed to this, out of both admiration for the Magnificent Lorenzo and Giuliano's own merit. Among the items were a head of the Emperor Hadrian, now positioned above the door of the garden at the Medici house, a life-size nude woman, and a marble statue of a sleeping Cupid—all crafted in high detail. Giuliano sent these as gifts to the Magnificent Lorenzo, who was greatly pleased with the gesture and praised the generosity of this remarkable artist, who had chosen art over gold and silver, a choice few would make. That Cupid is currently in the guardaroba of Duke Cosimo.

Façade of S. Maria Delle Carceri.

FAÇADE OF S. MARIA DELLE CARCERI
(After Giuliano da San Gallo.
Prato)
Alinari
View larger image

FAÇADE OF S. MARIA DELLE CARCERI
(After Giuliano da San Gallo.
Prato)
Alinari
View larger image

Having then returned to Florence, Giuliano was received most graciously by the Magnificent Lorenzo. Now the fancy had taken that Prince to build a convent capable of holding a hundred friars, without the Porta S. Gallo, in order to give satisfaction to Fra Mariano da Ghinazzano, a most learned member of the Order of Eremite Friars of S. Augustine. For this convent models were made by many architects, and in the end that of Giuliano was put into execution, which was the reason that Lorenzo, from this work, gave him the name of Giuliano da San Gallo. Wherefore Giuliano, who heard himself called by everyone "da San Gallo," said one day in jest to the Magnificent Lorenzo, "By giving me this new name of 'da San Gallo,' you are making me lose the ancient name of my house, so that, in place of going forward in the matter of lineage, as I thought to do, I am going backward." Whereupon Lorenzo answered that he would rather have him become the founder of a new house through his own worth, than depend on others; at which Giuliano was well content.

After returning to Florence, Giuliano was welcomed warmly by the Magnificent Lorenzo. The Prince had decided to build a convent that could accommodate a hundred friars, just outside the Porta S. Gallo, to please Fra Mariano da Ghinazzano, a highly educated member of the Order of Eremite Friars of St. Augustine. Many architects created models for this convent, and ultimately, Giuliano's design was chosen for construction, which is why Lorenzo started calling him Giuliano da San Gallo. Giuliano, noticing that everyone referred to him as "da San Gallo," jokingly remarked to the Magnificent Lorenzo one day, "By giving me this new name of 'da San Gallo,' you're making me lose the ancient name of my family. Instead of advancing my lineage, as I intended, I feel like I'm going backward." Lorenzo replied that he preferred for Giuliano to establish a new lineage based on his own merit rather than relying on others, which made Giuliano quite happy.

Meanwhile the work of S. Gallo was carried on, together with [Pg 195] Lorenzo's other buildings; but neither the convent nor the others were finished, by reason of the death of Lorenzo. And even the completed part of this structure of S. Gallo did not long remain standing, because in 1530, on account of the siege of Florence, it was destroyed and thrown to the ground, together with the whole suburb, the piazza of which was completely surrounded by very beautiful buildings; and at the present day there is no trace to be seen there of house, church, or convent.

Meanwhile, the construction of S. Gallo continued, along with Lorenzo's other buildings; however, neither the convent nor the others were completed due to Lorenzo's death. Even the finished part of the S. Gallo structure didn't last long, because in 1530, during the siege of Florence, it was destroyed and brought down, along with the entire suburb, which had been completely surrounded by beautiful buildings. Today, there is no trace of any house, church, or convent left there.

At this time there took place the death of the King of Naples, whereupon Giuliano Gondi, a very rich Florentine merchant, returned from that city to Florence, and commissioned Giuliano da San Gallo, with whom he had become very intimate on account of his visit to Naples, to build him a palace in rustic work, opposite to S. Firenze, above the place where the lions used to be. This palace was to form the angle of the piazza and to face the old Mercatanzia; but the death of Giuliano Gondi put a stop to the work. In it, among other things, Giuliano made a chimney-piece, very rich in carvings, and so varied and beautiful in composition, that up to that time there had never been seen the like, nor one with such a wealth of figures. The same master made a palace for a Venetian in Camerata, without the Porta a Pinti, and many houses for private citizens, of which there is no need to make mention.

At this time, the King of Naples passed away, which led Giuliano Gondi, a wealthy Florentine merchant, to return from that city to Florence. He hired Giuliano da San Gallo, with whom he had become quite close during his visit to Naples, to build him a rustic-style palace opposite S. Firenze, above where the lions used to be. This palace was meant to corner the piazza and face the old Mercatanzia; however, Giuliano Gondi's death halted the construction. In the palace, among other features, Giuliano created a fireplace mantel, richly carved and uniquely beautiful in design, unlike anything seen before, filled with a variety of figures. The same master also built a palace for a Venetian in Camerata, just outside the Porta a Pinti, along with many homes for private citizens, though it’s not necessary to list them all.

Lorenzo the Magnificent, in order to benefit the commonwealth and adorn the State, and at the same time to leave behind him some splendid monument, in addition to the endless number that he had already erected, wished to execute the fortification of the Poggio Imperiale, above Poggibonsi, on the road to Rome, with a view to founding a city there; and he would not lay it out without the advice and design of Giuliano. Wherefore that master began that most famous structure, in which he made the well-designed and beautiful range of fortifications that we see at the present day.

Lorenzo the Magnificent, wanting to benefit the community and enhance the state while also leaving behind a grand monument—on top of the countless ones he had already built—decided to fortify the Poggio Imperiale, above Poggibonsi, along the road to Rome, with the intent of establishing a city there; and he wouldn’t proceed without the guidance and design of Giuliano. As a result, that master began the construction of that renowned structure, where he created the well-designed and beautiful fortifications that we see today.

These works brought him such fame, that he was then summoned to Milan, through the mediation of Lorenzo, by the Duke of Milan, to the end that he might make for him the model of a palace; and there Giuliano was no less honoured by the Duke than he had previously been honoured by the King of Naples, when that Sovereign had invited him [Pg 196] to that city. For when he had presented the model to him, on the part of the Magnificent Lorenzo, the Duke was filled with astonishment and marvel at seeing the vast number of beautiful adornments in it, so well arranged and distributed, and all accommodated in their places with art and grace; for which reason all the materials necessary for the work were got together, and they began to put it into execution. In the same city, together with Giuliano, was Leonardo da Vinci, who was working for the Duke; and Leonardo, speaking with Giuliano about the casting of the horse that he was proposing to make, received from him some excellent suggestions. This work was broken to pieces on the arrival of the French, so that the horse was never finished; nor could the palace be brought to completion.

These works brought him so much fame that he was summoned to Milan, thanks to Lorenzo’s influence, by the Duke of Milan, so that he could create a model for a palace. There, Giuliano was honored by the Duke just as he had been honored by the King of Naples when that sovereign invited him [Pg 196] to that city. When he presented the model on behalf of the Magnificent Lorenzo, the Duke was amazed and marveled at the numerous beautiful decorations, so well arranged and placed with skill and elegance. Because of this, all the materials needed for the project were gathered and work began. In the same city, alongside Giuliano, was Leonardo da Vinci, who was also working for the Duke. Leonardo discussed the horse he planned to cast with Giuliano, who offered him some great suggestions. However, this project was destroyed when the French arrived, and the horse was never completed, nor could the palace be finished.

Having returned to Florence, Giuliano found that his brother Antonio, who worked for him on his models, had become so excellent, that there was no one in his day who was a better master in carving, particularly for large Crucifixes of wood; to which witness is borne by the one over the high-altar of the Nunziata in Florence, by another that is kept by the Friars of S. Gallo in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, and by a third in the Company of the Scalzo, which are all held to be very good. But Giuliano removed him from that profession and caused him to give his attention to architecture, in company with himself, since he had many works to execute, both public and private.

Having returned to Florence, Giuliano found that his brother Antonio, who had been helping him with his models, had become so skilled that there was no one better in his time when it came to carving, especially large wooden Crucifixes. This is evident from the one over the high altar of the Nunziata in Florence, another kept by the Friars of S. Gallo in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, and a third in the Company of the Scalzo, all of which are considered very impressive. However, Giuliano took him out of that field and encouraged him to focus on architecture alongside him, as he had many projects to complete, both public and private.

Now it happened, as it is always happening, that Fortune, the enemy of talent, robbed the followers of the arts of their hope and support by the death of Lorenzo de' Medici, which was a heavy loss not only to all able craftsmen and to his country, but also to all Italy. Wherefore Giuliano, together with all the other lofty spirits, was left wholly inconsolable; and in his grief he betook himself to Prato, near Florence, in order to build the Temple of the Madonna delle Carcere, since all building in Florence, both public and private, was at a standstill. He lived in Prato, therefore, three whole years, supporting the expense, discomfort, and sorrow as best he could.

Now it happened, as it often does, that Fortune, the enemy of talent, took away the hope and support of those in the arts with the death of Lorenzo de' Medici. This was a significant loss, not just for skilled craftsmen and his country, but for all of Italy. As a result, Giuliano, along with many other great minds, was left completely heartbroken. In his sorrow, he went to Prato, near Florence, to build the Temple of the Madonna delle Carcere, since all construction in Florence, public and private, had come to a halt. He lived in Prato for three entire years, managing the expenses, discomfort, and grief as best as he could.

At the end of that time, it being proposed to roof the Church of the Madonna at Loreto, and to raise the cupola, which had been formerly [Pg 197] begun but not finished by Giuliano da Maiano, and those who had charge of the matter doubting that the piers were too weak to bear such a weight, they wrote, therefore, to Giuliano, that if he desired such a work, he should go and see it for himself. And having gone, like the bold and able man that he was, he showed them that the cupola could be raised with ease, and that he had courage enough for the task; and so many, and of such a kind, were the reasons that he put before them, that the work was allotted to him. After receiving this commission, he caused the work in Prato to be despatched, and made his way, with the same master-builders and stone-cutters, to Loreto. And to the end that this structure, besides beauty of form, might be firm, solid, stable, and well bound in the stonework, he sent to Rome for pozzolana[22]; nor was any lime used that was not mixed with it, nor any stone built in without it; and thus, within the space of three years, it was brought to perfect completion, ready for use.

At the end of that time, there was a proposal to put a roof on the Church of the Madonna at Loreto and to raise the dome, which had been started but never finished by Giuliano da Maiano. Those in charge were unsure if the piers could support such a heavy weight, so they wrote to Giuliano, suggesting that if he was serious about the project, he should come and see it himself. When he arrived, being the bold and skilled man he was, he demonstrated that the dome could easily be raised and that he had the confidence to take on the challenge. He presented so many convincing arguments that the work was assigned to him. After receiving the commission, he wrapped up the work in Prato and headed to Loreto with the same master builders and stone cutters. To ensure that the structure was not just visually appealing but also firm, solid, and stable in the stonework, he sent to Rome for pozzolana; no lime was used that wasn't mixed with it, nor was any stone laid without it. Thus, within three years, the project was completed and ready for use.

Giuliano then went to Rome, where, for Pope Alexander VI, he restored the roof of S. Maria Maggiore, which was falling into ruin; and he made there the ceiling that is to be seen at the present day. While he was thus employed about the Court, Bishop della Rovere, who had been the friend of Giuliano from the time when he was Castellan of Ostia, and who had been created Cardinal of S. Pietro in Vincula, caused him to make a model for the Palace of S. Pietro in Vincula. And a little time after, desiring to build a palace in his own city of Savona, he wished to have it erected likewise from the design and under the eye of Giuliano. But such a journey was difficult for Giuliano, for the reason that his ceiling was not yet finished, and Pope Alexander would not let him go. He entrusted the finishing of it, therefore, to his brother Antonio, who, having a good and versatile intelligence, and coming thus into contact with the Court, entered into the service of the Pope, who conceived a very great affection for him; and this he proved when he resolved to restore, with new foundations and with defences after the manner of a castle, the Mausoleum of Hadrian, now called the Castello di S. Angelo, for Antonio was made overseer of this undertaking, and under his [Pg 198] direction were made the great towers below, the ditches, and the rest of the fortifications that we see at the present day. This work brought him great credit with the Pope, and with his son, Duke Valentino; and it led to his building the fortress that is now to be seen at Cività Castellana. Thus, then, while that Pontiff was alive, he was continually employed in building; and while working for him, he was rewarded by him no less than he was esteemed.

Giuliano then went to Rome, where he restored the roof of S. Maria Maggiore for Pope Alexander VI, which was falling apart; he also created the ceiling that we can still see today. While working at the Court, Bishop della Rovere, who had been a friend of Giuliano since his time as Castellan of Ostia and was later made Cardinal of S. Pietro in Vincula, had him create a model for the Palace of S. Pietro in Vincula. Soon after, wanting to build a palace in his hometown of Savona, he wanted it to be designed and supervised by Giuliano as well. However, this journey was difficult for Giuliano since his ceiling was not yet completed, and Pope Alexander wouldn’t allow him to leave. So, he entrusted the finishing of it to his brother Antonio, who was intelligent and versatile, and, becoming acquainted with the Court, entered the service of the Pope, who grew very fond of him. This was evident when the Pope decided to restore the Mausoleum of Hadrian, now known as the Castello di S. Angelo, building new foundations and defenses like a castle. Antonio was put in charge of this project, and under his [Pg 198] supervision, the large towers, ditches, and other fortifications we see today were constructed. This work earned him great respect from the Pope and his son, Duke Valentino, and it led him to build the fortress still visible at Cività Castellana. Thus, while that Pontiff was alive, he was constantly busy with construction, and while working for him, he was rewarded as much as he was valued.

Giuliano had already carried well forward the work at Savona, when the Cardinal returned to Rome on some business of his own, leaving many workmen to bring the building to completion after the directions and design of Giuliano, whom he took with him to Rome. Giuliano made that journey willingly, wishing to see Antonio and his works; and he stayed there some months. During that time, however, the Cardinal fell into disgrace with the Pope, and departed from Rome, in order not to be taken prisoner, and Giuliano, as before, went in his company. On arriving at Savona, they set a much greater number of master-builders and other artificers to work on the building. But the threats of the Pope against the Cardinal becoming every day louder, it was not long before he made his way to Avignon. From there he sent as a present to the King of France a model for a palace that Giuliano had made for him, which was marvellous, very rich in ornament, and spacious enough for the accommodation of his whole Court. The royal Court was at Lyons when Giuliano presented his model; and the gift was so welcome and acceptable to the King, that he rewarded Giuliano liberally and gave him infinite praise, besides rendering many thanks for it to the Cardinal, who was at Avignon.

Giuliano had already made significant progress on the work at Savona when the Cardinal returned to Rome for his own business. He left many workers there to finish the building under Giuliano's direction, whom he brought with him to Rome. Giuliano was eager to make the trip, wanting to see Antonio and his works, and he stayed for several months. However, during that time, the Cardinal fell out of favor with the Pope and left Rome to avoid being captured, with Giuliano accompanying him once again. Upon arriving at Savona, they brought in many more master builders and artisans to work on the project. But as the Pope's threats against the Cardinal grew louder each day, it wasn't long before he traveled to Avignon. From there, he sent a stunning model of a palace that Giuliano had created as a gift to the King of France, which was incredibly elaborate and spacious enough to house his entire Court. The royal Court was in Lyons when Giuliano presented his model, and the King received the gift so gratefully that he rewarded Giuliano generously and lavished him with praise while also expressing many thanks to the Cardinal, who was in Avignon.

Meanwhile they received news that the palace at Savona was already nearly finished; whereupon the Cardinal determined that Giuliano should once more see the work, and Giuliano, having gone for this purpose to Savona, had not been there long when it was completely finished. Then, desiring to return to Florence, where he had not been for a long time, Giuliano took the road for that city together with his master-builders. Now at that time the King of France had restored Pisa her liberty, and the war between the Florentines and the Pisans was still raging; and [Pg 199] Giuliano, wishing to pass through Pisan territory, had a safe-conduct made out for his company at Lucca, for they had no small apprehension about the Pisan soldiers. Nevertheless, while passing near Altopascio, they were captured by the Pisans, who cared nothing for safe-conducts or for any other warrant that they might have. And for six months Giuliano was detained in Pisa, his ransom being fixed at three hundred ducats; nor was he able to return to Florence until he had paid it.

Meanwhile, they received news that the palace at Savona was almost finished; so the Cardinal decided that Giuliano should see the work again. Giuliano went to Savona for this purpose and didn’t stay long before the project was completely finished. Then, wanting to return to Florence, where he hadn’t been for a while, Giuliano set off for the city with his master-builders. At that time, the King of France had restored Pisa's freedom, and the conflict between the Florentines and the Pisans was still ongoing; and [Pg 199] Giuliano, looking to pass through Pisan territory, secured safe passage for his group in Lucca since they were quite worried about the Pisan soldiers. However, while passing near Altopascio, they were captured by the Pisans, who paid no attention to safe conducts or any other permits that they might have. Giuliano was held in Pisa for six months, with his ransom set at three hundred ducats; he couldn’t return to Florence until he paid it.

Antonio had heard this news in Rome, and, desiring to see his native city and his brother again, obtained leave to depart from Rome; and on his way he designed for Duke Valentino the fortress of Montefiascone. Finally, in the year 1503, he reached Florence, where the two brothers and their friends took joyful pleasure in each other's company.

Antonio heard this news in Rome, and wanting to see his hometown and his brother again, got permission to leave Rome. On his way, he planned to present the fortress of Montefiascone to Duke Valentino. Eventually, in 1503, he arrived in Florence, where the two brothers and their friends happily enjoyed each other's company.

There now ensued the death of Alexander VI, and the election of Pius III, who lived but a short time; whereupon the Cardinal of S. Pietro in Vincula was created Pontiff, under the name of Pope Julius II; which brought great joy to Giuliano, on account of his having been so long in his service, and he determined, therefore, to go to kiss the Pope's foot. Having then arrived in Rome, he was warmly received and welcomed lovingly, and was straightway commissioned to execute the first buildings undertaken by that Pope before the coming of Bramante.

The death of Alexander VI occurred, followed by the election of Pius III, who only lived for a short time. Afterward, the Cardinal of S. Pietro in Vincula was made Pope, taking the name Julius II. This brought great joy to Giuliano, who had served him for so long, so he decided to go and kiss the Pope's foot. When he arrived in Rome, he received a warm welcome and was immediately assigned to work on the first buildings that the Pope had planned before Bramante arrived.

Antonio, who had remained in Florence, continued, in the absence of Giuliano (Piero Soderini being Gonfalonier), the building of the Poggio Imperiale, to which all the Pisan prisoners were sent to labour, in order to finish the work the quicker. After this, by reason of the troubles at Arezzo, the old fortress was destroyed, and Antonio made the model for the new one, with the consent of Giuliano, who had come from Rome for this purpose, but soon returned thither; and this work was the reason that Antonio was appointed architect to the Commune of Florence for all the fortifications.

Antonio, who stayed in Florence, kept working on the Poggio Imperiale while Giuliano was away (with Piero Soderini as Gonfalonier). All the Pisan prisoners were sent there to help speed up the construction. Later, due to the issues in Arezzo, the old fortress was torn down, and Antonio created the design for the new one with Giuliano's approval, who had come from Rome just for this but quickly went back. This project led to Antonio being named the architect for all the fortifications of the Commune of Florence.

On the return of Giuliano to Rome, the question was being debated as to whether the divine Michelagnolo Buonarroti should make the tomb of Pope Julius; whereupon Giuliano exhorted the Pope to pursue that undertaking, adding that it seemed to him that it was necessary to build a special chapel for such a monument, and that it should not be placed [Pg 200] in the old S. Pietro, in which there was no space for it, whereas a new chapel would bring out all the perfection of the work. After many architects, then, had made designs, the matter little by little became one of such importance, that, in place of erecting a chapel, a beginning was made with the great fabric of the new S. Pietro. There had arrived in Rome, about that time, the architect Bramante of Castel Durante, who had been in Lombardy; and he went to work in such a manner, with various extraordinary means and methods of his own, and with his fantastic ideas, having on his side Baldassarre Peruzzi, Raffaello da Urbino, and other architects, that he put the whole undertaking into confusion; whereby much time was consumed in discussions. Finally—so well did he know how to set about the matter—the work was entrusted to him, as the man who had shown the finest judgment, the best intelligence, and the greatest invention.

On Giuliano's return to Rome, there was a debate about whether the great Michelangelo Buonarroti should create the tomb for Pope Julius. Giuliano urged the Pope to take on this project, stating that it seemed essential to build a special chapel for such a monument and that it shouldn't be located [Pg 200] in the old St. Peter's, which lacked the space for it. A new chapel would showcase the work's perfection. After numerous architects submitted designs, the issue gradually grew so significant that, instead of simply constructing a chapel, the groundwork for the massive new St. Peter's began. Around that time, the architect Bramante from Castel Durante, who had been in Lombardy, arrived in Rome. He worked in such a way, using various innovative techniques and his imaginative ideas, alongside Baldassare Peruzzi, Raphael of Urbino, and other architects, that he created a bit of chaos in the project, leading to long discussions. Ultimately—thanks to his exceptional approach to the project—the work was entrusted to him as he demonstrated the best judgment, intelligence, and creativity.

Giuliano, resenting this, for it appeared to him that he had received an affront from the Pope, in view of the faithful service that he had rendered to him when his rank was not so high, and of the promise made to him by the Pope that he should have that building, sought leave to go; and so, notwithstanding that he was appointed companion to Bramante for other edifices that were being erected in Rome, he departed, and returned, with many gifts received from that Pontiff, to Florence.

Giuliano felt bitter about this because it seemed to him that he had been insulted by the Pope, especially considering the loyal service he had provided when his status wasn't so elevated, along with the promise made to him by the Pope that he would receive that building. He asked for permission to leave; thus, despite being appointed as a companion to Bramante for other structures being built in Rome, he left and returned to Florence, bringing back many gifts from the Pontiff.

This was a great joy to Piero Soderini, who straightway set him to work. Nor had six months gone by, when Messer Bartolommeo della Rovere, the nephew of the Pope, and a friend of Giuliano, wrote to him in the name of his Holiness that he should return for his own advantage to Rome; but neither terms nor promises availed to move Giuliano, who considered that he had been put to shame by the Pope. Finally, however, a letter was written to Piero Soderini, urging him in one way or another to send Giuliano to Rome, since his Holiness wished to finish the fortifications of the Great Round Tower, which had been begun by Nicholas V, and likewise those of the Borgo and the Belvedere, with other works; and Giuliano allowed himself to be persuaded by Soderini, and therefore went to Rome, where he received a gracious welcome and many gifts from the Pope.

This made Piero Soderini very happy, so he immediately put him to work. Just six months later, Messer Bartolommeo della Rovere, the Pope's nephew and a friend of Giuliano, wrote to him on behalf of the Pope, urging him to return to Rome for his own benefit. However, neither the offers nor the promises could convince Giuliano, who felt humiliated by the Pope. Eventually, though, a letter was sent to Piero Soderini, asking him in one way or another to send Giuliano to Rome because the Pope wanted to complete the fortifications of the Great Round Tower, which Nicholas V had started, as well as those of the Borgo and the Belvedere, along with other projects. Giuliano was persuaded by Soderini and went to Rome, where he received a warm welcome and many gifts from the Pope.

[Pg 201] Having afterwards gone to Bologna, from which the Bentivogli had just been driven out, the Pope resolved, by the advice of Giuliano, to have a figure of himself in bronze made by Michelagnolo Buonarroti; and this was carried out, as will be related in the Life of Michelagnolo himself. Giuliano also followed the Pope to Mirandola, and after it was taken, having endured much fatigue and many discomforts, he returned with the Court to Rome. But the furious desire to drive the French out of Italy not having yet got out of the head of the Pope, he strove to wrest the government of Florence out of the hands of Piero Soderini, whose power was no small hindrance to him in the project that he had in mind. Whereupon, since the Pontiff, for these reasons, had turned aside from building and had embroiled himself in wars, Giuliano, by this time weary, and perceiving that attention was being given only to the construction of S. Pietro, and not much even to that, sought leave from him to depart. But the Pope answered him in anger, "Do you believe that you are the only Giuliano da San Gallo to be found?" To which he replied that none could be found equal to him in faithful service, while he himself would easily find Princes truer to their promises than the Pope had been towards him. However, the Pontiff would by no means give him leave to go, saying that he would speak to him about it another time.

[Pg 201] After going to Bologna, where the Bentivogli had just been ousted, the Pope decided, with Giuliano's advice, to have a bronze statue of himself made by Michelangelo Buonarroti; this was carried out, as will be discussed in Michelangelo's own biography. Giuliano also followed the Pope to Mirandola, and after the city was captured, he returned to Rome with the Court, having endured much fatigue and discomfort. However, the Pope's intense desire to drive the French out of Italy still lingered, and he aimed to take control of Florence away from Piero Soderini, whose power was a significant obstacle to his plans. Because of this, the Pontiff shifted his focus from building projects to getting involved in wars. By this point, Giuliano was weary and realized that only S. Pietro was receiving attention in construction, and even that was lacking. He asked for permission to leave. The Pope responded angrily, "Do you think you’re the only Giuliano da San Gallo around?" Giuliano replied that no one was as devoted as he was, while he could easily find princes who were more trustworthy than the Pope had been to him. Still, the Pope refused to let him go, saying he would discuss it again later.

Meanwhile Bramante, having brought Raffaello da Urbino to Rome, set him to work at painting the Papal apartments; whereupon Giuliano, perceiving that the Pope took great delight in those pictures, and knowing that he wished to have the ceiling of the chapel of his uncle Sixtus painted, spoke to him of Michelagnolo, adding that he had already executed the bronze statue in Bologna. Which news pleased the Pope so much that he sent for Michelagnolo, who, on arriving in Rome, received the commission for the ceiling of that chapel.

Meanwhile, Bramante brought Raffaello da Urbino to Rome and got him started on painting the Papal apartments. Giuliano noticed that the Pope really enjoyed those paintings and knew he wanted the ceiling of his uncle Sixtus's chapel painted. So, he mentioned Michelangelo, adding that he had already made the bronze statue in Bologna. This news delighted the Pope so much that he called for Michelangelo, who, upon arriving in Rome, received the commission for the ceiling of that chapel.

A little time after this, Giuliano coming back once more to seek leave from the Pope to depart, his Holiness, seeing him determined on this, was content that he should return to Florence, without forfeiting his favour; and, after having blessed him, he gave him a purse of red satin containing five hundred crowns, telling him that he might return [Pg 202] home to rest, but that he would always be his friend. Giuliano, then, having kissed the sacred foot, returned to Florence, at the very time when Pisa was surrounded and besieged by the army of Florence. No sooner had he arrived, therefore, than Piero Soderini, after the due greetings, sent him to the camp to help the military commissaries, who had found themselves unable to prevent the Pisans from passing provisions into Pisa by way of the Arno. Giuliano made a design for a bridge of boats to be built at some better season, and then went back to Florence; and when spring had come, taking with him his brother Antonio, he made his way to Pisa, where they constructed a bridge, which was a very ingenious piece of work, since, besides the fact that, rising or falling with the water, and being well bound with chains, it stood safe and sound against floods, it carried out the desires of the commissaries in such a manner, cutting off Pisa from access to the sea by way of the Arno, that the Pisans, having no other expedient in their sore straits, were forced to come to terms with the Florentines; and so they surrendered. Nor was it long before the same Piero Soderini again sent Giuliano, with a vast number of master-builders, to Pisa, where with extraordinary swiftness he erected the fortress that still stands at the Porta a S. Marco, and also the gate itself, which he built in the Doric Order. And the while that Giuliano was engaged on this work, which was until the year 1512, Antonio went through the whole dominion, inspecting and restoring the fortresses and other public buildings.

A little while later, Giuliano came back to ask the Pope for permission to leave again. His Holiness, seeing that he was set on this, agreed that he could return to Florence without losing his favor. After blessing him, he gave him a red satin purse containing five hundred crowns, telling him he could go home to relax but would always be his friend. Giuliano then kissed the sacred foot and returned to Florence, just as Pisa was being surrounded and besieged by the Florentine army. As soon as he arrived, Piero Soderini, after the usual greetings, sent him to the camp to assist the military commissaries, who were struggling to stop the Pisans from bringing supplies into Pisa via the Arno River. Giuliano designed a bridge of boats to be built at a later time and then went back to Florence. When spring arrived, he took his brother Antonio and headed to Pisa, where they built a bridge that was a clever piece of engineering. It rose and fell with the water, was well secured with chains, and held up against floods. This bridge effectively cut off Pisa’s access to the sea through the Arno, forcing the Pisans, in their dire situation, to negotiate with the Florentines, leading to their surrender. Not long after, Piero Soderini sent Giuliano again to Pisa, along with many master builders. With remarkable speed, he constructed the fortress that still stands at the Porta a S. Marco, as well as the gate itself, built in the Doric order. While Giuliano was working on this project, which lasted until 1512, Antonio traveled throughout the territory, inspecting and restoring fortresses and other public buildings.

After this, by the favour of the same Pope Julius, the house of Medici was reinstated in the government of Florence, from which they had been driven out on the invasion of Italy by Charles VIII, King of France, and Piero Soderini was expelled from the Palace; and the Medici showed their gratitude to Giuliano and Antonio for the services that they had rendered in the past to their illustrious family. Now Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici having been elected Pope a short time after the death of Julius II, Giuliano was forced once again to betake himself to Rome; where, Bramante dying not long after his arrival, it was proposed to give to Giuliano the charge of the building of S. Pietro. But he, being worn out by his labours, and crushed down by old age and by the [Pg 203] stone, which made his life a burden, returned by leave of his Holiness to Florence; and that commission was given to the most gracious Raffaello da Urbino. And Giuliano, after two years, was pressed so sorely by his malady, that he died at the age of seventy-four in the year 1517, leaving his name to the world, his body to the earth, and his soul to God.

After this, thanks to Pope Julius, the Medici family was restored to power in Florence, from which they had been expelled when Charles VIII of France invaded Italy, and Piero Soderini was removed from the Palace. The Medici expressed their gratitude to Giuliano and Antonio for the support they had given to their distinguished family in the past. Soon after, Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici was elected Pope shortly after Julius II's death, forcing Giuliano to go back to Rome. When Bramante died shortly after he arrived, there was a proposal to assign Giuliano the responsibility of building St. Peter's. However, he was exhausted from his work and burdened by old age and a painful stone condition, so he returned to Florence with the permission of His Holiness. That commission was then given to the very talented Raffaello da Urbino. After two years, Giuliano's illness became too much for him, and he passed away at the age of seventy-four in 1517, leaving his name to the world, his body to the earth, and his soul to God.

By his departure he left a heavy burden of sorrow to his brother Antonio, who loved him tenderly, and to a son of his own named Francesco, who was engaged in sculpture, although he was still quite young. This Francesco, who has preserved up to our own day all the treasures of his elders, and holds them in veneration, executed many works at Florence and elsewhere, both in sculpture and in architecture, and by his hand is the Madonna of marble, with the Child in her arms, and lying in the lap of S. Anne, that is in Orsanmichele; which work, with the figures carved in the round out of one single block, was held, as it still is, to be very beautiful. He has also executed the tomb that Pope Clement caused to be made for Piero de' Medici at Monte Cassino, besides many other works, of which no mention is here made because the said Francesco is still alive.

By leaving, he placed a heavy burden of grief on his brother Antonio, who loved him dearly, and on his son Francesco, who was young and involved in sculpture. This Francesco, who has preserved all the treasures of his ancestors and holds them in great respect, created many works in Florence and beyond, including both sculpture and architecture. Among his creations is the marble Madonna with the Child in her arms, resting in the lap of St. Anne, located in Orsanmichele; this piece, carved from a single block, has always been regarded as very beautiful. He also created the tomb that Pope Clement commissioned for Piero de' Medici at Monte Cassino, along with many other works not mentioned here because Francesco is still alive.

After the death of Giuliano, Antonio, being a man who was not willing to stay idle, made two large Crucifixes of wood, one of which was sent into Spain, while the other, by order of the Vice-Chancellor, Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, was taken by Domenico Buoninsegni into France. It being then proposed to build the fortress of Livorno, Antonio was sent thither by Cardinal de' Medici to make the design for it; which he did, although it was afterwards not carried completely into execution, nor even after the method suggested by Antonio. After this, the men of Montepulciano determining, by reason of the miracles wrought by an image of Our Lady, to build a temple for it at very great cost, Antonio made the model for this, and became head of the undertaking; on which account he visited that building twice a year. At the present day it is to be seen carried to perfect completion, having been executed with supreme grace, and with truly marvellous beauty and variety of composition, by the genius of Antonio, and all the masonry is of a certain stone that has a tinge of white, after the manner of travertine. It [Pg 204] stands without the Porta di S. Biagio, on the right hand, half-way up the slope of the hill. At this time, he made a beginning with a palace in the township of Monte San Sovino, for Antonio di Monte, Cardinal of Santa Prassedia; and he built another for the same man at Montepulciano, both being executed and finished with extraordinary grace.

After Giuliano's death, Antonio, who was not one to sit around, created two large wooden crucifixes. One was sent to Spain, while the other was taken to France by Domenico Buoninsegni on the orders of Vice-Chancellor Cardinal Giulio de' Medici. When they decided to build the fortress of Livorno, Cardinal de' Medici sent Antonio there to design it, which he did, but the plans were not fully realized, nor were they carried out as Antonio initially suggested. Following this, the people of Montepulciano, inspired by the miracles performed by an image of Our Lady, decided to construct a costly temple for it. Antonio created the model for this project and took charge of the undertaking, visiting the site twice a year. Today, the temple is completed, showcasing supreme grace and truly marvelous beauty, with a variety of compositions stemming from Antonio's genius. The masonry is made of a certain stone with a hint of white, similar to travertine. It [Pg 204] is located just outside the Porta di S. Biagio, on the right side, halfway up the hill. During this time, he also began work on a palace in the town of Monte San Sovino for Antonio di Monte, Cardinal of Santa Prassedia, and built another for him in Montepulciano, both finished with extraordinary grace.

He made the design for the side of the buildings of the Servite Friars (in Florence), on their Piazza, following the order of the Loggia of the Innocenti; and at Arezzo he made models for the aisles of the Madonna delle Lacrime, although that work was very badly conceived, because it is out of harmony with the original part of the building, and the arches at the ends are not in true line with the centre. He also made a model for the Madonna of Cortona; but I do not think that this was put into execution. He was employed in the siege on the bastions and fortifications within the city, and in this undertaking he had as a companion his nephew Francesco. After this, the Giant of the Piazza, executed by the hand of Michelagnolo, having been set into place in the time of Giuliano, the brother of our Antonio, it was proposed to set up the other, which had been made by Baccio Bandinelli; and the task of bringing it safely into position was given to Antonio, who, taking Baccio d' Agnolo as his companion, carried this out by means of very powerful machines, and placed it in safety on the base that had been prepared for that purpose.

He designed the sides of the buildings for the Servite Friars in Florence, on their Piazza, following the style of the Loggia of the Innocenti. In Arezzo, he created models for the aisles of the Madonna delle Lacrime, though that project was poorly conceived, as it doesn't match the original part of the building, and the arches at the ends aren’t aligned with the center. He also made a model for the Madonna of Cortona, but I don’t believe this was ever built. He was involved in the siege of the bastions and fortifications within the city, working alongside his nephew Francesco. Later, the Giant of the Piazza, made by Michelangelo, was installed during the time of Giuliano, our Antonio's brother. They planned to set up another statue, created by Baccio Bandinelli, and the task of safely positioning it was assigned to Antonio. Together with Baccio d'Agnolo, he accomplished this using powerful machines, successfully placing it on the base prepared for it.

In the end, having become old, he took no pleasure in anything save agriculture, of which he had an excellent knowledge. And then, when on account of old age he was no longer able to bear the discomforts of this world, he rendered up his soul to God, in the year 1534, and was laid to rest by the side of his brother Giuliano in the tomb of the Giamberti, in the Church of S. Maria Novella.

In the end, after becoming old, he found joy only in farming, which he knew very well. Then, when he could no longer handle the hardships of this world due to his old age, he passed away peacefully in 1534 and was buried next to his brother Giuliano in the Giamberti family tomb at the Church of S. Maria Novella.

The marvellous works of these two brothers will bear witness before the world to the extraordinary genius that they possessed; and for their lives, their honourable ways, and their every action, they were held in estimation by all men. Giuliano and Antonio bequeathed to the art of architecture methods that gave the Tuscan Order of building better form than any other architect had yet achieved, and the Doric Order they [Pg 205] enriched with better measures and proportions than their predecessors, following the rules and canons of Vitruvius, had been wont to use. They collected in their houses at Florence an infinite number of most beautiful antiquities in marble, which adorned Florence, and still adorn her, no less than those masters honoured themselves and their art. Giuliano brought from Rome the method of casting vaults with such materials as made them ready carved; examples of which may be seen in a room in his own house, and in the vaulting of the Great Hall at Poggio a Cajano, which is still to be seen there. Wherefore we should acknowledge our obligation to their labours, whereby they fortified the dominion of Florence, adorned the city, and gave a name, throughout the many regions where they worked, to Florence and to the intellects of Tuscany, who, to honour their memory, have written to them these verses—

The amazing works of these two brothers will stand as a testament to the incredible talent they had; and throughout their lives, their honorable conduct and every action earned them respect from everyone. Giuliano and Antonio left behind architectural methods that gave the Tuscan Order a better form than any other architect had achieved before, and they enhanced the Doric Order with improved measures and proportions beyond what their predecessors, adhering to the rules of Vitruvius, had used. They gathered an immense collection of beautiful marble antiques in their homes in Florence, which decorated the city and still do, just as those masters honored themselves and their craft. Giuliano introduced from Rome the technique of casting vaults with materials that made them look pre-carved; examples of this can be seen in a room of his house and in the vaulting of the Great Hall at Poggio a Cajano, which can still be viewed today. Therefore, we should recognize our debt to their efforts, by which they strengthened Florence's influence, beautified the city, and gave a name to Florence and the intellects of Tuscany across the many regions where they worked. In honor of their memory, these verses have been written for them—

Cedite Romani structores, cedite Graii,
Artis, Vitruvi, tu quoque cede parens.
Etruscos celebrare viros, testudinis arcus,
Urna, tholus, statuæ, templa, domusque petunt.

Cedite Romani builders, cedite Greeks,
Art, Vitruvius, you too take a step back, parent.
Celebrate the Etruscan men, the arches of the tortoise,
Urns, domes, statues, temples, and houses are sought after.


[Pg 207] RAFFAELLO DA URBINO


[Pg 209] LIFE OF RAFFAELLO DA URBINO

[RAFFAELLO SANZIO]

PAINTER AND ARCHITECT

How bountiful and benign Heaven sometimes shows itself in showering upon one single person the infinite riches of its treasures, and all those graces and rarest gifts that it is wont to distribute among many individuals, over a long space of time, could be clearly seen in the no less excellent than gracious Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino, who was endowed by nature with all that modesty and goodness which are seen at times in those who, beyond all other men, have added to their natural sweetness and gentleness the beautiful adornment of courtesy and grace, by reason of which they always show themselves agreeable and pleasant to every sort of person and in all their actions. Him nature presented to the world, when, vanquished by art through the hands of Michelagnolo Buonarroti, she wished to be vanquished, in Raffaello, by art and character together. And in truth, since the greater part of the craftsmen who had lived up to that time had received from nature a certain element of savagery and madness, which, besides making them strange and eccentric, had brought it about that very often there was revealed in them rather the obscure darkness of vice than the brightness and splendour of those virtues that make men immortal, there was right good reason for her to cause to shine out brilliantly in Raffaello, as a contrast to the others, all the rarest qualities of the mind, accompanied by such grace, industry, beauty, modesty, and excellence of character, as would have sufficed to efface any vice, however hideous, and any blot, were it ever so great. Wherefore it may be surely said that those who are the possessors of such rare and numerous gifts as were seen in Raffaello da Urbino, are not merely men, but, if it be not a sin to say it, mortal gods; [Pg 210] and that those who, by means of their works, leave an honourable name written in the archives of fame in this earthly world of ours, can also hope to have to enjoy in Heaven a worthy reward for their labours and merits.

How generous and kind Heaven can be when it showers one person with the immense wealth of its treasures, along with all the graces and rare gifts that it usually spreads among many people over a long period. This was clearly evident in the exceptional and gracious Raffaello Sanzio da Urbino, who was naturally blessed with a rare combination of modesty and goodness. These qualities are often found in those who, more than anyone else, enhance their natural charm and kindness with the beautiful traits of courtesy and grace, making them delightful and pleasant to all sorts of people in every situation. Nature revealed him to the world at a time when she, having been defeated by the artistry of Michelagnolo Buonarroti, wanted to be conquered in Raffaello by both artistic talent and character. Indeed, most craftsmen up to that point had been endowed by nature with a degree of wildness and madness that made them strange and eccentric, often revealing more of the dark shadows of vice than the brilliant virtues that make people immortal. Thus, it was entirely appropriate for her to allow Raffaello to shine brilliantly as a contrast to others, showcasing the rarest qualities of the mind, coupled with grace, diligence, beauty, modesty, and outstanding character—all of which could easily overshadow any vice, no matter how ugly, and erase any stain, no matter how significant. Therefore, it can surely be said that those who possess such extraordinary and numerous gifts as were evident in Raffaello da Urbino are not simply human, but, if it’s not too bold to say, mortal gods; [Pg 210] and those who, through their works, leave a respectable name recorded in the archives of fame in this earthly realm, can also hope to enjoy a deserving reward in Heaven for their efforts and merits.

S. George and the Dragon.

RAPHAEL: S. GEORGE AND THE DRAGON
(S. Petersburg: Hermitage, 39. Panel)
View larger image

RAPHAEL: ST. GEORGE AND THE DRAGON
(St. Petersburg: Hermitage, 39. Panel)
View larger image

Raffaello was born at Urbino, a very famous city in Italy, at three o'clock of the night on Good Friday, in the year 1483, to a father named Giovanni de' Santi, a painter of no great excellence, and yet a man of good intelligence, well able to direct his children on that good path which he himself had not been fortunate enough to have shown to him in his boyhood. And since Giovanni knew how important it is to rear infants, not with the milk of nurses, but with that of their own mothers, no sooner was Raffaello born, to whom with happy augury he gave that name at baptism, than he insisted that this his only child—and he had no more afterwards—should be suckled by his own mother, and that in his tender years he should have his character formed in the house of his parents, rather than learn less gentle or even boorish ways and habits in the houses of peasants or common people. When he was well grown, he began to exercise him in painting, seeing him much inclined to such an art, and possessed of a very beautiful genius: wherefore not many years passed before Raffaello, still a boy, became a great help to Giovanni in many works that he executed in the state of Urbino. In the end, this good and loving father, knowing that his son could learn little from him, made up his mind to place him with Pietro Perugino, who, as he heard tell, held the first place among painters at that time. He went, therefore, to Perugia: but not finding Pietro there, he set himself, in order to lessen the annoyance of waiting for him, to execute some works in S. Francesco. When Pietro had returned from Rome, Giovanni, who was a gentle and well-bred person, formed a friendship with him, and, when the time appeared to have come, in the most adroit method that he knew, told him his desire. And so Pietro, who was very courteous and a lover of beautiful genius, agreed to have Raffaello: whereupon Giovanni, going off rejoicing to Urbino, took the boy, not without many tears on the part of his mother, who loved him dearly, and brought him to Perugia, where Pietro, after seeing Raffaello's method of drawing, and his beautiful [Pg 211] manners and character, formed a judgment of him which time, from the result, proved to be very true.

Raffaello was born in Urbino, a well-known city in Italy, at three o'clock in the morning on Good Friday in 1483. His father, Giovanni de' Santi, was a painter who wasn’t particularly remarkable but was an intelligent man who could guide his children along the right path, something he hadn’t had the chance to experience himself as a child. Giovanni understood the importance of raising children not just with the milk of nurses but with that of their own mothers. So, as soon as Raffaello was born—whom he named at baptism with great hope—he insisted that his only child, as he wouldn’t have more, should be breastfed by his mother. He wanted Raffaello to develop his character at home instead of picking up rough or uncouth habits elsewhere. As Raffaello grew, Giovanni encouraged him to paint, recognizing his strong inclination and natural talent for the art. A few years passed, and still just a boy, Raffaello became a significant help to Giovanni with several projects they worked on in Urbino. Eventually, this caring father realized that his son could learn little more from him, so he decided to apprentice him to Pietro Perugino, who was said to be the top painter of the time. Giovanni traveled to Perugia, but after not finding Pietro there, he started working on some projects at S. Francesco to pass the time. When Pietro returned from Rome, Giovanni, a polite and cultured man, struck up a friendship with him and, when the moment felt right, expressed his desire for Raffaello to study under him. Pietro, who was gracious and appreciated artistic talent, agreed to take Raffaello. Giovanni went back to Urbino joyfully, bringing the boy with him—though not without tears from his mother, who loved him dearly—and brought him to Perugia. After observing Raffaello's drawing style and his charming manners and character, Pietro formed an opinion of him that proved to be very accurate over time.

It is a very notable thing that Raffaello, studying the manner of Pietro, imitated it in every respect so closely, that his copies could not be distinguished from his master's originals, and it was not possible to see any clear difference between his works and Pietro's; as is still evident from some figures in a panel in S. Francesco at Perugia, which he executed in oils for Madonna Maddalena degli Oddi. These are a Madonna who has risen into Heaven, with Jesus Christ crowning her, while below, round the sepulchre, are the twelve Apostles, contemplating the Celestial Glory, and at the foot of the panel is a predella divided into three scenes, painted with little figures, of the Madonna receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, of the Magi adoring Christ, and of Christ in the arms of Simeon in the Temple. This work is executed with truly supreme diligence; and one who had not a good knowledge of the two manners, would hold it as certain that it is by the hand of Pietro, whereas it is without a doubt by the hand of Raffaello.

It’s remarkable that Raffaello, studying Pietro's style, copied it so closely that his versions couldn't be told apart from his master's originals, with no clear difference visible between his works and Pietro's. This is still evident in some figures from a panel in S. Francesco at Perugia, which he painted in oils for Madonna Maddalena degli Oddi. The artwork features a Madonna ascending to Heaven, with Jesus Christ crowning her, while below, around the tomb, are the twelve Apostles gazing at the Celestial Glory. At the bottom of the panel is a predella divided into three scenes, depicted with small figures: the Madonna receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, the Magi adoring Christ, and Christ in the arms of Simeon in the Temple. This piece is created with truly exceptional effort, and anyone who isn't well-versed in the two styles would likely assume it’s by Pietro, but it is undoubtedly by Raffaello.

After this work, Pietro returning to Florence on some business of his own, Raffaello departed from Perugia and went off with some friends to Città di Castello, where he painted a panel for S. Agostino in the same manner, and likewise one of a Crucifixion for S. Domenico, which, if his name were not written upon it, no one would believe to be a work by Raffaello, but rather by Pietro. For S. Francesco, also in the same city, he painted a little panel-picture of the Marriage of Our Lady, in which one may recognize the excellence of Raffaello increasing and growing in refinement, and surpassing the manner of Pietro. In this work is a temple drawn in perspective with such loving care, that it is a marvellous thing to see the difficulties that he was for ever seeking out in this branch of his profession.

After this project, Pietro went back to Florence for some of his own business, while Raffaello left Perugia and went with some friends to Città di Castello. There, he painted a panel for S. Agostino in the same style, as well as a Crucifixion for S. Domenico. If his name weren’t on it, no one would think it was a work by Raffaello; they would assume it was by Pietro instead. For S. Francesco, also in that city, he painted a small panel of the Marriage of Our Lady, showing Raffaello’s talent getting increasingly refined and surpassing Pietro’s style. This piece features a temple drawn in perspective with such meticulous attention that it’s impressive to see the challenges he continuously sought out in this aspect of his work.

Meanwhile, when he had acquired very great fame by following his master's manner, Pope Pius II[23] had given the commission for painting the library of the Duomo at Siena to Pinturicchio; and he, being a friend [Pg 212] of Raffaello, and knowing him to be an excellent draughtsman, brought him to Siena, where Raffaello made for him some of the drawings and cartoons for that work. The reason that he did not continue at it was that some painters in Siena kept extolling with vast praise the cartoon that Leonardo da Vinci had made in the Sala del Papa[24] of a very beautiful group of horsemen, to be painted afterwards in the Hall of the Palace of the Signoria, and likewise some nudes executed by Michelagnolo Buonarroti in competition with Leonardo, and much better; and Raffaello, on account of the love that he always bore to the excellent in art, was seized by such a desire to see them, that, putting aside that work and all thought of his own advantage and comfort, he went off to Florence.

Meanwhile, after gaining significant fame by emulating his master’s style, Pope Pius II[23] commissioned Pinturicchio to paint the library of the Duomo in Siena. Pinturicchio, being a friend of Raffaello and knowing him to be an excellent draftsman, invited him to Siena, where Raffaello created some drawings and sketches for the project. The reason he didn’t continue with it was that some painters in Siena were praising the sketch Leonardo da Vinci made in the Sala del Papa[24] of a beautiful group of horsemen, which was to be painted later in the Hall of the Palace of the Signoria, as well as some nudes done by Michelagnolo Buonarroti that were better than Leonardo’s. Raffaello, always passionate about excellence in art, was so eager to see these works that he set aside that project and any thoughts of his own benefit and comfort to head to Florence.

Having arrived there, and being pleased no less with the city than with those works, which appeared to him to be divine, he determined to take up his abode there for some time; and thus he formed a friendship with some young painters, among whom were Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, Aristotile da San Gallo, and others, and became much honoured in that city, particularly by Taddeo Taddei, who, being one who always loved any man inclined to excellence, would have him ever in his house and at his table. And Raffaello, who was gentleness itself, in order not to be beaten in courtesy, made him two pictures, which incline to his first manner, derived from Pietro, but also to the other much better manner that he afterwards acquired by study, as will be related; which pictures are still in the house of the heirs of the said Taddeo.

Having arrived there and being just as impressed with the city as with the divine works he saw, he decided to settle there for a while. During this time, he formed friendships with some young painters, including Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, Aristotile da San Gallo, and others. He became well-respected in the city, especially by Taddeo Taddei, who always appreciated anyone with a passion for excellence and invited him to his home and table frequently. Raffaello, known for his kindness, created two paintings for Taddeo to show his appreciation. These paintings reflect his early style, influenced by Pietro, but also showcase the superior technique he later developed through study, as will be discussed. These works are still in the possession of Taddeo's heirs.

Lo Sposalizio.

LO SPOSALIZIO
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Milan: Brera, 472)
Anderson
View larger image

LO SPOSALIZIO
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Milan: Brera, 472)
Anderson
View larger image

Raffaello also formed a very great friendship with Lorenzo Nasi; and for this Lorenzo, who had taken a wife about that time, he painted a picture in which he made a Madonna, and between her legs her Son, to whom a little S. John, full of joy, is offering a bird, with great delight and pleasure for both of them. In the attitude of each is a certain childlike simplicity which is wholly lovely, besides that they are so well coloured, and executed with such diligence, that they appear to be rather of living flesh than wrought by means of colour and draughtsmanship; the Madonna, likewise, has an air truly full of grace and divinity; and the foreground, the landscapes, and in short all the rest of the work, are [Pg 213] most beautiful. This picture was held by Lorenzo Nasi, as long as he lived, in very great veneration, both in memory of Raffaello, who had been so much his friend, and on account of the dignity and excellence of the work; but afterwards, on August 9, in the year 1548, it met an evil fate, when, on account of the collapse of the hill of S. Giorgio, the house of Lorenzo fell down, together with the ornate and beautiful houses of the heirs of Marco del Nero, and other neighbouring dwellings. However, the pieces of the picture being found among the fragments of the ruins, the son of Lorenzo, Battista, who was a great lover of art, had them put together again as well as was possible.

Raffaello also formed a strong friendship with Lorenzo Nasi; for him, who had recently gotten married, he painted a picture featuring a Madonna and, seated between her legs, her Son, to whom a joyful little St. John is offering a bird, bringing great delight to both of them. Each figure shows a certain childlike innocence that is truly beautiful. They are so well-colored and crafted that they look more like living beings than something made with paint and drawing; the Madonna also radiates a sense of grace and divinity. The foreground, the landscapes, and overall, the entire work are [Pg 213] stunning. Lorenzo Nasi held this painting in high esteem throughout his life, both in memory of Raffaello, who had been such a good friend, and because of the dignity and excellence of the artwork. However, on August 9, 1548, it faced a tragic fate when, due to the collapse of the hill of S. Giorgio, Lorenzo's house fell down, along with the ornate and beautiful homes of Marco del Nero's heirs and other nearby buildings. Nevertheless, after the pieces of the painting were discovered among the ruins, Lorenzo's son, Battista, who was a great art enthusiast, had them reassembled as best as possible.

Maddalena Doni.

MADDALENA DONI
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Florence: Pitti, 59)
Anderson
View larger image

MADDALENA DONI
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Florence: Pitti, 59)
Anderson
View larger image

After these works, Raffaello was forced to depart from Florence and go to Urbino, where, on account of the death of his mother and of his father Giovanni, all his affairs were in confusion. While he was living in Urbino, therefore, he painted for Guidobaldo da Montefeltro, then Captain of the Florentines, two pictures of Our Lady, small but very beautiful, and in his second manner, which are now in the possession of the most illustrious and excellent Guidobaldo, Duke of Urbino. For the same patron he painted a little picture of Christ praying in the Garden, with the three Apostles sleeping at some distance from Him. This painting is so highly finished, that a miniature could not be better, or in any way different; and after having been a long time in the possession of Francesco Maria, Duke of Urbino, it was then presented by the most illustrious Signora Leonora, his consort, to the Venetians Don Paolo Giustiniano and Don Pietro Quirini, hermits of the holy Hermitage of Camaldoli, who afterwards placed it, as a relic and a very rare thing, and, in a word, as a work by the hand of Raffaello da Urbino, and also to honour the memory of that most illustrious lady, in the apartment of the Superior of that hermitage, where it is held in the veneration that it deserves.

After completing these works, Raffaello had to leave Florence and move to Urbino, where, following the deaths of his mother and father Giovanni, his affairs were in disarray. While living in Urbino, he painted for Guidobaldo da Montefeltro, who was then the Captain of the Florentines, two small but beautiful images of Our Lady, done in his second style, which are now owned by the most distinguished Guidobaldo, Duke of Urbino. For the same patron, he created a small painting of Christ praying in the Garden, with the three Apostles sleeping a short distance away from Him. This painting is so expertly finished that a miniature could not be better or different in any way; after being in the possession of Francesco Maria, Duke of Urbino, for a long time, it was then given by the esteemed Lady Leonora, his wife, to the Venetians Don Paolo Giustiniano and Don Pietro Quirini, hermits of the holy Hermitage of Camaldoli. They later displayed it as a relic and a rare treasure, and indeed, as a work by the hand of Raffaello da Urbino, to honor the memory of that most illustrious lady, in the apartment of the Superior of that hermitage, where it is held in the reverence it deserves.

Having executed these works and settled his affairs, Raffaello returned to Perugia, where he painted a panel-picture of Our Lady, S. John the Baptist, and S. Nicholas, for the Chapel of the Ansidei in the Church of the Servite Friars. And in the Chapel of the Madonna in S. Severo, a little monastery of the Order of Camaldoli, in the same city, [Pg 214] he painted in fresco a Christ in Glory, and a God the Father with angels round Him, and six saints seated, S. Benedict, S. Romualdo, S. Laurence, S. Jerome, S. Mauro, and S. Placido, three on either side; and on this picture, which was held at that time to be most beautiful for a work in fresco, he wrote his name in large and very legible letters. In the same city, also, he was commissioned by the Nuns of S. Anthony of Padua to paint a panel-picture of Our Lady, with Jesus Christ fully dressed, as it pleased those simple and venerable sisters, in her lap, and on either side of the Madonna S. Peter, S. Paul, S. Cecilia, and S. Catherine; to which two holy virgins he gave the sweetest and most lovely expressions of countenance and the most beautifully varied head-dresses that are anywhere to be seen, which was a rare thing in those times. Above this panel, in a lunette, he painted a very beautiful God the Father, and in the predella of the altar three scenes with little figures, of Christ praying in the Garden, bearing the Cross (wherein are some soldiers dragging Him along with most beautiful movements), and lying dead in the lap of His Mother. This work is truly marvellous and devout; and it is held in great veneration by those nuns, and much extolled by all painters.

Having completed these works and sorted out his affairs, Raffaello went back to Perugia, where he painted a panel of Our Lady, St. John the Baptist, and St. Nicholas for the Ansidei Chapel in the Church of the Servite Friars. In the Madonna Chapel at St. Severo, a small monastery of the Camaldoli Order in the same city, [Pg 214] he created a fresco of Christ in Glory, along with God the Father surrounded by angels, and six saints seated: St. Benedict, St. Romualdo, St. Laurence, St. Jerome, St. Mauro, and St. Placido, three on each side. On this piece, which was considered exceptionally beautiful for a fresco at the time, he wrote his name in large, clear letters. He was also commissioned by the Nuns of St. Anthony of Padua to paint a panel of Our Lady, with Jesus Christ fully clothed in her lap, as preferred by those simple and venerable sisters, and flanking the Madonna were St. Peter, St. Paul, St. Cecilia, and St. Catherine; he gave the two holy virgins the sweetest and most charming expressions and the most beautifully varied headpieces seen anywhere, which was quite rare back then. Above this panel, in a lunette, he painted a stunning image of God the Father, and in the predella of the altar, three scenes featuring small figures: Christ praying in the Garden, carrying the Cross (with soldiers dragging Him along in beautifully rendered movements), and lying dead in His Mother’s lap. This work is truly wonderful and reverent; it is held in high esteem by those nuns and much praised by all painters.

I will not refrain from saying that it was recognized, after he had been in Florence, that he changed and improved his manner so much, from having seen many works by the hands of excellent masters, that it had nothing to do with his earlier manner; indeed, the two might have belonged to different masters, one much more excellent than the other in painting.

I have to say that after he spent time in Florence, it was clear that he changed and improved his style significantly. He was influenced by seeing many works by great masters, and his new approach was completely different from his earlier style; in fact, the two styles could belong to different artists, with one being much more skilled than the other in painting.

Before he departed from Perugia, Madonna Atalanta Baglioni besought him that he should consent to paint a panel for her chapel in the Church of S. Francesco; but since he was not able to meet her wishes at that time, he promised her that, after returning from Florence, whither he was obliged to go on some affairs, he would not fail her. And so, having come to Florence, where he applied himself with incredible labour to the studies of his art, he made the cartoon for that chapel, with the intention of going, as he did, as soon as the occasion might present itself, to put it into execution.

Before he left Perugia, Madonna Atalanta Baglioni asked him to paint a panel for her chapel in the Church of S. Francesco. However, since he couldn’t fulfill her request at that moment, he promised that after he returned from Florence, where he had to go for some business, he would make it happen. Once in Florence, he worked incredibly hard on his art studies and created the sketch for that chapel, intending to execute it as soon as the opportunity arose.

Angelo Doni.

RAFFAELLO DA URBINO: ANGELO DONI
(Florence: Pitti, 61. Panel)
View larger image

RAFFAELLO DA URBINO: ANGELO DONI
(Florence: Pitti, 61. Panel)
View larger image

While he was thus staying in Florence, Agnolo Doni—who was very [Pg 215] careful of his money in other things, but willing to spend it, although still with the greatest possible economy, on works of painting and sculpture, in which he much delighted—caused him to make portraits of himself and of his wife; and these may be seen, painted in his new manner, in the possession of Giovan Battista, his son, in the beautiful and most commodious house that the same Agnolo built on the Corso de' Tintori, near the Canto degli Alberti, in Florence. For Domenico Canigiani, also, he painted a picture of Our Lady, with the Child Jesus welcoming a little S. John brought to Him by S. Elizabeth, who, as she holds him, is gazing with a most animated expression at a S. Joseph, who is standing with both his hands leaning on a staff, and inclines his head towards her, as though praising the greatness of God and marvelling that she, so advanced in years, should have so young a child. And all appear to be amazed to see with how much feeling and reverence the two cousins, for all their tender age, are caressing one another; not to mention that every touch of colour in the heads, hands, and feet seems to be living flesh rather than a tint laid on by a master of that art. This most noble picture is now in the possession of the heirs of the said Domenico Canigiani, who hold it in the estimation that is due to a work by Raffaello da Urbino.

While he was staying in Florence, Agnolo Doni—who was very [Pg 215] careful with his money in other areas but willing to spend it, though still as economically as possible, on paintings and sculptures that he really enjoyed—had portraits made of himself and his wife; these can be seen, painted in his new style, in the possession of Giovan Battista, their son, in the beautiful and very comfortable house that Agnolo built on Corso de' Tintori, near Canto degli Alberti, in Florence. He also painted a picture of Our Lady for Domenico Canigiani, with the Child Jesus welcoming little St. John, who was brought to Him by St. Elizabeth. As she holds him, she looks with a very lively expression at St. Joseph, who stands with both hands resting on a staff, inclining his head toward her as if to praise the greatness of God and wonder that she, so advanced in age, has such a young child. Everyone seems amazed to see how much feeling and reverence the two cousins, despite their tender age, are showing to each other; not to mention that every touch of color in the heads, hands, and feet appears to be living flesh rather than simply paint applied by a master of that art. This exquisite painting is now in the possession of the heirs of Domenico Canigiani, who hold it in the esteem due to a work by Raffaello da Urbino.

This most excellent of painters studied in the city of Florence the old works of Masaccio; and what he saw in those of Leonardo and Michelagnolo made him give even greater attention to his studies, in consequence of which he effected an extraordinary improvement in his art and manner. While he was living in Florence, Raffaello, besides other friendships, became very intimate with Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco, being much pleased with his colouring, and taking no little pains to imitate it: and in return he taught that good father the principles of perspective, to which up to that time the monk had not given any attention.

This outstanding painter studied the old works of Masaccio in Florence, and what he observed in the works of Leonardo and Michelangelo motivated him to focus even more on his studies. As a result, he achieved an incredible improvement in his art and style. While living in Florence, Raphael became close friends with Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco, appreciating his coloring and making a significant effort to imitate it. In return, he taught the good monk the principles of perspective, which he had not considered until then.

But at the very height of this friendly intercourse, Raffaello was recalled to Perugia, where he began by finishing the work for the aforesaid Madonna Atalanta Baglioni in S. Francesco, for which, as has been related, he had made the cartoon in Florence. In this most divine picture there is a Dead Christ being borne to the Sepulchre, executed [Pg 216] with such freshness and such loving care, that it seems to the eye to have been only just painted. In the composition of this work, Raffaello imagined to himself the sorrow that the nearest and most affectionate relatives of the dead one feel in laying to rest the body of him who has been their best beloved, and on whom, in truth, the happiness, honour, and welfare of a whole family have depended. Our Lady is seen in a swoon; and the heads of all the figures are very gracious in their weeping, particularly that of S. John, who, with his hands clasped, bows his head in such a manner as to move the hardest heart to pity. And in truth, whoever considers the diligence, love, art, and grace shown by this picture, has great reason to marvel, for it amazes all who behold it, what with the air of the figures, the beauty of the draperies, and, in short, the supreme excellence that it reveals in every part.

But at the peak of this friendly interaction, Raffaello was called back to Perugia, where he started by finishing the work for the aforementioned Madonna Atalanta Baglioni in S. Francesco, for which, as previously mentioned, he had created the cartoon in Florence. In this incredibly divine painting, a Dead Christ is being carried to the tomb, executed [Pg 216] with such freshness and loving detail that it appears to have just been painted. In the composition of this piece, Raffaello envisioned the sorrow that the closest and most loving relatives of the deceased feel when laying to rest someone they dearly loved, on whom, in truth, the happiness, honor, and well-being of an entire family depended. Our Lady is seen in a faint; and the expressions of all the figures as they weep are very graceful, especially that of St. John, who, with his hands clasped, bows his head in such a way that it would move even the hardest heart to compassion. Indeed, anyone who considers the diligence, love, artistry, and grace displayed in this painting has every reason to be amazed, as it astounds all who see it with the expression of the figures, the beauty of the drapery, and, in short, the supreme excellence revealed in every detail.

The School of Athens.

"THE SCHOOL OF ATHENS"
(After the fresco by Raffaello da Urbino.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

"THE SCHOOL OF ATHENS"
(After the fresco by Raphael.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

This work finished, he returned to Florence, where he received from the Dei, citizens of that city, the commission for an altar-panel that was to be placed in their chapel in S. Spirito; and he began it, and brought the sketch very nearly to completion. At the same time he painted a picture that was afterwards sent to Siena, although, on the departure of Raffaello, it was left with Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, to the end that he might finish a piece of blue drapery that was wanting. This happened because Bramante da Urbino, who was in the service of Julius II, wrote to Raffaello, on account of his being distantly related to him and also his compatriot, that he had so wrought upon the Pope, who had caused some new rooms to be made (in the Vatican), that Raffaello would have a chance of showing his worth in them. This proposal pleased Raffaello: wherefore, abandoning his works in Florence, and leaving the panel for the Dei unfinished, in the state in which Messer Baldassarre da Pescia had it placed in the Pieve of his native city after the death of Raffaello, he betook himself to Rome. Having arrived there, he found that most of the rooms in the Palace had been painted, or were still being painted, by a number of masters. To be precise, he saw that there was one room in which a scene had been finished by Piero della Francesca; Luca da Cortona had brought one wall nearly to completion; and Don Pietro[25] [Pg 217] della Gatta, Abbot of S. Clemente at Arezzo, had begun some works there. Bramantino, the Milanese, had likewise painted many figures, which were mostly portraits from life, and were held to be very beautiful. After his arrival, therefore, having been received very warmly by Pope Julius, Raffaello began in the Camera della Segnatura a scene of the theologians reconciling Philosophy and Astrology with Theology: wherein are portraits of all the sages in the world, disputing in various ways. Standing apart are some astrologers, who have made various kinds of figures and characters of geomancy and astrology on some little tablets, which they send to the Evangelists by certain very beautiful angels; and these Evangelists are expounding them. Among them is Diogenes with his cup, lying on the steps, and lost in thought, a figure very well conceived, which, for its beauty and the characteristic negligence of its dress, is worthy to be extolled. There, also, are Aristotle and Plato, one with the Timæus in his hand, the other with the Ethics; and round them, in a circle, is a great school of philosophers. Nor is it possible to express the beauty of those astrologers and geometricians who are drawing a vast number of figures and characters with compasses on tablets: among whom, in the figure of a young man, shapely and handsome, who is throwing out his arms in admiration, and inclining his head, is the portrait of Federigo II, Duke of Mantua, who was then in Rome. There is also a figure that is stooping to the ground, holding in its hand a pair of compasses, with which it is making a circle on a tablet: this is said to be the architect Bramante, and it is no less the man himself than if he were alive, so well is it drawn. Beside a figure with its back turned and holding a globe of the heavens in its hand, is the portrait of Zoroaster; and next to him is Raffaello, the master of the work, who made his own portrait by means of a mirror, in a youthful head with an air of great modesty, filled with a pleasing and excellent grace, and wearing a black cap.

This work completed, he returned to Florence, where he was commissioned by the Dei, citizens of the city, to create an altar panel for their chapel in S. Spirito. He started the project and nearly finished the sketch. At the same time, he painted a picture that was later sent to Siena, though, after Raffaello's departure, it was left with Ridolfo Ghirlandajo to complete a blue drapery that was missing. This occurred because Bramante da Urbino, who worked for Julius II, wrote to Raffaello, being distantly related to him and also a fellow countryman, that he had convinced the Pope to create new rooms in the Vatican, which would give Raffaello a chance to showcase his talent. This suggestion appealed to Raffaello; thus, he left his projects in Florence, leaving the Dei's panel unfinished, as it was when Messer Baldassarre da Pescia had it placed in the Pieve of his hometown after Raffaello's death, and traveled to Rome. Upon arrival, he found that most of the rooms in the Palace had been painted or were still being painted by several masters. Specifically, he saw one room where Piero della Francesca had finished a scene; Luca da Cortona had nearly completed one wall; and Don Pietro della Gatta, Abbot of S. Clemente at Arezzo, had started some works. Bramantino from Milan had also painted many figures, mostly lifelike portraits, which were considered very beautiful. After his arrival, having been warmly welcomed by Pope Julius, Raffaello began a scene in the Camera della Segnatura depicting theologians reconciling Philosophy and Astrology with Theology, featuring portraits of all the world's philosophers engaging in various discussions. There were astrologers apart from the main group, creating different types of geomancy and astrology figures on small tablets, which they sent to the Evangelists through beautiful angels, who were explaining them. Among them was Diogenes with his cup, reclining on the steps, lost in thought—a well-conceived figure that, with its beauty and the intentional negligence of its attire, deserves praise. Also present were Aristotle and Plato, one holding the Timæus and the other the Ethics, surrounded in a circle by a large group of philosophers. The beauty of the astrologers and geometricians, who were drawing numerous figures and symbols with compasses on tablets, is beyond expression. Among them is a young man, well-formed and handsome, throwing out his arms in admiration and leaning his head, said to be the portrait of Federigo II, Duke of Mantua, who was in Rome at the time. There is also a figure bending down, holding a pair of compasses while making a circle on a tablet; this is said to be the architect Bramante, depicted so accurately it could be the man himself. Next to a figure with its back turned, holding a globe of the heavens, is the portrait of Zoroaster; and beside him is Raffaello, the master of the work, who painted his own portrait using a mirror, showing a youthful face with a modest demeanor, filled with pleasing grace, and wearing a black cap.

Nor is one able to describe the beauty and goodness that are to be seen in the heads and figures of the Evangelists, to whose countenances he gave an air of attention and intentness very true to life, and particularly in those who are writing. Thus, behind S. Matthew, who is copying [Pg 218] the characters from the tablet wherein are the figures (which is held before him by an angel), and writing them down in a book, he painted an old man who, having placed a piece of paper on his knee, is copying all that S. Matthew writes down; and while intent on his work in that uncomfortable position, he seems to twist his head and his jaws in time with the motion of the pen. And in addition to the details of the conceptions, which are numerous enough, there is the composition of the whole scene, which is truly arranged with so much order and proportion, that he may be said to have given therein such a proof of his powers as made men understand that he was resolved to hold the sovereignty, without question, among all who handled the brush.

It's not possible to fully describe the beauty and goodness visible in the faces and figures of the Evangelists, whose expressions he captured with a realistic sense of focus and intent, especially in those who are writing. Behind St. Matthew, who is copying [Pg 218] the characters from the tablet held in front of him by an angel and writing them down in a book, there's an old man who, having placed a piece of paper on his knee, is transcribing everything St. Matthew writes. While focused on his work in that uncomfortable position, he appears to twist his head and jaw in sync with the movement of the pen. Besides the numerous details of the subjects, the overall composition of the scene is arranged with such order and proportion that it showcases his skill, making it clear he was determined to establish himself as the undeniable master among all who wielded a brush.

He also adorned this work with a view in perspective and with many figures, executed in such a sweet and delicate manner, that Pope Julius was induced thereby to cause all the scenes of the other masters, both the old and the new, to be thrown to the ground, so that Raffaello alone might have the glory of all the labours that had been devoted to these works up to that time. The work of Giovanni Antonio Sodoma of Vercelli, which was above Raffaello's painting, was to be thrown down by order of the Pope; but Raffaello determined to make use of its compartments and grotesques. There were also some medallions, four in number, and in each of these he made a figure as a symbol of the scenes below, each figure being on the same side as the scene that it represented. Over the first scene, wherein he painted Philosophy, Astrology, Geometry, and Poetry making peace with Theology, is a woman representing Knowledge, who is seated on a throne that is supported on either side by a figure of the Goddess Cybele, each with those many breasts which in ancient times were the attributes of Diana Polymastes; and her dress is of four colours, standing for the four elements; from the head downwards there is the colour of fire, below the girdle that of the sky, from the groin to the knees there is the colour of earth, and the rest, down to the feet, is the colour of water. With her, also, are some truly beautiful little boys. In another medallion, on the side towards the window that looks over the Belvedere, is a figure of Poetry, who is in the form of Polyhymnia, crowned with laurel, and holds an antique musical instrument [Pg 219] in one hand, and a book in the other, and has her legs crossed. With a more than human beauty of expression in her countenance, she stands with her eyes uplifted towards Heaven, accompanied by two little boys, who are lively and spirited, and who make a group of beautiful variety both with her and with the others. On this side, over the aforesaid window, Raffaello afterwards painted Mount Parnassus. In the third medallion, which is above the scene where the Holy Doctors are ordaining the Mass, is a figure of Theology, no less beautiful than the others, with books and other things round her, and likewise accompanied by little boys. And in the fourth medallion, over the other window, which looks out on the court, he painted Justice with her scales, and her sword uplifted, and with the same little boys that are with the others; of which the effect is supremely beautiful, for in the scene on the wall below he depicted the giving of the Civil and the Canon Law, as we will relate in the proper place.

He also decorated this work with a perspective view and many figures, done in such a lovely and delicate way that Pope Julius was inspired to order the removal of all the scenes by other artists, both old and new, so that Raffaello alone could receive the glory for all the effort that had gone into these works up to that point. Giovanni Antonio Sodoma's work from Vercelli, which was above Raffaello's painting, was to be taken down by the Pope's command; however, Raffaello decided to incorporate its sections and grotesques. There were also four medallions, each featuring a figure symbolizing the scenes below, with each figure aligned with the scene it represented. Above the first scene, where he painted Philosophy, Astrology, Geometry, and Poetry reconciling with Theology, there's a woman representing Knowledge sitting on a throne supported on both sides by figures of the Goddess Cybele, each adorned with the many breasts that were once associated with Diana Polymastes; her dress features four colors representing the four elements: the color of fire from her head down to her waist, the color of the sky below the waist, the color of earth from her groin to her knees, and water from her knees to her feet. Accompanying her are some truly lovely little boys. In another medallion, facing the window looking over the Belvedere, is a figure of Poetry, depicted as Polyhymnia, crowned with laurel, holding an ancient musical instrument in one hand and a book in the other, her legs crossed. She has an expression of extraordinary beauty, stands with her eyes raised to Heaven, accompanied by two lively little boys, creating a beautiful and varied group alongside her and the others. On this side, above the mentioned window, Raffaello later painted Mount Parnassus. In the third medallion, above the scene where the Holy Doctors are ordaining the Mass, is a figure of Theology, equally as beautiful as the others, surrounded by books and other items and also accompanied by little boys. In the fourth medallion, above the other window that opens onto the courtyard, he painted Justice holding her scales and an uplifted sword, accompanied by the same little boys as the others; the effect is stunning, as in the scene on the wall below, he depicted the giving of Civil and Canon Law, which we will discuss in the appropriate place.

In like manner, on the same ceiling, in the angles of the pendentives, he executed four scenes which he drew and coloured with great diligence, but with figures of no great size. In one of these, that near the Theology, he painted the Sin of Adam, the eating of the apple, which he executed with a most delicate manner; and in the second, near the Astrology, is a figure of that science setting the fixed stars and planets in their places. In the next, that belonging to Mount Parnassus, is Marsyas, whom Apollo has caused to be bound to a tree and flayed; and on the side of the scene wherein the Decretals are given, there is the Judgment of Solomon, showing him proposing to have the child cut in half. These four scenes are all full of expression and feeling, and executed with excellent draughtsmanship, and with pleasing and gracious colouring.

Similarly, on the same ceiling, in the corners of the pendentives, he created four scenes that he sketched and painted with great care, though the figures are not very large. In one of these, near the Theology, he depicted the Sin of Adam, the eating of the apple, which he rendered in a very delicate way; in the second, near Astrology, there is a figure representing that science setting the fixed stars and planets in their proper places. In the next, associated with Mount Parnassus, is Marsyas, whom Apollo has tied to a tree and flayed; and on the side of the scene where the Decretals are given, there is the Judgment of Solomon, showing him suggesting to have the child cut in half. These four scenes are all full of emotion and expression, executed with excellent artistry, and feature pleasing and graceful coloring.

But now, having finished with the vaulting—that is, the ceiling—of that apartment, it remains for us to describe what he painted below the things mentioned above, wall by wall. On the wall towards the Belvedere, where there are Mount Parnassus and the Fount of Helicon, he made round that mount a laurel wood of darkest shadows, in the verdure of which one almost sees the leaves quivering in the gentle zephyrs; and in the air are vast numbers of naked Loves, most beautiful [Pg 220] in feature and expression, who are plucking branches of laurel and with them making garlands, which they throw and scatter about the mount. Over the whole, in truth, there seems to breathe a spirit of divinity, so beautiful are the figures, and such the nobility of the picture, which makes whoever studies it with attention marvel how a human brain, by the imperfect means of mere colours, and by excellence of draughtsmanship, could make painted things appear alive. Most lifelike, also, are those Poets who are seen here and there about the mount, some standing, some seated, some writing, and others discoursing, and others, again, singing or conversing together, in groups of four or six, according as it pleased him to distribute them. There are portraits from nature of all the most famous poets, ancient and modern, and some only just dead, or still living in his day; which were taken from statues or medals, and many from old pictures, and some, who were still alive, portrayed from the life by himself. And to begin with one end, there are Ovid, Virgil, Ennius, Tibullus, Catullus, Propertius, and Homer; the last-named, blind and chanting his verses with uplifted head, having at his feet one who is writing them down. Next, in a group, are all the nine Muses and Apollo, with such beauty in their aspect, and such divinity in the figures, that they breathe out a spirit of grace and life. There, also, are the learned Sappho, the most divine Dante, the gracious Petrarca, and the amorous Boccaccio, who are wholly alive, with Tibaldeo, and an endless number of other moderns; and this scene is composed with much grace, and executed with diligence.

But now that we've finished with the ceiling of that room, we need to describe what he painted on the walls below, wall by wall. On the wall facing the Belvedere, where you can see Mount Parnassus and the Fount of Helicon, he created a laurel grove of deep shadows around the mountain, where you can almost see the leaves trembling in the gentle breeze. In the air, there are many beautiful, naked Loves who are plucking laurel branches to make garlands, which they throw and scatter around the mountain. Over it all, there's a sense of divinity, as the figures are so beautiful and the painting so noble that anyone who studies it closely is left in awe of how a human mind, using just colors and excellent drawing skills, could make painted things look alive. The poets scattered around the mountain look very lifelike—some are standing, some sitting, some are writing, and others are talking or singing together in groups of four or six, depending on how he chose to arrange them. There are realistic portraits of the most famous poets, both ancient and modern, some who had just died and others still living in his time; these were taken from statues or medals, many from old paintings, and some from life by him. To start at one end, there are Ovid, Virgil, Ennius, Tibullus, Catullus, Propertius, and Homer, the last being blind and reciting his verses with his head held high, with someone writing them down at his feet. Next, there's a group of all nine Muses and Apollo, depicted with such beauty and divinity that they exude a spirit of grace and life. Among them are the learned Sappho, the divine Dante, the graceful Petrarca, and the romantic Boccaccio, all looking alive, along with Tibaldeo and countless other moderns, arranged with great elegance and executed with care.

On another wall he made a Heaven, with Christ, Our Lady, S. John the Baptist, the Apostles, the Evangelists, and the Martyrs, enthroned on clouds, with God the Father sending down the Holy Spirit over them all, and particularly over an endless number of saints, who are below, writing the Mass, and engaged in disputation about the Host, which is on the altar. Among these are the four Doctors of the Church, who have about them a vast number of saints, such as Dominic, Francis, Thomas Aquinas, Buonaventura, Scotus, and Nicholas of Lira, with Dante, Fra Girolamo Savonarola of Ferrara, and all the Christian theologians, with an infinite number of portraits from nature; and in the air [Pg 221] are four little children, who are holding open the Gospels. Anything more graceful or more perfect than these figures no painter could create, since those saints are represented as seated in the air, in a circle, and so well, that in truth, besides the appearance of life that the colouring gives them, they are foreshortened and made to recede in such a manner, that they would not be otherwise if they were in relief. Moreover, their vestments show a rich variety, with most beautiful folds in the draperies, and the expressions of the heads are more Divine than human; as may be seen in that of Christ, which reveals all the clemency and devoutness that Divinity can show to mortal men through the medium of painting. For Raffaello received from nature a particular gift of making the expressions of his heads very sweet and gracious; of which we have proof also in the Madonna, who, with her hands pressed to her bosom, gazing in contemplation upon her Son, seems incapable of refusing any favour; not to mention that he showed a truly beautiful sense of fitness, giving a look of age to the expressions of the Holy Patriarchs, simplicity to the Apostles, and faith to the Martyrs. Even more art and genius did he display in the holy Christian Doctors, in whose features, while they make disputation throughout the scene in groups of six or three or two, there may be seen a kind of eagerness and distress in seeking to find the truth of that which is in question, revealing this by gesticulating with their hands, making various movements of their persons, turning their ears to listen, knitting their brows, and expressing astonishment in many different ways, all truly well varied and appropriate; save only the four Doctors of the Church, who, illumined by the Holy Spirit, are unravelling and expounding, by means of the Holy Scriptures, all the problems of the Gospels, which are held up by those little boys who have them in their hands as they hover in the air.

On another wall, he created a Heaven, with Christ, Our Lady, Saint John the Baptist, the Apostles, the Evangelists, and the Martyrs, all seated on clouds, while God the Father sends down the Holy Spirit over them all, especially over countless saints below, who are writing the Mass and debating the Host on the altar. Among them are the four Doctors of the Church, surrounded by many saints like Dominic, Francis, Thomas Aquinas, Bonaventure, Scotus, and Nicholas of Lyra, along with Dante, Fra Girolamo Savonarola from Ferrara, and all the Christian theologians, alongside a vast number of lifelike portraits; in the air, [Pg 221], four little children are holding open the Gospels. No painter could create figures more graceful or perfect than these, as the saints are portrayed seated in a circle in the air, so well that, aside from the lifelike appearance given by the coloring, they are foreshortened and positioned to appear distant, as they would be if they were in relief. Moreover, their garments show a rich variety, with beautiful folds in the draperies, and their expressions are more divine than human; Christ's expression, for example, reveals all the kindness and devotion that divinity can convey to mortals through painting. Raffaello had a special gift from nature for capturing sweet and gracious expressions in his figures, which is also evident in the Madonna, who, with her hands pressed to her chest and gazing contemplatively at her Son, appears incapable of refusing any favor; not to mention that he had a truly beautiful sense of appropriateness, giving age to the expressions of the Holy Patriarchs, simplicity to the Apostles, and faith to the Martyrs. He displayed even more artistry and genius in the holy Christian Doctors, whose features, while they are engaged in discussion in groups of six, three, or two, show a kind of eagerness and distress as they seek to uncover the truth of what they are debating, revealing this through hand gestures, various body movements, attentively leaning in to listen, furrowing their brows, and expressing astonishment in many varied and fitting ways; except for the four Doctors of the Church, who, illuminated by the Holy Spirit, are unraveling and explaining, through the Holy Scriptures, all the issues in the Gospels, which are held up by the boys who grasp them as they hover in the air.

On another wall, where the other window is, on one side, he painted Justinian giving the Laws to the Doctors to be revised; and above this, Temperance, Fortitude, and Prudence. On the other side he painted the Pope giving the Canonical Decretals; for which Pope he made a portrait from life of Pope Julius, and, beside him, Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici, who became Pope Leo, Cardinal Antonio di Monte, and Cardinal [Pg 222] Alessandro Farnese, who afterwards became Pope Paul III, with other portraits.

On another wall, where the other window is, on one side, he painted Justinian handing over the Laws to the Doctors for revision; above this, he painted Temperance, Fortitude, and Prudence. On the other side, he depicted the Pope presenting the Canonical Decretals; for this, he made a portrait from life of Pope Julius, and next to him, Cardinal Giovanni de' Medici, who later became Pope Leo, Cardinal Antonio di Monte, and Cardinal [Pg 222] Alessandro Farnese, who afterwards became Pope Paul III, along with other portraits.

The Pope was very well satisfied with this work; and in order to make the panelling worthy of the paintings, he sent to Monte Oliveto di Chiusuri, a place in the territory of Siena, for Fra Giovanni da Verona, a great master at that time of perspective-views in inlaid woodwork, who made there not only the panelling right round, but also very beautiful doors and seats, wrought with perspective-views, which brought him great favour, rewards, and honour from the Pope. And it is certain that in that craft there was never any man more able than Giovanni, either in design or in workmanship: of which we still have proof in the Sacristy, wrought most beautifully with perspective-views in woodwork, of S. Maria in Organo in his native city of Verona, in the choir of Monte Oliveto di Chiusuri and that of S. Benedetto at Siena, in the Sacristy of Monte Oliveto at Naples, and also in the choir of the Chapel of Paolo da Tolosa in the same place, executed by that master. Wherefore he well deserved to be esteemed and held in very great honour by the convent of his Order, in which he died at the age of sixty-eight, in the year 1537. Of him, as of a person truly excellent and rare, I have thought it right to make mention, believing that this was due to his talents, which, as will be related in another place, led to many beautiful works being made by other masters after him.

The Pope was very pleased with this work. To ensure the paneling matched the quality of the paintings, he sent for Fra Giovanni da Verona from Monte Oliveto di Chiusuri, a place in the Siena area. At that time, Giovanni was a master in creating perspective views in inlaid woodwork. He not only created the paneling all around but also crafted stunning doors and seats, intricately designed with perspective views, earning him a lot of favor, rewards, and respect from the Pope. It’s clear that in this craft, there was no one more skilled than Giovanni, both in design and craftsmanship. We still see proof of this in the Sacristy, beautifully made with perspective views in woodwork, at S. Maria in Organo in his hometown of Verona, in the choir of Monte Oliveto di Chiusuri, and that of S. Benedetto in Siena, as well as in the Sacristy of Monte Oliveto in Naples, and the choir of the Chapel of Paolo da Tolosa in the same city, all executed by him. Thus, he truly deserved to be respected and held in high honor by his Order, where he passed away at the age of sixty-eight in 1537. I felt it was important to mention him as someone truly exceptional and rare, believing this acknowledgment was warranted due to his talents, which, as will be noted elsewhere, inspired many beautiful works by other masters after him.

The Disputa Del Sacramento.

THE "DISPUTA DEL SACRAMENTO"
(After the fresco by Raffaello da Urbino.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

THE "DISPUTA DEL SACRAMENTO"
(After the fresco by Raffaello da Urbino.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

But to return to Raffaello; his powers grew in such a manner, that he was commissioned by the Pope to go on to paint a second room, that near the Great Hall. And at this time, when he had gained a very great name, he also made a portrait of Pope Julius in a picture in oils, so true and so lifelike, that the portrait caused all who saw it to tremble, as if it had been the living man himself. This work is now in S. Maria del Popolo, together with a very beautiful picture of Our Lady, painted at the same time by the same master, and containing the Nativity of Jesus Christ, wherein is the Virgin laying a veil over her Son, whose beauty is such, both in the air of the head and in all the members, as to show that He is the true Son of God. And no less beautiful than the Child is the Madonna, in whom, besides her supreme loveliness, there may be seen [Pg 223] piety and gladness. There is also a Joseph, who, leaning with both his hands on a staff, and lost in thoughtful contemplation of the King and Queen of Heaven, gazes with the adoration of a most saintly old man. Both these pictures are exhibited on days of solemn festival.

But back to Raffaello; his skills increased so much that the Pope commissioned him to paint a second room near the Great Hall. At this time, after he had gained great fame, he also created a portrait of Pope Julius in oils, so realistic and lifelike that anyone who saw it felt as if they were looking at the living man himself. This painting is now in S. Maria del Popolo, along with a beautiful picture of Our Lady, also painted at the same time by the same artist, depicting the Nativity of Jesus Christ. In it, the Virgin is laying a veil over her Son, whose beauty in both his features and demeanor clearly shows that He is the true Son of God. The Madonna is equally beautiful, radiating supreme loveliness, along with piety and joy. There is also a Joseph, who leans on his staff, lost in deep thought as he gazes at the King and Queen of Heaven, showing the adoration of a very saintly old man. Both of these paintings are displayed on special feast days.

By this time Raffaello had acquired much fame in Rome; but, although his manner was graceful and held by all to be very beautiful, and despite the fact that he had seen so many antiquities in that city, and was for ever studying, nevertheless he had not yet given thereby to his figures that grandeur and majesty which he gave to them from that time onward. For it happened in those days that Michelagnolo made the terrifying outburst against the Pope in the chapel, of which we will speak in his Life; whence he was forced to fly to Florence. Whereupon Bramante, having the keys of the chapel, allowed Raffaello, who was his friend, to see it, to the end that he might be able to learn the methods of Michelagnolo. And the sight of it was the reason that Raffaello straightway repainted, although he had already finished it, the Prophet Isaiah that is to be seen in S. Agostino at Rome, above the S. Anne by Andrea Sansovino; in which work, by means of what he had seen of Michelagnolo's painting, he made the manner immeasurably better and more grand, and gave it greater majesty. Wherefore Michelagnolo, on seeing afterwards the work of Raffaello, thought, as was the truth, that Bramante had done him that wrong on purpose in order to bring profit and fame to Raffaello.

By this time, Raffaello had gained a lot of fame in Rome. Even though his style was graceful and everyone considered it very beautiful, and despite the fact that he had seen many ancient works in the city and was constantly studying, he still hadn’t given his figures the grandeur and majesty that he would later achieve. During that time, Michelangelo had a huge outburst against the Pope in the chapel, which we will discuss in his biography; as a result, he had to flee to Florence. Then, Bramante, who had the keys to the chapel, allowed Raffaello, a friend of his, to see it so that he could learn Michelangelo’s techniques. This experience led Raffaello to repaint the already completed Prophet Isaiah, which can be seen in S. Agostino in Rome, above S. Anne by Andrea Sansovino. Inspired by what he saw in Michelangelo's work, he significantly improved the style and made it more grand and majestic. When Michelangelo later saw Raffaello's work, he honestly thought that Bramante had intentionally done him a disservice to benefit and bring fame to Raffaello.

Not long after this, Agostino Chigi, a very rich merchant of Siena, who was much the friend of every man of excellence, gave Raffaello the commission to paint a chapel; and this he did because a short time before Raffaello had painted for him in his softest manner, in a loggia of his palace, now called the Chigi, in the Trastevere, a Galatea in a car on the sea drawn by two dolphins, and surrounded by Tritons and many sea-gods. Raffaello, then, having made the cartoon for that chapel, which is at the entrance of the Church of S. Maria della Pace, on the right hand as one goes into the church by the principal door, executed it in fresco, in his new manner, which was no little grander and more magnificent than his earlier manner. In this painting Raffaello depicted [Pg 224] some Prophets and Sibyls, before Michelagnolo's chapel had been thrown open to view, although he had seen it; and in truth it is held to be the best of his works, and the most beautiful among so many that are beautiful, for in the women and children that are in it, there may be seen a marvellous vivacity and perfect colouring. And this work caused him to be greatly esteemed both in his lifetime and after his death, being the rarest and most excellent that Raffaello executed in all his life.

Not long after this, Agostino Chigi, a very wealthy merchant from Siena who was friends with every notable person, commissioned Raffaello to paint a chapel. He did this because a little earlier, Raffaello had created a beautiful painting for him in a loggia of his palace, now known as the Chigi, in Trastevere, depicting Galatea in a sea chariot pulled by two dolphins, surrounded by Tritons and various sea gods. Raffaello then made the cartoon for that chapel, located at the entrance of the Church of S. Maria della Pace, to the right as you enter through the main door, and executed it in fresco, using his new style, which was significantly grander and more magnificent than his earlier work. In this painting, Raffaello depicted [Pg 224] some Prophets and Sibyls, before Michelagnolo's chapel had been unveiled, even though he had seen it. This work is considered his best and the most beautiful among many beautiful pieces because of the remarkable liveliness and perfect color in the women and children featured in it. This masterpiece earned him great respect both during his lifetime and after his death, being one of the rarest and most exceptional works Raffaello produced throughout his career.

Next, spurred by the entreaties of a Chamberlain of Pope Julius, he painted the panel for the high-altar of the Araceli, wherein he made a Madonna in the sky, with a most beautiful landscape, a S. John, a S. Francis, and a S. Jerome represented as a Cardinal; in which Madonna may be seen a humility and a modesty truly worthy of the Mother of Christ; and besides the beautiful gesture of the Child as He plays with His Mother's hand, there is revealed in S. John that penitential air which fasting generally gives, while his head displays the sincerity of soul and frank assurance appropriate to those who live away from the world and despise it, and, in their dealings with mankind, make war on falsehood and speak out the truth. In like manner, the S. Jerome has his head uplifted with his eyes on the Madonna, deep in contemplation; and in them seem to be suggested all the learning and knowledge that he showed in his writings, while with both his hands he is presenting the Chamberlain, in the act of recommending him to her; which portrait of the Chamberlain is as lifelike as any ever painted. Nor did Raffaello fail to do as well in the figure of S. Francis, who, kneeling on the ground, with one arm outstretched, and with his head upraised, is gazing up at the Madonna, glowing with a love in tone with the feeling of the picture, which, both by the lineaments and by the colouring, shows him melting with affection, and taking comfort and life from the gracious sight of her beauty and of the vivacity and beauty of her Son. In the middle of the panel, below the Madonna, Raffaello made a little boy standing, who is raising his head towards her and holding an inscription: than whom none better or more graceful could be painted, what with the beauty of his features and the proportionate loveliness of his person. And in addition there is a landscape, which is singularly beautiful in its absolute perfection.

Next, encouraged by the requests of a Chamberlain of Pope Julius, he painted the altarpiece for the Araceli, featuring a Madonna in the sky, a stunning landscape, a St. John, a St. Francis, and a St. Jerome depicted as a Cardinal. In this Madonna, you can see a humility and modesty truly befitting the Mother of Christ. Along with the lovely gesture of the Child playing with His Mother's hand, St. John reveals that reflective quality typical of someone who fasts, while his expression shows the sincerity and confidence of those who live apart from the world, rejecting it, and who fight against falsehood while speaking the truth. Similarly, St. Jerome has his head lifted, eyes fixed on the Madonna, lost in contemplation; in him is reflected all the learning and knowledge he expressed in his writings, as he presents the Chamberlain to her with both hands, and his likeness is as true to life as any ever painted. Raffaello also excelled with St. Francis, who, kneeling on the ground with one arm outstretched and head raised, gazes up at the Madonna, filled with love that resonates with the feeling of the piece, showing him melting with affection and drawing comfort and life from her beauty and the liveliness of her Son. In the center of the panel, below the Madonna, Raffaello painted a little boy standing, raising his head toward her while holding an inscription; none more beautiful or graceful could be painted, given the attractiveness of his features and the balanced loveliness of his form. Additionally, there is a landscape that is exceptionally beautiful in its perfect detail.

The Mass of Bolsena.

THE MASS OF BOLSENA
(After the fresco by Raffaello da Urbino.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

THE MASS OF BOLSENA
(After the fresco by Raphael.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

[Pg 225] Afterwards, going on with the apartments of the Palace, he painted a scene of the Miracle of the Sacramental Corporal of Orvieto, or of Bolsena, whichever it may be called. In this scene there may be perceived in the face of the priest who is saying Mass, which is glowing with a blush, the shame that he felt on seeing the Host turned into blood on the Corporal on account of his unbelief. With terror in his eyes, dumbfoundered and beside himself in the presence of his hearers, he seems like one who knows not what to do; and in the gesture of his hands may almost be seen the fear and trembling that a man would feel in such a case. Round him Raffaello made many figures, all varied and different, some serving the Mass, others kneeling on a flight of steps; and all, bewildered by the strangeness of the event, are making various most beautiful movements and gestures, while in many, both men and women, there is revealed a belief that they are to blame. Among the women is one who is seated on the ground at the foot of the scene, holding a child in her arms; and she, hearing the account that another appears to be giving her of the thing that has happened to the priest, turns in a marvellous manner as she listens to this, with a womanly grace that is very natural and lifelike. On the other side he painted Pope Julius hearing that Mass, a most marvellous work, wherein he made a portrait of Cardinal di San Giorgio, with innumerable others; and the window-opening he turned to advantage by making a flight of steps, in such a way that all the painting seems to be one whole: nay, it appears as if, were that window-space not there, the work would in nowise have been complete. Wherefore it may be truly credited to him that in the invention and composition of every kind of painted story, no one has ever been more dexterous, facile, and able than Raffaello.

[Pg 225] Later, continuing with the apartments in the Palace, he painted a scene of the Miracle of the Sacramental Corporal of Orvieto, or Bolsena, depending on what you want to call it. In this scene, you can see the shame on the face of the priest saying Mass, his cheeks flushed, as he witnesses the Host turning into blood on the Corporal due to his lack of faith. With terror in his eyes, utterly shocked and at a loss in front of his congregation, he seems unsure of what to do; and you can almost see the fear and trembling in his hands as he reacts to the situation. Around him, Raffaello included numerous figures, all unique and diverse, some assisting with the Mass, others kneeling on steps; all of them, bewildered by the oddity of the event, are making various stunning movements and gestures, and many, both men and women, seem to feel a sense of guilt. Among the women, one sits on the ground at the base of the scene, holding a child in her arms; she, hearing what another is telling her about what has happened to the priest, turns to listen in a wonderfully graceful way that feels very natural and lifelike. On the other side, he painted Pope Julius attending the Mass, a remarkable work, in which he included a portrait of Cardinal di San Giorgio along with many others; and he effectively utilized the window space by incorporating a flight of steps, making the entire painting seem like one cohesive piece: in fact, it appears that without that window opening, the artwork would not feel complete. Thus, it can truly be said that in the creation and composition of every kind of painted narrative, no one has ever been more skilled, talented, and capable than Raffaello.

This he also proved in another scene in the same place, opposite to the last-named, of S. Peter in the hands of Herod, and guarded in prison by men-at-arms; wherein he showed such a grasp of architecture, and such judgment in the buildings of the prison, that in truth the others after him seem to have more confusion than he has beauty. For he was ever seeking to represent stories just as they are written, and to paint in them things gracious and excellent; as is proved in this one by the [Pg 226] horror of the prison, wherein that old man is seen bound in chains of iron between the two men-at-arms, by the deep slumber of the guards, and by the dazzling splendour of the Angel, which, in the thick darkness of the night, reveals with its light every detail of the prison, and makes the arms of the soldiers shine resplendent, in such a way that their burnished lustre seems more lifelike than if they were real, although they are only painted. No less art and genius are there in the action of S. Peter, when, freed from his chains, he goes forth from the prison, accompanied by the Angel, wherein one sees in the face of the Saint a belief that it is rather a dream than a reality; and so, also, terror and dismay are shown in some other armed guards without the prison, who hear the noise of the iron door, while a sentinel with a torch in his hand rouses the others, and, as he gives them light with it, the blaze of the torch is reflected in all their armour; and all that its glow does not reach is illumined by the light of the moon. This composition Raffaello painted over the window, where the wall is darkest; and thus, when you look at the picture, the light strikes you in the face, and the real light conflicts so well with the different lights of the night in the painting, that the smoke of the torch, the splendour of the Angel, and the thick darkness of the night seem to you to be wholly real and natural, and you would never say that it was all painted, so vividly did he express this difficult conception. In it are seen shadows playing on the armour, other shadows projected, reflections, and a vaporous glare from the lights, all executed with darkest shade, and so well, that it may be truly said that he was the master of every other master; and as an effect of night, among all those that painting has ever produced, this is the most real and most divine, and is held by all the world to be the rarest.

This was also demonstrated in another scene in the same location, opposite the previous one, depicting Saint Peter in the hands of Herod, guarded in prison by soldiers. Here, he displayed such a mastery of architecture and such skilled judgment in designing the prison that, in truth, others that came after him seem more chaotic than he does beautiful. He always aimed to represent stories exactly as they are written and to paint them with grace and excellence; this is evident in the terrifying atmosphere of the prison, where the old man is seen chained in iron between the two soldiers, the deep sleep of the guards, and the dazzling brightness of the Angel, which illuminates every detail of the prison in the thick darkness of the night and makes the soldiers' armor shine so brilliantly that its luster appears more lifelike than if it were actual, although it's just a painting. The action of Saint Peter, as he walks out of the prison freed from his chains, accompanied by the Angel, reflects an expression on the Saint's face that suggests he believes it is more of a dream than reality; meanwhile, the fear and shock are captured in the expressions of other armed guards outside the prison who hear the noise of the iron door while a sentinel with a torch in hand awakens the others. As he uses the torch to provide light, its flame reflects off their armor, and everything the torchlight doesn't reach is illuminated by the moonlight. Raffaello painted this composition above the window, where the wall is the darkest; thus, when you view the painting, the light hits you directly, and the real light interacts so beautifully with the various lights of the night in the artwork that the smoke from the torch, the brightness of the Angel, and the deep darkness of the night all seem completely real and natural, making you believe it isn't just a painting, as he expressed this challenging idea with such vividness. You can see shadows dancing on the armor, other shadows being cast, reflections, and a misty glow from the lights, all rendered with deep shades, so well that it can truly be said that he outmasters every other master; and among all the effects of night that art has ever produced, this is the most realistic and divine, and it is regarded by everyone as one of the rarest.

On one of the unbroken walls, also, he painted the Divine Worship and the Ark of the Hebrews, with the Candlestick; and likewise Pope Julius driving Avarice out of the Temple, a scene as beautiful and as excellent as the Night described above. Here, in some bearers who are carrying Pope Julius, a most lifelike figure, in his chair, are portraits of men who were living at that time. And while the people, some women among them, are making way for the Pope, so that he may pass, one sees [Pg 227] the furious onset of an armed man on horseback, who, accompanied by two on foot, and in an attitude of the greatest fierceness, is smiting and riding down the proud Heliodorus, who is seeking, at the command of Antiochus, to rob the Temple of all the wealth stored for the widows and orphans. Already the riches and treasures could be seen being removed and taken away, when, on account of the terror of the strange misfortune of Heliodorus, so rudely struck down and smitten by the three figures mentioned above (although, this being a vision, they are seen and heard by him alone), behold, they are all dropped and upset on the ground, those who were carrying them falling down through the sudden terror and panic that had come upon all the following of Heliodorus. Apart from these may be seen the holy Onias, the High Priest, dressed in his robes of office, with his eyes and hands raised to Heaven, and praying most fervently, being seized with pity for the poor innocents who were thus nearly losing their possessions, and rejoicing at the help that he feels has come down from on high. Besides this, through a beautiful fancy of Raffaello's, one sees many who have climbed on to the socles of the column-bases, and, clasping the shafts, stand looking in most uncomfortable attitudes; with a throng of people showing their amazement in many various ways, and awaiting the result of this event.

On one of the intact walls, he painted the Divine Worship and the Ark of the Hebrews, complete with the Candlestick; he also depicted Pope Julius driving Avarice out of the Temple, a scene as beautiful and impressive as the Night mentioned earlier. Here, in the group of people carrying Pope Julius, who has been rendered in a very lifelike manner in his chair, are portraits of men who were alive at that time. As people, including some women, are clearing a path for the Pope to pass, one can see [Pg 227] the fierce attack of an armed man on horseback, who, accompanied by two on foot and looking extremely aggressive, is attacking the proud Heliodorus, who is attempting, by the order of Antiochus, to steal the wealth meant for the widows and orphans stored in the Temple. The riches and treasures were already visible as they were being taken away when, due to the shock of the strange misfortune befalling Heliodorus, suddenly struck down by the three figures mentioned earlier (though, since this is a vision, he sees and hears only them), all the treasures are dropped and scattered on the ground, causing those who carried them to fall in the sudden fear and panic that overwhelmed Heliodorus’s followers. Among them, the holy Onias, the High Priest, can be seen dressed in his priestly robes, with his eyes and hands raised to Heaven, praying fervently, filled with compassion for the innocent people who were about to lose their possessions, and rejoicing at the help he believes has come down from above. Additionally, thanks to Raffaello’s imaginative touch, one can see many people who have climbed onto the bases of the columns, grasping the pillars and standing in very uncomfortable positions, with a crowd displaying their amazement in various ways, waiting to see what happens next.

This work is in every part so stupendous, that even the cartoons are held in the greatest veneration; wherefore Messer Francesco Masini, a gentleman of Cesena—who, without the help of any master, but giving his attention by himself from his earliest childhood, guided by an extraordinary instinct of nature, to drawing and painting, has painted pictures that have been much extolled by good judges of art—possesses, among his many drawings and some ancient reliefs in marble, certain pieces of the cartoon which Raffaello made for this story of Heliodorus, and he holds them in the estimation that they truly deserve. Nor will I refrain from saying that Messer Niccolò Masini, who has given me information about these matters, is as much a true lover of our arts as he is a man of real culture in all other things.

This work is truly impressive in every way that even the sketches are highly respected. Therefore, Messer Francesco Masini, a gentleman from Cesena—who, without any formal training and guided solely by an extraordinary natural talent for drawing and painting since childhood—has created artworks that are highly praised by knowledgeable art critics. He owns, among his many drawings and some ancient marble reliefs, certain pieces of the sketch that Raffaello made for the story of Heliodorus, and he values them as they deserve. I must also mention that Messer Niccolò Masini, who has informed me about these matters, is as much a genuine enthusiast of our arts as he is a well-cultured individual in all other areas.

But to return to Raffaello; on the ceiling above these works, he then executed four scenes, God appearing to Abraham and promising him the [Pg 228] multiplication of his seed, the Sacrifice of Isaac, Jacob's Ladder, and the Burning Bush of Moses: wherein may be recognized no less art, invention, draughtsmanship, and grace, than in the other works that he painted.

But back to Raffaello; on the ceiling above these works, he created four scenes: God appearing to Abraham and promising him the [Pg 228] multiplication of his descendants, the Sacrifice of Isaac, Jacob's Ladder, and Moses' Burning Bush. Here, you can see just as much skill, creativity, drawing ability, and elegance as in the other pieces he painted.

While the happy genius of this craftsman was producing such marvels, the envy of fortune cut short the life of Julius II, who had fostered such abilities, and had been a lover of every excellent work. Whereupon a new Pope was elected in Leo X, who desired that the work begun should be carried on; and Raffaello thereby soared with his genius into the heavens, and received endless favours from him, fortunate in having come upon a Prince so great, who had by the inheritance of blood a strong inclination for such an art. Raffaello, therefore, thus encouraged to pursue the work, painted on the other wall the Coming of Attila to Rome, and his encounter at the foot of Monte Mario with Leo III, who drove him away with his mere benediction. In this scene Raffaello made S. Peter and S. Paul in the air, with swords in their hands, coming to defend the Church; and while the story of Leo III says nothing of this, nevertheless it was thus that he chose to represent it, perchance out of fancy, for it often happens that painters, like poets, go straying from their subject in order to make their work the more ornate, although their digressions are not such as to be out of harmony with their first intention. In those Apostles may be seen that celestial wrath and ardour which the Divine Justice is wont often to impart to the features of its ministers, charged with defending the most holy Faith; and of this we have proof in Attila, who is to be seen riding a black horse with white feet and a star on its forehead, as beautiful as it could be, for in an attitude of the utmost terror he throws up his head and turns his body in flight. There are other most beautiful horses, particularly a dappled jennet, which is ridden by a figure that has all the body covered with scales after the manner of a fish; which is copied from the Column of Trajan, wherein the figures have armour of that kind; and it is thought that such armour is made from the skins of crocodiles. There is Monte Mario, all aflame, showing that when soldiers march away, their quarters are always left a prey to fire. He made portraits from nature, also, in some mace-bearers accompanying the Pope, who are marvellously lifelike, as are the horses [Pg 229] on which they are riding; and the same is true of the retinue of Cardinals, and of some grooms who are holding the palfrey on which rides the Pope in full pontificals (a portrait of Leo X, no less lifelike than those of the others), with many courtiers; the whole being a most pleasing spectacle and well in keeping with such a work, and also very useful to our art, particularly for those who have no such objects at their command.

While the talented craftsman was creating such wonders, misfortune cut short the life of Julius II, who had nurtured such talent and appreciated every exquisite piece of work. A new Pope, Leo X, was elected, wanting the ongoing project to continue; and Raffaello then soared with his creativity into the heavens, receiving countless favors from him, lucky to have found such a great Prince who had a natural affinity for this art due to his noble heritage. Encouraged to continue, Raffaello painted on the other wall the Coming of Attila to Rome, depicting his encounter at the base of Monte Mario with Leo III, who sent him away with just a blessing. In this scene, Raffaello illustrated St. Peter and St. Paul in the sky, armed with swords, coming to defend the Church; and although the story of Leo III doesn't mention this, he chose to represent it that way, perhaps out of imagination, since painters, like poets, often wander from their themes to embellish their work, even if their digressions harmonize with their original intent. In those Apostles, one can see the divine anger and zeal that Divine Justice often imparts to its ministers, who are tasked with defending the most sacred Faith; and we see this in Attila, riding a stunning black horse with white feet and a star on its forehead, who, in a state of sheer terror, raises his head and turns away in flight. There are other beautiful horses, especially a dappled mare, ridden by a figure whose entire body is covered with scales like a fish; this detail is inspired by the Column of Trajan, where figures are depicted in such armor thought to be made from crocodile skin. Monte Mario is in flames, illustrating that when soldiers retreat, their camps are often left vulnerable to fire. He also created lifelike portraits of some mace-bearers accompanying the Pope, which are incredibly realistic, as are the horses on which they ride; the same applies to the Cardinals’ entourage and some grooms holding the saddle horse for the Pope in full regalia (a portrait of Leo X, just as lifelike as the others), along with many courtiers; the entire scene is a delightful spectacle, perfectly suited to such a work, and also very beneficial to our art, especially for those who don’t have access to such subjects. [Pg 229]

At this same time he painted a panel containing Our Lady, S. Jerome robed as a Cardinal, and an Angel Raphael accompanying Tobias, which was placed in S. Domenico at Naples, in that chapel wherein is the Crucifix that spoke to S. Thomas Aquinas. For Signor Leonello da Carpi, Lord of Meldola, who is still alive, although more than ninety years old, he executed a picture that was most marvellous in colouring, and of a singular beauty, for it is painted with such force, and also with a delicacy so pleasing, that I do not think it is possible to do better. In the countenance of the Madonna may be seen such a divine air, and in her attitude such a dignity, that no one would be able to improve her; and he made her with the hands clasped, adoring her Son, who is seated on her knees, caressing a S. John, a little boy, who is adoring Him, in company with S. Elizabeth and Joseph. This picture was once in the possession of the very reverend Cardinal da Carpi, the son of the said Signor Leonello, and a great lover of our arts; and it should be at the present day in the hands of his heirs.

At this time, he painted a panel featuring Our Lady, St. Jerome dressed as a Cardinal, and the Angel Raphael with Tobias, which was installed in St. Domenico in Naples, in the chapel that has the Crucifix that spoke to St. Thomas Aquinas. For Signor Leonello da Carpi, the Lord of Meldola, who is still alive at over ninety years old, he created a remarkably beautiful painting with incredible colors. It is executed with such strength and a pleasing delicacy that I believe it couldn't be improved upon. The Madonna's face has such a divine expression, and her pose carries such dignity that no one could enhance it. She is depicted with her hands clasped, worshipping her Son, who is seated on her lap, gently touching a young St. John, who is also adoring Him, alongside St. Elizabeth and Joseph. This painting was once owned by the very reverend Cardinal da Carpi, the son of Signor Leonello, a great patron of the arts, and it should currently be with his heirs.

Afterwards, Lorenzo Pucci, Cardinal of Santi Quattro, having been created Grand Penitentiary, Raffaello was favoured by him with a commission to paint a panel for S. Giovanni in Monte at Bologna, which is now set up in the chapel wherein lies the body of the Blessed Elena dall' Olio: in which work it is evident how much grace, in company with art, could accomplish by means of the delicate hands of Raffaello. In it is a S. Cecilia, who, entranced by a choir of angels on high, stands listening to the sound, wholly absorbed in the harmony; and in her countenance is seen that abstraction which is found in the faces of those who are in ecstasy. Scattered about the ground, moreover, are musical instruments, which have the appearance of being, not painted, but real and true; and such, also, are some veils that she is wearing, with vestments woven in [Pg 230] silk and gold, and, below these, a marvellous hair-shirt. And in a S. Paul, who has the right arm leaning on his naked sword, and the head resting on the hand, one sees his profound air of knowledge, no less well expressed than the transformation of his pride of aspect into dignity. He is clothed in a simple red garment by way of mantle, below which is a green tunic, after the manner of the Apostles, and his feet are bare. There is also S. Mary Magdalene, who is holding in her hands a most delicate vase of stone, in an attitude of marvellous grace; turning her head, she seems full of joy at her conversion; and indeed, in that kind of painting, I do not think that anything better could be done. Very beautiful, likewise, are the heads of S. Augustine and S. John the Evangelist. Of a truth, other pictures may be said to be pictures, but those of Raffaello life itself, for in his figures the flesh quivers, the very breath may be perceived, the pulse beats, and the true presentment of life is seen in them; on which account this picture gave him, in addition to the fame that he had already, an even greater name. Wherefore many verses were written in his honour, both Latin and in the vulgar tongue, of which, in order not to make my story longer than I have set out to do, I will cite only the following:

Afterwards, Lorenzo Pucci, Cardinal of Santi Quattro, became the Grand Penitentiary and commissioned Raffaello to paint a panel for S. Giovanni in Monte in Bologna, which is now displayed in the chapel where the body of Blessed Elena dall' Olio rests. In this work, it's clear how much grace and artistry combined through Raffaello's delicate touch. Featured is St. Cecilia, captivated by a choir of angels above, listening intently to the music, completely absorbed in the harmony; her face shows the kind of rapture found in those experiencing ecstasy. Scattered on the ground are musical instruments that appear to be real rather than painted, as well as some veils she wears, with garments woven in [Pg 230] silk and gold, along with a remarkable hair-shirt underneath. St. Paul is depicted with his right arm resting on his naked sword and his head propped on his hand, conveying a deep sense of knowledge, skillfully transforming his proud demeanor into one of dignity. He wears a simple red mantle over a green tunic, typical of the Apostles, and his feet are bare. There’s also St. Mary Magdalene, gracefully holding a delicate stone vase in her hands; as she turns her head, she radiates joy at her conversion. Truly, I don't think anything better could be achieved in this style of painting. The faces of St. Augustine and St. John the Evangelist are also remarkably beautiful. While other artworks may be called pictures, Raffaello's works embody life itself; in his figures, the flesh seems to tremble, one can sense the breath, the pulse pulses, and the essence of life is vividly present. Because of this, this painting not only enhanced his existing fame but also established an even greater reputation for him. Consequently, many verses were written in his honor, both in Latin and in the vernacular, of which, to keep my story concise, I will only quote the following:

Pingant sola alii referantque coloribus ora;
Cæciliæ os Raphael atque animum explicuit.

Pingant sola alii referantque coloribus ora;
Caecilia's face Raphael captured and expressed her spirit.

After this he also painted a little picture with small figures, which is likewise at Bologna, in the house of Count Vincenzio Ercolano, containing a Christ after the manner of Jove in Heaven, surrounded by the four Evangelists as Ezekiel describes them, one in the form of a man, another as a lion, the third an eagle, and the fourth an ox, with a little landscape below to represent the earth: which work, in its small proportions, is no less rare and beautiful than his others in their greatness.

After this, he painted a small picture with tiny figures, which is also in Bologna, at the house of Count Vincenzio Ercolano. It features Christ depicted like Jove in Heaven, surrounded by the four Evangelists as Ezekiel describes them: one as a man, another as a lion, the third as an eagle, and the fourth as an ox, with a small landscape below to represent the earth. This piece, despite its small size, is just as rare and beautiful as his larger works.

Pope Leo X with two Cardinals.

POPE LEO X WITH TWO CARDINALS
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Florence: Pitti, 40)
M.S.
View larger image

POPE LEO X WITH TWO CARDINALS
(After the painting by Raphael.
Florence: Pitti, 40)
M.S.
View larger image

To the Counts of Canossa in Verona he sent a large picture of equal excellence, in which is a very beautiful Nativity of Our Lord, with a daybreak that is much extolled, as is also the S. Anne, and, indeed, the whole work, which cannot be more highly praised than by saying that it is by the hand of Raffaello da Urbino. Wherefore those Counts rightly hold it in supreme veneration, nor have they ever consented, for all the [Pg 231] vast prices that have been offered to them by many Princes, to sell it to anyone.

To the Counts of Canossa in Verona, he sent a large painting of equal quality, featuring a stunning Nativity of Our Lord, with a much-praised sunrise, along with a beautiful St. Anne, and indeed, the whole piece, which can only be described as the work of Raffaello da Urbino. Therefore, those Counts rightly regard it with the utmost reverence, and they have never agreed, for all the [Pg 231] high prices that many Princes have offered, to sell it to anyone.

For Bindo Altoviti, he made a portrait of him when he was a young man, which is held to be extraordinary; and likewise a picture of Our Lady, which he sent to Florence, and which is now in the Palace of Duke Cosimo, in the chapel of the new apartments, which were built and painted by me, where it serves as altar-piece. In it is painted a very old S. Anne, seated, and holding out to Our Lady her Son, the features of whose countenance, as well as the whole of His nude form, are so beautiful that with His smile He rejoices whoever beholds Him; besides which, Raffaello depicted, in painting the Madonna, all the beauty that can be imparted to the aspect of a Virgin, with the complement of chaste humility in the eyes, honour in the brow, grace in the nose, and virtue in the mouth; not to mention that her raiment is such as to reveal infinite simplicity and dignity. And, indeed, I do not think that there is anything better to be seen than this whole work. There is a nude S. John, seated, with a female saint, who is likewise very beautiful; and for background there is a building, in which he painted a linen-covered window that gives light to the room wherein are the figures.

For Bindo Altoviti, he created a stunning portrait of him when he was young; it's considered exceptional. He also painted a picture of Our Lady, which he sent to Florence, and it's now in the Palace of Duke Cosimo, in the chapel of the new apartments that I built and painted; it serves as the altar piece. In it, there's a very old Saint Anne, seated and presenting her Son to Our Lady. The features of His face, as well as the entirety of His nude form, are so beautiful that His smile delights anyone who sees Him. Additionally, Raffaello captured in his painting of the Madonna all the beauty that can be given to the likeness of a Virgin, complemented by chaste humility in her eyes, dignity in her brow, grace in her nose, and virtue in her mouth. Not to mention, her clothing reveals an infinite simplicity and dignity. Honestly, I believe there's nothing better to admire than this entire work. There’s a nude Saint John sitting next to a female saint, who is also very beautiful; and in the background, there's a building where he painted a window covered with linen that lights up the room containing the figures.

In Rome he made a picture of good size, in which he portrayed Pope Leo, Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, and Cardinal de' Rossi. In this the figures appear to be not painted, but in full relief; there is the pile of the velvet, with the damask of the Pope's vestments shining and rustling, the fur of the linings soft and natural, and the gold and silk so counterfeited that they do not seem to be in colour, but real gold and silk. There is an illuminated book of parchment, which appears more real than the reality; and a little bell of wrought silver, which is more beautiful than words can tell. Among other things, also, is a ball of burnished gold on the Pope's chair, wherein are reflected, as if it were a mirror (such is its brightness), the light from the windows, the shoulders of the Pope, and the walls round the room. And all these things are executed with such diligence, that one may believe without any manner of doubt that no master is able, or is ever likely to be able, to do better. For this work the Pope was pleased to reward him very richly; and the picture is still [Pg 232] to be seen in Florence, in the guardaroba of the Duke. In like manner he executed portraits of Duke Lorenzo and Duke Giuliano, with a perfect grace of colouring not achieved by any other than himself, which are in the possession of the heirs of Ottaviano de' Medici at Florence.

In Rome, he created a sizable painting featuring Pope Leo, Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, and Cardinal de' Rossi. In this artwork, the figures appear three-dimensional rather than just painted; the texture of the velvet, the shimmering damask of the Pope's garments, the soft, natural fur of the linings, and the gold and silk are rendered so realistically that they look like real materials rather than just color. There's an illuminated parchment book that seems more lifelike than the actual thing, and a small silver bell that's more beautiful than words can express. Among other details, there's a polished gold ball on the Pope's chair that reflects the light from the windows, the Pope's shoulders, and the surrounding walls as if it were a mirror due to its brightness. All these elements are executed with such care that one might confidently believe no artist can, or ever will, surpass this level of skill. As a reward for this work, the Pope compensated him generously; the painting can still be seen in Florence, in the Duke's guardaroba. Similarly, he created portraits of Duke Lorenzo and Duke Giuliano, showcasing a perfect grace in color that no one else has achieved, which are currently held by the heirs of Ottaviano de' Medici in Florence.

Thereupon there came to Raffaello a great increase of glory, and likewise of rewards; and for this reason, in order to leave some memorial of himself, he caused a palace to be built in the Borgo Nuovo at Rome, which Bramante executed with castings. Now, the fame of this most noble craftsman, by reason of the aforesaid works and many others, having passed into France and Flanders, Albrecht Dürer, a most marvellous German painter, and an engraver of very beautiful copperplates, rendered tribute to Raffaello out of his own works, and sent to him a portrait of himself, a head, executed by him in gouache on a cloth of fine linen, which showed the same on either side, the lights being transparent and obtained without lead-white, while the only grounding and colouring was done with water-colours, the white of the cloth serving for the ground of the bright parts. This work seemed to Raffaello to be marvellous, and he sent him, therefore, many drawings executed by his own hand, which were received very gladly by Albrecht. That head was among the possessions of Giulio Romano, the heir of Raffaello, in Mantua.

Then Raffaello gained a significant amount of fame and rewards. To leave a mark of his legacy, he had a palace built in Borgo Nuovo in Rome, which was designed by Bramante. The reputation of this exceptional artist, thanks to the mentioned works and many others, spread to France and Flanders. Albrecht Dürer, a remarkable German painter and an engraver of beautiful copperplates, paid tribute to Raffaello with his own work and sent him a portrait of himself—a head he created in gouache on fine linen. This piece was identical on both sides, with transparent highlights achieved without lead-white, while the base and colors were done with watercolors; the white of the cloth served as the base for the bright areas. Raffaello found this work to be amazing, so he sent many drawings he had made himself, which Albrecht received very happily. That head eventually became part of Giulio Romano’s collection, Raffaello's heir, in Mantua.

Raffaello, having thus seen the manner of the engravings of Albrecht Dürer, and desiring on his own behalf to show what could be done with his work by such an art, caused Marc' Antonio Bolognese to make a very thorough study of the method; and that master became so excellent, that Raffaello commissioned him to make prints of his first works, such as the drawing of the Innocents, a Last Supper, the Neptune, and the S. Cecilia being boiled in oil. Marc' Antonio afterwards made for Raffaello a number of other engravings, which Raffaello finally gave to Baviera, his assistant, who had charge of a mistress whom Raffaello loved to the day of his death. Of her he made a very beautiful portrait, wherein she seemed wholly alive: and this is now in Florence, in the possession of that most gentle of men, Matteo Botti, a Florentine merchant, and an intimate friend of every able person, and particularly of [Pg 233] painters, who treasures it as a relic, on account of the love that he bears to art, and above all to Raffaello. And no less esteem is shown to the works of our arts and to the craftsmen by his brother, Simon Botti, who, besides being held by us all to be one of the most loving spirits that show favour to the men of our professions, is held in estimation by me in particular as the best and greatest friend that ever man loved after a long experience; not to mention the good judgment that he has and shows in matters of art.

Raffaello, having observed Albrecht Dürer's engraving style and wanting to demonstrate what could be achieved with his own work using this technique, asked Marc' Antonio Bolognese to conduct an in-depth study of the method. Marc' Antonio became so skilled that Raffaello commissioned him to create prints of his early works, including the drawing of the Innocents, a Last Supper, the Neptune, and the St. Cecilia being boiled in oil. Marc' Antonio later produced several other engravings for Raffaello, which Raffaello ultimately entrusted to Baviera, his assistant, who cared for a mistress whom Raffaello loved until his death. He created a striking portrait of her that made her appear completely alive, and this portrait is now in Florence, owned by the kind-hearted Matteo Botti, a Florentine merchant and a close friend to all talented individuals, especially painters. He treasures it as a keepsake due to his passion for art, particularly for Raffaello. Simon Botti, Matteo's brother, also holds a deep appreciation for our arts and the artists, and he is regarded by all of us as one of the most supportive friends of our profession, meriting special esteem from me as the best and greatest friend one could have after many years of experience, not to mention his keen insight into artistic matters.

But to return to the engravings; the favour shown by Raffaello to Baviera was the reason that there afterwards sprang up Marco da Ravenna and a host of others, insomuch that the dearth of copper engravings was changed into that abundance that we see at the present day. Thereupon Ugo da Carpi, having a brain inclined to ingenious and fanciful things, and showing beautiful invention, discovered the method of wood-engraving, whereby, with three blocks, giving the middle values, the lights, and the shadows, it is possible to imitate drawings in chiaroscuro, which was certainly a thing of beautiful and fanciful invention; and from this, also, there afterwards came an abundance of prints, as will be related with greater detail in the Life of Marc' Antonio Bolognese.

But to go back to the engravings; the favor shown by Raffaello to Baviera led to the emergence of Marco da Ravenna and many others, transforming the shortage of copper engravings into the abundance we see today. Then Ugo da Carpi, with a mind geared towards clever and imaginative ideas and demonstrating beautiful creativity, discovered the technique of wood engraving. This method, using three blocks to represent the midtones, highlights, and shadows, allows for the imitation of chiaroscuro drawings, which was indeed a beautiful and imaginative invention. From this, a wealth of prints later appeared, as will be discussed in more detail in the Life of Marc' Antonio Bolognese.

Raffaello then painted for the Monastery of the Monks of Monte Oliveto, called S. Maria dello Spasmo, at Palermo, a panel-picture of Christ bearing the Cross, which is held to be a marvellous work. In this may be seen the impious ministers of the Crucifixion, leading Him with wrath and fury to His death on Mount Calvary; and Christ, broken with agony at the near approach of death, has fallen to the ground under the weight of the Tree of the Cross, and, bathed with sweat and blood, turns towards the Maries, who are in a storm of weeping. Moreover, there is seen among them Veronica, who stretches out her arms and offers Him a cloth, with an expression of the tenderest love, not to mention that the work is full of men-at-arms both on horseback and on foot, who are pouring forth from the gate of Jerusalem with the standards of justice in their hands, in various most beautiful attitudes. This panel, when completely finished, but not yet brought to its resting-place, was very near coming to an evil end, for the story goes that after it had been put [Pg 234] on shipboard, in order that it might be carried to Palermo, a terrible storm dashed against a rock the ship that was carrying it, in such a manner that the timbers broke asunder, and all the men were lost, together with the merchandise, save only the panel, which, safely packed in its case, was washed by the sea on to the shore of Genoa. There, having been fished up and drawn to land, it was found to be a thing divine, and was put into safe keeping; for it had remained undamaged and without any hurt or blemish, since even the fury of the winds and the waves of the sea had respect for the beauty of such a work. The news of this being then bruited abroad, the monks took measures to recover it, and no sooner had it been restored to them, by the favour of the Pope, than they gave satisfaction, and that liberally, to those who had rescued it. Thereupon it was once more put on board ship and brought at last to Sicily, where they set it up in Palermo; in which place it has more fame and reputation than the Mount of Vulcan itself.

Raffaello then painted a panel for the Monastery of the Monks of Monte Oliveto, called S. Maria dello Spasmo, in Palermo, depicting Christ carrying the Cross, which is considered a marvelous work. In this, you can see the cruel ministers of the Crucifixion, angrily leading Him to His death on Mount Calvary; Christ, overwhelmed with agony as death approaches, has fallen to the ground under the weight of the Cross and, drenched in sweat and blood, turns towards the weeping Maries. Among them is Veronica, who reaches out with her arms, offering Him a cloth, filled with the deepest love. The panel also features soldiers, both on horseback and on foot, rushing out from the gate of Jerusalem, holding the standards of justice in various beautiful poses. This panel, when it was fully finished but not yet delivered, nearly met a tragic fate. The story goes that after it was loaded onto a ship to be taken to Palermo, a violent storm caused the ship to crash against a rock, breaking it apart and resulting in the loss of all the men and cargo, except for the panel, which was safely packed in its case and washed ashore in Genoa. Once it was retrieved and brought to land, it was found to be a divine piece of art, remaining undamaged and without any flaws, as even the violent winds and waves had respected its beauty. Once word of this spread, the monks took steps to reclaim it, and as soon as it was returned to them, thanks to the Pope's favor, they generously rewarded those who had rescued it. It was then loaded onto another ship and finally brought to Sicily, where it was set up in Palermo, gaining more fame and reputation than the Mount of Vulcan itself.

While Raffaello was engaged on these works, which, having to gratify great and distinguished persons, he could not refuse to undertake—not to mention that his own private interests prevented him from saying them nay—yet for all this he never ceased to carry on the series of pictures that he had begun in the Papal apartments and halls; wherein he always kept men who pursued the work from his own designs, while he himself, continually supervising everything, lent to so vast an enterprise the aid of the best efforts of which he was capable. No long time passed, therefore, before he threw open that apartment of the Borgia Tower in which he had painted a scene on every wall, two above the windows, and two others on the unbroken walls. In one was the Burning of the Borgo Vecchio of Rome, when, all other methods having failed to put out the fire, S. Leo IV presents himself at the Loggia of his Palace and extinguishes it completely with his benediction. In this scene are represented various perils. On one side are women who are bearing vessels filled with water in their hands and on their heads, whereby to extinguish the flames; and their hair and draperies are blown about by the terrible fury of a tempestuous wind. Others, who are seeking to throw water on the fire, are blinded by the smoke and wholly bewildered. On the other side, [Pg 235] after the manner of Virgil's story of Anchises being carried by Æneas, is shown an old sick man, overcome by his infirmity and the flames of the fire; and in the figure of the young man are seen courage and strength, and great effort in all his limbs under the weight of the old man, who lies helpless on the young man's back. He is followed by an old woman with bare feet and disordered garments, who is flying from the fire; and a little naked boy runs before them. On the top of some ruins, likewise, may be seen a naked woman, with hair all dishevelled, who has her child in her hands and is throwing him to a man of her house, who, having escaped from the flames, is standing in the street on tiptoe, with arms outstretched to receive the child wrapped in swathing-bands; wherein the eager anxiety of the woman to save her son may be recognized no less clearly than her torment in the peril of the fierce flames, which are already licking around her. And no less suffering is evident in him who is receiving the child, both for its sake and on account of his own fear of death. Nor is it possible to describe the imagination that this most ingenious and most marvellous craftsman showed in a mother with her feet bare, her garments in disorder, her girdle unbound, and her hair dishevelled, who has gathered her children before her and is driving them on, holding part of her clothing in one hand, that they may escape from the ruins and from that blazing furnace; not to mention that there are also some women who, kneeling before the Pope, appear to be praying to his Holiness that he should make the fire cease.

While Raffaello was working on these projects, which he couldn’t refuse since they were for important and distinguished people — not to mention that his own interests also made it hard to say no — he still continued to create the series of paintings he had started in the Papal apartments and halls. In this, he always had people working from his designs, while he himself continually oversaw everything, bringing his best efforts to such a massive undertaking. Before long, he revealed the apartment in the Borgia Tower where he had painted a scene on every wall, two above the windows, and two others on the solid walls. One depicted the Burning of the Borgo Vecchio in Rome, when, after all other attempts to extinguish the fire had failed, S. Leo IV stepped out onto the Loggia of his Palace and completely put it out with his blessing. This scene shows various dangers. On one side, women carry vessels filled with water in their hands and on their heads to put out the flames, with their hair and draperies blown about by the fierce winds. Others, trying to throw water on the fire, are blinded by the smoke and in complete disarray. On the other side, [Pg 235], reminiscent of Virgil's story of Anchises being carried by Æneas, shows an old, sick man, overwhelmed by his illness and the flames. In the figure of the young man, you can see courage and strength, straining under the weight of the helpless old man on his back. He is followed by an old woman with bare feet and disheveled clothes, fleeing from the fire; a small naked boy runs ahead of them. On top of some ruins, there is also a naked woman with unkempt hair, holding her child and throwing him to a man from her household, who has escaped the flames and is standing in the street, on tiptoe, arms outstretched to catch the child wrapped in swaddling clothes; the intense urgency of the woman to save her son is clearly shown, as is her anguish from the fierce flames already creeping around her. The suffering is just as apparent in the man receiving the child, both from concern for the child and his own fear of death. It's impossible to fully describe the imagination of this incredibly skilled craftsman as he depicted a mother with bare feet, disordered clothing, an unbound girdle, and disheveled hair, gathering her children before her and urging them on while holding part of her clothing in one hand, trying to lead them to safety from the ruins and the blazing fire. Additionally, some women are kneeling before the Pope, appearing to pray for him to put an end to the flames.

The next scene is from the life of the same S. Leo IV, wherein Raffaello depicted the port of Ostia occupied by the fleet of the Turks, who had come to take the Pope prisoner. The Christians may be seen fighting against that fleet on the sea; and already there has come to the harbour an endless number of prisoners, who are disembarking from a boat and being dragged by the beard by some soldiers, who are very beautiful in features and most spirited in their attitudes. The prisoners, dressed in the motley garb of galley-slaves, are being led before S. Leo, whose figure is a portrait of Pope Leo X. Here Raffaello painted his Holiness in pontificals, between Cardinal Santa Maria in Portico, who was Bernardo Divizio of Bibbiena, and Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, who afterwards [Pg 236] became Pope Clement. Nor is it possible to describe in detail the beautiful conceptions that this most ingenious craftsman showed in the expressions of the prisoners, wherein one can recognize, without speech, their grief and the fear of death.

The next scene is from the life of the same S. Leo IV, where Raffaello depicted the port of Ostia occupied by the Turkish fleet, which had come to capture the Pope. You can see the Christians fighting against that fleet on the sea; and already, a huge number of prisoners have arrived at the harbor, disembarking from a boat and being dragged by the beard by some soldiers, who are very attractive and full of spirit in their poses. The prisoners, dressed in the mixed clothing of galley-slaves, are being led before S. Leo, whose figure is a portrait of Pope Leo X. Here, Raffaello painted the Holy Father in his ceremonial robes, between Cardinal Santa Maria in Portico, who was Bernardo Divizio of Bibbiena, and Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, who later [Pg 236] became Pope Clement. It's hard to fully describe the beautiful concepts that this incredibly talented artist displayed in the expressions of the prisoners, where you can unmistakably recognize, without words, their sorrow and fear of death.

In the first of the other two scenes is Pope Leo X consecrating the most Christian King, Francis I of France, chanting the Mass in his pontificals, and blessing the oil for the anointing of the King, and likewise the royal crown. There, besides the great number of Cardinals and Bishops in their robes, who are assisting, he portrayed from life many Ambassadors and other persons, and also some figures dressed in the French fashion, according to the style of that time. In the other scene he painted the Crowning of the same King, wherein are portraits from life of the Pope and of Francis, one in armour and the other in his pontificals; besides which, all the Cardinals, Bishops, Chamberlains, Esquires, and Grooms of the Chamber are seated in due order in their places, as is the custom in the chapel, all in their robes and portrayed from life, among them being Giannozzo Pandolfini, Bishop of Troia, a close friend of Raffaello, with many others who were distinguished at that time. Near the King is a little boy kneeling, who is holding the royal crown—a portrait of Ippolito de' Medici, who afterwards became Cardinal and Vice-Chancellor, a man of great repute, and much the friend not only of this art, but of all others, to whose blessed memory I acknowledge a vast obligation, seeing that my first steps, such as they were, were taken under his auspices.

In the first of the two other scenes, Pope Leo X is consecrating the most Christian King, Francis I of France, while chanting the Mass in his papal vestments and blessing the oil for the King's anointing, along with the royal crown. There, alongside a large number of Cardinals and Bishops in their robes, who are in attendance, he depicted many Ambassadors and others from life, as well as some figures dressed in the French fashion of the time. In the other scene, he painted the Crowning of the same King, featuring lifelike portraits of the Pope and Francis—one in armor and the other in his papal attire. Additionally, all the Cardinals, Bishops, Chamberlains, Esquires, and Grooms of the Chamber are seated in their places, as is customary in the chapel, all in their robes and also depicted from life, including Giannozzo Pandolfini, Bishop of Troia, a close friend of Raffaello, among many others distinguished at that time. Near the King is a small boy kneeling, holding the royal crown—this is a portrait of Ippolito de' Medici, who later became a Cardinal and Vice-Chancellor, a highly respected man and a significant supporter of not just this art but of all arts, to whose blessed memory I owe a great debt, considering my first steps, however small they were, were taken under his guidance.

It is not possible to write of every detail in the works of this craftsman, wherein every least thing, although dumb, appears to have speech: save only of the bases executed below these pictures, with various figures of defenders and benefactors of the Church, and various terminal figures on either side of them, the whole being wrought in such a manner that everything reveals spirit, feeling, and thought, and with such a harmony and unity of colouring that nothing better can be conceived. And since the ceiling of that apartment had been painted by Pietro Perugino, his master, Raffaello would not destroy it, moved by respect for his memory and by the love that he bore to the man who had been the origin of the rank that he held in his art.

It’s impossible to detail everything in the works of this artist, where even the smallest elements seem to speak: except for the bases beneath these pictures, which feature various figures of defenders and benefactors of the Church, along with different terminal figures on either side. The entire work is executed in such a way that everything expresses spirit, emotion, and thought, with such harmony and unity of color that nothing better could be imagined. And since the ceiling of that room had been painted by Pietro Perugino, his master, Raffaello chose not to alter it, out of respect for his memory and the admiration he had for the man who had influenced his standing in the art world.

[Pg 237] Such was the greatness of this master, that he kept designers all over Italy, at Pozzuolo, and even in Greece; and he was for ever searching out everything of the good that might help his art.

[Pg 237] This master was so great that he employed designers from all over Italy, in Pozzuolo, and even in Greece; he was constantly seeking out anything valuable that could enhance his art.

Now, continuing his work, he also painted a hall, wherein were some figures of the Apostles and other saints in tabernacles, executed in terretta; and there he caused to be made by Giovanni da Udine, his disciple, who has no equal in the painting of animals, all the animals that Pope Leo possessed, such as the chameleon, the civet-cats, the apes, the parrots, the lions, the elephants, and other beasts even more strange. And besides embellishing the Palace greatly with grotesques and varied pavements, he also gave the designs for the Papal staircases, as well as for the loggie begun by the architect Bramante, but left unfinished on account of his death, and afterwards carried out with the new design and architecture of Raffaello, who made for this a model of wood with better proportion and adornment than had been accomplished by Bramante. The Pope wishing to demonstrate the greatness and magnificence of his generous ambition, Raffaello made the designs for the ornaments in stucco and for the scenes that were painted there, and likewise for the compartments; and as for the stucco and the grotesques, he placed at the head of that work Giovanni da Udine, and the figures he entrusted to Giulio Romano, although that master worked but little at them; and he also employed Giovanni Francesco, Il Bologna, Perino del Vaga, Pellegrino da Modena, Vincenzio da San Gimignano, and Polidoro da Caravaggio, with many other painters, who executed scenes and figures and other things that were required throughout that work, which Raffaello caused to be completed with such perfection, that he even sent to Florence for pavements by the hand of Luca della Robbia. Wherefore it is certain that with regard to the paintings, the stucco-ornaments, the arrangement, or any of the beautiful inventions, no one would be able to execute or even to imagine a more marvellous work; and its beauty was the reason that Raffaello received the charge of all the works of painting and architecture that were in progress in the Palace.

Now, continuing his work, he also painted a hall, featuring figures of the Apostles and other saints in tabernacles, done in terra cotta; and there he had his disciple Giovanni da Udine—who is unmatched in painting animals—create all the animals that Pope Leo owned, including the chameleon, civet cats, monkeys, parrots, lions, elephants, and even more exotic beasts. Besides greatly enhancing the Palace with grotesques and varied flooring, he also designed the Papal staircases and the loggias that were started by the architect Bramante but left unfinished after his death. Raffaello later completed these with a new design and architecture, making a wooden model that had better proportion and decoration than what Bramante had achieved. The Pope, wanting to showcase the greatness and splendor of his ambitious plans, had Raffaello create designs for the stucco ornaments and the painted scenes, as well as for the compartments. For the stucco and the grotesques, he assigned Giovanni da Udine to lead that work, and entrusted the figures to Giulio Romano, although that master contributed little to them. He also had Giovanni Francesco, Il Bologna, Perino del Vaga, Pellegrino da Modena, Vincenzio da San Gimignano, and Polidoro da Caravaggio involved, along with many other painters, who executed scenes, figures, and various other tasks needed throughout the project, which Raffaello ensured was completed to such perfection that he even sent to Florence for pavements made by Luca della Robbia. Therefore, it is clear that when it comes to the paintings, stucco ornaments, layout, or any of the beautiful innovations, no one could replicate or even imagine a more marvelous work; its beauty was the reason Raffaello was given charge of all the painting and architecture projects underway in the Palace.

It is said that the courtesy of Raffaello was such that he prevailed upon the masons, in order that he might accommodate his friends, not to [Pg 238] build the walls absolutely solid and unbroken, but to leave, above the old rooms below, various openings and spaces for the storage of barrels, flasks, and wood; which holes and spaces so weakened the lower part of the masonry, that afterwards they had to be filled in, because the whole was beginning to show cracks. He commissioned Gian Barile to adorn all the doors and ceilings of woodwork with a good number of carvings, which he executed and finished with beautiful grace.

It’s said that Raffaello was so considerate that he convinced the masons, in order to help his friends, not to [Pg 238] build the walls completely solid and unbroken, but to leave various openings and spaces above the old rooms below for storing barrels, flasks, and wood. These gaps weakened the lower part of the masonry, so they eventually had to be filled in because cracks started to appear. He hired Gian Barile to decorate all the doors and ceilings with a good number of carvings, which he completed with beautiful skill.

He gave architectural designs for the Vigna[26] of the Pope, and for many houses in the Borgo; in particular, for the Palace of Messer Giovanni Battista dall' Aquila, which was a very beautiful work. He also designed one for the Bishop of Troia, who had it built in the Via di S. Gallo at Florence. For the Black Friars of S. Sisto in Piacenza, he painted the picture for their high-altar, containing the Madonna with S. Sisto and S. Barbara, a truly rare and extraordinary work. He executed many pictures to be sent into France, and in particular, for the King, a S. Michael fighting with the Devil, which was held to be a marvellous thing. In this work he painted a fire-scarred rock, to represent the centre of the earth, from the fissures of which were issuing sulphurous flames; and in Lucifer, whose scorched and burned limbs are painted with various tints of flesh-colour, could be seen all the shades of anger that his venomous and swollen pride calls up against Him who overbears the greatness of him who is deprived of any kingdom where there might be peace, and doomed to suffer perpetual punishment. The opposite may be perceived in the S. Michael, clad in armour of iron and gold, who, although he is painted with a celestial air, yet has valour, force, and terror in his aspect, and has already thrown Lucifer down and hurled him backwards with his spear. In a word, this work was of such a kind that he won for it, and rightly, a most honourable reward from that King. He made portraits of Beatrice of Ferrara and other ladies, and in particular that of his own mistress, with an endless number of others.

He created architectural designs for the Pope's Vigna[26] and for many homes in the Borgo, especially the Palace of Messer Giovanni Battista dall' Aquila, which was a stunning piece of work. He also designed one for the Bishop of Troia, who had it built on Via di S. Gallo in Florence. For the Black Friars of S. Sisto in Piacenza, he painted a high-altar piece featuring the Madonna with S. Sisto and S. Barbara, a truly unique and extraordinary work. He produced many paintings that were sent to France, particularly for the King, including a depiction of S. Michael battling the Devil, which was considered remarkable. In this work, he illustrated a fire-scorched rock to represent the center of the earth, from which sulfurous flames emerged; and in Lucifer, whose charred and burned limbs were painted in various flesh tones, one could see all the shades of anger that his toxic and swollen pride incites against the one who surpasses him—the one who has lost any kingdom where there might be peace, condemned to eternal suffering. In contrast, S. Michael is shown clad in armor of iron and gold, with a celestial presence, yet exuding courage, strength, and terror, already having cast Lucifer down and pushed him back with his spear. In short, this piece was such that he rightfully earned a most honorable reward from that King. He also painted portraits of Beatrice of Ferrara and other noblewomen, notably one of his own mistress, among countless others.

Raffaello was a very amorous person, delighting much in women, and ever ready to serve them; which was the reason that, in the pursuit of his carnal pleasures, he found his friends more complacent and indulgent [Pg 239] towards him than perchance was right. Wherefore, when his dear friend Agostino Chigi commissioned him to paint the first loggia in his palace, Raffaello was not able to give much attention to his work, on account of the love that he had for his mistress; at which Agostino fell into such despair, that he so contrived by means of others, by himself, and in other ways, as to bring it about, although only with difficulty, that this lady should come to live continually with Raffaello in that part of the house where he was working; and in this manner the work was brought to completion. For this work he made all the cartoons, and he coloured many of the figures in fresco with his own hand. And on the ceiling he made the Council of the Gods in Heaven, wherein, in the forms of the Gods, are seen many vestments and lineaments copied from the antique, and executed with very beautiful grace and draughtsmanship. In like manner he made the Marriage of Psyche, with ministers serving Jove, and the Graces scattering flowers over the table. In the spandrels of the vaulting he executed many scenes, in one of which is Mercury with his flute, who, as he flies, has all the appearance of descending from Heaven; and in another is Jove with an air of celestial dignity, kissing Ganymede; and in another, likewise, lower down, is the Car of Venus, and the Graces, with Mercury, drawing Psyche up to Heaven; with many other scenes from the poets in the other spandrels. And in the spherical triangles of the vaulting above the arches, between the spandrels, are many most beautiful little boys in foreshortening, hovering in the air and carrying all the instruments of the gods; Jove's lightnings and thunderbolts, the helmet, sword, and shield of Mars, Vulcan's hammers, the club and lion-skin of Hercules, the caduceus of Mercury, Pan's pipes, and the agricultural rakes of Vertumnus. All are accompanied by animals appropriate to their character; and the whole work, both as picture and as poem, is truly beautiful. Round these scenes he caused Giovanni da Udine to make a border of all kinds of flowers, foliage, and fruits, in festoons, which are as beautiful as they could be.

Raffaello was quite the romantic, taking great pleasure in women and always eager to serve them. This indulgence led his friends to be more lenient and accommodating towards him than perhaps they should have been. So, when his close friend Agostino Chigi asked him to paint the first loggia in his palace, Raffaello struggled to focus on his work due to his love for his mistress. Agostino became so distressed that he found a way, with help from others and by his own means, to ensure that this lady would live with Raffaello in the part of the house where he was working; this ultimately helped get the project finished. For this commission, he created all the sketches and personally painted many of the figures in fresco. He also painted the Council of the Gods in Heaven on the ceiling, featuring many outfits and details inspired by ancient art, all executed with exceptional elegance and skill. He further illustrated the Marriage of Psyche, with attendants serving Jupiter, and the Graces scattering flowers over the table. In the spandrels of the vaulting, he depicted various scenes, including Mercury with his flute, appearing to descend from Heaven, and Jupiter dignifiedly kissing Ganymede. In another scene, lower down, there’s Venus in her chariot, with the Graces and Mercury lifting Psyche to Heaven, along with many other scenes inspired by poets in the remaining spandrels. In the spherical triangles above the arches, interspersed among the spandrels, are many charming little cherubs in foreshortening, floating in the air and holding various instruments of the gods: Jupiter's lightning bolts and thunder, Mars's helmet, sword, and shield, Vulcan's hammers, Hercules's club and lion-skin, Mercury's caduceus, Pan's pipes, and the agricultural tools of Vertumnus. Each is accompanied by animals fitting their identities, and the entire work, both as a visual and as a narrative, is truly stunning. Surrounding these scenes, he had Giovanni da Udine create a border of an array of flowers, leaves, and fruits in festoons, which are as beautiful as could be.

Raffaello made the designs for the architecture of the stables of the Chigi, and the design for the chapel of the aforesaid Agostino in S. Maria del Popolo, wherein, besides painting it, he made arrangements for the [Pg 240] erection of a marvellous tomb, causing Lorenzetto, a sculptor of Florence, to execute two figures, which are still in his house in the Macello de' Corbi at Rome; but the death of Raffaello, followed by that of Agostino, brought it about that this work was given to Sebastiano Viniziano.

Raffaello created the designs for the Chigi stables and the chapel for Agostino in S. Maria del Popolo. In addition to painting it, he arranged for the [Pg 240] construction of an amazing tomb, commissioning the Florentine sculptor Lorenzetto to make two figures, which are still in his house on Macello de' Corbi in Rome. However, the deaths of Raffaello and then Agostino meant that this project was assigned to Sebastiano Viniziano.

Meanwhile Raffaello had risen to such greatness, that Leo X ordained that he should set to work on the Great Hall on the upper floor, wherein are the Victories of Constantine; and with this he made a beginning. A fancy likewise took the Pope to have some very rich tapestries made in gold and floss-silk; whereupon Raffaello drew and coloured with his own hand, of the exact form and size, all the cartoons, which were sent to Flanders to be woven; and the tapestries, when finished, were brought to Rome. This work was executed so marvellously, that it arouses astonishment in whoever beholds it, wondering how it could have been possible to weave the hair and beards in such detail, and to give softness to the flesh with mere threads; and it is truly rather a miracle than the work of human art, seeing that in these tapestries are animals, water, and buildings, all made in such a way that they seem to be not woven, but really wrought with the brush. The work cost 70,000 crowns, and it is still preserved in the Papal Chapel.

Meanwhile, Raffaello had achieved such greatness that Leo X ordered him to start working on the Great Hall on the upper floor, where the Victories of Constantine are displayed; and he began this task. The Pope also got the idea of having some very luxurious tapestries made with gold and silk; so Raffaello personally designed and colored all the cartoons, ensuring they were the exact form and size, which were then sent to Flanders to be woven. When the tapestries were finished, they were brought to Rome. This work was carried out so brilliantly that it amazes everyone who sees it, leaving them to wonder how it was possible to weave the hair and beards with such detail and to create softness in the flesh using just threads; it truly feels more like a miracle than a product of human artistry, as these tapestries feature animals, water, and buildings crafted in such a way that they appear not woven, but actually painted with a brush. The total cost of the work was 70,000 crowns, and it is still preserved in the Papal Chapel.

For Cardinal Colonna he painted a S. John on canvas, for which, on account of its beauty, that Cardinal had an extraordinary love; but happening to be attacked by illness, he was asked by Messer Jacopo da Carpi, the physician who cured him, to give it to him as a present; and because of this desire of Messer Jacopo, to whom he felt himself very deeply indebted, he gave it up. It is now in the possession of Francesco Benintendi, in Florence.

For Cardinal Colonna, he painted a canvas of St. John that the Cardinal loved deeply because of its beauty. However, when he fell ill, Messer Jacopo da Carpi, the doctor who treated him, asked him to give it as a gift. Feeling very grateful to Messer Jacopo, he agreed to give it up. It is now with Francesco Benintendi in Florence.

The Transfiguration.

THE TRANSFIGURATION
(After the panel by Raffaello da Urbino.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

THE TRANSFIGURATION
(After the panel by Raphael.
Rome: The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image

For Giulio de' Medici, Cardinal and Vice-Chancellor, he painted a panel-picture, to be sent into France, of the Transfiguration of Christ, at which he laboured without ceasing, and brought it to the highest perfection with his own hand. In this scene he represented Christ Transfigured on Mount Tabor, at the foot of which are the eleven Disciples awaiting Him. There may be seen a young man possessed by a spirit, who has been brought thither in order that Christ, after descending from the mountain, may deliver him; which young man stretches himself out [Pg 241] in a distorted attitude, crying and rolling his eyes, and reveals his suffering in his flesh, his veins, and the beat of his pulse, all infected by that malignant spirit; and the colour of his flesh, as he makes those violent and fearsome gestures, is very pale. This figure is supported by an old man, who, having embraced him and taken heart, with his eyes wide open and the light shining in them, is raising his brows and wrinkling his forehead, showing at one and the same time both strength and fear; gazing intently, however, at the Apostles, he appears to be encouraging himself by trusting in them. Among many women is one, the principal figure in that panel, who, having knelt down before the Apostles, and turning her head towards them, stretches her arms in the direction of the maniac and points out his misery; besides which the Apostles, some standing, some seated, and others kneeling, show that they are moved to very great compassion by such misfortune. And, indeed, he made therein figures and heads so fine in their novelty and variety, to say nothing of their extraordinary beauty, that it is the common opinion of all craftsmen that this work, among the vast number that he painted, is the most glorious, the most lovely, and the most divine. For whoever wishes to know how Christ Transfigured and made Divine should be represented in painting, must look at this work, wherein Raffaello made Him in perspective over that mount, in a sky of exceeding brightness, with Moses and Elias, who, illumined by a dazzling splendour, burst into life in His light. Prostrate on the ground, in attitudes of great beauty and variety, are Peter, James, and John; one has his head to the earth, and another, shading his eyes with his hands, is defending himself from the rays and intense light of the splendour of Christ. He, clothed in snow-white raiment, with His arms outstretched and His head raised, appears to reveal the Divine essence and nature of all the Three Persons united and concentrated in Himself by the perfect art of Raffaello, who seems to have summoned up all his powers in such a manner, in order to show the supreme force of his art in the countenance of Christ, that, after finishing this, the last work that he was to do, he never again touched a brush, being overtaken by death.

For Giulio de' Medici, Cardinal and Vice-Chancellor, he painted a panel for France depicting the Transfiguration of Christ. He worked tirelessly on it, bringing it to perfection with his own hands. In the scene, he shows Christ Transfigured on Mount Tabor, with the eleven Disciples waiting below. There’s a young man possessed by a spirit, brought there so Christ could heal him after coming down from the mountain. This young man is sprawled out in a twisted position, crying and rolling his eyes, showing his suffering through his flesh, veins, and pulse, all affected by the evil spirit. His skin looks very pale as he makes those violent, fearful movements. An old man supports him, having embraced him and gained courage; with wide-open eyes glowing with light, he raises his brows and furrows his forehead, displaying both strength and fear; while gazing intently at the Apostles, he seems to be encouraging himself with trust in them. Among several women, one stands out as the main figure in the panel, kneeling before the Apostles, turning her head toward them, stretching her arms toward the troubled man and pointing out his suffering. The Apostles, some standing, some seated, and others kneeling, show that they are deeply moved by his misfortune. In fact, he created figures and heads with such fine novelty and variety, not to mention extraordinary beauty, that it's the general consensus among craftsmen that this work is the most glorious, beautiful, and divine of all he painted. Anyone wishing to understand how to represent the Transfigured and Divine Christ in art should look at this piece, where Raffaello depicts Him in perspective on that mountain, in a brilliantly bright sky, with Moses and Elijah, who shine with dazzling light in His presence. Lying on the ground in poses of great beauty and variety are Peter, James, and John; one has his head to the ground, while another shields his eyes with his hands, trying to block out the rays and intense light radiating from Christ's glory. He, clothed in snow-white garments with His arms outstretched and head raised, seems to reveal the Divine essence and the nature of all Three Persons united in Himself, achieved through Raffaello's perfect art. It seems he poured all his talents into showcasing the supreme power of his art in Christ’s face, so much so that after finishing this, his last work, he never touched a brush again, as death soon overtook him.

The Three Graces.

RAFFAELLO DA URBINO: THE THREE GRACES
(Chantilly, 38. Panel)
View larger image

RAFFAELLO DA URBINO: THE THREE GRACES
(Chantilly, 38. Panel)
View larger image

Now, having described the works of this most excellent craftsman, [Pg 242] before I come to relate other particulars of his life and death, I do not wish to grudge the labour of saying something, for the benefit of the men of our arts, about the various manners of Raffaello. He, then, after having imitated in his boyhood the manner of his master, Pietro Perugino, which he made much better in draughtsmanship, colouring, and invention, believed that he had done enough; but he recognized, when he had reached a riper age, that he was still too far from the truth. For, after seeing the works of Leonardo da Vinci, who had no peer in the expressions of heads both of men and of women, and surpassed all other painters in giving grace and movement to his figures, he was left marvelling and amazed; and in a word, the manner of Leonardo pleasing him more than any other that he had ever seen, he set himself to study it, and abandoning little by little, although with great difficulty, the manner of Pietro, he sought to the best of his power and knowledge to imitate that of Leonardo. But for all his diligence and study, in certain difficulties he was never able to surpass Leonardo; and although it appears to many that he did surpass him in sweetness and in a kind of natural facility, nevertheless he was by no means superior to him in that sublime groundwork of conceptions and that grandeur of art in which few have been the peers of Leonardo. Yet Raffaello came very near to him, more than any other painter, and above all in grace of colouring. But to return to Raffaello himself; in time he found himself very much hindered and impeded by the manner that he had adopted from Pietro when he was quite young, which he acquired with ease, since it was over-precise, dry, and feeble in draughtsmanship. His being unable to forget it was the reason that he had great difficulty in learning the beauties of the nude and the methods of difficult foreshortenings from the cartoon that Michelagnolo Buonarroti made for the Council Hall in Florence; and another might have lost heart, believing that he had been previously wasting his time, and would never have achieved, however lofty his genius, what Raffaello accomplished. But he, having purged himself of Pietro's manner, and having thoroughly freed himself of it, in order to learn the manner of Michelagnolo, so full of difficulties in every part, was changed, as it were, from a master once again into a disciple; and he [Pg 243] forced himself with incredible study, when already a man, to do in a few months what might have called for the tender age at which all things are best acquired, and for a space of many years. For in truth he who does not learn in good time right principles and the manner that he wishes to follow, and does not proceed little by little to solve the difficulties of the arts by means of experience, seeking to understand every part, and to put it into practice, can scarcely ever become perfect; and even if he does, that can only be after a longer space of time and much greater labour.

Now that I’ve talked about the works of this incredible artist, [Pg 242] before I go into more details about his life and death, I want to take a moment to say something for the benefit of artists like us about Raffaello’s various styles. He, after mimicking his master, Pietro Perugino, in his youth—improving on it significantly in drawing, color, and creativity—thought he had done enough. However, as he got older, he realized he was still far from the truth. After seeing the works of Leonardo da Vinci, who was unmatched in capturing expressions in both men and women and who surpassed all other painters in grace and motion in his figures, he was left in awe. Leonardo’s style appealed to him more than any he had seen, prompting him to study it. Gradually, though with great difficulty, he began to abandon Pietro’s style and tried his best to imitate Leonardo’s. Despite his hard work, there were certain aspects where he could never outshine Leonardo. Although many believe he surpassed Leonardo in sweetness and a kind of natural ease, he was never truly superior in that profound foundation of ideas and the grandeur of art that very few could match. Still, Raffaello came closer to him than any other painter, especially in color grace. Returning to Raffaello himself; over time, he found himself greatly hindered by the style he picked up from Pietro when he was younger, which he had learned easily but was overly precise, dry, and lacking in depth. His struggle to forget this style made it hard for him to grasp the beauty of the nude and the complexities of challenging foreshortenings from the cartoon Michelangelo Buonarroti designed for the Council Hall in Florence. Another artist might have lost hope, thinking he had wasted his time and would never achieve what Raffaello did, no matter how talented. But he, having let go of Pietro's style and completely freeing himself to learn Michelangelo's complex techniques, went back to being a student again. He [Pg 243] pushed himself with incredible effort, as a grown man, to accomplish in a few months what usually requires the delicate age when everything is best learned and many years of practice. In truth, if someone does not learn the right principles and the style they want to follow in a timely manner and does not gradually work through the challenges of the arts with experience, striving to understand and apply every aspect, they can hardly ever achieve perfection; and even if they do, it will take much longer and require a lot more hard work.

When Raffaello resolved to set himself to change and improve his manner, he had never given his attention to nudes with that zealous study which is necessary, and had only drawn them from life in the manner that he had seen practised by his master Pietro, imparting to them the grace that he had from nature. He then devoted himself to studying the nude and to comparing the muscles of anatomical subjects and of flayed human bodies with those of the living, which, being covered with skin, are not clearly defined, as they are when the skin has been removed; and going on to observe in what way they acquire the softness of flesh in the proper places, and how certain graceful flexures are produced by changing the point of view, and also the effect of inflating, lowering, or raising either a limb or the whole person, and likewise the concatenation of the bones, nerves, and veins, he became excellent in all the points that are looked for in a painter of eminence. Knowing, however, that in this respect he could never attain to the perfection of Michelagnolo, he reflected, like a man of supreme judgment, that painting does not consist only in representing the nude human form, but has a wider field; that one can enumerate among the perfect painters those who express historical inventions well and with facility, and who show fine judgment in their fancies; and that he who, in the composition of scenes, can make them neither confused with too much detail nor poor with too little, but distributed with beautiful invention and order, may also be called an able and judicious craftsman. To this, as Raffaello was well aware, may be added the enriching those scenes with a bizarre variety of perspectives, buildings, and landscapes, the method of clothing figures gracefully, the [Pg 244] making them fade away sometimes in the shadows, and sometimes come forward into the light, the imparting of life and beauty to the heads of women, children, young men and old, and the giving them movement and boldness, according to necessity. He considered, also, how important is the furious flight of horses in battles, fierceness in soldiers, the knowledge how to depict all the sorts of animals, and above all the power to give such resemblance to portraits that they seem to be alive, and that it is known whom they represent; with an endless number of other things, such as the adornment of draperies, foot-wear, helmets, armour, women's head-dresses, hair, beards, vases, trees, grottoes, rocks, fires, skies turbid or serene, clouds, rain, lightning, clear weather, night, the light of the moon, the splendour of the sun, and innumerable other things, which are called for every moment by the requirements of the art of painting. Pondering over these things, I say, Raffaello resolved, since he could not approach Michelagnolo in that branch of art to which he had set his hand, to seek to equal, and perchance to surpass him, in these others; and he devoted himself, therefore, not to imitating the manner of that master, but to the attainment of a catholic excellence in the other fields of art that have been described. And if the same had been done by many craftsmen of our own age, who, having determined to pursue the study of Michelagnolo's works alone, have failed to imitate him and have not been able to reach his extraordinary perfection, they would not have laboured in vain nor acquired a manner so hard, so full of difficulty, wanting in beauty and colouring, and poor in invention, but would have been able, by aiming at catholicity and at imitation in the other fields of art, to render service both to themselves and to the world.

When Raffaello decided to change and improve his style, he had never really focused on studying nudes with the intense dedication it requires. He had only drawn them from life the way he saw his teacher Pietro do, capturing the grace he found in nature. He then dedicated himself to studying the human body and comparing the muscles of anatomical subjects and dissected human bodies with those of living people, whose features are less defined because they are covered by skin. He observed how bodies gain the softness of flesh in the right places, how certain elegant curves come from changing the viewpoint, and how inflating, lowering, or raising either a limb or the whole person affects the look. He also examined the connections between bones, nerves, and veins, and through all of this, he became skilled in everything expected of an outstanding painter. However, knowing he could never reach the perfection of Michelagnolo in this aspect, he realized, as a wise person, that painting isn't just about depicting the nude human form; it encompasses much more. Among the great painters are those who effectively and easily convey historical narratives and show good judgment in their ideas. A skilled painter is the one who can compose scenes that are neither cluttered with excessive details nor too sparse, but instead are beautifully arranged and inventive. Raffaello was acutely aware that these scenes should also be enhanced with a diverse range of perspectives, buildings, and landscapes, with figures dressed elegantly. He thought about how to make them fade into shadows or step into the light, how to bring life and beauty to women, children, young men, and the elderly, and how to give them movement and confidence as needed. He also considered the dramatic flight of horses in battles, the fierce expressions of soldiers, the ability to depict all kinds of animals, and especially the power to create portraits that look alive and clearly represent the subjects, along with countless other details like the embellishment of clothing, footwear, helmets, armor, women's hairstyles, hair, beards, vases, trees, caves, rocks, fire, skies both stormy and clear, clouds, rain, lightning, sunshine, nighttime, moonlight, and numerous other elements that the art of painting demands at every moment. Reflecting on all this, Raffaello resolved that since he could not match Michelagnolo in that specific area of art he had chosen, he would strive to equal or even surpass him in the other aspects. Thus, he focused not on imitating that master’s style, but on achieving universal excellence in the other fields mentioned. If many artists of our time had done the same—choosing instead to pursue a broad study instead of solely aiming to replicate Michelagnolo’s works—they wouldn’t have worked in vain and wouldn’t have developed a style that is so difficult, lacking beauty and vibrancy, and poor in creativity. Instead, they could have contributed to both their own growth and the art world by embracing diversity and imitation in various art forms.

Raffaello, then, having made this resolution, and having recognized that Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco had a passing good method of painting, well-grounded draughtsmanship, and a pleasing manner of colouring, although at times, in order to obtain stronger relief, he made too much use of darks, took from him what appeared to him to suit his need and his fancy—namely, a middle course, both in drawing and in colouring; and mingling with that method certain others selected from the best work of other masters, out of many manners he made one, which [Pg 245] was looked upon ever afterwards as his own, and which was and always will be vastly esteemed by all craftsmen. This was then seen perfected in the Sibyls and Prophets of the work that he executed, as has been related, in S. Maria della Pace; in the carrying out of which work he was greatly assisted by having seen the paintings of Michelagnolo in the Chapel of the Pope. And if Raffaello had remained content with this same manner, and had not sought to give it more grandeur and variety in order to prove that he had as good a knowledge of the nude as Michelagnolo, he would not have lost a part of the good name that he had acquired; but the nudes that he made in that apartment of the Borgia Tower where there is the Burning of the Borgo, although they are fine, are not in every way excellent. In like manner, those that were painted likewise by him on the ceiling of the Palace of Agostino Chigi in the Trastevere did not give complete satisfaction, for they are wanting in that grace and sweetness which were peculiar to Raffaello; the reason of which, in great part, was the circumstance that he had them coloured by others after his design. However, repenting of this error, like a man of judgment, he resolved afterwards to execute by himself, without assistance from others, the panel-picture of the Transfiguration of Christ that is in S. Pietro a Montorio, wherein are all those qualities which, as has already been described, are looked for and required in a good picture. And if he had not employed in this work, as it were from caprice, printer's smoke-black, the nature of which, as has been remarked many times, is to become ever darker with time, to the injury of the other colours with which it is mixed, I believe that the picture would still be as fresh as when he painted it; whereas it now appears to be rather a mass of shadows than aught else.

Raffaello, after making this decision and realizing that Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco had a decent painting technique, solid drawing skills, and an appealing coloring style—though he sometimes overused dark colors to create stronger contrast—took from him what he felt suited his needs and tastes. Specifically, he adopted a balanced approach to drawing and coloring, blending in elements from other masters' best works. From this diverse mix, he created a unique style that [Pg 245] was regarded as his own and has always been highly valued by artisans. This style was fully visible in the Sibyls and Prophets of the work he completed in S. Maria della Pace; he was greatly aided by having seen Michelangelo's paintings in the Pope's Chapel. If Raffaello had been content with this method and hadn't tried to showcase his understanding of the nude to rival Michelangelo, he might have preserved more of his good reputation. However, the nudes he painted in the Borgia Tower, where the Burning of the Borgo is depicted, while good, aren’t outstanding. Similarly, those on the ceiling of Agostino Chigi's Palace in Trastevere were also not fully satisfying because they lacked the grace and sweetness characteristic of Raffaello; this was mainly because he had them colored by others based on his design. Realizing this mistake, he wisely resolved to paint the panel picture of the Transfiguration of Christ in S. Pietro a Montorio entirely by himself, where all the qualities expected in a good painting are present. However, if he hadn't whimsically used printer's smoke-black in this work—which, as noted many times, tends to darken over time, affecting the other colors mixed with it—I believe the painting would still look as fresh as the day he completed it; instead, it now seems more like a mass of shadows than anything else.

I have thought fit, almost at the close of this Life, to make this discourse, in order to show with what labour, study, and diligence this honoured craftsman always pursued his art; and even more for the sake of other painters, to the end that they may learn how to avoid those hindrances from which the wisdom and genius of Raffaello were able to deliver him. I must add this as well, that every man should be satisfied and contented with doing that work to which he feels himself drawn by [Pg 246] a natural inclination, and should not seek, out of emulation, to put his hand to that for which nature has not adapted him; for otherwise he will labour in vain, and often to his own shame and loss. Moreover, where striving is enough, no man should aim at super-striving,[27] merely in order to surpass those who, by some great gift of nature, or by some special grace bestowed on them by God, have performed or are performing miracles in art; for the reason that he who is not suited to any particular work, can never reach, let him labour as he may, the goal to which another, with the assistance of nature, has attained with ease. Of this, among the old craftsmen, we may see an example in Paolo Uccello, who, striving against the limitations of his powers, in order to advance, did nothing but go backwards. The same has been done in our own day, no long time since, by Jacopo da Pontormo, and it has been proved by the experience of many others, as we have shown before and will point out yet again. And this, perchance, happens because Heaven always distributes its favours, to the end that every man may rest content with that which falls to him.

I have decided, near the end of this life, to share these thoughts to highlight how much effort, study, and dedication this esteemed craftsman consistently put into his art. More importantly, I want to help other painters learn how to avoid the obstacles that Raffaello’s wisdom and talent allowed him to overcome. I must also emphasize that every person should feel fulfilled doing the work they are naturally inclined toward and should not attempt to compete by pursuing what they aren’t suited for; otherwise, they will struggle in vain and often end up embarrassed and at a loss. Additionally, where effort is sufficient, no one should push themselves excessively just to outdo those who, through a special gift or grace from God, have achieved extraordinary accomplishments in art. A person who isn't suited for a specific task can never reach the level that someone with natural ability achieves effortlessly, regardless of how hard they try. We can see an example of this among the old masters in Paolo Uccello, who, by pushing against his limitations to improve, only ended up regressing. Similarly, not long ago, Jacopo da Pontormo experienced this, as have many others, which I have mentioned before and will reiterate. This might happen because Heaven purposefully distributes its blessings so that everyone can be satisfied with what they receive.

But now, having discoursed on these matters of art, perchance at greater length than was needful, let us return to the life and death of Raffaello. He had a strait friendship with Cardinal Bernardo Divizio of Bibbiena, who had importuned him for many years to take a wife of his choosing; and Raffaello, while not directly refusing to obey the wishes of the Cardinal, had yet put the matter off, saying that he would rather wait till three or four years had passed. This term came upon Raffaello when he was not expecting it, and he was reminded by the Cardinal of his promise; whereupon, seeing himself bound, like the courteous man that he was, he would not break his word, and thus accepted as his wife a niece of that Cardinal. And because he was always very ill content with this entanglement, he continued to delay the matter in such a way that many months passed without the marriage being brought to pass. But it was with no dishonourable motive that he did this, for, having been so many years in the service of the Court, and being [Pg 247] the creditor of Leo for a good sum, it had been hinted to him that when the hall on which he was engaged was finished, the Pope proposed to reward him for his labours and abilities by giving him a red hat, of which he had already determined to distribute a good number, and some of them to men of less merit than Raffaello.

But now, having talked about these art matters, perhaps longer than necessary, let’s go back to the life and death of Raffaello. He had a close friendship with Cardinal Bernardo Divizio of Bibbiena, who had been urging him for many years to marry a woman of his choice. Raffaello, while not outright refusing the Cardinal's wishes, had postponed the matter, saying he’d rather wait for three or four years. That timeframe came unexpectedly for Raffaello, and the Cardinal reminded him of his promise. Seeing himself obligated, being the courteous man he was, he wouldn't go back on his word and thus accepted as his wife a niece of that Cardinal. Since he was never truly happy with this arrangement, he kept delaying the marriage so much that many months passed without it happening. However, he wasn't doing this for any dishonorable reasons; having worked many years for the Court, and being [Pg 247] owed a good amount of money by Leo, he had been hinted that once the hall he was working on was completed, the Pope intended to reward him for his hard work and talent by giving him a red hat, which he had already planned to distribute to several men, including some who were less deserving than Raffaello.

Meanwhile, pursuing his amours in secret, Raffaello continued to divert himself beyond measure with the pleasures of love; whence it happened that, having on one occasion indulged in more than his usual excess, he returned to his house in a violent fever. The physicians, therefore, believing that he had overheated himself, and receiving from him no confession of the excess of which he had been guilty, imprudently bled him, insomuch that he was weakened and felt himself sinking; for he was in need rather of restoratives. Thereupon he made his will: and first, like a good Christian, he sent his mistress out of the house, leaving her the means to live honourably. Next, he divided his possessions among his disciples, Giulio Romano, whom he had always loved dearly, and the Florentine Giovanni Francesco, called Il Fattore, with a priest of Urbino, his kinsman, whose name I do not know. Then he gave orders that some of his wealth should be used for restoring with new masonry one of the ancient tabernacles in S. Maria Ritonda, and for making an altar, with a marble statue of Our Lady, in that church, which he chose as his place of repose and burial after death; and he left all the rest to Giulio and Giovanni Francesco, appointing as executor of his will Messer Baldassarre da Pescia, then Datary to the Pope. Finally, he confessed and was penitent, and ended the course of his life at the age of thirty-seven, on the same day that he was born, which was Good Friday. And even as he embellished the world with his talents, so, it may be believed, does his soul adorn Heaven by its presence.

Meanwhile, while secretly pursuing his love interests, Raffaello continued to indulge excessively in the pleasures of romance. As a result, after one particularly wild night, he returned home suffering from a high fever. The doctors, thinking he had overheated himself and without hearing any confession of his indiscretions, rashly decided to bleed him. This left him weakened and feeling worse, as he actually needed restorative care. He then made his will: first, like a good Christian, he sent his mistress away, ensuring she had enough to live honorably. Next, he divided his belongings between his students, Giulio Romano—whom he always cared for deeply—and the Florentine Giovanni Francesco, known as Il Fattore, along with a priest from Urbino, whose name I do not know. He also instructed that part of his wealth be used to restore one of the old tabernacles in S. Maria Ritonda with new masonry, and to create an altar with a marble statue of Our Lady in that church, which he had chosen as his resting place after death. He left everything else to Giulio and Giovanni Francesco, naming Messer Baldassarre da Pescia, who was then Datary to the Pope, as the executor of his will. Finally, he confessed, showed remorse, and passed away at the age of thirty-seven on Good Friday, the same day he was born. Just as he enriched the world with his talents, it can be believed that his soul now graces Heaven with its presence.

As he lay dead in the hall where he had been working, there was placed at his head the picture of the Transfiguration, which he had executed for Cardinal de' Medici; and the sight of that living picture, in contrast with the dead body, caused the hearts of all who beheld it to burst with sorrow. That work, in memory of the loss of Raffaello, was placed by the Cardinal on the high-altar of S. Pietro a Montorio; and on account [Pg 248] of the nobility of his every action, it was held ever afterwards in great estimation. His body received that honourable burial which his noble spirit had deserved, for there was no craftsman who did not weep with sorrow and follow him to the grave. His death was also a great grief to the whole Court of the Pope, first because he had held in his lifetime the office of Groom of the Chamber, and likewise because he had been so dear to the Pope that his loss caused him to weep bitterly.

As he lay dead in the hallway where he had been working, a picture of the Transfiguration he had painted for Cardinal de' Medici was placed at his head; the sight of that vibrant image next to his lifeless body made the hearts of everyone who saw it break with sorrow. That artwork, created in memory of Raffaello, was put by the Cardinal on the high altar of S. Pietro a Montorio, and due to the nobility of everything he did, it was held in high regard ever since. His body received the honorable burial his noble spirit deserved, as there wasn’t a craftsman who didn’t weep with grief and follow him to the grave. His death also deeply saddened the entire Court of the Pope, partly because he had held the position of Groom of the Chamber in his lifetime, and also because he was so beloved by the Pope that his loss made him weep bitterly.

Baldassare Castiglione.

RAFAELLO SANZIO: BALDASSARE CASTIGLIONE
(Paris: Louvre, 1505. Canvas)
View larger image

RAFAELLO SANZIO: BALDASSARE CASTIGLIONE
(Paris: Louvre, 1505. Canvas)
View larger image

O happy and blessed spirit, in that every man is glad to speak of thee, to celebrate thy actions, and to admire every drawing that thou didst leave to us! When this noble craftsman died, the art of painting might well have died also, seeing that when he closed his eyes, she was left as it were blind. And now for us who have survived him, it remains to imitate the good, nay, the supremely excellent method bequeathed to us by him as a pattern, and, as is called for by his merit and our obligations, to hold a most grateful remembrance of this in our minds, and to pay the highest honour to his memory with our lips. For in truth we have from him art, colouring, and invention harmonized and brought to such a pitch of perfection as could scarcely be hoped for; nor may any intellect ever think to surpass him. And in addition to this benefit that he conferred on art, like a true friend to her, as long as he lived he never ceased to show how one should deal with great men, with those of middle station, and with the lowest. And, indeed, among his extraordinary gifts, I perceive one of such value that I for my part am amazed at it, in that Heaven gave him the power to produce in our art an effect wholly contrary to the nature of us painters, which was that our craftsmen—I do not mean only the lesser, but also those whose humour it was to be great persons; and of this humour art creates a vast number—while working in company with Raffaello, felt themselves naturally united and in such accord, that all evil humours vanished at the sight of him, and every vile and base thought fell away from their minds. Such unity was never greater at any other time than his; and this happened because they were overcome both by his courtesy and by his art, and even more by the good disposition of his nature, which was so full of gentleness and so overflowing with loving-kindness, that it was seen that the very animals, [Pg 249] not to speak of men, honoured him. It is said that if any painter who knew him, and even any who did not know him, asked him for some drawing that he needed, Raffaello would leave his own work in order to assist him. And he always kept a vast number of them employed, aiding them and teaching them with such a love as might have been the due rather of his own children than of fellow-craftsmen; for which reason he was never seen to go to Court without having with him, as he left his house, some fifty painters, all able and excellent, who kept him company in order to do him honour. In short, he lived not like a painter, but like a prince. Wherefore, O art of painting, thou couldst then esteem thyself indeed most blessed, in possessing a craftsman who, both with his genius and his virtues, exalted thee higher than Heaven! Truly happy mightest thou call thyself, in that thy disciples, following in the footsteps of so great a man, have seen how life should be lived, and how important is the union of art and virtue, which, wedded in Raffaello, had strength to prevail on the magnificent Julius II and the magnanimous Leo X, exalted as they were in rank and dignity, to make him their most intimate friend and show him all possible generosity, insomuch that by their favour and by the wealth that they bestowed upon him, he was enabled to do vast honour both to himself and to art. Blessed, also, may be called all those who, employed in his service, worked under him, since whoever imitated him found that he had reached an honourable haven; and in like manner all those who imitate his labours in art will be honoured by the world, even as, by resembling him in uprightness of life, they will win rewards from Heaven.

O happy and blessed spirit, that every person is glad to speak of you, to celebrate your actions, and to admire every piece that you left us! When this noble artist died, the art of painting could very well have died too, because when he closed his eyes, it was left seemingly blind. And now for us who have survived him, it is our duty to emulate the good—indeed, the supremely excellent method he left us as a model, and, as his merit and our responsibilities demand, to keep a deep gratitude for this in our minds and to pay the highest respect to his memory with our words. For in truth, he gave us art, color, and creativity harmonized and perfected to such a degree that it could hardly be hoped for; no intellect may ever think to surpass him. Furthermore, along with this benefit to art, like a true friend to it, he consistently showed how to interact with great individuals, those in between, and those at the bottom. Indeed, among his remarkable gifts, I see one of such immense worth that it amazes me: Heaven granted him the ability to create in our art an effect completely contrary to our nature as painters, which was that our craftsmen—not only the lesser ones, but also those with the ambition to be great—while working alongside Raffaello, felt naturally united and in sync, such that all negativity disappeared in his presence, and every vile thought fell away from their minds. Such unity was never greater than during his time; this was due to being overcome by his kindness and his art, and even more so by his gentle nature, which was so filled with compassion that even animals, [Pg 249] let alone people, honored him. It’s said that if any painter who knew him—indeed, even those who didn’t—asked him for a drawing they needed, Raffaello would leave his own work to help. He always kept a large number of them busy, teaching them with a love that seemed more appropriate for children than fellow craftsmen; for this reason, he was never seen at court without taking with him, as he left home, about fifty skilled and excellent painters who accompanied him to honor him. In short, he lived not as a painter, but as a prince. Therefore, O art of painting, you could indeed consider yourself most blessed, possessing a craftsman who, with both his genius and virtues, lifted you higher than Heaven! Truly happy could you call yourself, knowing that your disciples, following in the footsteps of such a great man, learned how to live life and how important it is to merge art and virtue, which, united in Raffaello, were strong enough to inspire the magnificent Julius II and the noble Leo X, exalted in both rank and dignity, to make him their closest friend and shower him with generosity, so much so that their favor and the wealth they granted him allowed him to bring great honor to himself and to art. Blessed, too, may all those who worked under him be called, as anyone who emulated him found they reached an honorable destination; likewise, anyone who imitates his artistic works will be honored by the world, just as, by living uprightly like him, they will earn rewards from Heaven.

Raffaello received from Bembo the following epitaph:

Raffaello got this epitaph from Bembo:

D. O. M.
RAPHAELLI SANCTIO JOAN. F. URBINAT.
PICTORI EMINENTISS. VETERUMQUE ÆMULO,
CUJUS SPIRANTEIS PROPE IMAGINEIS
SI CONTEMPLERE,
NATURÆ ATQUE ARTIS FŒDUS
FACILE INSPEXERIS.
JULII II ET LEONIS X PONTT. MAXX.
PICTURÆ ET ARCHITECT. OPERIBUS
GLORIAM AUXIT.
[Pg 250] VIXIT AN. XXXVII, INTEGER, INTEGROS.
QUO DIE NATUS EST, EO ESSE DESIIT,
VIII ID. APRIL. MDXX.

D. O. M.
RAPHAEL SANCTION JOAN. F. URBINO.
TO THE DISTINGUISHED PAINTER AND RIVAL OF THE ANCIENTS,
WHOSE LIVING IMAGES,
IF YOU CONTEMPLATE,
YOU WILL EASILY SEE THE UNION
OF NATURE AND ART.
DURING THE REIGNS OF JULIUS II AND LEO X.
HE ENHANCED THE GLORY
OF PAINTINGS AND ARCHITECTURE.
[Pg 250] LIVED 37 YEARS, WHOLE AND INTEGRAL.
ON THE DAY HE WAS BORN, HE CEASED TO BE,
8TH OF APRIL, 1520.

ILLE HIC EST RAPHAEL, TIMUIT QUO SOSPITE VINCI
RERUM MAGNA PARENS, ET MORIENTE MORI.

ILLE HIC EST RAPHAEL, TIMUIT QUO SOSPITE VINCI
RERUM MAGNA PARENS, ET MORIENTE MORI.

And Count Baldassarre Castiglione wrote of his death in the following manner:

And Count Baldassarre Castiglione wrote about his death like this:

Quod lacerum corpus medica sanaverit arte,
Hyppolitum Stygiis et revocarit aquis,
Ad Stygias ipse est raptus Epidaurius undas;
Sic precium vitæ mors fuit artifici.
Tu quoque dum toto laniatam corpore Romam
Componis miro, Raphael, ingenio,
Atque urbis lacerum ferro, igni, annisque cadaver,
Ad vitam antiquum jam revocasque decus,
Movisti superum invidiam, indignataque mors est
Te dudum extinctis reddere posse animam,
Et quod longa dies paulatim aboleverat, hoc te
Mortali spreta lege parare iterum.
Sic, miser, heu, prima cadis intercepte juventa,
Deberi et morti nostraque nosque mones.

Quod lacerum corpus medica sanaverit arte,
Hyppolitum from the Stygian waters,
Ad Stygias ipse est raptus Epidaurius undas;
Thus, the price of life was death for the artist.
Tu quoque dum toto laniatam corpore Romam
Componis miro, Raphael, genius,
Atque urbis lacerum ferro, igni, annisque cadaver,
You now call back the glory of ancient times,
Movisti superum invidiam, indignataque mors est
You can bring back a soul after it has been extinguished.
Et quod longa dies paulatim aboleverat, hoc te
Mortals ignored the law prepare again.
Sic, miser, heu, prima cadis intercepte juventa,
You should remind us of our duty and death.


[Pg 251] GUGLIELMO DA MARCILLA


[Pg 253] LIFE OF GUGLIELMO DA MARCILLA

[GUILLAUME DE MARCILLAC, OR THE FRENCH PRIOR]

FRENCH PAINTER AND MASTER OF GLASS WINDOWS

At this same time, wherein our arts were endowed by God with the greatest felicity that they could possibly enjoy, there flourished one Guglielmo da Marcilla, a Frenchman, who, from his constant residence in Arezzo, and from the affection that he bore to that city, may be said to have chosen it for his country, insomuch that all men considered and called him an Aretine. And, in truth, among the benefits that are derived from ability, one is that from whatever strange and distant region and from however barbarous and unknown a race a man may come, be he who he may, if only he has a mind adorned with ability and practises some ingenious craft with his hands, no sooner does he make his first appearance in each city to which he turns his steps, demonstrating his worth, than the skill of his hand works so powerfully, that his name, passing from lip to lip, in a short time waxes great, and his qualities become very highly prized and honoured. And it happens often to a great number of men, who have left their country far behind them, that they chance upon nations that are lovers of ability and of foreigners, where, by reason of their upright walk of life, they find themselves recognized and cherished in such a manner, that they forget the country of their birth and choose a new one for their last resting-place.

At this same time, when our arts were blessed by God with the greatest happiness they could experience, there was a guy named Guglielmo da Marcilla, a Frenchman, who spent so much time in Arezzo and had such a fondness for that city that he basically adopted it as his home. Because of this, people regarded and called him an Aretine. In reality, one of the great advantages of talent is that no matter where someone comes from, whether it's a strange, distant place or an unknown, primitive culture, as long as they have a mind filled with skill and are able to create something clever with their hands, the moment they arrive in a new city and show their worth, their talent makes such an impact that their name quickly spreads among the people, and their skills are highly valued and respected. It's common for many people who have left their homelands far behind to find themselves in nations that appreciate talent and welcome outsiders. Here, thanks to their straightforward way of living, they are recognized and embraced in such a way that they forget their birthplace and choose a new country as their final home.

Even so was Arezzo chosen as a final home by Guglielmo, who, as a youth in France, applied himself to the art of design, and together with that gave attention to glass windows, in which he made figures no less harmonious in colouring than if they had been painted with the greatest beauty and harmony in oils. While in his own country, persuaded by [Pg 254] the entreaties of certain of his friends, he was present at the slaying of one who was their enemy: on which account he was forced to assume the habit of a monk in the Order of S. Dominic in France, in order to escape the courts and the hand of justice. But although he remained in that Order, yet he never abandoned the study of art; nay, continuing it, he arrived at the highest perfection.

Even so, Guglielmo chose Arezzo as his final home. As a young man in France, he focused on design and also worked on glass windows, creating figures that were just as harmonious in color as if they had been painted with the greatest beauty and harmony in oils. While he was back in his own country, persuaded by [Pg 254] the pleas of some friends, he found himself present at the killing of one of their enemies. As a result, he was forced to adopt the habit of a monk in the Order of S. Dominic in France to avoid the courts and the law. However, even though he remained in that Order, he never gave up his study of art; in fact, he continued it and reached the highest level of perfection.

Now, by order of Pope Julius II, a commission was given to Bramante da Urbino to have a number of glass windows made for the Palace; whereupon he, making inquiries about the most excellent craftsmen, received information of many who were working at that craft, and among them of some who were executing marvellous works in France; and of these he saw a specimen through the French Ambassador who was then at the Court of his Holiness, and who had in the frame of a window in his study a figure executed on a piece of white glass with a vast number of colours, fixed on the glass by the action of fire. Wherefore, by order of Bramante, a letter was written to France, inviting them to come to Rome, and offering them good payments. Thereupon Maestro Claudio, a Frenchman, the head of that art, having received the intelligence, and knowing the excellence of Guglielmo, so went to work with money and fair promises, that it was no difficult matter to draw him out of the convent, particularly because Guglielmo, on account of the discourtesy shown to him and the jealousies that there always are among monks, was even more eager to leave it than was Maestro Claudio to get him out. They went, therefore, to Rome, where the habit of S. Dominic was changed for that of S. Peter.

Now, by order of Pope Julius II, a commission was given to Bramante da Urbino to have several glass windows made for the Palace. He inquired about the best craftsmen and learned about many who were skilled in that craft, including some who were creating amazing works in France. He saw an example through the French Ambassador, who was at the Court of His Holiness, and who had a figure displayed in the frame of a window in his study, made on a piece of white glass showcasing numerous colors, fixed onto the glass by fire. Therefore, on Bramante's orders, a letter was sent to France, inviting them to come to Rome and offering good payments. Consequently, Maestro Claudio, a Frenchman and the leader in that art, received the news, and knowing about the excellence of Guglielmo, worked with money and good promises to persuade him out of the convent. This was not difficult since Guglielmo, due to the discourtesy shown to him and the usual jealousies among monks, was even more eager to leave than Maestro Claudio was to get him out. They then went to Rome, where Guglielmo changed from the habit of S. Dominic to that of S. Peter.

Bramante at that time had caused two windows of travertine to be made in the Palace of the Pope, which were in the hall in front of the chapel, now embellished by a vaulted ceiling by Antonio da San Gallo, and by marvellous stucco-work from the hand of Perino del Vaga of Florence. These windows were executed by Maestro Claudio and Guglielmo, although afterwards, during the sack of Rome, they were broken to pieces, in order to extract the lead to make harquebus-balls; and they were truly marvellous. In addition to these, they made an endless number of them for the apartments of the Pope, which met with the same [Pg 255] fate as the other two. And even now there is one to be seen in the room containing Raffaello's Burning of the Borgo, in the Borgia Tower; in which are angels who are holding the escutcheon of Leo X. They also made two windows for the chapel behind the Madonna in S. Maria del Popolo, with the stories of her life, which were highly praiseworthy examples of that craft.

Bramante, at that time, had two travertine windows made in the Pope's Palace, located in the hall in front of the chapel, which is now adorned with a vaulted ceiling by Antonio da San Gallo and stunning stucco work by Perino del Vaga from Florence. These windows were created by Maestro Claudio and Guglielmo, but later, during the sack of Rome, they were smashed to retrieve the lead for making harquebus balls; they were truly incredible. In addition to these, many more were made for the Pope's apartments, which met the same [Pg 255] fate as the other two. Even now, one can be seen in the room displaying Raffaello's Burning of the Borgo, in the Borgia Tower, featuring angels holding the shield of Leo X. They also created two windows for the chapel behind the Madonna in S. Maria del Popolo, depicting scenes from her life, which were exemplary pieces of that craft.

These works brought them no less fame and renown than comfort in life. But Maestro Claudio, being very intemperate in eating and drinking, according to the custom of his race, which is a deadly thing in the air of Rome, fell sick of so violent a fever, that in six days he passed to the other life. Whereupon Guglielmo, left alone, and almost like one lost without his companion, painted by himself a window, likewise of glass, in S. Maria de Anima, the church of the Germans in Rome; which was the reason that Cardinal Silvio of Cortona made him an offer, and made a contract with him that he should execute some windows and other works in his native city of Cortona. Wherefore the Cardinal took him in his company to take up his abode in Cortona; and the first work that he executed was the façade of the Cardinal's house on the side towards the Piazza, which he painted in chiaroscuro, depicting therein Croton and the other original founders of that city. Thereupon the Cardinal, who saw that Guglielmo was no less upright as a man than excellent as a master of that art, caused him to execute, for the Pieve of Cortona, the window of the principal chapel, in which he made the Nativity of Christ and the Magi adoring Him.

These works brought them just as much fame and recognition as they did comfort in life. However, Maestro Claudio, being quite excessive in his eating and drinking, as was typical for his culture—something that is unhealthy in the climate of Rome—fell ill with such a severe fever that he passed away in six days. Left alone and feeling almost lost without his companion, Guglielmo painted a glass window by himself for S. Maria de Anima, the German church in Rome. This led Cardinal Silvio of Cortona to make him an offer and enter into a contract for him to create some windows and other works in his hometown of Cortona. Consequently, the Cardinal brought him along to settle in Cortona; the first project he completed was the façade of the Cardinal’s house facing the Piazza, which he painted in chiaroscuro, depicting Croton and the other original founders of that city. Seeing that Guglielmo was as honorable as he was talented in his art, the Cardinal commissioned him to create the main chapel window for the Pieve of Cortona, where he illustrated the Nativity of Christ with the Magi adoring Him.

Guglielmo was a man of fine spirit and intelligence, and of very great mastery in handling glass, and particularly in so distributing the colours that the brightest should come in the foremost figures, those in the other figures being darker in proportion as they receded; in which point he was a rare and truly excellent master. Moreover, he showed very good judgment in the painting of his figures; whereby he executed them with such unity, that they fell back into the distance little by little, in such a way that they did not cling either to the buildings or to the landscapes, and had the appearance of being painted on panel, or rather in relief. He showed invention and variety in the composition of scenes, [Pg 256] making them rich and well grouped; and he rendered easy the process of making such pictures as are put together out of pieces of glass, which was held to be very difficult, as indeed it is for one who has not his skill and dexterity. He designed the pictures for his windows with such good method and order, that the mountings of lead and iron, which cross them in certain places, were so well fitted into the joinings of the figures and the folds of the draperies, that they cannot be seen—nay, they gave the whole such grace, that the brush could not have done more—and thus he was able to make a virtue of necessity.

Guglielmo was a man of great spirit and intelligence, with exceptional skill in working with glass, especially in arranging the colors so that the brightest appeared in the front figures, while those in the background were darker in proportion as they faded into the distance; in this, he was a truly remarkable master. Additionally, he displayed excellent judgment in painting his figures, executing them with such unity that they gradually receded, creating the illusion that they were not clinging to the buildings or landscapes, but rather were painted on a panel, or even in relief. He demonstrated creativity and variety in his scene compositions, [Pg 256] making them rich and well-arranged; and he simplified the process of creating pictures made from pieces of glass, which was considered very challenging, especially for anyone lacking his skill and dexterity. He designed the pictures for his windows with such organization and clarity that the lead and iron mounts crossing them at certain points blended seamlessly into the joins of the figures and the folds of the draperies, making them almost invisible—in fact, they added such elegance that a brush couldn't have achieved more—and thus he turned a necessity into a virtue.

Guglielmo used only two kinds of colour for the shading of such glass as he proposed to subject to the action of fire; one was scale of iron, and the other scale of copper. That of iron, which is dark, served to shade draperies, hair, and buildings; and the other, that of copper, which produces a tawny tint, served for flesh colours. He also made much use of a hard stone that comes from Flanders and France, called at the present day hematite, which is red in colour and is much employed for burnishing gold. This, having first been pounded in a bronze mortar, and then ground with an iron brazing instrument on a plate of copper or yellow brass, and tempered with gum, works divinely well on glass.

Guglielmo used only two types of color for shading the glass he intended to expose to fire: one was iron scale, and the other was copper scale. The iron scale, which is dark, was used to shade draperies, hair, and buildings; the copper scale, which gives a tawny hue, was used for skin tones. He also frequently used a hard stone from Flanders and France, now known as hematite, which is red and is often used for burnishing gold. This stone, after being crushed in a bronze mortar and then ground with an iron tool on a plate of copper or yellow brass, mixed with gum, works exceptionally well on glass.

When Guglielmo first arrived in Rome, he was no great draughtsman, although he was well practised in every other respect. But having recognized the need of this, he applied himself to the study of drawing, in spite of his being well advanced in years; and thus little by little he achieved the improvement that is evident in the windows that he afterwards made for the Palace of the said Cardinal at Cortona, and for the other without the city, in a round window that is in the aforesaid Pieve, over the façade, on the right hand as one enters the church, wherein are the arms of Pope Leo X, and likewise in two little windows that are in the Company of Gesù, in one of which is a Christ, and in the other a S. Onofrio. These are no little different from his early works, and much better.

When Guglielmo first got to Rome, he wasn't a great draftsman, even though he was skilled in many other areas. But realizing he needed to improve this skill, he dedicated himself to learning drawing, even though he was already older. Gradually, he made noticeable progress, which is clear in the windows he later created for the Cardinal's Palace in Cortona, and for another round window located in the aforementioned Pieve, over the façade on the right side as you enter the church, which features the arms of Pope Leo X, as well as in two small windows at the Company of Gesù, one depicting Christ and the other St. Onofrio. These are quite different from his earlier works and are significantly better.

Now while Guglielmo, as has been related, was living in Cortona, there died at Arezzo one Fabiano di Stagio Sassoli, an Aretine, who had been a very good master of the making of large windows. Thereupon the Wardens of Works for the Vescovado gave the commission for three [Pg 257] windows in the principal chapel, each twenty braccia in height, to Stagio, the son of the said Fabiano, and to the painter Domenico Pecori; but when these were finished and fixed in their places, they gave no great satisfaction to the Aretines, although they were passing good and rather worthy of praise than otherwise. It happened at this time that Messer Lodovico Belichini, an excellent physician, and one of the first men in the government of the city of Arezzo, went to Cortona to cure the mother of the aforesaid Cardinal; and there he became well acquainted with our Guglielmo, with whom, when he had time, he was very willing to converse. And Guglielmo, who was then called the Prior, from his having received about that time the benefice of a priory, likewise conceived an affection for that physician, who asked him one day whether, with the good will of the Cardinal, he would go to Arezzo to execute some windows; at which Guglielmo promised that he would, and with the permission and good will of the Cardinal he made his way to that city. Now Stagio, of whom we have spoken above, having parted from the company of Domenico, received Guglielmo into his house; and the latter, for his first work, executed for a window of the Chapel of S. Lucia, belonging to the Albergotti, in the Vescovado of Arezzo, that Saint and a S. Sylvester, in so good a manner that the work may truly be said to be made with living figures, and not of coloured and transparent glass, or at least to be a picture worthy of praise and marvellous. For besides the mastery shown in the flesh-colours, the glasses are flashed; that is, in some places the first skin has been removed, and the glass then coloured with another tint; by which is meant, for example, the placing of yellow over red flashed glass, or the application of white and green over blue; which is a difficult and even miraculous thing in this craft. The first or true colour, then, such as red, blue, or green, covers the whole of one side; and the other part, which is as thick as the blade of a knife, or a little more, is white. Many, being afraid that they might break the glasses, on account of their lack of skill in handling them, do not employ a pointed iron for removing that layer, but in place of this, for greater safety, set about grinding the glasses with a copper wheel fixed on the end of an iron instrument; and thus, little by little, by the use of emery, they contrive to leave only a layer of [Pg 258] white glass, which turns out very clear. Then, if a yellow colour has to be applied to the piece of glass thus left white, at the moment when it is to be placed into the furnace for firing, it is painted by means of a brush with calcined silver, which is a colour similar to bole, but somewhat thick; and in the fire this melts over the glass, fuses, and takes a firm hold, penetrating into the glass and making a very beautiful yellow. These methods of working no one used better, or with more ingenuity and art, than Prior Guglielmo; and it is in these things that the difficulty consists, for painting the glass with oil-colours or in any other manner is little or nothing, and that it should be diaphanous or transparent is not a matter of much importance, whereas firing it in the furnace and making it such that it will withstand the action of water and remain fresh for ever, is a difficult work and well worthy of praise. Wherefore this excellent master deserves the highest praise, since there is not a man of his profession who has done as much, whether in design, or invention, or colouring, or general excellence.

While Guglielmo was living in Cortona, Fabiano di Stagio Sassoli, a talented maker of large windows from Arezzo, passed away. The Wardens of Works for the Vescovado then commissioned Stagio, Fabiano's son, and painter Domenico Pecori to create three [Pg 257] windows for the main chapel, each twenty braccia tall. However, once they were installed, the Aretines were not very satisfied with them, despite their decent quality and praise-worthy aspects. During this time, Messer Lodovico Belichini, an excellent physician and a prominent figure in Arezzo’s government, visited Cortona to treat the Cardinal’s mother. He got to know Guglielmo well and enjoyed conversing with him whenever he had the time. Guglielmo, who was then called the Prior after receiving a priory benefice, also grew fond of the physician. One day, Lodovico asked if, with the Cardinal's approval, Guglielmo would come to Arezzo to work on some windows. Guglielmo agreed and, with the Cardinal's permission, went to the city. Stagio, previously mentioned, having separated from Domenico, welcomed Guglielmo into his home. For his first project, Guglielmo created a window for the Chapel of S. Lucia, belonging to the Albergotti, depicting Saint Lucia and S. Sylvester. The work was so skillfully executed that it could truly be mistaken for living figures rather than just colored and transparent glass, or at the very least, it could be called a remarkable picture. In addition to the mastery shown in the flesh tones, the glasses used were flashed; that is, the top layer was removed in some spots, and the glass was colored with another hue. For instance, yellow might be layered over red flashed glass, or white and green applied over blue, which is quite challenging and almost miraculous in this craft. The true color, like red, blue, or green, covers one side entirely, while the other side, as thick as a knife blade or slightly more, remains white. Many people, fearing they might break the glasses due to their lack of skill, avoid using a pointed iron for this layer removal. Instead, for safety, they grind the glass with a copper wheel attached to an iron tool, gradually using emery to leave just a thin layer of [Pg 258] white glass that turns out very clear. If a yellow color needs to be applied to the white glass, it is brushed on with calcined silver right before being placed in the furnace. This color resembles bole but is thicker; in the fire, it melts, fuses, and penetrates the glass, creating a beautiful yellow. No one used these techniques better or with more ingenuity and artistry than Prior Guglielmo. The real challenge lies in firing the glass to ensure it withstands water and remains clear forever; executing that well is a significant achievement deserving high praise. Thus, this excellent master earns the utmost acclaim, as no one in his trade has accomplished as much in terms of design, invention, coloring, or overall excellence.

He then made the great round-window of the same church, containing the Descent of the Holy Spirit, and likewise the Baptism of Christ by S. John, wherein he represented Christ in the Jordan, awaiting S. John, who has taken a cup of water in order to baptize Him, while a nude old man is taking off his shoes, and some angels are preparing Christ's raiment, and on high is the Father, sending down the Holy Spirit upon His Son. This window is over the baptismal font of that Duomo, for which he also executed the window containing the Resurrection of Lazarus on the fourth day after death; wherein it seems impossible that he could have included in so small a space such a number of figures, in which may be recognized the terror and amazement of the people, with the stench from the body of Lazarus, whose resurrection causes his two sisters to rejoice amid their tears. In this work are innumerable colours, flashed one over the other in the glass, and every least thing truly appears most natural in its own kind.

He then created the large round window for the same church, depicting the Descent of the Holy Spirit, as well as the Baptism of Christ by St. John. In this scene, he shows Christ in the Jordan River, waiting for St. John, who is holding a cup of water to baptize Him, while an elderly man is taking off his shoes, and some angels are getting Christ’s robe ready. Above, the Father sends down the Holy Spirit upon His Son. This window is situated above the baptismal font of that Duomo, for which he also designed the window illustrating the Resurrection of Lazarus on the fourth day after his death. It seems incredible that he could fit so many figures into such a small space, capturing the fear and astonishment of the onlookers, along with the smell from Lazarus’s body, whose resurrection brings joy to his two sisters amidst their tears. This work features countless colors layered over one another in the glass, and every detail appears incredibly lifelike.

And whoever wishes to learn how much the hand of the Prior was able to effect in this art, should study the window of S. Matthew over the Chapel of that Apostle, and observe the marvellous invention of that scene, [Pg 259] wherein he can see a living figure of Christ calling Matthew from his tables, while Matthew, following Him and stretching out his arms to receive Him, abandons the riches and treasures that he has acquired. And at the same time an Apostle may be seen in a very spirited attitude, awaking another who has fallen asleep on some steps; and in like manner there may also be perceived a S. Peter speaking with S. John, both being so beautiful that they seem truly divine. In this same window are temples in perspective, staircases, and figures so well grouped, and landscapes so natural, that one would never think it was glass, but rather a thing rained down from Heaven for the consolation of mankind. In the same place he made the window of S. Anthony and that of S. Nicholas, both most beautiful, with two others, one containing the scene of Christ driving the traders from the Temple, and the other that of the woman taken in adultery; all these works being held to be truly excellent and marvellous.

And anyone who wants to see how skilled the Prior was in this art should check out the window of St. Matthew above the Chapel of that Apostle. They’ll notice the incredible design of that scene, [Pg 259], where you can see a living figure of Christ calling Matthew away from his tables, and Matthew, following Him and reaching out his arms to welcome Him, leaves behind the riches he has gathered. At the same time, you can see an Apostle in an animated pose, waking up another who has fallen asleep on some steps; similarly, there’s St. Peter talking to St. John, both looking so beautiful that they truly seem divine. This window also features temples in perspective, staircases, and figures arranged so well, along with landscapes that look so realistic, that you’d think it wasn’t glass, but rather something sent down from Heaven for the comfort of humanity. In that same place, he created the window of St. Anthony and that of St. Nicholas, both very beautiful, along with two other windows: one showing Christ driving out the traders from the Temple, and the other depicting the woman caught in adultery. All these works are regarded as truly excellent and marvelous.

So fully were the labours and abilities of the Prior recognized by the Aretines, what with praises, favours, and rewards, and so satisfied and contented was he by this result, that he resolved to adopt that city as his home, and to change himself from a Frenchman into an Aretine. Afterwards, reflecting in his own mind that the art of glass-painting, on account of the destruction that takes place every moment in such works, was no lasting one, there came to him a desire to devote himself to painting, and he therefore undertook to execute for the Wardens of Works of the Vescovado in that city three very large vaults in fresco, thinking thus to leave a memorial of himself behind him. The Aretines, in return for this, presented to him a farm that belonged to the Confraternity of S. Maria della Misericordia, near their city, with some excellent houses, for his enjoyment during his lifetime. And they ordained that when the work was finished, its value should be estimated by some distinguished craftsman, and that the Wardens should make this good to him in full. Whereupon he made up his mind to show his worth in this undertaking, and he made his figures very large on account of the height, after the manner of the works in Michelagnolo's chapel. And so mightily did his wish to become excellent in such an art avail in him, that although he was fifty years of age, he improved little by little in such a manner, [Pg 260] that he showed that his knowledge and comprehension of the beautiful were not less than his delight in imitating the good in the execution of his work. He went on to represent the earlier events of the New Testament, even as in the three large works he had depicted the beginning of the Old. For this reason, therefore, I am inclined to believe that any man of genius who has the desire to attain to perfection, is able, if he will but take the pains, to make naught of the limits of any science. At the beginning of those works, indeed, he was alarmed by their size, and because he had never executed any before; which was the reason that he sent to Rome for Maestro Giovanni, a French miniaturist, who, coming to Arezzo, painted over S. Antonio an arch with a Christ in fresco, and for that Company the banner that is carried in processions, which he executed with great diligence, having received the commission for them from the Prior.

The Aretines recognized the Prior’s hard work and skills so much—through praise, favors, and rewards—and he was so pleased with this that he decided to make the city his home and to transform from a Frenchman to an Aretine. Later, realizing that the art of glass-painting wasn’t permanent due to the constant destruction of such works, he felt the urge to pursue painting instead. He took on the task of creating three large frescoed vaults for the Wardens of Works of the Vescovado in that city, hoping to leave a lasting legacy. In gratitude, the Aretines gifted him a farm owned by the Confraternity of S. Maria della Misericordia, located near their city, along with some excellent houses for his enjoyment during his lifetime. They also arranged for the work’s value to be assessed by a renowned craftsman upon completion, with the Wardens promising to pay him in full. Determined to prove his skills in this project, he painted his figures large to suit the height, inspired by the works in Michelangelo’s chapel. His desire to excel in this art was so strong that even at fifty, he gradually improved, showing that his understanding of beauty was as strong as his enjoyment of skillfully executing his work. He went on to depict earlier events from the New Testament, just as he had illustrated the beginnings of the Old Testament in his three large works. For this reason, I believe that any person of talent who aims for perfection can, with effort, push beyond the limits of any field. At first, the scale of those works intimidated him since he had never done anything that large before, which is why he sent for Maestro Giovanni, a French miniaturist, to come to Arezzo. Giovanni painted a fresco of Christ on an arch over S. Antonio and created the banner for the company used in processions, completing these commissions with great care after being asked by the Prior.

At the same time Guglielmo made the round window for the façade of the Church of S. Francesco, a great work, in which he represented the Pope in Consistory, with the Conclave of Cardinals, and S. Francis going to Rome for the confirmation of his Rule and bearing the roses of January. In this work he proved what a master of composition he was, so that it may be said with truth that he was born for that profession; nor may any craftsman ever think to equal him in beauty, in abundance of figures, or in grace. There are innumerable windows executed by him throughout that city, all most beautiful, such as the great round window in the Madonna delle Lacrime, containing the Assumption of Our Lady and the Apostles, and a very beautiful window with an Annunciation; a round window with the Marriage of the Virgin, and another containing a S. Jerome executed for the Spadari, and likewise three other windows below, in various parts of the church; with a most beautiful round window with the Nativity of Christ in the Church of S. Girolamo, and another in S. Rocco. He sent some, also, to various places, such as Castiglione del Lago, and one to Florence for Lodovico Capponi, to be set up in S. Felicita, where there is the panel by Jacopo da Pontormo, a most excellent painter, and the chapel adorned by him with mural paintings in oils and in fresco and with panel-pictures; which window came into the [Pg 261] hands of the Frati Ingesuati in Florence, who worked at that craft, and they took it all to pieces in order to learn how it was made, removing many pieces as specimens and replacing them with new ones, so that in the end they made quite a different window.

At the same time Guglielmo created the round window for the façade of the Church of S. Francesco, a significant work that depicted the Pope in Consistory, surrounded by the Conclave of Cardinals, and St. Francis traveling to Rome for the approval of his Rule while carrying the roses of January. In this piece, he showcased his masterful composition skills, proving that he was truly destined for this profession; no other craftsman could hope to match him in beauty, variety of figures, or elegance. He has executed countless stunning windows throughout the city, including the grand round window in the Madonna delle Lacrime, which features the Assumption of Our Lady and the Apostles, a beautiful window with an Annunciation, a round window depicting the Marriage of the Virgin, and another of St. Jerome made for the Spadari, along with three additional windows located in different parts of the church; there is also an exquisite round window showing the Nativity of Christ in the Church of S. Girolamo, and another one in S. Rocco. He also sent some to various locations, such as Castiglione del Lago, and one to Florence for Lodovico Capponi, to be installed in S. Felicita, which houses the artwork by Jacopo da Pontormo, an outstanding painter, along with the chapel he decorated with oil and fresco murals and panel paintings; this window ended up in the [Pg 261] possession of the Frati Ingesuati in Florence, who practiced that craft, and they dismantled it to learn how it was made, taking many pieces as samples and replacing them with new ones, ultimately creating a completely different window.

He also conceived the wish to paint in oils, and for the Chapel of the Conception in S. Francesco at Arezzo he executed a panel-picture wherein are some vestments very well painted, and many heads most lifelike, and so beautiful that he was honoured thereby ever afterwards, seeing that this was the first work that he had ever done in oils.

He also had the desire to paint with oils, and for the Chapel of the Conception in S. Francesco at Arezzo, he created a panel painting featuring well-painted garments and many lifelike heads, so beautiful that he was honored for it thereafter, as this was the first work he had ever done in oils.

The Prior was a very honourable person, and delighted in agriculture and in making alterations in buildings; wherefore, having bought a most beautiful house, he made in it a vast number of improvements. As a man of religion, he was always most upright in his ways; and the remorse of conscience, on account of his departure from his convent, kept him sorely afflicted. For which reason he made a very beautiful window for the Chapel of the High-altar in S. Domenico, a convent of his Order at Arezzo; wherein he depicted a vine that issues from the body of S. Dominic and embraces a great number of sanctified friars, who constitute the tree of the Order; and at the highest point is Our Lady, with Christ, who is marrying S. Catherine of Siena—a work much extolled and of great mastery, for which he would accept no payment, believing himself to be much indebted to that Order. He sent a very beautiful window to S. Lorenzo in Perugia, and an endless number of others to many places round Arezzo.

The Prior was a very honorable person who loved farming and renovating buildings. After purchasing a stunning house, he made numerous improvements to it. As a man of faith, he was always very upright in his actions, and the guilt from leaving his convent weighed heavily on him. This is why he created a beautiful window for the High Altar Chapel at S. Domenico, a convent of his Order in Arezzo; it depicted a vine coming from the body of S. Dominic, wrapping around many holy friars who represent the tree of the Order. At the top, there is Our Lady, with Christ, who is marrying S. Catherine of Siena—a work highly praised and masterful. He refused any payment for it, feeling he owed much to that Order. He also sent a stunning window to S. Lorenzo in Perugia, along with countless others to various places around Arezzo.

And because he took much pleasure in matters of architecture, he made for the citizens of that country a number of designs of buildings and adornments for their city, such as the two doors of S. Rocco in stone, and the ornament of grey-stone that was added to the panel-picture of Maestro Luca in S. Girolamo; and he designed an ornament in the Abbey of Cipriano d' Anghiari, and another for the Company of the Trinità in the Chapel of the Crocifisso, and a very rich lavatory for the sacristy; which were all executed with great perfection by the stone-cutter Santi.

And because he really enjoyed architecture, he created several designs for buildings and decorations for the citizens of that country, like the two stone doors of S. Rocco and the grey-stone ornament that was added to Maestro Luca's panel painting in S. Girolamo. He also designed an ornament for the Abbey of Cipriano d'Anghiari, another for the Company of the Trinità in the Chapel of the Crocifisso, and a very elaborate lavatory for the sacristy. All of these were crafted with great skill by the stone-cutter Santi.

Finally, ever delighting in labour, and continually working both winter and summer at his mural painting, which breaks down the [Pg 262] healthiest of men, he became so afflicted by the damp and so swollen with dropsy, that his physicians had to tap him, and in a few days he rendered up his soul to Him who had given it. First, like a good Christian, he partook of the Sacraments of the Church, and made his will. Then, having a particular devotion for the Hermits of Camaldoli, who have their seat on the summit of the Apennines, twenty miles distant from Arezzo, he bequeathed to them his property and his body, and to Pastorino da Siena, his assistant, who had been with him many years, he left his glasses, his working-instruments, and his designs, of which there is one in our book, a scene of the Submersion of Pharaoh in the Red Sea.

Finally, always enjoying his work and continuously painting murals in both winter and summer, which takes a toll even on the strongest of men, he became so troubled by the dampness and so swollen with dropsy that his doctors had to drain him. A few days later, he passed away, returning his soul to the One who gave it. First, as a good Christian, he received the sacraments and made his will. Then, having a special devotion to the Hermits of Camaldoli, who are located on the summit of the Apennines, twenty miles from Arezzo, he left them his property and his body. To Pastorino da Siena, his assistant who had been with him many years, he gave his glasses, his tools, and his designs, one of which, featured in our book, shows the drowning of Pharaoh in the Red Sea.

This Pastorino afterwards applied himself to many other fields of art, and also to glass windows, although the works that he produced in that craft were but few. Guglielmo was much imitated, also, by one Maso Porro of Cortona, who was more able in firing and putting together the glass than in painting it. One of the pupils of Guglielmo was Battista Borro of Arezzo, who continues to imitate him greatly in the making of windows; and he also taught the first rudiments to Benedetto Spadari and to Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo.

This Pastorino later devoted himself to various other art forms, including stained glass, although the pieces he created in that medium were limited. Guglielmo was also widely imitated by Maso Porro from Cortona, who was better at firing and assembling the glass than painting it. One of Guglielmo's students was Battista Borro from Arezzo, who continues to closely follow his style in making windows. He also taught the basics to Benedetto Spadari and Giorgio Vasari from Arezzo.

The Prior lived sixty-two years, and died in the year 1537. He deserves infinite praise, in that by him there was brought into Tuscany the art of working in glass with the greatest mastery and delicacy that could be desired. Wherefore, since he conferred such great benefits upon us, we also will pay him honour, exalting him continually with loving and unceasing praise both for his life and for his works.

The Prior lived for sixty-two years and passed away in 1537. He deserves endless praise because he brought to Tuscany the skill of working with glass in a remarkable and delicate way. Therefore, since he gave us such great benefits, we will also honor him, continually praising him with love and admiration for both his life and his contributions.


[Pg 263] SIMONE


[Pg 265] LIFE OF SIMONE, CALLED IL CRONACA

[SIMONE DEL POLLAIUOLO]

ARCHITECT OF FLORENCE

Many intellects are lost that would make rare and worthy works, if, on coming into the world, they were to hit upon persons able and willing to set them to work on those labours for which they are fitted. But it often happens that he who has the means is neither capable nor willing; and if, indeed, there chances to be one willing to erect some worthy building, he often takes no manner of care to seek out an architect of real merit or of any loftiness of spirit. Nay, he puts his honour and glory into the keeping of certain thievish creatures, who generally disgrace the name and fame of such memorials; and in order to thrust forward into greatness those who depend entirely upon him (so great is the power of ambition), he often rejects the good designs that are offered to him, and puts into execution the very worst; wherefore his own fame is left besmirched by the clumsiness of the work, since it is considered by all men of judgment that the craftsman and the patron who employs him, in that they are conjoined in their works, are of one and the same mind. And on the other hand, how many Princes of little understanding have there been, who, through having chanced upon persons of excellence and judgment, have obtained after death no less fame from the memory of their buildings than they enjoyed when alive from their sovereignty over their people.

Many talented individuals are wasted who could create extraordinary and valuable works if, upon entering the world, they encountered people who are capable and eager to guide them in the projects for which they are suited. However, it often happens that those with the resources are neither able nor willing to help; and if there happens to be someone willing to build something worthwhile, they often fail to find an architect of true skill or ambition. Instead, they entrust their reputation to certain untrustworthy individuals, who usually tarnish the name and legacy of such creations; and in their desire to elevate those who rely entirely on them (such is the power of ambition), they often dismiss good proposals and pursue the worst options; thus, their own reputation suffers due to the clumsiness of the work, as discerning people believe that the artist and the patron, being linked through their works, share the same vision. Conversely, how many less capable rulers have gained enduring fame after their death from the memory of their buildings, thanks to having encountered talented and wise individuals, compared to the recognition they received during their lives for ruling their people.

Truly fortunate, however, in his day, was Cronaca, in that he not only had the knowledge, but also found those who kept him continually employed, and that always on great and magnificent works. Of him it is related that while Antonio Pollaiuolo was in Rome, working at the tombs of bronze that are in S. Pietro, there came to his house a young [Pg 266] lad, his relative, whose proper name was Simone, and who had fled from Florence on account of some brawl. This Simone, having worked with a master in woodwork, and being much inclined to the art of architecture, began to observe the beautiful antiquities of that city, and, delighting in them, went about measuring them with the greatest diligence. And, going on with this, he had not been long in Rome before he showed that he had made much proficience, both in taking measurements and in carrying one or two things into execution.

Truly, Cronaca was quite lucky in his time, as he not only had the knowledge but also found people who kept him constantly busy with grand and impressive projects. It's said that while Antonio Pollaiuolo was in Rome, working on the bronze tombs at S. Pietro, a young relative named Simone came to his house. Simone had fled Florence due to some fight. Having worked with a master in woodworking and being very interested in architecture, he started to take in the beautiful ancient structures of the city and, enjoying them, began measuring them with great care. Not long after arriving in Rome, he demonstrated a lot of skill, both in taking measurements and in executing a couple of projects.

Thereupon he conceived the idea of returning to Florence, and departed from Rome; and on arriving in his native city, having become a passing good master of words, he described the marvels of Rome and of other places with such accuracy, that from that time onwards he was called Il Cronaca, every man thinking that he was truly a chronicle of information in his discourse. Now he had become such that he was held to be the most excellent of the modern architects in the city of Florence, seeing that he had good judgment in choosing sites, and showed that he had an intellect more lofty than that of many others who were engaged in that profession; for it was evident from his works how good an imitator he was of antiquities, and how closely he had observed the rules of Vitruvius and the works of Filippo di Ser Brunellesco.

Then he came up with the idea of going back to Florence and left Rome. Once he arrived in his hometown, he had become quite skilled with words and described the wonders of Rome and other places so accurately that from that time on, he was known as Il Cronaca, with everyone believing he was truly a source of information in his talks. He had become someone regarded as the best modern architect in Florence, showing good judgment in site selection and demonstrating a higher intellect than many others in that field. It was clear from his works how well he imitated ancient styles and how closely he followed the principles of Vitruvius and the works of Filippo di Ser Brunellesco.

Detail of Cornice.

DETAIL OF CORNICE
(After Simone [Il Cronaca],
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

DETAIL OF CORNICE
(After Simone [Il Cronaca],
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

There was then in Florence that Filippo Strozzi who is now called "the elder," to distinguish him from his son; and he, being very rich, wished to leave to his native city and to his children, among other memorials of himself, one in the form of a beautiful palace. Wherefore Benedetto da Maiano, having been called upon by him for this purpose, made him a model entirely isolated, which was afterwards put into execution, although not in all its extent, as will be related below, for some of his neighbours would not give up their houses to accommodate him. Benedetto began the palace, therefore, in the best way that he could, and brought the outer shell almost to completion before the death of Filippo: which outer shell is in the Rustic Order, with varying degrees of rustication, as may be seen, since the boss-covered part from the first range of windows downwards, together with the doors, is very much Rustic, and the part from the first range of windows to the second is much less Rustic. [Pg 267] Now it happened that at the very moment when Benedetto was leaving Florence, Cronaca returned from Rome; whereupon, Simone being presented to Filippo, the latter was so pleased with the model that he made for the courtyard and for the great cornice which goes round the outer side of the palace, that, having recognized the excellence of his intellect, he decided that thenceforward the whole work should pass through his hands, and availed himself of his services ever afterwards. Cronaca, then, in addition to the beautiful exterior in the Tuscan Order, made at the top a very magnificent Corinthian cornice, which serves to complete the roof; and half of it is seen finished at the present day, with such extraordinary grace that nothing could be added to it, nor could anything more beautiful be desired. This cornice was taken by Cronaca, who copied it in Rome with exact measurements, from an ancient one that is to be found at Spoglia Cristo, which is held to be the most beautiful among the many that are in that city; although it is true that it was enlarged by Cronaca to the proportions required by the palace, to the end that it might make a suitable finish, and might also complete the roof of that palace by means of its projection. Thus, then, the genius of Cronaca was able to make use of the works of others and to transform them almost into his own; which does not succeed with many, since the difficulty lies not in merely having drawings and copies of beautiful things, but in accommodating them to the purpose which they have to serve, with grace, true measurement, proportion, and fitness. But just as much as this cornice of Cronaca's was and always will be extolled, so was that one censured which was made for the Palace of the Bartolini in the same city by Baccio d' Agnolo, who, seeking to imitate Cronaca, placed over a small façade, delicate in detail, a great ancient cornice copied with the exact measurements from the frontispiece of Monte Cavallo; which resulted in such ugliness, from his not having known how to adapt it with judgment, that it could not look worse, for it seems like an enormous cap on a small head. It is not enough for craftsmen, when they have executed their works, to excuse themselves, as many do, by saying that they were taken with exact measurements from the antique and copied from good masters, seeing that good judgment and the eye play a greater [Pg 268] part in all such matters than measuring with compasses. Cronaca, then, executed half of the said cornice with great art right round that palace, together with dentils and ovoli, and finished it completely on two sides, counterpoising the stones in such a way, in order that they might turn out well bound and balanced, that there is no better masonry to be seen, nor any carried to perfection with more diligence. In like manner, all the other stones are so well put together, and with so high a finish, that the whole does not appear to be of masonry, but rather all of one piece. And to the end that everything might be in keeping, he caused beautiful pieces of iron-work to be made for all parts of the palace, as adornments for it, and the lanterns that are at the corners, which were all executed with supreme diligence by Niccolò Grosso, called Il Caparra, a smith of Florence. In those marvellous lanterns may be seen cornices, columns, capitals, and brackets of iron, fixed together with wonderful craftsmanship; nor has any modern ever executed in iron works so large and so difficult, and with such knowledge and mastery.

There was a wealthy man in Florence named Filippo Strozzi, now known as "the elder," to differentiate him from his son. He wanted to leave a lasting legacy for his hometown and his children, which included building a beautiful palace. So, he commissioned Benedetto da Maiano, who created a completely isolated model for the palace. Although the full design was never completed, as some of his neighbors refused to sell their houses, Benedetto began construction in the best way possible and nearly finished the outer structure before Filippo passed away. This exterior features the Rustic Order, with varying levels of roughness; from the first row of windows down to the doors, it is quite Rustic, while the area between the first and second rows of windows is much less so. Just as Benedetto was leaving Florence, Cronaca returned from Rome. When Filippo saw the model for the courtyard and the grand cornice around the palace designed by Simone, he was so impressed that he decided to have Cronaca take over the entire project. From then on, he relied on Cronaca's skills. Cronaca added a magnificent Corinthian cornice at the top to finish the roof, which is still visible today, showcasing such extraordinary elegance that nothing could improve it or be more beautiful. He based this cornice on an ancient example found at Spoglia Cristo in Rome, considered the most beautiful in the city, although he enlarged it to fit the palace's needs, ensuring it served as an appropriate finish and enhanced the roof's projection. Cronaca's talent allowed him to utilize existing works and make them feel original, unlike many who struggle with this. The challenge lies not just in having drawings or copies of beautiful things but in skillfully adapting them to their purpose with grace, correct measurements, proportion, and appropriateness. While Cronaca's cornice is celebrated, the one made for the Bartolini Palace by Baccio d’Agnolo was criticized. Baccio, trying to imitate Cronaca, placed a large ancient cornice, copied exactly from Monte Cavallo, above a delicate small façade; the result was so unattractive that it looked like an oversized hat on a tiny head. Craftsmen cannot excuse their works simply by saying they were measured accurately from antiques and well-respected masters, because good judgment and an artistic eye matter more than precision measurements. Cronaca skillfully completed half of his cornice around the palace, incorporating dentils and ovoli, and he finished two sides with such meticulous craftsmanship that there is no better masonry anywhere, executed with the utmost care. All the stones are fitted together so seamlessly that it appears as if the entire structure is carved from a single piece. To maintain consistency, he commissioned beautiful ironwork for various parts of the palace, including lanterns at the corners, all crafted with exceptional skill by Niccolò Grosso, known as Il Caparra, a blacksmith from Florence. These remarkable lanterns showcase cornices, columns, capitals, and brackets in iron, all expertly crafted; no modern artisan has created large and complex ironwork with such knowledge and mastery.

Iron Link-holder.

IRON LINK-HOLDER
(After Niccolò Grosso.
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

IRON LINK-HOLDER
(After Niccolò Grosso.
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

Niccolò Grosso was an eccentric and self-willed person, claiming justice for himself and giving it to others, and never covetous of what was not his own. He would never give anyone credit in the payment of his works, and always insisted on having his earnest-money. For this reason Lorenzo de' Medici called him Il Caparra,[28] and he was known to many others by that name. He had a sign fixed over his shop, wherein were books burning; wherefore, when one asked for time to make his payment, he would say, "I cannot give it, for my books are burning, and I can enter no more debtors in them." He was commissioned by the honourable Captains of the Guelph party to make a pair of andirons, which, when he had finished them, were sent for several times. But he kept saying, "On this anvil do I sweat and labour, and on it will I have my money paid down." Whereupon they sent to him once more for the work, with a message that he should come for his money, for he would straightway be paid; but he, still obstinate, answered that they must first bring the money. The provveditore, therefore, knowing that the Captains wished to see the work, fell into a rage, and sent to him saying [Pg 269] that he had received half the money, and that when he had dispatched the andirons, he would pay him the rest. On which account Caparra, recognizing that this was true, gave one of the andirons to the messenger, saying: "Take them this one, for it is theirs; and if it pleases them, bring me the rest of the money, and I will hand over the other; but at present it is mine." The officials, seeing the marvellous work that he had put into it, sent the money to his shop; and he sent them the other andiron. It is related, also, that Lorenzo de' Medici resolved to have some pieces of iron-work made, to be sent abroad as presents, in order that the excellence of Caparra might be made known. He went, therefore, to his shop, and happened to find him working at some things for certain poor people, from whom he had received part of the price as earnest-money. On Lorenzo making his request, Niccolò would in no way promise to serve him before having satisfied the others, saying that they had come to his shop before Lorenzo, and that he valued their money as much as his. To the same master some young men of the city brought a design, from which he was to make for them an iron instrument for breaking and forcing open other irons by means of a screw, but he absolutely refused to serve them; nay, he upbraided them, and said: "Nothing will induce me to serve you in such a matter; for these things are nothing but thieves' tools, or instruments for abducting and dishonouring young girls. Such things are not for me, I tell you, nor for you, who seem to me to be honest men." And they, perceiving that Caparra would not do their will, asked him who there was in Florence who might serve them; whereupon, flying into a rage, he drove them away with a torrent of abuse. He would never work for Jews, and was wont, indeed, to say that their money was putrid and stinking. He was a good man and a religious, but whimsical in brain and obstinate: and he would never leave Florence, for all the offers that were made to him, but lived and died in that city. Of him I have thought it right to make this record, because he was truly unique in his craft, and has never had and never will have an equal, as may be seen best from the iron-work and the beautiful lanterns of the Palace of the Strozzi.

Niccolò Grosso was an eccentric and strong-willed individual, advocating for justice for himself while also dispensing it to others, and he never desired what wasn’t his. He wouldn’t give anyone credit for his work and always insisted on receiving his payment upfront. Because of this, Lorenzo de' Medici nicknamed him Il Caparra,[28] and many others knew him by that name. He had a sign over his shop depicting burning books, so when someone asked for more time to pay, he would say, "I can't grant that, as my books are burning, and I can't record any more debtors." He was commissioned by the esteemed Captains of the Guelph party to create a pair of andirons, but even after he finished them, they were requested several times. He kept insisting, "I’m sweating and working hard at this anvil, and I won’t release the item until I have my payment." Eventually, they sent a message asking him to come get his money, assuring him he would be paid immediately; however, he stubbornly replied that they needed to bring the money first. The provveditore, knowing the Captains wanted to see the work, got angry and told him that he had already received half the payment, and that he would pay him the rest once the andirons were sent. Realizing the truth in this, Caparra gave one of the andirons to the messenger, saying: "Give them this one; it's theirs. If they like it, bring me the rest of the payment, and I’ll give you the other one; but for now, it belongs to me." The officials, impressed by the incredible craftsmanship, sent the money to his shop, and he sent them the other andiron. It’s also noted that Lorenzo de' Medici wanted to have some ironwork made as gifts to promote Caparra's excellence. So, he went to his shop and found him working on projects for some poor people, from whom he had already received part of the payment as earnest money. When Lorenzo made his request, Niccolò refused to serve him until he had fulfilled the orders for the others, stating that they had come to him first and that he valued their money as much as Lorenzo's. Some young men from the city brought him a design for an iron tool to break and force open other irons using a screw, but he categorically refused, scolding them instead: "I won’t help you with this; these things are just tools for thieves or devices for kidnapping and dishonoring young women. Such items aren’t for me, nor should they be for you, who seem like honest men." Seeing that Caparra wouldn’t bend to their wishes, they asked him who in Florence could assist them, prompting him to angrily drive them away with a barrage of insults. He would never work for Jews and would often say that their money was filthy and repulsive. He was a good and religious man, though quirky and stubborn. He never left Florence, despite all the offers he received, and lived and died in that city. I felt it necessary to document this because he was truly one of a kind in his craft, having no equal now or ever, as best showcased by the ironwork and beautiful lanterns at the Palace of the Strozzi.

Iron Lantern.

IRON LANTERN
(After Niccolò Grosso.
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

IRON LANTERN
(After Niccolò Grosso.
Florence: Palazzo Strozzi)
Alinari
View larger image

This palace was brought to completion by Cronaca, and adorned [Pg 270] with a very rich courtyard in the Corinthian and Doric Orders, with ornaments in the form of columns, capitals, cornices, windows, and doors, all most beautiful. And if it should appear to anyone that the interior of this palace is not in keeping with the exterior, he must know that the fault is not Cronaca's, for the reason that he was forced to adapt his interior to an outer shell begun by others, and to follow in great measure what had been laid down by those before him; and it was no small feat for him to have given it such beauty as it displays. The same answer may be made to any who say that the ascent of the stairs is not easy, nor correct in proportion, but too steep and sudden; and likewise, also, to such as say that the rooms and apartments of the interior in general are out of keeping, as has been described, with the grandeur and magnificence of the exterior. Nevertheless this palace will never be held as other than truly magnificent, and equal to any private building whatsoever that has been erected in Italy in our own times; wherefore Cronaca rightly obtained, as he still does, infinite commendation for this work.

This palace was completed by Cronaca, featuring a very lavish courtyard in the Corinthian and Doric styles, embellished with beautiful columns, capitals, cornices, windows, and doors. If anyone thinks that the interior of this palace doesn’t match the exterior, they should know that it's not Cronaca's fault; he had to adapt the interior to an outer shell that was started by someone else and largely follow what had been established before him. It was no small achievement for him to have created such beauty. The same can be said for those who claim that the stairs are difficult to navigate or not properly proportioned, being too steep and sudden; and for those who say that the rooms and spaces inside don’t match the grandeur of the exterior. Still, this palace will always be regarded as truly magnificent, on par with any private building that has been constructed in Italy in recent times. Therefore, Cronaca rightfully earned immense praise for this work, which he continues to receive.

The same master built the Sacristy of S. Spirito in Florence, which is in the form of an octagonal temple, beautiful in proportions, and executed with a high finish; and among other things to be seen in this work are some capitals fashioned by the happy hand of Andrea dal Monte Sansovino, which are wrought with supreme perfection; and such, likewise, is the antechamber of that sacristy, which is held to be very beautiful in invention, although the coffered ceiling, as will be described, is not well distributed over the columns. The same Cronaca also erected the Church of S. Francesco dell' Osservanza on the hill of S. Miniato, without Florence; and likewise the whole of the Convent of the Servite Friars, which is a highly extolled work.

The same master built the Sacristy of S. Spirito in Florence, designed as an octagonal temple with beautiful proportions and a high level of craftsmanship. Among the notable features of this work are some capitals made by the talented Andrea dal Monte Sansovino, crafted with exceptional perfection. The antechamber of that sacristy is also considered very well designed, although the coffered ceiling, as will be described, isn’t well balanced over the columns. The same Cronaca also constructed the Church of S. Francesco dell' Osservanza on the hill of S. Miniato, just outside Florence, as well as the entire Convent of the Servite Friars, which is highly praised.

Interior of Sacristy.

INTERIOR OF SACRISTY
(After Simone [Il Cronaca].
Florence: S. Spirito)
Alinari
View larger image

INTERIOR OF SACRISTY
(After Simone [Il Cronaca].
Florence: S. Spirito)
Alinari
View larger image

At this same time there was about to be built, by the advice of Fra Girolamo Savonarola, a most famous preacher of that day, the Great Council Chamber of the Palace of the Signoria in Florence; and for this opinions were taken from Leonardo da Vinci, Michelagnolo Buonarroti, although he was a mere lad, Giuliano da San Gallo, Baccio d' Agnolo, and Simone del Pollaiuolo, called Il Cronaca, who was the devoted friend and follower of Savonarola. These men, after many disputes, came to [Pg 271] an agreement, and decided that the Hall should be made in that form which it retained down to our own times, when, as has been mentioned and will be related yet again in another place, it was almost rebuilt. The charge of the whole work was given to Cronaca, as a man of talent and also as the friend of the aforesaid Fra Girolamo; and he executed it with great promptitude and diligence, showing the beauty of his genius particularly in the making of the roof, since the structure is of vast extent in every direction. He made the tie-beams of the roof-truss, which are thirty-eight braccia in length from wall to wall, of a number of timbers well scarfed and fastened together, since it was not possible to find beams of sufficient size for the purpose; and whereas the tie-beams of other roof-trusses have only one king-post, all those of this Hall have three each, a king-post in the middle, and a queen-post on either side. The rafters are long in proportion, and so are the struts of each king-post and queen-post; nor must I omit to say that the struts of the queen-posts, on the side nearest the wall, thrust against the rafters, and, towards the centre, against the struts of the king-post. I have thought it right to describe how this roof-truss is made, because it was constructed with beautiful design, and I have seen drawings made of it by many for sending to various places. When these tie-beams, thus contrived, had been drawn up and placed at intervals of six braccia, and the roof had been likewise laid down in a very short space of time, Cronaca attended to the fixing of the ceiling, which was then made of plain wood and divided into panels, each of which was four braccia square and surrounded by an ornamental cornice of few members; and a flat moulding was made of the same width as the planks, which enclosed the panels and the whole work, with large bosses at the intersections and the corners of the whole ceiling. And although the end walls of this Hall, one on either side, were eight braccia out of the square, they did not make up their minds, as they might have done, to thicken the walls so as to make it square, but carried them up to the roof just as they were, making three large windows on each of those end walls. But when the whole was finished, the Hall, on account of its extraordinary size, turned out to be too dark, and also stunted and wanting in height in relation to its great [Pg 272] length and breadth; in short, almost wholly out of proportion. They sought, therefore, but with little success, to improve it by making two windows in the middle of the eastern side of the Hall, and four on the western side. After this, in order to give it its final completion, they made on the level of the brick floor, with great rapidity, being much pressed by the citizens, a wooden tribune right round the walls of the Hall, three braccia both in breadth and height, with seats after the manner of a theatre, and with a balustrade in front; on which tribune all the magistrates of the city were to sit. In the middle of the eastern side was a more elevated daïs, on which the Signori sat with the Gonfalonier of Justice; and on either side of this more prominent place was a door, one of them leading to the Segreto[29] and the other to the Specchio.[30] Opposite to this, on the west side, was an altar at which Mass was read, with a panel by the hand of Fra Bartolommeo, as has been mentioned; and beside the altar was the pulpit for making speeches. In the middle of the Hall, then, were benches in rows laid crossways, for the citizens; while in the centre and at the corners of the tribune were some gangways with six steps, providing a convenient ascent for the ushers in the collection of votes. In this Hall, which was much extolled at that day for its many beautiful features and the rapidity with which it was erected, time has since served to reveal such errors as that it is low, dark, gloomy, and out of the square. Nevertheless Cronaca and the others deserve to be excused, both on account of the haste with which it was executed at the desire of the citizens, who intended in time to have it adorned with pictures and the ceiling overlaid with gold, and because up to that day there had been no greater hall built in Italy; although there are others very large, such as that of the Palace of S. Marco in Rome, that of the Vatican, erected by Pius II and Innocent VIII, that of the Castle of Naples, that of the Palace of Milan, and those of Urbino, Venice, and Padua.

At this same time, with the guidance of Fra Girolamo Savonarola, a well-known preacher of that era, the Great Council Chamber of the Palace of the Signoria in Florence was about to be constructed. Opinions were sought from Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo Buonarroti, who was just a young man at the time, Giuliano da San Gallo, Baccio d'Agniolo, and Simone del Pollaiuolo, known as Il Cronaca, who was a loyal friend and follower of Savonarola. After much debate, these individuals reached an agreement on the design, which has remained until today. As mentioned before and will be detailed further elsewhere, the Hall was nearly rebuilt. The responsibility for the entire project was given to Cronaca due to his talent and his friendship with Fra Girolamo, and he completed it with great speed and care. He particularly showcased his skill in constructing the roof, which covers an extensive area. He created the tie-beams for the roof-truss, measuring thirty-eight braccia in length from wall to wall, by joining several smaller timbers together, as it was not possible to find larger beams for the purpose. While the tie-beams of other roof-trusses typically have just one king-post, every tie-beam in this Hall has three: one king-post in the center and a queen-post on either side. The rafters and the struts of both the king-posts and queen-posts are proportionately long; furthermore, I should mention that the struts of the queen-posts, on the wall side, push against the rafters, while they also press against the struts of the king-post towards the center. I thought it important to describe how this roof-truss is constructed because it was designed beautifully, and I have seen many drawings of it made for various purposes. After the tie-beams were positioned at intervals of six braccia and the roof itself was completed quickly, Cronaca focused on the ceiling, which was made of simple wood divided into panels, each four braccia square, framed by a modest ornamental cornice. A flat molding, matching the width of the planks, lined the panels and the entire ceiling, with large bosses at the intersections and corners. Although the end walls of this Hall were eight braccia off-square, they opted not to thicken the walls to make it square, instead raising them to the roof as they were, adding three large windows on each end wall. However, once everything was finished, the Hall's remarkable size made it too dark, appearing low and lacking height compared to its significant length and width; in short, it seemed almost entirely out of proportion. They attempted to enhance it, albeit unsuccessfully, by adding two windows in the center of the eastern side and four on the western side. Subsequently, to finalize the space, they quickly built a wooden tribune around the room on the level of the brick floor, three braccia in both width and height, with theater-style seating and a balustrade in front for the city magistrates. At the middle of the eastern side was a raised daïs for the Signori, alongside the Gonfalonier of Justice; on either side of this prominent spot was a door, one leading to the Segreto[29] and the other to the Specchio.[30] Across from this, on the west side, was an altar where Mass was held, featuring a panel by Fra Bartolommeo, as mentioned before; next to the altar was the pulpit for speeches. In the middle of the Hall, there were rows of benches set crosswise for the citizens, while the center and corners of the tribune included aisles with six steps, providing easy access for ushers to collect votes. This Hall was highly praised at the time for its many beautiful features and the speed of its construction, yet over time, its shortcomings have become evident, revealing that it is low, dark, gloomy, and not quite square. Nevertheless, Cronaca and the others deserve some leniency because of the urgency imposed by the citizens, who planned to eventually beautify it with artwork and gilded ceilings, and because, until that point, there had been no larger hall built in Italy; although there are other very large halls, like those in the Palace of S. Marco in Rome, the Vatican built by Pius II and Innocent VIII, the Castle of Naples, the Palace of Milan, and those in Urbino, Venice, and Padua.

After this, to provide an ascent to this Hall, Cronaca, with the advice [Pg 273] of the same masters, made a great staircase six braccia wide and curving in two flights, richly adorned with grey-stone, and with Corinthian pilasters and capitals, double cornices, and arches, of the same stone; and with barrel-shaped vaulting, and windows with columns of variegated marble and carved marble capitals. But although this work was much extolled, it would have won even greater praise if the staircase had not turned out inconvenient and too steep; for it is a sure fact that it could have been made more gentle, as has been done in the time of Duke Cosimo, within the same amount of space and no more, in the new staircase made, opposite to that of Cronaca, by Giorgio Vasari, which is so gentle in ascent and so convenient, that going up it is almost like walking on the level. This has been the work of the aforesaid Lord Duke Cosimo, who, being a man of most happy genius and most profound judgment both in the government of his people and in all other things, grudges neither expense nor anything else in his desire to make all the fortifications and other buildings, both public and private, correspond to the greatness of his own mind, and not less beautiful than useful or less useful than beautiful.

After this, to provide access to this Hall, Cronaca, with the advice [Pg 273] of the same masters, created a large staircase six braccia wide that curves in two flights. It was richly decorated with grey stone and featured Corinthian pilasters and capitals, double cornices, and arches made from the same stone, along with barrel-shaped vaulting and windows embellished with columns of variegated marble and carved marble capitals. However, even though this work received much acclaim, it would have earned even greater praise if the staircase hadn't turned out to be inconvenient and too steep. It’s a well-known fact that it could have been designed to have a gentler slope, similar to what was done during the time of Duke Cosimo, within the same space, in the new staircase built opposite Cronaca's by Giorgio Vasari. That staircase is so gentle in ascent and convenient that going up it feels almost like walking on flat ground. This has been the work of the aforementioned Lord Duke Cosimo, who, being a man of remarkable genius and deep judgment in governing his people and many other matters, spares no expense or effort in his desire to ensure that all fortifications and other structures, both public and private, reflect the greatness of his vision, and are equally beautiful and functional.

His Excellency, then, reflecting that the body of this Hall is the largest, the most magnificent, and the most beautiful in all Europe, has resolved to have it improved in such parts as are defective, and to have it made in every other part more ornate than any other structure in Italy, by the design and hand of Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo. And thus, the walls having been raised twelve braccia above their former height, in such a manner that the height from the pavement to the ceiling is thirty-two braccia, the roof-truss made by Cronaca to support the roof has been restored and replaced on high after a new arrangement; and the old ceiling, which was simple and commonplace, and by no means worthy of that Hall, has been remodelled with a system of compartments of great variety, rich in mouldings, full of carvings, and all overlaid with gold, together with thirty-nine painted panels, square, round, and octagonal, the greater number of which are each nine braccia in extent, and some even more, and all containing scenes painted in oils, with the largest figures seven or eight braccia high. In these stories, commencing with the very beginning, may be seen the rise, the honours, the victories, [Pg 274] and the glorious deeds of the city and state of Florence, and in particular the wars of Pisa and Siena, together with an endless number of other things, which it would take too long to describe. And on each of the side walls there has been left a convenient space of sixty braccia, in each of which are to be painted three scenes in keeping with the ceiling and embracing the space of seven pictures on either side, which represent events from the wars of Pisa and Siena. These compartments on the walls are so large, that no greater spaces for the painting of historical pictures have ever been seen either by the ancients or by the moderns. And the said compartments are adorned by some vast stone ornaments which meet at the ends of the Hall, at one side of which, namely, the northern side, the Lord Duke has caused to be finished a work begun and carried nearly to completion by Baccio Bandinelli, that is, a façade filled with columns and pilasters and with niches containing statues of marble; which space is to serve as a public audience chamber, as will be related in the proper place. On the other side, opposite to this, there is to be, in a similar façade that is being made by the sculptor and architect Ammanati, a fountain to throw up water in the Hall, with a rich and most beautiful adornment of columns and statues of marble and bronze. Nor will I forbear to say that this Hall, in consequence of the roof having been raised twelve braccia, has gained not only height, but also an ample supply of windows, since, in addition to the others that are higher up, in each of those end walls are to be made three large windows, which will be over the level of a corridor that is to form a loggia within the Hall and to extend on one side over the work of Bandinelli, whence there will be revealed a most beautiful view of the whole Piazza. But of this Hall, and of the other improvements that have been or are being made in the Palace, there will be a longer account in another place. This only let me say at present, that if Cronaca and those other ingenious craftsmen who gave the design for the Hall could return to life, in my belief they would not recognize either the Palace, or the Hall, or any other thing that is there. The Hall, namely, that part which is rectangular, without counting the works of Bandinelli and Ammanati, is ninety braccia in length and thirty-eight braccia in breadth.

His Excellency, reflecting on the fact that the main area of this Hall is the largest, most impressive, and most beautiful in all of Europe, has decided to improve the parts that are lacking and to make it more ornate than any other structure in Italy, designed and executed by Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo. Thus, the walls have been raised twelve braccia higher than before, so that the height from the floor to the ceiling is thirty-two braccia. The roof truss made by Cronaca to support the roof has been restored and repositioned after a new arrangement, and the old ceiling, which was plain and unremarkable, has been redesigned with a variety of compartments, richly moulded, finely carved, and embellished with gold, along with thirty-nine painted panels that are square, round, and octagonal, most of which are each nine braccia wide, with some even larger, all featuring scenes painted in oils, with the largest figures standing seven or eight braccia tall. In these stories, starting from the very beginning, one can see the rise, honors, victories, [Pg 274] and glorious deeds of the city and state of Florence, particularly the wars of Pisa and Siena, along with countless other elements that would take too long to describe. Each side wall has been left with a space of sixty braccia, where three scenes will be painted that align with the ceiling, creating a total of seven pictures on either side that depict events from the wars of Pisa and Siena. These wall compartments are so large that no bigger spaces for historical paintings have ever been seen by either the ancients or the moderns. Additionally, these compartments are decorated with massive stone ornaments that meet at the ends of the Hall. On one side, specifically the northern side, the Lord Duke has completed a project that Baccio Bandinelli began and nearly finished, which is a façade filled with columns and pilasters, featuring niches with marble statues; this area will serve as a public audience chamber, as will be explained in due course. On the opposite side, there will be a similar façade created by the sculptor and architect Ammanati, which will include a fountain that sprays water into the Hall, along with a rich and beautiful decoration of columns and statues made of marble and bronze. I must also mention that this Hall, due to the roof being raised twelve braccia, has gained not only height but also an abundance of windows. In addition to the existing higher windows, there will be three large windows on each of the end walls, situated above a loggia that will run along one side above Bandinelli’s work, providing a stunning view of the entire Piazza. However, a more detailed account of this Hall and the other improvements made or underway in the Palace will be given elsewhere. For now, I will just say that if Cronaca and those other skilled craftsmen who designed the Hall could come back to life, I believe they would not recognize the Palace, the Hall, or anything else there. The Hall, specifically the rectangular section, not including the works of Bandinelli and Ammanati, measures ninety braccia in length and thirty-eight braccia in width.

[Pg 275] But returning to Cronaca: in the last years of his life there entered into his head such a frenzy for the cause of Fra Girolamo Savonarola, that he would talk of nothing else but that. Living thus, in the end he died after a passing long illness, at the age of fifty-five, and was buried honourably in the Church of S. Ambrogio at Florence, in the year 1509; and after no long space of time the following epitaph was written for him by Messer Giovan Battista Strozzi:

[Pg 275] But back to Cronaca: in the final years of his life, he became so obsessed with the cause of Fra Girolamo Savonarola that he talked about nothing else. Living like this, he eventually died after a lengthy illness at the age of fifty-five and was buried honorably in the Church of S. Ambrogio in Florence in 1509. Not long after, the following epitaph was written for him by Messer Giovan Battista Strozzi:

CRONACA
VIVO, E MILLE E MILLE ANNI E MILLE ANCORA,
MERCÈ DE' VIVI MIEI PALAZZI E TEMPI,
BELLA ROMA, VIVRÀ L' ALMA MIA FLORA.

CRONACA
I LIVE, AND THOUSAND AND THOUSAND YEARS AND THOUSAND MORE,
THANKS TO THE LIVING MY PALACES AND TIMES,
BEAUTIFUL ROME, MY SOUL WILL LIVE.

Cronaca had a brother called Matteo, who gave himself to sculpture and worked under the sculptor Antonio Rossellino; but although he was a man of good and beautiful intelligence, a fine draughtsman, and well practised in working marble, he left no finished work, because, being snatched from the world by death at the age of nineteen, he was not able to accomplish that which was expected from him by all who knew him.

Cronaca had a brother named Matteo, who dedicated himself to sculpture and worked under the sculptor Antonio Rossellino. Although he was a smart and talented artist, a great draftsman, and skilled in working with marble, he didn’t leave behind any completed pieces. Sadly, he was taken from the world by death at the age of nineteen and wasn't able to fulfill the potential that everyone who knew him expected of him.


[Pg 277] DOMENICO PULIGO


[Pg 279] LIFE OF DOMENICO PULIGO

PAINTER OF FLORENCE

It is a marvellous and almost incredible thing, that many followers of the art of painting, through continual practice and handling of colours, either by an instinct of nature or by the trick of a good manner, acquired without any draughtsmanship or grounding, carry their works to such thorough completion, and very often contrive to make them so good, that, although the craftsmen themselves may be none of the rarest, their pictures force the world to extol them and to hold them in supreme veneration. And it has been perceived in the past from many examples, and in many of our painters, that the most vivacious and perfect works are produced by those who have a beautiful manner from nature, although they must exercise it with continual study and labour; while this gift of nature has such power, that even if they neglect or abandon the studies of art, and pay attention to nothing save the mere practice of painting and of handling colours with a grace infused in them by nature, at the first glance their works have the appearance of displaying all the excellent and marvellous qualities that are wont to appear after a close inspection in the works of those masters whom we hold to be the best. And that this is true, is demonstrated to us in our own day by experience, from the works of Domenico Puligo, a painter of Florence; wherein what has been said above may be clearly recognized by one who has knowledge of the matters of art.

It's amazing and almost unbelievable that many painters, through constant practice and working with colors, either by natural instinct or through skillful technique, manage to create their works so thoroughly that, even if they aren't the most talented craftsmen, their paintings compel the world to praise them and hold them in high regard. History has shown, through many examples and numerous painters, that the most lively and complete works come from those who have a natural flair, although they must hone it with ongoing study and effort. This natural talent is so powerful that even if they neglect or completely stop studying art and focus solely on painting and handling colors with an inherent grace, their works immediately exhibit all the impressive and amazing qualities that typically reveal themselves only upon closer inspection in the pieces by the masters we consider the best. This point is clearly illustrated in our time by the works of Domenico Puligo, a painter from Florence; anyone knowledgeable in art can clearly see the truth of this.

Madonna and Child, with Saints.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Domenico Puligo (?).
Florence: S. Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi)
Alinari
View larger image

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Domenico Puligo (?).
Florence: S. Maria Maddalena de' Pazzi)
Alinari
View larger image

While Ridolfo, the son of Domenico Ghirlandajo, was executing a number of works in painting at Florence, as will be related, he followed his father's habit of always keeping many young men painting in his [Pg 280] workshop: which was the reason that not a few of them, through competing one with another, became very good masters, some at making portraits from life, some at working in fresco, others in distemper, and others at painting readily on cloth. Making these lads execute pictures, panels, and canvases, in the course of a few years Ridolfo, with great profit for himself, sent an endless number of these to England, to Germany, and to Spain. Baccio Gotti and Toto del Nunziata, disciples of Ridolfo, were summoned, one to France by King Francis, and the other to England by the King of that country, each of whom invited them after having seen some of their work. Two other disciples of the same master remained with him, working under him for many years, because, although they had many invitations into Spain and Hungary from merchants and others, they were never induced either by promises or by money to tear themselves away from the delights of their country, in which they had more work to do than they were able to execute. One of these two was Antonio del Ceraiuolo, a Florentine, who, having been many years with Lorenzo di Credi, had learnt from him, above all, to draw so well from nature, that with supreme facility he gave his portraits an extraordinary likeness to the life, although otherwise he was no great draughtsman. And I have seen some heads portrayed from life by his hand, which, although they have, for example, the nose crooked, one lip small and the other large, and other suchlike deformities, nevertheless resemble the life, through his having well caught the expression of the subject; whereas, on the other hand, many excellent masters have made pictures and portraits of absolute perfection with regard to art, but with no resemblance whatever to those that they are supposed to represent. And to tell the truth, he who executes portraits must contrive, without thinking of what is looked for in a perfect figure, to make them like those for whom they are intended. When portraits are like and also beautiful, then may they be called rare works, and their authors truly excellent craftsmen. This Antonio, then, besides many portraits, executed a number of panel-pictures in Florence; but for the sake of brevity I will make mention only of two. One of these, wherein he painted a Crucifixion, with S. Mary Magdalene and S. Francis, is in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, on the Canto degli [Pg 281] Alberti; and in the other, which is in the Nunziata, is a S. Michael who is weighing souls.

While Ridolfo, the son of Domenico Ghirlandajo, was working on several painting projects in Florence, as will be discussed, he continued his father's practice of always having many young men painting in his [Pg 280] workshop. This led to several of them becoming skilled masters due to their competition with one another—some specialized in lifelike portraits, some excelled in fresco, others in distemper, and some became adept at painting on cloth. Ridolfo had these young artists create numerous pictures, panels, and canvases, which he sent in great quantities to England, Germany, and Spain, profiting greatly from this. Baccio Gotti and Toto del Nunziata, both students of Ridolfo, were invited to France by King Francis and to England by the King of that country, respectively, after he had seen some of their work. Two other students of the same master stayed with him for many years, even though they received numerous invitations to Spain and Hungary from merchants and others. They were never persuaded to leave the comforts of their homeland, where they had more work than they could handle. One of these two was Antonio del Ceraiuolo, a Florentine, who, after spending many years with Lorenzo di Credi, learned to draw incredibly well from nature. This skill allowed him to give his portraits a remarkable likeness, although he wasn't an exceptional draughtsman otherwise. I've seen some heads he painted from life which, despite flaws like a crooked nose, one small lip, and one large lip, still captured the essence of the subjects well. In contrast, many skilled artists have created portraits with perfect technique that bore no resemblance to the actual people they depicted. Honestly, someone creating portraits needs to focus on making them resemble the individuals intended rather than on achieving perfection in figure drawing. When portraits are both true to life and beautiful, they can be considered rare works, and their creators truly excellent craftsmen. Antonio, in addition to many portraits, created several panel-pictures in Florence, but for brevity, I'll mention only two. One is a Crucifixion featuring St. Mary Magdalene and St. Francis located in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, on the Canto degli [Pg 281] Alberti; the other, in the Nunziata, depicts St. Michael weighing souls.

The other of the two aforesaid disciples was Domenico Puligo, who was more excellent in draughtsmanship and more pleasing and gracious in colouring than any of the others mentioned above. He, considering that his method of painting with softness, without overloading his works with colour or making them hard, but causing the distances to recede little by little as though veiled with a kind of mist, gave his pictures both relief and grace, and that although the outlines of the figures that he made were lost in such a way that his errors were concealed and hidden from view in the dark grounds into which the figures merged, nevertheless his colouring and the beautiful expressions of his heads made his works pleasing, always kept to the same method of working and to the same manner, which caused him to be held in esteem as long as he lived. But omitting to give an account of the pictures and portraits that he made while in the workshop of Ridolfo, some of which were sent abroad and some remained in the city, I shall speak only of those which he painted when he was rather the friend and rival of Ridolfo than his disciple, and of those that he executed when he was so much the friend of Andrea del Sarto, that nothing was more dear to him than to see that master in his workshop, in order to learn from him, showing him his works and asking his opinion of them, so as to avoid such errors and defects as those men often fall into who do not show their work to any other craftsman, but trust so much in their own judgment that they would rather incur the censure of all the world when those works are finished, than correct them by means of the suggestions of loving friends.

The other of the two mentioned disciples was Domenico Puligo, who was better at drawing and more pleasing and graceful in coloring than any of the others noted. He painted with a soft style, avoiding heavy use of color or making his works look harsh, instead allowing the backgrounds to fade in a way that suggested a kind of mist, giving his paintings both depth and elegance. Although the outlines of the figures he created were somewhat obscured, hiding any mistakes in the darker backgrounds where the figures blended in, his coloring and the beautiful expressions of the faces he painted made his works appealing. He consistently stuck to his working method and style, which earned him respect throughout his life. However, rather than detailing the pictures and portraits he created while working in Ridolfo's workshop, some of which were sent abroad and some stayed in the city, I will focus only on the pieces he painted when he was more of a friend and rival to Ridolfo than a disciple. I will also discuss those works he did when he was so close with Andrea del Sarto that nothing mattered more to him than having that master in his workshop to learn from him, showing him his works and seeking his feedback to avoid the common mistakes of artists who don’t share their work with others and are too confident in their own judgment, preferring to face the criticism of the world rather than accept constructive criticism from supportive friends.

One of the first things that Domenico executed was a very beautiful picture of Our Lady for Messer Agnolo della Stufa, who has it in his Abbey of Capalona in the district of Arezzo, and holds it very dear for the great diligence of its execution and the beauty of its colouring. He painted another picture of Our Lady, no less beautiful than that one, for Messer Agnolo Niccolini, now Archbishop of Pisa and a Cardinal, who keeps it in his house on the Canto de' Pazzi in Florence; and likewise another, of equal size and excellence, which is now in the possession of [Pg 282] Filippo dell' Antella, at Florence. In another, which is about three braccia in height, Domenico made a full-length Madonna with the Child between her knees, a little S. John, and another head; and this picture, which is held to be one of the best works that he executed, since there is no sweeter colouring to be seen, is at the present day in the possession of Messer Filippo Spini, Treasurer to the most Illustrious Prince of Florence, and a gentleman of magnificent spirit, who takes much delight in works of painting.

One of the first things Domenico did was a stunning painting of Our Lady for Messer Agnolo della Stufa, who keeps it in his Abbey of Capalona in the Arezzo region and treasures it for the great care in its execution and its beautiful coloring. He created another equally beautiful painting of Our Lady for Messer Agnolo Niccolini, now the Archbishop of Pisa and a Cardinal, who has it in his home on Canto de' Pazzi in Florence. He also made another painting of similar size and quality, which is currently owned by [Pg 282] Filippo dell'Antella in Florence. In another piece, about three braccia tall, Domenico painted a full-length Madonna with the Child on her lap, a little St. John, and another head. This work is considered one of his best because it features the sweetest coloring, and today it belongs to Messer Filippo Spini, Treasurer to the most Illustrious Prince of Florence, a gentleman with a magnificent spirit who greatly appreciates art.

Among other portraits that Domenico made from the life, which are all beautiful and also good likenesses, the most beautiful is the one which he painted of Monsignore Messer Piero Carnesecchi, at that time a marvellously handsome youth, for whom he also made some other pictures, all very beautiful and executed with much diligence. In like manner, he portrayed in a picture the Florentine Barbara, a famous and most lovely courtesan of that day, much beloved by many no less for her fine culture than for her beauty, and particularly because she was an excellent musician and sang divinely. But the best work that Domenico ever executed was a large picture wherein he made a life-size Madonna, with some angels and little boys, and a S. Bernard who is writing; which picture is now in the hands of Giovanni Gualberto del Giocondo, and of his brother Messer Niccolò, a Canon of S. Lorenzo in Florence.

Among other portraits that Domenico created from life, all of which are beautiful and good likenesses, the most stunning is the one he painted of Monsignore Messer Piero Carnesecchi, who was at that time an incredibly handsome young man. He also created several other pictures of him, all very beautiful and done with great care. Similarly, he captured the Florentine Barbara, a famous and lovely courtesan of that era, who was loved by many for her intelligence as much as for her beauty, especially because she was an excellent musician and sang beautifully. However, the best work Domenico ever produced is a large painting of a life-size Madonna, with some angels and little boys, and St. Bernard, who is writing. This painting is now in the possession of Giovanni Gualberto del Giocondo and his brother Messer Niccolò, a Canon of St. Lorenzo in Florence.

The same master made many other pictures, which are dispersed among the houses of citizens, and in particular some wherein may be seen a half-length figure of Cleopatra, causing an asp to bite her on the breast, and others wherein is the Roman Lucretia killing herself with a dagger. There are also some very beautiful portraits from life and pictures by the same hand at the Porta a Pinti, in the house of Giulio Scali, a man whose judgment is as fine in the matters of our arts as it is in those of every other most noble and most honourable profession. Domenico executed for Francesco del Giocondo, in a panel for his chapel in the great tribune of the Church of the Servi at Florence, a S. Francis who is receiving the Stigmata; which work is very sweet and soft in colouring, and wrought with much diligence. In the Church of Cestello, round the Tabernacle of the Sacrament, he painted two angels in fresco, and on the panel of a [Pg 283] chapel in the same church he made a Madonna with her Son in her arms, S. John the Baptist, S. Bernard, and other saints. And since it appeared to the monks of that place that he had acquitted himself very well in those works, they caused him to paint in a cloister of their Abbey of Settimo, without Florence, the Visions of Count Ugo, who built seven abbeys. And no long time after, Puligo painted, in a shrine at the corner of the Via Mozza da S. Catarina, a Madonna standing, with her Son in her arms marrying S. Catherine, and a figure of S. Peter Martyr. For a Company in the township of Anghiari he executed a Deposition from the Cross, which may be numbered among his best works.

The same master created many other paintings, which are scattered among the homes of citizens. In particular, there are some featuring a half-length image of Cleopatra, allowing an asp to bite her on the breast, and others depicting the Roman Lucretia taking her own life with a dagger. There are also some beautiful life portraits and paintings by the same artist at the Porta a Pinti, in the house of Giulio Scali, a man whose taste in the arts is as refined as it is in any other noble and honorable profession. Domenico completed a panel for Francesco del Giocondo's chapel in the great tribune of the Church of the Servi in Florence, showing St. Francis receiving the Stigmata; this work is very soft and sweet in color and crafted with great care. In the Church of Cestello, around the Tabernacle of the Sacrament, he painted two angels in fresco, and on the panel of a [Pg 283] chapel in the same church, he created a Madonna with her Son in her arms, along with St. John the Baptist, St. Bernard, and other saints. Since the monks there felt he had done an excellent job on those works, they asked him to paint the Visions of Count Ugo, who founded seven abbeys, in a cloister of their Abbey of Settimo, just outside Florence. Shortly afterward, Puligo painted a shrine at the corner of Via Mozza da S. Catarina, featuring a standing Madonna with her Son in her arms, marrying St. Catherine, along with an image of St. Peter Martyr. For a group in the township of Anghiari, he completed a Deposition from the Cross, which is considered one of his best works.

But since it was his profession to attend rather to pictures of Our Lady, portraits, and other heads, than to great works, he gave up almost all his time to such things. Now if he had devoted himself not so much to the pleasures of the world, as he did, and more to the labours of art, there is no doubt that he would have made great proficience in painting, and especially as Andrea del Sarto, who was much his friend, assisted him on many occasions both with advice and with drawings; for which reason many of his works reveal a draughtsmanship as fine as the good and beautiful manner of the colouring. But the circumstance that Domenico was unwilling to endure much fatigue, and accustomed to labour rather in order to get through work and make money than for the sake of fame, prevented him from reaching a greater height. And thus, associating with gay spirits and lovers of good cheer, and with musicians and women, he died at the age of fifty-two, in the year 1527, in the pursuit of a love-affair, having caught the plague at the house of his mistress.

But since his job was more about focusing on images of Our Lady, portraits, and other subjects rather than on major works, he spent almost all his time on those things. If he had dedicated himself less to worldly pleasures and more to the hard work of art, there’s no doubt he would have excelled in painting, especially since his good friend Andrea del Sarto helped him many times with advice and sketches. Because of this, many of his works show excellent drawing skills along with a beautiful approach to color. However, Domenico's reluctance to endure much strain and his tendency to work mainly to earn money rather than for fame kept him from achieving greater heights. So, while socializing with lively friends, music lovers, and women, he died at the age of fifty-two in 1527, caught up in a love affair, having contracted the plague at his mistress's house.

Colour was handled by him in so good and harmonious a manner, that it is for that reason, rather than for any other, that he deserves praise. Among his disciples was Domenico Beceri of Florence, who, giving a high finish to his colouring, executed his works in an excellent manner.

Colour was managed by him in such a good and harmonious way that it's for that reason, rather than any other, that he deserves praise. Among his students was Domenico Beceri of Florence, who, by giving a polished finish to his colouring, created his works exceptionally well.


[Pg 285] INDEX


[Pg 287] INDEX OF NAMES OF THE CRAFTSMEN MENTIONED IN VOLUME IV

  • Abbot of S. Clemente (Don Bartolommeo della Gatta), 41, 82, 216, 217
  • Agnolo, Baccio d', 101, 204, 267, 270
  • Agnolo Gaddi, 52, 54
  • Agostino Busto, 60
  • Albertinelli, Biagio di Bindo, 165
  • Albertinelli, Mariotto, Life, 165-171. 151, 154
  • Albrecht Dürer, 232
  • Aldigieri (Altichiero) da Zevio, 51, 54, 55
  • Alessandro Filipepi (Sandro Botticelli, or Sandro di Botticello), 3, 4, 82
  • Alessandro Moretto, 60
  • Alesso Baldovinetti, 82
  • Alonzo Berughetta, 8
  • Alunno, Niccolò, 18, 19
  • Ammanati, 274
  • Andrea Contucci (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Andrea dal Castagno (Andrea degl' Impiccati), 82
  • Andrea dal Monte Sansovino (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea Contucci), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Andrea degl' Impiccati (Andrea dal Castagno), 82
  • Andrea del Gobbo, 122
  • Andrea del Sarto, 83, 129, 134, 281, 283
  • Andrea di Cosimo, 129
  • Andrea Luigi (L'Ingegno), 47
  • Andrea Mantegna, 24, 55, 82
  • Andrea Sansovino (Andrea Contucci, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Andrea Verrocchio, 35, 39, 81, 90, 92, 112
  • Angelico, Fra (Fra Giovanni da Fiesole), 73, 154, 185
  • Angelo, Battista d', 61
  • Antonio (Antoniasso), 6, 7
  • Antonio da Correggio, Life, 117-122. 83, 125
  • Antonio da San Gallo, Life, 191-205. 145, 254
  • Antonio del Ceraiuolo, 280
  • Antonio di Giorgio, 36
  • Antonio Filarete, 56
  • Antonio Montecavallo, 140
  • Antonio Pollaiuolo, 4, 81, 265
  • Antonio Rossellino, 275
  • Apelles, 82, 83, 105
  • Arezzo, Niccolò d', 55
  • Aristotile da San Gallo, 212
  • Avanzi, Jacopo (Jacopo Davanzo), 51, 55
  • Bacchiaccha, Il (Francesco), 46
  • Baccio Bandinelli, 204, 274
  • Baccio d' Agnolo, 101, 204, 267, 270
  • Baccio da Montelupo, 186
  • Baccio della Porta (Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco), Life, 151-162. 82, 151-162, 165-167, 215, 244, 272
  • Baccio Gotti, 280
  • Baccio Ubertino, 46
  • Baldassarre Peruzzi, 145, 146, 200
  • Baldovinetti, Alesso, 82
  • Bandinelli, Baccio, 204, 274
  • Barile, Gian, 238
  • Bartolommeo, Fra (Fra Carnovale da Urbino), 138
  • Bartolommeo Clemente of Reggio, 60
  • Bartolommeo della Gatta, Don (Abbot of S. Clemente), 41, 82, 216, 217
  • Bartolommeo di San Marco, Fra (Baccio della Porta), Life, 151-162. 82, 151-162, 165-167, 215, 244, 272
  • Bartolommeo Montagna, 52, 60
  • Bartolommeo Vivarini, 52, 59
  • Basaiti, Marco (Il Bassiti, or Marco Basarini), 52, 58
  • Bastiani, Lazzaro (Sebastiano Scarpaccia, or Lazzaro Scarpaccia), 52, 57, 58
  • Bastiano da Monte Carlo, 179
  • Battista Borro, 262
  • Battista d' Angelo, 61
  • Baviera, 232, 233
  • Bazzi, Giovanni Antonio (Sodoma), 72, 218
  • Beceri, Domenico, 283
  • Bellini, Gentile, 57, 59, 109
  • Bellini, Giovanni, 57, 58, 82, 109
  • Bellini, Vittore (Belliniano), 52, 59, 60
  • Benedetto Buglioni, 155
  • Benedetto Buonfiglio, 17, 18
  • Benedetto (Giovan Battista) Caporali, 48, 75, 76
  • Benedetto Cianfanini, 162
  • Benedetto da Maiano, 36, 151, 266, 267
  • Benedetto da Rovezzano, 155
  • Benedetto Diana, 52, 60
  • Benedetto Spadari, 262
  • Bernardino da Trevio, 138
  • Bernardino Pinturicchio, Life, 13-19. 46, 65, 211, 212
  • Bertoldo, 185
  • Berughetta, Alonzo, 8
  • Biagio di Bindo Albertinelli, 165
  • Bianco, Simon, 60
  • Bologna, Il, 237
  • Bolognese, Marc' Antonio, 232, 233
  • Boltraffio, Giovanni Antonio, 105
  • Bonsignori, Francesco, 60
  • Borgo a San Sepolcro, Piero dal (Piero della Francesca), 71, 82, 216
  • Borro, Battista, 262
  • Botticelli, Sandro (Alessandro Filipepi, or Sandro di Botticello), 3, 4, 82
  • Bramante da Urbino, Life, 137-148. 199-202, 216, 217, 223, 232, 237, 254
  • Bramantino, 217
  • Bresciano, Vincenzio (Vincenzio Zoppa or Foppa), 51, 52, 56
  • Bronzino, 179
  • Brunelleschi, Filippo (Filippo di Ser Brunellesco), 137, 185, 266
  • Bugiardini, Giuliano, 154, 161, 170, 186
  • Buglioni, Benedetto, 155
  • Buonarroti, Michelagnolo, 41, 43, 48, 65, 66, 74, 84, 85, 101, 104, 145, 157, 186, 187, 199, 201, 204, 209, 212, 215, 223, 224, 242-245, 259, 270
  • Buonconsigli, Giovanni, 52, 60
  • Buonfiglio, Benedetto, 17, 18
  • Busto, Agostino, 60
  • Cadore, Tiziano da, 114
  • Campagnola, Girolamo, 51, 55, 56
  • Campagnola, Giulio, 51, 56, 57
  • Caparra, Il (Niccolò Grosso), 268, 269
  • Caporali, Benedetto (Giovan Battista), 48, 75, 76
  • Caporali, Giulio, 48
  • Caradosso, 23, 144
  • Caravaggio, Polidoro da, 83, 237
  • Carnovale da Urbino, Fra (Fra Bartolommeo), 138
  • Caroto, Francesco, 60
  • Carpaccio (Scarpaccia), Vittore, Life, 51-61
  • Carpi, Ugo da, 233
  • Cartoni, Niccolò (Niccolò Zoccolo), 9, 10
  • Castagno, Andrea dal (Andrea degl' Impiccati), 82
  • Castel Bolognese, Giovanni da, 111
  • Castel della Pieve, Pietro da (Pietro Vannucci, or Pietro Perugino), Life, 33-48. 13, 15, 18, 33-48, 82, 159, 169, 210-212, 236, 242, 243
  • Castelfranco, Giorgione da, Life, 109-114. 82, 125
  • Catena, Vincenzio, 52, 58
  • Cecchino del Frate, 162
  • Ceraiuolo, Antonio del, 280
  • Cesare Cesariano, 138
  • Cianfanini, Benedetto, 162
  • Cimabue, Giovanni, 77
  • Claudio, Maestro, 254, 255
  • Conigliano, Giovan Battista da, 52, 58
  • Contucci, Andrea (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Cordegliaghi, Giovanetto, 52, 58, 59
  • Correggio, Antonio da, Life, 117-122. 83, 125
  • Cortona, Luca da (Luca Signorelli), Life, 71-76. 82, 216, 261
  • Cosimo, Andrea di, 129
  • Cosimo, Piero di, Life, 125-134
  • Cosimo Rosselli, 82, 125, 126, 151, 165
  • Credi, Lorenzo di, 153, 186, 280
  • Cristofano, 55
  • Cronaca, Il (Simone, or Simone del Pollaiuolo), Life, 265-275. 101
  • Davanzo, Jacopo (Jacopo Avanzi), 51, 55
  • Davanzo, Jacopo (of Milan), 60
  • Diamante, Fra, 3
  • Diana, Benedetto, 52, 60
  • Domenico Beceri, 283
  • Domenico di Paris, 47
  • Domenico Ghirlandajo, 36, 65, 82, 279
  • Domenico Pecori, 257
  • Domenico Puligo, Life, 279-283
  • Don Bartolommeo della Gatta (Abbot of S. Clemente), 41, 82, 216, 217
  • Donato (Donatello), 52, 152, 185
  • Dürer, Albrecht, 232
  • Ercole Ferrarese (Ercole da Ferrara), 82
  • Eusebio San Giorgio, 47
  • Fabiano di Stagio Sassoli, 256, 257
  • Ferrara, Stefano da, 56
  • Ferrarese, Ercole (Ercole da Ferrara), 82
  • Ferrarese, Galasso (Galasso Galassi), 55
  • Fiesole, Fra Giovanni da (Fra Angelico), 73, 154, 185
  • Filarete, Antonio, 56
  • Filipepi, Alessandro (Sandro Botticelli, or Sandro di Botticello), 3, 4, 82
  • Filippo Brunelleschi (Filippo di Ser Brunellesco), 137, 185, 266
  • Filippo Lippi (Filippino), Life, 3-10. 44, 82, 99, 100, 176, 177
  • Filippo Lippi, Fra, 3, 5, 9, 185
  • Fivizzano, 29
  • Flore, Jacobello de, 51, 55
  • Foppa, Vincenzio (Vincenzio Zoppa, or Vincenzio Bresciano), 51, 52, 56
  • Fra Angelico (Fra Giovanni da Fiesole), 73, 154, 185
  • Fra Bartolommeo (Fra Carnovale da Urbino), 138
  • Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco (Baccio della Porta), Life, 151-162. 82, 151-162, 165-167, 215, 244, 272
  • Fra Carnovale da Urbino (Fra Bartolommeo), 138.
  • Fra Diamante, 3
  • Fra Filippo Lippi, 3, 5, 9, 185
  • Fra Giocondo of Verona, 145
  • Fra Giovanni da Fiesole (Fra Angelico), 73, 154, 185
  • Fra Giovanni da Verona, 222
  • Fra Paolo Pistoiese, 162
  • Fra Sebastiano del Piombo, 84, 114, 240
  • Francesca, Piero della (Piero dal Borgo a San Sepolcro), 71, 82, 216
  • Francesco (Il Bacchiaccha), 46
  • Francesco (L'Indaco), 66, 67
  • Francesco, Maestro, 142
  • Francesco Bonsignori, 60
  • Francesco Caroto, 60
  • Francesco da Melzo, 99
  • Francesco da San Gallo, 134, 203, 204
  • Francesco Francia, Life, 23-29. 82
  • Francesco Giamberti, 134, 191
  • Francesco Granacci (Il Granaccio), 4, 169, 186
  • Francesco Masini, Messer, 227
  • Francesco Mazzuoli (Parmigiano), 83
  • Francesco Turbido (Il Moro), 61
  • Francia, Francesco, Life, 23-29. 82
  • Franciabigio, 170
  • Francione, 191, 192
  • Frate, Cecchino del, 162
  • Gabriele Rustici, 162
  • Gaddi, Agnolo, 52, 54
  • Galasso Ferrarese (Galasso Galassi), 55
  • Galieno, 179
  • Garbo, Raffaellino del, Life, 175-179. 6, 9
  • Gasparo Misceroni, 60
  • Gatta, Don Bartolommeo della (Abbot of S. Clemente), 41, 82, 216, 217
  • Gentile Bellini, 57, 59, 109
  • Gerino Pistoiese (Gerino da Pistoia), 18, 46
  • Gherardo, 36
  • Ghirlandajo, Domenico, 36, 65, 82, 279
  • Ghirlandajo, Ridolfo, 169, 212, 216, 279-281
  • Giamberti, Francesco, 134, 191
  • Gian Barile, 238
  • Gian Niccola, 47, 48
  • Giocondo of Verona, Fra, 145
  • Giorgio, Antonio di, 36
  • Giorgio Vasari. See Vasari (Giorgio)
  • Giorgione da Castelfranco, Life, 109-114. 82, 125
  • Giotto, 80
  • Giovan Battista da Conigliano, 52, 58
  • Giovan Battista (Benedetto) Caporali, 48, 75, 76
  • Giovan Francesco Penni, 237, 247
  • Giovan Francesco Rustici, 105, 186
  • Giovanetto Cordegliaghi, 52, 58, 59
  • Giovanni (Lo Spagna), 46, 47
  • Giovanni, Maestro, 260
  • Giovanni Antonio Bazzi (Sodoma), 72, 218
  • Giovanni Antonio Boltraffio, 105
  • Giovanni Bellini, 57, 58, 82, 109
  • Giovanni Buonconsigli. 52. 60
  • Giovanni Cimabue, 77
  • Giovanni da Castel Bolognese, 111
  • Giovanni da Fiesole, Fra (Fra Angelico), 73, 154, 185
  • Giovanni da Udine, 237, 239
  • Giovanni da Verona, Fra, 222
  • Giovanni de' Santi, 46, 210, 213, 249
  • Giovanni Mansueti, 52, 59
  • Giovanni Pisano, 142
  • Giovanni Rosto, 46
  • Girolamo Campagnola, 51, 55, 56
  • Girolamo Misceroni, 60
  • Girolamo Romanino, 60
  • Giromin Morzone, 55, 56
  • Giuliano Bugiardini, 154, 161, 170, 186
  • Giuliano da Maiano, 197
  • Giuliano da San Gallo, Life, 191-205. 101, 134, 145, 191-205, 270
  • Giuliano Leno, 147
  • Giulio Campagnola, 51, 56, 57
  • Giulio Caporali, 48
  • Giulio Romano, 76, 84, 119, 232, 237, 247
  • Giusto (of Padua), 51, 56
  • Gobbo, Andrea del, 122
  • Gotti, Baccio, 280
  • Granacci, Francesco (Il Granaccio), 4, 169, 186
  • Grosso, Niccolò (Il Caparra), 268, 269
  • Guerriero da Padova, 51, 56
  • Guglielmo da Marcilla (Guillaume de Marcillac), Life, 253-262
  • Il Bacchiaccha (Francesco), 46
  • Il Bassiti (Marco Basarini, or Marco Basaiti), 52, 58
  • Il Bologna, 237
  • Il Caparra (Niccolò Grosso), 268, 269
  • Il Cronaca (Simone, or Simone del Pollaiuolo), Life, 265-275. 101
  • Il Granaccio (Francesco Granacci), 4, 169, 186
  • Il Moro (Francesco Turbido), 61
  • Il Rosso, 84
  • Imola, Innocenzio da, 170
  • Impiccati, Andrea degl' (Andrea dal Castagno), 82
  • Indaco, L' (Francesco), 66, 67
  • Indaco, L' (Jacopo), Life, 65-67
  • Innocenzio da Imola, 170
  • Jacobello de Flore, 51, 55
  • Jacopo (L'Indaco), Life, 65-67
  • Jacopo Avanzi (Jacopo Davanzo), 51, 55
  • Jacopo Davanzo (of Milan), 60
  • Jacopo da Pontormo, 179, 246, 260
  • Lanzilago, Maestro, 6, 7
  • Lazzaro Scarpaccia (Sebastiano Scarpaccia, or Lazzaro Bastiani), 52, 57, 58
  • Lazzaro Vasari (the elder), 71, 82
  • Leno, Giuliano, 147
  • Leonardo da Vinci, Life. 89-105. 44, 82, 85, 89-105, 109, 127, 138, 151, 156, 196, 212, 215, 242, 270
  • Liberale, Maestro, 54
  • L'Indaco (Francesco), 66, 67
  • L'Indaco (Jacopo), Life, 65-67
  • L'Ingegno (Andrea Luigi), 47
  • Lippi, Filippo (Filippino), Life, 3-10. 44, 82, 99, 100, 176, 177
  • Lippi, Fra Filippo, 3, 5, 9, 185
  • Lo Spagna (Giovanni), 46, 47
  • Lombardo, Tullio, 60
  • Lorenzetto, 240
  • Lorenzo (father of Piero di Cosimo), 125
  • Lorenzo di Credi, 153, 186, 280
  • Luca da Cortona (Luca Signorelli), Life, 71-76. 82, 216, 261
  • Luca della Robbia (the younger), 237
  • Luca Signorelli (Luca da Cortona), Life, 71-76. 82, 216, 261
  • Luigi, Andrea (L'Ingegno), 47
  • Luigi Vivarini, 52
  • Maestro Claudio, 254, 255
  • Maestro Francesco, 142
  • Maestro Giovanni, 260
  • Maestro Lanzilago, 6, 7
  • Maestro Liberale, 54
  • Maestro Zeno, 60
  • Maiano, Benedetto da, 36, 151, 266, 267
  • Maiano, Giuliano da, 197
  • Mansueti, Giovanni, 52, 59
  • Mantegna, Andrea, 24, 55, 82
  • Marc' Antonio Bolognese, 232, 233
  • Marcilla, Guglielmo da (Guillaume de Marcillac), Life, 253-262
  • Marco Basaiti (Il Bassiti, or Marco Basarini), 52, 58
  • Marco da Ravenna, 233
  • Marco Oggioni, 105
  • Mariotto Albertinelli, Life, 165-171. 151, 154
  • Masaccio, 3, 185, 215
  • Masini, Messer Francesco, 227
  • Maso Papacello, 76
  • Maso Porro, 262
  • Masolino da Panicale, 3
  • Matteo (brother of Cronaca), 275
  • Maturino, 83
  • Mazzuoli, Francesco (Parmigiano), 83
  • Melzo, Francesco da, 99
  • Messer Francesco Masini, 227
  • Michelagnolo Buonarroti, 41, 43, 48, 65, 66, 74, 84, 85, 101, 104, 145, 157, 186, 187, 199, 201, 204, 209, 212, 215, 223, 224, 242-245. 259, 270
  • Misceroni, Gasparo, 60
  • Misceroni, Girolamo, 60
  • Modena, Pellegrino da, 237
  • Montagna, Bartolommeo, 52, 60
  • Monte Carlo, Bastiano da, 179
  • Montecavallo, Antonio, 140
  • Montelupo, Baccio da, 186
  • Montevarchi, 46
  • Monte Sansovino, Andrea dal (Andrea Contucci, or Andrea Sansovino), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Moreto, Niccolò, 57
  • Moretto, Alessandro, 60
  • Moro, Il (Francesco Turbido), 61
  • Morzone, Giromin, 55, 56
  • Niccola Pisano, 142
  • Niccolò Alunno, 18, 19
  • Niccolò Cartoni (Niccolò Zoccolo), 9, 10
  • Niccolò d' Arezzo, 55
  • Niccolò Grosso (Il Caparra), 268, 269
  • Niccolò Moreto, 57
  • Niccolò Soggi, 186
  • Niccolò Zoccolo (Niccolò Cartoni), 9, 10
  • Nunziata, Toto del, 280
  • Oggioni, Marco, 105
  • Orazio di Paris, 47
  • Padova, Guerriero da, 51, 56
  • Panicale, Masolino da, 3
  • Paolo da Verona, 179
  • Paolo Pistoiese, Fra, 162
  • Paolo Uccello, 185, 246
  • Papacello, Maso, 76
  • Paris, Domenico di, 47
  • Paris, Orazio di, 47
  • Parmigiano (Francesco Mazzuoli), 83
  • Pastorino da Siena, 262
  • Pecori, Domenico, 257
  • Pellegrino da Modena, 237
  • Penni, Giovan Francesco, 237, 247
  • Perino del Vaga, 84, 237, 254
  • Perugino, Pietro (Pietro Vannucci, or Pietro da Castel della Pieve), Life, 33-48. 13, 15, 18, 33-48, 82, 159, 169, 210-212, 236, 242, 243
  • Peruzzi, Baldassarre, 145, 146, 200
  • Pesello, 82
  • Pheidias, 105
  • Piero della Francesca (Piero dal Borgo a San Sepolcro), 71, 82, 216
  • Piero di Cosimo, Life, 125-134
  • Pietro Perugino (Pietro Vannucci, or Pietro da Castel della Pieve), Life, 33-48. 13, 15, 18, 33-48, 82, 159, 169, 210-212, 236, 242, 243
  • Pietro Rosselli, 159
  • Pinturicchio, Bernardino, Life, 13-19. 46, 65, 211, 212
  • Piombo, Fra Sebastiano del, 84, 114, 240
  • Pisano, Giovanni, 142
  • Pisano, Niccola, 142
  • Pistoiese, Fra Paolo, 162
  • Pistoiese, Gerino (Gerino da Pistoia), 18, 46
  • Polidoro da Caravaggio, 83, 237
  • Pollaiuolo, Antonio, 4, 81, 265
  • Pollaiuolo, Simone del (Simone, or Il Cronaca), Life, 265-275. 101
  • Pontormo, Jacopo da, 179, 246, 260
  • Porro, Maso, 262
  • Porta, Baccio della (Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco), Life, 151-162. 82, 151-162, 165-167, 215, 244, 272
  • Puligo, Domenico, Life, 279-283
  • Salai, 99
  • S. Clemente, Abbot of (Don Bartolommeo della Gatta), 41, 82, 216, 217
  • San Gallo, Antonio da, Life, 191-205. 145, 254
  • San Gallo, Aristotile da, 212
  • San Gallo, Francesco da, 134, 203, 204
  • San Gallo, Giuliano da, Life, 191-205. 101, 134, 145, 191-205, 270
  • San Gimignano, Vincenzio da, 237
  • San Giorgio, Eusebio, 47
  • San Marco, Fra Bartolommeo di (Baccio della Porta), Life, 151-162. 82, 151-162, 165-167, 215, 244, 272
  • Sandro Botticelli (Alessandro Filipepi, or Sandro di Botticello), 3, 4, 82
  • Sansovino, Andrea (Andrea Contucci, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), 5, 144, 186, 223, 270
  • Santi, 261
  • Santi, Giovanni de', 46, 210, 213, 249
  • Sanzio, Raffaello (Raffaello da Urbino), Life, 209-250. 13, 28, 29, 44-47, 82, 83, 143, 145, 146, 155-158, 200, 201, 203, 209-250, 255
  • Sarto, Andrea del, 83, 129, 134, 281, 283
  • Sassoli, Fabiano di Stagio, 256, 257
  • Sassoli, Stagio, 73, 257
  • Scarpaccia, Lazzaro (Sebastiano Scarpaccia, or Lazzaro Bastiani), 52, 57, 58
  • Scarpaccia, Sebastiano (Lazzaro Scarpaccia, or Lazzaro Bastiani), 52, 57, 58
  • Scarpaccia (Carpaccio), Vittore, Life, 51-61
  • Sebastiano del Piombo, Fra, 84, 114, 240
  • Sebastiano Scarpaccia (Lazzaro Scarpaccia, or Lazzaro Bastiani), 52, 57, 58
  • Sebeto da Verona, 51, 55
  • Siena, Pastorino da, 262
  • Signorelli, Luca (Luca da Cortona), Life, 71-76. 82, 216, 261
  • Simon Bianco, 60
  • Simone, 55
  • Simone (Simone del Pollaiuolo, or Il Cronaca), Life, 265-275. 101
  • Sodoma (Giovanni Antonio Bazzi), 72, 218
  • Soggi, Niccolò, 186
  • Spadari, Benedetto, 262
  • Spagna, Lo (Giovanni), 46, 47
  • Squarcione, 56
  • Stagio Sassoli, 73, 257
  • Stefano da Ferrara, 56
  • Stefano da Zevio (Stefano Veronese), 51-54
  • Stefano Veronese (Stefano da Zevio), 51-54
  • Tiziano da Cadore, 114
  • Tommaso, 76
  • Torrigiano, Life, 183-188
  • Toto del Nunziata, 280
  • Trevio, Bernardino da, 138
  • Tullio Lombardo, 60
  • Turbido, Francesco (Il Moro), 61
  • Zeno, Maestro, 60
  • Zeuxis, 82, 83
  • Zevio, Aldigieri (Altichiero) da, 51, 54, 55
  • Zevio, Stefano da (Stefano Veronese), 51-54
  • Zoccolo, Niccolò (Niccolò Cartoni), 9, 10
  • Zoppa, Vincenzio (Vincenzio Foppa, or Vincenzio Bresciano), 51, 52, 56
  • Zoppo, Rocco, 46

END OF VOL. IV.

PRINTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF CHAS. T. JACOBI OF THE CHISWICK PRESS, LONDON. THE COLOURED REPRODUCTIONS ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BY HENRY STONE AND SON, LTD., BANBURY

PRINTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF CHAS. T. JACOBI OF THE CHISWICK PRESS, LONDON. THE COLOURED REPRODUCTIONS ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BY HENRY STONE AND SON, LTD., BANBURY

FOOTNOTES:

[1] Pietro Perugino.

Pietro Perugino.

[2] This seems to be an error for Calistus III.

[2] This appears to be a mistake for Calistus III.

[3] The text says "Messer Bart...."

Mister Bart....

[4] Exchange or Bank.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Exchange or Bank.

[5] It is now generally accepted that these two men are one, under the name of Lazzaro Bastiani.

[5] It's now widely accepted that these two men are actually the same person, known as Lazzaro Bastiani.

[6] This master has been identified with Il Bassiti, under the name of Basaiti.

[6] This master has been recognized as Il Bassiti, going by the name Basaiti.

[7] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[7] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[8] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[8] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[9] A judicial court, the members of which sat in rotation.

[9] A court where the judges took turns sitting.

[10] Two accurate literal translations of the same original must often coincide; and in dealing with this beautiful Life, the translator has had to take the risk either of seeming to copy the almost perfect rendering of Mr. H. P. Horne, or of introducing unsatisfactory variants for mere variety's sake. Having rejected the latter course, he feels doubly bound to record once more his deep obligation to Mr. Horne's example.

[10] Two accurate literal translations of the same original must often match; and in working with this beautiful Life, the translator has had to choose between appearing to replicate the nearly perfect translation by Mr. H. P. Horne or introducing unsatisfactory variations just for the sake of variety. Having chosen the first option, he feels even more compelled to acknowledge once again his deep gratitude for Mr. Horne's example.

[11] This name is missing in the text.

[11] This name is not mentioned in the text.

[12] Signet-office, for the sealing of Papal Bulls and other papers of the Papal Court.

[12] Signet office, for sealing Papal Bulls and other documents from the Papal Court.

[13] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[13] See note on p. 57, Vol. I.

[14] The word "calavano" has been substituted here for the "cavavano" of the text, which gives no sense.

[14] The word "calavano" has replaced the "cavavano" in the text, which doesn’t make sense.

[15] These numbers are missing from the text.

[15] These numbers are absent from the text.

[16] The word "utilmente" is substituted here for the "ultimamente" of the text, which makes no sense.

[16] The word "utilmente" is replaced here for the "ultimamente" in the text, which doesn't make sense.

[17] The words of the text, "un quadro d' una spera," are a little obscure; but the translator has been strengthened in his belief that his rendering is correct by seeing a little picture, painted on a mirror, and numbered 7697, in the Victoria and Albert Museum. The subject of this picture, which the translator was enabled to see by the courtesy of Mr. B. S. Long, of the Department of Paintings, is the same as that of the work mentioned by Vasari, and it may be a copy.

[17] The phrase in the text, "un quadro d' una spera," is somewhat unclear; however, the translator feels more confident in his interpretation after viewing a small painting on a mirror, labeled 7697, at the Victoria and Albert Museum. The subject of this artwork, which the translator was able to view thanks to Mr. B. S. Long from the Department of Paintings, matches that of the piece referenced by Vasari, and it might be a reproduction.

[18] Florentine puff-pastry.

Florentine puff pastry.

[19] Don Vincenzio Borghini.

Don Vincenzio Borghini.

[20] Filippo Brunelleschi.

Filippo Brunelleschi.

[21] The name given in the text is Domenico.

[21] The name mentioned in the text is Domenico.

[22] A friable volcanic tufa.

A crumbly volcanic tufa.

[23] In the Life of Pinturicchio, Vasari says that this commission was given to Pinturicchio by Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini, who afterwards became Pope Pius III.

[23] In the Life of Pinturicchio, Vasari states that Cardinal Francesco Piccolomini, who later became Pope Pius III, assigned this commission to Pinturicchio.

[24] The text reads Palazzo, which is obviously an error for Papa.

[24] The text says Palazzo, which is clearly a mistake for Papa.

[25] This seems to be an error for Bartolommeo.

[25] This looks like a mistake for Bartolommeo.

[26] Villa Madama.

Villa Madama.

[27] The use of this word, though perhaps too modern, seems to the translator to be the only way to preserve the play of words in the text.

[27] Using this word, although it might feel a bit too contemporary, appears to the translator to be the only way to keep the wordplay in the text intact.

[28] Earnest-money.

Earnest money.

[29] Room in which the beans used in voting for the election of magistrates were counted.

[29] Room where the beans used for voting in the election of officials were counted.

[30] Office of those who had charge of the Specchio, the book in which were inscribed the names of such citizens as were in arrears with their taxes.

[30] Office of those responsible for the Specchio, the book that listed the names of citizens who were behind on their taxes.

Transcriber's note: Bold text is marked with =."

Transcriber's note: Bold text is marked with =."

Obvious printer's errors have been corrected, all other inconsistencies are as in the original. The author's spelling has been maintained.

Obvious printing errors have been fixed, and all other inconsistencies match the original. The author's spelling has been kept.



        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!