This is a modern-English version of Lives of the Most Eminent Painters Sculptors and Architects, Vol. 05 (of 10): Andrea da Fiesole to Lorenzo Lotto, originally written by Vasari, Giorgio.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
LIVES OF THE MOST EMINENT PAINTERS SCULPTORS & ARCHITECTS
BY
GIORGIO VASARI:
VOLUME V.
ANDREA DA FIESOLE TO LORENZO LOTTO
1913
NEWLY TRANSLATED BY GASTON Du C. DE VERE. WITH FIVE HUNDRED ILLUSTRATIONS: IN TEN VOLUMES

PHILIP LEE WARNER,
PUBLISHER TO THE MEDICI SOCIETY, LIMITED
7 GRAFTON
ST. LONDON, W. 1912-14
PHILIP LEE WARNER,
PUBLISHER TO THE MEDICI SOCIETY, LIMITED
7 GRAFTON
ST. LONDON, W. 1912-14
[Pg v] CONTENTS OF VOLUME V
PAGE | |
Andrea da Fiesole [Andrea Ferrucci] and Others | 1 |
Vincenzio da San Gimignano [Vincenzio Tamagni] and Timoteo da Urbino [Timoteo della Vite] | 9 |
Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci] | 19 |
Benedetto da Rovezzano | 33 |
Baccio da Montelupo and his son Raffaello | 39 |
Lorenzo di Credi | 47 |
Lorenzetto and Boccaccino | 53 |
Baldassarre Peruzzi | 61 |
Giovan Francesco Penni (known as Il Fattore) and Pellegrino da Modena | 75 |
Andrea del Sarto | 83 |
Madonna Properzia de' Rossi | 121 |
Alfonso Lombardi, Michelagnolo da Siena, Girolamo Santa Croce, and Dosso and Battista Dossi | 129 |
Giovanni Antonio Licinio from Pordenone, and Others | 143 |
Giovanni Antonio Sogliani | 157 |
Girolamo of Treviso | 167 |
Polidoro da Caravaggio and Maturino | 173 |
Il Rosso | 187 |
Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo and Others | 205 |
Franciabigio [Francia] | 215 |
Morto da Feltro and Andrea di Cosimo Feltrini | 225 |
Marco Calavrese | 235 |
Francesco Mazzuoli [Parmigiano] | 241 |
Jacopo Palma [Palma Vecchio] and Lorenzo Lotto | 257 |
Name Index | 267 |
[Pg vii] ILLUSTRATIONS TO VOLUME V
PLATES IN COLOUR
Timoteo da Urbino (Timoteo della Vite) | A Muse | Florence: Corsini Gallery | 10 |
Lorenzo di Credi | Venus | Florence: Uffizi, 3452 | 48 |
Bernardino del Lupino (Luini) | S. Catharine borne to her Tomb by Angels | Milan: Brera, 288 | 54 |
Andrea del Sarto | Madonna dell' Arpie | Florence: Uffizi, 1112 | 94 |
Dosso Dossi | A Nymph with a Satyr | Florence: Pitti, 147 | 140 |
Franciabigio (Francia) | Portrait of a Man | Vienna: Prince Liechtenstein | 222 |
Lorenzo Lotto | The Triumph of Chastity | Rome: Rospigliosi Gallery | 258 |
Jacopo Palma (Palma Vecchio) | S. Barbara | Venice: S. Maria Formosa | 260 |
Rondinello (Niccolò Rondinelli) | Madonna and Child | Paris: Louvre, 1159 | 264 |
PLATES IN MONOCHROME
Andrea Ferrucci | Font | Pistoia: Duomo | 6 |
Silvio Cosini (Silvio of Fiesole) | Tomb of Raffaele Maffei | Volterra: S. Lino | 8 |
Vincenzio da San Gimignano (Vincenzio Tamagni) | The Birth of the Virgin | San Gimignano: S. Agostino, Cappella del S. Sacramento | 12 |
Timoteo da Urbino (Timoteo della Vite) | Madonna and Saints, with a Child Angel | Milan: Brera, 508 | 12 |
Timoteo da Urbino (Timoteo della Vite) | The Magdalene | Bologna: Accademia, 204 | 16 |
Andrea dal Monte Sansovino (Andrea Contucci) | Altar-piece | Florence: S. Spirito | 22 |
[Pg viii] Andrea dal Monte Sansovino (Andrea Contucci) | Tomb of Cardinal Ascanio Sforza | Rome: S. Maria del Popolo | 24 |
Andrea dal Monte Sansovino (Andrea Contucci) | The Madonna and Child, with S. Anne | Rome: S. Agostino | 26 |
Benedetto da Rovezzano | Tomb of Piero Soderini | Florence: S. Maria del Carmine | 38 |
Baccio from Montelupo | S. John the Evangelist | Florence: Or San Michele | 42 |
Agostino Busti (The Bambaja) | Detail from the Tomb: Head of Gaston de Foix | Milan: Brera | 44 |
Raffaello from Montelupo | S. Damiano | Florence: New Sacristy of S. Lorenzo | 44 |
Lorenzo di Credi | Andrea Verrocchio | Florence: Uffizi, 1163 | 50 |
Lorenzo di Credi | Madonna and Child, with Saints | Paris: Louvre, 1263 | 52 |
Lorenzo di Credi | The Nativity | Florence: Accademia, 92 | 52 |
Lorenzetto | Elijah | Rome: S. Maria del Popolo, Chigi Chapel | 56 |
Lorenzetto | S. Peter | Rome: Ponte S. Angelo | 56 |
Boccaccino | Madonna and Child, with Saints | Rome: Doria Gallery, 125 | 58 |
Bernardino Luini | The Marriage of the Virgin | Saronno: Santuario della Beata Vergine | 60 |
Baldassarre Peruzzi | Cupola of the Ponzetti Chapel | Rome: S. Maria della Pace | 64 |
Baldassarre Peruzzi | Palazzo della Farnesina | Rome | 66 |
Baldassarre Peruzzi | Courtyard of Palazzo Massimi | Rome | 70 |
Giovanni Francesco Penni (The Factor) | The Baptism of Constantine | Rome: The Vatican | 78 |
Gaudenzio Milanese (Gaudenzio Ferrari) | The Last Supper | Milan: S. Maria della Passione | 80 |
Andrea del Sarto | "Noli Me Tangere" | Florence: Uffizi, 93 | 86 |
Andrea del Sarto | The Last Supper | Florence: S. Salvi | 88 |
Andrea del Sarto | The Arrival of the Magi | Florence: SS. Annunziata | 90 |
Andrea del Sarto | Charity | Paris: Louvre, 1514 | 98 |
Andrea del Sarto | Cæsar receiving the Tribute of Egypt | Florence: Poggio a Caiano | 104 |
Andrea del Sarto | Portrait of the Artist | Florence: Uffizi, 280 | 112 |
Madonna Properzia de' Rossi | Two Angels (with The Assumption of the Virgin, after Tribolo) | Bologna: S. Petronio | 126 |
Alfonso Lombardi | The Death of the Virgin | Bologna: S. Maria della Vita | 134 |
Michelangelo da Siena | Tomb of Adrian VI | Rome: S. Maria dell' Anima | 136 |
Girolamo Santa Croce | Madonna and Child, with SS. Peter and John | Naples: Monte Oliveto | 138 |
Dosso Dossi | Madonna and Child, with SS. George and Michael | Modena: Pinacoteca, 437 | 140 |
Giovanni Antonio Licinio from Pordenone | The Disputation of S. Catharine | Piacenza: S. Maria di Campagna | 150 |
Giovanni Antonio Licinio from Pordenone | The Adoration of the Magi | Treviso: Duomo | 152 |
Giovanni Antonio Sogliani | The Legend of S. Dominic | Florence: S. Marco | 162 |
The Red | Madonna and Child, with Saints | Florence: Uffizi, 47 | 190 |
The Red | The Transfiguration | Città di Castello: Duomo | 198 |
Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo | The Holy Family, with Saints | Bologna: Accademia, 133 | 208 |
Amico of Bologna (Amico Aspertini) | The Adoration | Bologna: Pinacoteca, 297 | 210 |
Innocenzio from Imola | The Marriage of S. Catharine | Bologna: S. Giacomo Maggiore | 214 |
Franciabigio (Francia) | The Marriage of the Virgin | Florence: SS. Annunziata | 218 |
Francesco Mazzuoli (Parmigiano) | The Marriage of S. Catharine | Parma: Gallery, 192 | 246 |
Francesco Mazzuoli (Parmigiano Reggiano) | Madonna and Child, with Saints | Bologna: Accademia, 116 | 250 |
Jacopo Palma (Palma Vecchio) | S. Sebastian | Venice: S. Maria Formosa | 260 |
Lorenzo Lotto | The Glorification of S. Nicholas | Venice: S. Maria del Carmine | 262 |
Lorenzo Lotto | Andrea Odoni | Hampton Court Palace | 262 |
Rondinello (Niccolò Rondinelli) | Madonna and Child, with Saints | Ravenna: Accademia | 264 |
Francesco from Cotignola | The Adoration of the Shepherds | Ravenna: Accademia | 266 |
CORRIGENDUM
P. 151, l. 13, Vicenza is an error of the Italian text for Piacenza, the church referred to being in the latter town
P. 151, l. 13, Vicenza is a mistake in the Italian text for Piacenza, with the church mentioned located in the latter town.
[Pg 1] ANDREA DA FIESOLE
[Pg 3] LIVES OF ANDREA DA FIESOLE
[ANDREA FERRUCCI]
SCULPTOR
AND OF OTHER CRAFTSMEN OF FIESOLE
Seeing that it is no less necessary for sculptors to have mastery over their carving-tools than it is for him who practises painting to be able to handle colours, it therefore happens that many who work very well in clay prove to be unable to carry their labours to any sort of perfection in marble; and some, on the contrary, work very well in marble, without having any more knowledge of design than a certain instinct for a good manner, I know not what, that they have in their minds, derived from the imitation of certain things which please their judgment, and which their imagination absorbs and proceeds to use for its own purposes. And it is almost a marvel to see the manner in which some sculptors, without in any way knowing how to draw on paper, nevertheless bring their works to a fine and praiseworthy completion with their chisels. This was seen in Andrea, a sculptor of Fiesole, the son of Piero di Marco Ferrucci, who learnt the rudiments of sculpture in his earliest boyhood from Francesco di Simone Ferrucci, another sculptor of Fiesole. And although at the beginning he learnt only to carve foliage, yet little by little he became so well practised in his work that it was not long before he set himself to making figures; insomuch that, having a swift and resolute hand, he executed his works in marble rather with a certain judgment and skill derived from nature than with any knowledge of design. Nevertheless, he afterwards gave a little more attention to art, when, in the flower of his youth, he followed Michele [Pg 4] Maini, likewise a sculptor of Fiesole; which Michele made the S. Sebastian of marble in the Minerva at Rome, which was so much praised in those days.
Seeing that it’s just as important for sculptors to master their carving tools as it is for painters to handle colors, it's common for people who work well in clay to struggle to achieve the same level of perfection in marble. On the other hand, some sculptors excel in marble without having much knowledge of design, relying instead on an instinctive sense of style that comes from mimicking things they find visually appealing, which their imagination then processes for its own use. It’s almost remarkable to watch how some sculptors, despite not knowing how to sketch, still manage to create impressive and refined works with their chisels. This was true for Andrea, a sculptor from Fiesole, the son of Piero di Marco Ferrucci, who learned the basics of sculpting in his early childhood from Francesco di Simone Ferrucci, another sculptor from Fiesole. Although he initially focused on carving leaves, he gradually became so skilled that he soon began creating figures. Blessed with a quick and determined hand, he approached his marble works with a sense of judgment and natural skill rather than formal design knowledge. However, he later paid more attention to art when, in his youth, he studied under Michele [Pg 4] Maini, another sculptor from Fiesole, who created the marble S. Sebastian in the Minerva at Rome, a piece that received much acclaim in its time.
Andrea, then, having been summoned to work at Imola, built a chapel of grey-stone, which was much extolled, in the Innocenti in that city. After that work, he went to Naples at the invitation of Antonio di Giorgio of Settignano, a very eminent engineer, and architect to King Ferrante, with whom Antonio was in such credit, that he had charge not only of all the buildings in that kingdom, but also of all the most important affairs of State. On arriving in Naples, Andrea was set to work, and he executed many things for that King in the Castello di San Martino and in other parts of that city. Now Antonio died; and after the King had caused him to be buried with obsequies suited rather to a royal person than to an architect, and with twenty pairs of mourners following him to the grave, Andrea, recognizing that this was no country for him, departed from Naples and made his way back to Rome, where he stayed for some time, attending to the studies of his art, and also to some work.
Andrea, after being called to work in Imola, built a highly praised grey-stone chapel in the Innocenti area of that city. Following that project, he went to Naples at the invitation of Antonio di Giorgio of Settignano, a prominent engineer and architect for King Ferrante. Antonio was so well-regarded that he oversaw not only all the buildings in the kingdom but also many significant state affairs. Upon arriving in Naples, Andrea got to work and completed numerous projects for the King at the Castello di San Martino and other locations in the city. Unfortunately, Antonio passed away, and after the King arranged a funeral with honors fit for royalty—including twenty pairs of mourners—Andrea realized that this was not the right place for him. He left Naples and returned to Rome, where he spent some time focusing on his artistic studies and working on various projects.
Afterwards, having returned to Tuscany, he built the marble chapel containing the baptismal font in the Church of S. Jacopo at Pistoia, and with much diligence executed the basin of that font, with all its ornamentation. And on the main wall of the chapel he made two lifesize figures in half-relief—namely, S. John baptizing Christ, a work executed very well and with a beautiful manner. At the same time he made some other little works, of which there is no need to make mention. I must say, indeed, that although these things were wrought by Andrea rather with the skill of his hand than with art, yet there may be perceived in them a boldness and an excellence of taste worthy of great praise. And, in truth, if such craftsmen had a thorough knowledge of design united to their practised skill and judgment, they would vanquish in excellence those who, drawing perfectly, only hack the marble when they set themselves to work it, and toil at it painfully with a sorry result, through not having practice and not knowing how to handle the tools with the skill that is necessary.
After returning to Tuscany, he built the marble chapel with the baptismal font in the Church of S. Jacopo at Pistoia, and he worked diligently on the basin of that font, along with all its decorations. On the main wall of the chapel, he created two lifesize figures in half-relief—specifically, S. John baptizing Christ, a piece executed very well and with a beautiful style. At the same time, he made some other small works, but there's no need to mention them. I must say, though, that while these pieces were crafted by Andrea more through his hand's skill than through artistic design, they show a boldness and an excellent taste that deserve great praise. In fact, if such craftsmen had a deep understanding of design combined with their honed skill and judgment, they would surpass in excellence those who, though skilled at drawing perfectly, only chip away at the marble when they work on it, struggling with poor results because they lack practice and don't know how to handle the tools with the required skill.
After these works, Andrea executed a marble panel that was placed [Pg 5] exactly between the two flights of steps that ascend to the upper choir in the Church of the Vescovado at Fiesole; in which panel he made three figures in the round and some scenes in low-relief. And for S. Girolamo, at Fiesole, he made the little marble panel that is built into the middle of the church. Having come into repute by reason of the fame of these works, Andrea was commissioned by the Wardens of Works of S. Maria del Fiore, at the time when Cardinal Giulio de' Medici was governing Florence, to make a statue of an Apostle four braccia in height; at that time, I mean, when four other similar statues were allotted at one and the same moment to four other masters—one to Benedetto da Maiano, another to Jacopo Sansovino, a third to Baccio Bandinelli, and the fourth to Michelagnolo Buonarroti; which statues were eventually to be twelve in number, and were to be placed in that part of that magnificent temple where there are the Apostles painted by the hand of Lorenzo di Bicci. Andrea, then, executed his rather with fine skill and judgment than with design; and he acquired thereby, if not as much praise as the others, at least the name of a good and practised master. Wherefore he was almost continually employed ever afterwards by the Wardens of Works of that church; and he made the head of Marsilius Ficinus that is to be seen therein, within the door that leads to the chapter-house. He made, also, a marble fountain that was sent to the King of Hungary, which brought him great honour; and by his hand was a marble tomb that was sent, likewise, to Strigonia, a city of Hungary. In this tomb was a Madonna, very well executed, with other figures; and in it was afterwards laid to rest the body of the Cardinal of Strigonia. To Volterra Andrea sent two Angels of marble in the round; and for Marco del Nero, a Florentine, he made a lifesize Crucifix of wood, which is now in the Church of S. Felicita at Florence. He made a smaller one for the Company of the Assumption in Fiesole. Andrea also delighted in architecture, and he was the master of Mangone, the stonecutter and architect, who afterwards erected many palaces and other buildings in Rome in a passing good manner.
After these works, Andrea created a marble panel that was placed [Pg 5] right between the two sets of steps leading up to the upper choir in the Church of the Vescovado in Fiesole. In this panel, he carved three life-sized figures and some scenes in low relief. For S. Girolamo in Fiesole, he made a small marble panel that’s built into the center of the church. Gaining recognition because of these works, Andrea was commissioned by the Wardens of Works of S. Maria del Fiore, at the time when Cardinal Giulio de' Medici was in charge of Florence, to create a statue of an Apostle that was four braccia tall; this was when four other similar statues were assigned to four other artists at the same time—one to Benedetto da Maiano, another to Jacopo Sansovino, a third to Baccio Bandinelli, and the fourth to Michelangelo Buonarroti; in the end, there were to be twelve statues, and they were to be placed in that part of the grand temple where the Apostles were painted by Lorenzo di Bicci. Andrea executed his statue with more skill and judgment than a detailed design; and as a result, he didn’t receive as much praise as the others, but he did earn a reputation as a good and experienced master. As a result, he was almost constantly employed afterward by the Wardens of Works of that church; he created the head of Marsilius Ficinus that you can see there, in the doorway leading to the chapter house. He also made a marble fountain that was sent to the King of Hungary, which brought him significant acclaim; and he crafted a marble tomb that was also sent to Strigonia, a city in Hungary. This tomb featured a beautifully executed Madonna along with other figures, and inside it was later laid to rest the body of the Cardinal of Strigonia. Andrea sent two life-sized marble Angels to Volterra; and for Marco del Nero, a Florentine, he made a life-size wooden Crucifix, which is now in the Church of S. Felicita in Florence. He also created a smaller one for the Company of the Assumption in Fiesole. Andrea had a passion for architecture as well, and he taught Mangone, the stonecutter and architect, who went on to build many palaces and other structures in Rome quite successfully.
In the end, having grown old, Andrea gave his attention only to mason's work, like one who, being a modest and worthy person, loved a [Pg 6] quiet life more than anything else. He received from Madonna Antonia Vespucci the commission for a tomb for her husband, Messer Antonio Strozzi; but since he could not work much himself, the two Angels were made for him by Maso Boscoli of Fiesole, his disciple, who afterwards executed many works in Rome and elsewhere, and the Madonna was made by Silvio Cosini of Fiesole, although it was not set into place immediately after it was finished, which was in the year 1522, because Andrea died, and was buried by the Company of the Scalzo in the Church of the Servi.
In the end, as he grew older, Andrea focused only on masonry, like someone who, being a humble and respectable person, valued a quiet life above all else. He received a commission from Madonna Antonia Vespucci to create a tomb for her husband, Messer Antonio Strozzi. However, since he couldn't do much of the work himself, two Angels were crafted for him by his disciple Maso Boscoli from Fiesole, who later completed many projects in Rome and elsewhere, and the Madonna was made by Silvio Cosini, also from Fiesole. It wasn't placed immediately after it was finished in 1522 because Andrea passed away and was buried by the Company of the Scalzo in the Church of the Servi.

FONT
(After Andrea da Fiesole [Andrea Ferrucci].
Pistoia: Duomo)
Brogi
View larger image
FONT
(After Andrea da Fiesole [Andrea Ferrucci].
Pistoia: Duomo)
Brogi
View larger image
Silvio, when the said Madonna was set into place and the tomb of the Strozzi completely finished, pursued the art of sculpture with extraordinary zeal; wherefore he afterwards executed many works in a graceful and beautiful manner, and surpassed a host of other masters, above all in the bizarre fancy of his grotesques, as may be seen in the sacristy of Michelagnolo Buonarroti, from some carved marble capitals over the pilasters of the tombs, with some little masks so well hollowed out that there is nothing better to be seen. In the same place he made some friezes with very beautiful masks in the act of crying out; wherefore Buonarroti, seeing the genius and skill of Silvio, caused him to begin certain trophies to complete those tombs, but they remained unfinished, with other things, by reason of the siege of Florence. Silvio executed a tomb for the Minerbetti in their chapel in the tramezzo[1] of the Church of S. Maria Novella, as well as any man could, since, in addition to the beautiful shape of the sarcophagus, there are carved upon it various shields, helmet-crests, and other fanciful things, and all with as much design as could be desired in such a work. Being at Pisa in the year 1528, Silvio made there an Angel that was wanting over a column on the high-altar of the Duomo, to face the one by Tribolo; and he made it so like the other that it could not be more like even if it were by the same hand. In the Church of Monte Nero, near Livorno, he made a little panel of marble with two figures, for the Frati Ingesuati; and at Volterra he made a tomb for Messer Raffaello da Volterra, a man of great learning, wherein he portrayed him from nature on a sarcophagus of marble, [Pg 7] with some ornaments and figures. Afterwards, while the siege of Florence was going on, Niccolò Capponi, a most honourable citizen, died at Castel Nuovo della Garfagnana on his return from Genoa, where he had been as Ambassador from his Republic to the Emperor; and Silvio was sent in great haste to make a cast of his head, to the end that he might afterwards make one in marble, having already executed a very beautiful one in wax.
Silvio, after the Madonna was installed and the Strozzi tomb was completely finished, threw himself into sculpture with incredible enthusiasm. As a result, he created many works that were both graceful and beautiful, surpassing many other artists, especially in the unique style of his grotesques, as seen in Michelangelo Buonarroti's sacristy, including some intricately carved marble capitals above the tombs with little masks so well crafted that nothing could be better. In the same area, he created friezes with stunning masks that appear to cry out. Because of this brilliance and skill, Buonarroti had Silvio start on trophies to complete those tombs, which unfortunately remained unfinished, along with other projects, due to the siege of Florence. Silvio also created a tomb for the Minerbetti family in their chapel in the tramezzo[1] of the Church of S. Maria Novella, executed as well as any man could, since the sarcophagus not only had a beautiful shape but was also decorated with various shields, helmet crests, and other fanciful designs, all with as much detail as one could hope for in such a work. While in Pisa in 1528, Silvio crafted an angel to go above a column on the high altar of the Duomo, complementing the one made by Tribolo, and it was so comparable to the original that it couldn't have been any more similar even if it were by the same hand. In the Church of Monte Nero near Livorno, he made a small marble panel with two figures for the Frati Ingesuati. At Volterra, he designed a tomb for Messer Raffaello da Volterra, an extremely learned man, where he portrayed him from life on a marble sarcophagus, [Pg 7] adorned with various ornaments and figures. Later, during the siege of Florence, Niccolò Capponi, a highly respected citizen, passed away at Castel Nuovo della Garfagnana while returning from Genoa, where he had served as Ambassador from his Republic to the Emperor. Silvio was quickly sent to make a cast of his head, so he could later sculpt it in marble, having already created an exquisite version in wax.
Now Silvio lived for some time with all his family in Pisa; and since he belonged to the Company of the Misericordia, which in that city accompanies those condemned to death to the place of execution, there once came into his head, being sacristan at that time, the strangest caprice in the world. One night he took out of the grave the body of one who had been hanged the day before; and, after having dissected it for the purposes of his art, being a whimsical fellow, and perhaps a wizard, and ready to believe in enchantments and suchlike follies, he flayed it completely, and with the skin, prepared after a method that he had been taught, he made a jerkin, which he wore for some time over his shirt, believing that it had some great virtue, without anyone ever knowing of it. But having once been upbraided by a good Father to whom he had confessed the matter, he pulled off the jerkin and laid it to rest in a grave, as the monk had urged him to do. Many other similar stories could be told of this man, but, since they have nothing to do with our history, I will pass them over in silence.
Now Silvio lived with his whole family in Pisa for a while; and since he was part of the Company of the Misericordia, which in that city accompanies those sentenced to death to their execution, one day he had the strangest idea. One night, while he was serving as sacristan, he took the body of someone who had been hanged the day before out of the grave. Being a quirky guy and maybe a bit of a wizard, and open to believing in magic and other nonsense, he completely skinned the body and, using the skin prepared in a way he had learned, made a jerkin. He wore it over his shirt for a while, convinced it had some special power, without anyone ever finding out. However, after being reprimanded by a good Father he had confessed to, he took off the jerkin and buried it, as the monk had advised. Many other similar stories could be told about this man, but since they have nothing to do with our story, I’ll leave them unsaid.
After the death of his first wife in Pisa, Silvio went off to Carrara. There he remained to execute some works, and took another wife, with whom, no long time after, he went to Genoa, where, entering the service of Prince Doria, he made a most beautiful escutcheon of marble over the door of his palace, and many ornaments in stucco all over that palace, after the directions given to him by the painter Perino del Vaga. He made, also, a very beautiful portrait in marble of the Emperor Charles V. But since it was Silvio's habit never to stay long in one place—for he was a wayward person—he grew weary of his prosperity in Genoa, and set out to make his way to France. He departed, therefore, but before arriving at Monsanese he turned back, and, stopping at Milan, he executed [Pg 8] in the Duomo some scenes and figures and many ornaments, with much credit for himself. And there, finally, he died at the age of forty-five. He was a man of fine genius, capricious, very dexterous in any kind of work, and a person who could execute with great diligence anything to which he turned his hand. He delighted in composing sonnets and improvising songs, and in his early youth he gave his attention to arms. If he had concentrated his mind on sculpture and design, he would have had no equal; and, even as he surpassed his master Andrea Ferrucci, so, had he lived, he would have surpassed many others who have enjoyed the name of excellent masters.
After the death of his first wife in Pisa, Silvio went to Carrara. He stayed there to work on some projects and married again. Not long after, he moved to Genoa, where he joined the service of Prince Doria. There, he created a stunning marble escutcheon above the door of the palace and many stucco decorations throughout the building, following the guidance of the painter Perino del Vaga. He also sculpted a beautiful marble portrait of Emperor Charles V. However, Silvio had a habit of not staying in one place for long—he was quite unpredictable—so he grew tired of his success in Genoa and decided to head to France. He set off, but before he reached Monsanese, he turned back and stopped in Milan, where he worked on [Pg 8] in the Duomo, creating scenes, figures, and many ornaments, earning a solid reputation for himself. Ultimately, he died there at the age of forty-five. He had a brilliant mind, was capricious, very skilled in various types of work, and could execute anything he put his mind to with great dedication. He enjoyed writing sonnets and improvising songs and, in his early years, focused on weapons. If he had dedicated himself to sculpture and design, he would have been unmatched; and just as he surpassed his master Andrea Ferrucci, had he lived longer, he would have outshone many others celebrated as master artists.
There flourished at the same time as Andrea and Silvio another sculptor of Fiesole, called Il Cicilia, who was a person of much skill; and a work by his hand may be seen in the Church of S. Jacopo, in the Campo Corbolini at Florence—namely, the tomb of the Chevalier Messer Luigi Tornabuoni, which is much extolled, particularly because he made therein the escutcheon of that Chevalier, in the form of a horse's head, as if to show, according to the ancient belief, that the shape of shields was originally taken from the head of a horse.
At the same time as Andrea and Silvio, there was another sculptor from Fiesole named Il Cicilia, who was quite skilled. You can see his work in the Church of S. Jacopo, in the Campo Corbolini in Florence—specifically, the tomb of the Chevalier Messer Luigi Tornabuoni, which is highly praised, especially because he included the Chevalier's emblem in the shape of a horse's head, suggesting, in line with ancient beliefs, that shield shapes were originally inspired by horse heads.
About the same time, also, Antonio da Carrara, a very rare sculptor, made three statues in Palermo for the Duke of Monteleone, a Neapolitan of the house of Pignatella, and Viceroy of Sicily—namely, three figures of Our Lady in different attitudes and manners, which were placed over three altars in the Duomo of Monteleone in Calabria. For the same patron he made some scenes in marble, which are in Palermo. He left behind him a son who is also a sculptor at the present day, and no less excellent than was his father.
About the same time, Antonio da Carrara, a very rare sculptor, created three statues in Palermo for the Duke of Monteleone, a Neapolitan from the Pignatella family, who was the Viceroy of Sicily. These were three figures of Our Lady in different poses and styles, placed over three altars in the Duomo of Monteleone in Calabria. He also made some marble scenes for the same patron, which are in Palermo. He left behind a son who is also a sculptor today, just as talented as his father was.

TOMB OF RAFFAELE MAFFEI
(After Silvio Cosini [Silvio da Fiesole].
Volterra: S. Lino)
Alinari
View larger image
TOMB OF RAFFAELE MAFFEI
(After Silvio Cosini [Silvio da Fiesole].
Volterra: S. Lino)
Alinari
View larger image
[Pg 9] VINCENZIO DA SAN GIMIGNANO AND TIMOTEO DA URBINO

TIMOTEO DA URBINO (TIMOTEO VITI): A MUSE
(Florence: Corsini Gallery. Panel)
View larger image
TIMOTEO DA URBINO (TIMOTEO VITI): A MUSE
(Florence: Corsini Gallery. Panel)
View larger image
[Pg 11] LIVES OF VINCENZIO DA SAN GIMIGNANO AND TIMOTEO DA URBINO
[TIMOTEO DELLA VITE]
PAINTERS
Having now to write, after the Life of the sculptor Andrea da Fiesole, the Lives of two excellent painters, Vincenzio da San Gimignano of Tuscany, and Timoteo da Urbino, I propose to speak first of Vincenzio, as the man whose portrait is above,[2] and immediately afterwards of Timoteo, since they lived almost at one and the same time, and were both disciples and friends of Raffaello.
Having to write now, after the Life of the sculptor Andrea da Fiesole, about the Lives of two outstanding painters, Vincenzio da San Gimignano from Tuscany, and Timoteo da Urbino, I want to start with Vincenzio, as the man whose portrait is above,[2] and then immediately discuss Timoteo, since they lived around the same time and were both students and friends of Raffaello.
Vincenzio, then, working in company with many others in the Papal Loggie for the gracious Raffaello da Urbino, acquitted himself in such a manner that he was much extolled by Raffaello and by all the others. Having therefore been set to work in the Borgo, opposite to the Palace of Messer Giovanni Battista dall' Aquila, with great credit to himself he painted on a façade a frieze in terretta, in which he depicted the Nine Muses, with Apollo in the centre, and above them some lions, the device of the Pope, which are held to be very beautiful. Vincenzio showed great diligence in his manner and softness in his colouring, and his figures were very pleasing in aspect; in short, he always strove to imitate the manner of Raffaello da Urbino, as may also be seen in the same Borgo, opposite to the Palace of the Cardinal of Ancona, from the façade of a house that was built by Messer Giovanni Antonio Battiferro of Urbino, who, in consequence of the strait friendship that he had with Raffaello, received from him the design for that façade, and also, through his good offices, many benefits and rich revenues at the Court. In this design, then, [Pg 12] which was afterwards carried into execution by Vincenzio, Raffaello drew, in allusion to the name of the Battiferri, the Cyclopes forging thunderbolts for Jove, and in another part Vulcan making arrows for Cupid, with some most beautiful nudes and other very lovely scenes and statues. The same Vincenzio painted a great number of scenes on a façade in the Piazza di S. Luigi de' Francesi at Rome, such as the Death of Cæsar, a Triumph of Justice, and a battle of horsemen in a frieze, executed with spirit and much diligence; and in this work, close to the roof, between the windows, he painted some Virtues that are very well wrought. In like manner, on the façade of the Epifani, behind the Curia di Pompeo, and near the Campo di Fiore, he painted the Magi following the Star; with an endless number of other works throughout that city, the air and position of which seem to be in great measure the reason that men are inspired to produce marvellous works there. Experience teaches us, indeed, that very often the same man has not the same manner and does not produce work of equal excellence in every place, but makes it better or worse according to the nature of the place.
Vincenzio, working alongside many others in the Papal Loggie for the talented Raffaello da Urbino, performed so well that he received high praise from Raffaello and his colleagues. He was assigned to work in the Borgo, across from the Palace of Messer Giovanni Battista dall'Aquila, where he painted a frieze in terretta on a façade featuring the Nine Muses with Apollo at the center, and above them some lions, which are the emblem of the Pope, considered to be very beautiful. Vincenzio demonstrated great diligence in his technique and softness in his coloring, and his figures were very pleasing to the eye; in short, he always aimed to imitate the style of Raffaello da Urbino, as can also be seen in the same Borgo, opposite the Palace of the Cardinal of Ancona, on the façade of a building constructed by Messer Giovanni Antonio Battiferro of Urbino, who, due to his close friendship with Raffaello, received the design for that façade from him and many other benefits and wealth at the Court. In this design, then, [Pg 12] which was later executed by Vincenzio, Raffaello illustrated, in reference to the name Battiferri, the Cyclopes forging thunderbolts for Jove, and in another section, Vulcan crafting arrows for Cupid, alongside some beautiful nudes and other lovely scenes and statues. Vincenzio also painted many scenes on a façade in the Piazza di S. Luigi de' Francesi in Rome, such as the Death of Cæsar, a Triumph of Justice, and a battle of horsemen in a frieze, executed with energy and great care; in this work, near the top, between the windows, he painted some finely crafted Virtues. Similarly, on the façade of the Epifani, behind the Curia di Pompeo and near the Campo di Fiore, he painted the Magi following the Star, along with countless other works throughout the city, whose atmosphere and location seem to greatly inspire people to create marvelous works. Experience teaches us that often the same person does not maintain the same style or produce equally excellent work everywhere but rather makes it better or worse depending on the nature of the place.

THE BIRTH OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Vincenzio da San Gimignano [Vincenzio Tamagni].
San Gimignano: S. Agostino)
Brogi
View larger image
THE BIRTH OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Vincenzio da San Gimignano [Vincenzio Tamagni].
San Gimignano: S. Agostino)
Brogi
View larger image
Vincenzio being in very good repute in Rome, there took place in the year 1527 the ruin and sack of that unhappy city, which had been the mistress of the nations. Whereupon, grieved beyond measure, he returned to his native city of San Gimignano; and there, by reason of the sufferings that he had undergone, and the weakening of his love for art, now that he was away from the air which nourishes men of fine genius and makes them bring forth works of the rarest merit, he painted some things that I will pass over in silence, in order not to veil with them the renown and the great name that he had honourably acquired in Rome. It is enough to point out clearly that violence turns the most lofty intellects roughly aside from their chief goal, and makes them direct their steps into the opposite path; which may also be seen in a companion of Vincenzio, called Schizzone, who executed some works in the Borgo that were highly extolled, and also in the Campo Santo of Rome and in S. Stefano degl' Indiani, and who was likewise caused by the senseless soldiery to turn aside from art and in a short time to [Pg 13] lose his life. Vincenzio died in his native city of San Gimignano, having had but little gladness in his life after his departure from Rome.
Vincenzio was well-respected in Rome when, in 1527, the city faced destruction and looting, leading to its tragic fall as a once-great power. Devastated, he returned to his hometown of San Gimignano. There, due to the hardships he endured and the diminishing of his passion for art, which thrived in the inspiring atmosphere of Rome, he created a few pieces that I won’t mention in order to preserve the illustrious reputation he had rightfully earned in Rome. It's important to recognize that violence can derail even the most brilliant minds from their true purpose, pushing them onto a completely different path; this can also be seen in Vincenzio's associate, Schizzone, who created acclaimed works in the Borgo and the Campo Santo in Rome, as well as S. Stefano degl' Indiani, yet was also led astray by the reckless soldiers, which ultimately led to his early death. Vincenzio passed away in his hometown of San Gimignano, having experienced little joy in his life after leaving Rome.

MADONNA AND SAINTS, WITH A CHILD ANGEL
(After the painting by Timoteo da Urbino [Timoteo della Vite].
Milan: Brera, 508)
Brogi
View larger image
MADONNA AND SAINTS, WITH A CHILD ANGEL
(After the painting by Timoteo da Urbino [Timoteo della Vite].
Milan: Brera, 508)
Brogi
View larger image
Timoteo, a painter of Urbino, was the son of Bartolommeo della Vite, a citizen of good position, and Calliope, the daughter of Maestro Antonio Alberto of Ferrara, a passing good painter in his day, as is shown by his works at Urbino and elsewhere. While Timoteo was still a child, his father dying, he was left to the care of his mother Calliope, with good and happy augury, from the circumstance that Calliope is one of the Nine Muses, and the conformity that exists between poetry and painting. Then, after he had been brought discreetly through his boyhood by his wise mother, and initiated by her into the studies of the simpler arts and likewise of drawing, the young man came into his first knowledge of the world at the very time when the divine Raffaello Sanzio was flourishing. Applying himself in his earliest years to the goldsmith's art, he was summoned by Messer Pier Antonio, his elder brother, who was then studying at Bologna, to that most noble city, to the end that he might follow that art, to which he seemed to be inclined by nature, under the discipline of some good master. While living, then, in Bologna, in which city he stayed no little time, and was much honoured and received by the noble and magnificent Messer Francesco Gombruti into his house with every sort of courtesy, Timoteo associated continually with men of culture and lofty intellect. Wherefore, having become known in a few months as a young man of judgment, and inclined much more to the painter's than to the goldsmith's art, of which he had given proofs in some very well-executed portraits of his friends and of others, it seemed good to his brother, wishing to encourage the young man's natural genius, and also persuaded to this by his friends, to take him away from his files and chisels, and to make him devote himself entirely to the study of drawing. At which he was very content, and applied himself straightway to drawing and to the labours of art, copying and drawing all the best works in that city; and establishing a close intimacy with painters, he set out to such purpose on his new road, that it was a marvel to see the progress that he made from one day to another, and all the more because he learnt with facility the most difficult things without [Pg 14] any particular teaching from any appointed master. And so, becoming enamoured of his profession, and learning many secrets of painting merely by sometimes seeing certain painters of no account making their mixtures and using their brushes, and guided by himself and by the hand of nature, he set himself boldly to colouring, and acquired a very pleasing manner, very similar to that of the new Apelles, his compatriot, although he had seen nothing by his hand save a few works at Bologna. Thereupon, after executing some works on panel and on walls with very good results, guided by his own good intellect and judgment, and believing that in comparison with other painters he had succeeded very well in everything, he pursued the studies of painting with great ardour, and to such purpose, that in course of time he found that he had gained a firm footing in his art, and was held in good repute and vast expectation by all the world.
Timoteo, a painter from Urbino, was the son of Bartolommeo della Vite, a respected citizen, and Calliope, the daughter of Maestro Antonio Alberto from Ferrara, a decent painter in his own right, as evidenced by his works in Urbino and beyond. When Timoteo was still a child, his father passed away, leaving him in the care of his mother Calliope, which was seen as a positive sign since Calliope is one of the Nine Muses, and there's a natural link between poetry and painting. After being raised wisely by his mother and introduced to basic arts and drawing, Timoteo began to understand the world just as the great Raffaello Sanzio was making his mark. Initially, he focused on goldsmithing but was called by his older brother Messer Pier Antonio, who was studying in Bologna, to the prestigious city to pursue that art, which seemed to suit him. While living in Bologna for a considerable time, Timoteo was graciously welcomed into the home of the noble and generous Messer Francesco Gombruti, where he mingled with cultured and intelligent individuals. In just a few months, he gained a reputation as a young man with good judgment, leaning more towards painting than goldsmithing, which he demonstrated through some excellently executed portraits of friends and others. His brother, wanting to nurture Timoteo's natural talent and encouraged by friends, decided to pull him away from goldsmithing to dedicate himself entirely to drawing. Timoteo was pleased with this change and immediately immersed himself in drawing and artistic work, copying and sketching the finest pieces in the city, forming close relationships with painters. His rapid progress was impressive, especially considering he learned challenging techniques without formal instruction from a designated master. He became passionate about his craft and discovered many painting secrets just by observing some lesser-known painters mix their colors and handle brushes. Guided by his instincts and nature, he boldly began to color and developed a very appealing style that resembled that of the new Apelles, a fellow countryman, even though he had only seen a few of his works in Bologna. After successfully completing some panel and wall paintings with excellent results, guided by his own intellect and judgment, and believing he had done well compared to other painters, he pursued painting with intense passion. Over time, he established a solid foundation in his art and gained considerable reputation and high expectations from everyone.
Having then returned to his own country, now a man twenty-six years of age, he stayed there for some months, giving excellent proofs of his knowledge. Thus he executed, to begin with, the altar-piece of the Madonna for the altar of S. Croce in the Duomo, containing, besides the Virgin, S. Crescenzio and S. Vitale; and there is a little Angel seated on the ground, playing on a viola with a grace truly angelic and a childlike simplicity expressed with art and judgment. Afterwards he painted another altar-piece for the high-altar of the Church of the Trinità, together with a S. Apollonia on the left hand of that altar.
Having returned to his home country at the age of twenty-six, he spent several months there, showcasing his remarkable talent. To start, he created the altar piece of the Madonna for the altar of S. Croce in the Duomo, which features the Virgin, S. Crescenzio, and S. Vitale. There is also a small angel sitting on the ground, gracefully playing a viola with a truly angelic charm and a childlike simplicity captured beautifully. Later, he painted another altar piece for the high altar of the Church of the Trinità, along with a S. Apollonia on the left side of that altar.
By means of these works and certain others, of which there is no need to make mention, the name and fame of Timoteo spread abroad, and he was invited with great insistence by Raffaello to Rome; whither having gone with the greatest willingness, he was received with that loving kindness that was as peculiar to Raffaello as was his excellence in art. Working, then, with Raffaello, in little more than a year he made a great advance, not only in art, but also in prosperity, for in that time he sent home a good sum of money. While working with his master in the Church of S. Maria della Pace, he made with his own hand and invention the Sibyls that are in the lunettes on the right hand, so much esteemed by all painters. That they are his is maintained by some who [Pg 15] still remember having seen them painted; and we have also testimony in the cartoons which are still to be found in the possession of his successors. On his own account, likewise, he afterwards painted the bier and the dead body contained therein, with the other things, so highly extolled, that are around it, in the Scuola of S. Caterina da Siena; and although certain men of Siena, carried away by love of their own country, attribute these works to others, it may easily be recognized that they are the handiwork of Timoteo, both from the grace and sweetness of the colouring, and from other memorials of himself that he left in that most noble school of excellent painters.
Through these works and some others that don’t need mentioning, Timoteo’s name and fame spread widely, and Raffaello insisted on inviting him to Rome. Having gone there eagerly, he was welcomed with the warm kindness that was so typical of Raffaello, alongside his artistic excellence. While working with Raffaello, he made significant progress in just over a year, not only in art but also in his financial situation, as he managed to send home a good amount of money. While helping his master in the Church of S. Maria della Pace, he created the Sibyls in the lunettes on the right side, which are highly regarded by all painters. Some people who [Pg 15] still remember seeing them painted maintain that they are his work, and we also have evidence in the sketches that remain with his successors. Additionally, he later painted the bier and the deceased body it contained, along with other highly praised elements, in the Scuola of S. Caterina da Siena; and although some Sienese people, driven by their love for their hometown, attribute these works to others, it’s easy to identify them as Timoteo's handiwork, both from the grace and sweetness of the color and from other remnants of himself that he left in that most distinguished school of great painters.
Now, although Timoteo was well and honourably placed in Rome, yet, not being able to endure, as many do, the separation from his own country, and also being invited and urged every moment to come home by the counsels of his friends and by the prayers of his mother, now an old woman, he returned to Urbino, much to the displeasure of Raffaello, who loved him dearly for his good qualities. And not long after, having taken a wife in Urbino at the suggestion of his family, and having become enamoured of his country, in which he saw that he was highly honoured, besides the circumstance, even more important, that he had begun to have children, Timoteo made up his mind firmly never again to consent to go abroad, notwithstanding, as may still be seen from some letters, that he was invited back to Rome by Raffaello. But he did not therefore cease to work, and he made many works in Urbino and in the neighbouring cities. At Forlì he painted a chapel in company with Girolamo Genga, his friend and compatriot; and afterwards he painted entirely with his own hand a panel that was sent to Città di Castello, and likewise another for the people of Cagli. At Castel Durante, also, he executed some works in fresco, which are truly worthy of praise, as are all the other works by his hand, which bear witness that he was a graceful painter in figures, landscapes, and every other field of painting. In Urbino, at the instance of Bishop Arrivabene of Mantua, he painted the Chapel of S. Martino in the Duomo, in company with the same Genga; but the altar-panel and the middle of the chapel are entirely by the hand of Timoteo. For the same church, also, he painted a Magdalene standing, [Pg 16] clothed in a short mantle, and covered below this by her own tresses, which reach to the ground and are so beautiful and natural, that the wind appears to move them; not to mention the divine beauty of the expression of her countenance, which reveals clearly the love that she bore to her Master.
Now, even though Timoteo was well and respected in Rome, he couldn’t stand the separation from his home country like many others do. He was constantly encouraged and urged to return by his friends and by the prayers of his aging mother. So, he went back to Urbino, much to the disappointment of Raffaello, who cared for him deeply because of his good qualities. Shortly after, he got married in Urbino at his family's suggestion and fell in love with his homeland, where he felt highly regarded. More importantly, he was starting to have children, which made him determined never to leave home again, even though, as seen in some letters, Raffaello invited him back to Rome. However, he didn’t stop working and created many pieces in Urbino and nearby cities. In Forlì, he painted a chapel alongside his friend and fellow countryman Girolamo Genga. Later, he painted a panel entirely by himself that was sent to Città di Castello, as well as another for the people of Cagli. In Castel Durante, he also completed some fresco works that are truly commendable, as are all his other pieces that show he was a talented painter in figures, landscapes, and every aspect of painting. In Urbino, at the request of Bishop Arrivabene of Mantua, he painted the Chapel of S. Martino in the Duomo with the same Genga; however, the altar panel and the center of the chapel were solely done by Timoteo. For the same church, he also painted a standing Magdalene, clothed in a short mantle and with her long, beautiful hair flowing down to the ground, seemingly moved by the wind; not to mention the divine beauty of her expression that clearly reveals the love she had for her Master.
In S. Agata there is another panel by the hand of the same man, with some very good figures. And for S. Bernardino, without that city, he made that work so greatly renowned that is at the right hand upon the altar of the Buonaventuri, gentlemen of Urbino; wherein the Virgin is represented with most beautiful grace as having received the Annunciation, standing with her hands clasped and her face and eyes uplifted to Heaven. Above, in the sky, in the centre of a great circle of light, stands a little Child, with His foot on the Holy Spirit in the form of a Dove, and holding in His left hand a globe symbolizing the dominion of the world, while, with the other hand raised, He gives the benediction; and on the right of the Child is an angel, who is pointing Him out with his finger to the Madonna. Below—that is, on the level of the Madonna, to her right—is the Baptist, clothed in a camel's skin, which is torn on purpose that the nude figure may be seen; and on her left is a S. Sebastian, wholly naked, and bound in a beautiful attitude to a tree, and wrought with such diligence that the figure could not have stronger relief nor be in any part more beautiful.
In S. Agata, there's another panel created by the same artist, featuring some really impressive figures. For S. Bernardino, outside that city, he made a piece so famous that it’s on the right side of the altar of the Buonaventuri, gentlemen from Urbino; in which the Virgin is beautifully depicted as receiving the Annunciation, standing with her hands joined and her face and eyes lifted to Heaven. Above, in the sky, at the center of a large circle of light, stands a small Child, with His foot on the Holy Spirit represented as a Dove, holding a globe in His left hand symbolizing His reign over the world, while His raised right hand gives a blessing. On the right of the Child is an angel pointing Him out to the Madonna. Below—level with the Madonna, to her right—is the Baptist, dressed in a camel's skin that has been purposely torn so the nude figure can be seen; and on her left is S. Sebastian, completely naked and beautifully bound to a tree, crafted with such attention to detail that the figure has remarkable relief and beauty.
At the Court of the most illustrious Dukes of Urbino, in a little private study, may be seen an Apollo and two half-nude Muses by his hand, beautiful to a marvel. For the same patrons he executed many pictures, and made some decorations for apartments, which are very beautiful. And afterwards, in company with Genga, he painted some caparisons for horses, which were sent to the King of France, with such beautiful figures of various animals that they appeared to all who beheld them to have life and movement. He made, also, some triumphal arches similar to those of the ancients, on the occasion of the marriage of the most illustrious Duchess Leonora to the Lord Duke Francesco Maria, to whom they gave vast satisfaction, as they did to the whole Court; on which account he was received for many years into the household of that Duke, with an honourable salary.
At the court of the prominent Dukes of Urbino, in a small private study, you can see a stunning Apollo and two half-nude Muses created by his hand. For these same patrons, he produced many paintings and decorated some rooms, which are extremely beautiful. Later, alongside Genga, he painted some horse caparisons that were sent to the King of France, featuring such beautifully detailed animal figures that they seemed lifelike and full of movement. He also designed some triumphal arches similar to those from ancient times for the marriage of the esteemed Duchess Leonora to Duke Francesco Maria, which delighted them and the entire court; as a result, he was welcomed into the Duke's household for many years with a respectable salary.

THE MAGDALENE
(After the panel by Timoteo da Urbino [Timoteo della Vite].
Bologna: Accademia, 204)
Anderson
View larger image
THE MAGDALENE
(After the panel by Timoteo da Urbino [Timoteo della Vite].
Bologna: Accademia, 204)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 17] Timoteo was a bold draughtsman, and even more notable for the sweetness and charm of his colouring, insomuch that his works could not have been executed with more delicacy or greater diligence. He was a merry fellow, gay and festive by nature, and most acute and witty in his sayings and discourses. He delighted in playing every sort of instrument, and particularly the lyre, to which he sang, improvising upon it with extraordinary grace. He died in the year of our salvation 1524, the fifty-fourth of his life, leaving his native country as much enriched by his name and his fine qualities as it was grieved by his loss. He left in Urbino some unfinished works, which were finished afterwards by others and show by comparison how great were the worth and ability of Timoteo.
[Pg 17] Timoteo was a bold artist, and even more remarkable for the sweetness and charm of his color, such that his works couldn't have been created with more delicacy or care. He was a cheerful guy, naturally upbeat and lively, and sharp and witty in his remarks and conversations. He loved playing all kinds of instruments, especially the lyre, on which he sang, improvising with incredible grace. He passed away in the year 1524, at the age of fifty-four, leaving his home country as much enriched by his name and talents as it was saddened by his loss. He left some unfinished works in Urbino, which were completed by others and reveal just how great Timoteo's skill and worth were by comparison.
In our book are some drawings by his hand, very beautiful and truly worthy of praise, which I received from the most excellent and gentle Messer Giovanni Maria, his son—namely, a pen-sketch for the portrait of the Magnificent Giuliano de' Medici, which Timoteo made when Giuliano was frequenting the Court of Urbino and that most famous academy, a "Noli me tangere," and a S. John the Evangelist sleeping while Christ is praying in the Garden, all very beautiful.
In our book, there are some lovely drawings by him that are truly worthy of praise. I received them from the wonderful and kind Messer Giovanni Maria, his son. These include a pen sketch for the portrait of the Magnificent Giuliano de' Medici, which Timoteo created when Giuliano was often at the Court of Urbino and that famous academy, as well as a "Noli me tangere," and a depiction of Saint John the Evangelist sleeping while Christ prays in the Garden, all very beautiful.
[Pg 19] ANDREA DAL MONTE SANSOVINO
[Pg 21] LIFE OF ANDREA DAL MONTE SANSOVINO
[ANDREA CONTUCCI]
SCULPTOR AND ARCHITECT
Although Andrea, the son of Domenico Contucci of Monte Sansovino, was born from a poor father, a tiller of the earth, and rose from the condition of shepherd, nevertheless his conceptions were so lofty, his genius so rare, and his mind so ready, both in his works and in his discourses on the difficulties of architecture and perspective, that there was not in his day a better, rarer, or more subtle intellect than his, nor one that was more able than he was to render the greatest doubts clear and lucid; wherefore he well deserved to be held in his own times, by all who were qualified to judge, to be supreme in those professions. Andrea was born, so it is said, in the year 1460; and in his childhood, while looking after his flocks, he would draw on the sand the livelong day, as is also told of Giotto, and copy in clay some of the animals that he was guarding. So one day it happened that a Florentine citizen, who is said to have been Simone Vespucci, at that time Podestà of the Monte, passing by the place where Andrea was looking after his little charges, saw the boy standing all intent on drawing or modelling in clay. Whereupon he called to him, and, having seen what was the boy's bent, and heard whose son he was, he asked for him from Domenico Contucci, who graciously granted his request; and Simone promised to place him in the way of learning design, in order to see what virtue there might be in that inclination of nature, if assisted by continual study.
Although Andrea, the son of Domenico Contucci from Monte Sansovino, was born to a poor father who worked the land and started out as a shepherd, his ideas were very ambitious, his talent was exceptional, and his mind was so quick—both in his work and his discussions about the challenges of architecture and perspective—that there was no one in his time with a better, rarer, or more refined intellect. He was also more capable than anyone else of making the greatest doubts clear and understandable; therefore, he truly deserved to be considered the best in his field by those who were able to judge. Andrea was supposedly born in 1460; as a child, while taking care of his flock, he would spend the entire day drawing in the sand, much like Giotto, and sculpting the animals he was watching over from clay. One day, a Florentine citizen, believed to be Simone Vespucci, who was then the Podestà of the Monte, happened to pass by where Andrea was tending his sheep and saw the boy deeply engaged in drawing or shaping models in clay. He called out to him, and after noticing the boy's talents and hearing who his father was, he asked Domenico Contucci for Andrea's permission to mentor him. Domenico graciously accepted, and Simone promised to help him pursue his interest in design to see what potential his natural talent might hold if nurtured through constant study.
Having returned to Florence, then, Simone placed him to learn art with Antonio del Pollaiuolo, under whom Andrea made such proficience, that in a few years he became a very good master. In the house of that [Pg 22] Simone, on the Ponte Vecchio, there may still be seen a cartoon executed by him at that time, of Christ being scourged at the Column, drawn with much diligence; and, in addition, two marvellous heads in terra-cotta, copied from ancient medals, one of the Emperor Nero, and the other of the Emperor Galba, which heads served to adorn a chimney-piece; but the Galba is now at Arezzo, in the house of Giorgio Vasari. Afterwards, while still living in Florence, he made an altar-piece in terra-cotta for the Church of S. Agata at Monte Sansovino, with a S. Laurence and some other saints, and little scenes most beautifully executed. And no long time after this he made another like it, containing a very beautiful Assumption of Our Lady, S. Agata, S. Lucia, and S. Romualdo; which altar-piece was afterwards glazed by the Della Robbia family.
Having returned to Florence, Simone had him study art with Antonio del Pollaiuolo, under whom Andrea advanced so much that in just a few years he became a skilled master. In the house of that [Pg 22] Simone, on the Ponte Vecchio, there’s still a cartoon he created at that time, depicting Christ being scourged at the Column, drawn with great care; and in addition, there are two remarkable terra-cotta heads he made, based on ancient coins, one of Emperor Nero and the other of Emperor Galba, which were used to decorate a fireplace; however, the Galba head is now in Arezzo, at Giorgio Vasari's house. Later, while still living in Florence, he created a terra-cotta altar piece for the Church of S. Agata at Monte Sansovino, featuring St. Lawrence and some other saints, along with beautifully executed little scenes. Not long after that, he made another similar piece, showcasing a stunning Assumption of Our Lady, St. Agata, St. Lucia, and St. Romualdo; this altar piece was later glazed by the Della Robbia family.

ALTARPIECE
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Florence: S.
Spirito)
Alinari
View larger image
ALTARPIECE
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Florence: S.
Spirito)
Alinari
View larger image
Then, pursuing the art of sculpture, he made in his youth for Simone del Pollaiuolo, otherwise called Il Cronaca, two capitals for pilasters in the Sacristy of S. Spirito, which brought him very great fame, and led to his receiving a commission to execute the antechamber that is between the said sacristy and the church; and since the space was very small, Andrea was forced to use great ingenuity. He made, therefore, a structure of grey-stone in the Corinthian Order, with twelve round columns, six on either side; and having laid architrave, frieze, and cornice over these columns, he then raised a barrel-shaped vault, all of the same stone, with a coffer-work surface full of carvings, which was something novel, rich and varied, and much extolled. It is true, indeed, that if the mouldings of that coffer-work ceiling, which serve to divide the square and round panels by which it is adorned, had been contrived so as to fall in a straight line with the columns, with truer proportion and harmony, this work would be wholly perfect in every part; and it would have been an easy thing to do this. But, according to what I once heard from certain old friends of Andrea, he used to defend himself by saying that he had adhered in his vault to the method of the coffering in the Ritonda at Rome, wherein the ribs that radiate from the round window in the centre above, from which that temple gets its light, serve to enclose the square sunk panels containing the rosettes, which diminish little by little, as likewise do the ribs; and for that reason they do not [Pg 23] fall in a straight line with the columns. Andrea used to add that if he who built the Temple of the Ritonda, which is the best designed and proportioned that there is, and made with more harmony than any other, paid no attention to this in a vault of such size and importance, much less should he do so in a coffered ceiling with far smaller panels. Nevertheless many craftsmen, and Michelagnolo in particular, have been of the opinion that the Ritonda was built by three architects, of whom the first carried it as far as the cornice that is above the columns, and the second from the cornice upwards, the part, namely, that contains those windows of more graceful workmanship, for in truth this second part is very different in manner from the part below, since the vaulting was carried out without any relation between the coffering and the straight lines of what is below. The third is believed to have made the portico, which was a very rare work. And for these reasons the masters who practise this art at the present day should not fall into such an error and then make excuses, as did Andrea.
Then, while pursuing the art of sculpture, he created two capitals for pilasters in the Sacristy of S. Spirito for Simone del Pollaiuolo, also known as Il Cronaca, which brought him significant fame and led to a commission to design the antechamber between the sacristy and the church. Since the space was very small, Andrea had to be quite clever. He built a structure of grey stone in the Corinthian Order, featuring twelve round columns, six on each side. After placing the architrave, frieze, and cornice over the columns, he then constructed a barrel-shaped vault, all made from the same stone, with a coffered surface full of carvings that were innovative, rich, and varied, earning much praise. However, it is true that if the moldings of that coffered ceiling, which separate the square and round panels it is adorned with, had been designed to align straight with the columns, with better proportion and harmony, this work would be completely perfect in every aspect; achieving this would have been relatively easy. But, as I once heard from some of Andrea's old friends, he used to justify himself by saying that he had followed the method of coffering in the Pantheon in Rome, where the ribs that radiate from the round window in the center—which provides light to that temple—enclose the square sunk panels containing the rosettes, which get smaller gradually, just like the ribs; and for that reason, they do not align perfectly with the columns. Andrea also claimed that if the architect who built the Pantheon, which is the best designed and proportioned building there is and done with more harmony than others, didn’t concern himself with this in such a large and significant vault, then he certainly should not worry about it in a coffered ceiling with much smaller panels. Nevertheless, many craftsmen, and particularly Michelangelo, have believed that the Pantheon was built by three architects, with the first taking it up to the cornice above the columns, the second from the cornice upwards, specifically the part that contains those windows with more elegant craftsmanship, as this second part differs greatly in style from what is below since the vaulting was done without any relationship between the coffering and the straight lines below. The third is thought to have designed the portico, which is a very unique work. For these reasons, current masters practicing this art should not make such mistakes and then justify themselves as Andrea did.
After that work, having received from the family of the Corbinelli the commission for the Chapel of the Sacrament in the same church, he carried it out with much diligence, imitating in the low-reliefs Donato and other excellent craftsmen, and sparing no labour in his desire to do himself credit, as, indeed, he did. In two niches, one on either side of a very beautiful tabernacle, he placed two saints somewhat more than one braccio in height, S. James and S. Matthew, executed with such spirit and excellence, that every sort of merit is revealed in them and not one fault. Equally good, also, are two Angels in the round that are the crowning glory of this work, with the most beautiful draperies—for they are in the act of flying—that are anywhere to be seen; and in the centre is a little naked Christ full of grace. There are also some scenes with little figures in the predella and over the tabernacle, all so well executed that the point of a brush could scarcely do what Andrea did with his chisel. But whosoever wishes to be amazed by the diligence of this extraordinary man should look at the architecture of this work as a whole, for it is so well executed and joined together in its small proportions that it appears to have been chiselled out of one single stone. [Pg 24] Much extolled, also, is a large Pietà of marble that he made in half-relief on the front of the altar, with the Madonna and S. John weeping. Nor could one imagine any more beautiful pieces of casting than are the bronze gratings that enclose that chapel, with their ornaments of marble, and with stags, the device, or rather the arms, of the Corbinelli, which serve as adornments for the bronze candelabra. In short, this work was executed without any sparing of labour, and with all the best considerations that could possibly be imagined.
After that project, having received a commission from the Corbinelli family for the Chapel of the Sacrament in the same church, he worked on it with great care, imitating Donato and other skilled craftsmen, and put in a lot of effort to make sure he did a great job, which he certainly did. In two niches, one on either side of a stunning tabernacle, he placed two saints just over one braccio tall, S. James and S. Matthew, crafted with such energy and quality that every kind of skill shines through, and there’s not a single flaw. Equally impressive are two round Angels that are the highlight of this work, with the most beautiful drapery—as they are depicted in flight—that you can find anywhere; and in the center is a small, graceful nude Christ. There are also scenes with tiny figures in the predella and above the tabernacle, all done so well that a paintbrush couldn’t achieve what Andrea accomplished with his chisel. But anyone who wants to be impressed by the dedication of this remarkable man should look at the overall architecture of this work, as it’s so finely crafted and seamlessly put together in its small scale that it seems to have been carved from a single block of stone. [Pg 24] Also highly praised is a large marble Pietà that he made in half-relief on the front of the altar, featuring the Madonna and S. John in tears. Nor could anyone imagine more beautiful cast pieces than the bronze grilles that enclose that chapel, adorned with marble decorations and stags—the device, or rather, the coat of arms of the Corbinelli—which also beautify the bronze candelabra. In short, this work was executed with immense effort and with all the best intentions imaginable.
By these and by other works the name of Andrea spread far and wide, and he was sought for from the elder Lorenzo de' Medici, the Magnificent, in whose garden, as has been related, he had pursued the studies of design, by the King of Portugal; and, being therefore sent to him by Lorenzo, he executed for that King many works of sculpture and of architecture, and in particular a very beautiful palace with four towers, and many other buildings. Part of the palace was painted after designs and cartoons by the hand of Andrea, who drew very well, as may be seen from some drawings by his own hand in our book, finished with a charcoal-point, and some other architectural drawings, showing excellent design. He also made for that King a carved altar of wood, containing some Prophets; and likewise a very beautiful battle-piece in clay, to be afterwards carved in marble, representing the wars that the King waged with the Moors, who were vanquished by him; and no work by the hand of Andrea was ever seen that was more spirited or more terrible than this, what with the movements and various attitudes of the horses, the heaps of dead, and the vehement fury of the soldiers in combat. And he made a figure of S. Mark in marble, which was a very rare work. While in the service of that King, Andrea also gave his attention to some difficult and fantastic architectural works, according to the custom of that country, in order to please the King; of which things I once saw a book at Monte Sansovino in the possession of his heirs, which is now in the hands of Maestro Girolamo Lombardo, who was his disciple, and to whom it fell, as will be related, to finish some works begun by Andrea.
Through these and other works, the name of Andrea became well-known, and he was sought after by the elder Lorenzo de' Medici, the Magnificent. In his garden, as mentioned, Andrea studied design, and he was then requested by the King of Portugal. Lorenzo sent him to the King, where he created numerous sculptures and architectural projects, notably a stunning palace with four towers and various other buildings. Part of the palace was painted based on designs and sketches by Andrea, who was a talented draftsman, as shown in some of his drawings in our book, completed with charcoal and other architectural designs demonstrating excellent creativity. He also crafted a wooden altar carved with figures of some Prophets for the King, and created a remarkable clay battle scene, intended to be carved in marble, depicting the wars the King fought against the Moors, whom he defeated; no work by Andrea was ever seen that was more dynamic or intense than this, with the movements and different poses of the horses, the piles of dead, and the fierce rage of the soldiers in battle. He also sculpted a marble figure of St. Mark, which was an extraordinary piece. While serving the King, Andrea also tackled some challenging and imaginative architectural works in line with the customs of that region to please the King. I once saw a book about these works at Monte Sansovino, owned by his heirs, which is now with Maestro Girolamo Lombardo, who was his disciple and took over some projects that Andrea had started, as will be detailed later.

TOMB OF CARDINAL ASCANIO SFORZA
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Rome: S. Maria
del Popolo)
Alinari
View larger image
TOMB OF CARDINAL ASCANIO SFORZA
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Rome: S. Maria
del Popolo)
Alinari
View larger image
Having been nine years in Portugal, and growing weary of that service, and desirous of seeing his relatives and friends in Tuscany again, [Pg 25] Andrea determined, now that he had put together a good sum of money, to obtain leave from the King and return home. And so, having been granted permission, although not willingly, he returned to Florence, leaving behind him one who should complete such of his works as remained unfinished. After arriving in Florence, he began in the year 1500 a marble group of S. John baptizing Christ, which was to be placed over that door of the Temple of S. Giovanni that faces the Misericordia; but he did not finish it, because he was almost forced to go to Genoa, where he made two figures of marble, Christ, or rather S. John, and a Madonna, which are truly worthy of the highest praise. And those at Florence remained unfinished, and are still to be found at the present day in the Office of Works of the said S. Giovanni.
After spending nine years in Portugal and getting tired of that job, Andrea wanted to see his family and friends in Tuscany again. [Pg 25] He decided that since he had saved up a good amount of money, it was time to ask the King for permission to go back home. After getting a reluctant approval, he returned to Florence, leaving someone behind to finish the works he hadn’t completed. Once in Florence, he started in 1500 on a marble sculpture of St. John baptizing Christ, meant to be placed over the door of the Temple of St. Giovanni facing the Misericordia; however, he didn’t finish it because he was nearly compelled to go to Genoa, where he created two marble figures, one of Christ, or rather St. John, and a Madonna, which are both truly deserving of high praise. The works he left in Florence remain unfinished and can still be found today in the Office of Works of St. Giovanni.
He was then summoned to Rome by Pope Julius II, and received the commission for two tombs of marble, which were erected in S. Maria del Popolo—one for Cardinal Ascanio Sforza, and the other for the Cardinal of Recanati, a very near relative of the Pope—and these works were wrought so perfectly by Andrea that nothing more could be desired, since they were so well executed and finished, and with such purity, beauty, and grace, that they reveal the true consideration and proportion of art. There may be seen there, also, a Temperance with an hourglass in her hand, which is held to be a thing divine; and, indeed, it does not appear to be a modern work, but ancient and wholly perfect. And although there are other figures there similar to it, yet on account of its attitude and grace it is much the best; not to mention that nothing could be more pleasing and beautiful than the veil that she has around her, which is executed with such delicacy that it is a miracle to behold.
He was then called to Rome by Pope Julius II and received the commission for two marble tombs, which were set up in S. Maria del Popolo—one for Cardinal Ascanio Sforza and the other for the Cardinal of Recanati, a very close relative of the Pope. These works were crafted so perfectly by Andrea that nothing more could be desired, as they were exceptionally well executed and finished, and with such purity, beauty, and grace that they truly reflect the true value and proportion of art. You can also see there a Temperance figure holding an hourglass, which is considered divine; indeed, it doesn’t look like a modern work, but rather ancient and completely flawless. Although there are other similar figures there, due to its pose and elegance, it stands out the most; not to mention, nothing could be more pleasing and beautiful than the veil draped over her, which is rendered with such delicacy that it’s a marvel to behold.
In S. Agostino at Rome, on a pilaster in the middle of the church, he made in marble a S. Anne embracing a Madonna with the Child, a little less than lifesize. This work may be counted as one of the best of modern times, since, even as a lively and wholly natural gladness is seen in the old woman, and a divine beauty in the Madonna, so the figure of the Infant Christ is so well wrought, that no other was ever executed with such delicacy and perfection. Wherefore it well deserved that for many years a succession of sonnets and various other learned compositions [Pg 26] should be attached to it, of which the friars of that place have a book full, which I myself have seen, to my no little marvel. And in truth the world was right in doing this, for the reason that the work can never be praised enough.
In S. Agostino in Rome, on a column in the middle of the church, he created a marble statue of St. Anne holding the Madonna with the Child, just under lifesize. This piece can be considered one of the best of modern times, as the old woman displays a lively and completely natural joy, while the Madonna embodies divine beauty. The figure of the Infant Christ is crafted with such delicacy and perfection that no other has ever been made like it. Therefore, it deserved that for many years a series of sonnets and various other scholarly works [Pg 26] should be associated with it, which the friars there have compiled into a book that I have seen myself, much to my amazement. Truly, the world was justified in doing this, as the work can never receive enough praise.

THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. ANNE
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Rome: S.
Agostino)
Alinari
View larger image
THE MADONNA AND CHILD WITH S. ANNE
(After Andrea dal Monte Sansovino [Andrea Contucci].
Rome: S. Agostino)
Alinari
View larger image
The fame of Andrea having thereby grown greater, Leo X, who had resolved that the adornment with wrought marble of the Chamber of the Madonna in S. Maria at Loreto should be carried out, according to the beginning made by Bramante, ordained that Andrea should bring that work to completion. The ornamentation of that Chamber, which Bramante had begun, had at the corners four double projections, which, adorned by pillars with bases and carved capitals, rested on a socle rich with carvings, and two braccia and a half in height; over which socle, between the two aforesaid pillars, he had made a large niche to contain seated figures, and, above each of these niches, a smaller one, which, reaching to the collarino of the capitals of those pillars, left a frieze of the same height as the capitals. Above these were afterwards laid architrave, frieze, and richly carved cornice, which, going right round all the four walls, project over the four corners; and in the middle of each of the larger walls—for the Chamber is greater in length than in breadth—were left two spaces, since there was the same projection in the centre of those walls as there was at the corners; whence the larger niche below, with the smaller one above it, came to be enclosed by a space of five braccia on either side. In this space were two doors, one on either side, through which one entered into the chapel; and above the doors was a space of five braccia between one niche and another, wherein were to be carved scenes in marble. The front wall was the same, but without niches in the centre, and the height of the socle, with the projection, formed an altar, which was set off by the pillars and the niches at the corners. In the same front wall, in the centre, was a space of the same breadth as the spaces at the sides, to contain some scenes in the upper part, while below, the same in height as the spaces of the sides, but beginning immediately above the altar, was a bronze grating opposite to the inner altar, through which it was possible to hear the Mass and to see the inside of the Chamber and the aforesaid altar of the Madonna. [Pg 27] Altogether, then, the spaces and compartments for the scenes were seven: one in front, above the grating, two on each of the longer sides, and two on the upper part—that is to say, behind the altar of the Madonna; and, in addition, there were eight large and eight small niches, with other smaller spaces for the arms and devices of the Pope and of the Church.
The fame of Andrea grew even more, and Leo X, who had decided that the decoration of the Chamber of the Madonna in S. Maria at Loreto should be completed according to what Bramante started, ordered Andrea to finish that work. The decoration of that Chamber, which Bramante had begun, featured four double projections at the corners, decorated with pillars that had bases and carved capitals, resting on a socle rich with carvings and standing two and a half braccia high. Above that socle, between the two pillars, he created a large niche to hold seated figures, and above each of these niches was a smaller one that reached up to the collar of the capitals of those pillars, leaving a frieze that matched the height of the capitals. Above these were later added an architrave, frieze, and richly carved cornice, which went all around the four walls and projected over the four corners. In the middle of each of the larger walls—since the Chamber is longer than it is wide—two spaces were left, similar to the corner projections; thus, the larger niche below and the smaller one above were enclosed by a five-braccia space on each side. In that space were two doors, one on each side, leading into the chapel, and above the doors was a five-braccia space between the niches, which was meant for carved scenes in marble. The front wall had the same features but lacked niches in the center, and the height of the socle with the projection formed an altar, which was enhanced by the pillars and the corner niches. In the same front wall, in the center, there was a space the same width as the side spaces, meant to contain scenes in the upper part, while below it, at the same height as the side spaces but starting just above the altar, there was a bronze grating opposite the inner altar, allowing one to hear the Mass and see the inside of the Chamber and the altar of the Madonna. [Pg 27] In total, there were seven spaces and compartments for scenes: one in front above the grating, two on each of the longer sides, and two above—that is, behind the altar of the Madonna; additionally, there were eight large and eight small niches, along with other smaller spaces for the coats of arms and insignias of the Pope and the Church.
Andrea, then, having found the work in this condition, distributed over these spaces, with a rich and beautiful arrangement, scenes from the life of the Madonna. In one of the two side-walls, he began in one part the Nativity of the Madonna, and executed half of it; and it was completely finished afterwards by Baccio Bandinelli. In the other part he began the Marriage of the Virgin, but this also remained unfinished, and after the death of Andrea it was completed as we see it by Raffaello da Montelupo. On the front wall he arranged that there should be made, in two small squares which are on either side of the bronze grating, in one the Visitation and in the other the scene of the Virgin and Joseph going to have themselves enrolled for taxes; which scenes were afterwards executed by Francesco da San Gallo, then a young man. Then, in that part where the greatest space is, Andrea made the Angel Gabriel bringing the Annunciation to the Virgin—which happened in that very chamber which these marbles enclose—with such grace and beauty that there is nothing better to be seen, for he made the Virgin wholly intent on that Salutation, and the Angel, kneeling, appears to be not of marble, but truly celestial, with "Ave Maria" issuing from his mouth. In company with Gabriel are two other Angels, in full-relief and detached from the marble, one of whom is walking after him and the other appears to be flying. Behind a building stand two other Angels, carved out by the chisel in such a way that they seem to be alive. In the air, on a cloud much undercut—nay, almost entirely detached from the marble—are many little boys upholding a God the Father, who is sending down the Holy Spirit by means of a ray of marble, which, descending from Him completely detached, appears quite real; as, likewise, is the Dove upon it, which represents the Holy Spirit. Nor can one describe how great is the beauty and how delicate the carving of a vase filled with flowers, [Pg 28] which was made in this work by the gracious hand of Andrea, who lavished so much excellence on the plumes of the Angels, the hair, the grace of their features and draperies, and, in short, on every other thing, that this divine work cannot be extolled enough. And, in truth, that most holy place, which was the very house and habitation of the Mother of the Son of God, could not obtain from the resources of the world a greater, richer, or more beautiful adornment than that which it received from the architecture of Bramante and the sculpture of Andrea Sansovino; although, even if it were entirely of the most precious gems of the East, it would be little more than nothing in comparison with such merits.
Andrea, having discovered the project in this state, spread out beautiful scenes from the life of the Madonna across these spaces. On one of the two side walls, he started with the Nativity of the Madonna and completed half of it; the rest was finished later by Baccio Bandinelli. On the other side, he began the Marriage of the Virgin, which also remained unfinished, and after Andrea's death, Raffaello da Montelupo completed it as we see it today. On the front wall, he arranged to have two small squares on either side of the bronze grating, with one depicting the Visitation and the other showing the Virgin and Joseph going to register for taxes; these were later executed by Francesco da San Gallo, who was still a young man at the time. In the larger area, Andrea created the Angel Gabriel delivering the Annunciation to the Virgin, which took place in the very room enclosed by these marbles, with such grace and beauty that nothing could surpass it. He portrayed the Virgin completely focused on the message, while the Angel, kneeling, appears not to be made of marble but truly celestial, with "Ave Maria" coming from his lips. Accompanying Gabriel are two other Angels, fully carved and detached from the marble; one appears to be walking behind him, and the other seems to be flying. Behind a building, two other Angels are carved in such a way that they seem alive. In the air, on a cloud that is deeply undercut—almost entirely detached from the marble—are many little boys supporting God the Father, who sends down the Holy Spirit through a marble ray that appears completely real as it descends from Him; likewise, the Dove representing the Holy Spirit also looks authentic. The beauty and delicate craftsmanship of a vase filled with flowers, [Pg 28], is beyond description, made by the skilled hand of Andrea, who poured immense talent into the Angels' plumes, their hair, the grace of their features and draperies, and, in fact, into every detail, making this divine work worthy of endless praise. Truly, that most holy place, the very home of the Mother of the Son of God, could not have received a greater, richer, or more beautiful adornment than what was provided by Bramante's architecture and Andrea Sansovino's sculpture; even if it were completely adorned with the most precious gems from the East, it would still be insignificant compared to such merits.
Andrea spent an almost incredible amount of time over this work, and therefore had no time to finish the others that he had begun; for, in addition to those mentioned above, he began in a space on one of the side-walls the Nativity of Jesus Christ, with the Shepherds and four Angels singing; and all these he finished so well that they seem to be wholly alive. But the story of the Magi, which he began above that one, was afterwards finished by Girolamo Lombardo, his disciple, and by others. On the back wall he arranged that two large scenes should be made, one above the other; in one, the Death of Our Lady, with the Apostles bearing her to her burial, four Angels in the air, and many Jews seeking to steal that most holy corpse; and this was finished after Andrea's lifetime by the sculptor Bologna. Below this one, then, he arranged that there should be made a scene of the Miracle of Loreto, showing in what manner that chapel, which was the Chamber of Our Lady, wherein she was born, brought up, and saluted by the Angel, and in which she reared her Son up to the age of twelve and lived ever after His Death, was finally carried by the Angels, first into Sclavonia, afterwards to a forest in the territory of Recanati, and in the end to the place where it is now held in such veneration and continually visited in solemn throng by all the Christian people. This scene, I say, was executed in marble on that wall, according to the arrangement made by Andrea, by the Florentine sculptor Tribolo, as will be related in due place. Andrea likewise blocked out the Prophets for the niches, but did not finish them completely, save one alone, and the others were afterwards finished by [Pg 29] the aforesaid Girolamo Lombardo and by other sculptors, as will be seen in the Lives that are to follow. But with regard to all the works wrought by Andrea in this undertaking, they are the most beautiful and best executed works of sculpture that had ever been made up to that time.
Andrea spent an incredible amount of time on this work, which meant he didn’t have time to finish the other projects he had started. In addition to those already mentioned, he began a Nativity of Jesus Christ on one of the side walls, featuring the Shepherds and four Angels singing. He completed this so well that it seems almost alive. However, the story of the Magi, which he started above that scene, was later finished by his disciple Girolamo Lombardo and others. On the back wall, he planned for two large scenes to be created, one above the other. The first depicts the Death of Our Lady, with the Apostles carrying her to her burial, four Angels in the air, and many Jews attempting to steal that most holy body; this was finished after Andrea's lifetime by the sculptor Bologna. Below that, he arranged for a scene of the Miracle of Loreto, showing how the chapel—where Our Lady was born, raised, greeted by the Angel, and where she raised her Son until he was twelve—was ultimately carried by Angels, first to Sclavonia, then to a forest in the territory of Recanati, and finally to its current location, which is held in great veneration and continually visited by all Christian people. This scene was executed in marble on that wall, according to Andrea’s layout, by the Florentine sculptor Tribolo, as will be detailed later. Andrea also outlined the Prophets for the niches but didn’t finish them completely, except for one, while the others were later completed by Girolamo Lombardo and other sculptors, as will be noted in the upcoming Lives. Overall, the works created by Andrea in this project are the most beautiful and best-executed sculptures ever made up to that time.
In like manner, the Palace of the Canons of the same church was also carried on by Andrea, after the arrangements made by Bramante at the commission of Pope Leo. But this, also, remained unfinished after the death of Andrea, and the building was continued under Clement VII by Antonio da San Gallo, and then by the architect Giovanni Boccalino, under the patronage of the very reverend Cardinal da Carpi, up to the year 1563. While Andrea was at work on the aforesaid Chapel of the Virgin, there were built the fortifications of Loreto and other works, which were highly extolled by the all-conquering Signor Giovanni de' Medici, with whom Andrea had a very strait friendship, having become first acquainted with him in Rome.
Similarly, the Palace of the Canons of the same church was also built by Andrea, following the plans made by Bramante at the request of Pope Leo. However, this too was left unfinished after Andrea's death, and the construction was continued under Clement VII by Antonio da San Gallo, and then by the architect Giovanni Boccalino, with the support of the very reverend Cardinal da Carpi, until the year 1563. While Andrea was working on the aforementioned Chapel of the Virgin, the fortifications of Loreto and other projects were completed, which received high praise from the renowned Signor Giovanni de' Medici, with whom Andrea shared a close friendship, having first met him in Rome.
Having four months of holiday in the year for repose while he was working at Loreto, he used to spend that time in agriculture at his native place of Monte Sansovino, enjoying meanwhile a most tranquil rest with his relatives and friends. Living thus at the Monte during the summer, he built there a commodious house for himself and bought much property; and for the Friars of S. Agostino in that place he had a cloister made, which, although small, is very well designed, but also out of the square, since those Fathers insisted on having it built over the old walls. Andrea, however, made the interior rectangular by increasing the thickness of the pilasters at the corners, in order to change it from an ill-proportioned structure into one with good and true measurements. He designed, also, for a Company that had its seat in that cloister, under the title of S. Antonio, a very beautiful door of the Doric Order; and likewise the tramezzo[3] and pulpit of the Church of S. Agostino. He also caused a little chapel to be built for the friars half-way down the hill on the descent to the fountain, without the door that leads to the old Pieve, although they had no wish for it. He made the design for the house of Messer Pietro, a most skilful astrologer, at [Pg 30] Arezzo; and a large figure of terra-cotta for Montepulciano, of King Porsena, which was a rare work, although I have never seen it again since the first time, so that I fear that it may have come to an evil end. And for a German priest, who was his friend, he made a lifesize S. Rocco of terra-cotta, very beautiful; which priest had it placed in the Church of Battifolle, in the district of Arezzo. This was the last piece of sculpture that Andrea executed.
Having four months of holiday each year while working at Loreto, he spent that time farming in his hometown of Monte Sansovino, enjoying a peaceful rest with family and friends. During the summer in Monte, he built a spacious house for himself and purchased a lot of land. He also had a small but well-designed cloister built for the Friars of S. Agostino, though it was slightly out of square because the Fathers wanted it constructed over the old walls. However, Andrea made the interior rectangular by thickening the corner pilasters to transform it from a poorly proportioned structure into one with proper dimensions. He also designed a beautiful Doric door for a Company based in that cloister under the title of S. Antonio, as well as the tramezzo[3] and pulpit of the Church of S. Agostino. He commissioned a small chapel for the friars halfway down the hill on the way to the fountain, near the door leading to the old Pieve, even though they didn't want it. He created the design for Messer Pietro's house, a skilled astrologer, in [Pg 30] Arezzo; and a large terra-cotta figure of King Porsena for Montepulciano, which was quite special, although I've never seen it again since the first time, making me worry that it may have been destroyed. For a German priest, who was his friend, he made a lifesize terra-cotta figure of S. Rocco, which was very beautiful; that priest had it placed in the Church of Battifolle in the Arezzo area. This was the last sculpture that Andrea created.
He gave the design, also, for the steps ascending to the Vescovado of Arezzo; and for the Madonna delle Lagrime, in the same city, he made the design of a very beautiful ornament that was to be executed in marble, with four figures, each four braccia high; but this work was carried no farther, on account of the death of our Andrea. For he, having reached the age of sixty-eight, and being a man who would never stay idle, set to work to move some stakes from one place to another at his villa, whereby he caught a chill; and in a few days, worn out by a continuous fever, he died, in the year 1529.
He also designed the steps leading up to the Vescovado of Arezzo; and for the Madonna delle Lagrime in the same city, he created a beautiful ornament that was supposed to be made in marble, featuring four figures, each four braccia tall. However, this work was never completed because of our Andrea's death. He had reached the age of sixty-eight, and being someone who could never stay idle, he started moving some stakes around at his villa, which led him to catch a chill. Just a few days later, worn out by a persistent fever, he died in 1529.
The death of Andrea grieved his native place by reason of the honour that he had brought it, and his sons and the women of his household, who lost both their dearest one and their support. And not long ago Muzio Camillo, one of the three aforesaid sons, who was displaying a most beautiful intellect in the studies of learning and letters, followed him, to the great loss of his family and displeasure of his friends.
The death of Andrea saddened his hometown because of the honor he had brought it, and his sons and the women in his household, who lost both their beloved family member and their provider. Not long ago, Muzio Camillo, one of his three mentioned sons, who was showing remarkable talent in his studies, passed away as well, causing great sorrow for his family and disappointment for his friends.
Andrea, in addition to his profession of art, was truly a person of much distinction, for he was wise in his discourse, and reasoned most beautifully on every subject. He was prudent and regular in his every action, much the friend of learned men, and a philosopher of great natural gifts. He gave much attention to the study of cosmography, and left to his family a number of drawings and writings on the subject of distances and measurements. He was somewhat small in stature, but robust and beautifully made. His hair was soft and long, his eyes light in colour, his nose aquiline, and his skin pink and white; but he had a slight impediment in his speech.
Andrea, besides being an artist, was truly a distinguished person. He was wise in his conversations and articulately reasoned on every topic. He was careful and orderly in all his actions, a close friend to intellectuals, and a philosopher with great natural talents. He devoted a lot of time to studying cosmography and left his family many drawings and writings on distances and measurements. He was slightly short but well-built and handsome. His hair was soft and long, his eyes were light-colored, he had a prominent nose, and his skin was fair; however, he had a slight speech impediment.
His disciples were the aforesaid Girolamo Lombardo, the Florentine Simone Cioli, Domenico dal Monte Sansovino (who died soon after him), [Pg 31] and the Florentine Leonardo del Tasso, who made the S. Sebastian of wood over his own tomb in S. Ambrogio at Florence, and the marble panel of the Nuns of S. Chiara. A disciple of Andrea, likewise, was the Florentine Jacopo Sansovino—so called after his master—of whom there will be a long account in the proper place.
His disciples were Girolamo Lombardo, the Florentine Simone Cioli, Domenico dal Monte Sansovino (who passed away shortly after him), [Pg 31] and the Florentine Leonardo del Tasso, who created the wood statue of S. Sebastian over his own tomb in S. Ambrogio in Florence, as well as the marble panel for the Nuns of S. Chiara. Another disciple of Andrea was the Florentine Jacopo Sansovino—named after his mentor—who will be discussed in detail later.
Architecture and sculpture, then, are much indebted to Andrea, in that he enriched the one with many rules of measurement and devices for drawing weights, and with a degree of diligence that had not been employed before, and in the other he brought his marble to perfection with marvellous judgment, care, and mastery.
Architecture and sculpture owe a lot to Andrea because he enhanced architecture with numerous measurement rules and techniques for balancing weight, applying a level of diligence that hadn’t been used before. In sculpture, he perfected his marble work with remarkable judgment, care, and skill.
[Pg 33] BENEDETTO DA ROVEZZANO
[Pg 35] LIFE OF BENEDETTO DA ROVEZZANO
SCULPTOR
Great, I think, must be the displeasure of those who, having executed some work of genius, yet, when they hope to enjoy the fruits of this in their old age, and to see the beautiful results achieved by other intellects in works similar to their own, and to be able to perceive what perfection there may be in that field of art that they themselves have practised, find themselves robbed by adverse fortune, by time, by a bad habit of body, or by some other cause, of the sight of their eyes; whence they are not able, as they were before, to perceive either the deficiencies or the perfection of men whom they hear of as living and practising their own professions. And even more are they grieved to hear the praises of the new masters, not through envy, but because they are not able to judge, like others, whether that fame be well-deserved or not.
Great, I think, must be the disappointment of those who, after creating a remarkable work, hope to enjoy the rewards of their efforts in their old age and to appreciate the beautiful achievements of others in similar fields. They want to recognize the level of perfection that exists in the art they themselves practiced. Instead, they find themselves deprived by bad luck, age, health problems, or some other reason, of the ability to see; thus, they can no longer perceive the flaws or excellence of those they hear about who are still actively working in their professions. Even more heartbreaking is to hear the praises of the new masters, not out of jealousy, but because they can’t judge like others whether that recognition is truly deserved or not.
This misfortune happened to Benedetto da Rovezzano, a sculptor of Florence, of whom we are now about to write the Life, to the end that the world may know how able and practised a sculptor he was, and with what diligence he carved marble in strong relief against its ground in the marvellous works that he made. Among the first of many labours that this master executed in Florence, may be numbered a chimney-piece of grey-stone that is in the house of Pier Francesco Borgherini, wherein are capitals, friezes, and many other ornaments, carved by his hand in open-work with great diligence. In the house of Messer Bindo Altoviti, likewise, is a chimney-piece by the same hand, with a lavatory of marble, and some other things executed with much delicacy; but everything in these that has to do with architecture was designed by Jacopo Sansovino, then a young man.
This misfortune happened to Benedetto da Rovezzano, a sculptor from Florence, whose life we are about to discuss, so that the world may understand how skilled and experienced he was, and how diligently he carved marble in high relief in his incredible works. Among the many projects this master completed in Florence is a gray stone fireplace located in the home of Pier Francesco Borgherini, which features capitals, friezes, and numerous other ornaments, all carved by his hand with great care. In the home of Messer Bindo Altoviti, there is also a fireplace by the same artist, along with a marble sink and various other delicate pieces; however, all the architectural elements in these works were designed by Jacopo Sansovino, who was then a young man.
[Pg 36] Next, in the year 1512, Benedetto received the commission for a tomb of marble, with rich ornaments, in the principal chapel of the Carmine in Florence, for Piero Soderini, who had been Gonfalonier in that city; and that work was executed by him with incredible diligence, seeing that, besides foliage, carved emblems of death, and figures, he made therein with basanite, in low-relief, a canopy in imitation of black cloth, with so much grace and such beautiful finish and lustre, that the stone appears to be exquisite black satin rather than basanite. And, to put it in a few words, for all that the hand of Benedetto did in this work there is no praise that would not seem too little.
[Pg 36] Next, in 1512, Benedetto was commissioned to create a marble tomb with elaborate decorations in the main chapel of the Carmine in Florence for Piero Soderini, who had served as Gonfalonier in the city. He executed this work with remarkable care, as he included leafy designs, carved symbols of death, and figures, and he crafted a canopy in basanite that mimicked black cloth in low relief. It was done with such elegance and stunning detail that the stone looks more like luxurious black satin than basanite. To put it simply, for everything Benedetto accomplished in this project, no praise feels adequate.
And since he also gave his attention to architecture, there was restored from the design of Benedetto a house near S. Apostolo in Florence, belonging to Messer Oddo Altoviti, Patron and Prior of that church. There Benedetto made the principal door in marble, and, over the door of the house, the arms of the Altoviti in grey-stone, with the wolf, lean, excoriated, and carved in such strong relief, that it seems to be almost separate from the shield; and some pendant ornaments carved in open-work with such delicacy, that they appear to be not of stone, but of the finest paper. In the same church, above the two chapels of Messer Bindo Altoviti, for which Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo painted the panel-picture of the Conception in oils, Benedetto made a marble tomb for the said Messer Oddo, surrounded by an ornament full of most masterly foliage, with a sarcophagus, likewise very beautiful.
And since he also focused on architecture, a house near S. Apostolo in Florence, owned by Messer Oddo Altoviti, Patron and Prior of that church, was restored based on Benedetto's design. Here, Benedetto created the main door in marble, and above the door of the house, he placed the Altoviti coat of arms in grey stone, featuring a wolf that appears emaciated and is carved in such strong relief that it looks almost detached from the shield; along with some pendant ornaments intricately carved in open-work so delicately that they seem more like fine paper than stone. In the same church, above the two chapels of Messer Bindo Altoviti, for which Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo painted the panel picture of the Conception in oils, Benedetto crafted a marble tomb for Messer Oddo, surrounded by an ornament filled with exquisitely crafted foliage, complete with a beautifully designed sarcophagus.
Benedetto also executed, in competition with Jacopo Sansovino and Baccio Bandinelli, as has been related, one of the Apostles, four and a half braccia in height, for S. Maria del Fiore—namely, a S. John the Evangelist, which is a passing good figure, wrought with fine design and skill. This figure is in the Office of Works, in company with the others.
Benedetto also created, alongside Jacopo Sansovino and Baccio Bandinelli, as previously mentioned, one of the Apostles, standing four and a half braccia tall, for S. Maria del Fiore—specifically, a St. John the Evangelist, which is a really good figure, crafted with great design and skill. This figure is in the Office of Works, along with the others.
Next, in the year 1515, the chiefs and heads of the Order of Vallombrosa, wishing to transfer the body of S. Giovanni Gualberto from the Abbey of Passignano to the Church of S. Trinità, an abbey of the same Order, in Florence, commissioned Benedetto to make a design, upon which he was to set to work, for a chapel and tomb combined, with a vast number of lifesize figures in the round, which were to be suitably [Pg 37] distributed over that work in some niches separated by pilasters filled with ornaments and friezes and with delicately carved grotesques. And below this whole work there was to be a base one braccio and a half in height, wherein were to be scenes from the life of the said S. Giovanni Gualberto; while endless numbers of other ornaments were to be round the sarcophagus, and as a crown to the work. On this tomb, then, Benedetto, assisted by many carvers, laboured continually for ten years, with vast expense to that Congregation; and he brought the work to completion in their house of Guarlondo, a place near San Salvi, without the Porta alla Croce, where the General of the Order that was having the work executed almost always lived. Benedetto, then, carried out the making of that chapel and tomb in such a manner as amazed Florence; but, as Fate would have it—for even marbles and the finest works of men of excellence are subject to the whims of fortune—after much discord among those monks, their government was changed, and the work remained unfinished in the same place until the year 1530. At which time, war raging round Florence, all those labours were ruined by soldiers, the heads wrought with such diligence were impiously struck off from the little figures, and the whole work was so completely destroyed and broken to pieces, that the monks afterwards sold what was left for a mere song. If any one wishes to see a part of it, let him go to the Office of Works of S. Maria del Fiore, where there are a few pieces, bought as broken marble not many years ago by the officials of that place. And, in truth, even as everything is brought to fine completion in those monasteries and other places where peace and concord reign, so, on the contrary, nothing ever reaches perfection or an end worthy of praise in places where there is naught save rivalry and discord, because what takes a good and wise man a hundred years to build up can be destroyed by an ignorant and crazy boor in one day. And it seems as if fortune wishes that those who know the least and delight in nothing that is excellent, should always be the men who govern and command, or rather, ruin, everything: as was also said of secular Princes, with no less learning than truth, by Ariosto, at the beginning of his seventeenth canto. But returning to Benedetto: it was a sad pity that all his labours [Pg 38] and all the money spent by that Order should have come to such a miserable end.
Next, in the year 1515, the leaders of the Order of Vallombrosa, wanting to move the body of S. Giovanni Gualberto from the Abbey of Passignano to the Church of S. Trinità, an abbey of the same Order in Florence, commissioned Benedetto to create a design for a combined chapel and tomb. This project was to include a large number of lifesize figures, which were to be appropriately [Pg 37] distributed in niches separated by pilasters adorned with ornaments and friezes, featuring delicately carved grotesques. Below the entire work, there was to be a base one and a half braccio in height, which would depict scenes from the life of S. Giovanni Gualberto; numerous other ornaments were to surround the sarcophagus and serve as a crown for the work. So, Benedetto, assisted by many carvers, worked continually for ten years, at great expense to that Congregation, and he completed the project at their house of Guarlondo, near San Salvi, outside the Porta alla Croce, where the General of the Order often resided. Benedetto executed the chapel and tomb in such a way that it astonished Florence; however, as fate would have it—since even the finest marble works created by talented individuals can be affected by fortune's whims—after much discord among those monks, their leadership changed, leaving the work unfinished until 1530. At that time, with war ravaging Florence, all those efforts were destroyed by soldiers; the heads, which had been meticulously crafted, were wickedly chopped off the small figures, and the entire project was utterly wrecked and shattered, resulting in the monks selling the remnants for a pittance. If anyone wants to see part of it, they should visit the Office of Works of S. Maria del Fiore, where a few pieces, bought as broken marble not many years ago by the officials there, can be found. Indeed, just as everything reaches beautiful completion in monasteries and places where peace and harmony exist, on the contrary, nothing ever achieves perfection or a worthy conclusion in environments filled with rivalry and discord, because what a wise person can build over a hundred years can be destroyed by a foolish and reckless person in a single day. It seems as though fortune prefers those who know the least and appreciate nothing excellent to always be the ones who govern and control, or rather, ruin everything, as was also remarked about secular princes, with no less wisdom than truth, by Ariosto at the start of his seventeenth canto. But back to Benedetto: it was truly unfortunate that all his efforts [Pg 38] and all the money spent by that Order came to such a miserable end.
By the same architect were designed the door and vestibule of the Badia of Florence, and likewise some chapels, among them that of S. Stefano, erected by the family of the Pandolfini. Finally, Benedetto was summoned to England into the service of the King, for whom he executed many works in marble and in bronze, and, in particular, his tomb; from which works, through the liberality of that King, he gained enough to be able to live in comfort for the rest of his life. Thereupon he returned to Florence; but, after he had finished some little things, a sort of giddiness, which even in England had begun to affect his eyes, and other troubles caused, so it was said, by standing too long over the fire in the founding of metals, or by some other reasons, in a short time robbed him completely of the sight of his eyes; wherefore he ceased to work about the year 1550, and to live a few years after that. Benedetto endured that blindness during the last years of his life with the patience of a good Christian, thanking God that He had first enabled him, by means of his labours, to live an honourable life.
By the same architect, the door and entrance of the Badia in Florence were designed, along with some chapels, including that of S. Stefano, built by the Pandolfini family. Eventually, Benedetto was called to England to work for the King, for whom he created many marble and bronze pieces, especially his tomb. Thanks to the King's generosity, he earned enough to live comfortably for the rest of his life. Afterward, he returned to Florence; however, after completing a few minor projects, he began to experience dizziness that had already started affecting his eyesight in England. Other issues, said to be caused by standing too long over the fire while working with metals or other reasons, soon left him completely blind. As a result, he stopped working around the year 1550 and lived a few more years after that. Benedetto faced his blindness in the final years of his life with the patience of a good Christian, thanking God for allowing him to live an honorable life through his work.
Benedetto was a courteous gentleman, and he always delighted in the society of men of culture. His portrait was copied from one made, when he was a young man, by Agnolo di Donnino. This original is in our book of drawings, wherein there are also some drawings very well executed by the hand of Benedetto, who deserves, on account of all those works, to be numbered among our most excellent craftsmen.
Benedetto was a polite gentleman who always enjoyed the company of cultured men. His portrait was based on one created when he was young by Agnolo di Donnino. The original is in our collection of drawings, which also includes some very well-executed sketches by Benedetto himself, who deserves to be recognized as one of our finest craftsmen because of all those works.

TOMB OF PIETRO SODERINI
(After Benedetto da Rovezzano.
Florence: S. Maria del Carmine)
Alinari
View larger image
TOMB OF PIETRO SODERINI
(After Benedetto da Rovezzano.
Florence: S. Maria del Carmine)
Alinari
View larger image
[Pg 39] BACCIO DA MONTELUPO AND RAFFAELLO, HIS SON
[Pg 41] LIVES OF BACCIO DA MONTELUPO
SCULPTOR
AND OF RAFFAELLO, HIS SON
So strong is the belief of mankind that those who are negligent in the arts which they profess to practise can never arrive at any perfection in them, that it was in the face of the judgment of many that Baccio da Montelupo learnt the art of sculpture; and this happened to him because in his youth, led astray by pleasures, he would scarcely ever study, and, although he was exhorted and upbraided by many, he thought little or nothing of art. But having come to years of discretion, which bring sense with them, he was forced straightway to learn how far he was from the good way. Whereupon, seeing with shame that others were going ahead of him in that art, he resolved with a stout heart to follow and practise with all possible zeal that which in his idleness he had hitherto shunned. This resolution was the reason that he produced in sculpture such fruits as the opinions of many no longer expected from him.
So strong is the belief of people that those who are careless in the skills they claim to practice can never achieve any mastery in them, that it was despite many opinions that Baccio da Montelupo learned the art of sculpture; this happened because, in his youth, distracted by pleasures, he rarely studied, and even though many urged and criticized him, he paid little attention to art. However, once he reached a level of maturity that brings clarity, he quickly realized how far he was from the right path. Seeing with shame that others were advancing in that art, he resolved with determination to pursue and practice with all possible enthusiasm what he had previously avoided in his laziness. This decision led him to create works in sculpture that many no longer expected from him.
Having thus devoted himself with all his powers to his art, and practising it continually, he became a rare and excellent master. And of this he gave a proof in a work in hard-stone, wrought with the chisel, on the corner of the garden attached to the Palace of the Pucci in Florence; which was the escutcheon of Pope Leo X, with two children supporting it, executed in a beautiful and masterly manner. He made a Hercules for Pier Francesco de' Medici; and from the Guild of Porta Santa Maria he received the commission for a statue of S. John the Evangelist, to be executed in bronze, in securing which he had many difficulties, since a number of masters made models in competition with [Pg 42] him. This figure was afterwards placed on the corner of S. Michele in Orto, opposite to the Ufficio; and the work was finished by him with supreme diligence. It is said that when he had made the figure in clay, all who saw the arrangement of the armatures, and the moulds laid upon them, held it to be a beautiful piece of work, recognizing the rare ingenuity of Baccio in such an enterprise; and when they had seen it cast with the utmost facility, they gave Baccio credit for having shown supreme mastery, and having made a solid and beautiful casting. These labours endured in that profession, brought him the name of a good and even excellent master; and that figure is esteemed more than ever at the present day by all craftsmen, who hold it to be most beautiful.
Having fully committed himself to his art and practicing it constantly, he became a remarkable and skilled master. He demonstrated this in a stone work, carved with a chisel, at the corner of the garden of the Palace of the Pucci in Florence; it featured the coat of arms of Pope Leo X supported by two children, executed beautifully and expertly. He created a Hercules statue for Pier Francesco de' Medici and received a commission from the Guild of Porta Santa Maria for a bronze statue of St. John the Evangelist. Securing this commission was challenging, as several other masters submitted competing models. This statue was eventually placed on the corner of St. Michele in Orto, across from the Ufficio, and he completed the work with exceptional diligence. It's said that when he created the figure in clay, everyone who saw the setup of the armatures and the molds admired it, recognizing Baccio's rare ingenuity in such an endeavor. When they saw it cast so effortlessly, they credited Baccio with demonstrating supreme skill in creating a solid and beautiful casting. His dedication to this craft earned him the reputation of being a good and even excellent master; today, that figure is regarded as more beautiful than ever by all craftsmen.
Setting himself also to work in wood, he carved lifesize Crucifixes, of which he made an endless number for all parts of Italy, and among them one that is over the door of the choir of the Monks of S. Marco at Florence. These are all excellent and full of grace, but there are some that are much more perfect than the rest, such as the one of the Murate in Florence, and another, no less famous than the first, in S. Pietro Maggiore; and for the Monks of SS. Fiora e Lucilla he made a similar one, which they placed over the high-altar of their abbey at Arezzo, and which is held to be much the most beautiful of them all. For the visit of Pope Leo X to Florence, Baccio erected between the Palace of the Podestà and the Badia a very beautiful triumphal arch of wood and clay; with many little works, which have either disappeared or been dispersed among the houses of citizens.
Getting into woodworking, he carved lifesize crucifixes, creating countless pieces for all over Italy, including one that hangs over the door of the choir of the Monks of San Marco in Florence. These are all impressive and filled with grace, but some are much more perfect than the others, like the one at the Murate in Florence, and another just as famous at San Pietro Maggiore. For the Monks of San Fiora e Lucilla, he made a similar piece, which they placed above the high altar of their abbey in Arezzo, and it is considered the most beautiful of them all. For Pope Leo X's visit to Florence, Baccio built a stunning triumphal arch out of wood and clay between the Palace of the Podestà and the Badia, featuring many small works that have either disappeared or been scattered among citizens' homes.
Having grown weary, however, of living in Florence, he went off to Lucca, where he executed some works in sculpture, and even more in architecture, in the service of that city, and, in particular, the beautiful and well-designed Temple of S. Paulino, the Patron Saint of the people of Lucca, built with proofs of a fine and well-trained intelligence both within and without, and richly adorned. Living in that city, then, up to the eighty-eighth year of his life, he ended his days there, and received honourable burial in the aforesaid S. Paulino from those whom he had honoured when alive.
Having grown tired of living in Florence, he moved to Lucca, where he created several sculptures and even more architectural works for the city, including the beautiful and well-designed Temple of S. Paulino, the Patron Saint of the people of Lucca, which showcased a fine and well-trained intellect both inside and out, and was richly decorated. He lived in that city until he was eighty-eight years old, passing away there, and received an honorable burial in the aforementioned S. Paulino from those he had honored during his life.

S. JOHN THE EVANGELIST
(After Baccio da Montelupo.
Florence: Or San Michele)
Alinari
View larger image
S. JOHN THE EVANGELIST
(After Baccio da Montelupo.
Florence: Or San Michele)
Alinari
View larger image
A contemporary of Baccio was Agostino, a very famous sculptor and carver of Milan, who began in S. Maria, at Milan, the tomb of Monsignore [Pg 43] de Foix, which remains unfinished even now; and in it may still be seen many large figures, some finished, some half completed, and others only blocked out, with a number of scenes in half-relief, in pieces and not built in, and a great quantity of foliage and trophies. For the Biraghi, also, he made another tomb, which is finished and erected in S. Francesco, with six large figures, the base wrought with scenes, and other very beautiful ornaments, which bear witness to the masterly skill of that valiant craftsman.
A contemporary of Baccio was Agostino, a well-known sculptor and carver from Milan. He started the tomb of Monsignore [Pg 43] de Foix at S. Maria in Milan, which remains unfinished to this day. In it, you can still see many large figures—some finished, some partially completed, and others just rough outlines—along with several scenes in shallow relief, separate pieces, and a lot of intricate foliage and trophies. He also created another tomb for the Biraghi, which is completed and stands in S. Francesco, featuring six large figures, a base decorated with scenes, and other beautiful ornaments that showcase the masterful skill of that talented craftsman.
Baccio left at his death, among other sons, Raffaello, who applied himself to sculpture, and not merely equalled his father, but surpassed him by a great measure. This Raffaello, beginning in his youth to work in clay, in wax, and in bronze, acquired the name of an excellent sculptor, and was therefore taken by Antonio da San Gallo to Loreto, together with many others, in order to finish the ornamentation of that Chamber, according to the directions left by Andrea Sansovino; where Raffaello completely finished the Marriage of Our Lady, begun by the said Sansovino, executing many things in a beautiful and perfect manner, partly over the beginnings of Andrea, and partly from his own invention. Wherefore he was deservedly esteemed to be one of the best craftsmen who worked there in his time.
Baccio left behind several sons at his death, including Raffaello, who dedicated himself to sculpture and not only matched his father's skill but greatly surpassed it. Raffaello started working with clay, wax, and bronze in his youth and earned a reputation as an excellent sculptor. Antonio da San Gallo took him, along with many others, to Loreto to finish the decoration of the Chamber, following the plans left by Andrea Sansovino. Raffaello completed the Marriage of Our Lady, which Sansovino had begun, executing many aspects beautifully and perfectly, building on Andrea's initial work and incorporating his own ideas. As a result, he was rightly regarded as one of the best craftsmen of his time.
He had finished this work, when Michelagnolo, by order of Pope Clement VII, proceeded to finish the new sacristy and the library of S. Lorenzo in Florence; and that master, having recognized the talent of Raffaello, made use of him in that work, and caused him to execute, among other things, after the model that he himself had made, the S. Damiano of marble which is now in that sacristy—a very beautiful statue, very highly extolled by all men. After the death of Clement, Raffaello attached himself to Duke Alessandro de' Medici, who was then having the fortress of Prato built; and he made for him in grey-stone, on one of the extremities of the chief bastion of that fortress—namely, on the outer side—the escutcheon of the Emperor Charles V, upheld by two nude and lifesize Victories, which were much extolled, as they still are. And for the extremity of another bastion, in the direction of the city, on the southern side, he made the arms of Duke Alessandro in the same kind of stone, with two figures. Not long after, he executed a large Crucifix [Pg 44] of wood for the Nuns of S. Apollonia; and for Alessandro Antinori, a very rich and noble merchant of Florence at that time, he prepared a most magnificent festival for the marriage of his daughter, with statues, scenes, and many other most beautiful ornaments.
He had finished this work when Michelangelo, by order of Pope Clement VII, began to complete the new sacristy and the library of St. Lorenzo in Florence. Recognizing Raffaello's talent, he involved him in the project, leading Raffaello to create, among other things, the marble St. Damiano statue, which is now in that sacristy and is a beautiful piece highly praised by everyone. After Clement's death, Raffaello allied himself with Duke Alessandro de' Medici, who was then constructing the Prato fortress. He crafted, in gray stone, the coat of arms of Emperor Charles V on one end of the main bastion of the fortress—on the outer side—supported by two life-size nude Victories, which were widely acclaimed, just as they are today. For another bastion, facing the city on the southern side, he created Duke Alessandro's arms in the same type of stone, featuring two figures. Shortly after, he completed a large wooden Crucifix [Pg 44] for the Nuns of St. Apollonia, and for Alessandro Antinori, a wealthy and noble merchant in Florence at that time, he organized an extravagant celebration for his daughter's wedding, complete with statues, scenes, and many other beautiful decorations.
Having then gone to Rome, he received from Buonarroti a commission to make two figures of marble, each five braccia high, for the tomb of Julius II, which was finished and erected at that time by Michelagnolo in S. Pietro in Vincula. But Raffaello, falling ill while he was executing this work, was not able to put into it his usual zeal and diligence, on which account he lost credit thereby, and gave little satisfaction to Michelagnolo. At the visit of the Emperor Charles V to Rome, for which Pope Paul III prepared a festival worthy of that all-conquering Prince, Raffaello made with clay and stucco, on the Ponte S. Angelo, fourteen statues so beautiful, that they were judged to be the best that had been made for that festival. And, what is more, he executed them with such rapidity that he was in time to come to Florence, where the Emperor was likewise expected, to make within the space of five days and no more, on the abutment of the Ponte a S. Trinità two Rivers of clay, each five braccia high, the Rhine to stand for Germany and the Danube for Hungary.
Having traveled to Rome, he received a commission from Buonarroti to create two marble figures, each five braccia high, for the tomb of Julius II, which Michelangelo was finishing and setting up at that time in S. Pietro in Vincula. However, Raffaello fell ill while working on this project and couldn’t bring his usual passion and diligence to it, which caused him to lose credibility and left Michelangelo dissatisfied. During Emperor Charles V’s visit to Rome, for which Pope Paul III organized a festival worthy of the conquering prince, Raffaello crafted fourteen stunning statues out of clay and stucco on the Ponte S. Angelo, which were considered the finest made for the celebration. Moreover, he completed them so quickly that he was able to head to Florence, where the Emperor was also expected, and within just five days, he created two clay Rivers on the abutment of the Ponte a S. Trinità, each five braccia high, representing the Rhine for Germany and the Danube for Hungary.
After this, having been summoned to Orvieto, he made in marble, in a chapel wherein the excellent sculptor Mosca had previously executed many most beautiful ornaments, the story of the Magi in half-relief, which proved to be a very fine work, on account of the great variety of figures and the good manner with which he executed them.
After this, after being called to Orvieto, he created in marble, in a chapel where the talented sculptor Mosca had previously crafted many beautiful decorations, the story of the Magi in half-relief, which turned out to be an impressive piece due to the great variety of figures and the skill with which he executed them.

HEAD OF GASTON DE FOIX, FROM THE TOMB
(After Agostino Busti [Il Bambaja].
Milan: Brera)
Alinari
View larger image
HEAD OF GASTON DE FOIX, FROM THE TOMB
(After Agostino Busti [Il Bambaja].
Milan: Brera)
Alinari
View larger image
Then, having returned to Rome, he was appointed by Tiberio Crispo, at that time Castellan of the Castello di S. Angelo, as architect of that great structure; whereupon he set in order many rooms there, adorning them with carvings in many kinds of stone and various sorts of variegated marbles on the chimney-pieces, windows, and doors. In addition to this, he made a marble statue, five braccia high, of the Angel of that Castle, which is on the summit of the great square tower in the centre, where the standard flies, after the likeness of that Angel that appeared to S. Gregory, who, having prayed that the people should be delivered from a most grievous pestilence, saw him sheathing his sword in the [Pg 45] scabbard. Later, when the said Crispo had been made a Cardinal, he sent Raffaello several times to Bolsena, where he was building a palace. Nor was it long before the very reverend Cardinal Salviati and Messer Baldassarre Turini da Pescia commissioned Raffaello, who had already left the service of the Castle and of Cardinal Crispo, to make the statue of Pope Leo that is now over his tomb in the Minerva at Rome. That work finished, Raffaello made a tomb for the same Messer Baldassarre in the Church of Pescia, where that gentleman had built a chapel of marble. And for a chapel in the Consolazione, at Rome, he made three figures of marble in half-relief. But afterwards, having given himself up to the sort of life fit rather for a philosopher than for a sculptor, and wishing to live in peace, he retired to Orvieto, where he undertook the charge of the building of S. Maria, in which he made many improvements; and with this he occupied himself for many years, growing old before his time.
Then, after returning to Rome, he was appointed by Tiberio Crispo, who was then the Castellan of the Castello di S. Angelo, as the architect of that grand structure. He organized many rooms there, decorating them with carvings in different types of stone and various kinds of colorful marbles on the chimneys, windows, and doors. Additionally, he created a five-braccia tall marble statue of the Angel of that Castle, which stands on top of the central square tower where the flag flies, resembling the Angel that appeared to S. Gregory, who, after praying for the people's deliverance from a terrible plague, saw him sheathing his sword in the [Pg 45] scabbard. Later on, after Crispo became a Cardinal, he sent Raffaello several times to Bolsena, where he was constructing a palace. Soon after, the very reverend Cardinal Salviati and Messer Baldassarre Turini da Pescia commissioned Raffaello, who had already left the service of the Castle and Cardinal Crispo, to create the statue of Pope Leo that currently sits over his tomb in the Minerva in Rome. Once that work was finished, Raffaello crafted a tomb for Messer Baldassarre in the Church of Pescia, where that gentleman had built a marble chapel. He also created three marble half-relief figures for a chapel in Consolazione, Rome. However, later on, he chose to embrace a lifestyle more suited for a philosopher than a sculptor and sought to live in peace, retiring to Orvieto, where he took on the task of building S. Maria, making many improvements there. He dedicated himself to this for many years, aging before his time.

S. DAMIANO
(After Raffaello da Montelupo.
Florence: New Sacristy of S.
Lorenzo)
Alinari
View larger image
S. DAMIANO
(After Raffaello da Montelupo.
Florence: New Sacristy of S.
Lorenzo)
Alinari
View larger image
I believe that Raffaello, if he had undertaken great works, as he might have done, would have executed more things in art, and better, than he did. But he was too kindly and considerate, avoiding all conflict, and contenting himself with that wherewith fortune had provided him; and thus he neglected many opportunities of making works of distinction. Raffaello was a very masterly draughtsman, and he had a much better knowledge of all matters of art than had been shown by his father Baccio. In our book are some drawings by the hand both of the one and of the other; but those of Raffaello are much the finer and more graceful, and executed with better art. In his architectural decorations Raffaello followed in great measure the manner of Michelagnolo, as is proved by the chimney-pieces, doors, and windows that he made in the aforesaid Castello di S. Angelo, and by some chapels built under his direction, in a rare and beautiful manner, at Orvieto.
I believe that Raffaello, if he had taken on bigger projects, which he could have, would have created more art, and of higher quality, than he did. However, he was too kind and considerate, steering clear of conflict, and settling for what life offered him; thus, he missed many chances to create exceptional works. Raffaello was a highly skilled draughtsman, and he had a much deeper understanding of art matters than his father Baccio had shown. Our book includes some drawings by both of them, but Raffaello's are far finer, more graceful, and executed with better skill. In his architectural designs, Raffaello largely followed Michelagnolo's style, as demonstrated by the chimney pieces, doors, and windows he created in the aforementioned Castello di S. Angelo, as well as some chapels built under his guidance, which are rare and beautifully done, at Orvieto.
But returning to Baccio: his death was a great grief to the people of Lucca, who had known him as a good and upright man, courteous to all, and very loving. Baccio's works date about the year of our Lord 1533. His dearest friend, who learnt many things from him, was Zaccaria da Volterra, who executed many works in terra-cotta at Bologna, some of which are in the Church of S. Giuseppe.
But back to Baccio: his death was a huge loss to the people of Lucca, who knew him as a good and honorable man, polite to everyone, and very affectionate. Baccio's works are dated around the year 1533. His closest friend, who learned a lot from him, was Zaccaria da Volterra, who created many terra-cotta pieces in Bologna, some of which can be found in the Church of S. Giuseppe.
[Pg 47] LORENZO DI CREDI

LORENZO DI CREDI: VENUS
(Florence: Uffizi, 3452. Panel)
View larger image
LORENZO DI CREDI: VENUS
(Florence: Uffizi, 3452. Panel)
View larger image
[Pg 49] LIFE OF LORENZO DI CREDI
PAINTER OF FLORENCE
The while that Maestro Credi, an excellent goldsmith in his day, was working in Florence with very good credit and repute, Andrea Sciarpelloni placed with him, to the end that he might learn that craft, his son Lorenzo, a young man of beautiful intellect and excellent character. And since the ability and willingness of the master to teach were not greater than the zeal and readiness with which the disciple absorbed whatever was shown to him, no long time passed before Lorenzo became not only a good and diligent designer, but also so able and finished a goldsmith, that no young man of that time was his equal; and this brought such honour to Credi, that from that day onward Lorenzo was always called by everyone, not Lorenzo Sciarpelloni, but Lorenzo di Credi.
The time when Maestro Credi, a highly regarded goldsmith in his era, was working in Florence with a strong reputation and respect, Andrea Sciarpelloni placed his son Lorenzo with him so that he could learn the craft. Lorenzo was a young man with a sharp mind and great character. The master’s ability and willingness to teach matched the disciple’s eagerness and readiness to absorb everything he was shown. It didn't take long before Lorenzo became not only a skilled and hardworking designer but also such an accomplished goldsmith that no other young man of that time could compare to him. This brought such recognition to Credi that from that point on, everyone referred to Lorenzo not as Lorenzo Sciarpelloni, but as Lorenzo di Credi.
Growing in courage, then, Lorenzo attached himself to Andrea Verrocchio, who at that time had taken it into his head to devote himself to painting; and under him, having Pietro Perugino and Leonardo da Vinci as his companions and friends, although they were rivals, he set himself with all diligence to learn to paint. And since Lorenzo took an extraordinary pleasure in the manner of Leonardo, he contrived to imitate it so well that there was no one who came nearer to it than he did in the high finish and thorough perfection of his works, as may be seen from many drawings that are in our book, executed with the style, with the pen, or in water-colours, among which are some drawings made from models of clay covered with waxed linen cloths and with liquid clay, imitated with such diligence, and finished with such patience, as it is scarcely possible to conceive, much less to equal.
Gaining confidence, Lorenzo joined Andrea Verrocchio, who at that time had decided to focus on painting. Alongside him, with Pietro Perugino and Leonardo da Vinci as both friends and rivals, he dedicated himself to learning the art of painting. Lorenzo was especially drawn to Leonardo's style, and he managed to imitate it so effectively that no one else came closer to its high quality and perfection in his works. This can be seen in many drawings included in our book, done in various styles, using pen or watercolors. Among these are some drawings made from clay models covered with waxed linen and liquid clay, crafted with such care and finished with such patience that it’s hard to believe, let alone replicate.
For these reasons, then, Lorenzo was so beloved by his master, that, when Andrea went to Venice to cast in bronze the horse and the statue [Pg 50] of Bartolommeo da Bergamo, he left to Lorenzo the whole management and administration of his revenues and affairs, and likewise all his drawings, reliefs, statues, and art materials. And Lorenzo, on his part, loved his master Andrea so dearly, that, besides occupying himself with incredible zeal with his interests in Florence, he also went more than once to Venice to see him and to render him an account of his good administration, which was so much to the satisfaction of his master, that, if Lorenzo had consented, Andrea would have made him his heir. Nor did Lorenzo prove in any way ungrateful for this good-will, for, after the death of Andrea, he went to Venice and brought his body to Florence; and then he handed over to his heirs everything that was found to belong to Andrea, except his drawings, pictures, sculptures, and all other things connected with art.
For these reasons, Lorenzo was so cherished by his master that when Andrea went to Venice to cast in bronze the horse and the statue [Pg 50] of Bartolommeo da Bergamo, he entrusted Lorenzo with the complete management and oversight of his income and affairs, along with all his drawings, reliefs, statues, and art supplies. Lorenzo, for his part, loved his master Andrea deeply, and besides dedicating himself wholeheartedly to his interests in Florence, he traveled to Venice multiple times to see him and report back on his successful management, which pleased Andrea so much that if Lorenzo had agreed, Andrea would have made him his heir. Lorenzo did not show any ingratitude for this kindness; after Andrea passed away, he went to Venice to retrieve his body and brought it back to Florence. He then returned to Andrea's heirs everything that belonged to him, except for his drawings, paintings, sculptures, and all other art-related items.
The first paintings of Lorenzo were a round picture of Our Lady, which was sent to the King of Spain (the design of which picture he copied from one by his master Andrea), and a picture, much better than the other, which was likewise copied by Lorenzo from one by Leonardo da Vinci, and also sent to Spain; and so similar was it to that by Leonardo, that no difference could be seen between the one and the other. By the hand of Lorenzo is a Madonna in a very well executed panel, which is beside the great Church of S. Jacopo at Pistoia; and another, also, which is in the Hospital of the Ceppo, and is one of the best pictures in that city. Lorenzo painted many portraits, and when he was a young man he made that one of himself which is now in the possession of his disciple, Gian Jacopo, a painter in Florence, together with many other things left to him by Lorenzo, among which are the portrait of Pietro Perugino and that of Lorenzo's master, Andrea Verrocchio. He also made a portrait of Girolamo Benivieni, a man of great learning, and much his friend.
The first paintings by Lorenzo were a round image of Our Lady, which he sent to the King of Spain (the design of which he took from one by his master Andrea), and a much better painting that Lorenzo also copied from a work by Leonardo da Vinci, which was sent to Spain as well; it was so similar to Leonardo's that no one could tell the difference between the two. Lorenzo created a Madonna on a beautifully executed panel that is next to the great Church of S. Jacopo in Pistoia, and another one in the Hospital of the Ceppo, which is considered one of the best paintings in the city. Lorenzo painted many portraits, and when he was young, he made one of himself that is now owned by his disciple, Gian Jacopo, a painter in Florence, along with many other items left to him by Lorenzo, including the portrait of Pietro Perugino and that of Lorenzo's master, Andrea Verrocchio. He also painted a portrait of Girolamo Benivieni, a highly educated man and a close friend.

ANDREA VERROCCHIO
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Florence: Uffizi, 1163)
Anderson
View larger image
ANDREA VERROCCHIO
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Florence: Uffizi, 1163)
Anderson
View larger image
For the Company of S. Sebastiano, behind the Church of the Servi in Florence, he executed a panel-picture of Our Lady, S. Sebastian, and other saints; and for the altar of S. Giuseppe, in S. Maria del Fiore, he painted the first-named saint. To Montepulciano he sent a panel that is now in the Church of S. Agostino, containing a Crucifix, Our Lady, and S. John, painted with much diligence. But the best work that [Pg 51] Lorenzo ever executed, and that to which he devoted the greatest care and zeal, in order to surpass himself, was the one that is in a chapel at Cestello, a panel containing Our Lady, S. Julian, and S. Nicholas; and whoever wishes to know how necessary it is for a painter to work with a high finish in oils if he desires that his pictures should remain fresh, must look at this panel, which is painted with such a finish as could not be excelled.
For the Company of S. Sebastiano, located behind the Church of the Servi in Florence, he created a panel painting of Our Lady, S. Sebastian, and other saints. For the altar of S. Giuseppe in S. Maria del Fiore, he painted the first-mentioned saint. He sent a panel to Montepulciano that is now in the Church of S. Agostino, featuring a Crucifix, Our Lady, and S. John, painted with great attention to detail. However, the best work that [Pg 51] Lorenzo ever produced, and the one he put the most effort and dedication into, was the panel located in a chapel at Cestello, depicting Our Lady, S. Julian, and S. Nicholas. Anyone who wants to understand how crucial it is for a painter to work with a high level of finish in oils to keep their paintings looking fresh must look at this panel, painted with an unmatched level of detail.
While still a young man, Lorenzo painted a S. Bartholomew on a pilaster in Orsanmichele, and for the Nuns of S. Chiara, in Florence, a panel-picture of the Nativity of Christ, with some shepherds and angels; in which picture, besides other things, he took great pains with the imitation of some herbage, painting it so well that it appears to be real. For the same place he made a picture of S. Mary Magdalene in Penitence; and in a round picture that is in the house of Messer Ottaviano de' Medici he painted a Madonna. For S. Friano he painted a panel; and he executed some figures in S. Matteo at the Hospital of Lelmo. For S. Reparata he painted a picture with the Angel Michael, and for the Company of the Scalzo he made a panel-picture, executed with much diligence. And, in addition to these works, he made many pictures of Our Lady and others, which are dispersed among the houses of citizens in Florence.
While still a young man, Lorenzo painted a St. Bartholomew on a pilaster in Orsanmichele, and for the Nuns of St. Chiara in Florence, he created a panel painting of the Nativity of Christ, featuring some shepherds and angels. In this painting, he took great care in portraying some greenery, rendering it so skillfully that it looks realistic. For the same location, he made a painting of St. Mary Magdalene in Penitence, and in a round painting located in the home of Messer Ottaviano de' Medici, he depicted a Madonna. For St. Friano, he painted a panel, and he created several figures in St. Matteo at the Hospital of Lelmo. For St. Reparata, he painted a picture with the Archangel Michael, and for the Company of the Scalzo, he created a panel painting executed with great care. In addition to these works, he produced many pictures of Our Lady and others that are now spread across the homes of citizens in Florence.
Having thus got together a certain sum of money by means of these labours, and being a man who loved quiet more than riches, Lorenzo retired to S. Maria Nuova in Florence, where he lived and had a comfortable lodging until his death. Lorenzo was much inclined to the sect of Fra Girolamo of Ferrara, and always lived like an upright and orderly man, showing a friendly courtesy whenever the occasion arose. Finally, having come to the seventy-eighth year of his life, he died of old age, and was buried in S. Pietro Maggiore, in the year 1530.
Having gathered a certain amount of money through these efforts, and being a man who valued peace more than wealth, Lorenzo moved to S. Maria Nuova in Florence, where he lived comfortably until his death. Lorenzo was quite drawn to the teachings of Fra Girolamo of Ferrara and always lived as an honest and respectable man, showing kindness whenever he had the chance. Ultimately, after reaching the age of seventy-eight, he died of natural causes and was buried in S. Pietro Maggiore in the year 1530.
He showed such a perfection of finish in his works, that any other painting, in comparison with his, must always seem merely sketched and dirty. He left many disciples, and among them Giovanni Antonio Sogliani and Tommaso di Stefano. Of Sogliani there will be an account in another place; and as for Tommaso, he imitated his master closely in his high finish, and made many works in Florence and abroad, including [Pg 52] a panel-picture for Marco del Nero at his villa of Arcetri, of the Nativity of Christ, executed with great perfection of finish. But ultimately it became Tommaso's principal profession to paint on cloth, insomuch that he painted church-hangings better than any other man. Now Stefano, the father of Tommaso, had been an illuminator, and had also done something in architecture; and Tommaso, after his father's death, in order to follow in his steps, rebuilt the bridge of Sieve, which had been destroyed by a flood about that time, at a distance of ten miles from Florence, and likewise that of S. Piero a Ponte on the River Bisenzio, which is a beautiful work; and afterwards he erected many buildings for monasteries and other places. Then, being architect to the Guild of Wool, he made the model for the new buildings which were constructed by that Guild behind the Nunziata; and, finally, having reached the age of seventy or more, he died in the year 1564, and was buried in S. Marco, to which he was followed by an honourable train of the Academy of Design.
He showed such incredible attention to detail in his works that any other painting, when compared to his, always seems just a rough sketch and dirty. He had many followers, including Giovanni Antonio Sogliani and Tommaso di Stefano. Sogliani will be discussed elsewhere, and as for Tommaso, he closely imitated his master’s meticulous style and created many works in Florence and beyond, including [Pg 52] a panel painting for Marco del Nero at his villa in Arcetri, depicting the Nativity of Christ, completed with exceptional detail. Ultimately, Tommaso specialized in painting on cloth, excelling in creating church hangings better than anyone else. Now, Stefano, Tommaso's father, was an illuminator and also worked in architecture; after his father passed away, Tommaso followed in his footsteps by rebuilding the Sieve bridge, which had been washed away by a flood around that time, located ten miles from Florence, as well as the bridge of S. Piero a Ponte over the River Bisenzio, which is a beautiful structure. He also built many buildings for monasteries and other places. Then, serving as the architect for the Guild of Wool, he created the model for the new buildings constructed by that Guild behind the Nunziata; finally, after reaching the age of seventy or more, he died in 1564 and was buried in S. Marco, attended by a respectable group from the Academy of Design.
But returning to Lorenzo: he left many works unfinished at his death, and, in particular, a very beautiful picture of the Passion of Christ, which came into the hands of Antonio da Ricasoli, and a panel painted for M. Francesco da Castiglioni, Canon of S. Maria del Fiore, who sent it to Castiglioni. Lorenzo had no wish to make many large works, because he took great pains in executing his pictures, and devoted an incredible amount of labour to them, for the reason, above all, that the colours which he used were ground too fine; besides which, he was always purifying and distilling his nut-oils, and he made mixtures of colours on his palette in such numbers, that from the first of the light tints to the last of the darks there was a gradual succession involving an over-careful and truly excessive elaboration, so that at times he had twenty-five or thirty of them on his palette. For each tint he kept a separate brush; and where he was working he would never allow any movement that might raise dust. Such excessive care is perhaps no more worthy of praise than the other extreme of negligence, for in all things one should observe a certain mean and avoid extremes, which are generally harmful.
But getting back to Lorenzo: he left many works unfinished when he died, especially a very beautiful painting of the Passion of Christ, which went to Antonio da Ricasoli, and a panel painted for M. Francesco da Castiglioni, Canon of S. Maria del Fiore, who sent it to Castiglioni. Lorenzo didn't want to create many large works because he put so much effort into his paintings and dedicated an incredible amount of work to them. This was mainly because the colors he used were ground too finely. Additionally, he was always purifying and distilling his nut oils, and he mixed colors on his palette in so many variations that there was a seamless transition from the lightest tints to the darkest, resulting in an overly careful and truly excessive level of detail, often having twenty-five or thirty on his palette at once. He used a separate brush for each tint, and while he was working, he never allowed any movement that could raise dust. Such excessive care might not deserve any more praise than the opposite extreme of negligence, as in everything, one should find a balance and avoid extremes, which can often be harmful.

MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Paris: Louvre, 1263)
Alinari
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Paris: Louvre, 1263)
Alinari
View larger image

THE NATIVITY
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Florence: Accademia, 92)
Anderson
View larger image
THE NATIVITY
(After the panel by Lorenzo di Credi.
Florence: Accademia, 92)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 53] LORENZETTO AND BOCCACCINO

BERNARDINO DEL LUPINO (LUINI): S. CATHARINE BORNE TO
HER TOMB BY ANGELS
(Milan: Brera, 288. Fresco)
View larger image
BERNARDINO DEL LUPINO (LUINI): ST. CATHERINE BEING TAKEN TO HER TOMB BY ANGELS
(Milan: Brera, 288. Fresco)
View larger image
[Pg 55] LIVES OF LORENZETTO
SCULPTOR AND ARCHITECT OF FLORENCE
AND OF BOCCACCINO
PAINTER OF CREMONA
It happens at times, after Fortune has kept the talent of some fine intellect subjected for a period by poverty, that she thinks better of it, and at an unexpected moment provides all sorts of benefits for one who has hitherto been the object of her hatred, so as to atone in one year for the affronts and discomforts of many. This was seen in Lorenzo, the son of Lodovico the bell-founder, a Florentine, who was engaged in the work both of architecture and of sculpture, and was loved so dearly by Raffaello da Urbino, that he not only was assisted by him and employed in many enterprises, but also received from the same master a wife in the person of a sister of Giulio Romano, a disciple of Raffaello.
Sometimes, after Fortune has kept someone with great talent down because of poverty for a while, she suddenly changes her mind and unexpectedly showers that person with all sorts of benefits, making up in a single year for the hardships and difficulties they faced before. This was seen in Lorenzo, the son of Lodovico the bell-founder, a Florentine who worked in both architecture and sculpture. He was so dearly loved by Raffaello da Urbino that not only did Raffaello support him and involve him in many projects, but he also gave him a wife in the form of a sister of Giulio Romano, a student of Raffaello.
Lorenzetto[4]—for thus he was always called—finished in his youth the tomb of Cardinal Forteguerra, formerly begun by Andrea Verrocchio, which was erected in S. Jacopo at Pistoia; and there, among other things, is a Charity by the hand of Lorenzetto, which is not otherwise than passing good. And a little afterwards he made a figure for Giovanni Bartolini, to adorn his garden; which finished, he went to Rome, where in his first years he executed many works, of which there is no need to make any further record. Then, receiving from Agostino Chigi, at the instance of Raffaello da Urbino, the commission to make a tomb for him in S. Maria del Popolo, where Agostino had built a chapel, Lorenzo set himself to work on this with all the zeal, diligence, and labour in his power, in order to come out of it with credit and to give satisfaction to Raffaello, from [Pg 56] whom he had reason to expect much favour and assistance, and also in the hope of being richly rewarded by the liberality of Agostino, a man of great wealth. Nor were these labours expended without an excellent result, for, assisted by Raffaello, he executed the figures to perfection: a nude Jonah delivered from the belly of the whale, as a symbol of the resurrection from the dead, and an Elijah, living by grace, with his cruse of water and his bread baked in the ashes, under the juniper-tree. These statues, then, were brought to the most beautiful completion by Lorenzetto with all the art and diligence at his command, but he did not by any means obtain for them that reward which his great labours and the needs of his family called for, since, death having closed the eyes of Agostino, and almost at the same time those of Raffaello, the heirs of Agostino, with scant respect, allowed these figures to remain in Lorenzetto's workshop, where they stood for many years. In our own day, indeed, they have been set into place on that tomb in the aforesaid Church of S. Maria del Popolo; but Lorenzo, robbed for those reasons of all hope, found for the present that he had thrown away his time and labour.
Lorenzetto[4]—that’s what he was always called—completed the tomb of Cardinal Forteguerra in his youth, which had been started by Andrea Verrocchio and was placed in S. Jacopo at Pistoia. There, among other works, is a Charity created by Lorenzetto that is really impressive. Shortly after, he made a figure for Giovanni Bartolini to enhance his garden; once that was done, he went to Rome, where in his early years he completed many works that don’t need further mention. Then, after receiving a commission from Agostino Chigi, at the request of Raffaello da Urbino, to create a tomb for him in S. Maria del Popolo—where Agostino had built a chapel—Lorenzo dedicated himself to this project with all the energy, meticulousness, and effort he could muster, aiming to achieve recognition and to please Raffaello, who he expected would provide him with substantial support, along with hopes of generous compensation from Agostino, a very wealthy man. These efforts proved worthwhile, as, with Raffaello's help, he executed the figures flawlessly: a nude Jonah being released from the belly of the whale, symbolizing resurrection, and Elijah, living off divine grace, with his jar of water and bread baked in ashes, resting under a juniper tree. Lorenzetto beautifully completed these statues with all the skill and diligence at his disposal, but he didn’t receive the recognition or compensation that his tremendous efforts and family’s needs demanded. After Agostino’s death, and shortly after Raffaello's passing, Agostino's heirs showed little regard and left these figures in Lorenzetto's workshop, where they remained for many years. In fact, they were only recently placed on that tomb in the aforementioned Church of S. Maria del Popolo; however, Lorenzo, stripped of all hope for those reasons, felt he had wasted his time and effort.

ELIJAH
(After Lorenzetto.
Rome: S. Maria del Popolo, Chigi Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image
ELIJAH
(After Lorenzetto.
Rome: S. Maria del Popolo, Chigi Chapel)
Anderson
View larger image
Next, by way of executing the testament of Raffaello, Lorenzo was commissioned to make a marble statue of Our Lady, four braccia high, for the tomb of Raffaello in the Temple of S. Maria Ritonda, where the tabernacle was restored by order of that master. The same Lorenzo made a tomb with two children in half-relief, for a merchant of the Perini family, in the Trinità at Rome. And in architecture he made the designs for many houses; in particular, that of the Palace of Messer Bernardino Caffarelli, and in the Valle, for Cardinal Andrea della Valle, the inner façade, and also the design of the stables and of the upper garden. In the composition of that work he included ancient columns, bases, and capitals, and around the whole, to serve as base, he distributed ancient sarcophagi covered with carved scenes. Higher up, below some large niches, he made another frieze with fragments of ancient works, and above this, in those niches, he placed some statues, likewise ancient and of marble, which, although they were not entire—some being without the head, some without arms, others without legs, and every one, in short, with something missing—nevertheless he arranged to the best [Pg 57] advantage, having caused all that was lacking to be restored by good sculptors. This was the reason that other lords have since done the same thing and have restored many ancient works; as, for example, Cardinals Cesis, Ferrara, and Farnese, and, in a word, all Rome. And, in truth, antiquities restored in this way have more grace than those mutilated trunks, members without heads, or figures in any other way maimed and defective. But to return to the aforesaid garden: over the niches was placed the frieze that is still seen there, of supremely beautiful ancient scenes in half-relief; and this invention of Lorenzo's stood him in very good stead, since, after the troubles of Pope Clement had abated, he was employed by him with much honour and profit to himself. For the Pope had seen, when the fight for the Castello di S. Angelo was raging, that two little chapels of marble, which were at the head of the bridge, had been a source of mischief, in that some harquebusiers, standing in them, shot down all who exposed themselves at the walls, and, themselves in safety, inflicted great losses and baulked the defence; and his Holiness resolved to remove those chapels and to set up in place of them two marble statues on pedestals. And so, after the S. Paul of Paolo Romano, of which there has been an account in another Life, had been set in place, the commission for the other, a S. Peter, was given to Lorenzetto, who acquitted himself passing well, but did not surpass the work of Paolo Romano. These two statues were set up, and are to be seen at the present day at the head of the bridge.
Next, to carry out Raffaello's will, Lorenzo was assigned to create a four-braccia high marble statue of Our Lady for Raffaello’s tomb in the Temple of S. Maria Ritonda, where the tabernacle was restored by that master. Lorenzo also made a tomb with two half-relief children for a merchant from the Perini family, located in the Trinità in Rome. In architecture, he designed many houses, particularly the Palace of Messer Bernardino Caffarelli, and in the Valle, for Cardinal Andrea della Valle, the inner façade, as well as the design for the stables and the upper garden. In this design, he incorporated ancient columns, bases, and capitals, and around the entire structure, he arranged ancient sarcophagi decorated with carved scenes as a base. Higher up, beneath several large niches, he created another frieze using fragments of ancient works, and in those niches, he placed some ancient marble statues, which, although incomplete—some missing heads, others missing arms, and some missing legs, each with something absent—were still arranged to the best advantage, as he had good sculptors restore everything that was lacking. Because of this, other lords have since followed suit and restored many ancient works, including Cardinals Cesis, Ferrara, and Farnese, truly, all of Rome. Restorations like these have more elegance than those mutilated remnants, members without heads, or figures that are otherwise damaged. But back to the garden: above the niches was placed the frieze that can still be seen today, featuring stunning ancient scenes in half-relief; this ingenious idea of Lorenzo’s served him well, as after Pope Clement's troubles had subsided, he was employed by him with much honor and benefit. The Pope had observed, during the siege of the Castello di S. Angelo, that two small marble chapels at the head of the bridge were problematic since some harquebusiers, sheltered within, shot down anyone who exposed themselves at the walls, causing significant losses and hindering the defense. His Holiness decided to remove those chapels and replace them with two marble statues on pedestals. After S. Paul by Paolo Romano, which has been detailed in another Life, was installed, the commission for the other statue, S. Peter, was given to Lorenzetto, who executed it quite well but did not surpass Paolo Romano's work. These two statues were erected and can still be seen today at the head of the bridge.

S. PETER
(After Lorenzetto.
Rome: Ponte S. Angelo)
Anderson
View larger image
S. PETER
(After Lorenzetto.
Rome: Ponte S. Angelo)
Anderson
View larger image
After Pope Clement was dead, Baccio Bandinelli was given the commissions for the tombs of that Pope and of Leo X, and Lorenzo was entrusted with the marble masonry that was to be executed for them; whereupon the latter spent no little time over that work. Finally, at the election of Paul III as Pontiff, when Lorenzo was in sorry straits and almost worn out, having nothing but a house which he had built for himself in the Macello de' Corbi, and being weighed down by his five children and by other expenses, Fortune changed and began to raise him and to set him back on a better path; for Pope Paul wishing to have the building of S. Pietro continued, and neither Baldassarre of Siena nor any of the others who had been employed in that work being now alive, [Pg 58] Antonio da San Gallo appointed Lorenzo as architect for that structure, wherein the walls were being built at a fixed price of so much for every four braccia. Thereupon Lorenzo, without exerting himself, in a few years became more famous and prosperous than he had been after many years of endless labour, through having found God, mankind, and Fortune all propitious at that one moment. And if he had lived longer, he would have done even more towards wiping out those injuries that a cruel fate had unjustly brought upon him during his best period of work. But after reaching the age of forty-seven, he died of fever in the year 1541.
After Pope Clement died, Baccio Bandinelli was given the commissions for the tombs of that Pope and Leo X, while Lorenzo was assigned the marble work for them; he dedicated a significant amount of time to this project. Finally, when Paul III was elected Pope, Lorenzo was in tough circumstances, nearly exhausted, with only a house he built for himself in the Macello de' Corbi, struggling with the burden of his five children and other expenses. However, his luck shifted, and he started to get back on a better path; Pope Paul wanted to continue the construction of S. Pietro, and since neither Baldassarre of Siena nor any of the others who had worked on it were still alive, [Pg 58] Antonio da San Gallo appointed Lorenzo as the architect for the project, where the walls were built at a fixed rate for every four braccia. Consequently, Lorenzo, without putting in much effort, became more famous and successful in a few years than he had in a lifetime of hard work, thanks to having God, people, and luck all on his side at that moment. If he had lived longer, he would have achieved even more in overcoming the setbacks caused by a cruel fate during his prime. But after reaching the age of forty-seven, he died of fever in 1541.
The death of this master caused great grief to his many friends, who had always known him as a loving and reasonable man. And since he had always lived like an upright and orderly citizen, the Deputati of S. Pietro gave him honourable burial in a tomb, on which they placed the following epitaph:
The death of this master brought immense sorrow to his many friends, who had always known him as a caring and sensible man. And because he lived as a respectable and well-mannered citizen, the Deputati of S. Pietro gave him a proper burial in a tomb, on which they placed the following epitaph:
SCULPTORI LAURENTIO FLORENTINO
To the Florentine sculptor Laurentio
ROMA MIHI TRIBUIT TUMULUM, FLORENTIA VITAM:
NEMO ALIO VELLET NASCI ET OBIRE LOCO.
MDXLI
VIX. ANN. XLVII, MEN. II, D. XV.
ROMA MIHI TRIBUIT TUMULUM, FLORENTIA VITAM:
NEMO ALIO VELLET NASCI ET OBIRE LOCO.
MDXLI
VIX. ANN. XLVII, MEN. II, D. XV.

MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Boccaccino.
Rome: Doria Gallery, 125)
Anderson
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Boccaccino.
Rome: Doria Gallery, 125)
Anderson
View larger image
Boccaccino of Cremona, who lived about the same time, had acquired the name of a rare and excellent painter in his native place and throughout all Lombardy, and his works were very highly extolled, when he went to Rome to see the works, so much renowned, of Michelagnolo; but no sooner had he seen them than he sought to the best of his power to disparage and revile them, believing that he could exalt himself almost exactly in proportion as he vilified a man who truly was in the matters of design, and indeed in all others without exception, supremely excellent. This master, then, was commissioned to paint the Chapel of S. Maria Traspontina; but when he had finished it and thrown it open to view, it was a revelation to all those who thought that he would soar above the heavens, for they saw that he could not reach even to the level of the [Pg 59] lowest floor of a house. And so the painters of Rome, on seeing the Coronation of Our Lady that he had painted in that work, with some children flying around her, changed from marvel to laughter.
Boccaccino of Cremona, who lived around the same time, had gained a reputation as a rare and exceptional painter in his hometown and throughout all of Lombardy. His works were greatly praised, so he traveled to Rome to see the famous works of Michelangelo. However, as soon as he saw them, he tried his best to criticize and belittle them, thinking he could elevate himself by putting down a truly exceptional artist in terms of design and in every other area. This master was then commissioned to paint the Chapel of S. Maria Traspontina; but when he finished and revealed it, it shocked everyone who expected him to reach extraordinary heights, as they saw that he couldn't even reach the level of the [Pg 59] lowest floor of a house. Consequently, the painters of Rome, upon seeing the Coronation of Our Lady he painted with some children flying around her, went from amazement to laughter.
From this it may be seen that when people begin to exalt with their praise men who are more excellent in name than in deeds, it is a difficult thing to contrive to bring such men down to their true level with words, however reasonable, before their own works, wholly contrary to their reputation, reveal what the masters so celebrated really are. And it is a very certain fact that the worst harm that one man can do to another is the giving of praise too early to any intellect engaged in work, since such praise, swelling him with premature pride, prevents him from going any farther, and a man so greatly extolled, on finding that his works have not that excellence which was expected, takes the censure too much to heart, and despairs completely of ever being able to do good work. Wise men, therefore, should fear praise much more than censure, for the first flatters and deceives, and the second, revealing the truth, gives instruction.
From this, it's clear that when people start praising individuals who are more impressive in name than in action, it becomes really hard to bring those individuals down to their true level with words, no matter how reasonable, until their work, which completely contradicts their reputation, shows who they really are. It's a definite fact that the worst harm one person can do to another is to give them praise too soon while they are working on something, because that praise fills them with premature pride, stopping them from progressing further. When someone is overly praised and then realizes their work doesn't live up to expectations, they take the criticism too personally and lose hope of ever producing good work. Therefore, wise people should be much more wary of praise than criticism, as praise flatters and misleads, while criticism, by revealing the truth, offers insight.
Boccaccino, then, departing from Rome, where he felt himself wounded and torn to pieces, returned to Cremona, and there continued to practise painting to the best of his power and knowledge. In the Duomo, over the arches in the middle, he painted all the stories of the Madonna; and this work is much esteemed in that city. He also made other works throughout that city and in the neighbourhood, of which there is no need to make mention.
Boccaccino, feeling hurt and broken after leaving Rome, went back to Cremona, where he continued to paint as well as he could. In the Duomo, above the arches in the center, he painted all the stories of the Madonna, and this piece is highly regarded in that city. He also created various other works throughout the city and its surroundings, but there's no need to mention them all.
He taught his art to a son of his own, called Camillo, who, applying himself to the art with more study, strove to make amends for the shortcomings of the boastful Boccaccino. By the hand of this Camillo are some works in S. Gismondo, which is a mile distant from Cremona; and these are esteemed by the people of Cremona as the best paintings that they have. He also painted the façade of a house on their Piazza, all the compartments of the vaulting and some panels in S. Agata, and the façade of S. Antonio, together with other works, which made him known as a practised master. If death had not snatched him from the world before his time, he would have achieved a most honourable success, for [Pg 60] he was advancing on the good way; and even for those works that he has left to us, he deserves to have record made of him.
He taught his craft to his son, Camillo, who dedicated himself to the art with greater effort, trying to address the faults of the boastful Boccaccino. Camillo created some works in S. Gismondo, which is about a mile from Cremona; these are regarded by the people of Cremona as their finest paintings. He also painted the front of a house in their Piazza, all the sections of the ceiling, and some panels in S. Agata, as well as the front of S. Antonio, among other works that established him as a skilled master. If death hadn't taken him too soon, he would have achieved great success, as [Pg 60] he was making good progress; and for the works he left behind, he deserves to be remembered.
But returning to Boccaccino; without having ever made any improvement in his art, he passed from this life at the age of fifty-eight. In his time there lived in Milan a passing good illuminator, called Girolamo, whose works may be seen in good numbers both in that city and throughout all Lombardy. A Milanese, likewise, living about the same time, was Bernardino del Lupino,[5] a very delicate and pleasing painter, as may be seen from many works by his hand that are in that city, and from a Marriage of Our Lady at Sarone, a place twelve miles distant from Milan, and other scenes that are in the Church of S. Maria, executed most perfectly in fresco. He also worked with a very high finish in oils, and he was a courteous person, and very liberal with his possessions; wherefore he deserves all the praise that is due to any craftsman who makes the works and ways of his daily life shine by the adornment of courtesy no less than do his works of art on account of their excellence.
But going back to Boccaccino; without ever improving his art, he left this world at the age of fifty-eight. During his time, there was a notably good illuminator in Milan named Girolamo, whose works can be found in good numbers both in that city and across all of Lombardy. Also from Milan, around the same period, was Bernardino del Lupino,[5] a very fine and attractive painter, evident from many of his works in that city, including a Marriage of Our Lady at Sarone, which is about twelve miles from Milan, and other scenes in the Church of S. Maria, executed perfectly in fresco. He also produced highly refined works in oils and was a polite person, very generous with his possessions; for this reason, he deserves all the praise that any craftsman receives for making the works and aspects of his daily life shine through courtesy, just as much as his art is praised for its excellence.

THE MARRIAGE OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Bernardino del Lupino [Luini].
Saronno:
Santuario della Beata Vergine)
Anderson
View larger image
THE MARRIAGE OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Bernardino del Lupino [Luini].
Saronno:
Santuario della Beata Vergine)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 61] BALDASSARRE PERUZZI
[Pg 63] LIFE OF BALDASSARRE PERUZZI
PAINTER AND ARCHITECT OF SIENA
Among all the gifts that Heaven distributes to mortals, none, in truth, can or should be held in more account than talent, with calmness and peace of soul, for the first makes us for ever immortal, and the second blessed. He, then, who is endowed with these gifts, in addition to the deep gratitude that he should feel towards God, must make himself known among other men almost as a light amid darkness. And even so, in our own times, did Baldassarre Peruzzi, a painter and architect of Siena, of whom we can say with certainty that the modesty and goodness which were revealed in him were no mean offshoots of that supreme serenity for which the minds of all who are born in this world are ever sighing, and that the works which he left to us are most honourable fruits of that true excellence which was infused in him by Heaven.
Among all the gifts that Heaven gives to people, none is more valuable than talent, paired with tranquility and peace of mind. Talent makes us immortal, while peace brings us joy. Therefore, someone who possesses these gifts, in addition to feeling deep gratitude towards God, should stand out among others like a light in the darkness. Even today, we can see this in Baldassarre Peruzzi, a painter and architect from Siena. We can confidently say that the humility and goodness he showed were true reflections of the profound serenity that everyone longs for in life, and the works he left behind are a testament to the true greatness that Heaven granted him.
Now, although I have called him above, Baldassarre of Siena, because he was always known as a Sienese, I will not withhold that even as seven cities contended for Homer, each claiming that he was her citizen, so three most noble cities of Tuscany—Florence, Volterra, and Siena—have each held that Baldassarre was her son. But, to tell the truth, each of them has a share in him, seeing that Antonio Peruzzi, a noble citizen of Florence, that city being harassed by civil war, went off, in the hope of a quieter life, to Volterra; and after living some time there, in the year 1482 he took a wife in that city, and in a few years had two children, one a boy, called Baldassarre, and the other a girl, who received the name of Virginia. Now it happened that war pursued this man who sought nothing but peace and quiet, and that no long time afterwards [Pg 64] Volterra was sacked; whence Antonio was forced to fly to Siena, and to live there in great poverty, having lost almost all that he had.
Now, even though I've referred to him as Baldassarre of Siena, since he was always recognized as a Sienese, I should mention that, just like seven cities argued over Homer, each claiming him as their own, three prominent cities in Tuscany—Florence, Volterra, and Siena—have all claimed Baldassarre as their own. However, the truth is that each of them has a stake in his legacy. Antonio Peruzzi, a noble citizen of Florence, left his city, troubled by civil war, in search of a quieter life in Volterra. After living there for a while, in 1482 he married in that city and eventually had two children: a son named Baldassarre and a daughter named Virginia. Unfortunately, war soon caught up with this man who only wanted peace, and not long after, [Pg 64] Volterra was invaded. As a result, Antonio was forced to flee to Siena, where he lived in great poverty, having lost almost everything he had.
Meanwhile Baldassarre, having grown up, was for ever associating with persons of ability, and particularly with goldsmiths and draughtsmen; and thus, beginning to take pleasure in the arts, he devoted himself heart and soul to drawing. And not long after, his father being now dead, he applied himself to painting with such zeal, that in a very short time he made marvellous progress therein, imitating living and natural things as well as the works of the best masters. In this way, executing what work he could find, he was able to maintain himself, his mother, and his sister with his art, and to pursue the studies of painting.
Meanwhile, Baldassarre, having grown up, began associating with talented people, especially goldsmiths and draftsmen. As he started to enjoy the arts, he fully committed himself to drawing. Not long after, with his father now deceased, he threw himself into painting with such enthusiasm that he made incredible progress in a very short time, capturing lifelike subjects and emulating the works of the greatest masters. By taking on any work he could find, he was able to support himself, his mother, and his sister through his art while continuing his studies in painting.

CUPOLA OF THE PONZETTI CHAPEL
(After the fresco by Baldassarre Peruzzi.
Rome: S. Maria della
Pace)
Anderson
View larger image
CUPOLA OF THE PONZETTI CHAPEL
(After the fresco by Baldassarre Peruzzi.
Rome: S. Maria della
Pace)
Anderson
View larger image
His first work—apart from some things at Siena, not worthy of mention—was in a little chapel near the Porta Fiorentina at Volterra, wherein he executed some figures with such grace, that they led to his forming a friendship with a painter of Volterra, called Piero, who lived most of his time in Rome, and going off with that master to that city, where he was doing some work in the Palace for Alexander VI. But after the death of Alexander, Maestro Piero working no more in that place, Baldassarre entered the workshop of the father of Maturino, a painter of no great excellence, who at that time had always plenty of work to do in the form of commonplace commissions. That painter, then, placing a panel primed with gesso before Baldassarre, but giving him no scrap of drawing or cartoon, told him to make a Madonna upon it. Baldassarre took a piece of charcoal, and in a moment, with great mastery, he had drawn what he wished to paint in the picture; and then, setting his hand to the colouring, in a few days he painted a picture so beautiful and so well finished, that it amazed not only the master of the workshop, but also many painters who saw it; and they, recognizing his ability, contrived to obtain for him the commission to paint the Chapel of the High-Altar in the Church of S. Onofrio, which he executed in fresco with much grace and in a very beautiful manner. After this, he painted two other little chapels in fresco in the Church of S. Rocco a Ripa. Having thus begun to be in good repute, he was summoned to Ostia, where he painted most beautiful scenes in chiaroscuro in some apartments of the great tower of [Pg 65] the fortress; in particular, a hand-to-hand battle after the manner in which the ancient Romans used to fight, and beside this a company of soldiers delivering an assault on a fortress, wherein the attackers, covered by their shields, are seen making a beautiful and spirited onslaught and planting their ladders against the walls, while the men within are hurling them back with the utmost fury. In this scene, also, he painted many antique instruments of war, and likewise various kinds of arms; with many other scenes in another hall, which are held to be among the best works that he ever made, although it is true that he was assisted in this work by Cesare da Milano.
His first work—aside from some minor pieces in Siena that aren't worth mentioning—was in a small chapel near the Porta Fiorentina in Volterra, where he created some figures with such elegance that it helped him form a friendship with a painter from Volterra named Piero, who spent most of his time in Rome. He went with Piero to the city, where Piero was working on some projects in the Palace for Alexander VI. However, after Alexander's death, Piero stopped working in that location, so Baldassarre joined the workshop of Maturino's father, a painter of limited skill who had plenty of routine commissions at that time. The painter, placing a gesso-primed panel in front of Baldassarre but giving him no drawings or sketches, asked him to create a Madonna on it. Baldassarre quickly picked up a piece of charcoal and, with great skill, drew what he intended to paint. Then, he started on the coloring, and within a few days, he painted a piece so beautiful and well-executed that it amazed not only the workshop master but also many artists who saw it. Recognizing his talent, they worked to secure him the commission for painting the High-Altar Chapel in the Church of S. Onofrio, which he completed in fresco with great elegance and beauty. Following this, he painted two other small chapels in fresco in the Church of S. Rocco a Ripa. With his reputation on the rise, he was called to Ostia, where he painted stunning chiaroscuro scenes in some rooms of the great tower of [Pg 65] the fortress; notably, a hand-to-hand battle reminiscent of how the ancient Romans would fight, and alongside it, a group of soldiers launching an assault on a fortress. In this scene, the attackers, shielded, are depicted making an impressive and spirited charge and positioning their ladders against the walls while the defenders are fiercely pushing them back. He also painted many ancient weapons and various types of arms, along with numerous other scenes in another hall, which are considered some of his best work, although it is true that he received help from Cesare da Milano during this project.
After these labours, having returned to Rome, Baldassarre formed a very strait friendship with Agostino Chigi of Siena, both because Agostino had a natural love for every man of talent, and because Baldassarre called himself a Sienese. And thus, with the help of so great a man, he was able to maintain himself while studying the antiquities of Rome, and particularly those in architecture, wherein, out of rivalry with Bramante, in a short time he made marvellous proficience, which afterwards brought him, as will be related, very great honour and profit. He also gave attention to perspective, and became such a master of that science, that we have seen few in our own times who have worked in it as well as he. Pope Julius II having meanwhile built a corridor in his Palace, with an aviary near the roof, Baldassarre painted there, in chiaroscuro, all the months of the year and the pursuits that are practised in each of them. In this work may be seen an endless number of buildings, theatres, amphitheatres, palaces, and other edifices, all distributed with beautiful invention in that place. He then painted, in company with other painters, some apartments in the Palace of S. Giorgio for Cardinal Raffaello Riario, Bishop of Ostia; and he painted a façade opposite to the house of Messer Ulisse da Fano, and also that of the same Messer Ulisse, wherein he executed stories of Ulysses that brought him very great renown and fame.
After these efforts, upon returning to Rome, Baldassarre formed a close friendship with Agostino Chigi of Siena, both because Agostino had a natural appreciation for talented individuals and because Baldassarre identified as a Sienese. With the support of such an influential man, he was able to sustain himself while studying the antiquities of Rome, especially in architecture, where, in competition with Bramante, he quickly made remarkable progress, which later led to him, as will be mentioned, significant honor and profit. He also focused on perspective and became such a master of that field that few in our time have worked in it as skillfully as he did. Meanwhile, Pope Julius II had a corridor built in his Palace, complete with an aviary near the roof, where Baldassarre painted, in chiaroscuro, all the months of the year and the activities associated with each. In this work, one can see an endless array of buildings, theaters, amphitheaters, palaces, and other structures, all arranged with beautiful creativity in that space. He then collaborated with other painters to decorate some rooms in the Palace of S. Giorgio for Cardinal Raffaello Riario, Bishop of Ostia; he also painted a façade across from the house of Messer Ulisse da Fano, as well as that of the same Messer Ulisse, where he depicted stories of Ulysses that earned him considerable fame and recognition.
Even greater was the fame that came to him from the model of the Palace of Agostino Chigi, executed with such beautiful grace that it seems not to have been built, but rather to have sprung into life; and [Pg 66] with his own hand he decorated the exterior with most beautiful scenes in terretta. The hall, likewise, is adorned with rows of columns executed in perspective, which, with the depth of the intercolumniation, cause it to appear much larger. But what is the greatest marvel of all is a loggia that may be seen over the garden, painted by Baldassarre with scenes of the Medusa turning men into stone, such that nothing more beautiful can be imagined; and then there is Perseus cutting off her head, with many other scenes in the spandrels of that vaulting, while the ornamentation, drawn in perspective with colours, in imitation of stucco, is so natural and lifelike, that even to excellent craftsmen it appears to be in relief. And I remember that when I took the Chevalier Tiziano, a most excellent and honoured painter, to see that work, he would by no means believe that it was painted, until he had changed his point of view, when he was struck with amazement. In that place are some works executed by Fra Sebastiano Viniziano, in his first manner; and by the hand of the divine Raffaello, as has been related, there is a Galatea being carried off by sea-gods.
Even more captivating was the fame he gained from the model of the Palace of Agostino Chigi, crafted with such beauty that it seems to have come to life rather than been built. With his own hand, he decorated the exterior with stunning scenes in terretta. The hall, too, is adorned with rows of columns created in perspective, which, along with the depth of the spaces between them, makes it look much larger. But the greatest marvel is a loggia overlooking the garden, painted by Baldassarre with scenes of Medusa turning men into stone, so beautiful that it's hard to imagine anything better. Then there's Perseus cutting off her head, along with many other scenes in the spandrels of that vaulted ceiling, while the decoration, drawn in perspective with colors mimicking stucco, is so natural and lifelike that even skilled craftsmen find it looks three-dimensional. I recall taking the Chevalier Tiziano, an esteemed and honored painter, to see that work; he could hardly believe it was painted until he changed his viewpoint and was left in awe. In that place, there are also works by Fra Sebastiano Viniziano in his early style, and by the divine Raffaello, as previously mentioned, there is a Galatea being taken away by sea gods.

PALAZZO DELLA FARNESINA
(After Baldassarre Peruzzi.
Rome)
Alinari
View larger image
PALAZZO DELLA FARNESINA
(After Baldassarre Peruzzi.
Rome)
Alinari
View larger image
Baldassarre also painted, beyond the Campo di Fiore, on the way to the Piazza Giudea, a most beautiful façade in terretta with marvellous perspectives, for which he received the commission from a Groom of the Chamber to the Pope; and it is now in the possession of Jacopo Strozzi, the Florentine. In like manner, he wrought for Messer Ferrando Ponzetti, who afterwards became a Cardinal, a chapel at the entrance of the Church of the Pace, on the left hand, with little scenes from the Old Testament, and also with some figures of considerable size; and for a work in fresco this is executed with much diligence. But even more did he prove his worth in painting and perspective near the high-altar of the same church, where he painted a scene for Messer Filippo da Siena, Clerk of the Chamber, of Our Lady going into the Temple, ascending the steps, with many figures worthy of praise, such as a gentleman in antique dress, who, having dismounted from his horse, with his servants waiting, is giving alms to a beggar, quite naked and very wretched, who may be seen asking him for it with pitiful humility. In this place, also, are various buildings and most beautiful ornaments; and right round [Pg 67] the whole work, executed likewise in fresco, are counterfeited decorations of stucco, which have the appearance of being attached to the wall with large rings, as if it were a panel painted in oils.
Baldassarre also painted, beyond the Campo di Fiore, on the way to the Piazza Giudea, a stunning façade in terretta with amazing perspectives, for which he got the commission from a Groom of the Chamber to the Pope; and it is now owned by Jacopo Strozzi, the Florentine. Likewise, he created for Messer Ferrando Ponzetti, who later became a Cardinal, a chapel at the entrance of the Church of the Pace, on the left side, featuring small scenes from the Old Testament, along with some large figures; and for a fresco, this was done with great care. But he really showcased his talent in painting and perspective near the high altar of the same church, where he painted a scene for Messer Filippo da Siena, Clerk of the Chamber, of Our Lady entering the Temple, climbing the steps, with many praiseworthy figures, such as a gentleman in ancient dress, who, after dismounting from his horse, with his servants waiting, is giving alms to a beggar, completely naked and very miserable, who can be seen humbly asking him for it. In this area, there are also various buildings and beautiful decorations; and all around [Pg 67] the whole work, also done in fresco, are imitations of stucco decorations that look like they are attached to the wall with large rings, as if it were a panel painted in oils.
And in the magnificent festival that the Roman people prepared on the Campidoglio when the baton of Holy Church was given to Duke Giuliano de' Medici, out of six painted scenes which were executed by six different painters of eminence, that by the hand of Baldassarre, twenty-eight braccia high and fourteen broad, showing the betrayal of the Romans by Julia Tarpeia, was judged to be without a doubt better than any of the others. But what amazed everyone most was the perspective-view or scenery for a play, which was so beautiful that it would be impossible to imagine anything finer, seeing that the variety and beautiful manner of the buildings, the various loggie, the extravagance of the doors and windows, and the other architectural details that were seen in it, were so well conceived and so extraordinary in invention, that one is not able to describe the thousandth part.
And at the grand festival that the Roman people organized on the Campidoglio when the leadership of the Holy Church was handed over to Duke Giuliano de' Medici, one of the six painted scenes created by different renowned painters stood out: Baldassarre's piece, which measured twenty-eight braccia tall and fourteen braccia wide, depicting the betrayal of the Romans by Julia Tarpeia, was unanimously regarded as the best. However, what astonished everyone the most was the perspective scenery designed for a play. It was so stunning that it was hard to imagine anything better, considering the variety and beauty of the buildings, the different loggies, the elaborate doors and windows, and the other architectural details showcased in it, which were conceived so well and were so extraordinary that it’s impossible to describe even a fraction of it.
For the house of Messer Francesco di Norcia, on the Piazza de' Farnesi, he made a very graceful door of the Doric Order; and for Messer Francesco Buzio he executed, near the Piazza degl' Altieri, a very beautiful façade, in the frieze of which he painted portraits from life of all the Roman Cardinals who were then alive, while on the wall itself he depicted the scenes of Cæsar receiving tribute from all the world, and above he painted the twelve Emperors, who are standing upon certain corbels, being foreshortened with a view to being seen from below, and wrought with extraordinary art. For this whole work he rightly obtained vast commendation. In the Banchi he executed the escutcheon of Pope Leo, with three children, that seemed to be alive, so tender was their flesh. For Fra Mariano Fetti, Friar of the Piombo, he made a very beautiful S. Bernard in terretta in his garden at Montecavallo. And for the Company of S. Catherine of Siena, on the Strada Giulia, in addition to a bier for carrying the dead to burial, he executed many other things, all worthy of praise. In Siena, also, he gave the design for the organ of the Carmine; and he made some other works in that city, but none of much importance.
For Messer Francesco di Norcia’s house on Piazza de’ Farnesi, he created a beautifully designed Doric door. He also crafted an impressive façade for Messer Francesco Buzio near Piazza degl' Altieri, where he painted lifelike portraits of all the Roman Cardinals who were alive at that time in the frieze. On the wall, he depicted scenes of Caesar receiving tribute from around the world, and above, he painted the twelve Emperors, positioned on corbels so that they could be viewed from below, rendered with exceptional skill. He justly received immense praise for this entire work. In the Banchi, he created Pope Leo's escutcheon with three children that looked so lifelike, their skin seemed almost real. For Fra Mariano Fetti, the Friar of the Piombo, he sculpted a lovely St. Bernard in terracotta for his garden at Montecavallo. Additionally, for the Company of St. Catherine of Siena on Strada Giulia, he executed a bier for transporting the deceased, along with many other commendable pieces. In Siena, he also designed the organ for the Carmine and produced some other works in that city, although none were particularly significant.
[Pg 68] Later, having been summoned to Bologna by the Wardens of Works of S. Petronio, to the end that he might make the model for the façade of that church, he made for this two large ground-plans and two elevations, one in the modern manner and the other in the German; and the latter is still preserved in the Sacristy of the same S. Petronio, as a truly extraordinary work, since he drew that building in such sharply-detailed perspective that it appears to be in relief. In the house of Count Giovan Battista Bentivogli, in the same city, he made several drawings for the aforesaid structure, which were so beautiful, that it is not possible to praise enough the wonderful expedients sought out by this man in order not to destroy the old masonry, but to join it in beautiful proportion with the new. For the Count Giovan Battista mentioned above he made the design of a Nativity with the Magi, in chiaroscuro, wherein it is a marvellous thing to see the horses, the equipage, and the courts of the three Kings, executed with supreme beauty and grace, as are also the walls of the temples and some buildings round the hut. This work was afterwards given to be coloured by the Count to Girolamo Trevigi, who brought it to fine completion. Baldassarre also made the design for the door of the Church of S. Michele in Bosco, a most beautiful monastery of the Monks of Monte Oliveto, without Bologna; and the design and model of the Duomo of Carpi, which was very beautiful, and was built under his direction according to the rules of Vitruvius. And in the same place he made a beginning with the Church of S. Niccola, but it was not finished at that time, because Baldassarre was almost forced to return to Siena in order to make designs for the fortifications of that city, which were afterwards carried into execution under his supervision.
[Pg 68] Later, he was called to Bologna by the Wardens of Works of S. Petronio to create a model for the church's façade. He produced two large ground-plans and two elevations—one in a modern style and the other in a German style—of which the latter is still kept in the Sacristy of S. Petronio. It's considered an extraordinary piece because he depicted the building in such detailed perspective that it looks three-dimensional. At the house of Count Giovan Battista Bentivogli in the same city, he created several drawings for this structure, which were so beautiful that it's hard to overstate the impressive solutions he devised to connect the old masonry with the new in a harmonious way. For Count Giovan Battista, he also designed a Nativity scene featuring the Magi, using chiaroscuro, highlighting the horses, the carriages, and the courts of the three Kings with remarkable beauty and elegance, as well as the walls of the temples and some buildings around the hut. This work was later colored by Girolamo Trevigi, who finished it beautifully. Baldassarre also designed the door for the Church of S. Michele in Bosco, a lovely monastery for the Monks of Monte Oliveto, located outside Bologna, and he created the design and model for the Duomo of Carpi, which was very beautiful and constructed under his guidance according to Vitruvius’s principles. He also started work on the Church of S. Niccola there, but it wasn’t completed at that time because Baldassarre was nearly required to return to Siena to design fortifications for that city, which were eventually built under his supervision.
He then returned to Rome, where, after building the house that is opposite to the Farnese Palace, with some others within that city, he was employed in many works by Pope Leo X. That Pontiff wished to finish the building of S. Pietro, begun by Julius II after the design of Bramante, but it appeared to him that the edifice was too large and lacking in cohesion; and Baldassarre made a new model, magnificent and truly ingenious, and revealing such good judgment, that some parts of it have since been used by other architects. So diligent, indeed, was [Pg 69] this craftsman, so rare and so beautiful his judgment, and such the method with which his buildings were always designed, that he has never had an equal in works of architecture, seeing that, in addition to his other gifts, he combined that profession with a good and beautiful manner of painting. He made the design of the tomb of Adrian VI, and all that is painted round it is by his hand; and Michelagnolo, a sculptor of Siena, executed that tomb in marble, with the help of our Baldassarre.
He then went back to Rome, where, after building the house across from the Farnese Palace and several others in the city, he worked on many projects for Pope Leo X. The Pope wanted to complete the construction of St. Peter's, which was started by Julius II based on Bramante's design, but thought the building was too big and not cohesive enough. Baldassarre created a new model that was impressive and truly innovative, showing such good judgment that some elements of it have since been used by other architects. This craftsman was incredibly diligent, with such unique and beautiful insights in his designs that he has never been matched in architectural works. In addition to his other talents, he combined his architectural skills with a smooth and lovely style of painting. He designed the tomb of Adrian VI, and everything painted around it was done by him, while Michelangelo, a sculptor from Siena, carved the tomb in marble with Baldassarre's assistance.
When the Calandra, a play by Cardinal Bibbiena, was performed before the same Pope Leo, Baldassarre made the scenic setting, which was no less beautiful—much more so, indeed—than that which he had made on another occasion, as has been related above. In such works he deserved all the greater praise, because dramatic performances, and consequently the scenery for them, had been out of fashion for a long time, festivals and sacred representations taking their place. And either before or after (it matters little which) the performance of the aforesaid Calandra, which was one of the first plays in the vulgar tongue to be seen or performed, in the time of Leo X, Baldassarre made two such scenes, which were marvellous, and opened the way to those who have since made them in our own day. Nor is it possible to imagine how he found room, in a space so limited, for so many streets, so many palaces, and so many bizarre temples, loggie, and various kinds of cornices, all so well executed that it seemed that they were not counterfeited, but absolutely real, and that the piazza was not a little thing, and merely painted, but real and very large. He designed, also, the chandeliers and the lights within that illuminated the scene, and all the other things that were necessary, with much judgment, although, as has been related, the drama had fallen almost completely out of fashion. This kind of spectacle, in my belief, when it has all its accessories, surpasses any other kind, however sumptuous and magnificent.
When the *Calandra*, a play by Cardinal Bibbiena, was performed for Pope Leo, Baldassarre created a set that was just as stunning—indeed, even more so—than the one he had made before, as mentioned earlier. He truly deserved extra praise for such works, especially since dramatic performances and their accompanying scenery had been out of style for a long time, replaced by festivals and religious shows. Around the same time as the performance of *Calandra*, one of the first plays in common language to be seen or performed during Leo X's reign, Baldassarre created two amazing sets that paved the way for future productions in our time. It's hard to believe how he managed to fit so many streets, palaces, and unique temples, loggias, and various types of cornices into such a limited space, all crafted so well that they looked real rather than fake, making the piazza appear not just small and painted, but real and expansive. He also designed the chandeliers and lights that illuminated the scene, along with all other essentials, with great skill, even though, as mentioned, drama had nearly fallen out of favor. In my opinion, this type of spectacle, when it includes all its elements, surpasses any other kind, no matter how lavish or grand.
Afterwards, at the election of Pope Clement VII in the year 1524, he prepared the festivities for his coronation. He finished with peperino-stone the front of the principal chapel, formerly begun by Bramante, in S. Pietro; and in the chapel wherein is the bronze tomb of Pope Sixtus, [Pg 70] he painted in chiaroscuro the Apostles that are in the niches behind the altar, besides making the design of the Tabernacle of the Sacrament, which is very graceful.
Afterwards, with the election of Pope Clement VII in 1524, he organized the celebrations for his coronation. He completed the façade of the main chapel, which had previously been started by Bramante, in S. Pietro using peperino stone; and in the chapel that contains the bronze tomb of Pope Sixtus, [Pg 70] he painted the Apostles in chiaroscuro in the niches behind the altar, in addition to creating the design for the Tabernacle of the Sacrament, which is quite elegant.
Then in the year 1527, when the cruel sack of Rome took place, our poor Baldassarre was taken prisoner by the Spaniards, and not only lost all his possessions, but was also much maltreated and outraged, because he was grave, noble, and gracious of aspect, and they believed him to be some great prelate in disguise, or some other man able to pay a fat ransom. Finally, however, those impious barbarians having found that he was a painter, one of them, who had borne a great affection to Bourbon, caused him to make a portrait of that most rascally captain, the enemy of God and man, either letting Baldassarre see him as he lay dead, or giving him his likeness in some other way, with drawings or with words. After this, having slipped from their hands, Baldassarre took ship to go to Porto Ercole, and thence to Siena; but on the way he was robbed of everything and stripped to such purpose, that he went to Siena in his shirt. However, he was received with honour and reclothed by his friends, and a little time afterwards he was given a provision and a salary by the Commonwealth, to the end that he might give his attention to the fortification of that city. Living there, he had two children; and, besides what he did for the public service, he made many designs of houses for his fellow-citizens, and the design for the ornament of the organ, which is very beautiful, in the Church of the Carmine.
Then in 1527, during the brutal sack of Rome, our poor Baldassarre was captured by the Spaniards. He not only lost all his belongings but was also badly mistreated because of his serious, noble, and distinguished appearance. They thought he might be a high-ranking church official in disguise or someone who could pay a hefty ransom. Eventually, those ruthless barbarians discovered he was a painter, and one of them, who had a strong admiration for Bourbon, compelled Baldassarre to create a portrait of that treacherous captain, the enemy of both God and mankind. They either showed him how Bourbon looked while he was dead or provided him with his likeness in some other way, through drawings or descriptions. After managing to escape from them, Baldassarre boarded a ship heading to Porto Ercole, and then to Siena; but on the journey, he was robbed of everything and left in such a state that he arrived in Siena wearing only his shirt. However, he was welcomed with honor and provided with clothing by his friends, and shortly after, he received support and a salary from the Commonwealth to focus on fortifying the city. While living there, he had two children, and in addition to his public service, he created many designs for houses for his fellow citizens, as well as a beautiful design for the organ adornment in the Church of the Carmine.

COURTYARD OF PALAZZO MASSIMI
(After Baldassarre Peruzzi. Rome)
Anderson
View larger image
COURTYARD OF PALAZZO MASSIMI
(After Baldassarre Peruzzi. Rome)
Anderson
View larger image
Meanwhile, the armies of the Emperor and the Pope had advanced to the siege of Florence, and his Holiness sent Baldassarre to the camp to Baccio Valori, the Military Commissary, to the end that Baccio might avail himself of his services for the purposes of his operations and for the capture of the city. But Baldassarre, loving the liberty of his former country more than the favour of the Pope, and in no way fearing the indignation of so great a Pontiff, would never lend his aid in any matter of importance. The Pope, hearing of this, for a short time bore him no little ill-will; but when the war was finished, Baldassarre desiring to return to Rome, Cardinals Salviati, Trivulzi, and Cesarino, to all of whom he had given faithful service in many works, restored him to the favour [Pg 71] of the Pope and to his former appointments. He was thus able to return without hindrance to Rome, where, not many days after, he made for the Signori Orsini the designs of two very beautiful palaces, which were built on the way to Viterbo, and of some other edifices for Apuglia. But meanwhile he did not neglect the studies of astrology, nor those of mathematics and the others in which he much delighted, and he began a book on the antiquities of Rome, with a commentary on Vitruvius, making little by little illustrative drawings beside the writings of that author, some of which are still to be seen in the possession of Francesco da Siena, who was his disciple, and among them some papers with drawings of ancient edifices and of the modern manner of building.
Meanwhile, the armies of the Emperor and the Pope had moved in to lay siege to Florence. The Pope sent Baldassarre to the camp to meet with Baccio Valori, the Military Commissary, so that Baccio could use his services for the operations and the capture of the city. However, Baldassarre valued the freedom of his homeland more than the Pope's favor, and he was not afraid of the anger of such a high-ranking Pontiff. He refused to assist in any significant matters. When the Pope learned of this, he was annoyed with Baldassarre for a time. But after the war was over, Baldassarre wanted to return to Rome. Cardinals Salviati, Trivulzi, and Cesarino—who had all benefited from his faithful service in various projects—helped him regain the Pope's favor and his previous positions. He was then able to return to Rome without any issues, where shortly after, he designed two beautiful palaces for the Signori Orsini, which were built on the way to Viterbo, as well as some other buildings in Apuglia. Meanwhile, he continued to study astrology, mathematics, and other subjects he loved. He began writing a book on the antiquities of Rome, along with a commentary on Vitruvius, creating illustrations alongside the writings of that author, some of which can still be seen today in the possession of Francesco da Siena, his disciple, including papers with drawings of ancient buildings and modern architectural styles.
While living in Rome, also, he made the design for the house of the Massimi, drawn in an oval form, with a new and beautiful manner of building; and for the façade he made a vestibule of Doric columns showing great art and good proportion, with a beautiful distribution of detail in the court and in the disposition of the stairs; but he was not able to see this work finished, for he was overtaken by death.
While living in Rome, he also designed the Massimi house, which had an oval shape and featured a fresh and beautiful style of architecture. For the facade, he created a vestibule with Doric columns that displayed great skill and good proportions, along with a lovely arrangement of details in the courtyard and the layout of the stairs. However, he was unable to see this project completed because he passed away.
And yet, although the talents and labours of this noble craftsman were so great, they brought much more benefit to others than to himself; for, while he was employed by Popes, Cardinals, and other great and rich persons, not one of them ever gave him any remarkable reward. That this should have happened is not surprising, not so much through want of liberality in such patrons, although for the most part they are least liberal where they should be the very opposite, as through the timidity and excessive modesty, or rather, to be more exact in this case, the lack of shrewdness of Baldassarre. To tell the truth, in proportion as one should be discreet with magnanimous and liberal Princes, so should one always be pressing and importunate with such as are miserly, unthankful, and discourteous, for the reason that, even as in the case of the generous importunate asking would always be a vice, so with the miserly it is a virtue, and with such men it is discretion that would be the vice.
And yet, even though this talented craftsman worked incredibly hard, his efforts benefited others way more than himself. While he was employed by Popes, Cardinals, and other wealthy people, none of them ever gave him any significant rewards. It’s not surprising this happened, not just because those patrons were generally not very generous—though they often should be—but also because of Baldassarre’s shyness and excessive modesty, or more accurately, his lack of cunning. Honestly, while one should be discreet with generous and open-minded princes, with people who are stingy, ungrateful, and rude, you have to be persistent and a bit pushy. In the case of the generous, being too pushy is a fault, but with the stingy, it’s actually a virtue, and with such people, discretion becomes the fault.
In the last years of his life, then, Baldassarre found himself poor and weighed down by his family. Finally, having always lived a life without reproach, he fell grievously ill, and took to his bed; and Pope [Pg 72] Paul III, hearing this, and recognizing too late the harm that he was like to suffer in the loss of so great a man, sent Jacopo Melighi, the accountant of S. Pietro, to give him a present of one hundred crowns, and to make him most friendly offers. However, his sickness increased, either because it was so ordained, or, as many believe, because his death was hastened with poison by some rival who desired his place, from which he drew two hundred and fifty crowns of salary; and, the physicians discovering this too late, he died, very unwilling to give up his life, more on account of his poor family than for his own sake, as he thought in what sore straits he was leaving them. He was much lamented by his children and his friends, and he received honourable burial, next to Raffaello da Urbino, in the Ritonda, whither he was followed by all the painters, sculptors, and architects of Rome, doing him honour and bewailing him; with the following epitaph:
In the final years of his life, Baldassarre found himself struggling financially and burdened by his family. After living a life without blame, he fell seriously ill and went to bed. Pope [Pg 72] Paul III, hearing about this and realizing too late the loss they would suffer without such a great man, sent Jacopo Melighi, the accountant of S. Pietro, to gift him one hundred crowns and offer friendly support. Unfortunately, his illness worsened, either by fate or, as many believe, due to being poisoned by a rival who wanted his position, from which he earned two hundred and fifty crowns. The doctors discovered this too late, and he died reluctantly, more worried about leaving his family in dire straits than for his own sake. His children and friends mourned him greatly, and he was given an honorable burial next to Raffaello da Urbino in the Ritonda, attended by all the painters, sculptors, and architects of Rome, who came to pay their respects and grieve for him, with the following epitaph:
BALTHASARI PERUTIO SENENSI, VIRO ET PICTURA ET ARCHITECTURA
ALIISQUE INGENIORUM ARTIBUS ADEO EXCELLENTI, UT SI PRISCORUM
OCCUBUISSET TEMPORIBUS, NOSTRA ILLUM FELICIUS LEGERENT. VIX.
ANN. LV, MENS. XI, DIES XX.
LUCRETIA ET JO. SALUSTIUS OPTIMO CONJUGI ET PARENTI, NON SINE LACRIMIS
SIMONIS, HONORII, CLAUDII, ÆMILIÆ, AC SULPITIÆ, MINORUM FILIORUM,
DOLENTES POSUERUNT, DIE IIII JANUARII, MDXXXVI.
BALTHASARI PERUTIO SENENSI, A MAN EXCEPTIONAL IN BOTH PAINTING AND ARCHITECTURE
AND OTHER FINE ARTS, SO TALENTED THAT IF HE HAD LIVED IN ANCIENT TIMES,
PEOPLE WOULD HAVE READ HIM WITH EVEN GREATER ADMIRATION. JUST.
YEAR 1555, MONTH XI, DAY 20.
LUCRETIA AND JO. SALUSTIUS, TO THEIR BELOVED HUSBAND AND FATHER, NOT WITHOUT TEARS
FROM SIMONIS, HONORII, CLAUDII, ÆMILIÆ, AND SULPITIÆ, THE YOUNGER SONS,
PLACED THIS ON THE 4TH OF JANUARY, 1536.
The name and fame of Baldassarre became greater after his death than they had been during his lifetime; and then, above all, was his talent missed, when Pope Paul III resolved to have S. Pietro finished, because men recognized how great a help he would have been to Antonio da San Gallo. For, although Antonio had to his credit all that is to be seen executed by him, yet it is believed that in company with Baldassarre he would have done more towards solving some of the difficulties of that work. The heir to many of the possessions of Baldassarre was Sebastiano Serlio of Bologna, who wrote the third book on architecture and the fourth on the antiquities of Rome with their measurements; in which works the above-mentioned labours of Baldassarre were partly inserted in the margins, and partly turned to great advantage by the author. Most of these writings of Baldassarre came into the hands of Jacomo Melighino of Ferrara, who was afterwards chosen by Pope Paul as architect [Pg 73] for his buildings, and of the aforesaid Francesco da Siena, his former assistant and disciple, by whose hand is the highly renowned escutcheon of Cardinal Trani in Piazza Navona, with some other works. From this Francesco we received the portrait of Baldassarre, and information about some matters which I was not able to ascertain when this book was published for the first time. Another disciple of Baldassarre was Virgilio Romano, who executed a façade with some prisoners in sgraffito-work in the centre of the Borgo Nuovo in his native city, and many other beautiful works. From the same master, also, Antonio del Rozzo, a citizen of Siena and a very excellent engineer, learnt the first principles of architecture; and Baldassarre was followed, in like manner, by Riccio, a painter of Siena, who, however, afterwards imitated to no small extent the manner of Giovanni Antonio Sodoma of Vercelli. And another of his pupils was Giovan Battista Peloro, an architect of Siena, who gave much attention to mathematics and cosmography, and made with his own hand mariner's compasses, quadrants, many irons and instruments for measuring, and likewise the ground-plans of many fortifications, most of which are in the possession of Maestro Giuliano, a goldsmith of Siena, who was very much his friend. This Giovan Battista made for Duke Cosimo de' Medici a plan of Siena, all in relief and altogether marvellous, with the valleys and the surroundings for a mile and a half round—the walls, the streets, the forts, and, in a word, a most beautiful model of the whole place. But, since he was unstable by nature, he left Duke Cosimo, although he had a good allowance from that Prince; and, thinking to do better, he made his way into France, where he followed the Court without any success for a long time, and finally died at Avignon. And although he was an able and well-practised architect, yet in no place are there to be seen any buildings erected by him or after his design, for he always stayed such a short time in any one place, that he could never bring anything to completion; wherefore he consumed all his time with designs, measurements, models, and caprices. Nevertheless, as a follower of our arts, he has deserved to have record made of him.
The name and reputation of Baldassarre grew even more after his death than during his life; his talent was especially missed when Pope Paul III made the decision to complete S. Pietro, as people realized how much he would have helped Antonio da San Gallo. Although Antonio accomplished much of the work we see credited to him, it's believed that alongside Baldassarre, he could have resolved some of the challenges of that project more effectively. The heir to many of Baldassarre's possessions was Sebastiano Serlio from Bologna, who authored the third book on architecture and the fourth on the antiquities of Rome with their measurements. In these works, some of Baldassarre's contributions were included in the margins and effectively utilized by the author. Most of Baldassarre's writings were passed to Jacomo Melighino from Ferrara, who was later appointed by Pope Paul as architect [Pg 73] for his projects, and to Francesco da Siena, Baldassarre's earlier assistant and student, who created the famous coat of arms for Cardinal Trani in Piazza Navona, along with other works. From Francesco, we obtained the portrait of Baldassarre and details about some topics I couldn't confirm when this book was first published. Another student of Baldassarre was Virgilio Romano, who created a façade featuring prisoners in sgraffito in the center of Borgo Nuovo in his hometown, along with many other beautiful works. Antonio del Rozzo, a citizen of Siena and a talented engineer, also learned the fundamentals of architecture from Baldassarre. Similarly, Riccio, a Siena painter, followed Baldassarre's teachings but later heavily imitated the style of Giovanni Antonio Sodoma from Vercelli. Another of his pupils was Giovan Battista Peloro, an architect from Siena who focused on mathematics and cosmography. He crafted mariner's compasses, quadrants, and various measuring tools, as well as plans for many fortifications, most of which are now with Maestro Giuliano, a goldsmith from Siena and a close friend of his. Giovan Battista created a remarkable relief map of Siena for Duke Cosimo de' Medici, illustrating the valleys and surroundings up to a mile and a half around—the walls, streets, forts, and an overall stunning model of the entire area. However, due to his restless nature, he left Duke Cosimo despite receiving a good salary from him. Hoping for better opportunities, he traveled to France, where he spent a long time following the Court without success, eventually dying in Avignon. Although he was a skilled and experienced architect, there are no buildings to see that were constructed by him or based on his designs, as he never stayed in one place long enough to finish anything. Instead, he spent all his time on designs, measurements, models, and whims. Nevertheless, as a supporter of our arts, he deserves to be remembered.
Baldassarre drew very well in every manner, with great judgment and diligence, but more with the pen, in water-colours, and in chiaroscuro, [Pg 74] than in any other way, as may be seen from many drawings by his hand that belong to different craftsmen. Our book, in particular, contains various drawings; and in one of these is a scene full of invention and caprice, showing a piazza filled with arches, colossal figures, theatres, obelisks, pyramids, temples of various kinds, porticoes, and other things, all after the antique, while on a pedestal stands a Mercury, round whom are all sorts of alchemists with bellows large and small, retorts, and other instruments for distilling, hurrying about and giving him a clyster in order to purge his body—an invention as ludicrous as it is beautiful and bizarre.
Baldassarre was excellent at drawing in every way, with great skill and dedication, but he excelled particularly with the pen, in watercolors, and in chiaroscuro, [Pg 74] more than in any other medium, as can be seen in many of his drawings that belong to various artists. Our book, in particular, features several drawings; one of these depicts an imaginative and whimsical scene showing a piazza filled with arches, gigantic figures, theaters, obelisks, pyramids, various temples, porticoes, and more, all styled after the classics. In the center, on a pedestal, stands a Mercury, surrounded by all sorts of alchemists with large and small bellows, retorts, and other distillation tools, rushing around and administering an enema to purge his body—an idea that is as funny as it is beautiful and strange.
Friends and intimate companions of Baldassarre, who was always courteous, modest, and gentle with every man, were Domenico Beccafumi of Siena, an excellent painter, and Il Capanna, who, in addition to many other works that he painted in Siena, executed the façade of the house of the Turchi and another that is on the Piazza.
Friends and close companions of Baldassarre, who was consistently polite, humble, and kind to everyone, included Domenico Beccafumi from Siena, a fantastic painter, and Il Capanna, who, alongside many other pieces he created in Siena, worked on the façade of the Turchi's house and another one located in the Piazza.
[Pg 75] GIOVAN FRANCESCO PENNI OF FLORENCE AND PELLEGRINO DA MODENA
[Pg 77] LIVES OF GIOVAN FRANCESCO PENNI OF FLORENCE
[CALLED IL FATTORE]
AND OF PELLEGRINO DA MODENA
PAINTERS
Giovan Francesco Penni, called Il Fattore, a painter of Florence, was no less indebted to Fortune than he was to the goodness of his own nature, in that his ways of life, his inclination for painting, and his other qualities brought it about that Raffaello da Urbino took him into his house and educated him together with Giulio Romano, looking on both of them ever afterwards as his children, and proving at his death how much he thought both of the one and of the other by leaving them heirs to his art and to his property alike. Now Giovan Francesco, who began from his boyhood, when he first entered the house of Raffaello, to be called Il Fattore, and always retained that name, imitated in his drawings the manner of Raffaello, and never ceased to follow it, as may be perceived from some drawings by his hand that are in our book. And it is nothing wonderful that there should be many of these to be seen, all finished with great diligence, because he delighted much more in drawing than in colouring.
Giovan Francesco Penni, known as Il Fattore, a painter from Florence, was just as lucky as he was talented. His lifestyle, passion for painting, and other qualities led Raffaello da Urbino to take him in and educate him alongside Giulio Romano, viewing both of them as his own children. At his death, Raffaello clearly showed how much he valued both by leaving them as heirs to his art and his property. Giovan Francesco, who had been called Il Fattore since he was a boy when he first entered Raffaello's home, consistently imitated Raffaello's style in his drawings and never stopped following it, as evident from several of his drawings that are included in our book. It's not surprising that there are many of these drawings, all completed with great care, because he found much more joy in drawing than in coloring.
The first works of Giovan Francesco were executed by him in the Papal Loggie at Rome, in company with Giovanni da Udine, Perino del Vaga, and other excellent masters; and in these may be seen a marvellous grace, worthy of a master striving at perfection of workmanship. He was very versatile, and he delighted much in making landscapes and buildings. He was a good colourist in oils, in fresco, and in distemper, and made excellent portraits from life; and he was much assisted in every respect by nature, so that he gained great mastery over all the [Pg 78] secrets of art without much study. He was a great help to Raffaello, therefore, in painting a large part of the cartoons for the tapestries of the Pope's Chapel and of the Consistory, and particularly the ornamental borders. He also executed many other things from the cartoons and directions of Raffaello, such as the ceiling for Agostino Chigi in the Trastevere, with many pictures, panels, and various other works, in which he acquitted himself so well, that every day he won greater affection from Raffaello. On the Monte Giordano, in Rome, he painted a façade in chiaroscuro, and in S. Maria de Anima, by the side-door that leads to the Pace, a S. Christopher in fresco, eight braccia high, which is a very good figure; and in this work is a hermit with a lantern in his hand, in a grotto, executed with good draughtsmanship, harmony, and grace.
The first works of Giovan Francesco were created by him in the Papal Loggie at Rome, alongside Giovanni da Udine, Perino del Vaga, and other talented masters. In these works, one can see a remarkable grace, deserving of a master aiming for perfection in craftsmanship. He was very versatile and enjoyed creating landscapes and architecture. He was skilled in using oils, fresco, and distemper, and he produced excellent portraits from life. Nature greatly aided him, allowing him to master all the [Pg 78] secrets of art without extensive study. He was a significant asset to Raffaello, helping paint much of the cartoons for the Pope's Chapel and the Consistory's tapestries, especially the decorative borders. He also worked on numerous other projects based on Raffaello's cartoons and directions, such as the ceiling for Agostino Chigi in Trastevere, which included many pictures, panels, and various other pieces, where he excelled so well that he earned more affection from Raffaello every day. On Monte Giordano in Rome, he painted a façade in chiaroscuro, and at S. Maria de Anima, near the side door leading to the Pace, he created a fresco of St. Christopher, eight braccia high, which is a very good figure. This work features a hermit holding a lantern in a grotto, executed with excellent skill, harmony, and grace.
Giovan Francesco then came to Florence, and painted for Lodovico Capponi at Montughi, a place without the Porta a San Gallo, a shrine with a Madonna, which is much extolled.
Giovan Francesco then arrived in Florence and painted a well-praised shrine with a Madonna for Lodovico Capponi at Montughi, a location outside the Porta a San Gallo.
Raffaello having meanwhile been overtaken by death, Giulio Romano and Giovan Francesco, who had been his disciples, remained together for a long time, and finished in company such of Raffaello's works as had been left unfinished, and in particular those that he had begun in the Vigna of the Pope, and likewise those of the Great Hall in the Palace, wherein are painted by the hands of these two masters the stories of Constantine, with excellent figures, executed in an able and beautiful manner, although the invention and the sketches of these stories came in part from Raffaello. While these works were in progress, Perino del Vaga, a very excellent painter, took to wife a sister of Giovan Francesco; on which account they executed many works in company. And afterwards Giulio and Giovan Francesco, continuing to work together, painted a panel in two parts, containing the Assumption of Our Lady, which went to Monteluci, near Perugia; and also other works and pictures for various places.
Raffaello, having sadly passed away, left his disciples Giulio Romano and Giovan Francesco to work together for a long time. They completed many of Raffaello's unfinished pieces, especially those he had started in the Pope's Vigna and in the Great Hall of the Palace. In these spaces, they painted the stories of Constantine, showcasing impressive figures created skillfully and beautifully, even though the concepts and sketches for these stories were partly Raffaello's. During this time, the talented painter Perino del Vaga married Giovan Francesco's sister, which led them to collaborate on several projects. Later on, Giulio and Giovan Francesco continued their partnership, painting a two-panel piece featuring the Assumption of Our Lady, which was sent to Monteluci near Perugia, along with other works and paintings for various locations.

THE BAPTISM OF CONSTANTINE
(After the fresco by Giovanni Francesco Penni [Il Fattore].
Rome:
The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image
THE BAPTISM OF CONSTANTINE
(After the fresco by Giovanni Francesco Penni [Il Fattore].
Rome:
The Vatican)
Anderson
View larger image
Then, receiving a commission from Pope Clement to paint a panel-picture like the one by Raffaello (which is in S. Pietro a Montorio), which was to be sent to France, whither Raffaello had meant to send the first, they began it; but soon afterwards, having fallen out with each other, [Pg 79] they divided their inheritance of drawings and everything else left to them by Raffaello, and Giulio went off to Mantua, where he executed an endless number of works for the Marquis. Thither, not long afterwards, Giovan Francesco also made his way, drawn either by love of Giulio or by the hope of finding work; but he received so cold a welcome from Giulio that he soon departed, and, after travelling round Lombardy, he returned to Rome. And from Rome he went to Naples by ship in the train of the Marchese del Vasto, taking with him the now finished copy of the panel-picture of S. Pietro a Montorio, with other works, which he left in Ischia, an island belonging to the Marquis, while the panel was placed where it is at the present day, in the Church of S. Spirito degli Incurabili at Naples. Having thus settled in Naples, where he occupied himself with drawing and painting, Giovan Francesco was entertained and treated with great kindness by Tommaso Cambi, a Florentine merchant, who managed the affairs of that nobleman. But he did not live there long, because, being of a sickly habit of body, he fell ill and died, to the great grief of the noble Marquis and of all who knew him.
Then, after receiving a commission from Pope Clement to paint a panel similar to the one by Raffaello (which is in S. Pietro a Montorio) to be sent to France—where Raffaello had originally intended to send the first—they began the work. However, not long after, they had a falling out, [Pg 79] and decided to split their collection of drawings and everything else left to them by Raffaello. Giulio then headed to Mantua, where he created countless works for the Marquis. Not long after, Giovan Francesco also made his way there, either out of friendship for Giulio or in hopes of finding work. Unfortunately, he received such a cold reception from Giulio that he left quickly and, after traveling around Lombardy, returned to Rome. From Rome, he took a ship to Naples with the Marchese del Vasto, bringing along the now-finished copy of the panel picture from S. Pietro a Montorio, among other works, which he left in Ischia, an island owned by the Marquis, while the panel was placed where it remains today, in the Church of S. Spirito degli Incurabili in Naples. Once settled in Naples, where he focused on drawing and painting, Giovan Francesco was warmly welcomed and treated with kindness by Tommaso Cambi, a Florentine merchant who managed the affairs of that nobleman. However, he didn't stay there long, as he was in poor health, became ill, and passed away, causing great sadness to the noble Marquis and everyone who knew him.
He had a brother called Luca, likewise a painter, who worked in Genoa with his brother-in-law Perino, as well as at Lucca and many other places in Italy. In the end he went to England, where, after executing certain works for the King and for some merchants, he finally devoted himself to making designs for copper-plates for sending abroad, which he had engraved by Flemings. Of such he sent abroad a great number, which are known by his name as well as by the manner; and by his hand, among others, is a print wherein are some women in a bath, the original of which, by the hand of Luca himself, is in our book.
He had a brother named Luca, who was also a painter. They both worked in Genoa with Luca's brother-in-law Perino, and in Lucca, as well as in many other places in Italy. Eventually, he moved to England, where he completed some projects for the King and various merchants. He then focused on creating designs for copper plates to be sent abroad, which he had engraved by Flemish artists. He sent a large number of these abroad, known by his name as well as by their style. One of his prints features women in a bath, the original of which, created by Luca himself, is in our book.
A disciple of Giovan Francesco was Leonardo, called Il Pistoia because he came from that city, who executed some works at Lucca, and made many portraits from life in Rome. At Naples, for Diomede Caraffa, Bishop of Ariano, and now a Cardinal, he painted a panel-picture of the Stoning of S. Stephen for his chapel in S. Domenico. And for Monte Oliveto he painted another, which was placed on the high-altar, although it was afterwards removed to make room for a new one, [Pg 80] similar in subject, by the hand of Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo. Leonardo earned large sums from these Neapolitan nobles, but he accumulated little, for he squandered it all as it came to his hand; and finally he died in Naples, leaving behind him the reputation of having been a good colourist, but not of having shown much excellence in draughtsmanship.
A disciple of Giovan Francesco was Leonardo, known as Il Pistoia because he came from that city. He created some works in Lucca and made many portraits from life in Rome. In Naples, for Diomede Caraffa, Bishop of Ariano, who is now a Cardinal, he painted a panel of the Stoning of S. Stephen for his chapel in S. Domenico. He also painted another piece for Monte Oliveto, which was originally placed on the high altar but was later moved to make space for a new one, [Pg 80] similar in subject, by Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo. Leonardo earned a lot of money from these Neapolitan nobles, but he didn't save much, as he spent it all as soon as he got it. Ultimately, he died in Naples, leaving behind a reputation for being a good colorist, but not for having shown much skill in drawing.
Giovan Francesco lived forty years, and his works date about 1528.
Giovan Francesco lived for forty years, and his works are from around 1528.
A friend of Giovan Francesco, and likewise a disciple of Raffaello, was Pellegrino da Modena, who, having acquired in his native city the name of a man of fine genius for painting, and having heard of the marvels of Raffaello da Urbino, determined, in order to justify by means of labour the hopes already conceived of him, to go to Rome. Arriving there, he placed himself under Raffaello, who never refused anything to men of ability. There were then in Rome very many young men who were working at painting and seeking in mutual rivalry to surpass one another in draughtsmanship, in order to win the favour of Raffaello and to gain a name among men; and thus Pellegrino, giving unceasing attention to his studies, became not only a good draughtsman, but also a well-practised master of the whole of his art. And when Leo X commissioned Raffaello to paint the Loggie, Pellegrino also worked there, in company with the other young men; and so well did he succeed, that Raffaello afterwards made use of him in many other things.
A friend of Giovan Francesco and a student of Raffaello was Pellegrino da Modena. He had earned a reputation for being a talented painter in his hometown and, having heard about the wonders of Raffaello da Urbino, decided to go to Rome to prove his worth through hard work. Once he arrived, he studied under Raffaello, who was always willing to help talented individuals. At that time, many young artists in Rome were competing with one another to improve their skills in drawing, hoping to win Raffaello's approval and make a name for themselves. Pellegrino devoted himself fully to his studies and became not only a skilled draftsman but also a well-trained master of his craft. When Leo X commissioned Raffaello to paint the Loggie, Pellegrino worked alongside other young artists. He performed so well that Raffaello later employed him for many other projects.
He executed three figures in fresco in S. Eustachio at Rome, over an altar near the entrance into the church; and in the Church of the Portuguese, near the Scrofa, he painted in fresco the Chapel of the High-Altar, as well as the altar-piece. Afterwards, Cardinal Alborense having caused a chapel richly adorned with marbles to be erected in S. Jacopo, the Church of the Spanish people, with a S. James of marble by Jacopo Sansovino, four braccia and a half in height, and much extolled, Pellegrino painted there in fresco the stories of that Apostle, giving an air of great sweetness to his figures in imitation of his master Raffaello, and designing the whole composition so well, that the work made him known as an able man with a fine and beautiful genius for painting. This work finished, he made many others in Rome, both by himself and in company with others.
He created three fresco figures in S. Eustachio in Rome, above an altar near the church entrance. In the Church of the Portuguese, near the Scrofa, he painted the chapel of the high altar and the altar piece in fresco. Later, Cardinal Alborense had a chapel richly decorated with marble constructed in S. Jacopo, the church for the Spanish community, which featured a marble S. James by Jacopo Sansovino, standing four and a half braccia tall and highly praised. Pellegrino painted the stories of that Apostle there in fresco, giving his figures a sweet appearance in the style of his master Raffaello, and he designed the entire composition so well that it established him as a talented artist with a refined and beautiful painting style. After completing this work, he went on to create many others in Rome, both on his own and in collaboration with others.

THE LAST SUPPER
(After the fresco by Gaudenzio Milanese [Gaudenzio Ferrari].
Milan:
S. Maria della Passione)
Anderson
View larger image
THE LAST SUPPER
(After the fresco by Gaudenzio Milanese [Gaudenzio Ferrari].
Milan:
S. Maria della Passione)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 81] But finally, when death had come upon Raffaello, Pellegrino returned to Modena, where he executed many works; among others, he painted for a Confraternity of Flagellants a panel-picture in oils of S. John baptizing Christ, and another panel for the Church of the Servi, containing S. Cosimo and S. Damiano, with other figures. Afterwards, having taken a wife, he had a son, who was the cause of his death. For this son, having come to words with some companions, young men of Modena, killed one of them; the news of which being carried to Pellegrino, he, in order to help his son from falling into the hands of justice, set out to smuggle him away. But he had not gone far from his house, when he stumbled against the relatives of the dead youth, who were going about searching for the murderer; and they, confronting Pellegrino, who had no time to escape, and full of fury because they had not been able to catch his son, gave him so many wounds that they left him dead on the ground. This event was a great grief to the people of Modena, who knew that by the death of Pellegrino they had been robbed of a spirit truly excellent and rare.
[Pg 81] But finally, when death came for Raffaello, Pellegrino returned to Modena, where he created many works; among them, he painted an oil panel of St. John baptizing Christ for a Confraternity of Flagellants, as well as another panel for the Church of the Servi, featuring St. Cosimo and St. Damiano, along with other figures. Later, after marrying, he had a son, who ultimately caused his death. This son, after getting into an argument with some local young men, ended up killing one of them; when Pellegrino heard the news, he rushed out to help his son evade capture. However, he hadn’t gone far from his house before he ran into the victim's relatives, who were searching for the murderer. They confronted Pellegrino, who had no time to escape, and in their rage over not catching his son, they attacked him, leaving him dead on the ground. This incident brought great sorrow to the people of Modena, who knew that Pellegrino’s death meant the loss of a truly exceptional talent.
A contemporary of this craftsman was the Milanese Gaudenzio, a resolute, well-practised, and excellent painter, who made many works in fresco at Milan; and in particular, for the Frati della Passione, a most beautiful Last Supper, which remained unfinished by reason of his death. He also painted very well in oils, and there are many highly-esteemed works by his hand at Vercelli and Veralla.
A contemporary of this craftsman was the Milanese Gaudenzio, a determined, skilled, and talented painter who created many fresco works in Milan; in particular, for the Frati della Passione, a stunning Last Supper that remained unfinished due to his death. He was also an excellent oil painter, and there are many highly regarded works by him in Vercelli and Veralla.
[Pg 83] ANDREA DEL SARTO
[Pg 85] LIFE OF ANDREA DEL SARTO
A MOST EXCELLENT PAINTER OF FLORENCE
At length, after the Lives of many craftsmen who have been excellent, some in colouring, some in drawing, and others in invention, we have come to the most excellent Andrea del Sarto, in whose single person nature and art demonstrated all that painting can achieve by means of draughtsmanship, colouring, and invention, insomuch that, if Andrea had possessed a little more fire and boldness of spirit, to correspond to his profound genius and judgment in his art, without a doubt he would have had no equal. But a certain timidity of spirit and a sort of humility and simplicity in his nature made it impossible that there should be seen in him that glowing ardour and that boldness which, added to his other qualities, would have made him truly divine in painting; for which reason he lacked those adornments and that grandeur and abundance of manners which have been seen in many other painters. His figures, however, for all their simplicity and purity, are well conceived, free from errors, and absolutely perfect in every respect. The expressions of his heads, both in children and in women, are gracious and natural, and those of men, both young and old, admirable in their vivacity and animation; his draperies are beautiful to a marvel, and his nudes very well conceived. And although his drawing is simple, all that he coloured is rare and truly divine.
Eventually, after discussing the lives of many skilled craftsmen—some exceptional in color, some in drawing, and others in creativity—we arrive at the remarkable Andrea del Sarto, who embodied what painting can achieve through skill, color, and creativity. If Andrea had just a bit more passion and confidence to match his deep genius and judgment in art, he would undoubtedly have been unmatched. However, his natural timidity and a kind of humility and simplicity meant that he lacked the fiery enthusiasm and boldness that, combined with his other qualities, would have made him truly extraordinary in painting. For this reason, he missed the embellishments and grandeur that many other artists have showcased. Nevertheless, his figures, despite their simplicity and purity, are well-conceived, error-free, and perfect in every way. The expressions in his portraits—both of children and women—are graceful and lifelike, while those of men, whether young or old, are remarkable for their energy and liveliness. His draperies are stunningly beautiful, and his nudes are very well executed. Even though his drawing is straightforward, everything he painted is rare and genuinely exceptional.
Andrea was born in Florence, in the year 1478, to a father who was all his life a tailor; whence he was always called Andrea del Sarto by everyone. Having come to the age of seven, he was taken away from his reading and writing school and apprenticed to the goldsmith's craft. But in this he was always much more willing to practise his hand in [Pg 86] drawing, to which he was drawn by a natural inclination, than in using the tools for working in silver or gold; whence it came to pass that Gian Barile, a painter of Florence, but one of gross and vulgar taste, having seen the boy's good manner of drawing, took him under his protection, and, making him abandon his work as goldsmith, directed him to the art of painting. Andrea, beginning with much delight to practise it, recognized that nature had created him for that profession; and in a very short space of time, therefore, he was doing such things with colours as filled Gian Barile and the other craftsmen in the city with marvel. Now after three years, through continual study, he had acquired an excellent mastery over his work, and Gian Barile saw that by persisting in his studies the boy was likely to achieve an extraordinary success. Having therefore spoken of him to Piero di Cosimo, who was held at that time to be one of the best painters in Florence, he placed Andrea with Piero. And Andrea, as one full of desire to learn, laboured and studied without ceasing; while nature, which had created him to be a painter, so wrought in him, that he handled and managed his colours with as much grace as if he had been working for fifty years. Wherefore Piero conceived an extraordinary love for him, feeling marvellous pleasure in hearing that when Andrea had any time to himself, particularly on feast-days, he would spend the whole day in company with other young men, drawing in the Sala del Papa, wherein were the cartoons of Michelagnolo and Leonardo da Vinci, and that, young as he was, he surpassed all the other draughtsmen, both native and foreign, who were always competing there with one another.
Andrea was born in Florence in 1478 to a father who was a tailor his entire life; that's why everyone called him Andrea del Sarto. At the age of seven, he was taken out of school for reading and writing and apprenticed to a goldsmith. However, he was always more eager to practice his drawing skills, which he had a natural talent for, than to use the tools for working with silver or gold. This led Gian Barile, a painter from Florence known for his crude and unrefined taste, to notice the boy's good drawing abilities. He took Andrea under his wing, made him quit goldsmithing, and directed him toward painting. Andrea took great joy in it and soon realized he was made for this profession. In a brief period, he was creating works with colors that amazed Gian Barile and other craftsmen in the city. After three years of constant practice, he had gained excellent control over his work, and Gian Barile recognized that the boy could achieve remarkable success if he continued studying. He then spoke to Piero di Cosimo, who was considered one of the best painters in Florence at the time, and arranged for Andrea to work with him. Eager to learn, Andrea worked and studied tirelessly, and nature, which had destined him to be a painter, allowed him to handle colors with such grace as if he had been doing it for fifty years. Consequently, Piero grew exceptionally fond of him, especially when he learned that, whenever Andrea had free time, particularly on holidays, he would spend the entire day drawing with other young men in the Sala del Papa, where the artworks of Michelangelo and Leonardo da Vinci were displayed, and that, despite his youth, he outperformed all the other draftsmen, both local and foreign, who were always competing with one another.

"NOLI ME TANGERE"
(After the panel by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: Uffizi, 93)
Alinari
View larger image
"NOLI ME TANGERE"
(After the panel by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: Uffizi, 93)
Alinari
View larger image
Among these young men, there was one who pleased Andrea more than any other with his nature and conversation, namely, the painter Franciabigio; and Franciabigio, likewise, was attracted by Andrea. Having become friends, therefore, Andrea said to Franciabigio that he could no longer endure the caprices of Piero, who was now old, and that for this reason he wished to take a room for himself. Hearing this, Franciabigio, who was obliged to do the same thing because his master Mariotto Albertinelli had abandoned the art of painting, said to his companion Andrea that he also was in need of a room, and that it would be [Pg 87] to the advantage of both of them if they were to join forces. Having therefore taken a room on the Piazza del Grano, they executed many works in company; among others, the curtains that cover the panel-pictures on the high-altar of the Servi; for which they received the commission from a sacristan very closely related to Franciabigio. On one of those curtains, that which faces the choir, they painted the Annunciation of the Virgin; and on the other, which is in front, a Deposition of Christ from the Cross, like that of the panel-picture which was there, painted by Filippo and Pietro Perugino.
Among these young men, there was one who impressed Andrea more than anyone else with his demeanor and conversation, namely, the painter Franciabigio; and Franciabigio was similarly drawn to Andrea. After becoming friends, Andrea told Franciabigio that he could no longer tolerate Piero's whims, who was now old, and for that reason, he wanted to rent a room for himself. Hearing this, Franciabigio, who needed to do the same because his master Mariotto Albertinelli had left painting, said to Andrea that he also needed a room and it would be beneficial for both of them to team up. So, after renting a room on the Piazza del Grano, they collaborated on many works, including the curtains that cover the panel paintings on the high altar of the Servi; they received the commission from a sacristan closely related to Franciabigio. On one of those curtains, which faces the choir, they painted the Annunciation of the Virgin; and on the other, which is at the front, a Deposition of Christ from the Cross, similar to the panel painting there by Filippo and Pietro Perugino.
The men of that company in Florence which is called the Company of the Scalzo used to assemble at the head of the Via Larga, above the houses of the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, and opposite to the garden of S. Marco, in a building dedicated to S. John the Baptist, which had been built in those days by a number of Florentine craftsmen, who had made there, among other things, an entrance-court of masonry with a loggia which rested on some columns of no great size. And some of them, perceiving that Andrea was on the way to becoming known as an excellent painter, and being richer in spirit than in pocket, determined that he should paint round that cloister twelve pictures in chiaroscuro—that is to say, in fresco with terretta—containing twelve scenes from the life of S. John the Baptist. Whereupon, setting his hand to this, he painted in the first the scene of S. John baptizing Christ, with much diligence and great excellence of manner, whereby he gained credit, honour, and fame to such an extent, that many persons turned to him with commissions for works, as to one whom they thought to be destined in time to reach that honourable goal which was foreshadowed by his extraordinary beginnings in his profession.
The men from a group in Florence known as the Company of the Scalzo used to gather at the top of Via Larga, above the homes of the renowned Ottaviano de' Medici, and across from the garden of S. Marco, in a building dedicated to S. John the Baptist. This building had been constructed by various Florentine craftsmen of the time, who also created an entrance courtyard made of masonry with a loggia supported by relatively small columns. Some of them, noticing that Andrea was on his way to becoming a recognized painter and being richer in talent than in finances, decided that he should paint twelve pictures in chiaroscuro—that is, frescoes using terretta—featuring scenes from the life of S. John the Baptist around that cloister. Consequently, he got to work and in the first one, he depicted S. John baptizing Christ, applying great care and skill, which earned him credit, honor, and fame to such an extent that many people approached him with requests for commissions, believing he was destined to achieve the remarkable success suggested by his extraordinary early work in his profession.
Among other works that he made in that first manner, he painted a picture which is now in the house of Filippo Spini, held in great veneration in memory of so able a craftsman. And not long after this he was commissioned to paint for a chapel in S. Gallo, the Church of the Eremite Observantines of the Order of S. Augustine, without the Porta a S. Gallo, a panel-picture of Christ appearing in the garden to Mary Magdalene in the form of a gardener; which work, what with the colouring and a certain [Pg 88] quality of softness and harmony, is sweetness itself, and so well executed, that it led to his painting two others not long afterwards for the same church, as will be related below. This panel is now in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, on the Canto degli Alberti, together with the two others.
Among other works he created in that early style, he painted a picture that's now in the home of Filippo Spini, greatly revered in memory of such a skilled artisan. Shortly after this, he was asked to paint a panel for a chapel in S. Gallo, at the Church of the Eremite Observantines of the Order of S. Augustine, outside the Porta a S. Gallo. This artwork depicts Christ appearing in the garden to Mary Magdalene in the guise of a gardener; it's notable for its coloring and a certain [Pg 88] softness and harmony, making it truly delightful. It was executed so well that it inspired him to paint two more for the same church shortly after, as will be detailed below. This panel is now located in S. Jacopo tra Fossi, on the Canto degli Alberti, along with the other two.
After these works, Andrea and Franciabigio, leaving the Piazza del Grano, took new rooms in the Sapienza, near the Convent of the Nunziata; whence it came about that Andrea and Jacopo Sansovino, who was then a young man and was working at sculpture in the same place under his master Andrea Contucci, formed so warm and so strait a friendship together, that neither by day nor by night were they ever separated one from another. Their discussions were for the most part on the difficulties of art, so that it is no marvel that both of them should have afterwards become most excellent, as is now being shown of Andrea and as will be related in the proper place of Jacopo.
After these projects, Andrea and Franciabigio left the Piazza del Grano and moved into new rooms at the Sapienza, close to the Convent of the Nunziata. This led to a close friendship between Andrea and Jacopo Sansovino, who was then a young man working on sculpture in the same place under his mentor Andrea Contucci. They were so inseparable that they spent all their time together, day and night. Most of their conversations revolved around the challenges of art, so it’s no surprise that both of them later became exceptional artists, as is currently evident with Andrea and will be discussed at the appropriate time regarding Jacopo.

THE LAST SUPPER
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: S. Salvi)
Anderson
View larger image
THE LAST SUPPER
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: S. Salvi)
Anderson
View larger image
There was at this same time in the Convent of the Servi, selling the candles at the counter, a friar called Fra Mariano dal Canto alla Macine, who was also sacristan; and he heard everyone extolling Andrea mightily and saying that he was by way of making marvellous proficience in painting. Whereupon he planned to fulfil a desire of his own without much expense; and so, approaching Andrea, who was a mild and guileless fellow, on the side of his honour, he began to persuade him under the cloak of friendship that he wished to help him in a matter which would bring him honour and profit and would make him known in such a manner, that he would never be poor any more. Now many years before, as has been related above, Alesso Baldovinetti had painted a Nativity of Christ in the first cloister of the Servi, on the wall that has the Annunciation behind it; and in the same cloister, on the other side, Cosimo Rosselli had begun a scene of S. Filippo, the founder of that Servite Order, assuming the habit. But Cosimo had not carried that scene to completion, because death came upon him at the very moment when he was working at it. The friar, then, being very eager to see the rest finished, thought of serving his own ends by making Andrea and Franciabigio, who, from being friends, had become rivals in art, compete with one another, each doing part of the work. This, besides effecting [Pg 89] his purpose very well, would make the expense less and their efforts greater. Thereupon, revealing his mind to Andrea, he persuaded him to undertake that enterprise, by pointing out to him that since it was a public and much frequented place, he would become known on account of such a work no less by foreigners than by the Florentines; that he should not look for any payment in return, or even for an invitation to undertake it, but should rather pray to be allowed to do it; and that if he were not willing to set to work, there was Franciabigio, who, in order to make himself known, had offered to accept it and to leave the matter of payment to him. These incitements did much to make Andrea resolve to undertake the work, and the rather as he was a man of little spirit; and the last reference to Franciabigio induced him to make up his mind completely and to come to an agreement, in the form of a written contract, with regard to the whole work, on the terms that no one else should have a hand in it. The friar, then, having thus pledged him and given him money, demanded that he should begin by continuing the life of S. Filippo, without receiving more than ten ducats from him in payment of each scene; and he told Andrea that he was giving him even that out of his own pocket, and was doing it more for the benefit and advantage of the painter than through any want or need of the convent.
At the same time in the Convent of the Servi, a friar named Fra Mariano dal Canto alla Macine, who also served as the sacristan, was selling candles at the counter. He heard everyone praising Andrea and saying that he was making amazing progress in painting. So, he decided to fulfill a personal desire without spending much money. Approaching Andrea, who was a gentle and innocent guy, he started to persuade him, under the guise of friendship, that he wanted to help him with something that would bring him honor and profit, making him famous enough that he’d never be poor again. Many years earlier, as mentioned before, Alesso Baldovinetti had painted a Nativity of Christ in the first cloister of the Servi, on the wall that has the Annunciation behind it. In that same cloister, Cosimo Rosselli had started a scene of St. Filippo, the founder of the Servite Order, assuming the habit. But Cosimo didn't finish that scene because he died while working on it. Eager to see it completed, the friar thought he could use this opportunity to have Andrea and Franciabigio, who had become rivals in art from being friends, compete with each other, each taking on part of the work. This would help him meet his goals while also reducing costs and increasing their efforts. So, he shared his plan with Andrea, convincing him to take on the project by highlighting that since it was a public and busy place, this work would gain him recognition from both locals and visitors. He advised Andrea not to expect any payment or even an official invitation to do it, but rather to pray to be allowed to work on it; and if he didn’t want to start, Franciabigio was also ready to take it on, leaving the payment question to the friar. These encouragements greatly influenced Andrea's decision to accept the project, especially since he was not very assertive; the mention of Franciabigio finally convinced him to agree and formalize the arrangement through a written contract stipulating that no one else would be involved. With this commitment in place, the friar gave him money and requested that he begin by continuing the life of St. Filippo, agreeing to pay him ten ducats for each scene. He told Andrea that he was giving him even that amount from his own funds and that he was doing it more for the painter’s benefit than out of any need from the convent.
Andrea, therefore, pursuing that work with the utmost diligence, like one who thought more of honour than of profit, after no long time completely finished the first three scenes and unveiled them. One was the scene of S. Filippo, now a friar, clothing the naked. In another he is shown rebuking certain gamesters, who blasphemed God and laughed at S. Filippo, mocking at his admonition, when suddenly there comes a lightning-flash from Heaven, which, striking a tree under the shade of which they were sheltering, kills two of them and throws the rest into an incredible panic. Some, with their hands to their heads, cast themselves forward in dismay; others, crying aloud in their terror, turn to flight; a woman, beside herself with fear at the sound of the thunder, is running away so naturally that she appears to be truly alive; and a horse, breaking loose amid this uproar and confusion, reveals with his leaps and fearsome movements what fear and terror are caused by things [Pg 90] so sudden and so unexpected. In all this one can see how carefully Andrea looked to variety of incident in the representation of such events, with a forethought truly beautiful and most necessary for one who practises painting. In the third he painted the scene of S. Filippo delivering a woman from evil spirits, with all the most characteristic considerations that could be imagined in such an action. All these scenes brought extraordinary fame and honour to Andrea; and thus encouraged, he went on to paint two other scenes in the same cloister. On one wall is S. Filippo lying dead, with his friars about him making lamentation; and in addition there is a dead child, who, touching the bier on which S. Filippo lies, comes to life again, so that he is first seen dead, and then revived and restored to life, and all with a very beautiful, natural, and appropriate effect. In the last picture on that side he represented the friars placing the garments of S. Filippo on the heads of certain children; and there he made a portrait of Andrea della Robbia, the sculptor, in an old man clothed in red, who comes forward, stooping, with a staff in his hand. There, too, he portrayed Luca, his son; even as in the other scene mentioned above, in which S. Filippo lies dead, he made a portrait of another son of Andrea, named Girolamo, a sculptor and very much his friend, who died not long since in France.
Andrea, therefore, worked on this project with great care, prioritizing honor over profit. After a short time, he completed the first three scenes and revealed them. One depicted St. Philip, now a friar, clothing the naked. In another, he is shown rebuking some gamblers who were cursing God and mocking St. Philip’s warnings when suddenly a flash of lightning from Heaven struck a tree under which they were sheltering, killing two of them and throwing the others into a state of panic. Some, with their hands on their heads, fell forward in distress; others cried out in fear and fled; a woman, completely terrified by the thunder, ran away so convincingly that she seemed genuinely alive; and a horse, breaking free amid the chaos, demonstrated the fear and terror brought on by such sudden and unexpected events. One can see how carefully Andrea considered the variety of incidents in representing these events, showing a truly admirable foresight necessary for someone practicing painting. In the third scene, he painted St. Philip freeing a woman from evil spirits, including all the most striking details imaginable for such an event. These scenes brought exceptional fame and honor to Andrea; encouraged by this success, he proceeded to paint two more scenes in the same cloister. One wall features St. Philip lying dead, surrounded by his friars grieving; additionally, there’s a dead child who, upon touching the bier on which St. Philip lies, comes back to life, first seen dead and then revived, all with a very beautiful, natural, and fitting effect. In the final painting on that side, he represented the friars placing St. Philip's garments on the heads of some children; and he included a portrait of Andrea della Robbia, the sculptor, depicted as an old man in red, bent over with a staff in his hand. He also portrayed Luca, his son; just as in the earlier scene where St. Philip lies dead, he made a portrait of another son of Andrea, named Girolamo, a sculptor and close friend, who passed away not long ago in France.
Having thus finished that side of the cloister, and considering that if the honour was great, the payment was small, Andrea resolved to give up the rest of the work, however much the friar might complain. But the latter would not release him from his bond without Andrea first promising that he would paint two other scenes, at his own leisure and convenience, however, and with an increase of payment; and thus they came to terms.
Having finished that side of the cloister, and realizing that while the honor was significant, the pay was low, Andrea decided to quit the remaining work, no matter how much the friar might protest. However, the friar wouldn’t let him off the hook without first getting a promise from Andrea that he would paint two more scenes, at his own pace and convenience, with a higher payment; and so they reached an agreement.

THE ARRIVAL OF THE MAGI
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: SS. Annunziata)
Alinari
View larger image
THE ARRIVAL OF THE MAGI
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: SS. Annunziata)
Alinari
View larger image
Having come into greater repute by reason of these works, Andrea received commissions for many pictures and works of importance; among others, one from the General of the Monks of Vallombrosa, for painting an arch of the vaulting, with a Last Supper on the front wall, in the Refectory of the Monastery of S. Salvi, without the Porta alla Croce. In four medallions on that vault he painted four figures, S. Benedict, S. Giovanni Gualberto, S. Salvi the Bishop, and S. Bernardo degli Uberti [Pg 91] of Florence, a friar of that Order and a Cardinal; and in the centre he made a medallion containing three faces, which are one and the same, to represent the Trinity. All this was very well executed for a work in fresco, and Andrea, therefore, came to be valued at his true worth in the art of painting. Whereupon he was commissioned at the instance of Baccio d' Agnolo to paint in fresco, in a close on the steep path of Orsanmichele, which leads to the Mercato Nuovo, the Annunciation still to be seen there, executed on a minute scale, which brought him but little praise; and this may have been because Andrea, who worked well without over-exerting himself or forcing his powers, is believed to have tried in this work to force himself and to paint with too much care.
Having gained more recognition for his works, Andrea received commissions for many important paintings and projects. Among these was a request from the General of the Monks of Vallombrosa to paint an arch in the ceiling, featuring a Last Supper on the front wall, in the Refectory of the Monastery of S. Salvi, located outside the Porta alla Croce. He painted four figures in medallions on that arch: S. Benedict, S. Giovanni Gualberto, S. Salvi the Bishop, and S. Bernardo degli Uberti of Florence, who was a friar of that Order and a Cardinal. In the center, he created a medallion with three identical faces to represent the Trinity. All of this was very well done for a fresco, and as a result, Andrea was finally recognized for his true talent in painting. Following this, he was commissioned by Baccio d' Agnolo to create a fresco in a small area along the steep path of Orsanmichele, which leads to Mercato Nuovo. This piece, the Annunciation, can still be seen there and was executed on a small scale, but it earned him little praise. This might be because Andrea, who usually worked easily without overstressing himself, seemed to have pushed himself too hard in this work, trying to paint with excessive care.
As for the many pictures that he executed after this for Florence, it would take too long to try to speak of them all; and I will only say that among the most distinguished may be numbered the one that is now in the apartment of Baccio Barbadori, containing a full-length Madonna with a Child in her arms, S. Anne, and S. Joseph, all painted in a beautiful manner and held very dear by Baccio. He made one, likewise well worthy of praise, which is now in the possession of Lorenzo di Domenico Borghini, and another of Our Lady for Leonardo del Giocondo, which at the present day is in the hands of Piero, the son of Leonardo. For Carlo Ginori he painted two of no great size, which were bought afterwards by the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici; and one of these is now in his most beautiful villa of Campi, while the other, together with many other modern pictures executed by the most excellent masters, is in the apartment of the worthy son of so great a father, Signor Bernardetto, who not only esteems and honours the works of famous craftsmen, but is also in his every action a truly generous and magnificent nobleman.
As for the many paintings he created later for Florence, it would take too long to mention them all; I will only note that among the most notable is the one now in Baccio Barbadori's apartment, featuring a full-length Madonna holding a Child, along with St. Anne and St. Joseph, all beautifully painted and dearly cherished by Baccio. He also made another commendable piece, currently owned by Lorenzo di Domenico Borghini, and another of Our Lady for Leonardo del Giocondo, which is now in the hands of Piero, Leonardo's son. For Carlo Ginori, he painted two smaller works, which were later bought by the esteemed Ottaviano de' Medici; one of these is now in his beautiful villa in Campi, while the other, along with several other contemporary paintings by great masters, is in the apartment of the worthy son of such a great father, Signor Bernardetto, who not only values and honors the works of famous artisans but is also, in all his actions, a truly generous and noble gentleman.
Meanwhile the Servite friar had allotted to Franciabigio one of the scenes in the above-mentioned cloister; but that master had not yet finished making the screen, when Andrea, becoming apprehensive, since it seemed to him that Franciabigio was an abler and more dexterous master than himself in the handling of colours in fresco, executed, as it were out of rivalry, the cartoons for his two scenes, which he intended to paint on the angle between the side-door of S. Bastiano and the [Pg 92] smaller door that leads from the cloister into the Nunziata. Having made the cartoons, he set to work in fresco; and in the first scene he painted the Nativity of Our Lady, a composition of figures beautifully proportioned and grouped with great grace in a room, wherein some women who are friends and relatives of the newly delivered mother, having come to visit her, are standing about her, all clothed in such garments as were customary at that time, and other women of lower degree, gathered around the fire, are washing the newborn babe, while others are preparing the swathing-bands and doing other similar services. Among them is a little boy, full of life, who is warming himself at the fire, with an old man resting in a very natural attitude on a couch, and likewise some women carrying food to the mother who is in bed, with movements truly lifelike and appropriate. And all these figures, together with some little boys who are hovering in the air and scattering flowers, are most carefully considered in their expressions, their draperies, and every other respect, and so soft in colour, that the figures appear to be of flesh and everything else rather real than painted.
Meanwhile, the Servite friar assigned Franciabigio a scene in the cloister mentioned earlier; however, that artist had not yet finished the screen when Andrea, feeling uneasy, thought that Franciabigio was a more skilled and adept master than he was when it came to handling colors in fresco. In a competitive spirit, he created the sketches for his two scenes, which he planned to paint at the corner between the side door of S. Bastiano and the [Pg 92] smaller door leading from the cloister into the Nunziata. After finishing the sketches, he began to work in fresco; in the first scene, he depicted the Nativity of Our Lady, with figures beautifully proportioned and gracefully arranged in a room. Some women, friends and relatives of the new mother, gathered around her, all dressed in the styles typical of that time, while other lower-status women, huddled around the fire, washed the newborn baby, and others prepared swaddling clothes and tended to other similar tasks. Among them was a lively little boy warming himself by the fire, and an old man lounging in a natural pose on a couch, along with women bringing food to the mother who was in bed, moving in a truly lifelike and fitting manner. All these figures, alongside some little boys fluttering in the air and scattering flowers, were meticulously crafted in their expressions, drapery, and every detail, resulting in such soft colors that the figures look more like flesh and everything else seems more real than painted.
In the other scene Andrea painted the three Magi from the East, who, guided by the Star, went to adore the Infant Jesus Christ. He represented them dismounted, as though they were near their destination; and that because there was only the space embracing the two doors to separate them from the Nativity of Christ which may be seen there, by the hand of Alesso Baldovinetti. In this scene Andrea painted the Court of those three Kings coming behind them, with baggage, much equipment, and many people following in their train, among whom, in a corner, are three persons portrayed from life and wearing the Florentine dress, one being Jacopo Sansovino, a full-length figure looking straight at the spectator, while another, with an arm in foreshortening, who is leaning against him and making a sign, is Andrea, the master of the work, and a third head, seen in profile behind Jacopo, is that of Ajolle, the musician. There are, in addition, some little boys who are climbing on the walls, in order to be able to see the magnificent procession and the fantastic animals that those three Kings have brought with them. This scene is quite equal in excellence to that mentioned above; nay, in both [Pg 93] the one and the other he surpassed himself, not to speak of Franciabigio, who also finished his.
In the other scene, Andrea painted the three Magi from the East, who, guided by the Star, went to worship the Infant Jesus Christ. He depicted them dismounted, as though they were close to their destination; and that’s because there was just the area between the two doors separating them from the Nativity of Christ, which can be seen there, created by the hand of Alesso Baldovinetti. In this scene, Andrea painted the entourage of those three Kings following them, complete with luggage, a lot of gear, and many people trailing behind, including, in a corner, three figures painted from life in Florentine clothing. One is Jacopo Sansovino, a full-length figure facing the viewer, while another, with an arm in foreshortening, leaning against him and gesturing, is Andrea, the master of the work, and a third profile seen behind Jacopo belongs to Ajolle, the musician. Additionally, there are some little boys climbing on the walls to catch a glimpse of the magnificent procession and the fantastic animals that those three Kings brought with them. This scene is equally excellent as the one mentioned above; indeed, in both[Pg 93] he outdid himself, not to mention Franciabigio, who also completed his work.
At this same time Andrea painted for the Abbey of S. Godenzo, a benefice belonging to the same friars, a panel which was held to be very well executed. And for the Friars of S. Gallo he made a panel-picture of Our Lady receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, wherein may be seen a very pleasing harmony of colouring, while the heads of some Angels accompanying Gabriel show a sweet gradation of tints and a perfectly executed beauty of expression in their features; and the predella below this picture was painted by Jacopo da Pontormo, who was a disciple of Andrea at that time, and gave proofs at that early age that he was destined to produce afterwards those beautiful works which he actually did execute in Florence with his own hand, although in the end he became one might say another painter, as will be related in his Life.
At the same time, Andrea painted a panel for the Abbey of S. Godenzo, a benefice owned by the same friars, which was considered very well done. For the Friars of S. Gallo, he created a panel picture of Our Lady receiving the Annunciation from the Angel, showcasing a very appealing harmony of colors. The heads of some Angels accompanying Gabriel display a lovely gradation of shades and beautifully executed expressions. The predella below this painting was done by Jacopo da Pontormo, who was a student of Andrea at that time and showed early signs that he would later create the stunning works he actually produced in Florence with his own hand. However, in the end, he became what one might call a different kind of painter, as will be detailed in his Life.
Andrea then painted for Zanobi Girolami a picture with figures of no great size, wherein was a story of Joseph, the son of Jacob, which was finished by him with unremitting diligence, and therefore held to be a very beautiful painting. Not long after this, he undertook to execute for the men of the Company of S. Maria della Neve, situated behind the Nunnery of S. Ambrogio, a little panel with three figures—Our Lady, S. John the Baptist, and S. Ambrogio; which work, when finished, was placed in due time on the altar of that Company.
Andrea then painted a picture for Zanobi Girolami featuring small figures, depicting the story of Joseph, the son of Jacob. He completed it with relentless dedication, and it was considered a very beautiful painting. Shortly after, he took on a project for the members of the Company of S. Maria della Neve, located behind the Nunnery of S. Ambrogio. This work was a small panel with three figures—Our Lady, S. John the Baptist, and S. Ambrogio. Once completed, it was properly placed on the altar of that Company.
Meanwhile, thanks to his talent, Andrea had become intimate with Giovanni Gaddi, afterwards appointed Clerk of the Chamber, who, always delighting in the arts of design, was then keeping Jacopo Sansovino continually at work. Being pleased, therefore, with the manner of Andrea, he caused him to paint a picture of Our Lady for himself, which was very beautiful, for Andrea painted various patterns and other ingenious devices round it, so that it was considered to be the most beautiful work that he had executed up to that time. After this he made for Giovanni di Paolo, the mercer, another picture of Our Lady, which, being truly lovely, gave infinite pleasure to all who saw it. And for Andrea Santini he executed another, containing Our Lady, Christ, S. John, and S. Joseph, all wrought with such diligence [Pg 94] that the painting has always been esteemed in Florence as worthy of great praise.
Meanwhile, thanks to his talent, Andrea had become close with Giovanni Gaddi, who was later appointed Clerk of the Chamber. Giovanni, who always enjoyed the art of design, was constantly keeping Jacopo Sansovino busy with work. Impressed by Andrea's style, he asked him to paint a picture of Our Lady for himself, which turned out beautifully. Andrea included various patterns and clever designs around it, making it the most beautiful piece he had created up to that point. After this, he painted another picture of Our Lady for Giovanni di Paolo, the mercer, which was truly lovely and brought immense joy to everyone who saw it. For Andrea Santini, he created yet another painting featuring Our Lady, Christ, St. John, and St. Joseph, all crafted with such care that it has always been highly regarded in Florence as deserving of great praise. [Pg 94]
All these works acquired such a name for Andrea in his city, that among the many, both young and old, who were painting at that time, he was considered one of the most excellent who were handling brushes and colours. Wherefore he found himself not only honoured, but even, although he exacted the most paltry prices for his labours, in a condition to do something to help and support his family, and also to shelter himself from the annoyances and anxieties which afflict those of us who live in poverty. But he became enamoured of a young woman, and a little time afterwards, when she had been left a widow, he took her for his wife; and then he had more than enough to do for the rest of his life, and much more trouble than he had suffered in the past, for the reason that, in addition to the labours and annoyances that such entanglements generally involve, he undertook others into the bargain, such as that of letting himself be harassed now by jealousy, now by one thing, and now by another.
All these works gave Andrea such a reputation in his city that among all the painters, both young and old, he was regarded as one of the best at handling brushes and colors. As a result, he found himself not only honored but also able to help support his family, even though he charged very low prices for his work. This allowed him to escape some of the worries and stresses that come with living in poverty. However, he fell in love with a young woman, and shortly after she was widowed, he married her. From that point on, he had more than enough to keep him busy for the rest of his life and faced much more trouble than he had before. This was because, in addition to the usual challenges that relationships bring, he also had to deal with issues like jealousy and various other problems.

ANDREA DEL SARTO: MADONNA DELL' ARPIE
(Florence: Uffizi, 1112. Panel)
View larger image
ANDREA DEL SARTO: MADONNA DELL' ARPIE
(Florence: Uffizi, 1112. Panel)
View larger image
But to return to the works of his hand, which were as rare as they were numerous: after those of which mention has been made above, he painted for a friar of S. Croce, of the Order of Minorites, who was then Governor of the Nunnery of S. Francesco in Via Pentolini, and delighted much in paintings, a panel-picture destined for the Church of those Nuns, of Our Lady standing on high upon an octagonal pedestal, at the corners of which are seated some Harpies, as it were in adoration of the Virgin; and she, using one hand to uphold her Son, who is clasping her most tenderly round the neck with His arms, in a very beautiful attitude, is holding a closed book in the other hand and gazing on two little naked boys, who, while helping her to stand upright, serve as ornaments about her person. This Madonna has on her right a beautifully painted S. Francis, in whose face may be seen the goodness and simplicity that truly belonged to that saintly man; besides which, the feet are marvellous, and so are the draperies, because Andrea always rounded off his figures with a very rich flow of folds and with certain most delicate curves, in such a way as to reveal the nude below. On her left hand she has a [Pg 95] S. John the Evangelist, represented as a young man and in the act of writing his Gospel, in a very beautiful manner. In this work, moreover, over the building and the figures, is a film of transparent clouds, which appear to be really moving. This picture, among all Andrea's works, is held at the present day to be one of singular and truly rare beauty. For the joiner Nizza, also, he made a picture of Our Lady, which was considered to be no less beautiful than any of his other works.
But to get back to the amazing creations he made, which were as unique as they were plentiful: after the ones mentioned earlier, he painted a panel for a friar from S. Croce, a member of the Minorite Order, who was then the Governor of the Nunnery of S. Francesco in Via Pentolini and had a great fondness for paintings. This artwork was intended for the church of those nuns, showing Our Lady standing on a tall octagonal pedestal, with Harpies seated at each corner, seemingly adoring the Virgin. She supports her Son with one hand, who is tenderly wrapped around her neck, while in her other hand she holds a closed book, gazing at two small naked boys who, while helping her stay upright, also serve as decorative elements around her. This Madonna has a beautifully painted S. Francis to her right, whose face reflects the kindness and simplicity that truly belonged to that holy man. The feet and drapery are remarkable too, as Andrea always finished his figures with a rich flow of folds and delicate curves that subtly reveal the form beneath. To her left is a [Pg 95] S. John the Evangelist, depicted as a young man in the act of writing his Gospel, in a striking manner. Additionally, a layer of transparent clouds drapes over the building and figures, giving the impression of movement. This piece, among all of Andrea's works, is considered to be one of exceptional and truly rare beauty today. For the carpenter Nizza, he also created a picture of Our Lady, which was regarded as no less beautiful than his other works.
After this, the Guild of Merchants determined to have some triumphal chariots made of wood after the manner of those of the ancient Romans, to the end that these might be drawn in procession on the morning of S. John's day, in place of certain altar-cloths and wax tapers which the cities and townships carry in token of tribute, passing before the Duke and the chief magistrates; and out of ten that were made at that time, Andrea painted some with scenes in oils and in chiaroscuro, which were much extolled. But although it was proposed that some should be made every year, until such time as every city and district had one of its own, which would have produced a show of extraordinary magnificence, nevertheless this custom was abandoned in the year 1527.
After this, the Merchants' Guild decided to create wooden triumphal chariots similar to those of the ancient Romans, so they could be paraded on the morning of St. John's Day instead of the usual altar cloths and wax candles that cities and towns present as a token of tribute to the Duke and the chief magistrates. Out of ten chariots made at that time, Andrea painted some with oil scenes and chiaroscuro, which received a lot of praise. Although it was suggested that new chariots be made every year until each city and district had one of its own, creating an extraordinary display, this custom was ultimately abandoned in 1527.
Now, while Andrea was adorning his city with these and other works, and his name was growing greater every day, the men of the Company of the Scalzo resolved that he should finish the work in their cloister, which he had formerly begun by painting the scene of the Baptism of Christ. Having resumed that work, therefore, more willingly, he executed two scenes there, with two very beautiful figures of Charity and Justice to adorn the door that leads into the building of the Company. In one of these scenes he represented S. John preaching to the multitude in a spirited attitude, lean in person, as befitted the life that he was leading, and with an expression of countenance filled with inspiration and thoughtfulness. Marvellous, likewise, are the variety and the vivacity of his hearers, some being shown in admiration, and all in astonishment, at hearing that new message and a doctrine so singular and never heard before. Even more did Andrea exert his genius in painting the same John baptizing with water a vast number of people, some of whom are stripping off their clothes, some receiving the baptism, [Pg 96] and others, naked, waiting for him to finish baptizing those who are before them. In all of them Andrea showed a vivid emotion, with a burning desire in the gestures of those who are eager to be purified of their sins; not to mention that all the figures are so well executed in that chiaroscuro, that the whole has the appearance of a real and most lifelike scene in marble.
Now, while Andrea was beautifying his city with these and other works, and his reputation was growing every day, the members of the Company of the Scalzo decided that he should complete the work he had previously started in their cloister, which was the painting of the Baptism of Christ. Therefore, he eagerly resumed that work and created two scenes there, featuring two stunning figures of Charity and Justice to decorate the door leading into the Company's building. In one of these scenes, he depicted St. John preaching to the crowd with passion, appearing lean as was fitting for his lifestyle, and with a face full of inspiration and thoughtfulness. The variety and liveliness of his listeners are also remarkable, some shown in admiration and all in astonishment at receiving such a new and unique message and teaching never heard before. Andrea further showcased his talent in painting the same John baptizing a large number of people, some of whom are taking off their clothes, some receiving the baptism, [Pg 96], and others, naked, waiting for him to finish baptizing those in front of them. In all of them, Andrea captured vivid emotion, with a burning desire reflected in the gestures of those eager to be cleansed of their sins; not to mention that all the figures are so well executed in that chiaroscuro style, that the entire scene resembles a real and lifelike representation in marble.
I will not refrain from saying that while Andrea was employed on these and other pictures, there appeared certain copper engravings by Albrecht Dürer, and Andrea made use of them, taking some of the figures and transforming them into his manner. And this has caused some people, while not saying that it is a bad thing for a man to make adroit use of the good work of others, to believe that Andrea had not much invention.
I won't hold back in saying that while Andrea was working on these and other paintings, some copper engravings by Albrecht Dürer were released, and Andrea used them, adapting some of the figures to fit his style. This has led some people to think, although they don’t outright say it's a bad thing to skillfully utilize the work of others, that Andrea lacked much originality.
At that time there came to Baccio Bandinelli, then a draughtsman of great repute, a desire to learn to paint in oils. Whereupon, knowing that no man in Florence knew how to do that better than our Andrea, he commissioned him to paint his portrait, which was a good likeness of him at that age, as may be seen even yet; and thus, by watching him paint that work and others, he saw his method of colouring, although afterwards, either by reason of the difficulty or from lack of inclination, he did not pursue the use of colours, finding more satisfaction in sculpture.
At that time, Baccio Bandinelli, who was a well-known draftsman, wanted to learn how to paint with oils. Knowing that nobody in Florence was better at it than Andrea, he asked him to paint his portrait, which is still a good likeness of him at that age. By watching Andrea paint that and other works, Baccio learned about his coloring technique. However, later on, either because it was difficult or he simply wasn't interested, he didn't continue using colors and found more fulfillment in sculpture.
Andrea executed for Alessandro Corsini a picture of a Madonna seated on the ground with a Child in her arms, surrounded by many little boys, which was finished with beautiful art and with very pleasing colour; and for a mercer, much his friend, who kept a shop in Rome, he made a most beautiful head. Giovan Battista Puccini of Florence, likewise, taking extraordinary pleasure in the manner of Andrea, commissioned him to paint a picture of Our Lady for sending into France; but it proved to be so fine that he kept it for himself, and would by no means send it. However, having been asked, while transacting the affairs of his business in France, to undertake to send choice paintings to that country, he caused Andrea to paint a picture of a Dead Christ surrounded by some Angels, who were supporting Him and contemplating with gestures of sorrow and compassion their Maker sunk to such a [Pg 97] pass through the sins of the world. This work, when finished, gave such universal satisfaction, that Andrea, urged by many entreaties, had it engraved in Rome by the Venetian Agostino; but it did not succeed very well, and he would never again give any of his works to be engraved. But to return to the picture: it gave no less satisfaction in France, whither it was sent, than it had done in Florence, insomuch that the King, kindled with even greater desire to have works by Andrea, gave orders that he should execute others; which was the reason that Andrea, encouraged by his friends, resolved to go in a short time to France.
Andrea painted a picture of a Madonna sitting on the ground with a Child in her arms, surrounded by several little boys, which was finished with great skill and pleasing colors. For a close friend who owned a shop in Rome, he created a stunning head. Giovan Battista Puccini from Florence, who greatly admired Andrea's style, commissioned him to paint a picture of Our Lady to send to France; however, it turned out so beautiful that he decided to keep it for himself and refused to send it. Later, while managing his business affairs in France, he was asked to send select paintings to that country, so he had Andrea create a painting of a Dead Christ surrounded by Angels who were supporting Him and expressing sorrow and compassion for their Maker, who was brought low by the world's sins. Once finished, this work was so well-received that Andrea, pressured by many requests, had it engraved in Rome by the Venetian Agostino, but it didn’t turn out very well, and he never allowed any of his works to be engraved again. Returning to the painting, it was just as well-received in France, where it was sent, as it had been in Florence, so much so that the King, driven by an even greater desire for works by Andrea, ordered him to create more pieces, which led Andrea, encouraged by his friends, to plan a trip to France soon.
But meanwhile the Florentines, hearing in the year 1515 that Pope Leo X wished to grace his native city with his presence, ordained for his reception extraordinary festivities and a sumptuous and magnificent spectacle, with so many arches, façades, temples, colossal figures, and other statues and ornaments, that there had never been seen up to that time anything richer, more gorgeous, or more beautiful; for there was then flourishing in that city a greater abundance of fine and exalted intellects than had ever been known at any other period. At the entrance of the Porta di S. Piero Gattolini, Jacopo di Sandro, in company with Baccio da Montelupo, made an arch covered with historical scenes. Giuliano del Tasso made another at S. Felice in Piazza, with some statues and the obelisk of Romulus at S. Trinità, and Trajan's Column in the Mercato Nuovo. In the Piazza de' Signori, Antonio, the brother of Giuliano da San Gallo, erected an octagonal temple, and Baccio Bandinelli made a Giant for the Loggia. Between the Badia and the Palace of the Podestà there was an arch erected by Granaccio and Aristotele da San Gallo, and Il Rosso made another on the Canto de' Bischeri with a very beautiful design and a variety of figures. But what was admired more than everything else was the façade of S. Maria del Fiore, made of wood, and so well decorated with various scenes in chiaroscuro by our Andrea, that nothing more could have been desired. The architecture of this work was by Jacopo Sansovino, as were some scenes in low-relief and many figures carved in the round; and it was declared by the Pope that this structure—which was designed by Lorenzo de' Medici, father of that Pontiff, when he was alive—could not have been more beautiful, even if it had been of marble. [Pg 98] The same Jacopo made a horse similar to the one in Rome, which was held to be a miracle of beauty, on the Piazza di S. Maria Novella. An endless number of ornaments, also, were executed for the Sala del Papa in the Via della Scala, and that street was half filled with most beautiful scenes wrought by the hands of many craftsmen, but designed for the most part by Baccio Bandinelli. Wherefore, when Leo entered Florence, on the third day of September in the same year, this spectacle was pronounced to be the grandest that had ever been devised, and the most beautiful.
But meanwhile, the people of Florence, hearing in 1515 that Pope Leo X wanted to visit his hometown, planned extraordinary celebrations and a lavish spectacle for his arrival, featuring so many arches, façades, temples, colossal figures, and other statues and decorations that nothing richer, more gorgeous, or more beautiful had ever been seen before; because at that time, the city was home to an impressive abundance of talented and brilliant minds unlike any other era. At the entrance of the Porta di S. Piero Gattolini, Jacopo di Sandro, along with Baccio da Montelupo, created an arch adorned with historical scenes. Giuliano del Tasso built another at S. Felice in Piazza, complete with statues and the obelisk of Romulus at S. Trinità, as well as Trajan's Column in the Mercato Nuovo. In the Piazza de' Signori, Antonio, the brother of Giuliano da San Gallo, constructed an octagonal temple, and Baccio Bandinelli made a giant for the Loggia. Between the Badia and the Palace of the Podestà, Granaccio and Aristotele da San Gallo erected an arch, while Il Rosso designed another at the Canto de' Bischeri with a stunning design and a variety of figures. However, the most admired feature was the wooden façade of S. Maria del Fiore, decorated with various chiaroscuro scenes by our Andrea, to the point that nothing more could be desired. The architecture of this work was done by Jacopo Sansovino, who also contributed some low-relief scenes and numerous figures carved in the round; it was said by the Pope that this structure—which had been designed by Lorenzo de' Medici, the father of that Pope, during his lifetime—could not have been more beautiful, even if it were made of marble. [Pg 98] The same Jacopo created a horse similar to the one in Rome, thought to be a marvel of beauty, in the Piazza di S. Maria Novella. An endless array of decorations was also made for the Sala del Papa in the Via della Scala, and that street was filled with breathtaking scenes crafted by many artisans, mostly designed by Baccio Bandinelli. Thus, when Leo entered Florence on September 3 of that same year, this spectacle was declared the grandest and most beautiful ever conceived.
But to return now to Andrea: being again requested to make another picture for the King of France, in a short time he finished one wherein he painted a very beautiful Madonna, which was sent off immediately, the merchants receiving for it four times as much as they had paid. Now at that very time Pier Francesco Borgherini had caused to be made by Baccio d' Agnolo some panelling, chests, chairs, and a bed, all carved in walnut-wood, for the furnishing of an apartment; wherefore, to the end that the paintings therein might be equal in excellence to the rest of the work, he commissioned Andrea to paint part of the scenes on these with figures of no great size, representing the acts of Joseph the son of Jacob, in competition with some of great beauty that had been executed by Granaccio and Jacopo da Pontormo. Andrea, then, devoting an extraordinary amount of time and diligence to the work, strove to bring it about that they should prove to be more perfect than those of the others mentioned above; in which he succeeded to a marvel, for in the variety of events happening in the stories he showed how great was his worth in the art of painting. So excellent were those scenes, that an attempt was made by Giovan Battista della Palla, on account of the siege of Florence, to remove them from the places where they were fixed, in order to send them to the King of France; but, since they were fixed in such a way that it would have meant spoiling the whole work, they were left where they were, together with a picture of Our Lady, which is held to be a very choice work.
But now back to Andrea: once again asked to create another piece for the King of France, he quickly completed a stunning Madonna painting, which was sent off immediately, and the merchants received four times what they had paid for it. At that time, Pier Francesco Borgherini had commissioned Baccio d'Agnolo to make some paneling, chests, chairs, and a bed, all carved from walnut for a room's furnishings. To ensure that the paintings matched the quality of the other work, he hired Andrea to paint some scenes with smaller figures depicting the stories of Joseph, the son of Jacob, aiming to rival beautiful works done by Granaccio and Jacopo da Pontormo. Andrea devoted an incredible amount of time and effort to this task, striving to make them more perfect than the previously mentioned artists' works, and he succeeded remarkably. In the variety of events captured in the stories, he showcased his immense talent in painting. The quality of those scenes was so exceptional that Giovan Battista della Palla tried to remove them for the King of France during the siege of Florence. However, since they were so integrated into the overall work that taking them would ruin everything, they were left in place, along with a painting of Our Lady, which is regarded as a very fine piece.

CHARITY
(After the painting by Andrea del Sarto.
Paris: Louvre, 1514)
Neurdein
View larger image
CHARITY
(After the painting by Andrea del Sarto.
Paris: Louvre, 1514)
Neurdein
View larger image
After this Andrea executed a head of Christ, now kept by the Servite Friars on the altar of the Nunziata, of such beauty, that I for my part do not know whether any more beautiful image of the head of Christ [Pg 99] could be conceived by the intellect of man. For the chapels in the Church of S. Gallo, without the Porta S. Gallo, there had been painted, in addition to the two panel-pictures by Andrea, a number of others, which were not equal to his; wherefore, since there was a commission to be given for another, those friars contrived to persuade the owner of the chapel to give it to Andrea; and he, beginning it immediately, made therein four figures standing, engaged in a disputation about the Trinity. One of these is S. Augustine, who, robed as a Bishop and truly African in aspect, is moving impetuously towards S. Peter Martyr, who is holding up an open book in a proud and sublime attitude: and the head and figure of the latter are much extolled. Beside him is a S. Francis holding a book in one hand and pressing the other against his breast; and he appears to be expressing with his lips a glowing ardour that makes him almost melt away in the heat of the discussion. There is also a S. Laurence, who, being young, is listening, and seems to be yielding to the authority of the others. Below them are two figures kneeling, one a Magdalene with most beautiful draperies, whose countenance is a portrait of Andrea's wife; for in no place did he paint a woman's features without copying them from her, and if perchance it happened at times that he took them from other women, yet, from his being used to see her continually, and from the circumstance that he had drawn her so often, and, what is more, had her impressed on his mind, it came about that almost all the heads of women that he made resembled her. The other kneeling figure is a S. Sebastian, who, being naked, shows his back, which appears to all who see it to be not painted, but of living flesh. And indeed, among so many works in oils, this was held by craftsmen to be the best, for the reason that there may be seen in it signs of careful consideration in the proportions of the figures, and much order in the method, with a sense of fitness in the expressions of the faces, the heads of the young showing sweetness of expression, those of the old hardness, and those of middle age a kind of blend that inclines both to the first and to the second. In a word, this panel is most beautiful in all its parts; and it is now to be found in S. Jacopo tra Fossi on the Canto degli Alberti, together with others by the hand of the same master.
After this, Andrea created a head of Christ, now kept by the Servite Friars on the altar of the Nunziata, that is so beautifully done that I honestly don't know if any other image of Christ's head could be conceived by the mind of man. In the chapels of the Church of S. Gallo, outside Porta S. Gallo, in addition to the two panel paintings by Andrea, there were several others that didn't match his quality. Because of this, when a commission came up for another piece, those friars managed to convince the owner of the chapel to give it to Andrea. He started it right away and created four standing figures engaged in a discussion about the Trinity. One of these is St. Augustine, dressed as a bishop and looking distinctly African, who is moving energetically toward St. Peter Martyr, who holds up an open book with a proud and majestic posture; both his head and figure are highly praised. Beside him is St. Francis, who holds a book in one hand and presses the other against his chest, seemingly expressing a passionate fervor that makes him almost dissolve in the intensity of the discussion. There's also a St. Laurence, who, being young, listens and appears to yield to the authority of the others. Below them are two kneeling figures: one is Mary Magdalene, adorned in beautiful draperies, whose face is a portrait of Andrea's wife; for in every instance he painted a woman’s features, he adapted them from her. Even when he might have used other women as models, his constant exposure to her and having drawn her so often meant that almost all the female heads he created resembled her. The other kneeling figure is St. Sebastian, who, being naked, shows his back, which to onlookers seems not painted, but as if it were living flesh. Among the many oil paintings, this was considered by artisans to be the best because it displays careful consideration in the proportions of the figures, a clear order in the composition, and appropriate expressions on the faces, where the young show sweetness, the old show sternness, and those in middle age reflect a blend of both. In short, this panel is exquisite in every detail; it can now be found in S. Jacopo tra Fossi on the Canto degli Alberti, alongside other works by the same master.
[Pg 100] While Andrea was living poorly enough in Florence, engaged in these works, but without bettering himself a whit, the two pictures that he had sent to France had been duly considered in that country by King Francis I; and among many others which had been sent from Rome, from Venice, and from Lombardy, they had been judged to be by far the best. The King therefore praising them mightily, it was remarked to him that it would be an easy matter to persuade Andrea to come to France to serve his Majesty; which news was so agreeable to the King, that he gave orders that all that was necessary should be done, and that money for the journey should be paid to Andrea in Florence. Andrea then set out for France with a glad heart, taking with him his assistant Andrea Sguazzella; and, having arrived at last at the Court, they were received by the King with great kindness and rejoicing. Before the very day of his arrival had passed by, Andrea proved for himself how great were the courtesy and the liberality of that magnanimous King, receiving presents of money and rich and honourable garments. Beginning to work soon afterwards, he became so dear to the King and to all the Court, that he was treated lovingly by everyone, and it appeared to him that his departure from his country had brought him from one extreme of wretchedness to the other extreme of bliss. Among his first works was a portrait from life of the Dauphin, the son of the King, born only a few months before, and still in swaddling-clothes; and when he took this to the King, he received a present of three hundred gold crowns. Then, continuing to work, he painted for the King a figure of Charity, which was considered a very rare work and was held by that Sovereign in the estimation that it deserved. After that, his Majesty granted him a liberal allowance and did all that he could to induce Andrea to stay willingly with him, promising him that he should never want for anything; and this because he liked Andrea's resoluteness in his work, and also the character of the man, who was contented with everything. Moreover, giving great satisfaction to the whole Court, he executed many pictures and various other works; and if he had kept in mind the condition from which he had escaped and the place to which fortune had brought him, there is no doubt that he would have risen—to say nothing of riches—to a most [Pg 101] honourable rank. But one day, when he was at work on a S. Jerome in Penitence for the mother of the King, there came to him some letters from Florence, written by his wife; and he began, whatever may have been the reason, to think of departing. He sought leave, therefore, from the King, saying that he wished to go to Florence, but would return without fail to his Majesty after settling some affairs; and he would bring his wife with him, in order to live more at his ease in France, and would come back laden with pictures and sculptures of value. The King, trusting in him, gave him money for that purpose; and Andrea swore on the Testament to return to him in a few months.
[Pg 100] While Andrea was struggling in Florence, working hard but not improving his situation at all, the two paintings he had sent to France were recognized by King Francis I. Among many others sent from Rome, Venice, and Lombardy, they were deemed the best. The King praised them highly, and it was suggested to him that it would be easy to persuade Andrea to come to France to serve him. This news pleased the King so much that he ordered everything necessary to be arranged and ensured that money for the journey was given to Andrea in Florence. Andrea then happily set off for France with his assistant, Andrea Sguazzella. Upon arriving at the court, they were welcomed warmly and joyfully by the King. By the end of his first day there, Andrea experienced firsthand the kindness and generosity of that great King, receiving gifts of money and fine clothing. Soon after he began working, he became so beloved by the King and the entire court that everyone treated him affectionately, making him feel that leaving his homeland had taken him from one extreme of misery to the other extreme of happiness. Among his early works was a portrait of the Dauphin, the King's son, who had been born just a few months earlier and was still in swaddling clothes; upon presenting this to the King, Andrea received a gift of three hundred gold crowns. Continuing to work, he painted a figure of Charity for the King, which was recognized as a very rare piece and highly valued by the Sovereign. After that, the King granted him a generous allowance and did everything he could to encourage Andrea to stay willingly, promising that he would never lack for anything; this was due to the King's appreciation for Andrea's dedication to his craft and his agreeable nature. Furthermore, delighting the entire court, he produced many paintings and various other works; had he kept in mind the hardships he had escaped and the fortunate place he had come to, there’s no doubt he would have achieved—not to mention wealth—an illustrious status. However, one day, while working on a St. Jerome in Penitence for the King’s mother, he received letters from Florence written by his wife, and for some reason, he began to consider leaving. He therefore asked the King for permission to go to Florence, saying he wanted to settle some matters but would definitely return afterward; he also planned to bring his wife with him so they could live more comfortably in France and return laden with valuable paintings and sculptures. Trusting him, the King gave Andrea money for this purpose, and Andrea swore on the Testament to come back to him in a few months. [Pg 101]
Thus, then, he arrived in Florence, and for several months blissfully took his joy of his fair lady, his friends, and the city. And finally, the time at which he was to return having passed by, he found in the end that what with building, taking his pleasure, and doing no work, he had squandered all his money and likewise that of the King. Even so he wished to return, but he was more influenced by the sighs and prayers of his wife than by his own necessities and the pledge given to the King, so that, in order to please his wife, he did not go back; at which the King fell into such disdain, that for a long time he would never again look with a favourable eye on any painter from Florence, and he swore that if Andrea ever came into his hands he would give him a very different kind of welcome, with no regard whatever for his abilities. And thus Andrea, remaining in Florence, and sinking from the highest rung of the ladder to the very lowest, lived and passed the time as best he could.
Thus, he arrived in Florence and spent several months happily enjoying his beautiful lady, his friends, and the city. Eventually, when it was time for him to return, he realized that, between building, having fun, and doing no work, he had wasted all his money and also the King’s. Still, he wanted to go back, but he was more swayed by his wife’s sighs and pleas than by his own needs or the promise he made to the King. To please his wife, he didn’t return, which caused the King to become so displeased that he wouldn’t look favorably on any painter from Florence for a long time. He swore that if he ever got his hands on Andrea, he would treat him very differently, showing no regard for his talents. And so, Andrea stayed in Florence, falling from the highest position to the very lowest, living and getting by as best he could.
After Andrea's departure to France, the men of the Scalzo, thinking that he would never return, had entrusted all the rest of the work in their cloister to Franciabigio, who had already executed two scenes there, when, seeing Andrea back in Florence, they persuaded him to set his hand to the work once more; and he, continuing it, painted four scenes, one beside another. In the first is S. John taken before Herod. In the second are the Feast and the Dance of Herodias, with figures very well grouped and appropriate. In the third is the Beheading of S. John, wherein the minister of justice, a half-nude figure, is beautifully drawn, as are all the others. In the fourth Herodias is presenting the head; [Pg 102] and here there are figures expressing their astonishment, which are wrought with most beautiful thought and care. These scenes have been for some time the study and school of many young men who are now excellent in our arts.
After Andrea left for France, the men at Scalzo, thinking he would never come back, handed all the remaining work in their cloister over to Franciabigio, who had already painted two scenes there. When they saw Andrea back in Florence, they convinced him to take on the work again; he then painted four scenes side by side. The first shows St. John being brought before Herod. The second depicts the Feast and the Dance of Herodias, with figures that are well arranged and fitting. The third illustrates the Beheading of St. John, featuring a half-naked figure representing the minister of justice, beautifully drawn, along with all the others. In the fourth scene, Herodias is presenting the head; [Pg 102] and here, figures express their astonishment, crafted with great thought and care. These scenes have been a study and inspiration for many young artists who have become excellent in our crafts.
In a shrine without the Porta a Pinti, at a corner where the road turns towards the Ingesuati, he painted in fresco a Madonna seated with a Child in her arms, and a little S. John who is smiling, a figure wrought with extraordinary art and with such perfect execution, that it is much extolled for its beauty and vivacity; and the head of the Madonna is a portrait of his wife from nature. This shrine, on account of the incredible beauty of the painting, which is truly marvellous, was left standing in 1530, when, because of the siege of Florence, the aforesaid Convent of the Ingesuati was pulled down, together with many other very beautiful buildings.
In a shrine beyond the Porta a Pinti, at a corner where the road bends toward the Ingesuati, he painted a fresco of a Madonna sitting with a Child in her arms, along with a little St. John who is smiling. This figure is crafted with amazing skill and executed so perfectly that it is highly praised for its beauty and liveliness; the head of the Madonna is a lifelike portrait of his wife. This shrine, due to the incredible beauty of the painting, which is truly remarkable, remained intact in 1530 when, because of the siege of Florence, the Convent of the Ingesuati was demolished, along with many other stunning buildings.
About the same time the elder Bartolommeo Panciatichi, who was carrying on a great mercantile business in France, desiring to leave a memorial of himself in Lyons, ordered Baccio d' Agnolo to have a panel painted for him by Andrea, and to send it to him there; saying that he wanted the subject to be the Assumption of Our Lady, with the Apostles about the tomb. This work, then, Andrea carried almost to completion; but since the wood of the panel split apart several times, he would sometimes work at it, and sometimes leave it alone, so that at his death it remained not quite finished. Afterwards it was placed by the younger Bartolommeo Panciatichi in his house, as a work truly worthy of praise on account of the beautiful figures of the Apostles; not to speak of the Madonna, who is surrounded by a choir of little boys standing, while certain others are supporting her and bearing her upwards with extraordinary grace. And in the foreground of the panel, among the Apostles, is a portrait of Andrea, so natural that it seems to be alive. It is now at the villa of the Baroncelli, a little distance from Florence, in a small church built by Piero Salviati near his villa to do honour to the picture.
Around the same time, the older Bartolommeo Panciatichi, who was running a large trading business in France, wanted to leave a lasting memory of himself in Lyons. He asked Baccio d' Agnolo to have a panel painted for him by Andrea and sent there. He requested the subject to be the Assumption of Our Lady, with the Apostles around the tomb. Andrea worked on this piece almost to completion, but because the wood of the panel split several times, he would work on it intermittently. As a result, when he died, it wasn’t fully finished. Later, the younger Bartolommeo Panciatichi placed it in his home, considering it truly praiseworthy due to the beautiful figures of the Apostles—not to mention the Madonna, who is surrounded by a choir of little boys standing while others support and lift her upwards with extraordinary grace. In the foreground of the panel, among the Apostles, there is a portrait of Andrea so lifelike that it seems to be alive. It is now housed at the villa of the Baroncelli, a short distance from Florence, in a small church built by Piero Salviati next to his villa to honor the artwork.
At the head of the garden of the Servi, in two angles, Andrea painted two scenes of Christ's Vineyard, one showing the planting, staking, and binding of the vines, and then the husbandman summoning to the labour [Pg 103] those who were standing idle, among whom is one who, being asked whether he wishes to join the work, sits rubbing his hands and pondering whether he will go among the other labourers, exactly as those idle fellows do who have but little mind to work. Even more beautiful is the other scene, wherein the same husbandman is causing them to be paid, while they murmur and complain, and one among them, who is counting over his money by himself, wholly intent on examining his share, seems absolutely alive, as also does the steward who is paying out the wages. These scenes are in chiaroscuro, and executed with extraordinary mastery in fresco. After them he painted a Pietà, coloured in fresco, which is very beautiful, in a niche at the head of a staircase in the noviciate of the same convent. He also painted another Pietà in a little picture in oils, in addition to a Nativity, for the room in that convent wherein the General, Angelo Aretino, once lived.
At the top of the Servi garden, in two corners, Andrea painted two scenes of Christ's Vineyard. One depicts the planting, staking, and binding of the vines, with the farmer calling to those who are standing around doing nothing. Among them is one person who, when asked if he wants to help, sits there rubbing his hands and thinking about whether to join the workers, just like those slackers who aren't really interested in working. The second scene is even more striking, showing the same farmer paying them while they grumble and complain. One among them is counting his money by himself, completely focused on checking his share, seeming very much alive, as does the steward who is handing out the wages. These scenes are painted in chiaroscuro and executed with remarkable skill in fresco. After that, he painted a beautifully colored fresco of a Pietà in a niche at the top of a staircase in the novitiate of the same convent. He also created another small oil painting of a Pietà, along with a Nativity scene for the room in that convent where General Angelo Aretino once stayed.
The same master painted for Zanobi Bracci, who much desired to have some work by his hand, for one of his apartments, a picture of Our Lady, in which she is on her knees, leaning against a rock, and contemplating Christ, who lies on a heap of drapery and looks up at her, smiling; while a S. John, who stands there, is making a sign to the Madonna, as if to say that her Child is the true Son of God. Behind these figures is a S. Joseph with his head resting on his hands, which are lying on a rock; and he appears to be filled with joy at seeing the human race become divine through that Birth.
The same master painted for Zanobi Bracci, who really wanted to have a piece of his work for one of his rooms, a painting of Our Lady, where she is on her knees, leaning against a rock, and gazing at Christ, who is lying on a pile of fabric and looking up at her, smiling. Meanwhile, Saint John, who stands nearby, gestures to the Madonna as if to indicate that her Child is the true Son of God. Behind these figures is Saint Joseph, resting his head on his hands, which are on a rock; he looks filled with joy at seeing humanity become divine through that Birth.
Cardinal Giulio de' Medici having been commissioned by Pope Leo to see to the adorning with stucco and paintings of the ceiling in the Great Hall of Poggio a Caiano, a palatial villa of the Medici family, situated between Pistoia and Florence, the charge of arranging for that work and of paying out the money was given to the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, as to a person who, not falling short of the standard of his ancestors, was well informed in such matters and a loving friend to all the masters of our arts, and delighted more than any other man to have his dwellings adorned with the works of the most excellent. Ottaviano ordained, therefore, although the commission for the whole work had already been given to Franciabigio, that he should have only a third, [Pg 104] Andrea another, and Jacopo da Pontormo the last. But it was found impossible, for all the efforts that the Magnificent Ottaviano made to urge them on, and for all the money that he offered and even paid to them, to get the work brought to completion; and Andrea alone finished with great diligence a scene on one wall, representing Cæsar being presented with tribute of all kinds of animals. The drawing for this work is in our book, with many others by his hand; it is in chiaroscuro, and is the most finished that he ever made. In this picture Andrea, in order to surpass Franciabigio and Jacopo, subjected himself to unexampled labour, drawing in it a magnificent perspective-view and a very masterly flight of steps, which formed the ascent to the throne of Cæsar. And these steps he adorned with very well-designed statues, not being content with having proved the beauty of his genius in the variety of figures that are carrying on their backs all those different animals, such as the figure of an Indian who is wearing a yellow coat, and carrying on his shoulders a cage drawn in perspective with some parrots both within it and without, the whole being rarely beautiful; and such, also, as some who are leading Indian goats, lions, giraffes, panthers, lynxes, and apes, with Moors and other lovely things of fancy, all grouped in a beautiful manner and executed divinely well in fresco. On these steps, also, he made a dwarf seated and holding a box containing a chameleon, which is so well executed in all the deformity of its fantastic shape, that it is impossible to imagine more beautiful proportions than those that he gave it. But, as has been said, this work remained unfinished, on account of the death of Pope Leo; and although Duke Alessandro de' Medici had a great desire that Jacopo da Pontormo should finish it, he was not able to prevail on him to put his hand to it. And in truth it suffered a very grievous wrong in the failure to complete it, seeing that the hall, for one in a villa, is the most beautiful in the world.
Cardinal Giulio de' Medici was assigned by Pope Leo to decorate the ceiling of the Great Hall at Poggio a Caiano, a Medici villa located between Pistoia and Florence. The responsibility for managing the project and funding it was given to the esteemed Ottaviano de' Medici, who lived up to his family's legacy, was knowledgeable about such projects, and was a devoted friend to the artists, eager to adorn his home with high-quality works. Ottaviano decided that, although Franciabigio had already been commissioned for the entire project, he would only receive one-third of the work; another third would go to Andrea, and the final third to Jacopo da Pontormo. However, despite all of Ottaviano's efforts to push them along and the payments he offered and made, the project was never completed. Only Andrea managed to finish a scene on one wall, depicting Caesar receiving tribute of various animals. The drawing for this work, along with many others by him, is featured in our book; it is in chiaroscuro and is the best work he ever created. To outdo Franciabigio and Jacopo, Andrea put in extraordinary effort, creating a stunning perspective view and an impressive flight of steps leading up to Caesar's throne. He decorated these steps with beautifully designed statues, not content with just showcasing the beauty of his talent in the variety of figures carrying various animals, including an Indian man in a yellow coat carrying a cage rendered in perspective with parrots both inside and outside—the whole composition exceptionally beautiful. There were also figures leading Indian goats, lions, giraffes, panthers, lynxes, and monkeys, along with Moors and other imaginative details, all arranged beautifully and executed flawlessly in fresco. On these steps, he also depicted a dwarf sitting and holding a box with a chameleon, skillfully capturing its wonderfully strange shape, achieving proportions that are hard to imagine being more beautiful. However, as mentioned, this work remained unfinished due to Pope Leo's death. Although Duke Alessandro de' Medici wanted Jacopo da Pontormo to complete it, he couldn't persuade him to take it on. Truly, it suffered a great injustice in not being completed, as the hall, for a villa, is the most beautiful in the world.
After returning to Florence, Andrea painted a picture with a nude half-length figure of S. John the Baptist, a very beautiful thing, which he executed at the commission of Giovan Maria Benintendi, who presented it afterwards to the Lord Duke Cosimo.
After returning to Florence, Andrea painted a half-length nude figure of St. John the Baptist, which was very beautiful. He created it for Giovan Maria Benintendi, who later gifted it to Duke Cosimo.

CÆSAR RECEIVING THE TRIBUTE OF EGYPT
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: Poggio a Caiano)
Alinari
View larger image
CÆSAR RECEIVING THE TRIBUTE OF EGYPT
(After the fresco by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence: Poggio a Caiano)
Alinari
View larger image
While affairs were proceeding in this manner, Andrea, remembering [Pg 105] sometimes his connection with France, sighed from his heart: and if he had hoped to find pardon for the fault he had committed, there is no doubt that he would have gone back. Indeed, to try his fortune, he sought to see whether his talents might be helpful to him in the matter. Thus he painted a picture of a half-naked S. John the Baptist, meaning to send it to the Grand Master of France, to the end that he might occupy himself with restoring the painter to the favour of the King. However, whatever may have been the reason, he never sent it after all, but sold it to the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, who always valued it much as long as he lived, even as he did two pictures of Our Lady executed for him by Andrea in one and the same manner, which are in his house at the present day.
While things were unfolding like this, Andrea, recalling sometimes his connection with France, sighed deeply: and if he had hoped to find forgiveness for the mistake he had made, there's no doubt he would have gone back. In fact, to test his luck, he tried to see if his skills could help him in this situation. So, he painted a picture of a half-naked St. John the Baptist, planning to send it to the Grand Master of France, hoping he might advocate for the artist's return to the King's favor. However, for whatever reason, he never sent it after all, but sold it to the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, who valued it greatly as long as he lived, just like two paintings of Our Lady that Andrea made for him in the same style, which are still in his house today.
Not long afterwards he was commissioned by Zanobi Bracci to paint a picture for Monsignore di San Biause,[6] which he executed with all possible diligence, hoping that it might enable him to regain the favour of King Francis, to whose service he desired to return. He also executed for Lorenzo Jacopi a picture of much greater size than was usual, containing a Madonna seated with the Child in her arms, accompanied by two other figures that are seated on some steps; and the whole, both in drawing and in colouring, is similar to his other works. He painted for Giovanni d' Agostino Dini, likewise, a picture of Our Lady, which is now much esteemed for its beauty; and he made so good a portrait from life of Cosimo Lapi, that it seems absolutely alive.
Not long after, he was hired by Zanobi Bracci to create a painting for Monsignore di San Biause,[6] which he worked on with great care, hoping it would help him win back the favor of King Francis, to whom he wanted to return. He also created a much larger painting for Lorenzo Jacopi, featuring a Madonna seated with the Child in her arms, along with two other figures sitting on some steps; the whole piece, in both design and color, resembles his other works. Additionally, he painted a picture of Our Lady for Giovanni d'Agostino Dini, which is now highly regarded for its beauty; and he did such a great portrait of Cosimo Lapi from life that it looks incredibly lifelike.
Afterwards, in the year 1523, the plague came to Florence and also to some places in the surrounding country; and Andrea, in order to avoid that pestilence and also to do some work, went at the instance of Antonio Brancacci to the Mugello to paint a panel for the Nuns of S. Piero a Luco, of the Order of Camaldoli, taking with him his wife and a stepdaughter, together with his wife's sister and an assistant. Living quietly there, then, he set his hand to the work. And since those venerable ladies showed more and more kindness and courtesy every day to his wife, to himself, and to the whole party, he applied himself with the greatest possible willingness to executing that panel, in which he painted [Pg 106] a Dead Christ mourned by Our Lady, S. John the Evangelist, and the Magdalene, figures so lifelike, that they appear truly to have spirit and breath. In S. John may be seen the loving tenderness of that Apostle, with affection in the tears of the Magdalene, and bitter sorrow in the face and whole attitude of the Madonna, whose aspect, as she gazes on Christ, who seems to be truly a real corpse and in relief, is so pitiful, that she fills with helpless awe and bewilderment the minds of S. Peter and S. Paul, who are contemplating the Dead Saviour of the World in the lap of His mother. From these marvellous conceptions it is clear how much Andrea delighted in finish and perfection of art; and to tell the truth, this panel has given more fame to that convent than all the buildings and all the other costly works, however magnificent and extraordinary, that have been executed there.
Afterwards, in 1523, the plague hit Florence and some nearby areas; and Andrea, wanting to escape the epidemic and also to get some work done, went to Mugello at the request of Antonio Brancacci to paint a panel for the nuns of S. Piero a Luco, part of the Order of Camaldoli. He brought along his wife, a stepdaughter, his wife's sister, and an assistant. While living quietly there, he committed himself to the project. As the kind and gracious nuns continued to show increasing hospitality to his wife, him, and the whole group, he devoted himself wholeheartedly to creating that panel, in which he painted [Pg 106] a Dead Christ mourned by Our Lady, S. John the Evangelist, and the Magdalene. The figures are so lifelike that they seem to have spirit and breath. In S. John, you can see the loving tenderness of that Apostle, with affection shown in the tears of the Magdalene, and bitter sorrow reflected in the face and posture of the Madonna, whose gaze upon Christ, who appears truly lifeless and in relief, is so pitiful that it fills S. Peter and S. Paul, who watch the Dead Savior of the World in His mother’s lap, with helpless awe and confusion. From these incredible creations, it’s clear how much Andrea cherished detail and perfection in his art; and honestly, this panel has brought more fame to that convent than all the buildings and other expensive works, no matter how grand or extraordinary, that have been made there.
This picture finished, Andrea, seeing that the danger of the plague was not yet past, stayed some weeks more in the same place, where he was so well received and treated with such kindness. During that time, in order not to be idle, he painted not only a Visitation of Our Lady to S. Elizabeth, which is in the church, on the right hand above the Manger, serving as a crown to a little ancient panel, but also, on a canvas of no great size, a most beautiful head of Christ, somewhat similar to that on the altar of the Nunziata, but not so finished. This head, which may in truth be numbered among the better works that issued from the hands of Andrea, is now in the Monastery of the Monks of the Angeli at Florence, in the possession of that very reverend father, Don Antonio da Pisa, who loves not only the men of excellence in our arts, but every man of talent without exception. From this picture several copies have been taken, for Don Silvano Razzi entrusted it to the painter Zanobi Poggini, to the end that he might make a copy for Bartolommeo Gondi, who had asked him for one, and some others were made, which are held in vast veneration in Florence.
This picture finished, Andrea, realizing that the threat of the plague was still not over, stayed a few more weeks in the same place, where he was welcomed and treated with great kindness. During that time, to keep himself busy, he painted not only a Visitation of Our Lady to S. Elizabeth, which is in the church on the right above the Manger, serving as a centerpiece to a small ancient panel, but also, on a canvas of modest size, a beautiful head of Christ, somewhat similar to the one on the altar of the Nunziata, but not as polished. This head, which can truly be considered one of the better works that Andrea created, is now in the Monastery of the Monks of the Angeli in Florence, owned by the very reverend father, Don Antonio da Pisa, who appreciates not only the great talents in our arts but every person of talent without exception. From this picture, several copies have been made, as Don Silvano Razzi gave it to the painter Zanobi Poggini to create a copy for Bartolommeo Gondi, who had requested one, and several others were made, which are greatly revered in Florence.
In this manner, then, Andrea passed without danger the time of the plague, and those nuns received from the genius of that great man such a work as can bear comparison with the most excellent pictures that have been painted in our day; wherefore it is no marvel that Ramazzotto, [Pg 107] the captain of mercenaries of Scaricalasino, sought to obtain it on several occasions during the siege of Florence, in order to send it to his chapel in S. Michele in Bosco at Bologna.
In this way, Andrea safely made it through the plague, and those nuns received a masterpiece from the genius of that great man, one that rivals the finest paintings of our time. Therefore, it's no surprise that Ramazzotto, [Pg 107], the captain of mercenaries from Scaricalasino, tried to acquire it several times during the siege of Florence so he could send it to his chapel in S. Michele in Bosco in Bologna.
On his return to Florence, Andrea executed for Beccuccio da Gambassi, the glass-blower, who was very much his friend, a panel-picture of Our Lady in the sky with the Child in her arms, and four figures below, S. John the Baptist, S. Mary Magdalene, S. Sebastian, and S. Rocco; and in the predella he made portraits from nature, which are most lifelike, of Beccuccio and his wife. This panel is now at Gambassi, a township in Valdelsa, between Volterra and Florence. For a chapel in the villa of Zanobi Bracci at Rovezzano, he painted a most beautiful picture of Our Lady suckling a Child, with a Joseph, all executed with such diligence that they stand out from the panel, so strong is the relief; and this picture is now in the house of M. Antonio Bracci, the son of that Zanobi. About the same time, also, and in the above-mentioned cloister of the Scalzo, Andrea painted two other scenes, in one of which he depicted Zacharias offering sacrifice and being made dumb by the Angel appearing to him, while in the other is the Visitation of Our Lady, beautiful to a marvel.
On his return to Florence, Andrea created a panel painting for Beccuccio da Gambassi, the glassblower and a close friend. It features Our Lady in the sky holding the Child, with four figures below: St. John the Baptist, St. Mary Magdalene, St. Sebastian, and St. Rocco. In the predella, he made incredibly lifelike portraits of Beccuccio and his wife. This panel is now in Gambassi, a town in Valdelsa, located between Volterra and Florence. For a chapel in the villa of Zanobi Bracci at Rovezzano, he painted a stunning picture of Our Lady nursing the Child, with Joseph, all done with such meticulous detail that they appear to stand out from the panel due to the strong relief; this picture is now in the home of M. Antonio Bracci, the son of Zanobi. Around the same time, in the previously mentioned cloister of the Scalzo, Andrea painted two other scenes, one showing Zacharias making a sacrifice and being rendered mute by the Angel appearing to him, while the other depicts the Visitation of Our Lady, which is beautifully exquisite.
Now Federigo II, Duke of Mantua, in passing through Florence on his way to make obeisance to Clement VII, saw over a door in the house of the Medici that portrait of Pope Leo between Cardinal Giulio de' Medici and Cardinal de' Rossi, which the most excellent Raffaello da Urbino had formerly painted; and being extraordinarily pleased with it, he resolved, being a man who delighted in pictures of such beauty, to make it his own. And so, when he was in Rome and the moment seemed to him to have come, he asked for it as a present from Pope Clement, who courteously granted his request. Thereupon orders were sent to Florence to Ottaviano de' Medici, under whose care and government were Ippolito and Alessandro, that he should have it packed up and taken to Mantua. This matter was very displeasing to the Magnificent Ottaviano, who would never have consented to deprive Florence of such a picture, and he marvelled that the Pope should have given it up so readily. However, he answered that he would not fail to satisfy the Duke; but that, [Pg 108] since the frame was bad, he was having a new one made, and when it had been gilt he would send the picture with every possible precaution to Mantua. This done, Messer Ottaviano, in order to "save both the goat and the cabbage," as the saying goes, sent privately for Andrea and told him how the matter stood, and how there was no way out of it but to make an exact copy of the picture with the greatest care and send it to the Duke, secretly retaining the one by the hand of Raffaello. Andrea, then, having promised to do all in his power and knowledge, caused a panel to be made similar in size and in every respect, and painted it secretly in the house of Messer Ottaviano. And to such purpose did he labour, that when it was finished even Messer Ottaviano, for all his understanding in matters of art, could not tell the one from the other, nor distinguish the real and true picture from the copy; especially as Andrea had counterfeited even the spots of dirt, exactly as they were in the original. And so, after they had hidden the picture of Raffaello, they sent the one by the hand of Andrea, in a similar frame, to Mantua; at which the Duke was completely satisfied, and above all because the painter Giulio Romano, a disciple of Raffaello, had praised it, failing to detect the trick. This Giulio would always have been of the same opinion, and would have believed it to be by the hand of Raffaello, but for the arrival in Mantua of Giorgio Vasari, who, having been as it were the adoptive child of Messer Ottaviano, and having seen Andrea at work on that picture, revealed the truth. For Giulio making much of Vasari, and showing him, after many antiquities and paintings, that picture of Raffaello's, as the best work that was there, Giorgio said to him, "A beautiful work it is, but in no way by the hand of Raffaello." "What?" answered Giulio. "Should I not know it, when I recognize the very strokes that I made with my own brush?" "You have forgotten them," said Giorgio, "for this picture is by the hand of Andrea del Sarto; and to prove it, there is a sign (to which he pointed) that was made in Florence, because when the two were together they could not be distinguished." Hearing this, Giulio had the picture turned round, and saw the mark; at which he shrugged his shoulders and said these words, "I value it no less than if it were by the hand of Raffaello—nay, even more, for it is something [Pg 109] out of the course of nature that a man of excellence should imitate the manner of another so well, and should make a copy so like. It is enough that it should be known that Andrea's genius was as valiant in double harness as in single." Thus, then, by the wise judgment of Messer Ottaviano, satisfaction was given to the Duke without depriving Florence of so choice a work, which, having been presented to him afterwards by Duke Alessandro, he kept in his possession for many years; and finally he gave it to Duke Cosimo, who has it in his guardaroba together with many other famous pictures.
Now Federigo II, Duke of Mantua, while passing through Florence on his way to pay his respects to Clement VII, noticed a portrait of Pope Leo over a door at the Medici house, flanked by Cardinal Giulio de' Medici and Cardinal de' Rossi, painted by the renowned Raffaello da Urbino. Delighted by its beauty, he decided he wanted it for himself. When he arrived in Rome and felt the moment was right, he asked Pope Clement for the painting as a gift, which Clement graciously granted. Orders were then sent to Florence to Ottaviano de' Medici, who was responsible for Ippolito and Alessandro, instructing him to have it packed and sent to Mantua. This request greatly displeased the distinguished Ottaviano, who would never have agreed to deprive Florence of such a masterpiece, and he was astonished that the Pope had so easily agreed to part with it. Nevertheless, he replied that he would make sure the Duke was satisfied, but that since the frame was in poor condition, he was having a new one made. Once it was finished and gilded, he would send the painting with the utmost care to Mantua. As a clever move to "save both the goat and the cabbage," Ottaviano discreetly called for Andrea and explained the situation, emphasizing that the only way out was to create an exact copy of the painting very carefully and send that to the Duke while secretly keeping the original by Raffaello. Andrea agreed to do everything in his power and proceeded to create a panel that matched the size and details of the original, painting it discreetly at Ottaviano's residence. He worked so diligently that when it was completed, even Ottaviano, despite his keen understanding of art, could not distinguish the original from the copy, especially since Andrea even replicated the spots of dirt found on the original. After hiding Raffaello's painting, Andrea's version was sent to Mantua in a similar frame, leaving the Duke completely satisfied, particularly because Giulio Romano, a student of Raffaello, praised it without realizing the deception. Giulio would have always believed it to be Raffaello’s work, had it not been for the arrival of Giorgio Vasari, who, having been like a protégée of Ottaviano and aware of Andrea's work on the painting, revealed the truth. When Giulio, showing Vasari various antiquities and artworks, highlighted this Raffaello painting as the finest piece, Giorgio commented, "It is a beautiful work, but it’s definitely not by Raffaello." "What?" responded Giulio. "How could I not recognize it? I know the very strokes I made myself!" Giorgio replied, "You've forgotten them, for this painting was made by Andrea del Sarto; and to prove it, look at this mark (pointing to it) made in Florence, because when the two were together, they were indistinguishable." Upon hearing this, Giulio examined the painting closely and noticed the mark; he shrugged and said, "I value it just as much as if it were by Raffaello—actually, even more so, for it’s remarkable that a talented artist could so perfectly imitate another's style and create such a close replica. It’s enough to recognize that Andrea’s talent is just as impressive in this double role as it is in single." Thus, thanks to the wise decision of Ottaviano, the Duke was satisfied without taking this exquisite piece from Florence. Later, Duke Alessandro presented it to him, and he kept it for many years, eventually giving it to Duke Cosimo, who now displays it in his collection along with many other famous artworks.
While Andrea was making this copy, he also painted for the same Messer Ottaviano a picture with only the head of Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, who afterwards became Pope Clement; and this head, which was similar to that by Raffaello, and very beautiful, was presented eventually by Messer Ottaviano to old Bishop de' Marzi.
While Andrea was making this copy, he also painted a portrait for the same Messer Ottaviano featuring just the head of Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, who later became Pope Clement. This head, which resembled Raffaello's and was very beautiful, was eventually given by Messer Ottaviano to the elderly Bishop de' Marzi.
Not long after, Messer Baldo Magini of Prato desiring to have a most beautiful panel-picture painted for the Madonna delle Carcere in his native city, for which he had already caused a very handsome ornament of marble to be made, one of the many painters proposed to him was Andrea. Wherefore Messer Baldo, having more inclination for him than for any of the others, although he had no great understanding in such a matter, had almost given him to believe that he and no other should do the work, when a certain Niccolò Soggi of Sansovino, who had some interest at Prato, was suggested to Messer Baldo for the undertaking, and assisted to such purpose by the assertion that there was not a better master to be found, that the work was given to him. Meanwhile, Andrea's supporters sending for him, he, holding it as settled that the work was to be his, went off to Prato with Domenico Puligo and other painters who were his friends. Arriving there, he found that Niccolò not only had persuaded Messer Baldo to change his mind, but also was bold and shameless enough to say to him in the presence of Messer Baldo that he would compete with Andrea for a bet of any sum of money in painting something, the winner to take the whole. Andrea, who knew what Niccolò was worth, answered, although he was generally a man of little spirit, "Here is my assistant, who has not been long in our art. If you [Pg 110] will bet with him, I will put down the money for him; but with me you shall have no bet for any money in the world, seeing that, if I were to beat you, it would do me no honour, and if I were to lose, it would be the greatest possible disgrace." And, saying to Messer Baldo that he should give the work to Niccolò, because he would execute it in such a manner as would please the folk that went to market, he returned to Florence.
Not long after, Messer Baldo Magini from Prato wanted a beautiful panel painting for the Madonna delle Carcere in his hometown. He had already arranged for a lovely marble ornament for it, and one of the painters he considered was Andrea. Since Messer Baldo preferred Andrea over the others, even though he didn’t know much about art, he almost convinced Andrea that he would get the job. However, a certain Niccolò Soggi from Sansovino, who had connections in Prato, was recommended to Messer Baldo for the project. He was backed up by claims that there was no better master available, so the work was given to Niccolò. Meanwhile, Andrea's supporters called for him, and believing the project was his, he headed to Prato with Domenico Puligo and other painter friends. When he arrived, he discovered that Niccolò had not only changed Messer Baldo’s mind but also had the audacity to challenge Andrea to a competition for a cash bet, promising the winner would take it all. Although Andrea was generally mild-mannered, he replied, “Here’s my assistant, who hasn’t been in our field for long. If you want to bet with him, I’ll cover his stake; but I won’t bet with you for any amount of money, because if I win, it won’t bring me respect, and if I lose, it would be a huge shame.” He then told Messer Baldo to give the project to Niccolò since he would complete it in a way that would please the local market-goers, and he returned to Florence.
There he was commissioned to paint a panel for Pisa, divided into five pictures, which were afterwards placed round the Madonna of S. Agnese, beside the walls of that city, between the old Citadel and the Duomo. Making one figure, then, in each picture, he painted in two of them S. John the Baptist and S. Peter, one on either side of the Madonna that works miracles; and in the others are S. Catharine the Martyr, S. Agnese, and S. Margaret, each a figure by itself, and all so beautiful as to fill with marvel anyone who beholds them, and considered to be the most gracious and lovely women that he ever painted.
There he was tasked with creating a panel for Pisa, split into five images, which were later placed around the Madonna of S. Agnese, beside the city walls, between the old Citadel and the Duomo. In each image, he painted one figure: in two of them, he depicted S. John the Baptist and S. Peter, one on each side of the miracle-working Madonna; and in the others, he portrayed S. Catharine the Martyr, S. Agnese, and S. Margaret, each as a separate figure, all so beautiful that they amazed anyone who saw them, and they were considered the most graceful and lovely women he ever painted.
M. Jacopo, a Servite friar, in releasing and absolving a woman from a vow, had told her that she must have a figure of Our Lady painted over the outer side of that lateral door of the Nunziata which leads into the cloister; and therefore, finding Andrea, he said to him that he had this money to spend, and that although it was not much it seemed to him right, since the other works executed by Andrea in that place had brought him such fame, that he and no other should paint this one as well. Andrea, who was nothing if not an amiable man, moved by the persuasions of the friar and by his own desire for profit and glory, answered that he would do it willingly; and shortly afterwards, putting his hand to the work, he painted in fresco a most beautiful Madonna seated with her Son in her arms, and S. Joseph leaning on a sack, with his eyes fixed upon an open book. And of such a kind was this work, in draughtsmanship, grace, and beauty of colouring, as well as in vivacity and relief, that it proved that he outstripped and surpassed by a great measure all the painters who had worked up to that time. Such, indeed, is this picture, that by its own merit and without praise from any other quarter it makes itself clearly known as amazing and most rare.
M. Jacopo, a Servite friar, while releasing and absolving a woman from a vow, told her that she needed to have an image of Our Lady painted on the outer side of that lateral door of the Nunziata that leads into the cloister. So, when he found Andrea, he mentioned he had some money to spend. Although it wasn’t much, he thought it was fair since Andrea's other works in that location had brought him so much fame, and that he should be the one to paint this one too. Andrea, always a friendly guy, motivated by the friar's persuasion and his own desire for profit and recognition, agreed to do it happily. Soon after, he began the work and painted a stunning fresco of Madonna holding her Son in her arms, with St. Joseph leaning on a sack, his eyes fixed on an open book. This work was so impressive in its drawing, grace, and color, as well as in its liveliness and relief, that it clearly showed he surpassed all the painters who had come before him. Indeed, this painting, by its own merit and without any outside praise, stands out as remarkable and truly unique.
[Pg 111] There was wanting only one scene in the cloister of the Scalzo for it to be completely finished; wherefore Andrea, who had added grandeur to his manner after having seen the figures that Michelagnolo had begun and partly finished for the Sacristy of S. Lorenzo, set his hand to executing this last scene. In this, giving the final proof of his improvement, he painted the Birth of S. John the Baptist, with figures that were very beautiful and much better and stronger in relief than the others made by him before in the same place. Most beautiful, among others in this work, are a woman who is carrying the newborn babe to the bed on which lies S. Elizabeth, who is likewise a most lovely figure, and Zacharias, who is writing on a paper that he has placed on his knee, holding it with one hand and with the other writing the name of his son, and all with such vivacity, that he lacks nothing save the breath of life. Most beautiful, also, is an old woman who is seated on a stool, smiling with gladness at the delivery of the other aged woman, and revealing in her attitude and expression all that would be seen in a living person after such an event.
[Pg 111] There was just one scene missing in the cloister of the Scalzo for it to be completely finished; so, Andrea, who had elevated his style after seeing the figures that Michelangelo had started and partially completed for the Sacristy of S. Lorenzo, took it upon himself to create this final scene. In this piece, showcasing his growth, he painted the Birth of S. John the Baptist, featuring figures that were exceptionally beautiful and much more vividly three-dimensional than his previous works in the same location. Among the highlights of this artwork is a woman carrying the newborn baby to the bed where S. Elizabeth lies, who is also depicted as a stunning figure, and Zacharias, who is writing on a piece of paper resting on his knee, holding it with one hand while he writes his son's name with the other, all portrayed with such vibrancy that he seems to be just a breath away from life. Another lovely detail is an old woman sitting on a stool, smiling with joy at the delivery of the other elderly woman, her posture and expression conveying the same emotions one would witness in a living person after such a momentous event.
Having finished that work, which is certainly well worthy of all praise, he painted for the General of Vallombrosa a panel-picture with four very lovely figures, S. John the Baptist, S. Giovanni Gualberto, founder of that Order, S. Michelagnolo, and S. Bernardo, a Cardinal and a monk of the Order, with some little boys in the centre that could not be more vivacious or more beautiful. This panel is at Vallombrosa, on the summit of a rocky height, where certain monks live in some rooms called "the cells," separated from the others, and leading as it were the lives of hermits.
Having finished that work, which is certainly deserving of all praise, he painted a panel for the General of Vallombrosa featuring four beautiful figures: St. John the Baptist, St. Giovanni Gualberto, the founder of that Order, St. Michelagnolo, and St. Bernardo, a Cardinal and monk of the Order, along with some little boys in the center who are lively and lovely. This panel is located in Vallombrosa, at the top of a rocky height, where certain monks live in rooms known as "the cells," separated from the others and leading lives similar to hermits.
After this he was commissioned by Giuliano Scala to paint a panel-picture, which was to be sent to Serrazzana, of a Madonna seated with the Child in her arms, and two half-length figures from the knees upwards, S. Celso and S. Julia, with S. Onofrio, S. Catharine, S. Benedict, S. Anthony of Padua, S. Peter, and S. Mark; which panel was held to be equal to the other works of Andrea. And in the hands of Giuliano Scala, in place of the balance due to him of a sum of money that he had paid for the owners of that work, there remained a lunette containing an Annunciation, which was to go above the panel, to complete it; and it is now [Pg 112] in his chapel in the great tribune round the choir of the Church of the Servi.
After this, Giuliano Scala hired him to create a panel painting intended for Serrazzana, depicting a Madonna holding the Child in her arms, along with two half-length figures from the knees up: St. Celso and St. Julia, along with St. Onofrio, St. Catharine, St. Benedict, St. Anthony of Padua, St. Peter, and St. Mark. This panel was considered equal to Andrea's other works. Instead of the money he was owed for paying the owners of that work, Giuliano Scala kept a lunette featuring an Annunciation to go above the panel, completing it; it is now [Pg 112] in his chapel in the large tribune around the choir of the Church of the Servi.
The Monks of S. Salvi had let many years pass by without thinking of having a beginning made with their Last Supper, which they had commissioned Andrea to execute at the time when he painted the arch with the four figures; but finally an Abbot, who was a man of judgment and breeding, determined that he should finish that work. Thereupon Andrea, who had already pledged himself to it on a previous occasion, far from making any demur, put his hand to the task, and, working at it one piece at a time when he felt so inclined, finished it in a few months, and that in such a manner, that the work was held to be, as it certainly is, the most spontaneous and the most vivacious in colouring and drawing that he ever made, or that ever could be made. For, among other things, he gave infinite grandeur, majesty, and grace to all the figures, insomuch that I know not what to say of this Last Supper that would not be too little, it being such that whoever sees it is struck with amazement. Wherefore it is no marvel that on account of its excellence it was left standing amid the havoc of the siege of Florence, in the year 1529, at which time the soldiers and destroyers, by command of those in authority, pulled down all the suburbs without the city, and all the monasteries, hospitals, and other buildings. These men, I say, having destroyed the Church and Campanile of S. Salvi, and beginning to throw down part of the convent, had come to the refectory where this Last Supper is, when their leader, seeing so marvellous a painting, of which he may have heard speak, abandoned the undertaking and would not let any more of that place be destroyed, reserving the task until such time as there should be no alternative.
The monks of St. Salvi let many years go by without starting the Last Supper that they had asked Andrea to create when he painted the arch with the four figures. Eventually, an abbot who was discerning and cultured decided it was time to finish the work. Andrea, who had already committed to it earlier, didn’t hesitate and got right to work. He tackled it piece by piece whenever he felt inspired and completed it in a few months. The result was so remarkable that it is considered, and rightly so, the most spontaneous and vibrant in color and drawing that he ever produced or could ever produce. Among other things, he infused infinite grandeur, majesty, and grace into all the figures, to the point that I cannot find words that do justice to this Last Supper; it’s so striking that anyone who sees it is filled with awe. Therefore, it’s no surprise that due to its excellence, it remained intact during the destruction that occurred during the siege of Florence in 1529. At that time, soldiers, following orders from their superiors, demolished all the suburbs outside the city, along with monasteries, hospitals, and other buildings. These soldiers, after destroying St. Salvi’s church and bell tower and beginning to tear down part of the convent, came to the refectory where this Last Supper is located. Upon seeing such a magnificent painting, which he might have heard about, their leader abandoned the demolition and ordered that the rest of the place be spared, reserving further destruction for a time when there would be no other choice.

PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST
(After the painting on a tile by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence:
Uffizi, 280)
Alinari
View larger image
PORTRAIT OF THE ARTIST
(After the painting on a tile by Andrea del Sarto.
Florence:
Uffizi, 280)
Alinari
View larger image
Andrea then painted for the Company of S. Jacopo, called the Nicchio, on a banner for carrying in processions, a S. James fondling a little boy dressed as a Flagellant by stroking him under the chin, with another boy who has a book in his hand, executed with beautiful grace and naturalness. He made a portrait from life of a steward of the Monks of Vallombrosa, who lived almost always in the country on the affairs of his monastery; and this portrait was placed under a sort of bower, in [Pg 113] which he had made pergole and contrivances of his own in various fanciful designs, so that it was buffeted by wind and rain, according to the pleasure of that steward, who was the friend of Andrea. And because, when the work was finished, there were some colours and lime left over, Andrea, taking a tile, called to his wife Lucrezia and said to her: "Come here, for these colours are left over, and I wish to make your portrait, so that all may see how well you have preserved your beauty even at your time of life, and yet may know how your appearance has changed, which will make this one different from your early portraits." But the woman, who may have had something else in her mind, would not stand still; and Andrea, as it were from a feeling that he was near his end, took a mirror and made a portrait of himself on that tile, of such perfection, that it seems alive and as real as nature; and that portrait is in the possession of the same Madonna Lucrezia, who is still living.
Andrea then painted for the Company of S. Jacopo, known as the Nicchio, a banner for processions depicting St. James with a little boy dressed as a Flagellant, gently stroking him under the chin, alongside another boy holding a book, created with beautiful grace and naturalness. He made a life portrait of a steward from the Monks of Vallombrosa, who mostly lived in the countryside managing his monastery; this portrait was placed under a kind of bower, in [Pg 113] which he designed himself with various fanciful structures, so it could withstand the wind and rain, according to the whims of the steward, who was a friend of Andrea. And because, when the work was finished, some colors and lime were left over, Andrea took a tile, called for his wife Lucrezia, and said to her: "Come here, I have these colors left, and I want to make your portrait, so everyone can see how well you’ve maintained your beauty at this point in your life, and also know how your appearance has changed, which will make this portrait different from your earlier ones." But the woman, perhaps preoccupied with something else, wouldn’t stay still; and Andrea, feeling that his time might be near, took a mirror and painted a self-portrait on that tile, so perfect that it seems alive and as real as nature; that portrait is now with the same Madonna Lucrezia, who is still alive.
He also portrayed a Canon of Pisa, very much his friend; and the portrait, which is lifelike and very beautiful, is still in Pisa. He then began for the Signoria the cartoons for the paintings to be executed on the balustrades of the Ringhiera in the Piazza, with many beautiful things of fancy to represent the quarters of the city, and with the banners of the Consuls of the chief Guilds supported by some little boys, and also ornaments in the form of images of all the virtues, and likewise the most famous mountains and rivers of the dominion of Florence. But this work, thus begun, remained unfinished on account of Andrea's death, as was also the case with a panel—although it was all but finished—which he painted for the Abbey of the Monks of Vallombrosa at Poppi in the Casentino. In that panel he painted an Assumption of Our Lady, who is surrounded by many little boys, with S. Giovanni Gualberto, S. Bernardo the Cardinal (a monk of their Order, as has been related), S. Catharine, and S. Fedele; and, unfinished as it is, the picture is now in that Abbey of Poppi. The same happened to a panel of no great size, which, when finished, was to have gone to Pisa. But he left completely finished a very beautiful picture which is now in the house of Filippo Salviati, and some others.
He also painted a Canon from Pisa, who was a close friend of his; the portrait, which is realistic and very beautiful, still exists in Pisa. He then started creating sketches for the paintings that were to be done on the balustrades of the Ringhiera in the Piazza, featuring many imaginative elements representing the city’s districts, with the banners of the Consuls from the main Guilds held up by some little boys, along with decorations depicting all the virtues, and the most famous mountains and rivers in the Florence area. However, this project was left unfinished due to Andrea's death, as was a panel that was nearly done, which he painted for the Vallombrosan Monks' Abbey in Poppi, Casentino. In that panel, he depicted the Assumption of Our Lady, surrounded by many little boys, along with St. John Gualberto, St. Bernard the Cardinal (a monk of their Order, as mentioned), St. Catherine, and St. Fidelis; and although it’s unfinished, the picture is now in that Abbey in Poppi. The same situation occurred with a small panel that was meant to be sent to Pisa once completed. However, he completed a very beautiful painting that is now in the home of Filippo Salviati, along with some others.
[Pg 114] About the same time Giovan Battista della Palla, having bought all the sculptures and pictures of note that he could obtain, and causing copies to be made of those that he could not buy, had despoiled Florence of a vast number of choice works, without the least scruple, in order to furnish a suite of rooms for the King of France, which was to be richer in suchlike ornaments than any other in the world. And this man, desiring that Andrea should return to the service and favour of the King, commissioned him to paint two pictures. In one of these Andrea painted Abraham in the act of trying to sacrifice his son; and that with such diligence, that it was judged that up to that time he had never done anything better. Beautifully expressed in the figure of the patriarch was seen that living and steadfast faith which made him ready without a moment of dismay or hesitation to slay his own son. The same Abraham, likewise, could be seen turning his head towards a very beautiful little angel, who appeared to be bidding him stay his hand. I will not describe the attitude, the dress, the foot-wear, and other details in the painting of that old man, because it is not possible to say enough of them; but this I must say, that the boy Isaac, tender and most beautiful, was to be seen all naked, trembling with the fear of death, and almost dead without having been struck. The same boy had only the neck browned by the heat of the sun, and white as snow those parts that his draperies had covered during the three days' journey. In like manner, the ram among the thorns seemed to be alive, and Isaac's draperies on the ground rather real and natural than painted. And in addition there were some naked servants guarding an ass that was browsing, and a landscape so well represented that the real scene of the event could not have been more beautiful or in any way different. This picture, having been bought by Filippo Strozzi after the death of Andrea and the capture of Battista, was presented by him to Signor Alfonso Davalos, Marchese del Vasto, who had it carried to the island of Ischia, near Naples, and placed in one of his apartments in company with other most noble paintings.
[Pg 114] Around the same time, Giovan Battista della Palla bought all the notable sculptures and paintings he could find, and had copies made of the ones he couldn’t buy, stripping Florence of a vast number of exceptional works without a trace of remorse, all to furnish a suite of rooms for the King of France that would be more ornate than any other in the world. This man, wishing for Andrea to regain the King's service and favor, commissioned him to paint two pictures. In one of these, Andrea depicted Abraham attempting to sacrifice his son, and he executed it with such diligence that it was thought to be the best work he had done up to that point. The figure of the patriarch expressed a living and unwavering faith that made him ready, without a moment's doubt or hesitation, to slaughter his own son. Abraham was also shown turning his head towards a beautiful little angel, who seemed to be urging him to stop. I won’t detail the old man's posture, attire, footwear, and other aspects of the painting because there’s just too much to describe; however, I must point out that the boy Isaac looked delicate and stunning, completely naked, trembling in fear of death, and almost lifeless without having been struck. His neck was tanned from the sun, while the parts covered by his clothes during the three-day journey were as white as snow. Similarly, the ram caught in the thorns appeared to be alive, and Isaac's draperies on the ground looked more real and natural than painted. Additionally, there were some naked servants watching over a donkey that was grazing, and a landscape so beautifully rendered that it couldn’t have been more stunning or different from the real scene of the event. This painting, having been purchased by Filippo Strozzi after Andrea's death and Battista's capture, was presented to Signor Alfonso Davalos, Marchese del Vasto, who had it taken to the island of Ischia, near Naples, where it was hung in one of his rooms alongside other esteemed paintings.
In the other picture Andrea painted a very beautiful Charity, with three little boys; and this was afterwards bought from the wife of Andrea, [Pg 115] after his death, by the painter Domenico Conti, who sold it later to Niccolò Antinori, who treasures it as a rare work, as indeed it is.
In the other painting, Andrea created a stunning depiction of Charity, featuring three small boys. After Andrea's death, his wife sold it to the painter Domenico Conti, who later sold it to Niccolò Antinori. He values it highly as a rare piece, which it truly is.
During this time there came to the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, seeing from that last picture how much Andrea had improved his manner, a desire to have a picture by his hand. Whereupon Andrea, who was eager to serve that lord, to whom he was much indebted, because he had always shown favour to men of lofty intellect, and particularly to painters, executed for him a picture of Our Lady seated on the ground with the Child riding astride on her knees, while He turns His head towards a little S. John supported by an old S. Elizabeth, a figure so natural and so well painted that she appears to be alive, even as every other thing is wrought with incredible diligence, draughtsmanship, and art. Having finished this picture, Andrea carried it to Messer Ottaviano; but since that lord had something else to think about, Florence being then besieged, he told Andrea, while thanking him profoundly and making his excuses, to dispose of it as he thought best. To which Andrea made no reply but this: "The labour was endured for you, and yours the work shall always be." "Sell it," answered Messer Ottaviano, "and use the money, for I know what I am talking about." Andrea then departed and returned to his house, nor would he ever give the picture to anyone, for all the offers that were made to him; but when the siege was raised and the Medici back in Florence, he took it once more to Messer Ottaviano, who accepted it right willingly, thanking him and paying him double. The work is now in the apartment of his wife, Madonna Francesca, sister to the very reverend Salviati, who holds the beautiful pictures left to her by her magnificent consort in no less account than she does the duty of retaining and honouring his friends.
During this time, the impressive Ottaviano de' Medici saw how much Andrea had improved his style from the last painting and wanted to have a piece by him. Andrea, eager to serve this lord who had always supported people with great intellect, especially painters, created a painting of Our Lady sitting on the ground with the Child on her knees, looking over at a young St. John being held by an older St. Elizabeth. The figure was so natural and beautifully painted that she seemed alive, just like everything else in the work, crafted with incredible care, skill, and artistry. Once Andrea finished the painting, he brought it to Messer Ottaviano. However, since the lord had other concerns due to the siege of Florence, he thanked Andrea sincerely and excused himself, telling him to sell it as he saw fit. Andrea replied, "The work was done for you, and it will always belong to you." Messer Ottaviano insisted, "Sell it and use the money; I know what I’m saying." Andrea then left and went home, never giving the painting to anyone despite many offers. Once the siege was lifted and the Medici returned to Florence, he took it back to Messer Ottaviano, who gladly accepted it, thanked him, and paid him double. The artwork is now in the apartment of his wife, Madonna Francesca, sister to the very reverend Salviati, who values the beautiful paintings left to her by her magnificent husband just as much as her duty to keep and honor his friends.
For Giovanni Borgherini Andrea painted another picture almost exactly like the one of Charity mentioned above, containing a Madonna, a little S. John offering to Christ a globe that represents the world, and a very beautiful head of S. Joseph.
For Giovanni Borgherini, Andrea painted another picture that was almost exactly like the one of Charity mentioned above, featuring a Madonna, a small St. John presenting Christ with a globe that represents the world, and a very beautiful head of St. Joseph.
There came to Paolo da Terrarossa, a friend to the whole body of painters, who had seen the sketch for the aforesaid Abraham, a wish to have some work by the hand of Andrea. Having therefore asked him [Pg 116] for a copy of that Abraham, Andrea willingly obliged him and made a copy of such a kind, that in its minuteness it was by no means inferior to the large original. Wherefore Paolo, well satisfied with it and wishing to pay him, asked him the price, thinking that it would cost him what it was certainly worth; but Andrea asked a mere song, and Paolo, almost ashamed, shrugged his shoulders and gave him all that he claimed. The picture was afterwards sent by him to Naples ...[7] and it is the most beautiful and the most highly honoured painting in that place.
Paolo da Terrarossa, a friend to all painters, had seen the sketch of Abraham and wanted to have a piece of work from Andrea. So, he asked Andrea for a copy of that Abraham. Andrea gladly agreed and created a copy that was so detailed it was just as good as the large original. Paolo, pleased with the result and wanting to pay him, inquired about the price, expecting it to be quite high; but Andrea asked for barely anything, and Paolo, feeling a bit embarrassed, shrugged and paid him what he asked. The painting was later sent by him to Naples, and it is the most beautiful and highly regarded painting there.
During the siege of Florence some captains had fled the city with the pay-chests; on which account Andrea was asked to paint on the façade of the Palace of the Podestà and in the Piazza not only those captains, but also some citizens who had fled and had been proclaimed outlaws. He said that he would do it; but in order not to acquire, like Andrea dal Castagno, the name of Andrea degl' Impiccati, he gave it out that he was entrusting the work to one of his assistants, called Bernardo del Buda. However, having made a great enclosure, which he himself entered and left by night, he executed those figures in such a manner that they appeared to be the men themselves, real and alive. The soldiers, who were painted on the façade of the old Mercatanzia in the Piazza, near the Condotta, were covered with whitewash many years ago, that they might be seen no longer; and the citizens, whom he painted entirely with his own hand on the Palace of the Podestà, were destroyed in like manner.
During the siege of Florence, some captains had abandoned the city with the pay-chests. Because of this, Andrea was asked to paint on the façade of the Palace of the Podestà and in the Piazza, not only those captains but also some citizens who had fled and were declared outlaws. He agreed to do it; however, to avoid being known, like Andrea dal Castagno, as Andrea degl' Impiccati, he claimed that he was assigning the work to one of his assistants named Bernardo del Buda. Despite this, he built a large enclosure, which he entered and exited at night, and painted the figures in such a way that they looked like real, living men. The soldiers he painted on the façade of the old Mercatanzia in the Piazza, near the Condotta, were covered with whitewash many years ago so they couldn't be seen anymore; and the citizens, whom he painted entirely by hand on the Palace of the Podestà, were similarly destroyed.
After this, being very intimate in these last years of his life with certain men who governed the Company of S. Sebastiano, which is behind the Servite Convent, Andrea made for them with his own hand a S. Sebastian from the navel upwards, so beautiful that it might well have seemed that these were the last strokes of the brush which he was to make.
After this, being very close in these last years of his life with certain men who ran the Company of St. Sebastian, which is behind the Servite Convent, Andrea made for them with his own hand a St. Sebastian from the navel up, so beautiful that it might have seemed like these were the last strokes of the brush he would ever make.
The siege being finished, Andrea was waiting for matters to mend, although with little hope that his French project would succeed, since Giovan Battista della Palla had been taken prisoner, when Florence became filled with soldiers and stores from the camp. Among those soldiers were [Pg 117] some lansquenets sick of the plague, who brought no little terror into the city and shortly afterwards left it infected. Thereupon, either through this apprehension or through some imprudence in eating after having suffered much privation in the siege, one day Andrea fell grievously ill and took to his bed with death on his brow; and finding no remedy for his illness, and being without much attention—for his wife, from fear of the plague, kept as far away from him as she could—he died, so it is said, almost without a soul being aware of it; and he was buried by the men of the Scalzo with scant ceremony in the Church of the Servi, near his own house, in the place where the members of that Company are always buried.
The siege was over, and Andrea was hoping things would get better, though he had little faith that his French plan would work since Giovan Battista della Palla had been captured, and Florence was now filled with soldiers and supplies from the camp. Among those soldiers were [Pg 117] some lansquenets sick with the plague, who spread a lot of fear in the city and soon left it infected. Either because of this fear or due to some poor choices in eating after enduring a lot of hunger during the siege, one day Andrea fell seriously ill and went to bed looking like death. Finding no cure for his sickness, and receiving little care—his wife, fearing the plague, stayed as far away from him as possible—he died, reportedly almost unnoticed. He was buried by the Scalzo men with minimal ceremony in the Church of the Servi, near his home, in the spot where the members of that Company are always laid to rest.
The death of Andrea was a very great loss to the city and to art, because up to the age of forty-two, which he attained, he went on always improving from one work to another in such wise that, if he had lived longer, he would have continued to confer benefits on art; for the reason that it is better to go on making progress little by little, advancing with a firm and steady foot through the difficulties of art, than to seek to force one's intellect and nature in a single effort. Nor is there any doubt that if Andrea had stayed in Rome when he went there to see the works of Raffaello and Michelagnolo, and also the statues and ruins of that city, he would have enriched his manner greatly in the composition of scenes, and would one day have given more delicacy and greater force to his figures; which has never been thoroughly achieved save by one who has been some time in Rome, to study those works in detail and grow familiar with them. Having then from nature a sweet and gracious manner of drawing and great facility and vivacity of colouring, both in fresco-work and in oils, it is believed without a doubt that if he had stayed in Rome, he would have surpassed all the craftsmen of his time. But some believe that he was deterred from this by the abundance of works of sculpture and painting, both ancient and modern, that he saw in that city, and by observing the many young men, disciples of Raffaello and of others, resolute in draughtsmanship and working confidently and without effort, whom, like the timid fellow that he was, he did not feel it in him to excel. And so, not trusting himself, he resolved, as the best course for him, to [Pg 118] return to Florence; where, reflecting little by little on what he had seen, he made such proficience that his works have been admired and held in price, and, what is more, imitated more often after his death than during his lifetime. Whoever has some holds them dear, and whoever has consented to sell them has received three times as much as was paid to him, for the reason that he never received anything but small prices for his works, both because he was timid by nature, as has been related, and also because certain master-joiners, who were executing the best works at that time in the houses of citizens, would never allow any commission to be given to Andrea (so as to oblige their friends), save when they knew that he was in great straits, for at such times he would accept any price. But this does not prevent his works from being most rare, or from being held in very great account, and that rightly, since he was one of the best and greatest masters who have lived even to our own day. In our book are many drawings by his hand, all good; but in particular there is one that is altogether beautiful, of the scene that he painted at Poggio, showing the tribute of all the animals from the East being presented to Cæsar. This drawing, which is executed in chiaroscuro, is a rare thing, and the most finished that Andrea ever made; for when he drew natural objects for reproduction in his works, he made mere sketches dashed off on the spot, contenting himself with marking the character of the reality; and afterwards, when reproducing them in his works, he brought them to perfection. His drawings, therefore, served him rather as memoranda of what he had seen than as models from which to make exact copies in his pictures.
The death of Andrea was a huge loss for the city and for art. Up until he was forty-two, he consistently improved from one piece to another, and if he had lived longer, he would have continued to benefit art. It’s better to progress gradually and steadily through the challenges of art than to force one's creativity in a single burst. There’s no doubt that if Andrea had stayed in Rome when he went to see the works of Raffaello and Michelagnolo, along with the city’s statues and ruins, he would have greatly enhanced his style in composing scenes, eventually bringing more delicacy and strength to his figures. This level of achievement usually comes only to those who have spent time in Rome, studying the works closely and becoming familiar with them. Andrea had a naturally sweet and graceful drawing style, along with great skill and vibrancy in both fresco and oil painting. It’s widely believed that if he had remained in Rome, he would have outshone all the craftsmen of his time. However, some think he was discouraged by the overwhelming number of ancient and modern sculptures and paintings in the city. He saw many young artists, students of Raffaello and others, who were confident in their drawing skills and worked effortlessly. Being a bit timid, he didn’t feel capable of excelling among them, so he chose, as the best course for himself, to return to Florence. There, reflecting on what he had seen, he made such advancements that his works became admired and valued, and even more imitated after his death than during his life. Those who own his pieces treasure them, and anyone who has sold them received three times the price they were paid. He only ever received low prices for his works, partly due to his timid nature, and also because certain master carpenters who were completing the best projects for citizens would only allow commissions for Andrea when they knew he was in dire straits, at which point he'd accept any price. Yet this doesn’t stop his works from being incredibly rare and highly valued, rightfully so, because he was one of the best and greatest masters to live even up to today. Our book contains many drawings by him, all good, but particularly there's one beautiful piece of the scene he painted at Poggio, depicting the tribute of all the animals from the East being presented to Cæsar. This drawing, done in chiaroscuro, is unique and the most refined Andrea ever created; when he drew natural subjects for use in his works, he made quick sketches on the spot, simply capturing the essence of what he saw. Later, when reproducing these in his works, he perfected them. So, his drawings served more as reminders of what he had seen rather than exact models for his paintings.
The disciples of Andrea were innumerable, but they did not all pursue the same course of study under his discipline, for some stayed with him a long time, and some but little; which was the fault, not of Andrea, but of his wife, who, tyrannizing arrogantly over them all, and showing no respect to a single one of them, made all their lives a burden. Among his disciples, then, were Jacopo da Pontormo; Andrea Sguazzella, who adhered to the manner of Andrea and decorated a palace, a work which is much extolled, without the city of Paris in France; Solosmeo; Pier Francesco di Jacopo di Sandro, who has painted three panels that [Pg 119] are in S. Spirito; Francesco Salviati; Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo, who was the companion of the aforesaid Salviati, although he did not stay long with Andrea; Jacopo del Conte of Florence; and Nannoccio, who is now in France with Cardinal de Tournon, in the highest credit. In like manner, Jacopo, called Jacone, was a disciple of Andrea and much his friend, and an imitator of his manner. This Jacone, while Andrea was alive, received no little help from him, as is evident in all his works, and particularly in the façade executed for the Chevalier Buondelmonti on the Piazza di S. Trinita.
The followers of Andrea were countless, but not all of them studied the same things under him. Some stayed with him for a long time, while others were there for a short period; this wasn’t Andrea’s fault, but rather his wife's, who ruled over everyone with arrogance and showed no respect to any of them, making their lives difficult. Among his disciples were Jacopo da Pontormo; Andrea Sguazzella, who stuck to Andrea's style and decorated a praised palace just outside Paris, France; Solosmeo; Pier Francesco di Jacopo di Sandro, who painted three panels that [Pg 119] are in S. Spirito; Francesco Salviati; Giorgio Vasari from Arezzo, who was a friend of Salviati but didn’t stay with Andrea for long; Jacopo del Conte from Florence; and Nannoccio, who is currently in France with Cardinal de Tournon, respected highly. Similarly, Jacopo, nicknamed Jacone, was a disciple and close friend of Andrea and an imitator of his style. While Andrea was alive, Jacone benefited greatly from him, which is clear in all his works, especially in the façade he created for Chevalier Buondelmonti in the Piazza di S. Trinita.
The heir to Andrea's drawings and other art-possessions, after his death, was Domenico Conti, who made little proficience in painting; but one night he was robbed—by some men of the same profession, so it is thought—of all the drawings, cartoons, and other things that he had from Andrea, nor was it ever discovered who these men were. Now Domenico, as one not ungrateful for the benefits received from his master, and desiring to render to him after his death the honours that he deserved, prevailed upon Raffaello da Montelupo to make for him out of courtesy a very handsome tablet of marble, which was built into a pilaster in the Church of the Servi, with the following epitaph, written for him by the most learned Messer Piero Vettori, then a young man:
The heir to Andrea's drawings and other art possessions, after his death, was Domenico Conti, who didn't have much talent in painting. One night, however, he was robbed—by some men from the same profession, or so people think—of all the drawings, sketches, and other items he received from Andrea, and it was never discovered who these men were. Now, Domenico, not wanting to be ungrateful for the benefits he received from his master and wanting to honor him after his death, convinced Raffaello da Montelupo to create a beautiful marble tablet for him as a courtesy. This tablet was built into a pilaster in the Church of the Servi, with the following epitaph, written for him by the most learned Messer Piero Vettori, who was a young man at the time:
ANDREÆ SARTIO
ADMIRABILIS INGENII PICTORI, AC VETERIBUS ILLIS OMNIUM JUDICIO
COMPARANDO,
DOMINICUS CONTES DISCIPULUS, PRO LABORIBUS IN SE INSTITUENDO SUSCEPTIS,
GRATO ANIMO POSUIT.
VIXIT ANN. XLII, OB. ANN. MDXXX.
ANDREÆ SARTIO
ADMIRABLE ARTIST OF REMARKABLE TALENT, COMPARED TO THOSE OLD MASTERS IN EVERYONE'S JUDGMENT,
DOMINICUS CONTES, HIS STUDENT, OUT OF GRATITUDE FOR THE EFFORTS HE PUT INTO HIS TRAINING,
SET THIS UP WITH THANKFUL HEART.
LIVED 42 YEARS, DIED IN 1530.
After no long time, certain citizens, Wardens of Works of that church, rather ignorant than hostile to honoured memories, so went to work out of anger that the tablet should have been set up in that place without their leave, that they had it removed; nor has it yet been re-erected in any other place. Thus, perchance, Fortune sought to show that the power of the Fates prevails not only during our lives, but also over our memorials after death. In spite of them, however, the works [Pg 120] and the name of Andrea are likely to live a long time, as are these my writings, I hope, to preserve their memory for many ages.
After a short time, some citizens, the Wardens of Works of that church, who were more ignorant than hostile to respected memories, got so upset that the tablet had been put up there without their permission that they had it taken down; and it hasn’t been put back up anywhere else yet. So, maybe Fortune wanted to show that the power of the Fates doesn’t just control our lives, but also our memorials after we’re gone. Still, the works [Pg 120] and the name of Andrea are likely to be remembered for a long time, just as I hope these writings of mine will keep their memory alive for many ages.
We must conclude, then, that if Andrea showed poor spirit in the actions of his life, contenting himself with little, this does not mean that in art he was otherwise than exalted in genius, most resolute, and masterly in every sort of labour; and with his works, in addition to the adornment that they confer on the places where they are, he rendered a most valuable service to his fellow-craftsmen with regard to manner, drawing, and colouring, and that with fewer errors than any other painter of Florence, for the reason that, as has been said above, he understood very well the management of light and shade and how to make things recede in the darks, and painted his pictures with a sweetness full of vivacity; not to mention that he showed us the method of working in fresco with perfect unity and without doing much retouching on the dry, which makes his every work appear to have been painted in a single day. Wherefore he should serve in every place as an example to Tuscan craftsmen, and receive supreme praise and a palm of honour among the number of their most celebrated champions.
We can conclude that even though Andrea may have had a lackluster spirit in his daily life, settling for less, this doesn't mean he wasn't exceptional in his artistry. His genius was remarkable, and he was determined and skillful in every type of work. His creations not only beautified the places they inhabited but also provided invaluable guidance to his fellow artists in terms of style, drawing, and color. He made fewer mistakes than any other painter in Florence because, as mentioned before, he had a strong grasp of light and shadow and knew how to make things recede into darkness. His paintings were filled with a lively sweetness. Additionally, he demonstrated how to work in fresco with perfect cohesion and minimal touch-ups, making it seem as if each piece was completed in a single day. Therefore, he should be a model for Tuscan artisans everywhere and deserves the highest praise and recognition among their most celebrated masters.
[Pg 121] MADONNA PROPERZIA DE' ROSSI
[Pg 123] LIFE OF MADONNA PROPERZIA DE' ROSSI
SCULPTOR[8] OF BOLOGNA
It is an extraordinary thing that in all those arts and all those exercises wherein at any time women have thought fit to play a part in real earnest, they have always become most excellent and famous in no common way, as one might easily demonstrate by an endless number of examples. Everyone, indeed, knows what they are all, without exception, worth in household matters; besides which, in connection with war, likewise, it is known who were Camilla, Harpalice, Valasca, Tomyris, Penthesilea, Molpadia, Orizia, Antiope, Hippolyta, Semiramis, Zenobia, and, finally, Mark Antony's Fulvia, who so often took up arms, as the historian Dion tells us, to defend her husband and herself. But in poetry, also, they have been truly marvellous, as Pausanias relates. Corinna was very celebrated as a writer of verse, and Eustathius makes mention in his "Catalogue of the Ships of Homer"—as does Eusebius in his book of "Chronicles"—of Sappho, a young woman of great renown, who, in truth, although she was a woman, was yet such that she surpassed by a great measure all the eminent writers of that age. And Varro, on his part, gives extraordinary but well-deserved praise to Erinna, who, with her three hundred verses, challenged the fame of the brightest light of Greece, and counterbalanced with her one small volume, called the "Elecate," the ponderous "Iliad" of the great Homer. Aristophanes celebrates Carissena, a votary of the same profession, as a woman of great excellence and learning; and the same may be said for Teano, Merone, Polla, Elpe, Cornificia, and Telesilla, to the last of whom, in [Pg 124] honour of her marvellous talents, a most beautiful statue was set up in the Temple of Venus.
It’s amazing that in all the arts and activities where women have decided to truly participate, they have consistently achieved remarkable success and fame in extraordinary ways, as can be easily shown by countless examples. Everyone knows their worth in household matters; in terms of war, we also recognize figures like Camilla, Harpalice, Valasca, Tomyris, Penthesilea, Molpadia, Orizia, Antiope, Hippolyta, Semiramis, Zenobia, and even Mark Antony's Fulvia, who, as the historian Dion tells us, often took up arms to defend her husband and herself. In poetry, they’ve also been truly impressive, as Pausanias notes. Corinna was well-known as a poet, and Eustathius mentions Sappho in his "Catalogue of the Ships of Homer"—as does Eusebius in his "Chronicles"—who, despite being a woman, far surpassed all the notable writers of that time. Varro also gives extraordinary but well-deserved praise to Erinna, whose three hundred lines rivaled the fame of the greatest works of Greece, counterbalancing with her small volume called the "Elecate" the hefty "Iliad" of the great Homer. Aristophanes celebrates Carissena, a fellow poet, as a woman of great skill and knowledge; the same can be said for Teano, Merone, Polla, Elpe, Cornificia, and Telesilla, to whom, in [Pg 124] honor of her incredible talents, a beautiful statue was erected in the Temple of Venus.
Passing by the numberless other writers of verse, do we not read that Arete was the teacher of the learned Aristippus in the difficulties of philosophy, and that Lastheneia and Assiotea were disciples of the divine Plato? In the art of oratory, Sempronia and Hortensia, women of Rome, were very famous. In grammar, so Athenæus relates, Agallis was without an equal. And as for the prediction of the future, whether we class this with astrology or with magic, it is enough to say that Themis, Cassandra, and Manto had an extraordinary renown in their times; as did Isis and Ceres in matters of agriculture, and the Thespiades in the whole field of the sciences.
Walking past countless other poets, we find that Arete taught the wise Aristippus about the challenges of philosophy, and that Lastheneia and Assiotea were students of the great Plato. In public speaking, Sempronia and Hortensia, women from Rome, were quite renowned. As Athenæus notes, Agallis was unmatched in grammar. And regarding predicting the future, whether we consider it astrology or magic, it's enough to mention that Themis, Cassandra, and Manto were exceptionally well-known in their times; so were Isis and Ceres in agriculture, and the Thespiades in the entire realm of science.
But in no other age, for certain, has it been possible to see this better than in our own, wherein women have won the highest fame not only in the study of letters—as has been done by Signora Vittoria del Vasto, Signora Veronica Gambara, Signora Caterina Anguisciuola, Schioppa, Nugarola, Madonna Laura Battiferri, and a hundred others, all most learned as well in the vulgar tongue as in the Latin and the Greek—but also in every other faculty. Nor have they been too proud to set themselves with their little hands, so tender and so white, as if to wrest from us the palm of supremacy, to manual labours, braving the roughness of marble and the unkindly chisels, in order to attain to their desire and thereby win fame; as did, in our own day, Properzia de' Rossi of Bologna, a young woman excellent not only in household matters, like the rest of them, but also in sciences without number, so that all the men, to say nothing of the women, were envious of her.
But in no other time has it been clearer than in our own, where women have achieved great recognition not only in literature—like Signora Vittoria del Vasto, Signora Veronica Gambara, Signora Caterina Anguisciuola, Schioppa, Nugarola, Madonna Laura Battiferri, and a hundred others, all of whom are highly educated in both the vernacular and in Latin and Greek—but also in every other field. They have also not been too proud to use their delicate and fair hands, as if to snatch away our supremacy, to engage in manual work, facing the challenges of marble and tough chisels, in order to fulfill their ambitions and earn recognition; like Properzia de' Rossi from Bologna, a young woman who excelled not only in domestic tasks, as many others did, but also in countless sciences, making all the men—let alone the women—envious of her.
This Properzia was very beautiful in person, and played and sang in her day better than any other woman of her city. And because she had an intellect both capricious and very ready, she set herself to carve peach-stones, which she executed so well and with such patience, that they were singular and marvellous to behold, not only for the subtlety of the work, but also for the grace of the little figures that she made in them and the delicacy with which they were distributed. And it was certainly a miracle to see on so small a thing as a peach-stone the whole [Pg 125] Passion of Christ, wrought in most beautiful carving, with a vast number of figures in addition to the Apostles and the ministers of the Crucifixion. This encouraged her, since there were decorations to be made for the three doors of the first façade of S. Petronio all in figures of marble, to ask the Wardens of Works, by means of her husband, for a part of that work; at which they were quite content, on the condition that she should let them see some work in marble executed by her own hand. Whereupon she straightway made for Count Alessandro de' Peppoli a portrait from life in the finest marble, representing his father, Count Guido, which gave infinite pleasure not only to them, but also to the whole city; and the Wardens of Works, therefore, did not fail to allot a part of the work to her. In this, to the vast delight of all Bologna, she made an exquisite scene, wherein—because at that time the poor woman was madly enamoured of a handsome young man, who seemed to care but little for her—she represented the wife of Pharaoh's Chamberlain, who, burning with love for Joseph, and almost in despair after so much persuasion, finally strips his garment from him with a womanly grace that defies description. This work was esteemed by all to be most beautiful, and it was a great satisfaction to herself, thinking that with this illustration from the Old Testament she had partly quenched the raging fire of her own passion. Nor would she ever do any more work in connection with that building, although there was no person who did not beseech her that she should go on with it, save only Maestro Amico, who out of envy always dissuaded her and went so far with his malignity, ever speaking ill of her to the Wardens, that she was paid a most beggarly price for her work.
This Properzia was very beautiful in person and played and sang better than any other woman in her city. Because she had a sharp and playful mind, she started carving peach stones, which she did so well and with such patience that they were unique and amazing to see. The craftsmanship was not only delicate but also featured graceful little figures that she created and arranged with finesse. It was truly astonishing to see the entire [Pg 125] Passion of Christ beautifully carved on such a small object as a peach stone, complete with a large number of figures including the Apostles and the ministers of the Crucifixion. This inspired her to ask the Wardens of Works, through her husband, for a commission for decorations on the three doors of the main façade of S. Petronio, which they happily accepted, provided she could show them some of her marble work. She immediately created a lifelike portrait in exquisite marble for Count Alessandro de' Peppoli, depicting his father, Count Guido, which delighted not only them but the entire city. Consequently, the Wardens of Works allocated part of the project to her. To the immense joy of all Bologna, she crafted a stunning scene inspired by the fact that, at that time, she was hopelessly in love with a handsome young man who seemed indifferent to her. She portrayed the wife of Pharaoh's Chamberlain, who, filled with longing for Joseph, and nearly driven to desperation, finally pulls his garment from him with an elegance that words can't describe. Everyone admired this work for its beauty, and it brought her great satisfaction, as she felt that through this depiction from the Old Testament, she had partially quelled the fire of her own desire. However, she never worked on that building again, despite everyone urging her to continue, except for Maestro Amico, who, out of envy, always discouraged her and went so far as to speak poorly of her to the Wardens, leading her to receive a meager payment for her work.
She also made two angels in very strong relief and beautiful proportions, which may now be seen, although against her wish, in the same building. In the end she devoted herself to copper-plate engraving, which she did without reproach, gaining the highest praise. And so the poor love-stricken young woman came to succeed most perfectly in everything, save in her unhappy passion.
She also created two angels with impressive detail and beautiful proportions, which can now be seen, although she didn't want them displayed, in the same building. Eventually, she focused on copper-plate engraving, which she did flawlessly, earning the highest acclaim. And so, the poor, love-stricken young woman managed to excel perfectly in everything, except for her unfortunate love.
The fame of an intellect so noble and so exalted spread throughout all Italy, and finally came to the ears of Pope Clement VII, who, [Pg 126] immediately after he had crowned the Emperor in Bologna, made inquiries after her; but he found that the poor woman had died that very week, and had been buried in the Della Morte Hospital, as she had directed in her last testament. At which the Pope, who was eager to see her, felt much sorrow at her death; but more bitter even was it for her fellow-citizens, who regarded her during her lifetime as one of the greatest miracles produced by nature in our days.
The reputation of such a noble and elevated intellect spread all across Italy and eventually reached Pope Clement VII, who, [Pg 126] right after he crowned the Emperor in Bologna, started asking about her. However, he discovered that the poor woman had died that very week and had been buried in the Della Morte Hospital, as she had requested in her last will. The Pope, who had been eager to meet her, was deeply saddened by her death; but it was even more painful for her fellow citizens, who considered her one of the greatest miracles produced by nature in our time.
In our book are some very good drawings by the hand of this Properzia, done with the pen and copied from the works of Raffaello da Urbino; and her portrait was given to me by certain painters who were very much her friends.
In our book, there are some really good drawings by Properzia, made with a pen and copied from the works of Raffaello da Urbino; and her portrait was given to me by some painters who were very close friends of hers.

TWO ANGELS,
after Madonna Properzia de' Rossi
(THE ASSUMPTION OF THE VIRGIN, after Tribolo)
(Bologna: S. Petronio)
Alinari
View larger image
TWO ANGELS,
after Madonna Properzia de' Rossi
(THE ASSUMPTION OF THE VIRGIN, after Tribolo)
(Bologna: S. Petronio)
Alinari
View larger image
But, although Properzia drew very well, there have not been wanting women not only to equal her in drawing, but also to do as good work in painting as she did in sculpture. Of these the first is Sister Plautilla, a nun and now Prioress in the Convent of S. Caterina da Siena, on the Piazza di S. Marco in Florence. She, beginning little by little to draw and to imitate in colours pictures and paintings by excellent masters, has executed some works with such diligence, that she has caused the craftsmen to marvel. By her hand are two panels in the Church of that Convent of S. Caterina, of which the one with the Magi adoring Jesus is much extolled. In the choir of the Convent of S. Lucia, at Pistoia, there is a large panel, containing Our Lady with the Child in her arms, S. Thomas, S. Augustine, S. Mary Magdalene, S. Catherine of Siena, S. Agnese, S. Catherine the Martyr, and S. Lucia; and another large panel by the same hand was sent abroad by the Director of the Hospital of Lelmo. In the refectory of the aforesaid Convent of S. Caterina there is a great Last Supper, with a panel in the work-room, both by the hand of the same nun. And in the houses of gentlemen throughout Florence there are so many pictures, that it would be tedious to attempt to speak of them all. A large picture of the Annunciation belongs to the wife of the Spaniard, Signor Mondragone, and Madonna Marietta de' Fedini has another like it. There is a little picture of Our Lady in S. Giovannino, at Florence; and an altar-predella in S. Maria del Fiore, containing very beautiful scenes from the life of S. Zanobi. And because [Pg 127] this venerable and talented sister, before executing panels and works of importance, gave attention to painting in miniature, there are in the possession of various people many wonderfully beautiful little pictures by her hand, of which there is no need to make mention. The best works from her hand are those that she has copied from others, wherein she shows that she would have done marvellous things if she had enjoyed, as men do, advantages for studying, devoting herself to drawing, and copying living and natural objects. And that this is true is seen clearly from a picture of the Nativity of Christ, copied from one which Bronzino once painted for Filippo Salviati. In like manner, the truth of such an opinion is proved by this, that in her works the faces and features of women, whom she has been able to see as much as she pleased, are no little better than the heads of the men, and much nearer to the reality. In the faces of women in some of her works she has portrayed Madonna Costanza de' Doni, who has been in our time an unexampled pattern of beauty and dignity; painting her so well, that it is impossible to expect more from a woman who, for the reasons mentioned above, has had no great practice in her art.
But even though Properzia was a great drawer, there have always been women who not only matched her in drawing but also produced just as good work in painting as she did in sculpture. The first among them is Sister Plautilla, a nun who is now the Prioress at the Convent of S. Caterina da Siena, located at Piazza di S. Marco in Florence. She started off slowly, learning to draw and imitate the works of excellent masters in color, and has created some pieces with such dedication that she has impressed the craftsmen. Her works include two panels in the Church of that Convent of S. Caterina, one of which, featuring the Magi adoring Jesus, has received much praise. In the choir of the Convent of S. Lucia in Pistoia, there's a large panel depicting Our Lady with the Child in her arms, along with S. Thomas, S. Augustine, S. Mary Magdalene, S. Catherine of Siena, S. Agnese, S. Catherine the Martyr, and S. Lucia; another large panel by the same artist was sent abroad by the Director of the Hospital of Lelmo. In the refectory of the aforementioned Convent of S. Caterina, there's a significant Last Supper and a panel in the workshop, both created by her. There are so many pictures by her in the homes of gentlemen throughout Florence that it would be tedious to list them all. A large picture of the Annunciation is owned by the wife of the Spaniard, Signor Mondragone, and Madonna Marietta de' Fedini has another similar one. There's a small picture of Our Lady in S. Giovannino in Florence, and an altar-predella in S. Maria del Fiore, featuring very beautiful scenes from the life of S. Zanobi. Because [Pg 127] this esteemed and talented sister, before creating important panels and works, focused on miniature painting, many wonderful little pictures by her hand are owned by various people, which don’t need to be specifically mentioned. The best works by her are those that she copied from others, demonstrating that she would have done marvelous things if she had had, like men, opportunities to study and devote herself to drawing and accurately depicting living and natural subjects. This is clearly shown in a painting of the Nativity of Christ, copied from one that Bronzino painted for Filippo Salviati. Similarly, the validity of this opinion is evident because the faces and features of women in her works, whom she was able to observe as much as she pleased, are significantly better than the heads of the men and much closer to reality. In the faces of women in some of her works, she portrayed Madonna Costanza de' Doni, who has been an unparalleled model of beauty and dignity in our time, painting her so well that it’s impossible to expect more from a woman who, for the reasons mentioned above, has not had extensive practice in her art.
With much credit to herself, likewise, has Madonna Lucrezia, the daughter of Messer Alfonso Quistelli della Mirandola, and now the wife of Count Clemente Pietra, occupied herself with drawing and painting, as she still does, after having been taught by Alessandro Allori, the pupil of Bronzino; as may be seen from many pictures and portraits executed by her hand, which are worthy to be praised by all. But Sofonisba of Cremona, the daughter of Messer Amilcaro Anguisciuola, has laboured at the difficulties of design with greater study and better grace than any other woman of our time, and she has not only succeeded in drawing, colouring, and copying from nature, and in making excellent copies of works by other hands, but has also executed by herself alone some very choice and beautiful works of painting. Wherefore she well deserved that King Philip of Spain, having heard of her merits and abilities from the Lord Duke of Alba, should have sent for her and caused her to be escorted in great honour to Spain, where he keeps her with a rich allowance about the person of the Queen, to the admiration of all [Pg 128] that Court, which reveres the excellence of Sofonisba as a miracle. And it is no long time since Messer Tommaso Cavalieri, a Roman gentleman, sent to the Lord Duke Cosimo (in addition to a drawing by the hand of the divine Michelagnolo, wherein is a Cleopatra) another drawing by the hand of Sofonisba, containing a little girl laughing at a boy who is weeping because one of the cray-fish out of a basket full of them, which she has placed in front of him, is biting his finger; and there is nothing more graceful to be seen than that drawing, or more true to nature. Wherefore, in memory of the talent of Sofonisba, who lives in Spain, so that Italy has no abundance of her works, I have placed it in my book of drawings.
With much credit to herself, Madonna Lucrezia, the daughter of Messer Alfonso Quistelli della Mirandola, and now the wife of Count Clemente Pietra, has dedicated herself to drawing and painting, as she still does, after being taught by Alessandro Allori, a student of Bronzino. This can be seen in many pictures and portraits created by her hand, which are worthy of praise from everyone. However, Sofonisba of Cremona, the daughter of Messer Amilcaro Anguisciuola, has put more effort into mastering design with greater skill and elegance than any other woman of our time. Not only has she excelled in drawing, coloring, and replicating from nature, and in creating excellent copies of others' works, but she has also produced some very fine and beautiful original paintings. Therefore, it is well-deserved that King Philip of Spain, having heard about her talents and abilities from the Lord Duke of Alba, summoned her and had her escorted with great honor to Spain, where he maintains her with a generous allowance near the Queen, to the admiration of everyone at that Court, which regards Sofonisba's excellence as miraculous. Not long ago, Messer Tommaso Cavalieri, a Roman gentleman, sent to Lord Duke Cosimo (along with a drawing by the divine Michelangelo, featuring Cleopatra) another drawing by Sofonisba, depicting a little girl laughing at a boy who is crying because one of the crayfish from a basket she placed in front of him is biting his finger; and there is nothing more graceful or true to nature than that drawing. Therefore, in memory of Sofonisba's talent, who lives in Spain, leaving Italy with few of her works, I have included it in my book of drawings.
We may truly say, then, with the divine Ariosto, that—
We can truly say, then, with the divine Ariosto, that—
Le donne son venute in eccellenza
Di ciascun' arte ov' hanno posto cura.
Le donne sono diventate eccellenti
In ogni arte a cui si sono dedicate.
And let this be the end of the Life of Properzia, sculptor of Bologna.
And let this be the end of the life of Properzia, sculptor from Bologna.
[Pg 129] ALFONSO LOMBARDI OF FERRARA, MICHELAGNOLO DA SIENA, GIROLAMO SANTA CROCE OF NAPLES, DOSSO AND BATTISTA DOSSI
[Pg 131] LIVES OF ALFONSO LOMBARDI OF FERRARA, MICHELAGNOLO DA SIENA, AND GIROLAMO SANTA CROCE OF NAPLES
SCULPTORS
AND DOSSO AND BATTISTA DOSSI
PAINTERS OF FERRARA
Alfonso of Ferrara, working in his early youth with stucco and wax, made an endless number of portraits from life on little medallions for many nobles and gentlemen of his own country. Some of these are still to be seen, white in colour and made of wax or stucco, and bear witness to the fine intellect and judgment that he possessed; such as those of Prince Doria, of Duke Alfonso of Ferrara, of Clement VII, of the Emperor Charles V, of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, of Bembo, of Ariosto, and of other suchlike personages. Finding himself in Bologna at the coronation of Charles V, he executed the decorations of the door of S. Petronio as a part of the preparations for that festival; and he had come into such repute through being the first to introduce the good method of making portraits from life in the form of medals, as has been related, that there was not a single man of distinction in those Courts for whom he did not execute some work, to his own great profit and honour. But, not being content with the gain and the glory that came to him from making works in clay, in wax, and in stucco, he set himself to work in marble; and such was the proficience that he showed in some things that he made, although these were of little importance, that he was commissioned to execute the tomb of Ramazzotto, which brought him very great fame and honour, in S. Michele in Bosco, without Bologna. After that work he made some little scenes of marble in [Pg 132] half-relief on the predella of the altar at the tomb of S. Dominic, in the same city. And for the door of S. Petronio, also, on the left hand of the entrance into the church, he executed some little scenes in marble, containing a very beautiful Resurrection of Christ. But what pleased the people of Bologna most of all was the Death of Our Lady, wrought with a very hard mixture of clay and stucco, with figures in full-relief, in an upper room of the Della Vita Hospital; and marvellous, among other things in that work, is the Jew who leaves his hands fixed to the bier of the Madonna. With the same mixture, also, he made a large Hercules with the dead Hydra under his feet, for the upper room of the Governor in the Palazzo Pubblico of that city; which statue was executed in competition with Zaccaria da Volterra, who was greatly surpassed by the ability and excellence of Alfonso. For the Madonna del Baracane the same master made two Angels in stucco, who are upholding a canopy in half-relief; and in some medallions in the middle aisle of S. Giuseppe, between one arch and another, he made the twelve Apostles from the waist upwards, of terra-cotta and in full-relief. In terra-cotta, likewise, for the corners of the vaulting of the Madonna del Popolo in the same city, he executed four figures larger than life; namely, S. Petronio, S. Procolo, S. Francis, and S. Dominic, figures which are all very beautiful and grand in manner. And by the hand of the same man are some works in stucco at Castel Bolognese, and some others in the Company of S. Giovanni at Cesena.
Alfonso of Ferrara, working in his early youth with stucco and wax, created countless life portraits on small medallions for many nobles and gentlemen from his homeland. Some of these can still be seen today, white in color and made of wax or stucco, showcasing the fine intellect and judgment he possessed; including those of Prince Doria, Duke Alfonso of Ferrara, Clement VII, Emperor Charles V, Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, Bembo, Ariosto, and other notable figures. While in Bologna for the coronation of Charles V, he decorated the door of S. Petronio as part of the festival preparations. He gained such a reputation for being the first to introduce the effective method of creating life portraits in the form of medals that there wasn't a single distinguished person at those Courts for whom he didn’t create a work, greatly benefiting and honoring himself. However, not content with the success and fame he obtained from creating works in clay, wax, and stucco, he decided to work in marble; and he displayed impressive skill in some of his projects, even though they were of minor importance, which led to his commission for the tomb of Ramazzotto, bringing him considerable fame and honor at S. Michele in Bosco, just outside Bologna. After that work, he created small marble scenes in [Pg 132] half-relief on the predella of the altar at the tomb of S. Dominic in the same city. For the door of S. Petronio, on the left side of the church entrance, he also created small marble scenes, including a very beautiful Resurrection of Christ. However, the work that most pleased the people of Bologna was the Death of Our Lady, crafted with a very hard mixture of clay and stucco, featuring full-relief figures, located in an upper room of the Della Vita Hospital; a remarkable detail in that piece is the Jew holding on to the bier of the Madonna. He also created a large statue of Hercules with the dead Hydra under his feet, for the upper room of the Governor in the Palazzo Pubblico of that city; this statue was completed in competition with Zaccaria da Volterra, who was significantly overshadowed by Alfonso's talent and skill. For the Madonna del Baracane, he made two stucco Angels holding up a canopy in half-relief; and in some medallions in the middle aisle of S. Giuseppe, between arches, he created the twelve Apostles from the waist up, made of terra-cotta and in full relief. In terra-cotta, he also executed four larger-than-life figures for the corners of the vaulting of Madonna del Popolo in the same city, namely S. Petronio, S. Procolo, S. Francis, and S. Dominic, all of which are very beautiful and grand in style. Additionally, he completed some stucco works at Castel Bolognese and others in the Company of S. Giovanni at Cesena.
Let no one marvel that hitherto our account of this master has dealt with scarcely any work save in clay, wax, and stucco, and very little in marble, because—besides the fact that Alfonso was always inclined to that sort of work—after passing a certain age, being very handsome in person and youthful in appearance, he practised art more for pleasure and to satisfy his own vanity than with any desire to set himself to chisel stone. He used always to wear on his arms, on his neck, and in his clothing, ornaments of gold and suchlike fripperies, which showed him to be rather a courtier, vain and wanton, than a craftsman desirous of glory. Of a truth, just as such ornaments enhance the splendour of those to whom, on account of their wealth, high estate, and noble blood, [Pg 133] they are becoming, so are they worthy of reproach in craftsmen and others, who should not measure themselves, some for one reason and some for another, with the rich, seeing that such persons, in place of being praised, are held in less esteem by men of judgment, and often laughed to scorn. Now Alfonso, charmed with himself and indulging in expressions and wanton excesses little worthy of a good craftsman, on one occasion robbed himself through this behaviour of all the glory that he had won by labouring at his profession. For one evening, chancing to be at a wedding in the house of a Count in Bologna, and having made love for some time to a lady of quality, he had the luck to be invited by her to dance the torch-dance; whereupon, whirling round with her, and overcome by the frenzy of his passion, he said with a trembling voice, sighing deeply, and gazing at his lady with eyes full of tenderness: "S'amor non è, che dunque è quel ch' io sento?"[9] Hearing this, the lady, who had a shrewd wit, answered, in order to show him his error: "A louse, perhaps." Which answer was heard by many, so that the saying ran through all Bologna, and he was held to scorn ever afterwards. Truly, if Alfonso had given his attention not to the vanities of the world, but to the labours of art, without a doubt he would have produced marvellous works; for if he achieved this in part without exerting himself much, what would he have done if he had faced the dust and heat?
Let no one be surprised that so far our account of this master has mostly focused on his work with clay, wax, and stucco, and very little on marble. Besides the fact that Alfonso was always drawn to that kind of work, after reaching a certain age, being very handsome and youthful, he practiced art more for fun and to satisfy his vanity than for the purpose of chiseling stone. He always adorned his arms, neck, and clothing with gold jewelry and other flashy items, which made him seem more like a vain courtier than a craftsman seeking glory. In truth, just as such ornaments enhance the appearance of those who are wealthy, in high positions, and of noble blood, they are also worthy of criticism in craftsmen and others, who shouldn't compare themselves to the rich, as such individuals, instead of being praised, are often looked down upon by discerning people and frequently ridiculed. Now, Alfonso, pleased with himself and indulging in expressions and excesses unworthy of a good craftsman, at one point robbed himself of all the glory he gained through hard work. One evening, while attending a wedding at a Count's house in Bologna, and having spent some time flirting with a noble lady, he got the chance to dance the torch dance with her. As he twirled around with her, overwhelmed by passion, he said in a trembling voice, deeply sighing and gazing at her with tender eyes: "If love isn't it, then what is it that I feel?" Hearing this, the lady, quick-witted, replied to point out his mistake: "A louse, perhaps." This response was heard by many, leading to the saying spreading throughout Bologna, and he was ridiculed ever since. Truly, if Alfonso had focused on the work instead of the distractions of the world, he undoubtedly would have created incredible pieces; for if he accomplished this much without much effort, imagine what he could have achieved if he had truly exerted himself.
The aforesaid Emperor Charles V being in Bologna, and the most excellent Tiziano da Cadore having come to make a portrait of his Majesty, Alfonso likewise was seized with a desire to execute a portrait of that Sovereign. And having no other means of contriving to do that, he besought Tiziano, without revealing to him what he had in mind, that he should do him the favour of introducing him, in the place of one of those who used to carry his colours, into the presence of his Majesty. Wherefore Tiziano, who loved him much, like the truly courteous man that he has always been, took Alfonso with him into the apartments of the Emperor. Alfonso, as soon as Tiziano had settled down to work, took up a position behind him, in such a way that he could not be seen [Pg 134] by the other, who was wholly intent on his portrait; and, taking up a little box in the shape of a medallion, he made therein a portrait of the Emperor in stucco, and had it finished at the very moment when Tiziano had likewise brought his picture to completion. The Emperor then rising, Alfonso closed the box and had already hidden it in his sleeve, to the end that Tiziano might not see it, when his Majesty said to him: "Show me what you have done." He was thus forced to give his portrait humbly into the hand of the Emperor, who, having examined it and praised it highly, said to him: "Would you have the courage to do it in marble?" "Yes, your sacred Majesty," answered Alfonso. "Do it, then," added the Emperor, "and bring it to me in Genoa." How unusual this proceeding must have seemed to Tiziano every man may imagine for himself. For my part, I believe that it must have appeared to him that he had compromised his credit. But what must have seemed to him most strange was this, that when his Majesty sent a present of a thousand crowns to Tiziano, he bade him give the half, or five hundred crowns, to Alfonso, keeping the other five hundred for himself, at which it is likely enough that Tiziano felt aggrieved. Alfonso, then, setting to work with the greatest zeal in his power, brought the marble head to completion with such diligence, that it was pronounced to be a very fine thing: which was the reason that, when he had taken it to the Emperor, his Majesty ordered that three hundred crowns more should be given to him.
The Emperor Charles V was in Bologna, and the talented Tiziano da Cadore came to make a portrait of him. Alfonso also wanted to create a portrait of the Emperor. With no other way to approach this, he asked Tiziano, without sharing his intentions, to introduce him as one of those who carried Tiziano’s colors to the Emperor. Tiziano, who cared for him and was always courteous, took Alfonso with him to the Emperor's quarters. As soon as Tiziano started working, Alfonso positioned himself behind him, out of sight from the Emperor, who was focused on the portrait. He took a small medallion-shaped box and sculpted a portrait of the Emperor in stucco, finishing it just as Tiziano completed his piece. When the Emperor stood up, Alfonso quickly closed the box and tucked it into his sleeve so Tiziano wouldn't see it. Just then, the Emperor said, "Show me what you’ve done." Alfonso was compelled to present his portrait to the Emperor, who examined it and praised it highly, saying, "Would you dare to do it in marble?" "Yes, your sacred Majesty," Alfonso replied. "Then do it," the Emperor insisted, "and bring it to me in Genoa." Tiziano must have found this very unusual; it likely made him think he had lost some respect. What may have surprised him most was when the Emperor sent Tiziano a gift of a thousand crowns and instructed him to give half, or five hundred crowns, to Alfonso, keeping the other five hundred for himself. This probably upset Tiziano. Alfonso then worked with great enthusiasm and completed the marble head with such care that it was deemed excellent. This led to the Emperor ordering that an additional three hundred crowns be given to him.

THE DEATH OF THE VIRGIN
(After the terra-cotta by Alfonso Lombardi.
Bologna: S. Maria della
Vita)
Poppi
View larger image
THE DEATH OF THE VIRGIN
(After the terra-cotta by Alfonso Lombardi.
Bologna: S. Maria della
Vita)
Poppi
View larger image
Alfonso having come into great repute through the gifts and praises bestowed on him by the Emperor, Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici took him to Rome, where he kept many sculptors and painters about his person, in addition to a vast number of other men of ability; and he commissioned him to make a copy in marble of a very famous antique head of the Emperor Vitellius. In that work Alfonso justified the opinion held of him by the Cardinal and by all Rome, and he was charged by the same patron to make a portrait-bust in marble of Pope Clement VII, after the life, and shortly afterwards one of Giuliano de' Medici, father of the Cardinal; but the latter was left not quite finished. These heads were afterwards sold in Rome, and bought by me at the request of the [Pg 135] Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, together with some pictures; and in our own day they have been placed by the Lord Duke Cosimo de' Medici in that hall of the new apartments of his palace wherein I have painted, on the ceiling and the walls, all the stories of Pope Leo X; they have been placed, I say, in that hall, over the doors made of that red veined marble which is found near Florence, in company with the heads of other illustrious men of the house of Medici.
Alfonso gained significant fame thanks to the gifts and praises he received from the Emperor. Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici brought him to Rome, where he surrounded himself with many sculptors, painters, and numerous other talented people. The Cardinal commissioned him to create a marble replica of a well-known ancient head of Emperor Vitellius. In this project, Alfonso proved the Cardinal's and all of Rome's good opinion of him. He was also tasked by the same patron to craft a life-sized marble portrait bust of Pope Clement VII, and soon after, one of Giuliano de' Medici, the Cardinal's father; however, the latter was left unfinished. These sculptures were later sold in Rome and bought by me at the request of the [Pg 135] Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici, along with some paintings. In our time, they have been placed by Lord Duke Cosimo de' Medici in the hall of the new apartments of his palace, where I have painted all the stories of Pope Leo X on the ceiling and walls. They are located in that hall, above the doors made of the red veined marble found near Florence, alongside the heads of other distinguished members of the Medici family.
But returning to Alfonso; he then went on to execute many works in sculpture for the same Cardinal, but these, being small things, have disappeared. After the death of Clement, when a tomb had to be made for him and also for Leo, the work was allotted by Cardinal de' Medici to Alfonso; whereupon he made a model with figures of wax, which was held to be very beautiful, after some sketches by Michelagnolo Buonarroti, and went off to Carrara with money to have the marble quarried. But not long afterwards the Cardinal, having departed from Rome on his way to Africa, died at Itri, and the work slipped out of the hands of Alfonso, because he was dismissed by its executors, Cardinals Salviati, Ridolfi, Pucci, Cibo, and Gaddi, and it was entrusted by the favour of Madonna Lucrezia Salviati, daughter of the great Lorenzo de' Medici, the elder, and sister of Leo, to Baccio Bandinelli, a sculptor of Florence, who had made models for it during the lifetime of Clement.
But getting back to Alfonso; he went on to create a number of sculptures for the same Cardinal, but unfortunately, these smaller works have disappeared. After Clement's death, when a tomb needed to be built for him and also for Leo, Cardinal de' Medici assigned the task to Alfonso. He created a beautiful model with wax figures that was based on some sketches by Michelangelo Buonarroti, and then he went to Carrara with money to get the marble quarried. However, shortly after that, the Cardinal left Rome for Africa and died in Itri, and the project was taken out of Alfonso's hands because he was dismissed by its executors, Cardinals Salviati, Ridolfi, Pucci, Cibo, and Gaddi. It was then entrusted, thanks to the favor of Madonna Lucrezia Salviati, daughter of the great Lorenzo de' Medici the elder and sister of Leo, to Baccio Bandinelli, a sculptor from Florence who had created models for it during Clement's lifetime.
For this reason Alfonso, thus knocked off his high horse and almost beside himself, determined to return to Bologna; and, having arrived in Florence, he presented to Duke Alessandro a most beautiful head in marble of the Emperor Charles V, which is now in Carrara, whither it was sent by Cardinal Cibo, who removed it after the death of Duke Alessandro from the guardaroba of that Prince. The Duke, when Alfonso arrived in Florence, was in the humour to have his portrait taken; for it had already been done on medals by Domenico di Polo, a gem-engraver, and by Francesco di Girolamo dal Prato, for the coinage by Benvenuto Cellini, and in painting by Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo and Jacopo da Pontormo, and he wished that Alfonso should likewise portray him. Wherefore he made a very beautiful portrait of him in relief, much better than the one executed by Danese da Carrara, and then, since he [Pg 136] was wholly set on going to Bologna, he was given the means to make one there in marble, after the model. And so, having received many gifts and favours from Duke Alessandro, Alfonso returned to Bologna, where, being still far from content on account of the death of the Cardinal, and sorely vexed by the loss of the tombs, there came upon him a pestilent and incurable disease of the skin, which wasted him away little by little, until, having reached the age of forty-nine, he passed to a better life, never ceasing to rail at Fortune, which had robbed him of a patron to whom he might have looked for all the blessings which could make him happy in this life, and saying that she should have closed his own eyes, since she had reduced him to such misery, rather than those of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici. Alfonso died in the year 1536.
For this reason, Alfonso, knocked off his high horse and nearly beside himself, decided to head back to Bologna. After arriving in Florence, he presented a stunning marble bust of Emperor Charles V to Duke Alessandro, which is now in Carrara; it was sent there by Cardinal Cibo, who took it away from Duke Alessandro's collection after his death. When Alfonso got to Florence, the Duke was in the mood to have his portrait done. It had already been created on medals by Domenico di Polo, a gem engraver, and by Francesco di Girolamo dal Prato for the coinage made by Benvenuto Cellini, and in painting by Giorgio Vasari from Arezzo and Jacopo da Pontormo. He wanted Alfonso to portray him, too. So, he made a beautiful relief portrait of the Duke, far better than the one done by Danese da Carrara. Since Alfonso was determined to go to Bologna, he was provided with the means to create a marble version based on the model. After receiving numerous gifts and favors from Duke Alessandro, Alfonso returned to Bologna, where he was still deeply unhappy due to the death of the Cardinal and troubled by the loss of the tombs. He then fell victim to a terrible and incurable skin disease, which gradually deteriorated his health until, at the age of forty-nine, he passed away. He never stopped cursing Fortune, which had denied him a patron who could have brought him all the happiness he sought, lamenting that she should have taken his life instead of that of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici. Alfonso died in the year 1536.

TOMB OF ADRIAN VI
(After Michelagnolo da Siena.
Rome: S. Maria dell' Anima)
Anderson
View larger image
TOMB OF ADRIAN VI
(After Michelagnolo da Siena.
Rome: S. Maria dell' Anima)
Anderson
View larger image
Michelagnolo, a sculptor of Siena, after he had spent the best years of his life in Sclavonia with other excellent sculptors, made his way to Rome on the following occasion. After the death of Pope Adrian, Cardinal Hincfort, who had been the friend and favourite of that Pontiff, determined, as one not ungrateful for the benefits received from him, to erect to him a tomb of marble; and he gave the charge of this to Baldassarre Peruzzi, the painter of Siena. And that master, having made the model, desired that the sculptor Michelagnolo, his friend and compatriot, should undertake the work on his own account. Michelagnolo, therefore, made on that tomb a lifesize figure of Pope Adrian, lying upon the sarcophagus and portrayed from nature, with a scene, also in marble, below him, showing his arrival in Rome and the Roman people going to meet him and to do him homage. Around the tomb, moreover, in four niches, are four Virtues in marble, Justice, Fortitude, Peace, and Prudence, all executed with much diligence by the hand of Michelagnolo after the counsel of Baldassarre. It is true, indeed, that some of the things that are in this work were wrought by the Florentine sculptor, Tribolo, then a very young man, and these were considered the best of all; but Michelagnolo executed the minor details of the work with supreme diligence and subtlety, and the little figures that are in it deserve to be extolled more than all the rest. Among other things, there are some variegated marbles wrought with a high finish, and put [Pg 137] together so well that nothing more could be desired. For these labours Michelagnolo received a just and honourable reward from the aforesaid Cardinal, and was treated with much favour by him for the rest of his life; and, in truth, with right good reason, seeing that this tomb and the Cardinal's gratitude have done as much to bring fame to him as did the work to give a name to Michelagnolo in his lifetime and renown after his death. This work finished, no long time elapsed before Michelagnolo passed from this life to the next, at about the age of fifty.
Michelangelo, a sculptor from Siena, after spending the best years of his life in Slavonia with other talented sculptors, made his way to Rome for an important reason. After Pope Adrian’s death, Cardinal Hincfort, who had been a friend and favorite of the Pope, decided to honor him by creating a marble tomb. He entrusted this work to Baldassarre Peruzzi, a painter from Siena. Baldassarre, having made the model, wanted his friend and fellow Sienese sculptor Michelangelo to take on the project himself. Consequently, Michelangelo created a life-size figure of Pope Adrian, lying on the sarcophagus, based on his likeness, along with a marble scene below depicting his arrival in Rome, where the Roman people came to greet and pay their respects to him. Additionally, around the tomb, there are four marble Virtues—Justice, Fortitude, Peace, and Prudence—all carefully crafted by Michelangelo under Baldassarre’s guidance. It is true that some elements of this work were done by the Florentine sculptor Tribolo, who was very young at the time, and those were considered the finest; however, Michelangelo meticulously executed the smaller details of the piece with exceptional care and skill, and the little figures within it deserve to be praised more than all the rest. Among other elements, there are richly colored marbles finished to a high standard, so perfectly combined that nothing more could be desired. For this work, Michelangelo received a fitting and honorably reward from Cardinal Hincfort and was treated with great favor by him for the rest of his life; and rightly so, as this tomb and the Cardinal's gratitude contributed significantly to his fame, as much as the work itself helped establish Michelangelo's name during his lifetime and his renown after his death. Once this work was completed, it wasn't long before Michelangelo passed away, around the age of fifty.
Girolamo Santa Croce of Naples, although he was snatched from us by death in the very prime of life, at a time when greater things were looked for from him, yet showed in the works of sculpture that he made at Naples during his few years, what he would have done if he had lived longer; for the works that he executed in sculpture at Naples were wrought and finished with all the lovingness that could be desired in a young man who wishes to surpass by a great measure those who for many years before his day have held the sovereignty in some noble profession. In S. Giovanni Carbonaro at Naples he built the Chapel of the Marchese di Vico, which is a round temple, partitioned by columns and niches, with some tombs carved with much diligence. And because the altar-piece of this chapel, made of marble in half-relief and representing the Magi bringing their offerings to Christ, is by the hand of a Spaniard, Girolamo executed in emulation of this work a S. John in a niche, so beautifully wrought in full-relief, that it showed that he was not inferior to the Spaniard either in courage or in judgment; on which account he won such a name, that, although Giovanni da Nola was held in Naples to be a marvellous sculptor and better than any other, nevertheless Girolamo worked in competition with him as long as he lived, notwithstanding that his rival was now old and had executed a vast number of works in that city, where it is much the custom to make chapels and altar-pieces of marble. Competing with Giovanni, then, Girolamo undertook to execute a chapel in Monte Oliveto at Naples, just within the door of the church, on the left hand, while Giovanni executed another opposite to his, on the other side, in the same style. In his chapel Girolamo made a lifesize Madonna in the round, which is [Pg 138] held to be a very beautiful figure; and since he took infinite pains in executing the draperies and the hands, and in giving bold relief to the marble by undercutting, he brought it to such perfection that it was the general opinion that he had surpassed all those who had handled tools for working marble at Naples in his time. This Madonna he placed between a S. John and a S. Peter, figures very well conceived and executed, and finished in a beautiful manner, as are also some children which are placed above them.
Girolamo Santa Croce of Naples, although he was taken from us by death at a young age, when greater things were expected of him, nonetheless demonstrated in his sculptures created in Naples during his short life what he could have accomplished if he had lived longer. The sculptures he produced in Naples were done with such care and skill that one could see the passion of a young man eager to exceed those who had dominated his field for years. In S. Giovanni Carbonaro in Naples, he built the Chapel of the Marchese di Vico, a round temple divided by columns and niches, featuring tombs carved with great detail. The altar-piece of this chapel, made of marble in half-relief and depicting the Magi presenting their gifts to Christ, was created by a Spaniard. To match this work, Girolamo crafted a S. John in a niche, so beautifully executed in full-relief that it proved he was equal to the Spaniard both in skill and aesthetic judgment. Because of this, he gained such recognition that, while Giovanni da Nola was considered an incredible sculptor in Naples, Girolamo continued to compete with him throughout his life, even though Giovanni was older and had produced a significant number of works in a city known for its marble chapels and altar-pieces. Competing against Giovanni, Girolamo took on the project of creating a chapel in Monte Oliveto at Naples, just inside the church door on the left, while Giovanni worked on another chapel directly opposite. In his chapel, Girolamo created a life-size Madonna, which is [Pg 138] regarded as a stunning figure. He took immense care in crafting the drapery and the hands, and through undercutting, he brought the marble to such a level of perfection that it was widely believed he surpassed all marble workers in Naples of his time. This Madonna was placed between figures of S. John and S. Peter, both exceptionally conceived and executed, along with some beautifully finished cherubs positioned above them.
In addition to these, he made two large and most beautiful statues in full-relief for the Church of Capella, a seat of the Monks of Monte Oliveto. He then began a statue of the Emperor Charles V, at the time of his return from Tunis; but after he had blocked it and carved it with the pointed chisel, and even in some places with the broad-toothed chisel, it remained unfinished, because fortune and death, envying the world such excellence, snatched him from us at the age of thirty-five. It was confidently expected that Girolamo, if he had lived, even as he had outstripped all his compatriots in his profession, would also have surpassed all the craftsmen of his time. Wherefore his death was a grievous blow to the Neapolitans, and all the more because he had been endowed by nature not only with a most beautiful genius, but also with as much modesty, sweetness, and gentleness as could be looked for in mortal man; so that it is no marvel if all those who knew him are not able to restrain their tears when they speak of him. His last sculptures were executed in 1537, in which year he was buried at Naples with most honourable obsequies.
In addition to these, he created two large and stunning statues in full relief for the Church of Capella, home to the Monks of Monte Oliveto. He then started a statue of Emperor Charles V, at the time of his return from Tunis; but after he had blocked it out and carved it with the pointed chisel, and even in some areas with the broad-toothed chisel, it remained unfinished. This was because fate and death, envious of such talent, took him from us at the age of thirty-five. It was expected that Girolamo, had he lived, would not only have surpassed all his fellow countrymen in his craft but would have also outdone all the artisans of his era. Therefore, his death was a significant loss to the people of Naples, especially since he was gifted not only with incredible talent but also with remarkable modesty, kindness, and gentleness. It’s no wonder that everyone who knew him struggles to hold back their tears when they talk about him. His last sculptures were completed in 1537, the year he was buried in Naples with the highest honors.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SS. PETER AND JOHN
(After the altar-piece by Girolamo Santa Croce.
Naples: Monte
Oliveto)
Alinari
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SS. PETER AND JOHN
(After the altar-piece by Girolamo Santa Croce.
Naples: Monte
Oliveto)
Alinari
View larger image
Old as he was, Giovanni da Nola, who was a well-practised sculptor, as may be seen from many works made by him at Naples with good skill of hand, but not with much design, still remained alive. Him Don Pedro di Toledo, Marquis of Villafranca, and at that time Viceroy of Naples, commissioned to execute a tomb of marble for himself and his wife; and therein Giovanni made a great number of scenes of the victories obtained by that lord over the Turks, with many statues for the same work, which stands quite by itself, and was executed with much diligence. This tomb was to have been taken to Spain; but, since [Pg 139] that nobleman did not do this while he was alive, it remained in Naples. Giovanni died at the age of seventy, and was buried in Naples, in the year 1558.
As old as he was, Giovanni da Nola, a highly skilled sculptor, as seen from many of his works in Naples, had good craftsmanship but lacked much in design. He was commissioned by Don Pedro di Toledo, Marquis of Villafranca, who was the Viceroy of Naples at the time, to create a marble tomb for himself and his wife. In this tomb, Giovanni depicted numerous scenes of the victories that the lord achieved over the Turks, along with several statues for the same project, which stands out for its quality and was created with great care. This tomb was meant to be taken to Spain; however, since [Pg 139] the nobleman did not do that while he was alive, it remained in Naples. Giovanni passed away at the age of seventy and was buried in Naples in 1558.
About the same time that Heaven presented to Ferrara, or rather, to the world, the divine Lodovico Ariosto, there was born in the same city the painter Dosso, who, although he was not as rare among painters as Ariosto among poets, nevertheless acquitted himself in his art in such a manner, that, besides the great esteem wherein his works were held in Ferrara, his merits caused the learned poet, his intimate friend, to honour his memory by mentioning him in his most celebrated writings; so that the pen of Messer Lodovico has given more renown to the name of Dosso than did all the brushes and colours that he used in the whole of his life. Wherefore I, for my part, declare that there could be no greater good-fortune than that of those who are celebrated by such great men, since the might of the pen forces most of mankind to accept their fame, even though they may not wholly deserve it.
About the same time that Heaven introduced Lodovico Ariosto to Ferrara, or rather, to the world, another notable figure was born in the same city: the painter Dosso. Although he may not have been as exceptional among painters as Ariosto was among poets, he excelled in his craft to the extent that, in addition to the high regard for his work in Ferrara, his talents led his close friend, the esteemed poet, to honor his memory by mentioning him in his most famous writings. In this way, Messer Lodovico's words have given Dosso more fame than all the brushes and colors he used in his entire career. Therefore, I assert that there is no greater fortune than being celebrated by such esteemed individuals, as the power of the pen compels most people to acknowledge their fame, even if they may not fully deserve it.
Dosso was much beloved by Duke Alfonso of Ferrara: first for his good abilities in the art of painting, and then because he was a very pleasant and amiable person—a manner of man in whom the Duke greatly delighted. Dosso had the reputation in Lombardy of executing landscapes better than any other painter engaged in that branch of the profession, whether in mural painting, in oils, or in gouache; and all the more after the German manner became known. In Ferrara, for the Cathedral Church, he executed a panel-picture with figures in oils, which was held to be passing beautiful; and in the Duke's Palace he painted many rooms, in company with a brother of his, called Battista. These two were always enemies, one against the other, although they worked together by the wish of the Duke. In the court of the said palace they executed stories of Hercules in chiaroscuro, with an endless number of nudes on those walls; and in like manner they painted many works on panel and in fresco throughout all Ferrara. By their hands is a panel in the Duomo of Modena; and they painted many things in the Cardinal's Palace at Trento, in company with other painters.
Dosso was cherished by Duke Alfonso of Ferrara, first for his skill in painting and then because he was a delightful and friendly person—someone the Duke truly enjoyed being around. Dosso was known in Lombardy for creating landscapes better than any other painter in that field, whether in mural work, oils, or gouache; this reputation only grew after the German style became popular. In Ferrara, for the Cathedral Church, he created a stunning panel painting with figures in oils, which was considered extremely beautiful. In the Duke's Palace, he painted many rooms alongside his brother, Battista. Despite working together at the Duke's request, these two were always rivals. In the courtyard of the palace, they depicted stories of Hercules in chiaroscuro, filled with countless nudes on the walls; they also completed many panel and fresco works all over Ferrara. A panel by them is located in the Duomo of Modena, and they created numerous pieces in the Cardinal's Palace at Trento, collaborating with other painters.
[Pg 140] At this same time the painter and architect, Girolamo Genga, was executing various decorations in the Imperiale Palace, above Pesaro, as will be related in the proper place, for Duke Francesco Maria of Urbino; and among the number of painters who were summoned to that work by order of the same Signor Francesco Maria, invitations were sent to Dosso and Battista of Ferrara, principally for the painting of landscapes; many paintings having been executed long before in that palace by Francesco di Mirozzo[10] of Forlì, Raffaello dal Colle of Borgo a San Sepolcro, and many others. Now, having arrived at the Imperiale, Dosso and Battista, according to the custom of men of their kidney, found fault with most of the paintings that they saw, and promised the Duke that they would do much better work; and Genga, who was a shrewd person, seeing how the matter was likely to end, gave them an apartment to paint by themselves. Thereupon, setting to work, they strove with all labour and diligence to display their worth; but, whatever may have been the reason, never in all the course of their lives did they do any work less worthy of praise, or rather, worse, than that one. It seems often to happen, indeed, that in their greatest emergencies, when most is expected of them, men become blinded and bewildered in judgment, and do worse work than at any other time; which may result, perchance, from their own malign and evil disposition to be always finding fault with the works of others, or from their seeking to force their genius overmuch, seeing that to proceed step by step according to the ruling of nature, yet without neglecting diligence and study, appears to be a better method than seeking to wrest from the brain, as it were by force, things that are not there; and it is a fact that in the other arts as well, but above all in that of writing, lack of spontaneity is only too easily recognized, and also, so to speak, over-elaboration in everything.
[Pg 140] During this same time, the painter and architect Girolamo Genga was working on various decorations in the Imperiale Palace above Pesaro, as will be discussed later, for Duke Francesco Maria of Urbino. Among the painters called to assist with this project by Duke Francesco Maria were Dosso and Battista from Ferrara, mainly for landscape paintings. Many artworks had already been created in that palace earlier by Francesco di Mirozzo[10] from Forlì, Raffaello dal Colle from Borgo a San Sepolcro, and several others. Once they arrived at the Imperiale, Dosso and Battista, true to their nature, criticized most of the existing artworks and assured the Duke that they would produce much better results. Genga, being a perceptive individual, recognizing how things might turn out, provided them with a separate room to work in. They then dedicated themselves fully to prove their talent; however, for reasons unknown, they never created anything less deserving of praise or, rather, worse, than that work. It often seems that in critical situations, when the most is expected from someone, they can become confused and lose their judgment, resulting in poorer work than at any other time. This might stem from their negative tendencies to constantly critique others' work or from forcing their creativity too much. It appears that proceeding gradually according to nature’s guidance, while still being diligent and studious, is a better approach than trying to forcibly extract ideas that aren’t present. Additionally, in other fields, especially writing, a lack of spontaneity is easily noticeable, along with a tendency to overcomplicate things.

DOSSO DOSSI: A NYMPH WITH A SATYR
(Florence: Pitti, 147. Canvas)
View larger image
DOSSO DOSSI: A NYMPH WITH A SATYR
(Florence: Pitti, 147. Canvas)
View larger image
Now, when the work of the Dossi was unveiled, it proved to be so ridiculous that they left the service of the Duke in disgrace; and he was forced to throw to the ground all that they had executed, and to have it repainted by others after the designs of Genga.
Now, when the work of the Dossi was revealed, it turned out to be so laughable that they left the Duke's service in shame; he was compelled to discard everything they had created and have it repainted by others based on Genga's designs.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SS. GEORGE AND MICHAEL
(After the painting by Dosso Dossi.
Modena: Pinacoteca, 437)
Anderson
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SS. GEORGE AND MICHAEL
(After the painting by Dosso Dossi.
Modena: Pinacoteca, 437)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 141] Finally, they painted a very beautiful panel-picture in the Duomo of Faenza for the Chevalier, M. Giovan Battista de' Buosi, of Christ disputing in the Temple; in which work they surpassed themselves, by reason of the new manner that they used, and particularly in the portraits of that Chevalier and of others. That picture was set up in that place in the year 1536. Ultimately Dosso, having grown old, spent his last years without working, being pensioned until the close of his life by Duke Alfonso. And in the end Battista survived him, executing many works by himself, and maintaining himself in a good condition. Dosso was buried in his native city of Ferrara.
[Pg 141] Finally, they created a stunning panel painting in the Duomo of Faenza for the knight, M. Giovan Battista de' Buosi, depicting Christ debating in the Temple. In this piece, they exceeded their previous efforts, thanks to the new style they adopted, especially in the portraits of that knight and others. That painting was installed in that location in 1536. Eventually, Dosso, having aged, spent his final years without working, being supported by a pension from Duke Alfonso until the end of his life. In the end, Battista outlived him, producing many works on his own and maintaining a good standard of living. Dosso was buried in his hometown of Ferrara.
There lived in the same times the Milanese Bernazzano, a very excellent painter of landscapes, herbage, animals, and other things of earth, air, and water. And since, as one who knew himself to have little aptitude for figures, he did not give much attention to them, he associated himself with Cesare da Sesto, who painted them very well and in a beautiful manner. It is said that Bernazzano executed in a courtyard some very beautiful landscapes in fresco, in which he painted a strawberry-bed full of strawberries, ripe, green, and in blossom, and so well imitated, that some peacocks, deceived by their natural appearance, were so persistent in picking at them as to make holes in the plaster.
There lived around the same time a talented painter from Milan named Bernazzano, known for his excellent landscapes, plants, animals, and other elements of earth, air, and water. Aware that he wasn’t very skilled at painting figures, he focused less on them and teamed up with Cesare da Sesto, who painted them beautifully. It’s said that Bernazzano created some stunning fresco landscapes in a courtyard, where he depicted a strawberry patch filled with ripe, green, and blossoming strawberries so realistically that some peacocks, tricked by their lifelike appearance, kept pecking at them until they made holes in the plaster.
[Pg 143] GIOVANNI ANTONIO LICINIO OF PORDENONE, AND OTHER PAINTERS OF FRIULI
[Pg 145] LIVES OF GIOVANNI ANTONIO LICINIO OF PORDENONE, AND OF OTHER PAINTERS OF FRIULI
It would seem, as has been remarked already in the same connection, that Nature, the kindly mother of the universe, sometimes presents the rarest things to certain places that never had any knowledge of such gifts, and that at times she creates in some country men so much inclined to design and to painting, that, without masters, but only by imitating living and natural objects, they become most excellent. And it also happens very often that when one man has begun, many set themselves to work in competition with him, and labour to such purpose, without seeing Rome, Florence, or any other place full of notable pictures, but merely through rivalry one with another, that marvellous works are seen to issue from their hands. All this may be seen to have happened more particularly in Friuli, where, in our own day, in consequence of such a beginning, there has been a vast number of excellent painters—a thing which had not occurred in those parts for many centuries.
It seems, as has already been noted, that Nature, the nurturing mother of the universe, sometimes offers rare gifts to places that have never known such treasures. At times, she creates individuals in certain regions who are naturally inclined toward design and painting, so much so that, without teachers and simply by imitating living and natural objects, they achieve remarkable excellence. It often happens that when one person begins to create, many others start working in competition with them, striving with great purpose—even without having seen Rome, Florence, or any other places filled with notable artworks—merely out of rivalry with one another, leading to the emergence of stunning works from their hands. This phenomenon can be particularly observed in Friuli, where, in our own time, as a result of such beginnings, there has been an abundance of excellent painters—a situation that has not occurred in that region for many centuries.
While Giovanni Bellini was working in Venice and teaching his art to many, as has been related, he had two disciples who were rivals one with another—Pellegrino da Udine, who, as will be told, was afterwards called Da San Daniele, and Giovanni Martini of Udine. Let us begin, then, by speaking of Giovanni. He always imitated the manner of Bellini, which was somewhat crude, hard, and dry; nor was he ever able to give it sweetness or softness, although he was a diligent and finished painter. This may have happened because he was always making trial of certain reflections, half-lights, and shadows, with which, cutting the relief in the middle, he contrived to define light and shade very abruptly, in such a way that the colouring of all his works was [Pg 146] always crude and unpleasant, although he strove laboriously with his art to imitate Nature. By the hand of this master are numerous works in many places in Friuli, particularly in the city of Udine, in the Duomo of which there is a panel-picture executed in oils, of S. Mark seated with many figures round him, which is held to be the best of all that he ever painted. There is another on the altar of S. Ursula in the Church of the Friars of S. Pietro Martire, wherein the first-mentioned Saint is standing with some of her virgins round her, all painted with much grace and beautiful expressions of countenance. This Giovanni, besides being a passing good painter, was endowed by Nature with beauty and grace of features and an excellent character, and, what is most desirable, with such foresight and power of management, that, after his death, in default of heirs male, he left an inheritance of much property to his wife. And she, being, so I have heard, a lady as shrewd as she was beautiful, knew so well how to manage her life after the death of her husband, that she married two very beautiful daughters into the richest and most noble houses of Udine.
While Giovanni Bellini was working in Venice and teaching his art to many, as mentioned earlier, he had two rival students—Pellegrino da Udine, who was later called Da San Daniele, and Giovanni Martini of Udine. Let's start by talking about Giovanni. He always tried to imitate Bellini's style, which was somewhat rough, harsh, and dry; he could never quite add sweetness or softness to it, even though he was a skilled and dedicated painter. This might have been because he was constantly experimenting with reflections, highlights, and shadows, which caused him to define light and dark very abruptly, making the colors in all his works [Pg 146] always look crude and unappealing, even though he worked hard to imitate Nature. This master created many works in various places in Friuli, especially in the city of Udine, where in the Duomo, there is an oil panel painting of St. Mark seated with many figures around him, which is regarded as his best work. There is another on the altar of St. Ursula in the Church of the Friars of St. Pietro Martire, where the first-mentioned Saint stands with some of her virgins around her, all painted with great grace and beautiful facial expressions. Giovanni, besides being a decent painter, was naturally gifted with beauty and grace, and had a good character. Most importantly, he had the foresight and management skills so that after his death, with no male heirs, he left a substantial inheritance to his wife. She, as I’ve heard, was just as clever as she was beautiful, and managed her life so well after her husband’s death that she married off her two lovely daughters into the wealthiest and most noble families of Udine.
Pellegrino da San Daniele, who was a rival of Giovanni, as has been related, and a man of greater excellence in painting, received at baptism the name of Martino. But Giovanni Bellini, judging that he was destined to become, as he afterwards did, a truly rare master of art, changed his name from Martino to Pellegrino.[11] And even as his name was changed, so he may be said by chance to have changed his country, since, living by preference at San Daniele, a township ten miles distant from Udine, and spending most of his time in that place, where he had taken a wife, he was called ever afterwards not Martino da Udine, but Pellegrino da San Daniele. He painted many pictures in Udine, and some may still be seen on the doors of the old organ, on the outer side of which is painted a sunken arch in perspective, containing a S. Peter seated among a multitude of figures and handing a pastoral staff to S. Ermacora the Bishop. On the inner side of the same doors, likewise, in some niches, he painted the four Doctors of the Church in the act of studying. For the Chapel of S. Giuseppe he executed a panel-picture [Pg 147] in oils, drawn and coloured with much diligence, in the middle of which is S. Joseph standing in a beautiful attitude, with an air of dignity, and beside him is Our Lord as a little Child, while S. John the Baptist is below in the garb of a little shepherd-boy, gazing intently on his Master. And since this picture is much extolled, we may believe what is said of it—namely, that he painted it in competition with the aforesaid Giovanni, and that he put forward every effort to make it, as it proved to be, more beautiful than that which Giovanni painted of S. Mark, as has been related above. Pellegrino also painted at Udine, for the house of Messer Pre Giovanni, intendant to the illustrious Signori della Torre, a picture of Judith from the waist upwards, with the head of Holofernes in one hand, which is a very beautiful work. By the hand of the same man is a large panel in oils, divided into several pictures, which may be seen on the high-altar of the Church of S. Maria in the town of Civitale, at a distance of eight miles from Udine; and in it are some heads of virgins and other figures with great beauty of expression. And in his township of San Daniele, in a chapel of S. Antonio, he painted in fresco scenes of the Passion of Jesus Christ, and that so finely that he well deserved to be paid more than a thousand crowns for the work. He was much beloved for his talents by the Dukes of Ferrara, and, in addition to other favours and many gifts, he obtained through their good offices two Canonicates in the Duomo of Udine for two of his relatives.
Pellegrino da San Daniele, who was a rival of Giovanni as mentioned, and a more skilled painter, was given the name Martino at his baptism. However, Giovanni Bellini, believing he was destined to become a truly exceptional master of art—as he indeed did—changed his name from Martino to Pellegrino.[11] And just as his name was changed, he can be said to have changed his home by chance, since he preferred to live in San Daniele, a town ten miles from Udine, and spent most of his time there after marrying. Because of this, he was forever known not as Martino da Udine, but as Pellegrino da San Daniele. He painted several works in Udine, and some of them can still be seen on the doors of the old organ. On the outside, there's a painted sunken arch in perspective, depicting St. Peter seated among a crowd of figures, handing a pastoral staff to St. Ermacora the Bishop. On the inside of the same doors, in several niches, he painted the four Doctors of the Church engaged in study. For the Chapel of St. Joseph, he created an oil panel painting that he drew and colored with great care, featuring St. Joseph standing gracefully with dignity, alongside Our Lord as a young child, while St. John the Baptist, dressed like a little shepherd boy, gazes intently at his Master. This painting is highly praised, and it's said that he created it as a challenge to Giovanni, striving to make it even more beautiful than Giovanni's painting of St. Mark, as previously mentioned. Pellegrino also painted in Udine for Messer Pre Giovanni, steward to the illustrious Signori della Torre, a stunning depiction of Judith from the waist up, holding Holofernes’ head in one hand. He also created a large oil panel divided into several images, which can be seen on the high altar of the Church of St. Maria in Civitale, about eight miles from Udine; it features beautiful expressions in the heads of virgins and other figures. In his home of San Daniele, he painted frescoes of the Passion of Jesus Christ in a chapel of St. Anthony, executing the work so finely that he certainly deserved more than a thousand crowns for it. He was much loved for his talent by the Dukes of Ferrara, and besides other favors and generous gifts, they helped him obtain two Canonicates in the Duomo of Udine for two of his relatives.
Among his pupils, of whom he had many, making much use of them and rewarding them liberally, was one of Greek nationality, a man of no little ability, who had a very beautiful manner and imitated Pellegrino closely. But Luca Monverde of Udine, who was much beloved by Pellegrino, would have been superior to the Greek, if he had not been snatched from the world prematurely when still a mere lad; although one work by his hand was left on the high-altar of S. Maria delle Grazie in Udine, a panel-picture in oils, his first and last, in which, in a recess in perspective, there is a Madonna seated on high with the Child in her arms, painted by him with a soft gradation of shadow, while on the level surface below there are two figures on either side, so beautiful that [Pg 148] they show that if he had lived longer he would have become truly excellent.
Among his many students, whom he made good use of and rewarded generously, was a Greek man with considerable talent, who had a very graceful style and closely imitated Pellegrino. However, Luca Monverde from Udine, who was greatly admired by Pellegrino, would have outshone the Greek if he hadn’t been taken from the world too soon while still a young boy. Although he only left behind one work, it can be found on the high altar of S. Maria delle Grazie in Udine. It's an oil panel painting, his first and last, depicting a Madonna sitting high with the Child in her arms, rendered with a gentle gradient of shadow. Below, on the flat surface, there are two figures on either side, so beautiful that [Pg 148] they illustrate that if he had lived longer, he would have truly excelled.
Another disciple of the same Pellegrino was Bastianello Florigorio, who painted a panel-picture that is over the high-altar of S. Giorgio in Udine, of a Madonna in the sky surrounded by an endless number of little angels in various attitudes, all adoring the Child that she holds in her arms; while below there is a very well executed landscape. There is also a very beautiful S. John, and a S. George in armour and on horseback, who, foreshortened in a spirited attitude, is slaying the Dragon with his lance; while the Maiden, who is there on one side, appears to be thanking God and the glorious Virgin for the succour sent to her. In the head of the S. George Bastianello is said to have made his own portrait. He also painted two pictures in fresco in the Refectory of the Friars of S. Pietro Martire: in one is Christ seated at table with the two disciples at Emmaus, and breaking the bread with a benediction, and in the other is the death of S. Peter Martyr. The same master painted in fresco in a niche on a corner of the Palace of M. Marguando, an excellent physician, a nude man in foreshortening, representing a S. John, which is held to be a good painting. Finally, he was forced through some dispute to depart from Udine, for the sake of peace, and to live like an exile in Civitale.
Another disciple of the same Pellegrino was Bastianello Florigorio, who created a panel painting that sits over the high altar of S. Giorgio in Udine, depicting a Madonna in the sky surrounded by countless little angels in various poses, all worshiping the Child she holds in her arms. Below, there's a beautifully executed landscape. There's also a stunning S. John and a S. George in armor on horseback, captured in a dynamic pose, slaying the Dragon with his lance; meanwhile, the Maiden on one side appears to be thanking God and the glorious Virgin for the help they sent her. It’s said that Bastianello used his own likeness for the face of S. George. He also painted two frescoes in the Refectory of the Friars of S. Pietro Martire: one shows Christ seated at a table with the two disciples at Emmaus, breaking bread with a blessing, and the other depicts the death of S. Peter Martyr. The same artist painted a fresco in a niche on a corner of the Palace of M. Marguando, an excellent physician, of a nude man in foreshortening, representing S. John, which is regarded as a fine piece of art. In the end, he had to leave Udine due to some dispute for the sake of peace and ended up living as an exile in Civitale.
Bastianello had a crude and hard manner, because he much delighted in drawing works in relief and objects of Nature by candle-light. He had much beauty of invention, and he took great pleasure in executing portraits from life, making them truly beautiful and very like; and at Udine, among others, he made one of Messer Raffaello Belgrado, and one of the father of M. Giovan Battista Grassi, an excellent painter and architect, from whose loving courtesy we have received much particular information touching our present subject of Friuli. Bastianello lived about forty years.
Bastianello had a rough and intense style because he really enjoyed creating relief works and nature scenes by candlelight. He had a lot of creative talent and took great pleasure in painting lifelike portraits, making them both beautiful and very accurate. In Udine, he painted one of Messer Raffaello Belgrado and another of the father of M. Giovan Battista Grassi, an excellent painter and architect, from whom we’ve received plenty of valuable information regarding our current subject of Friuli. Bastianello lived for about forty years.
Another disciple of Pellegrino was Francesco Floriani of Udine, who is still alive and is a very good painter and architect, like his younger brother, Antonio Floriani, who, thanks to his rare abilities in his profession, is now in the service of his glorious Majesty the Emperor [Pg 149] Maximilian. Some of the pictures of that same Francesco were to be seen two years ago in the possession of the Emperor, who was then a King; one of these being a Judith who has cut off the head of Holofernes, painted with admirable judgment and diligence. And in the collection of that monarch there is a book of pen-drawings by the same master, full of lovely inventions, buildings, theatres, arches, porticoes, bridges, palaces, and many other works of architecture, all useful and very beautiful.
Another disciple of Pellegrino was Francesco Floriani from Udine, who is still alive and is a very talented painter and architect, just like his younger brother, Antonio Floriani. Thanks to his exceptional skills in his profession, he is now serving His Glorious Majesty Emperor Maximilian. Two years ago, some of Francesco's paintings were in the possession of the Emperor, who was then a King; one of these was a depiction of Judith beheading Holofernes, painted with remarkable skill and care. In that monarch's collection, there is also a book of sketches by the same master, filled with beautiful designs, buildings, theaters, arches, porticoes, bridges, palaces, and many other architectural works, all useful and very attractive.
Gensio Liberale was also a disciple of Pellegrino, and in his pictures, among other things, he imitated every sort of fish excellently well. This master is now in the service of the Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, a splendid position, which he deserves, for he is a very good painter.
Gensio Liberale was also a student of Pellegrino, and in his paintings, he expertly imitated all kinds of fish. This master is currently working for Archduke Ferdinand of Austria, a prestigious position that he deserves because he is an excellent painter.
But among the most illustrious and renowned painters of the territory of Friuli, the rarest and most famous in our day—since he has surpassed those mentioned above by a great measure in the invention of scenes, in draughtsmanship, in boldness, in mastery over colour, in fresco work, in swiftness of execution, in strength of relief, and in every other department of our arts—is Giovanni Antonio Licinio, called by some Cuticello. This master was born at Pordenone, a township in Friuli, twenty-five miles from Udine; and since he was endowed by nature with a beautiful genius and an inclination for painting, he devoted himself without any teacher to the study of natural objects, imitating the style of Giorgione da Castelfranco, because that manner, seen by him many times in Venice, had pleased him much. Now, having learnt the rudiments of art, he was forced, in order to save his life from a pestilence that had fallen upon his native place, to take to flight; and thus, passing many months in the surrounding country, he executed various works in fresco for a number of peasants, gaining at their expense experience of using colour on plaster. Wherefore, since the surest and best method of learning is practice and a sufficiency of work, it came to pass that he became a well-practised and judicious master of that kind of painting, and learned to make colours produce the desired effect when used in a fluid state, which is done on account of the white, which dries the plaster and produces a brightness that ruins all softness. [Pg 150] And so, having mastered the nature of colours, and having learnt by long practice to work very well in fresco, he returned to Udine, where he painted for the altar of the Nunziata, in the Convent of S. Pietro Martire, a panel-picture in oils containing the Madonna at the moment of receiving the Salutation from the Angel Gabriel; and in the sky he made a God the Father surrounded by many little boys, who is sending down the Holy Spirit. This work, which is executed with good drawing, grace, vivacity, and relief, is held by all craftsmen of judgment to be the best that he ever painted.
But among the most celebrated and well-known painters from the Friuli region, the rarest and most famous today—having far surpassed those previously mentioned in creativity, drawing skills, boldness, mastery of color, fresco technique, speed of execution, and every other aspect of our arts—is Giovanni Antonio Licinio, also known as Cuticello. He was born in Pordenone, a town in Friuli, twenty-five miles from Udine. Blessed with a natural talent and a passion for painting, he taught himself by studying nature and imitating the style of Giorgione da Castelfranco, which he admired after seeing it many times in Venice. After learning the basics of art, he had to flee to save his life from a plague in his hometown; thus, spending several months in the surrounding countryside, he created various fresco works for local peasants, gaining experience in using color on plaster. This practical experience allowed him to become a skilled and discerning master in that type of painting, and he learned how to make colors achieve the desired effect when applied in a wet state, as the white dries the plaster and creates a brightness that destroys any softness. [Pg 150] Having mastered color techniques and developed his fresco skills through extensive practice, he returned to Udine, where he painted an oil panel for the altar of the Nunziata in the Convent of S. Pietro Martire, depicting the Madonna at the moment of receiving the Salutation from the Angel Gabriel. In the sky, he portrayed God the Father surrounded by cherubs, sending down the Holy Spirit. This piece, recognized for its excellent drawing, grace, vibrancy, and relief, is regarded by knowledgeable craftsmen as the best work he ever created.
In the Duomo of the same city, on the balustrade of the organ, below the doors already painted by Pellegrino, he painted a story of S. Ermacora and Fortunatus, also in oils, graceful and well designed. In the same city, in order to gain the friendship of the Signori Tinghi, he painted in fresco the façade of their palace; in which work, wishing to make himself known and to prove what a master he was of architectural invention and of working in fresco, he made a series of compartments and groups of varied ornaments full of figures in niches; and in three great spaces in the centre of the work he painted scenes with figures in colours, two spaces, high and narrow, being on either side, and one square in shape in the middle; and in the latter he painted a Corinthian column planted with its base in the sea, with a Siren on the right hand, holding the column upright, and a nude Neptune on the left supporting it on the other side; while above the capital of the column there is a Cardinal's hat, the device, so it is said, of Pompeo Colonna, who was much the friend of the owners of that palace. In one of the two other spaces are the Giants being slain with thunderbolts by Jove, with some dead bodies on the ground very well painted and most beautifully foreshortened. On the other side is a Heaven full of Gods, and on the earth two Giants who, club in hand, are in the act of striking at Diana, who, defending herself in a bold and spirited attitude, is brandishing a blazing torch as if to burn the arms of one of them.
In the Duomo of that city, on the balustrade of the organ, beneath the doors previously painted by Pellegrino, he created a story of S. Ermacora and Fortunatus, also in oils, which was elegant and well-designed. In the same city, to win the favor of the Signori Tinghi, he frescoed the façade of their palace. In this project, aiming to showcase his skills and demonstrate his mastery of architectural design and fresco painting, he crafted a series of sections and groups of various ornaments filled with figures in niches. In three large areas at the center of the work, he painted scenes with figures in color—two tall and narrow sections on either side, and one square-shaped section in the middle. In the latter, he depicted a Corinthian column set with its base in the sea, with a Siren on the right holding the column upright and a nude Neptune on the left supporting it from the other side. Above the capital of the column, there is a Cardinal's hat, which is said to be the emblem of Pompeo Colonna, a close friend of the palace's owners. In one of the other two sections, he portrayed the Giants being struck down by Jove's thunderbolts, with some dead bodies on the ground that were painted very well and beautifully foreshortened. On the other side is a heavenly scene filled with gods, and on earth, two giants, armed with clubs, are about to strike at Diana, who, defiantly and with great spirit, holds a blazing torch as if to set fire to one of their weapons.

THE DISPUTATION OF S. CATHARINE
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Licinio of Pordenone.
Piacenza: S. Maria di Campagna)
Alinari
View larger image
THE DISPUTATION OF S. CATHARINE
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Licinio of Pordenone.
Piacenza: S. Maria di Campagna)
Alinari
View larger image
At Spelimbergo, a large place fifteen miles above Udine, the balustrade and the doors of the organ in the great church are painted by the hand of the same master; on the outer side of one door is the Assumption [Pg 151] of Our Lady, and on the inner side S. Peter and S. Paul before Nero, gazing at Simon Magus in the air above; while on the other door there is the Conversion of S. Paul, and on the balustrade the Nativity of Christ.
At Spelimbergo, a large place fifteen miles above Udine, the balustrade and the doors of the organ in the great church are painted by the same master. On the outside of one door is the Assumption [Pg 151] of Our Lady, and on the inside are St. Peter and St. Paul before Nero, looking at Simon Magus in the air above; while on the other door, there is the Conversion of St. Paul, and on the balustrade, the Nativity of Christ.
Through this work, which is very beautiful, and many others, Pordenone came into repute and fame, and was summoned to Vicenza, whence, after having executed some works there, he made his way to Mantua, where he coloured a façade in fresco with marvellous grace for M. Paris, a gentleman of that city. Among other beautiful inventions which are in that work, much praise is due to a frieze of antique letters, one braccio and a half in height, at the top, below the cornice, among which, passing in and out of them, are many little children in various attitudes, all most beautiful.
Through this stunning work and many others, Pordenone gained recognition and fame, and was invited to Vicenza. After completing some projects there, he traveled to Mantua, where he painted a façade in fresco with incredible elegance for M. Paris, a gentleman from the city. Among the other beautiful features of that work, a frieze of ancient letters, one and a half braccia high, at the top, below the cornice, deserves special praise. In and around these letters, many little children in various poses can be seen, all incredibly lovely.
That work finished, he returned in great credit to Vicenza, and there, besides many other works, he painted the whole of the tribune of S. Maria di Campagna, although by reason of his departure a part remained unfinished, which was afterwards finished with great diligence by Maestro Bernardo da Vercelli. In the same church he painted two chapels in fresco: one with stories of S. Catherine, and the other with the Nativity of Christ and the Adoration of the Magi, both being worthy of the highest praise. He then painted some poetical pictures in the beautiful garden of M. Barnaba dal Pozzo, a doctor; and, in the said Church of S. Maria di Campagna, the picture of S. Augustine, which is on the left hand as one enters the church. All these most beautiful works brought it about that the gentlemen of that city persuaded him to take a wife there, and always held him in vast veneration.
After finishing that work, he returned to Vicenza with great acclaim, and there, in addition to many other pieces, he painted the entire tribune of S. Maria di Campagna. However, because he had to leave, a part of it remained unfinished, which was later completed with great care by Maestro Bernardo da Vercelli. In the same church, he painted two frescoed chapels: one featuring stories of S. Catherine and the other depicting the Nativity of Christ and the Adoration of the Magi, both of which were highly praised. He then created some artistic paintings in the lovely garden of M. Barnaba dal Pozzo, a doctor, and in the Church of S. Maria di Campagna, he painted the image of S. Augustine, located on the left as you enter the church. All these beautiful works led the city's gentlemen to encourage him to marry there, and they always held him in high esteem.
Going afterwards to Venice, where he had formerly executed some works, he painted a wall of S. Geremia, on the Grand Canal, and a panel-picture in oils for the Madonna del Orto, with many figures, making a particular effort to prove his worth in the S. John the Baptist. He also painted many scenes in fresco on the façade of the house of Martin d'Anna on the same Grand Canal; in particular, a Curtius on horseback in foreshortening, which has the appearance of being wholly in the round, like the Mercury flying freely through the air, not to speak of many other things that all prove his ability. That work pleased the whole city [Pg 152] of Venice beyond measure, and Pordenone was therefore extolled more highly than any other man who had ever worked in the city up to that time.
Afterwards, he went to Venice, where he had previously completed some works. He painted a wall at S. Geremia on the Grand Canal and created an oil panel painting for the Madonna del Orto, featuring many figures, especially focusing on his skill in portraying S. John the Baptist. He also painted numerous fresco scenes on the façade of Martin d'Anna's house along the Grand Canal; notably, a depiction of Curtius on horseback in foreshortening that looks almost three-dimensional, like Mercury soaring through the air, not to mention many other works that showcase his talent. This project greatly impressed the entire city of Venice [Pg 152], and as a result, Pordenone was praised more than any other artist who had ever worked in the city up to that point.
Among other reasons that caused him to give an incredible amount of effort to all his works, was his rivalry with the most excellent Tiziano; since, setting himself to compete with him, he hoped by means of continual study and by a bold and resolute method of working in fresco to wrest from the hands of Tiziano that sovereignty which he had gained with so many beautiful works; employing, also, unusual methods outside the field of art, such as that of being obliging and courteous and associating continually and of set purpose with great persons, making his interests universal, and taking a hand in everything. And, in truth, this rivalry was a great assistance to him, for it caused him to devote the greatest zeal and diligence in his power to all his works, so that they proved worthy of eternal praise.
Among other reasons that drove him to put in an incredible amount of effort into all his projects was his rivalry with the outstanding Tiziano. In trying to compete with him, he hoped that through constant study and a bold, determined approach to working in fresco, he could seize the dominance Tiziano had achieved with so many beautiful works. He also used unconventional methods beyond the realm of art, like being polite and friendly and deliberately associating with influential people, broadening his interests and getting involved in everything. This rivalry truly benefited him, as it motivated him to dedicate the utmost zeal and diligence to all his works, making them worthy of eternal praise.
For these reasons, then, he was commissioned by the Wardens of S. Rocco to paint in fresco the chapel of that church, with all the tribune. Setting his hand, therefore, to this work, he painted a God the Father in the tribune, with a vast number of children in various beautiful attitudes, radiating from Him. In the frieze of the same tribune he painted eight figures from the Old Testament, with the four Evangelists in the angles, and the Transfiguration of Christ over the high-altar; and in the two lunettes at the sides are the four Doctors of the Church. By the hand of the same master are two large pictures in the middle of the church: in one is Christ healing an endless number of the sick, all very well painted, and in the other is S. Christopher carrying Jesus Christ on his shoulders. On the wooden tabernacle of the same church, wherein the vessels of silver are kept, he painted a S. Martin on horseback, with many beggars who are bringing votive offerings, in a building in perspective.
For these reasons, he was commissioned by the Wardens of S. Rocco to paint a fresco in the chapel of that church, including the entire tribune. He got to work and painted God the Father in the tribune, surrounded by a large number of children in various beautiful poses, radiating from Him. In the frieze of the same tribune, he depicted eight figures from the Old Testament, with the four Evangelists in the corners, and the Transfiguration of Christ above the high altar; and in the two lunettes on the sides, he painted the four Doctors of the Church. The same artist created two large paintings in the middle of the church: one shows Christ healing a countless number of sick people, all very well painted, and the other depicts S. Christopher carrying Jesus Christ on his shoulders. On the wooden tabernacle of the same church, where the silver vessels are kept, he painted S. Martin on horseback, surrounded by many beggars bringing votive offerings, within a building drawn in perspective.

THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Licinio of Pordenone.
Treviso: Duomo)
Alinari
View larger image
THE ADORATION OF THE MAGI
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Licinio of Pordenone.
Treviso: Duomo)
Alinari
View larger image
This work, which was much extolled and brought him honour and profit, was the reason that M. Jacopo Soranzo, having become his intimate friend, caused him to be commissioned to paint the Sala de' Pregai in competition with Tiziano; and there he executed many pictures [Pg 153] with figures seen foreshortened from below, which are very beautiful, together with a frieze of marine monsters painted in oils round that hall. These works made him so dear to the Senate, that as long as he lived he always received an honourable salary from them. And since, out of rivalry, he always sought to do work in places where Tiziano had also worked, he painted for S. Giovanni di Rialto a S. John, as Almoner, giving alms to beggars, and also placed on an altar a picture of S. Sebastian, S. Rocco, and other saints, which was very beautiful, but yet not equal to the work of Tiziano, although many, more out of malignity than out of a love for the truth, exalted that of Giovanni Antonio. The same master painted in the cloister of S. Stefano many scenes in fresco from the Old Testament, and one from the New, divided one from another by various Virtues; and in these figures he displayed amazing foreshortenings, in which method of painting he always delighted, seeking to introduce them into his every composition with no fear of difficulties, and making them more ornate than any other painter.
This work, which was highly praised and brought him both fame and fortune, led M. Jacopo Soranzo, who became his close friend, to have him commissioned to paint the Sala de' Pregai in competition with Tiziano. There, he created many paintings [Pg 153] featuring figures seen in a foreshortened perspective from below, which are very beautiful, along with a frieze of sea creatures painted in oils around that hall. These works endeared him to the Senate, and throughout his life, he always received a respectable salary from them. Additionally, out of rivalry, he constantly aimed to work in places where Tiziano had also painted. For S. Giovanni di Rialto, he created a piece depicting St. John as Almoner, giving alms to beggars, and he also placed a painting of St. Sebastian, St. Rocco, and other saints on an altar. This work was lovely but not quite on par with Tiziano's, even though many, driven more by spite than a desire for honesty, praised Giovanni Antonio's work. The same master painted numerous fresco scenes from the Old Testament, and one from the New Testament, in the cloister of S. Stefano, separated by various Virtues; in these figures, he showcased incredible foreshortenings, a technique he always loved and sought to incorporate into every composition without fear of challenges, enhancing them more than any other painter.
Prince Doria had built a palace on the seashore in Genoa, and had commissioned Perino del Vaga, a very celebrated painter, to paint halls, apartments, and ante-chambers both in oils and in fresco, which are quite marvellous for the richness and beauty of the paintings. But seeing that Perino was not then giving much attention to the work, and wishing to make him do by the spur of emulation what he was not doing by himself, he sent for Pordenone, who began with an open terrace, wherein, following his usual manner, he executed a frieze of children, who are hurrying about in very beautiful attitudes and unloading a barque full of merchandise. He also painted a large scene of Jason asking leave from his uncle to go in search of the Golden Fleece. But the Prince, seeing the difference that there was between the work of Perino and that of Pordenone, dismissed the latter, and summoned in his place Domenico Beccafumi of Siena, an excellent painter and a rarer master than Pordenone. And he, glad to serve so great a Prince, did not scruple to leave his native city of Siena, where there are so many marvellous works by his hand; but he did not paint more than one single scene in that palace, because Perino brought everything to completion by himself.
Prince Doria built a palace on the coast in Genoa and hired Perino del Vaga, a well-known painter, to decorate the halls, apartments, and anterooms with both oil paintings and frescoes that are stunning for their richness and beauty. However, noticing that Perino wasn’t paying much attention to the work, and wanting to motivate him through competition, he called for Pordenone. Pordenone started with an open terrace, where he created a frieze of children in beautiful poses busily unloading a boat full of goods. He also painted a large scene of Jason asking his uncle for permission to go after the Golden Fleece. But when the Prince saw the difference between Perino's work and Pordenone's, he let Pordenone go and instead summoned Domenico Beccafumi from Siena, an excellent painter and a more unique master than Pordenone. Happy to serve such a great Prince, he had no qualms about leaving his hometown of Siena, which is home to many of his marvelous works; however, he only painted a single scene in that palace because Perino completed everything himself.
[Pg 154] Giovanni Antonio then returned to Venice, where he was given to understand that Ercole, Duke of Ferrara, had brought a great number of masters from Germany, and had caused them to begin to make fabrics in silk, gold, floss-silk, and wool, for his own use and pleasure, but that he had no good designers of figures in Ferrara, since Girolamo da Ferrara had more ability for portraits and separate things than for difficult and complicated scenes, which called for great power of art and design; and that he should enter the service of that Prince. Whereupon, desiring to gain fame no less than riches, he departed from Venice, and on reaching Ferrara was received with great warmth by the Duke. But a little time after his arrival, being attacked by a most grievous affliction of the chest, he took to his bed with the doom of death upon him, and, growing continually worse and finding no remedy, within three days or little more he finished the course of his life, at the age of fifty-six. This seemed a strange thing to the Duke, and also to Pordenone's friends; and there were not wanting men who for many months believed that he had died of poison. The body of Giovanni Antonio was buried with honour, and his death was a grief to many, particularly in Venice, for the reason that he was ready of speech and the friend and companion of many, and delighted in music; and his readiness and grace of speech came from his having given attention to the study of Latin. He always made his figures grand, and was very rich in invention, and so versatile that he could imitate everything very well; but he was, above all, resolute and most facile in works in fresco.
[Pg 154] Giovanni Antonio then returned to Venice, where he learned that Ercole, Duke of Ferrara, had brought in a large number of masters from Germany to begin creating fabrics in silk, gold, floss-silk, and wool for his own use and enjoyment. However, the Duke lacked skilled figure designers in Ferrara, since Girolamo da Ferrara was more adept at portraits and simpler subjects than complex and challenging scenes that required great artistic skill and design. Giovanni Antonio was encouraged to join the Duke's service. Eager to achieve fame as well as wealth, he left Venice, and upon arriving in Ferrara, he was warmly welcomed by the Duke. Shortly after his arrival, however, he was struck by a severe chest ailment, leading him to bed, facing a grim prognosis. As his condition worsened without any remedy, he passed away within three days, at the age of fifty-six. This sudden death shocked the Duke and Pordenone's friends, with some believing for many months that he was poisoned. Giovanni Antonio's body was buried with honors, and his death was mourned by many, especially in Venice, because he was articulate and had many friends and enjoyed music. His verbal eloquence and charm were a result of his studies in Latin. He always created grand figures, was rich in creativity, and was so adaptable that he could imitate everything well; but above all, he was determined and highly skilled in fresco works.
A disciple of Pordenone was Pomponio Amalteo of San Vito, who won by his good qualities the honour of becoming the son-in-law of his master. This Pomponio, always following that master in matters of art, has acquitted himself very well in all his works, as may be seen at Udine from the doors of the new organ, painted in oils, on the outer side of which is Christ driving the traders from the Temple, and on the inner side the story of the Pool of Bethesda and the Resurrection of Lazarus. In the Church of S. Francesco, in the same city, there is a panel-picture in oils by the hand of the same man, of S. Francis receiving the Stigmata, with some very beautiful landscapes, and with a sunrise from which, [Pg 155] in the midst of some rays of the greatest splendour, there radiates the celestial light, which pierces the hands, feet, and side of S. Francis, who, kneeling devoutly and full of love, receives it, while his companion lies on the ground, in foreshortening, all overcome with amazement. Pomponio also painted in fresco for the Friars of La Vigna, at the end of their refectory, Jesus Christ between the two disciples at Emmaus. In the township of San Vito, his native place, twenty miles distant from Udine, he painted in fresco the Chapel of the Madonna in the Church of S. Maria, in so beautiful a manner, and so much to the satisfaction of all, that he has won from the most reverend Cardinal Maria Grimani, Patriarch of Aquileia and Lord of San Vito, the honour of being enrolled among the nobles of that place.
A disciple of Pordenone was Pomponio Amalteo of San Vito, who earned the honor of becoming his master’s son-in-law thanks to his qualities. Pomponio always followed his master in art and has performed very well in all his works, as can be seen in Udine on the doors of the new organ, where on the outside is Christ driving the traders from the Temple, and on the inside the stories of the Pool of Bethesda and the Resurrection of Lazarus. In the Church of S. Francesco, also in the same city, there's an oil panel painting by him of S. Francis receiving the Stigmata, which features some very beautiful landscapes, and from a sunrise, [Pg 155] radiates celestial light amidst brilliant rays that pierce the hands, feet, and side of S. Francis, who kneels devotionally and lovingly receives it, while his companion lies on the ground, in foreshortening, completely astonished. Pomponio also painted a fresco for the Friars of La Vigna at the end of their refectory, depicting Jesus Christ between the two disciples at Emmaus. In the township of San Vito, his hometown, twenty miles from Udine, he painted a fresco of the Chapel of the Madonna in the Church of S. Maria so beautifully and to everyone's satisfaction that he earned the honor of being included among the nobles of that place from the most reverend Cardinal Maria Grimani, Patriarch of Aquileia and Lord of San Vito.
I have thought it right in this Life of Pordenone to make mention of these excellent craftsmen of Friuli, both because it appears to me that their talents deserve it, and to the end that it may be recognized in the account to be given later how much more excellent are those who, after such a beginning, have lived since that day, as will be related in the Life of Giovanni Ricamatori of Udine, to whom our age owes a very great obligation for his works in stucco and his grotesques.
I believed it was important in this Life of Pordenone to mention these outstanding craftsmen from Friuli, not only because I think their skills deserve recognition, but also so that it can be noted later how much more exceptional those who have come after them are, as will be discussed in the Life of Giovanni Ricamatori of Udine, to whom our time owes a significant debt for his work in stucco and his grotesques.
But returning to Pordenone; after the works mentioned above as having been executed by him at Venice in the time of the most illustrious Gritti, he died, as has been related, in the year 1540. And because he was one of the most able men that our age has possessed, and for the reason, above all, that his figures seem to be in the round and detached from their walls, and almost in relief, he can be numbered among those who have rendered assistance to art and benefit to the world.
But getting back to Pordenone; after the works mentioned earlier that he completed in Venice during the time of the most notable Gritti, he died, as previously stated, in the year 1540. He was one of the most skilled artists of our time, and especially because his figures appear three-dimensional and stand out from their backgrounds, almost in relief, he can be considered one of those who have contributed to art and benefited the world.
[Pg 157] GIOVANNI ANTONIO SOGLIANI
[Pg 159] LIFE OF GIOVANNI ANTONIO SOGLIANI
PAINTER OF FLORENCE
Very often do we see in the sciences of learning and in the more liberal of the manual arts, that those men who are melancholy are the most assiduous in their studies and show the greatest patience in supporting the burden of their labours; so that there are few of that disposition who do not become excellent in such professions. Even so did Giovanni Antonio Sogliani, a painter of Florence, whose cast of countenance was so cold and woeful that he looked like the image of melancholy; and such was the power of this humour over him that he gave little thought to anything but matters of art, with the exception of his household cares, through which he endured most grievous anxieties, although he had enough to live in comfort. He worked at the art of painting under Lorenzo di Credi for four-and-twenty years, living with him, honouring him always, and rendering him every sort of service. Having become during that time a very good painter, he showed afterwards in all his works that he was a most faithful disciple of his master and a close imitator of his manner. This was seen from his first paintings, in the Church of the Osservanza on the hill of San Miniato without Florence, for which he painted a panel-picture copied from the one that Lorenzo had executed for the Nuns of S. Chiara, containing the Nativity of Christ, and no less excellent than the one of Lorenzo.
We often notice in the fields of learning and in many of the more creative manual arts that people who are melancholic tend to be the most dedicated in their studies and show the greatest patience in handling the weight of their work. Because of this, there are few individuals with such a disposition who don't excel in these professions. Giovanni Antonio Sogliani, a painter from Florence, is an example; his expression was so cold and sorrowful that he seemed like a personification of melancholy. This state of mind had such a strong influence on him that he focused almost entirely on his art, aside from the worries of managing his household, which caused him significant anxiety, even though he had enough to live comfortably. He trained in painting under Lorenzo di Credi for twenty-four years, living with him, respecting him, and providing him with all kinds of support. Over time, he became a skilled painter and later demonstrated in all his works that he was a devoted disciple of his master and closely imitated his style. This is evident in his earliest paintings in the Church of the Osservanza on the hill of San Miniato, just outside Florence, where he created a panel painting based on one Lorenzo had made for the Nuns of S. Chiara, depicting the Nativity of Christ, which was just as remarkable as Lorenzo's work.
Afterwards, having left his master, he painted for the Church of S. Michele in Orto, at the commission of the Guild of Vintners, a S. Martin in oils, robed as a Bishop, which gave him the name of a very good master. And since Giovanni Antonio had a vast veneration for the works and the manner of Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco, and made great efforts to approach that manner in his colouring, it may be seen from a panel [Pg 160] which he began but did not finish, not being satisfied with it, how much he imitated that painter. This panel remained in his house during his lifetime as worthless: but after his death it was sold as a piece of old rubbish to Sinibaldo Gaddi, and he had it finished by Santi Titi dal Borgo, then a mere boy, and placed it in a chapel of his own in S. Domenico da Fiesole. In this work are the Magi adoring Jesus Christ, who is in the lap of His Mother, and in one corner is his own portrait from life, which is a passing good likeness.
After leaving his master, he painted for the Church of S. Michele in Orto, commissioned by the Guild of Vintners, a depiction of S. Martin in oils, dressed as a Bishop, which earned him the reputation of a skilled master. Giovanni Antonio greatly admired the works and style of Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco and worked hard to mimic that style in his coloring. This can be seen in a panel [Pg 160] that he started but didn’t finish because he wasn’t satisfied with it, showing how much he tried to imitate that painter. This panel sat in his house during his lifetime as something he considered worthless, but after his death, it was sold as old junk to Sinibaldo Gaddi. He had it completed by Santi Titi dal Borgo, who was just a young boy at the time, and placed it in a chapel he owned in S. Domenico da Fiesole. In this artwork, the Magi are adoring Jesus Christ, who is in His Mother's lap, and in one corner is his own life portrait, which is quite a good likeness.
He then painted for Madonna Alfonsina, the wife of Piero de' Medici, a panel-picture that was placed as a votive offering over the altar of the Chapel of the Martyrs in the Camaldolite Church at Florence: in which picture he painted the Crucifixion of S. Arcadio and other martyrs with their crosses in their arms, and two figures, half covered with draperies and half naked, kneeling with their crosses on the ground, while in the sky are some little angels with palms in their hands. This work, which was painted with much diligence, and executed with good judgment in the colouring and in the heads, which are very lifelike, was placed in the above-mentioned Camaldolite Church; but that monastery was taken on account of the siege of Florence from those Eremite Fathers, who used devoutly to celebrate the Divine offices in the church, and was afterwards given to the Nuns of S. Giovannino, of the Order of the Knights of Jerusalem, and finally destroyed; and the picture, being one which may be numbered among the best works that Sogliani painted, was placed by order of the Lord Duke Cosimo in one of the chapels of the Medici family in S. Lorenzo.
He then painted a panel for Madonna Alfonsina, the wife of Piero de' Medici, which was placed as a votive offering over the altar of the Chapel of the Martyrs in the Camaldolite Church in Florence. In this painting, he depicted the Crucifixion of St. Arcadius and other martyrs holding their crosses, along with two figures, half-covered with drapery and partly naked, kneeling with their crosses on the ground. In the sky, there are little angels holding palms. This work, painted with great care and skill in the colors and lifelike faces, was hung in the aforementioned Camaldolite Church. However, the monastery was taken over due to the siege of Florence from the Eremite Fathers, who used to devoutly celebrate the Divine offices in the church. It was later given to the Nuns of St. Giovannino, of the Order of the Knights of Jerusalem, and eventually destroyed. The painting, considered one of Sogliani's best works, was ordered by Duke Cosimo to be placed in one of the chapels of the Medici family in St. Lorenzo.
The same master executed for the Nuns of the Crocetta a Last Supper coloured in oils, which was much extolled at that time. And in a shrine in the Via de' Ginori, he painted in fresco for Taddeo Taddei a Crucifix with Our Lady and S. John at the foot, and in the sky some angels lamenting Christ, very lifelike—a picture truly worthy of praise, and a well-executed example of work in fresco. By the hand of Sogliani, also, is a Crucifix in the Refectory of the Abbey of the Black Friars in Florence, with angels flying about and weeping with much grace; and at the foot the Madonna, S. John, S. Benedict, S. Scholastica, and other [Pg 161] figures. For the Nuns of the Spirito Santo, on the hill of San Giorgio, he painted two pictures that are in their church, one of S. Francis, and the other of S. Elizabeth, Queen of Hungary and a sister of that Order. For the Company of the Ceppo he painted the banner for carrying in processions, which is very beautiful, representing on the front of it the Visitation of Our Lady, and on the other side S. Niccolò the Bishop, with two children dressed as Flagellants, one of whom holds his book and the other the three balls of gold. On a panel in S. Jacopo sopra Arno he painted the Trinity, with an endless number of little boys, S. Mary Magdalene kneeling, S. Catherine, S. James, and two figures in fresco standing at the sides, S. Jerome in Penitence and S. John; and in the predella he made his assistant, Sandrino del Calzolaio, execute three scenes, which won no little praise.
The same master created an oil painting of the Last Supper for the Nuns of the Crocetta, which was highly praised at the time. In a shrine on Via de' Ginori, he painted a fresco of a Crucifixion for Taddeo Taddei, featuring Our Lady and St. John at the foot, with some angels in the sky mourning Christ, very lifelike—a truly commendable piece and a great example of fresco work. Sogliani also painted a Crucifix in the Refectory of the Abbey of the Black Friars in Florence, with angels flying around and weeping gracefully; at the foot are the Madonna, St. John, St. Benedict, St. Scholastica, and other [Pg 161] figures. For the Nuns of the Spirito Santo on the hill of San Giorgio, he painted two pictures for their church: one of St. Francis and the other of St. Elizabeth, Queen of Hungary, who was a sister of that Order. For the Company of the Ceppo, he designed a banner for processions that is very beautiful, depicting the Visitation of Our Lady on one side and St. Niccolò the Bishop on the other, with two children dressed as Flagellants—one holding a book and the other holding three gold balls. On a panel in St. Jacopo sopra Arno, he painted the Trinity, with countless little boys, St. Mary Magdalene kneeling, St. Catherine, St. James, and two figures in fresco standing at the sides, St. Jerome in Penitence and St. John; and in the predella, he had his assistant, Sandrino del Calzolaio, create three scenes that received significant praise.
On the end wall of the Oratory of a Company in the township of Anghiari, he executed on panel a Last Supper in oils, with figures of the size of life; and on one of the two adjoining walls (namely, the sides) he painted Christ washing the feet of the Apostles, and on the other a servant bringing two vessels of water. The work is held in great veneration in that place, for it is indeed a rare thing, and one that brought him both honour and profit. A picture that he executed of a Judith who had cut off the head of Holofernes, being a very beautiful work, was sent to Hungary. And likewise another, in which was the Beheading of S. John the Baptist, with a building in perspective for which he had copied the exterior of the Chapter-house of the Pazzi, which is in the first cloister of S. Croce, was sent as a most beautiful work to Naples by Paolo da Terrarossa, who had given the commission for it. For one of the Bernardi, also, Sogliani executed two other pictures, which were placed in a chapel in the Church of the Osservanza at San Miniato, containing two lifesize figures in oils—S. John the Baptist and S. Anthony of Padua. But as for the panel that was to stand between them, Giovanni Antonio, being dilatory by nature and leisurely over his work, lingered over it so long that he who had given the commission died: wherefore that panel, which was to contain a Christ lying dead in the lap of His Mother, remained unfinished.
On the end wall of the Oratory of a Company in the township of Anghiari, he painted a Last Supper in oils on a panel, featuring life-sized figures. On one of the two adjacent walls, he depicted Christ washing the feet of the Apostles, and on the other, a servant bringing two vessels of water. This work is highly revered in the area, as it is indeed a rare piece that brought him both honor and profit. A painting he created of Judith, who beheaded Holofernes, was sent to Hungary and is considered very beautiful. Another piece, showing the Beheading of St. John the Baptist, included a building in perspective that he based on the exterior of the Chapter-house of the Pazzi, located in the first cloister of S. Croce; it was sent to Naples as a beautiful work by Paolo da Terrarossa, who had commissioned it. For one of the Bernardi, Sogliani also painted two other pictures, which were placed in a chapel in the Church of the Osservanza at San Miniato, featuring two life-sized figures in oils—St. John the Baptist and St. Anthony of Padua. However, the panel that was supposed to go between them was delayed because Giovanni Antonio was naturally slow and took his time on this work. He lingered over it so long that the person who commissioned it died, leaving the panel—intended to show Christ lying dead in the lap of His Mother—unfinished.

THE LEGEND OF S. DOMINIC
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani.
Florence: S.
Marco)
Anderson
View larger image
THE LEGEND OF S. DOMINIC
(After the fresco by Giovanni Antonio Sogliani.
Florence: S.
Marco)
Anderson
View larger image
[Pg 162] After these things, when Perino del Vaga, having departed from Genoa on account of his resentment against Prince Doria, was working at Pisa, where the sculptor Stagio da Pietrasanta had begun the execution of the new chapels in marble at the end of the nave of the Duomo, together with that space behind the high-altar, which serves as a sacristy, it was ordained that the said Perino, as will be related in his Life, with other masters, should begin to fill up those adornments of marble with pictures. But Perino being recalled to Genoa, Giovanni Antonio was commissioned to set his hand to the pictures that were to adorn the aforesaid recess behind the high-altar, and to deal in his works with the sacrifices of the Old Testament, as symbols of the Sacrifice of the Most Holy Sacrament, which was there over the centre of the high-altar. Sogliani, then, painted in the first picture the sacrifice that Noah and his sons offered when they had gone forth from the Ark, and afterwards those of Cain and of Abel; which were all highly extolled, but above all that of Noah, because some of the heads and parts of the figures in it were very beautiful. The picture of Abel is charming for its landscapes, which are very well executed, and the head of Abel himself, which is the very presentment of goodness; but quite the opposite is that of Cain, which has the mien of a truly sorry villain. And if Sogliani had pursued the work with energy instead of being dilatory, he would have been charged by the Warden, who had given him his commission and was much pleased with his manner and character, to execute all the work in that Duomo, whereas at that time, in addition to the pictures already mentioned, he painted no more than one panel, which was destined for the chapel wherein Perino had begun to work; and this he finished in Florence, but in such wise that it pleased the Pisans well enough and was held to be very beautiful. In it are the Madonna, S. John the Baptist, S. George, S. Mary Magdalene, S. Margaret, and other saints. His picture, then, having given satisfaction, Sogliani received from the Warden a commission for three other panels, to which he set his hand, but did not finish them in the lifetime of that Warden, in whose place Bastiano della Seta was elected; and he, perceiving that the business was moving but slowly, allotted four pictures for the aforesaid sacristy behind the high-altar [Pg 163] to Domenico Beccafumi of Siena, an excellent painter, who dispatched them very quickly, as will be told in the proper place, and also painted a panel there, and other painters executed the rest. Giovanni Antonio, then, working at his leisure, finished two other panels with much diligence, painting in each a Madonna surrounded by many saints. And finally, having made his way to Pisa, he there painted the fourth and last, in which he acquitted himself worse than in any other, either through old age, or because he was competing with Beccafumi, or for some other reason.
[Pg 162] After these events, Perino del Vaga, having left Genoa due to his anger towards Prince Doria, was working in Pisa, where the sculptor Stagio da Pietrasanta had started creating new marble chapels at the end of the nave of the Duomo, including the area behind the high altar that serves as a sacristy. It was arranged that Perino, as will be described in his biography, along with other artists, would begin filling those marble decorations with paintings. However, when Perino was summoned back to Genoa, Giovanni Antonio was commissioned to create the paintings that would enhance the recess behind the high altar, focusing on scenes of sacrifices from the Old Testament as symbols of the Sacrifice of the Most Holy Sacrament located at the center of the high altar. Sogliani then painted as his first piece the sacrifice that Noah and his sons offered after leaving the Ark, followed by those of Cain and Abel; these works were all highly praised, especially Noah's, because some of the heads and parts of the figures were remarkably beautiful. The depiction of Abel is delightful for its landscapes, which are very well rendered, and for the head of Abel himself, which embodies goodness. In contrast, Cain's head portrays a truly wretched villain. If Sogliani had continued the work with vigor instead of dragging his feet, he would have been tasked by the Warden, who appreciated his style and character, to complete all the work in that Duomo. At that time, besides the already mentioned pictures, he painted only one additional panel meant for the chapel where Perino had started working, which he finished in Florence. It was well received by the Pisans and considered very beautiful. It features the Madonna, St. John the Baptist, St. George, St. Mary Magdalene, St. Margaret, and other saints. Following the satisfaction with his painting, Sogliani was commissioned by the Warden for three more panels, which he began but did not complete during the lifetime of that Warden. After that Warden's death, Bastiano della Seta was chosen to take over; noticing that the work was progressing slowly, he assigned four paintings for the aforementioned sacristy behind the high altar [Pg 163] to Domenico Beccafumi of Siena, an excellent painter who completed them very quickly, as will be discussed in the appropriate section, and he also painted a panel there, while other artists took care of the rest. Giovanni Antonio, meanwhile, working at his own pace, diligently finished two more panels, each featuring a Madonna surrounded by various saints. Lastly, after arriving in Pisa, he painted the fourth and final panel, in which he performed worse than in any of the others, whether due to old age, because he was competing with Beccafumi, or for some other reason.
But the Warden Bastiano, perceiving the slowness of the man, and wishing to bring the work to an end, allotted the three other panels to Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo, who finished two of them, those that are beside the door of the façade. In the one nearer the Campo Santo is Our Lady with the Child in her arms, with S. Martha caressing Him. There, also, on their knees, are S. Cecilia, S. Augustine, S. Joseph, and S. Guido the Hermit, and in the foreground a nude S. Jerome, with S. Luke the Evangelist, and some little boys uplifting a piece of drapery, and others holding flowers. In the other, by the wish of the Warden, he painted another Madonna with her Son in her arms, S. James the Martyr, S. Matthew, S. Sylvester the Pope, and S. Turpè the Chevalier. Having to paint the Madonna, and not wishing to repeat the same composition (although he had varied it much in other respects), he made her with Christ dead in her arms, and those saints as it were round a Deposition from the Cross; and on the crosses, planted on high and made of tree-trunks, are fixed two naked Thieves, surrounded by horses and ministers of the crucifixion, with Joseph, Nicodemus, and the Maries; all for the satisfaction of the Warden, who wished that in those new pictures there should be included all the saints that there had been in the past in the various dismantled chapels, in order to renew their memory in the new works. One picture was still wanting to complete the whole, and this was executed by Bronzino, who painted a nude Christ and eight saints. And in this manner were those chapels brought to completion, all of which Giovanni Antonio could have done with his own hand if he had not been so slow.
But Warden Bastiano, noticing the man’s slow progress and wanting to finish the work, assigned the three other panels to Giorgio Vasari from Arezzo. He completed two of them, which are next to the entrance of the façade. In the one closer to the Campo Santo, there’s Our Lady holding the Child, with St. Martha affectionately beside Him. Also depicted are St. Cecilia, St. Augustine, St. Joseph, and St. Guido the Hermit on their knees, while in the foreground is a nude St. Jerome, along with St. Luke the Evangelist and some little boys lifting a piece of drapery, with others holding flowers. In the second panel, at the Warden’s request, he painted another Madonna with her Son in her arms, accompanied by St. James the Martyr, St. Matthew, St. Sylvester the Pope, and St. Turpè the Chevalier. Since he had to depict the Madonna and didn’t want to repeat the same composition (even though he varied it significantly in other ways), he portrayed her with the dead Christ in her arms, surrounded by those saints, resembling a Deposition from the Cross. High above, on tree-trunk crosses, are two naked Thieves, surrounded by horses and those involved in the crucifixion, along with Joseph, Nicodemus, and the Maries; all of this was meant to satisfy the Warden, who wanted the new artworks to include all the saints that had previously adorned the various dismantled chapels, renewing their memory. One picture was still needed to complete the set, which was created by Bronzino, who painted a nude Christ and eight saints. In this way, those chapels were finished, all of which Giovanni Antonio could have done himself if he hadn’t been so slow.
[Pg 164] And since Sogliani had won much favour with the Pisans, after the death of Andrea del Sarto he was commissioned to finish a panel for the Company of S. Francesco, which the said Andrea left only sketched; which panel is now in the building of that Company on the Piazza di S. Francesco at Pisa. The same master executed some rows of cloth-hangings for the Wardens of Works of the aforesaid Duomo, and many others in Florence, because he took pleasure in doing that sort of work, and above all in company with his friend Tommaso di Stefano, a painter of Florence.
[Pg 164] After Andrea del Sarto passed away, Sogliani gained a lot of support from the Pisans and was asked to complete a panel for the Company of S. Francesco, which Andrea had only partially sketched. This panel is currently located in the Company’s building on the Piazza di S. Francesco in Pisa. Sogliani also created several rows of cloth hangings for the Wardens of Works of the Duomo and many others in Florence, as he enjoyed this kind of work, especially when collaborating with his friend Tommaso di Stefano, a painter from Florence.
Being summoned by the Friars of S. Marco in Florence to paint a work in fresco at the head of their refectory, at the expense of one of their number, a lay-brother of the Molletti family, who had possessed a rich patrimony when in the world, Giovanni Antonio wished to paint there the scene of Jesus Christ feeding five thousand persons with five loaves and two fishes, in order to make the most of his powers; and he had already made the design for it, with many women and children and a great multitude of other people, when the friars refused to have that story, saying that they wanted something definite, simple, and familiar. Whereupon, to please them, he painted the scene when S. Dominic, being in the refectory with his friars and having no bread, made a prayer to God, when the table was miraculously covered with bread, brought by two angels in human form. In this work he made portraits of many friars who were then in the convent, which have the appearance of life, and particularly that of the lay-brother of the Molletti family, who is serving at table. Then, in the lunette above the table, he painted S. Dominic at the foot of a Crucifix, with Our Lady and S. John the Evangelist, who are weeping, and at the sides S. Catherine of Siena and S. Antonino, Archbishop of Florence, a brother of their Order. All this, for a work in fresco, was executed with much diligence and a high finish; but Sogliani would have been much more successful if he had executed what he had designed, because painters express the conceptions of their own minds better than those of others. On the other hand, it is only right that he who pays the piper should call the tune. The design for the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes is in the hands of Bartolommeo [Pg 165] Gondi, who, in addition to a large picture that he has by the hand of Sogliani, also possesses many drawings and heads painted from life on tinted paper, which he received from the wife of the painter, who had been very much his friend, after his death. And we, also, have in our book some drawings by the same hand, which are beautiful to a marvel.
Being asked by the Friars of S. Marco in Florence to paint a fresco for the wall of their dining hall, funded by one of their members, a lay-brother from the wealthy Molletti family, Giovanni Antonio wanted to depict the scene where Jesus Christ fed five thousand people with five loaves and two fish, showcasing his talent. He had already sketched it, featuring many women, children, and a large crowd, when the friars rejected that story, saying they preferred something more straightforward, simple, and familiar. To accommodate their wishes, he painted the scene where St. Dominic, sitting with his friars in the dining hall and without any bread, prayed to God, and the table was miraculously filled with bread brought by two angels in human form. In this work, he created lifelike portraits of many friars present in the convent, especially the lay-brother from the Molletti family, who is serving at the table. Then, in the lunette above the table, he depicted St. Dominic at the foot of a Crucifix, with Our Lady and St. John the Evangelist weeping beside him, and on either side, St. Catherine of Siena and St. Antonino, the Archbishop of Florence, who was a brother of their Order. All of this was executed with great care and a high level of detail in the fresco; however, Sogliani would have likely been more successful had he created what he originally envisioned because painters usually convey their own ideas better than those of others. On the flip side, it's only fair that the person funding the work gets to call the shots. The design for the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes is with Bartolommeo [Pg 165] Gondi, who, along with a large painting from Sogliani, also has many drawings and life studies on tinted paper that he received from the painter's wife, who was a close friend of his, after Sogliani's passing. We also have some drawings by the same artist in our collection that are stunningly beautiful.
Sogliani began for Giovanni Serristori a large panel-picture which was to be placed in S. Francesco dell' Osservanza, without the Porta a S. Miniato, with a vast number of figures, among which are some marvellous heads, the best that he ever made; but it was left unfinished at the death of the said Giovanni Serristori. Nevertheless, since Giovanni Antonio had received full payment, he finished it afterwards little by little, and gave it to Messer Alamanno di Jacopo Salviati, the son-in-law and heir of Giovanni Serristori; and he presented it, frame and all, to the Nuns of S. Luca, who have it over their high-altar in the Via di S. Gallo.
Sogliani started a large panel painting for Giovanni Serristori that was meant to be displayed in S. Francesco dell'Osservanza, just outside the Porta a S. Miniato. It featured a large number of figures, including some amazing heads, which were the best he ever created. Unfortunately, it was left unfinished when Giovanni Serristori passed away. However, since Giovanni Antonio had already been fully paid, he gradually completed it later on and gave it to Messer Alamanno di Jacopo Salviati, the son-in-law and heir of Giovanni Serristori. Alamanno then donated it, frame and all, to the Nuns of S. Luca, who have it displayed over their high altar on Via di S. Gallo.
Giovanni Antonio executed many other works in Florence, some of which are in the houses of citizens, and some were sent to various countries; but of these there is no need to make mention, for we have spoken of the most important. Sogliani was an upright person, very religious, always occupied with his own business, and never interfering with his fellow-craftsmen.
Giovanni Antonio created many other works in Florence, some of which are in the homes of local residents, and some were shipped to different countries; however, there's no need to mention them, as we've already discussed the most significant ones. Sogliani was a good person, very religious, always focused on his own work, and never meddled with his colleagues.
One of his disciples was Sandrino del Calzolaio, who painted the shrine that is on the Canto delle Murate, and, in the Hospital of the Temple, a S. John the Baptist who is assigning shelter to the poor; and he would have done more work, and good work, if he had not died as young as he did. Another of his disciples was Michele, who afterwards went to work with Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, whose name he took; and likewise Benedetto, who went with Antonio Mini, a disciple of Michelagnolo Buonarroti, to France, where he has executed many beautiful works. And another, finally, was Zanobi di Poggino, who has painted many works throughout the city.
One of his students was Sandrino del Calzolaio, who painted the shrine located on Canto delle Murate, and a painting of St. John the Baptist providing shelter to the poor in the Hospital of the Temple; he would have accomplished more remarkable work if he hadn't died so young. Another of his students was Michele, who later joined Ridolfo Ghirlandajo and took on his name; also, there was Benedetto, who went with Antonio Mini, a student of Michelangelo Buonarroti, to France, where he created many beautiful pieces. And lastly, there was Zanobi di Poggino, who painted many works throughout the city.
In the end, being weary and broken in health after having been long tormented by the stone, Giovanni Antonio rendered up his soul to God at the age of fifty-two. His death was much lamented, for he had been [Pg 166] an excellent man, and his manner had been much in favour, since he gave an air of piety to his figures, in such a fashion as pleases those who, delighting little in the highest and most difficult flights of art, love things that are seemly, simple, gracious, and sweet. His body was opened after his death, and in it were found three stones, each as big as an egg; but as long as he lived he would never consent to have them extracted, or to hear a word about them.
In the end, after suffering from kidney stones for a long time and feeling worn out and unhealthy, Giovanni Antonio gave his soul to God at the age of fifty-two. His death was deeply mourned because he had been an excellent man, and he had a favored style that brought a sense of piety to his figures, appealing to those who, while not particularly interested in the highest and most challenging aspects of art, appreciate things that are proper, simple, graceful, and sweet. After his death, his body was examined, and three stones were found inside, each the size of an egg; however, throughout his life, he never agreed to have them removed or even discussed.
[Pg 167] GIROLAMO DA TREVISO
[Pg 169] LIFE OF GIROLAMO DA TREVISO
PAINTER
Rarely does it happen that those who persist in working in the country in which they were born, are exalted by Fortune to that height of prosperity which their talents deserve; whereas, if a man tries many, he must in the end find one wherein sooner or later he succeeds in being recognized. And it often comes to pass that one who attains to the reward of his labours late in life, is prevented by the venom of death from enjoying it for long, even as we shall see in the case of Girolamo da Treviso.
Rarely do people who stick to working in their home country reach the level of success their skills deserve; however, if someone tries out different places, they will eventually find one where they become recognized. Often, a person who finally receives the reward for their hard work later in life is denied the chance to enjoy it for long due to the bitterness of death, just like we will see in the case of Girolamo da Treviso.
This painter was held to be a very good master; and although he was no great draughtsman, he was a pleasing colourist both in oils and in fresco, and a close imitator of the methods of Raffaello da Urbino. He worked much in his native city of Treviso; and he also executed many works in Venice, such as, in particular, the façade of the house of Andrea Udoni, which he painted in fresco, with some friezes of children in the courtyard, and one of the upper apartments: all of which he executed in colour, and not in chiaroscuro, because the Venetians like colour better than anything else. In a large scene in the middle of this façade is a Juno, seen from the thighs upwards, flying on some clouds with the moon on her head, over which are raised her arms, one holding a vase and the other a bowl. He also painted there a Bacchus, fat and ruddy, with a vessel that he is upsetting, and holding with one arm a Ceres who has many ears of corn in her hands. There, too, are the Graces, with five little boys who are flying below and welcoming them, in order, so they signify, to make the house of the Udoni abound with their gifts; and to show that the same house was a friendly haven for men of talent, [Pg 170] he painted Apollo on one side and Pallas on the other. This work was executed with great freshness, so that Girolamo gained from it both honour and profit.
This painter was considered a very skilled master; and although he wasn't a great draftsman, he was an impressive colorist in both oils and fresco, closely imitating the techniques of Raffaello da Urbino. He worked extensively in his hometown of Treviso and also created many pieces in Venice, including the façade of Andrea Udoni's house, which he painted in fresco, featuring some friezes of children in the courtyard and one in the upper apartments: all done in color rather than chiaroscuro, since the Venetians prefer color above all else. In a large scene in the middle of this façade, there's a depiction of Juno, shown from the thighs up, soaring on clouds with the moon on her head, her arms raised—one holding a vase and the other a bowl. He also painted a chubby, rosy-faced Bacchus, with a vessel he is spilling over, and holding Ceres with one arm, who has a handful of ears of corn. The Graces are also depicted, with five little boys flying beneath them and welcoming them, signifying that they bring abundance to the Udoni household; to show that this house was a welcoming place for talented individuals, he painted Apollo on one side and Pallas on the other. This work was executed with great vibrancy, earning Girolamo both honor and profit.
The same master painted a picture for the Chapel of the Madonna in S. Petronio, in competition with certain painters of Bologna, as will be related in the proper place. And continuing to live in Bologna, he executed many pictures there; and in S. Petronio, in the Chapel of S. Antonio da Padova, he depicted in oils, in imitation of marble, all the stories of the life of the latter Saint, in which, without a doubt, there may be perceived grace, judgment, excellence, and a great delicacy of finish. He painted a panel-picture for S. Salvatore, of the Madonna ascending the steps of the Temple, with some saints; and another of the Madonna in the sky, with some children, and S. Jerome and S. Catherine beneath, which is certainly the weakest work by his hand that is to be seen in Bologna. Over a great portal, also, in Bologna, he painted in fresco a Crucifix with Our Lady and S. John, all worthy of the highest praise. For S. Domenico, at Bologna, he executed a panel-picture in oils of Our Lady with some saints, which is the best of his works; it is near the choir, as one ascends to the tomb of S. Dominic, and in it is the portrait of the patron who had it painted. In like manner, he painted a picture for Count Giovanni Battista Bentivogli, who had the cartoon by the hand of Baldassarre of Siena, representing the story of the Magi: a work which he carried to a very fine completion, although it contained more than a hundred figures. There are also many other works by the hand of Girolamo in Bologna, both in private houses and in the churches. In Galiera he painted in chiaroscuro the façade of the Palace of the Teofamini, with another façade behind the house of the Dolfi, which is considered in the judgment of many craftsmen to be the best work that he ever executed in that city.
The same master painted a picture for the Chapel of the Madonna in S. Petronio, competing against certain painters from Bologna, as will be explained later. While living in Bologna, he created many paintings there; in S. Petronio, in the Chapel of S. Antonio da Padova, he used oil paint to create marble-like depictions of the stories from the life of that Saint, showcasing grace, judgment, excellence, and great detail. He painted a panel for S. Salvatore, depicting the Madonna ascending the steps of the Temple with some saints; and another of the Madonna in the sky with children, along with S. Jerome and S. Catherine below, which is definitely his weakest work found in Bologna. He also frescoed a Crucifix with Our Lady and S. John above a large portal in Bologna, all deserving of high praise. For S. Domenico in Bologna, he created an oil panel of Our Lady with several saints, regarded as his best work. It’s located near the choir as one goes up to S. Dominic's tomb and includes a portrait of the patron who commissioned it. Similarly, he painted a piece for Count Giovanni Battista Bentivogli, using a cartoon by Baldassarre of Siena that illustrated the story of the Magi: a work he completed very finely, containing over a hundred figures. There are also many other works by Girolamo throughout Bologna, both in private homes and churches. In Galiera, he painted in chiaroscuro on the façade of the Palace of the Teofamini, with another façade behind the Dolfi house, which many craftsmen consider his best work in that city.
He went to Trento, and, in company with other painters, painted the palace of the old Cardinal, from which he gained very great fame. Then, returning to Bologna, he gave his attention to the works that he had begun. Now it happened that there was much talk throughout Bologna about having a panel-picture painted for the Della Morte Hospital, [Pg 171] for which various designs were made by way of competition, some in drawing and some in colour. And since many thought that they had the first claim, some through interest and others because they held themselves to be most worthy of such a commission, Girolamo was left in the lurch; and considering that he had been wronged, not long afterwards he departed from Bologna. And thus the envy of others raised him to such a height of prosperity as he had never thought of; since, if he had been chosen for the work, it would have impeded the blessings that his good fortune had prepared for him. For, having made his way to England, he was recommended by some friends, who favoured him, to King Henry; and presenting himself before him, he entered into his service, although not as painter, but as engineer. Then, making trial of his skill in various edifices, copied from some in Tuscany and other parts of Italy, that King pronounced them marvellous, rewarded him with a succession of presents, and decreed him a provision of four hundred crowns a year; and he was given the means to build an honourable abode for himself at the expense of the King. Thereupon Girolamo, raised from one extreme of distress to the other extreme of grandeur, lived a most happy and contented life, thanking God and Fortune for having turned his steps to a country where men were so favourable to his talents. But this unwonted happiness was not destined to last long, for the war between the French and the English being continued, and Girolamo being charged with superintending all the work of the bastions and fortifications, the artillery, and the defences of the camp, it happened one day, when the city of Boulogne in Picardy was being bombarded, that a ball from a demi-cannon came with horrid violence and cut him in half on his horse's back. And thus, Girolamo being at the age of thirty-six, his life, his earthly honours, and all his greatness were extinguished at one and the same moment, in the year 1544.
He went to Trento, and along with other painters, worked on the palace of the old Cardinal, which brought him a lot of fame. Then, after returning to Bologna, he focused on the projects he had already started. It so happened that there was a lot of talk in Bologna about creating a panel painting for the Della Morte Hospital, [Pg 171] leading to various designs being submitted in a competition, some in drawing and others in color. Many people believed they had the strongest claim to the commission, whether due to connections or their perceived worthiness, leaving Girolamo overlooked. Feeling wronged, he soon left Bologna. Ironically, the jealousy of others propelled him to a level of success he had never imagined; if he had been chosen for the task, it would have held back the good fortune that awaited him. After making his way to England, he was recommended to King Henry by some supportive friends; presenting himself before the king, he entered his service—not as a painter, but as an engineer. After testing his skills on various buildings inspired by those in Tuscany and other parts of Italy, the King found them marvelous, rewarded him with numerous gifts, and granted him an annual allowance of four hundred crowns, as well as resources to build a respectable home at the King’s expense. Girolamo, having risen from extreme hardship to great fortune, lived a very happy and content life, grateful to God and Fortune for leading him to a place where his talents were appreciated. However, this unusual happiness was short-lived, as the ongoing war between the French and the English meant Girolamo was tasked with overseeing all the construction of bastions, fortifications, artillery, and camp defenses. One day, during the bombardment of the city of Boulogne in Picardy, a cannonball struck him violently, killing him instantly while he was on his horse. Thus, at the age of thirty-six, Girolamo's life, earthly honors, and all his greatness came to an end in the year 1544.
[Pg 173] POLIDORO DA CARAVAGGIO AND MATURINO
[Pg 175] LIVES OF POLIDORO DA CARAVAGGIO AND THE FLORENTINE MATURINO
PAINTERS
In the last age of gold, as the happy age of Leo X might have been called for all noble craftsmen and men of talent, an honoured place was held among the most exalted spirits by Polidoro da Caravaggio, a Lombard, who had not become a painter after long study, but had been created and produced as such by Nature. This master, having come to Rome at the time when the Loggie of the Papal Palace were being built for Leo under the direction of Raffaello da Urbino, carried the pail, or we should rather say the hod, full of lime, for the masons who were doing the work, until he had reached the age of eighteen. But, when Giovanni da Udine had begun to paint there, the building and the painting proceeding together, Polidoro, whose will and inclination were much drawn to painting, could not rest content until he had become intimate with all the most able of the young men, in order to study their methods and manners of art, and to set himself to draw. And out of their number he chose as his companion the Florentine Maturino, who was then working in the Papal Chapel, and was held to be an excellent draughtsman of antiquities. Associating with him, Polidoro became so enamoured of that art, that in a few months, having made trial of his powers, he executed works that astonished every person who had known him in his former condition. On which account, the work of the Loggie proceeding, he exercised his hand to such purpose in company with those young painters, who were well-practised and experienced in painting, and learned the art so divinely well, that he did not leave that work without carrying away the true glory of being considered the most noble and [Pg 176] most beautiful intellect that was to be found among all their number. Thereupon the love of Maturino for Polidoro, and of Polidoro for Maturino, so increased, that they determined like brothers and true companions to live and die together; and, uniting their ambitions, their purses, and their labours, they set themselves to work together in the closest harmony and concord. But since there were in Rome many who had great fame and reputation, well justified by their works, for making their paintings more lively and vivacious in colour and more worthy of praise and favour, there began to enter into their minds the idea of imitating the methods of Baldassarre of Siena, who had executed several façades of houses in chiaroscuro, and of giving their attention thenceforward to that sort of work, which by that time had come into fashion.
In the last golden age, which could be called the happy era of Leo X for all skilled artisans and talented individuals, Polidoro da Caravaggio held an esteemed position among the most distinguished figures. He was a Lombard who hadn’t become a painter through extensive study, but was instead naturally gifted. This master arrived in Rome while the Loggie of the Papal Palace were being constructed for Leo under Raffaello da Urbino’s guidance. He started out carrying a hod full of lime for the masons until he turned eighteen. However, when Giovanni da Udine began painting there, with the building and painting happening simultaneously, Polidoro, deeply drawn to painting, couldn’t settle until he became close with the best young artists to learn their techniques and styles, and to start drawing himself. He chose as his companion the Florentine Maturino, who was working in the Papal Chapel and was recognized for his excellent skills in drawing antiquities. By associating with Maturino, Polidoro fell in love with the art, and within a few months, after testing his abilities, he produced works that amazed everyone who had known him before. Consequently, while the Loggie project progressed, he practiced his craft alongside these proficient young painters, mastering the art with such skill that he left the project renowned as one of the noblest and most beautiful minds among them. As a result, the bond between Maturino and Polidoro grew so strong that they decided to live and die together like true brothers and companions. They combined their aspirations, finances, and efforts, working together in perfect unity and harmony. However, since Rome was filled with many who had established reputations based on their works, known for creating paintings that were more vibrant and deserving of praise, they began to consider imitating Baldassarre of Siena’s style, who had completed several house façades in chiaroscuro, and decided to focus on that type of work, which had become fashionable by that time.
They began one, therefore, on Montecavallo, opposite to S. Silvestro, in company with Pellegrino da Modena, which encouraged them to make further efforts to see whether this should be their profession; and they went on to execute another opposite to the side-door of S. Salvatore del Lauro, and likewise painted a scene by the side-door of the Minerva, with another, which is a frieze of marine monsters, above S. Rocco a Ripetta. And during this first period they painted a vast number of them throughout all Rome, but not so good as the others; and there is no need to mention them here, since they afterwards did better work of that sort. Gaining courage, therefore, from this, they began to study the antiquities of Rome, counterfeiting the ancient works of marble in their works in chiaroscuro, so that there remained no vase, statue, sarcophagus, scene, or any single thing, whether broken or entire, which they did not draw and make use of. And with such constancy and resolution did they give their minds to this pursuit, that they both acquired the ancient manner, the work of the one being so like that of the other, that, even as their minds were guided by one and the same will, so their hands expressed one and the same knowledge. And although Maturino was not as well assisted by Nature as Polidoro, so potent was the faithful imitation of one style by the two in company, that, wherever either of them placed his hand, the work of both one and the other, whether in composition, expression, or manner, appeared to be the same.
They started out at Montecavallo, across from S. Silvestro, alongside Pellegrino da Modena, which motivated them to push themselves further to see if this could be their career. They went on to create another piece near the side door of S. Salvatore del Lauro, and also painted a scene by the side door of the Minerva, along with a frieze of sea monsters above S. Rocco a Ripetta. Throughout this initial phase, they painted a huge number of works all over Rome, but they weren’t as good as the others; there’s no need to mention them here since they later produced better pieces of that kind. Gaining confidence from this experience, they began studying the ancient artifacts of Rome, replicating the old marble works in their chiaroscuro art so thoroughly that there wasn’t a vase, statue, sarcophagus, scene, or any single item, whether broken or whole, that they didn't sketch and use. They dedicated themselves to this pursuit with such determination and focus that they both mastered the ancient style, their works being so similar that, just as their minds followed the same intent, their hands showed the same skill. And even though Maturino wasn’t as naturally gifted as Polidoro, the faithful imitation of one style by the duo was so strong that, wherever either of them laid their hand, the output from both, whether in composition, expression, or technique, looked identical.
[Pg 177] In the Piazza di Capranica, on the way to the Piazza Colonna, they painted a façade with the Theological Virtues, and a frieze of very beautiful invention beneath the windows, including a draped figure of Rome representing the Faith, and holding the Chalice and the Host in her hands, who has taken captive all the nations of the earth; and all mankind is flocking up to bring her tribute, while the Turks, overcome at the last, are shooting arrows at the tomb of Mahomet; all ending in the words of Scripture, "There shall be one fold and one Shepherd." And, indeed, they had no equals in invention; of which we have witness in all their works, abounding in personal ornaments, vestments, foot-wear, and things bizarre and strange, and executed with an incredible beauty. And another proof is that their works are continually being drawn by all the foreign painters; wherefore they conferred greater benefits on the art of painting with the beautiful manner that they displayed and with their marvellous facility, than have all the others together who have lived from Cimabue downwards. It has been seen continually, therefore, in Rome, and is still seen, that all the draughtsmen are inclined more to the works of Polidoro and Maturino than to all the rest of our modern pictures.
[Pg 177] In the Piazza di Capranica, on the way to the Piazza Colonna, they painted a façade featuring the Theological Virtues and a beautifully designed frieze beneath the windows. This includes a draped figure of Rome, symbolizing Faith, who holds the Chalice and the Host in her hands and has captured all the nations of the earth. All of humanity is coming to offer her tribute, while the Turks, finally defeated, shoot arrows at the tomb of Mahomet; all culminating in the biblical phrase, "There shall be one fold and one Shepherd." Indeed, they were unmatched in creativity, as evidenced by their works, which are rich in personal adornments, garments, footwear, and other bizarre and intriguing items, all executed with incredible beauty. Another proof of their influence is that their works are constantly being referenced by foreign painters; thus, they contributed more to the art of painting with their beautiful style and marvelous skill than all the others combined who have lived since Cimabue. It has been consistently observed, and still is today in Rome, that all the draftsmen are more drawn to the works of Polidoro and Maturino than to all our other modern paintings.
In the Borgo Nuovo they executed a façade in sgraffito, and on the Canto della Pace another likewise in sgraffito; with a façade of the house of the Spinoli, not far from that last-mentioned, on the way to the Parione, containing athletic contests according to the custom of the ancients, and their sacrifices, and the death of Tarpeia. Near the Torre di Nona, on the side towards the Ponte S. Angelo, may be seen a little façade with the Triumph of Camillus and an ancient sacrifice. In the road that leads to the Imagine di Ponte, there is a most beautiful façade with the story of Perillus, showing him being placed in the bronze bull that he had made; wherein great effort may be seen in those who are thrusting him into that bull, and terror in those who are waiting to behold a death so unexampled, besides which there is the seated figure of Phalaris (so I believe), ordaining with an imperious air of great beauty the punishment of the inhuman spirit that had invented a device so novel and so cruel in order to put men to death with greater suffering. In this work, also, [Pg 178] may be perceived a very beautiful frieze of children, painted to look like bronze, and other figures. Higher up than this they painted the façade of the house where there is the image which is called the Imagine di Ponte, wherein are seen several stories illustrated by them, with the Senatorial Order dressed in the garb of ancient Rome. And in the Piazza della Dogana, beside S. Eustachio, there is a façade of battle-pieces; and within that church, on the right as one enters, may be perceived a little chapel with figures painted by Polidoro.
In Borgo Nuovo, they created a façade featuring sgraffito, and on Canto della Pace, another one with the same technique; also, there’s the façade of the Spinoli house, not far from the previous one, on the way to Parione, depicting athletic contests in the style of the ancients, their sacrifices, and the death of Tarpeia. Near Torre di Nona, on the side facing Ponte S. Angelo, you can see a small façade showing the Triumph of Camillus and an ancient sacrifice. On the road leading to the Imagine di Ponte, there’s a stunning façade portraying the story of Perillus, illustrating him being placed inside the bronze bull he had created; you can see the great effort of those pushing him into the bull, along with the terror of those waiting to witness such an unprecedented death, plus there’s a seated figure of Phalaris (I believe), imposing and beautifully commanding the punishment of the cruel mind that invented such a novel and inhumane method of execution. In this work, [Pg 178] you can also spot a beautiful frieze of children, painted to resemble bronze, along with other figures. Above this, they painted the façade of the house where the image known as the Imagine di Ponte is located, showcasing several stories illustrated by them, with the Senatorial Order dressed in ancient Roman attire. In Piazza della Dogana, next to S. Eustachio, there’s a façade featuring battle scenes; and inside that church, on the right as you enter, you can see a small chapel with figures painted by Polidoro.
They also executed another above the Farnese Palace for the Cepperelli, and a façade behind the Minerva in the street that leads to the Maddaleni; and in the latter, which contains scenes from Roman history, may be seen, among other beautiful things, a frieze of children in triumph, painted to look like bronze, and executed with supreme grace and extraordinary beauty. On the façade of the Buoni Auguri, near the Minerva, are some very beautiful stories of Romulus, showing him when he is marking out the site of his city with the plough, and when the vultures are flying over him; wherein the vestments, features, and persons of the ancients are so well imitated, that it truly appears as if these were the very men themselves. Certain it is that in that field of art no man ever had such power of design, such practised mastery, a more beautiful manner, or greater facility. And every craftsman is so struck with wonder every time that he sees these works, that he cannot but be amazed at the manner in which Nature has been able in this age to present her marvels to us by means of these men.
They also created another piece above the Farnese Palace for the Cepperelli, and a façade behind the Minerva on the street leading to the Maddaleni. In the latter, which depicts scenes from Roman history, you can see, among other stunning features, a frieze of triumphant children, painted to look like bronze, executed with exceptional grace and extraordinary beauty. On the façade of the Buoni Auguri, near the Minerva, there are some beautiful depictions of Romulus, showing him as he marks the site of his city with a plough and when the vultures are flying overhead. The clothing, features, and characters of the ancients are so expertly replicated that it truly seems as if those were the very men themselves. It’s clear that in this field of art, no one has ever had such power in design, such practiced mastery, a more beautiful style, or greater ease. Every craftsman is so struck with wonder every time he sees these works that he can’t help but marvel at how Nature has managed to present her wonders to us through these artists.
Below the Corte Savella, also, on the house bought by Signora Costanza, they painted the Rape of the Sabines, a scene which reveals the raging desire of the captors no less clearly than the terror and panic of the wretched women thus carried off by various soldiers, some on horseback and others in other ways. And not only in this one scene are there such conceptions, but also (and even more) in the stories of Mucius and Horatius, and in the Flight of Porsena, King of Tuscany. In the garden of M. Stefano dal Bufalo, near the Fountain of Trevi, they executed some most beautiful scenes of the Fount of Parnassus, in which they made grotesques and little figures, painted very well in colour. On the [Pg 179] house of Baldassini, also, near S. Agostino, they executed scenes and sgraffiti, with some heads of Emperors over the windows in the court. On Montecavallo, near S. Agata, they painted a façade with a vast number of different stories, such as the Vestal Tuccia bringing water from the Tiber to the Temple in a sieve, and Claudia drawing the ship with her girdle; and also the rout effected by Camillus while Brennus is weighing the gold. On another wall, round the corner, are Romulus and his brother being suckled by the wolf, and the terrible combat of Horatius, who is defending the head of the bridge, alone against a thousand swords, while behind him are many very beautiful figures in various attitudes, working with might and main to hew away the bridge with pickaxes. There, also, is Mucius Scævola, who, before the eyes of Porsena, is burning his own hand, which had erred in slaying the King's minister in place of the King; and in the King's face may be seen disdain and a desire for vengeance. And within that house they executed a number of landscapes.
Below the Corte Savella, on the house bought by Signora Costanza, they depicted the Rape of the Sabines, a scene that clearly shows the furious desire of the captors as well as the terror and panic of the unfortunate women being taken away by various soldiers, some on horseback and others in different ways. Not only in this scene, but also (and even more so) in the tales of Mucius and Horatius, and in the Flight of Porsena, King of Tuscany, are there such concepts. In the garden of M. Stefano dal Bufalo, near the Fountain of Trevi, they created some stunning scenes of the Fount of Parnassus, where they made grotesques and small figures painted beautifully in color. On the [Pg 179] house of Baldassini, near S. Agostino, they executed scenes and sgraffiti, with heads of Emperors above the windows in the courtyard. On Montecavallo, near S. Agata, they painted a façade filled with numerous stories, such as the Vestal Tuccia bringing water from the Tiber to the Temple in a sieve, and Claudia drawing the ship with her girdle; they also depicted the victory of Camillus while Brennus weighs the gold. On another wall, around the corner, are Romulus and his brother being suckled by the wolf, and the fierce battle of Horatius, who defends the head of the bridge alone against a thousand swords, while behind him are many beautiful figures in various poses, working hard to hew away the bridge with pickaxes. There is also Mucius Scævola, who, before the eyes of Porsena, is burning his own hand for mistakenly killing the King’s minister instead of the King; and on the King’s face, disdain and a desire for vengeance can be seen. Inside that house, they created a number of landscapes.
They decorated the façade of S. Pietro in Vincula, painting therein stories of S. Peter, with some large figures of Prophets. And so widespread was the fame of these masters by reason of the abundance of their work, that the pictures painted by them with such beauty in public places enabled them to win extraordinary praise in their lifetime, with glory infinite and eternal through the number of their imitators after death. On a façade, also, in the square where stands the Palace of the Medici, behind the Piazza Navona, they painted the Triumphs of Paulus Emilius, with a vast number of other Roman stories. And at S. Silvestro di Montecavallo they executed some little things for Fra Mariano, both in the house and in the garden; and in the church they painted his chapel, with two scenes in colour from the life of S. Mary Magdalene, in which the disposition of the landscapes is executed with supreme grace and judgment. For Polidoro, in truth, executed landscapes and groups of trees and rocks better than any other painter, and it is to him that art owes that facility which our modern craftsmen show in their works.
They decorated the facade of S. Pietro in Vincula, painting stories of S. Peter along with some large figures of Prophets. The reputation of these artists grew immensely due to their prolific work, as the beautiful paintings they created in public places earned them remarkable praise during their lives and resulted in lasting glory through the many imitators they inspired after their deaths. On another facade, in the square where the Palace of the Medici is located, behind the Piazza Navona, they painted the Triumphs of Paulus Emilius, among a wide range of other Roman stories. At S. Silvestro di Montecavallo, they created some smaller works for Fra Mariano, both inside the house and in the garden; in the church, they painted his chapel with two colorful scenes from the life of S. Mary Magdalene, where the arrangement of the landscapes is executed with outstanding grace and skill. Polidoro, in particular, excelled at painting landscapes and groups of trees and rocks better than any other artist, and it is to him that contemporary craftsmen owe the ease they demonstrate in their work.
They also painted many apartments and friezes in various houses at Rome, executing them with colours in fresco and in distemper; but [Pg 180] these works were attempted by them as trials, because they were never able to achieve with colours that beauty which they always displayed in their works in chiaroscuro, in their imitations of bronze, or in terretta. This may still be seen in the house of Torre Sanguigna, which once belonged to the Cardinal of Volterra, on the façade of which they painted a most beautiful decoration in chiaroscuro, and in the interior some figures in colour, the painting of which is so badly executed, that in it they diverted from its true excellence the good design which they always had. And this appeared all the more strange because of there being beside them an escutcheon of Pope Leo, with nude figures, by the hand of Giovan Francesco Vetraio, who would have done extraordinary things if death had not taken him from our midst. However, not cured by this of their insane confidence, they also painted some children in colour for the altar of the Martelli in S. Agostino at Rome, a work which Jacopo Sansovino completed by making a Madonna of marble; and these children appear to be by the hands, not of illustrious masters, but of simpletons just beginning to learn. Whereas, on the side where the altar-cloth covers the altar, Polidoro painted a little scene of a Dead Christ with the Maries, which is a most beautiful work, showing that in truth that sort of work was more their profession than the use of colours.
They also painted many apartments and friezes in various houses in Rome, using fresco and distemper techniques. However, these works were more like experiments for them because they could never achieve the beauty in colors that they consistently displayed in their chiaroscuro works, imitations of bronze, or in terretta. This can still be seen in the house of Torre Sanguigna, which used to belong to the Cardinal of Volterra. On its façade, they painted an exquisite decoration in chiaroscuro, and inside, there are some colored figures that are executed so poorly that they detract from the good design they usually maintained. This felt even more surprising since next to them is a coat of arms of Pope Leo, adorned with nude figures, created by Giovan Francesco Vetraio, who would have accomplished extraordinary things if death hadn’t cut his life short. Yet, undeterred by this, they also painted some children in color for the altar of the Martelli in S. Agostino in Rome, a project completed by Jacopo Sansovino, who added a marble Madonna. These children seem to be done not by renowned masters but by novices just beginning to learn. Meanwhile, on the side covered by the altar cloth, Polidoro painted a little scene of the Dead Christ with the Maries, which is a beautiful work, clearly indicating that this type of work suited them much better than color painting.
Returning, therefore, to their usual work, they painted two very beautiful façades in the Campo Marzio; one with the stories of Ancus Martius, and the other with the Festivals of the Saturnalia, formerly celebrated in that place, with all the two-horse and four-horse chariots circling round the obelisks, which are held to be most beautiful, because they are so well executed both in design and in nobility of manner, that they reproduce most vividly those very spectacles as representations of which they were painted. On the Canto della Chiavica, on the way to the Corte Savella, they painted a façade which is a divine thing, and is held to be the most beautiful of all the beautiful works that they executed; for, in addition to the story of the maidens passing over the Tiber, there is at the foot, near the door, a Sacrifice painted with marvellous industry and art, wherein may be seen duly represented all the instruments and all those ancient customs that used to have a place in sacrifices of that [Pg 181] kind. Near the Piazza del Popolo, below S. Jacopo degli Incurabili, they painted a façade with stories of Alexander the Great, which is held to be very fine; and there they depicted the ancient statues of the Nile and the Tiber from the Belvedere. Near S. Simeone they painted the façade of the Gaddi Palace, which is truly a cause of marvel and amazement, when one observes the lovely vestments in it, so many and so various, and the vast number of ancient helmets, girdles, buskins, and barques, adorned with all the delicacy and abundance of detail that an inventive imagination could conceive. There, with a multitude of beautiful things which overload the memory, are represented all the ways of the ancients, the statues of sages, and most lovely women: and there are all the sorts of ancient sacrifices with their ritual, and an army in the various stages between embarking and fighting with an extraordinary variety of arms and implements, all executed with such grace and finished with such masterly skill, that the eye is dazzled by the vast abundance of beautiful inventions. Opposite to this is a smaller façade, which could not be improved in beauty and variety; and there, in the frieze, is the story of Niobe causing herself to be worshipped, with the people bringing tribute, vases, and various kinds of gifts; which story was depicted by them with such novelty, grace, art, force of relief and genius in every part, that it would certainly take too long to describe the whole. Next, there follows the wrath of Latona, and her terrible vengeance on the children of the over-proud Niobe, whose seven sons are slain by Phœbus and the seven daughters by Diana; with an endless number of figures in imitation of bronze, which appear to be not painted but truly of metal. Above these are executed other scenes, with some vases in imitation of gold, innumerable things of fancy so strange that mortal eye could not picture anything more novel or more beautiful, and certain Etruscan helmets; but one is left confused by the variety and abundance of the conceptions, so beautiful and so fanciful, which issued from their minds. These works have been imitated by a vast number of those who labour at that branch of art. They also painted the courtyard of that house, and likewise the loggia, which they decorated with little grotesques in colour that are held to be divine. In short, all that they touched they brought to [Pg 182] perfection with infinite grace and beauty; and if I were to name all their works, I should fill a whole book with the performances of these two masters alone, since there is no apartment, palace, garden, or villa in Rome that does not contain some work by Polidoro and Maturino.
Returning to their usual work, they painted two very beautiful façades in Campo Marzio; one featuring the stories of Ancus Martius and the other showcasing the Festivals of the Saturnalia, which used to be celebrated there, with all the two-horse and four-horse chariots circling around the obelisks. These are considered truly stunning because they are so well executed in both design and bravado that they vividly represent the spectacles they depict. On the Canto della Chiavica, leading to the Corte Savella, they created a façade that is divine and recognized as the most beautiful of all their works; it tells the story of the maidens crossing the Tiber and includes a Sacrifice at the doorstep, painted with incredible skill and artistry, showcasing all the tools and ancient customs associated with such sacrifices from that [Pg 181] time. Near the Piazza del Popolo, beneath S. Jacopo degli Incurabili, they painted a façade illustrating the stories of Alexander the Great, which is regarded as very impressive; there, they depicted the ancient statues of the Nile and the Tiber from the Belvedere. Close to S. Simeone, they worked on the façade of the Gaddi Palace, which causes true awe when one sees the beautiful garments depicted, as numerous and varied as they are, along with a great number of ancient helmets, belts, boots, and boats, all adorned with intricate details as imagined. There, amidst countless beautiful elements that overwhelm the memory, are representations of all the ways of the ancients, statues of wise men, and highly attractive women; along with the various types of ancient sacrifices and their rituals, and a military force in different stages between boarding and battling, featuring an extraordinary array of weapons and tools, all executed with such elegance and finished with such masterful skill that the eye is dazzled by the sheer volume of beautiful inventions. Across from this is a smaller façade, which can't be improved in beauty and variety; there, in the frieze, is the story of Niobe seeking worship, with people bringing tribute, vases, and various gifts; this narrative was portrayed by them with such novelty, grace, artistry, relief, and genius in every detail that describing it all would take far too long. Following this are scenes depicting the wrath of Latona and her fierce revenge on the children of the over-proud Niobe, whose seven sons are killed by Phœbus and her seven daughters by Diana; with countless figures mimicking bronze that seem not to be painted but truly made of metal. Above these scenes are others, with vases looking like gold, and countless imaginative elements so strange that no mortal eye could envision anything more original or beautiful, along with some Etruscan helmets; it leaves one overwhelmed by the variety and richness of the ideas, so beautiful and imaginative, that came from their minds. These works have inspired numerous artists working in that style. They also painted the courtyard of that house and the loggia, which they adorned with small colorful grotesques that are deemed divine. In short, everything they touched became perfected with infinite grace and beauty; and if I were to list all their works, I would fill an entire book with the achievements of these two masters alone since there is no room, palace, garden, or villa in Rome that doesn’t feature a work by Polidoro and Maturino.
Now, while Rome was rejoicing and clothing herself in beauty with their labours, and they were awaiting the reward of all their toil, the envy of Fortune, in the year 1527, sent Bourbon to Rome; and he gave that city over to sack. Whereupon was divided the companionship not only of Polidoro and Maturino, but of all the thousands of friends and relatives who had broken bread together for so many years in Rome. Maturino took to flight, and no long time passed before he died, so it is believed in Rome, of plague, in consequence of the hardships that he had suffered in the sack, and was buried in S. Eustachio. Polidoro turned his steps to Naples; but on his arrival, the noblemen of that city taking but little interest in fine works of painting, he was like to die of hunger. Working, therefore, at the commission of certain painters, he executed a S. Peter in the principal chapel of S. Maria della Grazia; and in this way he assisted those painters in many things, more to save his life than for any other reason. However, the fame of his talents having spread abroad, he executed for Count ... a vault painted in distemper, together with some walls, all of which is held to be very beautiful work. In like manner, he executed a courtyard in chiaroscuro for Signor ..., with some loggie, which are very beautiful, rich in ornaments, and well painted. He also painted for S. Angelo, beside the Pescheria at Naples, a little panel in oils, containing a Madonna and some naked figures of souls in torment, which is held to be most beautiful, but more for the drawing than for the colouring; and likewise some pictures for the Chapel of the High-Altar, each with a single full-length figure, and all executed in the same manner.
Now, while Rome was celebrating and adorning herself with the fruits of their labor, and they were anticipating the rewards of all their hard work, the jealousy of Fortune brought Bourbon to Rome in 1527, and he sacked the city. This event split apart the friendships not only of Polidoro and Maturino but also of thousands of friends and family who had shared meals together in Rome for many years. Maturino fled, and soon after, it is believed he died in Rome from the plague due to the hardships he endured during the sack, and he was buried in S. Eustachio. Polidoro made his way to Naples, but upon his arrival, he found that the noblemen of the city showed little interest in fine painting, leaving him at risk of starving. Therefore, working on commissions from certain painters, he created a St. Peter in the main chapel of S. Maria della Grazia; this helped him contribute to those painters more to survive than for any other reason. However, as his talent gained recognition, he painted a ceiling in distemper for Count ..., along with some walls, all of which is considered very beautiful work. Likewise, he painted a courtyard in chiaroscuro for Signor ..., along with some porticoes, which are exquisite, richly decorated, and well-painted. He also created a small oil panel for S. Angelo, next to the Pescheria in Naples, depicting a Madonna and some naked figures of souls in torment, which is regarded as beautiful, more for the drawing than the coloring; and he painted some pieces for the High-Altar Chapel, each featuring a single full-length figure, all executed in the same style.
It came to pass that Polidoro, living in Naples and seeing his talents held in little esteem, determined to take his leave of men who thought more of a horse that could jump than of a master whose hands could give to painted figures the appearance of life. Going on board ship, therefore, he made his way to Messina, where, finding more consideration [Pg 183] and more honour, he set himself to work; and thus, working continually, he acquired good skill and mastery in the use of colour. Thereupon he executed many works, which are dispersed in various places; and turning his attention to architecture, he gave proof of his worth in many buildings that he erected. After a time, Charles V passing through Messina on his return from victory in Tunis, Polidoro made in his honour most beautiful triumphal arches, from which he gained vast credit and rewards. And then this master, who was always burning with desire to revisit Rome, which afflicts with an unceasing yearning those who have lived there many years, when making trial of other countries, painted as his last work in Messina a panel-picture of Christ bearing the Cross, executed in oils with much excellence and very pleasing colour. In it he made a number of figures accompanying Christ to His Death—soldiers, pharisees, horses, women, children, and the Thieves in front; and he kept firmly before his mind the consideration of how such an execution must have been marshalled, insomuch that his nature seemed to have striven to show its highest powers in this work, which is indeed most excellent. After this he sought many times to shake himself free of that country, although he was looked upon with favour there; but he had a reason for delay in a woman, beloved by him for many years, who detained him with her sweet words and cajoleries. However, so mightily did his desire to revisit Rome and his friends work in him, that he took from his bank a good sum of money that he possessed, and, wholly determined, prepared to depart.
Polidoro, living in Naples and feeling unappreciated for his talents, decided to leave behind people who valued a horse that could jump more than a master who could make painted figures look lifelike. So, he boarded a ship to Messina, where he found more respect and recognition. He dedicated himself to his craft and, through continuous work, honed his skills in color. He created many pieces that are now spread across various locations, and he also turned his focus to architecture, proving his worth with several buildings he constructed. Eventually, when Charles V passed through Messina on his way back from his victory in Tunis, Polidoro created stunning triumphal arches in his honor, which earned him great acclaim and rewards. This artist, who was always eager to return to Rome—a place that leaves an unending longing in those who have lived there for many years—completed his last work in Messina: a panel painting of Christ bearing the Cross, done in oils with remarkable quality and pleasing colors. In this piece, he painted many figures accompanying Christ to His Death—soldiers, Pharisees, horses, women, children, and the Thieves ahead of Christ—and he was deeply focused on how such a composition should be arranged. His effort in this piece showcased his highest abilities, making it truly outstanding. After this, he tried several times to leave the city, even though he was well-regarded there; however, he was held back by a woman he had loved for many years, who kept him with her sweet words and flattery. Still, the strong urge to revisit Rome and his friends motivated him to withdraw a significant amount of money from his bank and, fully determined, he prepared to leave.
Polidoro had employed as his assistant for a long time a lad of the country, who bore greater love to his master's money than to his master; but, the money being kept, as has been said, in the bank, he was never able to lay his hands upon it and carry it off. Wherefore, an evil and cruel thought entering his head, he resolved to put his master to death with the help of some accomplices, on the following night, while he was sleeping, and then to divide the money with them. And so, assisted by his friends, he set upon Polidoro in his first sleep, while he was slumbering deeply, and strangled him with a cloth. Then, giving him several wounds, they made sure of his death; and in order to prove that it was [Pg 184] not they who had done it, they carried him to the door of the woman whom he had loved, making it appear that her relatives or other persons of the house had killed him. The assistant gave a good part of the money to the villains who had committed so hideous an outrage, and bade them be off. In the morning he went in tears to the house of a certain Count, a friend of his dead master, and related the event to him; but for all the diligence that was used for many days in seeking for the perpetrator of the crime, nothing came to light. By the will of God, however, nature and virtue, in disdain at being wounded by the hand of fortune, so worked in one who had no interest in the matter, that he declared it to be impossible that any other but the assistant himself could have committed the murder. Whereupon the Count had him seized and put to the torture, and without the application of any further torment he confessed the crime and was condemned by the law to the gallows; but first he was torn with red-hot pincers on the way to execution, and finally quartered.
Polidoro had been using a local guy as his assistant for a long time, who cared more about his boss's money than about his boss himself. However, since the money was kept in the bank, he could never get his hands on it and run away with it. So, an evil thought entered his mind: he decided to kill his boss with the help of some accomplices that very night while he was sleeping, and then share the money with them. With the help of his friends, he attacked Polidoro while he was deep in sleep, strangling him with a cloth. After inflicting several wounds to ensure he was dead, they played it off like it was someone else who had done it by leaving him at the door of the woman he loved, making it seem like her family or others from her house were responsible. The assistant gave a good chunk of the money to the villains who committed the horrific act and told them to leave. In the morning, he went, crying, to the house of a Count, a friend of his deceased boss, and told him what happened. Despite the many days spent searching for the criminal, nothing came to light. However, by divine intervention, nature and virtue worked through someone unrelated to the case, declaring it impossible for anyone but the assistant to have committed the murder. The Count then had him arrested and tortured, and without any further coercion, he confessed to the crime and was sentenced to hang; but first, he was tortured with red-hot pincers on the way to his execution, and ultimately he was quartered.
For all this, however, life was not restored to Polidoro, nor was there given back to the art of painting a genius so resolute and so extraordinary, such as had not been seen in the world for many an age. If, indeed, at the time when he died, invention, grace, and boldness in the painting of figures could have laid down their lives, they would have died with him. Happy was the union of nature and art which embodied a spirit so noble in human form; and cruel was the envy and hatred of his fate and fortune, which robbed him of life with so strange a death, but shall never through all the ages rob him of his name. His obsequies were performed with full solemnity, and he was given burial in the Cathedral Church, lamented bitterly by all Messina, in the year 1543.
For all this, though, life wasn't brought back to Polidoro, nor was a talent for painting of such remarkable and unique brilliance, like the world hadn't seen in ages, returned to art. If, at the moment he died, creativity, elegance, and daring in figure painting could have given up their lives, they would have died with him. It was a fortunate blend of nature and art that captured such a noble spirit in human form; and it was cruel how envy and hatred of his fate and fortune took his life in such a strange way, yet will never take away his name through the ages. His funeral was held with full honors, and he was buried in the Cathedral Church, mourned deeply by all of Messina, in the year 1543.
Great, indeed, is the obligation owed by craftsmen to Polidoro, in that he enriched art with a great abundance of vestments, all different and most strange, and of varied ornaments, and gave grace and adornment to all his works, and likewise made figures of every sort, animals, buildings, grotesques, and landscapes, all so beautiful, that since his day whosoever has aimed at catholicity has imitated him. It is a marvellous thing and a fearsome to see from the example of this master the instability [Pg 185] of Fortune and what she can bring to pass, causing men to become excellent in some profession from whom something quite different might have been expected, to the no small vexation of those who have laboured in vain for many years at the same art. It is a marvellous thing, I repeat, to see those same men, after much travailing and striving, brought by that same Fortune to a miserable and most unhappy end at the very moment when they were hoping to enjoy the fruits of their labours; and that with calamities so monstrous and terrible, that pity herself takes to flight, art is outraged, and benefits are repaid with an extraordinary and incredible ingratitude. Wherefore, even as painting may rejoice in the fruitful life of Polidoro, so could he complain of Fortune, which at one time showed herself friendly to him, only to bring him afterwards, when it was least expected, to a dreadful death.
The debt that craftsmen owe to Polidoro is truly significant because he enriched art with a vast array of unique and unusual garments and various decorations, giving grace and embellishment to all his works. He created figures of all kinds—animals, buildings, grotesques, and landscapes—that are so beautiful that since his time, anyone striving for excellence has sought to imitate him. It's astonishing and frightening to see, from this master's example, the fickleness of Fortune and what it can bring about, turning ordinary people into skilled professionals when they were least expected to be, much to the frustration of those who have toiled for years in the same craft without success. It is indeed remarkable to witness those same individuals, after much hard work and effort, led by that very same Fortune to a pitiful and unfortunate end just as they hoped to reap the rewards of their labors; and with calamities so monstrous and dreadful that even pity turns away, art is insulted, and kindness is met with outrageous and unbelievable ingratitude. Therefore, while painting may celebrate the fruitful life of Polidoro, he could also lament Fortune, which once seemed favorable to him, only to lead him to a horrible death when it was least expected.
[Pg 187] IL ROSSO
[Pg 189] LIFE OF IL ROSSO
PAINTER OF FLORENCE
Men of account who apply themselves to the arts and pursue them with all their powers are sometimes exalted and honoured beyond measure, at a moment when it was least expected, before the eyes of all the world, as may be seen clearly from the labours that Il Rosso, a painter of Florence, devoted to the art of painting; for if these were not acknowledged in Rome and Florence by those who could reward them, yet in France he found one to recompense him for them, and that in such sort, that his glory might have sufficed to quench the thirst of the most overweening ambition that could possess the heart of any craftsman, be he who he may. Nor could he have obtained in this life greater dignities, honour, or rank, seeing that he was regarded with favour and much esteemed beyond any other man of his profession by a King so great as is the King of France. And, indeed, his merits were such, that, if Fortune had secured less for him, she would have done him a very great wrong, for the reason that Rosso, in addition to his painting, was endowed with a most beautiful presence; his manner of speech was gracious and grave; he was an excellent musician, and had a fine knowledge of philosophy; and what was of greater import than all his other splendid qualities was this, that he always showed the invention of a poet in the grouping of his figures, besides being bold and well-grounded in draughtsmanship, graceful in manner, sublime in the highest flights of imagination, and a master of beautiful composition of scenes. In architecture he showed an extraordinary excellence; and he was always, however poor in circumstances, rich in the grandeur of his spirit. For this reason, whosoever shall follow in the labours of painting the walk pursued by Rosso, must [Pg 190] be celebrated without ceasing, as are that master's works, which have no equals in boldness and are executed without effort and strain, since he kept them free of that dry and painful elaboration to which so many subject themselves in order to veil the worthlessness of their works with the cloak of importance.
Men of significance who dedicate themselves to the arts and pursue them with all their strength are sometimes elevated and honored beyond measure, often unexpectedly, in front of the whole world, as is clearly shown by the efforts of Il Rosso, a painter from Florence. Even though his work wasn't recognized in Rome and Florence by those who could reward him, he found recognition in France, which was enough to satisfy even the most ambitious craftsman. He couldn't have achieved greater dignity, honor, or status in life, as he was highly favored and esteemed by a King as great as the King of France. Indeed, his talents were such that if Fortune had given him any less, it would have been a great injustice. Besides his painting, Rosso was strikingly handsome, spoke with grace and seriousness, was an excellent musician, and had a good understanding of philosophy. Most importantly, he always demonstrated the creativity of a poet in arranging his figures. He was bold and skilled in drawing, graceful in style, imaginative, and a master of beautiful scene composition. In architecture, he showed remarkable excellence, and even when poor financially, he was rich in spirit. Therefore, anyone who follows the artistic path of Rosso in painting will undoubtedly be celebrated, just like his works, which stand out in their boldness and were created effortlessly, as he avoided the dry and painful elaboration many artists use to disguise the inadequacy of their work with a façade of importance.
In his youth, Rosso drew from the cartoon of Michelagnolo, and would study art with but few masters, having a certain opinion of his own that conflicted with their manners; as may be seen from a shrine executed in fresco for Piero Bartoli at Marignolle, without the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini in Florence, containing a Dead Christ, wherein he began to show how great was his desire for a manner bold and grand, graceful and marvellous beyond that of all others. While still a beardless boy, at the time when Lorenzo Pucci was made a Cardinal by Pope Leo, he executed over the door of S. Sebastiano de' Servi the arms of the Pucci, with two figures, which made the craftsmen of that day marvel, for no one expected for him such a result as he achieved. Wherefore he so grew in courage, that, after having painted a picture with a half-length figure of Our Lady and a head of S. John the Evangelist for Maestro Jacopo, a Servite friar, who was something of a poet, at his persuasion he painted the Assumption of the Madonna in the cloister of the Servites, beside the scene of the Visitation, which was executed by Jacopo da Pontormo. In this he made a Heaven full of angels, all in the form of little naked children dancing in a circle round the Madonna, foreshortened with a most beautiful flow of outlines and with great grace of manner, as they wheel through the sky: insomuch that, if the colouring had been executed by him with that mature mastery of art which he afterwards came to achieve, he would have surpassed the other scenes by a great measure, even as he actually did equal them in grandeur and excellence of design. He made the Apostles much burdened with draperies, and, indeed, overloaded with their abundance; but the attitudes and some of the heads are more than beautiful.
In his youth, Rosso was inspired by Michelangelo’s cartoons and studied art under just a few masters, holding opinions that often clashed with their styles. This is evident in a fresco he created for Piero Bartoli at Marignolle, near the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini in Florence, featuring a Dead Christ. Here, he began to express his strong desire for a bold and grand style, graceful and extraordinary, surpassing others. As a young boy, when Lorenzo Pucci was made a Cardinal by Pope Leo, he painted the Pucci coat of arms over the door of S. Sebastiano de' Servi, accompanied by two figures that amazed the craftsmen of the time, who didn’t expect him to achieve such a result. His confidence grew, and after creating a half-length figure of Our Lady and a head of S. John the Evangelist for Maestro Jacopo, a poetical Servite friar, he was persuaded to paint the Assumption of the Madonna in the Servites' cloister, next to Jacopo da Pontormo's Visitation. In this work, he depicted a Heaven filled with angels, all little naked children dancing in a circle around the Madonna, beautifully foreshortened with graceful outlines as they moved through the sky. If his coloring had matched the mature mastery he later developed, it would have greatly surpassed the other scenes; however, he managed to equal them in grandeur and design excellence. He portrayed the Apostles with heavy draperies, almost overburdened by their abundance, yet their poses and some of the faces are more than beautiful.

MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Il Rosso.
Florence: Uffizi, 47)
Alinari
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD, WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Il Rosso.
Florence: Uffizi, 47)
Alinari
View larger image
The Director of the Hospital of S. Maria Nuova commissioned him to paint a panel: but when he saw it sketched, having little knowledge [Pg 191] of that art, the Saints appeared to him like devils; for it was Rosso's custom in his oil-sketches to give a sort of savage and desperate air to the faces, after which, in finishing them, he would sweeten the expressions and bring them to a proper form. At this the patron fled from his house and would not have the picture, saying that the painter had cheated him.
The Director of the Hospital of S. Maria Nuova asked him to paint a panel: but when he saw the sketch, not knowing much about that art, the Saints looked like devils to him; this was because Rosso typically gave his oil sketches a wild and desperate look to the faces, which he later softened and refined while finishing them. This made the patron leave his house and refuse to accept the painting, claiming that the artist had deceived him.
In like manner, over another door that leads into the cloister of the Convent of the Servites, Rosso painted the escutcheon of Pope Leo, with two children; but it is now ruined. And in the houses of citizens may be seen several of his pictures and many portraits. For the visit of Pope Leo to Florence he executed a very beautiful arch on the Canto de' Bischeri. Afterwards he painted a most beautiful picture of the Dead Christ for Signor di Piombino, and also decorated a little chapel for him. At Volterra, likewise, he painted a most lovely Deposition from the Cross.
In the same way, above another door leading into the cloister of the Convent of the Servites, Rosso painted the coat of arms of Pope Leo, along with two children; but it is now damaged. In the homes of local citizens, you can see several of his paintings and many portraits. For Pope Leo's visit to Florence, he created a beautiful arch on the Canto de' Bischeri. Later, he painted a stunning picture of the Dead Christ for Signor di Piombino and also decorated a small chapel for him. In Volterra, he painted a lovely Deposition from the Cross as well.
Having therefore grown in credit and fame, he executed for S. Spirito, in Florence, the panel-picture of the Dei family, which they had formerly entrusted to Raffaello da Urbino, who abandoned it because of the cares of the work that he had undertaken in Rome. This picture Rosso painted with marvellous grace, draughtsmanship, and vivacity of colouring. Let no one imagine that any work can display greater force or show more beautifully from a distance than this one, which, on account of the boldness of the figures and the extravagance of the attitudes, no longer employed by any of the other painters, was held to be an extraordinary work. And although it did not bring him much credit at that time, the world has since come little by little to recognize its excellence and has given it abundant praise; for with regard to the blending of colour it would be impossible to excel it, seeing that the lights which are in the brightest parts unite with the lower lights little by little as they merge into the darks, with such sweetness and harmony, and with such masterly skill in the projection of the shadows, that the figures stand out from one another and bring each other into relief by means of the lights and shades. Such vigour, indeed, has this work, that it may be said to have been conceived and executed with more judgment and mastery than [Pg 192] any that has ever been painted by any other master, however superior his judgment.
Having grown in reputation and fame, he created for S. Spirito in Florence the panel painting for the Dei family, which they had previously assigned to Raffaello da Urbino, who abandoned it due to the demands of his work in Rome. Rosso painted this piece with remarkable grace, skill, and vivid colors. No one should think any work shows more impact or looks more beautiful from a distance than this one, which, because of the bold poses and dramatic attitudes not used by other painters, was considered an extraordinary piece. Although it didn't earn him much recognition at the time, the world has gradually come to appreciate its quality and has praised it highly; regarding the blending of colors, it would be impossible to surpass it, as the brightest highlights gradually blend into the mid-tones and merge into the darker areas with such sweetness and harmony, expertly creating shadows that make the figures stand out from each other and come to life through light and shade. This work has such energy that it could be said to have been conceived and executed with more skill and expertise than [Pg 192] anything ever painted by any other master, no matter how superior his judgment.
For S. Lorenzo, at the commission of Carlo Ginori, he painted a panel-picture of the Marriage of Our Lady, which is held to be a most beautiful work. And, in truth, with regard to his facility of method, there has never been anyone who has been able to surpass him in masterly skill and dexterity, or even to approach within any distance of him; and he was so sweet in colouring, and varied his draperies with such grace, and took such delight in his art, that he was always held to be marvellous and worthy of the highest praise. Whosoever shall observe this work must recognize that all that I have written is most true, above all as he studies the nudes, which are very well conceived, with all the requirements of anatomy. His women are full of grace, and the draperies that adorn them fanciful and bizarre. He showed, also, the sense of fitness that is necessary in the heads of the old, with their harshness of features, and in those of women and children, with expressions sweet and pleasing. He was so rich in invention, that he never had any space left over in his pictures, and he executed all his work with such facility and grace, that it was a marvel.
For S. Lorenzo, commissioned by Carlo Ginori, he painted a panel of the Marriage of Our Lady, which is considered a stunning piece. In fact, no one has ever surpassed him in skill and dexterity, or even come close. He had a delightful way with color, varied his draperies gracefully, and clearly enjoyed his craft, earning him admiration and high praise. Anyone who looks at this work must agree that everything I’ve said is true, especially when observing the nudes, which are well-conceived with a solid understanding of anatomy. His women exude grace, and the draperies that adorn them are imaginative and unique. He also captured the necessary intensity in the faces of older individuals, with their severe features, and in the expressions of women and children, which are sweet and pleasing. His creativity was so abundant that he never left any empty spaces in his paintings, and he executed all his work with such ease and charm that it was truly remarkable.
For Giovanni Bandini, also, he painted a picture with some very beautiful nudes, representing the scene of Moses slaying the Egyptian, wherein were things worthy of the highest praise; and this was sent, I believe, into France. And for Giovanni Cavalcanti, likewise, he executed another, which went to England, of Jacob receiving water from the women at the well; this was held to be a divine work, seeing that it contained nudes and women wrought with supreme grace. For women, indeed, he always delighted to paint transparent pieces of drapery, head-dresses with intertwined tresses, and ornaments for their persons.
For Giovanni Bandini, he also painted a stunning piece featuring beautiful nudes, depicting the scene of Moses killing the Egyptian, which included elements worthy of the highest praise; I believe this was sent to France. He also created another painting for Giovanni Cavalcanti, which went to England, showing Jacob receiving water from the women at the well; this was regarded as a divine work, as it showcased nudes and women crafted with incredible grace. He always enjoyed painting women in sheer drapery, with headpieces adorned with flowing hair, and decorative accessories.
While Rosso was engaged on this work, he was living in the Borgo de' Tintori, the rooms of which look out on the gardens of the Friars of S. Croce; and he took much pleasure in a great ape, which had the intelligence rather of a man than of a beast. For this reason he held it very dear, and loved it like his own self; and since it had a marvellous understanding, he made use of it for many kinds of service. It happened that [Pg 193] this beast took a fancy to one of his assistants, by name Battistino, who was a young man of great beauty; and from the signs that his Battistino made to him he understood all that he wished to say. Now against the wall of the rooms at the back, which looked out upon the garden of the friars, was a pergola belonging to the Guardian, loaded with great Sancolombane grapes; and the young men used to let the ape down with a rope to the pergola, which was some distance from their window, and pull the beast up again with his hands full of grapes. The Guardian, finding his pergola stripped, but not knowing the culprit, suspected that it must be mice, and lay in hiding; and seeing Rosso's ape descending, he flew into a rage, seized a long pole, and rushed at him with hands uplifted in order to beat him. The ape, seeing that whether he went up or stayed where he was, the Guardian could reach him, began to spring about and destroy the pergola, and then, making as though to throw himself on the friar's back, seized with both his hands the outermost crossbeams which enclosed the pergola. Meanwhile the friar made play with his pole, and the ape, in his terror, shook the pergola to such purpose, and with such force, that he tore the stakes and rods out of their places, so that both pergola and ape fell headlong on the back of the friar, who shrieked for mercy. The rope was pulled up by Battistino and the others, who brought the ape back into the room safe and sound. Thereupon the Guardian, drawing off and planting himself on a terrace that he had there, said things not to be found in the Mass; and full of anger and resentment he went to the Council of Eight, a tribunal much feared in Florence. There he laid his complaint; and, Rosso having been summoned, the ape was condemned in jest to carry a weight fastened to his tail, to prevent him from jumping on pergole, as he did before. And so Rosso made a wooden cylinder swinging on a chain, and kept it on the ape, in such a way that he could go about the house but no longer jump about over other people's property. The ape, seeing himself condemned to such a punishment, seemed to guess that the friar was responsible. Every day, therefore, he exercised himself in hopping step by step with his legs, holding the weight with his hands; and thus, resting often, he succeeded in his design. For, being one day loose [Pg 194] about the house, he hopped step by step from roof to roof, during the hour when the Guardian was away chanting Vespers, and came to the roof over his chamber. There, letting go the weight, he kept up for half an hour such a lovely dance, that not a single tile of any kind remained unbroken. Then he went back home; and within three days, when rain came, were heard the Guardian's lamentations.
While Rosso was working on this project, he lived in the Borgo de' Tintori, where his rooms overlooked the gardens of the Friars of S. Croce. He enjoyed the company of a great ape that was more intelligent than most animals, and he cherished it like family. The ape had a remarkable understanding, so he used it for various tasks. One day, this ape took a liking to one of his assistants named Battistino, a handsome young man who could communicate with it through gestures. Behind their rooms, there was a pergola belonging to the Guardian, filled with large Sancolombane grapes. The young men would lower the ape down with a rope to reach the pergola, which was quite a distance from their window, and then pull it back up with its hands full of grapes. When the Guardian noticed that his pergola was being stripped of grapes, but didn’t know who the culprit was, he suspected mice and decided to lie in wait. When he saw Rosso's ape coming down, he became furious, grabbed a long pole, and ran at it, ready to hit it. The ape realized it was in danger, whether it went up or down, so it started jumping around and destroying the pergola. It pretended to leap onto the friar’s back and grabbed the outermost crossbeams that surrounded the pergola. Meanwhile, the friar swung his pole, and in its panic, the ape shook the pergola with such force that it pulled the stakes and supports out of place, causing both the pergola and the ape to fall onto the friar, who screamed for mercy. Battistino and the others pulled the ape back up into the room unharmed. Then the Guardian, retreating to a terrace he had there, uttered some angry words that certainly weren’t part of the Mass. Out of frustration, he went to the feared Council of Eight in Florence to file a complaint. After Rosso was summoned, the ape was humorously sentenced to carry a weight tied to its tail to prevent it from jumping onto other people's pergolas again. So, Rosso made a wooden cylinder attached to a chain and fitted it to the ape, allowing it to move around the house but not jump over to others’ property. Realizing it had been punished, the ape seemed to sense that the friar was to blame. Every day, it practiced hopping step by step while holding the weight with its hands. Eventually, while unsupervised in the house, it managed to hop from roof to roof during the hour the Guardian was away for Vespers, arriving at the roof above the Guardian's chamber. There, it dropped the weight and danced so vigorously for half an hour that it broke every single roof tile. Afterward, it went back home, and within three days, when the rain came, the Guardian could be heard lamenting his misfortune.
Rosso, having finished his works, took the road to Rome with Battistino and the ape; in which city his works were sought for with extraordinary eagerness, great expectations having been awakened about them by the sight of some drawings executed by him, which were held to be marvellous, for Rosso drew divinely well and with the highest finish. There, in the Pace, over the pictures of Raffaello, he executed a work which is the worst that he ever painted in all his days. Nor can I imagine how this came to pass, save from a reason which has been seen not only in his case, but also in that of many others, and which appears to be an extraordinary thing, and one of the secrets of nature; and it is this, that he who changes his country or place of habitation seems to change his nature, talents, character, and personal habits, insomuch that sometimes he seems to be not the same man but another, and all dazed and stupefied. This may have happened to Rosso in the air of Rome, and on account of the stupendous works of architecture and sculpture that he saw there, and the paintings and statues of Michelagnolo, which may have thrown him off his balance; which works also drove Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco and Andrea del Sarto to flight, and prevented them from executing anything in Rome. Certain it is, be the cause what it may, that Rosso never did worse; and, what is more, this work has to bear comparison with those of Raffaello da Urbino.
Rosso, after finishing his projects, headed to Rome with Battistino and the monkey. In that city, people eagerly sought his work, sparked by the extraordinary drawings he had created, which were regarded as amazing because Rosso had an incredible talent for drawing with exceptional detail. There, in the Pace, he created a piece that turned out to be the worst he ever painted. I can’t explain how this happened, except for a reason that has been observed not only in his situation but also in many others, which seems remarkable and one of the mysteries of nature: when someone changes their country or home, they often seem to change their nature, talents, personality, and habits to the point that they can appear to be completely different, disoriented, and stunned. This might have been the case for Rosso in the atmosphere of Rome, influenced by the awe-inspiring architecture and sculpture he encountered there, along with Michelangelo’s paintings and statues, which may have thrown him off his game; these works also sent Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco and Andrea del Sarto into retreat and stopped them from creating anything in Rome. Whatever the reason, it’s clear that Rosso never performed worse; furthermore, this work must be compared to those of Raphael of Urbino.
At this time he painted for Bishop Tornabuoni, who was his friend, a picture of a Dead Christ supported by two angels, which was a most beautiful piece of work, and is now in the possession of the heirs of Monsignor della Casa. For Baviera he made drawings of all the Gods, for copper-plates, which were afterwards engraved by Jacopo Caraglio; one of them being Saturn changing himself into a horse, and the most noteworthy that of Pluto carrying off Proserpine. He executed a sketch for [Pg 195] the Beheading of S. John the Baptist, which is now in a little church on the Piazza de' Salviati in Rome.
At this time, he painted a picture for his friend Bishop Tornabuoni, depicting a Dead Christ supported by two angels. It was a stunning piece of art and is now owned by the heirs of Monsignor della Casa. For Baviera, he created drawings of all the Gods for copper plates, which were later engraved by Jacopo Caraglio; one of them shows Saturn transforming into a horse, and the most notable one is of Pluto abducting Proserpine. He also made a sketch for [Pg 195] of the Beheading of S. John the Baptist, which is now in a small church in the Piazza de' Salviati in Rome.
Meanwhile the sack of the city took place, and poor Rosso was taken prisoner by the Germans and used very ill, for, besides stripping him of his clothes, they made him carry weights on his back barefooted and with nothing on his head, and remove almost the whole stock from a cheesemonger's shop. Thus ill-treated by them, he escaped with difficulty to Perugia, where he was warmly welcomed and reclothed by the painter Domenico di Paris, for whom he drew the cartoon for a panel-picture of the Magi, a very beautiful work, which is to be seen in the house of Domenico. But he did not stay long in that place, for, hearing that Bishop Tornabuoni, who was very much his friend, and had also fled from the sack, had gone to Borgo a San Sepolcro, he made his way thither.
Meanwhile, the city was being looted, and poor Rosso was captured by the Germans and treated very poorly. They not only stripped him of his clothes, but also made him carry heavy loads on his back while barefoot and without anything on his head, forcing him to clear out almost the entire stock from a cheesemonger's shop. After being mistreated by them, he managed to escape to Perugia, where he was warmly welcomed and given new clothes by the painter Domenico di Paris. For Domenico, he created the sketch for a panel painting of the Magi, a beautiful piece that can be seen in Domenico's house. However, he didn’t stay there for long; upon hearing that Bishop Tornabuoni, a good friend of his who had also fled from the sack, was in Borgo a San Sepolcro, he decided to go there.
There was living at that time in Borgo a San Sepolcro a pupil of Giulio Romano, the painter Raffaello dal Colle; and this master, having undertaken for a small price to paint a panel for S. Croce, the seat of a Company of Flagellants, in his native city, lovingly resigned the commission and gave it to Rosso, to the end that he might leave some example of his handiwork in that place. At this the Company showed resentment, but the Bishop gave him every facility; and when the picture, which brought him credit, was finished, it was set up in S. Croce. The Deposition from the Cross that it contains is something very rare and beautiful, because he rendered in the colours a certain effect of darkness to signify the eclipse that took place at Christ's death, and because it was executed with very great diligence.
At that time in Borgo a San Sepolcro, there was a student of Giulio Romano named Raffaello dal Colle. This artist, who had taken on a project to paint a panel for S. Croce, where a group of Flagellants met in his hometown, decided to give up the commission and hand it over to Rosso so that he could leave a piece of his work in that place. The group was upset about this, but the Bishop supported him fully. When the painting, which brought him praise, was completed, it was displayed in S. Croce. The piece features the Deposition from the Cross, which is particularly rare and beautiful because he used colors to create a sense of darkness, signifying the eclipse that occurred at Christ's death, and it was done with great care.
Afterwards, at Città di Castello, he received the commission for a panel-picture, on which he was about to set to work, when, as it was being primed with gesso, a roof fell upon it and broke it to pieces; while upon him there came a fever so violent, that he was like to die of it, on which account he had himself carried from Castello to Borgo a San Sepolcro. This malady being followed by a quartan fever, he then went on to the Pieve a San Stefano for a change of air, and finally to Arezzo, where he was entertained in the house of Benedetto Spadari, who so [Pg 196] went to work with the help of Giovanni Antonio Lappoli of Arezzo and the many friends and relatives that they had, that Rosso was commissioned to paint in fresco a vault previously allotted to the painter Niccolò Soggi, in the Madonna delle Lagrime. And so eager were they that he should leave such a memorial of himself in that city, that he was given a payment of three hundred crowns of gold. Whereupon Rosso began his cartoons in a room that they had allotted to him in a place called Murello; and there he finished four of them. In one he depicted our First Parents, bound to the Tree of the Fall, with Our Lady drawing from their mouths the Sin in the form of the Apple, and beneath her feet the Serpent; and in the air—wishing to signify that she was clothed with the sun and moon—he made nude figures of Phœbus and Diana. In the second is Moses bearing the Ark of the Covenant, represented by Our Lady surrounded by five Virtues. In another is the Throne of Solomon, also represented by the Madonna, to whom votive offerings are being brought, to signify those who have recourse to her for benefits: together with other bizarre fancies, which were conceived by the fruitful brain of M. Giovanni Pollastra, the friend of Rosso and a Canon of Arezzo, in compliment to whom Rosso made a most beautiful model of the whole work, which is now in my house at Arezzo. He also drew for that work a study of nude figures, which is a very choice thing; and it is a pity that it was never finished, for, if he had put it into execution and painted it in oils, instead of having to do it in fresco, it would indeed have been a miracle. But he was ever averse to working in fresco, and therefore went on delaying the execution of the cartoons, meaning to have the work carried out by Raffaello dal Borgo and others, so that in the end it was never done.
Afterwards, in Città di Castello, he was given the task to create a panel painting, which he was about to start working on when, while it was being primed with gesso, a roof collapsed on it and shattered it. He then fell ill with such a severe fever that it almost killed him, prompting him to be transported from Castello to Borgo a San Sepolcro. This sickness was followed by a quartan fever, so he decided to go to Pieve a San Stefano for some fresh air, and eventually to Arezzo, where he was welcomed in the home of Benedetto Spadari. They were so eager for him to leave a lasting impression in the city that he was offered a payment of three hundred gold crowns to paint a fresco on a vault that had originally been assigned to the painter Niccolò Soggi, in the Madonna delle Lagrime. His friends, including Giovanni Antonio Lappoli of Arezzo, helped him with this project, and Rosso began working on his sketches in a room they had set aside for him in a place called Murello, where he completed four of them. In one, he depicted our First Parents bound to the Tree of the Fall, with Our Lady drawing the Sin in the form of an Apple from their mouths, and beneath her feet, the Serpent. To signify that she was clothed with the sun and moon, he included nude figures of Phœbus and Diana in the air. The second sketch showed Moses carrying the Ark of the Covenant, represented by Our Lady surrounded by five Virtues. In another, there was the Throne of Solomon, again represented by the Madonna, who was receiving votive offerings, symbolizing those who seek her help. Along with these, there were other imaginative ideas conceived by M. Giovanni Pollastra, a friend of Rosso and a Canon of Arezzo. In honor of him, Rosso created a beautiful model of the entire work, which is now in my home in Arezzo. He also produced sketches of nude figures for the project, which were exceptional, and it’s a shame that they were never completed. If he had carried it out and painted it in oils instead of fresco, it would have truly been a masterpiece. However, he always disliked working in fresco and kept postponing the execution of the sketches, planning to have the work completed by Raffaello dal Borgo and others, so in the end, it was never done.
At that same time, being a courteous person, he made many designs for pictures and buildings in Arezzo and its neighbourhood; among others, one for the Rectors of the Fraternity, of the chapel which is at the foot of the Piazza, wherein there is now the Volto Santo. For the same patrons he drew the design for a panel-picture to be painted by his hand, containing a Madonna with a multitude under her cloak, which was to be set up in the same place; and this design, which was not put [Pg 197] into execution, is in our book, together with many other most beautiful drawings by the hand of the same master.
At that time, being a polite person, he created many designs for paintings and buildings in Arezzo and the surrounding area. Among them was a design for the Rectors of the Fraternity for the chapel located at the foot of the Piazza, where the Volto Santo is now found. For the same patrons, he also created a design for a panel painting that he would execute himself, featuring a Madonna with a crowd tucked under her cloak, which was intended to be placed in the same location. Although this design was never completed, it is included in our book, alongside many other stunning drawings by the same master.
But to return to the work that he was to execute in the Madonna delle Lagrime: there came forward as his security for this work Giovanni Antonio Lappoli of Arezzo, his most faithful friend, who gave him proofs of loving kindness with every sort of service. But in the year 1530, when Florence was being besieged, the Aretines, having been restored to liberty by the small judgment of Papo Altoviti, attacked the citadel and razed it to the ground. And because that people looked with little favour on Florentines, Rosso would not trust himself to them, and went off to Borgo a San Sepolcro, leaving the cartoons and designs for his work hidden away in the citadel.
But to get back to the work he was supposed to do at the Madonna delle Lagrime: his most loyal friend, Giovanni Antonio Lappoli from Arezzo, stepped up to vouch for him and showed his friendship through all kinds of support. However, in 1530, when Florence was under siege, the people of Arezzo, having regained their freedom with the minor ruling of Papo Altoviti, attacked the citadel and destroyed it completely. Since the Aretines didn’t have a high opinion of the Florentines, Rosso didn’t feel safe among them and went to Borgo a San Sepolcro, leaving the sketches and plans for his work hidden in the citadel.
Now those who had given him the commission for the panel at Castello, wished him to finish it; but he, on account of the illness that he had suffered at Castello, would not return to that city. He finished their panel, therefore, at Borgo a San Sepolcro; nor would he ever give them the pleasure of a glance at it. In it he depicted a multitude, with Christ in the sky being adored by four figures, and he painted Moors, Gypsies, and the strangest things in the world; but, with the exception of the figures, which are perfect in their excellence, the composition is concerned with anything rather than the wishes of those who ordered the picture of him. At the same time that he was engaged on that work, he disinterred dead bodies in the Vescovado, where he was living, and made a most beautiful anatomical model. Rosso was, in truth, an ardent student of all things relating to art, and few days passed without his drawing some nude from life.
Now those who had commissioned him for the panel at Castello wanted him to finish it; however, he, due to the illness he had experienced in Castello, refused to return to that city. He completed their panel instead at Borgo a San Sepolcro; nor would he ever give them the satisfaction of seeing it. In it, he portrayed a crowd, with Christ in the sky being worshipped by four figures, and he painted Moors, Gypsies, and the most unusual things imaginable; yet, aside from the figures, which are remarkably well done, the composition has little to do with the expectations of those who ordered the piece from him. While working on that, he also exhumed bodies in the Vescovado, where he was living, and created an exceptionally beautiful anatomical model. Rosso was truly passionate about everything related to art, and hardly a day went by without him drawing a nude from life.
He had always had the idea of finishing his life in France, and of thus delivering himself from that misery and poverty which are the lot of men who work in Tuscany, or in the country where they were born; and he resolved to depart. And with a view to appearing more competent in all matters, and to being ignorant of none, he had just learned the Latin tongue; when there came upon him a reason for further hastening his departure. For one Holy Thursday, on which day matins are chanted in the evening, one of his disciples, a young Aretine, being in church, [Pg 198] made a blaze of sparks and flames with a lighted candle-end and some resin, at the moment when the "darkness," as they call it, was in progress; and the boy was reproved by some priests, and even struck. Seeing this, Rosso, who had the boy seated at his side, sprang up full of anger against the priests. Thereupon an uproar began, without anyone knowing what it was all about, and swords were drawn against poor Rosso, who was busy with the priests. Taking to flight, therefore, he contrived to regain his own rooms without having been struck or overtaken by anyone. But he held himself to have been affronted; and having finished the panel for Castello, without troubling about his work at Arezzo or the wrong that he was doing to Giovanni Antonio, his security (for he had received more than a hundred and fifty crowns), he set off by night. Taking the road by Pesaro, he made his way to Venice, where, being entertained by Messer Pietro Aretino, he made for him a drawing, which was afterwards engraved, of Mars sleeping with Venus, with the Loves and Graces despoiling him and carrying off his cuirass. Departing from Venice, he found his way into France, where he was received by the Florentine colony with much affection. There he painted some pictures, which were afterwards placed in the Gallery at Fontainebleau; and these he then presented to King Francis, who took infinite pleasure in them, but much more in the presence, speech, and manner of Rosso, who was imposing in person, with red hair in accordance with his name, and serious, deliberate, and most judicious in his every action. The King, then, after straightway granting him an allowance of four hundred crowns, and giving him a house in Paris, which he occupied but seldom, because he lived most of the time at Fontainebleau, where he had rooms and lived like a nobleman, appointed him superintendent over all the buildings, pictures, and other ornaments of that place.
He had always envisioned ending his life in France, freeing himself from the misery and poverty that come with working in Tuscany or in his native land; and he decided to leave. In order to appear more skilled in everything and not miss anything, he had just learned Latin when he had an urgent reason to expedite his departure. One Holy Thursday, when evening matins were being sung, one of his disciples, a young man from Arezzo, caused a shower of sparks and flames with a lit candle stub and some resin at the moment when the "darkness," as they call it, was in effect; and the boy was scolded by some priests and even struck. Seeing this, Rosso, who had the boy next to him, jumped up in anger at the priests. An uproar began, confusing everyone involved, and swords were drawn against poor Rosso, who was tangled up with the priests. Therefore, he fled, managing to get back to his own rooms without being struck or caught by anyone. However, he felt insulted; and after completing the panel for Castello, disregarding his work at Arezzo and the wrong he was doing to Giovanni Antonio, his patron (as he had received over a hundred and fifty crowns), he set off by night. Taking the route through Pesaro, he made his way to Venice, where he was hosted by Messer Pietro Aretino, for whom he created a drawing that was later engraved, depicting Mars sleeping with Venus, while the Loves and Graces stripped him and carried off his armor. After leaving Venice, he traveled to France, where he was warmly welcomed by the Florentine community. There, he painted several pieces that were later displayed in the Gallery at Fontainebleau; he then presented these to King Francis, who greatly enjoyed them but was even more taken with Rosso’s presence, speech, and demeanor. Rosso was striking in appearance, with red hair fitting his name, and he was serious, deliberate, and very thoughtful in all his actions. The King promptly granted him a stipend of four hundred crowns and provided him with a house in Paris, which he rarely occupied because he spent most of his time at Fontainebleau, where he had rooms and lived like a nobleman. He was appointed superintendent over all the buildings, artwork, and other decorations of that place.

THE TRANSFIGURATION
(After the panel by Il Rosso.
Città da Castello: Duomo)
Alinari
View larger image
THE TRANSFIGURATION
(After the painting by Il Rosso.
Città da Castello: Duomo)
Alinari
View larger image
There, in the first place, Rosso made a beginning with a gallery over the lower court, which he completed not with a vault, but with a ceiling, or rather, soffit, of woodwork, partitioned most beautifully into compartments. The side-walls he decorated all over with stucco-work, fantastic and bizarre in its distribution, and with carved cornices of many kinds; and on the piers were lifesize figures. Everything below [Pg 199] the cornices, between one pier and another, he adorned with festoons of stucco, vastly rich, and others painted, and all composed of most beautiful fruits and every sort of foliage. And then, in a large space, he caused to be painted after his own designs, if what I have heard is true, about twenty-four scenes in fresco, representing, I believe, the deeds of Alexander the Great; for which, as I have said, he made all the designs, executing them in chiaroscuro with water-colours. At the two ends of this gallery are two panel-pictures in oils by his hand, designed and painted with such perfection, that there is little better to be seen in the art of painting. In one of these are a Bacchus and a Venus, executed with marvellous art and judgment. The Bacchus is a naked boy, so tender, soft, and delicate, that he seems to be truly of flesh, yielding to the touch, and rather alive than painted; and about him are some vases painted in imitation of gold, silver, crystal, and various precious stones, so fantastic, and surrounded by devices so many and so bizarre, that whoever beholds this work, with its vast variety of invention, stands in amazement before it. Among other details, also, is a Satyr raising part of a pavilion, whose head, in its strange, goatlike aspect, is a marvel of beauty, and all the more because he seems to be smiling and full of joy at the sight of so beautiful a boy. There is also a little boy riding on a wonderful bear, with many other ornaments full of grace and beauty. In the other picture are Cupid and Venus, with other lovely figures; but the figure to which Rosso gave the greatest attention was the Cupid, whom he represented as a boy of twelve, although well grown, riper in features than is expected at that age, and most beautiful in every part.
There, first of all, Rosso started with a gallery above the lower court, which he finished not with a vault, but with a wooden ceiling, or rather, a soffit, beautifully divided into sections. He decorated the side walls extensively with stucco work, arranged in a fantastic and unusual manner, along with various carved cornices; and on the piers, he placed life-sized figures. Everything below [Pg 199] the cornices, between the piers, was adorned with rich stucco festoons and painted elements, all depicting beautiful fruits and various types of foliage. In a large area, he had around twenty-four fresco scenes painted based on his own designs, which I believe depicted the deeds of Alexander the Great; for which, as I’ve mentioned, he created all the designs, executing them in chiaroscuro with watercolors. At each end of this gallery, there are two oil panel paintings by his hand, crafted and painted with such perfection that there are very few works in painting that are better. One of these features Bacchus and Venus, rendered with astonishing skill and judgment. The Bacchus is a naked boy, so tender, soft, and delicate that he truly seems to be flesh and blood, responsive to touch, and more alive than painted; around him are vases painted to imitate gold, silver, crystal, and various precious stones, so imaginative and surrounded by numerous and bizarre motifs that anyone who sees this work, with its vast array of invention, stands amazed. Among other details, there is a Satyr lifting part of a pavilion, whose head, with its strange, goat-like appearance, is a marvel of beauty, all the more so because he appears to be smiling and delighted by the sight of such a beautiful boy. There’s also a little boy riding a magnificent bear, alongside many other ornaments that are graceful and lovely. In the other painting are Cupid and Venus, along with other charming figures; but the figure that Rosso focused on the most was Cupid, whom he depicted as a twelve-year-old boy, although quite mature, with more developed features than expected for that age, and exceedingly beautiful in every aspect.
The King, seeing these works, and liking them vastly, conceived an extraordinary affection for Rosso; wherefore no long time passed before he gave him a Canonicate in the Sainte Chapelle of the Madonna at Paris, with so many other revenues and benefits, that Rosso lived like a nobleman, with a goodly number of servants and horses, giving banquets and showing all manner of courtesies to all his friends and acquaintances, especially to the Italian strangers who arrived in those parts.
The King, impressed by these works and highly appreciating them, developed a deep fondness for Rosso. Not long after, he awarded him a Canonicate at the Sainte Chapelle of the Madonna in Paris, along with so many other resources and perks that Rosso lived like a nobleman, with a decent number of servants and horses, hosting feasts and extending all kinds of niceties to his friends and acquaintances, especially the Italian visitors who came to that area.
[Pg 200] After this, he executed another hall, which is called the Pavilion, because it is in the form of a Pavilion, being above the rooms on the first floor, and thus situated above any of the others. This apartment he decorated from the level of the floor to the roof with a great variety of beautiful ornaments in stucco, figures in the round distributed at equal intervals, and children, festoons, and various kinds of animals. In the compartments on the walls are seated figures in fresco, one in each; and such is their number, that there may be seen among them images of all the Heathen Gods and Goddesses of the ancients. Last of all, above the windows, is a frieze all adorned with stucco, and very rich, but without pictures.
[Pg 200] After this, he built another hall, which is called the Pavilion because it has the shape of a Pavilion, positioned above the rooms on the first floor, making it the highest of all the spaces. He decorated this room from the floor to the ceiling with a wide range of beautiful stucco ornaments, evenly spaced figures in the round, children, garlands, and various types of animals. On the walls, there are frescoed figures, one in each section; there are so many of them that you can see images of all the ancient pagan Gods and Goddesses. Finally, above the windows, there’s a richly adorned stucco frieze, but it has no pictures.
He then executed a vast number of works in many chambers, bathrooms, and other apartments, both in stucco and in painting, of some of which drawings may be seen, executed in engraving and published abroad, which are full of grace and beauty; as are also the numberless designs that Rosso made for salt-cellars, vases, bowls, and other things of fancy, all of which the King afterwards caused to be executed in silver; but these were so numerous that it would take too long to mention them all. Let it be enough to say that he made designs for all the vessels of a sideboard for the King, and for all the details of the trappings of horses, triumphal masquerades, and everything else that it is possible to imagine, showing in these such fantastic and bizarre conceptions, that no one could do better.
He then completed a large number of works in various rooms, bathrooms, and other spaces, both in plaster and in paint, some of which drawings can be seen, created through engraving and published overseas, showcasing grace and beauty. Likewise, the countless designs that Rosso made for saltcellars, vases, bowls, and other decorative items were later made in silver by the King. However, there were so many that it would take too long to mention them all. It’s enough to say that he created designs for all the sideboard vessels for the King, and for all the details of horse adornments, grand masquerades, and anything else imaginable, displaying such fantastic and bizarre ideas that no one could surpass him.
In the year 1540, when the Emperor Charles V went to France under the safeguard of King Francis, and visited Fontainebleau, having with him not more than twelve men, Rosso executed one half of the decorations that the King ordained in order to honour that great Emperor, and the other half was executed by Francesco Primaticcio of Bologna. The works that Rosso made, such as arches, colossal figures, and other things of that kind, were, so it was said at the time, the most astounding that had ever been made by any man up to that age. But a great part of the rooms finished by Rosso at the aforesaid Palace of Fontainebleau were destroyed after his death by the same Francesco Primaticcio, who has made a new and larger structure in the same place.
In 1540, when Emperor Charles V visited France with the protection of King Francis and toured Fontainebleau, he had no more than twelve men with him. Rosso created half of the decorations that the King commissioned to honor the great Emperor, while the other half was done by Francesco Primaticcio from Bologna. The works Rosso produced, including arches, colossal figures, and similar elements, were considered, at that time, the most impressive ever created by anyone up to that point. However, a significant portion of the rooms completed by Rosso at the Palace of Fontainebleau was destroyed after his death by Francesco Primaticcio, who built a new and larger structure in the same location.
[Pg 201] Among those who worked with Rosso on the aforesaid decorations in stucco and relief, and beloved by him beyond all the others, were the Florentine Lorenzo Naldino, Maestro Francesco of Orleans, Maestro Simone of Paris, Maestro Claudio, likewise a Parisian, Maestro Lorenzo of Picardy, and many others. But the best of them all was Domenico del Barbieri, who is an excellent painter and master of stucco, and a marvellous draughtsman, as is proved by his engraved works, which may be numbered among the best in common circulation. The painters, likewise, whom he employed in those works at Fontainebleau, were Luca Penni, brother of Giovan Francesco Penni, called Il Fattore, who was a disciple of Raffaello da Urbino; the Fleming Leonardo, a very able painter, who executed the designs of Rosso to perfection in colours; Bartolommeo Miniati, a Florentine; with Francesco Caccianimici, and Giovan Battista da Bagnacavallo. These last entered his service when Francesco Primaticcio went by order of the King to Rome, to make moulds of the Laocoon, the Apollo, and many other choice antiquities, for the purpose of casting them afterwards in bronze. I say nothing of the carvers, the master-joiners, and innumerable others of whom Rosso availed himself in those works, because there is no need to speak of them all, although many of them executed works worthy of much praise.
[Pg 201] Among those who worked with Rosso on the mentioned stucco and relief decorations, and whom he cherished more than anyone else, were the Florentine Lorenzo Naldino, Maestro Francesco from Orleans, Maestro Simone from Paris, Maestro Claudio, also from Paris, Maestro Lorenzo from Picardy, and many others. But the standout among them all was Domenico del Barbieri, who is an excellent painter, a master of stucco, and a fantastic draftsman, as demonstrated by his engravings, which rank among the best widely available. The painters he employed for those projects at Fontainebleau included Luca Penni, brother of Giovan Francesco Penni, known as Il Fattore, who was a student of Raffaello da Urbino; the Flemish artist Leonardo, a very skilled painter who executed Rosso's designs perfectly in color; Bartolommeo Miniati from Florence; along with Francesco Caccianimici and Giovan Battista from Bagnacavallo. These last individuals joined his team when Francesco Primaticcio was sent by the King to Rome to make molds of the Laocoon, the Apollo, and many other valuable antiques, with the aim of later casting them in bronze. I won’t mention the carvers, master-joiners, and countless others whom Rosso relied on for these projects, because it’s unnecessary to discuss them all, though many produced works deserving of great praise.
In addition to the things mentioned above, Rosso executed with his own hand a S. Michael, which is a rare work. For the Constable he painted a panel-picture of the Dead Christ, a choice thing, which is at a seat of that noble, called Ecouen; and he also executed some exquisite miniatures for the King. He then drew a book of anatomical studies, intending to have it printed in France; of which there are some sheets by his own hand in our book of drawings. Among his possessions, also, after he was dead, were found two very beautiful cartoons, in one of which is a Leda of singular beauty, and in the other the Tiburtine Sibyl showing to the Emperor Octavian the Glorious Virgin with the Infant Christ in her arms. In the latter he drew the King, the Queen, their Guard, and the people, with such a number of figures, and all so well drawn, that it may be said with truth that this was one of the most beautiful things that Rosso ever did.
In addition to the things mentioned above, Rosso created a painting of St. Michael with his own hand, which is quite rare. For the Constable, he painted a panel of the Dead Christ, a remarkable piece that can be found at the noble's estate in Ecouen; he also made some exquisite miniatures for the King. He then drew a book of anatomical studies, intending to have it published in France, and some sheets from it, done in his own hand, are included in our collection of drawings. Among his belongings, after he passed away, were two very beautiful sketches, one featuring an exceptionally lovely Leda and the other showing the Tiburtine Sibyl presenting the Glorious Virgin with the Infant Christ to Emperor Octavian. In the latter, he depicted the King, the Queen, their Guard, and the people, with so many figures, all so well drawn, that it can truly be said this was one of the most beautiful works Rosso ever created.
[Pg 202] By reason of these works and many others, of which nothing is known, he became so dear to the King, that a little before his death he found himself in possession of more than a thousand crowns of income, without counting the allowances for his work, which were enormous; insomuch that, living no longer as a painter, but rather as a prince, he kept a number of servants and horses to ride, and had his house filled with tapestries, silver, and other valuable articles of furniture. But Fortune, who never, or very seldom, maintains for long in high estate one who puts his trust too much in her, brought him headlong down in the strangest manner ever known. For while Francesco di Pellegrino, a Florentine, who delighted in painting and was very much his friend, was associating with him in the closest intimacy, Rosso was robbed of some hundreds of ducats; whereupon the latter, suspecting that no one but the same Francesco could have done this, had him arrested by the hands of justice, rigorously examined, and grievously tortured. But he, knowing himself innocent, and declaring nothing but the truth, was finally released; and, moved by just anger, he was forced to show his resentment against Rosso for the shameful charge that he had falsely laid upon him. Having therefore issued a writ for libel against him, he pressed him so closely, that Rosso, not being able to clear himself or make any defence, felt himself to be in a sorry plight, perceiving that he had not only accused his friend falsely, but had also stained his own honour; and to eat his words, or to adopt any other shameful method, would likewise proclaim him a false and worthless man. Resolving, therefore, to kill himself by his own hand rather than be punished by others, he took the following course. One day that the King happened to be at Fontainebleau, he sent a peasant to Paris for a certain most poisonous essence, pretending that he wished to use it for making colours or varnishes, but intending to poison himself, as he did. The peasant, then, returned with it; and such was the malignity of the poison, that, merely through holding his thumb over the mouth of the phial, carefully stopped as it was with wax, he came very near losing that member, which was consumed and almost eaten away by the deadly potency of the poison. And shortly afterwards it slew Rosso, although he was in [Pg 203] perfect health, he having drunk it to the end that it might take his life, as it did in a few hours.
[Pg 202] Because of his work and many other contributions, about which little is known, he became so valuable to the King that just before his death, he found himself earning over a thousand crowns, not including the substantial allowances for his work; so much so that he lived not just like a painter but more like a prince, keeping several servants and horses and filling his house with tapestries, silver, and other valuable furnishings. However, Fortune, who rarely keeps someone in high favor for long if they rely on her too much, caused him to fall from grace in the strangest way imaginable. While Francesco di Pellegrino, a Florentine who loved painting and was very close to him, was spending time with him, Rosso was robbed of several hundred ducats. Suspecting that only Francesco could be responsible, he had him arrested, rigorously questioned, and cruelly tortured. But Francesco, knowing he was innocent and only telling the truth, was ultimately released; and, justifiably angry, he felt compelled to retaliate against Rosso for the disgraceful accusation. Therefore, he filed a libel suit against him, pressing Rosso so hard that Rosso, unable to defend himself, found himself in a desperate situation. He realized he had not only wrongly accused his friend but also tarnished his own reputation, and either retracting his words or taking any other disgraceful route would mark him as a false and worthless man. So, deciding to end his own life rather than face punishment from others, he took the following action. One day when the King was at Fontainebleau, he sent a peasant to Paris for a highly toxic substance, pretending it was for making paints or varnishes, but intending to use it to poison himself, which he did. The peasant returned with it, and the poison was so potent that just covering the mouth of the vial with his thumb nearly cost him that finger, which was nearly consumed by the deadly venom. Shortly after, it killed Rosso, even though he was in perfect health, as he drank it fully intending to end his life, which it accomplished within a few hours. [Pg 203]
This news, being brought to the King, grieved him beyond measure, since it seemed to him that by the death of Rosso he had lost the most excellent craftsman of his day. However, to the end that the work might not suffer, he had it carried on by Francesco Primaticcio of Bologna, who, as has been related, had already done much work for him; giving him a good Abbey, even as he had presented a Canonicate to Rosso.
This news, when it reached the King, deeply saddened him because he felt he had lost the best craftsman of his time with Rosso's death. However, to ensure that the work wouldn't suffer, he had it continued by Francesco Primaticcio from Bologna, who, as mentioned earlier, had already completed a lot of work for him; he provided him with a good Abbey, just as he had given a Canonicate to Rosso.
Rosso died in the year 1541, leaving great regrets behind him among his friends and brother-craftsmen, who have learned by his example what benefits may accrue from a prince to one who is eminent in every field of art, and well-mannered and gentle in all his actions, as was that master, who for many reasons deserved, and still deserves, to be admired as one truly most excellent.
Rosso passed away in 1541, leaving behind deep regrets among his friends and fellow artists, who learned from his example the advantages a prince can provide to someone exceptional in every area of art, and who was kind and courteous in all his actions, just like that master, who for many reasons deserved, and continues to deserve, admiration as someone truly remarkable.
[Pg 205] BARTOLOMMEO DA BAGNACAVALLO AND OTHERS
[Pg 207] LIVES OF BARTOLOMMEO DA BAGNACAVALLO, AND OTHER PAINTERS OF ROMAGNA
It is certain that the result of emulation in the arts, caused by a desire for glory, proves for the most part to be one worthy of praise; but when it happens that the aspirant, through presumption and arrogance, comes to hold an inflated opinion of himself, in course of time the name for excellence that he seeks may be seen to dissolve into mist and smoke, for the reason that there is no advance to perfection possible for him who knows not his own failings and has no fear of the work of others. More readily does hope mount towards proficience for those modest and studious spirits who, leading an upright life, honour the works of rare masters and imitate them with all diligence, than for those who have their heads full of smoky pride, as had Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo, Amico of Bologna, Girolamo da Cotignola, and Innocenzio da Imola, painters all, who, living in Bologna at one and the same time, felt the greatest jealousy of one another that could possibly be imagined. And, what is more, their pride and vainglory, not being based on the foundation of ability, led them astray from the true path, which brings to immortality those who strive more from love of good work than from rivalry. This circumstance, then, was the reason that they did not crown the good beginnings that they had made with that final excellence which they expected; for their presuming to the name of masters turned them too far aside from the good way.
It's clear that the outcome of trying to emulate others in the arts, driven by a quest for fame, often results in something commendable. However, when someone's ambition leads them to become arrogant and overly confident, the pursuit of excellence they desire can eventually fade away, because it's impossible to reach perfection if one is blind to their own shortcomings and dismissive of others' efforts. Those who are humble and dedicated, living an honest life and respecting the works of great masters while diligently trying to imitate them, are more likely to progress than those filled with misguided pride, like Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo, Amico of Bologna, Girolamo da Cotignola, and Innocenzio da Imola. These painters, all living in Bologna at the same time, were consumed by jealousy toward each other. Moreover, their arrogance and vanity, lacking a solid foundation of true skill, led them away from the path that leads to greatness, which rewards those who are motivated by a love for quality work rather than competition. This was why they failed to build upon their promising starts to achieve the excellence they sought; their presumption of being masters led them too far off the right track.
Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo had come to Rome in the time of Raffaello, in order to attain with his works to that perfection which he believed himself to be already grasping with his intellect. And being a young man who had some fame at Bologna and had awakened [Pg 208] expectations, he was set to execute a work in the Church of the Pace at Rome, in the first chapel on the right hand as one enters the church, above the chapel of Baldassarre Peruzzi of Siena. But, thinking that he had not achieved the success that he had promised himself, he returned to Bologna. There he and the others mentioned above, in competition one with another, executed each a scene from the Lives of Christ and His Mother in the Chapel of the Madonna in S. Petronio, near the door of the façade, on the right hand as one enters the church; among which little difference in merit is to be seen between one and another. But Bartolommeo acquired from this work the reputation of having a manner both softer and stronger than the others; and although there is a vast number of strange things in the scene of Maestro Amico, in which he depicted the Resurrection of Christ with armed men in crouching and distorted attitudes, and many soldiers crushed flat by the stone of the Sepulchre, which has fallen upon them, nevertheless that of Bartolommeo, as having more unity of design and colouring, was more extolled by other craftsmen. On account of this Bartolommeo associated himself with Biagio Bolognese, a person with much more practice than excellence in art; and they executed in company at S. Salvatore, for the Frati Scopetini, a refectory which they painted partly in fresco and partly "a secco," containing the scene of Christ satisfying five thousand people with five loaves and two fishes. They painted, also, on a wall of the library, the Disputation of S. Augustine, wherein they made a passing good view in perspective. These masters, thanks to having seen the works of Raffaello and associated with him, had a certain quality which, upon the whole, gave promise of excellence, but in truth they did not attend as they should have done to the more subtle refinements of art. Yet, since there were no painters in Bologna at that time who knew more than they did, they were held by those who then governed the city, as well as by all the people, to be the best masters in Italy.
Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo arrived in Rome during Raffaello's time, hoping to reach the perfection that he believed he was close to achieving intellectually. As a young man with some recognition in Bologna and high expectations, he was tasked with creating a work in the Church of the Pace in Rome, specifically in the first chapel on the right side upon entering the church, above the chapel of Baldassarre Peruzzi from Siena. However, feeling he hadn't met the success he had envisioned, he returned to Bologna. There, he and the other artists mentioned competed with each other to create scenes from the Lives of Christ and His Mother in the Chapel of the Madonna in S. Petronio, located near the entrance on the right. The quality of their works was relatively similar. Still, Bartolommeo gained a reputation for having a softer yet stronger style than the others. Although Maestro Amico's scene of the Resurrection of Christ featured strange elements, like armed men in awkward poses and soldiers crushed by the stone of the tomb, Bartolommeo's work was praised more for its cohesive design and color. Because of this, Bartolommeo teamed up with Biagio Bolognese, who had more experience than artistic skill. Together, they worked at S. Salvatore for the Frati Scopetini, painting a refectory that depicted Christ feeding five thousand people with five loaves and two fishes, with parts done in fresco and others "a secco." They also painted the Disputation of S. Augustine in the library, showcasing a decent perspective view. These artists, having seen Raffaello's works and collaborated with him, showed a certain quality that promised excellence, but they didn't fully embrace the finer details of the art. Nevertheless, since there were no better painters in Bologna at the time, they were considered by the city's leaders and the public to be the best masters in Italy.

THE HOLY FAMILY WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo.
Bologna:
Accademia, 133)
Anderson
View larger image
THE HOLY FAMILY WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo.
Bologna:
Accademia, 133)
Anderson
View larger image
By the hand of Bartolommeo are some round pictures in fresco under the vaulting of the Palace of the Podestà, and a scene of the Visitation of S. Elizabeth in S. Vitale, opposite to the Palace of the Fantucci. In the Convent of the Servites at Bologna, round a panel-picture [Pg 209] of the Annunciation painted in oils, are some saints executed in fresco by Innocenzio da Imola. In S. Michele in Bosco Bartolommeo painted in fresco the Chapel of Ramazzotto, a faction-leader in Romagna. In a chapel in S. Stefano the same master painted two saints in fresco, with some little angels of considerable beauty in the sky; and in S. Jacopo, for Messer Annibale del Corello, a chapel in which he represented the Circumcision of Our Lord, with a number of figures, above which, in a lunette, he painted Abraham sacrificing his son to God. This work, in truth, was executed in a good and able manner. For the Misericordia, without Bologna, he painted a little panel-picture in distemper of Our Lady and some saints; with many pictures and other works, which are in the hands of various persons in that city.
By Bartolommeo's hand, there are some round fresco paintings under the vaulting of the Palace of the Podestà, and a scene of the Visitation of St. Elizabeth in St. Vitale, across from the Palace of the Fantucci. In the Convent of the Servites in Bologna, around a panel painting of the Annunciation done in oils, are some saints painted in fresco by Innocenzio da Imola. In St. Michele in Bosco, Bartolommeo frescoed the Chapel of Ramazzotto, a political leader in Romagna. In a chapel in St. Stefano, the same artist painted two saints in fresco, along with some beautiful little angels in the sky; and in St. Jacopo, for Messer Annibale del Corello, he created a chapel depicting the Circumcision of Our Lord, with several figures, above which, in a lunette, he painted Abraham sacrificing his son to God. This work was truly done skillfully and well. For the Misericordia, just outside Bologna, he painted a small tempera panel of Our Lady and some saints, along with many other paintings and works, which are now held by various people in that city.
This master, in truth, was above mediocrity both in the uprightness of his life and in his works, and he was superior to the others in drawing and invention, as may be seen from a drawing in our book, wherein is Jesus Christ, as a boy, disputing with the Doctors in the Temple, with a building executed with good mastery and judgment. In the end, he finished his life at the age of fifty-eight.
This master was truly exceptional, both in the integrity of his life and in his work. He surpassed others in drawing and creativity, as shown in a drawing in our book, depicting Jesus Christ as a boy arguing with the Doctors in the Temple, featuring a building rendered with great skill and insight. Ultimately, he passed away at the age of fifty-eight.
He had always been much envied by Amico of Bologna, an eccentric man of extravagant brain, whose figures, executed by him throughout all Italy, but particularly in Bologna, where he spent most of his time, are equally eccentric and even mad, if one may say so. If, indeed, the vast labour which Amico devoted to drawing had been pursued with a settled object, and not by caprice, he might perchance have surpassed many whom we regard as rare and able men. And even so, such is the value of persistent labour, that it is not possible that out of a mass of work there should not be found some that is good and worthy of praise; and such, among the vast number of works that this master executed, is a façade in chiaroscuro on the Piazza de' Marsigli, wherein are many historical pictures, with a frieze of animals fighting together, very spirited and well executed, which is almost the best work that he ever painted. He painted another façade at the Porta di S. Mammolo, and a frieze round the principal chapel of S. Salvatore, so extravagant and so full of absurdities that it would provoke laughter in one who was on the verge [Pg 210] of tears. In a word, there is no church or street in Bologna which has not some daub by the hand of this master.
He had always been envied by Amico of Bologna, an eccentric man with an elaborate mind. His works, created all over Italy but especially in Bologna, where he spent most of his time, are equally quirky and even a bit crazy, if one can say that. If Amico had focused his immense effort on drawing toward a specific goal instead of whimsical pursuits, he might have surpassed many others we consider talented and exceptional. Still, the value of consistent effort is such that it's impossible not to find some worthwhile pieces among the large volume of work he produced. One standout is a chiaroscuro façade in the Piazza de' Marsigli, featuring many historical scenes and a lively frieze of battling animals, which is arguably his best painting. He also painted another façade at the Porta di S. Mammolo and a frieze around the main chapel of S. Salvatore, so extravagant and absurd that it could make someone on the verge of tears laugh. In short, there isn't a church or street in Bologna without some piece of work by this master.
In Rome, also, he painted not a little; and in S. Friano, at Lucca, he filled a chapel with inventions fantastic and bizarre, among which are some things worthy of praise, such as the stories of the Cross and some of S. Augustine. In these are innumerable portraits of distinguished persons of that city; and, to tell the truth, this was one of the best works that Maestro Amico ever executed with colours in fresco.
In Rome, he painted quite a bit as well; and in S. Friano, at Lucca, he filled a chapel with fantastic and bizarre creations, among which are some commendable works, like the stories of the Cross and some related to St. Augustine. These include countless portraits of notable individuals from that city; and honestly, this was one of the best works that Maestro Amico ever created using fresco.
In S. Jacopo, at Bologna, he painted at the altar of S. Niccola some stories of the latter Saint, and below these a frieze with views in perspective, which deserve to be extolled. When the Emperor Charles V visited Bologna, Amico made a triumphal arch, for which Alfonso Lombardi executed statues in relief, at the gate of the Palace. And it is no marvel that the work of Amico revealed skill of hand rather than any other quality, for it is said that, like the eccentric and extraordinary person that he was, he went through all Italy drawing and copying every work of painting or relief, whether good or bad, on which account he became something of an adept in invention; and when he found anything likely to be useful to him, he laid his hands upon it eagerly, and then destroyed it, so that no one else might make use of it. The result of all this striving was that he acquired the strange, mad manner that we know.
In S. Jacopo, in Bologna, he painted some stories of St. Niccola at the altar, along with a frieze below that shows perspective views, which are worthy of praise. When Emperor Charles V visited Bologna, Amico created a triumphal arch, for which Alfonso Lombardi made relief statues at the Palace gate. It's not surprising that Amico's work showcased more technical skill than anything else, as it’s said that, being as eccentric and extraordinary as he was, he traveled all over Italy drawing and copying every artwork, good or bad. Because of this, he became quite skilled in invention. Whenever he found something he thought could be useful, he eagerly took it and then destroyed it, ensuring that no one else could use it. As a result of all this effort, he developed the strange, wild style that we recognize.
Finally, having reached the age of seventy, what with his art and the eccentricity of his life, he became raving mad, at which Messer Francesco Guicciardini, a noble Florentine, and a most trustworthy writer of the history of his own times, who was then Governor of Bologna, found no small amusement, as did the whole city. Some people, however, believe that there was some method mixed with this madness of his, because, having sold some property for a small price while he was mad and in very great straits, he asked for it back again when he regained his sanity, and recovered it under certain conditions, since he had sold it, so he said, when he was mad. I do not swear, indeed, that this is true, for it may have been otherwise; but I do say that I have often heard the story told.
Finally, at the age of seventy, due to his art and the quirks of his life, he went completely mad. This provided quite a bit of entertainment for Messer Francesco Guicciardini, a noble Florentine and a reliable historian of his time, who was then the Governor of Bologna, as well as the entire city. However, some people think there was a method to his madness because, after selling some property for a low price while he was out of his mind and in dire straits, he asked to have it back once he regained his sanity and managed to get it under certain conditions, claiming he sold it when he was mad. I can’t say for sure that this is true since it might be different, but I have often heard the story told.

THE ADORATION
(After the panel by Amico of Bologna [Amico Aspertini].
Bologna:
Pinacoteca, 297)
Alinari
View larger image
THE ADORATION
(After the panel by Amico of Bologna [Amico Aspertini].
Bologna:
Pinacoteca, 297)
Alinari
View larger image
Amico also gave his attention to sculpture, and executed to the best [Pg 211] of his ability, in marble, a Dead Christ with Nicodemus supporting Him. This work, which he treated in the manner seen in his pictures, is on the right within the entrance of the Church of S. Petronio. He used to paint with both hands at the same time, holding in one the brush with the bright colour, and in the other that with the dark. But the best joke of all was that he had his leather belt hung all round with little pots full of tempered colours, so that he looked like the Devil of S. Macario with all those flasks of his; and when he worked with his spectacles on his nose, he would have made the very stones laugh, and particularly when he began to chatter, for then he babbled enough for twenty, saying the strangest things in the world, and his whole demeanour was a comedy. Certain it is that he never used to speak well of any person, however able or good, and however well dowered he saw him to be by Nature or Fortune. And, as has been said, he so loved to chatter and tell stories, that one evening, at the hour of the Ave Maria, when a painter of Bologna, after buying cabbages in the Piazza, came upon Amico, the latter kept him under the Loggia del Podestà with his talk and his amusing stories, without the poor man being able to break away from him, almost till daylight, when Amico said: "Now go and boil your cabbages, for the time is getting on."
Amico also focused on sculpture and created, to the best of his ability, a Dead Christ with Nicodemus supporting Him in marble. This piece, which he approached in the same style as his paintings, is located on the right as you enter the Church of S. Petronio. He used to paint with both hands at the same time, holding a brush with bright paint in one hand and another with dark paint in the other. The best part was that he had his leather belt filled with little pots of mixed colors, making him look like the Devil of S. Macario with all his flasks. When he worked with his glasses perched on his nose, he could make even stones laugh, especially when he started to chatter. He would talk enough for twenty people, saying the most bizarre things, and his whole attitude was like a comedy show. It's clear he never spoke highly of anyone, no matter how talented or good they were, or how well-off he saw them to be by Nature or Fortune. And as mentioned, he loved to chatter and share stories so much that one evening, around the time of the Ave Maria, when a painter from Bologna came upon Amico after buying cabbages in the Piazza, Amico kept him under the Loggia del Podestà with his chatter and funny stories. The poor guy couldn't escape until nearly dawn, when Amico finally said, "Now go and boil your cabbages, because time's running out."
He was the author of a vast number of other jokes and follies, of which I shall not make mention, because it is now time to say something of Girolamo da Cotignola. This master painted many pictures and portraits from life in Bologna, and among them are two in the house of the Vinacci, which are very beautiful. He made a portrait after death of Monsignore de Foix, who died in the rout of Ravenna, and not long after he executed a portrait of Massimiliano Sforza. For S. Giuseppe he painted a panel-picture which brought him much praise, and, for S. Michele in Bosco, the panel-picture in oils which is in the Chapel of S. Benedetto. The latter work led to his executing, in company with Biagio Bolognese, all the scenes which are round that church, laid on in fresco and executed "a secco," wherein are seen proofs of no little mastery, as has been said in speaking of the manner of Biagio. The same Girolamo painted a large altar-piece for S. Colomba at Rimini, in competition with Benedetto da [Pg 212] Ferrara and Lattanzio, in which work he made a S. Lucia rather wanton than beautiful. And in the great tribune of that church he executed a Coronation of Our Lady, with the twelve Apostles and the four Evangelists, with heads so gross and hideous that they are an outrage to the eye.
He was the creator of a huge number of other jokes and antics, which I won’t mention, because it’s time to talk about Girolamo da Cotignola. This master painted many pictures and portraits from life in Bologna, including two in the Vinacci house that are very beautiful. He created a posthumous portrait of Monsignore de Foix, who died during the battle of Ravenna, and shortly after, he painted a portrait of Massimiliano Sforza. For S. Giuseppe, he made a panel painting that earned him a lot of praise, and for S. Michele in Bosco, he created an oil panel picture that is in the Chapel of S. Benedetto. This latter work led him, along with Biagio Bolognese, to execute all the scenes around that church, painted in fresco and done "a secco," where there are clear signs of a high level of skill, as has been mentioned in discussing Biagio's style. The same Girolamo painted a large altar piece for S. Colomba in Rimini, competing with Benedetto da [Pg 212] Ferrara and Lattanzio, where he depicted a S. Lucia that is more provocative than beautiful. In the main sanctuary of that church, he painted a Coronation of Our Lady, with the twelve Apostles and the four Evangelists, featuring heads so grotesque and ugly that they are a true eyesore.
He then returned to Bologna, but had not been there long when he went to Rome, where he made portraits from life of many men of rank, and in particular that of Pope Paul III. But, perceiving that it was no place for him, and that he was not likely to acquire honour, profit, or fame among so many noble craftsmen, he went off to Naples, where he found some friends who showed him favour, and above all M. Tommaso Cambi, a Florentine merchant, and a devoted lover of pictures and antiquities in marble, by whom he was supplied with everything of which he was in need. Thereupon, setting to work, he executed a panel-picture of the Magi, in oils, for the chapel of one M. Antonello, Bishop of I know not what place, in Monte Oliveto, and another panel-picture in oils for S. Aniello, containing the Madonna, S. Paul, and S. John the Baptist, with portraits from life for many noblemen.
He then returned to Bologna, but hadn’t been there long when he went to Rome, where he made lifelike portraits of many prominent figures, particularly Pope Paul III. Realizing that it wasn’t the right place for him and that he wouldn’t gain honor, profit, or fame among so many skilled artists, he left for Naples. There, he found some friends who supported him, especially M. Tommaso Cambi, a Florentine merchant and passionate lover of art and marble antiquities, who provided him with everything he needed. He then got to work and created an oil panel painting of the Magi for the chapel of M. Antonello, Bishop of a place I don't remember, in Monte Oliveto, and another oil panel painting for S. Aniello, featuring the Madonna, S. Paul, and S. John the Baptist, with lifelike portraits of many noblemen.
Being now well advanced in years, he lived like a miser, and was always trying to save money; and after no long time, having little more to do in Naples, he returned to Rome. There some friends of his, having heard that he had saved a few crowns, persuaded him that he ought to get married and live a properly-regulated life. And so, thinking that he was doing well for himself, he let those friends deceive him so completely that they imposed upon him for a wife, to suit their own convenience, a prostitute whom they had been keeping. Then, after he had married her and come to a knowledge of her, the truth was revealed, at which the poor old man was so grieved that he died in a few weeks at the age of sixty-nine.
Being well into his later years, he lived like a miser, constantly trying to save money. After a while, with little left to do in Naples, he returned to Rome. There, some friends of his, having heard that he had saved a few coins, convinced him that he should get married and lead a more organized life. Thinking he was making a good decision, he allowed those friends to trick him into marrying a prostitute they had been keeping for their own convenience. Once he married her and got to know her, the truth came out, leaving the poor old man so heartbroken that he died a few weeks later at the age of sixty-nine.
And now to say something of Innocenzio da Imola. This master was for many years in Florence with Mariotto Albertinelli; and then, having returned to Imola, he executed many works in that place. But finally, at the persuasion of Count Giovan Battista Bentivogli, he went to live in Bologna, where one of his first works was a copy of a picture [Pg 213] formerly executed by Raffaello da Urbino for Signor Leonello da Carpi. And for the Monks of S. Michele in Bosco he painted in fresco, in their chapter-house, the Death of Our Lady and the Resurrection of Christ, works which were executed with truly supreme diligence and finish. For the church of the same monks, also, he painted the panel of the high-altar, the upper part of which is done in a good manner. For the Servites of Bologna he executed an Annunciation on panel, and for S. Salvatore a Crucifixion, with many pictures of various kinds throughout the whole city. At the Viola, for the Cardinal of Ivrea, he painted three loggie in fresco, each containing two scenes, executed in colour from designs by other painters, and yet finished with much diligence. He painted in fresco a chapel in S. Jacopo, and for Madonna Benozza a panel-picture in oils, which was not otherwise than passing good. He made a portrait, also, besides many others, of Cardinal Francesco Alidosio, which I have seen at Imola, together with the portrait of Cardinal Bernardino Carvajal, and both are works of no little beauty.
And now let’s talk about Innocenzio da Imola. This master spent many years in Florence working with Mariotto Albertinelli and later returned to Imola, where he created many works. Eventually, encouraged by Count Giovan Battista Bentivoglio, he moved to Bologna, where one of his first projects was a copy of a painting that Raffaello da Urbino had previously made for Signor Leonello da Carpi. For the Monks of S. Michele in Bosco, he painted in fresco in their chapter-house the Death of Our Lady and the Resurrection of Christ, pieces that were executed with remarkable diligence and detail. He also painted the high altar panel for the same monks, with the upper section done quite well. For the Servites of Bologna, he created an Annunciation on panel and a Crucifixion for S. Salvatore, along with various paintings throughout the city. At the Viola, for the Cardinal of Ivrea, he painted three loggias in fresco, each featuring two scenes, painted in color based on designs by other artists, but finished with great care. He frescoed a chapel in S. Jacopo and created an oil panel painting for Madonna Benozza, which was quite good. Additionally, he made a portrait of Cardinal Francesco Alidosio, along with many others, including a portrait of Cardinal Bernardino Carvajal, both of which are quite beautiful works that I have seen in Imola.
Innocenzio was a very good and modest person, and therefore always avoided any dealings or intercourse with the painters of Bologna, who were quite the opposite in nature, and he was always exerting himself beyond the limits of his strength; wherefore, when he fell sick of a putrid fever at the age of fifty-six, it found him so weak and exhausted that it killed him in a few days. He left unfinished, or rather, scarcely begun, a work that he had undertaken without Bologna, and this was completed to perfection, according to the arrangement made by Innocenzio before his death, by Prospero Fontana, a painter of Bologna.
Innocenzio was a very kind and humble person, which is why he always steered clear of interacting with the painters from Bologna, who had a completely different approach. He pushed himself beyond his limits, and when he fell ill with a severe fever at the age of fifty-six, it left him so weak and drained that he passed away within a few days. He left a project unfinished, or really, barely started, that he had taken on outside of Bologna. This was later completed perfectly, based on the plans Innocenzio had made before he died, by Prospero Fontana, a painter from Bologna.
The works of all the above-named painters date from 1506 to 1542, and there are drawings by the hands of them all in our book.
The works of all the painters mentioned above are from 1506 to 1542, and there are drawings by each of them in our book.

THE MARRIAGE OF S. CATHARINE
(After the painting by Innocenzio da Imola.
Bologna: S. Giacomo
Maggiore)
Alinari
View larger image
THE MARRIAGE OF S. CATHARINE
(After the painting by Innocenzio da Imola.
Bologna: S. Giacomo
Maggiore)
Alinari
View larger image
[Pg 215] FRANCIABIGIO
[Pg 217] LIFE OF FRANCIABIGIO
[FRANCIA]
PAINTER OF FLORENCE
The fatigues that a man endures in this life in order to raise himself from the ground and protect himself from poverty, succouring not only himself but also his nearest and dearest, have such virtue, that the sweat and the hardships become full of sweetness, and bring comfort and nourishment to the minds of others, insomuch that Heaven, in its bounty, perceiving one drawn to a good life and to upright conduct, and also filled with zeal and inclination for the studies of the sciences, is forced to be benign and favourably disposed towards him beyond its wont; as it was, in truth, towards the Florentine painter Francia. This master, having applied himself to the art of painting for a just and excellent reason, laboured therein not so much out of a desire for fame as from a wish to bring assistance to his needy relatives; and having been born in a family of humble artisans, people of low degree, he sought to raise himself from that position. In this effort he was much spurred by his rivalry with Andrea del Sarto, then his companion, with whom for a long time he shared both work-room and the painter's life; on account of which life they made great proficience, one through the other, in the art of painting.
The struggles that a person faces in this life to lift themselves up from hardship and protect against poverty, helping not just themselves but also their loved ones, have such value that the sweat and difficulties become sweet and provide comfort and support to others. Because of this, Heaven, in its generosity, notices someone striving for a good life and righteous behavior, as well as being passionate and eager to learn about the sciences, and is compelled to be kind and supportive toward them beyond its usual nature; just like it was with the Florentine painter Francia. This artist dedicated himself to painting for a good and noble reason, working not so much for fame, but to help his struggling relatives. Coming from a family of humble craftsmen, he aimed to elevate himself from that status. His drive was greatly fueled by his competition with Andrea del Sarto, who was then his companion, with whom he shared both a workspace and the life of a painter for a long time; because of this shared experience, they both greatly advanced in the art of painting.
Francia learned the first principles of art in his youth by living for some months with Mariotto Albertinelli. And being much inclined to the study of perspective, at which he was always working out of pure delight, while still quite young he gained a reputation for great ability in Florence. The first works painted by him were a S. Bernard executed in fresco in S. Pancrazio, a church opposite to his own house, and a S. Catharine of Siena, executed likewise in fresco, on a pilaster in the Chapel of the [Pg 218] Rucellai; whereby, exerting himself in that art, he gave proofs of his fine qualities. Much more, even, was he established in repute by a picture which is in a little chapel in S. Pietro Maggiore, containing Our Lady with the Child in her arms, and a little S. John caressing Jesus Christ. He also gave proof of his excellence in a shrine executed in fresco, in which he painted the Visitation of Our Lady, on a corner of the Church of S. Giobbe, behind the Servite Convent in Florence. In the figure of that Madonna may be seen a goodness truly appropriate, with profound reverence in that of the older woman; and the S. Job he painted poor and leprous, and also rich and restored to health. This work so revealed his powers that he came into credit and fame; whereupon the men who were the rulers of that church and brotherhood gave him the commission for the panel-picture of their high-altar, in which Francia acquitted himself even better; and in that work he painted a Madonna, and S. Job in poverty, and made a portrait of himself in the face of S. John the Baptist.
Francia learned the basics of art in his youth by spending a few months with Mariotto Albertinelli. He was really drawn to perspective, constantly experimenting with it for his own enjoyment, and at a young age, he gained a reputation for his talent in Florence. His first works included a fresco of St. Bernard in St. Pancrazio, which was a church right across from his house, and a fresco of St. Catherine of Siena on a pilaster in the Chapel of the [Pg 218] Rucellai. Through his dedication to this art, he showcased his impressive skills. He further solidified his reputation with a picture in a small chapel in St. Pietro Maggiore, featuring Our Lady holding the Child and a young St. John hugging Jesus. He also demonstrated his talent with a fresco shrine where he painted the Visitation of Our Lady on a corner of the Church of St. Giobbe, located behind the Servite Convent in Florence. In the portrayal of that Madonna, there is a genuine kindness, while the older woman's expression conveys deep reverence; the depiction of St. Job showcases him as both poor and leprous, and later as wealthy and healthy again. This work truly highlighted his abilities, earning him respect and recognition. Consequently, the leaders of that church and brotherhood commissioned him to create a panel painting for their high altar, where Francia excelled even further. In that piece, he depicted a Madonna, St. Job in his impoverished state, and included a self-portrait in the face of St. John the Baptist.
There was built at that time, in S. Spirito at Florence, the Chapel of S. Niccola, in which was placed a figure of that Saint in the round, carved in wood from the model by Jacopo Sansovino; and Francia painted two little angels in two square pictures in oils, one on either side of that figure, which were much extolled, and also depicted the Annunciation in two round pictures; and the predella he adorned with little figures representing the miracles of S. Nicholas, executed with such diligence that he deserves much praise for them. In S. Pietro Maggiore, by the door, and on the right hand as one enters the church, is an Annunciation by his hand, wherein he made the Angel still flying through the sky, and the Madonna receiving the Salutation on her knees, in a most graceful attitude; and he drew there a building in perspective, which was a masterly thing, and was much extolled. And, in truth, although Francia had a somewhat dainty manner, because he was very laborious and constrained in his work, nevertheless he showed great care and diligence in giving the true proportions of art to his figures.
At that time, the Chapel of St. Nicholas was built in S. Spirito in Florence, featuring a life-sized wooden figure of the saint based on a model by Jacopo Sansovino. Francia painted two small angels in oil on square panels, one on each side of the figure, which received a lot of praise. He also created two round paintings of the Annunciation and decorated the predella with small figures depicting the miracles of St. Nicholas, executed so carefully that he deserves much acclaim for them. In S. Pietro Maggiore, near the entrance on the right side of the church, there's an Annunciation by him, where he depicted the angel still flying through the sky and the Madonna receiving the greeting on her knees in a very graceful pose. He also painted a building in perspective, which was masterful and widely praised. Although Francia had a somewhat delicate style due to his meticulous and restrained approach to his work, he displayed great care and diligence in capturing the true proportions of art in his figures.

THE MARRIAGE OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Franciabigio [Francia].
Florence: SS.
Annunziata)
Anderson
View larger image
THE MARRIAGE OF THE VIRGIN
(After the fresco by Franciabigio [Francia].
Florence: SS. Annunziata)
Anderson
View larger image
He was commissioned to execute a scene in the cloister in front of the Church of the Servites, in competition with Andrea del Sarto; and there he painted the Marriage of Our Lady, wherein may be clearly recognized [Pg 219] the supreme faith of Joseph, who shows in his face as much awe as joy at his marriage with her. Besides this, Francia painted there one who is giving him some blows, as is the custom in our own day, in memory of the wedding; and in a nude figure he expressed very happily the rage and disappointment that drive him to break his rod, which had not blossomed, the drawing of which, with many others, is in our book. In the company of Our Lady, also, he painted some women with most beautiful expressions and head-dresses, things in which he always delighted. And in all this scene he did not paint a single thing that was not very well considered; as is, for example, a woman with a child in her arms, who, turning to go home, has cuffed another child, who has sat down in tears and refuses to go, pressing one hand against his face in a very graceful manner. Certain it is that he executed every detail in this scene, whether large or small, with much diligence and love, on account of the burning desire that he had to show therein to craftsmen and to all other good judges how great was his respect for the difficulties of art, and how successfully he could solve them by faithful imitation.
He was hired to create a scene in the cloister in front of the Church of the Servites, competing with Andrea del Sarto; and there he painted the Marriage of Our Lady, where you can clearly see [Pg 219] Joseph’s deep faith, displaying as much awe as joy at marrying her. In addition, Francia depicted someone hitting him, just like they do today, as a reminder of the wedding; and in a nude figure, he skillfully captured the anger and disappointment that lead him to break his rod, which hadn’t bloomed, the drawing of which, along with many others, is in our book. Alongside Our Lady, he also painted several women with beautiful expressions and headpieces, things he always enjoyed. In this entire scene, he didn’t include a single element that wasn’t very well thought out; for example, a woman with a child in her arms, who, turning to go home, has slapped another child, who is sitting down in tears and refusing to move, pressing one hand against his face in a very graceful way. It’s clear that he executed every detail in this scene, whether big or small, with great care and passion, driven by a strong desire to show craftsmen and other discerning viewers how much he respected the challenges of art, and how effectively he could tackle them through faithful imitation.
Not long after this, on the occasion of a festival, the friars wished that the scenes of Andrea, and likewise that of Francia, should be uncovered; and the night after Francia had finished his with the exception of the base, they were so rash and presumptuous as to uncover them, not thinking, in their ignorance of art, that Francia would want to retouch or otherwise change his figures. In the morning, both the painting of Francia and those of Andrea were open to view, and the news was brought to Francia that Andrea's works and his own had been uncovered; at which he felt such resentment, that he was like to die of it. Seized with anger against the friars on account of their presumption and the little respect that they had shown to him, he set off at his best speed and came up to the work; and then, climbing on to the staging, which had not yet been taken to pieces, although the painting had been uncovered, and seizing a mason's hammer that was there, he beat some of the women's heads to fragments, and destroyed that of the Madonna, and also tore almost completely away from the wall, plaster and all, a nude figure that is breaking a rod. Hearing the noise, the friars ran up, [Pg 220] and, with the help of some laymen, seized his hands, to prevent him from destroying it completely. But, although in time they offered to give him double payment, he, on account of the hatred that he had conceived for them, would never restore it. By reason of the reverence felt by other painters both for him and for the work, they have refused to finish it; and so it remains, even in our own day, as a memorial of that event. This fresco is executed with such diligence and so much love, and it is so beautiful in its freshness, that Francia may be said to have worked better in fresco than any man of his time, and to have blended and harmonized his paintings in fresco better than any other, without needing to retouch the colours; wherefore he deserves to be much extolled both for this and for his other works.
Not long after this, during a festival, the friars decided to uncover the scenes by Andrea and also by Francia. The night after Francia finished his work, except for the base, they rashly opened them up, not realizing, due to their lack of artistic knowledge, that Francia would want to touch up or change his figures. In the morning, both Francia's painting and Andrea's were visible, and Francia was informed that his and Andrea's works had been uncovered, which made him immensely angry. Furious with the friars for their arrogance and the little respect they showed him, he rushed over to the site. Climbing onto the scaffolding, which hadn’t been taken down yet despite the painting being uncovered, he grabbed a mason's hammer that was nearby and smashed some of the women’s heads to pieces, destroyed the Madonna's head, and nearly pulled a nude figure that was breaking a rod off the wall, along with the plaster. Hearing the commotion, the friars quickly came over, and with the help of some laypeople, they grabbed his hands to stop him from completely ruining it. But even after they offered him double payment, he, driven by hatred for them, refused to restore it. Out of respect from other painters for him and the artwork, they have also declined to finish it, and it remains as a reminder of that incident even today. This fresco is done with such care and love, and its freshness is so beautiful that Francia can be said to have painted better in fresco than anyone else of his time, seamlessly blending and harmonizing his work without needing to retouch the colors; for this, he deserves great praise, both for this and for his other works.
At Rovezzano, without the Porta alla Croce, near Florence, he painted a shrine with a Christ on the Cross and some saints; and in S. Giovannino, at the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini, he executed a Last Supper of the Apostles in fresco.
At Rovezzano, near Florence and without the Porta alla Croce, he painted a shrine featuring Christ on the Cross along with some saints. At S. Giovannino, by the Porta a S. Piero Gattolini, he created a fresco of the Last Supper with the Apostles.
No long time after, on the departure for France of the painter Andrea del Sarto, who had begun to paint the stories of S. John the Baptist in chiaroscuro in a cloister of the Company of the Scalzo at Florence, the men of that Company, desiring to have that work finished, engaged Francia, to the end that he, being an imitator of the manner of Andrea, might complete the paintings begun by the other. Thereupon Francia executed the decorations right round one part of that cloister, and finished two of the scenes, which he painted with great diligence. These are, first S. John the Baptist obtaining leave from his father Zacharias to go into the desert, and then the meeting of Christ and S. John on the way, with Joseph and Mary standing there and beholding them embrace one another. But more than this he did not do, on account of the return of Andrea, who then went on to finish the rest of the work.
Not long after the painter Andrea del Sarto left for France, where he had started painting the stories of St. John the Baptist in chiaroscuro in a cloister of the Company of the Scalzo in Florence, the members of that Company wanted to have the work completed. They hired Francia, hoping he could finish the paintings since he was known for imitating Andrea's style. Francia then decorated one part of the cloister and completed two of the scenes, which he painted with great care. The first scene shows St. John the Baptist getting permission from his father, Zacharias, to go into the desert, and the second depicts the meeting between Christ and St. John on the road, with Joseph and Mary watching them embrace. However, he did not do more than this because Andrea returned and finished the rest of the work.
With Ridolfo Ghirlandajo he prepared a most beautiful festival for the marriage of Duke Lorenzo, with two sets of scenery for the dramas that were performed, executing them with much method, masterly judgment, and grace; on account of which he acquired credit and favour with that Prince. This service was the reason that he received the commission [Pg 221] for gilding the ceiling of the Hall of Poggio a Caiano, in company with Andrea di Cosimo. And afterwards, in competition with Andrea del Sarto and Jacopo da Pontormo, he began, on a wall in that hall, the scene of Cicero being carried in triumph by the citizens of Rome. This work had been undertaken by the liberality of Pope Leo, in memory of his father Lorenzo, who had caused the edifice to be built, and had ordained that it should be painted with scenes from ancient history and other ornaments according to his pleasure. And these had been entrusted by the learned historian, M. Paolo Giovio, Bishop of Nocera, who was then chief in authority near the person of Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, to Andrea del Sarto, Jacopo da Pontormo, and Franciabigio, that they might demonstrate the power and perfection of their art in the work, each receiving thirty crowns every month from the magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici. Thereupon Francia executed on his part, to say nothing of the beauty of the scene, some buildings in perspective, very well proportioned. But the work remained unfinished on account of the death of Leo; and afterwards, in the year 1532, it was begun again by Jacopo da Pontormo at the commission of Duke Alessandro de' Medici, but he lingered over it so long, that the Duke died and it was once more left unfinished.
With Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, he organized a stunning festival for Duke Lorenzo's wedding, creating two sets of scenery for the plays that were performed, executing them with great skill, judgment, and elegance; for this, he gained recognition and favor from the Duke. This accomplishment led to him receiving the commission [Pg 221] for gilding the ceiling of the Hall of Poggio a Caiano, alongside Andrea di Cosimo. Later, competing with Andrea del Sarto and Jacopo da Pontormo, he started a mural in that hall depicting Cicero being carried in triumph by the citizens of Rome. This project was funded by Pope Leo in memory of his father Lorenzo, who had commissioned the building and directed that it should be decorated with scenes from ancient history and other embellishments as he saw fit. The esteemed historian M. Paolo Giovio, Bishop of Nocera, who was then an influential figure close to Cardinal Giulio de' Medici, entrusted the project to Andrea del Sarto, Jacopo da Pontormo, and Franciabigio, allowing them to showcase their artistic prowess, with each receiving thirty crowns a month from the illustrious Ottaviano de' Medici. Francia contributed his part, not only enhancing the beauty of the scene but also creating well-proportioned buildings in perspective. However, the work remained unfinished due to Leo's death; then, in 1532, Jacopo da Pontormo resumed it at the request of Duke Alessandro de' Medici, but he took so long that the Duke died, leaving it incomplete once again.
But to return to Francia; so ardent was his love for the matters of art, that there was no summer day on which he did not draw some study of a nude figure from the life in his work-room, and to that end he always kept men in his pay. For S. Maria Nuova, at the request of Maestro Andrea Pasquali, an excellent physician of Florence, he executed an anatomical figure, in consequence of which he made a great advance in the art of painting, and pursued it ever afterwards with more zeal. He then painted in the Convent of S. Maria Novella, in the lunette over the door of the library, a S. Thomas confuting the heretics with his learning, a work which is executed with diligence and a good manner. There, among other details, are two children who serve to uphold an escutcheon in the ornamental border; and these are very fine, full of the greatest beauty and grace, and painted in a most lovely manner.
But back to Francia; his passion for art was so intense that there wasn’t a summer day when he didn’t create some studies of the human figure in his studio, and he always had models on his payroll for this purpose. For S. Maria Nuova, at the request of Maestro Andrea Pasquali, a renowned physician from Florence, he created an anatomical figure, which significantly advanced his painting skills, leading him to pursue his art with even more enthusiasm. He then painted a piece in the Convent of S. Maria Novella, in the lunette above the library door, depicting S. Thomas refuting heretics with his knowledge, a work that was done with great care and skill. Among other details in the piece are two children who support a coat of arms in the decorative border; these figures are beautifully rendered, full of grace and charm, and painted in an exquisite manner.
He also executed a picture with little figures for Giovanni Maria [Pg 222] Benintendi, in competition with Jacopo da Pontormo, who painted another of the same size for that patron, containing the story of the Magi; and two others were painted by Francesco d' Albertino.[12] In his work Francia represented the scene of David seeing Bathsheba in her bath; and there he painted some women in a manner too smooth and dainty, and drew a building in perspective, wherein is David giving letters to the messengers, who are to carry them to the camp to the end that Uriah the Hittite may meet his death; and under a loggia he painted a royal banquet of great beauty. This work contributed greatly to the fame and honour of Francia, who, if he had much ability for large figures, had much more for little figures.
He also created a painting with small figures for Giovanni Maria [Pg 222] Benintendi, competing with Jacopo da Pontormo, who painted a similar-sized piece for that patron featuring the story of the Magi. Additionally, two other pieces were painted by Francesco d' Albertino.[12] In his work, Francia depicted the scene of David seeing Bathsheba in her bath, where he portrayed some women in a style that was overly smooth and delicate. He also illustrated a building in perspective, showing David handing letters to the messengers, who were to deliver them to the camp so that Uriah the Hittite might meet his end. Beneath a loggia, he painted a beautifully rendered royal banquet. This work significantly enhanced Francia's fame and reputation, as he excelled in small figures even more than large ones.
Francia also made many most beautiful portraits from life; one, in particular, for Matteo Sofferroni, who was very much his friend, and another for a countryman, the steward of Pier Francesco de' Medici at the Palace of S. Girolamo da Fiesole, which seems absolutely alive, with many others. And since he undertook any kind of work without being ashamed, so long as he was pursuing his art, he set his hand to whatever commission was given to him; wherefore, in addition to many works of the meanest kind, he painted a most beautiful "Noli me tangere" for the cloth-weaver Arcangelo, at the top of a tower that serves as a terrace, in Porta Rossa; with an endless number of other trivial works, executed by Francia because he was a person of sweet and kindly nature and very obliging, of which there is no need to say more.
Francia also created many beautiful portraits from life; one in particular was for Matteo Sofferroni, who was a close friend, and another for a fellow countryman, the steward of Pier Francesco de' Medici at the Palace of S. Girolamo da Fiesole, which looks incredibly lifelike, along with many others. Additionally, he took on any task without hesitation as long as it was related to his art, so he accepted all kinds of commissions; thus, alongside many works of lesser quality, he painted a stunning "Noli me tangere" for the cloth-weaver Arcangelo at the top of a tower that serves as a terrace in Porta Rossa, with countless other minor works that Francia created because he was a kind and friendly person who was always willing to help, of which there's no need to elaborate further.

FRANCIABIGIO: PORTRAIT OF A MAN
(Vienna: Collection of Prince Liechtenstein. Canvas)
View larger image
FRANCIABIGIO: PORTRAIT OF A MAN
(Vienna: Collection of Prince Liechtenstein. Canvas)
View larger image
This master loved to live in peace, and for that reason would never take a wife; and he was always repeating the trite proverb, "The fruits of a wife are cares and strife." He would never leave Florence, because, having seen some works by Raffaello da Urbino, and feeling that he was not equal to that great man and to many others of supreme renown, he did not wish to compete with craftsmen of such rare excellence. In truth, the greatest wisdom and prudence that a man can possess is to know himself, and to refrain from exalting himself beyond his true worth. And, finally, having acquired much by constant work, for one who was not endowed by nature with much boldness of invention or with any [Pg 223] powers but those that he had gained by long study, he died in the year 1524 at the age of forty-two.
This master loved to live in peace, and for that reason, he would never take a wife; he was always saying the old saying, "The rewards of a wife are worries and conflict." He would never leave Florence because, after seeing some works by Raffaello da Urbino and realizing he wasn't on the same level as that great man and many others of supreme talent, he didn't want to compete with such exceptionally skilled craftsmen. In truth, the greatest wisdom and prudence a person can have is to understand themselves and not to overestimate their own worth. Finally, having achieved a lot through constant work—since he wasn’t naturally bold in creativity or gifted with any [Pg 223] abilities other than those he developed through long study—he passed away in 1524 at the age of forty-two.
One of Francia's disciples was his brother Agnolo, who died after having painted a frieze that is in the cloister of S. Pancrazio, and a few other works. The same Agnolo painted for the perfumer Ciano, an eccentric man, but respected after his kind, a sign for his shop, containing a gipsy woman telling the fortune of a lady in a very graceful manner, which was the idea of Ciano, and not without mystic meaning. Another who learnt to paint from the same master was Antonio di Donnino Mazzieri, who was a bold draughtsman, and showed much invention in making horses and landscapes. He painted in chiaroscuro the cloister of S. Agostino at Monte Sansovino, executing therein scenes from the Old Testament, which were much extolled. In the Vescovado of Arezzo he painted the Chapel of S. Matteo, with a scene, among other things, showing that Saint baptizing a King, in which he made a portrait of a German, so good that it seems to be alive. For Francesco del Giocondo he executed the story of the Martyrs in a chapel behind the choir of the Servite Church in Florence; but in this he acquitted himself so badly, that he lost all his credit and was reduced to undertaking any sort of work.
One of Francia's students was his brother Agnolo, who passed away after painting a frieze in the cloister of S. Pancrazio and a few other pieces. Agnolo also created a shop sign for an unusual but respected perfumer named Ciano, featuring a gypsy woman gracefully telling a lady's fortune, which was Ciano's idea and carried some mystical significance. Another pupil of the same master was Antonio di Donnino Mazzieri, a daring draftsman known for his creativity in depicting horses and landscapes. He painted the cloister of S. Agostino at Monte Sansovino in chiaroscuro, illustrating scenes from the Old Testament that received high praise. In the Vescovado of Arezzo, he painted the Chapel of S. Matteo, including a scene of the Saint baptizing a King, where he created a portrait of a German that looked incredibly lifelike. For Francesco del Giocondo, he completed the story of the Martyrs in a chapel behind the choir of the Servite Church in Florence; however, this work was so poorly executed that he lost all his reputation and was forced to take on any type of job.
Francia taught his art also to a young man named Visino, who, to judge from what we see of him, would have become an excellent painter, if he had not died young, as he did; and to many others, of whom I shall make no further mention. He was buried by the Company of S. Giobbe in S. Pancrazio, opposite to his own house, in the year 1525; and his death was truly a great grief to all good craftsmen, seeing that he had been a talented and skilful master, and very modest in his every action.
Francia also taught his art to a young man named Visino, who, judging by his work, would have been an excellent painter if he hadn't died young, as he did. He taught many others as well, but I won't mention them further. He was buried by the Company of S. Giobbe in S. Pancrazio, across from his own house, in 1525. His death was a significant loss for all good craftsmen since he was a talented and skilled master and very humble in everything he did.
[Pg 225] MORTO DA FELTRO AND ANDREA DI COSIMO FELTRINI
[Pg 227] LIVES OF MORTO DA FELTRO AND OF ANDREA DI COSIMO FELTRINI
PAINTERS
The painter Morto da Feltro, who was as original in his life as he was in his brain and in the new fashion of grotesques that he made, which caused him to be held in great estimation, found his way as a young man to Rome at the time when Pinturicchio was painting the Papal apartments for Alexander VI, with the loggie and lower rooms in the Great Tower of the Castello di S. Angelo, and some of the upper apartments. He was a melancholy person, and was constantly studying the antiquities; and seeing among them sections of vaults and ranges of walls adorned with grotesques, he liked these so much that he never ceased from examining them. And so well did he grasp the methods of drawing foliage in the ancient manner, that he was second to no man of his time in that profession. He was never tired, indeed, of examining all that he could find below the ground in Rome in the way of ancient grottoes, with vaults innumerable. He spent many months in Hadrian's Villa at Tivoli, drawing all the pavements and grottoes that are there, both above ground and below. And hearing that at Pozzuolo, in the Kingdom of Naples, ten miles from the city, there were many walls covered with ancient grotesques, both executed in relief with stucco and painted, and said to be very beautiful, he devoted several months to studying them on the spot. Nor was he content until he had drawn every least thing in the Campana, an ancient road in that place, full of antique sepulchres; and he also drew many of the temples and grottoes, both above and below the ground, at Trullo, near the seashore. He went to Baia and Mercato di Sabbato, both places full of ruined buildings covered with scenes, [Pg 228] searching out everything in such a manner that by means of his long and loving labour he grew vastly in power and knowledge of his art.
The painter Morto da Feltro, who was as unique in his life as he was in his mind and in the new style of grotesques he created, which earned him great respect, made his way to Rome as a young man when Pinturicchio was painting the Papal apartments for Alexander VI, including the loggias and lower rooms in the Great Tower of the Castello di S. Angelo, and some of the upper rooms. He was a thoughtful person and constantly studied ancient artifacts; noticing sections of vaults and walls decorated with grotesques, he became so fascinated that he continued to examine them. He mastered the techniques of drawing foliage in the ancient style so well that he was unmatched by anyone of his time in that field. He tirelessly explored everything he could find underground in Rome regarding ancient grottoes, with countless vaults. He spent months at Hadrian's Villa in Tivoli, sketching all the pavements and grottoes there, both above and below ground. When he heard that Pozzuolo, in the Kingdom of Naples, ten miles from the city, had many walls adorned with ancient grotesques, both in relief with stucco and painted, which were said to be stunning, he dedicated several months to studying them on-site. He was not satisfied until he had drawn every detail in the Campana, an ancient road in that area filled with old tombs; he also sketched many temples and grottoes, both above and below ground, at Trullo, near the coast. He visited Baia and Mercato di Sabbato, both locations rich with ruined buildings covered in scenes, [Pg 228] exploring everything so thoroughly that through his dedicated and passionate work, he greatly enhanced his skills and knowledge of his art.
Having then returned to Rome, he worked there many months, giving his attention to figures, since he considered that in that part of his profession he was not the master that he was held to be in the execution of grotesques. And after he had conceived this desire, hearing the renown that Leonardo and Michelagnolo had in that art on account of the cartoons executed by them in Florence, he set out straightway to go to that city. But, after he had seen those works, he did not think himself able to make the same improvement that he had made in his first profession, and he went back, therefore, to work at his grotesques.
Having returned to Rome, he worked there for many months, focusing on figures, as he felt he wasn't as skilled in that area compared to his expertise in creating grotesques. After developing this interest, he heard about the fame of Leonardo and Michelangelo in that art due to the cartoons they had created in Florence, and he immediately set out for that city. However, after seeing those works, he realized he couldn't achieve the same level of improvement he had in his original craft, so he decided to go back to working on his grotesques.
There was then living in Florence one Andrea di Cosimo Feltrini, a painter of that city, and a young man of much diligence, who received Morto into his house and entertained him with most affectionate attentions. Finding pleasure in the nature of Morto's art, Andrea also gave his mind to that vocation, and became an able master, being in time even more excellent than Morto, and much esteemed in Florence, as will be told later. And it was through Andrea that Morto came to paint for Piero Soderini, who was then Gonfalonier, decorations of grotesques in an apartment of the Palace, which were held to be very beautiful; but in our own day these have been destroyed in rearranging the apartments of Duke Cosimo, and repainted. For Maestro Valerio, a Servite friar, Morto decorated the empty space on a chair-back, which was a most beautiful work; and for Agnolo Doni, likewise, in a chamber, he executed many pictures with a variety of bizarre grotesques. And since he also delighted in figures, he painted Our Lady in some round pictures, in order to see whether he could become as famous for them as he was (for his grotesques).
There was a man living in Florence named Andrea di Cosimo Feltrini, a painter from the city, who was a hardworking young man. He welcomed Morto into his home and treated him with great kindness. Enjoying Morto's artistic style, Andrea decided to pursue that path as well and eventually became an accomplished master, surpassing Morto and earning great respect in Florence, as will be discussed later. Through Andrea, Morto got the opportunity to paint for Piero Soderini, who was then Gonfalonier, creating beautiful grotesque decorations in a room of the Palace. Unfortunately, these works were destroyed during renovations by Duke Cosimo and were repainted. For Maestro Valerio, a Servite friar, Morto adorned an empty spot on a chair-back, which was a stunning piece of art. He also painted numerous pictures with various strange grotesques for Agnolo Doni in another room. Additionally, since he enjoyed painting figures, he created some round images of Our Lady, hoping to gain as much recognition for them as he did for his grotesques.
Then, having grown weary of staying in Florence, he betook himself to Venice; and attaching himself to Giorgione da Castelfranco, who was then painting the Fondaco de' Tedeschi, he set himself to assist him and executed the ornamentation of that work. And in this way he remained many months in that city, attracted by the sensuous pleasures and delights that he found there.
Then, tired of staying in Florence, he traveled to Venice; and becoming involved with Giorgione da Castelfranco, who was painting the Fondaco de' Tedeschi, he helped him out and worked on the decoration of that piece. In this way, he spent several months in the city, drawn in by the sensual pleasures and delights he discovered there.
[Pg 229] He then went to execute works in Friuli, but he had not been there long when, finding that the rulers of Venice were enlisting soldiers, he entered their service; and before he had had much experience of that calling he was made Captain of two hundred men. The army of the Venetians had advanced by that time to Zara in Sclavonia; and one day, when a brisk skirmish took place, Morto, desiring to win a greater name in that profession than he had gained in the art of painting, went bravely forward, and, after fighting in the mêlée, was left dead on the field, even as he had always been in name,[13] at the age of forty-five. But in fame he will never be dead, because those who exercise their hands in the arts and produce everlasting works, leaving memorials of themselves after death, are destined never to suffer the death of their labours, for writers, in their gratitude, bear witness to their talents. Eagerly, therefore, should our craftsmen spur themselves on with incessant study to such a goal as will ensure them an undying name both through their own works and through the writings of others, since, by so doing, they will gain eternal life both for themselves and for the works that they leave behind them after death.
[Pg 229] He then went to work in Friuli, but he hadn’t been there long when he saw that the rulers of Venice were recruiting soldiers, so he joined their ranks; and before he had much experience in that role, he was appointed Captain of two hundred men. By that time, the Venetian army had moved to Zara in Sclavonia; and one day, during a fierce skirmish, Morto wanted to make a bigger name for himself in this new career than he had in painting, so he bravely advanced and, after fighting in the fray, was left dead on the field, just as he had always been in name,[13] at the age of forty-five. But in fame, he will never be forgotten, because those who create art and produce lasting works leave behind a legacy that ensures they never fade away, as writers, in their gratitude, bear witness to their talents. Therefore, our craftsmen should passionately motivate themselves with continuous study toward a goal that will guarantee them an immortal name, both through their own work and through the writings of others, since, in doing so, they will achieve eternal life for themselves and the works they leave behind after death.
Morto restored the painting of grotesques in a manner more like the ancient than was achieved by any other painter, and for this he deserves infinite praise, in that it is after his example that they have been brought in our own day, by the hands of Giovanni da Udine and other craftsmen, to the great beauty and excellence that we see. For, although the said Giovanni and others have carried them to absolute perfection, it is none the less true that the chief praise is due to Morto, who was the first to bring them to light and to devote his whole attention to paintings of that kind, which are called grotesques because they were found for the most part in the grottoes of the ruins of Rome; besides which, every man knows that it is easy to make additions to anything once it has been discovered.
Morto restored the grotesque painting in a way that was more like the ancient style than any other painter managed, and for this, he deserves endless praise. It's thanks to his example that they've been brought into our time by Giovanni da Udine and other craftsmen to the great beauty and excellence we see today. Although Giovanni and others have perfected them, the main credit goes to Morto, who was the first to highlight these works and dedicate his entire focus to this type of painting, which is called grotesques because they were mostly found in the grottoes of Rome's ruins. Moreover, everyone knows it's easy to add to something once it has been discovered.
The painting of grotesques was continued in Florence by Andrea Feltrini, called Di Cosimo, because he was a disciple of Cosimo Rosselli in the study of figures (which he executed passing well), as he was afterwards [Pg 230] of Morto in that of grotesques, of which we have spoken. In this kind of painting Andrea had from nature such power of invention and such grace that he was the first to make ornaments of greater grandeur, abundance, and richness than the ancient, and quite different in manner; and he gave them better order and cohesion, and enriched them with figures, such as are not seen in Rome or in any other place but Florence, where he executed a great number. In this respect there has never been any man who has surpassed him in excellence, as may be seen from the ornament and the predella painted with little grotesques in colour round the Pietà that Pietro Perugino executed for the altar of the Serristori in S. Croce at Florence. These are heightened with various colours on a ground of red and black mixed together, and are wrought with much facility and with extraordinary boldness and grace.
The painting of grotesques continued in Florence with Andrea Feltrini, known as Di Cosimo, because he was a student of Cosimo Rosselli in figure drawing (which he executed quite well). Later, he became a disciple of Morto in the study of grotesques, which we have previously discussed. In this style of painting, Andrea had such a natural ability for invention and grace that he was the first to create ornaments that were grander, more abundant, and richer than those of the ancients, and quite different in style. He arranged them with better order and cohesion and added figures that are not found in Rome or anywhere else but Florence, where he produced a significant number. In this regard, no one has ever surpassed him in excellence, as can be seen in the ornament and the predella painted with small colored grotesques surrounding the Pietà created by Pietro Perugino for the altar of the Serristori in S. Croce at Florence. These are highlighted with various colors on a background of mixed red and black, crafted with great ease and remarkable boldness and grace.
Andrea introduced the practice of covering the façades of houses and palaces with an intonaco of lime mixed with the black of ground charcoal, or rather, burnt straw, on which intonaco, when still fresh, he spread a layer of white plaster. Then, having drawn the grotesques, with such divisions as he desired, on some cartoons, he dusted them over the intonaco, and proceeded to scratch it with an iron tool, in such a way that his designs were traced over the whole façade by that tool; after which, scraping away the white from the grounds of the grotesques, he went on to shade them or to hatch a good design upon them with the same iron tool. Finally, he went over the whole work, shading it with a liquid water-colour like water tinted with black. All this produces a very pleasing, rich, and beautiful effect; and there was an account of the method in the twenty-sixth chapter, dealing with sgraffiti, in the Treatise on Technique.
Andrea introduced the technique of covering the exteriors of houses and palaces with a layer of lime mixed with ground charcoal or burnt straw. While the mixture was still fresh, he applied a layer of white plaster on top. He then drew grotesques on some cartoons, dusted them onto the plaster, and used an iron tool to trace his designs across the entire façade. After that, he scraped away the white plaster around the grotesques and added shading or cross-hatching to enhance the designs with the same iron tool. Finally, he went over the entire work, applying a liquid watercolor tinted black for shading. This method creates a very pleasing, rich, and beautiful effect, and there is a description of the technique in the twenty-sixth chapter on sgraffiti in the Treatise on Technique.
The first façades that Andrea executed in this manner were that of the Gondi, which is full of delicacy and grace, in Borg' Ognissanti, and that of Lanfredino Lanfredini, which is very ornate and rich in the variety of its compartments, on the Lungarno between the Ponte S. Trinita and the Ponte della Carraja, near S. Spirito. He also decorated in sgraffito the house of Andrea and Tommaso Sertini, near S. Michele in Piazza Padella, making it more varied and grander in manner than [Pg 231] the two others. He painted in chiaroscuro the façade of the Church of the Servite Friars, for which work he caused the painter Tommaso di Stefano to paint in two niches the Angel bringing the Annunciation to the Virgin; and in the court, where there are the stories of S. Filippo and of Our Lady painted by Andrea del Sarto, he executed between the two doors a very beautiful escutcheon of Pope Leo X. And on the occasion of the visit of that Pontiff to Florence he executed many beautiful ornaments in the form of grotesques on the façade of S. Maria del Fiore, for Jacopo Sansovino, who gave him his sister for wife. He executed the baldachin under which the Pope walked, covering the upper part with most beautiful grotesques, and the hangings round it with the arms of that Pope and other devices of the Church; and this baldachin was afterwards presented to the Church of S. Lorenzo in Florence, where it is still to be seen. He also decorated many standards and banners for the visit of Leo, and in honour of many who were made Chevaliers by that Pontiff and by other Princes, of which there are some hung up in various churches in that city.
The first facades that Andrea created in this style were for the Gondi, which is full of delicacy and grace, located in Borg' Ognissanti, and for Lanfredino Lanfredini, which is very ornate and rich in its variety of compartments, on the Lungarno between the Ponte S. Trinita and the Ponte della Carraja, near S. Spirito. He also decorated the house of Andrea and Tommaso Sertini with sgraffito, near S. Michele in Piazza Padella, making it more varied and grander in style than [Pg 231] the two others. He painted the facade of the Church of the Servite Friars in chiaroscuro, for which he had painter Tommaso di Stefano create the Angel bringing the Annunciation to the Virgin in two niches; and in the courtyard, where there are stories of S. Filippo and Our Lady painted by Andrea del Sarto, he executed a very beautiful escutcheon of Pope Leo X between the two doors. During the visit of that Pontiff to Florence, he created many beautiful ornaments in the form of grotesques on the facade of S. Maria del Fiore, for Jacopo Sansovino, who gave him his sister to marry. He made the baldachin under which the Pope walked, adorning the upper part with stunning grotesques, and the hangings surrounding it with the Pope's arms and other Church symbols; this baldachin was later presented to the Church of S. Lorenzo in Florence, where it can still be seen. He also decorated many standards and banners for Leo's visit, and in honor of many who were made Chevaliers by that Pontiff and other Princes, some of which are displayed in various churches throughout the city.
Andrea, working constantly in the service of the house of Medici, assisted at the preparations for the wedding of Duke Giuliano and that of Duke Lorenzo, executing an abundance of various ornaments in the form of grotesques; and so, also, in the obsequies of those Princes. In all this he was largely employed by Franciabigio, Andrea del Sarto, Pontormo, and Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, and by Granaccio for triumphal processions and other festivals, since nothing good could be done without him. He was the best man that ever touched a brush, and, being timid by nature, he would never undertake any work on his own account, because he was afraid of exacting the money for his labours. He delighted to work the whole day long, and disliked annoyances of any kind; for which reason he associated himself with the gilder Mariotto di Francesco, one of the most able and skilful men at his work that ever existed in the world of art, very adroit in obtaining commissions, and most dexterous in exacting payments and doing business. This Mariotto also brought the gilder Raffaello di Biagio into the partnership, and the three worked together, sharing equally all the earnings of the commissions that they [Pg 232] executed; and this association lasted until death parted them, Mariotto being the last to die.
Andrea, constantly working for the Medici family, helped prepare for the weddings of Duke Giuliano and Duke Lorenzo, creating a variety of decorative grotesques. He was also involved in the funerals of those princes. In all this, he was frequently employed by Franciabigio, Andrea del Sarto, Pontormo, Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, and Granaccio for triumphal parades and other celebrations, as nothing significant could be accomplished without him. He was the best artist to ever pick up a brush and, being naturally shy, he never took on work by himself because he was afraid of asking for payment for his efforts. He enjoyed working all day and wanted to avoid any disturbances, which is why he teamed up with the gilder Mariotto di Francesco, one of the most talented and skilled artisans in the art world, who was very good at getting commissions and was clever at ensuring he received payments. Mariotto also brought in the gilder Raffaello di Biagio to join their partnership, and the three of them worked together, sharing all the earnings from the commissions they [Pg 232] completed, and this collaboration continued until death separated them, with Mariotto being the last to pass away.
To return to the works of Andrea; he decorated for Giovanni Maria Benintendi all the ceilings of his house, and executed the ornamentation of the ante-chambers, wherein are the scenes painted by Franciabigio and Jacopo da Pontormo. He went with Franciabigio to Poggio, and executed in terretta the ornaments for all the scenes there in such a way that there is nothing better to be seen. For the Chevalier Guidotti he decorated in sgraffito the façade of his house in the Via Larga, and he also executed another of great beauty for Bartolommeo Panciatichi, on the house (now belonging to Ruberto de' Ricci) which he built on the Piazza degli Agli. Nor am I able to describe all the friezes, coffers, and strong-boxes, or the vast quantity of ceilings, which Andrea decorated with his own hand, for the whole city is full of these, and I must refrain from speaking of them. But I must mention the round escutcheons of various kinds that he made, for they were such that no wedding could take place without his having his workshop besieged by one citizen or another; nor could any kind of brocade, linen, or cloth of gold, with flowered patterns, ever be woven, without his making the designs for them, and that with so much variety, grace, and beauty, that he breathed spirit and life into all such things. If Andrea, indeed, had known his own value, he would have made a vast fortune; but it sufficed him to live in love with his art.
To get back to Andrea's works; he decorated all the ceilings of Giovanni Maria Benintendi's house and created the ornamentation for the ante-chambers, which feature scenes painted by Franciabigio and Jacopo da Pontormo. He went with Franciabigio to Poggio and crafted the decorations for all the scenes there in such a way that nothing better can be seen. For Chevalier Guidotti, he decorated the façade of his house on Via Larga in sgraffito, and he also created another beautiful piece for Bartolommeo Panciatichi on the house (now owned by Ruberto de' Ricci) that he built in Piazza degli Agli. I can’t possibly describe all the friezes, coffers, and strong-boxes, or the countless ceilings that Andrea decorated himself, as the entire city is full of these, and I must hold back from detailing them all. However, I must mention the various round escutcheons he made, as no wedding could happen without him being swarmed by citizens at his workshop; nor could any brocade, linen, or gold cloth with floral patterns ever be woven without him designing them, each with so much variety, grace, and beauty that he brought them to life. If Andrea had truly understood his worth, he could have made a fortune; but he was content to live for his art.
I must not omit to tell that in my youth, while in the service of Duke Alessandro de' Medici, I was commissioned, when Charles V came to Florence, to make the banners for the Castle, or rather, as it is called at the present day, the Citadel; and among these was a standard of crimson cloth, eighteen braccia wide at the staff and forty in length, and surrounded by borders of gold containing the devices of the Emperor Charles V and of the house of Medici, with the arms of his Majesty in the centre. For this work, in which were used forty-five thousand leaves of gold, I summoned to my assistance Andrea for the borders and Mariotto for the gilding; and many things did I learn from that good Andrea, so full of love and kindness for those who were studying art. And so great [Pg 233] did the skill of Andrea then prove to be, that, besides availing myself of him for many details of the arches that were erected for the entry of his Majesty, I chose him as my companion, together with Tribolo, when Madama Margherita, daughter of Charles V, came to be married to Duke Alessandro, in making the festive preparations that I executed in the house of the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici on the Piazza di S. Marco, which was adorned with grotesques by his hand, with statues by the hand of Tribolo, and with figures and scenes by my hand. At the last he was much employed for the obsequies of Duke Alessandro, and even more for the marriage of Duke Cosimo, when all the devices in the courtyard, described by M. Francesco Giambullari, who wrote an account of the festivities of that wedding, were painted by Andrea with ornaments of great variety. And then Andrea—who, by reason of a melancholy humour which often oppressed him, was on many occasions on the point of taking his own life, but was observed so closely and guarded so well by his companion Mariotto that he lived to be an old man—finished the course of his life at the age of sixty-four, leaving behind him the name of a good and even rarely excellent master of grotesque-painting in our own times, wherein every succeeding craftsman has always imitated his manner, not only in Florence, but also in other places.
I have to mention that during my youth, while serving Duke Alessandro de' Medici, I was tasked with creating the banners for the Castle, which is now known as the Citadel, when Charles V visited Florence. One of these banners was made of crimson cloth, eighteen braccia wide at the staff and forty long, surrounded by gold borders featuring the emblems of Emperor Charles V and the Medici family, with his Majesty's coat of arms in the center. For this project, which used forty-five thousand leaves of gold, I called on Andrea to help with the borders and Mariotto for the gilding. I learned a lot from the kind and supportive Andrea, who was always willing to teach those studying art. Andrea showed such exceptional skill that I enlisted him for many details of the arches built for the entrance of his Majesty, and I chose him as my partner, along with Tribolo, when Madama Margherita, daughter of Charles V, was married to Duke Alessandro. We worked on the festive decorations at the home of the Magnificent Ottaviano de' Medici on the Piazza di S. Marco, which was embellished with grotesques by Andrea, statues by Tribolo, and figures and scenes by me. Later, Andrea was heavily involved in the funeral of Duke Alessandro and even more so for Duke Cosimo's wedding, where he painted all the designs in the courtyard, which were described by M. Francesco Giambullari in his account of the wedding festivities, with a variety of elaborate ornaments. Andrea—who often struggled with a melancholic mood that nearly drove him to take his own life, but was carefully watched over by his companion Mariotto—lived to be an old man and passed away at sixty-four, leaving behind a legacy as a good and truly exceptional master of grotesque painting in our time, one that every following craftsman has sought to imitate, not just in Florence but in other places as well.
[Pg 235] MARCO CALAVRESE
[Pg 237] LIFE OF MARCO CALAVRESE
PAINTER
When the world possesses some great light in any science, every least part is illuminated by its rays, some with greater brightness and some with less; and the miracles that result are also greater or less according to differences of air and place. Constantly, in truth, do we see a particular country producing a particular kind of intellect fitted for a particular kind of work, for which others are not fitted, nor can they ever attain, whatever labours they may endure, to the goal of supreme excellence. And if we marvel when we see growing in some province a fruit that has not been wont to grow there, much more can we rejoice in a man of fine intellect when we find him in a country where men of the same bent are not usually born. Thus it was with the painter Marco Calavrese, who, leaving his own country, chose for his habitation the sweet and pleasant city of Naples. He had been minded, indeed, on setting out, to make his way to Rome, and there to achieve the end that rewards the student of painting; but the song of the Siren was so sweet to him, and all the more because he delighted to play on the lute, and the soft waters of Sebeto so melted his heart, that he remained a prisoner in body of that land until he rendered up his spirit to Heaven and his mortal flesh to earth.
When a certain area has a significant breakthrough in any science, even the smallest details are lit up by its light, some shining brighter than others. The resulting achievements can also vary in impact depending on the environment. We often observe that a specific region produces a unique type of intelligence suited for certain tasks, while others may strive but never reach the pinnacle of excellence. If we are amazed to see unusual fruits growing in a certain region, we should be even more delighted when we discover a remarkable person in a place where such talent is rare. This was the case with the painter Marco Calavrese, who left his homeland to settle in the beautiful and charming city of Naples. Initially, he planned to head to Rome to pursue his artistic ambitions, but the enchanting music of the Sirens captivated him, especially since he loved playing the lute. The gentle waters of Sebeto touched his heart so deeply that he became a lifelong resident of that land until he departed from this world, leaving his spirit to Heaven and his body to the earth.
Marco executed innumerable works in oils and in fresco, and he proved himself more able than any other man who was practising the same art in that country in his day. Of this we have proof in the work that he executed at Aversa, ten miles distant from Naples; and, above all, in a panel-picture in oils on the high-altar of the Church of S. Agostino, with a large ornamental frame, and various pictures painted with scenes [Pg 238] and figures, in which he represented S. Augustine disputing with the heretics, with stories of Christ and Saints in various attitudes both above and at the sides. In this work, which shows a manner full of harmony and drawing towards the good manner of our modern works, may also be seen great beauty and facility of colouring; and it was one of the many labours that he executed in that city and for various places in the kingdom.
Marco created countless oil and fresco works, proving to be more skilled than anyone else practicing the same art in his country at that time. We see evidence of this in the work he did in Aversa, ten miles from Naples; especially in an oil panel painting on the high altar of the Church of S. Agostino, framed ornately, featuring various images with scenes [Pg 238] and figures depicting S. Augustine debating with heretics, alongside stories of Christ and Saints in different poses above and to the sides. This piece displays a style full of harmony and leans towards the refined style of modern works, showcasing remarkable beauty and ease of coloring; it was one of many projects he completed in that city and throughout the kingdom.
Marco always lived a gay life, enjoying every minute to the full, for the reason that, having no rivalry to contend with in painting from other craftsmen, he was always adored by the Neapolitan nobles, and contrived to have himself rewarded for his works by ample payments. And so, having come to the age of fifty-six, he ended his life after an ordinary illness.
Marco always lived a carefree life, enjoying every moment to the fullest. Since he didn't have to compete with other artists in painting, he was always admired by the Neapolitan nobles and managed to get well-paid for his work. So, by the time he reached fifty-six, he passed away after a common illness.
He left a disciple in Giovan Filippo Crescione, a painter of Naples, who executed many pictures in company with his brother-in-law, Leonardo Castellani, as he still does; but of these men, since they are alive and in constant practice of their art, there is no need to make mention.
He left a student in Giovan Filippo Crescione, a painter from Naples, who created many paintings alongside his brother-in-law, Leonardo Castellani, as he still does. However, since these artists are alive and actively practicing their craft, there's no need to mention them.
The pictures of Maestro Marco were executed by him between 1508 and 1542. He had a companion in another Calabrian (whose name I do not know), who worked for a long time in Rome with Giovanni da Udine and executed many works by himself in that city, particularly façades in chiaroscuro. The same Calabrian also painted in fresco the Chapel of the Conception in the Church of the Trinità, with much skill and diligence.
The pictures by Maestro Marco were created by him between 1508 and 1542. He had a partner, another Calabrian (whose name I don't know), who worked for a long time in Rome with Giovanni da Udine and created many of his own works in that city, especially façades in chiaroscuro. This same Calabrian also skillfully and diligently painted the frescoes in the Chapel of the Conception in the Church of the Trinità.
At this same time lived Niccola, commonly called by everyone Maestro Cola dalla Matrice, who executed many works in Calabria, at Ascoli, and at Norcia, which are very well known, and which gained for him the name of a rare master—the best, indeed, that there had ever been in these parts. And since he also gave his attention to architecture, all the buildings that were erected in his day at Ascoli and throughout all that province had him as architect. Cola, without caring to see Rome or to change his country, remained always at Ascoli, living happily for some time with his wife, a woman of good and honourable family, and endowed with extraordinary nobility of spirit, as was proved when the strife of [Pg 239] parties arose at Ascoli, in the time of Pope Paul III. For then, while she was flying with her husband, with many soldiers in pursuit, more on her account (for she was a very beautiful young woman) than for any other reason, she resolved, not seeing any other way in which she could save her own honour and the life of her husband, to throw herself from a high cliff to the depth below. At which all the soldiers believed that she was not only mortally injured, but dashed to pieces, as indeed she was; wherefore they left the husband without doing him any harm, and returned to Ascoli. After the death of this extraordinary woman, worthy of eternal praise, Maestro Cola passed the rest of his life with little happiness. A short time afterwards, Signor Alessandro Vitelli, who had become Lord of Matrice,[14] took Maestro Cola, now an old man, to Città di Castello, where he caused him to paint in his palace many works in fresco and many other pictures; which works finished, Maestro Cola returned to finish his life at Matrice.
At this same time, there was Niccola, known to everyone as Maestro Cola dalla Matrice, who created many well-known works in Calabria, Ascoli, and Norcia. He earned a reputation as a rare master—the best that these areas had ever seen. Since he was also involved in architecture, he designed all the buildings erected in his time in Ascoli and throughout the province. Cola never felt the urge to visit Rome or leave his hometown; he always stayed in Ascoli, happily living for a while with his wife, a woman from a good and honorable family, who had an extraordinary noble spirit. This was evident during the party conflicts in Ascoli when Pope Paul III was in power. When her husband was fleeing with many soldiers in pursuit, largely because of her beauty, she decided that the only way to save both her honor and her husband's life was to jump from a high cliff. The soldiers thought she had not only been severely injured but was killed, so they left her husband unharmed and returned to Ascoli. After the death of this extraordinary woman, deserving of eternal praise, Maestro Cola lived out the rest of his life with little happiness. Shortly after, Signor Alessandro Vitelli, who had become Lord of Matrice, took the now-elderly Maestro Cola to Città di Castello, where he had him paint many frescoes and other works in his palace. Once these works were completed, Maestro Cola returned to spend his final days in Matrice.
This master would have acquitted himself not otherwise than passing well, if he had practised his art in places where rivalry and emulation might have made him attend with more study to painting, and exercise the beautiful intellect with which it is evident that he was endowed by nature.
This master would have done just fine if he had practiced his craft in places where competition and ambition could have pushed him to focus more on painting and use the incredible talent that it’s clear he was born with.
[Pg 241] FRANCESCO MAZZUOLI
[Pg 243] LIFE OF FRANCESCO MAZZUOLI
[PARMIGIANO]
PAINTER OF PARMA
Among the many natives of Lombardy who have been endowed with the gracious gift of design, with a lively spirit of invention, and with a particular manner of making beautiful landscapes in their pictures, we should rate as second to none, and even place before all the rest, Francesco Mazzuoli of Parma, who was bountifully endowed by Heaven with all those parts that are necessary to make a supreme painter, insomuch that he gave to his figures, in addition to what has been said of many others, a certain nobility, sweetness, and grace in the attitudes which belonged to him alone. To his heads, likewise, it is evident that he gave all the consideration that is needful; and his manner has therefore been studied and imitated by innumerable painters, because he shed on art a light of grace so pleasing, that his works will always be held in great price, and himself honoured by all students of design. Would to God that he had always pursued the studies of painting, and had not sought to pry into the secrets of congealing mercury in order to become richer than Nature and Heaven had made him; for then he would have been without an equal, and truly unique in the art of painting, whereas, by searching for that which he could never find, he wasted his time, wronged his art, and did harm to his own life and fame.
Among the many people from Lombardy who have been blessed with the gift of design, a strong inventive spirit, and a unique talent for creating beautiful landscapes in their artwork, we should consider Francesco Mazzuoli of Parma to be unmatched and even superior to all others. He was generously endowed by Heaven with everything needed to be a great painter, giving his figures a nobility, sweetness, and grace in their poses that were distinctly his own. It’s clear that he paid careful attention to his heads as well, and because of this, countless artists have studied and tried to replicate his style. He brought a light of grace to art that is so appealing that his works will always be highly valued, and he will be revered by all who study design. If only he had always focused on painting and not sought the secrets of solidifying mercury to become wealthier than nature and Heaven made him; then he would have been unrivaled and truly exceptional in painting. Instead, by pursuing something he could never achieve, he wasted his time, compromised his art, and harmed both his life and reputation.
Francesco was born at Parma in the year 1504, and because he lost his father when he was still a child of tender age, he was left to the care of two uncles, brothers of his father, and both painters, who brought him up with the greatest lovingness, teaching him all those praiseworthy ways that befit a Christian man and a good citizen. Then, having made some little growth, he had no sooner taken pen in hand in order to learn [Pg 244] to write, than he began, spurred by Nature, who had consecrated him at his birth to design, to draw most marvellous things; and the master who was teaching him to write, noticing this and perceiving to what heights the genius of the boy might in time attain, persuaded his uncles to let him give his attention to design and painting. Whereupon, being men of good judgment in matters of art, although they were old and painters of no great fame, and recognizing that God and Nature had been the boy's first masters, they did not fail to take the greatest pains to make him learn to draw under the discipline of the best masters, to the end that he might acquire a good manner. And coming by degrees to believe that he had been born, so to speak, with brushes in his fingers, on the one hand they urged him on, and on the other, fearing lest overmuch study might perchance spoil his health, they would sometimes hold him back. Finally, having come to the age of sixteen, and having already done miracles of drawing, he painted a S. John baptizing Christ, of his own invention, on a panel, which he executed in such a manner that even now whoever sees it stands marvelling that such a work should have been painted so well by a boy. This picture was placed in the Nunziata, the seat of the Frati de' Zoccoli at Parma. Not content with this, however, Francesco resolved to try his hand at working in fresco, and therefore painted a chapel in S. Giovanni Evangelista, a house of Black Friars of S. Benedict; and since he succeeded in that kind of work, he painted as many as seven.
Francesco was born in Parma in 1504, and after losing his father at a young age, he was raised by his two uncles, who were both painters. They cared for him lovingly and taught him the values of being a good Christian and citizen. As he grew, he picked up a pen to learn how to write, but his natural talent for drawing quickly emerged. His writing teacher noticed his artistic potential and convinced his uncles to let him focus on drawing and painting. Although his uncles were older and not very famous, they had a good sense of art and recognized that God and Nature had been the boy's first teachers. They took great care to help him learn to draw under the best masters so he could develop his skills properly. They encouraged him, believing he was born to be an artist, but also worried that too much study might harm his health, so they sometimes held him back. By the age of sixteen, having already achieved impressive drawing skills, he created a painting of St. John baptizing Christ, entirely from his imagination, on a panel. It was so well done that even today, anyone who views it marvels at how such a remarkable piece was created by a boy. This painting was displayed at the Nunziata, home of the Frati de' Zoccoli in Parma. Not satisfied with just that, Francesco decided to try fresco painting and painted a chapel in St. Giovanni Evangelista, a Black Friars’ house of St. Benedict; he succeeded so well that he went on to paint seven more.
But about that time Pope Leo X sent Signor Prospero Colonna with an army to Parma, and the uncles of Francesco, fearing that he might perchance lose time or be distracted, sent him in company with his cousin, Girolamo Mazzuoli, another boy-painter, to Viadana, a place belonging to the Duke of Mantua, where they lived all the time that the war lasted; and there Francesco painted two panels in distemper. One of these, in which are S. Francis receiving the Stigmata, and S. Chiara, was placed in the Church of the Frati de' Zoccoli; and the other, which contains a Marriage of S. Catharine, with many figures, was placed in S. Piero. And let no one believe that these are works of a young beginner, for they seem to be rather by the hand of a full-grown master.
But around that time, Pope Leo X sent Signor Prospero Colonna with an army to Parma. Francesco's uncles, worried that he might lose focus or waste time, sent him along with his cousin, Girolamo Mazzuoli, another young painter, to Viadana, a place owned by the Duke of Mantua, where they stayed for the duration of the war. There, Francesco painted two panels in distemper. One of these features St. Francis receiving the Stigmata and St. Chiara, and it was placed in the Church of the Frati de' Zoccoli. The other, which depicts the Marriage of St. Catherine with many figures, was placed in St. Piero. And don't let anyone think these are the works of a beginner; they seem to be created by a seasoned master.
[Pg 245] The war finished, Francesco, having returned with his cousin to Parma, first completed some pictures that he had left unfinished at his departure, which are in the hands of various people. After this he painted a panel-picture in oils of Our Lady with the Child in her arms, with S. Jerome on one side and the Blessed Bernardino da Feltro on the other, and in the head of one of these figures he made a portrait of the patron of the picture, which is so wonderful that it lacks nothing save the breath of life. All these works he executed before he had reached the age of nineteen.
[Pg 245] The war ended, and Francesco, having returned to Parma with his cousin, first finished some paintings he had left incomplete before he left, which are with various people now. After that, he created an oil painting of Our Lady holding the Child, with St. Jerome on one side and Blessed Bernardino da Feltro on the other. In the head of one of these figures, he included a portrait of the patron of the painting, which is so amazing that it’s almost lifelike. He completed all these works before turning nineteen.
Then, having conceived a desire to see Rome, like one who was on the path of progress and heard much praise given to the works of good masters, and particularly to those of Raffaello and Michelagnolo, he spoke out his mind and desire to his old uncles, who, thinking that such a wish was not otherwise than worthy of praise, said that they were content that he should go, but that it would be well for him to take with him some work by his own hand, which might serve to introduce him to the noblemen of that city and to the craftsmen of his profession. This advice was not displeasing to Francesco, and he painted three pictures, two small and one of some size, representing in the last the Child in the arms of the Madonna, taking some fruits from the lap of an Angel, and an old man with his arms covered with hair, executed with art and judgment, and pleasing in colour. Besides this, in order to investigate the subtleties of art, he set himself one day to make his own portrait, looking at himself in a convex barber's mirror. And in doing this, perceiving the bizarre effects produced by the roundness of the mirror, which twists the beams of a ceiling into strange curves, and makes the doors and other parts of buildings recede in an extraordinary manner, the idea came to him to amuse himself by counterfeiting everything. Thereupon he had a ball of wood made by a turner, and, dividing it in half so as to make it the same in size and shape as the mirror, set to work to counterfeit on it with supreme art all that he saw in the glass, and particularly his own self, which he did with such lifelike reality as could not be imagined or believed. Now everything that is near the mirror is magnified, and all that is at a distance is diminished, and thus he made the hand engaged in [Pg 246] drawing somewhat large, as the mirror showed it, and so marvellous that it seemed to be his very own. And since Francesco had an air of great beauty, with a face and aspect full of grace, in the likeness rather of an angel than of a man, his image on that ball had the appearance of a thing divine. So happily, indeed, did he succeed in the whole of this work, that the painting was no less real than the reality, and in it were seen the lustre of the glass, the reflection of every detail, and the lights and shadows, all so true and natural, that nothing more could have been looked for from the brain of man.
Then, fueled by a desire to see Rome, like someone on a journey of growth who has heard a lot of praise for the works of great masters—especially Raffaello and Michelangelo—he shared his thoughts and aspirations with his elderly uncles. They believed this wish was commendable and agreed he should go. They suggested he take along some of his own work to help introduce him to the city's nobles and fellow craftsmen. Francesco found this advice agreeable, so he painted three pieces: two small ones and one larger one depicting the Child in the arms of the Madonna, receiving fruits from an angel’s lap, along with an old man with hairy arms, executed with skill and pleasing colors. Additionally, to explore the subtleties of art, one day he decided to create his own portrait using a convex barber's mirror. While doing this, he observed the strange effects created by the mirror's roundness, which distorted the beams of the ceiling into odd curves and made doors and other architectural elements recede in unusual ways. This inspired him to recreate everything in a playful way. He had a wooden ball made by a turner, cut it in half to match the mirror's size and shape, and then began to replicate on it with remarkable skill everything he saw in the glass, especially his own reflection, achieving a lifelike quality that was almost unbelievable. He noticed that everything near the mirror appeared larger, while distant objects looked smaller, so he made the hand engaged in [Pg 246] drawing appear somewhat large, just as the mirror showed it, creating a marvel that seemed truly his own. Since Francesco had a strikingly beautiful appearance, with a face and demeanor that resembled an angel more than a man, his image on the ball looked almost divine. He succeeded so well in this entire work that the painting was as real as reality itself, showing the shine of the glass, the reflection of every detail, and the interplay of light and shadow—all so true and natural that nothing more could have been expected from the mind of man.

THE MARRIAGE OF S. CATHARINE
(After the painting by Francesco Mazzuoli [Parmigiano].
Parma:
Gallery, 192)
Anderson
View larger image
THE MARRIAGE OF S. CATHARINE
(After the painting by Francesco Mazzuoli [Parmigiano].
Parma:
Gallery, 192)
Anderson
View larger image
Having finished these works, which were held by his old uncles to be out of the ordinary, and even considered by many other good judges of art to be miracles of beauty, and having packed up both pictures and portrait, he made his way to Rome, accompanied by one of the uncles. There, after the Datary had seen the pictures and appraised them at their true worth, the young man and his uncle were straightway introduced to Pope Clement, who, seeing the works and the youthfulness of Francesco, was struck with astonishment, and with him all his Court. And afterwards his Holiness, having first shown him much favour, said that he wished to commission him to paint the Hall of the Popes, in which Giovanni da Udine had already decorated all the ceiling with stucco-work and painting. And so, after presenting his pictures to the Pope, and receiving various gifts and marks of favour in addition to his promises, Francesco, spurred by the praise and glory that he heard bestowed upon him, and by the hope of the profit that he might expect from so great a Pontiff, painted a most beautiful picture of the Circumcision, which was held to be extraordinary in invention on account of three most fanciful lights that shone in the work; for the first figures were illuminated by the radiance of the countenance of Christ, the second received their light from others who were walking up some steps with burning torches in their hands, bringing offerings for the sacrifice, and the last were revealed and illuminated by the light of the dawn, which played upon a most lovely landscape with a vast number of buildings. This picture finished, he presented it to the Pope, who did not do with it what he had done with the others; for he had given the picture of Our Lady [Pg 247] to Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, his nephew, and the mirror-portrait to Messer Pietro Aretino, the poet, who was in his service, but the picture of the Circumcision he kept for himself; and it is believed that it came in time into the possession of the Emperor. The mirror-portrait I remember to have seen, when quite a young man, in the house of the same Messer Pietro Aretino at Arezzo, where it was sought out as a choice work by the strangers passing through that city. Afterwards it fell, I know not how, into the hands of Valerio Vicentino, the crystal-engraver, and it is now in the possession of Alessandro Vittoria, a sculptor in Venice, the disciple of Jacopo Sansovino.
Having finished these works, which his old uncles considered unusual and many other respected art critics viewed as masterpieces, he packed up both paintings and portraits and made his way to Rome with one of his uncles. There, after the Datary evaluated the paintings and recognized their true value, the young man and his uncle were quickly introduced to Pope Clement. Upon seeing the artworks and the youth of Francesco, both the Pope and his Court were amazed. Afterwards, His Holiness, having shown him great favor, expressed his wish to commission him to paint the Hall of the Popes, where Giovanni da Udine had already decorated the ceiling with stucco and paintings. So, after presenting his paintings to the Pope and receiving various gifts and tokens of appreciation along with promises, Francesco, inspired by the praise and recognition he received and the potential profits from such a prominent Pontiff, painted a stunning piece of the Circumcision. It was considered extraordinary for its inventive use of three imaginative light sources: the first figures were illuminated by the radiance of Christ's face, the second received their light from people walking up steps holding burning torches as they brought offerings for the sacrifice, and the last were illuminated by the dawn's light, revealing a beautiful landscape filled with numerous buildings. Once finished, he presented this painting to the Pope, who kept it for himself, unlike the others he had given away—like the picture of Our Lady [Pg 247] to his nephew Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, and the mirror portrait to Messer Pietro Aretino, the poet in his service. It is believed that the Circumcision painting eventually came into the possession of the Emperor. I recall seeing the mirror portrait when I was quite young, in the house of the same Messer Pietro Aretino in Arezzo, where it was sought after by visitors to the city. Later, it somehow ended up with Valerio Vicentino, the crystal engraver, and is now owned by Alessandro Vittoria, a sculptor in Venice and a disciple of Jacopo Sansovino.
But to return to Francesco; while studying in Rome, he set himself to examine all the ancient and modern works, both of sculpture and of painting, that were in that city, but held those of Michelagnolo Buonarroti and Raffaello da Urbino in supreme veneration beyond all the others; and it was said afterwards that the spirit of that Raffaello had passed into the body of Francesco, when men saw how excellent the young man was in art, and how gentle and gracious in his ways, as was Raffaello, and above all when it became known how much Francesco strove to imitate him in everything, and particularly in painting. Nor was this study in vain, for many little pictures that he painted in Rome, the greater part of which afterwards came into the hands of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, were truly marvellous; and even such is a round picture with a very beautiful Annunciation, executed by him for Messer Agnolo Cesis, which is now treasured as a rare work in the house of that family. He painted a picture, likewise, of the Madonna with Christ, some Angels, and a S. Joseph, which are beautiful to a marvel on account of the expressions of the heads, the colouring, and the grace and diligence with which they are seen to have been executed. This work was formerly in the possession of Luigi Gaddi, and it must now be in the hands of his heirs.
But to go back to Francesco; while studying in Rome, he dedicated himself to examining all the ancient and modern works of sculpture and painting in the city, but he held the works of Michelangelo Buonarroti and Raphael of Urbino in the highest regard above all others. It was said afterward that the spirit of Raphael had passed into Francesco’s body when people saw how skilled the young man was in art and how gentle and gracious he was, just like Raphael. This was especially true when it became known how much Francesco tried to imitate him in everything, particularly in painting. This study was not in vain, as many small paintings he created in Rome, most of which later came into the possession of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, were truly remarkable. One such piece is a round painting featuring a beautiful Annunciation that he made for Messer Agnolo Cesis, now cherished as a rare work in that family’s home. He also painted a picture of the Madonna with Christ, some Angels, and St. Joseph, which are stunning due to the expressions on the faces, the coloring, and the grace and care evident in their execution. This work was previously owned by Luigi Gaddi and must now belong to his heirs.
Hearing the fame of this master, Signor Lorenzo Cibo, Captain of the Papal Guard, and a very handsome man, had a portrait of himself painted by Francesco, who may be said to have made, not a portrait, but a living figure of flesh and blood. Having then been commissioned to paint for [Pg 248] Madonna Maria Bufolini of Città di Castello a panel-picture which was to be placed in S. Salvatore del Lauro, in a chapel near the door, Francesco painted in it a Madonna in the sky, who is reading and has the Child between her knees, and on the earth he made a figure of S. John, kneeling on one knee in an attitude of extraordinary beauty, turning his body, and pointing to the Infant Christ; and lying asleep on the ground, in foreshortening, is a S. Jerome in Penitence.
Hearing about the fame of this master, Signor Lorenzo Cibo, Captain of the Papal Guard, and a very handsome man, had a portrait of himself painted by Francesco, who created not just a portrait, but a living figure of flesh and blood. He was then commissioned to paint for [Pg 248] Madonna Maria Bufolini of Città di Castello a panel picture that was to be placed in S. Salvatore del Lauro, in a chapel near the door. In it, Francesco painted a Madonna in the sky, who is reading and has the Child between her knees. On the ground, he depicted a figure of St. John, kneeling on one knee in an extraordinary posture, turning his body, and pointing to the Infant Christ; lying asleep on the ground, in foreshortening, is St. Jerome in Penitence.
But he was prevented from bringing this work to completion by the ruin and sack of Rome in 1527, which was the reason not only that the arts were banished for a time, but also that many craftsmen lost their lives. And Francesco, also, came within a hair's breadth of losing his, seeing that at the beginning of the sack he was so intent on his work, that, when the soldiers were entering the houses, and some Germans were already in his, he did not move from his painting for all the uproar that they were making; but when they came upon him and saw him working, they were so struck with astonishment at the work, that, like the gentlemen that they must have been, they let him go on. And thus, while the impious cruelty of those barbarous hordes was ruining the unhappy city and all its treasures, both sacred and profane, without showing respect to either God or man, Francesco was provided for and greatly honoured by those Germans, and protected from all injury. All the hardship that he suffered at that time was this, that he was forced, one of them being a great lover of painting, to make a vast number of drawings in water-colours and with the pen, which formed the payment of his ransom. But afterwards, when these soldiers changed their quarters, Francesco nearly came to an evil end, because, going to look for some friends, he was made prisoner by other soldiers and compelled to pay as ransom some few crowns that he possessed. Wherefore his uncle, grieved by that and by the fact that this disaster had robbed Francesco of his hopes of acquiring knowledge, honour, and profit, and seeing Rome almost wholly in ruins and the Pope the prisoner of the Spaniards, determined to take him back to Parma. And so he set Francesco on his way to his native city, but himself remained for some days in Rome, where he deposited the panel-picture painted for Madonna Maria Bufolini with the Friars of the [Pg 249] Pace, in whose refectory it remained for many years, until finally it was taken by Messer Giulio Bufolini to the church of his family in Città di Castello.
But he was stopped from finishing this work by the destruction and looting of Rome in 1527, which caused the arts to be pushed aside for a while and led to many craftsmen losing their lives. Francesco also came very close to losing his own life, as at the start of the looting, he was so focused on his painting that when the soldiers were entering the houses, and some Germans were already in his, he didn't stop for all the chaos around him; but when they found him and saw him working, they were so amazed by his work that, being the gentlemen they were, they let him continue. So, while the vicious cruelty of those barbaric groups was destroying the unfortunate city and all its treasures, both sacred and profane, without any respect for God or man, Francesco was taken care of and highly honored by those Germans, and was protected from harm. The only hardship he faced during that time was that one of the soldiers, a big fan of painting, forced him to create a large number of drawings in watercolors and with pen, which served as his ransom payment. However, after these soldiers moved to a different location, Francesco nearly faced a dire fate when, looking for some friends, he was captured by other soldiers and made to pay a few crowns that he had as ransom. Therefore, his uncle, saddened by this and by the fact that this disaster had taken away Francesco's dreams of gaining knowledge, honor, and profit, and seeing Rome almost entirely in ruins with the Pope imprisoned by the Spaniards, decided to take him back to Parma. So, he sent Francesco on his way back to his hometown, but remained in Rome for several days, where he left the panel painting he had done for Madonna Maria Bufolini with the Friars of the [Pg 249] Pace, which stayed in their dining room for many years until it was eventually taken by Messer Giulio Bufolini to his family's church in Città di Castello.
Having arrived in Bologna, and finding entertainment with many friends, and particularly in the house of his most intimate friend, a saddler of Parma, Francesco stayed some months in that city, where the life pleased him, during which time he had some works engraved and printed in chiaroscuro, among others the Beheading of S. Peter and S. Paul, and a large figure of Diogenes. He also prepared many others, in order to have them engraved on copper and printed, having with him for this purpose one Maestro Antonio da Trento; but he did not carry this intention into effect at the time, because he was forced to set his hand to executing many pictures and other works for gentlemen of Bologna. The first picture by his hand that was seen at Bologna was a S. Rocco of great size in the Chapel of the Monsignori in S. Petronio; to which Saint he gave a marvellous aspect, making him very beautiful in every part, and conceiving him as somewhat relieved from the pain that the plague-sore in the thigh gave him, which he shows by looking with uplifted head towards Heaven in the act of thanking God, as good men do in spite of the adversities that fall upon them. This work he executed for one Fabrizio da Milano, of whom he painted a portrait from the waist upwards in the picture, with the hands clasped, which seems to be alive; and equally real, also, seems a dog that is there, with some landscapes which are very beautiful, Francesco being particularly excellent in this respect.
After arriving in Bologna and enjoying the company of many friends, especially at the home of his close friend, a saddler from Parma, Francesco stayed in the city for several months, enjoying the vibrant lifestyle. During this time, he had some works engraved and printed in chiaroscuro, including the Beheading of St. Peter and St. Paul, as well as a large figure of Diogenes. He also prepared several other pieces to be engraved on copper and printed, for which he had Maestro Antonio da Trento assisting him. However, he couldn't pursue this plan at that moment because he had to focus on creating various paintings and other works for the gentlemen of Bologna. The first painting by him displayed in Bologna was a large St. Rocco located in the Chapel of the Monsignori in St. Petronio. He gave this saint a remarkable appearance, portraying him as very beautiful, and depicting him somewhat relieved from the pain caused by the plague sore on his thigh. This is shown by St. Rocco looking up toward Heaven, in the act of thanking God, as good people do despite the challenges they face. He created this work for Fabrizio da Milano, of whom he painted a portrait from the waist up in the artwork, with his hands clasped, making him appear lifelike. A dog in the painting also seems very real, alongside some beautiful landscapes, showcasing Francesco's particular excellence in this area.
He then painted for Albio, a physician of Parma, a Conversion of S. Paul, with many figures and a landscape, which was a very choice work. And for his friend the saddler he executed another picture of extraordinary beauty, containing a Madonna turned to one side in a lovely attitude, and several other figures. He also painted a picture for Count Giorgio Manzuoli, and two canvases in gouache, with some little figures, all graceful and well executed, for Maestro Luca dai Leuti.
He then painted a "Conversion of St. Paul" for Albio, a doctor from Parma, featuring many figures and a landscape, which was an exceptional piece. For his friend, the saddler, he created another stunning painting, showing a Madonna turned to the side in a beautiful pose, along with several other figures. He also painted a piece for Count Giorgio Manzuoli, as well as two gouache canvases with small, graceful figures, all well done, for Maestro Luca dai Leuti.
One morning about this time, while Francesco was still in bed, the aforesaid Antonio da Trento, who was living with him as his engraver, [Pg 250] opened a strong-box and robbed him of all the copper-plate engravings, woodcuts, and drawings that he possessed; and he must have gone off to the Devil, for all the news that was ever heard of him. The engravings and woodcuts, indeed, Francesco recovered, for Antonio had left them with a friend in Bologna, perchance with the intention of reclaiming them at his convenience; but the drawings he was never able to get back. Driven almost out of his mind by this, he returned to his painting, and made a portrait, for the sake of money, of I know not what Count of Bologna. After that he painted a picture of Our Lady, with a Christ who is holding a globe of the world. The Madonna has a most beautiful expression, and the Child is also very natural; for he always gave to the faces of children a vivacious and truly childlike air, which yet reveals that subtle and mischievous spirit that children often have. And he attired the Madonna in a very unusual fashion, clothing her in a garment that had sleeves of yellowish gauze, striped, as it were, with gold, which gave a truly beautiful and graceful effect, revealing the flesh in a natural and delicate manner; besides which, the hair is painted so well that there is none better to be seen. This picture was painted for Messer Pietro Aretino, but Francesco gave it to Pope Clement, who came to Bologna at that time; then, in some way of which I know nothing, it fell into the hands of Messer Dionigi Gianni, and it now belongs to his son, Messer Bartolommeo, who has been so accommodating with it that it has been copied fifty times, so much is it prized.
One morning around this time, while Francesco was still in bed, the aforementioned Antonio da Trento, who lived with him as his engraver, [Pg 250] opened a strongbox and stole all of his copper-plate engravings, woodcuts, and drawings; and he must have gone to ground, because no one ever heard from him again. Francesco did manage to recover the engravings and woodcuts, as Antonio had left them with a friend in Bologna, perhaps intending to get them back when it suited him; but he could never reclaim the drawings. Driven nearly mad by this, he returned to painting and created a portrait for money of some Count of Bologna I can’t name. After that, he painted an image of Our Lady with Christ holding a globe of the world. The Madonna has a truly beautiful expression, and the Child is also very lifelike; he always gave the faces of children a lively and genuinely childlike quality that also hints at the subtle and mischievous spirit children often display. He dressed the Madonna in a very unusual way, adorning her in a garment with yellowish gauze sleeves, striped with gold, which created a stunning and elegant effect, showcasing the flesh in a natural and delicate manner; additionally, the hair is painted so well that it’s among the finest seen. This painting was originally for Messer Pietro Aretino, but Francesco gave it to Pope Clement when he visited Bologna at that time; then, through means I know nothing about, it ended up with Messer Dionigi Gianni, and now it belongs to his son, Messer Bartolommeo, who has been so generous with it that it has been copied fifty times, such is its value.

MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Francesco Mazzuoli [Parmigiano].
Bologna: Accademia, 116)
Brogi
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the panel by Francesco Mazzuoli [Parmigiano].
Bologna: Accademia, 116)
Brogi
View larger image
The same master painted for the Nuns of S. Margherita, in Bologna, a panel-picture containing a Madonna, S. Margaret, S. Petronio, S. Jerome, and S. Michael, which is held in vast veneration, as it deserves, since in the expressions of the heads and in every other part it is as fine as all the other works of this painter. He made many drawings, likewise, and in particular some for Girolamo del Lino, and some for Girolamo Fagiuoli, a goldsmith and engraver, who desired them for engraving on copper; and these drawings are held to be full of grace. For Bonifazio Gozzadino he painted his portrait from life, with one of his wife, which remained unfinished. He also began a picture of Our Lady, which was afterwards sold in Bologna to Giorgio Vasari of Arezzo, who has it in the new house [Pg 251] built by himself at Arezzo, together with many other noble pictures, works of sculpture, and ancient marbles.
The same master created a panel painting for the Nuns of S. Margherita in Bologna, featuring a Madonna, S. Margaret, S. Petronio, S. Jerome, and S. Michael. This artwork is greatly revered, and rightly so, as the expressions of the faces and all the other details are as exquisite as his other paintings. He also produced many drawings, particularly some for Girolamo del Lino and some for Girolamo Fagiuoli, a goldsmith and engraver, who wanted them for copper engravings; these drawings are considered very graceful. For Bonifazio Gozzadino, he painted a portrait from life that included a portrait of his wife, which he left unfinished. He also started a painting of Our Lady, which was later sold in Bologna to Giorgio Vasari from Arezzo, who has it in the new house [Pg 251] that he built in Arezzo, along with many other esteemed paintings, sculptures, and ancient marbles.
When the Emperor Charles V was at Bologna to be crowned by Clement VII, Francesco, who went several times to see him at table, but without drawing his portrait, made a likeness of that Emperor in a very large picture in oils, wherein he painted Fame crowning him with laurel, and a boy in the form of a little Hercules offering him a globe of the world, giving him, as it were, the dominion over it. This work, when finished, he showed to Pope Clement, who was so pleased with it that he sent it and Francesco together, accompanied by the Bishop of Vasona, then Datary, to the Emperor; at which his Majesty, to whom it gave much satisfaction, hinted that it should be left with him. But Francesco, being ill advised by an insincere or injudicious friend, refused to leave it, saying that it was not finished; and so his Majesty did not have it, and Francesco was not rewarded for it, as he certainly would have been. This picture, having afterwards fallen into the hands of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, was presented by him to the Cardinal of Mantua; and it is now in the guardaroba of the Duke of that city, with many other most noble and beautiful pictures.
When Emperor Charles V was in Bologna to be crowned by Clement VII, Francesco visited him several times at meals, but without drawing his portrait. He created a large oil painting of the Emperor, depicting Fame crowning him with a laurel wreath and a boy resembling a young Hercules offering him a globe of the world, symbolizing his dominion over it. When the work was completed, he showed it to Pope Clement, who was so pleased that he sent both the painting and Francesco, accompanied by the Bishop of Vasona, then Datary, to the Emperor. His Majesty was very satisfied with it and suggested that it should remain with him. However, Francesco, poorly advised by an insincere or thoughtless friend, refused to leave it, claiming it was unfinished. As a result, the Emperor did not receive it, and Francesco missed out on the reward he would have certainly earned. This painting later came into the possession of Cardinal Ippolito de' Medici, who presented it to the Cardinal of Mantua, and it is currently in the guardaroba of the Duke of that city, alongside many other remarkable and beautiful paintings.
After having been so many years out of his native place, as we have related, during which he had gained much experience in art, without accumulating any store of riches, but only of friends, Francesco, in order to satisfy his many friends and relatives, finally returned to Parma. Arriving there, he was straightway commissioned to paint in fresco a vault of some size in the Church of S. Maria della Steccata; but since in front of that vault there was a flat arch which followed the curve of the vaulting, making a sort of façade, he set to work first on the arch, as being the easier, and painted therein six very beautiful figures, two in colour and four in chiaroscuro. Between one figure and another he made some most beautiful ornaments, surrounding certain rosettes in relief, which he took it into his head to execute by himself in copper, taking extraordinary pains over them.
After being away from his hometown for so many years, as we've mentioned, during which he gained a lot of experience in art but didn't accumulate any wealth, only friends, Francesco finally returned to Parma to please his many friends and relatives. Upon his arrival, he was immediately commissioned to create a fresco on a large vault in the Church of S. Maria della Steccata. However, since there was a flat arch in front of that vault that followed its curve, creating a kind of façade, he decided to start with the arch first, as it was easier. He painted six beautiful figures there, two in color and four in chiaroscuro. Between the figures, he added beautiful ornaments, surrounding some raised rosettes, which he took it upon himself to create in copper, putting in a lot of effort.
At this same time he painted for the Chevalier Baiardo, a gentleman of Parma and his intimate friend, a picture of a Cupid, who is fashioning [Pg 252] a bow with his own hand, and at his feet are seated two little boys, one of whom catches the other by the arm and laughingly urges him to touch Cupid with his finger, but he will not touch him, and shows by his tears that he is afraid of burning himself at the fire of Love. This picture, which is charming in colour, ingenious in invention, and executed in that graceful manner of Francesco's that has been much studied and imitated, as it still is, by craftsmen and by all who delight in art, is now in the study of Signor Marc' Antonio Cavalca, heir to the Chevalier Baiardo, together with many drawings of every kind by the hand of the same master, all most beautiful and highly finished, which he has collected. Even such are the many drawings, also by the hand of Francesco, that are in our book; and particularly that of the Beheading of S. Peter and S. Paul, of which, as has been related, he published copper-plate engravings and woodcuts, while living in Bologna. For the Church of S. Maria de' Servi he painted a panel-picture of Our Lady with the Child asleep in her arms, and on one side some Angels, one of whom has in his arms an urn of crystal, wherein there glitters a Cross, at which the Madonna gazes in contemplation. This work remained unfinished, because he was not well contented with it; and yet it is much extolled, and a good example of his manner, so full of grace and beauty.
At the same time, he painted a picture of Cupid for the Chevalier Baiardo, a gentleman from Parma and his close friend. In the painting, Cupid is making a bow with his own hands, while at his feet are two little boys. One boy grabs the other by the arm, laughing and encouraging him to touch Cupid, but the boy is too scared to do it and shows he’s afraid of getting burned by the fire of Love through his tears. This picture, which is stunning in color, clever in concept, and executed in the graceful style that Francesco is known for—which many craftsmen and art lovers still study and imitate today—is now in the study of Signor Marc' Antonio Cavalca, the heir to Chevalier Baiardo, along with many beautiful and finely finished drawings by the same master that he has collected. There are also many drawings by Francesco in our book, particularly one of the Beheading of S. Peter and S. Paul, for which he published engravings and woodcuts while living in Bologna. For the Church of S. Maria de' Servi, he painted a panel of Our Lady holding the Child asleep in her arms, with some Angels beside her, one of whom holds a crystal urn containing a glittering Cross that the Madonna gazes at in contemplation. This work remained unfinished because he wasn't fully satisfied with it; yet, it is highly praised and serves as a great example of his style, full of grace and beauty.
Meanwhile Francesco began to abandon the work of the Steccata, or at least to carry it on so slowly that it was evident that he was not in earnest. And this happened because he had begun to study the problems of alchemy, and had quite deserted his profession of painting, thinking that he would become rich quicker by congealing mercury. Wherefore, wearing out his brain, but not in imagining beautiful inventions and executing them with brushes and colour-mixtures, he wasted his whole time in handling charcoal, wood, glass vessels, and other suchlike trumperies, which made him spend more in one day than he earned by a week's work at the Chapel of the Steccata. Having no other means of livelihood, and being yet compelled to live, he was wasting himself away little by little with those furnaces; and what was worse, the men of the Company of the Steccata, perceiving that he had completely [Pg 253] abandoned the work, and having perchance paid him more than his due, as is often done, brought a suit against him. Thereupon, thinking it better to withdraw, he fled by night with some friends to Casal Maggiore. And there, having dispersed a little of the alchemy out of his head, he painted a panel-picture for the Church of S. Stefano, of Our Lady in the sky, with S. John the Baptist and S. Stephen below. Afterwards he executed a picture, the last that he ever painted, of the Roman Lucretia, which was a thing divine and one of the best that were ever seen by his hand; but it has disappeared, however that may have happened, so that no one knows where it is.
Meanwhile, Francesco started to neglect the work at the Steccata, or at least to do it so slowly that it was clear he wasn’t serious about it. This change happened because he began studying alchemy and completely abandoned painting, convinced he could get rich faster by solidifying mercury. As a result, instead of using his creativity to come up with beautiful inventions and execute them with paints and brushes, he wasted all his time messing around with charcoal, wood, glass containers, and other trivial items, which caused him to spend more in one day than he earned in an entire week working at the Chapel of the Steccata. With no other source of income and still needing to survive, he was slowly wearing himself down with those furnaces; worse still, the men from the Company of the Steccata noticed that he had entirely [Pg 253] abandoned his work, and, having possibly overpaid him, as often happens, they filed a lawsuit against him. So, thinking it was better to escape, he fled at night with some friends to Casal Maggiore. There, after clearing some of the alchemy from his mind, he painted a panel for the Church of S. Stefano, depicting Our Lady in the sky with S. John the Baptist and S. Stephen below. Later, he created a painting, the last he ever did, of the Roman Lucretia, which was divine and one of the best pieces he ever made; unfortunately, it has vanished, and no one knows its whereabouts.
By his hand, also, is a picture of some nymphs, which is now in the house of Messer Niccolò Bufolini at Città di Castello, and a child's cradle, which was painted for Signora Angiola de' Rossi of Parma, wife of Signor Alessandro Vitelli, and is likewise at Città di Castello.
By his hand, there's also a painting of some nymphs, which is now in the home of Messer Niccolò Bufolini in Città di Castello, and a child's cradle, which was painted for Signora Angiola de' Rossi of Parma, the wife of Signor Alessandro Vitelli, and is also in Città di Castello.
In the end, having his mind still set on his alchemy, like every other man who has once grown crazed over it, and changing from a dainty and gentle person into an almost savage man with long and unkempt beard and locks, a creature quite different from his other self, Francesco went from bad to worse, became melancholy and eccentric, and was assailed by a grievous fever and a cruel flux, which in a few days caused him to pass to a better life. And in this way he found an end to the troubles of this world, which was never known to him save as a place full of annoyances and cares. He wished to be laid to rest in the Church of the Servite Friars, called La Fontana, one mile distant from Casal Maggiore; and he was buried naked, as he had directed, with a cross of cypress upright on his breast. He finished the course of his life on the 24th of August, in the year 1540, to the great loss of art on account of the singular grace that his hands gave to the pictures that he painted.
In the end, with his mind still focused on his alchemy, like every other person who has become obsessed with it, Francesco transformed from a delicate and kind individual into a nearly wild man with a long, unkempt beard and hair, becoming someone entirely different from his former self. He fell deeper into despair, becoming melancholic and eccentric, and was struck by a severe fever and a painful illness, which quickly led him to a better life. Thus, he ended the struggles of this world, which he always saw as a place filled with annoyances and worries. He wanted to be laid to rest in the Church of the Servite Friars, known as La Fontana, one mile from Casal Maggiore; and he was buried without clothes, as he had requested, with a cypress cross placed upright on his chest. He completed his life on August 24, in the year 1540, to the significant loss of art because of the unique grace that his hands brought to the paintings he created.
Francesco delighted to play on the lute, and had a hand and a genius so well suited to it that he was no less excellent in this than in painting. It is certain that if he had not worked by caprice, and had laid aside the follies of the alchemists, he would have been without a doubt one of the rarest and most excellent painters of our age. I do not deny that working [Pg 254] at moments of fever-heat, and when one feels inclined, may be the best plan. But I do blame a man for working little or not at all, and for wasting all his time over cogitations, seeing that the wish to arrive by trickery at a goal to which one cannot attain, often brings it about that one loses what one knows in seeking after that which it is not given to us to know. If Francesco, who had from nature a spirit of great vivacity, with a beautiful and graceful manner, had persisted in working every day, little by little he would have made such proficience in art, that, even as he gave a beautiful, gracious, and most charming expression to his heads, so he would have surpassed his own self and the others in the solidity and perfect excellence of his drawing.
Francesco loved to play the lute and had both the talent and skill for it, making him just as remarkable in this as he was in painting. It's clear that if he hadn't acted on whims and had set aside the distractions of alchemy, he would undoubtedly have become one of the finest and most exceptional painters of our time. I don’t deny that working when inspiration strikes and when you feel like it can be effective. However, I think it’s wrong for someone to work very little or not at all and to waste all their time in thought, since trying to reach a goal through shortcuts often means losing what you already know while chasing the unknown. If Francesco, who naturally had a lively spirit and a beautiful, graceful style, had made a habit of working every day, he would have gradually improved so much in his art that, just as he gave a lovely, charming expression to his subjects, he would have far exceeded both himself and others in the strength and perfection of his drawing.
He left behind him his cousin Girolamo Mazzuoli, who, with great credit to himself, always imitated his manner, as is proved by the works by his hand that are in Parma. At Viadana, also, whither he fled with Francesco on account of the war, he painted, young as he was, a very beautiful Annunciation on a little panel for S. Francesco, a seat of the Frati de' Zoccoli; and he painted another for S. Maria ne' Borghi. For the Conventual Friars of S. Francis at Parma he executed the panel-picture of their high-altar, containing Joachim being driven from the Temple, with many figures. And for S. Alessandro, a convent of nuns in that city, he painted a panel with the Madonna in Heaven, the Infant Christ presenting a palm to S. Giustina, and some Angels drawing back a piece of drapery, with S. Alexander the Pope and S. Benedict. For the Church of the Carmelite Friars he painted the panel-picture of their high-altar, which is very beautiful, and for S. Sepolcro another panel-picture of some size. In S. Giovanni Evangelista, a church of nuns in the same city, are two panel-pictures by the hand of Girolamo, of no little beauty, but not equal to the doors of the organ or to the picture of the high-altar, in which is a most beautiful Transfiguration, executed with much diligence. The same master has painted a perspective-view in fresco in the refectory of those nuns, with a picture in oils of the Last Supper of Christ with the Apostles, and fresco-paintings in the Chapel of the High-Altar in the Duomo. And for Madama Margherita of Austria, Duchess of Parma, he has made a portrait of the Prince Don Alessandro, [Pg 255] her son, in full armour, with his sword over a globe of the world, and an armed figure of Parma kneeling before him.
He left behind his cousin Girolamo Mazzuoli, who, with great credit to himself, always emulated his style, as shown by the works he created in Parma. In Viadana, where he fled with Francesco due to the war, he painted a beautiful Annunciation on a small panel for S. Francesco, a place for the Frati de' Zoccoli; he also painted another for S. Maria ne' Borghi. For the Conventual Friars of S. Francis in Parma, he completed the panel picture for their high altar, depicting Joachim being driven from the Temple, along with many figures. Additionally, for S. Alessandro, a convent for nuns in that city, he created a panel featuring the Madonna in Heaven, the Infant Christ presenting a palm to S. Giustina, and some Angels pulling back a piece of drapery, with S. Alexander the Pope and S. Benedict. For the Church of the Carmelite Friars, he painted the panel picture for their high altar, which is very beautiful, and another panel picture for S. Sepolcro. In S. Giovanni Evangelista, a church for nuns in the same city, there are two panel pictures by Girolamo that are quite beautiful, though not as impressive as the organ doors or the picture on the high altar, which features a stunning Transfiguration, executed with great care. The same artist painted a perspective view in fresco in the refectory of those nuns, along with an oil painting of the Last Supper of Christ with the Apostles, and frescoes in the Chapel of the High Altar in the Duomo. For Madama Margherita of Austria, Duchess of Parma, he created a portrait of her son, Prince Don Alessandro, [Pg 255], fully armored, with his sword resting on a globe, and an armed figure of Parma kneeling before him.
In a chapel of the Steccata, at Parma, he has painted in fresco the Apostles receiving the Holy Spirit, and on an arch similar to that which his cousin Francesco painted he has executed six Sibyls, two in colour and four in chiaroscuro; while in a niche opposite to that arch he has painted the Nativity of Christ, with the Shepherds adoring Him, which is a very beautiful picture, although it was left not quite finished. For the high-altar of the Certosa, without Parma, he has painted a panel-picture with the three Magi; a panel for S. Piero, an abbey of Monks of S. Bernard, at Pavia; another for the Duomo of Mantua, at the commission of the Cardinal; and yet another panel for S. Giovanni in the same city, containing a Christ in a glory of light, surrounded by the Apostles, with S. John, of whom He appears to be saying, "Sic eum volo manere," etc.; while round this panel, in six large pictures, are the miracles of the same S. John the Evangelist.
In a chapel at the Steccata in Parma, he painted a fresco of the Apostles receiving the Holy Spirit. On an arch, similar to the one his cousin Francesco painted, he created six Sibyls—two in color and four in chiaroscuro. Across from that arch, he painted the Nativity of Christ, with the Shepherds adoring Him. It's a beautiful picture, even though it’s not entirely finished. For the high altar of the Certosa, just outside Parma, he painted a panel featuring the three Magi. He also created a panel for S. Piero, an abbey of the Monks of S. Bernard in Pavia; another for the Duomo of Mantua on commission from the Cardinal; and yet another panel for S. Giovanni in the same city, depicting Christ in a radiant glory surrounded by the Apostles, with S. John, to whom He seems to say, "This is how I want him to remain," etc. Surrounding this panel are six large pictures illustrating the miracles of S. John the Evangelist.
In the Church of the Frati Zoccolanti, on the left hand, there is a large panel-picture of the Conversion of S. Paul, a very beautiful work, by the hand of the same man. And for the high-altar of S. Benedetto in Pollirone, a place twelve miles distant from Mantua, he has executed a panel-picture of Christ in the Manger being adored by the Shepherds, with Angels singing. He has also painted—but I do not know exactly at what time—a most beautiful picture of five Loves, one of whom is sleeping, and the others are despoiling him, one taking away his bow, another his arrows, and the others his torch, which picture belongs to the Lord Duke Ottavio, who holds it in great account by reason of the excellence of Girolamo. This master has in no way fallen short of the standard of his cousin Francesco, being a fine painter, gentle and courteous beyond belief; and since he is still alive, there are seen issuing from his brush other works of rare beauty, which he has constantly in hand.
In the Church of the Frati Zoccolanti, on the left side, there's a large panel painting of the Conversion of St. Paul, a stunning piece by the same artist. For the high altar of St. Benedict in Pollirone, which is twelve miles from Mantua, he created a panel painting of Christ in the Manger being adored by the Shepherds, with Angels singing. He has also painted—though I'm not sure exactly when—a beautiful picture of five Loves, one of whom is sleeping while the others are taking his things: one is removing his bow, another his arrows, and others his torch. This painting belongs to Duke Ottavio, who values it highly because of Girolamo's excellence. This master has more than lived up to the standards set by his cousin Francesco, being a talented painter, exceptionally kind and courteous; and since he is still alive, we continue to see other works of rare beauty coming from his brush that he is always working on.
A close friend of the aforesaid Francesco Mazzuoli was Messer Vincenzio Caccianimici, a gentleman of Bologna, who painted and strove to the best of his power to imitate the manner of Francesco. This Vincenzio [Pg 256] was a very good colourist, so that the works which he executed for his own pleasure, or to present to his friends and various noblemen, are truly well worthy of praise; and such, in particular, is a panel-picture in oils, containing the Beheading of S. John the Baptist, which is in the chapel of his family in S. Petronio. This talented gentleman, by whose hand are some very beautiful drawings in our book, died in the year 1542.
A close friend of Francesco Mazzuoli was Vincenzio Caccianimici, a gentleman from Bologna, who painted and tried his best to imitate Francesco's style. Vincenzio [Pg 256] was a great colorist, so the works he created for his own enjoyment or to give as gifts to friends and various nobles are truly praiseworthy; one notable piece is an oil panel painting of the Beheading of St. John the Baptist, which is located in his family's chapel in St. Petronio. This talented artist, whose beautiful drawings are included in our book, passed away in 1542.
[Pg 257] JACOPO PALMA AND LORENZO LOTTO

LORENZO LOTTO: THE TRIUMPH OF CHASTITY
(Rome: Rospigliosi Gallery. Panel)
View larger image
LORENZO LOTTO: THE TRIUMPH OF CHASTITY
(Rome: Rospigliosi Gallery. Panel)
View larger image
[Pg 259] LIVES OF JACOPO PALMA
[PALMA VECCHIO]
AND LORENZO LOTTO
PAINTERS OF VENICE
So potent are mastery and excellence, even when seen in only one or two works executed to perfection by a man in the art that he practises, that, no matter how small these may be, craftsmen and judges of art are forced to extol them, and writers are compelled to celebrate them and to give praise to the craftsman who has made them; even as we are now about to do for the Venetian Palma. This master, although not very eminent, nor remarkable for perfection of painting, was nevertheless so careful and diligent, and subjected himself so zealously to the labours of art, that a certain proportion of his works, if not all, have something good in them, in that they are close imitations of life and of the natural appearance of men.
Mastery and excellence are so powerful that even just one or two perfectly executed works by an artist make craftsmen and art judges praise them, and writers feel compelled to celebrate both the works and the artist. This is exactly what we are about to do for the Venetian Palma. Though this master is not particularly famous or known for perfect painting, he was extremely careful and dedicated, immersing himself in the hard work of art. As a result, some, if not all, of his works possess certain qualities worth appreciating, as they closely mimic life and the natural look of people.

JACOPO PALMA (PALMA VECCHIO): S. BARBARA
(Venice: S. Maria Formosa. Panel)
View larger image
JACOPO PALMA (PALMA VECCHIO): S. BARBARA
(Venice: S. Maria Formosa. Panel)
View larger image
Palma was much more remarkable for his patience in harmonizing and blending colours than for boldness of design, and he handled colour with extraordinary grace and finish. This may be seen in Venice from many pictures and portraits that he executed for various gentlemen; but of these I shall say nothing more, since I propose to content myself with making mention of some altar-pieces and of a head that I hold to be marvellous, or rather, divine. One of the altar-pieces he painted for S. Antonio, near Castello, at Venice, and another for S. Elena, near the Lido, where the Monks of Monte Oliveto have their monastery. In the latter, which is on the high-altar of that church, he painted the Magi presenting their offerings to Christ, with a good number of figures, among which are some heads truly worthy of praise, as also are the draperies, [Pg 260] executed with a beautiful flow of folds, which cover the figures. Palma also painted a lifesize S. Barbara for the altar of the Bombardieri in the Church of S. Maria Formosa, with two smaller figures at the sides, S. Sebastian and S. Anthony; and the S. Barbara is one of the best figures that this painter ever executed. The same master also executed another altar-piece, in which is a Madonna in the sky, with S. John below, for the Church of S. Moisè, near the Piazza di S. Marco. In addition to this, Palma painted a most beautiful scene for the hall wherein the men of the Scuola of S. Marco assemble, on the Piazza di SS. Giovanni e Paolo, in emulation of those already executed by Giovanni Bellini, Giovanni Mansueti, and other painters. In this scene is depicted a ship which is bringing the body of S. Mark to Venice; and there may be seen counterfeited by Palma a terrible tempest on the sea, and some barques tossed and shaken by the fury of the winds, all executed with much judgment and thoughtful care. The same may be said of a group of figures in the air, and of the demons in various forms who are blowing, after the manner of winds, against the barques, which, driven by oars, and striving in various ways to break through the dangers of the towering waves, are like to sink. In short, to tell the truth, this work is of such a kind, and so beautiful in invention and in other respects, that it seems almost impossible that brushes and colours, employed by human hands, however excellent, should be able to depict anything more true to reality or more natural; for in it may be seen the fury of the winds, the strength and dexterity of the men, the movements of the waves, the lightning-flashes of the heavens, the water broken by the oars, and the oars bent by the waves and by the efforts of the rowers. Why say more? I, for my part, do not remember to have ever seen a more terrible painting than this, which is executed in such a manner, and with such care in the invention, the drawing, and the colouring, that the picture seems to quiver, as if all that is painted therein were real. For this work Jacopo Palma deserves the greatest praise, and the honour of being numbered among those who are masters of art and who are able to express with facility in their pictures their most sublime conceptions. For many painters, in difficult subjects of that kind, achieve in the first sketch of their work, as [Pg 261] though guided by a sort of fire of inspiration, something of the good and a certain measure of boldness; but afterwards, in finishing it, the boldness vanishes, and nothing is left of the good that the first fire produced. And this happens because very often, in finishing, they consider the parts and not the whole of what they are executing, and thus, growing cold in spirit, they come to lose their vein of boldness; whereas Jacopo stood ever firm in the same intention and brought to perfection his first conception, for which he received vast praise at that time, as he always will.
Palma was much more notable for his patience in harmonizing and blending colors than for bold design, and he handled color with incredible grace and precision. This can be seen in various paintings and portraits he created for different gentlemen in Venice; however, I'll refrain from discussing those further, as I intend to focus on some altar pieces and a head that I consider to be extraordinary, or rather, divine. One of the altar pieces he painted was for S. Antonio, near Castello, in Venice, and another for S. Elena, near the Lido, where the Monks of Monte Oliveto have their monastery. In the latter, which is on the high altar of that church, he depicted the Magi presenting their gifts to Christ, including a good number of figures, some of which have heads truly deserving of praise, as do the draperies, [Pg 260] rendered with a beautiful flow of folds that cover the figures. Palma also painted a life-size S. Barbara for the altar of the Bombardieri in the Church of S. Maria Formosa, alongside two smaller figures, S. Sebastian and S. Anthony; and S. Barbara is one of the best figures this painter ever created. He also created another altar piece featuring a Madonna in the sky, with S. John below, for the Church of S. Moisè, near the Piazza di S. Marco. Additionally, Palma painted a stunning scene for the hall where the men of the Scuola of S. Marco gather, in the Piazza di SS. Giovanni e Paolo, in competition with those already completed by Giovanni Bellini, Giovanni Mansueti, and other painters. In this scene, a ship is shown bringing the body of S. Mark to Venice; Palma captures a ferocious storm at sea, with boats tossed and shaken by the force of the winds, all executed with great skill and thoughtful care. The same can be said for a group of figures in the air, and the demons taking various forms who are blowing like winds against the boats, which, rowed tirelessly, struggle to navigate through the dangers of towering waves, seeming as if they might sink. In short, to be honest, this work is so exceptional, and so beautifully conceived in every aspect, that it seems almost impossible for brushes and colors, even in the hands of skilled artists, to depict anything more lifelike or natural; for you can see the wind's fury, the strength and skill of the men, the movement of the waves, lightning strikes in the sky, water splashing from the oars, and the oars bending under the waves and the rowers' efforts. Why say more? Personally, I can't recall ever seeing a more striking painting than this one, which is executed so precisely, and with such care in the idea, the drawing, and the coloring, that the picture seems to vibrate, as if everything depicted in it were real. For this work, Jacopo Palma deserves the highest praise and the honor of being counted among those who are true masters of art, able to express their most sublime ideas effortlessly in their paintings. Many painters, when tackling challenging subjects like this, achieve something good and a certain boldness in their initial sketches, as if propelled by a spark of inspiration; however, in the finishing process, that boldness often fades, and the initial goodness is lost. This usually happens because, when finishing, they focus too much on the parts rather than the whole picture, and thus, losing their fervor, they lose their boldness; while Jacopo remained steadfast in his initial intention and brought his first idea to perfection, which earned him great praise then, as it always will.

S. SEBASTIAN
(After the panel by Jacopo Palma [Palma Vecchio.]
Venice: S. Maria
Formosa)
Anderson
View larger image
S. SEBASTIAN
(After the panel by Jacopo Palma [Palma Vecchio.]
Venice: S. Maria
Formosa)
Anderson
View larger image
But without a doubt, although the works of this master were many, and all much esteemed, that one is better than all the others and truly extraordinary in which he made his own portrait from life by looking at himself in a mirror, with some camel-skins about him, and certain tufts of hair, and all so lifelike that nothing better could be imagined. For so much did the genius of Palma effect in this particular work, that he made it quite miraculous and beautiful beyond belief, as all men declare, the picture being seen almost every year at the Festival of the Ascension. And, in truth, it well deserves to be celebrated, in point of draughtsmanship, colouring, and mastery of art—in a word, on account of its absolute perfection—beyond any other work whatsoever that had been executed by any Venetian painter up to that time, since, besides other things, there may be seen in the eyes a roundness so perfect, that Leonardo da Vinci and Michelagnolo Buonarroti would not have done it in any other way. But it is better to say nothing of the grace, the dignity, and the other qualities that are to be seen in this portrait, because it is not possible to say as much of its perfection as would exhaust its merits. If Fate had decreed that Palma should die after this work, he would have carried off with him the glory of having surpassed all those whom we celebrate as our rarest and most divine intellects; but the duration of his life, keeping him at work, brought it about that, not maintaining the high beginning that he had made, he came to deteriorate as much as most men had thought him destined to improve. Finally, content that one or two supreme works should have cleared him of some of the censure that the others had brought upon him, he died in Venice at the age of forty-eight.
But without a doubt, even though this master created many highly regarded works, the one that stands out is the extraordinary self-portrait he made while looking at himself in a mirror, surrounded by some camel skins and tufts of hair. It’s so lifelike that nothing could be better imagined. Palma’s genius shines through in this piece, making it remarkably beautiful, as everyone agrees, with the painting being displayed almost every year at the Festival of the Ascension. Truly, it deserves to be celebrated for its drawing, color, and artistic mastery—in short, for its absolute perfection—beyond any other work by any Venetian painter up to that point. Notably, the eyes have such perfect roundness that even Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo would have struggled to achieve it differently. It's also hard to explain the grace, dignity, and other qualities of this portrait because its perfection is so vast that it would be impossible to fully do it justice. If Fate had decided Palma should die after this work, he would have taken with him the glory of surpassing all those we hold as our greatest artistic minds. However, the length of his life led him to keep working, which meant he didn’t maintain the high standard he had set, and instead, he deteriorated as many thought he would improve. Ultimately, feeling satisfied that one or two outstanding works redeemed him from some of the criticism he faced, he died in Venice at the age of forty-eight.
A friend and companion of Palma was Lorenzo Lotto, a painter of [Pg 262] Venice, who, after imitating for some time the manner of the Bellini, attached himself to that of Giorgione, as is shown by many pictures and portraits which are in the houses of gentlemen in Venice. In the house of Andrea Odoni there is a portrait of him, which is very beautiful, by the hand of Lorenzo. And in the house of Tommaso da Empoli, a Florentine, there is a picture of the Nativity of Christ, painted as an effect of night, which is one of great beauty, particularly because the splendour of Christ is seen to illuminate the picture in a marvellous manner; and there is the Madonna kneeling, with a portrait of Messer Marco Loredano in a full-length figure that is adoring Christ. For the Carmelite Friars the same master painted an altar-piece showing S. Nicholas in his episcopal robes, poised in the air, with three Angels; below him are S. Lucia and S. John, on high some clouds, and beneath these a most beautiful landscape, with many little figures and animals in various places. On one side is S. George on horseback, slaying the Dragon, and at a little distance the Maiden, with a city not far away, and an arm of the sea. For the Chapel of S. Antonino, Archbishop of Florence, in SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Lorenzo executed an altar-piece containing the first-named Saint seated with two priests in attendance, and many people below.
A friend and companion of Palma was Lorenzo Lotto, a painter from Venice, who, after copying the style of the Bellini for a while, then adopted that of Giorgione, as seen in many paintings and portraits in the homes of gentlemen in Venice. In Andrea Odoni's house, there's a stunning portrait of him by Lorenzo. In Tommaso da Empoli's house, a Florentine, there's a beautiful Nativity scene painted to look like night, where the brightness of Christ wonderfully illuminates the artwork; the Madonna is kneeling, and there's a full-length portrait of Messer Marco Loredano adoring Christ. For the Carmelite Friars, this same master painted an altarpiece depicting St. Nicholas in his bishop's robes, floating in the air with three angels; below him are St. Lucy and St. John, with some clouds above, and beneath them a gorgeous landscape filled with tiny figures and animals scattered throughout. On one side, St. George is on horseback, defeating the Dragon, and not far off is the Maiden, along with a city and an arm of the sea. For the Chapel of St. Antoninus, Archbishop of Florence, in SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Lorenzo created an altarpiece featuring the aforementioned Saint seated with two priests attending, surrounded by many people below.

THE GLORIFICATION OF S. NICHOLAS
(After the painting by Lorenzo Lotto.
Venice: S. Maria del
Carmine)
Anderson
View larger image
THE GLORIFICATION OF S. NICHOLAS
(After the painting by Lorenzo Lotto.
Venice: S. Maria del
Carmine)
Anderson
View larger image
While this painter was still young, imitating partly the manner of the Bellini and partly that of Giorgione, he painted an altar-piece, divided into six pictures, for the high-altar of S. Domenico at Recanati. In the central picture is the Madonna with the Child in her arms, giving the habit, by the hands of an Angel, to S. Dominic, who is kneeling before the Virgin; and in this picture are also two little boys, one playing on a lute and the other on a rebeck. In the second picture are the Popes S. Gregory and S. Urban; and in the third is S. Thomas Aquinas, with another saint, who was Bishop of Recanati. Above these are the three other pictures; and in the centre, above the Madonna, is a Dead Christ, supported by an Angel, with His Mother kissing His arm, and S. Magdalene. Over the picture of S. Gregory are S. Mary Magdalene and S. Vincent; and in the third—namely, above the S. Thomas Aquinas—are S. Gismondo and S. Catharine of Siena. In the predella, which is a [Pg 263] rare work painted with little figures, there is in the centre the scene of S. Maria di Loreto being carried by the Angels from the regions of Sclavonia to the place where it now stands. Of the two scenes that are on either side of this, one shows S. Dominic preaching, the little figures being the most graceful in the world, and the other Pope Honorius confirming the Rule of S. Dominic. In the middle of this church is a figure of S. Vincent, the Friar, executed in fresco by the hand of the same master. And in the Church of S. Maria di Castelnuovo there is an altar-piece in oils of the Transfiguration of Christ, with three scenes painted with little figures in the predella—Christ leading the Apostles to Mount Tabor, His Prayer in the Garden, and His Ascension into Heaven.
While this painter was still young, drawing inspiration from both Bellini and Giorgione, he created an altar-piece made up of six paintings for the high altar of S. Domenico at Recanati. In the central painting, the Madonna holds the Child in her arms, and an Angel hands the habit to S. Dominic, who kneels before the Virgin. There are also two little boys in this painting, one playing a lute and the other a rebec. The second painting features Popes S. Gregory and S. Urban, while the third shows S. Thomas Aquinas along with another saint, who was the Bishop of Recanati. Above these are the other three paintings; in the center, above the Madonna, is a Dead Christ, supported by an Angel, with His Mother kissing His arm, and S. Magdalene beside them. Above the painting of S. Gregory are S. Mary Magdalene and S. Vincent, and in the third—above S. Thomas Aquinas—are S. Gismondo and S. Catherine of Siena. In the predella, which is a [Pg 263] rare work featuring small figures, the central scene depicts S. Maria di Loreto being carried by Angels from Sclavonia to its current location. On either side of this scene, one shows S. Dominic preaching, where the little figures are incredibly graceful, and the other depicts Pope Honorius confirming the Rule of S. Dominic. In the middle of this church is a fresco of S. Vincent, the Friar, created by the same master. Additionally, in the Church of S. Maria di Castelnuovo, there is an oil painting altar-piece of the Transfiguration of Christ, with three scenes in the predella—Christ leading the Apostles to Mount Tabor, His Prayer in the Garden, and His Ascension into Heaven.

ANDREA ODONI
(After the painting by Lorenzo Lotto.
Hampton Court Palace)
Mansell
View larger image
ANDREA ODONI
(After the painting by Lorenzo Lotto.
Hampton Court Palace)
Mansell
View larger image
After these works Lorenzo went to Ancona, at the very time when Mariano da Perugia had finished a panel-picture, with a large ornamental frame, for the high-altar of S. Agostino. This did not give much satisfaction; and Lorenzo was commissioned to paint a picture, which is placed in the middle of the same church, of Our Lady with the Child in her lap, and two figures of Angels in the air, in foreshortening, crowning the Virgin.
After these projects, Lorenzo traveled to Ancona, right when Mariano da Perugia had completed a panel painting, featuring a large decorative frame, for the high altar of S. Agostino. This didn’t receive much praise, so Lorenzo was hired to paint a piece that is now placed in the center of the same church. It depicts Our Lady with the Child in her lap, along with two angels above her in foreshortening, crowning the Virgin.
Finally, being now old, and having almost lost his voice, Lorenzo made his way, after executing some other works of no great importance at Ancona, to the Madonna of Loreto, where he had already painted an altar-piece in oils, which is in a chapel at the right hand of the entrance into the church. There, having resolved to finish his life in the service of the Madonna, and to make that holy house his habitation, he set his hand to executing scenes with figures one braccio or less in height round the choir, over the seats of the priests. In one scene he painted the Birth of Jesus Christ, and in another the Magi adoring Him. Next came the Presentation to Simeon, and after that the Baptism of Christ by John in the Jordan. There was also the Woman taken in Adultery being led before Christ, and all these were executed with much grace. Two other scenes, likewise, did he paint there, with an abundance of figures; one of David causing a sacrifice to be offered, and in the other was the Archangel Michael in combat with Lucifer, after having driven him out of Heaven.
Finally, now that he was old and had nearly lost his voice, Lorenzo made his way, after completing a few other minor works in Ancona, to the Madonna of Loreto. There, he had already painted an altar piece in oils, which can be found in a chapel to the right of the church entrance. Having decided to spend his final days in service to the Madonna and to make that holy place his home, he began working on scenes featuring figures about one braccio or less in height around the choir, above the priests' seats. In one scene, he depicted the Birth of Jesus Christ, and in another, the Magi worshiping Him. Following this was the Presentation to Simeon, and after that, the Baptism of Christ by John in the Jordan. He also painted the Woman caught in Adultery being brought before Christ, all executed with great grace. Additionally, he created two more scenes filled with figures: one depicting David ordering a sacrifice, and the other showing the Archangel Michael battling Lucifer after casting him out of Heaven.
[Pg 264] These works finished, no long time had passed when, even as he had lived like a good citizen and a true Christian, so he died, rendering up his soul to God his Master. These last years of his life he found full of happiness and serenity of mind, and, what is more, we cannot but believe that they gave him the earnest of the blessings of eternal life; which might not have happened to him if at the end of his life he had been wrapped up too closely in the things of this world, which, pressing too heavily on those who put their whole trust in them, prevent them from ever raising their minds to the true riches and the supreme blessedness and felicity of the other life.
[Pg 264] After finishing these works, it wasn't long before, just as he had lived as a good citizen and a true Christian, he passed away, surrendering his soul to God, his Master. In the last years of his life, he experienced happiness and a peaceful mind, and we can’t help but believe that these years gave him a taste of the blessings of eternal life; which might not have happened if, at the end of his life, he had been too focused on worldly matters, which weigh heavily on those who rely solely on them, preventing them from ever thinking about the true wealth and ultimate joy of the afterlife.

RONDINELLO (NICCOLÒ RONDINELLI): MADONNA AND CHILD
(Paris: Louvre, 1159. Panel)
View larger image
RONDINELLO (NICCOLÒ RONDINELLI): MADONNA AND CHILD
(Paris: Louvre, 1159. Panel)
View larger image
There also flourished in Romagna at this time the excellent painter Rondinello, of whom we made some slight mention in the Life of Giovanni Bellini, whose disciple he was, assisting him much in his works. This Rondinello, after leaving Giovanni Bellini, laboured at his art to such purpose, that, being very diligent, he executed many works worthy of praise; of which we have witness in the panel-picture of the high-altar in the Duomo at Forlì, showing Christ giving the Communion to the Apostles, which he painted there with his own hand, executing it very well. In the lunette above this picture he painted a Dead Christ, and in the predella some scenes with little figures, finished with great diligence, representing the actions of S. Helena, the mother of the Emperor Constantine, in the finding of the Cross. He also painted a single figure of S. Sebastian, which is very beautiful, in a picture in the same church. For the altar of S. Maria Maddalena, in the Duomo of Ravenna, he painted a panel-picture in oils containing the single figure of that Saint; and below this, in a predella, he executed three scenes with very graceful little figures. In one is Christ appearing to Mary Magdalene in the form of a gardener, in another S. Peter leaving the ship and walking over the water towards Christ, and between them the Baptism of Jesus Christ; and all are very beautiful. For S. Giovanni Evangelista, in the same city, he painted two panel-pictures, one with that Saint consecrating the church, and in the other three martyrs, S. Cantius, S. Cantianus, and S. Cantianilla, figures of great beauty. In S. Apollinare, also in that city, are two pictures, highly extolled, each with a single figure, S. John the Baptist [Pg 265] and S. Sebastian. And in the Church of the Spirito Santo there is a panel, likewise by his hand, containing the Madonna placed between the Virgin Martyr S. Catharine and S. Jerome. For S. Francesco, likewise, he painted two panel-pictures, one of S. Catharine and S. Francis, and in the other Our Lady with S. James the Apostle, S. Francis, and many figures. For S. Domenico, in like manner, he executed two other panels, one of which, containing the Madonna and many figures, is on the left hand of the high-altar, and the other, a work of no little beauty, is on a wall of the church. And for the Church of S. Niccolò, a convent of Friars of S. Augustine, he painted another panel with S. Laurence and S. Francis. So much was he commended for all these works, that during his lifetime he was held in great account, not only in Ravenna but throughout all Romagna. Rondinello lived to the age of sixty, and was buried in S. Francesco at Ravenna.
At this time in Romagna, the talented painter Rondinello thrived. We briefly mentioned him in the Life of Giovanni Bellini, under whom he studied and assisted with many works. After leaving Bellini, Rondinello dedicated himself to his craft, producing numerous commendable pieces. One notable work is the panel for the high altar in the Duomo at Forlì, depicting Christ giving Communion to the Apostles, which he painted very well with his own hands. Above this picture, he painted a Dead Christ in a lunette, and in the predella, he created several smaller scenes that illustrate the actions of St. Helena, the mother of Emperor Constantine, in finding the Cross. He also painted a beautiful single figure of St. Sebastian in another piece in the same church. For the altar of St. Maria Maddalena in the Duomo of Ravenna, he created an oil painting featuring just that Saint, along with a predella below it that includes three charming scenes. One shows Christ appearing to Mary Magdalene as a gardener, another depicts St. Peter stepping out of the boat and walking on water toward Christ, and the third features the Baptism of Jesus Christ; all are beautifully crafted. For St. Giovanni Evangelista in the same city, he produced two panel paintings: one of that Saint consecrating the church and the other featuring three martyrs—St. Cantius, St. Cantianus, and St. Cantianilla—with striking beauty. In St. Apollinare, also in the city, two highly praised pictures exist, each showcasing a single figure: St. John the Baptist [Pg 265] and St. Sebastian. In the Church of the Spirito Santo, there’s another panel by him including the Madonna flanked by the Virgin Martyr St. Catherine and St. Jerome. He also painted two panels for St. Francesco, one showing St. Catherine and St. Francis, and the other featuring Our Lady with St. James the Apostle, St. Francis, and many figures. For St. Domenico, he created two more panels—one, which includes the Madonna and several figures, is located on the left side of the high altar, and the other, noted for its beauty, is on a wall in the church. For the Church of St. Niccolò, a convent of Augustinian Friars, he painted yet another panel featuring St. Laurence and St. Francis. Rondinello received so much praise for all these works that during his lifetime, he was held in high regard, not just in Ravenna but throughout all of Romagna. He lived to be sixty years old and was buried in St. Francesco in Ravenna.

MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the painting by Rondinello [Niccolò Rondinelli].
Ravenna:
Accademia)
Alinari
View larger image
MADONNA AND CHILD WITH SAINTS
(After the painting by Rondinello [Niccolò Rondinelli].
Ravenna:
Accademia)
Alinari
View larger image
This master left behind him Francesco da Cotignola, a painter likewise held in estimation in that city, who painted many works; in particular, for the high-altar of the Church of the Abbey of Classi in Ravenna, a panel-picture of some size representing the Raising of Lazarus, with many figures. There, opposite to that work, in the year 1548, Giorgio Vasari executed for Don Romualdo da Verona, Abbot of that place, another panel-picture containing the Deposition of Christ from the Cross, with a large number of figures. Francesco also painted a panel-picture of the Nativity of Christ, which is of great size, for S. Niccolò, and likewise two panels, with various figures, for S. Sebastiano. For the Hospital of S. Catarina he painted a panel-picture with Our Lady, S. Catharine, and many other figures; and for S. Agata he painted a panel with Christ Crucified, the Madonna at the foot of the Cross, and a good number of other figures, for which he won praise. And for S. Apollinare, in the same city, he executed three panel-pictures; one for the high-altar, containing the Madonna, S. John the Baptist, and S. Apollinare, with S. Jerome and other saints; another likewise of the Madonna, with S. Peter and S. Catharine; and in the third and last Jesus Christ bearing His Cross, but this he was not able to finish, being overtaken by death.
This master left behind Francesco da Cotignola, a painter who was also well-regarded in that city and created many works. Notably, he painted a large panel for the high altar of the Abbey of Classi Church in Ravenna, depicting the Raising of Lazarus, featuring many figures. In front of that work, in 1548, Giorgio Vasari created another panel for Don Romualdo da Verona, the Abbot of that place, showing the Deposition of Christ from the Cross, also with a large number of figures. Francesco also painted a large Nativity of Christ for S. Niccolò, and two panels with various figures for S. Sebastiano. For the Hospital of S. Catarina, he created a panel featuring Our Lady, S. Catharine, and many other figures, and for S. Agata, he painted a panel with Christ Crucified, the Madonna at the foot of the Cross, and several other figures, earning him praise. Additionally, for S. Apollinare in the same city, he created three panel pictures; one for the high altar, featuring the Madonna, S. John the Baptist, and S. Apollinare, along with S. Jerome and other saints; another of the Madonna with S. Peter and S. Catharine; and in the third, Jesus Christ carrying His Cross, which he couldn’t complete because he passed away.
[Pg 266] Francesco was a very pleasing colourist, but not so good a draughtsman as Rondinello; yet he was held in no small estimation by the people of Ravenna. He chose to be buried after his death in S. Apollinare, for which he had painted the said figures, being content that his remains, when he was dead, should lie at rest in the place for which he had laboured when alive.
[Pg 266] Francesco was a talented colorist, but he wasn't as skilled at drawing as Rondinello; still, he was highly regarded by the people of Ravenna. He chose to be buried in S. Apollinare, where he had painted those figures, feeling satisfied that his remains should rest in the place he had worked for during his life.

THE ADORATION OF THE SHEPHERDS
(After the panel by Francesco da Cotignola.
Ravenna: Accademia)
Alinari
View larger image
THE ADORATION OF THE SHEPHERDS
(After the panel by Francesco da Cotignola.
Ravenna: Accademia)
Alinari
View larger image
[Pg 267] INDEX OF NAMES OF THE CRAFTSMEN MENTIONED IN VOLUME V
- Agnolo, Andrea d' (Andrea del Sarto), Life, 85-120. 164, 194, 217-221, 231
- Agnolo, Baccio d' (Baccio Baglioni), 91, 98, 102
- Agnolo Bronzino, 127, 163
- Agnolo di Cristofano, 223
- Agnolo di Donnino, 38
- Agostino Busto (Il Bambaja), 42, 43
- Agostino Viniziano, 97
- Aimo, Domenico (Bologna), 28
- Albertinelli, Mariotto, 86, 212, 217
- Albertino, Francesco d' (Francesco Ubertini, or Il Bacchiacca), 222
- Alberto, Antonio, 13
- Albrecht Dürer, 96
- Alessandro Allori, 127
- Alessandro Vittoria, 247
- Alesso Baldovinetti, 88, 92
- Alfonso Lombardi, Life, 131-136. 210
- Allori, Alessandro, 127
- Amalteo, Pomponio, 154, 155
- Amico Aspertini, Life, 209-211. 125, 207-211
- Andrea Contucci (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Andrea d' Agnolo (Andrea del Sarto), Life, 85-120. 164, 194, 217-221, 231
- Andrea da Fiesole (Andrea Ferrucci), Life, 3-8. 11
- Andrea dal Castagno (Andrea degli Impiccati), 116
- Andrea dal Monte Sansovino (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea Contucci), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Andrea degli Impiccati (Andrea dal Castagno), 116
- Andrea del Sarto (Andrea d' Agnolo), Life, 85-120. 164, 194, 217-221, 231
- Andrea della Robbia, 90
- Andrea di Cosimo Feltrini, Life, 229-233. 221, 228
- Andrea Ferrucci (Andrea da Fiesole), Life, 3-8. 11
- Andrea Sansovino (Andrea Contucci, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Andrea Sguazzella, 100, 118
- Andrea Verrocchio, 49, 50, 55
- Anguisciuola, Sofonisba, 127, 128
- Antonio Alberto, 13
- Antonio da Carrara, 8
- Antonio da San Gallo (the elder), 97
- Antonio da San Gallo (the younger), 29, 43, 58, 72
- Antonio da Trento (Antonio Fantuzzi), 249, 250
- Antonio del Rozzo (Antonio del Tozzo), 73
- Antonio di Donnino Mazzieri, 223
- Antonio di Giorgio Marchissi, 4
- Antonio di Giovanni (Solosmeo), 118
- Antonio Fantuzzi (Antonio da Trento), 249, 250
- Antonio Floriani, 148, 149
- Antonio Mini, 165
- Antonio Pollaiuolo, 21
- Apelles, 14
- Aretusi, Pellegrino degli (Pellegrino da Modena, or Pellegrino de' Munari), Life, 80-81. 176
- Aristotele (Sebastiano) da San Gallo, 97
- Aspertini, Amico, Life, 209-211. 125, 207-211
- Bacchiacca, Il (Francesco Ubertini, or Francesco d' Albertino), 222
- Baccio Baglioni (Baccio d' Agnolo), 91, 98, 102
- Baccio Bandinelli, 5, 27, 36, 57, 96-98, 135
- Baccio d' Agnolo (Baccio Baglioni), 91, 98, 102
- Baccio da Montelupo, Life, 41-45. 97
- Baccio della Porta (Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco), 159, 160, 194
- Baglioni, Baccio (Baccio d' Agnolo), 91, 98, 102
- Bagnacavallo, Bartolommeo da (Bartolommeo Ramenghi), Life, 207-209
- Bagnacavallo, Giovan Battista da, 201
- Baldassarre Peruzzi, Life, 63-74. 57, 63-74, 136, 170, 176, 208
- Baldovinetti, Alesso, 88, 92
- Bambaja, Il (Agostino Busto), 42, 43
- Bandinelli, Baccio, 5, 27, 36, 57, 96-98, 135
- Barbieri, Domenico del, 201
- Barile, Gian (of Florence), 86
- Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo (Bartolommeo Ramenghi), Life, 207-209
- Bartolommeo di San Marco, Fra (Baccio della Porta), 159, 160, 194
- Bartolommeo Miniati, 201
- Bartolommeo Neroni (Riccio), 73
- Bartolommeo Ramenghi (Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo), Life, 207-209
- Bastianello Florigorio (Sebastiano Florigerio), 148
- Battista, Martino di (Pellegrino da San Daniele, or Martino da Udine), 145-150
- Battista Dossi, Life, 139-141
- Battistino, 193, 194
- Baviera, 194
- Bazzi, Giovanni Antonio (Sodoma), 73
- Beccafumi, Domenico (Domenico di Pace), 74, 153, 163
- Belli, Valerio de' (Valerio Vicentino), 247
- Bellini family, 262
- Bellini, Giovanni, 145, 146, 260, 264
- Bembo, Giovan Francesco (Giovan Francesco Vetraio), 180
- Benedetto, 165
- Benedetto da Ferrara (Benedetto Coda), 211, 212
- Benedetto da Maiano, 5
- Benedetto da Rovezzano, Life, 35-38
- Benedetto Spadari, 195, 196
- Benvenuto Cellini, 135
- Bernardino del Lupino (Bernardino Luini), 60
- Bernardino Pinturicchio, 227
- Bernardo da Vercelli, 151
- Bernardo del Buda (Bernardo Rosselli), 116
- Bernazzano, Cesare, 141
- Biagio, Raffaello di, 231, 232
- Biagio Bolognese (Biagio Pupini), 208, 211
- Bicci, Lorenzo di, 5
- Boccaccino, Boccaccio, Life, 58-60
- Boccaccino, Camillo, 59, 60
- Boccalino, Giovanni (Giovanni Ribaldi), 29
- Bologna (Domenico Aimo), 28
- Bolognese, Biagio (Biagio Pupini), 208, 211
- Borgo, Raffaello dal (Raffaello dal Colle), 140, 195, 196
- Borgo, Santi Titi dal, 160
- Boscoli, Maso, 6
- Bramante da Urbino, 26, 28, 29, 65, 68, 69
- Bronzino, Agnolo, 127, 163
- Buda, Bernardo del (Bernardo Rosselli), 116
- Buonaccorsi, Perino (Perino del Vaga), 7, 77-79, 153, 162
- Buonarroti, Michelagnolo, 5, 6, 23, 43-45, 58, 86, 111, 117, 128, 135, 165, 190, 194, 228, 245, 247, 261
- Busto, Agostino (Il Bambaja), 42, 43
- Caccianimici, Francesco, 201
- Caccianimici, Vincenzio, 255, 256
- Cadore, Tiziano da (Tiziano Vecelli), 66, 133, 134, 152, 153
- Calavrese, Marco (Marco Cardisco), Life, 237-239
- Caldara, Polidoro (Polidoro da Caravaggio), Life, 175-185
- Calzolaio, Sandrino del, 161, 165
- Camillo Boccaccino, 59, 60
- Capanna (of Siena), 74
- Caraglio, Giovanni Jacopo, 194
- Caravaggio, Polidoro da (Polidoro Caldara), Life, 175-185
- Cardisco, Marco (Marco Calavrese), Life, 237-239
- Carpi, Girolamo da (Girolamo da Ferrara), 154
- Carrara, Antonio da, 8
- Carrara, Danese da (Danese Cattaneo), 135
- Carrucci, Jacopo (Jacopo da Pontormo), 93, 98, 104, 118, 135, 190, 221, 222, 231, 232
- Castagno, Andrea dal (Andrea degli Impiccati), 116
- Castelfranco, Giorgione da, 149, 228, 262
- Castellani, Leonardo, 238
- Castrocaro, Gian Jacopo da, 50
- Cattaneo, Danese (Danese da Carrara), 135
- Cellini, Benvenuto, 135
- Cesare Bernazzano, 141
- Cesare da Sesto (Cesare da Milano), 65, 141
- Cicilia, Il, 8
- Cimabue, Giovanni, 177
- Cioli, Simone, 30
- Claudio of Paris, 201
- Coda, Benedetto (Benedetto da Ferrara), 211, 212
- Cola dalla Matrice (Niccola Filotesio), 238, 239
- Colle, Raffaello dal (Raffaello dal Borgo), 140, 195, 196
- Conte, Jacopo del, 119
- Conti, Domenico, 115, 119
- Contucci, Andrea (Andrea Sansovino, or Andrea dal Monte Sansovino), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Cosimo, Piero di, 86
- Cosimo Rosselli, 88, 229
- Cosimo, Silvio, 6-8
- Cotignola, Francesco da (Francesco de' Zaganelli), Life, 265-266
- Cotignola, Girolamo da (Girolamo Marchesi), Life, 211-212. 207
- Credi, Lorenzo di, Life, 49-52. 159
- Credi, Maestro, 49
- Crescione, Giovan Filippo, 238
- Cristofano, Agnolo di, 223
- Cronaca, Il (Simone del Pollaiuolo), 22
- Cuticello (Giovanni Antonio Licinio, or Pordenone), Life, 145-155
- Danese da Carrara (Danese Cattaneo), 135
- Della Robbia family, 22
- Domenico Aimo (Bologna), 28
- Domenico Beccafumi (Domenico di Pace), 74, 153, 163
- Domenico Conti, 115, 119
- Domenico dal Monte Sansovino, 30
- Domenico del Barbieri, 201
- Domenico di Pace (Domenico Beccafumi), 74, 153, 163
- Domenico di Paris, 195
- Domenico di Polo, 135
- Domenico Puligo, 109
- Donato (Donatello), 23
- Donnino, Agnolo di, 38
- Dossi, Battista, Life, 139-141
- Dossi, Dosso, Life, 139-141
- Dürer, Albrecht, 96
- Fagiuoli, Girolamo, 250
- Fantuzzi, Antonio (Antonio da Trento), 249, 250
- Fattore, Il (Giovan Francesco Penni), Life, 77-80. 201
- Feltrini, Andrea di Cosimo, Life, 229-233. 221, 228
- Feltro, Morto da, Life, 227-229. 230
- Ferrara, Benedetto da (Benedetto Coda), 211, 212
- Ferrara, Girolamo da (Girolamo da Carpi), 154
- Ferrari, Gaudenzio, 81
- Ferrucci, Andrea (Andrea da Fiesole), Life, 3-8. 11
- Ferrucci, Francesco di Simone, 3
- Fiesole, Andrea da (Andrea Ferrucci), Life, 3-8. 11
- Filippo Lippi (Filippino), 87
- Filotesio, Niccola (Cola dalla Matrice), 238, 239
- Floriani, Antonio, 148, 149
- Floriani, Francesco, 148, 149
- Florigorio, Bastianello (Sebastiano Florigerio), 148
- Fontana, Prospero, 213
- Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco (Baccio della Porta), 159, 160, 194
- Fra Sebastiano Viniziano del Piombo, 66
- Francesco, Mariotto di, 231-233
- Francesco Caccianimici, 201
- Francesco d' Albertino (Francesco Ubertini, or Il Bacchiacca), 222
- Francesco da Cotignola (Francesco de' Zaganelli), Life, 265-266
- Francesco da San Gallo, 27
- Francesco da Siena, 71, 73
- Francesco de' Rossi (Francesco Salviati), 119
- Francesco de' Zaganelli (Francesco da Cotignola), Life, 265-266
- Francesco di Girolamo dal Prato, 135
- Francesco di Mirozzo (Melozzo), 140
- Francesco di Simone Ferrucci, 3
- Francesco Floriani, 148, 149
- Francesco Granacci (Il Granaccio), 97, 98, 231
- Francesco Mazzuoli (Parmigiano), Life, 243-256
- Francesco of Orleans, 201
- Francesco Primaticcio, 200, 201, 203
- Francesco Salviati (Francesco de' Rossi), 119
- Francesco Ubertini (Francesco d' Albertino, or Il Bacchiacca), 222
- Franciabigio (Francia), Life, 217-223. 86-89, 91, 93, 101, 103, 104, 217-223, 231, 232
- Francucci, Innocenzio (Innocenzio da Imola), Life, 212-213. 207, 209
- Gaudenzio Ferrari, 81
- Genga, Girolamo, 15, 16, 140
- Gensio Liberale, 149
- Ghirlandajo, Michele di Ridolfo, 165
- Ghirlandajo, Ridolfo, 220, 231
- Gian Barile (of Florence), 86
- Gian Jacopo da Castrocaro, 50
- Giannuzzi, Giulio Pippi de' (Giulio Romano), 55, 77-79, 108, 109, 195
- Giorgio Vasari. See Vasari (Giorgio)
- Giorgione da Castelfranco, 149, 228, 262
- Giotto, 21
- Giovan Battista da Bagnacavallo, 201
- Giovan Battista de' Rossi (Il Rosso), Life, 189-203. 97
- Giovan Battista Grassi, 148
- Giovan Battista Peloro, 73
- Giovan Filippo Crescione, 238
- Giovan Francesco Bembo (Giovan Francesco Vetraio), 180
- Giovan Francesco Penni (Il Fattore), Life, 77-80. 201
- Giovan Francesco Vetraio (Giovan Francesco Bembo), 180
- Giovanni, Antonio di (Solosmeo), 118
- Giovanni Antonio Bazzi (Sodoma), 73
- Giovanni Antonio Lappoli, 196-198
- Giovanni Antonio Licinio (Cuticello, or Pordenone), Life, 145-155
- Giovanni Antonio Sogliani, Life, 159-166. 51
- Giovanni Bellini, 145, 146, 260, 264
- Giovanni Boccalino (Giovanni Ribaldi), 29
- Giovanni Cimabue, 177
- Giovanni da Nola, 137-139
- Giovanni da Udine (Giovanni Martini), 145-147
- Giovanni da Udine (Giovanni Nanni, or Giovanni Ricamatori), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Giovanni Jacopo Caraglio, 194
- Giovanni Mangone, 5
- Giovanni Mansueti, 260
- Giovanni Martini (Giovanni da Udine), 145-147
- Giovanni Nanni (Giovanni da Udine, or Giovanni Ricamatori), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Giovanni Ribaldi (Giovanni Boccalino), 29
- Giovanni Ricamatori (Giovanni da Udine, or Giovanni Nanni), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Girolamo, 60
- Girolamo da Carpi (Girolamo da Ferrara), 154
- Girolamo da Cotignola (Girolamo Marchesi), Life, 211-212. 207
- Girolamo da Ferrara (Girolamo da Carpi), 154
- Girolamo da Treviso (Girolamo Trevigi), Life, 169-171. 68
- Girolamo della Robbia, 90
- Girolamo Fagiuoli, 250
- Girolamo Genga, 15, 16, 140
- Girolamo Lombardo, 24, 28-30
- Girolamo Marchesi (Girolamo da Cotignola), Life, 211-212. 207
- Girolamo Mazzuoli, 244, 245, 254, 255
- Girolamo Santa Croce, Life, 137-138
- Girolamo Trevigi (Girolamo da Treviso), Life, 169-171. 68
- Giuliano da San Gallo, 97
- Giuliano del Tasso, 97
- Giuliano (di Niccolò Morelli), Maestro, 73
- Giulio Romano (Giulio Pippi de' Giannuzzi), 55, 77-79, 108, 109, 195
- Granacci, Francesco (Il Granaccio), 97, 98, 231
- Grassi, Giovan Battista, 148
- Guazzetto, Il (Lorenzo Naldino), 201
- Il Bacchiacca (Francesco Ubertini, or Francesco d' Albertino), 222
- Il Bambaja (Agostino Busto), 42, 43
- Il Cicilia, 8
- Il Cronaca (Simone del Pollaiuolo), 22
- Il Fattore (Giovan Francesco Penni), Life, 77-80. 201
- Il Granaccio (Francesco Granacci), 97, 98, 231
- Il Guazzetto (Lorenzo Naldino), 201
- Il Pistoia (Leonardo), 79, 80
- Il Rosso (Giovan Battista de' Rossi), Life, 189-203. 97
- Imola, Innocenzio da (Innocenzio Francucci), Life, 212-213. 207, 209
- Impiccati, Andrea degli (Andrea dal Castagno), 116
- Innocenzio da Imola (Innocenzio Francucci), Life, 212-213. 207, 209
- Jacomo Melighino, 72, 73
- Jacone (Jacopo), 119
- Jacopo da Pontormo (Jacopo Carrucci), 93, 98, 104, 118, 135, 190, 221, 222, 231, 232
- Jacopo del Conte, 119
- Jacopo di Sandro, 97
- Jacopo Palma (Palma Vecchio), Life, 259-261
- Jacopo Sansovino, 5, 31, 35, 36, 80, 88, 92, 93, 97, 98, 180, 218, 231, 247
- Lappoli, Giovanni Antonio, 196-198
- Lattanzio Pagani, 212
- Leonardo (Il Pistoia), 79, 80
- Leonardo Castellani, 238
- Leonardo da Vinci, 49, 50, 86, 228, 261
- Leonardo del Tasso, 31
- Leonardo the Fleming, 201
- Liberale, Gensio, 149
- Licinio, Giovanni Antonio (Cuticello, or Pordenone), Life, 145-155
- Lippi, Filippo (Filippino), 87
- Lombardi, Alfonso, Life, 131-136. 210
- Lombardo, Girolamo, 24, 28-30
- Lorenzetto (Lorenzo) Lotti, Life, 55-58
- Lorenzo di Bicci, 5
- Lorenzo di Credi, Life, 49-52. 159
- Lorenzo Lotto, Life, 261-264
- Lorenzo Naldino (Il Guazzetto), 201
- Lorenzo of Picardy, 201
- Lotti, Lorenzetto (Lorenzo), Life, 55-58
- Lotto, Lorenzo, Life, 261-264
- Luca della Robbia (the younger), 90
- Luca Monverde, 147
- Luca Penni, 79, 201
- Lucrezia, Madonna, 127
- Luini, Bernardino (Bernardino del Lupino), 60
- Lunetti, Stefano (Stefano of Florence), 51
- Lunetti, Tommaso di Stefano, 51, 52, 164, 231
- Lupino, Bernardino del (Bernardino Luini), 60
- Madonna Lucrezia, 127
- Madonna Properzia de' Rossi, Life, 123-128
- Maestro Credi, 49
- Maestro Giuliano (di Niccolò Morelli), 73
- Maiano, Benedetto da, 5
- Maini (Marini), Michele, 3, 4
- Mangone, Giovanni, 5
- Mansueti, Giovanni, 260
- Marchesi, Girolamo (Girolamo da Cotignola), Life, 211-212. 207
- Marchissi, Antonio di Giorgio, 4
- Marco Calavrese (Marco Cardisco), Life, 237-239
- Mariano da Perugia, 263
- Marini (Maini), Michele, 3, 4
- Mariotto Albertinelli, 86, 212, 217
- Mariotto di Francesco, 231-233
- Martini, Giovanni (Giovanni da Udine), 145-147
- Martino da Udine (Pellegrino da San Daniele, or Martino di Battista), 145-150
- Maso Boscoli, 6
- Matrice, Cola dalla (Niccola Filotesio), 238, 239
- Maturino, Life, 175-185
- Mazzieri, Antonio di Donnino, 223
- Mazzuoli, Francesco (Parmigiano), Life, 243-256
- Mazzuoli, Girolamo, 244, 245, 254, 255
- Melighino, Jacomo, 72, 73
- Michelagnolo Buonarroti, 5, 6, 23, 43-45, 58, 86, 111, 117, 128, 135, 165, 190, 194, 228, 245, 247, 261
- Michelagnolo da Siena, Life, 136-137. 69
- Michele di Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, 165
- Michele Maini (Marini), 3, 4
- Milano, Cesare da (Cesare da Sesto), 65, 141
- Mini, Antonio, 165
- Miniati, Bartolommeo, 201
- Mirozzo (Melozzo), Francesco di, 140
- Modena, Pellegrino da (Pellegrino degli Aretusi, or Pellegrino de' Munari), Life, 80-81. 176
- Monte Sansovino, Andrea dal (Andrea Contucci, or Andrea Sansovino), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Monte Sansovino, Domenico dal, 30
- Montelupo, Baccio da, Life, 41-45. 97
- Montelupo, Raffaello da, Life, 41-45. 27, 119
- Monverde, Luca, 147
- Morelli, Maestro Giuliano di Niccolò, 73
- Morto da Feltro, Life, 227-229. 230
- Mosca, Simone, 44
- Munari, Pellegrino de' (Pellegrino da Modena, or Pellegrino degli Aretusi), Life, 80-81. 176
- Naldino, Lorenzo (Il Guazzetto), 201
- Nanni, Giovanni (Giovanni da Udine, or Giovanni Ricamatori), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Nannoccio, 119
- Neroni, Bartolommeo (Riccio), 73
- Niccola Filotesio (Cola dalla Matrice), 238, 239
- Niccolò (called Tribolo), 6, 28, 136, 233
- Niccolò Rondinello (Rondinello da Ravenna), Life, 264-265. 266
- Niccolò Soggi, 109, 110, 196
- Nola, Giovanni da, 137-139
- Pace, Domenico di (Domenico Beccafumi), 74, 153, 163
- Pagani, Lattanzio, 212
- Palma, Jacopo (Palma Vecchio), Life, 259-261
- Paolo Romano, 57
- Paris, Domenico di, 195
- Parmigiano (Francesco Mazzuoli), Life, 243-256
- Pellegrino da Modena (Pellegrino degli Aretusi, or Pellegrino de' Munari), Life, 80-81. 176
- Pellegrino da San Daniele (Martino da Udine, or Martino di Battista), 145-150
- Peloro, Giovan Battista, 73
- Penni, Giovan Francesco (Il Fattore), Life, 77-80. 201
- Penni, Luca, 79, 201
- Perino del Vaga (Perino Buonaccorsi), 7, 77-79, 153, 162
- Perugia, Mariano da, 263
- Perugino, Pietro (Pietro Vannucci), 49, 50, 87, 230
- Peruzzi, Baldassarre, Life, 63-74. 57, 63-74, 136, 170, 176, 208
- Pier Francesco di Jacopo di Sandro, 118, 119
- Piero da Volterra, 64
- Piero di Cosimo, 86
- Pietrasanta, Stagio da, 162
- Pietro Perugino (Pietro Vannucci), 49, 50, 87, 230
- Pinturicchio, Bernardino, 227
- Piombo, Fra Sebastiano Viniziano del, 66
- Pistoia, Il (Leonardo), 79, 80
- Plautilla, 126
- Poggini, Zanobi, 106
- Poggino, Zanobi di, 165
- Polidoro da Caravaggio (Polidoro Caldara), Life, 175-185
- Pollaiuolo, Antonio, 21
- Pollaiuolo, Simone del (Il Cronaca), 22
- Polo, Domenico di, 135
- Pomponio Amalteo, 154, 155
- Pontormo, Jacopo da (Jacopo Carrucci), 93, 98, 104, 118, 135, 190, 221, 222, 231, 232
- Pordenone (Giovanni Antonio Licinio, or Cuticello), Life, 145-155
- Porta, Baccio della (Fra Bartolommeo di San Marco), 159, 160, 194
- Prato, Francesco di Girolamo dal, 135
- Primaticcio, Francesco, 200, 201, 203
- Properzia de' Rossi, Madonna, Life, 123-128
- Prospero Fontana, 213
- Puligo, Domenico, 109
- Pupini, Biagio (Biagio Bolognese), 208, 211
- Raffaello da Montelupo, Life, 41-45. 27, 119
- Raffaello da Urbino (Raffaello Sanzio), 11-15, 55, 56, 66, 72, 77-81, 107-109, 117, 126, 169, 175, 191, 194, 201, 207, 208, 213, 222, 245, 247
- Raffaello dal Colle (Raffaello dal Borgo), 140, 195, 196
- Raffaello di Biagio, 231, 232
- Raffaello Sanzio (Raffaello da Urbino), 11-15, 55, 56, 66, 72, 77-81, 107-109, 117, 126, 169, 175, 191, 194, 201, 207, 208, 213, 222, 245, 247
- Ramenghi, Bartolommeo (Bartolommeo da Bagnacavallo), Life, 207-209
- Ravenna, Rondinello da (Niccolò Rondinello), Life, 264-265. 266
- Ribaldi, Giovanni (Giovanni Boccalino), 29
- Ricamatori, Giovanni (Giovanni Nanni, or Giovanni da Udine), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Riccio (Bartolommeo Neroni), 73
- Ridolfo Ghirlandajo, 220, 231
- Robbia, Andrea della, 90
- Robbia, Girolamo della, 90
- Robbia, Luca della (the younger), 90
- Romano, Giulio (Giulio Pippi de' Giannuzzi), 55, 77-79, 108, 109, 195
- Romano, Paolo, 57
- Romano, Virgilio, 73
- Rondinello, Niccolò (Rondinello da Ravenna), Life, 264-265. 266
- Rosselli, Bernardo (Bernardo del Buda), 116
- Rosselli, Cosimo, 88, 229
- Rossi, Francesco de' (Francesco Salviati), 119
- Rossi, Giovan Battista de' (Il Rosso), Life, 189-203. 97
- Rossi, Madonna Properzia de', Life, 123-128
- Rosso, Il (Giovan Battista de' Rossi), Life, 189-203. 97
- Rovezzano, Benedetto da, Life, 35-38
- Rozzo, Antonio del (Antonio del Tozzo), 73
- Salviati, Francesco (Francesco de' Rossi), 119
- San Daniele, Pellegrino da (Martino da Udine, or Martino di Battista), 145-150
- San Gallo, Antonio da (the elder), 97
- San Gallo, Antonio da (the younger), 29, 43, 58, 72
- San Gallo, Francesco da, 27
- San Gallo, Giuliano da, 97
- San Gallo, Sebastiano (Aristotele) da, 97
- San Gimignano, Vincenzio da (Vincenzio Tamagni), Life, 11-17
- San Marco, Fra Bartolommeo di (Baccio della Porta), 159, 160, 194
- Sandrino del Calzolaio, 161, 165
- Sandro, Jacopo di, 97
- Sandro, Pier Francesco di Jacopo di, 118, 119
- Sansovino, Andrea (Andrea dal Monte Sansovino, or Andrea Contucci), Life, 21-31. 43, 88
- Sansovino, Jacopo, 5, 31, 35, 36, 80, 88, 92, 93, 97, 98, 180, 218, 231, 247
- Santa Croce, Girolamo, Life, 137-138
- Santi Titi dal Borgo, 160
- Sanzio, Raffaello (Raffaello da Urbino), 11-15, 55, 56, 66, 72, 77-81, 107-109, 117, 126, 169, 175, 191, 194, 201, 207, 208, 213, 222, 245, 247
- Sarto, Andrea del (Andrea d' Agnolo), Life, 85-120. 164, 194, 217-221, 231
- Schizzone, 12
- Sebastiano (Aristotele) da San Gallo, 97
- Sebastiano Florigerio (Bastianello Florigorio), 148
- Sebastiano Serlio, 72
- Sebastiano Viniziano del Piombo, Fra, 66
- Serlio, Sebastiano, 72
- Sesto, Cesare da (Cesare da Milano), 65, 141
- Sguazzella, Andrea, 100, 118
- Siena, Francesco da, 71, 73
- Siena, Michelagnolo da, Life, 136-137. 69
- Silvio Cosini, 6-8
- Simone Cioli, 30
- Simone del Pollaiuolo (Il Cronaca), 22
- Simone Mosca, 44
- Simone of Paris, 201
- Sodoma (Giovanni Antonio Bazzi), 73
- Sofonisba Anguisciuola, 127, 128
- Soggi, Niccolò, 109, 110, 196
- Sogliani, Giovanni Antonio, Life, 159-166. 51
- Solosmeo (Antonio di Giovanni), 118
- Spadari, Benedetto, 195, 196
- Stagio da Pietrasanta, 162
- Stefano Lunetti (Stefano of Florence), 51
- Tamagni, Vincenzio (Vincenzio da San Gimignano), Life, 11-17
- Tasso, Giuliano del, 97
- Tasso, Leonardo del, 31
- Timoteo da Urbino (Timoteo della Vite), Life, 11-17
- Titi dal Borgo, Santi, 160
- Tiziano da Cadore (Tiziano Vecelli), 66, 133, 134, 152, 153
- Tommaso di Stefano Lunetti, 51, 52, 164, 231
- Tozzo, Antonio del (Antonio del Rozzo), 73
- Trento, Antonio da (Antonio Fantuzzi), 249, 250
- Treviso, Girolamo da (Girolamo Trevigi), Life, 169-171. 68
- Tribolo (Niccolò), 6, 28, 136, 233
- Ubertini, Francesco (Francesco d' Albertino, or Il Bacchiacca), 222
- Udine, Giovanni da (Giovanni Martini), 145-147
- Udine, Giovanni da (Giovanni Nanni, or Giovanni Ricamatori), 77, 155, 175, 229, 238, 246
- Udine, Martino da (Pellegrino da San Daniele, or Martino di Battista), 145-150
- Urbino, Bramante da, 26, 28, 29, 65, 68, 69
- Urbino, Raffaello da (Raffaello Sanzio), 11-15, 55, 56, 66, 72, 77-81, 107-109, 117, 126, 169, 175, 191, 194, 201, 207, 208, 213, 222, 245, 247
- Urbino, Timoteo da (Timoteo della Vite), Life, 11-17
- Vaga, Perino del (Perino Buonaccorsi), 7, 77-79, 153, 162
- Valerio Vicentino (Valerio de' Belli), 247
- Vannucci, Pietro (Pietro Perugino), 49, 50, 87, 230
- Vasari, Giorgio—
- as an art collector, 17, 22, 24, 38, 45, 49, 74, 77, 79, 104, 118, 126, 128, 165, 196, 197, 201, 209, 213, 219, 250-252, 256
- as the author, 3-5, 7, 11, 12, 17, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 35, 45, 63, 66, 69, 73, 91, 96, 98, 108, 112, 114, 120, 126, 128, 132, 134, 135, 139, 145, 146, 148, 155, 177, 182, 185, 192, 194, 199, 201, 210-213, 223, 230, 232, 238, 247, 250, 251, 253-255, 259, 260, 264
- as an artist, 36, 80, 119, 135, 163, 232, 233, 265
- as an architect, 233, 250, 251
- Vecchio, Palma (Jacopo Palma), Life, 259-261
- Vecelli, Tiziano (Tiziano da Cadore), 66, 133, 134, 152, 153
- Vercelli, Bernardo da, 151
- Verrocchio, Andrea, 49, 50, 55
- Vetraio, Giovan Francesco (Giovan Francesco Bembo), 180
- Vicentino, Valerio (Valerio de' Belli), 247
- Vincenzio Caccianimici, 255, 256
- Vincenzio da San Gimignano (Vincenzio Tamagni), Life, 11-17
- Vincenzio Tamagni (Vincenzio da San Gimignano), Life, 11-17
- Vinci, Leonardo da, 49, 50, 86, 228, 261
- Viniziano, Agostino, 97
- Virgilio Romano, 73
- Visino, 223
- Vite, Timoteo della (Timoteo da Urbino), Life, 11-17
- Vitruvius, 68, 71
- Vittoria, Alessandro, 247
- Volterra, Piero da, 64
- Volterra, Zaccaria da, 45, 132
- Zaccaria da Volterra, 45, 132
- Zaganelli, Francesco de' (Francesco da Cotignola), Life, 265-266
- Zanobi di Poggino, 165
- Zanobi Poggini, 106
END OF VOL. V.
PRINTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF CHAS. T. JACOBI OF THE CHISWICK PRESS, LONDON. THE COLOURED REPRODUCTIONS ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BY HENRY STONE AND SON, LTD., BANBURY
PRINTED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF CHAS. T. JACOBI OF THE CHISWICK PRESS, LONDON. THE COLOURED REPRODUCTIONS ENGRAVED AND PRINTED BY HENRY STONE AND SON, LTD., BANBURY
FOOTNOTES
[4] Diminutive of Lorenzo.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Short form of Lorenzo.
[5] Luini.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Luini.
[6] Jacques de Beaune.
[11] I.e., singular or rare.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ i.e., singular or rare.
[14] Amatrice.
Amatrice.
Transcriber's note: Bold text is marked with =."
Transcriber's note: Bold text is marked with =."
Obvious printer's errors have been corrected, all other inconsistencies are as in the original. The author's spelling has been maintained.
Obvious printing mistakes have been fixed, all other inconsistencies remain as in the original. The author's spelling has been preserved.
"Elecate" should be "Elacate".
"Elecate" should be "Elacate".
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!