This is a modern-English version of The Life of George Washington: A Linked Index to the Project Gutenberg Editions, originally written by Marshall, John. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.






THE LIFE OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON





By John Marshall

(1755-1835)





Compiled by David Widger





MARSHAL





CONTENTS

Click on the ## before each title to go directly to a
linked index of the detailed chapters and illustrations

Please provide the text you would like modernized.  Volume I.

Please provide the text to modernize.  Volume II.

Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.  Volume III.

Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.  Volume IV.

Please provide the text you would like me to modernize.  Volume V.










VOLUMES, CHAPTERS AND STORIES





LIFE OF WASHINGTON, Volume I.


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Commission of Cabot.... His voyage to America.... Views of discovery relinquished by Henry VII.... Resumed by Elizabeth.... Letters patent to Sir Humphry Gilbert.... His voyages and death.... Patent to Sir Walter Raleigh.... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.... Colonists carried back to England by Drake.... Grenville arrives with other colonists.... They are left on Roanoke Island.... Are destroyed by the Indians.... Arrival of John White.... He returns to England for succour.... Raleigh assigns his patent.... Patent to Sir Thomas Gates and others.... Code of laws for the proposed colony drawn up by the King.

Commission of Cabot.... His voyage to America.... Discovery plans dropped by Henry VII.... Picked up again by Elizabeth.... Letters patent granted to Sir Humphry Gilbert.... His voyages and death.... Patent given to Sir Walter Raleigh.... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.... Colonists taken back to England by Drake.... Grenville arrives with more colonists.... They are left on Roanoke Island.... Are killed by the Indians.... Arrival of John White.... He returns to England for help.... Raleigh assigns his patent.... Patent given to Sir Thomas Gates and others.... Code of laws for the proposed colony created by the King.

CHAPTER II.

Voyage of Newport.... Settlement at Jamestown.... Distress of colonists.... Smith.... He is captured by the Indians.... Condemned to death, saved by Pocahontas.... Returns to Jamestown.... Newport arrives with fresh settlers.... Smith explores the Chesapeake.... Is chosen president.... New charter.... Third voyage of Newport.... Smith sails for Europe.... Condition of the colony.... Colonists determine to abandon the country.... Are stopped by Lord Delaware.... Sir Thomas Dale.... New charter.... Capt. Argal seizes Pocahontas.... She marries Mr. Rolf.... Separate property in lands and labour.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Manhadoes.... Fifty acres of land for each settler.... Tobacco.... Sir Thomas Dale.... Mr. Yeardley.... First assembly.... First arrival of females.... Of convicts.... Of African slaves.... Two councils established.... Prosperity of the colony.... Indians attempt to massacre the whites.... General war.... Dissolution of the company.... Arbitrary measures of the crown.... Sir John Harvey.... Sir William Berkeley.... Provincial assembly restored.... Virginia declares in favour of Charles II.... Grant to Lord Baltimore.... Arrival of a colony in Maryland.... Assembly composed of freemen.... William Claybourne.... Assembly composed of representatives.... Divided into two branches.... Tyrannical proceedings.

Voyage of Newport... Settlement at Jamestown... Struggles of the colonists... Smith... He is captured by the Indians... Sentenced to death, saved by Pocahontas... Returns to Jamestown... Newport arrives with new settlers... Smith explores the Chesapeake... Is elected president... New charter... Third voyage of Newport... Smith sails for Europe... Condition of the colony... Colonists decide to leave the country... Are stopped by Lord Delaware... Sir Thomas Dale... New charter... Capt. Argal captures Pocahontas... She marries Mr. Rolf... Separate ownership of land and labor... Expedition against Port Royal... Against Manhadoes... Fifty acres of land for each settler... Tobacco... Sir Thomas Dale... Mr. Yeardley... First assembly... First arrival of women... Of convicts... Of African slaves... Two councils established... Prosperity of the colony... Indians try to massacre the settlers... General war... Dissolution of the company... Arbitrary actions of the crown... Sir John Harvey... Sir William Berkeley... Provincial assembly restored... Virginia declares support for Charles II... Grant to Lord Baltimore... Arrival of a colony in Maryland... Assembly made up of freemen... William Claybourne... Assembly made up of representatives... Divided into two branches... Tyrannical actions.

CHAPTER III.

First ineffectual attempts of the Plymouth company to settle the country.... Settlement at New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and company.... New charter.... Settlements prosecuted vigorously.... Government transferred to the colonists.... Boston founded.... Religious intolerance.... General court established.... Royal commission for the government of the plantations.... Contest with the French colony of Acadié.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchison.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the patent of the colony.... Religious dissensions.... Providence settled.... Rhode Island settled.... Connecticut settled.... War with the Pequods.... New Haven settled.

First unsuccessful attempts by the Plymouth Company to establish a settlement in the area.... Settlement in New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and his associates.... New charter.... Settlements pursued actively.... Government transferred to the colonists.... Boston founded.... Religious intolerance.... General Court established.... Royal commission for governing the plantations.... Conflict with the French colony of Acadia.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchinson.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the colony's patent.... Religious disputes.... Providence founded.... Rhode Island founded.... Connecticut founded.... War with the Pequots.... New Haven founded.

CHAPTER IV.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine.... Dissensions among the inhabitants.... Confederation of the New England colonies.... Rhode Island excluded from it.... Separate chambers provided for the two branches of the Legislature.... New England takes part with Parliament.... Treaty with Acadié.... Petition of the non-conformists.... Disputes between Massachusetts and Connecticut.... War between England and Holland.... Machinations of the Dutch at Manhadoes among the Indians.... Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war.... Application of New Haven to Cromwell for assistance.... Peace with the Dutch.... Expedition of Sedgewic against Acadié.... Religious intolerance.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine. There are conflicts among the residents. The New England colonies form a confederation, but Rhode Island is left out. Separate chambers are set up for the two branches of the Legislature. New England supports Parliament. A treaty is made with Acadié. Non-conformists submit a petition. There are disputes between Massachusetts and Connecticut. There's a war between England and Holland, with the Dutch scheming at Manhadoes among the Indians. Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war. New Haven asks Cromwell for help. There’s peace with the Dutch. Sedgewic leads an expedition against Acadié. There's religious intolerance.

CHAPTER V.

Transactions succeeding the restoration of Charles II.... Contests between Connecticut and New Haven.... Discontents in Virginia.... Grant to the Duke of York.... Commissioners appointed by the crown.... Conquest of the Dutch settlements.... Conduct of Massachusetts to the royal commissioners.... Their recall.... Massachusetts evades a summons to appear before the King and council.... Settlement of Carolina.... Form of government.... Constitution of Mr. Locke.... Discontents in the county of Albemarle.... Invasion from Florida.... Abolition of the constitution of Mr. Locke.... Bacon's rebellion.... His death.... Assembly deprived of judicial power.... Discontents in Virginia.... Population of the colony.

Transactions after the restoration of Charles II... Conflicts between Connecticut and New Haven... Unrest in Virginia... Grant to the Duke of York... Commissioners appointed by the crown... Conquest of the Dutch settlements... Massachusetts' response to the royal commissioners... Their recall... Massachusetts avoids a summons to appear before the King and council... Settlement of Carolina... Form of government... Constitution by Mr. Locke... Unrest in the county of Albemarle... Invasion from Florida... Abolishment of Mr. Locke's constitution... Bacon's rebellion... His death... Assembly stripped of judicial power... Unrest in Virginia... Population of the colony.

CHAPTER VI.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine adjudged to Gorges.... Purchased by Massachusetts.... Royal government erected in New Hampshire.... Complaints against Massachusetts.... Their letters patent cancelled.... Death of Charles II.... James II. proclaimed.... New commission for the government of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island abrogated.... Odious measures of the new government.... Andros deposed.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of proceedings in New York and the Jerseys.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Frame of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia laid.... Assembly convened.... First acts of the legislature.... Boundary line with Lord Baltimore settled.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine assigned to Gorges.... Bought by Massachusetts.... Royal government established in New Hampshire.... Complaints about Massachusetts.... Their charter canceled.... Death of Charles II.... James II proclaimed.... New commission for the government of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island revoked.... Unpopular actions of the new government.... Andros removed.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of events in New York and the Jerseys.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Structure of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia established.... Assembly convened.... First actions of the legislature.... Boundary line with Lord Baltimore resolved.

CHAPTER VII.

New charter of Massachusetts.... Affairs of New York.... War with France.... Schenectady destroyed.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Quebec.... Acadié recovered by France.... Pemaquid taken.... Attempt on St. Johns.... Peace.... Affairs of New York.... Of Virginia.... Disputes between England and France respecting boundary in America.... Recommencement of hostilities.... Quotas of the respective colonies.... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Incursion into Massachusetts.... Plan for the invasion of Canada.... Port Royal taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Treaty of Utrecht.... Affairs of New York.... Of Carolina.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Attempt to establish the Episcopal church.... Invasion of the colony.... Bills of credit issued.... Legislature continues itself.... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians.... Tuscaroras defeated.... Scheme of a Bank.

New charter of Massachusetts... Issues in New York... War with France... Schenectady destroyed... Expedition against Port Royal... Attack on Quebec... Acadié taken back by France... Pemaquid captured... Attempt on St. Johns... Peace... Issues in New York... In Virginia... Disputes between England and France over boundaries in America... Resumption of hostilities... Quotas from the respective colonies... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations... Expedition against Port Royal... Raid into Massachusetts... Plan for invading Canada... Port Royal captured... Expedition against Quebec... Treaty of Utrecht... Issues in New York... In Carolina... Expedition against St. Augustine... Effort to establish the Episcopal church... Invasion of the colony... Bills of credit issued... Legislature continues itself... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians... Tuscaroras defeated... Proposal for a bank.

CHAPTER VIII.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... Intrigues of the French among the Indians.... War with the savages.... Peace.... Controversy with the governor.... Decided in England.... Contests concerning the governor's salary.... The assembly adjourned to Salem.... Contest concerning the salary terminated.... Great depreciation of the paper currency.... Scheme of a land bank.... Company dissolved by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Review of transactions in New York.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... French intrigues among the Indigenous peoples.... War with the Native Americans.... Peace.... Dispute with the governor.... Resolved in England.... Disagreements over the governor's salary.... The assembly moved to Salem.... Salary dispute resolved.... Significant decline in the value of paper currency.... Proposal for a land bank.... Company dissolved by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Overview of events in New York.

CHAPTER IX.

War with the southern Indians.... Dissatisfaction of Carolina with the proprietors.... Rupture with Spain.... Combination to subvert the proprietary government.... Revolution completed.... Expedition from the Havanna against Charleston.... Peace with Spain.... The proprietors surrender their interest to the crown.... The province divided.... Georgia settled.... Impolicy of the first regulations.... Intrigues of the Spaniards with the slaves of South Carolina.... Insurrection of the slaves.

War with the southern Native Americans... Dissatisfaction of Carolina with the proprietors... Break with Spain... A coalition to overthrow the proprietary government... Revolution completed... Expedition from Havana against Charleston... Peace with Spain... The proprietors give up their interest to the crown... The province divided... Georgia settled... Poor decisions of the initial regulations... Intrigues of the Spaniards with the slaves of South Carolina... Slave insurrection.

CHAPTER X.

War declared against Spain.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Georgia invaded.... Spaniards land on an island in the Alatamaha.... Appearance of a fleet from Charleston.... Spanish army re-embarks.... Hostilities with France.... Expedition against Louisbourg.... Louisbourg surrenders.... Great plans of the belligerent powers.... Misfortunes of the armament under the duke D'Anville.... The French fleet dispersed by a storm.... Expedition against Nova Scotia.... Treaty of Aix la Chapelle.... Paper money of Massachusetts redeemed.... Contests between the French and English respecting boundaries.... Statement respecting the discovery of the Mississippi.... Scheme for connecting Louisiana with Canada.... Relative strength of the French and English colonies.... Defeat at the Little Meadows.... Convention at Albany.... Plan of union.... Objected to both in America and Great Britain.

War was declared against Spain... Expedition against St. Augustine... Georgia was invaded... Spaniards landed on an island in the Alatamaha... Appearance of a fleet from Charleston... The Spanish army re-embarked... Conflicts with France... Expedition against Louisbourg... Louisbourg surrendered... Ambitious plans of the warring powers... Misfortunes of the armament under Duke D'Anville... The French fleet was scattered by a storm... Expedition against Nova Scotia... Treaty of Aix la Chapelle... Massachusetts' paper money was redeemed... Disputes between the French and English over boundaries... Statement about the discovery of the Mississippi... Plan to connect Louisiana with Canada... Relative strength of the French and English colonies... Defeat at the Little Meadows... Convention at Albany... Plan of union... Objected to in both America and Great Britain.

CHAPTER XI.

General Braddock arrives.... Convention of governors and plan of the campaign.... French expelled from Nova Scotia, and inhabitants transplanted.... Expedition against fort Du Quêsne.... Battle of Monongahela.... Defeat and death of General Braddock.... Expedition against Crown Point.... Dieskau defeated.... Expedition against Niagara.... Frontiers distressed by the Indians.... Meeting of the governors at New York.... Plan for the campaign of 1756.... Lord Loudoun arrives.... Montcalm takes Oswego.... Lord Loudoun abandons offensive operations.... Small-pox breaks out in Albany.... Campaign of 1757 opened.... Admiral Holbourne arrives at Halifax.... Is joined by the earl of Loudoun.... Expedition against Louisbourg relinquished.... Lord Loudoun returns to New York.... Fort William Henry taken.... Controversy between Lord Loudoun and the assembly of Massachusetts.

General Braddock arrives.... A convention of governors and a campaign plan.... The French are expelled from Nova Scotia, and the inhabitants are relocated.... An expedition against Fort Duquesne.... The Battle of Monongahela.... General Braddock is defeated and killed.... An expedition against Crown Point.... Dieskau is defeated.... An expedition against Niagara.... The frontiers are troubled by the Indians.... A meeting of the governors in New York.... A plan for the 1756 campaign.... Lord Loudoun arrives.... Montcalm captures Oswego.... Lord Loudoun gives up offensive operations.... Smallpox breaks out in Albany.... The 1757 campaign begins.... Admiral Holbourne arrives in Halifax.... He is joined by the Earl of Loudoun.... The expedition against Louisbourg is canceled.... Lord Loudoun returns to New York.... Fort William Henry is captured.... A controversy arises between Lord Loudoun and the Massachusetts assembly.

CHAPTER XII.

Preparations for the campaign of 1758.... Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive at Halifax.... Plan of the campaign.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie repulsed under the walls of Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontignac taken.... Expedition against Fort Du Quêsne.... Preparations for the campaign of 1759.... General Amherst succeeds General Abercrombie.... Plan of the campaign.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point taken.... Army goes into winter quarters.... French repulsed at Oswego.... Defeated at Niagara.... Niagara taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Check to the English army.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Death of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec capitulates.... Garrisoned by the English under the command of General Murray.... Attempt to recover Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec besieged by Monsieur Levi.... Siege raised.... Montreal capitulates.... War with the southern Indians.... Battle near the town of Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... Success of the English.... Peace.

Preparations for the 1758 campaign.... Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive in Halifax.... Campaign plan.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie is pushed back near Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontenac captured.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Preparations for the 1759 campaign.... General Amherst takes over from General Abercrombie.... Campaign plan.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point captured.... Army settles into winter quarters.... French pushed back at Oswego.... Defeated at Niagara.... Niagara captured.... Expedition against Quebec.... Setback for the English army.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Death of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec surrenders.... Garrisoned by the English under General Murray's command.... Attempt to reclaim Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec besieged by Monsieur Lévis.... Siege lifted.... Montreal surrenders.... War with the southern Indians.... Battle near Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... Success for the English.... Peace.

CHAPTER XIII.

Opinions on the supremacy of parliament, and its right to tax the colonies.... The stamp act.... Congress at New York.... Violence in the towns.... Change of administration.... Stamp act repealed.... Opposition to the mutiny act.... Act imposing duties on tea, &c., resisted in America.... Letters from the assembly of Massachusetts to members of the administration.... Petition to the King.... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies.... Letter from the Earl of Hillsborough.... Assembly of Massachusetts dissolved.... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty.... Convention at Fanueil Hall.... Moderation of its proceedings.... Two British regiments arrive at Boston.... Resolutions of the house of Burgesses of Virginia.... Assembly dissolved.... The members form an association.... General measures against importation.... General court convened in Massachusetts.... Its proceedings.... Is prorogued.... Duties, except that on tea, repealed.... Circular letter of the earl of Hillsborough.... New York recedes from the non-importation agreement in part.... Her example followed.... Riot in Boston.... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

Opinions on the supremacy of parliament and its right to tax the colonies... The Stamp Act... Congress in New York... Violence in the towns... Change of administration... Stamp Act repealed... Opposition to the Mutiny Act... Act imposing duties on tea, etc., resisted in America... Letters from the Massachusetts assembly to members of the administration... Petition to the King... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies... Letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... Massachusetts assembly dissolved... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty... Convention at Faneuil Hall... Moderation of its proceedings... Two British regiments arrive in Boston... Resolutions from the Virginia House of Burgesses... Assembly dissolved... The members form an association... General measures against importation... General Court convened in Massachusetts... Its proceedings... Is prorogued... Duties, except for the one on tea, repealed... Circular letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... New York partially withdraws from the non-importation agreement... Her example followed... Riot in Boston... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

CHAPTER XIV.

Insurrection in North Carolina.... Dissatisfaction of Massachusetts.... Corresponding-committees.... Governor Hutchinson's correspondence communicated by Dr. Franklin.... The assembly petition for his removal.... He is succeeded by General Gage.... Measures to enforce the act concerning duties.... Ferment in America.... The tea thrown into the sea at Boston.... Measures of Parliament.... General enthusiasm in America.... A general congress proposed.... General Gage arrives.... Troops stationed on Boston neck.... New counsellors and judges.... Obliged to resign.... Boston neck fortified.... Military stores seized by General Gage.... Preparations for defence.... King's speech.... Proceedings of Parliament.... Battle of Lexington.... Massachusetts raises men.... Meeting of Congress.... Proceedings of that body.... Transactions in Virginia.... Provincial congress of South Carolina.... Battle of Breed's hill.

Insurrection in North Carolina... Discontent in Massachusetts... Corresponding committees... Governor Hutchinson's correspondence shared by Dr. Franklin... The assembly petitions for his removal... He is replaced by General Gage... Actions to enforce the duties act... Unrest in America... Tea dumped into the sea at Boston... Parliamentary actions... Widespread enthusiasm in America... A general congress is proposed... General Gage arrives... Troops stationed on Boston Neck... New counselors and judges... Forced to resign... Boston Neck fortified... Military supplies seized by General Gage... Preparations for defense... King's speech... Parliament's actions... Battle of Lexington... Massachusetts raises troops... Meeting of Congress... Proceedings of that body... Events in Virginia... Provincial congress of South Carolina... Battle of Breed's Hill.

NOTES

Footnotes


ILLUSTRATIONS

General Washington

Ruins of the Old Brick Church Built at Jamestown In 1639

Plymouth, Massachusetts, in 1622

Penn Seeking Freedom for Imprisoned Friends

Great Meadows and the Site of Fort Necessity

General Braddock's Grave

The Death of Wolfe on the Plains Of Abraham

The Boston Tea Party










LIFE OF WASHINGTON, Volume II.


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French on the Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Capitulation of fort Necessity.... Is appointed aid-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Is appointed to the command of a regiment.... Extreme distress of the frontiers, and exertions of Colonel Washington to augment the regular forces of the colony.... Expedition against fort Du Quesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Du Quesne evacuated by the French, and taken possession of by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French on the Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Surrender of Fort Necessity.... Appointed as aid-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Appointed to lead a regiment.... Severe challenges on the frontiers, and Colonel Washington's efforts to increase the colonial regular forces.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Duquesne evacuated by the French and taken over by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

CHAPTER II.

Colonel Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces.... Arrives at Cambridge.... Strength and disposition of the two armies.... Deficiency of the Americans in arms and ammunitions.... Falmouth burnt.... Success of the American cruisers.... Distress of the British from the want of fresh provisions.... Measures to form a continental army.... Difficulty of re-enlisting the troops.... Plan for attacking Boston.... General Lee detached to New York.... Possession taken of the heights of Dorchester.... Boston evacuated.... Correspondence respecting prisoners.

Colonel Washington was appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces. He arrived at Cambridge. The strength and positioning of the two armies were assessed. The Americans were lacking in arms and ammunition. Falmouth was burned. The American cruisers had success. The British were struggling due to a lack of fresh provisions. Steps were taken to form a continental army. There was difficulty in re-enlisting the troops. A plan was developed to attack Boston. General Lee was sent to New York. The heights of Dorchester were taken. Boston was evacuated. There was correspondence regarding prisoners.

CHAPTER III.

Invasion of Canada meditated.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's capitulated.... Montreal surrenders.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives before Quebec.... Retires to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.... Unsuccessful attack on that place.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes command of the army.... The blockade raised.... General Sullivan takes the command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada evacuated.... General Carleton constructs a fleet.... Enters lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes possession of Crown Point.... Retires into winter quarters.

Invasion of Canada planned.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of Fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's surrenders.... Montreal capitulates.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives before Quebec.... Withdraws to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.... Unsuccessful attack on that location.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes command of the army.... The blockade is lifted.... General Sullivan takes command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada is evacuated.... General Carleton builds a fleet.... Enters Lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes control of Crown Point.... Retreats into winter quarters.

CHAPTER IV.

Transaction in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet repulsed at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Measures leading to Independence.... Independence declared.

Transaction in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet pushed back at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Steps leading to Independence.... Independence declared.

CHAPTER V.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive before New York.... Circular letter of Lord Howe.... State of the American Army.... The British land in force on Long Island.... Battle of Brooklyn.... Evacuation of Long Island.... Fruitless negotiations.... New York evacuated.... Skirmish on the heights of Haerlem.... Letter on the state of the army.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive in New York... Circular letter from Lord Howe... Status of the American Army... The British land heavily on Long Island... Battle of Brooklyn... Evacuation of Long Island... Unsuccessful negotiations... New York evacuated... Skirmish in the Heights of Harlem... Letter about the state of the army.

CHAPTER VI.

The British land at Frog's Neck.... The American army evacuates York Island, except fort Washington.... Both armies move towards the White Plains.... Battle of the White Plains.... The British army returns to Kingsbridge.... General Washington crosses the North river.... The lines of fort Washington carried by the British, and the garrison made prisoners.... Evacuation of fort Lee.... Weakness of the American army.... Ineffectual attempts to raise the militia.... General Washington retreats through Jersey.... General Washington crosses the Delaware.... Danger of Philadelphia.... Capture of General Lee.... The British go into winter quarters.... Battle of Trenton.... Of Princeton.... Firmness of congress.

The British land at Frog's Neck... The American army leaves York Island, except for Fort Washington... Both armies head toward the White Plains... Battle of the White Plains... The British army goes back to Kingsbridge... General Washington crosses the North River... The British capture Fort Washington, and the garrison is taken prisoner... Evacuation of Fort Lee... Weakness of the American army... Ineffective attempts to rally the militia... General Washington retreats through New Jersey... General Washington crosses the Delaware... Philadelphia in danger... Capture of General Lee... The British settle into winter quarters... Battle of Trenton... Of Princeton... Congress remains steadfast.

CHAPTER VII.

American army inoculated.... General Heath moves to Kingsbridge.... Returns to Peekskill.... Skirmishes.... State of the army.... Destruction of stores at Peekskill.... At Danbury.... Expedition to Sagg Harbour.... Camp formed at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Attempts to cut off the retreat of the American army to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis skirmishes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescott surprised and taken.... The British army embarks.

American army vaccination.... General Heath moves to Kingsbridge.... Returns to Peekskill.... Skirmishes.... Condition of the army.... Destruction of supplies at Peekskill.... At Danbury.... Expedition to Sagg Harbour.... Camp set up at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Attempts to block the retreat of the American army to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis skirmishes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescott is surprised and captured.... The British army embarks.

CHAPTER VIII.

General Washington commences his march to the Delaware.... Takes measures for checking Burgoyne.... British army land at Elk River.... General Washington advances to Brandywine.... Retreat of Maxwell.... Defeat at Brandywine.... Slight skirmish near the White Horse, and retreat to French Creek.... General Wayne surprised.... General Howe takes possession of Philadelphia.... Removal of Congress to Lancaster.

General Washington starts his march to the Delaware... Takes steps to stop Burgoyne... The British army lands at Elk River... General Washington moves to Brandywine... Maxwell retreats... Defeat at Brandywine... A small skirmish near the White Horse, and retreat to French Creek... General Wayne gets caught by surprise... General Howe takes control of Philadelphia... Congress moves to Lancaster.

CHAPTER IX.

Measures to cut off the communication between the British army and fleet.... Battle of Germantown.... Measures to intercept supplies to Philadelphia.... Attack on fort Mifflin.... On Red Bank.... The Augusta blows up.... Fort Mifflin evacuated.... Fort Mercer evacuated.... The British open the communication with their fleet.... Washington urged to attack Philadelphia.... General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill.... Returns to Philadelphia.... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

Measures to cut off communication between the British army and fleet.... Battle of Germantown.... Actions taken to intercept supplies to Philadelphia.... Attack on Fort Mifflin.... At Red Bank.... The Augusta explodes.... Fort Mifflin is evacuated.... Fort Mercer is evacuated.... The British establish communication with their fleet.... Washington is urged to attack Philadelphia.... General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill.... Returns to Philadelphia.... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

CHAPTER X.

Inquiry into the conduct of General Schuyler.... Burgoyne appears before Ticonderoga.... Evacuation of that place,... of Skeensborough.... Colonel Warner defeated.... Evacuation of fort Anne.... Proclamation of Burgoyne.... Counter-proclamation of Schuyler.... Burgoyne approaches fort Edward.... Schuyler retires to Saratoga,... to Stillwater.... St. Leger invests fort Schuyler.... Herkimer defeated.... Colonel Baum detached to Bennington.... is defeated.... Brechman defeated.... St. Leger abandons the siege of fort Schuyler.... Murder of Miss M'Crea.... General Gates takes command.... Burgoyne encamps on the heights of Saratoga.... Battle of Stillwater.... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga.... Capitulates.... The British take forts Montgomery and Clinton.... The forts Independence and Constitution evacuated by the Americans.... Ticonderoga evacuated by the British.

Inquiry into the conduct of General Schuyler.... Burgoyne shows up at Ticonderoga.... Evacuation of that location,... of Skeensborough.... Colonel Warner is defeated.... Evacuation of Fort Anne.... Proclamation from Burgoyne.... Counter-proclamation from Schuyler.... Burgoyne approaches Fort Edward.... Schuyler moves to Saratoga,... then to Stillwater.... St. Leger lays siege to Fort Schuyler.... Herkimer is defeated.... Colonel Baum is sent to Bennington.... is defeated.... Brechman is defeated.... St. Leger lifts the siege of Fort Schuyler.... Murder of Miss M'Crea.... General Gates takes command.... Burgoyne sets up camp on the heights of Saratoga.... Battle of Stillwater.... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga.... Surrenders.... The British capture Forts Montgomery and Clinton.... The Americans evacuate Forts Independence and Constitution.... Ticonderoga is evacuated by the British.

CHAPTER XI.

Defects in the Commissary departments.... Distress of the army at Valley Forge.... The army subsisted by impressments.... Combination in congress against General Washington.... Correspondence between him and General Gates.... Distress of the army for clothes.... Washington's exertions to augment the army.... Congress sends a committee to camp.... Attempt to surprise Captain Lee.... Congress determines on a second expedition to Canada.... Abandons it.... General Conway resigns.... The Baron Steuben appointed Inspector General.... Congress forbids the embarkation of Burgoyne's army.... Plan of reconciliation agreed to in Parliament.... Communicated to congress and rejected.... Information of treaties between France and the United States.... Complaints of the treatment of prisoners.... A partial exchange agreed to.

Defects in the Commissary departments... The army's struggles at Valley Forge... The army survived through impressments... A conspiracy in Congress against General Washington... Correspondence between him and General Gates... The army's need for clothing... Washington's efforts to strengthen the army... Congress sends a committee to the camp... An attempt to surprise Captain Lee... Congress decides on a second expedition to Canada... Abandoning it... General Conway resigns... The Baron Steuben is appointed Inspector General... Congress prohibits the embarkation of Burgoyne's army... A reconciliation plan agreed upon in Parliament... Communicated to Congress and rejected... News of treaties between France and the United States... Complaints about the treatment of prisoners... A partial exchange agreed upon.

NOTES

Footnotes


ILLUSTRATIONS

Wakefield—the Birthplace of George Washington

The Washington Family Burial Ground

The Historic Washington Elm at Cambridge, Massachusetts

Independence Hall, Philadelphia

Washington's Headquarters at White Plains

Washington Crossing the Delaware

The Saratoga Battle Monument

Washington's Headquarters at Valley Forge










LIFE OF WASHINGTON, Volume III.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy surprised.... Attempt on Lafayette at Barren hill.... General Howe resigns the command of the British army.... Is succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuates Philadelphia, and marches through the Jerseys.... A council of war which decides against attacking the British on their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee arrested.... Sentenced to be suspended for one year.... Thanks of Congress to General Washington and his army.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy surprises.... Attempt on Lafayette at Barren Hill.... General Howe resigns command of the British army.... He is succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuates Philadelphia and marches through the Jerseys.... A council of war decides against attacking the British on their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee is arrested.... He is sentenced to a one-year suspension.... Congress expresses gratitude to General Washington and his army.

CHAPTER II.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet.... Meditates an attack on the British fleet in New York harbour.... Relinquishes it.... Sails to Rhode Island.... Lord Howe appears off Rhode Island.... Both fleets dispersed by a storm.... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport.... D'Estaing returns.... Sails for Boston.... Sullivan expresses his dissatisfaction in general orders.... Raises the siege of Newport.... Action on Rhode Island.... The Americans retreat to the Continent.... Count D'Estaing expresses his dissatisfaction with Sullivan in a letter to congress.... General Washington labours successfully to heal these discontents.... Lord Howe resigns the command of the British fleet.... Colonel Baylor's regiment surprised.... Captain Donop defeated by Colonel Butler.... Expedition of the British against Egg Harbour.... Pulaski surprised.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet... thinks about attacking the British fleet in New York harbor... decides against it... sails to Rhode Island... Lord Howe shows up off Rhode Island... both fleets are scattered by a storm... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport... D'Estaing returns... sails for Boston... Sullivan expresses his dissatisfaction in general orders... lifts the siege of Newport... action on Rhode Island... the Americans retreat to the mainland... Count D'Estaing shares his disappointment with Sullivan in a letter to Congress... General Washington works hard to resolve these issues... Lord Howe resigns as commander of the British fleet... Colonel Baylor's regiment is caught off guard... Captain Donop is defeated by Colonel Butler... British expedition against Egg Harbor... Pulaski is surprised.

CHAPTER III.

Arrival of the British commissioners.... Terms of conciliation proposed.... Answer of congress to their propo[Pg iv]sitions.... Attempts of Mr. Johnson to bribe some members of congress.... His private letters ordered to be published.... Manifesto of the commissioners, and counter-manifesto of congress.... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, minister plenipotentiary of France.... Hostilities of the Indians.... Irruption into the Wyoming settlement.... Battle of Wyoming.... Colonel Dennison capitulates for the inhabitants.... Distress of the settlement.... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent.... Congress determines to invade Canada.... General Washington opposes the measure.... Induces congress to abandon it.

Arrival of the British commissioners.... Proposed terms for reconciliation.... Congress's response to their proposals.... Mr. Johnson's attempts to bribe some congress members.... His private letters were ordered to be published.... The commissioners' manifesto and Congress's counter-manifesto.... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, minister plenipotentiary of France.... Indian hostilities.... Attack on the Wyoming settlement.... Battle of Wyoming.... Colonel Dennison surrenders for the inhabitants.... Hardship in the settlement.... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent.... Congress decides to invade Canada.... General Washington opposes this decision.... He persuades Congress to abandon it.

CHAPTER IV.

Divisions in Congress.... Letters of General Washington on the state of public affairs.... Invasion of Georgia.... General Howe defeated by Colonel Campbell.... Savannah taken.... Sunbury surrenders.... Georgia reduced.... General Lincoln takes command of the Southern army.... Major Gardener defeated by General Moultrie.... Insurrection of the Tories in South Carolina.... They are defeated by Colonel Pickens.... Ash surprised and defeated.... Moultrie retreats.... Prevost marches to Charleston.... Lincoln attacks the British at Stono Ferry unsuccessfully.... Invasion of Virginia.

Divisions in Congress… Letters from General Washington about the state of public affairs… Invasion of Georgia… General Howe is defeated by Colonel Campbell… Savannah is captured… Sunbury surrenders… Georgia is brought under control… General Lincoln takes command of the Southern army… Major Gardener is defeated by General Moultrie… The Tories in South Carolina rise up… They are defeated by Colonel Pickens… Ash is ambushed and defeated… Moultrie retreats… Prevost marches to Charleston… Lincoln unsuccessfully attacks the British at Stono Ferry… Invasion of Virginia.

CHAPTER V.

Discontents in a part of the American army.... Letter from General Washington on the subject.... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Indian settlement.... Expedition against the Indians meditated.... Fort Fayette surrendered to the British.... Invasion of Connecticut.... General Wayne storms Stony Point.... Expedition against Penobscot.... Powles Hook surprised by Major Lee.... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot.... Of the Count D'Estaing.... Siege of Savannah.... Unsuccessful attempt to storm that place.... Siege raised.... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown.... Spain offers her me[Pg v]diation to the belligerents.... Declares war against England.... Letter from General Washington to congress respecting the annual formation of the army.... The army goes into winter quarters.

Discontent in part of the American army... Letter from General Washington on the matter... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Indian settlement... An expedition against the Indians is planned... Fort Fayette surrendered to the British... Invasion of Connecticut... General Wayne attacks Stony Point... Expedition against Penobscot... Powles Hook is ambushed by Major Lee... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot... Count D'Estaing... Siege of Savannah... Unsuccessful attempt to attack that place... Siege lifted... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown... Spain offers to mediate between the warring parties... Declares war on England... Letter from General Washington to Congress regarding the annual formation of the army... The army goes into winter quarters.

CHAPTER VI.

South Carolina invaded.... The British fleet passes the bar, and gets possession of the harbour of Charleston.... Opinion of General Washington on the propriety of defending that place.... Sir Henry Clinton invests the town.... Tarleton surprises an American corps at Monk's Corner.... Fort Moultrie surrendered.... Tarleton defeats Colonel White.... General Lincoln capitulates.... Buford defeated.... Arrangements for the government of South Carolina and Georgia.... Sir Henry Clinton embarks for New York.... General Gates takes command of the Southern army.... Is defeated near Camden.... Death of De Kalb.... Success of General Sumpter.... He is defeated.

South Carolina was invaded.... The British fleet passes the bar and takes control of the harbor in Charleston.... General Washington's views on whether to defend that location.... Sir Henry Clinton surrounds the town.... Tarleton catches an American unit by surprise at Monk's Corner.... Fort Moultrie surrenders.... Tarleton defeats Colonel White.... General Lincoln surrenders.... Buford is defeated.... Plans for the governance of South Carolina and Georgia.... Sir Henry Clinton sets sail for New York.... General Gates takes command of the Southern army.... He is defeated near Camden.... De Kalb dies.... General Sumpter achieves success.... He gets defeated.

CHAPTER VII.

Distress in the American camp.... Expedition against Staten Island.... Requisitions on the states.... New scheme of finance.... Committee of congress deputed to camp.... Resolution to make up depreciation of pay.... Mutiny in the line of Connecticut.... General Knyphausen enters Jersey.... Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York.... Skirmish at Springfield.... Exertions to strengthen the army.... Bank established in Philadelphia.... Contributions of the ladies.... Farther proceedings of the states.... Arrival of a French armament in Rhode Island.... Changes in the quartermaster's department.... Enterprise against New York abandoned.... Naval superiority of the British.

Distress in the American camp... Expedition against Staten Island... Requisitions on the states... New finance plan... Congress sends a committee to the camp... Resolution to compensate for pay depreciation... Mutiny in the Connecticut line... General Knyphausen enters New Jersey... Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York... Skirmish at Springfield... Efforts to strengthen the army... Bank established in Philadelphia... Contributions from the ladies... Further actions from the states... Arrival of a French military force in Rhode Island... Changes in the quartermaster's department... Mission against New York called off... British naval superiority.

CHAPTER VIII.

Treason and escape of Arnold.... Trial and execution of Major André.... Precautions for the security of West[Pg vi] Point.... Letter of General Washington on American affairs.... Proceedings of congress respecting the army.... Major Talmadge destroys the British stores at Coram.... The army retires into winter quarters.... Irruption of Major Carleton into New York.... European transactions.

Treason and escape of Arnold... Trial and execution of Major André... Precautions for the security of West[Pg vi] Point... Letter from General Washington about American affairs... Actions of congress regarding the army... Major Talmadge destroys British supplies at Coram... The army retreats to winter quarters... Major Carleton's incursion into New York... European events.

CHAPTER IX.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia.... Defeat of Ferguson.... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina.... Retreat out of that state.... Major Wemys defeated by Sumpter.... Tarleton repulsed.... Greene appointed to the command of the Southern army.... Arrives in camp.... Detaches Morgan over the Catawba.... Battle of the Cowpens.... Lord Cornwallis drives Greene through North Carolina into Virginia.... He retires to Hillsborough.... Greene recrosses the Dan.... Loyalists under Colonel Pyle cut to pieces.... Battle of Guilford.... Lord Cornwallis retires to Ramsay's mills.... To Wilmington.... Greene advances to Ramsay's mills.... Determines to enter South Carolina.... Lord Cornwallis resolves to march to Virginia.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia... Defeat of Ferguson... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina... Retreats out of that state... Major Wemys is defeated by Sumpter... Tarleton is pushed back... Greene is appointed to lead the Southern army... Arrives in camp... Sends Morgan over the Catawba... Battle of the Cowpens... Lord Cornwallis drives Greene through North Carolina into Virginia... He withdraws to Hillsborough... Greene recrosses the Dan... Loyalists under Colonel Pyle are wiped out... Battle of Guilford... Lord Cornwallis retreats to Ramsay's mills... Then to Wilmington... Greene advances to Ramsay's mills... Decides to enter South Carolina... Lord Cornwallis resolves to march to Virginia.

CHAPTER X.

Virginia invaded by Arnold.... He destroys the stores at Westham and at Richmond.... Retires to Portsmouth.... Mutiny in the Pennsylvania line.... Sir H. Clinton attempts to negotiate with the mutineers.... They compromise with the civil government.... Mutiny in the Jersey line.... Mission of Colonel Laurens to France.... Propositions to Spain.... Recommendations relative to a duty on imported and prize goods.... Reform in the Executive departments.... Confederation adopted.... Military transactions.... Lafayette detached to Virginia.... Cornwallis arrives.... Presses Lafayette.... Expedition to Charlottesville, to the Point of Fork.... Lafayette forms a junction with Wayne.... Cornwallis retires to the lower country.... General Washington's letters are intercepted.... Action near Jamestown.[Pg vii]

Virginia is invaded by Arnold. He destroys the supplies at Westham and Richmond. He then retreats to Portsmouth. There's a mutiny in the Pennsylvania line. Sir H. Clinton tries to negotiate with the mutineers, and they reach a compromise with the civil government. There's also a mutiny in the Jersey line. Colonel Laurens is sent to France on a mission. Proposals are made to Spain regarding a duty on imported and prize goods. There are recommendations for reform in the Executive departments. The Confederation is adopted. Military actions continue. Lafayette is sent to Virginia. Cornwallis arrives and pressures Lafayette. An expedition is launched to Charlottesville, at the Point of Fork. Lafayette joins forces with Wayne. Cornwallis retreats to the lower country. General Washington's letters are intercepted. There’s action near Jamestown.[Pg vii]

CHAPTER XI.

Farther state of affairs in the beginning of the year 1781.... Measures of Mr. Morris, the superintendent of finances.... Designs of General Washington against New York.... Count Rochambeau marches to the North River.... Intelligence from the Count de Grasse.... Plan of operations against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval engagement.... The combined armies march for the Chesapeake.... Yorktown invested.... Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.

Farther state of affairs in the beginning of the year 1781.... Measures of Mr. Morris, the superintendent of finances.... Plans of General Washington for New York.... Count Rochambeau marches to the North River.... Updates from Count de Grasse.... Strategy against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval battle.... The combined armies move towards the Chesapeake.... Yorktown is besieged.... Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


ILLUSTRATIONS

George Washington, by Gilbert Stuart

Martha Washington, by Gilbert Stuart

George Washington, by John Trumbull

The Ruins of Stony Point—On the Hudson

Beverly Robinson Mansion at West Point

Where Washington Stayed During André's Trial

The Moore House at Yorktown, Virginia










LIFE OF WASHINGTON, Volume IV.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Greene invests Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Progress of Marion and Lee.... Lord Rawdon retires into the lower country.... Greene invests Ninety Six.... Is repulsed.... Retires from that place.... Active movements of the two armies.... After a short repose they resume active operations.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army retires towards Charleston.

Greene surrounds Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Progress of Marion and Lee.... Lord Rawdon withdraws to the lower country.... Greene surrounds Ninety Six.... Is pushed back.... Withdraws from that location.... Active movements of the two armies.... After a brief rest, they begin active operations again.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army retreats toward Charleston.

CHAPTER II.

Preparations for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain. Conciliatory conduct of General Carleton.... Transactions in the south.... Negotiations for peace.... Preliminary and eventual articles agreed upon between the United States and Great Britain.... Discontents of the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny of a part of the Pennsylvania line.... Evacuation of New York.... General Washington resigns his commission and retires to Mount Vernon.

Preparations for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain. General Carleton's conciliatory approach.... Events in the south.... Peace negotiations.... Preliminary and final agreements reached between the United States and Great Britain.... Unrest in the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny among some of the Pennsylvania line.... Evacuation of New York.... General Washington resigns his commission and returns to Mount Vernon.

CHAPTER III.

General Washington devotes his time to rural pursuits.... to the duties of friendship.... and to institutions of public utility.... Resolves of Congress and of the Legislature of Virginia for erecting statues to his honour.... Recommends improvement in inland navigation.... Declines accepting a donation made to him by his native state.... The society of the Cincinnati.... He is elected President.... The causes which led to a change of the government of the United States.... Circular letter of General Washington to the governors of the several states.

General Washington spends his time on farming... maintaining friendships... and supporting public service organizations... Resolutions from Congress and the Virginia Legislature for building statues in his honor... He suggests enhancements for inland waterways... He turns down a donation from his home state... The Society of the Cincinnati... He is elected President... The reasons that led to a shift in the government of the United States... General Washington's circular letter to the governors of the various states.

CHAPTER IV.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams appointed minister to Great Britain.... Discontents excited by the commercial regulations of Britain.... Parties in the United States.... The convention at Annapolis.... Virginia appoints deputies to a convention at Philadelphia.... General Washington chosen one of them.... Insurrection at Massachusetts.... Convention at Philadelphia.... A form of government submitted to the respective states, as ratified by eleven of them.... Correspondence of General Washington respecting the chief magistracy.... He is elected president.... Meeting of the first congress.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams appointed as minister to Great Britain.... Discontent sparked by Britain's commercial regulations.... Political parties in the United States.... The convention in Annapolis.... Virginia appoints delegates to a convention in Philadelphia.... General Washington is chosen as one of them.... Rebellion in Massachusetts.... Convention in Philadelphia.... A proposed government is submitted to the individual states, as approved by eleven of them.... Correspondence of General Washington about the presidency.... He is elected president.... The first Congress meets.

CHAPTER V.

The election of General Washington officially announced to him.... His departure for the seat of government.... Marks of affection shown him on his journey.... His inauguration and speech to Congress.... His system of intercourse with the world.... Letters on this and other subjects.... Answers of both houses of Congress to the speech.... Domestic and foreign relations of the United States.... Debates on the impost and tonnage bills.... On the power of removal from office.... On the policy of the secretary of the treasury reporting plans of revenue.... On the style of the President.... Amendments to the constitution.... Appointment of executive officers, and of the judges.... Adjournment of the first session of congress.... The President visits New England.... His reception.... North Carolina accedes to the union.

The election of General Washington officially informed him.... His departure for the capital.... Signs of affection shown to him during his journey.... His inauguration and speech to Congress.... His approach to international relations.... Letters on this and other topics.... Responses from both houses of Congress to his speech.... Domestic and foreign relations of the United States.... Debates on the import and tonnage bills.... On the power to remove officials from office.... On the policy of the Secretary of the Treasury presenting revenue plans.... On the President’s style.... Amendments to the Constitution.... Appointment of executive officers and judges.... Adjournment of the first session of Congress.... The President visits New England.... His reception.... North Carolina joins the union.

CHAPTER VI.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Report of the secretary of the treasury on public credit.... Debate thereon.... Bill for fixing the permanent seat of government.... Adjournment of congress.... Treaty with the Creek Indians.... Relations of the United States with Great Britain and Spain.... The President visits Mount Vernon.... Session of congress.... The President's speech.... Debates on the excise.... On a national bank.... The opinions of the cabinet on the law.... Progress of parties.... War with the Indians.... Defeat of Harmar.... Adjournment of congress.

Meeting of Congress… President's speech… Report from the Secretary of the Treasury on public credit… Debate about it… Bill to establish the permanent seat of government… Adjournment of Congress… Treaty with the Creek Indians… Relations between the United States, Great Britain, and Spain… The President visits Mount Vernon… Congress session… The President's speech… Debates on the excise tax… On a national bank… The cabinet's views on the law… Progress of political parties… War with the Indians… Defeat of Harmar… Adjournment of Congress.

CHAPTER VII.

General St. Clair appointed Commander-in-chief.... The President makes a tour through the southern states.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Debate on the bill for apportioning representatives.... Military law.... Defeat of St. Clair.... Opposition to the increase of the army.... Report of the Secretary of the Treasury for raising additional supplies.... Congress adjourns.... Strictures on the conduct of administration, with a view of parties.... Disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury.... Letters from General Washington.... Opposition to the excise law.... President's proclamation.... Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo.... General Wayne appointed to the command of the army.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Resolutions implicating the Secretary of the Treasury, rejected.... Congress adjourns.... Progress of the French revolution, and its effects on parties in the United States.

General St. Clair was appointed Commander-in-Chief. The President toured the southern states. There was a meeting of Congress. The President gave a speech. There was a debate on the bill to apportion representatives. Military law was discussed. St. Clair faced defeat. There was opposition to increasing the army. The Secretary of the Treasury reported on raising additional supplies. Congress adjourned. Criticism arose regarding the administration's conduct and party views. There was disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury. Letters were sent from General Washington. There was opposition to the excise law. The President issued a proclamation. Insurrection and massacre occurred in the island of St. Domingo. General Wayne was appointed to lead the army. Congress met again. The President gave another speech. Resolutions implicating the Secretary of the Treasury were rejected. Congress adjourned. The progress of the French Revolution and its effects on political parties in the United States were noted.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

George Washington

Livingston Manor, Dobbs Ferry, New York

The Long Room in Fraunces' Tavern, New York City

The Old Senate Chamber at Annapolis, Maryland, Where Washington Resigned His Commission

The Room in Which the First Constitutional Convention Met in Philadelphia

Washington Taking the Oath of Office

View of the Old City or Federal Hall, New York, in 1789

Tomb of Mary, Mother of Washington










LIFE OF WASHINGTON, Volume V.

CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

G. Washington again unanimously elected President.... War between Great Britain and France.... Queries of the President respecting the conduct to be adopted by the American government.... Proclamation of neutrality.... Arrival of Mr. Genet as minister from France.... His conduct.... Illegal proceedings of the French cruisers.... Opinions of the cabinet.... State of parties.... Democratic societies.... Genet calculates upon the partialities of the American people for France, and openly insults their government.... Rules laid down by the executive to be observed in the ports of the United States in relation to the powers at war.... The President requests the recall of Genet.... British order of 8th of June, 1793.... Decree of the national convention relative to neutral commerce.

G. Washington was once again elected President unanimously... War broke out between Great Britain and France... The President has questions about how the American government should respond... Proclamation of neutrality... Arrival of Mr. Genet as minister from France... His behavior... Illegal actions by the French cruisers... Opinions from the cabinet... State of political parties... Democratic societies... Genet relies on the American people's sympathy for France and openly disrespects their government... Guidelines set by the executive for what should be followed in U.S. ports regarding the warring powers... The President asks for Genet's removal... British order from June 8, 1793... Decree from the national convention about neutral trade.

CHAPTER II.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... His message on the foreign relations of the United States.... Report of the Secretary of State on the commerce of the United States.... He resigns.... Is succeeded by Mr. Randolph.... Mr. Madison's resolutions founded on the above report.... Debate thereon.... Debates on the subject of a navy.... An embargo law.... Mission of Mr. Jay to Great Britain.... Inquiry into the conduct of the Secretary of the Treasury, terminates honourably to him.... Internal taxes.... Congress adjourns.

Meeting of Congress... President's speech... His message on the foreign relations of the United States... Report from the Secretary of State on U.S. commerce... He resigns... Mr. Randolph takes over... Mr. Madison's resolutions based on the report above... Debate on this... Discussions about a navy... An embargo law... Mr. Jay's mission to Great Britain... Investigation into the Secretary of the Treasury's conduct ends positively for him... Internal taxes... Congress adjourns.

CHAPTER III.

Genet recalled.... Is succeeded by Mr. Fauchet.... Gouverneur Morris recalled, and is succeeded by Mr. Monroe.... Kentucky remonstrance.... Intemperate resolutions of the people of that state.... General Wayne defeats the Indians on the Miamis.... Insurrection in the western parts of Pennsylvania.... Quelled by the prompt and vigorous measures of the government.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Democratic societies.... Resignation of Colonel Hamilton.... Is succeeded by Mr. Wolcott.... Resignation of General Knox.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.... Conditionally ratified by the President.... The treaty unpopular.... Mr. Randolph resigns.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Colonel M'Henry appointed secretary at war.... Charge against the President rejected..... Treaty with the Indians north-west of the Ohio.... With Algiers.... With Spain.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet..... The house of representatives call upon the President for papers relating to the treaty with Great Britain.... He declines sending them.... Debates upon the treaty making power.... Upon the bill for making appropriations to carry into execution the treaty with Great Britain.... Congress adjourns.... The President endeavours to procure the liberation of Lafayette.

Genet recalls... Mr. Fauchet takes over... Gouverneur Morris is recalled and replaced by Mr. Monroe... Kentucky expresses its grievances... Heated resolutions from the people of that state... General Wayne defeats the Indians in the Miamis... An uprising occurs in the western parts of Pennsylvania... It is suppressed by the swift and strong actions of the government... Congress meets... The President gives a speech... Democratic societies emerge... Colonel Hamilton resigns... Mr. Wolcott takes over... General Knox resigns... Colonel Pickering steps in... A treaty between the United States and Great Britain is conditionally ratified by the President... The treaty is unpopular... Mr. Randolph resigns... Colonel Pickering takes over again... Colonel M'Henry is appointed Secretary at War... Allegations against the President are dismissed... A treaty with the Indians northwest of the Ohio... Treaties with Algiers and Spain... Congress meets... The President delivers a speech... Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet... The House of Representatives asks the President for documents related to the treaty with Great Britain... He refuses to send them... Debates arise over treaty-making powers... And over the bill for funding the implementation of the treaty with Great Britain... Congress adjourns... The President tries to secure Lafayette's release.

CHAPTER IV.

Letters from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile measures of France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe recalled and General Pinckney appointed to succeed him.... General Washington's valedictory address to the people of the United States.... The Minister of France endeavours to influence the approaching election.... The President's speech to congress.... He denies the authenticity of certain spurious letters published in 1776.... John Adams elected President, and Thomas Jefferson Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... Political situation of the United States at this period.... The French government refuses to receive General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... President's speech.... Three envoys extraordinary deputed to France.... Their treatment.... Measures of hostility adopted by the American government against France.... General Washington appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And character.

Letters from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile actions by France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe is recalled and General Pinckney is appointed to take his place.... General Washington's farewell address to the people of the United States.... The Minister of France tries to influence the upcoming election.... The President's speech to Congress.... He denies the authenticity of certain fake letters published in 1776.... John Adams is elected President, and Thomas Jefferson is Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... The political situation of the United States at this time.... The French government refuses to accept General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... The President's speech.... Three extraordinary envoys are sent to France.... Their treatment.... Hostile measures taken by the American government against France.... General Washington is appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And his character.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

President Washington

Martha Washington

George Washington

George Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

 George Washington

Martha Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

Mount Vernon

 Resting-Place of George and Martha Washington at Mount Vernon














Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

book spines

book spines

 

General Washington

General Washington

General Washington

President Washington

From the full length portrait by John Trumbull at Yale University

From the full-length portrait by John Trumbull at Yale University

This portrait is one of 54 canvasses the artist presented to Yale University in return for an annuity of $1,000. Washington was in his forty-third year and it is considered the best likeness of him at the outbreak of the Revolution. The canvas depicts him, "six feet two inches in height, with brown hair, blue eyes, large head and hands, and strong arms."

This painting is one of 54 canvases the artist donated to Yale University in exchange for an annual payment of $1,000. Washington was 43 years old, and this is thought to be the most accurate representation of him at the start of the Revolution. The painting shows him as "six feet two inches tall, with brown hair, blue eyes, a large head and hands, and strong arms."


THE

LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON,

COMMANDER IN CHIEF

OF THE

AMERICAN FORCES,

DURING THE WAR WHICH ESTABLISHED THE INDEPENDENCE OF HIS COUNTRY,

AND

FIRST PRESIDENT

OF THE

UNITED STATES.

COMPILED UNDER THE INSPECTION OF

THE HONOURABLE BUSHROD WASHINGTON,

FROM

ORIGINAL PAPERS

BEQUEATHED TO HIM BY HIS DECEASED RELATIVE, AND NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR.

TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,

AN INTRODUCTION,

CONTAINING A COMPENDIOUS VIEW OF THE COLONIES PLANTED BY THE ENGLISH ON THE

CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA,

FROM THEIR SETTLEMENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THAT WAR WHICH TERMINATED IN THEIR

INDEPENDENCE.

BY JOHN MARSHALL.

VOL. I.


THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

 

title page

title page

 

subscription

subscription


PUBLISHER'S PREFACE

In his will George Washington bequeathed to his favorite nephew, Bushrod Washington, his personal letters, private papers and secret documents accumulated during a lifetime of service to his country. When the bequest became known, many of the literary men of the country were proposed for the commission to write the authorized life of our First President.

In his will, George Washington left his favorite nephew, Bushrod Washington, his personal letters, private papers, and confidential documents that he had gathered throughout his lifetime of service to his country. When this became public, many of the country's writers were suggested for the task of writing the official biography of our First President.

Bushrod Washington's choice fell upon John Marshall, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. To him he handed over all the precious papers left him by his distinguished relative. George Washington and Marshall's father, Thomas Marshall, were boyhood companions, so John Marshall knew "the Father of His Country" as a neighbor and friend from his earliest youth, and served under him in the Revolution.

Bushrod Washington chose John Marshall, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He gave him all the valuable papers left to him by his esteemed relative. George Washington and Marshall's father, Thomas Marshall, were childhood friends, so John Marshall knew "the Father of His Country" as a neighbor and friend from a young age and served under him during the Revolution.

If it be true that it takes a great man to interpret the life of a great man then Bushrod Washington made no mistake in the selection of a biographer. For Marshall, under the influence of Washington, came to be nearly as great a man as the character whose life and achievements held his deepest thought for nearly a quarter of a century. Certainly his services to his country rank close to Washington's. Marshall's sympathetic understanding of his subject, his first-hand knowledge of events with his remarkable powers of expression qualified him to produce the masterpiece that has come down to us.

If it’s true that it takes a great person to accurately portray the life of another great person, then Bushrod Washington made a wise choice in his selection of a biographer. Under Washington's influence, Marshall became almost as great as the individual whose life and accomplishments occupied his thoughts for nearly twenty-five years. Clearly, his contributions to the country are on par with Washington's. Marshall's deep understanding of his subject, his direct experience with events, and his exceptional ability to express himself made him qualified to create the masterpiece that we have today.

Seven years were spent in preparing the first edition, published in 1804-07. The work was based chiefly on Washington's own diaries and letters and secret archives and it told not simply the epic story of this great life but the truth about the birth of our nation. Marshall later spent fifteen years revising the first edition, verifying to the last detail every chapter, page and paragraph of his monumental work.

Seven years were spent preparing the first edition, published between 1804 and 1807. The work was mainly based on Washington's own diaries, letters, and secret archives, and it chronicled not just the epic story of this great life but also the truth about the birth of our nation. Marshall later dedicated fifteen years to revising the first edition, double-checking every detail of each chapter, page, and paragraph of his monumental work.

The first edition, published by C.P. Wayne of Philadelphia, was an achievement in beautiful printing and bookmaking and still stands out today as such. The present publishers have followed the format of the original edition but have used the revised text which Marshall spent so many years in perfecting.

The first edition, published by C.P. Wayne of Philadelphia, was a remarkable example of beautiful printing and bookmaking and still stands out today. The current publishers have maintained the format of the original edition but have used the updated text that Marshall dedicated so many years to perfecting.

Washington's personality lives on in John Marshall's great biography. He still has the power to raise up men to greatness as he did during his lifetime. The precepts, the principles and the shining example of this foremost of self-educated, self-made Americans have the power to uplift and start toward new heights of achievement, all who come in contact with him. The work is now reissued in the hope that it may give his countrymen of the present day the benefit of the counsel, the guidance and the inspiration that has proven so valuable in the past.

Washington's personality endures in John Marshall's amazing biography. He still has the ability to elevate people to greatness just as he did during his life. The teachings, principles, and shining example of this leading self-educated, self-made American can uplift and inspire everyone who encounters him, encouraging them to reach new heights of achievement. This work is now being reissued in the hope that it will provide today's citizens with the counsel, guidance, and inspiration that has been so valuable in the past.

February 22nd, 1926.

February 22, 1926.


PREFACE

BY THE AUTHOR

A desire to know intimately those illustrious personages, who have performed a conspicuous part on the great theatre of the world, is, perhaps, implanted in every human bosom. We delight to follow them through the various critical and perilous situations in which they have been placed, to view them in the extremes of adverse and prosperous fortune, to trace their progress through all the difficulties they have surmounted, and to contemplate their whole conduct, at a time when, the power and the pomp of office having disappeared, it may be presented to us in the simple garb of truth.

A wish to intimately know those remarkable figures who have played a significant role on the grand stage of the world is, perhaps, ingrained in every human heart. We enjoy following them through the various critical and risky situations they have faced, seeing them at both their lowest and highest points, tracking their journeys through all the challenges they have overcome, and reflecting on their entire actions at a time when, after the power and glory of their positions have faded, it can be revealed to us in the plain light of truth.

If among those exalted characters which are produced in every age, none can have a fairer claim to the attention and recollection of mankind than those under whose auspices great empires have been founded, or political institutions deserving to be permanent, established; a faithful representation of the various important events connected with the life of the favourite son of America, cannot be unworthy of the general regard. Among his own countrymen it will unquestionably excite the deepest interest.

If among those remarkable figures that emerge in every era, none deserve more of humanity's attention and memory than those who have founded great empires or established enduring political institutions, then an accurate account of the significant events related to the beloved son of America is certainly worthy of public interest. It will undoubtedly capture the deepest interest of his fellow countrymen.

As if the chosen instrument of Heaven, selected for the purpose of effecting the great designs of Providence respecting this our western hemisphere, it was the peculiar lot of this distinguished man, at every epoch when the destinies of his country seemed dependent on the measures adopted, to be called by the united voice of his fellow citizens to those high stations on which the success of those measures principally depended. It was his peculiar lot to be equally useful in obtaining the independence, and consolidating the civil institutions, of his country. We perceive him at the head of her armies, during a most arduous and perilous war on the events of which her national existence was staked, supporting with invincible fortitude the unequal conflict. That war being happily terminated, and the political revolutions of America requiring that he should once more relinquish his beloved retirement, we find him guiding her councils with the same firmness, wisdom, and virtue, which had, long and successfully, been displayed in the field. We behold him her chief magistrate at a time when her happiness, her liberty, perhaps her preservation depended on so administering the affairs of the Union, that a government standing entirely on the public favour, which had with infinite difficulty been adopted, and against which the most inveterate prejudices had been excited, should conciliate public opinion, and acquire a firmness and stability that would enable it to resist the rude shocks it was destined to sustain. It was too his peculiar fortune to afford the brightest examples of moderation and patriotism, by voluntarily divesting himself of the highest military and civil honours when the public interests no longer demanded that he should retain them. We find him retiring from the head of a victorious and discontented army which adored him, so soon as the object for which arms had been taken up was accomplished; and withdrawing from the highest office an American citizen can hold, as soon as his influence, his character, and his talents ceased to be necessary to the maintenance of that government which had been established under his auspices.

As if he were the chosen instrument of Heaven, selected to carry out the great plans of Providence for our western hemisphere, this remarkable man faced unique circumstances at every pivotal moment when his country’s future seemed tied to the actions taken. At those critical times, the united voice of his fellow citizens called him to high positions that were crucial for the success of those actions. He played a key role in achieving independence and strengthening his country’s civil institutions. We see him leading her armies during a tough and dangerous war that determined her national survival, showing unwavering courage in an unequal struggle. Once that war ended successfully, and with America undergoing political changes requiring him to step away from his cherished retirement, he took charge of her governance with the same strength, wisdom, and integrity he had long and effectively demonstrated on the battlefield. We witness him as the chief leader at a time when the nation’s happiness, freedom, and perhaps survival depended on managing the Union’s affairs in such a way that a government relying solely on public support—one that had been adopted with great difficulty and faced deep-seated prejudice—could win public favor and gain the strength and stability needed to withstand the challenges ahead. It was also his special fortune to set shining examples of moderation and patriotism by willingly stepping down from the highest military and civil honors once the public interest no longer required it. We see him walk away from the command of a victorious yet restless army that idolized him as soon as the objectives of the conflict were achieved, and he stepped down from the top position any American can hold as soon as his influence, character, and skills were no longer essential for sustaining the government established under his guidance.

He was indeed, "first in war,[1] first in peace, and first in the hearts of his fellow citizens."

He was truly "first in war,[1] first in peace, and first in the hearts of his fellow citizens."

A faithful detail of the transactions of a person so pre-eminently distinguished will be looked for with avidity, and the author laments his inability to present to the public a work which may gratify the expectations that have been raised. In addition to that just diffidence of himself which he very sincerely feels, two causes beyond his control combine to excite this apprehension.

A detailed account of the dealings of such a highly distinguished individual will be eagerly anticipated, and the author regrets his inability to deliver a work that can meet the raised expectations. Along with his genuine sense of humility, two factors beyond his control contribute to his concerns.

Accustomed to look in the page of history for incidents in themselves of great magnitude, to find immense exertions attended with inconsiderable effects, and vast means employed in producing unimportant ends, we are in the habit of bestowing on the recital of military actions, a degree of consideration proportioned to the numbers engaged in them. When the struggle has terminated, and the agitations felt during its suspense have subsided, it is difficult to attach to enterprises, in which small numbers have been concerned, that admiration which is often merited by the talents displayed in their execution, or that interest which belongs to the consequences that have arisen from them.

Used to looking in the pages of history for events that are significant in themselves, we often see huge efforts resulting in little impact and extensive resources put to use for trivial outcomes. We tend to give military actions a level of importance based on the number of people involved. When the conflict is over and the intense feelings during the uncertainty have faded, it’s hard to have the same admiration for endeavors involving small groups that is often deserved for the skills shown in their execution, or the interest that comes from the results they produced.

The long and distressing contest between Great Britain and these states did not abound in those great battles which are so frequent in the wars of Europe. Those who expect a continued succession of victories and defeats; who can only feel engaged in the movements of vast armies, and who believe that a Hero must be perpetually in action, will be disappointed in almost every page of the following history. Seldom was the American chief in a condition to indulge his native courage in those brilliant achievements to which he was stimulated by his own feelings, and a detail of which interests, enraptures, and astonishes the reader. Had he not often checked his natural disposition, had he not tempered his ardour with caution, the war he conducted would probably have been of short duration, and the United States would still have been colonies. At the head of troops most of whom were perpetually raw because they were perpetually changing; who were neither well fed, paid, clothed, nor armed; and who were generally inferior, even in numbers, to the enemy; he derives no small title to glory from the consideration, that he never despaired of the public safety; that he was able at all times to preserve the appearance of an army, and that, in the most desperate situation of American affairs, he did not, for an instant, cease to be formidable. To estimate rightly his worth we must contemplate his difficulties. We must examine the means placed in his hands, and the use he made of those means. To preserve an army when conquest was impossible, to avoid defeat and ruin when victory was unattainable, to keep his forces embodied and suppress the discontents of his soldiers, exasperated by a long course of the most cruel privations, to seize with unerring discrimination the critical moment when vigorous offensive operations might be advantageously carried on, are actions not less valuable in themselves, nor do they require less capacity in the chief who performs them, than a continued succession of battles. But they spread less splendour over the page which recounts them, and excite weaker emotions in the bosom of the reader.

The long and difficult struggle between Great Britain and these states didn’t have the major battles that are so common in European wars. Those who expect a constant flow of victories and defeats, who only get invested in the movements of large armies, and who think a hero must always be in action will be let down on almost every page of this history. The American leader seldom had the chance to act on his natural courage in the impressive feats that would engage, thrill, and amaze the reader. If he hadn’t often held back his instincts, if he hadn’t balanced his enthusiasm with caution, the war he led would likely have ended quickly, and the United States would still be colonies. Leading troops most of whom were always inexperienced because they were constantly changing, who were poorly fed, paid, clothed, and armed, and who were generally outnumbered by the enemy, he earns significant respect because he never lost hope for the public’s safety; he was able to maintain the appearance of an army at all times, and in the most desperate moments for America, he never ceased to be a threat. To properly assess his worth, we need to consider his challenges. We must look at the resources he had and how he utilized them. Preserving an army when winning was impossible, avoiding defeat and disaster when victory was out of reach, keeping his forces united and managing the dissatisfaction of his soldiers, who were worn down after a long period of severe hardships, and recognizing the exact moment when strong offensive actions could be effectively launched are actions that are just as significant on their own and require just as much skill from the leader performing them as a series of battles. However, they don’t create the same glory in the narrative recounting them and stir weaker emotions in the reader’s heart.

There is also another source from which some degree of disappointment has been anticipated. It is the impossibility of giving to the public in the first part of this work many facts not already in their possession.

There is also another source of disappointment that has been expected. It’s the inability to provide the public in the first part of this work with many facts they don’t already know.

The American war was a subject of too much importance to have remained thus long unnoticed by the literary world. Almost every event worthy of attention, which occurred during its progress, has been gleaned up and detailed. Not only the public, but much of the private correspondence of the commander in chief has been inspected, and permission given to extract from it whatever might properly be communicated. In the military part of this history, therefore, the author can promise not much that is new. He can only engage for the correctness with which facts are stated, and for the diligence with which his researches have been made.

The American war was too important to have stayed unnoticed by the literary world for so long. Almost every significant event that happened during it has been collected and discussed. Not only has the public correspondence been examined, but a lot of the private correspondence of the commander in chief has also been reviewed, with permission granted to share anything that can be appropriately communicated. Therefore, in this military history, the author doesn’t have much that’s new to offer. He can only vouch for the accuracy of the facts presented and the thoroughness of his research.

The letters to and from the commander in chief during the war, were very numerous and have been carefully preserved. The whole of this immensely voluminous correspondence has, with infinite labour, been examined; and the work now offered to the public is, principally, compiled from it. The facts which occurred on the continent are, generally, supported by these letters, and it has therefore been deemed unnecessary to multiply references to them. But there are many facts so connected with those events, in which the general performed a principal part, that they ought not to be omitted, and respecting which his correspondence cannot be expected to furnish satisfactory information.

The letters exchanged with the commander in chief during the war were very numerous and have been carefully preserved. This extensive correspondence has been thoroughly examined with great effort, and the work now presented to the public is primarily compiled from it. The facts that took place on the continent are generally supported by these letters, so it has been considered unnecessary to include numerous references. However, there are many events closely related to those occurrences where the general played a key role, and these should not be overlooked, as his correspondence is unlikely to provide satisfactory information about them.

Such facts have been taken from the histories of the day, and the authority relied on for the establishment of their verity has been cited. Doddesly's Annual Register, Belsham, Gordon, Ramsay, and Stedman have, for this purpose, been occasionally resorted to, and are quoted for all those facts which are detailed in part on their authority. Their very language has sometimes been employed without distinguishing the passages, especially when intermingled with others, by marks of quotation, and the author persuades himself that this public declaration will rescue him from the imputation of receiving aids he is unwilling to acknowledge, or of wishing, by a concealed plagiarism, to usher to the world, as his own, the labours of others.

Such facts have been taken from the histories of the time, and the sources used to verify their truth have been cited. Doddsley's Annual Register, Belsham, Gordon, Ramsay, and Stedman have been referred to for this purpose and are quoted for all the facts detailed in part based on their authority. Their exact wording has sometimes been used without distinguishing the passages, particularly when mixed with others, by using quotation marks, and the author believes that this public declaration will protect him from the accusation of taking credit for help he’s not willing to acknowledge, or of trying to present the work of others as his own through hidden plagiarism.

In selecting the materials for the succeeding volumes, it was deemed proper to present to the public as much as possible of general Washington himself. Prominent as he must be in any history of the American war, there appeared to be a peculiar fitness in rendering him still more so in one which professes to give a particular account of his own life. His private opinions therefore; his various plans, even those which were never carried into execution; his individual exertions to prevent and correct the multiplied errors committed by inexperience, are given in more minute detail; and more copious extracts from his letters are taken, than would comport with the plan of a more general work.

In choosing the materials for the next volumes, it seemed right to share as much as possible about General Washington himself. Since he plays a major role in any history of the American war, it felt particularly fitting to highlight him even more in a work that aims to provide a detailed account of his life. Therefore, his private opinions, his various plans—even those that were never put into action—his personal efforts to prevent and correct the many mistakes made due to inexperience, are presented in greater detail; and more extensive excerpts from his letters are included than would typically be found in a more general work.

Many events too are unnoticed, which in such a composition would be worthy of being introduced, and much useful information has not been sought for, which a professed history of America ought to comprise. Yet the history of general Washington, during his military command and civil administration, is so much that of his country, that the work appeared to the author to be most sensibly incomplete and unsatisfactory, while unaccompanied by such a narrative of the principal events preceding our revolutionary war, as would make the reader acquainted with the genius, character, and resources of the people about to engage in that memorable contest. This appeared the more necessary as that period of our history is but little known to ourselves. Several writers have detailed very minutely the affairs of a particular colony, but the desideratum is a composition which shall present in one connected view, the transactions of all those colonies which now form the United States.

Many events also go unnoticed that should be included in a composition like this, and a lot of useful information hasn't been sought that a comprehensive history of America should cover. However, the history of General Washington during his military leadership and time in office is so closely linked to that of his country that the author felt the work was incomplete and insufficient without a narrative of the key events leading up to our revolutionary war to familiarize the reader with the spirit, character, and resources of the people about to engage in that significant conflict. This seemed even more important since that period of our history is not well known to us. Several writers have gone into great detail on the events of a specific colony, but what we really need is a work that presents a unified view of the events of all the colonies that now make up the United States.


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Commission of Cabot.... His voyage to America.... Views of discovery relinquished by Henry VII.... Resumed by Elizabeth.... Letters patent to Sir Humphry Gilbert.... His voyages and death.... Patent to Sir Walter Raleigh.... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.... Colonists carried back to England by Drake.... Grenville arrives with other colonists.... They are left on Roanoke Island.... Are destroyed by the Indians.... Arrival of John White.... He returns to England for succour.... Raleigh assigns his patent.... Patent to Sir Thomas Gates and others.... Code of laws for the proposed colony drawn up by the King.

Commission of Cabot... His journey to America... Discovery efforts given up by Henry VII... Taken up again by Elizabeth... Letters patent granted to Sir Humphry Gilbert... His journeys and death... Patent granted to Sir Walter Raleigh... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville... Colonists brought back to England by Drake... Grenville arrives with more colonists... They are left on Roanoke Island... Are killed by the Indians... Arrival of John White... He goes back to England for help... Raleigh assigns his patent... Patent granted to Sir Thomas Gates and others... Set of laws for the planned colony created by the King.

CHAPTER II.

Voyage of Newport.... Settlement at Jamestown.... Distress of colonists.... Smith.... He is captured by the Indians.... Condemned to death, saved by Pocahontas.... Returns to Jamestown.... Newport arrives with fresh settlers.... Smith explores the Chesapeake.... Is chosen president.... New charter.... Third voyage of Newport.... Smith sails for Europe.... Condition of the colony.... Colonists determine to abandon the country.... Are stopped by Lord Delaware.... Sir Thomas Dale.... New charter.... Capt. Argal seizes Pocahontas.... She marries Mr. Rolf.... Separate property in lands and labour.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Manhadoes.... Fifty acres of land for each settler.... Tobacco.... Sir Thomas Dale.... Mr. Yeardley.... First assembly.... First arrival of females.... Of convicts.... Of African slaves.... Two councils established.... Prosperity of the colony.... Indians attempt to massacre the whites.... General war.... Dissolution of the company.... Arbitrary measures of the crown.... Sir John Harvey.... Sir William Berkeley.... Provincial assembly restored.... Virginia declares in favour of Charles II.... Grant to Lord Baltimore.... Arrival of a colony in Maryland.... Assembly composed of freemen.... William Claybourne.... Assembly composed of representatives.... Divided into two branches.... Tyrannical proceedings.

Voyage of Newport.... Settlement at Jamestown.... Struggles of colonists.... Smith.... He is captured by the Indians.... Sentenced to death, saved by Pocahontas.... Returns to Jamestown.... Newport arrives with new settlers.... Smith explores the Chesapeake.... Is elected president.... New charter.... Third voyage of Newport.... Smith sails for Europe.... State of the colony.... Colonists decide to leave the country.... Are stopped by Lord Delaware.... Sir Thomas Dale.... New charter.... Capt. Argal captures Pocahontas.... She marries Mr. Rolf.... Separate property in land and labor.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Manhadoes.... Fifty acres of land for each settler.... Tobacco.... Sir Thomas Dale.... Mr. Yeardley.... First assembly.... First arrival of women.... Of convicts.... Of African slaves.... Two councils established.... Growth of the colony.... Indians try to massacre the settlers.... General war.... Dissolution of the company.... Arbitrary actions of the crown.... Sir John Harvey.... Sir William Berkeley.... Provincial assembly restored.... Virginia declares support for Charles II.... Grant to Lord Baltimore.... Arrival of a colony in Maryland.... Assembly made up of free men.... William Claybourne.... Assembly made up of representatives.... Divided into two branches.... Oppressive actions.

CHAPTER III.

First ineffectual attempts of the Plymouth company to settle the country.... Settlement at New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and company.... New charter.... Settlements prosecuted vigorously.... Government transferred to the colonists.... Boston founded.... Religious intolerance.... General court established.... Royal commission for the government of the plantations.... Contest with the French colony of Acadié.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchison.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the patent of the colony.... Religious dissensions.... Providence settled.... Rhode Island settled.... Connecticut settled.... War with the Pequods.... New Haven settled.

First unsuccessful attempts by the Plymouth company to establish a presence in the region.... Settlement at New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and company.... New charter.... Settlements pursued energetically.... Government handed over to the colonists.... Boston founded.... Religious intolerance.... General court established.... Royal commission for the governance of the plantations.... Conflict with the French colony of Acadié.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchinson.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the colony's patent.... Religious conflicts.... Providence established.... Rhode Island established.... Connecticut established.... War with the Pequods.... New Haven established.

CHAPTER IV.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine.... Dissensions among the inhabitants.... Confederation of the New England colonies.... Rhode Island excluded from it.... Separate chambers provided for the two branches of the Legislature.... New England takes part with Parliament.... Treaty with Acadié.... Petition of the non-conformists.... Disputes between Massachusetts and Connecticut.... War between England and Holland.... Machinations of the Dutch at Manhadoes among the Indians.... Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war.... Application of New Haven to Cromwell for assistance.... Peace with the Dutch.... Expedition of Sedgewic against Acadié.... Religious intolerance.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine... Conflicts among the residents... Confederation of the New England colonies... Rhode Island is excluded from it... Separate chambers are designated for the two branches of the Legislature... New England aligns with Parliament... Treaty with Acadia... Petition from the non-conformists... Disputes between Massachusetts and Connecticut... War between England and the Netherlands... Schemes of the Dutch at Manhattan among the Indians... Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war... New Haven appeals to Cromwell for help... Peace with the Dutch... Sedgewick's expedition against Acadia... Religious intolerance.

CHAPTER V.

Transactions succeeding the restoration of Charles II.... Contests between Connecticut and New Haven.... Discontents in Virginia.... Grant to the Duke of York.... Commissioners appointed by the crown.... Conquest of the Dutch settlements.... Conduct of Massachusetts to the royal commissioners.... Their recall.... Massachusetts evades a summons to appear before the King and council.... Settlement of Carolina.... Form of government.... Constitution of Mr. Locke.... Discontents in the county of Albemarle.... Invasion from Florida.... Abolition of the constitution of Mr. Locke.... Bacon's rebellion.... His death.... Assembly deprived of judicial power.... Discontents in Virginia.... Population of the colony.

Transactions following the restoration of Charles II... Conflicts between Connecticut and New Haven... Unrest in Virginia... Grant to the Duke of York... Commissioners appointed by the crown... Conquest of the Dutch settlements... Massachusetts' response to the royal commissioners... Their recall... Massachusetts avoiding a summons to appear before the King and council... Settlement of Carolina... Form of government... Constitution drafted by Mr. Locke... Discontent in the county of Albemarle... Invasion from Florida... Abolishment of Mr. Locke's constitution... Bacon's rebellion... His death... Assembly stripped of judicial power... Unrest in Virginia... Population of the colony.

CHAPTER VI.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine adjudged to Gorges.... Purchased by Massachusetts.... Royal government erected in New Hampshire.... Complaints against Massachusetts.... Their letters patent cancelled.... Death of Charles II.... James II. proclaimed.... New commission for the government of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island abrogated.... Odious measures of the new government.... Andros deposed.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of proceedings in New York and the Jerseys.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Frame of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia laid.... Assembly convened.... First acts of the legislature.... Boundary line with Lord Baltimore settled.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine assigned to Gorges.... Purchased by Massachusetts.... Royal government established in New Hampshire.... Complaints against Massachusetts.... Their letters patent canceled.... Death of Charles II.... James II. proclaimed.... New commission for the government of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island revoked.... Unpopular measures of the new government.... Andros removed from power.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of events in New York and the Jerseys.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Framework of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia laid.... Assembly convened.... First acts of the legislature.... Boundary line with Lord Baltimore settled.

CHAPTER VII.

New charter of Massachusetts.... Affairs of New York.... War with France.... Schenectady destroyed.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Quebec.... Acadié recovered by France.... Pemaquid taken.... Attempt on St. Johns.... Peace.... Affairs of New York.... Of Virginia.... Disputes between England and France respecting boundary in America.... Recommencement of hostilities.... Quotas of the respective colonies.... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Incursion into Massachusetts.... Plan for the invasion of Canada.... Port Royal taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Treaty of Utrecht.... Affairs of New York.... Of Carolina.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Attempt to establish the Episcopal church.... Invasion of the colony.... Bills of credit issued.... Legislature continues itself.... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians.... Tuscaroras defeated.... Scheme of a Bank.

New charter of Massachusetts... Affairs of New York... War with France... Schenectady destroyed... Expedition against Port Royal... Against Quebec... Acadié taken back by France... Pemaquid captured... Attempt on St. Johns... Peace... Affairs of New York... Of Virginia... Disputes between England and France over boundaries in America... Renewed hostilities... Quotas of the different colonies... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations... Expedition against Port Royal... Incursion into Massachusetts... Plan for the invasion of Canada... Port Royal captured... Expedition against Quebec... Treaty of Utrecht... Affairs of New York... Of Carolina... Expedition against St. Augustine... Attempt to establish the Episcopal church... Invasion of the colony... Bills of credit issued... Legislature extends itself... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians... Tuscaroras defeated... Proposal for a Bank.

CHAPTER VIII.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... Intrigues of the French among the Indians.... War with the savages.... Peace.... Controversy with the governor.... Decided in England.... Contests concerning the governor's salary.... The assembly adjourned to Salem.... Contest concerning the salary terminated.... Great depreciation of the paper currency.... Scheme of a land bank.... Company dissolved by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Review of transactions in New York.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... Intrigues of the French among the Native Americans.... War with the natives.... Peace.... Controversy with the governor.... Decided in England.... Disputes over the governor's salary.... The assembly adjourned to Salem.... Dispute over the salary resolved.... Significant depreciation of the paper currency.... Proposal for a land bank.... Company dissolved by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Review of events in New York.

CHAPTER IX.

War with the southern Indians.... Dissatisfaction of Carolina with the proprietors.... Rupture with Spain.... Combination to subvert the proprietary government.... Revolution completed.... Expedition from the Havanna against Charleston.... Peace with Spain.... The proprietors surrender their interest to the crown.... The province divided.... Georgia settled.... Impolicy of the first regulations.... Intrigues of the Spaniards with the slaves of South Carolina.... Insurrection of the slaves.

War with the southern Native Americans... Discontent in Carolina with the proprietors... Break with Spain... Alliance to overthrow the proprietary government... Revolution finished... Mission from Havana to Charleston... Peace with Spain... The proprietors give up their claim to the crown... The province split... Georgia established... Flaws in the initial regulations... Spanish plots with the slaves of South Carolina... Slave uprising.

CHAPTER X.

War declared against Spain.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Georgia invaded.... Spaniards land on an island in the Alatamaha.... Appearance of a fleet from Charleston.... Spanish army re-embarks.... Hostilities with France.... Expedition against Louisbourg.... Louisbourg surrenders.... Great plans of the belligerent powers.... Misfortunes of the armament under the duke D'Anville.... The French fleet dispersed by a storm.... Expedition against Nova Scotia.... Treaty of Aix la Chapelle.... Paper money of Massachusetts redeemed.... Contests between the French and English respecting boundaries.... Statement respecting the discovery of the Mississippi.... Scheme for connecting Louisiana with Canada.... Relative strength of the French and English colonies.... Defeat at the Little Meadows.... Convention at Albany.... Plan of union.... Objected to both in America and Great Britain.

War was declared against Spain... An expedition was launched against St. Augustine... Georgia was invaded... Spaniards landed on an island in the Altamaha... A fleet from Charleston appeared... The Spanish army re-embarked... Hostilities began with France... An expedition was sent against Louisbourg... Louisbourg surrendered... Ambitious plans from the warring powers... Misfortunes befell the armament led by Duke D'Anville... The French fleet was scattered by a storm... An expedition was organized against Nova Scotia... The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle... Massachusetts’ paper money was redeemed... Conflicts arose between the French and English over boundaries... A statement regarding the discovery of the Mississippi... A plan to connect Louisiana with Canada... The relative strength of French and English colonies... A defeat at the Little Meadows... A convention was held in Albany... A plan for union... It faced objections in both America and Great Britain.

CHAPTER XI.

General Braddock arrives.... Convention of governors and plan of the campaign.... French expelled from Nova Scotia, and inhabitants transplanted.... Expedition against fort Du Quêsne.... Battle of Monongahela.... Defeat and death of General Braddock.... Expedition against Crown Point.... Dieskau defeated.... Expedition against Niagara.... Frontiers distressed by the Indians.... Meeting of the governors at New York.... Plan for the campaign of 1756.... Lord Loudoun arrives.... Montcalm takes Oswego.... Lord Loudoun abandons offensive operations.... Small-pox breaks out in Albany.... Campaign of 1757 opened.... Admiral Holbourne arrives at Halifax.... Is joined by the earl of Loudoun.... Expedition against Louisbourg relinquished.... Lord Loudoun returns to New York.... Fort William Henry taken.... Controversy between Lord Loudoun and the assembly of Massachusetts.

General Braddock arrives... Convention of governors and plans for the campaign... French expelled from Nova Scotia, and residents relocated... Expedition against Fort Du Quêsne... Battle of Monongahela... Defeat and death of General Braddock... Expedition against Crown Point... Dieskau defeated... Expedition against Niagara... Frontiers troubled by the Indians... Meeting of the governors in New York... Plan for the 1756 campaign... Lord Loudoun arrives... Montcalm captures Oswego... Lord Loudoun cancels offensive operations... Smallpox breaks out in Albany... 1757 campaign begins... Admiral Holbourne arrives in Halifax... Joins forces with the Earl of Loudoun... Expedition against Louisbourg called off... Lord Loudoun returns to New York... Fort William Henry captured... Dispute between Lord Loudoun and the Massachusetts assembly.

CHAPTER XII.

Preparations for the campaign of 1758.... Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive at Halifax.... Plan of the campaign.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie repulsed under the walls of Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontignac taken.... Expedition against Fort Du Quêsne.... Preparations for the campaign of 1759.... General Amherst succeeds General Abercrombie.... Plan of the campaign.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point taken.... Army goes into winter quarters.... French repulsed at Oswego.... Defeated at Niagara.... Niagara taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Check to the English army.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Death of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec capitulates.... Garrisoned by the English under the command of General Murray.... Attempt to recover Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec besieged by Monsieur Levi.... Siege raised.... Montreal capitulates.... War with the southern Indians.... Battle near the town of Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... Success of the English.... Peace.

Preparations for the campaign of 1758.... Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive in Halifax.... Campaign plan.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie is pushed back outside Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontenac is captured.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Preparations for the campaign of 1759.... General Amherst takes over from General Abercrombie.... Campaign plan.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point are captured.... Army goes into winter quarters.... French forces are repelled at Oswego.... They are defeated at Niagara.... Niagara is captured.... Expedition against Quebec.... English army faces a setback.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Deaths of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec surrenders.... Garrisoned by the English under General Murray's command.... Attempt to reclaim Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec is besieged by Monsieur Lévis.... Siege is lifted.... Montreal surrenders.... Conflict with the southern Indians.... Battle near the town of Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... English success.... Peace.

CHAPTER XIII.

Opinions on the supremacy of parliament, and its right to tax the colonies.... The stamp act.... Congress at New York.... Violence in the towns.... Change of administration.... Stamp act repealed.... Opposition to the mutiny act.... Act imposing duties on tea, &c., resisted in America.... Letters from the assembly of Massachusetts to members of the administration.... Petition to the King.... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies.... Letter from the Earl of Hillsborough.... Assembly of Massachusetts dissolved.... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty.... Convention at Fanueil Hall.... Moderation of its proceedings.... Two British regiments arrive at Boston.... Resolutions of the house of Burgesses of Virginia.... Assembly dissolved.... The members form an association.... General measures against importation.... General court convened in Massachusetts.... Its proceedings.... Is prorogued.... Duties, except that on tea, repealed.... Circular letter of the earl of Hillsborough.... New York recedes from the non-importation agreement in part.... Her example followed.... Riot in Boston.... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

Opinions about the power of parliament and its right to tax the colonies... The Stamp Act... Congress in New York... Violence in the towns... Change in administration... The Stamp Act is repealed... Opposition to the Mutiny Act... The Act imposing duties on tea, etc., is resisted in America... Letters from the Massachusetts assembly to members of the administration... Petition to the King... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies... Letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... Massachusetts assembly is dissolved... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty... Convention at Faneuil Hall... Moderation in its proceedings... Two British regiments arrive in Boston... Resolutions from the Virginia House of Burgesses... Assembly is dissolved... The members form an association... General measures against importation... General court convenes in Massachusetts... Its proceedings... Is prorogued... Duties, except for the one on tea, are repealed... Circular letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... New York partially withdraws from the non-importation agreement... This example is followed... Riot in Boston... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

CHAPTER XIV.

Insurrection in North Carolina.... Dissatisfaction of Massachusetts.... Corresponding-committees.... Governor Hutchinson's correspondence communicated by Dr. Franklin.... The assembly petition for his removal.... He is succeeded by General Gage.... Measures to enforce the act concerning duties.... Ferment in America.... The tea thrown into the sea at Boston.... Measures of Parliament.... General enthusiasm in America.... A general congress proposed.... General Gage arrives.... Troops stationed on Boston neck.... New counsellors and judges.... Obliged to resign.... Boston neck fortified.... Military stores seized by General Gage.... Preparations for defence.... King's speech.... Proceedings of Parliament.... Battle of Lexington.... Massachusetts raises men.... Meeting of Congress.... Proceedings of that body.... Transactions in Virginia.... Provincial congress of South Carolina.... Battle of Breed's hill.

Insurrection in North Carolina... Discontent in Massachusetts... Corresponding committees... Governor Hutchinson's letters shared by Dr. Franklin... The assembly requests his removal... He is replaced by General Gage... Actions to enforce the duty act... Unrest in America... The tea dumped into the sea in Boston... Parliamentary measures... Widespread enthusiasm in America... A general congress suggested... General Gage arrives... Troops stationed at Boston Neck... New councilors and judges... Forced to resign... Boston Neck fortified... Military supplies confiscated by General Gage... Defense preparations... The King's speech... Parliamentary proceedings... Battle of Lexington... Massachusetts enlists soldiers... Congress meets... Proceedings of that body... Events in Virginia... Provincial congress of South Carolina... Battle of Bunker Hill.

NOTES

Footnotes


ILLUSTRATIONS

General Washington

Ruins of the Old Brick Church Built at Jamestown In 1639

Plymouth, Massachusetts, in 1622

Penn Seeking Freedom for Imprisoned Friends

Great Meadows and the Site of Fort Necessity

General Braddock's Grave

The Death of Wolfe on the Plains Of Abraham

The Boston Tea Party


INTRODUCTION


CHAPTER I.

Commission of Cabot.... His voyage to America.... Views of discovery relinquished by Henry VII.... Resumed by Elizabeth.... Letters patent to Sir Humphry Gilbert.... His voyages and death.... Patent to Sir Walter Raleigh.... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.... Colonists carried back to England by Drake.... Grenville arrives with other colonists.... They are left on Roanoke Island.... Are destroyed by the Indians.... Arrival of John White.... He returns to England for succour.... Raleigh assigns his patent.... Patent to Sir Thomas Gates and others.... Code of laws for the proposed colony drawn up by the King.

Commission of Cabot.... His voyage to America.... The discovery plans given up by Henry VII.... Taken on again by Elizabeth.... Patents given to Sir Humphry Gilbert.... His voyages and death.... Patent granted to Sir Walter Raleigh.... Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.... Colonists returned to England by Drake.... Grenville arrives with more colonists.... They are left on Roanoke Island.... They are killed by the Indians.... Arrival of John White.... He goes back to England for help.... Raleigh hands over his patent.... Patent given to Sir Thomas Gates and others.... The King drafts a code of laws for the proposed colony.

 

The United States of America extend, on the Atlantic, from the bay of Passamaquoddi in the 45th, to Cape Florida in the 25th, degree of north latitude; and thence, on the gulf of Mexico, including the small adjacent islands to the mouth of the Sabine, in the 17th degree of west longitude from Washington. From the mouth of the Sabine to the Rocky mountains, they are separated from Spanish America by a line which pursues an irregular north-western direction to the 42d degree of north latitude, whence it proceeds west, to the Pacific. On the north they are bounded by the British provinces; from which, between the Lake of the Woods and the Rocky, or Stony mountains, they are separated by the 49th parallel of north latitude. Their northern boundary, west of these mountains, has not yet been adjusted.

USA stretches along the Atlantic Ocean from Passamaquoddy Bay at latitude 45° to Cape Florida at latitude 25°. Moving on to the Gulf of Mexico, it includes the nearby small islands up to the mouth of the Sabine River, which is at 17° west longitude from Washington, D.C. From the Sabine River to the Rocky Mountains, it shares a boundary with Spanish America that follows an irregular northwestern path to latitude 42°, then heads west to the Pacific Ocean. To the north, it's bordered by British territories, with the boundary running along the 49th parallel of latitude between the Lake of the Woods and the Rocky or Stony Mountains. The northern boundary west of these mountains has not yet been determined.

The extent of this vast Republic, in consequence of its recent acquisition of almost unexplored territory, has not yet been accurately ascertained; but may be stated at two millions of square miles.

The size of this huge Republic, due to its recent acquisition of nearly unexplored land, hasn’t been precisely determined yet, but it can be estimated at two million square miles.

Its population, which began on the Atlantic, and is travelling rapidly westward, amounted in 1820, according to the census of that year, to nine millions six hundred and fifty-four thousand four hundred and fifteen persons. The enumerations which have been made under the authority of government, show an augmentation of numbers at the rate of about thirty-four per centum[2] in ten years; and it is probable, that for many years to come, this ratio will not be materially changed.

Its population, which started on the Atlantic and is moving quickly westward, was about nine million six hundred fifty-four thousand four hundred fifteen people in 1820, according to that year's census. The counts conducted by the government indicate an increase of about thirty-four percent[2] every ten years; and it's likely that this rate will not change significantly for many years to come.

Public sentiment, to which the policy of the government conforms, is opposed to a large military establishment; and the distance of the United States from the great powers of the world, protects them from the danger to which this policy might otherwise expose them.

Public sentiment, which the government's policy aligns with, is against having a large military presence; and the distance of the United States from the major world powers protects it from the risks that this policy could otherwise bring.

The navy has become an object of great interest to the nation, and may be expected to grow with its resources. In April 1816, Congress passed an act appropriating one million of dollars annually, to its gradual increase; and authorising the construction of nine ships, to rate not less than seventy-four guns each, and of twelve, to rate not less than forty-four guns each.

The navy has become a major focus for the country and is expected to expand as its resources grow. In April 1816, Congress approved an act allocating one million dollars each year for its gradual development, and authorized the construction of nine ships, each armed with no less than seventy-four guns, and twelve ships, each armed with no less than forty-four guns.

The execution of this act is in rapid progress. Inconsiderable as the navy now is, with respect to the number and force of its ships, it is deemed inferior to none in existence for the bravery and skill of its officers and men. When we take into view the extensive sea coast of the United States, the magnificent lakes, or inland seas, which form a considerable part of their northern frontier, the abundance of their materials for ship building, and the genius of their population for maritime enterprise, it is not easy to resist the conviction that this bulwark of defence will, at no very distant period, attain a size and strength sufficient to ensure the safety of the nation and the respect of the world.

The execution of this plan is moving forward quickly. Although the navy is currently small in terms of the number and strength of its ships, it is considered to be unmatched in bravery and skill among its officers and crew. When we consider the vast coastlines of the United States, the beautiful lakes and inland seas that make up a significant part of the northern border, the plentiful resources for shipbuilding, and the innovative spirit of its people for maritime ventures, it’s hard to deny that this defense will, in the not-too-distant future, grow in size and strength enough to guarantee the nation's safety and earn the respect of the world.

The net revenue of the United States amounted, in the year 1822, to considerably more than twenty millions of dollars; and, unless a course of legislation unfavourable to its augmentation be adopted, must grow with their population.

The net revenue of the United States in 1822 was significantly over twenty million dollars; and, unless a set of laws that hinder its growth is enacted, it is expected to increase with the population.

In arts, in arms, and in power, they have advanced, and are advancing, with unexampled rapidity.

In art, in warfare, and in power, they have progressed, and are continuing to advance, with unprecedented speed.

The history of their progress, from the first feeble settlements made by Europeans on a savage coast, to their present state of greatness; while it has just claims to the attention of the curious of all nations, may be expected deeply to interest every American.

The history of their progress, from the initial weak settlements established by Europeans on a wild coast to their current level of greatness; while it rightfully captures the attention of curious people from all nations, is likely to deeply engage every American.

Soon after the return of Columbus from that memorable voyage which opened the vast regions of the west to civilized man, the maritime states of Europe manifested a desire to share with Spain, the glory, the wealth, and the dominion to be acquired in the new world. By no one of these states, was this desire carried into action more promptly than by England, Henry VII. had received communications from Columbus, during the tedious and uncertain negotiations of that great man, at the dilatory court of Ferdinand, which prepared him for the important discoveries afterwards made, and inclined him to countenance the propositions of his own subjects for engaging in similar adventures. Commission of Cabot.On the 5th of March 1495, he granted a commission to John Cabot, an enterprising Venetian who had settled in Bristol, and to his three sons, Lewis, Sebastian, and Sanctius, empowering them, or either of them, to sail under the banner of England, towards the east, north, or west, in order to discover countries unoccupied by any Christian state, and to take possession of them in his name.

Soon after Columbus returned from that memorable voyage that opened up the vast regions of the west to civilized people, the maritime nations of Europe showed a desire to share in the glory, wealth, and control that could be gained in the new world along with Spain. Among these nations, England acted on this desire more swiftly than the others. Henry VII had received messages from Columbus during the lengthy and uncertain negotiations that this great man had with the slow court of Ferdinand, which prepared him for the significant discoveries that followed and made him more open to supporting his own subjects' proposals for engaging in similar adventures. Cabot Commission. On March 5, 1495, he granted a commission to John Cabot, an enterprising Venetian who had settled in Bristol, and to his three sons, Lewis, Sebastian, and Sanctius, giving them—or any of them—the authority to sail under the English flag to the east, north, or west, to discover lands not occupied by any Christian nation, and to take possession of them in his name.

His voyage to America.

It does not appear that the expedition contemplated at the date of this commission was prosecuted immediately; but in May 1496, Cabot, with his second son, Sebastian, sailed from Bristol in a small squadron, consisting of one ship furnished by the King, and four barks fitted out by merchants of that city; and, steering almost due west, discovered the islands of Newfoundland and St. Johns, and, soon afterward, reached the continent of North America, along which he sailed from the fifty-sixth to the thirty-eighth degree of north latitude, in the vain hope of discovering a passage into the Pacific.

It doesn’t seem like the expedition planned at the date of this commission was carried out right away; however, in May 1496, Cabot, along with his second son, Sebastian, set sail from Bristol in a small fleet made up of one ship provided by the King and four smaller vessels equipped by local merchants. Heading almost directly west, they discovered the islands of Newfoundland and St. Johns, and soon after, reached the mainland of North America, where they navigated from the fifty-sixth to the thirty-eighth degree of north latitude, hoping to find a route to the Pacific.

Thus, according to the English historians, was first discovered that immense continent which stretches from the gulf of Mexico as far north as has yet been explored; and to this voyage, the English trace their title to the country they afterwards acquired by settlement, and by arms.

Thus, according to English historians, the immense continent was first discovered that stretches from the Gulf of Mexico all the way north as far as has been explored; and to this voyage, the English trace their claim to the land they later acquired through settlement and military force.

France, which has since contested with Britain the possession of a considerable portion of this important territory, has also advanced claims to its discovery; but they seem not to be well founded.

France, which has since competed with Britain for control over a significant part of this important territory, has also made claims about its discovery; however, these claims don’t appear to be well-founded.

The scheme of making settlements relinquished.

The ardour which had been excited in the bosom of Henry for making acquisitions in the new world, expired with this first effort. Cabot, on his return, found that monarch entirely disinclined to the farther prosecution of a scheme in which he had engaged with some zeal, the commencement of which had been attended with encouraging appearances.

The enthusiasm that had sparked in Henry for making gains in the New World faded after this first attempt. When Cabot returned, he discovered that the king was completely uninterested in continuing a plan he had initially embraced with some eagerness, despite the promising signs that had marked its start.

Several causes are supposed to have contributed to suspend the pursuits of the English in America. Previous to its discovery, the Portuguese had explored the Azores, or Western Islands; in consequence of which they claimed this continent, and contended for the exclusion of the Spaniards from the Western Ocean. The controversy was decided by the Pope, who, on the 7th of May 1493, of his own "mere liberality and certain knowledge, and the plenitude of apostolic authority," granted to Spain, the countries discovered or to be discovered by her, to the westward of a line to be drawn from pole to pole, a hundred leagues west of the Azores; (excepting such countries as might be in the possession of any other Christian prince antecedent to the year 1493;) and to Portugal, her discoveries eastward of that line.

Several factors are believed to have contributed to the halt of English pursuits in America. Before its discovery, the Portuguese had explored the Azores, or Western Islands; as a result, they claimed this continent and argued for the exclusion of the Spaniards from the Western Ocean. The Pope settled the dispute on May 7, 1493, using his "own mere generosity and certain knowledge, and the fullness of apostolic authority," granting Spain the lands discovered or to be discovered by her, to the west of a line drawn from pole to pole, a hundred leagues west of the Azores; (except for any lands that might be held by other Christian rulers before the year 1493); and to Portugal, her discoveries to the east of that line.

The validity of this grant was probably strengthened, in the opinion of Henry, by other circumstances. He set a high value on the friendship of the King of Spain, with whom he was then negotiating the marriage which afterwards took place between his eldest son and Catharine, the daughter of that monarch. Ferdinand was jealous to excess of all his rights; and Henry was not inclined to interrupt the harmony subsisting between the two crowns, by asserting claims to the country discovered by Cabot, which was obviously within the limits to which the pretensions of Spain extended.

The validity of this grant was likely strengthened, in Henry's view, by other factors. He placed a high value on his friendship with the King of Spain, with whom he was then negotiating the marriage that eventually took place between his eldest son and Catherine, the king's daughter. Ferdinand was extremely protective of all his rights, and Henry wasn't interested in disrupting the harmony between the two crowns by claiming the lands discovered by Cabot, which clearly fell within Spain's claims.

Renewed by Elizabeth.

The fisheries of Newfoundland were carried on by individuals, to a considerable extent, and a paltry traffic was continued with the natives; but no serious design of acquiring territory, and planting colonies in America was formed until the reign of Elizabeth, when a plan for making permanent settlements was proposed and patronized by several persons of rank and influence. To select a man qualified for this arduous task, and disposed to engage in it, was among the first objects to which their attention was directed. Sir Humphry Gilbert had rendered himself conspicuous by his military services, and by a treatise concerning the north-west passage, in which great ingenuity and learning, are stated by Dr. Robertson, to be mingled with the enthusiasm, the credulity, and sanguine expectation which incite men to new and hazardous undertakings. On this gentleman the adventurers turned their eyes, and he was placed at the head of the enterprise. On the 11th of June 1578, he obtained letters patent from the Queen, vesting in him the powers that were required; on receiving which, he, with the associates of his voyage, embarked for America. But his success did not equal his expectations. The various difficulties inseparable from the settlement of a distant, unexplored country, inhabited only by savages; the inadequacy of the supplies which could be furnished for a colony by the funds of a few private individuals; the misfortune of having approached the continent too far towards the north, where the cold barren coast of Cape Breton was rather calculated to repel than invite a settlement; have been assigned as the probable causes of his failure.[3]

The fishing industry in Newfoundland was largely run by individuals, and there was minimal trade with the natives; however, no serious plans for acquiring territory and establishing colonies in America took shape until the reign of Elizabeth. During her time, a plan to create permanent settlements was proposed and supported by several influential figures. One of their first priorities was to find a qualified person willing to take on this challenging task. Sir Humphry Gilbert had gained attention through his military service and a treatise on the northwest passage, which, according to Dr. Robertson, combined great skill and knowledge with the enthusiasm, naivety, and optimistic expectations that drive people toward new and risky ventures. The adventurers focused on him, and he was appointed to lead the project. On June 11, 1578, he received letters patent from the Queen, granting him the necessary powers; after that, he and his voyage associates set off for America. Unfortunately, his success did not match his hopes. The many challenges of settling a remote, uncharted territory inhabited only by Indigenous people; the lack of adequate resources that a few private individuals could provide for a colony; and the misfortune of approaching the continent too far north, where the cold, barren coast of Cape Breton was more likely to repel than attract settlement, have all been suggested as likely reasons for his failure.[3]

Two expeditions conducted by this gentleman ended disastrously. In the last, he himself perished; having done nothing farther in the execution of his patent, than taking possession of the island of Newfoundland, in the name of Elizabeth.

Two expeditions led by this man ended in disaster. In the last one, he lost his life; having done nothing more in the execution of his patent than claiming the island of Newfoundland in the name of Elizabeth.

Sir Walter Raleigh, alike distinguished by his genius, his courage, and the severity of his fate, had been deeply interested in the adventures in which his half brother, Sir Humphry Gilbert, had wasted his fortune, and was not deterred by their failure, or by the difficulties attending such an enterprise, from prosecuting with vigour, a plan so well calculated to captivate his bold and romantic temper.

Sir Walter Raleigh, known for his intelligence, bravery, and tragic fate, was very interested in the adventures his half-brother, Sir Humphry Gilbert, had undertaken, despite having lost his fortune. He wasn't discouraged by their failure or the challenges involved in such ventures; instead, he passionately pursued a plan that perfectly suited his daring and romantic nature.

1584
Patent to Sir Walter Raleigh.

On the 26th of March, he obtained a patent from the Queen; and, on the 27th of April, dispatched two small vessels under the command of captains Amidas and Barlow for the purpose of visiting the country, and of acquiring some previous knowledge of those circumstances which might be essential to the welfare of the colony he was about to plant. To avoid the error of Gilbert in holding too far north, Amidas and Barlow took the route by the Canaries, and the West India islands, and approached the North American continent towards the gulf of Florida. On the 2d of July, they touched at a small island situate on the inlet into Pamplico sound, whence they proceeded to Roanoke, near the mouth of Albemarle sound.

On March 26th, he received a patent from the Queen, and on April 27th, he sent out two small ships led by captains Amidas and Barlow to explore the area and gather important information that would be crucial for the success of the colony he was about to establish. To avoid the mistake Gilbert made by going too far north, Amidas and Barlow took the route through the Canary Islands and the West Indies, approaching the North American mainland near the Gulf of Florida. On July 2nd, they stopped at a small island located at the entrance to Pamlico Sound, before continuing on to Roanoke, near the mouth of Albemarle Sound.

After employing a few weeks in traffic with the Indians, from whom they collected some confused accounts respecting the neighbouring continent, they took with them two of the natives, who willingly accompanied them, and embarked for England, where they arrived on the 15th of September. The splendid description which they gave of the soil, the climate, and the productions of the country they had visited, so pleased Elizabeth, that she bestowed on it the name of Virginia, as a memorial that it had been discovered during the reign of a virgin Queen.[4] Raleigh, encouraged by their report to hasten his preparations for taking possession of the property, fitted out a squadron consisting of seven small ships, laden with arms, ammunition, provisions, and passengers, 1585Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.which sailed from Plymouth on the 9th of April, under the command of Sir Richard Grenville, who was his relation, and interested with him in the patent. Having taken the southern route, and wasted some time in cruising against the Spaniards, Sir Richard did not reach the coast of North America, until the close of the month of June. He touched at both the islands on which Amidas and Barlow had landed, and made some excursions into different parts of the continent around Pamplico, and Albemarle sounds.

After spending a few weeks traveling with the Native Americans, from whom they gathered some mixed accounts about the neighboring continent, they took two of the locals with them, who willingly joined, and set sail for England, arriving on September 15th. The vibrant description they provided of the soil, climate, and resources of the land they had explored delighted Elizabeth so much that she named it Virginia, as a tribute to the fact that it was discovered during the reign of a virgin Queen.[4] Raleigh, inspired by their report, quickly prepared to claim the land and outfitted a squadron of seven small ships filled with guns, ammunition, supplies, and passengers, 1585Voyage of Sir Richard Grenville.which set sail from Plymouth on April 9th, led by Sir Richard Grenville, a relative of his who was also involved in the patent. Taking the southern route and spending some time engaging with the Spaniards, Sir Richard didn’t reach the North American coast until late June. He visited both islands where Amidas and Barlow had landed and made some trips into various areas of the continent around Pamlico and Albemarle sounds.

First colony.

Having established a colony, consisting of one hundred and eight persons, in the island of Roanoke, an incommodious station, without any safe harbour, he committed the government of it to Mr. Ralph Lane; and, on the 25th of August, sailed for England.[5]

Having set up a colony of one hundred and eight people on the island of Roanoke, which was an inconvenient location without a safe harbor, he handed over the leadership to Mr. Ralph Lane and sailed back to England on August 25th.[5]

An insatiate passion for gold, attended by an eager desire to find it in the bowels of the earth, for a long time the disease of Europeans in America, became the scourge of this feeble settlement. The English flattered themselves that the country they had discovered could not be destitute of those mines of the precious metals with which Spanish America abounded. The most diligent researches were made in quest of them; and the infatuating hope of finding them stimulated the colonists to the utmost exertions of which they were capable. The Indians soon discerned the object for which they searched with so much avidity, and amused them with tales of rich mines in countries they had not yet explored. Seduced by this information, they encountered incredible hardships, and, in this vain search wasted that time which ought to have been employed in providing the means of future subsistence. Mutual suspicion and disgust between them and the natives ripened into open hostility; and, the provisions brought from England being exhausted, they were under the necessity of resorting for food to the precarious supplies which could be drawn from the rivers and woods. 1586In this state of distress, they were found, in June, by Sir Francis Drake, who was then returning from a successful expedition against the Spaniards in the West Indies. He agreed to supply them with about one hundred men, four months' provisions, and a small vessel; but, before she could be brought into a place of security, and the men and stores disembarked, she was driven out to sea by a sudden and violent storm. Colonists carried back to England by Drake.Discouraged by this misfortune, and worn out with fatigue and famine, the colonists unanimously determined to abandon the colony, and were, at their own request, taken on board the fleet which sailed for England.[6]

An insatiable craving for gold, combined with a strong desire to find it buried deep in the earth, plagued Europeans in America for a long time and became a curse for this struggling settlement. The English believed that the land they had discovered must have the same rich deposits of precious metals that Spanish America had. They made diligent searches for these mines, and the exciting hope of finding them pushed the colonists to their limits. The Native Americans quickly noticed what the colonists were searching for and entertained them with stories of rich mines in lands they hadn’t yet seen. Misled by this information, the colonists faced unimaginable hardships and wasted precious time that should have been spent securing future food supplies. Mutual distrust and dislike between them and the locals escalated into open conflict; as their provisions from England ran out, they had no choice but to rely on the unreliable resources available from rivers and forests. 1586In this desperate situation, they were discovered in June by Sir Francis Drake, who was returning from a successful mission against the Spaniards in the West Indies. He promised to send them about one hundred men, four months' worth of food, and a small ship; however, before it could be safely anchored and the men and supplies unloaded, a sudden and fierce storm forced it out to sea. Drake brought colonists back to England.Discouraged by this setback and exhausted by hunger and fatigue, the colonists unanimously decided to leave the settlement and requested to be taken aboard the fleet heading back to England.[6]

Thus terminated the first English colony planted in America. The only acquisition made by this expensive experiment, was a better knowledge of the country and its inhabitants.

Thus ended the first English colony established in America. The only gain from this costly attempt was a better understanding of the land and its people.

Grenville plants a second colony.

A few days after the departure of Drake with Lane and his associates, a small vessel which had been dispatched by Raleigh with a supply of provisions, reached its place of destination. Not finding the colonists, this vessel returned to England. Soon after its departure, Sir Richard Grenville arrived with three ships and ample supplies. Having searched in vain for the colonists he had left, and being unable to conjecture their fate, he placed fifteen men in the island with provisions for two years, for the purpose of retaining possession of the country, and returned to England. Destroyed by the Indians.This small party was soon destroyed by the Indians.

A few days after Drake left with Lane and his crew, a small ship that Raleigh had sent with supplies arrived at its destination. Not finding the colonists, this ship headed back to England. Shortly after it left, Sir Richard Grenville showed up with three ships and plenty of supplies. After searching unsuccessfully for the colonists he had left behind and being unable to guess what happened to them, he left fifteen men on the island with enough provisions for two years to keep hold of the territory and returned to England. Destroyed by Indigenous people. This small group was soon wiped out by the Indians.

1587

Not discouraged by the ill success which had thus far attended his efforts to make a settlement in America, Raleigh, in the following year, fitted out three ships under the command of captain John White, and, it is said, directed the colony to be removed to the waters of the Chesapeake, which bay had been discovered by Lane in the preceding year. Instructed by calamity, he adopted more efficacious means for preserving and continuing the colony than had before been used. The number of men was greater; they were accompanied by some women, and their supply of provisions was more abundant. Mr. White was appointed their governor, twelve assistants were assigned him as a council, and a charter incorporating them by the name of the governor and assistants of the city of Raleigh in Virginia, was granted them.

Not discouraged by the unsuccessful attempts he had made to establish a settlement in America, Raleigh, in the following year, outfitted three ships under the command of Captain John White and reportedly decided to move the colony to the Chesapeake Bay, which Lane had discovered the previous year. Learning from past mistakes, he implemented more effective strategies for supporting and sustaining the colony than had been used before. The group was larger; they included some women, and their food supply was more plentiful. Mr. White was appointed as their governor, and twelve assistants were assigned to him as a council, along with a charter that incorporated them as the governor and assistants of the City of Raleigh in Virginia.

Third colony arrives.

Thus prepared for a permanent settlement, they arrived in July at Roanoke, where they received the melancholy intelligence of the loss of their countrymen who had been left there by Sir Richard Grenville. They determined, however, to remain at the same place, and began to make the necessary preparations for their accommodation. Aware of the danger to be apprehended from the hostile disposition of their neighbours, they endeavoured to effect a reconciliation with the natives, one of whom, who had accompanied Amidas and Barlow to England, and who was distinguished by his unshaken attachment to the English, was christened, and styled Lord of Dassa Monpeake, an Indian nation in the neighbourhood.[7]

Thus ready for a permanent settlement, they arrived in July at Roanoke, where they received the sad news of the loss of their fellow countrymen who had been left there by Sir Richard Grenville. They decided to stay in the same place and began making the necessary preparations for their accommodations. Aware of the potential danger from the hostile attitude of their neighbors, they tried to reconcile with the natives, one of whom, who had accompanied Amidas and Barlow to England and was known for his unwavering loyalty to the English, was baptized and titled Lord of Dassa Monpeake, an Indian nation nearby.[7]

About the same time the first child of English parentage was born in America. She was the daughter of Ananias Dare, and, after the place of her birth, was named Virginia.

About the same time, the first child of English descent was born in America. She was the daughter of Ananias Dare and was named Virginia after her birthplace.

Soon perceiving their want of many things essential to the preservation, and comfortable subsistence of a new settlement, the colonists, with one voice, deputed their governor, to solicit those specific aids which their situation particularly and essentially required. On his arrival in England, he found the whole nation alarmed at the formidable preparations for their invasion, made by Philip II. of Spain; and Raleigh, Grenville, and the other patrons of the colony, ardently engaged in those measures of defence which the public danger demanded. Mingling, however, with his exertions to defend his native country, some attention to the colony he had planted, Raleigh found leisure to fit out a small fleet for its relief, the command of which was given to Sir Richard Grenville; but, the apprehensions from the Spanish armament still increasing, the ships of force prepared by Raleigh were detained in port by order of the Queen, and Sir Richard Grenville was commanded not to leave Cornwall, where his services were deemed necessary. 1588On the 22d of April, White put to sea with two small barks, but, instead of hastening to the relief of his distressed countrymen, wasted his time in cruising; and, being beaten by a superior force, was totally disabled from prosecuting his voyage.[8]

Soon realizing they lacked many essential items for the survival and comfort of a new settlement, the colonists unanimously chose their governor to request the specific help they urgently needed. Upon arriving in England, he discovered the entire nation was on alert due to the significant preparations for invasion by Philip II of Spain; Raleigh, Grenville, and the other supporters of the colony were actively involved in defense measures that the public threat demanded. However, alongside his efforts to protect his homeland, Raleigh managed to organize a small fleet to assist the colony he had established, placing Sir Richard Grenville in command. Yet, as fears regarding the Spanish military grew, the ships Raleigh had prepared were held back in port by the Queen's order, and Sir Richard Grenville was instructed not to leave Cornwall, where his skills were seen as necessary. 1588 On April 22, White set sail with two small ships, but instead of rushing to help his struggling fellow countrymen, he wasted time cruising around, and when faced with a larger enemy force, he was completely unable to continue his journey.[8]

1589
Raleigh assigns his patent.

The attention of Raleigh being directed to other more splendid objects, he assigned his patent to Sir Thomas Smith and a company of merchants in London.

The focus of Raleigh shifted to other, more impressive opportunities, so he granted his patent to Sir Thomas Smith and a group of merchants in London.

1590

After this transfer, a year was permitted to elapse before any effort was made for the relief of the colony. In March, three ships fitted out by the company, in one of which Mr. White embarked, sailed from Plymouth; but, having cruelly and criminally wasted their time in plundering the Spaniards in the West Indies, they did not reach Hatteras until the month of August. Third colony lost.They fired a gun to give notice of their arrival, and sent a party to the place where the colony had been left; but no vestige of their countrymen could be found. In attempting the next day to go to Roanoke, one of the boats, in passing a bar, was half filled with water, another was overset, and six men were drowned. Two other boats were fitted out with nineteen men to search the island thoroughly on which the colony had been left.

After this transfer, a year went by before any action was taken to help the colony. In March, three ships set out from Plymouth, equipped by the company, and Mr. White was on one of them. However, they wasted time looting the Spanish in the West Indies and didn’t arrive at Hatteras until August. Third colony lost. They fired a gun to signal their arrival and sent a group to the spot where the colony had been left, but there was no sign of their fellow countrymen. The next day, when they tried to reach Roanoke, one of the boats took on water while crossing a sandbar, another capsized, and six men drowned. Two other boats were prepared with nineteen men to thoroughly search the island where the colony had been left.

At the departure of Mr. White, it was in contemplation to remove about fifty miles into the country; and it had been agreed that, should the colonists leave the island, they would carve the name of the place to which they should remove, on some tree, door, or post; with the addition of a cross over it, as a signal of distress, if they should be really distressed at the time of changing their situation. After considerable search, the word CROATAN was found carved in fair capital letters on one of the chief posts, but unaccompanied by the sign of distress which had been agreed on.

At Mr. White's departure, there was a plan to move about fifty miles into the countryside; it was agreed that if the colonists left the island, they would carve the name of their new location on a tree, door, or post. They would also add a cross above it as a signal of distress, should they truly be in trouble during their transition. After a thorough search, the word CROATAN was discovered carved in neat capital letters on one of the main posts, but it was missing the distress sign they had agreed upon.

Croatan was the name of an Indian town on the north side of Cape Lookout, and for that place, the fleet weighed anchor the next day. Meeting with a storm, and several accidents, they were discouraged from proceeding on their voyage, and, determining to suspend their search, returned to the West Indies.

Croatan was the name of an Indian town on the north side of Cape Lookout, and the fleet set sail for that place the next day. They encountered a storm and several setbacks, which discouraged them from continuing their journey. Deciding to halt their search, they returned to the West Indies.

The company made no farther attempt to find these lost colonists; nor has the time or the manner of their perishing ever been discovered.[9]

The company made no further attempts to find these lost colonists, nor has the time or the way they died ever been discovered.[9]

1602
Voyage of Gosnald.

The subsequent voyages made by the English to North America were for the sole purpose of traffic, and were unimportant in their consequences, until the year 1602, when one was undertaken by Bartholomew Gosnald, which contributed greatly to the revival of the then dormant spirit of colonising in the new world. He sailed from Falmouth in a small bark with thirty-two men; and steering nearly west, reached the American continent, on the 11th of May, in about forty-three degrees of north latitude.

The following trips by the English to North America were solely for trade and had little impact, until 1602, when Bartholomew Gosnold led a voyage that significantly reignited interest in colonizing the New World. He set sail from Falmouth in a small ship with thirty-two men and, heading nearly west, reached the American continent on May 11th, around forty-three degrees north latitude.

Finding no good harbour at this place, Gosnald put to sea again and stood southward. The next morning, he descried a promontory which he called cape Cod, and, holding his course along the coast as it stretched to the south-west, touched at two islands, the first of which he named Martha's Vineyard, and the second, Elizabeth's Island. Having passed some time at these places, examining the country, and trading with the natives, he returned to England.[10]

Finding no good harbor at this location, Gosnald set sail again and headed south. The next morning, he spotted a promontory which he named Cape Cod, and, continuing along the coast as it stretched to the southwest, he visited two islands, the first of which he named Martha's Vineyard, and the second, Elizabeth's Island. After spending some time in these areas, exploring the land and trading with the locals, he returned to England.[10]

This voyage was completed in less than four months, and was attended with important consequences. Gosnald had found a healthy climate, a rich soil, good harbours, and a route which shortened considerably the distance to the continent of North America. He had seen many of the fruits known and prized in Europe, blooming in the woods; and had planted European grain which grew rapidly. Encouraged by this experiment, and delighted with the country, he formed the resolution of transporting thither a colony, and of procuring the co-operation of others by whom his plan might be supported. So unfortunate however had been former attempts of this sort, that men of wealth and rank, though strongly impressed by his report of the country, were slow in giving full faith to his representations, and in entering completely into his views. One vessel was fitted out by the merchants of Bristol, and another by the earl of Southampton, and Lord Arundel of Wardour, in order to learn whether Gosnald's account of the country was to be considered as a just representation of its state, or as the exaggerated description of a person fond of magnifying his own discoveries. Both returned with a full confirmation of his veracity, and with the addition of so many new circumstances in favour of the country, as greatly increased the desire of settling it.

This journey was completed in under four months and had significant outcomes. Gosnald discovered a healthy climate, rich soil, good harbors, and a route that greatly reduced the distance to North America. He saw many fruits known and valued in Europe thriving in the woods, and he planted European grain that grew quickly. Encouraged by this experiment and thrilled with the land, he resolved to bring a colony there and to gain the support of others for his plan. However, past attempts of this kind had gone poorly, so wealthy and influential people, despite being strongly impressed by his report of the land, were hesitant to fully trust his claims and commit to his plans. One ship was outfitted by merchants from Bristol, and another by the Earl of Southampton and Lord Arundel of Wardour, to determine whether Gosnald's description of the country was an accurate representation or merely an exaggerated account from someone boasting about his own discoveries. Both ships returned confirming his truthfulness, along with many new factors in favor of the land, which greatly increased the interest in settling it.

Richard Hackluyt, prebendary of Westminster, a man of distinguished learning and intelligence, contributed more than any other by his judicious exertions, to form an association sufficiently extensive, powerful, and wealthy, to execute the often renewed, and often disappointed project of establishing colonies in America.

Richard Hackluyt, prebendary of Westminster, a man of notable knowledge and intelligence, contributed more than anyone else through his wise efforts to create a group that was large enough, influential enough, and wealthy enough to carry out the frequently revisited and frequently frustrated goal of setting up colonies in America.

At length, such an association was formed; and a petition was presented to James I., who had succeeded to the crown of England, praying the royal sanction to the plan which was proposed. That pacific monarch was delighted with it, and immediately acceded to the wishes of its projectors.

At last, a group was formed, and a petition was submitted to James I., who had taken the throne of England, asking for royal approval of the proposed plan. That peaceful king was thrilled with it and quickly agreed to the wishes of its creators.

Patent to Sir Thomas Gates and others.

On the 10th of April, letters patent were issued under the great seal of England, to the petitioners, Sir Thomas Gates and his associates, granting to them those territories in America, lying on the sea coast, between the 34th and 45th degrees of north latitude, and which either belonged to that monarch, or were not then possessed by any other Christian prince or people; and also the islands adjacent thereto, or within one hundred miles thereof. They were divided, at their own desire, into two companies. One, consisting of certain knights, gentlemen, merchants, and other adventurers of the city of London, and elsewhere, was called the first colony, and was required to settle between the 34th and 41st degrees of north latitude; the other, consisting of certain knights, gentlemen, merchants, and other adventurers of Bristol, Exeter, Plymouth, and elsewhere, was named the second colony, and was ordered to settle between the 38th and 45th degrees of north latitude; yet so that the colony last formed should not be planted within one hundred miles of the prior establishment.

On April 10th, letters patent were issued under the great seal of England to the petitioners, Sir Thomas Gates and his associates, granting them territories in America along the coast, between the 34th and 45th degrees of north latitude, which either belonged to that monarch or were not currently owned by any other Christian prince or people; as well as the nearby islands or those within a hundred miles of the mainland. They chose to split into two companies. One group, made up of certain knights, gentlemen, merchants, and other adventurers from London and other areas, was called the first colony, and was required to settle between the 34th and 41st degrees of north latitude. The other group, consisting of certain knights, gentlemen, merchants, and other adventurers from Bristol, Exeter, Plymouth, and other locations, was named the second colony, and was instructed to settle between the 38th and 45th degrees of north latitude, ensuring that the newly formed colony would not be established within a hundred miles of the first colony.

The adventurers were empowered to transport so many English subjects as should be willing to accompany them, who, with their descendants, were, at all times, to enjoy the same liberties, within any other dominions of the crown of England, as if they had remained, or were born, within the realm. A council consisting of thirteen, to be appointed and removed at the pleasure of the crown, was established for each colony, to govern it according to such laws as should be given under the sign manual and privy seal of England.

The adventurers were allowed to bring along as many English subjects as wanted to join them, who, along with their descendants, would always have the same freedoms in any other territories of the English crown as if they had stayed or been born in the kingdom. A council of thirteen, appointed and dismissed at the crown's discretion, was set up for each colony to govern it based on the laws issued under the official seal of England.

Two other boards to consist also of thirteen persons each, and to be appointed by the King, were invested with the superior direction of the affairs of the colonies.

Two other boards, each made up of thirteen members, were also appointed by the King and were given the ultimate authority over colonial affairs.

The adventurers were allowed to search for, and open mines of gold, silver, and copper, yielding one-fifth of the two former metals, and one-fifteenth of the last, to the King; and to make a coin which should be current both among the colonists and natives.

The adventurers were permitted to search for and open mines of gold, silver, and copper, giving one-fifth of the first two metals and one-fifteenth of the last to the King; and to create a coin that would be accepted by both the colonists and the natives.

The president and council were authorised to repel those who should, without their authority, attempt to settle, or trade, within their jurisdiction, and to seize, and detain the persons, and effects, of such intruders, until they should pay a duty of two and one-half per centum ad valorem, if subjects, but of five per centum if aliens. These taxes were to be applied, for twenty-one years, to the use of the adventurers, and were afterwards to be paid into the royal exchequer.

The president and council were empowered to drive away anyone who tried to settle or trade within their area without permission, and to confiscate and hold the belongings and individuals of such trespassers until they paid a duty of two and a half percent if they were locals, or five percent if they were foreigners. These taxes were to be used by the adventurers for twenty-one years and were then to be sent to the royal treasury.

Code of laws for the colony drawn up by the King.

While the council for the patentees were employed in making preparations to secure the benefits of their grant, James was assiduously engaged in the new, and, to his vanity, the flattering task of framing a code of laws for the government of the colonies about to be planted. Having at length prepared this code, he issued it under the sign manual, and privy seal of England. By these regulations, he vested the general superintendence of the colonies, in a council in England, "composed of a few persons of consideration and talents." The church of England was established. The legislative and executive powers within the colonies, were vested in the president and councils; but their ordinances were not to touch life or member, were to continue in force only until made void by the King, or his council in England for Virginia, and were to be in substance, consonant to the laws of England. They were enjoined to permit none to withdraw the people from their allegiance to himself, and his successors; and to cause all persons so offending to be apprehended, and imprisoned until reformation; or, in cases highly offensive, to be sent to England to receive punishment. No person was to be permitted to remain in the colony without taking the oath of obedience. Tumults, mutiny, and rebellion, murder, and incest, were to be punished with death; and for these offences, the criminal was to be tried by a jury. Inferior crimes were to be punished in a summary way, at the discretion of the president and council.

While the council for the patent holders was busy making arrangements to secure the benefits of their grant, James was diligently focused on the new and, to his pride, flattering task of creating a code of laws for the governance of the upcoming colonies. Having finally completed this code, he issued it under the official seal and privy seal of England. Through these regulations, he placed the overall management of the colonies in a council in England, "made up of a few respected individuals with talent." The Church of England was established. The legislative and executive powers within the colonies were granted to the president and councils; however, their laws could not affect life or limb, would remain in force only until revoked by the King or his council in England for Virginia, and were to be in line with the laws of England. They were instructed to allow no one to lead the people away from their loyalty to him and his successors, and to ensure that anyone offending in this way would be arrested and imprisoned until they could be corrected; or, in particularly serious cases, sent to England for punishment. No one was allowed to stay in the colony without taking an oath of obedience. Riots, mutiny, rebellion, murder, and incest were to be punishable by death; and for these crimes, the accused would be tried by a jury. Lesser crimes would be punished summarily at the discretion of the president and council.

Lands were to be holden within the colony as the same estates were enjoyed in England. Kindness towards the heathen was enjoined; and a power reserved to the King, and his successors to ordain farther laws, so that they were consonant to the jurisprudence of England.[11]

Lands were to be held in the colony just as the same estates were enjoyed in England. Kindness toward the Indigenous people was required; and a power was reserved for the King and his successors to create further laws, as long as they were consistent with English law.[11]

Under this charter, and these laws, which manifest, at the same time, a total disregard of all political liberty, and a total ignorance of the real advantages which a parent state may derive from its colonies; which vest the higher powers of legislation in persons residing out of the country, not chosen by the people, nor affected by the laws they make, and yet leave commerce unrestrained; the patentees proceeded to execute the arduous and almost untried task of peopling a strange, distant, and uncultivated land, covered with woods and marshes, and inhabited only by savages easily irritated, and when irritated, more fierce than the beasts they hunted.

Under this charter and these laws, which show both a complete disregard for all political freedom and a total ignorance of the true benefits a parent state can gain from its colonies; which assign the highest legislative powers to people outside the country, who are not elected by the citizens and are not affected by the laws they create, while still allowing commerce to flow freely; the patentees took on the challenging and largely untested task of settling a strange, distant, and undeveloped land, filled with forests and swamps, and inhabited only by easily provoked natives who, when angered, were even fiercer than the animals they hunted.


CHAPTER II.

Voyage of Newport.... Settlement at Jamestown.... Distress of colonists.... Smith.... He is captured by the Indians.... Condemned to death, saved by Pocahontas.... Returns to Jamestown.... Newport arrives with fresh settlers.... Smith explores the Chesapeake.... Is chosen president.... New charter.... Third voyage of Newport.... Smith sails for Europe.... Condition of the colony.... Colonists determine to abandon the country.... Are stopped by Lord Delaware.... Sir Thomas Dale.... New charter.... Capt. Argal seizes Pocahontas.... She marries Mr. Rolf.... Separate property in lands and labour.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Manhadoes.... Fifty acres of land for each settler.... Tobacco.... Sir Thomas Dale.... Mr. Yeardley.... First assembly.... First arrival of females.... Of convicts.... Of African slaves.... Two councils established.... Prosperity of the colony.... Indians attempt to massacre the whites.... General war.... Dissolution of the company.... Arbitrary measures of the crown.... Sir John Harvey.... Sir William Berkeley.... Provincial assembly restored.... Virginia declares in favour of Charles II.... Grant to Lord Baltimore.... Arrival of a colony in Maryland.... Assembly composed of freemen.... William Clayborne.... Assembly composed of representatives.... Divided into two branches.... Tyrannical proceedings.

Voyage of Newport.... Settlement at Jamestown.... Hardships of the colonists.... Smith.... He gets captured by the Indians.... Sentenced to death, saved by Pocahontas.... Returns to Jamestown.... Newport arrives with new settlers.... Smith explores the Chesapeake.... Is elected president.... New charter.... Third voyage of Newport.... Smith sails to Europe.... Condition of the colony.... Colonists decide to leave the area.... Are stopped by Lord Delaware.... Sir Thomas Dale.... New charter.... Capt. Argal captures Pocahontas.... She marries Mr. Rolf.... Separate property in lands and labor.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Manhadoes.... Fifty acres of land for each settler.... Tobacco.... Sir Thomas Dale.... Mr. Yeardley.... First assembly.... First arrival of women.... Of convicts.... Of African slaves.... Two councils established.... Prosperity of the colony.... Indians attempt to attack the whites.... General war.... Dissolution of the company.... Arbitrary actions of the crown.... Sir John Harvey.... Sir William Berkeley.... Provincial assembly restored.... Virginia supports Charles II.... Grant to Lord Baltimore.... Arrival of a colony in Maryland.... Assembly made up of freemen.... William Clayborne.... Assembly composed of representatives.... Divided into two branches.... Oppressive actions.

 

The funds immediately appropriated to the planting of colonies in America, were inconsiderable, and the early efforts to accomplish the object, were feeble.

The money quickly allocated for the establishment of colonies in America was minimal, and the initial attempts to achieve this goal were weak.

The first expedition for the southern colony consisted of one vessel of a hundred tons, and two barks, carrying one hundred and five men, destined to remain in the country.

The first trip for the southern colony included one ship of a hundred tons and two smaller boats, carrying one hundred and five men, meant to stay in the country.

1606
Voyage of Newport.

The command of this small squadron was given to captain Newport, who, on the 19th of December, sailed from the Thames. Three sealed packets were delivered to him, one addressed to himself, a second to captain Bartholomew Gosnald, and the third to captain John Radcliffe, containing the names of the council for this colony. These packets were accompanied with instructions directing that they should be opened, and the names of his Majesty's council proclaimed, within twenty-four hours after their arrival on the coast of Virginia, and not before. The council were then to proceed to the choice of a president, who was to have two votes. To this unaccountable concealment have those dissensions been attributed, which distracted the colonists on their passage, and which afterwards impeded the progress of their settlement.[12]

The command of this small squadron was given to Captain Newport, who sailed from the Thames on December 19th. Three sealed packets were delivered to him: one addressed to himself, a second to Captain Bartholomew Gosnald, and the third to Captain John Radcliffe, containing the names of the council for this colony. These packets came with instructions stating that they should be opened and the names of His Majesty's council announced within twenty-four hours after their arrival on the coast of Virginia, and not before. The council was then to choose a president, who would have two votes. This puzzling secrecy has been blamed for the conflicts that troubled the colonists during their voyage and later hindered the progress of their settlement.[12]

1607
Is driven into the Chesapeake.

Newport, whose place of destination was Roanoke, took the circuitous route by the West India islands, and had a long passage of four months. The reckoning had been out for three days, and serious propositions had been made for returning to England, when a fortunate storm drove him to the mouth of the Chesapeake. On the 26th of April, he descried cape Henry, and soon afterward cape Charles. A party of about thirty men, which went on shore at cape Henry, was immediately attacked by the natives, and, in the skirmish which ensued, several were wounded on both sides.

Newport, whose destination was Roanoke, took the long route through the West Indies and faced a lengthy journey of four months. They had been without a reckoning for three days, and serious discussions had begun about going back to England when a lucky storm pushed them to the mouth of the Chesapeake. On April 26th, he spotted Cape Henry and shortly after, Cape Charles. A group of about thirty men that went ashore at Cape Henry was quickly attacked by the locals, and in the ensuing skirmish, several people were injured on both sides.

The first act of the colonists was the selection of a spot for their settlement. They proceeded up a large river, called by the natives Powhatan, and agreed to make their first establishment upon a peninsula, on its northern side. In compliment to their sovereign, this place was named Jamestown, and the river was called James. May 13th.Having disembarked, and opened the sealed packets brought from England, the members of the council proceeded to the election of a president, and Mr. Wingfield was chosen. But, under frivolous pretexts, they excluded from his seat among them, John Smith, one of the most extraordinary men of his age, whose courage and talents had excited their envy. During the passage, he had been imprisoned on the extravagant charge of intending to murder the council, usurp the government, and make himself king of Virginia.[13]

The first thing the colonists did was choose a location for their settlement. They traveled up a large river, known to the natives as Powhatan, and decided to establish their first settlement on a peninsula on the northern side. In honor of their king, they named this place Jamestown and called the river James. May 13. After landing and opening the sealed packets sent from England, the council members moved forward with electing a president, and Mr. Wingfield was selected. However, they expelled John Smith from the council for trivial reasons. He was one of the most remarkable individuals of his time, and his courage and skills had sparked their jealousy. During the journey, he had been imprisoned on the ridiculous accusation of trying to murder the council, take over the government, and declare himself king of Virginia.[13]

The first indications of a permanent settlement in their country, seem to have excited the jealousy of the natives. Displeased with the intrusion, or dissatisfied with the conduct of the intruders, they soon formed the design of expelling, or destroying, these unwelcome and formidable visitors. In execution of this intention, they attacked the colonists suddenly, while at work, and unsuspicious of their hostility; but were driven, terrified, into the woods by the fire from the ship. On the failure of this attempt, a temporary accommodation was effected.

The first signs of a permanent settlement in their land seem to have stirred jealousy among the locals. Unhappy with the intrusion or dissatisfied with how the newcomers acted, they quickly planned to drive out or eliminate these unwelcome and formidable visitors. To carry out this plan, they suddenly attacked the colonists while they were working and unaware of the threat; however, they were frightened and fled into the woods by the gunfire from the ship. After this attempt failed, a temporary agreement was reached.

Newport, though named of the council, had been ordered to return to England. As the time of his departure approached, the accusers of Smith, attempting to conceal their jealousy by the affectation of humanity, proposed that he also should return, instead of being prosecuted in Virginia; but, with the pride of conscious innocence, he demanded a trial; and, being honourably acquitted, took his seat in the council.

Newport, although appointed by the council, had been told to go back to England. As his departure neared, Smith's accusers, trying to hide their jealousy behind a facade of compassion, suggested that he should also go back instead of facing charges in Virginia. However, with the confidence of someone who knows they are innocent, he requested a trial. After being honorably cleared of the accusations, he took his place in the council.

About the 15th of June, Newport sailed for England, leaving behind him one of the barks, and about one hundred colonists. While he remained, they had partaken of the food allowed the sailors; but after his departure, they were reduced to the necessity of subsisting on the distributions from the public stores, which had sustained great damage during their long passage. These were both scanty, and unwholesome; the allowance to each man, for a day, being only a pint of worm-eaten wheat and barley. This wretched food increased the malignity of the diseases generated by the climate, among men exposed to all its rigours. Before the month of September, fifty of the company were buried; among whom was Bartholomew Gosnald, who had planned the expedition, and had contributed greatly towards its prosecution. Their distress was increased by internal dissension. The president was charged with embezzling the best stores of the colony, and with feasting at his private table, on beef, bread, and aqua vitæ, while famine and death devoured his fellow adventurers. The odium against him was completed by the detection of an attempt to escape from them and their calamities, in the bark which had been left by Newport. In the burst of general indignation which followed the discovery of this meditated desertion, he was deposed, and Radcliffe chosen to succeed him.[14]

Around June 15th, Newport set sail for England, leaving one of the ships and about a hundred colonists behind. While he was there, they shared the crew’s rations, but after he left, they had to rely on supplies from the public stores, which had suffered significant damage during their long journey. These provisions were both limited and of poor quality; each person received just a pint of worm-infested wheat and barley per day. This terrible food worsened the illnesses caused by the harsh climate, hitting those exposed to its extremes especially hard. By September, fifty members of the group had died, including Bartholomew Gosnald, who had planned the expedition and significantly contributed to its efforts. Their suffering was worsened by internal conflict. The president was accused of stealing the colony's best supplies and enjoying lavish meals of beef, bread, and aqua vitæ, while famine and death plagued his fellow adventurers. The anger against him intensified when it was discovered that he had tried to escape the colony and its troubles on the ship that Newport had left behind. In the wake of this betrayal, he was removed from his position, and Radcliffe was appointed to take his place.[14]

As misfortune is not unfrequently the parent of moderation and reflection, this state of misery produced a system of conduct towards the neighbouring Indians, which, for the moment, disarmed their resentments, and induced them to bring in such supplies as the country afforded at that season. It produced another effect of equal importance. A sense of imminent and common danger called forth those talents which were fitted to the exigency, and compelled submission to them. On captain Smith, who had preserved his health unimpaired, his spirits unbroken, and his judgment unclouded, amidst this general misery and dejection, all eyes were turned, and in him, all actual authority was placed by common consent. His example soon gave energy to others.

As misfortune often leads to moderation and reflection, this state of suffering created a way of dealing with the neighboring Indians that, for the time being, eased their anger and prompted them to bring in whatever supplies were available in the area during that season. It also had another important effect. A sense of imminent and shared danger brought out the talents suited for the situation and forced others to accept their leadership. All eyes were on Captain Smith, who had maintained his health, kept his spirits high, and his judgment clear amidst the widespread misery and despair. By common consent, he was given all actual authority. His example quickly inspired others.

He erected such rude fortifications as would resist the sudden attacks of the savages, and constructed such habitations as, by sheltering the survivors from the weather, contributed to restore and preserve their health, while his own accommodation gave place to that of all others. In the season of gathering corn, he penetrated into the country at the head of small parties, and by presents and caresses to those who were well disposed, and by attacking with open force, and defeating those who were hostile, he obtained abundant supplies.

He built rough fortifications to protect against sudden attacks from the locals and created shelters that helped keep the survivors safe from the weather, aiding in their recovery and health, while he sacrificed his own comfort for the sake of others. During the corn harvest season, he ventured into the land leading small groups, gaining plentiful supplies by winning over the friendly with gifts and kindness, and confronting and defeating those who were hostile.

While thus actively and usefully employed abroad, he was not permitted to withdraw his attention from the domestic concerns of the colony. Incapacity for command is seldom accompanied by a willingness to relinquish power; and it will excite no surprise that the late president saw, with regret, another placed above him. As unworthy minds most readily devise unworthy means, he sought, by intriguing with the factious, and fomenting their discontents, to regain his lost authority; and when these attempts were disconcerted, he formed a conspiracy with some of the principal persons in the colony, to escape in the bark, and thus to desert the country. The vigilance of Smith detected these machinations, and his vigour defeated them.[15]

While he was actively and productively working abroad, he wasn’t allowed to ignore the local issues in the colony. Those who are unfit for leadership rarely want to give up power; so it’s not surprising that the former president felt upset seeing someone else take his place. Those with unworthy minds often come up with unworthy plans, and he tried to regain his lost authority by scheming with the dissenters and stirring up their discontent. When those plans fell apart, he conspired with some of the key figures in the colony to escape on a small boat and abandon the country. Smith’s vigilance uncovered these plots, and his determination thwarted them.[15]

Smith is captured by the Indians,

The prospect which now presented itself of preserving the colony in quiet and plenty, until supplies could be received from England, was obscured by an event which threatened, at first, the most disastrous consequences. In attempting to explore Chiccahomini river to its source, Smith was discovered and attacked by a numerous body of Indians; and in endeavouring, after a gallant defence, to make his escape, he sank up to his neck in a swamp, and was obliged to surrender. The wonder and veneration which he excited by the exhibition of a mariner's compass, saved him from immediate death. He was conducted in triumph, through several towns, to the palace of Powhatan, the most potent king in that part of the country, is condemned to death,who doomed him to be put to death by placing his head upon a stone, and beating out his brains with a club. At the place of execution, with his head bowed down to receive the blow, he was rescued from a fate which appeared to be inevitable, by that enthusiastic and impassioned humanity which, in every climate, and in every state of society, finds its home in the female bosom. saved by Pocahontas.Pocahontas, the king's favourite daughter, then about thirteen years of age, whose entreaties for his life had been ineffectual, rushed between him and the executioner, and folding his head in her arms, and laying hers upon it, arrested the fatal blow. Her father was then prevailed upon to spare his life, and he was sent back to Jamestown.[16]

The chance to keep the colony safe and well-fed until supplies arrived from England was dimmed by an event that initially threatened to have disastrous consequences. While trying to explore the Chiccahomini River to its source, Smith was discovered and attacked by a large group of Indians. After a brave defense, as he tried to escape, he sank up to his neck in a swamp and had to surrender. The awe and respect he inspired by showing them a mariner's compass saved him from immediate death. He was taken in triumph through several towns to the palace of Powhatan, the most powerful king in that area, is sentenced to death, who sentenced him to die by placing his head on a stone and crushing it with a club. At the execution site, with his head bowed to receive the fatal blow, he was saved from what seemed like an unavoidable fate by that passionate and devoted humanity that exists in every culture and society within the hearts of women. saved by Pocahontas.Pocahontas, the king's favorite daughter, who was around thirteen years old at the time, rushed between him and the executioner, wrapping her arms around his head and laying her own head on top of his, stopping the lethal blow. Her father was persuaded to spare his life, and he was sent back to Jamestown.[16]

Returns to Jamestown.

On arriving at that place, after an absence of seven weeks, he found the colony reduced to thirty-eight persons, who seemed determined to abandon a country which appeared to them so unfavourable to human life. He came just in time to prevent the execution of this design. Alternately employing persuasion, threats, and even violence, he induced the majority to relinquish their intention; then turning the guns of the fort on the bark, on board which were the most determined, he compelled her to remain, or sink in the river.[17]

Upon arriving at that place, after being away for seven weeks, he found the colony had shrunk to thirty-eight people, who seemed set on leaving a country that appeared so unfavorable to human life. He arrived just in time to stop this plan. By using a mix of persuasion, threats, and even force, he convinced most of them to change their minds; then, turning the fort’s guns on the ship, which held the most resolute, he forced it to either stay or sink in the river.[17]

By a judicious regulation of intercourse with the Indians, over whom he had gained considerable influence, he restored plenty to the colony, and preserved it until the arrival of two vessels which had been dispatched from England under the command of captain Newport, with a supply of provisions and instruments of husbandry, and with a reinforcement of one hundred and twenty persons, composed of many gentlemen, several refiners, gold smiths, and jewellers, and a few labourers.

By carefully managing relationships with the Native Americans, whom he had gained significant influence over, he brought prosperity back to the colony and maintained it until the arrival of two ships sent from England under Captain Newport's command. These ships carried a supply of food, farming tools, and a reinforcement of one hundred and twenty people, including many gentlemen, several metalworkers, goldsmiths, jewelers, and a few laborers.

The influence of Smith disappeared with the danger which had produced it, and was succeeded by an improvident relaxation of discipline, productive of the most pernicious consequences.[18]

The influence of Smith faded away with the threat that caused it and was replaced by a careless loosening of discipline, leading to very harmful consequences.[18]

A glittering earth mistaken for gold dust.

About this time, a shining earth, mistaken by the colonists for gold dust, was found in a small stream of water near Jamestown. Their raging thirst for gold was re-excited by this incident. Smith, in his History of Virginia, describing the frenzy of the moment, says, "there was no thought, no discourse, no hope, and no work, but to dig gold, wash gold, refine gold, and load gold. And, notwithstanding captain Smith's warm and judicious representations how absurd it was to neglect other things of immediate use and necessity, to load such a drunken ship with gilded dust, yet was he overruled, and her returns were made in a parcel of glittering dirt, which is to be found in various parts of the country, and which they, very sanguinely, concluded to be gold dust."

About this time, the colonists discovered a shiny substance in a small stream near Jamestown, which they mistakenly thought was gold dust. This incident reignited their intense desire for gold. Smith, in his History of Virginia, describes the frenzy of the moment, saying, "there was no thought, no conversation, no hope, and no work, other than to dig for gold, wash gold, refine gold, and load gold. And despite Captain Smith's passionate and sensible warnings about how foolish it was to ignore other important necessities in favor of filling a drunken ship with glittering dust, he was overruled, and their shipment consisted of a load of shiny dirt, which they optimistically believed to be gold dust."

1608

The two vessels returned laden, one with this dirt, and the other with cedar. This is the first remittance ever made from America by an English colony.

The two ships came back loaded, one with this dirt and the other with cedar. This is the first shipment ever sent from America by an English colony.

The effects of this fatal delusion were soon felt, and the colony again began to suffer that distress, from scarcity of food, which had before brought it, more than once, to the brink of ruin.

The effects of this deadly illusion were quickly felt, and the colony began to experience that hardship from food shortages that had previously pushed it, more than once, to the edge of disaster.

Smith explores the Chesapeake.

The researches of the English settlers had not yet extended beyond the country adjacent to James river. Smith had formed the bold design of exploring the great bay of Chesapeake, examining the mighty rivers which empty into it, opening an intercourse with the nations inhabiting their borders, and acquiring a knowledge of the state of their cultivation and population. Accompanied by Doctor Russel, he engaged in this hardy enterprise in an open boat of about three tons burthen, and with a crew of thirteen men. On the 2d of June, he descended the river in company with the last of Newport's two vessels, and, parting with her at the capes, began his survey at cape Charles. With great fatigue and danger, he examined every river, inlet, and bay, on both sides of the Chesapeake, as far as the mouth of the Rappahannock. His provisions being exhausted, he returned, and arrived at Jamestown on the 21st of July. He found the colony in the utmost confusion and disorder. All those who came last with Newport were sick; the danger of famine was imminent; and the clamour against the president was loud, and universal. The seasonable arrival of Smith restrained their fury. The accounts he gave of his discoveries, and the hope he entertained that the waters of the Chesapeake communicated with the south sea,[19] extended their views and revived their spirits. They contented themselves with deposing their president, and, having in vain urged Smith to accept that office, elected his friend Mr. Scrivener as vice president.

The research by the English settlers had not yet gone beyond the area around the James River. Smith had boldly planned to explore the great Chesapeake Bay, checking out the major rivers flowing into it, establishing contact with the nations living along its borders, and learning about their farming practices and population. Accompanied by Dr. Russel, he set off on this daring mission in an open boat of about three tons capacity, with a crew of thirteen men. On June 2nd, he traveled down the river alongside the last of Newport's two vessels, parting ways at the capes and starting his survey at Cape Charles. Despite great fatigue and danger, he explored every river, inlet, and bay on both sides of the Chesapeake, all the way to the mouth of the Rappahannock. After running out of supplies, he returned and reached Jamestown on July 21st. He found the colony in complete chaos. Everyone who had come recently with Newport was sick; the threat of famine was real, and there was a loud, universal outcry against the president. Smith’s timely return calmed their anger. His accounts of his discoveries and his belief that the waters of the Chesapeake connected with the South Sea extended their perspectives and lifted their spirits. They decided to depose their president, and after unsuccessfully trying to convince Smith to take on that role, they elected his friend Mr. Scrivener as vice president.

After employing three days in making arrangements for obtaining regular supplies, and for the government of the colony, Smith again sailed with twelve men, to complete his researches into the countries on the Chesapeake.

After spending three days making plans to secure regular supplies and establish the colony's governance, Smith set sail again with twelve men to continue his explorations of the areas around the Chesapeake.

From this voyage he returned on the seventh of September; having advanced as far as the river Susquehannah, and visited all the countries on both shores of the bay. He entered most of the large creeks, sailed up many of the great rivers to their falls, and made accurate observations on the extensive territories through which he passed, and on the various tribes inhabiting them, with whom he, alternately, fought, negotiated, and traded. In every situation, he displayed judgment, courage, and that presence of mind which is essential to the character of a commander; and never failed, finally, to inspire the savages he encountered, with the most exalted opinion of himself and of his nation.

He returned from his voyage on September 7th, having traveled as far as the Susquehanna River and explored all the areas on both sides of the bay. He navigated most of the large creeks and sailed up many of the major rivers to their waterfalls, making detailed observations of the vast regions he passed through and the various tribes living there, with whom he fought, negotiated, and traded. In every situation, he showed judgment, courage, and the quick thinking that are essential for a leader, and he always left the Indigenous people he met with a high opinion of himself and his country.

When we consider that he sailed above three thousand miles in an open boat; when we contemplate the dangers and the hardships he encountered; when we reflect on the valuable additions he made to the stock of knowledge respecting America; we shall not hesitate to say that few voyages of discovery, undertaken at any time, reflect more honour on those engaged in them. "So full and exact," says Dr. Robertson, "are his accounts of that large portion of the American continent comprehended in the two provinces of Virginia and Maryland, that after the progress of information and research for a century and a half, his map exhibits no inaccurate view of both countries, and is the original, on which all subsequent delineations and descriptions have been formed."[20]

When we think about the fact that he traveled over three thousand miles in an open boat; when we consider the dangers and challenges he faced; when we reflect on the valuable contributions he made to our understanding of America; we can confidently say that few exploration journeys, at any time, bring more honor to those involved. "So detailed and accurate," says Dr. Robertson, "are his accounts of the large area of the American continent that covers the two provinces of Virginia and Maryland, that even after a century and a half of research and information advancement, his map remains a true representation of both countries and is the original basis for all later maps and descriptions."[20]

 

Old Brick Church

Old Brick Church

Ruins of the Old Brick Church Built at Jamestown in 1639

Remains of the Old Brick Church Built at Jamestown in 1639

Settled by the English in 1607, on the banks of the James River about 32 miles from its mouth, it was at Jamestown that the first legislative assembly in America was held in 1619, and here in the same year slavery was first introduced into the original thirteen colonies. The site of the settlement, which was originally a peninsula, but is now an island, is owned by the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities. Besides the ruins of the church shown here those of the fort and of two or three houses built more than a hundred years before the Declaration of Independence was signed are still standing.

Founded by the English in 1607 along the James River, about 32 miles from its mouth, Jamestown was the location of America's first legislative assembly in 1619, and it was also where slavery was first introduced to the original thirteen colonies in the same year. The settlement site, which used to be a peninsula and is now an island, is owned by the Association for the Preservation of Virginia Antiquities. In addition to the ruins of the church shown here, the remains of the fort and a couple of houses built more than a hundred years before the Declaration of Independence was signed are still intact.

 

Is chosen president.

On his return from this expedition, Smith was chosen president of the council; and, yielding to the general wish, accepted the office. Soon after, Newport arrived with an additional supply of settlers, among whom were the two first females who adventured to the present colony; but he came without provisions.

On his return from this expedition, Smith was elected president of the council; and, going along with the general wish, he accepted the position. Soon after, Newport arrived with more settlers, including the first two women who ventured to the current colony; however, he arrived without supplies.

The judicious administration of the president, however, supplied the wants of the colonists, and restrained the turbulent. Encouraged by his example, and coerced by his authority, a spirit of industry and subordination was created among them, which was the parent of plenty and of peace.[21]

The careful management of the president, however, met the needs of the colonists and kept the unruly in check. Inspired by his example and compelled by his authority, a sense of hard work and order emerged among them, leading to abundance and harmony.[21]

The company in England, though disappointed in the hope of discovering a passage to the Pacific, and of finding mines of the precious metals, still indulged in golden dreams of future wealth. To increase their funds, as well as their influence and reputation, by the acquisition of additional numbers, to explain and enlarge their powers and privileges, and to ensure a colonial government conforming to their own views and wishes, 1609New Charter.the company petitioned for a new charter, which was granted on the 23d of May. Some of the first nobility and gentry of the country, and most of the companies of London, with a numerous body of merchants and tradesmen, were added to the former adventurers, and they were all incorporated, by the name of "The treasurer and company of adventurers of the city of London, for the first colony in Virginia." To them were granted, in absolute property, the lands extending from Cape or Point Comfort, along the sea coast, two hundred miles to the northward, and from the same point, along the sea coast, two hundred miles to the southward, and up into the land, throughout, from sea to sea, west and north-west; and also all the islands lying within one hundred miles of the coast of both seas of the precinct aforesaid: to be holden as of the manor of East Greenwich, in free and common soccage, and paying, in lieu of all services, one-fifth of the gold and silver that should be found. The corporation was authorised to convey, under its common seal, particular portions of these lands to subjects or denizens, on such conditions as might promote the intentions of the grant. The powers of the president and council in Virginia were abrogated, and a new council in England was established, with power to the company to fill all vacancies therein by election. This council was empowered to appoint and remove all officers for the colony, and to make all ordinances for its government, not contrary to the laws of England; and to rule the colonists according to such ordinances. License was given to transport to Virginia, all persons willing to go thither, and to export merchandise free from customs for seven years. There was also granted, for twenty-one years, freedom from all subsidies in Virginia, and from all impositions on importations and exportations from or to any of the King's dominions, "except only the five pounds in the hundred due for customs." The colonists were declared to be entitled to the rights of natural subjects. The governor was empowered to establish martial law in case of rebellion or mutiny; and, to prevent the superstitions of the Church of Rome from taking root in the plantation, it was declared that none should pass into Virginia, but such as shall have first taken the oath of supremacy.[22]

The company in England, while disappointed that they couldn't find a passage to the Pacific or discover precious metal mines, still dreamed of future wealth. To boost their funds, influence, and reputation by attracting more members, to clarify and expand their rights and privileges, and to ensure a colonial government aligned with their views, 1609New Charter. they petitioned for a new charter, which was granted on May 23rd. Some of the leading nobles and gentry of the country, along with most of the companies in London and a large group of merchants and tradespeople, joined the original adventurers, and they were all incorporated under the name "The Treasurer and Company of Adventurers of the City of London, for the First Colony in Virginia." They were granted complete ownership of the lands extending from Cape or Point Comfort, along the coastline, two hundred miles northward, and from the same point, along the coast, two hundred miles southward, and inland, all the way across from sea to sea, west and northwest; along with all the islands within one hundred miles of the shore of both seas in that area. These lands were to be held as of the manor of East Greenwich, in free and common soccage, and in exchange for all services, they would pay one-fifth of any gold and silver found. The corporation was authorized to transfer specific portions of these lands to individuals or residents under conditions that would further the goals of the grant. The powers of the president and council in Virginia were removed, and a new council in England was set up, allowing the company to fill any vacancies through elections. This council was granted the authority to appoint and remove all officers for the colony, and to create all regulations for its governance, as long as they didn't conflict with English law; and to manage the colonists according to those regulations. Permission was granted to transport anyone willing to go to Virginia, and to export goods without customs duties for seven years. They also received a twenty-one year exemption from all taxes in Virginia, and from any fees on imports and exports to or from any of the King's territories, "except only the five pounds in the hundred due for customs." The colonists were recognized as having the rights of natural subjects. The governor was given the power to impose martial law in cases of rebellion or mutiny; and to prevent the influence of the Roman Catholic Church in the colony, it was declared that only those who had first taken the oath of supremacy could enter Virginia.[22]

The company, being thus enlarged, and enabled to take more effective measures for the settlement of the country, soon fitted out nine ships, with five hundred emigrants. Lord Delawar was constituted governor and captain-general for life; and several other offices were created. Third voyage of Newport.The direction of the expedition was again given to Newport; to whom, and Sir Thomas Gates, and Sir George Somers, powers were severally granted to supersede the existing administration, and to govern the colony until the arrival of Lord Delawar. With singular indiscretion, the council omitted to establish precedence among these gentlemen; who, being totally unable to settle this important point among themselves, agreed to embark on board the same vessel, and to be companions during the voyage. They were parted from the rest of the fleet in a storm, and driven on Bermudas; having on board one hundred and fifty men, a great portion of the provisions destined for the colony, and the new commission and instructions of the council. The residue of the squadron arrived safely in Virginia.

The company, having expanded, was able to take more effective measures for settling the country and soon outfitted nine ships with five hundred emigrants. Lord Delawar was appointed governor and captain-general for life, and several other positions were created. Newport's third voyage. The direction of the expedition was again given to Newport, who, along with Sir Thomas Gates and Sir George Somers, was granted the power to replace the existing administration and govern the colony until Lord Delawar arrived. In a surprising oversight, the council failed to establish a hierarchy among these gentlemen, who couldn't agree on this important issue themselves and decided to travel on the same ship as companions during the journey. They got separated from the rest of the fleet in a storm and were led to Bermuda, with one hundred and fifty men on board, a large portion of the supplies meant for the colony, and the new commission and instructions from the council. The rest of the squadron arrived safely in Virginia.

"A great part of the new company," says Mr. Stith, "consisted of unruly sparks, packed off by their friends to escape worse destinies at home. And the rest were chiefly made up of poor gentlemen, broken tradesmen, rakes and libertines, footmen, and such others as were much fitter to spoil and ruin a Commonwealth, than to help to raise or maintain one. This lewd company, therefore, were led by their seditious captains into many mischiefs and extravagancies. They assumed to themselves the power of disposing of the government, and conferred it sometimes on one, and sometimes on another. To-day the old commission must rule, to-morrow the new, and next day neither. So that all was anarchy and distraction."

"A big part of the new company," says Mr. Stith, "was made up of rebellious young people sent away by their friends to escape worse fates back home. The rest were mainly struggling gentlemen, broken tradesmen, rakes and libertines, footmen, and others who were far more likely to damage and ruin a community than to help build or sustain one. This rowdy group, therefore, was led by their rebellious leaders into various troubles and excesses. They took it upon themselves to control the government, handing it off to one person at times and then another at other times. Today the old commissioners have power, tomorrow the new ones do, and the next day neither do. Everything was chaos and confusion."

The judgment of Smith was not long suspended. With the promptness and decision which belong to vigorous minds, he determined that his own authority was not legally revoked until the arrival of the new commission, and therefore resolved to continue its exercise. Incapable of holding the reins of government with a feeble hand, he exhibited, on this emergency, that energy and good sense which never deserted him when the occasion required them. After imprisoning the chief promoters of sedition, and thereby restoring regularity and obedience, he, for the double purpose of extending the colony, and of preventing the mischiefs to be apprehended from so many turbulent spirits collected in Jamestown, detached one hundred men to the falls of James river, under the command of West, and the same number to Nansemond, under that of Martin. These persons conducted their settlements with so little judgment, that they soon converted all the neighbouring Indians into enemies. After losing several parties, they found themselves in absolute need of the support and direction of Smith. These were readily afforded, until a melancholy accident deprived the colony of the aid of a man whose talents had, more than once, rescued it from that desperate condition into which folly and vice had plunged it. Returning from a visit to the detachment stationed at the falls of James river, his powder bag took fire, while he was sleeping in the boat, and, in the explosion, he was so severely wounded as to be confined to his bed. Smith returns to England.Being unable to obtain the aid of a surgeon in the colony, he embarked for England about the beginning of October.

Smith's judgment was quickly made. With the promptness and decisiveness that come from a strong mind, he decided that his authority wasn’t legally canceled until the new commission arrived, so he chose to keep using it. Unable to manage the government weakly, he showed the energy and good sense that never left him when they were needed. After jailing the main instigators of unrest and restoring order, he sent one hundred men to the falls of the James River under West's command, and another hundred to Nansemond under Martin's command, aiming to expand the colony and prevent problems from so many restless individuals gathered in Jamestown. Unfortunately, these groups managed their settlements so poorly that they quickly turned all the nearby Indians into enemies. After losing several groups, they found themselves in dire need of Smith’s support and leadership. He readily provided help until a tragic accident left the colony without the assistance of a man whose skills had rescued it more than once from the desperate situations caused by foolishness and wrongdoing. On his way back from visiting the group at the falls of James River, his powder bag caught fire while he was sleeping in the boat, and the explosion injured him severely enough to keep him in bed. Smith is back in England. Unable to find a surgeon in the colony, he set sail for England at the beginning of October.

State of the colony.

At his departure, the colony consisted of about five hundred inhabitants. They were furnished with three ships, seven boats, commodities ready for trade, ten weeks' provision in the public stores, six mares and a horse, a large stock of hogs and poultry, some sheep and goats, utensils for agriculture, nets for fishing, one hundred trained and expert soldiers well acquainted with the Indians, their language and habitations, twenty-four pieces of ordnance, and three hundred muskets, with a sufficient quantity of arms and ammunition.[23]

At his departure, the colony had about five hundred residents. They were equipped with three ships, seven boats, trade goods, ten weeks’ worth of supplies in public storage, six mares and a horse, a large number of pigs and chickens, some sheep and goats, farming tools, fishing nets, one hundred trained and skilled soldiers who were familiar with the Native Americans, their language, and their settlements, twenty-four pieces of artillery, and three hundred muskets, along with enough weapons and ammunition. [23]

The fair prospects of the colony were soon blasted by a course of folly and crime, of riot and insubordination.

The promising future of the colony was quickly ruined by a series of mistakes and wrongdoing, chaos and rebellion.

Numerous pretenders advanced their claims to the supreme command. The choice at length fell upon captain Percy, who derived much consideration from his virtues, as well as from his illustrious family; but his talents, at no time equal to this new and difficult station, were rendered still less competent to the task, by a long course of ill health. Being generally confined by sickness to his bed, he was incapable of maintaining his authority; and total confusion ensued, with its accustomed baneful consequences.

Numerous claimants put forward their bids for the top position. In the end, the decision was made to choose Captain Percy, who gained considerable respect due to his good qualities and his prominent family background. However, his skills, never fully suited for this new and challenging role, were made even less capable by a prolonged period of illness. As he was often bedridden due to his sickness, he couldn't assert his authority effectively, leading to complete chaos and the usual negative outcomes that followed.

The Indians, no longer awed by the genius and vigour of Smith, attacked the colony on all sides. West and Martin, after losing their boats and nearly half their men, were driven into Jamestown. The stock of provisions was lavishly wasted; and famine added its desolating scourge to their other calamities. After devouring the skins of their horses, and the Indians they had killed, the survivors fed on those of their companions who had sunk under such accumulated misery. The recollection of these tremendous sufferings was long retained, and, for many years, this period was distinguished by the name of THE STARVING TIME.[24]

The Native Americans, no longer impressed by Smith's skill and energy, attacked the colony from all directions. West and Martin, after losing their boats and nearly half their men, were forced into Jamestown. The food supply was recklessly wasted, and starvation added to their other troubles. After eating the skins of their horses and the Natives they had killed, the survivors resorted to cannibalism, consuming the bodies of their companions who had succumbed to such overwhelming misery. The memory of these horrific hardships lingered for a long time, and for many years, this period was referred to as THE STARVING TIME.[24]

1610

In six months, the colony was reduced, by these distresses, to sixty persons, who could not have survived ten days longer, when they were relieved from this state of despair by the arrival of Sir Thomas Gates, Sir George Somers, and Captain Newport, from Bermuda.

In six months, the colony was brought down to sixty people due to these hardships, who would not have lasted ten more days when they were rescued from this despair by the arrival of Sir Thomas Gates, Sir George Somers, and Captain Newport from Bermuda.

They abandon the country.

The determination to abandon the country was immediately taken, and the wretched remnant of the colony embarked on board the vessels, and sailed for England. "None dropped a tear," says Mr. Chalmer, "because none had enjoyed one day of happiness."

The decision to leave the country was made right away, and the miserable survivors of the colony boarded the ships and set sail for England. "No one shed a tear," says Mr. Chalmer, "because nobody had experienced a single happy day."

Stopped by Lord Delawar.

Fortunately, they met Lord Delawar, who prevailed on them to return; and, on the 10th of June, resettled them at Jamestown.

Fortunately, they encountered Lord Delawar, who convinced them to go back; and, on June 10th, he helped them settle again in Jamestown.

By mildness of temper, attention to business, and judicious exercise of authority, this nobleman restored order and contentment to the colony, and again impressed the Indians with respect for the English name. 1611Unfortunately, ill health obliged him to resign the government which he placed in the hands of Mr. Percy, and sailed for the West Indies, leaving in the colony about two hundred persons in possession of the blessings of health, plenty, and peace.

By being calm, focused on his duties, and wisely using his authority, this nobleman brought order and happiness back to the colony, and once again made the Indians respect the English. 1611Unfortunately, due to poor health, he had to step down from leadership, handing over the reins to Mr. Percy, and he sailed to the West Indies, leaving around two hundred people in the colony enjoying good health, abundance, and peace.

Sir Thomas Dale.

On the 10th of May, Sir Thomas Dale, who had been appointed to the government, arrived with a fresh supply of men and provisions, and found the colony relapsing into a state of anarchy, idleness, and want. It required all the authority of the new governor to maintain public order, and to compel the idle and the dissolute to labour. Some conspiracies having been detected, he proclaimed martial law, which was immediately put in execution. This severity was then deemed necessary, and is supposed to have saved the settlement.[25]

On May 10th, Sir Thomas Dale, who had been appointed to govern, arrived with a new group of men and supplies and found the colony slipping back into chaos, laziness, and need. It took all of the new governor's authority to keep public order and force the idle and unruly to work. After uncovering some conspiracies, he declared martial law, which was quickly enforced. This strictness was considered necessary and is believed to have saved the settlement.[25]

In the beginning of August, Sir Thomas Gates, who had been appointed to succeed Sir Thomas Dale, arrived with six ships, and a considerable supply of men and provisions. After receiving this addition to its numbers, the colony again extended itself up James river; and several new settlements were made.

In early August, Sir Thomas Gates, who was chosen to take over from Sir Thomas Dale, arrived with six ships and a good supply of people and supplies. After this increase in their numbers, the colony expanded further up the James River, leading to several new settlements.

Extravagant accounts of the fertility of Bermuda having reached England, the company became desirous of obtaining it as a place from which Virginia might be supplied with provisions. Application was therefore made to the crown for a new patent, to comprehend this island; 1612New Charter.and, in March, a charter was issued, granting to the treasurer and company all the islands situate in the ocean within three hundred leagues of the coast of Virginia. By this charter, the corporation was essentially new modelled. It was ordained that four general courts of the adventurers should be holden annually, for the determination of affairs of importance, and weekly meetings were directed, for the transaction of common business. To promote the effectual settlement of the plantation, license was given to open lotteries in any part of England.[26]

After hearing extravagant reports about Bermuda's fertility, the company wanted to secure it as a source of provisions for Virginia. They applied to the crown for a new patent to include this island; 1612New Charter. In March, a charter was granted, giving the treasurer and company all the islands located within three hundred leagues of the Virginia coast. This charter effectively restructured the corporation. It required that four general meetings of the investors be held each year to handle important matters, and weekly meetings were scheduled for routine business. To encourage the successful establishment of the settlement, they were given permission to hold lotteries anywhere in England.[26]

These lotteries, which were the first ever drawn in England, brought twenty-nine thousand pounds into the treasury of the company. When they were discontinued, in 1620, on the complaint of the House of Commons, they were declared to have "supplied the real food by which Virginia had been nourished."

These lotteries, which were the first ever held in England, brought in twenty-nine thousand pounds for the company's treasury. When they were stopped in 1620 due to a complaint from the House of Commons, they were said to have "provided the essential support that nourished Virginia."

About this time an event took place which was followed by important consequences to the colony. Provisions in Jamestown continuing to be scarce, and supplies from the neighbouring Indians, with whom the English were often at war, being necessarily uncertain, captain Argal, with two vessels, was sent round to the Potowmac for a cargo of corn. While obtaining the cargo, he understood that Pocahontas, who had remained steadfast in her attachment to the English, had absented herself from the home of her father, and lay concealed in the neighbourhood. Captain Argal seizes Pocahontas.By bribing some of those in whom she confided Argal prevailed on her to come on board his vessel, where she was detained respectfully, and brought to Jamestown. He was induced to take this step by the hope that the possession of Pocahontas would give the English an ascendancy over her father, who was known to dote on her. In this, however, he was disappointed. Powhatan offered corn and friendship, if they would first restore his daughter, but, with a loftiness of spirit which claims respect, rejected every proposition for conciliation which should not be preceded by that act of reparation.

Around this time, an event occurred that had significant consequences for the colony. With food supplies in Jamestown running low and resources from nearby tribes, who were frequently in conflict with the English, being unreliable, Captain Argal was sent with two ships to the Potomac River to collect corn. While he was securing the cargo, he learned that Pocahontas, who had remained loyal to the English, had left her father's home and was hiding in the area. Captain Argal captures Pocahontas. By bribing a few people she trusted, Argal convinced her to come aboard his ship, where she was treated with respect and taken to Jamestown. He made this move hoping that having Pocahontas would give the English leverage over her father, who was known to care deeply for her. However, he was disappointed. Powhatan offered corn and friendship if they would first return his daughter, but with a dignity that demanded respect, he rejected any conciliatory proposals that did not begin with that act of restitution.

During her detention at Jamestown, she made an impression on the heart of Mr. Rolf, a young gentleman of estimation in the colony, who succeeded in gaining her affections. They were married with the consent of Powhatan, who was entirely reconciled to the English by that event, and continued, ever after, to be their sincere friend. This connexion led also to a treaty with the Chiccahominies, a brave and daring tribe, who submitted themselves to the English, and became their tributaries.[27]

During her time in captivity at Jamestown, she caught the attention of Mr. Rolf, a respected young man in the colony, who managed to win her love. They got married with Powhatan's approval, who was fully reconciled to the English because of this marriage, and he remained their true friend from that point on. This relationship also resulted in a treaty with the Chiccahominies, a brave and bold tribe, who agreed to submit to the English and became their tributaries.[27]

1613

About the same time, an important change took place in the internal arrangements of the colony.

About the same time, a significant change occurred in the internal organization of the colony.

Heretofore no separate property in lands had been acquired, and no individual had laboured for himself. The lands had been held, cleared, and cultivated in common, and their produce carried into a common granary, from which it was distributed to all. This system was to be ascribed, in some measure, to the unwise injunction contained in the royal instructions, directing the colonists to trade together for five years in one common stock. Its effect was such as ought to have been foreseen. Industry, deprived of its due reward, exclusive property in the produce of its toil, felt no sufficient stimulus to exertion, and the public supplies were generally inadequate to the public necessities. Separate property in lands.To remove this cause of perpetual scarcity, Sir Thomas Dale divided a considerable portion of land into lots of three acres, and granted one of them, in full property, to each individual. Although the colonists were still required to devote a large portion of labour to the public, a sudden change was made in their appearance and habits. Industry, impelled by the certainty of recompense, advanced with rapid strides; and the inhabitants were no longer in fear of wanting bread, either for themselves, or for the emigrants from England.[28]

Until now, no separate ownership of land had been established, and no one had worked for their own benefit. The land was held, cleared, and farmed collectively, with the harvest stored in a shared granary that provided for everyone. This system can be partly attributed to the misguided rule in the royal instructions, which told the colonists to trade together in a common pool for five years. The outcome was predictable. Without the proper reward or personal ownership of the fruits of their labor, people lacked the motivation to work hard, leading to public supplies that were often insufficient for general needs. Separate land ownership.To alleviate this ongoing shortage, Sir Thomas Dale divided a large section of land into three-acre plots and granted full ownership of one to each individual. Although the colonists still had to dedicate a significant amount of labor to public projects, their appearance and lifestyles changed dramatically. Driven by the promise of reward, productivity surged, and the residents no longer feared being short of food for themselves or the immigrants from England.[28]

1614

Early in the following year, Sir Thomas Gates returned to England, leaving the government again with Sir Thomas Dale. This gentleman detached captain Argal on an enterprise of which no immediate notice was taken, but which was afterwards recollected with indignation.

Early in the following year, Sir Thomas Gates went back to England, leaving the government once again with Sir Thomas Dale. This man sent Captain Argal on a mission that didn’t get much attention at first, but was later recalled with anger.

The French, who had directed their course to the more northern parts of the continent, had been among the first adventurers to North America. Their voyages of discovery are of a very early date, and their attempts to establish a colony were among the first which were made. After several abortive efforts, a permanent settlement was made in Canada, in the year 1604, and the foundation of Quebec was laid in the year 1608. In November 1603, Henry IV. appointed De Mont lieutenant-general of that part of the territory which he claimed, lying in North America, between the 40th and 46th degrees of north latitude, then called Acadié, with power to colonise and to rule it; and he soon afterwards granted to the same gentleman and his associates, an exclusive right to the commerce of peltry in Acadié and the gulf of St. Lawrence. In consequence of these grants, a settlement was formed in the subsequent year, on that coast, near the river St. Croix; and in 1605, Port Royal was built on a more northern part of the bay of Fundy.

The French, who had headed toward the northern parts of the continent, were among the first explorers of North America. Their voyages of discovery date back quite early, and their attempts to establish a colony were among the first made. After several failed efforts, a permanent settlement was established in Canada in 1604, and the foundation of Quebec was laid in 1608. In November 1603, Henry IV appointed De Mont as lieutenant-general of the area he claimed in North America, between the 40th and 46th degrees of north latitude, then called Acadié, giving him the authority to colonize and govern it; shortly after, he granted De Mont and his associates exclusive rights to the fur trade in Acadié and the Gulf of St. Lawrence. As a result of these grants, a settlement was formed the following year on the coast near the St. Croix River, and in 1605, Port Royal was constructed on a more northern part of the Bay of Fundy.

The colony, receiving not much support from France, was feeble and unprosperous, but retained quiet possession of the country. In a time of profound peace, the expedition of Argal was directed against it. He found it totally unprepared for defence. The inhabitants, who had assiduously and successfully cultivated the friendship of the Indians, were scattered abroad in the woods, engaged in their several pursuits; and a ship and bark just arrived from France, laden with articles necessary for the use of the colony, were surprised in port, and their cargoes taken to Jamestown. After the departure of Argal, the French resumed their former station.

The colony, receiving little support from France, was weak and struggling but still kept control of the land. During a time of complete peace, Argal's expedition was launched against it. He found it completely defenseless. The residents, who had diligently maintained good relations with the Indians, were spread out in the woods, busy with their various activities; a ship and a small boat that had just arrived from France, loaded with supplies needed for the colony, were caught off guard in port, and their cargoes were taken to Jamestown. After Argal left, the French went back to their previous position.

The pretext for this predatory expedition was, that the French, by settling in Acadié, had invaded the rights of the English, acquired by the first discovery of the continent.

The excuse for this aggressive expedition was that the French, by settling in Acadié, had violated the rights of the English, established by the continent's initial discovery.

Argal also paid a visit to New York, then in possession of the Dutch; which country he claimed under the pretext that captain Hudson was an Englishman, and could not transfer the benefit of his discoveries from his sovereign. He demanded possession of the place; and the Dutch governor, being unable to resist, "peaceably submitted both himself and his colony to the King of England, and the governor of Virginia under him," and consented to pay a tribute. Argal then continued his voyage to Jamestown. But another governor soon afterwards arriving from Amsterdam with better means of asserting the title of his nation, the payment of the tribute was refused, and the place put in a state of defence.[29]

Argal also visited New York, which was then under Dutch control; he claimed it by arguing that Captain Hudson was English and couldn't pass on the benefits of his discoveries from his king. He requested control of the area, and the Dutch governor, unable to resist, "peacefully submitted both himself and his colony to the King of England, and the governor of Virginia under him," and agreed to pay a tribute. Argal then continued his journey to Jamestown. However, another governor soon arrived from Amsterdam with better resources to assert his nation's claim, leading to the refusal of the tribute payment and the area being fortified.[29]

Fifty acres of land laid off for each settler.

The advantages resulting to the colony from allowing each individual to labour, in part for himself, having soon become apparent, the system of working in common to fill the public stores, seems to have been totally relinquished; and, not long afterwards, fifty acres of land, promised by the rules of the company to each emigrant, were surveyed and delivered to those having the title.

The benefits that the colony gained from letting each person work partly for themselves quickly became clear, so the system of working together to stock the communal supplies was completely dropped. Shortly after that, fifty acres of land, which the company's rules promised to each immigrant, were surveyed and given to those who held the title.

1615
Tobacco.

About the same time, tobacco was first cultivated in Virginia.

About the same time, tobacco was first grown in Virginia.

This plant, although detested by the King, who even wrote a pamphlet against it, which he styled a counter blast; although discountenanced by the leading members of parliament, and even by the company, who issued edicts against its cultivation; although extremely unpleasant to persons not accustomed to it, and disagreeable in its effects, surmounted all opposition, and has, by an unaccountable caprice, been brought into general use, and become one of the most considerable staples of America.[30]

This plant, even though the King hated it and even wrote a pamphlet against it, which he called a counter blast; despite being frowned upon by leading members of parliament and even the company that issued rules against growing it; and although it’s really unpleasant for people who aren’t used to it and has disagreeable effects, managed to overcome all resistance. In an inexplicable twist, it has become widely used and has turned into one of the most significant staples in America.[30]

1616
Yeardly.

In the spring of the following year, Sir Thomas Dale sailed for England, leaving the government in the hands of Mr. George Yeardly, who, after a lax administration of one year, was succeeded by captain Argal.

In the spring of the next year, Sir Thomas Dale set sail for England, handing over the government to Mr. George Yeardly, who, after a relaxed administration of one year, was replaced by Captain Argal.

1617
Argal.

Argal was a man of talents and energy, but selfish, haughty, and tyrannical. He continued martial law during a season of peace; and a Mr. Brewster, who was tried under this arbitrary system, for contemptuous words spoken of the governor, was sentenced to suffer death. He obtained with difficulty an appeal to the treasurer and company in England, by whom the sentence was reversed.[31]

Argal was a man full of talent and energy, but he was also selfish, arrogant, and oppressive. He enforced martial law even in times of peace. Mr. Brewster, who was put on trial under this harsh system for some disrespectful remarks about the governor, was sentenced to death. With a lot of effort, he managed to appeal to the treasurer and the company in England, who overturned the sentence.[31]

While martial law was, according to Stith, the common law of the land, the governor seems to have been the sole legislator. His general edicts mark the severity of his rule. He ordered that merchandise should be sold at an advance of twenty-five per centum, and tobacco taken in payment at the rate of three shillings per pound, under the penalty of three years' servitude to the company; that no person should traffic privately with the Indians, or teach them the use of fire arms, under pain of death; that no person should hunt deer or hogs without the governor's permission; that no man should shoot, unless in his own necessary defence, until a new supply of ammunition should arrive, on pain of a year's personal service; that none should go on board the ships at Jamestown, without the governor's leave; that every person should go to church on Sundays and holidays, under the penalty of slavery during the following week for the first offence, during a month for the second, and during a year and a day for the third. The rigour of this administration necessarily exciting much discontent, the complaints of the Virginians at length made their way to the company. Mr. Yeardly.Lord Delawar being dead, Mr. Yeardly was appointed captain-general, with instructions to examine the wrongs of the colonists, and to redress them.[32]

While martial law was, according to Stith, the law of the land, the governor seemed to be the only one making the rules. His general orders highlighted how strict his rule was. He mandated that merchandise should be sold at a twenty-five percent markup, and tobacco should be accepted as payment at three shillings per pound, with a penalty of three years' servitude to the company for non-compliance; that no one should trade privately with the Indians or teach them how to use firearms, under the threat of death; that nobody could hunt deer or pigs without the governor's permission; that no one could shoot unless it was for their own self-defense until new ammunition arrived, risking a year's personal service for violations; that no one could board the ships at Jamestown without the governor's approval; and that everyone had to attend church on Sundays and holidays, facing slavery for the following week for the first offense, a month for the second, and a year and a day for the third. This harsh administration inevitably caused widespread discontent, and the complaints from the Virginians eventually reached the company. Mr. Yeardley. After Lord Delawar's death, Mr. Yeardly was appointed captain-general, with instructions to look into the grievances of the colonists and address them.[32]

1619

The new governor arrived in April, and soon after, to the inexpressible joy of the inhabitants, declared his determination to convoke a colonial assembly.

The new governor arrived in April, and shortly after, to the overwhelming delight of the residents, announced his decision to call a colonial assembly.

This is an important era in the history of Virginia. Heretofore, all legislative authority had been exercised, either by the corporation in England, or by their officers in the colony. The people had no voice, either personally, or by their representatives, in the government of themselves; and their most important concerns were managed by persons often unacquainted with their situation, and always possessing interests different from theirs. They now felicitated themselves on having really the privileges of Englishmen.

This is an important time in the history of Virginia. Until now, all legislative power had been held either by the corporation in England or by their officials in the colony. The people had no say, either directly or through their representatives, in governing themselves; their most significant issues were handled by people who were often unfamiliar with their circumstances and always had different interests than theirs. They now celebrated having the actual privileges of English citizens.

First colonial assembly.

This first assembly met at Jamestown on the 19th of June. The colony being not then divided into counties, the members were elected by the different boroughs, amounting at that time to seven. From this circumstance the popular branch of the legislature received the appellation of the house of burgesses, which it retained until all connexion with England was dissolved.

This first assembly gathered in Jamestown on June 19. Since the colony wasn't divided into counties yet, the members were elected by the different boroughs, which numbered seven at that time. Because of this, the popular branch of the legislature was called the House of Burgesses, a name it kept until all ties with England were severed.

The assembly, composed of the governor, the council, and burgesses, met together in one apartment, and there discussed the various matters which came before them. The laws then enacted, which, it is believed, are no longer extant, were transmitted to England for the approbation of the treasurer and company.[33]

The assembly, made up of the governor, the council, and the representatives, gathered in one room to discuss the different issues that were brought to them. The laws they passed, which are thought to no longer exist, were sent to England for approval from the treasurer and the company.[33]

Although the emigrations from England continued to be considerable, few females had crossed the Atlantic. Men without wives could not consider their residence in the country as permanent, and must intend after amassing some wealth, to return to their native land. To remove this impediment to the population of the colony, First arrival of females,1620ninety girls, of humble fortune and spotless character, were transported by the company to Virginia; and in the subsequent year, they were followed by sixty of the same description. They were received by the young planters as a blessing which substituted domestic happiness for the cheerless gloom of solitude; and the face of the country was essentially changed.[34] The prospect of becoming parents was accompanied with the anxieties for the welfare of their children; and the education of youth soon became an object of attention. The necessity of seminaries of learning was felt, and several steps were taken towards founding the college, afterwards established by William and Mary.

Although many people continued to emigrate from England, few women made the journey across the Atlantic. Men without wives couldn’t view their stay in the country as permanent; they likely planned to return to their homeland after accumulating some wealth. To address this challenge to the colony's population, First arrival of women,1620ninety girls, from humble backgrounds and of good character, were brought by the company to Virginia; the following year, sixty more of the same kind arrived. The young planters welcomed them as a blessing that replaced the lonely gloom of solitude with domestic happiness, significantly transforming the landscape of the country.[34] The idea of becoming parents came with concerns for their children's well-being, and educating the youth quickly became a priority. The need for educational institutions was recognized, and several steps were taken to establish the college later founded by William and Mary.

and of convicts.

About the same time the company received orders from the King to convey to Virginia one hundred idle and dissolute persons, then in custody of the knight marshal. These were the first convicts transported to America. The policy which dictated this measure was soon perceived to be not less wise than it was humane. Men who, in Europe, were the pests of the body politic, made an acceptable addition to the stock of labour in the colony; and, in a new world, where the temptations to crime seldom presented themselves, many of them became useful members of society.

About the same time, the company received orders from the King to send one hundred idle and troublesome people, who were in the custody of the knight marshal, to Virginia. These were the first convicts transported to America. The policy behind this decision quickly proved to be as smart as it was compassionate. Individuals who were problems in Europe became a valuable addition to the labor force in the colony; and in a new world, where the temptations to commit crimes were rare, many of them became productive members of society.

Heretofore the commerce of Virginia had been engrossed by the corporation. In the year 1620, this distressing and unprofitable monopoly was given up, and the trade was open to all. The free competition produced by this change of system was of essential advantage to the colony, 1621African slaves.but was the immediate cause of introducing a species of population which has had vast influence on the past, and may affect the future destinies of America, to an extent which human wisdom can neither foresee nor control. A Dutch vessel, availing itself of this commercial liberty, brought into James river twenty Africans, who were immediately purchased as slaves.[35]

Until now, Virginia's commerce had been controlled by the corporation. In 1620, this problematic and unprofitable monopoly was abandoned, and trade was opened to everyone. The free competition resulting from this change was a significant advantage for the colony, 1621Black enslaved people. but it also led to the introduction of a population that has had a huge impact on the past and could influence the future of America in ways that human wisdom cannot predict or manage. A Dutch ship, taking advantage of this newfound commercial freedom, brought twenty Africans into the James River, who were immediately sold as slaves.[35]

Two councils established.

In July, the company passed an ordinance establishing a frame of government for the colony. This instrument provided that there should be two supreme councils in Virginia, the one to be called the Council of State, to be appointed and displaced by the treasurer and company, and to assist the governor with advice on executive subjects; the other to be denominated the General Assembly, and to consist of the governor, the council of state, and burgesses; to be chosen for the present, by the inhabitants of every town, hundred, or settlement, in the colony, two for each. The assembly was empowered to enact general laws for the government of the colony, reserving a negative to the governor. Its acts were not to be in force until confirmed by the general court in England, and the ratification returned under its seal. On the other hand, no order of the general court was to bind the colony until assented to by the assembly.

In July, the company passed a law to set up a government structure for the colony. This law stated that there would be two main councils in Virginia: one called the Council of State, which would be appointed and removed by the treasurer and company, and would help the governor with executive matters; the other called the General Assembly, made up of the governor, the Council of State, and representatives (burgesses) chosen by the residents of each town, hundred, or settlement in the colony, with two representatives from each. The assembly could create general laws for governing the colony, but the governor had the power to veto them. However, these laws wouldn’t take effect until they were approved by the general court in England, and the confirmation was sent back with its seal. Conversely, no order from the general court would apply to the colony unless it was approved by the assembly.

1622

A controversy concerning the importation of tobacco into the European dominions of the crown, which had for some time existed between the King and the company, was, at length, adjusted.

A dispute over the importation of tobacco into the European territories of the crown, which had existed for some time between the King and the company, was finally resolved.

The King had demanded high duties on that article, while he permitted its importation from the dominions of Spain, and also restrained its direct exportation from Virginia, to the warehouses of the company in Holland, to which expedient his exactions had driven them. It was at length agreed that they should enjoy the sole right of importing that commodity into the kingdom, for which they should pay a duty of nine pence per pound, in lieu of all charges, and that the whole production of the colony should be brought to England.

The King had imposed high taxes on that product, while allowing its import from Spain, and also limited its direct export from Virginia to the company's warehouses in Holland, which is what had forced them into this situation. Eventually, it was agreed that they would have the exclusive right to import that commodity into the kingdom, for which they would pay a tax of nine pence per pound, covering all costs, and that all of the colony's production would be sent to England.

The industry, population, and produce of the colony, were now greatly increased. At peace with the Indians, they had extended their settlements to the Rappahannock and to the Potowmac. This change of circumstances having rendered it inconvenient to bring all causes to Jamestown before the governor and council, who had heretofore exercised all judicial power in the country, County courts.inferior courts were established, to sit in convenient places, in order to render justice more cheap and accessible to the people. Thus originated the county courts of Virginia.

The industry, population, and agriculture of the colony had greatly increased. At peace with the Native Americans, they had expanded their settlements to the Rappahannock and Potomac rivers. This change in circumstances made it impractical to bring every case to Jamestown before the governor and council, who previously held all judicial authority in the area, County courts. So, inferior courts were set up to meet in convenient locations to make justice more affordable and accessible to the people. This is how the county courts of Virginia came to be.

In this year the cup of prosperity, which the colonists had begun to taste, was dashed from their lips by an event which shook the colony to its foundation. In 1618, Powhatan died, and was succeeded, in his dominions and in his influence over all the neighbouring tribes, by Opechancanough, a bold and cunning chief, as remarkable for his jealousy and hatred of the new settlers, as for his qualifications to execute the designs suggested by his resentments. He renewed, however, the stipulations of Powhatan; and, for a considerable time, the general peace remained undisturbed. The colonists, unsuspicious of danger, observed neither the Indians nor their machinations. Engaged entirely in the pursuits of agriculture, they neglected their military exercises, and every useful precaution. Meanwhile, the Indians, being often employed as hunters, were furnished with fire arms, and taught to use them. They were admitted, at all times, freely into the habitations of the English, as harmless visitants, were fed at their tables, and lodged in their chambers. Indian conspiracy to massacre all the whites.During this state of friendly intercourse, the plan of a general massacre, which should involve man, woman, and child, in indiscriminate slaughter, was formed with cold and unrelenting deliberation. The tribes in the neighbourhood of the English, except those on the eastern shore of the Chesapeak, who were not trusted with the plan, were successively gained over; and, notwithstanding the perpetual intercourse between them and the white people, the most impenetrable secrecy was observed. So deep and dark was their dissimulation, that they were accustomed to borrow boats from the English to cross the river, in order to concert and mature their execrable designs.

In this year, the prosperity that the colonists had started to enjoy was abruptly taken away by an event that shook the colony to its core. In 1618, Powhatan died, and Opechancanough, a clever and fierce chief known for his jealousy and hatred of the new settlers, took over his realm and influence over the neighboring tribes. He did, however, continue the agreements made by Powhatan, and for a long time, peace remained undisturbed. The colonists, unaware of any danger, paid no attention to the Indians or their schemes. Fully focused on farming, they ignored military training and any safety measures. Meanwhile, the Indians, often acting as hunters, were given firearms and taught how to use them. They were welcomed into the English homes as harmless visitors, fed at their tables, and given shelter in their rooms. Indian plot to wipe out all the white people.During this time of friendly interaction, a plan for a widespread massacre that would include men, women, and children in indiscriminate slaughter was created with cold and calculated intent. The tribes near the English, except for those on the eastern shore of the Chesapeake, who were not included in the plan, were gradually won over; and despite constant contact with the white people, they kept their secret hidden. So deep and dark was their deceit that they often borrowed boats from the English to cross the river to discuss and develop their vile plans.

The 22d of March was designated as the day on which all the English settlements were to be attacked. The better to disguise their intentions, and to ensure success, they brought, in the preceding evening, deer, turkies, and fish, as presents; and, even on the morning of the massacre, came freely among the whites, behaving in their usual friendly manner, until the very instant which had been appointed for the commencement of the scene of carnage. The fatal hour being arrived, they fell at once on every settlement, and murdered without distinction of age or sex. So sudden was the execution of their plan, that few perceived the weapons, or the approach of the blow, which terminated their existence. Thus, in one hour, and almost in the same instant, fell three hundred and forty-seven men, women and children; most of them by their own plantation tools.

The 22nd of March was set as the day to attack all the English settlements. To better hide their intentions and ensure success, they brought deer, turkeys, and fish as gifts the night before; even on the morning of the massacre, they mingled freely with the colonists, acting as friendly as usual until the exact moment for the slaughter. When the fateful hour arrived, they lunged at every settlement and killed without regard for age or gender. The speed of their plan was such that few noticed the weapons or the imminent attack that ended their lives. In just one hour, almost simultaneously, three hundred and forty-seven men, women, and children perished, most of them by their own farming tools.

The massacre would have been still more complete, had not information been given, the preceding night, to a Mr. Pace, by an Indian domesticated in his house, and treated as a son, who, being pressed to murder his benefactor, disclosed the plot to him. He immediately carried the intelligence to Jamestown, and the alarm was given to some of the nearest settlements, which were thereby saved. At some other places, too, where the circumstances of the attack enabled the English to seize their arms, the assailants were repulsed.

The massacre would have been even worse if Mr. Pace hadn’t received a warning the night before from an Indian who lived in his house and was treated like a son. When the Indian was coerced to kill his benefactor, he revealed the plan to Mr. Pace. He quickly took the information to Jamestown, and nearby settlements were alerted, which helped save them. In other locations as well, where the attackers' circumstances allowed the English to grab their weapons, the assailants were pushed back.

General war.

This horrible massacre was succeeded by a vindictive and exterminating war, in which the wiles of the Indians were successfully retaliated on themselves. During this disastrous period, many public works were abandoned; the college institution was deserted; the settlements were reduced from eighty to eight; and famine superadded its afflicting scourge to the accumulated distresses of the colony.[36]

This terrible massacre was followed by a vengeful and destructive war, where the tactics of the Native Americans were turned against them. During this tragic time, many public projects were left unfinished; the college was abandoned; the number of settlements dropped from eighty to eight; and famine added to the already overwhelming suffering of the colony.[36]

As soon as intelligence of these calamitous events reached England, a contribution was made by the adventurers for the relief of the sufferers; arms from the tower were delivered to the treasurer and company; and several vessels were dispatched with those articles which might best alleviate such complicated distress.

As soon as news of these disastrous events got to England, the adventurers contributed to help the victims; weapons from the tower were given to the treasurer and his team; and several ships were sent out with supplies that could best relieve such complex hardships.

Dissension and dissolution of the company.

But the dissolution of the company was rapidly approaching. That corporation contained many men of the first rank and talents in the nation, who in their assemblies, were in habits of discussing the measures of the crown with the accustomed freedom of a popular body. Two violent factions, which assumed the regular appearance of court and country parties, divided the company, and struggled for the ascendancy. James endeavoured to give the preponderance to the court party, but his endeavours were unsuccessful; and his failure disposed him to listen to complaints against a corporation, whose deliberations he found himself unable to control. To their mismanagement he ascribed the slow progress made by the colony, and the heavy losses that had been sustained.[37]

But the breakup of the company was quickly on the horizon. That corporation was made up of some of the most talented and influential men in the nation, who, in their meetings, regularly discussed the crown's decisions with the expected freedom of a popular assembly. Two intense factions, which took on the familiar form of court and country parties, split the company and fought for dominance. James tried to tip the balance in favor of the court party, but his efforts were unsuccessful; and his failure led him to be more receptive to complaints about a corporation whose actions he found impossible to manage. He blamed their poor leadership for the slow progress of the colony and the significant losses that had occurred.[37]

1623

After hearing both the corporation and their accusers, the privy council determined to issue a commission, appointing persons to be named by the crown, to inquire into the affairs of Virginia from the earliest settlement of the province, and to report thereon to the government. This commission seized the charters, books, and papers of the company; and all letters and packets brought from the colony were ordered to be laid unopened before the privy council. Their report attributed the misfortunes of the colony to the corporation in England; and James, at no time a friend to popular assemblies, communicated to them his resolution to revoke the old charter and grant a new one, which should respect private property, but place power in fewer hands. The requisition that they should assent to this proposition, and surrender their charter, was accompanied with the information that the King was determined, in default of submission, to take such proceedings for recalling their letters patent as might be just. 1624Colony taken into the hands of the King.The company, however, resolutely determined to defend its rights; whereupon a writ of quo warranto was instituted in the court of King's Bench, which was decided according to the wishes of the monarch. The company was dissolved, and all its powers were revested in the crown.

After hearing from both the corporation and their accusers, the privy council decided to issue a commission, appointing people named by the crown to investigate the affairs of Virginia from the earliest days of the colony and report back to the government. This commission took control of the charters, books, and papers of the company, and all letters and packages sent from the colony were ordered to be presented unopened to the privy council. Their report blamed the colony's troubles on the corporation in England; and James, who was never a supporter of popular assemblies, informed them of his decision to revoke the old charter and issue a new one that would protect private property but concentrate power in fewer hands. The demand for them to agree to this proposal and surrender their charter came with the warning that the King was determined, if they didn’t comply, to take actions to retract their letters patent as he deemed appropriate. 1624Colony handed over to the King. However, the company firmly resolved to defend its rights; as a result, a writ of quo warranto was filed in the court of King's Bench, which was ruled in favor of the monarch. The company was dissolved, and all its powers were returned to the crown.

Above one hundred and fifty thousand pounds sterling had been expended in planting the colony; and more than nine thousand persons had been sent from England to people it. Yet, at the dissolution of the company, the annual imports from Virginia did not exceed twenty thousand pounds in value, and the population of the country was reduced to about eighteen hundred persons.

Over one hundred and fifty thousand pounds sterling had been spent on establishing the colony, and more than nine thousand people had been sent from England to populate it. Yet, when the company was dissolved, the yearly imports from Virginia were only valued at about twenty thousand pounds, and the population had decreased to around eighteen hundred people.

While these things were transacting in England, the war against the Indians was prosecuted in the colony, with vigour and success. The neighbouring hostile tribes were nearly exterminated, and were driven entirely from the rivers, so that the settlements were extended in safety.

While these events were happening in England, the war against the Indians was being fought in the colony with energy and success. The nearby hostile tribes were almost wiped out and completely driven away from the rivers, allowing the settlements to expand safely.

In February, the general assembly was once more convened. The several orders which had been previously made by the governor and council, were enacted into laws; and form the oldest legislative rules of action now remaining on record. Among them are various regulations respecting the church of England. But the act best representing the condition of the colonists, is a solemn declaration, "that the governor should not impose any taxes on the colony, otherwise than by the authority of the general assembly; and that he should not withdraw the inhabitants from their private labour to any service of his own." At this session, too, the privilege of exemption from arrest, while the assembly was sitting, was extended to the burgesses. Several other measures were adopted for the correction of abuses; and the laws of that session, generally, are marked with that good sense and patriotism, which are to be expected from men perfectly understanding their own situation, and legislating for themselves.

In February, the general assembly was called together once again. The various orders previously made by the governor and council were turned into laws and now represent the oldest legislative rules still on record. Among these are several regulations concerning the Church of England. However, the act that best reflects the situation of the colonists is a formal declaration stating that "the governor should not impose any taxes on the colony without the authority of the general assembly; and that he should not pull the inhabitants away from their personal work for any of his own purposes." During this session, the privilege of being exempt from arrest while the assembly was in session was also granted to the burgesses. Several other measures were implemented to correct abuses, and the laws from that session are generally characterized by a good sense and patriotism that one would expect from people fully aware of their own situation and making laws for themselves.

From this assembly, the royal commissioners endeavoured, in vain, to procure an address to the King, professing "their willingness to submit themselves to his princely pleasure, in revoking the ancient patents;" but a petition was agreed to and transmitted, acknowledging their satisfaction at his having taken the plantation into his more especial care, beseeching him to continue the then form of government, to confirm to Virginia and the Somers isles, the sole importation of tobacco, and soliciting that, if the promised aid of soldiers should be granted them, the governor and assembly might have a voice in directing their operations.

From this meeting, the royal commissioners tried, without success, to get an address to the King, expressing "their willingness to follow his royal wishes by canceling the old patents;" however, a petition was agreed upon and sent, expressing their appreciation for his taking special care of the plantation, asking him to maintain the current form of government, to grant Virginia and the Somers Isles exclusive rights to import tobacco, and requesting that, if the promised support of soldiers was provided, the governor and assembly could have a say in directing their actions.

Virginia having thus become a royal government, the King issued a special commission, appointing a governor and twelve councillors, to whom the entire direction of the affairs of the province was committed. No assembly was mentioned, nor was it intended to permit the continuance of that body, for, to the popular shape of the late system, James attributed the disasters of the colony. But some attention to their interests, was mingled with this subversion of political liberty. Yielding to the petitions of the English parliament and of the colonists, he issued a proclamation prohibiting the growth of tobacco in the kingdom, and the importation of it into England or Ireland, except from Virginia, or the Somers isles, and in vessels belonging to his subjects. His death prevented the completion of a legislative code for the colony, which he had commenced, and which he flattered himself, would remedy all the ills that had been experienced.

Virginia, having become a royal government, the King issued a special commission, appointing a governor and twelve councillors, to whom the full management of the province's affairs was handed over. No assembly was mentioned, nor was it intended to allow that body to continue, as James believed the problems of the colony were due to the popular nature of the previous system. However, alongside this undermining of political freedom, some attention was given to their interests. Responding to the petitions from the English parliament and the colonists, he issued a proclamation banning the growth of tobacco in the kingdom and its importation into England or Ireland, except from Virginia or the Somers Isles, and only in ships owned by his subjects. His death prevented the finalization of a legislative code for the colony, which he had started, hoping it would solve all the issues they had faced.

Charles I.
Arbitrary measures of the crown.
1625

Charles I. adopted, in its full extent, the colonial system of his father. He committed to Sir George Yeardly, whom he appointed governor of Virginia, and to his council, the whole legislative and executive powers of the colony, with instructions to conform exactly to orders which should be received from him. They were empowered to make laws and to execute them; to impose taxes, and to enforce the payment of them; to seize the property of the late company; and to apply it to the public use; and to transport the colonists to England, to be punished there for crimes committed in Virginia. To complete this hateful system, the crown exacted a monopoly of the tobacco trade, and appointed agents, to whose management that article was entirely committed.[38]

Charles I fully embraced his father's colonial system. He entrusted Sir George Yeardley, who he appointed as the governor of Virginia, and his council with all legislative and executive powers of the colony, with instructions to strictly follow orders he would send. They had the authority to create laws and enforce them; to levy taxes and ensure they were paid; to seize the property of the former company and use it for public purposes; and to send colonists back to England to face punishment for crimes committed in Virginia. To finalize this oppressive system, the crown demanded a monopoly on the tobacco trade and appointed agents to manage that commodity entirely.[38]

1629
Sir John Harvey.

The full pressure of these arbitrary regulations was not felt till Sir John Harvey, on the Sir John death of Sir George Yeardly, was appointed governor of Virginia. The mind of this gentleman is represented by the historians of the day, as having been of a structure to make even tyranny more odious. Rapacious, haughty, and unfeeling, he exercised his powers in the most offensive manner. Respect for his commission, suppressed opposition to his authority for several years. 1636Roused, at length, almost to madness by oppression, the Virginians, in a fit of popular rage, seized their governor, and sent him a prisoner to England, accompanied by two deputies charged with the duty of representing their grievances, and his misconduct.

The full impact of these unreasonable regulations wasn't felt until Sir John Harvey was appointed governor of Virginia after the death of Sir George Yeardly. Historians of the time describe this gentleman as having a personality that made even tyranny seem more unbearable. Greedy, arrogant, and insensitive, he wielded his powers in a highly offensive way. Out of respect for his authority, opposition to his rule was suppressed for several years. 1636 Finally pushed to the brink by oppression, the Virginians, in a surge of public anger, captured their governor and sent him as a prisoner to England, along with two representatives tasked with presenting their complaints and highlighting his misconduct.

Charles deemed it necessary to discountenance this summary and violent proceeding, so entirely incompatible with that implicit obedience which he had ever exacted from his subjects. The deputies of the colony were sternly received; no inquiry appears to have been made into the conduct of Harvey; 1637and, early in the succeeding year, he was sent back to Virginia, invested with all his former powers.[39]

Charles considered it important to reject this abrupt and forceful action, which was completely at odds with the unquestioning loyalty he always demanded from his subjects. The colony's representatives were received harshly; it seems no questions were raised about Harvey's actions; 1637 and, early in the following year, he was sent back to Virginia with all his previous powers intact.[39]

The time, however, approached, when a new system of administration was to be adopted. The discontents of the nation, and his own wants, obliged Charles to determine on convening a parliament. He was probably unwilling to increase the ill temper resulting from his maladministration at home, by bringing before the representatives of the people, complaints of the despotism which had been exercised in America.

The time, however, came when a new system of administration needed to be put in place. The nation's discontent and his own needs forced Charles to decide to call a parliament. He likely didn't want to add to the bad mood caused by his poor management at home by presenting the representatives of the people with complaints about the tyranny that had been imposed in America.

Sir William Berkeley.

To this change of circumstances may be ascribed the appointment of Sir William Berkeley to succeed Harvey as governor of Virginia. In almost every respect, this gentleman was unlike his predecessor. Highly respectable for his rank and abilities, he was still more distinguished by his integrity, by the mildness of his temper, and by the gentleness of his manners. To complete the satisfaction of the colonists, he was empowered and directed to summon the burgesses of all the plantations, to meet the governor and council in the general assembly, Provincial assembly restored.and thereby to restore to the people their share in the government. These changes had such an effect in Virginia that, when afterward informed of a petition presented in the name of the assembly to parliament, "praying for the restoration of the ancient patents, and corporation government," the general assembly not only transmitted an explicit disavowal of it, but sent an address to the King, expressing their high sense of his favour towards them, and earnestly desiring to continue under his immediate protection. During the civil war, as well as after the establishment of the commonwealth, they continued firm in their attachment to the royal family.

To this change in circumstances can be attributed the appointment of Sir William Berkeley to replace Harvey as governor of Virginia. In nearly every way, this man was different from his predecessor. Well-respected for his rank and skills, he was even more notable for his integrity, calm demeanor, and gentle manners. To fully satisfy the colonists, he was given the authority and directed to call the burgesses of all the plantations to meet with the governor and council in the general assembly, Provincial assembly is back. thereby restoring the people's share in the government. These changes had such an impact in Virginia that, when they later learned of a petition presented to parliament in the name of the assembly "asking for the restoration of the ancient patents and corporate government," the general assembly not only sent a clear rejection of it but also an address to the King, expressing their deep appreciation for his favor towards them and strongly wanting to remain under his direct protection. Throughout the civil war and after the commonwealth was established, they remained loyal to the royal family.

1650

The House of Commons, however, having succeeded in the establishment of its power over England, was not disposed to permit its authority to be questioned in Virginia. An ordinance was passed, declaring that, as the colonies were settled at the cost and by the people of England, "they are and ought to be subordinate to, and dependent on, that nation; and subject to such law and regulations as are or shall be made by parliament. That in Virginia and other places, the powers of government had been usurped by persons who had set themselves up in opposition to the commonwealth, who were therefore denounced as rebels and traitors; and all foreign vessels were forbidden to enter the ports of any of the English settlements in America." As the men who then governed were not in the habit of making empty declarations, the council of state was empowered to send a fleet to enforce obedience to parliament.[40]

The House of Commons, now firmly established as the authority in England, was unwilling to let its power be challenged in Virginia. They passed an ordinance stating that since the colonies were settled at England's expense and by its people, "they are and should be subordinate to, and dependent on, that nation; and subject to the laws and regulations made by parliament. It was noted that in Virginia and elsewhere, some individuals had illegally taken control of the government in defiance of the commonwealth and were labeled as rebels and traitors; furthermore, all foreign ships were banned from entering the ports of any English settlements in America." The governing leaders at that time did not make empty claims, so the council of state was authorized to dispatch a fleet to enforce adherence to parliament.[40]

Sir George Ayscue was accordingly detached with a powerful squadron, and was instructed to endeavour, by gentle means, to bring the colonists to obedience; but, if these failed, to use force, and to give freedom to such servants and slaves of those who should resist, as would serve in the troops under his command. 1651After reducing Barbadoes, and the other islands to submission, the squadron entered the Chesapeak. Berkeley, having hired a few Dutch ships which were then trading to Virginia, made a gallant resistance; but, unable long to maintain so unequal a contest, he yielded to superior force, having first stipulated for a general amnesty. He then withdrew to a retired situation where, beloved and respected by the people, he resided as a private man, until a counter revolution called him, once more, to preside over the colony.[41]

Sir George Ayscue was sent out with a strong fleet and instructed to try to persuade the colonists to comply peacefully; but if that didn't work, he was to use force and grant freedom to any servants and slaves of those who resisted, as long as they would join the troops under his command. 1651 After bringing Barbados and the other islands into submission, the squadron entered Chesapeake. Berkeley, having hired a few Dutch ships that were trading in Virginia, put up a brave fight; however, he couldn't sustain such an uneven battle for long and eventually surrendered to the stronger force, after negotiating for a general pardon. He then retired to a quiet place where he was loved and respected by the people, living as a private citizen until a counter-revolution called him back to lead the colony again.[41]

After the revocation of the charter, it became more easy to obtain large grants of land. This circumstance, notwithstanding the tyranny of the provincial government, promoted emigration, and considerably increased the population of the colony. At the commencement of the civil war, Virginia was supposed to contain about twenty thousand souls.[42]

After the charter was revoked, it became easier to get large land grants. This situation, despite the harshness of the provincial government, encouraged people to move there and significantly boosted the colony's population. By the start of the civil war, Virginia was estimated to have around twenty thousand people.[42]

While the ordinance of 1650, forbidding all trade between the colonies and foreign nations, was dispensed with in favour of republican New England, it was rigorously enforced against the loyal colony of Virginia. These restrictions were the more burdensome, because England did not then furnish a sufficient market for all the produce, nor a supply for all the wants of the colonies. This severity was not calculated to detach the affections of the people from the royal family. Their discontents were cherished, too, by the great number of cavaliers who had fled to Virginia after the total defeat of their party in England. Taking advantage of an interregnum occasioned by the sudden death of governor Matthews, the people resolved to throw off their forced allegiance to the commonwealth, and called on Sir William Berkeley to resume the government. He required only their solemn promise to venture their lives and fortunes with him in support of their King. Charles II. proclaimed in Virginia.This being readily given, Charles II. was proclaimed in Virginia, before intelligence had been received of the death of Cromwell. His restoration was soon afterwards effected in England; and this rash measure not only escaped chastisement, but became a meritorious service of which Virginia long boasted, and which was not entirely forgotten by the Prince.[43]

While the ordinance from 1650 that banned all trade between the colonies and foreign nations was set aside for republican New England, it was strictly enforced against the loyal colony of Virginia. These restrictions were especially burdensome because England wasn’t providing enough market for all the goods produced nor enough supplies for all the needs of the colonies. This harsh treatment did not help win the people’s loyalty to the royal family. Their frustrations were also fueled by the many cavaliers who had fled to Virginia after their party was completely defeated in England. Taking advantage of a leadership vacuum created by the sudden death of Governor Matthews, the people decided to abandon their forced loyalty to the commonwealth and called on Sir William Berkeley to take over the government. He only asked for their solemn promise to risk their lives and fortunes with him to support their King. Charles II proclaimed in Virginia. This promise was quickly given, and Charles II was proclaimed in Virginia before news of Cromwell's death was received. His restoration soon followed in England; and this hasty action not only avoided punishment but also became a point of pride for Virginia, which was not entirely forgotten by the Prince.[43]

At the restoration, the colony contained about thirty thousand persons.

At the time of the restoration, the colony had around thirty thousand people.

One of the causes which, during the government of Harvey, had disquieted Virginia, was the diminution of territory occasioned by grants of great tracts of country lying within the limits of the colony. The most remarkable of these was the grant of Maryland to Lord Baltimore.

One of the issues that, during Harvey's administration, troubled Virginia was the loss of territory due to large land grants within the colony's borders. The most notable of these was the grant of Maryland to Lord Baltimore.

Maryland.

In June 1632, Charles I. granted to that nobleman for ever, "that region bounded by a line drawn from Watkin's Point on Chesapeak bay, to the ocean on the east; thence, to that part of the estuary of Delaware on the north, which lieth under the 40th degree, where New England is terminated; thence, in a right line, by the degree aforesaid, to the meridian of the fountain of the Potowmac; thence, following its course, by the farther bank to its confluence." The territory described in this grant was denominated Maryland, and was separated entirely from Virginia. The proprietor was empowered, with the assent of the freemen, or their delegates, whom he was required to assemble for that purpose, to make all laws for the government of the new colony, not inconsistent with the laws of England. Privileges, in other respects analogous to those given to the other colonies, were comprised in this charter; and it is remarkable that it contains no clause obliging the proprietary to submit the laws which might be enacted to the King, for his approbation or dissent; nor any reservation of the right of the crown to interfere in the government of the province.[44]

In June 1632, Charles I granted to that nobleman forever, "that area bounded by a line drawn from Watkin's Point on Chesapeake Bay to the ocean on the east; then, to that part of the Delaware estuary on the north, which lies under the 40th degree, where New England ends; then, in a straight line, along that degree to the meridian of the Potomac River's source; then, following its course, by the further bank to its confluence." The territory described in this grant was named Maryland and was completely separated from Virginia. The proprietor was authorized, with the agreement of the free men or their representatives, whom he was required to gather for that purpose, to create all laws for governing the new colony, as long as they weren't inconsistent with English law. The privileges, in other ways similar to those granted to other colonies, were included in this charter; and it is notable that it has no clause requiring the proprietary to submit any laws enacted to the King for his approval or disapproval; nor does it reserve any right for the crown to interfere in the province's government.[44]

This is the first example of the dismemberment of a colony, and the creation of another within its original limits, by the mere act of the crown.

This is the first example of a colony being cut up and a new one being formed within its original boundaries, just by the simple act of the crown.

The first migration into the new colony consisted of about two hundred gentlemen with their adherents, chiefly Roman Catholics, who sailed from England under Calvert, the brother of the proprietor, in November, 1633and, early in the following year, landed in Maryland, near the mouth of the Potowmac. Their first effort was to conciliate the good will of the natives, whose town they purchased, and called St. Mary's. This measure was as wise as it was just. By obtaining the peaceable possession of land already prepared for cultivation, the Marylanders were enabled to raise their food immediately; and this circumstance, together with their neighbourhood to Virginia, where the necessaries of life were then raised in abundance, secured them from famine and its concomitant diseases;—afflictions which had swept away such numbers of the first settlers of North America.

The first migration to the new colony included about two hundred gentlemen and their followers, mainly Roman Catholics, who set sail from England under Calvert, the proprietor's brother, in November, 1633. Early the next year, they landed in Maryland, near the mouth of the Potomac. Their initial goal was to win the goodwill of the native people, whose town they bought and named St. Mary's. This decision was both smart and fair. By peacefully acquiring land that was already suitable for farming, the Maryland settlers were able to grow their food right away; this, along with their proximity to Virginia, where essentials were plentiful, protected them from hunger and the diseases that often accompanied it—issues that had devastated many of the early settlers in North America.

The inhabitants of Virginia presented a petition against the grant to Lord Baltimore, which was heard before the privy council in July, 1633. The decision was in favour of the continuance of the patent; leaving to the petitioners their remedy at law. To prevent farther differences, free commerce was permitted between the colonies; and they were enjoined to receive no fugitives from each other; to do no act which might bring on a war with the natives; and on all occasions to assist each other as became fellow subjects of the same state.

The people of Virginia submitted a petition against the grant to Lord Baltimore, which was heard by the privy council in July 1633. The ruling was in favor of keeping the patent; leaving the petitioners to seek their remedy through legal means. To avoid further conflicts, free trade was allowed between the colonies; and they were instructed not to harbor any fugitives from one another, to avoid any actions that could lead to war with the Native Americans, and to assist each other as good citizens of the same state should.

1635
Assembly of all the freemen.

In February 1635, the first assembly of Maryland was convened. It appears to have been composed of the whole body of the freemen. Their acts were, most probably, not approved by the proprietor, who transmitted, in turn, for their consideration, a code of laws prepared by himself. 1638This code was laid before the assembly who rejected it without hesitation, and prepared a body of regulations adapted to their situation. William Clayborne.Among these was an act of attainder against William Clayborne, who was charged with felony and sedition, with having exercised the powers of government within the province without authority, and with having excited the Indians to make war on the colony.[45]

In February 1635, Maryland's first assembly was held. It seems to have included all the freemen. Their actions likely weren't approved by the proprietor, who then sent a set of laws he had prepared for their review. 1638 The assembly reviewed this code but rejected it immediately, instead creating a set of regulations suited to their needs. William Claiborne. One of these regulations was an act of attainder against William Clayborne, who was accused of felony and sedition, having acted as a government authority in the province without permission, and inciting the Indians to wage war on the colony.[45]

As early as the year 1631, Charles had granted a license to William Clayborne, one of the council and secretary of state of Virginia, "to traffic in those parts of America for which there is already no patent granted for sole trade." To enforce this license, Harvey, then governor of Virginia, had granted his commission also, containing the same powers. Under this license and commission, Clayborne made a small settlement in the isle of Kent, near Annapolis, which he continued to claim; and refused to submit to the jurisdiction of Maryland. Not content with infusing his own turbulent spirit into the inhabitants of Kent island, he scattered jealousies among the natives, and persuaded them that "the new comers" were Spaniards, and enemies of the Virginians. Having been indicted, and found guilty of murder, piracy, and sedition, he fled from justice; whereupon his estate was seized and confiscated. Clayborne loudly denounced these proceedings as oppressive, and complained of them to his sovereign. At the same time, he prayed for a confirmation of his former license to trade, and for a grant of other lands adjoining the isle of Kent, with power to govern them. The lords commissioners of the colonies, to whom this subject was referred, determined that the lands in question belonged to Lord Baltimore; and that no plantation, or trade with the Indians, within the limits of his patent, ought to be allowed, without his permission. The other complaints made by Clayborne were not deemed proper for the interference of government.

As early as 1631, Charles granted a license to William Clayborne, a council member and secretary of state of Virginia, "to trade in parts of America for which no exclusive trading patent had been granted." To support this license, Harvey, the governor of Virginia at the time, also issued his commission with the same powers. With this license and commission, Clayborne established a small settlement on Kent Island, near Annapolis, which he continued to claim; he refused to accept the authority of Maryland. Not satisfied with stirring up trouble among the residents of Kent Island, he spread distrust among the local natives, convincing them that "the newcomers" were Spaniards and enemies of the Virginians. After being indicted and found guilty of murder, piracy, and sedition, he fled from justice, leading to the seizure and confiscation of his estate. Clayborne loudly condemned these actions as oppressive and appealed to his sovereign. At the same time, he requested confirmation of his previous trading license and a grant for additional lands adjacent to Kent Island, along with governing rights. The lords commissioners of the colonies, to whom this matter was referred, decided that the lands in question belonged to Lord Baltimore, and that no plantation or trade with the Indians within the boundaries of his patent should be permitted without his consent. The other complaints from Clayborne were not seen as appropriate for government intervention.

1639

Hitherto, the legislature had been composed of the whole body of the freemen. But the increase of population, and the extension of settlements, having rendered the exercise of the sovereign power by the people themselves intolerably burdensome, an act was passed, in 1639, "for establishing the House of Assembly." This act declared that those elected should be called burgesses, and should supply the place of the freemen who chose them, as do the representatives in the Parliament of England. These burgesses, with others called by special writ, together with the governor and secretary, were to constitute the General Assembly; but the two branches of the legislature were to sit in the same chamber. In 1650, this last regulation was changed; and an act was passed declaring that those called by special writ should form the upper house, while those chosen by the hundreds should compose the lower house; and that bills assented to by both branches of the legislature and by the governor, should be deemed the laws of the province.

Until now, the legislature had been made up of all the freemen. However, the growing population and the expansion of settlements made it too difficult for the people to exercise sovereign power directly. So, in 1639, an act was passed "to establish the House of Assembly." This act stated that those elected would be called burgesses and would represent the freemen who chose them, similar to how representatives work in the Parliament of England. These burgesses, along with others called by special writ, and the governor and secretary, would make up the General Assembly, but both branches of the legislature would meet in the same chamber. In 1650, this setup was changed, and an act was passed stating that those called by special writ would form the upper house, while those elected by the hundreds would make up the lower house; bills approved by both branches of the legislature and the governor would be considered the laws of the province.

Perfect harmony prevailed between the proprietor and the people; and Maryland, attentive to its own affairs, remained in a state of increasing prosperity until the civil war broke out in England. This government, like that of Virginia, was attached to the royal cause; 1641but Clayborne, who took part with the Parliament, found means to intrigue among the people, and to raise an insurrection in the province. Calvert, the governor, was obliged to fly to Virginia for protection; and the insurgents seized the reins of government. After the suppression of this revolt, and the restoration of tranquillity, an act of general pardon and oblivion was passed, from the benefits of which only a few leading individuals were excepted; but this, like most other insurrections, produced additional burdens on the people which did not so soon pass away. A duty, for seven years, of ten shillings on every hundred weight of tobacco exported in Dutch bottoms, was granted to the proprietor; the one-half of which was appropriated to satisfy claims produced by the recovery and defence of the province.[46]

Perfect harmony existed between the owner and the people, and Maryland, focused on its own matters, enjoyed continuous prosperity until the civil war erupted in England. This government, like Virginia's, supported the royal cause; 1641 but Clayborne, who sided with Parliament, managed to stir discontent among the people and incite a rebellion in the province. Calvert, the governor, had to flee to Virginia for safety, and the rebels took control of the government. After the uprising was quelled and peace was restored, a law for general amnesty and forgetting past grievances was passed, benefiting all except a few key individuals; however, like most uprisings, it imposed extra burdens on the people that lingered. For seven years, a duty of ten shillings on every hundredweight of tobacco shipped in Dutch ships was assigned to the owner; half of this was set aside to cover costs linked to securing and defending the province.[46]

1651

This state of repose was disturbed by the superintending care of Parliament. In September 1651, commissioners were appointed "for reducing and governing the colonies within the bay of Chesapeak." Among them was Clayborne, the evil genius of Maryland. As the proprietor had acknowledged and submitted to the authority of Parliament, he was permitted to govern the colony in the name of "the keepers of the liberties of England;" but could not long retain the possession of actual authority. The distractions of England, having found their way into Maryland, divided the colonists; and the commissioners supported with their countenance, the faction opposed to the established government. The contentions generated by this state of things, at length broke out in a civil war, which terminated in the defeat of the governor and the Roman Catholics. A new assembly was convened, which, being entirely under the influence of the victorious party, passed an act declaring that none who professed the popish religion could be protected in the province by the laws; that such as profess faith in God by Jesus Christ, although dissenting from the doctrine and discipline publicly held forth, should not be restrained from the exercise of their religion, provided such liberty was not extended to popery, or prelacy, or to such as, under the profession of Christ, practise licentiousness. Other laws in the same spirit were enacted; and a persecution was commenced against the Quakers, as well as against those guilty of popery, and prelacy.

This state of calm was disrupted by the overseeing attention of Parliament. In September 1651, commissioners were appointed "to manage and govern the colonies within the Chesapeake Bay." Among them was Clayborne, the troublesome figure for Maryland. Since the proprietor had accepted and submitted to Parliament's authority, he was allowed to govern the colony on behalf of "the keepers of the liberties of England;" but he could not hold actual power for long. The unrest in England made its way into Maryland, dividing the colonists; the commissioners supported the faction that opposed the established government. The conflicts caused by this situation eventually escalated into a civil war, which ended in the defeat of the governor and the Roman Catholics. A new assembly was convened, which, being entirely influenced by the victorious side, passed a law stating that no one who practiced the Catholic faith could be protected in the province by the laws; that those who professed faith in God through Jesus Christ, even if they differed from the publicly held doctrines and practices, should not be restricted in their religious practices, as long as this freedom did not extend to Catholicism, episcopacy, or to those who, while professing Christ, engaged in immoral behavior. Other laws in the same vein were enacted; and a persecution was initiated against the Quakers as well as against those accused of being Catholics or Episcopalians.

A scene of revolutionary turbulence ensued, in the course of which a resolution was passed declaring the upper house to be useless, which continued in force until the restoration. Philip Calvert was then appointed governor by Lord Baltimore, and the ancient order of things was restored. The colony, notwithstanding these commotions, continued to flourish; and, at the restoration, its population was estimated at twelve thousand souls.

A chaotic scene unfolded during which a decision was made declaring the upper house to be ineffective, and this ruling stayed in place until the restoration. Philip Calvert was then appointed governor by Lord Baltimore, and the old order was reinstated. Despite these upheavals, the colony continued to thrive; by the time of the restoration, its population was estimated at twelve thousand people.


CHAPTER III.

First ineffectual attempts of the Plymouth company to settle the country.... Settlement at New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and company.... New charter.... Settlements prosecuted vigorously.... Government transferred to the colonists.... Boston founded.... Religious intolerance.... General court established.... Royal commission for the government of the plantations.... Contest with the French colony of Acadié.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchinson.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the patent of the colony.... Religious dissensions.... Providence settled.... Rhode Island settled.... Connecticut settled.... War with the Piquods.... New Haven settled.

Initial unsuccessful attempts by the Plymouth company to establish a presence in the area.... Settlement at New Plymouth.... Sir Henry Rosewell and associates.... New charter.... Settlements actively pursued.... Government handed over to the colonists.... Boston established.... Religious intolerance.... General court created.... Royal commission for managing the plantations.... Conflict with the French colony of Acadié.... Hugh Peters.... Henry Vane.... Mrs. Hutchinson.... Maine granted to Gorges.... Quo warranto against the colony's patent.... Religious conflicts.... Providence established.... Rhode Island established.... Connecticut established.... War with the Pequot.... New Haven established.

 

1606

The steps by which the first, or southern colony, advanced to a firm and permanent establishment, were slow and painful. The company for founding the second, or northern colony, was composed of gentlemen residing in Plymouth, and other parts of the west of England; was less wealthy, and possessed fewer resources than the first company, which resided in the capital. Their efforts were consequently more feeble, and less successful, than those which were made in the south.[47]

The steps taken to establish the first, or southern colony, were slow and difficult. The group that formed the second, or northern colony, was made up of gentlemen from Plymouth and other areas in the southwest of England; they were less wealthy and had fewer resources than the first company, which was based in the capital. As a result, their efforts were weaker and less successful compared to those made in the south.[47]

The first vessel fitted out by this company was captured and confiscated by the Spaniards, who, at that time, asserted a right to exclude the ships of all other nations from navigating the American seas. Not discouraged by this misfortune, 1607the company in the following year dispatched two other vessels, having on board about two hundred persons designed to form the proposed settlement. The colonists arrived safely on the American coast in autumn, and took possession of a piece of ground near the river Sagahadoc, where they built fort St. George. Their sufferings during the ensuing winter were extreme. Many of the company, among whom were Gilbert their admiral, and George Popham their president, sank under the diseases by which they were attacked; and the vessels which brought them supplies in the following spring, brought also the information that their principal patron, Sir John Popham, chief justice of England, was dead. 1608Discouraged by their losses and sufferings, and by the death of a person on whom they relied chiefly for assistance, the surviving colonists determined to abandon the country, and embark on board the vessels then returning to England. The frightful pictures they drew of the country, and of the climate, deterred the company, for some time, from farther attempts to make a settlement, and their enterprizes were limited to voyages for the purposes of taking fish, and of trading with the natives for furs. 1614One of these was made by captain Smith, so distinguished in the history of Virginia. Having explored, with great accuracy, that part of the coast which stretches from Penobscot to Cape Cod, he delineated it on a map; which he presented to the young Prince of Wales, with descriptions dictated by a sanguine mind, in which enthusiasm was combined with genius. The imagination of the Prince was so wrought upon by the glowing colours in which Smith painted the country, that he declared it should be called New England, which name it has ever since retained.[48]

The first ship outfitted by this company was captured and taken by the Spaniards, who claimed the right to keep ships from other nations out of the American seas. Not discouraged by this setback, 1607 the company sent out two more ships the following year, carrying about two hundred people meant to establish the intended settlement. The colonists safely reached the American coast in the fall and claimed a stretch of land near the Sagahadoc River, where they built Fort St. George. Their hardships during the next winter were severe. Many in the group, including their admiral Gilbert and their president George Popham, succumbed to the diseases that struck them; the ships that came with supplies the following spring also brought the news that their main supporter, Sir John Popham, Chief Justice of England, had died. 1608 Disheartened by their losses and suffering, and by the death of someone they depended on for support, the remaining colonists decided to leave the area and board the ships returning to England. The grim descriptions they provided of the land and its climate held back the company from further attempts to settle, and their activities were limited to fishing trips and trading with the locals for furs. 1614 One of these expeditions was led by Captain Smith, a notable figure in Virginia's history. After thoroughly exploring the coastline from Penobscot to Cape Cod, he mapped it out and presented it to the young Prince of Wales, along with descriptions fueled by an optimistic spirit where enthusiasm met talent. The Prince was so inspired by Smith's vivid portrayal of the land that he declared it should be called New England, a name it has kept ever since.[48]

The languishing company of Plymouth, however, could not be stimulated to engage in farther schemes of colonisation, the advantages of which were distant and uncertain, while the expense was immediate and inevitable. To a stronger motive than even interest, is New England indebted for its first settlement.

The struggling company of Plymouth, however, couldn't be motivated to pursue further colonization plans, the benefits of which were distant and unclear, while the costs were immediate and unavoidable. New England owes its first settlement to a stronger motivation than just self-interest.

An obscure sect, which had acquired the appellation of Brownists from the name of its founder, and which had rendered itself peculiarly obnoxious by the democracy of its tenets respecting church government, had been driven by persecution to take refuge at Leyden in Holland, where its members formed a distinct society under the care of their pastor, Mr. John Robinson. There they resided several years in safe obscurity. This situation, at length, became irksome to them. Their families intermingled with the Dutch, and they saw before them, with extreme apprehension, the danger of losing their separate identity. Under the influence of these and other causes, they came to the determination of removing in a body to America.

A little-known group, which got the name Brownists from its founder, and which made itself particularly unpopular because of its democratic beliefs about church governance, had been forced by persecution to seek refuge in Leyden, Holland, where its members formed a separate community under their pastor, Mr. John Robinson. They lived there for several years in relative safety. Eventually, this situation became frustrating for them. Their families mingled with the Dutch, and they were increasingly worried about the risk of losing their unique identity. Driven by these and other reasons, they decided to move en masse to America.

1618

They applied to the London company for a grant of lands; and, to promote the success of their application by the certainty of their emigrating, they said, "that they were well weaned from the delicate milk of their mother country, and inured to the difficulties of a strange land. That they were knit together in a strict and sacred bond, by virtue of which they held themselves bound to take care of the good of each other, and of the whole. That it was not with them, as with other men, whom small things could discourage, or small discontents cause to wish themselves at home again." The only privilege on which they insisted, was a license under the great seal, to practise and profess religion in that mode, which, under the impulse of conscience, they had adopted. This reasonable and moderate request was refused. James had already established the church of England in Virginia; and, although he promised to connive at their non-conformity, and not to molest them while they demeaned themselves peaceably, he positively refused to give that explicit and solemn pledge of security, which they required. This, for a short time, suspended their removal; but the causes of their discontent in Holland continuing, they, at length, determined to trust to the verbal declarations of the King, and negotiated with the Virginia company for a tract of land within the limits of their patent.[49]

They applied to the London company for a land grant, and to boost their chances of getting it by proving they were committed to immigrating, they stated that they had moved on from the comforts of their home country and were used to the challenges of a new place. They said they were united in a strong and sacred bond that obligated them to look out for each other and the community as a whole. They noted that they weren’t like others who could be easily discouraged or who would quickly wish to return home over minor issues. The only privilege they insisted on was a license under the great seal to practice and profess their religion in the way that their conscience guided them. This reasonable request was denied. James had already established the Church of England in Virginia; although he promised to tolerate their non-conformity and not disturb them as long as they behaved peacefully, he outright refused to provide the explicit and formal assurance of security they wanted. This temporarily delayed their move, but as their dissatisfaction in Holland persisted, they ultimately decided to rely on the King's verbal assurances and negotiated with the Virginia company for a piece of land within the boundaries of their patent.[49]

1620

In September, they sailed from England, with only one hundred and twenty men, in a single ship. Their destination was Hudson's river; but the first land they made was Cape Cod. They soon perceived that they were not only beyond their own limits, but beyond those of the company from which they derived their title; but it was now the month of November, and consequently too late in the season again to put to sea in search of a new habitation. Settlement at New Plymouth.After exploring the coast, they chose a position for their station, to which they gave the name of New at New Plymouth. On the 11th of November, before landing, a solemn covenant was signed by the heads of families, and freemen, in which, after reciting that they had undertaken to plant a colony for the glory of God, and for the honour of their King and country, and professing their loyalty to their sovereign Lord King James, they combined themselves into a body politic, for the purpose of making equal laws for the general good.[50]

In September, they set sail from England with just one hundred and twenty men on a single ship. Their destination was Hudson's River, but the first land they reached was Cape Cod. They quickly realized that they were not only beyond their own territory, but also beyond the limits of the company that gave them their charter. By November, it was too late in the season to search for a new place to settle. Settlement in New Plymouth. After exploring the coastline, they decided on a location for their settlement, which they named New Plymouth. On November 11th, before they landed, a solemn agreement was signed by the heads of families and freemen, stating that they had come to establish a colony for the glory of God and for the honor of their King and country, expressing their loyalty to their sovereign Lord King James. They united to form a political body to create fair laws for the common good.[50]

Having thus formed a compact, the obligation of which all admitted, they proceeded to the choice of a governor for one year; and to enable him the better to discharge the trust confided to him, they gave him one assistant. In 1624, three others were added; and the number was afterwards increased to seven. The supreme power resided in, and, during the infancy of the colony, was exercised by, the whole body of the male inhabitants. They assembled together, occasionally, to determine on all subjects of public concern; nor was a house of representatives established until the year 1639. They adopted the laws of England as a common rule of action, adding occasionally municipal regulations. Some of the changes in their penal code strongly marked their character and circumstances. While only a moderate fine was imposed on forgery, fornication was punished with whipping, and adultery with death.[51]

After forming an agreement that everyone accepted, they chose a governor for a year, and to help him fulfill his duties, they assigned him one assistant. In 1624, three more assistants were added, bringing the total to seven later on. The ultimate authority was held by all the male residents, who got together from time to time to discuss matters of public interest; a house of representatives wasn't established until 1639. They adopted the laws of England as the standard practice, occasionally adding local regulations. Some changes in their laws reflected their unique character and situation. While a small fine was imposed for forgery, whipping was the punishment for fornication, and adultery was punishable by death.[51]

Misguided by their religious theories, they fell into the same error which had been committed in Virginia, and, in imitation of the primitive Christians, threw all their property into a common stock, laboured jointly for the common benefit, and were fed from the common stores. This regulation produced, even in this small and enthusiastic society, its constant effect. They were often in danger of starving; and severe whipping, administered to promote labour, only increased discontent.

Misled by their religious beliefs, they made the same mistake that had happened in Virginia. Following the example of the early Christians, they combined all their property into a shared pool, worked together for the common good, and took food from the shared supplies. This setup had a consistent impact, even in this small and passionate community. They often faced the risk of starvation, and harsh punishment meant to encourage work only led to more dissatisfaction.

The colonists landed at a season of the year which was unfavourable to the establishment of a new settlement. The winter, which was intensely cold, had already commenced; and they were not in a condition to soften its rigours. Before the return of spring, fifty of them perished with maladies increased by the hardships to which they were exposed, by the scarcity of food, and by the almost total privation of those comforts to which they had been accustomed. The survivors, as the season moderated, encountered new difficulties. Their attention to the means of providing for their future wants was interrupted by the necessity of taking up arms to defend themselves against the neighbouring savages. Fortunately for the colonists, the natives had been so wasted by pestilence, the preceding year, that they were easily subdued, and compelled to accept a peace, on equitable terms.

The colonists arrived at a time of year that was not ideal for starting a new settlement. Winter, which was extremely cold, had already begun, and they were not prepared to handle its harshness. Before spring came, fifty of them died from illnesses worsened by the hardships they faced, the lack of food, and the near-total absence of the comforts they were used to. As the weather warmed, the survivors faced new challenges. Their efforts to secure their future needs were interrupted by the need to defend themselves against the local tribes. Fortunately for the colonists, the natives had been severely impacted by disease the previous year, making them easier to defeat and forcing them to accept a peace settlement on fair terms.

The colonists were supported, under these multiplied distresses, by the hope of better times, and by that high gratification which men exasperated by persecution and oppression, derived from the enjoyment of the rights of conscience, and the full exercise of the powers of self-government. From their friends in England, they received occasional but scanty supplies; and continued to struggle against surrounding difficulties, with patience and perseverance. They remained in peace, alike exempt from the notice and oppression of government. Yet, in consequence of the unproductiveness of their soil, and their adherence to the pernicious policy of a community of goods and of labour, they increased more slowly than the other colonies; and, in the year 1630, amounted to only three hundred souls.

The colonists found hope for better days amidst their many hardships, and they took pride in enjoying their rights to freedom of belief and self-governance, which fueled their resilience against persecution and oppression. They received occasional, though limited, support from friends back in England and continued to face their challenges with patience and determination. They lived peacefully, free from government scrutiny and oppression. However, due to their unproductive land and their commitment to the harmful practice of sharing property and labor, their population grew more slowly than that of other colonies, reaching only three hundred people by the year 1630.

Until the year 1630, they possessed no other title to their lands than is derived from occupancy. In that year they obtained a grant from the New Plymouth company, but were never incorporated as a body politic by royal charter. Having received no powers from the parliament or King, and being totally disregarded by the Plymouth company, they remained a mere voluntary association, yielding obedience to laws, and to magistrates, formed and chosen by themselves. In this situation they continued undisturbed, and almost unknown, more tolerant and more moderate than their neighbours, until their union with a younger, and more powerful sister, who advanced with a growth unusually rapid to a state of maturity.[52]

Until 1630, they had no official title to their lands other than what came from their occupancy. That year, they received a grant from the New Plymouth company, but they were never officially recognized as a political body by royal charter. Without any authority from Parliament or the King, and largely ignored by the Plymouth company, they remained a simple voluntary group, following laws and magistrates that they established and chose themselves. In this state, they continued peacefully and mostly unnoticed, being more tolerant and moderate than their neighbors, until they merged with a younger and stronger sister, which grew unusually fast to maturity.[52]

The original company of Plymouth, having done nothing effectual towards settling the territory which had been granted to them, and being unable to preserve the monopoly of their trade and fisheries, applied to James for a new and more enlarged patent. On the 3d of November, he granted that territory which lies between the 40th and 48th degrees of north latitude to the Duke of Lenox, the Marquis of Buckingham, and several others, in absolute property; and incorporated them under the name of "the council established at Plymouth, for planting and governing that country called New England;" with jurisdiction and powers similar to those which had before been conferred on the companies of south and north Virginia, and especially that of excluding all other persons whatever from trading within their boundaries and fishing in the neighbouring seas. This improvident grant, which excited the indignation of the people of England, then deeply interested in the fur trade and fisheries, soon engaged the attention, and received the censure of parliament. The patentees were compelled to relinquish their odious monopoly; and, being thus deprived of the funds on which they had relied to furnish the expense of supporting new settlements, they abandoned the design of attempting them. New England might have remained long unoccupied by Europeans, had not the same causes, which occasioned the emigration of the Brownists, still continued to operate. The persecution to which the puritans were exposed, increased their zeal and their numbers. In despair of obtaining at home a relaxation of those rigorous penal statutes under which they had long smarted, they looked elsewhere for that toleration which was denied them in their native land. Understanding that their brethren in New Plymouth were permitted to worship their creator according to the dictates of conscience, their attention was directed towards the same coast; and several small emigrations were made, at different times, to Massachusetts bay; so termed from the name of the Sachem who was sovereign of the country.

The original Plymouth Company, having failed to effectively settle the land they were given and unable to maintain their trade and fishing monopoly, asked James for a new and broader patent. On November 3rd, he granted the territory between the 40th and 48th degrees of north latitude to the Duke of Lenox, the Marquis of Buckingham, and several others, giving them absolute ownership. He formed them into "the council established at Plymouth, for planting and governing that country called New England," with similar jurisdiction and powers as those previously given to the South and North Virginia companies, especially the power to exclude everyone else from trading in their territory and fishing in nearby waters. This careless grant angered the people of England, who were deeply involved in the fur trade and fisheries, and soon attracted the attention and criticism of parliament. The patentees were forced to give up their hated monopoly, and without the financial support they had relied on to fund new settlements, they abandoned their plans. New England might have remained unoccupied by Europeans for a long time if not for the same reasons that had caused the Brownists to emigrate, which continued to affect them. The persecution faced by the Puritans fueled their passion and increased their numbers. Desperate for relief from the harsh penal laws they had endured for so long, they sought tolerance elsewhere, where it was denied to them at home. Learning that their fellow believers in New Plymouth could worship their creator according to their conscience, they turned their attention to the same coastline, and several small groups emigrated at different times to Massachusetts Bay, named after the Sachem who ruled the area.

1627

Mr. White, a non-conforming minister at Dorchester, formed an association of several gentlemen, who had imbibed puritanical opinions, for the purpose of conducting a colony to the bay of Massachusetts, and rendering it an asylum for the persecuted of his own persuasion. In prosecution of these views, a treaty was concluded with the council of Plymouth for the purchase of part of New England; Sir Henry Rosewell and others.and that corporation, in March 1627, sold to Sir Henry Rosewell and others, all that part of New England lying three miles to the south of Charles river, and three miles north of Merrimack river, and extending from the Atlantic to the South sea. A small number of planters and servants were, soon afterwards, dispatched under Endicot, who, in September, laid the foundation of Salem, the first permanent town in Massachusetts.[53]

Mr. White, a non-conforming minister in Dorchester, formed a group of several gentlemen who shared Puritan beliefs, aiming to establish a colony in the Massachusetts Bay as a refuge for others facing persecution like him. To pursue this goal, a deal was made with the Plymouth council to buy a portion of New England; Sir Henry Rosewell and others. In March 1627, that corporation sold to Sir Henry Rosewell and others all the land in New England located three miles south of the Charles River and three miles north of the Merrimack River, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the South Sea. Soon after, a small group of planters and servants was sent out under Endicot, who, in September, established Salem, the first permanent town in Massachusetts.[53]

The purchasers perceived their inability to accomplish the settlement of the extensive regions they had acquired, without the aid of more opulent partners. These were soon found in the capital; but they required that a new charter should be obtained from the crown, comprehending their names, which should confirm the grant to the council of Plymouth, and confer on the grantees the powers of government. So seldom is man instructed by the experience of others, that, disregarding the lessons furnished by Virginia, they likewise required that the supreme authority should be vested in persons residing in London. 1628The proprietors having acceded to these requisitions, application was made to Charles for a patent conforming to them, which issued on the 4th day of March, 1628.

The buyers realized they couldn't settle the large areas they had gotten without help from wealthier partners. They quickly found these partners in the capital, but they wanted a new charter from the crown that included their names, which would confirm the grant to the council of Plymouth and give the grantees governing powers. People rarely learn from the experiences of others, and ignoring the lessons from Virginia, they also insisted that the highest authority be given to people living in London. 1628The owners agreed to these demands, and a request was made to Charles for a patent that met these requirements, which was granted on March 4, 1628.

This charter incorporated the grantees by the name of "The governor and company of Massachusetts bay in New England."

This charter created the grantees under the name "The governor and company of Massachusetts Bay in New England."

The whole executive power was vested in a governor, a deputy governor, and eighteen assistants; to be named, in the first instance, by the crown, and afterwards elected by the company. The governor, and seven, or more, of the assistants, were authorised to meet in monthly courts, for the dispatch of such business as concerned the company, or settlement. The legislative power was vested in the body of the proprietors, who were to assemble four times a year in person, under the denomination of the general court; and besides electing freemen, and the necessary officers of the company, were empowered to make ordinances for the good of the community, and the government of the plantation and its inhabitants; provided they should not be repugnant to the laws of England. Their lands were to be holden in free and common soccage; and the same temporary exemption from taxes, and from duties on exports and imports, which had been granted to the colony of Virginia, was accorded to them. As in the charter of Virginia, so in this, the colonists and their descendants were declared to be entitled to all the rights and privileges of natural born subjects.

The entire executive power was held by a governor, a deputy governor, and eighteen assistants. Initially, these positions were appointed by the crown and later elected by the company. The governor, along with seven or more assistants, had the authority to meet in monthly courts to handle business relevant to the company or settlement. The legislative power was held by the group of proprietors, who gathered four times a year in person, known as the general court. They were responsible for electing freemen and necessary officers of the company, and were allowed to create ordinances for the benefit of the community and the governance of the plantation and its residents, as long as they didn’t conflict with English laws. Their lands were to be held in free and common soccage, and they were granted the same temporary tax exemptions and relief from duties on exports and imports that had been given to the colony of Virginia. Just like in the Virginia charter, the colonists and their descendants were stated to have all the rights and privileges of natural-born subjects.

The patent being obtained, the governor and council engaged with ardour in the duties assigned them. To support the expenses of a fresh embarkation, it was resolved that every person subscribing fifty pounds, should be entitled to two hundred acres of land as the first dividend. Five vessels sailed in May, carrying about two hundred persons, who reached Salem in June. At that place they found Endicot, to whom they brought a confirmation of his commission as governor. The colony consisted of three hundred persons, one hundred of whom removed to Charlestown.

The patent was obtained, and the governor and council eagerly engaged in their assigned duties. To cover the costs of a new expedition, it was decided that anyone contributing fifty pounds would be entitled to two hundred acres of land as the first reward. Five ships sailed in May, carrying about two hundred people, who arrived in Salem in June. There, they found Endicot, who they informed about the confirmation of his commission as governor. The colony consisted of three hundred people, one hundred of whom moved to Charlestown.

Religion, which had stimulated them to remove from their native land, became the first object of their care in the country they had adopted. Being zealous puritans, they concurred in the institution of a church, establishing that form of policy, which has since been denominated independent. A confession of faith was drawn up to which the majority assented; and an association was formed in which they covenanted with the Lord, and with each other, to walk together in all his ways, as he should be pleased to reveal himself to them. Pastors, and other ecclesiastical officers, were chosen, who were installed into their sacred offices, by the imposition of the hands of the brethren.[54]

Religion, which had inspired them to leave their homeland, became their top priority in the new country they had chosen. As passionate puritans, they agreed to set up a church, creating a system of governance that has since been called independent. A statement of faith was crafted that most of them accepted; and they formed a group in which they promised the Lord and each other to follow together in all his ways, as he chose to reveal himself to them. Pastors and other church leaders were selected, and they were officially installed into their roles through the laying on of hands by the members.[54]

A church being thus formed, several were received as members who gave an account of their faith and hope as Christians; and those only were admitted into the communion, whose morals and religious tenets were approved by the elders.[55]

A church was formed this way, and several people were accepted as members after sharing their faith and hope as Christians; only those whose morals and religious beliefs were approved by the elders were allowed to join the communion.[55]

Pleased with the work of their hands, and believing it to be perfect, they could tolerate no difference of opinion. Just escaped from persecution, they became persecutors themselves. Some few of their number, attached to the ritual of the church of England, were dissatisfied with its total abolition; and, withdrawing from communion with the church, met apart, to worship God in the manner they deemed most proper. At the head of this small number were two of the first patentees, who were also of the council. 1629They were called before the governor, who, being of opinion that their non-conformity and conversation tended to sedition, sent them to England. The opposition ceased when deprived of its leaders.[56]

Happy with their own achievements and convinced of their perfection, they couldn’t accept any differing opinions. Having just escaped persecution, they became persecutors themselves. A few among them, who valued the Church of England's rituals, were unhappy with its complete removal; they separated from the church and gathered independently to worship God in what they believed was the right way. Leading this small group were two of the original patentees, who were also on the council. 1629 They were summoned by the governor, who thought that their nonconformity and discussions could lead to rebellion, and sent them back to England. The opposition faded when its leaders were removed.[56]

The following winter brought with it the calamities which must be uniformly sustained by the first emigrants into a wilderness, where the cold is severe, and the privations almost universal. In the course of it, nearly half their number perished, "lamenting that they did not live to see the rising glories of the faithful." The fortitude, however, of the survivors, was not shaken; nor were their brethren in England deterred from joining them. Religion supported the colonists under all their difficulties; and the intolerant spirit of the English hierarchy diminished, in the view of the puritans in England, the dangers and the sufferings to be encountered in America; and disposed them to forego every other human enjoyment, for the consoling privilege of worshipping the Supreme Being according to their own opinions. Many persons of fortune determined to seek in the new world that liberty of conscience which was denied them in the old; but, foreseeing the misrule inseparable from the residence of the legislative power in England, they demanded, as preliminary to their emigration, that the powers of government should be transferred to New England, and be exercised in the colony. The company had already incurred expenses for which they saw no prospect of a speedy reimbursement; and although they doubted the legality of the measure, were well disposed by adopting it, to obtain such important aid. Government transferred to Massachusetts bay.A general court was therefore convened, by whom it was unanimously resolved "that the patent should be transferred, and the government of the colony removed from London to Massachusetts bay." It was also agreed that the members of the corporation remaining in England, should retain a share in the trading stock and profits for the term of seven years.[57]

The following winter brought severe challenges that the first settlers in a wilderness had to endure, where the cold was harsh and the hardships nearly universal. During this time, almost half of their group died, "regretting that they did not live to see the rising glories of the faithful." However, the determination of the survivors was unshaken, and their fellow believers in England were not discouraged from joining them. Religion helped the colonists through all their struggles; and the oppressive nature of the English hierarchy made the dangers and sufferings they would face in America seem less daunting to the Puritans in England, encouraging them to give up every other pleasure for the comforting right to worship the Supreme Being in their own way. Many wealthy individuals decided to seek the freedom of conscience that was denied to them in the old world. But, anticipating the mismanagement that would come with the legislative power remaining in England, they insisted that before they emigrated, the powers of government be transferred to New England and exercised in the colony. The company had already incurred expenses without any immediate hope of reimbursement, and even though they questioned the legality of this action, they were inclined to pursue it to gain crucial support. Government moved to Massachusetts Bay. A general court was therefore convened, and they unanimously resolved "that the patent should be transferred, and the government of the colony removed from London to Massachusetts bay." It was also agreed that the remaining members of the corporation in England would keep a share in the trading stock and profits for a period of seven years.[57]

1630

Such was the effect of this revolution in the system of government, that, early in the following year, fifteen hundred persons, among whom were several of family and fortune, embarked, at an expense of upwards of twenty thousand pounds, and arrived at Salem in July. Boston founded.Dissatisfied with this situation, they explored the country in quest of better stations; and, settling in many places around the bay, they laid the foundation of several towns, and, among others, of Boston.

Such was the impact of this change in the government system that, early the next year, fifteen hundred people, including several wealthy individuals, set sail, spending over twenty thousand pounds, and arrived in Salem in July. Boston established. Unhappy with their situation, they explored the area looking for better locations and settled in various places around the bay, establishing several towns, including Boston.

The difficulty of obtaining subsistence, the difference of their food from that to which they had been accustomed, the intense cold of the winter, against which sufficient provision was not yet made, were still severely felt by the colonists, and still carried many of them to the grave; but that enthusiasm which had impelled them to emigrate, preserved all its force; and they met, with a firm unshaken spirit, the calamities which assailed them. 1631Our admiration of their fortitude and of their principles, sustains, however, some diminution from observing the sternness with which they denied to others that civil and religious liberty which, through so many dangers and hardships, they sought for themselves. Their general court decreed that none should be admitted as freemen, or permitted to vote at elections, or be capable of being chosen as magistrates, or of serving as jurymen, but such as had been received into the church as members. Thus did men who had braved every hardship for freedom of conscience, deny the choicest rights of humanity, to all those who dissented from the opinion of the majority on any article of faith, or point of church discipline.

The struggle to find enough food, the differences in their diet compared to what they were used to, and the harsh winter cold, for which they had not adequately prepared, were still a heavy burden for the colonists, leading many of them to their deaths. However, the passion that drove them to migrate remained strong, and they faced the challenges that came their way with unwavering determination. 1631While we admire their resilience and principles, our respect is somewhat diminished by the severity with which they denied others the civil and religious freedoms they themselves sought through numerous trials and tribulations. Their general court ruled that only those who were accepted as church members could be regarded as freemen, allowed to vote in elections, eligible to be chosen as magistrates, or serve on juries. In this way, those who had endured countless hardships for the sake of conscience denied the fundamental rights of humanity to anyone who disagreed with the majority on any matter of faith or church governance.

The numerous complaints of the severities exercised by the government of Massachusetts, added to the immense emigration of persons noted for their enthusiasm, seem, at length, to have made some impression on Charles; 1633and an order was made by the King in council, to stop the ships at that time ready to sail, freighted with passengers for New England. This order, however, seems never to have been strictly executed, as the emigrations continued without any sensible diminution.

The many complaints about the harsh measures taken by the Massachusetts government, combined with the large migration of passionate individuals, seem to have finally affected Charles; 1633 and the King in council issued an order to halt the ships that were about to set sail, loaded with passengers for New England. However, this order doesn't seem to have been strictly enforced, as the migrations continued without any noticeable decline.

Hitherto the legislature had been composed of the whole body of the freemen. Under this system, so favourable to the views of the few who possess popular influence, the real power of the state had been chiefly engrossed by the governor and assistants, aided by the clergy. The emigration, however, having already been considerable, and the settlements having become extensive, it was found inconvenient, if not impracticable, longer to preserve a principle which their charter enjoined. 1634In the year 1634, by common consent, the people elected delegates who met the governor and council, and constituted the general court. This important improvement in their system, rendered familiar, and probably suggested, by the practice in the mother country, although not authorised by the charter, remained unaltered, so long as that charter was permitted to exist.[58]

Until now, the legislature had consisted of all the freemen. This system, which favored the interests of the few with popular influence, meant that real power in the state was mainly held by the governor and assistants, with support from the clergy. However, as emigration had already grown significantly and settlements had expanded, it became inconvenient, if not impossible, to maintain a principle mandated by their charter. 1634In 1634, by mutual agreement, the people elected delegates who convened with the governor and council to form the general court. This significant change in their system, likely inspired by practices in the mother country, although not authorized by the charter, remained intact for as long as that charter was allowed to exist.[58]

Commission for the government of the plantations.

The colony of Massachusetts having been conducted, from its commencement, very much on the plan of an independent society, at length attracted the partial notice of the jealous administration in England; 1635and a commission for "the regulation and government of the plantations" was issued to the great officers of state, and to some of the nobility, in which absolute power was granted to the archbishop of Canterbury and to others, "to make laws and constitutions concerning either their state public, or the utility of individuals." The commissioners were authorised to support the clergy by assigning them "tithes, oblations, and other profits, according to their discretion; to inflict punishment on those who should violate their ordinances; to remove governors of plantations, and to appoint others; and to constitute tribunals and courts of justice, ecclesiastical and civil, with such authority and form as they should think proper;" but their laws were not to take effect until they had received the royal assent, and had been proclaimed in the colonies. The commissioners were also constituted a committee to hear complaints against a colony, its governor or other officers, with power to remove the offender to England for punishment. They were farther directed to cause the revocation of such letters patent, granted for the establishment of colonies, as should, upon inquiry, be found to have been unduly obtained, or to contain a grant of liberties hurtful to the royal prerogative.[59]

The colony of Massachusetts had been run, from the beginning, very much like an independent society, which eventually caught the attention of the suspicious administration back in England; 1635 and a commission for "the regulation and government of the plantations" was given to the high-ranking officials and some nobles, granting absolute power to the archbishop of Canterbury and others "to create laws and rules regarding their public state or the welfare of individuals." The commissioners were authorized to support the clergy by assigning them "tithes, offerings, and other profits, as they saw fit; to punish those who broke their rules; to remove governors of plantations and appoint new ones; and to set up courts of justice, both ecclesiastical and civil, with whatever authority and structure they deemed appropriate;" but their laws wouldn’t go into effect until they received royal approval and had been announced in the colonies. The commissioners were also set up as a committee to handle complaints against a colony, its governor, or other officials, with the power to take offenders back to England for punishment. They were further instructed to revoke any letters patent that were found, upon investigation, to be improperly obtained or that granted liberties detrimental to the royal authority.[59]

From the first settlement at Salem, the colony of Massachusetts had cultivated the friendship of their neighbours of New Plymouth. The bonds of mutual amity were now rendered more strict, not only by some appearances of a hostile disposition among the natives, but by another circumstance which excited alarm in both colonies.

From the first settlement at Salem, the Massachusetts colony had built a friendly relationship with their neighbors in New Plymouth. The ties of mutual friendship became even stronger, not only because of some signs of hostility from the natives, but also due to another situation that raised concerns in both colonies.

The voyages for discovery and settlement, made by the English and French, to the coast of North America, having been nearly cotemporaneous, their conflicting claims soon brought them into collision with each other. The same lands were granted by the sovereigns of both nations; and, under these different grants, actual settlements had been made by the French as far south and west as St. Croix, and, by the English, as far north and east as Penobscot. During the war with France, which broke out early in the reign of Charles I., that monarch granted a commission to captain Kirk for the conquest of the countries in America occupied by the French; under which, in 1629, Canada and Acadié were subdued; but, by the treaty of St. Germains, those places were restored to France without any description of their limits; and Fort Royal, Quebec, and Cape Breton, were severally surrendered by name. In 1632, a party of French from Acadié committed a robbery on a trading house established at Penobscot by the people of New Plymouth. With the intelligence of this fact, information was also brought that cardinal Richelieu had ordered some companies to Acadié, and that more were expected the next year, with priests, Jesuits, and other formidable accompaniments, for a permanent settlement. The governor of Acadié established a military post at Penobscot, and, at the same time wrote to the governor of New Plymouth stating, that he had orders to displace the English as far as Pemaquid. Not being disposed to submit quietly to this invasion of territory, the government of New Plymouth undertook an expedition for the recovery of the fort at Penobscot, consisting of an English ship of war under the command of captain Girling, and a bark with twenty men belonging to the colony. The garrison received notice of this armament, and prepared for its reception by fortifying and strengthening the fort; in consequence of which Girling, after expending his ammunition and finding himself too weak to attempt the works by assault, applied to Massachusetts for aid. That colony agreed to furnish one hundred men, and to bear the expense of the expedition by private subscription; but a sufficient supply of provisions, even for this small corps, could not be immediately obtained, and the expedition was abandoned. Girling returned, and the French retained possession of Penobscot till 1654. The apprehensions entertained of these formidable neighbours contributed, in no small degree, to cement the union between Massachusetts and Plymouth.[60]

The exploration and settlement voyages by the English and French to the North American coast happened around the same time, and their competing claims quickly led to conflicts. Both nations' leaders granted the same lands, resulting in French settlements extending to St. Croix and English ones reaching Penobscot. During the war with France that started early in Charles I's reign, the king commissioned Captain Kirk to conquer the French-occupied territories in America. In 1629, Canada and Acadié were captured, but the Treaty of St. Germain returned these areas to France without defining their borders; Fort Royal, Quebec, and Cape Breton were specifically mentioned as surrendered. In 1632, a group of French from Acadié attacked a trading post established at Penobscot by the New Plymouth settlers. Along with this news, it was reported that Cardinal Richelieu had sent troops to Acadié and planned to send more, including priests and Jesuits, for permanent settlement. The governor of Acadié set up a military post at Penobscot and informed the New Plymouth governor that he had orders to push the English back to Pemaquid. Not wanting to accept this territorial invasion, New Plymouth's government launched an expedition to reclaim the fort at Penobscot, led by Captain Girling on an English warship and supported by a bark carrying twenty men from the colony. The garrison learned about this buildup and fortified the fort in preparation. As a result, after using up his ammunition and realizing he was too weak to assault the fort, Girling asked Massachusetts for help. The colony agreed to send one hundred men and cover the costs of the expedition through private donations; however, they couldn’t quickly secure enough supplies for even this small group, and the mission was called off. Girling returned, and the French held Penobscot until 1654. Concerns about these powerful neighbors played a significant role in strengthening the alliance between Massachusetts and Plymouth.[60]

Two persons, afterwards distinguished in English annals, arrived this year in Boston. One was Hugh Peters, the coadjutor and chaplain of Oliver Cromwell; the other was Mr. Henry Vane, the son of Sir Henry Vane, who was, at that time a privy councillor of great credit with the King. 1636The mind of this young gentleman was so deeply imbued with the political and religious opinions of the puritans, that he appeared ready to sacrifice, for the enjoyment of them, all his bright prospects in his native land. His mortified exterior, his grave and solemn deportment, his reputation for piety and wisdom, his strong professions of attachment to liberty and to the public good, added to his attention to some of the leading members in the church, won rapidly the affections of the people, and he was chosen their governor.

Two people, who would later be notable figures in English history, arrived in Boston this year. One was Hugh Peters, a collaborator and chaplain of Oliver Cromwell; the other was Mr. Henry Vane, the son of Sir Henry Vane, who was then a trusted privy councillor to the King. 1636 This young man was so immersed in the political and religious beliefs of the Puritans that he seemed willing to give up all his bright prospects in his home country for the sake of those beliefs. His humble appearance, serious demeanor, reputation for piety and wisdom, strong commitment to liberty and the public good, along with his attention to some of the church's leading members, quickly won the people's affection, and he was chosen as their governor.

His administration commenced with more external pomp than had been usual, or would seem to be congenial either with his own professions, or with the plain and simple manners of the people whom he governed. When going to court or church, he was always preceded by two sergeants who walked with their halberts. Yet his popularity sustained no diminution, until the part he took in the religious controversies of the country detached from him many of its most judicious inhabitants.[61]

His administration started with more external show than was typical, or seemed to fit either his own statements or the straightforward and simple ways of the people he governed. When going to court or church, he was always followed by two sergeants carrying halberds. Still, his popularity didn’t wane until his involvement in the country's religious debates drove away many of its most sensible residents.[61]

Independent of the meetings for public worship on every Sunday, of the stated lecture in Boston on every Thursday, and of occasional lectures in other towns, there were frequent meetings of the brethren of the churches, for religious exercises. Mrs. Hutchinson, who had been much flattered by the attentions of the governor, and of Mr. Cotton, one of the most popular of the clergy; who added eloquence to her enthusiasm, and whose husband was among the most respected men of the country; dissatisfied with the exclusion of her sex from the private meetings of the brethren, instituted a meeting of the sisters also, in which she repeated the sermons of the preceding Sunday, accompanied with remarks and expositions. These meetings were attended by a large number of the most respectable of her sex; and her lectures were, for a time, generally approved. At length she drew a distinction between the ministers through the country. She designated a small number as being under a covenant of grace; the others, as being under a covenant of works. Contending for the necessity of the former, she maintained that sanctity of life is no evidence of justification, or of favour with God; and that the Holy Ghost dwells personally in such as are justified. The whole colony was divided into two parties, equally positive, on these abstruse points, whose resentments against each other threatened the most serious calamities. Mr. Vane espoused, with zeal, the wildest doctrines of Mrs. Hutchinson, and Mr. Cotton decidedly favoured them. The lieutenant governor Mr. Winthrop, and the majority of the churches, were of the opposite party. Many conferences were held; days of fasting and humiliation were appointed; a general synod was called; and, after violent dissensions, Mrs. Hutchinson's opinions were condemned as erroneous, and she was banished. Many of her disciples followed her. Vane, in disgust, quitted America; unlamented even by those who had lately admired him. He was thought too visionary; and is said to have been too enthusiastic even for the enthusiasts of Massachusetts.

Outside of the weekly public worship every Sunday, the regular lecture in Boston every Thursday, and occasional lectures in other towns, there were often gatherings of the church members for religious activities. Mrs. Hutchinson, who had been quite flattered by the attention from the governor and Mr. Cotton, one of the most popular clergymen, who added persuasive speech to her passion, and whose husband was highly respected in the country; feeling unhappy about the exclusion of women from the private meetings of the church members, started a meeting for women as well, where she would repeat the sermons from the previous Sunday, along with her own comments and explanations. These meetings attracted a large number of respectable women, and her lectures were generally well-received for a while. Eventually, she differentiated between the ministers across the country. She categorized a small group as being under a covenant of grace; the rest as being under a covenant of works. Arguing for the necessity of the former, she asserted that a holy life does not prove justification or favor with God, and that the Holy Spirit lives personally in those who are justified. The entire colony split into two equally passionate factions on these complex issues, with their grievances against each other threatening serious consequences. Mr. Vane passionately supported Mrs. Hutchinson's most extreme beliefs, and Mr. Cotton openly endorsed them. The lieutenant governor, Mr. Winthrop, along with the majority of the churches, aligned with the opposing side. Numerous conferences took place; days of fasting and repentance were set; a general synod convened; and after intense disagreements, Mrs. Hutchinson's views were deemed erroneous, leading to her banishment. Many of her followers left with her. Vane, in frustration, departed from America; he was not missed even by those who had recently admired him. He was regarded as too idealistic and was said to be too passionate even for Massachusetts' enthusiasts.

The patentees, having no common object to prosecute, resolved to divide their lands; and, in the expectation of receiving a deed of confirmation for the particular portion which fortune should allot to each, cast lots, in the presence of James, for the shares each should hold in severalty. They continued, however, to act some years longer as a body politic, during which time, they granted various portions of the country to different persons; and executed under the seal of the corporation, deeds of feoffment for the lots drawn by each member of the company; patents of confirmation for which were solicited, but appear to have been granted only to Gorges, for Maine. The charter was surrendered by the company and accepted by the crown.[62]

The patent holders, lacking a shared goal to pursue, decided to split their land. They anticipated receiving a confirmation deed for the specific area that luck would assign to each person, so they drew lots in front of James to determine the individual shares. However, they continued to function as a political body for several more years, during which they granted different parts of the land to various people and issued deeds of ownership for the lots each member drew, using the corporation's seal. They requested confirmation patents for these deeds, but it seems only Gorges received one for Maine. The company surrendered the charter, which was then accepted by the crown.[62]

1637

Charles, in pursuance of his determination to take the government of New England into his own hands, issued a proclamation directing that none should be transported thither who had not the special license of the crown, which should be granted to those only who had taken the oaths of supremacy and allegiance, and had conformed to the discipline of the church of England. This order, however, could not be completely executed; and the emigrations, which were entirely of non-conformists, still continued. Those who were disgusted with the ceremonials rigidly exacted in England, estimated so highly the simple frame of church policy established in Massachusetts, that numbers surmounted every difficulty, to seek an asylum in this new Jerusalem. Among them were men of the first political influence and mental attainments. Pym, Hampden, Hazlerig, and Cromwell, with many others who afterwards performed a conspicuous part in that revolution which brought the head of Charles to the block, are said to have been actually on board a vessel prepared to sail for New England, and to have been stopped by the special orders of the privy council.[63]

Charles, determined to take control of New England, issued a proclamation stating that no one should be transported there without a special license from the crown. This license would only be granted to those who had taken oaths of supremacy and allegiance and conformed to the practices of the Church of England. However, this order couldn't be fully enforced, and emigrations, primarily by nonconformists, continued. Those who were disillusioned with the strict rituals demanded in England valued the simpler church policies established in Massachusetts so highly that many overcame various challenges to seek refuge in this new Jerusalem. Among them were influential political figures and intellectuals. It's said that Pym, Hampden, Hazlerig, and Cromwell, along with others who later played significant roles in the revolution that led to Charles's execution, were actually on board a ship ready to sail for New England but were stopped by direct orders from the privy council.[63]

1638

The commissioners for the regulation and government of the plantations having reported that Massachusetts had violated its charter, a writ of quo warranto was issued, on which judgment was given in favour of the crown. The process was never served on any member of the corporation; and it is therefore probable that the judgment was not final. The privy council however ordered the governor and company to send their patent to England to be surrendered. The general court answered this order by a petition to the commissioners in which they said, "we dare not question your Lordship's proceedings in requiring our patent to be sent unto you; we only desire to open our griefs; and if in any thing we have offended his Majesty or your Lordships, we humbly prostrate ourselves at the foot stool of supreme authority; we are sincerely ready to yield all due obedience to both; we are not conscious that we have offended in any thing, as our government is according to law; we pray that we may be heard before condemnation, and that we may be suffered to live in the wilderness." Fortunately for the colonists, Charles and his commissioners found too much employment at home, to have leisure for carrying into complete execution, a system aimed at the subversions of what was most dear to the hearts of Americans.

The commissioners regulating the plantations reported that Massachusetts had breached its charter, leading to a writ of quo warranto being issued, with the judgment favoring the crown. The process was never served on any member of the corporation; hence, it’s likely that the judgment was not final. However, the privy council ordered the governor and company to send their patent to England for surrender. In response, the general court submitted a petition to the commissioners stating, "we do not dare to question your Lordship's actions in demanding our patent; we only wish to express our concerns. If we have offended His Majesty or your Lordships in any way, we humbly submit ourselves at the feet of supreme authority; we are genuinely ready to comply with both; we do not believe we have done anything wrong, as our government operates according to law; we request to be heard before any judgment is made against us, and we ask to be allowed to continue living in the wilderness." Fortunately for the colonists, Charles and his commissioners had too much going on at home to fully carry out a plan that aimed at undermining what was most precious to the hearts of Americans.

To the religious dissensions which distracted Massachusetts, and to the rigour with which conformity was exacted, is to be attributed the first settlement of the other colonies of New England. As early as the year 1634, Roger Williams, a popular preacher at Salem, who had refused to hold communion with the church at Boston, because its members refused to make a public declaration of their repentance for having held communion with the church of England during their residence in that country, was charged with many exceptionable tenets. Among several which mark his wild enthusiasm, one is found in total opposition, to the spirit of the times and to the severity of his other doctrines. He maintained, that to punish a man for any matter of conscience is persecution, and that even papists and Arminians are entitled to freedom of conscience in worship, provided the peace of civil society be secured. The divines of Massachusetts, in opposition to this doctrine, contended that they did not persecute men for conscience, but corrected them for sinning against conscience; and so they did not persecute, but punish heretics. This unintelligible sophism not convincing Williams, he was, for this, and for his other heresies, banished by the magistrates, as a disturber of the peace of the church, and of the commonwealth.

To the religious disputes that troubled Massachusetts, and to the strictness with which conformity was enforced, we can attribute the initial establishment of the other New England colonies. As early as 1634, Roger Williams, a popular preacher in Salem, refused to engage with the church in Boston because its members wouldn’t publicly admit their repentance for having communed with the Church of England while living there. He was accused of holding many controversial beliefs. Among the various ideas that showcased his intense enthusiasm, one stood out in stark contrast to the prevailing spirit and the severity of his other doctrines. He argued that punishing someone for their beliefs is persecution, and that even Catholics and Arminians deserve freedom of conscience in worship, as long as civil peace is maintained. The religious leaders of Massachusetts countered this idea, insisting that they did not persecute anyone for their beliefs but corrected them for going against their conscience; therefore, they argued, they did not persecute but punished heretics. This confusing reasoning didn’t persuade Williams, and for his views and other heresies, he was banished by the magistrates as a disruptor of the peace of the church and the community.

 

Plymouth

Plymouth

Plymouth, Massachusetts, in 1622

Plymouth, MA, in 1622

From the painting by W.L. Williams

From the painting by W.L. Williams

Here, under Governor Bradford, who directed their destiny for a precarious quarter of a century, the Pilgrim Fathers strove desperately to maintain a foothold in America, and several times were on the point of abandoning the enterprise. To such straits were they reduced, in 1622, a year after the death of Governor Carter, that half rations were doled out, and when, in May of that year, a ship arrived from England bearing encouraging letters to the Pilgrims, but no substantial supplies, Governor Bradford remarked bitterly: "All this is but cold comfort to fill hungry bellies."

Under Governor Bradford, who guided them for a difficult twenty-five years, the Pilgrim Fathers fought hard to hold onto their place in America, and several times almost gave up on their mission. In 1622, a year after Governor Carter’s death, they were in such tough circumstances that they had to ration their food, and when a ship arrived from England in May with encouraging letters for the Pilgrims but no real supplies, Governor Bradford said bitterly: "This is just cold comfort for hungry stomachs."

 

Many of his disciples followed him into exile, and, travelling south until they passed the line of Massachusetts, purchased a tract of land of the Narraghansetts, then a powerful tribe of Indians, where, in 1635, Providence settled. they made a settlement to which they gave the name of Providence. After fixing the place of their future residence, they entered into a voluntary association, and framed a government composed of the whole body of freemen. After the manner of Massachusetts, they created a church by collecting a religious society; but, as one of the causes of their migration had been the tenet that all were entitled to freedom of conscience in worship, entire toleration was established. The new settlers cultivated with assiduity the good will of the natives, with whom a long peace was preserved.[64]

Many of his followers went with him into exile, and, traveling south until they crossed into Massachusetts, bought a piece of land from the Narragansetts, then a powerful Native American tribe, where, in 1635, Providence decided. they established a settlement named Providence. After deciding on the location of their new home, they formed a voluntary association and created a government made up of all the freemen. Similar to Massachusetts, they organized a church by gathering a religious community; however, since one of the reasons for their migration was the belief that everyone deserves freedom of conscience in worship, full toleration was implemented. The new settlers diligently cultivated goodwill with the natives, maintaining a long-lasting peace.[64]

The banishment of Williams was soon followed by that of Mrs. Hutchinson. Rhode Island settled.She was accompanied by many of her disciples, who, pursuing the steps of Williams, and, arriving in his neighbourhood, purchased a tract of land from the same tribe, and founded Rhode Island. Imitating the conduct of their neighbours, they formed a similar association for the establishment of civil government, and adopted the same principles of toleration. In consequence of this conduct the island soon became so populous as to furnish settlers for the adjacent shores.[65]

The exile of Williams was quickly followed by Mrs. Hutchinson's banishment. Rhode Island is settled. She was joined by many of her followers who, following Williams' example, arrived near him, bought a piece of land from the same tribe, and established Rhode Island. Mimicking their neighbors' approach, they set up a similar association for civil governance and embraced the same principles of tolerance. As a result of this approach, the island quickly became so populated that it provided settlers for the nearby shores.[65]

1634

Connecticut too is a colony of Massachusetts. As early as the year 1634, several persons, among whom was Mr. Hooker, a favourite minister of the church, applied to the general court of Massachusetts for permission to pursue their fortunes in some new and better land. This permission was not granted at that time; and, it being then the received opinion that the oath of a freeman, as well as the original compact, bound every member of the society so as not to leave him the right to separate himself from it without the consent of the whole, this emigration was suspended. The general court, however, did not long withhold its assent. Connecticut settled.The country having been explored, and a place selected on the west side of the river Connecticut, a commission was granted to the petitioners to remove, on the condition of their still continuing under the jurisdiction of Massachusetts, some few huts had been erected the preceding year in which a small number of emigrants had wintered; and, the fall succeeding, about sixty persons traversed the wilderness in families. 1636In 1636, about one hundred persons, led by Pynchon, Hooker, and Haynes, followed the first emigrants, and founded the towns of Hartford, Springfield, and Weathersfield. There are some peculiarities attending this commission and this settlement, which deserve to be noticed.

Connecticut was also a colony of Massachusetts. As early as 1634, several individuals, including Mr. Hooker, a beloved church minister, asked the general court of Massachusetts for permission to seek their fortunes in new and better land. This request was denied at that time; it was commonly believed that the oath of a freeman, along with the original agreement, bound every member of the society, meaning no one could separate themselves without the consent of all. As a result, this emigration was put on hold. However, the general court didn’t take long to give its approval. Connecticut reached an agreement. After exploring the area and selecting a site on the west side of the Connecticut River, the petitioners were granted permission to move, provided they remained under Massachusetts' jurisdiction. A few huts had been built the previous year where a small group of emigrants spent the winter. The following fall, around sixty people traveled through the wilderness in families. 1636 In 1636, about one hundred people, led by Pynchon, Hooker, and Haynes, followed the first group of emigrants and established the towns of Hartford, Springfield, and Weathersfield. There are some unique aspects of this commission and settlement that are worth noting.

The country to be settled was, confessedly, without the limits of Massachusetts; yet Roger Ludlow was authorised to promulgate the orders which might be necessary for the plantations; to inflict corporal punishment, imprisonment, and fines; to determine all differences in a judicial way; and to convene the inhabitants in a general court, if it should be necessary. This signal exercise of authority grew out of the principle, solemnly asserted by the general court of Massachusetts, that the oath of fidelity to the commonwealth was binding, although the person should no longer reside within its limits.

The area to be settled was, undoubtedly, outside the borders of Massachusetts; however, Roger Ludlow was given the authority to issue any necessary orders for the settlements, to impose corporal punishment, imprisonment, and fines, to resolve disputes in a judicial manner, and to gather the residents for a general meeting if needed. This significant use of power came from the principle, firmly stated by the Massachusetts general court, that the oath of loyalty to the commonwealth remained in effect even if a person no longer lived within its borders.

There were other difficulties attending the title of the settlers. The Dutch at Manhadoes, or New York, claimed a right to the river, as its first discoverers. In addition to this hostile title, Lord Say and Seal, and Lord Brooke, with some others, contemplating a retreat in the new world from the despotism with which England was threatened, had made choice of Connecticut river for that purpose, and had built a fort at its mouth, called Saybrooke. The emigrants from Massachusetts, however, kept possession; and proceeded to clear and cultivate the country. They purchased the rights of Lord Say and Seal, and Lord Brooke, and their partners; and the Dutch, being too feeble to maintain their title by the sword, gradually receded from the river. The emigrants, disclaiming the authority of Massachusetts, entered into a voluntary association for the establishment of a government, which, in its form, was like those established in the other colonies of New England. The principal difference between their constitution and that of Massachusetts was, that they imparted the right of freemen to those who were not members of the Church.[66]

There were other challenges regarding the settlers' claim. The Dutch in Manhadoes, now New York, insisted they had rights to the river as its first discoverers. On top of this competing claim, Lord Say and Seal, Lord Brooke, and a few others, looking to escape the tyranny looming over England, chose the Connecticut River for their new settlement and constructed a fort at its mouth called Saybrooke. However, the immigrants from Massachusetts maintained control and began to clear and farm the land. They bought the rights from Lord Say and Seal, Lord Brooke, and their partners, while the Dutch, unable to defend their claim, gradually withdrew from the river. The immigrants, rejecting Massachusetts' authority, formed a voluntary association to establish a government similar to those in other New England colonies. The main difference between their constitution and that of Massachusetts was that they granted the rights of freemen to those who were not church members.[66]

These new establishments gave great and just alarm to the Piquods, a powerful tribe of Indians on the south of Massachusetts. They foresaw their own ruin in this extension of the English settlements; and the disposition excited by this apprehension soon displayed itself in private murders, and other acts of hostility. With a policy suggested by a strong sense of danger, they sought a reconciliation with the Narraghansetts, their ancient enemies and rivals; and requested them to forget their long cherished animosities, and to co-operate cordially against a common enemy whose continuing encroachments threatened to overwhelm both in one common destruction. Noticing the rapid progress of the English settlements, they urged, with reason, that, although a present friendship subsisted between the Narraghansetts and the new comers, yet all, in turn, must be dispossessed of their country, and this dangerous friendship could promise no other good than the wretched privilege of being last devoured.

These new settlements created significant and justified concern for the Piquods, a powerful tribe of Native Americans in southern Massachusetts. They feared their own destruction due to the growth of English settlements, and this anxiety soon led to private murders and other acts of violence. Driven by a strong sense of danger, they sought to reconcile with the Narraghansetts, their long-time enemies and rivals. They asked the Narraghansetts to put aside their longstanding grievances and work together against a common threat that could lead to the destruction of both tribes. Observing the swift expansion of the English settlements, they pointed out that, while there was currently a friendly relationship between the Narraghansetts and the newcomers, ultimately everyone would lose their land, and this risky alliance could offer nothing more than the grim privilege of being the last to be consumed.

These representations could not efface from the bosoms of the Narraghansetts, that deep rooted enmity which neighbours, not bound together by ligaments of sufficient strength to prevent reciprocal acts of hostility, too often feel for each other. Dreading still less the power of a foreign nation, than that of men with whom they had been in the habit of contending, they not only refused to join the Piquods, but communicated their proposition to the government of Massachusetts, with whom they formed an alliance against that tribe. War with the Piquods.Open war being resolved on by both parties, Captain Underhill was sent to the relief of fort Saybrooke which had been besieged by the Indians; and the three colonies, Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Connecticut, agreed to march their united forces into the country of the Piquods, to effect their entire destruction. The troops of Connecticut were first in motion. Those of Massachusetts were detained by the controversy concerning the covenant of works, and of grace, which had insinuated itself into all the transactions of that colony. Their little army, when collected, found itself divided by this metaphysical point; and the stronger party, believing that the blessing of God could not be expected to crown with success the arms of such unhallowed men as their opponents in faith on this question, refused to march until their small band was purified by expelling the unclean, and introducing others whose tenets were unexceptionable.

These feelings couldn't erase from the hearts of the Narraghansetts that deep-rooted hostility which neighbors, not strongly bonded enough to stop mutual acts of aggression, often feel toward one another. Fearing less the power of a foreign nation than that of people they had frequently clashed with, they not only declined to ally with the Piquods but also informed the government of Massachusetts about the proposal, forming an alliance against that tribe. War with the Piquods. With both sides determined to go to war, Captain Underhill was sent to support Fort Saybrooke, which had been under siege by the Indians. The three colonies—Massachusetts, Plymouth, and Connecticut—agreed to combine their forces to completely destroy the Piquods. The Connecticut troops moved out first. The Massachusetts troops were delayed by a disagreement over the covenant of works and grace, which had crept into all matters of that colony. When their small army gathered, they found themselves divided over this philosophical issue; the stronger faction, believing that God’s blessing wouldn’t favor the success of such ungodly men as their opponents on this question, refused to move forward until their group was cleansed by removing the unworthy and bringing in others whose beliefs were accepted.

While this operation was performing, the troops of Connecticut, reinforced by a body of friendly Indians and by a small detachment from Saybrooke, determined to march against the enemy. The Piquods had taken two positions which they had surrounded with palisadoes, and had resolved to defend. The nearest was on a small eminence surrounded by a swamp near the head of Mystic river. Against this fort the first attack was made. The Indians, deceived by a movement of the vessels from Saybrooke to Narraghansett, believed the expedition to have been abandoned; and celebrated, in perfect security, the supposed evacuation of their country. About day-break, while they were asleep, the English approached, and the surprise would have been complete, had they not been alarmed by the barking of a dog. They immediately gave the war whoop, and flew undismayed to arms. The English rushed to the attack, forced their way through the works, and set fire to the Indian wigwams. The confusion soon became general, and almost every man was killed or taken.

While this operation was underway, the troops from Connecticut, supported by a group of friendly Indians and a small detachment from Saybrooke, decided to march against the enemy. The Pequot had taken two positions surrounded by palisades and had resolved to defend them. The closest was on a small rise surrounded by a swamp near the head of Mystic River. The first attack was made against this fort. The Indians, misled by a movement of the vessels from Saybrooke to Narragansett, believed the expedition had been called off and celebrated, in total safety, the supposed evacuation of their territory. Just before dawn, while they were asleep, the English approached, and the surprise would have been total, had they not been alerted by a barking dog. They instantly cried out the war whoop and fearlessly grabbed their weapons. The English rushed to the attack, broke through the defenses, and set fire to the Indian huts. The chaos quickly spread, and almost every man was killed or captured.

Soon after this action, the troops of Massachusetts arrived, and it was resolved to pursue the victory. Several skirmishes terminated unfavourably to the Piquods; and, in a short time, they received another total defeat, which put an end to the war. A few only of this once powerful nation survived, who, abandoning their country, dispersed themselves among the neighbouring tribes, and were incorporated with them.[67]

Soon after this event, the Massachusetts troops arrived, and it was decided to continue the victory. Several skirmishes ended badly for the Pequot; and soon after, they suffered another complete defeat, which brought the war to an end. Only a few members of this once powerful nation survived, who, leaving their homeland, scattered among the neighboring tribes and were absorbed into them.[67]

This vigorous essay in arms of the New England colonists impressed on the Indians a high opinion of their courage and military superiority; but their victory was sullied with cruelties which cannot be recollected without mingled regret and censure.

This strong essay about the New England colonists in battle impressed the Indians with a great opinion of their bravery and military strength; however, their victory was tainted by cruel actions that are remembered with mixed feelings of regret and criticism.

1638

Immediately after the termination of this war New Haven was settled.

Immediately after the end of this war, New Haven was established.

A small emigration from England conducted by Eaton and Davenport, arrived at Boston in June. Unwilling to remain where power and influence were already in the hands of others, they refused to continue within the jurisdiction of Massachusetts; New Haven settled.and, disregarding the threats at Manhadoes, settled themselves west of Connecticut river, on a place which they named New Haven. Their institutions, civil and ecclesiastical, were in the same spirit with those of their elder sister, Massachusetts.

A small group of immigrants from England led by Eaton and Davenport arrived in Boston in June. Not wanting to stay where power and influence were already controlled by others, they decided not to remain in Massachusetts; New Haven has settled. Ignoring the threats at Manhadoes, they settled west of the Connecticut River in a place they named New Haven. Their civil and religious institutions were in line with those of their older sister, Massachusetts.

The colony was now in a very flourishing condition. Twenty-one thousand two hundred emigrants had arrived from England; and, although they devoted great part of their attention to the abstruse points of theology which employed the casuists of that day, they were not unmindful of those solid acquisitions which permanently improve the condition of man. Sober, industrious, and economical, they laboured indefatigably in opening and improving the country, and were unremitting in their efforts to furnish themselves with those supplies which are to be drawn from the bosom of the earth. Of these, they soon raised a surplus for which fresh emigrants offered a profitable market; and their foreign trade in lumber, added to their fish and furs, furnished them with the means of making remittances to England for those manufactures which they found it advantageous to import. Their fisheries had become so important as to attract the attention of government. For their encouragement, a law was passed exempting property employed in catching, curing, or transporting fish, from all duties and taxes, and the fishermen, and ship builders, from militia duty. By the same law, all persons were restrained from using cod or bass fish for manure.

The colony was now thriving. Twenty-one thousand two hundred emigrants had arrived from England, and while they spent a lot of time on the complex issues of theology that engaged the scholars of that time, they didn't ignore the practical advancements that could genuinely improve people's lives. Diligent, hardworking, and frugal, they tirelessly worked to develop the land and were relentless in their quest for natural resources. Before long, they produced a surplus that attracted new emigrants willing to pay well for it, and their foreign trade in lumber, along with their fish and furs, provided them the means to send money back to England for goods they found beneficial to import. Their fishing industry grew so significant it caught the government’s attention. To support them, a law was enacted that exempted properties used for catching, processing, or transporting fish from all duties and taxes, and also relieved fishermen and shipbuilders from militia service. The same law prohibited anyone from using cod or bass for fertilizer.


CHAPTER IV.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine.... Dissensions among the inhabitants.... Confederation of the New England colonies.... Rhode Island excluded from it.... Separate chambers provided for the two branches of the Legislature.... New England takes part with Parliament.... Treaty with Acadié.... Petition of the non-conformists.... Disputes between Massachusetts and Connecticut.... War between England and Holland.... Machinations of the Dutch at Manhadoes among the Indians.... Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war.... Application of New Haven to Cromwell for assistance.... Peace with the Dutch.... Expedition of Sedgewic against Acadié.... Religious intolerance.

Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine.... Conflicts among the residents.... Confederation of the New England colonies.... Rhode Island is excluded from it.... Separate chambers are set up for the two branches of the Legislature.... New England aligns with Parliament.... Treaty with Acadié.... Petition from the non-conformists.... Disagreements between Massachusetts and Connecticut.... War between England and Holland.... Dutch intrigues at Manhadoes among the Indians.... Massachusetts refuses to join the united colonies in the war.... New Haven appeals to Cromwell for help.... Peace with the Dutch.... Sedgewic's expedition against Acadié.... Religious intolerance.

 

1639

The government of Massachusetts, induced by the rapidity with which the colony had attained its present strength to form sanguine hopes of future importance, instituted an inquiry into the extent of their patent, with a view to the enlargement of territory. To facilitate this object, commissioners were appointed to explore the Merrimack, and to ascertain its northernmost point. The charter conveyed to the grantees all the lands within lines to be drawn three miles south of Charles river, and the same distance north of the Merrimack. Massachusetts claims New Hampshire and part of Maine.The government construed this description as authorising a line to be drawn due east from a point three miles north of the head of Merrimack, which soon leaves that river, and includes all New Hampshire, and a considerable part of Maine. In pursuance of this exposition of the charter, the general court asserted its jurisdiction over New Hampshire, in which there were a few scattered habitations, and proceeded to authorise settlements in that country.[68]

The government of Massachusetts, spurred by how quickly the colony had grown to become powerful, began looking into the extent of their patent with the aim of expanding their territory. To help with this goal, they appointed commissioners to explore the Merrimack River and determine its furthest northern point. The charter granted the land within lines that were to be drawn three miles south of the Charles River and the same distance north of the Merrimack. Massachusetts asserts its claim over New Hampshire and a portion of Maine. The government interpreted this description as allowing for a line to be drawn straight east from a point three miles north of the head of the Merrimack, which quickly moves away from that river and encompasses all of New Hampshire and a large portion of Maine. Following this interpretation of the charter, the general court claimed jurisdiction over New Hampshire, where there were only a few scattered settlements, and moved forward with authorizing settlements in that area.[68]

The attempts which had been made to colonise the northern and eastern parts of New England had proved almost entirely unsuccessful. Sir Ferdinando Gorges and John Mason had built a small house at the mouth of Piscataqua, about the year 1623; and, nearly at the same time, others erected a few huts along the coast from Merrimack eastward to Sagadahock for the purpose of fishing. In 1631, Gorges and Mason sent over a small party of planters and fishermen under the conduct of a Mr. Williams, who laid the foundation of Portsmouth.

The efforts to colonize the northern and eastern regions of New England had mostly failed. Sir Ferdinando Gorges and John Mason built a small house at the mouth of Piscataqua around 1623; around the same time, others put up a few huts along the coast from Merrimack to Sagadahock for fishing. In 1631, Gorges and Mason sent a small group of planters and fishermen led by a Mr. Williams, who established the foundation of Portsmouth.

When the Plymouth company divided New England among its members, that territory lying along the coast from Merrimack river, and for sixty miles into the country to the river Piscataqua, was granted to Mason, and was called New Hampshire; that territory northeastward of New Hampshire, to the river Kennebec, and sixty miles into the country, was granted to Sir Ferdinando Gorges. In 1639, Gorges obtained a patent for this district under the name of Maine, comprehending the lands for one hundred, instead of sixty miles, into the country, together with the powers of sovereignty. He framed a system of government which, being purely executive, could not even preserve itself. After struggling with a long course of confusion, and drawing out, for several years, a miserable political existence, Maine submitted itself to the jurisdiction of Massachusetts, and consented to become a part of that colony. In the course of the years 1651 and 1652, this junction was effected, and Maine was erected into a county, the towns of which sent deputies to the general court at Boston. To this county was conceded the peculiar privilege that its inhabitants, although not members of the church, should be entitled to the rights of freemen on taking the oath.[69]

When the Plymouth company split up New England among its members, the area along the coast from the Merrimack River, extending sixty miles inland to the Piscataqua River, was given to Mason and named New Hampshire. The territory northeast of New Hampshire, up to the Kennebec River and sixty miles inland, was granted to Sir Ferdinando Gorges. In 1639, Gorges got a patent for this region under the name of Maine, which now included land extending one hundred miles inland, along with the powers of sovereignty. He created a system of government that was purely executive and ultimately couldn't sustain itself. After enduring a lengthy period of turmoil and a dismal political existence for several years, Maine agreed to be governed by Massachusetts and became part of that colony. This merger took place in 1651 and 1652, and Maine was designated a county, with towns sending representatives to the general court in Boston. This county was granted the unique privilege that its residents, even if they weren’t church members, could qualify for the rights of freemen by taking the oath.[69]

The settlements in New Hampshire, too, were maintaining only a doubtful and feeble existence, when they drew a recruit of inhabitants from the same causes which had peopled Rhode Island and Connecticut.

The settlements in New Hampshire were also barely surviving when they attracted new residents from the same reasons that had populated Rhode Island and Connecticut.

1637

In 1637, when Mrs. Hutchinson and other Antinomians were exiled, Mr. Wheelright, her brother in law, a popular preacher, was likewise banished. He carried with him a considerable number of his followers; and, just passing the north-eastern boundary of Massachusetts, planted the town of Exeter. These emigrants immediately formed themselves, according to the manner of New England, into a body politic for their own government.

In 1637, when Mrs. Hutchinson and other Antinomians were exiled, Mr. Wheelright, her brother-in-law and a popular preacher, was also banished. He took a significant number of his followers with him and, just after crossing the northeastern boundary of Massachusetts, established the town of Exeter. These emigrants immediately organized themselves, in the New England way, into a governing body for their community.

1640

A few persons arrived soon afterwards from England, and laid the foundation of the town of Dover. They also established a distinct government. Their first act proved to be the source of future discord. The majority chose one Underbill as governor; but a respectable minority was opposed to his election. To this cause of discontent was added another of irresistible influence. They were divided on the subject of the covenant of works, and of grace. These dissensions soon grew into a civil war, which was happily terminated by Williams, who was, according to the practice of small societies torn by civil broils, invited by the weaker party to its aid. He marched from Portsmouth at the head of a small military force; and, banishing the governor, and the leaders of the Antinomian faction, restored peace to this distracted village.

A few people arrived shortly after from England and laid the groundwork for the town of Dover. They also set up a separate government. Their first action became the source of future conflict. The majority chose a man named Underbill as governor, but a significant minority opposed his election. This source of dissatisfaction was compounded by another issue of great importance. They were divided over the concepts of the covenant of works and grace. These disagreements quickly escalated into a civil war, which was fortunately resolved by Williams, who was, as often happens in small communities torn by internal strife, invited by the weaker side to help. He marched from Portsmouth with a small military force; and, after ousting the governor and the leaders of the Antinomian faction, he restored peace to this troubled village.

Massachusetts had asserted a right over this territory. Her claim derived aid, not only from the factions which agitated these feeble settlements, but also from the uncertainty of the tenure by which the inhabitants held their lands. Only the settlers at Portsmouth had acquired a title from Mason; and the others were, consequently, unfriendly to his pretensions. These causes produced a voluntary offer of submission to the government of Massachusetts, which was accepted; and the general court passed an order, declaring the inhabitants of Piscataqua to be within their jurisdiction, with the privileges of participating in all their rights, and of being exempted from all "public charges, other than those which shall arise for, or among themselves, or from any action, or course that may be taken for their own good or benefit." Under the protecting wing of this more powerful neighbour, New Hampshire attained the growth which afterwards enabled her to stand alone; and long remembered with affection the benefits she had received.[70]

Massachusetts claimed authority over this territory. Its claim was supported not only by the groups that stirred up trouble in these struggling settlements, but also by the uncertainty around how the residents held their land. Only the settlers in Portsmouth had a title from Mason, so the others were generally hostile to his claims. These factors led to a voluntary offer to submit to the Massachusetts government, which was accepted; the general court then issued an order stating that the residents of Piscataqua would be under their jurisdiction, with the right to participate in all their rights, and to be exempt from any "public charges, other than those that arise for, or among themselves, or from any action, or course that may be taken for their own good or benefit." Under the protection of this stronger neighbor, New Hampshire developed in a way that eventually allowed it to be self-sufficient, and it held onto fond memories of the benefits it had received.[70]

Charles, environed with difficulties arising from his own misrule, was at length compelled to meet his Parliament; and, in November, the great council of the nation was again assembled. The circumstances which had caused such considerable emigrations to New England, existed no longer. The puritans were not only exempt from persecution, but became the strongest party in the nation; and, from this time, New England is supposed to have derived no increase of population from the parent state.[71]

Charles, surrounded by challenges from his own poor leadership, was finally forced to face his Parliament; and in November, the national assembly was convened once more. The reasons that had led to so many people moving to New England were no longer relevant. The Puritans were not only free from persecution, but they also became the dominant group in the country; from this point on, New England is thought to have received no further population growth from the mother country.[71]

Confederation of the New England colonies.

About the same period many evidences were given of a general combination of the neighbouring Indians against the settlements of New England; and apprehensions were also entertained of hostility from the Dutch at Manhadoes. A sense of impending danger suggested the policy of forming a confederacy of the sister colonies for their mutual defence; and so confirmed had the habit of self-government become since the attention of England was absorbed in her domestic dissensions, that it was not thought necessary to consult the parent state on this important measure. 1643After mature deliberation, articles of confederation were digested; and in May 1643, they were conclusively adopted.[72]

Around the same time, there were many signs of a general alliance among the nearby Native Americans against the settlements in New England; there were also worries about potential hostility from the Dutch in Manhattan. A feeling of looming danger led to the idea of creating a confederation of the sister colonies for their mutual defense; and the practice of self-government had become so established since England was preoccupied with its own internal conflicts that it didn't seem necessary to consult the parent state about this crucial decision. 1643 After careful consideration, articles of confederation were drafted, and in May 1643, they were officially adopted.[72]

By them the united colonies of New England, viz. Massachusetts, Plymouth, Connecticut, and New Haven, entered into a firm and perpetual league, offensive and defensive.

By them, the united colonies of New England, namely Massachusetts, Plymouth, Connecticut, and New Haven, entered into a strong and lasting alliance, both for offense and defense.

Each colony retained a distinct and separate jurisdiction; no two colonies could join in one jurisdiction without the consent of the whole; and no other colony could be received into the confederacy without the like consent.

Each colony maintained its own distinct and separate authority; no two colonies could come together under one authority without the agreement of all; and no other colony could join the federation without the same agreement.

The charge of all wars was to be borne by the colonies respectively, in proportion to the male inhabitants of each, between sixteen and sixty years of age.

The cost of all wars was to be shared by the colonies based on the number of male residents aged between sixteen and sixty in each colony.

On notice of an invasion given by three magistrates of any colony, the confederates were immediately to furnish their respective quotas. These were fixed at one hundred from Massachusetts, and forty-five from each of the other parties to the agreement. If a larger armament should be found necessary, commissioners were to meet, and ascertain the number of men to be required.

On being informed of an invasion by three magistrates from any colony, the confederates were to immediately provide their respective contributions. These were set at one hundred from Massachusetts and forty-five from each of the other parties to the agreement. If a larger force was deemed necessary, commissioners would meet to determine the number of men needed.

Two commissioners from each government, being church members, were to meet annually on the first Monday in September. Six possessed the power of binding the whole. Any measure approved by a majority of less than six was to be referred to the general court of each colony, and the consent of all was necessary to its adoption.

Two commissioners from each government, who were members of the church, were scheduled to meet every year on the first Monday in September. Six had the authority to bind the entire group. Any measure approved by a majority of fewer than six would be sent to the general court of each colony, and the agreement of all was required for its adoption.

They were to choose annually a president from their own body, and had power to frame laws or rules of a civil nature, and of general concern. Of this description were rules which respected their conduct towards the Indians, and measures to be taken with fugitives from one colony to another.

They were to select a president from their own group each year and had the authority to create laws or regulations of a civil nature that applied to everyone. This included rules about how they should interact with the Indians and steps to be followed for fugitives moving from one colony to another.

No colony was permitted, without the general consent, to engage in war, but in sudden and inevitable cases.

No colony was allowed to go to war without general agreement, except in urgent and unavoidable situations.

If, on any extraordinary meeting of the commissioners, their whole number should not assemble, any four who should meet were empowered to determine on a war, and to call for the respective quotas of the several colonies; but not less than six could determine on the justice of the war, or settle the expenses, or levy the money for its support.

If, at any special meeting of the commissioners, not all of them show up, any four who do meet can decide on going to war and can request the contributions from the various colonies; however, at least six need to agree on the fairness of the war, or manage the expenses, or collect the funds needed to support it.

If any colony should be charged with breaking an article of the agreement, or with doing an injury to another colony, the complaint was to be submitted to the consideration and determination of the commissioners of such colonies as should be disinterested.[73]

If any colony is found to have violated a part of the agreement or harmed another colony, the complaint would be submitted for review and resolution by the commissioners from the unaffected colonies.[73]

This union, the result of good sense, and of a judicious consideration of the real interests of the colonies, remained in force until their charters were dissolved. Rhode Island excluded from it.Rhode Island, at the instance of Massachusetts, was excluded; and her commissioners were not admitted into the congress of deputies which formed the confederation.

This union, resulting from common sense and careful consideration of the real interests of the colonies, remained in effect until their charters were revoked. Rhode Island is not included. Rhode Island, at the request of Massachusetts, was excluded, and its representatives were not allowed into the congress of deputies that created the confederation.

On her petitioning at a subsequent period to be received as a member, her request was refused, unless she would consent to be incorporated with Plymouth. This condition being deemed inadmissible, she never was taken into the confederacy. From the formation of this league, its members were considered by their neighbours as one body with regard to external affairs, and such as were of general concern; though the internal and particular objects of each continued to be managed by its own magistrates and legislature.

On her later request to be accepted as a member, her application was denied unless she agreed to join Plymouth. Since this condition was seen as unacceptable, she was never included in the group. After the formation of this league, its members were viewed by their neighbors as a single entity regarding external issues and matters of common interest; however, the internal and specific affairs of each were still handled by their own officials and governing bodies.

The vigorous and prudent measures pursued by the united colonies, disconcerted the plans of the Indians, and preserved peace.

The strong and careful actions taken by the united colonies upset the Indians' plans and maintained peace.

Rhode Island and Providence plantations, excluded from the general confederacy, were under the necessity of courting the friendship of the neighbouring Indians. So successful were their endeavours that, in the year 1644, they obtained from the chiefs of the Narraghansetts a formal surrender of their country.[74]

Rhode Island and Providence plantations, left out of the general alliance, had to seek the goodwill of the nearby Native Americans. They were so successful in their efforts that, in 1644, they secured a formal cession of land from the leaders of the Narragansetts.[74]

The first general assembly, consisting of the collective freemen of the plantations, was convened in May, 1647. In this body the supreme authority of the nation resided. The executive duties were performed by a governor and four assistants, chosen from among the freemen by their several towns; and the same persons constituted also the supreme court for the administration of justice. Every township, forming within itself a corporation, elected a council of six, for the management of its peculiar affairs, and for the settlement of its disputes.[75]

The first general assembly, made up of all the free men from the plantations, was held in May 1647. This assembly had the highest authority in the nation. The executive functions were carried out by a governor and four assistants, who were selected from the freemen by their respective towns. These same individuals also served as the highest court for administering justice. Each township, acting as its own corporation, elected a council of six to handle its specific affairs and resolve disputes.[75]

1644

Hitherto the governor, assistants, and representatives, of Massachusetts had assembled in the same chamber, and deliberated together. At first their relative powers do not seem to have been accurately understood; nor the mode of deciding controverted questions to have been well defined. The representatives being the most numerous body, contended that every question should be decided by a majority of the whole, while the assistants asserted their right to a negative. More than once, this contest suspended the proceedings of the general court. But the assistants having, with the aid of the clergy, succeeded on each occasion, the representatives yielded the point, and moved that separate chambers should be provided for the two branches of the legislature. This motion being carried in the affirmative, their deliberations were afterwards conducted apart from each other.

Until now, the governor, assistants, and representatives of Massachusetts gathered in the same room and discussed matters together. Initially, their respective powers didn't seem to be clearly understood, nor was there a well-defined method for resolving disputed issues. The representatives, being the larger group, argued that every question should be decided by a majority of all members, while the assistants claimed their right to veto decisions. This disagreement caused delays in the general court's proceedings multiple times. However, the assistants, with support from the clergy, succeeded each time, leading the representatives to concede and propose that separate chambers be established for the two branches of the legislature. This proposal was approved, and from then on, their discussions were held separately.

This regulation was subsequently modified with respect to judicial proceedings; for the legislature was the court of the last resort. If, in these, the two houses differed, the vote was to be taken conjointly.

This regulation was later updated concerning judicial proceedings; the legislature was the final court of appeal. If the two houses disagreed, the vote was to be taken together.

New England takes part with Parliament.

In England, the contests between the King and Parliament, at length ripened into open war. The colonies of New England took an early and sincere part on the side of Parliament. Their interests were committed to such agents as might best conciliate the favour of the House of Commons, who, in return, manifested the impression received from them, and from the general conduct of their northern colonies, by passing a resolutions exempting from the payment of "duties or other customs," until the house should order otherwise, all merchandises exported to or from New England.[76] And, in 1644, the general court passed an ordinance declaring "that what person soever shall by word, writing, or action, endeavour to disturb our peace directly or indirectly by drawing a party under pretence that he is for the King of England, and such as join with him against the Parliament, shall be accounted as an offender of a high nature against this commonwealth, and to be proceeded with either capitally or otherwise, according to the quality and degree of his offence; provided always that this shall not be extended against any merchants, strangers and shipmen that come hither merely for trade or merchandise, albeit they should come from any of those parts that are in the hands of the King, and such as adhere to him against the Parliament; carrying themselves here quietly, and free from railing, or nourishing any faction, mutiny, or sedition among us as aforesaid."[77]

In England, the disputes between the King and Parliament eventually escalated into open conflict. The New England colonies quickly and genuinely sided with Parliament. They relied on representatives who could best gain the favor of the House of Commons, which, in turn, showed its support by passing resolutions that exempted all goods exported to or from New England from “duties or other customs” until otherwise ordered by the House.[76] In 1644, the General Court enacted a rule stating that anyone who tries to disturb our peace, whether openly or secretly, by rallying support for the King of England and those who side with him against Parliament, will be treated as a serious offender against this commonwealth. They will face consequences, which could be severe or otherwise, depending on the nature and severity of their actions. However, this rule will not apply to any merchants, foreigners, or sailors who come here solely for trade or commerce, even if they come from areas controlled by the King and his supporters, as long as they behave peacefully and do not incite any factions, riots, or rebellions among us.[77]

These manifestations of mutual kindness were not interrupted by an ordinance of Parliament, passed in 1643, appointing the earl of Warwick, governor in chief and lord high admiral of the colonies, with a council of five peers, and twelve commoners, to assist him; and empowering him, in conjunction with his associates, to examine the state of their affairs; to send for papers and persons; to remove governors and officers, appointing others in their places; and to assign over to them such part of the powers then granted as he should think proper. Jealous as were the people of New England of measures endangering their liberty, they do not appear to have been alarmed at this extraordinary exercise of power. So true is it that men close their eyes on encroachments committed by that party to which they are attached, in the delusive hope that power, in such hands, will always be wielded against their adversaries, never against themselves.

These acts of mutual kindness weren't disrupted by a law passed by Parliament in 1643, which appointed the Earl of Warwick as the chief governor and high admiral of the colonies. He was supported by a council made up of five peers and twelve commoners, who helped him oversee their affairs. This law gave him the authority to examine their situations, summon documents and individuals, remove governors and officials, appoint others to take their place, and delegate parts of the powers granted to him as he saw fit. Although the people of New England were wary of actions that threatened their freedom, they didn’t seem to be concerned about this unusual display of power. It’s true that people often overlook encroachments by the group they support, mistakenly believing that power in those hands will always be used against their opponents, not against themselves.

This prosperous state of things was still farther improved by a transaction which is the more worthy of notice as being an additional evidence of the extent to which the colonies of New England then exercised the powers of self-government. Treaty with Acadié.A treaty of peace and commerce was entered into between the governor of Massachusetts, styling himself governor of New England, and Monsieur D'Aulney, lieutenant general of the King of France in Acadié. This treaty was laid before the commissioners for the colonies and received their sanction.

This prosperous situation was further enhanced by an event that deserves attention as it shows how much the New England colonies were exercising their self-governing powers. Treaty with Acadia. A peace and commerce treaty was established between the governor of Massachusetts, who referred to himself as the governor of New England, and Monsieur D'Aulney, the lieutenant general of the King of France in Acadié. This treaty was presented to the commissioners of the colonies and received their approval.

1646

The rigid adherence of Massachusetts to the principle of withholding the privilege of a freeman from all who dissented from the majority in any religious opinion, could not fail to generate perpetual discontents. Petition of the non-conformists.A petition was presented to the general court, signed by several persons highly respectable for their situation and character, but, not being church members, excluded from the common rights of society, complaining that the fundamental laws of England were not acknowledged by the colony; and that they were denied those civil and religious privileges to which they were entitled, as freeborn Englishmen, of good moral conduct. Their prayer to be admitted to the rights, or to be relieved from the burdens, of society, was accompanied with observations conveying a very intelligible censure on the proceedings of the colony, and a threat of applying to Parliament, should the prayer of their petition be rejected.

Massachusetts's strict enforcement of excluding anyone who disagreed with the majority on religious matters from the rights of a freeman inevitably led to ongoing dissatisfaction. Petition of the nonconformists.A petition was submitted to the general court, signed by several respected individuals based on their status and character, but since they were not church members, they were excluded from the common rights of society. They complained that the fundamental laws of England were not recognized by the colony and that they were denied the civil and religious privileges they were entitled to as freeborn Englishmen of good moral character. Their request to gain rights or to be relieved of societal burdens included remarks that clearly criticized the colony’s actions and indicated a threat to seek intervention from Parliament if their petition was denied.

The most popular governments not being always the most inclined to tolerate opinions differing from those of the majority, this petition gave great offence, and its signers were required to attend the court. Their plea, that the right to petition government was sacred, was answered by saying that they were not accused for petitioning, but for using contemptuous and seditious expressions. They were required to find sureties for their good behaviour; and, on refusing to acknowledge their offence, were fined at the discretion of the court. An appeal from this decision having been refused, they sent deputies to lay their case before Parliament; but the clergy exerted themselves on the occasion; and the celebrated Cotton, in one of his sermons, asserted "that if any should carry writings or complaints against the people of God in that country to England, it would be as Jonas in the ship." A storm having risen during the passage, the mariners, impressed with the prophecy of Cotton, insisted that the obnoxious papers should be thrown overboard; and the deputies were constrained to consign their credentials to the waves. On their arrival in England, they found Parliament but little disposed to listen to their complaints. The agents of Massachusetts had received instructions to counteract their efforts; and the governments of New England were too high in favour, to admit of a rigid scrutiny into their conduct.[78]

The most popular governments aren’t always the most open to opinions that differ from the majority, so this petition caused a lot of offense, and its signers had to appear in court. Their argument that the right to petition the government was sacred was met with the response that they weren’t being accused of petitioning, but rather for using disrespectful and rebellious language. They were told to find sureties for their good behavior, and when they refused to acknowledge their wrongdoing, they were fined at the court's discretion. After their appeal was denied, they sent representatives to present their case to Parliament, but the clergy worked hard against them; the famous Cotton, in one of his sermons, claimed "that if anyone were to take writings or complaints against the people of God in that country to England, it would be like Jonas in the ship." A storm arose during the journey, and the sailors, convinced by Cotton's prophecy, demanded that the objectionable papers be thrown overboard, forcing the representatives to discard their credentials into the sea. When they arrived in England, they found Parliament not very willing to hear their complaints. The agents from Massachusetts had received orders to undermine their efforts, and the governments of New England were too well-regarded to allow for a thorough examination of their actions.[78]

In some of the internal dissensions which agitated Massachusetts, Winthrop, a man of great influence, always among their first magistrates, and often their governor, was charged while deputy governor with some arbitrary conduct. He defended himself at the bar, in the presence of a vast concourse of people; and, having been honourably acquitted, addressed them from the bench, in a speech which was highly approved.

In the midst of some internal conflicts that shook Massachusetts, Winthrop, a highly influential figure who was consistently among their top magistrates and frequently their governor, faced accusations of acting arbitrarily while serving as deputy governor. He defended himself publicly in front of a large crowd and, after being honorably acquitted, spoke to them from the bench in a speech that was very well received.

As this speech tends to illustrate the political opinions of the day, an extract from it may not be unworthy of regard. "The questions," he said, "which have troubled the country of late, and from which these disturbances in the state have arisen, have been about the authority of the magistrate and the liberty of the people. Magistracy is certainly an appointment from God. We take an oath to govern you according to God's law, and our own; and if we commit errors, not willingly, but for want of skill, you ought to bear with us, because, being chosen from among yourselves, we are but men, and subject to the like passions as yourselves. Nor would I have you mistake your own liberty. There is a freedom of doing what we list, without regard to law or justice; this liberty is indeed inconsistent with authority; but civil, moral, and federal liberty, consists in every man's enjoying his property, and having the benefit of the laws of his country; which is very consistent with a due subjection to the civil magistrate. And for this you ought to contend, with the hazard of your lives."[79]

As this speech illustrates the political views of the time, a part of it might be worth considering. "The issues," he said, "that have troubled the country lately, leading to these disturbances in the state, revolve around the authority of the magistrate and the freedom of the people. The magistracy is indeed a role appointed by God. We take an oath to govern you according to God's law and our own; and if we make mistakes, not out of intention but due to lack of skill, you should bear with us, because we are chosen from among you, we are just people, and we share the same passions as you do. Also, don’t confuse your own freedom. There is a freedom to do whatever we want, without regard to law or justice; this kind of freedom is actually incompatible with authority. However, civil, moral, and federal liberty means that every person should enjoy their property and benefit from the laws of their country, which is entirely consistent with proper submission to the civil magistrate. And for this, you should fight, even at the risk of your lives."[79]

During the remnant of his life, he was annually chosen governor.

During the rest of his life, he was elected governor every year.

1649

About this time, a controversy which had long subsisted between Massachusetts, and Connecticut, was terminated. The latter, for the purpose of maintaining Saybrooke, had laid a duty on all goods exported from Connecticut river. The inhabitants of Springfield, a town of Massachusetts lying on the river, having refused to pay this duty, the cause was laid before the commissioners of the united colonies; and, after hearing the parties, those of Plymouth and New Haven adjourned the final decision of the case until the next meeting, in order to hear farther objections from Massachusetts, but directed that, in the meantime, the duty should be paid.

Around this time, a long-standing dispute between Massachusetts and Connecticut was resolved. Connecticut had imposed a tax on all goods exported from the Connecticut River to support Saybrook. The residents of Springfield, a town in Massachusetts along the river, refused to pay this tax, so the issue was brought before the commissioners of the united colonies. After listening to both sides, the representatives from Plymouth and New Haven decided to postpone the final decision until their next meeting to hear further objections from Massachusetts, but instructed that, in the meantime, the tax should be paid.

At the meeting in 1648, Massachusetts insisted on the production of the patent of Connecticut. It was perfectly well known that the original patent could not be procured; and the agents for Connecticut, after stating this fact, offered an authentic copy. The commissioners recommended that the boundary line should be run, to ascertain whether Springfield was really in Massachusetts, but still directed that the duty should continue to be paid. On this order being made, the commissioners of Massachusetts produced a law of their general court, reciting the controversy, with the orders which had been made in it, and imposing a duty on all goods belonging to the inhabitants of Plymouth, Connecticut, or New Haven, which should be imported within the castle, or exported from any part of the bay, and subjecting them to forfeiture for non-payment. The commissioners remonstrated strongly against this measure, and recommended it to the general court of Massachusetts, seriously to consider whether such proceedings were reconcilable with "the law of love," and the tenor of the articles of confederation. In the meantime, they begged to be excused from "all farther agitations concerning Springfield."

At the meeting in 1648, Massachusetts insisted on seeing Connecticut's patent. Everyone knew that the original patent couldn't be obtained, so the representatives for Connecticut, after explaining this, offered an authentic copy. The commissioners suggested that a boundary line should be established to determine if Springfield was truly part of Massachusetts, but still instructed that the duty should continue to be paid. Once this order was made, the commissioners of Massachusetts presented a law from their general court outlining the controversy, the orders that had been issued regarding it, and imposing a duty on all goods belonging to the residents of Plymouth, Connecticut, or New Haven when imported into the castle or exported from any part of the bay, subjecting those goods to forfeiture for non-payment. The commissioners strongly opposed this measure and recommended to the Massachusetts general court that they seriously consider whether such actions were consistent with "the law of love" and the principles of the articles of confederation. In the meantime, they requested to be excused from "any further discussions about Springfield."

In this state of the controversy fort Saybrooke was consumed by fire, and Connecticut forbore to re-build it, or to demand the duty. In the following year, Massachusetts repealed the ordinance which had so successfully decided the contest.[80]

In the midst of the controversy, Fort Saybrooke was destroyed by fire, and Connecticut chose not to rebuild it or to insist on the duty. The next year, Massachusetts repealed the ordinance that had effectively resolved the dispute.[80]

Thus does a member of a confederacy, feeling its own strength, and the weakness of those with whom it is associated, deride the legitimate decisions of the federal body, when opposed to its own interest or passions, and obey the general will, only when that will is dictated by itself.

Thus, a member of a confederation, aware of its own strength and the weaknesses of those it is associated with, mocks the legitimate decisions of the federal body when they conflict with its own interests or desires, and follows the general will only when that will aligns with its own.

Although, while civil war raged in the mother country, New England had been permitted to govern itself as an independent nation, Parliament seems to have entertained very decisive opinions respecting the subordination of the provinces, and its own controlling power. The measures taken for giving effect to these opinions, involved all the colonies equally. The council of state was authorised to displace governors and magistrates, and to appoint others. Massachusetts was required to take a new patent, and to hold its courts, not in the name of the colony, but in the name of the Parliament. 1651The general court, unwilling to comply with these requisitions, transmitted a petition to Parliament, styling that body "the supreme authority," and expressing for it the highest respect. They stated their uniform attachment to Parliament during the civil war, the aid they had given, and the losses they had sustained. After speaking of the favours they had received, they expressed the hope "that it will not go worse with them than it did under the late King; and that the frame of this government will not be changed, and governors and magistrates imposed on them against their will." They declared, however, their entire submission to the will of Parliament; and, avowing for that body the most zealous attachment, prayed a favourable answer to their humble petition.

Although civil war was raging in the mother country, New England had been allowed to govern itself like an independent nation. Parliament, however, seemed to hold strong views about the control of the provinces and its own authority over them. The actions taken to enforce these views affected all the colonies. The council of state was authorized to remove governors and magistrates and appoint new ones. Massachusetts was required to obtain a new charter and hold its courts not in the name of the colony but in the name of Parliament. 1651 The general court, reluctant to follow these demands, sent a petition to Parliament, referring to it as "the supreme authority" and expressing their utmost respect. They highlighted their loyalty to Parliament throughout the civil war, the support they provided, and the losses they endured. After mentioning the benefits they had received, they hoped "that things will not turn out worse for them than they did under the late King; and that the structure of this government will not be altered, nor will governors and magistrates be imposed upon them against their will." They affirmed their complete submission to Parliament's will and, expressing deep loyalty to that body, requested a positive response to their humble petition.

But the united colonies had lately given great umbrage by supplying Virginia and Barbadoes, then enemies of the commonwealth, with warlike stores and other commodities. It was also matter of real complaint that their exemption from the payment of duties enabled them to enrich themselves at the expense of others; and a revocation of their privileges in this respect was seriously contemplated. Yet the requisitions concerning their charter were never complied with, and do not appear to have been repeated.[81]

But the united colonies had recently caused a lot of anger by supplying Virginia and Barbados, who were enemies of the commonwealth, with military supplies and other goods. There was also a real complaint that their exemption from paying duties allowed them to make profits at the cost of others; a revocation of their privileges in this regard was seriously considered. However, the demands about their charter were never met, and it doesn't seem like they were brought up again.[81]

In this year, war was declared by England against Holland. The united colonies, accustomed to conduct their affairs in their own way, did not think themselves involved in this contest, unless engaged in it by some act of their own. The Dutch at Manhadoes, too weak to encounter their English neighbours, solicited the continuance of peace; and, as the trade carried on between them was mutually advantageous, this request was readily granted. 1653Machinations of the Dutch with the Indians.Intelligence however was soon brought by the Indians, that the Dutch were privately inciting them to a general confederacy for the purpose of extirpating the English. This intelligence gave the more alarm, because the massacre at Amboyna was then fresh in the recollection of the colonists. An extraordinary meeting of the commissioners was called at Boston, who were divided in opinion with regard to the propriety of declaring war. In consequence of this division, a conference was held before the general court and several elders of Massachusetts. The elders, being requested to give their opinion in writing, stated "that the proofs and presumptions of the execrable plot, tending to the destruction of so many of the dear saints of God, imputed to the Dutch governor, and the fiscal, were of such weights as to induce them to believe the reality of it; yet they were not so fully conclusive as to clear up a present proceeding to war before the world, and to bear up their hearts with that fullness of persuasion which was mete, in commending the case to God in prayer, and to the people in exhortations; and that it would be safest for the colonies to forbear the use of the sword; but advised to be in a posture of defence until the mind of God should be more fully known either for a settled peace, or more manifest grounds of war."[82] With this opinion of the elders, the vote of the general court concurred.

This year, England declared war on Holland. The united colonies, used to managing their own affairs, believed they weren't involved in this conflict unless they took action themselves. The Dutch at Manhadoes, too weak to confront their English neighbors, sought to maintain peace; since their trade was beneficial for both sides, this request was quickly accepted. 1653Dutch interactions with the Indians. However, the Indians soon reported that the Dutch were secretly encouraging them to form a general alliance to eliminate the English. This news was particularly alarming because the massacre at Amboyna was still fresh in the colonists' minds. An emergency meeting of the commissioners was called in Boston, where they disagreed on whether to declare war. Due to this split opinion, a conference was held with the general court and several elders of Massachusetts. When asked for their written opinion, the elders stated that the evidence suggesting a terrible plot aimed at the destruction of many of God's beloved saints, attributed to the Dutch governor and fiscal, was significant enough to make them believe in its reality. However, it wasn't conclusive enough to justify a public declaration of war or to inspire confidence for praying about the situation and exhorting the people. They recommended that the colonies refrain from using force for the time being but should remain prepared for defense until it became clearer whether there would be peace or more evident reasons for war.[82] The general court agreed with the elders' opinion.

The intelligence of the practices of the Dutch governor with the Indians becoming more certain, all the commissioners except Mr. Bradstreet of Massachusetts, declared in favour of war. Their proceedings were immediately interrupted by a declaration of the general court of Massachusetts, that no determination of the commissioners, although they should be unanimous, should bind the general court to join in an offensive war which should appear to be unjust. A serious altercation ensued, in the course of which the other colonies pressed the war as a measure essential to their safety; but Massachusetts adhered inflexibly to its first resolution. This additional evidence of the incompetency of their union to bind one member, stronger than all the rest, threatened a dissolution of the confederacy; and that event seems to have been prevented only by the inability of the others to stand alone. Alarmed at their situation, and irritated by the conduct of their elder sister, Connecticut and New Haven represented Cromwell, then lord protector of England, the danger to which the colonies were exposed from the Dutch and the Indians; and the hazard the smaller provinces must continue to incur, unless the league between them could be maintained and executed according to its true intent, and the interpretation which its articles had uniformly received.

As the Dutch governor's strategies with the Indians became clearer, all the commissioners except Mr. Bradstreet from Massachusetts voted in favor of war. Their discussions were quickly interrupted by a statement from the Massachusetts General Court, asserting that no decision made by the commissioners, even if unanimous, would force the General Court to engage in a war that seemed unjust. A serious argument followed, during which the other colonies insisted that war was crucial for their safety; however, Massachusetts firmly stuck to its original decision. This highlighted the inability of their alliance to effectively bind one member, which was stronger than the rest, threatening to break up the confederation. That outcome seemed to be avoided only because the others couldn't survive on their own. Concerned about their situation and frustrated with their older counterpart, Connecticut and New Haven appealed to Cromwell, then the Lord Protector of England, about the dangers the colonies faced from the Dutch and the Indians, and the risks smaller provinces would continue to face unless their alliance could be maintained and executed as originally intended, following the consistent interpretation of its articles.

With his usual promptness and decision, Cromwell detached a small armament for the reduction of the Dutch colony, and recommended to Massachusetts to furnish aid to the expedition. Although the legitimate requisitions of the government of the union had been ineffectual, the recommendation of the lord protector was not to be disregarded; and the general court passed a resolution conforming to it. 1654A treaty of peace, which was signed in April, saved the Dutch colony.[83]

With his usual quickness and decisiveness, Cromwell assigned a small military force to take control of the Dutch colony and suggested that Massachusetts provide support for the mission. Even though the official requests from the federal government had been ineffective, the Lord Protector's recommendation couldn’t be ignored; as a result, the general court passed a resolution to comply with it. 1654A peace treaty, signed in April, protected the Dutch colony.[83]

The progress of the French in their neighbourhood had been viewed with regret and apprehension by all New England. Expedition against Acadié.Sedgewic, the commander of the forces which had been destined against Manhadoes, animated with the vigour of his master, was easily prevailed on to turn his arms against a people, whose religious tenets he detested, and whose country he hated. He soon dislodged the French from Penobscot, and subdued all Acadié. 1655The ministers of his most christian majesty, pending the negotiations for the treaty of Westminster, demanded restitution of the forts Pentagoet, St. Johns, and Port Royal; but, each nation having claims on the country, their pretensions were referred to the arbitrators appointed to adjust the damages committed on either side since the year 1640; and the restitution of Acadié was postponed for future discussion.

The progress of the French in their area had been viewed with regret and concern by all of New England. Mission to Acadié.Sedgewic, the commander of the forces that had been sent to Manhadoes, motivated by the energy of his leader, was easily convinced to turn his soldiers against a group whose religious beliefs he despised and whose land he loathed. He quickly drove the French out of Penobscot and conquered all of Acadié. 1655The ministers of his most Christian Majesty, while negotiations were taking place for the treaty of Westminster, demanded the return of the forts Pentagoet, St. Johns, and Port Royal; however, since both nations had claims on the land, their demands were sent to the arbitrators assigned to resolve the damages caused by either side since the year 1640, and the return of Acadié was postponed for future discussion.

1656

Cromwell seems not to have intended to restore the countries he had conquered. He granted to St. Etienne, Crown and Temple, for ever, the territory denominated Acadié, and part of the country commonly called Nova Scotia, extending along the coast to Pentagoet, and to the river St. George.

Cromwell didn't seem to plan on restoring the lands he had conquered. He permanently granted St. Etienne, the Crown and the Temple, the territory known as Acadié, along with part of the region commonly referred to as Nova Scotia, stretching along the coast to Pentagoet and up to the St. George River.

Until the restoration, the colonies of New England continued in a state of unexampled prosperity. Those regulations respecting navigation, which were rigorously enforced against others less in favour, were dispensed with for their benefit. They maintained external peace by the vigour and sagacity with which their government was administered; and, improved the advantages which the times afforded them by industry and attention to their interests. In this period of prosperity, they acquired a degree of strength and consistence which enabled them to struggle through the difficulties that afterwards assailed them.

Until the restoration, the New England colonies thrived like never before. The navigation laws, which were strictly enforced on others, were relaxed for their benefit. They kept external peace through the strength and wisdom of their government, and they took advantage of the opportunities available by being industrious and focused on their interests. During this prosperous time, they gained a level of strength and stability that allowed them to face the challenges that later came their way.

These sober industrious people were peculiarly attentive to the instruction of youth. Education was among the first objects of their care. In addition to private institutions, they had brought the college at Cambridge to a state of forwardness which reflects much credit on their character. As early as the year 1636, the general court had bestowed four hundred pounds on a public school at Newtown, the name by which Cambridge was then known. Two years afterwards, an additional donation was made by the reverend Mr. John Harvard, in consequence of which the institution received the name of Harvard college. In 1642, this college was placed under the government of the governor, and deputy governor, and of the magistrates, and ministers of the six next adjacent towns, who, with the president were incorporated for that purpose; and, in 1650, its first charter was granted.[84]

These serious, hardworking people were especially focused on educating the young. Education was one of their top priorities. Along with private schools, they had advanced the college at Cambridge to a point that reflects well on their character. As early as 1636, the general court allocated four hundred pounds to a public school in Newtown, the name of Cambridge at that time. Two years later, an additional donation was made by the Reverend John Harvard, which led to the institution being named Harvard College. In 1642, this college was put under the management of the governor, deputy governor, magistrates, and ministers from the six nearby towns, who, along with the president, were incorporated for that purpose; and in 1650, its first charter was granted.[84]

It is to be lamented that the same people possessed a degree of bigotry in religion, and a spirit of intolerance, which their enlightened posterity will view with regret. During this period of prosperity, the government maintained the severity of its institutions against all those who dissented from the church; and exerted itself assiduously in what was thought the holy work of punishing heretics, and introducing conformity in matters of faith. In this time, the sect denominated Quakers appeared. They were fined, imprisoned, whipped, and, at length put to death; but could not be totally suppressed. As enthusiastic as their persecutors, they gloried in their sufferings, and deemed themselves the martyrs of truth.

It’s unfortunate that the same people had a level of religious bigotry and intolerance that their enlightened descendants will look back on with regret. During this time of prosperity, the government enforced strict rules against anyone who disagreed with the church and worked hard at what they believed was a sacred mission to punish heretics and force conformity in beliefs. During this time, a group called the Quakers emerged. They were fined, imprisoned, whipped, and ultimately executed, but they couldn’t be completely silenced. Just as passionately as their persecutors, they took pride in their suffering and considered themselves martyrs for the truth.


CHAPTER V.

Transactions succeeding the restoration of Charles II.... Contests between Connecticut and New Haven.... Discontents in Virginia.... Grant to the Duke of York.... Commissioners appointed by the crown.... Conquest of the Dutch settlements.... Conduct of Massachusetts to the royal commissioners.... Their recall.... Massachusetts evades a summons to appear before the King and council.... Settlement of Carolina.... Form of government.... Constitution of Mr. Locke.... Discontents in the county of Albemarle.... Invasion from Florida.... Abolition of the constitution of Mr. Locke.... Bacon's rebellion.... His death.... Assembly deprived of judicial power.... Discontents in Virginia.... Population of the colony.

Transactions after the restoration of Charles II.... Conflicts between Connecticut and New Haven.... Grievances in Virginia.... Grant to the Duke of York.... Commissioners appointed by the crown.... Conquest of the Dutch settlements.... Massachusetts's actions regarding the royal commissioners.... Their removal.... Massachusetts dodges a summons to appear before the King and council.... Settlement of Carolina.... Government structure.... Constitution by Mr. Locke.... Grievances in the county of Albemarle.... Invasion from Florida.... Abolishment of Mr. Locke's constitution.... Bacon's rebellion.... His death.... Assembly stripped of judicial power.... Grievances in Virginia.... Population of the colony.

 

1660

The restoration of Charles II. was soon known in America, and excited, in the different colonies very different emotions. In Virginia, and in Maryland, the intelligence was received with transport, and the King was proclaimed amidst acclamations of unfeigned joy. In Massachusetts, the unwelcome information was heard with doubt, and in silence. Republicans in religion and in politics, all their affections were engaged in favour of the revolutionary party in England, and they saw, in the restoration of monarchy, much more to fear than to hope for themselves. Nor were they mistaken in their forebodings.

The restoration of Charles II was quickly known in America and stirred very different reactions in the various colonies. In Virginia and Maryland, the news was received with excitement, and the King was proclaimed amid cheers of genuine joy. In Massachusetts, however, the unwelcome news was met with skepticism and silence. Republicans in both religion and politics were fully invested in the revolutionary movement in England, and they viewed the return of the monarchy as holding much more danger than hope for themselves. They were not wrong in their predictions.

No sooner was Charles seated on the throne, than Parliament voted a duty of five per centum on all merchandises exported from, or imported into, any of the dominions belonging to the English crown; and, in the course of the same session the celebrated navigation act was re-enacted. The difficulty of carrying this system into execution among a distant people, accustomed to the advantages of a free trade, was foreseen; and the law directed that the governors of the several plantations should, before entering into office, take an oath faithfully to observe it.[85]

No sooner had Charles taken his seat on the throne than Parliament approved a 5% duty on all goods exported from or imported into any of the English crown's territories. During the same session, the famous navigation act was reenacted. It was anticipated that enforcing this system among a distant population used to the benefits of free trade would be challenging, so the law stipulated that the governors of the various colonies must take an oath to uphold it before assuming office.[85]

As some compensation to the colonists for these commercial restraints, it was also enacted that no tobacco should be planted or made in England or Ireland, Guernsey, or Jersey. These regulations confined the trade of the colonies to England; and confined on them, exclusively, the production of tobacco.

As some compensation to the colonists for these commercial restrictions, it was also established that no tobacco should be grown or produced in England or Ireland, Guernsey, or Jersey. These rules limited the colonies' trade to England and restricted them to exclusively producing tobacco.

Charles, on ascending the throne, transmitted to Sir William Berkeley a commission as governor of Virginia, with instructions to summon an assembly, and to assure it of his intention to grant a general pardon to all persons, other than those who were attainted by act of Parliament; provided all acts passed during the rebellion, derogating from the obedience due to the King and his government, should be repealed.

Charles, upon taking the throne, sent Sir William Berkeley a commission as governor of Virginia, with orders to call an assembly and to let it know his intention to give a general pardon to everyone except those who had been convicted by act of Parliament. This was on the condition that all laws passed during the rebellion, which undermined the loyalty owed to the King and his government, would be repealed.

1661

The assembly, which had been summoned in March 1660, in the name of the King, though he was not then acknowledged in England, and which had been prorogued by the governor to the following March, then convened, and engaged in the arduous task of revising the laws of the colony. One of the motives assigned for this revision strongly marks the temper of the day. It is that they may "repeal and expunge all unnecessary acts, and chiefly such as might keep in memory their forced deviation from his majesty's obedience."[86]

The assembly, which was called together in March 1660 in the name of the King, even though he wasn't recognized in England at the time, then met after being postponed by the governor to the following March. They took on the challenging task of revising the colony's laws. One of the reasons given for this revision highlights the mood of the period. It is that they aim to "repeal and remove all unnecessary acts, especially those that might remind them of their forced departure from his majesty's rule."[86]

This laborious work was accomplished; and, in its execution, the first object of attention was religion. The church of England was established by law, and provision was made for its ministers. To preserve the purity and unity of its doctrines and discipline, those only who had been ordained by some bishop in England, and who should subscribe an engagement to conform to the constitution of the church of England and the laws there established, could be inducted by the governor: and no others were permitted to preach. The day of the execution of Charles I. was ordered to be kept as a fast; and the anniversaries of the birth, and of the restoration of Charles II. to be celebrated as holy days. The duties on exports and tonnage were rendered perpetual; the privilege of the burgesses from arrest was established, and their number fixed; the courts of justice were organised; and many useful laws were passed, regulating the interior affairs of the colony.[87]

This hard work was completed; and, in carrying it out, the primary focus was religion. The Church of England was legally established, and provisions were made for its ministers. To maintain the purity and unity of its beliefs and practices, only those who had been ordained by a bishop in England and who agreed to follow the constitution of the Church of England and the established laws could be appointed by the governor: no one else was allowed to preach. The day of Charles I's execution was designated as a day of fasting; and the anniversaries of the birth and restoration of Charles II were to be celebrated as holy days. The duties on exports and tonnage were made permanent; the privilege of the burgesses from arrest was established, and their number was fixed; the courts were organized; and many beneficial laws were passed to regulate the internal affairs of the colony.[87]

An effort was made to encourage manufactures, especially that of silk. For each pound of that article which should be raised, a premium of fifty pounds of tobacco was given; and every person was enjoined to plant a number of mulberry trees proportioned to his quantity of land, in order to furnish food for the silk worm. But the labour of the colony had been long directed to the culture of tobacco, and Indian corn; and new systems of culture can seldom be introduced until their necessity becomes apparent. This attempt to multiply the objects of labour did not succeed, and the acts on the subject were soon repealed.

An effort was made to encourage manufacturers, especially in silk production. For each pound of silk produced, a premium of fifty pounds of tobacco was awarded; and everyone was instructed to plant a number of mulberry trees in relation to their land size to provide food for the silkworms. However, the colony's labor had long been focused on the cultivation of tobacco and corn, and new farming systems are rarely adopted until the need for them is clear. This attempt to diversify labor didn’t work out, and the laws regarding it were quickly repealed.

In Maryland, the legislature was also convened, and, as in Virginia, their first employment was to manifest their satisfaction with the restoration; after which they entered upon subjects of general utility.

In Maryland, the legislature also gathered, and, like in Virginia, their first task was to show their approval of the restoration; after that, they moved on to issues of general importance.

Rhode Island, excluded from the confederacy of the other New England colonies, and dreading danger to her independence from Massachusetts, was well pleased at the establishment of an authority which could overawe the strong, and protect the weak. Charles II. was immediately proclaimed; 1662Rhode Island incorporated.and an agent was deputed to the court of that monarch, for the purpose of soliciting a patent, confirming the right of the inhabitants to the soil, and jurisdiction of the country. The object of the mission was obtained, and the patentees were incorporated by the name of "The governor and company of the English colony of Rhode Island and Providence." The legislative power was vested in an assembly to consist of the governor, deputy governor, the assistants, and such of the freemen as should be chosen by the towns. The presence of the governor or his deputy, and of six assistants, was required to constitute an assembly. They were empowered to pass laws adapted to the situation of the colony, and not repugnant to those of England. "That part of the dominions of the crown in New England containing the islands in Narraghansetts bay, and the countries and parts adjacent," was granted to the governor and company and their successors, with the privilege to pass through, and trade with, any other English colonies.[88]

Rhode Island, left out of the confederation of the other New England colonies and worried about threats to its independence from Massachusetts, welcomed the creation of an authority that could keep the powerful in check and support the vulnerable. Charles II was quickly proclaimed; 1662Rhode Island became a state. An agent was sent to the court of that king to request a patent that confirmed the rights of the inhabitants to the land and jurisdiction of the area. The mission was successful, and the patentees were incorporated under the name "The governor and company of the English colony of Rhode Island and Providence." Legislative power was given to an assembly made up of the governor, deputy governor, assistants, and selected freemen from the towns. To form an assembly, the presence of the governor or his deputy and six assistants was required. They were authorized to pass laws suited to the colony's situation, as long as they didn't conflict with English laws. "That part of the crown’s territory in New England containing the islands in Narragansett Bay and the surrounding areas" was granted to the governor and company and their successors, along with the right to travel through and trade with any other English colonies.[88]

In Connecticut, the intelligence of the restoration was not attended by any manifestation of joy or sorrow. Winthrop was deputed to attend to the interests of the colony; Patent to Connecticut.and, in April, 1662, he obtained a charter incorporating them by the name of "The governor and company of the English colony of Connecticut in New England." The executive, as in the other colonies of New England, consisted of a governor, deputy governor, and assistants. The legislature was composed of the members of the executive, and of two deputies from every town. It was authorised to appoint annually the governor, assistants, and other officers; to erect courts of justice, and to make such laws as might be necessary for the colony, with the usual proviso, that they should not be contrary to those of England. To this corporation, the King granted that part of his dominions in New England, bounded, on the east, by Narraghansetts bay, on the north, by the southern line of Massachusetts, on the south, by the sea, and extending in longitude from east to west, with the line of Massachusetts, to the south sea.

In Connecticut, the news of the restoration didn’t bring about any signs of joy or sadness. Winthrop was chosen to look after the colony's interests; Patent to CT. and in April 1662, he secured a charter that incorporated them as "The governor and company of the English colony of Connecticut in New England." The executive branch, similar to other New England colonies, included a governor, a deputy governor, and assistants. The legislature consisted of the executive members and two deputies from each town. They were authorized to annually appoint the governor, assistants, and other officers; to establish courts of justice; and to create laws necessary for the colony, with the usual condition that they should not contradict those of England. The King granted this corporation a portion of his territories in New England, bordered on the east by Narragansett Bay, on the north by the southern line of Massachusetts, on the south by the ocean, and extending in longitude from east to west along the Massachusetts line to the South Sea.

1663
Contest between Connecticut and New Haven.

By this charter, New Haven was, without being consulted, included in Connecticut. The freemen of that province, dissatisfied with this measure, determined in general meeting, "that it was not lawful to join;" and unanimously resolved to adhere to their former association. A committee was appointed to address the assembly of Connecticut on this interesting subject. They insisted, not that the charter was void, but that it did not include them.

By this charter, New Haven was included in Connecticut without anyone asking for their opinion. The freemen of that area, unhappy with this decision, decided in a general meeting that "it wasn’t right to join," and they all agreed to stick with their previous association. A committee was set up to speak to the Connecticut assembly about this important issue. They argued that while the charter wasn’t void, it didn’t apply to them.

A negotiation between the two provinces was commenced, in which the people of New Haven maintained their right to a separate government with inflexible perseverance, and with a considerable degree of exasperation. They appealed to the crown from the explanation given by Connecticut to the charter; and governor Winthrop, the agent who had obtained that instrument, and who flattered himself with being able, on his return, to conciliate the contending parties, deemed it advisable to arrest all proceeding on their petition, by pledging himself that no injury should be done to New Haven by Connecticut; and that the incorporation of the two colonies should be effected only by the voluntary consent of both.

A negotiation between the two provinces began, where the people of New Haven insisted on their right to a separate government with stubborn determination and a fair amount of frustration. They appealed to the crown regarding the explanation provided by Connecticut about the charter; and Governor Winthrop, the agent who had secured that document, who believed he could mediate between the conflicting parties upon his return, thought it best to halt any action on their petition by promising that Connecticut would not harm New Haven and that the merging of the two colonies would only happen with the mutual agreement of both.

The government of Connecticut, however, still persisting to assert its jurisdiction, attempted to exercise it by claiming obedience from the people, appointing constables in their towns, disavowing the authority of the general court of New Haven, and protecting those who denied it. Complaints of these proceedings were laid before the commissioners of the united colonies, who declared that New Haven was still an integral member of the union, and that its jurisdiction could not be infringed without a breach of the articles of confederation.

The government of Connecticut, however, still insisting on its jurisdiction, tried to enforce it by demanding obedience from the people, appointing constables in their towns, rejecting the authority of the general court of New Haven, and supporting those who refused it. Complaints about these actions were submitted to the commissioners of the united colonies, who declared that New Haven was still a vital member of the union and that its jurisdiction couldn’t be violated without breaking the articles of confederation.

Disregarding this decision, Connecticut pursued unremittingly, the object of incorporation. The inhabitants of New Haven were encouraged to refuse the payment of taxes imposed by their legislature; and, when distress was made on the disobedient, assistance was obtained from Hartford. These proceedings seemed only to increase the irritation on the part of New Haven, where a deep sense of injury was entertained, and a solemn resolution taken to break off all farther treaty on the subject.

Disregarding this decision, Connecticut relentlessly pursued incorporation. The people of New Haven were encouraged to refuse payment of taxes imposed by their legislature; and when action was taken against those who disobeyed, help was sought from Hartford. These actions only seemed to fuel the frustration in New Haven, where there was a strong feeling of injustice and a serious commitment was made to end any further discussions on the issue.

This state of things was entirely changed by a piece of intelligence which gave the most serious alarm to all New England. Information was received that the King had granted to his brother, the duke of York, all the lands claimed by the Dutch, to which he had annexed a considerable part of the territory over which the northern colonies had exercised jurisdiction; and that an armament for the purpose of taking possession of the grant might soon be expected. To this it was added, that commissioners were to come at the same time, empowered to settle the disputes, and to new model the governments, of the colonies.

This situation changed completely with the news that caused serious concern throughout New England. It was reported that the King had given his brother, the Duke of York, all the lands claimed by the Dutch, including a significant portion of the territory over which the northern colonies had established control. Additionally, there was word that an armed force might soon arrive to take possession of these lands. It was also mentioned that commissioners would be coming at the same time, with the authority to resolve disputes and reorganize the governments of the colonies.

The commissioners of the united colonies, perceiving the necessity of accommodating internal differences, now took a decided part in favour of the proposed incorporation. The most intelligent inhabitants of New Haven became converts to the same opinion; but the prejudices imbibed by the mass of the people being still insurmountable, a vote in favour of the union could not be obtained.

The commissioners of the united colonies, realizing the need to resolve internal conflicts, took a clear stance in favor of the proposed incorporation. The most knowledgeable residents of New Haven started to share the same opinion, but the deep-seated biases held by the general population were still too strong, so a vote in favor of the union could not be achieved.

At length, after the arrival of the commissioners appointed by the crown, and a manifestation of their opinion in favour of the incorporation; after a long course of negotiation which terminated in a compact establishing certain principles of equality required by the jealousy of New Haven; the union was completed, and the representatives of the two colonies met in the same assembly.

Finally, after the commissioners appointed by the crown arrived and expressed their support for the merger, and after a lengthy negotiation process that resulted in an agreement on certain principles of equality needed to appease New Haven's concerns, the union was finalized, and the representatives of both colonies gathered in the same assembly.

During the frequent changes which took place in England after the death of Cromwell, Massachusetts preserved a cautious neutrality; and seemed disposed to avail herself of any favourable occurrences, without exposing herself to the resentments of that party which might ultimately obtain the ascendancy. Although expressly ordered, she did not proclaim Richard as lord-protector; nor did she take any step to recognise the authority of Parliament. The first intelligence of the restoration of Charles was received with the hesitation of men who are unwilling to believe a fact too well supported by evidence to be discredited; and when they were informed of it in a manner not to be questioned, they neither proclaimed the King, nor manifested, by any public act, their admission of his authority. This was not the only testimony of their dissatisfaction. Whaley and Goff, two of the judges of Charles I., came passengers in the vessel which brought this intelligence, and were received with distinction by the government, and with affection by the people.[89]

During the constant changes that happened in England after Cromwell's death, Massachusetts maintained a cautious neutrality and seemed ready to make the most of any favorable situations without provoking the resentment of the party that might ultimately come to power. Although they were explicitly instructed to do so, they did not recognize Richard as lord protector, nor did they take any steps to acknowledge the authority of Parliament. The news of Charles's restoration was met with the skepticism of people who are reluctant to accept a fact that is too well supported by evidence to deny; and when they received confirmation in an undeniable manner, they neither proclaimed the King nor showed any public act of recognizing his authority. This was not the only indication of their dissatisfaction. Whaley and Goff, two of the judges who had tried Charles I, traveled on the ship that brought this news and were welcomed with honor by the government and affection by the people.[89]

In a session of the general court, held in October, 1660, an address to the King was moved; but reports of the yet unsettled state of the kingdom being received, the motion did not prevail. They had seen so many changes in the course of a few months, as to think it not improbable that an address to the King might find the executive power in the hands of a committee of safety, or council of state. This uncertain state of things was not of long continuance. In November, a ship arrived from Bristol, bringing positive advices of the joyful and universal submission of the nation to the King, with letters from their agent, and from others, informing them that petitions had been presented against the colony, by those who thought themselves aggrieved by its proceedings. The time for deliberation was passed. A general court was convened, and a loyal address to the King was voted, in which, with considerable ability, though in the peculiar language of the day, they justified their whole conduct; and, without abandoning any opinion concerning their own rights, professed unlimited attachment to their sovereign. A similar address was made to Parliament; and letters were written to those noblemen who were the known friends of the colony, soliciting their interposition in its behalf. A gracious answer being returned by the King, a day of thanksgiving was appointed to acknowledge their gratitude to Heaven for inclining the heart of his majesty favourably to receive and answer their address.

In a session of the general court held in October 1660, a proposal to address the King was put forward; however, due to reports about the still unstable state of the kingdom, the proposal did not succeed. They had witnessed so many changes in just a few months that they believed it was possible the executive power might be in the hands of a safety committee or state council. This uncertainty didn't last long. In November, a ship arrived from Bristol with confirmed news of the joyful and widespread submission of the nation to the King, along with letters from their agent and others informing them that petitions had been presented against the colony by those who felt wronged by its actions. The time for discussion was over. A general court was assembled, and a loyal address to the King was voted on, in which they defended their actions with significant skill, though using the unique language of the time. They maintained their opinions about their own rights while expressing complete loyalty to their sovereign. A similar address was sent to Parliament, and letters were written to noblemen known to be friends of the colony, asking for their support. The King responded graciously, and a day of thanksgiving was established to express their gratitude to God for moving the King’s heart to receive and respond positively to their address.

Their apprehensions, however, of danger from the revolution in England still continued. Reports prevailed that their commercial intercourse with Virginia and the islands was to be interdicted; and that a governor-general might be expected whose authority should extend over all the colonies. On this occasion, the general court came to several resolutions, respecting the rights of the people, and the obedience due from them, which are strongly expressive of their deliberate opinions on these interesting subjects.

Their fears about danger from the revolution in England persisted. There were rumors that their trade with Virginia and the islands would be banned, and that a governor-general might be appointed whose authority would cover all the colonies. In response, the general court made several resolutions regarding the rights of the people and the obligations owed by them, which clearly reflected their considered views on these important issues.

It was resolved,

It was decided,

That the patent (under God) is the first and main foundation of the civil polity of the colony.

That the patent (under God) is the first and primary basis of the colony's civil governance.

That the governor and company are, by the patent, a body politic, invested with the power to make freemen.

That the governor and company are, by the patent, a political entity, granted the authority to make people free.

That the freemen have authority to choose annually a governor, deputy governor, assistants, representatives, and all other officers.

That the freemen have the power to elect a governor, deputy governor, assistants, representatives, and all other officials every year.

That the government thus constituted hath full power, both legislative and executive, for the government of all the people, whether inhabitants or strangers, without appeals; save only in the case of laws repugnant to those of England.

That the government created this way has full authority, both to make laws and to enforce them, over all people, whether residents or visitors, without appeal; except in cases where the laws contradict those of England.

That the government is privileged by all means, even by force of arms, to defend itself both by land and sea, against all who should attempt injury to the plantation or its inhabitants, and that in their opinion, any imposition prejudicial to the country, contrary to any just law of theirs, (not repugnant to the laws of England) would be an infringement of their rights.[90]

That the government has the right, by any means necessary, including military force, to protect itself both on land and at sea against anyone who tries to harm the plantation or its people. They believe that any unfair tax or law that hurts the country and goes against their just laws (as long as it doesn’t conflict with English law) would infringe upon their rights.[90]

These strong and characteristic resolutions were accompanied by a recognition of the duties to which they were bound by their allegiance. These were declared to consist, in upholding that colony as belonging of right to his majesty, and not to subject it to any foreign prince; in preserving his person and dominions; and in settling the peace and prosperity of the King and nation, by punishing crimes, and by propagating the Gospel.[91]

These strong and distinctive resolutions were matched by an acknowledgment of the responsibilities they had due to their loyalty. They stated that their duties included maintaining that the colony rightfully belonged to the king, not allowing it to fall under any foreign ruler; protecting his person and territory; and ensuring the peace and prosperity of the king and the nation by punishing crimes and spreading the Gospel.[91]

It was, at the same time, determined that the royal warrant, which had been received sometime before, for apprehending Whaley and Goff, ought to be faithfully executed. These persons however were permitted to escape to Connecticut, where they were received with every demonstration of regard, and to remain during life in New England, only taking care not to appear in public.

It was also decided that the royal warrant, which had been received a while ago, for capturing Whaley and Goff, should be carried out faithfully. However, these individuals were allowed to escape to Connecticut, where they were welcomed warmly and allowed to live out their lives in New England, as long as they stayed out of the public eye.

At length, in August 1661, it was determined to proclaim the King; but, as if unable to conceal the reluctance with which this step was taken, an order was made, on the same day, prohibiting all disorderly behaviour on the occasion, and, in particular, directing that no man should presume to drink his majesty's health, "which," adds the order, "he hath in a special manner forbid."

At last, in August 1661, it was decided to announce the King; however, as if unable to hide their hesitation about this decision, an order was issued on the same day banning any unruly behavior during the event, specifically stating that no one should dare to toast the King’s health, "which," the order adds, "he has specifically forbidden."

Farther intelligence being received from England of the increasing complaints against the government of Massachusetts, agents were deputed with instructions to represent the colonists as loyal and obedient subjects, to remove any ill impressions that had been made against them, and to learn the disposition of his majesty toward them; but to do nothing which might prejudice their charter.

Further information from England indicated that complaints against the Massachusetts government were growing. Agents were sent with instructions to portray the colonists as loyal and obedient subjects, to clear up any negative perceptions about them, and to find out how the king felt toward them; however, they were to avoid anything that could jeopardize their charter.

The agents, who engaged reluctantly in a service from which they rightly augured to themselves censure rather than approbation, were received more favourably than had been expected. They soon returned with a letter from the King, confirming their charter, and containing a pardon for all treasons committed during the late troubles, with the exception of those only who were attainted by act of Parliament. But the royal missive also required that the general court should review its ordinances, and repeal such of them as were repugnant to the authority of the crown; that the oath of allegiance should be taken by every person; that justice should be administered in the King's name; that all who desired it, should be permitted to use the book of common prayer, and to perform their devotions according to the ceremonials of the church of England; and that freeholders of competent estates, not vicious, should be allowed to vote in the election of officers, though they were of different persuasions in church government.[92]

The agents, who reluctantly took on a duty that they expected would bring them more criticism than praise, were received more warmly than anticipated. They quickly returned with a letter from the King, confirming their charter and offering a pardon for all treasons committed during the recent troubles, except for those who were specifically condemned by act of Parliament. However, the royal letter also required that the general court revise its rules and eliminate any that contradicted the authority of the crown; that everyone must take an oath of allegiance; that justice should be served in the King's name; that anyone who wanted to should be allowed to use the Book of Common Prayer and practice their faith according to the Church of England's traditions; and that freeholders with sufficient estates, who were not of bad character, should be allowed to vote in officer elections, even if they held different views on church governance.[92]

These requisitions gave much disquiet; and that alone seems ever to have been complied with which directed judicial proceedings to be carried on in the name of the King. The agents on their return were ill received by the people; and were considered as having sacrificed the interests of their country, because, with the agreeable, were mingled some bitter though unavoidable ingredients.

These requests caused a lot of unease; and it seems that only the one directing legal actions to be carried out in the name of the King was ever followed. The agents faced a cold reception from the people upon their return; they were seen as having sold out the interests of their country, as their agreeable actions were mixed with some harsh but unavoidable realities.

During these transactions, the Parliament of England proceeded to complete its system of confining the trade of the colonies to the mother country. It was enacted that no commodity of the growth or manufacture of Europe, shall be imported into the settlements of England, in Asia, Africa, or America, but such as shall be shipped in England, and proceed directly in English bottoms, navigated by Englishmen. Salt for the fisheries, wine from Madeira and the Azores; and servants, horses, and victuals, from Scotland and Ireland, were excepted from this general rule.

During these transactions, the Parliament of England moved to finalize its system of restricting colonial trade to the mother country. It was enacted that no goods from Europe could be imported into England's settlements in Asia, Africa, or America unless they were shipped from England and carried by English ships operated by English sailors. Salt for the fisheries, wine from Madeira and the Azores, as well as servants, horses, and food from Scotland and Ireland, were exceptions to this general rule.

To counterbalance these restrictions, duties were imposed on salted and dried fish caught or imported by other vessels than those belonging to subjects of the crown; and additional regulations were made for enforcing the prohibition of the culture of tobacco in England.

To balance out these restrictions, taxes were placed on salted and dried fish caught or imported by vessels other than those owned by crown subjects; and extra rules were created to enforce the ban on growing tobacco in England.

These commercial restrictions were the never failing source of discontent and controversy between the mother country and her colonies. Even in those of the south, where similar restraints had been enforced by Cromwell, they were executed imperfectly; but, in New England, where the governors were elected by the people, they appear to have been, for some time, entirely disregarded.[93]

These trade restrictions were a constant source of dissatisfaction and conflict between the mother country and her colonies. Even in the southern colonies, where similar limitations were imposed by Cromwell, they weren't implemented very well; however, in New England, where the governors were elected by the people, they seem to have been completely ignored for a while.[93]

Discontents in Virginia.

The good humour which prevailed in Virginia on the restoration of Charles to the throne, was not of long duration. The restraints on commerce, and the continually decreasing price of tobacco, soon excited considerable discontents. The legislature endeavoured, by prohibiting its culture for a limited time, to raise its value; but, Maryland refusing to concur in the measure, the attempt was unsuccessful. Other legislative remedies were applied with as little advantage. Acts were passed suspending all proceedings in the courts of law, except for goods imported; giving to country creditors priority in payment of debts; and to contracts made within the colony, precedence in all courts of justice. Such expedients as these have never removed the discontents which produced them.

The good mood in Virginia when Charles was restored to the throne didn’t last long. Restrictions on trade and the continuously falling price of tobacco quickly caused significant unhappiness. The legislature tried to raise its value by temporarily banning its production, but since Maryland wouldn't go along with it, the effort failed. Other legislative solutions were just as ineffective. Laws were passed to pause all court proceedings except for imported goods, to give local creditors priority in getting paid, and to ensure contracts made within the colony took precedence in all courts. These kinds of measures have never resolved the dissatisfaction that caused them.

The English government seems, at all times, to have questioned the right of the Dutch to their settlements in America; and never to have formally relinquished its claim to that territory. Charles now determined to assert it; 1664Grant to the duke of York.and granted to his brother the duke of York "all that part of the main land of New England, beginning at a certain place called and known by the name of St. Croix, next adjoining to New England in America, and from thence extending along the sea coast unto a certain place called Pemaquie, or Pemaquid, and so up the river thereof to the farthest Head of the same, as it tendeth northward; and extending from thence to the river Kernbequin, and so upwards by the shortest course to the river Canada northward; and also all that island or islands commonly called by the general name or names of Meitowax, or Long Island, situate and being towards the west of Cape Cod, and the narrow Highgansetts, abutting upon the main land between the two rivers there called and known by the several names of Connecticut and Hudson's river, and all the land from the west side of Connecticut river to the east side of Delaware bay, and also all those several islands called or known by the names of Martha's Vineyard or Nantucks, otherwise Nantucket."

The English government always seemed to question the Dutch right to their settlements in America and never officially gave up its claim to that territory. Charles decided to assert it; 1664Grant to the Duke of York. He granted his brother, the Duke of York, "all that part of the mainland of New England, starting at a place known as St. Croix, adjacent to New England in America, and then extending along the coastline to a location called Pemaquie, or Pemaquid, and up the river there to its furthest point as it goes northward; and extending from there to the Kernbequin River, and then straight up north to the Canada River; also including all that island or islands commonly referred to by the general names of Meitowax, or Long Island, located to the west of Cape Cod and the narrow Highgansetts, adjacent to the mainland between the two rivers known as Connecticut and Hudson's River, and all the land from the west side of the Connecticut River to the east side of Delaware Bay, as well as all those several islands known as Martha's Vineyard or Nantucks, otherwise Nantucket."

To reduce this country, part of which was then in the peaceable possession of the Dutch, colonel Nichols was dispatched with four frigates, carrying three hundred soldiers. Commissioners appointed by the Crown.In the same ships, came four commissioners, of whom colonel Nichols was one, "empowered to hear and determine complaints and appeals in causes, as well military as civil and criminal, within New England; and to proceed in all things for settling the peace and security of the country." Intelligence of this deputation preceded its arrival, and the preparation made for its reception, evidences the disposition then prevailing in Massachusetts. A committee was appointed to repair on board the ships as soon as they should appear, and to communicate to their commanders the desire of the local government that the inferior officers and soldiers should be ordered, when they came on shore to refresh themselves, "at no time to exceed a convenient number, to come unarmed, to observe an orderly conduct, and to give no offence to the people and laws of the country." As if to manifest in a still more solemn manner their hostility, to the objects of the commissioners, a day of fasting and prayer was appointed to implore the mercy of God under their many distractions and troubles.[94]

To take control of this country, part of which was then peacefully held by the Dutch, Colonel Nichols was sent with four frigates carrying three hundred soldiers. Crown-appointed commissioners. The same ships brought four commissioners, including Colonel Nichols, "authorized to hear and resolve complaints and appeals in both military and civil matters, as well as criminal cases, within New England; and to take all necessary actions for establishing peace and security in the area." News of this delegation arrived before their ships did, and the preparations made to welcome them show the attitude prevailing in Massachusetts at the time. A committee was set up to board the ships as soon as they arrived, to inform their commanders of the local government's request that the lower-ranking officers and soldiers, when coming ashore to rest, should "at no time exceed a suitable number, come unarmed, behave properly, and not offend the people or laws of the country." To further express their opposition to the commission's goals, a day of fasting and prayer was designated to seek God's mercy amid their various uncertainties and troubles.[94]

The commissioners arrived in July, and their commission was immediately laid before the council, with a letter from the King requiring prompt assistance for the expedition against New Netherlands.

The commissioners arrived in July, and their commission was immediately presented to the council, along with a letter from the King asking for immediate help for the mission against New Netherlands.

The general court, which was immediately convened, after having first resolved "that they would bear faith and true allegiance to his majesty, and adhere to their patent, so dearly obtained, and so long enjoyed, by undoubted right in the sight of God and man," determined to raise two hundred men for the expedition. In the mean time colonel Nichols proceeded to Manhadoes. Conquest of the Dutch colony.The auxiliary force raised by Massachusetts was rendered unnecessary by the capitulation of New Amsterdam, which was soon followed by the surrender of the whole province.

The general court, which was quickly called together, first decided "that they would remain faithful and loyal to his majesty, and stick to their patent, which was so dearly won and long enjoyed, by undeniable right in the eyes of God and man." They decided to raise two hundred men for the mission. Meanwhile, Colonel Nichols moved on to Manhadoes. Conquest of the Dutch colony. The extra force raised by Massachusetts ended up being unnecessary because of the surrender of New Amsterdam, which was soon followed by the capitulation of the entire province.

The year after captain Argal had subdued Manhadoes, the garrison, having obtained a reinforcement from Holland, returned to their ancient allegiance. In 1621, the states general made a grant of the country to the West India company, who erected a fort called Good Hope on Connecticut (which they denominated Fresh) river, and another called Nassau on the east side of Delaware bay. The fort on Connecticut river, however, did not protect that frontier against the people of New England, who continued to extend their settlements towards the south. The Dutch remonstrated in vain against these encroachments, and were under the necessity of receding as their more powerful neighbours advanced, until the eastern part of Long Island, and the country within a few miles of the Hudson were relinquished. Farther south, the Dutch had built fort Casimir (now New Castle) on the Delaware. This fort was taken from them by the Swedes, who claimed the western shore of that river, but was retaken by the Dutch, who, at the same time, conquered Christina, and received the submission of the few Swedes who were scattered on the margin of the river. They also made a settlement at cape Henlopen, which attracted the attention of lord Baltimore, who sent a commission to New Castle ordering the Dutch governor to remove beyond the 40th degree of north latitude, to which his lordship's claim extended. This mandate however was not obeyed.

The year after Captain Argal had conquered the Manhadoes, the garrison, having received reinforcements from Holland, returned to their old loyalty. In 1621, the States General granted the land to the West India Company, which built a fort called Good Hope on the Connecticut River (which they called Fresh River) and another fort named Nassau on the east side of Delaware Bay. However, the fort on the Connecticut River didn't protect that area from the New England settlers, who kept pushing their settlements south. The Dutch protested these encroachments in vain and had to retreat as their more powerful neighbors advanced, eventually giving up the eastern part of Long Island and land within a few miles of the Hudson River. Further south, the Dutch had built Fort Casimir (now New Castle) on the Delaware. This fort was taken from them by the Swedes, who claimed the western shore of the river, but it was later retaken by the Dutch, who also conquered Christina and received the surrender of the few Swedes scattered along the riverbank. They also established a settlement at Cape Henlopen, which caught the attention of Lord Baltimore, who sent a commission to New Castle instructing the Dutch governor to move south of the 40th degree of north latitude, which was the extent of his claim. However, this order was not followed.

On the appearance of colonel Nichols before New Amsterdam, Stuyvesant, the governor, was disposed to defend the place; but the inhabitants, feeling no inclination for the contest, took part with their invaders; and Stuyvesant was compelled to sign a capitulation, by which he surrendered the town to the English, stipulating for the inhabitants their property, and the rights of free denizens. New Amsterdam took the name of New York, and the island of Manhattans that of York Island.[95]

When Colonel Nichols arrived at New Amsterdam, Governor Stuyvesant was ready to defend the city; however, the residents, not wanting to fight, sided with the invaders. As a result, Stuyvesant had no choice but to sign a surrender agreement, giving the town to the English while ensuring the residents' property rights and their status as free citizens. New Amsterdam was renamed New York, and the island of the Manhattans became York Island.[95]

Hudson's, and the south, or Delaware river, were still to be reduced. Carteret commanded the expedition against fort Orange, up Hudson's river, which surrendered on the twenty-fourth of September, and received the name of Albany. While at that place, he formed a league with the five nations, which proved eminently useful to the views of the English in America.

Hudson's River and the South, or Delaware River, still needed to be conquered. Carteret led the expedition against Fort Orange, located up Hudson's River, which surrendered on September 24th and was renamed Albany. While there, he formed an alliance with the five nations, which turned out to be extremely beneficial for the English interests in America.

The command of the expedition against the settlement on the Delaware was given to sir Robert Carr, who completed the conquest of that country.

The command of the expedition against the settlement on the Delaware was given to Sir Robert Carr, who finished the conquest of that territory.

Thus did England acquire all that fine country lying between her southern and northern colonies; an acquisition deriving not less importance from its situation, than from its extent and fertility.

Thus, England gained all that beautiful land situated between her southern and northern colonies; a gain that is just as significant because of its location as it is because of its size and richness.

Nichols took possession of the conquered territory, but was compelled to surrender a part of it to Carteret.

Nichols took control of the conquered territory but had to give up part of it to Carteret.

Soon after the patent to the duke of York, and before the conquest of New Netherlands, that prince had granted to lord Berkeley, and sir George Carteret, all that tract of land adjacent to New England, to the westward of Long Island, bounded on the east, south, and west, by the river Hudson, the sea, and the Delaware; and, on the north, by forty-one degrees and forty minutes north latitude. This country was denominated New Jersey.[96]

Soon after the patent was granted to the Duke of York, and before the conquest of New Netherlands, that prince granted to Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret all the land next to New England, to the west of Long Island, bordered on the east, south, and west by the Hudson River, the ocean, and the Delaware; and to the north, by forty-one degrees and forty minutes north latitude. This area was called New Jersey.[96]

The conquest of New Netherlands being achieved, the commissioners entered on the other duties assigned them. A great part of Connecticut had been included in the patent to the duke of York; and a controversy concerning limits arose between that colony and New York. In December, their boundaries were adjusted by the commissioners in a manner which appears to have been satisfactory to all parties.

The conquest of New Netherlands being completed, the commissioners began the other tasks assigned to them. A large portion of Connecticut had been included in the patent granted to the Duke of York, leading to a dispute over borders between that colony and New York. In December, their boundaries were settled by the commissioners in a way that seemed satisfactory to everyone involved.

In Plymouth, and in Rhode Island, the commissioners found no difficulty in the full exercise of the powers committed to them. In Massachusetts, they were considered as men clothed with an authority subversive of the liberties of the colony, which the sovereign could not rightly confer. The people of that province had been long in habits of self-government, and seem to have entertained opinions which justified their practice. They did not acknowledge that allegiance to the crown which is due from English subjects residing within the realm; but considered themselves as purchasers from independent sovereigns of the territory which they occupied, and as owing to England, only that voluntary subjection which was created and defined by their charter. They considered this instrument as a compact between the mother country and themselves, and as enumerating all the cases in which obedience was due from them. In this spirit, they agreed, soon after the arrival of the commissioners, on an address to the crown. This address, in which they express great apprehension of danger to their rights from the extraordinary powers granted to men not appointed in conformity with their charter, is drawn up in a style of much earnestness and sincerity, and concludes with these remarkable words, "let our government live, our patent live, our magistrates live, our religious enjoyments live; so shall we all yet have farther cause to say from our hearts, let the King live for ever." This address was accompanied with letters to many of the nobility supposed to possess influence at court, praying their intercession in behalf of the colony; but neither the address, nor the letters were favourably received.[97]

In Plymouth and Rhode Island, the commissioners faced no issues in fully exercising their powers. In Massachusetts, however, they were seen as having an authority that undermined the colony's freedoms, which the sovereign couldn't legitimately grant. The people there had long practiced self-governance and held views that supported their way of life. They didn't recognize the allegiance to the crown that is expected from English subjects living in the realm; instead, they viewed themselves as buyers from independent rulers of the land they occupied, believing they owed England only the voluntary loyalty outlined in their charter. They saw this document as a contract between the mother country and themselves, listing all the situations in which they owed obedience. In this spirit, shortly after the commissioners' arrival, they crafted a message to the crown. This message, which expressed serious concerns about threats to their rights from the unusual powers given to men not appointed according to their charter, was written with great earnestness and sincerity, concluding with the noteworthy words, "let our government live, our patent live, our magistrates live, our religious enjoyments live; so shall we all yet have farther cause to say from our hearts, let the King live forever." This message was sent along with letters to many nobles believed to have influence at court, asking for their support for the colony; however, neither the message nor the letters were well received.[97]

1665
Conduct of Massachusetts to the royal commissioners.

In April the commissioners arrived at Boston, and their communications with the general court commenced. The suspicions which these two bodies entertained of each other, opposed great obstacles to any cordial co-operation between them. The papers, on the part of the commissioners, display high ideas of their own authority, as the representatives of the crown, and a pre-conceived opinion that there was a disposition in the government to resist that authority. Those on the part of the general court manifest a wish to avoid a contest with the crown, and a desire to gratify his majesty, so far as professions of loyalty and submission could gratify him; but they manifest also a conviction of having done nothing improper, and a steadfast determination to make no concession incompatible with their rights. With these impressions, the correspondence soon became an altercation. The commissioners, finding their object was to be obtained neither by reasoning, nor by threats, attempted a practical assertion of their powers by summoning the parties before them, in order to hear and decide a complaint against the governor and company. The general court, with a decision which marked alike their vigour, and the high value they placed on their privileges, announced by sound of trumpet, their disapprobation of this proceeding, which they termed inconsistent with the laws and established authority; and declared that, in observance of their duty to God and to his majesty, and of the trust reposed in them by his majesty's good subjects in the colony, they could not consent to such proceedings, nor countenance those who would so act, or such as would abet them.

In April, the commissioners arrived in Boston, and their communication with the general court began. The mutual suspicions between these two groups created significant barriers to any friendly cooperation. The documents from the commissioners show a strong sense of their own authority as representatives of the crown, along with a preconceived notion that the government intended to resist this authority. On the other hand, the general court expressed a desire to avoid conflict with the crown and to please the king, as much as loyalty and submission could satisfy him. However, they also expressed a belief that they had done nothing wrong and a firm determination to make no concessions that would violate their rights. With these attitudes, their correspondence quickly escalated into an argument. The commissioners, realizing they couldn't achieve their goals through reasoning or threats, tried to assert their powers by summoning the parties for a hearing on a complaint against the governor and company. The general court, showcasing their determination and the high value they placed on their privileges, publicly announced their disapproval of this action, which they considered inconsistent with the laws and established authority. They declared that, in fulfilling their duty to God and to the king, and the trust placed in them by his loyal subjects in the colony, they could not consent to such actions or support those who would engage in them.

As a ground of compromise, the court stated their willingness to hear the case themselves in the presence of the commissioners, who would thereby be enabled to understand its merits; but this proposition was at once rejected, and every effort towards reconciliation proved unavailing.[98]

As a way to reach a compromise, the court expressed their readiness to handle the case themselves alongside the commissioners, who would then be able to grasp its importance; however, this suggestion was immediately dismissed, and all attempts at reconciliation were unsuccessful.[98]

1666

From Massachusetts, the commissioners proceeded to New Hampshire and Maine. They decided in favour of the claims of Mason and Gorges, and erected a royal government in each province, appointed justices of the peace, and exercised other acts of sovereignty; after which they returned to Boston. The general court, declaring that their proceedings to the eastward tended to the disturbance of the public peace, asked a conference on the subject, which was refused with a bitterness of expression that put an end to all farther communication between the parties. Massachusetts, soon afterwards, re-established her authority both in New Hampshire and Maine.

From Massachusetts, the commissioners moved on to New Hampshire and Maine. They supported the claims of Mason and Gorges, set up a royal government in each territory, appointed justices of the peace, and carried out other acts of authority; after that, they returned to Boston. The general court, stating that their actions in the east were disrupting public peace, requested a meeting to discuss it, which was declined with a harsh tone that ended any further communication between the groups. Soon after, Massachusetts reasserted its authority in both New Hampshire and Maine.

They are recalled.

Charles, on being informed of these transactions, recalled his commissioners, and ordered the general court to send agents to England, to answer the complaints made against its proceedings. The court, having more than once experienced the benefits of procrastination, affected at first to disbelieve the authenticity of the letter; and afterwards excused themselves from sending agents by saying that the ablest among them could not support their cause better than had already been done.

Charles, after hearing about these activities, recalled his commissioners and instructed the general court to send representatives to England to address the complaints about their actions. The court, having often felt the advantages of delaying, initially pretended to doubt the validity of the letter; and later justified their decision not to send representatives by claiming that even their most skilled members couldn't defend their case any better than it had already been done.

During these transactions in the north, new colonies were forming in the south.

During these dealings in the north, new colonies were being established in the south.

In the year 1663, that tract of country extending from the 36th degree of north latitude to the river St. Matheo, was made a province by the name of Carolina, and granted to lord Clarendon, the duke of Albemarle, lord Craven, lord Berkeley, lord Ashley, sir George Carteret, sir John Colleton, and sir William Berkeley, in absolute property for ever. This charter bears a strong resemblance to that of Maryland, and was probably copied from it.

In 1663, the area of land stretching from the 36th degree of north latitude to the St. Matheo River was established as a province named Carolina and granted to Lord Clarendon, the Duke of Albemarle, Lord Craven, Lord Berkeley, Lord Ashley, Sir George Carteret, Sir John Colleton, and Sir William Berkeley as permanent property. This charter is very similar to that of Maryland and was likely copied from it.

Settlement of Carolina.

The proprietors took immediate measures for Settlement the settlement of their colony. Its constitution consisted of a governor, to be chosen by themselves from thirteen persons nominated by the colonists; and an assembly to be composed of the governor, council, and representatives of the people, who should have power to make laws not contrary to those of England, which were to remain in force until the dissent of the proprietors should be published. Perfect freedom in religion was promised; and, as an inducement to emigration, one hundred acres of land, at the price of a half penny for each acre, were allowed for every freeman, and fifty for every servant, who should, within the space of five years, be settled in the province.

The owners quickly took steps to establish their colony. Its government consisted of a governor chosen by them from thirteen candidates nominated by the colonists, and an assembly made up of the governor, council, and representatives of the people. This assembly would have the authority to create laws that didn’t contradict those of England, which would remain in effect until the owners officially stated otherwise. They promised complete freedom of religion, and to encourage immigration, they offered one hundred acres of land at just half a penny per acre for each freeman, and fifty acres for every servant, who settled in the province within five years.

A small settlement had been made on Albemarle sound by some emigrants from Virginia, the superintendence of which had been conferred by the proprietors, on sir William Berkeley, then governor of that colony; with instructions to visit it, to appoint a governor and council of six persons for the management of its affairs, and to grant lands to the inhabitants on the same terms that those in Virginia might be obtained.

A small community had been established on Albemarle Sound by some immigrants from Virginia. The proprietors entrusted its oversight to Sir William Berkeley, who was then the governor of that colony. He was instructed to visit the settlement, appoint a governor and a council of six people to manage its affairs, and to grant lands to the residents on the same terms that lands could be acquired in Virginia.

The attention of the proprietors was next turned to the country south of cape Fear, which, as far as the river St. Matheo, was erected into a county by the name of Clarendon. Considerable numbers from Barbadoes emigrated into it, one of whom, Mr. John Yeamans, was appointed commander in chief; and, in 1665, a separate government was erected in it, similar to that in Albemarle.

The owners then focused on the area south of Cape Fear, which was designated as Clarendon County, stretching as far as the St. Matheo River. A significant number of people from Barbados moved there, including Mr. John Yeamans, who was appointed the commander in chief. In 1665, a separate government was established there, similar to the one in Albemarle.

The proprietors having discovered some valuable lands not comprehended in their original patent, obtained a new charter which bestowed on them a more extensive territory. This charter grants that province within the King's dominions in America, extending north eastward to Carahtuke inlet, thence in a straight line to Wyonok, which lies under 36 degrees 30 minutes north latitude; south westward to the 29th degree of north latitude; and from the Atlantic ocean to the South sea. Powers of government and privileges analogous to those comprised in other colonial charters, were also contained in this.

The owners found some valuable land that wasn’t included in their original patent, so they got a new charter that gave them a larger territory. This charter includes the province within the King’s lands in America, stretching northeast to Carahtuke Inlet, then in a straight line to Wyonok, which is located at 36 degrees 30 minutes north latitude; southwest to the 29th degree of north latitude; and from the Atlantic Ocean to the South Sea. It also included powers of government and privileges similar to those found in other colonial charters.

The people of Albemarle, employed like those of Virginia, in the cultivation of corn and tobacco, received their scanty supplies principally from New England; and carried on their small commerce in the vessels of those colonies. Their progress was slow, but they were contented. 1667A new constitution was given them, by which the executive power was placed in a governor, to act by the advice of a council of twelve, six of whom were to be chosen by himself, and the others by the assembly, which was composed of the governor, the council, and twelve delegates, to be elected annually by the freeholders. Perfect freedom in religion was established, and all were entitled to equal privileges, on taking the oaths of allegiance to the King, and of fidelity to the proprietors.

The people of Albemarle, like those in Virginia, worked in growing corn and tobacco and mainly got their limited supplies from New England. They conducted their small trade using ships from those colonies. Their growth was slow, but they were satisfied. 1667 They were given a new constitution that placed executive power in a governor, who would act with the advice of a council of twelve. Six members of the council were to be chosen by the governor, and the other six by the assembly, which included the governor, the council, and twelve delegates elected annually by the landowners. Complete freedom of religion was established, and everyone was granted equal rights as long as they took oaths of allegiance to the King and fidelity to the proprietors.

The first acts of this legislature indicate the condition and opinions of the people. It was declared that none should be sued, during five years, for any cause of action arising out of the country; and that no person should accept a power of attorney to receive debts contracted abroad.

The initial actions of this legislature reflect the views and situation of the people. It was stated that no one should be sued for any issues arising outside the country for five years; and that no individual should accept a power of attorney to collect debts incurred abroad.

1669
Constitution of Mr. Locke.

The proprietors, dissatisfied with their own systems, applied to Mr. Locke for the plan of a constitution. They supposed that this profound and acute reasoner must be deeply skilled in the science of government. In compliance with their request, he framed a body of fundamental laws which were approved and adopted. A palatine for life was to be chosen from among the proprietors, who was to act as president of the palatine court, which was to be composed of all those who were entrusted with the execution of the powers granted by the charter. A body of hereditary nobility was created, to be denominated Landgraves, and Caciques, the former to be invested with four baronies, consisting each of four thousand acres, and the latter to have two, containing each two thousand acres of land. These estates were to descend with the dignities for ever.

The owners, unhappy with their own systems, turned to Mr. Locke for a constitution plan. They assumed this insightful and clever thinker must have a deep understanding of government. In response to their request, he created a set of fundamental laws that were approved and adopted. A lifetime palatine was to be chosen from among the owners, who would act as the president of the palatine court, made up of everyone entrusted with carrying out the powers granted by the charter. A group of hereditary nobility was established, called Landgraves and Caciques; the former would be given four baronies of four thousand acres each, while the latter would receive two baronies of two thousand acres each. These estates were to pass down along with the titles forever.

The provincial legislature, denominated a Parliament was to consist of the proprietors, in the absence of any one of whom, his place was to be supplied by a deputy appointed by himself; of the nobility; and of the representatives of the freeholders, who were elected by districts. These discordant materials were to compose a single body which could initiate nothing. The bills to be laid before it were to be prepared in a grand council composed of the governor, the nobility, and the deputies of the proprietors, who were invested also with the executive power. At the end of every century, the laws were to become void without the formality of a repeal. Various judicatories were erected, and numerous minute perplexing regulations were made. This constitution, which was declared to be perpetual, soon furnished additional evidence, to the many afforded by history, of the great but neglected truth, that experience is the only safe school in which the science of government is to be acquired; and that the theories of the closet must have the stamp of practice, before they can be received with implicit confidence.

The provincial legislature, called a Parliament, was made up of the proprietors, who could be replaced by a deputy they appointed if they were absent; the nobility; and the representatives of the freeholders, elected by districts. These differing elements were supposed to come together as one body that could initiate nothing. The bills to be presented needed to be prepared by a grand council consisting of the governor, the nobility, and the deputies of the proprietors, who also held executive power. At the end of every century, the laws would expire without any formal repeal. Various courts were established, and many detailed and confusing regulations were created. This constitution, which was claimed to be permanent, soon provided further evidence, as history has shown, of the significant but often overlooked truth that experience is the only reliable teacher for learning the art of government; and that theoretical ideas must be tested through real-life practice before they can be fully trusted.

1670

The duke of Albemarle was chosen the first palatine, but did not long survive his election; and lord Berkeley was appointed his successor. The other proprietors were also named to high offices; and Mr. Locke was created a landgrave.

The Duke of Albemarle was selected as the first palatine, but he didn’t live long after his election; Lord Berkeley was appointed as his successor. The other proprietors were also given high positions, and Mr. Locke was made a landgrave.

After this change of constitution, the attention of the proprietors was first directed to the south. A settlement was made at Port Royal, under the conduct of William Sayle, who had been appointed governor of that part of the coast which lies south-west of cape Carteret. He was accompanied by Joseph West, who was intrusted with the commercial affairs of the proprietors, and who, with the governor, conducted the whole mercantile business of the colony.

After this change in governance, the proprietors initially focused their attention to the south. They established a settlement at Port Royal, led by William Sayle, who had been appointed governor of the region south-west of Cape Carteret. He was joined by Joseph West, who was responsible for the proprietors' commercial interests and, along with the governor, managed all the business operations of the colony.

William Sayle, after leading the first colony to Port Royal, and convening a parliament in which there were neither landgraves nor caciques, became the victim of the climate; after which, the authority of sir John Yeamans, who had hitherto governed the settlement at cape Fear, was extended over the territory south-west of cape Carteret. In the same year, the foundation of old Charlestown was laid, which continued, for some time, to be the capital of the southern settlements.

William Sayle, after guiding the first colony to Port Royal and organizing a parliament without landgraves or caciques, fell victim to the harsh climate. Following that, Sir John Yeamans, who had previously managed the settlement at Cape Fear, took control over the area southwest of Cape Carteret. That same year, the establishment of old Charlestown began, and it remained the capital of the southern settlements for a while.

While these exertions were making in the south, great dissatisfaction was excited in Albemarle. In 1670, Stevens, the governor, had been ordered to introduce into that settlement, the constitution prepared by Mr. Locke. This innovation was strenuously opposed; and the discontent it produced was increased by a rumour, which was not the less mischievous for being untrue, that the proprietors designed to dismember the province. There was also another cause which increased the ill humour pervading that small society. The proprietors attempted to stop the trade carried on in the vessels of New England, and the attempt produced the constant effect of such measures—much ill temper both on the part of those who carried on the traffic, and of those for whom it was conducted.

While these efforts were happening in the south, there was a lot of dissatisfaction in Albemarle. In 1670, Governor Stevens had been instructed to bring the constitution prepared by Mr. Locke to that settlement. This change faced strong opposition, and the resulting discontent was worsened by an unfounded rumor that the proprietors planned to divide the province. There was also another reason for the growing frustration within that small community. The proprietors tried to halt the trade conducted by New England ships, and this attempt had the usual outcome of such actions—causing bad feelings among both the traders and the people relying on that trade.

At length, these discontents broke out into open insurrection. The insurgents, led by Culpeper, who had been appointed surveyor-general of Carolina, obtained possession of the country, seized the revenues, and imprisoned the president, with seven deputies who had been named by the proprietors. Having taken possession of the government, they established courts of justice, appointed officers, called a parliament, and, for several years, exercised the powers of an independent state; yet they never, formally, disclaimed the power of the proprietors.

Eventually, these grievances led to an open rebellion. The rebels, led by Culpeper, who had been appointed the surveyor-general of Carolina, took control of the region, seized the revenues, and imprisoned the president along with seven deputies appointed by the proprietors. After taking charge of the government, they set up courts of law, appointed officials, called a parliament, and for several years, acted like an independent state; however, they never officially rejected the authority of the proprietors.

All this time, the titheables of Albemarle, a term designating all the men, with the negroes and Indian women, between sixteen and sixty years of age, amounted only to fourteen hundred; and the exports consisted of a few cattle, a small quantity of Indian corn, and about eight hundred thousand weight of tobacco.

All this time, the taxable residents of Albemarle—which refers to all the men, along with the Black and Native American women, aged sixteen to sixty—totaled only fourteen hundred; and the exports included a few cattle, a small amount of corn, and about eight hundred thousand pounds of tobacco.

1688

About this time, an event occurred in the southern settlements, showing as well the poverty of the people, as the manner in which the affairs of the proprietors were conducted. Joseph West, their agent, was appointed to succeed Yeamans in the government; and, the colony being unable to pay his salary, the plantation, and mercantile stock of the proprietors, were assigned to him in satisfaction of his claims.

About this time, something happened in the southern settlements that highlighted both the poverty of the people and how the proprietors managed their affairs. Joseph West, their agent, was chosen to replace Yeamans in the government. Since the colony couldn’t pay his salary, the plantation and the owners' commercial stock were given to him to settle his claims.

In England, the opinion had been long entertained that the southern colonies were adapted to the production of those articles which succeed in the warmer climates of Europe. In pursuance of this opinion, Charles, in 1679, employed two vessels to transport foreign protestants into the southern colony for the purpose of raising wine, oil, silk, and other productions of the south; and, to encourage the growth of these articles, exempted them, for a limited time, from taxation. The effort, however, did not succeed.

In England, it had long been believed that the southern colonies were suited for producing goods that thrive in warmer European climates. Following this belief, Charles, in 1679, sent two ships to bring in foreign Protestants to the southern colony to help grow wine, oil, silk, and other southern products; he also offered a temporary tax exemption to promote the growth of these goods. However, the effort was not successful.

Old Charlestown being found an inconvenient place for the seat of government, the present Charleston became the metropolis of South Carolina. This situation was deemed so unhealthy, that directions were given to search out some other position for a town. The seat of government, however, remained unaltered until the connexion with Great Britain was dissolved.

Old Charlestown was considered an inconvenient location for the government, so the current Charleston became the capital of South Carolina. This area was thought to be so unhealthy that there were instructions to look for a different spot for the town. However, the seat of government stayed the same until the connection with Great Britain was broken.

Carolina continued to increase slowly in wealth and population without any remarkable incident, except the invasion of its most southern settlement by the Spaniards from St. Augustine. This was occasioned, in part, by the jealousy with which the English colony inspired its neighbours, but was principally, and immediately attributable to the countenance given, in Charleston, to the buccaneers who then infested those seas, and who were particularly hostile to the Spaniards. It was with difficulty the colonists were prevented by the proprietors from taking ample vengeance for this injury. Their resentments, though restrained, were not extinguished; and, until the annexation of the Floridas to the British crown, these colonies continued to view each other with distrust and enmity.

Carolina continued to grow slowly in wealth and population without any significant events, except for the attack on its southern settlement by the Spaniards from St. Augustine. This was partly due to the jealousy the English colony stirred among its neighbors, but mainly because the buccaneers who were active in those waters and were particularly hostile to the Spaniards received support in Charleston. The proprietors had a hard time stopping the colonists from seeking revenge for this attack. Their anger, although held back, was not gone, and until the Floridas were added to the British crown, these colonies continued to look at each other with suspicion and hostility.

The dissatisfaction of the colony with its constitution grew with its population. After some time a settled purpose was disclosed, to thwart and oppose the wishes of the proprietors in every thing. Constitution of Mr. Locke abandoned.Wearied with a continued struggle to support a system not adapted to the condition of the people, the proprietors at length abandoned the constitution of Mr. Locke, and restored the ancient form of government.[99]

The colony's frustration with its constitution increased as its population grew. Eventually, a clear determination emerged to resist and challenge the wishes of the proprietors in everything. Mr. Locke's constitution abandoned. Exhausted from a constant fight to uphold a system that didn't fit the needs of the people, the proprietors finally gave up on Mr. Locke's constitution and reinstated the old form of government.[99]

Discontents of Virginia.

The discontents which arose in Virginia soon after the restoration, continued to augment. To the regularly decreasing price of tobacco, and the restraints imposed on commerce by the acts of navigation, other causes of dissatisfaction were soon added. Large grants of land were made to the favourites of the crown: and considerable burdens were produced, and injuries inflicted by the hostility of the Indians. Agents were deputed to remonstrate against these improvident grants, as well as to promote the views of the colony with regard to other objects of great moment; and a considerable tax was imposed to support the expense of the deputation. They are said to have been on the point of obtaining the objects of their mission, when all farther proceedings were suspended in consequence of a rebellion, which, for a time, wore a very serious aspect.

The frustrations that emerged in Virginia shortly after the restoration kept growing. On top of the declining price of tobacco and the restrictions on trade from the navigation acts, other sources of dissatisfaction quickly piled up. Large land grants were given to the crown's favorites, and significant burdens and harm resulted from the conflict with the Indians. Representatives were sent to protest against these reckless grants and to push the colony's interests on other important issues. A substantial tax was imposed to cover the costs of the delegation. They were reportedly close to achieving their goals when all further actions were halted due to a rebellion that, for a time, looked quite serious.

Bacon's rebellion.

At the head of the insurgents was colonel Nathaniel Bacon, a gentleman who had received his education, in England, at the inns of court; 1663and had been appointed a member of the council soon after his arrival in Virginia. Young, bold, and ambitious; possessing an engaging person, and commanding elocution; he was well calculated to rouse and direct the passions of the people. Treading the path by which ambition marches to power, he harangued the people on their grievances, increased their irritation against the causes of their disgust, and ascribed the evils with which they thought themselves oppressed to those who governed them, while he professed no other object than their good. He declaimed particularly against the languor with which the Indian war had been prosecuted; and, striking the note to which their feelings were most responsive, declared that, by proper exertions, it might have been already terminated.

At the forefront of the rebels was Colonel Nathaniel Bacon, a gentleman who had been educated in England at the inns of court; 1663 and had been appointed to the council shortly after arriving in Virginia. Young, bold, and ambitious; with an appealing presence and persuasive speech, he was well-suited to energize and lead the people's emotions. Following the path that ambition takes to gain power, he spoke to the people about their concerns, heightened their anger towards the reasons for their discontent, and blamed the leaders for the hardships they felt they faced, while claiming to only want what was best for them. He specifically criticized the sluggishness with which the Indian war had been waged; and, hitting the chord that resonated most with their feelings, stated that it could have already been resolved with the right efforts.

The people, viewing him as their only friend, and believing the zeal he manifested to be produced solely by his devotion to their cause gave him their whole confidence and elected him their general. In return, he assured them that he would never lay down his arms until he had avenged their sufferings on the savages, and redressed their other grievances.

The people saw him as their only friend and believed that his enthusiasm was purely driven by his commitment to their cause, so they put all their trust in him and chose him as their leader. In return, he promised them that he would never stop fighting until he had avenged their suffering against the savages and addressed their other complaints.

1676

He applied to the governor for a commission appointing him general to prosecute the war against the Indians. A temporising policy being pursued, he entered Jamestown at the head of six hundred armed men, and obtained all he demanded, from an intimidated government. No sooner had he withdrawn from the capital than the governor, at the request of the assembly which was then in session, issued a proclamation declaring him a rebel, and commanding his followers to deliver him up, and to retire to their respective homes. Bacon and his army, equally incensed at this piece of impotent indiscretion, returned to Jamestown, and the governor fled to Accomack.

He asked the governor for a commission to appoint him as a general to lead the war against the Native Americans. With a cautious approach being taken, he marched into Jamestown with six hundred armed men and got everything he requested from a frightened government. As soon as he left the capital, the governor, at the request of the assembly that was in session, issued a proclamation declaring him a rebel and ordering his followers to turn him in and go back home. Bacon and his army, equally furious at this foolish decision, returned to Jamestown, prompting the governor to flee to Accomack.

The general of the insurgents called a convention of his friends, who inveighed against the governor, for having, without cause, endeavoured to foment a civil war in the country, and after failing in this attempt, for having abdicated the government, to the great astonishment of the people. They stated farther that, the governor having informed the King "that their commander and his followers were rebellious, and having advised his majesty to send forces to reduce them, it consisted with the welfare of the colony, and with their allegiance to his sacred majesty, to oppose and suppress all forces whatsoever until the King be fully informed of the state of the case by such persons as shall be sent by Nathaniel Bacon in behalf of the people." This extraordinary manifesto was concluded with the recommendation of an oath, first taken by the members of the convention, to join the general and his army against the common enemy in all points whatever; and to endeavour to discover and apprehend such evil disposed persons as design to create a civil war by raising forces against him, and the army under his command.

The insurgent general called a meeting with his friends, who criticized the governor for trying to spark a civil war in the country without any reason. After failing in this attempt, the governor surprisingly stepped down from power, shocking the people. They further stated that the governor had informed the King that their leader and his supporters were rebellious and had advised His Majesty to send troops to defeat them. They believed it was in the colony's best interest and in line with their loyalty to the King to oppose and suppress any forces until the King received a full report on the situation from agents sent by Nathaniel Bacon on behalf of the people. This remarkable statement concluded with a recommendation for an oath, first taken by the convention members, to support the general and his army against the common enemy in every way possible and to help identify and arrest those who aimed to incite a civil war by rising up against him and the army he led.

In the mean time, the governor collected a considerable force which crossed the bay under the command of major Robert Beverly, and several sharp skirmishes were fought. A civil war was commenced; agriculture declined; Jamestown was burnt by the insurgents; those parts of the country which remained in peace were pillaged; and the wives of those who supported the government were carried to camp, where they were very harshly treated. His death.Virginia was relieved from this threatening state of things, and from the increasing calamities it portended, by the sudden death of Bacon.

In the meantime, the governor gathered a significant military force that crossed the bay led by Major Robert Beverly, and several intense skirmishes took place. A civil war began; agriculture suffered; Jamestown was burned by the rebels; areas that stayed peaceful were looted; and the wives of those who supported the government were taken to camp, where they were treated very poorly. His passing. Virginia was freed from this alarming situation and the growing disasters it threatened with the unexpected death of Bacon.

1677

Having lost their leader, the malcontents were incapable of farther agreement among themselves. They began, separately, to make terms with the government, and all opposition soon ended. Sir William Berkeley was re-instated in his authority, and an assembly was convened, which seems to have been actuated by the spirit of revenge common to those who suffer in civil contests.[100]

Having lost their leader, the dissatisfied group couldn't come to any more agreements among themselves. They started negotiating with the government separately, and all opposition quickly faded away. Sir William Berkeley was restored to his position of power, and a meeting was called that seemed driven by the desire for revenge typical of those who suffer in civil conflicts.[100]

The real motives and objects of this rebellion are not perfectly understood. Many were disposed to think that Bacon's original design extended no farther than to gratify the common resentments against the Indians, and to acquire that reputation and influence which result from conducting a popular war successfully. Others believe that he intended to seize the government. Whatever may have been his object, the insurrection produced much misery, and no good, to Virginia.[101]

The true reasons behind this rebellion aren’t completely clear. Some people thought that Bacon's initial plan was only to satisfy common anger towards the Indians and to gain the reputation and influence that comes from leading a successful popular war. Others think he aimed to take over the government. Regardless of his intentions, the uprising caused a lot of suffering and no benefits for Virginia.[101]

1680

Soon after the restoration of domestic quiet, sir William Berkeley returned to England, and was succeeded by Herbert Jeffreys, who relieved the colony from one of its complaints by making peace with the Indians.

Soon after domestic peace was restored, Sir William Berkeley returned to England and was succeeded by Herbert Jeffreys, who addressed one of the colony's issues by making peace with the Indians.

About the year 1680, an essential change was made in the jurisprudence of Virginia. In early times, the assembly was the supreme appellate court of the province. During the administration of lord Culpeper, a controversy arose between the burgesses, and counsellors, who composed also the general court, concerning the right of the latter to sit as a part of the assembly, on appeals from their own decisions. The burgesses claimed, exclusively, the privilege of judging in the last resort. Assembly deprived of judicial power.This controversy was determined by taking all judicial power from the assembly, and allowing an appeal from judgments of the general court to the King in council, where the matter in contest exceeded the value of three hundred pounds sterling.[102]

About the year 1680, a significant change occurred in the legal system of Virginia. In the early days, the assembly served as the highest appellate court in the province. During Lord Culpeper's rule, a conflict arose between the burgesses and the counselors, who were also part of the general court, regarding the latter's right to be part of the assembly when hearing appeals on their own decisions. The burgesses insisted they had the exclusive right to make final judgments. Assembly lacking judicial authority. This dispute was resolved by stripping the assembly of all judicial authority and allowing appeals from the general court's decisions to the King in council when the contested matter was worth more than three hundred pounds sterling.[102]

From the rebellion of Bacon to the revolution in 1688, the history of Virginia affords no remarkable occurrence. The low price of tobacco, that perpetual source of dissatisfaction, still continued to disquiet the country. Combinations were formed among the people to raise its value by preventing, for a time, the growth of the article; and disorderly parties assembled to destroy the tobacco plants in the beds when it was too late to sow the seed again. Violent measures were adopted to prevent these practices, and several individuals were executed.

From Bacon's rebellion to the revolution in 1688, the history of Virginia doesn't show any significant events. The low price of tobacco, which always caused dissatisfaction, continued to trouble the region. People banded together to try to increase its value by temporarily stopping its production, and unruly groups formed to destroy tobacco plants when it was too late to replant them. Harsh actions were taken to stop these practices, and several individuals were executed.

These discontents did not arrest the growth of the colony. A letter from sir William Berkeley, dated in June, 1671, states its population at forty thousand, and its militia at eight thousand. A letter from lord Culpeper in December, 1681, supposes that there might then be in the colony fifteen thousand fighting men. This calculation however is probably exaggerated, as the report of general Smith, prepared in 1680 from actual returns, represents the militia as then consisting of eight thousand five hundred and sixty-eight men, of whom thirteen hundred were cavalry.[103]

These frustrations didn’t stop the growth of the colony. A letter from Sir William Berkeley, dated June 1671, reports its population at forty thousand, with a militia of eight thousand. A letter from Lord Culpeper in December 1681 suggests there might have been fifteen thousand able-bodied men in the colony at that time. However, this estimate is likely inflated, as General Smith's report, prepared in 1680 using actual returns, states that the militia then consisted of eight thousand five hundred sixty-eight men, including thirteen hundred cavalry.[103]


CHAPTER VI.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine adjudged to Gorges.... Purchased by Massachusetts.... Royal government erected in New Hampshire.... Complaints against Massachusetts.... Their letters patent cancelled.... Death of Charles II.... James II. proclaimed.... New commission for the government of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island abrogated.... Odious measures of the new government.... Andros deposed.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of proceedings in New York and the Jerseys.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Frame of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia laid.... Assembly convened.... First acts of the legislature.... Boundary line with lord Baltimore settled.

Prosperity of New England.... War with Philip.... Edward Randolph arrives in Boston.... Maine ruled by Gorges.... Purchased by Massachusetts.... Royal government established in New Hampshire.... Complaints against Massachusetts.... Their charter canceled.... Death of Charles II.... James II. proclaimed.... New commission for the governance of New England.... Sir Edmond Andros.... The charter of Rhode Island revoked.... Unpopular actions of the new government.... Andros removed from power.... William and Mary proclaimed.... Review of events in New York and New Jersey.... Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.... Framework of government.... Foundation of Philadelphia established.... Assembly called.... Initial acts of the legislature.... Boundary line with Lord Baltimore resolved.

 

1680
Prosperity of New England.

After the departure of the commissioners, New England was for some time quiet and prosperous. The plague, the fire of London, and the discontents of the people of England, engrossed the attention of the King, and suspended the execution of his plans respecting Massachusetts. In the mean time, that colony disregarded the acts of navigation, traded as an independent state, and governed New Hampshire and Maine without opposition.[104]

After the commissioners left, New England enjoyed a period of calm and prosperity. The plague, the Great Fire of London, and the unrest among the people in England captured the King’s attention, putting his plans for Massachusetts on hold. Meanwhile, that colony ignored the navigation acts, traded as if it were an independent state, and governed New Hampshire and Maine without any resistance.[104]

War with Philip.

This state of prosperous repose was interrupted by a combination of Indians so formidable, and a war so bloody, as to threaten the war with very existence of all New England. This combination was formed by Philip, the second son of Massassoet. The father and eldest son had cultivated the friendship of the colonists; but Philip, equally brave and intelligent, saw the continuing growth of the English with apprehension, and by his conduct soon excited their suspicion. 1675He gave explicit assurances of his pacific disposition; but, from the year 1670 till 1675, when hostilities commenced, he was secretly preparing for them. The war was carried on with great vigour and various success: the savages, led by an intrepid chief, who believed that the fate of his country depended on the entire destruction of the English, made exertions of which they had not been thought capable. Several battles were fought; and all that barbarous fury which distinguishes Indian warfare, was displayed in its full extent. Wherever the Indians marched, their route was marked with murder, fire, and desolation. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Plymouth, were the greatest sufferers. In those provinces especially, the Indians were so intermingled with the whites, that there was scarcely a part of the country in perfect security, or a family which had not to bewail the loss of a relation or friend. For a considerable time no decisive advantage was gained. 1676At length, the steady efforts of the English prevailed; and in August 1676, when the tide of success was running strong in favour of the colonists, Philip, after losing his family and chief counsellors, was himself killed by one of his own nation, whom he had offended. After his death, the war was soon terminated by the submission of the Indians. Never had the people of New England been engaged in so fierce, so bloody, and so desolating a conflict. Though the warriors of the nation of which Philip was prince, were estimated at only five hundred men, he had, by alliances, increased his force to three thousand. In this estimate the eastern Indians are not included. Many houses, and flourishing villages were reduced to ashes, and six hundred persons were either killed in battle, or murdered privately.[105]

This period of prosperity was disrupted by a powerful alliance of Native Americans and a devastating war that threatened the very survival of all of New England. This alliance was led by Philip, the second son of Massasoit. His father and older brother had built a friendship with the colonists, but Philip, equally brave and intelligent, grew increasingly concerned about the English expansion and soon raised their suspicions. 1675 He assured them of his peaceful intentions, but from 1670 to 1675, before the fighting started, he was quietly preparing for war. The conflict was fought with great intensity and varying results: the Native Americans, led by a fearless chief who believed that the fate of his people depended on the total destruction of the English, put forth efforts that were previously thought to be beyond their capabilities. Numerous battles were fought, and the brutal intensity characteristic of Native American warfare was fully displayed. Wherever the Native Americans went, their path was marked by murder, fire, and devastation. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Plymouth suffered the most. In these areas, the Native Americans were so mingled with the settlers that there was hardly a part of the region safe from attack or a family that didn't mourn a lost relative or friend. For a significant time, neither side gained a decisive advantage. 1676 Eventually, the relentless efforts of the English paid off; and in August 1676, as the tide of victory shifted strongly in favor of the colonists, Philip, having lost his family and primary advisers, was killed by one of his own who he had offended. After his death, the war quickly ended with the surrender of the Native Americans. Never before had the people of New England fought in such a fierce, bloody, and destructive conflict. Although the warriors of Philip's nation were thought to number only five hundred, he had expanded his forces through alliances to three thousand. This count does not include the eastern Native Americans. Many homes and thriving villages were reduced to ashes, and six hundred people were either killed in battle or murdered privately.[105]

While this war was raging with its utmost violence, the government of Massachusetts was under the necessity of directing a part of its attention to the claims of Mason and Gorges. The efforts of Charles to procure an appearance of the colony before the council having proved ineffectual, he determined to give judgment in its absence, unless an appearance should be entered within six months. Edward Randolph.Edward Randolph, who was dispatched to give notice of this determination, arrived in Boston in the summer of 1676; and, as other letters brought by the same vessel gave assurance that this resolution would be adhered to, the general court hastened the departure of deputies to represent the colony, and support its interests.

While this war was raging at its peak, the government of Massachusetts had to focus on the claims made by Mason and Gorges. Since Charles's efforts to have the colony appear before the council were unsuccessful, he decided to make a judgment in their absence, unless they showed up within six months. Edward Randolph. Edward Randolph, who was sent to inform them of this decision, arrived in Boston in the summer of 1676. Other letters delivered by the same ship confirmed that this plan would be followed through, so the general court quickly sent deputies to represent the colony and advocate for its interests.

Maine adjudged to Gorges.

It was the opinion of the King in council that the line of Massachusetts did not run more than three miles north of the Merrimack; and Maine was adjudged to Gorges. The claim of Mason to New Hampshire being confined to the soil, all title to which, though so long exercised, was now waived by Massachusetts; and the terre-tenants not being before the court, that part of the case was decided so far only as respected the boundary of Massachusetts, which, being against the pretensions of that colony, its jurisdiction over New Hampshire ceased. Charles had been for some time treating for the purchase both of New Hampshire and Maine which he intended to bestow on his favourite son, the duke of Monmouth, but his poverty had prevented the contract. Massachusetts, though not ignorant of this fact, finding that the decision respecting Maine would be in favour of Gorges, purchased his title for twelve hundred pounds sterling. The offended monarch insisted on a relinquishment of the contract; but Massachusetts, apologising for what had been done, retained the purchase, and governed the country as a subordinate province.[106]

The King and his council believed that the boundary of Massachusetts extended no more than three miles north of the Merrimack River, and Maine was granted to Gorges. Mason's claim to New Hampshire was limited to the land itself, which although long held, was now surrendered by Massachusetts. Since the landowners were not present in court, this part of the case only addressed the boundaries of Massachusetts, which, going against the claims of that colony, meant that its jurisdiction over New Hampshire ended. For a while, Charles had been negotiating to buy both New Hampshire and Maine, intending to give them to his favorite son, the Duke of Monmouth, but his financial issues had stopped the deal. Massachusetts, aware of this, saw that the decision about Maine would favor Gorges, so they bought his title for twelve hundred pounds sterling. The displeased king demanded that the contract be canceled, but Massachusetts, while apologizing for the situation, kept the purchase and governed the area as a subordinate province.[106]

1679
Royal government in New Hampshire.

New Hampshire having become a distinct colony, a royal government was erected in that province; the legislature of which voted an affectionate address to Massachusetts, avowing a willingness to have retained their ancient connexion, had such been the pleasure of their common sovereign.

New Hampshire became its own colony, and a royal government was established there. The legislature voted to send a warm message to Massachusetts, expressing a desire to maintain their longstanding connection, if that had been the wish of their shared ruler.

The temper and conduct of Massachusetts remaining unchanged, the charges against its government were renewed. The complaints of the Quakers were perseveringly urged; and the neglect of the acts of navigation, constituted a serious accusation against the colony. The general court, in a letter to their agents, declared these acts "to be an invasion of the rights, liberty, and property of the subjects of his majesty in the colony, they not being represented in Parliament." But as his majesty had signified his pleasure that they should be conformed to, "they had made provision by a law of the colony that they should be strictly attended to from time to time, although it greatly discouraged trade, and was a great damage to his majesty's plantation." Their agents gave correct information of the state of things in England, and assured them that only a fair compliance with the regulations respecting trade could secure them from an open breach with the crown. These honest representations produced the usual effect of unwelcome truths. They diminished the popularity of the agents, and excited a suspicion in Boston that they had not supported the interests of the colony with sufficient zeal. On their return, they brought with them a letter containing the requisitions of the King; and were soon followed by Randolph, who had been appointed collector at Boston. The general court began to manifest some disposition to appease their sovereign, and passed several laws for this purpose; but still declined complying with his directions to send agents with full powers to attend to the new ordering of the province; and the collector encountered insuperable obstacles in his attempts to execute the laws of trade. Almost every suit he instituted for the recovery of penalties or forfeitures was decided against him, at the costs of the prosecutor. These difficulties induced him to return to England, to solicit additional powers, which were equally disregarded.

The attitude and behavior of Massachusetts remained the same, so the accusations against its government were brought up again. The complaints from the Quakers were pushed continuously, and the disregard for navigation laws was a serious charge against the colony. The general court, in a letter to their representatives, stated that these laws "were an invasion of the rights, liberty, and property of the king's subjects in the colony, as they were not represented in Parliament." However, since his majesty had expressed his desire for them to be followed, "they had put in place a law in the colony to ensure they were strictly enforced, even though it significantly hurt trade and was a considerable setback for his majesty's plantation." Their representatives provided accurate information about the situation in England and assured them that only a genuine adherence to the trade regulations could prevent a direct conflict with the crown. These honest insights led to the typical reaction to uncomfortable truths. They diminished the representatives' popularity and raised suspicions in Boston that they hadn’t been diligent enough in protecting the colony's interests. Upon their return, they brought back a letter outlining the King’s requirements and were soon joined by Randolph, who had been appointed collector in Boston. The general court began to show some willingness to appease their sovereign and passed several laws for this reason; however, they still refused to follow his orders to send agents with full authority to address the new management of the province, and the collector faced insurmountable challenges in implementing the trade laws. Almost every case he brought forward to recover penalties or forfeitures was ruled against him, with costs falling on the prosecutor. These challenges led him to go back to England to request additional powers, which were ultimately ignored as well.

The complaints of the King on these subjects were answered by professions of loyalty, and by partial compliances with the demands of the crown; but the main subject of contest remained unaltered.

The King's complaints about these issues were met with expressions of loyalty and some concessions to the crown's demands; however, the main point of conflict stayed the same.

1684

At length, being convinced that the King was determined to annul the charter, Massachusetts so far yielded to his will, as to appoint agents to represent the colony. But persons empowered to submit to such regulations as might be made by government, were, in other words, persons appointed to surrender the charter. They were therefore instructed not to do, or consent to, any thing that might infringe the liberties granted by charter, or the government established thereby. These powers were declared to be insufficient; and the agents were informed that, unless others, in every respect satisfactory, should be immediately obtained, it was his majesty's pleasure that a quo warranto should be issued without delay. This unpleasant intelligence was immediately communicated to the general court, accompanied with information of the proceedings which had lately taken place in England. In that country, many corporations had surrendered their charters; and, on the refusal of London, a quo warranto had issued against the city, which had been decided in favour of the crown. The question whether it was advisable to submit to his majesty's pleasure, or to permit the quo warranto to issue, was seriously referred to the general court, and was as seriously taken into consideration throughout the colony. In concurrence with the common sentiment, the general court determined that "it was better to die by other hands than their own." On receiving this final resolution, the fatal writ was issued, and was committed to the care of Randolph, who brought also a declaration of the King, that if the colony, before the writ should be prosecuted, would submit to his pleasure, he would regulate their charter for his service, and their good; and would make no farther alterations in it than should be necessary for the support of his government in the province. The governor and assistants passed a vote of submission; but, the deputies refusing their assent thereto, the high court of chancery, in Trinity term 1684, decreed against the governor and company, "that their letters patent, and the enrolment thereof be cancelled."

Eventually, convinced that the King was set on canceling the charter, Massachusetts reluctantly agreed to appoint agents to represent the colony. However, those authorized to accept any regulations implemented by the government were, in essence, appointed to give up the charter. They were instructed not to do anything or agree to anything that might violate the liberties granted by the charter or the government established under it. These authorities were declared insufficient, and the agents were told that unless satisfactory replacements were obtained immediately, the king wanted a quo warranto issued without delay. This unfortunate news was quickly conveyed to the general court, along with updates on recent events in England. There, many corporations had surrendered their charters, and when London refused, a quo warranto was issued against the city, ruling in favor of the crown. The general court seriously discussed whether it was wise to submit to the king's wishes or allow the quo warranto to proceed, and this was given careful consideration throughout the colony. Aligning with the common viewpoint, the general court decided that "it was better to die by other hands than their own." Upon receiving this final decision, the fatal writ was issued and entrusted to Randolph, who also brought a declaration from the King stating that if the colony submitted to his wishes before the writ was enforced, he would adjust their charter for his service and their benefit, making no further changes than necessary for his government in the province. The governor and assistants voted to submit, but the deputies refused their approval, leading the high court of chancery, in Trinity term 1684, to rule against the governor and company, stating that their letters patent and the enrollment of it should be canceled.

1685
Death of Charles II. James II. proclaimed.

Charles did not survive this decree long enough to complete his system respecting the New England colonies, or to establish a new government for Massachusetts. He died early in the following year; and his successor, from whose stern temper, and high toned opinions, the most gloomy presages had been drawn, was proclaimed, in Boston, with melancholy pomp.

Charles didn't live long enough to finish his plans for the New England colonies or to set up a new government for Massachusetts. He died early the next year; his successor, known for his strict demeanor and strong opinions—which led to dark predictions—was announced in Boston with somber ceremony.

Their presages were soon verified. Immediately after James had ascended the throne, a commission was issued for a president and council, as a temporary government for Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Narraghansetts; whose powers were entirely executive and judicial. 1686This commission reached Boston in May, and was laid before the general court, not as a body invested with political authority, but as one composed of individuals of the first respectability and influence in the province. The general court agreed unanimously to an address, in answer to this communication, declaring "that the liberty of the subject is abridged, by the new system, both in matters of legislation and in laying taxes; and that it highly concerns them to whom it is directed to consider whether it be safe;" and added "that, if the newly appointed officers, mean to take upon themselves the government of the people, though they could not give their assent thereto, they should demean themselves as loyal subjects, and humbly make their addresses to God, and, in due time, to their gracious prince, for relief."

Their predictions were soon proven correct. Right after James took the throne, a commission was issued for a president and council to serve as a temporary government for Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, and Narragansett; their powers were completely executive and judicial. 1686This commission arrived in Boston in May and was presented to the general court, not as a body with political authority, but as a group made up of highly respected and influential individuals in the province. The general court unanimously agreed to send a response to this communication, stating "that the liberty of the subject is restricted by the new system, both regarding legislation and taxation; and that it is crucial for those it concerns to consider whether this is safe;" and added "that, if the newly appointed officers intend to assume control over the people, even though they cannot give their consent to it, they should act as loyal subjects and humbly direct their addresses to God, and, in due time, to their gracious prince, for relief."

Mr. Dudley, the president named in the commission, was a native of Massachusetts, and seems to have mingled with his respect for the constitutional prerogative of the crown, a due regard for the rights of the people. Any immediate alterations, therefore, in the interior arrangements of the country were avoided; and the commissioners transmitted a memorial to the lords of the council for the colonies, stating the necessity of a well regulated assembly to represent the people, and soliciting an abatement of the taxes. This moderate conduct did not accord with the wishes of that class of men who court power wherever it may be placed. These sought the favour of their sovereign by prostrating every obstacle to the execution of his will; and soon transmitted complaints to administration, charging the commissioners with conniving at violations of the laws respecting trade, and countenancing ancient principles in religion and government.

Mr. Dudley, the president mentioned in the commission, was from Massachusetts and seemed to balance his respect for the crown's constitutional authority with a genuine concern for the people's rights. Therefore, he avoided any immediate changes to the country's internal structure. The commissioners sent a formal request to the colonial council, highlighting the need for a properly organized assembly to represent the people and asking for a reduction in taxes. This reasonable approach didn’t sit well with those who seek power wherever it can be found. These individuals tried to win the favor of their ruler by removing any obstacles to his wishes and quickly sent complaints to the government, accusing the commissioners of ignoring trade laws and supporting outdated religious and governmental principles.

Sir Edmond Andros.

James was dissatisfied with the conduct of his commissioners; and was also of opinion that a wise policy required a consolidation of the colonies, and a permanent administration for New England. With a view to this object, he appointed Sir Edmond Andros, who had governed New York, captain-general and vice-admiral of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, New Plymouth, Pemaquid, and Narraghansetts; and empowered him, with the consent of a council to be appointed by the crown, to make ordinances not inconsistent with the laws of the realm, which should be submitted to the King for his approbation or dissent; and to impose taxes for the support of government.

James was unhappy with how his commissioners were acting and believed that a smart approach needed a unification of the colonies and a permanent government for New England. To achieve this, he appointed Sir Edmond Andros, who had previously governed New York, as the captain-general and vice-admiral of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, New Plymouth, Pemaquid, and the Narragansetts. He gave him the authority, with the approval of a council to be appointed by the crown, to create ordinances that wouldn't conflict with the realm's laws, which would be sent to the King for his approval or rejection, and to levy taxes to support the government.

In December 1685, Andros arrived at Boston, where he was received with the respect which was due to the representative of the crown. In pursuance of his orders, he dissolved the government of Rhode Island, broke its seal, and assumed the administration of the colony. In the preceding year, articles of high misdemeanour had been exhibited against that colony and referred to Sayer, the attorney general, with orders to issue a writ of quo warranto to annul their patent. The assembly stopped farther proceedings, by passing an act formally surrendering their charter. Their submission, however, availed them nothing. Their fate was involved in that of Massachusetts.[107]

In December 1685, Andros arrived in Boston, where he was welcomed with the respect that was due to a representative of the crown. Following his orders, he dissolved the government of Rhode Island, broke its seal, and took control of the colony. In the previous year, accusations of serious wrongdoing had been brought against that colony and sent to Sayer, the attorney general, with instructions to issue a writ of quo warranto to revoke their charter. The assembly halted any further action by passing a law that formally surrendered their charter. However, their submission didn’t help them at all. Their fate was linked to that of Massachusetts.[107]

Odious measures of government.

In pursuance of the determination to break the charters and unite the colonies, articles of misdemeanour had been also exhibited against the governor and company of Connecticut, on which a writ of quo warranto had been issued. The government of that colony addressed a letter to the secretary of state, desiring, with many professions of loyalty, to remain in its present situation; but, if it should be the purpose of his majesty to dispose otherwise of them, submitting to his royal commands, and requesting to be annexed to Massachusetts. No farther proceedings were had on the quo warranto, and Andros was ordered to accept the submission of the colony, and annex it to Massachusetts. 1687This order was executed in October, when Andros appeared in Hartford at the head of a small corps of regular troops, demanded the charter, and declared the government to be dissolved. The colony submitted, but the charter was concealed in a tree, which was venerated long afterwards and is still in existence.[108]

In an effort to break the charters and unite the colonies, charges were also brought against the governor and company of Connecticut, which led to a writ of quo warranto. The government of that colony sent a letter to the secretary of state, expressing their loyalty and desire to maintain their current status; however, if it was King James's intention to change that, they would comply with his royal orders and request to be annexed to Massachusetts. No further action was taken on the quo warranto, and Andros was instructed to accept the colony's submission and incorporate it into Massachusetts. 1687 This order was carried out in October, when Andros showed up in Hartford with a small group of regular troops, demanded the charter, and declared the government dissolved. The colony complied, but the charter was hidden in a tree, which became a revered symbol and still exists today.[108]

The grand legislative council, composed of individuals selected by the crown throughout the united colonies, readily assembled, and proceeded to execute the duties assigned to it.

The grand legislative council, made up of people chosen by the crown from across the united colonies, quickly gathered and began to carry out the tasks assigned to it.

The measures of the new government were not calculated to diminish the odium excited by its objectionable form. The fees of office were enormous; and the regulations respecting divine worship, marriages, the acts of navigation, and taxes, were deemed highly oppressive. In addition to these causes of discontent, the governor general took occasion to cast a doubt on the validity of the titles by which lands were holden.

The new government's actions only fueled the resentment towards its unpopular structure. The official fees were outrageous, and the rules about religious practices, marriage, shipping, and taxes were seen as extremely burdensome. On top of this, the governor general raised questions about the legitimacy of the land titles.

1688

To obtain relief from these oppressive grievances, Mather, an eminent politician and divine, was deputed by the colonies of New England to lay their complaints before the King. He was graciously received, but could effect no substantial change in the colonial administration. James had determined to reduce all the governments, proprietary as well as royal, to an immediate dependence on the crown; and, to effect this purpose, had directed writs of quo warranto to issue against those charters which still remained in force. This plan was adopted, not only for the purpose of establishing his favourite system of government, but also of forming a barrier to the encroachments of France, by combining the force of the colonies as far as the Delaware. During this reign, Canada was pushed south of Lake Champlain; and fortresses were erected within the immense forests which then separated that province from New York and New England. With a view to this union of force, a new commission was made out for Andros, annexing New York and the Jerseys to his government, and appointing Francis Nicholson his lieutenant.

To address these heavy grievances, Mather, a prominent politician and minister, was sent by the New England colonies to present their complaints to the King. He was welcomed, but he couldn’t bring about any significant changes in colonial governance. James had decided to bring all governments, both proprietary and royal, under direct control of the crown; and to accomplish this, he ordered writs of quo warranto to be issued against the charters that were still valid. This plan was adopted not only to establish his preferred system of governance but also to create a defense against the expansions of France by uniting the colonies as far as Delaware. During this reign, Canada was pushed south of Lake Champlain, and forts were built in the vast forests that separated that province from New York and New England. To facilitate this combined effort, a new commission was issued for Andros, adding New York and New Jersey to his governance and appointing Francis Nicholson as his lieutenant.

1689

The dissatisfaction of the people continued to increase; and every act of the government, even those which were in themselves laudable, was viewed through the medium of prejudice.

The people's dissatisfaction kept growing, and every action taken by the government, even those that were actually commendable, was seen through a lens of bias.

At length these latent ill humours burst forth into action. Some vague intelligence was received concerning the proceedings of the Prince of Orange in England. The old magistrates and leading men silently wished, and secretly prayed, that success might attend him, but determined to commit nothing unnecessarily to hazard, and quietly to await an event, which no movement of theirs could accelerate or retard.

At last, these hidden bad feelings erupted into action. Some unclear news came in about the Prince of Orange's actions in England. The older officials and prominent figures silently hoped, and secretly prayed, for his success, but decided not to take any unnecessary risks and to quietly wait for an outcome that their actions could neither speed up nor slow down.

Andros deposed.

The people were less prudent. Stung with the recollection of past injuries, their impatience, on the first prospect of relief, could not be restrained. On the 18th of April, without any apparent pre-concerted plan, a sudden insurrection broke out in Boston, and about fifty of the most unpopular individuals, including the governors, were seized and imprisoned; and the government was once more placed in the hands of the ancient magistrates. William and Mary proclaimed.All apprehensions of danger from this precipitate measure were soon quieted by the information that William and Mary had been crowned King and Queen of England. They were immediately proclaimed in Boston with unusual pomp, and with demonstrations of proclaimed unaffected joy.[109]

The people were less cautious. Hurt by the memories of past wrongs, their impatience couldn’t be held back at the first chance of relief. On April 18th, without any clear plan, a sudden uprising happened in Boston, and about fifty of the least popular people, including the governors, were captured and imprisoned; the government was once again handed to the old officials. William and Mary declared. All fears of danger from this rash action were quickly calmed by the news that William and Mary had been crowned King and Queen of England. They were immediately announced in Boston with great fanfare and signs of genuine joy.[109]

The example of Massachusetts was quickly followed by Connecticut and Rhode Island. Andros was no sooner known to be in prison than he was deposed also in Connecticut; and, in both colonies the ancient form of government was restored.

The example of Massachusetts was quickly followed by Connecticut and Rhode Island. As soon as Andros was known to be in prison, he was also removed from power in Connecticut; and in both colonies, the old form of government was restored.

In New Hampshire a convention was called, which determined to re-annex that colony to Massachusetts, and deputies were elected to represent them in the general court. This reunion continued to be their wish, but was opposed by the King, who, in 1692, appointed for it a distinct governor.

In New Hampshire, a convention was held to rejoin that colony with Massachusetts, and representatives were elected to bring their concerns to the general court. This desire for reunion remained strong, but the King opposed it and, in 1692, appointed a separate governor for New Hampshire.

In order to bring the affairs of the middle colonies to this period, it will be necessary briefly to review the transactions of several years.

To update the situation in the middle colonies to this time, we need to quickly look back at the events of several years.

Review of proceedings in New York and New Jersey.

The treaty of Breda, which restored Acadié to France, confirmed New Netherlands to England. Quiet possession of that valuable territory was retained until 1673, when, England being engaged again in war with Holland, a small Dutch squadron appeared before the fort at New York, which surrendered without firing a shot. The example was followed by the city and country; and, in a few days, the submission of New Netherlands was complete. After this acquisition the old claim to Long Island was renewed, and some attempts were made to wrest it from Connecticut. That province however, after consulting its confederates, and finding that offensive operations would be agreeable to the union, declared war against the Dutch; and not content with defending its own possessions, prepared an expedition against New York. The termination of the war between England and Holland prevented its prosecution, and restored to the English the possessions they had lost.[110]

The Treaty of Breda, which returned Acadié to France, confirmed New Netherlands to England. England maintained quiet control of that valuable territory until 1673, when, while at war with Holland again, a small Dutch squadron showed up at the fort in New York, which surrendered without firing a shot. The city and the surrounding area quickly followed suit, and within a few days, New Netherlands was completely submitted. After gaining this territory, the old claim to Long Island was revived, and there were some attempts to take it from Connecticut. However, that province, after discussing with its allies and realizing that offensive actions would be agreeable to the alliance, declared war on the Dutch; and not satisfied with just defending its own land, it prepared an expedition against New York. The end of the war between England and Holland halted those plans and restored the lost possessions to the English.[110]

To remove all controversy concerning his title, which had been acquired while the granted lands were in possession of the Dutch, the duke of York, after the peace of 1674, obtained a renewal of his patent, and appointed sir Edmond Andros governor of his territories in America. This commission included New Jersey, his former grant of which he supposed to be annulled by the conquest thereof in 1673. Andros, disregarding the decision of the commissioners, claimed for the duke that part of Connecticut which lies west of the river of that name; and, during the war with Philip, endeavoured to support his claim by force. The determined resistance of Connecticut compelled him to relinquish an attempt on Saybrooke; after which he returned to New York. The taxes which had been laid by the Dutch were collected, and duties, for a limited time, were imposed, by authority of the duke. This proceeding excited great discontent. The public resentment was directed, first against the governor, whose conduct was inquired into and approved by his master, and afterwards against the collector, who was seized and sent to England; but never prosecuted. The representatives of the duke in New York, feeling the difficulty of governing a high spirited people on principles repugnant to all their settled opinions, repeatedly, but ineffectually, urged him to place the colony on the same footing with its neighbours, by creating a local legislature, one branch of which should be elected by the people. It was not until the year 1683, when the revenue laws were about to expire, when the right of the duke to re-enact them was denied in America, and doubted in England, that he could be prevailed on to appoint a new governor with instructions to convene an assembly.[111]

To clear up any disputes regarding his title, which he got while the Dutch were in control of the lands, the Duke of York, after the peace of 1674, secured a renewal of his patent and appointed Sir Edmond Andros as governor of his territories in America. This commission included New Jersey, which he thought had been annulled by its conquest in 1673. Andros, ignoring the commissioners' decision, claimed for the duke the part of Connecticut that lies west of its river and tried to back his claim by force during the war with Philip. The strong resistance from Connecticut forced him to abandon his attempt on Saybrooke and return to New York. The taxes imposed by the Dutch were collected, and new duties were temporarily imposed with the duke’s authority. This caused significant unrest. The public's anger was initially directed at the governor, whose actions were investigated and approved by the duke, and later at the collector, who was seized and sent to England but was never prosecuted. The duke’s representatives in New York, sensing the challenge of governing a spirited people against their existing beliefs, repeatedly, though unsuccessfully, urged him to align the colony with its neighbors by establishing a local legislature, with one elected branch. It wasn't until 1683, when the revenue laws were about to run out and the duke's right to renew them was disputed in America and questioned in England, that he finally agreed to appoint a new governor with instructions to convene an assembly.[111]

In 1674, lord Berkeley assigned his interest in the Jerseys to William Penn and his associates. They afterwards acquired the title of sir George Carteret also, and immediately conveyed one-half of their interest to the earl of Perth and others, who, in 1683, obtained a conveyance from the duke of York directly to themselves.

In 1674, Lord Berkeley handed over his stake in the Jerseys to William Penn and his partners. They later also acquired the title of Sir George Carteret and quickly transferred half of their stake to the Earl of Perth and others, who, in 1683, received a direct conveyance from the Duke of York to themselves.

During these transactions, continual efforts were made to re-annex the Jerseys to New York. Carteret had endeavoured to participate in the advantages of commerce by establishing a port at Amboy; but Andros seized and condemned the vessels trading thither, and was supported by the duke in this exercise of power. The assembly of New York claimed the right of taxing the people of Jersey; and the collector, continued to exercise his former authority within their territory. On his complaining, after the accession of the duke of York to the throne, that every vessel he prosecuted was discharged by the verdict of the jury, a writ of quo warranto was directed. The English judges did not then hold their offices during good behaviour; and the proprietors of East Jersey, confident that the cause would be decided against them, surrendered their patent to the crown, praying only a grant of the soil. The Jerseys were, soon afterwards, annexed to New England.[112]

During these transactions, there were ongoing efforts to bring the Jerseys back under New York. Carteret tried to take advantage of trade by setting up a port at Amboy, but Andros took control of and condemned the ships trading there, and the duke backed him in this use of power. The New York assembly claimed the right to tax the people of Jersey, and the collector continued to enforce his previous authority within their territory. After the duke of York became king, he complained that every ship he went after was released by the jury's decision, leading to a writ of quo warranto. At that time, English judges didn't hold their positions based on good behavior; the proprietors of East Jersey, believing they would lose their case, gave up their patent to the crown, only asking for a grant of the land. The Jerseys were soon after added to New England.[112]

Dongan, who, in 1683, had succeeded Andros in the government of New York, took a deep interest in the affairs of the five nations, who had been engaged in bloody wars with Canada. The French, by establishing a settlement at Detroit, and a fort at Michilimackinack, had been enabled to extend their commerce among the numerous tribes of Indians who hunted on the banks of the great lakes, and the upper branches of the Mississippi. They excluded the people of New York from any share in this gainful commerce; in consequence of which Dongan solicited and obtained permission to aid the five nations. This order, however, was soon countermanded; and a treaty was concluded, stipulating that no assistance should be given to the savages by the English colonists; soon after which Dongan was recalled, and New York was annexed to New England.

Dongan, who took over the leadership of New York in 1683 after Andros, was very involved in the issues facing the five nations, who were fighting brutal wars with Canada. The French had set up a settlement in Detroit and a fort in Michilimackinack, which allowed them to expand their trade with the many Native American tribes that hunted along the Great Lakes and the upper Mississippi River. They kept the people of New York from participating in this profitable trade, leading Dongan to request and receive permission to support the five nations. However, this order was quickly revoked, and a treaty was established that prohibited English colonists from helping the Native Americans. Shortly after, Dongan was removed from his position, and New York was added to New England.

From the accession of James to the throne, he had discontinued the assemblies of New York, and empowered the governor, with the consent of his council, to make laws "as near as might be" to those of England. The reinstatement of this arbitrary system gave general disgust, and, together with the apprehension that the Roman Catholic religion would be established, prepared the people of New York, as well as those of the other colonies, for that revolution which wrested power from hands accustomed to abuse it. On receiving intelligence of the revolution at Boston, the militia were raised by a captain Jacob Leisler, who took possession of the fort in the name of King William, and drove Nicholson, the lieutenant governor, out of the country. This event gave rise to two parties, who long divided New York, and whose mutual animosities were the source of much uneasiness and mischief to the province.[113]

From the moment James came to the throne, he ended the assemblies in New York and gave the governor, with his council's approval, the authority to make laws "as close as possible" to those of England. The return of this arbitrary system upset many people and, along with fears of the Roman Catholic religion being established, prepared the people of New York and the other colonies for the revolution that took power from those who often misused it. When news of the revolution in Boston reached them, Captain Jacob Leisler rallied the militia, took control of the fort in the name of King William, and forced Lieutenant Governor Nicholson out of the area. This led to the creation of two factions that long divided New York, and their ongoing conflicts caused a lot of trouble and unrest in the province.[113]

Pennsylvania granted to William Penn.

William Penn having gained some knowledge of the country west of the Delaware, formed the design of acquiring that territory as a separate estate. On his petition, a charter was issued in 1681, granting to him, in absolute property, by the name of Pennsylvania, that tract of country bounded on the east by the river Delaware, extending westward five degrees of longitude, stretching to the north from twelve miles north of New Castle to the forty-third degree of latitude, and limited on the south by a circle of twelve miles, drawn round New Castle to the beginning of the fortieth degree of latitude.

William Penn, having learned about the land west of the Delaware, planned to acquire that area as a distinct estate. In response to his request, a charter was issued in 1681, granting him full ownership of the territory named Pennsylvania. This region was bounded on the east by the Delaware River, extending westward for five degrees of longitude, stretching north from twelve miles above New Castle to the forty-third degree of latitude, and limited on the south by a circle of twelve miles drawn around New Castle up to the fortieth degree of latitude.

In this charter, the acts of navigation were recognised, a local legislature was created, and provision made that a duplicate of its laws should be transmitted, within five years, to the King in council; any of which that were repugnant to those of England, or inconsistent with the authority of the crown, might be declared void in six months. This charter conveyed nearly the same powers and privileges with that of Maryland, but recognised the right of Parliament to tax the colony.

In this charter, the navigation laws were acknowledged, a local legislature was established, and it was stipulated that a copy of its laws should be sent to the King in council within five years; any laws that conflicted with those of England or undermined the crown's authority could be declared invalid within six months. This charter granted almost the same powers and privileges as that of Maryland, but acknowledged Parliament's right to tax the colony.

Penn soon commenced the settlement of the province, and immediately asserted a claim to a part of the territory which had been supposed by lord Baltimore to be within the bounds of Maryland. In this claim originated a controversy between the two proprietors, productive of considerable inconvenience and irritation to both.

Penn soon began settling the province and quickly claimed a portion of the land that Lord Baltimore believed was part of Maryland. This claim sparked a dispute between the two landowners, causing significant inconvenience and irritation for both of them.

He published a frame of government for Pennsylvania, the chief intention of which was declared to be "for the support of power in reverence with the people, and to secure the people from the abuse of power; that they may be free by their just obedience, and the magistrates honourable for their just administration; for liberty without obedience is confusion, and obedience without liberty is slavery."

He published a government framework for Pennsylvania, stating that its main purpose was "to uphold power in a way that respects the people and to protect the people from the misuse of power; so they can be free through their rightful obedience, and the leaders respected for their fair governance; because liberty without obedience leads to chaos, and obedience without liberty is slavery."

This scheme of fundamental law contains many provisions indicating good sense and just notions of government, but was too complex for an infant settlement; and, after many fruitless attempts to amend it, was laid aside, and a more simple form was adopted, resembling in its principal features, those established in the other colonies, which remained until the proprietary government itself was dissolved.

This system of fundamental law has a lot of rules that show good judgment and fair ideas about government, but it was too complicated for a new settlement. After several unsuccessful tries to fix it, it was abandoned, and a simpler version was put in place, similar to what was established in the other colonies, which stayed in effect until the proprietary government was dissolved.

In August 1682, Penn obtained from the duke of York a conveyance of the town of New Castle, with the territory twelve miles around it, and that tract of land extending thence southward, on the Delaware, to cape Henlopen. Soon after this grant was issued, he embarked for America, accompanied by about two thousand emigrants; and, in the October following, landed on the banks of the Delaware. In addition to the colonists sent out by himself, he found, on his arrival several small settlements of Swedes, Dutch, Finlanders, and English, amounting to about three thousand persons. Penn cultivated the good will of the natives, from whom he purchased such lands as were necessary for the present use of the colonists. Foundation of Philadelphia.At this time the foundation of Philadelphia was laid, which we are assured contained near one hundred houses within twelve months from its commencement. An assembly was convened which, instead of being composed of all the freemen, according to the frame of government, was, at the request of the people themselves, constituted of their representatives. Among the laws which were enacted was one annexing the territories lately purchased from the duke of York to the province, and extending to them all its privileges. Universal freedom in religion was established; and every foreigner who promised allegiance to the King, and obedience to the proprietor was declared a freeman.[114]

In August 1682, Penn received a transfer of the town of New Castle from the duke of York, along with the territory extending twelve miles around it and the land stretching south on the Delaware to Cape Henlopen. Shortly after this grant was issued, he set off for America with about two thousand emigrants; by October, he arrived on the banks of the Delaware. Besides the colonists he sent, he found several small settlements of Swedes, Dutch, Finns, and English, totaling around three thousand people. Penn gained the goodwill of the natives, from whom he purchased the necessary land for the current needs of the colonists. Founding of Philadelphia. At this time, Philadelphia was founded, reportedly having nearly one hundred houses within twelve months of its start. An assembly was called that, instead of being made up of all the freemen as per the government framework, was formed with representatives at the request of the people themselves. Among the laws enacted was one that attached the territories recently acquired from the duke of York to the province, granting them all its privileges. Universal freedom of religion was established, and any foreigner who swore allegiance to the King and obedience to the proprietor was declared a freeman.[114]

In the hope of extending his limits to the Chesapeake, Penn, soon after his arrival, met lord Baltimore for the purpose of adjusting their boundaries. The patent of that nobleman calls for the fortieth degree of north latitude, and he proposed to determine the intersection of that degree with the Delaware by actual observation. Penn, on the contrary, insisted on finding the fortieth degree by mensuration from the capes of Virginia, the true situation of which had been already ascertained. Each adhering firmly to his own proposition, the controversy was referred to the committee of plantations, who, after the crown had descended on James, decided that the peninsula between the bays of Chesapeake and Delaware, should be divided into two equal parts by a line drawn from the latitude of cape Henlopen to the fortieth degree, and adjudged that the land lying from that line towards the Delaware should belong to his majesty, and the other moiety to Lord Baltimore. This adjudication was ordered to be immediately executed.

In hopes of expanding his territory to the Chesapeake, Penn, shortly after he arrived, met with Lord Baltimore to sort out their boundaries. The patent held by Baltimore specifies the fortieth degree of north latitude, and he suggested figuring out where that degree intersects with the Delaware through actual observation. Penn, on the other hand, argued for determining the fortieth degree by measuring from the Virginia capes, which had already been accurately mapped. Each stuck firmly to his stance, so the dispute was sent to the committee of plantations. After the crown passed to James, they decided that the peninsula between the Chesapeake and Delaware bays would be split into two equal parts by a line drawn from the latitude of Cape Henlopen to the fortieth degree. It was ruled that the land on the Delaware side of that line would belong to the king, while the other half would go to Lord Baltimore. This decision was ordered to be carried out immediately.

Pennsylvania was slow in acknowledging the Prince and Princess of Orange. The government continued to be administered in the name of James for some time after his abdication was known. At length, however, William and Mary were proclaimed; and Penn had the address to efface the unfavourable impressions which this delay was calculated to make on them.

Pennsylvania was slow to recognize the Prince and Princess of Orange. The government continued to operate in the name of James for some time after his abdication became known. Eventually, however, William and Mary were proclaimed; and Penn managed to smooth over the negative impressions that this delay was likely to create about them.


CHAPTER VII.

New charter of Massachusetts.... Affairs of New York.... War with France.... Schenectady destroyed.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Against Quebec.... Acadié recovered by France.... Pemaquid taken.... Attempt on St. Johns.... Peace.... Affairs of New York.... Of Virginia.... Disputes between England and France respecting boundary in America.... Recommencement of hostilities.... Quotas of the respective colonies.... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Incursion into Massachusetts.... Plan for the invasion of Canada.... Port Royal taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Treaty of Utrecht.... Affairs of New York.... Of Carolina.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Attempt to establish the Episcopal church.... Invasion of the colony.... Bills of credit issued.... Legislature continues itself.... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians.... Tuscaroras defeated.... Scheme of a Bank.

New charter for Massachusetts.... Issues in New York.... War with France.... Schenectady destroyed.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Attack on Quebec.... Acadia reclaimed by France.... Pemaquid captured.... Attempt on St. Johns.... Peace.... Issues in New York.... Virginia.... Disputes between England and France over boundaries in America.... Renewed fighting.... Quotas for the various colonies.... Treaty of neutrality between France and the five nations.... Expedition against Port Royal.... Incursion into Massachusetts.... Plan to invade Canada.... Port Royal captured.... Expedition against Quebec.... Treaty of Utrecht.... Issues in New York.... In Carolina.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Attempt to establish the Episcopal church.... Invasion of the colony.... Bills of credit issued.... Legislature persists .... Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians.... Tuscaroras defeated.... Proposal for a Bank.

 

1689

The revolution which placed the Prince and Princess of Orange on the throne, revived in Massachusetts, the hope of recovering the ancient charter. Elections were held by authority of the temporary government, and the representatives requested the council to exercise, until orders should be received from England, the powers and authorities vested in that body by the charter. The council acceded to this proposition; and the ancient system was re-established. It was soon perceived by the agents of Massachusetts that the old charter would not be restored, and that the King was determined to retain the appointment of the governor in his own hands. The colony, however, was authorised to exercise the powers of government according to the ancient system, until a new arrangement should be made. The vessel by which these directions were transmitted, carried also orders that sir Edmond Andros, and those imprisoned with him should be sent to England.

The revolution that put the Prince and Princess of Orange on the throne revived in Massachusetts the hope of getting back the old charter. Elections were held under the authority of the temporary government, and the representatives asked the council to use the powers granted to them by the charter until orders came from England. The council agreed to this request, and the old system was put back in place. It soon became clear to the agents of Massachusetts that the old charter wouldn’t be restored and that the King was set on keeping control over the governor's appointment. However, the colony was allowed to govern according to the old system until a new arrangement could be established. The ship that carried these instructions also brought orders to send Sir Edmond Andros and those imprisoned with him back to England.

The general court deputed additional agents, with instructions to solicit the confirmation of their beloved charter; but these solicitations were ineffectual. 1691New Charter.The King was inflexible; and, at length, a new charter was framed, introducing some changes which affected radically the independence that had been long practically possessed by the colony. The governor was to be appointed by the crown, was enabled to call, adjourn, prorogue, and dissolve the assembly at pleasure; he had the appointment solely, of all military officers; and, with the consent of his council, of all officers belonging to the courts of justice.

The general court appointed more agents to try to get their cherished charter confirmed, but these efforts were unsuccessful. 1691New Charter.The King was unyielding, and eventually, a new charter was created, making some changes that fundamentally affected the independence the colony had enjoyed for a long time. The governor would be appointed by the crown and could call, adjourn, prorogue, and dissolve the assembly whenever he wanted; he solely had the power to appoint all military officers and, with his council's approval, appoint all officers for the courts of justice.

1692

Sir William Phipps, the first governor, arrived in May, and immediately issued writs for a general assembly, which met in June, and accepted the charter; though a considerable party had been formed to oppose it. This instrument annexed Plymouth and Nova Scotia to Massachusetts; but, contrary to the wishes of both colonies, omitted New Hampshire, which became permanently a separate government.[115]

Sir William Phipps, the first governor, arrived in May and quickly issued notices for a general assembly, which convened in June and accepted the charter, even though a significant group had formed to oppose it. This document attached Plymouth and Nova Scotia to Massachusetts; however, against the wishes of both colonies, it left out New Hampshire, which became a separate government permanently.[115]

Affairs of New York.

In New York, Leisler, who had obtained the entire control of the lower country, associated with himself in the government, a few trusty partisans, denominated a committee of safety, over whom he presided. Some of the principal inhabitants of the city, dissatisfied at seeing a man of low birth, without education, in possession of supreme power, retired to Albany, where a convention of the people was assembled, who determined to hold the fort and country for the King and Queen, but not to submit to the authority of Leisler. On receiving intelligence of these transactions, Jacob Milbourne was detached with a small force to reduce the place; but, finding that the people adhered to the convention, and that his harangues against James and popery made no impression on them, he returned to New York. The next spring he appeared again before the fort; and, being favoured by an irruption of the Indians, obtained possession of it. The principal members of the convention absconded, upon which their effects were seized and confiscated. This harsh measure produced resentments which were transmitted from father to son.

In New York, Leisler, who had gained complete control of the lower country, surrounded himself with a few trusted supporters, forming a committee of safety that he led. Some of the city's prominent residents, unhappy with a man of low birth and no education holding supreme power, retreated to Albany. There, a convention of the people was gathered, deciding to defend the fort and the territory for the King and Queen, but refusing to accept Leisler's authority. When Jacob Milbourne learned of these events, he was sent with a small force to take the location. However, after realizing that the people were loyal to the convention and that his speeches against James and Catholicism had no effect on them, he returned to New York. The following spring, he returned to the fort; thanks to an invasion by the Indians, he was able to take it. The main members of the convention fled, leading to the seizure and confiscation of their belongings. This harsh action sparked resentment that would be passed down from generation to generation.

Leisler retained the supreme power, without farther opposition, until the arrival of sir Henry Slaughter, who had been appointed governor of the province. Though informed of the commission which Slaughter bore, this infatuated man refused to yield the government to him; and showed a disposition, without the ability, to resist. This ill judged obstinacy threw the governor, who soon obtained possession of the fort, into the arms of the opposite party. Leisler and Milbourne were arrested, tried for high treason, condemned, and executed. Their estates were confiscated, but were afterwards restored to their families.[116]

Leisler held onto power without further opposition until Sir Henry Slaughter arrived, having been appointed governor of the province. Even though he knew about the commission Slaughter had, this stubborn man refused to hand over the government to him and showed a willingness to resist, despite lacking the capability to do so. This ill-advised stubbornness led the governor, who quickly took control of the fort, to align with the opposing party. Leisler and Milbourne were arrested, tried for high treason, found guilty, and executed. Their estates were taken away but were later returned to their families.[116]

While these things were passing in the interior, the colonies of New England and New York were engaged in a bloody and desolating war with the French of Canada, and with the Indians. The English people had long viewed with apprehension, the advances of France towards universal dominion; and with infinite disgust, the influence of Louis XIV. in their cabinet. On the elevation of the Prince of Orange to the throne, they entered with alacrity into all his views for opposing barriers to the power, and restraints on the ambition, of that haughty monarch. War with France.The war which was proclaimed between the two nations, extended itself to their possessions in America. De Calliers, who sailed from Canada to France in 1688, had formed a plan for the conquest of New York, which was adopted by his government. Caffiniere commanded the ships which sailed from Rochefort on this expedition, subject however to the count de Frontignac, who was general of the land forces destined to march from Canada by the route of the river Sorel and of lake Champlain. The fleet and troops arrived at Chebucta, whence the count proceeded to Quebec leaving orders with Caffiniere to sail to New York.

While these events were unfolding in the interior, the colonies of New England and New York were caught up in a brutal and devastating war with the French in Canada and the Native Americans. The English had long been uneasy about France's ambitions for global dominance and were deeply frustrated by Louis XIV’s influence in their government. When the Prince of Orange ascended to the throne, they eagerly supported his plans to create obstacles to the power and ambitions of that arrogant king. War with France.The war declared between the two nations also spread to their territories in America. De Calliers, who sailed from Canada to France in 1688, had devised a plan to conquer New York, which his government approved. Caffiniere commanded the ships that set sail from Rochefort for this mission, but he was under the authority of Count de Frontignac, who was in charge of the land forces that were to march from Canada via the Sorel River and Lake Champlain. The fleet and troops arrived at Chebucta, where the Count headed to Quebec, leaving orders for Caffiniere to proceed to New York.

On reaching Quebec, the count found all Canada in the utmost distress. In the preceding summer, twelve hundred warriors of the Five nations had suddenly landed on the island of Montreal, and put to death about one thousand of the inhabitants whom they found in perfect security. The place was again attacked in October, and the lower part of the island entirely destroyed. In consequence of these calamitous events, fort Frontignac, on lake Ontario, was evacuated, and two vessels which had been constructed there were burnt.

On arriving in Quebec, the count discovered that all of Canada was in intense distress. The previous summer, twelve hundred warriors from the Five Nations had suddenly landed on the island of Montreal and killed around one thousand of the residents who felt completely safe. The area was attacked again in October, and the southern part of the island was completely destroyed. As a result of these disastrous events, Fort Frontignac on Lake Ontario was evacuated, and two ships that had been built there were set on fire.

Count Frontignac, who, in his sixty-eighth year, possessed the activity of youth, after remaining a few days on shore, re-embarked in a canoe for Montreal. In the hope of conciliating the Five nations, he held a great council with them at Onondago, where the Indians showed some disposition towards a peace without concluding one. To influence their deliberations, and raise the depressed spirits of the Canadians, he sent out several parties against the English colonies. That against New York, consisting of about two hundred French, and some Indians; after marching twenty-two days with their provisions on their backs, through a wilderness covered deep with snow, arrived, on 8th of February 1690, about eleven at night, at Schenectady, a village a few miles north-west of Albany. Schenectady destroyed.Finding the gates open and unguarded, they immediately entered the town, the inhabitants of which were asleep; and, dividing themselves into small parties, invested every house at the same time. No alarm was given until the doors were broken open; and then was commenced the perpetration of those barbarities which add so much to the ordinary horrors of war. The whole village was instantly in flames; pregnant women were ripped open and their infants cast into the flames, or dashed against the posts of the doors. Sixty persons were massacred, twenty-seven carried into captivity, and those who escaped fled naked, through a deep snow and storm to Albany. In the flight, twenty-five lost their limbs from the intensity of the cold. The town was pillaged until about noon the next day, when the enemy marched off with their plunder. Being pursued by a party of young men from Albany, about twenty-five of them were killed and captured.[117]

Count Frontignac, who, at sixty-eight years old, was as active as a young person, re-embarked in a canoe for Montreal after staying a few days on shore. Hoping to win over the Five Nations, he organized a large council with them at Onondaga, where the Indians showed some willingness for peace, though no agreement was reached. To sway their discussions and lift the spirits of the Canadians, he sent several groups against the English colonies. One group targeted New York, consisting of around two hundred French and some Indians; after marching for twenty-two days with their supplies on their backs through a wilderness covered in deep snow, they arrived on February 8, 1690, around eleven at night in Schenectady, a village a few miles northwest of Albany. Schenectady is destroyed. Finding the gates open and unguarded, they quickly entered the town where the inhabitants were asleep, dividing into small parties to surround every house at once. No alarm was raised until the doors were broken down, at which point the brutal acts began that add to the usual horrors of war. The entire village was soon set ablaze; pregnant women were cut open, and their infants were thrown into the fire or smashed against the doorframes. Sixty people were killed, twenty-seven were taken captive, and those who managed to escape fled naked through deep snow and a storm to Albany. In their flight, twenty-five lost limbs due to the severe cold. The town was looted until around noon the following day, when the attackers left with their spoils. A group of young men from Albany gave chase, resulting in about twenty-five of the attackers being killed or captured.[117]

In the spring and summer of 1689, several settlements and forts in New Hampshire and Maine, were successfully attacked by the Indians; who, wherever they were victorious, perpetrated their usual cruelties. Expedition against Port Royal.Knowing that these depredations originated in Canada and Acadié, the general court of Massachusetts planned an expedition against both Port Royal and Quebec. Early in the spring, eight small vessels, carrying seven or eight hundred men, sailed under the command of sir William Phipps; and, almost without opposition, took possession of Port Royal, and of the whole coast between that place and New England. The fleet returned in May, having taken nearly plunder enough to discharge the expense of the equipment. But two detachments made about the same time by count Frontignac, attacked the Salmon falls, and fort Casco, where they killed and took about one hundred and eighty persons.

In the spring and summer of 1689, several towns and forts in New Hampshire and Maine were successfully attacked by the Native Americans, who, wherever they won, committed their usual acts of violence. Expedition to Port Royal. Knowing that these attacks were coming from Canada and Acadié, the Massachusetts general court planned an expedition against both Port Royal and Quebec. Early in the spring, eight small ships carrying seven or eight hundred men set sail under the command of Sir William Phipps; and, almost without resistance, took control of Port Royal and the entire coast between that location and New England. The fleet returned in May, having gathered nearly enough loot to cover the costs of the expedition. However, two detachments sent out at the same time by Count Frontignac attacked Salmon Falls and Fort Casco, where they killed and captured about one hundred eighty people.

 

Penn

Penn

Penn Seeking Freedom for Imprisoned Friends

Penn Seeking Freedom for Imprisoned Friends

© by Violet Oakley; From a Copley print copyright by Curtis and Cameron, Boston

© by Violet Oakley; From a Copley print copyright by Curtis and Cameron, Boston

The reference made in the panel inscription at the top of this picture is to William Penn's imprisonment in the Tower of London for publishing "The Sandy Foundation Shaken," in which he attacked the doctrines of the Trinity. While in prison he wrote his most famous and popular book, "No Cross, No Crown" and "Innocency With Her Open Face", in vindication of his Quaker faith. In 1681 Penn obtained from the British Crown, in lieu of a debt of £16,000 due him as heir to his father, Admiral Penn, a grant of territory now comprising the State of Pennsylvania. There he founded Philadelphia, as a Quaker colony, in the following year.

The reference in the panel inscription at the top of this picture is about William Penn's imprisonment in the Tower of London for publishing "The Sandy Foundation Shaken," where he criticized the doctrines of the Trinity. While in prison, he wrote his most famous and popular book, "No Cross, No Crown" and "Innocency With Her Open Face," defending his Quaker beliefs. In 1681, Penn received from the British Crown, in payment for a debt of £16,000 owed to him as the heir of his father, Admiral Penn, a land grant that now makes up the State of Pennsylvania. The following year, he established Philadelphia as a Quaker colony.

 

A vessel had been dispatched to England in April with letters urging the importance of conquering Canada, and soliciting the aid of the King to that enterprise. He was however too much occupied in Europe to attend to America; and it was determined to prosecute the expedition without his assistance. Against Quebec.New York and Connecticut, engaged to furnish a body of men, to march, by the way of lake Champlain, against Montreal, while the troops of Massachusetts should proceed by sea to Quebec. The fleet, consisting of between thirty and forty vessels, the largest of which carried forty-four guns, sailed from Nantucket the ninth of August, having on board two thousand men. This expedition also was commanded by sir William Phipps, a brave man, but not qualified for so difficult an enterprise. He did not arrive before Quebec until October, when it was too late for a regular siege. Instead of availing himself of the first impression, sir William is charged with having wasted two or three days in sight of the place, after which he summoned it to surrender. Having performed this ceremony, he landed between twelve and thirteen hundred men, and marched until night, under a scattering fire from an enemy concealed in the woods. At night, a deserter gave such an account of the French force as entirely discouraged him.

A ship had been sent to England in April with letters highlighting the need to conquer Canada and asking for the King's support for this mission. However, he was too busy with matters in Europe to focus on America, so they decided to continue with the expedition without his help. Against Quebec. New York and Connecticut agreed to provide a group of men to travel via Lake Champlain to attack Montreal, while the troops from Massachusetts would go by sea to Quebec. The fleet, made up of about thirty to forty ships, the largest of which had forty-four guns, set sail from Nantucket on August 9, carrying two thousand men. This mission was also led by Sir William Phipps, a courageous man but not suited for such a challenging task. He didn’t reach Quebec until October, by which time it was too late for a proper siege. Instead of taking advantage of the initial surprise, Sir William is said to have wasted two or three days right in front of the place before he called for its surrender. After doing this, he landed around twelve to thirteen hundred men and marched until nightfall, under sporadic fire from enemies hidden in the woods. That night, a deserter provided such an account of the French forces that it completely discouraged him.

Connecticut and New York were disappointed in receiving the assistance expected from the Five nations; who furnished neither the warriors they had promised, nor canoes to transport their troops over the lakes. The commissary too had neglected to lay up the necessary supplies of provisions. These disappointments obliged the party destined against Montreal to retreat without making an attempt on that place; which enabled the French general to oppose the whole force of Canada to Phipps.

Connecticut and New York were let down by the help they expected from the Five Nations, who provided neither the warriors they had promised nor canoes to move their troops across the lakes. The commissary also failed to stock the essential food supplies. Because of these setbacks, the group set to attack Montreal had to pull back without trying to take the city, allowing the French general to concentrate all of Canada’s forces against Phipps.

The evening after the troops were landed, the ships were drawn up before the place, but received more damage from the batteries than they could do to the town. After wasting a few days in unavailing parade, the army re-embarked with precipitation, and returned to Boston.

The night after the troops landed, the ships were lined up in front of the place but took more damage from the cannons than they inflicted on the town. After spending a few days in pointless display, the army hurriedly got back on the ships and returned to Boston.

The general court, so far from suspecting that the expedition might possibly miscarry, seem to have counted, not only on success, but on acquiring sufficient treasure from the enemy to pay their soldiers. The army, finding the government totally unprepared to satisfy its claims, was on the point of mutinying. In this state of difficulty, bills of credit were issued, and were received in lieu of money. A tax was imposed at the same time, payable in the paper notes of the colony at five per centum above par. Notwithstanding the exertions to keep up its credit, the paper depreciated to fourteen shillings in the pound, which depreciation was, almost entirely, sustained by the army. As the time for collecting the tax approached, the paper rose above par, but this appreciation was gained by the holders.[118]

The general court, far from thinking that the expedition might fail, seemed to expect not only success but also to gain enough treasure from the enemy to pay their soldiers. The army, finding the government completely unprepared to meet its demands, was on the verge of mutiny. In this challenging situation, bills of credit were issued and accepted instead of cash. At the same time, a tax was imposed, payable in the colony's paper notes at five percent above par. Despite efforts to maintain its value, the paper currency depreciated to fourteen shillings per pound, with the army bearing the brunt of this loss. As the deadline for collecting the tax drew near, the paper rose above par, but this increase in value benefited the holders.[118]

Colonel Phipps, soon after his return from Canada, embarked for England, to renew the solicitations of the colony for aid in another attempt on Quebec. Though unsuccessful in this application, the government of the province was bestowed on him; and, in this character, he returned to Boston. A desultory war continued to be carried on, which, without furnishing any events that would now be interesting, produced heavy expense, and much individual misery.

Colonel Phipps, shortly after getting back from Canada, set off for England to push for support from the colony for another attempt on Quebec. Although he didn't succeed in this request, he was appointed as the governor of the province; in this role, he returned to Boston. A scattered war continued to unfold, which, while lacking any events that would be intriguing today, resulted in significant costs and a lot of personal suffering.

1693

Canada being considered as the source of all these evils, its conquest continued to be the favourite object of Massachusetts. At length, King William yielded to the solicitations of that colony and determined to employ a force for the reduction of Quebec. Unfortunately the first part of the plan was to be executed in the West Indies, where the capture of Martinique was contemplated. While on that service a contagious fever attacked both the land and sea forces; and, before they reached Boston, thirteen hundred sailors, and eighteen hundred soldiers, were buried. The survivors not being in a condition to prosecute the enterprise, it was abandoned.[119]

Canada was seen as the source of all these problems, so conquering it remained a top priority for Massachusetts. Eventually, King William agreed to the requests from that colony and decided to send a force to capture Quebec. Unfortunately, the first part of the plan had to be carried out in the West Indies, where they aimed to take Martinique. While on this mission, both the land and naval forces were hit by a contagious fever, and by the time they returned to Boston, thirteen hundred sailors and eighteen hundred soldiers had died. The remaining troops were not fit to continue the operation, so it was called off.[119]

On the conquest of Acadié by sir William Phipps, the government of Massachusetts had been extended over that province; but, as the prejudices and affections of the inhabitants were entirely on the side of France, it was soon perceived that a military force alone could preserve the acquisition; and Massachusetts was unable, at her own expense, to support a sufficient body of troops for the defence of the country. 1696Port Royal was recovered by Villebonne, after which all Acadié shook off the government of Massachusetts, and resumed its allegiance to France. About the same time a fort at Pemaquid was attacked and carried by Iberville.

On the conquest of Acadié by Sir William Phipps, the Massachusetts government extended its control over that region; however, since the local people were loyal to France, it quickly became clear that only a military presence could maintain that control. Massachusetts could not afford to deploy enough troops to defend the area. 1696 Port Royal was recaptured by Villebonne, after which all of Acadié rejected Massachusetts' government and returned to France. Around the same time, a fort at Pemaquid was attacked and taken by Iberville.

Peace.

In December, the treaty of peace which had been concluded at Riswick was proclaimed at Boston; and hostilities with the French in Canada immediately ceased. The depredations of the Indians continued only a short time after this event; and, in the course of the following year, general tranquillity was restored.

In December, the peace treaty that had been finalized at Riswick was announced in Boston, and fighting with the French in Canada immediately stopped. The raids by the Indians lasted only a short time after this, and by the following year, peace was fully restored.

1697

The frontiers of New Hampshire had been not less exposed during the war, than those of Massachusetts. Perpetual and distressing incursions had been made into the country, which were marked by the burning of undefended habitations, and the massacre of men, women, and children.[120]

The borders of New Hampshire faced just as much danger during the war as those of Massachusetts. Constant and devastating attacks occurred in the region, resulting in the destruction of unprotected homes and the brutal killing of men, women, and children.[120]

Affairs of New York.

The frontiers of New York were covered by the Five nations. Hostilities were carried on between them and the French, but they were not attended by any material circumstance.

The borders of New York were held by the Five Nations. Conflicts occurred between them and the French, but they didn’t involve any significant events.

During the war the English government meditated a union of the colonies for the purpose of forming an army to defend New York; and the governors were instructed to propose to the several provinces to raise the quota of troops assigned to each[121] by the crown. Though this plan never took effect, the fact is of some interest.

During the war, the English government considered uniting the colonies to create an army to defend New York, and the governors were instructed to suggest that the various provinces raise the number of troops allocated to each by the crown. Although this plan never came to fruition, it is still of some interest.

The influence of the French not yet extending far enough south to involve the colonies beyond New York in the calamities of Indian warfare, few occurrences took place among them which deserve attention. Of Virginia.In Virginia, the college of William and Mary, to which a charter had been granted in 1692, was liberally endowed, and was established at Williamsburg by an act of assembly which passed in the year 1693. In 1698, the state-house at Jamestown, with many valuable papers, was consumed by fire; and, in the following year, the legislature passed an act for removing the seat of government to Williamsburg, then called the middle plantation, and for building a capitol at that place.

The influence of the French hadn't yet spread far enough south to pull the colonies beyond New York into the tragedies of Indian warfare, so there weren't many significant events among them that warranted attention. Of Virginia. In Virginia, the College of William and Mary, which received a charter in 1692, was well-funded and established in Williamsburg by an act of assembly passed in 1693. In 1698, the state house in Jamestown, along with many important documents, was destroyed by fire; and the following year, the legislature passed a law to move the seat of government to Williamsburg, then known as the Middle Plantation, and to build a capitol there.

By the treaty of Riswick, it was agreed that France and England should mutually restore to each other all conquests made during the war; and it was farther stipulated that commissioners should be appointed to examine and determine the rights and pretensions of each monarch to the places situated in Hudson's bay.

By the Treaty of Riswick, France and England agreed to return all conquests they made during the war to each other; it was also decided that commissioners would be appointed to review and settle the claims of each monarch regarding the territories located in Hudson's Bay.

The consequences of not ascertaining boundaries were soon perceived. The English claimed as far west as the St. Croix, while France asserted her right to the whole country east of the Kennebeck.

The consequences of not determining boundaries were soon recognized. The English claimed territory as far west as the St. Croix, while France asserted its right to the entire area east of the Kennebeck.

War renewed.

These claims remained unsettled; and were mingled with other differences of more importance, which soon occasioned the re-commencement of hostilities.

These claims were still unresolved and were mixed with other more significant disagreements, which quickly led to the start of hostilities again.

1702

The whole weight of the war in America fell on New England. Previous to its commencement, the earl of Bellamont, who was at that time governor of New York as well as of Massachusetts and of New Hampshire, had required that the quotas of men, assigned by the crown to the different colonies for the defence of New York, should be furnished. This requisition however was not complied with; and, before hostilities began, a treaty of neutrality was negotiated between the Five nations and the governor of Canada, which was assented to by lord Cornbury, then governor of New York. This treaty preserved the peace of that province, but left Massachusetts and New Hampshire to struggle with the combined force of the French and their Indian allies;—a struggle which seems to have been viewed by New York with the utmost composure.

The entire burden of the war in America fell on New England. Before it began, the Earl of Bellamont, who was the governor of New York, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire at that time, requested that the quotas of men assigned by the crown to different colonies for the defense of New York be provided. However, this request was not fulfilled; and, before hostilities started, a neutrality agreement was made between the Five Nations and the governor of Canada, which was approved by Lord Cornbury, the then-governor of New York. This treaty maintained peace in that province but forced Massachusetts and New Hampshire to face the combined forces of the French and their Indian allies—a fight that New York seemed to watch with complete indifference.

Hostilities between Great Britain and France were immediately followed by incursions of French and Indians into the exposed parts of New England. A predatory and desolating war, attended with no striking circumstance, but with considerable expense and great individual distress, was carried on for some years. During its continuance, propositions were made for a cessation of hostilities; and the negotiations on this subject were protracted to a considerable length; but Dudley, who had succeeded the earl of Bellamont as governor of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, declined engaging for the neutrality of those provinces, in the hope that Nova Scotia and Canada might be subdued in the course of the war.

Hostilities between Great Britain and France were quickly followed by incursions of French and Native Americans into the vulnerable areas of New England. It was a destructive and devastating war, marked by no significant events but with high costs and great individual suffering, lasting for several years. During this time, there were calls for a stop to the fighting; negotiations on this issue dragged on for quite a while, but Dudley, who took over as governor of Massachusetts and New Hampshire after the earl of Bellamont, refused to commit to neutrality for those regions, hoping that Nova Scotia and Canada could be conquered during the war.

1707

The battle of Almanza, in Spain, having induced the British cabinet to direct an armament intended for New England to European objects, Dudley determined to make an attempt on Acadié, though no aid should arrive from England. With this view, he applied, early in the spring, to the assemblies of both his provinces, and to the colonies of Connecticut and Rhode Island; requesting them to raise one thousand men for the expedition. Connecticut declined furnishing her quota; but the other three colonies raised the whole number, who were disposed into two regiments, one commanded by colonel Wainright, and the other by colonel Hilton. On the 13th of May, they embarked at Nantucket on board a fleet of transports furnished with whale boats, under convoy of a man of war and a galley. The chief command was given to colonel March, who had behaved gallantly in several encounters with the Indians, but had never been engaged in such service as this. They arrived before Port Royal in a few days, and landed without opposition. After making some ineffectual attempts to bombard the fort, a disagreement among the officers, and a misapprehension of the state of the fort and garrison, induced the troops to re-embark in a disorderly manner.[122] Dudley, who was unwilling to relinquish the enterprise, directed the army to remain in its position till farther orders. March was beloved by the soldiers, and was known to be brave, but his capacity was doubted. It was therefore thought unsafe either to recall him, to place an officer over him, or to continue him in the chief command. The expedient devised in this perplexity was, to send a commission to the army, composed of three members of the council, invested with all the powers which the governor himself, if present, would possess. These commissioners arrived at Casco about the middle of July, where they found the army insubordinate, and indisposed to the service. The troops, however, were again embarked, and arrived at Passamaquodi, on the seventh of August. The spirits of the general were broken, and his health was impaired. While dispositions for landing the army were making, he declared his inability to act, and the command devolved on colonel Wainright. The landing was effected on the 10th of August; but the troops could not be inspired with that union and firmness which are essential to success. After devoting ten days to inefficient, unmeaning operations, they re-embarked, and returned, sickly, fatigued and dispirited.

The battle of Almanza in Spain led the British government to shift its focus from sending forces to New England to European matters. Dudley decided to try for Acadia, even without support from England. Early in the spring, he reached out to the assemblies of his provinces and the colonies of Connecticut and Rhode Island, asking them to raise one thousand men for the mission. Connecticut refused to provide its share, but the other three colonies managed to gather the full number, organizing them into two regiments, one led by Colonel Wainright and the other by Colonel Hilton. On May 13th, they set sail from Nantucket on a fleet of transport ships equipped with whale boats, protected by a warship and a galley. Colonel March, who had shown courage in several battles with the Indians but had never been involved in an operation like this, was given overall command. They reached Port Royal in a few days and landed without any resistance. After some unsuccessful attempts to bombard the fort and facing disagreements among the officers, along with misunderstandings about the condition of the fort and its garrison, the troops ended up re-embarking in a chaotic manner. Dudley, not wanting to give up on the mission, ordered the army to stay put until further instructions. March was well-liked by the soldiers and recognized for his bravery, but there were doubts about his leadership skills. It was considered unsafe to either recall him, appoint someone over him, or keep him in charge. The solution was to send a commission to the army made up of three council members, who would have the same authority as the governor would if he were present. These commissioners arrived at Casco around mid-July and found the army disobedient and unwilling to serve. However, the troops were eventually re-embarked and reached Passamaquoddy on August 7th. The general's spirits were low, and his health was deteriorating. While preparations for landing the army were being made, he announced he could no longer lead, and command passed to Colonel Wainright. The landing took place on August 10th, but the troops lacked the unity and determination needed for success. After ten days of ineffective and pointless actions, they re-embarked and returned, feeling sick, exhausted, and demoralized.

1708

During this unfortunate expedition, the frontiers were kept in perpetual alarm by small parties of Indians; and, in the succeeding year, a formidable armament was destined by Vaudreuil, the governor of Canada, against New England. This enterprise was not fully prosecuted, in consequence of the failure of several Indian tribes to furnish the number of warriors expected from them. Incursion into Massachusetts.A considerable force, however, penetrated into Massachusetts, and burnt a part of the town of Haverhill; where about one hundred persons were killed and many others carried off as prisoners. These invaders were pursued and overtaken by a body of troops collected in the neighbourhood, who killed a few of them, and recovered several of their own countrymen.

During this unfortunate expedition, the frontiers were constantly on edge due to small groups of Native Americans; and, in the following year, Vaudreuil, the governor of Canada, planned a significant attack on New England. This mission was not fully carried out because several Indian tribes failed to provide the expected number of warriors. Invasion of Massachusetts. However, a considerable force managed to push into Massachusetts and burned part of the town of Haverhill, resulting in about one hundred people being killed and many others taken as prisoners. These invaders were pursued and caught by a group of soldiers from the area, who killed a few of them and rescued several of their fellow countrymen.

The New England colonies, still attributing all these calamities to the French were earnest in their solicitations to the crown, for aids which might enable them to conquer Canada. Their application was supported by the representations of Francis Nicholson, who had been lieutenant governor, first of New York, and afterward of Virginia; of Samuel Vietch, a trader to Nova Scotia, and of colonel Schuyler, a gentleman of great influence in New York, who undertook a voyage to England for the purpose of communicating his sentiments more fully to administration, and carried with him resolutions of the assembly, expressing the high opinion that body entertained of his merit. Influenced by these representations, the British cabinet determined to undertake an expedition against the French settlements on the continent of North America, and on New Foundland, to consist of a squadron, having on board five regiments of regular troops, 1709which were to be at Boston by the middle of May, 1709, where they were to be joined by twelve hundred men to be raised in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. Fifteen hundred men also were to be raised in the governments south of Rhode Island, who should proceed, by the way of lake Champlain, against Montreal. All the colonies, except Pennsylvania, executed with punctuality the part assigned to them. Nicholson, who was appointed to command the troops destined against Montreal, marched to Wood creek, where he was ordered to continue, until the arrival of the forces from Europe; that the two armies might co-operate with each other. The New England troops, who had been assembled at Boston remained at that place till September, expecting the arrival of the fleet and army from England. About that time, Nicholson returned from Wood creek, and it was obviously too late to proceed against Quebec. A meeting of the commanding officers, and governors of provinces was requested, in order to deliberate on future operations. A few days before this meeting was to take place, a ship arrived from England, with the intelligence that the armament intended for America had been ordered to Portugal, and with directions to hold a council of war, in order to determine on the propriety of employing the troops raised in America, against Port Royal; in which event the ships of war then at Boston were to aid the expedition. The commanders of the ships, except captain, afterwards admiral, Matthews, refused to engage in this service; and, it being unsafe to proceed without convoy, the men were disbanded.[123]

The New England colonies, still blaming all these disasters on the French, were persistent in their requests to the crown for support that would let them conquer Canada. Their plea was backed by Francis Nicholson, who had served as lieutenant governor of New York and later of Virginia; Samuel Vietch, a trader to Nova Scotia; and Colonel Schuyler, a prominent figure in New York, who traveled to England to share his thoughts more thoroughly with the administration and took with him resolutions from the assembly that highlighted their high regard for his abilities. Influenced by these arguments, the British government decided to launch an expedition against the French settlements in North America and Newfoundland, consisting of a squadron carrying five regiments of regular troops, 1709 which were to arrive in Boston by mid-May 1709, where they would be joined by twelve hundred men recruited in Massachusetts and Rhode Island. An additional fifteen hundred men would be raised in the colonies south of Rhode Island, planning to go via Lake Champlain towards Montreal. All the colonies, except Pennsylvania, fulfilled their assigned roles diligently. Nicholson, designated to lead the troops headed for Montreal, marched to Wood Creek, where he was instructed to stay until the forces from Europe arrived so that both armies could work together. The New England troops gathered in Boston remained there until September, waiting for the fleet and army from England. Around that time, Nicholson returned from Wood Creek, and it was clearly too late to move against Quebec. A meeting was requested involving the commanding officers and governors of the provinces to discuss future actions. Just days before this meeting was scheduled, a ship arrived from England with news that the forces intended for America were redirected to Portugal and instructions to hold a war council to decide whether the American-raised troops should be sent against Port Royal. In this case, the warships currently in Boston would support the mission. The ship commanders, except for Captain Matthews, who later became an admiral, refused to take part in this operation, and since it was too risky to proceed without escort, the troops were disbanded.[123]

A congress, composed of governors, and of delegates from several of the assemblies, met at Rhode Island, and recommended the appointment of agents to assist colonel Nicholson in representing the state of the country to the Queen, and soliciting troops for an expedition against Canada, the next spring. Government seems at first to have thought favourably of this proposal, but finally determined to proceed only against Port Royal. 1710Five frigates and a bomb ketch, which were assigned for this service, arrived with Nicholson, in July. Although the troops were then to be raised, the whole armament, consisting of one regiment of marines, and four regiments of infantry, sailed from Boston the 18th of September; and on the 24th arrived before Port Royal. The place was immediately invested, and, after the exchange of a few shot and shells, was surrendered. Vietch was appointed governor, and its name, in compliment to the Queen, was changed to Annapolis.

A congress made up of governors and delegates from various assemblies met in Rhode Island and recommended appointing agents to help Colonel Nicholson represent the state of affairs to the Queen and request troops for an expedition against Canada the following spring. The government initially seemed to support this proposal but ultimately decided to focus only on Port Royal. 1710 Five frigates and a bomb ketch assigned for this mission arrived with Nicholson in July. Even though troops were supposed to be raised then, the entire force, which included one regiment of marines and four regiments of infantry, set sail from Boston on September 18 and arrived in front of Port Royal on the 24th. The location was quickly surrounded, and after a brief exchange of cannon fire and shells, it surrendered. Vietch was appointed governor, and the place was renamed Annapolis in honor of the Queen.

After the reduction of Port Royal, Nicholson returned to England to renew the often repeated solicitations for an expedition against Canada. The ministry was now changed; and the colonists despaired of obtaining from those in power, any aids against the French. Contrary to the general expectation, his application succeeded; 1711and he arrived at Boston, in June, with orders to the governors as far south as Pennsylvania, to get their quotas of men and provisions in readiness to act with the fleet and army expected from Europe. Within sixteen days, while the several governors were yet deliberating on the subject of these orders, the fleet arrived. The service according perfectly with the wishes of the people as well as of the governors, every practicable exertion was made; and difficulties were overcome which, on other occasions, might have been deemed insurmountable. To supply the money which the English treasury could not then advance, the general court of Massachusetts issued bills of credit to the amount of forty thousand pounds; and the example was followed by Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey. Provisions were obtained by impressment.

After the fall of Port Royal, Nicholson went back to England to renew the frequently made requests for an expedition against Canada. The government had changed, and the colonists had lost hope of getting any support from those in power against the French. Contrary to what everyone expected, his application was successful; 1711 and he arrived in Boston in June with orders for the governors all the way down to Pennsylvania to prepare their quotas of men and supplies to join the fleet and army coming from Europe. Within sixteen days, while the various governors were still discussing these orders, the fleet arrived. Since the mission aligned perfectly with the wishes of both the people and the governors, every possible effort was made, overcoming challenges that might have seemed impossible in other situations. To cover the funds that the English treasury couldn't provide at that time, the general court of Massachusetts issued bills of credit totaling forty thousand pounds; Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey followed suit. Supplies were obtained through impressment.

The army consisted of seven veteran regiments, who had served under the duke of Marlborough; one regiment of marines; and two regiments of provincials; amounting, in the whole, to six thousand five hundred men; a force equal to that which afterwards reduced Quebec, when in a much better state of defence. This armament sailed from Boston on the 30th of July. Their sanguine hopes were all blasted in one fatal night. On the 23d of August, in the river St. Lawrence, the weather being thick and dark, eight transports were wrecked on Egg Island, near the north shore, and one thousand persons perished. The next day the fleet put back, and was eight days beating down the river against an easterly wind, which, in two, would have carried it to Quebec. After holding a fruitless consultation respecting an attempt on Placentia, the expedition was abandoned; and the squadron sailed for England. Loud complaints were made, and heavy charges reciprocated, on this occasion. The ignorance of the pilots, the obstinacy of the admiral, the detention of the fleet at Boston, its late arrival there, the want of seasonable orders, and the secret intentions of the ministry, were all subjects of bitter altercation; but no regular inquiry was ever made into the causes of the miscarriage.

The army was made up of seven seasoned regiments that had served under the Duke of Marlborough, one regiment of marines, and two regiments of provincials, totaling six thousand five hundred men. This force was comparable to the one that later took Quebec, which was in a much better defensive position. The armada left Boston on July 30. Their optimistic hopes were shattered in one disastrous night. On August 23, in the St. Lawrence River, with thick and dark weather, eight transport ships were wrecked on Egg Island, near the north shore, resulting in the loss of one thousand lives. The next day, the fleet turned back and spent eight days struggling downriver against an easterly wind, which could have taken them to Quebec in two days. After a pointless discussion about making an attempt on Placentia, the mission was abandoned, and the squadron set sail for England. There were loud complaints and heavy blame thrown around on this occasion. Issues included the pilots' ignorance, the admiral's stubbornness, the fleet's delays in Boston, its late arrival, the lack of timely orders, and the secret intentions of the government. However, no formal investigation was ever conducted into the reasons for the failure.

The plan of this campaign embraced also an attack on Montreal. Four thousand men raised in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey, and commanded by colonel Nicholson, marched against that place by the way of Albany and lake Champlain. The failure of the expedition against Quebec enabling the governor of Canada to turn his whole force towards the lakes, Nicholson was under the necessity of making a precipitate retreat.

The plan for this campaign also included an attack on Montreal. Four thousand men raised in Connecticut, New York, and New Jersey, led by Colonel Nicholson, marched towards that location via Albany and Lake Champlain. The failure of the expedition against Quebec allowed the governor of Canada to focus all his forces on the lakes, forcing Nicholson to make a hasty retreat.

Peace.

No other event of importance took place during this war, which was terminated by the treaty of Utrecht. By the 12th article of this treaty, France ceded to England "all Nova Scotia or Acadié, with its ancient boundaries, as also the city of Port Royal, now called Annapolis Royal, and all other things in those parts which depend on the said lands." This territory, which had been comprehended in the grant made to the Plymouth company, was, with the consent of that company, afterwards granted by James as King of Scotland, under the name of Nova Scotia, to sir William Alexander.

No other significant events occurred during this war, which ended with the Treaty of Utrecht. According to the 12th article of this treaty, France handed over to England "all of Nova Scotia or Acadié, with its original boundaries, as well as the city of Port Royal, now known as Annapolis Royal, and everything else in that area that is part of the said lands." This territory, which was included in the grant to the Plymouth Company, was later granted by James, as King of Scotland, to Sir William Alexander with the company's consent, under the name of Nova Scotia.

Affairs of New York.

In New York, the Leislerian and anti-Leislerian parties continued to persecute each other. To this calamity was added, in the year 1702, the still heavier affliction of a malignant fever, imported in a vessel from the West Indies, which, in almost every instance, proved mortal. A similar disease raged, about the same time, in several other sea port towns; and was probably the same which has since produced such fatal effects under the name of the yellow fever.

In New York, the Leislerian and anti-Leislerian groups kept attacking each other. To this disaster was added, in 1702, the even worse blow of a deadly fever brought over by a ship from the West Indies, which proved fatal in nearly every case. A similar illness was spreading around that time in several other port towns and was likely the same disease that later caused such deadly outbreaks known as yellow fever.

In the same year, lord Cornbury, a needy and profligate nobleman, was appointed governor of the province. He embraced the anti-Leislerian party, that being then the strongest. On meeting the assembly, he urged the necessity of providing money for the public exigencies; and, as he had arranged himself with the ruling party, the vote of supply was liberal.

In the same year, Lord Cornbury, a desperate and reckless nobleman, was appointed governor of the province. He joined the anti-Leislerian party, which was the strongest at the time. When he met with the assembly, he emphasized the need to raise funds for public needs; since he had aligned himself with the ruling party, the funding vote was generous.

It was soon perceived that the confidence in the governor was misplaced. Considerable sums levied for objects of great interest, were applied to his private use. The system adopted in New York, for collecting and keeping public money, was calculated to favour this peculation. The colony having no treasurer, its revenue came into the hands of the receiver general for the crown, whence it was drawn by a warrant from the governor. Contests soon arose, between his lordship and the legislature, on the subject of money; the house requiring a statement of disbursements, and the appointment of a treasurer, to be controlled by them. At length, in 1706, an act was passed raising three thousand pounds for fortifications, and directing the money to be placed in the hands of a person named by the legislature. The assent of the governor to this act was not given till the succeeding year, and was then accompanied with a message stating, that he had it in command from the Queen "to permit the general assembly to name their own treasurer when they raised extraordinary supplies for particular uses and which are no part of the standing and constant revenue."

It soon became clear that the trust in the governor was misplaced. Large amounts collected for important projects were used for his personal benefit. The system used in New York for collecting and managing public funds was designed to enable this misuse. Since the colony had no treasurer, its revenue was handled by the receiver general for the crown, from which the governor would withdraw funds via a warrant. Conflicts quickly arose between the governor and the legislature over financial matters; the legislature demanded an account of expenditures and the appointment of a treasurer who would be accountable to them. Finally, in 1706, a law was passed to raise three thousand pounds for fortifications, stating that the funds should be managed by someone chosen by the legislature. The governor did not approve this law until the following year, and even then, he included a message indicating that he had been instructed by the Queen "to allow the general assembly to choose their own treasurer when they raised extraordinary funds for specific purposes that are not part of the regular, ongoing revenue."

The continual demands of the governor for money, his misapplication of it, his extortion in the form of fees, and his haughty tyrannical conduct increased the irritation subsisting between him and the legislature. At length, the Queen yielded to the complaints of both New York and New Jersey, and consented to recall him.

The constant demands for money from the governor, his inappropriate use of funds, his extortion through fees, and his arrogant, tyrannical behavior fueled the growing tension between him and the legislature. Finally, the Queen listened to the complaints from both New York and New Jersey and agreed to remove him from his position.

During these altercations, some spirited resolutions were entered into by the assembly; one of which claims particular notice. It is in these words: "Resolved, that the imposing and levying of any monies upon her majesty's subjects in this colony, under any pretence or colour whatsoever, without their consent in general assembly, is a grievance, and violation of the people's property."

During these disputes, the assembly made some passionate resolutions, one of which stands out. It states: "Resolved, that collecting any money from her majesty's subjects in this colony, under any pretext or guise, without their consent in a general assembly, is a grievance and a violation of the people's property."

This strong assertion of a principle, which afterwards dismembered the British empire, then passed away without notice. It was probably understood to be directed only against the assumption of that power by the governor.[124]

This strong statement of a principle, which later broke apart the British Empire, went unnoticed. It was likely seen as aimed only at the governor's claim to that power.[124]

In Carolina, the vexatious contests with the proprietors still continued. The public attention was for a time diverted from these, by hostilities with their neighbours of Florida. 1702Before the declaration of war made against France and Spain, had been officially communicated, it was reported in the colonies that this event had taken place, and Mr. Moore, the governor of the southern settlements, proposed to the assembly an expedition against St. Augustine. Temperate men were opposed to this enterprise; but the assurances of the governor, that Florida would be an easy conquest, and that immense treasure would be the reward of their valour, were too seductive to be resisted. A great majority of the assembly declared in favour of the expedition, and voted the sum of two thousand pounds sterling for its prosecution. Six hundred militia were embodied for the service, and an equal number of Indians engaged as auxiliaries.

In Carolina, the frustrating conflicts with the proprietors continued. For a while, the public's attention was drawn away from these issues by hostilities with their neighbors in Florida. 1702 Before the official declaration of war against France and Spain was announced, it was reported in the colonies that this had already happened, and Mr. Moore, the governor of the southern settlements, proposed an expedition against St. Augustine to the assembly. Moderate voices opposed this venture; however, the governor's assurances that Florida would be an easy target and that they would reap vast treasures as a reward for their bravery were too tempting to ignore. A large majority of the assembly supported the expedition and approved a budget of two thousand pounds sterling for its execution. Six hundred militia were organized for the mission, and an equal number of Indians were recruited as allies.

Expedition against St. Augustine.

In the plan of operations which had been concerted, colonel Daniel was to move by the inland passage, with a party of militia and Indians, and attack the town by land; while the governor, with the main body should proceed by sea, and block up the harbour. Colonel Daniel executed his part of the plan with promptitude and vigour. He advanced against the town, which he entered and plundered before the governor reached the harbour. The Spaniards, however, had been apprised of the preparations making at Charleston, and had laid up provisions for four months, in the castle, into which they retired, as Daniel entered the town. On the arrival of the governor, the place was completely invested; but, it being impossible to carry the castle without battering artillery, colonel Daniel was dispatched to Jamaica for cannon, bombs, and mortars. During his absence, two small Spanish vessels of war were seen off the mouth of the harbour; upon which the governor raised the siege, abandoned his transports, and made a precipitate retreat to Carolina. Colonel Daniel returned soon afterwards, and, having no suspicion that the siege was raised, stood in for the harbour. He fortunately discovered his situation in time to escape, though with much difficulty.

In the operational plan that was agreed upon, Colonel Daniel was to take the inland route with a group of militia and Native Americans to attack the town from land, while the governor and the main force would approach by sea to block the harbor. Colonel Daniel carried out his part of the plan quickly and energetically. He moved against the town, entering and plundering it before the governor arrived at the harbor. However, the Spaniards had learned about the preparations being made in Charleston and had stockpiled four months' worth of provisions in the castle, retreating there just as Daniel entered the town. By the time the governor arrived, the location was fully surrounded, but since it was impossible to take the castle without heavy artillery, Colonel Daniel was sent to Jamaica for cannons, bombs, and mortars. During his absence, two small Spanish warships were spotted off the harbor entrance, prompting the governor to lift the siege, abandon his transports, and make a hasty retreat back to Carolina. Colonel Daniel returned shortly after and, unaware that the siege was over, headed toward the harbor. He luckily realized his situation in time to escape, though it was quite difficult.

This rash and ill conducted expedition entailed on the colony a debt of six thousand pounds sterling. The ignominy attached to it was soon wiped off by one that was attended with better success. The Appalachian Indians, who were attached to the Spaniards, had become extremely troublesome to the inhabitants of the frontiers. The governor, at the head of a body of militia and friendly Indians, marched into the heart of their settlements, laid their towns in ashes, made several prisoners, and compelled them to sue for peace, and submit to the British government.[125]

This reckless and poorly planned expedition left the colony with a debt of six thousand pounds sterling. The shame from it was quickly overshadowed by a later expedition that had much better results. The Appalachian Indians, who were loyal to the Spaniards, had become a real problem for the settlers on the frontiers. The governor led a group of militia and allied Indians into the heart of their territories, burned their towns to the ground, captured several prisoners, and forced them to seek peace and submit to British rule.[125]

Governor Johnson.

Soon after this transaction, sir Nathaniel Governor Johnson, who had been appointed to succeed Mr. Moor arrived in Charleston. He endeavoured, but ineffectually to turn the attention of the colonists to the culture of silk. This article, as well as cotton was neglected, and rice became the great staple of the country.

Soon after this deal, Sir Nathaniel Governor Johnson, who had been appointed to take over from Mr. Moor, arrived in Charleston. He tried, but unsuccessfully, to encourage the colonists to focus on silk production. This crop, like cotton, was overlooked, and rice became the main staple of the region.

Attempt to establish the Episcopal church.

During his administration, the contests between the proprietors and the people increased. An attempt to establish the Episcopal church was added to other pre-existing causes of discord. The colony having been settled by emigrants from different nations, of different religious persuasions, the indiscreet endeavour to produce uniformity, could not fail to increase their irritation. The influence of the governor in the legislature obtained the passage of such acts as were necessary for his purpose; but many petitions against them were laid before parliament; and the house of lords presented so decisive an address to her majesty on the subject, that a writ of quo warranto against the charter was directed. This measure, however, was not put in execution; and the attention of the colonists was diverted, for a time, from these intestine broils, by the appearance of danger from abroad.

During his time in office, the conflicts between the landowners and the people grew. An attempt to establish the Episcopal Church added to other existing sources of disagreement. Since the colony was settled by immigrants from various nations with different religious beliefs, the reckless effort to enforce uniformity only increased their frustration. The governor used his influence in the legislature to pass the acts necessary for his agenda, but many petitions against them were submitted to parliament. The House of Lords issued a strong address to the queen on the matter, which led to a writ of quo warranto being directed against the charter. However, this action was not carried out, and the colonists' attention was temporarily shifted from these internal conflicts by the threat of danger from outside.

1704

Spain claimed the whole country, as part of Florida; and was preparing an expedition to enforce this claim. Governor Johnson, who had acquired some military skill in European service, having received intelligence of these preparations, made great exertions to fortify the entrance into the harbour of Charleston, and to put the province in a state of defence.

Spain claimed the entire area as part of Florida and was getting ready for an expedition to enforce this claim. Governor Johnson, who had gained some military expertise from his service in Europe, learned about these preparations and worked hard to strengthen the entrance to the port of Charleston and to prepare the province for defense.

There was reason to rejoice that these precautions were used; for, although no armament arrived from Europe, yet an expedition planned in the Havanna, was carried into execution.

There was reason to celebrate that these precautions were taken; for, although no weapons came from Europe, an expedition that was planned in Havana was carried out.

Colony invaded.

A French frigate and four armed Spanish sloops, commanded by Monsieur Le Febour, sailed for Charleston, with orders to touch at St. Augustine for men. His force is said to have amounted to about eight hundred. A government cruiser descried this squadron off the bar of St. Augustine, and brought the intelligence to Charleston. Scarcely had the captain delivered his information, when signals from Sullivan's island announced its appearance off the coast. The alarm was immediately given, and the militia of the town were under arms. In the evening the fleet reached Charleston bar, but deferred attempting to pass it until the morning.

A French frigate and four armed Spanish sloops, led by Monsieur Le Febour, set sail for Charleston, with orders to stop at St. Augustine for supplies. His crew was around eight hundred strong. A government cruiser spotted this squadron off the coast of St. Augustine and reported it to Charleston. Just after the captain shared his news, signals from Sullivan's Island indicated its arrival off the coast. The alarm was quickly raised, and the local militia got ready. In the evening, the fleet arrived at the Charleston bar but decided to wait until morning to try to pass through.

After consuming a day in sounding the south bar, the Spanish flotilla crossed it, and anchored above Sullivan's island. The governor then directed some pieces of heavy artillery to be placed in the vessels in the harbour; and gave the command of them to William Rhet. A summons to surrender being rejected, a party of the enemy landed on James' island, and burnt a few houses. Another party, consisting of one hundred and sixty men, landed, about the same time, on the opposite side of the river. Both these were attacked and defeated.

After spending a day exploring the south bar, the Spanish fleet crossed it and anchored near Sullivan's Island. The governor then ordered some heavy artillery to be positioned on the ships in the harbor and put William Rhet in charge of them. When a demand to surrender was turned down, a group of enemies landed on James Island and set fire to a few houses. At the same time, another group of one hundred sixty men landed on the opposite side of the river. Both groups were attacked and defeated.

Encouraged by this success, Johnson determined to attack the invaders by sea. In execution of this determination, Rhet, with six small vessels, proceeded down the river to the place where the hostile flotilla rode at anchor which, at his approach, precipitately re-crossed the bar. For some days it was believed that the enterprise was abandoned; but while the inhabitants were rejoicing at their deliverance, advice was received that a ship of force had been seen in Sewee bay, and had landed a number of men. On examining his prisoners, the governor was informed that the enemy had expected a ship of war with a reinforcement of two hundred men, under the command of Monsieur Arbuset. Taking his measures with the promptness of an experienced officer, he ordered captain Fenwick to pass the river, and march against the detachment which had landed; while Rhet, with two small armed vessels, sailed round by sea, with orders to meet the ship in Sewee bay. Fenwick came up with the party on shore, charged them briskly, and drove them to their ship, which, on the appearance of Rhet, surrendered without firing a shot. The prize with about ninety prisoners was brought up to Charleston.

Encouraged by this success, Johnson decided to attack the invaders by sea. To carry out this plan, Rhet, with six small boats, went down the river to the location where the enemy fleet was anchored. As he approached, the hostile ships quickly crossed back over the bar. For several days, it was thought that the mission had been abandoned; however, while the locals were celebrating their safety, news came in that a strong ship had been seen in Sewee Bay, and it had landed several men. After questioning his prisoners, the governor learned that the enemy had been expecting a warship with an additional two hundred men, led by Monsieur Arbuset. Acting swiftly like an experienced officer, he ordered Captain Fenwick to cross the river and march against the group that had landed, while Rhet, with two small armed vessels, sailed around by sea, instructed to meet the ship in Sewee Bay. Fenwick encountered the group on shore, charged them aggressively, and drove them back to their ship, which surrendered without firing a shot upon Rhet's arrival. The captured vessel, along with about ninety prisoners, was brought back to Charleston.

Thus was terminated with the loss of near three hundred men killed and prisoners, among the latter of whom were the general and some naval officers, the invasion of Carolina by Monsieur Le Febour. It seems to have been undertaken in the confidence that the colony was too weak for resistance; and was conducted without skill or courage.

Thus ended the invasion of Carolina by Monsieur Le Febour, resulting in the loss of nearly three hundred men killed and captured, including the general and some naval officers among the prisoners. It appears that the invasion was based on the belief that the colony was too weak to defend itself and was carried out without any skill or bravery.

Bills of credit.

To defray the expenses incurred in repelling this invasion, bills of credit to the amount of eight thousand pounds were issued. The effect of this emission was such a depreciation of the currency under the form of a rise in the price of commodities and of exchange, that one hundred and fifty pounds in paper, were given for one hundred pounds sterling.

To cover the costs of fighting off this invasion, bills of credit worth eight thousand pounds were issued. This resulted in a depreciation of the currency, shown by the increasing prices of goods and exchange rates, so that one hundred and fifty pounds in paper money were exchanged for one hundred pounds in sterling.

1707

Lord Granville, the palatine, a bigoted churchman, under whose influence violent measures had been taken for the establishment of religious conformity in Carolina, died in the year 1707. He was succeeded by lord Craven, who, though of the same religious tenets, supported them with moderation. His disposition to indulge, and thereby mollify, the dissenters, was considered by the zealots of the established church, as endangering religion; and the legislature, which was elected under the influence of the late palatine, and of his governor, dreading a change in the administration, 1708Legislature continues itself.adopted the extraordinary measure of continuing itself "for two years, and for the time and term of eighteen months after the change of government, whether by the death of the present governor, or the succession of another in his time."[126] Thus adding one other humiliating proof to those which perpetually occur, that principles are deplorably weak, when opposed by the passions.

Lord Granville, the palatine, a narrow-minded churchman, under whose influence harsh measures were taken to enforce religious conformity in Carolina, died in 1707. He was succeeded by Lord Craven, who, although sharing the same religious beliefs, advocated for them with moderation. His willingness to accommodate and thereby ease tensions with dissenters was seen by the extremists of the established church as a threat to religion; and the legislature, elected under the influence of the late palatine and his governor, fearing a shift in leadership, 1708Legislature carries on.took the unusual step of extending its term "for two years, and for the time and term of eighteen months after the change of government, whether by the death of the current governor or the succession of another during his term."[126] This became yet another humiliating example of how principles are tragically weak when faced with strong emotions.

1712
Massacre in North Carolina by the Indians.

In the year 1712, the Indians in North Carolina, alarmed, as their countrymen had been in the other colonies, by the increasing population and regular encroachments of the whites, formed with their accustomed secrecy, the plan of exterminating in one night these formidable neighbours. No indication of their design was given until they broke into the houses of the planters. The slaughter on Roanoke was immense. In that settlement alone, one hundred and thirty-seven persons were murdered. A few escaped by concealing themselves in the woods, who, the next day, gave the alarm. The remaining whites were collected together in a place of safety, and guarded by the militia until assistance could be received from South Carolina.

In 1712, the Native Americans in North Carolina, worried like their counterparts in other colonies about the growing population and constant invasions by white settlers, secretly planned to eliminate these powerful neighbors in a single night. They kept their intentions hidden until they broke into the planters' homes. The massacre on Roanoke was devastating. In that settlement alone, one hundred and thirty-seven people were killed. A few managed to escape by hiding in the woods and alerted others the next day. The remaining white settlers were gathered in a safe location and guarded by the militia until help could arrive from South Carolina.

This was prompt and effectual. The assembly at Charleston voted four thousand pounds for the service; and colonel Barnwell was detached with six hundred militia, and three hundred and sixty Indians, to the relief of the afflicted North Carolinians. With the utmost celerity he passed through the difficult and dangerous wilderness which then separated the northern from the southern settlements; Indians defeated.and, attacking the savages with unexpected fury, killed three hundred of them, and made one hundred prisoners. The survivors retreated to the Tuscorora town, and took refuge within a wooden breast-work, in which they were surrounded by the whites.

This was quick and effective. The assembly in Charleston voted four thousand pounds for the cause, and Colonel Barnwell was sent out with six hundred militia and three hundred sixty Native Americans to help the distressed people of North Carolina. He swiftly made his way through the challenging and risky wilderness that separated the northern and southern settlements; Indians lost. Attacking the enemy with surprising intensity, he killed three hundred of them and captured one hundred. The remaining survivors retreated to the Tuscarora town and sought safety behind a wooden fortification, where they were surrounded by the white settlers.

After sustaining considerable loss, they sued for peace and obtained it; but soon afterwards abandoned their country, and united themselves with the Iroquois, or Five nations.

After suffering significant losses, they sought peace and achieved it; but soon after, they abandoned their land and joined forces with the Iroquois, or Five Nations.

The expense of this expedition greatly transcended the scanty means of South Carolina. To supply the exigencies of government, and to promote the convenience of commerce, the legislature determined to issue forty-eight thousand pounds in bills of credit, to be denominated bank bills. This money was to be lent out, at interest, on security, and to be redeemed gradually by the annual payment of one-twelfth part of the sum loaned. The bills were made a legal tender; and the creditor who should refuse them, lost his debt.

The cost of this expedition far exceeded the limited resources of South Carolina. To meet the government's needs and support trade, the legislature decided to issue forty-eight thousand pounds in bills of credit, called bank bills. This money would be loaned out with interest, secured by collateral, and gradually paid back through annual payments of one-twelfth of the total loaned amount. The bills were designated as legal tender, meaning that if a creditor refused them, they would forfeit their debt.

After the emission of these bills, exchange rose, the first year, to one hundred and fifty, and in the second to two hundred per centum, above par. The effect of this depreciation, and of the tender laws which accompanied it, on creditors, and on morals, was obvious and certain.

After these bills were issued, the exchange rate increased to one hundred and fifty in the first year and to two hundred percent above par in the second year. The impact of this depreciation and the accompanying tender laws on creditors and on morals was clear and undeniable.


CHAPTER VIII.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... Intrigues of the French among the Indians.... War with the savages.... Peace.... Controversy with the governor.... Decided in England.... Contests concerning the governor's salary.... The assembly adjourned to Salem.... Contest concerning the salary terminated.... Great depreciation of the paper currency.... Scheme of a land bank.... Company dissolved by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Review of transactions in New York.

Proceedings of the legislature of Massachusetts.... Intrigues of the French with the Indigenous peoples.... War with the natives.... Peace.... Disputes with the governor.... Resolved in England.... Conflicts over the governor's salary.... The assembly adjourned to Salem.... Dispute over the salary ended.... Significant decline in the value of paper currency.... Proposal for a land bank.... Company shut down by act of Parliament.... Governor Shirley arrives.... Review of events in New York.

 

1714

The heavy expenses of Massachusetts during the late war had produced such large emissions of paper money, that a considerable depreciation took place, and specie disappeared. The consequent rise of exchange, instead of being attributed to its true cause, was ascribed to the decay of trade.

The high expenses of Massachusetts during the recent war led to a significant amount of paper money being issued, resulting in substantial depreciation and the disappearance of coins. The subsequent increase in exchange rates was mistakenly blamed on a decline in trade rather than its actual cause.

The colony, having now leisure for its domestic concerns, turned its attention to this interesting subject.

The colony, now having time to focus on its local issues, turned its attention to this interesting topic.

Affairs of Massachusetts.

Three parties were formed. The first, a small one, actuated by the principle that "honesty is the best policy," was in favour of calling in the paper money, and relying on the industry of the people, to replace it with a circulating medium of greater stability.

Three parties were formed. The first, a small one, driven by the idea that "honesty is the best policy," supported withdrawing the paper money and trusting in the hard work of the people to replace it with a more stable form of currency.

The second proposed a private bank, which was to issue bills of credit, to be received by all the members of the company, but at no certain value compared with gold and silver. It was not intended to deposit specie in the bank for the redemption of its notes as they might be offered; but to pledge real estates as security that the company would perform its engagements.

The second suggested a private bank that would issue credit notes, which all company members could accept, but their value compared to gold and silver wasn't fixed. The plan wasn't to put actual money in the bank to back its notes when they were presented; instead, they would use real estate as collateral to ensure the company would meet its obligations.

The third party was in favour of a loan of bills from the government, to any of the inhabitants who would mortgage real estate to secure their re-payment in a specified term of years; the interest to be paid annually, and applied to the support of government.

The third party supported a government loan program for any residents willing to mortgage their properties to guarantee repayment over a set number of years; the interest would be paid annually and used to fund the government.

The first party, perceiving its numerical weakness, joined the third; and the whole province was divided between a public and private bank.

The first group, noticing its small size, teamed up with the third; and the entire region was split between a public bank and a private bank.

At length, the party for the public bank prevailed in the general court, and fifty thousand pounds were issued and placed in the hands of trustees; to be lent for five years, at an interest of five per centum per annum, one-fifth part of the principal to be paid annually.

At last, the group supporting the public bank won in the general court, and fifty thousand pounds were issued and handed over to trustees; to be loaned for five years, at an interest of five percent per year, with one-fifth of the principal to be repaid annually.

1716

This scheme failing to improve the commerce of the colony, governor Shute, who had succeeded Dudley, reminded the assembly of the bad state of trade, which he ascribed to the scarcity of money; and recommended the consideration of some effectual measures to supply this want. The result of this recommendation was a second loan of one hundred thousand pounds for ten years, to be placed in the hands of commissioners in each county, in proportion to its taxes. The whole currency soon depreciated to such a degree, that the entire sum in circulation did not represent more real value, than was represented by that which was circulating before the emission. The governor had now sufficient leisure, and the general court furnished him with sufficient motives, to reflect on the policy he had recommended. An attempt to raise his salary as money depreciated, did not succeed, and only the usual nominal sum was voted for his support.

This plan didn’t improve trade in the colony, so Governor Shute, who took over from Dudley, reminded the assembly about the poor state of business, which he blamed on the lack of money. He suggested they think about some effective ways to address this issue. As a result, they approved a second loan of one hundred thousand pounds for ten years, to be managed by commissioners in each county according to its taxes. Soon, the entire currency lost its value to such an extent that the total amount in circulation was worth no more than what had been in use before the new money was issued. The governor now had enough time to think and the general court gave him enough reasons to reflect on the policies he had proposed. His attempt to raise his salary as the value of money declined didn’t work out, so only the usual nominal amount was approved for his support.

1719

In Massachusetts, peace abroad was the signal for dissension at home. Independent in her opinions and habits, she had been accustomed to consider herself rather as a sister kingdom, acknowledging one common sovereign with England, than as a colony. The election of all the branches of the legislature, a principle common to New England, contributed, especially while the mother country was occupied with her own internal divisions, to nourish these opinions and habits. Although the new charter of Massachusetts modified the independence of that colony, by vesting the appointment of the governor in the crown, yet the course of thinking which had prevailed from the settlement of the country, had gained too much strength to be immediately changed; and Massachusetts sought, by private influence over her chief magistrate, to compensate herself for the loss of his appointment. With this view, it had become usual for the general court to testify its satisfaction with his conduct by presents; and this measure was also adopted in other colonies.

In Massachusetts, peace overseas highlighted the disagreements at home. Independent in her views and ways, she had come to see herself more as a sister kingdom sharing one common ruler with England than simply a colony. The election of all parts of the legislature—a practice common in New England—fueled these views and habits, especially while the mother country dealt with its own internal conflicts. Although the new charter of Massachusetts changed the colony's independence by giving the crown the power to appoint the governor, the mindset that had emerged since the settlement of the area was too strong to be changed immediately. Massachusetts tried to regain some influence over her governor through private channels to make up for losing the appointment power. To achieve this, it became common for the general court to show its approval of his actions through gifts, a practice also seen in other colonies.

Apprehending that this practice might dispose the governors to conciliate the legislatures at the expense of their duty to the crown, the Queen had given peremptory orders to receive no more gifts; and to obtain acts fixing their salaries permanently at a sum named by herself. The mandate respecting presents was, of course, obeyed; and some of the colonies complied with the requisition respecting the salary; but in Massachusetts and New York, it was steadily resisted.

Understanding that this practice could lead the governors to placate the legislatures at the cost of their responsibilities to the crown, the Queen had issued strict orders to refuse any more gifts and to establish laws setting their salaries permanently at an amount she specified. The order regarding gifts was, naturally, followed, and some of the colonies complied with the request concerning salaries; however, Massachusetts and New York consistently fought against it.

A controlling power over salaries was a source of influence which was pertinaciously maintained; and its efficacy was tried in all the conflicts between Massachusetts and her governor. Almost every important measure brought before the legislature, was productive of contests between these departments. They disagreed, not only on the policy of particular acts, but on the limits of their power. The governor claimed the right of negativing the speaker chosen by the representatives, which was denied by them; and, each party persisting in its pretensions, the assembly was dissolved, and new elections took place. The same members being generally re-chosen, the house of representatives assembled with increased irritation, and passed some angry resolutions respecting its dissolution. The governor, in turn, charged the house with encroachments on the power of the executive; among other instances of which, he mentioned certain resolutions passed on the commencement of hostilities by the Indians, which were deemed equivalent to a declaration of war, and had therefore been rejected.

A controlling power over salaries was a source of influence that was stubbornly maintained, and its effectiveness was tested in all the conflicts between Massachusetts and its governor. Almost every significant measure brought before the legislature led to disputes between these branches. They disagreed not just on the policies of specific actions but also on the limits of their authority. The governor asserted the right to veto the speaker chosen by the representatives, which they rejected; and with each side holding firm to its claims, the assembly was dissolved, prompting new elections. The same members were usually re-elected, and the house of representatives convened with heightened frustration, passing some heated resolutions regarding its dissolution. The governor, in response, accused the house of overstepping its bounds, citing instances such as certain resolutions adopted at the start of hostilities with the Indians, which were seen as equivalent to a declaration of war and were therefore dismissed.

1721

Disagreements were multiplied between them. Paper money and trade were inexhaustible sources of discontent. New elections produced no change of temper. After war was formally declared against the Indians, the house endeavoured to exercise executive powers in its prosecution; and, the council not concurring with them, the representatives attempted, in one instance, to act alone.

Disagreements increased between them. Paper money and trade were endless sources of frustration. New elections brought no change in attitude. After war was officially declared against the Indians, the house tried to take on executive powers to carry it out; however, since the council didn’t agree, the representatives attempted to act independently on one occasion.

The measures recommended by the governor to successive assemblies, were disregarded; irritating resolves were adopted and reiterated; and a course of angry crimination and recrimination took place between them in the progress of which the governor's salary was reduced in its nominal as well as real amount; and the sum granted, instead of being voted, as had been usual, at the commencement of the session, was reserved to its close.

The measures suggested by the governor to successive assemblies were ignored; frustrating resolutions were passed and repeated; and a cycle of bitter blame and counter-blame ensued between them during which the governor's salary was cut both in name and in actual value; and the amount approved, instead of being voted on, as was customary, at the beginning of the session, was held off until its end.

1722

In the midst of these contests, governor Shute, who had privately solicited and obtained leave to return to England, suddenly embarked on board the Sea Horse man of war, leaving the controversy concerning the extent of the executive power, to devolve on the lieutenant governor.[127]

In the middle of these conflicts, Governor Shute, who had secretly requested and received permission to go back to England, suddenly boarded the Sea Horse warship, leaving the dispute about the scope of executive power to be handled by the lieutenant governor.[127]

The house of representatives persisted in asserting its control over objects which had been deemed within the province of the executive; but its resolutions were generally negatived by the council. This produced some altercation between the two branches of the legislature; but they at length united in the passage of a resolution desiring their agent in England to take the best measures for protecting the interests of the colony, which were believed to be in danger from the representations of governor Shute.

The House of Representatives kept insisting on its authority over matters that were considered to fall under the executive branch; however, its resolutions were usually rejected by the council. This caused some conflict between the two parts of the legislature, but eventually, they came together to pass a resolution asking their representative in England to take the best actions to protect the colony's interests, which were thought to be at risk due to Governor Shute's statements.

Intrigues of the French with the Indians.

During these contests in the interior, the frontiers had suffered severely from the depredations of the Indians. The French had acquired great influence over all the eastern tribes. Jesuit missionaries generally resided among them, who obtained a great ascendancy in their councils. After the cession of Nova Scotia to Great Britain, father Rahlé, a missionary residing among the savages of that province exerted successfully all his address to excite their jealousies and resentments against the English. By his acts, and those of other missionaries, all the eastern Indians, as well as those of Canada, were combined against New England. They made incursions into Massachusetts, in consequence of which, some troops were detached to the village in which Rahlé resided, for the purpose of seizing his person. He received intimation of their approach in time to make his escape; but they secured his papers, among which were some showing that in exciting the savages to war against the English colonists, he had acted under the authority of the governor of Canada, who had secretly promised to supply them with arms and ammunition.

During these conflicts in the interior, the frontiers had suffered greatly from attacks by Native Americans. The French had gained significant influence over all the eastern tribes, with Jesuit missionaries typically living among them, gaining considerable sway in their councils. After Nova Scotia was ceded to Great Britain, Father Rahlé, a missionary living among the Indigenous people of that province, skillfully worked to stir up their jealousy and anger towards the English. Through his actions and those of other missionaries, all the eastern Native Americans, as well as those from Canada, united against New England. They launched raids into Massachusetts, prompting the deployment of troops to the village where Rahlé lived, in an attempt to capture him. He learned of their approach in time to escape, but they managed to secure his documents, some of which revealed that while encouraging the Indigenous people to fight against the English colonists, he had acted on the authority of the governor of Canada, who had secretly promised to provide them with weapons and ammunition.

1726

Envoys were deputed with a remonstrance against conduct so incompatible with the state of peace then subsisting between France and England. The governor received this embassy politely, and, at first, denied any interference in the quarrel, alleging that the Indians were independent nations who made war and peace without being controlled by him. On being shown his letters to Rahlé, he changed his language, and gave assurances of his future good offices in effecting a peace. On the faith of these assurances, conferences were held with some Indian chiefs then in Canada; several captives were ransomed; Peace.and, soon after the return of the commissioners to New England, the war was terminated by a treaty of peace signed at Boston.[128]

Envoys were sent with a protest against actions that were completely at odds with the peace agreement between France and England. The governor welcomed this delegation politely and initially denied any involvement in the conflict, claiming that the Indians were independent nations that declared war and made peace without his control. However, when presented with his letters to Rahlé, he changed his tone and promised to help facilitate peace. Based on these promises, discussions were held with some Indian chiefs in Canada; several captives were freed; Peace. and soon after the commissioners returned to New England, the war ended with a peace treaty signed in Boston.[128]

Decision against the house on the controversy with the governor.

Meanwhile the complaints of governor Shute against the house of representatives were heard in England. Every question was decided against the house. In most of them, the existing charter was deemed sufficiently explicit; but, on two points, it was thought advisable to have explanatory articles. These were, the right of the governor to negative the appointment of the speaker, and the right of the house on the subject of the adjournment. New Charter.An explanatory charter therefore affirming the power claimed by the governor to negative a speaker, and denying to the house of representatives the right of adjourning itself for a longer time than two days. This charter was submitted to the general court, to be accepted or refused; but it was accompanied with the intimation that, in the event of its being refused, the whole controversy between the governor and house of representatives would be laid before Parliament. The conduct of the representatives had been so generally condemned in England, as to excite fears that an act to vacate the charter would be the consequence of a parliamentary inquiry. The temper of the house too had undergone a change. The violence and irritation which marked its proceedings in the contest with governor Shute had subsided; and a majority determined to accept the new charter.

Meanwhile, Governor Shute's complaints against the House of Representatives were heard in England. Every issue was decided against the House. In most cases, the existing charter was considered clear enough; however, on two points, it was deemed necessary to have clarifying articles. These points were the governor's right to veto the appointment of the speaker and the House's right regarding adjournments. New Charter. An explanatory charter was therefore established, confirming the governor's power to veto a speaker and stating that the House of Representatives could not adjourn for more than two days. This charter was presented to the General Court for approval or rejection; however, it came with a warning that if it were rejected, the entire dispute between the governor and the House of Representatives would be referred to Parliament. The actions of the representatives had been widely criticized in England, raising concerns that a parliamentary investigation might lead to the charter being revoked. Additionally, the House's attitude had changed. The aggression and frustration that characterized its interactions with Governor Shute had diminished, and a majority decided to accept the new charter.

1727

The trade of the province still languished, and complaints of the scarcity of money were as loud as when only specie was in circulation. To remedy these evils, a bill for emitting a farther sum in paper passed both houses, but was rejected by the lieutenant governor, as being inconsistent with his instructions. The house of representatives, thereupon, postponed the consideration of salaries till the next session. The assembly was then adjourned at its own request, and, after a recess of a fortnight, was again convened. As an expedient to elude the instructions to the governor which interdicted his assent to any act for issuing bills of credit, except for charges of government, a bill passed with the title of "an act for raising and settling a public revenue for and towards defraying the necessary charges of government, by an emission of sixty thousand pounds in bills of credit." This bill providing for the payment of the salaries to which several members of the council were entitled, passed that house also; and the lieutenant governor gave a reluctant assent to it. Its passage into a law furnishes strong evidence of the influence which the control over salaries gave to the house of representatives.

The province's trade was still struggling, and the complaints about the lack of money were just as loud as when only coins were in use. To address these issues, a bill to create more paper money passed both houses but was vetoed by the lieutenant governor because it went against his instructions. The house of representatives then decided to postpone discussions about salaries until the next session. The assembly was adjourned at its own request and, after a two-week break, gathered again. To work around the governor's instructions that prohibited him from approving any act for issuing credit bills, except for government expenses, a bill titled "an act for raising and settling a public revenue for and towards defraying the necessary charges of government, by an emission of sixty thousand pounds in bills of credit" was passed. This bill, which provided funds for the salaries owed to several council members, also passed that house, and the lieutenant governor reluctantly approved it. The passage of this law clearly shows the power the house of representatives held due to control over salaries.

1728
Contest respecting salary.

Mr. Burnet, who had been appointed governor of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, was received with great pomp in Boston. At the first meeting of the assembly, he stated the King's instructions to insist on an established salary, and his intention firmly to adhere to them. The assembly was not less firm in its determination to resist this demand; and, that no additional and unnecessary obloquy might be encountered, resolved, not to mingle any difference concerning the amount of the salary, with the great question of its depending on the will of the legislature. As soon therefore as the compliments usual on the arrival of a governor had passed, the house voted one thousand seven hundred pounds towards his support, and to defray the charges of his journey. This vote was understood to give him, as a present salary, a sum equal to one thousand pounds sterling per annum. The governor declared his inability to assent to this bill, it being inconsistent with his instructions. After a week's deliberation, the assembly granted three hundred pounds for the expenses of his journey, which he accepted; and, in a distinct vote, the farther sum of one thousand four hundred pounds was granted toward his support. The latter vote was accompanied with a joint message from both houses, wherein they asserted their undoubted right as Englishmen, and their privilege by the charter, to raise and apply money for the support of government; and their willingness to give the governor an ample and honourable support; but they apprehended it would be most for his majesty's service to do so without establishing a fixed salary. The governor returned an answer on the same day, in which he said, that, if they really intended to give him an ample and honourable support, they could have no just objection to making their purpose effectual by fixing his salary; for he would never accept a grant of the kind then offered.

Mr. Burnet, who had been appointed governor of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, was welcomed with great ceremony in Boston. At the first assembly meeting, he outlined the King’s instructions to insist on a set salary and his intention to stick to them. The assembly was equally determined to resist this demand, and to avoid any unnecessary controversy, they decided not to mix the issue of the salary amount with the significant question of whether it depended on the legislature's approval. So, after the usual welcoming formalities for a governor, the house voted to allocate one thousand seven hundred pounds for his support and to cover his travel expenses. This vote was interpreted as providing him with an effective salary of one thousand pounds sterling per year. The governor stated that he couldn't agree to this bill as it conflicted with his instructions. After a week of deliberation, the assembly granted him three hundred pounds for his travel expenses, which he accepted; and in a separate vote, they allocated an additional one thousand four hundred pounds for his support. This latter vote came with a joint message from both houses, asserting their undeniable right as Englishmen, along with their charter privilege, to raise and allocate funds for the support of government. They expressed their willingness to provide the governor with significant and honorable support, but they believed it would be best for the king's interests if this was done without establishing a fixed salary. The governor replied on the same day, stating that if they genuinely intended to provide him with substantial and honorable support, they shouldn't have any real objections to making their intention effective by setting his salary, as he would never accept the type of grant they were currently offering.

The council was disposed to avoid the contest, and to grant a salary to the present governor for a certain time; but the house of representatives, remaining firm to its purpose, sent a message to the governor requesting that the court might rise. He answered, that a compliance with this request would put it out of the power of the legislature to pay immediate regard to the King's instructions; and he would not grant a recess, until the business of the session should be finished. The representatives then declared that, "in faithfulness to the people, they could not come into an act for establishing a salary on the governor or commander in chief for the time being," and, therefore, renewed their request that the court might rise.

The council wanted to avoid the conflict and suggested giving the current governor a salary for a certain period. However, the house of representatives stood firm and sent a message to the governor asking for the court to adjourn. He replied that agreeing to this request would prevent the legislature from following the King’s instructions promptly, and he wouldn’t allow a recess until the session's work was complete. The representatives then stated that "to be true to the people, they could not support a measure to establish a salary for the governor or commander in chief at that time," and so they repeated their request for the court to adjourn.

Both the governor and the house of representatives seem, thus far, to have made their declarations with some reserve. A salary during his own administration might, perhaps, have satisfied him, though he demanded that one should be settled, generally, on the commander in chief for the time being; and the house had not yet declared against settling a salary on him for a limited time. Each desired that the other should make some concession. Both declined; both were irritated by long altercation; and, at length, instead of mutually advancing fixed at the opposite extremes. After several ineffectual efforts on each side, the representatives sent a message to the governor, stating at large the motives which induced the resolution they had formed. The governor returned a prompt answer, in which he also detailed the reasons in support of the demand he had made. These two papers, manifesting the principles and objects of both parties, deserve attention even at this period.

Both the governor and the House of Representatives have so far approached their statements with some caution. A salary during his own term might have made him content, even though he insisted that a salary be established, in general, for the commander in chief at that time; and the House had not yet opposed setting a salary for him for a limited period. Each side wanted the other to make some kind of compromise. Both refused, and both grew frustrated after long discussions; eventually, instead of working together, they ended up firmly on opposite sides. After several unsuccessful attempts from both sides, the representatives sent a message to the governor outlining the reasons behind their decision. The governor quickly replied, also detailing the reasons supporting his demand. These two documents, which reflect the principles and goals of both parties, are worth considering even now.

The house, not long after receiving this message, far from making any advances towards a compliance with his request, came to two resolutions strongly expressive of its determination not to recede from the ground which had been taken.

The house, shortly after getting this message, instead of moving towards fulfilling his request, made two decisions that clearly showed its determination not to back down from the position it had taken.

These resolutions gave the first indication, on the part of the representatives, of a fixed purpose to make no advance towards a compromise. They induced the governor to remind the court of the danger to which the proceedings of that body might expose the charter. This caution did not deter the house from preparing, and transmitting to the several towns of the province a statement of the controversy, which concludes with saying, "we dare neither come into a fixed salary on the governor for ever, nor for a limited time, for the following reasons:

These resolutions were the first sign from the representatives that they were intent on making no movement toward a compromise. They prompted the governor to remind the court of the risks that the actions of that body could pose to the charter. This warning didn’t stop the house from preparing and sending out to the various towns in the province a statement about the controversy, which ends by saying, "we dare not agree to a fixed salary for the governor either permanently or for a limited time, for the following reasons:

First, Because it is an untrodden path which neither we, nor our predecessors have gone in, and we cannot certainly foresee the many dangers that may be in it, nor can we depart from that way which has been found safe and comfortable.

First, because it’s an unexplored path that neither we nor those before us have taken, and we can’t reliably predict the many dangers that might be on it, nor can we stray from the route that has been proven safe and comfortable.

Secondly, Because it is the undoubted right of all Englishmen, by magna charta, to raise and dispose of money for the public service, of their own free accord, without compulsion.

Secondly, because it's the undeniable right of all English people, by magna charta, to raise and spend money for public service on their own terms, without any pressure.

Thirdly, Because it must necessarily lessen the dignity and freedom of the house of representatives, in making acts, and raising and applying taxes, &c. and, consequently, cannot be thought a proper method to preserve that balance in the three branches of the legislature, which seems necessary to form, maintain, and uphold, the constitution.

Thirdly, because it will inevitably reduce the dignity and freedom of the House of Representatives when making laws, collecting, and using taxes, etc., it cannot be considered a suitable way to maintain the balance among the three branches of the legislature that is essential for forming, maintaining, and upholding the Constitution.

Fourthly, Because the charter fully empowers the general assembly to make such laws and orders as they shall judge for the good and welfare of the inhabitants; and if they, or any part of them, judge this not to be for their good, they neither ought nor could come into it, for, as to act beyond or without the powers granted in the charter might justly incur the King's displeasure, so not to act up and agreeable to those powers, might justly be deemed a betraying of the rights and privileges therein granted; and if they should give up this right, they would open a door to many other inconveniences."

Fourthly, the charter gives the general assembly full authority to create laws and orders that they believe are in the best interest of the people. If they, or any part of them, feel that this isn't beneficial, they shouldn’t be involved. Acting outside the powers granted by the charter could rightfully upset the King, just as failing to act in alignment with those powers could be seen as betraying the rights and privileges it provides. If they were to give up this right, it would lead to many other problems.

Many messages passed in quick succession between the governor and the house, in the course of which the arguments stated in the papers which have been mentioned, were enlarged and diversified. At length, the house repeated its request for an adjournment; but the governor replied that "unless his majesty's pleasure had due weight with them, their desires would have very little with him."

Many messages were exchanged rapidly between the governor and the house, during which the arguments presented in the previously mentioned documents were expanded and varied. Finally, the house reiterated its request for a break; however, the governor responded that "unless the king's wishes were significant to them, their requests would hold little importance to him."

The council now interposed with a resolution declaring "that it is expedient for the court to ascertain a sum as a salary for his excellency's support, as also the term of time for its continuance." This resolution was transmitted to the house of representatives, and immediately rejected.

The council now stepped in with a resolution stating "that it is necessary for the court to determine a salary amount for his excellency's support, as well as the duration for which it will last." This resolution was sent to the house of representatives and was promptly rejected.

After much controversy, a small seeming advance towards an accommodation was made. Instead of voting a salary, as had been usual, for half a year, a grant was made to the governor of three thousand pounds, equal to one thousand pounds sterling, to enable him to manage the affairs of the province. This was generally understood to be a salary for a year. The governor having withheld his assent from this vote, the house entreated him to accept the grant; and added "we cannot doubt but that succeeding assemblies, according to the ability of the province, will be very ready to grant as ample a support; and if they should not, your excellency will then have an opportunity of showing your resentment." The governor however persisted to withhold his assent from the vote.

After a lot of debate, there was a small step toward making an agreement. Instead of voting for a salary as had been the custom for six months, a grant of three thousand pounds, equal to one thousand pounds sterling, was given to the governor to help him manage the province's affairs. This was generally seen as a salary for a year. When the governor refused to approve this vote, the assembly urged him to accept the grant, saying, "We have no doubt that future assemblies will be eager to provide as much support as the province can afford; and if they don't, you will then have a chance to express your dissatisfaction." However, the governor continued to refuse to approve the vote.

The colony generally, and especially Boston, was opposed to a compliance with the instructions of the crown. At a general meeting of the inhabitants, the town passed a vote, purporting to be unanimous against fixing a salary on the governor. Adjournment of the Assembly to Salem.In consequence of this vote, and of an opinion that the members of the house were influenced by the inhabitants of the town, the governor determined to change the place at which the court should hold its session; and on the 24th of October, adjourned it to the 30th then to meet at Salem, in the country of Essex.

The colony as a whole, and especially Boston, was against following the crown's instructions. At a general meeting of the residents, the town passed a vote, claiming to be unanimous in opposing the governor's salary. Adjournment of the Assembly to Salem. As a result of this vote and the belief that the house members were swayed by the townspeople, the governor decided to change the location for the court's session; he adjourned it on October 24th to meet on the 30th in Salem, in Essex County.

Change of place did not change the temper of the house. This was not, as in the contests with governor Shute, an angry altercation, into which the representatives were precipitated by a restless and encroaching temper, but a solemn and deliberate stand, made in defence of a right believed to be unquestionable, and of a principle deemed essential to the welfare of the colony. The ground taken was considered well, and maintained with firmness. Votes and messages of the same tenor with those which had been often repeated, continued to pass between the representatives and the governor, until the subject was entirely exhausted. Each party being determined to adhere to its principles, the house met and adjourned daily, without entering on business.

Changing the location didn't affect the house's attitude. This wasn't like the confrontations with Governor Shute, which were heated arguments fueled by a restless and aggressive spirit. Instead, this was a serious and intentional position taken to defend a right that was believed to be indisputable, and a principle seen as vital for the colony's well-being. The stance was carefully considered and upheld with determination. Votes and messages similar to those that had been repeated many times continued to flow between the representatives and the governor until the issue was completely exhausted. Each side was resolute in sticking to its principles, so the house met and adjourned daily without conducting any business.

In the mean time, the governor received no salary. To the members of Boston, who had not been accustomed to the expense of attending the legislature at a distant place, a compensation, above their ordinary wages, was made by that town.

In the meantime, the governor didn’t receive a salary. For the residents of Boston, who weren’t used to the costs of attending the legislature far away, the town provided compensation above their usual wages.

The house, firmly persuaded of the propriety of its conduct, prepared a memorial to the King praying a change in the royal instructions to the governor. Agents were appointed to represent the general court in England, and a vote was passed for defraying the expenses attendant on the business. The council refused to concur in this vote, because the agents had been appointed by the house of representatives singly; and the measure must have been abandoned for want of money, had not the inhabitants of Boston raised the sum required, by subscription.

The house, convinced of the righteousness of its actions, prepared a formal request to the King asking for a change in the royal instructions to the governor. They appointed agents to represent the general court in England, and a vote was passed to cover the expenses involved in this effort. However, the council declined to support this vote because the agents had been appointed solely by the house of representatives; the initiative would have been dropped for lack of funds if the residents of Boston hadn't raised the necessary amount through donations.

1729

Letters were soon received from these agents, inclosing a report from the board of trade, before whom they had been heard by council, entirely disapproving the conduct of the house. The letters also indicated that, should the house persist in its refusal to comply with the King's instructions, the affair might be carried before parliament. But, should even this happen, the agents thought it more advisable that the salary should be fixed by the supreme legislature, than by that of the province. "It was better," they said, "that the liberties of the people should be taken from them, than given up by themselves."

Letters quickly arrived from these agents, including a report from the board of trade, where they had been heard by council, completely disapproving the actions of the house. The letters also suggested that if the house continued to refuse to follow the King's instructions, the matter might be taken to parliament. However, even if that occurred, the agents believed it would be better for the salary to be determined by the supreme legislature rather than by the provincial one. "It is better," they said, "for the people's rights to be taken from them than for them to give them up voluntarily."

The governor, at length, refused to sign a warrant on the treasury for the wages of the members. "One branch of the legislature," he said, "might as well go without their pay as the other." The act, and the reason for it, were alike unsatisfactory to the house.

The governor eventually refused to authorize a payment from the treasury for the members' salaries. "One branch of the legislature," he said, "might as well go without their pay as the other." Both the action and the reasoning behind it were equally dissatisfying to the house.

Death of Governor Burnet.

After a recess from the 20th of December to the 2d of April, the general court met again at Salem. Repeated meetings at that place having produced no accommodation, the governor adjourned the legislature to Cambridge. A few days after the commencement of the session, he was seized with a fever, of which he died.

After a break from December 20th to April 2nd, the general court reconvened in Salem. Since multiple meetings there had failed to reach an agreement, the governor moved the legislature to Cambridge. A few days into the session, he came down with a fever and passed away.

Mr. Burnet is said to have possessed many valuable qualities; and, had he not been engaged, by a sense of duty, in this long contest, he would, in all probability, have been a favourite of the province.[129]

Mr. Burnet is said to have had many valuable qualities, and if he hadn’t been committed, out of a sense of duty, to this long struggle, he likely would have been a favorite among the people of the province.[129]

1730
Arrival of Governor Belcher.

Mr. Belcher, who succeeded Burnet, arrived at Boston early in August where he was cordially received. At the first meeting of the general court, he pressed the establishment of a permanent salary, and laid before them his instructions, in which it was declared that, in the event of the continued refusal of the assembly, "his majesty will find himself under the necessity of laying the undutiful behaviour of the province before the legislature of Great Britain, not only in this single instance, but in many others of the same nature and tendency, whereby it manifestly appears that this assembly, for some years last past, have attempted, by unwarrantable practices, to weaken, if not cast off, the obedience they owe to the crown, and the dependence which all colonies ought to have on the mother country."

Mr. Belcher, who took over from Burnet, arrived in Boston early in August, where he was warmly welcomed. At the first meeting of the general court, he pushed for a permanent salary and presented his instructions, which stated that if the assembly continued to refuse, "his majesty will find himself forced to bring the province's disrespectful behavior before the legislature of Great Britain, not just in this one instance, but in many others of a similar nature, showing that this assembly, for the past several years, has tried through unjust practices to weaken, if not completely cast off, the obedience they owe to the crown and the dependence all colonies should have on the mother country."

At the close of these instructions, his majesty added his expectation, "that they do forthwith comply with this proposal, as the last signification of our royal pleasure to them on this subject, and if the said assembly shall not think fit to comply therewith, it is our will and pleasure, and you are required, immediately, to come over to this kingdom of Great Britain, in order to give us an exact account of all that shall have passed on this subject, that we may lay the same before our parliament."

At the end of these instructions, his majesty expressed his expectation, "that they immediately agree to this proposal, as the final indication of our royal wishes on this matter, and if the assembly decides not to comply, it is our will and you are required to come to this kingdom of Great Britain right away to provide us with a complete account of everything that has happened regarding this issue, so we can present it to our parliament."

The house proceeded, as in the case of governor Burnet, to make a grant to Mr. Belcher of one thousand pounds currency for defraying the expense of his voyage, and as a gratuity for his services while the agent of the colony in England; and, some time after, voted a sum equal to one thousand pounds sterling to enable him to manage the public affairs, &c.; but fixed no time for which the allowance was made. The council concurred in this vote, adding an amendment "and that the same sum be annually allowed for the governor's support." The house not agreeing to this amendment, the council carried it so as to read "that the same sum should be annually paid during his excellency's continuance in the government, and residence here." This also was disagreed to and the resolution fell.

The house proceeded, similar to what happened with Governor Burnet, to grant Mr. Belcher one thousand pounds in currency to cover his travel expenses, as well as a bonus for his services while being the colony's agent in England. Later on, they approved an additional amount equal to one thousand pounds sterling to help him handle public affairs, but they didn’t specify a time for which the allowance was intended. The council agreed with this vote, adding an amendment stating "and that the same sum be paid annually for the governor's support." The house did not agree to this amendment, so the council modified it to say "that the same sum should be paid annually as long as his excellency is in office and residing here." This was also rejected, and the resolution failed.

The small-pox being in the town of Cambridge, the assembly was adjourned to Roxbury.

The smallpox outbreak in Cambridge led to the assembly being moved to Roxbury.

Two or three sessions passed with little more, on the part of the governor, than a repetition of his demand for a fixed salary, and an intimation that he should be obliged to return to England, and state the conduct of the house of representatives to the King. Some unsuccessful attempts were made by his friends to pass a bill fixing the salary during his administration, with a protest against the principle, and against that bill's being drawn into precedent. Failing in this expedient, and finding the house inflexible, he despaired of succeeding with that body, and turned his attention to the relaxation of his instructions. 1731He advised an address from the house to his majesty, praying that he might be permitted to receive the sum which the legislature had offered to grant him. This was allowed by the crown; with the understanding that he was still to insist on a compliance with his instructions. Leave to accept particular grants was obtained for two or three years successively; and, at length, a general permission was conceded to accept such sums as might be given by the assembly.[130]

Two or three sessions went by with little change from the governor, just a repetition of his request for a fixed salary and a hint that he would have to go back to England to report the behavior of the house of representatives to the King. His friends made some unsuccessful attempts to pass a bill that would set his salary during his time in office, while protesting against the principle and asserting that the bill shouldn't set a precedent. After failing in this effort and realizing the house wasn't budging, he gave up on succeeding with them and shifted his focus to easing his instructions. 1731 He suggested that the house send a message to the king, asking for permission to accept the amount the legislature had offered him. The crown approved this with the condition that he would still need to insist on following his instructions. For two or three consecutive years, he was granted permission to accept specific donations, and finally, he received a general permission to accept any funds that might be given by the assembly.[130]

Contest concerning the salary terminated.

Thus was terminated, the stubborn contest concerning a permanent salary for the governor. Its circumstances have been given more in detail than consists with the general plan of this work, because it is considered as exhibiting, in genuine colours, the character of the people engaged in it. It is regarded as an early and an honourable display of the same persevering temper in defence of principle, of the same unconquerable spirit of liberty, which at a later day, and on a more important question, tore the British colonies from a country to which they had been strongly attached.

Thus ended the stubborn battle over the governor's permanent salary. The details have been provided more thoroughly than usual for this work because they genuinely reflect the character of the people involved. It is seen as an early and honorable demonstration of the same determination in defense of principles and the same unyielding spirit of liberty that, later on, on a more significant issue, led the British colonies to break away from a country they had been deeply connected to.

1733

The immense quantity of depreciated paper which was in circulation throughout New England, had no tendency to diminish the complaints of the scarcity of money. Massachusetts and New Hampshire were restrained from farther emissions by the instructions to their governors, who received their appointments from the crown. Connecticut, engaged chiefly in agricultural pursuits, suffered less from this depreciated medium than her neighbours, and was less disposed to increase its evils. Rhode Island, equally commercial with Massachusetts, and equally fond of paper, chose her own governor, and might therefore indulge, without restraint, her passion for a system alike unfavourable to morals and to industry. That colony now issued one hundred thousand pounds on loan, to its inhabitants, for twenty years. The merchants of Boston, apprehensive that this capital would transfer the stock of Massachusetts to Rhode Island, associated against receiving the new emission; and many of them formed a company which issued one hundred and ten thousand pounds, redeemable with specie, in ten years, a tenth part annually, at the then current value of paper. The association against receiving the new emission of Rhode Island was not long observed; and the bills of New Hampshire and Connecticut were also current. Silver immediately rose to twenty-seven shillings the ounce, and the notes issued by the merchants soon disappeared, leaving in circulation only the government paper.

The huge amount of devalued paper money circulating in New England did nothing to ease the complaints about money being scarce. Massachusetts and New Hampshire were stopped from issuing more money due to instructions given to their governors, who were appointed by the crown. Connecticut, mainly focused on farming, was less affected by this devalued currency than its neighbors and was less inclined to worsen the situation. Rhode Island, as commercial as Massachusetts and equally attached to paper money, elected its own governor and could therefore freely pursue a system that was detrimental to both morals and industry. That colony just issued one hundred thousand pounds in loans to its residents for twenty years. The merchants in Boston, worried that this money would shift resources from Massachusetts to Rhode Island, banded together to refuse the new currency. Many of them created a company that issued one hundred and ten thousand pounds, redeemable in cash within ten years, with a tenth repaid each year at the current value of paper. The association against accepting the new Rhode Island currency didn't last long, and the bills from New Hampshire and Connecticut were also in use. Silver quickly rose to twenty-seven shillings per ounce, and the notes issued by the merchants soon vanished, leaving only government-issued paper in circulation.

1739

Great uneasiness prevailed through Massachusetts on this subject. The last instalment of the bills would become due in 1741, and no power existed to redeem them by new emissions. Serious consequences were apprehended from calling in the circulating medium without substituting another in its place, and the alarm was increased by the circumstance that the taxes had been so lightly apportioned on the first years, as to require the imposition of heavy burdens for the redemption of what remained in circulation. The discontents excited by these causes were manifested in the elections, and were directed against the governor, who was openly hostile to the paper system.

Great unease spread throughout Massachusetts regarding this issue. The final payment on the bills was due in 1741, and there was no authority to issue new ones to replace them. People feared serious consequences from withdrawing the circulating currency without providing an alternative, and the concern grew because the taxes had been so lightly distributed in the early years that it would now be necessary to impose heavy burdens to redeem what was still in circulation. The dissatisfaction caused by these factors was evident in the elections and was aimed at the governor, who was openly against the paper currency system.

Land bank.

The projector of the bank again came forward; and, placing himself at the head of seven or eight hundred persons, some of whom possessed property, proposed to form a company which should issue one hundred and fifty thousand pounds in bills. By this scheme, every borrower of a sum larger than one hundred pounds, was to mortgage real estate to secure its re-payment. The borrowers of smaller sums might secure their re-payment either by mortgage, or by bond with two securities. Each subscriber, or partner was to pay, annually, three per centum interest on the sum he should take, and five per centum of the principal, either in the bills themselves, or in the produce and manufactures of the country, at such rates as the directors should, from time to time, establish.

The bank's projector stepped forward again and, standing in front of around seven or eight hundred people, some of whom owned property, suggested forming a company to issue one hundred and fifty thousand pounds in bills. With this plan, anyone borrowing more than one hundred pounds would have to mortgage real estate to ensure repayment. Those borrowing smaller amounts could secure their repayment either through a mortgage or by a bond with two guarantors. Each subscriber, or partner, would need to pay three percent interest annually on the amount they borrowed, plus five percent of the principal, either in the bills themselves or in the country's goods and products, at rates set by the directors as needed.

Although the favourers of this project were so successful at the elections as to obtain a great majority in the general court, men of fortune, and the principal merchants, refused to receive these bills. Many small traders, however, and other persons interested in the circulation of a depreciated currency, gave them credit. The directors themselves, it was said, became traders; and issued bills without limitation, and without giving security for their redemption. The governor, anticipating the pernicious effects of the institution, exerted all his influence against it. He displaced such executive officers as were members of it, and negatived the speaker, and thirteen members elected to the council, who were also of the company. 1740Company dissolved.General confusion being apprehended, application was made to parliament for an act to suppress the company. This being readily obtained, the company was dissolved, and the holders of the bills were allowed their action against its members, individually.[131]

Although the supporters of this project were quite successful in the elections, securing a significant majority in the general court, wealthy individuals and leading merchants refused to accept these bills. Many small traders and others who benefited from a devalued currency, however, supported them. The directors, it was said, started acting as traders themselves and issued bills without any limits or guarantees for their repayment. The governor, foreseeing the harmful outcomes of this institution, used all his influence against it. He removed executive officers who were part of it and rejected the speaker and thirteen members elected to the council who were also associated with the company. 1740Company shut down.With general chaos expected, a request was made to parliament for a law to shut down the company. This was quickly granted, leading to the company's dissolution, and the bill holders were allowed to take action against its members on an individual basis.[131]

About this time governor Belcher was recalled, and Mr. Shirley was appointed to succeed him. He found the land bank interest predominant in the house, and the treasury empty.

About this time, Governor Belcher was recalled, and Mr. Shirley was appointed to take his place. He found that the land bank interest was dominant in the house, and the treasury was empty.

1741

In this state of things, he deemed it necessary to depart from the letter of his instructions, in order to preserve their spirit. A bill was passed declaring that all contracts should be understood to be payable in silver at six shillings and eight pence the ounce, or in gold at its comparative value. Bills of a new form were issued, purporting to be for ounces of silver, which were to be received in payment of all debts, with this proviso, that if they should depreciate between the time of contract and of payment, a proportional addition should be made to the debt.

In this situation, he felt it was necessary to depart from the exact wording of his instructions to maintain their intent. A law was passed stating that all contracts should be considered payable in silver at six shillings and eight pence per ounce, or in gold at its equivalent value. New bills were issued, claiming to represent ounces of silver, which were to be accepted as payment for all debts, with the condition that if they lost value between the time of the contract and payment, a proportional increase would be applied to the debt.

Affairs of New York.

While these transactions were passing in New England, symptoms of that jealousy which an unsettled boundary must produce between neighbours, began to show themselves in Canada and New York. The geographical situation of these colonies had, at an early period, directed the attention of both towards the commerce of the lakes. Mr. Burnet, the governor both of New York and New Jersey, impressed with the importance of acquiring the command of lake Ontario, had, in the year 1722, erected a trading house at Oswego in the country of the Senecas. This measure excited the jealousy of the French, who launched two vessels on the lake, and transported materials to Niagara for building a large store house, and for repairing the fort at that place. These proceedings were strongly opposed by the Senecas, and by the government of New York. Mr. Burnet remonstrated against them as encroachments on a British province, and also addressed administration on the subject. Complaints were made to the cabinet of Versailles; but the governor of Canada proceeded to complete the fort. To countervail the effects of a measure which he could not prevent, governor Burnet erected a fort at Oswego; soon after the building of which, while Mr. Vandam was governor of New York, the French took possession of Crown Point, which they fortified; and thus acquired the command of lake Champlain. Obviously as this measure was calculated to favour both the offensive and defensive operations of France in America, the English minister, after an unavailing remonstrance, submitted to it.

While these transactions were happening in New England, signs of jealousy that an unsettled boundary causes between neighbors began to emerge in Canada and New York. The geographical situation of these colonies had, at an early stage, directed both of their attention to the commerce of the lakes. Mr. Burnet, the governor of both New York and New Jersey, recognizing the importance of gaining control over Lake Ontario, established a trading post at Oswego in Seneca territory in 1722. This action prompted jealousy from the French, who sent two vessels to the lake and transported materials to Niagara to build a large storehouse and repair the fort there. The Senecas and the government of New York strongly opposed these actions. Mr. Burnet protested against them as violations of a British province and addressed the administration about the issue. Complaints were made to the cabinet in Versailles; however, the governor of Canada continued to complete the fort. To counteract the effects of a move he couldn’t stop, Governor Burnet built a fort at Oswego. Shortly after this construction, while Mr. Vandam was governor of New York, the French took control of Crown Point and fortified it, gaining command over Lake Champlain. It was clear that this action favored both the offensive and defensive capabilities of France in America, and the English minister, after an ineffective protest, accepted it.


CHAPTER IX.

War with the southern Indians.... Dissatisfaction of Carolina with the proprietors.... Rupture with Spain.... Combination to subvert the proprietary government.... Revolution completed.... Expedition from the Havanna against Charleston.... Peace with Spain.... The proprietors surrender their interest to the crown.... The province divided.... Georgia settled.... Impolicy of the first regulations.... Intrigues of the Spaniards with the slaves of South Carolina.... Insurrection of the slaves.

War with the southern Indigenous tribes.... Frustration of Carolina with the proprietors.... Breakdown in relations with Spain.... Coalition to undermine the proprietary government.... Revolution accomplished.... Expedition from Havana against Charleston.... Treaty with Spain.... The proprietors give up their claims to the crown.... The province is divided.... Georgia established.... Poor choices in the initial regulations.... Spanish involvement with the enslaved people of South Carolina.... Slave rebellion.

 

1715

In Carolina, the contests between the inhabitants and the proprietors, added to the favour with which the Queen heard the complaints of the dissenters, had turned the attention of the people towards the crown, and produced a strong desire to substitute the regal, for the proprietary government. This desire was increased by an event which demonstrated the incompetency of their government.

In Carolina, the conflicts between the residents and the proprietors, combined with the support the Queen showed for the complaints of the dissenters, shifted the people's focus toward the crown and created a strong desire to replace the proprietary government with a royal one. This desire was intensified by an event that revealed the shortcomings of their government.

War with the Indians.

The Yamassees, a powerful tribe of Indians on the north east of the Savanna, instigated by the Spaniards at St. Augustine, secretly prepared a general combination of all the southern Indians, against the province. Having massacred the traders settled among them, they advanced in great force against the southern frontier, spreading desolation and slaughter on their route. The inhabitants were driven into Charleston; and governor Craven proclaimed martial law. He also obtained an act of assembly empowering him to impress men; to seize arms, ammunition, and stores; to arm such negroes as could be trusted; and, generally, to prosecute the war with the utmost vigour. Agents were sent to Virginia and to England to solicit assistance, and bills were issued for the payment and subsistence of the army.

The Yamassees, a powerful tribe of Indians in the northeast of the Savanna, were encouraged by the Spaniards in St. Augustine to secretly organize a coalition of all the southern Indians against the province. After killing the traders living among them, they launched a strong attack on the southern frontier, causing destruction and death along their path. The residents fled to Charleston, and Governor Craven declared martial law. He also managed to get an act of assembly that gave him the authority to recruit men, confiscate weapons, ammunition, and supplies, arm trustworthy Black people, and generally wage war with maximum effort. Agents were sent to Virginia and England to seek help, and funds were issued for the payment and support of the army.

At the same time, the Indians entered the northern part of the province, and were within fifty miles of the capital. Thus surrounded by enemies, the governor took the course which was suggested equally by courage and by prudence. Leaving the less active part of the population to find security in the forts at Charleston, he marched with the militia, towards the southern frontier, which was invaded by the strongest body of Indians; and, at a place called Salt Catchers, attacked and totally defeated them. The victors pursued them into their own country, expelled them from it, and drove them over the Savanna river. The fugitives found protection in Florida, where they made a new settlement, from which they continued long afterwards, to make distressing incursions into Carolina.

At the same time, the Native Americans moved into the northern part of the province and were just fifty miles away from the capital. With enemies all around, the governor chose a path that was both brave and sensible. He sent the less active members of the population to seek safety in the forts at Charleston, while he led the militia toward the southern frontier, which was being invaded by the largest group of Native Americans. At a place called Salt Catchers, he launched an attack and completely defeated them. The victors chased them back to their territory, forced them out, and drove them across the Savanna River. The refugees found refuge in Florida, where they established a new settlement, from which they continued to launch troubling incursions into Carolina for many years afterward.

The agent who had been sent by the legislature to England to implore the protection of the proprietors, had received ulterior instructions, should he not succeed with them, to apply directly to the King. Being dissatisfied with his reception by the proprietors, he petitioned the house of commons, who addressed the King, praying his interposition, and immediate assistance to the colony. The King referred the matter to the lords commissioners of trade and plantations, whose report was unfavourable to the application, because the province of Carolina was a proprietary government. They were of opinion that, if the colony was to be protected at the expense of the nation, its government ought to be vested in the crown. On receiving this opinion, the proprietors, in a general meeting, avowed their inability to protect the province, and declared that, unless his majesty would graciously please to interpose, they could foresee nothing but the utter destruction of his faithful subjects in those parts.

The agent sent by the legislature to England to seek the proprietors' protection received additional instructions to approach the King directly if he failed with them. Unhappy with how the proprietors treated him, he submitted a petition to the House of Commons, which then appealed to the King for his intervention and immediate help for the colony. The King passed the matter to the lords commissioners of trade and plantations, whose report was not in favor of the request because the province of Carolina was a proprietary government. They believed that if the colony was to receive protection funded by the nation, its governance should be under the crown. After receiving this opinion, the proprietors held a general meeting where they acknowledged their inability to protect the province and stated that unless the King graciously intervened, they anticipated nothing less than the complete destruction of his loyal subjects in that area.

A government unable to afford protection to the people, was ill adapted to the situation of Carolina.

A government that can't provide protection to its people isn't suited to the circumstances in Carolina.

The dissatisfaction growing out of this cause was still farther augmented by the unpopular, and, in some instances, unwise acts of the proprietors.

The dissatisfaction stemming from this issue was further intensified by the unpopular, and in some cases, unwise actions of the owners.

To relieve the distress produced by war, considerable sums of paper money had been issued; and the proprietors, on the complaint of the merchants, of London engaged in the trade of the province, had given instructions to reduce the quantity in circulation.

To ease the suffering caused by war, large amounts of paper money had been printed; and the owners, responding to the complaints of the London merchants involved in the province's trade, had instructed a reduction of the money in circulation.

1715 to 1717

The assembly had appropriated the country of the Yamassees, to the use of such of his majesty's European subjects, as would settle it. Extracts from the law on this subject being published in England, and in Ireland, five hundred men from the latter kingdom emigrated to Carolina. The proprietors repealed this law; and, to the utter ruin of the emigrants, as well as to the destruction of this barrier against the savages, ordered the lands to be surveyed, and erected into baronies, for themselves.

The assembly had allocated the land of the Yamassees for use by any of his majesty's European subjects who wanted to settle there. After parts of the law were published in England and Ireland, five hundred men from Ireland moved to Carolina. The proprietors canceled this law, which not only ruined the lives of the emigrants but also destroyed the protection against the indigenous tribes, as they ordered the land to be surveyed and divided into baronies for themselves.

While the population was confined to the neighbourhood of Charleston, all the members of the assembly had been elected at that place. As the settlements extended, this practice became inconvenient; and an act was passed, declaring that every parish should choose a certain number of representatives, and that the elections should be held, in each, at the parish church. As if to destroy themselves in the province, the proprietors repealed this popular law also.

While the population was limited to the area around Charleston, all members of the assembly had been elected there. As the settlements grew, this practice became impractical; so an act was passed stating that each parish should elect a specific number of representatives, with elections taking place at the parish church. In an act that seemed aimed at undermining their own authority in the province, the proprietors repealed this popular law as well.

Heavy expenses being still incurred for defence against the inroads of the southern Indians, the people complained loudly of the insufficiency of that government which, unable itself to protect them, prevented the interposition of the crown in their favour.

Heavy expenses were still being spent on defense against the incursions of the southern Indians, and the people loudly complained about the inadequacy of the government, which, unable to protect them, prevented the crown from stepping in to help.

In this temper, governor Johnson, son of the former governor of that name, found the province. He met the assembly with a conciliatory speech, and received an answer expressing great satisfaction at his appointment. His original popularity was increased by the courage he displayed in two expeditions against a formidable band of pirates who had long infested the coast, which he entirely extirpated.

In this mood, Governor Johnson, the son of the previous governor of the same name, found the province. He addressed the assembly with a friendly speech and received a response expressing strong approval of his appointment. His initial popularity grew due to the bravery he showed in two missions against a dangerous group of pirates that had long troubled the coast, which he completely eliminated.

1717

These expeditions occasioned still farther emissions of paper money. The governor, being instructed to diminish its quantity, had influence enough with the assembly to obtain an act for redeeming the bills of credit, in three years, by a tax on lands and negroes. This tax falling heavily on the planters, they sought to elude it by obtaining an act for a farther emission of bills. The proprietors, being informed of this design, and also of an intention to make the produce of the country a tender in payment of all debts, at a fixed value, enjoined the governor not to give his assent to any bill, until it should be laid before them.

These expeditions led to even more paper money being issued. The governor, tasked with reducing its amount, had enough influence with the assembly to pass a law that would redeem the bills of credit in three years through a tax on land and enslaved people. This tax burdens the planters significantly, and they tried to get around it by pushing for another issue of bills. The property owners, hearing about this plan and the intention to make the country's produce a legal payment method for all debts at a set value, instructed the governor not to approve any bill until it had been presented to them.

About the same time, the King, by an order in council, signified his desire to the proprietors, that they would repeal an act passed in Carolina, for imposing a duty of ten per centum on all goods of British manufacture imported into the province. The repeal of this act, and of one declaring the right of the assembly to name a receiver of the public money, and of the election law, were transmitted to the governor, in a letter directing him to dissolve the assembly, and to hold a new election at Charleston, according to ancient usage.

Around the same time, the King, through a council order, expressed his wish to the proprietors that they would repeal a law passed in Carolina that imposed a ten percent duty on all goods of British manufacture imported into the province. The repeal of this law, along with one stating the assembly's right to appoint a receiver of public money and the election law, was sent to the governor in a letter instructing him to dissolve the assembly and hold a new election in Charleston, following traditional practices.

1718

The assembly being employed in devising means for raising revenue, their dissolution was deferred; but the repeal of the law imposing duties, and the royal displeasure at the clause laying a duty on British manufactures, were immediately communicated, with a recommendation to pass another act, omitting that clause.

The assembly, working on ways to raise revenue, had their dissolution postponed; however, the repeal of the law imposing duties and the king's displeasure with the clause that placed a duty on British products were quickly conveyed, along with a suggestion to pass a new act that removed that clause.

Meanwhile the governor's instructions were divulged. They excited great irritation; and produced a warm debate on the right of the proprietors to repeal a law enacted with the consent of their deputy in the province.

Meanwhile, the governor's instructions were revealed. They caused a lot of irritation and sparked a heated debate about the owners' right to overturn a law that was passed with the approval of their representative in the province.

About this time, chief justice Trott, who had become extremely unpopular in the colony, was charged with many iniquitous proceedings; and the governor, the major part of the council, and the assembly, united in a memorial representing his malpractices to the proprietors. 1719Mr. Young was deputed their agent to enforce these complaints.

About this time, Chief Justice Trott, who had become very unpopular in the colony, was accused of many wrongful actions; and the governor, most of the council, and the assembly came together in a petition detailing his misdeeds to the proprietors. 1719 Mr. Young was appointed their agent to address these complaints.

Soon after his arrival in London, he presented a memorial to the proprietors, detailing the proceedings of Carolina, and stating the objections of the assembly to the right of their lordships to repeal laws, which had been approved by their deputies.

Soon after he arrived in London, he submitted a formal request to the owners, outlining the situation in Carolina and expressing the assembly's objections to their lordships' authority to overturn laws that had been approved by their representatives.

This memorial was very unfavourably received, and the members of the council who had subscribed it, were displaced. The proprietors asserted their right to repeal all laws passed in the province, approved the conduct of the chief justice, censured that of the governor in disobeying their instructions respecting the dissolution of the assembly, and repeated their orders on this subject.

This memorial was received very poorly, and the council members who supported it were removed from their positions. The owners claimed their right to overturn all laws made in the province, backed the actions of the chief justice, criticized the governor for ignoring their instructions about dissolving the assembly, and reiterated their orders regarding this issue.

However the governor might disapprove the instructions given him, he did not hesitate to obey them. The new council was summoned, the assembly was dissolved, and writs were issued for electing another at Charleston.

However the governor might disagree with the instructions given to him, he did not hesitate to follow them. The new council was called, the assembly was dissolved, and writs were issued for electing another one in Charleston.

The public mind had been gradually prepared for a revolution, and these irritating measures completed the disgust with which the people viewed the government of the proprietors. An opportunity to make the change so generally desired was soon afforded. War with Spain.A rupture having taken place between Great Britain and Spain, advice was received from England of a plan formed in the Havanna for the invasion of Carolina. The governor convened the council, and such members of the assembly as were in town, and laid his intelligence before them. He, at the same time, stated the ruinous condition of the fortifications, and proposed that a sum for repairing them should be raised, by voluntary subscription, of which he set the example by a liberal donation.

The public was gradually getting ready for a revolution, and these irritating measures finished off the people's frustration with the owners' government. A chance to make the long-desired change soon came up. War with Spain. After a conflict broke out between Great Britain and Spain, England sent word about a plan in Havana to invade Carolina. The governor gathered the council and the members of the assembly that were in town and shared this information with them. He also mentioned the terrible state of the fortifications and suggested raising money for their repairs through voluntary donations, to which he contributed generously.

The assembly declared a subscription to be unnecessary, as the duties would afford an ample fund for the object. The repeal of the law imposing them was said to be utterly void, and would be disregarded.

The assembly stated that a subscription was unnecessary since the duties would provide enough funding for the purpose. It was claimed that the repeal of the law imposing them was completely invalid and would be ignored.

Combination to subvert the government.

The members of the new assembly, though they had not been regularly convened at Charleston, had held several private meetings in the country to concert measures of future resistance. They had drawn up an association for uniting the whole province in opposition to the proprietary government, which was proposed to the militia at their public meetings, and subscribed almost unanimously. This confederacy was formed with such secrecy and dispatch, that, before the governor was informed of it, almost every inhabitant of the province was engaged in it.

The members of the new assembly, although they hadn't officially met in Charleston, had held several private gatherings in the countryside to plan future resistance. They created an agreement to unite the entire province against the proprietary government, which was presented to the militia at their public meetings and was almost unanimously agreed upon. This alliance was formed with such secrecy and speed that, before the governor was aware of it, nearly every resident of the province was involved.

The members of the assembly, thus supported by the people, resolved to subvert the power of the proprietors.

The assembly members, backed by the people, decided to overthrow the power of the owners.

The governor, who resided in the country, had no intimation of these secret meetings and transactions, until he received a letter from a committee of the representatives of the people, offering him the government of the province under the King; it having been determined to submit no longer to that of the proprietors.

The governor, who lived in the countryside, had no idea about these secret meetings and dealings until he got a letter from a committee representing the people, offering him the governorship of the province under the King; they had decided they would no longer accept rule from the proprietors.

Mr. Johnson resolved to suppress this spirit of revolt, and hastened to town in order to lay the letter before his council. They advised him to take no notice of it, until the legislature should be regularly convened. On meeting, the assembly declared, "that the laws, pretended to be repealed, continued to be in force; and that no power, other than the general assembly, could repeal them: That the writs under which they were elected were void, inasmuch as they had been issued by advice of an unconstitutional council: That the representatives cannot, therefore, act as an assembly, but as a convention delegated by the people to prevent the utter ruin of the government: And, lastly, that the lords proprietors had unhinged the frame of the government, and forfeited their right thereto; and that an address be prepared to desire the honourable Robert Johnson, the present governor, to take on himself the government of the province in the name of the King." The address was signed by Arthur Middleton, as president of the convention, and by twenty-two members.

Mr. Johnson decided to put an end to this spirit of rebellion and hurried to town to present the letter to his council. They advised him to ignore it until the legislature could be officially convened. When they met, the assembly declared, "the laws that are claimed to be repealed are still in effect; and only the general assembly has the authority to repeal them: That the writs under which they were elected are invalid, as they were issued with the advice of an unconstitutional council: That the representatives cannot act as an assembly, but as a convention chosen by the people to prevent the total collapse of the government: And, finally, that the lords proprietors have disrupted the government structure and forfeited their rights to it; and that an address be drafted to request the honorable Robert Johnson, the current governor, to assume control of the province in the name of the King." The address was signed by Arthur Middleton, as president of the convention, and by twenty-two members.

After several unavailing efforts, on the part of the assembly, to induce Mr. Johnson to accept the government under the King; and, on his part, to reinstate the government of the proprietors; he issued a proclamation dissolving the assembly, and retired into the country.

After several unsuccessful attempts by the assembly to persuade Mr. Johnson to accept the government under the King, and his attempts to restore the government of the proprietors, he issued a proclamation dissolving the assembly and withdrew to the countryside.

The proclamation was torn from the hands of the officer, and the assembly elected colonel James Moore chief magistrate of the colony.

The proclamation was ripped from the officer's hands, and the assembly elected Colonel James Moore as the chief magistrate of the colony.

Revolution completed.

After proclaiming him in the name of the King, and electing a council, the legislature published a declaration stating the revolution that had taken place, with the causes which produced it; and then proceeded, deliberately to manage the affairs of the province.

After declaring him in the name of the King and choosing a council, the legislature issued a statement outlining the revolution that had occurred and the reasons behind it; they then set about managing the province's affairs with careful consideration.

While Carolina was effecting this revolution, the agent of the colony obtained a hearing before the lords of the regency and council in England, (the King being then in Hanover) who were of opinion that the proprietors had forfeited their charter. They ordered the attorney general to take out a scire facias against it, and appointed Francis Nicholson provisional governor of the province under the King. He was received with universal joy; and the people of Carolina passed, with great satisfaction, from the proprietary government to the immediate dominion of the crown. The proprietors surrender to the crown.This revolution was completed by an agreement between the crown and seven of the proprietors, whereby, for the sum of seventeen thousand five hundred pounds sterling, they surrendered their right and interest both in the government and soil. This agreement was confirmed by an act of parliament; soon after which John Lord Carteret, the remaining proprietor, also surrendered all his interest in the government, but retained his rights of property.[132]

While Carolina was going through this change, the colony's representative had a meeting with the regency lords and council in England (since the King was in Hanover at the time), who believed that the proprietors had lost their charter. They instructed the attorney general to initiate a scire facias against it and appointed Francis Nicholson as the provisional governor of the province under the King. He was welcomed with widespread joy, and the people of Carolina happily transitioned from the proprietary government to direct control by the crown. The owners give up their rights to the crown.This change was finalized through an agreement between the crown and seven of the proprietors, who, in exchange for seventeen thousand five hundred pounds sterling, gave up their rights and interest in both the government and the land. This agreement was officially validated by an act of parliament; shortly afterward, John Lord Carteret, the last remaining proprietor, also relinquished all his interest in the government but kept his property rights.[132]

1721

Carolina received with joy the same form of government which had been bestowed on her sister colonies. The people pleased with their situation, and secure of protection, turned their attention to domestic and agricultural pursuits; and the face of the country soon evidenced the happy effects which result from contented industry, directed by those who are to receive its fruits. 1732The province divided.For the convenience of the inhabitants, the province was divided; and was, thenceforward, distinguished by the names of North and South Carolina.[133]

Carolina welcomed with joy the same type of government that had been given to her sister colonies. The people, happy with their situation and secure in their protection, focused on domestic and agricultural activities. The landscape of the region soon showed the positive outcomes that come from diligent work overseen by those who will benefit from it. 1732The province split.To make things easier for the residents, the province was divided and from then on was known as North and South Carolina.[133]

About this period, the settlement of a new colony was planned in England. The tract of country lying between the rivers Savanna and Alatamaha being unoccupied by Europeans, a company was formed for the humane purpose of transplanting into this wilderness, the suffering poor of the mother country. This territory, now denominated Georgia, was granted to the company; and a corporation, consisting of twenty-one persons, was created under the name of "trustees for settling and establishing the colony of Georgia." Large sums of money were subscribed for transporting, and furnishing with necessaries, such poor people as should be willing to pass the Atlantic, and to seek the means of subsistence in a new world. One hundred and sixteen persons embarked at Gravesend, under the conduct of Mr. James Oglethorpe, one of the trustees, who, after landing at Charleston, proceeded to the tract of country allotted for the new colony, and laid the foundation of the town of Savanna, on the river which bears that name. Georgia settled.A small fort was erected on its bank, in which some guns were mounted; and a treaty was held with the Creek Indians, from whom the cession of a considerable tract was obtained.

About this time, a new colony was being planned in England. The area between the Savanna and Alatamaha rivers was unoccupied by Europeans, so a group was formed with the compassionate goal of relocating the struggling poor from the mother country into this wilderness. This land, now known as Georgia, was granted to the group, and a corporation made up of twenty-one people was established under the name "trustees for settling and establishing the colony of Georgia." Significant amounts of money were raised to transport and provide essential supplies for those poor individuals willing to cross the Atlantic and seek a new life in a new world. One hundred and sixteen people set sail from Gravesend, led by Mr. James Oglethorpe, one of the trustees. After landing in Charleston, they moved to the area designated for the new colony and established the town of Savanna, located on the river of the same name. Georgia has settled. A small fort was built on its bank, with some cannons set up, and a treaty was made with the Creek Indians, securing the cession of a significant area of land.

The trustees continued to make great efforts for the accomplishment of their object, and settled several companies of emigrants in Georgia. Unfortunately, the wisdom of their regulations did not equal the humanity of their motives. Totally unacquainted with the country they were to govern, they devised a system for it, rather calculated to impede than to promote its population.

The trustees kept working hard to achieve their goal and settled several groups of immigrants in Georgia. Unfortunately, the quality of their regulations didn’t match the kindness of their intentions. Completely unfamiliar with the area they were meant to manage, they created a system that was more likely to hinder rather than support its growth.

1733

Considering each male inhabitant both as a soldier and a planter, to be provided with arms and ammunition for defence as well as with utensils for cultivation, they adopted the pernicious resolution of introducing such tenures for holding lands as were most favourable to a military establishment. Impolicy of the first regulation.Each tract granted, was considered as a military fief, for which the possessor was to appear in arms, and take the field, when required for the public defence. The grants were in tail male; and, on the termination of the estate, the lands were to revert to the trust, to be re-granted to such persons as would most benefit the colony. Any lands which should not be enclosed, cleared, and cultivated, within eighteen years, reverted to the trust. The importation of negroes, and of rum, was prohibited; and those only were allowed to trade with the Indians, to whom a license should be given.

Considering each male resident as both a soldier and a farmer, they decided to provide them with weapons and ammunition for defense as well as tools for farming. They made the harmful choice to establish land tenures that favored a military structure. First regulation's impoliteness. Each piece of land granted was seen as a military fief, requiring the owner to be armed and ready to serve in defense of the community when needed. The grants were for tail male; and when the estate ended, the lands would go back to the trust to be re-granted to those who would best benefit the colony. Any land that wasn’t enclosed, cleared, and cultivated within eighteen years would revert to the trust. The importation of enslaved people and rum was banned, and only those who were given a license could trade with the Indigenous peoples.

However specious the arguments in support of these regulations might appear to the trustees, human ingenuity could scarcely have devised a system better calculated to defeat their hopes.

However plausible the arguments for these regulations may seem to the trustees, human creativity could hardly have come up with a system better designed to undermine their hopes.

The tenure of lands drove the settlers into Carolina where that property might be acquired in fee simple. The prohibition of slavery rendered the task of opening the country, too heavy to be successfully undertaken in that burning climate; and the restriction on their trade to the West Indies, deprived them of the only market for lumber, an article in which they abounded.

The ownership of land pushed the settlers to Carolina where they could obtain property outright. The ban on slavery made it too difficult to develop the area in that harsh climate, and the limitation on trading with the West Indies left them without a market for lumber, which they had in abundance.

1734

Mr. Oglethorpe's first employment was the construction of fortifications for defence. He erected one fort on the Savanna, at Augusta, and another on an island of the Alatamaha, called Frederica, for defence against the Indians and the inhabitants of Florida. The Spaniards remonstrated against them; and a commissioner from the Havanna insisted on the evacuation of the country to the thirty-third degree of north latitude, which he claimed in the name of the King of Spain; but this remonstrance and claim were equally disregarded.

Mr. Oglethorpe's first job was building fortifications for defense. He constructed one fort on the Savannah, at Augusta, and another on an island in the Altamaha River, called Frederica, to protect against the Native Americans and the people of Florida. The Spaniards protested against these constructions, and a commissioner from Havana demanded the evacuation of the area up to the thirty-third degree of north latitude, which he claimed for the King of Spain; however, this protest and claim were both ignored.

The restrictions imposed by the trustees, on the inhabitants of Georgia, were too oppressive to be endured in silence. They remonstrated, particularly, against the tenure by which their lands were held, and against the prohibition of the introduction of slaves. These complaints, the result of experience, were addressed to persons ignorant of the condition of the petitioners, and were neglected. The colony languished; while South Carolina, not unlike Georgia both in soil and climate, advanced with considerable rapidity. Although emigration was encouraged by paying the passage money of the emigrants, by furnishing them with clothes, arms, ammunition, and implements of husbandry, by maintaining their families for the first year, and, in some instances, by furnishing them with stock; yet the unwise policy, which has been mentioned, more than counterbalanced these advantages; and for ten years, during which time the exports from Carolina more than doubled, the settlers in Georgia could, with difficulty, obtain a scanty subsistence.

The restrictions imposed by the trustees on the people of Georgia were too oppressive to be silently endured. They protested, in particular, against how their land was held and the ban on bringing in slaves. These complaints, stemming from their experiences, were sent to people who knew nothing about the petitioners' situation and were ignored. The colony struggled while South Carolina, which was similar to Georgia in soil and climate, progressed rapidly. Even though immigration was encouraged by covering the cost of passage, providing them with clothes, weapons, ammunition, tools for farming, supporting their families for the first year, and sometimes giving them livestock, the misguided policies mentioned earlier overwhelmed these benefits. For ten years, as exports from Carolina more than doubled, the settlers in Georgia barely managed to make a living.

1737

The differences between Great Britain and Spain not admitting of adjustment, both nations prepared for war. The Spaniards strengthened East Florida; and the British government ordered a regiment, consisting of six hundred effective men, into Georgia. The command of the troops, both of Georgia and Carolina, was given to major general Oglethorpe, who fixed his headquarters at Frederica.

The differences between Great Britain and Spain couldn’t be resolved, so both countries got ready for war. The Spanish reinforced East Florida, and the British government sent a regiment of six hundred active soldiers to Georgia. Major General Oglethorpe was put in charge of the troops in both Georgia and Carolina, setting up his headquarters at Frederica.

Before hostilities had commenced, the Spaniards at St. Augustine engaged in criminal intrigues among the blacks of Carolina. Agents had been secretly employed in seducing the slaves of that province to escape to St. Augustine, where liberty was promised them, and where they were formed into a regiment officered by themselves. Hitherto these practices had been attended only with the loss of property; but, about this time, the evil assumed a much more alarming form. Insurrection of the slaves.A large number of slaves assembled at Stono, where they forced a warehouse containing arms and ammunition, murdered the whites in possession of it, and, after choosing a captain, directed their march south westward, with drums beating and colours flying. On their march, they massacred the whites, seized all the arms they could find, and forced such blacks as did not voluntarily join them, to follow their party. Intoxicated with ardent spirits, and with their short lived success, they considered their work as already achieved, and halted in an open field, where the time which might have been employed in promoting their design, was devoted to dancing and exultation. Fortunately, the people of the neighbourhood had assembled on the same day, to attend divine service; and, as was then directed by law, all the men came armed. They marched immediately against the blacks, whom they completely surprised. Many were killed, and the residue dispersed or taken. Thus the insurrection was suppressed on the day of its commencement; and such of its leaders as survived the battle were immediately executed.

Before the fighting started, the Spaniards in St. Augustine were involved in shady dealings with the black population of Carolina. They secretly hired agents to entice the slaves of that region to escape to St. Augustine, where they promised them freedom and formed them into a regiment led by their own officers. Until then, these actions had only led to the loss of property; however, at this time, the situation became much more serious. Slave uprising.A large group of slaves gathered at Stono, where they broke into a warehouse filled with arms and ammunition, killed the white people inside, and after choosing a captain, headed southwest with drums beating and flags flying. On their way, they killed more white people, grabbed all the weapons they could find, and forced other blacks who didn’t want to join them to go along. Fueled by strong drinks and their fleeting success, they believed they had already won and stopped in an open field to dance and celebrate. Luckily, local residents had gathered that same day for church services, and, as required by law, all the men were armed. They quickly marched against the slaves, catching them by surprise. Many were killed, and the rest scattered or were captured. Thus, the uprising was crushed on the very day it began, and those leaders who survived the battle were executed immediately.

During the long repose, which the pacific temper of the duke of Orleans, Regent of France during the minority of Louis XV. and the equally pacific temper of sir Robert Walpole, minister of England, gave to their respective countries, the British colonies in America had increased rapidly in population and in wealth. Lands were cheap, and subsistence easily acquired. From New York to Virginia inclusive, no enemy existed to restrain new settlements, and no fears of inability to maintain a family, checked the natural propensity to early marriages. The people were employed in cultivating the earth, and in spreading themselves over the vast regions which were open to them; and, during this period, their history furnishes none of those remarkable events which interest posterity.

During the long peace, which the calm nature of the Duke of Orleans, Regent of France during the minority of Louis XV, and the equally calm nature of Sir Robert Walpole, minister of England, brought to their respective countries, the British colonies in America grew rapidly in population and wealth. Land was inexpensive, and it was easy to make a living. From New York to Virginia, there were no enemies to hinder new settlements, and there were no worries about being unable to support a family, which encouraged early marriages. The people focused on farming and expanding into the vast territories available to them; during this time, their history doesn’t have any of those significant events that capture the attention of future generations.


CHAPTER X.

War declared against Spain.... Expedition against St. Augustine.... Georgia invaded.... Spaniards land on an island in the Alatamaha.... Appearance of a fleet from Charleston.... Spanish army re-embarks.... Hostilities with France.... Expedition against Louisbourg.... Louisbourg surrenders.... Great plans of the belligerent powers.... Misfortunes of the armament under the duke D'Anville.... The French fleet dispersed by a storm.... Expedition against Nova Scotia.... Treaty of Aix la Chapelle.... Paper money of Massachusetts redeemed.... Contests between the French and English respecting boundaries.... Statement respecting the discovery of the Mississippi.... Scheme for connecting Louisiana with Canada.... Relative strength of the French and English colonies.... Defeat at the Little Meadows.... Convention at Albany.... Plan of union.... Objected to both in America and Great Britain.

War was declared against Spain.... An expedition was launched against St. Augustine.... Georgia was invaded.... Spaniards landed on an island in the Altamaha.... A fleet appeared from Charleston.... The Spanish army re-embarked.... There were hostilities with France.... An expedition was sent against Louisbourg.... Louisbourg surrendered.... The warring powers had grand plans.... The armament led by the Duke D'Anville faced misfortunes.... A storm scattered the French fleet.... An expedition was launched against Nova Scotia.... The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle was established.... Massachusetts redeemed its paper money.... There were disputes between the French and English over boundaries.... A statement was made regarding the discovery of the Mississippi.... There was a scheme to connect Louisiana with Canada.... The relative strength of the French and English colonies was assessed.... There was a defeat at the Little Meadows.... A convention was held in Albany.... A plan for union was proposed.... It was opposed both in America and Great Britain.

 

1739
War with Spain.

The increasing complaints of the merchants, and the loud clamours of the nation, at length forced the minister to abandon his pacific system; and war was declared against Spain. A squadron commanded by admiral Vernon was detached to the West Indies, with instructions to act offensively; and general Oglethorpe was ordered to annoy the settlements in Florida. He planned an expedition against St. Augustine, and requested the assistance of South Carolina. That colony, ardently desiring the expulsion of neighbours alike feared and hated, entered zealously into the views of the general, and agreed to furnish the men and money he requested. A regiment, commanded by colonel Vanderdussen, was immediately raised in Virginia and the two Carolinas. A body of Indians was also engaged, and captain Price, who commanded the small fleet on that station, promised his co-operation. These arrangements being made, and the mouth of St. John's river, on the coast of Florida, being appointed as the place, of rendezvous general Oglethorpe hastened to Georgia, to prepare his regiment for the expedition.

The rising complaints from merchants and the loud outcry from the nation finally forced the minister to give up his peaceful approach; war was declared against Spain. A squadron led by Admiral Vernon was sent to the West Indies with orders to take offensive action, and General Oglethorpe was instructed to disrupt the settlements in Florida. He planned an attack on St. Augustine and asked for help from South Carolina. That colony, eager to remove their feared and hated neighbors, enthusiastically supported the general's plans and agreed to provide the men and funds he needed. A regiment, led by Colonel Vanderdussen, was quickly formed in Virginia and the two Carolinas. A group of Indians was also involved, and Captain Price, who was in charge of the small fleet in that area, promised his support. With these plans in place, and the mouth of St. John's River on the Florida coast designated as the meeting point, General Oglethorpe rushed to Georgia to prepare his regiment for the mission.

1740

Those unexpected impediments, which always embarrass military movements conducted by men without experience, having delayed the arrival of his northern troops, Oglethorpe entered Florida at the head of his own regiment, aided by a party of Indians; and invested Diego, a small fort about twenty-five miles from St. Augustine, which capitulated after a short resistance. He then returned to the place of rendezvous, where he was joined by colonel Vanderdussen, and by a company of Highlanders under the command of captain M'Intosh; a few days after which, he marched with his whole force, consisting of about two thousand men, to fort Moosa, in the neighbourhood of St. Augustine, which was evacuated on his approach. The general now perceived that the enterprise would be attended with more difficulty than had been anticipated. In the time which intervened between his entering Florida and appearing before the town, supplies of provisions had been received from the country, and six Spanish half gallies carrying long brass nine pounders, and two sloops laden with provisions, had entered the harbour. Finding the place better fortified than had been expected, he determined to invest it completely, and to advance by regular approaches. In execution of this plan, colonel Palmer, with ninety-five Highlanders, and forty-two Indians, remained at fort Moosa, while the army took different positions near the town, and began an ineffectual bombardment from the island of Anastasia. The general was deliberating on a plan for forcing the harbour and taking a nearer position, when colonel Palmer was surprised, and his detachment cut to pieces. At the same time some small vessels from the Havanna, with a reinforcement of men and supply of provisions, entered the harbour through the narrow channel of the Matanzas.

Those unexpected obstacles, which always complicate military actions led by inexperienced men, delayed the arrival of his northern troops. Oglethorpe entered Florida at the head of his own regiment, supported by a group of Indians, and laid siege to Diego, a small fort about twenty-five miles from St. Augustine, which surrendered after a brief resistance. He then went back to the meeting point, where he was joined by Colonel Vanderdussen and a company of Highlanders led by Captain M'Intosh. A few days later, he marched with his entire force, consisting of around two thousand men, to Fort Moosa, near St. Augustine, which was abandoned as he approached. The general soon realized that the mission would be more challenging than he had expected. In the time between his entry into Florida and his arrival before the town, supplies of food had come in from the area, and six Spanish half-galleys carrying long brass nine-pounders, along with two sloops loaded with provisions, had entered the harbor. Finding the place better fortified than anticipated, he decided to completely surround it and advance methodically. To carry out this plan, Colonel Palmer, with ninety-five Highlanders and forty-two Indians, stayed at Fort Moosa while the army took various positions near the town and started an ineffective bombardment from Anastasia Island. The general was considering a plan to force the harbor and take a closer position when Colonel Palmer was ambushed, and his unit was decimated. At the same time, some small ships from Havana arrived in the harbor with reinforcements and supplies.

The army began to despair of success; and the provincials, enfeebled by the heat, dispirited by sickness, and fatigued by fruitless efforts, marched away in large bodies. The navy being ill supplied with provisions, and the season for hurricanes approaching, captain Price was unwilling to hazard his majesty's ships on that coast. The general, labouring under a fever, finding his regiment, as well as himself, worn out with fatigue, and rendered unfit for action by disease; reluctantly abandoned the enterprise, and returned to Frederica.

The army started to lose hope for success, and the local troops, weakened by the heat, discouraged by illness, and exhausted from pointless efforts, left in large groups. The navy was low on supplies, and with hurricane season near, Captain Price didn’t want to risk His Majesty's ships on that coast. The general, suffering from a fever and seeing that his regiment, along with himself, was too worn out and unfit for action due to illness, reluctantly gave up the mission and returned to Frederica.

The colonists, disappointed and chagrined by the failure of the expedition, attributed this misfortune entirely to the incapacity of the general, who was not less dissatisfied with them. Whatever may have been the true causes of the failure, it produced a mutual and injurious distrust between the general and the colonists.[134]

The colonists, frustrated and upset by the expedition's failure, blamed this misfortune entirely on the general's incompetence, who was equally displeased with them. Regardless of the actual reasons for the failure, it created a damaging mutual distrust between the general and the colonists.[134]

1742

The events of the war soon disclosed the dangers resulting from this want of confidence in general Oglethorpe, and, still more, from the want of power to produce a co-operation of the common force for the common defence.

The events of the war quickly revealed the dangers that came from the lack of confidence in General Oglethorpe, and even more so, from the inability to create a united effort for collective defense.

Spain had ever considered the settlement of Georgia as an encroachment on her territory, and had cherished the intention to seize every proper occasion to dislodge the English by force. With this view, an armament consisting of two thousand men, commanded by Don Antonio di Ridondo, embarked at the Havanna, under convoy of a strong squadron, and arrived at St. Augustine in May. The fleet having been seen on its passage, notice of its approach was given to general Oglethorpe, who communicated the intelligence to governor Glenn of South Carolina, and urged the necessity of sending the troops of that province to his assistance.

Spain had always seen the settlement of Georgia as an invasion of its territory and had intended to use any suitable opportunity to force the English out. With this goal in mind, a military force of two thousand men, led by Don Antonio di Ridondo, set sail from Havana, protected by a strong squadron, and arrived at St. Augustine in May. When the fleet was spotted en route, General Oglethorpe was notified, and he informed Governor Glenn of South Carolina, stressing the need for the troops from that province to come to his aid.

Georgia being a barrier for South Carolina, the policy of meeting an invading army on the frontiers of the former, especially one containing several companies composed of negroes who had fled from the latter, was too obvious not to be perceived: yet either from prejudice against Oglethorpe, or the disposition inherent in separate governments to preserve their own force for their own defence, Carolina refused to give that general any assistance. Its attention was directed entirely to the defence of Charleston; and the inhabitants of its southern frontier, instead of marching to the camp of Oglethorpe, fled to that city for safety. In the mean time, the general collected a few Highlanders, and rangers of Georgia, together with as many Indian warriors as would join him, and determined to defend Frederica.

Georgia acted as a barrier for South Carolina, and the strategy of meeting an invading army at the borders of Georgia, especially one with several companies of escaped slaves from South Carolina, was too clear to ignore. However, due to prejudice against Oglethorpe or the natural tendency of separate governments to prioritize their own defense, South Carolina refused to support him. Their focus was solely on defending Charleston, and the residents of the southern frontier, instead of heading to Oglethorpe's camp, sought refuge in the city. Meanwhile, Oglethorpe gathered a small group of Highlanders and Georgia rangers, along with any Indian warriors willing to join him, and resolved to defend Frederica.

Georgia invaded.

Late in June, the Spanish fleet, consisting of thirty-two sail, carrying above three thousand men, crossed Simon's bar into Jekyl sound, and passing Simon's fort, then occupied by general Oglethorpe, proceeded up the Alatamaha, out of the reach of his guns; after which, the troops landed on the island, and erected a battery of twenty eighteen pounders.

Late in June, the Spanish fleet, made up of thirty-two ships and carrying more than three thousand men, crossed Simon's bar into Jekyl Sound. After passing Simon's fort, which was then held by General Oglethorpe, they moved up the Alatamaha River, out of range of his cannons. The troops then landed on the island and set up a battery of twenty 18-pound cannons.

Fort Simon's being indefensible, Oglethorpe retreated to Frederica. His whole force, exclusive of Indians, amounted to little more than seven hundred men, a force which could only enable him to act on the defensive until the arrival of reinforcements which he still expected from South Carolina. The face of the country was peculiarly favorable to this system of operations. Its thick woods and deep morasses opposed great obstacles to the advance of an invading enemy, not well acquainted with the paths which passed through them. Oglethorpe turned these advantages to the best account. In an attempt made by the Spanish general to pierce these woods in order to reach Frederica, several sharp rencounters took place; in one of which he lost a captain and two lieutenants killed, and above one hundred privates taken prisoners. He then changed his plan of operations; and, abandoning his intention of forcing his way to Frederica by land, called in his parties, kept his men under cover of his cannon, and detached some vessels up the river, with a body of troops on board, to reconnoitre the fort, and draw the attention of the English to that quarter.

Fort Simon was undefendable, so Oglethorpe fell back to Frederica. His entire force, not including the Indians, numbered just over seven hundred men, which meant he could only defend himself until reinforcements he was still expecting from South Carolina arrived. The landscape was particularly suited for this type of operation. The dense woods and deep swamps presented significant challenges for an invading enemy that wasn't familiar with the paths through them. Oglethorpe made the most of these advantages. When the Spanish general tried to push through these woods to reach Frederica, there were several intense skirmishes; in one, he lost a captain and two lieutenants killed and over a hundred privates taken prisoner. He then changed his strategy, abandoning his plan to fight his way to Frederica by land. Instead, he called back his units, kept his men hidden behind his cannons, and sent some ships up the river with troops on board to scout the fort and divert the English's attention to that area.

About this time, an English prisoner escaped from the Spaniards, and informed general Oglethorpe that a difference existed between the troops from Cuba, and those from St. Augustine, which had been carried so far that they encamped in separate places. This intelligence suggested the idea of attacking them while divided; and his perfect knowledge of the woods favoured the hope of surprising one of their encampments. In execution of this design, he drew out the flower of his army, and marched in the night, unobserved, within two miles of the Spanish camp. There, his troops halted, and he advanced, himself, at the head of a select corps, to reconnoitre the situation of the enemy. While he was using the utmost circumspection to obtain the necessary information without being discovered, a French soldier of his party discharged his musket, and ran into the Spanish lines. Discovery defeating every hope of success, the general retreated to Frederica.

Around this time, an English prisoner managed to escape from the Spaniards and told General Oglethorpe that there was a split between the troops from Cuba and those from St. Augustine, to the point where they were camping in separate areas. This information sparked the idea of attacking them while they were divided, and his deep knowledge of the woods boosted the chances of surprising one of their camps. To carry out this plan, he selected the best of his army and marched at night, going unnoticed until he was just two miles from the Spanish camp. There, his troops paused, and he moved forward himself with a special group to scout out the enemy's position. While he was being extremely cautious to gather the needed information without being seen, a French soldier from his team fired his musket and ran into the Spanish lines. With discovery ruining any chance of success, the general retreated to Frederica.

Oglethorpe, confident that the deserter would disclose his weakness, devised an expedient which turned the event to advantage. He wrote to the deserter as if in concert with him, directing him to give the Spanish general such information as might induce him to attack Frederica; hinting also at an attempt meditated by admiral Vernon on St. Augustine, and at late advices from Carolina, giving assurances of a reinforcement of two thousand men. He then tampered with one of the Spanish prisoners, who, for a small bribe, promised to deliver this letter to the deserter, after which, he was permitted to escape. The prisoner, as was foreseen delivered the letter to his general, who ordered the deserter to be put in irons; and, was, in no small degree, embarrassed to determine whether the letter ought to be considered as a stratagem to save Frederica, and induce the abandonment of the enterprise; or as real instructions to direct the conduct of a spy. While hesitating on the course to be pursued, his doubts were removed by one of those incidents, which have so much influence on human affairs.

Oglethorpe, sure that the deserter would reveal his weakness, came up with a clever plan that turned the situation to his advantage. He wrote to the deserter as if they were working together, instructing him to provide the Spanish general with information that might prompt an attack on Frederica; he also hinted at a planned move by Admiral Vernon on St. Augustine, sharing recent updates from Carolina that promised a reinforcement of two thousand men. He then bribed one of the Spanish prisoners, who agreed to deliver this letter to the deserter, after which he was allowed to escape. The prisoner, as expected, delivered the letter to his general, who ordered the deserter to be put in chains; he was quite troubled about whether to see the letter as a trick to protect Frederica and discourage the attack or as genuine instructions to guide the actions of a spy. While he hesitated on what to do, his uncertainty was resolved by one of those events that have such a significant impact on human affairs.

The assembly of South Carolina had voted a supply of money to general Oglethorpe; and the governor had ordered some ships of force to his aid. These appeared off the coast while the principal officers of the Spanish army were yet deliberating on the letter. They deliberated no longer. Spanish army re-embarks in confusion.The whole army was seized with a panic; and, after setting fire to the fort, embarked in great hurry and confusion, leaving behind several pieces of heavy artillery, and a large quantity of provisions and military stores.

The South Carolina assembly approved funds for General Oglethorpe, and the governor dispatched some warships to assist him. These ships arrived off the coast while the top officers of the Spanish army were still discussing the letter. They didn't take long to decide. Spanish army departs in confusion.The entire army was hit with panic; after setting fire to the fort, they hastily boarded their ships, leaving behind several heavy cannons, a large amount of food, and military supplies.

Thus was Georgia delivered from an invasion which threatened the total subjugation of the province.

Thus, Georgia was saved from an invasion that threatened to completely conquer the province.

The ill success of these reciprocal attempts at conquest, seems to have discouraged both parties; and the Spanish and English colonies, in the neighbourhood of each other, contented themselves, for the residue of the war, with guarding their own frontiers.

The lack of success in these mutual attempts at conquest seems to have disheartened both sides; and the Spanish and English colonies, located near each other, focused for the rest of the war on protecting their own borders.

The connexion between the branches of the house of Bourbon was too intimate for the preservation of peace with France, during the prosecution of war against Spain. Both nations expected and prepared for hostilities. War had commenced in fact, though not in form, on the continent of Europe; but as they carried on their military operations as auxiliaries, in support of the contending claims of the elector of Bavaria, and the queen of Hungary, to the imperial throne, they preserved in America a suspicious and jealous suspension of hostility, rather than a real peace.

The connection between the branches of the Bourbon family was too close for peace with France to hold while they were at war with Spain. Both countries anticipated and were ready for conflict. War had essentially started in Europe, even if it wasn’t officially declared; however, as they conducted their military actions as allies supporting the rival claims of the elector of Bavaria and the queen of Hungary to the imperial crown, they maintained a wary and tense pause in hostilities in America instead of a true peace.

1744

This state of things was interrupted by a sudden incursion of the French into Nova Scotia.

This situation was interrupted by a sudden invasion of the French into Nova Scotia.

Hostilities with France.

The governor of Cape Breton having received information that France and Great Britain had become principals in the war, took possession of de Canseau with a small military and naval force, and made the garrison, and inhabitants prisoners of war. This enterprise was followed by an attempt on Annapolis, which was defeated by the timely arrival of a reinforcement from Massachusetts. These offensive operations stimulated the English colonists to additional efforts to expel such dangerous neighbors, and to unite the whole northern continent bordering on the Atlantic, under one common sovereign.

The governor of Cape Breton, having learned that France and Great Britain were now key players in the war, took control of de Canseau with a small military and naval force, capturing the garrison and the local inhabitants as prisoners of war. This action was followed by an attempt on Annapolis, which was thwarted by the timely arrival of reinforcements from Massachusetts. These aggressive moves motivated the English colonists to make greater efforts to push out such threatening neighbors and to unify the entire northern Atlantic coast under one common ruler.

The island of Cape Breton, so denominated from one of its capes, lies between the 45th and 47th degree of north latitude, at the distance of fifteen leagues from Cape Ray, the south western extremity of Newfoundland. Its position rendered the possession of it very material to the commerce of France; and the facility with which the fisheries might be annoyed from its ports, gave it an importance to which it could not otherwise have been entitled. Thirty millions of livres,[135] and the labour of twenty-five years, had been employed on its fortifications. From its strength, and still more from the numerous privateers that issued from its ports, it had been termed the Dunkirk[136] of America. On this place, governor Shirley meditated an attack.

The island of Cape Breton, named after one of its capes, is located between the 45th and 47th degrees of north latitude, about fifteen leagues from Cape Ray, the southwestern tip of Newfoundland. Its location made it very important for France's commerce, and the ease with which fisheries could be targeted from its ports added to its significance. Thirty million livres,[135] and twenty-five years of labor were invested in its fortifications. Due to its strength, and even more so because of the many privateers that operated from its ports, it was referred to as the Dunkirk[136] of America. Governor Shirley was planning an attack on this location.

The prisoners taken at Canseau, and others who had been captured at sea and carried to Louisbourg, were sent to Boston. The information they gave, if it did not originally suggest this enterprise, contributed greatly to its adoption. They said that Duvivier had gone to France to solicit assistance for the conquest of Nova Scotia, in the course of the ensuing campaign; and that the store ships from France for Cape Breton, not having arrived on the coast until it was blocked up with ice, had retired to the West Indies.

The prisoners taken at Canseau, along with others who had been captured at sea and taken to Louisbourg, were sent to Boston. The information they provided, even if it didn’t initially spark this plan, played a significant role in its approval. They reported that Duvivier had gone to France to seek help for the conquest of Nova Scotia during the upcoming campaign; and that the supply ships from France heading to Cape Breton hadn’t arrived on the coast until it was frozen over with ice, so they returned to the West Indies.

In several letters addressed to administration, governor Shirley represented the danger to which Nova Scotia was exposed, and pressed for naval assistance. These letters were sent by captain Ryal, an officer of the garrison which had been taken at Canseau, whose knowledge of Louisbourg, of Cape Breton, and of Nova Scotia, enabled him to make such representations to the lords of the admiralty, as were calculated to promote the views of the northern colonies.

In several letters sent to the administration, Governor Shirley highlighted the threats facing Nova Scotia and requested naval support. These letters were delivered by Captain Ryal, an officer of the garrison that had been captured at Canseau. His familiarity with Louisbourg, Cape Breton, and Nova Scotia allowed him to make compelling arguments to the lords of the admiralty, which were aimed at advancing the interests of the northern colonies.

The governor was not disappointed. Orders were dispatched to commodore Warren, then in the West Indies, to proceed towards the north, early in the spring; and to employ such a force as might be necessary to protect the northern colonies in their trade and fisheries, as well as to distress the enemy. On these subjects, he was instructed to consult with Shirley, to whom orders of the same date were written, directing him to assist the King's ships with transports, men, and provisions.

The governor was pleased. Orders were sent to Commodore Warren, who was in the West Indies, to head north early in the spring and to use whatever force was needed to protect the northern colonies in their trade and fisheries, as well as to disrupt the enemy. He was instructed to discuss these matters with Shirley, who also received orders at the same time, directing him to help the King's ships with transports, personnel, and supplies.

Such deep impression had the design of taking Louisbourg made on the mind of Shirley, that he did not wait for intelligence of the reception given to his application for naval assistance. He was induced to decide on engaging in the enterprise, even without such assistance, by the representations of Mr. Vaughan, son of the lieutenant governor of New Hampshire, a man of a sanguine and ardent temper, who could think nothing impracticable which he wished to achieve. Mr. Vaughan had never been at Louisbourg, but had learned something of the strength of the place, from fishermen and others; and the bold turn of his mind suggested the idea of surprising it. There is something infectious in enthusiasm, whatever be its object; and Vaughan soon communicated his own convictions to Shirley.[137]

The plan to take Louisbourg made such a strong impression on Shirley that he didn’t wait for news about how his request for naval support was received. He decided to go ahead with the mission even without that help, influenced by Mr. Vaughan, the son of New Hampshire’s lieutenant governor. Vaughan was an optimistic and passionate man who believed anything he wanted to achieve was possible. Although he had never been to Louisbourg, he gathered information about the fort’s defenses from fishermen and others. His bold mindset inspired the idea of launching a surprise attack. Enthusiasm is contagious, no matter what it's aimed at, and Vaughan quickly shared his beliefs with Shirley.[137]

1745

The governor informed the general court that he had a proposition of great importance to communicate, and requested that the members would take an oath of secrecy, previous to his laying it before them. This novel request being complied with, he submitted his plan for attacking Louisbourg. It was referred to a committee of both houses; the arguments for and against the enterprise were temperately considered; and the part suggested by prudence prevailed. The expedition was thought too great, too hazardous, and too expensive.

The governor told the general court that he had a very important proposal to share and asked the members to take an oath of secrecy before he presented it to them. After they agreed to this unusual request, he revealed his plan for attacking Louisbourg. It was sent to a committee from both houses; the pros and cons of the mission were discussed thoughtfully, and the cautious approach won out. The expedition was deemed too ambitious, too risky, and too costly.

The report of the committee was approved by the house of representatives, and the expedition was supposed to be abandoned; but, notwithstanding the precaution taken to secure secrecy, the subject which had occupied the legislature was divulged,[138] and the people took a deep interest in it. Numerous petitions were presented, praying the general court to re-consider its vote, and to adopt the proposition of the governor. Among the several arguments urged in its favour, that which the petitioners pressed most earnestly, was the necessity of acquiring Louisbourg, to save the fisheries from ruin.

The committee's report was approved by the House of Representatives, and it was thought that the expedition would be called off. However, despite efforts to keep it a secret, the topic that the legislature had been discussing was revealed, and the public became very interested. Many petitions were submitted, asking the general court to reconsider its decision and support the governor's proposal. Among the various arguments made in favor of it, the one that the petitioners emphasized the most was the need to acquire Louisbourg to protect the fisheries from destruction.

The subject being re-considered, a resolution in favour of the enterprise was carried by a single voice, in the absence of several members known to be against it. Yet all parties manifested equal zeal for its success. A general embargo was laid, and messengers were despatched to the several governments as far south as Pennsylvania, soliciting their aid. These solicitations succeeded only in the northern provinces. There being at that time no person in New England who had acquired any military reputation, the chief command was conferred on colonel Pepperel, a merchant, who was also a large land holder, and was highly respected throughout Massachusetts.[139]

The topic was revisited, and a resolution to support the project was passed by a narrow margin, with several members who opposed it absent. Still, everyone showed equal enthusiasm for its success. A general embargo was imposed, and messengers were sent to various governments as far south as Pennsylvania, asking for their support. These requests only found traction in the northern states. At that time, no one in New England had gained any military recognition, so the main command was given to Colonel Pepperel, a merchant who was also a significant landowner and gained great respect across Massachusetts.[139]

All ranks of men combined to facilitate the enterprise, and those circumstances which are beyond human control, also concurred to favour the general wish.

All levels of men came together to support the effort, and the circumstances beyond human control also aligned to favor the common desire.

The governors of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, whose orders forbade their assent to a farther emission of bills of credit, departed from their instructions to promote this favourite project; the people submitted to impressments of their property; and a mild winter gave no interruption to their warlike preparations.

The governors of Massachusetts and New Hampshire, whose orders prohibited them from agreeing to a further issuance of bills of credit, went against their instructions to support this popular initiative; the people accepted the seizure of their property; and a mild winter did not interfere with their military preparations.

The troops of Massachusetts,[140] New Hampshire, and Connecticut, amounting to rather more than four thousand men, assembled at Canseau about the middle of April; soon after which, to the great joy of the colonial troops, admiral Warren arrived, with a considerable part of his fleet. The army then embarked for Chapeau-rouge bay, and the fleet cruised off Louisbourg.

The troops from Massachusetts,[140] New Hampshire, and Connecticut, totaling over four thousand men, gathered at Canseau around mid-April. Shortly after that, to the delight of the colonial troops, Admiral Warren showed up with a significant portion of his fleet. The army then boarded ships for Chapeau-rouge Bay, while the fleet patrolled off Louisbourg.

After repulsing a small detachment of French troops, the landing was effected; and, in the course of the night, a body of about four hundred men led by Vaughan, marched round to the north east part of the harbour, and set fire to a number of warehouses containing spirituous liquors and naval stores. The smoke being driven by the wind into the grand battery, caused such darkness that the men placed in it were unable to distinguish objects; and, being apprehensive of an attack from the whole English army, abandoned the fort and fled into the town.

After pushing back a small group of French soldiers, the landing took place; and during the night, a group of about four hundred men led by Vaughan marched to the northeast part of the harbor and set fire to several warehouses full of alcohol and naval supplies. The wind carried the smoke into the grand battery, creating such darkness that the men stationed there couldn't see anything; fearing an attack from the entire English army, they abandoned the fort and ran into the town.

The next morning, as Vaughan was returning to camp with only thirteen men, he ascended the hill which overlooked the battery, and observing that the chimneys in the barracks were without smoke, and the staff without its flag, he hired an Indian, with a bottle of rum, to crawl through an embrasure, and open the gate. Vaughan entered with his men and defended the battery against a party then landing to regain possession until the arrival of a reinforcement.

The next morning, as Vaughan was heading back to camp with just thirteen men, he climbed the hill that overlooked the battery. Noticing that the chimneys in the barracks weren't producing any smoke and the staff didn't have its flag up, he hired an Indian with a bottle of rum to crawl through an opening and unlock the gate. Vaughan and his men entered and defended the battery against a group that was landing to try to take it back until reinforcements arrived.

For fourteen nights successively, the troops were employed in dragging cannon from the landing place to the encampment, a distance of near two miles, through a deep morass. The army, being totally unacquainted with the art of conducting sieges, made its approaches irregularly, and sustained some loss on this account.

For fourteen nights in a row, the troops worked to pull cannons from the landing area to the campsite, which was almost two miles away, through a muddy swamp. The army, being completely unfamiliar with how to conduct sieges, made their approaches haphazardly and suffered some losses because of it.

While these approaches were making by land, the ships of war which continued to cruise off the harbour, fell in with and captured the Vigilant, a French man of war of sixty-four guns, having on board a reinforcement of five hundred and sixty men, and a large quantity of stores for the garrison. Soon after this, an unsuccessful, and, perhaps, a rash attempt was made on the island battery by four hundred men; of whom sixty were killed, and one hundred and sixteen taken prisoners. All these prisoners, as if by previous concert, exaggerated the numbers of the besieging army, a deception which was favoured by the unevenness of the ground, and the dispersed state of the troops; and which probably contributed to the surrender of the place. The provincial army did indeed present a formidable front, but, in the rear, all was frolic and confusion.

While these efforts were underway on land, the warships that continued to patrol off the harbor encountered and captured the Vigilant, a French warship with sixty-four guns, carrying a reinforcement of five hundred and sixty men and a large supply of provisions for the garrison. Shortly after this, there was an ill-fated and possibly reckless attack on the island battery by four hundred men; of these, sixty were killed, and one hundred and sixteen were taken prisoner. All these prisoners, as if they had coordinated in advance, exaggerated the size of the besieging army, a deception that was aided by the uneven terrain and the scattered state of the troops; this likely contributed to the surrender of the location. The provincial army did present a strong front, but behind them, there was chaos and confusion.

The Vigilant had been anxiously expected by the garrison, and the information of her capture excited a considerable degree of perturbation. This event, with the erection of some works on the high cliff at the light house, by which the island battery was much annoyed, and the preparations evidently making for a general assault, determined Duchambon, the governor of Louisbourg, to surrender; and, in a few days, he capitulated.

The Vigilant had been eagerly anticipated by the garrison, and news of her capture caused a significant amount of distress. This event, along with the construction of some defenses on the high cliff at the lighthouse that were greatly troubling the island battery, and the clear preparations for a full-scale attack, led Duchambon, the governor of Louisbourg, to decide to surrender; and within a few days, he capitulated.

Louisbourg surrenders.

Upon entering the fortress, and viewing its strength, and its means of defence, all perceived how impracticable it would have been to carry it by assault.[141]

Upon entering the fortress and seeing its strength and defenses, everyone realized how impossible it would have been to capture it by force.[141]

The joy excited in the British colonies by the success of the expedition against Louisbourg was unbounded. Even those who had refused to participate in its hazards and expense, were sensible of its advantages, and of the lustre it shed on the American arms. Although some disposition was manifested in England, to ascribe the whole merit of the conquest to the navy, colonel Pepperel received, with the title of baronet, the more substantial reward of a regiment in the British service, to be raised in America; and the same mark of royal favour was bestowed on governor Shirley. Reimbursements too were made by parliament for the expenses of the expedition. It was the only decisive advantage obtained by the English during the war.

The joy felt in the British colonies from the success of the expedition against Louisbourg was immense. Even those who chose not to take part in its risks and costs recognized its benefits and the pride it brought to American forces. Although some in England tried to credit the entire victory to the navy, Colonel Pepperell was honored with the title of baronet and received the more tangible reward of a regiment in the British service to be established in America; Governor Shirley received the same royal favor. Parliament also reimbursed the costs of the expedition. It was the only significant win for the English during the war.

The capture of Louisbourg, most probably, preserved Nova Scotia. Duvivier, who had embarked for France to solicit an armament for the conquest of that province, sailed, in July, 1745, with seven ships of war, and a body of land forces. He was ordered to stop at Louisbourg, and thence to proceed in the execution of his plan. Hearing, at sea, of the fall of that place, and that a British squadron was stationed at it, he relinquished the expedition against Nova Scotia, and returned to Europe.

The capture of Louisbourg likely saved Nova Scotia. Duvivier, who had set off for France to request military support for taking over that province, sailed in July 1745 with seven warships and a group of land troops. He was instructed to stop at Louisbourg and then carry out his plan from there. Upon learning at sea about the fall of that location and that a British squadron was stationed there, he abandoned the mission against Nova Scotia and headed back to Europe.

The British empire on the American continent consisted, originally, of two feeble settlements unconnected with, and almost unknown to each other. For a long time the southern colonies, separated from those of New England by an immense wilderness, and by the possessions of other European powers, had no intercourse with them, except what was produced by the small trading vessels of the north, which occasionally entered the rivers of the south. Neither participated in the wars or pursuits of the other; nor were they, in any respect, actuated by common views, or united by common interest. The conquest of the country between Connecticut and Maryland, laid a foundation, which the settlement of the middle colonies completed, for connecting these disjoined members, and forming one consolidated whole, capable of moving, and acting in concert. This gradual change, unobserved in its commencement, had now become too perceptible to be longer overlooked; and, henceforward, the efforts of the colonies, were in a great measure combined, and directed to a common object.

The British Empire in America originally consisted of two weak settlements that were unconnected and almost unknown to each other. For a long time, the southern colonies, separated from New England by a vast wilderness and the territories of other European powers, had no contact with them, except for the occasional small trading vessels from the north that entered southern rivers. They didn’t engage in each other’s wars or activities, nor were they motivated by shared goals or linked by common interests. The takeover of the land between Connecticut and Maryland laid a foundation that the settlement of the middle colonies completed, allowing these separated parts to connect and form a unified entity that could act together. This gradual change, unnoticed at first, had now become too obvious to ignore; from this point on, the colonies’ efforts were largely combined and aimed at a common goal.

France, as well as England, had extended her views with her settlements; and, after the fall of Louisbourg, the governments of both nations meditated important operations for the ensuing campaign in America.

France, along with England, had broadened her perspectives with her settlements; and after the fall of Louisbourg, the governments of both nations were planning significant actions for the upcoming campaign in America.

Great plans of the belligerents.

France contemplated, not only the recovery of Cape Breton and Nova Scotia, but the total devastation of the sea coast, if not the entire conquest of New England.

France considered not just reclaiming Cape Breton and Nova Scotia, but also completely destroying the coast and possibly conquering all of New England.

Britain, on her part, calculated on the reduction of Canada, and the entire expulsion of the French from the American continent.

Britain, for her part, relied on reducing Canada and completely removing the French from the American continent.

Shirley repaired to Louisbourg, after its surrender, where he held a consultation with Warren and Pepperel on the favourite subject of future and more extensive operations against the neighbouring possessions of France. 1746From that place he wrote pressingly to administration, for reinforcements of men and ships to enable him to execute his plans. The capture of Louisbourg gave such weight to his solicitations that, in the following spring, the duke of New Castle, then secretary of state, addressed a circular letter to the governors of the provinces as far south as Virginia, requiring them to raise as many men as they could spare, and hold them in readiness to act according to the orders that should be received. Before this letter was written, an extensive plan of operations had been digested in the British cabinet. It was proposed to detach a military and naval armament which should, early in the season, join the troops to be raised in New England, at Louisbourg; whence they were to proceed up the St. Lawrence to Quebec. The troops from New York, and from the more southern provinces, were to be collected at Albany, and to march against Crown Point, and Montreal.

Shirley went to Louisbourg after it surrendered, where he had a meeting with Warren and Pepperel to discuss their favorite topic: planning future and larger operations against nearby French territories. 1746 From there, he wrote urgently to the government for more men and ships to help him carry out his plans. The capture of Louisbourg made his requests more compelling, so in the following spring, the Duke of New Castle, who was the secretary of state at the time, sent out a circular letter to the governors of the provinces as far south as Virginia, asking them to recruit as many men as possible and keep them ready to follow the orders they would receive. Before this letter was sent, a detailed plan for operations had already been worked out in the British cabinet. The plan was to send a military and naval force that would, early in the season, join the troops raised in New England at Louisbourg. From there, they were to move up the St. Lawrence River to Quebec. Troops from New York and the southern provinces would be gathered in Albany and then march against Crown Point and Montreal.

This plan, so far as it depended on the colonies, was executed with promptness and alacrity. The men were raised, and waited with impatience for employment; but neither troops, nor orders, arrived from England. The fleet destined for this service, sailed seven times from Spithead; and was compelled as often, by contrary winds, to return.

This plan, as far as it relied on the colonies, was carried out quickly and enthusiastically. The men were recruited and eagerly awaited their assignments, but neither troops nor orders came from England. The fleet meant for this mission set sail seven times from Spithead, only to be forced back each time by unfavorable winds.

Late in the season, the military commanders in America, despairing of the succours promised by England, determined to assemble a body of provincials at Albany, and make an attempt on Crown Point. While preparing for the execution of this plan, they received accounts stating that Annapolis was in danger from a body of French and Indians assembled at Minas; upon which, orders were issued for the troops of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire, to embark for Nova Scotia. Before these orders could be executed, intelligence was received which directed their attention to their own defence.

Late in the season, the military leaders in America, losing hope for the support promised by England, decided to gather a group of locals in Albany to try and take Crown Point. While they were getting ready to carry out this plan, they heard reports that Annapolis was under threat from a group of French and Indians gathered at Minas. As a result, orders were issued for the troops from Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire to head to Nova Scotia. Before these orders could be carried out, they received news that shifted their focus to their own defense.

It was reported that a large fleet and army, under the command of the duke D'Anville, had arrived in Nova Scotia, and the views of conquest, which had been formed by the northern colonies, were converted into fears for their own safety. For six weeks, continual apprehensions of invasion were entertained; and the most vigorous measures were taken to repel it. From this state of anxious solicitude, they were at length relieved by the arrival of some prisoners set at liberty by the French, who communicated the extreme distress of the fleet.

It was reported that a large fleet and army, led by Duke D'Anville, had arrived in Nova Scotia, and the desire for conquest that had been held by the northern colonies turned into fears for their own safety. For six weeks, they were constantly worried about an invasion and took strong measures to defend themselves. Finally, they were relieved from this state of anxiety by the arrival of some prisoners released by the French, who shared the severe struggles of the fleet.

This formidable armament consisted of near forty ships of war, seven of which were of the line; of two artillery ships; and of fifty-six transports laden with provisions and military stores, carrying three thousand five hundred land forces, and forty thousand stand of small arms, for the use of the Canadians and Indians. The French fleet dispersed by a storm.The fleet sailed in June, but was attacked by such furious and repeated storms, that many of the ships were wrecked, and others dispersed. In addition to this disaster, the troops were infected with a disease which carried them off in great numbers. While lying in Chebucto, under these circumstances, a vessel which had been dispatched by governor Shirley to admiral Townshend at Louisbourg, with a letter stating his expectation that a British fleet would follow that of France to America, was intercepted by a cruiser, and brought in to the admiral. These dispatches were opened in a council of war, which was considerably divided respecting their future conduct. This circumstance, added to the calamities already sustained, so affected the commander in chief, that he died suddenly. The vice-admiral fell by his own hand; and the command devolved on Monsieur le Jonguiere, governor of Canada, who had been declared chef d'escadre after the fleet sailed.

This powerful armada consisted of nearly forty warships, seven of which were battleships; two artillery ships; and fifty-six transports filled with supplies and military equipment, carrying three thousand five hundred ground troops and forty thousand small arms for the Canadians and Indigenous people. The French fleet was broken up by a storm. The fleet set sail in June but was hit by such fierce and continuous storms that many ships were wrecked, and others were scattered. On top of this disaster, the troops became afflicted with a disease that took many lives. While anchored in Chebucto under these conditions, a ship that had been sent by Governor Shirley to Admiral Townshend at Louisbourg, with a letter expressing his expectation that a British fleet would follow the French fleet to America, was intercepted by a cruiser and brought to the admiral. These dispatches were opened at a war council, which was notably divided about their future actions. This situation, combined with the hardships already faced, affected the commander-in-chief so much that he died suddenly. The vice-admiral took his own life, and command then fell to Monsieur le Jonguiere, the governor of Canada, who had been named chef d'escadre after the fleet had set sail.

The design of invading New England was relinquished, and it was resolved to make an attempt on Annapolis. With this view the fleet sailed from Chebucto, but was again overtaken by a violent tempest which scattered the vessels composing it. Those which escaped shipwreck returned singly to France.[142]

The plan to invade New England was abandoned, and it was decided to try for Annapolis instead. With this in mind, the fleet set sail from Chebucto but was soon hit by a violent storm that scattered the ships. Those that didn't sink returned to France one by one.[142]

"Never," says Mr. Belknap, "was the hand of divine providence more visible than on this occasion. Never was a disappointment more severe on the part of the enemy, nor a deliverance more complete, without human help, in favour of this country."

"Never," says Mr. Belknap, "has the hand of divine providence been more visible than now. Never has the enemy faced a more severe disappointment, nor has this country experienced a more complete deliverance, without any human intervention."

As soon as the fears excited by this armament were dissipated, the project of dislodging the French and Indians, who had invaded Nova Scotia, was resumed. Governor Shirley detached a part of the troops of Massachusetts on this service; and pressed the governors of Rhode Island and New Hampshire, to co-operate with him. The quotas furnished by these colonies were prevented by several accidents from joining that of Massachusetts, which was inferior to the enemy in numbers. The French and Indians, under cover of a snow storm, surprised the English at Minas; who, after an obstinate resistance, in which they lost upwards of one hundred men, were compelled to capitulate, and to engage not to bear arms against his Most Christian Majesty, in Nova Scotia for one year. De Ramsay, who commanded the French, returned soon afterwards to Canada.

As soon as the fears caused by this military buildup went away, the plan to drive out the French and Indians who had invaded Nova Scotia was picked up again. Governor Shirley sent part of the Massachusetts troops for this mission and urged the governors of Rhode Island and New Hampshire to work with him. The contributions from these colonies were held up by several unforeseen events, preventing them from joining Massachusetts, which was outnumbered by the enemy. The French and Indians took advantage of a snowstorm to surprise the English at Minas. After a fierce fight, where they lost over a hundred men, the English had no choice but to surrender and agree not to take up arms against his Most Christian Majesty in Nova Scotia for one year. De Ramsay, who led the French forces, soon returned to Canada.

No farther transactions of importance took place in America during the war, which was terminated by the treaty of Aix la Chapelle. By this treaty, it was stipulated that all conquests made during the war should be restored; and the colonists had the mortification to see the French re-possess themselves of Cape Breton.

No significant transactions occurred in America during the war, which ended with the treaty of Aix la Chapelle. This treaty stated that all conquests made during the war should be returned, and the colonists were disappointed to see the French regain control of Cape Breton.

The heavy expenses which had been incurred by the New England colonies, and especially by Massachusetts, had occasioned large emissions of paper money, and an unavoidable depreciation. Instead of availing themselves of peace, to discharge the debts contracted during war, they eagerly desired to satisfy every demand on the public treasury, by farther emissions of bills of credit, redeemable at future and distant periods. Every inconvenience under which commerce was supposed to labour, every difficulty encountered in the interior economy of the province, was attributed to a scarcity of money; and this scarcity was to be removed, not by increased industry, but by putting an additional sum in circulation. The rate of exchange, and the price of all commodities, soon disclosed the political truth that, however the quantity of the circulating medium may be augmented, its aggregate value cannot be arbitrarily increased; and that the effect of such a depreciating currency must necessarily be, to discourage the payment of debts, by holding out the hope of discharging contracts with less real value than that for which they were made; and to substitute cunning and speculation, for honest and regular industry. Yet the majority had persevered in this demoralising system. The depreciation had reached eleven for one; and the evil was almost deemed incurable, when the fortunate circumstance of a reimbursement in specie, made by parliament for colonial expenditures on account of the expeditions against Louisbourg and Canada, suggested to Mr. Hutchinson, speaker of the house of representatives in Massachusetts, the idea of redeeming the paper money in circulation, at its then real value.

The high costs incurred by the New England colonies, especially Massachusetts, led to significant amounts of paper money being issued, resulting in inevitable depreciation. Instead of using peace as an opportunity to pay off war debts, they were eager to meet every demand on the public treasury by issuing even more bills of credit that would be redeemable at future dates. Every issue affecting commerce and every challenge faced within the province was blamed on a lack of money; this shortage was to be resolved, not with increased effort, but by circulating more cash. The exchange rate and the prices of all goods soon revealed a political truth: no matter how much the amount of money in circulation grows, its total value can't be arbitrarily increased. The consequence of such a depreciating currency would inevitably discourage debt repayment by creating the expectation that contracts could be settled with less real value than what they were initially worth, replacing honest effort with trickery and speculation. Yet, most people continued with this harmful approach. The depreciation had reached eleven to one, and the problem was almost viewed as unfixable when a fortunate situation arose: parliament reimbursed the colonies for expenses related to the campaigns against Louisbourg and Canada, which led Mr. Hutchinson, speaker of the house of representatives in Massachusetts, to consider redeeming the circulating paper money at its actual value at the time.

This scheme, at first deemed Utopian, was opposed by many well meaning men who feared that its effect would be to give a shock to the trade and domestic industry of the province; and who thought that, as the depreciation had been gradual, justice required that the appreciation should be gradual also.

This plan, initially seen as unrealistic, was opposed by many well-meaning people who worried that it would disrupt trade and local industry in the region; and who believed that since the depreciation had been gradual, fairness demanded that the appreciation should also happen gradually.

Paper money redeemed.

With great difficulty, the measure was carried; and the bills of credit in circulation, were redeemed at fifty shillings the ounce. The evils which had been apprehended were soon found to be imaginary. Specie immediately took the place of paper. Trade, so far from sustaining a shock, nourished more than before this change in the domestic economy of the colony; and the commerce of Massachusetts immediately received an impulse, which enabled it to surpass that of her neighbours who retained their paper medium.[143]

With a lot of effort, the measure passed, and the paper currency in circulation was redeemed at fifty shillings per ounce. The worries people had turned out to be unfounded. Coin quickly replaced paper money. Trade, instead of suffering a setback, actually thrived more than it had before this shift in the colony's economy; and Massachusetts' commerce received a boost that allowed it to outpace that of its neighbors who still used paper currency.[143]

Renewal of contests with the French colonies respecting boundary.

The treaty of Aix la Chapelle did not remove the previously existing controversies between the colonies of France and England respecting boundary. These controversies, originating in the manner in which their settlements had been made, and at first of small consequence, were now assuming a serious aspect. America was becoming an object of greater attention; and, as her importance increased, the question concerning limits became important also.

The Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle did not resolve the ongoing disputes between the French and English colonies regarding their borders. These disputes, which started from how their settlements were established and were initially minor, were now becoming serious. America was gaining more attention, and as its significance grew, the issue of boundaries became more critical as well.

1749

In settling this continent, the powers of Europe, estimating the right of the natives at nothing, adopted, for their own government, the principle, that those who first discovered and took possession of any particular territory, became its rightful proprietors. But as only a small portion of it could then be reduced to actual occupation, the extent of country thus acquired was not well ascertained. Contests respecting prior discovery, and extent of possession, arose among all the first settlers. England terminated her controversy with Sweden and with Holland, by the early conquest of their territories; but her conflicting claims with France and with Spain, remained unadjusted.

In settling this continent, European powers, disregarding the rights of the natives, adopted the principle that those who first discovered and claimed a piece of land became its rightful owners. However, since only a small part of it could be actually occupied at the time, the amount of land acquired was not clearly defined. Disputes over prior discoveries and the extent of claims emerged among the early settlers. England resolved its conflicts with Sweden and Holland through the early conquest of their lands, but its competing claims with France and Spain remained unresolved.

On the south, Spain had pretensions to the whole province of Georgia, while England had granted the country as far as the river St. Matheo, in Florida.

On the south, Spain aimed to claim the entire province of Georgia, while England had granted the territory up to the St. Matheo River in Florida.

On the north, the right of France to Canada was undisputed; but the country between the St. Lawrence and New England had been claimed by both nations, and granted by both. The first settlement appears to have been made by the French; but its principal town, called Port Royal, or Annapolis, had been repeatedly taken by the English; and, by the treaty of Utrecht, the whole province, by the name of Nova Scotia, or Acadié, according to its ancient limits had been ceded to them.

On the north, France's claim to Canada was uncontested; however, the area between the St. Lawrence and New England was claimed by both countries and acknowledged by both. The first settlement seems to have been established by the French, but its main town, known as Port Royal or Annapolis, was captured multiple times by the English. According to the treaty of Utrecht, the entire province, referred to as Nova Scotia or Acadié, was ceded to them within its historical boundaries.

But the boundaries of Nova Scotia, or Acadié, had never been ascertained. Though the treaty of Utrecht had provided that commissioners should be appointed by the two crowns, to adjust the limits of their respective colonies, the adjustment had never been made. France claimed to the Kennebec; and insisted "that only the peninsula which is formed by the bay of Fundy, the Atlantic ocean, and the gulf of St. Lawrence," was included in the cession of "Nova Scotia, or Acadié, according to its ancient limits." England, on the other hand, claimed all the country on the main land south of the river St. Lawrence. Under the treaty of Aix la Chapelle, commissioners were again appointed to settle these differences, who maintained the rights of their respective sovereigns with great ability, and laborious research; but their zeal produced a degree of asperity unfavourable to accommodation.

But the borders of Nova Scotia, or Acadié, had never been established. Although the Treaty of Utrecht stated that commissioners should be appointed by both crowns to define the boundaries of their colonies, that adjustment never happened. France claimed down to the Kennebec River and insisted that "only the peninsula formed by the Bay of Fundy, the Atlantic Ocean, and the Gulf of St. Lawrence" was included in the cession of "Nova Scotia, or Acadié, according to its ancient limits." England, on the other hand, claimed all the territory on the mainland south of the St. Lawrence River. Under the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle, commissioners were once again appointed to resolve these disputes, and they defended the rights of their respective sovereigns with great skill and thorough research; however, their fervor led to a level of sharpness that was not conducive to compromise.

While this contest for the cold and uninviting country of Nova Scotia was carried on with equal acrimony and talents, a controversy arose for richer and more extensive regions in the south and west.

While the competition for the harsh and unwelcoming land of Nova Scotia was marked by equal bitterness and skill, a debate emerged over more prosperous and larger areas in the south and west.

Discovery of the Mississippi.

So early as the year 1660, information was received, in Canada, from the Indians, that, west of that colony, was a great river, flowing neither to the north, nor to the east. The government, conjecturing that it must empty itself either into the gulf of Mexico or the south sea, committed the care of ascertaining the fact to Joliet, an inhabitant of Quebec, and to the Jesuit Marquette. These men proceeded from lake Michigan up the river of the Foxes, almost to its source, whence they travelled westward to the Ouisconsing, which they pursued to its confluence with the Mississippi. They sailed down this river to the 33d degree of north latitude, and returned by land, through the country of the Illinois, to Canada.

As early as 1660, people in Canada got information from the Native Americans that there was a big river to the west of the colony, flowing neither north nor east. The government guessed that it must lead into either the Gulf of Mexico or the South Sea, so they entrusted the task of figuring it out to Joliet, a resident of Quebec, and the Jesuit Marquette. These men traveled from Lake Michigan up the Fox River, almost to its source, then headed west to the Wisconsin River, which they followed to where it meets the Mississippi. They then sailed down this river to the 33rd parallel north and returned by land through the land of the Illinois back to Canada.

The mouth of the Mississippi was afterwards discovered by la Salle, an enterprising Norman, who, immediately after his return to Quebec, embarked for France, in the hope of inducing the cabinet of Versailles to patronise a scheme for proceeding by sea to the mouth of that river and settling a colony on its banks.

The mouth of the Mississippi was later discovered by la Salle, an adventurous Norman, who, right after getting back to Quebec, set sail for France. He hoped to convince the government in Versailles to support a plan to travel by sea to the river’s mouth and establish a colony along its banks.

Having succeeded in this application, he sailed for the gulf of Mexico, with a few colonists; but, steering too far westward, he arrived at the bay of St. Bernard, about one hundred leagues from the mouth of the Mississippi. In consequence of a quarrel between him and Beaulieu, who commanded the fleet, the colonists were landed at this place. La Salle was, soon afterwards, assassinated by his own men; and his followers were murdered or dispersed by the Spaniards and the Indians.

Having succeeded in this application, he set sail for the Gulf of Mexico with a few colonists. However, steering too far west, he reached the Bay of St. Bernard, about one hundred leagues from the mouth of the Mississippi. Due to a conflict between him and Beaulieu, who commanded the fleet, the colonists were landed at this location. La Salle was soon after assassinated by his own men, and his followers were either killed or scattered by the Spaniards and the Indians.

Several other attempts were made by the French to settle the country; but, by some unaccountable fatality, instead of seating themselves on the fertile borders of the Mississippi, they continually landed about the barren sands of Biloxi, and the bay of Mobile. It was not until the year 1722, that the miserable remnant of those who had been carried thither at various times, was transplanted to New Orleans; nor until the year 1731, that the colony began to flourish.

Several other attempts were made by the French to settle the country, but for some strange reason, instead of settling on the fertile banks of the Mississippi, they kept landing in the barren sands of Biloxi and the bay of Mobile. It wasn't until 1722 that the small group of those who had been taken there at different times was moved to New Orleans; and it wasn't until 1731 that the colony began to prosper.

Scheme for connecting Louisiana with Canada.

It had received the name of Louisiana, and soon extended itself by detached settlements, up the Mississippi and its waters, towards the great lakes.[144] As it advanced northward, the vast and interesting plan was formed of connecting it with Canada by a chain of forts.

It was called Louisiana and quickly expanded through separate settlements along the Mississippi and its waterways, heading towards the Great Lakes.[144] As it moved north, an ambitious plan emerged to link it with Canada by a series of forts.

The fine climate and fertile soil of upper Louisiana enabling it to produce and maintain an immense population, rendered it an object which promised complete gratification to the views of France; while the extent given to it by that nation, excited the most serious alarm among the colonies of Britain.

The great climate and rich soil of upper Louisiana, which allowed it to support a large population, made it very appealing to France's interests; at the same time, the size of the area claimed by that nation caused significant concern among Britain's colonies.

The charters granted by the crown of England to the first adventurers, having extended from the Atlantic to the South Sea, their settlements had regularly advanced westward, in the belief that their title to the country in that direction, could not be controverted. The settlements of the French, stretching from north to south, necessarily interfered with those of the English. Their plan, if executed, would completely environ the English. Canada and Louisiana united, as has been aptly said, would form a bow, of which the English colonies would constitute the chord.

The charters given by the English crown to the early explorers, stretching from the Atlantic Ocean to the South Sea, allowed their settlements to steadily move westward, believing that their claim to the land in that direction couldn’t be challenged. The French settlements, extending from north to south, inevitably clashed with those of the English. If their plans had been carried out, they would have completely surrounded the English colonies. As has been rightly noted, Canada and Louisiana together would create a bow, with the English colonies forming the string.

While Great Britain claimed, indefinitely, to the west, as appertaining to her possession of the sea coast; France insisted on confining her to the eastern side of the Apalachian, or Alleghany, mountains; and claimed the whole country drained by the Mississippi, in virtue of her right as the first discoverer of that river. The delightful region which forms the magnificent vale of the Mississippi was the object for which these two powerful nations contended; and it soon became apparent that the sword must decide the contest.

While Great Britain indefinitely claimed land to the west, based on its ownership of the coastline, France insisted on restricting them to the eastern side of the Appalachian or Allegheny mountains, while claiming the entire area drained by the Mississippi River, based on its rights as the first to discover that river. The beautiful region that makes up the stunning valley of the Mississippi became the prize these two powerful nations fought over, and it quickly became clear that conflict was the only way to settle the dispute.

The white population of the English colonies was supposed to exceed one million of souls, while that of the French was estimated at only fifty-two thousand.[145]

The white population of the English colonies was expected to be over a million people, while the French population was estimated to be only fifty-two thousand.[145]

This disparity of numbers did not intimidate the governor of New France—a title comprehending both Canada and Louisiana; nor deter him from proceeding in the execution of his favourite plan. The French possessed advantages which, he persuaded himself, would counterbalance the superior numbers of the English. Their whole power was united under one governor, who could give it such a direction as his judgment should dictate. The genius of the people and of the government was military; and the inhabitants could readily be called into the field, when their service should be required. Great reliance too was placed on the Indians. These savages, with the exception of the Five Nations, were generally attached to France, and were well trained to war. To these advantages was added a perfect knowledge of the country about to become the theatre of action.

This difference in numbers didn’t scare the governor of New France—a title that included both Canada and Louisiana; nor did it stop him from moving forward with his favorite plan. The French had advantages that he believed would balance out the English's superior numbers. Their entire force was united under one governor, who could steer it in whatever direction he deemed best. The people and the government had a military mindset, and the residents could easily be called to service when needed. There was also significant reliance on the Indians. Except for the Five Nations, most were loyal to France and well-trained for war. Additionally, they had an in-depth knowledge of the area that was about to be the battlefield.

The British colonies, on the other hand, were divided into distinct governments, unaccustomed, except those of New England, to act in concert; were jealous of the power of the crown; and were spread over a large extent of territory, the soil of which, in all the middle colonies, was cultivated by men unused to arms.

The British colonies, on the other hand, were split into separate governments, except for those in New England, which weren't used to working together; they were wary of the crown's power; and they covered a vast area, with the land in all the middle colonies farmed by people who weren't used to fighting.

The governors of Canada, who were generally military men, had, for several preceding years, judiciously selected and fortified such situations as would give them most influence over the Indians, and facilitate incursions into the northern provinces. The command of Lake Champlain had been acquired by the erection of a strong fort at Crown Point; and a connected chain of posts was maintained from Quebec, up the St. Lawrence, and along the great lakes. It was intended to unite these posts with the Mississippi by taking positions which would favour the design of circumscribing and annoying the frontier settlements of the English.

The governors of Canada, who were mostly military leaders, had wisely chosen and strengthened locations over the past few years that would give them the most influence over the Indigenous peoples and make it easier to launch attacks into the northern provinces. They gained control of Lake Champlain by building a strong fort at Crown Point, and they maintained a connected series of posts from Quebec, up the St. Lawrence, and across the Great Lakes. The plan was to link these posts with the Mississippi by establishing positions that would help to encircle and disrupt the English frontier settlements.

 

Great Meadows

Great Meadows

Great Meadows and the Site of Fort Necessity

Great Meadows and the Fort Necessity Site

On this battleground in the western Pennsylvania wilderness, which marked the beginning of the French and Indian War, July 3, 1754, a force of 400 men under young Major Washington was defeated by 900 French and Indian allies, and for the first and last time in his military career Washington surrendered. He stipulated, however, that he and his troops were to have safe conduct back to civilization, and agreed not to build a fort west of the Allegheny Mountains for a year. Washington was then twenty-two years old.

On this battlefield in the western Pennsylvania wilderness, which marked the start of the French and Indian War, on July 3, 1754, a group of 400 men led by young Major Washington was defeated by 900 French and Indian allies. For the first and last time in his military career, Washington surrendered. He did, however, insist that he and his troops would have safe passage back to civilization and agreed not to construct a fort west of the Allegheny Mountains for a year. Washington was just twenty-two years old at that time.

 

1750

The execution of this plan was, probably, accelerated by an act of the British government. The year after the conclusion of the war, several individuals both in England and Virginia who were associated under the name of the Ohio company, obtained from the crown a grant of six hundred thousand acres of land, lying in the country claimed by both nations. The objects of this company being commercial as well as territorial, measures were taken to derive all the advantages expected from their grant, in both these respects, by establishing trading houses, and by employing persons to survey the country.

The execution of this plan was likely sped up by an action from the British government. A year after the end of the war, several individuals in both England and Virginia, connected under the name of the Ohio Company, received a grant from the crown for six hundred thousand acres of land in the territory claimed by both nations. The goals of this company were both commercial and territorial, so steps were taken to maximize the benefits expected from their grant in both areas by setting up trading posts and hiring people to survey the land.

The governor of Canada, who obtained early information of this intrusion, as he deemed it, into the dominions of his most christian majesty, wrote to the governors of New York and Pennsylvania, informing them that the English traders had encroached on the French territory by trading with their Indians; and giving notice that, if they did not desist, he should be under the necessity of seizing them wherever they should be found. At the same time the jealousy of the Indians was excited by impressing them with fears that the English were about to deprive them of their country.

The governor of Canada, who got early word about this intrusion, as he saw it, into the lands of his most Christian Majesty, wrote to the governors of New York and Pennsylvania, informing them that English traders had invaded French territory by trading with their Indigenous people; and warning that if they didn’t stop, he would have to seize them wherever they were found. At the same time, the Indians' suspicions were raised by making them afraid that the English were going to take away their land.

His threat having been disregarded, the governor of Canada put it in execution by seizing the British traders among the Twightwees, and carrying them prisoners to Presque-isle, on Lake Erie; where he was erecting a strong fort. About the same time, a communication was opened from Presque-isle, down French creek, and the Alleghany river, to the Ohio. This communication was kept up by detachments of troops, posted at proper distances from each other, in works capable of covering them from an attack made only with small arms.[146]

His threat having been ignored, the governor of Canada acted on it by capturing the British traders among the Twightwees and taking them as prisoners to Presque Isle on Lake Erie, where he was building a strong fort. Around the same time, a route was established from Presque Isle, down French Creek, and the Allegheny River, to the Ohio. This route was maintained by groups of troops stationed at regular intervals, in places that could protect them from attacks using only small arms.[146]

1753

This territory having been granted as part of Virginia, to the Ohio company, who complained loudly of these aggressions, Dinwiddie, the lieutenant governor of that province, laid the subject before the assembly, and dispatched MAJOR WASHINGTON, the gentleman who afterwards led his countrymen to independence, with a letter to the commandant of the French forces on the Ohio; requiring him to withdraw from the dominions of his Britannic majesty.

This land was given as part of Virginia to the Ohio Company, which loudly protested these actions. Dinwiddie, the lieutenant governor of Virginia, brought this issue up with the assembly and sent Major Washington—the man who would later lead his fellow countrymen to independence—a letter to the French commander on the Ohio River, asking him to leave the territory that belonged to the British king.

This letter was delivered at a fort on the river Le Boeuf, the western branch of French creek, to Monsieur le Guarduer de St. Pierre, the commanding officer on the Ohio, who replied that he had taken possession of the country by the directions of his general, then in Canada, to whom he would transmit the letter of the lieutenant governor, and whose orders he should implicitly obey.

This letter was delivered at a fort on the Le Boeuf River, the western branch of French Creek, to Monsieur le Guarduer de St. Pierre, the commanding officer on the Ohio. He responded that he had taken control of the area on the orders of his general, who was in Canada, and that he would send the letter from the lieutenant governor to him and follow his instructions without question.

1754

Preparations were immediately made, in Virginia, to assert the rights of the British crown; and a regiment was raised for the protection of the frontiers. Early in the spring, Major Washington had advanced with a small detachment from this regiment into the country to be contended for, where he fell in with and defeated a party of French and Indians who were approaching him in a manner indicating hostile designs. On being joined by the residue of his regiment, the command of which had devolved on him, he made great exertions to pre-occupy the post at the confluence of the Alleghany and Monongahela rivers; but, on his march thither, was met by a much superior body of French and Indians, Defeat at the Little Meadows.who attacked him in a small stockade hastily erected at the Little Meadows, and compelled him, after a gallant defence to capitulate. The French had already taken possession of the ground to which Washington was proceeding, and, having driven off some militia, and workmen sent thither by the Ohio company, had erected thereon a strong fortification called fort Du Quêsne.

Immediately, preparations were made in Virginia to assert the rights of the British crown, and a regiment was raised to protect the frontiers. Early in the spring, Major Washington advanced with a small detachment from this regiment into the contested territory, where he encountered and defeated a group of French and Indians who approached him with hostile intentions. After being joined by the rest of his regiment, which had come under his command, he worked hard to take control of the site at the confluence of the Alleghany and Monongahela rivers. However, on his way there, he faced a much larger force of French and Indians, Defeat at Little Meadows. who attacked him at a small stockade hastily built at the Little Meadows, forcing him to surrender after a brave defense. The French had already taken over the area Washington was heading to, and after driving off some militiamen and workers sent by the Ohio company, they had built a strong fortification known as Fort Du Quêsne.

The earl of Holderness, secretary of state, perceiving war to be inevitable, and aware of the advantages of union, and of securing the friendship of the Five Nations, had written to the governors of the respective colonies recommending these essential objects; and, at the same time, ordering them to repel force by force; and to take effectual measures to dislodge the French from their posts on the Ohio.

The Earl of Holderness, the Secretary of State, realizing that war was unavoidable and recognizing the benefits of unity and securing the friendship of the Five Nations, had written to the governors of the various colonies suggesting these important goals. At the same time, he ordered them to respond to aggression with force and to take effective steps to remove the French from their positions on the Ohio.

Convention at Albany.

At the suggestion of the commissioners for the plantations, a convention of delegates from the several colonies met at Albany, to hold a conference with the Five Nations on the subject of French encroachments, and to secure their friendship in the approaching war. Availing himself of this circumstance governor Shirley had recommended to the other governors to instruct their commissioners on the subject of union. Ample powers for this object were given to the delegates of Massachusetts; and those of Maryland were instructed to observe what others should propose respecting it. But no direct authority for concerting any system to call out and employ the strength of the colonies, was given by any other of the governments.

At the suggestion of the commissioners for the plantations, a meeting of delegates from the various colonies took place in Albany to discuss French encroachments and to build a relationship with the Five Nations for the upcoming war. Taking advantage of this situation, Governor Shirley had advised the other governors to instruct their representatives on the matter of union. The delegates from Massachusetts were given broad powers for this purpose, while those from Maryland were directed to pay attention to what others would propose regarding it. However, no direct authority for coordinating any plan to mobilize and utilize the strength of the colonies was granted by any of the other governments.

The congress, consisting of delegates from New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, with the lieutenant governor and council of New York, after endeavouring to secure the friendship of the Five Nations by large presents, directed a committee, consisting of one member for each colony, to draw and report a plan of union.

The congress, made up of delegates from New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, Pennsylvania, and Maryland, along with the lieutenant governor and council of New York, tried to win the support of the Five Nations through generous gifts. They appointed a committee, with one member from each colony, to create and present a plan for unity.

Plan of union.

A plan[147] was reported which was approved on the 4th of July. Its essential principles were, that application be made for an act of parliament authorising the formation of a grand council to consist of delegates from the several legislatures, and a president general, to be appointed by the crown, and to be invested with a negative power. This council was to enact laws of general import; to apportion their quotas of men and money on the several colonies; to determine on the building of forts; to regulate the operations of armies; and to concert all measures for the common protection and safety.

A plan[147] was reported that received approval on July 4th. Its main ideas were to propose a law that would authorize the creation of a grand council made up of delegates from various legislatures, along with a president general who would be appointed by the crown and given the power to veto. This council was meant to create laws that affected everyone; allocate their shares of troops and funding across the colonies; decide on building forts; oversee army operations; and coordinate all actions for shared protection and safety.

The delegates of Connecticut alone dissented from this plan. That cautious people feared that the powers vested in the president general might prove dangerous to their welfare.

The delegates from Connecticut were the only ones who disagreed with this plan. Those cautious individuals worried that the authority given to the president general could be harmful to their well-being.

In England, the objections were of a different character. The colonies had, in several instances, manifested a temper less submissive than was required; and it was apprehended that this union might be the foundation of a concert of measures opposing the pretensions of supremacy maintained by the mother country.

In England, the objections were of a different nature. The colonies had, in several cases, shown a spirit less compliant than necessary; and there was concern that this union could lead to coordinated actions challenging the claims of authority put forth by the mother country.

This confederation, therefore, notwithstanding the pressure of external danger, did not prevail. It was not supported in America, because it was supposed to place too much power in the hands of the King; and it was rejected in England from the apprehension that the colonial assemblies would be rendered still more formidable by being accustomed to co-operate with each other.

This confederation, despite the risk of outside threats, did not succeed. It lacked support in America because people believed it gave too much power to the King; and it was turned down in England out of fear that colonial assemblies would become even more powerful by working together.

In its stead, the minister proposed that the governors, with one or two members of the councils of the respective provinces, should assemble to consult, and resolve on measures necessary for the common defence, and should draw on the British treasury for the sums to be expended, which sums should be afterwards raised by a general tax, to be imposed by parliament on the colonies.

Instead, the minister suggested that the governors, along with one or two members from the councils of their provinces, should come together to discuss and decide on the necessary measures for common defense. They should request funds from the British treasury for the expenses, which would later be covered by a general tax imposed by parliament on the colonies.

This proposition being entirely subversive of all the opinions which prevailed in America, was not pressed for the present; and no satisfactory plan for calling out the strength of the colonies being devised, it was determined to carry on the war with British troops, aided by such reinforcements as the several provincial assemblies would voluntarily afford.[148]

This idea completely went against all the beliefs that were common in America, so it wasn't pushed forward at that time. Since no effective plan was created to mobilize the colonies' strength, it was decided to continue the war using British troops, supported by whatever reinforcements the various provincial assemblies were willing to provide.[148]


CHAPTER XI.

General Braddock arrives.... Convention of governors and plan of the campaign.... French expelled from Nova Scotia, and inhabitants transplanted.... Expedition against fort Du Quêsne.... Battle of Monongahela.... Defeat and death of general Braddock.... Expedition against Crown Point.... Dieskau defeated.... Expedition against Niagara.... Frontiers distressed by the Indians.... Meeting of the governors at New York.... Plan for the campaign of 1756.... Lord Loudoun arrives.... Montcalm takes Oswego.... Lord Loudoun abandons offensive operations.... Small-pox breaks out in Albany.... Campaign of 1757 opened.... Admiral Holbourne arrives at Halifax.... Is joined by the earl of Loudoun.... Expedition against Louisbourg relinquished.... Lord Loudoun returns to New York.... Fort William Henry taken.... Controversy between lord Loudoun and the assembly of Massachusetts.

General Braddock arrives... a convention of governors and a campaign plan... the French are expelled from Nova Scotia, and the residents are moved... an expedition against Fort Duquesne... the Battle of Monongahela... the defeat and death of General Braddock... an expedition against Crown Point... Dieskau is defeated... an expedition against Niagara... the frontiers are suffering from Indian attacks... a meeting of the governors in New York... a plan for the 1756 campaign... Lord Loudoun arrives... Montcalm captures Oswego... Lord Loudoun halts offensive operations... smallpox breaks out in Albany... the 1757 campaign begins... Admiral Holbourne arrives in Halifax... he meets up with the Earl of Loudoun... the expedition against Louisbourg is called off... Lord Loudoun goes back to New York... Fort William Henry is captured... there is a dispute between Lord Loudoun and the Massachusetts Assembly.

 

1755

The establishment of the post on the Ohio, and the action at the Little Meadows, being considered by the British government as the commencement of war in America, the resolution to send a few regiments to that country was immediately taken; General Braddock.and early in the year, general Braddock embarked at Cork, at the head of a respectable body of troops destined for the colonies.

The establishment of the post on the Ohio and the action at the Little Meadows were seen by the British government as the start of war in America. A decision was quickly made to send a few regiments to that country; Gen. Braddock. Early in the year, General Braddock set out from Cork, leading a significant number of troops destined for the colonies.

An active offensive campaign being meditated, general Braddock convened the governors of the several provinces, on the 14th of April, in Virginia, who resolved to carry on three expeditions.

An active offensive campaign was being planned, so General Braddock brought together the governors of the various provinces on April 14th in Virginia, where they decided to launch three expeditions.

Plan of the campaign.

The first, and most important, was against fort Du Quêsne. This was to be conducted by general Braddock in person at the head of the British troops, with such aids as could be drawn from Maryland and Virginia.

The first and most important was against Fort Duquesne. General Braddock was to lead this personally at the head of the British troops, with additional support that could be gathered from Maryland and Virginia.

The second, against Niagara and fort Frontignac, was to be conducted by governor Shirley. The American regulars, consisting of Shirley and Pepperel's regiments, constituted the principal force destined for the reduction of these places.

The second, against Niagara and Fort Frontenac, was to be led by Governor Shirley. The American regulars, made up of Shirley's and Pepperell's regiments, formed the main force intended for the capture of these locations.

The third was against Crown Point. This originated with Massachusetts; and was to be prosecuted entirely with colonial troops, to be raised by the provinces of New England, and by New York. It was to be commanded by colonel William Johnson of the latter province.[149]

The third was against Crown Point. This started with Massachusetts and was to be carried out entirely with colonial troops, raised by the provinces of New England and New York. It was to be led by Colonel William Johnson from New York.[149]

While preparations were making for these several enterprises, an expedition, which had been previously concerted by the government of Massachusetts, was carried on against the French in Nova Scotia.

While preparations were being made for these various ventures, an expedition that had been planned earlier by the Massachusetts government was launched against the French in Nova Scotia.

It has been already stated that the limits of this province remained unsettled. While the commissioners of the two crowns were supporting the claims of their respective sovereigns in fruitless memorials, the French occupied the country in contest, and established military posts for its defence. Against these posts this enterprise was to be conducted.

It has already been mentioned that the boundaries of this province were still unclear. While the representatives of both crowns were backing the claims of their respective rulers in unproductive petitions, the French took control of the disputed land and set up military outposts for its defense. This effort was aimed at addressing those outposts.

On the 20th of May, the troops of Massachusetts, together with Shirley's and Pepperel's regiments, amounting in the whole to about three thousand men, embarked, at Boston, under the command of lieutenant colonel Winslow. The fleet anchored about five miles from fort Lawrence, where a reinforcement was received of three hundred British troops and a small train of artillery. The whole army, commanded by lieutenant colonel Monckton, immediately after landing, marched against Beau Sejour, the principal post held by the French in that country. At the river Mussaquack, which the French considered as the western boundary of Nova Scotia, some slight works had been thrown up with the intention of disputing its passage. After a short conflict, the river was passed with the loss of only one man; and, in five days, Beau Sejour capitulated. French expelled from Nova Scotia.Other small places fell in succession, and, in the course of the month of June, with the loss of only three men killed, the English acquired complete possession of the whole province of Nova Scotia.

On May 20th, the troops from Massachusetts, along with Shirley's and Pepperell's regiments, totaling about three thousand men, set sail from Boston under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Winslow. The fleet anchored about five miles from Fort Lawrence, where they received a reinforcement of three hundred British troops and a small artillery train. The entire army, led by Lieutenant Colonel Monckton, marched against Beau Sejour, the main fort held by the French in that region, right after landing. At the Mussaquack River, which the French saw as the western boundary of Nova Scotia, some minor defenses had been constructed to contest its crossing. After a brief skirmish, the river was crossed with only one casualty, and within five days, Beau Sejour surrendered. French kicked out of Nova Scotia. Other smaller locations fell in succession, and by the end of June, with just three men killed, the English had gained full control of the entire province of Nova Scotia.

The recovery of this province was followed by one of those distressing measures which involve individuals in indiscriminate ruin, and aggravate the calamities of war.

The recovery of this province was followed by one of those painful actions that drag people into unending chaos and make the hardships of war even worse.

Nova Scotia having been originally settled by France, its inhabitants were, chiefly, of that nation. In the treaty of Utrecht, it was stipulated for the colonists that they should be permitted to hold their lands on condition of taking the oaths of allegiance to their new sovereign. With this condition they refused to comply, unless permitted to qualify it with a proviso that they should not be required to bear arms in defence of the province. Though this qualification, to which the commanding officer of the British forces acceded, was afterwards disallowed by the crown, yet the French inhabitants continued to consider themselves as neutrals. Their devotion to France, however, would not permit them to conform their conduct to the character they had assumed. In all the contests for the possession of their country, they were influenced by their wishes rather than their duty; and three hundred of them were captured with the garrison of Beau Sejour.

Nova Scotia was originally settled by France, so its residents were mostly French. In the Treaty of Utrecht, it was agreed that the colonists could keep their land if they took an oath of loyalty to their new ruler. They refused to do this unless they could add a condition that they wouldn't have to fight to defend the province. Although the British commanding officer agreed to this condition, the crown later rejected it. Despite this, the French residents still saw themselves as neutral. However, their loyalty to France prevented them from acting in line with that neutral stance. In the various conflicts over their territory, they were driven more by their desires than by their obligations, and three hundred of them were captured along with the garrison of Beau Sejour.

Their continuance in the country, during the obstinate conflict which was commencing, would, it was feared, endanger the colony; and to expel them from it, leaving them at liberty to choose their place of residence, would be to reenforce the French in Canada. A council was held by the executive of Nova Scotia aided by the admirals Boscawen and Morty, for the purpose of deciding on the destiny of these unfortunate people; The inhabitants transported.and the severe policy was adopted of removing them from their homes, and dispersing them through the other British colonies. This harsh measure was immediately put in execution; and the miserable inhabitants of Nova Scotia were, in one instant, reduced from ease and contentment to a state of beggary. Their lands, and moveables, with the exception of their money and household furniture, were declared to be forfeited to the crown; and, to prevent their return, the country was laid waste, and their houses reduced to ashes.[150]

Their continued presence in the country during the stubborn conflict that was starting was feared to put the colony in danger; and removing them while allowing them to choose where to live would support the French in Canada. A council was held by the Nova Scotia executive, with the assistance of Admirals Boscawen and Morty, to decide the fate of these unfortunate people; The residents were relocated. and they decided on the harsh policy of removing them from their homes and spreading them across other British colonies. This severe action was quickly carried out, and the desperate residents of Nova Scotia went from comfort to destitution in an instant. Their lands and belongings, except for their money and household furniture, were declared forfeited to the crown; and to prevent them from returning, the land was devastated, and their houses were burned to the ground.[150]

As soon as the convention of governors had separated, general Braddock proceeded from Alexandria to a fort at Wills' creek, afterwards called fort Cumberland, at that time the most western post in Virginia or Maryland; from which place the army destined against fort Du Quêsne was to commence its march. The difficulties of obtaining wagons, and other necessary supplies for the expedition, and delays occasioned by opening a road through an excessively rough country, excited apprehensions that time would be afforded the enemy to collect in such force at fort Du Quêsne, as to put the success of the enterprise into some hazard.

As soon as the governors' convention ended, General Braddock left Alexandria and headed to a fort at Wills' Creek, later known as Fort Cumberland. At that time, it was the most western outpost in Virginia or Maryland, where the army set to march against Fort Du Quêsne would begin its journey. The challenges of securing wagons and other essential supplies for the mission, along with delays caused by clearing a path through a very rough area, raised concerns that the enemy would have enough time to gather a strong force at Fort Du Quêsne, putting the success of the operation at risk.

Under the influence of this consideration, it was determined to select twelve hundred men, who should be led by the general in person to the point of destination. The residue of the army, under the command of colonel Dunbar, was to follow, with the baggage, by slow and easy marches.

Under the impact of this idea, it was decided to choose twelve hundred men, who would be personally led by the general to the destination. The rest of the army, under Colonel Dunbar's command, would follow with the baggage, moving at a slow and easy pace.

This disposition being made, Braddock pressed forward to his object, in the confidence that he could find no enemy capable of opposing him; and reached the Monongahela on the eighth of July.

This arrangement being settled, Braddock moved ahead with his goal, confident that he wouldn’t encounter any enemies strong enough to resist him; he arrived at the Monongahela on July 8th.

As the army approached fort Du Quêsne, the general was cautioned of the danger to which the character of his enemy, and the face of the country, exposed him; and was advised to advance the provincial companies in his front, for the purpose of scouring the woods, and discovering ambuscades. But he held both his enemy and the provincials in too much contempt, to follow this salutary counsel. Three hundred British troops comprehending the grenadiers and light infantry, commanded by colonel Gage, composed his van; and he followed, at some distance, with the artillery, and the main body of the army, divided into small columns.

As the army got closer to Fort Du Quêsne, the general was warned about the risks posed by his enemy's tactics and the landscape. He was advised to send the local companies ahead to scout the woods and uncover any ambushes. However, he looked down on both his enemy and the local forces too much to heed this wise advice. His advance party consisted of three hundred British troops, including the grenadiers and light infantry, led by Colonel Gage. The general followed at a distance with the artillery and the main body of the army, which was divided into small groups.

Within seven miles of fort Du Quêsne, immediately after crossing the Monongahela the second time, in an open wood, thick set with high grass, as he was pressing forward without fear of danger, his front received an unexpected fire from an invisible enemy. Battle of Monongahela.The van was thrown into some confusion; but, the general having ordered up the main body, and the commanding officer of the enemy having fallen, the attack was suspended, and the assailants were supposed to be dispersed. This delusion was soon dissipated. The attack was renewed with increased fury; the van fell back on the main body; and the whole army was thrown into utter confusion.

Within seven miles of Fort Duquesne, right after crossing the Monongahela for the second time, in an open woods thick with tall grass, as he was moving forward without any fear, his front suddenly came under fire from an unseen enemy. Battle of the Monongahela. The front line was thrown into some disarray; but, after the general called in the main forces, and the enemy's commanding officer was killed, the attack stopped, and it was thought that the attackers had scattered. This belief was quickly proven wrong. The assault resumed with even greater intensity; the front line fell back to the main forces, and the entire army was thrown into complete chaos.

The general possessed personal courage in an eminent degree; but was without experience in that species of war, in which he was engaged; and seems not to have been endowed with that rare fertility of genius which adapts itself to the existing state of things, and invents expedients fitted to the emergency. In the impending crisis, he was peculiarly unfortunate in his choice of measures. Neither advancing nor retreating, he exerted his utmost powers to form his broken troops, under an incessant and galling fire, on the very ground where they had been attacked. In his fruitless efforts to restore order, every officer on horseback except Mr. Washington, one of his aides-de-camp, was killed or wounded. At length, after losing three horses, the general himself received a mortal wound; upon which his regulars fled in terror and confusion. Fortunately, the Indian enemy was arrested by the plunder found on the field, and the pursuit was soon given over. The provincials exhibited an unexpected degree of courage, and were among the last to leave the field.

The general had a high degree of personal bravery but lacked experience in the kind of warfare he was involved in. He didn’t seem to have that rare creativity that helps devise solutions suited to the current situation. In the looming crisis, he unfortunately chose poor strategies. Instead of advancing or retreating, he did everything he could to regroup his disorganized troops under constant and intense fire, right where they had been attacked. In his unsuccessful attempt to restore order, every officer on horseback except Mr. Washington, one of his aides-de-camp, was killed or injured. Eventually, after losing three horses, the general himself was fatally wounded, causing his regular troops to flee in fear and chaos. Luckily, the Indian enemy stopped in their tracks due to the loot found on the battlefield, and the chase quickly ended. The provincial soldiers showed an unexpected level of bravery and were among the last to leave the battlefield.

Death of Braddock.

The defeated troops fled precipitately to the camp of Dunbar, where Braddock expired of his wounds. Their panic was communicated to the residue of the army. As if affairs had become desperate, all the stores, except those necessary for immediate use, were destroyed; and the British troops were marched to Philadelphia, where they went into quarters. The western parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, were left exposed to the incursions of the savages; the frontier settlements were generally broken up; and the inhabitants were driven into the interior. So excessive was the alarm, that even the people of the interior entertained apprehensions for their safety, and many supposed that the seaboard itself was insecure.

The defeated troops fled quickly to the camp at Dunbar, where Braddock died from his injuries. Their panic spread to the rest of the army. As if the situation had become hopeless, all the supplies, except those needed for immediate use, were destroyed; and the British troops were marched to Philadelphia, where they settled in. The western parts of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia were left vulnerable to attacks by Native Americans; the frontier settlements were mostly abandoned; and the residents were forced to retreat into the interior. The fear was so overwhelming that even those in the interior worried for their safety, with many believing that the coast itself was unsafe.

The two northern expeditions, though not so disastrous as that against fort Du Quêsne, were neither of them successful. That against Crown Point was so retarded by those causes of delay to which military operations conducted by distinct governments are always exposed, that the army was not ready to move until the last of August. At length general Johnson reached the south end of lake George, on his way to Ticonderoga, of which he designed to take possession.

The two northern expeditions, while not as disastrous as the one against Fort Du Quêsne, were also unsuccessful. The mission against Crown Point faced so many delays, typical when military operations are led by different governments, that the army wasn’t ready to move until the end of August. Finally, General Johnson arrived at the southern end of Lake George, heading toward Ticonderoga, which he planned to capture.

An armament fitted out in the port of Brest for Canada, had eluded a British squadron which was stationed off the banks of Newfoundland to intercept it; and, with the loss of two ships of war, had entered the St. Lawrence. After arriving at Quebec the baron Dieskau, who commanded the French forces, resolved, without loss of time, to proceed against the English. At the head of about twelve hundred regulars, and about six hundred Canadians and Indians, he marched against Oswego. On hearing of this movement, general Johnson applied for reinforcements; and eight hundred men were ordered by Massachusetts to his assistance. An additional body of two thousand men was directed to be raised for the same object, and the neighbouring colonies also determined to furnish reinforcements.

An armament that was prepared in the port of Brest for Canada managed to slip past a British squadron stationed off the coast of Newfoundland to intercept it; and, with the loss of two warships, it entered the St. Lawrence. After reaching Quebec, Baron Dieskau, who led the French forces, decided to take action against the English without delay. Leading about twelve hundred regulars and around six hundred Canadians and Indians, he marched toward Oswego. Upon hearing of this movement, General Johnson requested reinforcements, and eight hundred men were ordered by Massachusetts to assist him. An additional force of two thousand men was also directed to be raised for the same purpose, and the neighboring colonies decided to provide reinforcements as well.

Dieskau did not wait for their arrival. Perceiving that Johnson was approaching lake George, and being informed that the provincials were without artillery, he determined to postpone his designs upon Oswego, and to attack them in their camp.

Dieskau didn’t wait for them to arrive. Realizing that Johnson was coming toward Lake George and hearing that the provincials had no artillery, he decided to put his plans for Oswego on hold and attack them in their camp.

On being informed that Dieskau was approaching, Johnson detached colonel Williams, with about one thousand men, to reconnoitre and skirmish with him. This officer met the French about four miles from the American camp, and immediately engaged them. He fell early in the action; and his party was soon overpowered and put to flight. Dieskau defeated.A second detachment, sent in aid of the first, experienced the same fate; and both were closely pursued to the main body, who were posted behind a breast-work of fallen trees. At this critical moment, within about one hundred and fifty yards of this work, the French halted for a short time. This interval having given the Americans an opportunity to recover from the first alarm, they determined on a resolute defence.

Upon hearing that Dieskau was coming, Johnson sent Colonel Williams and about a thousand men to scout and engage him. This officer encountered the French roughly four miles from the American camp and immediately got into a fight. He was killed early in the battle, and his group was soon overwhelmed and forced to retreat. Dieskau defeated.A second group sent to support the first faced the same fate, and both were closely chased back to the main force, which was positioned behind a barricade of fallen trees. At this critical moment, about one hundred and fifty yards from this barricade, the French paused for a brief period. This pause allowed the Americans to recover from their initial shock, and they decided to make a strong stand.

When the assailants advanced to the charge, they were received with firmness. The militia and savages fled; and Dieskau was under the necessity of ordering his regulars to retreat. A close and ardent pursuit ensued; and the general himself, being mortally wounded and left alone, was taken prisoner.

When the attackers charged, they were met with determination. The militia and the tribesmen ran away, and Dieskau had to order his regular troops to pull back. A fierce chase followed, and the general, having been mortally wounded and left behind, was captured.

During the engagement, a scouting party from fort Edward, under captains Folsom and McGennis, fell in with the baggage of the enemy and routed the guard which had been placed over it. Soon afterwards, the retreating army of Dieskau approached, and was gallantly attacked by the Americans. This unexpected attack from an enemy whose numbers were unknown, completed the confusion of the defeated army, which, abandoning its baggage, fled towards the posts on the lake.[151]

During the battle, a scouting team from Fort Edward, led by Captains Folsom and McGennis, came across the enemy's baggage and drove off the guard that was watching it. Soon after, the retreating army of Dieskau arrived and was bravely attacked by the Americans. This surprising assault from an unknown number of enemies intensified the chaos of the defeated army, which, leaving its baggage behind, ran toward the positions on the lake.[151]

The repulse of Dieskau, magnified into a splendid victory, had some tendency to remove the depression of spirits occasioned by the defeat of Braddock, and to inspire the provincials with more confidence in themselves. General Johnson, who was wounded in the engagement, received very solid testimonials of the gratitude and liberality of his country. Five thousand pounds sterling, and the title of baronet, were the rewards of his service.

The defeat of Dieskau, blown up into a major victory, helped lift the gloom that had come from Braddock's defeat and boosted the colonists' confidence in themselves. General Johnson, who was injured in the battle, received strong expressions of gratitude and generosity from his country. He was rewarded with five thousand pounds sterling and given the title of baronet for his service.

This success was not improved. The hopes and expectations of the public were not gratified; and the residue of the campaign was spent in fortifying the camp. Massachusetts pressed a winter campaign; but when her commissioners met those of Connecticut and the lieutenant governor and council of New York, it was unanimously agreed that the army under general Johnson should be discharged, except six hundred men to garrison fort Edward, on the great carrying place between the Hudson and lake George, and fort William Henry on that lake.

This success wasn't enhanced. The public's hopes and expectations weren't fulfilled, and the remaining time of the campaign was spent reinforcing the camp. Massachusetts pushed for a winter campaign, but when their representatives met with those from Connecticut and the lieutenant governor and council of New York, they all agreed that General Johnson's army should be sent home, except for six hundred men to guard Fort Edward, located at the key route between the Hudson and Lake George, and Fort William Henry on that lake.

The French took possession of Ticonderoga, and fortified it.

The French took control of Ticonderoga and reinforced it.

Expedition against Niagara.

The expedition against Niagara and fort Frontignac, was also defeated by delays in making the preparations necessary for its prosecution. Shirley did not reach Oswego till late in August. After ascertaining the state of the garrison, he determined to abandon that part of the enterprise which respected fort Frontignac, and to proceed against Niagara. While employed in the embarkation of his troops on the lake, the rains set in with such violence as to suspend his operations until the season was so far advanced that the attempt against Niagara was also relinquished, and Shirley returned to Albany.[152]

The mission against Niagara and Fort Frontenac also fell through due to delays in preparing for it. Shirley didn’t arrive in Oswego until late August. After checking on the garrison, he decided to abandon the part of the plan concerning Fort Frontenac and proceed with the attack on Niagara. While he was loading his troops onto the lake, heavy rains began, halting his operations until the season was too far along for him to continue, leading him to give up on the Niagara attempt and return to Albany.[152]

Thus terminated the campaign of 1755. It opened with so decided a superiority of force on the part of the English, as to promise the most important advantages. But, if we except the expulsion of the French from Nova Scotia, no single enterprise was crowned with success. Great exertions were made by the northern colonies, but their efforts were productive of no benefit. From the want of one general superintending authority in their councils, which could contemplate and control the different parts of the system, which could combine all their operations, and direct them with effect towards the attainment of the object pursued, every thing failed. Such delays and deficiencies were experienced that, though a considerable force was in motion, it could not be brought to the point against which it was to act, until the season for action was over; nor execute the plans which were concerted until the opportunity had passed away.

Thus ended the campaign of 1755. It began with such a clear superiority of force from the English that it promised significant advantages. However, aside from the expulsion of the French from Nova Scotia, no single effort resulted in success. The northern colonies made great efforts, but their attempts yielded no benefits. The lack of a single, overarching authority in their councils, which could oversee and manage the different parts of their strategy, combine all their operations, and effectively direct them towards their goal, led to failures. They faced so many delays and shortcomings that, even though a considerable force was in motion, it could not be deployed against the targets in time, and could not execute the planned strategies before the opportunity had passed.

 

General Braddock's Grave

General Braddock's Grave

General Braddock's Grave

General Braddock's Grave

Showing the monument recently erected

Revealing the recently erected monument

It is not generally appreciated that this British commander was chosen to head the expedition to destroy the French power in America, in 1754-5, because of his distinguished army record. In the Battle of Fontency, for instance, he was colonel in command of the famous Coldstream Guards, who covered themselves with glory; and shortly before embarking for America he was made major-general of the line. Braddock had won his promotion solely through gallantry and at a time when a lieutenant-colonelcy in this crack British regiment sold for £5000 Sterling.

It’s not commonly recognized that this British commander was selected to lead the mission to eliminate French influence in America in 1754-5 due to his outstanding military background. For example, in the Battle of Fontenoy, he served as colonel in charge of the renowned Coldstream Guards, who achieved great honor; and just before heading to America, he was promoted to major-general. Braddock earned his advancement purely through bravery at a time when a lieutenant-colonel position in this elite British regiment cost £5000 Sterling.

Despite his fatal mistake in not heeding the advice of his aide, Washington, in conducting his expedition against Fort Duquesne (Pittsburgh), Braddock regarded Washington and Franklin as the greatest men in the colonies. Meeting the French and Indians on July 9, 1755, the British were routed and Braddock was fatally wounded, after having four horses shot under him. Dying four days later at Great Meadows, where he is buried, he bequeathed his favorite surviving horse and body servant to Washington, then a colonel.

Even though he made a crucial mistake by ignoring his aide’s advice, Washington, while leading his expedition against Fort Duquesne (Pittsburgh), was seen by Braddock as one of the greatest figures in the colonies, along with Franklin. When the British faced the French and Indians on July 9, 1755, they were defeated, and Braddock was severely wounded after having four horses shot from under him. He died four days later at Great Meadows, where he is buried, leaving his favorite surviving horse and personal servant to Washington, who was then a colonel.

 

The system adopted by the British cabinet, for conducting the war in America, left to the colonial governments to determine, what number of men each should bring into the field; but required them to support their own troops, and to contribute to the support of those sent from Great Britain to their assistance. But this system could not be enforced. The requisitions of the minister were adopted, rejected, or modified, at the discretion of the government on which they were made; and, as no rule of apportionment had been adopted, each colony was inclined to consider itself as having contributed more than its equal share towards the general object, and as having received, less than its just proportion, of the attention and protection of the mother country. This temper produced a slow and reluctant compliance on the part of some, which enfeebled and disconcerted enterprises, for the execution of which the resources of several were to be combined.

The approach taken by the British cabinet for waging war in America allowed the colonial governments to decide how many soldiers each should send into battle. However, it required them to fund their own troops and also help support the troops sent from Great Britain to assist them. But this system couldn’t be enforced. The minister's requests were either accepted, rejected, or altered at the discretion of the local government. Since no clear method for dividing responsibilities was established, each colony tended to believe it had contributed more than its fair share toward the overall effort while receiving less than its fair share of attention and protection from the mother country. This attitude led to slow and unwilling compliance from some, which weakened and complicated operations that depended on pooling the resources of multiple colonies.

Distress of the frontiers.

In the mean time the whole frontier, as far as North Carolina, was exposed to the depredations of the savages, who were, almost universally, under the influence of the French. Their bloody incursions were made in all directions, and many settlements were entirely broken up.

In the meantime, the entire frontier, all the way to North Carolina, was vulnerable to attacks from the Native Americans, who were mostly influenced by the French. Their violent raids happened in every direction, and many communities were completely destroyed.

It is a curious and singular fact that, while hostilities were thus carried on by France and England against each other in America, the relations of peace and amity were preserved between them in Europe. Each nation had, in consequence of the military operations in 1754, determined to fit out a considerable armament to aid the efforts made in its colonies; and, when it was understood that admiral Boscawen was ordered to intercept that of France, the Duc de Mirepoix, the French ambassador at London, complained of the proposed measure, and gave formal notice that the King his master would consider the first gun fired at sea, as a declaration of war. On receiving intelligence of the capture of a part of the squadron by Boscawen, the French minister at the court of St. James was recalled without asking an audience of leave; upon which, letters of marque and reprisal were issued by the British government. This prompt and vigorous measure had much influence on the war, which was declared, in form, the following spring.

It's a strange and unique fact that, while France and England were fighting each other in America, they managed to maintain peaceful relations in Europe. After military actions began in 1754, both nations decided to assemble significant forces to support their efforts in their colonies. When it became known that Admiral Boscawen was instructed to intercept the French fleet, the Duc de Mirepoix, the French ambassador in London, protested the plan and formally warned that his king would view the first shot fired at sea as a declaration of war. Upon learning that part of the squadron had been captured by Boscawen, the French minister at St. James's was recalled without requesting an audience; as a result, the British government issued letters of marque and reprisal. This swift and decisive action significantly impacted the war, which was officially declared the following spring.

General Shirley, on his return to Albany after the close of the campaign in 1755, received a commission appointing him commander in chief of the King's forces in North America. A meeting of all the governors was immediately called at New York, for the purpose of concerting a plan for the ensuing campaign. Operations equally extensive with those proposed for the preceding campaign were again contemplated. To ensure their success, it was determined to raise ten thousand men, for the expedition against Crown Point; six thousand, for that against Niagara; and three thousand, for that against fort Du Quêsne. To favour the operations of this formidable force, it was farther determined that two thousand men should advance up the Kennebec, destroy the settlement on the Chaudière, and, descending to the mouth of that river, keep all that part of Canada in alarm.

General Shirley, upon returning to Albany after the end of the 1755 campaign, received a commission appointing him commander in chief of the King's forces in North America. A meeting of all the governors was quickly called in New York to plan for the upcoming campaign. They were considering operations as extensive as those planned for the previous campaign. To ensure their success, they decided to raise ten thousand men for the mission against Crown Point; six thousand for Niagara; and three thousand for fort Du Quêsne. To support this powerful force, they also decided that two thousand men would advance up the Kennebec, destroy the settlement on the Chaudière, and, after descending to the mouth of that river, keep the entire area of Canada on edge.

In the mean time, it was proposed to take advantage of the season when the lake should be frozen, to seize Ticonderoga, in order to facilitate the enterprise against Crown Point. This project was defeated by the unusual mildness of the winter; and, about the middle of January, general Shirley repaired to Boston in order to make the necessary preparations for the ensuing campaign.

In the meantime, it was suggested to take advantage of the season when the lake would be frozen to capture Ticonderoga, so as to make it easier to go after Crown Point. This plan was thwarted by the unexpectedly mild winter; and around mid-January, General Shirley went to Boston to prepare for the upcoming campaign.

Such was the solicitude to accomplish the objects in contemplation, and so deep an interest did the colonists take in the war, that every nerve was strained, to raise and equip the number of men required.

Such was the eagerness to achieve the goals in mind, and the colonists were so invested in the war that every effort was made to recruit and equip the necessary number of men.

1756
Command bestowed on Lord Loudoun.

Having made in Massachusetts all the preparations for the next campaign, so far as depended on the government, Shirley repaired to Albany, where he was superseded[153] by major general Abercrombie; who, soon afterwards, yielded the command to the earl of Loudoun. Early in the year, that nobleman had been appointed to the command of all his majesty's forces in North America; and extensive powers, civil as well as military, had been conferred on him. But he did not arrive at Albany until midsummer.

Having completed all the preparations for the next campaign in Massachusetts, as far as the government was concerned, Shirley went to Albany, where he was replaced by Major General Abercrombie; who, shortly after, handed over the command to the Earl of Loudoun. Early in the year, that nobleman had been appointed to lead all of His Majesty's forces in North America and was given extensive civil and military powers. However, he didn’t arrive in Albany until midsummer.

In the spring, the provincial troops destined for the expedition against Crown Point, were assembled in the neighbourhood of lake George. They were found not much to exceed seven thousand men; and even this number was to be reduced in order to garrison posts in the rear. This army being too weak to accomplish its object, major general Winslow, who commanded it, declared himself unable to proceed on the expedition without reinforcements. The arrival of a body of British troops, with general Abercrombie, removed this difficulty; but another occurred which still farther suspended the enterprise.

In the spring, the provincial troops gathered for the mission against Crown Point were assembled near Lake George. They numbered just over seven thousand men, and this total would be reduced to secure posts in the rear. This army was too weak to achieve its goal, so Major General Winslow, who was in charge, said he couldn’t continue with the expedition without reinforcements. The arrival of a group of British troops led by General Abercrombie solved that problem, but another issue arose that further delayed the mission.

The regulations respecting rank had given great disgust in America; and had rendered it disagreeable and difficult to carry on any military operations which required a junction of British and provincial troops. When consulted on this delicate subject, Winslow assured general Abercrombie of his apprehensions that, if the result of the junction should be to place the provincial troops under British officers, it would produce general discontent, and perhaps desertion. His officers concurred in this opinion; and it was finally agreed that British troops should succeed the provincials in the posts then occupied by them, so as to enable the whole colonial force to proceed under Winslow, against Crown Point.

The rules about rank had caused a lot of frustration in America and made it tough to carry out military operations that needed a combined effort from British and provincial troops. When asked about this sensitive issue, Winslow expressed to General Abercrombie his fear that if the result of the merger meant putting provincial troops under British officers, it would lead to widespread dissatisfaction and possibly desertion. His officers agreed with this view, and it was ultimately decided that British troops would replace the provincials in their current positions, allowing the entire colonial force to move under Winslow’s command towards Crown Point.

On the arrival of the earl of Loudoun, this subject was revived. The question was seriously propounded, "whether the troops in the several colonies of New England, armed with his majesty's arms, would, in obedience to his commands signified to them, act in conjunction with his European troops; and under the command of his commander in chief?" The colonial officers answered this question in the affirmative; but entreated it as a favour of his lordship, as the New England troops had been raised on particular terms, that he would permit them, so far as might consist with his majesty's service, to act separately. This request was acceded to; but before the army could be put in motion, the attention both of the Europeans and provincials, was directed to their own defence.

Upon the arrival of the Earl of Loudoun, this topic came up again. The question was raised seriously: "Will the troops in the various New England colonies, armed with the king's weapons, follow his orders and work together with his European troops, under the leadership of his commander in chief?" The colonial officers answered yes, but kindly asked his lordship to allow them, as much as possible for the king's service, to operate separately since the New England troops had been recruited under specific conditions. This request was granted; however, before the army could mobilize, both the Europeans and the provincial forces focused on their own defense.

Montcalm takes Oswego.

Monsieur de Montcalm, an able officer, who succeeded Dieskau in the command of the French troops in Canada, sought to compensate by superior activity, for the inferiority of his force. While the British and Americans were adjusting their difficulties respecting rank, and deliberating whether to attack Niagara or fort Du Quêsne, Montcalm advanced at the head of about five thousand Europeans, Canadians, and Indians, against Oswego. In three days he brought up his artillery, and opened a battery which played on the fort with considerable effect. Colonel Mercer, the commanding officer, was killed; and, in a few hours, the place was declared by the engineers to be no longer tenable. The garrison, consisting of the regiments of Shirley and Pepperel, amounting to sixteen hundred men, supplied with provisions for five months, capitulated, and became prisoners of war. A respectable naval armament, then on the lake, was also captured.

Monsieur de Montcalm, a skilled officer who took over from Dieskau in leading the French troops in Canada, tried to make up for his smaller force with greater activity. While the British and Americans were sorting out their ranking issues and debating whether to attack Niagara or Fort Du Quêsne, Montcalm marched with around five thousand Europeans, Canadians, and Indians toward Oswego. In just three days, he brought in his artillery and set up a battery that effectively targeted the fort. Colonel Mercer, the commanding officer, was killed, and within hours, engineers declared the fort no longer defensible. The garrison, which included the Shirley and Pepperel regiments comprising sixteen hundred men, well-stocked with five months' worth of supplies, surrendered and became prisoners of war. A significant naval force present on the lake was also captured.

The fort at Oswego had been erected in the country of the Five Nations, and had been viewed by them with some degree of jealousy. Montcalm, actuated by a wise policy, destroyed it in their presence; declaring at the same time, that the French wished only to enable them to preserve their neutrality, and would, therefore, make no other use of the rights of conquest, than to demolish the fortresses which the English had erected in their country to overawe them.

The fort at Oswego was built in the territory of the Five Nations, and they looked at it with some jealousy. Montcalm, following a smart strategy, destroyed it in front of them; stating at the same time that the French only wanted to help them maintain their neutrality and would not use their conquest rights for anything else but to tear down the forts the English had built in their land to intimidate them.

The British general, disconcerted at this untoward event, abandoned all his plans of offensive operations. General Winslow was ordered to relinquish his intended expedition, and to fortify his camp, and endeavour to prevent the enemy from penetrating into the country by the way of South bay, or Wood creek. Major general Webb, with fourteen hundred men, was posted at the great carrying place; and, to secure his rear, sir William Johnson, with one thousand militia, was stationed at the German flats.

The British general, upset by this unexpected event, scrapped all his plans for offensive operations. General Winslow was ordered to cancel his planned expedition, fortify his camp, and try to stop the enemy from advancing into the country through South Bay or Wood Creek. Major General Webb, with fourteen hundred men, was positioned at the Great Carrying Place; to protect his rear, Sir William Johnson, with one thousand militia, was stationed at the German Flats.

These dispositions being made, the colonies were strenuously urged to reinforce the army. It was represented to them that, should any disaster befall Winslow, the enemy might be enabled to overrun the country, unless opposed by a force much superior to that in the field.[154]

These arrangements being made, the colonies were strongly encouraged to support the army. It was pointed out to them that if anything happened to Winslow, the enemy could take over the country unless there was a much larger force to oppose them. [154]

Small-pox in Albany.

During this state of apprehensive inactivity, the small-pox broke out in Albany. This enemy was more dreaded by the provincials than Montcalm himself. So great was the alarm, that it was found necessary to garrison the posts in that quarter, entirely with British troops, and to discharge all the provincials except a regiment raised in New York.

During this uneasy period of inaction, smallpox broke out in Albany. The locals feared this disease more than Montcalm himself. The alarm was so severe that it became necessary to station only British troops in that area and to dismiss all the local militia except for one regiment formed in New York.

Thus terminated for a second time, in defeat and utter disappointment, the sanguine hopes which the colonists had formed of a brilliant and successful campaign. After all their expensive and laborious preparations, not an effort had been made to drive the invaders of the country even from their out-post at Ticonderoga.

Thus ended for the second time, in defeat and complete disappointment, the hopeful expectations that the colonists had about a successful and victorious campaign. After all their costly and hard work, no effort was made to drive the invaders out of the country, even from their outpost at Ticonderoga.

The expedition to lake Ontario had not been commenced; and no preparations had been made for that against fort Du Quêsne. The colonies of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, far from contemplating offensive operations, had been unable to defend themselves; and their frontiers were exposed to all the horrors of Indian warfare.

The trip to Lake Ontario hadn't started yet, and no plans had been made for an attack on Fort Du Quesne. The colonies of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, instead of planning offensive actions, had been struggling to defend themselves, leaving their borders open to the brutalities of Indian warfare.

The expedition up the Kennebec was also abandoned. Thus, no one enterprise contemplated at the opening of the campaign, was carried into execution.[155]

The trip up the Kennebec was also called off. So, none of the plans considered at the start of the campaign were put into action.[155]

1757

About the middle of January, the governors of the northern provinces were convened in a military council at Boston. The earl of Loudoun opened his propositions to them with a speech in which he attributed all the disasters that had been sustained, to the colonies; and in which he proposed that New England should raise four thousand men for the ensuing campaign. Requisitions proportionably large were also made on New York and New Jersey.

About the middle of January, the governors of the northern provinces gathered for a military council in Boston. The Earl of Loudoun began with a speech where he blamed all the disasters they had faced on the colonies. He proposed that New England should enlist four thousand men for the upcoming campaign. Similar large requests were also made to New York and New Jersey.

Campaign of 1757.

The ill success which had, thus far, attended the combined arms of Great Britain and her colonies, did not discourage them. Their exertions to bring a powerful force into the field were repeated; and the winter was employed in preparations for the ensuing campaign. The requisitions of lord Loudoun were complied with; and he found himself, in the spring, at the head of a respectable army. Some important enterprise against Canada, when the armament expected from Europe should arrive, was eagerly anticipated; and the most sanguine hopes of success were again entertained.

The lack of success that the combined forces of Great Britain and her colonies had experienced so far did not discourage them. They worked hard to mobilize a strong force for battle, and the winter was spent preparing for the upcoming campaign. They complied with Lord Loudoun's requests, and by spring, he found himself leading a significant army. They eagerly anticipated a major operation against Canada when the reinforcements from Europe arrived, and there were once again high hopes for success.

Admiral Holbourne arrives. Is joined by Lord Loudoun.

In the beginning of July, Admiral Holbourne reached Halifax with a powerful squadron, and reinforcement of five thousand British troops commanded by George Viscount Howe, and, on the 6th of the same month, the earl of Loudoun sailed from New York with six thousand regulars. A junction of these formidable armaments was effected without opposition, and the Loudoun colonists looked forward with confidence for a decisive blow which would shake the power of France in America.

In early July, Admiral Holbourne arrived in Halifax with a strong fleet and an additional five thousand British troops led by George Viscount Howe. On the 6th of that month, Earl of Loudoun set sail from New York with six thousand regular soldiers. The merging of these powerful forces happened without any resistance, and the Loudoun colonists were hopeful for a major strike that would weaken France's power in America.

The expedition against Louisbourg relinquished.

The plan of this campaign varied from that which had been adopted in the preceding years. The vast and complex movements heretofore proposed, were no longer contemplated, and offensive operations were to be confined to a single object. Leaving the posts on the lakes strongly garrisoned, the British general determined to direct his whole disposable force against Louisbourg; and fixed on Halifax as the place of rendezvous for the fleet and army.

The strategy for this campaign was different from what had been used in previous years. The large and complicated movements planned before were no longer being considered, and offensive actions would be focused on one main goal. After ensuring that the posts on the lakes were well defended, the British general decided to concentrate all available troops on Louisbourg and chose Halifax as the meeting point for the fleet and army.

After assembling the land and naval forces at this place, information was received that a fleet had lately arrived from France, and that Louisbourg was so powerfully defended as to render any attempt upon it hopeless. In consequence of this intelligence the enterprise was deferred until the next year; the general and admiral returned to New York in August; and the provincials were dismissed.

After bringing together the land and naval forces at this location, it was reported that a fleet had recently arrived from France, and that Louisbourg was so well defended that any attempt to attack it would be pointless. Because of this news, the plan was postponed until the following year; the general and admiral went back to New York in August, and the provincial troops were released.

The French general, feeling no apprehension for Louisbourg, determined to avail himself of the absence of a large part of the British force, and to obtain complete possession of lake George. With an army collected chiefly from the garrisons of Crown Point, Ticonderoga, and the adjacent forts; amounting, with the addition of Indians, and Canadians, to nine thousand men, the marquis de Montcalm laid siege to fort William Henry. That place was well fortified, and garrisoned by three thousand men; and derived additional security from an army of four thousand men at fort Edwards, under the command of major general Webb. Fort William Henry taken.Notwithstanding the strength of the place and its means of defence, Montcalm urged his approaches with so much vigour, that articles of capitulation, surrendering the fort, artillery, and stores, and stipulating that the garrison should not serve against his Most Christian Majesty or his allies for the space of eighteen months, were signed within six days after its investment.

The French general, feeling no concern for Louisbourg, decided to take advantage of the absence of a significant portion of the British forces and to gain full control of Lake George. With an army made up mainly of troops from the garrisons at Crown Point, Ticonderoga, and nearby forts—totaling, along with Indigenous people and Canadians, nine thousand men—Marquis de Montcalm laid siege to Fort William Henry. This fort was well fortified and had a garrison of three thousand men, along with added protection from an army of four thousand men at Fort Edwards, commanded by Major General Webb. Fort William Henry captured. Despite the fort's strength and defensive capabilities, Montcalm pressed forward so aggressively that articles of capitulation, surrendering the fort, artillery, and supplies, and stipulating that the garrison would not fight against his Most Christian Majesty or his allies for eighteen months, were signed within six days of the siege beginning.

When this important place was surrendered, the commander in chief had not returned from Halifax. General Webb, alarmed for fort Edward, applied for reinforcements; and the utmost exertions were made to furnish the aids he required. The return of the army to New York on the last of August, dispelled all fear of an invasion, and enabled the general, who contemplated no farther active operations, to dismiss the provincials.

When this key location was given up, the commander in chief hadn’t come back from Halifax. General Webb, worried about Fort Edward, asked for more troops; and every effort was made to provide the support he needed. The army's return to New York at the end of August eased all concerns about an invasion and allowed the general, who wasn’t planning any further active missions, to release the provincial troops.

Unsuccessful in all his attempts to gather laurels from the common enemy, the earl of Loudoun engaged in a controversy with Massachusetts; in the commencement of which, he displayed a degree of vigour which had been kept in reserve for two campaigns. This controversy is thus stated by Mr. Minot.

Unsuccessful in all his attempts to gain recognition from the common enemy, the Earl of Loudoun got into a dispute with Massachusetts; at the start of this, he showed a level of energy that had been held back for two campaigns. Mr. Minot states this controversy as follows.

Upon information from the governor that a regiment of Highlanders was expected in Boston, the general court provided barracks for the accommodation of one thousand men at Castle Island. Soon afterwards, several officers arrived from Nova Scotia to recruit their regiments. Finding it impracticable to perform this service while in the barracks at the castle, they applied to the justices of the peace to quarter and billet them, as provided by act of parliament. The justices refused to grant this request, on the principle that the act did not extend to the colonies. When informed of this refusal, lord Loudoun addressed a letter to the justices, insisting peremptorily on the right, as the act did, in his opinion, extend to America, and to every part of the King's dominions, where the necessities of the people should oblige him to send his troops. He concluded a long dissertation on the question in the following decisive terms, "that having used gentleness and patience, and confuted their arguments, without effect, they having returned to their first mistaken plan, their not complying would lay him under the necessity of taking measures to prevent the whole continent from being thrown into a state of confusion. As nothing was wanting to set things right, but the justices doing their duty (for no act of the assembly was necessary or wanting for it) he had ordered the messenger to remain only forty-eight hours in Boston; and if on his return he found things not settled, he would instantly order into Boston the three battalions from New York, Long Island, and Connecticut; and if more were wanting, he had two in the Jerseys at hand, besides those in Pennsylvania. As public business obliged him to take another route, he had no more time left to settle this material affair, and must take the necessary steps before his departure, in case they were not done by themselves."

Upon learning from the governor that a regiment of Highlanders was expected in Boston, the general court arranged for barracks to accommodate one thousand men at Castle Island. Shortly after, several officers arrived from Nova Scotia to recruit for their regiments. Realizing it was impractical to carry out this task while in the barracks at the castle, they asked the justices of the peace to provide housing for them as required by an act of parliament. The justices denied this request, arguing that the act did not apply to the colonies. When lord Loudoun was informed of this refusal, he sent a letter to the justices, firmly insisting on his right, as he believed the act did apply to America and to every part of the King's territory where the local needs required him to send his troops. He concluded a lengthy discussion on the matter with the following assertive statement: "Having tried gentleness and patience, and having countered their arguments to no avail, their return to their original mistaken stance means that their failure to comply would force me to take steps to prevent the entire continent from descending into chaos. Since there was nothing preventing a resolution except the justices fulfilling their duty (no act of the assembly was necessary for this), I instructed the messenger to stay in Boston for only forty-eight hours; if upon his return he found the situation unresolved, I would immediately send the three battalions from New York, Long Island, and Connecticut to Boston; and if more were needed, I had two more in New Jersey available, in addition to those in Pennsylvania. Due to public business requiring me to take a different route, I had no additional time to settle this important issue and must take the necessary actions before my departure, in case they were not resolved by themselves."

The general court passed a law for the purpose of removing the inconveniences of which the officers complained; but, this law not equalling the expectations of lord Loudoun, he communicated his dissatisfaction in a letter to the governor, which was laid before the assembly, who answered by an address to his excellency in which the spirit of their forefathers seemed to revive. They again asserted that the act of parliament did not extend to the colonies; and that they had for this reason enlarged the barracks at the castle, and passed a law for the benefit of recruiting parties, as near the act of parliament as the circumstances of the country would admit; that such a law was necessary to give power to the magistrates, and they were willing to make it, whenever his majesty's troops were necessary for their defence. They asserted their natural rights as Englishmen; that by the royal charter, the powers and privileges of civil government were granted to them; that their enjoyment of these was their support under all burdens, and would animate them to resist an invading enemy to the last. If their adherence to their rights and privileges should, in any measure, lessen the esteem which his lordship had conceived for them, it would be their great misfortune; but that they would have the satisfaction of reflecting that, both in their words and actions, they had been governed by a sense of duty to his majesty, and faithfulness to the trust committed to them.

The general court passed a law to address the issues that the officers complained about; however, this law didn’t meet Lord Loudoun’s expectations, and he expressed his dissatisfaction in a letter to the governor, which was presented to the assembly. They responded with an address to his excellency that seemed to bring back the spirit of their forefathers. They reiterated that the act of parliament did not apply to the colonies, and for this reason, they expanded the barracks at the castle and passed a law to assist recruiting parties, as close to the act of parliament as the situation in the country allowed. They stated that such a law was necessary to empower the magistrates and that they were willing to establish it whenever His Majesty's troops were needed for their defense. They asserted their natural rights as Englishmen, noting that the royal charter granted them the powers and privileges of civil government; that their enjoyment of these rights supported them under all burdens and motivated them to resist an invading enemy to the end. If their commitment to their rights and privileges in any way diminished the esteem that Lord Loudoun had for them, it would be their great misfortune; but they would find satisfaction in knowing that, in both their words and actions, they were guided by a sense of duty to His Majesty and loyalty to the trust placed in them.

This address being forwarded to lord Loudoun, he affected to rely on their removing all difficulties in future, and not only countermanded the march of the troops, but condescended to make some conciliatory observations respecting the zeal of the province in his majesty's service. For these the two houses made an ample return in a message to the governor, in which they disavowed any intention of lessening their dependence on parliament; and expressly acknowledged the authority of all acts which concerned, and extended to, the colonies.

This message was sent to Lord Loudoun, who pretended to trust that they would resolve all issues moving forward. He not only called off the troop's march but also took the time to make some friendly remarks about the province's dedication to the king's service. In response, the two houses sent a detailed message to the governor, in which they denied any intention of reducing their reliance on Parliament and explicitly acknowledged the authority of all laws that affected and applied to the colonies.

This explicit avowal of sentiments so different from those which Massachusetts had long cherished respecting her connexion with the mother country, would induce a belief that she had recently become more colonial in her opinions. This was probably the fact; but Mr. Minot, who may be presumed to have been personally acquainted with the transaction, does not attribute to that cause entirely, the conciliating temper manifested at the close of a contest, which had commenced with such appearances of asperity. Massachusetts had made large advances for the prosecution of the war, for which she expected reimbursements from parliament; and was not willing, at such a juncture, to make impressions unfavorable to the success of her claims.

This open declaration of feelings that were so different from what Massachusetts had traditionally held regarding her connection to the mother country would lead one to believe that she had recently become more colonial in her views. This was probably true; however, Mr. Minot, who likely had personal knowledge of the situation, does not completely attribute the friendly attitude shown at the end of a conflict that started with such hostility to this reason. Massachusetts had invested heavily in the war and expected reimbursements from parliament, and she wasn't willing to jeopardize her claims at such a critical moment.


CHAPTER XII.

Preparations for the campaign of 1758.... Admiral Boscawen and general Amherst arrive at Halifax.... Plan of the campaign.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie repulsed under the walls of Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontignac taken.... Expedition against fort Du Quêsne.... Preparations for the campaign of 1759.... General Amherst succeeds general Abercrombie.... Plan of the campaign.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point taken.... Army goes into winter quarters.... French repulsed at Oswego.... Defeated at Niagara.... Niagara taken.... Expedition against Quebec.... Check to the English army.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Death of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec capitulates.... Garrisoned by the English under the command of general Murray.... Attempt to recover Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec besieged by Monsieur Levi.... Siege raised.... Montreal capitulates.... War with the southern Indians.... Battle near the town of Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... Success of the English.... Peace.

Preparations for the 1758 campaign.... Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive in Halifax.... Campaign plan.... Expedition against Louisbourg, Ticonderoga, and Crown Point.... General Abercrombie is pushed back at Ticonderoga.... Fort Frontenac captured.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Preparations for the 1759 campaign.... General Amherst takes over from General Abercrombie.... Campaign plan.... Ticonderoga and Crown Point captured.... Army settles in for winter.... French pushed back at Oswego.... Defeated at Niagara.... Niagara captured.... Expedition against Quebec.... Setback for the English army.... Battle on the Plains of Abraham.... Death of Wolfe and Montcalm.... Quebec surrenders.... Garrisoned by the English under General Murray.... Attempt to regain Quebec.... Battle near Sillery.... Quebec besieged by Monsieur Lévis.... Siege lifted.... Montreal surrenders.... War with the southern Indians.... Battle near the town of Etchoe.... Grant defeats them and burns their towns.... Treaty with the Cherokees.... War with Spain.... Success for the English.... Peace.

 

1758

The affairs of Great Britain in North America wore a more gloomy aspect, at the close of the campaign of 1757, than at any former period. By the acquisition of fort William Henry, the French had obtained complete possession of the lakes Champlain and George. By the destruction of Oswego, they had acquired the dominion of those lakes which connect the St. Lawrence with the waters of the Mississippi, and unite Canada to Louisiana. By means of fort Du Quêsne, they maintained their ascendency over the Indians, and held undisturbed possession of the country west of the Allegheny mountains; while the English settlers were driven to the Blue Ridge. The great object of the war in that quarter was gained, and France held the country for which hostilities had been commenced. With inferior numbers, the French had been victorious in every campaign, and had uniformly gained ground on the English colonies. Nor were they less successful elsewhere. The flame of war which was kindled in America, had communicated itself to Europe and Asia. In every quarter of the world where hostilities had been carried on, the British arms were attended with defeat and disgrace.

The situation for Great Britain in North America was gloomier at the end of the 1757 campaign than ever before. With the capture of Fort William Henry, the French had full control of Lake Champlain and Lake George. The destruction of Oswego allowed them to dominate the lakes connecting the St. Lawrence with the Mississippi River, linking Canada to Louisiana. Through Fort Duquesne, they maintained their influence over the Native Americans and retained control of the land west of the Allegheny Mountains, while English settlers were pushed back to the Blue Ridge. The main goal of the war in that region had been achieved, with France controlling the territory that sparked the conflict. Despite being outnumbered, the French had won every campaign and consistently gained ground against the English colonies. They were also successful in other areas. The war that started in America spread to Europe and Asia. In every part of the world where fighting occurred, the British military faced defeat and dishonor.

But this inglorious scene was about to be succeeded by one of unrivalled brilliancy. From the point of extreme depression to which their affairs had sunk, the brightest era of British history was to commence. Far from being broken by misfortune, the spirit of the nation was high; and more of indignation than dismay was inspired by the ill success of their arms. The public voice had, at length, made its way to the throne, and had forced, on the unwilling monarch, a minister who has been justly deemed one of the greatest men of the age in which he lived.

But this shameful scene was about to be followed by one of unmatched brilliance. From the lowest point their situation had reached, the brightest era in British history was about to begin. Instead of being crushed by hardship, the nation's spirit was strong; the failure of their efforts sparked more anger than fear. The public's outcry had finally reached the throne and compelled the reluctant king to appoint a minister who is rightly considered one of the greatest figures of his time.

Mr. Pitt had been long distinguished in the House of Commons, for the boldness and the splendour of his eloquence. His parliamentary talents, and the independent grandeur of his character, had given him a great ascendency in that body, and had made him the idol of the nation. In 1756, he had been introduced into the cabinet, but could not long retain his place. The public affection followed him out of office; and, the national disasters continuing, it was found impracticable to conduct the complicated machine of government without his aid. In the summer of 1757, an administration was formed, which conciliated the great contending interests in parliament; and Mr. Pitt was placed at its head. The controlling superiority of his character gave him the same ascendency in the cabinet which he had obtained in the house of commons; and he seemed to dictate the measures of the nation. Only a short time was required to show that qualities, seldom united in the same person, were combined in him; and his talents for action seemed to eclipse even those he had displayed in debate. His plans partaking of the proud elevation of his own mind, and the exalted opinion he entertained of his countrymen, were always grand; and the means he employed for their execution, were always adequate to the object. Possessing the public confidence without limitation, he commanded all the resources of the nation, and drew liberally from the public purse; but the money was always faithfully and judiciously applied to the public service. Too great in his spirit, too lofty in his views, to become the instrument of faction; when placed at the head of the nation, he regarded only the interest of the nation; and, overlooking the country or the party, which had given birth to merit, he searched for merit only, and employed it wherever it was found. From the elevation of the house of Brunswick to the British throne, a great portion of the people, under the denomination of tories, had been degraded, persecuted, and oppressed. Superior to this narrow and short sighted policy, Mr. Pitt sought to level these enfeebling and irritating distinctions, and to engage every British subject in the cause of his country. Thus commanding both the strength and the wealth of the kingdom, with perhaps greater talents, he possessed certainly greater means, than any of his predecessors.[156]

Mr. Pitt had long stood out in the House of Commons for the boldness and brilliance of his speeches. His parliamentary skills and the independent strength of his character had given him significant influence in that body, making him a national favorite. In 1756, he was brought into the cabinet but couldn't hold his position for long. The public continued to support him even after he left office, and as national crises persisted, it became clear that it was impractical to run the complex government without his help. In the summer of 1757, a new administration was formed that reconciled the major conflicting interests in parliament, placing Mr. Pitt at its head. The commanding strength of his character gave him the same influence in the cabinet that he had in the House of Commons, allowing him to effectively set the nation's agenda. It quickly became clear that he possessed qualities rarely found in one person, and his ability for action seemed to surpass even his talents in debate. His plans, reflecting his lofty mindset and high regard for his fellow countrymen, were always ambitious, and the methods he used to carry them out were always suited to the goals. Enjoying the unwavering trust of the public, he commanded all of the nation’s resources and drew generously from the public funds; but the money was always put to faithful and wise use for the public good. Too great in spirit and too ambitious in his vision to become a tool of any political faction, when he led the nation, he focused solely on its interests; disregarding the country or party that had recognized his talent, he sought out merit and utilized it wherever it appeared. Since the rise of the house of Brunswick to the British throne, a significant portion of the population, labeled as tories, had been marginalized, persecuted, and oppressed. Rising above this narrow and shortsighted approach, Mr. Pitt aimed to eliminate these weakening and aggravating distinctions and to involve every British citizen in the national cause. In doing so, he commanded both the strength and the wealth of the kingdom, possessing perhaps greater talents and certainly greater resources than any of his predecessors.[156]

In no part of his majesty's dominions was the new administration more popular than in his American colonies. Deeply and peculiarly interested in the events of the war, they looked for a change of fortune from this change of men, and cheerfully made every exertion, of which they were capable, for the ensuing campaign. The circular letter of Mr. Pitt assured the several governors that, to repair the losses and disappointments of the last inactive campaign, the cabinet was determined to send a formidable force, to operate by sea and land, against the French in America; and he called upon them to raise as large bodies of men, within their respective governments, as the number of inhabitants might allow. Arms, ammunition, tents, provisions, and boats, would, he said, be furnished by the crown; and he required the colonies to clothe and pay their men; assuring them, at the same time, that it should be recommended to parliament to make them compensation.

In no part of the king's territories was the new administration more popular than in his American colonies. They were deeply and uniquely invested in the events of the war and hoped for a change in fortune with this change in leadership. They eagerly put in every effort they could muster for the upcoming campaign. Mr. Pitt's circular letter reassured the various governors that to make up for the losses and disappointments of the previous inactive campaign, the cabinet was determined to send a strong force to operate by sea and land against the French in America. He urged them to raise as many troops as their populations would allow. He stated that the crown would provide arms, ammunition, tents, supplies, and boats, but required the colonies to outfit and pay their soldiers while assuring them that it would be recommended to Parliament to offer them compensation.

Great preparations for the campaign.

The legislature of Massachusetts agreed to furnish seven thousand men; Connecticut five thousand; and New Hampshire three thousand. These troops, great as were their numbers, when compared with the population of the country, were in the field early in May; and the transports for carrying those of Massachusetts to Halifax, were ready to sail in fifteen days after they were engaged. Near one-third of the effective men of that province, are said to have been in military service; and the taxes were so heavy that, in the capital, they amounted to two-thirds of the income of real estate.[157]

The Massachusetts legislature agreed to provide seven thousand men; Connecticut five thousand; and New Hampshire three thousand. Even though these troop numbers were significant compared to the country’s population, they were deployed in early May; and the ships to transport the Massachusetts troops to Halifax were ready to sail within fifteen days of their enlistment. It’s reported that nearly one-third of the effective men in that province were in military service, and the taxes were so high that, in the capital, they amounted to two-thirds of the income from real estate.[157]

In the mother country too, the utmost activity was transfused into every department. Her fleets blocked up in the French ports the men and stores designed for Canada, and captured, on the seas, most of those which had been able to make their way into the ocean. Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst arrive.At the same time, a powerful armament, equipped with unusual expedition, sailed from her ports. Early in the spring, admiral Boscawen arrived at Halifax with a formidable fleet, and twelve thousand British troops, under the command of general Amherst.

In the mother country, there was a surge of activity in every area. Her fleets blocked French ports, preventing men and supplies meant for Canada from getting through, and they captured most of those that managed to reach the ocean. Admiral Boscawen and General Amherst have arrived. At the same time, a strong military force set sail from her ports with remarkable speed. Early in the spring, Admiral Boscawen arrived in Halifax with a powerful fleet and twelve thousand British troops led by General Amherst.

The earl of Loudoun had returned to England, and the command of the British and American forces in the colonies, had devolved on general Abercrombie. That officer found himself at the head of the most powerful army ever seen in the new world. His whole numbers, comprehending troops of every description, have been computed by Mr. Belsham at fifty thousand men, of whom twenty thousand were provincials.

The Earl of Loudoun had come back to England, and the command of the British and American forces in the colonies had passed to General Abercrombie. He found himself in charge of the largest army ever seen in the New World. According to Mr. Belsham, the total count, including all types of troops, was estimated at fifty thousand men, of which twenty thousand were locals.

The objects of the campaign were no longer defeated by delays. The preparations for action were made during the winter, and military operations commenced in the spring.

The goals of the campaign were no longer held back by delays. Preparations for action took place during the winter, and military operations started in the spring.

Plan of the campaign.

Three expeditions were proposed. The first was against Louisbourg; the second against Ticonderoga and Crown Point; and the third against fort Du Quêsne.[158]

Three expeditions were suggested. The first was aimed at Louisbourg; the second at Ticonderoga and Crown Point; and the third at Fort Duquesne.[158]

Expedition against Louisbourg.

The army destined against Louisbourg, consisting of fourteen thousand men, was commanded by major general Amherst; and the fleet, consisting of twenty ships of the line and eighteen frigates, by admiral Boscawen. On the 24th of May, the troops embarked at Halifax; and, on the 2d of June, arrived before Louisbourg.

The army set out to take on Louisbourg, made up of fourteen thousand men, was led by Major General Amherst, and the fleet, made up of twenty ships of the line and eighteen frigates, was under Admiral Boscawen. On May 24th, the troops boarded their ships in Halifax, and by June 2nd, they arrived in front of Louisbourg.

The use made by Great Britain of her naval superiority was felt in no part of the possessions of his Most Christian Majesty more sensibly than in Louisbourg. The garrison of that important place was composed of only two thousand five hundred regulars, aided by six hundred militia. The harbour was defended by five ships of the line; one ship of fifty guns; and five frigates, three of which were sunk across the mouth of the basin.

The impact of Great Britain's naval dominance was felt the strongest in Louisbourg, one of the possessions of his Most Christian Majesty. The garrison at this key location consisted of just two thousand five hundred regular soldiers, supported by six hundred militia. The harbor was protected by five ships of the line, one ship with fifty guns, and five frigates, three of which were sunk at the entrance of the basin.

Soon after investment of the place, one of the large ships was set on fire by a bomb from a battery on the light house point, and blown up. The flames were communicated to two others which shared the same fate. The English admiral then sent a detachment of six hundred seamen, in boats, into the harbour, under captains La Forcey and Balfour, to make an attempt on the two remaining ships of the line, which still kept possession of the basin. This service was executed with great gallantry. One, which was aground, was destroyed, and the other was towed off in triumph.

Soon after the area was taken over, one of the large ships was set on fire by a bomb from a battery at the lighthouse point and blown up. The flames spread to two other ships, which met the same fate. The English admiral then sent a group of six hundred sailors in boats into the harbor, led by Captains La Forcey and Balfour, to try to take the two remaining ships that still occupied the harbor. This mission was carried out with great bravery. One ship, which was stuck aground, was destroyed, and the other was triumphantly towed away.

The harbour being in possession of the English, and several practicable breaches made in the works, the place was no longer deemed defensible, and the governor was under the necessity of capitulating. The garrison became prisoners of war, and Louisbourg, with its artillery, provisions and military stores; and also Island Royal, St. Johns, and their dependencies, were surrendered to the English, who encountered no farther difficulty in taking possession of the whole island.[159]

The harbor was under English control, and several effective breaches had been made in the defenses, so the location was no longer considered defensible, and the governor had to surrender. The garrison became prisoners of war, and Louisbourg, along with its artillery, supplies, military equipment, and also Royal Island, St. Johns, and their territories, were handed over to the English, who faced no further challenges in taking over the entire island.[159]

This important acquisition was made with the loss of between five and six hundred men, killed and wounded. The joy it diffused throughout the colonies, long familiarised to disaster, was in proportion to their former disappointments.

This significant acquisition came at the cost of around five to six hundred men, dead or injured. The happiness it spread throughout the colonies, which had long been accustomed to defeat, was in line with their previous disappointments.

Against Ticonderoga.

The expedition against Ticonderoga and Crown Point was conducted by general Abercrombie in person. His army, consisting of near sixteen thousand effectives, of whom nine thousand were provincials, was attended by a formidable train of artillery, and possessed every requisite to ensure success.

The campaign against Ticonderoga and Crown Point was led personally by General Abercrombie. His army, made up of nearly sixteen thousand troops, with nine thousand being local militia, was supported by a powerful artillery unit and had everything needed to guarantee success.

On the 5th of July, he embarked on lake George, and reached the landing place early the next morning. A disembarkation being effected without opposition, the troops were immediately formed into four columns, the British in the centre, and the Provincials on the flanks; in which order they marched towards the advanced guard of the French, composed of one battalion posted in a log camp, which, on the approach of the English, made a precipitate retreat.

On July 5th, he set off for Lake George and arrived at the landing spot early the next morning. The troops disembarked without any resistance and were quickly organized into four columns, with the British in the center and the Provincials on the sides. They marched in this formation toward the French advanced guard, which was made up of one battalion stationed in a log camp. When the English approached, they retreated in a hurry.

Abercrombie continued his march towards Ticonderoga, with the intention of investing that place; but, the woods being thick, and the guides unskilful, his columns were thrown into confusion, and, in some measure, entangled with each other. In this situation lord Howe, at the head of the right centre column, fell in with a part of the advance guard of the French, which, in retreating from lake George, was likewise lost in the wood. He immediately attacked and dispersed them; killing several, and taking one hundred and forty-eight prisoners, among whom were five officers.

Abercrombie continued his march toward Ticonderoga, planning to invest in the area. However, the dense woods and unskilled guides caused his troops to become disorganized and somewhat entangled with each other. In this situation, Lord Howe, leading the right center column, encountered part of the French advance guard, which was lost in the woods while retreating from Lake George. He quickly attacked and scattered them, killing several and capturing one hundred and forty-eight prisoners, including five officers.

This small advantage was purchased at a dear rate. Though only two officers, on the side of the British, were killed, one of these was lord Howe himself, who fell on the first fire. This gallant young nobleman had endeared himself to the whole army. The British and provincials alike lamented his death; and the assembly of Massachusetts passed a vote for the erection of a superb cenotaph to his memory, in the collegiate church of Westminster, among the heroes and patriots of Great Britain.

This small advantage came at a high cost. Even though only two British officers were killed, one of them was Lord Howe himself, who fell in the first wave of fire. This brave young nobleman had won the affection of the entire army. Both the British and the colonists mourned his death; and the assembly of Massachusetts voted to build an impressive memorial to honor him in the collegiate church of Westminster, alongside the heroes and patriots of Great Britain.

Without farther opposition, the English army took possession of the post at the Saw Mills, within two miles of Ticonderoga. This fortress, which commands the communication between the two lakes, is encompassed on three sides by water, and secured in front by a morass. The ordinary garrison amounting to four thousand men, was stationed under the cannon of the place, and covered by a breast-work, the approach to which had been rendered extremely difficult by trees felled in front, with their branches outward, many of which were sharpened so as to answer the purpose of chevaux-de-frize. This body of troops was rendered still more formidable by its general than by its position. It was commanded by the marquis de Montcalm.

Without further opposition, the English army took control of the outpost at the Saw Mills, just two miles from Ticonderoga. This fortress, which oversees the route between the two lakes, is surrounded by water on three sides and protected in front by a swamp. The usual garrison of four thousand men was stationed under the fortress's guns and shielded by a breastwork, the approach to which was made extremely difficult by felled trees in front, with their branches pointing outward, many of which were sharpened to function as chevaux-de-frize. This group of troops was made even more intimidating by its general than by its position. It was led by the marquis de Montcalm.

Having learned from his prisoners the strength of the army under the walls of Ticonderoga, and that a reinforcement of three thousand men was daily expected, general Abercrombie thought it advisable to storm the place before this reinforcement should arrive. Being informed by an engineer directed to reconnoitre the works, that they were unfinished, and were practicable, he resolved, without waiting for his artillery, to storm the lines; and the dispositions for an assault were instantly made.

Having learned from his prisoners about the strength of the army at Ticonderoga and that an additional three thousand men were expected soon, General Abercrombie decided it would be wise to attack the fort before these reinforcements arrived. An engineer who was sent to survey the fortifications reported that they were incomplete and could be breached. Consequently, he made the decision to proceed with the assault without waiting for his artillery, and the preparations for the attack were quickly put in place.

The rangers, the light infantry, and the right wing of the provincials, were ordered to form a line out of cannon shot of the intrenchments, with their right extending to lake George, and their left to lake Champlain. The regulars who were to storm the works, were formed in the rear of this line. The piquets were to begin the attack, and to be sustained by the grenadiers; and the grenadiers by the battalions. The whole were ordered to march up briskly, to rush upon the enemy's fire, and to reserve their own until they had passed the breast-work.

The rangers, light infantry, and the right side of the provincial forces were instructed to form a line out of cannon range from the fortifications, with their right stretching to Lake George and their left to Lake Champlain. The regular troops designated to storm the fortifications were positioned behind this line. The pickets were to initiate the attack, supported by the grenadiers, and the grenadiers would be backed by the battalions. Everyone was ordered to advance quickly, charging at the enemy's fire, and to hold their own fire until they had crossed the barricade.

The troops marched to the assault with great intrepidity; but their utmost efforts could make no impression on the works. The impediments in front of the intrenchments retarded their advance, and exposed them, while entangled among the boughs of the trees, to a very galling fire. The breast-work itself was eight or nine feet high, and much stronger than had been represented; so that the assailants, who do not appear to have been furnished with ladders, were unable to pass it. After a contest of near four hours, and several repeated attacks, general Abercrombie ordered a retreat.

The troops charged into the attack with great bravery, but their best efforts couldn’t make a dent in the defenses. The obstacles in front of the fortifications slowed their progress and left them vulnerable to a brutal gunfire while they got tangled in the tree branches. The breastwork was eight or nine feet tall and much sturdier than expected, so the attackers, who seemingly didn’t have any ladders, couldn’t get over it. After nearly four hours of fighting and several repeated attempts, General Abercrombie called for a retreat.

General Abercrombie repulsed under the walls of Ticonderoga.

The army retired to the camp from which it had marched in the morning; and, the next day, resumed its former position on the south side of lake George.[160]

The army returned to the camp where it had left in the morning; and the next day, it took up its previous position on the south side of Lake George.[160]

In this rash attempt, the killed and wounded of the English amounted to near two thousand men, of whom not quite four hundred were provincials. The French were covered during the whole action, and their loss was inconsiderable.[161]

In this reckless move, the English casualties totaled nearly two thousand men, with just under four hundred being locals. The French were protected throughout the entire encounter, and their losses were minimal.[161]

Entirely disconcerted by this unexpected and bloody repulse, General Abercrombie relinquished his designs against Ticonderoga and Crown Point. Searching however for the means of repairing the misfortune, if not the disgrace, sustained by his arms, he readily acceded to a proposition made by colonel Bradstreet, for an expedition against fort Frontignac. This fortress stands on the north side of Ontario, at the point where the St. Lawrence issues from that lake; and though a post of real importance, had been left, in a great degree, undefended.

Entirely thrown off by this unexpected and bloody setback, General Abercrombie gave up his plans against Ticonderoga and Crown Point. However, looking for a way to correct the misfortune, if not the embarrassment, faced by his forces, he quickly agreed to a suggestion made by Colonel Bradstreet for an expedition against Fort Frontenac. This fortress is located on the north side of Lake Ontario, at the point where the St. Lawrence River flows out of the lake; and although it was an important post, it had been largely left undefended.

The detachment designed for this service was commanded by colonel Bradstreet. It consisted of three thousand men, of whom two hundred were British, and was furnished with eight pieces of cannon, and three mortars.

The unit set up for this service was led by Colonel Bradstreet. It had three thousand soldiers, including two hundred British, and was equipped with eight cannons and three mortars.

Fort Frontignac taken.

Colonel Bradstreet embarked on the Ontario at Oswego, and on the 25th of August, landed within one mile of the fort. In two days, his batteries were opened at so short a distance that almost every shell took effect; and the governor, finding the place absolutely untenable, surrendered at discretion. The Indians having deserted, the prisoners amounted only to one hundred and ten men. A great quantity of military stores, together with nine armed vessels, mounting from eight to eighteen guns, also fell into the hands of the English.[162]

Colonel Bradstreet set sail on the Ontario from Oswego and landed within a mile of the fort on August 25th. Within two days, his artillery was so close that nearly every shell hit its target; realizing the fort was completely indefensible, the governor surrendered unconditionally. With the Indians having deserted, only one hundred and ten men were taken prisoner. A large amount of military supplies, along with nine armed vessels ranging from eight to eighteen guns, also came into the possession of the English.[162]

After destroying the fort and vessels, and such stores as could not be brought off, colonel Bradstreet returned to the army which undertook nothing farther during the campaign.

After destroying the fort and the ships, along with any supplies that couldn't be taken, Colonel Bradstreet returned to the army, which did not engage in any further activities for the rest of the campaign.

Expedition against Fort Du Quêsne.

The demolition of fort Frontignac and of the stores which had been collected there, contributed materially, to the success of the expedition against fort Du Quêsne. The conduct of this enterprise had been entrusted to general Forbes, who marched from Philadelphia, about the beginning of July, at the head of the main body of the army, destined for this service, in order to join colonel Bouquet at Raystown. So much time was employed in preparing to move from this place, that the Virginia regulars, commanded by colonel Washington, were not ordered to join the British troops until the month of September. It had been determined not to use the road made by Braddock, but to cut a new one from Raystown to fort du Quêsne. About the time this resolution was formed, and before the army was put in motion, major Grant was detached from the advanced post at Loyal Hannan with eight hundred men, to reconnoitre the fort and the adjacent country. This gentleman invited an attack from the garrison, the result of which was that upwards of three hundred of the detachment were killed and wounded, and major Grant himself was made a prisoner.[163]

The demolition of Fort Frontignac and the supplies stored there significantly contributed to the success of the mission against Fort Duquesne. General Forbes was in charge of this operation and set out from Philadelphia at the beginning of July, leading the main body of the army to join Colonel Bouquet at Raystown. So much time was spent preparing to leave this location that the Virginia regulars, commanded by Colonel Washington, weren’t ordered to join the British troops until September. It was decided to create a new road from Raystown to Fort Duquesne instead of using the route made by Braddock. Around the time this decision was made, and before the army set out, Major Grant was sent from the advanced post at Loyalhanna with eight hundred men to scout the fort and the surrounding area. He provoked an attack from the garrison, resulting in over three hundred men from his detachment being killed or wounded, and Major Grant himself was captured.[163]

Fort Du Quêsne evacuated.

Early in October general Forbes moved from Raystown; but the obstructions to his march were so great that he did not reach fort Du Quêsne until late in November. The garrison, being deserted by the Indians, and too weak to maintain the place against the formidable army which was approaching, abandoned the fort the evening before the arrival of the British, and escaped down the Ohio in boats. The English placed a garrison in it, and changed its name to Pittsburg, in compliment to their popular minister. The acquisition of this post was of great importance to Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. Its possession had given the French an absolute control over the Indians of the Ohio, who were accustomed to assemble at that place, for the purpose of making their destructive incursions into those colonies. Their route was marked by fire and the scalping knife; and neither age nor sex could afford exemption from their ferocity. The expulsion of the French gave the English entire possession of the country, and produced a complete revolution in the disposition of the Indians inhabiting it. Finding the current of success to be running against their ancient friends, they were willing to reconcile themselves to the most powerful; and all the Indians between the lakes and the Ohio concluded a peace with the English.

Early in October, General Forbes left Raystown, but the obstacles to his march were so significant that he didn’t reach Fort Du Quesne until late November. The garrison had been abandoned by the Indians and was too weak to defend the fort against the approaching strong British army, so they left the fort the evening before the British arrived and escaped down the Ohio River in boats. The British stationed a garrison there and renamed it Pittsburgh in honor of their popular minister. Gaining control of this post was very important for Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia. Its control had given the French complete authority over the Indians in the Ohio region, who would gather there to launch their destructive raids into those colonies. Their path was marked by fire and scalping, and no one, regardless of age or gender, was spared from their brutality. The removal of the French allowed the British full control of the territory and completely changed the relationship with the local Indians. Seeing that their traditional allies were losing power, many tribes were eager to align with the strongest force, leading all the Indians between the Great Lakes and the Ohio River to make peace with the British.

Although the events of 1758 did not equal the expectations which had been formed from the force brought into the field, the advantages were decisive. The whole country constituting the original cause of the war, had changed masters, and was in possession of the English. The acquisition of the island of Cape Breton opened the way to Quebec; and their success in the west enabled them to direct all their force against Canada. The colonists, encouraged by this revolution in their affairs, and emboldened, by the conquests already made, to hope for others still more extensive, prepared vigorously on the application of Mr. Pitt, for the farther prosecution of the war.

Although the events of 1758 didn't live up to the expectations set by the forces brought into the field, the advantages were significant. The entire region that had originally caused the war had changed hands and was now under English control. Capturing the island of Cape Breton opened the route to Quebec, and their successes in the west allowed them to focus all their efforts on Canada. The colonists, motivated by this change in their fortunes and encouraged by the conquests they had already achieved, eagerly prepared, at Mr. Pitt's urging, to continue the fight in the war.

General Amherst succeeds General Abercrombie.

Late in the year 1758, general Abercrombie was succeeded in the command of the army by major general Amherst, who formed the bold plan of conquering Canada in the course of the ensuing campaign.

Late in 1758, General Abercrombie was replaced in command of the army by Major General Amherst, who created an ambitious plan to conquer Canada during the upcoming campaign.

1759

The decided superiority of Great Britain at sea, and the great exertions of France in other quarters of the world, still prevented the arrival of such reinforcements as were necessary for the preservation of his most christian majesty's possessions in North America. Plan of the campaign.To take advantage of this weakness, the English proposed to enter Canada by three different routes, with three powerful armies; and to attack all the strongholds by which that country was defended.

The clear superiority of Great Britain at sea, along with France's major efforts in other parts of the world, still delayed the arrival of the reinforcements needed to protect the possessions of his most Christian Majesty in North America. Campaign plan. To exploit this weakness, the English planned to invade Canada through three different routes with three strong armies and to assault all the fortifications defending that country.

It was determined that one division of the army, to be commanded by brigadier general Wolfe, a young officer who had signalised himself in the siege of Louisbourg, should ascend the St. Lawrence, and lay siege to Quebec. A strong fleet was to escort the troops destined for this enterprise, and to co-operate with them.

It was decided that one division of the army, led by Brigadier General Wolfe, a young officer who had distinguished himself during the siege of Louisbourg, would move up the St. Lawrence River and lay siege to Quebec. A strong fleet would escort the troops assigned to this mission and support them.

Major general Amherst was to lead the central and main army against Ticonderoga and Crown Point. After making himself master of these places, he was to proceed over lake Champlain, and by the way of Richelieu, to the St. Lawrence, and down that river, so as to effect a junction with general Wolfe before the walls of Quebec. From their combined force, the conquest of the capital of Canada was expected.

Major General Amherst was set to lead the main army against Ticonderoga and Crown Point. Once he took control of these locations, he was to cross Lake Champlain and follow the Richelieu River to reach the St. Lawrence, then move down that river to join forces with General Wolfe outside Quebec. Together, they expected to conquer the capital of Canada.

The third army was to be commanded by general Prideaux. Its first destination was against Niagara. After the reduction of this place, Prideaux was to embark on lake Ontario, and proceed down the St. Lawrence against Montreal. Should Montreal fall into his hands before the surrender of Quebec, he was to join the grand army at that place.[164]

The third army was to be led by General Prideaux. Its first target was Niagara. After capturing this location, Prideaux was to board a ship on Lake Ontario and head down the St. Lawrence River towards Montreal. If he took Montreal before Quebec surrendered, he was to join the main army there.[164]

It could not be expected that a plan so extensive and so complex, should succeed in all its parts; and it was greatly to be apprehended, that the failure of one part might defeat the whole. But it suited the daring spirit which eminently distinguished the officers then commanding the British forces, and was entered upon with zeal and activity.

It was unrealistic to expect that such a large and complicated plan would succeed in every aspect; there was a real concern that the failure of one part could undermine the entire thing. However, it matched the bold spirit that clearly characterized the officers leading the British forces at that time, and they approached it with enthusiasm and energy.

As the other two expeditions, especially that against Quebec, were supposed to depend greatly on the celerity with which the movements of the main army should be made, general Amherst began his preparations in the commencement of winter, for the enterprise he was to undertake. Early in the spring, he transferred his head quarters from New York to Albany, where his troops were assembled by the last of May. Notwithstanding his continued exertions, the summer was far advanced before he could cross lake George; Ticonderoga abandoned.nor did he reach Ticonderoga until the 22d of July. The lines drawn around that place were immediately abandoned, and the English took possession of them.

As with the other two expeditions, especially the one against Quebec, which were believed to rely heavily on how quickly the main army moved, General Amherst started his preparations at the beginning of winter for the operation he was set to carry out. Early in the spring, he moved his headquarters from New York to Albany, where his troops gathered by the end of May. Despite his ongoing efforts, summer was well underway before he managed to cross Lake George; Ticonderoga deserted. He didn't reach Ticonderoga until July 22nd. The defenses around that location were quickly abandoned, and the English took control of them.

The French troops in this quarter being unequal to the defence of the posts they held, their object seems to have been to embarrass and delay the invading army; but not to hazard any considerable diminution of strength, by persevering in the defence of places until the retreat of the garrison should become impracticable. The hope was entertained, that by retreating from post to post, and making a show of intending to defend each, the advance of the English might be retarded, until the season for action on the lakes should pass away; while the French would be gradually strengthened by concentration, and thus enabled to maintain some point, which would arrest the progress of Amherst down the St. Lawrence.

The French troops in this area were unable to defend the positions they held, so their goal seemed to be to slow down and frustrate the advancing army. However, they didn't want to risk a significant loss of strength by holding onto locations until it was impossible for their forces to retreat. They hoped that by falling back from one position to another and making it seem like they planned to defend each one, they could delay the English advance until the opportunity for action on the lakes had passed. Meanwhile, the French would gradually strengthen their forces through concentration, allowing them to hold a key position that could stop Amherst's advance down the St. Lawrence.

In pursuance of this plan, as soon as the English had completed their arrangements for taking possession of lake Champlain, the garrison of Ticonderoga retreated to Crown Point.

In following this plan, once the English finished their preparations to take control of Lake Champlain, the garrison at Ticonderoga pulled back to Crown Point.

and Crown Point.

Early in the month of August, Amherst advanced to Crown Point, which was abandoned on his approach; and the garrison retired to isle Aux Noix, at the northern extremity of lake Champlain. The French had collected between three and four thousand men at this place, in an entrenched camp, defended by artillery, and protected by several armed vessels on the lake. After making great exertions to obtain a naval superiority, General Amherst embarked his army on lake Champlain; but, a succession of storms compelling him to abandon the farther prosecution of the enterprise, he returned to Crown Point, where the troops were put into winter quarters.[165]

Early in August, Amherst moved to Crown Point, which was deserted as he approached, and the garrison retreated to Isle Aux Noix, at the northern end of Lake Champlain. The French had gathered about three to four thousand men in a fortified camp there, defended by artillery and protected by several armed ships on the lake. After making significant efforts to gain naval superiority, General Amherst loaded his army onto Lake Champlain; however, a series of storms forced him to abandon further plans and return to Crown Point, where the troops were settled for the winter.[165]

In the beginning of July, general Prideaux, embarked on lake Ontario with the army destined against Niagara. Immediately after his departure from Oswego, that place, which was defended by twelve hundred men under the command of colonel Haldiman, was vigorously attacked by a body of French and Indians, who were repulsed with some loss.

In early July, General Prideaux set out on Lake Ontario with the army headed for Niagara. Right after he left Oswego, the location, which was defended by 1,200 men under Colonel Haldiman, was aggressively attacked by a group of French and Indians, who were pushed back with some losses.

In the mean time, Prideaux proceeded towards Niagara, and landed without opposition, about three miles from the fort. The place was invested in form, and the siege was carried on by regular approaches. In its progress, General Prideaux was killed by the bursting of a cohorn, and the command devolved on general Johnson. Great efforts were made to relieve this important place. A considerable body of troops drawn from the neighbouring garrisons, aided by some Indian auxiliaries, advanced on the English army, with the determination to risk a battle, in order to raise the siege. Early in the morning of the 24th, the approach of this party was announced, and a strong detachment marched out to meet it. The action, which immediately commenced, was not of long duration. The French were forsaken by their savage allies, and victory soon declared in favour of the English.

In the meantime, Prideaux moved toward Niagara and landed without any resistance, about three miles from the fort. The area was formally surrounded, and the siege was conducted through structured approaches. As the siege progressed, General Prideaux was killed when a cohorn exploded, and command switched to General Johnson. Significant efforts were made to save this crucial location. A large group of troops gathered from nearby garrisons, supported by some Native American allies, advanced against the English army, determined to take the risk of a battle to lift the siege. Early in the morning on the 24th, news of this group's approach was reported, and a strong detachment was sent out to confront them. The battle that followed was brief. The French were abandoned by their Native allies, and victory quickly favored the English.

Niagara capitulates.

This battle decided the fate of Niagara. The works of the besiegers had been pushed within one hundred yards of the walls, and a farther attempt to defend the place being hopeless, a capitulation was signed, by which the garrison, amounting to rather more than six hundred men, became prisoners of war.

This battle determined the fate of Niagara. The attackers had advanced to within one hundred yards of the walls, and a further attempt to defend the site seemed hopeless, so a surrender was signed, which meant the garrison, consisting of just over six hundred men, were taken as prisoners of war.

Although important advantages were gained by the British arms in Upper Canada, yet, as neither division of the army, in that quarter, succeeded so completely as to co-operate with general Wolfe, serious fears were entertained for the fate of that officer. The enterprise conducted by him being of the greatest hazard and of the deepest interest, its success was to decide, whether the whole campaign would terminate in a manner favourable to the future conquest of Canada.

Although the British forces made significant gains in Upper Canada, neither division of the army in that area managed to fully cooperate with General Wolfe, leading to serious concerns about his safety. The operation he was leading was extremely risky and crucial, and its success would determine whether the entire campaign would end in a way that favored the future conquest of Canada.

Expedition against Quebec.

As soon as the waters were sufficiently freed from ice to be navigable, Wolfe embarked eight thousand men with a formidable train of artillery, at Louisbourg, under convoy of admirals Saunders and Holmes. Late in June, he anchored about half way up the island of Orleans, on which he landed, without opposition.

As soon as the ice melted enough for the waters to be navigable, Wolfe set sail with eight thousand men and a significant amount of artillery from Louisbourg, escorted by admirals Saunders and Holmes. By late June, he anchored about halfway up the island of Orleans, where he landed without facing any resistance.

From this position, he could take a near and accurate view of the obstacles to be surmounted, before he could hope for success in his enterprise. These were so great, that even his bold and sanguine temper perceived more to fear than to hope; and, in a celebrated letter written to Mr. Pitt, and afterwards published, he declared that he could not flatter himself with being able to reduce the place.[166]

From this position, he could get a close and clear view of the obstacles he needed to overcome before he could hope for success in his endeavor. These challenges were so significant that even his brave and optimistic nature could see more reasons to be afraid than to be hopeful; and in a famous letter written to Mr. Pitt, which was later published, he stated that he couldn't delude himself into thinking he could take the place.[166]

Quebec stands on the north side of the St. Lawrence, and on the west of the St. Charles, which rivers unite immediately below the town. It consists of an upper and a lower town; the latter is built upon the strand, which stretches along the base of the lofty rock, on which the former is situated. This rock continues, with a bold and steep front, far to the westward, parallel to, and near the river St. Lawrence. On this side, therefore, the city might well be deemed inaccessible. On the other, it was protected by the river St. Charles, in which were several armed vessels, and floating batteries, deriving additional security from a strong boom drawn across its mouth. The channel of this river is rough and broken, and its borders intersected with ravines. On its left, or eastern bank, was encamped a French army, strongly entrenched, and amounting, according to the English accounts, to ten thousand men.[167] The encampment extended from St. Charles, eastward, to the Montmorency, and its rear was covered by an almost impenetrable wood. To render this army still more formidable, it was commanded by a general, who had given signal proofs of active courage, and consummate prudence. The marquis de Montcalm, who, when strong enough to act offensively, had so rapidly carried Oswego, and fort William Henry, and who, when reduced to the defensive, had driven Abercrombie with such slaughter from the walls of Ticonderoga, was now at the head of the army which covered Quebec, and was an antagonist, in all respects, worthy of Wolfe.

Quebec is located on the north side of the St. Lawrence River and to the west of the St. Charles River, where the two rivers meet just below the city. It has an upper and a lower town; the lower town is built along the shore at the base of the high rock where the upper town sits. This rock extends boldly and steeply far to the west, running parallel to and close to the St. Lawrence River, making that side of the city seem almost impossible to access. On the other side, it is protected by the St. Charles River, which had several armed boats and floating batteries, further secured by a strong boom across its mouth. The river’s channel is rough and uneven, with ravines along its banks. On the eastern bank, a French army was camped, heavily fortified, and according to English reports, numbered around ten thousand men. The camp stretched from St. Charles eastward to the Montmorency and was shielded by a nearly impenetrable forest. Adding to the army's strength, it was led by a general known for his exceptional bravery and strategic skill. The Marquis de Montcalm, who had swiftly captured Oswego and Fort William Henry when able to take the offensive, and who had driven Abercrombie back with heavy losses from Ticonderoga when forced to defend, was now leading the army that surrounded Quebec, making him a formidable opponent for Wolfe.

The British general perceived these difficulties in their full extent, but, his ardent mind glowing with military enthusiasm, sought only how to subdue them.

The British general recognized these challenges completely, but his passionate mind, filled with military enthusiasm, focused solely on how to overcome them.

He took possession of Point Levi, on the southern side of the St. Lawrence, where he erected several heavy batteries, which opened on the town, but were at too great a distance to make any considerable impression on the works. Nor could his ships be employed in this service. The elevation of the principal fortifications placed them beyond the reach of the guns of the fleet; and the river was so commanded by the batteries on shore, as to render a station near the town ineligible.

He took control of Point Levi, on the south side of the St. Lawrence, where he built several heavy batteries that targeted the town, but they were too far away to have much effect on the defenses. Nor could his ships be used for this purpose. The height of the main fortifications put them out of range of the fleet's guns, and the batteries on shore had such a commanding view of the river that setting up a position near the town was not a good option.

The English general, sensible of the impracticability of reducing Quebec, unless he should be enabled to erect his batteries on the north side of the St. Lawrence, determined to use his utmost endeavours to bring Montcalm to an engagement. After several unavailing attempts to draw that able officer from his advantageous position, Wolfe resolved to pass the Montmorency, and to attack him in his entrenchments.

The English general, realizing that it was impossible to take Quebec unless he could set up his artillery on the north side of the St. Lawrence, decided to do everything he could to force Montcalm into a fight. After several unsuccessful attempts to lure that skilled officer from his strong position, Wolfe decided to cross the Montmorency and attack him in his defenses.

In consequence of this resolution, thirteen companies of British grenadiers, and part of the second battalion of royal Americans, were landed near the mouth of the Montmorency, under cover of the cannon of the ships; while two divisions, under generals Townshend and Murray, prepared to cross that river higher up. The original plan was to make the first attack on a detached redoubt close to the water's edge, apparently unprotected by the fire from the entrenchments, in the hope that Montcalm might be induced to support this work, and thereby enable Wolfe to bring on a general engagement.[168]

As a result of this decision, thirteen companies of British grenadiers and part of the second battalion of royal Americans were landed near the mouth of the Montmorency, shielded by the cannon fire from the ships. Meanwhile, two divisions, led by generals Townshend and Murray, got ready to cross the river further upstream. The initial plan was to launch the first attack on a separate redoubt near the water's edge, which seemed unprotected by the fire from the entrenchments, hoping that Montcalm would be prompted to support this position and thus allow Wolfe to initiate a full-scale battle.[168]

On the approach of the British troops, this redoubt was evacuated. Observing some confusion in the French camp, Wolfe determined to avail himself of the supposed impression of the moment, and to storm the lines. With this view, he directed the grenadiers and royal Americans to form on the beach, where they were to wait until the whole army could be arranged to sustain them. Orders were at the same time dispatched to Townshend and Murray to be in readiness for fording the river.

On the arrival of the British troops, this fort was abandoned. Noticing some chaos in the French camp, Wolfe decided to take advantage of the situation and attack the lines. To do this, he ordered the grenadiers and royal Americans to assemble on the beach, where they would wait until the entire army could be organized to support them. At the same time, orders were sent to Townshend and Murray to be ready to cross the river.

The grenadiers and royal Americans, disregarding their orders, rushed forward, with impetuous valour on the entrenchments of the enemy. They were received with so steady and well supported a fire, that they were thrown into confusion, and compelled to retreat. The English army repulsed.The general advancing in person with the remaining brigades, the fugitives formed again in the rear of the army; but the plan of the attack was effectually disconcerted, and the English commander gave orders for re-passing the river, and returning to the island of Orleans.

The grenadiers and royal Americans, ignoring their orders, charged ahead with reckless bravery at the enemy's fortifications. They encountered such a steady and well-supported fire that they fell into disarray and had to retreat. The British army pushed back. The general, moving forward with the remaining brigades, saw the fleeing troops regrouping behind the army; however, the attack plan was thoroughly disrupted, and the English commander ordered a crossing back over the river to return to the island of Orleans.

Convinced by this disaster of the impracticability of approaching Quebec on the side of the Montmorency, Wolfe again turned his whole attention to the St. Lawrence. To destroy some ships of war lying in the river, and at the same time to distract the attention of Montcalm by descents at different places, twelve hundred men were embarked in transports under the command of general Murray, who made two vigorous, but unsuccessful attempts, to land on the northern shore. In the third he was more fortunate. In a sudden descent on Chambaud, he burnt a valuable magazine filled with military stores, but was still unable to accomplish the main object of the expedition. The ships were secured in such a manner as not to be approached by the fleet or army. Murray was recalled; and on his return brought with him the intelligence that Niagara was taken, that Ticonderoga and Crown Point had been abandoned, and that general Amherst was making preparations to attack the isle Aux Noix.[169]

Convinced by this disaster that attacking Quebec from the Montmorency side was unfeasible, Wolfe focused all his efforts on the St. Lawrence. To destroy some warships in the river and distract Montcalm with landings at various points, twelve hundred men were loaded onto transports under General Murray's command. He made two strong but unsuccessful attempts to land on the northern shore. In the third attempt, he had better luck. In a sudden raid on Chambaud, he burned a valuable storehouse full of military supplies but still couldn't achieve the main goal of the mission. The ships were protected in such a way that they couldn't be reached by the fleet or army. Murray was recalled, and upon his return, he confirmed that Niagara had fallen, that Ticonderoga and Crown Point had been abandoned, and that General Amherst was preparing to attack Isle Aux Noix.[169]

This intelligence, though joyfully received, promised no immediate assistance; and the season for action was rapidly wasting away.[170] Nor was it easy for Wolfe to avoid contrasting the success of the British arms under other auspices, with the ill fortune attending his own.

This news, while welcomed, didn't offer any immediate help; and the time for taking action was quickly running out.[170] It wasn't easy for Wolfe to overlook the successes of the British forces under different leadership, especially when compared to his own struggles.

A council of war having determined that all their future efforts should be directed towards effecting a landing above the town, the troops were withdrawn from the island of Orleans, and embarked on board the fleet. Some of them were landed at Point Levi, and the residue carried higher up the river.[171]

A war council decided that all their future efforts should focus on landing above the town, so the troops were pulled back from the island of Orleans and boarded the fleet. Some were landed at Point Levi, and the rest were taken further up the river.[171]

Montcalm could not view this movement without alarm. That part of Quebec, which faces the country, had not been well fortified; and he was apprehensive that a landing might be effected high up the river, and the town approached on its weak side. At the same time, he could not safely relinquish his position, because the facility of transportation which the command of the water gave the English, would enable them to seize the ground he then occupied, should his army be moved above the town.

Montcalm couldn't watch this movement without feeling anxious. That part of Quebec, facing the countryside, wasn't well fortified, and he worried that the enemy could land further up the river and attack the town from its vulnerable side. At the same time, he couldn't safely abandon his position, because the ease of transportation that controlling the water provided the English would allow them to take over the ground he was currently occupying if he moved his army above the town.

Thus embarrassed, he detached Monsieur de Bougainville with fifteen hundred men, to watch the motions of the English, and to prevent their landing.

Thus embarrassed, he assigned Monsieur de Bougainville fifteen hundred men to watch the movements of the English and to prevent their landing.

In this state of things Wolfe formed the bold and hazardous plan of landing in the night, a small distance above the city, on the northern bank of the river; and, by scaling a precipice, accessible only by a narrow path, and therefore but weakly guarded, to gain the heights in the rear of the town.

In this situation, Wolfe came up with the daring and risky idea of landing at night, just a little upstream from the city, on the northern bank of the river. By climbing a steep cliff, which could only be reached by a narrow path and was thus poorly defended, he aimed to take control of the high ground behind the town.

This resolution being taken, the admiral moved up the river, several leagues above the place where the landing was to be attempted, and made demonstrations of an intention to disembark a body of troops at different places. During the night, a strong detachment, in flat bottomed boats, fell silently down with the tide to the place fixed on for the descent. This was made an hour before day-break, about a mile above cape Diamond, Wolfe being the first man who leaped on shore. The Highlanders and light infantry, who composed the van, under the particular command of colonel Howe, had been directed to secure a four gun battery defending an entrenched path by which the heights were to be ascended, and to cover the landing of the remaining troops. The violence of the current forced them rather below the point of disembarkation; a circumstance which increased their difficulties. However, scrambling up the precipice, they gained the heights, and quickly dispersed the guard. The whole army followed up this narrow pass; and, having encountered only a scattering fire from some Canadians and Indians, gained the summit by the break of day, when the several corps were formed under their respective leaders.[172]

Once this decision was made, the admiral moved up the river, several leagues above the spot where the landing was planned, and pretended to disembark troops at different locations. During the night, a strong group in flat-bottomed boats quietly floated down with the tide to the designated landing site. This happened an hour before dawn, about a mile above Cape Diamond, with Wolfe being the first to leap ashore. The Highlanders and light infantry, leading the way under Colonel Howe's command, were instructed to secure a four-gun battery that protected a path leading up the heights and to cover the landing of the rest of the troops. The strength of the current pushed them slightly below the intended landing point, making things more challenging. However, they managed to scramble up the cliff, reached the heights, and quickly drove off the guards. The entire army followed this narrow route and, facing only scattered fire from some Canadians and Indians, reached the summit by daybreak, where the various units assembled under their respective leaders.[172]

The intelligence that the English had gained the heights of Abraham was soon conveyed to Montcalm, who comprehended at once the full force of the advantage obtained by his adversary, and prepared for the engagement which could no longer be avoided. Leaving his camp at Montmorency, he crossed the St. Charles, for the purpose of attacking the English army.[173]

The information that the English had taken the heights of Abraham quickly reached Montcalm, who immediately understood the significance of the advantage held by his opponent and got ready for the inevitable battle. Leaving his camp at Montmorency, he crossed the St. Charles to launch an attack on the English army.[173]

This movement was made in the view of Wolfe, who immediately formed his order of battle. His right wing was commanded by general Monckton, and his left by general Murray. The right flank was covered by the Louisbourg grenadiers, and the rear and left by the light infantry of Howe. The reserve consisted of Webb's regiment, drawn up in eight subdivisions, with large intervals between them.

This maneuver was visible to Wolfe, who quickly organized his troops. General Monckton led the right flank, while General Murray commanded the left. The right side was protected by the Louisbourg grenadiers, and the light infantry under Howe covered the rear and left. The reserve was made up of Webb's regiment, arranged in eight groups with significant gaps between them.

Montcalm had formed his two wings of European and colonial troops in nearly equal numbers. A column of Europeans composed his centre; and two small field pieces were brought up to play on the English line. In this order he marched to the attack, advancing in his front about fifteen hundred militia and Indians, who kept up an irregular and galling fire under cover of the bushes.

Montcalm had arranged his two wings of European and colonial troops in nearly equal numbers. A column of Europeans made up his center, and two small cannon were brought up to target the English line. In this formation, he moved forward to attack, with about fifteen hundred militia and Native Americans in front, who maintained an inconsistent but annoying fire from behind the bushes.

The movements of the French indicating an intention to flank his left, general Wolfe ordered the battalion of Amherst, and the two battalions of royal Americans, to that part of his line; where they were formed en potence under general Townshend, presenting a double front. Disregarding the fire of the militia and Indians, he ordered his troops to reserve themselves for the column advancing in the rear of these irregulars.

The French were moving to try and attack his left side, so General Wolfe directed the Amherst battalion and the two battalions of Royal Americans to that section of his line. They were organized en potence under General Townshend, creating a double front. Ignoring the gunfire from the militia and Indians, he instructed his troops to hold their positions for the column advancing behind these irregular forces.

Battle on the plains of Abraham.

Montcalm had taken post on the left of the French army, and Wolfe on the right of the British; so that the two generals met each other, at the head of their respective troops; and there the battle was most severe. The French advanced briskly to the charge, and commenced the action with great animation. The English reserved their fire until the enemy were within forty yards of them, when they gave it with immense effect. The action was kept up for some time with great spirit. Death of Wolfe,Wolfe, advancing at the head of his grenadiers with charged bayonets, received a mortal wound and soon afterwards expired. Undismayed by the loss of their general, the English continued their exertions under Monckton, on whom the command devolved. He also received a ball through his body, and general Townshend took command of the British army. and of Montcalm.About the same time Montcalm received a mortal wound, and general Senezergus, the second in command, also fell. The left wing and centre of the French began to give way; and, being pressed close by the British, were driven from the field.

Montcalm was positioned on the left side of the French army, while Wolfe was on the right side of the British. The two generals faced each other at the front lines with their troops, and that's where the fighting was the fiercest. The French charged forward eagerly and started the battle with a lot of energy. The English held their fire until the enemy was within forty yards, then they fired back with tremendous effectiveness. The clash continued for a while with great intensity. Death of Wolfe,Wolfe, leading his grenadiers with their bayonets ready, took a fatal wound and died shortly after. Undeterred by the loss of their general, the English pressed on under Monckton, who took over command. He was also shot through the body, and then general Townshend took charge of the British army. and of Montcalm.Around the same time, Montcalm was mortally wounded, and general Senezergus, who was second in command, also fell. The left wing and center of the French started to crumble, and as they were closely pressed by the British, they were pushed off the battlefield.

On the left and rear of the English, the action was less severe. The light infantry had been placed in houses; and colonel Howe, the better to support them, had taken post still farther to the left, behind a copse. As the right of the French attacked the English left, he sallied from this position, upon their flanks, and threw them into disorder. In this critical moment, Townshend advanced several platoons against their front, and completely frustrated the attempt to turn the left flank.

On the left and back of the English, the fighting was not as intense. The light infantry had taken up positions in the houses, and Colonel Howe, to better support them, had moved even further left, behind a thicket. As the right side of the French launched an attack on the English left, he charged out from this position, hitting them on their flanks and causing confusion. At this crucial moment, Townshend pushed several platoons forward against their front, completely thwarting the effort to outflank the left side.

Victory of the English.

In this state of the action, Townshend was informed that the command had devolved on him. Proceeding instantly to the centre, he found that part of the army thrown into some disorder by the ardour of pursuit; and his immediate efforts were employed in restoring the line. Scarcely was this effected, when Monsieur de Bougainville, who had been detached as high as cape Rouge to prevent a landing above, and who, on hearing that the English had gained the plains of Abraham, hastened to the assistance of Montcalm, appeared in the rear at the head of fifteen hundred men. Fortunately for the English, the right wing of the French, as well as their left and centre, had been entirely broken, and driven off the field. Two battalions and two pieces of artillery being advanced towards Bougainville, he retired; and Townshend did not think it advisable to risk the important advantages already gained, by pursuing this fresh body of troops through a difficult country.[174]

In this moment of action, Townshend learned that the command had fallen to him. He quickly moved to the center and found part of the army in disarray due to the intensity of the chase; he immediately focused on reestablishing the formation. Just as this was accomplished, Monsieur de Bougainville, who had been sent as far as Cape Rouge to prevent a landing upstream, rushed to Montcalm's aid upon hearing that the English had reached the Plains of Abraham, showing up in the rear with fifteen hundred men. Fortunately for the English, both the right wing of the French, as well as their left and center, had been completely routed and driven off the battlefield. When two battalions and two pieces of artillery moved toward Bougainville, he withdrew; Townshend decided it wasn’t wise to jeopardize the crucial advantages already secured by chasing this new group of troops through challenging terrain.[174]

In this decisive battle, nearly equal numbers appear to have been engaged. The English however possessed this immense advantage:—they were all veterans; while not more than half the French were of the same description. This circumstance would lead to an opinion that some motive, not well explained, must have induced Montcalm to hazard an action before he was assured of being joined by Bougainville.

In this crucial battle, nearly the same number of troops were involved. However, the English had a significant advantage: all of them were seasoned veterans, while only about half of the French troops had similar experience. This situation suggests that there must have been some unclear reason that drove Montcalm to take action before he was certain of being supported by Bougainville.

The French regulars were almost entirely cut to pieces. The loss of the English was not so considerable as the fierceness of the action would indicate. The killed and wounded were less than six hundred men; but among the former, was the commander in chief. This gallant officer, whose rare merit, and lamented fate, have presented a rich theme for panegyric to both the poet and historian, received a ball in his wrist in the commencement of the action; but, wrapping a handkerchief around his arm, he continued to encourage his troops. Soon afterwards he received a shot in the groin, which he also concealed; and was advancing at the head of the grenadiers, when a third bullet pierced his breast. Though expiring, it was with reluctance he permitted himself to be carried into the rear, where he displayed, in the agonies of death, the most anxious solicitude concerning the fate of the day. Being told that the enemy was visibly broken, he reclined his head, from extreme faintness, on the arm of an officer standing near him; but was soon roused with the distant cry of "they fly, they fly." "Who fly?" exclaimed the dying hero. On being answered "the French." "Then," said he, "I depart content;" and, almost immediately expired. "A death more glorious," adds Mr. Belsham, "and attended with circumstances more picturesque and interesting, is no where to be found in the annals of history."

The French regulars were almost completely wiped out. The English losses weren't as significant as the intensity of the battle would suggest. The killed and wounded were fewer than six hundred men; however, among the dead was the commander in chief. This brave officer, whose exceptional qualities and tragic fate have inspired much praise from both poets and historians, was hit in the wrist at the start of the fight. But, wrapping a handkerchief around his arm, he kept encouraging his troops. Shortly after, he was shot in the groin, which he also hid; he was advancing at the front of the grenadiers when a third bullet struck his chest. Even as he was dying, he hesitated to allow himself to be moved to the rear, where, despite his suffering, he showed deep concern for the outcome of the battle. When he was told that the enemy was clearly broken, he leaned his head, from extreme weakness, on the arm of an officer nearby; but he was soon stirred by the distant cries of "they're fleeing, they're fleeing." "Who’s fleeing?" shouted the dying hero. When informed, "the French," he replied, "Then I die satisfied;" and almost instantly passed away. "A death more glorious," adds Mr. Belsham, "and accompanied by circumstances more vivid and compelling, is not found anywhere in the records of history."

The less fortunate, but not less gallant Montcalm expired on the same day. The same love of glory, and the same fearlessness of death, which so remarkably distinguished the British hero, were equally conspicuous in his competitor for victory and for fame. He expressed the highest satisfaction on hearing that his wound was mortal; and when told that he could survive only a few hours, quickly replied, "so much the better, I shall not then live to see the surrender of Quebec."[175]

The less fortunate, but just as brave Montcalm passed away on the same day. The same love for glory and fearlessness of death that were so notable in the British hero were also evident in his rival for victory and fame. He expressed great satisfaction upon learning that his wound was fatal; and when he was told he would only survive a few hours, he quickly responded, "so much the better, I won't have to witness the surrender of Quebec."[175]

Quebec capitulates.

The first days after the action were employed by general Townshend in making preparations for the siege of Quebec. But before his batteries were opened, the town capitulated; on condition that the inhabitants should, during the war, be protected in the free exercise of their religion, and the full enjoyment of their civil rights, leaving their future destinies to be decided by the treaty of peace.

The first few days after the action were used by General Townshend to prepare for the siege of Quebec. But before his artillery was set up, the town surrendered, with the condition that the residents would be protected in their religious practices and civil rights during the war, leaving their future to be determined by the peace treaty.

Quebec was garrisoned by about five thousand English, under the command of general Murray; and the fleet sailed from the St. Lawrence.

Quebec was occupied by about five thousand English troops, led by General Murray, and the fleet departed from the St. Lawrence.

The English minister, aware of the importance of completing the work thus fortunately begun, was not of a temper to relax his exertions. His letters to the governors of the several colonies contained declarations of his intention to employ a strong military force for the ensuing year, and exhortations to them to continue their efforts for the annihilation of the French power in Canada. These exhortations were accompanied with assurances that he would again apply to parliament to reimburse their future extraordinary expenses; and were productive of the desired effect. The several assemblies voted the same number of troops, and amount of supplies, as had been furnished the preceding year.

The English minister, recognizing how crucial it was to finish the work that had started so well, was not someone who would ease up on his efforts. His letters to the governors of the various colonies included statements of his plan to use a strong military force in the coming year, along with encouragement for them to keep pushing to eliminate French power in Canada. These messages also included promises that he would once again ask parliament to cover their future extra expenses, which had the intended impact. The different assemblies approved the same number of troops and supplies as had been provided the previous year.

In the mean time the governor of New France, and the general of the army, made great exertions to retrieve their affairs, and to avert the ruin which threatened them.

In the meantime, the governor of New France and the army general worked hard to turn things around and prevent the disaster that loomed over them.

The remaining European troops were collected about Montreal; where they were reinforced with six thousand militia, and a body of Indians. Monsieur de Levi, on whom the command had devolved, determined to attempt the recovery of Quebec, before the opening of the St. Lawrence should enable the English to reinforce the garrison, and to afford it the protection of their fleet. But the out-posts being found too strong to admit of his carrying the place by a coup de main, he was under the necessity of postponing the execution of this design, until the upper part of the St. Lawrence should open, and afford a transportation by water, for his artillery and military stores.

The remaining European troops gathered around Montreal, where they were joined by six thousand militia and a group of Indians. Monsieur de Levi, who had taken command, decided to try to reclaim Quebec before the St. Lawrence River opened up, allowing the English to reinforce their garrison and protect it with their fleet. However, the outposts were too strong for him to take the place by surprise, so he had to postpone this plan until the upper part of the St. Lawrence opened up, providing a way to transport his artillery and military supplies by water.

1760

In the month of April these were embarked at Montreal, under convoy of six frigates; which, sailing down the St. Lawrence, while the army marched by land, reached Point au Tremble in ten days.

In April, these were loaded onto ships in Montreal, protected by six frigates. They sailed down the St. Lawrence River while the army marched overland, arriving at Point au Tremble in ten days.

To avoid the hardships and dangers of a siege in a town too extensive to be defended by his sickly garrison, and inhabited by persons known to be hostile, Murray took the bold resolution of hazarding a battle. Having formed this determination, he led out his garrison to the heights of Abraham, Battle near Sillery.and attacked the French near Sillery. He was received with unexpected firmness; and, perceiving that his utmost efforts could make no impression, he called off his army, and retired into the city. In this fierce encounter, the English loss amounted to near one thousand men; and they represent that of the French to have been not less considerable.

To avoid the struggles and risks of a siege in a town too large to be defended by his weak garrison, and filled with people known to be unfriendly, Murray boldly decided to take the chance of a battle. Having made this decision, he marched his troops to the Heights of Abraham, Battle near Sillery. and attacked the French near Sillery. He was met with unexpected resilience; and realizing that his best efforts had no effect, he withdrew his army and retreated into the city. In this intense clash, the English lost nearly a thousand men, and they claim that the French losses were also significant.

Quebec besieged.

Monsieur de Levi improved his victory to the utmost. His trenches were opened before the town, on the same evening; but such was the difficulty of bringing up his heavy artillery, that near a fortnight elapsed before he could mount his batteries, and bring his guns to bear on the city. The batteries had been opened but a few days, when the garrison was relieved from its perilous situation, by the arrival of a British fleet.

Monsieur de Levi made the most of his victory. That same evening, he opened trenches in front of the town, but it took nearly two weeks to get his heavy artillery into position because of the challenges involved. Just a few days after the batteries were set up, the garrison was saved from its dangerous situation by the arrival of a British fleet.

Quebec being secure, Monsieur de Levi raised the siege, and retired to Montreal.

Quebec being secure, Mr. de Levi lifted the siege and headed back to Montreal.

During these transactions, general Amherst was taking measures for the annihilation of the remnant of French power in Canada. He determined to employ the immense force under his command for the accomplishment of this object, and made arrangements, during the winter, to bring the armies from Quebec, lake Champlain, and lake Ontario, to act against Montreal.

During these operations, General Amherst was taking steps to completely eliminate any remaining French influence in Canada. He decided to use the enormous force at his disposal to achieve this goal and made plans over the winter to bring the armies from Quebec, Lake Champlain, and Lake Ontario to launch an attack on Montreal.

The preparations being completed, the commander in chief marched at the head of upwards of ten thousand British and provincials, from the frontiers of New York to Oswego, where he was joined by sir William Johnson, with one thousand Indians. He embarked his army at that place, and proceeded down the St. Lawrence to Montreal.

The preparations were finished, and the commander in chief led over ten thousand British soldiers and colonial troops from the New York frontier to Oswego, where he was joined by Sir William Johnson and a thousand Native Americans. He loaded his army onto boats at that location and moved down the St. Lawrence River to Montreal.

Murray, who had been directed to advance up the river to the same point, with as many men as could be spared from Quebec, appeared below the town on the very day that Amherst approached it from above. The two generals found no difficulty in disembarking their troops, and the whole plan of co-operation had been so well concerted that, in a short time, they were joined by colonel Haviland with the detachment from Crown Point.

Murray, who had been told to move up the river to the same spot with as many men as could be spared from Quebec, showed up below the town on the exact day that Amherst approached it from above. The two generals had no trouble landing their troops, and the entire plan for coordination had been arranged so well that, shortly after, they were joined by Colonel Haviland and his detachment from Crown Point.

Montreal capitulates.

The junction of these armies presenting before Montreal a force not to be resisted, the governor offered to capitulate. In the month of September, Montreal, and all other places within the government of Canada, then remaining in the possession of France, were surrendered to his Britannic majesty. The troops were to be transported to France, and the Canadians to be protected in their property, and the full enjoyment of their religion.[176]

The convergence of these armies in front of Montreal created an unstoppable force, prompting the governor to agree to surrender. In September, Montreal and all other areas still under French control in Canada were handed over to his Britannic Majesty. The troops were to be shipped back to France, and the Canadians were promised protection for their property and the full enjoyment of their religion.[176]

That colossal power, which France had been long erecting in America, with vast labour and expense; which had been the motive for one of the most extensive and desolating wars of modern times; was thus entirely overthrown. The causes of this interesting event are to be found in the superior wealth and population of the colonies of England, and in her immense naval strength; an advantage, in distant war, not to be counterbalanced by the numbers, the discipline, the courage, and the military talents, which may be combined in the armies of an inferior maritime power.

That massive power that France had been building up in America for a long time, with great effort and expense, and which had led to one of the most extensive and devastating wars of modern times, was completely toppled. The reasons for this important event lie in the greater wealth and population of the English colonies, as well as in England's immense naval strength. This advantage in distant warfare cannot be offset by the numbers, discipline, courage, and military skills that can be found in the armies of a weaker maritime power.

 

Death of Wolfe

Death of Wolfe

The Death of Wolfe on the Plains of Abraham

The Death of Wolfe on the Plains of Abraham

From the painting by Benjamin West, in the Capitol at Ottawa, Canada

From the painting by Benjamin West, in the Capitol in Ottawa, Canada

Surrounded by his devoted officers, General James Wolfe died in the hour of victory over the French General Montcalm, in which the English captured Quebec, September 13, 1759, and decided the destiny of North American civilization. General Wolfe lived to hear the cry "They run!", and expired with the words "Now God be praised, I will die in peace."

Surrounded by his loyal officers, General James Wolfe died at the moment of victory over the French General Montcalm, when the English captured Quebec on September 13, 1759, shaping the future of North American civilization. General Wolfe lived to hear the shout "They're retreating!" and passed away with the words "Now God be praised, I can die in peace."

In this canvas, painted in 1771, West departed from the venerated custom of clothing pictorial characters in Greek or Roman costume. Sir Joshua Reynolds, who had endeavored to dissuade him, later said, "I retract my objections. I foresee that this picture will not only become one of the most popular, but will occasion a revolution in art."

In this painting, created in 1771, West moved away from the traditional practice of dressing characters in Greek or Roman attire. Sir Joshua Reynolds, who had tried to convince him not to, later remarked, "I take back my objections. I can see that this artwork will not only become extremely popular but will also lead to a revolution in art."

 

The joy diffused throughout the British dominions by this splendid conquest, was mingled with a proud sense of superiority which did not estimate with exact justice, the relative means employed by the belligerents. In no part of those dominions was this joy felt, in a higher degree, or with more reason, than in America. In that region, the wars between France and England had assumed a form, happily unknown to other parts of the civilised world. Not confined, as in Europe, to men in arms; women and children were its common victims. It had been carried by the savage to the fire side of the peaceful peasant, where the tomahawk and scalping knife were applied indiscriminately to every age, and to either sex. The hope was now fondly indulged that these scenes, at least in the northern and middle colonies, were closed for ever.

The joy spread throughout the British territories because of this amazing victory was mixed with a proud sense of superiority that didn't fairly consider the relative strength of the opposing sides. No part of those territories felt this joy more intensely or justifiably than America. In that region, the wars between France and England had taken on a form that was happily unknown to other parts of the civilized world. Instead of being limited, as in Europe, to soldiers fighting, women and children were common victims. The conflict had reached the homes of peaceful farmers, where the tomahawk and scalping knife were used indiscriminately on everyone, regardless of age or gender. There was now a hopeful belief that these kinds of scenes, at least in the northern and middle colonies, were finished for good.

The colonies of South Carolina and Georgia had been entirely exempted from the sharp conflicts of the north. France having been unable to draw Spain into the war, their neighbours in Florida remained quiet; and the Indians on their immediate frontiers were in the English interest. As the prospect of establishing peace in the north seemed to brighten, this state of repose in the south sustained a short interruption.

The colonies of South Carolina and Georgia had been completely free from the intense conflicts of the north. France was unable to draw Spain into the war, so their neighbors in Florida stayed calm; and the Native Americans on their immediate borders were aligned with the English. As the chance of achieving peace in the north began to improve, this period of calm in the south experienced a brief disruption.

When the garrison of fort Du Quêsne retired down the Ohio into Louisiana, the French employed their address in the management of Indians, to draw the Cherokees from their alliance with Great Britain. Their negotiations with these savages were favoured by the irritations given to their warriors in Virginia, where they had been employed against the French, and the Indians in the French interest.

When the soldiers at Fort Du Quêsne retreated down the Ohio into Louisiana, the French used their skills in dealing with Native Americans to pull the Cherokees away from their alliance with Great Britain. Their talks with these tribes were helped by the tensions faced by their warriors in Virginia, where they had been used against the French and the Native Americans who supported the French.

Their ill humour began to show itself in 1759. Upon its first appearance, governor Lyttleton prepared to march into their country at the head of a respectable military force. Alarmed at these hostile appearances, they dispatched thirty-two of their chiefs to Charleston, for the purpose of deprecating the vengeance with which their nation was threatened. Their pacific representations did not arrest the expedition. The governor not only persisted in the enterprise, but, under the pretext of securing the safe return of the Indian messengers, took them into the train of his army, where they were, in reality, confined as prisoners. To add to this indignity, they were, when arrived at the place of destination, shut up together in a single hut.

Their bad mood started to show in 1759. When it first appeared, Governor Lyttleton got ready to march into their territory with a decent military force. Alarmed by these aggressive signs, they sent thirty-two of their chiefs to Charleston to plead against the punishment their nation faced. Their peaceful appeals didn’t stop the expedition. The governor not only went ahead with the plan but, claiming it was to ensure the safe return of the Indian messengers, brought them along with his army, where they were effectively held as prisoners. To add to this humiliation, when they arrived at their destination, they were all locked up together in a single hut.

Notwithstanding the irritation excited by this conduct, a treaty was concluded, in which it was agreed that the chiefs detained by the governor should remain with him as hostages, until an equal number of those who had committed murder on the frontiers, should be delivered in exchange for them; and that, in the meantime, the Indians should seize and deliver up every white or red man coming into their country, who should endeavour to excite them to war against the English. After making this accommodation, the governor returned to Charleston, leaving his hostages prisoners in fort Prince George.

Despite the annoyance caused by this behavior, a treaty was reached, agreeing that the chiefs held by the governor would stay with him as hostages until an equal number of those responsible for murders at the borders were handed over in exchange. In the meantime, the Indigenous people were to capture and turn over any white or red man entering their territory who attempted to persuade them to fight against the English. After finalizing this arrangement, the governor returned to Charleston, leaving his hostages imprisoned at Fort Prince George.

Scarcely had the army retired, when the Cherokees began to contrive plans for the relief of their chiefs. In an attempt to execute these plans, they killed the captain of the fort and wounded two officers. Orders were immediately given to put the hostages in irons; an indignity so resented by these fierce savages, that the first persons who attempted to execute the orders were stabbed. The soldiers enraged at this resistance, fell on the hostages and massacred them.

Scarcely had the army pulled back when the Cherokees started devising plans to rescue their chiefs. In trying to carry out these plans, they killed the captain of the fort and injured two officers. Orders were quickly issued to put the hostages in chains; an insult so deeply angered these fierce warriors that the first people who tried to carry out the orders were stabbed. The soldiers, furious at this resistance, turned on the hostages and slaughtered them.

War with the southern Indians.

Inflamed to madness by this event, the whole nation flew to arms; and, according to their established mode of warfare, wreaked their fury on the inhabitants of the country in indiscriminate murder.

Inflamed to madness by this event, the whole nation took up arms; and, following their usual way of fighting, unleashed their rage on the people of the country in random acts of murder.

Mr. Bull, on whom the government of the province had devolved, represented the distresses of South Carolina in such strong terms to general Amherst, that colonel Montgomery was ordered into that colony with a detachment of regular troops. He arrived in April; but, as all the forces would be required in the north, in order to complete the conquest of Canada, he was directed to strike a sudden blow, and to return to New York in time for the expedition against Montreal.

Mr. Bull, who was in charge of the province's government, described the struggles in South Carolina to General Amherst so urgently that Colonel Montgomery was sent there with a group of regular troops. He arrived in April; however, since all the forces were needed up north to finish conquering Canada, he was instructed to deliver a quick strike and return to New York in time for the mission against Montreal.

The utmost exertions were made by the colony in aid of colonel Montgomery, and he entered the Cherokee country with all the forces that could be collected. Their lower towns were destroyed; Battle near Etchoe.but, near the village of Etchoe, the first of their middle settlements, in an almost impenetrable wood, he was met by a large body of savages, and a severe action ensued. The English claimed the victory, but without much reason. They were so roughly handled, that colonel Montgomery withdrew his army, and retired to fort Prince George, at which place he prepared to embark for New York.

The colony put in a tremendous effort to support Colonel Montgomery, who entered Cherokee territory with all the forces he could gather. They destroyed the lower towns; Battle near Etchoe. however, near the village of Etchoe, the first of their middle settlements, he was confronted by a large group of Native Americans, leading to a fierce battle. The English claimed victory, but their reasons were weak. They suffered significant losses, prompting Colonel Montgomery to pull back his army and retreat to Fort Prince George, where he got ready to sail to New York.

The consternation of the province was the greater, as serious fears were entertained that the Creeks and Choctaws, might be induced by the French to join the Cherokees. Colonel Montgomery was pressed in the most earnest manner, not to leave the province; and was, with difficulty, prevailed on to permit four companies to remain, while, with the main body of his detachment, he returned to New York.

The worry in the province grew even more intense, as there were serious concerns that the Creeks and Choctaws might be persuaded by the French to ally with the Cherokees. Colonel Montgomery was urged strongly not to leave the province; he reluctantly agreed to let four companies stay while he took the main part of his group back to New York.

1761

Mean while, the war continued to rage. The savages surrounded fort Loudoun; and the garrison amounting to four hundred men, was compelled by famine to surrender, on condition of being permitted to march into the settlements. The Indians, who regard conventions no longer than they are useful, attacked the garrison on its march, killed a number, and made the residue prisoners. Carolina again applied to general Amherst for assistance, who having completed the conquest of Canada, had leisure to attend to the southern colonies. Late in May, a strong detachment, commanded by colonel Grant, arrived at fort Prince George; and the colony raised a body of provincials, and of friendly Indians, to join him.

Meanwhile, the war continued to rage. The savages surrounded Fort Loudoun, and the garrison, made up of four hundred men, was forced by hunger to surrender, on the condition that they would be allowed to march into the settlements. The Indians, who care about agreements only as long as they're beneficial, attacked the garrison during its march, killed several, and took the rest prisoner. Carolina once again asked General Amherst for help, who, having finished the conquest of Canada, had time to focus on the southern colonies. Late in May, a strong detachment led by Colonel Grant arrived at Fort Prince George, and the colony raised a force of provincial soldiers and friendly Indians to join him.

Early in June, he marched for the Cherokee towns. Near the place where the action had been fought the preceding year by Montgomery, the Indians again assembled in force, and gave battle in defence of their country. The action commenced about eight in the morning, and was maintained with spirit until eleven, when the Cherokees began to give way. They were pursued for two or three hours, after which Grant marched to the adjacent village of Etchoe, which he reduced to ashes. Indians defeated.All the towns of the middle settlement shared the same fate. Their houses and corn fields were destroyed, and the whole country laid waste. Reduced to extremity, they sued sincerely for peace; and, in the course of the summer, the war was terminated by a treaty.[177]

Early in June, he marched towards the Cherokee towns. Near the site of last year's battle fought by Montgomery, the Indians gathered in large numbers and fought to defend their land. The battle started around eight in the morning and went on intensely until eleven, when the Cherokees began to falter. They were chased for two or three hours, after which Grant moved to the nearby village of Etchoe and set it on fire. Indians lost. All the towns in the middle settlement met the same fate. Their homes and cornfields were destroyed, leaving the entire area in ruins. Driven to desperation, they earnestly sought peace; and by the end of summer, the war was concluded with a treaty.[177]

It was not in America only that the vigour presiding in the councils of Britain shed lustre on the British arms. Splendid conquests were also made in Asia and Africa; and in Europe, her aids of men and money enabled the greatest monarch of his age to surmount difficulties which only Frederick and Mr. Pitt could have dared to encounter.

It wasn't just in America that the energy driving the decisions in Britain illuminated the British military. Impressive victories were also achieved in Asia and Africa; and in Europe, her support of troops and funds allowed the most powerful king of his time to overcome challenges that only Frederick and Mr. Pitt would have dared to face.

1762

At length, Spain, alarmed at the increase of British power in America, and apprehensive for the safety of her own dominions, determined to take part against Great Britain; and, early in the year 1762, the two crowns declared war against each other. It was prosecuted, on the part of Great Britain, with signal success; and, in the course of the year, Martinique, Granada, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, and all the Caribbee Islands were wrested from France; and the very important city of Havanna, which in a great degree commands the gulf of Mexico, was taken from Spain.

At last, Spain, worried about the rise of British power in America and concerned for the safety of its own territories, decided to join the fight against Great Britain. Early in 1762, the two crowns declared war on each other. Great Britain pursued the war with considerable success, and over the course of the year, they seized Martinique, Grenada, St. Lucia, St. Vincent, and all the Caribbean Islands from France, as well as the crucial city of Havana, which largely controls the Gulf of Mexico, from Spain.

This course of conquest, which no force in possession of France and Spain seemed capable of checking, while any of their distant possessions remained to be subdued, was arrested by preliminary articles of peace signed at Paris.

This campaign of conquest, which no power in control of France and Spain appeared able to stop, as long as any of their far-off territories were left to be conquered, was halted by initial peace agreements signed in Paris.

By this treaty, his Christian Majesty ceded to Britain, all the conquests made by that power on the continent of North America, together with the river and port of Mobile; and all the territory to which France was entitled on the left bank of the Mississippi, reserving only the island of New Orleans. And it was agreed that, for the future, the confines between the dominions of the two crowns, in that quarter of the world, should be irrevocably fixed by a line drawn along the middle of the Mississippi, from its source as far as the river Iberville, and thence, by a line drawn along the middle of that river, and of the lakes Maurepas and Pont Chartrain.

By this treaty, his Christian Majesty transferred to Britain all the territories it conquered in North America, including the river and port of Mobile, along with all the land France was entitled to on the left bank of the Mississippi, keeping only the island of New Orleans. It was also agreed that, moving forward, the borders between the two crowns' territories in that part of the world should be permanently established by a line running down the middle of the Mississippi from its source to the Iberville River, and then along the middle of that river and the lakes Maurepas and Pontchartrain.

The Havanna was exchanged with Spain for the Floridas. By establishing these great natural boundaries to the British empire in North America, all causes of future contest respecting that continent, with any potentate of Europe, were supposed to be removed.

The Havanna was exchanged with Spain for Florida. By setting these significant natural borders for the British Empire in North America, it was believed that all reasons for future disputes regarding that continent with any European power were eliminated.


CHAPTER XIII.

Opinions on the supremacy of parliament, and its right to tax the colonies.... The stamp act.... Congress at New York.... Violence in the towns.... Change of administration.... Stamp act repealed.... Opposition to the mutiny act.... Act imposing duties on tea, &c. resisted in America.... Letters from the assembly of Massachusetts to members of the administration.... Petition to the King.... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies.... Letter from the earl of Hillsborough.... Assembly of Massachusetts dissolved.... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty.... Convention at Fanueil Hall.... Moderation of its proceedings.... Two British regiments arrive at Boston.... Resolutions of the house of Burgesses of Virginia.... Assembly dissolved.... The members form an association.... General measures against importation.... General court convened in Massachusetts.... Its proceedings.... Is prorogued.... Duties, except that on tea, repealed.... Circular letter of the earl of Hillsborough.... New York recedes from the non-importation agreement in part.... Her example followed.... Riot in Boston.... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

Views on the dominance of Parliament and its right to tax the colonies... The Stamp Act... Congress in New York... Violence in the towns... Change in leadership... The Stamp Act is repealed... Opposition to the Mutiny Act... The Act imposing duties on tea, etc., resisted in America... Letters from the Massachusetts Assembly to members of the administration... Petition to the King... Circular letter to the colonial assemblies... Letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... Massachusetts Assembly is dissolved... Seizure of the Sloop Liberty... Convention at Fanueil Hall... Moderation of its actions... Two British regiments arrive in Boston... Resolutions from the Virginia House of Burgesses... Assembly is dissolved... Members form an association... General measures against importation... General Court convened in Massachusetts... Its actions... Is prorogued... Duties, except for tea, are repealed... Circular letter from the Earl of Hillsborough... New York partially retreats from the non-importation agreement... Her example is followed... Riot in Boston... Trial and acquittal of Captain Preston.

 

1763

The attachment of the colonies to the mother country was never stronger than at the signature of the treaty of Paris.[178] The union of that tract of country which extends from the Atlantic to the Mississippi, and from the gulf of Mexico to the north pole, was deemed a certain guarantee of future peace, and an effectual security against the return of those bloody scenes from which no condition in life could afford an exemption.

The colonies' connection to the mother country was never stronger than when the Treaty of Paris was signed.[178] The unification of this land stretching from the Atlantic to the Mississippi and from the Gulf of Mexico to the North Pole was seen as a sure way to ensure future peace and a solid protection against the violent conflicts that could affect anyone, no matter their status in life.

This state of things, long and anxiously wished for by British America, had, at length, been effected by the union of British and American arms. The soldiers of the parent state and her colonies had co-operated in the same service, their blood had mingled in the same plains, and the object pursued was common to both people.

This situation, which had been long and eagerly hoped for by British America, was finally achieved through the collaboration of British and American forces. Soldiers from the mother country and her colonies worked together, their blood mixing on the same battlegrounds, united by a shared goal.

While the British nation was endeared to the Americans by this community of danger, and identity of interest, the brilliant achievements of the war had exalted to enthusiasm their admiration of British valour. They were proud of the land of their ancestors, and gloried in their descent from Englishmen. But this sentiment was not confined to the military character of the nation. While the excellence of the English constitution was a rich theme of declamation, every colonist believed himself entitled to its advantages; nor could he admit that, by crossing the Atlantic, his ancestors had relinquished the essential rights of British subjects.

While the British nation gained the affection of Americans through their shared dangers and common interests, the impressive achievements of the war boosted their admiration for British bravery to new heights. They took pride in their ancestral homeland and celebrated their English heritage. However, this feeling wasn’t limited to the military aspects of the nation. The greatness of the English constitution was a popular topic of discussion, and every colonist felt entitled to its benefits; they could not accept that their ancestors had given up the fundamental rights of British subjects by moving across the Atlantic.

The degree of authority which might rightfully be exercised by the mother country over her colonies, had never been accurately defined. In Britain, it had always been asserted that Parliament possessed the power of binding them in all cases whatever. In America, at different times, and in different provinces, different opinions had been entertained on this subject.

The extent of authority that the mother country could legitimately assert over her colonies was never clearly defined. In Britain, it was consistently claimed that Parliament had the power to govern them in all matters. In America, at various times and in different regions, there were varying opinions on this issue.

In New England, originally settled by republicans, habits of independence had nourished the theory that the colonial assemblies possessed every legislative power not surrendered by compact; that the Americans were subjects of the British crown, but not of the nation; and were bound by no laws to which their representatives had not assented. From this high ground they had been compelled reluctantly to recede. The Judges, being generally appointed by the governors with the advice of council, had determined that the colonies were bound by acts of parliament which concerned them, and which were expressly extended to them; and the general court of Massachusetts had, on a late occasion, explicitly recognised the same principle. This had probably become the opinion of many of the best informed men of the province; but the doctrine seems still to have been extensively maintained, that acts of parliament possessed only an external obligation; that they might regulate commerce, but not the internal affairs of the colonies.

In New England, which was initially settled by republicans, a sense of independence led to the belief that the colonial assemblies had all legislative power not given up by agreement; that Americans were subjects of the British crown, but not of the nation; and that they were not bound by any laws that their representatives had not agreed to. From this strong position, they were reluctantly forced to step back. The judges, usually appointed by the governors with the council's advice, decided that the colonies were subject to acts of parliament that applied to them and were specifically extended to them; the Massachusetts General Court had recently acknowledged this same principle. This was likely accepted by many of the most educated people in the province; however, the belief still seemed widespread that acts of parliament had only an external obligation; that they could regulate trade but not the internal matters of the colonies.

In the year 1692, the general court of Massachusetts passed an act, denying the right of any other legislature to impose any tax whatever on the colony; and also asserting those principles of national liberty, which are found in Magna Charta. Not long afterwards, the legislature of New York, probably with a view only to the authority claimed by the governor, passed an act in which its own supremacy, not only in matters of taxation, but of general legislation, is expressly affirmed. Both these acts however were disapproved in England; and the parliament asserted its authority, in 1696, by declaring "that all laws, bye laws, usages, and customs, which shall be in practice in any of the plantations, repugnant to any law made or to be made in this kingdom relative to the said plantations, shall be void and of none effect." And three years afterwards, an act was passed for the trial of pirates in America, in which is to be found the following extraordinary clause: "Be it farther declared that, if any of the governors, or any person or persons in authority there, shall refuse to yield obedience to this act, such refusal is hereby declared to be a forfeiture of all and every [sic] the charters granted for the government and propriety of such plantations."

In 1692, the general court of Massachusetts passed a law that denied any other legislature the right to impose any taxes on the colony and also stated principles of national liberty found in the Magna Carta. Soon after, the legislature of New York, likely aiming to assert the authority claimed by the governor, passed a law affirming its own supremacy in matters of taxation and general legislation. However, both these laws were disapproved in England, where the parliament asserted its authority in 1696 by declaring that "all laws, bye laws, usages, and customs, which shall be in practice in any of the plantations, repugnant to any law made or to be made in this kingdom relative to the said plantations, shall be void and of none effect." Three years later, a law was passed for the trial of pirates in America, which included an extraordinary clause: "Be it further declared that, if any of the governors, or any person or persons in authority there, shall refuse to yield obedience to this act, such refusal is hereby declared to be a forfeiture of all and every [sic] the charters granted for the government and propriety of such plantations."

The English statute book furnishes many instances in which the legislative power of parliament over the colonies was extended to regulations completely internal; and it is not recollected that their authority was in any case openly controverted.

The English statute book provides many examples where Parliament's legislative power over the colonies included completely internal regulations, and there’s no record of their authority being openly challenged in any case.

In the middle and southern provinces, no question respecting the supremacy of parliament, in matters of general legislation, ever existed. The authority of such acts of internal regulation as were made for America, as well as of those for the regulation of commerce, even by the imposition of duties, provided those duties were imposed for the purpose of regulation, had been at all times admitted. But these colonies, however they might acknowledge the supremacy of parliament in other respects, denied the right of that body to tax them internally.

In the middle and southern provinces, there was never any doubt about the authority of Parliament regarding general legislation. The power of internal regulations made for America, as well as those for regulating commerce, including duties, was always accepted, as long as those duties were intended for regulation. However, these colonies, while they might recognize Parliament's authority in other areas, rejected the idea that Parliament had the right to impose internal taxes on them.

Their submission to the act for establishing a general post office, which raised a revenue on the carriage of letters, was not thought a dereliction of this principle; because that regulation was not considered as a tax, but as a compensation for a service rendered, which every person might accept or decline. And all the duties on trade were understood to be imposed, rather with a view to prevent foreign commerce, than to raise a revenue. Perhaps the legality of such acts was the less questioned, because they were not rigorously executed, and their violation was sometimes designedly overlooked. A scheme for taxing the colonies by authority of parliament had been formed so early as the year 1739, and recommended to government by a club of American merchants, at whose head was sir William Keith, governor of Pennsylvania. In this scheme, it was proposed to raise a body of regulars, to be stationed along the western frontier of the British settlements, for the protection of the Indian traders; the expense of which establishment was to be paid with monies arising from a duty on stamped paper and parchment in all the colonies. This plan, however, was not countenanced by those in power; and seems never to have been seriously taken up by the government until the year 1754. The attention of the minister was then turned to a plan of taxation by authority of parliament; and it will be recollected that a system was devised and recommended by him, as a substitute for the articles of union proposed by the convention at Albany. The temper and opinion of the colonists, and the impolicy of irritating them at a crisis which required all the exertions they were capable of making, suspended this delicate and dangerous measure; but it seems not to have been totally abandoned. Of the right of parliament, as the supreme legislature, of the nation, to tax as well as govern the colonies, those who guided the councils of Britain seem not to have entertained a doubt; and the language of men in power, on more than one occasion through the war, indicated a disposition to put this right in practice when the termination of hostilities should render the experiment less dangerous. The failure of some of the colonies, especially those in which a proprietary government was established, to furnish, in time, the aids required of them, contributed to foster this disposition. This opposition of opinion on a subject the most interesting to the human heart, was about to produce a system of measures which tore asunder all the bonds of relationship and affection that had subsisted for ages, and planted almost inextinguishable hatred in bosoms where the warmest friendship had long been cultivated.

Their agreement to the act for creating a general post office, which charged fees for delivering letters, wasn’t seen as abandoning this principle; because that rule was regarded as a payment for a service provided, one that anyone could choose to accept or reject. All the trade duties were seen as being put in place more to limit foreign trade than to generate revenue. The legality of such actions was less contested because they were not strictly enforced, and their violations were sometimes intentionally ignored. A plan to tax the colonies with the authority of parliament was proposed as early as 1739, recommended to the government by a group of American merchants led by Sir William Keith, the governor of Pennsylvania. This plan suggested raising a regular army to be stationed along the western frontier of the British settlements to protect Indian traders; the costs of this setup were to be covered by a tax on stamped paper and parchment in all the colonies. However, this idea was not supported by those in power and doesn't seem to have been seriously pursued by the government until 1754. That’s when the minister shifted focus to a taxation plan authorized by parliament; it should be noted that he devised and recommended a system as an alternative to the union articles proposed by the convention in Albany. The mood and views of the colonists, along with the imprudence of provoking them at a time that required all their efforts, halted this sensitive and risky measure, but it doesn’t appear to have been completely abandoned. Those guiding the councils of Britain seemed to have no doubts about parliament’s right, as the supreme legislature of the nation, to tax and govern the colonies; the statements of powerful figures throughout the war indicated a willingness to implement this right when the end of hostilities made it less risky. The failure of some colonies, particularly those with proprietary governments, to provide the required assistance in a timely manner contributed to this sentiment. This clash of opinions on such a deeply important issue was about to lead to a series of actions that severed all the ties of relationship and affection developed over centuries, instilling almost unquenchable hatred in hearts that had long nurtured the deepest friendship.

1764

The unexampled expenses of the war required a great addition to the regular taxes of the nation. Considerable difficulty was found in searching out new sources of revenue, and great opposition was made to every tax proposed. Thus embarrassed, administration directed its attention to the continent of North America. The system which had been laid aside was renewed; and, on the motion of Mr. Grenville, first commissioner of the treasury, a resolution passed without much debate, declaring that it would be proper to impose certain stamp duties in the colonies and plantations, for the purpose of raising a revenue in America, payable into the British exchequer. This resolution was not carried into immediate effect, and was only declaratory of an intention to be executed the ensuing year.[179]

The unprecedented costs of the war required a significant increase in the nation's regular taxes. It was quite challenging to find new sources of revenue, and there was strong opposition to every proposed tax. In this difficult situation, the administration turned its focus to the continent of North America. A system that had previously been put aside was brought back; and at the suggestion of Mr. Grenville, the first commissioner of the treasury, a resolution was passed with little debate, stating that it would be appropriate to impose certain stamp duties in the colonies and plantations to raise revenue in America, payable to the British treasury. This resolution was not implemented immediately and simply expressed an intention to execute it in the following year.[179]

Other resolutions were passed at the same time, laying new duties on the trade of the colonies, which being in the form of commercial regulations, were not generally contested on the ground of right, though imposed expressly for the purpose of raising revenue. Great disgust, however, was produced by the increase of the duties, by the new regulations which were made, and by the manner in which those regulations were to be executed. The gainful commerce long carried on clandestinely with the French and Spanish colonies, in the progress of which an evasion of the duties imposed by law had been overlooked by the government, was to be rigorously suppressed by taxes amounting to a prohibition of fair trade; and their exact collection was to be enforced by measures not much less offensive in themselves, than on account of the object to be effected.[180]

Other resolutions were passed at the same time, placing new responsibilities on the trade of the colonies. Because these were in the form of commercial regulations, they weren't usually challenged on the grounds of rights, even though they were specifically designed to raise revenue. However, the increase in duties, the new regulations, and the way those regulations were to be enforced caused a lot of frustration. The profitable trade that had long been secretly conducted with the French and Spanish colonies, which had previously been ignored by the government regarding duty evasion, was now going to be strictly limited by taxes that effectively prohibited fair trade. The enforcement of these taxes was also to be carried out through measures that were offensive both in nature and due to the goals they intended to achieve.[180]

Completely to prevent smuggling, all the officers in the sea service, who were on the American station, were converted into revenue officers; and directed to take the custom house oaths. Many vexatious seizures were made, for which no redress could be obtained but in England. The penalties and forfeitures, too, accruing under the act, as if the usual tribunals could not be trusted, were made recoverable in any court of vice-admiralty in the colonies. It will be readily conceived how odious a law, made to effect an odious object, must have been rendered by such provisions as these.

To completely stop smuggling, all the officers in the naval service stationed in America were turned into customs officers and were required to take the customs oaths. Many troublesome seizures occurred, and there was no way to challenge them except in England. The penalties and forfeitures under the law, assuming that the usual courts couldn't be trusted, were made recoverable in any vice-admiralty court in the colonies. It's easy to see how unpleasant a law created for such a dreadful purpose became with these kinds of provisions.

1765

The resolution concerning the duties on stamps excited a great and general ferment in America. The right of parliament to impose taxes on the colonies for the purpose of raising a revenue, became the subject of universal conversation, and was almost universally denied. Petitions to the King, and memorials to both houses of parliament against the measure, were transmitted by several of the provincial assemblies to the board of trade in England, to be presented to his majesty immediately; and to parliament, when that body should be convened. The house of representatives of Massachusetts instructed their agent to use his utmost endeavours to prevent the passage of the stamp act, or any other act levying taxes or impositions of any kind on the American provinces. A committee was appointed to act in the recess of the general court, with instructions to correspond with the legislatures of the several colonies, to communicate to them the instructions given to the agent of Massachusetts, and to solicit their concurrence in similar measures. These legislative proceedings were, in many places, seconded by associations entered into by individuals, for diminishing the use of British manufactures.[181]

The resolution about the stamp duties stirred up a huge and widespread reaction in America. The right of Parliament to tax the colonies for raising revenue became a topic of widespread discussion, and almost everyone rejected it. Several provincial assemblies sent petitions to the King and memorials to both houses of Parliament against the measure, asking for them to be presented to his majesty right away and to Parliament when it convened. The House of Representatives of Massachusetts instructed their agent to do everything possible to prevent the passage of the Stamp Act or any other law that would impose taxes or fees on the American provinces. A committee was set up to operate during the recess of the general court, with instructions to communicate with the legislatures of the other colonies, share the instructions given to Massachusetts' agent, and seek their support for similar actions. In many areas, these legislative actions were backed by groups formed by individuals aimed at reducing the use of British goods.[181]

The administration, perceiving the opposition to be encountered by adhering to the vote of the preceding session, informed the agents of the colonies in London that, if they would propose any other mode of raising the sum required[182], their proposition would be accepted, and the stamp duty laid aside. The agents replied that they were not authorised to propose any substitute, but were ordered to oppose the bill when it should be brought into the house, by petitions questioning the right of parliament to tax the colonies. This reply placed the controversy on ground which admitted of no compromise. Determined to persevere in the system he had adopted, and believing successful resistance to be impossible, Mr. Grenville brought into parliament his celebrated act for imposing stamp duties in America; and it passed both houses by great majorities, but not without animated debate. So little weight does the human mind allow to the most conclusive arguments, when directed against the existence of power in ourselves, that general Conway is said to have stood alone[183] in denying the right claimed by parliament.

The administration, recognizing the opposition they would face by sticking to the vote from the previous session, informed the colony representatives in London that if they could suggest any other way to raise the needed funds[182], their proposal would be accepted, and the stamp duty would be dropped. The representatives responded that they weren't authorized to suggest any alternatives but were instructed to oppose the bill once it was presented in the house, through petitions that challenged Parliament's right to tax the colonies. This response put the dispute on a level that allowed for no compromise. Determined to stick to his chosen path, and believing that successful resistance was impossible, Mr. Grenville introduced his famous act to impose stamp duties in America to Parliament; it passed both houses with significant majorities, but not without spirited debate. The human mind often gives little weight to even the most convincing arguments when they challenge power that exists within ourselves, as General Conway is said to have stood alone[183] in denying the right claimed by Parliament.

This act excited serious alarm throughout the colonies. It was sincerely believed to wound vitally the constitution of the country, and to destroy the most sacred principles of liberty. Combinations against its execution were formed; and the utmost exertions were used to diffuse among the people a knowledge of the pernicious consequences which must flow from admitting that the colonists could be taxed by a legislature in which they were not represented.

This action raised significant concern across the colonies. People genuinely believed it threatened the very foundation of the country’s constitution and undermined the essential principles of freedom. Groups were organized to resist its implementation, and intense efforts were made to inform the public about the harmful effects that would result from allowing a legislature, where the colonists had no representation, to impose taxes on them.

The assembly of Virginia was in session when the intelligence was received; and, by a small majority, passed several resolutions introduced by Mr. Henry, and seconded by Mr. Johnson,[184] one of which asserts the exclusive right of that assembly to lay taxes and impositions on the inhabitants of that colony.[185]

The Virginia assembly was in session when the news came in; and, by a small majority, they passed several resolutions introduced by Mr. Henry and seconded by Mr. Johnson,[184] one of which claims the sole right of that assembly to impose taxes and fees on the residents of that colony.[185]

On the passage of these resolutions, the governor dissolved the assembly; and writs for new elections were issued. In almost every instance, the members who had voted in favour of the resolutions were re-elected, while those who had voted against them were generally excluded.

On the approval of these resolutions, the governor disbanded the assembly, and new election notices were sent out. In almost every case, the members who supported the resolutions were re-elected, while those who opposed them were usually left out.

The legislatures of several other colonies passed resolutions similar to those of Virginia. The house of representatives of Massachusetts, contemplating a still more solemn and effectual expression of the general sentiment, recommended a congress of deputies from all the colonial assemblies, to meet at New York the first Monday in October. Circular letters communicating this recommendation, were addressed to the respective assemblies wherever they were in session. New Hampshire alone, although concurring in the general opposition, declined sending members to the congress; and the legislatures of Virginia and North Carolina were not in session.[186]

The legislatures of several other colonies passed resolutions similar to those of Virginia. The House of Representatives in Massachusetts, looking for a more serious and effective way to express the general sentiment, suggested a congress of representatives from all the colonial assemblies to meet in New York on the first Monday in October. Circular letters sharing this recommendation were sent to the respective assemblies wherever they were in session. New Hampshire alone, while agreeing with the overall opposition, chose not to send representatives to the congress; and the legislatures of Virginia and North Carolina were not in session.[186]

In the meantime, the press teemed with the most animating exhortations to the people, to unite in defence of their liberty and property; and the stamp officers were, almost universally, compelled to resign.

In the meantime, the press was filled with inspiring calls for people to come together to defend their freedom and property; and the stamp officers were nearly all forced to resign.

Congress at New York.

At the time appointed, the commissioners from the assemblies of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the three lower counties on the Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina assembled at New York; and, having chosen Timothy Ruggles, of Massachusetts, their chairman, proceeded on the important objects for which they had convened. The first measure of congress was a declaration[187] of the rights and grievances of the colonists. This paper asserts their title to all the rights and liberties of natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain; among the most essential of which are, the exclusive power to tax themselves, and the trial by jury.

At the appointed time, the representatives from the assemblies of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the three lower counties on the Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina gathered in New York. They selected Timothy Ruggles from Massachusetts as their chairperson and set to work on the significant issues for which they had come together. The first action of congress was a declaration[187] of the rights and grievances of the colonists. This document asserts their claim to all the rights and freedoms of natural born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain; among the most crucial of these are the exclusive power to tax themselves and the right to a trial by jury.

The act granting certain stamp and other duties in the British colonies was placed first on the list of grievances. Its direct tendency they said, was, by taxing the colonists without their consent, and by extending the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, to subvert their rights and liberties. They also addressed a petition to the King, and a memorial to each house of parliament.

The act that imposed specific stamp and other duties in the British colonies was at the top of the list of complaints. They argued that its main effect was to tax the colonists without their approval and to expand the authority of admiralty courts, ultimately undermining their rights and freedoms. They also sent a petition to the King and a formal request to each house of Parliament.

These papers were drawn with temperate firmness. They express, unequivocally, the attachment of the colonists to the mother country; and assert the rights they claim in the earnest language of conviction.

These documents were written with calm determination. They clearly express the colonists' loyalty to the mother country and firmly state the rights they believe they have in the sincere language of conviction.

Having, in addition to these measures, recommended to the several colonies to appoint special agents, with instructions to unite their utmost endeavours in soliciting a redress of grievances; and directed their clerk to make out a copy of their proceedings for each colony, congress adjourned.[188]

Having also suggested that the various colonies appoint special agents to work together in seeking a remedy for their grievances, and directed their clerk to create a copy of their proceedings for each colony, Congress adjourned.[188]

To interest the people of England against the measures of administration, associations were formed for the encouragement of domestic manufactures, and against the use of those imported from Great Britain. To increase their quantity of wool, the colonists determined to kill no lambs, and to use all the means in their power to multiply their flocks of sheep. To avoid the use of stamps, proceedings in the courts of justice were suspended; and a settlement of all controversies by arbitration was strongly recommended.

To get the people of England concerned about the government's actions, groups were created to promote local manufacturing and discourage the use of products imported from Great Britain. To boost their wool supply, the colonists decided not to kill any lambs and to do everything they could to grow their sheep populations. To steer clear of using stamps, court proceedings were put on hold, and settling disputes through arbitration was highly recommended.

Violence in the large towns.

While this determined and systematic opposition was made by the thinking part of the community, some riotous and disorderly meetings took place, especially in the large towns, which threatened serious consequences. Many houses were destroyed, much property injured, and several persons, highly respectable in character and station, were grossly abused.

While this focused and methodical opposition was organized by the thoughtful members of the community, there were also chaotic and unruly gatherings, particularly in the larger cities, which posed significant risks. Many buildings were damaged, a lot of property was harmed, and several individuals, who were well-respected in their character and position, were severely mistreated.

While these transactions were passing in America, causes entirely unconnected with the affairs of the colonies, produced a total revolution in the British cabinet. The Grenville party was succeeded by an administration unfriendly to the plan for taxing the colonies without their consent. General Conway, one of the principal secretaries of state, addressed a circular letter to the several governors, in which he censured, in mild terms, the violent measures that had been adopted, and recommended to them, while they maintained the dignity of the crown and of parliament, to observe a temperate and conciliatory conduct towards the colonists, and to endeavour, by persuasive means, to restore the public peace.

While these events were happening in America, completely unrelated issues led to a major shift in the British government. The Grenville party was replaced by a leadership that opposed taxing the colonies without their consent. General Conway, one of the key secretaries of state, sent a letter to the various governors, where he gently criticized the harsh actions that had been taken and advised them, while upholding the authority of the crown and parliament, to adopt a more moderate and conciliatory approach towards the colonists and to try, using persuasive methods, to bring back public peace.

1766

Parliament was opened by a speech from the throne, in which his majesty declared his firm confidence in their wisdom and zeal, which would, he doubted not, guide them to such sound and prudent resolutions, as might tend at once to preserve the constitutional rights of the British legislature over the colonies, and to restore to them that harmony and tranquillity which had lately been interrupted by disorders of the most dangerous nature.

Parliament was opened with a speech from the throne, where his majesty expressed his strong confidence in their wisdom and enthusiasm, which he believed would lead them to sensible and careful decisions. These decisions would not only uphold the constitutional rights of the British legislature over the colonies but also bring back the harmony and peace that had recently been disrupted by serious disturbances.

In the course of the debate in the house of commons, on the motion for the address, Mr. Pitt, in explicit terms, condemned the act for collecting stamp duties in America; and avowed the opinion that parliament had no right to tax the colonies. He asserted, at the same time, "the authority of that kingdom to be sovereign and supreme in every circumstance of government and legislation whatever." He maintained the difficult proposition "that taxation is no part of the governing, or legislative power; but that taxes are a voluntary gift and grant of the commons alone;" and concluded an eloquent speech, by recommending to the house, "that the stamp act be repealed, absolutely, totally, and immediately."

During the debate in the House of Commons on the motion for the address, Mr. Pitt clearly condemned the act of collecting stamp duties in America and stated that Parliament had no right to tax the colonies. At the same time, he claimed that "the authority of that kingdom is sovereign and supreme in every aspect of government and legislation." He argued that "taxation is not part of the governing or legislative power; instead, taxes are a voluntary gift and grant of the commons alone." He ended his passionate speech by recommending to the House that "the Stamp Act be repealed, absolutely, totally, and immediately."

The opinions expressed by Mr. Pitt were warmly opposed by the late ministers. Mr. Grenville said, "that the disturbances in America were grown to tumults and riots; he doubted, they bordered on open rebellion; and, if the doctrine he had heard that day should be confirmed, he feared they would lose that name to take that of revolution. The government ever them being dissolved, a revolution would take place in America." He contended that taxation was a part of the sovereign power;—one branch of legislation; and had been exercised over those who were not represented. He could not comprehend the distinction between external and internal taxation; and insisted that the colonies ought to bear a part of the burdens occasioned by a war for their defence.

The views expressed by Mr. Pitt were strongly opposed by the former ministers. Mr. Grenville stated, "the unrest in America has escalated into riots and disorder; I believe they are on the verge of open rebellion, and if the principles I heard today are confirmed, I fear they will lose the label of rebellion and take on that of revolution. With the government there being dissolved, a revolution will occur in America." He argued that taxation is a part of the sovereign power—one aspect of legislation—and has been imposed on those who are not represented. He did not understand the difference between external and internal taxation and insisted that the colonies should share the financial burdens caused by a war for their defense.

Stamp act repealed.

The existing administration, however, concurred in sentiment with Mr. Pitt, and the act was repealed; but its repeal was accompanied with a declaratory act, asserting the right of Great Britain to bind the colonies in all cases whatsoever.

The current administration, however, agreed with Mr. Pitt, and the act was repealed; but its repeal came with a declaratory act, asserting Great Britain's right to govern the colonies in all cases whatsoever.

The intelligence of this event was received in America with general manifestations of joy. The assertion of the abstract principle of right gave many but little concern, because they considered it merely as a salve for the wounded pride of the nation, and believed confidently that no future attempt would be made to reduce it to practice. The highest honours were conferred on those parliamentary leaders who had exerted themselves to obtain a repeal of the act; and, in Virginia, the house of Burgesses voted a statue to his majesty, as an acknowledgment of their high sense of his attention to the rights and petitions of his people.

The news of this event was met in America with widespread joy. The claim of the abstract principle of right didn’t bother many, as they saw it merely as a way to soothe the nation's wounded pride, believing confidently that no future attempts would be made to put it into action. The highest honors were given to the parliamentary leaders who worked hard to get the act repealed; and, in Virginia, the House of Burgesses voted to create a statue for His Majesty, as a way to acknowledge their appreciation for his attention to the rights and requests of his people.

Though all the colonies rejoiced at the repeal of the stamp act, the same temper did not prevail in all of them. In the commercial cities of the north, the regulations of trade were nearly as odious as the stamp act itself. Political parties too had been formed, and had assumed a bitterness in some of the colonies, entirely unknown in others. These dispositions were not long concealed. The first measures of Massachusetts and of New York demonstrated that, in them, the reconciliation with the mother country was not cordial.

Though all the colonies celebrated the repeal of the stamp act, not everyone felt the same way. In the northern commercial cities, trade regulations were almost as unpopular as the stamp act itself. Political parties had also formed and taken on a level of hostility in some colonies that was completely unfamiliar in others. These feelings didn't stay hidden for long. Massachusetts and New York's initial actions made it clear that their relationship with the mother country wasn't friendly.

The letter of secretary Conway, transmitting the repeal of the act imposing a duty on stamps, enclosed also a resolution of parliament declaring that those persons who had suffered injuries in consequence of their assisting to execute that act, ought to be compensated by the colony in which such injuries were sustained. This was chiefly in Massachusetts. The resolution of parliament was laid before the general court of that province, by governor Bernard, in a speech rather in the spirit of the late, than the present administration;—rather calculated to irritate than assuage the angry passions that had been excited. The house of representatives resented his manner of addressing them; and appeared more disposed to inquire into the riots, and to compel those concerned in them to make indemnities, than to compensate the sufferers out of the public purse. But, after a second session, and some intimation that parliament would enforce its requisition, an act of pardon to the offenders, and of indemnity to the sufferers, was passed; but was rejected by the King, because the colonial assembly had no power, by their charter, to pass an act of general pardon, but at the instance of the crown.[189]

The letter from Secretary Conway, which conveyed the repeal of the stamp duty act, also included a resolution from Parliament stating that individuals who were harmed while trying to enforce that act should be compensated by the colony where the injuries occurred. This primarily applied to Massachusetts. Governor Bernard presented the Parliament's resolution to the general court of that province, delivering a speech that felt more like the old administration than the current one; it seemed more aimed at provoking anger than calming the heated emotions that had been stirred up. The House of Representatives was offended by his tone and seemed more inclined to investigate the riots and hold those involved accountable for damages than to use public funds to compensate the victims. However, after a second session and some hints that Parliament would insist on its demands, a law granting pardon to the offenders and compensation to the victims was passed but rejected by the King because the colonial assembly had no authority, according to their charter, to enact a general pardon without the crown's request.[189]

In New York, where general Gage was expected with a considerable body of troops, a message was transmitted by the governor to the legislature, desiring their compliance with an act of parliament called "the mutiny act," which required that the colony in which any of his majesty's forces might be stationed, should provide barracks for them, and necessaries in their quarters. The legislature postponed the consideration of this message until the troops were actually arrived; and then, after a second message from the governor, reluctantly and partially complied with the requisitions of the act.

In New York, where General Gage was expected with a significant number of troops, the governor sent a message to the legislature asking them to comply with a law from Parliament known as "the Mutiny Act." This act required that the colony housing any of His Majesty's forces must provide barracks for them and supplies in their quarters. The legislature delayed discussing this message until the troops actually arrived; then, after receiving a second message from the governor, they reluctantly and partially agreed to the demands of the act.

At a subsequent session, the governor brought the subject again before the assembly, who determined that the act of parliament could be construed only to require that provision should be made for troops on a march, and not while permanently stationed in the country.[190] The reason assigned for not furnishing the accommodations required by the governor, implies the opinion that the act of parliament was rightfully obligatory; and yet the requisitions of the mutiny act were unquestionably a tax; and no essential distinction is perceived between the power of parliament to levy a tax by its own authority, and to levy it through the medium of the colonial legislatures; they having no right to refuse obedience to the act. It is remarkable that such inaccurate ideas should still have prevailed, concerning the controlling power of parliament over the colonies.

At a later meeting, the governor brought up the topic again with the assembly, which decided that the act of parliament could only be understood as requiring provisions for troops on the move, not for those permanently stationed in the country.[190] The reason given for not providing the accommodations the governor requested suggests an acknowledgment that the act of parliament was indeed binding; however, the demands of the mutiny act were clearly a tax. There is no real distinction between parliament's ability to impose a tax on its own and to do so through colonial legislatures, as they had no right to ignore the act. It's noteworthy that such misunderstandings about parliament's authority over the colonies still existed.

In England it was thought to manifest a very forbearing spirit, that this instance of disobedience was punished with no positive penalties; and that the ministers contented themselves with a law prohibiting the legislature of the province from passing any act, until it should comply, in every respect, with the requisitions of parliament. The persevering temper of Massachusetts not having found its way to New York, this measure produced the desired effect.

In England, it was seen as a sign of great patience that this act of disobedience was punished with no specific penalties; instead, the ministers were satisfied with a law that stopped the province's legislature from passing any laws until it fully complied with the demands of Parliament. Since the determined spirit of Massachusetts didn't make its way to New York, this action achieved the intended result.

Two companies of artillery, driven into the port of Boston by stress of weather, applied to the governor for supplies. He laid the application before his council, who advised that, "in pursuance of the act of parliament" the supplies required should be furnished. They were furnished, and the money to procure them was drawn from the treasury by the authority of the executive.

Two artillery companies, forced into the Boston port by bad weather, requested supplies from the governor. He presented the request to his council, which recommended that, "in accordance with the act of parliament," the necessary supplies should be provided. They were provided, and the funds to obtain them were taken from the treasury with the executive's approval.

1767

On the meeting of the legislature, the house of representatives expressed in pointed terms their disapprobation of the conduct of the governor. Particular umbrage was given by the expression "in pursuance of an act of parliament." "After the repeal of the stamp act, they were surprised to find that this act, equally odious and unconstitutional, should remain in force. They lamented the entry of this reason for the advice of council the more, as it was an unwarrantable and unconstitutional step which totally disabled them from testifying the same cheerfulness they had always shown in granting to his majesty, of their free accord, such aids as his service has from time to time required."[191] Copies of these messages were transmitted by governor Bernard to the minister, accompanied by letters not calculated to diminish the unpleasantness of the communication.

During the meeting of the legislature, the House of Representatives clearly expressed their disapproval of the governor's actions. They were particularly upset by the phrase "in pursuance of an act of parliament." "After the repeal of the Stamp Act, they were astonished to find that this equally unpopular and unconstitutional act was still in effect. They regretted that this reasoning was included in the council’s advice, as it was an unjustified and unconstitutional move that completely prevented them from showing the same willingness they've always had in granting support to His Majesty whenever his service required it."[191] Copies of these messages were sent by Governor Bernard to the minister, along with letters that did nothing to ease the unpleasantness of the situation.

The idea of raising revenue in America, was so highly favoured in England, especially by the landed interest, that not even the influence of administration could have obtained a repeal of the stamp act, on the naked principle of right. Few were hardy enough to question the supremacy of parliament; and the act receding from the practical assertion of the power to tax the colonists, deeply wounded the pride of the King, and of the nation.

The idea of generating revenue in America was so strongly supported in England, especially by landowners, that not even the government could get a repeal of the stamp act based on the principle of right. Few were brave enough to challenge the authority of parliament; and the act, which backed down from the practical claim of the power to tax the colonists, seriously hurt the pride of the King and the nation.

The temper discovered in some of the colonies was ill calculated to assuage the wound, which this measure had inflicted, on the haughty spirit of the country; and is supposed to have contributed to the revival of a system, which had been reluctantly abandoned.

The attitude found in some of the colonies was poorly suited to heal the hurt that this action had caused to the proud spirit of the nation; and it's believed to have helped bring back a system that had been reluctantly given up.

Charles Townshend, chancellor of the exchequer, said boastingly in the house of commons, "that he knew how to draw a revenue from the colonies without giving them offence."[192] Mr. Grenville eagerly caught at the declaration, and urged this minister to pledge himself to bring forward the measure, at which he had hinted. During the sickness and absence of lord Chatham, the cabinet had decided on introducing a bill for imposing certain duties on tea, glass, paper, and painter's colours, imported into the colonies from Great Britain; and appropriating the money in the first instance, to the salaries of the officers of government. This bill was brought into parliament, and passed almost without opposition.

Charles Townshend, the chancellor of the exchequer, confidently stated in the House of Commons, "I know how to collect revenue from the colonies without upsetting them." [192] Mr. Grenville eagerly seized on this statement and encouraged the minister to commit to introducing the measure he had alluded to. While Lord Chatham was unwell and absent, the cabinet agreed to introduce a bill to impose certain duties on tea, glass, paper, and painter's colors imported into the colonies from Great Britain; and to allocate the funds initially for government officials' salaries. This bill was presented in parliament and passed nearly without opposition.

The friends of America, in England, had distinguished between internal and external taxation; and the same distinction had been made in the colonies. But the discussions originating in the stamp act, while they diffused among the colonists a knowledge of their political rights, had inspired also more accurate ideas respecting them.

The friends of America in England had made a distinction between internal and external taxation, and the same distinction was recognized in the colonies. However, the debates stemming from the Stamp Act not only spread awareness of political rights among the colonists but also led to a clearer understanding of those rights.

These duties were plainly intended, not to regulate commerce, but to raise revenue, which would be as certainly collected from the colonists, as the duties on stamps could have been. The principle of the two measures was the same. Many of the Americans were too intelligent to be misguided by the distinction between internal and external taxation, or by the precedents quoted in support of the right, for which parliament contended. This measure was considered as establishing a precedent of taxation for the mere purpose of revenue, which might afterwards be extended at the discretion of parliament; and was spoken of as the entering wedge, designed to make way for impositions too heavy to be borne. The appropriation of the money did not lessen the odium of the tax. The colonists considered the dependence of the officers of government, on the colonial legislature, for their salaries, as the best security for their attending to the interests, and cultivating the affections of the provinces.[193] Yet the opinion that this act was unconstitutional, was not adopted so immediately, or so generally, as in the case of the stamp act. Many able political essays appeared in the papers, demonstrating that it violated the principles of the English constitution and of English liberty, before the conviction became general, that the same principle which had before been successfully opposed, was again approaching in a different form.

These duties were clearly meant not to regulate trade but to generate revenue, which could be just as easily collected from the colonists as the stamp duties could have been. The principle behind both measures was the same. Many Americans were too smart to be confused by the difference between internal and external taxes, or by the precedents used to justify the claims made by Parliament. This measure was viewed as setting a precedent for taxation purely for revenue purposes, which could later be expanded at Parliament's discretion; it was referred to as the entering wedge, intended to clear the way for burdens too heavy to bear. The allocation of the money did not lessen the dislike for the tax. The colonists believed that the dependence of government officers on the colonial legislature for their salaries was the best guarantee for them to focus on the interests and win the support of the provinces.[193] However, the belief that this act was unconstitutional did not gain acceptance as quickly or widely as it did with the stamp act. Many well-written political essays appeared in the newspapers, arguing that it violated the principles of the English constitution and English liberty, before the general realization set in that the same principle which had previously been successfully opposed was now resurfacing in a different form.

1768

The general court of Massachusetts, perceiving plainly that the claim to tax America was revived, and being determined to oppose it, addressed an elaborate letter to Dennis de Berdt, agent for the house of representatives, detailing at great length, and with much weight of argument, all the objections to the late acts of parliament. Letters were also addressed to the earl of Shelburne and general Conway, secretaries of state, to the marquis of Rockingham, lord Camden, the earl of Chatham, and the lords commissioners of the treasury. These letters, while they breathe a spirit of ardent attachment to the British constitution, and to the British nation, manifest a perfect conviction that their complaints were just.

The Massachusetts General Court, clearly aware that the issue of taxing America was coming back, decided to fight against it. They sent a detailed letter to Dennis de Berdt, the representative for the House of Representatives, outlining extensively and with strong arguments all the objections to the recent acts of Parliament. They also wrote letters to the Earl of Shelburne and General Conway, secretaries of state, as well as to the Marquis of Rockingham, Lord Camden, the Earl of Chatham, and the Lords Commissioners of the Treasury. These letters, while showing a deep commitment to the British Constitution and to the British nation, clearly express their belief that their grievances were justified.

Conclusive as the arguments they contained might have appeared to Englishmen, if urged by themselves in support of their own rights, they had not much weight, when used to disprove the existence of their authority over others. The deep and solemn tone of conviction, however, conveyed in all these letters, ought to have produced a certainty that the principles assumed in them had made a strong impression, and would not be lightly abandoned. It ought to have been foreseen that with such a people, so determined, the conflict must be stern and hazardous; and, it was well worth the estimate, whether the object would compensate the means used to obtain it.

As strong as their arguments might have seemed to the English, if they were presented by themselves to support their own rights, they didn't carry much weight when used to argue against their authority over others. The deep and serious tone of conviction in all these letters should have created a certainty that the principles laid out in them had made a strong impression and wouldn't be easily given up. It should have been evident that with such a resolved people, the conflict would be tough and risky; and it was important to consider whether the goal would justify the means used to achieve it.

Petition to the King.

The assembly also voted a petition to the King, replete with professions of loyalty and attachment; but stating, in explicit terms, their sense of the acts against which they petitioned.

The assembly also voted on a petition to the King, filled with expressions of loyalty and devotion; but clearly stating their concerns about the actions they were petitioning against.

A proposition was next made for an address to the other colonies on the power claimed by parliament, which, after considerable debate, was carried in the affirmative; and a circular letter to the assemblies of the several provinces, setting forth the proceedings of the house of representatives, was prepared and adopted.[194]

A proposal was then made to address the other colonies regarding the power claimed by parliament, which, after a lot of discussion, was approved; and a circular letter to the assemblies of the various provinces outlining the actions of the house of representatives was created and accepted.[194]

To rescue their measures from the imputation of systematic opposition to the British government, the house, without acknowledging the obligation of the mutiny act, complied with a requisition of the governor to make a farther provision for one of the King's garrisons within the province. The governor, soon afterwards, prorogued the general court with an angry speech, not calculated to diminish the resentments of the house directed against himself; resentments occasioned as much by the haughtiness of his manners, and a persuasion that he had misrepresented their conduct and opinions to ministers, as by the unpopular course his station required him to pursue.[195]

To protect their actions from being seen as systematically opposing the British government, the assembly, without admitting their obligation under the mutiny act, agreed to a request from the governor to provide more support for one of the King's garrisons in the province. Soon after, the governor adjourned the general court with an angry speech that did nothing to ease the assembly's resentment towards him; this resentment was fueled both by his arrogant demeanor and the belief that he had misrepresented their actions and views to the authorities, as well as by the unpopular decisions his position forced him to make.[195]

The circular letter of the house of representatives of Massachusetts was well received in the other colonies. They approved the measures which had been taken, and readily united in them. They, too, petitioned the King against the obnoxious acts of parliament, and instructed their several agents to use all proper means to obtain their repeal. Virginia transmitted a statement of her proceedings[196] to her sister colonies; and her house of Burgesses, in a letter to Massachusetts, communicating the representation made to parliament, say, "that they do not affect an independency of their parent kingdom, the prosperity of which they are bound, to the utmost of their abilities, to promote; but cheerfully acquiesce in the authority of parliament to make laws for the preserving a necessary dependence, and for regulating the trade of the colonies; yet they cannot conceive, and humbly insist, it is not essential to support a proper relation between the mother country, and colonies transplanted from her, that she should have a right to raise money from them without their consent, and presume they do not aspire to more than the right of British subjects, when they assert that no power on earth has a right to impose taxes on the people, or take the smallest portion of their property without their consent given by their representatives in parliament."[197]

The circular letter from the Massachusetts House of Representatives was well received in the other colonies. They approved the actions taken and quickly joined in. They also petitioned the King against the unpopular acts of Parliament and instructed their agents to use all appropriate methods to get them repealed. Virginia sent a report of her activities[196] to her sister colonies; and her House of Burgesses, in a letter to Massachusetts, sharing the representation made to Parliament, stated, "they do not seek independence from their parent kingdom, whose prosperity they are obligated to support to the best of their abilities; but they willingly accept the authority of Parliament to create laws for maintaining a necessary dependence and regulating the trade of the colonies; yet they cannot understand, and humbly argue, that it is not essential to maintain a proper relationship between the mother country and the colonies taken from her, that she should have the right to raise money from them without their consent, and they believe they do not seek anything more than the rights of British subjects when they assert that no power on earth has the right to impose taxes on the people or take even the smallest portion of their property without their consent given through their representatives in Parliament."[197]

On the first intimation of the measures taken by Massachusetts, the earl of Hillsborough, who had been appointed to the newly created office of secretary of state for the department of the colonies, addressed a circular to the several governors, to be laid before the respective assemblies, in which he treated the circular letter of Massachusetts, as being of the most dangerous tendency, calculated to inflame the minds of his majesty's good subjects in the colonies, to promote an unwarrantable combination, to excite an open opposition to the authority of parliament, and to subvert the true principles of the constitution.[198]

As soon as Massachusetts announced its actions, the Earl of Hillsborough, who had just been appointed as the new Secretary of State for the Colonies, sent a letter to the various governors to present to their assemblies. In this letter, he described Massachusetts's circular as extremely dangerous, designed to stir up the emotions of loyal subjects in the colonies, encourage an unjust alliance, provoke open resistance to Parliament's authority, and undermine the basic principles of the constitution.[198]

His first object was to prevail on the several assemblies openly to censure the conduct of Massachusetts; his next, to prevent their approving the proceedings of that colony. The letter, far from producing the desired effect, rather served to strengthen the determination of the colonies to unite in their endeavours to obtain a repeal of laws universally detested. On manifesting this disposition, the assemblies were generally dissolved;—probably in pursuance of instructions from the crown.

His main goal was to persuade the various assemblies to publicly criticize Massachusetts; next, he aimed to stop them from supporting that colony’s actions. Instead of achieving its intended effect, the letter only strengthened the colonies' resolve to come together in their efforts to have laws that were widely hated repealed. When this desire became clear, the assemblies were mostly dissolved—likely following orders from the crown.

When the general court of Massachusetts was again convened, governor Bernard laid before the house of representatives, an extract of a letter from the earl of Hillsborough, in which, after animadverting in harsh terms on the circular letter to the colonies, he declared it to be "the King's pleasure" that the governor "should require the house of representatives, in his majesty's name, to rescind the resolution on which the circular letter was founded, and to declare their disapprobation of, and dissent from, that rash and hasty proceeding."

When the Massachusetts General Court was convened again, Governor Bernard presented to the House of Representatives an excerpt from a letter by the Earl of Hillsborough. In it, he criticized the circular letter to the colonies in strong terms and stated that it was "the King's pleasure" that the governor "should require the House of Representatives, in his Majesty's name, to rescind the resolution that the circular letter was based on, and to declare their disapproval of and dissent from that reckless and hasty action."

This message excited considerable agitation; but the house, without coming to any resolution on it, requested the governor to lay before them the whole letter of the earl of Hillsborough, and also copies of such letters as had been written by his excellency to that nobleman, on the subject to which the message referred.

This message caused a lot of commotion; however, the house, without reaching any decision on it, asked the governor to present the entire letter from the Earl of Hillsborough, as well as copies of the letters that his excellency had sent to that nobleman regarding the topic mentioned in the message.

The copies were haughtily refused; but the residue of the letter from the earl of Hillsborough was laid before them. That minister said, "if, notwithstanding the apprehensions which may justly be entertained of the ill consequence of a continuance of this factious spirit, which seems to have influenced the resolutions of the assembly at the conclusion of the last session, the new assembly should refuse to comply with his majesty's reasonable expectation, it is the King's pleasure that you immediately dissolve them."

The copies were arrogantly rejected; however, the remaining part of the letter from the Earl of Hillsborough was presented to them. The minister stated, "If, despite the valid concerns about the negative effects of this rebellious attitude, which seems to have swayed the assembly's decisions at the end of the last session, the new assembly still refuses to meet His Majesty's reasonable expectations, it is the King's wish that you dissolve them immediately."

This subject being taken into consideration, a letter to the earl was reported, and agreed to by a majority of ninety-three to thirteen, in which they defended their circular letter in strong and manly, but respectful terms; and concluded with saying, "the house humbly rely on the royal clemency, that to petition his majesty will not be deemed by him to be inconsistent with a respect to the British constitution as settled at the revolution by William III., and that to acquaint their fellow subjects involved in the same distress, of their having so done, in full hopes of success, even if they had invited the union of all America in one joint supplication, would not be discountenanced by their gracious sovereign, as a measure of an inflammatory nature. That when your lordship shall in justice lay a true state of these matters before his majesty, he will no longer consider them as tending to create unwarrantable combinations, or excite an unjustifiable opposition to the constitutional authority of parliament; that he will then truly discern who are of that desperate faction which is continually disturbing the public tranquillity; and that, while his arm is extended for the protection of his distressed and injured subjects, he will frown upon all those who, to gratify their own passions, have dared to attempt to deceive him."[199]

Considering this topic, a letter to the earl was drafted and approved by a majority of ninety-three to thirteen. In it, they strongly and respectfully defended their circular letter and concluded by saying, "The House humbly relies on the royal mercy, believing that petitioning His Majesty will not be seen as disrespectful to the British Constitution established at the revolution by William III. Informing their fellow subjects who share in the same struggles about this action, with hopes of success—even if they have called for all of America to unite in a single petition—should not be viewed by our gracious sovereign as an inflammatory move. When your lordship justly presents an accurate account of these issues to His Majesty, he will no longer see them as creating unjustifiable alliances or provoking improper opposition to the constitutional authority of Parliament. He will recognize who belongs to that reckless faction disturbing the public peace; and while His arm is outstretched to protect his distressed and wronged subjects, he will disapprove of those who, to satisfy their own desires, have dared to mislead him."[199]

Legislature of Massachusetts dissolved.

A motion to rescind the resolution on which their circular letter was founded, passed in the negative, by a majority of ninety-two to seventeen; and a letter to the governor was prepared, stating their motives for refusing to comply with the requisition of the earl of Hillsborough. Immediately after receiving it, he prorogued the assembly, with an angry speech; and, the next day, dissolved it by proclamation.[200]

A motion to overturn the resolution that their circular letter was based on failed, with ninety-two votes against and seventeen in favor; a letter was then drafted to the governor explaining their reasons for not complying with the request from the Earl of Hillsborough. As soon as he received it, he suspended the assembly with an angry speech and the next day, he officially dissolved it by proclamation.[200]

While the opposition was thus conducted by the legislature with temperate firmness, and legitimate means, the general irritation occasionally displayed itself at Boston, in acts of violence denoting evidently that the people of that place, were prepared for much stronger measures than their representatives had adopted.

While the opposition was handled by the legislature with calm determination and appropriate methods, the general frustration sometimes showed itself in Boston through acts of violence, clearly indicating that the people there were ready for much stronger actions than their representatives had taken.

Seizure of the sloop Liberty.

The seizure of the sloop Liberty belonging to Mr. Hancock, by the collector of the customs, occasioned the assemblage of a tumultuous mob, who beat the officers and their assistants, took possession of a boat belonging to the collector, burnt it in triumph, and patrolled the streets for a considerable time. The revenue officers fled for refuge, first to the Romney man of war, and afterwards to Castle William. After the lapse of some time, the governor moved the council to take into consideration some measure for restoring vigour and firmness to government. The council replied "that the disorders which happened were occasioned by the violent and unprecedented manner in which the sloop Liberty had been seized by the officers of the customs." And the inhabitants of Boston, in a justificatory memorial, supported by affidavits, insisted that the late tumults were occasioned, principally, by the haughty conduct of the commissioners and their subordinate officers, and by the illegal and offensive conduct of the Romney man of war.[201]

The seizure of the sloop Liberty, owned by Mr. Hancock, by the customs collector led to a wild mob gathering. They attacked the officers and their aides, took over one of the collector's boats, burned it in victory, and patrolled the streets for a long time. The revenue officers sought safety first on the Romney warship and then at Castle William. After a while, the governor urged the council to consider a way to restore strength and authority to the government. The council responded that the chaos was caused by the forceful and unprecedented way the customs officers had taken the sloop Liberty. The people of Boston, in a memorial defending their actions and backed by affidavits, argued that the recent unrest was primarily caused by the arrogant behavior of the commissioners and their assistants, as well as the illegal and aggressive actions of the Romney warship.[201]

The legislature however did not think proper to countenance this act of violence. A committee of both houses, appointed to inquire into the state of the province, made a report which, after reprobating the circumstances attending the seizure, to which the mob was ascribed, declared their abhorrence of a procedure which they pronounced criminal; desired the governor to direct a prosecution against all persons concerned in the riot; and to issue a proclamation offering a reward to any person who should make discoveries by which the rioters or their abettors should be brought to condign punishment.

The legislature, however, did not support this act of violence. A committee from both houses, set up to investigate the situation in the province, submitted a report that condemned the circumstances surrounding the seizure, which was attributed to the mob. They expressed their strong disapproval of a process they deemed criminal, urged the governor to initiate legal action against everyone involved in the riot, and called for a proclamation offering a reward to anyone who could provide information that would lead to the arrest and punishment of the rioters or their accomplices.

This report, however, seems to have been intended, rather to save appearances, than to produce any real effect. It was perfectly understood that no person would dare to inform; or even to appear, as a witness, in any prosecution which might be instituted. Suits were afterwards brought against Mr. Hancock and others, owners of the vessel and cargo; but they were never prosecuted to a final decision.[202]

This report, however, seems to have been meant more to maintain appearances than to create any real impact. It was clear that nobody would risk coming forward to inform or even show up as a witness in any trial that might follow. Lawsuits were later filed against Mr. Hancock and others, who owned the vessel and cargo, but they were never pursued to a final verdict.[202]

This riot accelerated a measure, which tended, in no inconsiderable degree, to irritate still farther the angry dispositions already prevalent in Boston.

This riot sped up a measure that significantly fueled the already tense anger in Boston.

The governor had pressed on administration the necessity of stationing a military force in the province, for the protection of the officers employed in collecting the revenue, and of the magistrates, in preserving the public peace. In consequence of these representations, orders had already been given to general Gage to detach, at least, one regiment on this service, and to select for the command of it, an officer on whose prudence, resolution, and integrity, he could rely. The transactions respecting the sloop Liberty rendered any attempt to produce a countermand of these orders entirely abortive; and, probably occasioned two regiments, instead of one, to be detached by general Gage.[203]

The governor had emphasized to the administration the need to send a military force to the province to protect the officers in charge of collecting taxes and the magistrates responsible for maintaining public order. As a result of these concerns, orders had already been issued to General Gage to assign at least one regiment to this duty and to choose an officer for the command whom he could trust for their judgment, determination, and honesty. The events related to the sloop Liberty made it impossible to cancel these orders, and likely led General Gage to dispatch two regiments instead of just one.[203]

It seems to have been supposed that a dissolution of the assembly of Massachusetts would dissolve also the opposition to the measures of administration; and that the people, having no longer constitutional leaders, being no longer excited and conducted by their representatives, would gradually become quiet, and return to, what was termed, their duty to government. But the opinions expressed by the house of representatives were the opinions of the great body of the people, and had been adopted with too much ardour to be readily suppressed. The most active and energetic part of society had embraced them with enthusiasm; and the dissolution of the assembly, by creating a necessity for devising other expedients, hastened the mode of conducting opposition at least as efficacious, and afterwards universally adopted.

It seems that it was assumed that dissolving the Massachusetts assembly would also dissolve the opposition to the government’s policies; and that the people, no longer having constitutional leaders and not being stirred up and guided by their representatives, would gradually calm down and return to what was called their duty to the government. However, the views expressed by the House of Representatives reflected the opinions of the majority of the people and had been embraced with too much passion to be easily suppressed. The most energetic and active part of society had eagerly adopted them; and the assembly's dissolution created a need to come up with other strategies, which actually sped up the way opposition was conducted, leading to methods that were at least as effective and later widely adopted.

At a town meeting of the inhabitants of Boston, a committee was deputed for the purpose of praying the governor to convene another general assembly. He replied that no other could be convened until his majesty's commands to that effect should be received. This answer being reported, the meeting resolved "that to levy money within that province by any other authority than that of the general court, was a violation of the royal charter, and of the undoubted natural rights of British subjects.

At a town meeting of the residents of Boston, a committee was assigned to ask the governor to call another general assembly. He responded that no other assembly could be called until he received orders from the king. After hearing this response, the meeting decided "that collecting money in that province by any authority other than the general court is a violation of the royal charter and the undeniable natural rights of British subjects."

"That the freeholders, and other inhabitants of the town of Boston would, at the peril of their lives and fortunes, take all legal and constitutional measures to defend all and singular the rights, liberties, privileges, and immunities, granted in their royal charter.

"That the property owners and other residents of the town of Boston would, at the risk of their lives and fortunes, take all legal and constitutional actions to defend all the rights, liberties, privileges, and protections granted in their royal charter."

"That as there was an apprehension in the minds of many of an approaching war with France, those inhabitants who were not provided with arms should be requested duly to observe the laws of the province, which required that every freeholder should furnish himself with a complete stand."

"Because there was a concern among many about an impending war with France, those residents who didn't have weapons should be asked to properly follow the laws of the province, which stated that every landowner needed to equip themselves with a full set of arms."

But the important resolution was "that, as the governor did not think proper to call a general court for the redress of their grievances, the town would then make choice of a suitable number of persons to act for them as a committee in a convention, to be held at Faneuil Hall in Boston, with such as might be sent to join them from the several towns in the province."

But the important decision was "that, since the governor didn't find it appropriate to call a general court to address their grievances, the town would then choose a suitable number of people to represent them as a committee in a convention, to be held at Faneuil Hall in Boston, along with others who might come to join them from the various towns in the province."

These votes were communicated by the select men, in a circular letter to the other towns in the province, which were requested to concur, and to elect committee men, to meet those of Boston in convention.

These votes were shared by the selectmen in a circular letter to the other towns in the province, asking them to agree and to choose committee members to meet with those from Boston in convention.

Convention assembles in Boston.

The measure was generally adopted; and a convention met, which was regarded with all the respect that could have been paid to a legitimate assembly.[204]

The measure was widely accepted, and a convention gathered that was treated with all the respect that could have been given to a legitimate assembly.[204]

Its moderation.

The country in general, though united on the great constitutional question of taxation, was probably not so highly exasperated as the people of Boston; and the convention acted with unexpected moderation. They disclaimed all pretensions to any other character than that of mere individuals, assembled by deputation from the towns, to consult and advise on such measures as might tend to promote the peace of his majesty's subjects in the province, but without power to pass any acts possessing a coercive quality.

The country as a whole, while united on the important constitutional issue of taxation, was likely not as frustrated as the people of Boston; and the convention acted with surprising restraint. They stated clearly that they had no claim to be anything more than individuals gathered from various towns to discuss and advise on ways to promote the peace of the king's subjects in the province, but without the authority to enact any laws that would force compliance.

They petitioned the governor to assemble a general court, and addressed a letter to the agent of the province in England, stating the character in which they met, and the motives which brought them together. After expressing their opinions with temper and firmness on the subjects of general complaint, and recommending patience and order to the people, they dissolved themselves, and returned to their respective homes.[205]

They asked the governor to call a meeting of the general court and sent a letter to the province's representative in England, explaining their purpose and reasons for gathering. After calmly and firmly sharing their views on common concerns and encouraging the people to be patient and orderly, they disbanded and went back to their homes.[205]

Two regiments arrive.

The day before the convention rose, the two regiments which had been detached by general Gage arrived, under convoy, in Nantasket road. The council had rejected an application of the governor to provide quarters for them, because the barracks in the castle were sufficient for their accommodation; and, by act of parliament, the British troops were not to be quartered elsewhere until those barracks were full. General Gage had directed one regiment to be stationed in Boston; but, on hearing a report that the people were in a state of open revolt, he gave additional orders, which left the whole subject to the discretion of the commanding officer; who was induced, by some rash threats of opposing the disembarkation of the troops to land both regiments in that place. The ships took a station which commanded the whole town, and lay with their broad sides towards it, ready to fire, should any resistance be attempted. The troops landed under cover of their cannon, and marched into the common with loaded muskets and fixed bayonets;[206] a display of military pomp, which was believed by the inhabitants to have been intended for the purpose either of intimidation, or of irritation.

The day before the convention started, the two regiments that General Gage had sent arrived, escorted, at Nantasket road. The council had turned down a request from the governor to provide accommodations for them because the barracks in the castle were enough for their needs; according to parliamentary law, British troops couldn't be housed elsewhere until those barracks were full. General Gage had ordered one regiment to be stationed in Boston, but upon hearing that people were openly revolting, he gave further orders that allowed the commanding officer to decide. Some rash threats against landing the troops led to both regiments being disembarked there. The ships positioned themselves to cover the entire town, turned broadside towards it, ready to fire if there was any resistance. The troops landed with the support of their cannons and marched into the common with loaded muskets and fixed bayonets; a show of military force that the locals believed was meant either to intimidate or provoke them.

The select men, as well as the council, having refused to provide quarters for the troops, the governor ordered the state house to be opened for their reception; and they took possession of all the apartments in it, except that which was reserved for the council. The people were filled with indignation at seeing the chamber of their representatives crowded with regular soldiers, their counsellors surrounded with foreign troops, and their whole city exhibiting the appearance of a garrisoned town. With the difference of manners between the soldiers and the inhabitants, and the strong prejudices reciprocally felt against each other, it is not wonderful that personal broils should frequently occur, and that mutual antipathies should be still farther increased.[207]

The selectmen and the council, refusing to provide housing for the troops, led the governor to order the state house to be opened for their accommodation. The troops then took over all the rooms in it, except the one reserved for the council. The people were outraged to see the chamber of their representatives filled with regular soldiers, their counselors surrounded by foreign troops, and their entire city looking like a military base. Given the differences in behavior between the soldiers and the residents, along with the strong biases they held against each other, it's no surprise that personal conflicts happened frequently and that mutual hostility only grew. [207]

While these measures were pursuing in America, every session of parliament was opened with a speech from the King, stating that a disposition to refuse obedience to the laws, and to resist the authority of the supreme legislature of the nation, still prevailed among his misguided subjects in some of the colonies. In the addresses to the throne, both houses uniformly expressed their abhorrence of the rebellious spirit manifested in the colonies, and their approbation of the measures taken by his majesty for the restoration of order and good government.

While these measures were being pursued in America, every session of parliament began with a speech from the King, noting that there was still a tendency among his misguided subjects in some colonies to refuse to obey the laws and resist the authority of the nation's supreme legislature. In the addresses to the throne, both houses consistently expressed their disgust at the rebellious spirit shown in the colonies and their approval of the actions taken by his majesty to restore order and good government.

To give a more solemn expression to the sense of parliament on this subject, the two houses entered into joint resolutions, condemning the measures pursued by the Americans; and agreed to an address, approving the conduct of the crown, giving assurances of effectual support to such farther measures as might be found necessary to maintain the civil magistrates in a due execution of the laws within the province of Massachusetts Bay, and beseeching his majesty to direct the governor of that colony to obtain and transmit information of all treasons committed in Massachusetts since the year 1767, with the names of the persons who had been most active in promoting such offences, that prosecutions might be instituted against them within the realm, in pursuance of the statute of the 35th of Henry VIII.[208]

To give a more serious expression to the view of parliament on this matter, both houses put together joint resolutions, condemning the actions taken by the Americans. They also agreed on an address that supported the crown's actions, promising effective support for any further measures needed to help the civil authorities properly enforce the laws in Massachusetts Bay. Additionally, they urged the king to instruct the governor of that colony to gather and send information about all treasonous acts committed in Massachusetts since 1767, including the names of those most involved in encouraging such offenses, so that prosecutions could be pursued against them in the realm, according to the statute of the 35th of Henry VIII.[208]

1769

The impression made by these threatening declarations, which seem to have been directed particularly against Massachusetts, in the hope of deterring the other provinces from involving themselves in her dangers, was far from being favourable to the views of the mother country. The determination to resist the exercise of the authority claimed by Great Britain not only remained unshaken, but was manifested in a still more decided form.

The impact of these threatening statements, which appeared to be aimed mainly at Massachusetts in the hopes of discouraging other colonies from getting caught up in her troubles, was definitely not supportive of the mother country's goals. The resolve to oppose the authority claimed by Great Britain not only stayed strong but became even more pronounced.

Not long after these votes of parliament, the assembly of Virginia was convened by lord Botetourt, a nobleman of conciliating manners, who had lately been appointed governor of that province. The house took the state of the colony into their immediate consideration, Resolutions of the house of Burgesses of Virginia.and passed unanimously several resolutions asserting the exclusive right of that assembly to impose taxes on the inhabitants within his majesty's dominion of Virginia, and their undoubted right to petition for a redress of grievances, and to obtain a concurrence of the other colonies in such petitions. "That all persons charged with the commission of any offence within that colony, were entitled to a trial before the tribunals of the country, according to the fixed and known course of proceeding therein, and that to seize such persons, and transport them beyond sea for trial, derogated in a high degree from the rights of British subjects, as thereby the inestimable privilege of being tried by a jury from the vicinage, as well as the liberty of summoning and producing witnesses on such trial, will be taken from the party accused."

Not long after these parliamentary votes, the assembly of Virginia was called together by Lord Botetourt, a nobleman known for his friendly demeanor, who had recently been appointed governor of the province. The house immediately took up the situation in the colony, Resolutions of the Virginia House of Burgesses. and unanimously passed several resolutions asserting that only that assembly had the right to impose taxes on the people within His Majesty's dominion of Virginia. They also affirmed their undeniable right to petition for a resolution of grievances and to seek support from the other colonies for such petitions. "All individuals charged with any offense within that colony had the right to a trial by the courts of the country, following the established and known procedures in place, and that to arrest such individuals and transport them overseas for trial significantly undermined the rights of British subjects, as it would strip away the invaluable privilege of being tried by a jury from the local area, as well as the ability to call and present witnesses during that trial."

An address to his majesty was also agreed on, which states in the style of loyalty and real attachment to the crown, the deep conviction of the house of Burgesses of Virginia, that the complaints of the colonists were well founded.[209]

An address to the king was also agreed upon, which expresses, in a tone of loyalty and genuine attachment to the crown, the strong belief of the House of Burgesses of Virginia that the colonists' complaints were justified.[209]

Assembly dissolved.

Intelligence of these proceedings having reached the governor, he suddenly dissolved the assembly. This measure did not produce the desired effect. The members convened at a private house, and, having chosen their speaker, moderator, proceeded to form a non-importing association, which was signed by every person present, and afterwards, almost universally throughout the province.[210]

The governor got wind of these events and abruptly disbanded the assembly. This action didn't have the intended impact. The members gathered at a private home, chose their speaker, and went on to create a non-importing association, which was signed by everyone present and later became nearly universal across the province.[210]

From the commencement of the controversy, the opinion seems to have prevailed in all the colonies, that the most effectual means of succeeding in the struggle in which they were engaged, were those which would interest the merchants and manufacturers of Great Britain in their favour. Under the influence of this opinion, associations had been proposed in Massachusetts, as early as May 1765, for the non-importation of goods from that country. The merchants of some of the trading towns in the other colonies, especially those of Philadelphia, refused, at that time, to concur in a measure which they thought too strong for the existing state of things; and it was laid aside. But, in the beginning of August, it was resumed in Boston; and the merchants of that place entered into an agreement not to import from Great Britain any articles whatever, except a few of the first necessity, between the first of January 1769, and the first of January 1770; and not to import tea, glass, paper, or painter's colours, until the duties imposed on those articles should be taken off. This agreement was soon afterwards adopted in the town of Salem, the city of New York, and the province of Connecticut; but was not generally entered into through the colonies, until the resolutions and address of the two houses of parliament which have already been mentioned, seemed to cut off the hope that petitions and memorials alone, would effect the object for which they contended.[211]

From the start of the conflict, it seemed that everyone in the colonies believed the best way to succeed in their struggle was to get the merchants and manufacturers of Great Britain on their side. Influenced by this belief, associations were suggested in Massachusetts as early as May 1765 to stop importing goods from Britain. At that time, merchants in some trading towns in other colonies, especially Philadelphia, didn’t agree with this strong measure given the current situation, so it was put aside. However, in early August, it was brought back up in Boston, where the merchants agreed not to import any items from Great Britain, except for a few essentials, from January 1, 1769, to January 1, 1770; and to not import tea, glass, paper, or paint until the taxes on those items were removed. Soon after, Salem, New York City, and Connecticut adopted this agreement, but it didn't spread widely throughout the colonies until the resolutions and address by both houses of parliament—previously mentioned—seemed to dash hopes that petitions alone would achieve their goals.[211]

The proceedings of the house of Burgesses of Virginia had been transmitted to the speakers of the several assemblies throughout the continent. Measures against the importation of British goods.In the opinion of the neighbouring colonies, the occasion required efficacious measures; and an association, similar to that which had been formed by their elder sister, was entered into by Maryland, and the Carolinas. The inhabitants of Charleston went so far as to break off all connexion with Rhode Island and Georgia, which had refused to adopt the non-importation agreement. This vigorous measure was not without its influence; and those provinces, soon afterwards, entered into the association.[212]

The proceedings of the Virginia House of Burgesses were shared with the speakers of various assemblies across the continent. Actions taken against the import of British goods. The neighboring colonies believed that the situation called for strong actions, and an agreement, similar to the one created by their older counterpart, was established by Maryland and the Carolinas. The people of Charleston even decided to cut off all ties with Rhode Island and Georgia, which had refused to join the non-importation agreement. This decisive action had an impact, and those provinces soon joined the association.[212]

In Portsmouth in New Hampshire, where governor Wentworth possessed great influence, some repugnance to this measure was also discovered; but, being threatened with a suspension of their intercourse with the other colonies, the merchants of that place concurred in the general system.

In Portsmouth, New Hampshire, where Governor Wentworth had a lot of influence, there was some resistance to this measure; however, after being warned that they might be cut off from communication with the other colonies, the merchants there went along with the overall plan.

All united in giving effect to this agreement. The utmost exertions were used to improve the manufactures of the country; and the fair sex, laying aside the late fashionable ornaments of England, exulted, with patriotic pride, in appearing dressed in the produce of their own looms. Committees chosen by the people superintended importations; and the force of public opinion went far to secure the agreement from violation.

All came together to make this agreement a reality. Great efforts were made to improve the country's manufacturing; and women, setting aside the recent trendy styles from England, proudly wore clothes made from their own local fabrics. Committees elected by the people oversaw imports, and public opinion played a major role in protecting the agreement from being broken.

General court in Massachusetts.

The necessities of government requiring a supply of money, the general court of Massachusetts was again convened. The members of the former house of representatives were generally re-elected, and brought with them the temper which had occasioned their dissolution. Instead of entering on the business for which they were called together, they engaged in a controversy with the governor concerning the removal of the ships of war from the harbour, and of the troops from the town of Boston, to which they contended, his power, as the representative of the crown was adequate.

The government's need for funding led to the Massachusetts General Court being called back into session. Most of the previous House of Representatives members were re-elected, bringing with them the same mindset that had caused their earlier dismissal. Rather than focusing on the tasks at hand, they got into a disagreement with the governor about moving the warships out of the harbor and relocating the troops from Boston, arguing that his authority, as the crown's representative, was sufficient for the job.

The governor, ascribing this temper to the influence of the metropolis, adjourned the general court to Cambridge; but this measure served to increase the existing irritation. The business recommended to them remained unnoticed; their altercations with the governor continued; and they entered into several warm resolutions enlarging the catalogue of their grievances, in terms of greater exasperation than had appeared in the official acts of any legislature on the continent.[213]

The governor, blaming this mood on the influence of the city, moved the general court to Cambridge; however, this only fueled the existing frustration. The issues they discussed went unaddressed; their disputes with the governor carried on; and they created several intense resolutions that added to their list of grievances, expressing anger greater than any seen in official acts from any legislature on the continent.[213]

It is prorogued.

Not long after the passage of these resolutions, the house explicitly refused to make the provision required by the mutiny act for the troops stationed in Massachusetts; upon which, the legislature was prorogued until the first of January.[214]

Not long after these resolutions were passed, the house clearly refused to provide what was required by the mutiny act for the troops stationed in Massachusetts; as a result, the legislature was adjourned until January 1.[214]

The committees, appointed to examine the cargoes of vessels arriving from Great Britain, continued to execute the trust reposed in them. Votes of censure were passed on such as refused to concur in the association, or violated its principles; and the names of the offenders were published, as enemies to their country. In some cases, the goods imported in contravention of it, were locked up in warehouses; and, in some few instances, they were re-shipped to Great Britain.

The committees assigned to inspect the cargoes of ships coming from Great Britain kept carrying out their responsibilities. They passed votes of disapproval against those who refused to join the association or broke its rules, and they published the names of the offenders as enemies of the country. In some cases, the goods imported in violation of the association were stored away in warehouses, and in a few instances, they were sent back to Great Britain.

Not long after the strong resolutions already noticed had been agreed to by parliament, while their effect was unfolding itself in every part of the American continent, an important revolution took place in the British cabinet. The duke of Grafton was placed at the head of a new administration. He supported, with great earnestness, a proposition to repeal the duties imposed for the purpose of raising revenue in the colonies; but his whole influence was insufficient to carry this measure completely. Administration resolved on a partial repeal of duties.It was deemed indispensable to the maintenance of the legislative supremacy of Great Britain, to retain the duty on some one article; and that on tea was reserved while the others were relinquished.

Not long after Parliament agreed to the strong resolutions already mentioned, while their impact was being felt all across the American continent, a significant shake-up happened in the British cabinet. The Duke of Grafton took charge of a new administration. He strongly backed a proposal to remove the taxes meant to generate revenue in the colonies, but his influence wasn’t enough to fully push this measure through. The administration decided to partially repeal the duties. It was considered essential for maintaining Great Britain's legislative authority to keep the tax on at least one item; thus, the tax on tea was maintained while the others were dropped.

Seldom has a wise nation adopted a more ill judged measure than this. The contest with America was plainly a contest of principle, and had been conducted entirely on principle by both parties. The amount of taxes proposed to be raised was too inconsiderable to interest the people of either country. But the principle was, in the opinion of both, of the utmost magnitude. The measure now proposed, while it encouraged the colonists to hope that their cause was gaining strength in Britain, had no tendency to conciliate them.

Seldom has a wise nation made a more poorly thought-out decision than this. The struggle with America was clearly a battle of principles, and both sides had approached it entirely on that basis. The amount of tax that was being proposed was too small to really matter to the people in either country. But the principle behind it was, in the eyes of both, extremely significant. The measure being proposed now, while giving the colonists hope that their cause was gaining traction in Britain, did nothing to win them over.

Circular letter of the earl of Hillsborough.

In pursuance of this resolution of the cabinet, a circular letter was written by the earl of Hillsborough to the several governors, informing them "that it was the intention of his majesty's ministers to propose, in the next session of parliament, taking off the duties on glass, paper, and painter's colours, in consideration of such duties having been laid contrary to the true spirit of commerce; and assuring them that, at no time, had they entertained the design to propose to parliament to lay any further taxes on America for the purpose of raising a revenue."[215]

In line with this cabinet decision, a circular letter was sent by the Earl of Hillsborough to the various governors, informing them "that it was the intention of his majesty's ministers to propose, in the next session of parliament, removing the duties on glass, paper, and painter's colors, considering that these duties had been imposed against the true spirit of commerce; and assuring them that, at no time, did they plan to propose any additional taxes on America for the purpose of raising revenue."[215]

This measure was soon communicated in letters from private individuals in England to their correspondents in Massachusetts. The merchants of Boston, apprehensive that an improper opinion concerning its operation might be formed, resolved that the partial repeal of the duties did not remove the difficulties under which their trade laboured, and was only calculated to relieve the manufacturers of Great Britain; and that they would still adhere to their non-importation agreement.[216]

This decision was quickly shared in letters from private individuals in England to their contacts in Massachusetts. The merchants in Boston, worried that people might misunderstand its impact, decided that the partial repeal of the duties didn't eliminate the challenges facing their trade and was just meant to benefit manufacturers in Great Britain. They also agreed to stick to their non-importation agreement.[216]

The communication of the earl of Hillsborough to the several governors, was laid before the respective assemblies as they convened, in terms implying an intention to renounce the imposition, in future, of any taxes in America. But this communication seems not to have restored perfect content in any of the colonies.

The earl of Hillsborough's message to the various governors was presented to the respective assemblies as they met, suggesting a plan to stop imposing any taxes in America in the future. However, this message doesn’t seem to have fully restored contentment in any of the colonies.

The Virginia legislature was in session on its arrival, and governor Botetourt laid it before them. Their dissatisfaction with it was manifested by a petition to the King re-asserting the rights previously maintained; and by an association, signed by the members as individuals, renewing their non-importation agreement, until the duty on tea should be repealed.[217]

The Virginia legislature was in session when they arrived, and Governor Botetourt presented it to them. Their discontent was clear through a petition to the King reaffirming their previously held rights, as well as an agreement, signed by the members as individuals, to continue their non-importation pact until the tea tax was repealed.[217]

Yet several causes combined to prevent a rigid observance of these associations. The sacrifice of interest made by the merchants could be continued only under the influence of powerful motives. Suspicions were entertained of each other in the same towns; and committees to superintend the conduct of importers were charged with gross partiality. The different towns too watched each other with considerable jealousy; and accusations were reciprocally made of infractions of the association to a great extent. Letters were published purporting to be from England, stating that large orders for goods had been received; and the inconvenience resulting from even a partial interruption of commerce, and from the want of those manufactures which the inhabitants had been accustomed to use, began to be severely and extensively felt. In Rhode Island and Albany, it was determined to import as usual, with the exception of such articles as should be dutiable. On the remonstrances of other commercial places, especially of Boston, these resolutions were changed; and the hope was entertained that the general system on which the colonies relied, would still be maintained.

Yet several factors came together to prevent strict adherence to these associations. The sacrifices made by the merchants could only continue with strong motivations. There were suspicions among people in the same towns, and the committees overseeing importers were accused of blatant favoritism. The different towns also kept a close eye on each other with considerable jealousy, and accusations of violations of the association were often exchanged. Letters were published claiming to be from England, stating that large orders for goods had been received; and the problems resulting from even a partial interruption of trade, along with the lack of goods that the locals were used to, began to be intensely felt. In Rhode Island and Albany, it was decided to import as usual, except for items that would be taxed. After complaints from other commercial areas, especially Boston, these resolutions were changed; and there was hope that the overall system on which the colonies depended would still be upheld.

New York recedes in part from the non-importation agreement.

These hopes were blasted by New York. That city soon manifested a disposition to import as usual, with the exception of those articles only which were subject to a duty. At first, the resolution thus to limit the operation of the non-importation agreement, was made to depend on its being acceded to by Boston and Philadelphia. These towns refused to depart from the association as originally formed, and strenuously urged their brethren of New York to persevere with them in the glorious struggle. This answer was communicated to the people, and their opinion on the question of rescinding, or adhering to, was taken in from their respective wards. This determination excited the most lively chagrin in New England and Philadelphia. Their remonstrances against it were, however, ineffectual; and the example was soon followed throughout the colonies.[218]

These hopes were shattered by New York. That city quickly showed a tendency to import goods as usual, except for those items that were taxed. Initially, the decision to limit the non-importation agreement was contingent on Boston and Philadelphia agreeing to it. These cities refused to stray from the association as it was originally established and strongly urged their fellow New Yorkers to stick with them in the honorable fight. This response was shared with the people, and their views on whether to rescind or maintain the agreement were gathered from their local wards. This decision caused significant disappointment in New England and Philadelphia. However, their protests against it were ineffective; soon, the same approach was adopted throughout the colonies.[218]

The people of New York alleged, in justification of themselves, that the towns of New England had not observed their engagements fairly; and that the merchants of Albany had been in the practice of receiving goods from Quebec. But no sufficient evidence in support of these assertions was ever produced.

The people of New York claimed, in their defense, that the towns of New England hadn't fulfilled their agreements fairly and that the merchants of Albany were known to receive goods from Quebec. However, no solid evidence was ever provided to back up these claims.

1770

About this time a circumstance occurred, which produced the most serious agitation. The two regiments stationed in Boston, to support, as was said, the civil authority, and preserve the peace of the town, were viewed by the inhabitants with very prejudiced eyes. March.Riot in Boston.Frequent quarrels arose between them; and at length, an affray took place in the night, near the gates of the barracks, which brought out captain Preston, the officer of the day, with a part of the main guard, between whom and the townsmen blows ensued; on which some of the soldiers fired, and four of the people were killed.

About this time, a situation arose that caused significant unrest. The two regiments stationed in Boston, supposedly to support the civil authority and maintain order in the town, were seen by residents with great suspicion. March.Boston riot. Frequent fights broke out between them; eventually, a brawl occurred one night near the barracks gates, prompting Captain Preston, the officer on duty, to bring out part of the main guard. This led to a confrontation with the townspeople, resulting in blows being exchanged; some of the soldiers fired their weapons, and four civilians were killed.

The alarm bells were immediately rung, the drums beat to arms, and an immense multitude assembled. Inflamed to madness by the view of the dead bodies, they were with difficulty restrained from rushing on the 29th regiment, which was then drawn up under arms in King street. The exertions of the lieutenant governor, who promised that the laws should be enforced on the perpetrators of the act, and the efforts of several respectable and popular individuals, prevented their proceeding to extremities, and prevailed on them, after the regiment had been marched to the barracks, to disperse without farther mischief. Captain Preston, and the soldiers who had fired, were committed to prison for trial. On the next day, upwards of four thousand citizens of Boston assembled at Faneuil Hall; and, in a message to the lieutenant governor, stated it to be "the unanimous opinion of the meeting, that the inhabitants and soldiers can no longer live together in safety; that nothing can rationally be expected to restore the peace of the town, and prevent farther blood and carnage, but the immediate removal of the troops; and they therefore most fervently prayed his honour that his power and influence might be exerted for their instant removal."

The alarm bells were quickly sounded, drums beat to gather troops, and a huge crowd gathered. Fueled to anger by the sight of the dead bodies, they could barely be held back from charging at the 29th regiment, which was then lined up with weapons in King Street. The lieutenant governor’s efforts, who promised that the law would be enforced against those responsible for the act, along with the influence of several respected and popular figures, stopped them from going too far. After the regiment was marched to the barracks, they were persuaded to disperse without causing more chaos. Captain Preston and the soldiers who fired their weapons were taken to jail for trial. The next day, over four thousand citizens of Boston gathered at Faneuil Hall and sent a message to the lieutenant governor, stating that it was "the unanimous opinion of the meeting that the inhabitants and soldiers can no longer live together in safety; that nothing can logically be expected to restore peace in the town and prevent further bloodshed and violence, except for the immediate removal of the troops; and they therefore earnestly urged his honor to use his power and influence for their prompt removal."

The lieutenant governor expressed his extreme sorrow at the melancholy event which had occurred; and declared that he had taken measures to have the affair inquired into, and justice done. That the military were not under his command, but received their orders from the general at New York, which orders it was not in his power to countermand. That, on the application of the council for the removal of the troops, colonel Dalrymple, their commanding officer, had engaged that the twenty-ninth regiment, which had been concerned in the affair, should be marched to the castle, and there placed in barracks until farther orders should be received from the general; and that the main guard should be removed, and the fourteenth regiment laid under such restraints, that all occasions of future disturbance should be prevented. This answer was voted to be unsatisfactory; and a committee was deputed to wait on the lieutenant governor, and inform him that nothing could content them but an immediate and total removal of the troops.

The lieutenant governor expressed his deep sadness over the tragic event that had happened and stated that he had taken steps to investigate the matter and ensure justice was served. He mentioned that the military was not under his command and received orders from the general in New York, which he couldn't countermand. He explained that, in response to the council's request for the removal of the troops, Colonel Dalrymple, their commanding officer, had promised that the twenty-ninth regiment, which was involved in the incident, would be marched to the castle and put in barracks until further orders came from the general. He also noted that the main guard would be removed and the fourteenth regiment would be placed under restrictions to prevent any future disturbances. This response was deemed unsatisfactory, and a committee was assigned to meet with the lieutenant governor to inform him that nothing short of an immediate and complete removal of the troops would satisfy them.

This vote was laid before the council by Mr. Hutchinson, who had succeeded Mr. Bernard in the government of the province. The council declared themselves unanimously of opinion "that it was absolutely necessary for his Majesty's service, the good order of the town, and the peace of the province, that the troops should be immediately removed out of the town of Boston."

This vote was presented to the council by Mr. Hutchinson, who had taken over from Mr. Bernard in governing the province. The council unanimously agreed that "it is essential for His Majesty's service, the orderly conduct of the town, and the peace of the province that the troops be immediately removed from the town of Boston."

This opinion and advice being communicated to colonel Dalrymple, he gave his honour that measures should be immediately taken for the removal of both regiments. Satisfied with this assurance, the meeting secured the tranquillity of the town by appointing a strong military watch, and immediately dissolved itself.

This opinion and advice were communicated to Colonel Dalrymple, who promised that actions would be taken right away to remove both regiments. Happy with this assurance, the meeting ensured the town's safety by appointing a strong military watch, and then immediately disbanded.

This transaction was very differently related by the different parties. Mr. Gordon, whose history was written when the resentments of the moment had subsided, and who has collected the facts of the case carefully, states it in such a manner as nearly, if not entirely, to exculpate the soldiers. It appears that an attack upon them had been pre-concerted; and that, after being long insulted with the grossest language, they were repeatedly assaulted by the mob with balls of ice and snow, and with sticks, before they were induced to fire. Trial of captain Preston and the soldiers.This representation is strongly supported by the circumstances, that captain Preston, after a long and public trial, was acquitted by a Boston jury; and that six of the eight soldiers who were prosecuted, were acquitted, and the remaining two found guilty of manslaughter only. Mr. Quincy, and Mr. John Adams, two eminent lawyers, and distinguished leaders of the patriotic party, defended the accused, without sustaining any diminution of popularity. Yet this event was very differently understood through the colonies. It was generally believed to be a massacre, equally barbarous and unprovoked; and it increased the detestation in which the soldiers were universally held.

This incident was described very differently by the various parties involved. Mr. Gordon, who wrote about it after the tensions had eased and who carefully gathered the facts, presents the situation in a way that nearly clears the soldiers of blame. It seems there had been a planned attack against them; after enduring long-term insults and harsh language, they were repeatedly targeted by the crowd with ice, snowballs, and sticks before they were pushed to fire. Trial of Captain Preston and the soldiers. This account is strongly backed by the fact that Captain Preston was acquitted by a Boston jury after a lengthy public trial, and of the eight soldiers prosecuted, six were found not guilty, while the other two were only convicted of manslaughter. Mr. Quincy and Mr. John Adams, two prominent lawyers and leaders of the patriotic faction, defended the accused without losing any popularity. However, this event was interpreted very differently across the colonies. It was widely seen as a massacre that was both brutal and unprovoked, further fueling the widespread animosity toward the soldiers.


CHAPTER XIV.

Insurrection in North Carolina.... Dissatisfaction of Massachusetts.... Corresponding committees.... Governor Hutchinson's correspondence communicated by Dr. Franklin.... The assembly petition for his removal.... He is succeeded by general Gage.... Measures to enforce the act concerning duties.... Ferment in America.... The tea thrown into the sea at Boston.... Measures of Parliament.... General enthusiasm in America.... A general congress proposed.... General Gage arrives.... Troops stationed on Boston neck.... New counsellors and judges.... Obliged to resign.... Boston neck fortified.... Military stores seized by general Gage.... Preparations for defence.... King's speech.... Proceedings of Parliament.... Battle of Lexington.... Massachusetts raises men.... Meeting of Congress.... Proceedings of that body.... Transactions in Virginia.... Provincial congress of South Carolina.... Battle of Breed's hill.

Rebellion in North Carolina.... Discontent in Massachusetts.... Corresponding committees.... Governor Hutchinson's correspondence shared by Dr. Franklin.... The assembly requests his removal.... He is replaced by General Gage.... Actions to enforce the tax law.... Unrest in America.... The tea dumped into the harbor in Boston.... Parliamentary actions.... Widespread enthusiasm in America.... A general congress is suggested.... General Gage arrives.... Troops stationed at Boston Neck.... New advisors and judges.... Forced to resign.... Boston Neck fortified.... Military supplies taken by General Gage.... Preparations for defense.... The King's speech.... Parliamentary proceedings.... Battle of Lexington.... Massachusetts mobilizes troops.... Congress convenes.... Actions of that body.... Events in Virginia.... Provincial congress of South Carolina.... Battle of Bunker Hill.

 

1770

In the middle and southern colonies, the irritation against the mother country appears to have gradually subsided and no disposition was manifested to extend opposition farther than to the importation of tea. Insurrection in North Carolina.Their attention was a good deal directed to an insurrection in North Carolina, where a number of ignorant people, supposing themselves to be aggrieved by the fee bill, rose in arms for the purpose of shutting up the courts of justice, destroying all officers of government, and all lawyers, and of prostrating government itself. Governor Tryon marched against them, defeated them in a decisive battle, quelled the insurrection, and restored order.

In the middle and southern colonies, frustrations with the mother country seemed to have eased, and there was little desire to oppose anything beyond the importation of tea. Rebellion in North Carolina. Their focus was largely on an uprising in North Carolina, where a group of uninformed individuals, believing they had been wronged by the fee bill, took up arms to close down the courts, eliminate all government officials and lawyers, and overthrow the government itself. Governor Tryon led a march against them, defeated them in a decisive battle, quelled the uprising, and restored order.

Dissatisfaction of Massachusetts.

In Massachusetts, where the doctrine that parliament could not rightfully legislate for the colonies was maintained as a corollary from the proposition that parliament could not tax them, a gloomy discontent was manifested. That the spirit of opposition seemed to be expiring, without securing the rights they claimed, excited apprehensions of a much more serious nature in the bosoms of that inflexible people, than the prospect of any conflict, however terrible. This temper displayed itself in all their proceedings.

In Massachusetts, where the belief that parliament had no legitimate authority to make laws for the colonies stemmed from the idea that parliament couldn’t impose taxes on them, a deep sense of discontent was apparent. The fact that the spirit of resistance appeared to be fading without achieving the rights they insisted upon caused greater concern among that steadfast population than the possibility of any conflict, no matter how daunting. This mindset was evident in all their actions.

The legislature, which the governor continued to convene at Cambridge, remonstrated against this removal as an intolerable grievance; and, for two sessions, refused to proceed on business. In one of their remonstrances, they asserted the right of the people to appeal to heaven in disputes between them and persons in power, when power shall be abused.

The legislature, which the governor kept meeting in Cambridge, protested this removal as an unacceptable grievance; and for two sessions, they refused to conduct any business. In one of their protests, they claimed the people's right to appeal to a higher power in disputes with those in authority when that authority is misused.

Corresponding committees.

From the commencement of the contest, Massachusetts had been peculiarly solicitous to unite all the colonies in one system of measures. In pursuance of this favourite idea, a committee of correspondence was elected by the general court, to communicate with such committees as might be appointed by other legislatures.[219] Similar committees were soon afterwards chosen by the towns[220] throughout the province, for the purpose of corresponding with each other; and the example was soon followed by other colonies.

From the start of the conflict, Massachusetts was particularly eager to bring all the colonies together under a single plan of action. To pursue this goal, a committee of correspondence was chosen by the general court to communicate with similar committees that might be established by other legislatures.[219] Soon after, towns[220] across the province also formed similar committees to keep in touch with one another, and other colonies quickly followed suit.

1772

While this system of vigilance was in progress, a discovery was made which greatly increased the ill temper of New England. Doctor Franklin, the agent of Massachusetts, by some unknown means, Governor Hutchinson's correspondence.obtained possession of the letters which had been addressed by governor Hutchinson, and by lieutenant governor Oliver, to the department of state. He transmitted these letters to the general court. They were obviously designed to induce government to persevere in the system which was alienating the affections of the colonists. The opposition was represented as being confined to a few factious men, whose conduct was not generally approved, and who had been emboldened by the weakness of the means used to restrain them. More vigorous measures were recommended; and several specific propositions were made, which were peculiarly offensive. Among these was a plan for altering the charters of the colonies, and rendering the high officers dependent solely on the crown for their salaries.[221]

While this system of surveillance was happening, a discovery was made that significantly increased the anger in New England. Doctor Franklin, the Massachusetts agent, by some unknown means, Governor Hutchinson's letters.obtained the letters addressed by Governor Hutchinson and Lieutenant Governor Oliver to the Department of State. He sent these letters to the general court. They clearly aimed to encourage the government to continue the policies that were driving a wedge between the colonists and themselves. The opposition was portrayed as being limited to a few troublemakers, whose actions weren’t widely supported and who had been bolstered by the ineffective methods used to control them. More forceful actions were suggested, and several specific proposals were made that were especially offensive. One of these was a plan to change the colonies' charters and make the high officials completely dependent on the crown for their pay.[221]

1773
Petition for the removal of the governor and lieutenant governor.

The assembly, inflamed by these letters, unanimously resolved, "that their tendency and design were to overthrow the constitution of the government, and to introduce arbitrary power into the province." At the same time, a petition to the King was voted, praying him to remove governor Hutchinson and lieutenant governor Oliver, for ever, from the government of the colony. This petition was transmitted to Doctor Franklin, and laid before the King in council. After hearing it, the lords of the council reported "that the petition in question was founded upon false and erroneous allegations, and that the same is groundless, vexatious, and scandalous, and calculated only for the seditious purposes of keeping up a spirit of clamour and discontent in the provinces." This report, his majesty was pleased to approve.

The assembly, fired up by these letters, unanimously decided, "that their intention and plan were to upend the constitution of the government and to bring arbitrary power into the province." At the same time, they voted on a petition to the King, asking him to permanently remove Governor Hutchinson and Lieutenant Governor Oliver from the colony's government. This petition was sent to Doctor Franklin and presented to the King in council. After reviewing it, the council lords reported "that the petition in question was based on false and incorrect claims, and that it is unfounded, annoying, and scandalous, aimed only at stirring up unrest and dissatisfaction in the provinces." The King was pleased to approve this report.

Hutchinson succeeded by Gage.

Governor Hutchinson however was soon afterwards removed, and general Gage appointed to succeed him.

Governor Hutchinson was soon removed, and General Gage was appointed to take his place.

The fears of Massachusetts, that the spirit which had been roused in the colonies might gradually subside, were not of long continuance. The determination not to import tea from England, had so lessened the demand for that article, that a considerable quantity had accumulated in the magazines of the East India company. They urged the minister to take off the import American duty of three pence per pound, and offered, in lieu of it, to pay double that sum on exportation. Measures to enforce the duties.1774Instead of acceding to this proposition, drawbacks were allowed on tea exported to the colonies; and the export duty on that article was taken off. These encouragements induced the company to make shipments on their own account; and large quantities were consigned to agents in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Charleston, and other principal places on the continent.[222]

The worries in Massachusetts that the excitement sparked in the colonies might fade away didn’t last long. The decision not to import tea from England had significantly reduced the demand for it, leaving a large stockpile in the warehouses of the East India Company. They urged the government to eliminate the American import duty of three pence per pound and offered to pay double that amount on export. Measures to enforce responsibilities.1774 Instead of agreeing to this proposal, the government allowed drawbacks on tea exported to the colonies and removed the export duty on that product. These incentives encouraged the company to ship tea for their own profit, and significant amounts were sent to agents in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Charleston, and other major cities on the continent.[222]

The crisis was arrived; and the conduct of the colonies was now to determine whether they would submit to be taxed by parliament, or meet the consequences of a practical assertion of the opinions they had maintained. The tea, if landed, would be sold; the duties would, consequently, be paid; and the precedent for taxing them established. The same sentiment on this subject appears to have pervaded the whole continent at the same time. This ministerial plan of importation was considered by all, as a direct attack on the liberties of the people of America, which it was the duty of all to oppose. Ferment in America.A violent ferment was excited in all the colonies; the corresponding committees were extremely active; and it was almost universally declared that whoever should, directly or indirectly, countenance this dangerous invasion of their rights, was an enemy to his country. The consignees were, generally, compelled to relinquish their consignments; and, in most instances, the ships bringing the tea were obliged to return with it.

The crisis had arrived, and the actions of the colonies would now decide whether they would accept being taxed by Parliament or face the consequences of standing by their beliefs. If the tea were unloaded, it would be sold, the duties would be paid, and the precedent for taxing them would be set. This sentiment seemed to resonate across the entire continent simultaneously. Everyone viewed this ministerial plan for importation as a direct assault on the liberties of the American people, which it was everyone's responsibility to resist. Fermentation in America.A strong unrest surged through all the colonies; the corresponding committees were highly active, and it was nearly universally declared that anyone who supported this dangerous infringement on their rights, whether directly or indirectly, was an enemy of their country. The consignees were largely forced to give up their consignments, and in most cases, the ships bringing the tea had to turn back with it.

At Boston, a town meeting appointed a committee to wait on the consignees to request their resignation. This request not being complied with, another large meeting[223] assembled at Faneuil Hall, who voted, with acclamation, "that the tea shall not be landed, that no duty shall be paid, and that it shall be sent back in the same bottoms." With a foreboding of the probable consequences of the measure about to be adopted, and a wish that those consequences should be seriously contemplated, a leading member[224] thus addressed the meeting:

At a town meeting in Boston, a committee was chosen to approach the consignees and ask for their resignation. When they didn’t comply, another large meeting[223] took place at Faneuil Hall, where the attendees voted enthusiastically, "the tea will not be unloaded, no duty will be paid, and it will be sent back on the same ships." Acknowledging the likely consequences of the decision being made and hoping those consequences would be carefully considered, a prominent member[224] addressed the meeting:

"It is not, Mr. Moderator, the spirit that vapours within these walls that must stand us in stead. The exertions of this day will call forth events which will make a very different spirit necessary for our salvation. Whoever supposes that shouts and hosannahs will terminate the trials of the day, entertains a childish fancy. We must be grossly ignorant of the importance and value of the prize for which we contend; we must be equally ignorant of the power of those who have combined against us; we must be blind to that malice, inveteracy, and insatiable revenge, which actuate our enemies, public and private, abroad and in our bosoms, to hope that we shall end this controversy without the sharpest, sharpest conflicts;—to flatter ourselves that popular resolves, popular harangues, popular acclamations, and popular vapour, will vanquish our foes. Let us consider the issue. Let us look to the end. Let us weigh and consider, before we advance to those measures, which must bring on the most trying and terrible struggle this country ever saw."[225]

"It’s not, Mr. Moderator, the atmosphere inside these walls that will save us. The efforts we make today will bring about events that require a very different attitude for our survival. Anyone who thinks that cheers and celebrations will end the challenges we face has a naive outlook. We must be seriously unaware of the significance and value of the prize we are fighting for; we must also be completely ignorant of the strength of those who have united against us; we must be oblivious to the hatred, stubbornness, and endless desire for revenge that drive our enemies, both public and private, around the world and within our own ranks, if we believe we can resolve this conflict without the toughest of battles. Let’s think about the outcome. Let’s focus on the goal. Let’s evaluate and reflect before we proceed with actions that will lead to the most challenging and horrifying struggle this country has ever faced." [225]

The question was again put, and passed unanimously in the affirmative. The captain of the vessel, aware of the approaching danger, was desirous of returning, and applied to the governor for a clearance. Affecting a rigid regard to the letter of his duty, he declined giving one, unless the vessel should be properly qualified at the custom house. This answer being reported, the meeting was declared to be dissolved; and an immense crowd repaired to the quay, Tea thrown into the sea.where a number of the most resolute, disguised as Mohawk Indians, boarded the vessel, broke open three hundred and forty-two chests of tea, and discharged their contents into the ocean.[226]

The question was brought up again and passed unanimously in favor. The captain of the ship, aware of the looming danger, wanted to head back and asked the governor for permission to leave. Sticking closely to the letter of his duties, he refused to grant it unless the ship was properly cleared at the customs house. Once this answer was reported, the meeting was declared over; and a huge crowd gathered at the dock, Tea tossed into the ocean.where several of the most determined individuals, dressed as Mohawk Indians, boarded the ship, broke open three hundred and forty-two chests of tea, and dumped their contents into the ocean.[226]

Measures of parliament.

These proceedings were laid before parliament in a message from the crown, and excited a high and general indignation against the colonies. Both houses expressed, almost unanimously, their approbation of the measures adopted by his Majesty; and gave explicit assurances that they would exert every means in their power, to provide effectually for the due execution of the laws, and to secure the dependence of the colonies upon the crown and parliament of Great Britain. The temper both of the parliament and of the nation was entirely favourable to the high-handed system of coercion proposed by ministers; and that temper was not permitted to pass away unemployed. A bill was brought in "for discontinuing the lading and shipping of goods, wares, and merchandises, at Boston or the harbour thereof, and for the removal of the custom-house with its dependencies to the town of Salem." This bill was to continue in force, not only until compensation should be made to the East India company for the damage sustained, but until the King in council should declare himself satisfied as to the restoration of peace and good order in Boston. It passed both houses without a division, and almost without opposition.[227]

These proceedings were presented to Parliament in a message from the crown, sparking widespread outrage against the colonies. Both houses almost unanimously showed their approval of the actions taken by His Majesty and made clear promises to use every means at their disposal to ensure that the laws were properly enforced and to maintain the colonies' dependence on the crown and Parliament of Great Britain. The attitude of both Parliament and the nation strongly supported the aggressive approach to enforcement proposed by the ministers, and they made sure this sentiment was not wasted. A bill was introduced "to halt the loading and shipping of goods, wares, and merchandise at Boston or its harbor, and to relocate the customs house and its functions to the town of Salem." This bill was set to remain in effect not just until compensation was paid to the East India Company for the losses incurred but until the King in council declared himself satisfied with the restoration of peace and order in Boston. It passed both houses without any divisions and almost without opposition.[227]

 

Boston Tea Party

Boston Tea Party

The Boston Tea Party

The Boston Tea Party

From the painting by Robert Reid, in the Massachusetts State House

From the painting by Robert Reid, in the Massachusetts State House

In this picture, a leading modern American artist has succeeded admirably in depicting the band of Boston citizens who, disguised as Indians, boarded three British ships in Boston Harbor, December 16, 1773, and threw their cargoes of tea overboard, in defying England to impose on the American colonies a tax on tea for the benefit of the straitened East India Company; 342 chests, valued at about £18,000 were destroyed in this manner, without a sound from a great mob of onlookers thronging the wharves. The mob dispersed quietly as soon as the last chest went overboard.

In this artwork, a prominent modern American artist has brilliantly captured the group of Boston residents who, dressed as Native Americans, boarded three British ships in Boston Harbor on December 16, 1773, and dumped their cargo of tea into the water, challenging England's attempt to impose a tax on tea for the struggling East India Company. A total of 342 chests, worth about £18,000, were destroyed in this act, all while a large crowd of spectators watched silently from the docks. The crowd dispersed quietly as soon as the last chest was thrown overboard.

 

Soon afterwards, a bill was brought in "for better regulating the government of the province of Massachusetts Bay." This act entirely subverted the charter, and vested in the crown the appointment of the counsellors, magistrates, and other officers of the colony, who were to hold their offices during the royal pleasure. This bill also was carried through both houses by great majorities; but not without a vigorous opposition, and an animated debate.[228]

Soon after, a bill was introduced "to improve the governance of the province of Massachusetts Bay." This act completely overturned the charter and transferred the power to appoint counselors, magistrates, and other officials of the colony to the crown, who would hold their positions at the royal pleasure. This bill also passed through both houses by large majorities, but not without strong opposition and a lively debate.[228]

The next measure proposed was a bill "for the impartial administration of justice in the province of Massachusetts Bay. It provided that in case any person should be indicted, in that province, for murder or any other capital offence, and it should appear by information given on oath to the governor, that the fact was committed in the exercise or aid of magistracy in suppressing riots, and that a fair trial could not be had in the province, he should send the person so indicted to any other colony, or to Great Britain to be tried." This act was to continue in force for four years.[229]

The next proposal was a bill "for the fair administration of justice in the province of Massachusetts Bay." It stated that if someone was indicted in that province for murder or any other serious crime, and it was shown through sworn information to the governor that the act occurred while trying to prevent riots, and a fair trial couldn't be held in the province, the governor should send the indicted person to another colony or to Great Britain for trial." This law was set to remain in effect for four years.[229]

A bill was also passed for quartering soldiers on the inhabitants; and the system was completed, by "an act making more effectual provision for the government of the province of Quebec." This bill extended the boundaries of that province so as to comprehend the territory between the lakes, the Ohio, and the Mississippi; and established a legislative council to be appointed by the crown, for its government.[230]

A law was also enacted for housing soldiers with the local population; and the system was finalized by "an act providing more effective governance for the province of Quebec." This law expanded the province's borders to include the land between the Great Lakes, the Ohio River, and the Mississippi River; and it set up a legislative council to be appointed by the crown for its administration.[230]

Amidst these hostile measures, one single conciliatory proposition was made. Mr. Rose Fuller moved that the house resolve itself into a committee to take into consideration the duty on the importation of tea into America, with a view to its repeal. This motion was seconded by Mr. Burke, and supported with all the power of reasoning, and all the splendour of eloquence which distinguished that consummate statesman; but reason and eloquence were of no avail. It was lost by a great majority. The earl of Chatham, who had long been too ill to attend parliament, again made his appearance in the house of lords. He could have been drawn out, only by a strong sense of the fatal importance of those measures into which the nation was hurrying. But his efforts were unavailing. Neither his weight of character, his sound judgment, nor his manly eloquence, could arrest the hand of fate which seemed to propel this lofty nation, with irresistible force, to measures which terminated in its dismemberment.[231]

Amidst these hostile actions, only one conciliatory proposal was made. Mr. Rose Fuller suggested that the house meet as a committee to discuss the import duty on tea coming into America, aiming for its repeal. This motion was supported by Mr. Burke, who argued with strong reasoning and impressive eloquence typical of that remarkable statesman; however, reason and eloquence were ineffective. The motion was defeated by a large majority. The Earl of Chatham, who had been too ill to attend parliament for some time, made his return to the House of Lords. His appearance was prompted solely by a deep understanding of the serious importance of the measures the nation was rushing towards. Yet, his efforts were futile. Neither his prominent character, sound judgment, nor powerful oratory could change the course of destiny, which seemed to push this great nation with unstoppable force toward actions that ultimately led to its fragmentation.[231]

It was expected, and this expectation was encouraged by Mr. Hutchinson, that, by directing these measures particularly against Boston, not only the union of the colonies would be broken, but Massachusetts herself would be divided. Never was expectation more completely disappointed. All perceived that Boston was to be punished for having resisted, only with more violence, the principle which they had all resisted; and that the object of the punishment was to coerce obedience to a principle they were still determined to resist. They felt therefore that the cause of Boston was the cause of all, that their destinies were indissolubly connected with those of that devoted town, and that they must submit to be taxed by a parliament, in which they were not and could not be represented, or support their brethren who were selected to sustain the first shock of a power which, if successful there, would overwhelm them all. The neighbouring towns, disdaining to avail themselves of the calamities inflicted on a sister for her exertions in the common cause, clung to her with increased affection; General enthusiasm.and that spirit of enthusiastic patriotism, which, for a time, elevates the mind above all considerations of individual acquisition, became the ruling passion in the American bosom.

It was anticipated, and this expectation was encouraged by Mr. Hutchinson, that by targeting these measures specifically at Boston, not only would the unity of the colonies be shattered, but Massachusetts itself would be divided. Never was an expectation more completely foiled. Everyone understood that Boston was being punished for resisting, only with more violence, the principle they had all opposed; and that the purpose of this punishment was to force compliance with a principle they were still determined to reject. They felt that Boston's struggle was their own, that their fates were tightly linked to that of the dedicated town, and that they must either accept taxation from a parliament in which they were neither represented nor could be, or support their fellow colonists who were chosen to face the initial blow of a power that, if successful there, would crush them all. The neighboring towns, refusing to take advantage of the suffering inflicted on a sister city for her efforts in the common cause, embraced her with even greater loyalty; Overall excitement. and that spirit of passionate patriotism, which for a time lifts the mind above all considerations of personal gain, became the dominant feeling in the hearts of Americans.

On receiving intelligence of the Boston port bill, a meeting of the people of that town was called. They perceived that "the sharpest, sharpest conflict" was indeed approaching, but were not dismayed by its terrors. Far from seeking to shelter themselves from the threatening storm by submission, they grew more determined as it increased.

On hearing about the Boston port bill, a meeting of the people in that town was organized. They realized that "the sharpest, sharpest conflict" was coming, but they weren't scared by it. Instead of trying to protect themselves from the looming storm by giving in, they became more resolute as it intensified.

Resolutions were passed, expressing their opinion of the impolicy, injustice, inhumanity, and cruelty of the act, from which they appealed to God, and to the world; and also inviting the other colonies to join with them in an agreement to stop all imports and exports to and from Great Britain, Ireland, and the West Indies, until the act should be repealed.[232]

Resolutions were adopted, stating their views on the unwise, unjust, inhumane, and cruel nature of the act, to which they appealed to God and to the world; they also invited the other colonies to join them in a commitment to halt all imports and exports to and from Great Britain, Ireland, and the West Indies, until the act was repealed.[232]

It was not in Boston only that this spirit was roused. Addresses were received from every part of the continent, expressing sentiments of sympathy in their afflictions, exhorting them to resolution and perseverance, and assuring them that they were considered as suffering in the common cause.

It wasn't just in Boston that this spirit was awakened. Messages came from all over the continent, expressing sympathy for their struggles, encouraging them to stay strong and persistent, and assuring them that their suffering was recognized as part of a shared cause.

The legislature of Virginia was in session when intelligence of the Boston port bill reached that province. The house of Burgesses set apart the first of June, the day on which the bill was to go into operation, for fasting, prayer, and humiliation, to implore the divine interposition to avert the heavy calamity which threatened the destruction of their civil rights, the evils of a civil war; and to give one heart and one mind to the people, firmly to oppose every invasion of their liberties. Similar resolutions were adopted in almost every province; and the first of June became, throughout the colonies, a day of fasting, humiliation, and prayer, in the course of which sermons were preached to the people, well calculated to inspire them with horror, against the authors of the unjust sufferings of their fellow subjects in Boston.

The Virginia legislature was in session when news of the Boston port bill reached the province. The House of Burgesses designated June 1st, the day the bill was set to take effect, for fasting, prayer, and reflection, asking for divine intervention to prevent the serious troubles that threatened their civil rights and the dangers of a civil war; and to unify the people in their resolve to firmly oppose any infringement on their freedoms. Similar resolutions were passed in almost every province, making June 1st a day of fasting, reflection, and prayer across the colonies, during which sermons were delivered to encourage people to feel outrage against those responsible for the unjust suffering of their fellow citizens in Boston.

This measure occasioned the dissolution of the assembly. The members, before separation, entered into an association, in which they declared that an attack on one colony to compel submission to arbitrary taxes, is an attack on all British America, and threatens ruin to the rights of all, unless the united wisdom of the whole be applied in prevention. A general congress proposed.They, therefore, recommended to the committee of correspondence, to communicate with the several committees of the other provinces, on the expediency of appointing deputies from the different colonies, to meet annually in congress, and to deliberate on the common interests of America. This measure had already been proposed in town meetings, both in New York and Boston.

This action led to the disbanding of the assembly. Before they parted ways, the members formed a united group where they stated that an attack on one colony to force compliance with unfair taxes is an attack on all of British America and threatens the rights of everyone, unless the collective wisdom of all is used to prevent it. A general assembly proposed. They then suggested to the committee of correspondence that they reach out to the various committees in other provinces about the idea of appointing representatives from different colonies to meet annually in congress to discuss the common interests of America. This idea had already been brought up in town meetings in both New York and Boston.

General Gage arrives in Boston.

While the people of Boston were engaged in the first consultations respecting the bill directed particularly against themselves, general Gage arrived in town. He was received, notwithstanding the deep gloom of the moment, with those external marks of respect which had been usual, and which were supposed to belong to his station.

While the people of Boston were having initial discussions about the bill aimed specifically at them, General Gage arrived in town. He was welcomed, despite the serious atmosphere, with the usual outward signs of respect that were expected of his position.

The general court convened by the governor at Salem, passed resolutions, declaring the expediency of a meeting of committees from the several colonies; and appointed five gentlemen as a committee on the part of Massachusetts. The colonies from New Hampshire to South Carolina inclusive, adopted this measure; and, where the legislatures were not in session, elections were made by the people. The legislature of Massachusetts also passed declaratory resolutions expressing their opinion on the state of public affairs, and recommending to the inhabitants of that province to renounce, totally, the consumption of East India teas, and to discontinue the use of all goods imported from the East Indies and Great Britain, until the grievances of America should be completely redressed.

The general court called by the governor in Salem passed resolutions that suggested it was necessary for committees from the various colonies to meet. They appointed five individuals to represent Massachusetts. All the colonies from New Hampshire to South Carolina agreed to this plan, and where the legislatures weren't in session, the people held elections. The Massachusetts legislature also passed resolutions stating their views on the current public issues and urged the residents of the province to completely stop consuming East India teas and to stop using any goods imported from the East Indies and Great Britain until America's grievances were fully addressed.

The governor, having obtained intelligence of the manner in which the house was employed, sent his secretary with directions to dissolve the assembly. Finding the doors shut, and being refused admittance, he read the order of dissolution aloud on the staircase. The next day, the governor received an address from the principal inhabitants of Salem, at that time the metropolis of the province, which marks the deep impression made by a sense of common danger. No longer considering themselves as the inhabitants of Salem, but as Americans, and spurning advantages to be derived to themselves from the distress inflicted on a sister town, for its zeal in a cause common to all, they expressed their deep affliction for the calamities of Boston.

The governor, having learned how the house was being used, sent his secretary with instructions to dissolve the assembly. When they found the doors locked and were denied entry, he read the dissolution order aloud on the staircase. The next day, the governor received a letter from the key residents of Salem, which was then the capital of the province, reflecting the strong feeling of shared threat. No longer seeing themselves just as the residents of Salem, but as Americans, and rejecting any benefits they could gain from the suffering happening to a sister city for its commitment to a common cause, they expressed their profound sorrow for the troubles in Boston.

About this time rough drafts of the two remaining bills relative to the province of Massachusetts, as well as of that for quartering troops in America, were received in Boston, and circulated through the continent. They served to confirm the wavering, to render the moderate indignant, and to inflame the violent.

At this time, rough drafts of the two remaining bills regarding the province of Massachusetts, along with the one about quartering troops in America, were received in Boston and spread throughout the continent. They helped solidify the uncertain, made the moderates angry, and stirred up the extremists.

An agreement was framed by the committee of correspondence in Boston, entitled "a solemn league and covenant," whereby the subscribers bound themselves, "in the presence of God," to suspend all commercial intercourse with Great Britain, from the last day of the ensuing month of August, until the Boston port bill, and the other late obnoxious laws should be repealed. They also bound themselves, in the same manner, not to consume, or purchase from any other, any goods whatever which should arrive after the specified time; and to break off all dealings with the purchasers as well as with the importers of such goods. They renounced, also, all intercourse and connexion with those who should refuse to subscribe to that covenant, or to bind themselves by some similar agreement; and annexed to the renunciation of intercourse, the dangerous penalty of publishing to the world, the names of all who refused to give this evidence of attachment to the rights of their country.

An agreement was created by the correspondence committee in Boston, called "a solemn league and covenant," in which the signatories committed themselves, "in the presence of God," to stop all trade with Great Britain starting from the last day of the upcoming August, until the Boston port bill and other recent objectionable laws were repealed. They also agreed, in the same way, not to consume or buy from anyone any goods that arrived after the specified date; and to cut off all dealings with both the buyers and the importers of those goods. They also rejected any connection with those who refused to sign this covenant or to commit to a similar agreement, and included the serious penalty of publicly naming all who declined to demonstrate their loyalty to their country's rights.

General Gage issued a proclamation in which he termed this covenant "an unlawful, hostile, and traitorous combination, contrary to the allegiance due to the King, destructive of the legal authority of parliament, and of the peace, good order, and safety of the community." All persons were warned against incurring the pains and penalties due to such dangerous offences; and all magistrates were charged to apprehend and secure for trial such as should be guilty of them. But the time when the proclamation of governors could command attention had passed away; and the penalties in the power of the committee of correspondence were much more dreaded than those which could be inflicted by the civil magistrate.[233]

General Gage issued a proclamation where he referred to this agreement as "an unlawful, hostile, and treasonous alliance, against the loyalty owed to the King, undermining the legal authority of parliament, and threatening the peace, order, and safety of the community." Everyone was warned against facing the consequences of such serious offenses, and all magistrates were instructed to arrest and bring to trial anyone found guilty of them. However, the era when governors' proclamations could demand attention had ended; the penalties enforced by the committee of correspondence were feared far more than those that could be imposed by the civil magistrate.[233]

Resolutions were passed in every colony in which legislatures were convened, or delegates assembled in convention, manifesting different degrees of resentment, but concurring in the same great principles. All declared that the cause of Boston was the cause of British America; that the late acts respecting that devoted town were tyrannical and unconstitutional; that the opposition to this ministerial system of oppression ought to be universally and perseveringly maintained; that all intercourse with the parent state ought to be suspended, and domestic manufactures encouraged; and that a general congress should be formed for the purpose of uniting and guiding the councils, and directing the efforts, of North America.

Resolutions were passed in every colony where legislatures met or delegates gathered in convention, showing varying levels of anger but agreeing on the same fundamental principles. Everyone declared that Boston's struggle was the struggle of all British America; that the recent actions against that city were oppressive and unconstitutional; that resistance to this government system of oppression should be consistently and widely upheld; that all trade with Britain should be stopped and local manufacturing supported; and that a general congress should be established to unite and guide the decisions and efforts of North America.

The committees of correspondence selected Philadelphia for the place, and the beginning of September as the time, for the meeting of this important council.

The committees of correspondence chose Philadelphia as the location and early September as the time for the meeting of this important council.

Congress assembles.

On the fourth of September, the delegates from eleven[234] provinces appeared at the place appointed; and, the next day, they assembled at Carpenter's Hall, when Peyton Randolph, late speaker of the house of Burgesses of Virginia, was unanimously chosen president. The respective credentials of the members were then read and approved; and this august assembly, having determined that each colony should have only one vote; that their deliberations should be conducted with closed doors; and that their proceedings, except such as they might determine to publish, should be kept inviolably secret; entered on the solemn and important duties assigned to them.[235]

On September 4th, the delegates from eleven[234] provinces gathered at the designated location; and, the following day, they met at Carpenter's Hall, where Peyton Randolph, the former speaker of the Virginia House of Burgesses, was unanimously elected as president. The credentials of each member were then read and accepted; this distinguished assembly decided that each colony would have just one vote, that their discussions would be held behind closed doors, and that their proceedings, except for any they chose to make public, would be kept completely confidential; they began the serious and significant responsibilities assigned to them.[235]

Committees were appointed to state the rights claimed by the colonies, which had been infringed by acts of parliament passed since the year 1763; to prepare a petition to the King, and addresses to the people of Great Britain, to the inhabitants of the province of Quebec, and to the twelve colonies represented in congress.

Committees were formed to outline the rights claimed by the colonies that had been violated by acts of Parliament passed since 1763; to draft a petition to the King, and to compose addresses to the people of Great Britain, the residents of the province of Quebec, and the twelve colonies represented in Congress.

Certain resolutions[236] of the county of Suffolk in Massachusetts, having been taken into consideration, it was unanimously resolved "that this assembly deeply feels the suffering of their countrymen in Massachusetts Bay, under the operation of the late unjust, cruel, and oppressive acts of the British parliament; that they most thoroughly approve the wisdom and fortitude with which opposition to these wicked ministerial measures has hitherto been conducted; and they earnestly recommend to their brethren, a perseverance in the same firm and temperate conduct, as expressed in the resolutions determined upon, at a meeting of the delegates for the county of Suffolk, on Tuesday the sixth instant; trusting that the effect of the united efforts of North America in their behalf, will carry such conviction to the British nation of the unwise, unjust, and ruinous policy of the present administration, as quickly to introduce better men, and wiser measures."

Certain resolutions[236] of Suffolk County in Massachusetts were considered, and it was unanimously resolved that "this assembly strongly feels for the suffering of their fellow citizens in Massachusetts Bay, caused by the recent unjust, cruel, and oppressive acts of the British Parliament; that they fully support the wisdom and bravery with which resistance to these harmful government measures has been carried out so far; and they strongly encourage their peers to continue with the same steadfast and level-headed approach, as stated in the resolutions agreed upon at a meeting of the Suffolk County delegates on Tuesday, the sixth of this month; trusting that the combined efforts of North America on their behalf will convince the British nation of the unwise, unjust, and destructive policies of the current administration, leading to the swift introduction of better leaders and wiser policies."

It was resolved, unanimously, "that contributions from all the colonies, for supplying the necessities, and alleviating the distresses of our brethren in Boston, ought to be continued, in such manner, and so long, as their occasions may require."

It was decided, unanimously, "that contributions from all the colonies, to supply the necessities and ease the struggles of our fellow citizens in Boston, should continue, in such a way and for as long as their needs may require."

The merchants of the several colonies were requested not to send to Great Britain any orders for goods, and to direct the execution of those already sent to be suspended, until the sense of congress on the means to be taken for preserving the liberties of America, be made public. In a few days, resolutions were passed, suspending the importation of goods from Great Britain, or Ireland, or any of their dependencies, and of their manufactures from any place whatever, after the first day of the succeeding December; and against the purchase or use of such goods. It was also determined that all exports to Great Britain, Ireland, and the West Indies, should cease on the 10th of September, 1775 less American grievances should be redressed before that time. An association, corresponding with these resolutions, was then framed, and signed by every member present. Never were laws more faithfully observed, than were these resolutions of congress; and their association was, of consequence, universally adopted.

The merchants of the various colonies were asked not to place any orders for goods from Great Britain and to hold off on executing any existing orders until Congress publicly shares its thoughts on how to protect America’s liberties. Within a few days, resolutions were passed to stop the importation of goods from Great Britain, Ireland, or any of their territories, as well as their products from anywhere after the first day of the following December, and against buying or using such goods. It was also decided that all exports to Great Britain, Ireland, and the West Indies would stop on September 10, 1775, unless American grievances were addressed by that time. An association that aligned with these resolutions was then established and signed by every member present. Never have laws been followed more faithfully than the resolutions of Congress; as a result, their association was widely embraced.

Early in the session, a declaration[237] of rights was made in the shape of resolutions. This paper merits particular attention, because it states precisely the ground then taken by America. It is observable that it asserted rights which were not generally maintained, at the commencement of the contest; but the exclusive right of legislation in the colonial assemblies, with the exception of acts of the British parliament bona fide made to regulate external commerce, was not averred unanimously.

Early in the session, a declaration[237] of rights was made in the form of resolutions. This document deserves special attention because it clearly outlines the position that America took at the time. Notably, it claimed rights that were not widely accepted at the start of the conflict; however, the exclusive right for colonial assemblies to legislate, except for genuine acts of the British parliament aimed at regulating external trade, was not universally agreed upon.

The addresses prepared, the various papers drawn up, and the measures recommended by this congress, form the best eulogy of the members who composed it. Affection to the mother country, an exalted admiration of her national character, unwillingness to separate from her, a knowledge of the hazards and difficulties of the approaching contest, mingled with enthusiastic patriotism, and a conviction that all which can make life valuable was at stake, characterise their proceedings.

The addresses prepared, the various papers drawn up, and the measures recommended by this congress form the best tribute to the members who made it up. Their deep love for the mother country, great admiration for her national character, reluctance to separate from her, awareness of the risks and challenges of the upcoming struggle, mixed with passionate patriotism, and belief that everything that makes life worthwhile was at stake, define their actions.

Address to the people of Great Britain.

"When," they say in the address to the people to the people of Great Britain, "a nation led to greatness by the hand of liberty, and possessed of all the glory that heroism, munificence, and humanity, can bestow, descends to the ungrateful task of forging chains for her friends and children, and, instead of giving support to freedom turns advocate for slavery and oppression, there is reason to suspect she has either ceased to be virtuous, or been extremely negligent in the appointment of her rulers.

"When," they say in the address to the people of Great Britain, "a nation inspired by liberty and blessed with all the glory that courage, generosity, and compassion can offer, sinks to the ungrateful act of creating chains for her friends and children, and instead of supporting freedom becomes a proponent of slavery and oppression, there’s a reason to question whether she has lost her virtue or has been very careless in choosing her leaders."

"In almost every age, in repeated conflicts, in long and bloody wars, as well civil as foreign, against many and powerful nations, against the open assaults of enemies, and the more dangerous treachery of friends, have the inhabitants of your island, your great and glorious ancestors, maintained their independence, and transmitted the rights of men and the blessings of liberty to you their posterity.

"In almost every era, through ongoing struggles and lengthy, bloody wars, both civil and foreign, against many strong nations, facing direct attacks from enemies and the even more perilous betrayal of friends, the people of your island, your great and glorious ancestors, have upheld their independence and passed on the rights of humanity and the blessings of liberty to you, their descendants."

"Be not surprised therefore that we, who are descended from the same common ancestors, that we, whose forefathers participated in all the rights, the liberties, and the constitution, you so justly boast of, and who have carefully conveyed the same fair inheritance to us, guaranteed by the plighted faith of government, and the most solemn compacts with British sovereigns, should refuse to surrender them to men, who found their claims on no principles of reason, and who prosecute them with a design, that by having our lives and property in their power, they may with the greater facility enslave you."

"Don't be surprised, then, that we, who come from the same common ancestors, who share in the rights, freedoms, and constitution you rightly take pride in, and who have been given this fair inheritance guaranteed by the promised faith of government and the most serious agreements with British rulers, should refuse to give them up to those who base their claims on no reasonable principles, and who pursue them with the intention of using our lives and property as a means to more easily enslave you."

After stating the serious condition of American affairs, and the oppressions, and misrepresentations of their conduct, which had induced the address; and their claim to be as free as their fellow subjects in Britain; they say, "are not the proprietors of the soil of Great Britain lords of their own property? Can it be taken from them without their consent? Will they yield it to the arbitrary disposal of any men, or number of men whatever? You know they will not.

After outlining the serious state of American affairs, along with the oppressions and misrepresentations of their actions that led to this address, and their demand to be as free as their fellow subjects in Britain, they ask, "Are the landowners in Great Britain not the lords of their own property? Can it be taken from them without their agreement? Will they hand it over to the arbitrary control of any person or group of people? You know they won’t.

"Why then are the proprietors of the soil of America less lords of their property than you are of yours, or why should they submit it to the disposal of your parliament, or any other parliament or council in the world, not of their election? Can the intervention of the sea that divides us cause disparity of rights, or can any reason be given why English subjects, who live three thousand miles from the royal palace, should enjoy less liberty than those who are three hundred miles distant from it?

"Why are the landowners in America less in control of their property than you are of yours? Why should they have to hand it over to your parliament or any other parliament or council in the world that they didn't choose? Can the ocean that separates us really create a difference in rights, or is there any reason why English subjects living three thousand miles from the royal palace should have less freedom than those just three hundred miles away?"

"Reason looks with indignation on such distinctions, and freemen can never perceive their propriety."

"Reason looks with anger at such distinctions, and free people can never understand their correctness."

After expatiating on the resources which the conquest of America would place in the hands of the crown for the subjugation of Britain, the address proceeds, "we believe there is yet much virtue, much justice, and much public spirit in the English nation. To that justice we now appeal. You have been told that we are seditious, impatient of government, and desirous of independency. Be assured that these are not facts but calumnies. Permit us to be as free as yourselves, and we shall ever esteem a union with you to be our greatest glory, and our greatest happiness;—we shall ever be ready to contribute all in our power to the welfare of the empire;—we shall consider your enemies as our enemies, and your interest as our own.

After discussing the resources that conquering America would give the crown to control Britain, the address continues, "We believe there is still a lot of virtue, justice, and public spirit in the English nation. To that justice we now appeal. You've been told that we are rebellious, intolerant of government, and eager for independence. Rest assured, these are not truths but lies. Allow us to be as free as you are, and we will always view a union with you as our greatest honor and greatest happiness;—we will always be ready to contribute everything we can to the welfare of the empire;—we will see your enemies as our enemies and your interests as our own."

"But if you are determined that your ministers shall wantonly sport with the rights of mankind:—if neither the voice of justice, the dictates of the law, the principles of the constitution, nor the suggestions of humanity, can restrain your hands from shedding human blood in such an impious cause, we must then tell you that we will never submit to be hewers of wood or drawers of water for any ministry or nation in the world.

"But if you're set on allowing your ministers to recklessly trample on people's rights:—if neither the call for justice, the rules of the law, the foundations of the constitution, nor the principles of humanity can stop you from spilling innocent blood for such a wicked cause, we need to say that we will never agree to be laborers or servants for any government or nation in the world."

"Place us in the same situation that we were at the close of the late war, and our former harmony will be restored."[238]

"Put us back in the same situation we were in at the end of the recent war, and our previous harmony will return."[238]

Petition to the King.

The petition to the King states succinctly the grievances complained of, and then proceeds to say:

The petition to the King clearly lists the complaints and then goes on to say:

"Had our creator been pleased to give us existence in a land of slavery, the sense of our condition might have been mitigated by ignorance and habit. But thanks be to his adorable goodness, we were born the heirs of freedom, and ever enjoyed our right under the auspices of your royal ancestors, whose family was seated on the British throne, to rescue and secure a pious and gallant nation from the popery and despotism of a superstitious and inexorable tyrant. Your majesty, we are confident, justly rejoices that your title to the crown is thus founded on the title of your people to liberty; and, therefore, we doubt not but your royal wisdom must approve the sensibility that teaches your subjects anxiously to guard the blessing they received from divine providence, and thereby to prove the performance of that compact, which elevated the illustrious house of Brunswick to the imperial dignity it now possesses.

"Had our creator chosen to bring us into a world of slavery, our awareness of our condition might have been eased by ignorance and routine. But thanks to his amazing goodness, we were born into freedom, and we have always enjoyed our rights under the rule of your royal ancestors, who were seated on the British throne, to rescue and protect a devoted and brave nation from the tyranny and oppression of a superstitious and relentless tyrant. Your majesty, we are sure you take rightful pride in the fact that your claim to the crown is built on your people's right to liberty; therefore, we believe your royal wisdom supports the understanding that teaches your subjects to eagerly protect the blessing they received from divine providence, thus proving the fulfillment of that agreement that raised the distinguished house of Brunswick to the great position it holds today."

"The apprehensions of being degraded into a state of servitude, from the pre-eminent rank of English freemen, while our minds retain the strongest love of liberty, and clearly foresee the miseries preparing for us and for our posterity, excites emotions in our breasts, which, though we cannot describe, we should not wish to conceal. Feeling as men, and thinking as subjects, in the manner we do, silence would be disloyalty. By giving this faithful information, we do all in our power to promote the great objects of your royal cares—the tranquillity of your government, and the welfare of your people.

"The fear of being reduced to a state of servitude, after having enjoyed the high status of English freemen, while we still have a deep love for liberty and can clearly see the hardships that await us and our children, stirs feelings within us that we can’t fully express, but we don’t want to hide. As men who feel and as subjects who think as we do, staying silent would be a betrayal. By sharing this honest information, we are doing everything we can to support the important goals of your royal concern—the peace of your government and the well-being of your people."

"Duty to your majesty and regard for the preservation of ourselves and our posterity,—the primary obligations of nature and society, command us to entreat your royal attention; and, as your majesty enjoys the signal distinction of reigning over freemen, we apprehend the language of freemen cannot be displeasing. Your royal indignation, we hope, will rather fall on those designing and dangerous men, who, daringly interposing themselves between your royal person and your faithful subjects, and for several years past incessantly employed to dissolve the bonds of society, by abusing your majesty's authority, misrepresenting your American subjects, and prosecuting the most desperate and irritating projects of oppression, have at length compelled us, by the force of accumulated injuries, too severe to be any longer tolerable, to disturb your majesty's repose by our complaints.

"Duty to your majesty and concern for our own safety and that of future generations—the fundamental responsibilities of nature and society—urge us to seek your royal attention. Since your majesty has the great honor of ruling over free people, we believe the voice of the free cannot be unwelcome. We hope your royal displeasure will be directed instead at those scheming and dangerous individuals who have boldly placed themselves between you and your loyal subjects. For years, they have worked tirelessly to undermine the fabric of society by misusing your majesty's authority, misrepresenting your American subjects, and pushing the most extreme and aggravating oppressive measures. As a result of the many grievances we’ve suffered, which have become too unbearable to ignore, we feel compelled to disturb your majesty’s peace with our complaints."

"These sentiments are extorted from hearts that much more willingly would bleed in your majesty's service. Yet so greatly have we been misrepresented, that a necessity has been alleged of taking our property from us without our consent, to defray the charge of the administration of justice, the support of civil government, and the defence, protection, and security of the colonies."

"These feelings come from hearts that would much rather sacrifice for your majesty's cause. Yet we have been so misrepresented that it's been claimed we need to have our property taken from us without our consent to cover the costs of administering justice, supporting civil government, and defending, protecting, and securing the colonies."

After assuring his majesty of the untruth of these allegations, they say, "yielding to no British subjects in affectionate attachment to your majesty's person, family, and government, we too dearly prize the privilege of expressing that attachment, by those proofs that are honourable to the prince that receives them, and to the people who give them, ever to resign it to any body of men upon earth.

After assuring his majesty that these allegations are false, they say, "Like all British subjects, we have a deep loyalty to your majesty, your family, and your government. We value the privilege of expressing that loyalty through gestures that bring honor to both the prince who receives them and the people who give them, and we would never give that up to any group of men on earth."

"We ask but for peace, liberty, and safety. We wish not a diminution of the prerogative, nor do we solicit the grant of any new right in our favour. Your royal authority over us, and our connection with Great Britain, we shall always carefully and zealously endeavour to support and maintain."

"We only ask for peace, freedom, and safety. We don't want to lose any of your powers, nor are we asking for any new rights for ourselves. We will always work hard to support and maintain your royal authority over us and our connection with Great Britain."

After re-stating in a very affecting manner the most essential grievances of which they complain, and professing that their future conduct, if their apprehensions should be removed, would prove them worthy of the regard they had been accustomed, in their happier days to enjoy, they add:

After expressing in a very touching way the main complaints they have, and claiming that their future behavior, if their fears were alleviated, would show that they are deserving of the respect they used to have in their happier days, they add:

"Permit us then most gracious sovereign, in the name of all your faithful people in America, with the utmost humility to implore you, for the honour of Almighty God, whose pure religion our enemies are undermining; for your glory which can be advanced only by rendering your subjects happy, and keeping them united; for the interest of your family, depending on an adherence to the principles that enthroned it; for the safety and welfare of your kingdom and dominions, threatened with almost unavoidable dangers and distresses; that your majesty, as the loving father of your whole people, connected by the same bonds of law, loyalty, faith, and blood, though dwelling in various countries, will not suffer the transcendent relation formed by these ties, to be farther violated, in uncertain expectation of effects that, if attained, never can compensate for the calamities, through which they must be gained."[239]

"Allow us, most gracious sovereign, on behalf of all your loyal people in America, to humbly ask you, for the honor of Almighty God, whose pure religion our enemies are trying to undermine; for your glory, which can only be enhanced by making your subjects happy and keeping them united; for the welfare of your family, which depends on sticking to the principles that support it; for the safety and well-being of your kingdom and territories, facing nearly unavoidable dangers and hardships; that your majesty, as the caring father of your entire people, tied together by the same bonds of law, loyalty, faith, and blood, even though living in different countries, will not allow the significant relationship formed by these ties to be further violated, in the uncertain hope of results that, if achieved, can never make up for the suffering required to obtain them."[239]

Address to the American people.

The address to their constituents is replete with serious and temperate argument. In this paper, the several causes which had led to the existing state of things, were detailed more at large; and much labour was used to convince their judgments that their liberties must be destroyed, and the security of their property and persons annihilated, by submission to the pretensions of Great Britain. The first object of congress being to unite the people of America, by demonstrating the sincerity with which their leaders had sought for reconciliation on terms compatible with liberty, great earnestness was used in proving that the conduct of the colonists had been uniformly moderate and blameless. After declaring their confidence in the efficacy of the mode of commercial resistance which had been recommended, the address concludes with saying, "your own salvation, and that of your posterity, now depends upon yourselves. You have already shown that you entertain a proper sense of the blessings you are striving to retain. Against the temporary inconveniences you may suffer from a stoppage of trade, you will weigh in the opposite balance, the endless miseries you and your descendants must endure, from an established arbitrary power. You will not forget the honour of your country, that must, from your behaviour, take its title in the estimation of the world to glory or to shame; and you will, with the deepest attention, reflect, that if the peaceable mode of opposition recommended by us, be broken and rendered ineffectual, as your cruel and haughty ministerial enemies, from a contemptuous opinion of your firmness, insolently predict will be the case, you must inevitably be reduced to choose, either a more dangerous contest, or a final, ruinous, and infamous submission.

The address to their constituents is filled with serious and rational arguments. In this document, the various reasons that led to the current situation were explained in detail, and a lot of effort was made to convince them that their freedoms would be destroyed and the safety of their property and lives lost if they submitted to Great Britain's claims. The main goal of Congress was to unite the people of America by showing how sincerely their leaders had sought reconciliation on terms that respected liberty. Great effort was put into proving that the colonists' actions had been consistently moderate and just. After expressing confidence in the effectiveness of the proposed commercial resistance, the address ends by stating, "Your own survival, and that of your future generations, now depends on you. You have already shown that you understand the importance of the freedoms you are fighting to keep. When weighing the temporary hardships of trade stoppages, consider the endless sufferings you and your descendants will endure from an imposed arbitrary power. Do not forget the honor of your country, which, due to your actions, will either gain glory or face shame in the eyes of the world; and remember, if the peaceful opposition we recommend is broken and rendered useless—as your cruel and arrogant ministerial enemies arrogantly predict—you will inevitably have to choose between a more dangerous fight or a final, disastrous, and disgraceful submission.

"Motives thus cogent, arising from the emergency of your unhappy condition, must excite your utmost diligence and zeal, to give all possible strength and energy to the pacific measures calculated for your relief. But we think ourselves bound in duty to observe to you, that the schemes agitated against the colonies have been so conducted, as to render it prudent that you should extend your views to mournful events, and be in all respects prepared for every contingency. Above all things, we earnestly entreat you, with devotion of spirit, penitence of heart, and amendment of life, to humble yourselves, and implore the favour of Almighty God; and we fervently beseech his divine goodness to take you into his gracious protection."[240]

"Given the compelling reasons stemming from your unfortunate situation, you must put in your best effort and enthusiasm to support the peaceful actions aimed at your relief. However, we feel it is our duty to point out that the plans against the colonies have been carried out in such a way that it would be wise for you to prepare for sad outcomes and be ready for any situation. Above all, we sincerely urge you, with a spirit of devotion, a repentant heart, and a commitment to change your ways, to humble yourselves and ask for the favor of Almighty God; and we fervently pray that his divine goodness takes you into his gracious protection."[240]

The letter to the people of Canada required no inconsiderable degree of address. The extent of that province was not so alarming to its inhabitants as to their neighbours; and it was not easy to persuade the French settlers, who were far the most numerous, that the establishment of their religion, and the partial toleration of their ancient jurisprudence, were acts of oppression which ought to be resisted. This delicate subject was managed with considerable dexterity, and the prejudices of the Canadians were assailed with some success.

The letter to the people of Canada took quite a bit of skill to craft. The size of the province didn't seem as intimidating to its residents as it did to their neighbors; and it wasn't easy to convince the French settlers, who were by far the majority, that the establishment of their religion and the limited acceptance of their traditional laws were forms of oppression that needed to be fought against. This sensitive topic was handled quite skillfully, and the biases of the Canadians were challenged with some success.

Letters were also addressed to the colonies of St. Johns, Nova Scotia, Georgia, and the Floridas, inviting them to unite with their brethren in a cause common to all British America.[241]

Letters were also sent to the colonies of St. Johns, Nova Scotia, Georgia, and the Floridas, inviting them to join their fellow colonists in a shared cause that was important to all of British America.[241]

After completing the business before them, and recommending that another Congress should be held at the same place on the tenth of the succeeding May, the House dissolved itself.

After finishing their work and suggesting that another Congress be held at the same location on May 10th of the following year, the House adjourned.

October.

The proceedings of Congress were read throughout America, with enthusiastic admiration. Their recommendations were revered as revelations, and obeyed as laws of the strongest obligation. Absolute unanimity could not be expected to exist; but seldom has a whole people been more united; and never did a more sincere and perfect conviction of the justice of a cause animate the human bosom, than was felt by the great body of the Americans. The people, generally, made great exertions to arm and discipline themselves. Independent companies of gentlemen were formed in all the colonies; and the whole face of the country exhibited the aspect of approaching war. Yet the measures of Congress demonstrate that, although resistance by force was contemplated as a possible event, the hope was fondly cherished that the non-importation of British goods would induce a repeal of the late odious acts. It is impossible to account for the non-importation agreement itself. Had war been considered as inevitable, every principle of sound policy required that imports should be encouraged, and the largest possible stock of supplies for an army be obtained.

The actions of Congress were discussed all across America with enthusiastic admiration. Their recommendations were seen as revelations and followed like the strongest laws. While total agreement was unrealistic, few moments in history have seen the population so united, and never has such a sincere belief in the justice of a cause inspired people more than the American populace at that time. Generally, people made significant efforts to arm and train themselves. Independent groups of gentlemen formed in all the colonies, and the entire country showed signs of impending war. However, the steps taken by Congress indicate that, while they considered the possibility of armed resistance, they still held out hope that stopping the import of British goods would persuade them to repeal the recent despised acts. It's hard to explain the non-importation agreement itself. If war had truly been seen as inevitable, all sound reasoning would suggest encouraging imports and gathering the largest stock of supplies possible for an army.

New counsellors and judges.

With the laws relative to the province, governor Gage received a list of thirty-two new counsellors, a sufficient number of whom, to carry on the business of the government, accepted the office, and entered on its duties.

With the laws pertaining to the province, Governor Gage received a list of thirty-two new counselors, a sufficient number of whom accepted the position to manage the government's work and began their duties.

All those who accepted offices under the new system, were denounced as enemies to their country. The new judges were unable to proceed in the administration of justice. When the court houses were opened, the people crowded into them in such numbers that the judges could not obtain admittance; and, on being ordered by the officers to make way for the court, they answered that they knew no court, independent of the ancient laws and usages of their country, and to no other would they submit.[242] Obliged to resign.The houses of the new counsellors were surrounded by great bodies of people, whose threats announced to them that they must resign their offices, or be exposed to the fury of an enraged populace. The first part of the alternative was generally embraced.

All those who took on roles in the new system were called enemies of their country. The new judges couldn’t carry out justice. When the courthouses opened, people flooded in so many that the judges couldn’t get inside; and when ordered by officers to clear a path for the court, they replied that they recognized no court apart from the old laws and customs of their country, and to no other would they comply.[242] Forced to resign. The homes of the new counselors were surrounded by large groups of people, whose threats made it clear that they had to step down from their positions or face the wrath of an angry mob. Most chose to resign.

Boston neck fortified.

In this irritable state of the public mind, and critical situation of public affairs, it was to be expected that every day would furnish new matter of discontent and jealousy. General Gage deemed it a necessary measure of security, to fortify Boston neck; and this circumstance induced the inhabitants to contemplate seriously an evacuation of the town, and removal into the country. Congress was consulted on this proposition; but was deterred from recommending it, by the difficulties attending the measure. It was however referred to the provincial congress, with the declaration that, if the removal should be deemed necessary, the expense attending it ought to be borne by all the colonies.

In this tense atmosphere and critical situation of public affairs, it was expected that each day would bring new reasons for discontent and jealousy. General Gage felt it was necessary to strengthen Boston Neck for security, which led the residents to seriously consider leaving the town and moving to the countryside. Congress was consulted about this idea but decided against recommending it due to the challenges involved. However, it was sent to the provincial congress with the statement that if evacuation became necessary, the costs should be covered by all the colonies.

Military stores seized by general Gage.

The fortification of Boston neck was followed by a measure which excited still greater alarm. The time for the general muster of the militia approached. Under real or pretended apprehensions from their violence, the ammunition and stores which were lodged in the provincial arsenal at Cambridge, and the powder in the magazines at Charlestown, and some other places which was partly private and partly provincial property, were seized, by order of the governor, and conveyed to Boston.

The strengthening of Boston Neck was soon followed by a decision that generated even more worry. The date for the general assembly of the militia was coming up. Due to real or feigned fears of their aggression, the ammunition and supplies stored in the provincial arsenal at Cambridge, along with the gunpowder in the magazines at Charlestown and a few other locations—some of which were private property and some provincial—were confiscated by the governor's order and transported to Boston.

Under the ferment excited by this measure, the people assembled in great numbers, and were with difficulty dissuaded from marching to Boston, and demanding a re-delivery of the stores. Not long afterwards, the fort at Portsmouth in New Hampshire was stormed by an armed body of provincials; and the powder it contained was transported to a place of safety. A similar measure was adopted in Rhode Island.

Under the excitement caused by this measure, a large crowd gathered, and it took a lot of effort to convince them not to march to Boston to demand the return of the supplies. Soon after, an armed group of locals stormed the fort at Portsmouth in New Hampshire and moved the gunpowder it had to a safe location. A similar action was taken in Rhode Island.

About the same time a report reached Connecticut that the ships and troops had attacked Boston, and were actually firing on the town. Several thousand men immediately assembled in arms, and marched with great expedition a considerable distance, before they were undeceived.

About the same time, a report came into Connecticut that the ships and troops had attacked Boston and were actually firing on the city. Several thousand men quickly gathered with weapons and marched a long way before they realized the truth.

It was in the midst of these ferments, and while these indications of an opinion that hostilities might be expected daily were multiplying on every side, that the people of Suffolk assembled in convention, and passed the resolutions already mentioned, which in boldness surpass any that had been adopted.

It was during this turmoil, and as signs that conflicts might break out any day were increasing all around, that the people of Suffolk gathered in convention and passed the resolutions previously mentioned, which were bolder than any that had been adopted before.

Provincial congress in Massachusetts.

Before the general agitation had risen to its present alarming height, governor Gage had issued writs for the election of members to a general assembly. These writs were afterwards countermanded by proclamation; but the proclamation was disregarded; the elections were held; and the delegates, who assembled and voted themselves a provincial congress, conducted the affairs of the colony as if they had been regularly invested with all the powers of government; and their recommendations were respected as sacred laws.

Before the widespread unrest escalated to its current alarming level, Governor Gage had issued writs for the election of members to a general assembly. These writs were later canceled by proclamation; however, the proclamation was ignored. The elections took place anyway, and the delegates, who gathered and declared themselves a provincial congress, managed the colony's affairs as if they had been officially granted all the powers of government, and their recommendations were treated as sacred laws.

Prepares for defence.

They drew up a plan for the defence of the province; provided magazines, ammunition and prepares stores for twelve thousand militia; and enrolled a number of minute men, a term designating a select part of the militia, who engaged to appear in arms at a minute's warning.

They created a plan for defending the province, stocked up on supplies, ammunition, and equipment for twelve thousand militia members, and recruited a group of minute men, a term used for a select portion of the militia who promised to be ready to fight at a moment's notice.

On the approach of winter, the general had ordered temporary barracks to be erected for the troops, partly for their security, and partly to prevent the disorders which would unavoidably result from quartering them in the town. Such however was the detestation in which they were held, that the select men and committees obliged the workmen to desist from the work, although they were paid for their labour by the crown, and although employment could, at that time, be seldom obtained. He was not much more successful in his endeavours to obtain carpenters in New York; and it was with considerable difficulty that these temporary lodgments could be erected.

As winter was approaching, the general had ordered temporary barracks to be put up for the troops, partly for their safety and partly to avoid the chaos that would inevitably come from housing them in the town. However, the troops were so disliked that the local leaders and committees forced the workers to stop the construction, even though the crown was paying them for their labor, and jobs were hard to come by at that time. He had little more success finding carpenters in New York, and it was quite challenging to get these temporary accommodations set up.

The agency for purchasing winter covering for the troops was offered to almost every merchant in New York; but such was the danger of engaging in this odious employment, that not only those who were attached to the party resisting the views of administration, but those also who were in secret friendly to those views, refused undertaking it, and declared "that they never would supply any article for the benefit of men who were sent as enemies to their country."

The agency for buying winter supplies for the troops was offered to nearly every merchant in New York; however, the risk of getting involved in this unpopular task was so great that not only those who opposed the administration's views but also those who privately supported them refused to take it on. They stated "that they would never provide any supplies for the benefit of men who were sent as enemies to their country."

King's speech to parliament.

In Great Britain, a new parliament was assembled; and the King, in his opening speech, informed them, "that a most daring spirit of resistance and disobedience still prevailed in Massachusetts, and had broken forth in fresh violences of a very criminal nature; that the most proper and effectual measures had been taken to prevent these mischiefs; and that they might depend upon a firm resolution to withstand every attempt to weaken or impair the supreme authority of this legislature over all the dominions of the crown."

In Great Britain, a new parliament was convened, and the King, in his opening speech, informed them that a bold spirit of resistance and disobedience still existed in Massachusetts and had erupted in new acts of serious wrongdoing. He stated that the most appropriate and effective measures had been put in place to stop these issues and assured them of a strong commitment to resist any attempt to weaken or undermine the supreme authority of this legislature over all the crown's territories.

Proceedings of that body.

The addresses re-echoed the sentiments of the speech; all amendments to which were rejected in both houses by considerable majorities.[243] Yet the business respecting America was not promptly introduced. Administration seems to have hesitated on the course to be adopted; and the cabinet is said to have been divided respecting future measures. 1775The few friends of conciliation availed themselves of this delay, to bring forward propositions which might restore harmony to the empire. Lord Chatham was not yet dead. "This splendid orb," to use the bold metaphor of Mr. Burke, "was not yet entirely set. The western horizon was still in a blaze with his descending glory;" and the evening of a life which had exhibited one bright unchequered course of elevated patriotism, was devoted to the service of that country whose aggrandisement seemed to have swallowed up every other passion of his soul. Taking a prophetic view of the future, he demonstrated the impossibility of subjugating America, and urged, with all the powers of his vast mind, the immediate removal of the troops from Boston, as a measure indispensably necessary, to open the way for an adjustment of the existing differences with the colonies. Not discouraged by the great majority against this motion, he brought forward a bill for settling the troubles in America, which was rejected by sixty-one to thirty-two voices.

The addresses echoed the feelings of the speech; all amendments to it were rejected in both houses by significant majorities.[243] However, the issue regarding America was not immediately brought up. The administration appeared to be uncertain about the course to take, and the cabinet was reportedly divided on future actions. 1775The few supporters of compromise took advantage of this delay to propose ideas that could restore harmony to the empire. Lord Chatham was still alive. "This splendid orb," to quote the bold metaphor of Mr. Burke, "was not yet entirely set. The western horizon was still ablaze with his fading glory;" and the evening of a life that had showcased one continuous path of high patriotism was dedicated to the service of the country, which seemed to overshadow every other passion of his soul. Looking ahead, he argued it was impossible to subdue America and insisted, with all the power of his immense intellect, on the immediate withdrawal of troops from Boston as a crucial step needed to pave the way for resolving the existing conflicts with the colonies. Undeterred by the strong opposition to this motion, he proposed a bill to resolve the troubles in America, which was defeated by sixty-one to thirty-two votes.

The day after the rejection of this bill, lord North moved, in the house of commons, an address to his Majesty, declaring that, from a serious consideration of the American papers, "they find a rebellion actually exists in the province of Massachusetts Bay." In the course of the debate on this address, several professional gentlemen spoke with the utmost contempt of the military character of the Americans; and general Grant, who ought to have known better, declared that "at the head of five regiments of infantry, he would undertake to traverse the whole country, and drive the inhabitants from one end of the continent to the other."

The day after the rejection of this bill, Lord North brought forward, in the House of Commons, a motion to address his Majesty, stating that after seriously reviewing the American papers, "they find that a rebellion is actually happening in the province of Massachusetts Bay." During the debate on this motion, several professionals spoke with complete disdain for the military abilities of the Americans; and General Grant, who should have known better, claimed that "with five regiments of infantry, he would take on the entire country and push the people from one end of the continent to the other."

The address was carried by 288 to 106; and on a conference, the house of lords agreed to join in it. Lord North, soon after, moved a bill for restraining the trade and commerce of the New England provinces, and prohibiting them from carrying on the fisheries on the banks of Newfoundland.[244]

The address was passed by 288 to 106; and in a meeting, the House of Lords agreed to support it. Shortly after, Lord North proposed a bill to limit the trade and commerce of the New England provinces and to ban them from fishing on the banks of Newfoundland.[244]

While this bill was pending, and only vengeance was breathed by the majority, his lordship, to the astonishment of all, suddenly moved, what he termed his conciliatory proposition. Its amount was, that parliament would forbear to tax any colony, which should tax itself in such a sum as would be perfectly satisfactory. Apparent as it must have been that this proposition would not be accepted in America, it was received with indignation by the majority of the house; and ministers found some difficulty in showing that it was in maintenance of the right to tax the colonies. Before it could be adopted lord North condescended to make the dangerous, and not very reputable acknowledgment, that it was a proposition designed to divide America, and to unite Great Britain. It was transmitted to the governors of the several colonies, in a circular letter from lord Dartmouth, with directions to use their utmost influence to prevail on the legislatures to accede to the proposed compromise. These endeavours were not successful. The colonists were universally impressed with too strong a conviction of the importance of union, and understood too well the real principle of the contest, to suffer themselves to be divided or deceived by a proposition, conciliatory only in name.

While this bill was being considered, and with only revenge being expressed by the majority, his lordship, to everyone's surprise, suddenly proposed what he called his conciliatory suggestion. Essentially, he suggested that Parliament would refrain from taxing any colony that would tax itself in a way that was completely adequate. It was obvious that this suggestion wouldn't be accepted in America, and it was met with anger by the majority of the house; ministers struggled to demonstrate that it upheld the right to tax the colonies. Before it could be accepted, Lord North reluctantly admitted that it was a proposal aimed at dividing America and uniting Great Britain. It was sent to the governors of the different colonies in a circular letter from Lord Dartmouth, instructing them to use their greatest efforts to persuade the legislatures to agree to the proposed compromise. These efforts were unsuccessful. The colonists held a strong belief in the importance of unity and understood too well the real issue at stake to allow themselves to be split or misled by a proposition that was conciliatory only in name.

After the passage of the bill for restraining the trade of New England, information was received that the inhabitants of the middle and southern colonies, were supporting their northern brethren in every measure of opposition. In consequence of this intelligence, a second bill was passed for imposing similar restrictions on East and West Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and the counties on the Delaware. The favourite colonies of New York and North Carolina were omitted, as being less disaffected than the others. Fortunately, some time afterwards, the house of commons refused to hear a petition from the legislature of New York, which alone had declined acceding to the resolutions of congress, on the suggestion of the minister that it contained claims incompatible with the supremacy of parliament. This haughty rejection had some tendency to convince the advocates of milder measures than had been adopted in their sister colonies, that there was no medium between resistance and absolute submission.

After the bill to restrict trade in New England was passed, news came in that the people in the middle and southern colonies were backing their northern neighbors in every opposing action. As a result of this information, a second bill was passed to impose similar restrictions on East and West Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, South Carolina, and the counties along the Delaware. The favored colonies of New York and North Carolina were left out, as they were seen as less rebellious than the others. Luckily, some time later, the House of Commons refused to consider a petition from the New York legislature, which was the only one that had not agreed to the decisions made by Congress, based on the minister's claim that it included demands that conflicted with the authority of Parliament. This dismissive refusal helped convince those who supported gentler approaches than had been taken by their neighboring colonies that there was no middle ground between resistance and complete submission.

The King's speech, and the proceedings of parliament, served only to convince the leaders of opposition in America, that they must indeed prepare to meet "mournful events." They had flattered themselves that the union of the colonies, the petition of congress to the King, and the address to the people of Great Britain, would produce happy effects. But these measures removed the delusion. The provincial congress of Massachusetts published a resolution informing the people that there was real cause to fear that the reasonable and just applications of that continent to Great Britain for peace, liberty, and safety, would not meet with a favourable reception; that, on the contrary, the tenor of their intelligence, and general appearances, furnished just cause for the apprehension that the sudden destruction of that colony, at least, was intended. They therefore urged the militia in general, and the minute men in particular, to spare neither time, pains, nor expense, to perfect themselves in military discipline; and also passed resolutions for procuring and making fire arms and bayonets.[245]

The King's speech and the events in parliament only made the opposition leaders in America realize that they really needed to prepare for "sad events." They had hoped that the unity of the colonies, the petition from Congress to the King, and the address to the people of Great Britain would lead to positive outcomes. But these actions shattered that illusion. The provincial congress of Massachusetts announced a resolution telling the people that there was genuine reason to fear that the reasonable and fair requests from the continent to Great Britain for peace, liberty, and safety would not be met positively; instead, the information they received and the overall situation gave them real cause for concern that the sudden destruction of that colony was likely intended. They therefore urged the militia in general, and the minute men in particular, to spare no time, effort, or expense to become proficient in military training; they also passed resolutions to acquire and manufacture firearms and bayonets.[245]

In the mean time, delegates were elected for the ensuing congress. Even in New York, where the influence of administration in the legislature had been sufficient to prevent an adoption of the recommendations of congress, a convention was chosen for the purpose of electing members to represent that province in the grand council of the colonies.

In the meantime, delegates were elected for the upcoming congress. Even in New York, where the government's influence in the legislature had been strong enough to stop the adoption of congress's recommendations, a convention was selected to choose members to represent that province in the grand council of the colonies.

In New England, although a determination not to commence hostility appears to have been maintained, an expectation of it, and a settled purpose to repel it, universally prevailed.

In New England, while there seems to have been a determination not to start any conflict, there was a widespread expectation of it, along with a strong intention to defend against it.

It was not long before the firmness of this resolution was put to the test.

It wasn't long before the strength of this decision was put to the test.

On the night preceding the 19th of April, general Gage detached lieutenant colonel Smith, and major Pitcairn, with the grenadiers and light infantry of the army, amounting to eight or nine hundred men, with orders to destroy some military stores which had been collected at Concord, about eighteen miles from Boston, notwithstanding the secrecy and dispatch which were used, the country was alarmed by messengers sent out by Doctor Warren; Battle of Lexington.and, on the arrival of the British troops at Lexington, about five in the morning, part of the company of militia belonging to the town, was found on the parade, under arms. Major Pitcairn, who led the van, galloped up, calling out, "disperse, rebels, disperse." He was followed close by his soldiers, who rushed upon the militia with loud huzzas. Some scattering guns were fired, which were immediately followed by a general discharge, and the firing was continued as long as any of the militia appeared. Eight men were killed, and several wounded.

On the night before April 19th, General Gage sent Lieutenant Colonel Smith and Major Pitcairn, along with the grenadiers and light infantry of the army, totaling about 800 or 900 men, with orders to destroy some military supplies that had been gathered in Concord, about eighteen miles from Boston. Despite their efforts to keep it secret and quick, the local community was alerted by messengers sent by Doctor Warren; Lexington Battle. When the British troops arrived in Lexington around 5 in the morning, some of the local militia were found assembled on the parade ground, ready for action. Major Pitcairn, who was in the lead, rode up and shouted, "Disperse, rebels, disperse." His soldiers followed closely behind, charging at the militia with loud cheers. A few shots were fired, which quickly led to a general exchange of gunfire, continuing as long as any of the militia were in sight. Eight men were killed and several were wounded.

After dispatching six companies of light infantry to guard two bridges which lay at some distance beyond the town, lieutenant colonel Smith proceeded to Concord. While the main body of the detachment was employed in destroying the stores in the town, some minute men and militia, who were collected from that place and its neighbourhood, having orders not to give the first fire, approached one of the bridges, as if to pass it in the character of common travellers. They were fired on, and two of them were killed. The fire was instantly returned, and a skirmish ensued, in which the regulars were worsted, and compelled to retreat with some loss. The alarm now becoming general, the people rushed to the scene of action, and attacked the King's troops on all sides. Skirmish succeeded skirmish, and they were driven, from post to post, into Lexington. Fortunately for the British, general Gage did not entertain precisely the opinion of the military character of the Americans, which had been expressed in the house of commons. Apprehending the expedition to be not entirely without hazard, he had, in the morning, detached lord Percy with sixteen companies of foot, a corps of marines, and two companies of artillery, to support lieutenant colonel Smith. This seasonable reinforcement, happening to reach Lexington about the time of his arrival at that place, kept the provincials at a distance with their field pieces, and gave the grenadiers and light infantry time to breathe. But as soon as they resumed their march, the attack was re-commenced; and an irregular but galling fire was kept up on each flank, as well as in front and rear, until they arrived, on the common of Charlestown. Without delay, they passed over the neck to Bunker's hill, where they remained secure for the night, under the protection of their ships of war; and, early next morning, crossed over to Boston.

After sending six companies of light infantry to guard two bridges a bit outside the town, Lieutenant Colonel Smith headed to Concord. While most of the troops were busy destroying the supplies in the town, a group of minutemen and militia from that area, who had been told not to fire first, approached one of the bridges as if they were just regular travelers. They were shot at, and two of them were killed. They quickly returned fire, leading to a skirmish in which the regular troops were overwhelmed and forced to retreat with some losses. As news spread, more people rushed to the scene and attacked the King's troops from all sides. Skirmishes followed, pushing the British back from position to position until they reached Lexington. Luckily for the British, General Gage didn’t fully share the opinion of the military capability of the Americans that had been voiced in the House of Commons. Aware that the mission could be risky, he had sent Lord Percy with sixteen companies of foot, a group of marines, and two artillery companies that morning to support Lieutenant Colonel Smith. This timely reinforcement arrived in Lexington around the same time as Smith, keeping the provincials at bay with their field pieces and giving the grenadiers and light infantry a chance to regroup. But as soon as they resumed their march, the attack resumed; an irregular but constant fire was maintained on both flanks as well as the front and rear until they reached the common in Charlestown. They quickly crossed the neck to Bunker Hill, where they stayed safe for the night under the protection of their warships; early the next morning, they crossed over to Boston.

In this action, the loss of the British in killed, wounded, and prisoners, was two hundred and seventy-three; while that of the provincials did not exceed ninety. This affair, however trivial in itself, was of great importance in its consequences. It was the commencement of a long and obstinate war, and had no inconsiderable influence on that war, by increasing the confidence which the Americans felt in themselves, and by encouraging opposition, with the hope of being successful. It supported the opinion which the colonists had taken up with some doubt, that courage and patriotism were ample substitutes for the knowledge of tactics; and that their skill in the use of fire arms, gave them a great superiority over their adversaries.

In this event, the British suffered a loss of two hundred and seventy-three in terms of killed, wounded, and captured soldiers, while the provincial forces' losses were less than ninety. Although this incident seemed minor at the time, it had significant consequences. It marked the beginning of a long and stubborn war and played a considerable role in boosting the Americans' self-confidence and encouraging their resistance with hopes of success. It reinforced the colonists' somewhat uncertain belief that courage and patriotism could effectively replace tactical knowledge, and that their skills with firearms gave them a significant advantage over their opponents.

Although the previous state of things was such as to render the commencement of hostilities unavoidable, each party seemed anxious to throw the blame on its opponent. The British officers alleged that they were fired on from a stone wall, before they attacked the militia at Lexington; while the Americans proved, by numerous depositions, that at Lexington, as well as at the bridge near Concord, the first fire was received by them. The statement made by the Americans is supported, not only by the testimony adduced, but by other circumstances. In numbers, the militia at Lexington did not exceed one-ninth of the British; and it is not probable that their friends would have provoked their fate while in that perilous situation, by commencing a fire on an enraged soldiery. It is also worthy of attention, that the Americans uniformly sought to cover their proceedings with the letter of the law; and, even after the affair at Lexington, made a point of receiving the first fire at the bridge beyond Concord.

Although the previous situation made the start of hostilities inevitable, both sides seemed eager to blame the other. The British officers claimed they were shot at from a stone wall before they attacked the militia at Lexington, while the Americans provided numerous testimonies showing that at both Lexington and the bridge near Concord, they were the ones who first came under fire. The Americans’ account is backed not only by the evidence presented but also by other circumstances. The militia at Lexington was outnumbered, with only about one-ninth of the British forces, and it’s unlikely that their supporters would have provoked a dangerous situation by firing at an angry military force. It’s also notable that the Americans consistently aimed to justify their actions legally and, even after the incident at Lexington, insisted on receiving the first shot at the bridge beyond Concord.

The provincial congress, desirous of manifesting the necessity under which the militia had acted, sent to their agents, the depositions which had been taken relative to the late action, with a letter to the inhabitants of Great Britain, stating that hostilities had been commenced against them, and detailing the circumstances attending that event.

The provincial congress, wanting to show why the militia had taken action, sent their representatives the statements that had been gathered about the recent event, along with a letter to the people of Great Britain, informing them that hostilities had begun against them and outlining the circumstances surrounding that event.

But they did not confine themselves to addresses. They immediately passed a resolution for raising thirteen thousand six hundred men in Massachusetts, to be commanded by general Ward; and called on New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, for their respective quotas, to complete an army of thirty thousand men for the common defence. They also authorised the receiver general to borrow one hundred thousand pounds on the credit of the colony, and to issue securities for the re-payment thereof, bearing an interest of six per centum per annum.

But they didn't just stick to speeches. They quickly passed a resolution to raise thirteen thousand six hundred men in Massachusetts, to be led by General Ward; and they asked New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Connecticut for their shares, to build an army of thirty thousand men for the common defense. They also gave the receiver general the authority to borrow one hundred thousand pounds based on the colony's credit and to issue securities for repayment, with an interest rate of six percent per year.

The neighbouring colonies complied promptly with this requisition; and, in the mean time, such numbers assembled voluntarily, that many were dismissed in consequence of the defect of means to subsist them in the field; and the King's troops were themselves blocked up in the peninsula of Boston.

The neighboring colonies quickly responded to this request; meanwhile, so many people gathered voluntarily that many were sent home because there weren't enough resources to support them in the field, and the King's troops were themselves trapped in the Boston peninsula.

About the same time, that enterprising spirit, which pervaded New England, manifested itself in an expedition of considerable merit.

About the same time, that adventurous spirit that filled New England showed up in a noteworthy expedition.

The possession of Ticonderoga and Crown Point, and the command of lakes George and Champlain, were objects of importance in the approaching conflict. It was known that these posts were weakly defended; and it was believed that the feeble garrisons remaining in them were the less to be dreaded, because they thought themselves perfectly secure. Under these impressions, some gentlemen of Connecticut, at the head of whom were Messrs. Deane, Wooster, and Parsons, formed the design of seizing these fortresses by surprise; and borrowed a small sum of money from the legislature of the colony, to enable them to carry on the expedition. About forty volunteers marched from Connecticut towards Bennington, where they expected to meet with colonel Ethan Allen, and to engage him to conduct the enterprise, and to raise an additional number of men.

The control of Ticonderoga and Crown Point, along with the command of Lake George and Lake Champlain, were important goals in the upcoming conflict. It was understood that these posts had weak defenses, and it was believed that the small garrisons there were less to be feared because they felt completely secure. With this in mind, some gentlemen from Connecticut, led by Messrs. Deane, Wooster, and Parsons, planned to take these fortresses by surprise; they borrowed a small amount of money from the colony's legislature to fund the expedition. About forty volunteers set out from Connecticut toward Bennington, where they hoped to meet Colonel Ethan Allen and persuade him to lead the mission and recruit more men.

Colonel Allen readily entered into their views, and engaged to meet them at Castleton. Two hundred and seventy men assembled at that place, where they were joined by colonel Arnold, who was associated with colonel Allen in the command. They reached lake Champlain in the night of the ninth of May. Ticonderoga surprised.Both Allen and Arnold embarked with the first division consisting of eighty-three men, who effected a landing without being discovered, and immediately marched against the fort, which, being completely surprised, surrendered without firing a gun. The garrison consisted of only forty-four rank and file, commanded by a captain and one lieutenant. Crown Point surrenders.From Ticonderoga, colonel Seth Warren was detached to take possession of Crown Point, which was garrisoned only by a sergeant and twelve men. This service was immediately executed, and the fort was taken without opposition.

Colonel Allen quickly agreed with their plans and committed to meeting them at Castleton. Two hundred and seventy men gathered at that location, where they were joined by Colonel Arnold, who partnered with Colonel Allen in command. They arrived at Lake Champlain on the night of May ninth. Ticonderoga was unexpected. Both Allen and Arnold set off with the first group of eighty-three men, who landed undetected and immediately marched toward the fort, which was completely caught off guard and surrendered without firing a shot. The garrison had only forty-four soldiers, led by a captain and a lieutenant. Crown Point gives up. From Ticonderoga, Colonel Seth Warren was sent to take control of Crown Point, which was defended by just a sergeant and twelve men. This task was quickly carried out, and the fort was captured without any resistance.

At both these places, military stores of considerable value fell into the hands of the Americans. The pass at Skeensborough was seized about the same time by a body of volunteers from Connecticut.

At both of these locations, valuable military supplies were captured by the Americans. The pass at Skeensborough was taken around the same time by a group of volunteers from Connecticut.

To complete the objects of the expedition, it was necessary to obtain the command of the lakes, which could be accomplished only by seizing a sloop of war lying at St. Johns. This service was effected by Arnold, who, having manned and armed a schooner found in South bay, surprised the sloop, and took possession of her without opposition.

To achieve the goals of the expedition, it was essential to take control of the lakes, which could only be done by capturing a war sloop docked at St. Johns. Arnold handled this task by crew and arming a schooner he found in South Bay, surprising the sloop and taking control of it without any resistance.

Thus, by the enterprise of a few individuals, and without the loss of a single man, the important posts of Ticonderoga and Crown Point were acquired, with the command of the lakes on which they stand.

Thus, through the efforts of a few individuals, and without losing a single person, the crucial locations of Ticonderoga and Crown Point were taken, along with control of the lakes they overlook.

Meeting of congress.

Intelligence of the capture of Ticonderoga was immediately transmitted to congress, then just assembled at Philadelphia. The resolutions passed on the occasion, furnish strong evidence of the solicitude felt by that body, to exonerate the government, in the opinion of the people, from all suspicion of provoking a continuance of the war, by transcending the limits of self defence. Indubitable evidence, it was asserted, had been received of a design for a cruel invasion of the colonies from Canada, for the purpose of destroying their lives and liberties; and it was averred that some steps had actually been taken towards carrying this design into execution. To a justifiable desire of securing themselves from so heavy a calamity, was attributed the seizure of the posts on the lakes by the neighbouring inhabitants; and it was recommended to the committees of New York and Albany to take immediate measures for the removal of the cannon and military stores to some place on the south end of lake George, there to be preserved in safety. An exact inventory of the stores was directed to be taken, "in order that they might be safely returned, when the restoration of the former harmony between Great Britain and the colonies, so ardently wished for by the latter, should render it prudent, and consistent with the overruling law of self preservation."

The news about the capture of Ticonderoga was quickly sent to Congress, which had just convened in Philadelphia. The resolutions passed at that time clearly show how concerned they were to clear the government of any suspicion from the public that it had incited the ongoing war by going beyond self-defense. They claimed there was undeniable evidence of a planned brutal invasion of the colonies from Canada, intended to destroy their lives and freedoms; it was also asserted that some actions had actually been taken to carry out this plan. The nearby residents' strong urge to protect themselves from such a disaster was seen as the reason for seizing the posts on the lakes. They recommended that the committees of New York and Albany act quickly to move the cannon and military supplies to a safe location at the southern end of Lake George. An accurate inventory of the supplies was to be made, "so that they could be safely returned when the restoration of the previous harmony between Great Britain and the colonies, which the latter so eagerly desired, would make it wise and in line with the fundamental law of self-preservation."

Measures, however, were adopted to maintain the posts; but, to quiet the apprehensions of their neighbours, congress resolved that, having nothing more in view than self defence, "no expedition or incursion ought to be undertaken or made by any colony, or body of colonists, against, or into, Canada."

Measures were taken to keep the posts, but to calm their neighbors' fears, Congress decided that, with the only goal being self-defense, "no expedition or incursion should be carried out by any colony, or group of colonists, against Canada."

This resolution was translated into the French language, and transmitted to the people of that province, in a letter in which all their feelings, and particularly their known attachment to France, were dexterously assailed; and the effort was earnestly made to kindle in their bosoms, that enthusiastic love of liberty which was felt too strongly by the authors of the letter, to permit the belief that it could be inoperative with others.

This resolution was translated into French and sent to the people of that province in a letter that skillfully challenged all their sentiments, especially their well-known loyalty to France. The writers made a sincere effort to ignite in them that passionate love of freedom that they themselves felt so strongly, hoping it would resonate just as powerfully with others.

During these transactions, generals Howe, Burgoyne, and Clinton, arrived at Boston, soon after which general Gage issued a proclamation declaring martial law to be in force, and offering pardon to those who would lay down their arms and submit to the King, with the exception of Samuel Adams, and John Hancock.

During these events, Generals Howe, Burgoyne, and Clinton arrived in Boston, shortly after which General Gage issued a proclamation declaring martial law in effect and offering forgiveness to those who would surrender their weapons and submit to the King, with the exception of Samuel Adams and John Hancock.

On receiving intelligence of the battle of Lexington, New York appeared to hesitate no longer. In that place also, the spirit which animated the colonies generally, obtained the ascendancy. Yet the royal party remained formidable; and it was thought advisable to march a body of Connecticut troops into the neighbourhood, professedly to protect the town against some British regiments expected from Ireland, but really with the design of protecting the patriotic party.

On hearing about the battle of Lexington, New York seemed to hesitate no more. In that city, the enthusiasm that inspired the colonies in general took charge. However, the loyalists still posed a significant threat, so it was deemed wise to send some Connecticut troops into the area, officially to guard the town against British regiments thought to be coming from Ireland, but actually to support the patriot movement.

The middle and southern colonies, though not so forward as those of the north, laid aside the established government, and prepared for hostilities.

The middle and southern colonies, while not as proactive as those in the north, set aside the established government and got ready for conflict.

Transactions in Virginia.

In Virginia, the governor, lord Dunmore, had just returned from a successful expedition against the Indians, in which he had acquired considerable popularity. Presuming too much on the favour of the moment, and dissatisfied with some recommendations concerning the militia and independent companies made by the colonial convention which had assembled in Richmond, he employed the captain of an armed vessel then lying in James river, a few miles from Williamsburg, to convey to his ship by night, a part of the powder in the magazine, belonging to the colony.

In Virginia, Governor Lord Dunmore had just come back from a successful expedition against the Native Americans, which had made him pretty popular. Overestimating the support he had at that time and unhappy with some recommendations about the militia and independent companies made by the colonial convention that had gathered in Richmond, he used the captain of an armed ship that was lying in the James River, a few miles from Williamsburg, to secretly transfer some of the gunpowder from the colony's magazine to his ship at night.

This measure, though conducted with great secrecy, was discovered; and the people of the town assembled next morning in arms, for the purpose of demanding restitution of the property which had been taken. The magistrates, having prevailed on them to disperse, presented an address to the governor, remonstrating against the removal of the powder, which they alleged to be the more injurious, because it was necessary for their defence in the event of an insurrection among their slaves.

This action, although carried out in great secrecy, was found out; and the townspeople gathered the next morning armed, intending to demand the return of the property that had been taken. The officials, managing to persuade them to disperse, delivered a statement to the governor, protesting against the removal of the gunpowder, which they claimed was even more harmful because it was essential for their defense in case of a rebellion among their slaves.

The governor acknowledged that the powder had been removed by his order, but gave assurances that he would restore it, if an insurrection of the slaves should render the measure necessary. Unsatisfactory as this answer was, no farther means were used in Williamsburg for its recovery.

The governor admitted that he had ordered the powder to be removed but promised that he would bring it back if a slave uprising made it necessary. Although this response was unsatisfactory, no further attempts were made in Williamsburg to get it back.

This transaction excited a strong sensation in the interior of the country. Meetings were held in several counties, and the conduct of the governor was greatly condemned. The independent companies of Hanover and King William, at the instance of Mr. Patrick Henry, a member of congress, assembled, and marched for Williamsburg, with the avowed design of compelling restitution of the powder, or of obtaining its value. Their march was stopped by the active interposition of Mr. Braxton, who obtained from the King's receiver general, a bill for the value of the property that had been removed, with which he returned to the companies, and prevailed on them to relinquish a farther prosecution of the enterprise.[246]

This event sparked a strong reaction throughout the country. Meetings were held in several counties, and the governor's actions were widely condemned. The independent groups from Hanover and King William, at the request of Mr. Patrick Henry, a member of Congress, gathered and marched to Williamsburg with the intention of getting the stolen gunpowder back or receiving its value. Their march was halted by Mr. Braxton, who managed to get a bill from the King's receiver general for the value of the missing property. He returned to the groups and convinced them to abandon their pursuit of the matter.[246]

The alarm occasioned by this movement induced lady Dunmore, to retire with her family on board the Fowey man of war, lying in James river; whilst his lordship fortified his palace, which he garrisoned with a corps of marines; and published a proclamation in which he charged those who had procured the bill from the receiver general, with rebellious practices.

The alarm caused by this movement led Lady Dunmore to take her family on board the Fowey warship, anchored in James River; while his lordship reinforced his palace, which he staffed with a group of marines; and issued a proclamation accusing those who had obtained the bill from the receiver general of rebellious actions.

During this state of irritation, lord North's conciliatory proposition was received; and an assembly was suddenly called, to whose consideration it was submitted. The governor used all his address to procure its acceptance; but, in Virginia, as in the other colonies, it was rejected, because it obviously involved a surrender of the whole subject in contest.

During this moment of frustration, Lord North's conciliatory proposal was presented, and a meeting was quickly organized to discuss it. The governor tried everything he could to get it accepted; however, in Virginia, just like in the other colonies, it was turned down because it clearly meant giving up on the entire dispute at hand.

One of the first measures of the assembly was to inquire into the causes of the late disturbances, and particularly to examine the state of the magazine. Although this building belonged to the colony, it was in the custody of the governor; and, before admittance could be obtained; some persons of the neighbourhood broke into it, one of whom was wounded by a spring gun, and it was found that the powder which remained had been buried, and that the guns were deprived of their locks. Governor Dunmore retires to the Fowey ship of war.These circumstances excited so great a ferment that the governor thought proper to withdraw to the Fowey man of war. Several letters passed between him and the legislature containing reciprocal complaints of each other, in the course of which they pressed his return to the seat of government, while he insisted on their coming on board the Fowey. They were content that he should, even there, give his assent to some bills that were prepared, but he refused so to do, and the assembly dissolved itself; the members being generally elected to a convention then about to meet in Richmond.

One of the first actions of the assembly was to investigate the reasons behind the recent disturbances and specifically to check the condition of the magazine. Although this building belonged to the colony, it was under the governor's control. Before anyone could get in, some locals broke in, and one of them got hurt by a spring gun. It was discovered that the remaining gunpowder had been buried and that the guns had their locks removed. Governor Dunmore retreats to the warship Fowey. These events created such a stir that the governor decided to withdraw to the Fowey warship. Several letters were exchanged between him and the legislature, filled with mutual complaints. During this exchange, they urged him to return to the seat of government, while he insisted they come aboard the Fowey. They were fine with him giving his approval to some prepared bills there, but he refused to do so, leading the assembly to dissolve itself, as most members were elected to a convention set to meet in Richmond.

Thus terminated for ever, the regal government in Virginia.

Thus ended the royal government in Virginia for good.

Provisional congress of South Carolina.

In South Carolina, so soon as intelligence of the battle of Lexington was received, a provincial congress was called by the committee of correspondence. An association was formed, the members of which pledged themselves to each other to repel force by force, whenever the continental or provincial congress should determine it to be necessary; and declared that they would hold all those inimical to the colonies, who should refuse to subscribe it. The congress also determined to put the town and province in a posture of defence, and agreed to raise two regiments of infantry, and one of rangers.

In South Carolina, as soon as word of the Battle of Lexington got out, a provincial congress was called by the committee of correspondence. An association was formed where members promised to stand together and fight back against force whenever the continental or provincial congress decided it was necessary. They also stated that anyone opposing the colonies who refused to join would be considered an enemy. The congress also decided to prepare the town and the province for defense and agreed to raise two infantry regiments and one ranger regiment.

Arrival of lord William Campbell.

While the congress was in session, lord William Campbell, who had been appointed governor, arrived in the province, and was received with those demonstrations of joy which had been usual on such occasions. The congress waited on him with an address expressing the causes of their proceedings; in which they declared that no love of innovation, no desire of altering the constitution of government, no lust of independence, had the least influence on their councils; but that they had been compelled to associate and take up arms, solely for the preservation, and in defence, of their lives, liberties, and property. They entreated his excellency to make such a representation of the state of the colony, and of their true motives, as to assure his majesty that he had no subjects who more sincerely desired to testify their loyalty and affection, or would be more willing to devote their lives and fortunes to his real service. His lordship returned a mild and prudent answer.[247]

While Congress was in session, Lord William Campbell, who had been appointed governor, arrived in the province and was welcomed with the usual celebrations. Congress addressed him, explaining their actions and stating that no desire for change, no intention to alter the government, and no craving for independence had influenced their decisions. Instead, they had been forced to unite and take up arms solely to protect their lives, freedoms, and property. They asked his excellency to communicate the state of the colony and their true intentions to assure His Majesty that he had no subjects who were more genuinely committed to showing their loyalty and support, or who would be more willing to dedicate their lives and resources to his service. His lordship replied with a calm and thoughtful response.[247]

For some time lord William Campbell conducted himself with such apparent moderation, as to remain on good terms with the leaders of the opposition; but he was secretly exerting all the influence of his station to defeat their views; and was, at length, detected in carrying on negotiations with the Indians, and with the disaffected in the interior. These people had been induced to believe that the inhabitants of the sea coast, in order to exempt their tea from a trifling tax, were about to engage them in a contest, which would deprive them of their salt, osnaburgs, and other imported articles of absolute necessity. The detection of these intrigues excited such a ferment that the governor was compelled to fly from Charleston, and take refuge on board a ship of war in the river. The government was then, as elsewhere, taken entirely into the hands of men chosen by the people; and a body of provincial troops was ordered into that part of the country which adhered to the royal cause, where many individuals, contrary to the advice of governor Campbell, had risen in arms. The leaders were seized, and their followers dispersed.

For a while, Lord William Campbell acted with such apparent moderation that he managed to stay on good terms with the opposition leaders. However, he was secretly using all his influence to undermine their plans and was eventually caught negotiating with the Native Americans and the discontented in the interior. These groups had been led to believe that the coastal residents, to avoid a small tax on tea, were about to pull them into a conflict that would cost them their salt, osnaburgs, and other essential imported goods. The exposure of these schemes stirred up such outrage that the governor had to escape from Charleston and seek refuge on a warship in the river. The government was then entirely taken over by people elected by the citizens, and a group of provincial troops was sent to the area that supported the royal cause, where many individuals—against Governor Campbell's advice—had taken up arms. The leaders were captured, and their followers were scattered.

In North Carolina also, governor Martin was charged with fomenting a civil war, and exciting an insurrection among the negroes. Relying on the aid he expected from the disaffected, especially from some Highland emigrants, he made preparations for the defence of his palace; but the people taking the alarm before his troops were raised, he was compelled to seek safety on board a sloop of war in Cape Fear river; soon after which, the committee resolved "that no person or persons whatsoever should have any correspondence with him, on pain of being deemed enemies to the liberties of America, and dealt with accordingly."

In North Carolina, Governor Martin was accused of inciting a civil war and stirring up an uprising among the enslaved people. Counting on support from those who were unhappy, especially some Highland emigrants, he got ready to defend his palace. However, the people became alarmed before he could gather his troops, forcing him to seek refuge on a warship in the Cape Fear River. Shortly after that, the committee decided that "no person or persons whatsoever should have any communication with him, under the threat of being considered enemies to the liberties of America and treated accordingly."

As soon as congress was organised, Mr. Hancock laid before that body the depositions showing that, in the battle of Lexington, the King's troops were the aggressors; together with the proceedings of the provincial congress of Massachusetts on that subject.

As soon as Congress was organized, Mr. Hancock presented to that body the statements showing that, in the battle of Lexington, the King's troops were the aggressors; along with the actions of the provincial Congress of Massachusetts on that issue.

The affairs of America were now arrived at a crisis to which they had been, for some time, rapidly tending; and it had become necessary for the delegates of the other provinces finally to determine, either to embark with New England in war, or, by separating from her, to surrender the object for which they had jointly contended, and submit to that unlimited supremacy which was claimed by parliament.

The situation in America had reached a critical point that had been building for some time; it had become essential for the delegates from the other areas to finally decide whether to join New England in war or, by breaking away from them, to give up the goal they had all been fighting for and accept the complete control that Parliament was claiming.

Even among the well informed, the opinion, that the contest would ultimately be determined by the sword, had not become general. The hope had been indulged by many of the popular leaders, that the union of the colonies, the extent and serious aspect of the opposition, and the distress which their non-importation agreements would produce among the merchants and manufacturers of the parent state, would induce administration to recede from its high pretensions, and restore harmony and free intercourse. This opinion had derived strength from the communications made them by their zealous friends in England. The divisions and discontents of that country had been represented as much greater than the fact would justify; and the exhortations transmitted to them to persevere in the honourable course which had been commenced with so much glory, had generally been accompanied with assurances that success would yet crown their patriotic labours. Many had engaged with zeal in the resistance made by America, and had acted on a full conviction of the correctness of the principles for which they contended, who would have felt some reluctance in supporting the measures which had been adopted, had they believed that those measures would produce war. But each party counted too much on the divisions of the other; and each seems to have taken step after step, in the hope that its adversary would yield the point in contest, without resorting to open force. Thus, on both sides, the public feeling had been gradually conducted to a point, which would, in the first instance, have been viewed with horror, and had been prepared for events, which, in the beginning of the controversy, would have alarmed the most intrepid. The prevailing sentiment in the middle and southern colonies still was, that a reconciliation, on the terms proposed by America, was not even yet impracticable, and was devoutly to be wished; but that war was to be preferred to a surrender of those rights, for which they had contended, and to which they believed every British subject, wherever placed, to be unquestionably entitled. They did not hesitate therefore which part of the alternative to embrace; and their delegates united cordially with those of the north, in such measures as the exigency required. The resolution was unanimous that, as hostilities had actually commenced, and as large reinforcements to the British army were expected, these colonies should be immediately put in a state of defence, and the militia of New York be armed and trained, and kept in readiness to act at a moment's warning. Congress also determined to embody a number of men, without delay, for the protection of the inhabitants of that place, but did not authorise opposition to the landing of any troops which might be ordered to that station by the crown. The convention of New York had already consulted congress on this subject, and had been advised to permit the soldiers to take possession of the barracks, and to remain there so long as they conducted themselves peaceably; but, if they should commit hostilities, or invade private property, to repel force by force. Thus anxious was congress even after a battle had been fought, not to widen the breach between the two countries. In addition to the real wish for reconciliation, sound policy directed that the people of America should engage in the arduous conflict which was approaching, with a perfect conviction that it was forced upon them, and not invited by the intemperate conduct of their leaders. The divisions existing in several of the States suggested the propriety of this conduct, even to those who despaired of deriving any other benefit from it, than a greater degree of union among their own countrymen. In this spirit, congress mingled with the resolutions for putting the country in a state of defence, others expressing the most earnest wish for reconciliation with the mother country, to effect which, that body determined to address, once more, an humble and dutiful petition to the King, and to adopt measures for opening a negotiation in order "to accommodate the unhappy disputes subsisting between Great Britain and the colonies."

Even among the well-informed, the belief that the conflict would ultimately be resolved by violence hadn’t become widespread. Many popular leaders hoped that the unity of the colonies, the serious nature of the opposition, and the economic struggles created by their non-importation agreements would convince the government to back down from its strong stance and restore peace and free trade. This belief was bolstered by messages from their passionate supporters in England. The divisions and discontent in that country were portrayed as much greater than reality warranted, and the encouragement to continue the honorable path they had started with such pride usually came with assurances that their patriotic efforts would eventually succeed. Many who actively participated in America’s resistance firmly believed in the principles they were fighting for but would have hesitated to support the measures taken if they had thought those measures would lead to war. However, both sides overestimated the divisions within the other. Each side took steps expecting the opponent would concede without resorting to open conflict. As a result, public sentiment gradually reached a level that would have initially been met with horror, preparing everyone for events that, at the start of the dispute, would have frightened even the bravest. The common view in the middle and southern colonies was that reconciliation on America’s proposed terms was still possible and deeply desired, but that war was preferable to surrendering the rights they had fought for, which they believed every British subject was undoubtedly entitled to. Therefore, they did not hesitate in choosing which option to pursue, and their delegates worked together with those from the north to take necessary action. It was unanimously agreed that, with hostilities already started and large reinforcements for the British army expected, these colonies should immediately prepare for defense, and the militia of New York should be armed, trained, and ready to act at a moment’s notice. Congress also decided to gather a number of men quickly to protect the inhabitants of that area but did not authorize resistance to any troops that might be sent there by the crown. The convention of New York had already consulted Congress on this subject and had been advised to allow the soldiers to occupy the barracks as long as they behaved peacefully; however, if they committed acts of aggression or invaded private property, they should repel force with force. Congress was thus eager, even after a battle had occurred, not to escalate the divide between the two countries. Along with the genuine desire for reconciliation, it was strategically wise for the people of America to enter the coming challenging conflict fully believing that it was thrust upon them, not sparked by the reckless actions of their leaders. The existing divisions among several states underscored the wisdom of this approach, even for those who saw little benefit other than greater unity among their fellow countrymen. In this spirit, Congress combined their resolutions for preparing the country for defense with strong expressions of their wish for reconciliation with the mother country, deciding once again to humbly and dutifully petition the King and to take steps toward opening negotiations to resolve the unfortunate disputes between Great Britain and the colonies.

As no great confidence could be placed in the success of pacific propositions, the resolution for putting the country in a state of defence was accompanied with others rendered necessary by that undetermined state between war and peace, in which America was placed. All exports to those colonies, which had not deputed members to congress, were stopped; and all supplies of provisions, and other necessaries, to the British fisheries, or to the army or navy in Massachusetts Bay, or to any vessels employed in transporting British troops to America, or from one colony to another, were prohibited. Though this resolution was only an extension of the system of commercial resistance which had been adopted before the commencement of hostilities, and was evidently provoked by the late act of parliament, it seems to have been entirely unexpected, and certainly produced great distress.

Since there was little confidence in the success of peaceful proposals, the decision to prepare the country for defense was made alongside other measures necessary for dealing with the uncertain situation between war and peace that America found itself in. All exports to the colonies that had not sent representatives to Congress were halted, and all supplies of food and other essentials to the British fisheries, or to the army or navy in Massachusetts Bay, or to any ships transporting British troops to America or between colonies were banned. Although this decision was just an extension of the commercial resistance strategy adopted before hostilities began and was clearly triggered by the recent act of Parliament, it seemed to come as a complete surprise and certainly caused significant hardship.

Massachusetts having stated the embarrassments resulting from being without a regular government, "at a time when an army was to be raised to defend themselves against the butcheries and devastations of their implacable enemies," and having declared a readiness to conform to such general plan as congress might recommend to the colonies, it was resolved "that no obedience is due to the act of parliament for altering the charter of that colony, nor to officers who, instead of observing that charter, seek its subversion." The governor and lieutenant governor, therefore, were to be considered as absent, and their offices vacant. To avoid the intolerable inconveniences arising from a total suspension of government, "especially at a time when general Gage had actually levied war, and was carrying on hostilities against his majesty's peaceable and loyal subjects in that colony," it was "recommended to the convention to write letters to the inhabitants of the several places which are entitled to representation in the assembly, requesting them to choose such representatives; and that such assembly or council exercise the powers of government until a governor of his majesty's appointment will consent to govern the colony, according to its charter."[248]

Massachusetts pointed out the difficulties of being without a proper government "at a time when an army needed to be raised to defend themselves against the killings and destruction by their relentless enemies." They expressed their willingness to follow whatever plan Congress might suggest to the colonies. It was decided "that no obedience is owed to the act of Parliament that alters the charter of that colony, nor to the officers who, instead of upholding that charter, aim to undermine it." Therefore, the governor and lieutenant governor were to be considered absent, and their positions were vacant. To prevent the serious problems caused by a complete halt in government, "especially when General Gage had actually declared war and was engaging in hostilities against his majesty's peaceful and loyal subjects in that colony," it was "recommended to the convention to send letters to the residents of the various places entitled to representation in the assembly, asking them to choose representatives; and that this assembly or council carry out the powers of government until a governor appointed by his majesty agrees to govern the colony, according to its charter."[248]

These resolutions were quickly followed by others of greater vigour, denoting more decidedly, a determination to prepare for the last resort of nations.

These resolutions were soon followed by others that were more assertive, clearly showing a commitment to prepare for the final option of nations.

It was earnestly recommended to the conventions of all the colonies to provide the means of making gun powder, and to obtain the largest possible supplies of ammunition. Even the non-importation agreement was relaxed in favour of vessels importing these precious materials. The conventions were also urged to arm and discipline the militia; and so to class them, that one-fourth should be minute men. They were also requested to raise several regular corps for the service of the continent; and a general resolution was entered into, authorising any province thinking itself in danger, to raise a body of regulars not exceeding one thousand men, to be, paid by the united colonies.

It was strongly recommended to the conventions of all the colonies to set up ways to produce gunpowder and to gather as much ammunition as possible. Even the non-importation agreement was eased to allow ships bringing in these important materials. The conventions were also encouraged to train and equip the militia and to organize them so that one-fourth would be minute men. They were also asked to form several regular units for the continent's service, and a general resolution was passed, allowing any province that felt threatened to raise a regular force not exceeding one thousand men, to be funded by the united colonies.

Congress also proceeded to organise the higher departments of the army, of which, colonel George Washington of Virginia was appointed commander in chief.[249]

Congress also went ahead to organize the higher departments of the army, appointing Colonel George Washington of Virginia as the commander in chief.[249]

Bills of credit to the amount of three millions of dollars were emitted for the purpose of defraying the expenses of the war, and the faith of the twelve confederated colonies was pledged for their redemption. Articles of war for the government of the continental army were formed; though the troops were raised under the authority of the respective colonies, without even a requisition from congress, except in a few instances. Manifesto of congress.A solemn dignified declaration, in form of a manifesto, was prepared, to be published to the army in orders, and to the people from the pulpit. After detailing the causes of their opposition to the mother country, with all the energy of men feeling the injuries of which they complain, the manifesto exclaims, "but why should we enumerate our injuries in detail? By one statute, it is declared that parliament can, of right, make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever! What is to defend us against so enormous, so unlimited a power? Not a single man of those who assume it, is chosen by us, or is subject to our control or influence: but, on the contrary, they are, all of them, exempt from the operation of such laws; and an American revenue, if not diverted from the ostensible purposes for which it is raised, would actually lighten their own burdens in proportion as they increase ours. We saw the misery to which such despotism would reduce us. We, for ten years, incessantly and ineffectually, besieged the throne as supplicants; we reasoned, we remonstrated with parliament in the most mild and decent language."

Bills of credit totaling three million dollars were issued to cover the costs of the war, and the commitment of the twelve united colonies was promised for their repayment. Rules of engagement for managing the continental army were established, even though the troops were recruited under the authority of the individual colonies, without much of a request from Congress, except in a few cases. Congress manifesto.A serious and formal declaration, in the form of a manifesto, was created to be announced to the army through orders and to the public from the pulpit. After explaining the reasons for their opposition to the mother country, with all the passion of people who feel the injustices they are facing, the manifesto declares, "but why should we list our grievances in detail? By one law, it is stated that Parliament can, by right, make laws to bind us in all cases whatsoever! What can protect us against such an enormous, such an unlimited power? Not a single person among those who claim this power is chosen by us, nor are they under our control or influence: rather, they are all exempt from the enforcement of such laws; and an American revenue, if not diverted from the intended purposes for which it is raised, would actually reduce their burdens as it increases ours. We recognized the misery that such tyranny would bring upon us. For ten years, we persistently and unsuccessfully approached the throne as beggars; we reasoned, we protested with Parliament in the most respectful and decent manner."

The manifesto next enumerates the measures adopted by administration to enforce the claims of Great Britain, and then adds,—"we are reduced to the alternative of choosing an unconstitutional submission to the tyranny of irritated ministers, or resistance by force.—The latter is our choice. We have counted the cost of this contest, and find nothing so dreadful as voluntary slavery. Honour, justice, and humanity, forbid us tamely to surrender that freedom which we received from our gallant ancestors, and which our innocent posterity have a right to receive from us. We cannot endure the infamy and guilt of resigning succeeding generations to that wretchedness which inevitably awaits them, if we basely entail hereditary bondage upon them.

The manifesto then lists the actions taken by the government to back Britain’s claims and adds, “We are left with the choice of unconstitutionally submitting to the oppressive actions of angry ministers or resisting with force. We choose the latter. We have weighed the costs of this struggle, and there’s nothing worse than choosing slavery. Honor, justice, and humanity refuse to let us surrender the freedom we inherited from our brave ancestors, which our innocent future generations have the right to inherit from us. We cannot bear the shame and guilt of condemning future generations to the misery that will inevitably come if we cowardly impose hereditary bondage on them.”

"Our cause is just. Our union is perfect. Our internal resources are great; and, if necessary, foreign assistance is undoubtedly attainable. We gratefully acknowledge, as signal instances of the divine favour towards us, that his providence would not permit us to be called into this severe controversy, until we were grown up to our present strength, had been previously exercised in warlike operation, and possessed of the means of defending ourselves. With hearts fortified with these animating reflections, we most solemnly, before God and the world, DECLARE that, exerting the utmost energy of those powers which our beneficent creator hath graciously bestowed upon us, the arms we have been compelled by our enemies to assume, we will, in defiance of every hazard, with unabating firmness and perseverance, employ for the preservation of our liberties; being with one mind resolved to die freemen, rather than to live slaves.

"Our cause is right. Our union is strong. Our resources are plenty; and, if needed, foreign support is definitely available. We gratefully acknowledge, as clear signs of divine favor towards us, that Providence didn't allow us to enter this intense struggle until we had matured into our current strength, had gained experience in warfare, and had the means to defend ourselves. With hearts strengthened by these encouraging thoughts, we solemnly, before God and the world, DECLARE that, using the full power that our generous creator has graciously given us, the weapons we have been forced to take up against our enemies, we will, no matter the risks, with unwavering determination and perseverance, use for the preservation of our freedoms; united in our resolve to die as free people, rather than live as slaves."

"Lest this declaration should disquiet the minds of our friends and fellow subjects in any part of the empire, we assure them that we mean not to dissolve that union which has so long and so happily subsisted between us, and which we sincerely wish to see restored. Necessity has not yet driven us to that desperate measure, or induced us to excite any other nation to war against them. We have not raised armies with ambitious designs of separating from Great Britain, and establishing independent states. We fight not for glory, or for conquest. We exhibit to mankind the remarkable spectacle of a people attacked by unprovoked enemies, without any imputation or even suspicion of offence. They boast of their privileges and civilization, and yet proffer no milder conditions than servitude or death.

"Lest this statement cause worry for our friends and fellow citizens throughout the empire, we assure them that we do not intend to break the union that has existed between us for so long and has brought us happiness, and we genuinely hope to see it restored. Necessity has not yet forced us into such a drastic step or led us to provoke any other nation to fight against them. We have not assembled armies with the ambitious goal of breaking away from Great Britain and creating independent states. We are not fighting for glory or for conquest. We present to the world the striking image of a people being attacked by unprovoked enemies, with no accusations or even hint of wrongdoing. They boast about their rights and civilization, yet offer no better options than servitude or death."

"In our own native land in defence of the freedom that is our birth right, and which we ever enjoyed until the late violation of it, for the protection of our property, acquired solely by the honest industry of our forefathers, and ourselves, against violence actually offered, we have taken up arms. We shall lay them down when hostilities shall cease on the part of the aggressors, and all danger of their being renewed shall be removed, and not before."

"In our own homeland, we are standing up for the freedom that is our birthright and that we've enjoyed until it was recently violated. We're defending our property, which we've earned through the hard work of our ancestors and ourselves, against the violence that’s being threatened. We have taken up arms. We will put them down when the aggressors stop their attacks and there is no longer any threat of them starting again, and not before."

Some intelligence respecting the movements of the British army having excited a suspicion that general Gage intended to penetrate into the country, the provincial congress recommended it to the council of war to take measures for the defence of Dorchester neck, and to occupy Bunker's hill, a commanding piece of ground just within the peninsula on which Charlestown stands. In observance of these instructions, a detachment of one thousand men, commanded by colonel Prescott, was ordered to take possession of this ground; but, by some mistake, Breed's hill, situate nearer to Boston, was marked out, instead of Bunker's hill, for the proposed intrenchments.

Some information about the movements of the British army raised suspicions that General Gage planned to move into the area, so the provincial congress advised the council of war to take steps to defend Dorchester Neck and to occupy Bunker’s Hill, an important area on the peninsula where Charlestown is located. Following these instructions, a group of one thousand men, led by Colonel Prescott, was ordered to secure this location; however, due to a mistake, Breed's Hill, which is closer to Boston, was designated instead of Bunker’s Hill for the planned fortifications.

The party sent on this service worked with so much diligence and secrecy that, by the dawn of day, they had thrown up a small square redoubt, without alarming some ships of war which lay in the river at no great distance. As soon as the returning light discovered this work to the ships, a heavy cannonade was commenced upon it, which the provincials sustained with firmness. They continued to labour until they had thrown up a small breast work stretching from the east side of the redoubt to the bottom of the hill, so as to extend considerably their line of defence.

The party assigned to this task worked with such hard work and secrecy that, by dawn, they had built a small square fort without alerting some warships that were anchored nearby in the river. Once the morning light revealed the fort to the ships, heavy cannon fire began to target it, which the provincial forces endured with courage. They kept working until they had constructed a small barrier stretching from the east side of the fort to the base of the hill, significantly extending their defensive line.

As this eminence overlooked Boston, general Gage determined to drive the provincials from it; and for this purpose, detached major general Howe, and brigadier general Pigot, at the head of ten companies of grenadiers, and the same number of light infantry with a proper proportion of field artillery. These troops landed at Moreton's point; but, perceiving that the Americans waited for them with firmness, they remained on their ground until the arrival of a reinforcement from Boston, for which general Howe had applied. During this interval, the Americans also were reinforced by a detachment under the command of generals Warren and Pommeroy; and they availed themselves of this delay to strengthen their defences with some adjoining posts and rails which they pulled up and arranged in two parallel lines at a small distance from each other; rilling the space between with hay, so as to form a complete cover from the musketry of the assailants.

As this high point overlooked Boston, General Gage decided to force the colonists out of it. To do this, he sent Major General Howe and Brigadier General Pigot, leading ten companies of grenadiers and the same number of light infantry, along with an appropriate amount of field artillery. These troops landed at Moreton's Point; however, seeing that the Americans stood firm, they stayed put until a reinforcement from Boston arrived, which General Howe had requested. During this time, the Americans were also reinforced by a unit led by Generals Warren and Pommeroy, and they took advantage of the delay to improve their defenses by gathering nearby materials and laying them out in two parallel lines a short distance apart, filling the space between with hay to provide complete cover from the attackers' gunfire.

The British troops, on being joined by their second detachment, advanced slowly, in two lines, under cover of a heavy discharge of cannon and howitzers, frequently halting in order to allow their artillery time to demolish the works. While they were advancing, orders were given to set fire to Charlestown, a handsome village, which flanked their line of march, and which was soon consumed.

The British troops, joined by their second detachment, moved forward slowly in two lines, shielded by a heavy barrage of cannons and howitzers, often stopping to let their artillery take out the defenses. As they advanced, orders were issued to set fire to Charlestown, a pretty village that was along their route, and it was quickly destroyed.

It is not easy to conceive a spectacle more grand and more awful than was now exhibited, nor a moment of more anxious expectation. The scene of action was in full view of the heights of Boston and of its neighbourhood, which were covered with spectators taking deep and opposite interests in the events passing before them. The soldiers of the hostile armies not on duty, the citizens of Boston, and the inhabitants of the adjacent country; all feeling emotions which set description at defiance, were witnesses of the majestic and tremendous scene.

It’s hard to imagine a more impressive and daunting spectacle than what was happening now, nor a moment filled with such anxious anticipation. The action was clearly visible from the heights of Boston and its surroundings, which were packed with spectators deeply invested in the unfolding events. The soldiers from both opposing armies who weren’t on duty, the citizens of Boston, and the residents of the nearby areas—all experiencing emotions that defy description—watched the magnificent and overwhelming scene.

Battle of Breed's hill.

The provincials permitted the English to approach unmolested, within less than one hundred yards of the works, and then poured in upon them so deadly a fire that their line was broken, and they fell back with precipitation towards the landing place. By the great exertions of their officers, they were rallied and brought up to the charge; but were again driven back in confusion by the heavy and incessant fire from the works. General Howe is said to have been left, at one time, almost alone; and it is certain that few officers about his person escaped unhurt.

The locals allowed the English to come closer, within less than a hundred yards of their defenses, and then unleashed such a devastating fire that their line collapsed, forcing them to retreat quickly back to the landing area. With great efforts from their officers, they regrouped and charged again; but they were once more pushed back in chaos by the intense and continuous fire from the defenses. At one point, General Howe was reportedly left nearly alone; and it's clear that very few officers around him emerged uninjured.

The impression to be made by victory or defeat in this early stage of the war, was deemed so important that extraordinary exertions were used once more to rally the English. With difficulty, they were led a third time to the works. The redoubt was attacked on three sides, while some pieces of artillery raked the breast work from end to end. At the same time, a cross fire from the ships, and floating batteries lying on both sides of the isthmus by which the peninsula is connected with the continent, not only annoyed the works on Breed's hill, but deterred any considerable reinforcements from entering the peninsula. The ammunition of the Americans being nearly exhausted, they were no longer able to keep up the same incessant stream of fire which had twice repulsed the assailants; and the redoubt, which the English mounted with ease, was carried at the point of the bayonet. Yet the Americans, many of whom were without bayonets, are said to have maintained the contest with clubbed muskets, until the redoubt was half filled with the King's troops.

The impression made by winning or losing in this early stage of the war was considered so crucial that extraordinary efforts were made once again to rally the English. With great difficulty, they were led a third time to the fortifications. The redoubt was attacked on three sides, while some artillery targeted the defensive works from end to end. At the same time, a crossfire from the ships and floating batteries positioned on both sides of the isthmus connecting the peninsula to the mainland not only disrupted the works on Breed's Hill but also prevented any significant reinforcements from reaching the peninsula. With the Americans' ammunition nearly depleted, they could no longer maintain the same relentless barrage that had twice driven back the attackers; thus, the redoubt, which the English easily ascended, was taken at bayonet point. However, the Americans, many of whom lacked bayonets, are said to have continued the fight with muskets used as clubs until the redoubt was half filled with the King's troops.

The redoubt being lost, the breast work was abandoned; and the hazardous movement was accomplished, of retreating in the face of a victorious enemy over Charlestown neck; exposed to the same cross fire, which had deterred the reinforcements from coming to their assistance.

The fort was lost, so the barricade was left behind; and the risky move of retreating in front of a winning enemy over Charlestown Neck was carried out, exposed to the same crossfire that had prevented the reinforcements from coming to help them.

The detachment employed on this enterprise consisted of about three thousand men, composing the flower of the British army; and high encomiums were bestowed on the resolution they displayed. According to the returns, their killed and wounded amounted to one thousand and fifty four,—an immense proportion of the number engaged in the action. Notwithstanding the danger of the retreat over Charlestown neck, the loss of the Americans was stated at only four hundred and fifty men. Among the killed was Doctor Warren, a gentleman greatly beloved and regretted, who fell just after the provincials began their retreat from the breast work.

The detachment assigned to this mission consisted of about three thousand men, representing the best of the British army, and they received high praise for their determination. According to the reports, their killed and wounded totaled one thousand and fifty-four—an enormous percentage of those involved in the action. Despite the risks during the retreat over Charlestown neck, the American losses were reported to be only four hundred and fifty men. Among the fallen was Doctor Warren, a highly respected and cherished individual, who died just after the provincial forces began their retreat from the breastwork.

At the time, the colonial force on the peninsula was generally stated at fifteen hundred men. It has been since estimated at four thousand.

At that time, the colonial force on the peninsula was generally reported to be fifteen hundred men. It's now estimated to be around four thousand.

Although the Americans lost the ground, they claimed the victory. Many of the advantages of victory were certainly gained. Their confidence in themselves was greatly increased; and it was asked, universally, how many more such triumphs the invaders of their country could afford?

Although the Americans lost the ground, they declared victory. Many of the benefits of winning were definitely achieved. Their self-confidence was significantly boosted; and it was asked everywhere, how many more such successes could the invaders of their country handle?

The British army had been treated too roughly, to attempt farther offensive operations. They contented themselves with seizing and fortifying Bunker's hill, which secured the peninsula of Charlestown; in which, however, they remained as closely blockaded as in that of Boston.

The British army had been treated too harshly to launch any further offensive operations. They settled for taking and reinforcing Bunker Hill, which secured the Charlestown peninsula; however, they remained just as tightly blockaded there as they were in Boston.

The Americans were much elated by the intrepidity the raw troops had displayed, and the execution they had done, in this engagement. They fondly cherished the belief that courage, and dexterity in the use of fire arms, would bestow advantages amply compensating the want of discipline. Unfortunately for the colonies, this course of thinking was not confined to the mass of the people. It seems to have extended to those who guided the public councils, and to have contributed to the adoption of a system, which, more than once, brought their cause to the brink of ruin. They did not distinguish sufficiently between the momentary efforts of a few brave men, brought together by a high sense of the injuries which threatened their country, and carried into action under the influence of keen resentments; and those steady persevering exertions under continued suffering, which must be necessary to bring an important war to a happy termination. Nor did they examine with sufficient accuracy, several striking circumstances attending the battle which had been fought. It is not easy to read the accounts given of the action without being persuaded, that, had the Americans on Breed's hill been supplied with ammunition, and been properly supported; had the reinforcements ordered to their assistance entered the peninsula, as soldiers in habits of obedience would have done, and there displayed the heroic courage which was exhibited by their countrymen engaged in defence of the works; the assailants must have been defeated, and the flower of the British army cut to pieces. It ought also to have been remarked that, while the few who were endowed with more than a common portion of bravery, encountered the danger of executing the orders they had received, the many were deterred by the magnitude of that danger. But it is not by the few that great victories are to be gained, or a country to be saved.

The Americans were very excited by the bravery the inexperienced troops had shown and the results they achieved in this battle. They eagerly believed that courage and skill with firearms would provide enough advantages to make up for their lack of discipline. Unfortunately for the colonies, this way of thinking wasn't limited to just the general public. It seemed to extend to those in charge of public decisions, contributing to a strategy that, more than once, brought their cause close to disaster. They failed to properly differentiate between the temporary efforts of a few brave individuals, motivated by a strong sense of the threats facing their country and driven by intense emotions, and the steady, persistent efforts required to successfully end a significant war. They also didn't closely examine several notable details surrounding the battle that had taken place. It’s hard to read the accounts of the battle without being convinced that if the Americans on Breed's Hill had been given enough ammunition and proper support; if the reinforcements ordered to help them had entered the peninsula as disciplined soldiers should have, and displayed the same heroic courage as their fellow countrymen defending the fortifications; the attackers would have been defeated, and the best of the British army would have been destroyed. It's also important to note that while a few individuals displayed notable bravery in facing the danger of carrying out their orders, many were held back by the scale of that danger. But it's not just the few who win great victories or save a country.

Amidst these hostile operations, the voice of peace was yet heard. Allegiance to the King was still acknowledged; and a lingering hope remained that an accommodation was not impossible. Congress voted a petition to his majesty, replete with professions of duty and attachment; and addressed a letter to the people of England, conjuring them by the endearing appellations of "friends, countrymen, and brethren," to prevent the dissolution of "that connexion which the remembrance of former friendships, pride in the glorious achievements of common ancestors, and affection for the heirs of their virtues, had heretofore maintained." They uniformly disclaimed any idea of independence, and professed themselves to consider union with England on constitutional principles, as the greatest blessing which could be bestowed on them.

Amidst these hostile operations, the call for peace was still heard. Loyalty to the King was still recognized, and there was a lingering hope that a resolution was possible. Congress voted to send a petition to his majesty, full of expressions of duty and loyalty, and wrote a letter to the people of England, urging them with affectionate terms like "friends, countrymen, and brothers," to help prevent the end of "the connection that the memories of past friendships, pride in the remarkable achievements of our shared ancestors, and love for the heirs of their virtues had previously upheld." They consistently rejected any notion of independence and claimed to see union with England on constitutional grounds as the greatest blessing they could receive.

But Britain had determined to maintain, by force, the legislative supremacy of parliament; and America was equally determined, by force, to repel the claim.

But Britain was set on using force to uphold the legislative supremacy of parliament; and America was equally determined, by force, to reject that claim.


NOTES.

NOTE—No. I.—See Page 195.

The annals of Massachusetts, for this period, exhibit one of those wonderful cases of popular delusion, which infecting every class of society, and gaining strength from its very extravagance; triumphing over human reason, and cruelly sporting with human life; reveal to man his deplorable imbecility, and would teach him, if the experience of others could teach, never to countenance a departure from that moderation, and those safe and sure principles of moral rectitude which have stood the test of time, and have received the approbation of the wise and good in all ages. A very detailed and interesting account of the humiliating and affecting events here alluded to has been given by Mr. Hutchinson, but is too long to be inserted entire in this work; they were, however, of too much magnitude while passing, to be entirely unnoticed even at this day.

The history of Massachusetts during this time shows a remarkable instance of collective delusion, which affected every social class and gained strength from its very absurdity; it triumphed over human reason and cruelly played with human life. This reveals humanity's unfortunate foolishness and should, if the experiences of others could teach, remind us never to abandon moderation and the safe, solid principles of moral integrity that have withstood the test of time and have been endorsed by the wise and good throughout history. A detailed and engaging account of the humiliating and emotional events mentioned here has been provided by Mr. Hutchinson, but it is too lengthy to include in full in this work; however, they were significant enough during their time to not be completely overlooked even today.

In Great Britain, as well as in America, the opinion had long prevailed that, by the aid of malignant spirits, certain persons possessed supernatural powers, which were usually exercised in the mischievous employment of tormenting others; and the criminal code of both countries was disgraced with laws for the punishment of witchcraft. With considerable intervals between them, some few instances had occurred in New England of putting this sanguinary law in force; but in the year 1692, this weakness was converted into frenzy; and after exercising successfully its destructive rage on those miserable objects whose wayward dispositions had excited the ill opinion, or whose age and wretchedness ought to have secured them the pity of their neighbours, its baneful activity was extended to persons in every situation of life, and many of the most reputable members of society became its victims.

In Great Britain, as well as in America, there had long been a belief that certain individuals, with the help of evil spirits, had supernatural abilities that they typically used to harm others. As a result, the criminal laws in both countries included punishments for witchcraft. There were a few instances in New England where this harsh law was enforced, but in 1692, this belief turned into madness. It successfully unleashed its destructive power on those unfortunate souls whose strange behaviors had drawn negative attention or whose age and misfortune should have earned them the compassion of their neighbors. Its harmful actions broadened to include people from all walks of life, and many respected members of society became its victims.

The first scene of this distressing tragedy was laid in Salem. The public mind had been prepared for its exhibition by some publications, stating the evidence adduced in former trials for witchcraft both in Old and New England, in which full proof was supposed to have been given of the guilt of the accused. Soon after this, some young girls in Boston had accustomed themselves to fall into fits, and had affected to be struck dead on the production of certain popular books, such as the assembly's catechism, and Cotton's milk for babes, while they could read Oxford's jests, or popish and quaker books, with many others, which were deemed profane, without being in any manner affected by them. These pretences, instead of exposing the fraud to instant detection, seem to have promoted the cheat; and they were supposed to be possessed by demons who were utterly confounded at the production of those holy books. "Sometimes," says Mr. Hutchinson, "they were deaf, then dumb, then blind; and sometimes, all these disorders together would come upon them. Their tongues would be drawn down their throats, then pulled out upon their chins. Their jaws, necks, shoulders, elbows, and all their joints would appear to be dislocated, and they would make most piteous outcries of burnings, of being cut with knives, beat, &c. and the marks of wounds were afterwards to be seen." At length an old Irish woman, not of good character, who had given one of those girls some harsh language, and to whom all this diabolical mischief was attributed, was apprehended by the magistracy; and neither confessing nor denying the fact, was, on the certificate of physicians that she was compos mentis, condemned and executed.

The first scene of this troubling tragedy takes place in Salem. The public was primed for its display by some publications that outlined the evidence gathered in earlier witchcraft trials in both Old and New England, which supposedly proved the guilt of those accused. Shortly after this, some young girls in Boston began to have fits and pretended to be struck down by certain popular books, like the assembly's catechism and Cotton's milk for babes, while they could read Oxford's jokes or books by Catholics and Quakers, among others deemed offensive, without any reaction. Instead of exposing the scam, these acts seemed to encourage it, and it was believed they were possessed by demons that were thrown into confusion by the presence of those holy books. “Sometimes,” says Mr. Hutchinson, “they would be deaf, then mute, then blind; and sometimes all these conditions would hit them at once. Their tongues would be pulled down their throats and then out onto their chins. Their jaws, necks, shoulders, elbows, and all their joints would look dislocated, and they would cry out pitifully about burning, being cut with knives, beaten, etc., and later, marks of wounds could be seen.” Eventually, an old Irish woman of questionable reputation, who had offended one of the girls and to whom all this evil was blamed, was arrested by the authorities; and after neither confessing nor denying the charge, she was condemned and executed based on a doctors' certificate that she was compos mentis.

Sir William Phipps, the governor, on his arrival from England, brought with him opinions which could not fail to strengthen the popular prejudice, and the lieutenant governor supported one which was well calculated to render it sanguinary. He maintained that though the devil might appear in the shape of a guilty person, he could never be permitted to assume that of an innocent one. Consequently, when those who affected to perceive the form which tormented them designated any particular person as guilty, the guilt of that person was established, because he could not, if innocent, be personated by an evil spirit.

Sir William Phipps, the governor, arrived from England with opinions that definitely fueled the public’s existing biases, and the lieutenant governor backed a view that was likely to make things worse. He argued that while the devil could take on the form of someone guilty, he could never take on the form of someone innocent. As a result, when those claiming to see the tormenting figure pointed to someone as guilty, that person was considered guilty because an evil spirit couldn’t impersonate an innocent person.

The public mind being thus predisposed, four girls in Salem complained of being afflicted in the same manner with those in Boston. The physicians, unable to account for the disorder, attributed it to witchcraft, and an old Indian woman in the neighbourhood was selected as the witch. The attention bestowed on these girls gave them great importance; and not only confirmed them in the imposture, but produced other competitors who were ambitious of the same distinction. Several other persons were now bewitched; and not only the old Indian, but two other old women, the one bedridden, and the other subject to melancholy and distraction, were accused as witches. It was necessary to keep up the agitation already excited, by furnishing fresh subjects for astonishment; and in a short time, the accusations extended to persons who were in respectable situations. The manner in which these accusations were received, evidenced such a degree of public credulity, that the impostors seem to have been convinced of their power to assail with impunity, all whom caprice or malignity might select for their victims. Such was the prevailing infatuation, that in one instance, a child of five years old was charged as an accomplice in these pretended crimes; and if the nearest relatives of the accused manifested either tenderness for their situation, or resentment at the injury done their friends, they drew upon themselves the vengeance of these profligate impostors, and were involved in the dangers from which they were desirous of rescuing those with whom they were most intimately connected. For going out of church when allusions were made from the pulpit to a person of fair fame, a sister was charged as a witch; and for accompanying on her examination a wife who had been apprehended, the husband was involved in the same prosecution, and was condemned and executed. In the presence of the magistrates these flagitious accusers affected extreme agony, and attributed to those whom they accused, the power of torturing them by a look. The examinations were all taken in writing, and several of them are detailed at full length in Mr. Hutchinson's history of Massachusetts. They exhibit a deplorable degree of blind infatuation on one side, and of atrocious profligacy on the other, which if not well attested, could scarcely be supposed to have existed.

The public was already on edge when four girls in Salem began saying they were suffering like those in Boston. The doctors, unable to explain the condition, blamed it on witchcraft, and an elderly Native American woman living nearby was singled out as the witch. The attention these girls received made them feel important, which not only reinforced their deceit but also attracted others eager for the same recognition. Soon, several other people claimed to be bewitched, leading to accusations against the elderly Indian woman and two other old women—one bedridden and the other struggling with depression. To maintain the growing excitement, new claims were made, and the accusations soon spread to respected members of the community. The way these claims were treated showed a shocking level of public gullibility, convincing the frauds they could target anyone they wanted without consequences. The madness was so extreme that even a five-year-old child was accused of being involved in these fake crimes. If the relatives of the accused showed any care for their loved ones or anger toward the harm inflicted, they found themselves facing the wrath of the deceitful girls, putting them at risk too. For leaving church when someone reputable was mentioned, a sister was accused of witchcraft; and when a husband supported his wife during her questioning, he got swept up in the same allegations and was condemned and executed. In front of the magistrates, these deceitful accusers pretended to be in extreme agony, claiming their accusers had the power to torture them with just a glance. All examinations were recorded in writing, and many are recounted in detail in Mr. Hutchinson's history of Massachusetts. They reveal a tragic level of blind ignorance on one side and shocking deceit on the other that, if it weren’t so well-documented, would be hard to believe.

Many persons of sober lives, and unblemished characters, were committed to prison; and the public prejudices had already pronounced their doom. Against charges of this nature, thus conducted, no defence could possibly be made. To be accused was to be found guilty. The very grossness of the imposition seemed to secure its success, and the absurdity of the accusation to establish the verity of the charge.

Many decent people with good reputations were thrown in jail, and public opinion had already decided their fate. There was no way to defend against such serious charges. Being accused meant being guilty. The blatant nature of the deception seemed to ensure its success, and the ridiculousness of the accusation only made the charges seem more believable.

The consternation became almost universal. It was soon perceived that all attempts to establish innocence must be ineffectual; and the person accused could only hope to obtain safety, by confessing the truth of the charge, and criminating others. The extent of crime introduced by such a state of things almost surpasses belief. Every feeling of humanity is shocked when we learn that to save themselves, children accused their parents; in some instances, parents their children; and in one case, sentence of death was pronounced against a husband on the testimony of his wife.

The shock was almost universal. It quickly became clear that any efforts to prove innocence would be pointless; the person accused could only hope to secure their safety by admitting to the charge and implicating others. The level of wrongdoing resulting from this situation is almost unbelievable. Every sense of humanity is disturbed when we find out that, to save themselves, children turned in their parents; in some cases, parents turned in their children; and in one instance, a husband was sentenced to death based on the testimony of his wife.

There were examples of persons who under the terrors of examination confessed themselves guilty, and accused others; but unable afterwards to support the reproaches of conscience, retracted their confessions under the persuasion that death would be the consequence of doing so.

There were instances of people who, under the pressure of interrogation, admitted their guilt and implicated others; but later, unable to bear the guilt of their conscience, they withdrew their confessions, believing that doing so would lead to their death.

During this reign of popular frenzy, the bounds of probability were so far transcended, that we scarcely know how to give credit to the well attested fact, that among those who were permitted to save themselves by confessing that they were witches, and joining in the accusation of their parents, were to be found children from seven to ten years of age! Among the numbers who were accused, only one person was acquitted. For this he was indebted to one of the girls who would not join the others in criminating him.

During this time of widespread hysteria, the limits of what seemed possible were pushed so far that it’s hard to believe the well-documented fact that among those who managed to escape by admitting they were witches and accusing their own parents were children as young as seven to ten years old! Out of all the people who were accused, only one person was found not guilty. He owed this to one of the girls who refused to join the others in blaming him.

The examination had commenced in February, and the list of commitments had swelled to a lamentable bulk by June, when the new charter having arrived, commissioners of oyer and terminer were appointed for the trial of persons charged with witchcraft. By this court, a considerable number were condemned, of whom nineteen, protesting their innocence, were executed. It is observed by Mr. Hutchinson, that those who were condemned and not executed had most probably saved themselves by a confession of their guilt.

The examination started in February, and by June, the list of commitments had grown to an unfortunate size. When the new charter arrived, commissioners for oyer and terminer were appointed to handle the trials of people accused of witchcraft. This court condemned a significant number, with nineteen of them, who maintained their innocence, being executed. Mr. Hutchinson notes that those who were condemned but not executed likely saved themselves by confessing their guilt.

Fortunately for those who were still to be tried, the legislature, convened under the new charter, created a regular tribunal for the trial of criminal as well as civil cases, and the court of commissioners rose to sit no more. The first session of the regular court for the trial of criminal cases was to be held in January, and this delay was favourable to reflection and to the recovery of the public reason. Other causes contributed to this event. There remained yet in the various prisons of the colony, a vast number of women, many of whom were of the most reputable families in the towns in which they had resided. Allusion had been made to many others of the first rank, and some had been expressly named by the bewitched and confessing witches. A Mr. Bradstreet, who had been appointed one of the council, and was son to the old governor of that name; but who as a justice of the peace was suspected of not prosecuting with sufficient rigour, was named by the witnesses as a confederate, and found it necessary to abscond. The governor's lady it is said, and the wife of one of the ministers who had favoured this persecution, were among the accused; and a charge was also brought against the secretary of the colony of Connecticut.

Fortunately for those still awaiting trial, the legislature, meeting under the new charter, established a regular court for both criminal and civil cases, and the court of commissioners ceased to function. The first session of the regular court for criminal trials was set for January, and this delay allowed time for reflection and for the public to regain its reason. Other factors contributed to this situation. There were still many women in the various prisons of the colony, many from reputable families in the towns they lived in. Numerous others of high social standing had been mentioned, and some had been specifically named by the bewitched and confessing witches. A Mr. Bradstreet, who had been appointed to the council and was the son of the former governor of that name, was seen as a confederate because he, as a justice of the peace, was suspected of not pursuing cases with enough rigor and found it necessary to flee. It is said that the governor's wife and the wife of one of the ministers who supported this persecution were among the accused, and a charge was also brought against the secretary of the colony of Connecticut.

Although the violence of the torrent of prejudice was beginning to abate, yet the grand jury in January, found a true bill against fifty persons, but of those brought to trial, only three were condemned, and they were not executed. All those who were not tried in January, were discharged by order of the governor, "and never," says Mr. Hutchinson, "has such a jail delivery been known in New England. And never was there given a more melancholy proof of the degree of depravity of which man is capable when the public passions countenance crime."

Although the intensity of the wave of prejudice was starting to lessen, the grand jury in January found enough evidence against fifty people to proceed. However, of those who were put on trial, only three were convicted, and they were not executed. Those who weren't tried in January were released by the governor's order, "and never," says Mr. Hutchinson, "has there been such a release from jail in New England. And never has there been a more sorrowful demonstration of the level of wrongdoing that humans are capable of when public emotions support crime."


NOTE—No. II.—See Page 291.

The PLAN of the Union was as follows, viz.

The plan for the Union was as follows:

"It is proposed that humble application be made for an act of parliament of Great Britain, by virtue of which one general government may be formed in America, including all the said colonies: [Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina] within and under which government, each colony may retain its present constitution, except in the particulars wherein a change may be directed by the said act, as hereafter follows:

"It is suggested that a humble request be made for an act of Parliament of Great Britain, allowing for the establishment of a single government in America that would include all the mentioned colonies: [Massachusetts Bay, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina]. Under this government, each colony can maintain its current constitution, except for the specific changes that may be mandated by the act, as outlined below:

PRESIDENT GENERAL AND GRAND COUNCIL.

PRESIDENT, GENERAL, AND GRAND COUNCIL.

That the said general government be administered by a president general, to be appointed and supported by the crown, and a grand council, to be chosen by the representatives of the people of the several colonies, met in their assemblies.

That the general government will be run by a chief president, who will be appointed and backed by the crown, along with a grand council, selected by the representatives of the people from the various colonies, gathered in their assemblies.

ELECTION OF MEMBERS.

MEMBER ELECTION.

That within — months after passing such act, the houses of representatives that happen to be sitting within that time, or that shall be especially for that purpose convened, may and shall choose members for the grand council in the following proportion, that is to say:

That within — months after passing such act, the houses of representatives that are meeting during that time, or that are specifically called for that purpose, may and shall select members for the grand council in the following proportion, that is to say:

Massachusetts Bay7
New Hampshire2
Connecticut5
Rhode Island2
New York4
New Jersey3
Pennsylvania6
Maryland4
Virginia7
North Carolina4
South Carolina4
 ---
 48

PLACE OF FIRST MEETING.

Meeting Location.

Who shall meet for the first time at the city of Philadelphia, in Pennsylvania, being called by the president general as soon as conveniently may be after his appointment.

Who will meet for the first time in the city of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, as called by the president general as soon as it can be arranged after his appointment.

NEW ELECTION.

New election.

That there shall be a new election of the members of the grand council every three years; and on the death or resignation of any member, his place shall be supplied by a new choice, at the next sitting of the assembly of the colony he represented.

That there will be a new election for the members of the grand council every three years; and if any member dies or resigns, their position will be filled by a new selection at the next meeting of the assembly of the colony they represented.

PROPORTION OF THE MEMBERS AFTER THE FIRST THREE YEARS.

PROPORTION OF THE MEMBERS AFTER THE FIRST THREE YEARS.

That after the first three years, when the proportion of money arising out of each colony to the general treasury can be known, the number of members to be chosen for each colony shall, from time to time, in all ensuing elections, be regulated by that proportion (yet so as that the number to be chosen by any one province be not more than seven, nor less than two).

That after the first three years, when we can determine how much money each colony contributes to the general treasury, the number of members elected from each colony will be adjusted accordingly in all future elections (but no colony can have more than seven members or fewer than two).

MEETINGS OF THE GRAND COUNCIL AND CALL.

MEETINGS OF THE GRAND COUNCIL AND CALL.

That the grand council shall meet once in every year, and oftener, if occasion require, at such time and place as they shall adjourn to at the last preceding meeting, or as they shall be called to meet at by the president general, on any emergency; he having first obtained in writing the consent of seven of the members to such call, and sent due and timely notice to the whole.

That the grand council will meet once a year, and more often if needed, at the time and place they agreed on during the last meeting, or as called by the president general in case of an emergency; the president must first get written consent from seven members for such a call and provide proper and timely notice to everyone.

CONTINUANCE.

Continuation.

That the grand council have power to choose their speaker: and shall neither be dissolved, prorogued, nor continued sitting longer than six weeks at one time; without their own consent, or the special command of the crown.

That the grand council has the power to choose its speaker; and it shall neither be dissolved, postponed, nor continue sitting for more than six weeks at a time without their own consent or a special order from the crown.

MEMBERS ATTENDANCE.

Attendance of Members.

That the members of the grand council shall be allowed for their services, ten shillings sterling per diem, during their session and journey to and from the place of meeting; twenty miles to be reckoned a day's journey.

That the members of the grand council will be paid ten shillings sterling per day for their services during their session and for travel to and from the meeting place; twenty miles will be considered a day's travel.

ASSENT OF PRESIDENT GENERAL AND HIS DUTY.

ASSENT OF PRESIDENT GENERAL AND HIS DUTY.

That the assent of the president general be requisite to all acts of the grand council; and that it be his office and duty to cause them to be carried into execution.

That the approval of the general president is required for all actions of the grand council; and it is his responsibility to ensure they are carried out.

POWER OF PRESIDENT GENERAL AND GRAND COUNCIL, TREATIES OF PEACE AND WAR.

POWER OF PRESIDENT GENERAL AND GRAND COUNCIL, TREATIES OF PEACE AND WAR.

That the president general, with the advice of the grand council, hold or direct all Indian treaties in which the general interest of the colonies may be concerned; and make peace or declare war with Indian nations.

That the president general, with the guidance of the grand council, should conduct or oversee all Indian treaties that affect the overall interest of the colonies; and should make peace or declare war with Indian nations.

INDIAN TRADE.

Indian Commerce.

That they make such laws as they judge necessary for regulating all Indian trade.

That they create laws they consider necessary for managing all Indian trade.

INDIAN PURCHASES.

INDIAN PURCHASES.

That they make all purchases from the Indians for the crown, of lands not now within the bounds of particular colonies, or that shall not be within their bounds, when some of them are reduced to more convenient dimensions.

That they buy all land from the Indigenous people for the crown, land that is not currently within the borders of specific colonies, or that will not be within their borders when some of them are resized to more manageable dimensions.

NEW SETTLEMENTS.

NEW COMMUNITIES.

That they make new settlements on such purchases by granting lands in the king's name, reserving a quit rent to the crown, for the use of the general treasury.

That they create new settlements from such purchases by granting land in the king’s name, while reserving a quit rent to the crown for the benefit of the general treasury.

LAWS TO GOVERN THEM.

LAWS TO REGULATE THEM.

That they make laws for regulating and governing such new settlements, until the crown shall think fit to form them into particular governments.

That they create laws to manage and govern these new settlements until the crown decides to establish them as specific governments.

RAISE SOLDIERS AND EQUIP VESSELS, &C.

RAISE SOLDIERS AND EQUIP VESSELS, &C.

That they raise and pay soldiers, build forts for the defence of any of the colonies, and equip vessels of force to guard the coasts and protect the trade on the ocean, lakes, or great rivers; but they shall not impress men in any colony, without the consent of the legislature.

That they raise and pay soldiers, build forts to defend any of the colonies, and equip armed vessels to protect the coasts and safeguard trade on the ocean, lakes, or major rivers; but they shall not draft men in any colony without the approval of the legislature.

POWER TO MAKE LAWS, LAY DUTIES, &C.

POWER TO MAKE LAWS, IMPOSE DUTIES, &C.

That for these purposes they have power to make laws, and lay and levy such general duties, imposts, or taxes, as to them shall appear most equal and just, (considering the ability and other circumstances of the inhabitants in the several colonies) and such may be collected with the least inconvenience to the people; rather discouraging luxury, than loading industry with unnecessary burdens.

That for these purposes they have the authority to create laws, and impose and collect general duties, tariffs, or taxes, as they see fit to be the most fair and just (taking into account the abilities and other circumstances of the people in the different colonies) and that these can be collected with minimal inconvenience to the citizens; focusing on discouraging luxury instead of placing unnecessary burdens on hardworking individuals.

GENERAL TREASURER AND PARTICULAR TREASURER.

General Treasurer and Special Treasurer.

That they may appoint a general treasurer and particular treasurer in each government, when necessary; and from time to time may order the sums in the treasuries of each government into the general treasury, or draw on them for special payments, as they find most convenient.

That they can appoint a general treasurer and specific treasurer in each government when needed; and periodically may move funds from the treasuries of each government to the general treasury, or use them for special payments, as they see fit.

MONEY, HOW TO ISSUE.

Money, how to issue it.

Yet no money to issue but by joint orders of the president general and grand council, except where sums have been appropriated to particular purposes, and the president general has been previously empowered by an act to draw for such sums.

Yet no money can be issued except by joint orders of the president general and the grand council, unless specific amounts have been allocated for certain purposes, and the president general has been previously authorized by an act to withdraw those amounts.

ACCOUNTS.

Accounts.

That the general accounts shall be yearly settled, and reported to the several assemblies.

That the general accounts will be settled annually and reported to the various assemblies.

QUORUM.

QUORUM.

That a quorum of the grand council, empowered to act with the president general, do consist of twenty-five members; among whom there shall be one or more from the majority of the colonies.

That a quorum of the grand council, authorized to act with the general president, consists of twenty-five members; among whom there shall be one or more from the majority of the colonies.

LAWS TO BE TRANSMITTED.

LAWS TO BE SENT.

That the laws made by them for the purposes aforesaid, shall not be repugnant, but, as near as may be, agreeable to the laws of England, and shall be transmitted to the king in council, for approbation, as soon as may be after their passing; and if not disapproved within three years after presentation, to remain in force.

That the laws created by them for the purposes mentioned above shall not contradict but, as much as possible, align with the laws of England, and shall be sent to the king in council for approval as soon as possible after they are passed; and if they are not disapproved within three years of being presented, they will remain in effect.

DEATH OF THE PRESIDENT GENERAL.

PRESIDENT GENERAL'S DEATH.

That in case of the death of the president general, the speaker of the grand council for the time being shall succeed, and be vested with the same powers and authorities, to continue until the king's pleasure be known.

That in case the president general dies, the current speaker of the grand council shall take over and have the same powers and authorities, continuing until the king decides what to do.

OFFICERS, HOW APPOINTED.

OFFICERS, HOW THEY'RE APPOINTED.

That all military commission officers, whether for land or sea service, to act under this general constitution, shall be nominated by the president general; but the approbation of the grand council is to be obtained, before they receive their commissions. And all civil officers are to be nominated by the grand council, and to receive the president general's approbation before they officiate.

That all military commission officers, whether for land or sea service, are to operate under this general constitution, shall be nominated by the president general; however, the approval of the grand council must be obtained before they receive their commissions. Additionally, all civil officers are to be nominated by the grand council and must receive the president general's approval before they can take office.

VACANCIES, HOW SUPPLIED.

Job Openings, How Filled.

But in case of vacancy, by death, or removal of any officer, civil or military, under this constitution, the governor of the province in which such vacancy happens, may appoint until the pleasure of the president general and grand council can be known.

But if there’s a vacancy due to the death or removal of any officer, whether civil or military, under this constitution, the governor of the province where the vacancy occurs may appoint someone until the president general and grand council can make a decision.

EACH COLONY MAY DEFEND ITSELF ON EMERGENCY, &C.

EACH COLONY MAY DEFEND ITSELF IN AN EMERGENCY, &C.

That the particular military as well as civil establishments in each colony remain in their present state, the general constitution notwithstanding; and that on sudden emergencies any colony may defend itself, and lay the accounts of expense thence arising before the president general and grand council, who may allow and order payment of the same as far as they judge such accounts reasonable."

That the specific military and civil organizations in each colony stay as they are, regardless of the general constitution; and that in sudden emergencies, any colony can defend itself and present the expenses incurred to the president general and grand council, who can approve and order payment of those expenses as they see fit.

Minot.

Minot.


NOTE—No. III.—See Page 370.

These being the first resolutions of any assembly after the passage of the stamp act, they are inserted.

These are the first resolutions from any assembly after the stamp act was passed, so they are included.

Whereas, The honourable house of commons in England have of late drawn into question how far the general assembly of this colony hath power to enact laws for laying taxes and imposing duties payable by the people of this his majesty's most ancient colony, for settling and ascertaining the same to all future times, the house of Burgesses of the present general assembly have come to the several following resolutions.

Whereas, The esteemed House of Commons in England has recently questioned how much power the general assembly of this colony has to create laws for imposing taxes and duties that the people of this esteemed colony owe. To clarify and define these matters for future reference, the House of Burgesses of the current general assembly has reached the following resolutions.

Resolved, That the first adventurers and settlers of this his majesty's colony and dominion of Virginia, brought with them, and transmitted to their posterity, and all others his majesty's subjects since inhabiting in this his majesty's colony, all the privileges and immunities that have at any time been held, enjoyed, and possessed by the people of Great Britain.

Resolved, That the first explorers and settlers of this king's colony and territory of Virginia brought with them, and passed down to their descendants, as well as to all other subjects of the king living in this colony, all the rights and freedoms that have ever been held, enjoyed, and possessed by the people of Great Britain.

Resolved, That by two royal charters granted by King James I. the colonies aforesaid are declared entitled to all the privileges of denizens, and natural born subjects, to all intents and purposes as if they had been abiding and born within the realm of England.

Resolved, That by two royal charters granted by King James I, the aforementioned colonies are declared entitled to all the privileges of citizens and natural-born subjects, for all intents and purposes as if they had been living and born within the realm of England.

Resolved, That the taxation of the people by themselves, or by persons chosen by themselves, to represent them, who can only know what taxes the people are able to bear, and the easiest mode of raising them, and are equally affected by such taxes themselves, is the distinguished characteristic of British freedom, and without which the ancient constitution cannot subsist.

Resolved, That the taxation of the people either by themselves or by representatives they choose, who understand what taxes the people can handle and the simplest way to collect them, and who are also affected by these taxes, is a defining feature of British freedom, and without it, the ancient constitution cannot survive.

Resolved, That his majesty's liege people of this most ancient colony have uninterruptedly enjoyed the right of being thus governed by their own assembly in the article of their taxes and internal police, and that the same hath never been forfeited nor any other way yielded up, but hath been constantly recognised by the King and people of Great Britain.

Resolved, That the loyal subjects of His Majesty in this very old colony have continuously enjoyed the right to be governed by their own assembly regarding their taxes and local affairs, and that this right has never been given up or otherwise forfeited, but has always been acknowledged by the King and the people of Great Britain.

Resolved, Therefore, that the general assembly of this colony have the sole power to lay taxes and impositions upon the inhabitants of this colony; and that every attempt to vest such a power in any person or persons whatsoever, other than the general assembly aforesaid, has a manifest tendency to destroy British as well as American freedom.

Resolved, Therefore, that the general assembly of this colony has the exclusive authority to impose taxes and requirements on the people living here; and that any effort to give this power to anyone else, other than the aforementioned general assembly, clearly threatens both British and American freedom.


NOTE—No. IV.—See Page 371.

"The members of this congress, sincerely devoted with the warmest sentiments of affection and duty, to his majesty's person and government, inviolably attached to the present happy establishment of the protestant succession, and with minds deeply impressed by a sense of the present and impending misfortunes of the British colonies on this continent; having considered, as maturely as time will permit, the circumstances of the said colonies, esteem it our indispensable duty to make the following declarations of our humble opinion, respecting the most essential rights and liberties of the colonists, and of the grievances under which they labour, by reason of several late acts of parliament.

"The members of this congress, genuinely committed with deep feelings of loyalty and duty to his majesty and his government, firmly dedicated to the current positive establishment of the Protestant succession, and with minds heavily weighed down by the awareness of the current and looming difficulties facing the British colonies on this continent; after considering, as thoroughly as time allows, the circumstances of these colonies, believe it is our necessary duty to present the following statements of our humble opinion regarding the most important rights and freedoms of the colonists, and the grievances they are facing due to several recent acts of parliament."

I. That his majesty's subjects in these colonies, owe the same allegiance to the crown of Great Britain that is owing from his subjects born within the realm, and all due subordination to that august body the parliament of Great Britain.

I. That the subjects of His Majesty in these colonies owe the same loyalty to the crown of Great Britain as those born within the kingdom, along with all the appropriate respect to that esteemed institution, the Parliament of Great Britain.

II. That his majesty's liege subjects in these colonies, are entitled to all the inherent rights and liberties of his natural born subjects, within the kingdom of Great Britain.

II. That his majesty's loyal subjects in these colonies are entitled to all the inherent rights and freedoms of his natural-born subjects within the kingdom of Great Britain.

III. That it is inseparably essential to the freedom of a people, and the undoubted right of Englishmen, that no taxes be imposed on them, but with their own consent, given personally, or by their representatives.

III. It is absolutely necessary for the freedom of a people and the clear right of English citizens that no taxes can be imposed on them without their own consent, given either personally or through their representatives.

IV. That the people of these colonies are not, and, from their local circumstances, cannot be represented in the house of commons of Great Britain.

IV. The people in these colonies are not, and because of their local situations, cannot be represented in the House of Commons of Great Britain.

V. That the only representatives of these colonies are persons chosen therein by themselves, and that no taxes ever have been, or can be constitutionally imposed upon them, but by their respective legislatures.

V. That the only representatives of these colonies are people selected by themselves, and that no taxes have ever been, or can be, constitutionally imposed on them, except by their own legislatures.

VI. That all supplies to the crown being free gifts from the people, it is unreasonable, and inconsistent with the principles and spirit of the British constitution, for the people of Great Britain to grant to his majesty the property of the colonists.

VI. Since all supplies to the crown are voluntary gifts from the people, it is unreasonable and goes against the principles and spirit of the British constitution for the people of Great Britain to give his majesty the property of the colonists.

VII. That trial by jury is the inherent and invaluable right of every British subject in these colonies.

VII. The right to a trial by jury is an essential and invaluable right of every British citizen in these colonies.

VIII. That the late act of parliament entitled, 'an act for granting and applying certain stamp duties, and other duties, in the British colonies and plantations in America,' &c. by imposing taxes on the inhabitants of these colonies; and the said act, and several other acts, by extending the jurisdiction of the courts of admiralty beyond its ancient limits, have a manifest tendency to subvert the rights and liberties of the colonists.

VIII. The recent act of parliament called 'an act for granting and applying certain stamp duties, and other duties, in the British colonies and plantations in America,' etc., by imposing taxes on the residents of these colonies, along with this act and several others, by expanding the jurisdiction of the admiralty courts beyond their traditional boundaries, clearly aims to undermine the rights and freedoms of the colonists.

IX. That the duties imposed by several late acts of parliament, from the peculiar circumstances of these colonies, will be extremely burdensome and grievous; and from the scarcity of specie, the payment of them absolutely impracticable.

IX. The duties set by several recent acts of parliament will be very burdensome and difficult due to the unique circumstances of these colonies, and because there is a lack of cash, paying them will be completely unfeasible.

X. That as the profits of the trade of these colonies ultimately centre in Great Britain, to pay for the manufactures which they are obliged to take from thence, they eventually contribute very largely to all supplies granted to the crown.

X. Since the profits from the trade of these colonies ultimately go to Great Britain to pay for the manufactured goods they have to buy from there, they end up contributing a significant amount to all supplies provided to the crown.

XI. That the restrictions imposed by several late acts of parliament on the trade of these colonies, will render them unable to purchase the manufactures of Great Britain.

XI. The restrictions imposed by several recent acts of parliament on the trade of these colonies will make it impossible for them to buy the products made in Great Britain.

XII. That the increase, prosperity, and happiness of these colonies depend on the full and free enjoyment of their rights and liberties, and an intercourse with Great Britain mutually affectionate and advantageous.

XII. That the growth, prosperity, and happiness of these colonies depend on the complete and unrestricted enjoyment of their rights and freedoms, and a relationship with Great Britain that is both caring and beneficial.

XIII. That it is the right of the British subjects in these colonies to petition the king, or either house of parliament.

XIII. That the British subjects in these colonies have the right to petition the king or either house of parliament.

XIV. That it is the indispensable duty of these colonies, to the best of sovereigns, to the mother country, and to themselves, to endeavour, by a loyal and dutiful address to his majesty, and humble applications to both houses of parliament, to procure the repeal of the act for granting and applying certain stamp duties, of all clauses of any other acts of parliament, whereby the jurisdiction of the admiralty is extended as aforesaid, and of the other late acts for the restriction of American commerce."

XIV. It is the essential responsibility of these colonies, to the best of their ability, to the mother country, and to themselves, to try, through a loyal and respectful message to his majesty, and polite requests to both houses of parliament, to get the repeal of the law that imposes certain stamp duties, of all parts of any other laws where the jurisdiction of the admiralty is extended as mentioned, and of the recent laws that restrict American trade.

Prior Documents.

Previous Documents.


NOTE—No. V.—See Page 383.

Province of Massachusetts Bay, Feb. 11, 1768.

Province of Massachusetts Bay, February 11, 1768.

Sir,

Hey,

The house of representatives of this province have taken into their consideration the great difficulties that must accrue to themselves and their constituents, by the operation of the several acts of parliament imposing duties and taxes on the American colonies.

The House of Representatives of this province has considered the significant challenges that will arise for themselves and their constituents due to the various acts of Parliament that impose duties and taxes on the American colonies.

As it is a subject in which every colony is deeply interested, they have no reason to doubt but your house is duly impressed with its importance: and that such constitutional measures will be come into as are proper. It seems to be necessary, that all possible care should be taken that the representations of the several assemblies, upon so delicate a point, should harmonise with each other: the house, therefore, hope that this letter will be candidly considered in no other light, than as expressing a disposition freely to communicate their mind to a sister colony, upon a common concern, in the same manner as they would be glad to receive the sentiments of your or any other house of assembly on the continent.

Since this is a topic that every colony cares about, they have no reason to doubt that your house understands its significance and will take appropriate constitutional actions. It seems essential that all possible care be taken to ensure that the representations from the various assemblies on such a sensitive issue align with one another. Therefore, the house hopes that this letter will be viewed openly, solely as an attempt to share their thoughts with a fellow colony on a shared concern, just as they would appreciate hearing from your assembly or any other assembly on the continent.

The house have humbly represented to the ministry their own sentiments; that his majesty's high court of parliament is the supreme legislative power over the whole empire: that in all free states the constitution is fixed: and, as the supreme legislative derives its power and authority from the constitution, it cannot overleap the bounds of it, without destroying its foundation; that the constitution ascertains and limits both sovereignty and allegiance; and therefore, his majesty's American subjects who acknowledge themselves bound by the ties of allegiance, have an equitable claim to the full enjoyment of the fundamental rules of the British constitution; that it is an essential unalterable right in nature, ingrafted into the British constitution as a fundamental law, and ever held sacred and irrevocable by the subjects within the realm, that what a man hath honestly acquired is absolutely his own, which he may freely give, but cannot be taken from him without his consent; that the American subjects may therefore, exclusive of any consideration of charter rights, with a decent firmness adapted to the character of freemen and subjects, assert this natural and constitutional right.

The house has respectfully communicated to the ministry their views; that the King’s high court of parliament is the ultimate legislative power over the entire empire: that in all free states the constitution is established: and, since the supreme legislative derives its power and authority from the constitution, it cannot exceed its limits without undermining its foundation; that the constitution defines and restricts both sovereignty and allegiance; and therefore, the King’s American subjects who recognize their allegiance have a fair claim to fully enjoy the fundamental principles of the British constitution; that it is an essential and unchangeable right in nature, embedded in the British constitution as a fundamental law, and always held sacred and irrevocable by the subjects within the realm, that what a person has honestly acquired is completely his own, which he may freely give away, but cannot be taken from him without his consent; that the American subjects may therefore, aside from any consideration of charter rights, assert this natural and constitutional right with a respectful firmness befitting the character of free people and subjects.

It is moreover their humble opinion, which they express with the greatest deference to the wisdom of the parliament, that the acts made there, imposing duties on the people of this province, with the sole and express purpose of raising a revenue, are infringements of their natural and constitutional rights; because as they are not represented in the British parliament, his majesty's commons in Britain by those acts grant their property without their consent.

It is also their humble opinion, which they state with the utmost respect for the wisdom of Parliament, that the laws made there, imposing taxes on the people of this province solely to raise revenue, violate their natural and constitutional rights; because, as they are not represented in the British Parliament, His Majesty's Commons in Britain is granting their property without their consent through those laws.

This house further are of opinion, that their constituents, considering their local circumstances, cannot by any possibility be represented in the parliament; and that it will forever be impracticable that they should be equally represented there, and consequently not at all, being separated by an ocean of a thousand leagues: that his majesty's royal predecessors, for this reason, were graciously pleased to form a subordinate legislative here, that their subjects might enjoy the unalienable right of a representation. Also, that, considering the utter impracticability of their ever being fully and equally represented in parliament, and the great expense that must unavoidably attend even a partial representation there, this house think, that a taxation of their constituents, even without their consent, grievous as it is, would be preferable to any representation that could be admitted for them there.

This house believes that their constituents, given their local circumstances, cannot possibly be represented in parliament. It will always be impractical for them to have equal representation there, or any representation at all, being separated by an ocean of a thousand leagues. For this reason, the royal predecessors graciously established a local legislature so that their subjects could enjoy the unalienable right to representation. Moreover, considering the complete impracticality of ever having full and equal representation in parliament, and the significant cost that would inevitably come with even a partial representation there, this house feels that taxing their constituents, even without their consent, as burdensome as it is, would be better than any representation they could possibly have in parliament.

Upon these principles, and also considering that were the right in the parliament ever so clear, yet for obvious reasons it would be beyond the rule of equity, that their constituents should be taxed on the manufactures of Great Britain here, in addition to the duties they pay for them in England, and other advantages arising to Great Britain from the acts of trade; this house have preferred a humble, dutiful, and loyal petition to our most gracious sovereign, and made such representation to his majesty's ministers, as they apprehend would tend to obtain redress.

Based on these principles, and also considering that even if the parliament's right was completely clear, it would still not be reasonable for their constituents to be taxed on British goods here, in addition to the duties they already pay in England, along with other benefits Great Britain gains from trade laws; this house has submitted a humble, respectful, and loyal petition to our gracious sovereign and conveyed such a representation to the king's ministers, believing it would help achieve a resolution.

They have also submitted to consideration, whether any people can be said to enjoy any degree of freedom, if the crown, in addition to its undoubted authority of constituting a governor, should appoint him such a stipend as it shall judge proper without the consent of the people, and at their expense; and whether, while the judges of the land, and other civil officers, hold not their commissions during good behaviour, their having salaries appointed for them by the crown, independent of the people, hath not a tendency to subvert the principles of equity, and endanger the happiness and security of the subject.

They have also raised the question of whether any group can truly be considered free if the crown, in addition to its clear power to appoint a governor, decides on his salary without the people's consent and at their expense. They also question whether judges and other civil officers, who do not hold their positions based on good behavior, having their salaries set by the crown rather than the people, could undermine principles of fairness and jeopardize the happiness and safety of the citizens.

In addition to these measures, the house have written a letter to their agent Mr. de Berdt, the sentiments of which he is directed to lay before the ministry; wherein they take notice of the hardship of the act for preventing mutiny and desertion, which requires the governor and council to provide enumerated articles for the king's marching troops and the people to pay the expense: and also the commission of the gentlemen appointed commissioners of the customs to reside in America, which authorises them to make as many appointments as they think fit, and to pay the appointees what sums they please, for whose malconduct they are not accountable: from whence it may happen, that officers of the crown may be multiplied to such a degree, as to become dangerous to the liberties of the people, by virtue of a commission which doth not appear to this house to derive any such advantages to trade as many have been led to expect.

In addition to these actions, the house has sent a letter to their agent Mr. de Berdt, which he is instructed to present to the ministry; in this letter, they highlight the difficulties posed by the act to prevent mutiny and desertion, which requires the governor and council to provide specified supplies for the king's marching troops, and the people are responsible for covering the costs. They also address the commission for the gentlemen appointed as customs commissioners to operate in America, which allows them to make as many appointments as they see fit and to compensate those appointed whatever amounts they choose, without being held accountable for their misconduct. As a result, it could lead to an increase in crown officers to a level that threatens the people's freedoms, through a commission that, in the view of this house, does not seem to offer the trade benefits that many have been led to anticipate.

These are the sentiments and proceedings of the house, and as they have too much reason to believe that the enemies of the colonies have represented them to his majesty's ministers and the parliament as factious, disloyal, and having a disposition to make themselves independent of the mother country, they have taken occasion in the most humble terms, to assure his majesty and his ministers, that, with regard to the people of this province, and, as they doubt not, of all the colonies, the charge is unjust.

These are the thoughts and actions of the house, and since they have strong reasons to believe that the enemies of the colonies have portrayed them to the King’s ministers and Parliament as rebellious, disloyal, and eager to break away from the mother country, they have taken the opportunity, in the most respectful terms, to assure the King and his ministers that, concerning the people of this province, and they are confident this applies to all the colonies, the accusation is unfair.

The house is fully satisfied, that your assembly is too generous and enlarged in sentiment to believe, that this letter proceeds from an ambition of taking the lead, or dictating to the other assemblies; they freely submit their opinion to the judgment of others; and shall take it kind in your house to point out to them anything further that may be thought necessary.

The house is completely confident that your assembly is too generous and open-minded to think that this letter comes from a desire to take charge or tell other assemblies what to do; they willingly share their opinion for others to consider and would appreciate it if your house could suggest anything else that might be deemed necessary.

This house cannot conclude without expressing their firm confidence in the king, our common head and father, that the united and dutiful supplications of his distressed American subjects will meet with his royal and favourable acceptance.

This house cannot conclude without expressing their strong belief in the king, our common leader and father, that the united and respectful requests of his troubled American subjects will receive his royal and favorable acceptance.


NOTE—No. VI.—See Page 410.

An account of the origin of these committees, and of their mode of proceeding, is thus given by Mr. Gordon, and is not unworthy of attention.

Mr. Gordon provides an account of how these committees started and how they operate, which is worth paying attention to.

"Governor Hutchinson and his adherents having been used to represent the party in opposition, as only an uneasy factious few in Boston, while the body of the people were quite contented; Mr. Samuel Adams was thereby induced to visit Mr. James Warren, of Plymouth. After conversing upon the subject, the latter proposed to originate and establish committees of correspondence in the several towns of the colony, in order to learn the strength of the friends to the rights of the continent, and to unite and increase their force. Mr. Samuel Adams returned to Boston, pleased with the proposal, and communicated the same to his confidents. Some doubted whether the measure would prosper, and dreaded a disappointment which might injure the cause of liberty. But it was concluded to proceed. The prime managers were about six in number, each of whom, when separate, headed a division; the several individuals of which, collected and led distinct subdivisions. In this manner the political engine has been constructed. The different parts are not equally good and operative. Like other bodies, its composition includes numbers who act mechanically, as they are pressed this way or that way by those who judge for them; and divers of the wicked, fitted for evil practices, when the adoption of them is thought necessary to particular purposes, and a part of whose creed it is, that in political matters the public good is above every other consideration, and that all rules of morality when in competition with it, may be safely dispensed with. When any important transaction is to be brought forward, it is thoroughly considered by the prime managers. If they approve, each communicates it to his own division; from thence, if adopted, it passes to the several subdivisions, which form a general meeting in order to canvass the business. The prime managers being known only by few to be the promoters of it, are desired to be present at the debate, that they may give their opinion when it closes. If they observe that the collected body is in general strongly against the measure they wish to have carried, they declare it to be improper: is it opposed by great numbers, but not warmly, they advise to a re-consideration at another meeting, and prepare for its being then adopted; if the opposition is not considerable, either in number or weight of persons, they give their reasons, and then recommend the adoption of the measure. The principal actors are determined on securing the liberties of their country, or perishing in the attempt.

"Governor Hutchinson and his supporters had been portraying the opposing party as just a small, troublesome group in Boston, while claiming that the majority of people were quite satisfied. This led Mr. Samuel Adams to pay a visit to Mr. James Warren in Plymouth. After discussing the matter, Warren suggested establishing committees of correspondence in various towns across the colony to gauge the support for the rights of the continent and to unite and strengthen that support. Adams returned to Boston enthusiastic about the idea and shared it with his confidants. Some were skeptical about whether the plan would be successful and feared it could harm the cause of liberty. However, they decided to move forward. The primary organizers numbered around six, each leading a division that included various individuals heading smaller subdivisions. In this way, the political structure was formed. The different parts are not equally effective. Like other groups, it includes many who act mechanically, swayed by those who make decisions for them, and some who are intent on wrongdoing when necessary for specific purposes, believing that in politics, the public good trumps all other considerations and that moral guidelines can be disregarded when they conflict with it. When an important issue is to be addressed, it is carefully considered by the main organizers. If they support it, each one shares it with their division; if accepted, it then moves to the subdivisions, which convene to discuss the matter. The main organizers, known only to a few as the promoters, are requested to attend the debate so they can share their views once it concludes. If they notice that the gathered group strongly opposes the proposal, they declare it inappropriate; if the opposition is substantial but not passionate, they suggest reconsideration at another meeting and prepare for it to be adopted then; if opposition is minimal in number or influence, they present their reasoning and recommend adopting the measure. The key players are resolved to secure their country's freedoms or die trying."

"The news of his majesty's granting salaries to the justices of the superior court, afforded them a fair opportunity for executing the plan of establishing committees of correspondence through the colony. The most spirited pieces were published, and an alarm spread, that the granting such salaries tended rapidly to complete the system of their slavery.

"The news of the king granting salaries to the justices of the superior court gave them a great chance to set up committees of correspondence throughout the colony. The most passionate articles were published, and a panic spread that giving such salaries was quickly driving them toward complete slavery."

"A town meeting was called, and a committee of correspondence appointed, to write circular letters to all the towns in the province, and to induce them to unite in measures. The committee made a report, containing several resolutions contradictory to the supremacy of the British legislature. After setting forth, that all men have a right to remain in a state of nature as long as they please, they proceed to a report upon the natural rights of the colonists as men, christians, and subjects; and then form a list of infringements and violations of their rights. They enumerate and dwell upon the British parliament's having assumed the power of legislation for the colonies in all cases whatsoever—the appointment of a number of new officers to superintend the revenues—the granting of salaries out of the American revenue, to the governor, the judges of the superior court, the king's attorney and solicitor general. The report was accepted; copies printed; and six hundred circulated through the towns and districts of the province, with a pathetic letter addressed to the inhabitants, who were called upon not to doze any longer, or sit supinely in indifference, while the iron hand of oppression was daily tearing the choicest fruits from the fair tree of liberty. The circular letter requested of each town a free communication of sentiments on the subjects of the report, and was directed to the select men, who were desired to lay the same before a town meeting, which has been generally practised, and the proceedings of the town upon the business have been transmitted to the committee at Boston. This committee have their particular correspondents in the several towns, who, upon receiving any special information, are ready to spread it with dispatch among the inhabitants. It consists of twenty-one persons of heterogeneous qualities and professions, &c."

A town meeting was called, and a correspondence committee was set up to write circular letters to all the towns in the province, encouraging them to join together in action. The committee submitted a report with several resolutions that challenged the authority of the British legislature. After stating that everyone has the right to stay in a state of nature as long as they want, they proceeded to report on the natural rights of the colonists as individuals, Christians, and subjects; then they created a list of violations of their rights. They detailed how the British parliament had taken on the power of legislation for the colonies in all matters, appointed new officials to oversee the revenues, and granted salaries from American revenue to the governor, the judges of the superior court, and the king's attorney and solicitor general. The report was approved, printed, and six hundred copies were distributed throughout the towns and districts of the province, accompanied by an emotional letter to the residents, urging them not to remain passive or indifferent while the oppressive hand of tyranny was taking the best fruits from the beautiful tree of liberty. The circular letter asked each town to freely share their thoughts on the report's topics and was sent to the selectmen, who were asked to present it at a town meeting, a common practice, with the results being sent to the committee in Boston. This committee has specific correspondents in the various towns who, upon receiving any important information, are ready to quickly share it with the residents. It consists of twenty-one individuals with diverse backgrounds and professions, etc.

Gordon's Hist. Am. War, vol. I. p. 312.

Gordon's Hist. Am. War, vol. I. p. 312.


NOTE—No. VII.—See Page 425.

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE MEMBERS COMPOSING THE FIRST CONGRESS:

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE MEMBERS OF THE FIRST CONGRESS:

New Hampshire.

John Sullivan,
Nathaniel Fulsom.

Massachusetts Bay.

James Bowdoin,
Thomas Cushing,
Samuel Adams,
John Adams,
Robert Treat Paine.

Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.

Stephen Hopkins,
Samuel Ward.

Connecticut.

Eliphalet Dyer,
Roger Sherman,
Silas Deane.

From the city and county of New York, and other counties
in province of New York.


James Duane,
Henry Wisner,
John Jay,
Philip Livingston,
Isaac Low,
John Alsop.

From the county of Suffolk, in the province of New York.

William Floyd.

New Jersey.

James Kinsey,
William Livingston,
John Dehart,
Stephen Crane,
Richard Smith.

Pennsylvania.

Joseph Galloway,
Charles Humphreys,
Samuel Rhoads,
George Ross,
John Morton,
Thomas Mifflin,
Edward Biddle,
John Dickinson.

Newcastle, Kent, and Sussex, on Delaware.

Cesar Rodney,
Thomas M'Kean,
George Read.

Maryland.

Robert Goldsborough,
Thomas Johnson,
William Paca,
Samuel Chase,
Matthew Tilghman.

Virginia.

Peyton Randolph,
Richard Henry Lee,
George Washington,
Patrick Henry,
Richard Bland,
Benjamin Harrison,
Edmund Pendleton.

North Carolina.

William Hooper,
Joseph Hughes,
Richard Caswell.

South Carolina.

Henry Middleton,
John Rutledge,
Thomas Lynch,
Christopher Gadsden,
Edward Rutledge.

New Hampshire.

John Sullivan,
Nathaniel Fulsom.

Massachusetts Bay.

James Bowdoin,
Thomas Cushing,
Samuel Adams,
John Adams,
Robert Treat Paine.

Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.

Stephen Hopkins,
Samuel Ward.

Connecticut.

Eliphalet Dyer,
Roger Sherman,
Silas Deane.

From the city and county of New York, and other counties
in province of New York.


James Duane,
Henry Wisner,
John Jay,
Philip Livingston,
Isaac Low,
John Alsop.

From the county of Suffolk, in the province of New York.

William Floyd.

New Jersey.

James Kinsey,
William Livingston,
John Dehart,
Stephen Crane,
Richard Smith.

Pennsylvania.

Joseph Galloway,
Charles Humphreys,
Samuel Rhoads,
George Ross,
John Morton,
Thomas Mifflin,
Edward Biddle,
John Dickinson.

Newcastle, Kent, and Sussex, on Delaware.

Cesar Rodney,
Thomas M'Kean,
George Read.

Maryland.

Robert Goldsborough,
Thomas Johnson,
William Paca,
Samuel Chase,
Matthew Tilghman.

Virginia.

Peyton Randolph,
Richard Henry Lee,
George Washington,
Patrick Henry,
Richard Bland,
Benjamin Harrison,
Edmund Pendleton.

North Carolina.

William Hooper,
Joseph Hughes,
Richard Caswell.

South Carolina.

Henry Middleton,
John Rutledge,
Thomas Lynch,
Christopher Gadsden,
Edward Rutledge.


NOTE—No. VIII.—See Page 425.

These resolutions manifested a degree of irritation which had not before been displayed. They are introduced in the following manner:

These resolutions showed a level of annoyance that had not been seen before. They are presented in the following way:

"Whereas the power but not the justice, the vengeance but not the wisdom of Great Britain, which of old persecuted, scourged, and exiled our fugitive parents from their native shores, now pursues us their guiltless children, with unrelenting severity; and whereas this, then savage and uncultivated desert, was purchased by the toil and treasure, or acquired by the blood and valour of those our venerable progenitors; to us they bequeathed the dear bought inheritance; to our care and protection they consigned it; and the most sacred obligations are upon us to transmit the glorious purchase, unfettered by power, unclogged with shackles, to our innocent and beloved offspring. On the fortitude, on the wisdom, and on the exertions of this important day, is suspended the fate of this new world, and of unborn millions. If a boundless extent of continent, swarming with millions, will tamely submit to live, move, and have their being at the arbitrary will of a licentious minister, they basely yield to voluntary slavery, and future generations shall load their memories with incessant execrations. On the other hand, if we arrest the hand which would ransack our pockets, if we disarm the parricide which points the dagger to our bosoms, if we nobly defeat that fatal edict which proclaims a power to frame laws for us in all cases whatsoever, thereby entailing the endless and numberless curses of slavery upon us, our heirs, and their heirs for ever; if we successfully resist that unparalleled usurpation of unconstitutional power, whereby our capital is robbed of the means of life; whereby the streets of Boston are thronged with military executioners; whereby our coasts are lined, and harbours crowded with ships of war; whereby the charter of the colony, that sacred barrier against the encroachments of tyranny, is mutilated, and in effect annihilated; whereby a murderous law is framed to shelter villains from the hands of justice; whereby the unalienable and inestimable inheritance, which we derived from nature, the constitution of Britain, and the privileges warranted to us in the charter of the province, is totally wrecked, annulled, and vacated: Posterity will acknowledge that virtue which preserved them free and happy; and while we enjoy the rewards and blessings of the faithful, the torrent of panegyrists will roll our reputations to that latest period, when the streams of time shall be absorbed in the abyss of eternity.

"While Great Britain has power, it lacks justice; it seeks revenge but shows no wisdom. This is the same nation that persecuted, punished, and banished our fleeing ancestors from their homeland, and now it relentlessly targets us, their innocent children. This land, once a wild and uncultivated wilderness, was acquired through the labor and sacrifice, or the blood and bravery of our respected ancestors. They passed on this hard-won inheritance to us, entrusting it to our care and protection. It is our sacred duty to ensure that we hand down this valuable gift, free from oppression and unburdened by chains, to our innocent and cherished children. The fate of this new world and of future generations depends on the courage, wisdom, and efforts of this critical day. If a vast continent, filled with millions of people, passively chooses to live, move, and exist at the whim of a reckless leader, they resign themselves to voluntary slavery, and future generations will remember them with endless curses. On the other hand, if we stop those who would rob us, if we disarm the traitors aiming to harm us, if we courageously resist the lethal decree that claims the authority to make laws for us in every way, placing us, our children, and their children under the oppressive curse of slavery; if we successfully oppose that outrageous seizure of unconstitutional power, which robs our capital of the means to survive, fills the streets of Boston with military enforcers, crowds our coasts and harbors with warships, mutilates our colony’s charter—the sacred protection against tyranny—constructs a murderous law to protect criminals from justice, and completely destroys the unalienable and invaluable inheritance we received from nature, the British constitution, and the rights granted to us in the colony’s charter: Future generations will recognize the virtue that kept them free and happy; and as we reap the rewards and blessings of our efforts, praises for our legacy will flow throughout time, until time itself is lost in the depths of eternity."

"Therefore resolved," &c. &c. &c.

"Therefore resolved," etc. etc. etc.


NOTE—No. IX.—See Page 427.

"Whereas, since the close of the last war, the British parliament, claiming a power, of right, to bind the people of America by statutes in all cases whatsoever, hath in some acts expressly imposed taxes on them; and in others, under various pretences, but in fact for the purpose of raising a revenue, hath imposed rates and duties payable in these colonies, established a board of commissioners with unconstitutional powers, and extended the jurisdiction of courts of admiralty, not only for collecting the said duties, but for the trial of causes merely arising within the body of a county.

"Since the end of the last war, the British Parliament has claimed the right to impose laws on the people of America in every situation. In some cases, they have explicitly placed taxes on them; in others, under various pretenses, but really to generate revenue, they have set fees and duties that must be paid in these colonies, created a board of commissioners with unconstitutional powers, and expanded the jurisdiction of admiralty courts, not just for collecting these duties but also for handling cases that should be resolved within a county."

"And whereas, in consequence of other statutes, judges, who before held only estates at will in their offices, have been made dependent on the crown alone for their salaries, and standing armies kept in times of peace: And whereas it has lately been resolved in parliament, that by force of a statute, made in the thirty-fifth year of the reign of King Henry VIII. colonists may be transported to England and tried there upon accusations for treasons, and mis prisons and concealments of treasons committed in the colonies, and by a late statute, such trials have been directed in cases therein mentioned.

"And because of other laws, judges who previously held only temporary positions have become dependent solely on the crown for their salaries, and standing armies have been maintained during peacetime: And because it has recently been decided in parliament that, under a law passed in the thirty-fifth year of King Henry VIII's reign, colonists can be sent to England and tried there on charges of treason, including misprision and concealment of treason committed in the colonies, and under a recent law, such trials have been mandated in specified cases."

"And whereas, in the last session of parliament, three statutes were made; one entitled, 'An act to discontinue in such manner and for such time as are therein mentioned, the landing and discharging, lading or shipping of goods, wares, and merchandise, at the town, and within the harbour of Boston, in the province of Massachusetts Bay in North America;' another entitled, 'An act for the better regulating the government of the province of Massachusetts Bay in New England;' and another act, entitled, 'An act for the impartial administration of justice, in the cases of persons questioned for any act done by them in the execution of the law, or for the suppression of riots and tumults, in the province of the Massachusetts Bay in New England;' and another statute was then made, 'for making more effectual provision for the government of the province of Quebec,' &c. All which statutes are impolitic, unjust, and cruel, as well as unconstitutional, and most dangerous and destructive of American rights.

"And in the last session of Parliament, three laws were passed; one titled 'An act to stop the unloading, loading, or shipping of goods, merchandise, and wares in the town and harbor of Boston, in the province of Massachusetts Bay in North America for a specified time;' another titled 'An act for better regulating the government of the province of Massachusetts Bay in New England;' and another law, titled 'An act for fair administration of justice in cases involving individuals questioned for actions taken while enforcing the law or suppressing riots and disturbances in the province of Massachusetts Bay in New England;' and another law was also enacted 'to provide better governance for the province of Quebec,' etc. All of these laws are unwise, unfair, and cruel, as well as unconstitutional, posing a serious threat to American rights."

"And whereas, assemblies have been frequently dissolved, contrary to the rights of the people, when they attempted to deliberate on grievances; and their dutiful, humble, loyal, and reasonable petitions to the crown for redress, have been repeatedly treated with contempt by his majesty's ministers of state; the good people of the several colonies of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New Castle, Kent and Sussex on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, justly alarmed at the arbitrary proceedings of parliament and administration, have severally elected, constituted and appointed deputies to meet and sit in general congress, in the city of Philadelphia, in order to obtain such establishment, as that their religion, laws, and liberties, may not be subverted: whereupon the deputies so appointed being now assembled, in a full and free representation of these colonies, taking into their most serious consideration, the best means of attaining the ends aforesaid, do in the first place, as Englishmen their ancestors in like cases have usually done, for asserting and vindicating their rights and liberties, declare, that the inhabitants of the English colonies in North America, by the immutable laws of nature, the principles of the English constitution, and the several charters or compacts, have the following rights.

"And since assemblies have often been dissolved, against the rights of the people, when they tried to discuss their grievances; and their respectful, humble, loyal, and reasonable petitions to the crown for relief have been repeatedly ignored by the king's ministers; the good people of the various colonies of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, New Castle, Kent and Sussex on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina, rightly concerned about the arbitrary actions of parliament and the administration, have each elected, appointed, and designated representatives to gather and meet in general congress in the city of Philadelphia, to establish a framework so that their religion, laws, and liberties are not undermined: therefore, the appointed representatives, now assembled in a full and fair representation of these colonies, seriously considering the best ways to achieve these goals, firstly declare, as their ancestors did in similar situations, to assert and defend their rights and liberties, that the residents of the English colonies in North America, by the unchanging laws of nature, the principles of the English constitution, and the various charters or agreements, have the following rights."

"Resolved, unanimously, 1st, that they are entitled to life, liberty, and property; and they have never ceded to any sovereign power whatever, a right to dispose of either without their consent.

"Resolved, unanimously, 1st, that they have the right to life, freedom, and property; and they have never given any ruling authority the right to manage any of these without their approval."

"Resolved, unanimously, 2d, that our ancestors, who first settled these colonies, were, at the time of their emigration from the mother country, entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities of free and natural born subjects, within the realm of England.

"Resolved, unanimously, 2d, that our ancestors, who first settled these colonies, were, at the time of their emigration from the mother country, entitled to all the rights, liberties, and immunities of free and natural born subjects, within the realm of England."

"Resolved, unanimously, 3d, that by such emigration they by no means forfeited, surrendered, or lost any of those rights, but that they were, and their descendants now are, entitled to the exercise and enjoyment of all such of them, as their local and other circumstances enabled them to exercise and enjoy.

"Resolved, unanimously, 3d, that through this emigration they did not forfeit, give up, or lose any of those rights, but that they were, and their descendants now are, entitled to exercise and enjoy all of them, as their local and other circumstances allowed them to do."

"Resolved, 4th, that the foundation of English liberty and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council: and as the English colonists are not represented, and from their local and other circumstances cannot properly be represented in the British parliament, they are entitled to a free and exclusive power of legislation in their several provincial legislatures, where their right of representation can alone be preserved, in all cases of taxation and internal polity subject only to the negative of their sovereign, in such manner as has been heretofore used and accustomed: but from the necessity of the case, and a regard to the mutual interest of both countries, we cheerfully consent to the operation of such acts of the British parliament, as are, bona fide, restrained to the regulation of our external commerce, for the purposes of securing the commercial advantages of the whole empire to the mother country, and the commercial benefits of its respective members; excluding every idea of taxation internal or external, for raising a revenue on the subjects in America without their consent.

"Resolved, 4th, that the basis of English freedom and all free governments is the right of people to be involved in their legislative council: and since the English colonists are not represented and due to their local and other circumstances cannot effectively be represented in the British parliament, they have the right to create and enforce laws in their own provincial legislatures, where their right to representation can only be maintained, in all matters of taxation and internal governance, subject only to the veto of their sovereign, in the manner that has traditionally been used: however, given the necessity of the situation and considering the mutual interests of both countries, we willingly agree to the enforcement of those acts of the British parliament that are, bona fide, limited to regulating our external commerce, aimed at ensuring the commercial advantages of the entire empire for the mother country and the commercial benefits of its individual members; excluding any notion of internal or external taxation for generating revenue on subjects in America without their consent."

"Resolved, unanimously, 5th that the respective colonies are entitled to the common law of England, and more especially to the great and inestimable privilege of being tried by their peers of the vicinage, according to the course of that law.

"Resolved, unanimously, 5th that the colonies have the right to the common law of England, and especially to the invaluable privilege of being tried by their peers from their local area, following the processes of that law."

"Resolved, 6th, that they are entitled to the benefit of such of the English statutes, as existed at the time of their colonisation; and which they have, by experience, respectively found to be applicable to their several local and other circumstances.

"Resolved, 6th, that they are entitled to the benefits of the English statutes that were in place at the time of their colonization; and which they have, through experience, each found to be relevant to their various local and other situations."

"Resolved, unanimously, 7th, that these, his majesty's colonies are likewise entitled to all the immunities and privileges granted and confirmed to them by royal charters, or secured by their several codes of provincial laws.

"Resolved, unanimously, 7th, that these, his majesty's colonies are likewise entitled to all the immunities and privileges granted and confirmed to them by royal charters, or secured by their several codes of provincial laws."

"Resolved, unanimously, 8th, that they have a right peaceably to assemble, consider of their grievances, and petition the King; and that all prosecutions, prohibitory proclamations, and commitments for the same, are illegal.

"Resolved, unanimously, 8th, that they have the right to gather peacefully, discuss their complaints, and petition the King; and that any prosecutions, prohibitory proclamations, and arrests related to this are illegal."

"Resolved, unanimously, 9th, that the keeping a standing army in these colonies, in times of peace, without the consent of the legislature of that colony in which such army is kept, is against law.

"Resolved, unanimously, 9th, that maintaining a standing army in these colonies during peacetime, without the approval of the legislature of the colony where the army is stationed, is unlawful."

"Resolved, unanimously, 10th, it is indispensably necessary to good government, and rendered essential by the English constitution, that the constituent branches of the legislature be independent of each other; that, therefore, the exercise of legislative power in several colonies, by a council appointed, during pleasure, by the crown, is unconstitutional, dangerous, and destructive to the freedom of American legislation.

"Resolved, unanimously, 10th, it is absolutely necessary for good governance, and required by the English constitution, that the different branches of the legislature be independent from one another; therefore, the exercise of legislative power in several colonies by a council appointed at the pleasure of the crown is unconstitutional, dangerous, and harmful to the freedom of American legislation."

"All and each of which the aforesaid deputies, in behalf of themselves and their constituents, do claim, demand, and insist on, as their indubitable rights and liberties; which cannot be legally taken from them, altered or abridged by any power whatever, without their own consent, by their representatives in their several provincial legislatures.

"Each of these deputies, on behalf of themselves and their constituents, claims, demands, and insists on their undeniable rights and freedoms; these cannot be legally taken from them, changed, or limited by any authority without their consent, through their representatives in their respective provincial legislatures."

"In the course of our inquiry, we find many infringements and violations of the foregoing rights, which, from an ardent desire that harmony and mutual intercourse of affection and interest may be restored, we pass over for the present, and proceed to state such acts and measures as have been adopted since the last war, which demonstrate a system formed to enslave America.

"In the course of our investigation, we find many violations and breaches of the above rights, which, out of a strong desire for harmony and mutual affection and interest to be restored, we will overlook for now, and instead, we will outline the actions and measures that have been taken since the last war, which show a plan designed to enslave America."

"Resolved, unanimously, that the following acts of parliament are infringements and violations of the rights of the colonists; and that the repeal of them is essentially necessary, in order to restore harmony between Great Britain and the American colonies, viz.

"Resolved, unanimously, that the following acts of parliament are violations of the rights of the colonists; and that repealing them is essential to restore harmony between Great Britain and the American colonies, namely:"

"The several acts of 4 Geo. III. chap. 15, and 34.—5 Geo. III. chap. 25.—6 Geo. III. chap. 52.—7 Geo. III. chap. 41, and chap. 46.—8 Geo. III. chap. 22; which imposed duties for the purpose of raising a revenue in America; extend the power of the admiralty courts beyond their ancient limits; deprive the American subject of trial by jury; authorise the judge's certificate to indemnify the prosecutor from damages, that he might otherwise be liable to; requiring oppressive security from a claimant of ships and goods seized, before he shall be allowed to defend his property, and are subversive of American rights.

"The various acts of 4 Geo. III. chap. 15, and 34.—5 Geo. III. chap. 25.—6 Geo. III. chap. 52.—7 Geo. III. chap. 41, and chap. 46.—8 Geo. III. chap. 22; which imposed taxes to raise revenue in America; extend the authority of the admiralty courts beyond their traditional boundaries; take away the American citizen's right to a jury trial; allow the judge's certificate to protect the prosecutor from damages they might otherwise face; require burdensome security from someone claiming ships and goods that have been seized before they can defend their property, and undermine American rights."

"Also 12 Geo. III. chap. 24, intitled, 'an act for the better securing his majesty's dockyards, magazines, ships, ammunition, and stores,' which declares a new offence in America, and deprives the American subject of a constitutional trial by a jury of the vicinage, by authorising the trial of any person charged with the committing of any offence described in the said act, out of the realm, to be indicted and tried for the same in any shire or county within the realm.

"Also 12 Geo. III. chap. 24, titled, 'an act for the better securing his majesty's dockyards, magazines, ships, ammunition, and stores,' which creates a new crime in America and takes away the American people's right to a trial by a jury from their local area by allowing the trial of anyone accused of any offense mentioned in this act to be charged and tried in any shire or county within the realm."

"Also the three acts passed in the last session of parliament, for stopping the port and blocking up the harbour of Boston, for altering the charter and government of Massachusetts Bay, and that which is intitled, 'an act for the better administration of justice,' &c.

"Also, the three laws passed in the last session of Parliament, to shut down the port and close off the harbor of Boston, to change the charter and government of Massachusetts Bay, and the one titled, 'an act for the better administration of justice,' etc."

"Also, the act passed in the same session for establishing the Roman catholic religion in the province of Quebec, abolishing the equitable system of English laws, and erecting a tyranny there, to the great danger, (from so total a dissimilarity of religion, law, and government) of the neighbouring British colonies, by the assistance of whose blood and treasure the said country was conquered from France.

"Also, the law passed in the same session to establish the Roman Catholic religion in the province of Quebec, eliminating the fair system of English laws, and creating a tyranny there, which poses a significant risk (due to such a complete difference in religion, law, and government) to the nearby British colonies, which were instrumental in conquering that territory from France with their blood and resources."

"Also, the act passed in the same session for the better providing suitable quarters for officers and soldiers in his majesty's service in North America.

"Also, the act passed in the same session to improve the provision of appropriate housing for officers and soldiers in His Majesty's service in North America."

"Also, that the keeping a standing army in several of these colonies, in time of peace, without the consent of the legislature of that colony in which such army is kept, is against law.

"Also, maintaining a standing army in several of these colonies during peacetime, without the approval of the legislature of the colony where that army is stationed, is illegal."

"To these grievous acts and measures, Americans cannot submit; but in hopes their fellow subjects in Great Britain will, on a revision of them, restore us to that state, in which both countries found happiness and prosperity, we have for the present only resolved to pursue the following peaceable measures: 1. to enter into a non-importation, non-consumption, and non-exportation agreement or association. 2. To prepare an address to the people of Great Britain, and a memorial to the inhabitants of British America: and, 3. To prepare a loyal address to his majesty, agreeable to resolutions already entered into."

"Americans cannot accept these serious actions and measures; however, we hope that our fellow subjects in Great Britain will reconsider them and bring us back to a time when both countries experienced happiness and prosperity. For now, we have decided to pursue the following peaceful actions: 1. to join a non-importation, non-consumption, and non-exportation agreement or association. 2. To prepare a message to the people of Great Britain and a petition to the people of British America; and, 3. To draft a loyal message to His Majesty, in line with resolutions we have already agreed upon."


END OF VOLUME I


FOOTNOTES

[1] The expressions of a resolution prepared by general Lee, and passed in the house of representatives of the United States, on their being informed of the death of general Washington.

[1] The statements of a resolution created by General Lee and approved by the House of Representatives of the United States upon learning about General Washington's death.

[2] The general estimate in the United States is, that their population doubles in twenty-five years.

[2] The common belief in the United States is that their population doubles every twenty-five years.

[3] Robertson. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer.

[4] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[5] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[6] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

[7] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

[8] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Smith.

[9] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[10] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[11] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[12] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[13] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[14] Stith. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stith. Smith.

[15] Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stith.

[16] Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stith.

[17] Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stith.

[18] Ibid.

Ibid.

[19] This error might very possibly be produced by the Indians representing the great western lakes as seas.

[19] This mistake could easily be caused by the Indians depicting the vast western lakes as seas.

[20] Dr. Robertson must allude to the country below the falls of the great rivers.

[20] Dr. Robertson must be referring to the area below the waterfalls of the major rivers.

[21] Robertson. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer.

[22] Charter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Charter.

[23] Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stith.

[24] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

[25] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

[26] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

[27] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

[28] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith. Beverly.

[29] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[30] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[31] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[32] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[33] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[34] Mr. Stith says the price for a wife was at first, one hundred, and afterwards, one hundred and fifty pounds of tobacco; and a debt so contracted was made of higher dignity than any other.

[34] Mr. Stith says the cost for a wife was initially one hundred pounds, and later, one hundred and fifty pounds of tobacco; and a debt like this was regarded as more important than any other.

[35] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[36] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[37] Ibid.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ibid.

[38] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[39] Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Stith.

[40] Robertson. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer.

[41] Robertson. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer.

[42] Idem.

Idem.

[43] Robertson. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer.

[44] Chalmer. Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Robertson.

[45] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[46] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[47] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[48] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[49] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[50] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[51] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[52] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[53] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[54] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[55] Robertson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson.

[56] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[57] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[58] Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Robertson. Chalmer. Hutchison.

[59] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[60] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[61] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[62] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[63] Hume.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hume.

[64] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[65] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[66] All the powers of government for nearly three years, seem to have been in the magistrates. Two were appointed in each town, who directed all the affairs of the plantation. The freemen appear to have had no voice in making the laws, or in any part of the government except in some instances of general and uncommon concern. In these instances committees were sent from the several towns to a general meeting. During this term, juries seem not to have been employed in any case.

[66] For almost three years, all government powers seemed to rest with the magistrates. Two were appointed in each town to oversee all matters of the settlement. The freemen appear to have had no say in creating laws or in any aspect of government, except in a few instances of general and unusual significance. In those cases, committees from various towns were sent to a general meeting. During this time, juries do not seem to have been used in any cases.

[67] Chalmer. Hutchison. Trumbull.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison. Trumbull.

[68] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[69] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[70] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[71] Hutchison.

Hutchison.

[72] This was an union, says Mr. Trumbull, of the highest consequence to the New England colonies. It made them formidable to the Dutch and Indians, and respectable among their French neighbours. It was happily adapted to maintain harmony among themselves, and to secure the rights and peace of the country. It was one of the principal means of the preservation of the colonies, during the civil wars, and unsettled state of affairs in England. It was the great source of mutual defence in Philip's war; and of the most eminent service in civilising the Indians, and propagating the Gospel among them. The union subsisted more than forty years, until the abrogation of the charters of the New England colonies by King James II.

[72] Mr. Trumbull states that this union was extremely important for the New England colonies. It made them a strong force against the Dutch and Indians, and gave them respect among their French neighbors. It helped maintain harmony among themselves and ensured the rights and peace in the region. It was a key factor in preserving the colonies during the civil wars and the unstable situation in England. It was crucial for mutual defense during King Philip's War and played a significant role in civilizing the Indians and spreading the Gospel among them. The union lasted for more than forty years until King James II revoked the charters of the New England colonies.

[73] Chalmer. Hutchison. Trumbull.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison. Trumbull.

[74] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[75] Ibid.

Ibid.

[76] In the subsequent year Parliament exempted New England from all taxes "until both houses should otherwise direct;" and, in 1646, all the colonies were exempted from all talliages except the excise, "provided their productions should be exported only in English bottoms."

[76] The following year, Parliament exempted New England from all taxes "until both houses decided otherwise;" and in 1646, all the colonies were exempted from all taxes except the excise, "as long as their goods were only exported in English ships."

[77] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[78] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[79] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[80] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[81] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[82] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[83] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[84] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[85] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[86] Virginia Laws. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Virginia Laws. Chalmer.

[87] Virginia Laws. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Virginia Laws. Chalmer.

[88] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[89] Chalmer. Trumbull.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Trumbull.

[90] Hutchison. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Chalmer.

[91] Idem.

Idem.

[92] Hutchison. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Chalmer.

[93] Hutchison. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Chalmer.

[94] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[95] Chalmer. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Smith.

[96] Chalmer. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Smith.

[97] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[98] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[99] Chalmer. History of South Carolina and Georgia.

[99] Chalmer. History of South Carolina and Georgia.

[100] Chalmer. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Beverly.

[101] Idem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same.

[102] Chalmer. Beverly.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Beverly.

[103] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[104] From a paper in possession of the British administration, it appears that in 1673, New England was supposed to contain one hundred and twenty thousand souls, of whom sixteen thousand were able to bear arms. Three-fourths of the wealth and population of the country, were in Massachusetts and its dependencies. The town of Boston alone contained fifteen hundred families.

[104] According to a document held by the British administration, it seems that in 1673, New England was estimated to have a population of one hundred twenty thousand people, with sixteen thousand of them capable of bearing arms. Three-quarters of the region's wealth and population were located in Massachusetts and its neighboring areas. The city of Boston alone had fifteen hundred families.

[105] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[106] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[107] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[108] Trumbull. Hutchison. Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Trumbull. Hutchison. Chalmer.

[109] Chalmer. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Hutchison.

[110] Trumbull. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Trumbull. Hutchison.

[111] Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Smith.

[112] Chalmer. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Smith.

[113] Chalmer. Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer. Smith.

[114] History of Pennsylvania. Chalmer.

History of Pennsylvania. Chalmer.

[115] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[116] Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Smith.

[117] Smith.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Smith.

[118] See note No. I, at the end of the volume.

[118] Check note No. I, at the end of the book.

[119] Hutchison. Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Belknap.

[120] Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap.

[121] The quotas assigned by the crown are as follows:

[121] The quotas set by the crown are as follows:

To Massachusetts Bay350
Rhode Island and Providence plantations48
Connecticut120
New York200
Pennsylvania80
Maryland160
Virginia240
 -----
 Total, 1,198

[122] Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap.

[123] Belknap. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap. Hutchison.

[124] So early as the year 1692, the difference of opinion between the mother country and the colonies on the great point, which afterwards separated them, made its appearance. The legislature of Massachusetts, employed in establishing a code of laws under their new charter, passed an act containing the general principles respecting the liberty of the subject, that are asserted in magna charta, in which was the memorable clause, "no aid, tax, talliage, assessment, custom, benevolence, or imposition whatsoever, shall be laid, assessed, imposed, or levied, on any of his majesty's subjects or their estates, on any pretence whatsoever, but by the act and consent of the governor, council, and representatives of the people, assembled in general court."

[124] As early as 1692, disagreements between the mother country and the colonies on the major issue that would later lead to their separation started to emerge. The legislature of Massachusetts, working on establishing a code of laws under their new charter, passed a law outlining the fundamental principles regarding individual liberty asserted in the Magna Carta. This law included the famous clause stating, "no aid, tax, talliage, assessment, custom, benevolence, or imposition whatsoever, shall be laid, assessed, imposed, or levied, on any of His Majesty's subjects or their estates, on any pretext whatsoever, but by the act and consent of the governor, council, and representatives of the people, assembled in general court."

It is scarcely necessary to add that the royal assent to this act was refused.

It’s hardly worth mentioning that the royal approval for this act was denied.

[125] History of South Carolina.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ South Carolina History.

[126] Chalmer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Chalmer.

[127] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[128] Hutchison. Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Belknap.

[129] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[130] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[131] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[132] History of South Carolina.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ South Carolina History.

[133] Idem.

Idem.

[134] In the same year Charleston was reduced to ashes. A large portion of its inhabitants passed, in one day, from prosperity to indigence. Under the pressure of this misfortune, the legislature applied to parliament for aid; and that body, with a liberality reflecting honour on its members, voted twenty thousand pounds, to be distributed among the sufferers.

[134] In the same year, Charleston was completely destroyed. A significant number of its residents went from having a comfortable life to being in poverty in just one day. Facing this tragedy, the legislature requested help from parliament, and that body, demonstrating generosity that reflected well on its members, allocated twenty thousand pounds to be given to those affected.

[135] About five and a half millions of dollars.

[135] About five and a half million dollars.

[136] Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap.

[137] Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap.

[138] It is said the secret was kept until a member who performed family devotion at his lodgings, betrayed it by praying for the divine blessing on the attempt.

[138] It's said that the secret was kept until a family member, who was praying at his place, accidentally revealed it by asking for divine help with the attempt.

[139] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[140] The day before the armament sailed from Massachusetts, an express boat, which had been dispatched to admiral Warren to solicit assistance, returned with the unwelcome intelligence that he declined furnishing the aid required. This information could not arrest the expedition. Fortunately for its success, the orders from England soon afterwards reached the admiral, who immediately detached a part of his fleet; which he soon followed himself in the Superb, of sixty guns.

[140] The day before the ships set sail from Massachusetts, a fast boat that had been sent to Admiral Warren requesting help returned with the disappointing news that he refused to provide the assistance needed. This information couldn’t stop the expedition. Fortunately for its success, orders from England soon arrived for the admiral, who immediately sent out part of his fleet; he soon followed himself on the Superb, which had sixty guns.

[141] Belknap. Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belknap. Hutchison.

[142] Hutchison. Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison. Belknap.

[143] Hutchison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Hutchison.

[144] Abbe Raynal.

Abbe Raynal.

[145] The following estimate is taken from "The History of the British empire in North America," and is there said to be an authentic account from the militia rolls, poll taxes, bills of mortality, returns from governors, and other authorities.

[145] The estimate below is from "The History of the British Empire in North America," which claims to be an accurate record based on militia rolls, poll taxes, death records, reports from governors, and other sources.

The colonies ofInhabitants.
Halifax and Lunenberg in Nova Scotia5,000
New Hampshire30,000
Massachusetts Bay220,000
Rhode Island and Providence35,000
Connecticut100,000
New York100,000
The Jerseys60,000
Pennsylvania (then including Delaware)250,000
Maryland85,000
Virginia85,000
North Carolina45,000
South Carolina30,000
Georgia6,000
 ----------
 Total 1,051,000

The white inhabitants of the French colonies were thus estimated:

The white residents of the French colonies were therefore assessed:

The colonies of   Inhabitants.
Canada45,000
Louisiana7,000
 -------
 Total 52,000

[146] Minot Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot Gazette.

[147] See note No. II, at the end of the volume.

[147] Refer to note No. II, at the end of the book.

[148] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[149] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[150] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[151] Minot. Belknap. Entic.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Entic.

[152] Minot. Belknap. Entic.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Entice.

[153] He was also recalled from his government.

[153] He was also removed from his government position.

[154] The northern colonies had been enabled to attend to these representations, and, in some degree to comply with the requisitions made on them, by having received from the British government, in the course of the summer, a considerable sum of money as a reimbursement for the extraordinary expenses of the preceding year. One hundred and fifteen thousand pounds sterling had been apportioned among them, and this sum gave new vigour and energy to their councils.

[154] The northern colonies were able to respond to these requests and partially meet the demands placed on them because the British government had sent them a significant amount of money over the summer as reimbursement for the unusual expenses from the previous year. They received one hundred and fifteen thousand pounds sterling, which boosted their councils with renewed strength and motivation.

[155] Minot. Belknap. Entic.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Entic.

[156] Fussel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Fussel.

[157] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[158] Minot. Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap.

[159] Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel.

[160] Letter of general Abercrombie.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from General Abercrombie.

[161] Minot. Belknap.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap.

[162] Letter of colonel Bradstreet.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Bradstreet's letter.

[163] MSS.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Docs.

[164] Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel. Entic.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel. Entic.

[165] Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel. New York Gazette.

[165] Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel. New York Gazette.

[166] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[167] These accounts must be exaggerated. According to the letter of general Townshend, the force engaged on the Plains of Abraham amounted to three thousand five hundred men; and not more than fifteen hundred are stated to have been detached under Bougainville.

[167] These stories must be blown out of proportion. According to General Townshend's letter, the contingent involved on the Plains of Abraham was around three thousand five hundred men, and only about fifteen hundred are said to have been sent out under Bougainville.

[168] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[169] Belsham. Russel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham. Russel.

[170] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[171] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[172] Belsham. Russel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham. Russel.

[173] Townshend's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Townshend's letter.

[174] Townshend's letter. Belsham. Russel. Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Townshend's letter. Belsham. Russel. Gazette.

[175] Russel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Russel.

[176] Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belknap. Belsham. Russel.

[177] History of South Carolina and Georgia.

[177] History of South Carolina and Georgia.

[178] After the expulsion of the French from Canada, a considerable degree of ill humour was manifested in Massachusetts with respect to the manner in which the laws of trade were executed. A question was agitated in court, in which the colony took a very deep interest. A custom house officer applied for what was termed "a writ of assistance," which was an authority to search any house for dutiable articles suspected to be concealed in it. The right to grant special warrants was not contested; but this grant of a general warrant was deemed contrary to the principles of liberty, and an engine of oppression equally useless and vexatious, which would enable every petty officer of the customs to gratify his resentments by harassing the most respectable men in the province. The ill temper excited on this occasion was shown by a reduction of the salaries of the judges; but no diminution of attachment to the mother country appears to have been produced by it.

[178] After the French were kicked out of Canada, people in Massachusetts were pretty upset about how trade laws were being enforced. A legal question came up that the colony was really invested in. A customs officer asked for what was called "a writ of assistance," which would allow him to search any house for taxable items that he suspected were being hidden. The right to issue specific warrants wasn’t challenged, but giving out a general warrant was seen as a violation of freedom and an unnecessary, annoying tool of oppression. It would let any minor customs officer take out their frustrations on the most respected people in the province. The anger over this situation was reflected in a cut to judges' salaries, but it doesn’t seem to have decreased people's loyalty to the mother country.

[179] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[180] Belsham. Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham. Minot.

[181] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[182] 100,000l. sterling.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ £100,000.

[183] Mr. Pitt was not in the house; and Mr. Ingersoll, in his letter, states that Alderman Beckford joined General Conway. Mr. Belsham, therefore, who makes this statement, was probably mistaken.

[183] Mr. Pitt wasn't in the house, and Mr. Ingersoll mentions in his letter that Alderman Beckford teamed up with General Conway. So, Mr. Belsham, who said this, was likely mistaken.

[184] See note No. III, at the end of the volume.

[184] Check note No. III, at the back of the book.

[185] Prior documents. Virginia Gazette.

Prior documents. Virginia Gazette.

[186] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[187] See note No. IV, at the end of the volume.

[187] Check note No. IV, at the end of the book.

[188] Minot. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Previous documents.

[189] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[190] Minot. Prior documents. Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Previous documents. Belsham.

[191] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[192] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[193] Prior documents.

Prior documents.

[194] See note No. V, at the end of the volume.

[194] Check note No. V, at the end of the book.

[195] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[196] Prior documents.

Previous documents.

[197] In this letter the house of Burgesses express their opinion of the mutiny act in the following terms: "The act suspending the legislative power of New York, they consider as still more alarming to the colonies, though it has that single province in view. If parliament can compel them to furnish a single article to the troops sent over, they may, by the same rule, oblige them to furnish clothes, arms, and every other necessary, even the pay of the officers and soldiers; a doctrine replete with every mischief, and utterly subversive of all that's dear and valuable; for what advantage can the people of the colonies derive from choosing their own representatives, if those representatives, when chosen, be not permitted to exercise their own judgments, be under a necessity (on pain of being deprived of their legislative authority) of enforcing the mandates of a British parliament."

[197] In this letter, the House of Burgesses shares their view on the Mutiny Act, stating: "The act that suspends New York's legislative authority is even more alarming to the colonies, even though it targets just that one province. If Parliament can force them to supply even a single item to the troops sent over, they can likewise require them to provide clothing, weapons, and everything else necessary, including the pay for officers and soldiers. This doctrine is filled with potential harm and completely undermines everything that is precious and valuable; because what benefit do the colonies gain from electing their own representatives if those representatives, once chosen, are not allowed to use their own judgment and are compelled (under the threat of losing their legislative power) to carry out the orders of a British Parliament?"

[198] Prior documents.

Prior documents.

[199] Prior documents.

Prior documents.

[200] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[201] Minot. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Previous documents.

[202] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[203] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[204] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[205] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[206] Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gazette.

[207] Minot.

Minot.

[208] Belsham. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham. Previous documents.

[209] Gazette. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gazette. Previous documents.

[210] Gazette. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gazette. Previous documents.

[211] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[212] Gazette. Prior documents.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gazette. Previous documents.

[213] Prior documents. Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Previous documents. Minot.

[214] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[215] Prior documents.

Prior documents.

[216] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[217] Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ News.

[218] Minot. Prior documents. Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Previous documents. Gazette.

[219] Almost at the same time, and without concert, the same measure was adopted in Virginia.

[219] Almost simultaneously, and without coordination, the same action was taken in Virginia.

[220] See note No. VI, at the end of the volume.

[220] Check note No. VI, at the back of the book.

[221] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[222] Minot. Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot. Belsham.

[223] The language said by Mr. Gordon to have been used at this meeting proves that many of the people of Boston were already ripe for the revolution. To the more cautious among "the sons of liberty" who had expressed some apprehensions lest they should push the matter too far, and involve the colony in a quarrel with Great Britain, others answered "It must come to a quarrel between Great Britain and the colony sooner or later; and if so what can be a better time than the present? Hundreds of years may pass away before parliament will make such a number of acts in violation as it has done of late years, and by which it has excited so formidable an opposition to the measures of administration. Besides, the longer the contest is delayed, the more administration will be strengthened. Do not you observe how the government at home are increasing their party here by sending over young fellows to enjoy appointments, who marry into our best families, and so weaken the opposition? By such means, and by multiplying posts and places, and giving them to their own friends, or applying them to the corruption of their antagonists, they will increase their own force faster in proportion, than the force of the country party will increase by population. If then we must quarrel ere we can have our rights secured, now is the most eligible period. Our credit also is at stake; we must venture, and unless we do, we shall be discarded by the sons of liberty in the other colonies, whose assistance we may expect upon emergencies, in case they find us steady, resolute, and faithful."

[223] Mr. Gordon pointed out that the language used at this meeting shows that many people in Boston were already ready for revolution. To the more cautious members of "the sons of liberty" who had concerns about pushing too hard and getting the colony into a fight with Great Britain, others replied, "It will eventually come to a conflict between Great Britain and the colony, so why not now? It could take hundreds of years for Parliament to enact as many violations as they have recently, which has sparked such strong opposition to their policies. Plus, the longer we wait, the stronger the administration becomes. Don't you see how the government back home is boosting their influence here by sending over young guys to take positions, who then marry into our best families and dilute the opposition? By doing this, and by increasing posts and positions while rewarding their friends or corrupting their rivals, they will grow their influence faster than the local opposition will grow with population. So if we have to quarrel to secure our rights, now is the best time. Our reputation is also on the line; we have to take risks, or we will be abandoned by the sons of liberty in other colonies, whose support we might need in emergencies if they see us as steadfast, determined, and trustworthy."

[224] Mr. Quincy.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Quincy.

[225] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[226] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[227] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[228] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[229] Idem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same.

[230] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[231] Idem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Same thing.

[232] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[233] Belsham. Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham. Minot.

[234] Those of North Carolina arrived on the fourteenth.

[234] The people from North Carolina arrived on the fourteenth.

[235] See note No. VII, at the end of the volume.

[235] See note No. VII, at the end of the book.

[236] See note No. VIII, at the end of the volume.

[236] See note No. VIII, at the end of the book.

[237] See note No. IX, at the end of the volume.

[237] See note No. IX, at the end of the book.

[238] The committee which prepared this eloquent and manly address, were Mr. Lee, Mr. Livingston, and Mr. Jay. The composition has been generally attributed to Mr. Jay.

[238] The committee that prepared this powerful and dignified address consisted of Mr. Lee, Mr. Livingston, and Mr. Jay. The writing is commonly credited to Mr. Jay.

[239] The committee which brought in this admirably well drawn, and truly conciliatory address, were Mr. Lee, Mr. John Adams, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Henry, Mr. Rutledge, and Mr. Dickinson. The original composition has been generally attributed to Mr. Dickinson.

[239] The committee that presented this impressively written and genuinely conciliatory address included Mr. Lee, Mr. John Adams, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Henry, Mr. Rutledge, and Mr. Dickinson. The original work is usually credited to Mr. Dickinson.

[240] Mr. Lee, Mr. Livingston, and Mr. Jay, were also the committee who brought in this address.

[240] Mr. Lee, Mr. Livingston, and Mr. Jay were also the committee that presented this address.

[241] These letters, as well as that to the inhabitants of the province of Quebec, were prepared by Mr. Cushing, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Dickinson.

[241] These letters, along with the one addressed to the people of Quebec, were put together by Mr. Cushing, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Dickinson.

[242] Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Minot.

[243] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[244] Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Belsham.

[245] Prior documents. Minot.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Previous documents. Minot.

[246] The independent companies of the upper part of the northern neck, also assembled to the number of about six hundred men, and proceeded on horseback as far as Fredericksburg, when a council was held in which Richard Henry Lee, then on his way to congress, presided, which advised their return to their respective homes.

[246] The independent companies from the northern neck gathered around six hundred men and traveled on horseback to Fredericksburg, where a meeting took place led by Richard Henry Lee, who was en route to congress. They advised everyone to go back to their homes.

[247] Gordon.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gordon.

[248] Journals of congress.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Congressional journals.

[249] Artemus Ward of Massachusetts, then commanding the troops before Boston; Colonel Charles Lee, lately an officer in the British service; and Israel Putnam of Connecticut, were appointed major generals; Horatio Gates, who had held the rank of major in the British service, was appointed adjutant general.

[249] Artemus Ward of Massachusetts, who was leading the troops around Boston; Colonel Charles Lee, who had recently served in the British army; and Israel Putnam of Connecticut were appointed as major generals; Horatio Gates, who had been a major in the British service, was named adjutant general.

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

spines

spines

 

monument

monument

 

Site of Washington's Birthplace

Washington's Birthplace Site

Showing the monument erected by the United States Government to mark the house in which George Washington was born, February 22, 1732.

Here’s the monument set up by the U.S. Government to mark the house where George Washington was born on February 22, 1732.

 

THE

LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON,

COMMANDER IN CHIEF

OF THE

AMERICAN FORCES,

DURING THE WAR WHICH ESTABLISHED THE INDEPENDENCE OF HIS COUNTRY,

AND

FIRST PRESIDENT

OF THE

UNITED STATES.

COMPILED UNDER THE INSPECTION OF

THE HONOURABLE BUSHROD WASHINGTON,

FROM

ORIGINAL PAPERS

BEQUEATHED TO HIM BY HIS DECEASED RELATIVE, AND NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR.

TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,

AN INTRODUCTION,

CONTAINING A COMPENDIOUS VIEW OF THE COLONIES PLANTED BY THE ENGLISH ON THE

CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA,

FROM THEIR SETTLEMENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THAT WAR WHICH TERMINATED IN THEIR

INDEPENDENCE.

BY JOHN MARSHALL.

VOL. II.


THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

1926

Printed in the U.S.A.

Printed in the USA.

 

title page

title page

 

subscription

subscription


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French on the Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Capitulation of fort Necessity.... Is appointed aid-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Is appointed to the command of a regiment.... Extreme distress of the frontiers, and exertions of Colonel Washington to augment the regular forces of the colony.... Expedition against fort Du Quesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Du Quesne evacuated by the French, and taken possession of by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French on the Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Surrender of Fort Necessity.... Appointed aide-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Appointed to command a regiment.... Extreme distress on the frontiers, and Colonel Washington's efforts to increase the regular forces of the colony.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Duquesne abandoned by the French and taken over by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

CHAPTER II.

Colonel Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces.... Arrives at Cambridge.... Strength and disposition of the two armies.... Deficiency of the Americans in arms and ammunitions.... Falmouth burnt.... Success of the American cruisers.... Distress of the British from the want of fresh provisions.... Measures to form a continental army.... Difficulty of re-enlisting the troops.... Plan for attacking Boston.... General Lee detached to New York.... Possession taken of the heights of Dorchester.... Boston evacuated.... Correspondence respecting prisoners.

Colonel Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces.... Arrives at Cambridge.... Strength and location of the two armies.... Lack of arms and ammunition for the Americans.... Falmouth burned.... Success of the American ships.... The British struggle due to a shortage of fresh food.... Steps to create a continental army.... Challenges in re-enlisting the troops.... Strategy for attacking Boston.... General Lee sent to New York.... Control taken of the heights of Dorchester.... Boston evacuated.... Communication regarding prisoners.

CHAPTER III.

Invasion of Canada meditated.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's capitulated.... Montreal surrenders.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives before Quebec.... Retires to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.... Unsuccessful attack on that place.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes command of the army.... The blockade raised.... General Sullivan takes the command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada evacuated.... General Carleton constructs a fleet.... Enters lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes possession of Crown Point.... Retires into winter quarters.

Invasion of Canada planned.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of Fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's surrendered.... Montreal gives up.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives at Quebec.... Retreats to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery besieges Quebec.... Unsuccessful attack on the city.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes command of the army.... The blockade is lifted.... General Sullivan takes command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada evacuated.... General Carleton builds a fleet.... Enters Lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes control of Crown Point.... Retires to winter quarters.

CHAPTER IV.

Transaction in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet repulsed at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Measures leading to Independence.... Independence declared.

Transaction in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet pushed back at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Steps leading to Independence.... Independence declared.

CHAPTER V.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive before New York.... Circular letter of Lord Howe.... State of the American Army.... The British land in force on Long Island.... Battle of Brooklyn.... Evacuation of Long Island.... Fruitless negotiations.... New York evacuated.... Skirmish on the heights of Haerlem.... Letter on the state of the army.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive at New York.... Circular letter from Lord Howe.... Status of the American Army.... The British land in large numbers on Long Island.... Battle of Brooklyn.... Evacuation of Long Island.... Unsuccessful negotiations.... New York is evacuated.... Skirmish on the heights of Harlem.... Letter about the state of the army.

CHAPTER VI.

The British land at Frog's Neck.... The American army evacuates York Island, except fort Washington.... Both armies move towards the White Plains.... Battle of the White Plains.... The British army returns to Kingsbridge.... General Washington crosses the North river.... The lines of fort Washington carried by the British, and the garrison made prisoners.... Evacuation of fort Lee.... Weakness of the American army.... Ineffectual attempts to raise the militia.... General Washington retreats through Jersey.... General Washington crosses the Delaware.... Danger of Philadelphia.... Capture of General Lee.... The British go into winter quarters.... Battle of Trenton.... Of Princeton.... Firmness of congress.

The British land at Frog's Neck... The American army pulls out of York Island, except for Fort Washington... Both armies head toward the White Plains... Battle of the White Plains... The British army goes back to Kingsbridge... General Washington crosses the North River... The British take Fort Washington, and the garrison is captured... Evacuation of Fort Lee... Weakness of the American army... Unsuccessful attempts to gather the militia... General Washington retreats through New Jersey... General Washington crosses the Delaware... Threat to Philadelphia... Capture of General Lee... The British settle into winter quarters... Battle of Trenton... Of Princeton... Resolve of Congress.

CHAPTER VII.

American army inoculated.... General Heath moves to Kingsbridge.... Returns to Peekskill.... Skirmishes.... State of the army.... Destruction of stores at Peekskill.... At Danbury.... Expedition to Sagg Harbour.... Camp formed at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Attempts to cut off the retreat of the American army to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis skirmishes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescott surprised and taken.... The British army embarks.

American army vaccinated.... General Heath heads to Kingsbridge.... Returns to Peekskill.... Skirmishes.... Condition of the army.... Destruction of supplies at Peekskill.... At Danbury.... Mission to Sagg Harbour.... Camp set up at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Tries to block the American army's retreat to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis skirmishes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescott is caught off guard and captured.... The British army embarks.

CHAPTER VIII.

General Washington commences his march to the Delaware.... Takes measures for checking Burgoyne.... British army land at Elk River.... General Washington advances to Brandywine.... Retreat of Maxwell.... Defeat at Brandywine.... Slight skirmish near the White Horse, and retreat to French Creek.... General Wayne surprised.... General Howe takes possession of Philadelphia.... Removal of Congress to Lancaster.

General Washington begins his march to the Delaware.... Takes steps to stop Burgoyne.... British army lands at Elk River.... General Washington moves to Brandywine.... Retreat of Maxwell.... Defeat at Brandywine.... Minor skirmish near the White Horse, and retreat to French Creek.... General Wayne is caught off guard.... General Howe takes control of Philadelphia.... Congress is moved to Lancaster.

CHAPTER IX.

Measures to cut off the communication between the British army and fleet.... Battle of Germantown.... Measures to intercept supplies to Philadelphia.... Attack on fort Mifflin.... On Red Bank.... The Augusta blows up.... Fort Mifflin evacuated.... Fort Mercer evacuated.... The British open the communication with their fleet.... Washington urged to attack Philadelphia.... General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill.... Returns to Philadelphia.... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

Measures to cut off communication between the British army and fleet... Battle of Germantown... Efforts to intercept supplies to Philadelphia... Attack on Fort Mifflin... At Red Bank... The Augusta explodes... Fort Mifflin is evacuated... Fort Mercer is evacuated... The British establish communication with their fleet... Washington is urged to attack Philadelphia... General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill... Returns to Philadelphia... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

CHAPTER X.

Inquiry into the conduct of General Schuyler.... Burgoyne appears before Ticonderoga.... Evacuation of that place,... of Skeensborough.... Colonel Warner defeated.... Evacuation of fort Anne.... Proclamation of Burgoyne.... Counter-proclamation of Schuyler.... Burgoyne approaches fort Edward.... Schuyler retires to Saratoga,... to Stillwater.... St. Leger invests fort Schuyler.... Herkimer defeated.... Colonel Baum detached to Bennington.... is defeated.... Brechman defeated.... St. Leger abandons the siege of fort Schuyler.... Murder of Miss M'Crea.... General Gates takes command.... Burgoyne encamps on the heights of Saratoga.... Battle of Stillwater.... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga.... Capitulates.... The British take forts Montgomery and Clinton.... The forts Independence and Constitution evacuated by the Americans.... Ticonderoga evacuated by the British.

Inquiry into General Schuyler's actions... Burgoyne shows up at Ticonderoga... that place is evacuated... Skeensborough is also evacuated... Colonel Warner is defeated... Fort Anne is evacuated... Burgoyne issues a proclamation... Schuyler counters with his own proclamation... Burgoyne moves closer to Fort Edward... Schuyler withdraws to Saratoga... then to Stillwater... St. Leger surrounds Fort Schuyler... Herkimer is defeated... Colonel Baum is sent to Bennington... he is defeated... Brechman is defeated... St. Leger gives up the siege of Fort Schuyler... Miss M'Crea is murdered... General Gates takes command... Burgoyne sets up camp on the heights of Saratoga... Battle of Stillwater occurs... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga... he surrenders... The British seize Forts Montgomery and Clinton... the Americans evacuate Forts Independence and Constitution... the British evacuate Ticonderoga.

CHAPTER XI.

Defects in the Commissary departments.... Distress of the army at Valley Forge.... The army subsisted by impressments.... Combination in congress against General Washington.... Correspondence between him and General Gates.... Distress of the army for clothes.... Washington's exertions to augment the army.... Congress sends a committee to camp.... Attempt to surprise Captain Lee.... Congress determines on a second expedition to Canada.... Abandons it.... General Conway resigns.... The Baron Steuben appointed Inspector General.... Congress forbids the embarkation of Burgoyne's army.... Plan of reconciliation agreed to in Parliament.... Communicated to congress and rejected.... Information of treaties between France and the United States.... Complaints of the treatment of prisoners.... A partial exchange agreed to.

Defects in the Commissary departments... Distress of the army at Valley Forge... The army survived through impressments... A conspiracy in Congress against General Washington... Correspondence between him and General Gates... The army's struggle for clothing... Washington's efforts to strengthen the army... Congress sends a committee to the camp... An attempt to surprise Captain Lee... Congress decides on a second expedition to Canada... They abandon it... General Conway resigns... The Baron Steuben is appointed Inspector General... Congress prohibits the embarkation of Burgoyne's army... A plan for reconciliation agreed upon in Parliament... Communicated to Congress and rejected... Information on treaties between France and the United States... Complaints about the treatment of prisoners... A limited exchange agreed upon.

NOTES

Footnotes


ILLUSTRATIONS

Wakefield—the Birthplace of George Washington

The Washington Family Burial Ground

The Historic Washington Elm at Cambridge, Massachusetts

Independence Hall, Philadelphia

Washington's Headquarters at White Plains

Washington Crossing the Delaware

The Saratoga Battle Monument

Washington's Headquarters at Valley Forge


THE LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON


CHAPTER I.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French on the Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Capitulation of fort Necessity.... Is appointed aid-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Is appointed to the command of a regiment.... Extreme distress of the frontiers, and exertions of Colonel Washington to augment the regular forces of the colony.... Expedition against fort Du Quesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Du Quesne evacuated by the French, and taken possession of by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

Birth of Mr. Washington.... His mission to the French in Ohio.... Appointed Lieutenant Colonel of a regiment of regular troops.... Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.... Surrender of Fort Necessity.... Appointed aid-de-camp to General Braddock.... Defeat and death of that general.... Appointed to command a regiment.... Severe distress on the frontiers, and efforts of Colonel Washington to increase the regular forces of the colony.... Expedition against Fort Duquesne.... Defeat of Major Grant.... Fort Duquesne evacuated by the French and taken over by the English.... Resignation of Colonel Washington.... His marriage.

 

1732
Birth of Mr. Washington.

George Washington, the third son of Augustine Washington, was born on the 22d of February, 1732, near the banks of the Potowmac, in the county of Westmoreland, in Virginia. His father first married Miss Butler, who died in 1728; leaving two sons, Lawrence and Augustine. In 1730, he intermarried with Miss Mary Ball, by whom he had four sons, George, John, Samuel and Charles; and one daughter, Betty, who intermarried with Colonel Fielding Lewis, of Fredericksburg.

George Washington, the third son of Augustine Washington, was born on February 22, 1732, near the Potomac River in Westmoreland County, Virginia. His father first married Miss Butler, who passed away in 1728, leaving behind two sons, Lawrence and Augustine. In 1730, he married Miss Mary Ball, with whom he had four sons: George, John, Samuel, and Charles; and one daughter, Betty, who married Colonel Fielding Lewis of Fredericksburg.

His great grandfather, John Washington, a gentleman of a respectable family, had emigrated from the north of England about the year 1657, and settled on the place where Mr. Washington was born.

His great-grandfather, John Washington, a gentleman from a respectable family, had moved from the north of England around 1657 and settled in the area where Mr. Washington was born.

At the age of ten years he lost his father. Deprived of one parent, he became an object of more assiduous attention to the other; who continued to impress those principles of religion and virtue on his tender mind, which constituted the solid basis of a character that was maintained through all the trying vicissitudes of an eventful life. But his education was limited to those subjects, in which alone the sons of gentlemen, of moderate fortune, were, at that time, generally instructed. It was confined to acquisitions strictly useful, not even extending to foreign languages.

At the age of ten, he lost his father. With one parent gone, he became the focus of more dedicated attention from his remaining parent, who continued to instill principles of religion and virtue in his young mind, forming the solid foundation of a character that endured through all the challenges of a busy life. However, his education was limited to the subjects that sons of gentlemen with moderate means were typically taught at that time. It focused only on practical knowledge, not even including foreign languages.

In 1743, his eldest brother intermarried with the daughter of the Honourable George William Fairfax, then a member of the council; and this connexion introduced Mr. Washington to Lord Fairfax, the proprietor of the Northern Neck of Virginia, who offered him, when in his eighteenth year, an appointment as surveyor, in the western part of that territory. His patrimonial estate being inconsiderable, this appointment was readily accepted; and in the performance of its duties, he acquired that information respecting vacant lands, and formed those opinions concerning their future value, which afterwards contributed greatly to the increase of his private fortune.

In 1743, his oldest brother married the daughter of the Honorable George William Fairfax, who was a member of the council at the time. This connection introduced Mr. Washington to Lord Fairfax, the owner of the Northern Neck of Virginia, who offered him a position as a surveyor in the western part of that area when he was eighteen. Since his family estate was quite small, he gladly accepted the appointment. By carrying out his duties, he gained valuable knowledge about unclaimed lands and developed ideas about their future value, which later played a significant role in increasing his personal wealth.

1750

Those powerful attractions which the profession of arms presents to young and ardent minds, possessed their full influence over Mr. Washington. Stimulated by the enthusiasm of military genius, to take part in the war in which Great Britain was then engaged, he had pressed so earnestly to enter into the navy, that, at the age of fifteen, a midshipman's warrant was obtained for him. The interference of a timid and affectionate mother deferred the commencement, and changed the direction of his military career. Four years afterwards, at a time when the militia were to be trained for actual service, he was appointed one of the Adjutants General of Virginia, with the rank of Major. The duties annexed to this office soon yielded to others of a more interesting character.

Those strong attractions that a military career offers to young and passionate individuals had a significant impact on Mr. Washington. Inspired by the excitement of military talent and wanting to join the war that Great Britain was involved in, he worked hard to get into the navy, and at fifteen, he received a midshipman's warrant. However, his cautious and loving mother delayed the start of his journey and changed the course of his military path. Four years later, when the militia was getting ready for actual service, he was appointed one of the Adjutants General of Virginia, with the rank of Major. The responsibilities that came with this role quickly gave way to others that were more engaging.

France was beginning to develop the vast plan of connecting her extensive dominions in America, by uniting Canada with Louisiana. The troops of that nation had taken possession of a tract of country claimed by Virginia, and had commenced a line of posts, to be extended from the Lakes to the Ohio. The attention of Mr. Dinwiddie, Lieutenant Governor of that Province, was attracted to these supposed encroachments; and he deemed it his duty to demand, in the name of the King his master, that they should be suspended.

France was starting to come up with a big plan to connect its large territories in America by joining Canada with Louisiana. The troops from that nation had taken over an area that Virginia claimed and had started building a line of forts that would stretch from the Great Lakes to the Ohio River. Mr. Dinwiddie, the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, noticed these supposed invasions and felt it was his responsibility to demand, on behalf of the King, that they should stop.

1753

This mission was toilsome and hazardous. The Envoy would be under the necessity of passing through an extensive and almost unexplored wilderness, intersected with rugged mountains and considerable rivers, and inhabited by fierce savages, who were either hostile to the English, or of doubtful attachment. While the dangers and fatigues of this service deterred others from undertaking it, they seem to have possessed attractions for Mr. Washington, and he engaged in it with alacrity.

This mission was tough and dangerous. The Envoy would have to navigate through a vast and nearly uncharted wilderness, crossed by rough mountains and significant rivers, and populated by fierce natives who were either hostile to the English or had uncertain loyalties. While the risks and hardships of this task discouraged others from taking it on, they seemed to appeal to Mr. Washington, and he took it on eagerly.

October 31.
His mission to the French on the Ohio.

On receiving his commission, he left Williamsburg and arrived, on the 14th of November, at Wills' creek, then the extreme frontier settlement of the English, where guides were engaged to conduct him over the Alleghany mountains. After surmounting the impediments occasioned by the snow and high waters, he reached the mouth of Turtle creek, where he was informed that the French General was dead, and that the greater part of the army had retired into winter quarters. Pursuing his route, he examined the country through which he passed with a military eye, and selected the confluence of the Monongahela and Alleghany rivers, the place where fort Du Quesne was afterwards erected by the French, as an advantageous position, which it would be adviseable to seize and to fortify immediately.

Upon receiving his commission, he left Williamsburg and arrived at Wills' Creek on November 14th, which was then the farthest English settlement on the frontier. There, he hired guides to take him over the Allegheny Mountains. After overcoming the challenges posed by snow and high water levels, he reached the mouth of Turtle Creek, where he learned that the French General had died and most of the army had gone into winter quarters. Continuing his journey, he surveyed the land with a military perspective and identified the spot where the Monongahela and Allegheny rivers meet, the future site of Fort Duquesne built by the French, as a strategic location that should be captured and fortified immediately.

1754

After employing a few days among the Indians in that neighbourhood, and procuring some of their chiefs to accompany him, whose fidelity he took the most judicious means to secure, he ascended the Alleghany river. Passing one fort at the mouth of French creek, he proceeded up the stream to a second, where he was received by Monsieur Le Gardeur de St. Pierre, the commanding officer on the Ohio, to whom he delivered the letter of Mr. Dinwiddie, and from whom he received an answer with which he returned to Williamsburg. January 16.The exertions made by Mr. Washington on this occasion, the perseverance with which he surmounted the difficulties of the journey, and the judgment displayed in his conduct towards the Indians, raised him in the public opinion, as well as in that of the Lieutenant Governor. His journal,[1] drawn up for the inspection of Mr. Dinwiddie, was published, and impressed his countrymen with very favourable sentiments of his understanding and fortitude.

After spending a few days with the local Native Americans and securing the loyalty of some of their chiefs, he traveled up the Alleghany River. After passing one fort at the mouth of French Creek, he continued upstream to a second fort, where he was welcomed by Monsieur Le Gardeur de St. Pierre, the commanding officer on the Ohio. He delivered Mr. Dinwiddie's letter and received a response, which he took back to Williamsburg. January 16th. The efforts Mr. Washington made during this time, his determination to overcome the challenges of the journey, and his careful approach to dealing with the Native Americans impressed both the public and the Lieutenant Governor. His journal,[1] prepared for Mr. Dinwiddie's review, was published and left his fellow countrymen with a very positive impression of his wisdom and courage.

Appointed lieutenant colonel of a regiment of regular troops.

As the answer from the commandant of the French forces on the Ohio indicated no disposition to withdraw from that country, it was deemed necessary to make some preparations to maintain the right asserted over it by the British crown; and the assembly of Virginia authorized the executive to raise a regiment for that purpose, to consist of three hundred men. The command of this regiment was given to Mr. Fry,[2] and Major Washington was appointed Lieutenant Colonel. Anxious to be engaged in active service, he obtained permission, about the beginning of April, to advance with two companies to the Great Meadows in the Alleghany mountains. By this movement he hoped to cover that frontier, to make himself more perfectly acquainted with the country, to gain some information respecting the situation and designs of the French, and to preserve the friendship of the savages. Soon after his arrival at that place, he was visited by some friendly Indians, who informed him that the French, having dispersed a party of workmen employed by the Ohio company to erect a fort on the south-eastern branch of the Ohio, were themselves engaged in completing a fortification at the confluence of the Alleghany and Monongahela rivers: a detachment from which place was then on its march towards his camp. Open hostilities had not yet commenced; but the country was considered as invaded: and several circumstances were related, confirming the opinion that this party was approaching with hostile views. Among others, it had withdrawn itself some distance from the path, and had encamped for the night in a bottom, as if to ensure concealment. Entertaining no doubt of the unfriendly designs with which these troops were advancing, Lieutenant Colonel Washington resolved to anticipate them. Surprises Monsieur Jumonville.Availing himself of the offer made by the Indians to serve him as guides, he proceeded through a dark and rainy night to the French encampment, which he completely surrounded. At day-break, his troops fired and rushed upon the party, which immediately surrendered. One man only escaped capture, and M. Jumonville alone, the commanding officer, was killed.

As the response from the commandant of the French forces in Ohio showed no intention of withdrawing from that area, it was necessary to make some preparations to uphold the British crown's claim over it. The Virginia assembly authorized the executive to raise a regiment for this purpose, consisting of three hundred men. Mr. Fry was given command of this regiment, and Major Washington was appointed Lieutenant Colonel. Eager to engage in active service, he obtained permission around the beginning of April to advance with two companies to the Great Meadows in the Allegheny Mountains. With this move, he aimed to protect that frontier, familiarize himself with the terrain, gather information about the French's situation and plans, and maintain goodwill with the local Native Americans. Shortly after arriving there, he was visited by some friendly Indians who informed him that the French had dispersed a group of workers from the Ohio Company who were building a fort on the southeastern branch of the Ohio and were themselves completing a fortification at the meeting point of the Allegheny and Monongahela rivers. A detachment from that location was then marching towards his camp. Although open hostilities hadn't started yet, the area was considered invaded, and several factors indicated that this party was approaching with hostile intentions. Notably, they had moved off the main path and camped for the night in a secluded spot, likely to remain hidden. Having no doubt about the unfriendly motives of these advancing troops, Lieutenant Colonel Washington decided to take action first. Surprises Mr. Jumonville. Taking advantage of the offer from the Indians to guide him, he moved through a dark and rainy night to the French encampment, which he completely surrounded. At dawn, his troops fired and charged the party, which quickly surrendered. Only one man escaped capture, and M. Jumonville, the commanding officer, was killed.

While the regiment was on its march to join the detachment advanced in front, the command devolved on Lieutenant Colonel Washington by the death of Colonel Fry. Soon after its arrival, it was reinforced by two independent companies of regulars. After erecting a small stockade at the Great Meadows, Colonel Washington commenced his march towards fort Du Quesne, with the intention of dislodging the French from that place. He had proceeded about thirteen miles, when he was met by some friendly Indians, who informed him that the French and their savage allies, "as numerous as the pigeons in the woods," were advancing rapidly to meet him. Among those who brought this information was a trusty chief, only two days from the fort on the Ohio, who had observed the arrival of a considerable reinforcement at that place, and had heard their intention of marching immediately to attack the English, with a corps composed of eight hundred French and four hundred Indians. This intelligence was corroborated by information previously received from deserters, who had reported that a reinforcement was expected.

While the regiment was marching to join the detachment ahead, the command fell to Lieutenant Colonel Washington after Colonel Fry's death. Shortly after their arrival, they were joined by two independent companies of regulars. After setting up a small stockade at the Great Meadows, Colonel Washington began his march toward Fort Du Quesne, aiming to drive the French out of that area. He had traveled about thirteen miles when he encountered some friendly Indians who warned him that the French and their Indian allies, "as numerous as the pigeons in the woods," were quickly advancing towards him. Among those delivering this news was a reliable chief who had just come from the fort on the Ohio, where he had noticed a significant reinforcement arriving and had heard their plans to march immediately to attack the English with a force of eight hundred French and four hundred Indians. This information was supported by earlier reports from deserters who had indicated that a reinforcement was expected.

The troops commanded by Colonel Washington were almost destitute of provisions; and the ground he occupied was not adapted to military purposes. A road at some distance, leading through other defiles in the mountains, would enable the French to pass into his rear, intercept his supplies, and starve him into a surrender, or fight him with a superiority of three to one.

The troops led by Colonel Washington were nearly out of supplies, and the area he was in wasn't suitable for military operations. A road not too far away, going through other gaps in the mountains, could allow the French to get behind him, cut off his supplies, and force him to surrender or fight him with triple their numbers.

June 23.

In this hazardous situation, a council of war unanimously advised a retreat to the fort at the Great Meadows, now termed fort Necessity; where the two roads united, and where the face of the country was such as not to permit an enemy to pass unperceived. At that place, it was intended to remain, until reinforcements of men, and supplies of provisions, should arrive.

In this dangerous situation, a war council unanimously recommended retreating to the fort at the Great Meadows, now called Fort Necessity; where the two roads met, and where the terrain was such that an enemy couldn't pass unnoticed. There, it was planned to stay until reinforcements and supplies arrived.

July 2.
Capitulation of fort Necessity.

In pursuance of this advice, Colonel Washington returned to fort Necessity, and began a ditch around the stockade. Before it was completed, the French, amounting to about fifteen hundred men, commanded by Monsieur de Villier, appeared before the fort, Third.and immediately commenced a furious attack upon it. They were received with great intrepidity by the Americans, who fought partly within the stockade, and partly in the surrounding ditch, which was nearly filled with mud and water. Colonel Washington continued the whole day on the outside of the fort, encouraging the soldiers by his countenance and example. The assailants fought under cover of the trees and high grass, with which the country abounds. The engagement was continued with great resolution from ten in the morning until dark; when Monsieur de Villier demanded a parley, and offered terms of capitulation. Fourth.The proposals first made were rejected; but, in the course of the night, articles were signed, by which the fort was surrendered, on condition that its garrison should be allowed the honours of war—should be permitted to retain their arms and baggage, and be suffered to march without molestation into the inhabited parts of Virginia. The capitulation being in French—a language not understood by any person in the garrison, and being drawn up hastily in the night, contains an expression which was inaccurately translated at the time, and of which advantage has been since taken, by the enemies of Mr. Washington, to imply an admission on his part, that Monsieur Jumonville was assassinated. An account of the transaction was published by Monsieur de Villier, which drew from Colonel Washington a letter to a friend, completely disproving the calumny. Though entirely discredited at the time, it was revived at a subsequent period, when circumstances, well understood at the date of the transaction, were supposed to be forgotten.[3]

In line with this advice, Colonel Washington returned to Fort Necessity and began digging a trench around the stockade. Before it was finished, the French, numbering around fifteen hundred men and led by Monsieur de Villier, appeared in front of the fort, Third. and immediately launched a fierce attack. The Americans responded with great bravery, fighting both within the stockade and in the muddy, water-filled ditch surrounding it. Colonel Washington spent the entire day outside the fort, encouraging the soldiers with his presence and example. The attackers fought from behind the trees and tall grass that filled the area. The battle continued fiercely from ten in the morning until dark, when Monsieur de Villier called for a ceasefire and offered terms of surrender. Fourth. The initial proposals were rejected, but later that night, terms were signed that allowed the fort to surrender on the condition that its garrison would receive honors of war, be allowed to keep their arms and belongings, and be permitted to march without interference into the inhabited areas of Virginia. The capitulation was written in French—a language that no one in the garrison understood—and was hastily prepared at night, containing a phrase that was inaccurately translated at the time. This has since been used by Mr. Washington's enemies to suggest that he admitted to the assassination of Monsieur Jumonville. An account of the incident was published by Monsieur de Villier, prompting Colonel Washington to write a letter to a friend that completely refuted the accusation. Although it was entirely discredited at the time, the claim was revived later when circumstances that were well known at the time of the event were assumed to be forgotten.[3]

The loss of the Americans in this affair is not ascertained. From a return made on the 9th of July, at Wills' Creek, it appears that the killed and wounded, of the Virginia regiment, amounted to fifty-eight; but the loss sustained by the two independent companies is not stated. That of the assailants was supposed to be more considerable.

The number of Americans lost in this situation is unknown. A report from July 9th at Wills' Creek shows that the Virginia regiment had fifty-eight killed and wounded, but the losses from the two independent companies aren't mentioned. The attackers are believed to have had even greater losses.

Great credit was given to Colonel Washington by his countrymen, for the courage displayed on this occasion. The legislature evinced its satisfaction with the conduct of the whole party, by passing a vote of thanks[4] to him, and the officers under his command; and by giving three hundred pistoles, to be distributed among the soldiers engaged in the action.

Great credit was given to Colonel Washington by his fellow countrymen for the courage he showed during this situation. The legislature expressed its satisfaction with the actions of the entire group by passing a vote of thanks[4] to him and the officers under his command, and by awarding three hundred pistoles to be shared among the soldiers involved in the fight.

The regiment returned to Winchester, to be recruited; soon after which it was joined by a few companies from North Carolina and Maryland. On the arrival of this reinforcement, the Lieutenant Governor, with the advice of council, regardless of the condition or number of the forces, ordered them immediately to march over the Alleghany mountains, and to expel the French from fort Du Quesne, or to build one in its vicinity.

The regiment returned to Winchester to regroup; shortly after, it was joined by a few companies from North Carolina and Maryland. When this reinforcement arrived, the Lieutenant Governor, with the council's advice, ordered them to immediately march over the Alleghany Mountains to drive the French out of Fort Du Quesne or to build a fort nearby, without considering the condition or number of the forces.

August.

The little army in Virginia, which was placed under the command of Colonel Innes, from North Carolina, did not, as now reinforced, exceed half the number of the enemy, and was neither provided with the means of moving, nor with supplies for a winter campaign. With as little consideration, directions had been given for the immediate completion of the regiment, without furnishing a single shilling for the recruiting service. Although a long peace may account for many errors at the commencement of war, some surprise will be felt at such ill-considered and ill-judged measures. September.Colonel Washington remonstrated strongly against these orders, but prepared to execute them. The assembly, however, having risen without making any provision for the farther prosecution of the war, this wild expedition was laid aside, and the Virginia regiment was reduced to independent companies.

The small army in Virginia, led by Colonel Innes from North Carolina, was not, even with reinforcements, more than half the size of the enemy and lacked both the means to move and supplies for a winter campaign. Without much thought, orders were given to quickly complete the regiment, but not a single cent was provided for recruitment. While a long peace might explain many mistakes at the start of a war, it’s surprising to see such poorly thought-out and misguided actions. September. Colonel Washington strongly opposed these orders but prepared to follow them. However, the assembly ended its session without making any plans for continuing the war, so this reckless expedition was abandoned, and the Virginia regiment was reduced to independent companies.

In the course of the winter, orders were received "for settling the rank of the officers of his majesty's forces when serving with the provincials in North America." These orders directed "that all officers commissioned by the King, or by his General in North America, should take rank of all officers commissioned by the Governors of the respective provinces; and farther, that the general and field officers of the provincial troops should have no rank when serving with the general and field officers commissioned by the crown; but that all captains, and other inferior officers of the royal troops, should take rank over provincial officers of the same grade, having senior commissions."

During the winter, orders were received "for determining the rank of the officers in His Majesty's forces when working with the provincial troops in North America." These orders specified "that all officers commissioned by the King or by his General in North America should outrank all officers commissioned by the Governors of the respective provinces; furthermore, that the general and field officers of the provincial troops would have no rank when serving alongside the general and field officers commissioned by the crown; however, all captains and other lower-ranked officers of the royal troops should outrank provincial officers of the same level, provided they had earlier commissions."

Strong as was his attachment to a military life, Colonel Washington possessed in too eminent a degree the proud and punctilious feelings of a soldier, to submit to a degradation so humiliating as was produced by his loss of rank. Professing his unabated inclination to continue in the service, if permitted to do so without a sacrifice too great to be made, he retired indignantly from the station assigned him, and answered the various letters which he received, pressing him still to hold his commission, with assurances that he would serve with pleasure, when he should be enabled to do so without dishonour.

As much as Colonel Washington loved military life, he had too much pride and a strong sense of duty to accept the humiliating blow of losing his rank. While he expressed his desire to stay in service if it didn’t require too great a sacrifice, he left the position he was given in anger. He responded to the many letters urging him to keep his commission, assuring them that he would be happy to serve again when he could do so without compromising his honor.

His eldest brother had lately died, and left him a considerable estate on the Potowmac. This gentleman had served in the expedition against Carthagena; and, in compliment to the admiral who commanded the fleet engaged in that enterprise, had named his seat Mount Vernon! To this delightful spot Colonel Washington withdrew, resolving to devote his future attention to the avocations of private life. This resolution was not long maintained.

His older brother had recently passed away and left him a large estate on the Potomac. This man had served in the campaign against Cartagena, and in honor of the admiral who led the fleet in that mission, he named his property Mount Vernon! To this beautiful place, Colonel Washington retreated, deciding to focus on private life from that point on. However, this decision didn’t last long.

1755
March.

General Braddock, being informed of his merit, his knowledge of the country which was to be the theatre of action, and his motives for retiring from the service, gratified his desire to make one campaign under a person supposed to possess some knowledge of war, by inviting him to enter his family as a volunteer aid-de-camp.

General Braddock, aware of his skills, his understanding of the area designated for action, and his reasons for stepping back from service, fulfilled his wish to serve one campaign under someone believed to have some military knowledge by inviting him to join his staff as a volunteer aide-de-camp.

Is appointed aid-de-camp to General Braddock.
April.

Having determined to accept this invitation, he joined the commander-in-chief, immediately after his departure from Alexandria, and proceeded with him to Wills' Creek. The army, consisting of two European regiments and a few corps of provincials, was detained at that place until the 12th of June, by the difficulty of procuring wagons, horses, and provisions. Colonel Washington, impatient under these delays, suggested the propriety of using pack-horses instead of wagons, for conveying the baggage. June.The commander-in-chief, although solicitous to hasten the expedition, was so attached to the usages of regular war, that this salutary advice was at first rejected; but, soon after the commencement of the march, its propriety became too obvious to be longer neglected.

Having decided to accept this invitation, he joined the commander-in-chief right after leaving Alexandria and went with him to Wills' Creek. The army, made up of two European regiments and a few provincial corps, was stuck there until June 12th due to difficulties in getting wagons, horses, and supplies. Colonel Washington, frustrated with these delays, suggested it would be better to use pack-horses instead of wagons for transporting the baggage. June. The commander-in-chief, although eager to speed up the mission, was so committed to traditional military practices that he initially dismissed this helpful suggestion; however, shortly after the march began, it became clear that the idea was too useful to ignore.

Fifteenth.

On the third day after the army had moved from its ground, Colonel Washington was seized with a violent fever, which disabled him from riding on horseback, and was conveyed in a covered wagon. General Braddock, who found the difficulties of the march greater than had been expected, continuing to consult him privately, he strenuously urged that officer to leave his heavy artillery and baggage with the rear division of the army; and with a chosen body of troops and some pieces of light artillery, to press forward with the utmost expedition to fort Du Quesne. In support of this advice, he stated that the French were then weak on the Ohio, but hourly expected reinforcements. During the excessive drought which prevailed at that time, these could not arrive; because the river Le Boeuf, on which their supplies must be brought to Venango, did not then afford a sufficient quantity of water for the purpose. A rapid movement therefore might enable him to carry the fort, before the arrival of the expected aid; but if this measure should not be adopted, such were the delays attendant on the march of the whole army, that rains sufficient to raise the waters might reasonably be expected, and the whole force of the French would probably be collected for their reception; a circumstance which would render the success of the expedition doubtful.

On the third day after the army had moved from its camp, Colonel Washington was struck with a severe fever that prevented him from riding a horse, so he was transported in a covered wagon. General Braddock, who found the challenges of the march greater than expected, continued to seek his advice privately. Washington strongly urged Braddock to leave the heavy artillery and baggage with the rear division of the army and to advance quickly toward Fort Du Quesne with a select group of troops and some light artillery. He argued that the French were weak in the Ohio region at that time, but were expecting reinforcements. However, due to the extreme drought that was occurring, those reinforcements could not arrive, as the river Le Boeuf, which was necessary for bringing supplies to Venango, was not providing enough water for that purpose. Therefore, a swift move could allow them to capture the fort before the anticipated reinforcements showed up. If this strategy was not implemented, the delays associated with moving the entire army made it likely that rain, sufficient to raise the water levels, would come, and the full strength of the French forces would likely be gathered to counter them, making the success of the expedition uncertain.

This advice according well with the temper of the commander-in-chief, it was determined in a council of war, held at the Little Meadows, that twelve hundred select men, to be commanded by General Braddock in person, should advance with the utmost expedition against fort Du Quesne. Colonel Dunbar was to remain with the residue of the two regiments, and all the heavy baggage.

This advice matched the attitude of the commander-in-chief, so it was decided in a council of war held at the Little Meadows that twelve hundred chosen men, led by General Braddock himself, would advance as quickly as possible against Fort Du Quesne. Colonel Dunbar would stay behind with the rest of the two regiments and all the heavy baggage.

June 19.

Although this select corps commenced its march with only thirty carriages, including ammunition wagons, the hopes which had been entertained of the celerity of its movements were not fulfilled. "I found," said Colonel Washington, in a letter to his brother, written during the march, "that instead of pushing on with vigour, without regarding a little rough road, they were halting to level every mole-hill, and to erect bridges over every brook." By these means they employed four days in reaching the great crossings of the Yohiogany, only nineteen miles from the Little Meadows.

Although this group started its march with just thirty vehicles, including ammunition trucks, the expectations for how quickly they would move were not met. "I found," Colonel Washington wrote in a letter to his brother during the march, "that instead of moving forward energetically and ignoring a bit of rough terrain, they were stopping to flatten every small bump and build bridges over every stream." Because of this, it took them four days to reach the main crossings of the Yohiogany, which was only nineteen miles from the Little Meadows.

Colonel Washington was obliged to stop at that place;—the physician having declared that his life would be endangered by continuing with the army. He obeyed, with reluctance, the positive orders of the general to remain at this camp, under the protection of a small guard, until the arrival of Colonel Dunbar; having first received a promise that means should be used to bring him up with the army before it reached fort Du Quesne.

Colonel Washington had to stop at that location; the doctor had warned that his life would be at risk if he continued with the army. He reluctantly followed the general's strict orders to stay at this camp, under the protection of a small guard, until Colonel Dunbar arrived; he first made sure there would be efforts to get him back with the army before it reached Fort Du Quesne.

July 8.

The day before the action of the Monongahela he rejoined the general in a covered wagon; and, though weak, entered on the duties of his station.

The day before the battle at Monongahela, he rejoined the general in a covered wagon; and, even though he was weak, he started his duties.

In a short time after the action had commenced, Colonel Washington was the only aid remaining alive, and unwounded. The whole duty of carrying the orders of the commander-in-chief, in an engagement with marksmen who selected officers, and especially those on horseback, for their objects, devolved on him alone. Under these difficult circumstances, he manifested that coolness, that self-possession, that fearlessness of danger which ever distinguished him, and which are so necessary to the character of a consummate soldier. Two horses were killed under him, and four balls passed through his coat; but, to the astonishment of all, he escaped unhurt,—while every other officer on horseback was either killed or wounded. "I expected every moment," says an eye-witness,[5] "to see him fall. His duty and situation exposed him to every danger. Nothing but the superintending care of Providence could have saved him from the fate of all around him."

In a short time after the action began, Colonel Washington was the only aid left who was alive and not injured. The entire responsibility of delivering orders from the commander-in-chief during a battle with marksmen, who targeted officers—especially those on horseback—fell solely on him. Despite these tough conditions, he demonstrated the coolness, composure, and fearless attitude that always set him apart, and which are essential traits for a great soldier. Two horses were shot under him, and four bullets went through his coat; yet, to everyone's surprise, he remained unscathed—while every other officer on horseback was either killed or wounded. "I expected every moment," says an eye-witness,[5] "to see him fall. His duty and situation put him in harm's way. Only the protective care of Providence could have kept him safe from the fate of those around him."

Defeat and death of that general.
August.

At length, after an action of nearly three hours, General Braddock, under whom three horses had been killed, received a mortal wound; and his troops fled in great disorder. Every effort to rally them was ineffectual until they had crossed the Monongahela, when, being no longer pursued, they were again formed. The general was brought off in a small tumbril by Colonel Washington, Captain Stewart of the guards, and his servant. The defeated detachment retreated with the utmost precipitation to the rear division of the army; soon after which, Braddock expired. In the first moments of alarm, all the stores were destroyed, except those necessary for immediate use; and not long afterwards, Colonel Dunbar marched the remaining European troops to Philadelphia, in order to place them in, what he termed, winter quarters.

At last, after almost three hours of fighting, General Braddock, who had lost three horses, took a fatal injury, and his troops scattered in chaos. Every attempt to regroup them failed until they had crossed the Monongahela, where, no longer being chased, they formed up again. Colonel Washington, Captain Stewart of the guards, and his servant carried the general away in a small cart. The defeated unit rushed back to the rear division of the army, shortly after which Braddock passed away. In the initial moments of panic, all supplies were destroyed except for what was needed right away; soon after, Colonel Dunbar marched the remaining European troops to Philadelphia to put them into what he called winter quarters.

Colonel Washington was greatly disappointed and disgusted by the conduct of the regular troops in this action. In his letter to Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie, giving an account of it, he said, "They were struck with such an inconceivable panic, that nothing but confusion and disobedience of orders prevailed among them. The officers in general behaved with incomparable bravery, for which they greatly suffered; there being upwards of sixty killed and wounded—a large proportion out of what we had.

Colonel Washington was really disappointed and disgusted by how the regular troops acted during this action. In his letter to Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie, where he described it, he said, "They were hit with such an unbelievable panic that all we saw was confusion and disobedience of orders among them. The officers, on the whole, acted with incredible bravery, for which they paid a heavy price; there were more than sixty killed and wounded—a significant number relative to our total."

"The Virginia companies behaved like men, and died like soldiers; for, I believe, out of three companies on the ground that day, scarce thirty men were left alive. Captain Peronny, and all his officers down to a corporal, were killed. Captain Poulson had almost as hard a fate, for only one of his escaped. In short, the dastardly behaviour of the regular troops (so called,) exposed those who were inclined to do their duty, to almost certain death; and, at length, in spite of every effort to the contrary, they broke, and ran as sheep before hounds; leaving the artillery, ammunition, provisions, baggage, and in short every thing, a prey to the enemy; and when we endeavoured to rally them, in hopes of regaining the ground, and what we had left upon it, it was with as little success as if we had attempted to have stopped the wild bears of the mountains, or the rivulets with our feet: for they would break by, in spite of every effort to prevent it."[6]

"The Virginia companies fought bravely and fell like soldiers; because, I believe, out of the three companies present that day, barely thirty men survived. Captain Peronny and all his officers down to a corporal were killed. Captain Poulson faced a similar fate, with only one of his men making it out. In short, the cowardice of the regular troops—so-called—left those willing to fulfill their duty facing almost certain death; and eventually, despite all efforts to the contrary, they broke and ran like sheep from hounds; abandoning the artillery, ammunition, supplies, baggage, and basically everything to the enemy. When we tried to regroup them in the hope of reclaiming the ground—and what little we had left on it—it was just as futile as trying to stop wild bears in the mountains or block streams with our feet: they broke through despite every attempt to hold them back."[6]

 

Wakefield

Wakefield

Wakefield—the Birthplace of George Washington

Wakefield—George Washington's Birthplace

This is from an etching made in idealization of the original house, situated on the banks of the Potomac, 38 miles from Fredericksburg, in Westmoreland County, Virginia, where our First President was born, February 22, 1732. The original house, which was built by Washington's father, Augustine, was destroyed by fire more than 150 years ago, before the Declaration of Independence was signed.

This is from an engraving that idealizes the original house, located on the banks of the Potomac, 38 miles from Fredericksburg, in Westmoreland County, Virginia, where our First President was born on February 22, 1732. The original house, built by Washington's father, Augustine, was lost to a fire over 150 years ago, before the Declaration of Independence was signed.

 

August.
Is appointed to the command of a regiment.

Colonel Washington had long been the favourite soldier of Virginia; and his reputation grew with every occasion for exertion. His conduct in this battle had been universally extolled;[7] and the common opinion of his countrymen was, that, had his advice been pursued, the disaster had been avoided. The assembly was in session, when intelligence was received of this defeat, and of the abandonment of the colony by Colonel Dunbar. The legislature, perceiving the necessity of levying troops for the defence of the province, determined to raise a regiment, to consist of sixteen companies, the command of which was offered to Colonel Washington; who was also designated, in his commission, as the Commander-in-chief of all the forces raised and to be raised in the colony of Virginia. The uncommon privilege of naming his Field Officers was added to this honourable manifestation of the public confidence.

Colonel Washington had long been the favorite soldier of Virginia, and his reputation grew with every opportunity to demonstrate his skills. His actions in this battle were praised by everyone; [7] and the general consensus among his fellow citizens was that if they had followed his advice, they could have avoided the disaster. The assembly was in session when they heard the news of the defeat and the abandonment of the colony by Colonel Dunbar. Recognizing the need to raise troops for the defense of the province, the legislature decided to form a regiment made up of sixteen companies, and they offered command of it to Colonel Washington. He was also appointed as the Commander-in-chief of all the forces raised and to be raised in the colony of Virginia in his commission. This honorable recognition came with the unusual privilege of being able to select his Field Officers.

Retaining still his prepossessions in favour of a military life, he cheerfully embraced this opportunity of re-entering the army. After making the necessary arrangements for the recruiting service, and visiting the posts on the frontiers, which he placed in the best state of defence of which they were susceptible; he set out for the seat of government, where objects of the first importance required his attention; but was overtaken below Fredericksburg by an express, carrying the intelligence, that a large number of French and Indians, divided into several parties, had broken up the frontier settlements; were murdering and capturing men, women, and children; burning their houses, and destroying their crops. The troops stationed among them for their protection, were unequal to that duty; and, instead of being able to afford aid to the inhabitants, were themselves blocked up in their forts.

Retaining his strong beliefs in favor of a military career, he happily took this chance to rejoin the army. After making the necessary arrangements for the recruiting service and checking the outposts along the frontiers, which he fortified as much as possible, he headed to the government seat, where urgent matters needed his attention. However, he was stopped just outside Fredericksburg by a messenger delivering news that a large group of French and Indians, split into several parties, had attacked the frontier settlements. They were killing and capturing men, women, and children; burning down houses and destroying crops. The troops stationed there to protect them were not able to fulfill their duties, and instead of helping the residents, they were trapped in their forts.

Extreme distress of the frontiers and exertions of Colonel Washington to augment the regular forces of the colony.

Colonel Washington hastened back to Winchester, where the utmost confusion and alarm prevailed. His efforts to raise the militia were unavailing. Attentive only to individual security, and regardless of the common danger, they could not be drawn from their families. Instead of assembling in arms, and obtaining safety by meeting their invaders, the inhabitants fled into the lower country, and increased the general terror. In this state of things, he endeavoured to collect and arm the men who had abandoned their houses, and to remove their wives and children to a distance from this scene of desolation and carnage. Pressing orders were at the same time despatched to the newly appointed officers, to forward their recruits; and to the county lieutenants, east of the Blue Ridge, to hasten their militia to Winchester: but before these orders could be executed, the party which had done so much mischief, and excited such alarm, had recrossed the Alleghany mountains.

Colonel Washington rushed back to Winchester, where there was complete chaos and panic. His attempts to enlist the militia were futile. Focused solely on their own safety and ignoring the common threat, they couldn’t be pulled away from their families. Instead of gathering together to confront their enemies, the residents fled to the lower country, spreading even more fear. In this situation, he tried to gather and arm the men who had left their homes and to move their wives and children far away from this scene of destruction and violence. Urgent orders were also sent out to the newly appointed officers to get their recruits moving, as well as to the county leaders east of the Blue Ridge to hurry their militia to Winchester. But before these orders could be carried out, the group responsible for all the damage and panic had already crossed back over the Alleghany mountains.

1756
April.

Early in the following spring, the enemy made another irruption into the inhabited country, and did great mischief. The number of troops on the regular establishment was totally insufficient for the protection of the frontier, and effective service from the militia was found to be unattainable. The Indians, who were divided into small parties, concealed themselves with so much dexterity, as seldom to be perceived until the blow was struck. Their murders were frequently committed in the very neighbourhood of the forts; and the detachments from the garrisons, employed in scouring the country, were generally eluded, or attacked to advantage. In one of these skirmishes, the Americans were routed, and Captain Mercer was killed. The people either abandoned the country, or attempted to secure themselves in small stockade forts, where they were in great distress for provisions, arms, and ammunition; were often surrounded, and sometimes cut off. Colonel Washington was deeply affected by this state of things. "I see their situation," said he, in a letter to the Lieutenant Governor, "I know their danger, and participate their sufferings, without having it in my power to give them farther relief than uncertain promises. In short, I see inevitable destruction in so clear a light, that unless vigorous measures are taken by the assembly, and speedy assistance sent from below, the poor inhabitants now in forts must unavoidably fall, while the remainder are flying before the barbarous foe. In fine, the melancholy situation of the people; the little prospect of assistance; the gross and scandalous abuses cast upon the officers in general, which is reflecting upon me in particular for suffering misconduct of such extraordinary kind; and the distant prospect, if any, of gaining reputation in the service, cause me to lament the hour that gave me a commission, and would induce me, at any other time than this of imminent danger, to resign, without one hesitating moment, a command from which I never expect to reap either honour or benefit; but, on the contrary, have almost an absolute certainty of incurring displeasure below, while the murder of helpless families may be laid to my account here."

Early in the following spring, the enemy invaded the settled areas again, causing a lot of damage. The size of the regular army was completely insufficient to protect the frontier, and the militia was ineffective. The Indians, who split into small groups, hid themselves so well that they were rarely seen until they struck. Their attacks often happened right near the forts; and the patrols from the garrisons trying to scout the area were usually evaded or caught off guard. In one of these skirmishes, the Americans were defeated, and Captain Mercer was killed. People either fled the area or tried to protect themselves in small stockade forts, where they suffered greatly from shortages of food, weapons, and ammunition; they were often surrounded and sometimes completely cut off. Colonel Washington was deeply troubled by this situation. "I see what they're going through," he wrote to the Lieutenant Governor, "I understand their danger, and I share in their suffering, without being able to offer them more than uncertain promises. In short, I see inevitable destruction so clearly that unless the assembly takes strong action and sends help quickly, the poor people in the forts will inevitably perish while the rest flee from the brutal enemy. The sad situation of the people; the slim chance of assistance; the gross and outrageous treatment of the officers in general, which reflects poorly on me specifically for allowing such misconduct; and the distant, if any, possibility of gaining a good reputation in this service make me regret the moment I received my commission, and would lead me, in any other situation than this one of imminent danger, to resign without a moment's hesitation from a command that I expect to yield neither honor nor advantage; on the contrary, I have almost a certainty of incurring displeasure from above while the murder of helpless families could be blamed on me here."

Colonel Washington had been prevented from taking post at fort Cumberland by an unfortunate and extraordinary difficulty, growing out of an obscurity in the royal orders, respecting the relative rank of officers commissioned by the king, and those commissioned by the governor. A Captain Dagworthy, who was at that place, and of the former description, insisted on taking the command, although it had been committed to Lieutenant Colonel Stevens; and, on the same principle, he contested the rank of Colonel Washington also. This circumstance had retained that officer at Winchester, where public stores to a considerable amount were deposited, with only about fifty men to guard them. In the deep distress of the moment, a council of war was called, to determine whether he should march this small body to some of the nearest forts, and, uniting with their petty garrisons, risk an action; or wait until the militia could be raised. The council unanimously advised a continuance at Winchester. Lord Fairfax, who commanded the militia of that and the adjacent counties, had ordered them to his assistance; but they were slow in assembling. The unremitting exertion of three days, in the county of Frederick, could produce only twenty men.

Colonel Washington had been unable to take his position at Fort Cumberland due to an unfortunate and unusual issue stemming from unclear royal orders about the ranks of officers commissioned by the king versus those commissioned by the governor. Captain Dagworthy, who was there and belonged to the former category, insisted on taking command even though it had been assigned to Lieutenant Colonel Stevens; he also challenged Colonel Washington's rank. This situation kept Washington in Winchester, where a significant amount of public supplies was stored, guarded by only about fifty men. In the face of this crisis, a council of war was called to decide whether to move this small group to the nearest forts and join forces with their small garrisons, risking an engagement, or to wait until the militia could be gathered. The council unanimously recommended staying in Winchester. Lord Fairfax, who commanded the militia of that area and nearby counties, had summoned them for support, but they were slow to gather. After three days of relentless efforts in Frederick County, only twenty men were assembled.

The incompetency of the military force to the defence of the country having become obvious, the assembly determined to augment the regiment to fifteen hundred men. In a letter addressed to the house of burgesses, Colonel Washington urged the necessity of increasing it still farther, to two thousand men; a less number than which could not possibly, in his opinion, be sufficient to cover the extensive frontier of Virginia, should the defensive system be continued. In support of this demand, he stated, in detail, the forts which must be garrisoned; and observed, that, with the exception of a few inhabitants in forts on the south branch of the Potowmac, the north mountain near Winchester had become the frontier; and that, without effectual aid, the inhabitants would even pass the Blue Ridge. He farther observed that the woods seemed "alive with French and Indians;" and again described so feelingly the situation of the inhabitants, that the assembly requested the governor to order half the militia of the adjoining counties to their relief; and the attorney general, Mr. Peyton Randolph, formed a company of one hundred gentlemen, who engaged to make the campaign, as volunteers. Ten well trained woodsmen, or Indians, would have rendered more service.

The military's inability to defend the country had become clear, so the assembly decided to increase the regiment to fifteen hundred men. In a letter to the house of burgesses, Colonel Washington emphasized the need to raise it even more, to two thousand men, arguing that any fewer would not adequately protect Virginia's vast frontier if the current defensive strategy continued. He detailed the forts that needed to be staffed and pointed out that, apart from a few residents in forts along the south branch of the Potomac, the northern mountain near Winchester had become the front line. He warned that without effective support, the settlers would even move past the Blue Ridge. He further noted that the woods appeared "alive with French and Indians" and vividly described the dire situation of the residents, leading the assembly to ask the governor to send half the militia from neighboring counties to help. Attorney General Mr. Peyton Randolph organized a group of one hundred volunteers to join the campaign. Ten skilled woodsmen or Indians would have been even more effective.

The distress of the country increased. As had been foreseen, Winchester became almost the only settlement west of the Blue Ridge, on the northern frontier; and fears were entertained that the enemy would soon pass even that barrier, and ravage the country below. Express after express was sent to hasten the militia, but sent in vain. At length, about the last of April, the French and their savage allies, laden with plunder, prisoners, and scalps, returned to fort Du Quesne.

The distress in the country grew. As anticipated, Winchester became nearly the only settlement west of the Blue Ridge on the northern frontier, and there were worries that the enemy would soon breach that barrier and devastate the land below. Messenger after messenger was sent to urge the militia to move quickly, but it was all for nothing. Finally, around the end of April, the French and their Native allies, weighed down with loot, prisoners, and scalps, returned to Fort Du Quesne.

Some short time after their retreat, the militia appeared. This temporary increase of strength was employed in searching the country for small parties of Indians, who lingered behind the main body, and in making dispositions to repel another invasion. A fort was commenced at Winchester, which, in honour of the general who had been appointed to the command of the British troops in America, was called fort Loudoun; and the perpetual remonstrances of Colonel Washington at length effected some improvement in the laws for the government of the troops.

Some time after their retreat, the militia showed up. This temporary boost in manpower was used to search the area for small groups of Indians that had stayed behind the main force and to prepare for another possible attack. A fort was started at Winchester, which was named Fort Loudoun in honor of the general who had been put in charge of the British troops in America. Eventually, Colonel Washington's ongoing complaints led to some improvements in the laws governing the troops.

Instead of adopting, in the first instance, that military code which experience had matured, the assembly passed occasional acts to remedy particular evils as they occurred; in consequence of which, a state of insubordination was protracted, and the difficulties of the commanding officer increased. Slight penalties were at first annexed to serious military offences; and when an act was obtained to punish mutiny and desertion with death, such crimes as cowardice in action, and sleeping on a post, were pretermitted. It was left impossible to hold a general court martial, without an order from the governor; and the commanding officer was not at liberty to make those arrangements in other respects which his own observation suggested, but shackled by the control of others, who could neither judge so correctly, nor be so well informed, as himself.

Instead of initially adopting the military code that experience had developed, the assembly passed occasional laws to fix specific issues as they arose. As a result, insubordination dragged on, and the commanding officer faced increasing challenges. Minor penalties were initially attached to serious military offenses, and when a law was introduced to punish mutiny and desertion with death, crimes like cowardice in battle and sleeping at a post were overlooked. It became impossible to hold a general court martial without the governor's order, and the commanding officer wasn't able to make the arrangements that his own observations suggested; he was constrained by the control of others who couldn't judge as accurately or be as well-informed as he was.

These errors of a government unused to war, though continually remarked by the officer commanding the troops, were slowly perceived by those in power, and were never entirely corrected.

These mistakes from a government inexperienced in war, while frequently pointed out by the officer in charge of the troops, were gradually recognized by those in power but were never fully fixed.

Successive incursions continued to be made into the country by small predatory parties of French and Indians, who kept up a perpetual alarm, and murdered the defenceless, wherever found. In Pennsylvania, the inhabitants were driven as far as Carlisle; and in Maryland, Fredericktown, on the eastern side of the Blue Ridge, became a frontier. With the Virginia regiment, which did not yet amount to one thousand men, aided occasionally by militia, Colonel Washington was to defend a frontier of near four hundred miles in extent, and to complete a chain of forts. He repeatedly urged the necessity and propriety of abandoning fort Cumberland, which was too far in advance of the settlements, and too far north, to be useful, while it required for its defence a larger portion of his force than could be spared with a proper regard to the safety of other and more advantageous positions. The governor, however, thought the abandonment of it improper, since it was a "king's fort;" and Lord Loudoun, on being consulted, gave the same opinion.

Successive raids continued to happen in the country by small, aggressive groups of French and Native Americans, who kept everyone in a constant state of fear and killed the defenseless wherever they could find them. In Pennsylvania, the residents were pushed back to Carlisle; in Maryland, Fredericktown, on the eastern side of the Blue Ridge, became the new frontier. With the Virginia regiment, which still had fewer than a thousand men, occasionally supported by local militias, Colonel Washington was tasked with defending nearly four hundred miles of frontier and completing a network of forts. He consistently stressed the need to abandon Fort Cumberland, which was too far ahead of the settlements and too far north to be useful, and required a larger portion of his forces than could be spared without jeopardizing the safety of other, more strategic positions. However, the governor believed abandoning it was not appropriate since it was a "king's fort;" and Lord Loudoun, when consulted, agreed with this view.

Among the subjects of extreme chagrin to the commander of the Virginia troops, was the practice of desertion. The prevalence of this crime was ascribed, in a considerable degree, to the ill-judged parsimony of the assembly. The daily pay of a soldier was only eight pence, out of which two pence were stopped for his clothes. This pay was inferior to what was received in every other part of the continent; and, as ought to have been foreseen, great discontents were excited by a distinction so invidious. The remonstrances of the commanding officer, in some degree, corrected this mischief; and a full suit of regimentals was allowed to each soldier, without deducting its price from his pay.

Among the biggest frustrations for the commander of the Virginia troops was the issue of desertion. This problem was largely blamed on the shortsighted stinginess of the assembly. Soldiers were only paid eight pence a day, with two pence deducted for their uniforms. This pay was less than what was given in other parts of the continent, and, as should have been expected, it caused significant unrest due to such an unfair distinction. The commanding officer's complaints somewhat addressed this issue, and each soldier was given a complete set of uniforms without having the cost taken out of their pay.

This campaign furnishes no event which can interest the reader; yet the duties of the officer, though minute, were arduous; and the sufferings of the people, beyond measure afflicting. It adds one to the many proofs which have been afforded, of the miseries to be expected by those who defer preparing the means of defence, until the moment when they ought to be used; and then, rely almost entirely, on a force neither adequate to the danger, nor of equal continuance.

This campaign offers no events that would engage the reader; however, the officer's responsibilities, while detailed, were demanding, and the suffering of the people was incredibly heartbreaking. It serves as yet another example of the hardships that await those who wait too long to prepare their defenses until the moment they are needed, relying almost entirely on a force that is neither sufficient for the threat nor sustainable.

It is an interesting fact to those who know the present situation of Virginia, that, so late as the year 1756, the Blue Ridge was the northwestern frontier; and that she found immense difficulty in completing a single regiment to protect the inhabitants from the horrors of the scalping knife, and the still greater horrors of being led into captivity by savages who added terrors to death by the manner of inflicting it.

It’s interesting for those who are familiar with Virginia's current situation to note that as recently as 1756, the Blue Ridge was the northwestern frontier. The state faced huge challenges in raising even a single regiment to protect residents from the terrifying threat of scalping and the even worse fear of being captured by Native Americans, who added additional horrors to death by the way they carried it out.

As soon as the main body of the enemy had withdrawn from the settlements, a tour was made by Colonel Washington to the south-western frontier. There, as well as to the north, continued incursions had been made; and there too, the principal defence of the country was entrusted to an ill-regulated militia. The fatal consequences of this system are thus stated by him, in a letter to the lieutenant governor: "The inhabitants are so sensible of their danger, if left to the protection of these people, that not a man will stay at his place. This I have from their own mouths, and the principal inhabitants of Augusta county. The militia are under such bad order and discipline, that they will come and go, when and where they please, without regarding time, their officers, or the safety of the inhabitants, but consulting solely their own inclinations. There should be, according to your honour's orders, one-third of the militia of these parts on duty at a time; instead of that, scarce one-thirtieth is out. They are to be relieved every month, and they are a great part of that time marching to and from their stations; and they will not wait one day longer than the limited time, whether relieved or not, however urgent the necessity for their continuance may be." Some instances of this, and of gross misbehaviour, were then enumerated; after which, he pressed the necessity of increasing the number of regulars to two thousand men.

As soon as the main force of the enemy pulled back from the settlements, Colonel Washington took a tour of the south-western frontier. There, as well as in the north, there had been ongoing attacks; and once again, the main defense of the area relied on an poorly organized militia. He outlined the serious consequences of this system in a letter to the lieutenant governor: "The residents are so aware of their danger if left to the protection of these people that not a single man will remain at his post. This I have heard directly from their own words and from the key residents of Augusta County. The militia is in such disarray and lacking discipline that they come and go whenever and wherever they want, completely disregarding time, their officers, or the safety of the residents, only considering their own desires. According to your honor’s orders, there should be one-third of the militia in these parts on duty at any given time; instead, hardly one-thirtieth is available. They are supposed to rotate every month, and for a large part of that time they are merely marching to and from their posts; they won’t stay even a day longer than their designated time, regardless of whether they are relieved or not, no matter how urgent the need for their presence may be." He then listed some examples of this and other serious misconduct, after which he emphasized the need to increase the number of regulars to two thousand men.

After returning from this tour, to Winchester, he gave the Lieutenant Governor, in curious detail, a statement of the situation in which he found the country, urging, but urging in vain, arguments which will always be suggested by experience, against relying chiefly on militia for defence.

After coming back from this tour to Winchester, he provided the Lieutenant Governor with a detailed account of the country's situation, urging—though unsuccessfully—points that experience will always suggest against relying primarily on militia for defense.

Sensible of the impracticability of defending such an extensive frontier, Colonel Washington continued to press the policy of enabling him to act on the offensive. The people of Virginia, he thought, could be protected only by entering the country of the enemy; giving him employment at home, and removing the source of all their calamities by taking possession of fort Du Quesne.

Aware of how impractical it was to defend such a large frontier, Colonel Washington kept pushing for a strategy that would allow him to take the offensive. He believed the people of Virginia could only be protected by attacking the enemy's territory, forcing him to fight on his home ground, and eliminating the cause of all their troubles by capturing Fort Du Quesne.

"As defensive measures," he observed in a letter to the Lieutenant Governor, "are evidently insufficient for the security and safety of the country, I hope no arguments are necessary to evince the necessity of altering them to a vigorous offensive war, in order to remove the cause." But in the event, that the assembly should still indulge their favourite scheme of protecting the inhabitants by forts along the frontiers, he presented a plan, which, in its execution, would require two thousand men—these were to be distributed in twenty-two forts, extending from the river Mayo to the Potowmac, in a line of three hundred and sixty miles. In a letter written about the same time to the speaker of the assembly, he said, "The certainty of advantage, by an offensive scheme of action, renders it, beyond any doubt, preferable to our defensive measures. Our scattered force, so separated and dispersed in weak parties, avails little to stop the secret incursions of the savages. We can only perhaps put them to flight, or frighten them to some other part of the country, which answers not the end proposed. Whereas, had we strength enough to invade their lands, we should restrain them from coming abroad, and leaving their families exposed. We should then remove the principal cause, and have stronger probability of success; we should be free from the many alarms, mischiefs, and murders, that now attend us; we should inspirit the hearts of our few Indian friends, and gain more esteem with them. In short, could Pennsylvania and Maryland be induced to join us in an expedition of this nature, and to petition his Excellency Lord Loudoun for a small train of artillery, with some engineers, we should then be able, in all human probability, to subdue the terror of fort Du Quesne; retrieve our character with the Indians; and restore peace to our unhappy frontiers."

"As defensive measures," he noted in a letter to the Lieutenant Governor, "are clearly not enough to ensure the security and safety of the country, I hope it's obvious that we need to shift to a strong offensive strategy to address the root cause." However, if the assembly continues to prefer their favored plan of protecting the people with forts along the borders, he proposed a plan that would require two thousand men—these would be stationed in twenty-two forts, stretching from the Mayo River to the Potomac, covering a line of three hundred and sixty miles. In a letter written around the same time to the speaker of the assembly, he stated, "The certainty of benefit from an offensive strategy clearly makes it preferable to our defensive measures. Our scattered force, so divided and spread out in small groups, does little to prevent the secret attacks from the natives. We might only manage to scare them off or drive them to another area, which doesn't achieve our goal. However, if we had enough strength to invade their territories, we could deter them from venturing out and leaving their families vulnerable. This would address the main issue and give us a much better chance of success; we would be free from the constant alarms, destruction, and killings that currently plague us; we would boost the spirits of our few Indian allies and earn their respect. In short, if Pennsylvania and Maryland could be persuaded to join us in an effort like this and request his Excellency Lord Loudoun for a small artillery unit, along with some engineers, we could most likely conquer the menace of Fort Duquesne; restore our reputation with the Indians; and bring peace back to our troubled frontiers."

His total inability to act offensively, or even to afford protection to the frontiers of Virginia, was not the only distressing and vexatious circumstance to which he was exposed. The Lieutenant Governor, to whose commands he was subjected in every minute particular, and who seems to have been unequal to the difficulties of his station, frequently deranged his system by orders which could not be executed without considerable hazard and inconvenience. Colonel Washington could not always restrain his chagrin on such occasions; and, on one of them, observed in a letter to an intimate friend, who possessed great influence in the country, "whence it arises, or why, I am truly ignorant, but my strongest representations of matters relative to the peace of the frontiers are disregarded, as idle and frivolous; my propositions and measures, as partial and selfish; and all my sincerest endeavours for the service of my country, perverted to the worst purposes. My orders are dark, doubtful, and uncertain: to-day approved, tomorrow condemned; left to act and proceed at hazard; accountable for the consequences, and blamed without the benefit of defence. If you can think my situation capable of exciting the smallest degree of envy, or of affording the least satisfaction, the truth is yet hid from you, and you entertain notions very different from the reality of the case. However, I am determined to bear up under all these embarrassments some time longer, in the hope of better regulations under Lord Loudoun, to whom I look for the future fate of Virginia."

His complete inability to take offensive action, or even to protect Virginia's borders, was not the only frustrating situation he faced. The Lieutenant Governor, who he had to follow in every tiny detail, seemed unable to handle the challenges of his role. This led to frequent orders that disrupted his plans and came with significant risks and inconveniences. Colonel Washington couldn’t always hide his frustration during these times; in one instance, he wrote to a close friend with considerable influence in the region, "I don’t know why this is happening, but my best efforts to communicate the importance of peace at the frontiers are ignored as meaningless; my suggestions are seen as selfish and my sincere attempts to serve my country twisted for the worst ends. My orders are unclear, unreliable, and inconsistent: approved one day, criticized the next; left to act on instinct; held responsible for the outcomes and blamed without a chance to explain. If you think my situation is anything to be envied or brings any satisfaction, you clearly don’t understand the reality. Still, I am determined to endure these challenges a little longer, hoping for better leadership under Lord Loudoun, who I believe holds the future of Virginia in his hands."

Not long after this letter was written, Lord Loudoun, in whose person the offices of Governor and Commander-in-chief were united, arrived in Virginia. A comprehensive statement of the situation of the colony, in a military point of view, and of the regiment in particular, was drawn up and submitted to him by Colonel Washington. In this he enumerated the errors which had prevented the completion of his regiment, showed the insufficiency of the militia for any military purpose, and demonstrated the superiority of an offensive system over that which had been pursued.

Not long after this letter was written, Lord Loudoun, who held both the positions of Governor and Commander-in-Chief, arrived in Virginia. Colonel Washington provided him with a detailed report on the colony's military situation and specifically about the regiment. In this report, he listed the mistakes that had hindered the formation of his regiment, pointed out how inadequate the militia was for any military operation, and argued that an offensive strategy was more effective than the approach that had been taken.

1757

This statement was probably presented by Colonel Washington in person, who was permitted, during the winter, to visit Lord Loudoun in Philadelphia, where that nobleman met the Governors of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and North Carolina, and the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, in order to consult with them on the measures to be taken, in their respective Provinces, for the ensuing campaign. He was, however, disappointed in his favourite hope of being able to act offensively against the French on the Ohio. Lord Loudoun had determined to direct all his efforts against Canada, and to leave only twelve hundred men in the middle and southern colonies. Instead of receiving assistance, Virginia was required to send four hundred men to South Carolina. Not discouraged by these disappointments, Colonel Washington continued indefatigable in his endeavours to impress on Mr. Dinwiddie, and on the assembly, the importance of reviving, and properly modifying their military code, which had now expired, of making a more effective militia law, and of increasing their number of regular troops.

This statement was likely delivered by Colonel Washington himself, who was allowed to visit Lord Loudoun in Philadelphia during the winter. There, that nobleman met with the Governors of Pennsylvania, Maryland, and North Carolina, along with the Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, to discuss what actions to take in their respective colonies for the upcoming campaign. However, he was let down in his hope to take offensive action against the French in the Ohio region. Lord Loudoun had decided to focus all his efforts on Canada and only leave twelve hundred men in the middle and southern colonies. Instead of getting support, Virginia was asked to send four hundred men to South Carolina. Undeterred by these setbacks, Colonel Washington continued tirelessly to convince Mr. Dinwiddie and the assembly of the importance of reviving and properly updating their military code, which had now expired, creating a more effective militia law, and increasing their number of regular troops.

May.

So far from succeeding on the last subject, he had the mortification to witness a measure which crushed his hopes of an adequate regular force. Being unable to complete the regiment by voluntary enlistment, the assembly changed its organization, and reduced it to ten companies; each to consist of one hundred men. Yet his anxious wishes continued to be directed towards fort Du Quesne. In a letter written about this time to Colonel Stanwix, who commanded in the middle colonies, he said, "You will excuse me, sir, for saying, that I think there never was, and perhaps never again will be, so favourable an opportunity as the present for reducing fort Du Quesne. Several prisoners have made their escape from the Ohio this spring, and agree in their accounts, that there are but three hundred men left in the garrison; and I do not conceive that the French are so strong in Canada, as to reinforce this place, and defend themselves at home this campaign: surely then this is too precious an opportunity to be lost."

So far from succeeding on the last topic, he was disheartened to see a decision that dashed his hopes for a proper regular force. Unable to complete the regiment through voluntary enlistment, the assembly reorganized it and cut it down to ten companies, each with a hundred men. Still, his anxious hopes were focused on Fort Du Quesne. In a letter written around this time to Colonel Stanwix, who was in charge of the middle colonies, he said, "Please forgive me for saying, sir, that I believe there has never been, and perhaps never will be, such a favorable opportunity as now to take Fort Du Quesne. Several prisoners have escaped from the Ohio this spring and agree in their accounts that there are only three hundred men left in the garrison; I don’t think the French are strong enough in Canada to send reinforcements here and defend themselves at home this campaign: surely this is too valuable an opportunity to miss."

But Mr. Pitt did not yet direct the councils of Britain; and a spirit of enterprise and heroism did not yet animate her generals. The campaign to the north was inglorious; and to the west, nothing was even attempted, which might relieve the middle colonies.

But Mr. Pitt hadn't taken charge of Britain's affairs yet, and her generals were still lacking the drive and bravery they needed. The campaign up north was shameful, and in the west, there wasn't even an effort made to assist the middle colonies.

October 8.

Large bodies of savages, in the service of France, once more spread desolation and murder over the whole country, west of the Blue Ridge. The regular troops were inadequate to the protection of the inhabitants; and the incompetency of the defensive system to their security became every day more apparent. "I exert every means," said Colonel Washington, in a letter to Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie, "to protect a much distressed country; but it is a task too arduous. To think of defending a frontier of more than three hundred and fifty miles extent, as ours is, with only seven hundred men, is vain and idle; especially when that frontier lies more contiguous to the enemy than any other.

Large groups of savages, working for France, devastated and killed throughout the entire area west of the Blue Ridge. The regular troops were not enough to protect the residents, and the flaws in the defensive system regarding their safety became more obvious every day. "I’m doing everything I can," Colonel Washington wrote in a letter to Lieutenant Governor Dinwiddie, "to protect a heavily affected region; but it's an overwhelming task. Trying to defend a frontier that stretches over three hundred and fifty miles with only seven hundred men is pointless, especially when that frontier is closer to the enemy than anywhere else."

"I am, and for a long time have been, fully convinced, that if we continue to pursue a defensive plan, the country must be inevitably lost."

"I am, and have been for a long time, completely convinced that if we keep following a defensive strategy, the country will inevitably be lost."

October 24.

In another letter he said, "The raising a company of rangers, or augmenting our strength in some other manner, is so far necessary, that, without it, the remaining inhabitants of this once fertile and populous valley will scarcely be detained at their dwellings until the spring. And if there is no expedition to the westward then, nor a force more considerable than Virginia can support, posted on our frontiers; if we still adhere, for the next campaign, to our destructive defensive schemes, there will not, I dare affirm, be one soul living on this side the Blue Ridge the ensuing autumn, if we except the troops in garrison, and a few inhabitants of this town, who may shelter themselves under the protection of this fort. This I know to be the immoveable determination of all the settlers of this country." To the Speaker of the assembly he gave the same opinion; and added, "I do not know on whom these miserable undone people are to rely for protection. If the assembly are to give it to them, it is time that measures were at least concerting, and not when they ought to be going into execution, as has always been the case. If they are to seek it from the Commander-in-chief, it is time their condition was made known to him. For I can not forbear repeating again, that, while we pursue defensive measures, we pursue inevitable ruin."

In another letter, he said, "Forming a company of rangers or increasing our strength in some way is necessary. Without it, the remaining residents of this once fertile and populated valley will hardly be able to stay in their homes until spring. And if there’s no expedition to the west then, nor a larger force than Virginia can support stationed on our frontiers; if we continue with our destructive defensive strategies next campaign, I can confidently say that there won't be anyone left on this side of the Blue Ridge by next autumn, except for the troops in garrison and a few townspeople who might find refuge under this fort's protection. I know this is the unwavering decision of all the settlers in this region." He expressed the same view to the Speaker of the Assembly and added, "I don’t know who these unfortunate people can depend on for protection. If the Assembly is supposed to provide it, it's time to start planning, not when it should already be happening, as has always been the case. If they need to request it from the Commander-in-chief, it's time to inform him about their situation. I can't stress enough that as long as we stick to defensive tactics, we’re heading for certain disaster."

August 27.

It was impossible for Colonel Washington, zealous in the service of his country, and ambitious of military fame, to observe the errors committed in the conduct of the war, without censuring them. These errors were not confined to the military affairs of the colony. The Cherokee and Catawba Indians had hitherto remained faithful to the English, and it was very desirable to engage the warriors of those tribes heartily in their service; but so miserably was the intercourse with them conducted, that, though a considerable expense was incurred, not much assistance was obtained, and great disgust was excited among them. The freedom with which the Commander-in-chief of the Virginia forces censured public measures, gave offence to the Lieutenant Governor, who considered these censures as manifesting a want of respect for himself. Sometimes he coarsely termed them impertinent; and at other times, charged him with looseness in his information, and inattention to his duty. On one of these occasions, Colonel Washington thus concluded a letter of detail, "Nothing remarkable has happened, and therefore I have nothing to add. I must beg leave, however, before I conclude, to observe, in justification of my own conduct, that it is with pleasure I receive reproof when reproof is due, because no person can be readier to accuse me, than I am to acknowledge an error, when I have committed it; nor more desirous of atoning for a crime, when I am sensible of being guilty of one. But, on the other hand, it is with concern I remark, that my best endeavours lose their reward; and that my conduct, although I have uniformly studied to make it as unexceptionable as I could, does not appear to you in a favourable point of light. Otherwise, your honour would not have accused me of loose behaviour, and remissness of duty, in matters where, I think, I have rather exceeded than fallen short of it. This, I think, is evidently the case in speaking of Indian affairs at all, after being instructed in very express terms, 'Not to have any concern with, or management of Indian affairs.' This has induced me to forbear mentioning the Indians in my letters to your honour of late, and to leave the misunderstanding, which you speak of, between Mr. Aikin and them, to be related by him."

It was impossible for Colonel Washington, dedicated to serving his country and eager for military recognition, to ignore the mistakes made during the war without pointing them out. These mistakes weren't limited to military operations in the colony. The Cherokee and Catawba Indians had remained loyal to the English until now, and it was crucial to get their warriors fully involved; however, the way they managed relations with these tribes was so poor that, despite spending a significant amount, not much help came in, and it left them feeling very upset. The way the Commander-in-chief of the Virginia forces openly criticized public actions annoyed the Lieutenant Governor, who saw these criticisms as a sign of disrespect towards him. Sometimes he bluntly called them impertinent; other times, he accused him of being careless with his information and neglecting his duties. On one such occasion, Colonel Washington ended a detailed letter saying, "Nothing significant has happened, so I have nothing to add. I must, however, mention, in defense of my actions, that I welcome criticism when it's deserved, because no one is quicker to acknowledge my own mistakes than I am; nor do I want to avoid taking responsibility when I know I've done something wrong. But on the flip side, it concerns me that my best efforts aren't being recognized, and that despite my constant efforts to remain beyond reproach, my actions don't seem to reflect well in your view. Otherwise, you wouldn't have accused me of loose behavior and remissness in duty regarding things where I believe I've actually gone above and beyond. I believe this is especially true when it comes to discussing Indian affairs, after being told explicitly, 'Not to have any concern with, or management of Indian affairs.' This is why I have avoided mentioning the Indians in my recent letters to you, and why I’ve left the misunderstanding you mentioned between Mr. Aikin and them for him to explain."

Not long after this, he received a letter informing him of some coarse calumny, reflecting on his veracity and honour, which had been reported to the Lieutenant Governor. He enclosed a copy of this letter to Mr. Dinwiddie, and thus addressed him,—"I should take it infinitely kind if your honour would please to inform me whether a report of this nature was ever made to you; and, in that case, who was the author of it.

Not long after this, he got a letter telling him about some nasty rumors questioning his truthfulness and honor, which had been reported to the Lieutenant Governor. He attached a copy of this letter to Mr. Dinwiddie and addressed him like this: "I would greatly appreciate it if you could let me know whether a report like this ever reached you, and if so, who the author was."

"It is evident from a variety of circumstances, and especially from the change in your honour's conduct towards me, that some person, as well inclined to detract, but better skilled in the art of detraction than the author of the above stupid scandal, has made free with my character. For I can not suppose, that malice so absurd, so barefaced, so diametrically opposite to truth, to common policy, and, in short, to everything but villany, as the above is, could impress you with so ill an opinion of my honour and honesty.

"It’s clear from various situations, especially from the way you've started acting towards me, that someone—skilled at gossip and intent on undermining me—has taken liberties with my reputation. I can’t believe that such outrageous malice, so blatant and completely opposite to the truth, common sense, and everything except wickedness, could cause you to think so poorly of my integrity and honesty."

"If it be possible that ——, for my belief is staggered, not being conscious of having given the least cause to any one, much less to that gentleman, to reflect so grossly; I say, if it be possible that ---- could descend so low as to be the propagator of this story, he must either be vastly ignorant of the state of affairs in this country at that time, or else, he must suppose that the whole body of the inhabitants had combined with me in executing the deceitful fraud. Or why did they, almost to a man, forsake their dwellings in the greatest terror and confusion; and while one half of them sought shelter in paltry forts, (of their own building,) the other should flee to the adjacent counties for refuge; numbers of them even to Carolina, from whence they have never returned?

"If it’s possible that ——, because I’m really taken aback, as I’m not aware of having done anything to anyone, let alone that gentleman, to provoke such a harsh reaction; I say, if it’s possible that ---- could stoop so low as to spread this story, he must either be incredibly uninformed about what was happening in this country at that time, or he must think that everyone here teamed up with me to pull off this deceitful plan. Otherwise, why did they, almost entirely, abandon their homes in such fear and chaos; while one group sought safety in flimsy forts (that they built themselves), another fled to nearby counties for safety; many even went as far as Carolina, from where they’ve never come back?"

"These are facts well known; but not better known than that these wretched people, while they lay pent up in forts, destitute of the common supports of life, (having in their precipitate flight forgotten, or rather, been unable to secure any kind of necessaries,) did despatch messengers of their own, (thinking I had not represented their miseries in the piteous manner they deserved,) with addresses to your honour and the assembly, praying relief. And did I ever send any alarming account, without sending also the original papers (or the copies) which gave rise to it?

"These are facts that everyone knows; but not more than the fact that these unfortunate people, while trapped in forts and lacking basic necessities (having forgotten or been unable to grab any supplies during their hasty escape), sent their own messengers (thinking I hadn’t portrayed their suffering in the heartfelt way it deserved) to you and the assembly, asking for help. And have I ever reported any alarming news without also including the original documents (or copies) that prompted it?"

"That I have foibles, and perhaps many of them, I shall not deny. I should esteem myself, as the world also would, vain and empty, were I to arrogate perfection.

"That I have flaws, and maybe even a lot of them, I won’t deny. I would consider myself, as the world would too, vain and superficial if I claimed to be perfect."

"Knowledge in military matters is to be acquired only by practice and experience; and if I have erred, great allowance should be made for want of them; unless my errors should appear to be wilful; and then, I conceive, it would be more generous to charge me with my faults, and to let me stand or fall according to evidence, than to stigmatize me behind my back.

"Knowledge in military matters can only be gained through practice and experience; and if I have made mistakes, a lot of understanding should be given for my lack of them; unless my mistakes seem to be intentional; and then, I believe it would be kinder to point out my faults and let me succeed or fail based on the facts, rather than to criticize me behind my back."

"It is uncertain in what light my services may have appeared to your Honour: but this I know, and it is the highest consolation I am capable of feeling, that no man that ever was employed in a public capacity, has endeavoured to discharge the trust reposed in him with greater honesty, and more zeal for the country's interest than I have done; and if there is any person living, who can say with justice that I have offered any intentional wrong to the public, I will cheerfully submit to the most ignominious punishment that an injured people ought to inflict. On the other hand, it is hard to have my character arraigned, and my actions condemned, without a hearing.

"It’s unclear how my services have been viewed by your Honor, but what I do know, and this gives me the greatest comfort I can feel, is that no one who has ever worked in a public role has tried harder to fulfill the trust placed in them with more honesty and dedication to the country’s interests than I have. If there is anyone out there who can justly claim that I have intentionally wronged the public, I will willingly accept whatever harsh punishment an aggrieved people think I deserve. On the flip side, it’s tough to have my character called into question and my actions condemned without a chance to defend myself."

"I must therefore again beg in more plain, and in very earnest terms, to know if ——has taken the liberty of representing my conduct to your Honour with such ungentlemanly freedom as the letter implies. Your condescension herein will be acknowledged a singular favour."

"I must therefore again ask in more straightforward and very serious terms to know if —— has had the audacity to describe my behavior to you in such an unrefined way as the letter suggests. Your response to this will be recognized as a unique favor."

In a letter, some short time after this, to the Lieutenant Governor, he said, "I do not know that I ever gave your Honour cause to suspect me of ingratitude; a crime I detest, and would most carefully avoid. If an open, disinterested behaviour carries offence, I may have offended; for I have all along laid it down as a maxim, to represent facts freely and impartially, but not more so to others than to you, sir. If instances of my ungrateful behaviour had been particularized, I would have answered them. But I have been long convinced that my actions and their motives have been maliciously aggravated." A request that he might be permitted to come to Williamsburg for the settlement of some accounts, which he was desirous of adjusting under the inspection of the Lieutenant Governor, who proposed to leave the province in the following November, was refused in abrupt and disobliging terms. In answer to the letter containing the refusal, Colonel Washington, after stating the immoveable disposition of the inhabitants to leave the country unless more sufficiently protected, added, "To give a more succinct account of their affairs than I could in writing, was the principal, among many other reasons, that induced me to ask leave to come down. It was not to enjoy a party of pleasure that I asked leave of absence. I have indulged with few of those, winter or summer."

In a letter shortly after, addressed to the Lieutenant Governor, he stated, "I don’t think I’ve ever given you any reason to suspect me of ingratitude, a sin I detest and try to avoid at all costs. If being open and unbiased has offended you, then I may have done so; because I’ve always made it a point to present facts honestly and fairly, not just to you, but to everyone, sir. If you had specified instances of my alleged ingratitude, I would have addressed them. However, I've long believed that my actions and their motives have been unfairly distorted." He asked for permission to come to Williamsburg to settle some accounts, which he wanted to manage under the Lieutenant Governor's supervision, since he planned to leave the province the following November, but his request was denied in a blunt and rude manner. In his response to the rejection, Colonel Washington, after mentioning the residents’ firm intent to leave the area unless better protection was provided, added, "One of the main reasons I wanted to come down was to give you a clearer account of their situation than I could in writing. I didn’t request leave to enjoy a social outing. I’ve rarely taken part in such gatherings, whether in winter or summer."

Mr. Dinwiddie soon afterwards took leave of Virginia, and the government devolved on Mr. Blair, the President of the Council. Between him and the commander of the colonial troops the utmost cordiality existed.

Mr. Dinwiddie soon after that left Virginia, and the government was handed over to Mr. Blair, the President of the Council. There was complete friendliness between him and the commander of the colonial troops.

General Forbes undertakes the expedition against Fort Du Quesne.

After the close of this campaign, Lord Loudoun returned to England, and General Abercrombie succeeded to the command of the army. The department of the middle and southern provinces was committed to General Forbes, who, to the inexpressible gratification of Colonel Washington, determined to undertake an expedition against fort Du Quesne.

After this campaign ended, Lord Loudoun went back to England, and General Abercrombie took over command of the army. The area of the middle and southern provinces was assigned to General Forbes, who, to Colonel Washington's great satisfaction, decided to launch an expedition against Fort Du Quesne.

1758

He urged an early campaign, but he urged it ineffectually; and, before the troops were assembled, a large body of French and Indians broke into the country, and renewed the horrors of the tomahawk and scalping-knife. The county of Augusta was ravaged and about sixty persons were murdered. The attempts made to intercept these savages were unsuccessful; and they recrossed the Alleghany, with their plunder, prisoners, and scalps.

He pushed for an early campaign, but it didn't go anywhere; and, before the troops could gather, a large group of French and Native Americans invaded the area, bringing back the terror of violence and brutality. The county of Augusta was devastated, and around sixty people were killed. Attempts to stop these attackers failed, and they crossed back over the Alleghany with their loot, captives, and scalps.

May 24.

At length, orders were given to assemble the regiment at Winchester, and be in readiness to march in fifteen days. On receiving them, Colonel Washington called in his recruiting parties; but so inattentive had the government been to his representations that, previous to marching his regiment, he was under the necessity of repairing to Williamsburg, personally to enforce his solicitations for arms, ammunition, money, and clothing. That these preparations for an expedition vitally interesting to Virginia, should remain to be made after the season for action had commenced, does not furnish stronger evidence of the difficulties encountered by the chief of the military department, than is given by another circumstance of about the same date. He was under the necessity of pointing out and urging the propriety of allowing to his regiment, which had performed much severe service, the same pay which had been granted to a second regiment, voted the preceding session of Assembly, to serve for a single year.

Finally, orders were given to gather the regiment at Winchester and be ready to march in fifteen days. Upon receiving this news, Colonel Washington called back his recruiting teams; however, the government had been so unresponsive to his requests that, before marching with his regiment, he had to travel to Williamsburg to personally push for arms, ammunition, money, and clothing. The fact that these preparations for such a crucial expedition for Virginia had to be made after the action period had started highlights the challenges faced by the head of the military department, as evidenced by another incident around the same time. He had to advocate for his regiment, which had done a lot of tough work, to receive the same pay that a second regiment had been granted at the previous Assembly session, which was set to serve for just one year.

Among other motives for an early campaign, Colonel Washington had urged the impracticability of detaining the Indians. His fears were well founded. Before a junction of the troops had been made, these savages became impatient to return to their homes; and, finding that the expedition would yet be delayed a considerable time, they left the army, with promises to rejoin it at the proper season.

Among other reasons for an early campaign, Colonel Washington had pointed out the difficulty of keeping the Indians from leaving. His concerns were valid. Before the troops could join together, these warriors grew restless to return home; and, realizing that the expedition would be delayed for quite some time, they parted ways with the army, promising to come back at the right time.

June 24.

In pursuance of the orders which had been received, the Virginia troops moved in detachments from Winchester to fort Cumberland, where they assembled early in July: after which, they were employed in opening a road to Raystown, where Colonel Bouquet was stationed. As the English were continually harassed by small parties of French and Indians, the general had contemplated advancing a strong detachment over the Alleghany mountains, for the purpose of giving them employment at home. By the advice of Colonel Washington this plan was relinquished. In support of his opinion, he stated the probability that a large force was collected at fort Du Quesne, and the impracticability of moving a strong detachment, without such a quantity of provisions, as would expose it to the danger of being discovered and cut to pieces. He advised to harass them with small parties, principally of Indians; and this advice was pursued.

In line with the orders received, the Virginia troops moved in groups from Winchester to Fort Cumberland, where they gathered early in July. After that, they worked on opening a road to Raystown, where Colonel Bouquet was stationed. Since the English were constantly troubled by small groups of French and Indians, the general considered sending a large detachment over the Alleghany Mountains to confront them at home. However, at Colonel Washington's suggestion, this plan was dropped. He argued that a large force might be gathered at Fort Du Quesne, and that moving a significant detachment without enough supplies would put it at risk of being spotted and destroyed. Instead, he recommended harassing them with small groups, mainly consisting of Indians, and this advice was followed.

July.

Colonel Washington had expected that the army would march by Braddock's road: but, late in July, he had the mortification to receive a letter from Colonel Bouquet, asking an interview with him, in order to consult on opening a new road from Raystown, and requesting his opinion on that route. "I shall," says he, in answer to this letter, "most cheerfully work on any road, pursue any route, or enter upon any service, that the general or yourself may think me usefully employed in, or qualified for; and shall never have a will of my own, when a duty is required of me. But since you desire me to speak my sentiments freely, permit me to observe, that, after having conversed with all the guides, and having been informed by others acquainted with the country, I am convinced that a road, to be compared with General Braddock's, or indeed that will be fit for transportation even by pack-horses, can not be made. I own I have no predilection for the route you have in contemplation for me."

Colonel Washington had expected the army to march along Braddock's road. However, in late July, he was disappointed to receive a letter from Colonel Bouquet, asking to meet with him to discuss opening a new road from Raystown and seeking his opinion on that route. "I will," he replied to the letter, "happily work on any road, follow any route, or take on any task that you or the general think I can be useful for or am qualified to do; I will never have my own desires when a duty is expected of me. But since you want me to express my thoughts honestly, let me say that, after talking with all the guides and hearing from others familiar with the area, I am convinced that a road that can compare to General Braddock's, or one that is even suitable for transporting goods by pack-horses, cannot be built. I admit I don’t have any preference for the route you’re considering for me."

A few days after writing this letter, he had an interview with Colonel Bouquet, whom he found decided in favour of opening the new road. After their separation, Colonel Washington, with his permission, addressed to him a letter to be laid before General Forbes, then indisposed at Carlisle, in which he stated his reasons against this measure. He concluded his arguments against the new road: arguments which appear to be unanswerable, by declaring his fears that, should the attempt be made, they would be able to do nothing more than fortify some post on the other side of the Alleghany, and prepare for another campaign. This he prayed Heaven to avert.

A few days after writing this letter, he had a meeting with Colonel Bouquet, who was firmly in favor of opening the new road. After they parted ways, Colonel Washington, with his permission, wrote a letter to be presented to General Forbes, who was then unwell in Carlisle, outlining his objections to this plan. He wrapped up his arguments against the new road—arguments that seemed unassailable—by expressing his fears that if the attempt was made, they would only be able to fortify some position on the other side of the Alleghany and prepare for another campaign. He prayed that this could be avoided.

He was equally opposed to a scheme which had been suggested of marching by the two different routes, and recommended an order of march by Braddock's road, which would bring the whole army before fort Du Quesne in thirty-four days, with a supply of provisions for eighty-six days.

He was just as opposed to the idea of marching along two different routes and suggested a marching plan along Braddock's road, which would get the entire army to Fort Du Quesne in thirty-four days, with enough supplies for eighty-six days.

August 2.

In a letter of the same date addressed to Major Halket, aid of General Forbes, Colonel Washington thus expressed his forebodings of the mischiefs to be apprehended from the adoption of the proposed route. "I am just returned from a conference held with Colonel Bouquet. I find him fixed—I think I may say unalterably fixed—to lead you a new way to the Ohio, through a road, every inch of which is to be cut at this advanced season, when we have scarcely time left to tread the beaten track, universally confessed to be the best passage through the mountains.

In a letter dated the same day addressed to Major Halket, aide to General Forbes, Colonel Washington expressed his concerns about the potential problems that could arise from the proposed route. "I just returned from a meeting with Colonel Bouquet. I've found him determined—I'd say absolutely determined—to take you a new way to the Ohio, along a road that will need to be cleared inch by inch at this late time of year, when we hardly have enough time left to travel the well-known path, which is widely recognized as the best route through the mountains."

"If Colonel Bouquet succeeds in this point with the general, all is lost! all is lost indeed! our enterprise is ruined! and we shall be stopped at the Laurel hill this winter; but not to gather laurels, except of the kind which cover the mountains. The southern Indians will turn against us, and these colonies will be desolated by such an accession to the enemy's strength. These must be the consequences of a miscarriage; and a miscarriage, the almost necessary consequence of an attempt to march the army by this route."

"If Colonel Bouquet gets this right with the general, we're done for! We're completely finished! Our mission is ruined, and we'll be stuck at Laurel Hill this winter, but not to earn any glory, just the kind that covers the mountains. The southern Indians will betray us, and these colonies will be devastated by such a boost to the enemy’s power. These are the likely outcomes of a failure, and a failure is almost guaranteed if we try to move the army along this route."

Colonel Washington's remonstrances and arguments were unavailing; and the new route was adopted. His extreme chagrin at this measure, and at the delays resulting from it, was expressed in anxious letters to Mr. Fauquier, then governor of Virginia, and to the speaker of the house of burgesses.

Colonel Washington's protests and arguments didn't work; the new route was chosen. His deep frustration with this decision and the delays it caused was conveyed in worried letters to Mr. Fauquier, who was then the governor of Virginia, and to the speaker of the house of burgesses.

September 2.

In a letter to the speaker, written while at fort Cumberland, he said: "We are still encamped here; very sickly, and dispirited at the prospect before us. That appearance of glory which we once had in view—that hope—that laudable ambition of serving our country, and meriting its applause, are now no more: all is dwindled into ease, sloth, and fatal inactivity. In a word, all is lost, if the ways of men in power, like certain ways of Providence, are not inscrutable. But we who view the actions of great men at a distance can only form conjectures agreeably to a limited perception; and, being ignorant of the comprehensive schemes which may be in contemplation, might mistake egregiously in judging of things from appearances, or by the lump. Yet every f—l will have his notions—will prattle and talk away; and why may not I? We seem then, in my opinion, to act under the guidance of an evil genius. The conduct of our leaders, if not actuated by superior orders, is tempered with something—I do not care to give a name to. Nothing now but a miracle can bring this campaign to a happy issue." He then recapitulated the arguments he had urged against attempting a new road, and added, "But I spoke unavailingly. The road was immediately begun; and since then, from one to two thousand men have constantly wrought on it. By the last accounts I have received, they had cut it to the foot of the Laurel hill, about thirty-five miles; and I suppose, by this time, fifteen hundred men have taken post about ten miles further, at a placed called Loyal Hanna, where our next fort is to be constructed.

In a letter to the speaker, written while at Fort Cumberland, he said: "We're still camped here; it's very unhealthy, and we're discouraged by what lies ahead. The shining vision we once had—our hope and ambition to serve our country and earn its praise—has vanished. Now, everything has shrunk into laziness, indifference, and harmful inaction. In short, everything is lost if the actions of those in power, like some aspects of fate, are not mysterious. But we who observe great leaders from afar can only make guesses based on limited understanding; and, since we're unaware of the broad plans that might be in the works, we could easily misjudge situations based on appearances or general impressions. Yet every fool has their opinions—rattling on and on; so why shouldn't I? It seems to me that we’re acting under the influence of a bad fate. The actions of our leaders, unless driven by higher orders, carry an air of something—I’m not sure what to call it. Only a miracle could bring this campaign to a successful conclusion." He then restated the points he had made against trying a new route and added, "But my words fell on deaf ears. The road was quickly started; and since then, between one and two thousand men have been working on it constantly. According to my latest updates, they've cut it to the base of Laurel Hill, about thirty-five miles; and I assume that by now, around fifteen hundred men have taken position about ten miles farther at a place called Loyal Hanna, where we plan to build our next fort.

"We have certain intelligence that the French strength at fort Du Quesne did not exceed eight hundred men, the thirteenth ultimo; including about three or four hundred Indians. See how our time has been misspent—behold how the golden opportunity is lost—perhaps, never to be regained! How is it to be accounted for? Can General Forbes have orders for this?—Impossible. Will then our injured country pass by such abuses? I hope not. Rather let a full representation of the matter go to his majesty; let him know how grossly his glory and interests, and the public money have been prostituted."

"We have some information that the French strength at Fort Du Quesne did not exceed eight hundred men as of the thirteenth of last month, including about three or four hundred Indians. Look at how we've wasted our time—see how we've lost a golden opportunity—perhaps never to be regained! How can we explain this? Could General Forbes have given orders for this? —Impossible. Will our suffering country just overlook such abuses? I hope not. Instead, let's make sure a complete report of the situation reaches His Majesty; let him understand how badly his glory and interests, along with public funds, have been misused."

September 22.
Defeat of Major Grant.

Colonel Washington was soon afterwards ordered to Raystown. Major Grant had been previously detached from the advanced post at Loyal Hanna, with a select corps of eight hundred men, to reconnoitre the country about fort Du Quesne. In the night he reached a hill near the fort, and sent forward a party for the purpose of discovery. They burnt a log house, and returned. Next morning, Major Grant detached Major Lewis, of Colonel Washington's regiment, with a baggage guard, two miles into his rear; and sent an engineer, with a covering party, within full view of the fort, to take a plan of the works. In the mean time he ordered the reveillée to be beaten in different places. An action soon commenced, on which Major Lewis, leaving Captain Bullett, with about fifty Virginians to guard the baggage, advanced with the utmost celerity to support Major Grant. The English were defeated with considerable loss; and both Major Grant and Major Lewis were taken prisoners. In this action, the Virginians evidenced the spirit with which they had been trained. Out of eight officers, five were killed, a sixth wounded, and a seventh taken prisoner. Captain Bullett, who defended the baggage with great resolution, and contributed to save the remnant of the detachment, was the only officer who escaped unhurt. Of one hundred and sixty-two men, sixty-two were killed on the spot, and two wounded. This conduct reflected high honour on the commanding officer of the regiment as well as on the troops; and he received, on the occasion, the compliments of the general. The total loss was two hundred and seventy-three killed, and forty-two wounded.

Colonel Washington was soon ordered to Raystown. Major Grant had been previously sent from the advanced post at Loyal Hanna with a select group of eight hundred men to scout the area around Fort Du Quesne. That night, he reached a hill near the fort and sent out a team for reconnaissance. They burned a log house and returned. The next morning, Major Grant sent Major Lewis, from Colonel Washington's regiment, with a baggage guard two miles to the rear and sent an engineer with a covering team, right within sight of the fort, to draw up a plan of the works. In the meantime, he ordered the reveillée to be sounded in different locations. A conflict soon began, during which Major Lewis, leaving Captain Bullett with about fifty Virginians to guard the baggage, rushed to support Major Grant. The English were defeated with significant losses; both Major Grant and Major Lewis were captured. In this fight, the Virginians showed the fighting spirit they had been trained to exhibit. Of eight officers, five were killed, a sixth was wounded, and a seventh was taken prisoner. Captain Bullett, who defended the baggage with great determination and helped save what was left of the unit, was the only officer who came out unharmed. Of one hundred and sixty-two men, sixty-two were killed on the spot, and two were wounded. This performance brought great honor to the commanding officer of the regiment as well as to the troops; he received commendations from the general on this occasion. The overall loss was two hundred and seventy-three killed and forty-two wounded.

October 8.

It was at length determined that the main body of the army should move from Raystown; and the general called on the colonels of regiments, to submit severally to his consideration, a plan for his march. That proposed by Colonel Washington has been preserved, and appears to have been judiciously formed.

It was finally decided that the main part of the army would move from Raystown; and the general asked the colonels of the regiments to each submit a plan for his march. The plan proposed by Colonel Washington has been kept and seems to have been well thought out.

They reached the camp at Loyal Hanna, through a road indescribably bad, about the fifth of November; where, as had been predicted, a council of war determined that it was unadviseable to proceed farther this campaign. It would have been almost impossible to winter an army in that position. They must have retreated from the cold inhospitable wilderness into which they had penetrated, or have suffered immensely; perhaps have perished. Fortunately, some prisoners were taken, who informed them of the extreme distress of the fort. Deriving no support from Canada, the garrison was weak; in great want of provisions; and had been deserted by the Indians. These encouraging circumstances changed the resolution which had been taken, and determined the general to prosecute the expedition.

They arrived at the camp in Loyal Hanna, traveling along an unbelievably bad road, around the fifth of November; where, as predicted, a council of war decided it was unwise to go any further this campaign. It would have been nearly impossible to winter an army in that place. They would have had to retreat from the cold, unwelcoming wilderness they had entered, or suffer greatly; perhaps even perish. Fortunately, some prisoners were captured, who informed them of the dire situation at the fort. Lacking support from Canada, the garrison was weak, in desperate need of supplies, and had been abandoned by the Indians. These encouraging developments changed the previously made decision and led the general to continue with the expedition.

Fort Du Quesne evacuated by the French, and taken possession of by the English.
November 25.

Colonel Washington was advanced in front; and, with immense labour, opened a way for the main body of the army. The troops moved forward with slow and painful steps until they reached fort Du Quesne, of which they took peaceable possession; the garrison having on the preceding night, after evacuating and setting it on fire, proceeded down the Ohio in boats.

Colonel Washington led the way and, after a lot of effort, cleared a path for the main army. The troops moved slowly and with great difficulty until they arrived at Fort Du Quesne, which they took over without resistance; the garrison had evacuated the night before, set the fort on fire, and left down the Ohio River in boats.

To other causes than the vigour of the officer who conducted this enterprise, the capture of this important place is to be ascribed. The naval armaments of Britain had intercepted the reinforcements designed by France for her colonies; and the pressure on Canada was such as to disable the governor of that province from detaching troops to fort Du Quesne. Without the aid of these causes, the extraordinary and unaccountable delays of the campaign must have defeated its object.

To other reasons besides the strength of the officer who led this mission, the capture of this important location is attributed. Britain's naval forces had blocked the reinforcements intended by France for her colonies; and the pressure on Canada was so great that it prevented the governor of that province from sending troops to Fort Du Quesne. Without these factors, the unusual and inexplicable delays of the campaign would have derailed its goals.

The works were repaired, and the new fort received the name of the great minister, who, with unparalleled vigour and talents, then governed the nation.

The works were fixed, and the new fort was named after the great minister, who, with unmatched energy and skill, was then leading the nation.

After furnishing two hundred men from his regiment as a garrison for fort Pitt, Colonel Washington marched back to Winchester; whence he soon afterwards proceeded to Williamsburg, to take his seat in the General Assembly, of which he had been elected a member by the county of Frederick, while at fort Cumberland.

After providing two hundred men from his regiment as a garrison for Fort Pitt, Colonel Washington marched back to Winchester; from there, he soon went to Williamsburg to take his seat in the General Assembly, to which he had been elected as a member by Frederick County while at Fort Cumberland.

A cessation of Indian hostility being the consequence of expelling the French from the Ohio, Virginia was relieved from the dangers with which she had been threatened; and the object for which alone he had continued in the service, after perceiving that he should not be placed on the permanent establishment, was accomplished. His health was much impaired, and his domestic affairs required his attention.

A stop to Indian hostility resulting from driving the French out of Ohio meant that Virginia was free from the threats she had faced. The only reason he had stayed in service, after realizing he wouldn’t be placed on a permanent basis, was achieved. His health had declined significantly, and he needed to focus on his personal matters.

Resignation and marriage of Colonel Washington.

Impelled by these and other motives of a private nature, he determined to withdraw from a service, which he might now quit without dishonour; and, about the close of the year, resigned his commission, as colonel of the first Virginia regiment, and commander-in-chief of all the troops raised in the colony.

Driven by these and other personal reasons, he decided to resign from a position that he could leave without shame; and, near the end of the year, he stepped down from his role as colonel of the first Virginia regiment and commander-in-chief of all the troops raised in the colony.

 

Washington Family Burial Ground

Washington Family Burial Ground

The Washington Family Burial Ground

**The Washington Family Cemetery**

Wakefield, Westmoreland County, Virginia

Wakefield, Westmoreland County, VA

Here rest the mortal remains of George Washington's great-grandfather, Colonel John Washington, who came to Virginia in 1658 and was buried here in 1677; of his grandfather, Lawrence Washington, buried in 1697; of his grandmother, Jane (Butler), in 1729; of his father, Augustine Washington, in 1743; and other members of the Washington family.

Here lie the remains of George Washington's great-grandfather, Colonel John Washington, who arrived in Virginia in 1658 and was buried here in 1677; his grandfather, Lawrence Washington, buried in 1697; his grandmother, Jane (Butler), in 1729; his father, Augustine Washington, in 1743; and other members of the Washington family.

 

The officers whom he had commanded were greatly attached to him. They manifested their esteem and their regret at parting, by a very affectionate address,[8] expressive of the high opinion they entertained both of his military and private character.

The officers he had led were very fond of him. They showed their respect and sadness at his departure with a warm speech,[8] that expressed the high regard they had for both his military and personal character.

This opinion was not confined to the officers of his regiment. It was common to Virginia; and had been adopted by the British officers with whom he served. The duties he performed, though not splendid, were arduous; and were executed with zeal, and with judgment. The exact discipline he established in his regiment, when the temper of Virginia was extremely hostile to discipline, does credit to his military character, and the gallantry the troops displayed, whenever called into action, manifests the spirit infused into them by their commander.

This view wasn’t limited to the officers in his regiment. It was widespread in Virginia and was also shared by the British officers he worked with. The tasks he carried out, while not glamorous, were challenging, and he performed them with enthusiasm and skill. The strict discipline he implemented in his regiment, at a time when Virginia’s attitude was very anti-discipline, reflects well on his military reputation. The bravery the troops showed whenever they were called to action demonstrates the motivation he instilled in them as their leader.

The difficulties of his situation, while unable to cover the frontier from the French and Indians, who were spreading death and desolation in every quarter, were incalculably great; and no better evidence of his exertions, under these distressing circumstances, can be given, than the undiminished confidence still placed in him, by those whom he was unable to protect.

The difficulties he faced, while being unable to secure the border against the French and Native Americans, who were bringing death and destruction all around, were immense; and no better proof of his efforts in these tough times can be shown than the unwavering trust still held in him by those he couldn’t protect.

The efforts to which he incessantly stimulated his country for the purpose of obtaining possession of the Ohio; the system for the conduct of the war which he continually recommended; the vigorous and active measures always urged upon those by whom he was commanded; manifest an ardent and enterprising mind, tempered by judgment, and quickly improved by experience.

The constant push he gave his country to gain control of the Ohio, the strategy for conducting the war that he consistently suggested, and the strong and proactive steps he always encouraged those in charge to take, all show an eager and ambitious mind, balanced by good judgment and sharpened by experience.

Not long after his resignation, he was married to Mrs. Custis; a young lady to whom he had been for some time attached; and who, to a large fortune and fine person, added those amiable accomplishments which ensure domestic happiness, and fill, with silent but unceasing felicity, the quiet scenes of private life.

Not long after he resigned, he married Mrs. Custis, a young woman he had been in love with for a while. Besides being wealthy and attractive, she had the kind of qualities that guarantee a happy home life and bring quiet, lasting joy to everyday moments.


CHAPTER II.

Colonel Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces.... Arrives at Cambridge.... Strength and disposition of the two armies.... Deficiency of the Americans in arms and ammunition.... Distress of the British from the want of fresh provisions.... Falmouth burnt.... Success of the American cruisers.... Measures to form a continental army.... Difficulty of re-enlisting the troops.... Plan for attacking Boston.... General Lee detached to New York.... Possession taken of the heights of Dorchester.... Boston evacuated.... Correspondence respecting prisoners.

Colonel Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American forces.... Arrives at Cambridge.... Strength and position of the two armies.... Lack of arms and ammunition for the Americans.... The British are struggling due to a shortage of fresh food.... Falmouth burned.... Success of the American ships.... Steps taken to create a continental army.... Challenges in re-enlisting the troops.... Plan to attack Boston.... General Lee sent to New York.... Heights of Dorchester taken.... Boston evacuated.... Communication regarding prisoners.

 

1775

The attention of Colonel Washington, for several years after his marriage, was principally directed to the management of his estate. He continued a most respectable member of the legislature of his country, in which he took an early and a decided part against the claims of supremacy asserted by the British Parliament. As hostilities approached, he was chosen by the independent companies, formed through the northern parts of Virginia, to command them; and was elected a member of the first congress which met at Philadelphia. The illustrious patriots who composed it, soon distinguished him as the soldier of America, and placed him on all those committees whose duty it was to make arrangements for defence. When it became necessary to appoint a commander-in-chief, his military character, the solidity of his judgment, the steady firmness of his temper, the dignity of his person and deportment, the confidence inspired by his patriotism and integrity, and the independence of his fortune, combined to designate him, in the opinion of all, for that important station. Local jealousy was suppressed, not only by the enthusiasm of the moment, but by that policy which induced the sagacious delegation from New England, to prefer a commander-in-chief from the south.

The focus of Colonel Washington, for several years after getting married, was mainly on managing his estate. He remained a highly respected member of his local legislature, where he took a strong stand against the supremacy claims made by the British Parliament. As tensions rose, he was chosen by the independent companies formed in the northern parts of Virginia to lead them; he was also elected to the first congress that met in Philadelphia. The distinguished patriots who were part of it quickly recognized him as America's soldier and assigned him to all the committees responsible for defense arrangements. When it became necessary to appoint a commander-in-chief, his military experience, sound judgment, steady demeanor, dignified presence, the confidence he instilled through his patriotism and integrity, and his independent wealth all led everyone to agree that he was the right person for that crucial role. Local rivalries were set aside, not just due to the excitement of the moment but also because the wise delegates from New England preferred a commander-in-chief from the South.

Colonel Washington appointed Commander-in-chief of the American forces.

On the 14th of June, he was unanimously chosen "General, and Commander-in-chief of the armies of the United Colonies, and all the forces now raised, or to be raised by them."[9]

On June 14th, he was unanimously selected as "General and Commander-in-Chief of the armies of the United Colonies, along with all the forces currently raised or to be raised by them."[9]

June 15.

On the succeeding day, when the President communicated this appointment to him, he expressed his high sense of the honour conferred upon him, and his firm determination to exert every power he possessed in the service of his country and of her "glorious cause." At the same time he acknowledged the distress he felt from a consciousness that his abilities and military experience might not be equal to the extensive and important trust.

On the next day, when the President informed him of this appointment, he expressed how honored he felt and his strong commitment to use all his abilities in service of his country and her "glorious cause." At the same time, he admitted feeling distressed, aware that his skills and military experience might not match the significant responsibilities he was given.

He declined all compensation for his services; and avowed an intention to keep an exact account of his expenses, which he should rely on Congress to discharge.

He refused any payment for his services and stated that he planned to keep a detailed record of his expenses, which he would expect Congress to cover.

A special commission was directed, and a resolution unanimously passed, declaring that "Congress would maintain, assist, and adhere to him, as the General and Commander-in-chief of the forces raised, or to be raised, for the maintenance and preservation of American liberty, with their lives and fortunes."

A special commission was created, and a resolution was unanimously passed, stating that "Congress would support, assist, and stand by him as the General and Commander-in-Chief of the forces raised, or to be raised, for the protection and preservation of American liberty, with their lives and resources."

He prepared, without delay, to enter upon the arduous duties of his office; and, remaining only a few days in New York, where several important arrangements were to be made, proceeded to the head quarters of the American army.

He got ready right away to take on the challenging responsibilities of his job; and after spending just a few days in New York, where he needed to handle several important tasks, he headed to the headquarters of the American army.

Arrives at Cambridge.

As all orders of men concurred in approving his appointment, all concurred in expressing their satisfaction at that event, and their determination to afford him entire support. A committee of the Congress of Massachusetts waited to receive him at Springfield, on the confines of the colony, and to escort him to the army. On his arrival, an address was presented to him by the House of Representatives, breathing the most cordial affection, and testifying the most exalted respect. His answer[10] was well calculated to keep up impressions essential to the success of that arduous contest into which the United Colonies had entered.

As everyone agreed on his appointment, they also expressed their satisfaction about it and their commitment to fully support him. A committee from the Congress of Massachusetts was there to welcome him at Springfield, on the edge of the colony, and to accompany him to the army. When he arrived, the House of Representatives gave him a warm address filled with genuine affection and great respect. His response[10] was carefully crafted to maintain the important sentiments necessary for the success of the challenging struggle that the United Colonies had embarked upon.

July 3.
Strength and disposition of the two armies.

The first moments after his arrival in camp were employed in reconnoitring the enemy, and examining the strength and situation of the American troops.

The first moments after he arrived in camp were spent scouting the enemy and assessing the strength and position of the American troops.

The main body of the British army, under the immediate command of General Howe, was entrenching itself strongly on Bunker's hill. Three floating batteries lay in Mystic river, near the camp, and a twenty gun ship below the ferry, between Boston and Charlestown. A strong battery on the Boston side of the water, on Cop's or Cope's hill, served to cover and strengthen the post on Bunker's hill. Another division was deeply entrenched on Roxbury neck. The light horse, and an inconsiderable body of infantry, were stationed in Boston.

The main part of the British army, led directly by General Howe, was heavily fortifying itself on Bunker Hill. Three floating batteries were positioned in the Mystic River, close to the camp, along with a twenty-gun ship stationed below the ferry, between Boston and Charlestown. A strong battery on the Boston side of the river, on Cop's or Cope's Hill, was used to support and enhance the position on Bunker Hill. Another division was well entrenched at Roxbury Neck. The light cavalry and a small group of infantry were stationed in Boston.

The American army lay on both sides of Charles river. The right occupied the high grounds about Roxbury; whence it extended towards Dorchester; and the left was covered by Mystic or Medford river, a space of at least twelve miles. These extensive lines could not be contracted without opening to the British general a communication with the country.

The American army was positioned on both sides of the Charles River. The right side was on the high ground around Roxbury and extended toward Dorchester, while the left was protected by the Mystic or Medford River, covering an area of at least twelve miles. These long lines couldn’t be shortened without giving the British general a way to connect with the rest of the country.

For the purpose of a more distinct arrangement, the army was thrown into three grand divisions. That part of it which lay about Roxbury constituted the right wing, and was commanded by Major General Ward; the troops near Mystic or Medford river formed the left, which was placed under Major General Lee. The centre, including the reserve, was under the immediate command of General Washington, whose head quarters were at Cambridge.

To create a clearer structure, the army was divided into three main divisions. The part stationed around Roxbury made up the right wing and was led by Major General Ward; the troops near the Mystic or Medford River formed the left wing, commanded by Major General Lee. The center, which included the reserve, was directly overseen by General Washington, whose headquarters were in Cambridge.

The army consisted of fourteen thousand five hundred men; but several circumstances combined to render this force less effective than its numbers would indicate.

The army had fourteen thousand five hundred men, but various factors made this force less effective than its numbers suggested.

Deficiency of the Americans in arms and ammunition.

So long had the hope of avoiding open hostilities been indulged, that the time for making preparations to meet them had passed away unemployed, and the neglect could not be remedied. On General Washington's arrival in camp, he had ordered a return of the ammunition to be made; and the report stated three hundred and three barrels of powder to be in store. A few days after this return, the alarming discovery was made, that the actual quantity was not more than sufficient to furnish each man with nine cartridges. This mistake had been produced by a misapprehension of the committee of supplies, (for the magazines were not yet in possession of military officers,) who, instead of returning the existing quantity, reported the whole which had been originally furnished by the Province. Though the utmost exertions were made, this critical state of things continued about a fortnight, when a small supply of powder was received from Elizabethtown, in New Jersey.[11] The utmost address was used to conceal from the enemy this alarming deficiency; but when it is recollected, in how many various directions, and to what various bodies, application for assistance was unavoidably made, it will appear scarcely possible that those efforts at concealment could have been completely successful. It is more probable that the communications which must have been made to the British general were discredited; and that he could not permit himself to believe, that an army without bayonets would be hardy enough to maintain the position occupied by the Provincials, if destitute of ammunition.

So long had the hope of avoiding open conflict been nurtured that the time for preparing to face it had slipped by unused, and that neglect couldn't be fixed. When General Washington arrived at camp, he ordered a report on the ammunition; the report stated there were three hundred and three barrels of powder in store. A few days after this report, an alarming discovery was made: the actual amount was barely enough to give each soldier nine cartridges. This error came from a misunderstanding by the supply committee (since the magazines were not yet under military control), which reported the entire amount originally provided by the Province instead of the existing quantity. Despite the greatest efforts, this critical situation lasted about two weeks, until a small supply of powder arrived from Elizabethtown, New Jersey. The utmost skill was used to hide this alarming shortage from the enemy, but considering the numerous requests for help made in various directions, it seems unlikely that those efforts to conceal the truth could have been entirely successful. It’s more probable that the messages sent to the British general were doubted, and he could not believe that an army without bayonets would be bold enough to hold the position taken by the Provincials if they were out of ammunition.

The troops were also in such need of tents, as to be placed in barracks, instead of being encamped in the open field; and were almost destitute of clothing. They had, too, been raised by the colonial governments; each of which organized its quota on different principles. From this cause resulted not only a want of uniformity, but other defects which were much more important. In Massachusetts, the soldiers had chosen their platoon officers, and generally lived with them as equals. This unmilitary practice was the certain index of that general insubordination which pervaded every department. The difficulty of establishing principles of order and obedience, always considerable among raw troops, was increased by the short terms for which enlistments had been made. The quotas of some of the colonies would be entitled to a discharge in November; and none were engaged to continue in service longer than the last of December. The early orders evidence a state of things still more loose and unmilitary than was to be inferred from the circumstances under which the war had been commenced.

The troops were in desperate need of tents, so they had to stay in barracks instead of being camped out in the open. They also almost had no clothing. They had been raised by the colonial governments, each of which organized its group based on different principles. This caused not only a lack of uniformity but also other issues that were even more significant. In Massachusetts, the soldiers had selected their platoon leaders and often lived with them as equals. This unmilitary practice clearly indicated the general insubordination that infected every department. The challenge of establishing order and obedience, always difficult among inexperienced troops, was made worse by the short enlistment periods. Some colonies' quotas would qualify for discharge in November, and none were committed to serve longer than the end of December. The early orders show an even more chaotic and unmilitary situation than what could be expected considering the circumstances under which the war started.

An additional inconvenience, derived from this mixed agency of local governments with that of the Union, was thus stated by General Washington in a letter addressed to congress:—"I should be extremely deficient in gratitude as well as justice, if I did not take the first opportunity to acknowledge the readiness and attention which the congress and different committees have shown to make every thing as convenient and agreeable as possible; but there is a vital and inherent principle of delay, incompatible with military service, in transacting business through such various and different channels.[12] I esteem it my duty, therefore, to represent the inconvenience that must unavoidably ensue from a dependence on a number of persons for supplies; and submit it to the consideration of congress, whether the public service will not be best promoted by appointing a Commissary General for the purpose."[13]

An additional issue stemming from the mixed roles of local governments and the Union was outlined by General Washington in a letter to Congress: "I would be lacking in both gratitude and fairness if I didn’t take the first chance to acknowledge the readiness and attention that Congress and various committees have shown to make everything as convenient and agreeable as possible; however, there is a fundamental principle of delay that conflicts with military service when doing business through so many different channels.[12] Therefore, I feel it is my duty to point out the unavoidable inconvenience that comes from relying on many people for supplies, and I suggest to Congress that the public service would be better served by appointing a Commissary General for this purpose."[13]

Every military operation was also seriously affected by the total want of engineers, and the deficiency of working tools.

Every military operation was significantly impacted by the complete lack of engineers and the shortage of equipment.

To increase difficulties already so considerable, the appointment of general officers, made by congress, gave extensive dissatisfaction, and determined several of those who thought themselves injured, to retire from the service.

To make the already significant challenges even tougher, the appointment of general officers by Congress led to widespread dissatisfaction and caused several individuals who felt wronged to leave the service.

These disadvantages deducted essentially from the capacity of the American force: but under them all, the General observed with pleasure "the materials for a good army." These were "a great number of men, able bodied, active, zealous in the cause, and of unquestionable courage." Possessed of these materials, he employed himself indefatigably in their organization. The army was arranged into divisions and brigades; and congress was urged to the appointment of a Paymaster, Quarter-master General, and such other general staff as are indispensable in the structure of a regular military establishment.

These drawbacks really took away from the strength of the American force: but despite all that, the General happily noted "the ingredients for a strong army." These included "a large number of able-bodied men, energetic, passionate about the cause, and undeniably courageous." With these resources, he tirelessly focused on organizing them. The army was structured into divisions and brigades, and Congress was pushed to appoint a Paymaster, Quartermaster General, and any other essential staff needed for a proper military setup.

The two armies continued to work on their respective fortifications, without seriously molesting each other. Slight skirmishes occasionally took place, in which little execution was done; and, although the Americans made some advances, no attempt was made to dislodge them.

The two armies kept building up their fortifications without really bothering each other. There were some minor skirmishes now and then, but they didn’t lead to much. Even though the Americans made some progress, there was no serious effort to push them back.

September.

The Commander-in-chief submitted with reluctance to this state of apparent inactivity. He felt the importance of destroying the army in Boston, before it should be strengthened by reinforcements in the ensuing spring; and with a view to this object, frequently reconnoitred its situation, and was assiduous in collecting every information respecting its strength. The result of his observations and inquiries seems to have been, a strong inclination to the opinion, that to carry the works by storm, though hazardous, was not impracticable. A council of general officers being unanimously of opinion, that for the present at least, the attempt ought not to be made, it was laid aside.

The Commander-in-chief reluctantly accepted this situation of seeming inactivity. He understood the importance of taking out the army in Boston before it received reinforcements in the coming spring. To achieve this, he often surveyed its position and diligently gathered information about its strength. His observations and inquiries led him to strongly believe that, while risky, it was not impossible to capture the fortifications by storm. However, a council of general officers unanimously agreed that, at least for now, the attempt should not be made, so it was put on hold.

Distress of the British from the want of fresh provisions.

A rigorous blockade being maintained, the British army began to suffer considerably for fresh meat and vegetables. The small parties which sailed from Boston, in quest of these articles, were frequently disappointed by the vigilance of the minute men. But the continuance of active exertion, which this service required on the part of the inhabitants of the sea coast, soon became burdensome; and the governors of the several colonies pressed for detachments from the main army. Although it was impossible to spare the troops required, without hazarding the cause of the colonies, great irritation was excited by the refusal to comply with these demands of particular protection. They at length became so importunate, and the unavoidable refusal to comply with them was so ill received, that congress was induced to pass a resolution, declaring that the army before Boston was designed only to oppose the enemy at that place, and ought not to be weakened by detachments for the security of other parts of the country. At Newport, in Rhode Island, the committee sought to secure the place, by entering into a compromise with Captain Wallace, who commanded the ships of war on that station, stipulating that he should be furnished with provisions on condition of his sparing the town, and committing no depredations on the country. This compromise contravened so essentially the general plan of distressing the British forces, that General Washington deemed it necessary to interpose, and represent to the Governor of that province, the mischief to be apprehended from so dangerous a practice.

With a strict blockade in place, the British army started to face significant shortages of fresh meat and vegetables. Small groups that set sail from Boston to find these supplies were often let down by the watchfulness of the minute men. However, the constant effort this situation required from the coastal residents soon became a burden, and the governors of the various colonies urged for units to be detached from the main army. Although it was impossible to spare the needed troops without risking the colonies' cause, there was considerable frustration over the refusal to meet these requests for specific protection. Eventually, the pressure became so intense, and the unavoidable denial was received so poorly, that Congress felt compelled to pass a resolution stating that the army stationed in Boston was only meant to confront the enemy there and should not be weakened by detachments for the safety of other areas. In Newport, Rhode Island, the committee tried to secure the location by negotiating with Captain Wallace, who commanded the naval ships in that area, agreeing to provide him with provisions in exchange for sparing the town and avoiding damage to the surrounding region. This deal went against the overall strategy of pressuring the British forces, prompting General Washington to step in and warn the Governor of the potential harm from such a risky practice.

While the blockade of Boston was thus perseveringly maintained, other events of considerable importance took place elsewhere.

While the blockade of Boston was constantly upheld, other significant events occurred in different locations.

In July, Georgia joined her sister colonies, and chose delegates to represent her in congress: after which, the style of "The thirteen United Colonies" was assumed; and by that title, the English Provinces, confederated and in arms, were thenceforward designated.

In July, Georgia joined her sister colonies and selected delegates to represent her in Congress. After that, the name "The Thirteen United Colonies" was adopted, and from then on, the English provinces, united and in arms, were referred to by that title.

September 5.

After a recess of one month, congress again assembled at Philadelphia. The state of the colonies, and the letters of the Commander-in-chief being immediately taken into consideration, the scarcity of arms and ammunition engaged their most serious attention. Great exertions[14] had been made, by importation and by domestic manufacture, to extricate the country from this perilous situation; but the supplies were unequal to the necessities of the army; and the danger resulting from the want of articles, so vitally essential in war, still continued to be great.

After a month-long break, Congress gathered again in Philadelphia. They quickly looked into the situation of the colonies and the letters from the Commander-in-Chief, focusing on the severe shortage of arms and ammunition. Significant efforts[14] had been made, both through imports and local manufacturing, to free the country from this dangerous predicament; however, the supplies fell short of what the army required, and the threat from the lack of such crucial items in wartime remained considerable.

The importance of a maritime force to the military operations of a country possessing an immense extent of sea coast must always be sensibly felt; and, in an early stage of the contest, the particular attention of the United Colonies was directed more immediately to this interesting object, by an event not very unusual in war, but which, at this time, excited no ordinary degree of resentment.

The significance of a naval force for the military operations of a country with a vast coastline is always clear; and early in the conflict, the United Colonies focused even more intently on this crucial issue due to an event that, while not uncommon in warfare, stirred an extraordinary level of anger at this moment.

Orders had been issued to the commanders of the British ships of war to proceed, as in the case of actual rebellion, against those seaport towns which were accessible, and in which any troops should be raised, or military works erected.

Orders had been given to the commanders of the British warships to take action, as if there were a real rebellion, against the coastal towns that were reachable and where any troops might be recruited or military structures built.

October.
Falmouth burnt.

Falmouth, a flourishing village on the sea coast of Massachusetts, having given some particular offence, a small naval force, commanded by Captain Mowat, was, under colour of these orders, detached for its destruction. After making an ineffectual effort to induce the inhabitants to deliver up their arms and ammunition, and four of the principal citizens as hostages, he commenced a furious cannonade and bombardment, by which the town was reduced to ashes. An attempt was then made to penetrate into the country; but the militia and minute men, rather irritated than intimidated by this wanton act of unavailing devastation, drove the party, which had landed, back to their ships.

Falmouth, a thriving village on the coast of Massachusetts, had caused some specific offense, so a small naval force, led by Captain Mowat, was sent to destroy it under the pretense of these orders. After unsuccessfully trying to get the residents to hand over their weapons and ammunition, as well as four of the leading citizens as hostages, he started a relentless cannon and bomb attack that left the town in ruins. An attempt was then made to push further into the countryside, but the militia and minute men, more angered than scared by this senseless act of destruction, forced the landing party back to their ships.

This measure was loudly reprobated throughout America, and contributed, not a little, to turn the attention of the United Colonies to their marine. It was one immediate motive with the convention of Massachusetts, for granting letters of marque and reprisal; and was assigned by congress, in addition to the capture of American merchantmen on the high seas, as an inducement for fitting out some ships of war; to man which they directed two battalions of marines to be recruited.

This action was heavily criticized across America and played a significant role in shifting the focus of the United Colonies to their naval capabilities. It was one of the main reasons behind the Massachusetts convention's decision to issue letters of marque and reprisal. Congress also cited it, along with the capture of American merchant ships on the high seas, as a reason to outfit some warships; they instructed that two battalions of marines be recruited for this purpose.

Success of the American cruisers.

Though congress deferred granting general letters of reprisal, they adopted a measure of equal efficacy, but less hostile in appearance. Their ships of war were authorized to capture all vessels employed in giving assistance to the enemy; the terms used in their resolution were such as comprehended every possible capture. A few small cruisers had already been fitted out by the directions of General Washington; and the coasts soon swarmed with the privateers of New England. These naval exertions were attended with valuable consequences. Many captures were made; and important supplies of ammunition were thus obtained.

Though Congress postponed granting general letters of reprisal, they took a similar action that seemed less aggressive. Their warships were allowed to seize any vessels aiding the enemy; the wording in their resolution covered every potential capture. A few small cruisers had already been outfitted under General Washington's orders, and soon the coasts were filled with privateers from New England. These naval efforts resulted in significant outcomes. Many captures were made, and important supplies of ammunition were acquired in the process.

Although the British army had manifested no intention to evacuate Boston, fears were continually entertained for New York. Mr. Tryon, who was popular in that province, had been lately recalled from North Carolina, and appointed its governor. His utmost influence was employed in detaching that colony from the union; and his exertions were seconded by the Asia man of war, whose guns commanded the town. The consequence of these intrigues and of this terror was, that even in the convention, disaffection to the American cause began openly to show itself; and a determination to join the king's standard is said to have been expressed with impunity. These threatening appearances were rendered the more serious by some confidential communications from England, stating the intention of administration to send a fleet into the Hudson, and to occupy both New York and Albany. Under the alarm thus excited, an effort was made in congress to obtain a resolution for seizing the governor. He had, however, been artful enough to make impressions in his favour; and he was defended by a part of the delegation from New York with so much earnestness that, for a time, the advocates of the proposition forbore to press it. Afterwards, when the increasing defection in that province induced Congress to resume the subject, the resolution was expressed in general terms; and assumed the form of a recommendation, to those who exercised the legislative and executive functions in the several provinces, "to arrest and secure every person in the respective colonies, whose going at large might, in their opinion, endanger the safety of the colony, or the liberties of America." Intelligence of this resolution is supposed to have been received by the governor, who, after some correspondence with the mayor of the city respecting his personal safety, retired for security on board the Halifax packet, and continued to carry on his intrigues with nearly as much advantage as while on shore.

Although the British army showed no intention of evacuating Boston, there were ongoing fears for New York. Mr. Tryon, who was well-liked in that province, had recently been recalled from North Carolina and appointed governor. He used all his influence to separate that colony from the union, with the help of the Asia man of war, whose guns had control over the town. As a result of these schemes and the fear they created, even in the convention, discontent with the American cause began to show openly, and some expressed a desire to join the king's forces without fear of repercussions. These alarming signs were made more serious by secret communications from England indicating that the government planned to send a fleet to the Hudson River and occupy both New York and Albany. In response to this alarm, there was an effort in Congress to pass a resolution for seizing the governor. However, he had cleverly built support for himself, and part of the New York delegation defended him so passionately that, for a time, those supporting the resolution decided not to push it. Later, as the defection in that province grew, Congress revisited the topic, and the resolution was framed in general terms, taking the form of a recommendation to those who held legislative and executive powers in the various provinces "to arrest and secure every person in the respective colonies, whose presence might, in their opinion, threaten the safety of the colony or the freedoms of America." The governor is believed to have learned of this resolution, and after some communication with the city's mayor regarding his safety, he sought refuge on board the Halifax packet, continuing his schemes with nearly as much success as he had onshore.

But the subject which, next to the supply of arms and ammunition, most interested the American government, was the re-enlistment of the army.

But the topic that, after the supply of weapons and ammunition, most interested the American government, was the re-enlistment of the army.

 

Washington Elm

Washington Elm

The Historic Washington Elm at Cambridge, Massachusetts

The Historic Washington Elm in Cambridge, Massachusetts

"Under this tree," as the granite tablet states, "Washington first took command of the American army, July 3d, 1775." This picture is from a photograph taken about the year 1900. In spite of the most determined efforts to preserve this historic relic, the tree fell in November, 1923.

"Under this tree," as the granite tablet says, "Washington first took command of the American army on July 3, 1775." This image is from a photograph taken around 1900. Despite the greatest efforts to protect this historic relic, the tree fell in November 1923.

© U & U

© U & U

 

Measures to form a continental army.

On the 29th of September, at the earnest solicitation of General Washington, a committee had been appointed by congress, with directions to repair to the camp at Cambridge; there to consult with the Commander-in-chief, and with the chief magistrates of New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, and the council of Massachusetts, "on the most effectual method of continuing, supporting, and regulating a continental army." On the return of this committee, congress determined that the new army should consist of twenty thousand three hundred and seventy-two men, including officers; to be raised as far as practicable from the troops already in service. Unfortunately, in constituting this first military establishment of the union, an essential error was committed; the consequences of which ceased only with the war. The soldiers, instead of being engaged for an unlimited time, were enlisted for the term of only one year, if not sooner discharged by congress. It is not easy to account entirely for this fatal error. With their jealousy of a permanent army, were probably intermingled hopes that the war would not be of long duration, and fears that much difficulty would be encountered in prevailing on men to enter into engagements of unlimited extent. Perhaps the habits of the northern colonies, where it had been usual to raise men for a single campaign, may have contributed to this measure. Whatever may have been its motives, its consequences were of the most serious nature; and it brought the American cause, more than once, into real hazard.

On September 29th, at the strong request of General Washington, Congress appointed a committee to go to the camp at Cambridge. Their task was to consult with the Commander-in-Chief and the governors of New Hampshire, Connecticut, and Rhode Island, along with the council of Massachusetts, "on the best way to continue, support, and organize a continental army." Upon the committee's return, Congress decided that the new army would consist of twenty thousand three hundred and seventy-two men, including officers; the recruits would be pulled from the troops already in service as much as possible. Unfortunately, in creating this first military structure of the union, a critical mistake was made, the effects of which lasted throughout the war. The soldiers were enlisted for just one year, or less if Congress discharged them earlier, instead of being engaged for an indefinite period. It's not easy to fully explain this significant error. Their distrust of a permanent army was likely mixed with the hope that the war wouldn't last long and the concern that it would be hard to convince men to commit for an unlimited time. Maybe the practices of the northern colonies, where it was common to raise men for a single campaign, influenced this decision. Regardless of the reasons behind it, the consequences were serious and put the American cause in real danger more than once.

Other resolutions accompanied that for raising and establishing the new army, which exhibit the perilous condition of the country, and its want of those means, which were indispensable to the support of the arduous conflict in which it was engaged.

Other resolutions came along with the one for creating and setting up the new army, showing the dangerous situation of the country and its lack of the necessary resources that were essential for supporting the tough struggle it was involved in.

One resolution ordered the detention, at a valuation, of the arms of those soldiers who should refuse to re-enlist, although they were private property, and but ill adapted to military purposes; another, offered two dollars to every recruit who would supply himself with a blanket; a third, ordered the purchase of any cloths which could be procured, without regard to colour, to be delivered to the soldiers, after deducting the price from their pay; and a fourth, required the soldiers to furnish their own arms, or to pay for the use of those which might be supplied by the government.

One resolution required the confiscation, at a set value, of the weapons of any soldier who refused to re-enlist, even though they were personal property and not very useful for military purposes; another offered two dollars to every recruit who would provide their own blanket; a third ordered the purchase of any available fabrics, regardless of color, to be given to the soldiers, with the cost deducted from their pay; and a fourth required soldiers to supply their own weapons or pay for the use of those supplied by the government.

October 22.

Before the arrangements made by the committee were confirmed by congress, General Washington proceeded to take the preparatory steps for carrying them into execution.

Before the committee's arrangements were approved by Congress, General Washington began to take the necessary steps to implement them.

It being understood that the engagements of the officers, as well as of the soldiers, would expire with the year; the whole army was to be formed anew. The officers therefore were required to signify in writing to their respective colonels, their determination to leave, or to continue in the service; that it might be communicated to congress through the officer commanding brigades.

It was understood that the contracts of both the officers and soldiers would end with the year, so the entire army would need to be reformed. Thus, the officers were required to inform their respective colonels in writing whether they planned to leave or stay in service, so this could be communicated to Congress through the brigade commanders.

Difficulty of re-enlisting the army.

The urgency of the case could not produce a compliance with these orders. Many disregarded them; and others annexed conditions to their remaining in the service. Repetitions of them became necessary; and an unconditional declaration was required.[15] But that high spirit and enthusiastic ardour, which had brought such numbers into the field after the battle of Lexington, was already beginning to dissipate; and that alacrity for the service, which had been expected, was not displayed. The orders of the day contain the most animating exhortations to the army, and the strongest appeals to its patriotism; but there was an ominous hesitation in forming new engagements.

The urgency of the situation couldn’t get everyone to follow these orders. Many ignored them, while others added conditions to their continued service. It became necessary to repeat the orders, and a straightforward declaration was needed.[15] But that high spirit and enthusiastic zeal, which had drawn so many into action after the battle of Lexington, was already starting to fade; and the eagerness for service that had been anticipated was not evident. The daily orders included the most motivating encouragements for the army and strong appeals to their patriotism; however, there was a troubling hesitation in committing to new agreements.

November 12.

At length, with much labour, the officers were arranged, upon which, recruiting orders were issued. But the sufferings of the army for fuel, clothes, and even provisions, had been great; and to this cause may be attributed the tardiness with which the soldiers in camp enrolled themselves. One officer from each company was employed to recruit in the country; but their progress was not such as the crisis demanded; and the army was dissolving by the expiration of the time for which it had been enlisted. The impatience of the soldiers to revisit their friends, overcame all their solicitude for maintaining the blockade of Boston; and it was with great difficulty that those entitled to a discharge were detained in camp even for ten days; at the end of which time a body of militia was expected to supply their places. This fact, however, did not convince the governments of the United Colonies, that it was possible to rely too much on individual patriotism; and that the American cause, if defended entirely by temporary armies, must be often exposed to imminent hazard.

Eventually, after a lot of effort, the officers were organized, and recruitment orders were issued. However, the army experienced significant shortages of fuel, clothing, and even food, which contributed to the slow rate at which soldiers in camp signed up. One officer from each company was tasked with recruiting from the local area, but their progress didn't meet the urgent needs of the situation, and the army began to disband as the enlistment periods were running out. The soldiers' eagerness to return to their families overshadowed their commitment to maintaining the blockade of Boston, and it was very challenging to keep those eligible for discharge in camp, even for an additional ten days; after that, a group of militia was expected to take their places. This, however, did not convince the governments of the United Colonies that they could rely too much on individual patriotism; they recognized that if the American cause depended solely on temporary armies, it would often be at serious risk.

November 30.

Perceiving the difficulty of recruiting the army, the General earnestly recommended to congress, to try the effect of a bounty. This proposition was not adopted until late in January; and, on the last day of December, when all the old troops, not engaged on the new establishment, were disbanded, only nine thousand six hundred and fifty men had been enlisted for the army of 1776; many of whom were unavoidably permitted to be absent on furlough. Their numbers, however, were considerably augmented during the winter; and, in the mean time, the militia cheerfully complied with the requisitions made on them.

Seeing the trouble in recruiting for the army, the General strongly suggested to Congress that they try offering a bounty. This idea wasn't adopted until late January; on the last day of December, when all the old troops not involved in the new setup were disbanded, only nine thousand six hundred and fifty men had signed up for the army of 1776, many of whom were understandably allowed to be away on leave. However, their numbers grew significantly over the winter, and in the meantime, the militia willingly responded to the requests made of them.

December.

Notwithstanding these complicated difficulties and embarrassments, the General viewed with deep mortification the semblance of inactivity to which his situation compelled him to submit. In the commencement of the contest, while the minds of many were undetermined, it was of vast importance to secure the public confidence, and it was necessary to pay some attention even to the public caprice. The real difficulties under which he laboured were not generally known. His numbers were exaggerated, and his means of carrying on offensive operations were magnified. The expulsion of the British army from Boston had been long since anticipated by many; and those were not wanting, who endeavoured to spread discontent by insinuating that the Commander-in-chief was desirous of prolonging the war, in order to continue his own importance. To these symptoms of impatience, and to the consequences they might produce, he could not be insensible; but it was not in his power to silence such complaints, by disclosing to the world his real situation. His views still continued to be directed towards Boston; and, congress having manifested a disposition favourable to an attack on that place, the general officers had been again assembled, and had again advised unanimously against the measure. Supposing that fears for the safety of the town might embarrass the proceedings of the army, congress resolved, "that if General Washington and his council of war should be of opinion that a successful attack might be made on the troops in Boston, he should make it in any manner he might think expedient, notwithstanding the town and property in it might be thereby destroyed."

Despite these complicated difficulties and challenges, the General felt deeply embarrassed by the appearance of inactivity that his situation forced him to endure. At the beginning of the conflict, when many minds were uncertain, gaining public confidence was crucial, and it was necessary to pay attention to public whims. The real challenges he faced were not widely understood. His forces were exaggerated, and his ability to conduct offensive operations was overstated. Many had long expected the British army to be expelled from Boston, and some even tried to spread discontent by suggesting that the Commander-in-chief was eager to prolong the war to maintain his own importance. He was aware of these signs of impatience and the potential consequences they could produce, but he couldn't quiet such complaints by revealing his true situation. His focus remained on Boston; Congress, showing a readiness to support an attack on the city, had called the general officers together again, who unanimously advised against the plan. Fearing that concerns for the town's safety might complicate the army's actions, Congress decided that "if General Washington and his council of war believed a successful attack on the troops in Boston could be made, he should carry it out in any way he saw fit, even if it meant destroying the town and its property."

Plans for attacking Boston.

Whilst waiting for a favourable opportunity to execute this bold plan, the American general availed himself of the occasional aids received from the militia, to make advances on the besieged, and to seize positions which would favour ulterior operations. Ploughed Hill, Cobble Hill, and Lechmere's Point, were successively occupied and fortified. His approaches were carried within half a mile of the works on Bunker's Hill; and his guns drove their floating batteries from their stations, and protected others constructed under his orders.

While waiting for a good chance to carry out this brave plan, the American general took advantage of the occasional help from the militia to make progress against the besieged and to take over positions that would benefit future operations. Ploughed Hill, Cobble Hill, and Lechmere's Point were successively occupied and fortified. His advances reached within half a mile of the defenses on Bunker's Hill; his cannons drove the enemy's floating batteries from their positions and protected others built under his command.

Hitherto, the object of the war had been a redress of grievances. The language, that it was a war against a corrupt administration, had been carefully observed; and allegiance to the British crown was universally avowed. The progress, however, of the public mind towards independence, though slow, was certain; and measures were necessarily taken, which apparently tended to that object. Among these, was the act of establishing temporary governments in place of that revolutionary system which followed the suspension of the ancient institutions.

So far, the goal of the war had been to address grievances. It was emphasized that this was a war against a corrupt administration, and loyalty to the British crown was openly declared. However, the shift in public opinion towards independence, though gradual, was inevitable; and steps were taken that seemed to support that goal. One of these steps was the establishment of temporary governments to replace the revolutionary system that came after the suspension of the old institutions.

The first application on this subject was made by Massachusetts;[16] and her example was soon followed by other colonies. These applications could not fail to draw forth the sentiments of members on the very interesting question of separation from the mother country. They who wished to lead public opinion to independence, were desirous of establishing a regular government in each province, entirely competent to the administration of its affairs; while they who were hostile to that event, opposed every measure which might either incline the colonies towards it, or strengthen the opinion in Great Britain, that it was the real object of all who had resisted the legislative supremacy of parliament. A resolution was with difficulty obtained in the case of New Hampshire, which formed a precedent for others of the same nature, recommending to the provincial convention to call a full and free representation of the people, who should establish such form of government as would best promote the general happiness, and most effectually secure peace and good order in the colony, during the continuance of the present dispute with Great Britain. Without this last clause, which still maintained the appearance of preserving the ancient connexion with the parent state, the recommendation would not have been made. About the same time, congress also resolved that it would be extremely dangerous to the liberties and welfare of America, for any colony separately to petition the king or either house of parliament.

The first action on this topic was taken by Massachusetts;[16] and soon after, other colonies started to follow suit. These actions inevitably sparked discussions among members about the important issue of separating from the mother country. Those who wanted to sway public opinion toward independence aimed to establish a proper government in each province that could fully handle its own affairs. On the other hand, those who opposed this idea resisted any steps that might lead the colonies closer to independence or strengthen the belief in Great Britain that it was the true goal of everyone who opposed Parliament's authority. A resolution was reluctantly reached in New Hampshire, which set a precedent for similar actions, recommending that the provincial convention call for a full and open representation of the people to create a government that would best promote general happiness and effectively maintain peace and order in the colony during the ongoing dispute with Great Britain. Without this last clause, which still gave the appearance of keeping the old connection with the parent state, the recommendation would not have been made. Around the same time, Congress also resolved that it would be extremely risky for any colony to petition the king or either house of Parliament separately, as it could endanger the liberties and well-being of America.

Having taken into consideration a proclamation, declaring certain persons in the colonies to have forgotten their allegiance, and to be in a state of open rebellion, and threatening with punishment those who should be found carrying on correspondence with them;—congress declared, "in the name of the people of these United Colonies, and by the authority according to the purest maxims of representation derived from them, that whatever punishment shall be inflicted upon any persons in the power of their enemies, for favouring, aiding, or abetting the cause of American liberty, shall be retaliated in the same kind, and in the same degree, upon those in their power, who have favoured, aided, or abetted, or shall favour, aid, or abet the system of ministerial oppression."

Having considered a proclamation that stated certain people in the colonies had abandoned their loyalty and were in open rebellion, and that there would be consequences for anyone found communicating with them, Congress declared, "In the name of the people of these United Colonies and by the authority derived from the highest principles of representation, any punishment inflicted on individuals under enemy control for supporting American liberty will be reciprocated in kind and to the same extent on those under our control who have supported or will support the oppressive actions of the government."

The British army, the command of which, on the recall of General Gage, had devolved upon General Howe, still remained inactive in Boston; and was still closely blocked up on the land side. The history of this winter campaign, is a history of successive struggles on the part of the American general, with the difficulties imposed by the want of arms, ammunition, and permanent troops, on a person extremely solicitous, by some grand and useful achievement, to prove himself worthy of the high station to which the voice of his country had called him.

The British army, which was now under General Howe after General Gage was recalled, remained inactive in Boston and was still tightly blocked on the land side. The story of this winter campaign is about the continuous challenges faced by the American general due to shortages of weapons, ammunition, and permanent troops. He was very eager to prove himself worthy of the high position that his country had given him through some significant and meaningful achievement.

1776
January.

Considering the resolution relative to the attack on Boston as indicating the desire of congress on that subject, he assured the president that an attempt would be made to put it in execution the first moment he should perceive a probability of success. If this should not occur, as soon as might be expected or wished, he prayed that his situation might be recollected, and that congress would do him the justice to believe, that circumstances, not inclination on his part, occasioned the delay. "It is not," said he, "in the pages of history to furnish a case like ours. To maintain a post within musket shot of the enemy for six months together, without ammunition; and at the same time, to disband one army and recruit another, within that distance of twenty-odd British regiments, is more than, probably, ever was attempted. But if we succeed as well in the latter, as we have hitherto done in the former, I shall think it the most fortunate event of my whole life."

Considering the resolution related to the attack on Boston as reflecting Congress's intent on that matter, he assured the president that he would try to put it into action the first time he saw a chance of success. If that didn't happen as soon as expected or desired, he hoped that his situation would be remembered, and that Congress would have the fairness to believe that circumstances, not his own desire, caused the delay. "It is not," he said, "in the pages of history to find a case like ours. Maintaining a position within musket range of the enemy for six months without ammunition, and at the same time disbanding one army and recruiting another, within that distance of twenty-odd British regiments, is probably more than has ever been attempted. But if we are as successful in the latter as we have been in the former, I will consider it the most fortunate event of my entire life."

In the month of January a council of war, at which Mr. John Adams, a member of congress, and Mr. Warren, president of the provincial congress of Massachusetts, assisted: Resolved, "that a vigorous attempt ought to be made on the ministerial troops in Boston, before they can be reinforced in the spring, if the means can be provided, and a favourable opportunity should offer." It was farther advised, "that thirteen regiments of militia should be asked for from Massachusetts and the neighbouring colonies, in order to put the army in a condition to make the attempt. The militia to assemble on the first of February, and to continue in service, if necessary, until the first of March." The colonies readily complied with these requisitions; but so mild had the season hitherto been, that the waters about Boston continued open. "Congress would discover in my last," said the general, on the nineteenth of January, "my motives for strengthening these lines with militia. But whether, as the weather turns out exceedingly mild, (insomuch as to promise nothing favourable from ice,) and there is no appearance of powder, I shall be able to attempt any thing decisive, time only can determine. No man upon earth wishes to destroy the nest in Boston more than I do; no person would be willing to go greater lengths than I shall to accomplish it, if it shall be thought adviseable; but if we have no powder to bombard with, nor ice to pass on, we shall be in no better situation than we have been all the year: we shall be in a worse, as their works are stronger."

In January, a war council took place, attended by Mr. John Adams, a member of Congress, and Mr. Warren, president of the Massachusetts provincial congress. They resolved, "a strong attempt needs to be made against the ministerial troops in Boston before they can be reinforced in the spring, if we can find the means and a favorable opportunity arises." It was further suggested, "that thirteen regiments of militia should be requested from Massachusetts and the neighboring colonies to prepare the army for the assault. The militia should gather on February 1st and remain active, if necessary, until March 1st." The colonies quickly agreed to these requests; however, the weather had been so mild that the waters around Boston stayed open. "Congress would see my reasons for strengthening these lines with militia in my last communication," the general said on January 19th. "But whether I'll be able to make any decisive moves, given the unusually mild weather (which offers no favorable conditions for ice) and the lack of gunpowder, only time will tell. No one wishes to uproot the stronghold in Boston more than I do; no one would go further than I would to achieve it, if it seems advisable. But without gunpowder to bombard them with or ice to cross, we'll remain in no better position than we have been all year: in fact, we'll be worse off, as their fortifications have become stronger."

General Lee detached to New York.

Early in January, the Commander-in-chief received unquestionable intelligence that an armament was equipping in Boston, to sail under General Clinton on a secret expedition. Many considerations induced him to believe that New York was its destination. He thought the possession of the Hudson of great importance to the British: and that the numerous adherents to the royal cause in New York, furnished an additional reason for transferring the seat of war to that colony. Whilst deliberating on this subject, he received a letter from General Lee, requesting to be detached to Connecticut, for the purpose of assembling a body of volunteers, who should march into New York, and be employed both for the security of that place, and the expulsion or suppression of a band of tories collecting on Long Island. Though inclined to the adoption of this measure, delicacy towards those who exercised the powers of civil government in the colony, suspended his decision on it. Mr. John Adams, who possessed great and well merited influence, was then at Watertown, attending the provincial convention; and with him, the general held some communications respecting his powers. That gentleman being decidedly of opinion that they extended to the case, General Lee was detached, with instructions to raise a body of volunteers in Connecticut, to reinforce the battalions of New Jersey and New York, which were placed under his command. His orders were to proceed to New York; to examine the fortifications of the city, and up the river; to put them in the best possible state of defence; to disarm all persons whose conduct rendered them justly suspected of designs unfriendly to the government, especially those on Long Island; and to collect the arms and ammunition in their possession, for the use of the army.

Early in January, the Commander-in-Chief received reliable information that an armament was being prepared in Boston to sail under General Clinton on a secret mission. He believed that New York was its destination for several reasons. He considered the control of the Hudson River crucial for the British and noted that the many supporters of the royal cause in New York provided an additional motive to shift the center of conflict to that region. While he was thinking about this matter, he got a letter from General Lee, asking to be sent to Connecticut to gather a group of volunteers to march into New York and be tasked with both securing the city and dealing with a group of loyalists assembling on Long Island. Although he was inclined to agree to this plan, he hesitated out of respect for those in charge of the civil government in the colony. Mr. John Adams, who had significant and well-deserved influence, was in Watertown attending the provincial convention, and the general had some discussions with him regarding his authority. Adams strongly believed that this situation fell within those powers, so General Lee was sent out with instructions to enlist volunteers in Connecticut to reinforce the battalions from New Jersey and New York under his command. His orders were to go to New York, inspect the city's fortifications and those along the river, improve them for defense, disarm anyone whose actions suggested they were hostile to the government—especially those on Long Island—and collect any weapons and ammunition they had for the army's use.

No difficulty was found in raising the volunteers required from Connecticut. The people of that province were zealous and enterprising, and Governor Trumbull having sanctioned the measure, troops were immediately embodied, and Lee commenced his march for New York at the head of twelve hundred men.

No trouble was encountered in recruiting the volunteers needed from Connecticut. The people in that area were eager and resourceful, and with Governor Trumbull's approval of the plan, troops were quickly assembled. Lee then started his march for New York leading twelve hundred men.

The inhabitants of that place were much alarmed at his approach. Captain Parker of the Asia man of war had threatened that he would destroy the town in the event of its being entered by any considerable body of provincials; and it was believed that these threats would be executed.

The people in that area were very worried when he arrived. Captain Parker of the Asia warship had warned that he would destroy the town if any significant group of locals entered it, and many believed he would follow through on those threats.

A committee of safety, which had been appointed to exercise the powers of government during the recess of the provincial congress, addressed a letter to General Lee, expressing astonishment at the report that he was about to enter the town without previously intimating his design, and pressing him earnestly not to pass the confines of Connecticut, until they could have further explanations with him.

A safety committee, which had been set up to manage government powers while the provincial congress was on break, sent a letter to General Lee. They expressed their surprise at the news that he was planning to enter the town without giving any advance notice and strongly urged him not to cross into Connecticut until they could discuss things further with him.

Holding in utter contempt the threats of Captain Parker, Lee continued his march; and, in a letter[17] to congress, represented in such strong terms the impolicy of leaving the military arrangements for New York under the control of the local government, that congress appointed three of their own body, to consult with him and the council of safety, respecting the defence of the place; and instructed him to obey the directions of that committee.

Holding Captain Parker's threats in complete disdain, Lee pressed on with his march. In a letter[17] to Congress, he strongly argued against letting the local government manage military operations in New York. As a result, Congress appointed three of its members to work with him and the council of safety on the area's defense and instructed him to follow their committee's orders.

Lee soon acquired that ascendancy which is the prerogative of a superior mind, over those who were sent for his government, and they directed him to execute whatever he suggested. A plan recommended by him, for fortifying the city and preserving its connexion with Long Island, was adopted, and prosecuted with vigour.

Lee soon gained the authority that comes with a superior mind over those who were appointed to govern him, and they followed his suggestions. A plan he proposed for strengthening the city and maintaining its connection with Long Island was accepted and pursued with enthusiasm.

General Clinton arrived almost at the same instant with General Lee, but without troops. He said openly, that none were coming; that no hostilities were contemplated against New York; and that he was, himself, merely on a visit to his friend Tryon. "If it be really so," added General Lee, in his letter containing this communication, "it is the most whimsical piece of civility I ever heard of." General Clinton did not affect to conceal that his real object was to proceed to North Carolina, where he expected that five regiments from Europe would join the small force he should carry with him.

General Clinton arrived almost at the same time as General Lee, but without any troops. He openly stated that none were coming, that there were no plans for attacks on New York, and that he was just visiting his friend Tryon. "If this is really true," added General Lee in his letter that included this information, "it's the most bizarre act of politeness I've ever heard." General Clinton didn’t hide the fact that his actual goal was to head to North Carolina, where he expected that five regiments from Europe would join the small force he was bringing with him.

About the middle of February, the cold was intense, and the ice became sufficiently firm to bear the troops. General Washington was now disposed to execute the bold plan he had formed, of attacking General Howe in Boston; but a council of war being almost unanimous against the measure, it was abandoned. The want of ammunition for the artillery was a principal inducement to this opinion.

About the middle of February, the cold was severe, and the ice was strong enough to support the troops. General Washington was ready to go through with his daring plan to attack General Howe in Boston; however, a council of war was almost unanimously against it, so the idea was dropped. The lack of ammunition for the artillery was a major reason for this decision.

The attempt, probably, would not have succeeded, and must certainly have been attended with considerable loss. But the advice of the council seems to have been adopted with regret. In communicating their opinion to congress, the general observed, "Perhaps the irksomeness of my situation may have given different ideas to me, from those which influence the gentlemen I consulted; and might have inclined me to put more to the hazard than was consistent with prudence. If it had this effect, I am not sensible of it, as I endeavoured to give the subject all the consideration a matter of such importance required. True it is, and I can not help acknowledging, that I have many disagreeable sensations on account of my situation; for, to have the eyes of the whole continent fixed on me, with anxious expectation of hearing some great event, and to be restrained in every military operation for want of the necessary means to carry it on, is not very pleasing; especially as the means used to conceal my weakness from the enemy, conceal it also from our friends, and add to their wonder."

The attempt probably wouldn't have worked out, and it definitely would have resulted in significant losses. However, it seems that the council's advice was reluctantly accepted. When sharing their thoughts with Congress, the general remarked, "Maybe the frustration of my situation has led me to think differently than the gentlemen I consulted, and might have pushed me to take more risks than was wise. If that’s the case, I’m not aware of it, as I tried to give the issue the careful thought it deserves. It’s true, and I can't deny it, that I have a lot of uncomfortable feelings about my situation; it's not pleasant to have the eyes of the whole continent on me, anxiously waiting to hear about some great event, while being limited in every military action due to a lack of necessary resources. This is especially frustrating since the very efforts made to hide my weaknesses from the enemy also keep them hidden from our friends, which only adds to their confusion."

Late in February, various appearances among the British troops indicated an intention to evacuate Boston; but as these appearances might be deceptive, and he had now received a small supply of powder, General Washington determined to prosecute vigorously a plan he had formed, to force General Howe either to come to an action, or to abandon the town.

Late in February, different signs among the British troops suggested they intended to evacuate Boston. However, since these signs could be misleading, and he had recently received a small supply of gunpowder, General Washington decided to actively pursue a plan he had developed to either force General Howe into a confrontation or to make him leave the town.

Since the allowance of a bounty, recruiting had been more successful; and the regular force had been augmented to rather more than fourteen thousand men. In addition to these troops, the Commander-in-chief had called to his aid about six thousand of the militia of Massachusetts. Thus reinforced, he determined to take possession of the heights of Dorchester, and to fortify them. As the possession of this post would enable him to annoy the ships in the harbour and the soldiers in the town, he was persuaded that a general action would ensue. But if this hope should be disappointed, his purpose was to make the works on the heights of Dorchester only preparatory to seizing and fortifying Nook's Hill, and the points opposite the south end of Boston, which commanded the harbour, a great part of the town, and the beach from which an embarkation must take place in the event of a retreat.

Since the introduction of a bounty, recruiting had seen more success, and the regular army had grown to over fourteen thousand men. Alongside these troops, the Commander-in-chief had called in about six thousand militia members from Massachusetts. With these reinforcements, he decided to take control of the heights of Dorchester and fortify them. Holding this position would allow him to target the ships in the harbor and the soldiers in the town, and he believed this would lead to a major battle. However, if that expectation didn't pan out, his plan was to make the fortifications on the heights of Dorchester a step toward capturing and fortifying Nook's Hill and the areas opposite the south end of Boston, which overlooked the harbor, a large part of the town, and the beach that would be critical for an evacuation if they needed to retreat.

March.
Possession taken of the heights of Dorchester.

To facilitate the execution of this plan, a heavy bombardment and cannonade were commenced on the town and on the British lines, which were repeated the two succeeding nights. On the last of them, immediately after the firing had begun, a strong detachment, under the command of General Thomas, took possession of the heights without opposition. Such was their activity and industry through the night that, although the ground was almost impenetrable, the works were sufficiently advanced by the morning, nearly to cover them. When day-light disclosed their operations to the British, a considerable degree of embarrassment appeared, and an ineffectual fire was commenced on the party in possession of the heights, who in turn opened a battery on the besieged; and continued with unremitting labour to strengthen their position.

To carry out this plan, a heavy bombardment and cannon fire began on the town and the British lines, which continued for the next two nights. On the last night, right after the firing started, a strong group led by General Thomas took control of the heights without facing any resistance. They worked quickly and tirelessly throughout the night, and even though the ground was nearly impossible to navigate, they made significant progress by morning, almost completely covering their position. When daylight revealed their actions to the British, they appeared quite confused, and they started an ineffective barrage on the soldiers holding the heights, who in turn opened fire on the besieged and kept working tirelessly to fortify their position.

March 5.

It was necessary to dislodge the Americans from the heights, or to evacuate the town; and General Howe, as had been foreseen, determined to embrace the former part of the alternative. Three thousand chosen men, to be commanded by Lord Percy, were ordered on this service. These troops were embarked, and fell down to the castle, in order to proceed up the river to the intended scene of action; but were scattered by a furious storm, which disabled them from immediately prosecuting the enterprise. Before they could again be in readiness for the attack, the works were made so strong, that the attempt to storm them was thought unadviseable, and the evacuation of the town became inevitable.

It was necessary to remove the Americans from the heights or to evacuate the town. As expected, General Howe decided to go with the first option. He ordered 3,000 selected men, to be led by Lord Percy, to carry out this task. These troops were deployed and moved down to the castle to head up the river to the planned area of action, but they were scattered by a fierce storm, which prevented them from immediately continuing the mission. Before they were ready to attack again, the fortifications became so strong that attempting to storm them was seen as unwise, making the evacuation of the town unavoidable.

In the expectation that the flower of the British troops would be employed against the heights of Dorchester, General Washington had concerted a plan for availing himself of that occasion, to attack Boston itself. The storm which defeated the proposed attack on the heights defeated this enterprise also.

In anticipation that the best of the British troops would be used against the heights of Dorchester, General Washington planned to take advantage of that opportunity to attack Boston itself. However, the storm that thwarted the proposed attack on the heights also derailed this plan.

Boston evacuated.
March 17.

The determination to evacuate Boston was soon communicated. A paper signed by some of the select men of the town, and brought out with a flag, stated the fact. This paper was accompanied by propositions said to be made on the part of General Howe, but not signed by him, relative to the security of the town, and the peaceable embarkation of his army. As these propositions were not addressed to the Commander-in-chief, and were not authenticated by the signature of General Howe, nor by any act obligatory on him, General Washington thought it improper directly to notice them; and ordered the officer to whom they were delivered to return an answer stating the reasons why they were not treated with more attention. The determination, however, to continue his advances and to secure Nook's Hill, was changed; and considerable detachments were moved towards New York, before the actual evacuation of Boston. This event took place on the 17th of March; and, in a few days, the whole fleet sailed out of Nantasket road, directing its course eastward.

The decision to evacuate Boston was quickly communicated. A document signed by some of the town's selectmen and brought out with a flag stated this fact. This document was accompanied by proposals that were said to be made on behalf of General Howe, but not signed by him, regarding the security of the town and the peaceful departure of his army. Since these proposals were not addressed to the Commander-in-chief and lacked General Howe's signature or any binding act from him, General Washington thought it inappropriate to respond directly and instructed the officer who received them to reply with the reasons for not giving them more attention. However, the plan to continue advancing and to secure Nook's Hill changed, and significant detachments were moved toward New York before Boston was actually evacuated. This event occurred on the 17th of March; within a few days, the entire fleet sailed out of Nantasket road, heading eastward.

The recovery of this important town gave great joy to the United Colonies. Congress passed a vote of thanks to the General and his army, "for their wise and spirited conduct in the siege and acquisition of Boston;" and directed a medal of gold to be struck in commemoration of the event.

The recovery of this important town brought great joy to the United Colonies. Congress passed a vote of thanks to the General and his army "for their wise and spirited conduct in the siege and acquisition of Boston," and ordered a gold medal to be created to commemorate the event.

As soon as the British fleet had put to sea, the American army proceeded by divisions to New York, where it arrived on the 14th of April.

As soon as the British fleet set sail, the American army moved in divisions to New York, where it arrived on April 14th.

During the siege of Boston, an altercation concerning prisoners took place between the commanders of the respective armies, which was viewed with great interest throughout America. The character of the war—a war between a sovereign and those who professed to be his subjects, led to a course of conduct on the part of the British General, which the actual state of things did not justify.

During the siege of Boston, a conflict over prisoners occurred between the leaders of both armies, which was closely followed across America. The nature of the war—a conflict between a ruler and those who claimed to be his subjects—resulted in actions by the British General that the current situation did not warrant.

General Gage, as Governor of Massachusetts, had received all the irritations of which his mind was susceptible—irritations which seemed to have had no inconsiderable influence over his conduct as Commander-in-chief. He regarded the Americans nearly as rebels; and treated them as if the great national resistance they were making on principle, was to be viewed as the act of a few daring and turbulent individuals, rising against laws of unquestionable obligation, who would soon be quelled, and punished for their disobedience of legitimate authority. In this spirit, he threw some distinguished gentlemen of Boston, and the American officers and soldiers who fell into his hands, into the common jail of felons; and treated them, without respect to military rank or condition, not as prisoners of war, but as state criminals.

General Gage, as the Governor of Massachusetts, had faced all the frustrations that affected him—frustrations that seemed to have significantly influenced his behavior as Commander-in-chief. He viewed the Americans mostly as rebels and treated them as if their strong national resistance, driven by principle, was just the action of a few bold and unruly individuals standing against laws that were indisputably valid, who would soon be suppressed and punished for disobeying legitimate authority. In this mindset, he imprisoned some prominent gentlemen from Boston, as well as the American officers and soldiers who fell into his hands, in the common jail for criminals; and he treated them, regardless of their military rank or status, not as prisoners of war, but as state criminals.

Correspondence respecting prisoners.

General Washington remonstrated very seriously against this unjustifiable measure. Considering political opinion entirely out of the question, and "conceiving the obligations of humanity, and the claims of rank, to be universally binding, except in the case of retaliation;" he expressed the hope he had entertained, "that they would have induced, on the part of the British General, a conduct more conformable to the rights they gave." While he claimed the benefits of these rights, he declared his determination "to be regulated entirely, in his conduct towards the prisoners who should fall into his hands, by the treatment which those in the power of the British General should receive."

General Washington strongly protested against this unjust action. Setting aside political opinions and believing that the obligations of humanity and the claims of rank should always apply, except in cases of retaliation, he expressed his hope that they would lead the British General to act in a way that respected the rights they entitled. While he acknowledged these rights, he stated his commitment to base his treatment of any prisoners he captured entirely on how those held by the British General were treated.

To this letter, a haughty and intemperate answer was returned, retorting the complaints concerning the treatment of prisoners, and affecting to consider it as an instance of clemency, that the cord was not applied to those whose imprisonment was complained of. To this answer, General Washington gave a manly and dignified reply, which was, he said, "to close their correspondence perhaps forever;" and which concluded with saying, "If your officers, our prisoners, receive from me a treatment different from what I wished to show them, they and you will remember the occasion of it."

To this letter, an arrogant and extreme response was given, countering the complaints about how prisoners were treated and pretending to view it as an act of mercy that the noose wasn't used on those whose imprisonment was questioned. In response, General Washington replied in a strong and dignified manner, stating it was "to possibly end their correspondence forever;" and concluded by saying, "If your officers, our prisoners, receive treatment from me that's different from what I intended to show them, they and you will remember why."

The result of this correspondence was communicated to the council of Massachusetts,[18] who were requested to order the British officers then on parole to be confined in close jail, and the soldiers to be sent to such place of security as the general court should direct.

The outcome of this correspondence was shared with the council of Massachusetts,[18] who were asked to order that the British officers currently on parole be locked up in a secure jail, and the soldiers be sent to a safe location as directed by the general court.

On the recall of General Gage, the command devolved on General Howe, whose conduct was less exceptionable; and this rigorous treatment of prisoners was relaxed.

On General Gage's recall, command passed to General Howe, whose approach was less problematic; and this strict treatment of prisoners was eased.

Not long after this correspondence with General Gage, while Montgomery was employed in the siege of St. John's, Colonel Ethan Allen was captured in a bold and rash attempt on Montreal. Under the pretext of his having acted without authority, he was put in irons, and sent to England as a traitor.

Not long after this exchange with General Gage, while Montgomery was busy with the siege of St. John's, Colonel Ethan Allen was taken prisoner during a daring and reckless effort to seize Montreal. He was put in chains under the pretense that he acted without permission and was sent to England as a traitor.

While he was yet in Canada, congress requested the Commander-in-chief to inquire into the fact. He addressed a letter to Sir William Howe, requiring explanations on it, and assuring him that General Prescot, who had been taken in Canada, and was understood to have contributed to the severities inflicted on Colonel Allen, should receive exactly the fate of that officer.

While he was still in Canada, Congress asked the Commander-in-Chief to look into the matter. He wrote a letter to Sir William Howe, asking for explanations and letting him know that General Prescot, who had been captured in Canada and was believed to have played a role in the harsh treatment of Colonel Allen, should face the same consequences as that officer.

General Howe, not holding any authority in Canada, or not choosing to enter fully into this subject, General Schuyler was directed to make particular inquiries into the conduct of Prescot; and congress, on being informed of the inefficacy of the application to General Howe, ordered that officer into close jail.

General Howe, having no authority in Canada, or choosing not to fully engage with this issue, directed General Schuyler to investigate the actions of Prescot; and Congress, upon learning that their appeal to General Howe was ineffective, ordered that officer to be put in close confinement.


CHAPTER III.

Invasion of Canada meditated.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's capitulated.... Montreal surrenders.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives before Quebec.... Retires to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.... Unsuccessful attack on that place.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes command of the army.... The blockade raised.... General Sullivan takes the command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada evacuated.... General Carleton constructs a fleet.... Enters lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes possession of Crown Point.... Retires into winter quarters.

Invasion of Canada planned.... Siege of St. John's.... Capture of Fort Chamblée.... Carleton defeated at Longueisle.... St. John's surrendered.... Montreal falls.... Arnold's expedition.... He arrives at Quebec.... Retreats to Point Aux Trembles.... Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.... Failed attack on that place.... Death of Montgomery.... Blockade of Quebec.... General Thomas takes charge of the army.... The blockade lifted.... General Sullivan takes command.... Battle of the Three Rivers.... Canada evacuated.... General Carleton builds a fleet.... Enters Lake Champlain.... Defeats the American flotilla.... Takes over Crown Point.... Enters winter quarters.

 

1775

During these transactions, events of great interest were passing still further north.

During these transactions, significant events were unfolding even further north.

Serious dissatisfaction prevailed in Canada. The measures of administration had disquieted the British settlers, without conciliating the ancient inhabitants. At the same time, the regular troops had been chiefly ordered to Boston, and the province left almost entirely undefended. These facts were known in the United Colonies. It was also known that military stores to an immense amount had been deposited in Quebec, and that preparations were making to invade the colonies from that quarter. The possession of that country was believed to be all important; and its present temper countenanced the opinion, that its weight would be thrown into the scale of that party, which should first show a force in it sufficient for the protection of its inhabitants. The facility with which Crown Point and Ticonderoga had been taken, and the command of the lakes George and Champlain acquired, added to the motives already stated, inspiring congress with the daring design of anticipating the plans meditated in Canada, by taking possession of that province.

Serious dissatisfaction was widespread in Canada. The government’s actions had upset the British settlers without winning over the native inhabitants. At the same time, most regular troops had been sent to Boston, leaving the province almost completely unprotected. These facts were known in the United Colonies. It was also known that a large amount of military supplies had been stored in Quebec and that preparations were underway to invade the colonies from that direction. Control of that region was considered crucial, and its current mood suggested that it would favor whichever side demonstrated enough strength to protect its residents first. The ease with which Crown Point and Ticonderoga had been captured, along with the control of Lake George and Lake Champlain, added to the reasons already mentioned, inspiring Congress with the bold plan to preemptively take control of that province before any hostile actions could be initiated from Canada.

Invasion of Canada meditated.

In June, 1775, a resolution passed that body, directing General Schuyler to repair to Ticonderoga, and take the proper measures for securing that post and Crown Point, and for retaining the command of the lakes. He was, at the same time authorized, if he should find the measure not disagreeable to the Canadians, to take possession of St. John's and Montreal, and to pursue any other steps which might have a tendency to promote the peace and security of the United Colonies.

In June 1775, a resolution was passed directing General Schuyler to go to Ticonderoga and take the necessary steps to secure that location and Crown Point, as well as to maintain control of the lakes. He was also authorized to take possession of St. John's and Montreal, as long as it was acceptable to the Canadians, and to pursue any other actions that could help promote the peace and security of the United Colonies.

Near three thousand men from New England and New York were designed for this service. A number of batteaux were directed to be built at Ticonderoga and Crown Point, to convey them along lake Champlain, and fifty thousand dollars in specie were voted for the expenses of the army in Canada.

Near three thousand men from New England and New York were assigned for this service. Several boats were ordered to be built at Ticonderoga and Crown Point to transport them along Lake Champlain, and fifty thousand dollars in cash were allocated for the expenses of the army in Canada.

General Schuyler, who was at New York when this important command was confided to him, hastened to Ticonderoga, in order to make the necessary arrangements for the enterprise.

General Schuyler, who was in New York when he was given this important command, quickly went to Ticonderoga to make the necessary arrangements for the mission.

The troops of that department, belonging to different colonies, stationed at different places, and acknowledging no one commanding officer, were found in a state of entire disorganization. The stores were misapplied, or wasted; no subordination nor camp discipline was observed; and had the enemy been in a condition to attempt a coup de main, Ticonderoga and Crown Point would have been lost, with as much facility as they had been acquired.

The troops in that department, coming from different colonies and stationed at various locations without a single commanding officer, were completely disorganized. Supplies were misused or wasted; there was no discipline or order in the camp; and if the enemy had been able to launch a surprise attack, Ticonderoga and Crown Point could have been lost just as easily as they had been gained.

September.

Schuyler immediately commenced the task of preparing vessels for the transportation of the troops; a task the more laborious and tedious, as the timber for the batteaux was then to be procured from the woods. Before the preparations were complete, or the soldiers destined for the expedition were assembled, the impatience expressed by the discontented in Canada rendered an immediate movement adviseable. Orders were therefore given to General Montgomery to embark with the troops then in readiness; and General Schuyler having directed the expected reinforcements to rendezvous at the Isle Aux Noix, followed and joined him before he reached that place.

Schuyler immediately started the task of getting boats ready to transport the troops; a job that was even more difficult and time-consuming since the wood for the boats had to be sourced from the woods. Before the preparations were finished or the soldiers for the mission were gathered, the frustration shown by those unhappy in Canada made it clear that an immediate move was necessary. Orders were given to General Montgomery to set sail with the troops that were ready; and General Schuyler, having instructed the expected reinforcements to meet at Isle Aux Noix, followed and joined him before he arrived there.

The Americans enter that Province.

Circular letters to the Canadians, exhorting them to rouse and assert their liberties, and declaring, that the Americans entered their country, not as enemies, but as friends and protectors, were immediately dispersed among them; and to improve the favourable impression which had been made, it was determined to advance directly to St. John's. On the sixth of September, the American army, amounting to about one thousand men, entirely destitute of artillery, embarked on the Sorel, and proceeding down that river, landed within a mile and a half of the fort. The intelligence received during the evening, determined them to return to the Isle Aux Noix, and wait for their remaining troops and artillery.

Circular letters to the Canadians urged them to wake up and stand up for their rights, stating that the Americans entered their territory not as enemies, but as friends and protectors. These letters were quickly spread among the people; to build on the positive impression made, the decision was made to head straight to St. John's. On September 6th, the American army, consisting of about one thousand men and lacking artillery, boarded ships on the Sorel River. They traveled down the river and landed about a mile and a half from the fort. After receiving information that evening, they decided to return to Isle Aux Noix to wait for their remaining troops and artillery.

The Isle Aux Noix lies at the junction of the Sorel with lake Champlain; and to prevent the armed vessels at St. John's from entering the latter, a boom was drawn across the narrow channel, at the point of union between those waters.

The Isle Aux Noix is located where the Sorel River meets Lake Champlain; to keep the armed boats in St. John's from entering the lake, a boom was stretched across the narrow channel at the point where the two bodies of water meet.

While at that place, General Schuyler became so ill as to be confined to his bed; and the command devolved on Montgomery.

While he was there, General Schuyler got so sick that he had to stay in bed, and the command passed to Montgomery.

September 25.
Siege of St. Johns.

Late in September the artillery was brought up; and reinforcements arrived, which augmented the army to nearly two thousand men;—upon which Montgomery again proceeded to the investment of St. John's. This place was garrisoned by five or six hundred regulars, with about two hundred Canadian militia, and was well provided with artillery and military stores. The army of Canada, as well as the other armies of the United Colonies, was almost entirely without powder; and, of consequence, the siege advanced slowly. Its necessities in this respect were fortunately relieved by the capture of fort Chamblée, which being supposed to be covered by St. John's, was not in a defensible condition. October.Capture of Fort Chamblée.In this place, about one hundred and twenty barrels of gunpowder were taken, after which the siege of St. John's was prosecuted with vigour; but the garrison made a resolute defence, and for some time indulged the hope of being relieved.[19]

Late in September, the artillery was brought in, and reinforcements arrived, increasing the army to nearly two thousand men. Montgomery then continued the siege of St. John's. This place was held by five or six hundred regular soldiers, along with about two hundred Canadian militia, and was well stocked with artillery and military supplies. The army in Canada, like the other armies of the United Colonies, was almost completely out of gunpowder, which caused the siege to progress slowly. Thankfully, their needs were partially met by the capture of Fort Chamblée, which was thought to be covered by St. John's and wasn’t in a defensible state. October.Capture of Fort Chamblée. About one hundred and twenty barrels of gunpowder were taken from there, after which the siege of St. John's continued with more determination; however, the garrison put up a strong defense and for a while held onto the hope of being rescued.[19]

Carleton defeated at Longueisle.

Colonel M'Clean, a veteran officer, with his regiment of royal highland emigrants, and a few hundred Canadians, was posted near the junction of the Sorel with the St. Lawrence. General Carleton was at Montreal, where he had collected about a thousand men, chiefly Canadians. At the head of these troops, he hoped to effect a junction with M'Clean, after which he designed to march with his whole force against Montgomery, and endeavour to raise the siege; but, on attempting to cross over from Montreal, he was encountered and entirely defeated at Longueisle by a detachment of the American troops under Colonel Warner. Another party advanced on M'Clean. Being entirely abandoned by his Canadians so soon as they were informed of the defeat of the governor, and having also received information that Arnold was approaching Point Levi, M'Clean retreated to Quebec. The Americans occupied the post he had abandoned, and erected batteries on a point of land at the junction of the Sorel with the St. Lawrence; where they also constructed several armed rafts and floating batteries, in order to prevent Carleton with the vessels at Montreal from escaping down the river.

Colonel M'Clean, an experienced officer, was stationed with his regiment of royal highland emigrants and a few hundred Canadians near the confluence of the Sorel River and the St. Lawrence. General Carleton was in Montreal, where he had gathered about a thousand men, mostly Canadians. He hoped to merge his forces with M'Clean's and then march against Montgomery to lift the siege. However, when he tried to cross over from Montreal, he was met and completely defeated at Longueisle by a detachment of American troops led by Colonel Warner. Another group advanced on M'Clean. Faced with the complete withdrawal of his Canadian forces as soon as they heard about the governor's defeat, and having received news that Arnold was nearing Point Levi, M'Clean retreated to Quebec. The Americans took over the position he had vacated and set up batteries on a piece of land at the junction of the Sorel and the St. Lawrence; they also built armed rafts and floating batteries to block Carleton and the ships in Montreal from escaping downriver.

St. Johns capitulates.
November 3.

Montgomery was pressing the siege of St. John's with great vigour, and had advanced his works near the fort, when the account of the success at Longueisle reached him. On receiving this intelligence, he sent a flag by one of the prisoners, with a letter to Major Preston, the commanding officer, demanding a surrender of the place. All hopes of relief having now vanished, the garrison capitulated, on being allowed the honours of war.

Montgomery was vigorously continuing the siege of St. John's and had moved his positions close to the fort when he got the news of the success at Longueisle. After receiving this information, he sent a flag with one of the prisoners and a letter to Major Preston, the commanding officer, demanding the surrender of the fort. With all hope for relief now gone, the garrison surrendered, being granted the honors of war.

Scarcely was this first success obtained, when the consequences of short enlistments began to be felt. The time of service for which the troops had engaged being about to expire, great difficulty was experienced in prevailing on them to proceed farther; and before the General could induce them to march against Montreal, he was under the necessity of stipulating explicitly, that all who wished it should be discharged at that place. Having effected this compromise, he proceeded against Montreal; while his floating batteries, under Colonel Easton, advanced up the St. Lawrence, and not only prevented the armed vessels of the enemy from escaping to Quebec, but drove them still higher up the river.

Hardly had this first success been achieved when the effects of short enlistments started to be felt. As the soldiers' service time was about to end, it became very difficult to convince them to go any further; and before the General could get them to march toward Montreal, he had to agree that anyone who wanted to leave could do so at that location. After reaching this agreement, he moved against Montreal, while his floating batteries, led by Colonel Easton, advanced up the St. Lawrence, not only preventing the enemy's armed vessels from escaping to Quebec but also pushing them further up the river.

Montreal surrenders.
November 13.

Montreal was not in a condition to be defended. After engaging to allow the Canadians in their own laws, the free exercise of their religion, and the privilege of governing themselves, Montgomery took peaceable possession of the town; and Governor Carleton retired to his flotilla. While preparations were making to attack these vessels, the Governor was conveyed in a boat with muffled oars down the river, in a dark night, and made his escape to Quebec. The fleet soon afterwards surrendered, and the General prepared, with the utmost expedition, to proceed with the few troops who were willing to follow him, to the capital of Canada.

Montreal was not in a state to be defended. After promising to let the Canadians follow their own laws, practice their religion freely, and govern themselves, Montgomery took control of the town without conflict; Governor Carleton retreated to his fleet. While arrangements were being made to attack these ships, the Governor was quietly rowed down the river in a boat with muffled oars during a dark night and escaped to Quebec. Shortly after, the fleet surrendered, and the General got ready, as quickly as possible, to head to the capital of Canada with the few troops willing to follow him.

Diminished as his army was by the discharge of those who claimed the performance of his engagements made at St. John's, it was necessary to leave a part of it at Montreal, St. John's, and Chamblée to garrison those places—keep open the communication between Quebec and the United Colonies—preserve the dependence of the Canadians—overawe the Indians, and hold in check the garrisons above him at Detroit and Niagara. These essential objects, though provided for with the utmost possible economy of men, formed such deductions from his force, as to leave little more than three hundred soldiers to follow their General in the enterprise against Quebec.

Diminished as his army was by the discharge of those who claimed the performance of his agreements made at St. John's, it was necessary to leave a part of it in Montreal, St. John's, and Chamblée to garrison those places—keep the communication open between Quebec and the United Colonies—maintain the loyalty of the Canadians—intimidate the Indians, and monitor the garrisons above him at Detroit and Niagara. These crucial objectives, although managed with the utmost possible efficiency in terms of manpower, took such a toll on his force that only a little more than three hundred soldiers remained to follow their General in the campaign against Quebec.

August.

Foreseeing that the whole force of Canada would be concentrated about Montreal, General Washington had planned an expedition against Quebec, to be carried on by a detachment from his camp before Boston, which was to march by the way of Kennebec river; and, passing through the dreary wilderness lying between the settled parts of Maine and the St. Lawrence, to enter Canada about ninety miles below Montreal.

Foreseeing that all of Canada’s forces would be gathered around Montreal, General Washington planned an expedition against Quebec. This would be carried out by a group from his camp near Boston, which was to march along the Kennebec River. They would go through the bleak wilderness between the settled areas of Maine and the St. Lawrence River, entering Canada about ninety miles south of Montreal.

The object of this hardy enterprise was to compel Carleton, either to draw his troops from the upper country and leave the passage open to the army invading the province by the way of the river Sorel, or, if he should maintain that position, to take possession of Quebec. All his accounts assured him that this place was unable to hold out against the force which would appear before it; and, if attacked by an American army before the return of Carleton, would surrender without firing a shot.

The goal of this tough mission was to force Carleton to either pull his troops back from the northern region and leave the route clear for the army invading the province through the Sorel River, or, if he decided to stay put, to seize control of Quebec. All his reports confirmed that this location wouldn’t be able to withstand the army that would confront it; and if it was attacked by an American army before Carleton returned, it would give up without firing a shot.

This arduous enterprise was committed to Colonel Arnold. About a thousand men, consisting of New England infantry, some volunteers,[20] a company of artillery under Captain Lamb, and three companies of riflemen, were selected for the service.

This challenging mission was assigned to Colonel Arnold. About a thousand men, made up of infantry from New England, some volunteers,[20] a company of artillery led by Captain Lamb, and three companies of riflemen were chosen for the task.

Arnold's expedition by the way of the Kennebec.

Such delays in expediting this detachment were occasioned by the derangements of the army, that Arnold could not commence his march until the middle of September.

Such delays in moving this unit happened because of the army's disruptions, so Arnold couldn't start his march until the middle of September.

The success of the expedition depending in a great measure on the friendly temper of the province against which it was directed, the instructions given to Arnold earnestly inculcated the cultivation of a good understanding with the Canadians; and even enjoined an abandonment of the enterprise, should this sudden invasion of their country threaten to irritate them, and induce them to take up arms against the United Colonies. He was furnished with about one thousand pounds in specie to defray contingent expenses, and with a cargo of manifestoes to be dispersed through Canada.

The success of the expedition depended significantly on the friendly attitude of the province it targeted, so the instructions given to Arnold strongly emphasized the importance of building a good relationship with the Canadians. They even insisted that he should abandon the mission if this sudden invasion of their territory seemed likely to upset them and encourage them to fight against the United Colonies. He was provided with about one thousand pounds in cash to cover unexpected expenses and with a shipment of pamphlets to distribute throughout Canada.

The opinion which had been formed of the favourable disposition of the Canadians was not disproved by the event. They gave essential aid to the Americans, and cheerfully facilitated their march through that province. But the previous difficulties to be surmounted were much greater than had been apprehended. The intermediate country, which had never been well explored, opposed obstacles to the march, which only perseverance like that of Arnold and of his brave and hardy followers, could have conquered. Colonel Enos, who commanded the rear division, consisting of one third of the detachment, returned from the Dead River, a branch of the Kennebec. At first, his appearance excited the utmost indignation in the army; yet, on being arrested, he was acquitted by a court martial, on the principle that it was absolutely impracticable to obtain provisions on the route to preserve the troops from perishing with famine.

The view that people had of the friendly attitude of the Canadians was proven correct. They provided crucial support to the Americans and willingly helped them move through the province. However, the challenges they faced were much greater than expected. The territory in between, which had never been thoroughly explored, posed obstacles to the advance that only the determination of Arnold and his brave, tough followers could overcome. Colonel Enos, who led the rear division made up of a third of the group, returned from the Dead River, a branch of the Kennebec. At first, his arrival caused outrage within the army; however, when he was court-martialed, he was cleared based on the understanding that it was completely unrealistic to expect to find supplies on the route to keep the soldiers from starving.

Arnold, who at the head of the first two divisions, still prosecuted his march, was thirty-two days traversing a hideous wilderness, without seeing a house, or any thing human. Notwithstanding the zealous and wonderfully persevering exertions of his men, the obstacles he encountered so protracted his march, that he did not reach the first settlements on the Chaudière, which empties itself into the St. Lawrence, near Quebec, until the 3d of November.

Arnold, leading the first two divisions, continued his march for thirty-two days through a terrible wilderness, without seeing a house or any signs of human life. Despite the enthusiastic and remarkably persistent efforts of his men, the challenges he faced delayed their progress, and they didn't reach the first settlements on the Chaudière, which flows into the St. Lawrence near Quebec, until November 3rd.

On the high grounds which separate the waters of the Kennebec from those of the St. Lawrence, the scanty remnant of provisions was divided among the companies; each of which was directed, without attempting to preserve any connexion with the other, to march with the utmost possible celerity into the inhabited country. Whilst those who gained the front were yet thirty miles from the first poor and scattered habitations which composed that frontier of Canada, their last morsel of food was consumed. But, preceded by Arnold, who went forward for the purpose of procuring for them something which might satisfy the demands of nature, the troops persevered in their labours with a vigour unimpaired by the hardships they had encountered, until they once more found themselves in regions frequented by human beings.

On the high ground that separates the waters of the Kennebec from those of the St. Lawrence, the limited remaining supplies were divided among the groups; each was instructed, without trying to stay in touch with the others, to move as quickly as possible into populated areas. While those at the front were still thirty miles away from the first few scattered homes that made up that part of Canada, they finished their last bit of food. However, led by Arnold, who went ahead to find something to meet their basic needs, the troops continued their efforts with a determination unaffected by the hardships they had faced, until they reached areas once again inhabited by people.

After a march of such unexampled fatigue, no more time was allowed for repose than was barely sufficient to collect the rear, and to refresh the men. During this short respite from toil, the address signed by General Washington was published, and every assurance given to the people, that they came to protect, and not to plunder them. The line of march was resumed; and, on the 9th of November, this gallant corps reached Point Levi, opposite Quebec.

After an exhausting march, there was barely enough time for a brief rest to gather the rear and refresh the soldiers. During this short break from work, a statement signed by General Washington was released, assuring the people they were there to protect, not to plunder. The march continued, and on November 9th, this brave group reached Point Levi, across from Quebec.

He arrives before Quebec.

The town was almost entirely without a garrison, and nothing could exceed the astonishment of its inhabitants. Could Arnold have immediately crossed the St. Lawrence, and have availed himself of the first consternation, it is believed that he might have entered the place without opposition; but a high wind, and the want of boats, rendered the passage of the river impossible.

The town was almost completely unprotected, and the surprise of its residents was beyond words. If Arnold had crossed the St. Lawrence right away and taken advantage of the initial panic, it’s believed he could have entered the town without facing any resistance; however, strong winds and a lack of boats made crossing the river impossible.

One of his Indian messengers, despatched with letters to General Schuyler, had either betrayed him or been intercepted; and thus intelligence of his approach was communicated to Colonel M'Clean who was then at the mouth of the Sorel. Trembling for the capital of the province, that gallant veteran determined to throw himself into it, and endeavour to defend it. In the mean time, the winds continued so high for several nights as to render the passage of the river in the canoes which had been collected, too hazardous to be attempted; and it was only in the night that the Americans could hope to cross, because four ships of war were distributed at different stations in the river, and armed boats were employed to ply around them. Whilst the Americans were thus unavoidably detained on the south side of the St. Lawrence, Colonel M'Clean, with his corps of emigrants, entered the city.

One of his Indian messengers, sent with letters to General Schuyler, either betrayed him or was intercepted; as a result, Colonel M'Clean, who was at the mouth of the Sorel, was informed of his approach. Worried about the capital of the province, that brave veteran decided to rush in and try to defend it. Meanwhile, the winds remained strong for several nights, making it too dangerous to attempt crossing the river in the canoes that had been gathered; the Americans could only hope to cross at night because four warships were stationed at various points in the river, with armed boats patrolling around them. While the Americans were stuck on the south side of the St. Lawrence, Colonel M'Clean and his group of emigrants entered the city.

November 12.

At length the wind moderated; and Arnold determined to attempt the river. Eluding the armed vessels, and conquering a rapid current, he, with great difficulty and danger, crossed over in the night, and landed his little army about a mile and a half above the place which is rendered memorable by the disembarkation of Wolfe. The passage of the rugged cliffs which continue on the northern bank of the St. Lawrence for some distance above Quebec, being impracticable at this place, he marched down on the shore to Wolfe's Cove, and ascending with his band of hardy followers the same precipice which had opposed such obstacles to the British hero; he, too, formed his small corps on the heights near the plains of Abraham.

Eventually, the wind calmed down, and Arnold decided to try crossing the river. Avoiding the armed ships and battling against a strong current, he managed to safely cross over at night, landing his small army about a mile and a half above the spot made famous by Wolfe's landing. The rugged cliffs along the northern bank of the St. Lawrence were too steep to navigate at this location, so he marched along the shore to Wolfe's Cove. He climbed up the same steep cliff that had posed such challenges for the British hero; he too formed his small group on the heights near the Plains of Abraham.

The dangerous and difficult operations of crossing the river in canoes, whilst the passage was vigilantly guarded by ships of war, and of gaining the almost perpendicular heights of the opposite shore, were completed, soon after midnight, by the advance party, consisting of the rifle companies. While waiting for the residue of the detachment, a council of all the officers was held for the purpose of determining on their future measures. Although destitute of every implement required for an assault, Arnold proposed to march immediately against Quebec. He counted on surprising the place, and finding the gates open; but this opinion, which was not earnestly pressed, was overruled.

The risky and challenging tasks of crossing the river in canoes, while warships closely monitored the area, and reaching the steep heights of the opposite shore, were accomplished shortly after midnight by the advance party, made up of the rifle companies. While they waited for the rest of the team, all the officers gathered for a meeting to decide on their next steps. Even though they had no tools needed for an attack, Arnold suggested they move directly against Quebec. He hoped to catch the city off guard and find the gates open; however, this idea, which wasn’t strongly advocated, was dismissed.

Though disappointed in the expectation of surprising Quebec, Arnold did not immediately relinquish the hope of obtaining possession of that important place. Not superior to the garrison in point of numbers, and without a single piece of artillery, he was obviously incapable of acting offensively; but he flattered himself that a defection in the town might yet put it in his hands. With this view, he paraded on the adjacent heights for some days, and sent two flags to demand a surrender. But the presence of Colonel M'Clean restrained those measures which the fears of the inhabitants dictated. Deeming any communication with the assailants dangerous, he refused to receive the flag, and fired on the officer who bore it. Intelligence was soon obtained, that the first alarm was visibly wearing off, and giving place to other sentiments unfavourable to the hope of gaining Quebec. Fears for the vast property contained in the town had united the disaffected; who were, at their own request, embodied and armed. The sailors too were landed, and placed at the batteries; and, by these means, the garrison had become more numerous than the American army.

Though disappointed in his hope of surprising Quebec, Arnold did not immediately give up on the chance to take control of that important city. Not having a numerical advantage over the garrison and lacking any artillery, he clearly couldn't attack. However, he believed that if some people in the town switched sides, he might still seize it. With this in mind, he camped on the nearby heights for a few days and sent two flags demanding a surrender. But Colonel M'Clean's presence stopped any actions that the townspeople feared. Thinking that any communication with the attackers was risky, he refused to acknowledge the flag and fired on the officer carrying it. Soon, news spread that the initial panic was fading and being replaced by feelings that were not hopeful for taking Quebec. Concerns for the valuable properties in the town brought the dissatisfied people together; they requested to be organized and armed. The sailors were also brought ashore and positioned at the batteries; as a result, the garrison had become larger than the American army.

And retires to Point Aux Trembles.
November 19.

After collecting those who had been left on the south side of the St. Lawrence, Arnold could not parade more than seven hundred men, and they were in no condition to risk an action. In their laborious march through the wilderness, nearly one third of their muskets had been rendered useless; and their ammunition had sustained such damage that the riflemen had not more than ten, nor the other troops more than six rounds for each man. Under these circumstances, it was thought most adviseable to retire to Point Aux Trembles, twenty miles above Quebec, and there await the arrival of Montgomery. On their march, they saw the vessel which conveyed General Carleton; and afterwards found he had been on shore at Point Aux Trembles, a few hours before they reached that place.[21]

After gathering those who had been left on the south side of the St. Lawrence, Arnold could only line up about seven hundred men, and they were not in any shape to take on a fight. During their tough march through the wilderness, nearly a third of their muskets had become useless; and their ammunition was in such bad shape that the riflemen had only ten rounds each, while the other troops had no more than six. Given these conditions, it seemed best to withdraw to Point Aux Trembles, twenty miles upstream from Quebec, and wait for Montgomery to arrive. On their way, they spotted the ship that carried General Carleton; and later found out he had been on shore at Point Aux Trembles just a few hours before they got there.[21]

In war, the success of the most judicious plans often depends on accidents not to be foreseen nor controlled. Seldom has the truth of this proposition been more clearly demonstrated, than in the issue of the expedition conducted by Colonel Arnold. The situation of Canada conformed exactly to the expectations of the American general. Not suspecting that so bold and difficult an enterprise could be meditated, its Governor had left Quebec entirely defenceless, and had drawn the strength of the province towards the lakes. Could Arnold have reached that place a few days sooner—could he even have crossed the river on his first arrival at Point Levi—or had Colonel Enos been able to follow the main body with his division of the detachment—every probability favours the opinion, that this hardy and well conceived expedition would have been crowned with the most brilliant success. Nay, more—had Arnold been careful to relieve the inhabitants of the town from all fears respecting their property, there is reason to believe, they would have refused to defend it. But although this bold enterprise was planned with judgment, and executed with vigour; although the means employed were adequate to the object; yet the concurrence of several minute and unfavourable incidents entirely defeated it, and deprived it of that éclat to which it was justly entitled.

In war, the success of even the best plans often relies on unforeseen and uncontrollable accidents. Few situations have highlighted this truth more clearly than the outcome of Colonel Arnold's expedition. The situation in Canada matched the expectations of the American general perfectly. The Governor, not believing such a bold and challenging operation could be attempted, left Quebec completely vulnerable and repositioned the province's forces towards the lakes. If Arnold had reached that location a few days earlier—or even if he had crossed the river right after arriving at Point Levi—or if Colonel Enos had been able to keep up with the main group and his division of the detachment—it's highly likely that this brave and well-thought-out expedition would have achieved remarkable success. Moreover, if Arnold had assured the townspeople that their property would be protected, it's reasonable to believe they might have chosen not to defend it. But despite this ambitious plan being crafted thoughtfully and carried out with energy, and despite having sufficient resources to achieve its goal, a series of minor but unfavorable incidents completely undermined it and stripped it of the recognition it rightfully deserved.

December 5.

Having clothed his almost naked troops at Montreal, General Montgomery, at the head of about three hundred men, proceeded with his usual expedition to join Colonel Arnold at Point Aux Trembles, where he supplied the troops of that officer with clothes provided at Montreal; and afterwards marched with their united forces directly to Quebec. But, before his arrival, Governor Carleton, who had entered the town, was making every preparation for a vigorous defence. The garrison now consisted of about fifteen hundred men, of whom eight hundred were militia, and between four and five hundred were seamen. Montgomery's effective force was stated, by himself, at only eight hundred. His situation would have filled with despair a mind less vigorous, less sanguine, and less brave. His numbers were not sufficient to render success probable, according to any common principle of calculation; and the prospect of their being diminished might be rationally entertained. But, relying on their courage, on himself and his fortune, and on the fears of the garrison; stimulated, too, by the high expectations formed throughout America of his success, and by the dread of disappointing those expectations, he determined to lay immediate siege to the town.

Having outfitted his almost naked troops in Montreal, General Montgomery, leading about three hundred men, quickly moved to join Colonel Arnold at Point Aux Trembles, where he provided Arnold's troops with the clothing he had gathered in Montreal. Afterwards, they marched together straight to Quebec. However, before they arrived, Governor Carleton, who had entered the town, was preparing for a strong defense. The garrison now had around fifteen hundred men, with about eight hundred being militia and between four and five hundred being sailors. Montgomery estimated his effective force at only eight hundred. This situation would have driven a less determined, less hopeful, and less courageous person to despair. His numbers were not likely enough to make success probable by any standard calculation, and the possibility of his forces shrinking was a realistic concern. Yet, relying on their bravery, his own abilities and luck, and the fears of the garrison; motivated also by the high expectations across America for his success and the fear of letting those expectations down, he decided to immediately lay siege to the town.

Montgomery lays siege to Quebec.

In a few days he opened a six gun battery within seven hundred yards of the walls; but his artillery was too light to make a breach, and he did not calculate on any effect from it. His object was to amuse the garrison, and conceal his real design.

In a few days, he set up a six-gun battery just seven hundred yards from the walls; however, his artillery was too weak to create a breach, and he didn't expect it to have any impact. His goal was to entertain the garrison and hide his true intentions.

Although the troops supported the excessive hardships to which they were exposed, with constancy and firmness, Montgomery feared that such continued sufferings would overcome them; and, as he would soon have no legal authority to retain a part of them, he apprehended that he should be abandoned by that part. Impressed with the real necessity of taking decisive steps, and impelled by his native courage, this gallant officer determined to risk an assault.

Although the troops endured the harsh conditions they faced with resilience and strength, Montgomery worried that their ongoing suffering would break them. Since he would soon lose the legal authority to keep some of them, he feared that section would abandon him. Recognizing the urgent need to take decisive action and driven by his natural bravery, this courageous officer decided to risk launching an attack.

Of such materials was his little army composed, that the most desperate hardihood could not hope to succeed in the purposed attempt, unless it should receive the approbation of all his troops. It was therefore necessary, not only to consult the officers individually on this delicate subject, but to obtain also the cheerful assent of the soldiers to the meditated enterprise. The proposition was at first received coldly by a part of Arnold's corps, who were, by some means, disgusted with their commanding officer; but the influence of Morgan, who was particularly zealous for an assault, and who held up as a powerful inducement, the rights conferred by the usages of war on those who storm a fortified town, at length prevailed; and the measure was almost unanimously approved.

His little army was made up of such materials that even the most daring could not hope to succeed in the planned attempt unless they had the support of all his troops. Therefore, it was necessary not only to discuss this sensitive topic with the officers individually but also to get the enthusiastic agreement of the soldiers for the proposed mission. Initially, part of Arnold's corps reacted coldly to the idea, as they were somehow disillusioned with their commanding officer; however, the influence of Morgan, who was particularly eager for an attack and emphasized the rights given by the rules of war to those who storm a fortified town, eventually won out, and the plan was nearly unanimously approved.

Whilst the general was preparing for the assault, the garrison received intelligence of his design from a deserter. This circumstance induced him to change the plan, which had originally been to attack both the upper and lower towns at the same time. That finally adopted, was to divide the army into four parts; and while two of them, consisting of Canadians under Major Livingston, and a small party under Major Brown, were to distract the garrison by making two feints against the upper town at St. John's and Cape Diamond; the other two, led, the one by Montgomery in person, and the other by Arnold, were to make real attacks on opposite sides of the lower town. After gaining that, it would yet be extremely difficult to conquer the obstacles to be surmounted in forcing their way to the upper town; but, as all the wealth of the city would then be in their power, it was confidently expected that the inhabitants, to secure their property, would compel the governor to capitulate.

While the general was getting ready for the attack, the garrison learned of his plans from a deserter. This prompted him to change his strategy, which initially had been to assault both the upper and lower towns simultaneously. The new plan was to split the army into four sections; two of these, made up of Canadians under Major Livingston and a small group led by Major Brown, would create distractions by staging two feints against the upper town at St. John's and Cape Diamond. The other two groups, one led by Montgomery himself and the other by Arnold, would launch real attacks on opposite sides of the lower town. Even after securing the lower town, it would still be quite challenging to deal with the obstacles blocking access to the upper town; however, since all the wealth of the city would then be at their disposal, it was confidently anticipated that the residents, seeking to protect their possessions, would force the governor to surrender.

December 31.
Unsuccessful attack on that place.

Between four and five in the morning, the signal was given; and the several divisions moved to the assault under a violent storm of snow. The plan was so well concerted, that from the side of the river St. Lawrence, along the fortified front round to the basin, every part seemed equally threatened.[22] Montgomery advanced at the head of the New York troops, along the St. Lawrence, by the way of Aunce de Mere, under Cape Diamond. The first barrier on this side, at the Pot Ash, was defended by a battery, in which a few pieces of artillery were mounted; about two hundred paces in front of which was a block-house and picket. The guard placed at the block-house being chiefly Canadians, after giving a random and harmless fire, threw away their arms, and fled in confusion to the barrier. Their terrors were communicated to those who defended this important pass; and from the intelligence afterwards received by the American prisoners in Quebec, it appears that the battery was for a time deserted.

Between four and five in the morning, the signal was given, and the various divisions moved to attack amid a heavy snowstorm. The plan was so well organized that from the side of the St. Lawrence River, all the way around the fortified front to the basin, every area seemed equally threatened.[22] Montgomery led the New York troops along the St. Lawrence, via Aunce de Mere, under Cape Diamond. The first barrier on this side, at the Pot Ash, was protected by a battery with several pieces of artillery. About two hundred paces in front of it was a blockhouse and a picket. The guard stationed at the blockhouse, mostly Canadians, after firing a few random and ineffective shots, threw down their weapons and ran in panic to the barrier. Their fear spread to those defending this important pass, and from the information later obtained by the American prisoners in Quebec, it seems that the battery was temporarily abandoned.

Death of Montgomery.

Unfortunately, the difficulties of the route rendered it impossible for Montgomery to avail himself instantly of this first impression. Cape Diamond, around which he was to make his way, presents a precipice, the foot of which is washed by the river, where such enormous and rugged masses of ice had been piled on each other, as to render the way almost impassable.[23] Along the scanty path leading under the projecting rocks of the precipice, the Americans pressed forward in a narrow file, until they reached the block-house and picket. Montgomery, who was himself in front, assisted with his own hand to cut down or pull up the pickets, and open a passage for his troops: but the roughness and difficulty of the way had so lengthened his line of march, that he found it absolutely necessary to halt a few minutes. Having re-assembled about two hundred men, he advanced boldly and rapidly at their head, to force the barrier. One or two persons had now ventured to return to the battery, and seizing a slow-match, discharged a gun, when the American front was within forty paces of it. This single and accidental fire proved fatal to the enterprise. The general, with Captains M'Pherson and Cheeseman, the first of whom was his aid, together with his orderly sergeant and a private, were killed upon the spot. The loss of their general, in whom their confidence had been so justly placed, discouraged the troops; and Colonel Campbell, on whom the command devolved, made no attempt to reanimate them. This whole division retired precipitately from the action, and left the garrison at leisure to direct its undivided force against Arnold.

Unfortunately, the challenges of the route made it impossible for Montgomery to act immediately on this first impression. Cape Diamond, which he needed to navigate, has a steep cliff at its base, where huge, rough chunks of ice were stacked on top of each other, making the path nearly impassable.[23] Along the narrow path that led beneath the overhanging rocks of the cliff, the Americans moved in single file until they reached the block-house and picket. Montgomery, leading the way, helped cut down or pull up the pickets to create a passage for his troops. However, the roughness and difficulty of the route had significantly slowed his march, so he found it necessary to stop for a few minutes. After regrouping about two hundred men, he advanced boldly and quickly at their head to break through the barrier. One or two people had started to return to the battery, and grabbing a slow-match, fired a gun when the American front was just forty paces away. This single, accidental shot proved disastrous for the mission. The general, along with Captains M'Pherson and Cheeseman—M'Pherson being his aide—along with his orderly sergeant and a private, were killed on the spot. The loss of their general, in whom they had placed so much trust, disheartened the troops; and Colonel Campbell, who took over command, made no effort to motivate them. The entire division retreated quickly from the battle, leaving the garrison free to focus its full force against Arnold.

At the common signal for the attack, the division commanded by this officer moved in files along the street of St. Roques towards the Saut de Matelots, where the first barrier had been constructed, and a battery of two twelve pounders erected. In imitation of Montgomery, he too led the forlorn hope in person, and was followed by Captain Lamb with his company of artillery, and a field piece mounted on a sled. Close in the rear of the artillery was the main body, in front of which was Morgan's company of riflemen, commanded by himself. The path along which the troops were to march was so narrow, that the two pieces of artillery in the battery were capable of raking with grape shot every inch of the ground; whilst the whole right flank was exposed to an incessant fire of musketry from the walls, and from the pickets of the garrison.

At the common signal for the attack, the division led by this officer moved in rows along the street of St. Roques toward the Saut de Matelots, where the first barrier had been set up, and a battery of two twelve-pounders was positioned. Following the example of Montgomery, he personally led the risky charge, trailed by Captain Lamb and his artillery company, along with a field piece on a sled. Right behind the artillery was the main body, with Morgan’s company of riflemen in front, led by him. The path the troops had to march was so narrow that the two artillery pieces could hit every inch of the ground with grape shot; meanwhile, the entire right flank was under continuous fire from the walls and the garrison’s pickets.

In this order Arnold advanced along the St. Charles with the utmost intrepidity. The alarm was immediately given, and the fire on his flank commenced. As he approached the barrier, he received a musket ball in the leg which shattered the bone, and was carried off the field. Morgan rushed forward to the battery at the head of his company, and received from one of the pieces, almost at its mouth, a discharge of grape shot, which killed only one man. The barricade was instantly mounted, on which the battery was deserted without a discharge from another gun. The captain of the guard, with the greater number of his men, were made prisoners.

In this order, Arnold marched along the St. Charles with complete bravery. The alarm was quickly raised, and gunfire erupted on his side. As he got closer to the barrier, he was hit in the leg by a musket ball that shattered the bone, and he was carried off the battlefield. Morgan charged forward to the battery at the front of his company and was hit by a close-range discharge of grapeshot, which only killed one man. The barricade was quickly taken, resulting in the battery being abandoned without firing another shot. The captain of the guard and most of his men were captured.

Morgan formed his troops in the streets within the barrier, and took into custody several English and Canadian burghers; but his situation soon became extremely critical. He was not followed by the main body of the division—he had no guide—and was, himself, totally ignorant of the situation of the town. It was yet dark—and he had not the slightest knowledge of the course to be pursued, or of the defences to be encountered. Under these circumstances, it was thought unadviseable to advance farther. They were soon joined by Lieutenant Colonel Green, and Majors Bigelow and Meigs, with several fragments of companies, so as to constitute altogether about two hundred men.

Morgan lined up his troops in the streets within the barrier and took several English and Canadian citizens into custody. However, his situation quickly became very critical. He was not followed by the main group of his division—he had no guide—and he had no idea about the town's layout. It was still dark, and he was completely unaware of which path to take or what defenses they might encounter. Given these circumstances, it was considered unwise to move forward. They were soon joined by Lieutenant Colonel Green, along with Majors Bigelow and Meigs, and several small groups of soldiers, totaling about two hundred men.

As the light of day began to appear, this gallant party was again formed, with Morgan's company in front; and, with one voice, loudly called on him to lead them against the second barrier, which was now known to be less than forty paces from them, though concealed by an angle of the street from their immediate view. Seizing the few ladders brought with them, they again rushed forward; and under an incessant fire from the battery, and from the windows overlooking it, applied their ladders to the barricade; and maintained for some time a fierce, and, on their part, a bloody contest. Exposed thus, in a narrow street, to a galling fire, and finding themselves unable to force the barrier, or to discharge more than one in ten of their fire arms—the violence of the storm having unfitted them for service; many of the assailants threw themselves into the stone houses on each side, which afforded them a shelter both from the storm and from the enemy. After continuing some time in this situation, Morgan proposed to cut their way back to the American camp. They were prevented from adopting this daring resolution, only by the suggestion that the attack led by Montgomery, of whose fate they were ignorant, might possibly be successful; and that, in the event of his having entered the opposite part of the town, their co-operation might be useful to him. On this account, they determined still to maintain their situation. But the force of the enemy increasing considerably, they soon perceived that they were no longer masters of their own destinies, and surrendered themselves prisoners of war.[24]

As the daylight began to break, this brave group formed again, with Morgan's company in front. In unison, they loudly called for him to lead them against the second barrier, which they now knew was less than forty paces away, though hidden from their immediate view by a bend in the street. They grabbed the few ladders they had brought and rushed forward. Under constant fire from the battery and the windows above, they set their ladders against the barricade and engaged in a fierce and bloody battle for some time. Exposed in a narrow street to relentless gunfire, and realizing they couldn't break through the barrier or effectively use more than one in ten of their firearms—the storm had rendered them less effective—many of the attackers dove into the stone houses on either side, seeking shelter from both the storm and the enemy. After staying in this position for a while, Morgan suggested they cut their way back to the American camp. They were only held back from this bold plan by the thought that the attack led by Montgomery, of whom they were unaware of his fate, might succeed; and that if he had entered the other part of town, their help could be valuable to him. For this reason, they decided to maintain their position. However, as the enemy's forces grew significantly, they soon realized they were no longer in control of their fate and surrendered as prisoners of war.[24]

In this bold attack on Quebec, the loss on the part of the garrison was inconsiderable. That of the Americans was about four hundred men, three hundred and forty of whom were prisoners. It fell chiefly on Arnold's division. Captain Hendricks of the Pennsylvania riflemen, Lieutenant Humphries of Morgan's company, and Lieutenant Cooper of Connecticut, were among the slain. Captains Lamb and Hubbard, and Lieutenants Steele and Tisdale, were among the wounded. Every officer at the second barrier received several balls through his clothes, and some of them were severely scorched by the powder from the muzzles of the muskets discharged at them. But the loss most deplored, and most fatal to the hopes of the American army, was that of their general.

In this bold attack on Quebec, the garrison's losses were minimal. The Americans lost about four hundred men, with three hundred and forty taken prisoner. The majority of the casualties were from Arnold's division. Captain Hendricks of the Pennsylvania riflemen, Lieutenant Humphries of Morgan's company, and Lieutenant Cooper of Connecticut were among the killed. Captains Lamb and Hubbard, along with Lieutenants Steele and Tisdale, were among the wounded. Every officer at the second barrier took several hits through their clothing, and some were badly burned by the gunpowder from the muskets fired at them. However, the loss that was most mourned and had the greatest impact on the American army's hopes was that of their general.

Richard Montgomery was a native of Ireland, and had served with reputation in the late war. After its conclusion he settled in New York, where he married an American lady, and took a decided part with the colonies in their contest with Great Britain. His military reputation was high throughout America. In the history of his achievements, while commanding in Canada, we perceive the bold, skilful, and active partisan; and, so far as a judgment can be formed of a capacity for conducting the movements of a large army from judicious management of a small one, we can not hesitate to allow him the talents of an able general. At the head of a small body of undisciplined troops, drawn from different colonies, unwilling to be commanded by a stranger, jealous of him in the extreme, often disposed to disobedience, and anxious for their homes, he conquered difficulties which not many would have ventured to meet; and, until his last fatal moment, was uniformly successful. In little more than two months, he made himself master of Canada, from the lakes to Quebec: and, as if determined to triumph over the climate itself, laid siege, in the depth of winter, to that important fortress. His measures seem to have been taken with judgment, and were certainly executed with great courage and unremitting exertion. When he appears to have risked much, and to have exposed his troops to excessive hardships, this line of conduct was not inconsiderately chosen. The state of his affairs left him only the alternative between attempting to storm Quebec, or abandoning the great object of the expedition. Nor was his attempt so hopeless a measure as the strength of the place, and the event might, at first view, induce us to suppose. The design was worthy of the lofty spirit which formed it; though hazardous, it was not desperate; and if great courage was required to crown it with success, great courage was employed in its execution. He counted, and with reason, on the fears of the garrison, and on the immense extent of ground to be guarded. Had he not fallen himself, or been deserted by his troops, it is even yet believed the enterprise would have succeeded. The progress made by Arnold's division gives great countenance to this opinion.

Richard Montgomery was from Ireland and had gained a strong reputation during the recent war. After the war ended, he settled in New York, married an American woman, and threw his support behind the colonies in their fight against Great Britain. He was highly regarded for his military skills across America. His achievements while leading in Canada showcase him as a bold, skilled, and active leader; based on how effectively he managed a small group, we can confidently say he had the makings of a capable general. He led a small group of undisciplined soldiers from different colonies who were reluctant to follow a stranger, very much on edge, often disobedient, and eager to return home. He faced challenges that few would have dared to confront, and he was consistently successful until his final tragic moment. In just over two months, he took control of Canada, from the lakes to Quebec, and even dared to lay siege to that crucial fortress in the harsh depths of winter. His strategies seemed well thought out and were executed with remarkable bravery and relentless effort. When he seemed to take significant risks and expose his troops to extreme hardships, these decisions were not made lightly. His situation left him with only two options: to try to storm Quebec or give up on the main goal of the expedition. His attempt wasn’t as hopeless as the strength of the fort and the outcome might initially suggest. The plan was fitting for the ambitious spirit behind it; while risky, it wasn’t hopeless, and significant courage was necessary to achieve success—courage that was evident in its execution. He logically relied on the fears of the garrison and the vast area that needed to be secured. Had he not fallen or been abandoned by his troops, many still believe the mission would have succeeded. The progress made by Arnold's division supports this belief.

To manifest the high sense entertained of his services, congress directed a monument, expressing the circumstances of his death and the gratitude of his country, to be erected to his memory.

To honor the high regard for his services, Congress ordered a monument to be built in his memory, detailing the circumstances of his death and the gratitude of his country.

The Americans, being no longer in a condition to continue the siege, retired about three miles from the city; where, though inferior in numbers to the garrison, they maintained the blockade. By preserving this bold countenance, they retained the confidence of the Canadians; which saved their affairs, for a time, from total ruin.

The Americans, no longer able to keep up the siege, pulled back about three miles from the city. There, despite being outnumbered by the garrison, they continued to block the area. By keeping up this brave front, they maintained the Canadians' confidence, which temporarily saved their situation from complete disaster.

Governor Carleton was content to preserve Quebec, until the reinforcements he expected in the spring should enable him to act on the offensive. He therefore determined not to hazard an attack, with a garrison on which it was unsafe to rely; and Arnold, on whom the command had devolved, remained undisturbed. Although badly wounded, he retained his courage and activity; and, though deserted by those whose terms of service had expired, so as to be reduced at one time to about five hundred effective men, he discovered no disposition to sink under the weight of adverse fortune.

Governor Carleton was satisfied to hold onto Quebec until the reinforcements he was expecting in the spring would allow him to go on the offensive. He decided not to risk an attack, knowing his garrison wasn't reliable. As a result, Arnold, who had taken over command, stayed calm. Even though he was seriously injured, he stayed brave and active; and despite being abandoned by some of his men whose service had ended, leaving him with only about five hundred effective troops, he showed no signs of giving up under the pressure of bad luck.

While the affairs of the colonies wore this gloomy aspect in Canada, congress was indulging sanguine hopes of annexing that province to the union. Nine regiments, including one to be raised in that colony, were voted for its defence during the ensuing campaign; and General Schuyler was directed to construct a number of batteaux at Ticonderoga, for the purpose of transporting the troops to the scene of action.

While things were looking grim in the Canadian colonies, Congress was holding onto optimistic hopes of adding that province to the union. They voted for nine regiments, including one to be raised in that colony, for its defense during the upcoming campaign; and General Schuyler was instructed to build several batteaux at Ticonderoga to transport the troops to the battlefield.

1776

Whilst adopting these measures, congress received the melancholy intelligence of the disaster of the 31st December. Far from being dispirited by this reverse of fortune, that body redoubled its exertions to hasten reinforcements to the army in Canada, and urged the several conventions to collect for its use all the specie they could obtain. January 17.These measures were, in some degree, accelerated by having been anticipated by the Commander-in-chief.[25]

While implementing these measures, Congress received the sad news of the disaster on December 31. Instead of being discouraged by this setback, they intensified their efforts to send reinforcements to the army in Canada and urged various conventions to gather as much money as they could. January 17 These actions were somewhat expedited as they had been anticipated by the Commander-in-chief.[25]

The service in Canada being deemed of too much importance to be entrusted to Colonel, now Brigadier General Arnold, or to General Wooster; and the health of General Schuyler not admitting of his proceeding to Quebec; General Thomas, an officer who had acquired reputation at Roxbury, was ordered to take command of the army in that province.

The service in Canada was considered too important to be assigned to Colonel, now Brigadier General Arnold, or to General Wooster; since General Schuyler's health didn't allow him to go to Quebec, General Thomas, an officer who had gained recognition at Roxbury, was ordered to take command of the army in that province.

In the hope of exciting throughout Canada the sentiments which prevailed in the United Colonies, and of forming with it a perfect union, three commissioners, Mr. Franklin, Mr. Chase, and Mr. Carroll,[26] were deputed with full powers on this subject, and with instructions to establish a free press. These commissioners were directed to assure the people that they would be permitted to adopt such form of government as should be agreeable to themselves; to exercise freely all the rights of conscience; and to be considered as a sister colony, governed by the same general system of mild and equal laws which prevailed in the other colonies, with only such local differences as each might deem conducive to its own happiness. They were also instructed to inquire into the conduct of the American army, and to correct any irregularities which might be offensive to the people.

In the hope of inspiring similar feelings across Canada as those in the United Colonies and creating a strong union, three commissioners, Mr. Franklin, Mr. Chase, and Mr. Carroll,[26] were appointed with full authority on this matter and given instructions to establish a free press. These commissioners were tasked with reassuring the people that they could choose a form of government that suited them; to freely exercise all their rights of conscience; and to be regarded as a sister colony, governed by the same general system of fair and equal laws that applied to the other colonies, with only the local differences that each felt would enhance their happiness. They were also directed to investigate the behavior of the American army and to address any issues that might be upsetting to the people.

Congress seems to have entertained the opinion expressed by General Washington in a letter to General Schuyler, "that the Province could be secured only by laying hold of the affections of the people, and engaging them heartily in the common cause." In pursuance of this opinion, they adopted the magnanimous policy of compensating those individuals who had suffered for their adherence to the Americans.

Congress appears to have embraced the view shared by General Washington in a letter to General Schuyler, "that the Province could only be secured by winning the support of the people and getting them fully engaged in the common cause." Following this belief, they adopted the generous policy of compensating those individuals who had suffered for their loyalty to the Americans.

Blockade of Quebec continued.

In the mean time Arnold maintained the blockade of Quebec. But reinforcements were slow in arriving, notwithstanding every exertion to hasten them, and from the first of January to the first of March, the effective force before that place had never exceeded seven hundred men, and had often been as low as five hundred. In March, reinforcements arrived in greater numbers, and the army was increased to seventeen hundred; but this number was soon reduced by the small-pox, which had made its way into camp, where, in contempt of orders, it was propagated by inoculation.

In the meantime, Arnold kept the blockade of Quebec going. However, reinforcements were coming in slowly, despite efforts to speed them up, and from January 1 to March 1, the effective force at that location never exceeded seven hundred men, and often dropped as low as five hundred. In March, more reinforcements arrived, raising the army to seventeen hundred; but this number quickly fell due to smallpox, which had spread to the camp and was distributed through inoculation, defying orders.

To render the blockade in any degree effectual, this small army, which occupied the island of Orleans and both sides of the St. Lawrence, was spread over a circuit of twenty-six miles, and divided by three ferries. The establishment of discipline had been impracticable, if attempted; and the Canadians were often injured and irritated. There is reason to believe that even General Arnold was disposed to think himself in the country of an enemy; and that, in repressing disorders, he did not exert that energy which he had always displayed conspicuously in the field.

To make the blockade somewhat effective, this small army, which occupied the island of Orleans and both sides of the St. Lawrence, was stretched over a twenty-six-mile area and separated by three ferries. It would have been impossible to establish discipline even if they had tried, and the Canadians were often harmed and frustrated. There’s reason to believe that even General Arnold felt like he was in enemy territory, and that he didn’t show the same energy in keeping things in order as he had always demonstrated on the battlefield.

March 4.

Many causes combined to diminish the attachment originally manifested by the Canadians to the United Colonies. The necessities of his situation compelled General Arnold to issue a proclamation making paper money current, under the promise of redeeming it in four months, and denouncing those as enemies, who should refuse to receive it. The Canadians were unwilling to exchange their property or labour, for an article of such uncertain value; and the discontents excited by the attempt to force it on them were very considerable.

Many factors came together to reduce the affection that Canadians initially felt for the United Colonies. The circumstances forced General Arnold to issue a proclamation making paper money valid, promising to redeem it in four months, and labeling anyone who refused to accept it as an enemy. The Canadians were hesitant to trade their goods or labor for something of such questionable value, and the frustration caused by the attempt to impose this on them was quite significant.

Another circumstance, which had great influence with reflecting men, was the obvious incompetence of the American force to its object. The Canadians had expected a powerful army—sufficient for the protection of the country; and their disappointment in this respect, produced a great change in their opinions and conduct.

Another factor that deeply affected thoughtful individuals was the clear inability of the American forces to achieve their goals. The Canadians had anticipated a strong army—one adequate to protect their country; their disappointment in this regard led to a significant shift in their views and actions.

The dissatisfaction arising from these causes was augmented by the priests. They, as a body, were never cordial in the American interest; and having been, since the death of Montgomery, very injudiciously neglected, had become almost universally hostile to the views of the United Colonies.

The dissatisfaction from these causes was worsened by the priests. As a group, they were never supportive of American interests; and since the death of Montgomery, they had been very poorly neglected and had become almost universally opposed to the goals of the United Colonies.

General Carleton was no stranger to the revolution which was taking place in the minds of the Canadians, and entertained the hope of raising the siege by their assistance. A detachment of about sixty men, from the garrison of Quebec, landed twelve leagues below the town on the south side of the river, and were joined by about two hundred and fifty Canadians, who were rapidly increasing in numbers, when they were suddenly attacked by a detachment sent by Arnold, which surprised their advance guard, killed a few, took some prisoners, and dispersed the residue.

General Carleton was well aware of the revolution happening in the minds of the Canadians and hoped to lift the siege with their help. A group of around sixty men from the Quebec garrison landed twelve leagues downriver on the south side and were joined by about two hundred fifty Canadians, who were quickly growing in number, when they were unexpectedly attacked by a group sent by Arnold. This caught their advance guard off guard, killed a few, took some prisoners, and scattered the rest.

April 2.

As the season of the year approached when reinforcements from England might be expected, Arnold deemed it necessary to recommence active operations, and to resume the siege. His batteries were again erected, and were opened on the 2d of April, but without much effect. He had not weight of metal to make a breach in the wall, nor an engineer capable of directing a siege, nor artillerists who understood the management of the pieces.

As the time of year came when reinforcements from England were expected, Arnold felt it was important to start active operations again and resume the siege. His batteries were set up again and opened fire on April 2nd, but it didn’t have much impact. He didn’t have enough firepower to break the wall, nor an engineer who could lead a siege, nor gunners who knew how to operate the artillery.

On the 1st of April, Wooster had arrived, and, on the succeeding day, Arnold's horse fell with him, and so bruised one of his legs as to confine him to his bed for some time. Believing himself to be neglected, he obtained leave of absence as soon as he was able to move, and took the command at Montreal.

On April 1st, Wooster arrived, and the next day, Arnold's horse threw him off and injured one of his legs badly enough to keep him in bed for a while. Feeling neglected, he took a leave of absence as soon as he could move and took command in Montreal.

April 15.

A considerable part of the army having become entitled to a discharge, no inducement could prevail on them to continue longer in so severe a service. This deduction from Wooster's force was the more sensibly felt, because the present situation of the roads, the lakes, and the St. Lawrence, suspended the arrival of the reinforcements destined for his aid.

A significant number of soldiers had qualified for a discharge, and no incentive could convince them to stay in such harsh conditions any longer. This reduction in Wooster's forces was felt even more acutely because the current state of the roads, the lakes, and the St. Lawrence had delayed the arrival of the reinforcements meant to support him.

General Thomas takes command of the army.

Among the first who reached camp after this state of things took place, was General Thomas. He arrived on the 1st of May, and found an army consisting of nineteen hundred men; of whom, less than one thousand, including officers, were effective. Among these were three hundred entitled to discharge, who refused to do duty, and insisted importunately on being immediately dismissed. This small force was still more enfeebled by being so divided that it was impracticable to unite more than three hundred men at any one point. All the magazines contained but one hundred and fifty barrels of powder, and six days provisions; nor could adequate supplies from the country people be obtained, as the Canadians no longer manifested any disposition to serve them.

Among the first to reach camp after this situation developed was General Thomas. He arrived on May 1st and found an army of nineteen hundred men; however, fewer than one thousand, including officers, were fit for duty. Among these were three hundred who were eligible for discharge, refusing to serve and insisting strongly that they be dismissed immediately. This small force was further weakened by being so scattered that it was impossible to assemble more than three hundred men at any one point. All the supplies included just one hundred and fifty barrels of powder and six days’ worth of provisions; nor could sufficient supplies be obtained from the locals, as the Canadians no longer showed any willingness to assist them.

The river began to open below, and it was certain, that the British would seize the first moment of its being practicable, to relieve this important place. Amidst these unpromising circumstances, the hopes of taking Quebec appeared to General Thomas to be chimerical, and a longer continuance before the town both useless and dangerous. It was apparent that the first reinforcements which should arrive would deprive him entirely of the use of the river, and consequently would embarrass the removal of his sick, and military stores. No object remained to justify this hazard.

The river started to widen below, and it was clear that the British would jump at the first chance to make use of it to support this crucial location. In the midst of these bleak circumstances, General Thomas felt that the chances of capturing Quebec seemed unrealistic, and staying outside the town any longer was both pointless and risky. It was obvious that any reinforcements arriving first would completely cut off his access to the river, which would complicate the evacuation of his sick troops and military supplies. There was no longer any reason to take this risk.

The blockade of Quebec is raised.
May 6.

Under these impressions, he called a council of war, which unanimously determined, that the army was not in a condition to risk an assault—that the sick should be removed to the Three Rivers, and the artillery and other stores embarked in their boats, in order to move to a more defensible position. On the evening of the same day, intelligence was received that a British fleet was below; and, the next morning, five ships, which had, with much labour and danger, made their way up the river through the ice, appeared in sight. They soon entered the harbour, and landed some men whilst the Americans were assiduously employed in the embarkation of their sick and stores—an operation carried on the more slowly, because the first appearance of the ships deprived them of the aid expected from the teams and carriages of the Canadians.

Under these circumstances, he called a military council, which unanimously decided that the army wasn’t in a position to risk an assault—that the sick should be moved to the Three Rivers, and that the artillery and other supplies should be loaded onto their boats to relocate to a more defensible spot. That evening, word came that a British fleet was nearby; the next morning, five ships—having made their way up the river through the ice with a lot of effort and danger—came into view. They quickly entered the harbor and landed some troops while the Americans were diligently working to evacuate their sick and supplies. This task was taking longer because the sight of the ships meant they couldn’t rely on the help they were expecting from the Canadians' teams and wagons.

About noon, Carleton made a sortie at the head of one thousand men, formed in two divisions, and supported by six field pieces. The Americans had thrown up no intrenchments, and could not bring into action more than three hundred men. Under these circumstances, victory was scarcely possible, and could have produced no important effect. General Thomas, therefore, with the advice of the field officers about him, determined not to risk an action, and ordered his troops to retreat up the river. This was done with much precipitation, and many of the sick, with all the military stores, fell into the hands of the enemy. The army continued its retreat to the Sorel, where General Thomas was seized with the small=pox, of which he died.[27]

At about noon, Carleton led a charge with a thousand men, organized into two divisions and backed by six field cannons. The Americans hadn't set up any fortifications and could only muster around three hundred men. Given these circumstances, winning was very unlikely and wouldn't have made much difference. So, General Thomas, with input from the field officers around him, decided not to risk a battle and ordered his troops to fall back up the river. This was done hastily, and many sick soldiers, along with all the military supplies, were captured by the enemy. The army continued its retreat to the Sorel, where General Thomas contracted smallpox and passed away.[27]

The Americans were much dissatisfied with the conduct of this gentleman. To him they, in some degree, attributed the disasters which ruined their affairs in Canada. But this censure was unjust. He took command of the army when it was too weak to maintain its ground, and when the time for saving the sick and the military stores had passed away.

The Americans were very unhappy with this gentleman's actions. They somewhat blamed him for the failures that ruined their efforts in Canada. However, this criticism was unfair. He took command of the army when it was too weak to hold its position, and when it was too late to save the sick and the military supplies.

The siege of Quebec, instead of being continued longer, ought to have been abandoned at an earlier period. This was the real fault of those who commanded in Canada. It is to be ascribed to the reluctance always felt by inexperienced officers to disappoint the public expectation, by relinquishing an enterprise concerning which sanguine hopes have been entertained; and to encounter the obloquy of giving up a post, although it can no longer with prudence be defended. In the perseverance with which the siege of Quebec was maintained, these motives operated with all their force, and they received an addition, from the unwillingness felt by the Americans, to abandon those of their friends who had taken so decisive a part in their favour, as to be incapable of remaining in safety behind them.

The siege of Quebec should have been called off sooner instead of being dragged out. This was the real mistake of those in command in Canada. It stemmed from the hesitation of inexperienced officers to let down public expectations by giving up on an effort that had once inspired so much hope; they faced backlash for abandoning a position even when it could no longer be defended wisely. The stubbornness to continue the siege of Quebec was driven by these strong feelings, and it was compounded by the Americans' reluctance to leave behind their friends who had played such a crucial role in supporting them and could not safely stay behind.

June 4.
General Sullivan takes the command.

After the death of General Thomas, reinforcements assembled at the mouth of the Sorel, which increased the army to four or five thousand men, who were commanded by General Sullivan. The friendly Canadians who had supposed themselves abandoned, manifested great joy at the arrival of a force which appeared to them very considerable; and offered every assistance in their power. Sullivan calculated on their joining him in great numbers, and entertained sanguine hopes of recovering and maintaining the post of De Chambeau. As a previous measure, it was necessary to dislodge the enemy at the Three Rivers.

After General Thomas died, reinforcements gathered at the mouth of the Sorel, boosting the army to four or five thousand men under General Sullivan’s command. The friendly Canadians, who thought they’d been left behind, were very happy to see a force that seemed quite significant to them and offered all the help they could. Sullivan expected many of them to join him and was hopeful about recovering and holding the post at De Chambeau. Before that could happen, though, they needed to drive the enemy out of the Three Rivers.

Carleton was not immediately in a situation to follow up the blow given the Americans at Quebec, and to drive them entirely out of the province; but the respite allowed them was not of long duration.

Carleton wasn't in a position to pursue the attack on the Americans at Quebec right away and completely drive them out of the province, but the break they were given didn't last long.

Towards the end of May large reinforcements arrived, which augmented the British army in Canada to about thirteen thousand men. The general rendezvous appointed for these troops was at the Three Rivers. The army was greatly divided. A considerable corps, commanded by General Frazer, had reached the Three Rivers, and the main body was on its way from Quebec. The distance from the Sorel was about fifty miles, and several armed vessels and transports, full of troops, lay about five miles higher up than the Three Rivers, full in the way.[28]

Towards the end of May, large reinforcements arrived, bringing the British army in Canada to about thirteen thousand soldiers. The designated meeting point for these troops was at the Three Rivers. The army was quite dispersed. A significant contingent, led by General Frazer, had reached the Three Rivers, while the main force was on its way from Quebec. The distance from Sorel was about fifty miles, and several armed vessels and transports, filled with troops, were anchored about five miles upstream from the Three Rivers, blocking the way.[28]

General Thompson, who commanded the army after the illness of General Thomas, understanding the party at the Three Rivers to consist of about eight hundred men, partly Canadians, had detached Colonel St. Clair with between six and seven hundred men, to attack it, if there should be any probability of doing so with advantage. Colonel St. Clair advanced to Nicolet, where, believing himself not strong enough for the service on which he had been ordered, he waited for further reinforcements, or additional instructions. At this time General Sullivan arrived; and, understanding the enemy to be weak at the Three Rivers, orders General Thompson to join Colonel St. Clair at Nicolet, with a reinforcement of nearly fourteen hundred men, to take command of the whole detachment, and to attack the troops lying at the Three Rivers, provided there was a favourable prospect of success.

General Thompson, who took charge of the army after General Thomas fell ill, learned that the group at the Three Rivers consisted of about eight hundred men, some of whom were Canadians. He sent Colonel St. Clair with around six to seven hundred men to launch an attack if it seemed likely to succeed. Colonel St. Clair moved to Nicolet, but feeling he didn’t have enough strength for the mission he was assigned, he paused to wait for more reinforcements or new instructions. At that point, General Sullivan arrived and, realizing the enemy was weak at the Three Rivers, instructed General Thompson to head to Nicolet with almost fourteen hundred men to take command of the entire detachment and to attack the forces at the Three Rivers, provided there was a good chance of winning.

June 8.

General Thompson joined Colonel St. Clair at Nicolet, and, believing himself strong enough to perform the service consigned to him, fell down the river by night, and passed to the other side, with the intention of surprising Frazer. The plan was to attack the village a little before day-break, at the same instant, at each end; whilst two smaller corps were drawn up to cover and support the attack.

General Thompson met up with Colonel St. Clair at Nicolet and, thinking he had enough strength to carry out the assigned task, made his way down the river at night, crossing to the other side with the goal of surprising Frazer. The plan was to launch an attack on the village just before dawn, hitting both ends at the same time, while two smaller units were set up to provide cover and support for the attack.

Battle of the Three Rivers.

The troops passed the armed vessels without being perceived, but arrived at Three Rivers about an hour later than had been intended; in consequence of which they were discovered, and the alarm was given at their landing. To avoid the fire of some ships in the river, they attempted to pass through what appeared to be a point of woods, but was in reality a deep morass three miles in extent. The delays occasioned by their detention in this morass, gave General Frazer full time to land some field pieces, and prepare for their reception; while General Nesbit fell into their rear, and cut off their return to the boats. They advanced to the charge, but were soon repulsed; and finding it impracticable to return the way they came, were driven some miles through a deep swamp, which they traversed with inconceivable toil, and every degree of distress. The British at length gave over the pursuit.

The troops passed the armed ships without being noticed but arrived at Three Rivers about an hour later than planned. As a result, they were spotted, and the alarm was raised when they landed. To avoid the fire from some ships in the river, they tried to go through what looked like an area of woods, but it was actually a deep swamp spanning three miles. The delays caused by getting stuck in this swamp allowed General Frazer enough time to unload some artillery and set up for their arrival, while General Nesbit circled around to cut off their way back to the boats. They charged forward, but were quickly pushed back. Realizing that returning the way they came was impossible, they were pushed several miles through a deep swamp, enduring unimaginable effort and distress. Eventually, the British gave up the chase.

In this unfortunate enterprise, General Thompson and Colonel Irwin, with about two hundred men, were made prisoners; and from twenty to thirty were killed. The loss of the British was inconsiderable.

In this unfortunate mission, General Thompson and Colonel Irwin, along with around two hundred men, were taken prisoner; and twenty to thirty were killed. The British losses were minimal.

June 14.

The whole American force in Canada now amounted to about eight thousand men, not one half of whom were fit for duty. About two thousand five hundred effectives were with General Sullivan at the Sorel. The whole were in a state of total insubordination—much harassed with fatigue—and dispirited by their late losses, by the visible superiority of the enemy, and by the apprehension that their retreat would be entirely cut off. Under all these discouraging circumstances, General Sullivan formed the rash determination of defending the post at Sorel; and was induced only by the unanimous opinion of his officers, and a conviction that the troops would not support him, to abandon it a few hours before the British took possession of it. The same causes drew him reluctantly from Chamblée and St. John's; but he resolved to remain at the Isle Aux Noix, until he should receive orders to retreat. He had been joined at St. John's by General Arnold, who had crossed over at Longueisle just in time to save the garrison of Montreal.

The entire American force in Canada now totaled about eight thousand men, of whom less than half were fit for duty. About two thousand five hundred effective troops were with General Sullivan at the Sorel. Overall, they were in a state of complete insubordination, heavily burdened by fatigue, and demoralized by their recent losses, the obvious superiority of the enemy, and the fear that their retreat would be completely cut off. Given these discouraging circumstances, General Sullivan made the hasty decision to defend the position at Sorel; he was only convinced to abandon it a few hours before the British took control, based on the unanimous opinion of his officers and the belief that the troops wouldn't support him. The same reasons reluctantly led him away from Chamblée and St. John's; however, he decided to stay at Isle Aux Noix until he received orders to retreat. He had been joined at St. John's by General Arnold, who crossed over at Longueisle just in time to save the garrison of Montreal.

The Isle Aux Noix is a low unhealthy place, badly supplied with water; where the troops were so universally seized with fevers, as to compel General Sullivan to retire to the Isle Lamotte. At that place he received the orders of General Schuyler to embark on the lakes for Crown Point.

The Isle Aux Noix is a low, unhealthy area with poor water supply; the troops were so widely affected by fevers that General Sullivan had to retreat to Isle Lamotte. There, he got orders from General Schuyler to head out on the lakes to Crown Point.

The armed vessels on the Sorel and St. Lawrence were destroyed, and the fortifications of Chamblée and St. John's set on fire. All the baggage of the army, and nearly all the military stores were saved.

The armed ships on the Sorel and St. Lawrence were destroyed, and the fortifications at Chamblée and St. John's were set on fire. All the army's baggage and almost all the military supplies were saved.

The British army, during this whole retreat, followed close in the rear, and took possession of the different posts which the Americans had occupied, immediately after they were evacuated.

The British army, throughout this entire retreat, stayed right behind and took control of the different positions the Americans had held as soon as they were abandoned.

On the Sorel the pursuit stopped. The Americans had the command of the lake, and the British general deemed it prudent to wrest it from them before he advanced farther. To effect this, it was necessary to construct a number of vessels, which required time and labour. Meanwhile, General Gates was ordered to take command of the northern army, which was directed to be reinforced with six thousand militia.

On the Sorel, the chase came to an end. The Americans controlled the lake, and the British general thought it wise to take it back from them before moving further. To do this, he needed to build several ships, which took time and effort. In the meantime, General Gates was instructed to take charge of the northern army, which was to be reinforced with six thousand militia.

Canada evacuated.

Thus terminated the enterprise against Canada. It was a bold, and, at one period, promised to be a successful effort to annex that extensive province to the United Colonies. The dispositions of the Canadians favoured the measure; and had Quebec fallen, there is reason to believe the colony would have entered cordially into the union. Had a few incidents turned out fortunately; had Arnold been able to reach Quebec a few days sooner, or to cross the St. Lawrence on his first arrival—or had the gallant Montgomery not fallen in the assault of the 31st December, it is probable the expedition would have been crowned with complete success. But the radical causes of failure, putting fortune out of the question, were to be found in the lateness of the season when the troops were assembled, in a defect of the preparations necessary for such a service, and still more in the shortness of the time for which the men were enlisted. Had the expedition been successful, the practicability of maintaining the country is much to be doubted. Whilst General Montgomery lay before Quebec, and expected to obtain possession of the place, he extended his views to its preservation. His plan required a permanent army of ten thousand men; strong fortifications at Jacques Cartier, and the rapids of Richelieu; and armed vessels in the river, above the last place. With this army and these precautions, he thought the country might be defended; but not with an inferior force.

Thus ended the campaign against Canada. It was a bold effort that, at one point, seemed likely to successfully annex that vast province to the United Colonies. The Canadian population was generally supportive of the initiative, and had Quebec fallen, it's likely the colony would have joined the union enthusiastically. If a few key events had gone differently—if Arnold had reached Quebec a few days earlier, or crossed the St. Lawrence upon his arrival, or if the brave Montgomery had not died in the attack on December 31—it’s probable that the mission would have been a total success. However, the fundamental reasons for the failure, aside from luck, lay in the late timing of troop mobilization, inadequacies in the necessary preparations for such an operation, and particularly in the short duration for which the soldiers were signed up. Even if the expedition had succeeded, it’s doubtful they could have maintained control over the area. While General Montgomery was positioned outside Quebec, hopeful of taking the city, he also planned for its defense. His strategy needed a permanent force of ten thousand men, solid fortifications at Jacques Cartier and the rapids of Richelieu, and armed ships in the river above those rapids. With that military presence and those defenses, he believed the territory could be held, but not with a smaller force.

It seems, therefore, to have been an enterprise requiring means beyond the ability of congress; and the strength exhausted on it would have been more judiciously employed in securing the command of the lakes George and Champlain, and the fortified towns upon them.

It seems that this project needed resources beyond what Congress could provide, and the effort spent on it would have been better used to secure control of Lakes George and Champlain and the fortified towns around them.

While General Carleton was making preparations to enter the lakes, General Schuyler was using his utmost exertions to retain the command of them. But, so great was the difficulty of procuring workmen and materials, that he found it impossible to equip a fleet which would be equal to the exigency. It consisted of only fifteen small vessels; the largest of which was a schooner mounting twelve guns, carrying six and four pound balls. The command of this squadron, at the instance of General Washington, was given to General Arnold.

While General Carleton was getting ready to enter the lakes, General Schuyler was doing everything he could to keep control of them. However, the challenge of finding workers and materials was so significant that he couldn’t put together a fleet that would meet the demands. It only had fifteen small vessels, the largest being a schooner equipped with twelve guns that fired six and four-pound balls. The command of this squadron was entrusted to General Arnold at General Washington's suggestion.

General Carleton constructs a fleet.

With almost incredible exertions, the British general constructed a powerful fleet; and, afterwards, dragged up the rapids of St. Therese and St. John's, a vast number of long boats and other vessels, among which was a gondola weighing thirty tons. This immense work was completed in little more than three months; and, as if by magic, General Arnold saw on Lake Champlain, early in October, a fleet consisting of near thirty vessels; the largest of which, the Inflexible, carried eighteen twelve-pounders. Enters Lake Champlain.This formidable fleet, having on board General Carleton himself, and navigated by seven hundred prime seamen under the command of Captain Pringle, proceeded immediately in quest of Arnold, who was advantageously posted between the island of Valicour and the western main.

With almost unbelievable efforts, the British general built a powerful fleet; and later, hauled up the rapids of St. Therese and St. John's a huge number of longboats and other vessels, including a gondola that weighed thirty tons. This huge task was finished in just over three months; and, as if by magic, General Arnold saw a fleet of nearly thirty vessels on Lake Champlain in early October, the largest of which, the Inflexible, carried eighteen twelve-pound cannons. Enters Lake Champlain.This impressive fleet, led by General Carleton himself and manned by seven hundred skilled sailors under Captain Pringle, immediately set out to find Arnold, who was strategically positioned between the island of Valicour and the western shore.

Notwithstanding the disparity of force, a warm action ensued. A wind, unfavourable to the British, kept the Inflexible and some other large vessels at too great a distance to render any service. This circumstance enabled Arnold to keep up the engagement until night, when Captain Pringle discontinued it, and anchored his whole fleet in a line, as near the vessels of his adversary as was practicable. In this engagement, the best schooner belonging to the American flotilla was burnt, and a gondola was sunk.

Despite the difference in strength, a spirited action took place. A wind, unfavorable to the British, kept the Inflexible and a few other large ships too far away to be of any help. This allowed Arnold to maintain the fight until night, when Captain Pringle called it off and anchored his entire fleet in a line, as close to the enemy's vessels as possible. In this battle, the best schooner in the American fleet was burned, and a gondola was sunk.

Defeats the American flotilla.

In the night, Arnold attempted to escape to Ticonderoga; and, the next morning, was out of sight; but, being immediately pursued, was overtaken about noon, and brought to action a few leagues short of Crown Point. He kept up a warm engagement for about two hours, during which the vessels that were most ahead escaped to Ticonderoga. Two gallies and five gondolas, which remained, made a desperate resistance. At length one of them struck; after which Arnold ran the remaining vessels on shore, and blew them up; having first saved his men, though great efforts were made to take them.

In the dark, Arnold tried to escape to Ticonderoga, and by the next morning, he was out of sight. However, he was quickly pursued and caught around noon, just a few leagues short of Crown Point. He engaged in a fierce battle for about two hours, during which the ships that were ahead managed to get away to Ticonderoga. Two galleys and five gondolas that stayed behind put up a tough fight. Eventually, one of them was hit; after that, Arnold ran the remaining vessels ashore and blew them up, having first rescued his men, despite the heavy efforts to capture them.

On the approach of the British army, a small detachment, which had occupied Crown Point as an out-post, evacuated the place, and retired to Ticonderoga, which Schuyler determined to defend to the last extremity.

On the arrival of the British army, a small group that had been stationed at Crown Point evacuated the area and retreated to Ticonderoga, which Schuyler decided to defend at all costs.

Takes possession of Crown Point. Retires into winter quarters.

General Carleton took possession of Crown Point, and advanced a part of his fleet into Lake George, within view of Ticonderoga. His army also approached that place, as if designing to invest it; but, after reconnoitring the works, and observing the steady countenance of the garrison, he thought it too late to lay siege to the fortress. Re-embarking his army, he returned to Canada, where he placed it in winter quarters; making the Isle Aux Noix his most advanced post.

General Carleton took control of Crown Point and sent part of his fleet into Lake George, visible from Ticonderoga. His army also moved toward that location, seemingly planning to surround it; however, after surveying the fortifications and noticing the calm determination of the garrison, he decided it was too late to lay siege to the fortress. After re-embarking his army, he returned to Canada, where he set it up for winter quarters, with Isle Aux Noix as his most forward position.


CHAPTER IV.

Transactions in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet repulsed at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Measures leading to Independence.... Independence declared.

Transactions in Virginia.... Action at Great Bridge.... Norfolk evacuated.... Burnt.... Transactions in North Carolina.... Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.... Invasion of South Carolina.... British fleet turned back at Fort Moultrie.... Transactions in New York.... Steps toward Independence.... Independence declared.

 

1775
July.
Transactions in Virginia.

Whilst the war was carried on thus vigorously in the north, the southern colonies were not entirely unemployed. The convention of Virginia determined to raise two regiments of regular troops for one year, and to enlist a part of the militia as minute-men.

While the war was being fought intensely in the north, the southern colonies weren't completely inactive. The Virginia convention decided to raise two regiments of regular troops for one year and to recruit part of the militia as minute-men.

October.

Lord Dunmore, the Governor of the colony, who was joined by the most active of the disaffected, and by a number of slaves whom he had encouraged to run away from their masters, was collecting a naval force, which threatened to be extremely troublesome in a country so intersected with large navigable rivers as the colony of Virginia. With this force he carried on a slight predatory war, and, at length, attempted to burn the town of Hampton. The inhabitants, having received intimation of his design, gave notice of it to the commanding officer at Williamsburg, where some regulars and minute-men were stationed. Two companies were despatched to their assistance, who arrived just before the assault was made, and obliged the assailants to retreat, with some loss, to their vessels.

Lord Dunmore, the Governor of the colony, who was supported by some of the most active dissenters and a number of slaves he had encouraged to escape from their masters, was gathering a naval force that posed a significant threat in a region so crisscrossed with large navigable rivers as Virginia. With this force, he waged a minor predatory war and eventually tried to burn the town of Hampton. The residents, having been alerted to his plan, informed the commanding officer in Williamsburg, where some regular troops and minute-men were stationed. Two companies were sent to help them and arrived just before the attack occurred, forcing the assailants to retreat to their ships with some losses.

November 7.

In consequence of this repulse, his Lordship proclaimed martial law; summoned all persons capable of bearing arms to repair to the royal standard, or be considered as traitors; and offered freedom to all indented servants and slaves who should join him.[29]

As a result of this setback, his Lordship declared martial law; called all able-bodied individuals to join the royal standard, or be deemed traitors; and promised freedom to all indentured servants and slaves who joined him.[29]

This proclamation made some impression about Norfolk, where the Governor collected such a force of the disaffected and negroes, as gave him an entire ascendancy in that part of the colony.

This announcement had an impact in Norfolk, where the Governor gathered a force of dissatisfied individuals and enslaved people, which gave him complete control over that area of the colony.

Intelligence of these transactions being received at Williamsburg, a regiment of regulars and about two hundred minute-men, were ordered down under the command of Colonel Woodford,[30] for the defence of the inhabitants. Hearing of their approach, Lord Dunmore took a well chosen position on the north side of Elizabeth river, at the Great Bridge, where it was necessary for the provincials to cross in order to reach Norfolk; at which place he had established himself in some force. Here he erected a small fort on a piece of firm ground surrounded by a marsh, which was accessible, on either side, only by a long causeway. Colonel Woodford encamped within cannon-shot of this post, in a small village at the south end of the causeway; across which, just at its termination, he constructed a breast-work; but, being without artillery, was unable to make any attempt on the fort.

Upon receiving news of these transactions in Williamsburg, a regiment of regular soldiers and about two hundred minute-men were sent down under the command of Colonel Woodford,[30] to defend the locals. When Lord Dunmore learned of their approach, he positioned himself strategically on the north side of Elizabeth River, at the Great Bridge, which the provincials needed to cross to reach Norfolk. There, he had set up a substantial force. He built a small fort on solid ground surrounded by a marsh, which could only be accessed on both sides by a long causeway. Colonel Woodford set up camp within cannon range of this post, in a small village at the southern end of the causeway; at its end, he constructed a breastwork, but without artillery, he was unable to make any attack on the fort.

December.
Action at the Great Bridge.

In this position both parties continued for a few days, when Lord Dunmore ordered Captain Fordyce, the commanding officer at the Great Bridge, though inferior in numbers, to storm the works of the provincials. Between day-break and sunrise, this officer, at the head of about sixty grenadiers of the 14th regiment, who led the column, advanced along the causeway with fixed bayonets, against the breast-work. The alarm was immediately given; and, as is the practice with raw troops, the bravest rushed to the works, where, regardless of order, they kept up a heavy fire on the front of the British column. Captain Fordyce, though received so warmly in front, and taken in flank by a party posted on a small eminence on his right, marched up with great intrepidity, until he fell dead within a few steps of the breast-work. The column immediately broke and retreated; but being covered by the artillery of the fort, was not pursued.

In this situation, both sides held their ground for a few days, until Lord Dunmore ordered Captain Fordyce, the commanding officer at the Great Bridge, to attack the provincial positions, even though his forces were outnumbered. Just before dawn, this officer, leading about sixty grenadiers from the 14th regiment at the front, moved down the causeway with fixed bayonets toward the makeshift defenses. The alarm was sounded immediately, and as is common with inexperienced troops, the bravest soldiers rushed to the front lines, firing heavily at the British column without any regard for orders. Captain Fordyce, despite facing intense fire from the front and being attacked from the side by troops on a small hill to his right, advanced fearlessly until he was shot dead just a few steps from the fortifications. The column quickly broke and fell back, but since they had cover from the fort's artillery, they were not chased.

In this ill-judged attack, every grenadier is said to have been killed or wounded; while the Americans did not lose a single man.

In this poorly planned attack, every grenadier allegedly was either killed or injured, while the Americans didn't lose anyone.

Norfolk evacuated.

The following night, the fort was evacuated. The provincial troops proceeded to Norfolk, under the command of Colonel Howe of North Carolina, and Lord Dunmore took refuge on board his vessels.

The next night, the fort was evacuated. The provincial troops headed to Norfolk, under the command of Colonel Howe from North Carolina, while Lord Dunmore sought shelter on his ships.

1776
January.
And burnt.

After taking possession of the town, the American soldiers frequently amused themselves by firing into the vessels in the harbour, from the buildings near the water. Irritated by this, Lord Dunmore determined to destroy the houses immediately on the shore; and, on the night of the first of January, under cover of a heavy cannonade, landed a body of troops, and set fire to a number of houses near the river. The provincials, who entertained strong prejudices against this station, saw the flames spread from house to house without making any attempt to extinguish them. After the fire had continued several weeks, in which time it had consumed about four-fifths of the town, Colonel Howe, who had waited on the convention to urge the necessity of destroying the place, returned with orders to burn the remaining houses; which were carried into immediate execution.

After taking over the town, the American soldiers often entertained themselves by shooting at the boats in the harbor from the buildings near the water. Annoyed by this, Lord Dunmore decided to destroy the houses right by the shore; so, on the night of January 1st, under the cover of heavy cannon fire, he landed a group of troops and set fire to several houses near the river. The locals, who had strong biases against this station, watched the flames spread from house to house without making any effort to put them out. After the fire continued for several weeks, during which it destroyed about four-fifths of the town, Colonel Howe, who had gone to the convention to stress the need to destroy the place, returned with orders to burn the remaining houses; and this was carried out immediately.

February.

Thus was destroyed the most populous and flourishing town in Virginia. Its destruction was one of those ill-judged measures, of which the consequences are felt long after the motives are forgotten.

Thus was destroyed the most populous and thriving town in Virginia. Its destruction was one of those misguided actions, the effects of which are felt long after the reasons are forgotten.

After Norfolk was laid in ashes, Lord Dunmore continued a predatory war on the rivers—burning houses, and robbing plantations—which served only to distress a few individuals, and to increase the detestation in which he was held through the country. At length, his wretched followers, wearied with their miserable condition, were sent to Florida.[31]

After Norfolk was burned down, Lord Dunmore carried on a ruthless campaign on the rivers—setting houses on fire and stealing from plantations—which only caused suffering for a few people and increased the hatred toward him across the region. Eventually, his miserable followers, tired of their awful situation, were sent to Florida.[31]

As the war became more serious, the convention deemed it necessary to increase the number of regular regiments from two to nine, which were afterwards taken into the continental service.

As the war escalated, the convention decided it was necessary to expand the number of regular regiments from two to nine, which were later incorporated into the continental service.

Transactions in North Carolina.

In North Carolina, Governor Martin, though obliged to take refuge on board a ship of war, in Cape Fear river, indulged the hope of being able to reduce that colony.

In North Carolina, Governor Martin, although forced to seek safety on a warship in Cape Fear River, held onto the hope of being able to regain control of that colony.

A body of ignorant and disorderly men on the western frontier, styling themselves regulators, had attempted by arms, some time before the existing war, to control and stop the administration of justice. After failing in this attempt, they became as hostile to the colonial, as they had been to the royal government.

A group of uneducated and unruly men on the western frontier, calling themselves regulators, had tried to use force, some time before the current war, to take control and disrupt the justice system. After failing in this effort, they turned just as hostile towards the colonial government as they had been towards the royal government.

The province also contained many families who had lately emigrated from the highlands of Scotland; and who, retaining their attachment to the place of their nativity, transferred it to the government under which they had been bred. From the union of these parties, Governor Martin entertained sanguine hopes of making a successful struggle for North Carolina. His confidence was increased by the assurances he had received, that a considerable land and naval armament was destined for the southern colonies.

The province also had many families who had recently moved from the Scottish highlands and, while they kept their connection to their homeland, they shifted that loyalty to the government that raised them. From this combination of groups, Governor Martin felt hopeful about making a successful effort for North Carolina. His confidence grew with assurances he had received that a significant land and naval force was headed for the southern colonies.

To prepare for co-operating with this force, should it arrive; or, in any event, to make an effort to give the ascendancy in North Carolina to the royal cause, he sent several commissions to the leaders of the highlanders, for raising and commanding regiments; and granted one to a Mr. M'Donald, their chief, to act as their general. He also sent them a proclamation, to be used on a proper occasion, commanding all persons, on their allegiance, to repair to the royal standard. This was erected by General M'Donald at Cross Creek, about the middle of February, and nearly fifteen hundred men arranged themselves under it.

To get ready to work with this force if it showed up, or at least to boost support for the royal cause in North Carolina, he sent several commissions to the leaders of the highlanders to raise and lead regiments. He also gave a commission to a Mr. M'Donald, their chief, to act as their general. He sent them a proclamation to be used at the right time, ordering everyone to support the royal standard. This was set up by General M'Donald at Cross Creek around mid-February, and nearly fifteen hundred men gathered under it.

Fifteenth.

Upon the first advice that the loyalists were assembling, Brigadier General Moore marched at the head of a provincial regiment, with such militia as he could suddenly collect, and some pieces of cannon, and took a strong position within a few miles of them. Twentieth.General M'Donald soon approached, and sent a letter to Moore, enclosing the Governor's proclamation, and recommending to him and his party to join the King's standard by a given hour the next day. The negotiation was protracted by Moore, in the hope that the numerous bodies of militia who were advancing to join him, would soon enable him to surround his adversary. M'Donald, at length, perceived his danger, and, suddenly decamping, endeavoured by forced marches to extricate himself from it, and join Governor Martin and Lord William Campbell, who were encouraged to commence active operations by the arrival of General Clinton in the colony.

As soon as Brigadier General Moore heard that the loyalists were gathering, he led a provincial regiment along with the militia he could quickly assemble and some cannons, taking a strong position just a few miles away from them. 20th. General M'Donald soon arrived and sent a letter to Moore that included the Governor's proclamation, urging him and his group to join the King's side by a specific hour the next day. Moore prolonged the negotiation, hoping that the large numbers of militia on their way to join him would soon allow him to surround his opponent. Eventually, M'Donald realized he was in danger and quickly packed up, trying to march his way out of it and rejoin Governor Martin and Lord William Campbell, who were motivated to take action by the arrival of General Clinton in the colony.

Action at Moore's Creek Bridge.

The provincial parties, however, were so alert in every part of the country, that he found himself under the necessity of engaging Colonels Caswell and Lillington, who, with about one thousand minute-men and militia, had entrenched themselves directly in his front, at a place called Moore's Creek Bridge. The royalists were greatly superior in number, but were under the disadvantage of being compelled to cross the bridge, the planks of which were partly taken up, in the face of the intrenchments occupied by the provincials. They commenced the attack, however, with great spirit; but Colonel M'Leod who commanded them, in consequence of the indisposition of M'Donald, and several others of their bravest officers and men, having fallen in the first onset, their courage deserted them, and they fled in great disorder, leaving behind them their general and several others of their leaders, who fell into the hands of the provincials.[32]

The local parties, however, were so vigilant across the country that he had to enlist Colonels Caswell and Lillington, who, along with around a thousand minute-men and militia, had fortified themselves right in front of him at a location called Moore's Creek Bridge. The royalists had a significant numerical advantage but faced the disadvantage of needing to cross the bridge, the planks of which were partially removed, while facing the entrenched provincials. They launched their attack with great enthusiasm; however, Colonel M'Leod, who was leading them due to M'Donald's illness, saw many of their bravest officers and men fall in the initial charge. Their spirits collapsed, and they fled in chaos, abandoning their general and several other leaders, who were captured by the provincials.[32]

This victory was of eminent service to the American cause in North Carolina. It broke the spirits of a great body of men, who would have constituted a formidable reinforcement to an invading army; increased the confidence of the provincials in themselves, and attached to them the timid and wavering, who form a large portion of every community.

This victory greatly benefited the American cause in North Carolina. It shattered the morale of a large group of men who could have been a strong reinforcement for an invading army; it boosted the confidence of the locals in themselves, and it brought in the hesitant and uncertain, who make up a significant part of any community.

General Clinton, who was to command in the south, had left Boston with a force too inconsiderable to attempt any thing until he should be reinforced by the troops expected from Europe. After parting with Governor Tryon in New York, he had proceeded to Virginia, where he passed a few days with Lord Dunmore; but finding himself too weak to effect any thing in that province, he repaired to North Carolina, and remained with Governor Martin until the arrival of Sir Peter Parker. Fortunately for the province, the unsuccessful insurrection of M'Donald had previously broken the strength and spirits of the loyalists, and deprived them of their most active chiefs; in consequence of which, the operations which had been meditated against North Carolina were deferred. Clinton continued in Cape Fear until near the end of May, when, hearing nothing certain from General Howe, he determined to make an attempt on the capital of South Carolina.

General Clinton, who was set to command in the south, left Boston with a force that was too small to take any action until he received reinforcements from Europe. After meeting with Governor Tryon in New York, he went to Virginia, where he spent a few days with Lord Dunmore. However, finding himself too weak to accomplish anything there, he moved to North Carolina and stayed with Governor Martin until Sir Peter Parker arrived. Luckily for the province, the failed uprising led by M'Donald had already weakened the loyalists and taken away their most active leaders, which meant that the planned operations against North Carolina were postponed. Clinton stayed in Cape Fear until near the end of May, and not hearing anything definitive from General Howe, he decided to make a try for the capital of South Carolina.

May.

Early in the month of April, a letter from the secretary of state to Mr. Eden, the royal governor of Maryland, disclosing the designs of administration against the southern colonies, was intercepted in the Chesapeake; and thus, South Carolina became apprized of the danger which threatened its metropolis. Mr. Rutledge, a gentleman of vigour and talents, who had been chosen president of that province on the dissolution of the regal government, adopted the most energetic means for placing it in a posture of defence.

Early in April, a letter from the Secretary of State to Mr. Eden, the royal governor of Maryland, revealing the government’s plans against the southern colonies, was intercepted in the Chesapeake; and so, South Carolina learned about the threat to its capital. Mr. Rutledge, a skilled and energetic gentleman who had been appointed president of the province after the royal government fell apart, took strong measures to prepare it for defense.

June.
Invasion of South Carolina.

In the beginning of June, the British fleet came to anchor off the harbour of Charleston. The bar was crossed with some difficulty; after which, it was determined to commence operations by silencing a fort on Sullivan's island.

In early June, the British fleet anchored near the harbor of Charleston. They crossed the bar with some difficulty, after which they decided to start operations by taking out a fort on Sullivan's Island.

During the interval between passing the bar and attacking the fort, the continental troops of Virginia and North Carolina arrived in Charleston; and the American force amounted to between five and six thousand men, of whom two thousand five hundred were regulars. This army was commanded by General Lee, whose fortune it had been to meet General Clinton at New York, in Virginia, and in North Carolina. Viewing with a military eye the situation of the post entrusted to his care, Lee was disinclined to hazard his army by engaging it deeply in the defence of the town; but the solicitude of the South Carolinians to preserve their capital, aided by his confidence in his own vigilance, prevailed over a caution which was thought extreme, and determined him to attempt to maintain the place.

During the time between passing the bar and attacking the fort, the Continental troops from Virginia and North Carolina arrived in Charleston. The American forces totaled between five and six thousand men, with two thousand five hundred regular soldiers. This army was led by General Lee, who had previously faced General Clinton in New York, Virginia, and North Carolina. Assessing the situation of the post under his command, Lee was hesitant to risk his army by getting heavily involved in defending the town. However, the South Carolinians’ urgency to protect their capital, combined with his confidence in his own vigilance, pushed him to set aside what was considered excessive caution and decide to try to hold the position.

Two regular regiments of South Carolina, commanded by Colonels Gadsden and Moultrie, garrisoned fort Johnson and fort Moultrie. About five hundred regulars, and three hundred militia under Colonel Thompson, were stationed in some works which had been thrown up on the north-eastern extremity of Sullivan's island; and the remaining troops were arranged on Hadrell's Point, and along the bay in front of the town. General Lee remained in person with the troops at Hadrell's Point, in the rear of Sullivan's island. His position was chosen in such a manner as to enable him to observe and support the operations in every quarter, and especially to watch and oppose any attempt of the enemy to pass from Long Island to the continent; a movement of which he seems to have been particularly apprehensive.

Two regular regiments from South Carolina, led by Colonels Gadsden and Moultrie, were stationed at Fort Johnson and Fort Moultrie. Around five hundred regular troops and three hundred militia under Colonel Thompson were assigned to some defensive works established at the northeastern tip of Sullivan's Island, while the remaining troops were set up at Hadrell's Point and along the bay in front of the town. General Lee stayed with the troops at Hadrell's Point, behind Sullivan's Island. His position was strategically chosen to allow him to observe and support operations in all directions, particularly to monitor and counter any attempts by the enemy to move from Long Island to the mainland, a development he seemed especially concerned about.

June 28.
British fleet repulsed at Fort Moultrie.

The British ships, after taking their stations, commenced an incessant and heavy cannonade on the American works. Its effect, however, on the fort, was not such as had been expected. This was attributable to its form, and to its materials. It was very low, with merlons of great thickness; and was constructed of earth, and a species of soft wood common in that country, called the palmetto, which, on being struck with a ball, does not splinter, but closes upon it.

The British ships, after taking their positions, started a relentless and heavy bombardment on the American fortifications. However, the impact on the fort wasn't what they had anticipated. This was due to its design and the materials it was made of. It was quite low, with thick parapets, and it was built from earth and a type of soft wood found in that area, called palmetto, which, when hit by a cannonball, doesn't splinter but instead wraps around it.

The fire from the fort was deliberate; and, being directed with skill, did vast execution. The garrison united the cool determined courage of veterans, with the enthusiastic ardour of youth. General Lee crossed over in a boat, to determine whether he should withdraw them; and was enraptured with the ardour they displayed. They assured him they would lose the fort only with their lives; and the mortally wounded breathed their last, exhorting their fellow soldiers to the most heroic defence of the place.

The fire from the fort was intentional, and with skillful aim, it caused significant damage. The garrison combined the calm, steadfast bravery of veterans with the passionate enthusiasm of youth. General Lee crossed over in a boat to decide if he should pull them back and was thrilled by the passion they showed. They told him they would only give up the fort with their lives, and the mortally wounded took their last breaths, urging their fellow soldiers to defend the place as heroically as possible.

July 15.

The engagement continued until night. By that time, the ships were in such a condition, as to be unfit to renew the action on the ensuing day. The Bristol lost one hundred and eleven men, and the Experiment seventy-nine. Captain Scott, of the one, lost his arm; and Captain Morris, of the other, was mortally wounded. Lord Campbell, late Governor of the province, who served as a volunteer on board one of these vessels, was also mortally wounded; and both ships were so shattered, as to inspire hopes that they would be unable to repass the bar. About nine, they slipped their cables and moved off. A few days afterwards, the troops were re-embarked, and all farther designs against the southern colonies being for the present relinquished, the squadron sailed for New York.[33]

The battle went on until nightfall. By then, the ships were in such bad shape that they couldn't fight again the next day. The Bristol lost one hundred and eleven men, and the Experiment lost seventy-nine. Captain Scott from the Bristol lost his arm, and Captain Morris from the Experiment was mortally wounded. Lord Campbell, the former Governor of the province, who was volunteering on one of these ships, was also fatally injured. Both ships were so damaged that there were hopes they wouldn't make it past the bar again. Around nine, they let go of their anchors and set off. A few days later, the troops were re-embarked, and with plans for further actions against the southern colonies temporarily dropped, the squadron headed for New York.[33]

The attack on fort Moultrie was supported by the British seamen with their accustomed bravery; and the slaughter on board the ships was uncommonly great. The loss of the Americans, in killed and wounded, was only thirty-five men.

The attack on Fort Moultrie was backed by the British sailors with their usual courage, and the casualties on the ships were unusually high. The Americans lost only thirty-five men, dead or wounded.

Great and well merited praise was bestowed on Colonel Moultrie, who commanded the fort, and on the garrison, for the resolution displayed in defending it. Nor was the glory acquired on this occasion confined to them. All the troops that had been stationed on the island partook of it: and the thanks of the United Colonies were voted by congress to General Lee, Colonel Moultrie, Colonel Thompson, and the officers and men under their command.

Great and well-deserved praise was given to Colonel Moultrie, who led the fort, and to the garrison for their determination in defending it. The recognition from this event wasn't limited to just them. All the troops stationed on the island shared in it: and Congress voted to thank General Lee, Colonel Moultrie, Colonel Thompson, and the officers and men under their command.

This fortunate event, for such it may well be termed, though not of much magnitude in itself, was, like many other successes attending the American arms in the commencement of the war, of great importance in its consequences. By impressing on the colonists a conviction of their ability to maintain the contest, it increased the number of those who resolved to resist British authority, and assisted in paving the way to a declaration of independence.

This lucky event, which is accurate to call it, even if it wasn’t very significant on its own, was, like many other wins for the American forces at the start of the war, hugely important in its aftermath. By convincing the colonists that they could continue fighting, it led to more people deciding to oppose British rule and helped clear the path toward a declaration of independence.

April.
Transactions in New York.

Even before the evacuation of Boston, it had been foreseen that New York must become the seat of war; and that most important military operations would be carried on in that colony. The fortifications which had been commenced for the defence of its capital were indefatigably prosecuted; and, after the arrival of General Washington, these works, combined with those to be erected in the passes through the highlands up the Hudson, were the objects of his unremitting attention.

Even before Boston was evacuated, it was anticipated that New York would be the main battleground; and that significant military operations would take place in that area. The fortifications started to defend its capital were consistently pursued; and after General Washington arrived, these constructions, along with those planned for the passes through the highlands up the Hudson, became the focus of his relentless efforts.

The difficulty which had been experienced in expelling the British from Boston, had demonstrated the importance of preventing their establishment in New York; and had contributed to the determination of contesting with them, very seriously, the possession of that important place. The execution of this determination, however, was difficult and dangerous. The defence of New York, against an enemy commanding the sea, requires an army capable of meeting him in the open field, and of acting offensively both on Long and York Islands. Congress had not adopted measures which might raise such an army. The Commander-in-chief, in his letters to that body, had long and earnestly urged the policy of bringing the whole strength of the country into regular operation. The government was not inattentive to his remonstrances; but many circumstances combined to prevent such a military establishment as the exigency required.

The challenges faced in driving the British out of Boston highlighted the need to stop them from securing New York, which fueled the commitment to seriously contest their hold on that crucial location. However, carrying out this plan was tough and risky. Defending New York against an enemy that controlled the sea necessitated an army capable of engaging them in open battle and taking offensive action on both Long and York Islands. Congress had not put in place the measures needed to raise such an army. The Commander-in-chief had long and passionately urged Congress in his letters to mobilize the entire strength of the country for regular military action. While the government was paying attention to his concerns, various factors prevented the establishment of a military force that the situation demanded.

The congress which assembled in 1775 had adjourned with strong hopes that the differences between the Mother Country and the Colonies would soon be adjusted to their mutual satisfaction. When the temper manifested both by the king and his parliament had dissipated these hopes, and the immense preparations of Great Britain for war, evinced the necessity of preparations equally vigorous on the part of America, the resolution to make them was finally taken. But, unaccustomed to the great duties of conducting a war of vast extent, they could not estimate rightly the value of the means employed, nor calculate the effects which certain causes would produce. Opinions of the most pernicious tendency prevailed; from which they receded slowly, and from which they could be ultimately forced only by melancholy experience.

The Congress that met in 1775 had adjourned with high hopes that the issues between the Mother Country and the Colonies would be resolved to everyone’s satisfaction. However, as the attitudes shown by the king and his parliament shattered those hopes, and Great Britain's massive war preparations highlighted the need for America to also prepare vigorously, the decision to do so was finally made. But, since they were inexperienced in managing a large-scale war, they couldn’t accurately assess the value of the resources they were using or predict the impacts of certain actions. Destructive opinions were widespread; they slowly started to move away from them, but could only be fully pushed out of those beliefs through painful experiences.

The most fatal among these was the theory, that an army could be created every campaign for the purposes of that campaign; and that such temporary means would be adequate to the defence of the country. They relied confidently on being able on any emergency, to call out a force suited to the occasion:—they relied too much on the competence of such a force to the purposes of war, and they depended too long on the spirit of patriotism, which was believed to animate the mass of the people.

The most dangerous belief among these was that an army could be formed for each campaign just for that purpose; and that such temporary forces would be enough to defend the country. They confidently thought they could call up a force for any emergency:—they relied too heavily on the effectiveness of such a force for warfare, and they depended too long on the patriotic spirit they believed motivated the general population.

Under these impressions, the determination to form a permanent army was too long delayed; and the measures necessary to raise such an army were deferred, till their efficacy became doubtful. It was not until June, 1776, that the representations of the Commander-in-chief could obtain a resolution, directing soldiers to be enlisted for three years, and offering a bounty of ten dollars to each recruit. The time when this resolution could certainly have been executed, had passed away. That zeal for the service, which was manifested in the first moments of the war, had long since begun to abate; and though the determination to resist had become more general, that enthusiasm which prompts individuals to expose themselves to more than an equal share of danger and hardship, was visibly declining. The progress of these sentiments seems to have been unexpected; and the causes producing such effects appear not to have been perceived. The regiments voted by congress were incomplete; and that bounty, which, if offered in time, would have effected its object, came too late to fill them.

Under these impressions, the decision to create a permanent army was delayed for too long, and the actions needed to raise such an army were postponed until their effectiveness became uncertain. It wasn't until June 1776 that the Commander-in-chief could get a resolution passed, instructing that soldiers be recruited for three years and offering a ten-dollar bounty to each recruit. The ideal time to implement this resolution had already passed. The initial enthusiasm for the service, which was so evident at the start of the war, had significantly diminished; and while the resolve to resist became more widespread, the fervor that drives individuals to face greater risks and hardships was clearly fading. The shift in these feelings seemed unexpected, and the reasons behind such changes appear to have gone unnoticed. The regiments authorized by Congress were incomplete, and the bounty that could have achieved its purpose if offered timely came too late to fill them.

It was not in numbers only that the weakness of the American army consisted. In arms, ammunition, tents, and clothes, its deficiency was such as to render it unfit for the great purposes of war, and inferior, in all these respects, to the enemy which it was destined to encounter.

It wasn’t just in numbers that the American army was weak. In terms of weapons, ammunition, tents, and clothing, it was so lacking that it was unprepared for the major demands of war and was inferior to the enemy it was supposed to face.

But, however inadequate to the object the regular force might be, both the government and the Commander-in-chief were determined to defend New York; and congress passed a resolution to reinforce the army with thirteen thousand eight hundred militia. For the defence of the middle colonies, and for the purpose of repelling any attempt to land on the Jersey shore, it was resolved to form a flying camp, to be composed of ten thousand men, to be furnished by Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland. The militia, both of the flying camp and of the army at New York, were to be engaged to serve until the first of December; and the Commander-in-chief was empowered to call on the neighbouring colonies for such additional temporary aids of militia, as the exigencies of his army might render necessary.

But even though the regular army might not be enough for the task, both the government and the Commander-in-Chief were set on defending New York. Congress passed a resolution to boost the army with thirteen thousand eight hundred militia. To protect the middle colonies and to stop any attempt to land on the Jersey shore, they decided to create a flying camp made up of ten thousand men from Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Maryland. The militia from both the flying camp and the army in New York would serve until December 1st, and the Commander-in-Chief was authorized to request additional temporary militia support from neighboring colonies as needed for his army.

Great and embarrassing as were the difficulties already noticed, they were augmented by the disaffection of the city of New York, and of the adjacent islands. Although Governor Tryon had found it necessary to take refuge on board some ships lying in the harbour, he had been permitted to continue an open intercourse with the inhabitants, which enabled him to communicate freely with the royalists; and to concert plans of future co-operation. This intercourse was broken off by the arrival of the Commander-in-chief;—yet a plot was formed, through the agency of the mayor, to rise in favour of the British on their landing; and, as was understood, to seize and deliver up General Washington himself. This plot had extended to the American army, and even to the general's guards. It was fortunately discovered in time to be defeated; and some of the persons concerned were executed. About the same time a similar plot was discovered in the neighbourhood of Albany; and there too, executions were found necessary.

Great and embarrassing as the challenges already mentioned were, they got worse due to the discontent from the city of New York and the nearby islands. Even though Governor Tryon had to seek refuge on some ships in the harbor, he was still allowed to maintain open communication with the locals, which let him connect freely with the loyalists and plan future cooperation. This communication ended with the arrival of the Commander-in-chief; however, a conspiracy was devised, with help from the mayor, to support the British upon their arrival and, as was rumored, to capture and hand over General Washington himself. This plot reached the American army and even involved the general's guards. Fortunately, it was discovered in time to be thwarted, and some of those involved were executed. Around the same time, a similar scheme was uncovered near Albany, resulting in executions there as well.

Hitherto, the sole avowed object of the war had been a redress of grievances. The utmost horror had been expressed at the idea of attempting independence; and the most anxious desire of re-establishing the union which had so long subsisted between the two countries on its ancient principles, was openly and generally declared. But however sincere these declarations might have been at the commencement of the conflict, the operation of hostilities was infallible. To profess allegiance and respect for a monarch with whom they were at open war, was an absurdity too great to be long continued. The human mind, when it receives a strong impulse, does not, like projectiles, stop at the point to which the force originally applied may have been calculated to carry it. Various causes act upon it in its course. When the appeal was made to arms, a great majority of those who guided the councils and led the forces of America, wished only for a repeal of the acts of parliament which had occasioned their resistance to the authority of the crown; and would have been truly unwilling to venture upon the unexplored field of self-government. For some time, prayers were offered for the king, in the performance of divine service; and, in the proclamation of a fast by congress, in June, 1775, one of the motives for recommending it, was, to beseech the Almighty "to bless our rightful sovereign King George III. and inspire him with wisdom."

Until now, the main reason for the war had been to address grievances. There was a lot of horror expressed at the thought of seeking independence, and a strong desire to restore the union that had existed between the two countries based on its original principles was widely stated. However sincere these statements might have been at the start of the conflict, the reality of warfare was undeniable. To claim loyalty to a monarch with whom they were engaged in open war was an absurdity that couldn't last long. The human mind, when it experiences a strong push, doesn’t just stop at the initial point of force; various factors influence its path. When the decision was made to take up arms, a large majority of those leading America’s councils and forces simply wanted a repeal of the parliamentary acts that had triggered their resistance to the crown's authority; they would have been quite hesitant to enter the uncharted territory of self-governance. For a time, prayers were offered for the king during religious services, and in a fast proclaimed by Congress in June 1775, one of the reasons for it was to ask the Almighty "to bless our rightful sovereign King George III and inspire him with wisdom."

 

Independence Hall

Independence Hall

Independence Hall, Philadelphia

Independence Hall, Philly

In this unpretentious brick building, erected in 1729-34, and intimately associated with the birth of the nation, the Continental Congress met, Washington was made Commander-in-Chief of the American army in 1775, and the Declaration of Independence was adopted on July 4, 1776, and read to the people assembled in the street. It is now a museum of Revolutionary and historical relics.

In this simple brick building, built between 1729 and 1734, and closely linked to the founding of the nation, the Continental Congress met, Washington was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the American army in 1775, and the Declaration of Independence was adopted on July 4, 1776, then announced to the crowd gathered outside. It is now a museum showcasing Revolutionary and historical artifacts.

 

Measures leading to independence.

The prejudices in favour of a connexion with England, and of the English constitution, gradually, but rapidly yielded to republican principles, and a desire for independence. New strength was every day added to the opinions, that a cordial reconciliation with Great Britain had become impossible; that mutual confidence could never be restored; that reciprocal jealousy, suspicion, and hate, would take the place of that affection, which could alone render such a connexion happy and beneficial; that even the commercial dependence of America upon Britain, was greatly injurious to the former, and that incalculable benefits must be derived from opening to themselves the markets of the world; that to be governed by a distant nation or sovereign, unacquainted with, and unmindful of their interests, would, even if reinstated in their former situation, be an evil too great to be voluntarily borne. But victory alone could restore them to that situation—and victory would give them independence. The hazard was the same; and since the risk of every thing was unavoidable, the most valuable object ought, in common justice, and common prudence, to be the reward of success. With such horror, too, did they view the present war, as to suppose it could not possibly receive the support of a free people. The alacrity therefore with which the English nation entered into it, was ascribed to a secret and dangerous influence, which was, with rapid progress, undermining the liberties and the morals of the Mother Country; and which, it was feared, would cross the Atlantic, and infect the principles of the colonists likewise, should the ancient connexion be restored. The intercourse of America with the world, and her own experience, had not then been sufficient to teach her the important truth, that the many, as often as the few, can abuse power, and trample on the weak, without perceiving that they are tyrants; that they too, not unfrequently, close their eyes against the light; and shut their ears against the plainest evidence, and the most conclusive reasoning.

The biases favoring a connection with England and the English constitution gradually but quickly gave way to republican principles and a desire for independence. Every day, more support was added to the belief that a friendly reconciliation with Great Britain had become impossible; that trust between them could never be rebuilt; that mutual jealousy, suspicion, and hatred would replace the affection that could make such a connection happy and beneficial; that even America’s economic dependence on Britain was seriously harmful to the former, and that immense benefits would come from opening up global markets; that being governed by a distant nation or ruler who did not understand or care for their interests would be, even if they returned to their old situation, an unbearable burden. But only victory could bring them back to that situation—and victory would bring them independence. The risk was the same; and since the chance of losing everything was unavoidable, the most valuable goal should, out of common justice and common sense, be the reward for success. They viewed the current war with such dread that they believed it could never have the support of a free people. The eagerness with which the English nation engaged in it was attributed to a hidden and dangerous influence that was rapidly undermining the liberties and morals of the Mother Country, and which, it was feared, would cross the Atlantic and corrupt the principles of the colonists too, if the old connection were restored. America's interactions with the world and her own experiences had not yet taught her the important truth that the many, just as often as the few, can misuse power and oppress the weak, without realizing they are being tyrants; that they too, not infrequently, close their eyes to the truth and ignore the clearest evidence and the most persuasive reasoning.

It was also urged, with great effect, that the possibility of obtaining foreign aid would be much increased by holding out the dismemberment of the British empire, to the rivals of that nation, as an inducement to engage in the contest.

It was also strongly suggested that the chance of getting foreign aid would be greatly boosted by presenting the breakup of the British empire to its rivals as a motivation to join the fight.

American independence became the general theme of conversation; and more and more the general wish. The measures of congress took their complexion from the temper of the people. Their proceedings against the disaffected became more and more vigorous; their language respecting the British government was less the language of subjects, and better calculated to turn the public attention towards congress and the provincial assemblies, as the sole and ultimate rulers of the country. General letters of marque and reprisal were granted; and the American ports were opened to all nations and people, not subject to the British crown.

American independence became the main topic of conversation and increasingly the common desire. The actions of Congress reflected the mood of the people. Their efforts against those who opposed them became more intense; their comments about the British government shifted from the tone of subjects to a stance that aimed to focus public attention on Congress and the provincial assemblies as the true rulers of the country. Letters of marque and reprisal were issued, and American ports were opened to all nations and people not under the British crown.

May 6.

At length, a measure was adopted, which was considered by congress and by America in general, as deciding the question of independence. Hitherto, it had been recommended to particular colonies, to establish temporary institutions for the conduct of their affairs during the existence of the contest; but now, a resolution was offered, recommending generally to such colonies as had not already established them, the adoption of governments adequate to the exigency. Mr. John Adams, Mr. Rutledge, and Mr. Richard Henry Lee, all zealous advocates for independence, were appointed a committee, to prepare a proper preamble to the resolution. The report of these gentlemen was accepted, and the resolution passed.[34]

At last, a measure was adopted that was seen by Congress and by Americans in general as a decision on the question of independence. Until then, it had been recommended to specific colonies to set up temporary institutions to manage their affairs during the conflict; but now, a resolution was proposed, recommending to those colonies that hadn’t established them yet to adopt governments fitting for the situation. Mr. John Adams, Mr. Rutledge, and Mr. Richard Henry Lee, all strong supporters of independence, were appointed to a committee to draft a suitable preamble for the resolution. The report from these gentlemen was accepted, and the resolution was passed.[34]

May 15.

The provincial assemblies and conventions acted on this recommendation; and governments were generally established. In Connecticut and Rhode Island, it was deemed unnecessary to make any change in their actual situation, because, in those colonies, the executive, as well as the whole legislature, had always been elected by themselves. In Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York, some hesitation was at first discovered; and the assemblies appeared unwilling to take this decisive step. The public opinion, however, was in favour of it, and finally prevailed.

The local assemblies and conventions took action on this recommendation, and governments were mostly set up. In Connecticut and Rhode Island, it was considered unnecessary to make any changes since, in those colonies, the executive and the entire legislature had always been elected by the people themselves. In Maryland, Pennsylvania, and New York, there was some initial hesitation, and the assemblies seemed reluctant to take this important step. However, public opinion supported it, and ultimately, it won out.

The several colonies, now contemplating themselves as sovereign states, and mingling with the arduous duty of providing means to repel a powerful enemy, the important and interesting labour of framing governments for themselves and their posterity, exhibited the novel spectacle of matured and enlightened societies, uninfluenced by external or internal force, devising, according to their own judgments, political systems for their own government.

The various colonies, now seeing themselves as independent states, and dealing with the tough job of figuring out how to defend against a strong enemy, along with the significant task of creating governments for themselves and future generations, presented a unique sight of developed and informed societies, free from outside or internal pressure, designing political systems for their own governance based on their own decisions.

With the exceptions already stated, of Connecticut and Rhode Island, whose systems had ever been in a high degree democratic, the hitherto untried principle was adopted, of limiting the departments of governments by a written constitution, prescribing bounds not to be transcended by the legislature itself.

With the exceptions already stated, of Connecticut and Rhode Island, whose systems had always been quite democratic, the previously untested principle was adopted, which involved restricting government departments by a written constitution, setting limits that the legislature itself could not exceed.

The solid foundations of a popular government were already laid in all the colonies. The institutions received from England were admirably calculated to prepare the way for temperate and rational republics. No hereditary powers had ever existed; and every authority had been derived either from the people or the king. The crown being no longer acknowledged, the people remained the only source of legitimate power. The materials in their possession, as well as their habits of thinking, were adapted only to governments in all respects representative; and such governments were universally adopted.

The solid foundations of a popular government were already established in all the colonies. The institutions inherited from England were perfectly designed to pave the way for balanced and reasonable republics. There had never been any hereditary powers; all authority came either from the people or the king. With the crown no longer recognized, the people became the sole source of legitimate power. The resources they had, along with their way of thinking, were suited only for fully representative governments, which were widely accepted.

The provincial assemblies, under the influence of congress, took up the question of independence; and, in some instances, authorized their representatives in the great national council, to enter into foreign alliances. Many declared themselves in favour of a total and immediate separation from Great Britain; and gave instructions to their representatives conforming to this sentiment.

The provincial assemblies, influenced by Congress, began discussing independence and, in some cases, allowed their representatives in the national council to form foreign alliances. Many declared their support for a complete and immediate break from Great Britain and instructed their representatives to act according to this position.

June 7.

Thus supported by public opinion, congress determined to take this decisive step; and on the 7th of June, a resolution to that effect was moved by Richard Henry Lee, and seconded by John Adams. The resolution was referred to a committee, who reported it in the following terms. "Resolved, that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; and that all political connexion between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved."

Thus backed by public opinion, Congress decided to take this crucial step; on June 7th, a resolution to that effect was proposed by Richard Henry Lee and supported by John Adams. The resolution was sent to a committee, which reported it in the following terms: "Resolved, that these United Colonies are, and should rightfully be, free and independent states; and that all political connections between them and the state of Great Britain are, and should be, completely dissolved."

June 28.

This resolution was referred to a committee of the whole, in which it was debated on Saturday the 8th, and Monday the 10th of June. It appearing that New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina were not yet matured for the measure, but were fast advancing to that state, the debate was adjourned to the first of July, when it was resumed. In the mean time, a committee[35] was appointed to prepare the declaration of independence, which was reported on the 28th of June, and laid on the table. On the first of July the debate on the original resolution was resumed. The question was put in the evening of that day, and carried in the affirmative by the votes of New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia, against Pennsylvania and South Carolina. Delaware was divided; and the delegates from New York, having declared their approbation of the resolution, and their conviction that it was approved by their constituents also, but that their instructions, which had been drawn near twelve months before, enjoined them to do nothing which might impede reconciliation with the mother country, were permitted to withdraw from the question. The report of the committee was put off till the next day at the request of Mr. Rutledge of South Carolina, who expressed the opinion that his colleagues would then concur in the resolution for the sake of unanimity. July 2.The next day South Carolina did concur in it. The votes of Pennsylvania and Delaware were also changed by the arrival of other members. Congress then proceeded to consider the declaration of independence. After some amendments[36] it was approved, and signed by every member present except Mr. Dickenson.[37]

This resolution was sent to a committee of the whole, where it was debated on Saturday, June 8th, and Monday, June 10th. It appeared that New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and South Carolina were not quite ready for the measure but were quickly working toward that point, so the debate was postponed until July 1st, when it resumed. In the meantime, a committee[35] was set up to prepare the declaration of independence, which was reported on June 28th and presented. On July 1st, the debate on the original resolution continued. The question was put to a vote that evening and passed in favor by the votes of New Hampshire, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and Georgia, against Pennsylvania and South Carolina. Delaware was split; and the delegates from New York, having expressed their support for the resolution and their belief that their constituents also supported it, but noting that their instructions from nearly a year prior mandated they do nothing to hinder reconciliation with England, were allowed to abstain from the vote. The committee's report was postponed until the next day at the request of Mr. Rutledge from South Carolina, who believed that his colleagues would agree to the resolution for the sake of unity. July 2nd. The following day, South Carolina agreed to it. The votes from Pennsylvania and Delaware also changed with the arrival of other members. Congress then moved forward to discuss the declaration of independence. After some amendments[36], it was approved and signed by every member present except Mr. Dickenson.[37]

Independence declared.
July 4.

This declaration was immediately communicated to the armies, who received it with enthusiasm. It was also proclaimed throughout the United States, and was generally approved by those who had engaged in the opposition to the claims of the British Parliament. Some few individuals, who had been zealous supporters of all measures which had for their object only a redress of grievances, and in whose bosoms the hope of accommodation still lingered,—either too timid to meet the arduous conflict which this measure rendered inevitable, or, sincerely believing that the happiness of America would be best consulted by preserving their political connexion with Great Britain, viewed the dissolution of that connexion with regret. Others, who afterwards deserted the American cause, attributed their defection to this measure. It was also an unfortunate truth, that in the whole country between New England and the Potowmac, which was now become the great theatre of action, although the majority was in favour of independence, a formidable minority existed, who not only refused to act with their countrymen, but were ready to give to the enemy every aid in their power.

This announcement was quickly shared with the armies, who welcomed it with excitement. It was also announced throughout the United States and was generally supported by those who had opposed the British Parliament's claims. A few individuals, who had strongly supported all efforts aimed solely at addressing grievances, and who still held onto the hope of a compromise—either too fearful to face the tough battle this decision made necessary, or genuinely believing that America's happiness would be best served by maintaining their political connection with Great Britain—saw the end of that connection with sadness. Others, who later abandoned the American cause, blamed their change of heart on this decision. It was also sadly true that across the entire region from New England to the Potomac, which had now become the main stage for action, although the majority favored independence, a significant minority not only refused to join their fellow citizens but was also willing to assist the enemy in any way they could.

It can not, however, be questioned, that the declaration of independence was wise, and well-timed. The soundest policy required that the war should no longer be a contest between subjects and their acknowledged sovereign.

It cannot, however, be questioned that the declaration of independence was wise and well-timed. The best policy demanded that the war should no longer be a struggle between subjects and their recognized ruler.


CHAPTER V.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive before New York.... Circular letter of Lord Howe.... State of the American Army.... The British land in force on Long Island.... Battle of Brooklyn.... Evacuation of Long Island.... Fruitless negotiations.... New York evacuated.... Skirmish on the heights of Haerlem.... Letter on the state of the army.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive in front of New York.... Circular letter from Lord Howe.... Condition of the American Army.... The British land heavily on Long Island.... Battle of Brooklyn.... Withdrawal from Long Island.... Unsuccessful negotiations.... New York is evacuated.... Skirmish on the heights of Harlem.... Letter about the condition of the army.

 

1776

While congress was deliberating in Philadelphia on the great question of independence, the British fleet appeared before New York.

While Congress was debating in Philadelphia on the important issue of independence, the British fleet showed up in New York.

Lord and Sir William Howe arrive before New York.

On evacuating Boston, General Howe had retired to Halifax; where he purposed to remain till reinforcements should arrive from England. But the situation of his army in that place was so uncomfortable, and the delays in the arrival of the troops from Europe were so great, that he at length resolved to sail for New York, with the forces already under his command.

On leaving Boston, General Howe went back to Halifax, where he planned to stay until reinforcements came from England. However, the conditions for his army there were so unpleasant, and the delays in getting troops from Europe were so long, that he eventually decided to head to New York with the forces he already had.

June 10.

In the latter end of June, he arrived off Sandy Hook, in the Grey Hound; and, on the 29th of that month, the first division of the fleet from Halifax reached that place. The rear division soon followed; and the troops were landed on Staten Island, July 3 & 4.on the third and fourth of July. They were received with great demonstrations of joy by the inhabitants, who took the oaths of allegiance to the British crown, and embodied themselves under the authority of the late Governor Tryon, for the defence of the island. Strong assurances were also received from Long Island, and the neighbouring parts of New Jersey, of the favourable dispositions of a great proportion of the people to the royal cause.

In late June, he arrived off Sandy Hook on the Grey Hound, and on the 29th of that month, the first division of the fleet from Halifax reached that location. The second division soon followed, and the troops landed on Staten Island, July 3 & 4. on July 3rd and 4th. They were welcomed with great enthusiasm by the locals, who pledged their allegiance to the British crown and organized themselves under the authority of the former Governor Tryon to defend the island. Strong assurances were also received from Long Island and nearby parts of New Jersey about the favorable attitudes of many residents toward the royal cause.

It was foreseen that the provisions remaining on the small islands about New York, must fall into the possession of the invading army, and General Washington had intended to remove them to a place of safety; but, the existing state of public opinion requiring the co-operation of the several committees, this measure of wise precaution could not be completely executed; and General Howe, on his arrival, obtained ample supplies for his army.

It was expected that the supplies left on the small islands near New York would be taken by the invading army, and General Washington had planned to move them to a safe location; however, the current state of public opinion demanded cooperation from various committees, so this prudent measure couldn't be fully carried out. As a result, General Howe, upon his arrival, secured plenty of supplies for his army.

The command of the fleet destined for the American service was intrusted to Lord Howe, the brother of the general; and they were both constituted commissioners for restoring peace to the colonies, and granting pardons, with such exceptions as they should think proper to make. He arrived at Staten Island on the twelfth of July.

The command of the fleet assigned to American service was given to Lord Howe, who was the general's brother; they were both appointed as commissioners to restore peace in the colonies and to grant pardons, with any exceptions they deemed appropriate. He arrived at Staten Island on July twelfth.

July 12.

The difficulty of closing the Hudson against an enemy possessing a powerful fleet was soon demonstrated. Two frigates passed the batteries without injury, and took a station which enabled them to cut off the communication by water, between the army at New York, and that at Ticonderoga. An attempt to set these frigates on fire failed in its execution, and only a tender was burnt;—soon after which these vessels returned to the fleet.

The challenge of shutting down the Hudson River against an enemy with a strong fleet was quickly shown. Two frigates went past the defenses without getting damaged and took a position that allowed them to interrupt the water communication between the army in New York and the one in Ticonderoga. An attempt to set these frigates on fire didn’t work out, and only a supply boat was burned; shortly after, these vessels went back to the fleet.

Circular letter of Lord Howe.
July 14.

Lord Howe was not deterred by the declaration of Independence from trying the influence of his powers for pacification. He sent on shore, by a flag, a circular letter, dated off the coast of Massachusetts, addressed severally to the late governors under the crown, enclosing a declaration, which he requested them to make public. This declaration announced his authority to grant pardons to any number or description of persons, who, during the tumult and disorders of the times, might have deviated from their just allegiance, and who might be willing, by a speedy return to their duty, to reap the benefits of the royal favour; and to declare any colony, town, port, or place, in the peace and under the protection of the crown, and excepted from the penal provisions of the act of parliament prohibiting all trade and intercourse with the colonies. Assurances were also given that the meritorious services of all persons who should aid and assist in restoring public tranquillity in the colonies, or in any parts thereof, would be duly considered.

Lord Howe wasn't discouraged by the Declaration of Independence from using his powers to promote peace. He sent a circular letter to the former governors loyal to the crown by flag, dated off the coast of Massachusetts, asking them to share it publicly. This letter declared his authority to offer pardons to anyone who might have strayed from their rightful loyalty during the chaos of the times, as long as they were willing to quickly return to their duties to enjoy the benefits of royal favor. It also stated that he could declare any colony, town, port, or location to be at peace and under the crown's protection, exempt from the laws banning all trade and interaction with the colonies. He also assured that the valuable contributions of anyone who helped restore peace in the colonies or any of their areas would be properly acknowledged.

July 19.

These papers were immediately transmitted by the Commander-in-chief to congress, who resolved that they should "be published in the several gazettes, that the good people of the United States might be informed of what nature were the commissioners, and what the terms, with the expectation of which, the insidious court of Britain had sought to amuse and disarm them; and that the few who still remained suspended by a hope, founded either in the justice or moderation of their late king, might now, at length, be convinced, that the valour alone of their country is to save its liberties."

These documents were promptly sent by the Commander-in-Chief to Congress, which decided that they should "be published in various newspapers so that the good people of the United States could understand the nature of the commissioners and the terms with which the deceitful British court tried to distract and disarm them; and that the few who still held onto hope, based on either the fairness or restraint of their former king, might finally be convinced that only the bravery of their country can protect its freedoms."

About the same time, Lord Howe sent, with a flag, a letter addressed to "George Washington, esquire," which the General refused to receive, as "it did not acknowledge the public character with which he was invested by congress, and in no other character could he have any intercourse with his lordship." In a resolution approving this proceeding, congress directed, "that no letter or message be received on any occasion whatever from the enemy, by the Commander-in-chief, or others, the commanders of the American army, but such as shall be directed to them in the characters they respectively sustain."

About the same time, Lord Howe sent a letter with a flag addressed to "George Washington, Esquire," which the General refused to accept, stating that "it did not recognize the official role granted to him by Congress, and he could only communicate with his lordship in that capacity." In a resolution supporting this decision, Congress directed that "no letter or message from the enemy should be received at any time by the Commander-in-chief or others commanding the American army, except those addressed to them in their official capacities."

July 20.

The commissioners felt some difficulty in recognizing either the civil or military character conferred on individuals by the existing powers in America; and yet it was desirable, either for the purpose of effecting a pacification, or, if that should be impracticable, of increasing the divisions already existing, to open negotiations, and hold out the semblance of restoring peace. They cast about for means to evade this preliminary obstacle to any discussion of the terms they were authorized to propose; and, at length, Colonel Patterson, adjutant general of the British army, was sent on shore by General Howe, with a letter directed to George Washington, &c. &c. &c. He was introduced to the general, whom he addressed by the title of "Excellency;" and, after the usual compliments, opened the subject of his mission, by saying, that General Howe much regretted the difficulties which had arisen respecting the address of the letters; that the mode adopted was deemed consistent with propriety, and was founded on precedent, in cases of ambassadors and plenipotentiaries, where disputes or difficulties had arisen about rank; that General Washington might recollect he had, last summer, addressed a letter to "the honourable William Howe;" that Lord, and General Howe, did not mean to derogate from his rank, or the respect due to him, and that they held his person and character in the highest esteem;—but that the direction, with the addition of &c. &c. &c. implied every thing which ought to follow. Colonel Patterson then produced a letter which he said was the same that had been sent, and which he laid on the table.

The commissioners found it challenging to recognize either the civil or military roles given to individuals by the current powers in America. Still, it was important, whether for the sake of achieving peace or, if that wasn't possible, to further existing divisions, to start negotiations and create the illusion of restoring peace. They looked for ways to bypass this initial hurdle to discussing the terms they were authorized to propose. Eventually, Colonel Patterson, the adjutant general of the British army, was sent ashore by General Howe with a letter addressed to George Washington, etc. He was introduced to the general, addressing him as "Excellency," and after the usual pleasantries, he began his mission by stating that General Howe was very sorry about the issues that had come up regarding how the letters were addressed. He explained that the method used was considered appropriate and was based on previous cases involving ambassadors and plenipotentiaries when disputes about rank had occurred. He noted that General Washington might remember sending a letter to "the honorable William Howe" last summer; that neither Lord Howe nor General Howe intended to diminish Washington's rank or the respect he deserved, and they held his person and character in the highest regard. However, the address, with the addition of etc. implied everything that should follow. Colonel Patterson then presented a letter, claiming it was the same one that had been sent, and placed it on the table.

The General declined receiving it, and said, that a letter directed to a person in a public character, should have some description or indication of that character; otherwise it would be considered as a mere private letter. It was true the etceteras implied every thing, and they also implied any thing; that the letter to General Howe, alluded to, was an answer to one received from him under a like address; which, having been taken by the officer on duty, he did not think proper to return, and therefore answered in the same mode of address; and that he should absolutely decline any letter relating to his public station, directed to him as a private person.

The General refused to accept it and stated that a letter addressed to someone in a public position should have some indication of that role; otherwise, it would be seen as just a private letter. It was true that the etceteras implied everything, and they could also imply anything. The letter to General Howe, which was referenced, was a response to one he had received under a similar address. Since the officer on duty had taken that letter, the General did not feel it was appropriate to return it, so he responded in the same way it was addressed. He made it clear that he would completely refuse any letter regarding his public position if it was addressed to him as a private individual.

Colonel Patterson then said, that General Howe would not urge his delicacy farther, and repeated his assertions that no failure of respect was intended.

Colonel Patterson then said that General Howe wouldn’t push his delicate nature any further and reiterated that there was no intention of disrespect.

After some conversation relative to the treatment of prisoners, Colonel Patterson said, that the goodness and benevolence of the king had induced him to appoint Lord Howe, and General Howe, his commissioners to accommodate the unhappy dispute at present subsisting: that they had great powers, and would derive much pleasure from effecting the accommodation; and that he wished this visit to be considered as the first advance towards so desirable an object.

After some discussion about how prisoners are treated, Colonel Patterson said that the kindness and generosity of the king had led him to appoint Lord Howe and General Howe as commissioners to resolve the unfortunate conflict currently happening. He mentioned that they had significant authority and would take great pleasure in achieving this resolution, and he hoped this visit would be seen as the first step toward such a desirable goal.

General Washington replied, that he was not vested with any powers on this subject; but he would observe that, so far as he could judge from what had yet transpired, Lord Howe and General Howe were only empowered to grant pardons; that those who had committed no fault, wanted no pardon; and that the Americans were only defending what they deemed their indubitable rights. This, Colonel Patterson said, would open a very wide field for argument: and, after expressing his fears that an adherence to forms might obstruct business of the greatest moment and concern, he took his leave.

General Washington responded that he didn’t have any authority regarding this matter; however, he noted that, from what he could see so far, Lord Howe and General Howe were only authorized to grant pardons. Those who had done nothing wrong didn’t need a pardon, and the Americans were simply defending what they believed were their undeniable rights. Colonel Patterson remarked that this would lead to a very broad discussion. After sharing his concerns that sticking to procedures might hinder important business, he said goodbye.

The substance of this conversation was communicated to congress, who directed its publication.

The details of this conversation were shared with Congress, who ordered it to be published.

August.

The reinforcements to the British army, of whom about four hundred and fifty had been captured by the American cruisers, were now arriving daily from Europe; and General Howe had also been joined by the troops from Charleston. His strength was estimated at twenty-four thousand men.

The reinforcements for the British army, around four hundred and fifty of whom had been captured by American ships, were now arriving daily from Europe; and General Howe had also been joined by the troops from Charleston. His total strength was estimated at twenty-four thousand men.

State of the American army.

To this army, alike formidable for its numbers, its discipline, and its equipments,—aided in its operations by a numerous fleet, and conducted by commanders of skill and experience, was opposed a force, unstable in its nature,—incapable, from its structure, of receiving discipline,—and inferior to its enemy, in numbers, in arms, and in every military equipment. It consisted, when General Howe landed on Staten Island, of ten thousand men, who were much enfeebled by sickness. The diseases which always afflict new troops, were increased by exposure to the rain and night air, without tents. At the instance of the General, some regiments, stationed in the different states, were ordered to join him; and, in addition to the requisitions of men to serve until December—requisitions not yet complied with—the neighbouring militia were called into service for the exigency of the moment. Yet, in a letter written to congress on the 8th of August, he stated that "for the several posts on New York, Long, and Governor's Island, and Paulus Hook, the army consisted of only seventeen thousand two hundred and twenty-five men, of whom three thousand six hundred and sixty-eight were sick; and that, to repel an immediate attack, he could count certainly on no other addition to his numbers, than a battalion from Maryland under the command of Colonel Smallwood." This force was rendered the more inadequate to its objects by being necessarily divided for the defence of posts, some of which were fifteen miles distant from others, with navigable waters between them.

To this army, strong in numbers, discipline, and equipment—backed by a large fleet and led by skilled and experienced commanders—a force was opposed that was unstable, unable to maintain discipline due to its structure, and inferior to its enemy in numbers, arms, and military supplies. When General Howe landed on Staten Island, it consisted of ten thousand men, who were weakened by illness. The diseases that typically affect new troops were made worse by exposure to rain and cold nights without tents. At the General's request, some regiments stationed in different states were ordered to join him, and in addition to the requests for men to serve until December—requests that had not yet been met—the local militia were called up for the urgent situation. Yet, in a letter written to Congress on August 8, he stated that "for the various posts on New York, Long, and Governor's Island, and Paulus Hook, the army consisted of only seventeen thousand two hundred and twenty-five men, of whom three thousand six hundred and sixty-eight were sick; and that, to repel an immediate attack, he could certainly count on no additional numbers other than a battalion from Maryland under Colonel Smallwood." This force was made even more inadequate for its tasks as it had to be divided to defend posts, some of which were fifteen miles apart with navigable waters in between.

"These things," continued the letter, "are melancholy, but they are nevertheless true. I hope for better. Under every disadvantage, my utmost exertions shall be employed to bring about the great end we have in view; and, so far as I can judge from the professions and apparent dispositions of my troops, I shall have their support. The superiority of the enemy, and the expected attack, do not seem to have depressed their spirits. These considerations lead me to think that though the appeal may not terminate so happily as I could wish, yet the enemy will not succeed in their views without considerable loss. Any advantage they may gain, I trust will cost them dear."

"These things," continued the letter, "are sad, but they are still true. I hope for better days. Despite all the challenges, I will do everything I can to achieve our important goal; and, from what I can see of my troops’ attitudes and commitment, I believe they will support me. The enemy's strength and the anticipated assault don't seem to have dampened their spirits. These thoughts make me think that even if the outcome isn't as positive as I’d like, the enemy won’t reach their objectives without significant losses. Any gains they make, I hope, will come at a high cost."

Soon after this letter, the army was reinforced by Smallwood's regiment, and by two regiments from Pennsylvania, with a body of New England and New York militia, which increased it to twenty-seven thousand men, of whom one fourth were sick.

Soon after this letter, the army was strengthened by Smallwood's regiment, along with two regiments from Pennsylvania, and a group of New England and New York militia, bringing the total to twenty-seven thousand men, of whom one fourth were ill.

A part of the army was stationed on Long Island, under the command of Major General Sullivan. The residue occupied different stations on York Island, except two small detachments, one on Governor's Island, and the other at Paulus Hook; and except a part of the New York militia under General Clinton, who were stationed on the Sound, towards New Rochelle, and about East and West Chester, in order to oppose any sudden attempt which might be made to land above Kingsbridge, and cut off the communication with the country.

A section of the army was stationed on Long Island, led by Major General Sullivan. The rest occupied various positions on York Island, except for two small detachments: one on Governor's Island and the other at Paulus Hook. Additionally, part of the New York militia, under General Clinton, was positioned on the Sound, around New Rochelle, and near East and West Chester, to counter any sudden moves to land above Kingsbridge and sever communications with the mainland.

July 2.

Expecting daily to be attacked, and believing that the influence of the first battle would be considerable, the Commander-in-chief employed every expedient which might act upon that enthusiastic love of liberty, that indignation against the invaders of their country, and that native courage, which were believed to animate the bosoms of his soldiers; and which were relied on as substitutes for discipline and experience. "The time," say his orders issued soon after the arrival of General Howe, "is now near at hand, which must determine whether Americans are to be freemen or slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their houses and farms are to be pillaged and destroyed, and themselves consigned to a state of wretchedness from which no human efforts will deliver them. The fate of unborn millions will now depend, under God, on the courage and conduct of this army. Our cruel and unrelenting enemy leaves us only the choice of a brave resistance, or the most abject submission. We have therefore to resolve to conquer or to die. Our own, our country's honour, call upon us for a vigorous and manly exertion; and if we now shamefully fail, we shall become infamous to the whole world. Let us then rely on the goodness of our cause, and the aid of the Supreme Being, in whose hands victory is, to animate and encourage us to great and noble actions. The eyes of all our countrymen are now upon us, and we shall have their blessings and praises, if happily we are the instruments of saving them from the tyranny meditated against them. Let us therefore animate and encourage each other, and show the whole world that a freeman contending for liberty, on his own ground, is superior to any slavish mercenary on earth."

Expecting to be attacked daily and believing that the outcome of the first battle would be significant, the Commander-in-chief used every strategy to tap into the passionate love for freedom, the anger towards the invaders of their country, and the natural courage that were thought to inspire his soldiers. These qualities were relied upon as substitutes for discipline and experience. "The time," his orders after General Howe's arrival said, "is now approaching that will determine whether Americans will be free or enslaved; whether they will have any property they can claim as their own; whether their homes and farms will be plundered and destroyed, leaving them in a state of misery from which no effort can save them. The fate of future generations now depends, with God's help, on the courage and actions of this army. Our cruel and relentless enemy gives us only the choice between brave resistance or complete submission. We must therefore resolve to conquer or die. Our own, and our country's honor, calls us to act with vigor and strength; if we fail disgracefully now, we will be infamous in the eyes of the world. Let us trust in the righteousness of our cause and the support of the Supreme Being, who holds victory, to inspire and motivate us to achieve great and noble deeds. All our fellow countrymen are watching us, and we will earn their blessings and gratitude if we successfully protect them from the tyranny that threatens them. Let us therefore inspire and encourage one another, showing the world that a free person fighting for liberty on their own land is superior to any mercenary on earth."

To the officers, he recommended coolness in time of action; and to the soldiers, strict attention and obedience, with a becoming firmness and spirit.

To the officers, he advised staying calm during action; and to the soldiers, he stressed the importance of being attentive and obedient, along with a respectable firmness and spirit.

He assured them that any officer, soldier, or corps, distinguished by any acts of extraordinary bravery, should most certainly meet with notice and rewards; whilst, on the other hand, those who should fail in the performance of their duty, would as certainly be exposed and punished.

He assured them that any officer, soldier, or unit who showed extraordinary bravery would definitely receive recognition and rewards; meanwhile, those who failed in their duties would definitely be exposed and punished.

July 21.

Whilst preparations were making for the expected engagement, intelligence was received of the repulse of the British squadron which had attacked fort Moultrie. The Commander-in-chief availed himself of the occasion of communicating this success to his army, to add a spirit of emulation to the other motives which should impel them to manly exertions. "This glorious example of our troops," he said, "under the like circumstances with ourselves, the General hopes, will animate every officer and soldier to imitate, and even to out-do them, when the enemy shall make the same attempt on us. With such a bright example before us of what can be done by brave men fighting in defence of their country, we shall be loaded with a double share of shame and infamy, if we do not acquit ourselves with courage, and manifest a determined resolution to conquer or die."

While preparations were underway for the expected battle, news came in about the British squadron being repelled after their attack on Fort Moultrie. The Commander-in-chief took this opportunity to share the success with his army, hoping to instill a spirit of competition alongside other reasons that would drive them to take bold action. "This glorious example of our troops," he said, "under similar circumstances as ours, the General hopes will inspire every officer and soldier to emulate, and even surpass them, when the enemy makes the same attempt on us. With such a shining example before us of what brave men can achieve while defending their country, we would be burdened with a double dose of shame and disgrace if we do not show courage and demonstrate a determined resolution to conquer or die."

As the crisis approached, his anxiety increased. Endeavouring to breathe into his army his own spirit, and to give them his own feeling, he thus addressed them. "The enemy's whole reinforcement is now arrived; so that an attack must, and will soon be made. The General, therefore, again repeats his earnest request that every officer and soldier will have his arms and ammunition in good order; keep within his quarters and encampments as far as possible; be ready for action at a moment's call; and when called to it, remember, that liberty, property, life, and honour, are all at stake; that upon their courage and conduct rest the hopes of their bleeding and insulted country; that their wives, children, and parents, expect safety from them only; and that we have every reason to believe, that heaven will crown with success so just a cause.

As the crisis drew near, his anxiety grew. Trying to instill his own spirit into his army and share his feelings with them, he addressed them this way: "The enemy's reinforcements have now arrived, so an attack is imminent and will happen soon. Therefore, I once again urge every officer and soldier to ensure their weapons and ammunition are in good condition; stay in your quarters and camps as much as possible; be ready for action at a moment’s notice; and when you are called to act, remember that your liberty, property, life, and honor are all at stake; that the hopes of our wounded and disrespected country depend on your bravery and actions; that your wives, children, and parents rely on you for their safety; and we have every reason to believe that heaven will reward such a just cause with success."

"The enemy will endeavour to intimidate by show and appearance; but remember, they have been repulsed on various occasions by a few brave Americans; their cause is bad; and if opposed with firmness and coolness on their first onset, with our advantage of works, and knowledge of the ground, the victory is most assuredly ours. Every good soldier will be silent and attentive, wait for orders, and reserve his fire until he is sure of doing execution; of this the officers are to be particularly careful."

"The enemy will try to intimidate with their display and presence; but remember, they have been driven back multiple times by a few brave Americans; their cause is weak; and if we stand firm and calm during their initial attack, with our advantage of defenses and familiarity with the terrain, victory is definitely ours. Every good soldier will stay silent and focused, wait for orders, and hold their fire until they are certain of hitting the target; officers need to be especially mindful of this."

He directed explicitly that any soldier who should attempt to conceal himself, or retreat without orders, should instantly be shot down; and solemnly promised to notice and reward those who should distinguish themselves. Thus did he, by infusing those sentiments which would stimulate to the greatest individual exertion, into every bosom, endeavour to compensate for the want of arms, of discipline, and of numbers.

He clearly stated that any soldier who tries to hide or retreat without orders would be shot on the spot; and he solemnly vowed to recognize and reward those who stood out. In this way, he aimed to inspire a sense of duty that would motivate each individual to put forth their best effort, compensating for the lack of weapons, training, and manpower.

As the defence of Long Island was intimately connected with that of New York, a brigade had been stationed at Brooklyn, a post capable of being maintained for a considerable time. An extensive camp had been marked out and fortified at the same place. Brooklyn is a village on a small peninsula made by East river, the Bay, and Gowan's Cove. The encampment fronted the main land of the island, and the works stretched quite across the peninsula, from Whaaleboght Bay in the East river on the left, to a deep marsh on a creek emptying into Gowan's Cove, on the right. The rear was covered and defended against an attack from the ships, by strong batteries on Red Hook and on Governor's Island, which in a great measure commanded that part of the bay, and by other batteries on East river, which kept open the communication with York Island. In front of the camp was a range of hills covered with thick woods, which extended from east to west nearly the length of the island, and across which were three different roads leading to Brooklyn ferry. These hills, though steep, are every where passable by infantry.

As the defense of Long Island was closely linked to that of New York, a brigade was stationed in Brooklyn, a location that could be held for a significant period. A large camp was set up and fortified in the same area. Brooklyn is a village on a small peninsula formed by the East River, the Bay, and Gowan's Cove. The encampment faced the mainland of the island, and the fortifications extended completely across the peninsula, from Whaaleboght Bay on the left in the East River to a deep marsh on a creek leading into Gowan's Cove on the right. The rear was protected from attacks by ships by strong batteries on Red Hook and Governor's Island, which largely controlled that part of the bay, as well as other batteries on the East River that maintained communication with York Island. In front of the camp was a series of hills covered with thick woods that stretched from east to west nearly the entire length of the island, with three different roads crossing them leading to Brooklyn ferry. These hills, although steep, were passable for infantry throughout.

The British land in force on Long Island.

The movements of General Howe indicating an intention to make his first attack on Long Island, General Sullivan was strongly reinforced. Early in the morning of the twenty-second, the principal part of the British army, under the command of General Clinton, landed under cover of the guns of the fleet, and extended from the ferry at the Narrows, through Utrecht and Gravesend, to the village of Flatland.[38]

The movements of General Howe suggested that he planned to launch his first attack on Long Island, prompting General Sullivan to receive strong reinforcements. Early on the morning of the twenty-second, the majority of the British army, led by General Clinton, landed with the protection of the fleet's guns and spread out from the ferry at the Narrows, through Utrecht and Gravesend, to the village of Flatland.[38]

July 23.

Confident that an engagement must soon take place, General Washington made still another effort to inspire his troops with the most determined courage. "The enemy," said he, in addressing them, "have now landed on Long Island, and the hour is fast approaching, on which the honour and success of this army, and the safety of our bleeding country depend. Remember, officers and soldiers, that you are freemen, fighting for the blessings of liberty—that slavery will be your portion and that of your posterity, if you do not acquit yourselves like men." He repeated his instructions respecting their conduct in action, and concluded with the most animating and encouraging exhortations.

Confident that a battle was imminent, General Washington made another effort to motivate his troops with unwavering courage. "The enemy," he said to them, "have now landed on Long Island, and the time is quickly approaching when the honor and success of this army, as well as the safety of our suffering country, depend on us. Remember, officers and soldiers, that you are free men fighting for the blessings of liberty—that slavery will be your fate and that of your descendants if you don't act like men." He reiterated his instructions regarding their behavior in battle and ended with the most inspiring and uplifting encouragement.

July 25.

Major General Putnam was now directed to take command at Brooklyn, with a reinforcement of six regiments; and he was charged most earnestly by the Commander-in-chief, to be in constant readiness for an attack, and to guard the woods between the two camps with his best troops.

Major General Putnam was now ordered to take command at Brooklyn, with a reinforcement of six regiments. The Commander-in-chief urged him strongly to always be ready for an attack and to protect the woods between the two camps with his best troops.

General Washington had passed the day at Brooklyn, making arrangements for the approaching action; and, at night, had returned to New York.

General Washington spent the day in Brooklyn, preparing for the upcoming battle, and returned to New York at night.

The Hessians under General De Heister composed the centre of the British army at Flatbush; Major General Grant commanded the left wing which extended to the coast, and the greater part of the British forces under General Clinton. Earl Percy and Lord Cornwallis turned short to the right, and approached the opposite coast of Flatland.[39]

The Hessians led by General De Heister were in the center of the British army at Flatbush. Major General Grant was in charge of the left wing that reached the coast, while most of the British forces were under General Clinton. Earl Percy and Lord Cornwallis quickly veered to the right and moved toward the opposite coast of Flatland.[39]

The two armies were now separated from each other by the range of hills already mentioned. The British centre at Flatbush was scarcely four miles distant from the American lines at Brooklyn; and a direct road led across the heights from the one to the other. Another road, rather more circuitous than the first, led from Flatbush by the way of Bedford, a small village on the Brooklyn side of the hills. The right and left wings of the British army were nearly equi-distant from the American works, and about five or six miles from them. The road leading from the Narrows along the coast, and by the way of Gowan's Cove, afforded the most direct route to their left; and their right might either return by the way of Flatbush and unite with the centre, or take a more circuitous course, and enter a road leading from Jamaica to Bedford. These several roads unite between Bedford and Brooklyn, a small distance in front of the American lines.

The two armies were now separated by the range of hills already mentioned. The British center at Flatbush was barely four miles away from the American lines at Brooklyn, and a direct road connected the two. Another route, which was a bit longer, went from Flatbush through Bedford, a small village on the Brooklyn side of the hills. The right and left flanks of the British army were nearly the same distance from the American positions, about five or six miles away. The road from the Narrows along the coast, via Gowan's Cove, provided the most direct path to their left. Their right could either go back through Flatbush to meet up with the center or take a longer route to join a road leading from Jamaica to Bedford. These various roads converge between Bedford and Brooklyn, a short distance in front of the American lines.

The direct road from Flatbush to Brooklyn was defended by a fort which the Americans had constructed in the hills; and the coast and Bedford roads were guarded by detachments posted on the hills within view of the British camp. Light parties of volunteers were directed to patrol on the road leading from Jamaica to Bedford; about two miles from which, near Flatbush, Colonel Miles of Pennsylvania was stationed with a regiment of riflemen. The convention of New York had ordered General Woodhull, with the militia of Long Island, to take post on the high grounds, as near the enemy as possible; but he remained at Jamaica, and seemed scarcely to suppose himself under the control of the regular officer commanding on the island.

The main road from Flatbush to Brooklyn was protected by a fort that the Americans built in the hills, and the coast and Bedford roads were monitored by detachments stationed on the hills overlooking the British camp. Small groups of volunteers were assigned to patrol the road from Jamaica to Bedford; about two miles from there, near Flatbush, Colonel Miles of Pennsylvania was positioned with a regiment of riflemen. The New York convention had ordered General Woodhull, along with the Long Island militia, to occupy the high ground as close to the enemy as possible; however, he stayed in Jamaica and seemed to believe he wasn't really under the authority of the regular officer in charge on the island.

July 27.

About nine at night, General Clinton silently drew off the van of the British army across the country, in order to seize a pass in the heights, about three miles east of Bedford, on the Jamaica road. In the morning, about two hours before day-break, within half a mile of the pass, his patrols fell in with and captured one of the American parties, which had been stationed on this road. Learning from his prisoners that the pass was unoccupied, General Clinton immediately seized it; and, on the appearance of day, the whole column passed the heights, and advanced into the level country between them and Brooklyn.[40]

About nine at night, General Clinton quietly withdrew his part of the British army across the countryside to take control of a pass in the hills, about three miles east of Bedford, on the Jamaica road. In the morning, about two hours before dawn, his patrols encountered and captured one of the American groups stationed on this road. After learning from his prisoners that the pass was unguarded, General Clinton quickly took it; and when day broke, the entire column moved past the heights and into the flat land between them and Brooklyn.[40]

Before Clinton had secured the passes on the road from Jamaica, General Grant advanced along the coast at the head of the left wing, with ten pieces of cannon. As his first object was to draw the attention of the Americans from their left, he moved slowly, skirmishing as he advanced with the light parties stationed on that road.[41]

Before Clinton had secured the roads from Jamaica, General Grant moved along the coast leading the left wing with ten cannons. His main goal was to distract the Americans from their left side, so he proceeded slowly, engaging in skirmishes as he advanced with the small groups stationed on that road.[41]

This movement was soon communicated to General Putnam, who reinforced the parties which had been advanced in front; and, as General Grant continued to gain ground, still stronger detachments were employed in this service. About three in the morning, Brigadier General Lord Stirling was directed to meet the enemy, with the two nearest regiments, on the road leading from the Narrows. Major General Sullivan, who commanded all the troops without the lines, advanced at the head of a strong detachment on the road leading directly to Flatbush; while another detachment occupied the heights between that place and Bedford.

This movement was quickly communicated to General Putnam, who reinforced the groups that had been sent ahead; and as General Grant kept making progress, even larger detachments were deployed for this task. Around three in the morning, Brigadier General Lord Stirling was ordered to confront the enemy with the two closest regiments on the road leading from the Narrows. Major General Sullivan, who led all the troops outside the lines, advanced at the front of a strong detachment on the road directly to Flatbush, while another group took control of the heights between that location and Bedford.

About the break of day, Lord Stirling reached the summit of the hills, where he was joined by the troops which had been already engaged, and were retiring slowly before the enemy, who almost immediately appeared in sight. A warm cannonade was commenced on both sides, which continued for several hours; and some sharp, but not very close skirmishing took place between the infantry. Lord Stirling, being anxious only to defend the pass he guarded, could not descend in force from the heights; and General Grant did not wish to drive him from them until that part of the plan, which had been entrusted to Sir Henry Clinton, should be executed.

At dawn, Lord Stirling reached the top of the hills, where he was joined by the troops that had already fought and were slowly retreating from the enemy, who quickly came into view. A heavy cannon fire started from both sides and went on for several hours, with some intense but not very close skirmishes occurring between the infantry. Lord Stirling, focused solely on defending the pass he was protecting, couldn't come down forcefully from the heights; and General Grant didn't want to push him off until the part of the plan given to Sir Henry Clinton was carried out.

Battle of Brooklyn and evacuation of Long Island.

In the centre, General De Heister, soon after day-light, began to cannonade the troops under General Sullivan; but did not move from his ground at Flatbush, until the British right had approached the left and rear of the American line. In the mean time, in order the more effectually to draw their attention from the point where the grand attack was intended, the fleet was put in motion, and a heavy cannonade was commenced on the battery at Red Hook.

In the center, General De Heister, shortly after dawn, started firing at the troops led by General Sullivan; however, he didn’t leave his position at Flatbush until the British right had moved closer to the left and rear of the American line. Meanwhile, to better divert their attention from the area of the main attack, the fleet was set in motion, and heavy artillery fire began on the battery at Red Hook.

About half past eight, the British right having then reached Bedford, in the rear of Sullivan's left, General De Heister ordered Colonel Donop's corps to advance to the attack of the hill; following, himself, with the centre of the army. The approach of Clinton was now discovered by the American left, which immediately endeavoured to regain the camp at Brooklyn. While retiring from the woods by regiments, they encountered the front of the British. About the same time, the Hessians advanced from Flatbush, against that part of the detachment which occupied the direct road to Brooklyn.[42] Here, General Sullivan commanded in person; but he found it difficult to keep his troops together long enough to sustain the first attack. The firing heard towards Bedford had disclosed the alarming fact that the British had turned their left flank, and were getting completely into their rear. Perceiving at once the full danger of their situation, they sought to escape it by regaining the camp with the utmost possible celerity. The sudden rout of this party enabled De Heister to detach a part of his force against those who were engaged near Bedford. In that quarter, too, the Americans were broken, and driven back into the woods; and the front of the column led by General Clinton, continuing to move forward, intercepted and engaged those who were retreating along the direct road from Flatbush. Thus attacked both in front and rear, and alternately driven by the British on the Hessians, and by the Hessians back again on the British, a succession of skirmishes took place in the woods, in the course of which, some parts of corps forced their way through the enemy, and regained the lines of Brooklyn, and several individuals saved themselves under cover of the woods; but a great proportion of the detachment was killed or taken. The fugitives were pursued up to the American works; and such is represented to have been the ardour of the British soldiers, that it required the authority of their cautious commander to prevent an immediate assault.

Around 8:30, with the British right having reached Bedford, behind Sullivan's left, General De Heister ordered Colonel Donop's corps to launch an attack on the hill, following closely behind with the center of the army. The American left soon realized Clinton was approaching and immediately tried to return to the camp at Brooklyn. While retreating from the woods in regiments, they ran into the front of the British. At the same time, the Hessians moved from Flatbush against the part of the detachment that was on the direct road to Brooklyn.[42] Here, General Sullivan was in charge personally, but he struggled to keep his troops together long enough to withstand the initial attack. The gunfire heard toward Bedford revealed the alarming fact that the British had flanked their left and were getting behind them. Understanding the full extent of their danger, they tried to escape by quickly moving back to the camp. The sudden retreat of this group allowed De Heister to send part of his force against those near Bedford. In that area, the Americans were also broken and pushed back into the woods, while the leading column under General Clinton continued to advance, intercepting and engaging those retreating directly from Flatbush. Thus attacked from both the front and rear, alternately pressured by the British and pushed back by the Hessians, a series of skirmishes erupted in the woods, during which some parts of the corps managed to break through the enemy lines and return to the Brooklyn positions, while several individuals found cover in the woods; however, a large portion of the detachment was killed or captured. The fleeing soldiers were pursued up to the American defenses, and it is said that the British soldiers were so fired up that it took the cautious commander's authority to prevent an immediate assault.

The fire towards Brooklyn gave the first intimation to the American right, that the enemy had gained their rear. Lord Stirling perceived the danger, and that he could only escape it by retreating instantly across the creek. This movement was immediately directed; and, to secure it, his lordship determined to attack, in person, a British corps under Lord Cornwallis, stationed at a house rather above the place at which he intended to cross the creek. About four hundred men of Smallwood's regiment were drawn out for this purpose, and the attack was made with great spirit. This small corps was brought up several times to the charge; and Lord Stirling stated that he was on the point of dislodging Lord Cornwallis from his post; but the force in his front increasing, and General Grant also advancing on his rear, the brave men he commanded were no longer able to oppose the superior numbers which assailed them on every quarter; and those who survived were, with their General, made prisoners of war. This attempt, though unsuccessful, gave an opportunity to a large part of the detachment to save themselves by crossing the creek.

The fire towards Brooklyn was the first sign for the American right that the enemy had gotten behind them. Lord Stirling recognized the danger and knew he could only escape by retreating immediately across the creek. He quickly ordered this movement, and to ensure it went smoothly, he decided to personally attack a British group led by Lord Cornwallis, positioned at a house slightly above where he planned to cross the creek. About four hundred men from Smallwood's regiment were assembled for this purpose, and they launched the attack with great energy. This small force charged several times, and Lord Stirling claimed he was about to drive Lord Cornwallis from his position; however, as the enemy reinforcements grew stronger and General Grant advanced from behind, the brave men under his command could no longer hold out against the overwhelming numbers attacking from all sides. Those who survived, along with their General, were taken prisoner. Although this attempt failed, it allowed a large part of the detachment to escape by crossing the creek.

The loss sustained by the American army in this battle could not be accurately ascertained by either party. Numbers were supposed to have been drowned in the creek, or suffocated in the marsh, whose bodies were never found; and exact accounts from the militia are seldom to be obtained, as the list of the missing is always swelled by those who return to their homes. General Washington did not admit it to exceed a thousand men; but in this estimate he must have included only the regular troops. In the letter written by General Howe, the amount of prisoners is stated at one thousand and ninety-seven; among whom were Major General Sullivan, and Brigadiers Lord Stirling and Woodhull, by him named Udell. He computes the loss of the Americans at three thousand three hundred men; but his computation is probably excessive. He supposes, too, that the troops engaged on the heights, amounted to ten thousand; but they could not have much exceeded half that number. His own loss is stated at twenty-one officers, and three hundred and forty-six privates; killed, wounded, and taken.

The loss experienced by the American army in this battle couldn't be accurately determined by either side. It was believed that some were drowned in the creek or suffocated in the marsh, and their bodies were never found; plus, getting clear accounts from the militia is rare, as the list of missing individuals is always inflated by those who go back home. General Washington estimated the losses at no more than a thousand men, but this likely only accounted for the regular troops. In a letter from General Howe, the number of prisoners is listed as one thousand ninety-seven, which included Major General Sullivan and Brigadiers Lord Stirling and Woodhull, whom he referred to as Udell. He calculated the American loss at three thousand three hundred men, but that figure is probably too high. He also estimated that the troops involved on the heights numbered about ten thousand, but they likely didn't exceed half that amount. His own losses were reported as twenty-one officers and three hundred forty-six privates, killed, wounded, or captured.

As the action became warm, General Washington passed over to the camp at Brooklyn, where he saw, with inexpressible anguish, the destruction in which his best troops were involved, and from which it was impossible to extricate them. Should he attempt any thing in their favour with the men remaining within the lines, it was probable the camp itself would be lost, and that whole division of his army destroyed. Should he bring over the remaining battalions from New York, he would still be inferior in point of numbers; and his whole army, perhaps the fate of his country, might be staked on the issue of a single battle thus inauspiciously commenced. Compelled to behold the carnage of his troops, without being able to assist them, his efforts were directed to the preservation of those which remained.

As the action heated up, General Washington moved over to the camp at Brooklyn, where he watched in deep anguish as his best troops faced destruction and could not be rescued. If he tried to do anything to help them with the men still inside the lines, it was likely that the camp itself would be lost, and that entire division of his army would be wiped out. Even if he brought over the remaining battalions from New York, he would still be outnumbered; his entire army—and perhaps the fate of his country—was at risk depending on the outcome of a battle that had started so poorly. Forced to watch his troops suffer without being able to help them, he focused on protecting the ones that were left.

July 28.

Believing the Americans to be much stronger than they were in reality, and unwilling to commit any thing to hazard, General Howe made no immediate attempt to force their lines. He encamped in front of them; and, on the twenty-eighth at night, broke ground in form, within six hundred yards of a redoubt on the left.

Believing the Americans to be much stronger than they actually were, and not wanting to take any risks, General Howe didn’t make an immediate effort to break through their lines. He set up camp in front of them, and on the night of the twenty-eighth, he started digging in a formal way, within six hundred yards of a fort on the left.

July 29.

In this critical state of things, General Washington determined to withdraw from Long Island. This difficult movement was effected on the night of the twenty-eighth, with such silence, that all the troops and military stores, with the greater part of the provisions, and all the artillery, except such heavy pieces as could not be drawn through the roads, rendered almost impassable by the rains which had fallen, were carried over in safety. Early next morning, the British out-posts perceived the rear guard crossing the East river, out of reach of their fire.

In this critical situation, General Washington decided to pull back from Long Island. This challenging maneuver was carried out on the night of the twenty-eighth so quietly that all the troops, military supplies, most of the food, and all the artillery, except for the heavy pieces that couldn't be moved through the roads made nearly impassable by the recent rains, were safely transported. Early the next morning, the British outposts noticed the rear guard crossing the East River, out of range of their fire.

From the commencement of the action on the morning of the twenty-seventh, until the American troops had crossed the East river on the morning of the twenty-ninth, the exertions and fatigues of the Commander-in-chief were incessant. Throughout that time, he never closed his eyes, and was almost constantly on horseback.

From the start of the action on the morning of the twenty-seventh until the American troops crossed the East River on the morning of the twenty-ninth, the efforts and exhaustion of the Commander-in-chief were unrelenting. During that time, he didn’t sleep at all and was almost always on horseback.

The manner in which this critical operation was executed, and the circumstances under which it was performed, added greatly to the reputation of the American general, in the opinion of all military men. To withdraw, without loss, a defeated, dispirited, and undisciplined army from the view of an experienced and able officer, and to transport them in safety across a large river, while watched by a numerous and vigilant fleet, require talents of no ordinary kind; and the retreat from Long Island may justly be ranked among those skilful manoeuvres which distinguish a master in the art of war.

The way this critical operation was carried out and the circumstances surrounding it greatly enhanced the reputation of the American general, in the eyes of all military professionals. To successfully withdraw a defeated, demoralized, and undisciplined army from sight of a seasoned and capable officer, and to safely transport them across a large river while being monitored by a large and watchful fleet, requires extraordinary skills; and the retreat from Long Island can rightly be considered one of those skillful maneuvers that set apart a master in the art of warfare.

The attempt to defend Long Island was so perilous in itself, and so disastrous in its issue, that it was condemned by many at the time, and is yet represented as a great error of the Commander-in-chief. But, in deciding on the wisdom of measures, the event will not always lead to a correct judgment. Before a just opinion can be formed, it is necessary to consider the previous state of things—to weigh the motives which induced the decision—and to compare the value of the object, and the probability of securing it, with the hazards attending the attempt.

The attempt to defend Long Island was incredibly risky and ended in disaster, leading many people at the time to criticize it, and it’s still seen as a major mistake by the Commander-in-chief. However, when judging the wisdom of decisions, the outcome doesn’t always help in making the right judgment. To form a fair opinion, it’s important to look at the situation beforehand, to weigh the reasons behind the decision, and to compare the importance of the goal and the likelihood of achieving it with the dangers involved in trying.

It was very desirable to preserve New York, if practicable; or, if that could not be done, to consume the campaign in the struggle for that place. The abandonment of Long Island, besides giving the enemy secure and immediate possession of an extensive and fertile country, would certainly facilitate the success of his attempt upon New York. It was therefore to be avoided, if possible.

It was really important to hold onto New York, if it was doable; or, if not, to make the campaign all about fighting for that city. Giving up Long Island would not only give the enemy safe and immediate access to a large and fertile area but would also definitely make it easier for them to attack New York. So, it was something to avoid if we could.

The impossibility of avoiding it was not evident until the battle was fought. It is true, that the American force on the island could not have been rendered equal, even in point of numbers, to that of the British; but, with the advantage of the defencible country through which the assailants were to pass, and of a fortified camp which could be attacked only on one side, hopes might be entertained, without the imputation of being oversanguine, of maintaining the position for a considerable time; and, ultimately, of selling it at a high price. This opinion is supported by the subsequent movements of General Howe, who, even after the victory of the twenty-seventh, was unwilling to hazard an assault on the American works, without the co-operation of the fleet; but chose rather to carry them by regular approaches. Nor would the situation of the troops on Long Island have been desperate, even in the event of a conjoint attack by land and water, before their strength and spirits were broken by the action of the twenty-seventh. The East river was guarded by strong batteries on both sides, and the entrance into it from the bay was defended by Governor's Island, which was fortified, and in which two regiments were stationed. The ships could not lie in that river, without first silencing those batteries—a work not easily accomplished. The aid of the fleet, therefore, could be given only at the point of time when a storm of the works should be intended; and when that should appear practicable, the troops might be withdrawn from the island.

The impossibility of avoiding it didn't become clear until after the battle was fought. It's true that the American forces on the island were outnumbered by the British; however, with the advantages of the defensible terrain they had to navigate and a fortified camp that could only be attacked from one side, there was reason to hope—without being overly optimistic—that they could hold their position for a significant amount of time and eventually trade it for a favorable outcome. This belief is backed up by General Howe's later actions, as he was hesitant to risk an assault on the American fortifications even after his victory on the 27th, preferring instead to take a more measured approach. Additionally, the situation for the troops on Long Island wouldn’t have been dire, even if there had been a combined attack by land and sea, before their strength and morale were weakened by the conflict on the 27th. The East River was protected by strong fortifications on both sides, and the entrance from the bay was secured by Governor's Island, which was fortified and had two regiments stationed there. The ships couldn't navigate that river without first neutralizing those fortifications—a task that wasn't easily done. Thus, the fleet could only assist at the moment when an attack on the fortifications was planned; and if that seemed feasible, the troops could be withdrawn from the island.

There was then considerable hazard in maintaining Long Island; but not so much as to demonstrate the propriety of relinquishing a post of such great importance, without a struggle.

There was a significant risk in keeping Long Island; however, it wasn't enough to justify giving up such an important position without a fight.

With more appearance of reason, the General has been condemned for not having guarded the road which leads over the hills from Jamaica to Bedford.

With a stronger sense of reason, the General has been criticized for not securing the road that goes over the hills from Jamaica to Bedford.

The written instructions given to the officer commanding on Long Island, two days previous to the action, directed that the woods should be well guarded, and the approach of the enemy through them rendered as difficult as possible. But his numbers were not sufficient to furnish detachments for all the defiles through the mountains; and if a corps, capable of making an effectual resistance, had been posted on this road, and a feint had been made on it, while the principal attack was by the direct road from Flatbush, or by that along the coast, the events of the day would probably have been not less disastrous. The columns marching directly from Flatbush must, on every reasonable calculation, have been in possession of the plain in the rear of the detachment posted on the road from Jamaica, so as to intercept its retreat to the camp. So great is the advantage of those who attack, in being able to choose the point against which to direct their grand effort.

The written instructions given to the officer in charge on Long Island two days before the battle directed that the woods should be well guarded, making it as hard as possible for the enemy to come through. However, he didn’t have enough troops to cover all the paths through the mountains. If a reliable force had been stationed on this road and a distraction had been created there while the main attack came from the direct route from Flatbush or along the coast, the outcome of the day might have been just as disastrous. The columns marching straight from Flatbush would likely have taken the open area behind the detachment on the road from Jamaica, cutting off its retreat to the camp. The advantage always lies with those who attack, as they can choose where to focus their main effort.

The most adviseable plan, then, appears to have been, to watch the motions of the enemy so as to be master of his designs; to oppose with a competent force every attempt to seize the heights; and to guard all the passes in such a manner as to receive notice of his approach through any one of them, in sufficient time to recall the troops maintaining the others.

The best approach seems to be to keep an eye on the enemy's movements to understand their plans; to counter any attempts to take the high ground with enough force; and to secure all the passes in a way that we can be alerted of their approach through any of them in time to pull back the troops manning the others.

This plan was adopted—and the heavy disasters of the day are attributable, principally, to the failure of those charged with the execution of that very important part of it which related to the Jamaica road. The letter of General Howe states that an American patrolling party was taken on this road; and General Washington, in a private and confidential communication to a friend, says, "This misfortune happened, in a great measure, by two detachments of our people who were posted in two roads leading through a wood, to intercept the enemy in their march, suffering a surprise, and making a precipitate retreat."

This plan was put into action—and the significant disasters of the day are mainly due to the failure of those responsible for carrying out the crucial part of it concerning the Jamaica road. General Howe's letter mentions that an American patrol was caught on this road; and General Washington, in a private and confidential message to a friend, says, "This misfortune happened largely because two groups from our side were stationed on two roads going through a wooded area to intercept the enemy as they marched, but they were surprised and had to retreat quickly."

The events of this day, too, exhibited a practical demonstration of a radical defect in the structure of the army. It did not contain a single corps of cavalry. That miscalculating economy which refuses the means essential to the end, was not sufficiently relaxed to admit of so expensive an establishment. Had the General been furnished with a few troops of light-horse, to serve merely as videts, it is probable that the movement so decisive of the fate of the day could not have been made unnoticed. The troops on the lines do not appear to have observed the column which was withdrawn, on the evening of the twenty-sixth, from Flatbush to Flatland. Had this important manoeuvre been communicated, it would, most probably, have turned the attention of General Putnam, more particularly, to the Jamaica road. It is to the want of videts, that a failure to obtain this important intelligence is to be ascribed. The necessity of changing the officer originally intrusted with the command, was also an unfortunate circumstance, which probably contributed to the event which happened.

The events of this day also showed a clear flaw in the army's structure. It lacked any cavalry units. That short-sighted approach to saving money, which ignores the essentials needed for success, was still too strict to allow for such an expensive force. If the General had been given a few light cavalry troops, just to act as scouts, it’s likely that the significant movement that determined the day's outcome would not have gone unnoticed. The troops on the lines apparently didn’t see the column that was pulled back on the evening of the twenty-sixth from Flatbush to Flatland. If this crucial maneuver had been reported, it would probably have drawn General Putnam's attention more towards the Jamaica road. The lack of scouts is what led to missing this vital information. Additionally, the need to replace the officer initially in charge was also an unfortunate factor that likely contributed to what happened.

Whatever causes might have led to this defeat, it gave a gloomy aspect to the affairs of America. Heretofore, her arms had been frequently successful, and her soldiers had always manifested a great degree of intrepidity. A confidence in themselves, a persuasion of superiority over the enemy, arising from the goodness of their cause, and their early and habitual use of fire arms, had been carefully encouraged. This sentiment had been nourished by all their experience preceding this event. When they found themselves, by a course of evolutions in which they imagined they perceived a great superiority of military skill, encircled with unexpected dangers, from which no exertions could extricate them, their confidence in themselves and in their leaders was greatly diminished, and the approach of the enemy inspired the apprehension that some stratagem was concealed, from which immediate flight alone could preserve them.

Whatever causes may have led to this defeat, it cast a shadow over America’s situation. Until now, her military had often been successful, and her soldiers had always shown great bravery. Confidence in themselves, a belief in their superiority over the enemy, stemming from their just cause and their early and regular use of firearms, had been carefully nurtured. This feeling had been built up by all their experiences leading up to this event. When they found themselves, through a series of maneuvers that they thought demonstrated superior military skill, surrounded by unexpected dangers from which they could not escape, their confidence in themselves and their leaders was greatly shaken, and the enemy's approach sparked fears that some hidden strategy was afoot, leaving immediate flight as their only means of safety.

September 2.

In a letter from General Washington to congress, the state of the army after this event was thus feelingly described: "Our situation is truly distressing. The check our detachment sustained on the 27th ultimo, has dispirited too great a proportion of our troops, and filled their minds with apprehension and despair. The militia, instead of calling forth their utmost efforts to a brave and manly opposition, in order to repair our losses, are dismayed, intractable, and impatient to return. Great numbers of them have gone off; in some instances, almost by whole regiments; in many, by half ones and by companies, at a time. This circumstance, of itself, independent of others, when fronted by a well appointed enemy, superior in number to our whole collected force, would be sufficiently disagreeable; but when it is added, that their example has infected another part of the army; that their want of discipline, and refusal of almost every kind of restraint and government, have rendered a like conduct but too common in the whole; and have produced an entire disregard of that order and subordination necessary for the well doing of an army, and which had been before inculcated as well as the nature of our military establishment would admit of; our condition is still more alarming, and with the deepest concern I am obliged to confess my want of confidence in the generality of the troops.

In a letter from General Washington to Congress, the state of the army after this event was described with great feeling: "Our situation is truly distressing. The setback our detachment faced on the 27th of last month has demoralized too many of our troops and filled their minds with fear and despair. The militia, instead of putting in their best efforts for a brave and manly fight to make up for our losses, are discouraged, unmanageable, and eager to leave. A large number of them have already left; in some cases, almost entire regiments, and in many instances, half of them and smaller groups, all at once. This situation, on its own, is bad enough, especially when faced with a well-equipped enemy who outnumbers our entire assembled force. But it gets worse when we consider that their behavior has influenced the rest of the army; that their lack of discipline and refusal to follow any kind of restraint or authority has made such behavior too common across the board; and that it has led to a complete disregard for the order and hierarchy necessary for a well-functioning army, which had previously been emphasized as much as our military structure would allow. Our situation is even more concerning, and I deeply regret to admit my lack of confidence in the majority of the troops."

"All these circumstances fully confirm the opinion I ever entertained, and which I, more than once, in my letters, took the liberty of mentioning to congress, that no dependence could be placed in a militia, or other troops than those enlisted and embodied for a longer period than our regulations have hitherto prescribed. I am persuaded, and am as fully convinced as of any one fact that has happened, that our liberties must, of necessity, be greatly hazarded, if not entirely lost, if their defence be left to any but a permanent army."

"All these circumstances completely support the view I’ve always held, and which I’ve mentioned to Congress more than once in my letters, that we can't rely on a militia or any other troops except those who are enlisted and active for longer than our current regulations allow. I am convinced, just as surely as I am about any other fact, that our freedoms will be seriously at risk, if not completely lost, if their defense is left to anyone but a standing army."

Fruitless negotiations.

The first use made by Lord Howe of the victory of the 27th of August, was to avail himself of the impression it had probably made on congress, by opening a negotiation in conformity with his powers as a commissioner. For this purpose, General Sullivan was sent on parole to Philadelphia, with a verbal message, the import of which was, "that though he could not at present treat with congress as a political body, yet he was very desirous of having a conference with some of its members, whom he would consider, for the present, only as private gentlemen, and meet them as such at any place they would appoint.

The first thing Lord Howe did after the victory on August 27th was to take advantage of the impact it likely had on Congress by starting a negotiation in line with his powers as a commissioner. To facilitate this, General Sullivan was sent on parole to Philadelphia with a verbal message meaning that, although he couldn’t currently negotiate with Congress as a political body, he was very eager to have a discussion with some of its members, whom he would regard, for now, only as private individuals, and would meet them as such at any location they chose.

"That, in conjunction with General Howe, he had full powers to compromise the dispute between Great Britain and America, on terms advantageous to both; the obtaining of which detained him near two months in England, and prevented his arrival in New York before the declaration of independence took place.

"That, along with General Howe, he had full authority to resolve the conflict between Great Britain and America, on terms that would benefit both sides; securing this took him almost two months in England, which delayed his arrival in New York until after the declaration of independence."

"That he wished a compact might be settled at this time, when no decisive blow was struck, and neither party could allege being compelled to enter into such agreement.

"That he wanted to finalize an agreement at this moment, when no significant action had been taken, and neither side could claim they were forced to enter into such an agreement."

"That in case congress were disposed to treat, many things which they had not as yet asked, might, and ought to be granted them; and that if, upon the conference, they found any probable ground of an accommodation, the authority of congress must be afterwards acknowledged—otherwise the compact would not be complete."

"That if Congress was open to negotiations, there were many things they hadn't yet requested that could and should be granted; and that if, during the discussions, they found any reasonable basis for a compromise, Congress's authority would need to be recognized afterwards—otherwise the agreement wouldn't be complete."

This proposition was not without its embarrassments. Its rejection would give some countenance to the opinion, that, if independence were waved, a restoration of the ancient connexion between the two countries, on principles formerly deemed constitutional, was still practicable; an opinion which would have an unfavourable effect on the public sentiment. On the other hand, to enter into a negotiation under such circumstances, might excite a suspicion, that their determination to maintain the independence they had declared, was not immoveable; and that things were in such a situation, as to admit of some relaxation in the measures necessary for the defence of the country.

This proposal came with its challenges. Rejecting it could support the belief that if independence were set aside, restoring the old connection between the two countries—on principles once thought to be constitutional—was still possible. This belief could negatively impact public opinion. Conversely, entering negotiations under these conditions might raise doubts about their commitment to the independence they had declared and suggest that the situation was such that they could ease up on the necessary defensive measures for the country.

The answer given to Lord Howe, through General Sullivan, was, "that congress, being the representatives of the free and independent States of America, can not, with propriety, send any of its members to confer with his Lordship in their private characters; but that, ever desirous of establishing peace on reasonable terms, they will send a committee of their body to know whether he has any authority to treat with persons authorized by congress for that purpose, on behalf of America; and what that authority is;—and to hear such propositions as he shall think proper to make, respecting the same."

The response given to Lord Howe, through General Sullivan, was, "Congress, representing the free and independent states of America, cannot properly send any of its members to meet with his Lordship in their personal capacities; however, always wanting to establish peace on reasonable terms, they will send a committee from their group to find out if he has any authority to negotiate with people authorized by Congress for that purpose, on behalf of America; and what that authority is;—and to hear any proposals he wishes to make regarding the same."

The President was, at the same time, directed to communicate to General Washington the opinion of congress, that no propositions for making peace "ought to be received or attended to, unless the same be made in writing, and addressed to the representatives of the United States in congress, or persons authorized by them: And if applications on that subject be made to him by any of the commanders of the British forces, that he inform them, that these United States, who entered into the war only for the defence of their lives and liberties, will cheerfully agree to peace on reasonable terms, whenever such shall be proposed to them in manner aforesaid."

The President was also instructed to inform General Washington of Congress's view that no peace proposals "should be considered or acknowledged unless they are in writing and addressed to the representatives of the United States in Congress, or individuals authorized by them. If any commanders of the British forces approach him on this issue, he should let them know that these United States, which entered the war solely to defend their lives and freedoms, will happily agree to peace on reasonable terms whenever such terms are offered in the manner stated."

It is worthy of remark, that, in these resolutions, congress preserves the appearance of insisting on the independence of the United States, without declaring it to be the indispensable condition of peace.

It’s worth noting that, in these resolutions, Congress maintains the appearance of insisting on the independence of the United States without declaring it to be the essential condition for peace.

Mr. Franklin, Mr. John Adams, and Mr. Edward Rutledge, all zealous supporters of independence, were appointed "to receive the communications of Lord Howe."

Mr. Franklin, Mr. John Adams, and Mr. Edward Rutledge, all passionate supporters of independence, were chosen "to receive the communications of Lord Howe."

They waited on his Lordship; and, on their return, reported, that he had received them on the 11th of September, on Staten Island, opposite to Amboy, with great politeness.

They waited on his Lordship; and, on their return, reported that he had received them on September 11th, on Staten Island, across from Amboy, with great politeness.

He opened the conversation by acquainting them, that though he could not treat with them as a committee of congress, yet, as his powers enabled him to confer and consult with any private gentlemen of influence in the colonies, on the means of restoring peace between the two countries, he was glad of this opportunity of conferring with them on that subject; if they thought themselves at liberty to enter into a conference with him in that character. The committee observed to his Lordship, that, as their business was to hear, he might consider them in what light he pleased, and communicate to them any propositions he might be authorized to make for the purpose mentioned; but that they could consider themselves in no other character than that in which they were placed by order of congress. His Lordship then proceeded to open his views at some length. He offered peace only on the condition that the colonies should return to their allegiance and obedience to the British crown. He made no explicit propositions as inducements to this measure, but gave assurances that there was a good disposition in the king and his ministers to make the government easy to them, with intimations that, in case of submission, the offensive acts of parliament would be revised, and the instructions to the Governors reconsidered; so that, if any just causes of complaint were found in the acts, or any errors in government were found to have crept into the instructions, they might be amended or withdrawn.

He started the conversation by informing them that, although he couldn’t negotiate with them as a committee of Congress, he was pleased to have the chance to discuss the best ways to restore peace between the two countries, as his role allowed him to meet and consult with influential individuals in the colonies. He asked if they were open to talking with him in that capacity. The committee replied to his Lordship that, since their purpose was to listen, he could view them however he wished and share any proposals he was permitted to make regarding that issue. However, they could only see themselves in the role assigned to them by Congress. His Lordship then elaborated on his views. He offered peace only if the colonies would pledge their allegiance and obedience to the British crown again. He didn’t provide specific proposals as incentives but assured them that the king and his ministers were inclined to make the government more accommodating and hinted that if they submitted, the problematic acts of Parliament would be reviewed, and the instructions to the Governors would be reconsidered. This way, if there were any legitimate grievances in the acts or mistakes in governance in the instructions, those could be corrected or retracted.

The committee gave it as their opinion to his Lordship, that a return to the domination of Great Britain was not now to be expected. They mentioned the repeated humble petitions of the colonies to the king and parliament, which had been treated with contempt, and answered only by additional injuries; the unexampled patience which had been shown under their tyrannical government; and that it was not until the late act of parliament, which denounced war against them, and put them out of the king's protection, that they declared their independence; that this declaration had been called for by the people of the colonies in general, and that every colony had approved it when made,—and all now considered themselves as independent states, and were settling, or had settled, their governments accordingly; so that it was not in the power of congress to agree for them that they should return to their former dependent state; that there was no doubt of their inclination for peace, and their willingness to enter into a treaty with Britain, that might be advantageous to both countries; that though his Lordship had, at present, no power to treat with them as independent states, he might, if there was the same good disposition in Britain, much sooner obtain fresh powers from his government, for that purpose, than powers could be obtained by congress, from the several colonies, to consent to a submission.

The committee expressed to his Lordship that a return to British rule was no longer realistic. They pointed out the repeated humble petitions from the colonies to the king and parliament, which had been ignored and met with further injustices; the remarkable patience displayed under their oppressive government; and how it was only after the recent act of parliament, which declared war against them and removed them from the king's protection, that they declared their independence. This declaration had been demanded by the general populace of the colonies, and every colony had supported it at the time—now, they all saw themselves as independent states and were establishing their own governments accordingly. Therefore, congress had no authority to negotiate a return to their former dependent status. There was no doubt about their desire for peace and willingness to negotiate a treaty with Britain that could benefit both nations. Although his Lordship currently lacked the power to negotiate with them as independent states, he could, if Britain shared the same goodwill, obtain new powers from his government for that purpose much quicker than congress could secure permission from the various colonies to agree to a return to subjugation.

His Lordship then expressed his regret that no accommodation was like to take place, and put an end to the conference.

His Lordship then expressed his regret that no agreement was likely to happen and ended the conference.

These fruitless negotiations produced no suspension of hostilities.

These unproductive negotiations did not lead to a ceasefire.

The British army, now in full possession of Long Island, was posted from Bedford to Hurlgate; and thus fronted and threatened York Island from its extreme southern point, to the part opposite the northern boundary of Long Island, a small distance below the heights of Haerlem; comprehending a space of about nine miles.

The British army, now fully in control of Long Island, was stationed from Bedford to Hurlgate; they faced and threatened York Island from its southern tip to the area across from the northern edge of Long Island, a short distance below the heights of Harlem; covering a stretch of about nine miles.

The two armies were divided only by the East river, which is generally less than a mile wide.

The two armies were separated only by the East River, which is usually less than a mile wide.

September 4.

Immediately after the victory at Brooklyn, dispositions were made by the enemy to attack New York, and a part of the fleet sailed round Long Island, and appeared in the Sound. Two frigates passed up the East river, without receiving any injury from the batteries, and anchored behind a small island which protected them from the American artillery. At the same time, the main body of the fleet lay at anchor close in with Governor's Island, from which the American troops had been withdrawn, ready to pass up either the North or East river, or both, and act against any part of York Island.

Immediately after the victory at Brooklyn, the enemy began preparing to attack New York. Part of their fleet sailed around Long Island and appeared in the Sound. Two frigates went up the East River without getting hit by the batteries and anchored behind a small island that shielded them from the American artillery. Meanwhile, the main part of the fleet anchored close to Governor's Island, from which the American troops had been pulled back, ready to move up either the North or East River, or both, and launch an attack on any part of York Island.

These movements indicated a disposition, not to make an attack directly on New York, as had been expected, but to land near Kingsbridge, and take a position which would cut off the communication of the American army with the country.

These movements showed an intention, not to directly attack New York as expected, but to land near Kingsbridge and take a position that would sever the American army's communication with the rest of the country.

Aware of the danger of his situation, General Washington began to remove such stores as were not immediately necessary; and called a council of general officers for the purpose of deciding, whether New York should be evacuated without delay, or longer defended.

Aware of the danger of his situation, General Washington began to remove any supplies that were not immediately necessary; and called a council of general officers to decide whether New York should be evacuated right away or defended longer.

In his letter communicating to congress the result of this council, which was against an immediate evacuation, he manifested a conviction of the necessity of that measure, though he yielded to that necessity with reluctance. Speaking of the enemy, he observed, "It is now extremely obvious from their movements, from our intelligence, and from every other circumstance, that, having their whole army upon Long Island, except about four thousand men who remain on Staten Island, they mean to enclose us in this island, by taking post in our rear, while their ships effectually secure the front; and thus, by cutting off our communication with the country, oblige us to fight them on their own terms, or surrender at discretion; or, if that shall be deemed more adviseable, by a brilliant stroke endeavour to cut this army to pieces, and secure the possession of arms and stores, which they well know our inability to replace.

In his letter to Congress explaining the outcome of this council, which was against an immediate evacuation, he showed that he believed in the necessity of that action, even though he accepted it reluctantly. Speaking about the enemy, he noted, "It is now very clear from their movements, from our intelligence, and from all other factors, that, with their entire army on Long Island, except for about four thousand men who are on Staten Island, they plan to surround us on this island by taking positions behind us, while their ships effectively secure the front; and thus, by cutting off our communication with the mainland, force us to fight them on their terms, or surrender at our discretion; or, if that seems more advisable, make a bold move to try to destroy this army and secure the arms and supplies, which they know we cannot replace."

"Having their system unfolded to us, it becomes an important consideration how it could be most successfully opposed. On every side there is a choice of difficulties, and experience teaches us, that every measure on our part (however painful the reflection) must be taken with some apprehension, that all our troops will not do their duty.

"Now that their system has been revealed to us, it's crucial to think about how we can effectively oppose it. There are challenges everywhere, and experience shows us that every action we take (as difficult as it may be to acknowledge) has to be approached with some concern that not all of our troops will fulfill their responsibilities."

"In deliberating upon this great question," he added, "it was impossible to forget that history, our own experience, the advice of our ablest friends in Europe, the fears of the enemy, and even the declarations of congress, demonstrate that, on our side, the war should be defensive;—(it has ever been called a war of posts;)—that we should, on all occasions, avoid a general action, nor put any thing to the risk, unless compelled by necessity, into which we ought never to be drawn."

"In considering this important issue," he said, "it’s impossible to ignore that history, our own experiences, the advice of our best friends in Europe, the enemy’s fears, and even the statements from Congress all show that our approach to the war should be defensive;—(it’s always been referred to as a war of positions;)—that we should, at all times, steer clear of a large-scale battle and not take any risks unless absolutely necessary, which we should never allow ourselves to be forced into."

After communicating the decision which had been made by the council of officers, he stated the opinion of those who were in favour of an immediate evacuation with such force, as to confirm the belief that it remained his own.

After sharing the decision made by the council of officers, he expressed the views of those who supported an immediate evacuation with such strength that it convinced others he shared that opinion.

The majority, who overruled this opinion, did not expect to be able to defend the city, permanently, but to defer the time of losing it, in the hope of wasting so much of the campaign, before General Howe could obtain possession of it, as to prevent his undertaking any thing farther until the following year. They therefore advised a middle course between abandoning the town absolutely, and concentrating their whole strength for its defence. This was, to form the army into three divisions; one of which should remain in New York; the second be stationed at Kingsbridge, and the third occupy the intermediate space, so as to support either extreme. The sick were to be immediately removed to Orange Town. A belief that congress was inclined to maintain New York at every hazard, and a dread of the unfavourable impression which its evacuation might make on the people, seem to have had great influence in producing the determination to defend the place yet a short time longer.

The majority, who disagreed with this view, didn’t expect to defend the city permanently but wanted to buy some time before losing it. They hoped to delay General Howe from taking control long enough that he wouldn’t be able to do anything significant until the following year. So, they suggested a compromise between completely abandoning the town and fully committing their resources to its defense. The plan was to split the army into three divisions: one would stay in New York, the second would be positioned at Kingsbridge, and the third would fill the gap in between to support either side. The sick were to be moved immediately to Orange Town. The belief that Congress was willing to hold on to New York at any cost, along with the fear of how abandoning it might affect public opinion, seemed to heavily influence the decision to defend the city a little bit longer.

September 10.

This opinion was soon changed. The movements of the British general indicated clearly an intention either to break their line of communication, or to enclose the whole army in York Island. His dispositions were alike calculated to favour the one or the other of those objects. The general, who had continued to employ himself assiduously in the removal of the military stores to a place of safety,[43] called a second council to deliberate on the farther defence of the city, which determined, by a large majority, that it had become not only prudent, but absolutely necessary to withdraw the army from New York.

This opinion quickly changed. The movements of the British general clearly indicated an intention to disrupt their lines of communication or to surround the entire army on York Island. His strategies were designed to support either of those goals. The general, who had been diligently working to move the military supplies to a safe location,[43] called a second council to discuss the further defense of the city, which decided by a large majority that it was not only prudent but absolutely necessary to pull the army out of New York.

September 12.

In consequence of this determination, Brigadier General Mercer, who commanded the flying camp on the Jersey shore, was directed to move up the North river, to the post opposite fort Washington; and every effort was used to expedite the removal of the stores.

As a result of this decision, Brigadier General Mercer, who was in charge of the flying camp on the Jersey shore, was ordered to move up the North River to the location opposite Fort Washington; and every effort was made to speed up the removal of supplies.

On the morning of the fifteenth, three ships of war proceeded up the North river as high as Bloomingdale; a movement which entirely stopped the farther removal of stores by water. About eleven on the same day, Sir Henry Clinton, with a division of four thousand men who had embarked at the head of New Town bay, where they had lain concealed from the view of the troops posted on York Island, proceeded through that bay into the East river, which he crossed; and, under cover of the fire of five men of war, landed at a place called Kipp's bay, about three miles above New York.

On the morning of the fifteenth, three warships moved up the North River as far as Bloomingdale, completely halting further transportation of supplies by water. Around eleven that same day, Sir Henry Clinton, leading a group of four thousand troops who had secretly boarded at the head of New Town Bay, passed through that bay into the East River, crossed it, and, with the protection of fire from five warships, landed at a spot called Kipp’s Bay, about three miles north of New York.

New York evacuated.

The works thrown up to oppose a landing at this place, were of considerable strength, and capable of being defended for some time; but the troops stationed in them abandoned them without waiting to be attacked, and fled with precipitation. On the commencement of the cannonade, General Washington ordered the brigades of Parsons and Fellowes to the support of the troops posted in the lines, and rode himself towards the scene of action. The panic of those who had fled from the works was communicated to the troops ordered to sustain them; and the Commander-in-chief had the extreme mortification to meet the whole party retreating in the utmost disorder, totally regardless of the great efforts made by their generals to stop their disgraceful flight. Whilst General Washington was exerting himself to rally them, a small corps of the enemy appeared; and they again broke and fled in confusion. The only part to be taken was immediately to withdraw the few remaining troops from New York, and to secure the posts on the heights. For this latter purpose, the lines were instantly manned; but no attempt was made to force them. The retreat from New York was effected with an inconsiderable loss of men, sustained in a skirmish at Bloomingdale; but all the heavy artillery, and a large portion of the baggage, provisions, and military stores, much of which might have been saved had the post at Kipp's bay been properly defended, were unavoidably abandoned. In this shameful day, one colonel, one captain, three subalterns, and ten privates were killed: one lieutenant colonel, one captain, and one hundred and fifty-seven privates were missing.

The defenses set up to block a landing here were quite strong and could have held for a while, but the troops stationed there abandoned them without waiting for an attack and fled in a panic. When the cannon fire started, General Washington ordered the brigades of Parsons and Fellowes to support the troops in the lines and rode towards the action himself. The panic of those who had fled from the defenses spread to the troops ordered to back them up, and the Commander-in-chief felt extreme frustration as he encountered the entire group retreating in disarray, completely ignoring the efforts of their leaders to stop their disgraceful escape. While General Washington was trying to regroup them, a small enemy force showed up, and they again broke and ran in chaos. The only option left was to quickly pull back the few remaining troops from New York and secure the positions on the heights. For this, the lines were immediately manned, but no effort was made to challenge the enemy. The retreat from New York was carried out with minimal loss of life, sustained during a skirmish at Bloomingdale; however, all the heavy artillery and a significant amount of baggage, food, and military supplies, much of which could have been saved if Kipp's Bay had been properly defended, were unfortunately abandoned. On this disgraceful day, one colonel, one captain, three junior officers, and ten privates were killed; one lieutenant colonel, one captain, and one hundred fifty-seven privates were missing.

The unsoldierly conduct displayed on this occasion was not attributable to a want of personal courage, but to other causes. The apprehensions excited by the defeat on Long Island had not yet subsided; nor had the American troops recovered their confidence either in themselves or in their commanders. Their situation appeared to themselves to be perilous; and they had not yet acquired that temper which teaches the veteran to do his duty wherever he may be placed; to assure himself that others will do their duty likewise; and to rely that those, who take into view the situation of the whole, will not expose him to useless hazard; or neglect those precautions which the safety and advantage of the whole may require.

The unmilitary behavior shown on this occasion wasn't due to a lack of personal bravery, but to other reasons. The fears stirred up by the defeat on Long Island hadn't faded yet; nor had the American troops regained their trust in themselves or their leaders. They saw their situation as dangerous, and they hadn't yet developed the mindset that teaches a veteran to fulfill their duties no matter where they are; to trust that others will do their jobs too; and to depend on those who consider the overall situation to not put them at unnecessary risk or overlook the precautions needed for the safety and benefit of everyone.

Unfortunately, there existed in a great part of the army, several causes, in addition to the shortness of enlistments and reliance on militia, which were but too operative in obstructing the progress of these military sentiments. In New England, whence the supplies of men had been principally drawn, the zeal excited by the revolution had taken such a direction, as in a great degree to abolish those distinctions between the platoon officers and the soldiers, which are indispensable to the formation of an army suited to all the purposes of war. It has been already said that these officers, who constitute an important part of every army, were, in many companies, elected by the privates. Of consequence, a disposition to associate with them on the footing of equality, was a recommendation of more weight, and frequently conduced more to the choice, than individual merit. Gentlemen of high rank have stated that, in some instances, men were elected, who agreed to put their pay in a common stock with that of the soldiers, and divide equally with them. It is not cause of wonder, that among such officers, the most disgraceful and unmilitary practices should frequently prevail; and that the privates should not respect them sufficiently, to acquire habits of obedience and subordination. This vital defect had been in some degree remedied, in new modelling the army before Boston; but it still existed to a fatal extent.

Unfortunately, there were several reasons within a large part of the army, beyond the short enlistments and reliance on militia, that seriously hindered the development of military discipline. In New England, where most of the soldiers were recruited from, the enthusiasm generated by the revolution had led to a significant breakdown of the distinctions between platoon officers and soldiers, which are essential for creating an effective army for all aspects of warfare. It has already been noted that these officers, who are a crucial part of any army, were elected by the privates in many companies. As a result, the tendency to associate with them on equal terms often weighed more heavily in their selection than individual qualifications. High-ranking gentlemen have reported that, in some cases, men were elected who agreed to pool their pay with the soldiers and share it equally. It's not surprising that among such officers, unprofessional and disgraceful behaviors were common, and the privates did not respect them enough to develop habits of obedience and discipline. This crucial issue had been somewhat addressed by reorganizing the army before Boston, but it still persisted to a harmful degree.

September 15.

Having taken possession of New York, General Howe stationed a few troops in the town; and, with the main body of his army, encamped on the island near the American lines. His right was at Horen's Hook on the East river, and his left reached the North river near Bloomingdale; so that his encampment extended quite across the island, which is, in this place, scarcely two miles wide; and both his flanks were covered by his ships.

Having taken control of New York, General Howe stationed some troops in the city and set up camp with the main part of his army on the island near the American lines. His right flank was at Horen's Hook on the East River, and his left extended to the North River near Bloomingdale. His encampment stretched almost across the island, which here is barely two miles wide, and both flanks were protected by his ships.

The strongest point of the American lines was at Kingsbridge, both sides of which had been carefully fortified. M'Gowan's Pass, and Morris's Heights were also occupied in considerable force, and rendered capable of being defended against superior numbers. A strong detachment was posted in an intrenched camp on the heights of Haerlem, within about a mile and a half of the British lines.

The main stronghold of the American forces was at Kingsbridge, which had been carefully fortified on both sides. M'Gowan's Pass and Morris's Heights were also held by a significant number of troops, making them defensible against larger forces. A strong unit was stationed in a fortified camp on the heights of Harlem, roughly a mile and a half from the British lines.

The present position of the armies favoured the views of the American General. He wished to habituate his soldiers, by a series of successful skirmishes, to meet the enemy in the field; and he persuaded himself that his detachments, knowing a strong intrenched camp to be immediately in their rear, would engage without apprehension, would soon display their native courage, and would speedily regain the confidence they had lost.

The current position of the armies supported the American General's intentions. He wanted to train his soldiers through a series of successful skirmishes to face the enemy in the field. He convinced himself that his detachments, knowing there was a strong, fortified camp right behind them, would fight without fear, quickly show their natural bravery, and soon recover the confidence they had lost.

Opportunities to make the experiments he wished were soon afforded. The day after the retreat from New York, the British appeared in considerable force in the plains between the two camps; and the General immediately rode to his advanced posts, in order to make in person such arrangements as this movement might require. Soon after his arrival, Lieutenant Colonel Knowlton of Connecticut, who, at the head of a corps of rangers, had been skirmishing with this party, came in, and stated their numbers on conjecture at about three hundred men; the main body being concealed in a wood.

Opportunities to conduct the experiments he wanted quickly became available. The day after the retreat from New York, the British showed up in significant numbers on the plains between the two camps; and the General immediately rode to his forward positions to make the necessary arrangements for this movement. Shortly after he arrived, Lieutenant Colonel Knowlton from Connecticut, who had been skirmishing with this group at the head of a corps of rangers, reported that their numbers were estimated to be around three hundred men, with the main group hidden in a forest.

The General ordered Colonel Knowlton with his rangers, and Major Leitch with three companies of the third Virginia regiment, which had joined the army only the preceding day, to gain their rear, while he amused them with the appearance of making dispositions to attack their front.

The General ordered Colonel Knowlton and his rangers, along with Major Leitch and three companies from the third Virginia regiment, which had just joined the army the day before, to maneuver behind them while he made it look like he was preparing to attack them from the front.

Skirmish on the heights of Haerlem.

This plan succeeded. The British ran eagerly down a hill, in order to possess themselves of some fences and bushes, which presented an advantageous position against the party expected in front; and a firing commenced—but at too great a distance to do any execution. In the mean time, Colonel Knowlton, not being precisely acquainted with their new position, made his attack rather on their flank than rear; and a warm action ensued.

This plan worked. The British eagerly ran down a hill to take control of some fences and bushes that provided a strategic advantage against the group expected ahead; gunfire started, but it was too far away to be effective. Meanwhile, Colonel Knowlton, not fully aware of their new position, launched his attack more on their side than from behind, leading to an intense battle.

In a short time, Major Leitch, who had led the detachment with great intrepidity, was brought off the ground mortally wounded, having received three balls through his body; and soon afterwards the gallant Colonel Knowlton also fell. Not discouraged by the loss of their field officers, the captains maintained their ground, and continued the action with great animation. The British were reinforced; and General Washington ordered some detachments from the adjacent regiments of New England and Maryland, to the support of the Americans. Thus reinforced, they made a gallant charge, drove the enemy out of the wood into the plain, and were pressing him still farther, when the General, content with the present advantage, called back his troops to their intrenchments.[44]

In a short time, Major Leitch, who had bravely led the troops, was carried off the field mortally wounded, having taken three bullets to his body; and soon after, the brave Colonel Knowlton also fell. Not discouraged by the loss of their leaders, the captains held their ground and continued to fight with great energy. The British were reinforced; and General Washington ordered some detachments from the nearby regiments of New England and Maryland to support the Americans. With these reinforcements, they launched a brave charge, forcing the enemy out of the woods into the open field and pushing them further back, when the General, satisfied with the current advantage, called his troops back to their defenses.[44]

In this sharp conflict, the loss of the Americans, in killed and wounded, did not exceed fifty men. The British lost more than double that number. But the real importance of the affair was derived from its operation on the spirits of the whole army. It was the first success they had obtained during this campaign; and its influence was very discernible. To give it the more effect, the parole the next day was Leitch; and the General, in his orders, publicly thanked the troops under the command of that officer, who had first advanced on the enemy, and the others who had so resolutely supported them. He contrasted their conduct with that which had been exhibited the day before; and the result, he said, evidenced what might be done where officers and soldiers would exert themselves. Once more, therefore, he called upon them so to act, as not to disgrace the noble cause in which they were engaged. He appointed a successor to "the gallant and brave Colonel Knowlton, who would," he said, "have been an honour to any country, and who had fallen gloriously, fighting at his post."

In this intense clash, the Americans lost fewer than fifty men to casualties. The British lost more than twice that number. However, the real significance of this event came from its impact on the morale of the entire army. It was the first victory they had achieved in this campaign, and its influence was clearly visible. To enhance its effect, the parole the following day was Leitch; and the General, in his orders, publicly thanked the troops under that officer’s command, who had been the first to advance on the enemy, as well as those who had bravely supported them. He compared their actions to those of the previous day, stating that the outcome demonstrated what could be accomplished when officers and soldiers put in the effort. Once again, he urged them to act in a way that would honor the noble cause they were fighting for. He appointed a successor to “the gallant and brave Colonel Knowlton, who would,” he said, “have been an asset to any country, and who fell heroically while fighting at his post.”

In this active part of the campaign, when the utmost stretch of every faculty was required, to watch and counteract the plans of a skilful and powerful enemy, the effects of the original errors committed by the government, in its military establishment, were beginning to be so seriously felt, as to compel the Commander-in-chief to devote a portion of his time and attention to the complete removal of the causes which produced them.

In this active phase of the campaign, when every ability was being pushed to its limit to monitor and counter the strategies of a smart and strong enemy, the consequences of the government's initial mistakes in its military setup were starting to be seriously felt. This situation forced the Commander-in-chief to spend some of his time and effort on completely addressing the issues that caused them.

The situation of America was becoming extremely critical. The almost entire dissolution of the existing army, by the expiration of the time for which the greater number of the troops had been engaged, was fast approaching. No steps had been taken to recruit the new regiments which congress had resolved to raise for the ensuing campaign; and there was much reason to apprehend, that in the actual state of things, the terms offered would not hold forth sufficient inducements to fill them.

The situation in America was becoming very serious. The near complete breakdown of the current army, due to the expiration of service for most of the troops, was coming fast. No actions had been taken to recruit the new regiments that Congress had decided to raise for the upcoming campaign; and there were many reasons to worry that, given the current circumstances, the offers being made wouldn’t provide enough incentive to fill them.

September 24.
Letter on the state of the army.

With so unpromising a prospect before him, the General found himself pressed by an army, permanent in its establishment, supplied with every requisite of war, formidable for its discipline and the experience of its leaders, and superior to him in numbers. These circumstances, and the impressions they created, will be best exhibited by an extract from a letter written at the time to congress. It is in these words: "From the hours allotted to sleep, I will borrow a few moments to convey my thoughts, on sundry important matters, to congress. I shall offer them with that sincerity which ought to characterize a man of candour; and with the freedom which may be used in giving useful information, without incurring the imputation of presumption.

With such an unpromising situation ahead of him, the General found himself pressured by an army, established for the long term, equipped with everything necessary for war, impressive due to its discipline and the experience of its leaders, and outnumbering him. These conditions, and the thoughts they inspired, will be best illustrated by a quote from a letter written at the time to Congress. It states: "From the hours set aside for sleep, I will take a few moments to share my thoughts on several important matters with Congress. I will present them with the sincerity that should define an honest person; and with the openness that can be used to provide helpful information, without being seen as arrogant."

"We are now, as it were, upon the eve of another dissolution of our army. The remembrance of the difficulties which happened upon that occasion last year; the consequences which might have followed the change, if proper advantages had been taken by the enemy; added to a knowledge of the present temper and disposition of the troops; reflect but a very gloomy prospect upon the appearance of things now, and satisfy me, beyond the possibility of doubt, that unless some speedy and effectual measures are adopted by congress, our cause will be lost.

"We are now, so to speak, on the brink of another disbandment of our army. The memories of the challenges we faced during that time last year, along with the potential consequences of that shift if the enemy had taken advantage, along with an understanding of the current mood and attitude of the troops, cast a very bleak outlook on the situation now. It convinces me, without a shadow of a doubt, that unless Congress takes quick and effective action, our cause will be doomed."

"It is in vain to expect that any, or more than a trifling part of this army, will engage again in the service, on the encouragement offered by congress. When men find that their townsmen and companions are receiving twenty, thirty, and more dollars, for a few months service, (which is truly the case,) this can not be expected, without using compulsion; and to force them into the service would answer no valuable purpose. When men are irritated, and their passions inflamed, they fly hastily and cheerfully to arms; but after the first emotions are over, to expect among such people as compose the bulk of an army, that they are influenced by any other motives than those of interest, is to look for what never did, and I fear never will happen; the congress will deceive themselves therefore if they expect it.

"It’s pointless to think that any significant part of this army will sign up again based on the incentives offered by Congress. When people see that their neighbors and friends are getting twenty, thirty, or even more dollars for just a few months of service (which is really the case), that’s not something we can rely on without using force. Forcing them into service wouldn’t have any real benefit. When people are angry and their emotions are heightened, they rush into battle eagerly; but once that initial excitement wears off, expecting the majority of soldiers—who make up the core of the army—to be motivated by anything other than self-interest is unrealistic. Congress will be fooling themselves if they think otherwise."

"A soldier, reasoned with upon the goodness of the cause he is engaged in, and the inestimable rights he is contending for, hears you with patience, and acknowledges the truth of your observations; but adds, that it is of no more consequence to him than to others. The officer makes you the same reply, with this further remark, that his pay will not support him, and he can not ruin himself and family to serve his country, when every member of the community is equally benefited and interested by his labours. The few, therefore, who act upon principles of disinterestedness, are, comparatively speaking, no more than a drop in the ocean. It becomes evidently clear, then, that as this contest is not likely to become the work of a day; as the war must be carried on systematically; and to do it, you must have good officers; there is, in my judgment, no other possible means to obtain them, but by establishing your army upon a permanent footing, and giving your officers good pay. This will induce gentlemen, and men of character, to engage; and, until the bulk of your officers are composed of such persons as are actuated by principles of honour and a spirit of enterprise, you have little to expect from them. They ought to have such allowances as will enable them to live like, and support the character of gentlemen; and not be driven by a scanty pittance to the low and dirty arts which many of them practise, to filch the public of more than the difference of pay would amount to, upon an ample allowance. Besides, something is due to the man who puts his life in your hands, hazards his health, and forsakes the sweets of domestic enjoyments. Why a captain in the continental service should receive no more than five shillings currency per day, for performing the same duties that an officer of the same rank in the British service receives ten shillings sterling for, I never could conceive; especially, when the latter is provided with every necessary he requires, upon the best terms, and the former can scarcely procure them at any rate. There is nothing that gives a man consequence, and renders him fit for command, like a support that renders him independent of every body but the state he serves.

A soldier, when you discuss the importance of the cause he’s fighting for and the invaluable rights at stake, listens patiently and agrees with your points; however, he adds that it matters no more to him than to anyone else. The officer responds similarly, adding that his salary isn’t enough to support him, and he can't put his family at risk to serve his country when everyone benefits equally from his efforts. Thus, the few who act selflessly are, in comparison, just a drop in the ocean. It’s clear that this struggle is not going to be resolved quickly; the war needs to be fought systematically, and for that, you need competent officers. In my opinion, the only way to get them is to establish a permanent army and pay your officers well. This will attract respectable individuals. Until most of your officers are those driven by honor and a spirit of initiative, you shouldn’t expect much from them. They should be compensated enough to live like gentlemen and maintain that status, rather than being forced by a meager income to engage in dishonest practices to steal from the public that exceeds what a fair salary would provide. Moreover, something is owed to those who risk their lives, health, and the comfort of home. I can’t understand why a captain in the Continental Army should earn only five shillings a day for the same duties when a British officer of the same rank gets ten shillings and has everything he needs provided for him at good rates, while the former can barely get what he requires. Nothing gives a person more authority and makes them suitable for command like having the financial stability that allows them to be independent, except to the state they serve.

"With respect to the men, nothing but a good bounty can obtain them upon a permanent establishment, and for no shorter time than the continuance of the war ought they to be engaged; as facts incontestably prove that the difficulty and cost of enlistments increase with time. When the army was first raised at Cambridge, I am persuaded the men might have been got, without a bounty, for the war: after that, they began to see that the contest was not likely to end so speedily as was imagined, and to feel their consequence, by remarking, that to get their militia, in the course of the last year, many towns were induced to give them a bounty. Foreseeing the evils resulting from this, and the destructive consequences which would unavoidably follow short enlistments, I took the liberty, in a long letter, (date not now recollected, as my letter book is not here,) to recommend the enlistments for and during the war, assigning such reasons for it, as experience has since convinced me, were well founded. At that time, twenty dollars would, I am persuaded, have engaged the men for this term: but it will not do to look back—and if the present opportunity is slipped, I am persuaded that twelve months more will increase our difficulties four fold. I shall therefore take the liberty of giving it as my opinion, that a good bounty be immediately offered, aided by the proffer of at least a hundred, or a hundred and fifty acres of land, and a suit of clothes, and a blanket, to each non-commissioned officer and soldier, as I have good authority for saying, that however high the men's pay may appear, it is barely sufficient, in the present scarcity and dearness of all kinds of goods, to keep them in clothes, much less to afford support to their families. If this encouragement, then, is given to the men, and such pay allowed to the officers, as will induce gentlemen of liberal character and liberal sentiments to engage; and proper care and caution be used in the nomination, (having more regard to the characters of persons than the number of men they can enlist,) we should, in a little time, have an army able to cope with any that can be opposed to it, as there are excellent materials to form one out of: but whilst the only merit an officer possesses is his ability to raise men; whilst those men consider and treat him as an equal, and in the character of an officer, regard him no more than a broomstick, being mixed together as one common herd; no order nor discipline can prevail, nor will the officer ever meet with that respect which is essentially necessary to due subordination.

"Regarding the soldiers, only a good bounty can secure them for a long-term commitment, and they should be engaged for no less than the duration of the war, as it is clearly evident that the challenges and costs of enlistments increase over time. When the army was first formed in Cambridge, I believe the soldiers could have been recruited without a bounty for the war: but then, they began to realize that the conflict wasn’t going to end as soon as they had hoped and they felt their value, noticing that many towns offered bounties to get their militias over the past year. Anticipating the problems that would arise from this and the damaging effects of short enlistments, I took the liberty of suggesting in a lengthy letter (I can’t recall the date, as my letterbook isn’t here) that enlistments should be for the duration of the war, providing reasons which experience has proven to be valid. At that time, I believe twenty dollars could have secured the soldiers for this period: but we can’t dwell on the past—and if we let this opportunity pass, I’m convinced that waiting another twelve months will only increase our challenges fourfold. Therefore, I would like to propose that a good bounty be offered immediately, along with at least one hundred or one hundred and fifty acres of land, a suit of clothes, and a blanket for each non-commissioned officer and soldier, as I have solid reason to believe that even though soldiers’ pay might seem high, it barely covers clothing given the current scarcity and high prices of all goods, let alone support their families. If this encouragement is provided to the soldiers, and adequate pay is set for the officers to attract gentlemen of good character and liberal views, and if we take proper care in selecting individuals (prioritizing their character over the number of recruits they can commandeer), we should soon have an army capable of facing any adversaries, as there are excellent candidates available to form one: but as long as the only qualification an officer has is the ability to recruit soldiers; as long as those soldiers view and treat him as equal, regarding him as little more than a piece of furniture, all mixed together as one common group; no order or discipline can exist, nor will the officer ever receive the respect that is essential for proper hierarchy."

"To place any dependence upon militia, is assuredly resting upon a broken staff. Men just dragged from the tender scenes of domestic life; unaccustomed to the din of arms; totally unacquainted with every kind of military skill, which, being followed by a want of confidence in themselves, when opposed to troops regularly trained, disciplined, and appointed—superior in knowledge, and superior in arms—makes them timid, and ready to fly from their own shadows. Besides, the sudden change in their manner of living, particularly in their lodging, brings on sickness in many, impatience in all; and such an unconquerable desire of returning to their respective homes, that it not only produces shameful and scandalous desertions among themselves, but infuses the like spirit into others. Again, men accustomed to unbounded freedom and no control, can not brook the restraint which is indispensably necessary to the good order and government of an army; without which, licentiousness, and every kind of disorder, triumphantly reign. To bring men to a proper degree of subordination, is not the work of a day, a month, or a year; and unhappily for us, and the cause we are engaged in, the little discipline I have been labouring to establish in the army under my immediate command, is in a manner done away by having such a mixture of troops as have been called together within these few months."

"Relying on a militia is definitely like leaning on a broken staff. These are men recently pulled away from their comfortable home lives; they're not used to the noise of battle and lack any military skills. This, combined with their low confidence when facing well-trained and experienced troops—superior in knowledge and weaponry—makes them fearful and ready to escape at the slightest provocation. Moreover, the sudden change in their lifestyle, especially their living conditions, leads to sickness for many and impatience for all. Their overwhelming desire to return home not only causes shameful and scandalous desertions among themselves but also spreads that same spirit to others. Additionally, men who are used to complete freedom and no restrictions can't handle the discipline that’s essential for maintaining order in an army. Without this order, chaos and all kinds of disorder run rampant. Training men to be properly subordinate isn't something that happens overnight, or in a month, or even a year. Unfortunately for us and the cause we're fighting for, the little bit of discipline I've been trying to instill in the army I directly command has been severely undermined by the mix of troops that have been pulled together in the past few months."

The frequent remonstrances of the Commander-in-chief; the opinions of all military men; and the severe, but correcting hand of experience, had at length produced some effect on the government of the union;—and soon after the defeat on Long Island, congress had directed the committee composing the board of war, to prepare a plan of operations for the next succeeding campaign. Their report proposed a permanent army, to be enlisted for the war, and to be raised by the several states, in proportion to their ability. A bounty of twenty dollars was offered to each recruit; and small portions of land to every officer and soldier.

The constant objections from the Commander-in-chief, the views of military experts, and the tough but necessary lessons learned from experience eventually made an impact on the government of the union. Shortly after the defeat on Long Island, Congress instructed the committee that made up the board of war to come up with a plan for the upcoming campaign. Their report suggested establishing a permanent army that would be recruited for the war, with each state contributing based on its capacity. A bonus of twenty dollars was offered to each new recruit, along with small parcels of land for every officer and soldier.

October 4.

The resolutions adopting this report were received by the Commander-in-chief soon after the transmission of the foregoing letter. Believing the inducements they held forth for the completion of the army to be still insufficient, he, in his letter acknowledging the receipt of them, urged in the most serious terms, the necessity of raising the pay of the officers, and the bounty offered to recruits. "Give me leave to say, sir," he observed, "I say it with due deference and respect, (and my knowledge of the facts, added to the importance of the cause, and the stake I hold it in, must justify the freedom,) that your affairs are in a more unpromising way than you seem to apprehend.

The resolutions adopting this report were received by the Commander-in-Chief shortly after the earlier letter was sent. Thinking that the reasons given for completing the army were still not enough, he, in his letter acknowledging receipt of them, emphasized very strongly the need to raise the pay for officers and the bonuses offered to recruits. "Let me say, sir," he remarked, "I say this with proper respect, (and my understanding of the facts, along with the importance of the cause and my investment in it, justifies my honesty,) that your situation is in a much worse state than you seem to realize."

"Your army, as mentioned in my last, is upon the eve of political dissolution. True it is, you have voted a larger one in lieu of it; but the season is late, and there is a material difference between voting battalions, and raising men. In the latter, there are more difficulties than Congress seem aware of; which makes it my duty (as I have been informed of the prevailing sentiments of this army) to inform them, that unless the pay of the officers (especially that of the field officers) is raised, the chief part of those that are worth retaining will leave the service at the expiration of the present term; as the soldiers will also, if some greater encouragement is not offered them, than twenty dollars and one hundred acres of land."

"Your army, as I mentioned before, is on the verge of breaking apart. It's true that you voted for a larger force instead; however, it's late in the season, and there's a significant difference between voting for battalions and actually recruiting soldiers. There are more challenges involved in the latter than Congress seems to realize, which makes it my responsibility (since I know the current sentiments of this army) to let them know that unless the pay for the officers (especially the field officers) is increased, most of the valuable ones will leave the service when their current term ends. The soldiers will also leave if they aren't offered better incentives than just twenty dollars and a hundred acres of land."

After urging in strong terms the necessity of a more liberal compensation to the army, and stating that the British were actually raising a regiment with a bounty of ten pounds sterling for each recruit, he added, "when the pay and establishment of an officer once become objects of interested attention, the sloth, negligence, and even disobedience of orders, which at this time but too generally prevail, will be purged off;—but while the service is viewed with indifference; while the officer conceives that he is rather conferring than receiving an obligation: there will be a total relaxation of all order and discipline; and every thing will move heavily on, to the great detriment of the service, and inexpressible trouble and vexation of the general.

After strongly emphasizing the need for better pay for the army, and noting that the British were actually recruiting a regiment with a bonus of ten pounds sterling for each new recruit, he added, "When an officer's pay and position become matters of serious interest, the laziness, carelessness, and even disobedience that are so common right now will be eliminated;—but while the service is treated with indifference; while the officer believes he is giving rather than receiving a favor: there will be a complete breakdown of order and discipline; and everything will move sluggishly, ultimately harming the service and causing immense trouble and frustration for the general."

"The critical situation of our affairs at this time will justify my saying, that no time is to be lost in making fruitless experiments. An unavailing trial of a month, to get an army upon the terms proposed, may render it impracticable to do it at all, and prove fatal to our cause; as I am not sure whether any rubs in the way of our enlistments, or unfavourable turn in our affairs, may not prove the means of the enemy's recruiting men faster than we do."

"The critical situation of our affairs right now means we can't waste any time on pointless experiments. Spending a month trying to assemble an army under the proposed terms might make it impossible to do so later and could be disastrous for our cause. I'm unsure if any obstacles in our enlistments or any setbacks in our situation could allow the enemy to recruit soldiers faster than we can."

After stating at large the confusion and delay, inseparable from the circumstance that the appointments for the new army were to be made by the states, the letter proceeds, "upon the present plan, I plainly foresee an intervention of time between the old and new army, which must be filled with militia, if to be had, with whom no man, who has any regard for his own reputation, can undertake to be answerable for consequences. I shall also be mistaken in my conjectures, if we do not lose the most valuable officers in this army, under the present mode of appointing them; consequently, if we have an army at all, it will be composed of materials not only entirely raw, but, if uncommon pains are not taken, entirely unfit: and I see such a distrust and jealousy of military power, that the Commander-in-chief has not an opportunity, even by recommendation, to give the least assurance of reward for the most essential services.

After detailing the confusion and delays that come from the fact that the states are responsible for appointing the new army, the letter continues, "with the current plan, I clearly see a gap in time between the old and new army, which must be filled with militia, if available, and no one who cares about their reputation can take responsibility for the outcomes. I will also be wrong in my assumptions if we don't end up losing our best officers in this army due to the current way of appointing them; therefore, if we do have an army, it will consist of inexperienced people who, unless significant efforts are made, will be completely unfit: and I see such a lack of trust and suspicion of military power that the Commander-in-chief doesn't have the chance, even through recommendations, to provide any assurance of rewards for the most vital services."

"In a word, such a cloud of perplexing circumstances appears before me, without one flattering hope, that I am thoroughly convinced, unless the most vigorous and decisive exertions are immediately adopted to remedy these evils, the certain and absolute loss of our liberties will be the inevitable consequence: as one unhappy stroke will throw a powerful weight into the scale against us, and enable General Howe to recruit his army, as fast as we shall ours; numbers being disposed, and many actually doing so already. Some of the most probable remedies, and such as experience has brought to my more intimate knowledge, I have taken the liberty to point out; the rest I beg leave to submit to the consideration of congress.

"In short, a confusing set of circumstances is laid out before me, with no encouraging hope in sight, and I am completely convinced that unless we take strong and decisive action right away to fix these issues, we will inevitably lose our freedoms. Just one unfortunate event could tip the balance against us, allowing General Howe to rebuild his army just as quickly as we do ours, with many already preparing to join. I’ve taken the liberty to suggest some of the most likely solutions, based on my own experience, and I respectfully submit the rest for Congress to consider."

"I ask pardon for taking up so much of their time with my opinions, but I should betray that trust which they and my country have reposed in me, were I to be silent upon matters so extremely interesting."

"I apologize for taking up so much of their time with my opinions, but I would betray the trust that they and my country have placed in me if I stayed silent on such important topics."

On receiving this very serious letter, congress passed resolutions conforming to many of its suggestions. The pay of the officers was raised, and a suit of clothes allowed annually to each soldier: The legislatures of the states having troops in the continental service, either at New York, Ticonderoga, or New Jersey, were requested to depute committees to those places in order to officer the regiments on the new establishment: and it was recommended to the committees to consult the General on the subject of appointments.

Upon receiving this very serious letter, Congress passed resolutions that aligned with many of its suggestions. The pay for officers was increased, and each soldier was granted an annual allowance for a suit of clothes. The legislatures of the states with troops in continental service, whether in New York, Ticonderoga, or New Jersey, were asked to send committees to those locations to organize the regiments under the new structure. It was recommended that the committees consult the General regarding the appointments.

 

Washington's Headquarters at White Plains

Washington's Headquarters at White Plains

Washington's Headquarters at White Plains

Washington's HQ at White Plains

Here, twenty-two miles northeast of New York City, Washington made his headquarters in October, 1776, and directed the Battle of White Plains or Chatterton Hill. Opposed to the American forces was a British army, greatly superior in numbers, under General Howe, whose delay in attaching the Americans enabled Washington to take up an unassailable position at North Castle, preparatory to his subsequent masterly retreat across New Jersey.

Here, twenty-two miles northeast of New York City, Washington set up his headquarters in October 1776 and led the Battle of White Plains, also known as Chatterton Hill. Facing the American forces was a much larger British army under General Howe, whose delay in attacking the Americans allowed Washington to secure an unassailable position at North Castle, in preparation for his skillful retreat across New Jersey.


CHAPTER VI.

The British land at Frog's Neck.... The American army evacuates York Island, except fort Washington.... Both armies move towards the White Plains.... Battle of the White Plains.... The British army returns to Kingsbridge.... General Washington crosses the North river.... The lines of fort Washington carried by the British, and the garrison made prisoners.... Evacuation of fort Lee.... Weakness of the American army.... Ineffectual attempts to raise the militia.... General Washington retreats through Jersey.... General Washington crosses the Delaware.... Danger of Philadelphia.... Capture of General Lee.... The British go into winter quarters.... Battle of Trenton.... Of Princeton.... Firmness of congress.

The British land at Frog's Neck.... The American army evacuates York Island, except for Fort Washington.... Both armies move towards White Plains.... Battle of White Plains.... The British army returns to Kingsbridge.... General Washington crosses the North River.... The lines of Fort Washington fall to the British, and the garrison is taken prisoner.... Evacuation of Fort Lee.... Weakness of the American army.... Ineffective attempts to gather the militia.... General Washington retreats through New Jersey.... General Washington crosses the Delaware.... Danger to Philadelphia.... Capture of General Lee.... The British settle into winter quarters.... Battle of Trenton.... Of Princeton.... Determination of Congress.

 

1776

The armies did not long retain their position on York Island. General Howe was sensible of the strength of the American camp, and was not disposed to force it. His plan was to compel General Washington to abandon it, or to give battle in a situation in which a defeat must be attended with the total destruction of his army. With this view, after throwing up entrenchments on M'Gowan's hill for the protection of New York, he determined to gain the rear of the American camp, by the New England road, and also to possess himself of the North river above Kingsbridge. October 9.To assure himself of the practicability of acquiring the command of the river, three frigates passed up it under the fire from fort Washington, and from the opposite post on the Jersey shore, afterwards called fort Lee, without sustaining any injury from the batteries, or being impeded by the chevaux-de-frise which had been sunk in the channel between those forts.

The armies didn’t hold their position on York Island for long. General Howe recognized the strength of the American camp and wasn’t inclined to attack it directly. His strategy was to force General Washington to leave or to engage in battle where a defeat would lead to the complete destruction of his army. With this goal in mind, after building fortifications on M'Gowan's hill to protect New York, he decided to maneuver around to the back of the American camp via the New England road and also to take control of the North River above Kingsbridge. October 9. To confirm that he could take control of the river, three frigates navigated up it under fire from Fort Washington and the opposite position on the Jersey shore, later known as Fort Lee, without suffering any damage from the batteries or being obstructed by the chevaux-de-frise that had been sunk in the channel between those forts.

Twelfth.
The enemy land at Frog's Neck.

This point being ascertained, he embarked a great part of his army on board flat bottomed boats, and, passing through Hurl Gate into the Sound, landed at Frog's Neck, about nine miles from the camp on the heights of Haerlem.

This established, he loaded a large portion of his army onto flat-bottomed boats and, moving through Hurl Gate into the Sound, landed at Frog's Neck, about nine miles from the camp on the heights of Harlem.

In consequence of this movement, Washington strengthened the post at Kingsbridge, and detached some regiments to West Chester for the purpose of skirmishing with the enemy, so soon as he should march from the ground he occupied. The road from Frog's Point to Kingsbridge leads through a strong country, intersected by numerous stone fences, so as to render it difficult to move artillery, or even infantry, in compact columns, except along the main road, which had been broken up in several places. The General, therefore, entertained sanguine hopes of the event, should a direct attack be made on his camp.

As a result of this movement, Washington reinforced the position at Kingsbridge and sent some regiments to West Chester to engage in skirmishes with the enemy as soon as they moved from their current location. The road from Frog's Point to Kingsbridge runs through rugged terrain, filled with stone fences, making it hard to move artillery or even infantry in tight formations, except along the main road, which had been damaged in several spots. Therefore, the General had high hopes for the outcome if a direct attack was launched on his camp.

General Howe continued some days waiting for his artillery, military stores, and reinforcements from Staten Island, which were detained by unfavourable winds.

General Howe waited for several days for his artillery, military supplies, and reinforcements from Staten Island, which were held up by bad weather.

October 16.
The American army evacuates York island except Fort Washington.

In the mean time, as the habits of thinking in America required that every important measure should be the result of consultation, and should receive the approbation of a majority, the propriety of removing the American army from its present situation was submitted to a council of the general officers. After much investigation, it was declared to be impracticable, without a change of position, to keep up their communication with the country, and avoid being compelled to fight under great disadvantages, or to surrender themselves prisoners of war. General Lee, who had just arrived from the south, and whose experience as well as late success gave great weight to his opinions, urged the necessity of this movement with much earnestness. It was, at the same time, determined to hold fort Washington, and to defend it as long as possible. A resolution of congress of the 11th of October, desiring General Washington, by every art and expense, to obstruct, if possible, the navigation of the river, contributed, not inconsiderably, to this determination.

In the meantime, since the way people thought in America meant that every important decision needed to come from discussions and have the approval of the majority, the idea of moving the American army from its current position was brought to a meeting of the top officers. After thorough review, it was concluded that it would be impossible to maintain communication with the country and avoid having to fight under unfavorable conditions or become prisoners of war without changing their position. General Lee, who had just arrived from the south and whose experience and recent success lent significant weight to his views, strongly advocated for this movement. At the same time, it was decided to hold Fort Washington and defend it for as long as possible. A resolution from Congress on October 11th, asking General Washington to do everything he could, at any cost, to obstruct the navigation of the river, played an important role in this decision.

In pursuance of this opinion of the military council, measures were taken for moving the army up the North River, so as to extend its front, or left, towards the White Plains, beyond the British right, and thus keep open its communication with the country. The right, or rear division, remained a few days longer about Kingsbridge under the command of General Lee, for the security of the heavy baggage and military stores, which, in consequence of the difficulty of obtaining wagons, could be but slowly removed.

In line with the military council's opinion, steps were taken to move the army up the North River to expand its front, or left, toward the White Plains, beyond the British right, and maintain communication with the country. The right, or rear division, stayed a few days longer near Kingsbridge under General Lee’s command to secure the heavy baggage and military supplies, which were slow to be moved due to the difficulty in obtaining wagons.

October 18.

General Howe, after uniting his forces at Pell's Point, moved forward his whole army, except four brigades destined for the defence of New York, through Pelham's manor, towards New Rochelle. Some skirmishes took place on the march with a part of Glover's brigade, in which the conduct of the Americans was mentioned with satisfaction by the Commander-in-chief; and, as General Howe took post at New Rochelle, a village on the Sound, General Washington occupied the heights between that place and the North River.

General Howe, after bringing his troops together at Pell's Point, advanced his entire army, except for four brigades designated for the defense of New York, through Pelham's manor, toward New Rochelle. There were some skirmishes during the march involving part of Glover's brigade, in which the behavior of the Americans was noted with approval by the Commander-in-chief. As General Howe established his position at New Rochelle, a village by the Sound, General Washington took control of the heights between that location and the North River.

October 21.
Both armies move towards the White Plains.

At New Rochelle, the British army was joined by the second division of Germans, under the command of General Knyphausen, and by an incomplete regiment of cavalry from Ireland; some of whom had been captured on their passage. Both armies now moved towards the White Plains, a strong piece of ground already occupied by a detachment of militia. The main body of the American troops formed a long line of entrenched camps, extending from twelve to thirteen miles, on the different heights from Valentine's Hill, near Kingsbridge, to the White Plains, fronting the British line of march, and the Brunx, which divided the two armies. The motions of General Howe were anxiously watched, not only for the purposes of security, and of avoiding a general action, but in order to seize any occasion which might present itself of engaging his out-posts with advantage. While the British army lay at New Rochelle, the position of a corps of American loyalists commanded by Major Rogers was supposed to furnish such an occasion. He was advanced, farther eastward, to Mamaraneck, on the Sound, where he was believed to be covered by the other troops. An attempt was made to surprise him in the night, by a detachment which should pass between him and the main body of the British army, and, by a coup de main, bear off his whole corps. Major Rogers was surprised, and about sixty of his regiment killed and taken. The loss of the Americans was only two killed, and eight or ten wounded; among the latter was Major Green of Virginia, a brave officer, who led the detachment, and who received a ball through his body.

At New Rochelle, the British army was joined by the second division of Germans, led by General Knyphausen, along with an incomplete cavalry regiment from Ireland, some of whom had been captured during their journey. Both armies then moved towards White Plains, a stronghold already occupied by a group of militia. The main body of American troops set up a long line of fortified camps, stretching twelve to thirteen miles across the various heights from Valentine's Hill, near Kingsbridge, to White Plains, facing the British line of advance and the Bronx River, which separated the two armies. General Howe's movements were closely monitored, not just for security and to prevent a full-scale battle, but to take advantage of any opportunities to engage his outposts successfully. While the British army was stationed at New Rochelle, a group of American loyalists under Major Rogers was thought to provide such an opportunity. He was further east, in Mamaroneck along the Sound, where he was believed to be supported by other troops. A plan was made to surprise him at night with a detachment that would maneuver between him and the main British army, attempting to quickly overpower his entire corps. Major Rogers was caught off guard, and about sixty of his regiment were killed or captured. The Americans lost only two men killed, with about eight or ten wounded; among them was Major Green from Virginia, a brave officer who led the detachment and was shot through the body.

Not long afterwards, a regiment of Pennsylvania riflemen, under Colonel Hand, engaged an equal number of Hessian chasseurs, with some advantage.

Not long after, a regiment of Pennsylvania riflemen, led by Colonel Hand, faced off against an equal number of Hessian chasseurs, gaining some advantage.

The caution of the English general was increased by these evidences of enterprise in his adversary. His object seems to have been to avoid skirmishes, and to bring on a general action, if that could be effected under favourable circumstances; if not, he calculated on nearly all the advantages of a victory from the approaching dissolution of the American army. He proceeded therefore slowly. His march was in close order, his encampments compact, and well guarded with artillery; and the utmost circumspection was used to leave no vulnerable point.

The English general was even more cautious due to the signs of initiative from his opponent. He aimed to avoid minor battles and wanted to engage in a major confrontation, if it could happen under favorable conditions; if not, he planned to gain almost all the benefits of a victory from the impending collapse of the American army. As a result, he moved slowly. His troops marched in tight formation, his camps were organized and securely protected with artillery, and he took great care to ensure there were no weak points.

October 25.

As the sick and baggage reached a place of safety, General Washington gradually drew in his out-posts, and took possession of the heights on the east side of the Brunx, fronting the head of the British columns, at the distance of seven or eight miles from them. The next day, he was joined by General Lee, who, after securing the sick and the baggage, had, with considerable address, brought up the rear division of the army; an operation the more difficult as the deficiency of teams was such that a large portion of the labour usually performed by horses or oxen, devolved on men.

As the injured and supplies arrived at a safe place, General Washington gradually pulled back his outposts and took control of the high ground on the east side of the Bronx, facing the front of the British columns, about seven or eight miles away. The next day, he was joined by General Lee, who, after ensuring the safety of the injured and supplies, skillfully brought up the rear division of the army; a tough task since there weren't enough teams, meaning that much of the work normally done by horses or oxen fell to the soldiers.

General Washington was encamped on high broken ground, with his right flank on the Brunx. This stream meandered so as also to cover the front of his right wing, which extended along the road leading towards New Rochelle, as far as the brow of the hill where his centre was posted. His left, which formed almost a right angle with his centre, and was nearly parallel to his right, extended along the hills northward, so as to keep possession of the commanding ground, and secure a retreat, should it be necessary, to a still stronger position in his rear.

General Washington was camped on elevated, uneven terrain, with his right side next to the Bronx. The stream meandered in a way that protected the front of his right flank, which stretched along the road toward New Rochelle, as far as the top of the hill where his center was stationed. His left flank, which formed almost a right angle with the center and ran parallel to the right, extended along the hills to the north, ensuring they held the higher ground and could retreat to an even stronger position behind them if needed.

On the right of the army, and on the west side of the Brunx, about one mile from camp, on a road leading from the North River, was a hill, of which General M'Dougal was ordered to take possession, for the purpose of covering the right flank. His detachment consisted of about sixteen hundred men, principally militia; and his communication with the main army was open, that part of the Brunx being passable without difficulty.

On the right side of the army, and to the west of the Brunx, about a mile from camp, there was a hill along a road leading from the North River. General M'Dougal was instructed to secure this hill to protect the right flank. His unit included about sixteen hundred men, mostly militia, and he had an open line of communication with the main army, as that section of the Brunx was easily passable.

Intrenchments were thrown up to strengthen the lines.

Entrenchments were built to reinforce the lines.

General Howe, having made arrangements to attack Washington in his camp, advanced early in the morning in two columns, the right commanded by Sir Henry Clinton, and the left by General Knyphausen; and, about ten, his van appeared in full view, on which a cannonade commenced without much execution on either side.

General Howe, after planning an attack on Washington in his camp, moved out early in the morning in two groups: the right led by Sir Henry Clinton and the left by General Knyphausen. Around ten o'clock, his front line came into full view, and a cannon fire started, but it didn’t have much impact on either side.

October 28.
Battle of the White Plains.

The British right formed behind a rising ground, about a mile in front of the American camp, and extending from the road leading from Mamaraneck towards the Brunx, stood opposed to the American centre.

The British right positioned itself on a hill about a mile in front of the American camp, stretching from the road that leads from Mamaroneck towards the Bronx, directly across from the American center.

On viewing Washington's situation, Howe, who accompanied Knyphausen, determined to carry the hill occupied by M'Dougal, as preliminary to an attack on the centre and right of the American camp. He therefore directed Colonel Rawle, with a brigade of Hessians, to cross the Brunx and make a circuit so as to turn M'Dougal's right flank, while Brigadier General Leslie, with a strong corps of British and Hessian troops should attack him in front. When Rawle had gained his position, the detachment commanded by Leslie also crossed the Brunx, and commenced a vigorous attack.[45] The militia in the front line immediately fled; but the regulars maintained their ground with great gallantry. Colonel Smallwood's regiment of Maryland, and Colonel Reitzimer's of New York, advanced boldly towards the foot of the hill to meet Leslie, but, after a sharp encounter, were overpowered by numbers, and compelled to retreat. General Leslie then attacked the remaining part of M'Dougal's forces, who were soon driven from the hill, but kept up for some time an irregular fire from the stone walls about the scene of action. General Putnam, with Real's brigade, was ordered to support them; but not having arrived till the hill was lost, the attempt to regain it was deemed unadviseable, and the troops retreated to the main army.

Observing Washington's situation, Howe, who was with Knyphausen, decided to take the hill occupied by M'Dougal as a first step before attacking the center and right side of the American camp. He instructed Colonel Rawle, along with a brigade of Hessians, to cross the Brunx and make a maneuver to outflank M'Dougal's right while Brigadier General Leslie, with a strong force of British and Hessian troops, attacked him head-on. Once Rawle secured his position, Leslie's unit also crossed the Brunx and launched a fierce attack.[45] The militia in the front line immediately fled, but the regular troops stood their ground bravely. Colonel Smallwood's regiment from Maryland and Colonel Reitzimer's from New York moved boldly toward the foot of the hill to confront Leslie, but after a fierce clash, they were outnumbered and forced to retreat. General Leslie then targeted the remaining part of M'Dougal's forces, driving them off the hill, though they continued to fire irregularly from the stone walls surrounding the area. General Putnam, with Real's brigade, was ordered to support them, but as he arrived after the hill was lost, attempting to retake it was considered unwise, and the troops fell back to the main army.

In this animated engagement, the loss was supposed to be nearly equal. That of the Americans was between three and four hundred in killed, wounded, and taken. Colonel Smallwood was among the wounded.

In this lively encounter, the losses were expected to be about the same. The Americans lost between three and four hundred in killed, wounded, and captured. Colonel Smallwood was among the injured.

General Washington continued in his lines expecting an assault. But a considerable part of the day having been exhausted in gaining the hill which had been occupied by M'Dougal, the meditated attempt on his intrenchments was postponed until the next morning; and the British army lay on their arms the following night, in order of battle, on the ground taken during the day.

General Washington stayed in his positions, anticipating an attack. However, since a significant portion of the day was spent taking the hill that had been held by M'Dougal, the planned assault on his defenses was pushed to the next morning. The British army rested on their weapons that night, ready for battle on the ground they had captured during the day.

October 30.

This interval was employed by General Washington in strengthening his works, removing his sick and baggage, and preparing for the expected attack by adopting the arrangement of his troops to the existing state of things. His left maintained its position; but his right was drawn back to stronger ground. Perceiving this, and being unwilling to leave any thing to hazard, Howe resolved to postpone farther offensive operations, until Lord Percy should arrive with four battalions from New York, and two from Mamaraneck. This reinforcement was received on the evening of the thirtieth, and preparations were then made to force the American intrenchments the next morning. In the night, and during the early part of the succeeding day, a violent rain still farther postponed the assault.

This time was used by General Washington to strengthen his positions, move his sick and equipment, and get ready for the anticipated attack by adjusting the arrangement of his troops to the current situation. His left held its ground, but his right was pulled back to more defensible territory. Noticing this, and wanting to avoid any risks, Howe decided to delay further offensive actions until Lord Percy arrived with four battalions from New York and two from Mamaroneck. This reinforcements arrived on the evening of the thirtieth, and plans were made to break through the American fortifications the next morning. However, that night and into the early part of the next day, heavy rain further delayed the attack.

Having now removed his provisions and heavy baggage to much stronger ground, and apprehending that the British general, whose left wing extended along the height, taken from M'Dougal, to his rear, might turn his camp, and occupy the strong ground to which he designed to retreat, should an attempt on his lines prove successful, General Washington changed his position in the night, and withdrew to the heights of North Castle, about five miles from the White Plains.

Having moved his supplies and heavy gear to much safer ground, and realizing that the British general, whose left flank stretched from M'Dougal to his rear, could potentially outmaneuver his camp and take the strong ground where he intended to retreat if there was a successful attack on his lines, General Washington repositioned himself during the night and retreated to the North Castle heights, about five miles from the White Plains.

November 1.

Deeming this position too strong to be attempted with prudence, General Howe determined to change his plan of operations, and to give a new direction to his efforts.[46]

Thinking this position was too risky to take on carefully, General Howe decided to alter his strategy and redirect his efforts.[46]

While forts Washington and Lee were held by the Americans, his movements were checked, and York Island insecure. With a view to the acquisition of these posts, he directed General Knyphausen to take possession of Kingsbridge, which was defended by a small party of Americans placed in fort Independence. On his approach, this party retreated to fort Washington; and Knyphausen encamped between that place and Kingsbridge.

While forts Washington and Lee were held by the Americans, his movements were restricted, and York Island was at risk. To gain control of these posts, he ordered General Knyphausen to take over Kingsbridge, which was defended by a small group of Americans stationed at Fort Independence. When he arrived, this group withdrew to Fort Washington, and Knyphausen set up camp between that location and Kingsbridge.

November 5.
The British army returns to Kingsbridge.

In the mean time, General Howe retired slowly down the North River. His designs were immediately penetrated by the American general, who perceived the necessity of passing a part of his army into Jersey, but was restrained from immediately leaving the strong ground he occupied by the apprehension that his adversary might, in that event, return suddenly and gain his rear. A council of war was called, which determined unanimously, that, should General Howe continue his march towards New York, all the troops raised on the west side of the Hudson should cross that river, to be afterwards followed by those raised in the eastern part of the continent, leaving three thousand men for the defence of the Highlands about the North river.

In the meantime, General Howe moved slowly down the North River. The American general quickly figured out his plans and realized he needed to move some of his army into Jersey. However, he hesitated to leave his secure position, worried that his opponent might suddenly attack and hit him from behind. A council of war was convened, and they unanimously decided that if General Howe continued his march toward New York, all the troops on the west side of the Hudson would cross the river, followed later by those from the eastern part of the country, while leaving three thousand men to defend the Highlands around the North River.

In a letter to congress communicating this movement of the British army, and this determination of the council, the general said, "I can not indulge the idea that General Howe, supposing him to be going to New York, means to close the campaign, and to sit down without attempting something more. I think it highly probable, and almost certain, that he will make a descent with part of his troops into the Jerseys; and, as soon as I am satisfied that the present manoeuvre is real, and not a feint, I shall use all the means in my power to forward a part of our force to counteract his designs.

In a letter to Congress about the movement of the British army and the council's decision, the general stated, "I cannot believe that General Howe, assuming he is headed to New York, intends to end the campaign and just settle down without trying anything further. I think it’s very likely, almost certain, that he will send some of his troops into New Jersey; and as soon as I’m convinced that this current maneuver is genuine and not a trick, I will do everything I can to send part of our force to counter his plans."

"I expect the enemy will bend their force against fort Washington, and invest it immediately. From some advices, it is an object that will attract their earliest attention."

"I expect the enemy will focus their efforts on Fort Washington and lay siege to it right away. According to some information, it’s a target that will grab their immediate attention."

He also addressed a letter to the governor of New Jersey, expressing a decided opinion that General Howe would not content himself with investing fort Washington, but would invade the Jerseys; and urging him to put the militia in the best possible condition to reinforce the army, and to take the place of the new levies, who could not, he suggested, be depended on to continue in service one day longer than the first of December, the time for which they were engaged.

He also wrote a letter to the governor of New Jersey, firmly stating that General Howe wouldn’t just settle for laying siege to Fort Washington, but would likely invade New Jersey. He urged him to prepare the militia in the best possible way to support the army and to replace the new recruits, who, he suggested, couldn’t be relied on to serve even one day longer than December 1st, which was the end of their commitment.

Immediate intelligence of this movement was likewise given to General Greene, who commanded in the Jerseys; and his attention was particularly pointed to fort Washington.

Immediate notice of this movement was also given to General Greene, who was in charge in New Jersey; and he was especially directed to focus on Fort Washington.

As the British army approached Kingsbridge, three ships of war passed up the North River, notwithstanding the fire from forts Washington and Lee, and notwithstanding the additional obstructions which had been placed in the channel.

As the British army got closer to Kingsbridge, three warships moved up the North River, even with the gunfire from forts Washington and Lee, and despite the extra barriers that had been set up in the channel.

November 8.

On being informed of this, another letter was addressed to General Greene, stating that this fact was so plain a proof of the inefficacy of all the obstructions thrown in the river, as to justify a change in the dispositions which had been made. "If," continued the letter, "we can not prevent vessels from passing up, and the enemy are possessed of the surrounding country, what valuable purpose can it answer to attempt to hold a post from which the expected benefit can not be derived? I am therefore inclined to think it will not be prudent to hazard the men and stores at Mount Washington; but as you are on the spot, I leave it to you to give such orders respecting the evacuation of the place, as you may think most adviseable; and so far revoke the orders given to Colonel Magaw to defend it to the last."

On hearing this, another letter was sent to General Greene, saying that this was clear evidence of how ineffective all the obstacles put in the river were, justifying a change in the plans that had been made. "If," the letter continued, "we can't stop vessels from passing through, and the enemy controls the area around us, what good does it do to try to hold a position from which we can't gain any benefit? I think it would be unwise to risk the men and supplies at Mount Washington; but since you are there, I'll leave it up to you to decide what orders to give regarding the evacuation of the place, as you see fit; and so far, revoke the orders given to Colonel Magaw to defend it to the end."

Measures were now taken to cross the North River with the troops which had been raised on its western side, and General Washington determined to accompany that division of the army. The eastern regiments remained on the eastern side of the river, under the command of General Lee, with orders to join the Commander-in-chief, should the British army cross the Hudson.

Measures were now taken to cross the North River with the troops that had been raised on its western side, and General Washington decided to go with that division of the army. The eastern regiments stayed on the eastern side of the river, under General Lee's command, with orders to join the Commander-in-Chief if the British army crossed the Hudson.

And General Washington with a part of his army crosses the North River.

After visiting the posts about Peekskill, and making all the arrangements in his power for their defence, General Washington passed the North River in the rear of the troops designed to act in the Jerseys, and proceeded to the quarters of General Greene, near fort Lee.

After checking out the posts about Peekskill and making all the arrangements he could for their defense, General Washington crossed the North River behind the troops set to operate in New Jersey and headed to General Greene's camp near Fort Lee.

From too great a confidence[47] in the strength of fort Washington, and a conviction of its importance, General Greene had not withdrawn its garrison under the discretionary orders he had received, but still indulged a hope that the post might be maintained, or, should its situation become desperate, that means might be found to transport the troops across the river to the Jersey shore, which was defended by fort Lee.

From too much confidence[47] in the strength of Fort Washington and a belief in its importance, General Greene did not withdraw its garrison under the discretionary orders he had received. Instead, he still held out hope that the position could be maintained, or if the situation became desperate, that there would be a way to transport the troops across the river to the Jersey shore, which was defended by Fort Lee.

Mount Washington is a high piece of rocky ground, near the North River, very difficult of ascent, especially towards the north, or Kingsbridge. The fort was capable of containing about one thousand men; but the lines and out-works, which were chiefly on the southern side, towards New York, were drawn quite across the island. The ground was naturally strong, the approaches difficult, and the fortifications, though not sufficient to resist heavy artillery, were believed to be in a condition to resist any attempt to carry them by storm. The garrison consisted of troops, some of whom were among the best in the American army; and the command had been given to Colonel Magaw, a brave and intelligent officer, in whom great confidence was placed.

Mount Washington is a high rocky area near the North River that’s really hard to climb, especially from the north or Kingsbridge. The fort could hold about a thousand men, but the defenses, mainly on the southern side toward New York, stretched all the way across the island. The terrain was naturally strong, the access points were tough to navigate, and while the fortifications weren't enough to hold off heavy artillery, they were thought to be sufficient to withstand attempts to capture them by force. The garrison was made up of troops, some of whom were among the best in the American army. Colonel Magaw, a brave and smart officer whom everyone had a lot of confidence in, was in command.

November 13.

General Howe, after retiring from the White Plains, encamped at a small distance from Kingsbridge, on the heights of Fordham; and, having made the necessary preparations for an assault, summoned the garrison to surrender, on pain of being put to the sword. Colonel Magaw replied, that he should defend the place to the last extremity, and communicated the summons to General Greene at fort Lee, Fifteenth.who transmitted it to the Commander-in-chief, then at Hackensack. He immediately rode to fort Lee, and, though it was late in the night, was proceeding to fort Washington, where he expected to find Generals Putnam and Greene, when, in crossing the river, he met those officers returning from a visit to that fort. They reported that the garrison was in high spirits, and would make a good defence; on which he returned with them to fort Lee.

General Howe, after pulling back from White Plains, set up camp not far from Kingsbridge, on the heights of Fordham. Having made the necessary preparations for an attack, he demanded that the garrison surrender, threatening them with death if they didn't. Colonel Magaw responded that he would defend the location to the very end and passed the demand on to General Greene at Fort Lee, 15th. who forwarded it to the Commander-in-chief, who was then at Hackensack. He quickly rode to Fort Lee and, although it was late at night, was heading to Fort Washington, expecting to find Generals Putnam and Greene there. As he crossed the river, he encountered those officers returning from a visit to the fort. They informed him that the garrison was feeling very confident and would put up a strong defense, so he decided to go back with them to Fort Lee.

November 16.

Early next morning, Colonel Magaw posted his troops, partly on a commanding hill north of the fort, partly in the outermost of the lines drawn across the island on the south of the fort, and partly between those lines, on the woody and rocky heights fronting Haerlem River, where the ground being extremely difficult of ascent, the works were not closed. Colonel Rawlings, of Maryland, commanded on the hill towards Kingsbridge; Colonel Cadwallader, of Pennsylvania, in the lines, and Colonel Magaw himself continued in the fort.

Early the next morning, Colonel Magaw set up his troops, some on a high hill north of the fort, some in the outermost lines drawn across the island south of the fort, and some between those lines on the wooded and rocky heights facing the Harlem River, where the terrain was very difficult to climb, so the defenses weren't fully closed off. Colonel Rawlings from Maryland commanded the hill towards Kingsbridge; Colonel Cadwallader from Pennsylvania was in charge of the lines, and Colonel Magaw himself stayed in the fort.

The strength of the place had not deterred the British general from resolving to carry it by storm; and, on receiving the answer of Colonel Magaw, arrangements were made for a vigorous attack next day. About ten, the assailants appeared before the works, and moved to the assault in four different quarters. Their first division consisting of Hessians and Waldeckers, amounting to about five thousand men, under the command of General Knyphausen, advanced on the north side of the fort, against the hill occupied by Colonel Rawlings, who received them with great gallantry. The second, on the east, consisting of the British light infantry and guards, was led by Brigadier General Matthews, supported by Lord Cornwallis, at the head of the grenadiers and the thirty-third regiment. These troops crossed Haerlem River in boats, under cover of the artillery planted in the works, which had been erected on the opposite side of the river, and landed within the third line of defence which crossed the island. The third division was conducted by Lieutenant Colonel Stirling, who passed the river higher up; and the fourth by Lord Percy, accompanied by General Howe in person. This division was to attack the lines in front, on the south side.[48]

The strength of the place didn’t stop the British general from deciding to take it by storm; and, after getting Colonel Magaw’s response, plans were made for a strong attack the next day. Around ten, the attackers showed up in front of the fortifications and advanced in four different groups. The first group, made up of Hessians and Waldeckers—about five thousand men—under General Knyphausen, moved in from the north side of the fort against the hill held by Colonel Rawlings, who bravely defended his position. The second group, on the east side, included British light infantry and guards, led by Brigadier General Matthews, with Lord Cornwallis at the helm of the grenadiers and the thirty-third regiment. These troops crossed the Harlem River in boats, protected by artillery stationed in the fortifications on the other side of the river, and landed within the third line of defense that crossed the island. The third division was led by Lieutenant Colonel Stirling, who crossed the river further up; and the fourth by Lord Percy, accompanied by General Howe himself. This group was set to attack the lines directly in front, on the south side.[48]

The attacks on the north and south by General Knyphausen and Lord Percy, were made about the same instant, on Colonels Rawlings and Cadwallader, who maintained their ground for a considerable time; but, while Colonel Cadwallader was engaged in the first line against Lord Percy, the second and third divisions which had crossed Haerlem River made good their landing, and dispersed the troops fronting that river, as well as a detachment sent by Colonel Cadwallader to support them. Thus being overpowered, and the British advancing between the fort and the lines, it became necessary to abandon them. In retreating to the fort, some of the men were intercepted by the division under Colonel Stirling, and made prisoners.

The attacks from the north and south by General Knyphausen and Lord Percy happened at almost the same time, targeting Colonels Rawlings and Cadwallader, who held their position for quite a while. However, while Colonel Cadwallader was fighting against Lord Percy in the front line, the second and third divisions that had crossed the Harlem River successfully landed and scattered the troops facing that river, along with a unit sent by Colonel Cadwallader to assist them. Being outmatched, and with the British moving in between the fort and the lines, it became necessary to retreat from them. As they fell back to the fort, some of the soldiers were caught by Colonel Stirling's division and taken prisoner.

The resistance on the north was of longer duration. Rawlings maintained his ground with firmness, and his riflemen did vast execution. A three gun battery also played on Knyphausen with great effect. At length, the Hessian columns gained the summit of the hill; after which, Colonel Rawlings, who perceived the danger which threatened his rear, retreated under the guns of the fort.

The resistance in the north lasted longer. Rawlings held his position strongly, and his riflemen caused significant damage. A battery of three guns also targeted Knyphausen with great impact. Eventually, the Hessian columns reached the top of the hill; after that, Colonel Rawlings, realizing the danger to his rear, retreated under the protection of the fort's guns.

The lines of Fort Washington carried by the enemy, and the garrison made prisoners.

Having carried the lines, and all the strong ground adjoining them, the British general again summoned Colonel Magaw to surrender. While the capitulation was in a course of arrangement, General Washington sent him a billet, requesting him to hold out until the evening, when means should be attempted to bring off the garrison. But Magaw had proceeded too far to retreat; and it is probable the place could not have resisted an assault from so formidable a force as threatened it. The greatest difficulties had been overcome; the fort was too small to contain all the men; and their ammunition was nearly exhausted. Under these circumstances the garrison became prisoners of war.

Having taken control of the lines and all the nearby strongholds, the British general once again called on Colonel Magaw to surrender. While the terms of the surrender were being discussed, General Washington sent him a message asking him to hold on until evening, when an attempt would be made to rescue the garrison. However, Magaw had already gone too far to turn back, and it’s likely that the fort wouldn’t have been able to withstand an attack from such a powerful force. The biggest challenges had been faced; the fort was too small to hold all the men, and they were nearly out of ammunition. Given these circumstances, the garrison ended up becoming prisoners of war.

The loss on this occasion was the greatest the Americans had ever sustained. The garrison was stated by General Washington at about two thousand men. Yet, in a report published as from General Howe, the number of prisoners is said to be two thousand and six hundred, exclusive of officers. Either General Howe must have included in his report persons who were not soldiers, or General Washington must have comprehended the regulars only in his letter. The last conjecture is most probably correct. The loss of the assailants, according to Mr. Stedman, amounted to eight hundred men. This loss fell heaviest on the Germans.

The loss this time was the biggest the Americans had ever faced. General Washington reported the garrison had about two thousand men. However, a report attributed to General Howe claims there were two thousand six hundred prisoners, not including officers. Either General Howe included non-soldiers in his count, or General Washington was only referring to the regular troops in his letter. The latter assumption is probably the right one. According to Mr. Stedman, the attackers lost around eight hundred men, with the heaviest casualties among the Germans.

Evacuation of Fort Lee.
November 18.

On the surrender of fort Washington, it was determined to evacuate fort Lee; and a removal of the stores was immediately commenced. Before this operation could be completed, a detachment commanded by Lord Cornwallis, amounting to about six thousand men, crossed the North River below Dobb's ferry, and endeavoured, by a rapid march, to enclose the garrison between the North and Hackensack Rivers. An immediate retreat from that narrow neck of land had become indispensable, and was with difficulty effected. All the heavy cannon at fort Lee, except two twelve-pounders, with a considerable quantity of provisions and military stores, including three hundred tents, were lost. After crossing the Hackensack, General Washington posted his troops along the western bank of that river, but was unable to dispute its passage at the head of about three thousand effectives, exposed, without tents, in an inclement season; he was in a level country, without a single intrenching tool, among people far from being zealous in the American cause. In other respects this situation was dangerous. The Passaic, in his rear, after running several miles nearly parallel to the Hackensack, unites with that river below the ground occupied by the Americans, who were consequently still exposed to the hazard of being inclosed between two rivers.

Upon the surrender of Fort Washington, it was decided to evacuate Fort Lee, and the process of moving supplies began immediately. Before this operation could be completed, a detachment led by Lord Cornwallis, consisting of about six thousand men, crossed the North River below Dobb's Ferry and tried, through a quick march, to surround the garrison between the North and Hackensack Rivers. A swift retreat from that narrow piece of land became essential and was carried out with difficulty. All the heavy cannons at Fort Lee, except for two twelve-pounders, as well as a significant amount of provisions and military supplies, including three hundred tents, were lost. After crossing the Hackensack, General Washington positioned his troops along the western bank of that river but could not challenge its crossing with about three thousand effective soldiers who were exposed and without tents in harsh weather. They were in flat terrain, lacking any digging tools and among people who were far from enthusiastic about the American cause. Additionally, this situation was dangerous. The Passaic River, behind him, ran several miles nearly parallel to the Hackensack before joining that river below the area occupied by the Americans, leaving them at risk of being trapped between the two rivers.

November 21.
Weakness of the American army.

This gloomy state of things was not brightened by the prospect before him. In casting his eyes around, no cheering object presented itself. No confidence could be placed on receiving reinforcements from any quarter. But, in no situation could Washington despond. His exertions to collect an army, and to impede the progress of his enemy, were perseveringly continued. Understanding that Sir Guy Carleton no longer threatened Ticonderoga, he directed General Schuyler to hasten the troops of Pennsylvania and Jersey to his assistance, and ordered[49] General Lee to cross the North River, and be in readiness to join him, should the enemy continue the campaign. But, under the influence of the same fatal cause which had acted elsewhere, these armies too were melting away, and would soon be almost totally dissolved. General Mercer, who commanded a part of the flying camp stationed about Bergen, was also called in; but these troops had engaged to serve only till the 1st of December, and, like the other six months men, had already abandoned the army in great numbers. No hope existed of retaining the remnant after they should possess a legal right to be discharged; and there was not much probability of supplying their places with other militia. To New England he looked with anxious hope; and his requisitions on those states received prompt attention. Six thousand militia from Massachusetts, and a considerable body from Connecticut, were ordered to his assistance; but some delay in assembling them was unavoidable, and their march was arrested by the appearance of the enemy in their immediate neighbourhood.

This bleak situation was not improved by what lay ahead of him. As he looked around, nothing uplifting caught his eye. There was no reason to expect reinforcements from anywhere. However, Washington refused to feel hopeless. His efforts to gather an army and slow down the enemy's advance continued relentlessly. Understanding that Sir Guy Carleton no longer posed a threat to Ticonderoga, he instructed General Schuyler to hurry the troops from Pennsylvania and New Jersey to help him, and he ordered[49] General Lee to cross the North River and be ready to join him if the enemy kept pushing forward. But, under the same disastrous circumstances that affected other forces, these armies were also dwindling and would soon be nearly completely broken up. General Mercer, who led part of the flying camp stationed around Bergen, was also called in; but these troops had only committed to serve until December 1st, and like the other six-month soldiers, many had already left the army. There was little hope of keeping the remaining men once they could legally return home, and it was unlikely they could replace them with more militia. He looked to New England with nervous anticipation; his requests to those states were quickly acknowledged. Six thousand militia from Massachusetts and a significant group from Connecticut were dispatched to aid him, but some delays in gathering them were inevitable, and their movement was halted by the enemy's presence nearby.

Three thousand men, conducted by Sir Henry Clinton, who were embarked on board a fleet commanded by Sir Peter Parker, sailed late in November from New York, and, without much opposition, took possession of Newport. This invasion excited serious alarm in Massachusetts and Connecticut, and these states retained for their own defence, the militia who had been embodied at the instance of the Commander-in-chief.

Three thousand men led by Sir Henry Clinton, who were on a fleet commanded by Sir Peter Parker, set sail from New York in late November and, facing little resistance, took over Newport. This invasion raised significant concern in Massachusetts and Connecticut, prompting these states to keep the militia organized at the request of the Commander-in-Chief for their own defense.

Not intending to maintain his present position, General Washington had placed some regiments along the Hackensack to afford the semblance of defending its passage until his stores could be removed; and, with the residue of the troops, crossed the Passaic, and took post at Newark. Soon after he had marched, Major General Vaughan appeared before the new bridge over Hackensack. The American detachment which had been left in the rear, being unable to defend it, broke it down, and retired before him over the Passaic.

Not planning to stay in his current position, General Washington positioned some regiments along the Hackensack to give the appearance of defending its crossing until his supplies could be relocated. With the rest of the troops, he crossed the Passaic and set up camp in Newark. Shortly after he had marched, Major General Vaughan showed up at the new bridge over the Hackensack. The American detachment that had been left behind, unable to defend it, destroyed the bridge and retreated over the Passaic.

Ineffectual attempts to raise the militia.

Having entered the open country, General Washington determined to halt a few days on the south side of this river, make some show of resistance, and endeavour to collect such a force as would keep up the semblance of an army. His letters, not having produced such exertions as the public exigencies required, he deputed General Mifflin to the government of Pennsylvania, and Colonel Reid, his Adjutant General, to the government of New Jersey, with orders to represent the real situation of the army, and the certainty that, without great reinforcements, Philadelphia must fall into the hands of the enemy, and the state of Jersey be overrun.

Having entered the open countryside, General Washington decided to stay for a few days on the south side of this river, put up some resistance, and try to gather enough troops to maintain the appearance of an army. His letters hadn't prompted the kind of action that the public urgently needed, so he sent General Mifflin to the government of Pennsylvania and Colonel Reid, his Adjutant General, to the government of New Jersey, instructing them to convey the true situation of the army and the certainty that, without significant reinforcements, Philadelphia would fall into enemy hands and New Jersey would be overrun.

While thus endeavouring to strengthen himself with militia, he pressed General Lee to hasten his march, and cautioned him to keep high enough up the country to avoid the enemy, who, having got possession of the mail containing one of his late letters, would certainly endeavour to prevent the junction of the two armies.

While trying to strengthen his forces with militia, he urged General Lee to speed up his march and advised him to stay far enough inland to avoid the enemy, who, having obtained the mail containing one of his recent letters, would definitely try to stop the two armies from joining together.

This perilous state of things was rendered still more critical by indications of an insurrection in the county of Monmouth, in Jersey, where great numbers favoured the royal cause. In other places, too, a hostile temper was displayed, and an indisposition to farther resistance began to be manifested throughout that state. These appearances obliged him to make detachments from the militia of his army, to overawe the disaffected of Monmouth, who were on the point of assembling in force.

This dangerous situation became even more serious due to signs of an uprising in Monmouth County, New Jersey, where many people supported the royal cause. In other areas as well, there was a clear sense of hostility, and a reluctance to continue fighting started to show across the state. These signs forced him to send parts of his army’s militia to intimidate the discontented people of Monmouth, who were about to gather in large numbers.

General Washington retreats through Jersey.
November 23.

As the British army crossed the Passaic, General Washington abandoned his position behind that river; and the day Lord Cornwallis entered Newark, he retreated to Brunswick, a small village on the Raritan.

As the British army crossed the Passaic, General Washington left his position behind the river; and on the day Lord Cornwallis arrived in Newark, he retreated to Brunswick, a small town on the Raritan.

December 1.

At this place, the levies drawn from Maryland and Jersey to compose the flying camp, became entitled to their discharge. No remonstrances could detain them; and he sustained the mortification of seeing his feeble army still more enfeebled by being entirely abandoned by these troops, in the face of an advancing enemy. The Pennsylvania militia belonging to the flying camp were engaged to serve till the 1st of January. So many of them deserted, that it was deemed necessary to place guards on the roads, and ferries over the Delaware, to apprehend and send them back to camp. The Governor of New Jersey was again pressed for assistance, but it was not in his power to furnish the aid required. The well affected part of the lower country was overawed by the British army; and the militia of Morris and Sussex came out slowly and reluctantly.

At this point, the troops from Maryland and Jersey assigned to the flying camp were eligible for discharge. No objections could keep them from leaving, and he felt the embarrassment of watching his weak army become even weaker as these soldiers completely abandoned him in the face of an advancing enemy. The Pennsylvania militia in the flying camp had committed to serving until January 1st. So many of them deserted that it became necessary to set up guards on the roads and ferries across the Delaware to catch them and send them back to camp. The Governor of New Jersey was once again asked for help, but he couldn't provide the assistance that was needed. The loyal portion of the lower country was intimidated by the British army, and the militias from Morris and Sussex were coming out slowly and reluctantly.

While at Brunswick, attempts were made to retard the advance of the British army by movements indicating an intention to act on the offensive; but this feint was unavailing. Lord Cornwallis continued to press forward; and, as his advanced guards showed themselves on the opposite side of the bridge, General Washington evacuated the town, and marched through Princeton to Trenton. Directions had already been given to collect all the boats on the Delaware, from Philadelphia upwards for seventy miles, in the hope that the progress of the enemy might be stopped at this river; and that, in the mean time, reinforcements might arrive which would enable him to dispute its passage.

While in Brunswick, there were efforts to slow down the British army by making moves that suggested a plan for an offensive; however, this tactic didn't work. Lord Cornwallis kept pushing ahead, and when his advanced guards appeared on the other side of the bridge, General Washington evacuated the town and marched through Princeton to Trenton. Instructions had already been given to gather all the boats on the Delaware, from Philadelphia up to seventy miles north, hoping to stop the enemy's advance at the river; and in the meantime, reinforcements might arrive that would allow him to challenge their crossing.

December 2.

Having, with great labour, transported the few remaining military stores and baggage over the Delaware, he determined to remain as long as possible on the northern banks of that river.

Having worked hard to move the last of the military supplies and baggage across the Delaware, he decided to stay on the northern banks of the river for as long as he could.

The army which was thus pressed slowly through the Jerseys, was aided by no other cavalry than a small corps of badly mounted Connecticut militia, commanded by Major Shelden; and was almost equally destitute of artillery. Its numbers, at no time during the retreat, exceeded four thousand men, and on reaching the Delaware, was reduced to less than three thousand; of whom, not quite one thousand were militia of New Jersey. Even among the continental troops there were many whose term of service was about to expire.

The army that was under pressure slowly moved through New Jersey, supported by only a small group of poorly equipped Connecticut militia, led by Major Shelden; and it was almost entirely lacking in artillery. At no point during the retreat did its numbers exceed four thousand men, and by the time it reached the Delaware, it was down to less than three thousand; of those, not even one thousand were New Jersey militia. Even among the Continental troops, many were close to the end of their service.

Its defectiveness of numbers did not constitute its only weakness. The regulars were badly armed, worse clad, and almost destitute of tents, blankets, or utensils for dressing their food. They were composed chiefly of the garrison of fort Lee, and had been obliged to evacuate that place with too much precipitation to bring with them even those few articles of comfort and accommodation with which they had been furnished. The Commander-in-chief found himself at the head of this small band of soldiers, dispirited by their losses and fatigues, retreating almost naked and bare-footed, in the cold of November and December, before a numerous, well appointed, and victorious army, through a desponding country, much more disposed to obtain safety by submission, than to seek it by a manly resistance.

Its lack of adequate numbers wasn’t its only shortcoming. The troops were poorly armed, inadequately clothed, and nearly without tents, blankets, or cooking utensils. They were mainly made up of the garrison from Fort Lee, which had to evacuate in such a hurry that they couldn’t take even a few comfort items with them. The Commander-in-chief found himself leading this small group of soldiers, who were disheartened by their losses and exhaustion, retreating nearly naked and barefoot in the cold of November and December, against a large, well-equipped, and victorious army, through a discouraged region that was much more inclined to seek safety by surrender than to pursue it through brave resistance.

In this crisis of American affairs, a proclamation was issued by Lord and General Howe, as commissioners appointed on the part of the crown for restoring peace to America, commanding all persons assembled in arms against his majesty's government, to disband and return to their homes; and all civil officers to desist from their treasonable practices, and relinquish their usurped authority. A full pardon was offered to every person who would, within sixty days, appear before certain civil or military officers of the crown, claim the benefit of that proclamation, and testify his obedience to the laws by subscribing a declaration of his submission to the royal authority. Copies of it were dispersed through the country, after which numbers flocked in daily, to make their peace and obtain protection. The contrast between the splendid appearance of the pursuing army, and that of the ragged Americans who were flying before them, could not fail to nourish the general opinion that the contest was approaching its termination.

In this crisis of American affairs, a proclamation was issued by Lord and General Howe, who were appointed by the crown as commissioners to restore peace to America. They commanded everyone fighting against the king's government to disband and go home; they also ordered all civil officials to stop their treasonous actions and give up their seized power. A full pardon was offered to anyone who would, within sixty days, appear before certain civil or military officers of the crown, claim the benefits of that proclamation, and prove their obedience to the laws by signing a declaration of their submission to royal authority. Copies were spread throughout the country, and soon many people came forward daily to make peace and seek protection. The striking contrast between the impressive appearance of the pursuing army and the tattered Americans fleeing before them only fueled the widespread belief that the conflict was nearing its end.

Among the many valuable traits in the character of Washington, was that unyielding firmness of mind which resisted these accumulated circumstances of depression, and supported him under them. Undismayed by the dangers which surrounded him, he did not for an instant relax his exertions, nor omit any thing which could obstruct the progress of the enemy, or improve his own condition. He did not appear to despair of the public safety, but struggled against adverse fortune with the hope of yet vanquishing the difficulties which surrounded him; and constantly showed himself to his harassed and enfeebled army, with a serene, unembarrassed countenance, betraying no fears in himself, and invigorating and inspiring with confidence the bosoms of others. To this unconquerable firmness, to this perfect self-possession under the most desperate circumstances, is America, in a great degree, indebted for her independence.

Among the many valuable traits in Washington's character was his unwavering strength of mind that resisted the overwhelming challenges he faced and helped him endure. Undeterred by the dangers around him, he never relaxed his efforts or allowed anything to hinder the enemy's progress or improve his own situation. He didn’t lose hope for the public's safety but fought against his tough circumstances with the belief that he could overcome the challenges he faced. He consistently presented himself to his exhausted and weakened army with a calm, composed demeanor, showing no fear himself and boosting the confidence of those around him. To this indomitable strength and complete control in the most desperate situations, America owes a significant part of her independence.

December 5.

After removing his baggage and stores over the Delaware, and sending his sick to Philadelphia, the American General, finding that Lord Cornwallis still continued in Brunswick, detached twelve hundred men to Princeton in the hope that this appearance of advancing on the British might not only retard their progress, but cover a part of the country, and reanimate the people of Jersey.

After taking his luggage and supplies across the Delaware and sending his sick to Philadelphia, the American General, noticing that Lord Cornwallis was still in Brunswick, sent twelve hundred men to Princeton in the hope that this move to seem like they were advancing on the British would not only slow them down but also secure part of the area and boost the morale of the people in Jersey.

Some portion of this short respite from laborious service was devoted to the predominant wish of his heart,—preparations for the next campaign,—by impressing on congress a conviction of the real causes of the present calamitous state of things. However the human mind may resist the clearest theoretic reasoning, it is scarcely possible not to discern obvious and radical errors, while smarting under their destructive consequences. The abandonment of the army by whole regiments of the flying camp, in the face of an advancing and superior enemy; the impracticability of calling out the militia of Jersey and Pennsylvania in sufficient force to prevent Lord Cornwallis from overrunning the first state, or restrain him from entering the last, had it not been saved by other causes, were practical lessons on the subjects of enlistments for a short time, and a reliance on militia, which no prejudice could disregard, and which could not fail to add great weight to the remonstrances formerly made by the Commander-in-chief, which were now repeated.

Some of this short break from hard work was focused on the main desire of his heart—preparing for the next campaign—by convincing Congress of the real reasons behind the current disastrous situation. No matter how much the human mind may fight against clear theoretical reasoning, it’s almost impossible not to notice obvious and fundamental mistakes while suffering from their damaging effects. The abandonment of the army by entire regiments of the flying camp, in the face of a superior enemy; the inability to mobilize enough militia from Jersey and Pennsylvania to stop Lord Cornwallis from overrunning the first state or prevent him from entering the second, had it not been for other factors, served as practical lessons regarding short-term enlistments and reliance on militia. These realities were too significant to ignore and only added weight to the complaints previously made by the Commander-in-chief, which were now reiterated.

December 6.

The exertions of General Mifflin to raise the militia of Pennsylvania, though unavailing in the country, were successful in Philadelphia. A large proportion of the inhabitants of that city capable of bearing arms, had associated for the general defence; and, on this occasion, fifteen hundred of them marched to Trenton; to which place a German battalion was also ordered by congress. Seventh.On the arrival of these troops, General Washington commenced his march to Princeton, but was stopped by the intelligence that Lord Cornwallis, having received large reinforcements, was advancing rapidly from Brunswick by different routes, and endeavouring to gain his rear.

The efforts of General Mifflin to gather the militia of Pennsylvania, although unsuccessful in the countryside, were effective in Philadelphia. A large number of able-bodied residents of the city had come together for general defense; on this occasion, fifteen hundred of them marched to Trenton, where Congress had also ordered a German battalion. Seventh. Upon the arrival of these troops, General Washington started his march to Princeton but was halted by news that Lord Cornwallis, having received substantial reinforcements, was quickly advancing from Brunswick along different routes, trying to outflank him.

Eighth.
General Washington crosses the Delaware.

On receiving this intelligence, he crossed the Delaware, and posted his army in such a manner as to guard the fords. As his rear passed the river, the van of the British army appeared in sight. The main body took post at Trenton, and detachments were placed both above and below, while small parties, without interruption from the people of the country, reconnoitred the Delaware for a considerable distance. Danger of Philadelphia.From Bordentown below Trenton the course of the river turns westward, and forms an acute angle with its course from Philadelphia to that place; so that Lord Cornwallis might cross a considerable distance above, and be not much, if any, farther from that city than the American army.

Upon receiving this information, he crossed the Delaware and arranged his army in a way that protected the crossing points. As his rear crossed the river, the front of the British army came into view. The main force set up camp at Trenton, with detachments stationed both upstream and downstream, while small groups, unopposed by local residents, surveyed the Delaware for quite a distance. Danger in Philadelphia. From Bordentown, just below Trenton, the river turns westward, creating an acute angle with its path from Philadelphia to that location; thus, Lord Cornwallis could cross considerably further upstream and still be as close, if not closer, to the city than the American army.

The British general made some unsuccessful attempts to seize a number of boats guarded by Lord Stirling, about Coryell's Ferry; and, in order to facilitate his movements down the river, on the Jersey shore, repaired the bridges below Trenton, which had been broken down by order of General Washington. He then advanced a strong detachment to Bordentown, giving indications of an intention to cross the Delaware at the same time above and below; and either to march in two columns to Philadelphia, or completely to envelop the American army in the angle of the river. To counteract this plan, the American General stationed a few gallies to watch the movements of his enemy below, and aid in repelling any effort to pass over to the Pennsylvania shore; and made such a disposition of his little army as to guard against any attempt to force a passage above, which he believed to be the real design.

The British general tried several times to capture some boats protected by Lord Stirling near Coryell's Ferry. To help his movement down the river along the Jersey shore, he fixed the bridges below Trenton that General Washington had ordered to be destroyed. He then sent a strong group to Bordentown, indicating that he planned to cross the Delaware both above and below; and either march in two columns to Philadelphia or completely surround the American army at the river's bend. To counter this strategy, the American General stationed a few galleys to monitor the enemy's movements downstream and help stop any attempts to cross to the Pennsylvania side; he also arranged his small army to guard against any efforts to force a crossing upstream, which he believed was the true intention.

Having made his arrangements, he waited anxiously for reinforcements; and, in the meantime, sent daily parties over the river to harass the enemy, and to observe his situation.

Having made his preparations, he waited nervously for reinforcements; and in the meantime, sent groups daily across the river to annoy the enemy and to assess his situation.

The utmost exertions were made by government to raise the militia. In the hope that a respectable body of continental troops would aid these exertions, General Washington had directed General Gates, with the regulars of the northern army, and General Heath, with those at Peekskill, to march to his assistance.

The government put in a lot of effort to raise the militia. Hoping that a strong group of Continental troops would support these efforts, General Washington instructed General Gates, along with the regular troops from the Northern Army, and General Heath, with those stationed at Peekskill, to march to his aid.

Capture of General Lee.

Although General Lee had been repeatedly urged to join the Commander-in-chief, he proceeded slowly in the execution of these orders, manifesting a strong disposition to retain his separate command, and rather to hang on, and threaten the rear of the British army, than to strengthen that in its front. With this view he proposed establishing himself at Morristown. On receiving a letter from General Washington disapproving this proposition, and urging him to hasten his march, Lee still avowed a preference for his own plan, and proceeded reluctantly towards the Delaware. While passing through Morris county, at the distance of twenty miles from the British encampment, he, very incautiously, quartered under a slight guard, in a house about three miles from his army. Information of this circumstance was given by a countryman to Colonel Harcourt, at that time detached with a body of cavalry to watch his movements, who immediately formed and executed the design of seizing him. Early in the morning of the 12th of December, this officer reached Lee's quarters, who received no intimation of his danger until the house was surrounded, and he found himself a prisoner. He was carried off in triumph to the British army, where he was, for some time, treated as a deserter from the British service.

Although General Lee had been repeatedly urged to join the Commander-in-chief, he was slow to carry out these orders, showing a strong desire to keep his separate command and preferring to linger and threaten the rear of the British army rather than reinforce their front. With this in mind, he suggested setting up at Morristown. After receiving a letter from General Washington disapproving this suggestion and pushing him to hurry his march, Lee still insisted on his own plan and reluctantly began moving toward the Delaware. While traveling through Morris County, just twenty miles from the British camp, he carelessly set up camp with only a light guard in a house about three miles from his army. A local farmer told Colonel Harcourt, who was detached with a group of cavalry to monitor Lee’s movements, about this situation, and he immediately planned and executed a strategy to capture him. Early on the morning of December 12th, Harcourt reached Lee’s quarters, who had no warning of the danger until the house was surrounded and he found himself a prisoner. He was triumphantly taken to the British army, where he was treated as a deserter from the British service for some time.

This misfortune made a serious impression on all America. The confidence originally placed in General Lee had been increased by his success in the southern department, and by a belief that his opinions, during the military operations in New York, had contributed to the adoption of those judicious movements which had, in some measure, defeated the plans of General Howe in that quarter. It was also believed that he had dissented from the resolution of the council of war for maintaining forts Washington and Lee. No officer, except the Commander-in-chief, possessed, at that time, in so eminent a degree, the confidence of the army, or of the country; and his loss was, almost universally, bewailed as one of the greatest calamities which had befallen the American arms. It was regretted by no person more than by General Washington himself. He respected the merit of that eccentric veteran, and sincerely lamented his captivity.

This misfortune left a deep impact on all of America. The trust initially placed in General Lee had grown due to his success in the southern region and the belief that his insights during the military actions in New York had helped shape the effective strategies that partly thwarted General Howe's plans in that area. It was also thought that he had disagreed with the council of war's decision to hold Forts Washington and Lee. At that time, no officer, apart from the Commander-in-chief, had the same level of trust from the army and the country; his loss was widely mourned as one of the biggest tragedies for the American forces. No one felt this more than General Washington himself. He valued the abilities of that unique veteran and genuinely grieved over his capture.

General Sullivan, on whom the command of that division devolved after the capture of Lee, promptly obeyed the orders which had been directed to that officer; and, crossing the Delaware at Philipsburg, joined the Commander-in-chief. On the same day General Gates arrived with a few northern troops. By these and other reinforcements, the army was augmented to about seven thousand effective men.

General Sullivan, who took command of that division after Lee's capture, quickly followed the orders given to that officer. He crossed the Delaware at Philipsburg and joined the Commander-in-chief. On the same day, General Gates arrived with a few northern troops. With these and other reinforcements, the army size increased to about seven thousand effective men.

The British go into winter quarters.

The attempts of the British general to get possession of boats for the transportation of his army over the Delaware having failed, he gave indications of an intention to close the campaign, and to retire into winter quarters. About four thousand men were cantoned on the Delaware at Trenton, Bordentown, the White Horse, and Mount Holly; and the remaining part of the army of Jersey was distributed from that river to the Hackensack. Strong corps were posted at Princeton, Brunswick, and Elizabethtown.

The British general's efforts to secure boats for moving his army across the Delaware failed, leading him to hint at his plans to end the campaign and retreat into winter quarters. Around four thousand soldiers were stationed along the Delaware at Trenton, Bordentown, the White Horse, and Mount Holly, while the rest of the Jersey army was spread out from that river to the Hackensack. Strong units were positioned at Princeton, Brunswick, and Elizabethtown.

To intimidate the people, and thereby impede the recruiting service, was believed to be no inconsiderable inducement with General Howe, for covering so large a portion of Jersey. To counteract these views, General Washington ordered three of the regiments from Peekskill to halt at Morristown, and to unite with about eight hundred militia assembled at that place under Colonel Ford. General Maxwell was sent to take command of these troops, with orders to watch the motions of the enemy, to harass him in his marches, to give intelligence of all his movements, to keep up the spirits of the militia, and to prevent the inhabitants from going within the British lines, and taking protection.

To scare the people and make it harder to recruit, General Howe was thought to be significantly motivated to occupy a large part of Jersey. To counteract this, General Washington ordered three regiments from Peekskill to stop at Morristown and join about eight hundred militia gathered there under Colonel Ford. General Maxwell was sent to lead these troops with orders to monitor the enemy's movements, disrupt their marches, report on all their activities, keep the militia's spirits high, and stop the locals from crossing into British lines for protection.

December 20.

The short interval between this cantonment of the British troops, and the recommencement of active operations, was employed by General Washington in repeating the representations he had so often made to congress, respecting preparations for the ensuing campaign. The dangers resulting from a reliance on temporary armies had been fully exemplified; and his remonstrances on that subject were supported by that severe experience which corrects while it chastises. In the course of the campaign, he had suffered greatly from the want of cavalry, of artillery, and of engineers. His ideas on these important subjects had been already stated to congress, and were now reurged. With respect to the additional expense to be incurred by the measures recommended, he observed, "that our funds were not the only object now to be taken into consideration. The enemy, it was found, were daily gathering strength from the disaffected. This strength, like a snow ball by rolling, would increase, unless some means should be devised to check effectually the progress of their arms. Militia might possibly do it for a little while; but in a little while also, the militia of those states which were frequently called upon would not turn out at all, or would turn out with so much reluctance and sloth, as to amount to the same thing. Instance New Jersey! Witness Pennsylvania! Could any thing but the river Delaware have saved Philadelphia?

The brief time between the British troops setting up camp and the start of active operations was used by General Washington to repeat to Congress the requests he had made numerous times about preparing for the upcoming campaign. The dangers of depending on temporary armies had been clearly demonstrated; and his concerns on this matter were backed by the harsh lessons learned. During the campaign, he had suffered significantly due to a lack of cavalry, artillery, and engineers. He had already presented his ideas on these crucial issues to Congress, and was now reiterating them. Regarding the extra costs of the proposed measures, he remarked, "Our finances aren't the only thing we need to think about now. The enemy is daily gaining strength from those who are discontented. This strength will grow, like a snowball rolling down a hill, unless we find effective ways to halt their advancement. The militia might manage to hold them off for a short time, but soon, the militia from the states that are often called upon will either refuse to respond or will respond so reluctantly and lazily that it amounts to the same thing. Just look at New Jersey! Look at Pennsylvania! What could have saved Philadelphia other than the Delaware River?"

"Could any thing," he asked, "be more destructive of the recruiting business than giving ten dollars bounty for six weeks service in the militia, who come in, you can not tell how; go, you can not tell when; and act, you can not tell where; who consume your provisions, exhaust your stores, and leave you at last in a critical moment.

"Could anything," he asked, "be more harmful to the recruiting effort than offering a ten dollar bonus for just six weeks of service in the militia? These soldiers come in at random, leave at random, and act wherever they please. They eat up your supplies, use up your resources, and ultimately leave you hanging in a tough situation."

"These, sir," he added, "are the men I am to depend upon ten days hence. This is the basis upon which your cause will rest, and must for ever depend, until you get a large standing army sufficient of itself to oppose the enemy."

"These, sir," he added, "are the men I’ll be relying on in ten days. This is the foundation on which your cause will rely, and it must always depend on this, until you have a sizable standing army strong enough to take on the enemy."

 

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Washington Crossing the Delaware

Washington Crosses the Delaware

From the painting by Emanuel Leutze, in the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City.

From the painting by Emanuel Leutze, at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City.

On December 8, 1776, following his retreat across New Jersey, with the British army under Cornwallis pressing him closely, Washington transported his army of 6,000 men across the Delaware into Pennsylvania and to safety. He had seized all the boats within seventy miles, leaving Cornwallis to wait until the river froze over before he could follow.

On December 8, 1776, after his retreat through New Jersey, with the British army led by Cornwallis closing in on him, Washington moved his army of 6,000 men across the Delaware River into Pennsylvania to safety. He had taken all the boats within seventy miles, forcing Cornwallis to wait until the river froze over before he could pursue.

In recrossing the Delaware (as here depicted) to strike the British at Trenton, Washington executed the most brilliant military maneuver of his career.

When crossing back over the Delaware (as shown here) to attack the British in Trenton, Washington pulled off the most impressive military move of his life.

In his sesquicentennial address delivered at Cambridge, Massachusetts, July 3, 1925, President Coolidge related this incident which gives us Cornwallis's estimate of the importance of the Trenton victory:

In his 150th anniversary speech given at Cambridge, Massachusetts, on July 3, 1925, President Coolidge shared this story that shows Cornwallis's view on the significance of the Trenton victory:

"It is recorded that a few evenings after the surrender of Lord Cornwallis at Yorktown a banquet was given by Washington and his staff to the British commander and his staff. One likes to contemplate the sportsmanship of that function. Amiabilities and good wishes were duly exchanged, and finally Lord Cornwallis rose to present his compliments to Washington. There had been much talk of past campaigning experiences, and Cornwallis, turning to Washington, expressed the judgment that when history's verdict was made up 'the brightest garlands for your Excellency will be gathered, not from the shores of the Chesapeake, but from the banks of the Delaware.'"

"A few nights after Lord Cornwallis surrendered at Yorktown, Washington and his staff held a banquet for the British commander and his team. It’s nice to reflect on the sportsmanship of that event. They shared friendly exchanges and good wishes, and eventually, Lord Cornwallis stood up to compliment Washington. They had discussed their past campaign experiences, and Cornwallis, facing Washington, noted that when history is evaluated, 'the greatest praises for your Excellency will come not from the shores of the Chesapeake, but from the banks of the Delaware.'

 

He also hinted the idea, extremely delicate in itself, of enlarging his powers so as to enable him to act, without constant applications to congress for their sanction of measures, the immediate adoption of which was essential to the public interests. "This might," he said, "be termed an application for powers too dangerous to be trusted." He could only answer, "that desperate diseases required desperate remedies. He could with truth declare that he felt no lust for power, but wished with as much fervency as any man upon this wide extended continent, for an opportunity of turning the sword into a ploughshare; but his feelings as an officer and a man had been such as to force him to say, that no person ever had a greater choice of difficulties to contend with than himself."

He also suggested the idea, which was very sensitive, of expanding his powers so he could act without constantly needing to get approval from Congress for measures that were urgently needed for the public good. "This might," he said, "be seen as asking for powers that are too risky to trust." He could only respond, "that extreme situations need extreme solutions." He could honestly say that he had no desire for power but wanted, just as much as anyone else on this vast continent, the chance to turn swords into plowshares; however, his feelings as an officer and a person had compelled him to declare that no one had faced more tough challenges than he had.

After recapitulating the measures he had adopted, which were not within his power, and urging many other necessary arrangements, he added, "it may be thought I am going a good deal out of the line of my duty to adopt these measures, or to advise thus freely. A character to lose; an estate to forfeit; the inestimable blessing of liberty at stake; and a life devoted, must be my excuse."

After summarizing the actions he had taken, which weren't really his responsibility, and insisting on many other important arrangements, he added, "It might seem like I'm stepping far outside my role by taking these actions or giving such open advice. I have a reputation to protect, property to risk, the priceless gift of freedom on the line, and a life dedicated to this cause, so that's my justification."

The present aspect of American affairs was gloomy in the extreme. The existing army, except a few regiments, affording an effective force of about fifteen hundred men, would dissolve in a few days. New Jersey had, in a great measure, submitted; and the militia of Pennsylvania had not displayed the alacrity expected from them. General Howe would, most probably, avail himself of the ice which would soon form, and of the dissolution of the American army, to pass the Delaware and seize Philadelphia. This event was dreaded, not only on account of its intrinsic importance, but of its peculiar effect at this time, when an army was to be recruited on which the future hopes of America were to rest. It was feared, and with reason, that it would make such an impression on the public mind as to deter the American youth from engaging in a contest becoming desperate.

The current state of American affairs was extremely bleak. The existing army, except for a few regiments, offered an effective force of about fifteen hundred men, which would collapse in just a few days. New Jersey had largely surrendered; and the Pennsylvania militia had not shown the eagerness that was expected of them. General Howe would likely take advantage of the ice that would soon form and the disbandment of the American army to cross the Delaware and capture Philadelphia. This event was feared not only because of its inherent significance but also because of its particular impact at this time, when a new army was needed to support the future hopes of America. There was reasonable concern that it would leave such a mark on public sentiment that it would discourage American youth from participating in a struggle that was becoming increasingly desperate.

Impelled by these considerations, General Washington meditated a blow on the British army, while dispersed in its cantonments, which might retrieve the affairs of America in the opinion of the public, and recover the ground that had been lost.

Driven by these thoughts, General Washington planned an attack on the British army, which was scattered in its camps, aiming to improve America’s situation in the eyes of the public and regain the lost territory.

He formed the daring plan of attacking all the British posts on the Delaware at the same instant. If successful in all, or any of these attacks, he hoped not only to wipe off the impression made by his losses, and by his retreat, but also to relieve Philadelphia from immediate danger, and to compel his adversary to compress himself in such a manner as no longer to cover the Jerseys.

He came up with a bold plan to attack all the British positions on the Delaware at the same time. If he succeeded in any of these attacks, he hoped not only to erase the negative impression from his losses and retreat but also to free Philadelphia from immediate threat and force his enemy to tighten their grip, preventing them from covering New Jersey anymore.

The positions taken to guard the river were equally well adapted to offensive operations.

The positions set up to guard the river were also well-suited for launching attacks.

The regulars were posted above Trenton from Yardley's up to Coryell's Ferry. The Pennsylvania flying camp, and Jersey militia, under the command of General Irvine, extended from Yardley's to the ferry opposite Bordentown; and General Cadwallader with the Pennsylvania militia lay still lower down the river.

The regulars were stationed above Trenton from Yardley's to Coryell's Ferry. The Pennsylvania flying camp and Jersey militia, led by General Irvine, stretched from Yardley's to the ferry across from Bordentown; and General Cadwallader with the Pennsylvania militia was positioned further down the river.

In the plan of attack which had been digested, it was proposed to cross in the night at M'Konkey's Ferry, about nine miles above Trenton; to march down in two divisions, the one taking the river road, and the other the Pennington road, both which lead into the town; the first, towards that part of the western side which approaches the river, and the last towards the north. This part of the plan was to be executed by the General in person, at the head of about two thousand four hundred continental troops. It was thought practicable to pass them over the river by twelve, and to reach the point of destination by five in the morning of the next day, when the attack was to be made. General Irvine was directed to cross at the Trenton Ferry, and to secure the bridge below the town, in order to prevent the escape of the enemy by that road. General Cadwallader was to pass over at Dunk's Ferry, and carry the post at Mount Holly. It had been in contemplation to unite the troops employed in fortifying Philadelphia, to those at Bristol, and to place the whole under General Putnam; but such indications were given in that city of an insurrection of the royal cause, that this part of the plan was abandoned. The cold on the night of the 25th was very severe. Snow, mingled with hail and rain, fell in great quantities, and so much ice was made in the river that, with every possible exertion, the division conducted by the General in person could not effect its passage until three, nor commence its march down the river till near four. As the distance to Trenton by either road is nearly the same, orders were given to attack at the instant of arrival, and, after driving in the out-guards, to press rapidly after them into the town, and prevent the main body from forming.

In the attack plan that had been developed, it was suggested to cross the river at M'Konkey's Ferry during the night, about nine miles north of Trenton. The troops would march down in two groups, one on the river road and the other on the Pennington road, both leading into the town; the first group would approach the western side near the river, and the second would come from the north. This part of the plan was to be carried out by the General himself, leading around two thousand four hundred Continental troops. It was deemed feasible to get them across the river by twelve and reach their destination by five in the morning the next day when the attack was scheduled. General Irvine was instructed to cross at the Trenton Ferry and secure the bridge below the town to block the enemy's escape on that route. General Cadwallader was to cross at Dunk's Ferry and take the post at Mount Holly. There had been plans to combine the troops fortifying Philadelphia with those at Bristol and to place the whole force under General Putnam. However, due to signs of a royalist uprising in the city, that part of the plan was scrapped. The cold on the night of the 25th was intense. Heavy snow, mixed with hail and rain, fell in large amounts, and so much ice formed in the river that despite all efforts, the division led by the General could not cross until three and could not begin their march down the river until almost four. Since the distance to Trenton was roughly the same by either route, orders were given to attack as soon as they arrived, and after pushing back the out-guards, to quickly move into the town and stop the main enemy force from assembling.

Battle of Trenton.
December 26.

General Washington accompanied the upper column, and arriving at the out-post on that road, precisely at eight, drove it in, and, in three minutes, heard the fire from the column which had taken the river road. The picket guard attempted to keep up a fire while retreating, but was pursued with such ardour as to be unable to make a stand. Colonel Rawle, who commanded in the town, paraded his men, and met the assailants. In the commencement of the action, he was mortally wounded, upon which the troops, in apparent confusion, attempted to gain the road to Princeton. General Washington threw a detachment into their front, while he advanced rapidly on them in person. Finding themselves surrounded, and their artillery already seized, they laid down their arms, and surrendered themselves prisoners of war. About twenty of the enemy were killed, and about one thousand made prisoners. Six field pieces, and a thousand stand of small arms were also taken. On the part of the Americans, two privates were killed; two frozen to death; and one officer, Lieutenant Monroe,[50] of the third Virginia regiment, and three or four privates wounded.

General Washington led the upper column and arrived at the outpost on that road exactly at eight. He pushed it back, and within three minutes, he heard the gunfire from the column that had taken the river road. The picket guard tried to maintain fire while retreating but was chased so vigorously that they couldn’t hold their ground. Colonel Rawle, who was in charge in the town, lined up his men to confront the attackers. At the start of the battle, he was mortally wounded, which caused his troops to panic and attempt to escape to the road to Princeton. General Washington sent a unit to block their path while he advanced on them himself. Realizing they were surrounded, and with their artillery already captured, they laid down their arms and surrendered as prisoners of war. About twenty enemy soldiers were killed, and around one thousand were taken prisoner. Six field pieces and a thousand rifles were also captured. On the American side, two privates were killed, two froze to death, and one officer, Lieutenant Monroe,[50] of the third Virginia regiment, along with three or four privates, were wounded.

Unfortunately, the ice rendered it impracticable for General Irvine to execute that part of the plan which was allotted to him. With his utmost efforts, he was unable to cross the river; and the road towards Bordentown remained open. About five hundred men, among whom was a troop of cavalry, stationed in the lower end of Trenton, availed themselves of this circumstance, and crossing the bridge in the commencement of the action, escaped down the river. The same cause prevented General Cadwallader from attacking the post at Mount Holly. With great difficulty a part of his infantry passed the river, but returned on its being found absolutely impracticable to cross with the artillery.

Unfortunately, the ice made it impossible for General Irvine to carry out his assigned part of the plan. Despite his best efforts, he couldn't cross the river, leaving the road to Bordentown open. About five hundred men, including a cavalry troop stationed at the lower end of Trenton, took advantage of this situation and crossed the bridge at the start of the action, escaping down the river. The same issue prevented General Cadwallader from launching an attack on the post at Mount Holly. With great difficulty, some of his infantry managed to get across the river, but they had to turn back when it became clear that crossing with the artillery was completely unfeasible.

Although this plan failed in so many of its parts, the success attending that which was conducted by General Washington in person was followed by the happiest effects.

Although this plan failed in many ways, the success of the one led by General Washington himself had the most positive outcomes.

Had it been practicable for the divisions under Generals Irvine and Cadwallader to cross the river, it was intended to proceed from Trenton to the posts at and about Bordentown, to sweep the British from the banks of the Delaware,[51] and to maintain a position in the Jerseys. But finding that those parts of the plan had failed, and supposing the British to remain in force below, while a strong corps was posted at Princeton, General Washington thought it unadviseable to hazard the loss of the very important advantage already gained, by attempting to increase it, and recrossed the river with his prisoners and military stores. Lieutenant Colonel Baylor, his aid-de-camp, who carried the intelligence of this success to congress, was presented with a horse completely caparisoned for service, and recommended to the command of a regiment of cavalry.

If it had been feasible for the divisions under Generals Irvine and Cadwallader to cross the river, they planned to move from Trenton to the posts in and around Bordentown, to drive the British from the banks of the Delaware,[51] and to hold a position in New Jersey. However, when they realized that those parts of the plan had failed, and assuming the British remained strong below while a large unit was stationed at Princeton, General Washington decided it was unwise to risk losing the significant advantage they had already gained by trying to expand it. He recrossed the river with his prisoners and military supplies. Lieutenant Colonel Baylor, his aide-de-camp, who reported this success to Congress, received a fully equipped horse for service and was recommended to lead a cavalry regiment.

Nothing could surpass the astonishment of the British commander at this unexpected display of vigour on the part of the American General. His condition, and that of his country, had been thought desperate. He had been deserted by all the troops having a legal right to leave him; and, to render his situation completely ruinous, nearly two-thirds of the continental soldiers still remaining with him, would be entitled to their discharge on the first day of January. There appeared to be no probability of prevailing on them to continue longer in the service, and the recruiting business was absolutely at an end. The spirits of a large proportion of the people were sunk to the lowest point of depression. New Jersey appeared to be completely subdued; and some of the best judges of the public sentiment were of opinion that immense numbers in Pennsylvania, also, were determined not to permit the sixty days allowed in the proclamation of Lord and Sir William Howe, to elapse, without availing themselves of the pardon it proffered. Instead of offensive operations, the total dispersion of the small remnant of the American army was to be expected, since it would be rendered too feeble by the discharge of those engaged only until the last day of December, to attempt, any longer, the defence of the Delaware, which would by that time, in all probability, be passable on the ice. While every appearance supported these opinions, and the British General, without being sanguine, might well consider the war as approaching its termination, this bold and fortunate enterprise announced to him, that he was contending with an adversary who could never cease to be formidable while the possibility of resistance remained. Finding the conquest of America more distant than had been supposed, he determined, in the depth of winter to recommence active operations; and Lord Cornwallis, who had retired to New York with the intention of embarking for Europe, suspended his departure, and returned to the Jerseys in great force, for the purpose of regaining the ground which had been lost.

Nothing could match the surprise of the British commander at this unexpected show of energy from the American General. His situation, and that of his country, had seemed hopeless. He had been abandoned by all of the troops who had the right to leave him; and to make matters worse, nearly two-thirds of the continental soldiers still with him were set to be discharged on the first day of January. There seemed to be no chance of convincing them to stay in service any longer, and recruitment was completely stalled. The morale of a large portion of the population had sunk to an all-time low. New Jersey seemed to be entirely subdued; and some of the best observers of public sentiment believed that huge numbers in Pennsylvania were also set on taking advantage of the pardon offered in Lord and Sir William Howe's proclamation before the sixty days were up. Rather than planning offensive actions, it was expected that the small remnants of the American army would completely disperse, as they would be too weakened by the discharge of those who had signed on only until the last day of December to continue defending the Delaware, which by then would likely be crossable on the ice. While every indication supported these views, and the British General, without being overly optimistic, could reasonably consider the war nearing its end, this bold and fortunate maneuver revealed to him that he was facing an opponent who would never stop being a threat as long as the possibility of resistance existed. Realizing that conquering America was further away than he had thought, he decided to resume active operations in the depths of winter; and Lord Cornwallis, who had retreated to New York with plans to sail for Europe, delayed his departure and returned to New Jersey with a strong force to recover lost ground.

Meanwhile, Count Donop, who commanded the troops below Trenton, on hearing the disaster which had befallen Colonel Rawle, retreated by the road leading to Amboy, and joined General Leslie at Princeton. The next day, General Cadwallader crossed the Delaware, with orders to harass the enemy, but to put nothing to hazard until he should be joined by the continental battalions, who were allowed a day or two of repose, after the fatigues of the enterprise against Trenton. General Mifflin joined General Irvine with about fifteen hundred Pennsylvania militia, and those troops also crossed the river.

Meanwhile, Count Donop, who was in charge of the troops below Trenton, learned about the disaster that had struck Colonel Rawle and retreated along the road to Amboy, where he joined General Leslie in Princeton. The next day, General Cadwallader crossed the Delaware with orders to annoy the enemy but not to take any risks until he was joined by the Continental battalions, which were given a day or two to rest after the exhausting mission in Trenton. General Mifflin linked up with General Irvine, bringing about fifteen hundred Pennsylvania militia, and those troops also crossed the river.

Finding himself once more at the head of a force with which it seemed practicable to act offensively, the General determined to employ the winter in endeavouring to recover Jersey.

Finding himself once again in charge of a force that seemed capable of taking offensive action, the General decided to use the winter to try to recapture Jersey.

December 30.

With this view, he ordered General Heath to leave a small detachment at Peekskill, and with the main body of the New England militia, to enter Jersey, and approach the British cantonments on that side. General Maxwell was ordered, with all the militia he could collect, to harass their flank and rear, and to attack their out-posts on every favourable occasion, while the continental troops, led by himself, recrossed the Delaware, and took post at Trenton. On the last day of December, the regulars of New England were entitled to a discharge. With great difficulty, and a bounty of ten dollars, many of them were induced to renew their engagements for six weeks.

With this in mind, he instructed General Heath to leave a small group at Peekskill and, with the main forces of the New England militia, to move into New Jersey and get closer to the British camps on that side. General Maxwell was tasked with gathering all the militia he could to disrupt their flank and rear, and to attack their outposts whenever possible, while the Continental troops, led by him, crossed back over the Delaware and set up camp at Trenton. On the last day of December, the regular troops from New England were due for discharge. With great difficulty and a ten-dollar bonus, many of them were persuaded to extend their service for another six weeks.

1777
January 1.

The British were now collected in force at Princeton under Lord Cornwallis; and appearances confirmed the intelligence, secretly[52] obtained, that he intended to attack the American army.

The British had gathered in strength at Princeton under Lord Cornwallis, and the situation confirmed the information that had been secretly[52] received, indicating that he planned to attack the American army.

Generals Mifflin and Cadwallader, who lay at Bordentown and Crosswix, with three thousand six hundred militia, were therefore ordered to join the Commander-in-chief, whose whole effective force, with this addition, did not exceed five thousand men.

Generals Mifflin and Cadwallader, who were stationed at Bordentown and Crosswix with three thousand six hundred militia, were ordered to join the Commander-in-chief, whose total active force, including this addition, did not exceed five thousand men.

January 2.

Lord Cornwallis advanced upon him the next morning; and about four in the afternoon, the van of the British army reached Trenton. On its approach, General Washington retired across the Assumpinck, a creek which runs through the town. The British attempted to cross the creek at several places, but finding all the fords guarded, they desisted from the attempt, and kindled their fires. The Americans kindled their fires likewise; and a cannonade was kept up on both sides till dark.

Lord Cornwallis moved against him the next morning, and around four in the afternoon, the front of the British army arrived in Trenton. As they approached, General Washington retreated across the Assumpinck, a creek that runs through the town. The British tried to cross the creek at several points, but finding all the fords watched, they gave up and started their fires. The Americans also built their fires, and both sides exchanged cannon fire until nightfall.

The situation of General Washington was again extremely critical. Should he maintain his position, he would certainly be attacked next morning, by a force so very superior, as to render the destruction of his little army inevitable. Should he attempt to retreat over the Delaware, the passage of that river had been rendered so difficult by a few mild and foggy days which had softened the ice, that a total defeat would be hazarded. In any event, the Jerseys would, once more, be entirely in possession of the enemy; the public mind again be depressed; recruiting discouraged; and Philadelphia, a second time, in the grasp of General Howe.

The situation for General Washington was once again extremely critical. If he held his position, he would definitely be attacked the next morning by a force that was much stronger, making the destruction of his small army unavoidable. If he tried to retreat across the Delaware, the recent mild and foggy days had softened the ice, making the crossing very difficult and risking a complete defeat. Either way, the Jerseys would once again be completely under enemy control; the public morale would be low again; recruitment efforts would be discouraged; and Philadelphia would be once again in General Howe's hands.

In this embarrassing state of things, he formed the bold design of abandoning the Delaware, and marching, by a circuitous route, along the left flank of the British army, into its rear, at Princeton, where its strength could not be great; and, after beating the troops at that place, to move rapidly to Brunswick, where the baggage and principal magazines of the army lay under a weak guard. He indulged the hope that this manoeuvre would call the attention of the British general to his own defence. Should Lord Cornwallis, contrary to every reasonable calculation, proceed to Philadelphia, nothing worse could happen in that quarter, than must happen should the American army be driven before him; and some compensation for that calamity would be obtained by expelling the enemy completely from Jersey, and cutting up, in detail, all his parties in that state.

In this awkward situation, he came up with a bold plan to leave the Delaware behind and take a roundabout route along the left side of the British army to hit them from behind in Princeton, where their numbers wouldn’t be as strong. After defeating the troops there, he aimed to quickly move to Brunswick, where the army’s supplies and main storage were protected by a weak guard. He hoped this move would force the British general to focus on his own defense. If Lord Cornwallis, against all expectations, went to Philadelphia, nothing worse could happen there than what would occur if the American army was pushed back. He thought that some benefit could come from completely driving the enemy out of New Jersey and taking down their smaller units in the area.

January 3.
Of Princeton.

This plan being approved by a council of war, preparations were made for its immediate execution. As soon as it was dark, the baggage was removed silently to Burlington; and, about one in the morning, after renewing their fires, and leaving their guards to go the rounds as usual; the army decamped with perfect silence, and took a circuitous route along the Quaker road to Princeton, where three British regiments had encamped the preceding night, two of which commenced their march early in the morning to join the rear of their army at Maidenhead. At sunrise, when they had proceeded about two miles, they saw the Americans on their left, advancing in a direction which would enter the road in their rear. They immediately faced about, and, repassing Stony Brook, moved under cover of a copse of wood towards the American van, which was conducted by General Mercer. A sharp action ensued, which, however, was not of long duration. The militia, of which the advanced party was principally composed, soon gave way; and the few regulars attached to them were not strong enough to maintain their ground. While exerting himself gallantly to rally his broken troops, General Mercer was mortally wounded, and the van was entirely routed. But the fortune of the day was soon changed. The main body, led by General Washington in person, followed close in the rear, and attacked the British with great spirit. Persuaded that defeat would irretrievably ruin the affairs of America, he advanced in the very front of danger, and exposed himself to the hottest fire of the enemy. He was so well supported by the same troops who, a few days before, had saved their country at Trenton, that the British, in turn, were compelled to give way. Their line was broken, and the two regiments separated from each other. Colonel Mawhood, who commanded that in front, and was, consequently, nearest the rear division of the army, under Lord Cornwallis, retired to the main road, and continued his march to Maidenhead. The fifty-fifth regiment, which was on the left, being hard pressed, fled in confusion across the fields into a back road, leading between Hillsborough and Kingston towards Brunswick. The vicinity of the British forces at Maidenhead secured Colonel Mawhood, and General Washington pressed forward to Princeton. The regiment remaining in that place took post in the college, and made a show of resistance; but some pieces of artillery being brought up to play upon that building, it was abandoned, and the greater part of them became prisoners. A few saved themselves by a precipitate flight to Brunswick.

This plan was approved by a war council, and preparations were made for its immediate execution. As soon as it got dark, the baggage was quietly moved to Burlington; and around one in the morning, after rekindling their fires and leaving their guards to patrol as usual, the army quietly departed and took a long route along the Quaker road to Princeton, where three British regiments had camped the night before. Two of these regiments started their march early in the morning to join the rear of their army at Maidenhead. At sunrise, after they had traveled about two miles, they spotted the Americans to their left, advancing in a way that would let them enter the road behind. They quickly turned around, and, crossing Stony Brook, made their way under the cover of a thicket toward the American front, which was led by General Mercer. A fierce battle broke out, but it didn’t last long. The militia, which was primarily made up of the advanced party, soon fell apart; and the few regulars with them weren’t strong enough to hold their position. While bravely trying to rally his scattered troops, General Mercer was mortally wounded, and the front was completely defeated. But the tide of the day quickly turned. The main body, led by General Washington himself, followed closely behind and attacked the British with great intensity. Believing that defeat would devastate America’s cause, he moved right to the front lines and exposed himself to the worst of the enemy's fire. He was well supported by the same troops who, just days earlier, had saved their country at Trenton, forcing the British to retreat. Their formation broke, and the two regiments became separated. Colonel Mawhood, who was in command of the front regiment and was therefore closest to the rear division of the army led by Lord Cornwallis, withdrew to the main road and continued his march to Maidenhead. The fifty-fifth regiment on the left, feeling pressure, fled chaotically across the fields into a side road heading between Hillsborough and Kingston toward Brunswick. The presence of British forces at Maidenhead provided security for Colonel Mawhood, while General Washington advanced on Princeton. The regiment that remained there took position in the college and put up a show of resistance; however, after some artillery was brought up to target the building, it was abandoned, and most of them became prisoners. A few managed to escape through a hurried flight to Brunswick.

In this engagement, rather more than one hundred British were killed in the field, and near three hundred were taken prisoners. The loss of the Americans, in killed, was somewhat less, but in their number was included General Mercer, a valuable officer, who had served with the Commander-in-chief during his early campaigns in Virginia, and was greatly esteemed by him. Colonels Haslet and Potter, Captain Neal of the artillery, Captain Fleming, and five other valuable officers, were also among the slain.

In this battle, over one hundred British soldiers were killed in action, and nearly three hundred were captured. The American casualties were somewhat lower, but included General Mercer, a valuable officer who had served with the Commander-in-chief during his early campaigns in Virginia and was highly regarded by him. Colonels Haslet and Potter, Captain Neal of the artillery, Captain Fleming, and five other important officers were also among the dead.

On the return of day-light, Lord Cornwallis discovered that the American army had decamped in the night; and immediately conceived the whole plan. Alarmed at the danger which threatened Brunswick, he marched with the utmost expedition for that place, and was close in the rear of the American army before it could leave Princeton.

On the return of daylight, Lord Cornwallis found that the American army had left during the night; and he quickly figured out the entire plan. Concerned about the threat to Brunswick, he rushed to that location and was right behind the American army before it could depart Princeton.

The situation of General Washington was again perilous in the extreme. His small army was exhausted with fatigue. His troops had been without sleep, all of them one night, and some of them, two. They were without blankets, many of them were bare-footed and otherwise thinly clad, and were eighteen miles from his place of destination. He was closely pursued by a superior enemy who must necessarily come up with him before he could accomplish his designs on Brunswick. Under these circumstances he abandoned the remaining part of his original plan, and took the road leading up the country to Pluckemin, where his troops were permitted to refresh themselves. Lord Cornwallis continued his march to Brunswick, which he reached in the course of that night.

The situation for General Washington was extremely dangerous again. His small army was worn out from fatigue. They hadn’t slept the night before, and some hadn’t slept for two nights. They were without blankets, many were barefoot and otherwise poorly dressed, and they were eighteen miles from their destination. A stronger enemy was chasing them closely and would likely catch up before Washington could carry out his plans for Brunswick. Given these circumstances, he gave up the remaining part of his original plan and took the route upcountry to Pluckemin, where his troops could rest. Lord Cornwallis continued his march to Brunswick, arriving there later that night.

The sufferings of the American soldiers had been so great from the severity of the season, and the very active service in which they had been engaged; their complaints, especially on the part of the militia, were so loud; their numbers were reducing so fast by returning home, and by sickness; that General Washington found it impracticable to continue offensive operations. He retired to Morristown, in order to put his men under cover, and to give them some repose.

The hardships faced by the American soldiers were intense due to the harsh weather and the demanding missions they had undertaken. Their complaints, particularly from the militia, were increasingly vocal; their numbers were dwindling rapidly as they returned home and fell ill. As a result, General Washington found it impossible to maintain offensive operations. He retreated to Morristown to shelter his men and allow them some rest.

The bold, judicious, and unexpected attacks made at Trenton and Princeton, had a much more extensive influence than would be supposed from a mere estimate of the killed and taken. They saved Philadelphia for the winter; recovered the state of Jersey; and, which was of still more importance, revived the drooping spirits of the people, and gave a perceptible impulse to the recruiting service throughout the United States.

The bold, smart, and surprising attacks at Trenton and Princeton had a far greater impact than one might think just from looking at the number of casualties and captures. They saved Philadelphia for the winter, regained control of New Jersey, and, even more importantly, lifted the spirits of the people and gave a noticeable boost to recruitment efforts across the United States.

The problem, that a nation can be defended against a permanent force, by temporary armies, by occasional calls of the husbandman from his plough to the field, was completely disproved; and, in demonstrating its fallacy, the independence of America had nearly perished in its cradle. The utmost efforts were now directed to the creation of an army for the ensuing campaign, as the only solid basis on which the hopes of the patriot could rest. During the retreat through the Jerseys, and while the expectation prevailed that no effectual resistance could be made to the British armies, some spirited men indeed were animated to greater and more determined exertions; but this state of things produced a very different effect on the great mass, which can alone furnish the solid force of armies. In the middle states especially, the panic of distrust was perceived. Doubts concerning the issue of the contest became extensive; and the recruiting service proceeded so heavily and slowly as to excite the most anxious solicitude for the future.

The idea that a nation could defend itself against a constant threat with temporary armies, calling farmers away from their plows when needed, was completely shown to be false; in proving this wrong, America's independence almost failed before it even began. All efforts were now focused on building an army for the upcoming campaign, as it was the only real foundation for the hopes of the patriots. During the retreat through New Jersey, as everyone thought that effective resistance against the British armies was impossible, some motivated men indeed stepped up and worked harder. But this situation had a very different effect on the larger group, which is necessary to form a solid army. In the middle states especially, a widespread panic and distrust were felt. Doubts about the outcome of the conflict grew, and the recruiting process moved so slowly that it created deep concern for the future.

The affairs of Trenton and Princeton were magnified into great victories; and were believed by the body of the people to evidence the superiority of their army and of their general. The opinion that they were engaged in hopeless contest, yielded to a confidence that proper exertions would ensure ultimate success.

The events at Trenton and Princeton were blown out of proportion into major victories; and the general public came to see them as proof of the strength of their army and their general. The belief that they were in a losing battle shifted to a conviction that with the right effort, they would eventually succeed.

This change of opinion was accompanied with an essential change of conduct; and, although the regiments required by congress were not completed, they were made much stronger than was believed to be possible before this happy revolution in the aspect of public affairs.

This change of opinion came with a significant change in behavior; and, although the regiments requested by Congress were not fully formed, they were made much stronger than anyone thought possible before this positive shift in public affairs.

Firmness of Congress.

The firmness of congress throughout the gloomy and trying period which intervened between the loss of fort Washington and the battle of Princeton, gives the members of that time a just claim to the admiration of the world, and to the gratitude of their fellow citizens. Undismayed by impending dangers, they did not, for an instant, admit the idea of surrendering the independence they had declared, and purchasing peace by returning to their colonial situation. As the British army advanced through Jersey, and the consequent insecurity of Philadelphia rendered an adjournment from that place a necessary measure of precaution, their exertions seemed to increase with their difficulties. They sought to remove the despondence which was seizing and paralyzing the public mind, by an address to the states, in which every argument was suggested which could rouse them to vigorous action. They made the most strenuous efforts to animate the militia, and impel them to the field, by the agency of those whose popular eloquence best fitted them for such a service.

The determination of Congress during the dark and challenging period between the loss of Fort Washington and the Battle of Princeton deserves the admiration of the world and the gratitude of their fellow citizens. Unfazed by emerging threats, they never entertained the idea of giving up the independence they had declared or buying peace by reverting to colonial status. As the British army moved through New Jersey, and the growing insecurity in Philadelphia made leaving that place a necessary precaution, their efforts seemed to intensify alongside their challenges. They aimed to counter the despair gripping the public by addressing the states, presenting every argument possible to inspire them to take decisive action. They worked hard to motivate the militia and get them into the field, using those whose persuasive speaking skills were best suited for the task.

1776
December 20.

When reassembled at Baltimore, the place to which they had adjourned, their resolutions exhibited no evidence of confusion or dismay; and the most judicious efforts were made to repair the mischief produced by past errors.

When they got back together in Baltimore, the place where they had moved to, their resolutions showed no signs of confusion or distress; and the most careful efforts were made to fix the damage caused by previous mistakes.

Declaring that, in the present state of things, the very existence of civil liberty depended on the right execution of military powers, December 27.to a vigorous direction of which, distant, numerous, and deliberative bodies were unequal, they authorized General Washington to raise sixteen additional regiments, and conferred upon him, for six months, almost unlimited powers for the conduct of the war.

Declaring that, given the current situation, the very existence of civil liberty relied on the effective use of military power, December 27th. which distant, large, and deliberative groups were not capable of managing, they authorized General Washington to raise sixteen more regiments and granted him, for six months, nearly unlimited authority to conduct the war.

Towards the close of 1776, while the tide of fortune was running strongest against them, some few members, distrusting their ability to make a successful resistance, proposed to authorize their commissioners at the court of Versailles to transfer to France the same monopoly of their trade which Great Britain had possessed.[53] This proposition is stated to have been relinquished, because it was believed that concessions of this kind would impair many arguments which had been used in favour of independence, and disunite the people. It was next proposed to offer a monopoly of certain enumerated articles; but the unequal operation of this measure gave to the proposition a speedy negative. Some proposed offering to France an offensive and defensive league; but this also was rejected. The more enlightened members argued that, though the friendship of small states might be purchased, that of France could not. They alleged that, if she would risk a war with Great Britain by openly espousing their cause, she would not be induced to that measure by the prospect of direct advantages, so much as by a desire to lessen the overgrown power of a dangerous rival.[54] It was therefore urged that the most certain means of influencing France to interfere, was an assurance that the United States were determined to persevere in refusing to resume their former allegiance. Under the influence of this better opinion, resolutions were again entered into, directing their commissioners in Europe to give explicit assurances of their determination at all events to maintain their independence. Copies of these resolutions were sent to the principal courts of Europe; and agents were appointed to solicit their friendship to the new formed states.[55] These despatches fell into the hands of the British, and were published by them; a circumstance which promoted the views of congress, who were persuaded that an apprehension of their coming to an accommodation with Great Britain constituted a material objection to the interference of foreign courts, in what was represented as merely a domestic quarrel. A resolution adopted in the deepest distress, to listen to no terms of reunion with their parent state, would, it was believed, convince those who wished for the dismemberment of the British empire, that sound policy required their interference so far as to prevent the conquest of the United States.

Towards the end of 1776, while things seemed to be going very badly for them, a few members, doubting their ability to effectively resist, suggested giving their commissioners in France the power to transfer to France the same trade monopoly that Great Britain had. This idea was set aside because it was thought that such concessions would weaken many arguments being made for independence and divide the people. Then, it was suggested to offer a monopoly on certain listed items, but the unfair impact of this proposal quickly led to its rejection. Some suggested offering France a military alliance, but that was also turned down. The more informed members argued that while the loyalty of small countries might be bought, France's could not. They claimed that if France was willing to risk a war with Great Britain by supporting their cause, it would not be motivated by the prospect of immediate benefits, but rather by a desire to reduce the significant power of a dangerous rival. It was therefore emphasized that the best way to encourage France to get involved was to assure them that the United States was set on refusing to return to their old loyalty. Influenced by this more optimistic viewpoint, new resolutions were passed, instructing their commissioners in Europe to clearly communicate their commitment to maintaining their independence at all costs. Copies of these resolutions were sent to major courts in Europe; and agents were appointed to seek their support for the newly formed states. These communications were intercepted by the British and made public, which actually helped Congress’ aims, as they believed that the fear of the colonies reaching some agreement with Great Britain was a key reason for foreign courts not wanting to get involved in what was portrayed as merely a domestic issue. A resolution made during their deepest troubles, to reject any terms for reunion with Britain, was thought to convince those who wanted to see the British empire break apart that good policy required their intervention to prevent the conquest of the United States.


CHAPTER VII.

American army inoculated.... General Heath moves to Kingsbridge.... Returns to Peekskill.... Destruction of stores at Peekskill.... At Danbury.... Expedition to Sagg Harbour.... Camp formed at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Attempts to cut off the retreat of the American army to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis skirmishes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescot surprised and taken.... The British army embarks.

The American army gets vaccinated.... General Heath heads to Kingsbridge.... Comes back to Peekskill.... Destruction of supplies at Peekskill.... Over at Danbury.... Mission to Sagg Harbour.... Camp set up at Middlebrook.... Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House.... Returns to Amboy.... Tries to block the American army's retreat to Middlebrook.... Lord Cornwallis clashes with Lord Stirling.... General Prescot gets caught off guard and captured.... The British army boards their ships.

 

1777

The effect of the proclamation published by Lord and General Howe on taking possession of New Jersey, was, in a great degree, counteracted by the conduct of the invading army. Fortunately for the United States, the hope that security was attainable by submission, was soon dissipated. Whatever may have been the exertions of their General to restrain his soldiers, they still considered and treated the inhabitants rather as conquered rebels than returning friends. Indulging in every species of licentiousness, the plunder and destruction of property were among the least offensive of the injuries they inflicted. The persons, not only of the men, but of that sex through which indignities least to be forgiven, and longest to be remembered, are received, were exposed to the most irritating outrage. Nor were these excesses confined to those who had been active in the American cause. The lukewarm, and even the loyalists, were the victims of this indiscriminating spirit of rapine and violence.

The impact of the announcement made by Lord and General Howe about taking control of New Jersey was largely offset by the behavior of the invading army. Luckily for the United States, the belief that safety could be achieved through submission quickly faded. No matter how hard their General tried to keep his soldiers in check, they still viewed and treated the locals more like conquered rebels than returning allies. Engaging in all kinds of immoral behavior, the looting and destruction of property were among the least troubling of the harm they caused. Not only the men but also women faced the most provoking abuses, which are the kind of grievances that are hardest to forgive and hardest to forget. Moreover, these excesses were not limited to those who actively supported the American cause. The indifferent and even the loyalists fell victim to this indiscriminate wave of robbery and violence.

The effect of such proceedings on a people whose country had never before been the seat of war, and whose non-resistance had been occasioned solely by the expectation of that security which had been promised as the reward of submission to the royal authority, could not fail to equal the most sanguine hopes of the friends of the revolution. A sense of personal wrongs produced a temper which national considerations had proved too weak to excite; and, when the battles of Trenton and Princeton relieved the inhabitants from fears inspired by the presence of their invaders, the great body of the people flew to arms; and numbers who could not be brought into the field to check the advancing enemy, and prevent the ravages which uniformly afflict a country that becomes the seat of war, were prompt in avenging those ravages. Small bodies of militia scoured the country, seized on stragglers, behaved unexceptionably well in several slight skirmishes, and were collecting in such numbers as to threaten the weaker British posts with the fate which had befallen Trenton and Princeton.

The impact of such actions on a people whose country had never before experienced war, and whose lack of resistance had been based solely on the promise of security that came with submitting to royal authority, was bound to meet the highest expectations of the revolution's supporters. Feelings of personal injustice created a mood that national considerations had failed to inspire; and when the battles of Trenton and Princeton freed the locals from the fears caused by their invaders, the majority of the people took up arms. Many who couldn't join the fight to stop the advancing enemy or prevent the destruction that always comes to a country at war were quick to seek revenge for those damages. Small groups of militia patrolled the area, captured stragglers, performed admirably in several minor skirmishes, and were gathering in such force that they threatened the weaker British outposts with the same fate as Trenton and Princeton.

To guard against that spirit of enterprise which his adversary had displayed to such advantage, General Howe determined to strengthen his posts by contracting them. The position taken for the purpose of covering the country were abandoned; and the British force in New Jersey was collected at New Brunswick, on the Raritan, and at Amboy, a small town at the mouth of that river.

To protect against the initiative that his opponent had shown so effectively, General Howe decided to reinforce his positions by consolidating them. The strategic locations meant to secure the area were given up, and the British troops in New Jersey were gathered at New Brunswick, along the Raritan River, and at Amboy, a small town at the river's mouth.

Feeble as was the American army, this movement was not effected without some loss. On the evacuation of Elizabeth town, General Maxwell attacked the British rear, and captured about seventy men with a part of their baggage.

Feeble as the American army was, this movement wasn't carried out without some loss. When Elizabeth Town was evacuated, General Maxwell attacked the British rear and captured around seventy men along with some of their supplies.

The American troops had been so diminished by the extreme severity of the service, that it was with much difficulty the appearance of an army could be maintained. Fresh militia and volunteers arrived in camp, whose numbers were exaggerated by report. These additions to his small remaining regular force enabled the General to take different positions near the lines of the enemy, to harass him perpetually, restrain his foraging parties, and produce considerable distress in his camp.

The American troops had been so weakened by the harshness of their service that it was very difficult to maintain the look of an army. New militia and volunteers showed up at camp, and their numbers were inflated in reports. These reinforcements to his dwindling regular forces allowed the General to take various positions near the enemy lines, constantly harass them, limit their foraging parties, and cause significant distress in their camp.

January 12.

While, with little more than an imaginary army, General Washington thus harassed and confined his adversary, he came to the hazardous resolution of freeing himself and his troops from the fear of a calamity which he found it impossible to elude, and which had proved more fatal in his camp than the sword of the enemy.

While General Washington, with nothing more than an imaginary army, harassed and kept his opponent at bay, he made the risky decision to free himself and his troops from the looming disaster that he found impossible to escape, which had been more deadly in his camp than the enemy's sword.

American army inoculated.

Inoculation having been rarely practised in the western world, the American youth remained liable to the small pox. Notwithstanding the efforts to guard against this disease, it had found its way into both the northern and middle army, and had impaired the strength of both to an alarming degree. To avoid the return of the same evil, the General determined to inoculate all the soldiers in the American service. With the utmost secrecy, preparations were made to give the infection in camp; and the hospital physicians in Philadelphia were ordered to carry all the southern troops, as they should arrive, through the disease. Similar orders were also given to the physicians at other places; and thus an army exempt from the fear of a calamity which had, at all times, endangered the most important operations, was prepared for the ensuing campaign. This example was followed through the country; and this alarming disease was no longer the terror of America.

Inoculation had rarely been practiced in the western world, so American youth remained vulnerable to smallpox. Despite efforts to protect against this disease, it managed to infiltrate both the northern and middle armies, significantly weakening them. To prevent this problem from happening again, the General decided to inoculate all the soldiers in the American service. With the utmost secrecy, plans were made to administer the infection in camp; hospital physicians in Philadelphia were instructed to expose all the southern troops to the disease as they arrived. Similar orders were given to physicians in other locations; thus, an army free from the fear of a threat that had always jeopardized crucial operations was prepared for the upcoming campaign. This approach was adopted nationwide, and this frightening disease was no longer a source of terror for America.

As the main body of the British army was cantoned in Jersey, and a strong detachment occupied Rhode Island, General Washington believed that New York could not be perfectly secure. His intelligence strengthened this opinion; and, as an army, respectable in point of numbers, had been assembled about Peekskill, he ordered General Heath to approach New York for the purpose of foraging, and, should appearances favour the attempt, of attacking the forts which guarded the entrance into the island. The hope was entertained that General Howe, alarmed for New York, might either withdraw his troops from Jersey, or so weaken his posts in that state as to endanger them. Should this hope be disappointed, it was believed that something handsome might be done, either on York or Long Island.

As the main part of the British army was stationed in Jersey and a strong detachment was positioned in Rhode Island, General Washington felt that New York could not be completely secure. His intelligence reports supported this view; and since a significant army had gathered around Peekskill, he ordered General Heath to move towards New York to gather supplies, and, if the situation looked promising, to attack the forts that protected the entrance to the island. There was hope that General Howe, worried about New York, might either pull his troops out of Jersey or weaken his positions in that state, putting them at risk. If that hope fell through, it was believed that some significant action could be taken either in York or Long Island.

General Heath moves down to Kingsbridge, but returns to Peekskill without effecting anything.

In pursuance of this plan, General Heath marched down to West Chester, and summoned fort Independence to surrender; but, the garrison determining to hold the place, a council of war deemed it unadviseable to risk an assault. An embarkation of troops which took place, about that time, at Rhode Island, alarmed General Heath for his rear, and induced him to resume his ground in the Highlands.

In following this plan, General Heath marched to West Chester and ordered Fort Independence to surrender; however, the garrison decided to defend the fort, and a council of war considered it unwise to attempt an assault. Around that time, a troop deployment occurred at Rhode Island, which worried General Heath about his rear and prompted him to return to his position in the Highlands.

Though this attempt entirely failed, the Commander-in-chief still meditated important operations during the winter. All the intelligence from Europe demonstrated the necessity of these operations, and the fallacy of the hope, still extensively cherished, that the war would be abandoned by Great Britain. The administration was still supported by great majorities in parliament; and the nation seemed well disposed to employ all its means to reannex to the empire, what were still denominated, revolted colonies. It was not to be doubted that large reinforcements would arrive in the spring; and the safety of the nation would be in hazard should General Howe remain in full force till they should be received. The utmost efforts were made by the Commander-in-chief to collect a sufficient number of troops to enable him to give a decisive blow to some one of the positions of his enemy. The state sovereignties, where the real energies of government resided, were incessantly urged to fill their regiments, and to bring their quotas into the field; and congress, at his instance, passed resolutions authorizing him to draw the troops from Peekskill, and to call out the militia of the neighbouring states. "It being," these resolutions proceed to say, "the earnest desire of congress, to make the army under the immediate command of General Washington sufficiently strong, not only to curb and confine the enemy within their present quarters, and prevent their drawing support of any kind from the country, but, by the divine blessing, totally to subdue them before they can be reinforced."

Though this attempt completely failed, the Commander-in-chief continued to plan important operations during the winter. All the information coming from Europe showed the need for these operations and revealed the false hope, still widely held, that Great Britain would abandon the war. The administration still had strong support in parliament, and the nation seemed willing to use all its resources to reclaim what were still called revolted colonies. There was no doubt that large reinforcements would arrive in the spring, and the nation's safety would be at risk if General Howe maintained full force until they arrived. The Commander-in-chief made every effort to gather enough troops to launch a decisive attack on one of the enemy's positions. The state governments, where real power resided, were constantly urged to fill their regiments and bring their quotas into the field; and congress, at his request, passed resolutions allowing him to withdraw troops from Peekskill and call up the militias from neighboring states. "It being," these resolutions state, "the earnest desire of congress, to make the army under the immediate command of General Washington sufficiently strong, not only to limit and contain the enemy within their current positions, and prevent them from drawing any support from the country, but, with divine blessing, to completely defeat them before they can be reinforced."

These resolves were communicated to the general, in a letter, manifesting the confident expectation of congress that the desire expressed in them would soon be realized. But the energy displayed in their passage could not be maintained in their execution.

These decisions were communicated to the general in a letter, showing Congress's strong hope that the wishes expressed in them would soon come true. However, the enthusiasm shown in their approval couldn't be sustained in their execution.

Many causes concurred to prevent the collection of a force competent to those vigorous operations which the enterprising genius of the Commander-in-chief had provisionally planned, and the sanguine temper of congress had anticipated. Some of the state assemblies did not even complete the appointment of officers till the spring; and then, bitter contests concerning rank remained to be adjusted when the troops should join the army. After these arrangements were made, the difficulty of enlisting men was unexpectedly great. The immense hardships to which the naked soldiers had been exposed, during a winter campaign, in the face of a superior enemy; the mortality resulting from those hardships, and probably from an injudicious arrangement of the hospital department which was found to be the tomb of the sick; had excited a general disgust to the service; and a consequent unwillingness to engage in it.

Many reasons came together to stop the formation of a force capable of carrying out the bold plans that the Commander-in-chief had tentatively proposed, and that Congress had optimistically expected. Some state assemblies didn’t even finish appointing officers until the spring, and then there were bitter disagreements about rank that needed to be settled when the troops joined the army. After these arrangements were made, the challenge of enlisting men turned out to be unexpectedly difficult. The severe hardships faced by the poorly equipped soldiers during a winter campaign, against a stronger enemy; the deaths resulting from those hardships, and likely from poor organization of the hospital system, which became a death trap for the sick; had created a widespread aversion to military service and a resulting reluctance to sign up.

From these causes the army continued so feeble that the general, instead of being able to execute the great designs he had meditated, entertained serious fears that Sir William Howe would take the field during the winter, force his positions, cross the Delaware on the ice, and proceed to Philadelphia. In the apprehension of this attempt, and to avoid that confusion which would result from the removal of stores in the crisis of military operations, he had taken the precaution, as soon as the armies were in winter quarters, to convey those which were most valuable, to a distance from the route which it was supposed the British army would pursue.

Due to these issues, the army remained so weak that the general, instead of being able to carry out his ambitious plans, seriously feared that Sir William Howe would go into action during the winter, break through their positions, cross the Delaware River on the ice, and make his way to Philadelphia. Worried about this possibility, and to prevent the chaos that would come from moving supplies during critical military operations, he took the precaution, as soon as the armies settled into winter quarters, to move the most valuable supplies far away from the path the British army was expected to take.

March 4.

The real condition of the army is exhibited in a letter from the Commander-in-chief to congress, in answer to that which enclosed the resolutions already mentioned, and which expressed the brilliant schemes of victory formed by the government. "Could I," said the general, "accomplish the important objects so eagerly wished by congress; confining the enemy within their present quarters, preventing their getting supplies from the country, and totally subduing them before they are reinforced, I should be happy indeed. But what prospect or hope can there be of my effecting so desirable a work at this time? The enclosed return,[56] to which I solicit the most serious attention of congress, comprehends the whole force I have in Jersey. It is but a handful, and bears no proportion on the scale of numbers to that of the enemy. Added to this, the major part is made up of militia. The most sanguine in speculation can not deem it more than adequate to the least valuable purposes of war."

The actual condition of the army is shown in a letter from the Commander-in-chief to Congress, in response to the letter that included the already mentioned resolutions, which highlighted the impressive plans for victory created by the government. "If I could," said the general, "achieve the important goals so eagerly desired by Congress; keeping the enemy confined to their current positions, stopping them from getting supplies from the area, and completely defeating them before they get reinforcements, I would be very happy. But what hope or chance is there of me accomplishing such a desirable task right now? The attached report,[56] which I ask Congress to take very seriously, includes the entire force I have in Jersey. It's just a small group and doesn't compare in numbers to the enemy. Furthermore, most of it is made up of militia. Even the most optimistic thinkers can't consider it more than sufficient for the least important purposes of war."

Skirmishes.

Though unable to act with the vigour he wished, the American general kept up a war of skirmishes through the winter. In the course of it, the British loss was believed to be considerable; and hopes were entertained that, from the scarcity of forage, neither their cavalry nor draft horses would be in a condition to take the field when the campaign should open. Their foraging parties were often attacked to advantage. Frequent small successes, the details of which filled the papers throughout the United States, not only increased the confidence of the American soldiers, but served greatly to animate the people.

Though he couldn't act as forcefully as he wanted, the American general maintained a series of skirmishes throughout the winter. During this time, it was believed that the British suffered significant losses; there were hopes that, due to a shortage of forage, neither their cavalry nor draft horses would be ready for battle when the campaign started. Their foraging parties were often successfully ambushed. Numerous small victories, the details of which were reported in newspapers across the United States, not only boosted the confidence of the American soldiers but also greatly inspired the public.

State of the army.

The hope of collecting a sufficient force during the winter to make any valuable impression on the British army being disappointed, the views of the General were directed to the next campaign.

The hope of gathering enough troops over the winter to make a meaningful impact on the British army didn't work out, so the General focused on the upcoming campaign.

As the new army was to be raised by the authority of the state governments, he urged on them the necessity of bringing a respectable force into the field early in the spring, with all the earnestness which was suggested by his situation, and zeal for the service.

As the new army was to be organized by the state governments, he strongly encouraged them to mobilize a respectable force early in the spring, with all the seriousness that his position and dedication to the service demanded.

In Connecticut and Massachusetts, the country was laid off into districts, each of which was required, by a given day, to furnish a soldier enlisted for three years, or during the war; in default of which, one person, from those capable of bearing arms, was to be drafted to serve until the first of the ensuing January. The Commander-in-chief, though still deprecating the introduction of men into the army whose terms of service would be of short duration, felt the necessity of submitting to this expedient, as the most eligible which could now be adopted.

In Connecticut and Massachusetts, the country was divided into districts, each of which had to provide a soldier enlisted for three years or for the duration of the war by a specified date. If they failed to do so, one person from those eligible to serve was to be drafted to serve until the first of the following January. The Commander-in-chief, while still opposed to bringing in soldiers whose service would be short, recognized the need to resort to this option as the best available solution at that time.

In Virginia, where the same difficulty attended enlistments, it was proposed by the executive to fill the regiments with volunteers, who should engage to serve for six months. This plan was submitted to General Washington by Governor Henry, and his opinion asked upon it. "I am under the necessity of observing," said the General in reply, "that the volunteer plan which you mention will never answer any valuable purpose, and that I can not but disapprove the measure. To the short engagements of our troops may be fairly and justly ascribed almost every misfortune that we have experienced."

In Virginia, where signing up for the military was also a challenge, the government suggested filling the regiments with volunteers who would commit to serve for six months. Governor Henry presented this plan to General Washington and asked for his opinion. "I have to point out," the General replied, "that the volunteer plan you’re talking about will never be effective, and I can’t support this idea. The short commitments of our soldiers can fairly be blamed for almost every trouble we've faced."

In a subsequent letter to the same gentleman, enforcing earnestly the necessity of bringing a sufficient army into the field, though coercive measures should be adopted, some alternatives were suggested, which, in a later period of the war, constituted the basis of various experiments to furnish the quota of troops required from that state.

In a later letter to the same man, strongly emphasizing the need to deploy a sufficient army, even if forceful actions needed to be taken, some alternatives were proposed. These ideas later became the foundation for several attempts to supply the necessary number of troops from that state during the war.

As the season for active operations approached, fresh difficulties, growing out of the organization of the American system, unfolded themselves. As every state was exposed to invasion, and the command of the ocean enabled the British general to transfer the war, at pleasure, to any part of the Union, the attention of each was directed exclusively to its particular situation. Each state in the neighbourhood of the great theatre of action, contemplating its own danger, claimed the protection which is due from the whole to its parts. Although the object of the confederation was the same with that pursued by each of its members, the spirit incident to every league could not be controlled in an empire where, notwithstanding the existence of a head, the essentials of government resided in the members. It was displayed in repeated efforts to give to the energies of the army such various directions, as would leave it unable to effect any great object, or to obstruct any one plan the enemy might form. The patriotism of the day, however, and the unexampled confidence placed by all the state governments in the Commander-in-chief, prevented the mischiefs this spirit is so well calculated to generate. His representations made their proper impression; and the intention of retaining continental troops for local defence was abandoned, though with some reluctance. The burden, however, of calling militia from their domestic avocations, at every threat of invasion, to watch every military post in each state, became so intolerable, that the people cast about for other expedients to relieve themselves from its weight. The plan of raising regular corps, to be exclusively under state authority, and thus be a perpetual substitute for the yeomanry of the country, presented itself as the most effectual and convenient mode of protecting the coasts from insult.

As the time for active operations approached, new challenges emerging from the organization of the American system became apparent. With every state facing the risk of invasion and the British general having the ability to shift the war to any part of the Union at will, each state's focus was solely on its own situation. States near the main area of conflict, worried about their own safety, demanded the protection that should come from the whole to its parts. While the confederation's goal was the same as that of each member, the competitive spirit inherent in every league couldn't be controlled in a system where, despite having a leader, the core of governance resided in the individual members. This was evident in repeated attempts to direct the army's efforts in so many different ways that it was unable to achieve any significant goal or disrupt any plan the enemy might devise. However, the patriotism of the time and the unprecedented trust placed by all the state governments in the Commander-in-chief helped mitigate the potential problems caused by this spirit. His messages had the right impact, and the plan to keep continental troops for local defense was eventually dropped, though not without some hesitation. Nonetheless, the burden of calling up the militia from their daily lives at every hint of invasion to guard every military post in each state became so unbearable that people started looking for other ways to ease this pressure. The idea of raising regular military units, which would be solely under state control, and serve as a permanent substitute for the local farmers, emerged as the most effective and practical way to protect the coasts from threats.

During the winter, General Howe kept his troops in their quarters, attending to their comfort. As the season for more active operations approached, his first attention was directed to the destruction of the scanty supplies prepared by the Americans for the ensuing campaign. A small place on the Hudson called Peekskill, about fifty miles above New York, was generally the residence of the officer commanding in the Highlands, and was used for the reception of stores, to be distributed into the neighbouring posts as occasion might require. Its strength, like that of all others depending for defence on militia, was subject to great fluctuation. As soon as the ice was out of the river, General Howe took advantage of its occasional weakness, to carry on an expedition against it, for the purpose of destroying the stores there deposited, or of bringing them away.

During the winter, General Howe kept his troops in their quarters, focusing on their comfort. As the time for more active operations approached, his first priority was to eliminate the limited supplies that the Americans had prepared for the upcoming campaign. A small location on the Hudson called Peekskill, about fifty miles north of New York, was usually where the officer in charge of the Highlands resided, and it was used for storing supplies to be sent to nearby posts as needed. Its strength, like all defenses relying on militia, varied greatly. As soon as the ice melted in the river, General Howe took advantage of its temporary weakness to launch a mission against it, aiming to destroy the supplies stored there or to capture them.

March 23.
Destruction of stores at Peekskill.

Colonel Bird was detached up the river on this service, with about five hundred men, under convoy of a frigate and some armed vessels. General M'Dougal, whose numbers did not at that time exceed two hundred and fifty men, received timely notice of his approach, and exerted himself for the removal of the stores into the strong country in his rear. Before this could be effected, Colonel Bird appeared; and M'Dougal, after setting fire to the remaining stores and barracks, retired into the strong grounds in the rear of Peekskill. The British detachment completed the conflagration, and returned to New York. During their short stay, a piquet guard was attacked by Colonel Willet, and driven in with the loss of a few men; a circumstance, believed by General M'Dougal, to have hastened the re-embarkation of the detachment.

Colonel Bird was assigned to this mission up the river with about five hundred men, escorted by a frigate and some armed vessels. General M'Dougal, who had fewer than two hundred and fifty men at that time, got timely word of his approach and worked hard to move the supplies into the secure area behind him. Before he could complete this, Colonel Bird showed up; and M'Dougal, after setting fire to the remaining supplies and barracks, retreated to the strongholds behind Peekskill. The British detachment finished the destruction and returned to New York. During their brief stay, a picket guard was attacked by Colonel Willet and pushed back with a few losses; this incident led General M'Dougal to believe it quickened the re-embarkation of the detachment.

At Danbury.
April.

Military stores to a considerable amount had likewise been deposited at Danbury, on the western frontier of Connecticut. Although this place is not more than twenty miles from the Sound, yet the roughness of the intervening country, the frequent passage of troops from the eastward through the town, and the well known zeal of the neighbouring militia, were believed sufficient to secure the magazines collected at it. Against Danbury an expedition was projected; and two thousand men under the command of Governor Tryon, major general of the provincials in the British service, assisted by Brigadiers Agnew and Sir William Erskine, were employed in it.

Military supplies had been stored in significant quantities at Danbury, located on the western frontier of Connecticut. Even though this place is only about twenty miles from the Sound, the rough terrain in between, the frequent movement of troops from the east through the town, and the well-known commitment of the local militia were thought to be enough to protect the supplies kept there. An expedition was planned against Danbury, and two thousand men, led by Governor Tryon, a major general of the provincials in British service, along with Brigadiers Agnew and Sir William Erskine, were assigned to it.

April 28.

On the 25th of April the fleet appeared off the coast of Connecticut; and in the evening the troops were landed without opposition between Fairfield and Norwalk. General Silliman, then casually in that part of the country, immediately despatched expresses to assemble the militia. In the mean time Tryon proceeded to Danbury, which he reached about two the next day. On his approach, Colonel Huntingdon, who had occupied the town with about one hundred and fifty men, retired to a neighbouring height, and Danbury, with the magazines it contained, was consumed by fire. General Arnold, who was also in the state superintending the recruiting service, joined General Silliman at Reading, where that officer had collected about five hundred militia. General Wooster, who had resigned his commission in the continental service, and been appointed major general of the militia, fell in with them at the same place, and they proceeded in the night through a heavy rain to Bethel, about eight miles from Danbury. Having heard next morning that Tryon, after destroying the town and magazines, was returning, they divided their troops; and General Wooster, with about three hundred men, fell in his rear, while Arnold, with about five hundred, crossing the country, took post in his front at Ridgefield. Wooster came up with his rear about eleven in the morning, attacked it with great gallantry, and a sharp skirmish ensued, in which he was mortally wounded,[57] and his troops were repulsed. Tryon then proceeded to Ridgefield, where he found Arnold already intrenched on a strong piece of ground, and prepared to dispute his passage. A warm skirmish ensued, which continued nearly an hour. Arnold was at length driven from the field; after which he retreated to Paugatuck, about three miles east of Norwalk. At break of day next morning, after setting Ridgefield on fire, the British resumed their march. About eleven in the forenoon, they were again met by Arnold, whose numbers increased during the day to rather more than one thousand men; among whom were some continental troops. A continued skirmishing was kept up until five in the afternoon, when the British formed on a hill near their ships. The Americans attacked them with intrepidity, but were repulsed and broken. Tryon, availing himself of this respite, re-embarked his troops, and returned to New York.

On April 25th, the fleet showed up off the coast of Connecticut; that evening, the troops landed without any resistance between Fairfield and Norwalk. General Silliman, who happened to be in that area, quickly sent out messengers to gather the militia. Meanwhile, Tryon headed to Danbury, arriving around two the next day. As he approached, Colonel Huntingdon, who had around one hundred and fifty men in the town, retreated to a nearby hill, and Danbury, along with its supplies, was set on fire. General Arnold, who was also in the state overseeing recruitment, joined General Silliman in Reading, where Silliman had gathered about five hundred militia. General Wooster, who had stepped down from his commission in the Continental Army and was made major general of the militia, met up with them at the same location, and they traveled through heavy rain to Bethel that night, about eight miles from Danbury. The next morning, after hearing that Tryon had destroyed the town and its supplies and was on his way back, they split their troops. General Wooster, with about three hundred men, followed him from behind, while Arnold, with around five hundred, crossed the country and set up in front of him at Ridgefield. Wooster caught up with the rear at about eleven in the morning, bravely attacked it, and a fierce skirmish broke out, during which he was mortally wounded,[57] and his troops were pushed back. Tryon then moved on to Ridgefield, where he found Arnold already fortified on strong ground, ready to contest his passage. A heated skirmish lasted nearly an hour. Eventually, Arnold was driven from the field and retreated to Paugatuck, about three miles east of Norwalk. At dawn the next morning, after burning Ridgefield, the British continued their march. Around eleven in the morning, they encountered Arnold again, whose numbers had swelled to over one thousand men, including some Continental troops. They engaged in continuous skirmishing until five in the afternoon when the British positioned themselves on a hill near their ships. The Americans charged with bravery but were pushed back and scattered. Taking advantage of this pause, Tryon re-embarked his troops and returned to New York.

The loss of the British amounted to about one hundred and seventy men. That of the Americans, was represented by Tryon, as being much more considerable. By themselves, it was not admitted to exceed one hundred. In this number, however, were comprehended General Wooster, Lieutenant Colonel Gould, and another field officer, killed; and Colonel Lamb wounded. Several other officers and volunteers were killed. Military and hospital stores to a considerable amount, which were greatly needed by the army, were destroyed in the magazines at Danbury; but the loss most severely felt was rather more than one thousand tents, which had been provided for the campaign about to open.

The British lost about one hundred and seventy men. According to Tryon, the American losses were much higher. However, they admitted to only about one hundred. This number included General Wooster, Lieutenant Colonel Gould, and another field officer who were killed, along with Colonel Lamb who was wounded. Several other officers and volunteers also died. A significant amount of military and hospital supplies that the army desperately needed was destroyed in the magazines at Danbury; however, the most painful loss was over one thousand tents that had been prepared for the upcoming campaign.

Not long afterwards this enterprise was successfully retaliated. A British detachment had been for some time employed in collecting forage and provisions on the eastern end of Long Island. Howe supposed this part of the country to be so completely secured by the armed vessels which incessantly traversed the Sound, that he confided the protection of the stores, deposited at a small port called Sagg Harbour, to a schooner with twelve guns, and a company of infantry.

Not long after, this operation was successfully countered. A British unit had been gathering supplies on the eastern end of Long Island for some time. Howe believed this area was so well guarded by the armed ships constantly patrolling the Sound that he entrusted the protection of the supplies stored at a small port called Sagg Harbour to a schooner with twelve guns and a company of infantry.

Expedition of Colonel Meigs to Sagg Harbour.
May.

General Parsons, who commanded a few recruits at New Haven, thinking it practicable to elude the cruisers in the bay, formed the design of surprising this party, and other adjacent posts, the execution of which was entrusted to Lieutenant Colonel Meigs, a gallant officer, who had accompanied Arnold in his memorable march to Quebec. He embarked with about two hundred and thirty men, on board thirteen whale boats, and proceeded along the coast to Guilford, where he was to cross the Sound. With about one hundred and seventy of his detachment, under convoy of two armed sloops, he proceeded across the Sound to the north division of the island near South Hold, in the neighbourhood of which a small foraging party, against which the expedition was in part directed, was supposed to lie; but they had marched two days before to New York. The boats were conveyed across the land, a distance of about fifteen miles, into a bay which deeply intersects the eastern end of Long Island, where the troops re-embarked. Crossing the bay, they landed at two in the morning, about four miles from Sagg Harbour, which place they completely surprised, and carried with charged bayonets. May 24.At the same time, a division of the detachment secured the armed schooner, and the vessels laden with forage, which were set on fire, and entirely consumed. Six of the enemy were killed, and ninety taken prisoners. A very few escaped under cover of the night.

General Parsons, who was in charge of a few new recruits in New Haven, believed it was possible to avoid the cruisers in the bay and planned to surprise this group along with other nearby posts. This task was given to Lieutenant Colonel Meigs, a brave officer who had joined Arnold on his famous march to Quebec. He set out with around two hundred and thirty men on thirteen whaleboats, heading along the coast to Guilford, where he would cross the Sound. With about one hundred and seventy of his men, escorted by two armed sloops, he crossed the Sound to the northern part of the island near South Hold, where a small foraging party, one of the targets of the expedition, was thought to be, but they had already marched to New York two days earlier. The boats were transported overland for about fifteen miles to a bay that deeply cuts into the eastern part of Long Island, where the troops reboarded. After crossing the bay, they landed at two in the morning, about four miles from Sagg Harbour, catching the place completely by surprise and taking it with charged bayonets. May 24th.Meanwhile, another division of the detachment took control of the armed schooner and the ships loaded with forage, which were set on fire and completely destroyed. Six of the enemy were killed, and ninety were taken prisoner. A few managed to escape under the cover of night.

The object of his expedition being effected without the loss of a man, Colonel Meigs returned to Guilford with his prisoners. "Having," as was stated in the letter to General Parsons, "moved with such uncommon celerity, as to have transported his men, by land and water, ninety miles in twenty-five hours." Congress directed a sword to be presented to him, and passed a resolution expressing the high sense entertained of his merit, and of the prudence, activity, and valour, displayed by himself and his party.

The mission of his expedition was completed without losing a single man, so Colonel Meigs returned to Guilford with his prisoners. "Having," as mentioned in the letter to General Parsons, "moved with such exceptional speed that he managed to transport his men, by land and water, ninety miles in just twenty-five hours." Congress ordered a sword to be presented to him and passed a resolution acknowledging the high regard for his merit, as well as the wisdom, energy, and bravery shown by him and his team.

The exertions made by the Commander-in-chief through the winter to raise a powerful army for the ensuing campaign, had not been successful. The hopes respecting its strength which the flattering reports made from every quarter had authorized him to form, were cruelly disappointed; and he found himself not only unable to carry into effect the offensive operations he had meditated, but unequal even to defensive war. That steady and persevering courage, however, which had supported himself and the American cause through the gloomy scenes of the preceding year, did not forsake him; and that sound judgment which applies to the best advantage those means which are attainable, however inadequate they may be, still remained. His plan of operations was adapted to that which he believed his enemy had formed. He was persuaded either that General Burgoyne would endeavour to take Ticonderoga, and to penetrate to the Hudson, in which event General Howe would co-operate with him by moving up that river, and attempting to possess himself of the forts and high grounds commanding its passage; or that Burgoyne would join the grand army at New York by sea; after which the combined armies would proceed against Philadelphia.

The efforts made by the Commander-in-Chief throughout the winter to build a strong army for the upcoming campaign were not successful. The hopes regarding its strength, which the flattering reports from all sides had led him to believe, were painfully shattered; and he found himself not only unable to carry out the offensive operations he had planned but also inadequate for defensive warfare. However, the steady and determined courage that had supported him and the American cause through the dark times of the previous year did not abandon him; and his sound judgment, which utilized whatever resources were available, regardless of how limited they were, still remained. His plan of action was shaped by what he believed his enemy was planning. He was convinced that either General Burgoyne would try to take Ticonderoga and move towards the Hudson, in which case General Howe would work with him by advancing up that river and trying to seize the forts and high ground controlling its passage; or that Burgoyne would join the main army in New York by sea; after which the combined armies would move against Philadelphia.

To counteract the designs of the enemy, whatever they might be, to defend the three great points, Ticonderoga, the Highlands of New York, and Philadelphia, against two powerful armies so much superior to him, in arms, in numbers, and in discipline, it was necessary to make such an arrangement of his troops as would enable the parts reciprocally to aid each other, without neglecting objects of great, and almost equal magnitude which were alike threatened, and were far asunder. To effect these purposes, the troops of New England and New York were divided between Ticonderoga and Peekskill, while those from Jersey to North Carolina inclusive, were directed to assemble at the camp to be formed in Jersey. The more southern troops remained in that weak quarter of the union for its protection.

To counteract the enemy's plans, whatever they might be, and to defend the three key locations—Ticonderoga, the Highlands of New York, and Philadelphia—against two powerful armies that were far superior in weaponry, numbers, and training, it was important to organize his troops in a way that allowed them to support each other. This needed to happen without ignoring other significant threats that were also far apart. To achieve this, the troops from New England and New York were split between Ticonderoga and Peekskill, while the troops from New Jersey to North Carolina were instructed to gather at a camp in Jersey. The more southern troops stayed in that vulnerable part of the union for its protection.

Camp formed at Middlebrook.

These arrangements being made, and the recruits collected, the camp at Morristown was broken up, the detachments called in, and the army assembled at Middlebrook, just behind a connected ridge of strong and commanding heights, north of the road leading to Philadelphia, and about ten miles from Brunswick.

These plans in place and the recruits gathered, the camp at Morristown was dismantled, the units recalled, and the army gathered at Middlebrook, just behind a series of strong and strategic heights, north of the road to Philadelphia, about ten miles from Brunswick.

This camp, the approaches to which were naturally difficult, was rendered still more defensible by intrenchments. The heights in front commanded a prospect of the course of the Raritan, the road to Philadelphia, the hills about Brunswick, and a considerable part of the country between that place and Amboy; so as to afford a full view of the most interesting movements of the enemy.

This camp, which was already hard to reach, was made even more secure by fortifications. The higher ground in front offered a clear view of the Raritan River, the road to Philadelphia, the hills around Brunswick, and a large portion of the area between Brunswick and Amboy, providing a complete view of the enemy's most important movements.

The force brought into the field by America required all the aid which could be derived from strong positions, and unremitting vigilance. On the 20th of May, the total of the army in Jersey, excluding cavalry and artillery, amounted to only eight thousand three hundred and seventy-eight men, of whom upwards of two thousand were sick. The effective rank and file were only five thousand seven hundred and thirty-eight.

The military presence brought by America needed every bit of support from solid positions and constant watchfulness. On May 20th, the total number of troops in Jersey, not counting cavalry and artillery, was just eight thousand three hundred and seventy-eight, with over two thousand being ill. The effective soldiers available were only five thousand seven hundred and thirty-eight.

Had this army been composed of the best disciplined troops, its inferiority, in point of numbers, must have limited its operations to defensive war; and have rendered it incompetent to the protection of any place, whose defence would require a battle in the open field. But more than half the troops[58] were unacquainted with the first rudiments of military duty, and had never looked an enemy in the face. As an additional cause of apprehension, a large proportion of the soldiers, especially from the middle states, were foreigners, many of them servants, in whose attachment to the American cause full confidence could not be placed.

If this army had been made up of the best-trained troops, its smaller numbers would have limited its actions to defensive warfare and made it unable to protect any location that required fighting in open battle. However, more than half of the troops[58] were unfamiliar with the basics of military duty and had never faced an enemy. To add to the concern, a significant number of the soldiers, especially from the middle states, were foreigners, many of whom were servants, and there wasn't complete trust in their loyalty to the American cause.

General Washington, anticipating a movement by land towards Philadelphia, had taken the precaution to give orders for assembling on the western bank of the Delaware, an army of militia, strengthened by a few continental troops, the command of which was given to General Arnold, who was then in Philadelphia, employed in the settlement of his accounts.

General Washington, expecting a land movement towards Philadelphia, had the foresight to order an army of militia to assemble on the western bank of the Delaware, backed by a few continental troops. The command was given to General Arnold, who was in Philadelphia at the time, working on settling his accounts.

The first and real object of the campaign, on the part of General Howe, was the acquisition of Philadelphia. He intended to march through Jersey; and, after securing the submission of that state, to cross the Delaware on a portable bridge constructed in the winter for the purpose, and proceed by land to that city. If, in the execution of this plan, the Americans could be brought to a general action on equal ground, the advantages of the royal army must insure a victory. But should Washington decline an engagement, and be again pressed over the Delaware, the object would be as certainly obtained.

The main goal of General Howe's campaign was to take Philadelphia. He planned to march through New Jersey, and after gaining control of that state, he would cross the Delaware using a portable bridge built for that purpose during the winter, then head overland to the city. If the Americans could be lured into a battle on equal terms, the advantages of the royal army would guarantee a win. However, if Washington decided not to fight and was pushed back across the Delaware again, the goal would still be achieved.

Had Sir William Howe taken the field before the continental troops were assembled, this plan might probably have been executed without any serious obstruction; but the tents and camp equipage expected from Europe did not arrive until General Washington had collected his forces, and taken possession of the strong post on the heights of Middlebrook. It would be dangerous to attack him on such advantageous ground; for, although his camp might be forced, victory would probably be attended with such loss, as to disable the victor from reaping its fruits.

Had Sir William Howe taken the field before the Continental troops gathered, this plan could likely have been carried out without any major obstacles. However, the tents and camp supplies expected from Europe didn’t arrive until General Washington had brought his forces together and taken control of the strong position on the heights of Middlebrook. It would be risky to attack him on such favorable ground. Even if his camp were taken, victory would probably come at such a cost that the victor would be unable to benefit from it.

If it was deemed too hazardous to attack the strong camp at Middlebrook, an attempt to cross the Delaware, in the face of an army collected on its western bank, while that under General Washington remained unbroken in his rear, was an experiment of equal danger. It comported with the cautious temper of Sir William Howe to devise some other plan of operation to which he might resort, should he be unable to seduce the American general from his advantageous position.

If it was considered too risky to attack the fortified camp at Middlebrook, then trying to cross the Delaware, with an army gathered on its western bank and General Washington's troops still intact behind him, was just as dangerous. It suited Sir William Howe’s cautious nature to come up with an alternative plan of action he could use if he couldn't lure the American general out of his strong position.

The two great bays of Delaware and Chesapeake suggested the alternative of proceeding by water, should he be unable to manoeuvre General Washington out of his present encampment.

The two major bays of Delaware and Chesapeake offered the option of traveling by water if he couldn't get General Washington to move from his current campsite.

June.

The plan of the campaign being settled, and some small reinforcements with the expected camp equipage being received from Europe, General Howe, leaving a garrison in New York, and a guard in Amboy, assembled his army at Brunswick, June 12.and gave strong indications of an intention to penetrate through the country to the Delaware, and reach Philadelphia by land.

The campaign plan was finalized, and some minor reinforcements along with the expected camp supplies arrived from Europe. General Howe, after leaving a garrison in New York and a guard in Amboy, gathered his army at Brunswick, June 12. He showed clear signs of wanting to move through the countryside to the Delaware in order to reach Philadelphia by land.

Believing this to be his real design, Washington placed a select corps of riflemen under the command of Colonel Morgan, an officer who had distinguished himself in the unfortunate attempt to storm Quebec, and in whom those peculiar qualities which fit a man for the command of a partisan corps, designed to act on the lines of a formidable enemy, were eminently united.

Believing this to be his true intention, Washington assigned a special group of riflemen to Colonel Morgan, an officer who had made a name for himself during the unsuccessful attempt to capture Quebec. He had the unique qualities that made him well-suited to lead a partisan group meant to operate against a powerful enemy.

He was ordered to take post at Vanvighton's Bridge on the Raritan, just above its confluence with the Millstone River, to watch the left flank of the British army, and seize every occasion to harass it.

He was instructed to take position at Vanvighton's Bridge on the Raritan, just above where it meets the Millstone River, to keep an eye on the left side of the British army and take every opportunity to disrupt them.

Sir William Howe moves out to Somerset Court House in great force.

Early in the morning of the 14th, Sir William Howe, leaving two thousand men under the command of General Matthews at Brunswick, advanced in two columns towards the Delaware. The front of the first, under Lord Cornwallis, reached Somerset Court House, nine miles from Brunswick, by the appearance of day; and the second, commanded by General de Heister, reached Middlebush about the same time.

Early in the morning on the 14th, Sir William Howe, leaving two thousand men under General Matthews at Brunswick, moved forward in two columns toward the Delaware. The front of the first column, led by Lord Cornwallis, arrived at Somerset Court House, nine miles from Brunswick, at dawn; the second column, commanded by General de Heister, reached Middlebush around the same time.

This movement was made with the view of inducing General Washington to quit his fortified camp, and approach the Delaware,[59] in which event, the British general expected to bring on an engagement on ground less disadvantageous than that now occupied by the American army. But that officer understood the importance of his position too well to abandon it. On the first intelligence that the enemy was in motion, he drew out his whole army, and formed it, to great advantage, on the heights in front of his camp. This position was constantly maintained. The troops remained in order of battle during the day; and, in the night, slept on the ground to be defended. In the mean time the Jersey militia, with an alacrity theretofore unexampled in that state, took the field in great numbers. They principally joined General Sullivan, who had retired from Princeton, behind the Sourland hills towards Flemingtown, where an army of some respectability was forming, which could readily co-operate with that under the immediate inspection of the Commander-in-chief.

This maneuver was aimed at persuading General Washington to leave his fortified camp and move toward the Delaware,[59] in which case the British general hoped to initiate a battle on ground that was less disadvantageous than what the American army currently occupied. However, that officer understood the significance of his position too well to abandon it. Upon receiving the first news that the enemy was on the move, he deployed his entire army and positioned them advantageously on the heights in front of his camp. This position was consistently held. The troops remained in battle formation during the day and, at night, slept on the ground they were defending. Meanwhile, the Jersey militia, with an enthusiasm previously unseen in that state, took the field in large numbers. They mainly joined General Sullivan, who had retreated from Princeton, moving behind the Sourland hills toward Flemingtown, where a reasonably strong army was being assembled that could easily cooperate with the forces under the direct command of the Commander-in-chief.

The settled purpose of General Washington was to defend his camp, but not to hazard a general action on other ground. He had therefore determined not to advance from the heights he occupied, into the open country, either towards the enemy, or the Delaware.

The clear goal of General Washington was to protect his camp, but he didn't want to risk a large-scale battle elsewhere. He had decided not to move from the high ground he held, whether towards the enemy or the Delaware.

The object of General Howe seems to have been, by acting on his anxiety for Philadelphia, to seduce him from the strong ground about Middlebrook, and tempt him to approach the Delaware, in the hope of defending its passage. Should he succeed in this, he had little doubt of being able to bring on an engagement, in which he counted with certainty on victory. The considerations which restrained General Howe from attempting to march through Jersey, leaving the American army in full force in his rear, had determined Washington to allow him to proceed to the Delaware, if such should be his intention. In that event, he had determined to throw those impediments only in the way of the hostile army which might harass and retard its march; and, maintaining the high and secure grounds north of the road to be taken by the enemy, to watch for an opportunity of striking some important blow with manifest advantage.

The goal of General Howe seemed to be, by preying on his concern for Philadelphia, to draw him away from the strong position at Middlebrook and lure him to approach the Delaware, hoping to defend its passage. If he succeeded in this, he was confident he could provoke a battle, where he expected to win. The reasons that held General Howe back from marching through Jersey while leaving the American army fully intact behind him led Washington to allow him to move toward the Delaware if that was his plan. In that case, Washington intended to put obstacles in the way of the enemy army to harass and slow it down; while keeping the high and secure ground north of the enemy's intended route, he would look for a chance to deliver a significant blow with clear advantages.

He was not long in penetrating the designs of his adversary. "The views of the enemy," he writes to General Arnold in a letter of the 17th, "must be to destroy this army, and get possession of Philadelphia. I am, however, clearly of opinion, that they will not move that way until they have endeavoured to give a severe blow to this army. The risk would be too great to attempt to cross a river, when they must expect to meet a formidable opposition in front, and would have such a force as ours in their rear. They might possibly be successful, but the probability would be infinitely against them. Should they be imprudent enough to make the attempt, I shall keep close upon their heels, and will do every thing in my power to make the project fatal to them.

He quickly figured out his opponent's plans. "The enemy's goals," he writes to General Arnold in a letter dated the 17th, "must be to destroy this army and take control of Philadelphia. However, I strongly believe that they won't move in that direction until they've tried to deal a serious blow to this army. The risks would be too high to try crossing a river when they would expect to face strong opposition upfront and would have a force like ours behind them. They might have some chance of success, but the odds would be overwhelmingly against them. If they are reckless enough to make the attempt, I will stay right on their tail and do everything I can to make their plan disastrous for them."

"But, besides the argument in favour of their intending, in the first place, a stroke at this army, drawn from the policy of the measure, every appearance contributes to confirm the opinion. Had their design been for the Delaware in the first instance, they would probably have made a secret, rapid march for it, and not have halted so as to awaken our attention, and give us time to prepare for obstructing them. Instead of that they have only advanced to a position necessary to facilitate an attack on our right, the part in which we are most exposed. In addition to this circumstance, they have come out as light as possible, leaving all their baggage, provisions, boats, and bridges, at Brunswick. This plainly contradicts the idea of their intending to push for the Delaware."

"But aside from the reasoning behind their intention to strike at this army, based on the strategy of the move, all signs support this view. If their goal had been to reach the Delaware from the start, they would likely have made a quick, secret march towards it and wouldn’t have stopped to draw our attention and give us time to prepare for blocking them. Instead, they've only moved to a position that makes it easier to attack our right, which is the most vulnerable part of our defenses. Additionally, they've come out as lightly equipped as possible, leaving all their baggage, supplies, boats, and bridges at Brunswick. This clearly goes against the idea that they plan to push towards the Delaware."

Returns to Amboy.

Finding the American army could not be drawn from its strong position, General Howe determined to waste no more time in threatening Philadelphia by land, but to withdraw from Jersey, and to embark his army as expeditiously as possible for the Chesapeake or the Delaware. On the night of the 19th he returned to Brunswick, and on the 22d to Amboy, from which place, the heavy baggage and a few of his troops passed into Staten Island, on the bridge which had been designed for the Delaware.

Finding that the American army couldn't be driven from its strong position, General Howe decided not to waste any more time threatening Philadelphia from the land. Instead, he chose to retreat from Jersey and get his army on board ships as quickly as possible for the Chesapeake or the Delaware. On the night of the 19th, he went back to Brunswick, and on the 22nd, he moved to Amboy. From there, the heavy baggage and some of his troops were transferred to Staten Island via the bridge that had been planned for the Delaware.

General Washington had expected this movement from Brunswick, and had made arrangements to derive some advantage from it. General Greene was detached with three brigades to annoy the British rear; and Sullivan and Maxwell were ordered to co-operate with him. In the mean time the army paraded on the heights of Middlebrook, ready to act as circumstances might require.

General Washington had anticipated this movement from Brunswick and had made plans to take advantage of it. General Greene was sent out with three brigades to disrupt the British rear, and Sullivan and Maxwell were instructed to work with him. Meanwhile, the army assembled on the heights of Middlebrook, ready to act as needed.

About sunrise, Colonel Morgan drove in a piquet guard, soon after which that division commenced its march to Amboy. Some sharp skirmishing took place between this party and Morgan's regiment, but the hope of gaining any important advantage was entirely disappointed; and the retreat to Amboy was effected with inconsiderable loss.

About sunrise, Colonel Morgan brought in a picket guard, shortly after which that division started its march to Amboy. There were some intense skirmishes between this group and Morgan's regiment, but the hope of achieving any significant advantage was completely dashed; and the retreat to Amboy was carried out with minimal loss.

June 24.

In order to cover his light parties, which still hung on the British flank and rear, General Washington advanced six or seven miles, to Quibbletown on the road to Amboy; and Lord Stirling's division was pushed still farther, to the neighbourhood of the Metucking Meeting House, for the purpose of co-operating with the light parties, should the retreat to Staten Island afford an opportunity of striking at the rear.

To cover his light troops, which were still positioned on the British flank and rear, General Washington moved about six or seven miles to Quibbletown on the way to Amboy. Lord Stirling's division was pushed even farther to the area around the Metucking Meeting House to work together with the light troops in case the retreat to Staten Island presented an opportunity to hit the rear.

Endeavors to cut off the retreat of the American army to Middlebrook, but is disappointed.

Believing it now practicable to bring on an engagement, and probably hoping to turn the left of the American army, and gain the heights in its rear, General Howe, in the night of the 25th, recalled the troops from Staten Island; and, early next morning, made a rapid movement, in two columns, towards Westfield. The right, under the command of Lord Cornwallis, took the route by Woodbridge to the Scotch Plains; and the left, led by Sir William Howe in person, marched by Metucking Meeting House, to fall into the rear of the right column. It was intended that the left should take a separate road, soon after this junction, and attack the left flank of the American army at Quibbletown; while Lord Cornwallis should gain the heights on the left of the camp at Middlebrook. Four battalions with six pieces of cannon were detached to Bonhamtown.[60]

Believing it was now feasible to initiate an engagement and likely hoping to outflank the American army and seize the heights behind it, General Howe, on the night of the 25th, recalled the troops from Staten Island. Early the next morning, he quickly moved in two columns toward Westfield. The right column, commanded by Lord Cornwallis, took the route through Woodbridge to the Scotch Plains, while the left, led personally by Sir William Howe, marched by Metucking Meeting House to position itself behind the right column. The plan was for the left to take a separate road shortly after this junction and attack the left flank of the American army at Quibbletown, while Lord Cornwallis would secure the heights on the left of the camp at Middlebrook. Four battalions with six cannons were sent to Bonhamtown.[60]

Lord Cornwallis skirmishes near the Scotch Plains with Lord Stirling.
June 30.

About Woodbridge, the right column fell in with one of the American parties of observation which gave notice of this movement. General Washington discerned his danger, put the whole army instantly in motion, and regained the camp at Middlebrook. Lord Cornwallis fell in with Lord Stirling, and a sharp skirmish ensued, in which the Americans were driven from their ground with the loss of three field pieces, and a few men. They retreated to the hills about the Scotch Plains, and were pursued as far as Westfield. Perceiving the passes in the mountains on the left of the American camp to be guarded, and the object of this skilful manoeuvre to be, consequently, unattainable, his lordship returned through Rahway to Amboy; and the whole army crossed over to Staten Island.

About Woodbridge, the right column connected with one of the American observation parties that reported this movement. General Washington recognized the threat, quickly mobilized the entire army, and returned to the camp at Middlebrook. Lord Cornwallis encountered Lord Stirling, leading to a fierce skirmish in which the Americans were forced from their position, losing three field pieces and a few men. They fell back to the hills near the Scotch Plains and were pursued as far as Westfield. Noticing that the mountain passes to the left of the American camp were secured, and realizing that the goal of this clever maneuver was therefore out of reach, his lordship returned through Rahway to Amboy, and the whole army crossed over to Staten Island.

July 2.

General Washington was now again left to his conjectures respecting the plan of the campaign. Before Sir William Howe had, in any degree disclosed his views, intelligence was received of the appearance of Burgoyne on Lake Champlain, and that Ticonderoga was threatened. This intelligence strengthened the opinion that the design of Howe must be to seize the passes in the mountains on the Hudson, secure the command of that river, and effect a junction between the two armies. Yet he could not permit himself to yield so entirely to this impression, as to make a movement which might open the way by land to Philadelphia. His army therefore maintained its station at Middlebrook; but arrangements were made to repel any sudden attack on the posts which defended the Hudson.

General Washington was once again left to speculate about the campaign's strategy. Before Sir William Howe revealed any of his plans, news came in that Burgoyne had shown up on Lake Champlain and that Ticonderoga was under threat. This information reinforced the belief that Howe’s intention was to take control of the mountain passes along the Hudson, secure the river, and link the two armies together. However, Washington couldn’t fully give in to this assumption and make a move that might open a land route to Philadelphia. Therefore, his army stayed put at Middlebrook, but preparations were made to defend against any sudden attack on the posts protecting the Hudson.

Some changes made in the stations of the British ships and troops having relieved the American general from his apprehensions of a sudden march to Philadelphia, he advanced Sullivan's division to Pompton Plains, on the way to Peekskill; and proceeded with the main body of his army, to Morristown;—thus approaching the highlands of New York, without removing so far from Middlebrook as to be unable to regain that camp should General Howe indicate an intention to seize it.

Some changes in the positions of the British ships and troops eased the American general's worries about a sudden advance to Philadelphia. He moved Sullivan's division to Pompton Plains, heading toward Peekskill, and led the main part of his army to Morristown—thus getting closer to the highlands of New York without drifting too far from Middlebrook to be unable to return to that camp if General Howe showed any signs of trying to take it.

Meanwhile, the British General prosecuted, diligently, his plan of embarkation, which was, necessarily, attended with circumstances indicating a much longer voyage than that up the North River. These circumstances were immediately communicated to the eastern states, and congress was earnestly pressed to strengthen the fortifications on the Delaware, and to increase the obstructions in that river.

Meanwhile, the British General was actively carrying out his plan for embarkation, which was inevitably associated with signs suggesting a much longer journey than just up the North River. These signs were quickly communicated to the eastern states, and Congress was strongly urged to reinforce the fortifications on the Delaware and to boost the obstacles in that river.

July 16.

In the midst of these appearances, certain intelligence was received that Burgoyne was in great force on the lakes, and was advancing against Ticonderoga. This intelligence confirmed the opinion that the main object of Howe must be to effect a junction with Burgoyne on the North River. Under this impression, General Washington ordered Sullivan to Peekskill, and advanced, himself, first to Pompton Plains, and afterwards to the Clove, where he determined to remain until the views of the enemy should be disclosed.

In the middle of all this, they learned that Burgoyne had a large force on the lakes and was moving towards Ticonderoga. This information reinforced the belief that Howe's main goal was to join forces with Burgoyne on the North River. With this in mind, General Washington ordered Sullivan to Peekskill and moved himself first to Pompton Plains and then to the Clove, deciding to stay there until they could see the enemy's plans.

While the General thus anxiously watched the movements of his adversary, an agreeable and unexpected piece of intelligence was received from New England. The command of the British troops in Rhode Island had devolved on General Prescot. Thinking himself perfectly secure in an island, the water surrounding which was believed to be entirely guarded by his cruisers, and at the head of an army greatly superior to any force then collected in that department, he indulged himself in convenient quarters, rather distant from camp; and was remiss with respect to the guards about his person. Information of this negligence was communicated to the main, and a plan was formed to surprise him. This spirited enterprise was executed, with equal courage and address, by Lieutenant Colonel Barton of the Rhode Island militia.

While the General anxiously monitored the movements of his opponent, some welcome and surprising news came in from New England. The command of the British troops in Rhode Island had fallen to General Prescot. Feeling completely secure on an island that he believed was entirely protected by his cruisers, and leading an army much larger than any force then present in that area, he settled into comfortable quarters, quite a distance from camp, and became lax about the guards around him. This negligence was reported to the main forces, and a plan was devised to catch him off guard. This bold operation was carried out with equal bravery and skill by Lieutenant Colonel Barton of the Rhode Island militia.

General Prescot surprised and taken.

On the night of the 10th, he embarked on board four whale boats, at Warwick Neck, with a party consisting of about forty persons, including Captains Adams and Philips, and several other officers. After proceeding about ten miles by water, unobserved by the British guard-boats, although several ships of war lay in that quarter, he landed on the west of the island, about midway between Newport and Bristol ferry, and marching a mile to the quarters of Prescot, dexterously seized the sentinel at his door, and one of his aids. The general himself was taken out of bed, and conveyed to a place of safety.

On the night of the 10th, he set out on four whale boats from Warwick Neck, along with a group of about forty people, including Captains Adams and Philips, and several other officers. After traveling about ten miles by water, unnoticed by the British guard boats, even though several warships were in the area, he landed on the west side of the island, roughly halfway between Newport and Bristol ferry. Marching a mile to Prescot's quarters, he skillfully captured the sentinel at the door and one of his aides. The general himself was taken from his bed and moved to a safe location.

The success of this intrepid enterprise diffused the more joy throughout America, because it was supposed to secure the liberation of General Lee, by enabling General Washington to offer an officer of equal rank in exchange for him.

The success of this bold venture spread even more joy throughout America because it was believed to ensure General Lee's release by allowing General Washington to propose an officer of equal rank in return for him.

Congress expressed a high sense of the gallant conduct of Colonel Barton, and his party; and presented him with a sword as a mark of approbation.

Congress recognized the brave actions of Colonel Barton and his team, presenting him with a sword as a sign of approval.

As the fleet fell down towards Sandy Hook, General Washington withdrew slowly from the Clove, and disposed his army in different divisions, so as to march to any point which might be attacked.The British army embarks.

As the fleet headed towards Sandy Hook, General Washington slowly pulled back from the Clove and organized his army into different divisions, ready to march to any point that might be attacked.The British army sets off.

At length, the embarkation was completed, and the fleet put to sea.

At last, the boarding was finished, and the fleet set sail.


CHAPTER VIII.

General Washington commences his march to the Delaware.... Takes measures for checking Burgoyne.... British army lands at Elk River.... General Washington advances to Brandywine.... Retreat of Maxwell.... Defeat at Brandywine.... Slight skirmish near the White Horse, and retreat to French Creek.... General Wayne surprised.... General Howe takes possession of Philadelphia.... Removal of Congress to Lancaster.

General Washington starts his march to the Delaware.... He takes steps to stop Burgoyne.... The British army lands at Elk River.... General Washington moves towards Brandywine.... Maxwell retreats.... Defeat at Brandywine.... Minor skirmish near the White Horse and retreat to French Creek.... General Wayne is caught off guard.... General Howe occupies Philadelphia.... Congress is moved to Lancaster.

 

1777
July.
General Washington commences his march to the Delaware.

On receiving intelligence that the British fleet had sailed from New York, the American army commenced its march to the Delaware. About the time of its departure, a letter from Sir William Howe, directed to General Burgoyne at Quebec, was delivered to General Putnam by the person who had received it, as was said, for the purpose of carrying it to Quebec, and was transmitted by Putnam to the Commander-in-chief. In this letter, General Howe said that "he was exhibiting the appearance of moving to the southward, while his real intent was against Boston, from whence he would co-operate with the army of Canada." This stratagem entirely failed. General Washington, at once, perceived that the letter was written with a design that it should fall into his hands, and mislead him with respect to the views of the writer.

On receiving information that the British fleet had left New York, the American army began its march to the Delaware. Just as they were setting off, a letter from Sir William Howe, addressed to General Burgoyne in Quebec, was delivered to General Putnam by the person who was supposed to take it to Quebec. Putnam then forwarded it to the Commander-in-chief. In this letter, General Howe stated that "he was pretending to move southward, while his real plan was aimed at Boston, from where he would join forces with the army in Canada." This strategy completely backfired. General Washington immediately recognized that the letter was intended for him to find, meant to mislead him about the writer's intentions.

He takes measures for checking Burgoyne.

While the utmost vigilance and judgment were required to conduct the operations of the army under the immediate command of General Washington, the transactions in the north were too vitally interesting not to engage a large share of his attention. He not only hastened the march of those generals who were designed to act in that department, and pressed the governors of the eastern states to reinforce the retreating army with all their militia, but made large detachments of choice troops from his own;—thus weakening himself in order to strengthen other generals whose strength would be more useful. The fame of being himself the leader of the victorious army did not, with false glare, dazzle his judgment, or conceal the superior public advantage to be derived from defeating the plans of Burgoyne.

While extreme vigilance and judgment were necessary to manage the army under General Washington's direct command, the events in the north were too important to not capture a significant portion of his attention. He not only expedited the movements of the generals assigned to that region and urged the governors of the eastern states to support the retreating army with their militias, but he also sent significant detachments of his best troops from his own ranks—essentially weakening his forces to bolster other generals whose strength would be more beneficial. The allure of being the leader of the victorious army did not cloud his judgment or distract him from the greater public benefit that could come from thwarting Burgoyne's plans.

On the 30th of July, all doubts respecting the destination of the British fleet were supposed to be removed by its appearance off the capes of Delaware; and orders were immediately given for assembling the detached parts of the army in the neighbourhood of Philadelphia. Scarcely were these orders given, when the aspect of affairs was changed, and they were countermanded. An express from Cape May brought the information that the fleet had sailed out of the bay of Delaware, and was proceeding eastward. From this time, no intelligence respecting it was received until about the 7th of August, when it appeared a few leagues south of the capes of Delaware, after which it disappeared, and was not again seen until late in that month. The fact was, that on entering the capes of Delaware, the difficulties attending an attempt to carry his fleet up that bay and river, determined General Howe to relinquish his original design, and to transport his army to the Chesapeake. Contrary winds prevented his gaining the mouth of that bay until the 16th of August.

On July 30th, all doubts about the British fleet's destination seemed to be cleared up when it was spotted off the Delaware capes. Orders were quickly given to gather the army's separate units near Philadelphia. Just after these orders were issued, the situation changed, and they were canceled. A messenger from Cape May reported that the fleet had left the Delaware Bay and was heading east. From then on, no updates about it were received until around August 7th, when it appeared a few leagues south of the Delaware capes, after which it vanished and was not seen again until late in the month. The truth was, upon entering the Delaware capes, General Howe faced challenges with trying to take his fleet up that bay and river, which led him to abandon his original plan and instead move his army to the Chesapeake. Strong winds kept him from reaching the mouth of that bay until August 16th.

The several divisions of the army were immediately ordered[61] to unite in the neighbourhood of Philadelphia, and the militia of Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, and the northern counties of Virginia, were directed to take the field.

The different divisions of the army were quickly instructed[61] to come together near Philadelphia, and the militia from Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, and the northern counties of Virginia were ordered to mobilize.

British fleet comes up the Chesapeake and lands an army under Sir William Howe at Elk River.

The British fleet, after entering the Chesapeake, sailed up it with favourable winds, and entered Elk River, up which the admiral proceeded as high as it was safely navigable; and on the 25th of August the troops were landed at the ferry.

The British fleet, after entering the Chesapeake, sailed up it with good winds and entered Elk River, which the admiral navigated as far as it was safely possible; and on August 25th, the troops were landed at the ferry.

The British army, at its disembarkation, has been generally computed at eighteen thousand men. They were in good health and spirits, admirably supplied with all the implements of war, and led by an experienced general, of unquestionable military talents.

The British army, upon landing, is generally estimated to be eighteen thousand strong. They were in good health and high spirits, well-equipped with all the tools of warfare, and commanded by an experienced general with undeniable military skills.

General Washington advances to Brandywine.

The day before Sir William Howe landed, the American army marched through Philadelphia, and proceeded to the Brandywine. The divisions of Greene and Stephen were advanced nearer to the Head of Elk, and encamped behind White Clay creek.

The day before Sir William Howe arrived, the American army marched through Philadelphia and headed to Brandywine. The divisions of Greene and Stephen moved closer to the Head of Elk and set up camp behind White Clay Creek.

Congress had directed General Smallwood and Colonel Girt to take command of the militia of Maryland, who had been ordered by General Washington to assemble near the head of the bay. The militia of the lower counties of Delaware, commanded by General Rodney, were directed also to assemble in the British rear, and to co-operate with those of Maryland. Colonel Richardson's continental regiment, which had been stationed on the Eastern shore, was ordered to join this corps.

Congress had instructed General Smallwood and Colonel Girt to take charge of the Maryland militia, which had been ordered by General Washington to gather near the head of the bay. The militia from the lower counties of Delaware, led by General Rodney, was also directed to assemble behind the British and work together with the Maryland forces. Colonel Richardson's continental regiment, which had been stationed on the Eastern Shore, was ordered to join this group.

The militia of Pennsylvania, commanded by Major General Armstrong, were united with the main body of the army. Great exertions were used to bring them promptly into the field, and they came forward generally with some degree of alacrity. Although the numbers required by congress did not assemble, more appeared than could be armed.

The Pennsylvania militia, led by Major General Armstrong, joined the main force of the army. Significant efforts were made to get them into the field quickly, and they mostly stepped up with some enthusiasm. Even though the numbers needed by Congress didn’t come together, more of them showed up than could be equipped.

The real strength of the American army can not be accurately stated. It was estimated by Sir William Howe at fifteen thousand, including militia; and this estimate did not far exceed their real total, as exhibited by the returns. But it is a fact, attributable in some degree to the badness of their clothing, and scarcity of tents, and in some degree to the neglect of the commissary department, to provide those articles of food which contribute to the preservation of health, that the effective force was always far below the total number. The effectives, including militia, did not exceed eleven thousand.

The actual strength of the American army cannot be precisely determined. Sir William Howe estimated it at fifteen thousand, including the militia; and this estimate was close to their actual total, as shown by the records. However, it's a fact that, partly due to the poor quality of their clothing and lack of tents, and partly due to the commissary department's failure to provide necessary food items to maintain health, the effective force was always significantly lower than the total number. The effective troops, including the militia, did not exceed eleven thousand.

Morgan's regiment of riflemen having been detached to the northern army, a corps of light infantry was formed for the occasion, the command of which was given to General Maxwell. This corps was advanced to Iron Hill, about three miles in front of White Clay creek. The cavalry, consisting of four regiments, amounting to about nine hundred men, including persons of every description, were employed principally on the lines.

Morgan's riflemen were sent to the northern army, so a light infantry unit was created for this purpose, led by General Maxwell. This unit was moved to Iron Hill, roughly three miles in front of White Clay Creek. The cavalry, made up of four regiments with around nine hundred men from various backgrounds, was mainly used along the lines.

Lord Cornwallis attacks Maxwell's corps, and compels them to retreat.

One division of the British army, commanded by Sir William Howe in person, had taken post at Elkton, with its van advanced to Gray's Hill. General Knyphausen, with a second division, had crossed the ferry and encamped at Cecil Court House. He was directed to march up on the eastern side of the river, and to join Sir William Howe seven or eight miles south of Christiana. The intention to make this movement being disclosed by the preparatory arrangements, General Washington advised Maxwell to post a choice body of men in the night on an advantageous part of the road, in order to annoy him on his march. In the morning of the third of September, the two divisions under Lord Cornwallis and General Knyphausen, moved forward and formed a junction at Pencader, or Atkins' tavern, where they encamped. In their way, the column led by Lord Cornwallis fell in with and attacked Maxwell, who retreated over White Clay creek, with the loss of about forty killed and wounded.

One part of the British army, led by Sir William Howe himself, had set up camp at Elkton, with its front stationed at Gray's Hill. General Knyphausen, commanding another division, had crossed the ferry and set up camp at Cecil Court House. He was ordered to move up the eastern side of the river and meet up with Sir William Howe about seven or eight miles south of Christiana. Since this plan was revealed through the preparations, General Washington advised Maxwell to position a select group of men quietly at a strategic point along the road to disrupt the enemy's march. On the morning of September 3rd, the two divisions led by Lord Cornwallis and General Knyphausen advanced and joined forces at Pencader, or Atkins' tavern, where they set up camp. Along the way, the column led by Lord Cornwallis encountered and engaged Maxwell, who retreated across White Clay Creek, suffering around forty casualties.

September 5.

The whole American army, except the light infantry, took a position behind Red Clay creek, on the road leading from the camp of Sir William Howe to Philadelphia. On this ground, the General thought it probable that the fate of Philadelphia, and of the campaign, might be decided; and he resorted to all the means in his power to encourage his troops, and stimulate them to the greatest exertions.

The entire American army, except for the light infantry, took a position behind Red Clay Creek, along the road leading from Sir William Howe's camp to Philadelphia. The General believed that the outcome for Philadelphia and the campaign could be decided here, so he used every tool at his disposal to motivate his troops and push them to give their best effort.

September 8.

On the 8th of September, the British army was again put in motion. The main body advanced by Newark, upon the right of the Americans, and encamped within four miles of that place, extending its left still farther up the country. Meanwhile, a strong column made a show of attacking in front, and, after manoeuvring some time, halted at Milton, within two miles of the centre.

On September 8th, the British army moved again. The main force advanced through Newark, to the right of the Americans, and set up camp within four miles of that location, pushing its left even further inland. Meanwhile, a strong group pretended to attack from the front, and after maneuvering for a while, stopped at Milton, just two miles from the center.

September 9.

General Washington was soon convinced that the column in front was designed only to amuse, while the left should effect the principal and real object. Believing that object to be to turn his right, and cut off his communication with Philadelphia, he changed his ground, and, crossing the Brandywine early in the night, took post behind that river, at Chadd's Ford. General Maxwell was advanced in front, and placed, advantageously, on the hills south of the river, on the road leading over the ford. The militia, under General Armstrong, were posted at a ford two miles below Chadd's; and the right extended some miles above, with a view to other passes deemed less practicable. In this position, General Washington attended the movements of the adverse army.

General Washington quickly realized that the troops in front were meant to distract while the ones on the left aimed to achieve the main goal. Thinking that the goal was to flank his right and cut off his connection to Philadelphia, he changed his position, and crossed the Brandywine early in the night, taking a stand behind that river at Chadd's Ford. General Maxwell advanced in front and positioned himself advantageously on the hills south of the river, along the road leading over the ford. The militia, under General Armstrong, was stationed at a ford two miles below Chadd's, and the right extended several miles above, looking out for other crossings that were considered less feasible. In this setup, General Washington monitored the movements of the opposing army.

In the evening, Howe marched forward in two columns, which united, early the next morning, at Kennet's Square; after which he advanced parties on the roads leading to Lancaster, to Chadd's Ford, and to Wilmington.

In the evening, Howe moved ahead in two columns, which joined together early the next morning at Kennet's Square; after that, he sent out teams on the roads heading to Lancaster, Chadd's Ford, and Wilmington.

The armies were now within seven miles of each other, with only the Brandywine between them, which opposed no obstacle to a general engagement. This was sought by Howe, and not avoided by Washington. It was impossible to protect Philadelphia without a victory, and this object was deemed throughout America, and especially by congress, of such magnitude as to require that an action should be hazarded for its attainment.

The armies were now just seven miles apart, separated only by the Brandywine River, which posed no barrier to a full-scale battle. Howe was eager for this fight, and Washington didn’t shy away from it either. It was clear that protecting Philadelphia required a victory, and this goal was considered crucial across America, especially by Congress, making it necessary to take a risk to achieve it.

In the morning of the 11th, soon after day, information was received that the whole British army was in motion, advancing on the direct road leading over Chadd's Ford. The Americans were immediately under arms, and placed in order of battle, for the purpose of contesting the passage of the river. Skirmishing soon commenced between the advanced parties; and, by ten, Maxwell's corps, with little loss on either side, was driven over the Brandywine below the ford. Knyphausen, who commanded this column, paraded on the heights, reconnoitred the American army, and appeared to be making dispositions to force the passage of the river. A skirt of woods, with the river, divided him from Maxwell's corps, small parties of whom occasionally crossed over, and kept up a scattering fire, by which not much execution was done. At length one of these parties, led by Captains Waggoner and Porterfield, engaged the British flank guard very closely, killed a captain with ten or fifteen privates, drove them out of the wood, and were on the point of taking a field piece. The sharpness of the skirmish soon drew a large body of the British to that quarter, and the Americans were again driven over the Brandywine.[62]

On the morning of the 11th, shortly after daybreak, news came in that the entire British army was on the move, advancing along the main road over Chadd's Ford. The Americans quickly got ready and formed up for battle to defend the river crossing. Skirmishes began almost immediately between the frontline troops; by ten o'clock, Maxwell's corps had been pushed back over the Brandywine, with minimal losses on both sides. Knyphausen, who was in charge of this column, set up on the heights, surveyed the American forces, and seemed to be preparing to force the river crossing. A stretch of woods and the river separated him from Maxwell's corps, with small groups occasionally crossing to engage in some scattered firing, which didn’t cause much damage. Eventually, one of these groups, led by Captains Waggoner and Porterfield, got into a close fight with the British flank guard, killing a captain along with ten to fifteen soldiers, driving them out of the woods, and coming close to capturing a field piece. The intensity of the skirmish soon attracted a large number of British troops to that area, and the Americans were pushed back over the Brandywine again.[62]

About eleven in the morning, information reached General Washington that a large column with many field pieces, had taken a road leading from Kennet's Square, directly up the country, and had entered the great valley road, down which they were marching to the upper fords of the Brandywine. This information was given by Colonel Ross of Pennsylvania, who was in their rear, and estimated their numbers at five thousand men.

About eleven in the morning, General Washington learned that a large group with many artillery pieces had taken a road from Kennet's Square and was heading up into the countryside, entering the main valley road, where they were marching toward the upper fords of the Brandywine. This information was provided by Colonel Ross of Pennsylvania, who was trailing them and estimated their numbers at five thousand men.

On receiving this information, Washington is said to have determined to detach Sullivan and Lord Stirling to engage the left division of the British army, and with the residue of his troops, to cross Chadd's Ford in person, and attack Knyphausen. Before this plan could be executed, counter intelligence was received inducing an opinion that the movement of the British on their left was a feint, and that the column under Lord Cornwallis, after making demonstrations of crossing the Brandywine above its forks, had marched down the southern side of that river to reunite itself with Knyphausen.

Upon receiving this information, Washington reportedly decided to send Sullivan and Lord Stirling to engage the left side of the British army, while he would take the rest of his troops to cross Chadd's Ford himself and attack Knyphausen. Before this plan could be carried out, counterintelligence was received suggesting that the British movement on their left was a distraction, and that the column under Lord Cornwallis, after making it look like they would cross the Brandywine above its forks, had marched down the southern side of the river to reunite with Knyphausen.

Not long after the first communication was made by Colonel Ross, information was received from Colonel Bland of the cavalry, which produced some doubt respecting the strength of this column. He saw only two brigades; but the dust appeared to rise in their rear for a considerable distance. A major of the militia came in, who alleged that he left the forks of the Brandywine so late in the day that it was supposed Lord Cornwallis must have passed them by that time, had he continued his march in that direction, and who asserted that no enemy had appeared in that quarter. Some light horsemen who had been sent to reconnoitre the road, returned with the same information.

Not long after Colonel Ross made his first report, Colonel Bland from the cavalry sent information that raised some doubts about the strength of this column. He only saw two brigades, but there was a significant amount of dust rising behind them. A major from the militia arrived, claiming he left the forks of the Brandywine so late in the day that it was believed Lord Cornwallis must have passed through by that time if he had continued marching in that direction, and he insisted that no enemy had been seen in that area. Some light horsemen sent to scout the road returned with the same information.

The uncertainty produced by this contradictory intelligence was at length removed; and about two in the afternoon, it was ascertained that the column led by Lord Cornwallis, after making a circuit of about seventeen miles, had crossed the river above its forks, and was advancing in great force.

The confusion caused by this conflicting information was finally cleared up; and around two in the afternoon, it was confirmed that the group led by Lord Cornwallis, after taking a detour of about seventeen miles, had crossed the river upstream of its forks and was moving forward with a large force.

A change of disposition was immediately made. The divisions commanded by Sullivan, Stirling, and Stephen, took new ground, advanced farther up the Brandywine, and fronted the British column marching down that river. The division commanded by Wayne remained at Chadd's Ford, to keep Knyphausen in check; in which service Maxwell was to co-operate. Greene's division, accompanied by General Washington in person, formed a reserve, and took a central position between the right and left wings.

A change in strategy was quickly implemented. The divisions led by Sullivan, Stirling, and Stephen took new positions, moved further up the Brandywine, and faced the British forces marching down that river. Wayne's division stayed at Chadd's Ford to keep Knyphausen under control, with Maxwell assisting in that effort. Greene's division, with General Washington himself, served as a reserve and took a central position between the right and left flanks.

The divisions detached against Lord Cornwallis formed hastily on an advantageous piece of ground, above Birmingham Meeting House, with their left near the Brandywine, and having both flanks covered by a thick wood. The artillery was judiciously posted, and the disposition of the whole was well made. Unfortunately, Sullivan's division, in taking its ground, made too large a circuit, and was scarcely formed when the attack commenced.

The units that separated to face Lord Cornwallis quickly set up on a good piece of land above Birmingham Meeting House, with their left side close to the Brandywine River, and both sides protected by a dense forest. The artillery was strategically placed, and the overall arrangement was solid. Unfortunately, Sullivan's unit took a detour that was too large to get into position, and they had barely finished setting up when the attack started.

The American army defeated at Brandywine, and retreat to Chester.

On perceiving the Americans, the British army was formed in order of battle; and, about half past four, the action began. It was kept up warmly for some time. The American right first gave way, and by its flight exposed the flank of the remaining divisions to a galling fire. The line continued to break from the right, and, in a short time, was completely routed. The right wing made some attempts to rally, but, being briskly charged, again broke, and the flight became general.

Upon spotting the Americans, the British army lined up for battle, and around 4:30 PM, the action started. It was intense for a while. The American right side broke first, and their retreat put the remaining divisions at risk of a heavy attack. The line kept breaking from the right, and soon it was completely defeated. The right wing tried to regroup, but after a sharp charge, they broke again, leading to a full-scale retreat.

On the commencement of the action on the right, General Washington pressed forward with Greene, to the support of that wing; but, before his arrival, its rout was complete, and he could only check the pursuit. For this purpose, the 10th Virginia regiment commanded by Colonel Stevens, and a regiment of Pennsylvania commanded by Colonel Stewart, neither of which had been in action, were posted advantageously on the road taken by the defeated army. The impression made by the fire of these regiments, and the approach of night, induced Sir William Howe, after dispersing them, to give over the pursuit.

When the action on the right began, General Washington rushed forward with Greene to support that side; however, by the time he arrived, it was already a complete rout, and he could only stop the chase. To do this, he positioned the 10th Virginia regiment led by Colonel Stevens and a Pennsylvania regiment commanded by Colonel Stewart, neither of which had been in battle, advantageously on the route taken by the defeated army. The impact of these regiments' fire and the coming of night led Sir William Howe, after scattering them, to stop the pursuit.

When the American right was found to be fully engaged with Lord Cornwallis, Knyphausen made real dispositions for crossing the river. Chadd's Ford was defended by an intrenchment and battery, with three field pieces, and a howitzer. After some resistance, the work was forced; and, the defeat of the right being known, the left wing also withdrew from its ground. The whole army retreated that night to Chester, and the next day to Philadelphia.

When the American right was fully engaged with Lord Cornwallis, Knyphausen made plans to cross the river. Chadd's Ford was defended by a trench and a battery, with three field guns and a howitzer. After some resistance, the position was breached; and, once the defeat of the right was known, the left wing also withdrew from its position. The entire army retreated that night to Chester, and the next day to Philadelphia.

The loss sustained by the Americans in this action has been estimated at three hundred killed, and six hundred wounded. Between three and four hundred, principally the wounded, were made prisoners.

The Americans lost an estimated three hundred killed and six hundred wounded in this action. Between three and four hundred, mostly the wounded, were taken prisoner.

As must ever be the case in new raised armies, unused to danger, and from which undeserving officers have not been expelled, their conduct was not uniform. Some regiments, especially those which had served the preceding campaign, maintained their ground with the firmness and intrepidity of veterans, while others gave way as soon as they were pressed. The authors of a very correct history of the war,[63] speaking of this action, say, "a part of their troops, among whom were particularly numbered some Virginia[64] regiments, and the whole corps of artillery, behaved exceedingly well in some of the actions of this day, exhibiting a degree of order, firmness, and resolution, and preserving such a countenance in extremely sharp service, as would not have discredited veterans. Some other bodies of their troops behaved very badly."[65]

As is often the case with newly formed armies that are inexperienced with danger and from which unworthy officers haven't been dismissed, their performance varied. Some regiments, particularly those that had fought in the previous campaign, stood their ground with the steadiness and bravery of seasoned soldiers, while others fell apart when faced with pressure. The authors of a very accurate history of the war,[63] mention this event, stating, "some of their troops, especially certain Virginia[64] regiments and the entire artillery corps, performed exceptionally well in several actions on this day, showing remarkable order, composure, and determination, and maintaining such a demeanor under intense pressure that would have made any veteran proud. Other units, however, did not perform well at all."[65]

The official letter of Sir William Howe stated his loss at rather less than one hundred killed, and four hundred wounded. As the Americans sustained very little injury in the retreat, this inequality of loss can be ascribed only to the inferiority of their arms. Many of their muskets were scarcely fit for service; and, being of unequal calibre, their cartridges could not be so well fitted, and, consequently, their fire could not do as much execution as that of the enemy. This radical defect was felt in all the operations of the army.

The official letter from Sir William Howe reported his losses at just under one hundred killed and four hundred wounded. Since the Americans experienced very few casualties during the retreat, this disparity in losses can be attributed solely to the inferiority of their weapons. Many of their muskets were barely serviceable; and, due to differences in caliber, their cartridges couldn't be properly fitted, which meant their firepower wasn't as effective as that of the enemy. This fundamental issue impacted all the army's operations.

From the ardour with which the Commander-in-chief had inspired his troops before this action, it is probable that the conflict would have been more severe, had the intelligence respecting the movement on the left of the British army been less contradictory. Raw troops, changing their ground in the moment of action, and attacked in the agitation of moving, are easily thrown into confusion. This was the critical situation of a part of Sullivan's division, and was the cause of the right's breaking before Greene could be brought up to support it; after which, it was impossible to retrieve the fortune of the day.

From the enthusiasm with which the Commander-in-Chief had motivated his troops before this battle, it's likely that the fight would have been tougher if the information about the movement on the left side of the British army hadn't been so mixed. Inexperienced soldiers, shifting their position in the heat of battle and getting attacked while in motion, can easily become disorganized. This was the critical situation for part of Sullivan's division, which led to the right flank collapsing before Greene could arrive to support it; after that, it was impossible to turn the tide of the day.

But had the best disposition of the troops been made at the time, which subsequent intelligence would suggest, the action could not have terminated in favour of the Americans. Their inferiority in numbers, in discipline, and in arms, was too great to leave them a probable prospect of victory. A battle, however, was not to be avoided. The opinion of the public, and of congress, demanded it. The loss of Philadelphia, without an attempt to preserve it, would have excited discontents which, in the United States, might be productive of serious mischief; and action, though attended with defeat, provided the loss be not too great, must improve an army in which, not only the military talents, but even the courage, of officers, some of them of high rank, remained to be ascertained.

But if the troops had been better organized at the time, as later information would suggest, the outcome wouldn't have favored the Americans. Their disadvantages in numbers, training, and weaponry were too significant to leave them with a real chance of winning. However, a battle couldn't be avoided. Public opinion and Congress demanded it. Losing Philadelphia without even trying to defend it would have caused unrest that could lead to serious issues in the United States. Taking action, even if it ended in defeat—as long as the losses weren't too severe—would help strengthen an army where the military skills and even the courage of some high-ranking officers still needed to be proven.

Among the wounded was the Marquis de la Fayette, and Brigadier General Woodford.

Among the injured were the Marquis de la Fayette and Brigadier General Woodford.

The battle of Brandywine was not considered as decisive by congress, the General, or the army. The opinion was carefully cherished that the British had gained only the ground; and that their loss was still more considerable than had been sustained by the Americans. Congress appeared determined to risk another battle for the metropolis of America. Far from discovering any intention to change their place of session, they passed vigorous resolutions for reinforcing the army, and directed General Washington to give the necessary orders for completing the defences of the Delaware.

The battle of Brandywine was not viewed as a decisive victory by Congress, the General, or the army. They held the firm belief that the British had only gained territory, and their losses were even greater than those of the Americans. Congress seemed intent on risking another battle for the capital of America. Instead of showing any signs of relocating their sessions, they passed strong resolutions to reinforce the army and directed General Washington to take the necessary steps to complete the defenses of the Delaware.

September 12.

From Chester, the army marched through Darby, over the Schuylkill bridge, to its former ground, near the falls of that river. General Greene's division, which, having been less in action, was more entire than any other, covered the rear; and the corps of Maxwell remained at Chester until the next day, as a rallying point for the small parties, and straggling soldiers, who might yet be in the neighbourhood.

From Chester, the army marched through Darby, over the Schuylkill bridge, to its previous position near the falls of that river. General Greene's division, which had seen less action, was more complete than the others and covered the rear; while Maxwell's corps stayed in Chester until the next day, acting as a gathering point for the small groups and stray soldiers who might still be in the area.

Having allowed his army one day for repose and refreshment, General Washington recrossed the Schuylkill, and proceeded on the Lancaster road, with the intention of risking another engagement.

Having given his army a day to rest and recover, General Washington crossed the Schuylkill again and headed down the Lancaster road, planning to risk another battle.

Sir William Howe passed the night of the 11th on the field of battle. On the succeeding day, he detached Major General Grant with two brigades to Concord meeting-house; and on the 13th, Lord Cornwallis joined General Grant, and marched towards Chester. Another detachment took possession of Wilmington; to which place the sick and wounded were conveyed.

Sir William Howe spent the night of the 11th on the battlefield. The next day, he sent Major General Grant with two brigades to Concord meeting-house; and on the 13th, Lord Cornwallis joined General Grant and marched towards Chester. Another group took control of Wilmington, where the sick and wounded were taken.

To prevent a sudden movement to Philadelphia by the lower road, the bridge over the Schuylkill was loosened from its moorings, and General Armstrong was directed, with the Pennsylvania militia to guard the passes over that river.

To stop a sudden move to Philadelphia along the lower road, the bridge over the Schuylkill was unfastened from its moorings, and General Armstrong was assigned, along with the Pennsylvania militia, to oversee the crossings of that river.

On the 15th, the American army, intending to gain the left of the British, reached the Warren tavern, on the Lancaster road, twenty-three miles from Philadelphia. Intelligence was received, early next morning, that Howe was approaching in two columns. It being too late to reach the ground he had intended to occupy, Washington resolved to meet and engage him in front.

On the 15th, the American army, planning to flank the British, arrived at the Warren tavern on the Lancaster road, twenty-three miles from Philadelphia. Early the next morning, they learned that Howe was advancing in two columns. Since it was too late to get to the position he had planned to take, Washington decided to confront him directly.

September 16.

Both armies prepared, with great alacrity, for battle. The advanced parties had met, and were beginning to skirmish, when they were separated by a heavy rain, which, becoming more and more violent, rendered the retreat of the Americans a measure of absolute necessity. The inferiority of their arms never brought them into such imminent peril as on this occasion. Their gun-locks not being well secured, their muskets soon became unfit for use. Their cartridge-boxes had been so inartificially constructed, as not to protect their ammunition from the tempest. Their cartridges were soon damaged; and this mischief was the more serious, because very many of the soldiers were without bayonets.

Both armies quickly got ready for battle. The front lines had clashed and were starting to skirmish when a heavy rain came down, separating them. As the rain got worse, the Americans really had no choice but to retreat. Their inferior weapons put them in a situation of serious danger this time. Since their gun locks weren't secured properly, their muskets quickly became unusable. Their cartridge boxes were poorly made, so they couldn't keep their ammo safe from the storm. The cartridges got damaged pretty quickly, and this was especially troublesome because many of the soldiers didn’t have bayonets.

After a slight skirmish compelled again to retire, cross the Schuylkill, and proceed to French Creek.

The army being thus rendered unfit for action, the design of giving battle was reluctantly abandoned, and a retreat commenced. It was continued all the day, and great part of the night, through a cold and most distressing rain, and very deep roads. A few hours before day, the troops halted at the Yellow Springs, where their arms and ammunition were examined, and the alarming fact was disclosed, that scarcely a musket in a regiment could be discharged, and scarcely one cartridge in a box was fit for use. This state of things suggested the precaution of moving to a still greater distance, in order to refit their arms, obtain a fresh supply of ammunition, and revive the spirits of the army. The General therefore retired to Warwick furnace, on the south branch of French Creek, where ammunition and a few muskets might be obtained in time to dispute the passage of the Schuylkill, and make yet another effort to save Philadelphia.

The army was no longer fit for action, so the plan to give battle was reluctantly dropped, and a retreat began. This continued throughout the day and into much of the night, through cold, pouring rain and very muddy roads. A few hours before dawn, the troops stopped at the Yellow Springs, where they checked their weapons and ammunition. It was alarming to find that hardly any musket in the regiment could be fired, and barely any cartridges in a box were usable. This situation prompted the need to move even further to restock their weapons, get fresh ammunition, and boost the morale of the army. The General therefore pulled back to Warwick Furnace, on the south branch of French Creek, where they might be able to get ammunition and a few muskets in time to defend the passage of the Schuylkill and make one more attempt to save Philadelphia.

The extreme severity of the weather had entirely stopped the British army. During two days, General Howe made no other movement than to unite his columns.

The intense severity of the weather completely halted the British army. For two days, General Howe did nothing but bring his troops together.

From French Creek, General Wayne was detached with his division, into the rear of the British, with orders to join General Smallwood; and, carefully concealing himself and his movements, to seize every occasion which this march might offer, of engaging them to advantage. Meanwhile, General Washington crossed the Schuylkill at Parker's ferry, and encamped on both sides of Perkyomy Creek.

From French Creek, General Wayne was assigned to move with his division to the rear of the British and join General Smallwood. He was instructed to carefully hide his position and movements, taking advantage of any opportunity that might arise during this march to engage the enemy effectively. Meanwhile, General Washington crossed the Schuylkill at Parker's Ferry and set up camp on both sides of Perkyomy Creek.

September 19.
General Wayne surprised, and after a sharp action compelled to retreat.

General Wayne lay in the woods near the entrance of the road from Darby into that leading to Lancaster, about three miles in the rear of the left wing of the British troops encamped at Trydruffin, where he believed himself to be perfectly secure. But the country was so extensively disaffected that Sir William Howe received accurate accounts of his position and of his force. Major General Gray was detached to surprise him, and effectually accomplished his purpose. About eleven, in the night of the 20th, his pickets, driven in with charged bayonets, gave the first intimation of Gray's approach. Wayne instantly formed his division; and while his right sustained a fierce assault, directed a retreat by the left, under cover of a few regiments who, for a short time, withstood the violence of the shock. In his letter to the Commander-in-chief, he says that they gave the assailants some well-directed fires which must have done considerable execution; and that, after retreating from the ground on which the engagement commenced, they formed again, at a small distance from the scene of action; but that both parties drew off without renewing the conflict. He states his loss at about one hundred and fifty[66] killed and wounded. The British accounts admit, on their part, a loss of only seven.

General Wayne was lying in the woods near the road from Darby leading to Lancaster, about three miles behind the left wing of the British troops camped at Trydruffin, where he thought he was completely safe. However, the area was so largely hostile that Sir William Howe received accurate reports on his position and strength. Major General Gray was sent to surprise him and successfully accomplished his mission. Around eleven at night on the 20th, Wayne's pickets, driven in with bayonets drawn, were the first sign of Gray's approach. Wayne quickly organized his division; while his right faced a heavy attack, he ordered a retreat to the left, covered by a few regiments that held off the attackers for a short time. In a letter to the Commander-in-chief, he mentioned that they fired well-directed shots that likely caused significant damage; after retreating from the battlefield, they regrouped a little distance away, but both sides withdrew without continuing the fight. He reported his losses at about one hundred and fifty killed and wounded. The British reports, on their side, acknowledged only a loss of seven.

When the attack commenced, General Smallwood, who was on his march to join Wayne, a circumstance entirely unexpected by General Gray, was within less than a mile of him; and, had he commanded regulars, might have given a very different turn to the night. But his militia thought only of their own safety; and, having fallen in with a party returning from the pursuit of Wayne, fled in confusion with the loss of only one man.

When the attack started, General Smallwood, who was on his way to join Wayne—a situation that General Gray did not anticipate—was less than a mile away from him. If he had led regular troops, the night could have turned out very differently. However, his militia was only concerned about their own safety; after encountering a group coming back from chasing Wayne, they ran away in panic, losing only one man.

Some severe animadversions on this unfortunate affair having been made in the army, General Wayne demanded a court martial, which, after investigating his conduct, was unanimously of opinion, "that he had done every thing to be expected from an active, brave, and vigilant officer;" and acquitted him with honour.

Some serious criticisms about this unfortunate situation arose in the army, leading General Wayne to request a court-martial. After looking into his actions, the court concluded unanimously that he had done everything expected of an active, brave, and vigilant officer, and acquitted him with honor.

September 21.

Having secured his rear, by compelling Wayne to take a greater distance, Sir William Howe marched along the valley road to the Schuylkill, and encamped on the bank of that river, from the Fatland ford up to French Creek, along the front of the American army. To secure his right from being turned, General Washington again changed his position, and encamped with his left near, but above the British right.

Having secured his back by making Wayne move further away, Sir William Howe marched along the valley road to the Schuylkill, and set up camp on the riverbank, from the Fatland ford up to French Creek, facing the American army. To protect his right flank from being outflanked, General Washington changed his position again and camped with his left side close to, but above, the British right.

Washington marches to Pottsgrove.
September 22.

General Howe now relinquished his plan of bringing Washington to another battle; and, thinking it adviseable, perhaps, to transfer the seat of war to the neighbourhood of his ships, determined to cross the Schuylkill, and take possession of Philadelphia. In the afternoon, he ordered one detachment to cross at Fatland ford which was on his right, and another to cross at Gordon's ford, on his left, and to take possession of the heights commanding them. These orders were executed without much difficulty, and the American troops placed to defend these fords were easily dispersed.

General Howe abandoned his plan to engage Washington in another battle and, thinking it might be wise to move the war closer to his ships, decided to cross the Schuylkill River and take control of Philadelphia. In the afternoon, he ordered one group to cross at Fatland Ford on his right and another to cross at Gordon's Ford on his left, with instructions to secure the heights that overlooked them. These orders were carried out without much trouble, and the American troops set to defend these fords were quickly defeated.

This service being effected, the whole army marched by its right, about midnight, and crossing at Fatland without opposition, proceeded a considerable distance towards Philadelphia, and encamped, with its left near Sweed's ford, and its right on the Manatawny road, having Stony run in its front.

This service completed, the entire army marched to the right around midnight, crossed at Fatland without any resistance, and advanced a good distance toward Philadelphia. They set up camp, with the left side near Sweed's Ford and the right along the Manatawny Road, having Stony Run in front of them.

It was now apparent that only immediate victory could save Philadelphia from the grasp of the British general, whose situation gave him the option of either taking possession of that place, or endeavouring to bring on another engagement. If, therefore, a battle must certainly be risked to save the capital, it would be necessary to attack the enemy.

It was clear now that only a quick victory could rescue Philadelphia from the hold of the British general, who had the choice of either seizing the city or trying to provoke another fight. So, if a battle had to be risked to save the capital, it was essential to strike first at the enemy.

Public opinion, which a military chief finds too much difficulty in resisting, and the opinion of congress required a battle; but, on a temperate consideration of circumstances, Washington came to the wise decision of avoiding one for the present.

Public opinion, which a military leader finds hard to ignore, along with Congress's opinion, called for a battle. However, after calmly assessing the situation, Washington wisely decided to avoid one for now.

His reasons for this decision were conclusive. Wayne and Smallwood had not yet joined the army. The continental troops ordered from Peekskill, who had been detained for a time by an incursion from New York, were approaching; and a reinforcement of Jersey militia, under General Dickenson, was also expected.

His reasons for this decision were solid. Wayne and Smallwood hadn’t joined the army yet. The continental troops summoned from Peekskill, who had been held up for a while by an incursion from New York, were on their way; and a backup of Jersey militia, led by General Dickenson, was also anticipated.

To these powerful motives against risking an engagement, other considerations of great weight were added, founded on the condition of his soldiers. An army, manoeuvring in an open country, in the face of a very superior enemy, is unavoidably exposed to excessive fatigue, and extreme hardship. The effect of these hardships was much increased by the privations under which the American troops suffered. While in almost continual motion, wading deep rivers, and encountering every vicissitude of the seasons, they were without tents, nearly without shoes, or winter clothes, and often without food.

To these strong reasons against risking an engagement, other important considerations were added, based on the state of his soldiers. An army moving through open country, facing a much stronger enemy, is inevitably subjected to extreme fatigue and hardship. The impact of these difficulties was made even worse by the deprivations the American troops endured. While constantly on the move, crossing deep rivers, and dealing with all kinds of weather, they were without tents, almost without shoes or winter clothes, and often without food.

A council of war concurred in the opinion the Commander-in-chief had formed, not to march against the enemy, but to allow his harassed troops a few days for repose, and to remain on his present ground until the expected reinforcements should arrive.

A war council agreed with the Commander-in-chief’s decision not to march against the enemy, but to give his tired troops a few days to rest and to stay in their current position until the expected reinforcements arrived.

Immediately after the battle of Brandywine, the distressed situation of the army had been represented to congress, who had recommended it to the executive of Pennsylvania to seize the cloths and other military stores in the ware houses of Philadelphia, and, after granting certificates expressing their value, to convey them to a place of safety. The executive, being unwilling to encounter the odium of this strong measure, advised that the extraordinary powers of the Commander-in-chief should be used on the occasion. Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton, one of the General's aids, a young gentleman already in high estimation for his talents and zeal, was employed on this delicate business. "Your own prudence," said the General, in a letter to him while in Philadelphia, "will point out the least exceptionable means to be pursued; but remember, delicacy and a strict adherence to the ordinary mode of application must give place to our necessities. We must, if possible, accommodate the soldiers with such articles as they stand in need of, or we shall have just reason to apprehend the most injurious and alarming consequences from the approaching season."

Immediately after the Battle of Brandywine, the army's tough situation was brought to Congress's attention, who recommended that the Pennsylvania executive take control of the uniforms and other military supplies in the warehouses of Philadelphia and, after issuing certificates to confirm their value, send them to a safe place. The executive, not wanting to face the backlash from this strong action, suggested that the extraordinary powers of the Commander-in-Chief should be utilized. Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton, one of the General's aides, a young man already highly regarded for his skills and enthusiasm, was tasked with this sensitive job. "Your own judgment," the General wrote to him while in Philadelphia, "will guide you in choosing the least controversial means to achieve this; but keep in mind that delicacy and a strict adherence to the usual methods of request must give way to our urgent needs. We must, if possible, provide the soldiers with the supplies they need, or we will have legitimate reasons to fear severe and alarming consequences from the coming season."

All the efforts, however, of this very active officer could not obtain a supply, in any degree, adequate to the pressing and increasing wants of the army.

All the efforts of this very active officer couldn't secure a supply that was anywhere near enough for the urgent and growing needs of the army.

General Howe takes possession of Philadelphia.
Congress removes to Lancaster.

Colonel Hamilton was also directed to cause the military stores which had been previously collected to a large amount in Philadelphia, and the vessels which were lying at the wharves, to be removed up the Delaware. This duty was executed with so much vigilance, that very little public property fell, with the city, into the hands of the British general, who entered it on the 26th of September. The members of congress separated on the eighteenth, in the evening, and reassembled at Lancaster on the twenty-seventh of the same month.

Colonel Hamilton was instructed to have the military supplies that had been gathered in Philadelphia, as well as the ships at the docks, moved up the Delaware River. This task was carried out so diligently that very little public property was lost to the British general when he took over the city on September 26th. The members of Congress parted ways on the evening of the 18th and came back together in Lancaster on the 27th of that month.

From the 25th of August, when the British army landed at the Head of Elk, until the 26th of September when it entered Philadelphia, the campaign had been active, and the duties of the American general uncommonly arduous. The best English writers bestow high encomiums on Sir William Howe for his military skill, and masterly movements during this period. At Brandywine especially, Washington is supposed to have been "outgeneraled, more outgeneraled than in any action during the war." If all the operations of this trying period be examined, and the means in possession of both be considered, the American chief will appear, in no respect, inferior to his adversary, or unworthy of the high place assigned to him in the opinions of his countrymen. With an army decidedly inferior, not only in numbers, but in every military requisite except courage, in an open country, he employed his enemy near thirty days in advancing about sixty miles. In this time he fought one general action; and, though defeated, was able to reassemble the same undisciplined, unclothed, and almost unfed army; and, the fifth day afterwards, again to offer battle. When the armies were separated by a storm which involved him in the most distressing circumstances, he extricated himself from them, and still maintained a respectable and imposing countenance.

From August 25th, when the British army landed at the Head of Elk, until September 26th when it entered Philadelphia, the campaign was active, and the American general faced unusually tough challenges. Leading English writers praise Sir William Howe for his military skill and masterful maneuvers during this time. At Brandywine in particular, Washington is believed to have been "outgeneraled, more outgeneraled than in any action during the war." However, if we examine all the operations during this difficult period, taking into account the resources available to both sides, the American leader appears to be no less capable than his opponent, or unworthy of the high regard in which he is held by his fellow countrymen. Despite commanding an army that was clearly smaller, not just in numbers but in every military necessity except bravery, he managed to keep his enemy engaged for nearly thirty days while advancing about sixty miles. During this time, he fought one major battle; although he was defeated, he was able to regroup the same undisciplined, poorly equipped, and almost starving army, and just five days later, he offered battle again. Even when a storm separated the armies and put him in extremely challenging circumstances, he managed to extricate himself and still maintained a respectable and imposing presence.

The only advantage he is supposed to have given was at the battle of Brandywine; and that was produced by the contrariety and uncertainty of the intelligence received. A general must be governed by his intelligence, and must regulate his measures by his information. It is his duty to obtain correct information; and among the most valuable traits of a military character, is the skill to select those means which will obtain it. Yet the best selected means are not always successful; and, in a new army, where military talent has not been well tried by the standard of experience, the general is peculiarly exposed to the chance of employing not the best instruments. In a country, too, which is covered with wood, precise information of the numbers composing different columns is to be gained with difficulty.

The only advantage he is said to have provided was at the Battle of Brandywine; and that came from the conflicting and uncertain information received. A general must rely on his intelligence and adjust his strategies based on the information at hand. It’s his responsibility to gather accurate information; one of the most valuable skills in a military leader is knowing how to acquire it. However, even the best methods for obtaining information don’t always succeed; and in a new army, where military talent hasn’t been tested by experience, a general is especially vulnerable to using ineffective resources. In a country filled with woods, getting precise information about the numbers in different groups is quite challenging.

It has been said "that the Americans do not appear to have made all the use that might be expected of the advantages which the country afforded for harassing and impeding the British army."

It has been said "that the Americans don't seem to have fully utilized the advantages that the country provided for harassing and hindering the British army."

In estimating this objection, it ought to be recollected that General Smallwood was directed, with the militia of Maryland and Delaware, supported by a regiment of continental troops, to hang on and harass the rear of the enemy: that General Maxwell, with a select corps consisting of a thousand men, was ordered to seize every occasion to annoy him on his march: that General Wayne, with his division, was afterwards detached to unite with Smallwood, and command the whole force collected in the rear, which would have been very respectable.

In considering this objection, it should be remembered that General Smallwood was instructed, along with the militia from Maryland and Delaware and supported by a regiment of Continental troops, to stay back and disrupt the enemy's rear. General Maxwell, leading a special group of a thousand men, was ordered to take every opportunity to harass him during his march. Then, General Wayne was later sent to join Smallwood and lead the entire force gathered in the rear, which would have been quite significant.

If the militia did not assemble in the numbers expected, or effect the service allotted to them, their failure is not attributable to General Washington. His calls on them had been early and energetic; and the state of his army did not admit of his making larger detachments from it to supply the place they had been designed to fill.

If the militia didn't gather in the expected numbers or perform the duties assigned to them, their failure isn't General Washington's fault. He had reached out to them early and with urgency; and the condition of his army didn't allow him to pull larger units from it to replace the roles they were meant to fulfill.

Loud complaints had been made against General Maxwell by the officers of his corps; and a court was ordered to inquire into his conduct, by whom he was acquitted. Whether that officer omitted to seize the proper occasions to annoy the enemy, or the cautious and compact movements of Sir William Howe afforded none, can not be easily ascertained. General Washington felt the loss of Morgan, and wrote pressingly to Gates, after his success against Burgoyne, to restore him that officer, with his regiment, as soon as possible.

Loud complaints had been made against General Maxwell by the officers of his corps, and a court was called to investigate his conduct, by which he was found not guilty. It's hard to tell whether he missed chances to harass the enemy or if Sir William Howe's careful and tight movements didn’t provide any. General Washington felt the absence of Morgan and urgently wrote to Gates after his victory over Burgoyne, asking him to return that officer and his regiment as soon as possible.


CHAPTER IX.

Measures to cut off the communication between the British army and fleet.... Battle of Germantown.... Measures to intercept supplies to Philadelphia.... Attack on fort Mifflin.... On Red Bank.... The Augusta blows up.... Fort Mifflin evacuated.... Fort Mercer evacuated.... The British open the communication with their fleet.... Washington urged to attack Philadelphia.... General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill.... Returns to Philadelphia.... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

Steps to disrupt communication between the British army and navy.... Battle of Germantown.... Actions taken to block supplies to Philadelphia.... Assault on Fort Mifflin.... At Red Bank.... The Augusta explodes.... Fort Mifflin is abandoned.... Fort Mercer is evacuated.... The British restore communication with their navy.... Washington is encouraged to attack Philadelphia.... General Howe moves out to Chestnut Hill.... Returns to Philadelphia.... General Washington goes into winter quarters.

 

1777
September.
Measures taken to prevent a communication between the British army in Philadelphia and their fleet.

Philadelphia being lost, General Washington sought to make its occupation inconvenient and insecure, by rendering it inaccessible to the British fleet. With this design, works had been erected on a low marshy island in the Delaware, near the junction of the Schuylkill, which, from the nature of its soil, was called Mud Island. On the opposite shore of Jersey, at a place called Red Bank, a fort had also been constructed which was defended with heavy artillery. In the deep channel between, or under cover of these batteries, several ranges of frames had been sunk, to which, from their resemblance to that machine, the name of chevaux-de-frise had been given. These frames were so strong and heavy as to be destructive of any ship which might strike against them, and were sunk in such a depth of water as rendered it equally difficult to weigh them or cut them through; no attempt to raise them, or to open the channel in any manner could be successful until the command of the shores on both sides should be obtained.

Philly having been lost, General Washington aimed to make its occupation uncomfortable and uncertain by making it hard for the British fleet to access. To achieve this, defenses were built on a low, swampy island in the Delaware, near where it meets the Schuylkill, which was called Mud Island due to its soil. On the New Jersey side, at a spot known as Red Bank, a fort was also built and armed with heavy artillery. In the deep channel between these two positions, several rows of frames were sunk, which were named chevaux-de-frise because they resembled that machine. These frames were so sturdy and heavy that any ship that struck them would be destroyed, and they were sunk in such deep water that it was equally difficult to raise them or cut through them. No efforts to remove them or to clear the channel could succeed until control of the shores on both sides was established.

Other ranges of these machines had been sunk about three miles lower down the river; and some considerable works were in progress at Billingsport on the Jersey side, which were in such forwardness as to be provided with artillery. These works and machines were farther supported by several galleys mounting heavy cannon, together with two floating batteries, a number of armed vessels, and some fire ships.

Other groups of these machines had been set up about three miles further down the river, and significant work was underway at Billingsport on the New Jersey side, which was advanced enough to be equipped with artillery. These installations and machines were also backed by several galleys with heavy cannons, along with two floating batteries, a number of armed ships, and some fire ships.

The present relative situation of the armies gave a decisive importance to these works. Cutting off the communication of General Howe with his fleet, they prevented his receiving supplies by water, while the American vessels in the river above fort Mifflin, the name given to the fort on Mud Island, rendered it difficult to forage in Jersey, General Washington hoped to render his supplies on the side of Pennsylvania so precarious, as to compel him to evacuate Philadelphia.

The current situation of the armies made these efforts crucial. By cutting off General Howe's connection with his fleet, they stopped him from getting supplies by sea. Meanwhile, the American ships in the river above Fort Mifflin—located on Mud Island—made it hard to gather resources in Jersey. General Washington aimed to make his supply lines in Pennsylvania so unreliable that it would force Howe to abandon Philadelphia.

The advantages of this situation were considerably diminished by the capture of the Delaware frigate.

The benefits of this situation were significantly reduced by the capture of the Delaware frigate.

September 27.

The day after Lord Cornwallis entered Philadelphia, three batteries were commenced for the purpose of acting against any American ships which might appear before the town. While yet incomplete, they were attacked by two frigates, assisted by several galleys and gondolas. The Delaware, being left by the tide while engaged with the battery, grounded and was captured; soon after which, the smaller frigate, and the other vessels, retired under the guns of the fort. This circumstance was the more interesting, as it gave the British General the command of the ferry, and, consequently, free access to Jersey, and enabled him to intercept the communication between the forts below, and Trenton, from which place the garrisons were to have drawn their military stores.

The day after Lord Cornwallis arrived in Philadelphia, three artillery batteries were set up to target any American ships that might show up near the city. Before they were even finished, two frigates, along with several galleys and gondolas, launched an attack. The Delaware, while engaged with the battery, got stranded because of the tide and was captured; soon after, the smaller frigate and the other vessels retreated under the protection of the fort's guns. This situation was particularly significant because it allowed the British General to control the ferry, giving him unrestricted access to New Jersey and enabling him to cut off communication between the forts downstream and Trenton, where the garrisons were supposed to receive their military supplies.

September 28.

All the expected reinforcements, except the state regiment and militia from Virginia, being arrived, and the detached parties being called in, the effective strength of the army amounted to eight thousand continental troops, and three thousand militia. With this force, General Washington determined to approach the enemy, and seize the first favourable moment to attack him. September 30.In pursuance of this determination, the army took a position on the Skippack road, about twenty miles from Philadelphia, and sixteen from Germantown,—a long village stretching on both sides the great road leading northward from Philadelphia, which forms one continued street nearly two miles in length. The British line of encampment crossed this village at right angles near the centre, and Lord Cornwallis, with four regiments of grenadiers, occupied Philadelphia. September 29.The immediate object of General Howe being the removal of the obstructions in the river, Colonel Stirling, with two regiments, had been detached to take possession of the fort at Billingsport, which he accomplished without opposition. This service being effected, and the works facing the water destroyed, Colonel Stirling was directed to escort a convoy of provisions from Chester to Philadelphia. October 3.Some apprehensions being entertained for the safety of this convoy, another regiment was detached from Germantown, with directions to join Colonel Stirling.[67]

All the expected reinforcements, except for the state regiment and militia from Virginia, had arrived, and the detached units were called in, bringing the effective strength of the army to eight thousand Continental troops and three thousand militia. With this force, General Washington planned to approach the enemy and seize the first favorable moment to attack. September 30th. In line with this plan, the army positioned itself on the Skippack Road, about twenty miles from Philadelphia and sixteen from Germantown—a long village stretching on both sides of the main road leading north from Philadelphia, which forms a continuous street nearly two miles long. The British encampment crossed this village at right angles near the center, with Lord Cornwallis occupying Philadelphia along with four regiments of grenadiers. September 29th. General Howe aimed to remove the obstacles in the river, so Colonel Stirling was sent with two regiments to take control of the fort at Billingsport, which he did without any resistance. Once this task was completed and the defenses facing the water were destroyed, Colonel Stirling was ordered to escort a convoy of provisions from Chester to Philadelphia. October 3rd. Concerned about the safety of this convoy, another regiment was sent from Germantown to join Colonel Stirling.[67]

This division of the British force appeared to Washington to furnish a fair opportunity to engage Sir William Howe with advantage. Determining to avail himself of it, he formed a plan for surprising the camp at Germantown, and attacking both wings, in front and rear, at the same instant.

This split in the British forces seemed to give Washington a good chance to take on Sir William Howe with an advantage. Deciding to take this opportunity, he devised a plan to surprise the camp at Germantown and attack both flanks, from the front and the back, at the same time.

The divisions of Sullivan and Wayne, flanked by Conway's brigade, were to march down the main road, and, entering the town by the way of Chesnut Hill, to attack the left wing; while General Armstrong, with the Pennsylvania militia, was to move down the Manatawny road[68] by Vanduring's mill, and turning the left flank to attack in the rear. The Commander-in-chief accompanied this column.

The divisions of Sullivan and Wayne, supported by Conway's brigade, were set to march down the main road and enter the town via Chesnut Hill to hit the left wing. Meanwhile, General Armstrong, with the Pennsylvania militia, was to head down the Manatawny road[68] by Vanduring's mill and turn the left flank to launch a rear attack. The Commander-in-chief was with this column.

The divisions of Greene and Stephen, flanked by M'Dougal's brigade, were to take a circuit by the Lime Kiln road, and, entering the town at the market house, to attack the right wing.

The divisions of Greene and Stephen, supported by M'Dougal's brigade, were to take a roundabout route via the Lime Kiln road and, entering the town at the market house, to strike the right flank.

The militia of Maryland and Jersey, under Generals Smallwood and Forman, were to march down the old York road, and turning the right to fall upon its rear.

The militias from Maryland and New Jersey, led by Generals Smallwood and Forman, were set to march down the old York road, then turn right to attack from behind.

The division of Lord Stirling, and the brigades of Nash and Maxwell, were to form a corps de reserve.

The division of Lord Stirling, along with the brigades of Nash and Maxwell, were set to create a reserve corps.

Parties of cavalry were silently to scour the roads to prevent observation, and to keep up the communication between the heads of the several columns.

Cavalry units were quietly patrolling the roads to avoid being seen and to maintain communication between the leaders of the different columns.

October 4.
Royal army attacked at Germantown.

The necessary arrangements being made, the army moved from its ground at seven in the afternoon. Before sunrise the next morning, the advance of the column led by Sullivan, encountered and drove in a picket placed at Mount Airy, the house of Mr. Allen.[69] The main body followed close in the rear, and engaging the light infantry and the 40th regiment, posted at the head of the village, soon forced them to give way, leaving their baggage behind them. Though closely pursued, Lieutenant Colonel Musgrave threw himself with five companies of the 40th regiment into a large stone house belonging to Mr. Chew, which stood directly in the way of Wayne's division, and poured on the Americans an incessant and galling fire of musketry from its doors and windows. After making some unsuccessful, and bloody attempts to carry this house by storm, and then battering it for a few minutes with field artillery, which was found too light to make any impression on its walls, a regiment was left to observe the party within it, while the troops who had been checked by Colonel Musgrave again moved forward, passing to the left of the house.

Once everything was set, the army left its position at seven in the evening. Before sunrise the next morning, the front of the column led by Sullivan encountered and drove back a picket stationed at Mount Airy, the residence of Mr. Allen.[69] The main force followed closely behind and, engaging with the light infantry and the 40th regiment stationed at the entrance of the village, quickly pushed them back, leaving their supplies behind. Although they were closely pursued, Lieutenant Colonel Musgrave took five companies of the 40th regiment into a large stone house owned by Mr. Chew, which was right in the path of Wayne's division, and launched a constant and intense musket fire at the Americans from its doors and windows. After several unsuccessful and bloody attempts to storm the house and then attempting to bombard it for a few minutes with field artillery—which proved too light to make any impact on its walls—a regiment was left to keep an eye on the group inside, while the troops that had been stalled by Colonel Musgrave advanced again, passing to the left of the house.

In rather more than half an hour after Sullivan had been engaged, the left wing, having formed the line, came also into action; and, attacking the light infantry posted in front of the British right wing, soon drove it from its ground. While rapidly pursuing the flying enemy, Woodford's brigade,[70] which was on the right of this wing, was arrested by a heavy fire from Chew's house, directed against its right flank. The inefficiency of musketry against troops thus sheltered being instantly perceived, the brigade was drawn off to the left by its commanding officer, and the field-pieces attached to it were ordered up to play on the house, but were too light to be of service. Some time was consumed in this operation, and the advance of the brigade was, of course, retarded. This part of the line was consequently broken, and the two brigades composing the division of Stephen were not only separated from each other, but from the other division which was led by General Greene in person. That division, consisting of the brigades of Muhlenberg and Scott, pressing forward with eagerness, encountered and broke a part of the British right wing, entered the village, and made a considerable number of prisoners.

In just over half an hour after Sullivan had taken his position, the left flank, having formed its line, also began fighting; and, by attacking the light infantry stationed in front of the British right flank, quickly drove them from their position. As they rapidly pursued the retreating enemy, Woodford's brigade,[70] which was on the right side of this flank, was stopped by heavy fire coming from Chew's house, aimed at its right side. Realizing that musket fire was ineffective against troops that were sheltered, the brigade's commander ordered a shift to the left, and the accompanying field artillery was called up to target the house, but it was too light to be effective. This operation took some time, which delayed the brigade's advance. As a result, this section of the line was compromised, and the two brigades in Stephen's division found themselves not only separated from each other but also from the other division led by General Greene himself. That division, made up of the brigades of Muhlenberg and Scott, pushed forward eagerly, encountered part of the British right flank, broke through, entered the village, and captured a significant number of prisoners.

Thus far the prospect was flattering. The attack had been made with great spirit; several brigades had entered the town; and such an impression had been made on the British army as to justify the expectation that its wings might be separated from each other, and a complete victory be obtained. Had the American troops possessed the advantages given by experience; had every division of the army performed with precision the part allotted to it, there is yet reason to believe that the hopes inspired by this favourable commencement would not have been disappointed. But the face of the country, and the darkness of the morning produced by a fog of uncommon density, co-operating with the want of discipline in the army, and the derangements of the corps from the incidents at Chew's house, blasted their flattering appearances, and defeated the enterprise.

So far, the outlook was promising. The attack had been carried out with great energy; several brigades had entered the town; and the impact on the British army was enough to support the hope that their forces might be split apart, leading to a total victory. If the American troops had the advantages of experience, and if every division of the army had carried out its assigned role with precision, there is still reason to believe that the hopes raised by this positive start would not have been dashed. But the lay of the land, combined with the unusual fog that blanketed the morning, along with the lack of discipline in the army and the confusion among the troops due to the events at Chew's house, ruined their promising outlook and thwarted the mission.

The grounds over which the British were pursued abounded with small and strong enclosures, which frequently broke the line of the advancing army. The two divisions of the right wing had been separated at Chew's house; and immediately after their passing it, the right of the left wing was stopped at the same place, so as to cause a division of that wing also. The darkness of the morning rendered it difficult to distinguish objects even at an inconsiderable distance; and it was impossible for the Commander-in-chief to learn the situation of the whole, or to correct the confusion which was commencing. The divisions and brigades separated at Chew's house could not be reunited; and, even among those parts which remained entire, a considerable degree of disorder was soon introduced by the impediments to their advance. Some regiments pursuing with more vivacity than others, they were separated from each other, their weight lessened, and their effect impaired. The darkness which obstructed the reunion of the broken parts of the American army, also prevented their discerning the real situation of the enemy, so as to improve the first impression; and, in some instances, some corps being in advance of others, produced uncertainty whether the troops, seen indistinctly, were friends or foes.

The areas where the British were chased were full of small, strong enclosures that often interrupted the advancing army’s line. The two divisions of the right wing got separated at Chew's house, and right after they passed it, the right side of the left wing also got halted there, causing further division of that wing. The morning's darkness made it hard to see even nearby objects, making it impossible for the Commander-in-chief to understand the overall situation or to fix the confusion that was starting to unfold. The divisions and brigades that had split at Chew's house couldn't come back together, and even among the parts that remained intact, there was soon a significant amount of disorder caused by obstacles to their advance. Some regiments pursued more vigorously than others, which led to them getting separated from each other, reducing their strength and effectiveness. The darkness that blocked the reunion of the scattered parts of the American army also made it difficult for them to see the enemy's actual position, preventing them from taking advantage of the initial situation. In some cases, certain units moved ahead of others, creating uncertainty about whether the vaguely seen troops were allies or enemies.

The attacks on the flanks and rear, which formed a part of the original plan, do not appear ever to have been made. The Pennsylvania militia came in view of the chasseurs who flanked the left of the British line, but did not engage them closely. The Maryland and Jersey militia just showed themselves on the right flank, about the time Greene was commencing a retreat.

The attacks on the sides and back, which were part of the original plan, don't seem to have ever happened. The Pennsylvania militia spotted the chasseurs who were on the left side of the British line, but they didn’t engage them closely. The Maryland and Jersey militia only appeared on the right side around the time Greene was starting to retreat.

The Americans repulsed.

These embarrassments gave the British time to recover from the consternation into which they had been thrown. General Knyphausen, who commanded their left, detached two brigades to meet the right of Sullivan which had penetrated far into the village, before his left, which had been detained at Chew's house, could rejoin him; and the action became warm in this quarter. The British right also recovered from its surprise, and advanced on that part of Greene's division which had entered the town. After a sharp engagement these two brigades began to retreat, and those which were most in advance were surrounded and compelled to surrender. About the same time the right wing also began to retreat. It is understood that they had expended their ammunition.

These setbacks gave the British time to recover from the shock they had experienced. General Knyphausen, who was in charge of their left, sent two brigades to confront Sullivan's right that had pushed deep into the village, before his left, which had been held up at Chew's house, could reunite with him; and the fighting intensified in this area. The British right also regained its footing and moved against the part of Greene's division that had entered the town. After a fierce battle, these two brigades started to fall back, and those that were furthest ahead were surrounded and forced to surrender. Around the same time, the right wing also began to withdraw. It's understood that they had run out of ammunition.

Every effort to stop this retrograde movement proved ineffectual. The division of Wayne fell back on that of Stephen, and was for an instant mistaken for the enemy. General confusion prevailed, and the confidence felt in the beginning of the action was lost. With infinite chagrin General Washington was compelled to relinquish his hopes of victory, and turn his attention to the security of his army. The enemy not being sufficiently recovered to endanger his rear, the retreat was made without loss, under cover of the division of Stephen, which had scarcely been in the engagement.

Every attempt to stop this backward movement ended up being useless. Wayne's division fell back onto Stephen’s, and for a moment, they were mistaken for the enemy. General confusion took over, and the confidence that had been felt at the start of the battle was lost. With great disappointment, General Washington had to give up his hopes of victory and focus on keeping his army safe. Since the enemy was not in a strong enough position to threaten his rear, the retreat was carried out without any losses, protected by Stephen’s division, which had barely participated in the fight.

In this battle, about two hundred Americans were killed, near three times that number wounded, and about four hundred were made prisoners. Among the killed was General Nash of North Carolina; and among the prisoners was Colonel Matthews of Virginia, whose regiment had penetrated into the centre of the town.

In this battle, around two hundred Americans were killed, nearly three times that number were wounded, and about four hundred were taken prisoner. Among the dead was General Nash of North Carolina, and among the prisoners was Colonel Matthews of Virginia, whose regiment had moved into the center of the town.

The loss of the British, as stated in the official return of General Howe, did not much exceed five hundred in killed and wounded, of whom less than one hundred were killed; among the latter were Brigadier General Agnew and Colonel Bird.

The loss of the British, as stated in the official report from General Howe, was just over five hundred in total for killed and wounded, with fewer than one hundred killed; among those killed were Brigadier General Agnew and Colonel Bird.

The American army retreated the same day, about twenty miles, to Perkyomy Creek, where a small reinforcement, consisting of fifteen hundred militia and a state regiment, was received from Virginia; after which it again advanced towards Philadelphia, and encamped once more on Skippack Creek.

The American army pulled back the same day, about twenty miles, to Perkyomy Creek, where they received a small reinforcement of fifteen hundred militia and a state regiment from Virginia; after that, they moved forward again toward Philadelphia and set up camp once more on Skippack Creek.

The plan of the battle of Germantown must be admitted to have been judiciously formed; and, in its commencement, to have been happily conducted. But a strict adherence to it by those who were entrusted with the execution of its several parts, was indispensable to its success.

The strategy for the battle of Germantown was clearly well thought out and, at the start, went smoothly. However, it was crucial for those responsible for carrying out its various components to stick to the plan for it to succeed.

Major General Stephen, who commanded the right division of the left wing, was cashiered for misconduct on the retreat, and for intoxication.

Major General Stephen, who led the right division of the left wing, was dismissed for inappropriate behavior during the retreat and for being drunk.

Congress expressed, in decided terms, their approbation both of the plan of this enterprise, and of the courage with which it was executed; for which their thanks were given to the general and the army.[71]

Congress clearly expressed their approval of both the plan for this venture and the bravery with which it was carried out, for which they extended their thanks to the general and the army.[71]

The attention of both armies was most principally directed to the forts below Philadelphia.

The focus of both armies was primarily on the forts near Philadelphia.

The loss of the Delaware frigate, and of Billingsport, greatly discouraged the seamen by whom the galleys and floating batteries were manned. Believing the fate of America to be decided, an opinion strengthened by the intelligence received from their connexions in Philadelphia, they manifested the most alarming defection, and several officers as well as sailors deserted to the enemy. This desponding temper was checked by the battle of Germantown, and by throwing a garrison of continental troops into the fort at Red Bank, called fort Mercer, the defence of which had been entrusted to militia. This fort commanded the channel between the Jersey shore and Mud Island; and the American vessels were secure under its guns. The militia of Jersey were relied on to reinforce its garrison, and also to form a corps of observation which might harass the rear of any detachment investing the place.

The loss of the Delaware frigate and Billingsport really discouraged the sailors manning the galleys and floating batteries. They thought America’s fate was sealed, a belief reinforced by the news they received from contacts in Philadelphia. This led to a serious loss of morale, and several officers and sailors switched sides to join the enemy. However, this gloomy attitude was lifted by the Battle of Germantown and by sending a garrison of Continental troops to Fort Mercer at Red Bank, which had previously been defended by militia. This fort controlled the waterway between the New Jersey shore and Mud Island, keeping American vessels safe under its protection. The militia from New Jersey was expected to boost its defenses and to create a unit to monitor and disrupt any enemy detachments surrounding the area.

Measures taken by General Washington for cutting off supplies from Philadelphia.

To increase the inconvenience of General Howe's situation by intercepting his supplies, six hundred militia, commanded by General Potter, crossed the Schuylkill, with orders to scour the country between that river and Chester; and the militia on the Delaware, above Philadelphia, were directed to watch the roads in that vicinity.

To make General Howe's situation even worse by cutting off his supplies, six hundred militia led by General Potter crossed the Schuylkill River with orders to patrol the area between that river and Chester. The militia on the Delaware, north of Philadelphia, were instructed to keep an eye on the roads in that area.

The more effectually to stop those who were seduced by the hope of gold and silver to supply the enemy at this critical time, congress passed a resolution subjecting to martial law and to death, all who should furnish them with provisions, or certain other enumerated articles, who should be taken within thirty miles of any city, town or place, in Jersey, Pennsylvania, or Delaware, occupied by British troops.

To more effectively stop those who were tempted by the promise of gold and silver to supply the enemy during this critical time, Congress passed a resolution imposing martial law and the death penalty on anyone who provided provisions or certain other specified items to British troops, if they were caught within thirty miles of any city, town, or location in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or Delaware occupied by British forces.

These arrangements being made to cut off supplies from the country, General Washington reoccupied the ground from which he had marched to fight the battle of Germantown.

These plans were put in place to block supplies from the country, General Washington returned to the area he had left to fight in the battle of Germantown.

Attack upon Fort Mifflin.

Meanwhile, General Howe was actively preparing to attack fort Mifflin from the Pennsylvania shore. He erected some batteries at the mouth of the Schuylkill, in order to command Webb's ferry, which were attacked by Commodore Hazlewood, and silenced; but, the following night, a detachment crossed over Webb's ferry into Province Island, and constructed a slight work opposite fort Mifflin, within two musket shots of the block-house, from which they were enabled to throw shot and shells into the barracks. When day-light discovered this work, three galleys and a floating battery were ordered to attack it, and the garrison surrendered. While the boats were bringing off the prisoners, a large column of British troops were seen marching into the fortress, upon which the attack on it was renewed, but without success; and two attempts made by Lieutenant Colonel Smith to storm it, failed. In a few nights, works were completed on the high ground of Province Island which enfiladed the principal battery of fort Mifflin, and rendered it necessary to throw up some cover on the platform to protect the men who worked the guns.

Meanwhile, General Howe was actively preparing to attack Fort Mifflin from the Pennsylvania shore. He set up some batteries at the mouth of the Schuylkill to control Webb's ferry, which were attacked and silenced by Commodore Hazlewood. However, the next night, a group crossed over Webb's ferry to Province Island and built a small fort opposite Fort Mifflin, within two musket shots of the blockhouse, allowing them to fire shots and shells into the barracks. When daylight revealed this fortification, three galleys and a floating battery were ordered to attack it, and the garrison surrendered. While the boats were bringing in the prisoners, a large column of British troops was seen marching into the fortress, prompting a renewed attack, but it was unsuccessful. Two attempts by Lieutenant Colonel Smith to storm it failed. In a few nights, they completed works on the high ground of Province Island that overlooked the main battery of Fort Mifflin, making it necessary to build some cover on the platform to protect the men operating the guns.

The aids expected from the Jersey militia were not received. "Assure yourself," said Lieutenant Colonel Smith, in a letter pressing earnestly for a reinforcement of continental troops, "that no dependence is to be put on the militia; whatever men your excellency determines on sending, no time is to be lost." The garrison of fort Mifflin was now reduced to one hundred and fifty-six effectives, and that of Red Bank did not much exceed two hundred.

The support expected from the Jersey militia never arrived. "You can be sure," Lieutenant Colonel Smith wrote in a letter urgently requesting more continental troops, "that we can't rely on the militia; whatever troops you decide to send, we can't waste any time." The garrison at Fort Mifflin was now down to one hundred and fifty-six effective soldiers, and the garrison at Red Bank was just over two hundred.

In consequence of these representations, Colonel Angel, of Rhode Island, with his regiment, was ordered to Red Bank, and Lieutenant Colonel John Greene, of Virginia, with about two hundred men, to fort Mifflin.

As a result of these reports, Colonel Angel from Rhode Island and his regiment were sent to Red Bank, while Lieutenant Colonel John Greene from Virginia, along with about two hundred men, was assigned to Fort Mifflin.

Immediately after the battle of Brandywine, Admiral Howe sailed for the Delaware, where he expected to arrive in time to meet and co-operate with the army in and about Philadelphia. But the winds were so unfavourable, and the navigation of the bay of Delaware so difficult, that his van did not get into the river until the 4th of October. The ships of war and transports which followed, came up from the sixth to the eighth, and anchored from New Castle to Reedy Island.

Immediately after the Battle of Brandywine, Admiral Howe sailed for the Delaware, where he expected to arrive in time to meet and cooperate with the army in and around Philadelphia. However, the winds were so unfavorable, and navigating the Delaware Bay was so challenging, that his advance didn't reach the river until October 4th. The warships and transport vessels that followed came in between the 6th and 8th and anchored from New Castle to Reedy Island.

The frigates, in advance of the fleet, had not yet succeeded in their endeavours to effect a passage through the lower double row of chevaux-de-frise. Though no longer protected by the fort at Billingsport, they were defended by the water force above, and the work was found more difficult than had been expected. It was not until the middle of October that the impediments were so far removed as to afford a narrow and intricate passage through them. In the mean time, the fire from the Pennsylvania shore had not produced all the effect expected from it; and it was perceived that greater exertions would be necessary for the reduction of the works than could safely be made in the present relative situation of the armies. Under this impression, General Howe, soon after the return of the American army to its former camp on the Skippack, withdrew his troops from Germantown into Philadelphia, as preparatory to a combined attack by land and water on forts Mercer and Mifflin.

The frigates, ahead of the fleet, hadn't yet managed to get through the lower double row of obstacles. Even though they were no longer covered by the fort at Billingsport, they were still defended by the naval force upstream, and the task turned out to be harder than anticipated. It wasn't until mid-October that the barriers were cleared enough to allow for a narrow and complicated passage. In the meantime, the fire from the Pennsylvania shore hadn't had the desired impact, and it became clear that more effort would be needed to take down the defenses than could safely be made given the current situation of the armies. With this in mind, General Howe, shortly after the American army returned to its original camp at Skippack, pulled his troops back from Germantown into Philadelphia, preparing for a joint attack by land and water on forts Mercer and Mifflin.

After effecting a passage through the works sunk in the river at Billingsport, other difficulties still remained to be encountered by the ships of war. Several rows of chevaux-de-frise had been sunk about half a mile below Mud Island, which were protected by the guns of the forts, as well as by the moveable water force. To silence these works, therefore, was a necessary preliminary to the removal of these obstructions in the channel.

After making their way through the structures submerged in the river at Billingsport, the warships still faced more challenges. Several rows of chevaux-de-frise were sunk about half a mile below Mud Island, protected by the guns of the forts and the mobile naval forces. So, silencing these defenses was essential before removing the obstacles in the channel.

October.
Attack upon Red Bank.

On the 21st of October, a detachment of Hessians, amounting to twelve hundred men, commanded by Colonel Count Donop, crossed the Delaware at Philadelphia, with orders to storm the fort at Red Bank. The fortifications consisted of extensive outer works, within which was an intrenchment eight or nine feet high, boarded and fraized. Late in the evening of the twenty-second. Count Donop appeared before the fort, and attacked it with great intrepidity. It was defended with equal resolution. The outer works being too extensive to be manned by the troops in the fort, were used only to gall the assailants while advancing. On their near approach, the garrison retired within the inner intrenchment, whence they poured upon the Hessians a heavy and destructive fire. Colonel Donop killed and his party repulsed with considerable loss.Colonel Donop received a mortal wound; and Lieutenant Colonel Mengerode, the second in command, fell about the same time. Lieutenant Colonel Minsing, the oldest remaining officer, drew off his troops, and returned next day to Philadelphia. The loss of the assailants was estimated by the Americans at four hundred men. The garrison was reinforced from fort Mifflin, and aided by the galleys which flanked the Hessians in their advance and retreat. The American loss, in killed and wounded, amounted to only thirty-two men.

On October 21st, a group of Hessian soldiers, totaling twelve hundred men and led by Colonel Count Donop, crossed the Delaware River at Philadelphia with orders to attack the fort at Red Bank. The fortifications included extensive outer works, with an inner trench that was eight or nine feet high, lined with boards and sharpened sticks. Late in the evening of the 22nd, Count Donop arrived at the fort and launched a bold attack. The fort was defended just as fiercely. The outer works were too large to be fully manned by the troops inside, so they were mostly used to harass the attackers as they approached. When the Hessians got close, the garrison fell back into the inner trench, from where they unleashed a heavy and devastating fire on the Hessians. Colonel Donop was killed, and his troops were forced to retreat with heavy losses. Colonel Donop received a fatal wound; Lieutenant Colonel Mengerode, who was second in command, fell around the same time. Lieutenant Colonel Minsing, the highest-ranking officer still alive, withdrew his troops and returned to Philadelphia the next day. The Americans estimated the attackers' losses to be around four hundred men. The garrison received reinforcements from Fort Mifflin and was supported by the galleys that flanked the Hessians during their advance and retreat. The American loss, in terms of killed and wounded, was just thirty-two men.

The Augusta frigate blows up.

The ships having been ordered to co-operate with Count Donop, the Augusta, with four smaller vessels, passed the lower line of chevaux-de-frise, opposite to Billingsport, and lay above it, waiting until the assault should be made on the fort. The flood tide setting in about the time the attack commenced, they moved with it up the river. The obstructions sunk in the Delaware had in some degree changed its channel, in consequence of which the Augusta and the Merlin grounded, a considerable distance below the second line of chevaux-de-frise and a strong wind from the north so checked the rising of the tide, that these vessels could not be floated by the flood. Their situation, however, was not discerned that evening, as the frigates which were able to approach the fort, and the batteries from the Pennsylvania shore, kept up an incessant fire on the garrison, till night put an end to the cannonade. Early next morning it was recommenced, in the hope that, under its cover, the Augusta and the Merlin might be got off. The Americans, on discovering their situation, sent four fire ships against them, but without effect. Meanwhile, a warm cannonade took place on both sides, in the course of which the Augusta took fire, and it was found impracticable to extinguish the flames. Most of the men were taken out, the frigates withdrawn, and the Merlin set on fire; after which the Augusta blew up, and a few of the crew were lost in her.

The ships were ordered to work with Count Donop. The Augusta, along with four smaller vessels, passed the lower line of chevaux-de-frise, opposite Billingsport, and stayed above it, waiting for the assault on the fort to begin. As the flood tide came in around the time of the attack, they moved up the river with it. The obstructions sunk in the Delaware had somewhat changed its channel, which caused the Augusta and the Merlin to run aground, quite a distance below the second line of chevaux-de-frise. A strong north wind held back the rising tide, so those vessels couldn't be floated by the flood. However, they were not noticed that evening, as the frigates able to approach the fort and the batteries from the Pennsylvania shore kept firing at the garrison until nightfall ended the cannonade. Early the next morning, the firing resumed, hoping that under its cover, they could get the Augusta and the Merlin off. The Americans, upon realizing their situation, sent four fire ships against them, but it was ineffective. Meanwhile, a fierce cannonade took place on both sides, during which the Augusta caught fire, and it was found impossible to put out the flames. Most of the crew were evacuated, the frigates pulled back, and the Merlin was set on fire; afterwards, the Augusta exploded, resulting in a few crew members being lost.

This repulse inspired congress with flattering hopes for the permanent defence of the posts on the Delaware. That body expressed its high sense of the merits of Colonel Greene of Rhode Island, who had commanded in fort Mercer; of Lieutenant Colonel Smith of Maryland, who had commanded in fort Mifflin; and of Commodore Hazlewood, who commanded the galleys; and presented a sword to each of these officers, as a mark of estimation in which their services were held.

This defeat sparked Congress's optimistic hopes for the long-term defense of the positions on the Delaware. They recognized the impressive efforts of Colonel Greene from Rhode Island, who led at Fort Mercer; Lieutenant Colonel Smith from Maryland, who was in charge at Fort Mifflin; and Commodore Hazlewood, who commanded the galleys. Congress awarded a sword to each of these officers as a sign of appreciation for their service.

The situation of these forts was far from justifying this confidence of their being defensible. That on Mud Island had been unskilfully constructed, and required at least eight hundred men fully to man the lines. The island is about half a mile long. Fort Mifflin was placed at the lower end, having its principal fortifications in front for the purpose of repelling ships coming up the river. The defences in the rear consisted only of a ditch and palisade, protected by two block-houses, the upper story of one of which had been destroyed in the late cannonade. Above the fort were two batteries opposing those constructed by the British on Province and Carpenter's Islands, which were separated from Mud Island only by a narrow passage between four and five hundred yards wide.

The state of these forts did not support the belief that they were defensible. The one on Mud Island was poorly built and needed at least eight hundred men to fully operate the lines. The island is about half a mile long. Fort Mifflin was located at the lower end, with its main defenses focused on the front to stop ships coming up the river. The defenses in the back only included a ditch and palisade, protected by two blockhouses, one of which lost its upper story in the recent cannon fire. Above the fort were two batteries countering those set up by the British on Province and Carpenter's Islands, which were only a narrow passage of four to five hundred yards from Mud Island.

The vessels of war, engaged in the defence of the Delaware, were partly in the service of the continent, and partly in that of the state of Pennsylvania, under a Commodore who received his commission from the state. A misunderstanding took place between him and Lieutenant Colonel Smith, and also between him and the officers of the continental navy; and it required all the authority of the Commander-in-chief to prevent these differences from essentially injuring the service.

The warships defending the Delaware were partly working for the continent and partly for the state of Pennsylvania, under a Commodore who was commissioned by the state. There was a misunderstanding between him and Lieutenant Colonel Smith, as well as between him and the officers of the continental navy; it took the full authority of the Commander-in-chief to prevent these conflicts from seriously harming the mission.

The garrison of fort Mifflin consisted of only three hundred continental troops, who were worn down with fatigue, and constant watching, under the constant apprehension of being attacked from Province Island, from Philadelphia, and from the ships below.

The garrison at Fort Mifflin had just three hundred Continental troops, who were exhausted from fatigue and constant vigilance, always worried about being attacked from Province Island, Philadelphia, and the ships below.

October 29.

Having failed in every attempt to draw the militia of Jersey to the Delaware, General Washington determined to strengthen the garrison by farther drafts from his army. Three hundred Pennsylvania militia were detached, to be divided between the two forts; and, a few days afterwards, General Varnum was ordered, with his brigade, to take a position about Woodbury, near Red Bank, and to relieve and reinforce the garrisons of both forts as far as his strength would permit. The hope was entertained that the appearance of so respectable a continental force might encourage the militia to assemble in greater numbers.

Having failed in every attempt to bring the Jersey militia to Delaware, General Washington decided to boost the garrison by pulling more troops from his army. Three hundred Pennsylvania militia were sent, to be split between the two forts. A few days later, General Varnum was ordered, along with his brigade, to set up a position near Woodbury, close to Red Bank, and to support and reinforce the garrisons of both forts as much as he could. There was hope that the presence of such a significant continental force would encourage the militia to gather in larger numbers.

Aware of the advantage to result from a victory over the British army while separated from the fleet, General Washington had been uniformly determined to risk much to gain one. He had, therefore, after the battle of Germantown, continued to watch assiduously for an opportunity to attack his enemy once more to advantage. The circumspect caution of General Howe afforded none. After the repulse at Red Bank, his measures were slow but certain; and were calculated to insure the possession of the forts without exposing his troops to the hazard of an assault.

Aware of the benefits of defeating the British army while they were away from their fleet, General Washington was consistently determined to take big risks for a potential victory. After the battle of Germantown, he kept a close eye out for a chance to strike at his enemy advantageously again. However, General Howe's careful approach didn’t offer any opportunities. After the setback at Red Bank, his plans were slow but steady, designed to secure the forts without putting his troops in danger of an attack.

In this state of things, intelligence was received of the successful termination of the northern campaign, in consequence of which great part of the troops who had been employed against Burgoyne, might be drawn to the aid of the army in Pennsylvania. But it was feared that, before these reinforcements could arrive, Sir William Howe would gain possession of the forts, and remove the obstructions to the navigation of the Delaware. This apprehension furnished a strong motive for vigorous attempts to relieve fort Mifflin. But the relative force of the armies, the difficulty of acting offensively against Philadelphia, and, above all, the reflection that a defeat might disable him from meeting his enemy in the field even after the arrival of the troops expected from the north, determined General Washington not to hazard a second attack under existing circumstances.

In this situation, news came in about the successful end of the northern campaign, which meant that a large part of the troops fighting against Burgoyne could be sent to support the army in Pennsylvania. However, there was concern that, before these reinforcements arrived, Sir William Howe would take control of the forts and clear the obstacles in the Delaware River. This worry provided a strong reason for making serious efforts to relieve Fort Mifflin. But given the relative strength of the armies, the challenges of launching an offensive against Philadelphia, and, most importantly, the realization that a defeat might prevent him from confronting his enemy in the field even after the northern troops arrived, General Washington decided not to risk a second attack under these conditions.

To expedite the reinforcements for which he waited, Colonel Hamilton was despatched to General Gates with directions to represent to him the condition of the armies in Pennsylvania; and to urge him, if he contemplated no other service of more importance, immediately to send the regiments of Massachusetts and New Hampshire to aid the army of the middle department. These orders were not peremptory, because it was possible that some other object (as the capture of New York) still more interesting than the expulsion of General Howe from Philadelphia, might be contemplated by Gates; and Washington meant not to interfere with the accomplishment of such object.

To speed up the reinforcements he was waiting for, Colonel Hamilton was sent to General Gates with instructions to explain the situation of the armies in Pennsylvania and to urge him, if he had no other more important missions planned, to immediately send the regiments from Massachusetts and New Hampshire to support the army in the middle department. These orders weren’t mandatory, because it was possible that Gates had another goal in mind (like capturing New York) that was even more critical than getting General Howe out of Philadelphia, and Washington didn’t want to disrupt that effort.

On reaching General Putnam, Colonel Hamilton found that a considerable part of the northern army had joined that officer, but that Gates had detained four brigades at Albany for an expedition intended to be made in the winter against Ticonderoga.

On reaching General Putnam, Colonel Hamilton discovered that a significant portion of the northern army had joined that officer, but that Gates had held back four brigades in Albany for a planned winter expedition against Ticonderoga.

Having made such arrangements with Putnam as he supposed would secure the immediate march of a large body of continental troops from that station, Colonel Hamilton proceeded to Albany for the purpose of remonstrating to General Gates against retaining so large and valuable a part of the army unemployed at a time when the most imminent danger threatened the vitals of the country. Gates was by no means disposed to part with his troops. He could not believe that an expedition then preparing at New York, was designed to reinforce General Howe; and insisted that, should the troops then embarked at that place, instead of proceeding to the Delaware, make a sudden movement up the Hudson, it would be in their power, should Albany be left defenceless, to destroy the valuable arsenal which had been there erected, and the military stores captured with Burgoyne, which had been chiefly deposited in that town.

Having made arrangements with Putnam that he thought would ensure the quick movement of a large group of Continental troops from that location, Colonel Hamilton went to Albany to persuade General Gates not to keep such a large and valuable part of the army inactive at a time when the country was facing serious danger. Gates was not at all inclined to let go of his troops. He couldn’t believe that an expedition being prepared in New York was meant to reinforce General Howe; he insisted that if the troops already loaded at that location decided to move unexpectedly up the Hudson instead of heading to the Delaware, they could potentially destroy the valuable arsenal built in Albany and the military supplies that had been mainly stored there after capturing Burgoyne.

Having, after repeated remonstrances, obtained an order directing three brigades to the Delaware, Hamilton hastened back to Putnam, and found the troops which had been ordered to join General Washington, still at Peekskill. The detachment from New York had suggested to Putnam the possibility of taking that place; and he does not appear to have made very great exertions to divest himself of a force he deemed necessary for an object, the accomplishment of which would give so much splendour to his military character. In addition to this circumstance, an opinion had gained ground among the soldiers that their share of service for the campaign had been performed, and that it was time for them to go into winter quarters. Great discontents too prevailed concerning their pay, which the government had permitted to be more than six months in arrear; and in Poor's brigade, a mutiny broke out, in the course of which a soldier who was run through the body by his captain, before he expired, shot the captain dead who gave the wound. Colonel Hamilton came in time to borrow money from the governor of New York, to put the troops in motion; and they proceeded by brigades to the Delaware. But these several delays retarded their arrival until the contest for the forts on that river was terminated.

After multiple complaints, Hamilton managed to get an order sending three brigades to the Delaware. He rushed back to Putnam and found that the troops meant to join General Washington were still at Peekskill. The detachment from New York had suggested to Putnam that capturing that place was possible, and he didn’t seem to make much effort to let go of the troops he thought were needed for a goal that would greatly boost his military reputation. Additionally, many soldiers believed they had already fulfilled their service for the campaign and that it was time for them to settle into winter quarters. There was also widespread dissatisfaction regarding their pay, which the government had allowed to be over six months overdue; in Poor's brigade, a mutiny erupted, during which a soldier who was fatally stabbed by his captain managed to shoot the captain dead before he died. Colonel Hamilton arrived just in time to borrow money from the governor of New York to get the troops moving, and they proceeded in brigades to the Delaware. However, these delays slowed their arrival until the battle for the forts on that river was over.

November.

The preparations of Sir William Howe being completed, a large battery on Province Island of twenty-four and thirty-two pounders, and two howitzers of eight inches each, opened, early in the morning of the 10th of November, upon fort Mifflin, at the distance of five hundred yards, and kept up an incessant fire for several successive days. The block-houses were reduced to a heap of ruins; the palisades were beaten down; and most of the guns dismounted and otherwise disabled. The barracks were battered in every part, so that the troops could not remain in them. They were under the necessity of working and watching the whole night to repair the damages of the day, and to guard against a storm, of which they were in perpetual apprehension. If in the day, a few moments were allowed for repose, it was taken on the wet earth, which, in consequence of heavy rains, had become a soft mud. The garrison was relieved by General Varnum every forty-eight hours; but his brigade was so weak that half the men were constantly on duty.

The preparations of Sir William Howe were finished, and a large battery on Province Island, equipped with twenty-four and thirty-two pounders and two eight-inch howitzers, began firing early in the morning on November 10th at Fort Mifflin, about five hundred yards away. They maintained a relentless barrage for several days. The blockhouses were reduced to rubble; the palisades were knocked down; most of the guns were dismounted or damaged. The barracks were battered all over, making it impossible for the troops to stay inside. They had to work and watch all night to fix the damage from the day and to prepare for a storm that they constantly feared. If there were a few moments during the day when they could rest, it was on the wet ground, which had turned to soft mud due to heavy rains. General Varnum relieved the garrison every forty-eight hours; however, his brigade was so small that half the men were always on duty.

Colonel Smith was decidedly of opinion, and General Varnum concurred with him, that the garrison could not repel an assault, and ought to be withdrawn; but General Washington still cherished the hope that the place might be maintained until he should be reinforced from the northern army. Believing that an assault would not be attempted until the works were battered down, he recommended that the whole night should be employed in making repairs. His orders were that the place should be defended to the last extremity; and never were orders more faithfully executed.

Colonel Smith strongly believed, and General Varnum agreed with him, that the garrison couldn’t withstand an attack and should be pulled back; however, General Washington still hoped that the location could be held until he received reinforcements from the northern army. Convinced that an attack wouldn’t happen until the defenses were weakened, he suggested that they spend the entire night on repairs. His orders were to defend the area at all costs; and those orders were carried out with utmost dedication.

November 11.

Several of the garrison were killed, and among them Captain Treat, a gallant officer, who commanded the artillery. Colonel Smith received a contusion on his hip and arm which compelled him to give up the command, and retire to Red Bank. Major Fleury, a French officer of distinguished merit, who served as engineer, reported to the Commander-in-chief that, although the block-houses were beaten down, all the guns in them, except two, disabled, and several breaches made in the walls, the place was still defensible; but the garrison was so unequal to the numbers required by the extent of the lines, and was so dispirited by watching, fatigue, and constant exposure to the cold rains which were almost incessant, that he dreaded the event of an attempt to carry the place by storm. Fourteenth.Fresh troops were ordered to their relief from Varnum's brigade, and the command was taken, first by Colonel Russell, and afterwards by Major Thayer. The artillery, commanded by Captain Lee, continued to be well served. The besiegers were several times thrown into confusion, and a floating battery which opened on the morning of the 14th, was silenced in the course of the day.

Several members of the garrison were killed, including Captain Treat, a brave officer who was in charge of the artillery. Colonel Smith sustained injuries to his hip and arm that forced him to relinquish command and retreat to Red Bank. Major Fleury, a distinguished French officer serving as an engineer, informed the Commander-in-chief that, although the block-houses were destroyed, only two of the guns in them were disabled, and several breaches had been made in the walls, the location was still defensible. However, the garrison was far outnumbered for the length of the lines and was demoralized by constant watching, fatigue, and exposure to the almost relentless cold rains, leading him to fear the outcome of an attempt to storm the place. 14th. Fresh troops were sent to their aid from Varnum's brigade, with command initially taken by Colonel Russell and later by Major Thayer. The artillery, led by Captain Lee, continued to be effectively used. The besiegers were thrown into chaos several times, and a floating battery that opened on the morning of the 14th was silenced by the end of the day.

Fifteenth.

The defence being unexpectedly obstinate, the assailants brought up their ships as far as the obstructions in the river permitted, and added their fire to that of the batteries, which was the more fatal as the cover for the troops had been greatly impaired. The brave garrison, however, still maintained their ground with unshaken firmness. In the midst of this stubborn conflict, the Vigilant and a sloop of war were brought up the inner channel, between Mud and Province Islands, which had, unobserved by the besieged, been deepened by the current in consequence of the obstructions in the main channel; and, taking a station within one hundred yards of the works, not only kept up a destructive cannonade, but threw hand grenades into them; while the musketeers from the round top of the Vigilant killed every man that appeared on the platform.

The defense was surprisingly tough, so the attackers moved their ships as far up the river as the obstacles allowed and added their fire to that of the batteries, which was more devastating since the cover for the troops had been significantly weakened. However, the brave garrison held their ground with unwavering determination. In the midst of this intense battle, the Vigilant and a war sloop entered the inner channel between Mud and Province Islands, which had been deepened by the current due to the obstructions in the main channel and went unnoticed by the besieged. They positioned themselves within a hundred yards of the fortifications, not only unleashing a devastating cannon fire but also throwing hand grenades at them, while the musketeers from the top of the Vigilant shot down every man who appeared on the platform.

Major Thayer applied to the Commodore to remove these vessels, and he ordered six galleys on the service; but, after reconnoitring their situation, the galleys returned without attempting any thing. Their report was that these ships were so covered by the batteries on Province Island as to be unassailable.

Major Thayer asked the Commodore to take action against these vessels, and he ordered six galleys to assist; however, after assessing the situation, the galleys returned without making any attempts. Their report indicated that these ships were so protected by the batteries on Province Island that they were impossible to attack.

Fort Mifflin evacuated and possession taken by the British.
November 16.

It was now apparent to all that the fort could be no longer defended. The works were in ruins. The position of the Vigilant rendered any farther continuance on the island a prodigal and useless waste of human life; and on the 16th, about 11 at night, the garrison was withdrawn.[72]

It was now clear to everyone that the fort could no longer be defended. The structures were in ruins. The position of the Vigilant made any further stay on the island a reckless and pointless waste of human life; and on the 16th, around 11 at night, the garrison was evacuated.[72]

A second attempt was made to drive the vessels from their stations with a determination, should it succeed, to repossess the island; but the galleys effected nothing; and a detachment from Province Island soon occupied the ground which had been abandoned.

A second attempt was made to drive the ships from their positions with a firm resolve, aiming to take back the island if successful; however, the galleys achieved nothing, and a group from Province Island quickly took over the area that had been left vacant.

November 17.

The day after receiving intelligence of the evacuation of fort Mifflin, General Washington deputed Generals De Kalb, and Knox, to confer with General Varnum and the officers at fort Mercer on the practicability of continuing to defend the obstructions in the channel, to report thereon, and to state the force which would be necessary for that purpose. Their report was in favour of continuing the defence. A council of the navy officers had already been called by the Commodore in pursuance of a request of the Commander-in-chief made before the evacuation had taken place, who were unanimously of opinion that it would be impracticable for the fleet, after the loss of the island, to maintain its station, or to assist in preventing the chevaux-de-frise from being weighed by the ships of the enemy.

The day after getting word about the evacuation of Fort Mifflin, General Washington assigned Generals De Kalb and Knox to meet with General Varnum and the officers at Fort Mercer to discuss whether it was feasible to keep defending the barriers in the channel. They were to report back and indicate how many troops would be needed for that effort. Their report recommended continuing the defense. A council of naval officers had already been called by the Commodore following a request from the Commander-in-chief made before the evacuation, and they all agreed that it would be impossible for the fleet to maintain its position or help prevent the enemy's ships from removing the chevaux-de-frise after losing the island.

General Howe had now completed a line of defence from the Schuylkill to the Delaware; and a reinforcement from New York had arrived at Chester. These two circumstances enabled him to form an army in the Jerseys sufficient for the reduction of fort Mercer, without weakening himself so much in Philadelphia as to put his lines in hazard. Still deeming it of the utmost importance to open the navigation of the Delaware completely, he detached Lord Cornwallis about one in the morning of the 17th, with a strong body of troops to Chester. From that place, his lordship crossed over to Billingsport, where he was joined by the reinforcement from New York.

General Howe had now set up a line of defense from the Schuylkill to the Delaware, and a backup from New York had arrived at Chester. These two factors allowed him to assemble an army in the Jerseys strong enough to take Fort Mercer, without stretching his forces in Philadelphia too thin. Still considering it extremely important to fully open the navigation of the Delaware, he sent Lord Cornwallis out around 1 a.m. on the 17th, with a significant number of troops to Chester. From there, his lordship crossed over to Billingsport, where he met up with the reinforcements from New York.

November 17.

General Washington received immediate intelligence of the march of this detachment, which he communicated to General Varnum with orders that fort Mercer should be defended to the last extremity. With a view to military operations in that quarter, he ordered one division of the army to cross the river at Burlington, and despatched expresses to the northern troops who were marching on by brigades, directing them to move down the Delaware on its northern side until they should receive farther orders.

General Washington quickly learned about the movement of this detachment, which he relayed to General Varnum along with orders to defend Fort Mercer at all costs. To support military operations in that area, he ordered one division of the army to cross the river at Burlington and sent messages to the northern troops, who were advancing in brigades, instructing them to move down the northern side of the Delaware until they got further orders.

Fort Mercer evacuated.

Major General Greene, an officer who had been distinguished early in the war by the Commander-in-chief for the solidity of his judgment and his military talents, was selected for this expedition. A hope was entertained that he would be able, not only to protect fort Mercer, but to obtain some decisive advantage over Lord Cornwallis; as the situation of the fort, which his lordship could not invest without placing himself between Timber and Manto Creeks, would expose the assailants to great peril from a respectable force in their rear. But, before Greene could cross the Delaware, Lord Cornwallis approached with an army rendered more powerful than had been expected by the junction of the reinforcement from New York; and fort Mercer was evacuated.

Major General Greene, an officer who had been recognized early in the war by the Commander-in-chief for his solid judgment and military skills, was chosen for this mission. There was hope that he could not only defend Fort Mercer but also gain a significant advantage over Lord Cornwallis; the location of the fort meant that his lordship couldn't attack without putting himself between Timber and Manto Creeks, which would expose his forces to serious risk from a strong force behind them. However, before Greene could cross the Delaware, Lord Cornwallis advanced with an army that was stronger than expected due to reinforcements from New York, and Fort Mercer was evacuated.

A few of the smaller galleys escaped up the river, and the others were burnt by their crews.

A few of the smaller ships managed to get away up the river, while the rest were set on fire by their crews.

Washington still hoped to recover much of what had been lost. A victory would restore the Jersey shore, and this object was deemed so important, that General Greene's instructions indicated the expectation that he would be in a condition to fight Lord Cornwallis.

Washington still hoped to regain much of what had been lost. A victory would bring back the Jersey shore, and this goal was considered so important that General Greene's instructions showed the expectation that he would be ready to confront Lord Cornwallis.

That judicious officer feared the reproach of avoiding an action less than the just censure of sacrificing the real interests of his country by engaging the enemy on disadvantageous terms. The numbers of the British exceeded his, even counting his militia as regulars; and he determined to wait for Glover's brigade, which was marching from the north. Before its arrival, Lord Cornwallis took post on Gloucester Point, a point of land making deep into the Delaware, which was entirely under cover of the guns of the ships, from which place he was embarking his baggage and the provisions he had collected for Philadelphia.[73]

That careful officer was worried about the criticism he might face for not acting, rather than the real risk of harming his country’s interests by engaging the enemy on unfavorable terms. The British forces outnumbered his, even when including his militia as regular troops; so he decided to wait for Glover's brigade, which was coming from the north. Before they arrived, Lord Cornwallis positioned himself at Gloucester Point, a piece of land that jutted deep into the Delaware River, which was completely shielded by the cannons from the ships. From there, he was loading his baggage and the supplies he had gathered for Philadelphia.[73]

Believing that Lord Cornwallis would immediately follow the magazines he had collected, and that the purpose of Sir William Howe was, with his united forces, to attack the American army while divided, General Washington ordered Greene to recross the Delaware, and join the army.

Believing that Lord Cornwallis would quickly pursue the supplies he had gathered and that Sir William Howe's intention was to attack the American army while it was split, General Washington instructed Greene to cross back over the Delaware and rejoin the army.

The enemy succeeds in opening a free communication with his fleet.

Thus after one continued struggle of more than six weeks, in which the continental troops displayed great military virtues, the army in Philadelphia secured itself in the possession of that city, by opening a free communication with the fleet.[74]

Thus, after a relentless effort lasting over six weeks, during which the continental troops showed remarkable military skills, the army in Philadelphia secured control of the city by establishing open communication with the fleet.[74]

While Lord Cornwallis was in Jersey, and General Greene on the Delaware above him, the reinforcements from the north being received, Washington urged to attack Philadelphia.an attack on Philadelphia was strongly pressed by several officers high in rank; and was in some measure urged by that torrent of public opinion, which, if not resisted by a very firm mind, overwhelms the judgment, and by controlling measures not well comprehended, may frequently produce, especially in military transactions, the most disastrous effects.

While Lord Cornwallis was in Jersey and General Greene was on the Delaware River upstream, reinforcements from the north arrived. Washington was encouraged to attack Philadelphia. Several high-ranking officers strongly pushed for an attack on Philadelphia, fueled in part by a wave of public opinion that, if not countered by a strong will, can cloud judgment and lead to poorly understood actions that often result in disastrous consequences, especially in military operations.

It was stated to the Commander-in-chief, that his army was now in greater force than he could expect it to be at any future time; that being joined by the troops who had conquered Burgoyne, his own reputation, the reputation of his army, the opinion of congress, and of the nation, required some decisive blow on his part. That the rapid depreciation of the paper currency, by which the resources for carrying on the war were dried up, rendered indispensable some grand effort to bring it to a speedy termination.

It was brought to the Commander-in-chief's attention that his army was now stronger than it would be at any future point. With the addition of the troops who had defeated Burgoyne, his own reputation, the reputation of his army, and the views of Congress and the nation demanded some decisive action from him. The rapid decline of the paper currency, which was depleting the resources needed to sustain the war, made it essential to make a significant effort to bring it to a quick conclusion.

The plan proposed was, that General Greene should embark two thousand men at Dunks' ferry, and descending the Delaware in the night, land in the town just before day, attack the enemy in the rear, and take possession of the bridge over the Schuylkill. That a strong corps should march down on the west side of that river, occupy the heights enfilading the works of the enemy, and open a brisk cannonade upon them, while a detachment from it should march down to the bridge, and attack in front at the same instant, that the party descending the river should commence its assault on the rear.

The proposed plan was for General Greene to take two thousand men from Dunks' ferry, go down the Delaware at night, land in the town just before dawn, attack the enemy from behind, and secure the bridge over the Schuylkill. A strong force would march along the west side of the river, take control of the heights overlooking the enemy's fortifications, and start a heavy cannon fire on them, while a group from this force would move to the bridge and launch a front attack at the same time the team coming down the river would begin their assault from the rear.

Not only the Commander-in-chief, but some of his best officers, those who could not be impelled by the clamours of the ill-informed to ruin the public interests, were opposed to this mad enterprise.

Not just the Commander-in-Chief, but some of his top officers, those who couldn’t be swayed by the cries of the misinformed to jeopardize the public good, were against this reckless venture.

The two armies, they said, were now nearly equal in point of numbers, and the detachment under Lord Cornwallis could not be supposed to have so weakened Sir William Howe as to compensate for the advantages of his position. His right was covered by the Delaware, his left by the Schuylkill, his rear by the junction of those two rivers, as well as by the city of Philadelphia, and his front by a line of redoubts extending from river to river, and connected by an abattis, and by circular works. It would be indispensably necessary to carry all these redoubts; since to leave a part of them to play on the rear of the columns, while engaged in front with the enemy in Philadelphia, would be extremely hazardous.

The two armies, they said, were now almost equal in numbers, and the units led by Lord Cornwallis couldn’t have weakened Sir William Howe enough to make up for the advantages of his position. His right was protected by the Delaware River, his left by the Schuylkill River, his rear by the confluence of those two rivers and the city of Philadelphia, and his front by a line of fortifications stretching from river to river, connected by obstacles and circular defenses. It was absolutely necessary to take all these fortifications; leaving some of them intact while engaging the enemy in Philadelphia would be very risky.

Supposing the redoubts carried, and the British army driven into the town, yet all military men were agreed on the great peril of storming a town. The streets would be defended by an artillery greatly superior to that of the Americans, which would attack in front, while the brick houses would be lined with musketeers, whose first must thin the ranks of the assailants.

Supposing the forts were taken and the British army pushed into the town, all military experts agreed on the serious danger of attacking a city. The streets would be defended by artillery much stronger than that of the Americans, which would fire from the front, while the brick buildings would be lined with soldiers armed with muskets, whose first shots would reduce the numbers of the attackers.

A part of the plan, on the successful execution of which the whole depended, was, that the British rear should be surprised by the corps descending the Delaware. This would require the concurrence of too many favourable circumstances to be calculated on with any confidence. As the position of General Greene was known, it could not be supposed that Sir William Howe would be inattentive to him. It was probable that not even his embarkation would be made unnoticed; but it was presuming a degree of negligence which ought not to be assumed, to suppose that he could descend the river to Philadelphia undiscovered. So soon as his movements should be observed, the whole plan would be comprehended, since it would never be conjectured that General Greene was to attack singly.

A key part of the plan, which the entire operation depended on, was that the British rear would be caught off guard by the troops coming down the Delaware. This would need a lot of favorable circumstances to be reliable. Since General Greene's position was known, it wouldn't be expected that Sir William Howe would ignore him. It was likely that even his departure wouldn't go unnoticed; but it would be assuming too much negligence to think he could move down the river to Philadelphia without being detected. As soon as his movements were spotted, the whole plan would be clear, since it would never be imagined that General Greene would attack alone.

If the attack in front should fail, which was not even improbable, the total loss of the two thousand men in the rear must follow; and General Howe would maintain his superiority through the winter.

If the attack in front fails, which is pretty likely, the complete loss of the two thousand men in the back would follow; and General Howe would still be in control throughout the winter.

The situation of America did not require these desperate measures. The British general would be compelled to risk a battle on equal terms, or to manifest a conscious inferiority to the American army. The depreciation of paper money was the inevitable consequence of immense emissions without corresponding taxes. It was by removing the cause, not by sacrificing the army, that this evil was to be corrected.

The situation in America didn’t call for these extreme actions. The British general would have to either risk fighting on equal ground or show that he was inferior to the American army. The decline in the value of paper money was the unavoidable result of massive printing without matching taxes. This issue needed to be fixed by addressing the root cause, not by putting the army at risk.

Washington possessed too much discernment to be dazzled by the false brilliant presented by those who urged the necessity of storming Philadelphia, in order to throw lustre round his own fame, and that of his army; and too much firmness of temper, too much virtue and real patriotism, to be diverted from a purpose believed to be right, by the clamours of faction or the discontents of ignorance. Disregarding the importunities of mistaken friends, the malignant insinuations of enemies, and the expectations of the ill-informed; he persevered in his resolution to make no attempt on Philadelphia. He saved his army, and was able to keep the field in the face of his enemy; while the clamour of the moment wasted in air, and is forgotten.

Washington had too much insight to be impressed by the false glory suggested by those who pushed for storming Philadelphia to enhance his own fame and that of his army. He also had too much steadfastness, virtue, and genuine patriotism to be swayed from a course he believed to be right by the demands of factions or the frustrations of ignorance. Ignoring the persistent pleas of misguided friends, the spiteful hints from enemies, and the expectations of those who were poorly informed, he remained committed to his decision not to attack Philadelphia. He saved his army and was able to maintain his presence on the battlefield despite the noise of the moment fading into obscurity.

The opinion that Sir William Howe meditated an attack on the American camp, was not ill founded. Scarcely had Lord Cornwallis returned to Philadelphia, and Greene to the American army, when unquestionable intelligence was received that the British general was preparing to march out in full strength, with the avowed object of forcing Washington from his position, and driving him beyond the mountains.

The belief that Sir William Howe was planning an attack on the American camp was not unfounded. Hardly had Lord Cornwallis returned to Philadelphia and Greene to the American army when reliable information came in that the British general was getting ready to march out with full force, with the clear intention of pushing Washington from his position and driving him beyond the mountains.

General Howe marches out to Chestnut Hill.

On the 4th of December, Captain M'Lane, a vigilant officer on the lines, discovered that an attempt to surprise the American camp at White Marsh was about to be made, and communicated the information to the Commander-in-chief. In the evening of the same day, General Howe marched out of Philadelphia with his whole force; and, about eleven at night, M'Lane, who had been detached with one hundred chosen men, attacked the British van at the Three Mile Run, on the Germantown road, and compelled their front division to change its line of march. He hovered on the front and flank of the advancing army, galling them severely until three next morning, when the British encamped on Chestnut Hill, in front of the American right, and distant from it about three miles. A slight skirmish had also taken place between the Pennsylvania militia under General Irvine, and the advanced light parties of the enemy, in which the general was wounded, and the militia, without much other loss, were dispersed.

On December 4th, Captain M'Lane, an alert officer on the lines, discovered that there was a plan to surprise the American camp at White Marsh and shared this information with the Commander-in-chief. That evening, General Howe left Philadelphia with his full force. Around eleven at night, M'Lane, who had been sent out with a hundred selected men, attacked the British advance guard at the Three Mile Run on the Germantown road, forcing their front division to change its path. He stayed on the front and flank of the advancing army, inflicting significant injury until three o'clock the next morning, when the British set up camp on Chestnut Hill, about three miles in front of the American right. A minor skirmish also occurred between the Pennsylvania militia under General Irvine and the enemy's forward light troops, in which the general got injured, and the militia were dispersed with little other loss.

The range of hills on which the British were posted, approached nearer to those occupied by the Americans, as they stretched northward.

The range of hills where the British were stationed got closer to those held by the Americans as they extended northward.

Having passed the day in reconnoitring the right, Sir William Howe changed his ground in the course of the night, and moving along the hills to his right, took an advantageous position, about a mile in front of the American left. The next day he inclined still farther to his right, and, in doing so, approached still nearer to the left wing of the American army. Supposing a general engagement to be approaching, Washington detached Gist with some Maryland militia, and Morgan with his rifle corps, to attack the flanking and advanced parties of the enemy. A sharp action ensued, in which Major Morris, of Jersey, a brave officer in Morgan's regiment, was mortally wounded, and twenty-seven of his men were killed and wounded. A small loss was also sustained in the militia. The parties first attacked were driven in; but the enemy reinforcing in numbers, and Washington, unwilling to move from the heights, and engage on the ground which was the scene of the skirmish, declining to reinforce Gist and Morgan, they, in turn, were compelled to retreat.

After spending the day scouting the right side, Sir William Howe changed his position during the night, moving along the hills to his right and taking a strong position about a mile in front of the American left. The next day, he moved even farther to the right, getting closer to the left wing of the American army. Thinking a general battle was about to happen, Washington sent Gist with some Maryland militia and Morgan with his rifle corps to attack the enemy's flanking and forward units. A fierce fight broke out, during which Major Morris from Jersey, a courageous officer in Morgan's regiment, was mortally wounded, and twenty-seven of his men were killed or injured. The militia also suffered some losses. The first groups attacked were forced back; however, as the enemy brought in reinforcements and Washington was hesitant to leave the heights and fight on the ground where the skirmish occurred, he chose not to send additional support to Gist and Morgan, which ultimately forced them to retreat.

Returns to Philadelphia.

Sir William Howe continued to manoeuvre towards the flank, and in front of the left wing of the American army. Expecting to be attacked in that quarter in full force, Washington made such changes in the disposition of his troops as the occasion required; and the day was consumed in these movements. In the course of it, the American chief rode through every brigade of his army, delivering, in person, his orders, respecting the manner of receiving the enemy, exhorting his troops to rely principally on the bayonet, and encouraging them by the steady firmness of his countenance, as well as by his words, to a vigorous performance of their duty.[75] The dispositions of the evening indicated an intention to attack him the ensuing morning; but in the afternoon of the eighth, the British suddenly filed off from their right, which extended beyond the American left, and retreated to Philadelphia. The parties detached to harass their rear could not overtake it.

Sir William Howe continued to maneuver toward the flank and in front of the left side of the American army. Anticipating a strong attack in that area, Washington made adjustments to the positioning of his troops as needed; the day was spent executing these movements. During the day, the American commander rode through every brigade of his army, personally delivering orders on how to engage the enemy, urging his troops to mainly rely on the bayonet, and inspiring them with both the steady determination on his face and his words to perform their duties vigorously.[75] The evening's arrangements suggested an intention to attack him the next morning; however, in the afternoon of the eighth, the British suddenly shifted away from their right, which extended beyond the American left, and retreated to Philadelphia. The groups sent to disrupt their rear were unable to catch up.

The loss of the British in this expedition, as stated in the official letter of General Howe, rather exceeded one hundred in killed, wounded, and missing; and was sustained principally in the skirmish of the 7th, in which Major Morris fell.

The British losses in this expedition, as mentioned in General Howe's official letter, were actually over a hundred in total, including killed, wounded, and missing. Most of these losses occurred during the skirmish on the 7th, where Major Morris was killed.

On no former occasion had the two armies met, uncovered by works, with superior numbers on the side of the Americans. The effective force of the British was then stated at twelve thousand men. It has been since declared by an author[76] who then belonged to it, but who, though a candid writer, appears to have imbibed prejudices against Sir William Howe, to have amounted to fourteen thousand. The American army consisted of precisely twelve thousand one hundred and sixty-one continental troops, and three thousand two hundred and forty-one militia. This equality in point of numbers, rendered it a prudent precaution to maintain a superiority of position. As the two armies occupied heights fronting each other, neither could attack without giving to its adversary some advantage in the ground; and this was an advantage which neither seemed willing to relinquish.

On no previous occasion had the two armies faced each other, unprotected by any fortifications, with the Americans having the larger force. The British effective strength was reported to be twelve thousand men. It was later claimed by an author[76] who was part of that army, that the number was actually fourteen thousand, although he was a fair writer and seemed to hold biases against Sir William Howe. The American army had exactly twelve thousand one hundred and sixty-one Continental troops and three thousand two hundred and forty-one militia. This balance in numbers made it wise to maintain a positional advantage. As the two armies were stationed on opposing heights, neither could attack without giving their opponent some advantage in the terrain; and this was an advantage that neither was willing to give up.

The return of Sir William Howe to Philadelphia without bringing on an action, after marching out with the avowed intention of fighting, is the best testimony of the respect which he felt for the talents of his adversary, and the courage of the troops he was to encounter.

The return of Sir William Howe to Philadelphia without engaging in a battle, after setting out with the clear intention of fighting, is the best proof of the respect he had for his opponent's skills and the bravery of the troops he was about to face.

The cold was now becoming so intense that it was impossible for an army neither well clothed, nor sufficiently supplied with blankets, longer to keep the field in tents. It had become necessary to place the troops in winter quarters; but in the existing state of things the choice of winter quarters was a subject for serious reflection. It was impossible to place them in villages without uncovering the country, or exposing them to the hazard of being beaten in detachment.

The cold was becoming so severe that it was impossible for an army that wasn't properly dressed or had enough blankets to stay in the field in tents any longer. It was essential to move the troops into winter quarters; however, given the current situation, choosing those quarters required careful thought. It was not feasible to put them in villages without revealing the area or putting them at risk of being defeated in smaller groups.

To avoid these calamities, it was determined to take a strong position in the neighbourhood of Philadelphia, equally distant from the Delaware above and below that city; and there to construct huts, in the form of a regular encampment, which might cover the army during the winter. A strong piece of ground at Valley Forge, on the west side of the Schuylkill, between twenty and thirty miles from Philadelphia, was selected for that purpose; and some time before day on the morning of the 11th of December, the army marched to take possession of it. By an accidental concurrence of circumstances, Lord Cornwallis had been detached the same morning at the head of a strong corps, on a foraging party on the west side of the Schuylkill. He had fallen in with a brigade of Pennsylvania militia commanded by General Potter, which he soon dispersed; and, pursuing the fugitives, had gained the heights opposite Matron's ford, over which the Americans had thrown a bridge for the purpose of crossing the river, and had posted troops to command the defile called the Gulph, just as the front division of the American army reached the bank of the river. This movement had been made without any knowledge of the intention of General Washington to change his position, or any design of contesting the passage of the Schuylkill; but the troops had been posted in the manner already mentioned for the sole purpose of covering the foraging party.

To prevent these disasters, it was decided to establish a strong position near Philadelphia, equally distant from the Delaware River both upstream and downstream of the city; and there to build huts in the form of a regular camp to shelter the army through the winter. A solid piece of land at Valley Forge, on the west side of the Schuylkill River, about twenty to thirty miles from Philadelphia, was chosen for this purpose; and before dawn on the morning of December 11th, the army marched to occupy it. By chance, that same morning, Lord Cornwallis had been sent out at the head of a strong unit on a foraging mission on the west side of the Schuylkill. He encountered a brigade of Pennsylvania militia led by General Potter, which he swiftly dispersed; and while chasing the fleeing troops, he gained the heights opposite Matron's Ford, where the Americans had built a bridge to cross the river, and had stationed troops to oversee the narrow passage called the Gulph, just as the front division of the American army reached the riverbank. This maneuver was executed without any knowledge of General Washington's intention to relocate or any plan to contest the passage of the Schuylkill; the troops had been positioned as mentioned solely to support the foraging party.

Washington apprehended, from his first intelligence, that General Howe had taken the field in full force. He therefore recalled the troops already on the west side, and moved rather higher up the river, for the purpose of understanding the real situation, force, and designs of the enemy. The next day Lord Cornwallis returned to Philadelphia; and, in the course of the night, the American army crossed the river.

Washington realized right away from his first report that General Howe had deployed his full army. So, he called back the troops that were already on the west side and moved further up the river to get a better grasp of the enemy's real situation, strength, and plans. The next day, Lord Cornwallis went back to Philadelphia; and during the night, the American army crossed the river.

General Washington goes into winter quarters.

Here the Commander-in-chief communicated to his army, in general orders, the manner in which he intended to dispose of them during the winter. He expressed, in strong terms, his approbation of their conduct, presented them with an encouraging state of the future prospects of their country, exhorted them to bear with continuing fortitude the hardships inseparable from the position they were about to take, and endeavoured to convince their judgments that those hardships were not imposed on them by unfeeling caprice, but were necessary for the good of their country.

Here, the Commander-in-chief informed his army through general orders about how he planned to organize them for the winter. He strongly praised their behavior, gave them an encouraging outlook on the future of their country, urged them to endure the hardships that would come with their new situation, and tried to convince them that these difficulties weren't just random acts of cruelty, but essential for the welfare of their country.

The winter had set in with great severity, and the sufferings of the army were extreme. In a few days, however, these sufferings were considerably diminished by the erection of logged huts, filled up with mortar, which, after being dried, formed comfortable habitations, and gave content to men long unused to the conveniences of life. The order of a regular encampment was observed; and the only appearance of winter quarters, was the substitution of huts for tents.

The winter had come in harshly, and the army was suffering greatly. However, within a few days, this suffering was greatly reduced by the construction of log cabins, filled with mortar, which, after drying, created comfortable living spaces and provided comfort to men who were not used to life's conveniences. A structured camp setup was maintained, and the only change for winter quarters was the replacement of tents with huts.


CHAPTER X.

Inquiry into the conduct of General Schuyler.... Burgoyne appears before Ticonderoga.... Evacuation of that place,... of Skeensborough.... Colonel Warner defeated.... Evacuation of fort Anne.... Proclamation of Burgoyne.... Counter-proclamation of Schuyler.... Burgoyne approaches fort Edward.... Schuyler retires to Saratoga,... to Stillwater.... St. Leger invests fort Schuyler.... Herkimer defeated.... Colonel Baum detached to Bennington.... is defeated.... Breckman defeated.... St. Leger abandons the siege of fort Schuyler.... Murder of Miss M'Crea.... General Gates takes command.... Burgoyne encamps on the heights of Saratoga.... Battle of Stillwater.... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga.... Capitulates.... The British take forts Montgomery and Clinton.... The forts Independence and Constitution evacuated by the Americans.... Ticonderoga evacuated by the British.

Investigation into General Schuyler's actions.... Burgoyne shows up at Ticonderoga.... Evacuation of that location,... of Skeensborough.... Colonel Warner is defeated.... Evacuation of Fort Anne.... Burgoyne's proclamation.... Counter-proclamation from Schuyler.... Burgoyne approaches Fort Edward.... Schuyler withdraws to Saratoga,... to Stillwater.... St. Leger lays siege to Fort Schuyler.... Herkimer is defeated.... Colonel Baum is sent to Bennington.... is defeated.... Breckman is defeated.... St. Leger ends the siege of Fort Schuyler.... Murder of Miss M'Crea.... General Gates takes command.... Burgoyne camps on the heights of Saratoga.... Battle of Stillwater.... Burgoyne retreats to Saratoga.... Surrenders.... The British capture Forts Montgomery and Clinton.... The Americans evacuate Forts Independence and Constitution.... Ticonderoga is evacuated by the British.

 

1777

While, with inferior numbers, General Washington maintained a stubborn contest in the middle states, events of great variety and importance were passing in the north.

While, with fewer troops, General Washington fiercely fought in the middle states, important and diverse events were unfolding in the north.

After Sir Guy Carleton had distributed his army, for winter quarters, in the several villages from the Isle Aux Noix and Montreal to Quebec, General Burgoyne, who had served under him, embarked for England, in order to communicate a full statement of affairs in the northern department; and to assist in making arrangements for the ensuing campaign. The American army, having been formed for only one year, dissolved of itself at the expiration of that term, and could scarcely furnish even the appearance of garrisons in their forts.

After Sir Guy Carleton had assigned his army to winter quarters in various villages from Isle Aux Noix and Montreal to Quebec, General Burgoyne, who had served under him, left for England to provide a complete update on the situation in the northern department and to help make plans for the upcoming campaign. The American army, which had only been formed for a year, disbanded on its own at the end of that term and could barely maintain even a semblance of garrisons in their forts.

The defence of this frontier was assigned to the regiments directed to be raised in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and the northwestern parts of New York; but the recruiting service advanced so slowly, and so much difficulty was found in clothing and arming those who were enlisted, that it became indispensable to call in the aid of the militia; and the plan of the campaign on the part of the British was involved in so much obscurity that General Washington deemed it adviseable to direct eight of the regiments of Massachusetts to rendezvous at Peekskill.

The defense of this frontier was given to the regiments that were supposed to be raised in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and the northwestern areas of New York. However, the recruiting process was very slow, and there were significant challenges in providing uniforms and weapons to those who had signed up. Because of this, it was necessary to enlist the help of the militia. The British campaign plan was so unclear that General Washington thought it wise to order eight of the Massachusetts regiments to gather at Peekskill.

An inquiry into the conduct of General Schuyler, which terminates to his honour.
May 22.

The service of General Schuyler in the northern department had been more solid than brilliant. Dissatisfied with his situation, and disgusted with the injustice[77] he supposed himself to experience, he had for some time meditated a resignation, and had been retained in the service only by the deep interest he felt in the struggle of his country for independence. So soon as his fears for Ticonderoga were removed by the partial opening of Lake Champlain, he waited in person on congress for the purpose of adjusting his accounts, obtaining an inquiry into his conduct, and supporting those necessary measures of defence in the north, which were suggested by his perfect knowledge of the country. At his request, a committee, consisting of a member from each state, was appointed to inquire into his conduct during the time he had held a command in the army. The arduous services performed by this meritorious officer, when investigated, were found so far to exceed any estimate which had been made of them, that congress deemed it essential to the public interest to prevail on him to retain his commission. The resolution which fixed his head quarters at Albany was repealed, and he was directed to proceed forthwith to the northern department, and to take the command of it.

The service of General Schuyler in the northern department had been more solid than flashy. Unhappy with his position and frustrated by the unfairness he believed he was facing, he had considered resigning for some time but stayed in service because he cared deeply about his country’s fight for independence. Once his concerns for Ticonderoga eased with the partial opening of Lake Champlain, he personally went to Congress to settle his accounts, request an inquiry into his actions, and advocate for essential defensive measures in the north, based on his thorough knowledge of the area. At his request, a committee with one member from each state was formed to look into his conduct while he was in command. The intense work completed by this commendable officer, upon review, surpassed any prior estimates, leading Congress to recognize that it was crucial for the public interest to convince him to keep his commission. The decision that had placed his headquarters in Albany was overturned, and he was ordered to immediately return to the northern department and take command.

On his arrival, he found the army of the north not only too weak for the objects entrusted to it, but badly supplied with arms, clothes, and provisions. From a spy who had been seized near Onion River, he obtained information that General Burgoyne was at Quebec, and was to command the British forces in that department so soon as they should march out of Canada. That while Ticonderoga should be attacked by the main army, Sir John Johnson, with a strong body of British, Canadians, and Indians, was to penetrate to the Mohawk by Oswego, and place himself between fort Stanwix and fort Edward.

Upon his arrival, he discovered that the northern army was not only too weak for the tasks assigned to it, but also poorly equipped with weapons, clothing, and supplies. From a spy who had been captured near Onion River, he learned that General Burgoyne was at Quebec and was set to lead the British forces in that area as soon as they moved out of Canada. While the main army would attack Ticonderoga, Sir John Johnson, along with a strong group of British, Canadians, and Indians, would advance to the Mohawk via Oswego and position himself between Fort Stanwix and Fort Edward.

Burgoyne appears before Ticonderoga.

General Schuyler was sensible of the danger which threatened him, and made every exertion to meet it. After completing his arrangements at Ticonderoga for sustaining a siege, he had proceeded to Albany, for the purpose of attending to his supplies, and of expediting the march of reinforcements, when he received intelligence from General St. Clair, who was entrusted with the defence of Ticonderoga, that Burgoyne had appeared before that place.

General Schuyler was aware of the danger he faced and did everything he could to address it. After finalizing his plans at Ticonderoga for withstanding a siege, he went to Albany to manage supplies and speed up the arrival of reinforcements. It was there that he received news from General St. Clair, who was responsible for defending Ticonderoga, that Burgoyne had shown up outside the fort.

In the course of the preceding winter, a plan for penetrating to the Hudson, from Canada, by the way of the lakes, had been digested in the cabinet of London. General Burgoyne, who assisted in forming it, was entrusted with its execution, and was to lead a formidable army against Ticonderoga as soon as the season would permit. At the same time a smaller party under Colonel St. Leger, composed of Canadians, newly raised Americans, and a few Europeans, aided by a powerful body of Indians, was to march from Oswego, to enter the country by the way of the Mohawk, and to join the grand army on the Hudson.

During the previous winter, a plan was developed in the London cabinet to reach the Hudson from Canada via the lakes. General Burgoyne, who helped create this plan, was given the responsibility to carry it out and was set to lead a strong army against Ticonderoga as soon as the weather allowed. At the same time, a smaller group led by Colonel St. Leger, made up of Canadians, newly recruited Americans, and a few Europeans, supported by a large number of Indians, was to march from Oswego, enter the region through the Mohawk, and join the main army on the Hudson.

January 22.

Burgoyne reached Quebec as soon as it was practicable to sail up the St. Lawrence, and appeared in full force on the river Bouquet, on the western banks of lake Champlain, much earlier than the American general had supposed to be possible. At this place he met the Indians in a grand council, after which he gave them a war feast. Much of the cruelty afterwards perpetrated by the savages has been attributed to this unfortunate officer; but justice requires the admission that his speech was calculated rather to diminish than increase their habitual ferocity. He endeavoured to impress on them the distinction between enemies in the field, and the unarmed inhabitants, many of whom were friends; and, addressing himself to their avarice, promised rewards for prisoners, but none for scalps. It was perhaps fortunate for America, that, in some instances, peculiarly calculated to excite and interest the human feelings, these feeble restraints were disregarded.

Burgoyne arrived in Quebec as soon as it was feasible to sail up the St. Lawrence and showed up in full force on the Bouquet River, on the western shore of Lake Champlain, much earlier than the American general had thought possible. There, he held a grand council with the Indians, after which he hosted them for a war feast. A lot of the brutality that was later committed by the natives has been blamed on this unfortunate officer; however, it's fair to acknowledge that his speech was intended more to reduce than to increase their usual viciousness. He tried to make them understand the difference between enemies in battle and the unarmed civilians, many of whom were friends; and, appealing to their greed, he promised rewards for captives, but none for scalps. It may have been fortunate for America that, in some cases particularly likely to stir up and appeal to human emotions, these weak restraints were ignored.

After publishing a manifesto at Putnam River, designed to act on the hopes and fears of the people of the country through which he was to pass, he halted a few days at Crown Point, to make the necessary dispositions for investing Ticonderoga.

After publishing a manifesto at Putnam River, meant to address the hopes and fears of the people in the area he would be traveling through, he stopped for a few days at Crown Point to make the necessary arrangements for attacking Ticonderoga.

June 30.

From Crown Point, the royal army advanced on both sides the lake, keeping up a communication between its divisions, by means of the fleet; and on the 1st of July encamped within four miles of the American works. A strong party was pushed forward to Three Mile Point; and the fleet anchored just beyond the range of the guns of the fort. July 1.The next day they took possession, without opposition, of the important post at Mount Hope, which commanded, in part, the lines on the northern side, and entirely cut off the communication with lake George.

From Crown Point, the royal army moved forward on both sides of the lake, maintaining communication between its units through the fleet. On July 1st, they set up camp about four miles from the American positions. A strong group advanced to Three Mile Point, while the fleet anchored just out of the fort's gun range. July 1st. The following day, they took control of the key location at Mount Hope without any resistance, which partially commanded the lines on the northern side and completely severed the communication with Lake George.

The weakness of his garrison induced General St. Clair to give up this post without a struggle. Believing it to be impracticable to support it without hazarding a general action, he determined to concentrate his force about Ticonderoga and Mount Independence.

The weakness of his garrison led General St. Clair to abandon this post without a fight. Thinking it would be unfeasible to defend it without risking a major battle, he decided to focus his troops around Ticonderoga and Mount Independence.

After taking possession of Mount Hope, the British lines were extended on the western side of Champlain, from the mountain quite to the lake, so as completely to inclose the garrison on that side. The German division under Major General Reidisel, which occupied the eastern shore of the lake, was encamped at Three Mile Point, and had pushed forward a detachment near the rivulet, which runs east of Mount Independence.

After gaining control of Mount Hope, the British forces expanded their lines on the western side of Champlain, stretching from the mountain all the way to the lake, completely surrounding the garrison on that side. The German division led by Major General Reidisel, which was stationed on the eastern shore of the lake, was camped at Three Mile Point and had sent a detachment forward near the stream that flows east of Mount Independence.

July.

The besiegers laboured assiduously to bring up their artillery and complete their works. Sugar Hill, a rugged mountain standing at the confluence of the waters that unite at Ticonderoga, which overlooks the fortress and had been thought inaccessible, was examined; and the report being that the ascent, though extremely difficult, was practicable, the work was immediately commenced, and was pressed with so much vigour that the batteries might have opened next day. The garrison was not in a condition to check these operations.

The attackers worked tirelessly to bring up their artillery and finish their fortifications. Sugar Hill, a rough mountain at the point where the waters come together at Ticonderoga, overlooks the fortress and had been considered unreachable. After assessing it, the report indicated that the climb, while very challenging, was doable. So, the work started right away and was pushed forward with such energy that the batteries could have been ready to fire the next day. The garrison was not in a position to stop these efforts.

The situation of St. Clair was now at its crisis. Only the ground between the Eastern run and the South River remained open; and this he was informed would be occupied the next day, so that the investment would be complete. The place must be immediately evacuated, or maintained at the hazard of losing the garrison when it should be no longer tenable.

The situation for St. Clair had reached a critical point. Only the area between the Eastern run and the South River was still accessible; he was told this would be occupied the next day, meaning the encirclement would be complete. The location had to be evacuated immediately, or they risked losing the garrison once it became unsustainable.

Between these cruel alternations, General St. Clair did not hesitate to choose the first; but deeming it prudent to take the advice of a council of war, he convened the general officers, who unanimously advised the immediate evacuation of the fort.

Between these harsh changes, General St. Clair didn’t hesitate to choose the first option; however, thinking it wise to seek the opinion of a council of war, he gathered the general officers, who all agreed on the immediate evacuation of the fort.

Evacuation of Ticonderoga and Mount Independence.
July 5.

Preparations for the retreat were instantly commenced. The invalids, the hospital, and such stores as could be moved in the course of the night, were put on board the batteaux, which proceeded under the guard of Colonel Long, up the South River to Skeensborough; and, before day on the morning of the 6th of July, the main body of the army directed its march to the same place.

Preparations for the retreat started right away. The injured soldiers, the hospital, and any supplies that could be moved during the night were loaded onto the batteaux, which traveled under the protection of Colonel Long up the South River to Skeensborough; and, before dawn on the morning of July 6th, the main part of the army set out for the same location.

In the hope of making considerable progress before his retreat should be discovered, General St. Clair had ordered the troops to observe the most profound silence, and, particularly, to set nothing on fire. These judicious orders were disobeyed; and, before the rear guard was in motion, the house which had been occupied by General De Fermoy was in flames. This served as a signal to the besiegers, who immediately entered the works. The main body of the retreating army was rapidly pursued by Generals Frazer and Reidisel, while General Burgoyne, in person, followed the detachment under Colonel Long.

In hopes of making significant progress before his retreat was discovered, General St. Clair instructed the troops to maintain strict silence and especially not to set anything on fire. These wise orders were ignored; and, before the rear guard moved, the house occupied by General De Fermoy was in flames. This acted as a signal to the besiegers, who quickly entered the fortifications. The main body of the retreating army was swiftly pursued by Generals Frazer and Reidisel, while General Burgoyne personally followed the detachment led by Colonel Long.

July 6.

The bridge, the boom, and those other works, the construction of which had employed the labour of ten months, were cut through by nine in the morning, so as to afford a passage for the Royal George and Inflexible frigates, as well as for the gun boats, which engaged the American galleys, about three in the afternoon, near the falls of Skeensborough.

The bridge, the boom, and the other structures, which took ten months to build, were cut through by nine in the morning to allow for the passage of the Royal George and Inflexible frigates, as well as the gunboats that fought the American galleys around three in the afternoon near the falls of Skeensborough.

The American army evacuate Skeensborough and retire to fort Anne.

In the mean time, three regiments had disembarked at some distance from the fort, with the intention of attacking it by land, and cutting off the retreat of the garrison, as well as that of the detachment in the boats and galleys. This manoeuvre being discovered, the works and batteaux were set on fire, and the troops retired to fort Anne. On this occasion, the baggage of the army, and a great quantity of military stores, were either destroyed by the Americans, or taken by the British.

In the meantime, three regiments had landed a little way from the fort, planning to attack it from land and block the garrison's escape, as well as that of the group in the boats and galleys. Once this maneuver was discovered, the defenses and boats were set on fire, and the troops fell back to Fort Anne. During this situation, the army's supplies and a large amount of military equipment were either destroyed by the Americans or captured by the British.

Knowing that he could save his army only by the rapidity of his march, General St. Clair reached Castletown, thirty miles from Ticonderoga, on the night succeeding the evacuation of the fort. The rear guard under Colonel Warner halted six miles short of that place. Having been augmented by those who from excessive fatigue had fallen out of the line of march, it amounted to rather more than one thousand men.

Knowing that he could only save his army by moving quickly, General St. Clair reached Castletown, thirty miles from Ticonderoga, on the night after the fort was evacuated. The rear guard under Colonel Warner stopped six miles short of that location. Having been joined by those who had fallen behind due to extreme fatigue, it totaled just over one thousand men.

July 7.
Colonel Warner attacked by General Frazer and obliged to retreat.

The next morning at five, they were overtaken and attacked by General Frazer with eight hundred and fifty men. The action was warm and well contested. In its commencement, two regiments of militia, which lay within two miles of Colonel Warner, were ordered to his assistance. Instead of obeying these orders, they consulted their own safety, and hastened to Castletown. Had these orders been executed, the corps which attacked Warner would probably have been cut to pieces. While the action was maintained with equal spirit on both sides, General Reidisel arrived with his division of Germans, and the Americans were routed.

The next morning at five, General Frazer and his eight hundred and fifty men caught up with them and launched an attack. The fighting was intense and fiercely contested. At the start, two regiments of militia, who were just two miles away from Colonel Warner, were ordered to help him. Instead of following those orders, they prioritized their own safety and quickly made their way to Castletown. If they had followed through with the orders, the troops that attacked Warner likely would have been defeated. While the battle continued with equal determination on both sides, General Reidisel arrived with his division of Germans, and the Americans were defeated.

In this action, Colonel Francis, several other officers, and upwards of two hundred men were left dead on the field; and one colonel, seven captains, ten subalterns, and two hundred and ten privates were made prisoners. Near six hundred are supposed to have been wounded, many of whom must have perished in attempting to escape through the woods towards the inhabited country. The British state their own loss at thirty-five killed, among whom was one field officer, and one hundred and forty-four wounded, including two majors, and five inferior officers. It is scarcely credible, notwithstanding the difference in arms, that in a well contested action, the disparity in the killed could have been so considerable. It is the less probable, as the pursuit was not of long continuance.

In this battle, Colonel Francis, several other officers, and over two hundred men were left dead on the field; and one colonel, seven captains, ten junior officers, and two hundred and ten privates were taken prisoner. Nearly six hundred are believed to have been wounded, many of whom likely died while trying to escape through the woods toward populated areas. The British report their own losses at thirty-five killed, including one field officer, and one hundred and forty-four wounded, which includes two majors and five lower-ranking officers. It's hard to believe that, despite the difference in weaponry, the number killed in such a contested battle could be so significant. This seems even less likely considering the pursuit didn’t last long.

To avoid that division of the British army which had proceeded up the North River, St. Clair changed his route; and directed his march to Rutland, to which place he ordered Warner also to retire. At Rutland he fell in with several soldiers who had been separated from their corps, and, two days afterwards, at Manchester, was joined by Warner with about ninety men. From this place he proceeded to fort Edward, where he met General Schuyler.

To prevent the split in the British army that had moved up the North River, St. Clair changed his path and marched towards Rutland, where he also told Warner to regroup. At Rutland, he encountered several soldiers who had been separated from their units, and two days later, in Manchester, he was joined by Warner and around ninety men. From there, he continued to Fort Edward, where he met General Schuyler.

After taking possession of Skeensborough, Burgoyne had found it necessary to suspend the pursuit, and to give his army refreshment. The troops were in some disorder; distinct corps were intermingled, and his detachments were far apart from each other. He determined therefore to halt a few days at that place, in order to reassemble and arrange his army.

After taking control of Skeensborough, Burgoyne realized he needed to pause the pursuit and allow his army to rest. The troops were somewhat disorganized; different units were mixed together, and his detachments were widely separated. He decided to stay in that location for a few days to regroup and organize his army.

July 7.
Colonel Long evacuates Fort Anne and retires to Fort Edward.

Colonel Long having been directed to defend fort Anne, the ninth regiment of British, under Lieutenant Colonel Hill, had been detached against that place. It being understood that the Americans were in some force, two other regiments, under Brigadier Powell, were ordered to support the first party. Before the arrival of this reinforcement, Colonel Long attacked the ninth regiment, and a sharp skirmish ensued, in which the British kept their ground, and the advantage was claimed by both parties. Hearing that a reinforcement was approaching, Long set fire to the works at fort Anne, and retired to fort Edward.

Colonel Long was ordered to defend Fort Anne, so the ninth British regiment, led by Lieutenant Colonel Hill, was sent to that location. Since it was understood that the Americans had a significant presence there, two additional regiments under Brigadier Powell were ordered to support the first group. Before this reinforcement arrived, Colonel Long attacked the ninth regiment, leading to a fierce skirmish where the British maintained their position, and both sides claimed victory. Upon hearing that reinforcement was on the way, Long set fire to the fortifications at Fort Anne and retreated to Fort Edward.

July 7.

At Stillwater, on his way to Ticonderoga, General Schuyler was informed of the evacuation of that place; and, on the same day, at Saratoga, of the loss of the stores at Skeensborough. He had heard nothing from General St. Clair; and was seriously apprehensive for that officer and his army, which, after the junction of Colonel Long, consisted of about fifteen hundred continental troops, and the same number of militia. They were dispirited by defeat, without tents, badly armed, and had lost great part of their stores and baggage. The country was generally much alarmed; and even the well affected discovered more inclination to take care of themselves than to join the army. In this gloomy state of things, no officer could have exerted more diligence and skill than were displayed by Schuyler. Having fixed his head quarters at fort Edward, he employed to the utmost advantage the short respite from action which Burgoyne unavoidably gave. The country between Skeensborough and fort Edward was almost entirely unsettled, was covered with thick woods, and of a surface extremely rough, and much intersected with creeks and morasses. Wood creek was navigable with batteaux as far as fort Anne; and military stores of every description might be transported up it. He obstructed its navigation by sinking numerous impediments in its course, broke up the bridges, and rendered the roads impassable. He was also indefatigable in driving the live stock out of the way, and in bringing from fort George to fort Edward, the ammunition and other military stores which had been deposited at that place. Still farther to delay the movements of the British, he posted Colonel Warner on their left flank, with instructions to raise the militia in that quarter. The hope was entertained, that the appearance of a respectable force, threatening the flank and rear of the invading army, would not only retard its advance, but would induce General Burgoyne to weaken it, in order to strengthen the garrison of Ticonderoga.

At Stillwater, on his way to Ticonderoga, General Schuyler learned about the evacuation of that location; and, on the same day, in Saratoga, he found out about the loss of supplies at Skeensborough. He hadn't heard a word from General St. Clair, and was seriously worried about that officer and his army, which, after joining forces with Colonel Long, consisted of about fifteen hundred Continental troops and the same number of militia. They were demoralized by defeat, lacked tents, were poorly armed, and had lost a large portion of their supplies and baggage. The area was generally very alarmed; even those who were in favor of the cause showed more interest in looking after their own safety than joining the army. In this discouraging situation, no officer could have demonstrated more diligence and skill than Schuyler did. Setting up his headquarters at Fort Edward, he made the most of the brief pause in action that Burgoyne inevitably provided. The land between Skeensborough and Fort Edward was mostly unsettled, densely forested, and extremely rough, with many creeks and swamps. Wood Creek could be navigated with batteaux as far as Fort Anne, allowing military supplies of all kinds to be transported up it. Schuyler obstructed this waterway by sinking many obstacles in its path, destroying bridges, and making the roads impassable. He also worked tirelessly to drive livestock away from the area and to transport ammunition and other military supplies that were stored at Fort George to Fort Edward. To further delay the British movements, he assigned Colonel Warner to their left flank, instructing him to recruit militia in that area. The hope was that the sight of a substantial force threatening the flank and rear of the invading army would not only slow its advance but also persuade General Burgoyne to weaken his forces to bolster the garrison at Ticonderoga.

While thus endeavoring to obstruct the march of the enemy, Schuyler was not less attentive to the best means of strengthening his own army. Reinforcements of regular troops were earnestly solicited; the militia of New England and New York were required to take the field, and all his influence in the surrounding country was exerted to reanimate the people, and to prevent their defection from the American cause.

While trying to block the enemy's advance, Schuyler was equally focused on strengthening his own army. He urgently requested reinforcements of regular troops, called for the militia from New England and New York to take action, and used all his influence in the nearby areas to motivate the people and prevent them from abandoning the American cause.

Proclamation of Burgoyne and counter-proclamation of Schuyler.

While at Skeensborough General Burgoyne issued a second proclamation[78] summoning the people of the adjacent country to send ten deputies from each township to meet Colonel Skeene at Castletown, in order to deliberate on such measures as might still be adopted to save those who had not yet conformed to his first, and submitted to the royal authority. General Schuyler apprehending some effect from this paper, issued a counter proclamation, stating the insidious designs of the enemy. Warning the inhabitants, by the example of Jersey, of the danger to which their yielding to this seductive proposition would expose them, and giving them the most solemn assurances that all who should send deputies to this meeting, or in any manner aid the enemy, would be considered traitors, and should suffer the utmost rigour of the law.

While at Skeensborough, General Burgoyne issued a second proclamation[78] asking the people from the neighboring areas to send ten representatives from each township to meet Colonel Skeene at Castletown. This was to discuss potential actions that could still be taken to save those who hadn’t yet submitted to his first demand and accepted royal authority. General Schuyler, concerned about the impact of this proclamation, issued a counter-proclamation highlighting the enemy's deceitful intentions. He warned the residents, using Jersey as an example, about the risks they would face if they gave in to this tempting offer and provided firm assurances that anyone who sent representatives to this meeting or assisted the enemy in any way would be deemed a traitor and face severe legal consequences.

The evacuation of Ticonderoga was a shock for which no part of the United States was prepared. Neither the strength of the invading army, nor of the garrison had been understood. When therefore intelligence was received that a place, on the fortifications of which much money and labour had been expended, which was considered as the key to the whole northwestern country, and supposed to contain a garrison nearly equal to the invading army, had been abandoned without a siege; that an immense train of artillery, and all the military stores, had either fallen into the hands of the enemy, or been destroyed; that the army, on its retreat, had been attacked, defeated, and dispersed; astonishment pervaded all ranks of men; and the conduct of the officers was universally condemned. Congress recalled all the generals of the department, and directed an inquiry into their conduct. Throughout New England especially, the most bitter aspersions were cast on them and General Schuyler, who, from some unknown cause, had never been viewed with favour in that part of the continent, was involved in the common charge of treachery, to which this accumulation of unlooked-for calamity was generally attributed by the mass of the people.

The evacuation of Ticonderoga was a shock that no part of the United States was ready for. The strength of both the invading army and the garrison had been misunderstood. So when news came that a place, where a lot of money and effort had been invested, considered the key to the entire northwestern region, and believed to have a garrison nearly equal to the invading army, had been abandoned without a siege; that an enormous amount of artillery and all military supplies had either fallen into enemy hands or been destroyed; and that the army, during its retreat, had been attacked, defeated, and scattered; shock spread through all levels of society, and the actions of the officers were widely criticized. Congress recalled all the generals from the department and ordered an investigation into their actions. Especially in New England, they faced vicious accusations, and General Schuyler, who for some unknown reason had never been looked upon favorably in that part of the continent, was included in the widespread claims of treachery, with the general public blaming this unexpected disaster on him.

On the representations of General Washington, the recall of the officers was suspended, until he should be of opinion that the service would not suffer by the measure; and, on a full inquiry afterwards made into their conduct, they were acquitted of all blame.

On the representations of General Washington, the recall of the officers was put on hold until he believed that the service wouldn't be negatively impacted by the decision; and, after a thorough investigation into their conduct, they were cleared of any wrongdoing.

In a letter of St. Clair to the Commander-in-chief, stating his motives for evacuating Ticonderoga, he represented the strength of his garrison, including nine hundred militia, who would consent to stay but a few days, at only three thousand effective rank and file, many of whom were without bayonets. The lines required ten thousand to man them properly. He also affirmed, that his supply of provisions was sufficient for only twenty days, and that the works on the Ticonderoga side were incomplete, with their flanks undefended. He justified his having failed to call in a larger reinforcement of militia, by the scarcity of provisions, the supply on hand not having been procured until General Schuyler had resumed the command in the department; and attributed his not having evacuated the place in time to preserve his army and stores, to the prevalent opinion that there was not a sufficient force in Canada to attempt so hardy an enterprise, and to his not being at liberty to adopt that measure but in the last necessity.

In a letter from St. Clair to the Commander-in-chief explaining his reasons for evacuating Ticonderoga, he noted that his garrison strength was only about three thousand effective soldiers, including nine hundred militia who would only agree to stay for a few days, many of whom were lacking bayonets. The lines required ten thousand troops to defend them properly. He also mentioned that his food supplies were only enough for twenty days and that the defenses on the Ticonderoga side were incomplete and had unprotected flanks. He explained that he didn’t call for a larger reinforcement of militia due to the shortage of provisions, which hadn’t been gathered until General Schuyler took command in the department. He also said his delay in evacuating the place in time to save his army and supplies was due to the common belief that there wasn't enough force in Canada to take on such a bold move and that he couldn't consider that action until it was absolutely necessary.

A court of inquiry justified his conduct, and he retained the confidence of the Commander-in-chief.

A court of inquiry validated his actions, and he kept the trust of the Commander-in-chief.

On learning the distressed state of the remnant of the army, General Washington made great exertions to repair its losses, and to reinforce it. The utmost industry was used to procure a supply of tents; artillery and ammunition were forwarded from Massachusetts; the remaining troops of that state were ordered to that department; and General Lincoln, who possessed, in a high degree, the confidence of the New England militia, was directed to raise and command them. General Arnold, so often distinguished for his gallantry in the field, was ordered to the northern army, in the hope that his presence and reputation might reanimate the troops; and Colonel Morgan, with his corps of riflemen, was detached on the same service. Through the present dark gloom, Washington discerned a ray of light, and already cherished the hope that much good might result from present evil. "The evacuation of Ticonderoga and Mount Independence," said he in a letter of the 15th of July, to General Schuyler, "is an event of chagrin and surprise, not apprehended, nor within the compass of my reasoning. This stroke is severe indeed, and has distressed us much. But, notwithstanding, things at present wear a dark and gloomy aspect, I hope a spirited opposition will check the progress of General Burgoyne's arms, and that the confidence derived from success will hurry him into measures that will, in their consequences, be favourable to us. We should never despair. Our situation has before been unpromising, and has changed for the better. So, I trust, it will again. If new difficulties arise, we must only put forth new exertions, and proportion our efforts to the exigency of the times."

On hearing about the troubled state of the remaining army, General Washington worked hard to address its losses and provide reinforcement. A tremendous effort was made to gather tents; artillery and ammunition were sent from Massachusetts; the remaining troops from that state were assigned to this effort; and General Lincoln, who had the strong trust of the New England militia, was tasked with raising and leading them. General Arnold, known for his bravery in battle, was assigned to the northern army, hoping that his presence and reputation would motivate the troops; Colonel Morgan, with his group of riflemen, was also sent on the same mission. In the midst of the current darkness, Washington saw a glimmer of hope and already believed that good might come from this challenging situation. "The evacuation of Ticonderoga and Mount Independence," he wrote in a letter on July 15 to General Schuyler, "is an event of disappointment and surprise, unexpected and beyond my reasoning. This hit is indeed severe and has troubled us greatly. However, even though things seem dark and gloomy right now, I hope that a determined opposition will slow down General Burgoyne's advance, and that the confidence gained from success will push him into decisions that will ultimately benefit us. We should never lose hope. Our circumstances have previously seemed desperate, yet improved. I believe it will happen again. If new challenges arise, we just need to make new efforts and adjust our actions to meet the demands of the times."

On receiving a letter from General Schuyler of the seventeenth, stating the divided situation of the British army, he seemed to anticipate the event which afterwards occurred, and to suggest the measure in which originated that torrent of misfortune with which Burgoyne was overwhelmed. "Though our affairs," he said in reply to this information, "have for some days past worn a dark and gloomy aspect, I yet look forward to a fortunate and happy change. I trust General Burgoyne's army will meet, sooner or later, an effectual check; and, as I suggested before, that the success he has met with will precipitate his ruin. From your accounts, he appears to be pursuing that line of conduct which, of all others, is most favourable to us. I mean acting in detachment. This conduct will certainly give room for enterprise on our part, and expose his parties to great hazard. Could we be so happy as to cut one of them off, though it should not exceed four, five, or six hundred men, it would inspirit the people, and do away much of their present anxiety. In such an event, they would lose sight of past misfortunes; and, urged at the same time by a regard for their own security, would fly to arms, and afford every aid in their power."

Upon receiving a letter from General Schuyler on the seventeenth, detailing the divided situation of the British army, he seemed to foresee the event that later took place and to propose the action that led to the wave of misfortune that overwhelmed Burgoyne. "Although our situation," he replied to this information, "has looked dark and gloomy for the past few days, I still look forward to a fortunate and positive change. I believe General Burgoyne's army will eventually face a significant setback, and, as I mentioned before, his recent successes will ultimately lead to his downfall. From what you’ve described, he seems to be following a course of action that is most advantageous for us: acting in smaller, detached units. This approach will definitely create opportunities for us and put his groups at great risk. If we could manage to take out one of them, even if it’s just four, five, or six hundred men, it would boost the morale of the people and alleviate much of their current worry. In such a scenario, they would forget past misfortunes and, motivated by their own safety, would rally to arms and provide all the support they can."

After allowing a short repose to his army, General Burgoyne proceeded with ardour to the remaining objects of the campaign. The toils and delays which must be encountered in reaching the Hudson were soon perceived. He found it necessary to open Wood creek, and to repair the roads and bridges which Schuyler had broken up. Such was the unavoidable delay of this difficult operation, that the army did not arrive on the Hudson, in the neighbourhood of fort Edward, till the fourteenth of July. At this place it was necessary again to halt, in order to bring artillery, provisions, batteaux, and other articles from fort George.

After giving his army a short break, General Burgoyne eagerly moved on to the remaining goals of the campaign. He quickly realized the challenges and delays that would come with reaching the Hudson. He found it essential to clear Wood Creek and fix the roads and bridges that Schuyler had destroyed. The unavoidable delays from this tough task meant the army didn't arrive at the Hudson near Fort Edward until July 14th. Here, it was necessary to pause again to bring in artillery, supplies, boats, and other items from Fort George.

Burgoyne approaches Fort Edward and Schuyler retires to Saratoga.
From thence to Stillwater.

The time afforded by this delay had been employed by Schuyler to the utmost advantage. Some reinforcements of continental troops had arrived from Peekskill, and the militia had been assembled; but his strength did not yet afford a reasonable prospect of success in a contest with the enemy opposed to him. On this account, as Burgoyne approached fort Edward, Schuyler retired over the Hudson to Saratoga, and soon afterwards to Stillwater, not far from the mouth of the Mohawk. At this place, General Lincoln, who had been detached to take command of the militia assembling at Manchester, was ordered to rejoin him, and he fortified his camp in the hope of being strong enough to defend it.

The time gained from this delay was used by Schuyler to its full advantage. Some reinforcements of Continental troops had arrived from Peekskill, and the militia had come together; however, his strength still did not give a reasonable chance of winning against the enemy he faced. For this reason, as Burgoyne moved toward Fort Edward, Schuyler retreated over the Hudson to Saratoga, and soon after to Stillwater, not far from the mouth of the Mohawk. At this location, General Lincoln, who had been sent to lead the militia gathering at Manchester, was ordered to rejoin him, and he fortified his camp in the hope of being strong enough to defend it.

August 15

At Stillwater, information was obtained that Burgoyne had evacuated Castletown; so that the only communication with Ticonderoga, whence nearly all his supplies were drawn, was through Lake George; and that the garrison of that important place had been reduced to three hundred men. In consequence of this intelligence, the orders to General Lincoln were countermanded, and he was directed with the militia of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and of the Grants, making, as was understood, a total of between two and three thousand men, to place himself in the rear of the British army, and cut off its communication with the lakes. Here too he was informed that Colonel St. Leger, with a large body of Indians, in addition to his regulars, had penetrated from Oswego, by the way of the Oneida lake and Wood creek, to the Mohawk, where he had laid siege to fort Schuyler, and had totally defeated General Herkimer, who had raised the militia of Tryon county, in order to relieve the fort. The importance of protecting the inhabitants from the savages, and of preventing a junction between St. Leger and Burgoyne, and the consequent loss of the country on the Mohawk, determined Schuyler, weak as he was, to detach Major General Arnold with three continental regiments to raise the siege. The army was so enfeebled by this measure, that its removal to a place of greater security became necessary, and it was withdrawn to some islands in the confluence of the Hudson and the Mohawk, where the camp was deemed more defensible. Burgoyne had now marched down the east side of the Hudson, and his advanced parties had crossed the river, and occupied the ground at Saratoga.

At Stillwater, it was learned that Burgoyne had evacuated Castletown; thus, the only link to Ticonderoga, where nearly all his supplies were sourced, was through Lake George, and the garrison of that key location had been reduced to three hundred men. Due to this information, the orders to General Lincoln were canceled, and he was instructed, along with the militias from Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and the Grants, totaling about two to three thousand men, to position himself behind the British army and cut off its communication with the lakes. He was also informed that Colonel St. Leger, with a large group of Indians in addition to his regular troops, had advanced from Oswego, via Oneida Lake and Wood Creek, to the Mohawk, where he had besieged Fort Schuyler and had completely defeated General Herkimer, who had gathered the militia of Tryon County to relieve the fort. The need to protect the residents from the savages and to prevent a connection between St. Leger and Burgoyne, which would result in losing the Mohawk territory, prompted Schuyler, despite being weak, to send Major General Arnold with three Continental regiments to lift the siege. This decision weakened the army so much that it was necessary to relocate to a more secure location, and it was moved to some islands at the confluence of the Hudson and Mohawk rivers, where the camp was considered more defensible. Burgoyne had now advanced down the east side of the Hudson, and his forward units had crossed the river and taken position at Saratoga.

St. Leger invests Fort Schuyler.

On the 3d of August, after a message vaunting of his strength, and demanding a surrender, which was answered by a declaration that the fort would be defended to the last extremity, St. Leger invested fort Schuyler. The garrison amounted to six hundred men, all continental troops, who were commanded by Colonel Gansevoort. The besieging army rather exceeded fifteen hundred, of whom from six to nine hundred were Indians.

On August 3rd, after sending a message bragging about his strength and demanding a surrender, which was met with a statement that the fort would be defended to the very end, St. Leger laid siege to Fort Schuyler. The garrison consisted of six hundred men, all Continental soldiers, led by Colonel Gansevoort. The besieging army numbered more than fifteen hundred, with between six to nine hundred being Native Americans.

On the approach of the enemy, General Herkimer, who commanded the militia of Tryon county, assembled them in considerable numbers, and gave information to the garrison, about eleven in the morning of the sixth, of his intention to force a passage that day through the besieging army. Gansevoort determined to favour the execution of this design by a vigorous sortie; and upwards of two hundred men, to be commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Willet, were drawn out for that purpose.

On the arrival of the enemy, General Herkimer, who led the militia of Tryon County, gathered them in large numbers and informed the garrison around eleven in the morning on the sixth of his plan to break through the besieging army that day. Gansevoort decided to support this plan with a strong sortie, and over two hundred men, to be led by Lieutenant Colonel Willet, were assembled for that purpose.

Herkimer, advancing to the relief of the fort, falls into an ambuscade, and is defeated with loss.

Unfortunately St. Leger received information the preceding day of Herkimer's approach, and, early in the morning, placed a strong party, composed of regulars and Indians, in ambuscade on the road along which he was to march. His first notice of it was given by a heavy discharge of small arms, which was followed by a furious attack from the Indians with their tomahawks. He defended himself with resolution; but was defeated with great slaughter. The general and several of the field officers were wounded; and many others, among whom were several persons of distinction, were killed or taken prisoners. The loss was estimated at four hundred men. The destruction was prevented from being still more complete, by the very timely sortie made by Lieutenant Colonel Willet, which checked the pursuit, and recalled those engaged in it to the defence of their own camp.

Unfortunately, St. Leger received word the day before about Herkimer's approach, and early in the morning, he set up a strong group of regulars and Indians in ambush on the road that he was supposed to take. His first warning came from a sudden volley of gunfire, followed by a fierce attack from the Indians with their tomahawks. He fought back fiercely, but was ultimately defeated with heavy losses. The general and several field officers were injured, and many others, including some notable individuals, were killed or captured. The total loss was estimated at four hundred men. The damage was prevented from being even worse by the timely counterattack led by Lieutenant Colonel Willet, which halted the pursuit and brought those pursuing back to defend their own camp.

As soon as Gansevoort understood that Herkimer was advancing, the sortie which he had planned was made. Lieutenant Colonel Willet fell on the camp of the besiegers, and routed them at the first onset. After driving them, some into the woods, and others over the river, he returned to the fort without the loss of a man.

As soon as Gansevoort realized that Herkimer was approaching, he executed the planned surprise attack. Lieutenant Colonel Willet charged into the besiegers' camp and defeated them right away. After pushing some into the woods and others across the river, he returned to the fort without losing a single man.

Burgoyne had received early intimation of the arrival of St. Leger before fort Schuyler; and was aware of the advantage to be derived from an immediate and rapid movement down the Hudson. But the obstacles to his progress multiplied daily, and each step produced new embarrassments. Not more than one-third of the horses expected from Canada had arrived; and Schuyler had been active in removing the draft cattle of the country. With unremitting exertion, he had been able to transport from fort George to the Hudson, a distance of eighteen miles, only twelve batteaux, and provisions for four days in advance. The defectiveness of his means to feed his army until it should reach the abundant country below him, presented an impediment to his farther progress, not readily to be surmounted. The difficulty of drawing supplies from fort George would increase every day with the increasing distance; and the communications, already endangered by a considerable body of militia assembling at White Creek, could be secured only by larger detachments from his army than he was in a condition to make. These were strong inducements to attempt some other mode of supply.

Burgoyne had received early notice of St. Leger's arrival before Fort Schuyler and understood the benefits of making a quick move down the Hudson. However, the obstacles to his progress increased daily, and every step forward brought new difficulties. Only about one-third of the horses expected from Canada had arrived, and Schuyler had been active in removing the draft animals from the area. Despite his relentless efforts, he had managed to transport only twelve batteaux and provisions for four days from Fort George to the Hudson, a distance of eighteen miles. The inadequacy of his resources to feed his army until they reached the abundant territory below posed a significant hurdle to his further progress, which was not easy to overcome. The challenge of obtaining supplies from Fort George would grow every day as the distance increased, and the communications, already threatened by a significant group of militia gathering at White Creek, could only be secured by sending out larger detachments from his army than he could afford to spare. These factors strongly encouraged him to seek alternative means of supply.

Colonel Baum is detached to seize the magazines at Bennington.

It was well known that large magazines of provisions for the use of the American army were collected at Bennington, which place was generally guarded by militia, whose numbers varied from day to day. The possession of these magazines would enable him to prosecute his ulterior plans without relying for supplies from Lake George; and he determined to seize them.

It was widely understood that large stores of supplies for the American army were gathered at Bennington, a location that was usually protected by militia, whose numbers fluctuated daily. Gaining control of these supplies would allow him to carry out his further plans without depending on resources from Lake George; and he decided to take them.

To try the affections of the country, to complete a corps of loyalists, and to mount Reidisel's dragoons, were subordinate objects of the expedition.[79] Lieutenant Colonel Baum with five hundred Europeans, and a body of American loyalists, was detached on this service.

To test the feelings of the country, to strengthen a group of loyalists, and to deploy Reidisel's dragoons were secondary goals of the mission.[79] Lieutenant Colonel Baum, along with five hundred Europeans and a group of American loyalists, was assigned to this task.

To facilitate the enterprise, and be ready to take advantage of its success, Burgoyne moved down the east side of the Hudson, and threw a bridge of rafts over that river for the passage of his van, which took post at Saratoga. At the same time Lieutenant Colonel Brechman, with his corps, was advanced to Batten Hill, in order, if necessary, to support Colonel Baum.[80]

To make the venture easier and be poised to capitalize on its success, Burgoyne moved down the east side of the Hudson and constructed a bridge of rafts over the river for the passage of his troops, who took position at Saratoga. Meanwhile, Lieutenant Colonel Brechman and his unit advanced to Batten Hill to potentially support Colonel Baum.[80]

On approaching Bennington, Baum discovered that he should have to encounter a much more considerable force than had been suspected. The New Hampshire militia, commanded by General Starke, had reached that place on their way to camp; and, uniting with Colonel Warner, made in the whole about two thousand men.

On arriving in Bennington, Baum realized that he would face a much larger force than expected. The New Hampshire militia, led by General Starke, had arrived there on their way to camp; and, joining with Colonel Warner, totaled around two thousand men.

Perceiving his danger, Baum halted about four miles from Bennington, and despatched an express for a reinforcement. In the mean time, he strengthened his position by intrenchments.

Realizing his danger, Baum stopped about four miles from Bennington and sent a messenger for reinforcements. In the meantime, he fortified his position with trenches.

Lieutenant Colonel Brechman was immediately ordered to his assistance; but, such was the state of the roads that, though the distance was only twenty-four miles, and his march was pressed unremittingly from eight in the morning of the 15th, he did not reach the ground on which Baum had encamped, until four in the afternoon of the next day.[81]

Lieutenant Colonel Brechman was quickly ordered to help; however, because of the condition of the roads, even though the distance was only twenty-four miles and he started his march at eight in the morning on the 15th, he didn’t arrive at the spot where Baum had set up camp until four in the afternoon of the next day.[81]

Is attacked in his intrenchments by General Starke, and entirely routed.

In the mean time, General Starke determined to attack him in his intrenchments. So confident were the provincials belonging to this party, of the attachment of the country to the royal cause, that the American troops, while making their dispositions for the attack, were mistaken for armed friends coming to join them. On discovering his error, Baum prepared for the contest, and made a gallant defence. His works however were carried by storm, and great part of his detachment killed, or taken prisoners. A few escaped into the woods, and saved themselves by flight.

In the meantime, General Starke decided to launch an attack on him in his fortifications. The provincial troops on this side were so confident in the loyalty of the country to the royal cause that they mistakenly thought the American soldiers, while preparing for the assault, were allies coming to join them. Once he realized his mistake, Baum got ready for the fight and put up a brave defense. However, his positions were overwhelmed, and a large portion of his troops were killed or captured. A few managed to escape into the woods and saved themselves by fleeing.

Brechman advances to Baum's aid, is attacked by Colonel Warner, and defeated.

Brechman arrived during the pursuit, and obtained from the fugitives, the first intelligence of the disaster which had befallen them. He immediately attacked the parties of militia who were engaged in the pursuit, and gained some advantage over them. Fortunately for the Americans, Colonel Warner[82] came up at this critical juncture with his continental regiment, and restored, and continued the action, until the main body of the militia re-assembled, and came to support him. Brechman in turn was compelled to retire; but he maintained the engagement until dark, when, abandoning his artillery and baggage, he saved his party under cover of the night.

Brechman arrived during the chase and got the first news from the fugitives about the disaster that had happened to them. He immediately attacked the militia groups that were in pursuit and gained some ground against them. Luckily for the Americans, Colonel Warner[82] showed up at this critical moment with his continental regiment, helping to restore and continue the fight until the main group of militia reassembled and came to support him. Brechman was then forced to pull back; however, he kept up the engagement until dark, when he abandoned his artillery and baggage and managed to save his troops under the cover of night.

One thousand stand of arms, and nine hundred swords were taken in this battle. General Burgoyne represented his loss in men at about four hundred; but thirty-two officers, and five hundred and sixty-four privates, including Canadians and loyalists, were made prisoners. The number of the dead was not ascertained, because the action with Brechman had been fought in the woods, and been continued for several miles.

One thousand weapons and nine hundred swords were captured in this battle. General Burgoyne estimated his losses at around four hundred men; however, thirty-two officers and five hundred sixty-four privates, including Canadians and loyalists, were taken prisoner. The exact number of the dead was not determined because the fight with Brechman took place in the woods and continued for several miles.

The British general therefore must have included in his estimate of loss, only his European troops.

The British general must have only considered his European troops in his assessment of losses.

This important success was soon followed by another of equal influence on the fate of the campaign.

This significant success was quickly followed by another that had an equal impact on the outcome of the campaign.

Fort Schuyler had been fortified with more skill, and was defended with more courage, than St. Leger had expected. His artillery made no impression on its walls; and his Indians, who were much better pleased with obtaining plunder and scalps, than besieging fortresses, became intractable, and manifested great disgust with the service. In this temper, they understood that Arnold was advancing with a large body of continental troops; and, soon afterwards were told that Burgoyne and his army had been totally defeated; a report probably founded on the affair at Bennington. Unwilling to share the misfortune of their friends, they manifested a determination not to await the arrival of Arnold. The efforts of St. Leger to detain them being ineffectual, many of them decamped immediately, and the rest threatened to follow.

Fort Schuyler was better fortified and defended with more bravery than St. Leger had anticipated. His artillery had no effect on its walls, and his Native American allies, who preferred looting and collecting scalps over laying siege to forts, became unruly and showed significant displeasure with the situation. In this mood, they learned that Arnold was approaching with a large group of Continental troops; soon after, they were informed that Burgoyne and his army had been completely defeated, likely based on the events at Bennington. Not wanting to share in the misfortune of their allies, they resolved not to wait for Arnold's arrival. St. Leger’s attempts to keep them in line were futile, and many of them left immediately, with the rest threatening to follow suit.

St. Leger abandons the siege of Fort Schuyler, and retreats to Ticonderoga.

The time for deliberation was past. The camp was broken up with indications of excessive alarm. The tents were left standing; and the artillery, with great part of the baggage, ammunition, and provisions, fell into the hands of the Americans. The retreating army was pursued by a detachment from the garrison; and it was stated by deserters, that the Indians plundered the remaining baggage of the officers, and massacred such soldiers as could not keep up with the line of march. St. Leger returned to Montreal, whence he proceeded to Ticonderoga, with the intention of joining General Burgoyne by that route.

The time for discussion was over. The camp was packed up in a panic. The tents were left standing, and a large part of the artillery, along with baggage, ammunition, and supplies, fell into the hands of the Americans. A group from the garrison pursued the retreating army, and deserters reported that the Indians looted the remaining baggage of the officers and killed any soldiers who couldn’t keep up with the march. St. Leger went back to Montreal, from where he headed to Ticonderoga, planning to join General Burgoyne that way.

The decisive victory at Bennington, and the retreat of St. Leger from fort Schuyler, however important in themselves, were still more so in their consequences. An army, which had spread terror and dismay in every direction, which had, previously, experienced no reverse of fortune, was considered as already beaten; and the opinion became common, that the appearance of the great body of the people in arms, would secure the emancipation of their country. It was too an advantage of no inconsiderable importance resulting from this change of public opinion, that the disaffected became timid, and the wavering who, had the torrent of success continued, would have made a merit of contributing their aid to the victor, were no longer disposed to put themselves and their fortunes in hazard, to support an army whose fate was so uncertain.

The decisive victory at Bennington and the retreat of St. Leger from Fort Schuyler, while significant on their own, were even more impactful in terms of their consequences. An army that had spread fear and panic everywhere and had faced no defeats until then was seen as already defeated, leading to a common belief that the presence of a large number of armed citizens would secure the liberation of their country. Additionally, it was a major advantage that this shift in public opinion made the disenchanted crowd more cautious, and those who were undecided—who, had success continued, would have been eager to lend their support to the winning side—were now unwilling to risk their fortunes supporting an army with such an uncertain future.

The barbarities which had been perpetrated by the Indians belonging to the invading armies, excited still more resentment than terror. As the prospect of revenge began to open, their effect became the more apparent; and their influence on the royal cause was the more sensibly felt because they had been indiscriminate.

The brutal acts committed by the Indians from the invading armies stirred up even more anger than fear. As the chance for revenge started to become clear, their impact became more obvious, and their effect on the royal cause was more strongly felt because they targeted anyone and everyone.

The murder of Miss M'Crea.

The murder of Miss M'Crea passed through all the papers of the continent: and the story, being retouched by the hand of more than one master, excited a peculiar degree of sensibility.[83] But there were other causes of still greater influence in producing the events which afterwards took place. The last reinforcements of continental troops arrived in camp about this time, and added both courage and strength to the army. The harvest, which had detained the northern militia upon their farms, was over; and General Schuyler, whose continued and eminent services had not exempted him from the imputation of being a traitor, was succeeded by General Gates, who possessed a large share of the public confidence.

The murder of Miss M'Crea made headlines across the country, and the story, polished by several skilled writers, stirred a strong emotional response.[83] But there were other factors that had an even bigger impact on the events that followed. The final group of continental troops arrived at the camp around this time, boosting both the army's courage and strength. The harvest season, which had kept the northern militia busy on their farms, was completed; and General Schuyler, whose ongoing and significant contributions didn’t spare him from being accused of treason, was replaced by General Gates, who had gained a great deal of public trust.

General Gates takes command of the Northern Army.

When Schuyler was directed by congress to resume the command of the northern department, Gates withdrew himself from it. When the resolution passed recalling the general officers who had served in that department, General Washington was requested to name a successor to Schuyler. On his expressing a wish to decline this nomination, and representing the inconvenience of removing all the general officers, Gates was again directed to repair thither and take the command, and their resolution to recall the brigadiers was suspended until the Commander-in-chief should be of opinion that it might be carried into effect with safety.

When Congress ordered Schuyler to take back command of the northern department, Gates stepped aside. After the decision was made to recall the general officers who had been serving there, General Washington was asked to recommend someone to succeed Schuyler. When he indicated that he preferred to decline this nomination and pointed out the challenges of moving all the general officers, Gates was once again instructed to go there and take command. Their decision to recall the brigadiers was put on hold until the Commander-in-chief believed it could be safely implemented.

Schuyler retained the command until the arrival of Gates, which was on the 19th of August, and continued his exertions to restore the affairs of the department, though he felt acutely the disgrace of being recalled in this critical and interesting state of the campaign. "It is," said he, in a letter to the Commander-in-chief, "matter of extreme chagrin to me to be deprived of the command at a time when, soon if ever, we shall probably be enabled to face the enemy; when we are on the point of taking ground[84] where they must attack to a disadvantage, should our force be inadequate to facing them in the field; when an opportunity will, in all probability, occur, in which I might evince that I am not what congress have too plainly insinuated by taking the command from me."

Schuyler kept the command until Gates arrived on August 19th and continued working hard to fix the department's issues, even though he felt the humiliation of being recalled at such a crucial and exciting point in the campaign. "It is," he wrote in a letter to the Commander-in-chief, "extremely upsetting for me to lose command at a time when, soon if ever, we’ll likely be able to confront the enemy; when we are about to take ground[84] where they will have to attack at a disadvantage if our force isn’t enough to face them in the field; when an opportunity will probably arise for me to show that I am not what Congress has too clearly suggested by taking command away from me."

If error be attributable to the evacuation of Ticonderoga, no portion of it was committed by Schuyler. His removal from the command was probably severe and unjust as respected himself; but perhaps wise as respected America. The frontier towards the lakes was to be defended by the troops of New England; and, however unfounded their prejudices against him might be, it was prudent to consult them.

If any blame falls on the evacuation of Ticonderoga, Schuyler isn’t responsible for it. His removal from command was likely harsh and unfair to him personally, but it might have been a smart move for America. The troops from New England were supposed to defend the area by the lakes, and even if their prejudices against him were unfounded, it was wise to take their feelings into account.

Notwithstanding the difficulties which multiplied around him, Burgoyne remained steady to his purpose. The disasters at Bennington and on the Mohawk produced no disposition to abandon the enterprise and save his army.

Notwithstanding the difficulties that piled up around him, Burgoyne stayed committed to his goal. The disasters at Bennington and on the Mohawk didn’t make him want to give up the mission and save his army.

September 14.
Burgoyne encamps on the heights of Saratoga.

It had now become necessary to recur to the slow and toilsome mode of obtaining supplies from fort George. Having, with persevering labour, collected provision for thirty days in advance, he crossed the Hudson on the 13th and 14th of September, and encamped on the heights and plains of Saratoga, with a determination to decide the fate of the expedition in a general engagement.

It was now necessary to go back to the slow and difficult process of getting supplies from Fort George. After tirelessly gathering enough food for thirty days ahead, he crossed the Hudson on September 13th and 14th and set up camp on the heights and plains of Saratoga, determined to settle the outcome of the expedition in a major battle.

General Gates, having been joined by all the continental troops destined for the northern department, and reinforced by large bodies of militia, had moved from his camp in the islands, and advanced to the neighbourhood of Stillwater.

General Gates, joined by all the Continental troops assigned to the northern department and bolstered by large groups of militia, had moved from his camp on the islands and advanced to the area near Stillwater.

He attacks Gates at Stillwater.
September 19.

The bridges between the two armies having been broken down, the roads being excessively bad, and the country covered with wood, the progress of the British army down the river was slow. On the night of the 17th, Burgoyne encamped within four miles of the American army, and the next day was employed in repairing the bridges between the two camps.[85] In the morning of the 19th he advanced in full force towards the American left. Morgan was immediately detached with his corps to observe the enemy, and to harass his front and flanks. He fell in with a picket in front of the right wing, which he attacked with vivacity, and drove in upon the main body. Pursuing with too much ardour, he was met in considerable force, and, after a severe encounter, was compelled, in turn, to retire in some disorder. Two regiments being advanced to his assistance, his corps was rallied, and the action became more general. The Americans were formed in a wood, with an open field in front, and invariably repulsed the British corps which attacked them; but when they pursued those corps to the main body, they were in turn driven back to their first ground. Reinforcements were continually brought up, and about four in the afternoon, upwards of three thousand American troops[86] were closely engaged with the whole right wing of the British army commanded by General Burgoyne in person. The conflict was extremely severe, and only terminated with the day. At dark, the Americans retired to their camp, and the British, who had found great difficulty in maintaining their ground, lay all night on their arms near the field of battle.

The bridges between the two armies were destroyed, the roads were in terrible condition, and the area was heavily forested, making the British army's movement downriver slow. On the night of the 17th, Burgoyne set up camp just four miles from the American army, spending the next day fixing the bridges between the two camps.[85] On the morning of the 19th, he moved forward with full force toward the American left. Morgan was quickly sent out with his unit to keep an eye on the enemy and to disrupt their front and sides. He encountered a picket in front of the right wing, attacked it vigorously, and pushed it back toward the main body. However, in his eagerness to pursue, he ran into a significant force and, after a tough fight, had to retreat in a bit of chaos. With two regiments sent in to help, his corps regrouped, and the battle escalated. The Americans positioned themselves in a wooded area, with an open field in front, consistently pushing back the British forces that attacked them. But when the Americans chased those forces back towards their main body, they were also driven back to their original position. Reinforcements kept arriving, and by around four in the afternoon, over three thousand American troops[86] were heavily engaged with the entire right wing of the British army, led by General Burgoyne himself. The fighting was intense and only ended when night fell. As darkness set in, the Americans withdrew to their camp, while the British, who struggled to hold their ground, stayed on alert near the battlefield all night.

In this action the killed and wounded on the part of the Americans were between three and four hundred. Among the former were Colonels Coburn and Adams, and several other valuable officers. The British loss has been estimated at rather more than five hundred men.

In this battle, the number of American soldiers killed and wounded was between three and four hundred. Among those killed were Colonels Coburn and Adams, along with several other important officers. The British losses are estimated to be just over five hundred men.

Each army claimed the victory; and each believed itself to have beaten near the whole of the hostile army with only a part of its own force. The advantage, however, taking all circumstances into consideration, was decidedly with the Americans. In a conflict which nearly consumed the day, they found themselves at least equal to their antagonists. In every quarter they had acted on the offensive; and, after an encounter for several hours, had not lost an inch of ground. They had not been driven from the field, but had retired from it at the close of day, to the camp from which they had marched to battle. Their object, which was to check the advancing enemy, had been obtained; while that of the British general had failed. In the actual state of things, to fight without being beaten was, on their part, victory; while, on the part of the British, to fight without a decisive victory, was defeat. The Indians, who found themselves beaten in the woods by Morgan, and restrained from scalping and plundering the unarmed by Burgoyne, who saw before them the prospect of hard fighting without profit, grew tired of the service, and deserted in great numbers. The Canadians and Provincials were not much more faithful; and Burgoyne soon perceived that his hopes must rest almost entirely on his European troops.

Each army claimed victory; each believed it had defeated nearly the entire opposing force with only a part of its own troops. However, considering all factors, the advantage clearly lay with the Americans. In a conflict that almost lasted all day, they found themselves at least equal to their opponents. They had taken the initiative everywhere and, after several hours of fighting, had not lost any ground. They were not driven off the field, but had left at the end of the day to return to the camp from which they had marched to battle. Their goal, which was to stop the advancing enemy, was achieved, while the British general's objective failed. Given the circumstances, not being beaten in battle was a victory for the Americans, while the British, by not achieving a decisive win, faced defeat. The Indians, who had been defeated in the woods by Morgan and were prevented from scalping and looting the unarmed by Burgoyne, who faced hard fighting without reward, grew weary of the effort and deserted in large numbers. The Canadians and Provincials were not much more reliable, and Burgoyne quickly realized that his hopes had to rest almost entirely on his European troops.

With reason, therefore, this action was celebrated throughout the United States as a victory, and considered as the precursor of the total ruin of the invading army. The utmost exultation was displayed, and the militia were stimulated to fly to arms, and complete the work so happily begun.

With good reason, this action was celebrated across the United States as a victory and seen as the beginning of the complete destruction of the invading army. There was a great display of excitement, and the militia were encouraged to take up arms and finish the work so successfully started.

General Lincoln, in conformity with directions which have been stated, had assembled a considerable body of New England militia in the rear of Burgoyne, from which he drew three parties of about five hundred men each. One of these was detached under the command of Colonel Brown, to the north end of Lake George, principally to relieve a number of prisoners who were confined there, but with orders to push his success, should he be fortunate, as far as prudence would admit. Colonel Johnson, at the head of another party, marched towards Mount Independence, and Colonel Woodbury, with a third, was detached to Skeensborough to cover the retreat of both the others. With the residue, Lincoln proceeded to the camp of Gates.

General Lincoln, following the instructions he had received, gathered a large group of New England militia behind Burgoyne. From this group, he formed three parties of about five hundred men each. One of these was sent north under Colonel Brown to Lake George, mainly to free some prisoners held there, but he was also ordered to push his advantage as much as possible without taking unnecessary risks. Colonel Johnson led another group towards Mount Independence, while Colonel Woodbury took a third group to Skeensborough to provide cover for both of the others. With the remaining forces, Lincoln made his way to Gates' camp.

Colonel Brown, after marching all night, arrived, at the break of day, on the north end of the lake, where he found a small post which he carried without opposition. The surprise was complete; and he took possession of Mount Defiance, Mount Hope, the landing place, and about two hundred batteaux. With the loss of only three killed and five wounded, he liberated one hundred American prisoners, and captured two hundred and ninety-three of the enemy. This success was joyfully proclaimed through the northern states. It was believed confidently that Ticonderoga and Mount Independence were recovered; and the militia were exhorted, by joining their brethren in the army, to insure that event if it had not already happened.

Colonel Brown, after marching all night, arrived at the north end of the lake at dawn, where he found a small outpost that he took without any resistance. The surprise was complete; he seized Mount Defiance, Mount Hope, the landing area, and about two hundred bateaux. With only three killed and five wounded, he freed one hundred American prisoners and captured two hundred and ninety-three enemy soldiers. This victory was joyfully announced throughout the northern states. It was confidently believed that Ticonderoga and Mount Independence had been reclaimed, and the militia were encouraged to join their fellow soldiers in the army to ensure that outcome if it hadn't already occurred.

The attempt on those places however failed. The garrison repulsed the assailants; who, after a few days, abandoned the siege. On their return through Lake George in the vessels they had captured, the militia made an attack on Diamond Island, the depot of all the stores collected at the north end of the lake. Being again repulsed, they destroyed the vessels they had taken, and returned to their former station.[87]

The attempt on those locations, however, failed. The garrison pushed back the attackers, who, after a few days, gave up the siege. On their way back through Lake George in the ships they had captured, the militia launched an attack on Diamond Island, where all the supplies collected at the north end of the lake were stored. After being repelled again, they destroyed the ships they had taken and returned to their previous position.[87]

September 21.

The day after the battle of Stillwater, General Burgoyne took a position almost within cannon shot of the American camp, fortified his right, and extended his left to the river. Directly after taking this ground he received a letter from Sir Henry Clinton, informing him that he should attack fort Montgomery about the 20th of September. The messenger returned with information that Burgoyne was in extreme difficulty, and would endeavour to wait for aid until the 12th of October.[88]

The day after the battle of Stillwater, General Burgoyne positioned himself almost within cannon range of the American camp, strengthened his right flank, and stretched his left towards the river. Right after setting up there, he got a letter from Sir Henry Clinton, telling him that he should attack Fort Montgomery around September 20th. The messenger came back with news that Burgoyne was in serious trouble and would try to hang on for help until October 12th.[88]

Both armies retained their position until the 7th of October. Burgoyne, in the hope of being relieved by Sir Henry Clinton; and Gates, in the confidence of growing stronger every day.

Both armies held their ground until October 7th. Burgoyne hoped to be rescued by Sir Henry Clinton, while Gates felt confident that he was getting stronger every day.

October 7.

Having received no farther intelligence from Sir Henry, and being reduced to the necessity of diminishing the ration issued to his soldiers, the British general determined to make one more trial of strength with his adversary. In execution of this determination, he drew out on his right fifteen hundred choice troops, whom he commanded in person, assisted by Generals Philips, Reidisel, and Frazer.

Having received no further updates from Sir Henry and having to cut back on the rations given to his soldiers, the British general decided to make one more attempt to confront his enemy. To carry out this plan, he assembled fifteen hundred elite troops on his right, which he commanded directly, with the support of Generals Philips, Reidisel, and Frazer.

The right wing was formed within three-quarters of a mile of the left of the American camp; and a corps of rangers, Indians, and provincials, was pushed on through secret paths, to show themselves in its rear, and excite alarm in that quarter.[89]

The right wing was set up about three-quarters of a mile to the left of the American camp, and a group of rangers, Native Americans, and local troops was sent through hidden trails to appear in its rear and create a sense of panic in that area.[89]

These movements were perceived by General Gates, who determined to attack their left, and, at the same time, to fall on their right flank. Poor's brigade, and some regiments from New Hampshire, were ordered to meet them in front; while Morgan with his rifle corps made a circuit unperceived, and seized a very advantageous height covered with wood on their right. As soon as it was supposed that Morgan had gained the ground he intended to occupy, the attack was made in front and on the left, in great force. At this critical moment Morgan poured in a deadly and incessant fire on the front and right flank.

These movements were noticed by General Gates, who decided to attack their left while also striking their right flank. Poor's brigade and some regiments from New Hampshire were ordered to confront them directly; meanwhile, Morgan and his rifle corps made an unnoticed detour and took a highly advantageous wooded height on their right. Once it was believed that Morgan had secured the position he aimed for, the main attack was launched from the front and the left with significant force. At this crucial moment, Morgan unleashed a relentless and deadly fire on the front and right flank.

While the British right wing was thus closely pressed in front, and on its flank, a distinct division of the American troops was ordered to intercept its retreat to camp, and to separate it from the residue of the army. Burgoyne perceived the danger of his situation, and ordered the light infantry under General Frazer, with part of the 24th regiment, to form a second line, in order to cover the light infantry of the right, and secure a retreat. While this movement was in progress, the left of the British right was forced from its ground, and the light infantry was ordered to its aid. In the attempt to execute this order, they were attacked by the rifle corps, with great effect; and Frazer was mortally wounded. Overpowered by numbers, and pressed on all sides by a superior weight of fire, Burgoyne, with great difficulty, and with the loss of his field pieces, and great part of his artillery corps, regained his camp. The Americans followed close in his rear; and assaulted his works throughout their whole extent. Towards the close of day, the intrenchments were forced on their right; and General Arnold, with a few men, actually entered their works; but his horse being killed under him, and himself wounded, the troops were forced out of them; and it being nearly dark, they desisted from the assault. The left of Arnold's division was still more successful. Jackson's regiment of Massachusetts, then led by Lieutenant Colonel Brooks, turned the right of the encampment, and stormed the works occupied by the German reserve. Lieutenant Colonel Brechman who commanded in them was killed, and the works were carried. The orders given by Burgoyne to recover them were not executed; and Brooks maintained the ground he had gained.

While the British right wing was under heavy pressure in front and on its side, a distinct group of American troops was ordered to cut off their retreat to camp and separate them from the rest of the army. Burgoyne recognized the danger of his situation and ordered the light infantry under General Frazer, along with part of the 24th regiment, to form a second line to protect the light infantry on the right and secure a retreat. While this movement was happening, the left side of the British right was forced off its ground, and the light infantry was sent to help. In trying to carry out this order, they were attacked by the rifle corps, with significant effect; and Frazer was mortally wounded. Overwhelmed by numbers and under heavy fire from all sides, Burgoyne managed, with great difficulty and the loss of his field pieces along with much of his artillery, to return to his camp. The Americans closely pursued him and assaulted his defenses along their entire length. By the end of the day, his fortifications were breached on the right; and General Arnold, with a few men, actually entered their works; but after his horse was shot underneath him and he was wounded, the troops had to withdraw; and with it nearly dark, they ceased their assault. The left side of Arnold's division was even more successful. Jackson's regiment from Massachusetts, then led by Lieutenant Colonel Brooks, flanked the right of the encampment and attacked the works held by the German reserve. Lieutenant Colonel Brechman, who was in command, was killed, and the works were taken. The orders given by Burgoyne to reclaim them were not carried out; and Brooks held the ground he had seized.

Darkness put an end to the action; and the Americans lay all night with their arms in their hands, about half a mile from the British lines, ready to renew the assault with the return of day. The advantage they had gained was decisive. They had taken several pieces of artillery, killed a great number of men, made upwards of two hundred prisoners, among whom were several officers of distinction, and had penetrated the lines in a part which exposed the whole to considerable danger.

Darkness ended the action, and the Americans spent the night with their weapons in hand, about half a mile from the British lines, ready to resume the attack at dawn. The advantage they had gained was significant. They had captured several pieces of artillery, killed many soldiers, taken over two hundred prisoners, including several notable officers, and had breached the lines in a way that put the entire position at considerable risk.

Unwilling to risk the events of the next day on the same ground, Burgoyne changed his position in the course of the night, and drew his whole army into a strong camp on the river heights, extending his right up the river. This movement extricated him from the danger of being attacked the ensuing morning by an enemy already in possession of part of his works.

Unwilling to risk the events of the next day on the same ground, Burgoyne changed his position overnight and moved his entire army to a strong camp on the river heights, stretching his right flank up the river. This maneuver got him out of the danger of being attacked the next morning by an enemy that was already holding part of his defenses.

October 8.

General Gates perceived the strength of this position, and was not disposed to hazard an assault. Aware of the critical situation of his adversary, he detached a party higher up the Hudson for the purpose of intercepting the British army on its retreat, while strong corps were posted on the other side of the river to guard its passage.

General Gates recognized the advantages of this position and wasn’t willing to risk an attack. Understanding the vulnerable state of his opponent, he sent a group up the Hudson to intercept the British army during its retreat, while strong troops were stationed on the opposite side of the river to secure its crossing.

Retreats to Saratoga.

This movement compelled Burgoyne again to change his position, and to retire to Saratoga. About nine at night the retreat was commenced, and was effected with the loss of his hospital, containing about three hundred sick, and of several batteaux laden with provision and baggage. On reaching the ground to be occupied, he found a strong corps already intrenched on the opposite side of the river, prepared to dispute its passage.

This movement forced Burgoyne to change his position again and retreat to Saratoga. Around nine at night, the retreat began, resulting in the loss of his hospital, which had around three hundred sick soldiers, along with several boats filled with supplies and baggage. Upon reaching the area he planned to occupy, he discovered a strong unit already entrenched on the opposite side of the river, ready to challenge any attempt to cross it.

October 10.

From Saratoga, Burgoyne detached a company of artificers, under a strong escort, to repair the roads and bridges towards fort Edward. Scarcely had this detachment moved, when the Americans appeared in force on the heights south of Saratoga creek, and made dispositions which excited the apprehension of a design to cross it and attack his camp. The Europeans escorting the artificers were recalled, and a provincial corps, employed in the same service, being attacked by a small party, ran away and left the workmen to shift for themselves.

From Saratoga, Burgoyne sent out a company of workers, with a strong escort, to fix the roads and bridges leading to Fort Edward. Just as this group set out, the Americans showed up in large numbers on the hills south of Saratoga Creek and made moves that raised concerns about an attempt to cross the creek and attack his camp. The European escort for the workers was pulled back, and a local group also working on the same tasks was attacked by a small party, causing them to flee and leave the workers to fend for themselves.

No hope of repairing the roads remaining, it became impossible to move the baggage and artillery.

With no hope of fixing the roads left, it became impossible to transport the baggage and artillery.

The British army was now almost completely environed by a superior force. No means remained of extricating itself from difficulties and dangers which were continually increasing, but fording a river, on the opposite bank of which a formidable body of troops was already posted; and then escaping to fort George, through roads impassable by artillery or wagons, while its rear was closely pressed by a victorious enemy.[90]

The British army was now almost entirely surrounded by a stronger force. There was no way to escape from the difficulties and dangers that were constantly growing, except by fording a river, where a large group of troops was already stationed on the other side; and then getting to Fort George through roads that couldn’t be used by artillery or wagons, all while being closely pursued by a victorious enemy.[90]

A council of general officers called to deliberate on their situation, took the bold resolution to abandon every thing but their arms and such provisions as the soldiers could carry; and, by a forced march in the night up the river, to extricate themselves from the American army; and crossing at fort Edward, or at a ford above it, to press on to fort George.

A group of senior officers met to discuss their situation and made the daring decision to leave everything behind except their weapons and whatever supplies the soldiers could carry. They planned to make a forced night march up the river to escape from the American army and then cross at Fort Edward or a nearby ford to continue on to Fort George.

Gates had foreseen this movement, and had prepared for it. In addition to placing strong guards at the fords of the Hudson, he had formed an intrenched camp on the high grounds between fort Edward and fort George. The scouts sent to examine the route returned with this information, and the plan was abandoned as impracticable.

Gates had anticipated this movement and had gotten ready for it. Besides putting strong guards at the fords of the Hudson, he had set up a fortified camp on the high ground between Fort Edward and Fort George. The scouts sent to check the route came back with this information, and the plan was dropped as unfeasible.

Nothing could be more hopeless than the condition of the British army, or more desperate than that of their general, as described by himself. In his letter to Lord George Germain, secretary of state for American affairs, he says, "A series of hard toil, incessant effort, stubborn action, until disabled in the collateral branches of the army by the total defection of the Indians; the desertion, or timidity of the Canadians and provincials, some individuals excepted; disappointed in the last hope of any co-operation from other armies; the regular troops reduced by losses from the best parts, to three thousand five hundred fighting men, not two thousand of which were British; only three days provisions, upon short allowance, in store; invested by an army of sixteen thousand men; and no appearance of retreat remaining; I called into council all the generals, field officers, and captains commanding corps, and by their unanimous concurrence and advice, I was induced to open a treaty with Major General Gates."

Nothing could be more hopeless than the state of the British army, or more desperate than that of their general, as he described himself. In his letter to Lord George Germain, secretary of state for American affairs, he writes, "After a long period of hard work, constant effort, and stubborn action, I found our army crippled by the total desertion of the Indians; the desertion or timidity of the Canadians and provincial troops, with a few exceptions; disappointment in the last hope for any support from other armies; our regular forces reduced from the best units to three thousand five hundred fighting men, fewer than two thousand of whom were British; only three days of provisions left, on short rations; surrounded by an army of sixteen thousand men; and no chance of retreat remaining; I called all the generals, field officers, and captains commanding units into a council, and with their unanimous agreement and advice, I was persuaded to start talks with Major General Gates."

A treaty was opened with a general proposition, stating the willingness of the British general to spare the further effusion of blood, provided a negotiation could be effected on honourable terms.

A treaty was introduced with a broad statement, expressing the British general's willingness to avoid further bloodshed if negotiations could be conducted on fair terms.

Surrender of the army under Burgoyne.
October 17.

This proposition was answered by a demand that the whole army should ground their arms in their encampment, and surrender themselves prisoners of war. This demand was instantly rejected, with a declaration that if General Gates designed to insist on it, the negotiation must immediately break off, and hostilities recommence. On receiving this decided answer, Gates receded from the rigorous terms at first proposed; and a convention was signed, in which it was agreed that the British army, after marching out of their encampment with all the honours of war, should lay down their arms, and not serve against the United States till exchanged. They were not to be detained in captivity, but to be permitted to embark for England.

This proposal was met with a demand that the entire army should lay down their weapons in their camp and surrender as prisoners of war. This demand was quickly rejected, with a statement that if General Gates insisted on it, negotiations would immediately end, and fighting would resume. Upon receiving this firm response, Gates softened his initial strict terms; a convention was signed that allowed the British army to march out of their camp with all the honors of war, lay down their arms, and not serve against the United States until they were exchanged. They would not be held in captivity but would be allowed to sail back to England.

The situation of the armies considered,[91] these terms were highly honourable to the British general, and favourable to his nation. They were probably more advantageous than would have been granted by General Gates, had he entertained no apprehension from Sir Henry Clinton, who was, at length, making the promised diversion on the North River, up which he had penetrated as far as Æsopus.

The situation with the armies considered,[91] these terms were very honorable for the British general and beneficial for his country. They were likely more favorable than what General Gates would have offered if he hadn't been worried about Sir Henry Clinton, who was finally making the expected move on the North River, heading as far as Æsopus.

The drafts made from Peekskill for both armies had left that post in a situation to require the aid of militia for its security. The requisitions of General Putnam were complied with; but the attack upon them being delayed, the militia, who were anxious to seed their farms, became impatient; many deserted; and General Putnam was induced to discharge the residue.

The drafts sent from Peekskill for both armies had left that post needing militia support for its protection. General Putnam's requests were met; however, since the attack on them was postponed, the militia, eager to tend to their farms, grew restless; many deserted, and General Putnam felt compelled to let the remaining soldiers go.

Governor Clinton immediately ordered out half the militia of New York, with assurances that they should be relieved in one month by the other half. This order was executed so slowly that the forts were carried before the militia were in the field.

Governor Clinton quickly ordered half of New York's militia to mobilize, promising that they would be replaced by the other half in a month. The execution of this order was so slow that the forts were captured before the militia was even deployed.

Great pains had been taken, and much labour employed, to render this position, which is naturally strong, still more secure. The principal defences were forts Montgomery and Clinton. They had been constructed on the western bank of the Hudson, on very high ground, extremely difficult of access, and were separated from each other by a small creek which runs from the mountains into the river. These forts were too much elevated to be battered from the water, and the hills on which they stood were too steep to be ascended by troops landing at the foot of them. The mountains, which commence five or six miles below them, are so high and rugged, the defiles, through which the roads leading to them pass, so narrow, and so commanded by the heights on both sides, that the approaches to them are extremely difficult and dangerous.

Great effort and a lot of work had been put into making this naturally strong position even more secure. The main defenses were Forts Montgomery and Clinton. They were built on the western bank of the Hudson River, on very high ground that was incredibly hard to access, and were separated by a small creek that runs from the mountains into the river. These forts were too high to be attacked from the water, and the steep hills they stood on couldn’t be climbed by troops landing at their base. The mountains, starting about five or six miles below, are so high and rugged, and the paths through which the roads reach them are so narrow and controlled by the heights on both sides, that getting to these forts is very challenging and risky.

To prevent ships from passing the forts, chevaux-de-frise had been sunk in the river, and a boom extended from bank to bank, which was covered with immense chains stretched at some distance in its front. These works were defended by the guns of the forts, and by a frigate and galleys stationed above them, capable of opposing with an equal fire in front any force which might attack them by water from below.

To stop ships from getting past the forts, obstacles were sunk in the river, and a barrier stretched from one bank to the other, covered with huge chains set out at some distance in front of it. These defenses were protected by the guns of the forts, along with a frigate and galleys positioned upstream, ready to counter any attack from below with equal firepower.

Fort Independence is four or five miles below forts Montgomery and Clinton, and on the opposite side of the river, on a high point of land; and fort Constitution is rather more than six miles above them, on an island near the eastern shore. Peekskill, the general head quarters of the officer commanding at the station, is just below fort Independence, and on the same side of the river. The garrisons had been reduced to about six hundred men; and the whole force under General Putnam did not much exceed two thousand. Yet this force, though far inferior to that which General Washington had ordered to be retained at the station, was, if properly applied, more than competent to the defence of the forts against any numbers which could be spared from New York. To insure success to the enterprise, it was necessary to draw the attention of Putnam from the real object, and to storm the works before the garrisons could be aided by his army. This Sir Henry Clinton accomplished.

Fort Independence is about four or five miles downstream from Forts Montgomery and Clinton, on the opposite side of the river, situated on a high piece of land. Fort Constitution is slightly more than six miles upstream from them, on an island near the eastern shore. Peekskill, the main headquarters of the officer in charge at the station, is right below Fort Independence, on the same side of the river. The garrisons had been reduced to around six hundred men, and the total force under General Putnam was just over two thousand. However, this force, while significantly less than the number General Washington had ordered to be kept at the station, was still more than enough to defend the forts against any troops that could be spared from New York if used effectively. To ensure success for the mission, it was crucial to distract Putnam from the real objective and launch an attack on the works before the garrisons could receive support from his army. Sir Henry Clinton managed to do this.

October 6.

Between three and four thousand men embarked at New York, and landed on the 5th of October at Verplank's Point, on the east side of the Hudson, a short distance below Peekskill, upon which General Putnam retired to the heights in his rear. On the evening of the same day, a part of these troops re-embarked, and the fleet moved up the river to Peekskill Neck, in order to mask King's ferry, which was below them. The next morning, at break of day, the troops destined for the enterprise, landed on the west side of Stony Point, and commenced their march through the mountains, into the rear of forts Clinton and Montgomery.[92] This disembarkation was observed; but the morning was so foggy that the numbers could not be distinguished; and a large fire, which was afterwards perceived at the landing place, suggested the idea that the sole object of the party on shore was the burning of some store houses. In the mean time, the manoeuvres of the vessels, and the appearance of a small detachment left at Verplank's Point, persuaded General Putnam that the meditated attack was on fort Independence.

Between three and four thousand men set sail from New York and landed on October 5th at Verplank's Point, on the east side of the Hudson River, just south of Peekskill, where General Putnam withdrew to the high ground behind him. That same evening, some of these troops re-embarked, and the fleet moved up the river to Peekskill Neck to cover King's ferry, which was downstream from them. The next morning, at dawn, the troops assigned for the mission landed on the west side of Stony Point and started their march through the mountains toward the rear of Forts Clinton and Montgomery.[92] This landing was noticed, but the morning fog was so thick that the numbers couldn't be clearly seen; a large fire that was later noticed at the landing site led to the belief that the only purpose of the men on shore was to burn some storehouses. Meanwhile, the movements of the ships and the presence of a small detachment left at Verplank's Point convinced General Putnam that the planned attack was on Fort Independence.

Forts Montgomery and Clinton taken by the British.

His whole attention was directed to this object; and the real designs of the enemy were not suspected, until a heavy firing from the other side of the river announced the assault on forts Clinton and Montgomery. Five hundred men were instantly detached to reinforce the garrisons of those places; but before this detachment could cross the river the forts were in possession of the British.

His entire focus was on this task; and the actual plans of the enemy weren’t recognized until heavy gunfire from the opposite side of the river signaled the attack on Forts Clinton and Montgomery. Five hundred men were quickly sent to reinforce the garrisons at those locations; however, before this group could cross the river, the British had already taken control of the forts.

Having left a battalion at the pass of Thunderhill, to keep up a communication, Sir Henry Clinton had formed his army into two divisions; one of which consisting of nine hundred men, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, made a circuit by the forest of Deane, in order to fall on the back of fort Montgomery; while the other, consisting of twelve hundred men, commanded by General Vaughan, and accompanied by Sir Henry Clinton in person, advanced slowly against fort Clinton.[93]

Having left a battalion at the Thunderhill pass to maintain communication, Sir Henry Clinton divided his army into two groups. One group, made up of nine hundred men and led by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, took a route through the Deane Forest to attack the rear of Fort Montgomery. The other group, consisting of twelve hundred men under General Vaughan, accompanied by Sir Henry Clinton himself, moved slowly toward Fort Clinton.[93]

Both posts were assaulted about five in the afternoon. The works were defended with resolution, and were maintained until dark, when, the lines being too extensive to be completely manned, the assailants entered them in different places. The defence being no longer possible, some of the garrison were made prisoners, while their better knowledge of the country enabled others to escape. Governor Clinton passed the river in a boat, and General James Clinton, though wounded in the thigh by a bayonet, also made his escape. Lieutenant Colonels Livingston and Bruyn, and Majors Hamilton and Logan were among the prisoners. The loss sustained by the garrisons was about two hundred and fifty men. That of the assailants, was stated by Sir H. Clinton, at less than two hundred. Among the killed were Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, and two other field officers.

Both posts were attacked around five in the afternoon. The defenses held strong and were maintained until dark, when the lines became too long to be fully manned, allowing the attackers to break through in various places. With defense no longer feasible, some of the garrison were taken prisoner, while others managed to escape thanks to their better knowledge of the area. Governor Clinton crossed the river in a boat, and General James Clinton, despite being wounded in the thigh by a bayonet, also made his escape. Lieutenant Colonels Livingston and Bruyn, along with Majors Hamilton and Logan, were among the prisoners. The garrisons lost about two hundred and fifty men, while the attackers' losses were reported by Sir H. Clinton to be less than two hundred. Among the deceased were Lieutenant Colonel Campbell and two other field officers.

Peekskill, together with Forts Independence and Constitution evacuated by the Americans.

As the boom and chains drawn across the river could no longer be defended, the continental frigates and galleys lying above them were burnt, to prevent their falling into the hands of the enemy. Fort Independence and fort Constitution were evacuated the next day, and Putnam retreated to Fishkill. General Vaughan, after burning Continental village, where stores to a considerable amount had been deposited, proceeded, at the head of a strong detachment, up the river to Æsopus, which he also destroyed.[94]

As the boom and chains across the river could no longer be defended, the continental frigates and galleys upstream were burned to prevent them from falling into enemy hands. Fort Independence and Fort Constitution were evacuated the next day, and Putnam retreated to Fishkill. General Vaughan, after setting fire to Continental Village, where a significant amount of supplies had been stored, led a strong detachment up the river to Æsopus, which he also destroyed.[94]

October 8.

General Putnam, whose army had been augmented by reinforcements of militia to six thousand men, detached General Parsons with two thousand, to repossess himself of Peekskill, and of the passes in the highlands; while, with the residue, he watched the progress of the enemy up the river. The want of heavy artillery prevented his annoying their ships in the Hudson.

General Putnam, whose army had been boosted by additional militia to six thousand men, sent General Parsons with two thousand to take back Peekskill and the passes in the highlands, while he kept an eye on the enemy’s movements up the river with the rest of his troops. The lack of heavy artillery prevented him from causing trouble for their ships in the Hudson.

On the capitulation of Burgoyne, near five thousand men had been detached by Gates to his aid. Before their arrival, General Vaughan had returned to New York, whence a reinforcement to General Howe was then about to sail.

On the surrender of Burgoyne, nearly five thousand men had been sent by Gates to help him. Before they got there, General Vaughan had gone back to New York, where a reinforcement for General Howe was about to set sail.

Great as was the injury sustained by the United States from this enterprise, Great Britain derived from it no solid advantage. It was undertaken at too late a period to save Burgoyne; and though the passes in the highlands were acquired, they could not be retained. The British had reduced to ashes every village, and almost every house within their power; but this wanton and useless destruction served to irritate, without tending to subdue. A keenness was given to the resentment of the injured, which outlasted the contest between the two nations.

As significant as the damage done to the United States from this initiative was, Great Britain gained no real benefit from it. It was attempted too late to rescue Burgoyne; and even though they captured the passes in the highlands, they couldn’t hold on to them. The British had burned down every village and nearly every house they could reach; however, this senseless and pointless destruction only fueled anger without achieving submission. It intensified the resentment of those who were wronged, lasting well beyond the conflict between the two countries.

The army which surrendered at Saratoga exceeded five thousand men. On marching from Ticonderoga, it was estimated at nine thousand. In addition to this great military force, the British lost, and the Americans acquired, a fine train of artillery, seven thousand stand of excellent arms, clothing for seven thousand recruits, with tents, and other military stores, to a considerable amount.

The army that surrendered at Saratoga had over five thousand men. When they marched from Ticonderoga, they were estimated to be around nine thousand. Besides this large military force, the British lost—and the Americans gained—a great supply of artillery, seven thousand high-quality weapons, uniforms for seven thousand new recruits, along with tents and other military supplies worth a significant amount.

The thanks of congress were voted to General Gates and his army; and a medal of gold, in commemoration of this great event, was ordered to be struck, and presented to him by the President, in the name of the United States. Colonel Wilkinson, his Adjutant General, whom he strongly recommended, was appointed Brigadier General by brevet.

The Congress voted to thank General Gates and his army, and a gold medal was commissioned to honor this significant event, which was to be presented to him by the President on behalf of the United States. Colonel Wilkinson, his Adjutant General, whom he highly recommended, was appointed Brigadier General by brevet.

 

Saratoga Battle Monument

Saratoga Battle Monument

The Saratoga Battle Monument

The Saratoga Battle Monument

Schuylerville, New York

Schuylerville, NY

"Nothing bespeaks more strongly the consummate tragedy of Benedict Arnold's career than the Battle Monument which rises on the banks of the Hudson to commemorate the victory of Saratoga. In the square shaft are four high Gothic arches, and in these are placed heroic statues of the generals who won the victory. Horatio Gates, unworthy though he was, stands there in bronze. The gallant Schuyler, the intrepid Morgan, honor the other two. But where is he whose valor turned back the advancing Saint-Leger? whose prompt decision saved the Continental position at Bemis Heights? whose military genius truly gained the day? A vacant niche—empty as England's rewards, void as his own life—speaks more eloquently than words, more strongly than condemnation, more pitifully than tears, of a mighty career blighted by treason and hurled into the bottomless pit of despair. This is America's way of honoring Arnold in his dishonor."

"Nothing illustrates the complete tragedy of Benedict Arnold's career more than the Battle Monument that stands on the banks of the Hudson to honor the victory of Saratoga. The square shaft features four tall Gothic arches, and within them are heroic statues of the generals who achieved the victory. Horatio Gates, undeserving as he was, is there in bronze. The brave Schuyler and the fearless Morgan honor the other two. But where is the one whose bravery pushed back the advancing Saint-Leger? Whose quick decision saved the Continental position at Bemis Heights? Whose military brilliance truly won the day? A vacant niche—empty like England's rewards, void like his own life—speaks more powerfully than words, stronger than condemnation, more sorrowfully than tears, of a remarkable career ruined by betrayal and plunged into eternal despair. This is America's way of honoring Arnold in his disgrace.

—From The Real America in Romance.

—From The Real America in Romance.

 

In the opinion that the British would not immediately abandon the passes in the highlands, congress ordered Putnam to join General Washington with a reinforcement not exceeding two thousand five hundred men, and directed Gates to take command of the army on the Hudson, with unlimited powers to call for aids of militia from the New England States, as well as from New York and New Jersey.

In the belief that the British wouldn't quickly leave the highland passes, Congress ordered Putnam to join General Washington with a reinforcement not exceeding two thousand five hundred men and directed Gates to take command of the army on the Hudson, with full authority to request militia support from the New England states, as well as from New York and New Jersey.

A proposition to authorize the Commander-in-chief, after consulting with General Gates and Governor Clinton, to increase the detachment designed to strengthen his army, if he should then be of opinion that it might be done without endangering the objects to be accomplished by Gates, was seriously opposed. An attempt was made to amend this proposition so as to make the increase of the reinforcement to depend on the assent of Gates and Clinton; but this amendment was lost by a considerable majority, and the original resolution was carried. These proceedings were attended with no other consequences than to excite some degree of attention to the state of parties.

A proposal was made to give the Commander-in-Chief, after consulting with General Gates and Governor Clinton, the authority to increase the detachment meant to strengthen his army if he believed it could be done without jeopardizing Gates's objectives. This was met with serious opposition. An attempt was made to change the proposal so that the increase in reinforcements would depend on the approval of Gates and Clinton, but this amendment was defeated by a significant majority, and the original resolution was passed. These proceedings did not lead to any other consequences besides drawing some attention to the state of the parties.

Ticonderoga and Mount Independence evacuated by the enemy.

Soon after the capitulation of Burgoyne, Ticonderoga and Mount Independence were evacuated, and the garrison retired to Isle Aux Noix, and St. Johns.

Soon after Burgoyne surrendered, Ticonderoga and Mount Independence were abandoned, and the troops withdrew to Isle Aux Noix and St. Johns.

The effect produced by this event on the British cabinet and nation was great and immediate. It seemed to remove the delusive hopes of conquest with which they had been flattered, and suddenly to display the mass of resistance which must yet be encountered. Previous to the reception of this disastrous intelligence, the employment of savages in the war had been the subject of severe animadversion. Parliament was assembled on the 20th of November; and, as usual, addresses were proposed in answer to the speech from the throne, entirely approving the conduct of the administration. In the House of Lords, the Earl of Chatham moved to amend the address by introducing a clause recommending to his Majesty, an immediate cessation of hostilities, and the commencement of a treaty of conciliation, "to restore peace and liberty to America, strength and happiness to England, security and permanent prosperity to both countries." In the course of the very animated observations made by this extraordinary man in support of his motion, he said,[95] "But, my Lords, who is the man that, in addition to the disgraces and mischiefs of war, has dared to authorize and associate to our arms the tomahawk and scalping-knife of the savage? to call into civilized alliance the wild and inhuman inhabitant of the woods? to delegate to the merciless Indian the defence of disputed rights, and to wage the horrors of his barbarous war against our brethren? My Lords, these enormities cry aloud for redress and punishment. Unless thoroughly done away they will be a stain on the national character. It is not the least of our national misfortunes that the strength and character of our army are thus impaired. Familiarized to the horrid scenes of savage cruelty, it can no longer boast of the noble and generous principles which dignify a soldier. No longer sympathize with the dignity of the royal banner, nor feel the pride, pomp, and circumstance of glorious war that makes ambition virtue. What makes ambition virtue? the sense of honour. But is this sense of honour consistent with the spirit of plunder, or the practice of murder? Can it flow from mercenary motives? or can it prompt to cruel deeds?"[96]

The impact of this event on the British cabinet and the nation was significant and immediate. It seemed to shatter the misleading hopes of conquest that they had been indulging in and suddenly revealed the strong resistance that still lay ahead. Before receiving this devastating news, the use of Native Americans in the conflict had been heavily criticized. Parliament met on November 20th, and, as usual, addresses were proposed in response to the speech from the throne, fully supporting the actions of the government. In the House of Lords, the Earl of Chatham proposed to amend the address by adding a clause urging the King to immediately stop hostilities and start a peace treaty, "to restore peace and liberty to America, strength and happiness to England, security and lasting prosperity to both countries." During his passionate remarks supporting his motion, this remarkable man stated, [95] "But, my Lords, who is the person that, in addition to the humiliations and harms of war, has dared to authorize and associate with our military the tomahawk and scalping-knife of the Native American? To call upon the savage and inhuman inhabitants of the woods as allies in civilized warfare? To hand over the defense of disputed rights to the merciless Native American and to unleash the horrors of their brutal war against our fellow countrymen? My Lords, these atrocities cry out for correction and punishment. Unless completely addressed, they will tarnish our national character. One of our national misfortunes is that the strength and integrity of our army are thus compromised. Having been exposed to the horrific scenes of savage cruelty, it can no longer claim the noble and honorable principles that elevate a soldier. It can no longer empathize with the dignity of the royal banner, nor feel the pride, spectacle, and honor of glorious warfare that make ambition virtuous. What makes ambition virtuous? The sense of honor. But is this sense of honor compatible with the spirit of plunder or the act of murder? Can it arise from mercenary motives? Or can it lead to cruel actions?" [96]

The conduct of administration, however, received the full approbation of large majorities; but the triumph these victories in Parliament afforded them was of short duration. The disastrous issue of an expedition from which the most sanguine expectations had been formed, was soon known, and the mortification it produced was extreme. A reluctant confession of the calamity was made by the minister, and a desire to restore peace on any terms consistent with the integrity of the empire found its way into the cabinet.

The way the administration operated, however, received strong approval from large majorities; but the triumph these victories in Parliament brought them was short-lived. The unfortunate outcome of an expedition, from which the most optimistic hopes had been held, became known quickly, and the disappointment it caused was intense. The minister reluctantly admitted to the disaster, and there was a growing desire within the cabinet to restore peace at any cost that maintained the integrity of the empire.


CHAPTER XI.

Defects in the Commissary department.... Distress of the army at Valley Forge.... The army subsisted by impressments.... Combination in congress against General Washington.... Correspondence between him and General Gates.... Distress of the army for clothes.... Washington's exertions to augment the army.... Congress sends a committee to camp.... Attempt to surprise Captain Lee.... Congress determines on a second expedition to Canada.... Abandons it.... General Conway resigns.... The Baron Steuben appointed Inspector General.... Congress forbids the embarkation of Burgoyne's army.... Plan of reconciliation agreed to in Parliament.... Communicated to congress and rejected.... Information of treaties between France and the United States.... Great Britain declares war against France.... The treaties with France ratified by congress.... Complaints of the treatment of prisoners.... A partial exchange agreed to.

Issues in the Commissary department.... The army's struggles at Valley Forge.... The army survived by requisitioning supplies.... A coalition in Congress against General Washington.... Correspondence between him and General Gates.... The army's need for clothing.... Washington’s efforts to strengthen the army.... Congress sends a committee to the camp.... An attempt to surprise Captain Lee.... Congress decides on a second expedition to Canada.... It gets abandoned.... General Conway resigns.... Baron Steuben is appointed Inspector General.... Congress prohibits Burgoyne's army from embarking.... A plan for reconciliation is agreed upon in Parliament.... It is shared with Congress and rejected.... News about treaties between France and the United States.... Great Britain declares war against France.... The treaties with France are ratified by Congress.... Complaints about how prisoners are treated.... A limited exchange of prisoners is agreed upon.

 

1777

The army under the immediate command of General Washington was engaged through the winter in endeavouring to stop the intercourse between Philadelphia and the country. To effect this object General Smallwood was detached with one division to Wilmington; Colonel Morgan was placed on the lines on the west side of the Schuylkill; and General Armstrong, with the Pennsylvania militia, was stationed near the old camp at White Marsh. Major Jameson, with two troops of cavalry, and M'Lane's infantry, was directed to guard the east, and Captain Lee with his troop, the west side of that river. General Count Pulaski, a Polish nobleman who commanded the horse, led the residue of the cavalry to Trenton, where he trained them for the ensuing campaign.

The army under General Washington’s direct command was busy during the winter trying to cut off communication between Philadelphia and the countryside. To achieve this, General Smallwood was sent with one division to Wilmington; Colonel Morgan was assigned to the lines on the west side of the Schuylkill; and General Armstrong, along with the Pennsylvania militia, was positioned near the old camp at White Marsh. Major Jameson, with two troops of cavalry and M'Lane's infantry, was tasked with guarding the east, while Captain Lee and his troop secured the west side of the river. General Count Pulaski, a Polish nobleman leading the cavalry, took the remaining cavalry to Trenton, where he trained them for the upcoming campaign.

December 22.

One of the first operations meditated by General Washington after crossing the Schuylkill was the destruction of a large quantity of hay which remained in the islands above the mouth of Derby Creek, within the power of the British. Early in the morning after his orders for this purpose had been given, Sir William Howe marched out in full force, and encamped between Derby and the middle party, so as completely to cover the islands; while a foraging party removed the hay. Washington, with the intention of disturbing this operation, gave orders for putting his army in motion, when the alarming fact was disclosed, that the commissary's stores were exhausted, and that the last ration had been delivered and consumed.

One of the first actions General Washington considered after crossing the Schuylkill was to destroy a large stock of hay that was left on the islands above the mouth of Derby Creek, which was under British control. Early the next morning, after he had given the orders for this task, Sir William Howe marched out in full force and set up camp between Derby and the middle party to completely cover the islands, while a foraging party gathered the hay. Washington, intending to disrupt this operation, ordered his army to mobilize, but then he discovered the alarming fact that the commissary's supplies were depleted, and that the last ration had been issued and consumed.

Accustomed as were the continental troops to privations of every sort, it would have been hazarding too much to move them, under these circumstances, against a powerful enemy. In a desert, or in a garrison where food is unattainable, courage, patriotism, and habits of discipline, enable the soldier to conquer wants which, in ordinary situations, would be deemed invincible. But to perish in a country abounding with provisions, requires something more than fortitude; nor can soldiers readily submit, while in such a country, to the deprivation of food. It is not therefore surprising that, among a few of the troops, some indications of a mutiny appeared. It is much more astonishing that the great body of the army bore a circumstance so irritating, and to them so unaccountable, without a murmur.

Used to facing all kinds of hardships, the continental troops were at serious risk if they were pushed to fight a powerful enemy under these conditions. In a desert or a garrison where food is unavailable, courage, patriotism, and discipline allow soldiers to overcome needs that would usually seem insurmountable. However, to starve in a land rich with supplies requires more than just bravery; soldiers aren’t likely to tolerate a lack of food in such a place. So, it’s not surprising that some signs of mutiny surfaced among a few of the troops. It’s even more remarkable that the majority of the army handled such a frustrating and puzzling situation without complaining.

On receiving intelligence of the fact, General Washington ordered the country to be scoured, and provisions, for supplying the pressing wants of the moment, to be seized wherever found. In the mean time, light parties were detached to harass the enemy about Derby, where Sir William Howe, with his accustomed circumspection, kept his army so compact, and his soldiers so within the lines, that an opportunity to annoy him was seldom afforded even to the vigilance of Morgan and Lee. After completing his forage, he returned, with inconsiderable loss, to Philadelphia.

Upon hearing the news, General Washington ordered the countryside to be searched, and provisions to be taken wherever they could be found to meet the urgent needs of the moment. Meanwhile, small groups were sent out to trouble the enemy around Derby, where Sir William Howe, being careful as always, kept his army tightly organized and his soldiers close to their lines, making it rare for even the alert Morgan and Lee to find a chance to bother him. After finishing his mission, he returned to Philadelphia with minimal losses.

That the American army, while the value still retained by paper bills placed ample funds in the hands of government, should be destitute of food, in the midst of a state so abounding with provisions as Pennsylvania, is one of those extraordinary facts which can not fail to excite attention.

That the American army, despite the value that paper bills still held, had enough money for the government yet was lacking food in a state like Pennsylvania, which was overflowing with supplies, is one of those remarkable facts that definitely grabs attention.

Defects in the Commissary Department.

Early in the war, the office of commissary general had been confirmed on Colonel Trumbull, of Connecticut, a gentleman fitted by his talents, activity and zeal, for that important station. Yet, from the difficulty of arranging so complicated a department in its commencement, without the advantages of experience, complaints were repeatedly made of the insufficiency of supplies.

Early in the war, Colonel Trumbull from Connecticut was appointed as the commissary general, a position well-suited to his skills, energy, and enthusiasm. However, due to the challenges of organizing such a complex department at the start, without the benefit of prior experience, there were frequent complaints about the lack of adequate supplies.

The subject was taken up by congress; but the remedy administered, as well from the time of its application, as from the ingredients of which it was composed, served only to increase the disease. The system was not completed until near midsummer; and then its arrangements were such that Colonel Trumbull refused to accept the office assigned to him; and new men were to be called into service at a time when the strongest necessity required the exertions of those who understood the plan of supplies for the campaign in all its modifications. In addition to the commissary of purchases, and a commissary general of issues, each to be appointed by congress, the new plan contemplated four deputies in each department, also to be appointed by that body, who were not accountable to, nor removeable by the head of the department, but might be suspended, and accused before congress who should examine the charge, and either remove the accused from his office, or reinstate him in it.

The topic was addressed by Congress; however, the solution provided, both due to when it was implemented and the ingredients it contained, only worsened the issue. The system wasn't finalized until around midsummer; and then its setup was such that Colonel Trumbull declined the position assigned to him; new people were to be brought in at a time when the greatest need required the efforts of those who understood the supply plan for the campaign in all its forms. In addition to a purchases commissary and a general issues commissary, each to be appointed by Congress, the new plan included four deputies in each department, also to be appointed by that body, who were not accountable to or removable by the head of the department, but could be suspended and accused before Congress, which would investigate the charges and either remove the person from office or reinstate them.

Distress of the American army at Valley Forge for provisions.

This imperium in imperio, erected in direct opposition to the opinion of the Commander-in-chief, drove Colonel Trumbull from the army. Congress, however, persisted in the system; and the effects of deranging so important a department as that which feeds the troops, in the midst of a campaign, were not long in unfolding themselves. In every military division of the continent, loud complaints were made of the deficiency of supplies. The success of Gates appears to have been more endangered by this cause, than by the movement of Sir Henry Clinton up the Hudson. The army of General Washington was often greatly embarrassed, and his movements not unfrequently suspended, by the want of provisions. The present total failure of all supply was preceded, for a few days, by the issuing of meat unfit to be eaten. Representations on this subject were made to the Commander-in-chief, who, on the morning that Sir William Howe moved out to Derby, and before intelligence of that movement had been received, communicated them to congress.

This imperium in imperio, established directly against the Commander-in-chief's wishes, pushed Colonel Trumbull out of the army. However, Congress continued with this system, and the consequences of disrupting such a critical department — especially one that supplies the troops in the middle of a campaign — quickly became apparent. Each military division across the continent was filled with complaints about the lack of supplies. Gates's success seemed to be more threatened by this issue than by Sir Henry Clinton’s advance up the Hudson. General Washington’s army often faced significant difficulties, and his movements were frequently halted due to food shortages. The complete failure of supplies was preceded, for a few days, by the distribution of inedible meat. Concerns about this were brought to the Commander-in-chief, who, on the morning that Sir William Howe moved out to Derby, and before news of that movement had arrived, communicated these issues to Congress.

The army subsisted in a great measure by impressments.

That body had authorized the Commander-in-chief to seize provisions for the use of his army within seventy miles of head quarters; and either to pay for them in money, or in certificates, for the redemption of which the faith of the United States was pledged. The odium of this measure was increased by the failure of the government to provide funds to take up these certificates when presented.

That body had given the Commander-in-chief permission to take supplies for his army within seventy miles of headquarters; and to either pay for them in cash or with certificates, for which the United States had promised to redeem. The negative perception of this action was worsened by the government's failure to provide funds to cash in those certificates when they were presented.

At the same time, the provisions carried into Philadelphia were paid for in specie at a good price. The inhabitants of that part of Pennsylvania were not zealous in support of the war, and the difference between prompt payment in gold or silver, and a certificate, the value of which was often diminished by depreciation before its payment, was too great not to influence their wishes and their conduct. Such was the dexterity they employed that, notwithstanding the rigour of the laws, and the vigilance of the troops stationed on the lines, they often succeeded in concealing their provisions from those who were authorized to impress for the army, and in conveying them privately into Philadelphia.

At the same time, the supplies brought to Philadelphia were paid for in cash at a good rate. The people in that area of Pennsylvania weren't very enthusiastic about supporting the war, and the contrast between getting immediate payment in gold or silver and receiving a certificate—whose value often dropped due to depreciation before it was cashed—was too significant to ignore in shaping their preferences and actions. They used such clever tactics that, despite the strictness of the laws and the watchfulness of the troops stationed along the borders, they frequently managed to hide their supplies from those authorized to requisition for the army and privately bring them into Philadelphia.

December 10.

General Washington exercised the powers confided to him with caution, but he did exercise them; and by doing so, acquired considerable supplies. Congress appeared as much dissatisfied with the lenity of the Commander-in-chief, as the people were with his rigour, in consequence of which the subject was taken into consideration, his forbearance disapproved, and instructions given for the rigorous exertions in future of the powers with which he was invested. In reply to the letter communicating these resolves, the General stated the conduct he had observed, insisted that provisions had been taken very extensively, and repeated his opinion, that such measures would be much more readily submitted to if executed by the civil authority.

General Washington handled the powers entrusted to him carefully, but he did use them; as a result, he acquired significant supplies. Congress was just as unhappy with the leniency of the Commander-in-chief as the public was with his strictness, leading to a discussion on the matter. His restraint was criticized, and he received instructions to take a tougher approach moving forward with the powers he held. In response to the letter outlining these decisions, the General explained the actions he had taken, stressed that provisions had been obtained quite broadly, and reiterated his belief that such actions would be accepted more willingly if carried out by civil authorities.

In obedience, however, to the will of congress, he issued a proclamation, requiring the farmers within seventy miles of head quarters, to thrash out one half of their grain by the first of February, and the residue by the first of March, under the penalty of having the whole seized as straw.

In obedience to the will of Congress, he issued a proclamation requiring farmers within seventy miles of headquarters to thresh half of their grain by February 1st and the rest by March 1st, with the penalty of having all of it seized as straw.

The success of this experiment did not correspond with the wishes of congress. It was attended with the pernicious consequences which had been foreseen by the General, to avoid which he had considered this system as a dernier ressort, of which he was to avail himself only in extreme cases. In answer to a letter on this subject from the board of war, he said, "I shall use every exertion that may be expedient and practicable for subsisting the army, and keeping it together; but I must observe, that this never can be done by coercive means. Supplies of provisions and clothing must be had in another way, or it can not exist. The small seizures that were made of the former some time ago, in consequence of the most pressing and urgent necessity—when the alternative was to do that or dissolve—excited the greatest alarm and uneasiness imaginable, even among some of our best and warmest friends. Such procedures may relieve for an instant, but eventually will prove of the most pernicious consequence. Besides spreading disaffection and jealousy among the people, they never fail, even in the most veteran armies, to raise in the soldiery a disposition to licentiousness, plunder, and robbery, which it has ever been found exceeding difficult to suppress; and which has not only proved ruinous to the inhabitants, but, in many instances, to the armies themselves." In a subsequent letter to congress, he added, "I regret the occasion which compelled us to the measure the other day, and shall consider it as among the greatest of our misfortunes to be under the necessity of practising it again. I am now obliged to keep several parties from the army thrashing grain, that our supplies may not fail; but this will not do."

The success of this experiment didn’t match what Congress wanted. It led to the harmful consequences that the General had predicted, which is why he thought of this system as a last resort that he would only use in extreme cases. In response to a letter on this topic from the board of war, he said, "I will put in every effort that is reasonable and possible to sustain the army and keep it together; but I must point out that this can never be accomplished through coercive means. We must obtain supplies of food and clothing in another way, or they cannot exist. The small seizures that were made of food some time ago, due to the most pressing and urgent necessity—when the choice was to do that or dissolve—caused immense alarm and concern, even among some of our best and closest friends. Such actions may provide temporary relief, but ultimately, they will have the most harmful consequences. Besides creating discontent and jealousy among the people, they inevitably foster a tendency towards misconduct, looting, and robbery within the soldiers, which has always proven extremely difficult to control; and this has not only harmed the locals but, in many cases, the armies themselves." In a later letter to Congress, he added, "I regret the situation that forced us into that measure the other day, and I will consider it one of our biggest misfortunes to have to do it again. I now have to keep several groups from the army busy thrashing grain so that our supplies won’t run out; but this won’t work."

Combination formed in Congress against General Washington.
General Gates supposed to be concerned in it.

About this time, a strong combination was forming against the Commander-in-chief, into which several members of congress, and a very few officers of the army are believed to have entered.

About this time, a powerful alliance was forming against the Commander-in-chief, which several members of Congress and a small number of army officers are believed to have joined.

The splendour with which the capture of a British army had surrounded the military reputation of General Gates, acquired some advocates for the opinion that the arms of America would be more fortunate, should that gentleman be elevated to the supreme command. He could not be supposed hostile himself to the prevalence of this opinion; and some parts of his conduct would seem to warrant a belief that, if it did not originate with him, he was not among the last to adopt it. After the victory of the seventh of October had opened to him the prospect of subduing the arms of Burgoyne, he not only omitted to communicate his success to General Washington, Correspondence on this subject between the two generals.but carried on a correspondence with General Conway, in which that officer expressed great contempt for the Commander-in-chief. When the purport of this correspondence was disclosed to General Washington, Gates demanded the name of the informer in a letter far from being conciliatory in its terms, which was accompanied with the very extraordinary circumstance of being passed through congress.[97] The state of Pennsylvania too, chagrined at the loss of its capital, and forgetful of its own backwardness in strengthening the army, which had twice fought superior numbers in its defence, furnished many discontented individuals. They imputed it to General Washington as a fault that, with forces inferior to his enemy in numbers, and in every equipment, he had not effected the same result which had been produced in the north, by a continental army, in itself, much stronger than its adversary, and so reinforced by militia as to treble his numbers. On the report that General Washington was moving into winter quarters, the legislature of that state addressed a remonstrance to congress on the subject, manifesting, in very intelligible terms, their dissatisfaction with the Commander-in-chief. About the same time, a new board of war was created, of which General Gates was appointed the President; and General Mifflin, who was supposed to be of the party unfriendly to Washington, was one of its members. General Conway, who was probably the only brigadier in the army that had joined this faction, was appointed inspector general, and was promoted, above senior brigadiers, to the rank of major general. These were evidences that, if the hold which the Commander-in-chief had taken of the affections and confidence of the army and of the nation could be loosened, the party in congress disposed to change their general, was far from being contemptible in point of numbers. But to loosen this hold was impossible. The indignation with which the idea of such a change was received even by the victorious troops who had conquered under Gates, forms the most conclusive proof of its strength. Even the northern army clung to Washington as the saviour of his country.

The glory surrounding the capture of a British army boosted General Gates' military reputation, leading some to believe that America's fortunes would improve if he were put in charge. He didn't seem opposed to this idea, and parts of his behavior suggested that he either started this belief or was among the last to disagree with it. After the victory on October 7 opened the way for defeating Burgoyne, he not only failed to inform General Washington of his success, Communication on this topic between the two generals.but also communicated with General Conway, who openly disrespected the Commander-in-chief. When Washington found out about this correspondence, Gates demanded to know who had informed him, writing a letter that was far from friendly and was strangely sent through Congress.[97] Pennsylvania, upset about losing its capital and forgetting its own failure to strengthen the army—which had faced superior numbers twice in its defense—had plenty of unhappy individuals. They blamed General Washington for not achieving the same success against his enemy, despite having weaker forces in terms of numbers and supplies, as had been done in the north by a much stronger continental army that also had militia reinforcements. When news spread that Washington was moving into winter quarters, the state legislature sent a complaint to Congress, clearly showing their dissatisfaction with the Commander-in-chief. Around the same time, a new board of war was formed, with General Gates as President, and General Mifflin, believed to be against Washington, was included as a member. General Conway, likely the only brigadier in the army who had aligned with this faction, was named inspector general and promoted to major general over senior brigadiers. These moves indicated that if the hold Washington had on the army and the nation could be weakened, the group in Congress wanting to replace him was significant in numbers. However, weakening that hold was impossible. The outrage that greeted the idea of such a change—even among the victorious troops who had fought under Gates—illustrates how strong that hold was. Even the northern army held on to Washington as the savior of the nation.

These machinations to diminish the well-earned reputation of the Commander-in-chief, could not escape his notice. They made, however, no undue impression on his steady mind, nor did they change one of his measures. His sensibilities seem to have been those of patriotism, of apprehension for his country, rather than of wounded pride. His desire to remain at the head of the army seemed to flow from the conviction that his retaining that station would be useful to his country, rather than from the gratification his high rank might furnish to ambition. When he unbosomed himself to his private friends, the feelings and sentiments he expressed were worthy of Washington. To Mr. Laurens, the president of congress, and his private friend, who, in an unofficial letter, had communicated an anonymous accusation made to him as president, containing heavy charges against the Commander-in-chief, he said, "I can not sufficiently express the obligation I feel towards you for your friendship and politeness upon an occasion in which I am deeply interested. I was not unapprised that a malignant faction had been for some time forming to my prejudice, which, conscious as I am of having ever done all in my power to answer the important purposes of the trusts reposed in me, could not but give me some pain on a personal account; but my chief concern arises from an apprehension of the dangerous consequences which intestine dissensions may produce to the common cause.

These schemes to undermine the well-deserved reputation of the Commander-in-Chief didn’t go unnoticed by him. However, they didn’t have any significant impact on his steadfast mind, nor did they alter any of his plans. His feelings seemed to be driven by patriotism and concern for his country, rather than by hurt pride. His wish to stay at the head of the army appeared to stem from a belief that his position would benefit the nation, not from the satisfaction his rank might bring to his ambition. When he confided in his close friends, the thoughts and feelings he shared were truly worthy of Washington. To Mr. Laurens, the president of Congress and his personal friend, who had shared an unofficial letter with an anonymous accusation against him containing serious charges, he said, “I can’t express enough how grateful I am for your friendship and kindness during this deeply concerning time for me. I was aware that a malicious group had been forming against me for some time, which, knowing I’ve always done my best to fulfill the important duties entrusted to me, was personally upsetting. However, my greatest worry comes from the fear of the harmful effects that internal conflicts may have on our shared cause."

"As I have no other view than to promote the public good, and am unambitious of honours not founded in the approbation of my country, I would not desire, in the least degree, to suppress a free spirit of inquiry into any part of my conduct that even faction itself may deem reprehensible. The anonymous paper handed you exhibits many serious charges, and it is my wish that it may be submitted to congress. This I am the more inclined to, as the suppression or concealment may possibly involve you in embarrassment hereafter, since it is uncertain how many, or who, may be privy to the contents.

"As I have no other goal than to promote the public good, and I’m not seeking honors that aren’t based on my country’s approval, I don’t want to suppress anyone's right to freely inquire into any aspect of my actions that even opposing factions may find objectionable. The anonymous document you received contains several serious accusations, and I would like it to be presented to Congress. I feel this way even more strongly because hiding or ignoring it might lead to difficulties for you in the future, since it’s unclear how many people, or who, are aware of its contents."

"My enemies take an ungenerous advantage of me. They know the delicacy of my situation, and that motives of policy deprive me of the defence I might otherwise make against their insidious attacks. They know I can not combat their insinuations, however injurious, without disclosing secrets it is of the utmost moment to conceal. But why should I expect to be free from censure, the unfailing lot of an elevated station? Merit and talents which I can not pretend to rival, have ever been subject to it. My heart tells me it has been my unremitted aim to do the best which circumstances would permit. Yet I may have been very often mistaken in my judgment of the means, and may in many instances deserve the imputation of error."[98]

"My enemies are taking unfair advantage of me. They understand how vulnerable my situation is, and that political reasons prevent me from defending myself against their sneaky attacks. They know I can’t fight back against their hurtful insinuations without revealing secrets that are critical to keep hidden. But why should I expect to escape criticism, which is the inevitable fate of someone in a high position? Skills and talents that I can't pretend to match have always faced it. My heart tells me that I’ve always aimed to do the best I can given the circumstances. Yet I may have often been wrong in judging the best course of action, and in many cases, I might deserve the label of error." [98]

Fortunately for America, these combinations only excited resentment against those who were believed to be engaged in them.

Fortunately for America, these groups only stirred up anger against those thought to be involved in them.

December.

Soon after being informed of the unfavourable disposition of some members of congress towards him, and receiving the memorial of the legislature of Pennsylvania against his going into winter quarters, the General also discovered the failure already mentioned in the commissary department. On this occasion, he addressed congress in terms of energy and plainness which he had used on no former occasion. December 23.In his letter to that body he said, "Full as I was in my representation of the matters in the commissary's department yesterday, fresh and more powerful reasons oblige me to add that I am now convinced beyond a doubt that, unless some great and capital change suddenly takes place in that line, this army must inevitably be reduced to one or other of these three things—to starve, dissolve, or disperse in order to obtain subsistence. Rest assured, sir, that this is not an exaggerated picture, and that I have abundant reason to suppose what I say.

Soon after hearing about the negative attitudes of some members of Congress towards him and receiving the Pennsylvania legislature's petition against his taking winter quarters, the General also noticed the failure in the commissary department that was mentioned earlier. On this occasion, he addressed Congress with a level of urgency and straightforwardness he hadn't used before. December 23rd. In his letter to them, he stated, "As thorough as I was in my account of the issues in the commissary department yesterday, new and stronger reasons compel me to add that I am now completely convinced that unless some significant and fundamental change happens in that area, this army will inevitably be left with one of three options—to starve, fall apart, or scatter in search of food. Rest assured, sir, that this isn't an exaggeration, and I have plenty of reasons to believe what I’m saying."

"Saturday afternoon, receiving information that the enemy, in force, had left the city, and were advancing towards Derby with apparent design to forage, and draw subsistence from that part of the country, I ordered the troops to be in readiness, that I might give every opposition in my power; when, to my great mortification, I was not only informed, but convinced, that the men were unable to stir on account of a want of provisions; and that a dangerous mutiny, begun the night before, and which with difficulty was suppressed by the spirited exertions of some officers, was still much to be apprehended from the want of this article.

"Saturday afternoon, I received word that the enemy had left the city in force and was moving toward Derby, apparently planning to gather supplies from that area. I ordered the troops to be ready so that I could put up as much resistance as possible. To my great dismay, I learned—and was convinced—that the men were unable to move due to a lack of food. A dangerous mutiny had started the night before and, although some officers managed to suppress it with considerable effort, it was still a serious concern due to the scarcity of supplies."

"This brought forth the only commissary in the purchasing line in this camp, and with him this melancholy and alarming truth, that he had not a single hoof of any kind to slaughter, and not more than twenty-five barrels of flour! From hence, form an opinion of our situation, when I add that he could not tell when to expect any.

"This revealed the only commissary in charge of supplies in this camp, and with him came the sad and worrying truth that he didn’t have a single animal to slaughter, and only about twenty-five barrels of flour! From this, you can understand our situation when I add that he couldn’t tell us when we might expect more supplies."

Distress of the American army for clothes.

"All I could do under these circumstances, was to send out a few light parties to watch and harass the enemy, whilst other parties were instantly detached different ways to collect, if possible, as much provision as would satisfy the present pressing wants of the soldiers; but will this answer? No, sir. Three or four days of bad weather would prove our destruction. What then is to become of the army this winter? And if we are now as often without provisions as with them, what is to become of us in the spring, when our force will be collected, with the aid perhaps of militia, to take advantage of an early campaign before the enemy can be reinforced? These are considerations of great magnitude, meriting the closest attention, and will, when my own reputation is so intimately connected with, and to be affected by the event, justify my saying, that the present commissaries are by no means equal to the execution of the office, or that the disaffection of the people surpasses all belief. The misfortune, however, does, in my opinion, proceed from both causes; and, though I have been tender heretofore of giving any opinion, or of lodging complaints, as the change in that department took place contrary to my judgment, and the consequences thereof were predicted; yet, finding that the inactivity of the army, whether for want of provisions, clothes, or other essentials, is charged to my account, not only by the common vulgar, but by those in power; it is time to speak plain in exculpation of myself. With truth, then, I can declare that no man, in my opinion, ever had his measures more impeded than I have, by every department of the army. Since the month of July, we have had no assistance from the quartermaster general; and to want of assistance from this department, the commissary general charges great part of his deficiency. To this I am to add that, notwithstanding it is a standing order (often repeated) that the troops shall always have two days provisions by them, that they may be ready at any sudden call; yet, scarcely any opportunity has ever offered of taking advantage of the enemy, that has not been either totally obstructed, or greatly impeded, on this account; and this, the great and crying evil is not all. Soap, vinegar, and other articles allowed by congress, we see none of, nor have we seen them, I believe, since the battle of Brandywine. The first, indeed, we have little occasion for; few men having more than one shirt, many, only the moiety of one, and some, none at all. In addition to which, as a proof of the little benefit from a clothier general, and at the same time, as a farther proof of the inability of an army under the circumstances of this to perform the common duties of soldiers, we have, by a field return this day made, besides a number of men confined to hospitals for want of shoes, and others in farmers' houses on the same account, no less than two thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight men, now in camp, unfit for duty, because they are bare-foot, and otherwise naked. By the same return, it appears that our whole strength in continental troops, including the eastern brigades, which have joined us since the surrender of General Burgoyne, exclusive of the Maryland troops sent to Wilmington, amounts to no more than eight thousand two hundred in camp fit for duty; notwithstanding which, and that since the fourth instant, our number fit for duty, from the hardships and exposures they have undergone, particularly from the want of blankets, have decreased near two thousand men, we find gentlemen, without knowing whether the army was really going into winter quarters or not, (for I am sure no resolution of mine would warrant the remonstrance), reprobating the measure as much as if they thought the soldiers were made of stocks or stones, and equally insensible of frost and snow; and moreover, as if they conceived it easily practicable for an inferior army, under the disadvantages I have described ours to be, which are by no means exaggerated, to confine a superior one, in all respects well appointed and provided for a winter's campaign, within the city of Philadelphia, and to cover from depredation and waste the states of Pennsylvania, Jersey, &c. But what makes this matter still more extraordinary in my eye is, that these very gentlemen, who were well apprised of the nakedness of the troops from ocular demonstration, who thought their own soldiers worse clad than others, and advised me, near a month ago, to postpone the execution of a plan I was about to adopt, in consequence of a resolve of Congress for seizing clothes, under strong assurances that an ample supply would be collected in ten days, agreeably to a decree of the state; (not one article of which by the by is yet to come to hand,) should think a winter's campaign, and the covering of their states from the invasion of an enemy, so easy and practicable a business. I can assure those gentlemen, that it is a much easier and less distressing thing to draw remonstrances in a comfortable room, by a good fireside, than to occupy a cold bleak hill, and sleep under frost and snow, without clothes or blankets. However, although they seem to have little feeling for the naked and distressed soldiers, I feel superabundantly for them, and from my soul pity those miseries which it is not in my power either to relieve or to prevent."

"All I could do under these circumstances was to send out a few small groups to watch and annoy the enemy, while other groups were quickly sent in different directions to gather whatever supplies we could to meet the urgent needs of the soldiers. But will this work? No, sir. A few days of bad weather would lead to our downfall. So what will happen to the army this winter? And if we often go without food now, what will become of us in the spring when our numbers will be stronger, perhaps with the help of militia, aiming for an early campaign before the enemy can reinforce? These are critical considerations that deserve careful attention, and when my own reputation is so closely tied to the outcome, I must say that the current supply officers are definitely not up to the task, or that the people's dissatisfaction is beyond belief. Nonetheless, I believe the problem arises from both factors; and although I have been cautious in expressing opinions or complaints, since the changes in that department went against my judgment and I predicted the consequences, I must now speak plainly in defense of myself. Honestly, I can say that no one, in my view, has had their plans obstructed more than I have by every branch of the army. Since July, we have received no support from the quartermaster general; this lack of assistance has greatly contributed to the commissary general’s failures. Furthermore, despite a standing order (often reiterated) that troops should always carry two days' worth of supplies in case of sudden mobilization, almost every opportunity to exploit the enemy has been either completely blocked or significantly hindered because of this. And that is not the only major issue. We haven't seen soap, vinegar, or other supplies approved by Congress in a long time, I believe since the Battle of Brandywine. As for soap, we have little use for it; most men have only one shirt, many only half of one, and some have none at all. Additionally, to illustrate the little benefit from having a clothing officer, and further demonstrate the army's inability under these circumstances to carry out basic soldier duties, we found in a field report today that besides a large number of men stuck in hospitals due to lack of shoes and others in farmers' houses for the same reason, no fewer than two thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight men in camp are unfit for duty because they are barefoot and poorly clothed. The same report shows that our total number of continental troops, including the eastern brigades that joined us after General Burgoyne's surrender, excluding the Maryland troops sent to Wilmington, is only eight thousand two hundred in camp fit for duty. Despite this, since the fourth instant, our number of men fit for duty has decreased by nearly two thousand due to the hardships and exposure they’ve suffered, especially from the lack of blankets. Yet we have gentlemen criticizing the idea of going into winter quarters, without knowing whether the army actually was or not (since I certainly have not given any orders for a protest), as if they believed soldiers were made of wood or stone, equally unaffected by frost and snow; and moreover, as if they thought it would be easy for a smaller army, with the disadvantages I’ve described—not at all exaggerated—to contain a larger, well-equipped army during winter in Philadelphia and shield the states of Pennsylvania, Jersey, etc. from devastation. What makes this situation even more outrageous to me is that these same gentlemen, who clearly saw the soldiers' lack of clothing, thought their own troops were worse off than others, and advised me nearly a month ago to delay a plan I was about to implement based on a Congressional resolution to seize clothing, with strong promises that a sufficient supply would be gathered in ten days, according to the state’s decree; yet not one item has arrived. Still, they find a winter campaign and protecting their states from an enemy invasion to be so simple and manageable. I can assure those gentlemen that it’s much easier to write complaints in the comfort of a warm room than to endure the cold on a bleak hill and sleep under frost and snow without clothing or blankets. Nevertheless, even if they seem indifferent to the suffering of our naked and distressed soldiers, I deeply care for them, and I genuinely pity those hardships that I cannot alleviate or prevent."

The representations made in this letter were not exaggerated. The distresses of the army, however, so far as respected clothing, did not arise from the inattention of congress. Measures for the importation of clothes had been adopted early in the war, but had not produced the effect expected from them. Vigorous but ineffectual means had also been taken to obtain supplies from the interior. The unfortunate non-importation agreements which preceded the commencement of hostilities, had reduced the quantity of goods in the country below the ordinary amount, and the war had almost annihilated foreign commerce. The progress of manufactures did not equal the consumption; and such was the real scarcity, that exactions from individuals produced great distress, without relieving the wants of the army. A warm blanket was a luxury in which not many participated, either in the camp or in the country.

The claims made in this letter were not exaggerated. The struggles of the army, particularly regarding clothing, didn't result from Congress's lack of attention. Steps to import clothing had been taken early in the war, but they hadn’t produced the expected results. Despite efforts to obtain supplies from within the country, they were vigorous yet ineffective. The unfortunate non-importation agreements that came before the war started had lowered the amount of goods in the country below normal levels, and the war had nearly wiped out foreign trade. The growth of manufacturing couldn’t keep up with consumption; the scarcity was so real that demands on individuals caused significant hardship without addressing the army's needs. A warm blanket was a luxury few could afford, both in camp and in the country.

In the northern states, where the sea coast was too extensive, and the ports too numerous to be completely guarded, and where the people were more inclined to maritime enterprise, supplies both of arms and clothes were attainable in a more considerable degree than in those farther south; but the large sums of money expended in that part of the union for the support of the army, had lessened the value of the currency there more rapidly than elsewhere, and a consequent high nominal price was demanded for imported articles. Congress deemed the terms on which some large contracts had been made by the clothier general in Massachusetts, so exorbitant, as to forbid their execution; and at the same time, addressed a letter to the state government, requesting that the goods should be seized for the use of the army, at prices to be fixed by the legislature, in pursuance of a resolution of the 22d of November.

In the northern states, where the coastline was too long and the ports too many to protect completely, and where people were more focused on maritime business, supplies of weapons and clothing were more available than in the southern states. However, the large amounts of money spent in that part of the union to support the army had rapidly decreased the value of the currency there compared to other places, leading to a high nominal price for imported goods. Congress found the terms of some major contracts made by the clothier general in Massachusetts to be so unreasonable that they couldn’t be fulfilled. At the same time, Congress sent a letter to the state government asking that the goods be seized for the army, with prices to be set by the legislature, following a resolution from November 22nd.

These recommendations from congress, so far as they exhorted the states to supply the wants of the soldiers, were strongly supported by the General. In his letters to the several governors, he represented the very existence of the army, and the continuance of the contest, as depending on their exertions in this respect.

These recommendations from Congress, as far as they urged the states to meet the needs of the soldiers, were strongly backed by the General. In his letters to the various governors, he stressed that the survival of the army and the continuation of the struggle relied on their efforts in this regard.

1778
General Washington's exertions to increase his force, and to place it on a respectable footing before the ensuing campaign.

To recruit the army for the ensuing campaign became again an object of vital importance; and the Commander-in-chief again pressed its necessity on congress, and on the states. To obtain a respectable number of men by voluntary enlistment had, obviously, become impossible. Coercion could be employed only by the state governments; and it required all the influence of General Washington to induce the adoption of a measure so odious in itself, but so indispensable to the acquirement of means to meet the crisis of the war, which, in his judgment, had not yet passed away. He enclosed to each state a return of its troops on continental establishment, thereby exhibiting to each its own deficiency. To those who had not resorted to coercive means, he stated the success with which they had been used by others; and he urged all, by every motive which could operate on the human mind, to employ those means early enough to enable him to anticipate the enemy in taking the field.

To recruit the army for the upcoming campaign became critically important again; and the Commander-in-chief reiterated its necessity to Congress and the states. It was clear that obtaining a decent number of men through voluntary enlistment had become impossible. Coercion could only be used by state governments; and it took all of General Washington's influence to persuade them to adopt a measure that was so unpopular but vital for acquiring the resources needed to face the ongoing crisis of the war, which he believed had not yet passed. He sent each state a report of its troops on continental establishment, showing them their own shortcomings. To those who had not used coercive methods, he pointed out the success others had experienced by doing so; and he urged everyone, using every argument that could resonate with people, to adopt those measures quickly enough to allow him to outpace the enemy in taking the field.

To the causes which had long threatened the destruction of the army, the depreciation of paper money was now to be added. It had become so considerable that the pay of an officer would not procure even those absolute necessaries which might protect his person from the extremes of heat and cold. The few who possessed small patrimonial estates found them melting away; and others were unable to appear as gentlemen. Such circumstances could not fail to excite disgust with the service, and a disposition to leave it. Among those who offered their commissions to the Commander-in-chief, were many who, possessing a larger portion of military pride, and therefore feeling with peculiar sensibility the degradation connected with poverty and rags, afforded the fairest hopes of becoming the ornaments of the army. This general indifference about holding a commission; this general opinion that an obligation was conferred, not received by continuing in the service, could not fail to be unfavourable, not only to that spirit of emulation which stimulates to bolder deeds than are required, but to a complete execution of orders, and to a rigid observance of duty.

To the issues that had long threatened the army's survival, the decline in paper money now added to the problem. It had gotten so bad that an officer's pay couldn't even cover the basic essentials needed to protect them from extreme heat and cold. Those few who had small family estates saw their value shrink, while others struggled to present themselves as gentlemen. These conditions inevitably led to frustration with military service and a desire to leave. Among those who offered their commissions to the Commander-in-chief were many who had a strong sense of military pride, feeling particularly sensitive to the shame that came with poverty and tattered clothing, and they showed the greatest potential to be assets to the army. This widespread indifference towards holding a commission and the belief that staying in service was more of a burden than an honor could not help but harm not only the competitive spirit that drives people to achieve more than what is expected but also the proper execution of orders and strict adherence to duty.

An officer whose pride was in any degree wounded, whose caprice was not indulged, who apprehended censure for a fault which his carelessness about remaining in the army had probably seduced him to commit, was ready to throw up a commission which, instead of being valuable, was a burden almost too heavy to be borne. With extreme anxiety the Commander-in-chief watched the progress of a temper which, though just commencing, would increase, he feared, with the cause that produced it. He was, therefore, early and earnest in pressing the consideration of this important subject on the attention of congress.

An officer whose pride was hurt, whose whims weren’t catered to, and who feared criticism for a mistake that his negligence about staying in the army might have led him to make, was about to resign a commission that, instead of being valuable, felt like an almost unbearable burden. The Commander-in-chief watched with great concern as this temper began to develop, worried it would escalate along with the reasons behind it. He was, therefore, quick and sincere in urging Congress to pay attention to this important issue.

January 10.
Congress send a committee of their own body to the army.

The weak and broken condition of the continental regiments, the strong remonstrances of the General, the numerous complaints received from every quarter, determined congress to depute a committee to reside in camp during the winter, for the purpose of investigating the state of the army, and reporting such reforms as the public good might require.

The weak and broken state of the continental regiments, the strong objections of the General, and the many complaints received from various sources led Congress to assign a committee to stay in camp during the winter. Their goal was to look into the condition of the army and suggest reforms that the public good might need.

This committee repaired to head quarters in the month of January. The Commander-in-chief laid before them a general statement, taking a comprehensive view of the condition of the army, and detailing the remedies necessary for the correction of existing abuses, as well as those regulations which he deemed essential to its future prosperity.

This committee went to headquarters in January. The Commander-in-Chief presented them with a general overview, giving a broad perspective on the state of the army and outlining the necessary fixes for current issues, as well as the regulations he considered vital for its future success.

This paper, exhibiting the actual state of the army, discloses defects of real magnitude in the existing arrangements. In perusing it, the reader is struck with the numerous difficulties, in addition to those resulting from inferiority of numbers, with which the American general was under the necessity of contending. The memorial is too long to be inserted, but there are parts which ought not to be entirely overlooked. The neglect of the very serious representation it contained respecting a future permanent provision for the officers, threatened, at an after period, to be productive of such pernicious effects, that their insertion in this place will not, it is presumed, be unacceptable.

This paper, showing the current state of the army, reveals significant flaws in the existing arrangements. As you read it, you'll notice the many challenges, in addition to those from being outnumbered, that the American general had to face. The document is too lengthy to include in full, but there are sections that shouldn’t be ignored. The failure to address the serious concerns it raised about a future permanent provision for the officers later led to such harmful consequences that including them here is likely to be appreciated.

He recommended as the basis of every salutary reform, a comfortable provision for the officers, which should render their commissions valuable; to effect which the future, as well as the present, ought to be contemplated.

He suggested that every beneficial reform should start with a solid support system for the officers, making their positions worthwhile. To achieve this, we should consider both the future and the present.

"A long and continual sacrifice of individual interest for the general good, ought not," he said, "to be expected or required. The nature of man must be changed, before institutions built on the presumptive truth of such a principle can succeed.

"A long and ongoing sacrifice of personal interests for the common good shouldn't," he said, "be expected or demanded. Human nature has to change before institutions based on the assumed truth of such a principle can be successful."

"This position," he added, "is supported by the conduct of the officers of the American army, as well as by that of all other men. At the commencement of the dispute, in the first effusions of zeal, when it was believed the service would be temporary, they entered into it without regard to pecuniary considerations. But finding its duration much longer than had been at first expected, and that, instead of deriving advantage from the hardships and dangers to which they are exposed, they were, on the contrary, losers by their patriotism, and fell far short of even a competency for their wants, they have gradually abated in their ardour; and, with many, an entire disinclination to the service, under present circumstances, has taken place. To this, in an eminent degree, must be ascribed the frequent resignations daily happening, and the more frequent importunities for permission to resign, from some officers of the greatest merit.

"This position," he added, "is backed by the actions of the officers in the American army and by all other men involved. At the start of the conflict, in the initial surge of enthusiasm, when it was thought the service would be temporary, they joined in without thinking about financial rewards. But as the duration turned out to be much longer than expected, and instead of gaining something from the hardships and dangers they faced, they found themselves worse off because of their patriotism and not even able to meet their basic needs, their enthusiasm has gradually declined. For many, there’s now a complete reluctance to serve under the current circumstances. This has greatly contributed to the frequent resignations we see each day and the rising number of requests for permission to resign from some of our best officers."

"To this also may be ascribed the apathy, inattention, and neglect of duty, which pervade all ranks; and which will necessarily continue and increase, while an officer, instead of gaining any thing, is impoverished by his commission, and conceives he is conferring, not receiving a favour, in holding it. There can be no sufficient tie on men possessing such sentiments. Nor can any method be adopted to compel those to a punctual discharge of duty, who are indifferent about their continuance in the service, and are often seeking a pretext to disengage themselves from it. Punishment, in this case, would be unavailing. But when an officer's commission is made valuable to him, and he fears to lose it, you may exact obedience from him.

"To this, we can also attribute the apathy, inattention, and neglect of duty that exists at all levels; and this will likely continue and worsen as long as an officer feels that instead of gaining anything, they are losing out financially due to their commission and believes they are offering, not receiving, a favor by holding it. There’s no strong connection for people who have such feelings. You can't force those who don't care about staying in the service to perform their duties consistently, especially since they are often looking for a reason to leave. Punishment wouldn’t work in this situation. However, when an officer sees their commission as valuable and is afraid of losing it, you can expect their compliance."

"It is not indeed consistent with reason or justice that one set of men should make a sacrifice of property, domestic ease, and happiness; encounter the rigours of the field, the perils and vicissitudes of war, without some adequate compensation, to obtain those blessings which every citizen will enjoy in common with them. It must also be a comfortless reflection to any man, that, after he may have contributed to secure the rights of his country, at the risk of his life, and the ruin of his fortune, there will be no provision made to prevent himself and his family, from sinking into indigence and wretchedness." With these and other arguments, General Washington recommended, in addition to present compensation, a half pay and pensionary establishment for the army.

"It’s not reasonable or fair that one group of people should sacrifice their property, comfort, and happiness; face the harshness of the battlefield, the dangers, and uncertainties of war, without receiving adequate compensation, to secure the benefits that every citizen will enjoy alongside them. It must also be a disheartening thought for anyone that after risking their life and fortune to protect their country's rights, there’s no safety net to prevent them and their family from falling into poverty and misery." With these and other points, General Washington suggested, in addition to current pay, a half pay and pension plan for the army.

"I urge my sentiments," said he, "with the greater freedom, because I can not, and shall not, receive the smallest benefit from the establishment; and can have no other inducement for proposing it, than a full conviction of its utility and propriety."

"I express my feelings," he said, "more openly because I can't and won't gain anything from this establishment; my only motivation for suggesting it is my strong belief in its usefulness and appropriateness."

The wants and distresses of the army, when actually seen by the committee of congress, made a much deeper impression than could have been received from any statement whatever. They endeavoured to communicate to congress the sentiments felt by themselves, and to correct the errors which had been committed. But a numerous body, if it deliberate at all, proceeds slowly in the conduct of executive business; and will seldom afford a prompt corrective to existing mischiefs, especially to those growing out of its own measures.

The needs and struggles of the army, when witnessed by the congressional committee, left a much stronger impact than any report could have conveyed. They tried to share with Congress their feelings and fix the mistakes that had been made. However, a large group, if it takes time to think at all, moves slowly in handling executive tasks; and it's rare for them to quickly address the problems they’ve created themselves.

February 5.

Much of the sufferings of the army was attributed to mismanagement in the quartermaster's department, which, notwithstanding the repeated remonstrances of the Commander-in-chief, had long remained without a head. This subject was taken up early by the committee, and proper representations made respecting it. But congress still remained under the influence of those opinions which had already produced such mischievous effects, and were still disposed to retain the subordinate officers of the department in a state of immediate dependence on their own body. In this temper, they proposed a plan which, not being approved in camp, was never carried into execution.

Much of the army's suffering was due to mismanagement in the quartermaster's department, which, despite the Commander-in-chief's repeated complaints, had long been without a leader. The committee addressed this issue early on and made the necessary representations. However, Congress still adhered to the views that had already caused so much harm and was still inclined to keep the subordinate officers of the department directly dependent on them. In this mindset, they suggested a plan that, since it wasn't approved in camp, was never put into action.

While congress was deliberating on the reforms proposed, the distresses of the army approached their acme, and its dissolution was threatened. Early in February, the commissaries gave notice that the country, to a great distance, was actually exhausted; and that it would be impracticable to obtain supplies for the army longer than to the end of that month. Already the threatened scarcity began to be felt, and the rations issued were often bad in quality, and insufficient in quantity. General Washington found it necessary again to interpose his personal exertions to procure provisions from a distance.

While Congress was debating the proposed reforms, the army's struggles reached their peak, and its disbandment was at risk. In early February, the commissaries reported that the surrounding areas were nearly depleted, and it would be impossible to secure supplies for the army beyond the end of that month. The looming shortage was already being felt, with the rations provided often being poor in quality and insufficient in quantity. General Washington found it necessary to step in once more to secure provisions from afar.

In the apprehension that the resources of the commissary department would fail before the distant supplies he had taken measures to obtain could reach him, and that the enemy designed to make another incursion into the country around Philadelphia, for the purpose of gleaning what yet remained in possession of the inhabitants, he detached General Wayne, with orders to seize every article proper for the use of an army within fifteen miles of the Delaware, and to destroy the forage on the islands between Philadelphia and Chester.

In the concern that the supplies from the commissary department would run out before the distant shipments he had arranged could arrive, and that the enemy planned to make another attack on the area around Philadelphia to collect what was still available to the locals, he sent General Wayne with orders to capture every item suitable for army use within fifteen miles of the Delaware and to destroy the forage on the islands between Philadelphia and Chester.

To defeat the object of this foraging party, the inhabitants concealed their provisions and teams, and gave to the country every appearance of having been entirely pillaged. Before any sufficient aid could be obtained by these means, the bread, as well as the meat, was exhausted, and famine prevailed in camp.

To outsmart this foraging party, the locals hid their supplies and teams, making the area look completely looted. Before they could get enough help through this tactic, both the bread and meat ran out, and hunger took over the camp.

In an emergency so pressing, the Commander-in-chief used every effort to feed his hungry army. Parties were sent out to glean the country; officers of influence were deputed to Jersey, Delaware and Maryland; and circular letters were addressed to the governors of states by the committee of congress in camp and by the Commander-in-chief, describing the wants of the army, and urging the greatest exertions for its immediate relief.

In such a critical emergency, the Commander-in-chief made every effort to provide for his starving army. Teams were dispatched to gather resources from the surrounding areas; influential officers were assigned to Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland; and circular letters were sent to the governors of various states by the congressional committee in camp and by the Commander-in-chief, detailing the army's needs and urging significant efforts for its immediate support.

Fortunately for America, there were features in the character of Washington which, notwithstanding the discordant materials of which his army was composed, attached his officers and soldiers so strongly to his person, that no distress could weaken their affection, nor impair the respect and veneration in which they held him. To this sentiment is to be attributed, in a great measure, the preservation of a respectable military force, under circumstances but too well calculated for its dissolution.

Fortunately for America, there were aspects of Washington's character that, despite the differing backgrounds of his army, connected his officers and soldiers to him so strongly that no hardship could diminish their love for him or lessen the respect and admiration they had for him. This feeling largely explains the maintenance of a solid military force, even in conditions that were more than likely to lead to its breakdown.

Through this severe experiment on their fortitude, the native Americans persevered steadily in the performance of their duty; but the conduct of the Europeans, who constituted a large part of the army, was, to a considerable extent, less laudable; and at no period of the war was desertion so frequent as during this winter. Aided by the disaffected, deserters eluded the vigilance of the parties who watched the roads, and great numbers escaped into Philadelphia with their arms.

Through this tough test of their strength, the Native Americans consistently carried out their duties; however, the behavior of the Europeans, who made up a significant portion of the army, was largely less commendable. During this winter, desertion was more common than at any other time in the war. Supported by those who were unhappy with the situation, deserters managed to slip past the watchful eyes of the guards on the roads, and many made their way into Philadelphia with their weapons.

In a few days, the army was rescued from the famine with which it had been threatened, and considerable supplies of provisions were laid up in camp. It was perceived that the difficulties which had produced such melancholy effects, were created more by the want of due exertion in the commissary department, and by the efforts of the people to save their stock for a better market, than by any real deficiency of food in the country.

In a few days, the army was saved from the famine it had been facing, and ample supplies of food were stored in the camp. It became clear that the challenges causing such sad consequences were mainly due to a lack of proper effort in the commissary department and the people's attempts to reserve their stock for better prices, rather than any actual shortage of food in the country.

This severe demonstration seems to have convinced congress that their favourite system was radically vicious, and the subject was taken up with the serious intention of remodeling the commissary department on principles recommended by experience. But such were the delays inherent in the organization of that body, that the new system was not adopted until late in April.

This serious demonstration seems to have convinced Congress that their preferred system was fundamentally flawed, and the topic was addressed with the genuine intention of restructuring the commissary department based on insights gained from experience. However, due to the delays typical of that organization, the new system wasn’t implemented until late in April.

At no period of the war had the situation of the American army been more perilous than at Valley Forge. Even when the troops were not entirely destitute of food, their stock of provisions was so scanty that a quantity sufficient for one week was seldom in store. Consequently, had General Howe moved out in force, the American army could not have remained in camp; and their want of clothes disabled them from keeping the field in the winter. The returns of the first of February exhibit the astonishing number of three thousand nine hundred and eighty-nine men in camp, unfit for duty for want of clothes. Scarcely one man of these had a pair of shoes. Even among those returned capable of doing duty, many were so badly clad, that exposure to the cold of the season must have destroyed them. Although the total of the army exceeded seventeen thousand men, the present effective rank and file amounted to only five thousand and twelve.

At no time during the war had the situation of the American army been more dangerous than at Valley Forge. Even when the troops weren't completely out of food, their supplies were so limited that they rarely had enough for a week. Because of this, if General Howe had decided to attack, the American army wouldn't have been able to stay in camp; and their lack of proper clothing prevented them from staying in the field during winter. Reports from the beginning of February showed the shocking number of three thousand nine hundred eighty-nine men in camp, unable to serve due to lack of clothing. Almost none of them had a pair of shoes. Even among those reported as able to serve, many were so poorly dressed that exposure to the cold could have killed them. Although the total number of the army was over seventeen thousand men, the effective fighting force was only five thousand and twelve.

While the sufferings of the soldiers filled the hospitals, a dreadful mortality continued to prevail in those miserable receptacles of the sick. A violent putrid fever swept off much greater numbers than all the diseases of the camp.

While the soldiers' suffering overwhelmed the hospitals, a terrible death toll continued to haunt those grim places for the sick. A severe, contagious fever claimed many more lives than all the illnesses in the camp combined.

If then during the deep snow which covered the earth for a great part of the winter, the British general had taken the field, his own army would indeed have suffered greatly, but the American loss is not to be calculated.

If, during the heavy snowfall that blanketed the earth for much of the winter, the British general had gone into battle, his own army would have certainly suffered a lot, but the American losses would be unimaginable.

 

Washington's Headquarters at Valley Forge

Washington's Headquarters at Valley Forge

Washington's Headquarters at Valley Forge

Washington's HQ at Valley Forge

Here on December 17, 1777, after the Battles of Brandywine and Germantown and the occupation of Philadelphia by the British, Washington established his headquarters for what may be paradoxically termed the darkest winter of the Revolutionary War. The American Commander-in-Chief chose this place partly for its defensibility and partly to protect Congress, then in session at York, Pennsylvania, from a sudden British attack. It was here that Washington and Baron Steuben planned the reorganization of the American army, and it was here, May 1, 1778, that news reached Washington of the consummation of the French alliance.

Here on December 17, 1777, after the Battles of Brandywine and Germantown and the British takeover of Philadelphia, Washington set up his headquarters during what could ironically be called the darkest winter of the Revolutionary War. The American Commander-in-Chief chose this spot partly for its defensibility and partly to safeguard Congress, which was in session in York, Pennsylvania, from a sudden British attack. It was here that Washington and Baron Steuben planned the reorganization of the American army, and it was here, on May 1, 1778, that Washington received news of the completion of the French alliance.

 

Attempt to surprise Captain Lee's corps, and the gallant resistance made by him.
March 28.

Happily, the real condition of Washington was not well understood by Sir William Howe; and the characteristic attention of that officer to the lives and comfort of his troops, saved the American army. Fortunately, he confined his operations to those small excursions that were calculated to enlarge the comforts of his own soldiers, who, notwithstanding the favourable dispositions of the neighbouring country, were much distressed for fuel, and often in great want of forage and fresh provisions. The vigilance of the parties on the lines, especially on the south side of the Schuylkill, intercepted a large portion of the supplies intended for the Philadelphia market; and corporal punishment was frequently inflicted on those who were detected in attempting this infraction of the laws. As Captain Lee was particularly active, a plan was formed, late in January, to surprise and capture him in his quarters. An extensive circuit was made by a large body of cavalry, who seized four of his patrols without communicating an alarm. About break of day the British horse appeared; upon which Captain Lee placed his troopers that were in the house, at the doors and windows, who behaved so gallantly as to repulse the assailants without losing a horse or man. Only Lieutenant Lindsay and one private were wounded. The whole number in the house did not exceed ten.[99] That of the assailants was said to amount to two hundred. They lost a sergeant and three men with several horses, killed; and an officer and three men wounded.

Fortunately, the true situation of Washington wasn't well understood by Sir William Howe, and his careful consideration for the well-being of his troops ended up saving the American army. He limited his actions to small raids that aimed to improve the conditions for his soldiers, who, despite the favorable surroundings, were struggling to find fuel and often lacked forage and fresh food. The watchfulness of the patrols along the lines, especially on the south side of the Schuylkill, disrupted a significant amount of the supplies destined for the Philadelphia market, and corporal punishment was regularly imposed on those caught violating the laws. In late January, a plan was devised to surprise and capture Captain Lee in his quarters, given his notable activity. A large group of cavalry took a long route and captured four of his patrols without raising an alarm. Just before dawn, the British cavalry showed up, prompting Captain Lee to position his troops in the house at the doors and windows. They fought bravely, managing to fend off the attackers without losing a single horse or man. Only Lieutenant Lindsay and one private were wounded. There were no more than ten men inside the house. The attacking force was reported to be about two hundred. They lost a sergeant and three men, along with several horses, killed, and one officer and three men were wounded.

The result of this skirmish gave great pleasure to the Commander-in-chief, who had formed a high opinion of Lee's talents as a partisan. He mentioned the affair in his orders with strong marks of approbation; and, in a private letter to the captain, testified the satisfaction he felt. For his merit through the preceding campaign, congress promoted him to the rank of major, and gave him an independent partisan corps to consist of three troops of horse.

The outcome of this battle made the Commander-in-chief very happy, as he had a high regard for Lee's skills as a guerrilla fighter. He noted the incident in his orders with strong approval and expressed his satisfaction in a personal letter to the captain. For his achievements during the previous campaign, Congress promoted him to major and assigned him an independent guerrilla unit that included three cavalry troops.

Congress determine upon a second expedition against Canada.

While the deficiency of the public resources, arising from the alarming depreciation of the bills of credit, manifested itself in all the military departments, a plan was matured in congress, and in the board of war, without consulting the Commander-in-chief, for a second irruption into Canada. It was proposed to place the Marquis de Lafayette at the head of this expedition, and to employ Generals Conway and Starke, as the second and third in command.

While the lack of public resources, resulting from the drastic drop in the value of paper money, showed up in all the military departments, Congress and the board of war developed a plan for a second campaign into Canada without consulting the Commander-in-chief. It was suggested to put Marquis de Lafayette in charge of this expedition, with Generals Conway and Starke as the second and third in command.

This young nobleman, possessing an excellent heart, and all the military enthusiasm of his country, had left France early in 1777, in opposition to the will of his sovereign, to engage in the service of the United States. His high rank, and supposed influence at the court of Versailles, secured him the unlimited respect of his countrymen in America; and, added to his frankness of manners and zeal in their cause, recommended him strongly to congress. While the claims of others of the same country to rank were too exorbitant to be gratified, he demanded no station in the army; would consent to receive no compensation, and offered to serve as a volunteer. He had stipulated with Mr. Deane for the rank of major general without emolument; and, on his arrival in America, that rank was conferred on him, but without any immediate command. In that capacity, he sought for danger, and was wounded at the battle of Brandywine. He attached himself with the ardour of youth to the Commander-in-chief, who smoothed the way to his receiving a command in the army equal to his rank.

This young nobleman, with a great heart and all the military enthusiasm of his country, left France in early 1777 against his king's wishes to join the service of the United States. His high status and supposed influence at the court of Versailles earned him the unwavering respect of his fellow countrymen in America, and his friendly demeanor and passion for their cause made him particularly appealing to Congress. While other foreigners sought unreasonable ranks, he asked for no position in the army, refused any pay, and volunteered to serve. He had arranged with Mr. Deane to hold the rank of major general without salary, and upon his arrival in America, he was granted that rank, though he had no immediate command. In this role, he actively sought danger and was wounded at the Battle of Brandywine. He eagerly connected with the Commander-in-chief, who helped him get a command in the army that matched his rank.

The first intimation to General Washington that the expedition was contemplated, was given in a letter from the president of the board of war of the 24th of January, inclosing one of the same date to the Marquis, requiring the attendance of that nobleman on congress to receive his instructions. The Commander-in-chief was requested to furnish Colonel Hazen's regiment, chiefly composed of Canadians, for the expedition; and in the same letter, his advice and opinion were asked respecting it. The northern states were to furnish the necessary troops.

The first hint to General Washington that the expedition was being planned came in a letter from the president of the board of war dated January 24, which included a message to the Marquis, asking him to attend Congress to receive his instructions. The Commander-in-Chief was asked to provide Colonel Hazen's regiment, mostly made up of Canadians, for the expedition, and his thoughts and opinions on the matter were also requested in the same letter. The northern states were set to provide the necessary troops.

Without noticing the manner in which this business had been conducted, and the marked want of confidence it betrayed, General Washington ordered Hazen's regiment to march towards Albany; and the Marquis proceeded immediately to the seat of congress. At his request, he was to be considered as an officer detached from the army of Washington, to remain under his orders, and Major General the Baron de Kalb was added to the expedition; after which the Marquis repaired in person to Albany to take charge of the troops who were to assemble at that place in order to cross the lakes on the ice, and attack Montreal.

Without realizing how this operation had been carried out and the significant lack of trust it showed, General Washington ordered Hazen's regiment to march toward Albany. The Marquis then went straight to the seat of Congress. At his request, he was to be viewed as an officer assigned from Washington's army, to remain under his orders. Major General Baron de Kalb was added to the mission; after that, the Marquis personally went to Albany to oversee the troops that were gathering there to cross the lakes on the ice and launch an attack on Montreal.

Before its execution, it is abandoned.

On arriving at Albany, he found no preparations made for the expedition. Nothing which had been promised being in readiness, he abandoned the enterprise as impracticable. Some time afterward, congress also determined to relinquish it; and General Washington was authorized to recall both the Marquis de Lafayette, and the Baron de Kalb.

Upon arriving in Albany, he found that no preparations had been made for the expedition. Since nothing that had been promised was ready, he gave up on the venture as unfeasible. Some time later, Congress also decided to abandon it; and General Washington was authorized to summon both the Marquis de Lafayette and the Baron de Kalb back.

February 27.

While the army lay at Valley Forge, the Baron Steuben arrived in camp. This gentleman was a Prussian officer, who came to the United States with ample recommendations. He was said to have served many years in the armies of the great Frederick; to have been one of the aids de camp of that consummate commander; and to have held the rank of lieutenant general. He was, unquestionably, versed in the system of field exercise which the king of Prussia had introduced, and was well qualified to teach it to raw troops. He claimed no rank, and offered to render his services as a volunteer. After holding a conference with congress, he proceeded to Valley Forge.

While the army was stationed at Valley Forge, Baron Steuben arrived at the camp. This man was a Prussian officer who came to the United States with strong recommendations. He was said to have served many years in the armies of the great Frederick, to have been one of the aides-de-camp of that skilled commander, and to have held the rank of lieutenant general. He was definitely knowledgeable about the field training system that the king of Prussia had introduced and was well qualified to teach it to inexperienced troops. He didn’t claim any rank and offered to serve as a volunteer. After meeting with Congress, he went to Valley Forge.

General Conway resigns. Duel between him and General Cadwallader.

Although the office of inspector general had been bestowed on Conway, he had never entered on its duties; and his promotion to the rank of major general had given much umbrage to the brigadiers, who had been his seniors. That circumstance, in addition to the knowledge of his being in a faction hostile to the Commander-in-chief, rendered his situation in the army so uncomfortable, that he withdrew to York, in Pennsylvania, which was then the seat of congress. When the expedition to Canada was abandoned, he was not directed, with Lafayette and De Kalb, to rejoin the army. Entertaining no hope of being permitted to exercise the functions of his new office, he resigned his commission about the last of April, and, some time afterwards, returned to France.[100] The Baron Steuben appointed inspector general.On his resignation, the Baron Steuben, who had, as a volunteer, performed the duties of inspector general, much to the satisfaction of the Commander-in-chief, and of the army, was, on the recommendation of General Washington, appointed to that office with the rank of major general, without exciting the slightest murmur.

Although the position of inspector general was given to Conway, he never actually took on the responsibilities. His promotion to major general upset the brigadiers who were senior to him. This, combined with the fact that he was part of a group opposed to the Commander-in-chief, made his situation in the army so uncomfortable that he moved to York, Pennsylvania, where Congress was based at the time. When the mission to Canada was called off, he wasn't ordered to rejoin the army like Lafayette and De Kalb were. Having no hope of being allowed to fulfill the duties of his new role, he resigned his commission around the end of April and later returned to France.[100] Baron Steuben was appointed as the inspector general.After his resignation, the Baron Steuben, who had effectively performed the duties of inspector general as a volunteer to the satisfaction of the Commander-in-chief and the army, was appointed to that position with the rank of major general on General Washington's recommendation, without causing any complaints.

This gentleman was of real service to the American troops. He established one uniform system of field exercise; and, by his skill and persevering industry, effected important improvements through all ranks of the army during its continuance at Valley Forge.

This man was truly helpful to the American troops. He set up a single, consistent system of field training, and through his skill and hard work, made significant improvements across all levels of the army while they were stationed at Valley Forge.

1777

While it was encamped at that place, several matters of great interest engaged the attention of congress. Among them, was the stipulation in the convention of Saratoga for the return of the British army to England. Boston was named as the place of embarkation. At the time of the capitulation, the difficulty of making that port early in the winter was unknown to General Burgoyne. Consequently, as some time must elapse before a sufficient number of vessels for the transportation of his army could be collected, its embarkation might be delayed until the ensuing spring.

While it was camped at that location, several important issues caught the attention of Congress. One of these was the agreement made in the Saratoga convention regarding the return of the British army to England. Boston was designated as the embarkation point. At the time of the surrender, General Burgoyne was unaware of the challenges of reaching that port early in the winter. As a result, since it would take some time to gather enough ships to transport his army, their departure might be postponed until the following spring.

November 25.

On receiving this unwelcome intelligence, he applied to General Washington to change the port of embarkation, and to substitute Newport, in Rhode Island, or some place on the Sound, for Boston. If any considerations not foreseen should make this proposal objectionable, he then solicited this indulgence for himself and his suite. This request was communicated to congress, in terms favourable to that part of the application which respected General Burgoyne and his suite; but the objections to any change in the convention which might expedite the transportation of the army, were too weighty to be disregarded; and the General pressed them earnestly on congress. This precaution was unnecessary. The facility with which the convention might be violated by the British, and the captured army be united to that under General Howe, seems to have suggested itself to the American government, as soon as the first rejoicings were over; and such was its then existing temper, that the faith and honour of British officers were believed to be no securities against their appearing again in the field. Under this impression, a resolution had passed early in November, directing General Heath to transmit to the board of war a descriptive list of all persons comprehended in the convention, "in order that, if any officer, soldier, or other person of the said army should hereafter be found in arms against these states in North America, during the present contest, he might be convicted of the offence, and suffer the punishment in such case inflicted by the law of nations."

Upon receiving this unwelcome news, he reached out to General Washington to request a change in the port of departure, suggesting Newport, Rhode Island, or another location on the Sound instead of Boston. If there were any unforeseen issues with this proposal, he asked for leniency for himself and his entourage. This request was forwarded to Congress, favorably addressing the part related to General Burgoyne and his staff; however, the objections to altering the agreement in a way that would speed up the transportation of the army were too significant to ignore, and the General strongly urged Congress on this matter. This precaution turned out to be unnecessary. The ease with which the British could violate the agreement and reunite the captured army with General Howe's forces seemed to have occurred to the American government shortly after the initial celebrations ended; and given the prevailing mood at the time, it was believed that the faith and honor of British officers were not reliable guarantees against their return to the battlefield. With this mindset, a resolution was passed early in November instructing General Heath to send a detailed list of everyone included in the agreement to the board of war, "so that if any officer, soldier, or other member of that army were found fighting against these states in North America during the current conflict, he could be charged with the offense and face the punishment set forth by international law."

No other notice was taken of the application made by General Burgoyne to congress through the Commander-in-chief, than to pass a resolution "that General Washington be directed to inform General Burgoyne that congress will not receive, nor consider, any proposition for indulgence, nor for altering the terms of the convention of Saratoga, unless immediately directed to their own body."

No other action was taken regarding General Burgoyne's application to Congress through the Commander-in-chief, other than passing a resolution "that General Washington should inform General Burgoyne that Congress will not accept or consider any proposals for leniency or for changing the terms of the Saratoga convention unless they are directed to Congress itself."

December.

Contrary to expectation, a fleet of transports for the reception of the troops reached Rhode Island, on its way to Boston, in the month of December. But, before its arrival, the preconceived suspicions of congress had ripened into conviction several circumstances combined to produce this result. General Burgoyne, dissatisfied with the accommodations prepared for his officers in Boston, had, after a fruitless correspondence with General Heath, addressed a letter to General Gates, in which he complained of the inconvenient quarters assigned his officers, as a breach of the articles of the convention. This complaint was considered by congress as being made for the purpose of letting in the principle, that the breach of one article of a treaty discharges the injured party from its obligations.

Contrary to what was expected, a fleet of transport ships meant to bring troops arrived in Rhode Island, on its way to Boston, in December. However, by the time it got there, Congress's initial suspicions had solidified into certainty due to several factors. General Burgoyne, unhappy with the accommodations arranged for his officers in Boston, after unsuccessful discussions with General Heath, wrote a letter to General Gates. In it, he complained about the unsuitable quarters assigned to his officers, claiming it was a violation of the agreement. Congress viewed this complaint as an attempt to establish the idea that breaking one part of a treaty frees the affected party from their obligations.

This suspicion was strengthened by the indiscreet hesitation of General Burgoyne to permit the resolution requiring a descriptive list of his troops to be executed. His subsequent relinquishment of the objection did not remove the impression it had made.

This suspicion was fueled by General Burgoyne's obvious reluctance to let the resolution for a detailed list of his troops be carried out. His later decision to drop the objection didn't erase the impact it had.

It was also alleged, that the number of transports was not sufficient to convey the troops to Europe; nor was it believed possible that Sir William Howe could have laid in, so expeditiously, a sufficient stock of provisions for the voyage.

It was also claimed that there weren't enough transports to take the troops to Europe; nor did anyone think it was possible for Sir William Howe to have quickly stocked up on enough supplies for the trip.

These objections to the embarkation of Burgoyne's troops were strengthened by some trivial infractions of the convention, which, it was contended, gave congress a strict right to detain them. It was stipulated that "the arms" should be delivered up; and it appeared that several cartouch boxes and other military accoutrements, supposed to be comprehended in the technical term arms, had been detained. This was deemed an infraction of the letter of the compact, which, on rigid principle, justified the measures afterwards adopted by congress.

These objections to the deployment of Burgoyne's troops were strengthened by some minor violations of the agreement, which some argued gave Congress a clear right to hold them back. It was agreed that "the arms" should be surrendered; however, it turned out that several cartridge boxes and other military gear, believed to be included in the technical term arms, had been kept. This was considered a violation of the terms of the agreement, which, on strict principle, justified the actions later taken by Congress.

Congress forbid the embarkation of the British troops taken at Saratoga.

The whole subject was referred to a committee who reported all the circumstances of the case, whereupon congress came to several resolutions, enumerating the facts already mentioned, the last of which was in these words: "Resolved, therefore, that the embarkation of Lieutenant General Burgoyne, and the troops under his command, be suspended, until a distinct and explicit ratification of the convention of Saratoga shall be properly notified by the court of Great Britain to congress."

The entire issue was handed over to a committee that reported all the details of the situation, after which Congress came to several resolutions, listing the facts already discussed, the last of which said: "Resolved, therefore, that the departure of Lieutenant General Burgoyne and the troops under his command be put on hold until a clear and formal approval of the Saratoga convention is properly communicated by the court of Great Britain to Congress."

These resolutions, together with the report on which they were founded, were transmitted to the several states, and to General Washington. Two copies of them were sent to General Heath, with directions to deliver one of them to General Burgoyne, and with farther directions, "to order the vessels which may have arrived, or which shall arrive, for the transportation of the army under Lieutenant General Burgoyne, to quit, without delay, the port of Boston."

These resolutions, along with the report they were based on, were sent to the various states and to General Washington. Two copies were sent to General Heath, with instructions to give one of them to General Burgoyne, and further instructions "to have the vessels that may have arrived, or that will arrive, for transporting the army under Lieutenant General Burgoyne, leave the port of Boston immediately."

Burgoyne permitted to depart.

On receiving these resolutions, General Burgoyne addressed a letter to congress, containing papers, on which he founded a defence of his conduct, and insisted on the embarkation of his army, as stipulated in the convention; but the committee, to whom these papers were referred, reported their opinion, after the most attentive consideration of them, to be, "that nothing therein contained was sufficient to induce congress to recede from their resolves of the 8th of January last, respecting the convention of Saratoga." This application was accompanied by another letter from General Burgoyne, to be delivered if the army should still be detained, in which, in consideration of the state of his health, he solicited permission to return to England. This request was readily granted.

On receiving these resolutions, General Burgoyne sent a letter to Congress with documents to support his defense of his actions and insisted on the departure of his army, as promised in the agreement. However, the committee that reviewed these documents concluded, after careful consideration, that "nothing contained therein was enough to convince Congress to go back on their resolutions of January 8th regarding the Saratoga convention." This request was accompanied by another letter from General Burgoyne, meant to be delivered if the army was still being held, in which he asked to be allowed to return to England due to his health condition. This request was quickly approved.

The impression made on the British nation by the capitulation of Burgoyne, notwithstanding the persevering temper of the king, at length made its way into the cabinet, and produced resolutions in favour of pacific measures.

The impact of Burgoyne's surrender on the British nation, despite the king's stubbornness, eventually reached the cabinet and led to decisions in support of peaceful efforts.

1778
February.

After the rejection of repeated motions made by the opposition members tending to the abandonment of the American war, Lord North gave notice, in the House of Commons, that he had digested a plan of reconciliation which he designed shortly to lay before the house.

After the repeated motions by the opposition members to end the American war were rejected, Lord North announced in the House of Commons that he had come up with a plan for reconciliation that he intended to present to the house soon.

Plan of reconciliation with America agreed to in Parliament.

In conformity with this notice, he moved for leave to bring in, "first, A bill for removing all doubts and apprehensions concerning taxation by the Parliament of Great Britain in any of the colonies and plantations of North America.

In line with this notice, he requested permission to introduce, "first, A bill to clear up any doubts and concerns about taxation by the Parliament of Great Britain in any of the colonies and plantations of North America.

"Second. A bill to enable his Majesty to appoint commissioners with sufficient powers to treat, consult, and agree upon the means of quieting the disorders now subsisting in certain of the colonies of North America."

"Second. A bill to allow the King to appoint commissioners with enough authority to discuss, consult, and agree on ways to resolve the ongoing issues in certain colonies of North America."

The first contained a declaration that Parliament will impose no tax or duty whatever payable within any of the colonies of North America, except only such duties as it may be expedient to impose for the purposes of commerce, the net produce of which should always be paid and applied to and for the use of the colonies in which the same shall be respectively levied, in like manner as other duties collected under the authority of their respective legislatures are ordinarily paid and applied.

The first declared that Parliament will not impose any taxes or duties in any of the North American colonies, except for those duties that it finds necessary for trade, the revenue from which will always be paid and used for the benefit of the colonies where they are collected, just like other duties collected under the authority of their own legislatures are typically handled.

The second authorized the appointment of commissioners by the crown, with power to treat either with the existing governments, or with individuals, in America; provided that no stipulations which might be entered into should have any effect until approved in Parliament, other than is afterward mentioned.

The second allowed the crown to appoint commissioners who could negotiate with either the current governments or individuals in America; however, any agreements made wouldn’t take effect until approved by Parliament, except for what is mentioned later.

It is then enacted, that the commissioners may have power "to proclaim a cessation of hostilities in any of the colonies, to suspend the operation of the non-intercourse law; and farther, to suspend, during the continuance of the act, so much of all or any of the acts of Parliament which have passed since the 10th day of February, 1763, as relates to the colonies.

It is then established that the commissioners may have the authority "to declare a halt to hostilities in any of the colonies, to put the non-intercourse law on hold; and furthermore, to suspend, for the duration of the act, any part of the acts of Parliament that have been passed since February 10, 1763, that pertains to the colonies."

"To grant pardon to any number or description of persons, and to appoint a governor in any colony in which his majesty had heretofore exercised the power of making such appointments."

"To give a pardon to any group of people or individuals and to appoint a governor in any colony where his majesty had previously held the authority to make such appointments."

These bills passed both houses of Parliament with inconsiderable opposition.

These bills passed both houses of Parliament with little opposition.

Intelligence of the treaty between the United States and France having been received by the minister about the time of their being introduced, copies of them, before they had gone through the requisite forms, were hurried to America, to be laid before congress and the public, in the hope and expectation that they might counteract the effects which it was feared the treaty with France would produce.

Intelligence about the treaty between the United States and France was received by the minister around the time they were introduced. Copies of the treaty, before they had completed the necessary procedures, were rushed to America to be presented to Congress and the public, hoping to counteract the potential negative effects that the treaty with France might cause.

April.

General Washington received early information of their arrival, and entertained serious fears of their operation. He was apprehensive that the publication of a proposition for the restoration of peace on the terms originally required by America, would greatly increase the numbers of the disaffected; and immediately forwarded the bills to congress in a letter suggesting the policy of preventing their pernicious influence on the public mind by all possible means, and especially through the medium of the press.

General Washington got early news about their arrival and was seriously worried about their actions. He feared that announcing a proposal for restoring peace based on the original terms requested by America would significantly increase the number of people who were unhappy. He quickly sent the bills to Congress in a letter recommending that they try to counteract their harmful influence on public opinion by any means possible, especially through the media.

Communicated to, and rejected by Congress.
April 22.

This letter was referred to a committee, consisting of Messrs. Morris, Drayton, and Dana, by whom a report was made, investigating the bills with great acuteness as well as asperity. This report, and the resolutions upon it, were ordered to be published. Other resolutions were passed the succeeding day, recommending it to the states to pardon under such limitations as they might think proper to make, such of their misguided fellow-citizens as had levied war against the United States.

This letter was sent to a committee made up of Messrs. Morris, Drayton, and Dana, who created a report that examined the bills with both sharp insight and harsh criticism. This report, along with the resolutions based on it, was ordered to be published. The next day, additional resolutions were passed, recommending that the states consider pardoning, with any conditions they deemed appropriate, those misguided fellow citizens who had taken up arms against the United States.

This resolution was accompanied by an order directing it to be printed in English and in German, and requesting General Washington to take such measures as he should deem most effectual for circulating the copies among the American recruits in the enemy's army.[101]

This resolution came with an order to have it printed in both English and German, and it asked General Washington to take whatever steps he thought would be most effective in getting copies to American recruits in the enemy's army.[101]

During these transactions, the frigate La Sensible arrived with the important intelligence that treaties of alliance and of commerce, had been formed between the United States of America and France. The treaties themselves were brought by Mr. Simeon Deane, the brother of the American Minister in Paris.

During these dealings, the frigate La Sensible arrived with crucial news that alliances and trade agreements had been established between the United States of America and France. The treaties were delivered by Mr. Simeon Deane, the brother of the American Minister in Paris.

This event had long been anxiously expected, and the delay attending it had been such as to excite serious apprehension that it would never take place.

This event had been eagerly anticipated for a long time, and the delay had raised serious concerns that it might never happen.

France was still extremely sore under the wounds inflicted during the war which terminated in 1763. It was impossible to reflect on a treaty which had wrested from her so fair a part of North America, without feeling resentments which would seek the first occasion of gratification.

France was still very hurt from the wounds inflicted during the war that ended in 1763. It was impossible to think about a treaty that had taken away such a large part of North America without feeling resentments that would look for the first chance to be satisfied.

The growing discontents between Great Britain and her colonies were, consequently, viewed at a distance with secret satisfaction; but rather as a circumstance which might have some tendency to weaken and embarrass a rival, and which was to be encouraged from motives of general policy, than as one from which any definite advantage was to be derived. France appears, at that time, to have required, and wished for, repose. The great exertions of the preceding disastrous war had so deranged her finances, that the wish to preserve peace seems to have predominated in her cabinet. The young monarch, who had just ascended the throne, possessed a pacific unambitious temper, and the councils of the nation were governed by men alike indisposed to disturb the general tranquillity. The advice they gave the monarch was, to aid and encourage the colonies secretly, in order to prevent a reconciliation with the mother country, and to prepare privately for hostilities, by improving his finances, and strengthening his marine; but to avoid every thing which might give occasion for open war. The system which for a time regulated the cabinet of Versailles, conformed to this advice. While the utmost attention was paid to the Minister of Britain, and every measure to satisfy him was openly taken, intimation was privately given to those of the United States, that these measures were necessary for the present, but they might be assured of the good will of the French government.

The growing tensions between Great Britain and its colonies were looked at from a distance with secret satisfaction; not so much as a situation to gain any clear advantage from, but rather as a chance to weaken and confuse a rival, which was something to be encouraged for general political reasons. At that time, France seemed to want and need peace. The heavy toll from the previous disastrous war had messed up its finances to the point where the desire to maintain peace was the top priority in the French cabinet. The young king, who had just taken the throne, had a peaceful, unambitious nature, and the country's leaders were similarly disinclined to disrupt the overall calm. They advised the king to secretly support the colonies to prevent their reconciliation with Britain, and to quietly prepare for potential conflict by boosting the economy and strengthening the navy, all while avoiding anything that might lead to outright war. For a time, this strategy guided the cabinet in Versailles. While they paid great attention to the British Minister and took every public measure to keep him satisfied, they quietly let those in the United States know that these actions were necessary for now, but that they could trust in the goodwill of the French government.

During the public demonstration of dispositions favourable to England, means were taken to furnish aids of ammunition and arms, and to facilitate the negotiation of loans to the United States; and the owners of American privateers, though forbidden to sell their prizes, or to procure their condemnation, found means to dispose of them privately.

During the public demonstration of support for England, efforts were made to provide ammunition and weapons and to help negotiate loans to the United States. The owners of American privateers, despite being prohibited from selling their captured ships or seeking their condemnation, found ways to sell them privately.

Meanwhile, another party was formed in the cabinet, to whose political system subsequent events gave the ascendency. Its avowed object was to seize the present moment to revenge past injuries, humble the haughty rival of France, and dismember her empire.

Meanwhile, another faction was formed in the cabinet, which later events gave the upper hand. Its stated goal was to take advantage of the current situation to avenge past wrongs, bring down the arrogant rival of France, and break apart her empire.

Matters remained in a fluctuating state until December, 1777. Privately encouraged, but discountenanced publicly, the prospects of the American Ministers varied according to the complexion of American affairs.

Matters stayed in a state of flux until December 1777. Privately supported, but publicly dismissed, the prospects of the American Ministers changed with the ups and downs of American affairs.

Intelligence of the convention of Saratoga reached France early in December, 1777. The American deputies took that opportunity to press the treaty which had been under consideration for the preceding twelve months; and to urge the importance, at this juncture, when Britain would, most probably, make proposals for an accommodation,[102] of communicating to congress, precisely, what was to be expected from France and Spain.

The news about the Saratoga convention reached France in early December 1777. The American representatives used this chance to push for the treaty that had been discussed for the past year, emphasizing the importance of this moment, especially since Britain would likely make peace proposals soon, [102] and to inform Congress exactly what to expect from France and Spain.

They were informed by M. Girard, one of the secretaries of the king's council of state, that it was determined to acknowledge the independence of the United States, and to make a treaty with them. That his Most Christian Majesty was resolved not only to acknowledge, but to support their independence. That in doing this, he might probably soon be engaged in a war; yet he should not expect any compensation from the United States on that account; nor was it pretended that he acted wholly for their sakes; since, besides his real good will to them, it was manifestly the interest of France that the power of England should be diminished by the separation of her colonies. The only condition he should require would be that the United States, in no peace to be made, should give up their independence, and return to their obedience to the British government.

They were informed by M. Girard, one of the secretaries of the king's council of state, that it was decided to recognize the independence of the United States and to form a treaty with them. His Most Christian Majesty was determined not only to acknowledge but to support their independence. In doing this, he might soon find himself in a war; however, he did not expect any compensation from the United States for that reason, nor did he claim that he was acting solely for their benefit, as, in addition to his genuine goodwill towards them, it was clearly in France's interest to weaken England by separating its colonies. The only condition he would require is that the United States, in any peace agreement made, would not give up their independence and return to being governed by the British.

On determining to take this decisive course, the cabinet of Versailles had despatched a courier to his Catholic majesty with information of the line of conduct about to be pursued by France. On his return, the negotiation was taken up in earnest, and a treaty of friendship and commerce was soon concluded. This was accompanied by a treaty of alliance eventual and defensive between the two nations, in which it was declared, that if war should break out between France and England during the existence of that with the United States, it should be made a common cause; and that neither of the contracting parties should conclude either truce or peace with Great Britain without the formal consent of the other, first obtained; and they mutually engaged "not to lay down their arms until the independence of the United States shall have been formally, or tacitly assured by the treaty, or treaties that shall terminate the war."

Upon deciding to take this decisive step, the cabinet of Versailles sent a messenger to his Catholic Majesty to inform him about the course of action France was about to take. On his return, negotiations were taken seriously, and a friendship and commerce treaty was quickly established. This was accompanied by a treaty of eventual and defensive alliance between the two nations, which stated that if war broke out between France and England while the conflict with the United States was ongoing, it would be treated as a common cause. Neither party could reach a truce or peace with Great Britain without first obtaining the other party's formal consent, and they both committed "not to lay down their arms until the independence of the United States has been formally, or tacitly assured by the treaty, or treaties that shall end the war."

It was the wish of the ministers of the United States to engage France immediately in the war; and to make the alliance, not eventual, but positive. This proposition, however, was rejected.

It was the desire of the U.S. ministers to get France involved in the war right away and to make the alliance not just a possibility, but definite. This proposal, however, was turned down.

In a few weeks after the conclusion of these negotiations, the Marquis de Noailles announced officially to the court of London, the treaty of friendship and commerce France had formed with the United States. The British government, considering this notification as a declaration of war, published a memorial for the purpose of justifying to all Europe the hostilities it had determined to commence.

In a few weeks after the end of these negotiations, the Marquis de Noailles officially announced to the court of London the treaty of friendship and commerce that France had made with the United States. The British government viewed this announcement as a declaration of war and published a statement to justify the hostilities it had decided to initiate to all of Europe.

Soon after their commencement, the Count de Vergennes received private intelligence that it was contemplated in the cabinet of London to offer to the United States an acknowledgment of their independence as the condition of a separate peace. He immediately communicated this intelligence to the American ministers, requesting them to lose no time in stating to congress that, though war was not declared in form, it had commenced in fact; and that he considered the obligations of the treaty of alliance as in full force; consequently that neither party was now at liberty to make a separate peace. Instructions of a similar import were given to the minister of France in the United States.

Soon after their start, Count de Vergennes received private information that the London cabinet was considering offering the United States an acknowledgment of their independence as a condition for a separate peace. He quickly shared this information with the American ministers, urging them to inform Congress that, although war hadn’t been officially declared, it had already begun in reality; and that he believed the commitments of the treaty of alliance were still fully in effect; therefore, neither side was currently allowed to make a separate peace. Similar instructions were given to the French minister in the United States.

Information received of treaties of alliance and commerce being entered into between France and the United States.

The despatches containing these treaties were received by the president on Saturday the second of May, after congress had adjourned. That body was immediately convened, the despatches were opened, and their joyful contents communicated.

The messages with these treaties arrived for the president on Saturday, May 2nd, after Congress had ended its session. The assembly was quickly gathered again, the messages were opened, and their exciting contents were shared.

In the exultation of the moment, the treaty of alliance, as well as that of commerce and friendship was published; a circumstance which, not without reason, gave umbrage to the cabinet of Versailles; because that treaty, being only eventual, ought not to have been communicated to the public but by mutual consent.

In the excitement of the moment, the alliance treaty, along with the one for trade and friendship, was announced; a fact that, understandably, upset the cabinet of Versailles because that treaty, being temporary, should only have been made public with mutual agreement.

From this event, which was the source of universal exultation to the friends of the revolution, the attention must be directed to one which was productive of very different sensations.

From this event, which brought immense joy to the supporters of the revolution, we must now focus on one that caused very different feelings.

Among the various improvements which struggling humanity has gradually engrafted on the belligerent code, none have contributed more to diminish the calamities of war, than those which meliorate the condition of prisoners. No obligations will be more respected by the generous and the brave; nor are there any, the violation of which could wound the national character more deeply, or expose it to more lasting or better merited reproach.

Among the various improvements that humanity has slowly made to the laws of war, none have done more to lessen the suffering caused by conflict than those that improve the treatment of prisoners. No commitments will be more respected by the noble and courageous; nor are there any violations that could hurt a nation's reputation more profoundly or subject it to more enduring and well-deserved criticism.

In wars between nations nearly equal in power, and possessing rights acknowledged to be equal, a departure from modern usage in this respect is almost unknown; and the voice of the civilized world would be raised against the potentate who could adopt a system calculated to re-establish the rigours and misery of exploded barbarism. But in contests between different parts of the same empire, those practices which mitigate the horrors of war yield, too frequently, to the calculations of a blind and erring resentment. The party which supports the ancient state of things, often treats resistance as rebellion, and captives as traitors. The opposite party, supporting also by the sword principles believed to be right, will admit of no departure from established usage, to its prejudice; and may be expected, if possessing the power, to endeavour, by retaliating injuries, to compel the observance of a more just and humane system. But they participate in the fault imputable to their adversaries, by manifesting a disposition to punish those whom they deem traitors, with the same severity of which they so loudly and justly complain, when they are themselves its victims.

In wars between nations that are nearly equal in power and recognized rights, straying from modern practices is almost unheard of; the civilized world would condemn any leader who chose a system that would bring back the harshness and suffering of outdated barbarism. However, in conflicts within the same empire, the practices that help reduce the horrors of war often fall victim to blind and misguided resentment. The side that supports the old order frequently views resistance as rebellion and captives as traitors. The opposing side, defending principles they believe are just, will not allow any changes to established practices if it harms them; if they have the power, they will likely seek to impose a fairer and more humane system through retaliatory actions. Yet, they share the same fault as their enemies by showing a willingness to punish those they label as traitors with the same harshness they rightfully criticize when they are on the receiving end.

General Gage, as Commander-in-chief of the British army, in the harshness of spirit which had been excited while governor of Massachusetts, not only threw all his prisoners into a common jail, but rejected every proposition for an exchange of them. When the command devolved on Sir William Howe, this absurd system was abandoned, and an exchange[103] took place to a considerable extent. But the Americans had not made a sufficient number of prisoners to relieve all their citizens, and many of them still remained in confinement. Representations were continually received from these unfortunate men, describing in strong terms, the severity of their treatment. They complained of suffering almost the extremity of famine, that even the supply of provisions allowed them was unsound, and that they were crowded into prison-ships, where they became the victims of disease.

General Gage, as the Commander-in-chief of the British army, driven by the harsh attitude he had developed while governing Massachusetts, not only confined all his prisoners in a single jail but also turned down every proposal for exchanging them. When command passed to Sir William Howe, this ridiculous approach was dropped, and a significant exchange[103] occurred. However, the Americans had not captured enough prisoners to free all their citizens, leaving many still in captivity. Constant reports were received from these unfortunate individuals, vividly detailing the severity of their treatment. They reported suffering nearly from starvation, noting that the food supply they did receive was rotten, and that they were crammed into prison ships, where they fell victim to disease.

When charged with conduct so unworthy of his character and station, Sir William Howe positively denied its truth.

When accused of behavior so unworthy of his character and position, Sir William Howe firmly denied it.

It would be unjust to ascribe this excess of inhumanity to an officer who, though perhaps severe in his temper, did not mingle cruelties in his general system, which would excite universal indignation in other wars. It must be admitted that his supplies of provisions were neither good nor abundant; and that the American soldiers, in their own camp, were unhealthy. But the excessive mortality prevailing among the prisoners can be accounted for on no ordinary principles; and the candid, who were least inclined to criminate without cause, have ever been persuaded that, if his orders did not produce the distress which existed, his authority was not interposed with sufficient energy, to correct the abuses which prevailed.

It would be unfair to blame this extreme cruelty on an officer who, while maybe harsh in his attitude, didn’t include brutalities in his overall approach that would cause widespread outrage in other conflicts. It must be acknowledged that his food supplies were neither good nor plentiful, and that the American soldiers in their own camp were in poor health. However, the high death rate among the prisoners cannot be explained by normal factors; even those who are fair-minded and least likely to assign blame without reason have generally believed that, while his orders might not have caused the suffering that was happening, he also didn’t use his authority strongly enough to fix the issues that were occurring.

The capture of General Lee furnished an additional ground of controversy on the subject of prisoners. As he had been an officer in the British service, whose resignation had not, perhaps, been received when he entered into that of America, a disposition was, at first, manifested to consider him as a deserter, and he was closely confined. On receiving information of this circumstance, congress directed General Howe to be assured that Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, and five Hessian field-officers, should be detained, and should experience precisely the fate of General Lee. These officers were taken into close custody, and informed that the resolution announced to General Howe should be strictly enforced.

The capture of General Lee added more fuel to the ongoing debate about prisoners. Since he had previously been an officer in the British military and his resignation may not have been processed when he joined the American side, there was an initial tendency to view him as a deserter, leading to his strict confinement. After learning about this situation, Congress instructed General Howe to be informed that Lieutenant Colonel Campbell and five Hessian field officers would be held and would face the same treatment as General Lee. These officers were taken into close custody and told that the directive given to General Howe would be strictly followed.

The sentiments of the Commander-in-chief on the subject of retaliation, seem to have been less severe than those of congress. So great was his abhorrence of the cruelties such a practice must generate, that he was unwilling to adopt it in any case not of absolute and apparent necessity. Not believing that of General Lee to be such a case, he remonstrated strongly against these resolutions. But congress remained inflexible; and the officers designated as the objects of retaliation, were kept in rigorous confinement until General Lee was declared to be a prisoner of war.[104]

The Commander-in-chief's views on retaliation seemed to be less harsh than those of Congress. He was so appalled by the cruelty that such actions would lead to that he was hesitant to use it unless it was clearly necessary. Not believing General Lee's situation warranted that, he strongly opposed these resolutions. But Congress refused to change their stance, and the officers chosen for retaliation were kept in strict confinement until General Lee was officially recognized as a prisoner of war.[104]

The resolutions of congress respecting the prisoners taken at the Cedars, were also the source of much embarrassment and chagrin to the Commander-in-chief. Alleging that the capitulation had been violated on the part of the enemy, and that the savages had been permitted to murder some of the prisoners, and to plunder others, they withheld their sanction from the agreement entered into by General Arnold with Captain Forster, and refused to allow other prisoners to be returned in exchange for those liberated under that agreement, until the murderers should be given up, and compensation made for the baggage said to have been plundered. As the fact alleged was not clearly established, Sir William Howe continued to press General Washington on this subject. Reminding him of the importance of a punctilious observance of faith, plighted in engagements like that made by General Arnold, he persisted to hold the Commander-in-chief personally bound for an honourable compliance with military stipulations entered into by an officer under his authority.

The resolutions from Congress regarding the prisoners taken at the Cedars caused a lot of trouble and frustration for the Commander-in-chief. They argued that the enemy had broken the terms of surrender and that the natives had been allowed to kill some of the prisoners and steal from others. Because of this, they refused to approve the agreement made by General Arnold with Captain Forster and wouldn't allow other prisoners to be exchanged for those released under that agreement until the murderers were handed over and compensation was made for the stolen belongings. Since the claim wasn't clearly proven, Sir William Howe kept urging General Washington about this matter. He reminded him of the importance of strictly adhering to commitments made in agreements like the one General Arnold had made, insisting that the Commander-in-chief was personally responsible for ensuring that military agreements made by his officer were honored.

General Washington, feeling the keenness of the reproach, pressed congress to change their resolution on this subject; but his remonstrances were, for a long time, unavailing.

General Washington, feeling the sting of the criticism, urged Congress to change their decision on this issue; however, his protests were fruitless for a long time.

After the sufferings of the prisoners in New York had been extreme, and great numbers had perished in confinement, the survivors were liberated for the purpose of being exchanged; but so miserable was their condition, that many of them died on their way home. For the dead as well as the living, General Howe claimed a return of prisoners, while General Washington contended that reasonable deductions should be made for those who were actually dead, of diseases under which they laboured when permitted to leave the British prisons.

After the extreme suffering of the prisoners in New York, where many died in captivity, the survivors were freed to be exchanged. However, their condition was so dire that many of them died on the way home. General Howe requested the return of both the dead and the living prisoners, while General Washington argued that reasonable deductions should be made for those who were actually dead from the diseases they had while still in British prisons.

Until this claim should be admitted, General Howe rejected any partial exchange. General Washington was immoveable in his determination to repel it; and thus all hope of being relieved in the ordinary mode appeared to be taken from those whom the fortune of war had placed in the power of the enemy.

Until this claim was accepted, General Howe refused any partial exchange. General Washington was resolute in his decision to refuse it; as a result, all hope of being rescued in the usual way seemed to be taken away from those whom the fortune of war had put in the hands of the enemy.

Complaints made by General Washington of the treatment of American prisoners in possession of the enemy.

In the mean time, the sufferings of the American prisoners increased with the increasing severity of the season. Information continued to be received, that they suffered almost the extremity of famine. Repeated remonstrances, made on this subject to the British general, were answered by a denial of the fact. He continued to aver that the same food, both in quantity and quality, was issued to the prisoners, as to British troops when in transports, or elsewhere, not on actual duty; and that every tenderness was extended to them, which was compatible with the situation of his army. He yielded to the request made by General Washington to permit a commissary to visit the jails, and demanded passports for an agent to administer to the wants of British prisoners.

In the meantime, the hardships faced by American prisoners worsened with the harshness of the season. Reports kept coming in that they were suffering nearly from starvation. Repeated complaints about this to the British general were met with denial. He insisted that the same amount and quality of food were given to the prisoners as to British troops when they were in transports or not on active duty, and that they were treated with all the kindness possible given the circumstances of his army. He agreed to General Washington's request to allow a commissary to visit the jails and asked for passports for an agent to help address the needs of British prisoners.

When Mr. Boudinot, the American commissary of prisoners, who was appointed by General Washington to visit the jails in Philadelphia, met Mr. Ferguson, the British commissary, he was informed that General Howe thought it unnecessary for him to come into the city, as he would himself inspect the situation and treatment of the prisoners. There is reason to believe that their causes of complaint, so far as respected provisions, did not exist afterwards in the same degree as formerly; and that the strong measures subsequently taken by congress, were founded on facts of an earlier date.

When Mr. Boudinot, the American prisoner commissary appointed by General Washington to visit the jails in Philadelphia, met Mr. Ferguson, the British commissary, he learned that General Howe felt it was unnecessary for him to enter the city, as he would personally check on the conditions and treatment of the prisoners. There's reason to believe that their complaints regarding provisions were not as severe later on as they had been before; and that the strict actions taken by Congress afterwards were based on earlier facts.

But clothes and blankets were also necessary, and the difficulty of furnishing them was considerable. General Howe would not permit the purchase of those articles in Philadelphia; and they were not attainable elsewhere.

But clothes and blankets were also essential, and getting them was quite challenging. General Howe wouldn't allow the purchase of those items in Philadelphia, and they weren't available anywhere else.

Proceedings of congress on this subject.

To compel him to abandon this distressing restriction, and to permit the use of paper money within the British lines, congress resolved, that no prisoner should be exchanged until all the expenditures made in paper for the supplies they received from the United States, should be repaid in specie, at the rate of four shillings and sixpence for each dollar. They afterwards determined, that from the 1st day of February, no British commissary should be permitted to purchase any provisions for the use of prisoners west of New Jersey, but that all supplies for persons of that description should be furnished from British stores.

To pressure him to lift this painful restriction and allow the use of paper money within the British lines, Congress decided that no prisoner would be exchanged until all expenses incurred in paper for the supplies they received from the United States were repaid in hard currency, at the rate of four shillings and sixpence for each dollar. They later resolved that starting February 1st, no British commissary would be allowed to buy any food for prisoners west of New Jersey, and that all supplies for those individuals should come from British stores.

Sir William Howe remonstrated against the last resolution with great strength and justice, as a decree which doomed a considerable number of prisoners, far removed into the country, to a slow and painful death by famine; since it was impracticable to supply them immediately from Philadelphia. The severity of this order was in some degree mitigated by a resolution that each British commissary of prisoners should receive provisions from the American commissary of purchases, to be paid for in specie, according to the resolution of the 19th of December, 1777.

Sir William Howe strongly argued against the last resolution, pointing out that it sentenced a significant number of prisoners, far away in the countryside, to a slow and painful death by starvation, as it was impractical to provide them immediate supplies from Philadelphia. The harshness of this order was somewhat softened by a resolution stating that each British commissary of prisoners would receive provisions from the American commissary of purchases, to be paid for in cash, according to the resolution from December 19, 1777.

About the same time, an order was hastily given by the board of war, which produced no inconsiderable degree of embarrassment; and exposed the Commander-in-chief to strictures not less severe than those he had applied to the British general.

About the same time, the board of war quickly issued an order that caused a significant amount of confusion and put the Commander-in-chief under criticism that was just as harsh as what he had directed at the British general.

General Washington had consented that a quartermaster, with a small escort, should come out of Philadelphia, with clothes and other comforts for the prisoners who were in possession of the United States. He had expressly stipulated for their security, and had given them a passport.

General Washington had agreed that a quartermaster, along with a small escort, should come out of Philadelphia with clothes and other supplies for the prisoners held by the United States. He had specifically ensured their safety and had provided them with a passport.

January 26.

While they were travelling through the country, information was given to the board of war that General Howe had refused to permit provisions to be sent in to the American prisoners in Philadelphia by water. This information was not correct. General Howe had only requested that flags should not be sent up or down the river without previous permission obtained from himself. On this information, however, the board ordered Lieutenant Colonel Smith immediately to seize the officers, though protected by the passport of General Washington, their horses, carriages, and the provisions destined for the relief of the British prisoners; and to secure them until farther orders, either from the board or from the Commander-in-chief.

While they were traveling through the countryside, the board of war received information that General Howe had refused to allow provisions to be sent to the American prisoners in Philadelphia by water. This information was incorrect. General Howe had only asked that flags not be sent up or down the river without first getting permission from him. Based on this information, the board ordered Lieutenant Colonel Smith to immediately seize the officers, even though they were protected by General Washington's passport, along with their horses, carriages, and the provisions meant for the British prisoners; and to hold them until further orders from either the board or the Commander-in-chief.

General Washington, on hearing this circumstance, despatched one of his aids with orders for the immediate release of the persons and property which had been confined; but the officers refused to proceed on their journey, and returned to Philadelphia.[105]

General Washington, upon hearing this situation, sent one of his aides with instructions for the immediate release of the people and property that had been detained; however, the officers refused to continue on their journey and went back to Philadelphia.[105]

This untoward event was much regretted by the Commander-in-chief. In a letter received some time afterwards, General Howe, after expressing his willingness that the American prisoners should be visited by deputy commissaries, who should inspect their situation, and supply their wants required, as the condition on which this indulgence should be granted, "that a similar permit should be allowed to persons appointed by him, which should be accompanied with the assurance of General Washington, that his authority will have sufficient weight to prevent any interruption to their progress, and any insult to their persons." This demand was ascribed to the treatment to which officers under the protection of his passport had already been exposed.

This unfortunate event was greatly regretted by the Commander-in-Chief. In a letter received some time later, General Howe expressed his willingness for American prisoners to be visited by deputy commissaries, who would inspect their situation and meet their needs. However, he stated that this allowance would only be granted on the condition that a similar permit would be issued to people he appointed, which would be backed by General Washington's assurance that his authority would be respected to prevent any disruptions or insults to their persons. This demand was attributed to the treatment that officers under the protection of his passport had already experienced.

General Washington lamented the impediment to the exchange of prisoners, which had hitherto appeared to be insuperable; and made repeated, but ineffectual efforts to remove it. General Howe had uniformly refused to proceed with any cartel, unless his right to claim for all the diseased and infirm, whom he had liberated, should be previously admitted.

General Washington expressed his frustration over the obstacles to exchanging prisoners, which had seemed impossible to overcome; he made several attempts, but none were successful in resolving it. General Howe consistently refused to move forward with any agreement unless his right to claim all the sick and injured individuals he had freed was acknowledged first.

At length, after all hope of inducing him to recede from that high ground had been abandoned, he suddenly relinquished it of his own accord, and acceded completely to the proposition of General Washington for the meeting of commissioners, in order to settle equitably the number to which he should be entitled for those he had discharged in the preceding winter. This point being adjusted, commissaries were mutually appointed, who were to meet on the 10th of March, in Germantown, to arrange the details of a general cartel.

At last, after everyone had given up on convincing him to change his stance, he unexpectedly changed his mind and fully agreed to General Washington's proposal for a meeting of commissioners to fairly determine the number he should receive for those he had let go the previous winter. Once this was settled, both sides appointed commissaries who were to meet on March 10th in Germantown to work out the details of a general agreement.

March 4.

The Commander-in-chief had entertained no doubt of his authority to enter into this agreement. On the fourth of March, however, he had the mortification to perceive in a newspaper, a resolution of congress calling on the several states for the amounts of supplies furnished the prisoners, that they might be adjusted according to the rule of the 10th of December, before the exchange should take place.

The Commander-in-Chief never doubted his right to make this agreement. However, on March 4th, he felt humiliated to see in a newspaper a resolution from Congress asking the states for the total amount of supplies given to the prisoners, so they could be settled according to the rule from December 10th, before the exchange happened.

On seeing this embarrassing resolution, General Washington addressed a letter to Sir William Howe, informing him that particular circumstances had rendered it inconvenient for the American commissioners to attend at the time appointed, and requesting that their meeting should be deferred from the 10th to the 21st of March. The interval was successfully employed in obtaining a repeal of the resolution.

On seeing this embarrassing decision, General Washington wrote a letter to Sir William Howe, letting him know that certain circumstances had made it difficult for the American commissioners to meet at the scheduled time, and asking if their meeting could be pushed back from the 10th to the 21st of March. During that time, they successfully worked to get the resolution repealed.

It would seem probable that the dispositions of congress on the subject of an exchange, did not correspond with those of General Washington. From the fundamental principle of the military establishment of the United States at its commencement, an exchange of prisoners would necessarily strengthen the British, much more than the American army. The war having been carried on by troops raised for short times, aided by militia, the American prisoners, when exchanged, returned to their homes as citizens, while those of the enemy again took the field.

It seems likely that Congress’s views on the topic of an exchange didn’t align with General Washington’s. From the basic principle of the U.S. military's formation, an exchange of prisoners would strengthen the British forces much more than the American army. Since the war was fought by troops enlisted for short periods and supported by militia, American prisoners returned home as citizens after being exchanged, while enemy soldiers went back to fight.

General Washington, who was governed by a policy more just, and more permanently beneficial, addressed himself seriously to congress, urging, as well the injury done the public faith, and his own personal honour, by this infraction of a solemn engagement, as the cruelty and impolicy of a system which must cut off for ever all hopes of an exchange, and render imprisonment as lasting as the war. He represented in strong terms the effect such a measure must have on the troops on whom they should thereafter be compelled chiefly to rely, and its impression on the friends of those already in captivity. These remonstrances produced the desired effect, and the resolutions were repealed. The commissioners met according to the second appointment; but, on examining their powers, it appeared that those given by General Washington were expressed to be in virtue of the authority vested in him; while those given by Sir William Howe contained no such declaration.

General Washington, guided by a fairer and more lasting policy, seriously addressed Congress, stressing both the damage done to public trust and his own personal honor by this breach of a solemn commitment, as well as the cruelty and poor judgment of a system that would forever eliminate any hopes of a prisoner exchange, making imprisonment last as long as the war. He strongly represented the impact such a measure would have on the troops they would need to rely on in the future, and the effect it would have on the families of those already captured. These arguments had the desired impact, and the resolutions were overturned. The commissioners convened as per the new appointment; however, upon reviewing their authorities, it turned out that those granted by General Washington were based on his vested authority, while those given by Sir William Howe did not include such a statement.

This omission produced an objection on the part of the United States; but General Howe refused to change the language, alleging that he designed the treaty to be of a personal nature, founded on the mutual confidence and honour of the contracting generals; and had no intention either to bind his government, or to extend the cartel beyond the limits and duration of his own command.

This omission led to an objection from the United States; however, General Howe refused to alter the wording, arguing that he intended the treaty to be personal, based on the mutual trust and honor of the commanding generals; and he had no intention to bind his government or to extend the agreement beyond the scope and duration of his own command.

This explanation being unsatisfactory to the American commissioners, and General Howe persisting in his refusal to make the required alteration in his powers, the negotiation was broken off, and this fair prospect of terminating the distresses of numerous unfortunate persons passed away, without effecting the good it had promised.

This explanation did not satisfy the American commissioners, and General Howe continued to refuse to change his powers as needed. The negotiation fell apart, and this promising opportunity to alleviate the suffering of many unfortunate people was lost without achieving the good it had promised.

Some time after the failure of this negotiation for a general cartel, Sir William Howe proposed that all prisoners actually exchangeable should be sent in to the nearest posts, and returns made of officer for officer of equal rank, and soldier for soldier, as far as numbers would admit; and that if a surplus of officers, should remain, they should be exchanged for an equivalent in privates.

Some time after the failed negotiation for a general cartel, Sir William Howe suggested that all prisoners who could actually be exchanged should be sent to the nearest posts, and that officers would be exchanged one-for-one based on their rank, and soldiers for soldiers, as long as numbers allowed; and if there were extra officers left, they should be swapped for an equivalent number of privates.

A partial exchange agreed to.

On the representations of General Washington, congress acceded to this proposition, so far as related to the exchange of officer for officer, and soldier for soldier; but rejected the part which admitted an equivalent in privates for a surplus of officers, because the officers captured with Burgoyne were exchangeable within the powers of General Howe. Under this agreement, an exchange took place to a considerable extent; but as the Americans had lost more prisoners than they had taken, unless the army of Burgoyne should be brought into computation, many of their troops were still detained in captivity.

On the representations of General Washington, Congress agreed to this proposal, at least regarding the exchange of officer for officer and soldier for soldier; however, they rejected the portion that allowed for an equivalent of privates for a surplus of officers because the officers captured with Burgoyne could be exchanged under General Howe’s authority. Under this agreement, a significant exchange took place; but since the Americans had captured more prisoners than they had taken, many of their troops remained in captivity unless the army of Burgoyne was included in the calculations.


NOTES.

NOTE—No. I. See Page 5.

It will not be unacceptable to the reader to peruse this first report of a young gentleman who afterwards performed so distinguished a part in the revolution of his country, it is therefore inserted at large.

It won’t be objectionable for the reader to read this first report of a young man who later played such a significant role in the revolution of his country, so it is included in full.

I was commissioned and appointed by the Hon. Robert Dinwiddie, Esq. Governor &c. of Virginia, to visit and deliver a letter to the commandant of the French forces on the Ohio, and set out on the intended journey on the same day: the next, I arrived at Fredericksburg, and engaged Mr. Jacob Vanbraam to be my French interpreter, and proceeded with him to Alexandria, where we provided necessaries. From thence we went to Winchester, and got baggage, horses, &c. and from thence we pursued the new road to Wills' Creek, where we arrived the 14th November.

I was assigned and appointed by the Honorable Robert Dinwiddie, Esq., Governor of Virginia, to take a letter to the commander of the French forces on the Ohio, and I set out on the journey that same day. The next day, I reached Fredericksburg and hired Mr. Jacob Vanbraam to be my French interpreter. We then went to Alexandria, where we gathered supplies. From there, we traveled to Winchester to get our bags, horses, and other necessities, and then we took the new road to Wills' Creek, where we arrived on November 14th.

Here I engaged Mr. Gist to pilot us out, and also hired four others as servitors, Barnaby Currin, and John M'Quire, Indian traders, Henry Steward, and William Jenkins; and in company with those persons left the inhabitants the next day.

Here, I hired Mr. Gist to guide us out and also employed four others as helpers: Barnaby Currin and John M'Quire, who were Indian traders, along with Henry Steward and William Jenkins. The next day, we left the inhabitants with those individuals.

The excessive rains and vast quantity of snow which had fallen, prevented our reaching Mr. Frazier's, an Indian trader, at the mouth of Turtle creek, on Monongahela river, until Thursday the 22d. We were informed here, that expresses had been sent a few days before to the traders down the river, to acquaint them with the French general's death, and the return of the major part of the French army into winter quarters.

The heavy rain and large amount of snow that had fallen kept us from getting to Mr. Frazier's, an Indian trader, at the mouth of Turtle Creek on the Monongahela River until Thursday the 22nd. We learned that messages had been sent a few days earlier to the traders downriver to inform them about the French general's death and the return of most of the French army to winter quarters.

The waters were quite impassable without swimming our horses, which obliged us to get the loan of a canoe from Frazier, and to send Barnaby Currin and Henry Steward down the Monongahela, with our baggage, to meet us at the forks of Ohio, about ten miles; there, to cross the Alleghany.

The waters were pretty much impossible to cross without swimming our horses, so we had to borrow a canoe from Frazier and send Barnaby Currin and Henry Steward down the Monongahela with our luggage to meet us at the Ohio forks, about ten miles away; from there, they would cross the Allegheny.

As I got down before the canoe, I spent some time in viewing the rivers, and the land in the fork, which I think extremely well situated for a fort, as it has the absolute command of both rivers. The land at the point is twenty, or twenty-five feet above the common surface of the water; and a considerable bottom of flat, well timbered land all around it very convenient for building. The rivers are each a quarter of a mile or more across, and run here very nearly at right angles; Alleghany, bearing northeast; and Monongahela, southeast. The former of these two is a very rapid and swift running water, the other deep and still, without any perceptible fall.

As I approached the canoe, I took a moment to look at the rivers and the land at the fork, which I believe is ideally suited for a fort since it has complete control over both rivers. The land at the point is around twenty or twenty-five feet above the usual water level, with a large area of flat, well-timbered land all around it, perfect for building. The rivers are each about a quarter of a mile wide or more and flow nearly at right angles here; the Allegheny runs northeast, and the Monongahela flows southeast. The former is a very fast-moving waterway, while the latter is deep and calm, with no noticeable drop.

About two miles from this, on the southeast side of the river, at the place where the Ohio company intended to erect a fort, lives Shingiss, king of the Delawares. We called upon him, to invite him to council at the Loggstown.

About two miles from here, on the southeast side of the river, at the spot where the Ohio company planned to build a fort, lives Shingiss, king of the Delawares. We visited him to invite him to a council at Loggstown.

As I had taken a good deal of notice yesterday of the situation at the fork, my curiosity led me to examine this more particularly, and I think it greatly inferior, either for defence or advantages; especially the latter. For a fort at the fork would be equally well situated on the Ohio, and have the entire command of the Monongahela, which runs up our settlement, and is extremely well designed for water carriage, as it is of a deep, still nature. Besides, a fort at the fork might be built at much less expense than at the other places.

As I paid close attention yesterday to the situation at the fork, my curiosity drove me to look into it more closely, and I believe it’s significantly less favorable, both for defense and advantages; especially the latter. A fort at the fork would be just as well positioned on the Ohio and would have complete control over the Monongahela, which flows up to our settlement and is ideal for transport because of its deep, calm waters. Additionally, a fort at the fork could be built at a much lower cost than at the other locations.

Nature has well contrived this lower place for water defence; but the hill whereon it must stand being about a quarter of a mile in length, and then descending gradually on the land side, will render it difficult and very expensive to make a sufficient fortification there. The whole flat upon the hill must be taken in, the side next the descent made extremely high, or else the hill itself cut away: otherwise, the enemy may raise batteries within that distance without being exposed to a single shot from the fort.

Nature has designed this lower area for water defense, but the hill it needs to be built on is about a quarter of a mile long and slopes down on the land side, making it tough and costly to create a solid fortification there. The entire flat area on the hill needs to be included, and the side facing the descent must be made very high, or the hill would need to be cut down; otherwise, the enemy could set up artillery within that range without being hit by any fire from the fort.

Shingiss attended us to the Loggstown, where we arrived between sun-setting and dark, the twenty-fifth day after I left Williamsburg. We travelled over some extremely good and bad land to get to this place.

Shingiss accompanied us to Loggstown, where we arrived between sunset and dark, twenty-five days after I left Williamsburg. We traveled over some really good and some really bad land to get here.

As soon as I came into town, I went to Monakatoocha (as the half king was out at his hunting cabin on Little Beaver creek, about fifteen miles off) and informed him by John Davidson, my Indian interpreter, that I was sent a messenger to the French general; and was ordered to call upon the sachems of the Six Nations to acquaint them with it. I gave him a string of wampum and a twist of tobacco, and desired him to send for the half king, which he promised to do by a runner in the morning, and for other sachems. I invited him and the other great men present, to my tent, where they stayed about an hour and returned.

As soon as I arrived in town, I went to Monakatoocha (since the half king was at his hunting cabin on Little Beaver Creek, about fifteen miles away) and informed him through John Davidson, my Indian interpreter, that I had been sent as a messenger to the French general; and I was instructed to meet with the leaders of the Six Nations to let them know about it. I presented him with a string of wampum and a bundle of tobacco, requesting him to summon the half king, which he agreed to do through a runner in the morning, along with the other leaders. I invited him and the other prominent figures present to my tent, where they stayed for about an hour before leaving.

According to the best observations I could make, Mr. Gift's new settlement (which we passed by) bears about west northwest seventy miles from Wills' creek; Shanapins, or the forks, north by west, or north northwest about fifty miles from that; and from thence to the Loggstown, the course is nearly west about eighteen or twenty miles: so that the whole distance, as we went and computed it, is, at least, one hundred and thirty-five or one hundred and forty miles from our back inhabitants.

According to my best observations, Mr. Gift's new settlement (which we passed by) is located about seventy miles west-northwest from Wills' Creek; Shanapins, or the forks, is about fifty miles north by west, or north-northwest from there; and from that point to Loggstown, it’s almost a straight west route of about eighteen to twenty miles. So, the total distance we calculated is at least one hundred thirty-five to one hundred forty miles from our back inhabitants.

25th. Came to town, four of ten Frenchmen, who had deserted from a company at the Kuskuskas, which lies at the mouth of this river. I got the following account from them. They were sent from New Orleans with a hundred men, and eight canoe loads of provisions, to this place, where they expected to have met the same number of men, from the forts on this side of lake Erie, to convoy them and the stores up, who were not arrived when they ran off.

25th. Came to town, four of ten Frenchmen who had deserted from a company at the Kuskuskas, which is at the mouth of this river. I got the following story from them. They were sent from New Orleans with a hundred men and eight canoe loads of supplies to this place, where they expected to meet the same number of men from the forts on this side of Lake Erie to escort them and the supplies up, but those men hadn’t arrived when they decided to leave.

I inquired into the situation of the French on the Mississippi, their numbers, and what forts they had built. They informed me, that there were four small forts between New Orleans and the Black Islands, garrisoned with about thirty or forty men, and a few small pieces in each. That at New Orleans, which is near the mouth of the Mississippi, there are thirty-five companies of forty men each, with a pretty strong fort mounting eight carriage guns; and at the Black Islands there are several companies and a fort with six guns. The Black Islands are about a hundred and thirty leagues above the mouth of the Ohio, which is about three hundred and fifty above New Orleans. They also acquainted me, that there was a small pallisadoed fort on the Ohio, at the mouth of the Obaish, about sixty leagues from the Mississippi. The Obaish heads near the west end of lake Erie, and affords the communication between the French on the Mississippi and those on the lakes. These deserters came up from the lower Shannoah town with one Brown, an Indian trader, and were going to Philadelphia.

I asked about the situation of the French along the Mississippi, their numbers, and the forts they had constructed. They told me that there were four small forts between New Orleans and the Black Islands, manned by about thirty to forty men each, with a few small cannons at each fort. In New Orleans, which is close to the mouth of the Mississippi, there are thirty-five companies, each with forty men, and a fairly strong fort equipped with eight artillery pieces. At the Black Islands, there are several companies and a fort with six guns. The Black Islands are about one hundred thirty leagues upstream from the mouth of the Ohio River, which is roughly three hundred fifty leagues above New Orleans. They also mentioned that there was a small palisaded fort on the Ohio River, at the mouth of the Obaish, about sixty leagues from the Mississippi. The Obaish starts near the west end of Lake Erie and provides a route between the French on the Mississippi and those on the lakes. These deserters had come up from the lower Shannoah town with an Indian trader named Brown and were heading to Philadelphia.

About three o'clock this evening the half king came to town. I went up and invited him with Davidson, privately, to my tent; and desired him to relate some of the particulars of his journey to the French commandant, and of his reception there; also, to give me an account of the ways and distance. He told me, that the nearest and levelest way was now impassable, by reason of many large miry savannas; that we must be obliged to go by Venango, and should not get to the near fort in less than five or six nights sleep, good travelling. When he went to the fort, he said he was received in a very stern manner by the late commander, who asked him very abruptly, what he had come about, and to declare his business: which he said he did in the following speech:

About three o'clock this afternoon, the half king came to town. I went up and invited him and Davidson to my tent privately, asking him to share some details about his journey to the French commander and how he was received there. I also wanted him to explain the routes and distances. He told me that the closest and easiest path was now blocked due to many large muddy wetlands; we would have to go by Venango and wouldn’t reach the nearby fort in less than five or six nights of good travel. When he went to the fort, he said he was received very sternly by the previous commander, who abruptly asked him what he had come for and demanded that he state his business, which he said he did in the following speech:

"Fathers, I am come to tell you your own speeches; what your own mouths have declared. Fathers, you, in former days, set a silver basin before us, wherein there was the leg of a beaver, and desired all the nations to come and eat of it, to eat in peace and plenty, and not to be churlish to one another: and that if any such person should be found to be a disturber, I here lay down by the edge of the dish a rod, which you must scourge them with; and if your father should get foolish, in my old days, I desire you may use it upon me as well as others.

"Fathers, I’m here to remind you of your own words; what you have said with your own mouths. Fathers, in the past, you placed a silver basin before us, containing a beaver's leg, and invited all the nations to come and share it, to eat together in harmony and abundance, and not to be unkind to one another. And if anyone is found to be causing trouble, I now set down this rod beside the dish for you to use on them; and if your father acts foolishly in my old age, I hope you will use it on me just like anyone else."

"Now, fathers, it is you who are the disturbers in this land, by coming and building your towns; and taking it away unknown to us, and by force.

"Now, fathers, you are the ones causing trouble in this land by coming in and building your towns, taking it away from us without our knowledge and by force."

"Fathers, we kindled a fire a long time ago, at a place called Montreal, where we desired you to stay, and not to come and intrude upon our land. I now desire you may despatch to that place; for be it known to you, fathers, that this is our land and not yours.

"Fathers, we started a fire a long time ago in a place called Montreal, where we wanted you to stay and not come and invade our land. I now ask you to send someone to that place; for it should be clear to you, fathers, that this is our land and not yours."

"Fathers, I desire you may hear me in civilness; if not, we must handle that rod which was laid down for the use of the obstreperous. If you had come in a peaceable manner, like our brothers the English, we would not have been against your trading with us, as they do; but to come, fathers, and build houses upon our land, and to take it by force, is what we can not submit to.

"Fathers, I hope you’ll listen to me politely; if not, we’ll have to deal with the consequences. If you had approached us peacefully, like our English brothers do, we wouldn’t have opposed your trading with us; but coming to our land, building houses, and taking it by force is something we cannot accept."

"Fathers, both you and the English are white, we live in a country between; therefore, the land belongs to neither one nor the other. But the great Being above allowed it to be a place of residence for us; so, fathers, I desire you to withdraw, as I have done our brothers the English; for I will keep you at arm's length. I lay this down as a trial for both, to see which will have the greatest regard to it, and that side we will stand by, and make equal sharers with us. Our brothers, the English, have heard this, and I come now to tell it to you; for I am not afraid to discharge you off this land." This he said was the substance of what he spoke to the general, who made this reply.

"Fathers, both you and the English are white, and we live in a country in between; therefore, this land doesn’t belong to either of you. But the higher power allowed it to be our home; so, fathers, I ask you to step back, just as I have done with our English brothers; I want to keep a distance from you. I set this up as a test for both sides, to see which one will show the most respect for it, and that’s the side we will support and share equally with. Our brothers, the English, have heard this, and I’m here to share it with you; I’m not afraid to tell you to leave this land." This is what he said was the main point of his conversation with the general, who responded.

"Now, my child, I have heard your speech: you spoke first, but it is my time to speak now. Where is my wampum that you took away, with the marks of towns in it? This wampum I do not know, which you have discharged me off the land with: but you need not put yourself to the trouble of speaking, for I will not hear you. I am not afraid of flies or musquitoes, for Indians are such as those: I tell you down that river I will go, and build upon it, according to my command. If the river was blocked up, I have forces sufficient to burst it open, and tread under my feet all that stand in opposition, together with their alliances; for my force is as the sand upon the sea shore: therefore here is your wampum; I sling it at you. Child, you talk foolish; you say this land belongs to you, but there is not the black of my nail yours. I saw that land sooner than you did, before the Shannoahs and you were at war; Lead was the man who went down and took possession of that river. It is my land, and I will have it, let who will stand up for, or say against it. I will buy and sell with the English (mockingly). If people will be ruled by me, they may expect kindness, but not else."

"Listen, my child, I've heard what you had to say: you spoke first, but now it's my turn. Where's my wampum that you took, the one with the town symbols on it? I don’t recognize this wampum that you’ve used to strip me of my land: but don’t bother trying to convince me, I won’t listen. I’m not afraid of flies or mosquitoes, because Indians are like that: I’m telling you, I’m going down that river and building on it, as I’ve said. If the river is blocked, I have the strength to break through it and crush anyone who stands against me, along with their allies; my strength is as great as the sand on the seashore. So here’s your wampum; I’m throwing it back at you. Child, you’re talking nonsense; you claim this land is yours, but not a speck of it belongs to you. I saw that land before you did, long before there were wars with the Shannoahs. Lead was the one who went down and claimed that river. It’s my land, and I will take it, no matter who stands for it or against it. I will trade with the English (mockingly). If people choose to follow me, they can expect kindness, but nothing more."

The half king told me he had inquired of the general after two Englishmen, who were made prisoners, and received this answer:

The half king told me he had asked the general about two Englishmen who were taken prisoner, and he got this response:

"Child, you think it a very great hardship that I made prisoners of those two people at Venango. Don't you concern yourself with it: we took and carried them to Canada, to get intelligence of what the English were doing in Virginia."

"Child, you think it's a huge burden that I captured those two people at Venango. Don't worry about it: we took them and brought them to Canada to find out what the English were doing in Virginia."

He informed me that they had built two forts, one on lake Erie, and another on French creek, near a small lake, about fifteen miles asunder, and a large wagon road between. They are both built after the same model, but different in size: that on the lake the largest. He gave me a plan of them of his own drawing.

He told me that they had built two forts, one on Lake Erie and another on French Creek, near a small lake, about fifteen miles apart, with a big wagon road in between. Both are built in the same style but are different sizes, with the one by the lake being the biggest. He gave me a plan of them that he drew himself.

The Indians inquired very particularly after their brothers in Carolina gaol.

The Indians asked specifically about their brothers in the Carolina jail.

They also asked what sort of a boy it was who was taken from the south branch; for they were told by some Indians, that a party of French Indians had carried a white boy by Kuskuska town, towards the lakes.

They also asked what kind of boy was taken from the south branch; because some Indians told them that a group of French Indians had taken a white boy near Kuskuska town, towards the lakes.

26th. We met in council at the long house about nine o'clock, when I spoke to them as follows:

26th. We gathered in council at the long house around nine o'clock, when I addressed them as follows:

"Brothers, I have called you together in council, by order of your brother the governor of Virginia, to acquaint you, that I am sent with all possible despatch, to visit and deliver a letter to the French commandant, of very great importance to your brothers the English; and I dare say to you, their friends and allies.

"Brothers, I have called you together for a meeting, as directed by your brother, the governor of Virginia, to let you know that I have been sent as quickly as possible to visit and deliver a letter to the French commander, which is very important for your brothers, the English; and I believe it will also matter to you, their friends and allies."

"I was desired, brothers, by your brother the governor to call upon you, the sachems of the nations, to inform you of it, and to ask your advice and assistance to proceed the nearest and best road to the French. You see, brothers, I have gotten thus far on my journey.

"I was asked, brothers, by your brother the governor to reach out to you, the leaders of the nations, to let you know about this and to seek your advice and help in finding the closest and best way to the French. You see, brothers, I've made it this far on my journey."

"His honour likewise desired me to apply to you for some of your young men to conduct and provide provisions for us on our way; and be a safeguard against those French Indians who have taken up the hatchet against us. I have spoken thus particularly to you, brothers, because his honour our governor treats you as good friends and allies, and holds you in great esteem. To confirm what I have said, I give you this string of wampum."

"His honor also asked me to reach out to you for some of your young men to guide us and provide supplies on our journey; and to protect us from those French Indians who have turned against us. I’ve spoken to you directly, brothers, because our governor regards you as true friends and allies, and holds you in high regard. To reinforce what I’m saying, I give you this string of wampum."

After they had considered for some time on the above discourse, the half king got up and spoke.

After thinking about the conversation for a while, the half king stood up and spoke.

"Now, my brother, in regard to what my brother the governor had desired of me, I return you this answer.

"Now, my brother, in response to what my brother the governor requested from me, I give you this answer."

"I rely upon you as a brother ought to do, as you say we are brothers, and one people. We shall put heart in hand and speak to our fathers, the French, concerning the speech they made to me; and you may depend that we will endeavour to be your guard.

"I depend on you like a brother should, since you claim we are brothers and one people. Let’s gather our courage and talk to our fathers, the French, about what they said to me; and you can count on us to try our best to protect you."

"Brother, as you have asked my advice, I hope you will be ruled by it, and stay until I can provide a company to go with you. The French speech belt is not here; I have it to go for to my hunting cabin. Likewise, the people whom I have ordered in are not yet come, and can not until the third night from this; until which time, brother, I must beg you to stay.

"Brother, since you've asked for my advice, I hope you'll take it and wait until I can get a group together to go with you. The French-speaking guide isn't here; I need him for my hunting cabin. Also, the people I've called for haven't arrived yet and won't be here until three nights from now; so, brother, I must ask you to stay until then."

"I intend to send the guard of Mingos, Shannoahs, and Delawares, that our brothers may see the love and loyalty we bear them."

"I plan to send the guard of Mingos, Shannoahs, and Delawares, so our brothers can see the love and loyalty we have for them."

As I had orders to make all possible despatch, and waiting here was very contrary to my inclination, I thanked him in the most suitable manner I could; and told him that my business required the greatest expedition, and would not admit of that delay. He was not well pleased that I should offer to go before the time he had appointed, and told me, that he could not consent to our going without a guard, for fear some accident should befall us, and draw a reflection upon him. Besides, said he, this is a matter of no small moment, and must not be entered into without due consideration; for I intend to deliver up the French speech belt, and make the Shannoahs and Delawares do the same. And accordingly he gave orders to king Shingiss, who was present, to attend on Wednesday night with the wampum; and two men of their nation to be in readiness to set out with us next morning. As I found it was impossible to get off without affronting them in the most egregious manner, I consented to stay.

As I was instructed to make all possible haste, and waiting here went against my wishes, I thanked him in the best way I could and explained that my business required urgency and wouldn’t allow for delays. He wasn’t pleased that I suggested leaving before the time he had set and told me that he couldn’t agree to us going without a guard, in case something happened that would reflect poorly on him. Besides, he said, this is an important matter that shouldn’t be rushed; I plan to hand over the French speech belt and ensure the Shannoahs and Delawares do the same. He then instructed King Shingiss, who was present, to come on Wednesday night with the wampum, and to have two men from their tribe ready to leave with us the next morning. Realizing it would be impossible to leave without seriously offending them, I agreed to stay.

I gave them back a string of wampum which I met with at Mr. Frazier's, and which they sent with a speech to his honour the governor, to inform him, that three nations of French Indians, viz. Chippoways, Ottoways, and Orundaks, had taken up the hatchet against the English; and desired them to repeat it over again. But this they postponed doing until they met in full council with the Shannoah and Delaware chiefs.

I returned a string of wampum that I found at Mr. Frazier's, which they sent along with a message to Governor Frazier, informing him that three nations of French Indians—namely the Chippewas, Ottawas, and Orondaks—had declared war against the English; and they wanted them to repeat it again. However, they put off doing that until they could meet in a full council with the Shawnee and Delaware chiefs.

27th. Runners were despatched very early for the Shannoah chiefs. The half king set out himself to fetch the French speech belt from his hunting cabin.

27th. Runners were sent out very early for the Shannoah chiefs. The half king set out himself to get the French speech belt from his hunting cabin.

28th. He returned this evening, and came with Monakatoocha, and two other sachems to my tent; and begged (as they had complied with his honour the governor's request, in providing men, &c.) to know on what business we were going to the French? This was a question I had all along expected, and had provided as satisfactory answers to as I could; which allayed their curiosity a little.

28th. He came back this evening with Monakatoocha and two other leaders to my tent, and asked (since they had fulfilled the governor's request by providing men, etc.) what our business was with the French. This was a question I had expected all along, and I had prepared the best answers I could to satisfy their curiosity a bit.

Monakatoocha informed me, that an Indian from Venango brought news, a few days ago, that the French had called all the Mingos, Delawares, &c. together at that place; and told them that they intended to have been down the river this fall, but the waters were growing cold, and the winter advancing, which obliged them to go into quarters; but that they might assuredly expect them in the spring, with a far greater number; and desired that they might be quite passive, and not intermeddle unless they had a mind to draw all their force upon them: for that they expected to fight the English three years (as they supposed there would be some attempts made to stop them) in which time they should conquer. But that if they should prove equally strong, they and the English would join to cut them all off, and divide the land between them: that though they had lost their general, and some few of their soldiers, yet there were men enough to reinforce them, and make them masters of the Ohio.

Monakatoocha told me that an Indian from Venango brought news a few days ago that the French had gathered all the Mingos, Delawares, etc. at that place. They informed them that they had planned to go down the river this fall, but since the weather was getting colder and winter was coming, they had to settle in for the season. However, they assured them they could expect them in the spring with a much larger force and asked them to remain completely passive and not get involved unless they wanted to attract all the attention to themselves. The French anticipated fighting the English for three years, as they thought there would be attempts to stop them, during which they believed they would conquer. But if they ended up being equally strong, they and the English would team up to wipe them all out and split the land between them. Even though they had lost their general and a few soldiers, they still had enough men to strengthen their ranks and seize control of the Ohio.

This speech, he said, was delivered to them by one Captain Joncaire, their interpreter in chief, living at Venango, and a man of note in the army.

This speech, he said, was given to them by Captain Joncaire, their main interpreter, who lived in Venango and was an important figure in the army.

29th. The half king and Monakatoocha, came very early and begged me to stay one day more: for notwithstanding they had used all the diligence in their power, the Shannoah chiefs had not brought the wampum they ordered, but would certainly be in to night; if not, they would delay me no longer, but would send it after us as soon as they arrived. When I found them so pressing in their request, and knew that returning of wampum was the abolishing of agreements; and giving this up was shaking off all dependence upon the French, I consented to stay, as I believed an offence offered at this crisis, might be attended with greater ill consequence, than another day's delay. They also informed me, that Shingiss could not get in his men; and was prevented from coming himself by his wife's sickness; (I believe, by fear of the French) but that the wampum of that nation was lodged with Kustalogo, one of their chiefs, at Venango.

29th. The Half King and Monakatoocha came very early and asked me to stay one more day. Despite their best efforts, the Shannoah chiefs hadn’t brought the wampum they were supposed to deliver but assured me it would arrive tonight; if not, they wouldn’t hold me up any longer and would send it after us as soon as they got it. When I saw how insistent they were, and understood that returning the wampum would mean breaking our agreements and severing ties with the French, I agreed to stay. I believed that offending them at this critical moment could lead to worse consequences than delaying for another day. They also informed me that Shingiss couldn't get his men and was unable to come himself because his wife was sick (I think it was due to fear of the French), but that the wampum from that nation was with Kustalogo, one of their chiefs, at Venango.

In the evening, late, they came again, and acquainted me that the Shannoahs were not yet arrived, but that it should not retard the prosecution of our journey. He delivered in my hearing the speech that was to be made to the French by Jeskakake, one of their old chiefs, which was giving up the belt the late commandant had asked for, and repeating nearly the same speech he himself had done before.

In the evening, late, they came back and informed me that the Shannoahs hadn’t arrived yet, but that it wouldn’t delay our journey. He recited in my presence the speech that Jeskakake, one of their old chiefs, was going to deliver to the French, which involved handing over the belt that the late commander had requested and repeating almost the same speech he had given before.

He also delivered a string of wampum to this chief, which was sent by king Shingiss, to be given to Kustalogo, with orders to repair to the French, and deliver up the wampum.

He also handed over a string of wampum to this chief, which was sent by King Shingiss to be given to Kustalogo, with instructions to go to the French and deliver the wampum.

He likewise gave a very large string of black and white wampum, which was to be sent up immediately to the Six Nations, if the French refused to quit the land at this warning; which was the third and last time, and was the right of this Jeskakake to deliver.

He also provided a long string of black and white wampum that was to be sent right away to the Six Nations if the French refused to leave the land after this warning; this was the third and final time, and it was the responsibility of this Jeskakake to deliver it.

30th. Last night, the great men assembled at their council house, to consult further about this journey, and who were to go: the result of which was, that only three of their chiefs, with one of their best hunters, should be our convoy. The reason they gave for not sending more, after what had been proposed at council the 26th, was, that a greater number might give the French suspicions of some bad design, and cause them to be treated rudely: but I rather think they could not get their hunters in.

30th. Last night, the important men gathered at their council house to discuss this journey and decide who would go: the outcome was that only three of their chiefs, along with one of their best hunters, would accompany us. The reason they gave for not sending more, after what had been proposed at the council on the 26th, was that having a larger group might raise suspicions with the French about a bad intention and lead to them being treated roughly; but I think it was more likely that they couldn't get their hunters available.

We set out about nine o'clock with the half king, Jeskakake, White Thunder, and the Hunter; and travelled on the road to Venango, where we arrived the fourth of December, without any thing remarkable happening but a continued series of bad weather.

We left around nine o'clock with the half king, Jeskakake, White Thunder, and the Hunter; and traveled along the road to Venango, where we arrived on December fourth, with nothing noteworthy happening except for a string of bad weather.

This is an old Indian town, situated at the mouth of French creek, on Ohio; and lies near north about sixty miles from the Loggstown, but more than seventy the way we were obliged to go.

This is an old Indian town located at the mouth of French Creek in Ohio, about sixty miles north of Loggstown, although it was more than seventy miles the way we had to travel.

We found the French colours hoisted at a house from which they had driven Mr. John Frazier, an English subject. I immediately repaired to it, to know where the commander resided. There were three officers, one of whom, Captain Joncaire, informed me that he had the command of the Ohio; but that there was a general officer at the near fort, where he advised me to apply for an answer. He invited us to sup with them, and treated us with the greatest complaisance.

We saw the French colors raised at a house from which they had expelled Mr. John Frazier, a British citizen. I quickly went there to find out where the commander was staying. There were three officers, and one of them, Captain Joncaire, told me he was in charge of the Ohio, but that there was a general officer at the nearby fort, where he suggested I go for an answer. He invited us to dinner and was extremely friendly to us.

The wine, as they dosed themselves pretty plentifully with it, soon banished the restraint which at first appeared in their conversation, and gave a license to their tongues to reveal their sentiments more freely.

The wine, as they indulged in it quite a bit, quickly removed the initial restraint in their conversation and allowed them to express their feelings more openly.

They told me, that it was their absolute design to take possession of the Ohio, and by G-d they would do it: for that, although they were sensible the English could raise two men for their one, yet they knew their motions were too slow and dilatory to prevent any undertaking of theirs. They pretend to have an undoubted right to the river from a discovery made by one La Salle, sixty years ago: and the rise of this expedition is, to prevent our settling on the river or waters of it, as they heard of some families moving out in order thereto. From the best intelligence I could get, there have been fifteen hundred men on this side Ontario lake. But upon the death of the general, all were recalled to about six or seven hundred, who were left to garrison four forts, one hundred and fifty or thereabout in each. The first of them is on French creek, near a small lake, about sixty miles from Venango, near north northwest: the next lies on lake Erie, where the greater part of their stores are kept, about fifteen miles from the other: from this it is one hundred and twenty miles to the carrying place, at the falls of Lake Erie, where there is a small fort, at which they lodge their goods in bringing them from Montreal, the place from whence all their stores are brought. The next fort lies about twenty miles from this, on Ontario lake. Between this fort and Montreal, there are three others, the first of which is nearly opposite to the English fort Oswego. From the fort on lake Erie to Montreal is about six hundred miles, which, they say, requires no more (if good weather,) than four weeks voyage, if they go in barks or large vessels, so that they may cross the lake: but if they come in canoes, it will require five or six weeks, for they are obliged to keep under the shore.

They told me that they were completely set on taking control of the Ohio River, and they were determined to do it. Even though they knew the English could muster two men for every one of theirs, they figured the English were too slow to stop them from doing what they wanted. They claim they have an undeniable right to the river based on a discovery made by a guy named La Salle sixty years ago. The reason for this expedition is to keep us from settling along the river or its waters, as they’ve heard some families are planning to move there. From what I gathered, there were around fifteen hundred men on this side of Lake Ontario. But after the general's death, they pulled back to about six or seven hundred men who were left to garrison four forts, roughly one hundred and fifty in each. The first fort is on French Creek, near a small lake, around sixty miles from Venango, to the north-northwest. The second one is on Lake Erie, where most of their supplies are stored, about fifteen miles from the first. From there, it’s a hundred and twenty miles to the carrying place at the falls of Lake Erie, where there is a small fort for storing goods brought from Montreal, which is where all their supplies come from. The next fort is about twenty miles from this one, on Lake Ontario. Between this fort and Montreal, there are three others, with the first being nearly opposite the English fort at Oswego. The distance from the fort on Lake Erie to Montreal is about six hundred miles, which they say takes no more than four weeks to travel in good weather, if they use barks or large vessels to cross the lake. But if they come in canoes, it will take five or six weeks because they have to stay close to the shore.

5th. Rained excessively all day, which prevented our travelling. Captain Joncaire sent for the half king, as he had but just heard that he came with me. He affected to be much concerned that I did not make free to bring them in before. I excused it in the best manner of which I was capable, and told him, I did not think their company agreeable, as I had heard him say a good deal in dispraise of Indians in general: but another motive prevented me from bringing them into his company: I knew that he was an interpreter, and a person of very great influence among the Indians, and had lately used all possible means to draw them over to his interest; therefore, I was desirous of giving him no opportunity that could be avoided.

5th. It rained heavily all day, which stopped us from traveling. Captain Joncaire sent for the half king, as he had just heard that he came with me. He pretended to be very concerned that I hadn’t freely brought them in before. I explained as best as I could and told him I didn’t find their company agreeable, since I had heard him speak quite a bit negatively about Indians in general. But there was another reason I hadn’t brought them into his presence: I knew he was an interpreter and had a lot of influence among the Indians, and he had recently tried hard to win them over to his side; so I wanted to avoid giving him any opportunity I could help.

When they came in, there was great pleasure expressed at seeing them. He wondered how they could be so near without coming to visit him, made several trifling presents, and applied liquor so fast, that they were soon rendered incapable of the business they came about, notwithstanding the caution which was given.

When they arrived, everyone was really happy to see them. He was curious how they could be so close without stopping by to see him. He gave them a few small gifts and poured drinks so quickly that they soon became too tipsy to do what they had come for, despite the warnings that had been given.

6th. The half king came to my tent, quite sober, and insisted very much that I should stay and hear what he had to say to the French. I fain would have prevented him from speaking any thing until he came to the commandant, but could not prevail. He told me, that at this place a council fire was kindled, where all their business with these people was to be transacted, and that the management of the Indian affairs was left solely to Monsieur Joncaire. As I was desirous of knowing the issue of this, I agreed to stay; but sent our horses a little way up French creek, to raft over and encamp; which I knew would make it near night.

6th. The half king came to my tent, completely sober, and strongly insisted that I should stay and listen to what he had to say to the French. I really wanted to stop him from saying anything until he met with the commandant, but I couldn't convince him. He informed me that a council fire was lit at this location, where all their business with these people would take place, and that the management of Indian affairs was entirely up to Monsieur Joncaire. Since I was eager to find out the outcome of this, I agreed to stay; however, I sent our horses a little way up French Creek to raft over and set up camp, knowing it would be nearly night by the time we got there.

About ten o'clock, they met in council. The king spoke much the same as he had before done to the general; and offered the French speech belt which had before been demanded, with the marks of four towns on it, which Monsieur Joncaire refused to receive, but desired him to carry it to the fort to the commander.

About ten o'clock, they gathered for a meeting. The king spoke much like he had previously to the general and offered the French speech belt that had been requested before, featuring the symbols of four towns on it. However, Monsieur Joncaire declined to accept it and asked the king to take it to the fort for the commander.

7th. Monsieur La Force, Commissary of the French stores, and three other soldiers, came over to accompany us up. We found it extremely difficult to get the Indians off to-day, as every stratagem had been used to prevent their going up with me. I had last night left John Davidson (the Indian interpreter) whom I brought with me from town, and strictly charged him not to be out of their company, as I could not get them over to my tent; for they had some business with Kustologa, chiefly to know why he did not deliver up the French speech belt which he had in keeping: but I was obliged to send Mr. Gist over to-day to fetch them, which he did with great persuasion.

7th. Monsieur La Force, the French stores' officer, and three other soldiers came along to help us. We found it really tough to get the Indians to leave today, as every trick had been tried to stop them from going with me. Last night, I had left John Davidson (the Indian interpreter) whom I brought from town and firmly told him to stay close to them, since I couldn’t get them to my tent; they had some unfinished business with Kustologa, mainly to ask why he hadn’t handed over the French speech belt he was holding. I had to send Mr. Gist over today to bring them, and he managed to do so with a lot of convincing.

At twelve o'clock, we set out for the fort, and were prevented from arriving there until the eleventh by excessive rains, snows, and bad travelling through many mires and swamps; these we were obliged to pass to avoid crossing the creek, which was impossible, either by fording or rafting, the water was so high and rapid.

At twelve o'clock, we headed out for the fort, but we didn't get there until eleven o'clock due to heavy rain, snow, and difficult travel through numerous muddy areas and swamps. We had to go through these to avoid crossing the creek, which was impossible to ford or raft because the water was too high and fast.

We passed over much good land since we left Venango, and through several extensive and very rich meadows, one of which, I believe, was nearly four miles in length, and considerably wide in some places.

We passed over a lot of good land since we left Venango, and through several large and very fertile meadows, one of which, I think, was almost four miles long and quite wide in some areas.

12th. I prepared early to wait upon the commander, and was received, and conducted to him by the second officer in command. I acquainted him with my business, and offered my commission and letter: both of which he desired me to keep until the arrival of Monsieur Reparti, captain at the next fort, who was sent for and expected every hour.

12th. I got ready early to meet the commander and was taken to him by the second-in-command. I informed him about why I was there and presented my commission and letter, both of which he asked me to hold onto until Monsieur Reparti, the captain at the next fort, arrived, as he was being summoned and was expected any hour.

This commander is a knight of the military order of St. Louis, and named Legardeur de St. Pierre. He is an elderly gentleman, and has much the air of a soldier. He was sent over to take the command, immediately upon the death of the late general, and arrived here about seven days before me.

This commander is a knight of the military order of St. Louis, named Legardeur de St. Pierre. He is an older gentleman and definitely looks like a soldier. He was sent over to take command right after the previous general died and arrived here about a week before I did.

At two o'clock, the gentleman who was sent for arrived, when I offered the letter, &c. again, which they received, and adjourned into a private apartment for the captain to translate, who understood a little English. After he had done it, the commander desired I would walk in and bring my interpreter to peruse and correct it; which I did.

At two o'clock, the gentleman who was called for arrived, and I offered the letter, etc., again. They accepted it and moved into a private room for the captain to translate, as he understood some English. Once he finished, the commander asked me to come in with my interpreter to read and correct it, which I did.

13th. The chief officers retired to hold a council of war, which gave me an opportunity of taking the dimensions of the fort, and making what observations I could.

13th. The main officers went off to have a war council, which gave me a chance to measure the fort and make whatever observations I could.

It is situated on the south, or west fork of French creek, near the water; and is almost surrounded by the creek, and a small branch of it which forms a kind of island. Four houses compose the sides. The bastions are made of piles driven into the ground, standing more than twelve feet above it, and sharp at top; with port holes cut for cannon, and loop holes for the small arms to fire through. There are eight six pound pieces mounted in each bastion, and one piece of four pound before the gate. In the bastions are a guard house, chapel, doctor's lodging, and the commander's private store: round which are laid platforms for the cannon and men to stand on. There are several barracks without the fort, for the soldiers' dwelling, covered, some with bark, and some with boards, made chiefly of logs. There are also several other houses, such as stables, smith's shop, &c.

It is located on the south or west fork of French Creek, near the water, and is almost surrounded by the creek and a small branch that creates a sort of island. Four houses make up the sides. The bastions are built from piles driven into the ground, rising over twelve feet above it, and pointed at the top; with port holes cut for cannons and loop holes for small arms to fire through. Each bastion has eight six-pound cannons mounted, and there's one four-pound cannon in front of the gate. Inside the bastions are a guardhouse, chapel, doctor's quarters, and the commander's private store, around which platforms are laid for the cannons and soldiers to stand on. There are several barracks outside the fort for the soldiers to live in, some covered with bark and others with boards, mainly made from logs. There are also several other buildings, like stables, a blacksmith shop, etc.

I could get no certain account of the number of men here; but according to the best judgment I could form, there are an hundred, exclusive of officers, of which there are many. I also gave orders to the people who were with me, to take an exact account of the canoes which were hauled up to convey their forces down in the spring. This they did, and told fifty of birch bark, and an hundred and seventy of pine; besides many others which were blocked out, in readiness for being made.

I couldn't get a clear count of the number of men here, but based on my best estimate, there are about a hundred, not including the officers, of which there are quite a few. I also instructed the people with me to take a precise count of the canoes that were pulled up to transport their troops in the spring. They did that and reported fifty made of birch bark and one hundred and seventy made of pine, along with many others that had been shaped and were ready to be finished.

14th. As the snow increased very fast, and our horses daily became weaker, I sent them off unloaded, under the care of Barnaby Currin and two others, to make all convenient despatch to Venango, and there to wait our arrival, if there was a prospect of the river's freezing: if not, then to continue down to Shanapin's town, at the forks of Ohio, and there to wait until we came to cross the Alleghany; intending myself to go down by water, as I had the offer of a canoe or two.

14th. As the snow continued to pile up quickly and our horses got weaker each day, I sent them off without any loads, with Barnaby Currin and two others, to hurry to Venango and wait for us there if it looked like the river might freeze. If that wasn't going to happen, they were to go down to Shanapin's town at the forks of the Ohio and wait until we arrived to cross the Alleghany. I planned to make my way down by water since I had the option of one or two canoes.

As I found many plots concerted to retard the Indians' business, and prevent their returning with me, I endeavoured all that lay in my power to frustrate their schemes, and hurried them on to execute their intended design. They accordingly pressed for admittance this evening, which at length was granted them, privately, to the commander and one or two other officers. The half king told me that he offered the wampum to the commander, who evaded taking it, and made many fair promises of love and friendship; said he wanted to live in peace and trade amicably with them, as a proof of which, he would send some goods immediately down to the Loggstown for them. But I rather think the design of that is to bring away all our straggling traders they meet with, as I privately understood they intended to carry an officer, &c. with them. And what rather confirms this opinion, I was inquiring of the commander by what authority he had made prisoners of several of our English subjects. He told me that the country belonged to them; that no Englishman had a right to trade upon those waters; and that he had orders to make every person prisoner who attempted it on the Ohio, or the waters of it.

As I discovered that many plans were being made to hinder the Indians' business and prevent them from coming back with me, I did everything I could to foil their schemes and pushed them to carry out their intended plan. They requested to meet this evening, which was eventually granted to the commander and a couple of other officers in private. The half king informed me that he offered wampum to the commander, who avoided accepting it and made many nice promises of love and friendship. He said he wanted to live peacefully and trade amicably with them, and as proof, he would send some goods immediately down to Loggstown for them. However, I suspect the real purpose of that is to gather up all our wandering traders they encounter, as I privately learned they intended to take an officer, etc., with them. To reinforce this belief, I asked the commander on what authority he had taken several of our English subjects as prisoners. He told me that the land belonged to them, that no Englishman had the right to trade on those waters, and that he had orders to arrest anyone who tried to do so on the Ohio or its waters.

I inquired of Captain Reparti about the boy that was carried by this place, as it was done while the command devolved on him, between the death of the late general, and the arrival of the present. He acknowledged that a boy had been carried past: and that the Indians had two or three white men's scalps, (I was told by some of the Indians at Venango, eight) but pretended to have forgotten the name of the place where the boy came from, and all the particular facts, though he had questioned him for some hours, as they were carrying past. I likewise inquired what they had done with John Trotter and James M'Clocklan, two Pennsylvania traders, whom they had taken with all their goods. They told me that they had been sent to Canada, but were now returned home.

I asked Captain Reparti about the boy who was taken through this area while he was in charge, following the death of the previous general and before the current one arrived. He confirmed that a boy had been taken past and mentioned that the Indians had two or three white men's scalps (some Indians at Venango said it was eight), but he feigned forgetfulness about the name of the place the boy came from and all the details, even though he had questioned him for several hours while they were passing by. I also asked what had happened to John Trotter and James M'Clocklan, two Pennsylvania traders who had been captured along with all their goods. They told me that they had been sent to Canada but had since returned home.

This evening, I received an answer to his honour the governor's letter, from the commandant.

This evening, I got a response to the governor's letter from the commandant.

15th. The commandant ordered a plentiful store of liquor, provision, &c. to be put on board our canoes, and appeared to be extremely complaisant, though he was exerting every artifice which he could invent to set our Indians at variance with us, to prevent their going until after our departure: presents, rewards, and every thing which could be suggested by him or his officers. I can not say that ever in my life I suffered so much anxiety as I did in this affair. I saw that every stratagem, which the most fruitful brain could invent, was practised to win the half king to their interest; and that leaving him there was giving them the opportunity they aimed at. I went to the half king and pressed him in the strongest terms to go; he told me that the commandant would not discharge him until the morning. I then went to the commandant, and desired him to do their business, and complained of ill treatment; for keeping them, as they were part of my company, was detaining me. This he promised not to do, but to forward my journey as much as he could. He protested he did not keep them, but was ignorant of the cause of their stay; though I soon found it out. He had promised them a present of guns, &c. if they would wait until the morning. As I was very much pressed by the Indians to wait this day for them, I consented, on a promise that nothing should hinder them in the morning.

15th. The commandant ordered a large supply of liquor, food, etc., to be loaded onto our canoes and seemed very accommodating, even though he was using every trick he could think of to create conflict between our Indians and us to stop them from leaving until after we did. He offered gifts, rewards, and anything else he or his officers could suggest. I can't say I've ever felt as anxious as I did during this situation. I noticed that every strategy imaginable was being used to sway the half king in their favor, and leaving him behind would give them the chance they wanted. I approached the half king and insisted strongly that he should leave, but he told me the commandant wouldn’t let him go until the morning. I then spoke to the commandant and asked him to handle their situation, complaining about their mistreatment; keeping them there was delaying me. He promised he wouldn’t do that and would help expedite my journey as much as possible. He claimed he wasn’t holding them back but was unaware of why they were still there, although I quickly figured it out. He had promised them a reward of guns, etc., if they waited until morning. Since the Indians were very eager for them to stay today, I agreed, based on the promise that nothing would delay them in the morning.

16th. The French were not slack in their inventions to keep the Indians this day also. But as they were obliged, according to promise, to give the present, they then endeavoured to try the power of liquor, which I doubt not would have prevailed at any other time than this: but I urged and insisted with the king so closely upon his word, that he refrained, and set off with us as he had engaged.

16th. The French were quick to come up with ideas to keep the Indians this day as well. However, since they were obligated by their promise to give the gift, they then tried to use alcohol. I’m sure it would have worked any other time, but I pressed the king so firmly on his word that he held back and left with us as he had promised.

We had a tedious and very fatiguing passage down the creek. Several times we had like to have been staved against rocks; and many times were obliged all hands to get out and remain in the water half an hour or more, getting over the shoals. At one place, the ice had lodged, and made it impassable by water; we were, therefore, obliged to carry our canoe across the neck of land, a quarter of a mile over. We did not reach Venango until the 22d, where we met with our horses.

We had a long and exhausting journey down the creek. Several times we almost crashed into rocks, and many times we had to get everyone out and stay in the water for half an hour or more to get over the shallow parts. At one spot, the ice had built up and made it impossible to pass by water, so we had to carry our canoe across a quarter-mile stretch of land. We didn't reach Venango until the 22nd, where we met up with our horses.

This creek is extremely crooked. I dare say the distance between the fort and Venango, can not be less than one hundred and thirty miles to follow the meanders.

This creek is really winding. I’d say the distance between the fort and Venango can’t be less than one hundred and thirty miles if you follow the twists and turns.

23d. When I got things ready to set off, I sent for the half king, to know whether he intended to go with us, or by water. He told me that White Thunder had hurt himself much, and was sick, and unable to walk; therefore he was obliged to carry him down in a canoe. As I found he intended to stay here a day or two, and knew that Monsieur Joncaire would employ every scheme to set him against the English, as he had before done, I told him, I hoped he would guard against his flattery, and let no fine speeches influence him in their favour. He desired I might not be concerned, for he knew the French too well, for any thing to engage him in their favour; and that though he could not go down with us, he yet would endeavour to meet at the forks with Joseph Campbell, to deliver a speech for me to carry to his honour the governor. He told me he would order the Young Hunter to attend us, and get provisions, &c. if wanted.

23d. When I got everything ready to leave, I called for the half king to find out if he planned to join us or travel by water. He told me that White Thunder had injured himself badly and was sick, unable to walk; so he had to carry him down in a canoe. Since I realized he intended to stay here for a day or two, and I knew that Monsieur Joncaire would use every trick to turn him against the English, as he had done before, I warned him to be cautious of any flattery and not let smooth talk sway him in their favor. He assured me not to worry, as he knew the French too well to be influenced by them, and although he couldn't travel down with us, he would try to meet up at the forks with Joseph Campbell to deliver a message for me to take to the governor. He mentioned that he would arrange for the Young Hunter to join us and get provisions, etc., if we needed them.

Our horses were now so weak and feeble, and the baggage so heavy, (as we were obliged to provide all the necessaries which the journey would require) that we doubted much their performing it. Therefore, myself and others, except the drivers, who were obliged to ride, gave up our horses for packs, to assist along with the baggage. I put myself in an Indian walking dress, and continued with them three days, until I found there was no probability of their getting home in any reasonable time. The horses became less able to travel every day; the cold increased very fast; and the roads were becoming much worse by a deep snow, continually freezing: therefore, as I was uneasy to get back, to make report of my proceedings to his honour the governor, I determined to prosecute my journey, the nearest way through the woods, on foot.

Our horses were now so weak and frail, and the baggage was so heavy (since we had to carry all the essentials for the journey) that we seriously doubted they could make it. So, I and a few others, except for the drivers who needed to ride, swapped our horses for packs to help with the load. I put on an Indian walking outfit and traveled with them for three days until I realized there was no chance they would make it back home anytime soon. The horses were becoming less able to travel each day; the cold was getting worse quickly; and the roads were deteriorating with deep, freezing snow. So, feeling anxious to return and report my progress to the governor, I decided to continue my journey on foot the shortest way through the woods.

Accordingly, I left Mr. Vanbraam in charge of our baggage, with money and directions to provide necessaries from place to place for themselves and horses, and to make the most convenient despatch in travelling.

Accordingly, I left Mr. Vanbraam in charge of our luggage, with money and instructions to get supplies for themselves and the horses as needed, and to travel as efficiently as possible.

I took my necessary papers, pulled off my clothes, and tied myself up in a watch coat. Then, with gun in hand, and pack on my back, in which were my papers and provisions, I set out with Mr. Gist, fitted in the same manner, on Wednesday the 26th. The day following, just after we had passed a place called Murdering town, (where we intended to quit the path and steer across the country for Shanapin's town) we fell in with a party of French Indians, who had laid in wait for us. One of them fired at Mr. Gist or me, not fifteen steps off, but fortunately missed. We took this fellow into custody, and kept him until about nine o'clock at night, then let him go, and walked all the remaining part of the night without making any stop, that we might get the start, so far, as to be out of the reach of their pursuit the next day, since we were well assured they would follow our track as soon as it was light. The next day we continued travelling until quite dark, and got to the river about two miles above Shanapin's. We expected to have found the river frozen, but it was not, only about fifty yards from each shore. The ice, I suppose, had broken up above, for it was driving in vast quantities.

I grabbed my essential papers, stripped off my clothes, and wrapped myself in a long coat. Then, with a gun in hand and my backpack full of papers and supplies, I set off with Mr. Gist, who was dressed the same way, on Wednesday the 26th. The next day, just after we passed a place called Murdering Town (where we planned to leave the path and head across the country to Shanapin's Town), we ran into a group of French Indians who were waiting for us. One of them fired at Mr. Gist or me from less than fifteen steps away, but luckily missed. We captured this guy and held him until around nine o'clock at night, then let him go and walked the rest of the night without stopping so we could get far enough ahead to evade their pursuit the next day, knowing they would follow our trail as soon as it was light. The following day, we kept traveling until it was very dark and reached the river about two miles above Shanapin's. We expected the river to be frozen, but it wasn’t, only about fifty yards from each shore. I guess the ice must have broken up upstream because it was floating down in huge chunks.

There was no way for getting over but on a raft, which we set about, with but one poor hatchet, and finished just after sun setting. This was a whole day's work: we next got it launched, then went on board of it, and set off; but before we were half way over, we were jammed in the ice, in such a manner, that we expected every moment our raft to sink, and ourselves to perish. I put out my setting pole to try to stop the raft, that the ice might pass by, when the rapidity of the stream threw it with so much violence against the pole, that it jerked me out into ten feet water; but I fortunately saved myself by catching hold of one of the raft logs. Notwithstanding all our efforts, we could not get to either shore, but were obliged, as we were near an island, to quit our raft and make to it.

There was no way to get across except on a raft, which we started building with just one old hatchet, and we finished it just after sunset. It took the whole day’s work. Next, we launched it, climbed aboard, and set off; but before we were halfway across, we got stuck in the ice in such a way that we expected our raft to sink any moment and for us to drown. I extended my setting pole to try to stop the raft so the ice could pass by, but the current threw it against the pole with such force that it knocked me into ten feet of water. Luckily, I managed to grab onto one of the raft logs. Despite all our efforts, we couldn't reach either shore, so since we were close to an island, we had to abandon our raft and swim to it.

The cold was so extremely severe, that Mr. Gist had all his fingers, and some of his toes frozen, and the water was shut up so hard, that we found no difficulty in getting off the island on the ice in the morning, and went to Mr. Frazier's. We met here with twenty warriors, who were going to the southward to war; but coming to a place on the head of the great Kanawa, where they found seven people killed and scalped, (all but one woman with very light hair) they turned about and ran back, for fear the inhabitants should rise and take them as the authors of the murder. They report that the bodies were lying about the house, and some of them much torn and eaten by the hogs. By the marks which were left, they say they were French Indians of the Ottoway nation, &c. who did it.

The cold was so intense that Mr. Gist had all his fingers and some of his toes frozen. The water was frozen solid, so we had no trouble getting off the island on the ice in the morning and went to Mr. Frazier's. There, we met twenty warriors who were heading south to fight. However, when they reached a spot at the head of the great Kanawa and found seven people killed and scalped (except for one woman with very light hair), they turned around and ran back, fearing that the local people would accuse them of the murders. They reported that the bodies were scattered around the house, and some were badly torn and eaten by hogs. Based on the signs left behind, they concluded that it was the French Indians of the Ottoway nation who did it.

As we intended to take horses here, and it required some time to find them, I went up about three miles to the mouth of Yohogany, to visit queen Alliquippa, who had expressed great concern that we passed her in going to the fort. I made her a present of a watch coat and a bottle of rum, which latter was thought much the best present of the two.

As we planned to get horses here, and it took some time to find them, I traveled about three miles to the mouth of Yohogany to visit Queen Alliquippa, who had shown a lot of concern that we passed her on our way to the fort. I gave her a gift of a watch coat and a bottle of rum, which was considered the better gift of the two.

Tuesday, the first of January, we left Mr. Frazier's house, and arrived at Mr. Gist's, at Monongahela, the second, where I bought a horse, saddle, &c. The sixth, we met seventeen horses loaded with materials and stores for a fort at the forks of Ohio, and the day after, some families going out to settle. This day, we arrived at Wills' creek, after as fatiguing a journey as it is possible to conceive, rendered so by excessive bad weather. From the first day of December to the fifteenth, there was but one day on which it did not rain or snow incessantly; and throughout the whole journey, we met with nothing but one continued series of cold, wet weather, which occasioned very uncomfortable lodgings, especially after we had quitted our tent, which was some screen from the inclemency of it.

On Tuesday, January 1st, we left Mr. Frazier's house and arrived at Mr. Gist's place in Monongahela on the 2nd, where I bought a horse, saddle, etc. On the 6th, we encountered seventeen horses carrying supplies for a fort at the forks of Ohio, and the following day, we saw some families heading out to settle. That day, we reached Wills' Creek after an exhausting journey that was as difficult as you can imagine, made worse by really bad weather. From December 1st to the 15th, there was only one day without constant rain or snow; throughout the entire trip, we faced nothing but a nonstop stretch of cold, wet weather, which made for very uncomfortable sleeping arrangements, especially after we left our tent, which had provided some shelter from the harsh conditions.

On the 11th, I got to Belvoir, where I stopped one day to take necessary rest; and then set out and arrived in Williamsburg the 16th, when I waited upon his honour the governor, with the letter I had brought from the French commandant, and to give an account of the success of my proceedings. This I beg leave to do by offering the foregoing narrative, as it contains the most remarkable occurrences which happened in my journey.

On the 11th, I arrived at Belvoir, where I stayed for a day to rest. Then I set out and got to Williamsburg on the 16th, where I met with the governor to deliver the letter I received from the French commandant and to report on how my mission went. I would like to do that by presenting the narrative above, as it includes the most significant events from my journey.

I hope what has been said will be sufficient to make your honour satisfied with my conduct; for that was my aim in undertaking the journey, and chief study throughout the prosecution of it.

I hope what I've said is enough to assure you of my good intentions; that was my goal in taking this journey and my main focus the whole time I was carrying it out.


NOTE—No. II. See Page 10.

The author is indebted, for the letter alluded to, to the Editor of the Lancaster Journal.

The author is grateful to the Editor of the Lancaster Journal for the referenced letter.

Sir,—I am really sorry that I have it not in my power to answer your request, in a more satisfactory manner. If you had favoured me with the journal a few days sooner, I would have examined it carefully, and endeavoured to point out such errors as might conduce to your use, my advantage, and the public satisfaction; but now it is out of my power.

Mr.,—I’m really sorry that I can’t respond to your request in a more satisfying way. If you had sent me the journal a few days earlier, I would have examined it closely and tried to highlight any errors that could be useful for you, beneficial for me, and satisfying for the public; but now I can’t do that.

I had no time to make any remarks upon that piece which is called my journal. The enclosed are observations on the French notes. They are of no use to me separated, nor will they, I believe, be of any to you; yet I send them unconnected and incoherent as they were taken, for I have no opportunity to correct them.

I didn't have time to comment on what I call my journal. The enclosed are notes on the French observations. They’re not useful to me when they’re separate, and I doubt they’ll be of any use to you either; still, I’m sending them as they are—disconnected and jumbled, since I have no chance to organize them.

In regard to the journal, I can only observe in general, that I kept no regular one during that expedition: rough minutes of occurrences I certainly took, and find them as certainly and strangely metamorphosed—some parts left out which I remember were entered, and many things added that never were thought of; the names of men and things egregiously miscalled; and the whole of what I saw Englished, is very incorrect and nonsensical:—yet, I will not pretend to say that the little body who brought it to me, has not made a literal translation, and a good one.

As for the journal, I can only say that I didn’t keep a proper one during that trip. I definitely took rough notes about what happened, but they’ve turned out to be oddly changed—some things I remember writing are missing, and there are a lot of things included that I never thought of; names of people and places are glaringly wrong; and everything I did see is badly translated into English, making no sense at all. Still, I won’t claim that the person who brought it to me didn’t make a literal translation, and a decent one at that.

Short as my time is, I can not help remarking on Villiers' account of the battle of, and transactions at the Meadows, as it is very extraordinary, and not less erroneous than inconsistent. He says the French received the first fire. It is well known that we received it at six hundred paces distance. He also says, our fears obliged us to retreat in the most disorderly manner after the capitulation. How is this consistent with his other account? He acknowledges that we sustained the attack, warmly, from ten in the morning until dark, and that he called first to parley, which strongly indicates that we were not totally absorbed in fear. If the gentleman in his account had adhered to the truth, he must have confessed, that we looked upon his offer to parley as an artifice to get into and examine our trenches, and refused on this account, until they desired an officer might be sent to them, and gave their parole for his safe return. He might also, if he had been as great a lover of the truth as he was of vain glory, have said, that we absolutely refused their first and second proposals, and would consent to capitulate on no other terms than such as we obtained. That we were wilfully, or ignorantly deceived by our interpreter in regard to the word assassination, I do aver, and will to my dying moment; so will every officer that was present. The interpreter was a Dutchman, little acquainted with the English tongue, therefore might not advert to the tone and meaning of the word in English; but, whatever his motives were for so doing, certain it is, he called it the death, or the loss of the Sieur Jumonville. So we received and so we understood it, until to our great surprise and mortification, we found it otherwise in a literal translation. That we left our baggage and horses at the Meadows is certain; that there was not even a possibility to bring them away is equally certain, as we had every horse belonging to the camp killed or taken away during the action; so that it was impracticable to bring any thing off that our shoulders were not able to bear, and to wait there was impossible, for we had scarce three days provisions, and were seventy miles from a supply; yet, to say we came off precipitately is absolutely false; notwithstanding they did, contrary to articles, suffer their Indians to pillage our baggage, and commit all kinds of irregularity, we were with them until ten o'clock the next day; we destroyed our powder and other stores, nay, even our private baggage, to prevent its falling into their hands, as we could not bring it off. When we had got about a mile from the place of action, we missed two or three of the wounded, and sent a party back to bring them up-this is the party he speaks of. We brought them all safe off, and encamped within three miles of the Meadows. These are circumstances, I think, that make it evidently clear, that we were not very apprehensive of danger. The colours he speaks of to be left, was a large flag of immense size and weight; our regimental colours were brought off and are now in my possession. Their gasconades, and boasted clemency, must appear in the most ludicrous light to every considerate person who reads Villiers' journal;—such preparations for an attack, such vigour and intrepidity as he pretends to have conducted his march with, such revenge, as by his own account, appeared in his attack, considered, it will hardly be thought that compassion was his motive for calling a parley. But to sum up the whole, Mr. Villiers pays himself no great compliment, in saying, we were struck with a panic when matters were adjusted. We surely could not be afraid without cause, and if we had cause after capitulation, it was a reflection upon himself.

Short as my time is, I can't help noting Villiers' account of the battle and events at the Meadows, as it is both extraordinary and, at the same time, inconsistent. He claims the French fired first, but it’s well-known we were the ones who were fired upon from six hundred paces away. He also states that our fears forced us to retreat in complete disorder after the capitulation. How is this consistent with his other claims? He admits that we faced the attack fiercely from ten in the morning until dark, and that he was the first to call for a parley, which clearly indicates that we were not completely paralyzed by fear. If the gentleman in his account had stuck to the truth, he would have had to admit that we saw his offer to parley as a trick to sneak into and inspect our trenches, and we refused for that reason, until they asked for an officer to be sent to them and guaranteed his safe return. He might also have mentioned, if he truly loved the truth as much as he loved vain glory, that we outright rejected their first and second proposals and would only agree to terms that matched what we eventually received. I assert, and will maintain until my dying day, that we were willfully or mistakenly misled by our interpreter regarding the word assassination, and every officer present will agree. The interpreter was a Dutchman who didn’t know English well, so he might not have understood the tone and meaning of the word in English. Whatever his reasons were, he referred to it as the death or the loss of the Sieur Jumonville. This is how we received it and understood it, until we were shocked and disappointed to find out the literal translation was different. It’s true we left our baggage and horses at the Meadows; it’s also true there was no way to take them with us, since every horse in the camp was either killed or taken during the battle. Therefore, it was impractical to carry anything that we couldn't manage, and waiting there was not an option because we had barely three days’ worth of food and were seventy miles away from resupply. However, to claim we left in a panic is absolutely false; despite their actions, violating the agreement by letting their Indians loot our baggage and commit various irregularities, we remained with them until ten o'clock the next day. We destroyed our powder and other supplies, and even our personal belongings, to prevent them from falling into their hands, as we couldn’t carry anything away. When we had moved about a mile from the battlefield, we realized two or three of the wounded were missing, and we sent a party back to retrieve them—this is the group he mentions. We brought them all back safely and set up camp within three miles of the Meadows. These circumstances clearly show that we were not particularly fearful of danger. The colors he refers to being left behind were a large, heavy flag; our regimental colors were successfully brought back and are now in my possession. Their boasts of valor and supposed clemency appear utterly ridiculous to anyone who reads Villiers' journal—his claims of preparation for an attack, the vigor and courage he supposedly showed during his march, and the revenge he describes in his assault all suggest that compassion was not his motive for calling for a parley. In short, Mr. Villiers does not pay himself a great compliment by saying we panicked once matters were settled. We surely couldn't be afraid without reason, and if we had cause to be fearful after capitulation, that reflects poorly on him.

I do not doubt, but your good nature will excuse the badness of my paper, and the incoherence of my writing—think you see me in a public house in a crowd, surrounded with noise, and you hit my case. You do me particular honour in offering your friendship: I wish I may be so happy as always to merit it, and deserve your correspondence, which I should be glad to cultivate.

I have no doubt that your kindness will overlook the flaws in my writing and the lack of coherence in my paper—imagine me in a busy bar, surrounded by noise, and you’ll get the picture. I truly appreciate your offer of friendship; I hope I can always live up to it and earn your correspondence, which I would love to nurture.


NOTE—No. III. See Page 51.

Sir,—We your most obedient and affectionate officers, beg leave to express our great concern, at the disagreeable news we have received of your determination to resign the command of that corps, in which we have under you long served.

Dude,—We, your most devoted and caring officers, would like to express our deep concern about the unfortunate news we’ve received regarding your decision to step down from the command of the unit we have served under you for so long.

The happiness we have enjoyed, and the honour we have acquired together, with the mutual regard that has always subsisted between you and your officers, have implanted so sensible an affection in the minds of us all, that we can not be silent on this critical occasion.

The happiness we've shared and the respect we've earned together, along with the mutual appreciation that has always existed between you and your team, have created such a strong bond in all our minds that we cannot remain silent during this important moment.

In our earliest infancy you took us under your tuition, trained us up in the practice of that discipline, which alone can constitute good troops, from the punctual observance of which you never suffered the least deviation.

In our earliest infancy, you took us under your guidance, training us in the discipline that is essential for good troops, from which you never allowed the slightest deviation.

Your steady adherence to impartial justice, your quick discernment, and invariable regard to merit, wisely intended to inculcate those genuine sentiments of true honour and passion for glory, from which the greatest military achievements have been derived, first heightened our natural emulation and our desire to excel. How much we improved by those regulations and your own example, with what alacrity we have hitherto discharged our duty, with what cheerfulness we have encountered the severest toils, especially while under your particular directions, we submit to yourself, and natter ourselves that we have in a great measure answered your expectations.

Your consistent commitment to fair justice, your quick insight, and your unwavering focus on merit have effectively instilled in us the true values of honor and ambition for greatness, which have led to the most remarkable military accomplishments. This has increased our natural drive to compete and our desire to excel. We believe we have significantly improved due to those regulations and your example, how eagerly we've fulfilled our duties, and how cheerfully we've faced the toughest challenges, especially under your specific guidance. We present this to you, hoping we have largely met your expectations.

Judge, then, how sensibly we must be affected with the loss of such an excellent commander, such a sincere friend, and so affable a companion. How rare is it to find those amiable qualifications blended together in one man! How great the loss of such a man! Adieu to that superiority, which the enemy have granted us over other troops, and which even the regulars and provincials have done us the honour publicly to acknowledge! Adieu to that strict discipline and order, which you have always maintained! Adieu to that happy union and harmony, which have been our principal cement!

Consider how deeply we must feel the loss of such an outstanding leader, such a genuine friend, and such a friendly companion. It’s so uncommon to find those admirable qualities combined in one person! What a significant loss this is! Farewell to the advantage the enemy has recognized we had over other forces, which even the regulars and provincials have publicly acknowledged! Farewell to the strong discipline and order that you have always upheld! Farewell to the happy unity and harmony that have been our main strength!

It gives us additional sorrow, when we reflect, to find our unhappy country will receive a loss no less irreparable than our own. Where will it meet a man so experienced in military affairs—one so renowned for patriotism, conduct, and courage? Who has so great a knowledge of the enemy we have to deal with?—who so well acquainted with their situation and strength?—who so much respected by the soldiery?—who, in short, so able to support the military character of Virginia?

It adds to our sadness to realize that our troubled country will face a loss just as irreversible as our own. Where will it find a leader so skilled in military matters—one so famous for patriotism, behavior, and bravery? Who has such an extensive understanding of the enemy we’re up against?—who knows their position and strength so well?—who is so respected by the troops?—who, in short, is so capable of upholding the military reputation of Virginia?

Your approved love to your king and country, and your uncommon perseverance in promoting the honour and true interest of the service, convince us that the most cogent reasons only could induce you to quit it; yet we, with the greatest deference, presume to intreat you to suspend those thoughts for another year, and to lead us on to assist in the glorious work of extirpating our enemies, towards which, so considerable advances have been already made. In you, we place the most implicit confidence. Your presence only will cause a steady firmness and vigour to actuate in every breast, despising the greatest dangers, and thinking light of toils and hardships, while led on by the man we know and love.

Your dedicated loyalty to your king and country, along with your exceptional commitment to promoting the honor and true interests of the service, makes it clear that only the strongest reasons could lead you to step away from it. Still, with the utmost respect, we kindly ask you to put those thoughts on hold for one more year and to guide us in the noble effort to defeat our enemies, towards which we have already made significant progress. We have complete trust in you. Your presence alone will inspire steadfastness and energy in everyone, making us fearless of the greatest dangers and undaunted by hardships, all while being led by someone we know and cherish.

But if we must be so unhappy as to part, if the exigencies of your affairs force you to abandon us, we beg it as our last request, that you will recommend some person most capable to command, whose military knowledge, whose honour, whose conduct, and whose disinterested principles, we may depend on.

But if we have to be so unhappy as to part, if the demands of your situation force you to leave us, we ask as our last request that you recommend someone very capable to lead, someone whose military expertise, honor, conduct, and selfless principles we can rely on.

Frankness, sincerity, and a certain openness of soul, are the true characteristics of an officer, and we flatter ourselves that you do not think us capable of saying any thing contrary to the purest dictates of our minds. Fully persuaded of this, we beg leave to assure you, that, as you have hitherto been the actuating soul of our whole corps, we shall at all times pay the most invariable regard to your will and pleasure, and will always be happy to demonstrate by our actions with how much respect and esteem we are, &c.

Being straightforward, genuine, and open-hearted are the real qualities of an officer, and we hope you believe that we would never say anything that goes against our honest thoughts. Fully confident in this, we want to assure you that since you have always been the driving force behind our entire team, we will consistently respect your wishes and will always be pleased to show through our actions just how much we value and admire you, etc.


NOTE—No. IV. See Page 54.

The delegates of the United Colonies of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the counties of Newcastle, Kent and Sussex on Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina:

The delegates from the United Colonies of New Hampshire, Massachusetts Bay, Rhode Island, Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, the counties of Newcastle, Kent, and Sussex in Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina:

To George Washington, esquire.

To George Washington, Esq.

We, reposing special trust and confidence in your patriotism, valour, conduct, and fidelity, do, by these presents constitute and appoint you to be general and commander-in-chief of the army of the United Colonies, and of all the forces now raised, or to be raised by them, and of all others who shall voluntarily offer their service, and join the said army for the defence of American liberty, and for repelling every hostile invasion thereof: and you are hereby invested with full power and authority to act as you shall think for the good and welfare of the service.

We, placing great trust and confidence in your patriotism, bravery, behavior, and loyalty, hereby appoint you as the general and commander-in-chief of the army of the United Colonies, including all forces currently raised or to be raised by them, as well as anyone else who voluntarily offers their service and joins the army to defend American liberty and repel any hostile invasion. You are given full power and authority to act as you see fit for the good and welfare of the service.

And we do hereby strictly charge and require all officers and soldiers under your command, to be obedient to your orders, and diligent in the exercise of their several duties.

And we now strongly instruct and require all officers and soldiers under your command to follow your orders and be committed to their individual responsibilities.

And we also enjoin and require you to be careful in executing the great trust reposed in you, by causing strict discipline and order to be observed in the army, and that the soldiers be duly exercised and provided with all convenient necessaries.

And we also ask and require you to be mindful in carrying out the significant trust placed in you, by ensuring that strict discipline and order are maintained in the army, and that the soldiers are properly trained and supplied with all necessary resources.

And you are to regulate your conduct in every respect by the rules and discipline of war, (as herewith given you) and punctually to observe and follow such orders and directions from time to time as you shall receive from this or a future congress of these United Colonies, or committee of congress.

And you are expected to conduct yourself in every way according to the rules and discipline of war, (as provided here) and to consistently follow the orders and instructions that you receive periodically from this or any future congress of these United Colonies, or from a committee of congress.

This commission to continue in force, until revoked by us, or a future congress.

This commission will remain in effect until we revoke it or a future congress does.


NOTE—No. V. See Page 78.

This letter is so truly characteristic of the writer, and treats in a manner so peculiar to himself, the measures of congress on this subject, that, although it may not be immediately connected with the Life of General Washington, the reader will not be displeased with its insertion.

This letter perfectly reflects the writer's style and addresses Congress's measures on this topic in a way that's uniquely his own. Even though it may not be directly related to General Washington's Life, the reader will likely appreciate its inclusion.

Stamford, January 22, 1779.

Stamford, January 22, 1779.

Sir,—As General Washington has informed the congress of his motives for detaching me, it is needless to trouble you upon the subject. I am therefore only to inform you that I have collected a body of about twelve hundred men from the colony of Connecticut, whose zeal and ardour demonstrated on this occasion can not be sufficiently praised. With this body I am marching directly to New York to execute the different purposes for which I am detached. I am sensible, sir, that nothing can carry the air of greater presumption than a servant intruding his opinion unasked upon his master, but at the same time there are certain seasons when the real danger of the master may not only excuse, but render laudable, the servant's officiousness. I therefore flatter myself that the congress will receive with indulgence and lenity the opinion I shall offer. The scheme of simply disarming the tories seems to me totally ineffectual; it will only embitter their minds and add virus to their venom. They can, and will, always be supplied with fresh arms by the enemy. That of seizing the most dangerous will, I apprehend, from the vagueness of the instruction, be attended with some bad consequences, and can answer no good one. It opens so wide a door for partiality and prejudice to the different congresses and committees on the continent, that much discord and animosity will probably ensue; it being next to impossible to distinguish who are, and who are not the most dangerous. The plan of explaining to these deluded people the justice and merits of the American cause is certainly generous and humane, but I am afraid, will be fruitless. They are so riveted in their opinions, that I am persuaded should an angel descend from heaven with his golden trumpet, and ring in their ears that their conduct was criminal, he would be disregarded. I had lately myself an instance of their infatuation which, if it is not impertinent, I will relate. At Newport I took the liberty, without any authority but the conviction of necessity, to administer a very strong oath to some of the leading tories, for which liberty I humbly ask pardon of the congress. One article of this oath was to take arms in defence of their country, if called upon by the voice of the congress. To this Colonel Wanton and others flatly refused their assent; to take arms against their sovereign, they said, was too monstrous an impiety. I asked them if they had lived at the time of the revolution whether they would have been revolutionists—their answers were at first evasive, circuitous, and unintelligible, but, by fixing them down precisely to the question, I at length drew from them a positive confession that no violence, no provocation on the part of the court, could prevail upon them to act with the continent. Such, I am afraid, is the creed and principles of the whole party great and small.—Sense, reason, argument, and eloquence, have been expended in vain; and in vain you may still argue and reason to the end of time. Even the common feelings and resentments of humanity have not aroused them, but rather with a malignant pleasure they have beheld the destruction of their fellow-citizens and relations. But I am running into declamation, perhaps impertinent and presuming, when I ought to confine myself to the scheme I submit to your consideration. It is, sir, in the first place, to disarm all the manifestly disaffected, as well of the lower as the higher class, not on the principle of putting them in a state of impotence (for this I observed before will not be the case) but to supply our troops with arms of which they stand in too great need. Secondly, to appraise their estates and oblige them to deposite at least the value of one half of their respective property in the hands of the continental congress as a security for their good behaviour. And lastly, to administer the strongest oath that can be devised to act offensively and defensively in support of the common rights. I confess that men so eaten up with bigotry, as the bulk of them appear to be, will not consider themselves as bound by this oath; particularly as it is in some measure forced, they will argue that it is by no means obligatory; but if I mistake not, it will be a sort of criterion by which you will be able to distinguish the desperate fanatics from those who are reclaimable. The former must of course be secured and carried to some interior parts of the continent where they can not be dangerous. This mode of proceeding I conceive (if any can) will be effectual—but whether it meets with the approbation or disapprobation of the congress, I most humbly conjure them not to attribute the proposal to arrogance, or self-conceit, or pragmatical officiousness, but, at worst, to an intemperate zeal for the public service.

Sir,—Since General Washington has already informed Congress of his reasons for assigning me to this task, I won’t trouble you with that. I’m writing to let you know that I’ve gathered about twelve hundred men from Connecticut, whose enthusiasm and commitment in this situation deserve high praise. With this group, I’m heading straight to New York to accomplish the various tasks for which I’ve been assigned. I understand, sir, that it may come across as presumptuous for a subordinate to share opinions uninvited with a superior, but there are moments when the real dangers faced by a leader may not only justify but also make commendable the subordinate’s eagerness to help. Therefore, I hope Congress will receive my suggestions with kindness and leniency. The idea of merely disarming the loyalists seems totally ineffective to me; it will only foster resentment and worsen their hostility. They can, and will, always get resupplied with weapons by the enemy. As for the plan to seize the most dangerous individuals, I worry that the unclear instructions might lead to negative consequences and won’t produce any positive results. It opens the door wide for bias and prejudice among the various Congresses and committees across the continent, likely creating conflict and animosity since it’s nearly impossible to determine who poses the greatest threat. The strategy of explaining to these misguided individuals the justice and merits of the American cause is certainly noble and compassionate, but I fear it will be in vain. They’re so set in their beliefs that I’m convinced even if an angel descended from heaven with a golden trumpet to proclaim that their behavior was wrong, he would be ignored. Recently, I had a direct experience of their delusion which, if I’m not being inappropriate, I’ll share. In Newport, I took the liberty, out of necessity rather than authority, to insist on a very strong oath from some of the leading loyalists, for which I humbly apologize to Congress. One part of this oath was to take up arms in defense of their country if called upon by Congress. To this, Colonel Wanton and others outright refused, stating that taking arms against their sovereign was an unconscionable act. I asked them whether, had they lived during the Revolution, they would have been revolutionaries—their initial responses were vague, indirect, and unclear, but by pressing them directly on the question, I finally extracted a clear admission that no amount of violence or provocation by the crown would persuade them to act in solidarity with the continent. Such, I fear, is the mindset and belief system of the entire loyalist faction, large and small. —Common sense, reason, argument, and eloquence have been wasted; and arguing further will continue to be pointless. Even the basic emotions and concerns of humanity haven’t moved them; rather, they seem to take pleasure in the suffering of their fellow citizens and family. But I digress, perhaps unnecessarily and presumptuously, when I should stick to proposing the plan I have for your consideration. First, I suggest disarming all those who are clearly disloyal, from both lower and upper classes—not to render them powerless (as I mentioned before, this won't happen) but to provide our troops with much-needed weapons. Second, to assess their property and require them to deposit at least half the value of their possessions with the continental Congress as security for their good behavior. Finally, to demand the strongest oath possible to act both offensively and defensively in support of our shared rights. I admit that individuals so deeply rooted in their prejudices, as most of them seem, will likely not see themselves as bound by this oath; especially since it’s somewhat coerced, they may argue it isn't obligatory. However, if I’m not mistaken, it will serve as a way to differentiate the truly fanatical from those who could potentially be reformed. The former, of course, should be secured and relocated to parts of the continent where they can’t pose a threat. This approach, I believe (if any can work), will be effective—but whether it meets with Congress's approval or disapproval, I sincerely request that they do not attribute this proposal to arrogance, self-importance, or meddlesome eagerness, but, at worst, to a passionate commitment to serving the public good.

Notwithstanding the apparent slimness of the authority, as I am myself convinced that it is substantial, I think it my duty to communicate a circumstance to congress. I have with me here, sir, a deserter from Captain Wallace's ship before Newport. It is necessary to inform you that this Captain Wallace has the reputation of being the most imprudent and rash of all mortals—particularly when he is heated with wine, which, as reported, is a daily incident: that in these moments he blabs his most secret instructions even to the common men. This deserter, then, informs us that the captain a few days ago assembled the sailors and marines on the quarter-deck, and assured them, by way of encouragement, that they were to proceed very soon to New York, where they were to be joined by his majesty's most loyal subjects of White Plains, Poughkeepsie, and Long Island, and at the same time bestowed abundantly his curses on the admiral and general for their dilatoriness and scandalous conduct in not availing themselves sooner of the invitation they had received from the worthy gentlemen. The congress will make what comments they please on this information, which I must repeat I thought it my duty to communicate. Upon the whole, sir, you may be assured that it is the intention of the ministerialists to take possession, and immediately, of New York. The intercepted letters, the unguarded expressions of their officers, in their interviews with ours on the lines, but above all the manifest advantages resulting to their cause from this measure, put their intention beyond dispute. With submission therefore to the wisdom of the congress, it behooves them, I should think, not to lose a moment in securing this important post, which, if in the hands of the enemy, must cut the continent in twain, and render it almost impossible for the northern and southern colonies to support each other. This crisis, when every thing is at stake, is not a time to be over complacent to the timidity of the inhabitants of any particular spot. I have now under my command a respectable force adequate to the purpose of securing the place, and purging all its environs of traitors, on which subject I shall expect with impatience the determination of the congress. Their orders I hope to receive before or immediately on my arrival.

Despite the apparent weakness of my authority, I truly believe it is significant, so I feel it’s my responsibility to share something with Congress. I have with me a deserter from Captain Wallace's ship before Newport. It’s important to let you know that Captain Wallace is known for being reckless and thoughtless—especially when he’s had too much to drink, which, as I’ve heard, is a daily occurrence; during these times, he reveals his most confidential orders even to the lower-ranked crew. This deserter tells us that a few days ago, the captain gathered the sailors and marines on the quarter-deck and assured them, to boost their spirits, that they would soon head to New York, where they would meet His Majesty's loyal subjects from White Plains, Poughkeepsie, and Long Island. He also openly criticized the admiral and general for being slow and careless in not acting sooner on the invitation they had received from the gentlemen. Congress is free to respond however they see fit about this information, but I felt it was my duty to share it. Overall, you can be sure that the ministerialists intend to take control of New York right away. The intercepted letters, the careless comments from their officers during meetings with ours along the lines, and especially the clear benefits this would bring to their cause leave no doubt about their intentions. Therefore, with respect to Congress's judgment, I believe it’s crucial that they act immediately to secure this important location, which, if fallen to the enemy, would split the continent in two and make it nearly impossible for the northern and southern colonies to support one another. This critical moment, when everything is at stake, is not the time to be overly lenient towards the fears of the local residents. I currently command a respectable force capable of securing the area and removing any traitors from its surroundings, and I eagerly await Congress's decision on this matter. I hope to receive their orders before or right upon my arrival.

This instant, the enclosed, express from the provincial congress of New York, was delivered into my hands, but as these gentlemen probably are not fully apprised of the danger hanging over their heads, as I have received intelligence from the camp that the fleet is sailed, and that it is necessary to urge my march, I shall proceed with one division of the forces under my command to that city. A moment's delay may be fatal. The force I shall carry with me is not strong enough to act offensively, but just sufficient to secure the city against any immediate designs of the enemy. If this is to give umbrage, if the governor and captain of the man of war are pleased to construe this step as an act of positive hostility, if they are to prescribe what number of your troops are and what number are not to enter the city, all I can say is that New York must be considered as the minister's place, and not the continent. I must now, sir, beg pardon for the length of this letter, and more so, for the presumption in offering so freely my thoughts to the congress, from whom it is my duty simply to receive my orders, and as a servant and soldier strictly to obey; which none can do with greater ardour and affection than,

This moment, I received the enclosed message from the provincial congress of New York, but since these gentlemen may not fully understand the danger they’re in, as I’ve learned from the camp that the fleet has set sail, it’s essential that I move quickly. I will proceed with one division of the forces under my command to that city. A moment's delay could be disastrous. The force I’m taking isn’t strong enough to attack, but it is just enough to protect the city against any immediate enemy plans. If this upsets anyone, if the governor and the captain of the warship see this move as an outright act of hostility, if they try to dictate how many of your troops can enter the city, then all I can say is that New York must be viewed as the minister's territory, not part of the continent. I must now apologize for the length of this letter and even more so for the nerve to share my thoughts so openly with the congress, from whom I should merely receive my orders, and as a servant and soldier, strictly obey; which none can do with greater passion and commitment than I.

Sir,

Hey,

Your most obedient humble servant,

Your faithfully devoted servant,

CHARLES LEE.

CHARLES LEE.

To the honourable John Hancock, esquire, president of the continental congress.

To the honorable John Hancock, Esq., President of the Continental Congress.


NOTE—No. VI. See Page 153.

THE NAMES OF THE MEMBERS WHO SUBSCRIBED THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WERE AS FOLLOWS, VIZ:

THE NAMES OF THE MEMBERS WHO SIGNED THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WERE AS FOLLOWS:

New Hampshire.

Josiah Bartlett,
William Whipple,
Matthew Thornton.

Massachusetts Bay.

Samuel Adams,
John Adams,
Robert Treat Paine,
Elbridge Gerry.

Rhode Island, &c.

Stephen Hopkins,
William Ellery.

Connecticut.

Roger Sherman,
Samuel Huntington,
William Williams,
Oliver Wolcott.

New York.

William Floyd,
Philip Livingston,
Francis Lewis,
Lewis Morris.

New Jersey.

Richard Stockton,
John Witherspoon,
Francis Hopkinson,
John Hart,
Abram Clark.

Pennsylvania.

Robert Morris,
Benjamin Rush,
Benjamin Franklin,
John Morton,
George Clymer,
James Smith,
George Taylor,
James Wilson,
George Ross.

Delaware.

Cesar Rodney,
George Reed.

Maryland.

Samuel Chase,
William Paca,
Thomas Stone,
Charles Carroll, of Carrollton.

Virginia.

George Wythe,
Richard Henry Lee,
Thomas Jefferson,
Benjamin Harrison,
Thomas Nelson, jun.
Francis Lightfoot Lee,
Carter Braxton.

North Carolina.

William Hooper,
Joseph Hughes,
John Penn.

South Carolina.

Edward Rutledge,
Thomas Heyward, jun.
Thomas Lynch, jun.
Arthur Middleton.

Georgia.

Button Gwinn,
George Walton,
Lyman Hall.

New Hampshire.

Josiah Bartlett,
William Whipple,
Matthew Thornton.

Massachusetts Bay.

Samuel Adams,
John Adams,
Robert Treat Paine,
Elbridge Gerry.

Rhode Island, &c.

Stephen Hopkins,
William Ellery.

Connecticut.

Roger Sherman,
Samuel Huntington,
William Williams,
Oliver Wolcott.

New York.

William Floyd,
Philip Livingston,
Francis Lewis,
Lewis Morris.

New Jersey.

Richard Stockton,
John Witherspoon,
Francis Hopkinson,
John Hart,
Abram Clark.

Pennsylvania.

Robert Morris,
Benjamin Rush,
Benjamin Franklin,
John Morton,
George Clymer,
James Smith,
George Taylor,
James Wilson,
George Ross.

Delaware.

Cesar Rodney,
George Reed.

Maryland.

Samuel Chase,
William Paca,
Thomas Stone,
Charles Carroll, of Carrollton.

Virginia.

George Wythe,
Richard Henry Lee,
Thomas Jefferson,
Benjamin Harrison,
Thomas Nelson, Jr.
Francis Lightfoot Lee,
Carter Braxton.

North Carolina.

William Hooper,
Joseph Hughes,
John Penn.

South Carolina.

Edward Rutledge,
Thomas Heyward, Jr.
Thomas Lynch, Jr.
Arthur Middleton.

Georgia.

Button Gwinn,
George Walton,
Lyman Hall.

 

The people of the United States have taken such universal interest in the composition of this celebrated instrument as to excuse a more minute attention to it than has been bestowed on the other cotemporaneous state papers.

The people of the United States have shown such widespread interest in the making of this famous instrument that it justifies a closer look at it than what has been given to other contemporary state papers.

Mr. Jefferson has preserved a copy of the original draft as reported by the committee, with the amendments made to it in congress, which has been published in his correspondence. The following is extracted from that work.

Mr. Jefferson has kept a copy of the original draft as reported by the committee, along with the amendments made in Congress, which has been published in his correspondence. The following is taken from that work.

 

Mr. Jefferson's draft as reported by the committee. As amended by congress.
A declaration by the representatives of the United States of America in general congress assembled. A declaration by the representatives of the United States of America in congress assembled.
When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect for the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. Not altered.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with inherent and inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organising its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence indeed will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations begun at a distinguished period and pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferings of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to expunge their former systems of government. The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of unremitting injuries and usurpations among which appears no solitary fact to contradict the uniform tenor of the rest, but all have in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world, for the truth of which we pledge a faith yet unsullied by falsehood. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organising its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence indeed will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies, and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present king of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this let facts be submitted to a candid world.
He has refused his assent to laws the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. Not altered.
He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended he has utterly neglected to attend to them. Not altered.
He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them, and formidable to tyrants only. Not altered.
He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depositary of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. Not altered.
He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly and continually, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.
He has refused for a long time after such dissolutions to cause others to be elected, whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise, the state remaining, in the mean time, exposed to the dangers of invasion from without and convulsions within. Not altered.
He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for the naturalization of foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands. Not altered.
He has suffered the administration of justice totally to cease in some of these states, refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers. He has obstructed the administration of justice by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.
He has made our judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He has made judges dependent on his will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of new offices, by a self-assumed power, and sent hither swarms of new officers to harass our people and eat out their substance He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of new officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.
He has kept among us in times of peace standing armies and ships of war without the consent of our legislatures. He has kept among us in times of peace standing armies without the consent of our legislatures.
He has affected to render the military independence of and superior to the civil power. Not altered.
He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitutions and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation for quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; for protecting by a mock trial from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us of the benefits of trial by jury; for transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offences; for abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighbouring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these states; for taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; for suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitutions and unacknowledged by our laws, giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation for quartering large bodies of armed troops among us; for protecting by a mock trial from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states; for cutting off our trade with all parts of the world; for imposing taxes on us without our consent; for depriving us in many cases of the benefits of trial by jury; for transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offences; for abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighbouring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries, so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these colonies; for taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments; for suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.
He has abdicated government here, withdrawing his governors and declaring us out of his allegiance and protection. He has abdicated government here by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.
He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns and destroyed the lives of our people. Not altered.
He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy unworthy the head of a civilized nation. He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, destruction and tyranny already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.
He has constrained our fellow-citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands. Not altered.
He has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of the frontiers the merciless Indian savages whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions of existence. He has excited domestic insurrections among us and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of the frontiers the merciless Indian savages whose known rule of warfare is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes, and conditions.
He has excited treasonable insurrections of our fellow-citizens, with the allurements of forfeiture and confiscation of our property. Struck out.
He has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating and carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. This piratical warfare, the opprobrium of INFIDEL powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. Determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought and sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce. And that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, by murdering the people on whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the LIBERTIES of one people with crimes which he urges them to commit against the LIVES of another. Struck out.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms; our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injuries. Not altered.
A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a people who mean to be free. Future ages will scarcely believe that the hardiness of one man adventured, within the short compass of twelve years only, to lay a foundation so broad and so undisguised for tyranny over a people fostered and fixed in principles of freedom. A prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.
Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend a jurisdiction over these our states. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here; no one of which could warrant so strange a pretension; these were effected at the expense of our own blood and treasure, unassisted by the wealth or the strength of Great Britain; that in constituting indeed our several forms of government, we had adopted one common king; thereby laying a foundation for perpetual league and amity with them; but that submission to their parliament was no part of our constitution, nor ever in idea if history may be credited; and we appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, as well as to the ties of our common kindred, to disavow these usurpations which were likely to interrupt our connexion and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity, and when occasions have been given them by the regular course of their laws, of removing from their councils the disturbers of our harmony, they have by their free election re-established them in power. At this very time too, they are permitting their chief magistrate to send over not only soldiers of our common blood, but Scotch and foreign mercenaries to invade and destroy us. These facts have given the last stab to agonizing affection, and manly spirit bids us to renounce for ever these unfeeling brethren. We must endeavour to forget our former love for them, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends. We might have been a free and a great people together; but a communication of grandeur and of freedom, it seems, is below their dignity. Be it so, since they will have it. The road to happiness and to glory is open to us too. We will tread it apart from them, and acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our eternal separation. Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here; we have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations which would inevitably interrupt our connexion and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must therefore acquiesce in the necessity which denounces our separation, and hold them as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.
We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America in general congress assembled, do, in the name and by the authority of the good people of these states, reject and renounce all allegiance and subjection to the kings of Great Britain, and all others who may hereafter claim by, through or under them; we utterly dissolve all political connexion which may heretofore have subsisted between us and the people or parliament of Great Britain; and finally we do assert and declare these colonies to be free and independent states, and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America in general congress assembled, appealing to the supreme judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do in the name, and by the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare that these united colonies are and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British crown, and that all political connexion between them and the state of Great Britain is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do.
And for the support of this declaration, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honour.

 

The words expunged from the original draft are distinguished by italics, as are the words that were introduced by congress.

The words removed from the original draft are shown in italics, as are the words that were added by Congress.


NOTE—No. VII. See Page 229.

"My reasons for this measure," said the Commander-in-chief in his letter to General Lee, ordering him to cross the Hudson, "and which I think must have weight with you, are, that the enemy are evidently changing the seat of war to this side of the North river; that this country, therefore, will expect the continental army to give what support they can; and, if disappointed in this, will cease to depend upon, or support a force by which no protection is given to them. It is, therefore, of the utmost importance that at least an appearance of force should be made, to keep this state in connexion with the others. If that should not continue, it is much to be feared that its influence on Pennsylvania would be very considerable; and the public interests would be more and more endangered. Unless, therefore, some new event should occur, or some more cogent reason present itself, I would have you move over by the easiest and best passage. I am sensible your numbers will not be large, and that the movement may not perhaps be agreeable to your troops. As to the first, report will exaggerate them, and there will be preserved the appearance of an army, which will, at least, have the effect of encouraging the desponding here; and, as to the other, you will doubtless represent to them, that in duty and gratitude, their service is due wherever the enemy may make the greatest impression, or seem to intend to do so."

"My reasons for this decision," said the Commander-in-Chief in his letter to General Lee, instructing him to cross the Hudson, "which I believe should be important to you, are that the enemy is clearly shifting the focus of the war to this side of the North River; therefore, this region will expect the Continental Army to provide whatever support they can. If disappointed in this, they will stop relying on or supporting a force that offers them no protection. It is crucial that we at least create the appearance of strength to keep this state in line with the others. If that doesn't happen, there's a real risk that its influence on Pennsylvania could be significant, and the public interest would be increasingly at risk. Unless something new happens or a stronger reason comes up, I would like you to move over using the easiest and best route. I know your numbers won't be large, and that this movement might not sit well with your troops. As for the first concern, reports will likely exaggerate their numbers, and we will maintain the appearance of an army, which will at least help lift the spirits of those here. Regarding the second concern, you will surely explain to them that their duty and gratitude demand their service wherever the enemy poses the greatest threat or seems to intend to do so."


NOTE—No. VIII. See Page 268.

In a postscript, it is stated, that an accurate return could not be obtained, but that from the best estimate he could form, the whole force in Jersey fit for duty was under three thousand; all of whom, except nine hundred and eighty-one, were militia, who stood engaged only until the last of that month. The continental troops under inoculation, including their attendants, amounted to about one thousand.

In a postscript, it’s mentioned that an exact figure couldn't be provided, but from the best estimate he could make, the total force in Jersey ready for duty was under three thousand; of these, except for nine hundred and eighty-one, all were militia, who were only committed until the end of that month. The continental troops undergoing inoculation, along with their attendants, totaled about one thousand.

In a letter of the sixth of March to Governor Trumbull, calling on the state of Connecticut for two thousand militia to be marched to Peekskill, after complaining of the militia he had called from the southern states, who came and went as their own caprice might direct, he says, "I am persuaded, from the readiness with which you have ever complied with all my demands, that you will exert yourself in forwarding the aforementioned number of men, upon my bare request. But I hope you will be convinced of the necessity of the demand, when I tell you, in confidence, that after the 15th of this month, when the time of General Lincoln's militia expires, I shall be left with the remains of five Virginia regiments, not amounting to more than as many hundred men, and parts of two or three other continental battalions, all very weak. The remainder of the army will be composed of small parties of militia from this state and Pennsylvania, on whom little dependence can be put, as they come and go when they please. I have issued peremptory orders to every colonel in the regular service, to send in what men he has recruited, even if they amount to but one hundred to a regiment: if they would do this, it would make a considerable force upon the whole. The enemy must be ignorant of our numbers and situation, or they would never suffer us to remain unmolested; and I almost tax myself with imprudence in committing the secret to paper; not that I distrust you, of whose inviolable attachment I have had so many proofs; but for fear the letter should by any accident fall into other hands than those for which it is intended."

In a letter dated March 6th to Governor Trumbull, requesting the state of Connecticut to send two thousand militia to Peekskill, after expressing frustration with the militia he had called from the southern states who came and went as they pleased, he writes, "I believe that, based on how readily you've always responded to my requests, you will do your best to send the number of men I've asked for, just on my word. But I hope you see the urgency of this request when I share in confidence that after the 15th of this month, when General Lincoln's militia's time is up, I will only have the remnants of five Virginia regiments, totaling no more than a few hundred men, along with parts of two or three other continental battalions, all of them very weak. The rest of the army will consist of small groups of militia from this state and Pennsylvania, on whom we can rely very little since they come and go as they wish. I've given strict orders to every colonel in the regular service to send in any men they have recruited, even if it's just a hundred per regiment: if they do this, it would create a significant force overall. The enemy must be unaware of our numbers and situation, or they wouldn't let us remain undisturbed; and I feel a bit reckless sending this in writing; not because I don't trust you, whose unwavering loyalty I've seen many times, but because I'm worried this letter might accidentally end up in the wrong hands."


NOTE—No. IX. See Page 382.

Justice to the unfortunate demands that an extract from the correspondence between Generals Burgoyne and Gates on this subject should be inserted.

Justice to the unfortunate requires that an excerpt from the correspondence between Generals Burgoyne and Gates on this topic be included.

The British general had complained of the harsh treatment experienced by the provincial prisoners taken at Bennington, and requested that a surgeon from his army should be permitted to visit the wounded; and that he might be allowed to furnish them with necessaries and attendants. "Duty and principle," he added, "make me a public enemy to the Americans, who have taken up arms; but I seek to be a generous one; nor have I the shadow of resentment against any individual, who does not induce it by acts derogatory to those maxims, upon which all men of honour think alike." In answer to this letter, General Gates, who had just taken command of the American army, said, "that the savages of America should, in their warfare, mangle and scalp the unhappy prisoners who fall into their hands is neither new nor extraordinary, but that the famous Lieutenant General Burgoyne, in whom the fine gentleman is united with the soldier and the scholar, should hire the savages of America to scalp Europeans, and the descendants of Europeans; nay more, that he should pay a price for each scalp so barbarously taken, is more than will be believed in Europe, until authenticated facts shall, in every gazette, confirm the truth of the horrid tale.

The British general had complained about the mistreatment faced by the provincial prisoners captured at Bennington, asking that a surgeon from his army be allowed to visit the wounded and provide them with essentials and support. "Duty and principle," he added, "make me a public enemy to the Americans who have taken up arms; but I want to be a generous one; nor do I hold any resentment against individuals unless they provoke it with actions that go against the principles that all honorable people agree upon." In response to this letter, General Gates, who had just taken command of the American army, said, "It is neither new nor surprising that the Native Americans, in their warfare, should mutilate and scalp the unfortunate prisoners who fall into their hands. However, that the renowned Lieutenant General Burgoyne, who embodies the gentleman, soldier, and scholar, should hire Native Americans to scalp Europeans and their descendants; and that he should pay a bounty for each scalp so brutally taken, is something that will be hard to believe in Europe until verified facts confirm the horrific story in every newspaper."

"Miss M'Crea, a young lady, lovely to the sight, of virtuous character, and amiable disposition, engaged to an officer of your army, was, with other women and children, taken out of a house near fort Edward, carried into the woods, and there scalped and mangled in a most shocking manner. Two parents with their six children, were all treated with the same inhumanity, while quietly resting in their once happy and peaceful dwelling. The miserable fate of Miss M'Crea was particularly aggravated, by being dressed to receive her promised husband; but met her murderer employed by you. Upwards of one hundred men, women and children, have perished by the hands of the ruffians to whom, it is asserted, you have paid the price of blood."

"Miss M'Crea, a beautiful young woman with a virtuous character and a kind personality, was engaged to one of your army's officers. She, along with other women and children, was taken from a house near Fort Edward, dragged into the woods, and brutally scalped and mutilated. Two parents and their six children suffered the same horrific fate while peacefully resting in their once happy home. Miss M'Crea's tragic fate was made worse by the fact that she was dressed to greet her fiancé, only to encounter her murderer, who was employed by you. More than a hundred men, women, and children have been killed by the hands of the criminals to whom you are said to have paid a bounty."

To this part of his letter, General Burgoyne replied, "I have hesitated, sir, upon answering the other paragraphs of your letter. I disdain to justify myself against the rhapsodies of fiction and calumny, which from the first of this contest, it has been an unvaried American policy to propagate, but which no longer imposes on the world. I am induced to deviate from this general rule, in the present instance, lest my silence should be construed an acknowledgment of the truth of your allegations, and a pretence be thence taken for exercising future barbarities by the American troops.

To this part of his letter, General Burgoyne replied, "I have hesitated, sir, to respond to the other sections of your letter. I refuse to defend myself against the fabrications and slander that have been a consistent American tactic since the beginning of this conflict and which no longer fool anyone. I feel compelled to break this general rule in this case so that my silence isn't seen as an admission of the truth of your claims and doesn't give any excuse for the American troops to carry out further atrocities."

"By this motive, and upon this only, I condescend to inform you, that I would not be conscious of the acts you presume to impute to me, for the whole continent of America, though the wealth of worlds was in its bowels, and a paradise upon its surface.

"Because of this reason, and only this, I’ll let you know that I wouldn’t be aware of the actions you think I committed, even if the entire continent of America held the wealth of worlds underground and a paradise on its surface."

"It has happened, that all my transactions with the Indian nations, last year and this, have been clearly heard, distinctly understood, accurately minuted, by very numerous, and in many parts, very unprejudiced persons. So immediately opposite to the truth is your assertion that I have paid a price for scalps, that one of the first regulations established by me at the great council in May, and repeated and enforced, and invariably adhered to since, was, that the Indians should receive compensation for prisoners, because it would prevent cruelty; and that not only such compensation should be withheld, but a strict account demanded for scalps. These pledges of conquest, for such you well know they will ever esteem them, were solemnly and peremptorily prohibited to be taken from the wounded, and even the dying, and the persons of aged men, women, children, and prisoners, were pronounced sacred, even in an assault.

"It has happened that all my dealings with the Indian nations, last year and this, have been clearly heard, distinctly understood, and accurately recorded by many people, who are largely unbiased. Your claim that I have paid a bounty for scalps is completely false. One of the first rules I established at the great council in May, which has been repeated, enforced, and consistently followed since then, was that the Indians should receive compensation for prisoners, as it would help prevent cruelty. Moreover, not only should such compensation be provided, but a strict account of scalps should be demanded. These promises of conquest, which you know they will always view as such, were strictly and absolutely prohibited from being taken from the wounded, and even the dying, and the lives of elderly men, women, children, and prisoners were considered sacred, even during an assault."

"In regard to Miss M'Crea, her fall wanted not the tragic display you have laboured to give it, to make it as sincerely abhorred and lamented by me, as it can be by the tenderest of her friends. The fact was no premeditated barbarity. On the contrary, two chiefs who had brought her off for the purpose of security, not of violence to her person, disputed which should be her guard, and in a fit of savage passion in one, from whose hands she was snatched, the unhappy woman became the victim. Upon the first intelligence of this event, I obliged the Indians to deliver the murderer into my hands, and though to have punished him by our laws, or principles of justice, would have been perhaps unprecedented, he certainly should have suffered an ignominious death, had I not been convinced from my circumstances and observation, beyond the possibility of a doubt, that a pardon under the terms which I presented, and they accepted, would be more efficacious than an execution, to prevent similar mischiefs.

"In regard to Miss M'Crea, her fall didn’t lack the tragic impact you’ve worked to portray, making it as genuinely condemned and mourned by me as it can be by her closest friends. The reality wasn’t a planned act of cruelty. On the contrary, two chiefs who had taken her to ensure her safety, not to harm her, argued over who would protect her, and in a moment of savage anger from one, from whom she was taken, the unfortunate woman became a victim. Upon hearing about this event, I forced the Indians to hand over the murderer to me, and while punishing him according to our laws or principles of justice might have been unconventional, he definitely would have faced a disgraceful death had I not been convinced from my situation and observations, beyond any doubt, that a pardon with the conditions I proposed, which they accepted, would be more effective than an execution in preventing similar tragedies."

"The above instance excepted, your intelligence respecting the cruelty of the Indians is false.

"The only exception to this is that your understanding of the cruelty of the Indians is incorrect."

"You seem to threaten me with European publications, which affect me as little as any other threats you could make; but in regard to American publications, whether your charge against me, which I acquit you of believing, was penned from a gazette, or for a gazette, I desire and demand of you, as a man of honour, that should it appear in print at all this answer may follow it."

"You seem to be threatening me with European publications, which affect me as little as any other threats you could make; but regarding American publications, whether your accusation against me, which I know you don’t truly believe, was written from a newspaper or for a newspaper, I ask and expect you, as a man of honor, that if it appears in print at all, this response should follow it."


NOTE—No. X. See Page 405.

Lord Suffolk, secretary of state, contended for the employment of Indians, in the war. "Besides its policy and necessity," his lordship said, "that the measure was also allowable on principle, for that it was perfectly justifiable to use all the means that God and nature had put into our hands."

Lord Suffolk, the secretary of state, argued for the use of Indians in the war. "Aside from its practicality and necessity," he said, "this approach is also justifiable in principle, as it's completely acceptable to use all the resources that God and nature have given us."

This moving the indignation of Lord Chatham, he suddenly rose, and gave full vent to his feelings in one of the most extraordinary bursts of eloquence that the pen of history has recorded: "I am astonished," exclaimed his lordship, "shocked to hear such principles confessed; to hear them avowed in this house or even this country. My lords, I did not intend to have encroached again on your attention, but I can not repress my indignation. I feel myself impelled to speak. My lords, we are called upon as members of this house, as men, as christians, to protest against such horrible barbarity. That God and nature had put into our hands! what ideas of God and nature that noble lord may entertain I know not, but I know that such detestable principles are equally abhorrent to religion and humanity. What, to attribute the sacred sanction of God and nature to the massacres of the Indian scalping knife! to the cannibal savage, torturing, murdering, devouring, drinking the blood of his mangled victims! such notions shock every precept of morality, every feeling of humanity, every sentiment of honour. These abominable principles and this more abominable avowal of them, demand the most decisive indignation. I call upon that right reverend and this most learned bench to vindicate the religion of their God, to support the justice of their country. I call upon the bishops to interpose the unsullied sanctity of their lawn, upon the judges to interpose the purity of their ermine, to save us from this pollution. I call upon the honour of your lordships, to reverence the dignity of your ancestors, and to maintain your own. I call upon the spirit and humanity of my country, to vindicate the national character. I invoke the genius of the constitution. From the tapestry that adorns these walls, the immortal ancestor of this noble lord, frowns with indignation at the disgrace of his country. In vain did he defend the liberty, and establish the religion of Britain against the tyranny of Rome, if these worse than popish cruelties and inquisitorial practices are endured among us. To send forth the merciless cannibal thirsting for blood!—against whom?—Your protestant brethren—to lay waste their country, to desolate their dwellings, and extirpate their race and name, by the aid and instrumentality of these horrible hell-hounds of war! Spain can no longer boast preeminence of barbarity. She armed herself with blood-hounds to extirpate the wretched natives of Mexico, but we more ruthless, loose these dogs of war against our countrymen in America, endeared to us by every tie that should sanctify humanity. My lords, I solemnly call upon your lordships, and upon every order of men in the state, to stamp upon this infamous procedure the indelible stigma of the public abhorrence. More particularly I call upon the holy prelates of our religion to do away this iniquity; let them perform a lustration to purify their country from this deep and deadly sin. My lords, I am old and weak, and at present unable to say more, but my feelings and indignation were too strong to have said less. I could not have slept this night in my bed, nor reposed my head upon my pillow, without giving this vent to my eternal abhorrence of such enormous and preposterous principles."

This deeply moved Lord Chatham, prompting him to rise suddenly and express his feelings in one of the most extraordinary displays of eloquence recorded in history: "I am shocked," he exclaimed, "to hear such principles openly stated; to hear them declared in this house or even in this country. My lords, I did not mean to take up your time again, but I can’t hold back my anger. I feel compelled to speak. My lords, we are called as members of this house, as men, as Christians, to protest against such terrible barbarity. That God and nature had put power in our hands! I don’t know what ideas that noble lord has about God and nature, but I know that such detestable principles are equally repugnant to religion and humanity. What, to attribute the sacred approval of God and nature to the acts of the Indian scalping knife! To the cannibal savage, torturing, murdering, devouring, drinking the blood of his mutilated victims! Such ideas violate every moral principle, every sense of humanity, every feeling of honor. These abominable principles and their even more abominable admission of them deserve the strongest condemnation. I call upon that right reverend and this highly educated group to defend the religion of their God and uphold the justice of their country. I call upon the bishops to protect the pure sanctity of their robes, upon the judges to defend the integrity of their office, to save us from this corruption. I call upon the honor of your lordships to respect the dignity of your ancestors and to maintain your own. I call upon the spirit and humanity of my country to uphold our national character. I invoke the very spirit of the constitution. From the tapestries that decorate these walls, the immortal ancestor of this noble lord looks down with indignation at the shame of his country. In vain did he defend the liberty and establish the religion of Britain against the oppression of Rome if these worse than papal cruelties and inquisitorial practices are tolerated among us. To send out the merciless cannibal thirsting for blood!—against whom?—Your Protestant brothers—to destroy their land, to ravage their homes, and to eradicate their race and name, aided by these horrible hellhounds of war! Spain can no longer claim superiority in barbarity. She armed herself with bloodhounds to wipe out the miserable natives of Mexico, but we, even more ruthless, unleash these dogs of war against our fellow countrymen in America, bound to us by every connection that should sanctify humanity. My lords, I solemnly urge your lordships and every class of people in the state to mark this infamous act with the permanent stain of public outrage. More specifically, I urge the holy leaders of our faith to abolish this evil; let them perform a cleansing to rid our country of this deep and deadly sin. My lords, I am old and weak, and right now I can't say more, but my feelings and anger were too strong not to say at least this much. I couldn’t have slept tonight in my bed or rested my head on my pillow without expressing my eternal disgust for such enormous and absurd principles."


NOTE—No. XI. See Page 414.

The following are the letters which passed between the two generals on this subject:

The following are the letters exchanged between the two generals on this topic:

Albany, December 18, 1777.

Albany, December 18, 1777.

Sir,—I shall not attempt to describe what, as a private gentleman, I can not help feeling, on representing to my mind the disagreeable situation which confidential letters, when exposed to public inspection, may place an unsuspecting correspondent in; but, as a public officer, I conjure your excellency, to give me all the assistance you can, in tracing out the author of the infidelity, which put extracts from General Conway's letters to me into your hands. Those letters have been stealingly copied; but, which of them, when, or by whom, is to me, as yet, an unfathomable secret.

Mr.,—I won’t try to explain how I feel as a private individual about the unpleasant situation that confidential letters can create when made public; however, as a public official, I urge you to help me in finding the person responsible for the betrayal that has led to parts of General Conway's letters being handed over to you. Those letters have been secretly copied, but I have not been able to figure out which ones, when it happened, or who did it—it’s still a complete mystery to me.

There is not one officer in my suite, or amongst those who have a free access to me, upon whom I could, with the least justification to myself, fix the suspicion; and yet, my uneasiness may deprive me of the usefulness of the worthiest men. It is, I believe, in your excellency's power to do me, and the United States, a very important service, by detecting a wretch who may betray me, and capitally injure the very operations under your immediate direction. For this reason, sir, I beg your excellency will favour me with the proofs you can procure to that effect. But, the crime being, eventually so important, that the least loss of time may be attended with the worst consequences; and, it being unknown to me whether the letter came to you from a member of congress, or from an officer, I shall have the honour of transmitting a copy of this to the president, that congress may, in concert with your excellency, obtain, as soon as possible, a discovery which so deeply affects the safety of the states. Crimes of that magnitude ought not to remain unpunished.

There isn't a single officer in my team, or among those who can freely approach me, that I could justifiably suspect; yet, my anxiety might lead me to distrust even the most honorable individuals. I believe it's within your power to provide a crucial service to me and the United States by identifying a rogue who might betray me and severely undermine the operations under your direct supervision. For this reason, I respectfully request that you share any evidence you can gather on this matter. However, since the crime is significantly serious, and any delay could lead to terrible outcomes, and since I don't know whether the letter came from a member of Congress or from an officer, I will forward a copy of this to the president so Congress can work with you to uncover the truth as soon as possible, as it profoundly impacts the safety of the states. Such serious crimes should not go unpunished.

I have the honour to be,

I’m honored to be here,

Sir, With the greatest respect,

Sir, with utmost respect,

Your excellency's most humble and most obedient servant,

Your Excellency's most humble and obedient servant,

HORATIO GATES.

HORATIO GATES.

His excellency General Washington.

General Washington.


Valley Forge, January 4, 1778.

Valley Forge, Jan 4, 1778.

Sir,—Your letter of the 18th ultimo, came to my hands a few days ago, and to my great surprise informed me, that a copy of it had been sent to congress, for what reason, I find myself unable to account; but, as some end doubtless was intended to be answered by it, I am laid under the disagreeable necessity of returning my answer through the same channel, lest any member of that honourable body should harbour an unfavourable suspicion of my having practised some indiscreet means to come at the contents of the confidential letters between you and General Conway.

Dude,—I received your letter from the 18th of last month a few days ago, and to my surprise, it informed me that a copy had been sent to Congress. I can't understand why, but since it seems there was some purpose behind it, I feel I must respond through the same means to avoid any member of that honorable body thinking I used any inappropriate methods to learn the details of your private correspondence with General Conway.

I am to inform you then, that ——, on his way to congress in the month of October last, fell in with Lord Stirling at Reading: and, not in confidence that I ever understood, informed his aid-de-camp, Major M'Williams, that General Conway had written thus to you, "heaven has been determined to save your country, or a weak general and bad counsellors[106] would have ruined it." Lord Stirling, from motives of friendship, transmitted the account with this remark. "The enclosed was communicated by ——to Major M'Williams; such wicked duplicity of conduct I shall always think it my duty to detect."

I need to tell you that ——, while on his way to Congress last October, ran into Lord Stirling in Reading. Not having any confidence that I ever understood, he told his aide-de-camp, Major M'Williams, that General Conway wrote to you, "heaven has been set on saving your country, or a weak general and bad advisors[106] would have destroyed it." Lord Stirling, out of friendship, shared this account with the comment, "The enclosed was communicated by —— to Major M'Williams; I will always feel it’s my duty to expose such wicked duplicity."

In consequence of this information, and without having any thing more in view, than merely to show that gentleman that I was not unapprised of his intriguing disposition, I wrote him a letter in these words.

As a result of this information, and without any other intention than to show that man that I was aware of his scheming nature, I wrote him a letter saying the following.

"Sir, a letter which I received last night contained the following paragraph.

"Sir, a letter I received last night included the following paragraph."

"In a letter from General Conway to General Gates, he says, heaven has been determined to save your country, or a weak general and bad counsellors would have ruined it. I am, sir, &c."

"In a letter from General Conway to General Gates, he states that heaven has decided to save your country, or else a weak general and poor advisors would have destroyed it. I am, sir, &c."

Neither the letter, nor the information which occasioned it, was ever, directly, or indirectly, communicated by me to a single officer in this army (out of my own family) excepting the Marquis de Lafayette, who having been spoken to on the subject, by General Conway, applied for, and saw, under injunctions of secrecy, the letter which contained this information; so desirous was I of concealing every matter that could, in its consequences, give the smallest interruption to the tranquillity of this army, or afford a gleam of hope to the enemy by dissensions therein.

Neither the letter nor the information that prompted it was ever communicated by me, either directly or indirectly, to any officer in this army (aside from my own family), except for the Marquis de Lafayette. He was approached about the matter by General Conway, who then requested and reviewed the letter containing this information under strict confidentiality. I was determined to keep everything concealed that could possibly disrupt the peace of this army or give the enemy a hint of division among us.

Thus, sir, with an openness and candour, which I hope will ever characterize and mark my conduct, have I complied with your request. The only concern I feel upon the occasion, finding how matters stand, is, that in doing this, I have necessarily been obliged to name a gentleman, who, I am persuaded, (although I never exchanged a word with him upon the subject) thought he was rather doing an act of justice, than committing an act of infidelity; and sure I am, that, until Lord Stirling's letter came to my hands, I never knew that General Conway, (whom I viewed in the light of a stranger to you) was a correspondent of yours, much less did I suspect that I was the subject of your confidential letters. Pardon me then for adding, that, so far from conceiving that the safety of the states can be affected, or in the smallest degree injured, by a discovery of this kind, or that I should be called upon in such solemn terms to point out the author, that I considered the information as coming from yourself, and given with a friendly view to forewarn, and consequently forearm me, against a secret enemy, or in other words, a dangerous incendiary, in which character sooner or later, this country will know General Conway. But, in this, as well as other matters of late, I have found myself mistaken. I am, sir,

So, sir, with an honesty and openness that I hope will always define my actions, I have fulfilled your request. The only concern I have in this situation, upon realizing how things are, is that in doing so, I had to mention a gentleman who, I'm convinced (even though I've never spoken to him about this), thought he was doing the right thing rather than being disloyal. Until I received Lord Stirling's letter, I had no idea that General Conway, whom I considered a stranger to you, was in correspondence with you, let alone that I was the subject of your private letters. Please forgive me for adding that, far from believing that the safety of the states could be impacted or even slightly harmed by this revelation, or that I should be asked in such serious terms to identify the source, I viewed the information as coming from you, intended with a friendly purpose to warn me about a hidden enemy or, in other words, a dangerous instigator. Sooner or later, this country will recognize General Conway in that role. But, in this and other recent matters, I have found myself mistaken. I am, sir,

Your most obedient servant,

Sincerely yours,

GEO: WASHINGTON.

WA: WASHINGTON.

To Major General Gates.

To Major General Gates.


NOTE—No. XII. See Page 417.

During the existence of this faction, an attempt appears to have been made to alienate the affections of the leading political personages in the states from the commander-in-chief. The following letters exhibit a very unsuccessful effort of this sort, which was made on Governor Henry, of Virginia, by a gentleman not supposed to be a member of congress from that state.

During the time this group was active, it seems there was an attempt to turn the leading political figures in the states against the commander-in-chief. The following letters show a rather unsuccessful attempt at this, which was made on Governor Henry of Virginia, by a man who isn’t thought to be a member of Congress from that state.

Williamsburgh, February 20, 1778.

Williamsburg, February 20, 1778.

Dear Sir,—You will no doubt be surprised at seeing the enclosed letter, in which the encomiums bestowed on me are as undeserved, as the censures aimed at you are unjust. I am sorry there should be one man who counts himself my friend, who is not yours.

Dear Sir/Madam,—You will probably be surprised to see the enclosed letter, where the praises given to me are as unearned as the criticisms directed at you are unfair. I'm sorry that there’s someone who considers himself my friend but is not yours.

Perhaps I give you needless trouble in handing you this paper. The writer of it may be too insignificant to deserve any notice. If I knew this to be the case, I should not have intruded on your time, which is so precious. But there may possibly be some scheme or party forming to your prejudice. The enclosed leads to such a suspicion. Believe me, sir, I have too high a sense of the obligations America has to you, to abet or countenance so unworthy a proceeding. The most exalted merit hath ever been found to attract envy. But I please myself with the hope, that the same fortitude and greatness of mind which have hitherto braved all the difficulties and dangers inseparable from your station, will rise superior to every attempt of the envious partisan.

Maybe I'm bothering you by sending you this paper. The person who wrote it might be too unimportant to warrant any attention. If I knew that was true, I wouldn't take up your valuable time. However, there might be some scheme or group forming against you. What’s included leads to that suspicion. Believe me, sir, I have too much respect for what America owes you to support or condone such a disgraceful act. The highest achievements have always attracted envy. But I hold onto the hope that the same courage and strength of character that have helped you face all the challenges and dangers of your position will overcome any attempts by envious rivals.

I really can not tell who is the writer of this letter, which not a little perplexes me. The hand writing is altogether strange to me.

I really can't tell who wrote this letter, which confuses me a lot. The handwriting is completely unfamiliar to me.

To give you the trouble of this, gives me pain. It would suit my inclination better, to give you some assistance in the great business of the war. But I will not conceal any thing from you, by which you may be affected, for I really think your personal welfare and the happiness of America are intimately connected. I beg you will be assured of that high regard and esteem with which I ever am,

To put you through this trouble causes me pain. I would prefer to help you with the major task of the war. However, I won’t hide anything from you that could affect you because I truly believe your personal well-being and the happiness of America are closely linked. I hope you know that I have a deep respect and admiration for you.

Dear sir,

Dear Sir,

Your affectionate friend and very humble servant,

Your loving friend and very humble servant,

P. HENRY.

P. Henry.

His excellency General Washington.

General Washington.

 

(Letter enclosed in the preceding.)

(Letter included in the above.)

Yorktown, January 12, 1778.

Yorktown, January 12, 1778.

Dear Sir,—The common danger of our country first brought you and me together. I recollect with pleasure the influence of your conversation and eloquence upon the opinions of this country in the beginning of the present controversy. You first taught us to shake off our idolatrous attachment to royalty, and to oppose its encroachments upon our liberties with our very lives. By these means you saved us from ruin. The independence of America is the offspring of that liberal spirit of thinking, and acting, which followed the destruction of the sceptres of kings and the mighty power of Great Britain.

Dear Sir/Madam,—The shared threat to our country was what brought you and me together. I fondly remember how your conversation and passion shaped the views of our nation at the start of this conflict. You were the one who encouraged us to let go of our blind loyalty to the monarchy and to fight against its attempts to infringe on our freedoms with everything we had. Because of this, you spared us from disaster. America’s independence is the result of that open-minded way of thinking and acting that emerged after the downfall of kings and the powerful grip of Great Britain.

But, sir, we have only passed the Red Sea. A dreary wilderness is still before us, and unless a Moses or a Joshua are raised up in our behalf, we must perish before we reach the promised land. We have nothing to fear from our enemies on the way. General Howe, it is true, has taken Philadelphia; but he has only changed his prison. His dominions are bounded on all sides by his outsentries. America can only be undone by herself. She looks up to her councils and arms for protection; but alas! what are they? her representation in congress dwindled to only twenty-one members—her Adams—her Wilson—her Henry, are no more among them. Her councils weak—and partial remedies applied constantly for universal diseases. Her army—what is it? a major general belonging to it called it a few days ago in my hearing a mob. Discipline unknown or wholly neglected. The quartermaster and commissary's departments filled with idleness, ignorance and peculation—our hospitals crowded with six thousand sick, but half provided with necessaries or accommodations, and more dying in them in one month, than perished in the field during the whole of the last campaign.

But, sir, we've only crossed the Red Sea. A bleak wilderness lies ahead of us, and unless we get a Moses or a Joshua to help us, we’re going to perish before we reach the promised land. We have nothing to fear from our enemies on the journey. It's true that General Howe has taken Philadelphia, but he’s just moved his prison. His territory is confined by his sentries. America can only destroy herself. She looks to her councils and arms for protection, but sadly, what do they amount to? Her representation in Congress has shrunk to just twenty-one members—her Adams, her Wilson, her Henry, are no longer among them. Her councils are weak, and they keep applying partial remedies for widespread issues. Her army—what is it? A major general referred to it as a mob just a few days ago in my hearing. Discipline is either unknown or completely neglected. The quartermaster and commissary's departments are filled with laziness, ignorance, and corruption—our hospitals are overcrowded with six thousand sick, but only half equipped with essentials or accommodations, and more are dying in them in one month than were lost in the field during the entire last campaign.

The money depreciating without any effectual measures being taken to raise it—the country distracted with the Don Quixote attempts to regulate the prices of provisions, an artificial famine created by it, and a real one dreaded from it. The spirit of the people failing through a more intimate acquaintance with the causes of our misfortunes—many submitting daily to General Howe, and more wishing to do it, only to avoid the calamities which threaten our country. But is our case desperate? by no means. We have wisdom, virtue, and strength eno' to save us if they could be called into action. The northern army has shown us what Americans are capable of doing with A GENERAL at their head. The spirit of the southern army is no ways inferior to the spirit of the northern. A Gates—a Lee, or a Conway would, in a few weeks, render them an irresistible body of men. The last of the above officers has accepted of the new office of inspector general of our army, in order to reform abuses—but the remedy is only a palliative one. In one of his letters to a friend he says, "a great and good God hath decreed America to be free—or the —— and weak counsellors would have ruined her long ago"—you may rest assured of each of the facts related in this letter. The author of it is one of your Philadelphia friends. A hint of his name, if found out by the hand writing, must not be mentioned to your most intimate friend. Even the letter must be thrown in the fire. But some of its contents ought to be made public in order to awaken, enlighten, and alarm our country. I rely upon your prudence, and am, dear sir, with my usual attachment to you, and to our beloved independence,

The money is losing value without any effective measures being taken to improve it—the country is troubled by the misguided attempts to regulate food prices, creating an artificial famine, with a real one feared as a result. The people's spirit is dwindling as they become more aware of the reasons for our troubles—many are giving in to General Howe, and more wish to do so just to escape the disasters threatening our country. But is our situation hopeless? Not at all. We have enough wisdom, virtue, and strength eno' to save us if we could put them into action. The northern army has shown us what Americans can do with A GENERAL leading them. The spirit of the southern army is just as strong as that of the northern one. A Gates—a Lee, or a Conway would, in a few weeks, turn them into an unstoppable force. The last of those officers has taken on the new role of inspector general of our army to fix abuses—but the solution is only a temporary fix. In one of his letters to a friend, he writes, "a great and good God has decreed America to be free—or the —— and weak advisers would have ruined her long ago"—you can trust each of the facts mentioned in this letter. The author is one of your friends from Philadelphia. If his name is discovered by the handwriting, it must not be mentioned even to your closest friend. Even the letter must be burned. However, some of its contents should be made public to awaken, inform, and alert our country. I trust your judgment, and I am, dear sir, with my usual affection for you and for our beloved independence,

Yours, sincerely.

Best regards.

His excellency P. Henry.

His Excellency P. Henry.


Williamsburgh, March 5, 1778.

Williamsburg, March 5, 1778.

Dear Sir,—By an express which Colonel Finnie sent to camp, I enclosed you an anonymous letter, which I hope got safe to hand. I am anxious to hear something that will serve to explain the strange affair, which I am now informed is taken up, respecting you. Mr. Custis has just paid us a visit, and by him I learn sundry particulars concerning General Mifflin, that much surprise me. It is very hard to trace the schemes and windings of the enemies to America. I really thought that man its friend: however, I am too far from him to judge of his present temper.

Dear Sir,,—Colonel Finnie sent an express to camp, and I included an anonymous letter for you, which I hope arrived safely. I’m eager to hear something that might explain the unusual situation that I’ve now heard is concerning you. Mr. Custis just visited us, and through him, I learned several details about General Mifflin that surprised me. It’s quite challenging to follow the plans and schemes of those who oppose America. I really thought that man was an ally; however, I’m too far from him to accurately gauge his current mood.

While you face the armed enemies of our liberty in the field, and, by the favour of God, have been kept unhurt, I trust your country will never harbour in her bosom the miscreant who would ruin her best supporter. I wish not to flatter; but when arts unworthy honest men are used to defame and traduce you, I think it not amiss, but a duty, to assure you of that estimation in which the public hold you. Not that I think any testimony I can bear, is necessary for your support, or private satisfaction, for a bare recollection of what is past must give you sufficient pleasure in every circumstance of life. But I can not help assuring you, on this occasion, of the high sense of gratitude which all ranks of men, in this your native country, bear to you. It will give me sincere pleasure to manifest my regards, and render my best services to you or yours. I do not like to make a parade of these things, and I know you are not fond of it; however, I hope the occasion will plead my excuse.

While you confront the armed enemies of our freedom in the field, and, thanks to God, have remained unharmed, I trust that your country will never shelter the scoundrel who would betray her greatest supporter. I don’t want to flatter you; however, when dishonest tactics are used to slander and defame you, I believe it’s not only appropriate but my duty to assure you of the high regard in which the public holds you. Not that I think my testimony is needed for your support or personal peace of mind, as just recalling what has come before should bring you enough satisfaction in every aspect of life. But I feel compelled to express, on this occasion, the deep gratitude that all kinds of people in your home country have for you. It will genuinely please me to show my appreciation and offer my best services to you or your family. I’m not one to make a big deal out of these things, and I know you’re not keen on it either; however, I hope the circumstances will justify my actions.

The assembly have at length empowered the executive here to provide the Virginia troops serving with you, with clothes, &c. I am making provision accordingly, and hope to do something towards it. Every possible assistance from government is afforded the commissary of provisions, whose department has not been attended to. It was taken up by me too late to do much. Indeed the load of business devolved on me is too great to be managed well. A French ship, mounting thirty guns, that has been long chased by the English cruisers, has got into Carolina, as I hear last night.

The assembly has finally authorized the executive here to provide the Virginia troops serving with you, with clothing, etc. I'm making arrangements for this and hope to contribute something. The government is providing every possible support to the commissary of provisions, whose department hasn’t been properly managed. I got involved too late to make much of a difference. In fact, the amount of work that's been placed on me is too much to handle effectively. A French ship with thirty guns, which has been pursued by the English cruisers for a long time, has arrived in Carolina, or so I heard last night.

Wishing you all possible felicity, I am, my dear sir,

Wishing you all the happiness in the world, I am, my dear sir,

Your ever affectionate friend,

Your always loving friend,

and very humble servant,

and your humble servant,

P. HENRY.

P. Henry.

His excellency General Washington.

General Washington.


Valley Forge, March 27, 1778.

Valley Forge, March 27, 1778.

Dear Sir,—About eight days past, I was honoured with your favour of the 20th ultimo.

Dear Sir/Madam,—About eight days ago, I was pleased to receive your letter dated the 20th of last month.

Your friendship, sir, in transmitting me the anonymous letter you had received, lays me under the most grateful obligations; and, if any thing could give a still further claim to my acknowledgments, it is the very polite and delicate terms in which you have been pleased to make the communication.

Your friendship, sir, in sending me the anonymous letter you received, puts me in your debt; and if there’s anything that adds to my gratitude, it’s the very polite and thoughtful way you chose to share the information.

I have ever been happy in supposing that I held a place in your esteem, and the proof of it you have afforded on this occasion makes me peculiarly so. The favourable light in which you hold me is truly flattering, but I should feel much regret if I thought the happiness of America so intimately connected with my personal welfare, as you so obligingly seem to consider it. All I can say, is, that she has ever had, and, I trust, she ever will have, my honest exertions to promote her interest. I can not hope that my services have been the best; but my heart tells me that they have been the best that I could render.

I have always been happy thinking that I have a place in your regard, and the evidence you've provided on this occasion makes me especially happy. The way you view me is genuinely flattering, but I would feel a lot of regret if I believed that America's happiness was so closely tied to my personal welfare, as you kindly seem to think. All I can say is that she has always had, and I hope she will always have, my sincere efforts to support her interests. I can't hope that my contributions have been the best, but my heart tells me that they have been the best I could offer.

That I may have erred in using the means in my power for accomplishing the objects of the arduous, exalted station with which I am honoured, I can not doubt; nor do I wish my conduct to be exempted from the reprehension it may deserve. Error is the portion of humanity, and to censure it, whether committed by this or that public character, is the prerogative of freemen....

That I might have made mistakes in using the resources available to me to achieve the goals of the challenging and esteemed position I'm in, I have no doubt; nor do I want my actions to be free from any criticism they might deserve. Making mistakes is part of being human, and judging it, whether it's done by this or that public figure, is the right of free people...

This is not the only secret insidious attempt that has been made to wound my reputation. There have been others equally base, cruel, and ungenerous; because conducted with as little frankness and proceeding from views perhaps as personally interested.

This isn't the only sneaky effort that's been made to damage my reputation. There have been other equally low, cruel, and selfish attempts, just as dishonest and possibly motivated by selfish interests.

I am, dear sir, &c.

I am, dear sir, etc.

GEO: WASHINGTON.

GEO: WASHINGTON D.C.

To his excellency Patrick Henry, esquire, Governor of Virginia.

To his excellency Patrick Henry, esquire, Governor of Virginia.


Camp, March 28, 1778.

Camp, March 28, 1778.

Dear Sir,—Just as I was about to close my letter of yesterday, your favour of the fifth instant came to hand.

Dear Sir,,—Just as I was about to finish my letter from yesterday, I received your message from the fifth.

I can only thank you again, in the language of the most undissembled gratitude, for your friendship: and assure you, the indulgent disposition which Virginia in particular, and the states in general entertain towards me, gives me the most sensible pleasure. The approbation of my country is what I wish; and, as far as my abilities and opportunity will permit, I hope I shall endeavour to deserve it. It is the highest reward to a feeling mind; and happy are they who so conduct themselves as to merit it.

I can only thank you again, with my deepest gratitude, for your friendship. I want to assure you that the kind attitude shown towards me by Virginia, in particular, and the states in general, brings me great joy. The approval of my country is what I desire, and I will do my best to earn it, as much as my abilities and opportunities allow. It is the greatest reward for someone who cares, and those who act in a way that deserves it are truly fortunate.

The anonymous letter with which you were pleased to favour me, was written by ——, so far as I can judge from a similitude of hands....

The anonymous letter you kindly sent me was written by ——, as far as I can tell from the similarity in handwriting....

My caution to avoid any thing that could injure the service, prevented me from communicating, except to a very few of my friends, the intrigues of a faction which I know was formed against me, since it might serve to publish our internal dissensions; but their own restless zeal to advance their views has too clearly betrayed them, and made concealment on my part fruitless. I can not precisely mark the extent of their views, but it appeared in general, that General Gates was to be exalted on the ruin of my reputation and influence. This I am authorized to say from undeniable facts in my own possession, from publications the evident scope of which could not be mistaken, and from private detractions industriously circulated. ——, it is commonly supposed, bore the second part in the cabal; and General Conway, I know, was a very active and malignant partisan; but I have good reason to believe that their machinations have recoiled most sensibly upon themselves. I am, dear sir, &c.

My caution to avoid anything that could harm the service kept me from sharing the details of a faction that I know was formed against me, except with a few close friends. I thought it might help to keep our internal conflicts private, but their own constant eagerness to promote their agenda has made it obvious who they are, making my efforts to keep it secret pointless. I can't pinpoint exactly what they want, but it seems that General Gates is supposed to rise at the expense of my reputation and influence. I can say this with confidence based on undeniable facts I have in my possession, from publications that clearly show their intentions, and from private slanders that were actively spread. It is widely believed that —— played a significant role in this scheme; and General Conway, I know, was a very active and malicious supporter of it. However, I have strong reasons to believe that their plans have backfired on them quite noticeably. I am, dear sir, &c.

GEO: WASHINGTON.

GEO: WASHINGTON D.C.

His excellency Patrick Henry, esquire, Gov. of Virginia.

His Excellency Patrick Henry, Esquire, Governor of Virginia.

 

The following extract is taken from a letter written about the same time to a gentleman in New England, who had expressed some anxious apprehensions occasioned by a report that the commander-in-chief had determined to resign his station in the army:

The following excerpt is from a letter written around the same time to a man in New England, who had expressed some worry after hearing that the commander-in-chief planned to resign from his position in the army:

"I can assure you that no person ever heard me drop an expression that had a tendency to resignation. The same principles that led me to embark in the opposition to the arbitrary claims of Great Britain, operate with additional force at this day; nor is it my desire to withdraw my services while they are considered of importance in the present contest; but to report a design of this kind, is among the arts, which those who are endeavouring to effect a change are practising to bring it to pass. I have said, and I still do say, that there is not an officer in the service of the United States, that would return to the sweets of domestic life with more heartfelt joy than I should. But I would have this declaration accompanied by these sentiments, that while the public are satisfied with my endeavours, I mean not to shrink from the cause: but the moment her voice, not that of faction, calls upon me to resign, I shall do it with as much pleasure as ever the wearied traveller retired to rest."

"I can assure you that no one has ever heard me say anything that suggested giving up. The same principles that drove me to oppose the unreasonable demands of Great Britain are even stronger today; I have no intention of stepping back while my contributions are seen as valuable in this current struggle. However, reporting such intentions is one of the tactics that those seeking change are using. I have said before, and I still believe, that there isn’t an officer in the service of the United States who would return to a peaceful home life with more genuine happiness than I would. But I want this statement to be accompanied by the thought that as long as the public is happy with my efforts, I won’t shy away from the cause. The moment the public, not just a faction, calls for me to resign, I will do so with as much ease as a weary traveler seeks rest."


NOTE—No. XIII. See Page 456.

The following is an extract of a letter addressed on this occasion by General Washington to congress:

The following is an excerpt from a letter that General Washington wrote to Congress on this occasion:

"Though I sincerely commiserate the misfortune of General Lee, and feel much for his present unhappy situation; yet, with all possible deference to the opinion of congress, I fear that their resolutions will not have the desired effect, are founded in impolicy, and will, if adhered to, produce consequences of an extensive and melancholy nature.

"While I genuinely sympathize with General Lee's misfortune and feel for his current unhappy situation, I must respectfully express my concern that Congress's resolutions may not achieve the intended results. I believe they are based on poor judgment and, if followed through, will lead to extensive and unfortunate consequences."

"Retaliation is certainly just, and sometimes necessary, even where attended with the severest penalties: but when the evils which may, and must result from it, exceed those intended to be redressed, prudence and policy require that it should be avoided.

"Retaliation can definitely be fair and, at times, necessary, even if it comes with harsh consequences. However, when the negative outcomes that can and will come from it outweigh the issues it's meant to address, it's wise and strategic to steer clear of it."

"Having premised thus much, I beg leave to examine the justice and expediency of it in the instance before us. From the best information I have been able to obtain, General Lee's usage has not been so disgraceful and dishonourable, as to authorize the treatment decreed to these gentlemen, was it not prohibited by many other important considerations. His confinement, I believe, has been more rigorous than has been generally experienced by the rest of our officers, or those of the enemy who have been in our possession; but if the reports received on that head be true, he has been provided with a decent apartment, and with most things necessary to render him comfortable. This is not the case with one of the officers comprehended in the resolves, if his letter, of which a copy is transmitted, deserves your credit. Here retaliation seems to have been prematurely begun, or to speak with more propriety, severities have been, and are exercised towards Colonel Campbell, not justified by any that General Lee has yet received.

"Having laid this groundwork, I would like to discuss the fairness and practicality of the situation we're looking at. According to the best information I've gathered, General Lee's treatment has not been so disgraceful or dishonorable as to justify the treatment these gentlemen are receiving, unless there are many other significant considerations against it. I believe his confinement has been stricter than what most of our officers, or those from the enemy held by us, have experienced; however, if the reports I've received are accurate, he has been given a decent room and most of what he needs to be comfortable. This is not true for one of the officers mentioned in the resolutions, if the letter provided—a copy of which is included—can be trusted. It seems that retaliation has started too soon, or more accurately, harsh measures have been taken against Colonel Campbell that aren't justified by anything General Lee has faced so far."

"In point of policy, and under the present situation of our affairs, most surely the doctrine can not be supported. The balance of prisoners is greatly against us, and a general regard to the happiness of the whole should mark our conduct. Can we imagine that our enemies will not mete the same punishments, the same indignities, the same cruelties, to those belonging to us in their possession, that we impose on theirs? why should we suppose them to have more humanity than we possess ourselves? or why should an ineffectual attempt to relieve the distresses of one brave man, involve many more in misery? At this time, however disagreeable the fact may be, the enemy have in their power, and subject to their call, near three hundred officers belonging to the army of the United States. In this number there are some of high rank, and the most of them are men of bravery and of merit. The quota of theirs in our hands bears no proportion, not being more than fifty. Under these circumstances, we certainly should do no act to draw upon the gentlemen belonging to us, and who have already suffered a long captivity, greater punishments than they now experience. If we should, what will be their feelings, and those of their numerous and extensive connexions? Suppose the treatment prescribed for the Hessian officers should be pursued, will it not establish what the enemy have been aiming to effect by every artifice, and the grossest misrepresentations? I mean, an opinion of our enmity towards them, and of the cruel conduct they experience when they fall into our hands; a prejudice which we, on our part, have heretofore thought it politic to suppress, and to root out by every act of kindness and of lenity. It certainly will. The Hessians will hear of the punishments with all the circumstances of heightened exaggeration, and would feel the injury without investigating the cause, or reasoning upon the justice of it. The mischiefs which may, and must inevitably flow from the execution of the resolves, appear to be endless and innumerable."

"In terms of policy, and given the current state of our affairs, we definitely cannot support this doctrine. The number of prisoners is heavily against us, and we should act with the overall happiness of everyone in mind. Can we really think that our enemies won't impose the same punishments, indignities, and cruelties on our people in their custody as we do on theirs? Why should we believe they have more compassion than we do? And why should a failed attempt to save one brave man cause many others to suffer? Right now, as unpleasant as it is, the enemy has nearly three hundred officers from the United States Army in their control. Among them are some high-ranking individuals, most of whom are brave and deserving. The number we have in our custody is significantly smaller, at only about fifty. Given these circumstances, we should definitely avoid any actions that would inflict greater punishments on our men who have already endured long captivity. If we do, what will their feelings be, and what about their many connections? If we follow through on the treatment prescribed for the Hessian officers, won't it achieve what the enemy has been trying to do through every trick and gross misrepresentation? I'm talking about creating a perception of our hostility toward them and of the cruel treatment they face when captured by us; a bias we have previously thought wise to suppress and counteract with acts of kindness and leniency. It certainly will. The Hessians will hear about the punishments, embellished in every way, and they will feel harmed without considering the reasons or the fairness of it. The consequences of carrying out these resolutions will likely be endless and countless."

END OF VOLUME II.


FOOTNOTES

[1] See note No. I. at the end of the volume.

[1] See note No. I. at the end of the volume.

[2] With an unaffected modesty which the accumulated honours of his after life could never impair, Major Washington, though the most distinguished military man then in Virginia, declined being a candidate for the command of this regiment. The following letter written on the occasion to Colonel Richard Corbin, a member of the council, with whom his family was connected by the ties of friendship and of affinity, was placed in the hands of the author by Mr. Francis Corbin, a son of that gentleman.

[2] With an unaffected modesty that the many honors he would receive later in life could never diminish, Major Washington, the most prominent military figure in Virginia at the time, chose not to run for the command of this regiment. The following letter, written to Colonel Richard Corbin, a council member and family friend, was given to the author by Mr. Francis Corbin, the son of Colonel Corbin.

"Dear Sir,—In a conversation at Green Spring you gave me some room to hope for a commission above that of a Major, and to be ranked among the chief officers of this expedition. The command of the whole forces is what I neither look for, expect, or desire; for I must be impartial enough to confess, it is a charge too great for my youth and inexperience to be intrusted with. Knowing this, I have too sincere a love for my country, to undertake that which may tend to the prejudice of it. But if I could entertain hopes that you thought me worthy of the post of Lieutenant-colonel, and would favour me so far as to mention it at the appointment of officers, I could not but entertain a true sense of the kindness.

"Dear Sir,,—During our conversation at Green Spring, you gave me some reason to hope for a position higher than Major and to be considered among the senior officers of this expedition. I do not seek, expect, or desire to command all the forces, as I must honestly admit it’s a responsibility too significant for my youth and inexperience. Knowing this, my love for my country is too genuine to take on something that could harm it. However, if I could believe that you think I’m worthy of the position of Lieutenant Colonel and would consider mentioning me during the officer appointments, I would truly appreciate your kindness."

"I flatter myself that under a skilful commander, or man of sense, (which I most sincerely wish to serve under,) with my own application and diligent study of my duty, I shall be able to conduct my steps without censure, and in time, render myself worthy of the promotion that I shall be favoured with now."

"I believe that under a skilled leader or a sensible person (whom I sincerely wish to serve), along with my own dedication and careful study of my responsibilities, I will be able to navigate my path without criticism and eventually prove myself worthy of the advancement I am being granted now."

The commission he solicited was transmitted to him by Mr. Corbin, in the following laconic letter:

The commission he requested was sent to him by Mr. Corbin in this brief letter:

"Dear George,—I inclose you your commission. God prosper you with it.

"Hey George,—I'm enclosing your commission. May God help you with it."

"Your friend, RICHARD CORBIN."

"Your friend, Richard Corbin."

[3] See note No. II. at the end of the volume.

[3] See note No. II. at the end of the volume.

[4] To the vote of thanks, the officers made the following reply:

[4] In response to the vote of thanks, the officers said the following:

"We, the officers of the Virginia regiment, are highly sensible of the particular mark of distinction with which you have honoured us, in returning your thanks for our behaviour in the late action; and can not help testifying our grateful acknowledgments, for your 'high sense' of what we shall always esteem a duty to our country and the best of kings.

"We, the officers of the Virginia regiment, truly appreciate the special recognition you have given us by thanking us for our conduct in the recent battle. We cannot help but express our heartfelt gratitude for your 'high sense' of what we will always view as our duty to our country and the greatest of kings."

"Favoured with your regard, we shall zealously endeavour to deserve your applause, and, by our future actions, strive to convince the worshipful house of burgesses, how much we esteem their approbation, and, as it ought to be, regard it as the voice of our country.

"With your support, we will work hard to earn your praise and, through our future actions, aim to show the honorable House of Burgesses just how much we value their approval, considering it, as it should be, the voice of our country."

"Signed for the whole corps,

"Signed for the entire corps,"

"GEO: WASHINGTON."

"GEO: WASHINGTON."

[5] Dr. Craik.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Dr. Craik.

[6] In another letter, he says, "We have been beaten, shamefully beaten—shamefully beaten by a handful of men, who only intended to molest and disturb our march! Victory was their smallest expectation! But see the wondrous works of Providence, the uncertainty of human things! We, but a few moments before, believed our numbers almost equal to the force of Canada; they only expected to annoy us. Yet, contrary to all expectation and human probability, and even to the common course of things, we were totally defeated, and have sustained the loss of every thing."

[6] In another letter, he writes, "We've been beaten, shamefully beaten—shamefully beaten by a small group of men, who only aimed to disrupt our march! Victory was their least expectation! But look at the amazing works of Providence, the unpredictability of human affairs! Just moments before, we thought our numbers were nearly equal to Canada's forces; they only hoped to bother us. Yet, against all odds and human reasoning, and even against the usual course of events, we were completely defeated, and we've lost everything."

[7] In a sermon preached not long after the defeat of General Braddock, the Rev. Mr. Davies, speaking of that disaster, and of the preservation of Colonel Washington, said: "I can not but hope that Providence has preserved that youth to be the saviour of this country." These words were afterwards considered as prophetic; and were applied by his countrymen to an event very opposite to that which was contemplated by the person who uttered them.

[7] In a sermon delivered shortly after General Braddock's defeat, Rev. Mr. Davies, while discussing that disaster and Colonel Washington's survival, said: "I can’t help but hope that Providence has saved that young man to be the savior of this country." These words were later seen as prophetic and were interpreted by his fellow countrymen in a way completely different from what the speaker intended.

[8] See note No. III. at the end of the volume.

[8] See note No. III. at the end of the volume.

[9] See note No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[9] See note No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[10] It is in the following terms:

It says this:

"Gentlemen,—Your kind congratulations on my appointment and arrival, demand my warmest acknowledgments, and will be ever retained in grateful remembrance. In exchanging the enjoyments of domestic life for the duties of my present honourable but arduous situation, I only emulate the virtue and public spirit of the whole Province of Massachusetts, which, with a firmness and patriotism without example, has sacrificed all the comforts of social and political life, in support of the rights of mankind, and the welfare of our common country. My highest ambition is to be the happy instrument of vindicating these rights, and to see this devoted Province again restored to peace, liberty, and safety.

"Gentlemen, — Thank you for your kind congratulations on my appointment and arrival; I truly appreciate it and will always remember it with gratitude. By leaving the comforts of home to take on the responsibilities of my current honorable yet challenging position, I aim to reflect the character and public spirit of the entire Province of Massachusetts, which, with unmatched determination and patriotism, has given up all the comforts of social and political life to uphold the rights of humanity and the well-being of our shared country. My greatest ambition is to be a positive force in defending these rights and to see this dedicated Province restored to peace, freedom, and safety."

"GEO: WASHINGTON."

"GEO: WASHINGTON."

[11] A circumstance attending this transaction, will furnish some idea of the difficulties encountered by those who then conducted the affairs of America. All-important to the general safety as was the speedy replenishment of the magazines of that army which lay encamped in front of the enemy, the committee of Elizabethtown was under the necessity of transmitting this powder secretly, lest the people of the neighbourhood should seize and detain it for their own security.

[11] A situation related to this transaction will give some sense of the challenges faced by those managing America's affairs at that time. Although it was crucial for the overall safety that the supplies for the army camped in front of the enemy were quickly restocked, the committee of Elizabethtown had to send this powder secretly, to prevent local residents from seizing it for their own protection.

[12] The General was under the necessity of carrying on a direct correspondence, not only with the several colonial governments, but with the committees of all the important towns and some inferior places.

[12] The General had to maintain direct communication, not just with the various colonial governments, but also with the committees of all the major towns and some lesser places.

[13] It is strange that an army should have been formed without such an officer.

[13] It's odd that an army was created without having such an officer.

[14] The agents of congress had the address to purchase all the powder on the coast of Africa, and that within the British forts, without attracting notice; and to seize the magazine in the island of Bermuda. Great exertions were also made in the interior to obtain saltpetre and sulphur, for the manufacture of that important article.

[14] The members of Congress managed to buy all the gunpowder along the coast of Africa, as well as that inside the British forts, without drawing attention; and to take control of the supply in Bermuda. Significant efforts were also put into the inland areas to gather saltpeter and sulfur for making that critical material.

[15] In this state of things, several officers, supposing that commissions and rank might depend on recruiting men, began, without permission, to recruit soldiers, to serve particularly under the officer enlisting them. Every military principle required that this practice should be arrested; and it was peremptorily forbidden in general orders.

[15] In this situation, several officers, thinking that their ranks and commissions might depend on bringing in new soldiers, started recruiting without permission, specifically for themselves. Every military guideline called for this practice to stop; it was strictly prohibited in general orders.

[16] On this application congress recommended that an assembly and council should be chosen in the usual way, who should exercise the powers of government until a Governor of his Majesty's appointment should consent to govern the colony according to its charter.

[16] In this application, Congress suggested that an assembly and council should be elected in the usual manner, who would hold the powers of government until a Governor appointed by His Majesty agreed to govern the colony according to its charter.

[17] See note No. V. at the end of the volume.

[17] See note No. V. at the end of the book.

[18] In the early part of the war, congress had appointed no commissary of prisoners; nor had the government taken upon itself the custody of them. They were entrusted for safe keeping to the respective legislatures and committees, to whom it was necessary to apply for the execution of every order respecting them.

[18] In the beginning of the war, Congress hadn’t appointed a commissary for prisoners, nor had the government assumed responsibility for them. They were entrusted for safekeeping to the individual legislatures and committees, and it was necessary to appeal to them to carry out any orders regarding these prisoners.

[19] Annual Register.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Yearly Register.

[20] Colonel Burr, since Vice President of the United States, was of this number.

[20] Colonel Burr, who later became the Vice President of the United States, was among them.

[21] In the account of this expedition much use has been made of a journal kept by Colonel Heth who served in it as a Lieutenant in Morgan's company of riflemen.

[21] In this account of the expedition, we have heavily drawn from a journal kept by Colonel Heth, who served as a Lieutenant in Morgan's riflemen company.

[22] Letter of Governor Carleton.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Governor Carleton's Letter.

[23] Annual Register.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Annual Report.

[24] In this account of the attempt to storm Quebec, free use is made of Colonel Heth's journal.

[24] This account of the attempt to take Quebec heavily relies on Colonel Heth's journal.

[25] On the first intelligence received in the camp at Boston of the fate of Montgomery, General Washington, though extremely delicate respecting the assumption of power, without waiting for the orders of congress, had immediately requested the New England governments to raise several regiments to reinforce that army. This proceeding was approved by congress.

[25] When the camp in Boston first learned about Montgomery's situation, General Washington, while being very careful about taking control, asked the New England governments to quickly raise several regiments to strengthen the army, without waiting for Congress's orders. Congress approved this action.

[26] They were accompanied by Mr. Carroll, a bishop of the Roman Catholic church.

[26] They were with Mr. Carroll, a bishop of the Roman Catholic Church.

[27] Whilst the troops of the United Colonies were flying from the vicinity of Quebec, an unexpected calamity befel them in a different quarter of that province.

[27] While the soldiers of the United Colonies were retreating from the area around Quebec, an unexpected disaster struck them in another part of the province.

Colonel Bedel, with three hundred and ninety continental troops and two field pieces, had been stationed at the Cedars, a point of land about forty miles above Montreal, which projected far into the St. Lawrence, and could be approached only on one side. Early in the spring, General Carleton had planned an expedition against this post, the execution of which was committed to Captain Forster, who commanded at an English station on Oswegachie. At the head of a company of regulars and a body of Indians, amounting in the whole to six hundred men, he appeared before the American works early in May. Two days previous to his appearance, Colonel Bedel had received intelligence of his approach; and, leaving the fort to be commanded by Major Butterfield, had proceeded himself to Montreal, to solicit assistance. Arnold, who then commanded at that place, immediately detached Major Sherburne to the Cedars with one hundred men; and prepared to follow, in person, at the head of a much larger force.

Colonel Bedel, with three hundred and ninety Continental troops and two cannons, had been stationed at the Cedars, a piece of land about forty miles above Montreal, which jutted out into the St. Lawrence and could only be accessed from one side. Early in the spring, General Carleton had planned a mission against this outpost, which was assigned to Captain Forster, who was in charge of a British station at Oswegatchie. Leading a company of regular troops and a group of Indians, totaling six hundred men, he showed up at the American fortifications in early May. Two days before his arrival, Colonel Bedel had gotten word of his approach; leaving the fort in the hands of Major Butterfield, he went to Montreal to request help. Arnold, who was in command there at the time, quickly sent Major Sherburne to the Cedars with one hundred men and prepared to follow personally with a much larger force.

Although the place could have been easily defended, the besiegers having no artillery—Major Butterfield, intimidated by the threat, that should any Indians be killed during the siege, it would be out of the power of Captain Forster to restrain the savages from massacreing every individual of the garrison, consented to a capitulation, by which the whole party became prisoners of war. The next day, Major Sherburne approached without having received any information that Butterfield had surrendered. Within about four miles of the Cedars, he was attacked by a considerable body of Indians; and, after a sharp conflict, surrendered at discretion.

Although the location could have been easily defended, the attackers had no artillery—Major Butterfield, intimidated by the threat that if any Indians were killed during the siege, Captain Forster wouldn't be able to stop the savages from massacring every person in the garrison, agreed to a surrender, making the entire group prisoners of war. The next day, Major Sherburne arrived without any knowledge that Butterfield had surrendered. About four miles from the Cedars, he was ambushed by a significant number of Indians; after a fierce fight, he surrendered unconditionally.

On being informed of these untoward events, Arnold, at the head of seven hundred men, marched against the enemy then at Vaudreuil, in the hope of recovering the American prisoners. When preparing for an engagement, he received a flag, accompanied by Major Sherburne, giving him the most positive assurances that if he persisted in his design, it would be entirely out of the power of Captain Forster to prevent his savages from pursuing their horrid customs, and disencumbering themselves of their prisoners by putting every man to death. This massacre was already threatened; and Major Sherburne confirmed the information. Under the influence of this threat, Arnold desisted from his purpose, and consented to a cartel, by which the prisoners were delivered up to him; he agreeing, among other things, not only to deliver as many British soldiers in exchange for them, but also, that they should immediately return to their homes.

After hearing about these unfortunate events, Arnold led seven hundred men to confront the enemy at Vaudreuil, hoping to rescue the American prisoners. As he was getting ready for battle, he received a flag and Major Sherburne, who provided him with strong assurances that if he continued with his plan, Captain Forster would be completely powerless to stop his warriors from carrying out their horrific practices and killing the prisoners. This massacre was already being threatened, and Major Sherburne confirmed the details. Faced with this threat, Arnold decided to abandon his mission and agreed to a deal that allowed for the prisoners to be handed over to him, in exchange for which he committed to delivering back as many British soldiers as possible and ensuring that they could return home immediately.

[28] Annual Register.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Yearly Register.

[29] Gazette-Remembrancer.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gazette-Remembrancer.

[30] The author was in this expedition, and relates the circumstances attending it chiefly from his own observation.

[30] The author participated in this expedition and mostly shares the details based on his own observations.

[31] Virginia Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Virginia Gazette.

[32] Annual Register—Gordon—Ramsay—Gazette.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Annual Register—Gordon—Ramsay—Gazette.

[33] Annual Register—Gordon—Ramsay—Letters of General Lee.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Annual Register—Gordon—Ramsay—General Lee's Letters.

[34] Before the vote on the question of independence was taken, congress passed resolutions, declaring that all persons residing within, or passing through any one of the United Colonies, owed allegiance to the government thereof; and that any such person who should levy war against any of the United Colonies, or adhere to the king of Great Britain, or other enemies of the said colonies, or any of them, should be guilty of treason: and recommending it to the several legislatures to pass laws for their punishment.

[34] Before the vote on independence was held, Congress passed resolutions stating that everyone living in or traveling through any of the United Colonies owed loyalty to its government. It declared that anyone who waged war against any of the United Colonies, supported the king of Great Britain, or sided with other enemies of those colonies would be committing treason and recommended that the individual legislatures create laws to punish such actions.

[35] Mr. Jefferson, Mr. John Adams, Mr. Franklin, and Mr. R.R. Livingston. Mr. R.H. Lee, the mover of the resolution, had been compelled by the illness of Mrs. Lee to leave congress the day on which the committee was appointed.

[35] Mr. Jefferson, Mr. John Adams, Mr. Franklin, and Mr. R.R. Livingston. Mr. R.H. Lee, who proposed the resolution, had to leave Congress due to Mrs. Lee's illness on the day the committee was appointed.

[36] See note No. VI. at the end of the volume.

[36] See note No. VI. at the end of the book.

[37] Mr. Jefferson's Correspondence.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Jefferson's Letters.

[38] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[39] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[40] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[41] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[42] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[43] He had, on the first appearance of the enemy in force before New York urged the removal of the women and children, with their most valuable effects, to a place of safety.

[43] When the enemy first showed up in large numbers outside New York, he insisted that the women and children, along with their most valuable belongings, be moved to a safe location.

[44] The author received the account of this skirmish from the Colonel of the third Virginia Regiment, and from the Captains commanding the companies that were engaged.

[44] The author got the details of this fight from the Colonel of the third Virginia Regiment and from the Captains leading the companies that were involved.

[45] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[46] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[47] Extract of a letter from General Greene, dated September 11th, 1778.

[47] Excerpt from a letter by General Greene, dated September 11, 1778.

"Remember the effect that the loss of the garrison of fort Washington had; there were men enough to have defended themselves against all the army had they not been struck with a panic; but, being most of them irregular troops, they lost their confidence when the danger began to grow pressing, and so fell a prey to their own fears."—Life of Greene, v. 1, p. 121.

"Think about the impact that losing the garrison at Fort Washington had; there were enough men to defend themselves against the entire army if they hadn't panicked. However, since most of them were irregular troops, they lost their confidence when the danger became more urgent, and as a result, they fell victim to their own fears."—Life of Greene, v. 1, p. 121.

[48] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[49] See note No. VII. at the end of the volume.

[49] See note No. VII. at the end of the volume.

[50] Since President of the United States.

[50] Since they became President of the United States.

[51] A fact has been stated to the author which shows to what an extent the plan might have been executed had it been possible to cross the river. Colonel Reed, who was with the division of Cadwallader, passed the ferry with the van of the infantry, and immediately despatched some trusty persons to examine the situation of the troops at Mount Holly. The report made by his messengers was, that they had looked into several houses in which the soldiers were quartered, and had found them generally fast asleep, under the influence, as was supposed, of the spirituous liquors they had drunk the preceding day, which was Christmas-day. That there appeared to be no apprehension of danger, nor precaution against it.

[51] A fact has been brought to the author's attention that shows how far the plan could have been carried out if crossing the river had been possible. Colonel Reed, who was with Cadwallader's division, crossed the ferry with the front line of infantry and quickly sent some reliable people to check on the situation of the troops at Mount Holly. The report from his messengers indicated that they had looked into several homes where the soldiers were staying and found them mostly fast asleep, likely under the influence of the alcoholic drinks they had consumed the day before, which was Christmas Day. There seemed to be no fear of danger or any precautions taken against it.

[52] In this critical moment, when correct intelligence was so all important, Mr. Robert Morris raised on his private credit in Philadelphia, five hundred pounds in specie, which he transmitted to the Commander-in-chief, who employed it in procuring information not otherwise to have been obtained.

[52] At this crucial moment, when accurate information was vital, Mr. Robert Morris used his personal credit in Philadelphia to raise five hundred pounds in cash, which he sent to the Commander-in-chief, who used it to gather intelligence that wouldn’t have been available otherwise.

[53] Ramsay.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ramsay.

[54] Ramsay.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ramsay.

[55] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. ii. p. 38, and post.

[55] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. ii. p. 38, and later.

[56] See note No. VIII. at the end of the volume.

[56] Check note No. VIII. at the end of the book.

[57] Congress voted a monument to his memory.

[57] Congress passed a bill for a monument in his honor.

[58] The extreme severity of the service, aided perhaps by the state of the hospitals, had carried to the grave more than two-thirds of the soldiers who had served the preceding campaign, and been engaged for more than one year.

[58] The harsh conditions of the service, possibly made worse by the state of the hospitals, had led to the deaths of over two-thirds of the soldiers who had fought in the previous campaign and had been enlisted for more than a year.

[59] General Howe's letter.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Howe's letter.

[60] General Howe's letter.

General Howe's letter.

[61] These orders were received by General Sullivan, who had been encamped about Hanover, in Jersey, on his return from an expedition to Staten Island. The British force on that island amounted to between two and three thousand men, of whom nearly one thousand were provincials, who were distributed along the coast, opposite the Jersey shore. The Europeans occupied a fortified camp near the watering place; and General Sullivan thought it practicable to surprise the provincials, and bring them off before they could be supported by the Europeans. Only six boats had been procured for the conveyance of his troops; yet they crossed over into the island before day undiscovered, and completely surprised two of the provincial parties, commanded by Colonels Lawrence and Barton, both of whom, with several officers and men were taken. The alarm being given, Sullivan attempted to withdraw from the island. The number of boats not being sufficient for the embarkation of all his troops at the same time, some confusion obtained among them. General Campbell advanced in force on the rear guard while waiting for the return of the boats, which was captured after making a gallant resistance.

[61] General Sullivan received these orders while he was camped near Hanover, New Jersey, on his way back from an expedition to Staten Island. The British force on Staten Island consisted of about two to three thousand soldiers, nearly a thousand of whom were local militia stationed along the coast, facing New Jersey. The European troops were set up in a fortified camp near the water source, and General Sullivan believed he could surprise the militia and take them before they got help from the Europeans. He had only secured six boats to transport his troops; however, they crossed over to the island before dawn without being detected and totally caught two militia units off guard, led by Colonels Lawrence and Barton, both of whom were captured along with several officers and men. Once the alarm was raised, Sullivan tried to retreat from the island. The insufficient number of boats for all his troops led to some confusion among them. General Campbell launched a forceful attack on the rear guard while waiting for the boats to return, which was eventually captured after putting up a brave fight.

This enterprise was well planned, and in its commencement, happily executed; but ought not to have been undertaken without a number of boats sufficient to secure the retreat.

This venture was well planned, and at its start, it was carried out successfully; however, it shouldn’t have been initiated without enough boats to ensure a safe retreat.

The loss of the British in prisoners amounted to eleven officers, and one hundred and thirty privates. That of the Americans, is stated by Sullivan, at one major, one captain, one lieutenant, and ten privates killed, and fifteen wounded, and nine officers, and one hundred and twenty-seven privates prisoners. General Campbell, in his account of the action says, that he made two hundred and fifty-nine prisoners, among whom were one lieutenant colonel, three majors, two captains, and fifteen inferior officers.

The British lost eleven officers and one hundred thirty privates as prisoners. According to Sullivan, the American losses included one major, one captain, one lieutenant, and ten privates killed, along with fifteen wounded, and nine officers and one hundred twenty-seven privates as prisoners. General Campbell, in his report on the battle, states that he captured two hundred fifty-nine prisoners, including one lieutenant colonel, three majors, two captains, and fifteen lower-ranking officers.

[62] The author was an eye-witness of this skirmish.

[62] The author witnessed this skirmish firsthand.

[63] Annual Register.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Yearly Register.

[64] The third Virginia regiment commanded by Colonel Marshall, which had performed extremely severe duty in the campaign of 1776, was placed in a wood on the right, and in front of Woodford's brigade, and Stephen's division. Though attacked by much superior numbers, it maintained its position without losing an inch of ground, until both its flanks were turned, its ammunition nearly expended, and more than half the officers, and one third of the soldiers were killed and wounded. Colonel Marshall, whose horse had received two balls, then retired in good order to resume his position on the right of his division; but it had already retreated.

[64] The third Virginia regiment, led by Colonel Marshall, which had endured very tough duty during the 1776 campaign, was positioned in a wooded area on the right, in front of Woodford's brigade and Stephen's division. Even though they were attacked by much larger forces, they held their ground without losing any territory until both their flanks were outmaneuvered, they were almost out of ammunition, and over half of their officers and one third of the soldiers were killed or injured. Colonel Marshall, whose horse had taken two shots, then withdrew in good order to return to his place on the right of his division; however, that division had already retreated.

[65] Deboore's brigade broke first; and, on an inquiry into his conduct being directed, he resigned. A misunderstanding existed between him and Sullivan, on whose right he was stationed.

[65] Deboore's brigade was the first to break, and when his actions were questioned, he resigned. There was a misunderstanding between him and Sullivan, who was stationed on his right.

[66] The British accounts represent the American loss to have been much more considerable. It probably amounted to at least three hundred men.

[66] The British reports claim that the American losses were much higher. It likely totaled at least three hundred men.

[67] Annual Register.—Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Annual Register.—Stedman.

[68] Better known as the Ridge road.

[68] More commonly referred to as Ridge Road.

[69] Since Robinson's.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Since Robinson's.

[70] The author was in this brigade, and describes this part of the action from his own observation.

[70] The author was part of this brigade and shares his perspective on this section of the action based on his own observations.

[71] On hearing that General Howe had landed at the head of the Chesapeake, Sir Henry Clinton, for the purpose of averting those aids which Washington might draw from the north of the Delaware, entered Jersey at the head of three thousand men. On the approach of General M'Dougal with a body of continental troops from Peekskill, and on hearing that the militia were assembling under General Dickinson, he returned to New York and Staten Island with the cattle he had collected, having lost in the expedition only eight men killed and twice as many wounded.

[71] When General Howe arrived at the head of the Chesapeake, Sir Henry Clinton moved into Jersey with three thousand troops to prevent Washington from getting any support from the north of the Delaware. As General M'Dougal approached with Continental troops from Peekskill and news came in that the militia was gathering under General Dickinson, he retreated to New York and Staten Island with the cattle he had gathered, losing only eight men killed and twice as many wounded during the operation.

M'Dougal continued his march towards the Delaware; and the utmost exertions were made both by Governor Livingston and General Dickinson to collect the militia for the purpose of aiding the army in Pennsylvania. The success of their exertions did not equal their wishes. The militia being of opinion that there was danger of a second invasion from New York, and that their services were more necessary at home than in Pennsylvania, assembled slowly and reluctantly. Five or six hundred crossed the Delaware at Philadelphia, about the time Sir William Howe crossed the Schuylkill, and were employed in the removal of stores. On the approach of the British army, they were directed to avoid it by moving up the Frankford road; but the commanding officer, having separated himself from his corps, was taken by a party of British horse employed in scouring the country; on which the regiment dispersed, and returned by different roads to Jersey. With much labour General Dickinson assembled two other corps amounting to about nine hundred men, with whom he was about to cross the Delaware when intelligence was received of the arrival at New York of a reinforcement from Europe. He was detained in Jersey for the defence of the state, and the militia designed to serve in Pennsylvania were placed under General Forman. About six hundred of them reached the army a few days before the battle of Germantown, immediately after which they were permitted to return.

M'Dougal continued his march towards the Delaware, and both Governor Livingston and General Dickinson made every effort to gather the militia to support the army in Pennsylvania. Unfortunately, their efforts didn’t match their hopes. The militia believed there was a threat of a second invasion from New York and thought their help was more needed at home than in Pennsylvania, so they gathered slowly and with reluctance. Five or six hundred crossed the Delaware at Philadelphia around the same time that Sir William Howe crossed the Schuylkill, and they were used to help move supplies. When the British army approached, they were instructed to avoid it by taking the Frankford road. However, the commanding officer became separated from his group and was captured by a British cavalry unit patrolling the area, which caused the regiment to scatter and return to Jersey by different routes. With a lot of effort, General Dickinson mustered two other groups totaling about nine hundred men, and he was preparing to cross the Delaware when news came that reinforcements from Europe had arrived in New York. He was held back in Jersey to defend the state, and the militia meant to serve in Pennsylvania were put under General Forman. About six hundred of them joined the army a few days before the Battle of Germantown, but shortly after that, they were allowed to go back.

[72] In stating the defence of Mud Island, the author has availed himself of the journal of Major Fleury.

[72] In discussing the defense of Mud Island, the author has made use of Major Fleury's journal.

[73] While Lord Cornwallis lay on Gloucester Point, about one hundred and fifty men of Morgan's rifle corps under Lieutenant Colonel Butler, and an equal number of militia, the whole under the Marquis de la Fayette, who still served as a volunteer, attacked a picket consisting of about three hundred men, and drove them with the loss of twenty or thirty killed, and a greater number wounded, quite into their camp; after which the Americans retired without being pursued.

[73] While Lord Cornwallis was stationed at Gloucester Point, around one hundred fifty men from Morgan's rifle corps, led by Lieutenant Colonel Butler, along with an equal number of militia under the Marquis de la Fayette—who was still serving as a volunteer—launched an attack on a picket of about three hundred men. They pushed them back, causing twenty to thirty casualties and a larger number wounded, all the way back into their camp. After this engagement, the Americans withdrew without being chased.

[74] While these transactions were passing on the Delaware, General Dickinson projected another expedition against the post on Staten Island. He collected about two thousand men, and requested General Putnam to make a diversion on the side of Kingsbridge, in order to prevent a reinforcement from New York.

[74] While these transactions were happening on the Delaware, General Dickinson planned another mission against the post on Staten Island. He gathered around two thousand men and asked General Putnam to create a distraction near Kingsbridge to stop reinforcements from New York.

Knowing that success depended on secrecy, he had concealed his object even from his field-officers, until eight of the night in which it was to be executed. Yet by three next morning, information of his design was given to General Skinner, who, being on his guard, saved himself and his brigade, by taking refuge, on the first alarm, in some works too strong to be carried by assault. A few prisoners were made and a few men killed, after which General Dickinson brought off his party with the loss of only three killed and ten slightly wounded.

Knowing that success depended on secrecy, he kept his plans hidden even from his field officers until eight o'clock that night when the operation was set to take place. However, by three the next morning, news of his scheme reached General Skinner, who, being alert, protected himself and his brigade by retreating to some fortifications that were too strong to be overtaken. A few prisoners were captured and a few men were killed, after which General Dickinson managed to pull his team out with only three killed and ten slightly wounded.

[75] The author states this on his own observation.

[75] The author mentions this based on his personal observation.

[76] Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stedman.

[77] When the command of the operating army was given to General Thomas in March 1776, the head quarters of General Schuyler had been fixed by congress at Albany, and that resolution remained in force. General Gates was now directed to repair to Ticonderoga and take command of the army; and Major General St. Clair was ordered to the same place to serve under him.

[77] When control of the operating army was handed over to General Thomas in March 1776, Congress had already established General Schuyler’s headquarters in Albany, and that decision remained in effect. General Gates was instructed to go to Ticonderoga and take charge of the army, and Major General St. Clair was also ordered to that location to serve under him.

[78] Remem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Remember.

[79] Letter of Burgoyne.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Burgoyne’s Letter.

[80] Letter of Burgoyne.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Burgoyne's Letter.

[81] Ibid.

Ibid.

[82] Gordon.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gordon.

[83] See note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

[83] See note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

[84] The islands in the mouth of the Mohawk.

[84] The islands at the mouth of the Mohawk River.

[85] Letter of Burgoyne.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Burgoyne's Letter.

[86] The accounts of the day stated that the Americans were commanded by General Arnold, but General Wilkinson says that no general officer was in the field.

[86] The reports from that day claimed that the Americans were led by General Arnold, but General Wilkinson says that there was no general officer present in the field.

[87] Remem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Remember.

[88] Letter of Burgoyne.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Burgoyne's letter.

[89] Remem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Remember.

[90] Mr. Gordon, in his history of the war, states himself to have received from General Glover an anecdote, showing, that all these advantages were on the point of being exposed to imminent hazard. "On the morning of the eleventh, Gates called the general officers together, and informed them of his having received certain intelligence, which might be depended upon, that the main body of Burgoyne's army was marched off for fort Edward with what they could take; and that the rear guard only was left in the camp, who, after awhile, were to push off as fast as possible, leaving the heavy baggage behind. On this it was concluded to advance and attack the camp in half an hour. The officers repaired immediately to their respective commands. General Nixon's being the eldest brigade, crossed the Saratoga creek first. Unknown to the Americans, Burgoyne had a line formed behind a parcel of brush-wood, to support the park of artillery where the attack was to be made. General Glover was upon the point of following Nixon. Just as he entered the water, he saw a British soldier making across, whom he called and examined." This soldier was a deserter, and communicated the very important fact that the whole British army were in their encampment. Nixon was immediately stopped: and the intelligence conveyed to Gates, who countermanded his orders for the assault, and called back his troops, not without sustaining some loss from the British artillery.

[90] Mr. Gordon, in his history of the war, reports that he received an anecdote from General Glover which shows that all these advantages were about to be put at serious risk. "On the morning of the eleventh, Gates gathered the general officers and informed them that he had received reliable intel indicating that the main part of Burgoyne's army had left for Fort Edward with whatever they could take, and only the rear guard remained in the camp, who were going to move out quickly, leaving the heavy baggage behind. It was decided to advance and attack the camp in half an hour. The officers went immediately to their commands. General Nixon's brigade, being the oldest, crossed the Saratoga Creek first. Unbeknownst to the Americans, Burgoyne had set up a line behind some brush to support the artillery where the attack was planned. General Glover was about to follow Nixon when he saw a British soldier crossing the creek and called him over to ask some questions." This soldier was a deserter and revealed the crucial information that the entire British army was still in their camp. Nixon was immediately halted, and the intel was passed to Gates, who canceled the attack orders and called back his troops, suffering some casualties from British artillery in the process.

Gordon is confirmed by General Wilkinson, who was adjutant general in the American army. The narrative of the general varies from that of Gordon only in minor circumstances.

Gordon is confirmed by General Wilkinson, who was the adjutant general in the American army. The general's account differs from Gordon's only in minor details.

[91] The American army consisted of nine thousand and ninety-three continental troops. The number of the militia fluctuated; but amounted, at the signature of the convention, to four thousand one hundred and twenty-nine. The sick exceeded two thousand five hundred men.

[91] The American army had nine thousand and ninety-three Continental troops. The militia's numbers varied, but at the time of the convention's signing, it totaled four thousand one hundred and twenty-nine. There were over two thousand five hundred sick men.

[92] Letter of Sir Henry Clinton.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Sir Henry Clinton.

[93] Letter of Sir Henry Clinton.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Sir Henry Clinton.

[94] Intelligence of the success of Sir Henry Clinton on the North River was received by General Burgoyne, in the night after the convention at Saratoga had been agreed upon, but before the articles had been signed and executed. The British general had serious thoughts of breaking off the treaty.

[94] News about Sir Henry Clinton's success on the North River reached General Burgoyne that night after the agreement at Saratoga, but before the articles were officially signed. The British general seriously considered canceling the treaty.

[95] Life of Chatham.—Belsham.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Life of Chatham.—Belsham.

[96] See note No. X. at the end of the volume.

[96] See note No. X. at the end of the volume.

[97] See note No. XI. at the end of the volume.

[97] See note No. XI. at the end of the book.

[98] See note No. XII. at the end of the volume.

[98] See note No. XII. at the end of the volume.

[99] Major Jameson was accidentally present, and engaged in this skirmish.

[99] Major Jameson happened to be there and got involved in this fight.

[100] General Conway, after his resignation, frequently indulged in expressions of extreme hostility to the Commander-in-chief. These indiscretions were offensive to the gentlemen of the army. In consequence of them, he was engaged in an altercation with General Cadwallader, which produced a duel, in which Conway received a wound, supposed for some time to be mortal. While his recovery was despaired of, he addressed the following letter to General Washington.

[100] General Conway, after resigning, often expressed intense hostility towards the Commander-in-chief. His outbursts offended the officers in the army. As a result, he got into a heated argument with General Cadwallader, which led to a duel, where Conway was wounded, and it was believed for a while that his injuries were fatal. While people were losing hope for his recovery, he sent the following letter to General Washington.

Philadelphia, July 23d, 1778.

Philadelphia, July 23, 1778.

Sir,—I find myself just able to hold the pen during a few minutes, and take this opportunity of expressing my sincere grief for having done, written, or said any thing disagreeable to your excellency. My career will soon be over, therefore, justice and truth prompt me to declare my last sentiments. You are, in my eyes, the great and good man. May you long enjoy the love, veneration, and esteem of these states, whose liberties you have asserted by your virtues.

Sir,—I find myself able to hold the pen for just a few minutes, so I want to take this opportunity to express my sincere regret for anything I may have done, written, or said that was disagreeable to you. My time is short, so justice and truth compel me to share my final thoughts. In my eyes, you are a great and good person. May you long enjoy the love, respect, and admiration of these states, whose freedoms you have defended with your virtues.

I am with the greatest respect, sir,

I have the utmost respect for you, sir,

Your excellency's most obedient humble servant,

Your excellency's most loyal and humble servant,

Phs. Conway.

PHS Conway.

[101] This request afforded the Commander-in-chief a fair retort on Major General Tryon. That officer had addressed a letter to him enclosing the bills brought into Parliament, and containing, to use the language of General Washington himself, "the more extraordinary and impertinent request" that their contents should be communicated through him to the army. General Washington now acknowledged the receipt of this letter, and, in return, enclosed to Governor Tryon copies of the resolution just mentioned, with a request that he would be instrumental in making them known to the persons on whom they were to operate.

[101] This request gave the Commander-in-Chief a solid comeback to Major General Tryon. That officer had sent him a letter with the bills introduced in Parliament, and it had, in the words of General Washington himself, "the more extraordinary and impertinent request" that their details should be shared with the army through him. General Washington acknowledged receiving this letter and included copies of the resolution mentioned earlier, asking Governor Tryon to help make them known to those affected.

[102] Congress, in their first instructions to their commissioners, directed them to press the immediate declaration of France in favour of the United States, by suggesting that a reunion with Great Britain might be the consequence of delay.—Secret Journals of Congress, v. ii. p. 30.

[102] Congress, in their initial instructions to their commissioners, urged them to advocate for France to immediately recognize the United States, by warning that delaying could lead to a reunion with Great Britain.—Secret Journals of Congress, v. ii. p. 30.

[103] In the execution of this agreement, the inconveniences arising from having committed the custody of prisoners to the several states, was severely felt. In addition to the delay inseparable from the necessity of inquiring for them, and collecting them from different places, they were often sent in without the knowledge of General Washington; and, in some instances, they passed unobserved, with permits from a state government, through his camp, into that of the enemy. These irregularities, and the remonstrances of the Commander-in-chief, at length, induced congress to appoint a commissary of prisoners.

[103] In carrying out this agreement, the challenges of leaving the custody of prisoners to the individual states were felt strongly. Besides the unavoidable delays that came from having to track them down and gather them from various locations, they were often sent in without General Washington’s knowledge; in some cases, they passed unnoticed through his camp to the enemy's lines with permits from a state government. These irregularities, along with complaints from the Commander-in-chief, ultimately led Congress to appoint a commissary of prisoners.

[104] See note No. XIII. at the end of the volume.

[104] See note No. XIII. at the end of the book.

[105] They alleged that their horses had been disabled, and the clothing embezzled.

[105] They claimed that their horses were disabled and that their clothing had been stolen.

[106] One of whom, by the by, he was.

[106] One of whom, by the way, he was.

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

spines (102K)

spines (102K)

George Washington

George Washington

George Washington

George Washington

From the portrait by Gilbert Stuart

From the portrait by Gilbert Stuart

This canvas, valued at $60,000, hangs in the Masonic Lodge rooms at Fredericksburg, Virginia. It is one of the several portraits of Washington which the artist began executing in 1795 and which are the most famous of both artist and sitter. Of our First President, this celebrated painter has also given us his interesting pen-picture of his subject: "All of his features were indications of the strongest and most ungovernable passions, and had he been born in the forest, he would have been the fiercest man among the savage tribes."

This painting, worth $60,000, is displayed in the Masonic Lodge in Fredericksburg, Virginia. It's one of several portraits of Washington that the artist started creating in 1795, and these are the most renowned works of both the artist and the subject. Regarding our First President, this acclaimed painter has also provided us with an intriguing description of him: "All of his features showed the strongest and most uncontrollable passions, and if he had been born in the forest, he would have been the fiercest man among the savage tribes."

THE

LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON,

COMMANDER IN CHIEF

OF THE

AMERICAN FORCES,

DURING THE WAR WHICH ESTABLISHED THE INDEPENDENCE OF HIS COUNTRY,

AND

FIRST PRESIDENT

OF THE

UNITED STATES.

COMPILED UNDER THE INSPECTION OF

THE HONOURABLE BUSHROD WASHINGTON,

FROM

ORIGINAL PAPERS

BEQUEATHED TO HIM BY HIS DECEASED RELATIVE, AND NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR.

TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,

AN INTRODUCTION,

CONTAINING A COMPENDIOUS VIEW OF THE COLONIES PLANTED BY THE ENGLISH ON THE

CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA,

FROM THEIR SETTLEMENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THAT WAR WHICH TERMINATED IN THEIR

INDEPENDENCE.

BY JOHN MARSHALL.

VOL. III.


THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

Printed in the U.S.A.

Made in the U.S.A.


titlepage (53K)

titlepage (53K)

subscription (117K)

subscription (117K)

 

THESE VOLUMES

THESE BOOKS

of The Sponsors' Edition

of The Sponsors' Edition

OF THE AUTHORIZED LIFE OF

AUTHORIZED LIFE OF

George Washington

George Washington

by John Marshall

by John Marshall

ISSUED IN ITS ORIGINAL FORMAT, BUT WITH THE TEXT OF THE REVISED EDITION, HAVE BEEN SPECIALLY PREPARED FOR

ISSUED IN ITS ORIGINAL FORMAT, BUT WITH THE TEXT OF THE REVISED EDITION, HAVE BEEN SPECIALLY PREPARED FOR

Henry H. Kimball

Henry H. Kimball

 


Transcriber's Note: In the original book, some proper names are spelled inconsistently. The inconsistencies have been preserved in this e-text. For the reader's information, the first of each of the following pairs of names is the correct spelling: Wemys/Wemyss, Tarleton/Tarlton; Dundass/Dundas; M'Lane/M'Clane; Viominel/Viominil.

Transcriber's Note: In the original book, some proper names are spelled inconsistently. The inconsistencies have been preserved in this e-text. For the reader's information, the first of each of the following pairs of names is the correct spelling: Wemys/Wemyss, Tarleton/Tarlton; Dundass/Dundas; M'Lane/M'Clane; Viominel/Viominil.


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy surprised.... Attempt on Lafayette at Barren hill.... General Howe resigns the command of the British army.... Is succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuates Philadelphia, and marches through the Jerseys.... A council of war which decides against attacking the British on their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee arrested.... Sentenced to be suspended for one year.... Thanks of Congress to General Washington and his army.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy was surprised.... There was an attempt on Lafayette at Barren Hill.... General Howe resigned from leading the British army.... He was succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuated Philadelphia and marched through the Jerseys.... A council of war decided against attacking the British during their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee was arrested.... He was sentenced to one year of suspension.... Congress thanked General Washington and his army.

CHAPTER II.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet.... Meditates an attack on the British fleet in New York harbour.... Relinquishes it.... Sails to Rhode Island.... Lord Howe appears off Rhode Island.... Both fleets dispersed by a storm.... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport.... D'Estaing returns.... Sails for Boston.... Sullivan expresses his dissatisfaction in general orders.... Raises the siege of Newport.... Action on Rhode Island.... The Americans retreat to the Continent.... Count D'Estaing expresses his dissatisfaction with Sullivan in a letter to congress.... General Washington labours successfully to heal these discontents.... Lord Howe resigns the command of the British fleet.... Colonel Baylor's regiment surprised.... Captain Donop defeated by Colonel Butler.... Expedition of the British against Egg Harbour.... Pulaski surprised.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet... Considers an attack on the British fleet in New York harbor... Decides against it... Sails to Rhode Island... Lord Howe shows up off Rhode Island... Both fleets are scattered by a storm... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport... D'Estaing returns... Sails for Boston... Sullivan voices his dissatisfaction in general orders... Lifts the siege of Newport... Action at Rhode Island... The Americans retreat to the mainland... Count D'Estaing shares his disappointment with Sullivan in a letter to Congress... General Washington works successfully to mend these grievances... Lord Howe steps down as the commander of the British fleet... Colonel Baylor's regiment is caught off guard... Captain Donop is defeated by Colonel Butler... British expedition against Egg Harbor... Pulaski is caught by surprise.

CHAPTER III.

Arrival of the British commissioners.... Terms of conciliation proposed.... Answer of congress to their propo[Pg iv]sitions.... Attempts of Mr. Johnson to bribe some members of congress.... His private letters ordered to be published.... Manifesto of the commissioners, and counter-manifesto of congress.... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, minister plenipotentiary of France.... Hostilities of the Indians.... Irruption into the Wyoming settlement.... Battle of Wyoming.... Colonel Dennison capitulates for the inhabitants.... Distress of the settlement.... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent.... Congress determines to invade Canada.... General Washington opposes the measure.... Induces congress to abandon it.

Arrival of the British commissioners... Proposed terms for settling things... Congress's response to their proposals... Mr. Johnson's attempts to bribe some congressional members... His private letters were ordered to be published... Manifesto from the commissioners and counter-manifesto from Congress... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, the French minister plenipotentiary... Hostilities from the Indians... Attack on the Wyoming settlement... Battle of Wyoming... Colonel Dennison surrenders for the inhabitants... Struggles in the settlement... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent... Congress decides to invade Canada... General Washington opposes the plan... He persuades Congress to abandon it.

CHAPTER IV.

Divisions in Congress.... Letters of General Washington on the state of public affairs.... Invasion of Georgia.... General Howe defeated by Colonel Campbell.... Savannah taken.... Sunbury surrenders.... Georgia reduced.... General Lincoln takes command of the Southern army.... Major Gardener defeated by General Moultrie.... Insurrection of the Tories in South Carolina.... They are defeated by Colonel Pickens.... Ash surprised and defeated.... Moultrie retreats.... Prevost marches to Charleston.... Lincoln attacks the British at Stono Ferry unsuccessfully.... Invasion of Virginia.

Divisions in Congress... Letters from General Washington about the state of public affairs... Invasion of Georgia... General Howe is defeated by Colonel Campbell... Savannah is captured... Sunbury surrenders... Georgia is taken... General Lincoln takes charge of the Southern army... Major Gardener is defeated by General Moultrie... Tory insurrection in South Carolina... They are defeated by Colonel Pickens... Ash is caught off guard and defeated... Moultrie retreats... Prevost marches to Charleston... Lincoln unsuccessfully attacks the British at Stono Ferry... Invasion of Virginia.

CHAPTER V.

Discontents in a part of the American army.... Letter from General Washington on the subject.... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Indian settlement.... Expedition against the Indians meditated.... Fort Fayette surrendered to the British.... Invasion of Connecticut.... General Wayne storms Stony Point.... Expedition against Penobscot.... Powles Hook surprised by Major Lee.... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot.... Of the Count D'Estaing.... Siege of Savannah.... Unsuccessful attempt to storm that place.... Siege raised.... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown.... Spain offers her me[Pg v]diation to the belligerents.... Declares war against England.... Letter from General Washington to congress respecting the annual formation of the army.... The army goes into winter quarters.

Discontent in part of the American army... Letter from General Washington about the situation... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Native settlement... Expedition against the Natives planned... Fort Fayette surrendered to the British... Invasion of Connecticut... General Wayne storms Stony Point... Expedition against Penobscot... Powles Hook surprised by Major Lee... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot... Of Count D'Estaing... Siege of Savannah... Unsuccessful attempt to storm the place... Siege lifted... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown... Spain offers to mediate between the warring parties... Declares war against England... Letter from General Washington to Congress regarding the annual formation of the army... The army goes into winter quarters.

CHAPTER VI.

South Carolina invaded.... The British fleet passes the bar, and gets possession of the harbour of Charleston.... Opinion of General Washington on the propriety of defending that place.... Sir Henry Clinton invests the town.... Tarleton surprises an American corps at Monk's Corner.... Fort Moultrie surrendered.... Tarleton defeats Colonel White.... General Lincoln capitulates.... Buford defeated.... Arrangements for the government of South Carolina and Georgia.... Sir Henry Clinton embarks for New York.... General Gates takes command of the Southern army.... Is defeated near Camden.... Death of De Kalb.... Success of General Sumpter.... He is defeated.

South Carolina was invaded. The British fleet crossed the bar and took control of the harbor in Charleston. General Washington shared his thoughts on whether it was wise to defend that location. Sir Henry Clinton surrounded the town. Tarleton caught an American group off guard at Monk's Corner. Fort Moultrie fell. Tarleton defeated Colonel White. General Lincoln surrendered. Buford was defeated. Plans were made for governing South Carolina and Georgia. Sir Henry Clinton left for New York. General Gates took charge of the Southern army but was defeated near Camden. De Kalb died. General Sumpter had some success but was ultimately defeated.

CHAPTER VII.

Distress in the American camp.... Expedition against Staten Island.... Requisitions on the states.... New scheme of finance.... Committee of congress deputed to camp.... Resolution to make up depreciation of pay.... Mutiny in the line of Connecticut.... General Knyphausen enters Jersey.... Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York.... Skirmish at Springfield.... Exertions to strengthen the army.... Bank established in Philadelphia.... Contributions of the ladies.... Farther proceedings of the states.... Arrival of a French armament in Rhode Island.... Changes in the quartermaster's department.... Enterprise against New York abandoned.... Naval superiority of the British.

Distress in the American camp... Expedition against Staten Island... Requests from the states... New financial plan... Congress committee sent to the camp... Decision to address the decline in pay... Mutiny among the Connecticut troops... General Knyphausen enters New Jersey... Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York... Skirmish at Springfield... Efforts to strengthen the army... Bank established in Philadelphia... Contributions from the women... Ongoing actions from the states... Arrival of a French fleet in Rhode Island... Changes in the quartermaster's department... Mission against New York called off... British naval dominance.

CHAPTER VIII.

Treason and escape of Arnold.... Trial and execution of Major André.... Precautions for the security of West[Pg vi] Point.... Letter of General Washington on American affairs.... Proceedings of congress respecting the army.... Major Talmadge destroys the British stores at Coram.... The army retires into winter quarters.... Irruption of Major Carleton into New York.... European transactions.

Treason and escape of Arnold... Trial and execution of Major André... Measures for the security of West[Pg vi] Point... Letter from General Washington about American affairs... Actions of Congress regarding the army... Major Talmadge destroys British supplies at Coram... The army goes into winter quarters... Major Carleton's incursion into New York... European developments.

CHAPTER IX.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia.... Defeat of Ferguson.... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina.... Retreat out of that state.... Major Wemys defeated by Sumpter.... Tarleton repulsed.... Greene appointed to the command of the Southern army.... Arrives in camp.... Detaches Morgan over the Catawba.... Battle of the Cowpens.... Lord Cornwallis drives Greene through North Carolina into Virginia.... He retires to Hillsborough.... Greene recrosses the Dan.... Loyalists under Colonel Pyle cut to pieces.... Battle of Guilford.... Lord Cornwallis retires to Ramsay's mills.... To Wilmington.... Greene advances to Ramsay's mills.... Determines to enter South Carolina.... Lord Cornwallis resolves to march to Virginia.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia... Defeat of Ferguson... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina... Retreats out of that state... Major Wemys is defeated by Sumpter... Tarleton is pushed back... Greene is appointed to lead the Southern army... Arrives in camp... Sends Morgan over the Catawba... Battle of the Cowpens... Lord Cornwallis forces Greene to retreat through North Carolina into Virginia... He pulls back to Hillsborough... Greene crosses the Dan again... Loyalists led by Colonel Pyle are wiped out... Battle of Guilford... Lord Cornwallis retreats to Ramsay's mills... Then to Wilmington... Greene moves to Ramsay's mills... Decides to enter South Carolina... Lord Cornwallis plans to march to Virginia.

CHAPTER X.

Virginia invaded by Arnold.... He destroys the stores at Westham and at Richmond.... Retires to Portsmouth.... Mutiny in the Pennsylvania line.... Sir H. Clinton attempts to negotiate with the mutineers.... They compromise with the civil government.... Mutiny in the Jersey line.... Mission of Colonel Laurens to France.... Propositions to Spain.... Recommendations relative to a duty on imported and prize goods.... Reform in the Executive departments.... Confederation adopted.... Military transactions.... Lafayette detached to Virginia.... Cornwallis arrives.... Presses Lafayette.... Expedition to Charlottesville, to the Point of Fork.... Lafayette forms a junction with Wayne.... Cornwallis retires to the lower country.... General Washington's letters are intercepted.... Action near Jamestown.[Pg vii]

Virginia was invaded by Arnold... He destroyed the supplies at Westham and Richmond... Then he retreated to Portsmouth... There was a mutiny among the Pennsylvania line... Sir H. Clinton tried to negotiate with the mutineers... They reached a compromise with the civil government... Another mutiny occurred in the Jersey line... Colonel Laurens was sent on a mission to France... Proposals were made to Spain... Recommendations were made regarding a tax on imported and captured goods... There were reforms in the Executive departments... The Confederation was adopted... Military actions took place... Lafayette was sent to Virginia... Cornwallis arrived... He pressured Lafayette... There was an expedition to Charlottesville, at the Point of Fork... Lafayette joined forces with Wayne... Cornwallis retreated to the southern region... General Washington's letters were intercepted... There was an engagement near Jamestown.[Pg vii]

CHAPTER XI.

Farther state of affairs in the beginning of the year 1781.... Measures of Mr. Morris, the superintendent of finances.... Designs of General Washington against New York.... Count Rochambeau marches to the North River.... Intelligence from the Count de Grasse.... Plan of operations against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval engagement.... The combined armies march for the Chesapeake.... Yorktown invested.... Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.

Farther state of affairs at the start of 1781.... Actions taken by Mr. Morris, the head of finances.... General Washington's plans against New York.... Count Rochambeau heads to the North River.... Updates from Count de Grasse.... Strategy against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval battle.... The combined forces move toward the Chesapeake.... Yorktown is besieged.... Lord Cornwallis surrenders.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


ILLUSTRATIONS

George Washington, by Gilbert Stuart

Martha Washington, by Gilbert Stuart

George Washington, by John Trumbull

The Ruins of Stony Point—On the Hudson

Beverly Robinson Mansion at West Point

Where Washington Stayed During André's Trial

The Moore House at Yorktown, Virginia


THE LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON


CHAPTER I.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy surprised.... Attempt on Lafayette at Barren Hill.... General Howe resigns the command of the British army.... Is succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuates Philadelphia, and marches through the Jerseys.... A council of war which decides against attacking the British on their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee arrested.... Sentenced to be suspended for one year.... Thanks of congress to General Washington and his army.

Incursion into Jersey.... General Lacy was surprised.... Attempt on Lafayette at Barren Hill.... General Howe resigned from commanding the British army.... He was succeeded by Sir H. Clinton.... He evacuated Philadelphia and marched through the Jerseys.... A council of war decided against attacking the British during their march.... Battle of Monmouth.... General Lee was arrested.... He was sentenced to be suspended for one year.... Congress expressed thanks to General Washington and his army.

 

1778

The position at Valley Forge had been taken for the purposes of covering the country, protecting the magazines, and cutting off all supplies to Philadelphia. Although the intercourse of the inhabitants with that place could not be entirely prevented; the sufferings of the British army from the scarcity of fresh provisions and forage were considerable; and, as the spring opened, several expeditions were undertaken both to relieve their own wants, and to distress the army of the United States.[Pg 2]

The position at Valley Forge was established to secure the area, protect the supply depots, and cut off all supplies to Philadelphia. Although the locals' interactions with that city couldn't be completely stopped, the British army faced significant hardships due to a shortage of fresh food and forage. As spring arrived, several missions were planned to address their needs and to hinder the United States army.[Pg 2]

About the middle of March, Colonel Mawhood and Major Simcoe, who were detached into Jersey at the head of about twelve hundred men, landed at Salem, nearly opposite Reedy Island, and dispersed the small bodies of militia who were stationed in that part of the country.

About mid-March, Colonel Mawhood and Major Simcoe, who were deployed to Jersey with around twelve hundred men, landed at Salem, directly across from Reedy Island, and scattered the small groups of militia that were stationed in that area.

General Washington had given early intelligence of this expedition to Governor Livingston; and had requested that he would immediately order out the militia to join Colonel Shreve, whose regiment was detached into Jersey; but the legislature had neglected to make provision for paying them; and the governor could not bring them into the field. Colonel Shreve, on his arrival at Haddonfield, the place at which they had been directed to assemble, found less than one hundred men. March 23.Colonel Ellis, their commanding officer, remarked, in a letter to the governor, that "without some standing force, little was to be expected from the militia, who, being alone not sufficient to prevent the incursions of the enemy, each one naturally consults his own safety, by not being found in arms."

General Washington had informed Governor Livingston early about this mission and requested that he quickly call up the militia to join Colonel Shreve, whose regiment was sent to New Jersey. However, the legislature had failed to arrange for their payment, so the governor couldn’t send them into the field. When Colonel Shreve arrived in Haddonfield, where they were supposed to gather, he found fewer than a hundred men. March 23rd. Colonel Ellis, their commanding officer, mentioned in a letter to the governor that "without some permanent force, not much can be expected from the militia, who, being insufficient on their own to stop enemy incursions, will naturally look out for their own safety by avoiding being in arms."

Mawhood, of course, was unrestrained; and the devastation committed by his party was wantonly distressing. Its course of destruction was preceded by a summons to Colonel Hand, the commanding officer of the militia, to lay down his arms, which was accompanied with a threat of the consequences to result from his refusal. This threat was too faithfully executed.[Pg 3]

Mawhood, of course, was out of control; and the damage done by his party was shockingly distressing. Their path of destruction began with a demand to Colonel Hand, the militia's commanding officer, to surrender his weapons, accompanied by a warning about the consequences of noncompliance. This warning was carried out all too faithfully.[Pg 3]

After completing his forage, without molestation, Mawhood returned to Philadelphia. During the continuance of this incursion, which lasted six or seven days, not more than two hundred men could be collected to reinforce Colonel Shreve, who was consequently unable to effect any thing, and did not even march to the lower parts of Jersey, which were plundered without restraint.[1]

After finishing his search for supplies without any trouble, Mawhood went back to Philadelphia. During this invasion, which lasted about six or seven days, only around two hundred men could be gathered to support Colonel Shreve, who therefore couldn't do anything and didn't even march to the southern parts of Jersey, which were looted freely.[1]

May 1.

Not long after this incursion into Jersey, an enterprise was undertaken against General Lacy, who, with a small number of Pennsylvania militia, seldom amounting to six hundred, and sometimes not exceeding fifty, watched the roads leading to Philadelphia on the north side of the Schuylkill, and was generally posted within twenty miles of that town.

Not long after this invasion of Jersey, a mission was launched against General Lacy, who, with a small group of Pennsylvania militia, rarely numbering more than six hundred and sometimes as few as fifty, kept an eye on the roads leading to Philadelphia on the north side of the Schuylkill and was usually stationed within twenty miles of that city.

General Lacy surprised.

This expedition was entrusted to Colonel Abercrombie and Major Simcoe, who avoided all the posts Lacy had established for his security, and threw a body of troops into his rear before he discovered their approach. After a short resistance, he escaped with the loss of a few men killed, and all his baggage. His corps were entirely dispersed, and he was soon afterwards relieved by General Potter.

This mission was given to Colonel Abercrombie and Major Simcoe, who bypassed all the posts Lacy had set up for his protection and positioned a group of troops behind him before he realized they were coming. After a brief fight, he managed to escape but lost a few men and all his supplies. His unit was completely scattered, and he was soon after rescued by General Potter.

To maintain the command of the water as far as was practicable, congress had ordered impediments to be sunk in many of the rivers of common use, so as to obstruct the passage up them,[Pg 4] and had constructed frigates, and other smaller vessels, to be employed above those impediments or elsewhere, as the occasion might require. Several of them had been commenced above Philadelphia, but were not completed when the British obtained the command of the river. General Washington then became apprehensive for their safety, and repeatedly expressed his desire that they should be sunk in such a manner as to be weighed with difficulty, should any attempt be made to raise them. The persons, however, who were entrusted by congress with this business, supposed it would be equally secure to put plugs in their bottoms, which might be drawn out on the approach of danger.

To maintain control over the water as much as possible, Congress ordered obstacles to be placed in many commonly used rivers to block passage upstream,[Pg 4] and built frigates and smaller vessels to be used above those obstacles or elsewhere as needed. Some of these had been started above Philadelphia, but they weren't finished when the British took control of the river. General Washington then became concerned for their safety and repeatedly expressed his wish that they be sunk in such a way that they would be hard to raise if someone tried. However, the people entrusted by Congress with this task thought it would be just as safe to put plugs in the bottoms, which could be removed if danger approached.

Against these vessels, and some stores collected at Bordentown, an expedition was planned which ended in their total destruction. General Dickenson was in the neighbourhood, but his force was too small to interrupt the execution of the design; and General Maxwell, who had been ordered to his assistance, was retarded in his march by a heavy rain, which did not obstruct the movement of the British, who passed up the river in vessels.

Against these ships, along with some supplies gathered at Bordentown, an operation was planned that resulted in their complete destruction. General Dickenson was nearby, but his troops were too few to disrupt the plan. General Maxwell, who had been sent to help him, was delayed in his march by a heavy rain, which didn’t hinder the British, who moved up the river in their vessels.

May 18.

To cover the country more effectually on the north of the Schuylkill, to form an advance guard for the security of the main army, and to be in readiness to annoy the rear of the enemy, should he evacuate Philadelphia, an event believed to be in contemplation, General Wash[Pg 5]ington detached the Marquis de Lafayette, with more than two thousand choice troops, to take post near the lines. As this corps formed a very valuable part of the army, the Commander-in-chief recommended in his instructions to General Lafayette the utmost attention to its safety; and, particularly, to avoid any permanent station, as a long continuance in one position would facilitate the execution of measures which might be concerted against him.

To better cover the area north of the Schuylkill, provide a security detail for the main army, and be ready to harass the enemy's rear if they decide to leave Philadelphia—a move that was suspected to be planned—General Washington sent the Marquis de Lafayette, along with over two thousand elite troops, to position himself near the lines. Since this group was a crucial part of the army, the Commander-in-chief emphasized in his instructions to General Lafayette the importance of keeping it safe, and specifically, to avoid settling down in one place for too long, as staying in one spot could make it easier for the enemy to carry out plans against them.

The Marquis crossed the Schuylkill and took post near Barren Hill church, eight or ten miles in front of the army. Attempt on Lafayette at Barren Hill.Immediate notice[2] of his arrival was given to Sir William Howe, who reconnoitred his position, and formed a plan to surprise and cut him off.

The Marquis crossed the Schuylkill River and set up near Barren Hill church, about eight or ten miles ahead of the army. Attack on Lafayette at Barren Hill. Immediate notice[2] of his arrival was sent to Sir William Howe, who surveyed his position and made a plan to surprise and capture him.

On the night of the 19th of May, General Grant with five thousand select troops, took the road which leads up the Delaware, and consequently diverges from Barren Hill. After marching some distance, he inclined to the left, and passing White Marsh, where several roads unite, took one leading to Plymouth meeting-house, the position he was directed to occupy, some[Pg 6]thing more than a mile in the rear of the Marquis, between him and Valley Forge. May 20.He reached his point of destination rather before sunrise. Here the roads fork; the one leading to the camp of Lafayette, and the other to Matron's ford over the Schuylkill.

On the night of May 19th, General Grant, with five thousand elite troops, took the road leading up the Delaware, which veered away from Barren Hill. After marching for a while, he turned left and passed White Marsh, where several roads come together. He took the route heading to Plymouth Meeting House, the location he was supposed to occupy, a little over a mile behind the Marquis, situated between him and Valley Forge. May 20. He arrived at his destination just before sunrise. Here, the roads split; one leads to Lafayette's camp and the other to Matron's Ford over the Schuylkill.

In the course of the night, General Gray, with a strong detachment, had advanced up the Schuylkill on its south side, along the ridge road, and taken post at a ford two or three miles in front of the right flank of Lafayette, while the residue of the army encamped on Chestnut hill.

During the night, General Gray, along with a strong group, moved up the Schuylkill on its south side, along the ridge road, and set up a position at a ford two or three miles in front of Lafayette's right flank, while the rest of the army camped on Chestnut Hill.

Captain M'Clane, a vigilant partisan of great merit, was posted on the lines some distance in front of Barren Hill. In the course of the night, he fell in with two British grenadiers at Three Mile Run, who informed him of the movement made by Grant, and also that a large body of Germans was getting ready to march up the Schuylkill. Immediately conjecturing the object, M'Clane detached Captain Parr, with a company of riflemen across the country to Wanderers hill, with orders to harass and retard the column advancing up the Schuylkill, and hastened in person[3] to the camp of Lafayette. He arrived soon after daybreak, and communicated the intelligence he had received. It was, not[Pg 7] long afterwards, confirmed by the fire of Parr on the Ridge road, and by an inhabitant who had escaped from White Marsh as the British column passed that place.[4]

Captain M'Clane, a dedicated and skilled officer, was stationed a distance in front of Barren Hill. During the night, he encountered two British grenadiers at Three Mile Run, who informed him about Grant's movements and that a large group of Germans was preparing to march up the Schuylkill. Immediately realizing the intention, M'Clane sent Captain Parr with a company of riflemen across the country to Wanderers Hill, with orders to disrupt and delay the advancing column. He then rushed to Lafayette's camp himself. He arrived shortly after dawn and shared the information he had gathered. It wasn't long afterwards that this was confirmed by Parr's gunfire on the Ridge Road and by a local resident who had escaped from White Marsh as the British column passed through.

Thus surrounded with danger, Lafayette took with promptitude and decision the only course which could preserve him. He instantly put his troops in motion, and passed over at Matron's ford, which was rather nearer to General Grant, than to himself, without being intercepted by that officer, or sustaining a greater loss than nine men.

Thus surrounded by danger, Lafayette quickly and decisively chose the only course that could save him. He immediately mobilized his troops and crossed at Matron's ford, which was closer to General Grant than to himself, without being intercepted by that officer or suffering a greater loss than nine men.

General Grant, who reached the ground lately occupied by Lafayette soon after it was abandoned, followed his rear, and appeared at the[Pg 8] ford just after the Americans had crossed it; but, finding them advantageously posted, did not choose to attack them; and the whole army returned to Philadelphia, having effected nothing.

General Grant, who arrived at the spot recently occupied by Lafayette shortly after it was abandoned, followed his path and showed up at the[Pg 8]ford just after the Americans had crossed it; however, seeing that they were in a strong position, he decided not to attack them, and the entire army went back to Philadelphia, having accomplished nothing.

He did not escape censure for having allowed the great advantage he had acquired, to slip through his hands unused. He might with the utmost certainty have reached Matron's ford before the Marquis, and have cut off the only retreat which remained for him. But the same skill and address were not displayed in executing this plan as in forming it.[5]

He didn't avoid criticism for letting the significant opportunity he had gained slip away without using it. He could have definitely reached Matron's ford before the Marquis and blocked the only escape route left for him. However, he didn’t show the same skill and cleverness in carrying out this plan as he did in creating it.[5]

In the statement of this affair made by General Lafayette, he represents himself to have advanced the head of a column towards Grant, as if to attack him, while the rear filed off rapidly towards the Schuylkill. This movement gained ground even for the front, which, while it advanced towards the enemy, also approached the river, and at the same time induced General Grant to halt, in order to prepare for battle.

In the account of this situation given by General Lafayette, he says that he moved the front of a column toward Grant, as if to attack him, while the rear quickly moved away toward the Schuylkill. This maneuver made progress not just for the front, which advanced toward the enemy while also getting closer to the river, but it also caused General Grant to stop and prepare for battle.

While this manœuvre was performing in the face of the detachment under Grant, a small party was thrown into the church yard, on the road towards General Gray, which also gave the appearance of an intention to attack in that quarter. By these dispositions, happily conceived, and executed with regularity, the Mar[Pg 9]quis extricated himself from the destruction which had appeared almost inevitable. In a letter to congress, General Washington termed it "a timely and handsome retreat," and certainly the compliment was merited.

While this maneuver was taking place in front of the forces under Grant, a small group was sent into the churchyard, on the road toward General Gray, which also created the impression that an attack was planned in that direction. With these well-thought-out moves, carried out systematically, the Marquis managed to escape from what seemed like certain destruction. In a letter to Congress, General Washington called it "a timely and impressive retreat," and that praise was definitely well-deserved.

It might be supposed that this young nobleman had not displayed the same degree of military talent in guarding against the approach of danger, as in extricating himself from it. But the imputation which generally attaches to an officer who permits an enemy to pass unobserved into his rear, is removed by a circumstance stated by Lafayette. The Pennsylvania militia were posted on his left flank with orders to guard the roads about White Marsh. Without his knowledge, they changed their position, and retired into the rear, leaving that important pass open to the enemy.

It might be thought that this young nobleman didn’t show the same level of military skill in preventing danger as he did in escaping it. However, the blame typically directed at an officer who allows an enemy to sneak into his rear is lifted by a point made by Lafayette. The Pennsylvania militia were stationed on his left flank with orders to secure the roads around White Marsh. Unbeknownst to him, they changed their position and withdrew to the rear, leaving that crucial route vulnerable to the enemy.

General Howe resigns his command and returns to England; is succeeded by Sir Henry Clinton.

This was the last enterprise attempted by Sir William Howe. He resigned the command of the army into the hands of Sir Henry Clinton, and embarked for Great Britain. About the same time, orders were received for the evacuation of Philadelphia. The part it was now evident France was about to take in the war, and the naval force which had been prepared by that power before she declared herself, rendered that city a dangerous position, and determined the administration to withdraw the army from the Delaware.[Pg 10]

This was the final effort made by Sir William Howe. He handed over command of the army to Sir Henry Clinton and set sail for Great Britain. Around the same time, orders came in to evacuate Philadelphia. It was clear that France was about to become involved in the war, and the naval force that had been assembled by France before they officially joined made that city a risky location, prompting the administration to pull the army out of the Delaware.[Pg 10]

The preparations for this movement could not be made unobserved; but they indicated equally an embarkation of the whole army, or an intention to march to New York through Jersey. The last was believed by the American chief to be most probable; and he made every exertion to take advantage of the movement. His detachments were called in, and the state governments were pressed to expedite the march of their levies.

The preparations for this movement couldn’t go unnoticed; however, they suggested either a full army deployment or a plan to march to New York through New Jersey. The American leader thought the latter was more likely, and he worked hard to capitalize on the situation. He recalled his detachments and urged the state governments to speed up the deployment of their troops.

In the mean time Sir Henry Clinton hastened his preparations for the evacuation of Philadelphia; and the opinion that he intended to reach New York through Jersey, gained ground.

In the meantime, Sir Henry Clinton sped up his preparations for evacuating Philadelphia, and the belief that he planned to get to New York via New Jersey grew stronger.

General Maxwell, with the Jersey brigade, was ordered over the Delaware to take post at Mount Holly, and to join Major General Dickenson, who was assembling the militia of that state for the purpose of co-operating with the continental troops, in breaking down the bridges, felling trees in the roads, and otherwise embarrassing the march of the British General.

General Maxwell, along with the Jersey brigade, was ordered across the Delaware to set up at Mount Holly and join Major General Dickenson, who was gathering the state's militia to work with the continental troops in tearing down bridges, chopping down trees in the roads, and creating obstacles for the British General's march.

June 17.

In this state of things intelligence was received that a great part of the British army had crossed the Delaware, and that the residue would soon follow.

In this situation, news came in that a large portion of the British army had crossed the Delaware, and that the rest would soon follow.

The opinion of the general officers was required on the course now to be pursued. General Lee, who had been lately exchanged, and whose experience gave great weight to his opinions, was vehement against risking either a gen[Pg 11]eral or partial engagement. The British army was computed at ten thousand effective men, and that of the Americans amounted to between ten and eleven thousand. General Lee was decidedly of opinion that, with such an equality of force, it would be "criminal" to hazard an action. He relied much on the advantageous ground on which their late foreign connexions had placed the United States, and contended that defeat alone could now endanger their independence. To this he said the army ought not to be exposed. It would be impossible he thought to bring on a partial action, without risking its being made general, should such be the choice of the enemy, since the detachment which might engage must be supported, or be cut to pieces. A general action ought not to be fought unless the advantage was manifestly with the American army. This at present was not the case. He attributed so much to the superior discipline of the enemy as to be of opinion that the issue of the engagement would be, almost certainly, unfavourable.

The views of the senior officers were needed on the direction to take next. General Lee, who had recently been exchanged, and whose experience carried significant weight, was strongly opposed to risking either a general or partial engagement. The British army was estimated to have about ten thousand effective troops, while the Americans had between ten and eleven thousand. General Lee firmly believed that with such a close match in forces, it would be "criminal" to engage in battle. He placed great importance on the advantageous position that their recent foreign connections had given the United States and argued that only defeat could now put their independence at risk. To this, he said the army should not be exposed. He thought it would be impossible to initiate a partial engagement without the risk of it escalating to a general battle, should the enemy choose that route, since any detachment that might engage would need support or risk being overwhelmed. A general battle should only be fought if it was clearly advantageous for the American army, which was not the situation at the moment. He believed the enemy's superior discipline meant that the outcome of the engagement would almost certainly be unfavorable.

General Du Portail, a French officer of considerable reputation, maintained the same opinions; and the Baron de Steuben concurred in them. The American officers seem to have been influenced by the councils of the Europeans; and, of seventeen generals, only Wayne and Cadwallader were decidedly in favour of attacking the enemy. Lafayette appeared inclined to that[Pg 12] opinion without openly embracing it; and General Greene was inclined to hazard more than the councils of the majority would sanction. The country, he thought, must be protected; and if, in doing so, an engagement should become unavoidable, it would be necessary to fight.

General Du Portail, a well-respected French officer, held the same views, and the Baron de Steuben agreed with him. The American officers seemed to be swayed by the advice of their European counterparts; of seventeen generals, only Wayne and Cadwallader were clearly in favor of attacking the enemy. Lafayette seemed to lean toward that[Pg 12] opinion without fully committing to it, while General Greene was willing to take more risks than what the majority was comfortable with. He believed the country needed to be defended, and if that meant an engagement became inevitable, they would have to fight.

The British army evacuate Philadelphia and march through the Jerseys.

On the morning of the 18th, Philadelphia was evacuated;[6] and, by two in the afternoon, all the British troops were encamped on the Jersey shore, from Cooper's Creek to Red Bank. Although they availed themselves to a great extent of the transportation by water, yet their line of march was so lengthened and encumbered by baggage, and the weather was so intensely hot, that they were under the necessity of proceeding slowly. Indeed their movements wore the appearance of purposed delay; and were calculated to favour the opinion that Sir Henry Clinton was willing to be overtaken, and wished for a general engagement.

On the morning of the 18th, Philadelphia was evacuated;[6] and by two in the afternoon, all the British troops were set up on the Jersey shore, from Cooper's Creek to Red Bank. Even though they made good use of transportation by water, their march was really stretched out and weighed down by baggage, and the weather was extremely hot, so they had to move slowly. In fact, their movements seemed intentionally delayed, suggesting that Sir Henry Clinton was open to being caught up with and was looking for a general fight.

As his line of march, until he passed Crosswicks, led directly up the Delaware, General Washington found it necessary to make an extensive circuit, and to cross the river at Coryell's Ferry; after which he kept possession of the high grounds in Jersey, thereby retaining the choice of bringing on, or avoiding an action.[Pg 13]

As General Washington's route continued directly up the Delaware until he reached Crosswicks, he found it necessary to take a longer path and cross the river at Coryell's Ferry. After that, he held the high ground in New Jersey, which allowed him to choose whether to engage in battle or not.[Pg 13]

June 24.

As Sir Henry Clinton encamped at, and about, Allentown, the main body of the American army lay in Hopewell township, about five miles from Princeton, Major General Dickenson, with about one thousand militia, and Maxwell's brigade, hung on Sir Henry Clinton's left flank. General Cadwallader, with Jackson's regiment and a few militia, was in his rear; and Colonel Morgan with a regiment of six hundred men watched his right.

As Sir Henry Clinton set up camp at and around Allentown, the main part of the American army was in Hopewell township, about five miles from Princeton. Major General Dickenson, along with around a thousand militia, and Maxwell's brigade, positioned themselves on Sir Henry Clinton's left flank. General Cadwallader, with Jackson's regiment and a few militia, was behind him, while Colonel Morgan with a regiment of six hundred men kept an eye on his right.

Notwithstanding the almost concurrent opinion of his general officers against risking an action, Washington appears to have been strongly inclined to that measure. He could not be persuaded that, with an army rather superior in point of numbers to his enemy, too much was hazarded by fighting him. Council of war called by General Washington; decide against attacking the enemy on the march.The situation of the two armies was, therefore, once more submitted to the consideration of the general officers, who were asked whether it would be adviseable, of choice, to hazard a general action? And, if it would, whether it should be brought on by an immediate general attack, by a partial attack, or by taking such a position as must compel the enemy to become the assailants?

Despite the nearly unanimous opinion of his senior officers against engaging in battle, Washington seemed strongly inclined to take that risk. He couldn’t be convinced that, with an army that was somewhat larger than his enemy's, too much was at stake by fighting them. General Washington called a council of war; they decided not to attack the enemy while they were on the move. The situation of the two armies was once again presented to the senior officers, who were asked whether it would be wise to risk a major engagement. If so, should it be initiated by an immediate general attack, a partial attack, or by taking a position that would force the enemy to attack?

If the council should be of opinion that it was unadviseable to hazard an engagement, then he asked what measures could be taken with safety to the army, to annoy the enemy in his march, should he proceed through the Jerseys?[Pg 14]

If the council thinks it’s unwise to risk an engagement, then he asked what safe actions could be taken to disturb the enemy during his march if he were to go through the Jerseys?[Pg 14]

The proposition respecting a general action was decidedly negatived. But it was proposed to strengthen the corps on the left flank of the enemy with a reinforcement of fifteen hundred men, and to preserve, with the main body of the army, a relative position which would enable it to act as circumstances might require.

The idea about a general action was clearly dismissed. However, it was suggested to bolster the left flank of the enemy with an extra fifteen hundred soldiers, while keeping the main force of the army in a position that would allow it to respond as needed based on the situation.

In pursuance of this opinion, the troops on the lines were strengthened with a detachment of fifteen hundred select men, commanded by General Scott; and the army moved forward the next day to Kingston.

In line with this decision, the troops on the front lines were reinforced with a detachment of fifteen hundred elite soldiers, led by General Scott; and the army advanced the following day to Kingston.

Though the council had been almost unanimous against a general action, several officers, whose opinions were highly valued, secretly wished for something more than light skirmishing. The opinion of the general against this decision.Knowing this, General Washington, who was still in favour of an engagement, determined to take his measures on his own responsibility. As the British army moved towards Monmouth court-house, he ordered Brigadier General Wayne, with an additional detachment of one thousand select men, to join the advanced corps. June 25.As the continental troops, now constituting the front division, amounted to at least four thousand men, he deemed it proper that they should be commanded by a major general. Lee had a right to claim this tour of duty; but, as he had declared himself openly and strongly against hazarding even a partial engagement, and supposed that nothing further would be at[Pg 15]tempted than merely to reconnoitre the enemy, and restrain plundering parties, he showed no inclination to assert his claim. Unintentionally promoting the private wishes of General Washington, that the command should be given to an officer whose view of the service comported more with his own, Lee yielded this important tour of duty to Lafayette. The orders given to this general were, to proceed immediately with the detachment; and, after forming a junction with General Scott, and taking command of the troops on the lines, to gain the enemy's left flank and rear; give him every practicable annoyance; and attack by detachment, or with his whole force, as the occasion might require.

Though the council was nearly unanimous against taking major action, several officers, whose opinions were highly respected, secretly wanted more than just minor skirmishes. The general is opposed to this decision. Knowing this, General Washington, who still favored an engagement, decided to take matters into his own hands. As the British army advanced toward Monmouth Court House, he ordered Brigadier General Wayne, along with an additional group of one thousand elite troops, to join the front line. June 25th. Since the Continental troops, now making up the front division, numbered at least four thousand, he felt it was appropriate for them to be led by a major general. Lee was entitled to this duty, but since he had openly and strongly opposed risking even a partial engagement, believing that nothing more would be attempted than merely to scout the enemy and prevent looting, he showed no interest in claiming it. Unintentionally aligning with General Washington’s preference for an officer whose outlook matched his own, Lee passed this important duty to Lafayette. The orders given to Lafayette were to proceed immediately with the detachment; after joining General Scott and taking command of the troops on the lines, he was to target the enemy's left flank and rear, create every possible disruption, and attack either in sections or with his entire force, depending on the situation.

These dispositions and orders could scarcely fail to bring on an engagement. Wayne had openly supported that measure; and Lafayette, though against seeking a general action, had been in favour of a partial one. Of consequence, should any proper occasion offer, he would certainly attack with his whole force, which would as certainly produce such a state of things as would render it proper to support him with the whole army.

These plans and orders were bound to lead to a confrontation. Wayne openly backed that approach; and Lafayette, though not in favor of a full-scale battle, supported a smaller engagement. Therefore, if a suitable opportunity arose, he would definitely launch an attack with all his forces, which would likely create a situation that would necessitate providing him with the entire army's support.

June 26.

Immediately after the march of this detachment, General Washington moved to Cranberry, that he might be in readiness to support his front division.

Immediately after this detachment's march, General Washington moved to Cranberry so that he would be ready to support his front division.

The intense heat of the weather; a heavy storm; and a temporary want of provisions, pre[Pg 16]vented the army from continuing its march that day. The advanced corps had pressed forward, and taken a position about five miles in rear of the British army, with the intention of attacking it next morning on its march. Thinking this corps too remote to be supported in case of action, General Washington ordered the Marquis to file off by his left towards Englishtown. These orders were executed early in the morning of the twenty-seventh.

The extreme heat of the weather, a heavy storm, and a temporary shortage of supplies prevented the army from continuing its march that day. The leading corps had moved ahead and taken a position about five miles behind the British army, planning to attack it the next morning as it marched. Concerned that this corps was too far away to be supported in case of a fight, General Washington directed the Marquis to move off to the left towards Englishtown. These orders were carried out early in the morning of the twenty-seventh.

Lafayette had scarcely taken command of the advanced party, when General Lee began to regret having yielded it to him. June 27.He perceived that, in the opinion of all the general officers, great importance was attached to it, and that his reputation was in danger of being impaired by connecting his strenuous opposition to even a partial action, with his declining the command of a very strong detachment, which, it was believed, would engage the rear of the enemy. He therefore solicited earnestly for the command he had before declined.

Lafayette had barely taken command of the advanced party when General Lee started to regret giving it to him. June 27th. He realized that all the other general officers considered it very important, and his reputation was at risk because it seemed like he was strongly opposing even a limited action while also refusing command of a powerful detachment that was thought to be essential for engaging the enemy's rear. So, he earnestly requested the command he had previously turned down.

To relieve the feelings of Lee, without wounding those of Lafayette, General Washington detached him with two additional brigades to Englishtown, to support the Marquis. He would, of course, have the direction of the whole front division, which would now amount to five thousand continental troops; but it was expressly stipulated, that if any enterprise had been already formed by Lafayette, it should be carried[Pg 17] into execution, as if the commanding officer had not been changed. Lee acceded to this condition; and, with two additional brigades, joined the front division of the army, encamped at Englishtown. The rear division also moved forward, and encamped about three miles in his rear. Morgan's corps still hovered on the right flank of the British, and General Dickenson on their left.

To ease Lee's feelings without hurting Lafayette's, General Washington sent him with two extra brigades to Englishtown to support the Marquis. He would, of course, be in charge of the entire front division, which would now number five thousand Continental troops; however, it was clearly stated that if Lafayette had already planned any operations, they should proceed[Pg 17] as if the commanding officer had not changed. Lee agreed to this condition and joined the front division of the army camped at Englishtown with the two additional brigades. The rear division also moved up and camped about three miles behind him. Morgan's corps continued to operate on the right flank of the British, while General Dickenson positioned himself on their left.

Sir Henry Clinton occupied the high grounds about Monmouth court-house, having his right flank in the skirt of a small wood, while his left was secured by a very thick one, and a morass running towards his rear. His whole front was also covered by a wood, and for a considerable distance towards his left, by a morass.

Sir Henry Clinton took position on the high ground near Monmouth courthouse, with his right flank protected by the edge of a small forest, while his left was secured by a very dense woods and a swamp stretching towards his rear. His entire front was also shielded by woods, and for quite a distance on his left, by a swamp.

This position seemed unassailable; and the British were within twelve miles of the high grounds about Middletown, after reaching which they would be perfectly secure.

This position seemed unbeatable; and the British were just twelve miles from the elevated land near Middletown, after reaching which they would be completely safe.

Under these circumstances, General Washington ordered Lee to attack the British rear the moment it should move from its ground.

Under these circumstances, General Washington instructed Lee to strike the British rear as soon as it moved from its position.

June 28.

About five in the morning, intelligence was received from General Dickenson that the front of the enemy was in motion. The troops were immediately put under arms, and Lee was ordered to attack the rear, "unless there should be powerful reasons to the contrary." He was at the same time informed that the rear division would be on its march to support him.[Pg 18]

About five in the morning, General Dickenson reported that the enemy was on the move. The troops were quickly mobilized, and Lee was told to attack the rear, "unless there are strong reasons not to." He was also informed that the rear division would be on its way to support him.[Pg 18]

Sir Henry Clinton had observed the appearances on his flanks and rear on the twenty-seventh; and, conjecturing that the American army was in his neighbourhood, had changed the order of his march. The baggage was placed under the care of General Knyphausen, while the strength and flower of his army, entirely unincumbered, formed the rear division, under the particular command of Lord Cornwallis, who was accompanied by the Commander-in-chief.

Sir Henry Clinton had noticed the activity on his sides and in the back on the twenty-seventh; and, suspecting that the American army was nearby, he altered his marching orders. The baggage was handed over to General Knyphausen, while the main force of his army, completely unburdened, made up the rear division, led specifically by Lord Cornwallis, who was joined by the Commander-in-chief.

To avoid pressing on Knyphausen, Cornwallis remained on his ground until about eight; and then, descending from the heights of Freehold into an extensive plain, took up his line of march in rear of the front division.[7]

To avoid pushing Knyphausen, Cornwallis stayed where he was until around eight; then, moving down from the heights of Freehold into a broad plain, he began his march behind the front division.[7]

General Lee had made dispositions for executing the orders given the preceding evening, and repeated in the morning; and, soon after the British rear had moved from its ground, prepared to attack it. General Dickenson had been directed to detach some of his best troops, to take such a position as to co-operate with him; and Morgan was ordered to act on the right flank.

General Lee had made plans to carry out the orders given the night before and repeated in the morning; and, soon after the British rear had moved from its position, he prepared to attack. General Dickenson was instructed to send some of his best troops to take a position to support him; and Morgan was ordered to operate on the right flank.

Lee appeared on the heights of Freehold soon after Lord Cornwallis had left them; and, following the British into the plain, ordered General Wayne to attack the rear of their covering party with sufficient vigour to check it, but not to press it so closely as either to force it up to the main body, or to draw reinforcements to its[Pg 19] aid. In the mean time, he intended to gain the front of this party by a shorter road, and, intercepting its communication with the line, to bear it off before it could be assisted.

Lee appeared on the heights of Freehold shortly after Lord Cornwallis had left; and, following the British into the plain, he ordered General Wayne to attack the rear of their covering party with enough force to hold it back, but not so aggressively as to push it towards the main body or to bring reinforcements to its[Pg 19] aid. In the meantime, he planned to get in front of this party via a shorter route, intercepting its communication with the line to cut it off before it could receive any assistance.

 

Martha Washington

Martha Washington

Martha Washington

Martha Washington

From the portrait by Gilbert Stuart

From the portrait by Gilbert Stuart

After studying under Benjamin West, the American painter who succeeded Sir Joshua Reynolds as (second) president of the Royal Academy in London, Gilbert Stuart established a studio in Philadelphia where he met and painted the first of his famous portraits of George Washington. This one of Martha Washington, the best known likeness of her in existence, was painted in the city of Washington, where the artist had a studio between 1800 and 1802. She gave him several sittings at Mount Vernon.

After studying with Benjamin West, the American painter who followed Sir Joshua Reynolds as the second president of the Royal Academy in London, Gilbert Stuart opened a studio in Philadelphia where he created his first famous portraits of George Washington. The most recognized portrait of Martha Washington, which is the best likeness of her that exists, was painted in Washington, D.C., where he had a studio from 1800 to 1802. She posed for him multiple times at Mount Vernon.

 

While in the execution of this design, a gentleman in the suite of General Washington came up to gain intelligence; and Lee communicated to him his present object.

While working on this plan, a gentleman in the suite of General Washington approached to gather information; and Lee shared his current goal.

Before he reached the point of destination, there was reason to believe that the British rear was much stronger than had been conjectured. The intelligence on this subject being contradictory, and the face of the country well calculated to conceal the truth, he deemed it adviseable to ascertain the fact himself.

Before he got to his destination, there was reason to believe that the British rear was much stronger than previously thought. The information on this matter was contradictory, and the landscape was well-suited to hide the truth, so he thought it was wise to find out the reality himself.

Sir Henry Clinton, soon after the rear division was in full march, received intelligence that an American column had appeared on his left flank. This being a corps of militia was soon dispersed, and the march was continued. When his rear guard had descended from the heights, he saw it followed by a strong corps, soon after which a cannonade was commenced upon it; and, at the same time, a respectable force showed itself on each of his flanks. Suspecting a design on his baggage, he determined to attack the troops in his rear so vigorously, as to compel a recall of those on his flanks; and, for this purpose, marched back his whole rear division. This movement was in progress as Lee advanced for[Pg 20] the purpose of reconnoitring. He soon perceived his mistake respecting the force of the British rear, but still determined to engage on that ground, although his judgment disapproved the measure; there being a morass immediately in his rear, which would necessarily impede the reinforcements which might be advancing to his aid, and embarrass his retreat should he be finally overpowered.

Sir Henry Clinton, shortly after the rear division was fully on the move, got word that an American group had shown up on his left side. This militia unit was quickly scattered, and the march continued. Once his rear guard had come down from the heights, he noticed it was being followed by a strong force, and soon after, cannon fire started hitting it; at the same time, a significant number of troops appeared on both of his flanks. Suspecting an attempt on his supplies, he decided to launch a strong attack on the troops in his rear to force a retreat of those on his flanks; for this reason, he marched his entire rear division back. This maneuver was happening as Lee advanced for[Pg 20] reconnaissance. He quickly recognized his error about the strength of the British rear, but still chose to engage on that ground, even though his judgment warned against it; there was a marshy area right behind him that would hinder any reinforcements coming to help and complicate his retreat if he ended up being overwhelmed.

This was about ten. While both armies were preparing for action, General Scott (as stated by General Lee) mistook an oblique march of an American column for a retreat; and, in the apprehension of being abandoned, left his position, and repassed the ravine in his rear.

This was around ten o'clock. While both armies were getting ready for battle, General Scott (as General Lee noted) misunderstood a diagonal march of an American unit as a retreat. Fearing that he was being left behind, he abandoned his position and crossed back over the ravine behind him.

Being himself of opinion that the ground was unfavourable, Lee did not correct the error he ascribed to Scott, but ordered the whole detachment to regain the heights. He was closely pressed, and some slight skirmishing ensued without much loss on either side.

Being of the opinion that the ground was unfavorable, Lee did not correct the mistake he attributed to Scott, but ordered the entire detachment to reclaim the heights. He was under intense pressure, and some minor skirmishing took place with little loss on either side.

As soon as the firing announced the commencement of the action, the rear division of the army advanced rapidly to the support of the front. As they approached the scene of action, General Washington, who had received no intelligence from Lee giving notice of his retreat, rode forward, and, to his utter astonishment and mortification, met the advanced corps retiring before the enemy, without having made a single effort to maintain its ground. The troops he[Pg 21] first saw neither understood the motives which had governed General Lee, nor his present design; and could give no other information than that, by his orders, they had fled without fighting.

As soon as the gunfire signaled the start of the action, the rear division of the army quickly moved up to support the front. As they got closer to the battlefield, General Washington, who hadn’t received any word from Lee about his retreat, rode ahead and, to his shock and embarrassment, encountered the forward troops retreating in front of the enemy without having made any attempt to hold their position. The troops he[Pg 21] first met didn't understand the reasons behind General Lee's actions or his current plans and could only relay that, by his orders, they had abandoned their position without a fight.

General Washington rode to the rear of the division, where he met General Lee, to whom he spoke in terms of some warmth, implying disapprobation of his conduct.

General Washington rode to the back of the division, where he met General Lee, and spoke to him with some intensity, suggesting he disapproved of his actions.

Orders were immediately given to Colonel Stewart and Lieutenant Colonel Ramsay to form their regiments for the purpose of checking the pursuit; and General Lee was directed to take proper measures with the residue of his force to stop the British column on that ground. The Commander-in-chief then rode back to arrange the rear division of the army.

Orders were promptly issued to Colonel Stewart and Lieutenant Colonel Ramsay to assemble their regiments to halt the pursuit; General Lee was instructed to take appropriate steps with the remainder of his forces to stop the British column on that ground. The Commander-in-chief then rode back to organize the rear division of the army.

He attacks the enemy at Monmouth Court-house.

These orders were executed with firmness; and, when forced from his ground, Lee brought off his troops in good order, and was directed to form in the rear of Englishtown.

These orders were carried out decisively; and, when he had to retreat from his position, Lee managed to move his troops back in an orderly fashion and was instructed to regroup behind Englishtown.

This check afforded time to draw up the left wing and second line of the American army on an eminence, covered by a morass in front. Lord Stirling, who commanded the left wing, brought up a detachment of artillery under Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, and some field pieces, which played with considerable effect on a division of the British which had passed the morass, and was pressing on to the charge. These pieces,[Pg 22] with the aid of several parties of infantry, effectually stopped the advance of the enemy.

This check allowed time to position the left wing and second line of the American army on a hill, protected by a swamp in front. Lord Stirling, who was in charge of the left wing, brought in a group of artillery led by Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, along with some field guns that had a significant impact on a division of the British that had crossed the swamp and was moving forward to attack. These guns, [Pg 22], along with several infantry units, effectively halted the enemy's advance.

The action severe but not decisive.

Finding themselves warmly opposed in front, the British attempted to turn the left flank of the American army, but were repulsed. They then attempted the right with as little success. General Greene had advanced a body of troops with artillery to a commanding piece of ground in his front, which not only disappointed the design of turning the right, but enfiladed the party which yet remained in front of the left wing. At this moment, General Wayne was advanced with a body of infantry to engage them in front, who kept up so hot and well directed a fire, that they soon withdrew behind the ravine, to the ground on which the action had commenced immediately after the arrival of General Washington.[8]

Facing strong opposition, the British tried to flank the left side of the American army but were pushed back. They then tried the right side with no more success. General Greene had moved troops with artillery to a strategic high ground in front of him, which not only disrupted their plan to outmaneuver the right but also targeted the remaining forces in front of the left wing. Meanwhile, General Wayne advanced with a group of infantry to engage the enemy directly, maintaining such a fierce and accurate fire that the British quickly retreated behind the ravine to the ground where the battle had started after General Washington's arrival.[8]

The position now taken by the British army was very strong. Both flanks were secured by thick woods and morasses; and their front was accessible only through a narrow pass. The day had been intensely hot, and the troops were much fatigued. Notwithstanding these circumstances, General Washington resolved to renew the engagement. For this purpose he ordered[Pg 23] Brigadier General Poor, with his own and the North Carolina brigade, to gain their right flank, while Woodford with his brigade should turn their left. At the same time the artillery was ordered to advance, and play on their front. These orders were obeyed with alacrity; but the impediments on the flanks of the British were so considerable that, before they could be overcome, it was nearly dark. Farther operations were therefore deferred until next morning; and the brigades which had been detached to the flanks of the British army continued on their ground through the night, and the other troops lay on the field of battle with their arms in their hands. General Washington passed the night in his cloak in the midst of his soldiers.

The position now held by the British army was very strong. Both flanks were protected by thick woods and swamps, and their front could only be approached through a narrow pass. It had been an extremely hot day, and the troops were quite tired. Despite these conditions, General Washington decided to continue the fight. He ordered[Pg 23] Brigadier General Poor, along with his own brigade and the North Carolina brigade, to attack their right flank, while Woodford with his brigade would flank their left. At the same time, the artillery was instructed to move forward and target their front. These orders were carried out eagerly, but the obstacles on the British flanks were so significant that, before they could be cleared, it was almost dark. Further actions were therefore postponed until the next morning; the brigades assigned to the British army's flanks remained in their positions throughout the night, and the other troops stayed on the battlefield with their weapons in hand. General Washington spent the night in his cloak among his soldiers.

The British employed the early part of the night in removing their wounded; and, about midnight, marched away in such silence that their retreat was not perceived until day.

The British spent the early part of the night taking care of their wounded, and around midnight, they left in such silence that no one noticed their retreat until morning.

As it was certain that they must gain the high grounds about Middletown before they could be overtaken; as the face of the country afforded no prospect of opposing their embarkation; and as the battle already fought had terminated in a manner to make a general impression favourable to the American arms; it was thought proper to relinquish the pursuit, leaving a detachment to hover about the British rear, the main body of the army moved towards the Hudson.[Pg 24]

Since it was clear that they needed to take the high ground around Middletown before they could be caught, and since the terrain didn’t offer any chance to stop their departure, and because the battle that had just taken place ended in a way that created a positive impression for the American forces, it was decided to call off the chase. A small group was left to keep an eye on the British rear while the main part of the army moved toward the Hudson.[Pg 24]

The Commander-in-chief was highly gratified with the conduct of his troops in this action. Their behaviour, he said, after recovering from the first surprise occasioned by the unexpected retreat of the advanced corps, could not be surpassed. General Wayne was particularly mentioned; and the artillery were spoken of in terms of high praise.

The Commander-in-chief was very pleased with how his troops performed in this battle. He noted that their behavior, after getting over the initial shock of the sudden retreat of the forward units, was exceptional. General Wayne received special mention, and the artillery was also praised highly.

The loss of the Americans in the battle of Monmouth was eight officers and sixty-one privates killed, and about one hundred and sixty wounded. Among the slain were Lieutenant Colonel Bonner of Pennsylvania, and Major Dickenson of Virginia, both of whom were much regretted. One hundred and thirty were missing; but a considerable number of these afterwards rejoined their regiments.

The loss of the Americans in the Battle of Monmouth was eight officers and sixty-one privates killed, and about one hundred and sixty wounded. Among the dead were Lieutenant Colonel Bonner from Pennsylvania and Major Dickenson from Virginia, both of whom were greatly missed. One hundred and thirty were missing, but a significant number of them later rejoined their regiments.

In his official letter, Sir Henry Clinton states his dead and missing at four officers, and one hundred and eighty-four privates. His wounded at sixteen officers and one hundred and fifty-four privates. This account, so far as respects the dead, can not be correct, as four officers and two hundred and forty-five privates were buried on the field by persons appointed for the purpose, who made their report to the Commander-in-chief; and some few were afterwards found, so as to increase the number to nearly three hundred. The uncommon heat of the day proved fatal to several on both sides.[Pg 25]

In his official letter, Sir Henry Clinton reports that four officers and one hundred eighty-four privates are dead or missing. He states that sixteen officers and one hundred fifty-four privates are wounded. This report about the dead can't be accurate, as four officers and two hundred forty-five privates were buried on the field by individuals assigned for this task, who then reported back to the Commander-in-chief; a few more were found later, raising the total to nearly three hundred. The unusually high temperatures that day were deadly for several on both sides.[Pg 25]

As usual, when a battle has not been decisive, both parties claimed the victory. In the early part of the day, the advantage was certainly with the British; in the latter part, it may be pronounced with equal certainty to have been with the Americans. They maintained their ground, repulsed the enemy, were prevented only by the night, and by the retreat of the hostile army from renewing the action, and suffered less in killed and wounded than their adversaries.

As is typical, when a battle isn’t clear-cut, both sides claimed victory. In the early part of the day, the British definitely had the upper hand; in the later part, it can be just as confidently said that the Americans did. They held their position, pushed back the enemy, and were only stopped from continuing the fight by nightfall and the retreat of the opposing army, suffering fewer casualties than their opponents.

It is true that Sir Henry Clinton effected what he states to have been his principal object,—the safety of his baggage. But when it is recollected that the American officers had decided against hazarding an action, that this advice must have trammeled the conduct, and circumscribed the views of the Commander-in-chief, he will be admitted to have effected no inconsiderable object in giving the American arms that appearance of superiority which was certainly acquired by this engagement.

It’s true that Sir Henry Clinton achieved what he claims was his main goal—the safety of his supplies. However, considering that the American officers had chosen not to risk a battle, and that this decision likely restricted the actions and strategies of the Commander-in-chief, it can be acknowledged that he did manage to achieve a significant goal by giving the American forces an impression of superiority, which was definitely gained through this encounter.

Independent of the loss sustained in the action, the British army was considerably weakened in its march from Philadelphia to New York. About one hundred prisoners were made, and near one thousand soldiers, chiefly foreigners, deserted while passing through Jersey.

Independent of the losses suffered in the battle, the British army was significantly weakened during its march from Philadelphia to New York. About one hundred prisoners were taken, and nearly one thousand soldiers, mostly foreigners, deserted while crossing through Jersey.

The conduct of Lee was generally disapproved. As however he had possessed a large share of the confidence and good opinion of the[Pg 26] Commander-in-chief, it is probable that explanations might have been made which would have rescued him from the imputations that were cast on him, and have restored him to the esteem of the army, could his haughty temper have brooked the indignity he believed to have been offered him on the field of battle. General Washington had taken no measures in consequence of the events of that day, and would probably have come to no resolution concerning them without an amicable explanation, when he received from Lee a letter expressed in very unbecoming terms, in which he, in the tone of a superior, required reparation for the injury sustained "from the very singular expressions" said to have been used on the day of the action by the Commander-in-chief.

The way Lee acted was generally frowned upon. However, since he had a lot of trust and respect from the Commander-in-chief, it's likely that explanations could have been given that would clear his name and restore his reputation in the army, if his pride could have handled what he perceived as an insult on the battlefield. General Washington hadn't taken any action following the events of that day and probably wouldn't have made any decisions without a friendly discussion, when he received a letter from Lee that was quite inappropriate. In it, he somewhat arrogantly demanded compensation for the offense he claimed to have suffered from the "very singular expressions" said to have been used by the Commander-in-chief on the day of the battle.

June 30.

This letter was answered by an assurance that, so soon as circumstances would admit of an inquiry, he should have an opportunity of justifying himself, to the army, to America, and to the world in general; or of convincing them that he had been guilty of disobedience of orders, and misbehaviour before the enemy. General Lee arrested for his behavior in this action, and afterwards to the commander-in-chief. On his expressing a wish for a speedy investigation of his conduct, and for a court-martial rather than a court of inquiry, he was arrested.

This letter was replied to with a promise that as soon as circumstances allowed for an investigation, he would have the chance to clear his name in front of the army, America, and the world in general; or to prove that he had been disobedient to orders and behaved poorly in front of the enemy. General Lee was arrested for his actions in this situation and later reported to the commander-in-chief. When he expressed a desire for a swift review of his conduct and preferred a court-martial over a court of inquiry, he was arrested.

First. For disobedience of orders in not attacking the enemy on the 28th of June, agreeably to repeated instructions.[Pg 27]

First. For ignoring orders by not attacking the enemy on June 28th, despite repeated instructions.[Pg 27]

Secondly. For misbehaviour before the enemy on the same day, in making an unnecessary, disorderly, and shameful retreat.

Secondly. For misconduct in front of the enemy on that same day, by making an unnecessary, chaotic, and disgraceful retreat.

Thirdly. For disrespect to the Commander-in-chief in two letters.

Thirdly. For disrespect shown to the Commander-in-Chief in two letters.

Before this correspondence had taken place, strong and specific charges of misconduct had been made against General Lee by several officers of his detachment, and particularly by Generals Wayne and Scott. In these, the transactions of the day, not being well understood, were represented in colours much more unfavourable to Lee, than facts, when properly explained, would seem to justify. These representations, most probably, induced the strong language of the second article in the charge. Court-martial appointed to try him. Sentenced to be suspended for one year. A court-martial, over which Lord Stirling presided, after a tedious investigation, found him guilty of all the charges exhibited against him, and sentenced him to be suspended for one year. This sentence was, afterwards, though with some hesitation, approved, almost unanimously, by congress. The court softened, in some degree, the severity of the second charge, by finding him guilty, not in its very words, but "of misbehaviour before the enemy, by making an unnecessary, and, in some few instances, a disorderly retreat."

Before this correspondence happened, several officers from his detachment, especially Generals Wayne and Scott, had made serious and specific accusations of misconduct against General Lee. At the time, the events of the day weren't well understood and were portrayed in a way that was much more negative toward Lee than the actual facts would support when properly clarified. These portrayals likely influenced the strong wording of the second article in the charge. He was appointed for a court-martial to face trial and was sentenced to a one-year suspension. A court-martial, led by Lord Stirling, after a lengthy investigation, found him guilty of all the charges brought against him and sentenced him to a one-year suspension. This sentence was later, though with some reluctance, almost unanimously approved by Congress. The court somewhat mitigated the harshness of the second charge by finding him guilty not in its exact wording, but "of misbehavior before the enemy, by making an unnecessary and, in some cases, a disorganized retreat."

Lee defended himself with his accustomed ability. He proved that, after the retreat had[Pg 28] commenced, in consequence of General Scott's repassing the ravine, on the approach of the enemy, he had designed to form on the first advantageous piece of ground he could find; and that, in his own opinion, and in the opinion of some other officers, no safe and advantageous position had presented itself until he met General Washington; at which time it was his intention to fight the enemy on the very ground afterwards taken by that officer. He suggested a variety of reasons in justification of his retreat, which, if they do not absolutely establish its propriety, give it so questionable a form as to render it probable that a public examination never would have taken place, could his proud spirit have stooped to offer explanation instead of outrage, to the Commander-in-chief.

Lee defended himself with his usual skill. He demonstrated that, after the retreat had[Pg 28] started due to General Scott crossing back over the ravine as the enemy approached, he planned to regroup on the first suitable piece of land he found. He believed, along with some other officers, that no safe and advantageous position had appeared until he met General Washington; at that point, he intended to engage the enemy on the very ground that General Washington later occupied. He provided several reasons to justify his retreat, which, while they may not completely prove its correctness, made it unclear enough that a public inquiry likely would not have occurred if his pride had allowed him to offer an explanation instead of defiance to the Commander-in-chief.

His suspension gave general satisfaction through the army. Without being masters of his conduct as a military man, they perfectly understood the insult offered to their general by his letters; and, whether rightly or not, believed his object to have been to disgrace Washington, and to obtain the supreme command for himself. So devotedly were all ranks attached to their general, that the mere suspicion of such a design, would have rendered his continuance in the army extremely difficult.

His suspension was generally welcomed by the army. Although they weren't in control of his behavior as a military leader, they clearly recognized the disrespect shown to their general through his letters; and, whether it was accurate or not, they thought his goal had been to undermine Washington and take over the top command for himself. Everyone in the ranks was so loyal to their general that just the hint of such a scheme would have made it very hard for him to remain in the army.

Whatever judgment may be formed on the propriety of his retreat, it is not easy to justify,[Pg 29] either the omission to keep the Commander-in-chief continually informed of his situation and intentions, or the very rude letters written after the action was over.

Whatever judgment may be made about the appropriateness of his retreat, it's not easy to defend,[Pg 29] either the failure to keep the Commander-in-chief consistently updated on his situation and plans, or the very harsh letters written after the battle was finished.

The thanks of congress presented to General Washington and his army for their conduct in the battle at Monmouth.
July 5.

The battle of Monmouth gave great satisfaction to congress. A resolution was passed unanimously, thanking General Washington for the activity with which he marched from the camp at Valley Forge, in pursuit of the enemy; for his distinguished exertions in forming the line of battle, and for his great good conduct in the action; and he was requested to signify the thanks of congress to the officers and men under his command, who distinguished themselves by their conduct and valour in the battle.

The Battle of Monmouth greatly pleased Congress. A resolution was passed unanimously, thanking General Washington for his quick march from the camp at Valley Forge in pursuit of the enemy; for his outstanding efforts in forming the battle line; and for his excellent leadership during the action. He was also asked to extend Congress's thanks to the officers and men under his command who distinguished themselves through their actions and bravery in the battle.

After remaining a few days on the high grounds of Middletown, Sir Henry Clinton proceeded to Sandy Hook, whence his army passed over to New York.

After staying for a few days in the highlands of Middletown, Sir Henry Clinton moved on to Sandy Hook, where his army crossed over to New York.


CHAPTER II.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet.... Meditates an attack on the British fleet in New York harbour.... Relinquishes it.... Sails to Rhode Island.... Lord Howe appears off Rhode Island.... Both fleets dispersed by a storm.... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport.... D'Estaing returns.... Sails for Boston.... Sullivan expresses his dissatisfaction in general orders.... Raises the siege of Newport.... Action on Rhode Island.... The Americans retreat to the Continent.... Count D'Estaing expresses his dissatisfaction with Sullivan in a letter to congress.... General Washington labours successfully to heal these discontents.... Lord Howe resigns the command of the British fleet.... Colonel Baylor's regiment surprised.... Captain Donop defeated by Colonel Butler.... Expedition of the British against Egg Harbour.... Pulaski surprised.

Count D'Estaing arrives with a French fleet.... Plans an attack on the British fleet in New York harbor.... Decides against it.... Sails to Rhode Island.... Lord Howe shows up off Rhode Island.... Both fleets are scattered by a storm.... General Sullivan lays siege to Newport.... D'Estaing returns.... Heads to Boston.... Sullivan voices his frustration in general orders.... Lifts the siege of Newport.... Action in Rhode Island.... The Americans fall back to the Continent.... Count D'Estaing shares his disappointment with Sullivan in a letter to Congress.... General Washington works hard to resolve these conflicts.... Lord Howe steps down from command of the British fleet.... Colonel Baylor's regiment is caught off guard.... Captain Donop is defeated by Colonel Butler.... British expedition against Egg Harbor.... Pulaski is taken by surprise.

 

1778 July.

Before General Washington could reach the ground he designed to occupy, intelligence was received that a powerful French fleet, under the command of the Count D'Estaing, had appeared off Chingoteague inlet, the northern extremity of the coast of Virginia.

Before General Washington could get to the area he planned to occupy, he received word that a strong French fleet, led by Count D'Estaing, had appeared off Chingoteague inlet, the northernmost part of the Virginia coast.

Count D'Estaing arrives on the coast of Virginia with a French fleet under his command.
He meditates an attack on the British fleet at New York, but is obliged to relinquish it.
The Count had sailed from Toulon on the 13th of April, with twelve ships of the line and six frigates, having on board a respectable body of land forces. His destination was the Delaware; and he hoped to find the British fleet in that river, and their army in Philadelphia. An uncommon continuance of adverse winds, protracted his voyage across the Atlantic to the extraordinary length of eighty-seven days. This[Pg 31] unusual circumstance saved the British fleet and army.

Count D'Estaing arrives on the coast of Virginia with a French fleet he commands.
He intends to attack the British fleet in New York, but has to call it off.
The Count sailed from Toulon on April 13th, with twelve ships of the line and six frigates, carrying a solid number of ground troops. His goal was the Delaware; he hoped to find the British fleet in that river and their army in Philadelphia. An unusually long spell of bad winds delayed his journey across the Atlantic to an incredible eighty-seven days. This[Pg 31] strange situation saved the British fleet and army.

On reaching the capes of the Delaware, the Count announced his arrival to congress; and, having failed in accomplishing his first object, proceeded along the coast to New York, in the hope of being able to attack the British fleet in the harbour of that place.

On reaching the capes of Delaware, the Count announced his arrival to Congress; and after failing to achieve his initial goal, he continued along the coast to New York, hoping to be able to attack the British fleet in the harbor there.

Sir Henry Clinton was again indebted to some fortunate incidents for his safety.

Sir Henry Clinton was once again saved by some lucky coincidences.

The violent storms of the preceding winter had broken through the narrow isthmus by which Sandy Hook was connected with the continent, and had converted the peninsula into an island. This rendered it necessary for the army to pass from the main to the Hook on a bridge of boats, which would have been impracticable, if obstructed by a superior fleet. It was effected the very day on which D'Estaing appeared off Chingoteague inlet.

The violent storms from the previous winter had washed away the narrow strip of land connecting Sandy Hook to the mainland, turning the peninsula into an island. This made it essential for the army to cross from the mainland to the Hook using a makeshift bridge of boats, which would have been impossible if a larger fleet had been in the way. This crossing happened on the very day that D'Estaing showed up off Chingoteague inlet.

July 13.At Paramus, in Jersey, General Washington received a letter from the president of congress, advising him of this important event, and requesting that he would concert measures with the Count for conjoint and offensive operations.

July 13th. In Paramus, New Jersey, General Washington got a letter from the president of Congress, informing him of this significant event and asking him to coordinate plans with the Count for joint offensive actions.

The next day he received a second letter on the same subject, enclosing two resolutions, one directing him to co-operate with the French admiral, and the other authorizing him to call on the states from New Hampshire to New Jersey[Pg 32] inclusive, for such aids of militia as he might deem necessary for the operations of the allied arms.

The next day, he got another letter on the same topic, including two resolutions. One instructed him to work together with the French admiral, and the other gave him permission to reach out to the states from New Hampshire to New Jersey[Pg 32] inclusive, for any militia support he thought was necessary for the operations of the allied forces.

He determined to proceed immediately to the White Plains, whence the army might co-operate with more facility in the execution of any attempt which might be made by the fleet, and despatched Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, one of his aids de camp, with all the information relative to the enemy, as well as to his own army, which might be useful to D'Estaing. Lieutenant Colonel Laurens was authorized to consult on future conjoint operations, and to establish conventional signals for the purpose of facilitating the communication of intelligence.

He decided to head straight to White Plains, where the army could work together more easily with any actions taken by the fleet. He sent Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, one of his aides, with all the information about the enemy and his own army that could be helpful to D'Estaing. Lieutenant Colonel Laurens was given the authority to discuss future joint operations and to set up signal systems to make communication of intelligence easier.

The French admiral, on arriving off the Hook, despatched Major de Choisi, a gentleman of his family, to General Washington, for the purpose of communicating fully his views and his strength. His first object was to attack New York. If this should be found impracticable, he was desirous of turning his attention to Rhode Island. To assist in coming to a result on these enterprises, General Washington despatched Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton with such farther communications as had been suggested, by inquiries made since the departure of Lieutenant Colonel Laurens.

The French admiral, upon arriving at the Hook, sent Major de Choisi, a family associate, to General Washington to fully share his thoughts and his resources. His primary goal was to launch an attack on New York. If that proved impossible, he wanted to shift his focus to Rhode Island. To help determine the best course of action for these plans, General Washington sent Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton with additional information based on questions raised since Lieutenant Colonel Laurens left.

Fearing that the water on the bar at the entrance of the harbour was not of sufficient depth to admit the passage of the largest ships of the[Pg 33] French fleet without much difficulty and danger, General Washington had turned his attention to other objects which might be, eventually, pursued. General Sullivan, who commanded the troops in Rhode Island, was directed to prepare for an enterprise against Newport; and the Marquis de Lafayette was detached with two brigades to join him at Providence. July 21.The next day Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton returned to camp with the final determination of the Count D'Estaing to relinquish the meditated attack on the fleet in the harbour of New York, in consequence of the impracticability of passing the bar.

Fearing that the water on the bar at the entrance of the harbor wasn't deep enough for the largest ships of the[Pg 33] French fleet to pass through without significant difficulty and danger, General Washington focused on other possibilities that might be taken up later. General Sullivan, who was in charge of the troops in Rhode Island, was instructed to prepare for an operation against Newport; and the Marquis de Lafayette was sent with two brigades to join him in Providence. July 21st. The next day, Lieutenant Colonel Hamilton returned to camp with the final decision of Count D'Estaing to cancel the planned attack on the fleet in New York Harbor due to the infeasibility of crossing the bar.

General Greene was immediately ordered to Rhode Island, of which state he was a native; and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens was directed to attach himself to the French admiral, and to facilitate all his views by procuring whatever might give them effect; after which he was to act with the army under Sullivan.

General Greene was quickly assigned to Rhode Island, where he was born; and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens was instructed to work with the French admiral, helping him achieve his goals by obtaining whatever resources were needed; after that, he was to join the army under Sullivan.

Sails out to Rhode Island and arrives off Newport.

The resolution being taken to proceed against Rhode Island, the fleet got under way, and, on the 25th of July, appeared off Newport, and cast anchor about five miles from that place, just without Brenton's ledge; soon after which, General Sullivan went on board the Admiral, and concerted with him a plan of operations for the allied forces. The fleet was to enter the harbour, and land the troops of his Christian Majesty on the west side of the island, a little to the[Pg 34] north of Dyer's island. The Americans were to land at the same time on the opposite coast, under cover of the guns of a frigate.

The decision to take action against Rhode Island was made, and the fleet set sail. On July 25th, it arrived off Newport and dropped anchor about five miles from the location, just outside Brenton's ledge. Shortly after, General Sullivan boarded the Admiral's ship to discuss a plan of operations for the allied forces. The fleet was to enter the harbor and land the troops of his Christian Majesty on the west side of the island, slightly north of Dyer's island. The Americans were to land simultaneously on the opposite coast, protected by the firepower of a frigate.

Although the appearance of the French fleet had animated the whole country, and had produced a considerable degree of alacrity for the service; although the success of the enterprise essentially depended on maintaining a superiority at sea, which there was much reason to apprehend would soon be wrested from them; yet such are the delays inseparable from measures to bring husbandmen into the field as soldiers, that the operations against Newport were suspended for several days on this account.

Although the arrival of the French fleet had energized the entire country and sparked a strong willingness to serve, and despite the fact that the success of the mission relied heavily on keeping a naval advantage—which there were many reasons to fear would soon be taken away from them—there were unavoidable delays in getting farmers to serve as soldiers, which caused the operations against Newport to be paused for several days.

As the militia of New Hampshire and Massachusetts approached, General Sullivan joined General Greene at Tiverton, and it was agreed with the Admiral that the fleet should enter the main channel immediately, and that the descent should be made the succeeding day. August 8.The ships of war passed the British batteries and entered the harbour, without receiving or doing any considerable damage.

As the militias from New Hampshire and Massachusetts got closer, General Sullivan met up with General Greene in Tiverton. They reached an agreement with the Admiral for the fleet to enter the main channel right away, and the plan was to launch the attack the next day. August 8th. The warships went past the British defenses and into the harbor, causing and taking no significant damage.

The militia not arriving precisely at the time they were expected, General Sullivan could not hazard the movement which had been concerted, and stated to the Count the necessity of postponing it till the next day. Meanwhile, the preparations for the descent being perceived, General Pigot drew the troops which had been[Pg 35] stationed on the north end of the island into the lines at Newport.

The militia didn't arrive exactly when they were expected, so General Sullivan couldn't risk going forward with the planned movement and informed the Count that it needed to be postponed until the next day. In the meantime, as the preparations for the descent became evident, General Pigot pulled the troops that had been[Pg 35] stationed at the north end of the island into the lines at Newport.

On discovering this circumstance the next morning, Sullivan determined to avail himself of it, and to take immediate possession of the works which had been abandoned. August 9.The whole army crossed the east passage, and landed on the north end of Rhode Island. This movement gave great offence to the Admiral, who resented the indelicacy supposed to have been committed by Sullivan in landing before the French, and without consulting him.

On discovering this situation the next morning, Sullivan decided to take advantage of it and immediately take control of the abandoned works. August 9th. The entire army crossed the eastern passage and landed at the northern end of Rhode Island. This action greatly upset the Admiral, who was offended by what he believed was Sullivan's lack of propriety in landing before the French and without consulting him.

Unfortunately, some difficulties, on subjects of mere punctilio, had previously arisen. The Count D'Estaing was a land as well as sea officer; and held the high rank of lieutenant general in the service of France. Sullivan being only a major general, some misunderstanding on this delicate point had been apprehended; and General Washington had suggested to him the necessity of taking every precaution to avoid it. This, it was supposed, had been effected in their first conference, in which it was agreed that the Americans should land first, after which the French should land, to be commanded by the Count D'Estaing in person. The motives for this arrangement are not stated; but it was most probably made solely with a view to the success of the enterprise. Either his own after-reflections or the suggestions of others dissatisfied the Count with it, and he insisted that the descent[Pg 36] should be made on both sides of the island precisely at the same instant, and that one wing of the American army should be attached to the French, and land with them. He also declined commanding in person, and wished the Marquis de Lafayette to take charge of the French troops as well as of the Americans attached to them.

Unfortunately, some minor issues related to protocol had come up earlier. Count D'Estaing was both a land and sea officer, holding the high rank of lieutenant general in the French service. Since Sullivan was only a major general, there was concern about a potential misunderstanding on this sensitive topic, and General Washington had advised him to take every precaution to prevent it. It was believed that this was addressed during their initial meeting, where they agreed that the Americans would land first, followed by the French, who would be commanded by Count D'Estaing himself. The reasons for this arrangement aren’t specified, but it was likely made solely to ensure the mission's success. Either upon further reflection or after hearing others’ opinions, the Count became dissatisfied with this plan and insisted that the landing should happen simultaneously on both sides of the island, and that one wing of the American army should join the French forces and land with them. He also refused to lead in person and wanted the Marquis de Lafayette to command both the French troops and the Americans assigned to them.

It being feared that this alteration of the plan might endanger both its parts, D'Estaing was prevailed on to reduce his demand from one wing of the American army to one thousand militia. When, afterwards, General Sullivan crossed over into the island before the time to which he had himself postponed the descent, and without giving previous notice to the Count of this movement, some suspicions seem to have been excited, that the measure was taken with other views than were avowed, and no inconsiderable degree of excitement was manifested. The Count refused to answer Sullivan's letter, and charged Lieutenant Colonel Fleury, who delivered it, with being more an American than a Frenchman.

Fearing that changing the plan could jeopardize both parts of it, D'Estaing agreed to lower his request from one wing of the American army to one thousand militia. Later, when General Sullivan crossed over to the island earlier than he had postponed the mission and without notifying the Count in advance, it raised some suspicions that this move had ulterior motives, and there was a significant amount of unrest. The Count refused to respond to Sullivan's letter and accused Lieutenant Colonel Fleury, who delivered it, of being more American than French.

At this time a British fleet appeared, which, after sailing close into the land, and communicating with General Pigot, withdrew some distance, and came to anchor off point Judith, just without the narrow inlet leading into the harbour.

At this time, a British fleet showed up, which, after sailing close to the shore and talking with General Pigot, pulled back a bit and anchored off Point Judith, just outside the narrow inlet that leads into the harbor.

After it had been ascertained that the destination of the Count D'Estaing was America, he[Pg 37] was followed by a squadron of twelve ships of the line under Admiral Byron, who was designed to relieve Lord Howe, that nobleman having solicited his recall. The vessels composing this squadron meeting with weather unusually bad for the season, and being separated in different storms, arrived, after lingering through a tedious passage, in various degrees of distress, on different and remote parts of the American coast. Between the departure of D'Estaing from the Hook on the 23d of July, and the 30th of that month, four ships of sixty-four and fifty guns arrived at Sandy Hook.

After it was confirmed that Count D'Estaing was headed to America, he[Pg 37] was followed by a squadron of twelve ships led by Admiral Byron, who was sent to replace Lord Howe, as Lord Howe had requested to be relieved. The ships in this squadron encountered unusually bad weather for the season, and were scattered by different storms, arriving after a long and challenging journey, in various states of distress, at different and distant parts of the American coast. Between D'Estaing's departure from the Hook on July 23 and July 30, four ships with sixty-four and fifty guns arrived at Sandy Hook.

This addition to the British fleet, though it left Lord Howe considerably inferior to the Count D'Estaing, determined him to attempt the relief of Newport. He sailed from New York on the 6th of August; and, on the 9th, appeared in sight of the French fleet, before intelligence of his departure could be received by the Admiral.

This addition to the British fleet, even though it left Lord Howe significantly outmatched by Count D'Estaing, motivated him to try to help Newport. He set sail from New York on August 6th, and by the 9th, he was in sight of the French fleet, before the Admiral could receive news of his departure.

Sails to attack Lord Howe, who appears off Rhode Island.
August 10.

At the time of his arrival the wind set directly into the harbour, so that it was impossible to get out of it; but it shifted suddenly to the north-east the next morning, and the Count determined to stand out to sea, and give battle. Previous to leaving port, he informed General Sullivan that, on his return, he would land his men as that officer should advise.

At the time he arrived, the wind was blowing straight into the harbor, making it impossible to leave. However, it suddenly changed to the northeast the next morning, and the Count decided to head out to sea and engage in battle. Before departing, he informed General Sullivan that when he returned, he would land his troops based on that officer's advice.

Not choosing to give the advantage of the weather-gage, Lord Howe also weighed anchor[Pg 38] and stood out to sea. He was followed by D'Estaing; and both fleets were soon out of sight.

Not wanting to lose the advantage of the wind, Lord Howe also weighed anchor[Pg 38] and set out to sea. He was followed by D'Estaing, and soon both fleets disappeared from view.

The militia were now arrived; and Sullivan's army amounted to ten thousand men. Some objections were made by Lafayette to his commencing operations before the return of D'Estaing. That officer advised that the army should be advanced to a position in the neighbourhood of Newport, but should not break ground until the Count should be in readiness to act in concert with them. It was extremely desirable to avoid whatever might give offence to the great ally on whose assistance so much depended; but time was deemed of such importance to an army which could not be kept long together, that this advice was overruled, and it was determined to commence the siege immediately.

The militia had now arrived, and Sullivan's army totaled ten thousand men. Lafayette raised some concerns about starting operations before D'Estaing returned. That officer recommended that the army advance to a position near Newport but not start any work until the Count was ready to work alongside them. It was very important to avoid anything that could upset the great ally on whose support they depended so much. However, time was considered crucial for an army that couldn't stay assembled for long, so this advice was set aside, and it was decided to begin the siege right away.

August 12.

Before this determination could be executed, a furious storm blew down all the tents, rendered the arms unfit for immediate use, and greatly damaged the ammunition, of which fifty rounds had just been delivered to each man. The soldiers, having no shelter, suffered extremely; and several perished in the storm, which continued three days. Fifteenth.
General Sullivan lays siege to Newport.
On the return of fair weather the siege was commenced, and continued without any material circumstance for several days.

Before this decision could be carried out, a fierce storm knocked down all the tents, made the weapons unusable right away, and severely damaged the ammunition, of which fifty rounds had just been given to each soldier. The soldiers, with no shelter, suffered greatly; and several died in the storm, which lasted three days. Fifteenth.
General Sullivan is laying siege to Newport.
When the weather cleared, the siege began and went on without any significant events for several days.

As no intelligence had been received from the Admiral, the situation of the American army was[Pg 39] becoming very critical. On the evening of the 19th, their anxieties were relieved for a moment by the reappearance of the French fleet.

As no updates had come in from the Admiral, the situation of the American army was[Pg 39] becoming really critical. On the evening of the 19th, they were temporarily relieved by the return of the French fleet.

The two Admirals, desirous the one of gaining, and the other of retaining the advantage of the wind, had employed two days in manœuvring, without coming to action. Both fleets dispersed by a storm.Towards the close of the second, they were on the point of engaging, when they were separated by the violent storm which had been felt so severely on shore, and which dispersed both fleets. Some single vessels afterwards fell in with each other, but no important capture was made; and both fleets retired in a very shattered condition, the one to the harbour of New York, and the other to that of Newport.

The two Admirals, one eager to gain and the other to keep the advantage of the wind, spent two days maneuvering without engaging in battle. Both fleets were dispersed by a storm. Toward the end of the second day, they were about to clash when a violent storm, which had already caused havoc onshore, separated them and scattered both fleets. Some individual ships later encountered each other, but no significant captures were made, and both fleets withdrew in a severely damaged state, one heading to the harbor of New York and the other to Newport.

D'Estaing returns to Newport, and against the solicitations of Sullivan, sails for Boston.

A letter was immediately despatched by D'Estaing to Sullivan, informing him that, in pursuance of orders from the King, and of the advice of all his officers, he had taken the resolution to carry the fleet to Boston. His instructions directed him to sail for Boston should his fleet meet with any disaster, or should a superior British fleet appear on the coast.

A letter was quickly sent by D'Estaing to Sullivan, letting him know that, following orders from the King and based on the advice of all his officers, he decided to bring the fleet to Boston. His instructions were to sail to Boston if his fleet faced any disaster or if a stronger British fleet showed up on the coast.

This communication threw Sullivan and his army into despair. General Greene and the Marquis de Lafayette were directed to wait on the Admiral with a letter from Sullivan remonstrating against this resolution, and to use their utmost endeavors to induce him to change it.[Pg 40]

This message plunged Sullivan and his army into despair. General Greene and the Marquis de Lafayette were instructed to meet with the Admiral and deliver a letter from Sullivan protesting this decision, and to do everything they could to convince him to change it.[Pg 40]

They represented to him the certainty of carrying the garrison if he would co-operate with them only two days, urged the impolicy of exposing the fleet at sea, in its present condition, represented the port of Boston as equally insecure with that of Newport, and added that the expedition had been undertaken on condition that the French fleet and army should co-operate with them; that confiding in this co-operation, they had brought stores into the island to a great amount, and that to abandon the enterprise in the present state of things, would be a reproach and disgrace to their arms. To be deserted at such a critical moment would have a pernicious influence on the minds of the American people, and would furnish their domestic foes, as well as the common enemy, with the means of animadverting severely on their prospects from an alliance with those who could abandon them under circumstances such as the present. They concluded with wishing that the utmost harmony and confidence might subsist between the two nations, and especially between their officers; and entreated the Admiral, if any personal indiscretions had appeared in conducting the expedition, not to permit them to prejudice the common cause.

They assured him that they were sure they could take the garrison if he would just work with them for two days. They pointed out that it wasn’t wise to risk the fleet at sea in its current state, claimed that the port of Boston was just as vulnerable as Newport, and mentioned that the expedition was planned on the condition that the French fleet and army would support them. They had brought a significant amount of supplies to the island based on that trust, and abandoning the mission now would be a disgrace to their forces. Being left alone at such a critical time would negatively impact the American people's perceptions and give their domestic enemies, as well as their common foes, a chance to criticize their chances of success in an alliance with those who could desert them under these circumstances. They ended by expressing the hope that there would be complete harmony and trust between the two nations, especially among their officers, and urged the Admiral not to let any personal mistakes during the expedition affect the overall mission.

Whatever impression these observations may have made on the Count, they could not change the determination he had formed.[Pg 41]

Whatever impact these observations had on the Count, they couldn't change the decision he had made.[Pg 41]

General Greene, in his representation of this conversation, stated that the principal officers on board the fleet were the enemies of D'Estaing. He was properly a land officer, and they were dissatisfied with his appointment in the navy. Determined to thwart his measures, and to prevent, as far as could be justified, his achieving any brilliant exploit, they availed themselves of the letter of his instructions, and unanimously persevered in advising him to relinquish the enterprise, and sail for Boston. He could not venture, with such instructions, to act against their unanimous opinion; and, although personally disposed to re-enter the harbour, declined doing so, and sailed from the island.

General Greene, in his account of this conversation, said that the main officers on the fleet were opposed to D'Estaing. He was primarily a land officer, and they were unhappy with his appointment to the navy. Determined to undermine his plans and to stop him from achieving any significant success, they took advantage of his instructions and collectively advised him to give up the mission and head to Boston. With such instructions, he couldn't go against their unanimous opinion; although he personally wanted to return to the harbor, he decided against it and left the island instead.

On the return of Greene and Lafayette, Sullivan made yet another effort to retain the fleet. He addressed a second letter to the Admiral, pressing him, in any event, to leave his land forces. The bearer of this letter was also charged with a protest signed by all the general officers in Rhode Island except Lafayette, the only effect of which was to irritate D'Estaing, who proceeded, without delay, on his voyage to Boston.

On Greene and Lafayette's return, Sullivan made another attempt to keep the fleet. He sent a second letter to the Admiral, urging him to leave his land forces behind. The person delivering this letter was also given a protest signed by all the general officers in Rhode Island except Lafayette, which only served to annoy D'Estaing, who promptly continued his journey to Boston.

In consequence of the departure of the French fleet, Sullivan raises the siege of Newport.

Thus abandoned by the fleet, Sullivan called a council of general officers, who were in favour of attempting an assault if five thousand volunteers who had seen nine months service could be obtained for the enterprise; but the departure of the fleet had so discouraged the militia, that[Pg 42] this number could not be procured; and, in a few days, the army was reduced by desertion to little more than five thousand men. As the British were estimated at six thousand, it was determined to raise the siege, and retire to the north end of the island, there to fortify, and wait the result of another effort to induce D'Estaing to return.

Thus abandoned by the fleet, Sullivan called a meeting of the general officers, who supported trying an assault if they could gather five thousand volunteers who had completed nine months of service. However, the fleet's departure had so disheartened the militia that[Pg 42] this number could not be achieved; and, within a few days, the army shrank due to desertion to just over five thousand men. Since the British forces were estimated to be six thousand, it was decided to lift the siege and retreat to the northern part of the island to fortify their position and wait for another chance to convince D'Estaing to return.

August 28.

In the night of the 28th, the army retired by two roads leading to the works on the north end of the island, having its rear covered by Colonels Livingston and Laurens, who commanded light parties on each.

In the night of the 28th, the army pulled back through two roads leading to the fortifications at the north end of the island, with its rear protected by Colonels Livingston and Laurens, who were in charge of light units on each road.

August 29.

Early next morning the retreat was discovered by the British, who followed in two columns, and were engaged on each road by Livingston and Laurens, who retreated slowly and kept up the action with skill and spirit until the English were brought into the neighbourhood of the main body of the Americans, drawn up in order of battle on the ground of their encampment. The British formed on Quaker Hill, a very strong piece of ground, something more than a mile in front of the American line.

Early the next morning, the British discovered the retreat and followed in two columns. They encountered Livingston and Laurens on each road, who slowly withdrew while skillfully maintaining the fight until the British got close to the main body of the Americans, who were arranged in battle order at their campsite. The British positioned themselves on Quaker Hill, which was a strong piece of ground, just over a mile in front of the American line.

Sullivan's rear was covered by strong works; and in his front, rather to the right, was a redoubt. In this position, the two armies cannonaded each other for some time, and a succession of skirmishes was kept up in front of both lines until about two in the afternoon, when the British advanced in force, attempted to turn the[Pg 43] right flank, and made demonstrations of an intention to carry the redoubt in front of the right wing. Action between Sullivan and the British army.General Greene, who commanded that wing, advanced to its support, and a sharp engagement was continued for about half an hour, when the British retreated to Quaker Hill. The cannonade was renewed, and kept up intermingled with slight skirmishing until night.

Sullivan's rear was protected by strong fortifications, and in front of him, slightly to the right, was a redoubt. In this position, both armies bombarded each other for a while, and a series of skirmishes occurred in front of both lines until around two in the afternoon, when the British advanced in force, tried to outflank the[Pg 43] right side, and showed intentions to take the redoubt in front of the right wing. Conflict between Sullivan and the British army.General Greene, who was in command of that wing, moved to support it, and a fierce engagement continued for about half an hour, after which the British retreated to Quaker Hill. The cannonade resumed, mixed with minor skirmishes, until nightfall.

According to the return made by General Sullivan, his loss in killed, wounded and missing was two hundred and eleven. That of the British, as stated by General Pigot, amounted to two hundred and sixty.

According to the report by General Sullivan, his total loss in killed, wounded, and missing was two hundred and eleven. The British loss, as noted by General Pigot, was two hundred and sixty.

August 30.

The next day, the cannonade was renewed, but neither army was inclined to attack the other. The British waited for reinforcements, and Sullivan had at length determined to retire from the island.

The next day, the cannon fire started up again, but neither army wanted to attack the other. The British were waiting for reinforcements, and Sullivan had finally decided to pull back from the island.

The Commander-in-chief had observed some movements among the British transports indicating the embarkation of troops, and had suggested to Sullivan the necessity of securing his retreat. A fleet of transports soon put to sea with a large body of troops, of which immediate notice was given to Sullivan in a letter recommending his retreat to the continent. This reinforcement, which consisted of four thousand men, commanded by Sir Henry Clinton in person, was delayed by adverse winds until the letter of General Washington was received, and the resolution to evacuate the island was taken. The[Pg 44] whole army passed over to the continent unobserved by the enemy, and disembarked about Tiverton by two in the morning.

The Commander-in-Chief noticed some activity among the British transports, suggesting to Sullivan that he needed to secure his retreat. Soon, a fleet of transports set sail with a large troop contingent, and Sullivan was informed immediately in a letter advising him to retreat to the mainland. This reinforcement, which had four thousand men led by Sir Henry Clinton himself, was held up by unfavorable winds until General Washington’s letter arrived, prompting the decision to evacuate the island. The[Pg 44] entire army crossed to the continent without being detected by the enemy and landed near Tiverton around two in the morning.

Sullivan retreats with his army to the continent.

Never was retreat more fortunate. Sir Henry Clinton arrived the next day; and the loss of the American army would have been inevitable.

Never was a retreat more fortunate. Sir Henry Clinton arrived the next day, and the loss of the American army would have been unavoidable.

The complete success of this expedition had been confidently anticipated throughout America; and the most brilliant results had been expected from the capture of so important a part of the British army as the garrison of Newport. The chagrin produced by disappointment was proportioned to the exaltation of their hopes. In general orders issued by Sullivan, soon after the departure of D'Estaing, Sullivan, in one of his general orders, makes use of expressions which offend the count.he permitted some expressions to escape him which were understood to impute to the Count D'Estaing, and to the French nation, an indisposition to promote the interests of the United States. These insinuations wounded the feelings of the French officers, and added, in no small degree, to the resentments of the moment. In subsequent orders, the General sought to correct this indiscretion; and alleged that he had been misunderstood by those who supposed him to blame the Admiral, with whose orders he was unacquainted, and of whose conduct he was, consequently, unable to judge. He also stated explicitly the important aids America had received from France, aids of which he ought not to be unmindful under any[Pg 45] disappointment; and which should prevent a too sudden censure of any movement whatever.

The complete success of this expedition had been confidently expected throughout America, and there were high hopes for impressive results from capturing such an important part of the British army as the garrison in Newport. The disappointment felt was proportional to the high hopes held. In general orders issued by Sullivan shortly after D'Estaing's departure, In one of his general orders, Sullivan uses phrases that upset the count. he let slip some comments that were interpreted as suggesting that Count D'Estaing and the French nation were not supportive of the interests of the United States. These remarks hurt the feelings of the French officers and increased the immediate tensions. In later orders, the General tried to amend this mistake, claiming he had been misunderstood by those who thought he was criticizing the Admiral, whose orders he was not privy to and, therefore, could not judge. He also clearly stated the significant support America had received from France, support that he should not overlook in any moment of disappointment, and which should prevent him from jumping to conclusions about any actions taken.

Count D'Estaing expresses to congress his dissatisfaction with General Sullivan.

The Count D'Estaing, on his part, addressed a letter to congress containing a statement of all the movements of his fleet subsequent to its arrival on the coast, in which his chagrin and irritation were but ill concealed.

The Count D'Estaing, for his part, wrote a letter to Congress outlining all the movements of his fleet since it arrived on the coast, in which his frustration and irritation were barely hidden.

In congress, after approving the conduct of Sullivan and his army, an indiscreet proposition was made to inquire into the causes of the failure of the expedition; but this was set aside by the previous question.

In Congress, after endorsing the actions of Sullivan and his army, a reckless suggestion was made to look into why the expedition had failed; however, this was dismissed by a previous question.

In the first moments of vexation and disappointment, General Sullivan had addressed some letters to the governor of Rhode Island, complaining bitterly of being abandoned by the fleet. These despatches were transmitted by the governor to the speaker of the assembly, and were on the point of being submitted publicly to the house, when they were fortunately arrested by General Greene, who had been introduced on the floor, and placed by the side of the chair; and to whom they were shown by the speaker.

In the initial moments of frustration and disappointment, General Sullivan wrote some letters to the governor of Rhode Island, expressing his anger about being deserted by the fleet. The governor shared these letters with the speaker of the assembly, and they were about to be presented publicly to the house when they were fortunately intercepted by General Greene, who had been introduced on the floor and was sitting next to the chair; the speaker showed the letters to him.

The discontent in New England generally, and in Boston particularly, was so great as to inspire fears that the means of repairing the French ships would not be supplied. To guard against the mischief which might result from this temper, as well as for other objects, General Hancock had repaired from camp to Bos[Pg 46]ton, and Lafayette had followed him on a visit to D'Estaing.

The dissatisfaction in New England overall, and in Boston specifically, was so intense that there were concerns about not having the resources to repair the French ships. To prevent any issues that might come from this attitude, as well as for other reasons, General Hancock had traveled from the camp to Bos[Pg 46]ton, and Lafayette had accompanied him to visit D'Estaing.

The consequences to be apprehended from this unavailing manifestation of ill temper, soon induced all reflecting men to exert themselves to control it. General Washington labours to heal these discontents, in which he succeeds.In the commencement of its operation, General Washington, foreseeing the evils with which it was fraught, had laboured to prevent them. He addressed letters to General Sullivan, to General Heath, who commanded at Boston, and to other individuals of influence in New England, urging the necessity of correcting the intemperance of the moment, and of guarding against the interference of passion with the public interest.

The consequences of this pointless display of bad attitude quickly prompted all thoughtful people to work toward controlling it. General Washington takes steps to resolve these issues, and he is successful. At the start of this situation, General Washington, anticipating the problems it could cause, had tried to prevent them. He wrote letters to General Sullivan, General Heath, who was in charge in Boston, and other influential figures in New England, emphasizing the need to manage the current emotional upheaval and to protect the public interest from being clouded by personal feelings.

Soon after the transmission of these letters, he received a resolution of congress, directing him to take every measure in his power to prevent the publication of the protest entered into by the officers of Sullivan's army. In his letter communicating this resolution, he said, "the disagreement between the army under your command and the fleet, has given me very singular uneasiness. The continent at large is concerned in our cordiality, and it should be kept up by all possible means, consistent with our honour and policy. First impressions, you know, are generally longest retained, and will serve to fix, in a great degree, our national character with the French. In our conduct towards them, we should remember that they are a people old in[Pg 47] war, very strict in military etiquette, and apt to take fire when others scarcely seem warm. Permit me to recommend in the most particular manner, the cultivation of harmony and good agreement, and your endeavours to destroy that ill humour which may have found its way among the officers. It is of the utmost importance too, that the soldiers and the people should know nothing of this misunderstanding, or, if it has reached them, that means may be used to stop its progress, and prevent its effects." In a letter to General Greene, after expressing his fears that the seeds of dissension and distrust might be sown between the troops of the two nations, he added, "I depend much on your temper and influence, to conciliate that animosity which, I plainly perceive by a letter from the Marquis, subsists between the American and French officers in our service. This, you may be assured, will extend itself to the Count, and to the officers and men of his whole fleet, should they return to Rhode Island, unless a reconciliation shall have taken place. The Marquis speaks kindly of a letter from you to him on this subject. He will therefore take any advice from you in a friendly way; and, if he can be pacified, the other French gentlemen will, of course, be satisfied; since they look up to him as their head. The Marquis grounds his complaint on a general order of the 24th of August, and upon the[Pg 48] universal clamour that prevailed against the French nation.

Soon after sending these letters, he got a resolution from Congress telling him to do everything he could to stop the publication of the protest filed by the officers of Sullivan's army. In his letter sharing this resolution, he mentioned, "The disagreement between the army under your command and the fleet has caused me some unique concern. The country as a whole is affected by our unity, and we should maintain it by all possible means that align with our honor and strategy. You know that first impressions usually last the longest and will largely shape our national character with the French. In our dealings with them, we should remember that they are a people experienced in war, very strict about military etiquette, and quick to anger when others hardly seem upset. I strongly recommend fostering harmony and good relations, and your efforts to eliminate any bad feelings that may have arisen among the officers. It's also crucial that the soldiers and the public remain unaware of this conflict, or if they have heard about it, that steps are taken to stop it from spreading and affecting things." In a letter to General Greene, after expressing his worries that the seeds of discord and distrust might be planted between the troops of the two nations, he added, "I rely heavily on your temperament and influence to ease the tension that I clearly see in a letter from the Marquis, existing between the American and French officers in our service. This, you can be sure, will affect the Count and the officers and men of his entire fleet if they return to Rhode Island, unless a reconciliation happens first. The Marquis speaks kindly of a letter from you to him about this matter. He will be willing to take any advice from you in a friendly manner; and if he can be appeased, the other French gentlemen will, of course, be satisfied since they look up to him as their leader. The Marquis bases his complaint on a general order from August 24th, and on the widespread complaints against the French nation."

"I beg you will take every measure to keep the protest entered into by the general officers from being made public. Congress, sensible of the ill consequences that will flow from our differences being known to the world, have passed a resolve to that purpose. Upon the whole, my dear sir, you can conceive my meaning,[9] better than I can express it, and I therefore fully depend on your exerting yourself to heal all private animosities between our principal officers and the French, and to prevent all illiberal expressions and reflections that may fall from the army at large."

"I urge you to take every step necessary to keep the protest made by the general officers from going public. Congress, aware of the negative consequences that will arise from our disagreements becoming known to the world, has passed a resolution to that effect. Overall, my dear sir, you can understand my intentions better than I can articulate them, and I therefore fully rely on you to work toward resolving all personal conflicts between our main officers and the French, as well as to prevent any unkind comments or criticisms that may come from the army as a whole."

The General also seized the first opportunity to recommence his correspondence with the Count; and his letters, without noticing the disagreement which had taken place, were calculated to soothe every angry sensation which might have been excited. A letter from the admiral stating the whole transaction, was answered by General Washington in a manner so perfectly satisfactory, that the irritation which threatened such serious mischief, appears to have entirely subsided.

The General also took the first chance to start writing to the Count again; his letters, without mentioning the disagreement that had happened, were meant to calm any anger that might have arisen. A letter from the admiral detailing the entire situation was replied to by General Washington in such a satisfying way that the frustration that could have caused serious trouble seems to have completely gone away.

Congress also, in a resolution which was made public, expressed their perfect approbation of the conduct of the Count, and directed the presi[Pg 49]dent to assure him, in the letter which should transmit it, that they entertained the highest sense of his zeal and attachment.

Congress also, in a public resolution, expressed their full approval of the Count's actions and directed the president to assure him, in the letter that would accompany it, that they held his dedication and loyalty in the highest regard.

These prudent and temperate measures restored harmony to the allied armies.

These careful and moderate actions restored peace to the allied armies.

The storm under which the French fleet had suffered so severely did considerable damage also to that of Lord Howe. The British, however, had sustained less injury than the French, and were soon in a condition to put again to sea. Having received information that the Count D'Estaing had made for Boston, Lord Howe sailed for the same port, in the hope of reaching it before him. But in this he was disappointed. On entering the bay he found the French fleet already in Nantasket Road, where such judicious dispositions had been made for its defence, that he relinquished the idea of attacking it, and returned to New York; Lord Howe resigns command of the British fleet.where he resigned the command to Admiral Gambier, who was to retain it till the arrival of Admiral Byron.

The storm that severely affected the French fleet also caused significant damage to Lord Howe's fleet. However, the British experienced less damage than the French and were soon ready to sail again. After learning that Count D'Estaing was heading to Boston, Lord Howe set out for the same port, hoping to get there first. Unfortunately, he was disappointed. Upon entering the bay, he discovered the French fleet already in Nantasket Road, where effective defenses had been set up. He decided against attacking and returned to New York; Lord Howe steps down from commanding the British fleet. there, he handed over command to Admiral Gambier, who would keep the position until Admiral Byron arrived.

Finding that General Sullivan had retreated to the continent, Sir Henry Clinton returned to New York, leaving the command of the troops on board the transports with Major General Gray, who was directed to conduct an expedition to the eastward, as far as Buzzards bay.

Finding that General Sullivan had pulled back to the mainland, Sir Henry Clinton went back to New York, leaving Major General Gray in charge of the troops on board the transports. He was ordered to lead an expedition to the east, all the way to Buzzards Bay.

September 5.

Gray entered Acushnet River, where he destroyed a number of privateers with their prizes, and some merchant vessels. He also reduced part of the towns of Bedford and Fairhaven to[Pg 50] ashes, in which some military and naval stores had been collected. The troops re-embarked the next day, before the militia could be assembled in sufficient force to oppose them, and sailed to Martha's Vineyard, where they destroyed several vessels, and some salt works, and levied a heavy contribution of live stock on the inhabitants.

Gray entered the Acushnet River, where he took out several privateers along with their prizes and some merchant ships. He also burned down part of the towns of Bedford and Fairhaven, where some military and naval supplies had been stored. The troops boarded their ships again the next day, before the militia could gather enough forces to resist them, and sailed to Martha's Vineyard, where they destroyed several vessels, some saltworks, and demanded a significant amount of livestock from the locals.

While so large a detachment from the British army was depredating the coasts of New England, preparations were making in New York for some distant expedition; and many were of opinion that the French fleet was its object. To be in readiness to oppose a combined attack by sea and land on the fleet, General Gates was directed with three brigades, to proceed by easy marches as far as Danbury, in Connecticut. And Washington moved northward to Fredericksburg; while General Putnam was detached with two brigades to the neighbourhood of West Point, and General M'Dougal, with two others, to join General Gates at Danbury.

While a large group from the British army was plundering the coasts of New England, preparations were being made in New York for some distant mission, and many believed the French fleet was the target. To be ready to counter a combined attack by sea and land on the fleet, General Gates was ordered to move with three brigades, marching slowly as far as Danbury, Connecticut. Meanwhile, Washington headed north to Fredericksburg; General Putnam was sent with two brigades to the area around West Point, and General M'Dougal, with two more brigades, was sent to join General Gates in Danbury.

September 22.

Soon after the return of General Gray from New England, the British army moved up the North River on each side in great force. The column on the west side, commanded by Lord Cornwallis, consisting of about five thousand men, took a position with its right on the river, and its left extending to Newbridge, on the Hackensack; while the other division, which was commanded by General Knyphausen, consisting[Pg 51] of about three thousand men, was advanced about the same distance on the east side of the Hudson. The command of the river enabled these two columns to communicate freely with each other; and, at any time, to reunite. Although General Washington conjectured that this movement was made for the purpose of foraging, yet it was possible that the passes in the Highlands might be its object; and orders were given to the detachments on the lines to hold themselves in readiness to anticipate the execution of such a design.

Soon after General Gray returned from New England, the British army moved up the North River on both sides with a strong force. The column on the west side, led by Lord Cornwallis and made up of about five thousand men, positioned itself with its right on the river, stretching its left out to Newbridge, on the Hackensack. Meanwhile, the other division, commanded by General Knyphausen, consisting of about three thousand men, advanced the same distance on the east side of the Hudson. Controlling the river allowed these two columns to communicate easily and to reunite at any time. Although General Washington suspected this movement was aimed at foraging, it was also possible they intended to head for the passes in the Highlands. Orders were issued to the detachments on the lines to be ready to counter such a plan.

Colonel Baylor, with his regiment of cavalry, had crossed the Hackensack early in the morning of the 27th of September, and taken quarters at Taupaun, or Herringtown, a small village near New Taupaun, where some militia were posted. Immediate notice of his position was given to Lord Cornwallis, who formed a plan to surprise and cut off both the cavalry and militia. The party designed to act against Colonel Baylor was commanded by General Gray, and that against the militia, by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell.

Colonel Baylor, along with his cavalry regiment, crossed the Hackensack early in the morning on September 27th and set up camp at Taupaun, or Herringtown, a small village close to New Taupaun, where some militia were stationed. Lord Cornwallis was promptly informed of his location and devised a plan to ambush and eliminate both the cavalry and the militia. The group that was meant to target Colonel Baylor was led by General Gray, while Lieutenant Colonel Campbell commanded the operation against the militia.

September 28.

That part of the plan which was to be executed by Campbell was defeated by delays in passing the river, during which a deserter gave notice of his approach, and the militia saved themselves by flight. But the corps commanded by General Gray, guided by some of the country people, eluded the patrols, got into the rear of[Pg 52] the sergeant's guard which had been posted at a bridge over the Hackensack, cut it off without alarming Baylor, Colonel Baylor's regiment surprised.and completely surprised his whole regiment. The British troops rushed into a barn where the Americans slept; and, refusing to give quarter, bayoneted for a time all they saw. Of one hundred and four privates, sixty-seven were killed, wounded, and taken. The number of prisoners, amounting to about forty, is stated to have been increased by the humanity of one of Gray's captains, who, notwithstanding his orders, gave quarter to the whole of the fourth troop. Colonel Baylor and Major Clough, who were both wounded with the bayonet, the first dangerously, the last mortally, were among the prisoners.

That part of the plan that Campbell was supposed to carry out was thwarted by delays in crossing the river, during which a deserter alerted the enemy to their approach, causing the militia to flee. However, the unit led by General Gray managed to avoid detection thanks to some locals, and they got behind[Pg 52] the guard set by the sergeant at a bridge over the Hackensack, catching them off guard and completely surprising Baylor's whole regiment. The British troops stormed into a barn where the Americans were sleeping, and with no mercy, they bayoneted everyone they saw for a period of time. Out of one hundred and four privates, sixty-seven were killed, wounded, or captured. The number of prisoners, which was about forty, was reportedly increased by the compassion of one of Gray's captains, who, despite his orders, spared the entire fourth troop. Colonel Baylor and Major Clough, both of whom were injured by bayonets—Baylor severely and Clough fatally—were among the captured.

September 30.
Captain Donop, with his corps, attacked by Colonel Butler, and defeated.

Three days after this affair, Colonel Richard Butler, with a detachment of infantry, assisted by Major Lee with a part of his cavalry, fell in with a small party of chasseurs and yagers under Captain Donop, which he instantly charged, and, without the loss of a man, killed ten on the spot, and took the officer commanding the chasseur, and eighteen of the yagers, prisoners. Only the extreme roughness of the country, which impeded the action of the cavalry, and prevented part of the infantry from coming up, enabled a man of the enemy to escape. Some interest was taken at the time in this small affair, because it seemed, in some measure, to revenge the loss of Colonel Baylor.[Pg 53]

Three days after this incident, Colonel Richard Butler, along with a group of infantry and Major Lee with part of his cavalry, encountered a small party of chasseurs and yagers led by Captain Donop. He immediately charged them, and without losing a single man, killed ten on the spot and captured the officer in charge of the chasseurs and eighteen of the yagers. Only the rough terrain, which slowed down the cavalry and prevented some of the infantry from joining in, allowed one enemy soldier to escape. This small skirmish attracted some attention at the time because it seemed to partially avenge the loss of Colonel Baylor.[Pg 53]

After completing their forage, the British army returned to New York.

After finishing their search for supplies, the British army went back to New York.

Expedition of the British against Egg Harbour.

This movement had been, in part, designed to cover an expedition against Little Egg Harbour, which was completely successful; and the works and store-houses at the place, as well as the merchandise and vessels, were entirely destroyed.

This movement was, in part, meant to support an operation against Little Egg Harbour, which ended up being entirely successful; all the facilities and warehouses there, along with the goods and ships, were completely destroyed.

It has been already stated that Count Pulaski had been appointed general of the American cavalry. The dissatisfaction given by this appointment to the officers, had induced him to resign his commission; but, thirsting for military fame, and zealous in the American cause, he obtained permission to raise a legionary corps, which he officered chiefly with foreigners, and commanded in person. In this corps, one Juliet, a deserter, had been admitted as an officer. The Count had been ordered to march from Trenton towards Little Egg Harbour, and was lying eight or ten miles from the coast, when this Juliet again deserted, carrying with him intelligence of Pulaski's strength and situation. Pulaski surprised, and his infantry cut off.A plan was formed to surprise him, which succeeded completely so far as respected his infantry, who were put to the bayonet. The British accounts of this expedition assert that the whole corps was destroyed. Pulaski stated his loss at about forty; and averred that on coming up with his cavalry to the relief of his infantry, he repulsed the enemy. It is probable that the[Pg 54] one account diminishes the importance of this enterprise as much as the other magnifies it.

It has already been stated that Count Pulaski was appointed as the general of the American cavalry. The dissatisfaction this appointment caused among the officers led him to resign his commission; however, eager for military fame and passionate about the American cause, he got permission to form a legionary corps, which he primarily staffed with foreigners and commanded personally. In this corps, a deserter named Juliet was accepted as an officer. The Count had been ordered to march from Trenton toward Little Egg Harbor and was positioned eight or ten miles from the coast when this Juliet deserted again, taking information about Pulaski's strength and location. Pulaski was taken by surprise, and his infantry was cut off. A plan was made to surprise him, which fully succeeded regarding his infantry, who were attacked with bayonets. British accounts of this expedition claim that the entire corps was destroyed. Pulaski reported his losses to be around forty and asserted that when he arrived with his cavalry to support his infantry, he drove back the enemy. It’s likely that the[Pg 54] one account downplays the significance of this operation just as much as the other exaggerates it.

October 12.

Admiral Byron reached New York, and took command of the fleet about the middle of September. After repairing his shattered vessels, he sailed for the port of Boston. Soon after his arrival in the bay, fortune disconcerted all his plans. A furious storm drove him out to sea, and damaged his fleet so much that he found it necessary to put into the port of Rhode Island to refit. This favourable moment was seized by the Count D'Estaing, who sailed, on the 3d of November, for the West Indies.

Admiral Byron arrived in New York and took command of the fleet around mid-September. After fixing his damaged ships, he set sail for the port of Boston. Shortly after he got to the bay, bad luck derailed all his plans. A violent storm pushed him out to sea and caused so much damage to his fleet that he had to head to the port of Rhode Island for repairs. This was the perfect chance for Count D'Estaing, who left for the West Indies on November 3rd.

Thus terminated an expedition from which the most important advantages had been anticipated. A variety of accidents had defeated plans judiciously formed, which had every probability in their favour.

Thus ended an expedition from which the most significant benefits had been expected. A series of accidents had undermined carefully made plans that seemed likely to succeed.

The Marquis de Lafayette, ambitious of fame on another theatre, was desirous of returning to France. Expecting war on the continent of Europe, he was anxious to tender his services to his king, and to his native country.

The Marquis de Lafayette, eager for fame in a different arena, wanted to go back to France. Anticipating war in Europe, he was keen to offer his services to his king and to his homeland.

From motives of real friendship as well as of policy, General Washington was desirous of preserving the connexion of this officer with the army, and of strengthening his attachment to America. He therefore expressed to congress his wish that Lafayette, instead of resigning his commission, might have unlimited leave of absence, to return when it should be convenient to[Pg 55] himself; and might carry with him every mark of the confidence of the government.

From genuine friendship and strategic reasons, General Washington wanted to keep this officer connected to the army and strengthen his loyalty to America. So, he told Congress that he hoped Lafayette, instead of quitting his commission, could have unlimited leave of absence to return whenever it suited him[Pg 55] and that he could take with him every sign of the government's trust.

This policy was adopted by congress in its full extent. The partiality of America for Lafayette was well placed. Never did a foreigner, whose primary attachments to his own country remained undiminished, feel more solicitude for the welfare of another, than was unceasingly manifested by this young nobleman, for the United States.

This policy was fully adopted by Congress. America's favoritism for Lafayette was well-deserved. Never before had a foreigner, whose loyalty to his own country was still strong, shown as much concern for the well-being of another country as this young nobleman did for the United States.

There being no prospect of an active winter campaign in the northern or middle states, and the climate admitting of military operations elsewhere, a detachment from the British army, consisting of five thousand men commanded by Major General Grant, sailed, early in November, under a strong convoy, for the West India Islands; and, towards the end of the same month, another embarkation was made for the southern parts of the continent. This second detachment was commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who was escorted by Commodore Hyde Parker, and was destined to act against the southern states.

With no expectation of an active winter campaign in the northern or midwestern states, and the weather allowing for military operations elsewhere, a group from the British army, made up of five thousand men led by Major General Grant, set sail in early November under heavy escort for the West Indies. Towards the end of the same month, another group was assembled for the southern parts of the continent. This second group was led by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who was escorted by Commodore Hyde Parker, and was intended to operate against the southern states.

December.

As a force sufficient for the defence of New York yet remained, the American army retired into winter quarters. The main body was cantoned in Connecticut, on both sides the North River, about West Point, and at Middlebrook. Light troops were stationed nearer the lines; and the cavalry were drawn into the interior to re[Pg 56]cruit the horses for the next campaign. The distribution, the protection of the country, the security of important points, and a cheap and convenient supply of provisions, were consulted.

As a force strong enough to defend New York still remained, the American army retreated into winter quarters. The main group was stationed in Connecticut, on both sides of the North River, around West Point, and at Middlebrook. Light troops were positioned closer to the front lines, and the cavalry was moved inland to re[Pg 56]cruit the horses for the next campaign. They considered the distribution, protection of the country, security of key locations, and an affordable and convenient supply of food.

The troops again wintered in huts; but they were accustomed to this mode of passing that inclement season. Though far from being well clothed, their condition in that respect was so much improved by supplies from France, that they disregarded the inconveniences to which they were exposed.

The troops spent the winter in huts again, but they were used to this way of getting through that harsh season. Even though they weren't well dressed, their situation had improved enough thanks to supplies from France that they overlooked the disadvantages they faced.


CHAPTER III.

Arrival of the British commissioners.... Terms of conciliation proposed.... Answer of congress to their propositions.... Attempts of Mr. Johnson to bribe some members of congress.... His private letters ordered to be published.... Manifesto of the commissioners, and counter-manifesto of congress.... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, minister plenipotentiary of France.... Hostilities of the Indians.... Irruption into the Wyoming settlement.... Battle of Wyoming.... Colonel Dennison capitulates for the inhabitants.... Distress of the settlement.... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent.... Congress determines to invade Canada.... General Washington opposes the measure.... Induces congress to abandon it.

Arrival of the British commissioners.... Proposed terms for peace.... Congress's response to their proposals.... Mr. Johnson's attempts to bribe some members of Congress.... His private letters were ordered to be published.... The commissioners' manifesto, and Congress's counter-manifesto.... Arrival of Monsieur Girard, the Minister Plenipotentiary of France.... Conflicts with the Indians.... Invasion of the Wyoming settlement.... Battle of Wyoming.... Colonel Dennison surrenders for the residents.... Hardship in the settlement.... Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincent.... Congress decides to invade Canada.... General Washington disagrees with the plan.... He persuades Congress to drop it.

 

1778

About the time that Commodore Parker sailed for the southern states, the commissioners appointed to give effect to the late conciliatory acts of Parliament, embarked for Europe. They had exerted their utmost powers to effect the object of their mission, but without success. Great Britain required that the force of the two nations should be united under one common sovereign; and America was no longer disposed, or even at liberty to accede to this condition. All those affections, which parts of the same empire should feel for each other, had been eradicated by a distressing war; the great body of the people were determined, at every sacrifice, to maintain their independence; and the treaty with France had pledged the honour and the faith of[Pg 58] the nation, never to consent to a reunion with the British empire.

About the time Commodore Parker set sail for the southern states, the commissioners appointed to implement the recent conciliatory acts of Parliament headed off to Europe. They had done everything in their power to achieve their mission, but it was all in vain. Great Britain insisted that both nations must be united under a single ruler; however, America was no longer willing or able to agree to this condition. All the bonds that parts of the same empire should have for one another had been destroyed by a painful war; the vast majority of the people were committed, at any cost, to preserving their independence; and the treaty with France had guaranteed the honor and faith of [Pg 58] the nation, promising never to consent to rejoining the British Empire.

Arrival of the British commissioners.

The commissioners arrived in Philadelphia while that place was yet in possession of their army, and are understood to have brought positive orders for its evacuation. Their arrival was immediately announced to General Washington by Sir Henry Clinton, who was joined with them in the commission, and a passport was requested for their secretary, Doctor Ferguson, as the bearer of their first despatches to congress. The Commander-in-chief declined granting this passport until he should receive the instructions of his government; Terms of conciliation proposed.on which a letter addressed "To the president and other the members of congress," was forwarded in the usual manner. Copies of their commission, and of the acts of Parliament on which it was founded, together with propositions conforming to those acts, drawn in the most conciliatory language, were transmitted with this letter.

The commissioners arrived in Philadelphia while the city was still under their army's control, and they were believed to have brought direct orders for its evacuation. Sir Henry Clinton, who was part of the commission, immediately informed General Washington of their arrival and requested a passport for their secretary, Doctor Ferguson, to carry their first dispatches to Congress. The Commander-in-chief refused to grant this passport until he received instructions from his government; Proposed settlement terms. As a result, a letter addressed "To the president and other members of Congress" was sent in the usual way. Included with this letter were copies of their commission and the acts of Parliament that it was based on, along with proposals aligned with those acts, written in the most conciliatory language.

Some observations having been introduced into it reflecting on the conduct of France,[10] the reading was interrupted, and a motion made to proceed no farther in consequence of this offensive language to his most Christian Majesty. This motion producing some debate, an adjournment was moved and carried. When congress[Pg 59] reassembled, the warmth of the preceding day had not entirely subsided; but, after several ineffectual motions to prevent it, the letter was read and committed. Answer of Congress to these propositions.The answer which was reported by the committee, and transmitted to the commissioners, declared that "nothing but an earnest desire to spare the farther effusion of human blood, could have induced them to read a paper containing expressions so disrespectful to his most Christian Majesty, the good and great ally of these states, or to consider propositions so derogatory to the honour of an independent nation.

Some observations were brought up regarding the behavior of France,[10] which led to an interruption in the reading, and a motion was made to stop further discussion due to the offensive language directed at his most Christian Majesty. This motion sparked a debate, which resulted in an adjournment. When congress[Pg 59] reconvened, the intensity from the previous day had not fully faded; however, despite several unsuccessful attempts to stop it, the letter was read and sent to committee. Response of Congress to these proposals. The response reported by the committee and sent to the commissioners stated that "only a sincere wish to prevent further loss of human life could have prompted them to read a document containing such disrespectful remarks about his most Christian Majesty, the noble and honorable ally of these states, or to consider proposals that undermine the dignity of an independent nation."

"That the acts of the British Parliament, the commission from their sovereign, and their letter, supposed the people of the United States to be subjects of the crown of Great Britain, and were founded on the idea of dependence, which is totally inadmissible.

"That the actions of the British Parliament, the commission from their sovereign, and their letter assumed that the people of the United States were subjects of the British crown, based on the idea of dependence, which is completely unacceptable."

"That congress was inclined to peace, notwithstanding the unjust claims from which this was originated, and the savage manner in which it was conducted. They would therefore be ready to enter upon the consideration of a treaty of peace and commerce, not inconsistent with treaties already subsisting, when the King of Great Britain should demonstrate a sincere disposition for that purpose. The only solid proof of this disposition would be an explicit acknowledgment of the independence of these states, or the withdrawing his fleets and armies."[Pg 60]

"That congress was open to peace, despite the unfair claims that started this conflict and the brutal way it was fought. They would therefore be willing to discuss a peace and trade treaty that wouldn't conflict with existing agreements when the King of Great Britain showed a genuine willingness for that. The only clear sign of this willingness would be a straightforward acknowledgment of these states' independence or the withdrawal of his fleets and armies."[Pg 60]

July 13.

On the 13th of July, after arriving at New York, the commissioners addressed a second letter to congress, expressing their regrets that any difficulties were raised which must prolong the calamities of war; and reviewing the letter of congress in terms well calculated to make an impression on those who had become weary of the contest, and to revive ancient prejudices in favour of England and against France.

On July 13th, after arriving in New York, the commissioners sent a second letter to Congress, expressing their regret that any issues had arisen that would extend the suffering of war. They reviewed Congress's letter in a way that was likely to resonate with those who had grown tired of the struggle and to reignite old biases in favor of England and against France.

This letter being read, congress resolved that, as neither the independence of the United States was explicitly acknowledged, nor the fleets and armies withdrawn, no answer should be given to it.

This letter being read, Congress decided that, since neither the independence of the United States was clearly recognized nor the fleets and armies removed, no response should be made to it.

It would seem that the first letter of congress must have convinced the British commissioners that no hope could be indulged of restoring peace on any other terms than the independence of the United States. Congress must have been equally certain that the commissioners were not empowered to acknowledge that independence, or to direct the fleets and armies of Great Britain to be withdrawn. The intercourse between them therefore, after the first communications were exchanged, and all subsequent measures, became a game of skill, in which the parties played for the affections and passions of the people; and was no longer a diplomatic correspondence, discussing the interests of two great nations with the hope of accommodation.[Pg 61]

It seems that the first letter from Congress must have convinced the British commissioners that there was no hope for restoring peace unless the United States gained independence. Congress must have been equally confident that the commissioners were not authorized to recognize that independence or to order the British fleets and armies to withdraw. Thus, after the initial communications were exchanged, the interactions between them became a strategic game, where both sides tried to appeal to the emotions and passions of the people, rather than a diplomatic exchange focused on the interests of two great nations with the aim of reaching an agreement.[Pg 61]

Attempts of Mr. Johnson to bribe influential members of congress.

The first packet addressed by the commissioners to congress, contained several private letters, written by Governor Johnson to members of that body, in which he blended, with flattering expressions of respect for their characters and their conduct, assurances of the honours and emoluments to which those would be entitled who should contribute to restore peace and harmony to the two countries and to terminate the present war.

The first packet sent by the commissioners to Congress included several private letters from Governor Johnson to members of that body. In these letters, he mixed flattering remarks about their character and actions with assurances of the honors and benefits that those who helped restore peace and harmony between the two countries and end the current war would receive.

A few days before the receipt of the letter of the 13th of July, congress passed a resolution requiring that all letters of a public nature received by any member from any subject of the British crown, should be laid before them. In compliance with this resolution, the letters of Governor Johnson were produced; and, some time afterwards, Mr. Read stated, in his place, a direct offer which had been made him by a third person, of a considerable sum of money, and of any office in the gift of the crown, as an inducement to use his influence for the restoration of harmony between the two countries. Congress orders the publication of the private letters from Johnson to the members of that body.Congress determined to communicate these circumstances to the American people, and made a solemn declaration, in which, after reciting the offensive paragraphs of the private letters, and the conversation stated by Mr. Read, they expressed their opinion "that these were direct attempts to corrupt and bribe the congress of the United States, and that it was incompatible with[Pg 62] their honour to hold any manner of correspondence or intercourse with the said George Johnson, Esquire, especially to negotiate with him upon affairs in which the cause of liberty is interested." After an unsuccessful attempt to involve the other commissioners in the same exclusion, this declaration was transmitted to them while they were expecting an answer to a remonstrance on the detention of the army of General Burgoyne.

A few days before receiving the letter dated July 13th, Congress passed a resolution requiring that all public letters received by any member from any subject of the British crown be presented to them. In accordance with this resolution, the letters from Governor Johnson were submitted; and some time later, Mr. Read mentioned, in his place, a direct offer made to him by a third party of a significant sum of money and any position from the crown as an incentive to use his influence for restoring harmony between the two countries. Congress orders the publication of the private letters from Johnson to its members. Congress decided to share these details with the American people and made a solemn declaration, in which, after citing the offensive sections of the private letters and the conversation recounted by Mr. Read, they expressed their belief "that these were direct attempts to corrupt and bribe the Congress of the United States, and that it was incompatible with[Pg 62] their honor to hold any correspondence or interaction with the said George Johnson, Esquire, especially to negotiate with him on matters concerning the cause of liberty." After an unsuccessful attempt to include the other commissioners in this exclusion, this declaration was sent to them while they awaited a response to a remonstrance regarding the detention of General Burgoyne's army.

On receiving it, Mr. Johnson withdrew from the commission, declaring that he should be happy to find congress inclined to retract their former declaration, and to negotiate with others on terms equally conducive to the happiness of both countries. This declaration was accompanied by one signed by the other commissioners, in which, without admitting the construction put by congress on his letters, or the authority of the person who held the conversation with Mr. Read, they denied all knowledge of those letters or of that conversation. They at the same time detailed the advantages to be derived by America from the propositions they had made, "advantages," they added, "decidedly superior to any which could be expected from an unnatural alliance with France, only entered into by that nation for the purpose of prolonging the war, after the full knowledge on their part of the liberal terms intended to be offered by Great Britain." With this declaration[Pg 63] was transmitted a copy of the former remonstrance[11] against the detention of the convention troops, without the signature of Governor Johnson, and an extract from the instructions given by the Secretary of State to Sir Henry Clinton, authorizing him to demand, in express terms, a performance of the convention made with General Burgoyne, and, if required, to renew and ratify all its conditions in the name of the king.

Upon receiving it, Mr. Johnson stepped back from the commission, stating that he would be pleased to see Congress willing to retract their previous declaration and to negotiate with others on terms that would be good for both countries. This statement was accompanied by one signed by the other commissioners, in which, without agreeing with the interpretation Congress placed on his letters or the authority of the person who spoke with Mr. Read, they claimed they had no knowledge of those letters or that conversation. At the same time, they explained the benefits America would gain from the proposals they had made, stating that those benefits were "definitely superior to anything that could be expected from an unnatural alliance with France, which was only entered into by that nation to prolong the war, fully knowing the generous terms that Great Britain intended to offer." Along with this declaration[Pg 63] was sent a copy of the earlier protest[11] against the holding of the convention troops, without Governor Johnson's signature, and a passage from the instructions given by the Secretary of State to Sir Henry Clinton, authorizing him to demand explicitly the fulfillment of the convention made with General Burgoyne and, if necessary, to renew and ratify all its terms in the name of the king.

All the publications of the British commissioners indicate an opinion that they could be more successful with the people than with congress; and, not unfrequently betray the desire that the constituents of that body might be enabled to decide on the measures taken by their representatives.

All the reports from the British commissioners show that they believe they could connect better with the people than with Congress; they often reveal a wish for the constituents of that body to have the chance to weigh in on the decisions made by their representatives.

On the part of congress, it was decreed of the utmost importance to keep the public mind correct, and to defeat all attempts to make unfavourable impressions on it. Several members of that body entered the lists as disputants, and employed their pens with ability and success, as well in serious argument, as in rousing the various passions which influence the conduct of men. The attempt to accomplish the object of the mission by corruption was wielded with great effect; and it was urged with equal force[Pg 64] that should the United States now break their faith with France, and treat on the footing of dependence, they would sacrifice all credit with foreign nations, would be considered by all as faithless and infamous, and would forfeit all pretensions to future aid from abroad; after which the terms now offered might be retracted, and the war be recommenced. To these representations were added the certainty of independence, and the great advantages which must result from its establishment. The letters of the commissioners were treated as attempts to sow divisions among the people of which they might afterwards avail themselves, and thus effect by intrigue, what had been found unattainable by arms.

On Congress's part, it was deemed crucial to keep the public perspective accurate and to thwart any attempts to create negative impressions. Several members took to debating and skillfully used their writing to argue seriously and stir up various emotions that influence people's actions. The attempt to achieve the mission's goals through corruption was wielded effectively; it was argued just as strongly that if the United States were to break faith with France now and act in a dependent manner, they would lose all credibility with foreign nations, be seen as untrustworthy and disgraceful, and forfeit any claims to future assistance from abroad. After that, the terms currently offered might be revoked, and the war could restart. To these claims, they added the certainty of independence and the significant benefits that would come from establishing it. The commissioners' letters were seen as efforts to create divisions among the people, which they might later exploit, achieving through intrigue what had proven impossible through military means.

These essays were read with avidity, and seem to have produced all the effect which was expected from them among the friends of the revolution.

These essays were read eagerly and appear to have had the impact that was anticipated among the supporters of the revolution.

October 8.

The commissioners appear still to have cherished the hope, that a complete knowledge of the terms they had offered, operating on the disappointment of the extravagant hopes which had been founded on the arrival of a French fleet, would make a great impression on a large portion of the American people. This opinion induced them, before their departure, to publish a manifesto, addressed, not only to congress, but to all the provincial assemblies, and all the inhabitants of the colonies of whatever denomina[Pg 65]tion, briefly recapitulating the several steps they had taken to accomplish the object of their mission, and the refusal of congress even to open a conference with them. Manifesto of the commissioners, and counter-manifestos by congress.They declared their readiness still to proceed in the execution of the powers contained in their commission, and to treat either with deputies from all the colonies conjointly, or with any provincial assembly or convention individually, at any time within the space of forty days from the date of their manifesto. They also proclaimed a general pardon for all treasons and rebellious practices committed at any time previous to the date of their manifesto, to such as should, within the term of forty days, withdraw from their opposition to the British government, and conduct themselves as faithful and loyal subjects. To enable all persons to avail themselves of this proffered pardon, thirteen copies of the manifesto were executed, one of which was transmitted by a flag of truce to each state. A vast number of copies were printed, and great exertions were made by flags and other means to disperse them among the people.

The commissioners still seemed to hold onto the hope that full transparency about the terms they offered, coupled with the letdown of the unrealistic expectations built on the arrival of a French fleet, would greatly influence many Americans. This belief led them, before leaving, to publish a manifesto that was directed not only to Congress but also to all provincial assemblies and residents of the colonies, regardless of their affiliation, where they briefly outlined the steps they took to achieve their mission and Congress's refusal to even engage in discussions with them. They announced their willingness to move forward with the authority granted to them and to negotiate either with representatives from all the colonies together or with any provincial assembly or convention individually, at any point within forty days from the date of their manifesto. They also offered a general pardon for all acts of treason and rebellion committed before the manifesto's date, to those who, within the forty-day period, abandoned their resistance to the British government and acted as loyal subjects. To ensure everyone could take advantage of this offered pardon, they printed thirteen copies of the manifesto, sending one via a flag of truce to each state. Many copies were printed, and significant efforts were made through flags and other methods to spread them among the public.

On being informed of these proceedings, congress, without hesitation, adopted the course which the government of an independent nation is bound to pursue, when attempts are made by a foreign power to open negotiations with unauthorized individuals. They declared the measure "to be contrary to the law of nations,[Pg 66] and utterly subversive of that confidence which could alone maintain those means which had been invented to alleviate the horrors of war; and, therefore, that the persons employed to distribute such papers, were not entitled to the protection of a flag." They recommended it to the executive departments in the respective states, "to secure, in close custody, every person who, under the sanction of a flag, or otherwise, was found employed in circulating those manifestoes." At the same time, to show that these measures were not taken for the purpose of concealment, they directed a publication of the manifesto in the American papers. Care, however, was taken to accompany it with comments made by individuals, calculated to counteract its effect. A vessel containing a cargo of these papers being wrecked on the coast, the officers and crew were made prisoners; and the requisition of Admiral Gambier for their release, in consequence of the privilege afforded by his flag, was answered by a declaration that they had forfeited that privilege by being charged with seditious papers.

Upon learning about these events, Congress quickly decided to take the appropriate action that a government of an independent nation must take when a foreign power tries to negotiate with unauthorized individuals. They declared the action "to be against international law,[Pg 66] and completely undermining the trust necessary to uphold the means created to ease the horrors of war; therefore, the individuals involved in distributing such documents were not entitled to the protection of a flag." They urged the executive branches in the respective states "to securely detain anyone who, under the protection of a flag or otherwise, was found distributing those manifestos." At the same time, to demonstrate that these actions were not meant to hide anything, they ordered the manifesto to be published in American newspapers. However, care was taken to include comments from individuals designed to mitigate its impact. When a ship carrying a cargo of these papers was wrecked along the coast, its officers and crew were taken prisoner; Admiral Gambier's request for their release, based on the privilege of his flag, was met with a declaration that they had forfeited that privilege by being accused of possessing seditious documents.

October 30.

Not long after the publication of this paper, a counter-manifesto was issued by congress, in which, after touching on subjects which might influence the public mind, they "solemnly declare and proclaim, that if their enemies presume to execute their threats, or persist in their present course of barbarity, they will take such[Pg 67] exemplary vengeance as shall deter others from a like conduct."

Not long after this paper was published, Congress issued a counter-manifesto, in which, after discussing topics that might sway public opinion, they "solemnly declare and proclaim that if their enemies attempt to carry out their threats or continue their current brutal actions, they will take such[Pg 67] exemplary revenge that it will discourage others from similar behavior."

Thus ended this fruitless attempt to restore a connexion which had been wantonly broken, the reinstatement of which had become impracticable. With the war, and with independence, a course of opinion had prevailed in America, which not only opposed great obstacles to a reunion of the two countries under one common sovereign, but, by substituting discordant materials in the place of the cement which formerly bound them together, rendered such an event undesirable even to the British themselves. The time was arrived when the true interest of that nation required the relinquishment of an expensive war, the object of which was unattainable, and which, if attained, could not be long preserved; and the establishment of those amicable relations which reciprocal interests produce between independent states, capable of being serviceable to each other by a fair and equal interchange of good offices.

Thus ended this pointless attempt to restore a connection that had been carelessly severed, a revival of which had become unfeasible. With the war and independence, a prevailing opinion emerged in America that not only posed significant obstacles to reuniting the two countries under one common ruler but also, by replacing the binding elements that once held them together with conflicting forces, made such an event undesirable even for the British. The time had come when the true interests of that nation required giving up an expensive war, the goals of which were unattainable and, if achieved, could not be maintained for long; and the establishment of friendly relations that mutual interests create between independent states, capable of benefiting each other through fair and equal exchanges of goodwill.

This opinion, however, was not yet embraced by the cabinet of London; and great exertions were still to be made for the reannexation of the American states to the British empire. Even the opposition was not united against a continuance of the war for the object now proposed; and the Earl of Chatham, who had endeavoured first to prevent the conflict, and afterwards to produce conciliation, closed his splendid life in unavail[Pg 68]ing efforts to prevent that dismemberment which had become inevitable.[12]

This opinion, however, had not yet been accepted by the cabinet in London; and significant efforts were still needed to bring the American states back into the British empire. Even the opposition wasn't fully united against continuing the war for this goal; and the Earl of Chatham, who initially tried to avoid the conflict and later sought reconciliation, spent the final days of his remarkable life making futile attempts to stop the dismemberment that had become unavoidable.[Pg 68][12]

July 14.
Arrival of Girard, minister plenipotentiary from the King of France.

In the midst of these transactions with the commissioners of Great Britain, the Sieur Girard arrived at Philadelphia, in the character of Minister Plenipotentiary of his Most Christian Majesty.

In the middle of these dealings with the commissioners from Great Britain, Mr. Girard arrived in Philadelphia as the Ambassador of his Most Christian Majesty.

The joy produced by this event was unbounded; and he was received by congress with great pomp.

The joy from this event was immense, and he was welcomed by Congress with great ceremony.

While these diplomatic concerns employed the American cabinet, and while the war seemed to languish on the Atlantic, it raged to the west in its most savage form.[Pg 69]

While these diplomatic issues occupied the American cabinet, and while the war seemed to drag on in the Atlantic, it was raging in its most brutal form to the west.[Pg 69]

The difficulties which the inability of the American government to furnish the neighbouring Indians with those European articles which they were accustomed to use, opposed to all the efforts of congress to preserve their friendship, have already been noticed. Early in 1778, there were many indications of a general disposition among those savages to make war on the United States; and the frontiers, from the Mohawk to the Ohio, were threatened with the tomahawk and the scalping knife. Every representation from that country supported the opinion that a war with the Indians should never be defensive; and that, to obtain peace, it must be carried into[Pg 70] their own country. Detroit, whose governor was believed to have been particularly active in exciting hostilities, was understood to be in a defenceless condition; and congress resolved on an expedition against that place. June 11.This enterprise was entrusted to General M'Intosh, who commanded at Pittsburg, and was to be carried on with three thousand men, chiefly militia, to be drawn from Virginia. To facilitate its success, the resolution was also taken to enter the country of the Senecas at the same time, by the way of the Mohawk. The officer commanding on the east of the Hudson was desired to take measures for carrying this resolution into execution; and the commissioners for Indian affairs, at Albany, were directed to co-operate with him.

The challenges arising from the American government's inability to provide the nearby Native Americans with the European goods they were used to hampered all of Congress's efforts to maintain their friendship. Early in 1778, there were many signs that these tribes were ready to go to war against the United States, and the frontiers, from the Mohawk to the Ohio, were under threat from attacks. Every report from the area supported the belief that any conflict with the Native Americans should never be defensive; rather, to achieve peace, it had to be taken into[Pg 70] their territory. Detroit, whose governor was thought to be particularly influential in stirring up conflict, was seen as vulnerable; therefore, Congress decided to launch an expedition against that location. June 11th. This mission was assigned to General M'Intosh, who led the troops in Pittsburgh, and it would involve three thousand men, mostly militia, drawn from Virginia. To enhance its chances of success, it was also decided to move into the Seneca territory simultaneously, using the Mohawk route. The officer in command east of the Hudson was instructed to take steps to carry out this plan, and the Indian affairs commissioners in Albany were directed to assist him.

Unfortunately, the acts of the government did not correspond with the vigour of its resolutions. The necessary preparations were not made, and the inhabitants of the frontiers remained without sufficient protection, until the plans against them were matured, and the storm which had been long gathering, burst upon them with a fury which spread desolation wherever it reached.

Unfortunately, the government’s actions didn’t match the energy of its plans. The necessary preparations weren’t made, leaving the people living on the borders without enough protection until the threats against them were fully developed. The storm that had been building for a long time finally hit with a force that caused devastation wherever it struck.

Colonel John Butler, with a party of Indians, breaks into the Wyoming settlement.

About three hundred white men, commanded by Colonel John Butler, and about five hundred Indians, led by the Indian chief Brandt, who had assembled in the north, marched late in June against the settlement of Wyoming. These troops embarked on the Chemung or Tyoga, and[Pg 71] descending the Susquehanna, landed at a place called the Three Islands, whence they marched about twenty miles, and crossing a wilderness, and passing through a gap in the mountain, entered the valley of Wyoming near its northern boundary. At this place a small fort called Wintermoots had been erected, which fell into their hands without resistance, and was burnt. The inhabitants who were capable of bearing arms assembled on the first alarm at Forty fort, on the west side of the Susquehanna, four miles below the camp of the invading army.

About three hundred white men, led by Colonel John Butler, and around five hundred Indians, headed by the Indian chief Brandt, who gathered in the north, marched late in June toward the settlement of Wyoming. These troops got on boats at the Chemung or Tyoga and[Pg 71]went down the Susquehanna, landing at a spot called the Three Islands. From there, they marched about twenty miles, crossed through a wilderness, and passed through a gap in the mountain to enter the Wyoming valley near its northern border. At this location, a small fort called Wintermoots had been built, which they captured without any resistance and burned down. The residents who could fight gathered at the first alarm at Forty Fort, on the west side of the Susquehanna, four miles below the invading army's camp.

The regular troops, amounting to about sixty, were commanded by Colonel Zebulon Butler;[13] the militia by Colonel Dennison. Colonel Butler was desirous of awaiting the arrival of a small reinforcement under Captain Spalding, who had been ordered by General Washington to his aid on the first intelligence of the danger which threatened the settlement; but the militia generally, believing themselves sufficiently strong to repel the invading force, urged an immediate battle so earnestly, that Colonel Butler yielded to their remonstrances, and on the 3d of July marched from Forty fort at the head of near four hundred men to attack the enemy.

The regular troops, numbering about sixty, were led by Colonel Zebulon Butler;[13] while Colonel Dennison commanded the militia. Colonel Butler wanted to wait for a small reinforcement under Captain Spalding, who had been sent by General Washington to assist him as soon as news of the danger to the settlement reached them. However, the militia felt confident they were strong enough to fend off the invading force and insisted on an immediate battle. Their urgent pleas convinced Colonel Butler, and on July 3rd, he marched from Forty Fort at the head of nearly four hundred men to confront the enemy.

The British and Indians were prepared to receive him. Their line was formed a small distance in front of their camp, in a plain thinly[Pg 72] covered with pine, shrub oaks, and under growth, and extended from the river about a mile to a marsh at the foot of the mountain. The Americans advanced in a single column, without interruption, until they approached the enemy, when they received a fire which did not much mischief. The line of battle[14] was instantly[Pg 73] formed, and the action commenced with spirit. The Americans rather gained ground on the right where Colonel Butler commanded, until a large body of Indians passing through the skirt of the marsh turned their left flank, which was composed of militia, and poured a heavy and most destructive fire on their rear. The word "re[Pg 74]treat" was pronounced by some person, and the efforts of the officers to check it were unavailing. The fate of the day was decided, and a flight commenced on the left which was soon followed by the right. As soon as the line was broken, the Indians, throwing down their rifles and rushing upon them with the tomahawk, completed the confusion. The attempt of Colonel Butler and of the officers to restore order were unavailing, and the whole line broke and fled in confusion. The massacre was general, and the cries for mercy were answered by the tomahawk. Rather less than sixty men escaped, some to Forty fort, some by swimming the river, and some to the mountain. A very few prisoners were made, only three of whom were preserved alive, who were carried to Niagara.

The British and Indians were ready for him. Their line was set up a short distance in front of their camp, in a plain sparsely[Pg 72] covered with pine, scrub oak, and underbrush, stretching from the river about a mile to a marsh at the base of the mountain. The Americans moved forward in a single column without stopping until they got close to the enemy, at which point they took some fire that didn’t do much damage. The battle line[14] was quickly organized, and the fight began with energy. The Americans seemed to gain ground on the right where Colonel Butler was in charge, until a large group of Indians, moving through the edge of the marsh, flanked their left side, which was made up of militia, and unleashed a heavy and devastating fire on their rear. The word "re[Pg 74]treat" was shouted by someone, and the officers’ attempts to stop it were useless. The outcome of the day was sealed, and a retreat began on the left, followed quickly by the right. Once the line was broken, the Indians, dropping their rifles and charging at them with tomahawks, added to the chaos. Colonel Butler and the officers’ efforts to restore order failed, and the whole line collapsed and fled in panic. The massacre was widespread, and cries for mercy were met with tomahawks. Just under sixty men escaped, some to Forty Fort, some by swimming the river, and others to the mountain. Very few prisoners were taken, with only three of them surviving, who were taken to Niagara.

Colonel Dennison capitulates for the inhabitants.

Further resistance was impracticable, Colonel Dennison proposed terms of capitulation, which[Pg 75] were granted to the inhabitants. It being understood that no quarter would be allowed to the continental troops, Colonel Butler with his few surviving soldiers fled from the valley.

Further resistance was unfeasible, so Colonel Dennison suggested terms of surrender, which[Pg 75] were accepted by the locals. It was clear that no mercy would be shown to the continental troops, and Colonel Butler, along with his remaining soldiers, escaped from the valley.

Distress of the settlement.

The inhabitants generally abandoned the country, and, in great distress, wandered into the settlements on the Lehigh and the Delaware. The Indians, as is the practice of savages, destroyed the houses and improvements by fire, and plundered the country. After laying waste the whole settlement, they withdrew from it before the arrival of the continental troops, who were detached to meet them.

The residents mostly left the area and, in deep distress, moved into the towns near the Lehigh and the Delaware. The Indians, as is common among them, burned down the homes and structures and looted the land. After ravaging the entire settlement, they left before the arrival of the continental troops that had been sent to confront them.

To cover every part of the United States would have required a much greater number of men than could be raised. Different districts were therefore unavoidably exposed to the calamities ever to be experienced by those into the bosom of whose country war is carried. The militia in every part of the Union, fatigued and worn out by repeated tours of duty, required to be relieved by continental troops. Their applications were necessarily resisted; but the danger which threatened the western frontier had become so imminent; the appeal made by its sufferings to national feeling was so affecting, that it was determined to spare a more considerable portion of the army for its defence, than had been allotted to that part of the Union, since the capture of Burgoyne. On the first intelligence of the destruction of Wyoming, the[Pg 76] regiments of Hartley and Butler, with the remnant of Morgan's corps, commanded by Major Posey, were detached to the protection of that distressed country. July 15.They were engaged in several sharp skirmishes, made separate incursions into the Indian settlements, broke up their nearest villages, destroyed their corn, and by compelling them to retire to a greater distance, gave some relief to the inhabitants.

Covering every part of the United States would have required many more men than could be mustered. As a result, different areas were inevitably vulnerable to the disasters that occur when war comes to a country. The militias across the Union, exhausted from repeated tours of duty, needed to be supported by regular troops. Their requests were often denied; however, the threat to the western frontier had become so serious and the suffering there so touching that it was decided to allocate a larger portion of the army for its defense than had been provided since Burgoyne's capture. Upon receiving news of the destruction of Wyoming, the [Pg 76] regiments of Hartley and Butler, along with the remnants of Morgan's corps led by Major Posey, were dispatched to protect that troubled area. July 15th. They engaged in several fierce skirmishes, conducted separate raids into the Indian settlements, disrupted their nearby villages, destroyed their crops, and by forcing them to retreat further away, provided some relief to the local residents.

While the frontiers of New York and Pennsylvania were thus suffering the calamities incident to savage warfare, a fate equally severe was preparing for Virginia. The western militia of that state had made some successful incursions into the country north-west of the Ohio, and had taken some British posts on the Mississippi. These were erected in the county of Illinois; and a regiment of infantry, with a troop of cavalry, were raised for its protection. The command of these troops was given to Colonel George Rogers Clarke, a gentleman whose courage, hardihood, and capacity for Indian warfare, had given repeated success to his enterprises against the savages.

While the borders of New York and Pennsylvania were facing the disasters that come with brutal warfare, an equally harsh fate was brewing for Virginia. The western militia from that state had made some successful raids into the area northwest of the Ohio and had captured some British posts along the Mississippi. These posts were established in what is now Illinois; a regiment of infantry and a cavalry troop were formed for its defense. Colonel George Rogers Clarke was appointed to lead these troops, a man whose bravery, resilience, and skill in fighting Native Americans had led to repeated victories in his campaigns against them.

This corps was divided into several detachments, the strongest of which remained with Colonel Clarke at Kaskaskia. Colonel Hamilton, the Governor of Detroit, was at Vincennes with about six hundred men, principally Indians, preparing an expedition, first against Kaskaskia, and then up the Ohio to Pittsburg; after which[Pg 77] he purposed to desolate the frontiers of Virginia. Clarke anticipated and defeated his design by one of those bold and decisive measures, which, whether formed on a great or a small scale, mark the military and enterprising genius of the man who plans and executes them.

This group was divided into several units, with the strongest one staying with Colonel Clarke at Kaskaskia. Colonel Hamilton, the Governor of Detroit, was at Vincennes with about six hundred men, mostly Indians, preparing for an expedition first against Kaskaskia, and then up the Ohio to Pittsburgh; after which[Pg 77] he planned to raid the frontiers of Virginia. Clarke anticipated and thwarted his plan with one of those bold and decisive actions that, whether large or small, showcase the military and adventurous spirit of the person who strategizes and carries them out.

He was too far removed from the inhabited country to hope for support, and was too weak to maintain Kaskaskia and the Illinois against the combined force of regulars and Indians by which he was to be attacked so soon as the season for action should arrive. While employed in preparing for his defence, he received unquestionable information that Hamilton had detached his Indians on an expedition against the frontiers, reserving at the post he occupied only about eighty regulars, with three pieces of cannon and some swivels. 1779 February.Clarke instantly resolved to seize this favourable moment. After detaching a small galley up the Wabash with orders to take her station a few miles below Vincennes, and to permit nothing to pass her, he marched in the depth of winter with one hundred and thirty men, the whole force he could collect, across the country from Kaskaskia to Vincennes. This march, through the woods, and over high waters, required sixteen days, five of which were employed in crossing the drowned lands of the Wabash. The troops were under the necessity of wading five miles in water, frequently up to their breasts. After subduing[Pg 78] these difficulties, Colonel Clarke surprises St. Vincents, and takes possession of it.this small party appeared before the town, which was completely surprised, and readily consented to change its master. Hamilton, after defending the fort a short time, surrendered himself and his garrison prisoners of war. With a few of his immediate agents and counsellors, who had been instrumental in the savage barbarities he had encouraged, he was, by order of the executive of Virginia, put in irons, and confined in a jail.

He was too isolated from the settled areas to expect any help and too weak to defend Kaskaskia and Illinois against the combined forces of regular soldiers and Native Americans that were set to attack him as soon as the season for action began. While he was getting ready to defend himself, he received solid information that Hamilton had sent his Indians on a mission against the frontiers, leaving only about eighty regular soldiers at his post, along with three cannons and some swivel guns. February 1779. Clarke quickly decided to take advantage of this opportunity. After sending a small boat up the Wabash River with orders to stay a few miles below Vincennes and not let anything pass, he marched in the dead of winter with one hundred thirty men, the entire force he could gather, across the countryside from Kaskaskia to Vincennes. This march through the woods and over flooded areas took sixteen days, five of which were spent crossing the flooded lands of the Wabash. The soldiers had to wade through five miles of water, often up to their chests. After overcoming[Pg 78] these challenges, Colonel Clarke catches St. Vincents off guard and takes control of it. this small group arrived at the town, which was completely caught off guard and quickly agreed to change leadership. Hamilton, after holding out in the fort for a short time, surrendered himself and his garrison as prisoners of war. Along with a few of his close associates and advisors, who had played a part in the brutal acts he had encouraged, he was, by order of the Virginia government, put in chains and locked up in jail.

This expedition was important in its consequences. It disconcerted a plan which threatened destruction to the whole country west of the Alleghany mountains; detached from the British interest many of those numerous tribes of Indians south of the waters immediately communicating with the great lakes; and had, most probably, considerable influence in fixing the western boundary of the United States.

This expedition had significant consequences. It disrupted a plan that posed a threat to the entire region west of the Allegheny Mountains; it pulled many of the various tribes of Indians south of the rivers directly connecting to the Great Lakes away from British influence; and it likely played a major role in establishing the western boundary of the United States.

We have already seen that congress, actuated by their wishes rather than governed by a temperate calculation of the means in their possession, had, in the preceding winter, planned a second invasion of Canada, to be conducted by the Marquis de Lafayette; and that, as the generals only were got in readiness for this expedition, it was necessarily laid aside. The design, however, seems to have been suspended, not abandoned. The alliance with France revived the latent wish to annex that extensive territory to the United States. That favourite subject[Pg 79] was resumed; Congress determine to attack Canada, and the other British possessions in North America.and, towards autumn, a plan was completely digested for a combined attack to be made by the allies on all the British dominions on the continent, and on the adjacent islands of Cape Breton and Newfoundland. This plan was matured about the time the Marquis de Lafayette obtained leave to return to his own country, and was ordered to be transmitted by that nobleman to Doctor Franklin, the minister of the United States at the court of Versailles, with instructions to induce, if possible, the French cabinet to accede to it. Some communications respecting this subject were also made to the Marquis, on whose influence in securing its adoption by his own government, much reliance was placed; and, in October, 1778, it was, for the first time, transmitted to General Washington, with a request that he would inclose it by the Marquis, with his observations on it, to Doctor Franklin.

We’ve already noted that Congress, driven by their desires rather than a careful assessment of their resources, had planned a second invasion of Canada last winter, led by the Marquis de Lafayette. However, since only the generals were prepared for this mission, it was set aside. Still, the plan seemed to be paused, not completely scrapped. The alliance with France reignited the desire to add that vast territory to the United States. That ongoing topic[Pg 79] was taken up again; Congress decides to launch an attack on Canada and other British territories in North America. By autumn, a detailed plan was developed for a joint assault by the allies on all British territories on the continent, along with the nearby islands of Cape Breton and Newfoundland. This plan was finalized around the time the Marquis de Lafayette received permission to return to his home country, and he was instructed to send it to Doctor Franklin, the U.S. minister at the Versailles court, with instructions to persuade the French government to accept it. Some discussions about this topic were also held with the Marquis, who was expected to play a key role in getting it approved by his own government. In October 1778, it was sent to General Washington for the first time, with a request that he forward it through the Marquis along with his thoughts on it to Doctor Franklin.

This very extensive plan of military operations for the ensuing campaign, prepared entirely in the cabinet, without consulting, so far as is known, a single military man, consisted of many parts.

This very detailed military operation plan for the upcoming campaign, created completely in the cabinet without consulting, as far as anyone knows, a single military person, consisted of many parts.

Two detachments, amounting, each, to sixteen hundred men, were to march from Pittsburg and Wyoming against Detroit, and Niagara.

Two groups, each consisting of sixteen hundred men, were set to march from Pittsburgh and Wyoming towards Detroit and Niagara.

A third body of troops, which was to be stationed on the Mohawk during the winter, and to be powerfully reinforced in the spring, was[Pg 80] to seize Oswego, and to secure the navigation of Lake Ontario with vessels to be constructed of materials to be procured in the winter.

A third group of troops, meant to be stationed on the Mohawk throughout the winter and significantly reinforced in the spring, was[Pg 80] set to take control of Oswego and ensure navigation of Lake Ontario with ships built from materials gathered during the winter.

A fourth corps was to penetrate into Canada by the St. Francis, and to reduce Montreal, and the posts on Lake Champlain, while a fifth should guard against troops from Quebec.

A fourth corps was set to invade Canada via the St. Francis and take Montreal as well as the posts on Lake Champlain, while a fifth was designated to prevent troops from Quebec.

Thus far America could proceed unaided by her ally. But, Upper Canada being reduced, another campaign would still be necessary for the reduction of Quebec. This circumstance would require that the army should pass the winter in Canada, and, in the mean time, the garrison of Quebec might be largely reinforced. It was therefore essential to the complete success of the enterprise, that France should be induced to take a part in it.

Thus far, America could manage without its ally. However, with Upper Canada taken, another campaign would still be needed to take Quebec. This situation would require the army to spend the winter in Canada, and in the meantime, the garrison in Quebec could be significantly reinforced. Therefore, to ensure the complete success of the mission, it was crucial to convince France to get involved.

The conquest of Quebec, and of Halifax, was supposed to be an object of so much importance to France as well as to the United States, that her aid might be confidently expected.

The conquest of Quebec and Halifax was considered so important to both France and the United States that her support could be confidently anticipated.

It was proposed to request his Most Christian Majesty to furnish four or five thousand troops, to sail from Brest, the beginning of May, under convoy of four ships of the line and four frigates; the troops to be clad as if for service in the West Indies, and thick clothes to be sent after them in August. A large American detachment was to act with this French army; and it was supposed that Quebec and Halifax might be reduced by the beginning or middle of[Pg 81] October. The army might then either proceed immediately against Newfoundland, or remain in garrison until the spring, when the conquest of that place might be accomplished.

It was suggested to ask His Most Christian Majesty to provide four or five thousand troops to set sail from Brest at the beginning of May, accompanied by four ships of the line and four frigates; the troops should be dressed as if for service in the West Indies, with warmer clothing to be sent after them in August. A large American detachment was to work with this French army, and it was believed that Quebec and Halifax could be taken by early to mid-October. The army could then either move directly against Newfoundland or stay in garrison until spring, when the conquest of that place could be completed.

It had been supposed probable that England would abandon the farther prosecution of the war on the continent of North America, in which case the government would have a respectable force at its disposal, the advantageous employment of which had engaged in part the attention of the Commander-in-chief. He had contemplated an expedition against the British posts in Upper Canada as a measure which might be eventually eligible, and which might employ the arms of the United States to advantage, if their troops might safely be withdrawn from the sea board. He had, however, considered every object of this sort as contingent. Having estimated the difficulties to be encountered in such an enterprise, he had found them so considerable as to hesitate on the extent which might safely be given to the expedition, admitting the United States to be evacuated by the British armies.

It was thought likely that England would stop pursuing the war on the North American continent, in which case the government would have a decent force available. The Commander-in-chief had partially focused on how to use this force effectively. He was thinking about a mission against the British posts in Upper Canada as a potentially good option that could benefit the United States if their troops could be safely pulled back from the coast. However, he viewed every objective of this kind as uncertain. After assessing the challenges that would come with such a mission, he found them significant enough to be cautious about how far the expedition could safely go, assuming the British armies would evacuate the United States.

In this state of mind, he received the magnificent plan already prepared by congress. He was forcibly struck with the impracticability of executing that part of it which was to be undertaken by the United States, should the British armies continue in their country; and with the serious mischief which would result to the common cause, as well from diverting so consider[Pg 82]able a part of the French force from other objects to one which was, in his opinion, so unpromising, as from the ill impression which would be made on the court and nation by the total failure of the American government to execute its part of a plan originating with itself; a failure which would, most probably, sacrifice the troops and ships employed by France.

In this state of mind, he received the impressive plan already laid out by Congress. He was hit hard by the impracticality of carrying out the part that was supposed to be handled by the United States, especially if the British armies remained in their territory. He recognized the serious damage that would come to the common cause, both from diverting a significant portion of the French forces from other goals to one that he believed was such a dead end, and from the negative impression it would create on the court and the nation due to the complete failure of the American government to fulfill its role in a plan that originated with them; a failure that would likely jeopardize the troops and ships used by France.

On comparing the naval force of England with that of France in the different parts of the world, the former appeared to him to maintain a decided superiority, and consequently to possess the power of shutting up the ships of the latter which might be trusted into the St. Lawrence. To suppose that the British government would not avail itself of this superiority on such an occasion, would be to impute to it a blind infatuation, or ignorance of the plans of its adversary, which could not be safely assumed in calculations of such serious import.

When he compared England's naval force to France's in various parts of the world, he found that England clearly had the upper hand. This meant they had the ability to block French ships that might venture into the St. Lawrence. To think that the British government wouldn't take advantage of this superiority in such a situation would imply that they were either blindly foolish or completely unaware of their opponent's plans, which is not a safe assumption to make in such serious matters.

General Washington urges reasons against the plan.

A plan too, consisting of so many parts, to be prosecuted both from Europe and America, by land and by water; which, to be successful, required such a harmonious co-operation of the whole, such a perfect coincidence of events, appeared to him to be exposed to too many accidents, to risk upon it interests of such high value.

A plan that involved so many elements, needing to be carried out from both Europe and America, by land and by sea; which, in order to succeed, required complete cooperation from everyone and perfect timing of events, seemed to him to be too vulnerable to unforeseen issues to risk such valuable interests on it.

 

George Washington

George Washington

 George Washington

George Washington

From the portrait by John Trumbull

From the portrait by John Trumbull

Colonel Trumbull, whose portraits of Washington, Hamilton, Jay, Adams, George Clinton and other Revolutionary contemporaries form a notable gallery, was General Washington's aide-de-camp at the outbreak of the War for Independence, and during its progress became a pupil of Benjamin West, in London. The news of André's execution fastened upon him the suspicion of being a spy, and he spent eight months in an English prison. Returning to America he painted this and other portraits of Washington, as well as a number of historical pictures, including the "Resignation of Washington at Annapolis," which hangs in the Capitol at Washington.

Colonel Trumbull, known for his portraits of Washington, Hamilton, Jay, Adams, George Clinton, and other figures from the Revolutionary era, was General Washington's aide-de-camp at the start of the War for Independence. As the war went on, he studied under Benjamin West in London. After the execution of André, he was suspected of being a spy and spent eight months in an English prison. Upon returning to America, he painted this and other portraits of Washington, along with several historical scenes, including the "Resignation of Washington at Annapolis," which is displayed in the Capitol in Washington.

 

In a long and serious letter to congress, he apologized for not obeying their orders to deliver the plan with his observations upon it to the Marquis; and, entering into a full investigation[Pg 83] of all its parts, demonstrated the mischiefs, and the dangers, with which it was replete. This letter was referred to a committee, whose report admits the force of the reasons urged by the Commander-in-chief against the expedition, and their own conviction that nothing important could be attempted unless the British armies should be withdrawn from the United States; and that, even in that event, the present plan was far too complex.

In a long and serious letter to Congress, he apologized for not following their orders to deliver the plan along with his comments on it to the Marquis. He conducted a thorough examination[Pg 83] of all its components and highlighted the issues and dangers it contained. This letter was sent to a committee, whose report acknowledges the validity of the arguments made by the Commander-in-chief against the expedition, as well as their belief that nothing significant could be attempted unless the British armies were withdrawn from the United States. Even then, they felt that the current plan was way too complicated.

Men, however, recede slowly and reluctantly from favourite and flattering projects on which they have long meditated; and the committee, in their report, proceeded to state the opinion that the posts held by the British in the United States would probably be evacuated before the active part of the ensuing campaign; and that, therefore, eventual measures for the expedition ought to be taken.

Men, however, slowly and hesitantly step back from their favorite and flattering plans they've been contemplating for a long time; and the committee, in their report, went on to express the opinion that the positions held by the British in the United States would likely be abandoned before the main part of the upcoming campaign; and that, therefore, necessary preparations for the expedition should be made.

This report concludes with recommending "that the general should be directed to write to the Marquis de Lafayette on that subject; and also to write to the minister of these states at the court of Versailles very fully, to the end that eventual measures may be taken, in case an armament should be sent from France to Quebec, for co-operating therewith, to the utmost degree, which the finances and resources of these states will admit."

This report ends by suggesting "that the general should be instructed to write to the Marquis de Lafayette about this issue; and also to communicate thoroughly with the minister of these states at the court of Versailles, so that appropriate actions can be taken if an armament is sent from France to Quebec, to support it as much as the finances and resources of these states allow."

This report also was approved by congress, and transmitted to the Commander-in-chief;[Pg 84] who felt himself greatly embarrassed by it. While his objections to the project retained all their force, he found himself required to open a correspondence for the purposes of soliciting the concurrence of France in an expedition he disapproved, and of promising a co-operation he believed to be impracticable. In reply to this communication, he said, "The earnest desire I have strictly to comply in every instance, with the views and instructions of congress, can not but make me feel the greatest uneasiness, when I find myself in circumstances of hesitation or doubt, with respect to their directions. But the perfect confidence I have in the justice and candour of that honourable body, emboldens me to communicate, without reserve, the difficulties which occur in the execution of their present order; and the indulgence I have experienced on every former occasion, induces me to imagine that the liberty I now take will not meet with disapprobation."

This report was also approved by Congress and sent to the Commander-in-Chief;[Pg 84] who found himself in a difficult position because of it. Even though he had strong objections to the project, he had to start a conversation to ask for France's support for an expedition he didn't agree with and promise cooperation that he thought was unrealistic. In response to this communication, he said, "My strong desire to fully comply with Congress's views and instructions makes me very uneasy when I find myself uncertain or doubtful about their directions. However, my complete confidence in the fairness and integrity of that honorable body encourages me to share openly the challenges I face in carrying out their current order, and the understanding I’ve received in the past leads me to believe that this approach will not be frowned upon."

After reviewing the report of the committee, and stating his objections to the plan, and the difficulties he felt in performing the duty assigned to him, he added, "But if congress still think it necessary for me to proceed in the business, I must request their more definitive and explicit instructions, and that they will permit me, previous to transmitting the intended despatches, to submit them to their determination.[Pg 85]

After looking over the committee’s report and expressing his concerns about the plan, as well as the challenges he faced in carrying out his assigned duties, he added, "But if Congress still believes it’s necessary for me to continue with this task, I need them to give me more clear and specific instructions, and to allow me, before sending the intended messages, to present them for their approval.[Pg 85]

"I could wish to lay before congress more minutely the state of the army, the condition of our supplies, and the requisites necessary for carrying into execution an undertaking that may involve the most serious events. If congress think this can be done more satisfactorily in a personal conference, I hope to have the army in such a situation before I can receive their answer, as to afford me an opportunity of giving my attendance."

"I would like to present to Congress in detail the state of the army, the condition of our supplies, and the requirements needed to carry out an operation that could lead to serious consequences. If Congress believes this can be better addressed in a personal meeting, I hope to have the army in a position before I get their response that will allow me the opportunity to attend."

Induces Congress to abandon it.

Congress acceded to his request of a personal interview; and, on his arrival in Philadelphia, a committee was appointed to confer with him, as well on this particular subject as on the general state of the army and of the country.

Congress agreed to his request for a personal interview; and, upon his arrival in Philadelphia, a committee was set up to discuss both this specific issue and the overall condition of the army and the country.

The result of these conferences was, that the expedition against Canada was entirely, though reluctantly,[15] given up, and every arrangement recommended by the Commander-in-chief, received the attention to which his judgment and experience gave all his opinions the fairest claim.

The outcome of these conferences was that the expedition against Canada was completely, though reluctantly, [15] abandoned, and every suggestion made by the Commander-in-chief was considered with the respect that his judgment and experience warranted for all his opinions.


CHAPTER IV.

Divisions in Congress.... Letters of General Washington on the state of public affairs.... Invasion of Georgia.... General Howe defeated by Colonel Campbell.... Savannah taken.... Sunbury surrenders.... Georgia reduced.... General Lincoln takes command of the Southern army.... Major Gardiner defeated by General Moultrie.... Insurrection of the Tories in South Carolina.... They are defeated by Colonel Pickens.... Ash surprised and defeated.... Moultrie retreats.... Prevost marches to Charleston.... Lincoln attacks the British at Stono Ferry unsuccessfully.... Invasion of Virginia.

Divisions in Congress.... Letters from General Washington about the state of public affairs.... Invasion of Georgia.... General Howe defeated by Colonel Campbell.... Savannah captured.... Sunbury surrenders.... Georgia falls.... General Lincoln takes charge of the Southern army.... Major Gardiner defeated by General Moultrie.... Tories rise up in South Carolina.... They are defeated by Colonel Pickens.... Ash surprised and beaten.... Moultrie retreats.... Prevost marches towards Charleston.... Lincoln attacks the British at Stono Ferry but fails.... Invasion of Virginia.

 

1779

After the relinquishment of that extensive plan of conquest which had been meditated against Canada, no other object seemed to call forth the energies of the nation, and a general languor appeared to diffuse itself through all the civil departments. The alliance with France was believed to secure independence; and a confidence that Britain could no longer prosecute the war with any hope of success—a confidence encouraged by communications from Europe—prevented those exertions which were practicable, but which it was painful to make. This temper was seen and deplored by the Commander-in-chief, who incessantly combated the opinion that Britain was about to relinquish the contest, and insisted that great and vigorous exertions on the part of the United States were still[Pg 87] necessary to bring the war to a successful termination.

After giving up that big plan to conquer Canada, it seemed like nothing else could inspire the nation’s efforts, and a general sense of laziness spread throughout all the civil departments. The alliance with France was thought to guarantee independence; and a growing belief that Britain could no longer continue the war successfully—encouraged by news from Europe—kept people from making the efforts that were possible, even though it was frustrating to do so. The Commander-in-chief saw and regretted this attitude, constantly arguing against the idea that Britain was about to give up the fight and insisting that significant and energetic efforts from the United States were still[Pg 87] necessary to achieve a successful end to the war.

It being no longer practicable to engage soldiers by voluntary enlistment, and government not daring to force men into the service for three years, or during the war, the vacant ranks were scantily supplied with drafts for nine, twelve, and eighteen months. A great proportion of the troops were discharged in the course of each year; and, except that the old officers remained, almost a new army was to be formed for every campaign.

It was no longer feasible to recruit soldiers through voluntary enlistment, and the government was hesitant to force men into service for three years or during the war, so the empty positions were barely filled with drafts for nine, twelve, and eighteen months. A large number of troops were discharged each year; and, aside from the old officers, a nearly new army had to be assembled for each campaign.

Although the Commander-in-chief pressed congress and the state governments continually and urgently, to take timely measures for supplying the places of those who were leaving the service, the means adopted were so slow and ineffectual in their operation, that the season for action never found the preparations completed; and the necessity of struggling against superior numbers was perpetual.

Although the Commander-in-chief constantly urged Congress and the state governments to take prompt action to replace those who were leaving the service, the methods used were so slow and ineffective that by the time action was needed, the preparations were never finished; and the need to fight against larger forces was continual.

The pleasing delusion that the war was over, to which the public mind delighted to surrender itself, made no impression on the judgment of Washington. Viewing objects through a more correct medium, he perceived that Great Britain had yet much to hope, and America much to fear, from a continuance of hostilities. He feared that the impression which the divisions, and apparent inertness of the United States had made on the British commissioners, would be[Pg 88] communicated to their government; and this consideration increased his anxiety in favour of early and vigorous preparations for the next campaign. Yet it was not until the 23d of January that congress passed the resolution, authorizing the Commander-in-chief to re-enlist the army, nor, until the 9th of March, that the requisition was made on the several states for their quotas. The bounty offered by the first resolution being found insufficient, the government was again under the necessity of resorting to the states. Thus, at a season when the men ought to have been in camp, the measures for raising them were still to be adopted.

The comforting illusion that the war was over, which the public eagerly embraced, didn’t affect Washington’s judgment. Looking at things more clearly, he realized that Great Britain still had a lot to gain, and America had a lot to lose, from continuing the conflict. He worried that the divisions and apparent inactivity of the United States would be[Pg 88] relayed to their government, and this thought heightened his concern for making early and strong preparations for the next campaign. However, it wasn’t until January 23rd that Congress passed the resolution allowing the Commander-in-chief to re-enlist the army, and not until March 9th that they made the request to the states for their contributions. The bounty offered by the first resolution proved to be inadequate, forcing the government to turn back to the states. Therefore, at a time when the troops should have been in camp, plans to recruit them were still being formulated.

About this period, several circumstances conspired to foment those pernicious divisions and factions in congress, which, in times of greater apparent danger, patriotism would have suppressed.

During this time, various factors came together to encourage those harmful divisions and factions in Congress, which, in times of greater apparent danger, patriotism would have suppressed.

The ministers of the United States, in Europe, had reciprocally criminated each other, and some of them had been recalled. Divisions in congress.Their friends in congress supported their respective interests with considerable animation; and, at length, Mr. Deane published a manifesto, in which he arraigned at the bar of the public, the conduct not only of those concerned in foreign negotiations, but of the members of Congress themselves.

The U.S. ministers in Europe had accused each other, and a few of them had been recalled. Divisions in Congress. Their supporters in Congress vigorously backed their interests, and eventually, Mr. Deane released a statement that publicly criticized not just those involved in foreign negotiations but also the members of Congress themselves.

The irritation excited by these and other contests was not a little increased by the appearance, in a New York paper, of an extract from[Pg 89] a letter written by Mr. Laurens, the president of congress, to Governor Huiston, of Georgia, which, during the invasion of that state, was found among his papers. In this letter, Mr. Laurens had unbosomed himself with the unsuspecting confidence of a person communicating to a friend the inmost operations of his mind. In a gloomy moment, he had expressed himself with a degree of severity, which even his own opinion, when not under the immediate influence of chagrin, would not entirely justify, and had reflected on the integrity and patriotism of members, without particularizing the individuals he designed to censure.

The irritation caused by these and other conflicts was increased by the publication in a New York newspaper of an excerpt from[Pg 89] a letter written by Mr. Laurens, the president of Congress, to Governor Huiston of Georgia, which was found among his papers during the invasion of that state. In this letter, Mr. Laurens had openly shared his thoughts with the trust of someone confiding in a friend. In a moment of gloom, he expressed himself with a level of severity that even he would not completely justify when not feeling upset, and he criticized the integrity and patriotism of members without naming the individuals he intended to criticize.

These altercations added much to the alarm with which General Washington viewed that security which had insinuated itself into the public mind; and his endeavours were unremitting to impress the same apprehensions on those who were supposed capable of removing the delusion. In his confidential letters to gentlemen of the most influence in the several states, he represented in strong terms the dangers which yet threatened the country, and earnestly exhorted them to a continuance of those sacrifices and exertions which he still deemed essential to the happy termination of the war. The dissensions in congress; the removal of individuals of the highest influence and character from the councils of the nation to offices in the respective states; the depreciation of the currency; the destructive[Pg 90] spirit of speculation which the imaginary gain produced by this depreciation had diffused throughout the Union; a general laxity of principles; and an unwillingness to encounter personal inconvenience for the attainment of the great object, in pursuit of which so much blood and treasure had been expended; were the rocks on which, he apprehended, the state vessel might yet split, and to which he endeavoured, incessantly, to point the attention of those whose weight of political character enable them to guide the helm.

These conflicts heightened the concern with which General Washington viewed the false sense of security that had taken hold of the public. He worked tirelessly to instill the same fears in those who could potentially dispel the misconception. In his private letters to influential leaders in the various states, he vividly described the ongoing dangers facing the country and earnestly urged them to continue making the sacrifices and efforts he believed were crucial for successfully ending the war. The disagreements in Congress, the transfer of highly respected individuals from national leadership roles to positions in their respective states, the decline in the value of currency, the damaging culture of speculation driven by the unrealistic profits from this depreciation that spread throughout the Union, a general looseness of principles, and a reluctance to face personal hardship for the achievement of a significant goal, for which so much blood and resources had been spent, were the challenges he feared could ultimately cause the nation to fail. He continuously sought to draw the attention of those with considerable political influence to this peril.

Letters from General Washington on the state of public affairs.

"I am particularly desirous of a free communication of sentiments with you at this time," says the General in a letter written to a gentleman of splendid political talents, "because I view things very differently, I fear, from what people in general do, who seem to think the contest at an end, and that to make money, and get places, are the only things now remaining to be done. I have seen without despondency, even for a moment, the hours which America has styled her gloomy ones; but I have beheld no day since the commencement of hostilities, when I have thought her liberties in such imminent danger as at present. Friends and foes seem now to combine to pull down the goodly fabric we have hitherto been raising at the expense of so much time, blood, and treasure."

"I really want to share my thoughts with you right now," the General writes in a letter to a man with impressive political skills, "because I have a very different perspective than most people, who seem to think the battle is over, and that making money and getting positions are the only things left to do. I have never felt hopeless, even for a moment, during the times that America has called her darkest; however, I haven't seen a day since the start of the conflict when I believed our freedoms were in such serious danger as they are now. Both friends and enemies seem to be working together to tear down the wonderful structure we've been building, at such a cost of time, blood, and resources."

After censuring with some freedom the prevailing opinions of the day, he added, "To me[Pg 91] it appears no unjust simile to compare the affairs of this great continent to the mechanism of a clock, each state representing some one or other of the smaller parts of it, which they are endeavouring to put in fine order, without considering how useless and unavailing their labour is, unless the great wheel, or spring, which is to set the whole in motion, is also well attended to, and kept in good order. I allude to no particular state, nor do I mean to cast reflections upon any one of them, nor ought I, it may be said, to do so on their representatives; but, as it is a fact too notorious to be concealed, that congress is rent by party; that much business of a trifling nature and personal concernment, withdraws their attention from matters of great national moment at this critical period; when it is also known that idleness and dissipation take place of close attention and application, no man who wishes well to the liberties of this country, and desires to see its rights established, can avoid crying out—where are our men of abilities? Why do they not come forth to save their country? Let this voice, my dear sir, call upon you, Jefferson, and others. Do not, from a mistaken opinion that we are to sit down under our vine and our own fig-tree, let our hitherto noble struggle end in ignominy. Believe me when I tell you there is danger of it. I have pretty good reasons for thinking that administration, a little while ago, had resolved to give the matter[Pg 92] up, and negotiate a peace with us upon almost any terms; but I shall be much mistaken if they do not now, from the present state of our currency, dissensions, and other circumstances, push matters to the utmost extremity. Nothing I am sure will prevent it but the intervention of Spain, and their disappointed hope from Russia."

After freely criticizing the popular beliefs of the time, he added, "To me[Pg 91], it’s not an unfair comparison to liken the affairs of this great continent to the workings of a clock, with each state representing one of the smaller components, trying to get their part working well, without realizing how pointless their efforts are unless the main wheel or spring that drives everything is also properly cared for and maintained. I'm not pointing fingers at any specific state, nor am I trying to criticize any of their representatives; however, it’s a well-known fact that Congress is divided by party lines, that they often focus on trivial issues and personal concerns instead of the significant national matters at this crucial time. When we also see that idleness and carelessness replace focus and hard work, anyone who truly cares about the liberties of this country and wants to see its rights secured can’t help but wonder—where are our capable leaders? Why aren't they stepping up to save our country? Let this message, my dear sir, be a call to you, Jefferson, and others. Don’t let a misunderstanding lead us to believe we're meant to sit comfortably under our vine and fig tree while our once-great struggle ends in disgrace. Believe me when I say there’s a real risk of that happening. I have good reasons to believe that not long ago, the administration decided to give up and negotiate peace with us on almost any terms; but I would be very wrong if I didn't think they wouldn’t now, given our current currency issues, conflicts, and other factors, push things to the absolute limit. The only thing that I’m sure could prevent that is intervention from Spain and their broken hopes from Russia."

The circumstances in the situation and temper of America, which made so deep an impression on the Commander-in-chief, operated with equal force on the British commissioners, and induced them to think that, by continuing the war, more favourable terms than were now demanded might be obtained. They seem to have taken up the opinion that the mass of the people, fatigued and worn out by the complicated calamities of the struggle, sincerely desired an accommodation on the terms proposed by Great Britain; and that the increasing difficulties resulting from the failure of public credit, would induce them to desert congress, or compel that body to accede to those terms. These opinions, when communicated to the government, most probably contributed to protract the war.

The situation and mood in America, which had a strong impact on the Commander-in-chief, also influenced the British commissioners. They believed that by continuing the war, they could secure better terms than those currently being offered. They seemed to think that the majority of the people, exhausted and drained by the ongoing struggles, genuinely wanted a settlement based on Great Britain's proposals. They believed that the growing challenges from the breakdown of public credit would lead the people to turn away from Congress or force that group to agree to those proposals. These views, when shared with the government, likely helped to lengthen the war.

The narrative of military transactions will now be resumed.

The story of military operations will now continue.

The British arms had heretofore been chiefly directed against the northern and middle states. The strongest parts of the American continent were pressed by their whole force; and, with the exception of the attempt on Sullivan's island in[Pg 93] 1776, no serious design had yet been manifested to make an impression in the south. Entertaining the most confident hopes of recovering all the colonies, the British government had not prosecuted the war with a view to partial conquest. But the loss of the army commanded by Burgoyne, the alliance of America with France, and the unexpected obstinacy with which the contest was maintained, had diminished their confidence; and, when the pacific propositions made in 1778 were rejected, the resolution seems to have been taken to change, materially, the object of their military operations; and, maintaining possession of the islands of New York, to direct their arms against the southern states, on which, it was believed, a considerable impression might be made.

The British military had mainly focused on the northern and central states up until now. They had put their full force against the strongest regions of the American continent, and aside from the attempt on Sullivan's Island in[Pg 93] 1776, there hadn’t been any serious plans to make an impact in the south. The British government was still holding onto strong hopes of regaining all the colonies and hadn’t been fighting the war with the intent of partial conquest. However, the loss of the army led by Burgoyne, the alliance between America and France, and the unexpected determination with which the conflict was being fought had weakened their confidence. When the peaceful proposals made in 1778 were turned down, it seemed they decided to significantly change their military strategy; they planned to keep control of the New York islands and turn their focus toward the southern states, where they believed they could make a significant impact.

It was not unreasonable to suppose that the influence of this impression might extend northward; but, however this might be, the actual conquest and possession of several states would, when negotiations for a general peace should take place, give a complexion to those negotiations, and afford plausible ground for insisting to retain territory already acquired. The most active and interesting operations therefore of the succeeding campaigns, were in the southern states.

It wasn't unreasonable to think that the impact of this impression could reach north; but regardless, the actual conquest and control of several states would, when negotiations for a general peace began, shape those discussions and provide a solid reason for insisting on keeping the territory already gained. Therefore, the most active and engaging actions in the following campaigns took place in the southern states.

Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who sailed from the Hook about the last of November, 1778, escorted by a small squadron commanded by Com[Pg 94]modore Hyde Parker, reached the isle of Tybee, near the Savannah, on the 23d of December; and, in a few days, the fleet and the transports passed the bar, and anchored in the river.

Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who left the Hook around the end of November 1778, accompanied by a small squadron led by Commodore Hyde Parker, arrived at Tybee Island, near Savannah, on December 23rd. A few days later, the fleet and the transport ships went past the bar and anchored in the river.

The command of the southern army, composed of the troops of South Carolina and Georgia, had been committed to Major General Robert Howe, who, in the course of the preceding summer, had invaded East Florida.[16] The diseases incident to the climate made such ravages among his raw soldiers, that, though he had scarcely seen an enemy, he found himself compelled to hasten out of the country with considerable loss. After this disastrous enterprise, his army, consisting of between six and seven hundred continental troops, aided by a few hundred militia, had encamped in the neighbourhood of the town of Savannah, situated on the southern bank of the river bearing that name. The country about the mouth of the river is one tract of deep marsh, intersected by creeks and cuts of water, impassable for troops at any time of the tide, except over causeways extending through the sunken ground.

The command of the southern army, made up of troops from South Carolina and Georgia, was given to Major General Robert Howe, who had invaded East Florida the previous summer. The diseases common to the climate took a heavy toll on his inexperienced soldiers, and even though he barely encountered an enemy, he was forced to leave the area with significant losses. After this failed campaign, his army, which included around six to seven hundred continental troops and a few hundred militia, set up camp near the town of Savannah, located on the southern bank of the river of the same name. The land around the mouth of the river is a vast swamp, crisscrossed by creeks and waterways, making it impossible for troops to cross at any tide, except through causeways built over the marshy ground.

Invasion of Georgia.

Without much opposition, Lieutenant Colonel Campbell effected a landing on the 29th, about three miles below the town; upon which Howe formed his line of battle. His left was secured by the river; and along the whole extent of his[Pg 95] front was a morass which stretched to his right, and was believed by him to be impassable for such a distance, as effectually to secure that wing.

Without much resistance, Lieutenant Colonel Campbell landed on the 29th, about three miles downstream from the town, after which Howe organized his line of battle. His left side was protected by the river, and across the entire length of his[Pg 95] front was a swamp that extended to his right, which he thought was impossible to cross for such a distance, effectively securing that side.

After reconnoitring the country, Colonel Campbell advanced on the great road leading to Savannah; and, about three in the afternoon, appeared in sight of the American army. While making dispositions to dislodge it, he accidentally fell in with a negro, who informed him of a private path leading through the swamp, round the right of the American lines to their rear. Determining to avail himself of this path, he detached a column under Sir James Baird, which entered the morass unperceived by Howe.

After surveying the area, Colonel Campbell moved toward the main road to Savannah; and around three in the afternoon, he spotted the American army. While planning to dislodge it, he unexpectedly encountered a Black man who told him about a hidden path through the swamp that went around the right side of the American lines to their rear. Deciding to use this path, he sent a group led by Sir James Baird, which entered the swamp without being noticed by Howe.

General Howe defeated by the British under Colonel Campbell, who takes possession of Savannah.

As soon as Sir James emerged from the swamp, he attacked and dispersed a body of Georgia militia, which gave the first notice to the American general of the danger which threatened his rear. At the same instant, the British troops in his front were put in motion, and their artillery began to play upon him. A retreat was immediately ordered; and the continental troops were under the necessity of running across a plain, in front of the corps which had been led into their rear by Sir James Baird, who attacked their flanks with great impetuosity, and considerable effect. The few who escaped, retreated up the Savannah; and, crossing that river at Zubly's ferry, took refuge in South Carolina.[Pg 96]

As soon as Sir James came out of the swamp, he charged at a group of Georgia militia, which was the first warning the American general received about the threat to his rear. At the same time, the British troops in front of him started moving, and their artillery opened fire. A retreat was quickly ordered; the Continental troops had to run across a plain, right in front of the forces that Sir James Baird had sent to their rear, attacking their sides with a lot of force and impact. The few who managed to escape retreated up the Savannah River; after crossing at Zubly's ferry, they found safety in South Carolina.[Pg 96]

The victory was complete, and decisive in its consequences. About one hundred Americans were either killed in the field, or drowned in attempting to escape through a deep swamp. Thirty-eight officers, and four hundred and fifteen privates, were taken. Forty-eight pieces of cannon, twenty-three mortars, the fort with all its military-stores, a large quantity of provisions collected for the use of the army, and the capital of Georgia, fell into the hands of the conqueror. These advantages were obtained at the expense of only seven killed, and nineteen wounded.

The victory was complete and had significant consequences. About one hundred Americans were either killed on the battlefield or drowned while trying to escape through a deep swamp. Thirty-eight officers and four hundred and fifteen enlisted soldiers were captured. Forty-eight cannons, twenty-three mortars, the fort with all its military supplies, a large amount of food collected for the army, and the capital of Georgia were taken by the victor. These gains were achieved at the cost of just seven killed and nineteen wounded.

No military force now remained in Georgia, except the garrison of Sunbury, whose retreat to South Carolina was cut off. All the lower part of that state was occupied by the British, who adopted measures to secure the conquest they had made. The inhabitants were treated with a lenity as wise as it was humane. Their property was spared, and their persons protected. To make the best use of victory, and of the impression produced by the moderation of the victors, a proclamation was issued, inviting the inhabitants to repair to the British standard, and offering protection to those who would return to their allegiance.

No military force was left in Georgia, except for the garrison in Sunbury, which couldn't retreat to South Carolina. The British occupied the lower part of the state and took steps to secure their conquest. The locals were treated with a kindness that was both smart and compassionate. Their property was protected, and their safety was ensured. To make the most of their victory and the favorable impression created by their moderation, a proclamation was issued, inviting the residents to join the British side and promising protection to those who would return to their loyalty.

The effect of these measures did not disappoint those who adopted them. The inhabitants flocked in great numbers to the royal standard; military corps for the protection of the country[Pg 97] were formed; and posts were established for a considerable distance up the river.

The impact of these measures met the expectations of those who implemented them. The residents gathered in large numbers around the royal standard; military units for the defense of the nation[Pg 97] were created; and positions were set up along a substantial stretch of the river.

Sunbury surrenders to General Prevost.

The northern frontier of Georgia being supposed to be settled into a state of quiet, Colonel Campbell turned his attention towards Sunbury, and was about to proceed against that place, when he received intelligence that it had surrendered to General Prevost.

The northern border of Georgia was thought to be at peace, so Colonel Campbell focused on Sunbury and was about to move against it when he learned that it had surrendered to General Prevost.

Sir Henry Clinton had ordered that officer to co-operate from East Florida, with Colonel Campbell. On hearing that the troops from the north were off the coast, he entered the southern frontier of Georgia, and invested Sunbury, which, after a slight resistance, surrendered at discretion. The State of Georgia reduced.Having placed a garrison in the fort, he proceeded to Savannah, took command of the army, and detached Colonel Campbell with eight hundred regulars and a few provincials to Augusta, which fell without resistance, and thus the whole state of Georgia was reduced.

Sir Henry Clinton had ordered that officer to work with Colonel Campbell from East Florida. When he learned that the troops from the north were off the coast, he entered the southern border of Georgia and laid siege to Sunbury, which surrendered after a brief resistance. Georgia has reduced. After placing a garrison in the fort, he moved on to Savannah, took command of the army, and sent Colonel Campbell with eight hundred regulars and a few provincial soldiers to Augusta, which fell without any fight, completing the conquest of the entire state of Georgia.

While the expedition conducted by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell was preparing at New York, congress was meditating the conquest of East Florida.

While Lieutenant Colonel Campbell’s expedition was getting ready in New York, Congress was considering the takeover of East Florida.

The delegates of South Carolina and Georgia, anxious that a general of more experience than Howe should command in the southern department, had earnestly pressed that he should be recalled, and that General Lincoln, whose military reputation was high, should be appointed to succeed him. In compliance with their solicita[Pg 98]tions, Howe was ordered in September, 1778, to repair to the head quarters of General Washington, and Lincoln was directed to proceed immediately to Charleston, in South Carolina, in order to take command in the southern department. General Lincoln takes the command of the southern army.In pursuance of this resolution, General Lincoln repaired to Charleston, where he found the military affairs of the country in a state of utter derangement. Congress had established no continental military chest in the southern department. This omission produced a dependence on the government of the state for supplies to move the army on any emergency, and consequent subjection of the troops in continental service to its control. The militia, though taken into continental service, considered themselves as subject only to the military code of the state. These regulations threatened to embarrass all military operations, and to embroil the general with the civil government.

The delegates from South Carolina and Georgia, concerned that a more experienced general than Howe should lead in the southern region, strongly urged his recall and recommended General Lincoln, who had a solid military reputation, to take his place. Following their requests, Howe was ordered in September 1778 to report to General Washington's headquarters, and Lincoln was instructed to go straight to Charleston, South Carolina, to take command in the southern region. General Lincoln takes command of the southern army. Acting on this decision, General Lincoln arrived in Charleston, where he discovered that the military situation was completely disorganized. Congress had not set up a continental military chest in the southern department. This oversight led to a reliance on the state government for supplies needed to mobilize the army during emergencies, which in turn subjected the continental troops to state control. The militia, despite being enlisted in the continental service, viewed themselves as only accountable to the state’s military code. These issues threatened to complicate military operations and create conflicts between the general and the civil government.

While Lincoln was labouring to make arrangements for the ensuing campaign, he received intelligence of the appearance of the enemy off the coast. The militia of North Carolina, amounting to two thousand men, commanded by Generals Ash and Rutherford, had already reached Charleston; but were unarmed, and congress had been unable to provide magazines in this part of the Union. These troops were, therefore, entirely dependent on South Carolina for every military equipment; and arms[Pg 99] were not delivered to them until it was too late to save the capital of Georgia.

While Lincoln was working on plans for the upcoming campaign, he got word that the enemy had appeared off the coast. The North Carolina militia, consisting of two thousand men and led by Generals Ash and Rutherford, had already arrived in Charleston; however, they were unarmed, and Congress had been unable to supply munitions in this part of the Union. As a result, these troops were completely reliant on South Carolina for all their military gear, and the arms[Pg 99] were not delivered to them until it was too late to save the capital of Georgia.

So soon as it was ascertained that the British fleet had entered the Savannah river, General Lincoln proceeded with the utmost expedition towards the scene of action. On his march, he received intelligence of the victory gained over General Howe; and was soon afterwards joined by the remnant of the defeated army at Purysburg, a small town on the north side of the Savannah, where he established his head quarters.

As soon as it was confirmed that the British fleet had entered the Savannah River, General Lincoln hurried to the battlefield. During his march, he learned about the victory over General Howe; not long after, he was joined by the remaining members of the defeated army at Purysburg, a small town on the north side of the Savannah, where he set up his headquarters.

The regular force commanded by General Prevost must have amounted to at least three thousand effective men; and this number was increased by irregulars who had joined him in Georgia. The American army rather exceeded three thousand six hundred men, of whom not quite two thousand five hundred were effective. Something more than one thousand were continental troops, part of whom were new levies; the rest were militia.

The regular troop led by General Prevost had to number at least three thousand active soldiers; this count was boosted by irregulars who had joined him in Georgia. The American army was slightly over three thousand six hundred strong, with just under two thousand five hundred being effective. More than a thousand were continental troops, some of whom were new recruits, while the rest were militia.

The theatre of action was so well adapted to defensive war, that, although General Prevost was decidedly superior to his adversary, it was difficult to extend his conquests into South Carolina. Major Gardiner defeated by General Moultrie.With the view of entering that state by the way of the sea coast, he detached Major Gardiner with about two hundred men, to take possession of the island of Port Royal. That officer, soon after reaching his place of destina[Pg 100]tion, was attacked by General Moultrie, and compelled to retreat with considerable loss. This repulse checked the designs of Prevost on South Carolina.

The battlefield was so well suited for defensive warfare that, even though General Prevost was significantly stronger than his opponent, it was challenging to push his victories into South Carolina. Major Gardiner was defeated by General Moultrie. To try to enter that state via the coastline, he sent Major Gardiner with about two hundred men to take control of Port Royal Island. However, once Gardiner reached his destination, he was attacked by General Moultrie and forced to retreat with substantial losses. This setback halted Prevost's plans for South Carolina.

From the commencement of the war, a considerable proportion of the western inhabitants of the three southern states had been attached to the royal cause. The first successes of the British were soon communicated to them, and they were invited to assemble and join the king's standard at Augusta. Insurrection of the Tories in South Carolina, who are defeated by Colonel Pickens.About seven hundred embodied themselves on the frontiers of South Carolina, and began their march to that place. They were overtaken by Colonel Pickens at the head of the neighbouring militia, near Kittle Creek, and defeated with considerable loss. Colonel Boyd, their leader, was among the slain; and several of those who escaped were apprehended, tried, and five of them executed as traitors. About three hundred reached the British out-posts, and joined the royal standard. This defeat broke the spirits of the Tories for a time; and preserved quiet in the west.

From the start of the war, a significant number of people in the three southern states aligned themselves with the royal cause. The early victories of the British were quickly shared with them, and they were encouraged to gather and rally to the king's flag at Augusta. Tory uprising in South Carolina, defeated by Colonel Pickens. About seven hundred of them gathered on the frontiers of South Carolina and began their march to that location. They were caught by Colonel Pickens and the nearby militia near Kittle Creek and were defeated with heavy losses. Colonel Boyd, their leader, was among those killed, and several of the survivors were captured, tried, and five were executed as traitors. About three hundred made it to the British outposts and joined the royal forces. This defeat dampened the spirits of the Tories for a while and maintained peace in the west.

As the American army gained strength by reinforcements of militia, General Lincoln began to contemplate offensive operations. A detachment had been stationed nearly opposite to Augusta under General Ash, and he purposed joining that officer so soon as a sufficient force could be collected, and attempting to recover the upper parts of Georgia. Before he was able to execute[Pg 101] this plan, General Prevost withdrew his troops from Augusta to Hudson's Ferry. Ash was then ordered to cross the Savannah, and take post near the confluence of Briar Creek with that river. This camp was thought unassailable. Its left was covered by a deep swamp, and by the Savannah. The front was secured by Briar Creek, which is unfordable several miles, and makes an acute angle with the river.

As the American army grew stronger with reinforcements from the militia, General Lincoln started to think about launching offensive operations. A unit had been stationed almost directly across from Augusta under General Ash, and he planned to join that officer as soon as enough troops could be gathered to try to reclaim the upper parts of Georgia. Before he could carry out[Pg 101] this plan, General Prevost pulled his troops back from Augusta to Hudson's Ferry. Ash was then ordered to cross the Savannah River and set up camp near where Briar Creek meets that river. This camp was considered nearly impossible to attack. Its left side was protected by a deep swamp and the Savannah River, while the front was secured by Briar Creek, which cannot be crossed for miles and forms a sharp angle with the river.

Having determined to dislodge the Americans from this position, Prevost kept up the attention of General Lincoln by the semblance of a design to cross the Savannah; and, at the same time amused General Ash with a feint on his front, while Lieutenant Colonel Prevost made a circuit of about fifty miles, and, crossing Briar Creek fifteen miles above the ground occupied by Ash, came down, unperceived and unsuspected, on his rear. Ash surprised and defeated by Prevost.Ash, unused to the stratagems of war, was so completely engaged by the manœuvres in his front, that Lieutenant Colonel Prevost was almost in his camp before any intelligence of his approach was received. The continental troops under General Elbert were drawn out to oppose him, and commenced the action with great gallantry; but most of the militia threw away their arms and fled in confusion. As they precipitated themselves into the swamp and swam the river, not many of them were taken. General Elbert and his small band of continental troops, aided by one regiment of North Carolina[Pg 102] militia, were soon overpowered by numbers, and the survivors were compelled to surrender themselves prisoners of war. The killed and taken amounted to between three and four hundred men. General Elbert and Colonel M'Intosh were among the latter. But the loss sustained by the American army was much more considerable. The dispersed militia returned to their homes; and not more than four hundred and fifty of them could be reassembled.

Having decided to drive the Americans out of this position, Prevost kept General Lincoln engaged by pretending to plan a crossing of the Savannah. At the same time, he distracted General Ash with a deceptive front, while Lieutenant Colonel Prevost made a circuit of about fifty miles. He crossed Briar Creek fifteen miles above where Ash was stationed and approached Ash’s rear without being noticed. Ash was taken by surprise and defeated by Prevost. Ash, not accustomed to military tricks, was so focused on the actions in front of him that Lieutenant Colonel Prevost was nearly in his camp before he was aware of his approach. The Continental troops under General Elbert moved out to confront Prevost and started the fight bravely, but most of the militia discarded their weapons and fled in panic. As they plunged into the swamp and swam across the river, few were captured. General Elbert and his small group of Continental troops, with help from one regiment of North Carolina militia, were quickly overwhelmed by the numbers against them, and the survivors had to surrender as prisoners of war. The total casualties included between three and four hundred men. General Elbert and Colonel M'Intosh were among those taken. However, the losses experienced by the American army were much greater. The scattered militia returned to their homes, with no more than four hundred and fifty managing to regroup.

This victory was supposed to give the British such complete possession of Georgia, that a proclamation was issued the succeeding day by General Prevost, establishing civil government, and appointing executive and judicial officers to administer it.

This victory was meant to give the British total control over Georgia, so the next day, General Prevost issued a proclamation establishing a civil government and appointing executive and judicial officials to run it.

These disasters, instead of terrifying South Carolina into submission, animated that state to greater exertions. Mr. John Rutledge, a gentleman of great talents and decision, was elected governor; and the legislature passed an act empowering him and the council to do every thing that appeared to him and them necessary for the public good. All the energies of the state were drawn forth. The militia were called out in great numbers, and the laws for their government were rendered more severe.[17]

These disasters, instead of scaring South Carolina into submission, motivated the state to put in even more effort. Mr. John Rutledge, a man of great talent and determination, was elected governor; and the legislature passed a law giving him and the council the authority to do whatever they deemed necessary for the public good. All of the state's energies were mobilized. The militia was called up in large numbers, and the regulations governing them were made stricter.[17]

Thus reinforced, General Lincoln resumed his plan for recovering the upper parts of Georgia;[Pg 103] and marched the main body of his army up the Savannah.

Thus reinforced, General Lincoln continued his plan to reclaim the upper regions of Georgia;[Pg 103] and marched the main part of his army up the Savannah.

This river was now swelled greatly beyond its usual limits; and the swamps, marshes, and creeks which intersect the country being full, seemed to present an almost impassable barrier to an invading army. A small military force being deemed sufficient to arrest the progress of an enemy through a route which, if at all practicable, was so difficult, about eight hundred of the state militia, aided by two hundred continental troops, were left with General Moultrie for the defence of the country.

This river had now risen significantly beyond its usual banks; and the swamps, marshes, and creeks that crisscross the area were full, creating an almost impassable barrier for an invading army. It was believed that a small military force would be enough to stop the enemy's advance through a route that, if it could be used at all, was very challenging. About eight hundred state militia, supported by two hundred continental troops, were left with General Moultrie to defend the area.

Aware of the importance of this movement, and hoping to recall Lincoln by alarming him for the safety of Charleston, Prevost compels Moultrie to retreat.General Prevost suddenly crossed the Savannah with three thousand men; and, advancing rapidly on General Moultrie, obliged him to retreat with precipitation. The militia could not be prevailed on to defend the passes with any degree of firmness; and Moultrie, instead of drawing aid from the surrounding country, sustained an alarming diminution of numbers by desertion.

Aware of how crucial this movement was, and wanting to alert Lincoln about the safety of Charleston, Prevost makes Moultrie retreat. General Prevost quickly crossed the Savannah River with three thousand men and moved rapidly toward General Moultrie, forcing him to retreat in a hurry. The militia wouldn’t commit to defending the passes with any real strength, and instead of seeking help from the nearby areas, Moultrie faced a worrying drop in forces due to desertion.

On the passage of the river by Prevost, an express had been despatched to Lincoln with the intelligence. Persuaded that the British general could meditate no serious attempt on Charleston, and that the real object was to induce him to abandon the enterprise in which he was engaged, he detached a reinforcement of three hundred[Pg 104] light troops to aid Moultrie, and crossing the Savannah himself, continued his march down the south side of that river towards the capital of Georgia.

On the river crossing by Prevost, a message was sent to Lincoln with the news. Believing that the British general had no real plans to seriously attack Charleston and that the actual goal was to make him give up on his current mission, he sent a reinforcement of three hundred[Pg 104] light troops to help Moultrie. He then crossed the Savannah himself and continued his march down the south side of the river toward the capital of Georgia.

Though the original purpose of General Prevost had been limited to the security of Georgia, the opposition he encountered was so much less than he had expected; the tenour of the country was so apparent; the assurances of those who flocked to his standard; of the general disposition of the people to terminate the calamities of war by submission, were so often and so confidently repeated, Prevost marches to Charleston.that he was emboldened to extend his views, and to hazard the continuation of his march to Charleston.

Though General Prevost originally intended to focus only on securing Georgia, the resistance he faced was much less than he expected. It was clear what the general mood of the country was; the support from those who rallied around him and the overall willingness of the people to end the hardships of war through submission were frequently and confidently expressed, Prevost marches to Charleston. so he felt encouraged to broaden his objectives and take the risk of continuing his march to Charleston.

On receiving intelligence of this threatening aspect of affairs in South Carolina, Lincoln recrossed the Savannah, and hastened to the relief of that state.

Upon learning about the alarming situation in South Carolina, Lincoln crossed back over the Savannah and hurried to help the state.

The situation of Charleston was extremely critical. The inhabitants, entirely unapprehensive of an attack by land, had directed their whole attention to its protection against an invasion by sea. Had Prevost continued his march with the rapidity with which it was commenced, the place must have fallen. But, after having gained more than half the distance, he halted, and consumed two or three days in deliberating on his future measures. While his intelligence determined him to proceed, and assured him of a state of things which rendered success almost[Pg 105] certain, that state of things was rapidly changing. Fortifications on the land side were commenced and prosecuted with unremitting labour; the neighbouring militia were drawn into the town; the reinforcements detached by General Lincoln, and the remnant of the legion of Pulaski arrived; and the governor also entered the city, at the head of some troops which had been stationed at Orangeburg.

The situation in Charleston was extremely critical. The residents, completely unaware of a land attack, had focused all their efforts on defending against a sea invasion. If Prevost had continued his march as quickly as he started, the city would have fallen. However, after covering more than half the distance, he stopped and spent two or three days debating his next steps. While his information urged him to move forward and assured him of a situation that made success almost[Pg 105]certain, that situation was changing rapidly. Fortifications on the land side were started and worked on tirelessly; local militias were called into the city; the reinforcements sent by General Lincoln and the remaining troops of the Pulaski legion arrived; and the governor also came into the city with some troops that had been stationed at Orangeburg.

The next morning Prevost crossed Ashly River, and encamped just without cannon shot of the works. The town was summoned to surrender, and the day was spent in sending and receiving flags. The neutrality of South Carolina during the war, leaving the question whether that state should finally belong to Great Britain or the United States, to be settled in the treaty of peace, was proposed by the garrison, and rejected by Prevost; who required that they should surrender themselves prisoners of war. This proposition being also rejected, the garrison prepared to sustain an assault. But an attempt to carry the works by storm was too hazardous to be made; and Prevost came to the prudent resolution of decamping that night, and recrossing Ashly River.

The next morning, Prevost crossed the Ashly River and set up camp just outside cannon range of the fortifications. The town was called to surrender, and the day was spent exchanging flags. The garrison proposed the idea of South Carolina remaining neutral during the war, leaving the decision of whether it would ultimately belong to Great Britain or the United States to the peace treaty, but Prevost rejected it. He insisted that they surrender as prisoners of war. This suggestion was also turned down, so the garrison got ready to defend against an attack. However, launching a storm assault on the works was deemed too risky, and Prevost wisely decided to pack up that night and cross back over the Ashly River.

The British army passed into the island of St. James, and thence to that of St. John's, which lies south of Charleston harbour; soon after which General Lincoln encamped in the neighbourhood, so as to confine them in a great degree[Pg 106] to the island they occupied. This island is separated from the main land by an inlet, to which the name of Stono River has been given; and the communication is preserved by a ferry. A British post was established upon the main land at this ferry, and works were thrown up in front for its defence. When Prevost commenced his retreat, and the troops were moving from island to island, the occasion seemed a fair one for attacking it. Only eight hundred men, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Maitland, defended it; but a large corps still lay on the island. To prevent these troops from supporting those on the main land, General Moultrie, who commanded in Charleston, was ordered to pass over a body of militia into James's island, who should amuse the enemy in St. John's, while a real attack should be made on the post at the ferry. Lincoln attacks the British at the ferry but without success.About seven in the morning, General Lincoln commenced this attack with about one thousand men; and continued it with great spirit, until he perceived that strong reinforcements were crossing over from the island; when he called off his troops, and retreated, unmolested, to his old ground.

The British army moved into St. James Island and then to St. John's Island, which is south of Charleston harbor. Soon after, General Lincoln set up camp nearby to largely confine them to the island they were occupying. This island is separated from the mainland by an inlet known as Stono River, and travel between the two is maintained by a ferry. A British outpost was established on the mainland at this ferry, with defensive works built in front of it. When Prevost began his retreat and the troops were shifting from island to island, it seemed like a good opportunity to attack. Only eight hundred men, led by Lieutenant Colonel Maitland, defended it, but a larger force was still on the island. To prevent those troops from helping those on the mainland, General Moultrie, who was in charge in Charleston, was ordered to send a group of militia to James Island to distract the enemy at St. John's while a real attack was launched on the ferry post. Lincoln strikes at the British at the ferry, but it's unsuccessful. Around seven in the morning, General Lincoln began this attack with about one thousand men and fought fiercely until he noticed strong reinforcements crossing from the island. At that point, he withdrew his troops and retreated safely to his previous position.

General Moultrie had been unable to execute that part of the plan which devolved on him. Boats were not in readiness to convey the men into James's island, and consequently the feint on St. John's was not made.[Pg 107]

General Moultrie couldn't carry out his part of the plan. The boats weren’t ready to take the men to James's Island, so the distraction at St. John's didn’t happen.[Pg 107]

The loss of the Americans, in killed and wounded, amounted to twenty-four officers, and one hundred and twenty-five privates. That of the British was stated to be rather less.

The Americans lost twenty-four officers and one hundred twenty-five soldiers, both dead and injured. The British casualties were reported to be slightly lower.

Three days after this action, the posts at Stono and St. John's were evacuated. The heat now became too excessive for active service; and the British army, after establishing a post on the island contiguous to Port Royal and St. Helena, retired into Georgia and St. Augustine.

Three days after this event, the posts at Stono and St. John's were evacuated. The heat became too intense for active service; and the British army, after setting up a post on the island next to Port Royal and St. Helena, retreated to Georgia and St. Augustine.

The American militia dispersed, leaving General Lincoln at the head of about eight hundred men; with whom he retired to Sheldon, where his primary object was to prepare for the next campaign, which it was supposed would open in October.

The American militia broke up, leaving General Lincoln in charge of about eight hundred men, with whom he withdrew to Sheldon. His main goal was to get ready for the next campaign, which was expected to begin in October.

The invasion of the southern states wore so serious an aspect, that Bland's regiment of cavalry, and the remnant of that lately Baylor's, now commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Washington, with the new levies of Virginia, were ordered to repair to Charleston, and to place themselves under the command of General Lincoln. The execution of these orders was for a time suspended by the invasion of Virginia.

The invasion of the southern states seemed so serious that Bland's cavalry regiment and the remnants of Baylor's, now led by Lieutenant Colonel Washington, along with the new recruits from Virginia, were ordered to head to Charleston and report to General Lincoln. However, the execution of these orders was temporarily put on hold due to the invasion of Virginia.

An expedition against that state had been concerted in the spring between Sir Henry Clinton and Sir George Collier, the Commander-in-chief of the British naval force on the American station. Invasion of Virginia by General Matthews.The land troops assigned to this service were commanded by General Matthews. The[Pg 108] transports, on board of which they embarked, were convoyed by the Admiral in person. On the 9th of May the fleet entered the Chesapeake, and the next day anchored in Hampton Roads.

An expedition against that state was planned in the spring between Sir Henry Clinton and Sir George Collier, the Commander-in-chief of the British naval force in America. Invasion of Virginia by General Matthews. The land troops assigned to this mission were led by General Matthews. The [Pg 108] transports, where they boarded, were escorted by the Admiral himself. On May 9th, the fleet arrived in the Chesapeake, and the following day anchored in Hampton Roads.

Virginia had raised a regiment of artillery for the performance of garrison duty in the state, which had been distributed along the eastern frontier; and slight fortifications had been constructed in the most important situations, which were defensible on the side of the water, but were not tenable against a military force strong enough to act on land. Fort Nelson, on the west side of Elizabeth river, garrisoned by about one hundred and fifty soldiers, commanded by Major Matthews, was designed to protect the towns of Norfolk and Portsmouth, which were on each side of the river just above it; and the town of Gosport, which lies still higher up on a point of land intervening between two branches of the river. Norfolk and Portsmouth were places of the most considerable commerce in Virginia. Large supplies for the army were deposited in them; and the state government had established at Gosport a marine yard, where ships of war and other vessels were building, for which naval stores were collected to a very great amount. The destruction of these vessels and stores, constituted the principal object of General Matthews.

Virginia had organized a regiment of artillery for garrison duty in the state, which was stationed along the eastern frontier. Minor fortifications were built in key locations that were defensible on the water side, but they couldn't withstand a strong military force advancing from land. Fort Nelson, located on the west side of the Elizabeth River, was manned by about one hundred fifty soldiers under Major Matthews. It was meant to protect the towns of Norfolk and Portsmouth, which are situated on either side of the river just above the fort, as well as the town of Gosport, located further upstream on a piece of land between two branches of the river. Norfolk and Portsmouth were significant commercial hubs in Virginia. They stored large supplies for the army, and the state government established a marine yard at Gosport, where warships and other vessels were being built, for which a substantial amount of naval supplies were gathered. General Matthews's main objective was to destroy these vessels and supplies.

On the morning of the tenth, the fleet entered Elizabeth river, and the troops were landed[Pg 109] about three miles below the fort, without opposition. Foreseeing that the works would be attacked the next morning on the land side, the garrison evacuated the fort in the night, and took refuge in a deep and extensive swamp, called the Dismal, which could not be penetrated without difficulty, even by single persons.

On the morning of the tenth, the fleet entered the Elizabeth River, and the troops were landed[Pg 109] about three miles downstream from the fort, without any resistance. Anticipating that the fort would be attacked from land the next morning, the garrison evacuated during the night and found refuge in a vast, deep swamp known as the Dismal, which was hard to navigate, even for individuals.

The whole sea-board, on the south side of James' river, being now in possession of General Matthews, he fixed his head quarters at Portsmouth, whence small parties were detached to Norfolk, Gosport, Kemps' landing, and Suffolk, where military and naval stores to a great amount, and several vessels richly laden, fell into his hands.

The entire coastline south of the James River is now under General Matthews' control. He set up his headquarters in Portsmouth, from where he sent small teams to Norfolk, Gosport, Kemps' Landing, and Suffolk. They seized a large quantity of military and naval supplies, along with several heavily loaded ships.

This invasion was of short duration. General Matthews, after destroying the magazines which had been collected in the small towns near the coast, and the vessels in the rivers, was ordered by Sir Henry Clinton to return to New York, where he arrived towards the last of May.

This invasion didn't last long. General Matthews, after taking out the supplies gathered in the small towns along the coast and the ships in the rivers, was ordered by Sir Henry Clinton to go back to New York, where he arrived in late May.

The Admiral and General were both so impressed with the importance of Portsmouth as a permanent station, that they united in representing to the Commander-in-chief the advantages to be derived from keeping possession of it. But, in the opinion of Sir Henry Clinton, the army did not at that time admit of so many subdivisions; and, with a view to more interesting objects, Portsmouth was evacuated.

The Admiral and General were both really impressed with how important Portsmouth was as a permanent station, so they worked together to explain to the Commander-in-chief the benefits of holding onto it. However, Sir Henry Clinton believed that the army couldn't handle that many divisions at that time, and with an eye on more pressing matters, Portsmouth was abandoned.


CHAPTER V.

Discontents in a part of the American army.... Letter from General Washington on the subject.... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Indian settlement.... Expedition against the Indians meditated.... Fort Fayette surrendered to the British.... Invasion of Connecticut.... General Wayne storms Stony Point.... Expedition against Penobscot.... Powles Hook surprised by Major Lee.... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot.... Of the Count D'Estaing.... Siege of Savannah.... Unsuccessful attempt to storm that place.... Siege raised.... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown.... Spain offers her mediation to the belligerents.... Declares war against England.... Letter from General Washington to congress respecting the annual formation of the army.... The army goes into winter quarters.

Discontent within part of the American army.... Letter from General Washington on the matter.... Colonel Van Schaick destroys an Indian settlement.... There's a planned expedition against the Indians.... Fort Fayette was surrendered to the British.... Invasion of Connecticut.... General Wayne attacks Stony Point.... Expedition against Penobscot.... Powles Hook is surprised by Major Lee.... Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot.... Regarding Count D'Estaing.... Siege of Savannah.... Unsuccessful attempt to take that place.... Siege lifted.... Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown.... Spain offers to mediate between the warring parties.... Declares war on England.... Letter from General Washington to Congress about the annual formation of the army.... The army goes into winter quarters.

 

1779

The barbarities committed by the Indians, in the course of the preceding year, on the inhabitants of the western frontiers, had added motives of mingled resentment and humanity to those of national interest, for employing a larger force in the protection of that part of the Union than had heretofore been devoted to it.

The brutal acts carried out by the Native Americans over the past year against the people living on the western frontiers had created a mix of anger and compassion, alongside national interests, which called for a greater military presence to protect that area of the Union than ever before.

General Washington had always believed that it was impossible to defend the immense western frontier by any chain of posts which could be established; and that the country would be protected much more certainly by offensive than by defensive war. His plan was to penetrate into the heart of the Indian settlements with a force competent to the destruction of their[Pg 111] towns; and also to reduce the British post at Niagara, which gave its possessors an almost irresistible influence over the six nations. This plan constituted one of the various subjects of conference with the committee of congress in Philadelphia, and received the entire approbation of that body.

General Washington always believed that it was impossible to defend the vast western frontier with any chain of posts that could be set up; he thought the country would be better protected through offensive rather than defensive warfare. His strategy was to move into the heart of the Indian settlements with a force strong enough to destroy their[Pg 111] towns and also to take control of the British post at Niagara, which gave its owners almost unstoppable influence over the six nations. This plan was one of several topics discussed with the committee of congress in Philadelphia and received full approval from that group.

The state governments also took a strong interest in the protection of their western settlements. Connecticut, New York, and Pennsylvania, applied, severally, to congress, urging the adoption of such vigorous measures as would secure the frontiers against a repetition of the horrors which had been already perpetrated. These papers were referred to the committee which had been appointed to confer with General Washington, in conformity with whose report it was resolved, "that the Commander-in-chief be directed to take efficient measures for the protection of the inhabitants, and chastisement of the savages."

The state governments were also very concerned about protecting their western settlements. Connecticut, New York, and Pennsylvania each reached out to Congress, urging them to adopt strong measures to secure the frontiers against a repeat of the horrors that had already occurred. These requests were sent to the committee assigned to confer with General Washington, and based on their report, it was decided that "the Commander-in-chief should be directed to take effective actions to protect the inhabitants and punish the attackers."

The Six Nations had made some advances towards acquiring the comforts of civilized life. Several comfortable houses were to be seen in their populous villages; and their fertile fields and orchards yielded an abundant supply of corn and fruit. Some few of their towns were attached to the United States; but, in general, they were under the influence of the British. Many of the loyalists had taken refuge among them, and had added to their strength without[Pg 112] diminishing their ferocity. It was determined to lead a force into these villages, sufficient to overpower any numbers they could possibly bring into the field, and to destroy the settlements they had made. To guard against reinforcements from Canada, means were used to inspire that colony with fears for itself.

The Six Nations had made some progress toward enjoying the comforts of modern life. Several well-built homes were visible in their busy villages, and their fertile fields and orchards provided plenty of corn and fruit. A few of their towns had joined the United States, but overall, they were under British influence. Many loyalists found refuge among them, strengthening their numbers without reducing their fierceness. It was decided to send a force into these villages that would be strong enough to overcome any troops they could muster and to destroy the settlements they had established. To prevent reinforcements from Canada, efforts were made to instill fears for their safety within that colony.

As the army destined for this expedition was about to move, alarming symptoms of discontent appeared in a part of it. The Jersey brigade, which had been stationed during the winter at Elizabethtown, was ordered early in May, to march by regiments. Discontents in a part of the American army.This order was answered by a letter from General Maxwell, stating that the officers of the first regiment had delivered a remonstrance to their Colonel, addressed to the legislature of the state, declaring that, unless their complaints on the subjects of pay and support should obtain the immediate attention of that body, they were, at the expiration of three days, to be considered as having resigned; and requesting the legislature, in that event, to appoint other officers to succeed them. They declared, however, their readiness to make every preparation for obeying the orders which had been given, and to continue their attention to the regiment until a reasonable time should elapse for the appointment of their successors. "This," added the letter of General Maxwell, "is a step they are extremely unwilling to take, but it is such as I make no doubt they will all[Pg 113] take; nothing but necessity—their not being able to support themselves in time to come, and being loaded with debts contracted in time past, could have induced them to resign at so critical a juncture."

As the army preparing for this mission was about to move out, troubling signs of discontent emerged in part of it. The Jersey brigade, which had been based in Elizabethtown over the winter, was ordered in early May to march by regiments. Dissatisfaction within a section of the American army. This order was met with a letter from General Maxwell, stating that the officers of the first regiment had submitted a complaint to their Colonel, addressed to the state legislature, saying that unless their concerns about pay and support received immediate attention, they would consider themselves to have resigned after three days, and requested that the legislature appoint new officers in that case. However, they expressed their willingness to prepare for obeying the orders they had received and to continue taking care of the regiment until a reasonable time had passed for the appointment of their successors. "This," General Maxwell added in his letter, "is a step they are very reluctant to take, but I have no doubt they will all [Pg 113] do so; only necessity—their inability to support themselves in the future and being burdened with past debts—could have pushed them to resign at such a critical moment."

The intelligence conveyed in this letter made a serious impression on the Commander-in-chief. He was strongly attached to the army and to its interests; had witnessed its virtue and its sufferings; and lamented sincerely its present distresses. The justice of the complaints made by the officers could no more be denied, than the measure they had adopted could be approved. Relying on their patriotism and on his own influence, he immediately wrote a letter to General Maxwell, to be laid before them, in which, mingling the sensibility of a friend with the authority of a general, he addressed to their understanding and to their love of country, observations calculated to invite their whole attention to the consequences which must result from the step they were about to take.

The intelligence conveyed in this letter left a strong impression on the Commander-in-Chief. He was deeply connected to the army and its interests; he had witnessed its bravery and its hardships; and he genuinely felt for its current struggles. The justice of the complaints made by the officers could not be denied, just as the action they had taken could not be approved. Trusting in their patriotism and his own influence, he quickly wrote a letter to General Maxwell, to be presented to them, in which, blending the empathy of a friend with the authority of a general, he aimed his remarks at their understanding and their love for their country, encouraging them to fully consider the consequences of the action they were about to take.

Letter from General Washington on this subject.

"The patience and perseverance of the army," proceeds the letter, "have been, under every disadvantage, such as to do them the highest honour both at home and abroad, and have inspired me with an unlimited confidence of their virtue, which has consoled me amidst every perplexity and reverse of fortune, to which our affairs, in a struggle of this nature, were necessarily exposed. Now that we have made so great a progress to[Pg 114] the attainment of the end we have in view, so that we can not fail without a most shameful desertion of our own interests, any thing like a change of conduct would imply a very unhappy change of principles, and a forgetfulness, as well of what we owe to ourselves, as to our country. Did I suppose it possible this could be the case, even in a single regiment of the army, I should be mortified and chagrined beyond expression. I should feel it as a wound given to my own honour, which I consider as embarked with that of the army at large. But this I believe to be impossible. Any corps that was about to set an example of the kind, would weigh well the consequences; and no officer of common discernment and sensibility would hazard them. If they should stand alone in it, independent of other consequences, what would be their feelings on reflecting that they had held themselves out to the world in a point of light inferior to the rest of the army. Or if their example should be followed, and become general, how could they console themselves for having been the foremost in bringing ruin and disgrace upon their country. They would remember that the army would share a double portion of the general infamy and distress, and that the character of an American officer would become as infamous as it is now glorious.

"The patience and perseverance of the army," the letter continues, "have been commendable despite every disadvantage, earning them great respect both at home and abroad. This has filled me with immense confidence in their integrity, which has comforted me in the face of every challenge and setback our efforts, in a struggle like this, inevitably faced. Now that we have made significant progress toward achieving our goals, any change in our conduct would amount to a shameful abandonment of our own interests. Such a shift would suggest a troubling change in our principles and a disregard for what we owe to ourselves and our country. If I thought this could happen, even in just one regiment of the army, I would be deeply disappointed and upset. It would feel like a personal affront to my honor, which I believe is tied to the honor of the entire army. But I find this scenario hard to believe. Any unit contemplating such an example would carefully consider the consequences, and no officer with any sense or sensitivity would take that risk. If they acted alone, they would have to reckon with how they presented themselves to the world as lesser than the rest of the army. And if their example became widespread, how could they reconcile their role in bringing ruin and disgrace upon our country? They would remember that the army would bear a double burden of infamy and hardship, and that the reputation of an American officer would sink from glorious to infamous."

"I confess the appearances in the present instance are disagreeable, but I am convinced they[Pg 115] seem to mean more than they really do. The Jersey officers have not been outdone by any others in the qualities either of citizens or soldiers; and I am confident, no part of them would seriously intend any thing that would be a stain on their former reputation. The gentlemen can not be in earnest; they have only reasoned wrong about the means of obtaining a good end, and, on consideration, I hope and flatter myself they will renounce what must appear to be improper. At the opening of a campaign, when under marching orders for an important service, their own honour, duty to the public and to themselves, and a regard to military propriety, will not suffer them to persist in a measure which would be a violation of them all. It will even wound their delicacy, coolly to reflect that they have hazarded a step, which has an air of dictating terms to their country, by taking advantage of the necessity of the moment.

"I admit the situation looks bad right now, but I really believe it means more than it actually does. The Jersey officers are just as capable as anyone else, both as citizens and as soldiers; and I'm sure none of them would intentionally do something that would tarnish their reputation. They can't be serious about this; they've just reasoned incorrectly about how to achieve a good outcome, and I hope, upon reflection, they'll reconsider what must seem inappropriate. At the start of a campaign, when getting ready for an important mission, their honor, their responsibility to the public and to themselves, and a sense of military standards won’t allow them to stick with a course of action that goes against all of that. It would even hurt their pride to think they’ve taken a step that suggests they are dictating terms to their country by exploiting the urgency of the moment."

"The declaration they have made to the state, at so critical a time, that unless they obtain relief in the short period of three days, they must be considered out of the service, has very much that aspect; and the seeming relaxation of continuing until the state can have a reasonable time to provide other officers, will be thought only a superficial veil. I am now to request that you will convey my sentiments to the gentlemen concerned, and endeavour to make them sensible that they are in an error. The service for which[Pg 116] the regiment was intended will not admit of delay. It must at all events march on Monday morning, in the first place to camp, and farther directions will be given when it arrives. I am sure I shall not be mistaken in expecting a prompt and cheerful obedience."

"The declaration they made to the state at such a critical time—that unless they receive assistance within three days, they'll have to be considered out of service—seems quite serious. The apparent willingness to stay on until the state has enough time to find other officers will likely be seen as just a superficial cover. I now ask that you share my thoughts with the relevant gentlemen and try to make them see that they are mistaken. The service for which[Pg 116] the regiment was intended cannot afford any delays. The regiment must march on Monday morning, first to the camp, and further instructions will be given upon arrival. I believe I’m justified in expecting prompt and willing compliance."

The representations of this letter did not completely produce the desired effect. The officers did not recede from their claims. In an address to the Commander-in-chief, they expressed their unhappiness that any act of theirs should give him pain, but proceeded to justify the step they had taken. Repeated memorials had been presented to their legislature, which had been received with promises of attention, but had been regularly neglected. "At length," said they, "we have lost all confidence in our legislature. Reason and experience forbid that we should have any. Few of us have private fortunes; many have families who already are suffering every thing that can be received from an ungrateful country. Are we then to suffer all the inconveniences, fatigues, and dangers of a military life, while our wives and our children are perishing for want of common necessaries at home;—and that without the most distant prospect of reward, for our pay is now only nominal? We are sensible that your excellency can not wish nor desire this from us.

The statements in this letter did not fully achieve the intended outcome. The officers did not back down from their demands. In a message to the Commander-in-chief, they expressed their regret that any of their actions should cause him distress, but they went on to justify the decision they made. They had sent repeated requests to their legislature, which were met with promises of consideration but consistently ignored. "Finally," they said, "we have lost all trust in our legislature. Reason and experience make it clear that we shouldn't have any. Few of us have personal wealth; many have families who are already suffering everything from an ungrateful country. Are we really expected to endure all the hardships, exhaustion, and dangers of military life while our wives and children are suffering from lack of basic necessities at home—and with no real chance of reward since our pay is basically nonexistent now? We know your excellency can't want or expect this from us.

"We are sorry that you should imagine we meant to disobey orders. It was and still is our[Pg 117] determination to march with our regiment, and to do the duty of officers until the legislature should have a reasonable time to appoint others, but no longer.

"We're sorry you think we intended to disobey orders. It has always been our[Pg 117] determination to march with our regiment and fulfill our duties as officers until the legislature has had a reasonable amount of time to appoint others, but not beyond that."

"We beg leave to assure your Excellency, that we have the highest sense of your ability and virtues;—that executing your orders has ever given us pleasure;—that we love the service, and we love our country;—but when that country gets so lost to virtue and justice as to forget to support its servants, it then becomes their duty to retire from its service."

"We respectfully assure you, Your Excellency, that we hold your abilities and virtues in the highest regard; executing your orders has always been a pleasure for us; we love our service and our country; but when that country strays so far from virtue and justice that it forgets to support its servants, it then becomes their duty to step back from that service."

This letter was peculiarly embarrassing. To adopt a stern course of proceeding might hazard the loss of the Jersey line, an event not less injurious to the service, than painful to himself. To take up the subject without doing too much for the circumstances of the army, would be doing too little for the occasion. He therefore declined taking any other notice of the letter, than to declare through General Maxwell that, while they continued to do their duty in conformity with the determination they had expressed, he should only regret the part they had taken, and should hope they would perceive its impropriety.

This letter was really awkward. Taking a strict approach could risk losing the Jersey line, which would be just as damaging to the mission as it would be upsetting for him. Addressing the issue without considering the army's situation would mean doing too little for what was needed. So, he chose not to respond to the letter in any other way than to communicate through General Maxwell that as long as they kept doing their duty in line with their stated intentions, he would only feel disappointed about the stance they had taken and hope they would realize how inappropriate it was.

The legislature of New Jersey, alarmed at the decisive step taken by the officers, was at length induced to pay some attention to their situation; they consenting, on their part, to withdraw their remonstrance. In the meantime, they continued to perform their duty; and their[Pg 118] march was not delayed by this unpleasant altercation.

The legislature of New Jersey, concerned about the strong action taken by the officers, finally decided to pay attention to their situation; the officers agreed to withdraw their complaint. In the meantime, they kept doing their job, and their[Pg 118] march wasn't held up by this unpleasant disagreement.

In communicating this transaction to congress, General Washington took occasion to remind that body of his having frequently urged the absolute necessity of some general and adequate provision for the officers of the army. "I shall only observe," continued the letter, "that the distresses in some corps are so great, either where they were not until lately attached to any particular state, or where the state has been less provident, that the officers have solicited even to be supplied with the clothing destined for the common soldiery, coarse and unsuitable as it was. I had not power to comply with the request.

In updating Congress about this transaction, General Washington took the opportunity to remind them that he had often emphasized the urgent need for a comprehensive provision for the army officers. "I will only note," he continued in the letter, "that the hardships faced by some units are so severe, either because they were only recently assigned to a specific state or because that state has not provided adequately, that the officers have even asked to be given the clothing meant for regular soldiers, although it was rough and inappropriate. I did not have the authority to fulfill their request."

"The patience of men animated by a sense of duty and honour, will support them to a certain point, beyond which it will not go. I doubt not congress will be sensible of the danger of an extreme in this respect, and will pardon my anxiety to obviate it."

"The patience of men driven by a sense of duty and honor can take them only so far, beyond which it has its limits. I believe Congress will recognize the risks of going too far in this matter and will understand my concern to prevent it."

Colonel Van Schaick surprises and destroys one of the Indian settlements.

Before the troops destined for the grand expedition were put in motion, an enterprise of less extent was undertaken, which was completely successful. A plan for surprising the towns of the Onondagas, one of the nearest of the hostile tribes, having been formed by General Schuyler, and approved by the Commander-in-chief, Colonel Van Schaick, assisted by Lieutenant Colonel Willet, and Major Cochran, marched[Pg 119] from fort Schuyler on the morning of the 19th of April, at the head of between five and six hundred men; and, on the third day, reached the point of destination. The whole settlement was destroyed, after which the detachment returned to fort Schuyler without the loss of a single man. For this handsome display of talents as a partisan, the thanks of congress were voted to Colonel Van Schaick, and the officers and soldiers under his command.

Before the troops set to embark on the major expedition were deployed, a smaller operation was carried out that turned out to be completely successful. A plan to surprise the Onondaga towns, one of the closest hostile tribes, was created by General Schuyler and approved by the Commander-in-Chief. Colonel Van Schaick, supported by Lieutenant Colonel Willet and Major Cochran, marched[Pg 119] from Fort Schuyler on the morning of April 19th, leading about five to six hundred men; and on the third day, they arrived at their destination. The entire settlement was destroyed, after which the detachment returned to Fort Schuyler without losing a single man. For this impressive display of skill as a partisan, Congress voted to thank Colonel Van Schaick and the officers and soldiers under his command.

Expedition against the Indians meditated.

The cruelties exercised by the Indians in the course of the preceding year, had given a great degree of importance to the expedition now meditated against them; and the relative military strength and situation of the two parties, rendered it improbable that any other offensive operations could be carried on by the Americans in the course of the present campaign. The army under the command of Sir Henry Clinton, exclusive of the troops in the southern department, was computed at between sixteen and seventeen thousand men. The American army, the largest division of which lay at Middlebrook, under the immediate command of General Washington, was rather inferior to that of the British in real strength. The grand total, except those in the southern and western country, including officers of every description, amounted to about sixteen thousand. Three thousand of these were in New England under the command of General Gates; and the remaining thirteen[Pg 120] thousand were cantoned on both sides the North River. The bare statement of numbers, must show the incompetency of the American army to the expulsion of the British from either New York or Rhode Island. On their part, therefore, the plan of the campaign was, necessarily, defensive; and the hazards and difficulties attending the execution of even a defensive plan were considerable.

The brutal actions taken by the Native Americans over the past year had made the upcoming expedition against them very significant. Given the relative military strength and positions of both sides, it was unlikely that the Americans could carry out any other offensive operations during this campaign. The army led by Sir Henry Clinton, not counting the troops in the southern region, was estimated to be between sixteen and seventeen thousand strong. The American army, the largest part of which was stationed at Middlebrook under General Washington, was somewhat smaller than the British in actual strength. The total number, excluding those in the southern and western regions and including all types of officers, was about sixteen thousand. Three thousand of these were in New England under General Gates, while the remaining thirteen[Pg 120] thousand were positioned on both sides of the North River. The simple fact of the numbers clearly demonstrated that the American army was not capable of forcing the British out of either New York or Rhode Island. For them, the campaign plan had to be defensive, and even implementing a defensive strategy came with significant risks and challenges.

Independent of an extensive coast, at all places accessible to the invading army, the Hudson, penetrating deep into the country which was to be the theatre of action, gave great advantages in their military operations to those who commanded the water.

Independent of a long coastline, at all points accessible to the invading army, the Hudson River, extending deep into the territory that would be the site of conflict, provided significant advantages in military operations to those who controlled the water.

After the destruction of forts Clinton and Montgomery in 1777, it had been determined to construct the fortifications intended for the future defence of the North River, at West Point, a position which, being more completely embosomed in the hills, was deemed more defensible. The works had been prosecuted with unremitting industry, but were far from being completed.

After the destruction of Forts Clinton and Montgomery in 1777, it was decided to build the fortifications needed for the future defense of the North River at West Point, a location that, being more surrounded by hills, was considered more defensible. The construction had been carried out with constant effort, but it was still far from finished.

Some miles below West Point, about the termination of the Highlands, is King's Ferry, where the great road, affording the most convenient communication between the middle and eastern states, crosses the North River. The ferry is completely commanded by the two opposite points of land. That on the west side, a[Pg 121] rough and elevated piece of ground, is denominated Stony Point; and the other, on the east side, a flat neck of land projecting far into the water, is called Verplank's Point. The command of King's Ferry was an object worth the attention of either army; and Washington had comprehended the points which protect it within his plan of defence for the Highlands. A small but strong work, termed fort Fayette, was completed at Verplank's, and was garrisoned by a company commanded by Captain Armstrong. The works on Stony Point were unfinished. As the season for active operations approached, Sir Henry Clinton formed a plan for opening the campaign with a brilliant coup de main up the North River; and, towards the latter end of May, made preparations for the enterprise.

Some miles below West Point, near the end of the Highlands, is King's Ferry, where the main road providing the easiest connection between the middle and eastern states crosses the North River. The ferry is completely controlled by the two nearby pieces of land. On the west side, a rough and elevated area is known as Stony Point; on the east side, a flat stretch of land that juts far into the water is called Verplank's Point. Controlling King's Ferry was important for both armies, and Washington had included the protective points in his defense plan for the Highlands. A small but strong fort, called Fort Fayette, was completed at Verplank's and was manned by a company led by Captain Armstrong. The works on Stony Point were still under construction. As the time for active operations neared, Sir Henry Clinton devised a plan to start the campaign with a striking coup de main up the North River; towards the end of May, he began preparations for the operation.

These preparations were immediately communicated to General Washington, who was confident that the British general meditated an attack on the forts in the highlands, or designed to take a position between those forts and Middlebrook, in order to interrupt the communication between the different parts of the American army, to prevent their reunion, and to beat them in detail. Measures were instantly taken to counteract either of these designs. The intelligence from New York was communicated to Generals Putnam and M'Dougal, who were ordered to hold themselves in readiness to march; and, on the 29th of May, the army[Pg 122] moved by divisions from Middlebrook towards the highlands. May.On the 30th, the British army, commanded by Sir Henry Clinton in person, and convoyed by Sir George Collier, proceeded up the river; and General Vaughan, at the head of the largest division, landed next morning, about eight miles below Verplank's. The other division, under the particular command of General Patterson, but accompanied by Sir Henry Clinton, advancing farther up, landed on the west side within three miles of Stony Point.

These preparations were quickly shared with General Washington, who believed that the British general was planning to attack the forts in the highlands or intended to position themselves between those forts and Middlebrook. This would disrupt communication between different parts of the American army, prevent their reunion, and defeat them in smaller groups. Measures were promptly taken to counter these plans. The information from New York was given to Generals Putnam and M'Dougal, who were instructed to be ready to march; and on May 29th, the army[Pg 122] moved in divisions from Middlebrook towards the highlands. May. On the 30th, the British army, led by Sir Henry Clinton himself and escorted by Sir George Collier, moved up the river; and General Vaughan, leading the largest division, landed the next morning about eight miles below Verplank's. The other division, under General Patterson but accompanied by Sir Henry Clinton, continued farther up, landing on the west side within three miles of Stony Point.

That place being immediately abandoned, General Patterson took possession of it on the same afternoon. He dragged some heavy cannon and mortars to the summit of the hill in the course of the night; and, June 1.at five next morning, opened a battery on fort Fayette, at the distance of about one thousand yards. During the following night, two galleys passed the fort, and, anchoring above it, prevented the escape of the garrison by water; while General Vaughan invested it closely by land. Fort Fayette surrendered to the British.No means of defending the fort, or of saving themselves remaining, the garrison became prisoners of war. Immediate directions were given for completing the works at both posts, and for putting Stony Point, in particular, in a strong state of defence.

That place was quickly abandoned, and General Patterson took control of it that same afternoon. He moved heavy cannons and mortars to the top of the hill during the night, and at five the next morning, he opened a battery on Fort Fayette from about a thousand yards away. The following night, two galleys went past the fort and anchored upstream, blocking the garrison's escape by water, while General Vaughan surrounded it from land. Fort Fayette gave up to the British. With no way to defend the fort or save themselves, the garrison became prisoners of war. Immediate instructions were given to complete the works at both posts, especially to fortify Stony Point.

It is scarcely supposable that the views of Sir Henry Clinton in moving up the river, were limited to this single acquisition. The means employed were so disproportioned to the object,[Pg 123] as to justify a belief that he contemplated farther and more important conquests. Whatever may have been his plans, the measures of precaution taken by Washington counteracted their execution; and before Clinton was in a situation to proceed against West Point, General M'Dougal was so strengthened, and the American army took such a position on the strong grounds about the Hudson, that the enterprise became too hazardous to be farther prosecuted.

It’s hard to believe that Sir Henry Clinton's decision to move up the river was just about this one goal. The resources he used were so excessive for what he aimed to achieve that it suggests he was planning for more significant victories. Whatever his intentions were, Washington's precautions thwarted their success; by the time Clinton was ready to act against West Point, General M'Dougal had been reinforced, and the American army took positions on the strong terrain around the Hudson, making the mission too risky to continue.

After completing the fortifications on both sides the river, at King's Ferry, Sir Henry Clinton placed a strong garrison in each fort, and proceeded down the river to Philipsburg. The relative situation of the hostile armies presenting insuperable obstacles to any grand operation, they could be employed offensively only on detached expeditions. Connecticut from its contiguity to New York, and its extent of sea coast, was peculiarly exposed to invasion. The numerous small cruisers which plied in the Sound, to the great annoyance of British commerce, and the large supplies of provisions drawn from the adjacent country, for the use of the continental army, furnished great inducements to Sir Henry Clinton to direct his enterprises particularly against that state. He also hoped to draw General Washington from his impregnable position on the North River into the low country, and thus obtain an opportunity[Pg 124] of striking at some part of his army, or of seizing the posts, which were the great object of the campaign. July.
Invasion of Connecticut.
With these views, he planned an expedition against Connecticut, the command of which was given to Governor Tryon, who reached New Haven bay on the 5th of July, with about two thousand six hundred men.

After finishing the fortifications on both sides of the river at King's Ferry, Sir Henry Clinton stationed a strong garrison in each fort and moved down the river to Philipsburg. The positioning of the opposing armies made it nearly impossible to conduct any major operations, so they could only act offensively on separate missions. Connecticut, due to its closeness to New York and its long coastline, was especially vulnerable to invasion. The many small cruisers that sailed in the Sound, which greatly frustrated British trade, along with the large amounts of provisions coming from the nearby region for the continental army, gave Sir Henry Clinton strong reasons to focus his efforts on that state. He also hoped to lure General Washington from his solid position on the North River down into the low country, thus creating an opportunity[Pg 124] to attack part of his army or capture key posts, which were the main goal of the campaign. July.
Connecticut invasion.
With these aims, he organized an expedition against Connecticut, which was led by Governor Tryon, who arrived in New Haven bay on July 5th with about two thousand six hundred men.

General Washington was at the time on the lines, examining in person the condition of the works on Stony and Verplank's Points; in consequence of which, the intelligence which was transmitted to head quarters that the fleet had sailed, could not be immediately communicated to the governor of Connecticut, and the first intimation which that state received of its danger, was given by the appearance of the enemy. The militia assembled in considerable numbers with alacrity; but the British effected a landing, and took possession of the town. After destroying the military and naval stores found in the place, they re-embarked, and proceeded westward to Fairfield, which was reduced to ashes. The good countenance shown by the militia at this place is attested by the apology made by General Tryon for the wanton destruction of private property, which disgraced his conduct. "The village was burnt," he says, "to resent the fire of the rebels from their houses, and to mask our retreat."

General Washington was on the front lines, personally inspecting the state of the defenses at Stony and Verplank's Points. Because of this, the information about the fleet sailing couldn't be quickly communicated to the governor of Connecticut. The first warning that state received about its danger was the arrival of the enemy. The militia quickly gathered in large numbers, but the British landed and took control of the town. After destroying the military and naval supplies found there, they re-embarked and moved west to Fairfield, which they set on fire. General Tryon’s apology for the unnecessary destruction of private property, which marred his actions, is evidence of the strong response from the militia at this location. "The village was burnt," he stated, "to retaliate against the rebels firing from their homes and to cover our retreat."

July.

From Fairfield the fleet crossed the Sound to Huntingdon bay, where it remained until the[Pg 125] eleventh, when it recrossed that water, after which the troops were landed in the night on the low pasture, a peninsula on the east side of the bay of Norwalk. About the same time, a much larger detachment from the British army directed its course towards Horse Neck, and made demonstrations of a design to penetrate into the country in that direction.

From Fairfield, the fleet crossed the Sound to Huntington Bay, where it stayed until the[Pg 125] eleventh. After that, the troops were landed at night on the low pasture, a peninsula on the east side of Norwalk Bay. Around the same time, a much larger group from the British army headed towards Horse Neck and showed signs of wanting to move into the area in that direction.

On the first intelligence that Connecticut was invaded, General Parsons, a native of that state, had been directed by General Washington to hasten to the scene of action. July.Placing himself at the head of about one hundred and fifty continental troops, who were supported by considerable bodies of militia, he attacked the British in the morning of the twelfth, as soon as they were in motion, and kept up an irregular distant fire throughout the day. But being too weak to prevent the destruction of any particular town on the coast, Norwalk was reduced to ashes; after which the British re-embarked, and returned to Huntingdon bay, there to wait for reinforcements. At this place, however, Tryon received orders to return to the White Stone; where, in a conference between Sir Henry Clinton and Sir George Collier, it was determined to proceed against New London with an increased force.

On the first news that Connecticut was invaded, General Parsons, who was from that state, was instructed by General Washington to hurry to the action. July. He took charge of about one hundred and fifty Continental troops, backed by a significant number of militia, and launched an attack on the British on the morning of the twelfth, as soon as they moved. Throughout the day, he maintained an irregular distant fire. However, he was too outnumbered to stop the destruction of any specific town on the coast, and Norwalk was burned to the ground. After that, the British regrouped and returned to Huntingdon Bay to wait for reinforcements. At this location, though, Tryon was ordered to head back to White Stone, where a meeting between Sir Henry Clinton and Sir George Collier decided to move against New London with a larger force.

On the invasion of Connecticut, the Commander-in-chief was prompt in his exertions to send continental troops from the nearest en[Pg 126]campments to its aid; but, before they could afford any real service, Sir Henry Clinton found it necessary to recall Tryon to the Hudson.

On the invasion of Connecticut, the Commander-in-chief quickly worked to send continental troops from the nearest encampments to help; however, before they could provide any real support, Sir Henry Clinton decided it was necessary to recall Tryon to the Hudson.

General Washington had planned an enterprise against the posts at King's Ferry, comprehending a double attack, to be made at the same time, on both. But the difficulty of a perfect co-operation of detachments, incapable of communicating with each other, determined him to postpone the attack on Verplank's, and to make that part of the plan dependent on the success of the first. His whole attention therefore was turned to Stony Point; and the troops destined for this critical service, proceeded on it as against a single object.

General Washington had planned an operation against the posts at King's Ferry, involving a simultaneous double attack on both. However, the challenge of coordinating his detachments, which couldn't communicate with each other, led him to delay the attack on Verplank's and make that part of the plan contingent on the success of the first. Therefore, he focused all his attention on Stony Point, and the troops assigned for this critical mission moved forward as if it were their only target.

The execution of the plan was entrusted to General Wayne, who commanded the light infantry of the army. Secrecy was deemed so much more essential to success than numbers, that no addition was made to the force already on the lines. One brigade was ordered to commence its march, so as to reach the scene of action in time to cover the troops engaged in the attack, should any unlooked-for disaster befall them; and Major Lee of the light dragoons, who had been eminently useful in obtaining the intelligence which led to the enterprise, was associated with General Wayne, as far as cavalry could be employed in such a service. July.The night of the fifteenth, and the hour of twelve, were chosen for the assault.[Pg 127]

The execution of the plan was handed over to General Wayne, who led the army's light infantry. Secrecy was considered much more critical to success than having a large force, so no extra troops were added to those already on the lines. One brigade was instructed to start its march so that it could reach the action in time to support the troops involved in the attack, in case any unforeseen disaster struck them; and Major Lee of the light dragoons, who had been extremely helpful in gathering the intelligence that led to the mission, was teamed up with General Wayne, as far as cavalry could be used for such a task. July.The night of the fifteenth, at midnight, was selected for the assault.[Pg 127]

Stony Point is a commanding hill, projecting far into the Hudson, which washes three-fourths of its base. The remaining fourth is, in a great measure, covered by a deep marsh, commencing near the river on the upper side, and continuing into it below. Over this marsh there is only one crossing place; but at its junction with the river, is a sandy beach, passable at low tide. On the summit of this hill stood the fort, which was furnished with heavy ordnance. Several breast-works and strong batteries were advanced in front of the main work; and, about half way down the hill, were two rows of abattis. The batteries were calculated to command the beach and the crossing place of the marsh, and to rake and enfilade any column which might be advancing from either of those points towards the fort. In addition to these defences, several vessels of war were stationed in the river, and commanded the ground at the foot of the hill. The garrison consisted of about six hundred men, commanded by Colonel Johnson.

Stony Point is an impressive hill that juts out into the Hudson River, which washes three-quarters of its base. The remaining quarter is largely covered by a deep marsh that starts near the river on the upper side and extends into it below. There’s only one crossing point over this marsh, but where it meets the river, there’s a sandy beach that can be crossed at low tide. At the top of this hill stood a fort equipped with heavy artillery. Several defensive walls and strong batteries were set up in front of the main structure, and about halfway down the hill, there were two rows of sharpened sticks. The batteries were designed to control the beach and the marsh's crossing point, and to fire on any group trying to advance from those areas towards the fort. In addition to these defenses, several warships were stationed in the river, overseeing the area at the foot of the hill. The garrison had about six hundred men, led by Colonel Johnson.

General Wayne arrived about eight in the afternoon at Spring Steel's, one and a half miles from the fort; and made his dispositions for the assault.

General Wayne arrived around eight in the evening at Spring Steel's, which is one and a half miles from the fort, and made his plans for the assault.

It was intended to attack the works on the right and left flanks at the same instant. The regiments of Febiger and of Meigs, with Major Hull's detachment, formed the right column; and Butler's regiment, with two companies un[Pg 128]der Major Murfree, formed the left. One hundred and fifty volunteers, led by Lieutenant Colonel Fleury and Major Posey, constituted the van of the right; and one hundred volunteers under Major Stewart, composed the van of the left. At half past eleven the two columns moved to the assault, the van of each with unloaded muskets, and fixed bayonets. They were each preceded by a forlorn hope of twenty men, the one commanded by Lieutenant Gibbon, and the other by Lieutenant Knox. General Wayne surprises and takes Stony Point.They reached the marsh undiscovered; and, at twenty minutes after twelve, commenced the assault.

It was planned to attack the positions on the right and left sides simultaneously. The regiments of Febiger and Meigs, along with Major Hull's detachment, made up the right column; while Butler's regiment and two companies under Major Murfree formed the left. One hundred and fifty volunteers, led by Lieutenant Colonel Fleury and Major Posey, were at the front of the right; and one hundred volunteers under Major Stewart were at the front of the left. At 11:30, the two columns launched their assault, with the front line of each unit carrying unloaded muskets and fixed bayonets. They were each led by a desperate hope of twenty men, one commanded by Lieutenant Gibbon and the other by Lieutenant Knox. General Wayne surprises and captures Stony Point. They reached the marsh without being detected, and at 12:20, they began the attack.

Both columns rushed forward under a tremendous fire. Surmounting every obstacle, they entered the works at the point of the bayonet; and, without discharging a single musket, obtained possession of the fort.

Both columns charged forward under heavy fire. Overcoming every obstacle, they got into the fort with the bayonet, and without firing a single shot, took control of the fort.

The humanity displayed by the conquerors was not less conspicuous, nor less honourable than their courage. Not an individual suffered after resistance had ceased.

The compassion shown by the conquerors was just as noticeable and honorable as their bravery. No one was harmed after the fighting stopped.

All the troops engaged in this perilous service manifested a degree of ardour and impetuosity, which proved them to be capable of the most difficult enterprises; and all distinguished themselves, whose situation enabled them to do so. Colonel Fleury was the first to enter the fort and strike the British standard. Major Posey mounted the works almost at the same instant, and was the first to give the watch word—"The[Pg 129] fort's our own."—Lieutenants Gibbon and Knox performed the service allotted to them with a degree of intrepidity which could not be surpassed. Of twenty men who constituted the party of the former, seventeen were killed or wounded.

All the troops involved in this dangerous mission showed a level of passion and eagerness that proved they were capable of tackling the toughest challenges; and all those who could, stood out. Colonel Fleury was the first to enter the fort and take down the British flag. Major Posey climbed the walls almost at the same moment and was the first to shout the password—"The[Pg 129] fort's ours."—Lieutenants Gibbon and Knox carried out their assigned tasks with bravery that was unmatched. Out of the twenty men in the party led by the former, seventeen were either killed or injured.

Sixty-three of the garrison were killed, including two officers. The prisoners amounted to five hundred and forty-three, among whom were one lieutenant colonel, four captains, and twenty subaltern officers. The military stores taken in the fort were considerable.[18]

Sixty-three members of the garrison were killed, including two officers. The number of prisoners was five hundred and forty-three, which included one lieutenant colonel, four captains, and twenty junior officers. The military supplies seized from the fort were significant.[18]

The loss sustained by the assailants was not proportioned to the apparent danger of the enterprise. The killed and wounded did not exceed one hundred men; General Wayne, who marched with Febiger's regiment in the right column, received a slight wound in the head which stunned him for a time, but did not compel him to leave the column. Being supported by his aids, he entered the fort with a regiment. Lieutenant Colonel Hay was also among the wounded.

The losses suffered by the attackers were not in line with the apparent risk of their mission. The number of killed and injured didn’t exceed one hundred men; General Wayne, who marched with Febiger's regiment on the right, got a minor head wound that stunned him for a bit but didn’t force him to leave the group. With the help of his aides, he entered the fort with a regiment. Lieutenant Colonel Hay was also among the injured.

Although the design upon fort Fayette had yielded to the desire of securing the success of the attack on Stony Point, it had not been abandoned. Two brigades under General M'Dougal had been ordered to approach the works on Verplank's, in which Colonel Webster commanded,[Pg 130] and be in readiness to attack them the instant General Wayne should obtain possession of Stony Point. That this detachment might not permit the favourable moment to pass unimproved, Wayne had been requested to direct the messenger who should convey the intelligence of his success to the Commander-in-chief, to pass through M'Dougal's camp, and give him advice of that event. He was also requested to turn the cannon of the fort against Verplank's, and the vessels in the river. The last orders were executed, and a heavy cannonade was opened on fort Fayette, and on the vessels, which compelled them to fall down the river. Through some misconception, never explained, the messenger despatched by General Wayne did not call on M'Dougal, but proceeded directly to head quarters. Thus, every advantage expected from the first impression made by the capture of Stony Point was lost; and the garrison had full leisure to recover from the surprise occasioned by that event, and to prepare for an attack. This change of circumstances made it necessary to change the plan of operation. General Howe was directed to take the command of M'Dougal's detachment, to which some pieces of heavy artillery were to be annexed. He was ordered, after effecting a breach in the walls, to make the dispositions for an assault, and to demand a surrender; but not to attempt a storm until it should be dark. To these orders, ex[Pg 131]plicit instructions were added not to hazard his party by remaining before Verplank's, after the British should cross Croton River in force.

Although the design for Fort Fayette had been set aside to ensure the success of the attack on Stony Point, it hadn’t been completely abandoned. Two brigades under General M'Dougal were ordered to approach the works at Verplank's, which was commanded by Colonel Webster,[Pg 130] and be ready to attack the moment General Wayne secured Stony Point. To make sure this group didn’t miss the opportune moment, Wayne was asked to instruct the messenger delivering the news of his success to the Commander-in-chief to go through M'Dougal's camp and inform him of the event. He was also asked to turn the fort’s cannons against Verplank's and the ships in the river. These last orders were carried out, and a heavy cannon fire was opened on Fort Fayette and on the vessels, forcing them to retreat down the river. Due to some misunderstanding that was never clarified, the messenger sent by General Wayne didn’t stop at M'Dougal’s but went straight to headquarters. As a result, all the advantages expected from the surprise gained by taking Stony Point were lost, allowing the garrison ample time to recover from the shock of that event and prepare for an attack. This shift in circumstances made it necessary to alter the operational plan. General Howe was assigned to take command of M'Dougal’s detachment, which was to be reinforced with some heavy artillery. He was ordered, after creating a breach in the walls, to prepare for an assault and demand a surrender but to wait until dark to attempt a storm. Explicit instructions were also added not to risk his party by staying in front of Verplank's after the British crossed Croton River in force.[Pg 131]

 

Stony Point

Stony Point

 The Ruins of Stony Point—On the Hudson

The Ruins of Stony Point—On the Hudson

Here, on the night of July 16, 1779, Brigadier-General (Mad Anthony) Wayne led his troops up the hill in darkness, surprised the British garrison and captured this British stronghold at the point of the bayonet. Not a shot was fired by the Americans, who lost fifteen killed and eighty-three wounded; the British sixty-three killed and 533 prisoners. The fortifications were destroyed and the place, being untenable, was abandoned shortly afterwards by the Americans.

On the night of July 16, 1779, Brigadier-General (Mad Anthony) Wayne guided his troops up the hill in the dark, catching the British garrison off guard and taking this British stronghold at bayonet point. The Americans didn’t fire a shot, suffering fifteen killed and eighty-three wounded, while the British lost sixty-three killed and had 533 taken prisoner. The fortifications were demolished, and since the location was no longer defensible, it was abandoned by the Americans shortly after.

 

Through some unaccountable negligence in the persons charged with the execution of these orders, the battering artillery was not accompanied with suitable ammunition; and the necessary intrenching tools were not brought. These omissions were supplied the next day; but it was then too late to proceed against Verplank's.

Through some inexplicable oversight by those responsible for carrying out these orders, the heavy artillery was not sent with the proper ammunition, and the needed digging tools were not brought along. These oversights were corrected the next day, but by then it was too late to take action against Verplank's.

On receiving intelligence of the loss of Stony Point, and of the danger to which the garrison of fort Fayette was exposed, Sir Henry Clinton relinquished his views on Connecticut, and made a forced march to Dobbs' Ferry. Some troops were immediately embarked to pass up the river, and a light corps was pushed forward to the Croton. This movement relieved fort Fayette.

On getting word about the loss of Stony Point and the risk the garrison at Fort Fayette was facing, Sir Henry Clinton gave up on his plans for Connecticut and quickly marched to Dobbs' Ferry. Some troops were immediately sent to travel up the river, and a light corps moved ahead to the Croton. This action provided relief to Fort Fayette.

The failure of the attempt to obtain possession of Verplank's Point leaving that road of communication still closed, diminished the advantages which had been expected to result from the enterprise so much, that it was deemed unadviseable to maintain Stony Point. On reconnoitring the ground, General Washington believed that the place could not be rendered secure with a garrison of less than fifteen hundred men; a number which could not be spared from the army without weakening it too much for farther operations. He determined there[Pg 132]fore to evacuate Stony Point, and retire to the Highlands. As soon as this resolution was executed, Sir Henry Clinton repossessed himself of that post, repaired the fortifications, and placed a stronger garrison in it; after which he resumed his former situation at Philipsburg.

The failed attempt to gain control of Verplank's Point, which kept that communication route closed, significantly reduced the benefits expected from the operation, making it unwise to keep Stony Point. After surveying the area, General Washington felt that the site couldn't be adequately defended with fewer than fifteen hundred troops; a number that couldn't be taken from the army without compromising its strength for future actions. He decided, therefore, to abandon Stony Point and retreat to the Highlands. Once this decision was carried out, Sir Henry Clinton took back that position, repaired the defenses, and stationed a stronger garrison there; afterward, he returned to his previous location at Philipsburg.

The two armies watched each other for some time. At length, Sir Henry Clinton, finding himself unable to attack Washington in the strong position he had taken, or to draw him from it, and being desirous of transferring the theatre of active war to the south, withdrew into York Island, and was understood to be strengthening the fortifications erected for its defence, as preparatory to the large detachments he intended making to reinforce the southern army.

The two armies stared at each other for a while. Eventually, Sir Henry Clinton, realizing he couldn't attack Washington in the strong position he had taken or lure him out of it, and wanting to shift the focus of active warfare to the south, retreated to York Island. He was seen reinforcing the fortifications built for its defense, getting ready for the large detachments he planned to send to support the southern army.

Although this movement was made principally with a view to southern operations, it was in some degree hastened by the opinion, that New York required immediate additional protection during the absence of the fleet, which was about to sail for the relief of Penobscot.

Although this movement was mainly intended for southern operations, it was partly sped up by the belief that New York needed extra protection right away while the fleet was away, heading out to support Penobscot.

Expedition against Penobscot.

Early in June, Colonel M'Clean, with six hundred and fifty men, had penetrated from Nova Scotia into the eastern parts of Maine, and taken possession of a strong piece of ground on the Penobscot, which he had begun to fortify.

Early in June, Colonel M'Clean, with six hundred and fifty men, had moved from Nova Scotia into the eastern parts of Maine and taken control of a strategic area on the Penobscot, which he had started to fortify.

The state of Massachusetts, alarmed at an invasion which threatened a serious diminution of territory, determined to dislodge him. A respectable fleet, commanded by Commodore Sal[Pg 133]tonstal, and an army of near four thousand men, under General Lovell, were prepared with so much celerity, July 25.that the whole armament appeared in the Penobscot as early as the 25th of July.

The state of Massachusetts, worried about an invasion that could significantly reduce its territory, decided to get him out. A respectable fleet, led by Commodore Sal[Pg 133]tonstal, and an army of nearly four thousand men, under General Lovell, were organized so quickly, July 25th.that the entire force arrived in the Penobscot as early as July 25.

M'Clean had taken possession of a peninsula on the eastern side of Penobscot, and had intrenched the isthmus connecting it with the continent. The part towards the river was steep and difficult of access; and was also defended by his frigates and batteries, the principal of which was constructed about the centre of the peninsula.

M'Clean had taken control of a peninsula on the eastern side of Penobscot and had fortified the isthmus that linked it to the mainland. The section facing the river was steep and hard to reach; it was also protected by his frigates and artillery, with the main battery built near the center of the peninsula.

After being repulsed in his first attempt, General Lovell effected a landing on the western part of the peninsula, where he ascended a precipice of two hundred feet; and, with the loss of only fifty men killed and wounded, drove the party which defended it from the ground. A battery was erected within seven hundred and fifty yards of the main work of the besieged, and a warm cannonade was kept up for several days on both sides.

After being pushed back in his first attempt, General Lovell successfully landed on the western part of the peninsula, where he climbed a two-hundred-foot cliff. With only fifty men killed and injured, he forced the defending group off the ground. A battery was set up about seven hundred and fifty yards from the main position of the besieged, and heavy cannon fire continued from both sides for several days.

Perceiving the difficulty of carrying the place with a militia impatient to return to their homes, General Lovell represented his situation to the government of Massachusetts, who applied to General Gates, then commanding at Providence, for a reinforcement of four hundred continental troops. This request was readily granted, and Jackson's regiment was ordered to Penobscot.[Pg 134] In the mean time an ineffectual cannonade was continued, and preparations were made to storm the works on the arrival of the expected reinforcements.

Seeing the challenge of managing the position with a militia eager to head home, General Lovell explained his situation to the Massachusetts government, who then reached out to General Gates, who was in command at Providence, for an extra four hundred Continental troops. This request was quickly approved, and Jackson's regiment was sent to Penobscot.[Pg 134] In the meantime, an ineffective cannon fire continued, and plans were made to attack the fortifications upon the arrival of the anticipated reinforcements.

Such was the posture of affairs on the 13th of August, when Lovell received information that Sir George Collier had entered the river with a superior naval force. He re-embarked his whole army the following night, and drew up his flotilla in a crescent across the river, as if determined to maintain its position. This show of resistance was made in the hope of stopping Sir George Collier until the land forces on board the transports could be conveyed up the river, and disembarked on the western shore. But the British general was too confident in his strength to permit this stratagem to succeed; and, as he approached, the Americans sought for safety in flight. A general chase and unresisted destruction ensued. The ships of war were blown up, and the transports fled in the utmost confusion up the river. Being pursued by the British squadron, the troops landed in a wild uncultivated country; and were obliged to explore their way, without provisions, through a pathless wilderness, for more than a hundred miles. Exhausted with famine and fatigue, they at length gained the settled parts of the country, after having lost several men who perished in the woods.[Pg 135]

On August 13th, Lovell learned that Sir George Collier had come into the river with a stronger naval force. That night, he reloaded his entire army and positioned his flotilla in a crescent shape across the river, as if he was ready to hold his ground. This act of defiance was meant to delay Sir George Collier until the land forces on the transports could be moved up the river and unloaded on the western shore. However, the British general was too sure of his advantage to let this tactic work, and as he got closer, the Americans fled for safety. A widespread chase and uncontested destruction followed. The warships were blown up, and the transports escaped in complete chaos up the river. Pursued by the British fleet, the troops landed in a rough, untamed area and had to navigate their way without food through a trackless wilderness for more than a hundred miles. Worn out by hunger and exhaustion, they finally reached more settled regions, having lost several men who died in the woods.[Pg 135]

While Sir Henry Clinton continued encamped just above Haerlem, with his upper posts at Kingsbridge, and the American army preserved its station in the Highlands, a bold plan was formed for surprising a British post at Powles Hook, which was executed with great address by Major Lee.

While Sir Henry Clinton remained camped just above Harlem, with his upper posts at Kingsbridge, and the American army held its position in the Highlands, a daring plan was devised to catch a British post at Paulus Hook off guard, which Major Lee carried out very skillfully.

This officer was employed on the west side of the river with directions to observe the situation of the British in Stony Point, but, principally, to watch the motions of their main army. While his parties scoured the country, he obtained intelligence which suggested the idea of surprising and carrying off the garrison at Powles Hook, a point of land on the west side of the Hudson, immediately opposite the town of New York, penetrating deep into the river. On the point nearest New York, some works had been constructed, which were garrisoned by four or five hundred men.

This officer was assigned to the west side of the river with instructions to keep an eye on the British forces in Stony Point, but mainly to monitor the movements of their main army. While his teams patrolled the area, he received information that sparked the idea of surprising and capturing the garrison at Powles Hook, a piece of land on the west side of the Hudson, directly across from New York City, extending deep into the river. At the point closest to New York, some fortifications had been built, which were manned by four or five hundred troops.

A deep ditch, into which the water of the river flowed, having over it a drawbridge connected with a barred gate, had been cut across the isthmus, so as to make the Hook, in reality, an island. This ditch could be passed only at low water. Thirty paces within it was a row of abattis running into the river; and some distance in front of it, is a creek fordable only in two places.

A deep ditch, fed by the river, had been dug across the isthmus, creating the Hook as an actual island. This ditch could only be crossed at low tide. Thirty paces inside it was a line of defense reaching into the river, and further ahead was a creek that could only be crossed in two spots.

This difficulty of access, added to the remoteness of the nearest corps of the American[Pg 136] army, impressed the garrison with the opinion that they were perfectly secure; and this opinion produced an unmilitary remissness in the commanding officer, which did not escape the vigilance of Lee.

This difficulty in getting there, combined with how far away the nearest American army unit was, made the garrison feel completely safe. This sense of security led to a careless attitude from the commanding officer, which did not go unnoticed by Lee.

On receiving his communications, General Washington was inclined to favour the enterprise they suggested; but withheld his full assent, until he was satisfied that the assailants would be able to make good their retreat.

On receiving his messages, General Washington was inclined to support the venture they proposed; however, he withheld his full approval until he was convinced that the attackers could successfully retreat.

The Hackensack, which communicates with the waters of the Hudson below New York, runs almost parallel with that river quite to its source, and is separated from it only a few miles. This neck is still farther narrowed by a deep creek which divides it, and empties into the Hackensack below fort Lee. West of that river runs the Passaick, which unites with it near Newark, and forms another long and narrow neck of land. From Powles Hook to the new bridge, the first place where the Hackensack could be crossed without boats, the distance is fourteen miles; and from the North River to the road leading from the one place to the other, there are three points of interception, the nearest of which is less than two miles, and the farthest not more than three. The British were encamped in full force along the North River, opposite to these points of interception. To diminish the danger of the retreat, it was intended to occupy the roads leading through the[Pg 137] mountains of the Hudson to the Hackensack with a select body of troops.

The Hackensack River, which connects to the waters of the Hudson River just below New York, runs almost parallel to it all the way to its source, with only a few miles separating them. This area is further narrowed by a deep creek that splits it and flows into the Hackensack just below Fort Lee. West of that river is the Passaic, which merges with the Hackensack near Newark, creating another long and narrow stretch of land. From Powles Hook to the new bridge, which is the first spot where the Hackensack can be crossed without boats, the distance is fourteen miles. Between the North River and the road connecting these two points, there are three places to cross, the closest being less than two miles away and the farthest not more than three. The British had a large camp set up along the North River, directly across from these crossing points. To reduce the risks of retreat, plans were made to secure the roads through the[Pg 137] Hudson mountains leading to the Hackensack with a select group of troops.

Every preparatory arrangement being made, the night of the eighteenth of August was fixed on for the enterprise. A detachment from the division of Lord Stirling, including three hundred men designed for the expedition, was ordered down as a foraging party. As there was nothing unusual in this movement, it excited no suspicion. Lord Stirling followed with five hundred men, and encamped at the new bridge.

Every necessary arrangement was made, and the night of August eighteenth was set for the mission. A group from Lord Stirling's division, including three hundred men intended for the operation, was sent out as a foraging party. Since there was nothing unusual about this movement, it raised no suspicion. Lord Stirling followed with five hundred men and set up camp at the new bridge.

Major Lee, at the head of three hundred men, took the road through the mountains which ran parallel to the North River; and, having secured all the passes into York Island, reached the creek which surrounds the Hook between two and three in the morning. The British post at Powles Hook surprised by Major Lee and the garrison made prisoners.He passed first the creek, and then the ditch undiscovered; and, about three in the morning, entered the main work, and with the loss of only two killed and three wounded, made one hundred and fifty-nine prisoners, including three officers. Very few of the British were killed. Major Sutherland, who commanded the garrison, threw himself with forty or fifty Hessians into a strong redoubt, which it was thought unadviseable to attack, because the time occupied in carrying it might endanger the retreat. Wasting no time in destroying what could easily be replaced, Major Lee hastened to bring off his prisoners and his detachment.[Pg 138]

Major Lee, leading three hundred men, took the route through the mountains that ran alongside the North River. After securing all the passes into York Island, he reached the creek that surrounds the Hook between two and three in the morning. Major Lee surprised the British post at Powles Hook and captured the garrison. He crossed the creek and then the ditch without being detected, and around three in the morning, he entered the main fortification. With only two killed and three wounded on his side, he captured one hundred and fifty-nine prisoners, including three officers. Very few British soldiers were killed. Major Sutherland, who was in charge of the garrison, retreated with forty or fifty Hessians into a strong redoubt, which they decided not to attack, as doing so could jeopardize their escape. Wasting no time destroying what could easily be replaced, Major Lee hurried to take his prisoners and his detachment back.[Pg 138]

To avoid the danger of retreating up the narrow neck of land which has already been described, some boats had been brought in the course of the night to Dow's Ferry on the Hackensack, not far from Powles Hook. The officer who guarded them was directed to remain until the arrival of the troops engaged in the expedition, which, it was understood, would happen before day. The light having made its appearance without any intelligence from Major Lee, the officer having charge of the boats conjectured that the attack had been postponed; and, to avoid discovery, retired with them to Newark. The head of the retreating column soon afterwards reached the ferry; and, fatigued as they were by the toilsome march of the preceding night, were compelled to pass as rapidly as possible up the narrow neck of land between the two rivers to the new bridge. A horseman was despatched with this information to Lord Stirling, and the line of march was resumed.

To avoid the risk of retreating up the narrow piece of land that has already been mentioned, some boats were brought during the night to Dow's Ferry on the Hackensack, not far from Powles Hook. The officer in charge of them was ordered to stay until the troops involved in the mission arrived, which was expected to happen before dawn. When morning came without any news from Major Lee, the officer in charge of the boats guessed that the attack had been delayed; to avoid being discovered, he took them to Newark. The front of the retreating group soon reached the ferry; and, exhausted from the difficult march the night before, they had to move as quickly as possible up the narrow stretch of land between the two rivers to the new bridge. A horseman was sent with this information to Lord Stirling, and the march continued.

About nine in the preceding evening, Major Buskirk had been detached up the North River with a considerable part of the garrison of Powles Hook, and some other troops, for the purpose of falling in with the American party supposed to be foraging about the English neighbourhood.

About nine o'clock the night before, Major Buskirk had been sent up the North River with a significant portion of the garrison from Powles Hook and some other troops to try to catch the American party thought to be foraging around the English neighborhood.

On receiving intelligence of the disappointment respecting the boats, Lord Stirling took the[Pg 139] precaution to detach Colonel Ball with two hundred fresh men to meet Lee, and cover his retreat. Just after Ball had passed, Buskirk entered the main road, and fired on his rear. Taking it for granted that this was only the advanced corps of a large detachment sent to intercept the party retreating from Powles Hook, Ball made a circuit to avoid the enemy; and Buskirk, finding a detachment he had not expected, took the same measure to secure his own retreat. The two parties, narrowly missing each other, returned to their respective points of departure; and Lee reached the new bridge without interruption.[19]

Upon learning about the setback with the boats, Lord Stirling decided to send Colonel Ball with two hundred fresh troops to meet Lee and cover his retreat. Just as Ball had passed, Buskirk entered the main road and fired at his rear. Assuming this was just the advance party of a larger force sent to cut off the retreating group from Powles Hook, Ball took a detour to avoid the enemy. Meanwhile, Buskirk, encountering a detachment he hadn't anticipated, did the same to secure his own retreat. The two groups narrowly missed each other and returned to their respective starting points, while Lee made it to the new bridge without any issues.[Pg 139][19]

This critical enterprise reflected much honour on the partisan with whom it originated, and by whom it was conducted. General Washington announced it to the army in his orders with much approbation; and congress bestowed upon it a degree of applause more adapted to the talent displayed in performing the service than to its magnitude.

This important effort brought a lot of respect to the supporter who started it and led it. General Washington informed the army about it in his orders with great approval; and Congress gave it praise that was more suited to the skill shown in carrying out the task than to its size.

Arrival of Admiral Arbuthnot.

A few days after the surprise of Powles Hook, the long expected fleet from Europe, under the command of Admiral Arbuthnot, having on board a reinforcement for the British army, arrived at New York. This reinforcement however did not enable Sir Henry Clinton to enter immediately on that active course of offensive[Pg 140] operations which he had meditated. It was soon followed by the Count D'Estaing, who arrived on the southern coast of America with a powerful fleet; after which the British general deemed it necessary to turn all his attention to his own security. Rhode Island, and the posts up the North River were evacuated, and the whole army was collected in New York, the fortifications of which were carried on with unremitting industry.

A few days after the surprise at Powles Hook, the much-anticipated fleet from Europe, led by Admiral Arbuthnot and carrying reinforcements for the British army, arrived in New York. However, this reinforcement didn’t allow Sir Henry Clinton to immediately pursue the offensive operations he had planned. Shortly after, Count D'Estaing arrived on the southern coast of America with a strong fleet; as a result, the British general felt it was essential to focus entirely on his own security. Rhode Island and the positions up the North River were abandoned, and the entire army was gathered in New York, where the fortifications were being built with relentless effort.

The Count D'Estaing and Admiral Byron, having sailed about the same time from the coast of North America, met in the West Indies, where the war was carried on with various success. St. Lucia taken by the British. St. Vincents and Grenada by the French.St. Lucia surrendered to the British, in compensation for which the French took St. Vincents and Grenada. About the time of the capture of the latter island, D'Estaing received reinforcements which gave him a decided naval superiority; after which a battle was fought between the two hostile fleets, in which the Count claimed the victory, and in which so many of the British ships were disabled that the Admiral was compelled to retire into port in order to refit.

The Count D'Estaing and Admiral Byron set sail around the same time from the North American coast and met in the West Indies, where the war unfolded with mixed success. The British captured St. Lucia, while the French took St. Vincent and Grenada. St. Lucia surrendered to the British, and in exchange, the French captured St. Vincent and Grenada. Around the time the latter island was taken, D'Estaing received reinforcements that gave him a clear naval advantage; after that, a battle took place between the two enemy fleets, where the Count claimed victory and many British ships were damaged, forcing the Admiral to retreat to port for repairs.

The earnest representations made on the part of the United States had prevailed on the cabinet of Versailles to instruct the Count D'Estaing to afford them all the aid in his power; and the present moment seemed a fit one for carrying these orders into execution. Let[Pg 141]ters from General Lincoln, from the executive of South Carolina, and from the French consul at Charleston, urged him to pay a visit to the southern states; and represented the situation of the British in Georgia to be such that his appearance would insure the destruction of the army in that quarter, and the recovery of the state.

The serious requests made by the United States convinced the cabinet in Versailles to order Count D'Estaing to provide all the support he could. The current moment seemed like a perfect time to put these orders into action. Letters from General Lincoln, the governor of South Carolina, and the French consul in Charleston encouraged him to visit the southern states. They explained that the British forces in Georgia were in such a position that his presence would guarantee the defeat of their army there and the reclaiming of the state.

Count D'Estaing with his fleet arrives on the southern coast of America.

Yielding to these solicitations, the Count sailed with twenty-two ships of the line, and eleven frigates, having on board six thousand soldiers, and arrived so suddenly on the southern coast of America, that the Experiment of fifty guns, and three frigates, fell into his hands. A vessel was sent to Charleston with information of his arrival, and a plan was concerted for the siege of Savannah. D'Estaing was to land three thousand men at Beaulieu on the 11th of September, and Lincoln was to cross the Savannah on the same day with one thousand Americans, and effect a junction with him.

Giving in to these requests, the Count set sail with twenty-two ships of the line and eleven frigates, carrying six thousand soldiers. He arrived so unexpectedly on the southern coast of America that he captured the Experiment with fifty guns and three frigates. A ship was sent to Charleston to inform them of his arrival, and a plan was made for the siege of Savannah. D'Estaing was set to land three thousand men at Beaulieu on September 11th, while Lincoln would cross the Savannah on the same day with one thousand Americans to join forces with him.

The town of Savannah was, at that time, the head quarters of General Prevost. Apprehending no immediate danger, he had weakened the garrison by establishing several out-posts in Georgia; and by leaving Colonel Maitland with a strong detachment in the island of Port Royal, in South Carolina.

The town of Savannah was, at that time, the headquarters of General Prevost. Seeing no immediate danger, he had reduced the garrison by setting up several outposts in Georgia and by leaving Colonel Maitland with a strong detachment on Port Royal Island in South Carolina.

On the appearance of the French fleet, expresses were despatched to Colonel Maitland and to all the out-posts, directing the troops to re[Pg 142]pair without loss of time to Savannah. These orders were promptly obeyed; and, on the 10th of September, the several detachments in Georgia had all arrived in safety, except the sick and convalescents of the garrison of Sunbury, who were intercepted.

On the arrival of the French fleet, messengers were sent to Colonel Maitland and all the outposts, instructing the troops to re[Pg 142]pair immediately to Savannah. These orders were quickly followed; by September 10th, all the different units in Georgia had arrived safely, except for the sick and recovering members of the garrison at Sunbury, who were blocked.

September.
Siege of Savannah by the combined armies.

On the 11th, General Lincoln reached Zubly's Ferry, and, on the 15th, was assured that the French had disembarked in force. A junction of the two armies was formed the next day before the town of Savannah.

On the 11th, General Lincoln arrived at Zubly's Ferry, and on the 15th, he was informed that the French had landed with a strong force. The two armies joined together the next day in front of the town of Savannah.

On the night of the 12th, the Count D'Estaing had landed about three thousand men at Beaulieu; and the next day, before the arrival of General Lincoln, had summoned the garrison to surrender to the arms of the King of France. Being desirous of gaining time, General Prevost answered the summons in such a manner as to encourage the opinion that he designed to capitulate; in the expectation of which a suspension of hostilities for twenty-four hours was granted. In that important interval, Colonel Maitland arrived from Beaufort, with the troops which had been stationed at that place.

On the night of the 12th, Count D'Estaing landed about three thousand men at Beaulieu; the next day, before General Lincoln arrived, he called on the garrison to surrender to the King of France's forces. Wanting to buy some time, General Prevost responded to the demand in a way that suggested he was considering surrendering. In light of that, a ceasefire for twenty-four hours was agreed upon. During that crucial time, Colonel Maitland arrived from Beaufort with the troops that had been stationed there.

As the French were in possession of the main channel by which the Savannah communicates with the sea, Colonel Maitland entered the town by a route which had been deemed impracticable. He came round by Dawfuskie, an island north of the mouth of the river, and landing in a deep marsh, drew his boats through it into the[Pg 143] Savannah, above the place where the ships lay at anchor, and thence made his way by small parties into the town.

As the French controlled the main route connecting Savannah to the sea, Colonel Maitland entered the town through a path considered impossible. He navigated around Dawfuskie, an island north of the river's mouth, and landed in a deep marsh, pulling his boats through it into the[Pg 143] Savannah, just above where the ships were anchored, and then made his way into the town in small groups.

On receiving this reinforcement, the resolution was taken to defend the place to the last extremity; and, the next day, this determination was communicated to the Count D'Estaing.

Upon receiving this reinforcement, a decision was made to defend the place to the very end; and the next day, this determination was communicated to Count D'Estaing.

September.

After bringing up the heavy ordnance and stores from the fleet, the besieging army broke ground; and, by the first of October, had pushed their sap within three hundred yards of the abattis on the left of the British lines. Several batteries were opened on the besieged which played almost incessantly upon their works, but made no impression on them.

After bringing up the heavy weapons and supplies from the fleet, the besieging army started digging; and by the first of October, they had pushed their tunnel within three hundred yards of the barricade on the left side of the British lines. Several artillery batteries were set up against the besieged, bombarding their positions almost nonstop, but they didn't have any effect on them.

The situation of D'Estaing was becoming critical. More time had already been consumed on the coast of Georgia than he had supposed would be necessary for the destruction of the British force in that state. He became uneasy for the possessions of France in the West Indies, and apprehensive for the safety of the ships under his command. The naval officers remonstrated strenuously against longer exposing his fleet on an insecure coast, at a tempestuous season of the year, and urged the danger of being overtaken by a British squadron, when broken and scattered by a storm, with a degree of persevering earnestness which the Count found himself incapable of resisting.[Pg 144]

The situation for D'Estaing was becoming critical. More time had already been spent on the coast of Georgia than he had expected would be needed to eliminate the British forces in that area. He began to worry about France's possessions in the West Indies and the safety of the ships under his command. The naval officers strongly protested against keeping his fleet exposed on an unstable coast during such a stormy time of year, highlighting the risk of being caught by a British squadron when vulnerable and scattered by a storm, with a level of determination that the Count found himself unable to ignore.[Pg 144]

In a few days the lines of the besiegers might have been carried by regular approaches, into the works of the besieged, which would have rendered the capture of the town and garrison inevitable. But D'Estaing declared that he could devote no more time to this object; and it only remained to raise the siege, or to attempt the works by storm. The latter part of the alternative was adopted.

In a few days, the attackers could have moved closer to the defenses of the defenders, making the capture of the town and garrison unavoidable. However, D'Estaing stated that he couldn't spend any more time on this goal; so they had to either lift the siege or try to storm the defenses. They chose to go with the latter option.

On the left of the allied army, was a swampy hollow way which afforded a cover for troops advancing on the right flank of the besieged, to a point within fifty yards of their principal work. It was determined to march to the main attack along this hollow; and, at the same time, to direct feints against other parts of the lines.

On the left side of the allied army, there was a muddy hollow path that provided cover for troops moving up the right flank of the besieged, bringing them within fifty yards of their main fortification. It was decided to advance the main attack along this hollow, while also staging decoys against other sections of the lines.

On the morning of the 9th of October, before day, a heavy cannonade and bombardment were commenced from all the batteries, as preliminary to the assault. Unsuccessful attempt to storm it.About three thousand five hundred French, and one thousand Americans, of whom between six and seven hundred were regulars, and the residue militia of Charleston, advanced in three columns, led by D'Estaing and Lincoln, aided by the principal officers of both nations, and made a furious assault on the British lines. Their reception was warmer than had been expected. The fire from the batteries of the besieged reached every part of the columns of the assailants which had emerged from the swamp, and did great execution. Yet the allied[Pg 145] troops advanced with unabated ardour, passed through the abattis, crossed the ditch, and mounted the parapet. Both the French and Americans planted their standards on the walls, and were killed in great numbers, while endeavouring to force their way into the works. For about fifty minutes, the contest was extremely obstinate. At length, the columns of the assailants began to relax, and a pause was manifested in the assault.

On the morning of October 9th, before dawn, a heavy barrage of cannon fire and bombardment began from all the batteries, serving as a lead-up to the attack. Failed attempt to storm it. About three thousand five hundred French soldiers and one thousand Americans, including around six to seven hundred regulars and the rest being militia from Charleston, advanced in three columns, led by D'Estaing and Lincoln, with support from key officers of both nations, and launched a fierce assault on the British lines. Their welcome was much stronger than expected. The fire from the besieged batteries hit every part of the attacking columns that had emerged from the swamp, causing significant casualties. Still, the allied[Pg 145] troops pressed on with unwavering determination, pushed through the obstacles, crossed the ditch, and climbed the parapet. Both the French and Americans raised their flags on the walls and suffered heavy losses while trying to break into the defenses. For about fifty minutes, the fighting was incredibly fierce. Eventually, the attacking columns began to weaken, and a lull appeared in the assault.

In this critical moment, Major Glaziers, at the head of a body of grenadiers and marines, rushing suddenly from the lines, threw himself on those who had made their way into the redoubts, and drove them over the ditch and abattis into the hollow which they had marched to the attack. It became apparent that farther perseverance could produce no advantage, and a retreat was ordered.

In this critical moment, Major Glaziers, leading a group of grenadiers and marines, suddenly charged from the lines, attacking those who had entered the redoubts and forcing them over the ditch and barricades into the low ground they had marched from to launch the attack. It became clear that continuing further would yield no benefits, and a retreat was ordered.

In this unsuccessful attempt, the French lost in killed and wounded, about seven hundred men. Among the latter, were the Count D'Estaing himself, Major General De Fontanges, and several other officers of distinction. The continental troops lost two hundred and thirty-four men, and the Charleston militia, who, though associated with them in danger, were more fortunate, had one captain killed, and six privates wounded.

In this failed attempt, the French lost around seven hundred men in killed and wounded. Among the wounded were Count D'Estaing himself, Major General De Fontanges, and several other notable officers. The Continental troops lost two hundred and thirty-four men, while the Charleston militia, although sharing the same risks, were more fortunate with one captain killed and six privates wounded.

The loss of the garrison was astonishingly small. In killed and wounded, it amounted only[Pg 146] to fifty-five. So great was the advantage of the cover afforded by their works.

The loss of the garrison was surprisingly minimal. In terms of casualties, it totaled only[Pg 146] fifty-five. The protection provided by their fortifications was incredibly effective.

The siege raised.

After this repulse, the Count D'Estaing announced to General Lincoln, his determination to raise the siege. The remonstrances of that officer were ineffectual; and the removal of the heavy ordnance and stores was commenced. This being accomplished, both armies moved from their ground on the evening of October 18.the 18th of October. The Americans, recrossing the Savannah at Zubly's Ferry, again encamped in South Carolina, and the French re-embarked.

After this setback, Count D'Estaing informed General Lincoln of his decision to lift the siege. Lincoln's objections had no effect, and the removal of the heavy artillery and supplies began. Once that was finished, both armies left their positions on the evening of October 18th. the 18th of October. The Americans crossed back over the Savannah at Zubly's Ferry, set up camp in South Carolina again, and the French re-embarked.

Although the issue of this enterprise was the source of severe chagrin and mortification, the prudence of General Lincoln suppressed every appearance of dissatisfaction, and the armies separated with manifestations of reciprocal esteem.

Although the outcome of this venture caused a lot of disappointment and embarrassment, General Lincoln’s carefulness kept any signs of dissatisfaction under control, and the armies parted ways with clear signs of mutual respect.

The hopes which had brought the militia into the field being disappointed, they dispersed; and the affairs of the southern states wore a more gloomy aspect than at any former period.

The hopes that had motivated the militia to join the fight were dashed, so they scattered; and the situation in the southern states looked more bleak than ever before.

On receiving intelligence of the situation of Lincoln, congress passed a resolution requesting General Washington to order the North Carolina troops, and such others as could be spared from the northern army, to the aid of that in the south; and assuring the states of South Carolina and Georgia of the attention of government to their preservation; but requesting them, for their own defence, to comply with the recommenda[Pg 147]tions formerly made respecting the completion of their continental regiments, and the government of their militia while in actual service.

Upon learning about Lincoln's situation, Congress passed a resolution asking General Washington to send the North Carolina troops, along with any others that could be spared from the northern army, to help in the south. They also assured the states of South Carolina and Georgia that the government was focused on their safety, but requested that, for their own protection, they follow the earlier recommendations regarding the completion of their continental regiments and the management of their militia while on active duty.

During these transactions in the south, the long meditated expedition against the Indians was prosecuted with success.

During these dealings in the south, the long-planned expedition against the Indigenous people was carried out successfully.

The largest division of the western army was to assemble at Wyoming, on the main branch of the Susquehanna, and General Sullivan expected to leave that place in the month of June. Such, however, were the delays in procuring provisions and military stores, that it was the last of July[20] before he could move from the place of rendezvous.

The largest division of the western army was set to gather at Wyoming, on the main branch of the Susquehanna River, and General Sullivan planned to leave that location in June. However, due to delays in getting supplies and military equipment, he was unable to move from the meeting point until the end of July[20].

Another body of troops, designed to compose a part of the western army, had passed the winter on the Mohawk. August.On the 22d of August, these two divisions united, and the whole army, amounting to five thousand men, marched up the Tyoga, which led into the heart of the Indian country.

Another group of troops, meant to be part of the western army, had spent the winter on the Mohawk. August. On August 22nd, these two divisions came together, and the entire army, totaling five thousand men, marched up the Tyoga, which led into the center of Indian territory.

Such extensive and tedious preparations could not be made unobserved. The plan of opera[Pg 148]tions contemplated by Sullivan seems to have been completely understood; and, notwithstanding the vast superiority of his force, the Indians determined to defend their country. They resolved to risk a general action for its preservation, and selected the ground for the conflict with judgment.

Such extensive and tedious preparations couldn't go unnoticed. The plan of operations outlined by Sullivan seems to have been fully understood; and despite the overwhelming strength of his forces, the Indians decided to defend their land. They chose to risk a full-scale battle to protect it and carefully selected the location for the conflict.

About a mile in front of Newtown, they collected their whole force, estimated by General Sullivan at fifteen hundred men, but by themselves at only eight hundred, commanded by the two Butlers, Grey, Johnson, M'Donald, and Brandt. Five companies of whites, calculated at two hundred men, were united with them. They had constructed a breast-work about half a mile in length, on a piece of rising ground. The right flank of this work was covered by the river, which, bending to the right, and winding round their rear, exposed only their front and left to an attack. On the left, was a high ridge nearly parallel to the general course of the river, terminating somewhat below the breast-work; and still farther to the left, was another ridge running in the same direction, and leading to the rear of the American army. The ground was covered with pine interspersed with low shrub-oaks, many of which, for the purpose of concealing their works, had been cut up and stuck in front of them, so as to exhibit the appearance of being still growing. The road, after crossing a deep brook at the foot of the hill, turned to the[Pg 149] right, and ran nearly parallel to the breast-work, so as to expose the whole flank of the army to their fire, if it should advance without discovering their position.

About a mile in front of Newtown, they gathered their entire force, which General Sullivan estimated at fifteen hundred men, while they believed it was only eight hundred, led by the two Butlers, Grey, Johnson, McDonald, and Brandt. They joined forces with five companies of white soldiers, totaling around two hundred men. They built a barricade about half a mile long on a rising piece of land. The right side of this fortification was protected by the river, which bent to the right and curled around their rear, leaving only their front and left side vulnerable to an attack. On the left, there was a high ridge running almost parallel to the river, ending just below the barricade; further to the left was another ridge going in the same direction, leading to the back of the American army. The ground was covered with pine trees mixed with low scrub oaks, many of which were cut and placed in front of them to hide their defenses, making it look like they were still growing. After crossing a deep stream at the foot of the hill, the road turned to the[Pg 149] right and ran nearly parallel to the barricade, potentially exposing the whole side of the army to their fire if they advanced without realizing where they were positioned.

Parties communicating with each other were stationed on both hills, so as to fall on the right flank and rear of Sullivan, as soon as the action should commence.

Parties talking to each other were positioned on both hills, ready to attack the right flank and rear of Sullivan as soon as the action started.

August.

About eleven in the morning of the 29th of August, this work was discovered by Major Par, who commanded the advance guard of the army; upon which, General Hand formed the light infantry in a wood, about four hundred yards distant from the enemy, and stood upon his ground until the main body should arrive. In the mean time, a continual skirmishing was kept up between Par's rifle corps, and small parties of Indians who sallied from their works, and suddenly retreated, apparently with the hope of being incautiously pursued.

About eleven in the morning on August 29th, Major Par, who led the army's advance guard, discovered this operation; as a result, General Hand positioned the light infantry in a wooded area about four hundred yards from the enemy and held his ground until the main forces arrived. In the meantime, there was ongoing skirmishing between Par's rifle corps and small groups of Indians who emerged from their positions and then quickly retreated, seemingly hoping to lure them into an unguarded pursuit.

Conjecturing that the hills on his right were occupied by the savages, Sullivan ordered General Poor to take possession of that which led into his rear, and, thence, to turn the left, and gain the rear, of the breast-work; while Hand, aided by the artillery, should attack in front. These orders were promptly executed. While the artillery played on the works, Poor pushed up the mountain, and a sharp conflict commenced, which was sustained for some time, with considerable spirit on both sides. Poor con[Pg 150]tinued to advance rapidly, pressing the Indians before him at the point of the bayonet, and occasionally firing on them. They retreated from tree to tree, keeping up an irregular fire, until he gained the summit of the hill. Perceiving that their flank was completely uncovered by this movement, and that they were in danger of being surrounded, the savages abandoned their breast-work, and, crossing the river, fled with the utmost precipitation.

Conjecturing that the hills on his right were occupied by the savages, Sullivan ordered General Poor to secure the area that led into his rear, and then to turn left and gain the rear of the breastwork; meanwhile, Hand, supported by the artillery, would attack from the front. These orders were quickly carried out. While the artillery targeted the defenses, Poor advanced up the mountain, and a fierce battle broke out, lasting for some time, with significant intensity on both sides. Poor continued to move forward rapidly, pushing the Indians back with the point of his bayonet and occasionally shooting at them. They retreated from tree to tree, maintaining an irregular gunfire, until he reached the top of the hill. Realizing that their flank was completely unprotected by this maneuver and that they risked being surrounded, the savages abandoned their breastwork and, crossing the river, fled as fast as they could.

Victory of General Sullivan at Newtown.

This victory cost the Americans about thirty men. The ascertained loss of the Indians was also inconsiderable. But they were so intimidated, that every idea of farther resistance was abandoned. As Sullivan advanced, they continued to retreat before him without harassing his main body, or even skirmishing with his detachments, except in a single instance.

This victory cost the Americans about thirty men. The confirmed loss of the Indians was also minimal. However, they were so frightened that any thought of further resistance was given up. As Sullivan moved forward, they kept retreating without bothering his main group or even skirmishing with his smaller units, except for one instance.

He penetrated far into the heart of their country, which his parties scoured, and laid waste in every direction. Houses, corn-fields, gardens, and fruit trees, shared one common fate; and Sullivan executed strictly the severe but necessary orders he had received, to render the country completely uninhabitable for the present, and thus to compel the hostile Indians, by want of food, to remove to a greater distance.

He ventured deep into the heart of their territory, where his groups searched everywhere and destroyed everything in sight. Houses, fields of crops, gardens, and fruit trees all met the same fate; and Sullivan strictly carried out the harsh but necessary orders he had been given to make the area completely unlivable for now, forcing the opposing Indians, due to lack of food, to move further away.

The objects of the expedition being accomplished, Sullivan returned to Easton in[Pg 151] Pennsylvania, having lost only forty men by sickness and the enemy.

The goals of the expedition achieved, Sullivan returned to Easton in[Pg 151] Pennsylvania, having lost only forty men to illness and the enemy.

The devastation of the country has been spoken of with some degree of disapprobation; but this sentiment is the result rather of an amiable disposition in the human mind to condemn whatever may have the appearance of tending to aggravate the miseries of war, than of reflection. Circumstances existed which reconciled to humanity this seeming departure from it. Great Britain possessed advantages which ensured a controlling influence over the Indians, and kept them in almost continual war with the United States. Their habitual ferocity seemed to have derived increased virulence from the malignity of the whites who had taken refuge among them; and there was real foundation for the opinion that an annual repetition of the horrors of Wyoming could be prevented only by disabling the savages from perpetrating them. No means in the power of the United States promised so certainly to effect this desirable object, as the removal of neighbours whose hostility could be diminished only by terror, and whose resentments were to be assuaged only by fear.

The devastation of the country has been talked about with some criticism; however, this feeling comes more from a natural human tendency to condemn anything that seems to worsen the suffering of war rather than from deep thought. There were circumstances that made this apparent deviation from humanity more acceptable. Great Britain had advantages that ensured they could control the Indians, keeping them in almost constant conflict with the United States. Their usual brutality appeared to be intensified by the hostility of the whites who had taken refuge among them; and there was a real basis for the belief that the annual recurrence of the horrors of Wyoming could only be stopped by preventing the natives from committing such acts. No means available to the United States seemed more likely to achieve this goal than removing neighbors whose hostility could only be reduced through fear, and whose resentment could only be calmed by terror.

While Sullivan laid waste the country on the Susquehanna, another expedition under Colonel Brodhead, was carried on from Pittsburg up the Alleghany, against the Mingo, Munscy, and Seneca tribes. At the head of between six and[Pg 152] seven hundred men, he advanced two hundred miles up the river, and destroyed the villages and corn-fields on its head branches. Here too the Indians were unable to resist the invading army.

While Sullivan devastated the area along the Susquehanna River, another mission led by Colonel Brodhead was taking place from Pittsburgh up the Allegheny River, targeting the Mingo, Munsee, and Seneca tribes. Leading a force of around six to seven hundred men, he progressed two hundred miles up the river and destroyed the villages and cornfields along its tributaries. Once again, the Native Americans could not fend off the invading army.

After one unsuccessful skirmish, they abandoned their villages to a destruction which was inevitable, and sought for personal safety in their woods.

After one failed fight, they left their villages to face destruction that was unavoidable, and looked for personal safety in the woods.

On receiving the communications of General Sullivan, congress passed a vote approving his conduct, and that of his army. That approbation, however, seems not to have extended beyond his conduct in the Indian country. His demands for military stores for the expedition had been so high; in his conversations with his officers, he had so freely censured the government for its failure to comply with those demands; in general orders, he had so openly complained of inattention to the preparations necessary to secure the success of the enterprise; that considerable offence was given to several members of congress, and still more to the board of war. From the operation of these causes, when Sullivan, at the close of the campaign, complained of ill health, and offered, on that account, to resign his commission, the endeavours of his friends to obtain a vote requesting him to continue in the service, and permitting him to retire from actual duty until his health should be restored, were overruled; and[Pg 153] his resignation was accepted. The resolution permitting him to resign was, however, accompanied with one thanking him for his past services.

Upon receiving General Sullivan's communications, Congress voted to approve his actions and those of his army. However, this approval seemed to only cover his conduct in the Indian territory. His requests for military supplies for the mission were extremely high; in discussions with his officers, he openly criticized the government for not meeting those requests; in general orders, he openly complained about the lack of attention to the preparations needed to ensure the mission's success, which offended several members of Congress and even more so the Board of War. Due to these factors, when Sullivan, at the end of the campaign, reported feeling unwell and offered to resign his commission because of it, his friends' efforts to secure a vote asking him to stay in service, while allowing him to step back from active duty until he recovered, were rejected, and[Pg 153] his resignation was accepted. However, the resolution allowing him to resign came with a message thanking him for his previous services.

Although these great exertions to terminate Indian hostility did not afford complete security to the western frontiers, they were attended with considerable advantages. The savages, though not subdued, were intimidated; and their incursions became less formidable, as well as less frequent.

Although these significant efforts to end Indian hostility didn't provide total security to the western frontiers, they had considerable advantages. The Native Americans, while not defeated, were intimidated; their attacks became less threatening and less frequent.

The summer of 1779 passed away without furnishing any circumstance in America which could be supposed to have a material influence on the issue of the war. In Europe, however, an event took place which had been long anxiously expected, and was believed to be of decisive importance. Spain at length determined to make one common cause with France against Great Britain. It was supposed that the two powers would be able to obtain a complete ascendency at sea; and that their combined fleets would maintain a superiority on the American coast, as well as in Europe.

The summer of 1779 passed without any significant events in America that could impact the outcome of the war. However, in Europe, a long-awaited event occurred that was thought to be crucial. Spain finally decided to join forces with France against Great Britain. It was believed that the two nations would gain full control at sea and that their combined fleets would establish dominance on the American coast as well as in Europe.

From the first determination of France to take part in the war, it appears to have been the earnest wish of the cabinet of Versailles to engage Spain likewise in the contest.

From the moment France decided to join the war, it seems the Versailles cabinet genuinely wanted to involve Spain in the conflict as well.

Her resentments against England, her solicitude to diminish the naval strength of that nation, and her wish to recover Jamaica, Gibraltar,[Pg 154] and the Floridas, urged her to seize the fair occasion now offered of dismembering the British empire, and accomplishing these favourite objects. But her dread of the effect which the independence of the United States might produce on her own colonies, mingled with some apprehensions of danger from the contest she was about to provoke, had produced an appearance of irresolution, which rendered her future course, for a time, uncertain. In this conflict of opposite interests, the influence of the cabinet of Versailles, and the jealousy of the naval power of Britain, at length obtained the victory; and his Catholic Majesty determined to prevent the reannexation of the United States to their mother country; but to effect this object by negotiation rather than by the sword.

Her resentment toward England, her desire to weaken that nation's naval strength, and her intention to reclaim Jamaica, Gibraltar,[Pg 154] and the Floridas pushed her to take advantage of the opportunity to break up the British empire and achieve these goals. However, her fear of how the independence of the United States might impact her own colonies, along with some concerns about the risks of the conflict she was about to start, led to a sense of indecision that made her future actions uncertain for a while. In this clash of opposing interests, the influence of the Versailles cabinet and the rivalry with Britain's naval power ultimately prevailed; and his Catholic Majesty decided to prevent the reannexation of the United States to their mother country, choosing to pursue this goal through negotiation instead of armed conflict.

Spain offers her mediation to the belligerent powers.

In pursuance of this pacific system, he offered his mediation to the belligerent powers. This proposition was readily accepted by France; but the minister of his Britannic Majesty evaded any explicit arrangements on the subject, while he continued to make general verbal declarations of the willingness of his sovereign to give peace to Europe under the mediation of his Catholic Majesty. In consequence of these declarations, the Spanish minister proposed a truce for a term of years, and that a congress of deputies from the belligerent powers should assemble at Madrid to adjust the terms of a permanent treaty; into which deputies from the United[Pg 155] States were to be admitted, as the representatives of a sovereign nation. Although an explicit acknowledgment of their independence was not to be required, it was to be understood that they should be independent in fact, and should be completely separated from the British empire.

In pursuit of this peaceful approach, he offered to mediate between the warring powers. France quickly accepted this proposal; however, the minister of His Britannic Majesty avoided making any clear arrangements on the matter, while still making vague verbal statements about his king’s willingness to bring peace to Europe through the mediation of his Catholic Majesty. As a result of these statements, the Spanish minister suggested a truce for a number of years, and that a congress of representatives from the warring powers should gather in Madrid to negotiate the terms of a permanent treaty; representatives from the United[Pg 155] States were to be included as the representatives of a sovereign nation. Although an explicit acknowledgment of their independence wasn’t required, it was understood that they should essentially be independent and completely separate from the British Empire.

This negotiation was protracted to a considerable length; and in the mean time, all the address of the cabinet of London was used to detach either France or the United States from their alliance with each other. Notice of it was given to the American government by the minister of France at Philadelphia, as well as by Mr. Arthur Lee, one of their agents in Europe; and congress was repeatedly urged by the former, to furnish those who might be authorized to represent them in the conferences for a general treaty, with ample powers and instructions to conclude it. An extraordinary degree of solicitude was manifested to hasten the full powers, and to moderate the claims of the United States.

This negotiation dragged on for a long time, and during that period, all the efforts of the London cabinet were focused on trying to separate France or the United States from their alliance. The American government was informed by the French minister in Philadelphia, as well as by Mr. Arthur Lee, one of their agents in Europe. The former repeatedly urged Congress to give those who were authorized to represent them in conferences for a general treaty the necessary powers and instructions to finalize it. There was a noticeable urgency to speed up the granting of full powers and to ease the claims of the United States.

It seems to have been the policy of the cabinet of Versailles to exclude the American States from a share of the fisheries, and to limit their western boundary to the settlements then made. Either from a real apprehension that the war might be protracted should the United States insist on the acknowledgment of their independence as a preliminary to any treaty, or from an[Pg 156] opinion that such preliminary acknowledgment would leave the terms of the treaty less under the control of France, and the American plenipotentiaries more masters of their own conduct, Monsieur Girard laboured to persuade congress to recede from that demand. If they could be independent in fact, he thought the form not worth contending for.[21]

It seems that the government in Versailles had a policy to keep the American states from participating in the fisheries and to limit their western boundary to the settlements that already existed. This might have been due to a genuine fear that the war would drag on if the United States insisted on being recognized as independent before any treaty was made, or from the belief that such recognition would give them less control over the treaty terms while making the American representatives more in charge of their actions. Monsieur Girard worked to convince Congress to drop that demand. He believed that if they could be independent in reality, then the formal acknowledgment wasn't worth fighting for.[21]

While congress was employed in debating the instructions to their ministers, the negotiation was brought to a close. As Spain became prepared for hostilities, the offered mediation was pressed in such terms as to produce the necessity of either accepting or rejecting it. This drew from the cabinet of London a declaration that the independence of the United States was inadmissible; upon which his Catholic Majesty determined to take part in the war.

While Congress was busy debating the instructions for their ministers, the negotiation came to an end. As Spain got ready for conflict, the proposed mediation was pushed in a way that required a decision to either accept or reject it. This prompted the British cabinet to declare that the independence of the United States was unacceptable, leading his Catholic Majesty to decide to join the war.

War between Spain and England.

On the departure of his minister from London without taking leave, the British government issued letters of marque and reprisal against the vessels and subjects of the Spanish crown; and a powerful Spanish fleet, which had been preparing during the negotiation, was expedited, to co-operate with that of France. Yet the independence of the United States was not acknowledged, nor was their minister accredited. Despatches, giving notice of the hostilities medi[Pg 157]tated by his Catholic Majesty, were forwarded to Don Galvez, the governor of Louisiana, who collected a considerable military force at New Orleans, and reduced the settlements held by the British crown on the Mississippi, which had not been apprised of the war.

On the minister's departure from London without saying goodbye, the British government issued letters of marque and reprisal against the ships and citizens of the Spanish crown. A strong Spanish fleet, which had been getting ready during the negotiations, was sent out to work alongside the French fleet. However, the independence of the United States was still not recognized, nor was their minister officially accepted. Reports detailing the hostilities encouraged by his Catholic Majesty were sent to Don Galvez, the governor of Louisiana, who gathered a significant military force in New Orleans and took control of the British-held settlements along the Mississippi, which were unaware of the war.

Intelligence of this important event was given to congress while that body was deliberating on the instructions to their negotiators. It is not impossible that this information had some influence on those deliberations; and, rendering the American government less solicitous about the future conduct of Spain, diminished the motives for making territorial sacrifices to that power. Their ministers were ordered to make it a preliminary article to any negotiation, that Great Britain should agree to treat with the United States, as sovereign, free, and independent; and that their independence should be expressly assured and confirmed by the terms of the treaty itself.

Intelligence about this important event was shared with Congress while they were discussing the instructions for their negotiators. It’s possible that this information had some impact on those discussions and made the American government less concerned about Spain’s future actions, reducing the reasons to give up territory to that country. Their ministers were instructed to insist that any negotiations include a preliminary agreement that Great Britain would recognize the United States as a sovereign, free, and independent nation, and that their independence would be explicitly guaranteed in the terms of the treaty itself.

That the United States might be enabled to avail themselves without further delays, of any occasion which might be presented for terminating the war, Mr. John Adams, who was already in Europe, was authorized to negotiate a treaty of peace, and a commercial treaty with Great Britain; and Mr. Jay, at that time president of congress, was appointed minister plenipotentiary to the court of Madrid, with instructions to insist on the free navigation of the Mississippi;[Pg 158]—a claim to which Spain objected, and which was discountenanced by France.

To allow the United States to take advantage of any opportunity to end the war without further delays, Mr. John Adams, who was already in Europe, was authorized to negotiate a peace treaty and a commercial treaty with Great Britain. Mr. Jay, then president of Congress, was appointed as the minister plenipotentiary to the court of Madrid, with instructions to demand free navigation of the Mississippi. This was a claim that Spain opposed and which France did not support.[Pg 158]

As the campaign drew to a close without affording any solid foundation for the hope that the war was about to terminate, General Washington repeated those efforts which he had made so often and so unsuccessfully, to induce early preparations for the ensuing year. He submitted to the view of his government a detailed report of the whole army, which exhibited the alarming fact, that by the last of the following June, the terms of service of nearly one-half the men under his command would expire.

As the campaign came to an end without giving any real reason to believe that the war was about to finish, General Washington repeated his previous attempts to get early preparations in place for the next year, which had been unsuccessful before. He presented a detailed report of the entire army to his government, showing the concerning fact that by the end of the following June, the service terms for nearly half of the soldiers under his command would be up.

It was not the least considerable of the inconveniences attending the complex system of government then prevailing in the United States, that measures essential to the safety of the nation were never taken in season. Thus, when the time for raising the quotas of the respective states by voluntary enlistment had passed away, and the necessity of resorting to coercive means had become absolute, those means were so delayed, and so irregularly put in execution, that the terms of service of different portions of the army expired almost every month in the year; and raw troops, ignorant of the first rudiments of military duty, were introduced in the most critical moments of a campaign. Had timely and correspondent measures been taken by the states to raise their respective quotas by a specified time in the depth of win[Pg 159]ter, the recruits would have received the advantage of a few months training before they were brought into actual service, and the General, that of a certain uninterrupted force for each campaign. This course of proceeding had been continually recommended, and the recommendation had been as continually neglected.

It was one of the significant drawbacks of the complicated government system in place in the United States at that time that crucial measures for the nation's safety were never taken in a timely manner. When the opportunity to raise state quotas through voluntary enlistment had passed, and it became necessary to use force, those actions were so delayed and implemented so inconsistently that different parts of the army saw their service terms expire almost every month of the year. This led to inexperienced troops, who didn’t even know the basics of military duty, being thrown into the most critical moments of a campaign. If the states had taken timely actions to raise their quotas by a set deadline during the depths of win[Pg 159]ter, the recruits would have had the benefit of a few months of training before being deployed, and the General would have had a reliable force for each campaign. This approach had been repeatedly suggested, but the suggestions were consistently ignored.

Letter from General Washington to Congress.

"In the more early stages of the contest," said the Commander-in-chief to congress, in a letter of the 8th of November, "when men might have been enlisted for the war, no man, as my whole conduct, and the uniform tenor of my letters will evince, was ever more opposed to short enlistments than I was; and while there remained a prospect of obtaining recruits on a permanent footing in the first instance, as far as duty and a regard to my station would permit, I urged my sentiments in favour of it. But the prospect of keeping up an army by voluntary enlistments being changed, or at least standing on too precarious and uncertain a footing to depend on for the exigency of our affairs, I took the liberty in February, 1778, in a particular manner, to lay before the committee of arrangement then with the army at Valley Forge, a plan for an annual draught, as the surest and most certain, if not the only means left us, of maintaining the army on a proper and respectable ground. And, more and more confirmed in the propriety of this opinion by the intervention of a variety of circumstances, unnecessary to detail, I again took[Pg 160] the freedom of urging the plan to the committee of conference in January last; and, having reviewed it in every point of light, and found it right, at least the best that has occurred to me, I hope I shall be excused by congress in offering it to them, and in time for carrying into execution for the next year; if they should conceive it necessary for the states to complete their quotas of troops.

"In the earlier stages of the contest," said the Commander-in-chief to Congress in a letter dated November 8th, "when men could have been recruited for the war, no one, as my entire conduct and the consistent tone of my letters will show, was more against short enlistments than I was; and while there was still a chance to secure recruits on a more permanent basis, as much as my duty and position allowed, I expressed my thoughts in favor of it. However, when the possibility of maintaining an army through voluntary enlistments changed, or became uncertain and unreliable for the urgent needs we faced, I took the initiative in February 1778 to present a plan for an annual draft to the committee of arrangement that was with the army at Valley Forge, as the most reliable means, if not the only way, to keep the army well-maintained and respectable. More convinced of the validity of this view due to various circumstances, which I won’t detail, I once again took the liberty of promoting the plan to the committee of conference last January; and after reviewing it from every angle and determining it to be right, at least the best option I could think of, I hope to receive Congress's understanding in presenting it to them, and in time for it to be implemented for the next year, should they see it necessary for the states to fulfill their troop quotas."

"The plan I would propose is, that each state be informed by congress annually of the real deficiency of its troops, and called upon to make it up, or such less specific number as congress may think proper, by a draught. That the men draughted join the army by the first of January, and serve until the first of January in the succeeding year. That from the time the draughts join the army, the officers of the states from which they come, be authorized and directed to use their endeavours to enlist them for the war, under the bounties granted to the officers themselves, and to the recruits, by the act of the 23d of January, 1779, viz: ten dollars to the officer for each recruit, and two hundred to the recruits themselves. That all state, county, and town bounties to draughts, if practicable, be entirely abolished, on account of the uneasiness and disorders they create among the soldiery, the desertions they produce, and for other reasons which will readily occur. That on or before the first of October annually, an abstract, or re[Pg 161]turn, similar to the present one, be transmitted to congress, to enable them to make their requisitions to each state with certainty and precision. This I would propose as a general plan to be pursued; and I am persuaded that this, or one nearly similar to it, will be found the best now in our power, as it will be attended with the least expense to the public, will place the service on the footing of order and certainty, and will be the only one that can advance the general interest to any great extent."

"The plan I propose is that each state is informed by Congress every year about the actual shortage of its troops and asked to fill it, or a smaller number as Congress may deem appropriate, through a draft. The drafted men should join the army by January 1st and serve until January 1st of the following year. From the time the draftees join the army, the officers from their states should be authorized and directed to try to enlist them for the war, under the incentives provided to the officers and recruits by the act of January 23, 1779, which offers ten dollars to the officer for each recruit and two hundred dollars to the recruits themselves. All state, county, and town bounties for draftees should be completely eliminated if possible, due to the unrest and disorder they cause among the soldiers, the desertions they result in, and other reasons that will be obvious. That on or before October 1st each year, a summary or re[Pg 161]turn, similar to the current one, is sent to Congress, allowing them to make their requests to each state with accuracy and clarity. This is what I would propose as a general plan to follow; I believe that this, or something very similar, will be the best option available to us now, as it will incur the least cost to the public, establish order and certainty in the service, and will be the only approach that can significantly advance the overall interest."

These representations on the part of the Commander-in-chief were not more successful than those which had before been made. Although the best dispositions existed in congress, the proceedings of that body were unavoidably slow; and the difficulty of effecting a concert of measures among thirteen sovereign states, was too great to be surmounted. In consequence of these radical defects in the system itself, the contributions of men made by the states continued to be irregular, uncertain, and out of season; and the army could never acquire that consistency and stability, which would have resulted from an exact observance of the plan so often recommended.

These attempts by the Commander-in-chief weren't any more successful than previous ones. Even with the best intentions in Congress, their actions were inevitably slow, and coordinating efforts among thirteen independent states was too challenging to overcome. Because of these fundamental issues in the system, the states' contributions of men remained inconsistent, unreliable, and poorly timed; as a result, the army could never achieve the consistency and stability that would have come from strictly following the repeatedly suggested plan.

On receiving information of the disaster which had been sustained by the allied arms at Savannah, Sir Henry Clinton resumed his plan of active operations against the southern states. A large embarkation took place soon after that[Pg 162] event had been announced to him, which sailed from the Hook towards the end of December. The troops were commanded by himself in person, and the fleet by Admiral Arbuthnot. The defence of New York and its dependencies were entrusted to General Knyphausen.

Upon learning about the loss suffered by the allied forces at Savannah, Sir Henry Clinton restarted his plan for active operations in the southern states. A significant troop deployment happened shortly after that[Pg 162] event was reported to him, which set sail from the Hook toward the end of December. Clinton personally commanded the troops, while Admiral Arbuthnot led the fleet. The defense of New York and its surrounding areas was assigned to General Knyphausen.

The preparations made in New York for some distant enterprise were immediately communicated by his faithful intelligencers to General Washington, who conjectured its object, and hastened the march of the troops designed to reinforce General Lincoln.

The preparations happening in New York for a distant mission were quickly reported by his loyal informants to General Washington, who guessed its purpose and sped up the movement of the troops meant to support General Lincoln.

The season for action in a northern climate being over, the General turned his attention to the distribution of his troops in winter quarters. Habit had familiarized the American army to the use of huts constructed by themselves; and both officers and men were content to pass the winter in a hutted camp. In disposing of the troops, therefore, until the time for action should return, wood and water, a healthy situation, convenience for supplies of provisions, stations which would enable them to cover the country, and to defend particular positions, were the objects taken into consideration, and were all to be consulted.

The season for action in the northern climate was over, so the General focused on organizing his troops for winter quarters. The American army was used to building their own huts, and both the officers and men were fine with spending the winter in a camp of huts. Therefore, in arranging the troops until action resumed, they considered access to wood and water, a healthy location, convenience for supplies, and positions that would allow them to cover the area and defend specific spots. All these factors were taken into account.

The American army goes into winter quarters.

With a view to these various circumstances, the army was thrown into two great divisions. The northern was to be commanded by General Heath; and its chief object was the security of West Point, and of the posts on the North[Pg 163] River, as low as King's Ferry. Subordinate to this, was the protection of the country on the Sound, and down the Hudson to the neighbourhood of Kingsbridge. The other and principal division, under the immediate command of General Washington, was put under cover, late in December, in the neighbourhood of Morristown.

Considering these various circumstances, the army was split into two main divisions. The northern division was led by General Heath, and its primary goal was to secure West Point and the posts along the North[Pg 163] River, down to King's Ferry. An additional focus was to protect the area around the Sound and along the Hudson River, near Kingsbridge. The other main division, directly commanded by General Washington, was sheltered late in December near Morristown.


CHAPTER VI.

South Carolina invaded.... The British fleet passes the bar, and gets possession of the harbour of Charleston.... Opinion of General Washington on the propriety of defending that place.... Sir Henry Clinton invests the town.... Tarlton surprises an American corps at Monk's Corner.... Fort Moultrie surrendered.... Tarlton defeats Colonel White.... General Lincoln capitulates.... Buford defeated.... Arrangements for the government of South Carolina and Georgia.... Sir Henry Clinton embarks for New York.... General Gates takes command of the Southern army.... Is defeated near Camden.... Death of De Kalb.... Success of General Sumpter.... He is defeated.

South Carolina was invaded.... The British fleet crosses the bar and takes control of the Charleston harbor.... General Washington's views on whether to defend that location.... Sir Henry Clinton surrounds the town.... Tarleton surprises an American unit at Monk's Corner.... Fort Moultrie surrenders.... Tarleton defeats Colonel White.... General Lincoln surrenders.... Buford is defeated.... Plans for the governance of South Carolina and Georgia.... Sir Henry Clinton sets sail for New York.... General Gates assumes command of the Southern army.... He is defeated near Camden.... Death of De Kalb.... General Sumpter achieves success.... He is ultimately defeated.

 

1780.

The departure of the French fleet produced a sudden change in the prospects of the southern states. The sanguine hopes which had been entertained of the recovery of Georgia, gave place to gloomy and well founded apprehensions for South Carolina.

The departure of the French fleet caused an abrupt shift in the outlook for the southern states. The optimistic hopes for the recovery of Georgia were replaced by dark and realistic fears for South Carolina.

The facility with which General Prevost had passed through the state, and the assurances he had received of the indisposition of a large portion of the people to defend themselves, disclosed too certainly the true situation of the country, not to convince all discerning men that a real attempt at conquest would be made the ensuing year. General Lincoln perceived the approaching danger, without being able to provide against it. His power, as a military com[Pg 165]mander, was too limited, and his influence on the government of the state too weak, to draw forth even the means it possessed in time for its protection.

The ease with which General Prevost moved through the state and the reports he got about many people being unwilling to defend themselves clearly revealed the actual situation in the country, convincing all perceptive individuals that a genuine attempt to conquer would happen the following year. General Lincoln recognized the looming threat but couldn't effectively prepare for it. His authority as a military leader was too restricted, and his influence over the state government was too weak to mobilize even the resources it had in time for its defense.

Though the preservation of its metropolis was of vast importance to the state, no preparations were making to put it in a condition to stand a siege. The forts on the islands were in ruins, and the works across the neck remained unfinished. The representations made on this subject to the governor by General Lincoln were not disregarded; but from some defect in the existing law, the executive found it impracticable to obtain labour for these interesting objects.

Though keeping the city safe was extremely important to the state, no plans were being made to prepare it for a siege. The forts on the islands were in ruins, and the construction across the neck was still unfinished. General Lincoln’s warnings about this to the governor were not ignored; however, due to some flaw in the current law, the government found it impossible to secure labor for these crucial projects.

Admiral Arbuthnot arrived at Savannah on the 31st of January. January 23.One of his transports, which had been separated from the fleet in a storm, was brought into Charleston harbour on the 23d of that month; and the prisoners gave the first certain intelligence that the expedition from New York was destined against the capital of South Carolina.

Admiral Arbuthnot arrived in Savannah on January 31. January 23rd. One of his transport ships, which had gotten separated from the fleet during a storm, was brought into Charleston harbor on the 23rd of that month; and the prisoners provided the first reliable information that the expedition from New York was aimed at the capital of South Carolina.

Before the middle of February, the fleet entered the harbour, or inlet, of North Edisto; and landed the troops without opposition on St. John's Island. Sir Henry Clinton invests Charleston.A part of the fleet was sent round to blockade the harbour of Charleston, while the army proceeded slowly and cautiously from Stono Creek to Wappoo Cut, and through the islands of St. John and St. James.[Pg 166]

Before mid-February, the fleet arrived at the harbor, or inlet, of North Edisto and landed the troops on St. John's Island without any resistance. Sir Henry Clinton captures Charleston. Some of the fleet was dispatched to surround the harbor of Charleston, while the army moved slowly and carefully from Stono Creek to Wappoo Cut, navigating through the islands of St. John and St. James.[Pg 166]

This delay, in the event so fatal, but then deemed so propitious to the American arms, was employed to the utmost advantage in improving the defence of Charleston. The legislature had enabled the executive to employ slaves to work on the fortifications; and had passed an act delegating great powers to the Governor and such of his council as he could conveniently consult. Under these acts, six hundred slaves were employed on the works, and vigorous, though not very successful measures were taken by the executive to assemble the militia of the country. The fallacious hope was entertained that, if the town could be rendered defensible, the garrison would be made sufficiently strong by reinforcements from the north, and by the militia of the state, to maintain the place and compel Sir Henry Clinton to raise the siege.

This delay, which turned out to be so fatal but was then seen as beneficial for the American forces, was used to its fullest to strengthen the defense of Charleston. The legislature had authorized the executive to use slaves to work on the fortifications and had passed a law giving significant power to the Governor and his council for consultation. Under these laws, six hundred slaves were put to work on the construction, and the executive took strong, though not very effective, steps to gather the militia from the surrounding areas. There was a misguided hope that if the town could be made defensible, the garrison would be bolstered by reinforcements from the north and by the state’s militia, allowing them to hold the position and force Sir Henry Clinton to lift the siege.

The American army being too weak to make any serious opposition to the progress of the British through the country, the cavalry, with a small corps of infantry, were directed to hover on their left flank; and the other troops, consisting of about fourteen hundred regulars fit for duty, aided by the militia, were drawn into the town, and employed on the works.

The American army was too weak to put up any serious fight against the British as they moved through the country, so the cavalry, along with a small group of infantry, were instructed to stay on their left flank. The other troops, about fourteen hundred regulars ready for duty, supported by the militia, were brought into the town to work on the defenses.

Understanding that great exertions were making to improve the fortifications, and that the garrison was gaining strength, Sir Henry Clinton ordered General Patterson to join him with the troops which could be spared from Georgia,[Pg 167] and directed Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton, after supplying the horses which had been lost during a very stormy voyage from New York, to cover his march through South Carolina. Colonel Washington defeats Tarlton.In one of the excursions of that active officer to disperse the militia who assembled to oppose the progress of Patterson through the country, his cavalry encountered Lieutenant Colonel Washington, who commanded the remnant of Baylor's regiment, and were driven back with some loss; but the want of infantry disabled Washington from pressing his advantage.

Knowing that significant efforts were being made to strengthen the fortifications and that the garrison was becoming more powerful, Sir Henry Clinton instructed General Patterson to join him with the troops that could be released from Georgia,[Pg 167] and ordered Lieutenant Colonel Tarleton, after providing the horses lost during a rough voyage from New York, to secure his march through South Carolina. Colonel Washington beats Tarleton. During one of his missions to scatter the militia that had gathered to resist Patterson's advance, Tarleton's cavalry came across Lieutenant Colonel Washington, who led the remnants of Baylor's regiment, and they were pushed back with some losses; however, Washington's lack of infantry prevented him from capitalizing on his success.

In defending Charleston, the command of the harbour is of great importance. To preserve this advantage, congress had ordered four frigates to South Carolina, which, with the marine force belonging to the state, and two French vessels, were placed under the command of Commodore Whipple.

In defending Charleston, controlling the harbor is crucial. To maintain this advantage, Congress ordered four frigates to South Carolina, which, along with the state's naval forces and two French ships, were put under the command of Commodore Whipple.

General Washington was the more sanguine in the hope of defending the harbour, because it was understood that the bar was impassable by a ship of the line, and that even a large frigate could not be brought over it, without first taking out her guns, or careening her so much that the crew would be unable to work her.

General Washington was more optimistic about defending the harbor because it was understood that the bar was impassable for a ship of the line, and even a large frigate couldn't get over it without first removing her guns or tilting her so much that the crew wouldn't be able to operate her.

On sounding within the bar it was discovered that the water was too shallow for the frigates to act with any effect, and that, in making the attempt, they would be exposed to the fire of the batteries which the assailants had erected.[Pg 168] Under these circumstances, the officers of the navy were unanimously of opinion that no successful opposition could be made at the bar, and that the fleet might act more advantageously in concert with the fort on Sullivan's Island.

On checking the depth of the water at the bar, it was found to be too shallow for the frigates to operate effectively, and trying to do so would leave them vulnerable to the fire from the batteries set up by the attackers.[Pg 168] Given this situation, the navy officers all agreed that they couldn't successfully oppose the bar and that the fleet would be better off coordinating with the fort on Sullivan's Island.

The intention of disputing the passage over the bar being abandoned, Commodore Whipple moored his squadron in a line with fort Moultrie, in a narrow passage between Sullivan's Island and the middle ground; and the British ships, without their guns, passed the bar, and anchored in five fathom hole.

The plan to challenge the passage over the bar was given up, so Commodore Whipple anchored his squadron in a line with Fort Moultrie, in a tight space between Sullivan's Island and the middle ground; meanwhile, the British ships, without their cannons, crossed the bar and anchored in five fathom hole.

It being now thought impossible to prevent the fleet from passing fort Moultrie, and taking such stations in Cooper River as would enable them to rake the batteries on shore, and to close that communication between the town and country, the plan of defence was once more changed, and the armed vessels were carried into the mouth of Cooper River, and sunk in a line from the town to Shute's folly.

It was now believed that stopping the fleet from getting past Fort Moultrie and taking positions in the Cooper River to target the shore batteries was impossible. To address this, the defense strategy was altered again, and the armed ships were moved to the mouth of the Cooper River and sunk in a line from the town to Shute's Folly.

This was the critical moment for evacuating the town. The loss of the harbour rendered the defence of the place, if not desperate, so improbable, that the hope to maintain it, could not have been rationally entertained by a person, who was not deceived by the expectation of aids much more considerable than were actually received.

This was the crucial moment for evacuating the town. The loss of the harbor made defending the place, if not hopeless, so unlikely that anyone who wasn’t misled by the expectation of much more significant help than was actually received couldn’t have realistically thought it was possible to hold on.

Opinion of General Washington on the subject of defending Charleston.

When this state of things was communicated to General Washington, by Lieutenant Colonel[Pg 169] Laurens, he said in reply, "The impracticability of defending the bar, I fear, amounts to the loss of the town and garrison. At this distance it is impossible to judge for you. I have the greatest confidence in General Lincoln's prudence; but it really appears to me, that the propriety of attempting to defend the town, depended on the probability of defending the bar; and that when this ceased, the attempt ought to have been relinquished. In this, however, I suspend a definitive judgment, and wish you to consider what I say as confidential." Unfortunately, this letter did not arrive in time to influence the conduct of the besieged.

When Lieutenant Colonel[Pg 169] Laurens shared this situation with General Washington, he responded, "I’m afraid the impossibility of defending the bar means we’ll lose both the town and the garrison. From this distance, I can’t make a judgment for you. I have great confidence in General Lincoln's judgment; however, it really seems to me that whether we should try to defend the town depended on the chance of defending the bar. Once that chance went away, the attempt should have been abandoned. Nevertheless, I’m holding off on making a final judgment, and I want you to treat what I’m saying as confidential." Unfortunately, this letter arrived too late to affect the actions of those under siege.

April 1.

Having crossed Ashley River, Sir Henry Clinton moved down the neck, and, on the night of the first of April, broke ground within eight hundred yards of the American lines.

Having crossed the Ashley River, Sir Henry Clinton moved down the neck and, on the night of April first, started digging within eight hundred yards of the American lines.

The defences of Charleston had been constructed under the direction of a Mr. Laumay, a French gentleman in the American service; and, although not calculated to resist a regular siege, were far from being contemptible.

The defenses of Charleston were built under the guidance of a Mr. Laumay, a Frenchman serving in the American forces; and, while they weren't designed to withstand a formal siege, they were definitely not to be underestimated.

While the besiegers were employed on their first parallel, the garrison received a considerable reinforcement. General Woodford, who had marched from Morristown in December, entered the town with the old continental troops of the Virginia line, now reduced to seven hundred effectives. General Hogan, with the line of North Carolina, had arrived before him. The[Pg 170] garrison consisted of rather more than two thousand regular troops, of about one thousand North Carolina militia, and of the citizens of Charleston. The exertions of the Governor to bring in the militia of South Carolina had not succeeded.

While the attackers were working on their first line, the garrison received a significant boost in numbers. General Woodford, who had marched from Morristown in December, entered the town with the old continental troops from Virginia, now down to seven hundred effective soldiers. General Hogan, leading the North Carolina troops, had arrived before him. The[Pg 170] garrison consisted of just over two thousand regular troops, around one thousand North Carolina militia, and the citizens of Charleston. The Governor's efforts to gather the militia from South Carolina had not succeeded.

April 9.

By the 9th of April, Sir Henry Clinton completed his first parallel extending across the neck, and mounted his guns in battery. His works formed an oblique line, from six to seven hundred yards distant from those of the besieged. About the same time, Admiral Arbuthnot passed Sullivan's Island, under a heavy and well directed fire from fort Moultrie, then commanded by Colonel Pinckney, and anchored under James' Island near fort Johnson, just out of gunshot of the batteries of the town.

By April 9th, Sir Henry Clinton finished his first trench stretching across the neck and set up his cannons. His defenses formed a slanted line, located six to seven hundred yards away from those of the besieged. Around the same time, Admiral Arbuthnot sailed past Sullivan's Island, facing heavy and accurate fire from Fort Moultrie, which was then under Colonel Pinckney's command, and anchored near James Island close to Fort Johnson, just out of range of the town's batteries.

Being now in complete possession of the harbour, the British General and Admiral sent a joint summons to General Lincoln, demanding the surrender of the town, to which he returned this firm and modest answer. "Sixty days have elapsed since it has been known that your intentions against this town were hostile, in which, time has been afforded to abandon it; but duty and inclination point to the propriety of supporting it to the last extremity."

Being now fully in control of the harbor, the British General and Admiral sent a joint message to General Lincoln, demanding the town's surrender, to which he gave this firm and humble response: "Sixty days have passed since it became clear that your intentions toward this town were hostile, during which time I could have abandoned it; however, my duty and desire guide me to defend it to the very end."

On receiving this answer, the besiegers opened their batteries, but seemed to rely principally on proceeding by sap quite into the American lines.[Pg 171]

On receiving this answer, the attackers opened fire, but seemed to mainly depend on digging a tunnel straight into the American lines.[Pg 171]

About this time, the Governor with half the members of the council, went into the country, in the hope of collecting a respectable force in the rear, and on the left flank of the besieging army. The Lieutenant Governor, and the other members of the council remained in town.

About this time, the Governor and half the council members went out into the countryside, hoping to gather a strong force behind and to the left of the besieging army. The Lieutenant Governor and the other council members stayed in town.

Hitherto, Sir Henry Clinton had not extended his lines north of Charleston neck, and the communication of the garrison with the country north-east of Cooper remained open. The American cavalry, under the command of General Huger, had passed that river, and was stationed in the neighbourhood of Monk's corner, about thirty miles above Charleston. As an additional security to this, the only remaining communication, two posts of militia were established, one between the Cooper and the Santee rivers, to which the Governor repaired in person; and another at a ferry on the Santee, where boats were to be collected for the purpose of facilitating the passage of the American army over that river, should it be deemed adviseable to evacuate the town.

Until now, Sir Henry Clinton had not extended his lines north of Charleston Neck, and the garrison's connection with the area northeast of Cooper remained open. The American cavalry, led by General Huger, had crossed that river and was stationed near Monk's Corner, about thirty miles north of Charleston. To further secure this remaining connection, two militia posts were set up: one between the Cooper and Santee rivers, which the Governor visited personally, and another at a ferry on the Santee, where boats were gathered to help the American army cross the river if it was decided that evacuating the town was necessary.

Such importance was attached to this object, that Lincoln, after Woodford had entered Charleston, detached a part of his regular troops, to throw up some works about nine miles above the town, on Wando, the eastern branch of Cooper, and on Lamprere's point. The militia, it was hoped, though unwilling to enter Charleston, might be drawn to these posts.[Pg 172]

Such importance was placed on this object that Lincoln, after Woodford had entered Charleston, sent part of his regular troops to set up some defenses about nine miles above the town, on Wando, the eastern branch of Cooper, and on Lamprere's point. It was hoped that the militia, although hesitant to enter Charleston, might be persuaded to go to these posts.[Pg 172]

April 14.

After the fleet had entered the harbour, Sir Henry Clinton turned his attention to the country on the east of Cooper, to acquire the possession of which it was necessary to disable the American cavalry. This service was committed to Lieutenant Colonel Webster, who detached Tarlton with the horse and a corps of infantry to execute it. He succeeded completely. Tarlton surprises and defeats an American corps at Monk's corner.Conducted in the night through unfrequented paths to the American videttes, he entered the camp with them, killed and took about one hundred men, and dispersed the residue, who saved themselves on foot in a swamp. Near fifty wagons loaded with military stores, and about four hundred horses, fell into the hands of the victors.

After the fleet entered the harbor, Sir Henry Clinton focused on the area east of Cooper, which needed to be secured by neutralizing the American cavalry. Lieutenant Colonel Webster was assigned this task and sent Tarlton with the cavalry and a group of infantry to carry it out. He was completely successful. Tarlton unexpectedly defeats an American corps at Monk's Corner. He traveled at night through little-used paths to reach the American pickets, entered their camp with them, killed and captured about one hundred men, and scattered the rest, who escaped on foot into a swamp. Nearly fifty wagons loaded with military supplies and around four hundred horses were captured by the victors.

This decisive blow gave Lieutenant Colonel Webster possession of the whole country between Cooper and Wando; and closed the only route by which the garrison could have retreated.

This decisive blow gave Lieutenant Colonel Webster control of the entire area between Cooper and Wando and blocked the only route the garrison could have used to retreat.

The besiegers had now commenced their second parallel, and it became every day more apparent that the town must ultimately yield to their regular approaches. An evacuation was proposed, and Lincoln is understood to have been in favour of that measure; but the remonstrances of the principal inhabitants, who entreated him not to abandon them to the fury of a disappointed enemy, added to the great difficulty which must attend such an attempt, especially when opposed by the civil government, deterred him from adopting the only course[Pg 173] which afforded even a probability, by saving his army, of saving the southern states.

The attackers had now started their second line of trenches, and it was becoming increasingly clear every day that the town would eventually surrender to their systematic advances. An evacuation was suggested, and Lincoln is believed to have supported that idea; however, the protests from the key residents, who begged him not to leave them at the mercy of an angry enemy, along with the significant challenges that would come with such an action—especially facing resistance from the local government—stopped him from taking the only path[Pg 173] that might save his army and, potentially, the southern states.

Soon after the affair at Monk's corner, Sir Henry Clinton received a reinforcement of three thousand men from New York. This addition to his strength enabled him to detach largely to the aid of Lieutenant Colonel Webster, after which Lord Cornwallis took command of the troops on that side of Cooper River.

Soon after the incident at Monk's Corner, Sir Henry Clinton got a reinforcement of three thousand men from New York. This boost to his forces allowed him to send significant support to Lieutenant Colonel Webster, after which Lord Cornwallis took charge of the troops on that side of the Cooper River.

April 20.

Upon this change of situation, Lincoln called another council of war. Notwithstanding the multiplied difficulties attending an evacuation of Charleston, he appears to have been still inclined to it. But a number of fortunate circumstances must have concurred to render a retreat possible; and the attempt was effectually prevented by the opposition of the civil government. The opinion seems to have prevailed, that the escape of the garrison would be followed by the destruction of the town, and the ruin of its inhabitants.

Upon this change in the situation, Lincoln called another war council. Despite the many challenges involved in evacuating Charleston, he seemed to still be leaning toward that option. However, several fortunate circumstances would have had to align to make a retreat possible, and the attempt was effectively blocked by the civil government's opposition. The prevailing belief appeared to be that if the garrison escaped, it would lead to the town's destruction and the ruin of its residents.

The council advised that a capitulation should be proposed, and that the town should be surrendered on condition that the garrison should be at liberty still to bear arms, and that the inhabitants should be secured in their persons and property. These propositions being rejected, hostilities recommenced.

The council suggested that a surrender should be offered, and that the town should be handed over on the condition that the soldiers could still carry weapons, and that the residents would be protected in their lives and property. When these proposals were turned down, fighting resumed.

The besiegers had completed their second parallel, and had begun the third, when Colonel Henderson made a vigorous sally on their right,[Pg 174] which was attended with some success. That this was the only sortie made during the siege, is to be ascribed to the weakness of the garrison. General Lincoln deemed it necessary to reserve all his strength to man his lines in the event of an assault, or to force a retreat, should he determine to evacuate the city.

The attackers had finished their second trench and started on the third when Colonel Henderson launched a strong attack on their right,[Pg 174] which had some success. The fact that this was the only attack made during the siege is due to the weakness of the defenders. General Lincoln felt it was important to keep all his forces ready to defend his positions in case of an assault or to make a retreat if he decided to evacuate the city.

In this state of things, General Du Portail, who had been directed to join the southern army, was conducted by secret ways into the town. He perceived the impossibility of defending the place, and repeated the proposition for attempting a retreat. This proposition was again rejected; and it only remained to defer the surrender as long as possible, in the vain hope that some fortunate occurrence might bring relief.

In this situation, General Du Portail, who had been ordered to join the southern army, was secretly led into the town. He realized that defending the place was impossible and suggested trying to retreat again. This suggestion was denied once more, and the only option left was to delay the surrender for as long as possible, hoping that something fortunate might happen to provide relief.

Every day diminished this hope, and added to the difficulties of the besieged. The garrison of fort Moultrie surrender themselves prisoners of war.The admiral took possession of Mount Pleasant, which induced the immediate evacuation of Lamprere's point; soon after which the garrison of fort Moultrie, amounting to about two hundred men,[22] surrendered themselves prisoners of war. On the same day, the cavalry which had escaped the disaster at Monk's corner, and had been reassembled under the command of Colonel White, of New Jersey, was again surprised and defeated by Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton at Lanneau's ferry.

Every day weakened this hope and increased the struggles of those under siege. The garrison at Fort Moultrie surrendered and became prisoners of war. The admiral took control of Mount Pleasant, which led to the quick evacuation of Lamprere's Point; shortly after, the garrison of Fort Moultrie, consisting of about two hundred men,[22] surrendered as prisoners of war. On the same day, the cavalry that had escaped the disaster at Monk's Corner and had regrouped under Colonel White from New Jersey was once again caught off guard and defeated by Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton at Lanneau's Ferry.

The investment of the town was now complete; the advances were rapid; and it became obvious that the place could be defended only a few days longer. The besiegers had finished their third parallel; and by a sap pushed to the dam that supplied the canal with water, had drained it in many places to the bottom. The garrison, fatigued and worn out with constant duty, was too weak to man the lines sufficiently; their guns were almost all dismounted; most of the embrasures demolished; their shot nearly expended; their provisions, with the exception of a few cows, entirely consumed; and the approaches of the besiegers so near, that their marksmen frequently picked off the men from the guns, and killed[23] any person who showed himself above the works.

The town's investment was now finished; things were moving quickly; and it became clear that the place could only be defended for a few more days. The attackers had completed their third trench; and by digging toward the dam that supplied the canal with water, they had drained it in many areas completely. The garrison, exhausted and worn down from constant duty, was too weak to adequately man the lines; most of their cannons were knocked out; many of the openings had been destroyed; their ammunition was nearly gone; their food, except for a few cows, had been completely used up; and the attackers were so close that their snipers frequently took out the men at the cannons and killed[23] anyone who showed themselves above the defenses.

In this state of things, the garrison was summoned, a second time, to surrender; on which a council was again called, which advised a capitulation. In pursuance of this advice, General Lincoln proposed terms which were refused, and hostilities recommenced.

In this situation, the garrison was called on a second time to surrender; a council was held again, which recommended a capitulation. Following this advice, General Lincoln proposed terms that were refused, and fighting resumed.

The besiegers now advanced their works in front of their third parallel, crossed the canal, pushed a double sap to the inside of the abattis, and approached within twenty yards of the American works. Preparations for an assault by sea and land were making. With less than three[Pg 176] thousand men, many of whom were militia, lines three miles in extent were to be defended against the flower of the British army, assisted by a powerful maritime force. Convinced that success was not possible, the citizens prepared a petition to General Lincoln, entreating him to surrender the town on the terms which had been offered by the besiegers.

The attackers moved their operations to the front of their third line, crossed the canal, set up a double trench towards the inside of the barriers, and got within twenty yards of the American defenses. They were preparing for an assault by both sea and land. With fewer than three[Pg 176] thousand soldiers, many of whom were militia, they had to defend a three-mile line against the best of the British army, backed by a strong naval force. Realizing that victory was unlikely, the citizens wrote a petition to General Lincoln, asking him to surrender the town under the terms offered by the attackers.

General Lincoln capitulates.

This proposition was made and accepted; and the capitulation was signed on the 12th of May.

This proposal was made and accepted, and the agreement was signed on May 12th.

May 12.

The town, and all public stores were surrendered. The garrison, as well the citizens who had borne arms as the continental troops, militia, and sailors, were to be prisoners of war. The garrison were to march out of town, and to deposite their arms in front of their works; but their drums were not to beat a British march, nor their colours to be reversed. The militia were to retire to their homes on parole, and their persons and property, as well as the persons and property of the inhabitants of the town, to be secure while they adhered to their paroles.

The town and all public stores were surrendered. The garrison, along with the citizens who had taken up arms, the continental troops, militia, and sailors, would become prisoners of war. The garrison was to march out of town and lay down their arms in front of their fortifications; however, their drums were not to play a British march, nor were their colors to be reversed. The militia were to return to their homes on parole, and their individuals and property, as well as the individuals and property of the town's inhabitants, were to be protected as long as they followed their paroles.

These terms being agreed on, the garrison laid down their arms, and General Leslie was appointed to take possession of the town.

These terms being agreed on, the garrison laid down their weapons, and General Leslie was assigned to take control of the town.

The defence of Charleston was obstinate, but not bloody. The besiegers conducted their approaches with great caution; and the besieged, too weak to hazard repeated sorties, kept within their lines. The loss on both sides was nearly equal. That of the British was seventy-six[Pg 177] killed and one hundred and eighty-nine wounded; and that of the Americans, excluding the inhabitants of the town not bearing arms, was ninety-two killed, and one hundred and forty-eight wounded.

The defense of Charleston was stubborn, but not violent. The attackers moved carefully, while the defenders, too weak to risk going out for repeated attacks, stayed within their lines. The loss on both sides was nearly equal. The British lost seventy-six[Pg 177] killed and one hundred eighty-nine wounded; the Americans, excluding the unarmed townspeople, lost ninety-two killed and one hundred forty-eight wounded.

From the official returns made to Sir Henry Clinton by his deputy adjutant general, the number of prisoners, exclusive of sailors, amounted to five thousand six hundred and eighteen men. This report, however, presents a very incorrect view of the real strength of the garrison. It includes every male adult inhabitant of the town. The precise number of privates in the continental regiments, according to the report made to congress by General Lincoln, was one thousand nine hundred and seventy-seven; of whom five hundred were in the hospital.

From the official reports submitted to Sir Henry Clinton by his deputy adjutant general, the number of prisoners, not counting sailors, totaled five thousand six hundred and eighteen men. However, this report gives a very inaccurate picture of the actual strength of the garrison. It includes every adult male resident of the town. The exact number of privates in the continental regiments, as stated in the report to Congress by General Lincoln, was one thousand nine hundred and seventy-seven, of whom five hundred were in the hospital.

The unfortunate are generally condemned; and the loss of the garrison of Charleston so maimed the force, and palsied the operations of the American government in the south, that censure was unsparingly bestowed on the officer who had undertaken and persevered in the defence of that place. In his justificatory letter to the Commander-in-chief, General Lincoln detailed at large the motives of his conduct, and stated the testimony on which those delusive hopes of substantial assistance were founded, which tempted him to remain in town, until the un[Pg 178]expected arrival of the reinforcement from New York deprived him of the power to leave it.

The unfortunate are usually blamed; the loss of the Charleston garrison severely weakened the forces and paralyzed the operations of the American government in the south, leading to harsh criticism of the officer who had taken on and continued to defend that location. In his defense letter to the Commander-in-Chief, General Lincoln explained in detail the reasons for his actions and outlined the evidence that had created those misleading expectations of substantial support, which led him to stay in the city until the un[Pg 178]expected arrival of reinforcements from New York made it impossible for him to leave.

The importance of that great mart of the southern states, which had become the depot for the country to a considerable extent around it; the magazines and military stores there collected, which, from the difficulty of obtaining wagons, could not be removed; the ships of war, which must be sacrificed should the town be evacuated; the intention of congress that the place should be defended; the assurances received that the garrison should be made up to ten thousand men, of whom nearly one half would be regular troops; the anxious solicitude of the government of South Carolina; all concurred to induce the adoption of a measure which, in its consequences, was extremely pernicious to the United States. In the opinion of those who were best enabled to judge of his conduct, General Lincoln appears to have been completely justified. The confidence of his government, and the esteem of the Commander-in-chief, sustained no diminution.

The significance of that major market in the southern states, which had largely become the hub for the surrounding country; the stockpiles of military supplies that were gathered there and could not be moved due to the difficulty in getting wagons; the warships that would have to be sacrificed if the town was evacuated; Congress's intention to defend the location; the assurances received that the garrison would be bolstered to ten thousand men, with nearly half being regular troops; and the urgent concern of the South Carolina government—all contributed to the decision to take a step that ultimately had extremely harmful consequences for the United States. Those best placed to evaluate his actions believe General Lincoln was completely justified. His government's confidence in him and the respect of the Commander-in-chief did not wane.

Sir Henry Clinton was aware of the impression his conquest had made, and of the value of the first moments succeeding it. Calculating on the advantages to be derived from showing an irresistible force in various parts of the country at the same time, he made three large detachments from his army;—the first and most considerable, towards the frontiers of North Carolina; the second to pass the Saluda to[Pg 179] Ninety-Six; and the third up the Savannah towards Augusta.

Sir Henry Clinton knew just how significant his victory was and how important the moments that followed were. Understanding the benefits of displaying an unstoppable force in different areas of the country simultaneously, he divided his army into three large groups: the first and most significant moved towards the North Carolina border; the second crossed the Saluda to[Pg 179] Ninety-Six; and the third headed up the Savannah towards Augusta.

Lord Cornwallis, who commanded the northern detachment, received intelligence, soon after passing the Santee, that Colonel Buford, with about four hundred men, was retreating in perfect security towards North Carolina. He detached Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton with his legion, the infantry being mounted, in pursuit of this party. Buford defeated.That officer, by making a movement of near one hundred miles in two days, overtook Buford, in a line of march, at the Waxhaws, and demanded a surrender on the terms which had been granted to the garrison of Charleston. This was refused. While the flags were passing, Tarlton continued to make his dispositions for the assault, and, the instant the truce was over, his cavalry made a furious charge on the Americans, who had received no orders to engage, and who seem to have been uncertain whether to defend themselves or not. In this state of dismay and confusion, some fired on the assailants, while others threw down their arms and begged for quarter. None was given. Colonel Buford escaped with a few cavalry; and about one hundred infantry, who were in advance, saved themselves by flight; but the regiment was almost demolished. Tarlton, in his official report, says that one hundred and thirteen were killed on the spot, one hundred and fifty so badly wounded as to be incapable of[Pg 180] being moved, and fifty-three were brought away as prisoners. The loss of the British was five killed and fourteen wounded.

Lord Cornwallis, who was in charge of the northern group, got word shortly after crossing the Santee that Colonel Buford, along with about four hundred men, was safely retreating toward North Carolina. He sent Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton and his legion, which was made up of mounted infantry, to chase after them. Buford lost. Tarlton covered nearly one hundred miles in two days and caught up with Buford as they marched at the Waxhaws. He demanded a surrender on the same terms offered to the garrison of Charleston, but that was refused. As the flags were exchanged, Tarlton prepared for the assault, and the moment the truce ended, his cavalry charged fiercely at the Americans, who had not received orders to fight and seemed unsure whether to defend themselves. In the midst of this panic and confusion, some fired at the attackers while others dropped their weapons and asked for mercy. None was given. Colonel Buford managed to escape with a few cavalry, and about one hundred infantry in front got away by running, but the regiment was almost completely destroyed. In his official report, Tarlton noted that one hundred thirteen were killed on the spot, one hundred fifty were so badly wounded that they couldn't be moved, and fifty-three were taken as prisoners. The British lost five killed and fourteen wounded.

Tarlton gives a very different account of the circumstances which preceded this massacre. He says that the demand for a surrender was made long before Buford was overtaken, and was answered by a defiance; that, on overtaking him, the British vanguard made prisoners of a sergeant and four light dragoons, in the presence of the two commanders, who immediately prepared for action; that as he advanced to the charge, when within fifty paces, the American infantry presented, and were commanded by their officers to retain their fire until the British cavalry should be nearer.[24]

Tarlton provides a very different version of the events leading up to this massacre. He claims that the demand for surrender was made well before Buford was caught, and it was met with defiance; that when they caught up to him, the British vanguard took a sergeant and four light dragoons prisoner in front of the two commanders, who immediately got ready for battle; that as he charged forward, when he was about fifty paces away, the American infantry raised their weapons and were ordered by their officers to hold their fire until the British cavalry got closer.[24]

The American officers who survived the carnage of the day, generally assert that flags passed after being overtaken, that they had received no orders from Colonel Buford when the charge was made, and that the fire of their troops was retained until the enemy was upon them, because they did not think themselves authorized to give it. The facts that Buford's field pieces were not discharged, and that the loss was so very unequal, are not to be reconciled with the idea of deliberate preparation for[Pg 181] battle, and justify the belief that the statement made by the American officers is correct.

The American officers who survived the chaos of the day generally claim that flags were passed after being taken, that they didn’t receive any orders from Colonel Buford when the charge happened, and that their troops held their fire until the enemy was close because they didn’t think they were authorized to shoot. The facts that Buford's artillery wasn’t fired and that the losses were so heavily uneven do not support the idea of careful preparation for[Pg 181] battle, which supports the belief that the accounts given by the American officers are accurate.

After the defeat of Buford, scarcely the semblance of opposition remained in South Carolina and Georgia. The military force employed by congress was nearly destroyed; the spirit of resistance seemed entirely broken; and a general disposition to submit to the victor displayed itself in almost every part of the country.

After Buford's defeat, there was hardly any sign of opposition left in South Carolina and Georgia. The military force used by Congress was almost wiped out; the will to resist seemed completely shattered; and a general willingness to submit to the victor showed up in almost every part of the country.

The two other detachments saw no appearance of an enemy. They received the submission of the inhabitants, who either became neutral by giving their paroles, not to bear arms against his Britannic Majesty, or took the oaths of allegiance, and resumed the character of British subjects.

The two other detachments didn’t see any sign of the enemy. They accepted the submission of the locals, who either became neutral by promising not to fight against his Britannic Majesty, or took oaths of allegiance and returned to being British subjects.

To keep up this disposition, garrisons were posted in different stations, and a series of measures was pursued for the purpose of settling the civil affairs of the province, and of giving stability to the conquest which had been made.

To maintain this stance, troops were stationed at various locations, and a series of actions were taken to address the civil matters of the province and to ensure the stability of the conquest that had been achieved.

Sir Henry Clinton takes measures for settling the government of South Carolina and Georgia.
June 3.

So entirely did the present aspect of affairs convince Sir Henry Clinton of the complete subjugation of the state, and of the favourable disposition of the people towards the British government, that he ventured to issue a proclamation, in which he discharged the militia who were prisoners from their paroles, with the exception of those who were taken in Charleston and fort Moultrie, and restored them to all the rights and duties of British subjects; declaring,[Pg 182] at the same time, that such of them as should neglect to return to their allegiance, should be considered and treated as enemies and rebels.

So completely did the current situation convince Sir Henry Clinton of the state's total subjugation and the people's favorable attitude toward the British government that he went ahead and issued a proclamation. In it, he released the militia who were prisoners from their commitments, except for those captured in Charleston and Fort Moultrie, and restored them to all the rights and responsibilities of British subjects; declaring,[Pg 182] at the same time, that anyone who failed to return to their allegiance would be regarded and treated as enemies and rebels.

This proclamation disclosed to the inhabitants their real situation. It proved that a state of neutrality was not within their reach; that the evils of war were unavoidable; that they must arrange themselves on the one side or the other; and that the only alternative presented to them was, to drive the enemy out of their country, or take up arms against their countrymen.

This announcement revealed to the people their true situation. It showed that a neutral stance was not possible; that the hardships of war were inevitable; that they had to side with one group or another; and that the only options available to them were to expel the enemy from their land or fight against their fellow citizens.

June 5.

With the most sanguine hopes that the southern states would be reunited to the British empire, Sir Henry Clinton embarked for New York, leaving about four thousand British troops in South Carolina, under the command of Lord Cornwallis.

With the most optimistic hopes that the southern states would rejoin the British Empire, Sir Henry Clinton set off for New York, leaving about four thousand British troops in South Carolina, commanded by Lord Cornwallis.

His lordship found it necessary to suspend the expedition he had meditated against North Carolina. The impossibility of supporting an army in that state before harvest, as well as the intense heat of the season, required this delay. His first care was to distribute his troops through South Carolina and the upper parts of Georgia, so as to promote the great and immediate objects of enlisting the young men who were willing to join his standard, of arranging the plan of a militia, and of collecting magazines at convenient places.

His lordship decided to put the expedition he had planned against North Carolina on hold. The difficulty of supporting an army in that state before the harvest, along with the extreme heat of the season, made this delay necessary. His first priority was to spread his troops across South Carolina and the northern regions of Georgia to focus on the urgent goals of recruiting young men who were eager to join his cause, organizing the militia, and gathering supplies in strategic locations.

In the mean time, he despatched emissaries to his friends in North Carolina, to inform them[Pg 183] of the necessary delay of his expedition into their country, and to request them to attend to their harvest, collect provisions, and remain quiet until late in August or early in September, when the King's troops would be ready to enter the province.

In the meantime, he sent messengers to his friends in North Carolina to let them know[Pg 183] about the necessary delay of his mission into their territory and to ask them to focus on their harvest, gather supplies, and stay calm until late August or early September, when the King's troops would be ready to enter the province.

The impatience of the royalists, stimulated by the triumph of their friends in a neighbouring state, and by the necessary severities of a vigilant government, could not be restrained by this salutary counsel. Anticipating the immediate superiority of their party, they could not brook the authority exercised over them, and broke out into premature and ill concerted insurrections, which were vigorously encountered, and generally suppressed. One body of them, however, amounting to about eight hundred men, led by Colonel Bryan, marched down the east side of the Yadkin to a British post at the Cheraws, whence they proceeded to Camden.

The impatience of the royalists, fueled by the success of their allies in a nearby state and by the tough measures of a cautious government, couldn’t be held back by this wise advice. Expecting their party to gain immediate power, they couldn’t accept the control over them and launched hasty and poorly organized uprisings, which were met with strong resistance and mostly put down. One group, however, consisting of around eight hundred men led by Colonel Bryan, marched along the east side of the Yadkin to a British post at the Cheraws, from where they moved on to Camden.

Having made his dispositions, and fixed on Camden as the place for his principal magazines, Cornwallis left the command of the frontiers to Lord Rawdon, and retired to Charleston for the purpose of making those farther arrangements of a civil nature, which the state of affairs and the interest of his sovereign might require.

Having set up his plans and decided on Camden as the location for his main supply stores, Cornwallis handed over control of the frontiers to Lord Rawdon and went back to Charleston to make further civil arrangements needed due to the current situation and the interests of his king.

His lordship, as well as Sir Henry Clinton, seems to have supposed the state of South Carolina to be as completely subdued in sentiment[Pg 184] as in appearance. Impatient to derive active aids from the new conquest, his measures were calculated to admit of no neutrality. For some time these measures seemed to succeed, and professions of loyalty were made in every quarter. But under this imposing exterior, lurked a mass of concealed discontent, to which every day furnished new aliment, and which waited only for a proper occasion to show itself.

His lordship, along with Sir Henry Clinton, seems to have thought that South Carolina was completely subdued both in spirit[Pg 184] and in appearance. Eager to gain active support from the new conquest, his strategies allowed for no neutrality. For a while, these strategies appeared to work, and pledges of loyalty came from all sides. But beneath this impressive facade, there was a lot of hidden discontent that grew each day, just waiting for the right moment to reveal itself.

The people of the lower parts of South Carolina, though far from being united, were generally attached to the revolution, and had entered into the war with zeal. They were conducted by a high spirited and intelligent gentry, who ardently sought independence as a real and permanent good.

The people in the lower parts of South Carolina, while not completely united, were mostly committed to the revolution and entered the war with enthusiasm. They were led by spirited and smart leaders who passionately pursued independence as a genuine and lasting benefit.

Several causes had combined to suspend the operation of this sentiment. Many of their leaders were prisoners; and the brilliant successes of the British arms had filled numbers with despair. Others were sensible of the inutility of present resistance; and a still greater number, fatigued and harassed with militia duty, were willing to withdraw from the conflict, and, as spectators, to await its issue. To compel these men to share the burdens of the war, was to restore them to their former friends.

Several factors came together to put this feeling on hold. Many of their leaders were in prison, and the impressive victories of the British forces left many feeling hopeless. Others realized that continuing to fight was pointless, and a larger group, tired and worn out from militia duties, wanted to step back from the fight and just watch how things unfolded. Forcing these men to take on the burdens of the war would have meant bringing them back to their previous allies.

Late in March, General Washington had obtained the consent of congress to reinforce the southern army with the troops of Maryland and Delaware, and with the first regiment of artil[Pg 185]lery. This detachment was to be commanded by the Baron De Kalb, a German veteran who had engaged early in the service of the United States.

Late in March, General Washington got Congress's approval to send more troops from Maryland and Delaware to support the southern army, along with the first regiment of artillery. This group was to be led by Baron De Kalb, a German veteran who had enlisted early in the service of the United States.

Such, however, was the deranged state of American finances, and such the depression of public credit, that these troops could not be put immediately in motion. They were at length embarked at the Head of Elk, and conveyed by water to Petersburg, in Virginia, whence they marched towards South Carolina. Their progress was delayed by that difficulty of obtaining subsistence which had induced Lord Cornwallis to suspend the invasion of North Carolina until harvest should be gathered. No preparations having been made for them, they were reduced to the necessity of spreading themselves over the country in small detachments, to collect corn, and grind it for their daily food. In this manner they proceeded through the upper parts of North Carolina to Deep River, and encamped near Buffalo Ford in July. At this place the Baron halted for a few days, in some uncertainty respecting his future course.[25]

However, the financial situation in America was so messed up, and public credit was so low, that these troops couldn't be moved right away. Eventually, they were loaded onto ships at the Head of Elk and taken by water to Petersburg, Virginia, from where they marched toward South Carolina. Their progress was slowed down by the struggle to find food, which had led Lord Cornwallis to delay the invasion of North Carolina until the harvest was complete. With no preparations made for them, they had to split up into small groups to gather corn and grind it for their daily meals. They moved through the northern regions of North Carolina to Deep River and set up camp near Buffalo Ford in July. Here, the Baron paused for a few days, uncertain about his next steps.[25]

The militia of North Carolina, commanded by General Caswell, were beyond the Pedee, on the road to Camden, and had nearly consumed the scanty supplies which could be gleaned from a country that was far from being productive. The Baron was premeditating on a plan for leaving the direct road and moving up the coun[Pg 186]try to the fertile banks of the Yadkin, when the approach of Major General Gates was announced by the arrival of his aid-de-camp, Major Armstrong.[26]

The North Carolina militia, led by General Caswell, were across the Pedee, on their way to Camden, and had almost used up the limited supplies that could be found in a land that was far from fertile. The Baron was thinking about a plan to leave the main road and head up to the rich banks of the Yadkin when Major General Gates' arrival was announced by his aide-de-camp, Major Armstrong.[Pg 186][26]

Aware of the danger to which the loss of Charleston had exposed that part of the confederacy, congress deemed it of the utmost importance to select a general for that department, in whom great military talents should be combined with that weight of character which might enable him to draw out the resources of the country. General Gates appointed to the command of the southern army.
July.
They turned their eyes on Gates;[27] and sanguine hopes were entertained that the conqueror of Burgoyne would prove the saviour of the southern states. On the 13th of June, he was called to the command in the southern department, and was directed to repair immediately to the army. He entered, without loss of time, on the duties of his station; and, on the 25th of July, reached the camp, where he was received by the Baron De Kalb with the utmost cordiality and respect.

Aware of the danger that the loss of Charleston posed to that part of the confederacy, Congress considered it critically important to choose a general for that area who combined exceptional military skills with a strong character that could help mobilize the country's resources. General Gates was appointed to lead the southern army.
July.
They focused on Gates; [27] and had high hopes that the victor over Burgoyne would save the southern states. On June 13th, he was appointed to lead the southern department and was instructed to join the army immediately. He promptly began his new responsibilities, and on July 25th, he arrived at the camp, where he was warmly and respectfully welcomed by the Baron De Kalb.

The approach of this army, and the information that great exertions were making in Virginia to augment it, revived the hopes of South Carolina, and brought again into action a spirit supposed to be extinguished. The British troops having occupied the north-western parts of the[Pg 187] state, the most active friends of the revolution in that quarter had fled from their homes, and sought an asylum in North Carolina and Virginia. As the discontents of their countrymen increased, and the prospect of being supported by regular troops brightened, a small body of these exiles, amounting to less than two hundred, assembled together, and choosing Colonel Sumpter, an old continental officer, for their chief, entered South Carolina. They skirmished with the royal militia and small corps of regulars on the frontiers, sometimes successfully, and always with the active courage of men fighting for the recovery of their property. The followers of Sumpter were soon augmented to six hundred men; and a disposition once more to take up arms showed itself in various parts of the state. Some corps of militia, which had been embodied under the authority of Lord Cornwallis, deserted his standard, and joined their countrymen. Perceiving this change of temper, the British general thought it necessary to draw in his out-posts, and to collect his troops into larger bodies.

The arrival of this army and the news of significant efforts being made in Virginia to strengthen it reignited the hopes of South Carolina and revived a spirit thought to be gone. The British troops had taken control of the northwestern areas of the[Pg 187] state, causing the most active supporters of the revolution in that region to flee their homes and seek safety in North Carolina and Virginia. As discontent among their fellow countrymen grew and the chances of support from regular troops improved, a small group of these exiles, numbering fewer than two hundred, came together and chose Colonel Sumpter, a veteran officer, as their leader to enter South Carolina. They engaged in skirmishes with the royal militia and small units of regulars on the frontiers, sometimes with success, always fighting with the determination of men trying to reclaim their property. Sumpter's followers quickly grew to six hundred men, and a renewed willingness to take up arms emerged in various parts of the state. Some militia groups that had formed under Lord Cornwallis’s command abandoned him and joined their fellow citizens. Noticing this shift in attitude, the British general deemed it essential to pull back his outposts and consolidate his troops into larger units.

On taking command of the southern army, General Gates directed the troops to hold themselves in readiness to march at a moment's warning; and, on the morning of the 27th, put the whole in motion. Disregarding the judicious remonstrances which were made to him against pursuing the direct road, he determined on tak[Pg 188]ing the nearest route to the advanced post of the British on Lynch's Creek, a few miles from Camden. The motives assigned by himself for passing through this barren country were, the necessity of uniting with Caswell, who had evaded the orders repeatedly given him to join the army, the danger of dispiriting the troops, and intimidating the people of the country, by pursuing a route not leading directly towards the enemy, and the assurances he had received that supplies would overtake him, and would be prepared for him on the road.

Upon taking charge of the southern army, General Gates ordered the troops to be ready to march at a moment's notice; and on the morning of the 27th, he set everything in motion. Ignoring the wise objections raised against taking the direct route, he decided to take the closest path to the British outpost at Lynch's Creek, which is just a few miles from Camden. The reasons he gave for going through this barren area were the need to unite with Caswell, who had repeatedly ignored orders to join the army, the risk of demoralizing the troops and scaring the local population by not approaching the enemy directly, and the assurances he had received that supplies would catch up with him and be ready for him along the way.

These assurances were not fulfilled; and, the country being still more barren than had been anticipated, the distress of the army was extreme. The soldiers subsisted on a few lean cattle found in the woods, and a very scanty supply of green corn and peaches. August 13.Encouraged by the example of their officers, who shared all their sufferings, and checked occasional murmurs, they struggled through these difficulties, and, after effecting a junction with General Caswell and with Lieutenant Colonel Porterfield,[28] the army reached Clermont, sometimes called Rugely's mills, on the 13th of August. Possession was taken of this place without any oppo[Pg 189]sition from Lord Rawdon, who, on the approach of the American army, drew in his out-posts, and assembled all his forces at Camden.[29]

These promises were not kept, and since the land was even more barren than expected, the army's suffering was intense. The soldiers survived on a few skinny cattle they found in the woods and a very limited supply of green corn and peaches. August 13th. Inspired by their officers, who endured all the same hardships and quieted occasional complaints, they pushed through these challenges, and after joining General Caswell and Lieutenant Colonel Porterfield,[28] the army arrived at Clermont, sometimes known as Rugely's mills, on August 13. They took control of the area without any resistance from Lord Rawdon, who, upon the arrival of the American army, pulled back his outposts and gathered all his troops at Camden.[29]

The day after the arrival of Gates at Clermont, he was joined by seven hundred militia from Virginia, commanded by Brigadier General Stevens, an officer of considerable merit, who, during the campaigns of 1777 and 1778, had commanded a continental regiment. On the same day, an express arrived from Colonel Sumpter, with information that an escort of clothing, ammunition, and other stores for the garrison at Camden, was on the way from Ninety-Six, and must pass the Wateree at a ferry about a mile from Camden, which was covered by a small redoubt on the opposite side of the river. One hundred regular infantry with two brass field-pieces, were immediately detached to join Colonel Sumpter, who was ordered to reduce the redoubt, and to intercept the convoy.[30]

The day after Gates arrived at Clermont, he was joined by seven hundred militia from Virginia, led by Brigadier General Stevens, an accomplished officer who had commanded a continental regiment during the campaigns of 1777 and 1778. On the same day, an urgent message came from Colonel Sumpter, informing that a shipment of clothing, ammunition, and other supplies for the garrison at Camden was on its way from Ninety-Six and would need to cross the Wateree at a ferry about a mile from Camden, which was secured by a small fort on the other side of the river. One hundred regular infantry with two brass field guns were immediately sent to assist Colonel Sumpter, who was ordered to take the fort and intercept the convoy.[30]

To attract the attention of the garrison in Camden, and thus co-operate with the expedition under Sumpter, it was determined in a council of general officers to put the army in motion that evening, and to take a post about seven miles from Camden with a deep creek in front.

To get the attention of the troops in Camden and support the mission led by Sumpter, the general officers decided in a meeting to move the army that evening and set up camp about seven miles from Camden with a deep creek in front.

The sick, the heavy baggage, and the military stores were ordered under a guard to Waxhaws,[31] and the army was directed to be in readiness to[Pg 190] march precisely at ten in the evening in the following order.

The sick, the heavy baggage, and the military supplies were put under guard to head to Waxhaws,[31] and the army was instructed to be ready to[Pg 190] march exactly at ten in the evening in the following order.

Colonel Armand's legion composed the van. Porterfield's light infantry, reinforced by a company of picked men from Stevens's brigade, covered the right flank of the legion; while Major Armstrong's light infantry of North Carolina militia, reinforced in like manner from Caswell's division, covered the left. The Maryland division, followed by the North Carolina and Virginia militia, with the artillery, composed the main body and rear guard; and the volunteer cavalry were equally distributed on the flanks of the baggage.

Colonel Armand's legion was at the front. Porterfield's light infantry, backed by a company of handpicked soldiers from Stevens's brigade, protected the right side of the legion. Meanwhile, Major Armstrong's light infantry from the North Carolina militia, also strengthened by reinforcements from Caswell's division, took care of the left side. The Maryland division, followed by the North Carolina and Virginia militia along with the artillery, made up the main body and rear guard; the volunteer cavalry was evenly spread across the flanks of the baggage.

In the event of an attack in front by the British cavalry, the infantry on the flanks were directed to march up, and to continue their fire on the assailants. It was supposed they would enable Colonel Armand to resist the shock; and his orders were positive to maintain his ground against the cavalry, whatever their numbers might be.[32]

In the event of a frontal attack by the British cavalry, the infantry on the flanks were instructed to move forward and keep firing at the attackers. It was thought they would help Colonel Armand withstand the assault; he was given strict orders to hold his position against the cavalry, no matter how many there were.[32]

At the time of communicating these orders to Colonel Otho H. Williams, the Deputy Adjutant General, Gates, showed him a rough estimate of the army, making it upwards of seven thousand. Convinced that this estimate was exaggerated, Colonel Williams availed himself of his means of information to make an abstract of the whole, which he presented to the general,[Pg 191] and which exhibited exactly three thousand and fifty-two in the column of present fit for duty, of whom more than two-thirds were militia. Gates expressed some surprise at the numbers, but said, "there are enough for our purpose," and directed the orders to be issued to the army. About ten at night, the line of march was taken up, and the army had advanced about half way to Camden, when a firing commenced in front.[33]

At the time he communicated these orders to Colonel Otho H. Williams, the Deputy Adjutant General, Gates showed him a rough estimate of the army, claiming it was over seven thousand. Believing this estimate was inflated, Colonel Williams used his resources to create a summary that he presented to the general,[Pg 191] showing exactly three thousand and fifty-two troops currently fit for duty, with more than two-thirds being militia. Gates was somewhat surprised by the numbers but said, "there are enough for our purpose," and instructed that the orders be sent out to the army. Around ten at night, the army began to march, having advanced about halfway to Camden when gunfire erupted in front.[33]

Intelligence of the approach of the American army, and of the defection of the country between Pedee and the Black River, had been communicated to Lord Cornwallis, and had induced him to hasten in person to Camden, which place he reached the day Gates arrived at Clermont.

Intelligence about the movements of the American army and the defection of the area between Pedee and the Black River had been relayed to Lord Cornwallis, prompting him to rush to Camden in person, arriving there on the same day Gates reached Clermont.

The British army did not much exceed two thousand men, of whom about nineteen hundred were regulars; but, as the whole country was rising, Lord Cornwallis apprehended that every day would strengthen his enemy, and therefore determined to attack him in his camp; hoping, by a prompt execution of this resolution, to surprise him. By one of those caprices of fortune on which great events often depend, he marched from Camden to attack Gates in Clermont, at the very hour that Gates moved from that place towards Camden.[34]

The British army was just under two thousand strong, with about nineteen hundred of them being regular troops. However, since the entire country was mobilizing, Lord Cornwallis feared that every day would bolster his enemy, so he decided to launch an attack on them in their camp. He hoped that by quickly following through with this plan, he could catch them off guard. In a twist of fate that often shapes significant events, he marched from Camden to confront Gates in Clermont at the exact moment that Gates was leaving for Camden.[34]

August 16.

About half past two in the morning, the advanced parties of the hostile armies, to their mutual surprise, met in the woods, and began to[Pg 192] skirmish with each other. Some of Armand's cavalry being wounded by the first fire, threw the others into disorder, and the whole recoiled so suddenly that the first Maryland regiment, composing the front of the column was broken, and the whole line thrown into consternation. From this first impression, the raw troops never recovered. The light infantry, however, particularly Porterfield's corps, behaved so well as to check the advance of the British. Unfortunately, their gallant commander received a mortal wound, which compelled him to leave his regiment. Yet a part of it kept its ground; and, with the aid of the legion infantry, stopped the British van; upon which order was restored to the American army.

Around 2:30 in the morning, the advance units of both opposing armies unexpectedly faced off in the woods and began to[Pg 192] skirmish. Some of Armand's cavalry were injured from the initial shots, causing chaos among the others, and the entire line recoiled so quickly that the first Maryland regiment, at the front of the column, was shattered, throwing the whole line into panic. From that moment on, the inexperienced troops never recovered. However, the light infantry, especially Porterfield's corps, performed admirably and managed to halt the British advance. Sadly, their brave leader was mortally wounded and had to leave his regiment. Nevertheless, part of it held its position, and with the help of the legion infantry, they stopped the British front, restoring order to the American army.

The officers were immediately employed in forming a line of battle in front. The Maryland division, including the troops of Delaware, were on the right, the North Carolina militia in the centre, and the Virginia militia on the left.

The officers quickly got to work setting up a battle line in front. The Maryland division, along with the Delaware troops, was on the right, the North Carolina militia was in the center, and the Virginia militia was on the left.

In this rencounter some prisoners were made, from one of whom Colonel Williams drew the information that the British army, consisting of near three thousand men, commanded by Lord Cornwallis in person, was in full march five or six hundred yards in front. This intelligence was immediately communicated to General Gates, who had supposed Lord Cornwallis to be still in Charleston. The general officers were[Pg 193] assembled in the rear of the line, and this information submitted to them. After a short silence, Stevens said, "Gentlemen, is it not too late to do any thing but fight?" No other advice being given, General Gates, who seems to have been himself disposed to risk a battle, directed the officers to repair to their respective commands.

In this encounter, some prisoners were taken, and from one of them, Colonel Williams learned that the British army, made up of nearly three thousand men and personally led by Lord Cornwallis, was marching just five or six hundred yards ahead. This information was quickly passed on to General Gates, who had thought Lord Cornwallis was still in Charleston. The general officers were[Pg 193] gathered at the back of the line, and this news was presented to them. After a brief silence, Stevens said, "Gentlemen, is it not too late to do anything other than fight?" Since no other suggestions were made, General Gates, who seemed ready to take the risk of battle himself, instructed the officers to return to their respective commands.

The ground on which the army was drawn up was so narrowed by a marsh on each flank, as to admit of removing the first Maryland brigade, so as to form a second line about two hundred yards in rear of the first. The artillery was placed in the centre of the first line, and Armstrong's light infantry was ordered to cover a small interval between the flank of the left wing and the marsh.

The ground where the army was positioned was squeezed by a marsh on both sides, allowing for the relocation of the first Maryland brigade to create a second line about two hundred yards behind the first. The artillery was set up in the center of the first line, and Armstrong's light infantry was instructed to fill a small gap between the left wing and the marsh.

Frequent skirmishes occurred during the night between the advanced parties, with scarcely any other effect than to discover the situation of the armies, evince the intention of the generals, and serve as a prelude to the events of the succeeding morning.

Frequent skirmishes took place during the night between the advance teams, with little effect other than revealing the positions of the armies, showing the intentions of the generals, and setting the stage for the events of the next morning.

At dawn of day the British appeared in front, advancing in column. Lieutenant Colonel Webster commanded on the right, and Lord Rawdon on the left. The seventy-first regiment composed the reserve. Four field pieces were attached to the left, and one to the corps de reserve.

At dawn, the British showed up in front, marching in a line. Lieutenant Colonel Webster was in charge on the right, and Lord Rawdon was on the left. The seventy-first regiment made up the reserve. Four field guns were assigned to the left, and one to the reserve corps.

Captain Singleton opened some field pieces on the front of the column, at the distance of about[Pg 194] two hundred yards, soon after which the American left was ordered to commence the action. It was then perceived that the British right was advancing in line; and as Stevens led on his brigade in good order, Colonel Williams advanced in front with a few volunteers, intending by a partial fire to extort that of the enemy at some distance, and thereby diminish its effect on the militia. The experiment did not succeed. The British rushed forward with great impetuosity, firing and huzzaing at the same time; and the terrified militia, disregarding the exertions of Stevens, who, in the firm tone of courage, endeavoured to inspire them with confidence in the bayonets they had just received, threw down their loaded muskets, fled from the field with the utmost precipitation, and were followed by the light infantry of Armstrong. The whole North Carolina division, except one regiment commanded by Colonel Dixon, an old continental officer, which was posted nearest the continental troops, followed the shameful example. Other parts of the same brigade, which was commanded by Gregory, paused for an instant; but the terror of their brethren was soon communicated to them, and they also threw away their arms, and sought for safety in flight. Their general, while endeavouring to rally them, was dangerously wounded.

Captain Singleton fired some cannons at the front of the column, about[Pg 194] two hundred yards away, and soon after, the American left was ordered to start the attack. It was then noticed that the British right was moving forward in formation; as Stevens led his brigade in good order, Colonel Williams went ahead with a few volunteers, hoping to draw fire from the enemy at a distance and lessen its impact on the militia. The effort failed. The British charged forward energetically, firing and cheering at the same time; the frightened militia, ignoring Stevens’ attempts to inspire confidence in the bayonets they had just received, dropped their loaded muskets and fled the field in a panic, being pursued by Armstrong's light infantry. The entire North Carolina division, except for one regiment led by Colonel Dixon, an experienced Continental officer stationed closest to the Continental troops, followed this disgraceful example. Other units in the brigade commanded by Gregory hesitated briefly, but the fear of their fellow soldiers quickly spread to them, and they too discarded their weapons and ran for safety. Their general was dangerously wounded while trying to regroup them.

Tarlton's legion charged them as they broke, and pursued them in their flight. Gates, in per[Pg 195]son, assisted by their generals, made several efforts to rally the militia; but the alarm in their rear still continuing, they poured on like a torrent, and bore him with them. He hastened with General Caswell to Clermont, in the hope of stopping a sufficient number of them at their old encampment, to cover the retreat of the continental troops; but this hope was entirely disappointed. Believing the continental troops also to be dispersed, he gave up all as lost, and retreated with a few friends to Charlotte, about eighty miles from the field of battle, where he left General Caswell to assemble the neighbouring militia, and proceeded himself to Hillsborough, in order to concert some plan of farther defence with the government.

Tarlton's army charged at them as they broke ranks and pursued them in their flight. Gates, in person and with the help of their generals, made several attempts to rally the militia; but with the ongoing alarm behind them, they rushed on like a flood and swept him along. He quickly went with General Caswell to Clermont, hoping to stop enough of them at their old camp to cover the retreat of the continental troops; but that hope was completely dashed. Thinking the continental troops were also scattered, he considered everything lost and retreated with a few friends to Charlotte, about eighty miles from the battlefield, where he left General Caswell to gather the nearby militia and went on to Hillsborough to plan further defense with the government.

Entirely deserted by the militia who composed the whole centre and left wing of the army, the continental troops, with the Baron De Kalb at their head, were left without orders, under circumstances which might have justified a retreat. But taking counsel from their courage, and seeing only the path of duty, they preferred the honourable and dangerous part of maintaining their position. They were charged by Lord Rawdon about the time the militia on their left were broken by Webster; but the charge was received with unexpected firmness. The bayonet was occasionally resorted to by both parties, and the conflict was maintained for near three quarters of an hour with equal obsti[Pg 196]nacy. During this time, the regiment on the left of the second Maryland brigade being covered by the reserve, so that it could be only engaged in front, gained ground and made prisoners.

Entirely abandoned by the militia that made up the entire center and left wing of the army, the Continental troops, led by Baron De Kalb, were left without orders, in a situation that would have justified a retreat. However, guided by their bravery and focused on their duty, they chose the honorable and risky route of holding their ground. They were charged by Lord Rawdon around the same time the militia on their left were overwhelmed by Webster, but they met the charge with surprising determination. Both sides occasionally resorted to using bayonets, and the fighting continued for nearly three-quarters of an hour with equal stubbornness. During this time, the regiment on the left of the second Maryland brigade, sheltered by the reserve to ensure it only faced the enemy in front, gained ground and captured prisoners.

The reserve, having its left entirely exposed, was flanked by the British right wing under Webster; who, after detaching a part of his cavalry and light infantry in pursuit of the flying militia, wheeled on that brigade, and attacking it in front and round the left flank, threw it into some disorder. The soldiers were, however, quickly rallied, and renewed the action with unimpaired spirit. Overpowered by numbers, they were again broken, and by the exertion of their officers were again formed, so as still to maintain the combat, and still to cover the flank of their brethren of the second brigade, who were in a manner blended with the enemy, and who kept up a desperate conflict in the hope of yet obtaining the victory.

The reserve was completely exposed on its left side and was surrounded by the British right wing led by Webster. After sending some of his cavalry and light infantry to chase down the fleeing militia, he turned on that brigade. Attacking from the front and around the left flank, he caused some disarray. However, the soldiers quickly regrouped and engaged in battle again with renewed determination. Outnumbered, they were again scattered but, thanks to their officers' efforts, they reformed to continue the fight and protect the flank of their comrades in the second brigade, who were effectively mingled with the enemy and fought fiercely in hopes of securing a victory.

The fire of the whole British army was now directed against these two devoted brigades. They had not lost an inch of ground when Lord Cornwallis, perceiving that they were without cavalry, pushed his dragoons upon them, and at the same instant, charged them with the bayonet. These gallant troops were no longer able to keep the field. They were at length broken; and, as they did not give way until intermingled with the enemy, they dispersed and fled in confusion. Before they were reduced to[Pg 197] this last extremity, the Baron De Kalb, who fought on foot with the second Maryland brigade, fell under eleven wounds. His aid-de-camp, Lieutenant Colonel Du Buysson, received him in his arms, announced his rank and nation to the surrounding foe, and begged that they would spare his life. While thus generously exposing himself to save his friend, he received several wounds, and, with his general, was taken prisoner. Death of De Kalb.The Baron expired in a few hours, and spent his last breath in dictating a letter, expressing the warmest affection for the officers and men of his division, and the most exalted admiration of their courage and good conduct.[35]

The entire British army was now focused on these two dedicated brigades. They hadn’t lost any ground when Lord Cornwallis, noticing they had no cavalry, sent his dragoons against them and simultaneously charged them with bayonets. These brave soldiers could no longer hold their position. Eventually, they were broken; since they didn’t retreat until mixed in with the enemy, they scattered and fled in chaos. Before they reached this final crisis, Baron De Kalb, who fought on foot with the second Maryland brigade, fell with eleven wounds. His aide-de-camp, Lieutenant Colonel Du Buysson, caught him in his arms, announced his rank and nation to the surrounding enemy, and pleaded for them to spare his life. By generously putting himself at risk to save his friend, he sustained multiple wounds and, along with his general, was taken prisoner. Death of DeKalb. The Baron died within a few hours, using his last moments to dictate a letter expressing deep affection for the officers and men of his division and the highest admiration for their courage and performance.[35]

Never was a victory more complete. Every corps was broken and dispersed in the woods. The general officers were divided from their men; and, except Rutherford of the North Carolina militia who was made a prisoner, reached Charlotte at different times. Colonel Williams, who witnessed the whole battle, and bore a conspicuous part in it, concludes his very animated description of it, with the observation, that "if in this affair the militia fled too soon, the regulars may be thought almost as blameable for remaining too long on the field; especially after all hope of victory must have been despaired of." He censures freely the conduct of the brigadiers, who gave, he says, no orders whatever to their brigades.[Pg 198]

Never has a victory been more complete. Every unit was shattered and scattered in the woods. The commanding officers were separated from their troops, and aside from Rutherford of the North Carolina militia, who was captured, they reached Charlotte at different times. Colonel Williams, who witnessed the entire battle and played a significant role in it, concludes his vivid description by noting that "if the militia fled too soon in this engagement, the regulars might be considered just as blameworthy for staying on the field too long; especially after all hope of victory must have been lost." He openly criticizes the brigadiers, stating that they gave no orders whatsoever to their brigades.[Pg 198]

About two hundred wagons, with a great part of the baggage, military stores, small arms, and all the artillery, fell into the hands of the conqueror. The loss of men could never be accurately ascertained, as no returns were received from the militia. Of the North Carolina division, between three and four hundred were made prisoners, and between sixty and one hundred were wounded. Of the Virginia militia, three were wounded on the field; and, as they were the first to fly, not many were taken.

About two hundred wagons, carrying a large portion of the baggage, military supplies, small arms, and all the artillery, were captured by the victor. The number of casualties could never be precisely determined, as no reports came in from the militia. From the North Carolina division, around three to four hundred were taken prisoner, and between sixty and one hundred were injured. From the Virginia militia, three were injured on the battlefield; and since they were the first to retreat, not many were captured.

For the numbers engaged, the loss sustained by the regulars was considerable. It amounted to between three and four hundred men, of whom a large portion were officers. The British accounts state the loss of the American army at eight or nine hundred killed, and about one thousand prisoners; while their own is said to be only three hundred and twenty-five, of whom two hundred and forty-five were wounded. Although many of the militia were killed during the flight, this account is probably exaggerated. It would seem too, that while the continental troops kept the field, the loss on both sides, in that part of the action, must have been nearly equal.

For the number of people involved, the loss suffered by the regular troops was significant. It was between three and four hundred men, with a large number being officers. British reports claim that the American army lost eight or nine hundred killed and about one thousand taken prisoner, while they report their own losses as only three hundred and twenty-five, with two hundred and forty-five wounded. Although many of the militia were killed during the retreat, this report is likely inflated. It also seems that while the continental troops remained in the field, the losses on both sides in that part of the battle must have been nearly equal.

On his retreat, the day of the battle, General Gates received information of the complete success of Sumpter. That officer had, on the evening that Lord Cornwallis marched from Camden, reduced the redoubt on the Wateree,[Pg 199] captured the guard, and intercepted the escort with the stores.

On the day of the battle during his retreat, General Gates learned that Sumpter had achieved complete success. That officer had, on the evening Lord Cornwallis moved out from Camden, taken down the redoubt on the Wateree,[Pg 199] captured the guard, and stopped the escort carrying the supplies.

This gleam of light cheered the dark gloom which enveloped his affairs but for a moment. He was soon informed that this corps also was defeated, and entirely dispersed.

This glimmer of light briefly brightened the dark cloud hanging over his situation. Soon enough, he was told that this group had also been defeated and completely scattered.

On hearing of the disaster which had befallen Gates, Sumpter began to retreat up the south side of the Wateree. Believing himself out of danger, he had halted on the twenty-eighth, during the heat of the day, near the Catawba Ford, to give his harassed troops some repose. August 18.At that place he was overtaken by Tarlton, who had been detached in pursuit of him on the morning of the 17th, and who, advancing with his accustomed celerity, entered the American camp so suddenly, as in a great measure to cut off the men from their arms. Some slight resistance made from behind the wagons was soon overcome, and the Americans fled precipitately to the river and woods. Between three and four hundred of them were killed and wounded; their baggage, artillery, arms, and ammunition were lost; and the prisoners and stores they had taken, were recovered. This advantage was gained with the loss of only nine men killed and six wounded.

Upon hearing about the disaster that had struck Gates, Sumpter began to pull back up the south side of the Wateree. Thinking he was out of danger, he stopped on the twenty-eighth, during the heat of the day, near the Catawba Ford, to give his exhausted troops a break. August 18th. There, he was caught by Tarleton, who had been sent after him on the morning of the 17th and who, moving swiftly as usual, entered the American camp so unexpectedly that many men were unable to grab their weapons. Some minor resistance from behind the wagons was quickly dealt with, and the Americans fled in a panic to the river and into the woods. Between three and four hundred of them were killed or wounded; they lost their baggage, artillery, weapons, and ammunition, as well as the prisoners and supplies they had captured. This victory was achieved with only nine men killed and six wounded.

Two videttes had been placed by Sumpter, on the road along which Tarlton had advanced, who fired upon his van and killed one of his dragoons, upon which they were both sabred.[Pg 200] We are informed by Colonel Tarlton that the inquiries made by Sumpter respecting the two shots, were answered by an assurance from an officer, just returned from the advanced sentries, that the militia were firing at cattle.

Two sentries had been set up by Sumpter on the road that Tarlton was coming down. They shot at his convoy and killed one of his soldiers, after which they were both killed with sabers.[Pg 200] Colonel Tarlton tells us that when Sumpter asked about the two shots, an officer who had just returned from the frontline assured him that the militia were shooting at cattle.

August 19.

Intelligence of this disaster reached Charlotte next day. Generals Smallwood and Gist were then arrived at that place, and about one hundred and fifty straggling, dispirited, half famished officers and soldiers had also dropped in. It was thought adviseable to retreat immediately to Salisbury. From that place, General Gates directed the remnant of the troops to march to Hillsborough, where he was endeavouring to assemble another army, which might enable him yet to contend for the southern states.

The news of this disaster reached Charlotte the next day. Generals Smallwood and Gist had just arrived there, along with about one hundred and fifty weary, downhearted, and half-starved officers and soldiers. It was deemed wise to retreat immediately to Salisbury. From that location, General Gates instructed the remaining troops to head to Hillsborough, where he was trying to gather another army that could still help him fight for the southern states.


CHAPTER VII.

Distress in the American camp.... Expedition against Staten Island.... Requisitions on the states.... New scheme of finance.... Committee of congress deputed to camp.... Resolution to make up depreciation of pay.... Mutiny in the line of Connecticut.... General Knyphausen enters Jersey.... Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York.... Skirmish at Springfield.... Exertions to strengthen the army.... Bank established in Philadelphia.... Contributions of the ladies.... Farther proceedings of the states.... Arrival of a French armament in Rhode Island.... Changes in the quartermaster's department.... Enterprise against New York abandoned.... Naval superiority of the British.

Struggles in the American camp.... Mission against Staten Island.... Requests from the states.... New financial plan.... A committee from Congress sent to the camp.... Decision to compensate for pay loss.... Revolt in the Connecticut troops.... General Knyphausen moves into Jersey.... Sir Henry Clinton goes back to New York.... Clash at Springfield.... Efforts to strengthen the army.... A bank is established in Philadelphia.... Donations from the ladies.... Further actions from the states.... A French military force arrives in Rhode Island.... Changes in the supply department.... Plan to attack New York called off.... British naval dominance.

 

1780.

While disasters thus crowded on each other in the southern states, the Commander-in-chief found himself surrounded with difficulties, which required his utmost exertions to avoid calamities equally distressing. His urgent requisitions for men to supply the places of those who were leaving the service, were not complied with, and the soldiers who remained, could scarcely be preserved from either perishing with cold and hunger, or dispersing and living on plunder.

While disasters piled up in the southern states, the Commander-in-chief faced numerous challenges that demanded his greatest efforts to prevent equally distressing outcomes. His urgent requests for more troops to replace those leaving the service went unmet, and the soldiers who stayed were barely able to avoid freezing, starving, or scattering to survive by looting.

General Greene and Colonel Wadsworth, who had, for the preceding year, been at the head of the quartermaster and commissary departments, possessed distinguished merit, and had employed assistants of unquestionable ability and integrity. Yet, for a great part of the campaign,[Pg 202] the rations were frequently reduced, and the army was rarely supplied with provisions for more than a few days in advance. Soon after coming into winter quarters, the magazines were exhausted, and afforded neither meat nor flour to be delivered to the men.

General Greene and Colonel Wadsworth, who had been in charge of the quartermaster and commissary departments for the past year, were highly respected and had enlisted assistants of unquestionable skill and honesty. However, for much of the campaign,[Pg 202] the rations were often cut back, and the army was seldom supplied with food for more than a few days ahead. Shortly after settling into winter quarters, the supply depots were depleted and provided neither meat nor flour for the soldiers.

This state of things had been long foreseen; and all the means in the power of the Commander-in-chief had been used to prevent it. Repeated representations of the actual famine with which the army was threatened, had been made to congress, and to the state governments; but no adequate relief was afforded; and such was the condition of the finances, so embarrassing the state of affairs, that it was perhaps attainable only by measures which the governments could not venture to adopt.

This situation had been predicted for a long time, and the Commander-in-chief had done everything possible to prevent it. There were numerous reports about the real threat of famine facing the army sent to Congress and the state governments, but no sufficient help was provided. The financial conditions were so troubling that it seemed the only way to resolve the situation was through actions that the governments were too reluctant to implement.

The rapid depreciation of the continental currency, had long been viewed with apprehensive anxiety by the enlightened friends of the revolution, and various unsuccessful expedients had been essayed for the purpose of checking its progress. All perceived that the great quantity in circulation was the principal cause of the diminution of its value; and congress had resolved not to exceed two hundred millions of dollars in their emissions. In the mean time, the utmost endeavours were used to defer an evil so justly dreaded, and among the expedients employed, was that of withholding from the[Pg 203] public agents, the money which was necessary for public purposes. This unwise experiment, while it defeated its own object, threatened the dissolution of the American army.

The rapid decline in the value of the continental currency had long been a source of worry for the informed supporters of the revolution, and various failed attempts had been made to slow its decline. Everyone understood that the large amount in circulation was the main reason for its decreased value; congress had decided not to exceed two hundred million dollars in their emissions. In the meantime, every effort was made to postpone such a feared disaster, and one of the strategies used was to withhold from the [Pg 203] public agents the money needed for public purposes. This foolish move, while undermining its own goal, jeopardized the survival of the American army.

The difference between the value of the article at the times of contract and of payment was soon perceived, and, of course, influenced its price. But this was the least mischievous consequence of this mistaken policy. The public agents contracted enormous debts which they were unable to discharge. Repeated disappointments destroyed their credit; and, towards the close of the year 1779, they found it impracticable to obtain supplies for the subsistence of the army.

The difference in the value of the article between the time of the contract and the time of payment was quickly noticed and, of course, affected its price. However, this was the least harmful result of this poor policy. The public officials took on huge debts that they couldn’t pay off. Ongoing disappointments ruined their credit, and by the end of 1779, they found it impossible to secure supplies for the army's needs.

From these causes, the contracts entered into could not be co-extensive with the public wants; and many of those which were made were not complied with.

From these reasons, the contracts that were made could not fully meet public needs; and many of those that were created were not followed through.

In this critical state of things, an entire revolution was made in the commissary department. Such was the prejudice against the system adopted by Great Britain, for supplying by contract, that it had been usual to allow, as a compensation to the commissary, a stipulated commission on all the monies expended on public account. After some time, this allowance was supposed to be an inducement to purchase at high prices; and an arrangement was made on the first of January, by which the commissary general was to receive a fixed nominal salary in[Pg 204] the paper currency, and was permitted to appoint assistants whose compensations were also fixed, and who were to defray, out of those compensations, all the expenses attending the transactions of the business. The practice of allowing them rations and forage was discontinued.

In this critical situation, there was a complete overhaul in the commissary department. There was a strong bias against the system used by Great Britain for supplying supplies through contracts, leading to the common practice of giving the commissary a set commission on all money spent on public accounts. After a while, this allowance was seen as a reason to make purchases at inflated prices; so, starting January 1st, the commissary general was given a fixed salary in[Pg 204] paper currency and allowed to hire assistants with set salaries. These assistants were responsible for covering all business-related expenses from their pay. The practice of providing them with rations and forage was stopped.

This new system was unfortunately so modified as to increase the embarrassments of the department. It was found difficult to obtain assistants and agents for the compensation allowed; and those who were willing to be employed, were unequal to the duties assigned them.

This new system was unfortunately changed in a way that increased the department's difficulties. It became hard to find assistants and agents willing to work for the compensation offered, and those who did agree to take the jobs were not capable of handling the responsibilities given to them.

For several days, the soldiers were reduced to half allowance, and sometimes to less. At length, affairs came to the crisis which had long been threatened; and, early in January, a letter was received from Colonel Wadsworth, informing the general that it was absolutely out of his power to supply the army longer with meat, as he was without money, and had totally exhausted his credit. About the same time, the assistant commissary, residing in camp, gave notice that his stock of provisions was on the point of being expended, and that he had no immediate prospect of a farther supply.

For several days, the soldiers were put on half rations and sometimes even less. Finally, things reached a breaking point that had been a long time coming; and, early in January, a letter arrived from Colonel Wadsworth, informing the general that he could no longer supply the army with meat because he was out of money and had completely used up his credit. Around the same time, the assistant commissary, who was stationed in camp, announced that his supplies were about to run out and that he had no immediate hope for more provisions.

This state of things compelled the Commander-in-chief to adopt efficacious measures, to relieve the immediate and pressing wants of his soldiers. He required from each county in the[Pg 205] state of Jersey, a quantity of meat and flour proportioned to its resources, to be raised and forwarded to the army within a limited time, not exceeding six days. In a circular letter addressed to the magistrates, he stated the pressing wants of the army, and the necessity of resorting to coercion should his requisition fail.

This situation forced the Commander-in-Chief to take effective steps to address the immediate and urgent needs of his soldiers. He demanded from each county in the[Pg 205] state of Jersey a specific amount of meat and flour based on their resources, to be collected and sent to the army within a maximum of six days. In a letter to the magistrates, he explained the critical needs of the army and the necessity of using force if his request was not met.

To the honour of the magistrates and people of New Jersey, although their country was much exhausted, the supplies required were instantly furnished, and a temporary relief obtained.

To the honor of the magistrates and people of New Jersey, even though their country was pretty drained, the necessary supplies were quickly provided, and temporary relief was secured.

The patient and uncomplaining fortitude with which the soldiers bore their sufferings, was strong evidence of their patriotism, and could not fail to make a deep impression on their general. But while their virtues excited his sensibilities, he expressed his fears very freely to congress, that they might be too severely tried.

The patient and uncomplaining strength with which the soldiers endured their suffering was clear evidence of their patriotism and was bound to leave a lasting impression on their general. However, while their virtues moved him, he openly shared his concerns with Congress that they might be tested too harshly.

The unusual severity of the winter, seemed to furnish an opportunity for active enterprise, which the Commander-in-chief observed, without being able to improve. The garrison of New York and its immediate dependencies, was supposed to be reduced to ten or eleven thousand effectives; and the security heretofore derived from its insular situation no longer existed. The ice was so strong that the whole army, with its train of wagons and artillery, might pass over without danger. This circumstance afforded a glorious occasion for striking a blow, which, if[Pg 206] successful, would most probably terminate the war. The effort would seem not to have exceeded the strength of America, could that strength have been exerted in proper season; but the government possessed neither sufficient energy nor concentration of power to call it forth; and this opportunity passed away, as many which present themselves in the course of human affairs, must pass away, if those who should take advantage of them, only begin to deliberate about making preparations in the season for action.

The unusual severity of the winter seemed to create an opportunity for active efforts, which the Commander-in-chief noticed but couldn't take advantage of. The garrison of New York and its nearby areas was thought to have been reduced to about ten or eleven thousand effective troops, and the safety previously offered by its island position no longer applied. The ice was so thick that the entire army, along with its wagons and artillery, could cross without risk. This situation provided a great chance to make a significant move that, if successful, would likely end the war. The effort seemed within America's capacity, if only that strength could have been used at the right time; however, the government lacked the energy and focus to mobilize it, and this opportunity slipped away, like many that arise in human affairs, when those who should seize them only start planning instead of taking action.

The force under the immediate command of General Washington, was decidedly inferior to that in New York; and so far was he from having reason to expect immediate reinforcements, that congress had not agreed on making a requisition for them. In addition to this feebleness in point of numbers, the soldiers were not half clothed; provisions for immediate use could be obtained only by contributions from the people; the quartermaster's department was unable to put an army in motion; and the military chest did not contain a dollar.

The force directly under General Washington’s command was clearly smaller than the one in New York, and he had no reason to expect reinforcements anytime soon since Congress hadn’t even decided to request them. On top of this lack of numbers, the soldiers were poorly clothed; they could only get immediate food supplies through donations from the local people; the quartermaster’s office couldn’t mobilize an army; and there wasn’t a single dollar in the military funds.

Under the pressure of this combination of discouraging circumstances, the active mind of Washington still looked forward to the possibility of deriving some advantage from the exposed situation of his adversary.

Under the pressure of this combination of discouraging circumstances, Washington's active mind still looked forward to the possibility of gaining some advantage from his adversary's exposed situation.

The troops on Staten Island were computed at one thousand or twelve hundred men; and the[Pg 207] firm bridge of ice now uniting that island to the Jersey shore, seemed to furnish an opportunity for bearing off this corps. General Washington determined to make the attempt with two thousand five hundred men, to be commanded by Major General Lord Stirling. The more distant troops moved down on sleds; and, to favour a surprise, the opinion was inculcated that they only constituted a relief for the detachment already on the lines.

The troops on Staten Island were estimated to be around one thousand to twelve hundred men, and the[Pg 207] solid ice bridge now connecting that island to the Jersey shore seemed to offer a chance to move this group. General Washington decided to go for it with two thousand five hundred men, led by Major General Lord Stirling. The more distant troops were transported down on sleds, and to help achieve surprise, it was suggested that they were just there to reinforce the detachment already on the lines.

January.

On the night of the 14th of January, Lord Stirling moved over from De Hart's point; and, detaching Lieutenant Colonel Willet to Decker's house, where Buskirk's regiment was stationed, proceeded himself to the watering place, where the main body was posted. Notwithstanding the precautions which had been taken, the alarm had been given at each post, and the troops had saved themselves in their works; so that only a few prisoners were made. Contrary to the intelligence previously received, the communication with New York was still open; and the works appeared too strong to justify the hazard of attempting to carry them by assault.

On the night of January 14th, Lord Stirling moved from De Hart's point. He sent Lieutenant Colonel Willet to Decker's house, where Buskirk's regiment was stationed, and proceeded to the watering place, where the main group was set up. Despite the precautions that had been taken, an alarm was raised at each post, and the troops took shelter in their defenses, resulting in only a few prisoners being captured. Contrary to the information that had been received earlier, communication with New York was still open, and the defenses looked too strong to risk an assault.

January 17.

The object of the expedition being unattainable, Lord Stirling commenced his retreat, which was effected with inconsiderable loss. A body of cavalry, which charged his rear, was repulsed; but, from the intenseness of the cold, and the defectiveness of his means to protect his[Pg 208] men from it, some of them were frost bitten, and a few stragglers were made prisoners.

The goal of the expedition was unreachable, so Lord Stirling began his retreat, which he managed with minimal loss. A group of cavalry that attacked his rear was driven back; however, due to the extreme cold and his inadequate resources to keep his[Pg 208] men warm, some suffered from frostbite, and a few stragglers were captured.

The excessive cold continuing, the rivers were soon afterwards completely blocked up. Even arms of the sea were passable on the ice; and the islands about the mouth of the Hudson, presented the appearance of one whole and unbroken continent. This state of things produced a great degree of suffering among all classes in New York. The supplies usually received by water failed totally, and a great scarcity of provisions and of fuel was the consequence. To increase this scarcity, the American troops on the lines were so disposed as to interrupt the communication between the country and the town; and these arrangements produced a partisan war, in which the advantage was rather on the side of the British.

The harsh cold continued, and soon the rivers were completely frozen over. Even sea channels were accessible on the ice, and the islands near the mouth of the Hudson looked like a single, unbroken landmass. This situation caused significant suffering for everyone in New York. The usual supplies that came by water completely stopped, leading to a serious shortage of food and fuel. To make matters worse, the American troops positioned themselves to disrupt communication between the countryside and the city, creating a partisan war where the British seemed to have the upper hand.

In one of the most important of these skirmishes, Captain Roberts, of Massachusetts, with fourteen of his men, were killed on the spot; seventeen were wounded, of whom three died in a few days; and Lieutenant Colonel Thompson, of Massachusetts, who commanded the party, two captains, four subalterns, and ninety non-commissioned officers and privates were made prisoners.

In one of the most significant skirmishes, Captain Roberts from Massachusetts, along with fourteen of his men, were killed instantly; seventeen were injured, three of whom died within a few days; and Lieutenant Colonel Thompson from Massachusetts, who led the group, along with two captains, four junior officers, and ninety enlisted men, were taken prisoner.

The emission of the full sum of two hundred millions of dollars in continental bills of credit, which congress had solemnly resolved not to exceed, had been completed in November, 1779,[Pg 209] and the money was expended. The requisitions on the states to replenish the treasury by taxes were not fully complied with; and, had they even been strictly observed, would not have produced a sum equal to the public expenditure. It was therefore necessary to devise other measures for the prosecution of the war. During the distresses which brought the army to the brink of dissolution, these measures were under consideration. So early as December, 1779, congress had determined to change the mode of supplying the army from purchases to requisitions of specific articles on the several states. As preliminary to this system, commissioners were appointed to make the estimates, and to introduce every practicable reform in the expenditures. This subject was under deliberation until the 25th of February, when sundry resolutions were passed, apportioning on the states their respective quotas of provisions, spirits, and forage, for the ensuing campaign. The value of the several articles was estimated in specie; and assurances were given that accounts between the states should be regularly kept, and finally settled in Spanish milled dollars.

The release of the total amount of two hundred million dollars in continental bills of credit, which Congress had officially decided not to exceed, was completed in November 1779,[Pg 209] and the money was spent. The requests to the states to help replenish the treasury through taxes were not fully met; and even if they had been strictly followed, they wouldn't have generated enough to cover public spending. Therefore, it was necessary to come up with other plans to continue the war. During the hardships that nearly caused the army to fall apart, these plans were being discussed. As early as December 1779, Congress decided to shift from purchasing supplies for the army to requesting specific items from the states. To start this system, commissioners were appointed to make the estimates and to introduce any feasible reforms in spending. This topic was under consideration until February 25, when various resolutions were passed, assigning each state their respective shares of provisions, alcohol, and forage for the upcoming campaign. The value of these items was assessed in cash, and assurances were provided that accounting between the states would be properly maintained and ultimately settled in Spanish milled dollars.

For the purpose of inducing and facilitating a compliance with these requisitions, congress also resolved, "that any state which shall have taken the necessary measures for furnishing its quota, and have given notice thereof to congress, shall be authorized to prohibit any continental quar[Pg 210]termaster or commissary from purchasing within its limits."

For the purpose of encouraging and ensuring compliance with these requirements, Congress also decided that any state that has taken the necessary steps to provide its share and has notified Congress about it shall be allowed to prohibit any continental quartermaster or commissary from making purchases within its territory.

These resolutions, constituting the basis of a new system on which the future subsistence of the army was essentially to depend, were too deeply interesting not to receive the anxious attention of the Commander-in-chief. With regret, he communicated to congress the radical defects he perceived in their arrangements, with his apprehensions that this untried scheme would fail in practice.

These resolutions, forming the foundation of a new system that the army's future survival would largely depend on, were too important not to catch the Commander-in-chief's worried attention. With regret, he informed Congress about the significant flaws he noticed in their plans, expressing his concerns that this untested scheme would fail in reality.

His judgment, and the judgment of all men engaged in high and responsible situations, was decidedly in favour of conducting the war on a national rather than on a state system. But, independent of this radical objection, economy had been so much more consulted than the probable necessities of the army, that, in almost every article, the estimate had fallen far short of the demand to be reasonably expected.

His judgment, along with that of everyone in high and responsible positions, clearly favored carrying out the war on a national level instead of a state system. However, aside from this fundamental issue, cost-saving measures had been prioritized over the actual needs of the army, resulting in estimates that fell significantly short of what would reasonably be expected.

The total omission to provide means for supplying occasional deficiencies from the surplus resources of any particular state, was an error of still greater magnitude. It was obvious that the demand in any state which should become the theatre of war, would be much greater than its quota; and experience had shown that the carriage of specific articles from distant places was always difficult and expensive, and sometimes impracticable. Yet no means were adopted to supply such extraordinary demand,[Pg 211] whatever might be the resources of the country. A still more radical objection to the system was the principle, enabling any state which should take means to comply with the requisition, and should notify those means to the government of the United States, to prohibit the continental agents from making any purchases within its territory. Among the states which adopted the proposition of congress was New Jersey, in which the largest division of the army was stationed. Its legislature passed an act prohibiting the purchase of provisions within its jurisdiction by the staff of the continental line, under severe penalties; and refused to authorize its own agents to provide for any emergency however pressing. It was an additional objection to these requisitions, that they specified no periods of the year within which certain portions of the articles demanded should be raised, and consequently might be complied with, although the army should be left destitute of every necessary for a considerable part of the campaign.

The complete failure to provide ways to address occasional shortages using the surplus resources of any specific state was an even bigger mistake. It was clear that the demand in any state that became a battleground would far exceed its allotted contribution; experience had shown that transporting specific items from far away was always tough and costly, and sometimes impossible. Yet no strategies were put in place to meet such unusual demand,[Pg 211] regardless of the country's resources. An even more significant issue with the system was the principle that allowed any state, which made efforts to meet the requisition and informed the U.S. government about it, to prevent continental agents from making any purchases within its borders. Among the states that agreed with Congress's proposal was New Jersey, where the largest army division was stationed. Its legislature enacted a law that prohibited the continental line's staff from buying food within its jurisdiction under strict penalties, and it refused to let its own agents provide for any urgent needs. Another drawback of these requisitions was that they didn't specify any timeframes for when certain amounts of the requested items should be produced, meaning they could be fulfilled even if the army was left without essential supplies for a significant part of the campaign.

These suggestions, however, with others less material to the military operations, did not receive the attention which was due to their importance. A disposition in the members of congress, growing inevitably out of the organization of the government, to consult the will of their respective states, and to prefer that will to any other object, had discovered itself at an[Pg 212] early period, and had gained strength with time. The state of the national treasury was calculated to promote this disposition. It was empty, and could be replenished only by taxes, which congress had not the power to impose; or by new emissions of bills of credit, which the government had pledged the public faith not to make, and which would rest for their redemption only on that faith, which would be violated in the very act of their emission. Under these circumstances, it required a degree of energy seldom found, to struggle with surrounding difficulties for the preservation of a general system, and to resist the temptation to throw the nation at the feet of the states, in whom the vital principle of power, the right to levy taxes, was exclusively vested. While the continental currency preserved its value, this essential defect of the constitution was, in some measure, concealed. The facility with which money was obtained from the press, was a temporary substitute for the command of the resources of the country. But when this expedient failed, it was scarcely possible to advance a single step, but under the guidance of the respective states.

These suggestions, along with others less relevant to military operations, didn't get the attention they deserved. A tendency among members of Congress, inevitably stemming from how the government was organized, to consult the will of their respective states and prioritize it over anything else had shown itself at an[Pg 212] early stage and had gained strength over time. The state of the national treasury contributed to this tendency. It was empty and could only be filled through taxes, which Congress couldn't impose; or by new issues of bills of credit, which the government had promised not to make, and which would rely on that same promise, which would be broken the moment they were issued. Given these circumstances, it took an uncommon amount of energy to navigate the surrounding challenges to maintain a general system and resist the urge to submit the nation to the states, in which the vital principle of power, the right to levy taxes, was solely held. While the continental currency held its value, this fundamental flaw in the constitution was somewhat obscured. The ease of obtaining money from the press served as a temporary substitute for control over the country's resources. But when this approach failed, it became nearly impossible to make any progress without the guidance of the respective states.

Whatever might be the future effect of this system, it was impracticable to bring it into immediate operation. The legislatures of the several states, by whom it was to be adopted, and carried into execution, were, many of them, not then in session; and were to meet at different[Pg 213] times through the ensuing spring. It was consequently to be expected that great part of the summer would pass away before the supplies to be raised by the measure, could be brought into use. In the mean time, and until a new scheme of finance, which accompanied the requisition of specific articles, should be tried, there was no regular provision for the army. Financial regulations.Bills to the amount of £100,000 sterling, payable at six months' sight, were drawn on Mr. Jay, and others to the same amount, on Mr. Laurens, who were empowered to negotiate loans in Europe. These bills were sold in small sums on pressing occasions; and the loan offices remained open for the purpose of borrowing from individuals.

Whatever the future impact of this system may be, it was not practical to implement it right away. Many of the state legislatures that were supposed to adopt and carry it out were not in session at that time; they were scheduled to meet at different[Pg 213] times throughout the upcoming spring. As a result, it was expected that a large part of the summer would pass before the supplies generated by this measure could be utilized. In the meantime, and until a new financial plan, which included the requisition of specific items, could be tested, there was no regular provision for the army. Financial rules.Bills totaling £100,000 sterling, payable in six months, were issued to Mr. Jay, and others for the same amount to Mr. Laurens, who were authorized to negotiate loans in Europe. These bills were sold in smaller amounts during urgent situations, and the loan offices remained open to borrow from individuals.

This new scheme of finance was a second essay to substitute credit unsupported by solid funds, and resting solely on the public faith, for money.

This new financial plan was another attempt to replace credit not backed by real funds and based only on public trust with actual money.

The vast quantity of bills unavoidably emitted before the establishment of regular governments possessing sufficient energy to enforce the collection of taxes, or to provide for their redemption, and before the governments of Europe were sufficiently confident of their stability to afford them aid or credit, was assigned by congress as the principal cause of that depreciation which had taken place in the continental currency. The United States were now, they said, under different circumstances.[Pg 214] Their independence was secure; their civil governments were established and vigorous; and the spirit of their citizens ardent for exertion. The government being thus rendered competent to the object, it was necessary to reduce the quantity of paper in circulation, and to appropriate funds that should ensure the punctual redemption of the bills.

The large number of bills that had to be issued before regular governments were set up, which had enough authority to collect taxes or manage their repayment, and before European governments felt stable enough to provide support or credit, was identified by Congress as the main reason for the depreciation of the continental currency. They stated that the United States was now in a different situation.[Pg 214] Their independence was secure; their civil governments were established and strong; and the spirit of their citizens was eager to take action. With the government now capable of addressing this issue, it became essential to reduce the amount of paper currency in circulation and set aside funds that would guarantee the timely redemption of the bills.

For these purposes, the several states were required to continue to bring into the continental treasury, monthly, from February to April inclusive, their full quotas of fifteen millions of dollars. In complying with this requisition, one Spanish milled dollar was to be received in lieu of forty dollars of the paper currency.

For these purposes, the states were required to continue bringing into the continental treasury, monthly, from February to April inclusive, their full quotas of fifteen million dollars. To meet this requirement, one Spanish milled dollar was accepted in place of forty dollars of the paper currency.

The bills so brought in were not to be reissued, but destroyed; and other bills, not to exceed one dollar for every twenty received in discharge of taxes, were to be emitted.

The bills that were brought in were not to be reissued but destroyed; and other bills, not exceeding one dollar for every twenty received in payment of taxes, were to be issued.

These bills were to be redeemable within six years, and were to bear an interest of five per centum per annum, to be paid at the time of their redemption in specie, or, at the election of the holder, annually, in bills of exchange drawn by the United States on their commissioners in Europe, at four shillings and six pence sterling for each dollar. They were to be issued in ascertained proportions on the funds of the several states, with a collateral security on the part of the government, to pay the quota of any particular state, which the events of the war might[Pg 215] render incapable of complying with its own engagements. The bills were to be deposited in the continental loan-offices of the several states, and were to be signed only as the money then in circulation should be brought in by taxes or otherwise. After being signed, six-tenths of them were to be delivered to the states on whose funds they were to be issued, and the remaining four-tenths to be retained for the use of the continent.

These bonds were meant to be redeemable within six years, and they were to collect an interest of five percent per year, which would be paid at the time of redemption in cash or, at the holder's choice, annually in bills of exchange drawn by the United States on their commissioners in Europe, at four shillings and six pence sterling for each dollar. They were to be issued in specific proportions based on the funds of each state, with additional security from the government to cover the share of any particular state that the events of the war might[Pg 215] make unable to meet its own obligations. The bonds were to be held in the continental loan offices of the various states and would be signed only as the cash circulating at that time was collected through taxes or other means. After being signed, 60% of them were to be given to the states from whose funds they were issued, and the remaining 40% were to be kept for the use of the continent.

The operation of this scheme of finance was necessarily suspended by the same causes which suspended that for requiring specific articles. It depended on the sanction and co-operation of the several state legislatures, many of which were yet to convene.

The operation of this financial plan had to be put on hold due to the same reasons that paused the process of obtaining specific items. It relied on the approval and collaboration of the various state legislatures, many of which still needed to meet.

As it would be impracticable to maintain the value of the money about to be emitted, should the states continue to issue bills of credit, they were earnestly requested to suspend future emissions, and to call the current paper out of circulation. But the time for this measure was not yet arrived, and many of the states continued the use of the press till late in the following year.

As it would be unrealistic to keep the value of the money about to be issued if the states kept printing bills of credit, they were strongly urged to stop future emissions and to withdraw the current paper from circulation. However, the right time for this action hadn't come yet, and many of the states continued to use the press until late in the following year.

The establishment of the army for the ensuing campaign was fixed at thirty-five thousand two hundred and eleven men, and the measures for recruiting it were founded on the state system, which was become entirely predominant.[Pg 216]

The army for the upcoming campaign was set at thirty-five thousand two hundred and eleven men, and the recruitment efforts were based on the state system, which had become completely dominant.[Pg 216]

The few intelligent statesmen who could combine practical good sense with patriotism, perceived the dangerous inefficacy of a system which openly abandoned the national character, and proceeded on the principle that the American confederacy was no more than an alliance of independent nations.

The few smart leaders who could mix common sense with patriotism recognized the serious ineffectiveness of a system that openly disregarded the national identity and operated on the idea that the American confederacy was just a partnership of independent nations.

That great delays would be experienced, that the different parts of the plan would be acted on too unequally and too uncertainly to furnish a solid basis for military calculations, that the system would be totally deranged in its execution, were mischiefs foreseen and lamented by many, as resulting inevitably from a course of measures to which the government of the Union was under the painful necessity of submitting.

That significant delays would occur, that the various parts of the plan would be implemented inconsistently and uncertainly, making it impossible to establish a reliable foundation for military calculations, and that the system would be completely disrupted in its execution, were problems anticipated and regretted by many, as an unavoidable consequence of the actions that the government of the Union had to carry out with great reluctance.

"Certain I am," said the Commander-in-chief, in a confidential letter to a member of the national legislature, "that unless congress speaks in a more decisive tone; unless they are vested with powers by the several states, competent to the great purposes of the war, or assume them as matter of right, and they and the states respectively act with more energy than they hitherto have done, our cause is lost. We can no longer drudge on in the old way. By ill-timing the adoption of measures; by delays in the execution of them, or by unwarrantable jealousies; we incur enormous expenses, and derive no benefit from them. One state will comply with a requisition from congress; another[Pg 217] neglects to do it; a third executes it by halves; and all differ in the manner, the matter, or so much in point of time, that we are all working up hill; and, while such a system as the present one, or rather want of one, prevails, we ever shall be unable to apply our strength or resources to any advantage.

"Sure of it," said the Commander-in-chief in a private letter to a member of Congress, "unless Congress takes a stronger stance; unless they are given powers by the states that are necessary for the war, or assume them as a right, and both they and the states act with more energy than they have so far, our cause is lost. We can't keep going in the old way. By delaying actions or adopting measures poorly timed, or through unnecessary rivalries, we incur huge expenses without any benefit. One state will meet a request from Congress; another neglects it; a third does it partially; and all vary in approach, substance, or timing so much that we're all struggling uphill; and while this current system, or rather the lack of one, continues, we will always be unable to use our strength or resources effectively."

"This, my dear sir, is plain language to a member of congress; but it is the language of truth and friendship. It is the result of long thinking, close application, and strict observation. I see one head gradually changing into thirteen; I see one army branching into thirteen; and, instead of looking up to congress as the supreme controlling power of the United States, consider themselves as dependent on their respective states. In a word, I see the power of congress declining too fast for the respect which is due to them as the great representative body of America, and am fearful of the consequences."

"This, my dear sir, is straightforward language for a member of Congress; but it’s the language of honesty and friendship. It comes from a lot of thoughtful consideration, focused effort, and careful observation. I notice one head slowly becoming thirteen; I see one army splitting into thirteen; and instead of looking up to Congress as the ultimate authority of the United States, they see themselves as reliant on their individual states. In short, I see Congress's power diminishing too quickly for the respect they deserve as the major representative body of America, and I’m worried about the consequences."

But whatever might be his objections to the proposed system, General Washington was unremitting in his endeavours to render the plan perfect in detail, and to give to its execution all the aid which his situation and influence enabled him to afford.

But no matter what his objections to the proposed system were, General Washington was relentless in his efforts to perfect the plan's details and to provide all the support that his position and influence allowed him to give.

The distresses of the army for food, which had found temporary relief in the particular exertions of the magistrates and people of New Jersey, soon returned; and it became once more[Pg 218] necessary, even after the magazines had been in some degree replenished, to recur to the same persons for assistance. The supplies of forage had failed, and a great proportion of the horses had perished, or been rendered unfit for use. Neither funds nor credit were possessed for the purchase of others, and the quarter-master-general found himself unable to transport provisions from remote magazines into camp. This circumstance reduced the Commander-in-chief to the painful necessity of calling on the patriotism of private citizens, under the penalty of a military impressment, should a voluntary contribution be refused, for those means of conveyance which the government could not supply.

The army's struggles for food, which had temporarily eased thanks to the efforts of the local leaders and people of New Jersey, quickly returned. Even after the supplies had been partially restocked, it became necessary again[Pg 218] to seek help from the same individuals. The forage supplies had run out, and many of the horses had died or were no longer usable. There were neither funds nor credit available to buy new ones, and the quarter-master-general found himself unable to move provisions from distant stores to the camp. This situation forced the Commander-in-chief to sadly rely on the goodwill of private citizens, warning them that military seizure would occur if voluntary contributions were refused, for the transportation that the government could not provide.

The want of food was not the only difficulty to be surmounted. Others of a serious nature presented themselves. The pay of an officer was reduced by the depreciation of the currency, to such a miserable pittance as to be unequal to the supply of the most moderate demands. The pay of a major general would no longer hire an express rider, and that of a captain would not purchase the shoes in which he marched. The American officers were not rich; and many of them had expended their little all in the service. If they had exhausted their private funds, or if they possessed none, they could rely only on the state to which they belonged for such clothing as the state might be willing or able to furnish. These supplies were so insufficient and unequal,[Pg 219] as to produce extreme dissatisfaction. In the lines of some of the states, the officers gave notice in a body, of their determination to resign on a given day, if some decent and certain provision should not be made for them. The remonstrances of the Commander-in-chief produced an offer to serve as volunteers until their successors should be appointed; and, on the rejection of this proposition, they were with difficulty induced to remain in service.

The lack of food wasn’t the only challenge to deal with. Other serious issues arose. An officer’s pay had dropped drastically due to the devaluation of currency, leaving them with an almost laughable amount that couldn't meet even the most basic needs. The salary of a major general was no longer enough to hire a messenger, and a captain's pay wouldn’t even cover the cost of the shoes he marched in. American officers weren’t wealthy, and many had spent their entire savings on their service. If they had used up their personal funds or didn’t have any, they could only depend on their state for whatever clothing it was willing or able to provide. These supplies were so inadequate and inconsistent,[Pg 219] that it led to significant frustration. In some state lines, officers collectively announced that they would resign on a specific day if they weren’t provided with decent and reliable support. The Commander-in-chief’s protests resulted in an offer to serve as volunteers until replacements were found; however, after rejecting this proposal, they were only reluctantly persuaded to keep serving.

Under these complicated embarrassments, it required all that enthusiastic patriotism which pre-eminently distinguishes the soldier of principle; all that ardent attachment to the cause of their country which originally brought them into the field, and which their sufferings could not diminish; all the influence of the Commander-in-chief, whom they almost adored; to retain in the service men who felt themselves neglected, and who believed themselves to be the objects of the jealousy of their country, rather than of its gratitude.

Under these complicated difficulties, it took all the passionate patriotism that truly sets apart a principled soldier; all the deep love for their country's cause that initially drove them to join the fight, and which their hardships couldn't lessen; and all the influence of the Commander-in-chief, whom they nearly worshipped, to keep in the service men who felt overlooked and believed they were the targets of their country's jealousy instead of its gratitude.

Among the privates, causes of disgust grew out of the very composition of the army, which increased the dissatisfaction produced by their multiplied wants.

Among the soldiers, feelings of disgust arose from the very makeup of the army, which heightened the discontent caused by their growing needs.

The first effort made to enlist troops for the war had, in some degree, succeeded. While these men found themselves obliged to continue in service without compensation, and often without the common necessaries of life, they per[Pg 220]ceived the vacant ranks in their regiments filled up by men who were to continue only for a few months, and who received bounties for that short service, from individuals or from the states, which were of great real value, and which appeared to soldiers not acquainted with the actual state of depreciation, to be immense. They could not fail to compare situations, and to repine at engagements which deprived them of advantages which they saw in possession of others. Many were induced to contest those engagements;[36] many to desert a service in which they experienced such irritating inequalities; and all felt with the more poignant indignation, those distressing failures in the commissary department, which so frequently recurred.

The first effort to recruit soldiers for the war had, to some extent, been successful. While these men had to continue serving without pay and often without basic necessities, they noticed that the empty positions in their regiments were being filled by new recruits who would only serve for a few months and were receiving bounties from individuals or the states that were of significant value. To soldiers who weren't aware of the actual depreciation, these bounties seemed enormous. They couldn't help but compare their situations and feel frustrated about the commitments that robbed them of the advantages they saw others enjoying. Many were tempted to challenge those commitments; many chose to desert a service where they faced such frustrating inequalities; and all felt even greater indignation at the frequent, distressing failures of the supply department.

Committee of Congress deputed to camp.

In consequence of the strong representations made to congress on these various causes of disquiet, a committee of three members repaired to camp for the purpose of consulting with the Commander-in-chief on such arrangements as the means in possession of the government would enable it to make, and the present state of the army might require. In representing the condition of the troops, they said, "That the army was unpaid for five months; that it seldom had more than six days' provisions in advance, and was on several occasions, for several successive days,[Pg 221] without meat; that the army was destitute of forage; that the medical department had neither tea, chocolate, wine, nor spirituous liquors of any kind; that every department of the army was without money, and had not even the shadow of credit left; that the patience of the soldiers, borne down by the pressure of complicated sufferings, was on the point of being exhausted."

As a result of the strong concerns expressed to Congress about these various issues, a committee of three members went to the camp to discuss arrangements with the Commander-in-Chief based on what the government could provide and what the current state of the army required. They reported on the condition of the troops, stating, "The army has not been paid for five months; it rarely has more than six days' worth of supplies in advance, and has often gone several days in a row without any meat; the army is lacking forage; the medical department has no tea, chocolate, wine, or any kind of alcohol; every department of the army is out of money and has absolutely no credit left; the soldiers’ patience, burdened by a range of hardships, is about to run out."

To relieve this gloomy state of things by transfusing into it a ray of hope for the future, a resolution was passed, declaring that congress would make good to the line of the army, and to the independent corps thereof, the deficiency of their original pay, which had been occasioned by the depreciation of the continental currency; and that the money or other articles heretofore received, should be considered as advanced on account, to be comprehended in the settlement to be finally made. The benefits of this resolution were confined to those who were then in actual service, or should thereafter come into it, and who were engaged for the war or for three years.

To improve this bleak situation by bringing in a bit of hope for the future, a resolution was passed stating that Congress would compensate the army and its independent units for the shortfall in their original pay caused by the decline in the value of the continental currency. It also established that any money or items received previously would be counted as advances and included in the final settlement. The advantages of this resolution were limited to those who were currently serving or would join later, and who had committed to the war or a three-year term.

This resolution was published in general orders, and had considerable influence on the army, but not sufficient to remove the various causes of dissatisfaction which existed, and were continually multiplying. The engagement to make good the depreciation of their pay, was an act of justice too long withheld; and no promise for the future, could supply the place of present comfortable subsistence. No hope was given[Pg 222] that their condition, in this respect, would be improved. For a considerable time, the troops received only from one-half to one-eighth of a ration of meat; and, at length, were several days without a single pound of that necessary article.

This resolution was announced in general orders and had a significant impact on the army, but it wasn’t enough to solve the various sources of dissatisfaction that existed and were continuously increasing. The commitment to compensate for the reduction in their pay was a long-overdue act of justice; no promises for the future could replace the need for immediate, decent living conditions. There was no indication[Pg 222] that their situation would get better in this regard. For an extended period, the troops received only between one-half and one-eighth of a meat ration, and eventually went several days without receiving even a single pound of that essential item.

This long course of suffering had unavoidably produced some relaxation of discipline, and had gradually soured the minds of the soldiers to such a degree, that their discontents broke out into actual mutiny.

This extended period of hardship had inevitably led to a loosening of discipline and had slowly soured the soldiers' attitudes to the point where their frustrations erupted into outright rebellion.

May 25.

On the 25th of May, two regiments belonging to Connecticut paraded under arms with a declared resolution to return home, or to obtain subsistence at the point of the bayonet. The soldiers of the other regiments, though not actually joining the mutineers, showed no disposition to suppress the mutiny. By great exertions on the part of the officers, aided by the appearance of a neighbouring brigade of Pennsylvania, then commanded by Colonel Stewart, the leaders were secured, and the two regiments brought back to their duty. Some sentiments, however, were disclosed by the soldiers, in answer to the remonstrances of their officers, of a serious and alarming nature. Their pay was now five months in arrear, and the depreciation of the money, they said, was such, that it would be worth nothing when received. When reminded of the late resolution of congress for making good the loss sustained by depreciation, of the reputation acquired by their past good conduct,[Pg 223] and of the value of the object for which they were contending; they answered that their sufferings were too great to be longer supported; that they wanted present relief; and must have some present substantial recompense for their services. A paper was found in the brigade, which appeared to have been brought by some emissary from New York, stimulating the troops to the abandonment of the cause in which they were engaged.

On May 25th, two regiments from Connecticut marched with the intention to either go home or get food by force. The soldiers from other regiments, while not actively joining the mutineers, didn’t show any eagerness to stop the revolt. Thanks to significant efforts from the officers, along with the presence of a nearby brigade from Pennsylvania led by Colonel Stewart, the leaders were captured, and the two regiments were brought back to their duties. However, some troubling feelings were revealed by the soldiers in response to their officers' objections. They hadn’t been paid in five months, and they claimed that the money had depreciated so much that it would be worthless by the time they received it. When reminded about Congress's recent decision to cover losses from that depreciation and the respect they had earned for their past performance, they replied that their suffering had become too much to bear; they wanted immediate relief and needed some tangible compensation for their service. A document was discovered in the brigade that seemed to have been sent by someone from New York, encouraging the troops to abandon the cause they were fighting for.

June 6.

The discontents of the army, and the complaints excited in the country by the frequent requisitions on the people of New Jersey, had been communicated, with such exaggeration, to the officer commanding in New York, as to induce the opinion that the American soldiers were ready to desert their standards; and the people of New Jersey to change their government. General Knyphausen enters Jersey.To countenance these dispositions, General Knyphausen embarked at Staten Island, and landed in the night with about five thousand men at Elizabethtown Point, in New Jersey. Early next morning he marched towards Springfield, by the way of Connecticut Farms, but soon perceived that the real temper, both of the country and the army, had been misunderstood.

The army's dissatisfaction and the complaints from the people of New Jersey about the constant demands placed on them had been exaggerated when conveyed to the officer in charge in New York. This created the impression that the American soldiers were about to abandon their posts and that the people of New Jersey wanted a change in their government. General Knyphausen arrives in Jersey. To support these movements, General Knyphausen set sail from Staten Island and landed in the night with about five thousand troops at Elizabethtown Point in New Jersey. Early the next morning, he marched toward Springfield through Connecticut Farms, but soon realized that he had misjudged the actual feelings of both the region and the army.

On the appearance of the enemy, the militia assembled with alacrity, and aided the small patrolling parties of continental troops in harassing him on his march from Elizabethtown to the Connecticut Farms, a distance of five or[Pg 224] six miles, where a halt was made. In a spirit of revenge, unworthy the general of an army, more in the character of Tryon who was present, than of Knyphausen who commanded, this settlement was reduced to ashes.[37]

On seeing the enemy, the militia quickly gathered and helped the small patrols of continental troops in bothering him as he marched from Elizabethtown to Connecticut Farms, about five or[Pg 224] six miles away, where he stopped. In a spirit of revenge, which was unworthy of an army general, more resembling Tryon, who was present, rather than Knyphausen, who was in charge, this settlement was set on fire.[37]

From the Farms, Knyphausen proceeded to Springfield. The Jersey brigade, commanded by General Maxwell, and the militia of the adjacent country, took an advantageous position at that place, and seemed determined to defend it. Knyphausen halted in its neighbourhood, and remained on his ground until night.

From the Farms, Knyphausen moved on to Springfield. The Jersey brigade, led by General Maxwell, along with the local militia, took up a strong position there and appeared ready to defend it. Knyphausen stopped nearby and stayed in his position until nightfall.

Having received intelligence of this movement, General Washington put his army in motion early in the same morning that Knyphausen marched from Elizabethtown Point, and advanced to the Short Hills, in the rear of Springfield, while the British were in the neighbourhood of that place. Dispositions were made for an engagement the next morning, but Knyphausen retired in the night to the place of his disembarkation.[Pg 225]

Having received information about this movement, General Washington got his army moving early on the same morning that Knyphausen marched from Elizabethtown Point and advanced to the Short Hills, behind Springfield, while the British were nearby. Plans were made for a battle the next morning, but Knyphausen withdrew at night to the location where he had landed.[Pg 225]

General Washington continued on the hills near Springfield, too weak to hazard an engagement, but on ground chosen by himself. His continental troops did not exceed three thousand men. A return of the whole army under his immediate command, made on the 3d of June, exhibited in the column, of present, fit for duty, only three thousand seven hundred and sixty, rank and file. So reduced was that force on which America relied for independence. "You but too well know," said General Washington in a letter to a friend, giving an account of this incursion, "and will regret with me the cause which justifies this insulting manœuvre on the part of the enemy. It deeply affects the honour of the states, a vindication of which could not be attempted in our present circumstances, without most intimately hazarding their security; at least so far as it may depend on the preservation of the army. Their character, their interest, their all that is dear, call upon them in the most pressing manner, to place the army immediately on a respectable footing."

General Washington remained on the hills near Springfield, too weak to risk a battle, but on ground he chose himself. His Continental troops were not more than three thousand strong. A report from the whole army under his immediate command, made on June 3rd, showed that only three thousand seven hundred sixty were present and fit for duty. Such was the reduced force that America depended on for its independence. "You know all too well," General Washington wrote in a letter to a friend detailing this situation, "and will share my regret over the reason that justifies this insulting maneuver by the enemy. It deeply affects the honor of the states, and we cannot attempt to vindicate it in our current circumstances without significantly risking their security, particularly as it relates to preserving the army. Their reputation, their interests, everything they hold dear, urgently call for them to put the army on a more respectable footing immediately."

The long continuance of Knyphausen at Elizabethtown, strengthened a suspicion that Sir Henry Clinton was about to return from South Carolina, and intended, without disembarking his troops, to proceed up the Hudson to West Point; and that the movement into Jersey was a feint designed to cover the real object.[Pg 226]

The extended stay of Knyphausen in Elizabethtown fueled suspicion that Sir Henry Clinton was planning to return from South Carolina and intended to move his troops up the Hudson to West Point without unloading them. The operation in Jersey was seen as a distraction meant to conceal the actual plan.[Pg 226]

The letters of the Commander-in-chief, addressed about this period, to those who might be supposed to possess influence in the government of the Union, or in those of the states, exhibit his conjectures respecting the designs of his adversary, as well as his apprehensions from the condition of his own army. To the committee of congress, in camp, he observed, "General Knyphausen still continues in the Jerseys with all the force which can be spared from New York, a force greatly superior to ours. Should Sir Henry join him, their superiority will be decided, and equal to almost any thing they may think proper to attempt. The enemy, it is true, are at this time inactive; but their continuance in their present position proves that they have some project of importance in contemplation. Perhaps they are only waiting until the militia grow tired and return home, (which they are doing every hour,) to prosecute their designs with the less opposition. This would be a critical moment for us. Perhaps they are waiting the arrival of Sir Henry Clinton, either to push up the North River against the Highland posts, or to bend their whole force against this army. In either case, the most disastrous consequences are to be apprehended. You, who are well acquainted with our situation, need no arguments to evince the danger.

The letters from the Commander-in-chief around this time, addressed to those who might have influence in the government of the Union or in the states, reflect his thoughts on his opponent’s plans and his concerns about his own army's condition. While speaking to the committee of Congress in camp, he noted, "General Knyphausen is still in the Jerseys with all the forces that can be spared from New York, which are much stronger than ours. If Sir Henry joins him, their advantage will be substantial, allowing them to attempt almost anything they want. It’s true the enemy is currently inactive, but their stay in this position suggests they have some significant plan in mind. They might just be waiting for the militia to get tired and go home, which is happening every hour, so they can carry out their plans with less resistance. This could be a critical moment for us. They might be waiting for Sir Henry Clinton to arrive, either to move up the North River against the Highland posts or to focus all their force against our army. In either scenario, the potential for disastrous outcomes is real. You, who are well aware of our situation, understand the inherent danger without needing further explanation."

"The militia of this state have run to arms, and behaved with an ardour and spirit of which[Pg 227] there are few examples. But perseverance, in enduring the rigours of military service, is not to be expected from those who are not by profession obliged to it. The reverse of this opinion has been a great misfortune in our affairs, and it is high time we should recover from an error of so pernicious a nature. We must absolutely have a force of a different composition, or we must relinquish the contest. In a few days, we may expect to rely almost entirely on our continental force, and this, from your own observation, is totally inadequate to our safety. The exigency calls loudly on the states to carry all the recommendations of the committee into the most vigorous and immediate execution; but more particularly that for completing our batteries by a draught with all possible expedition."

"The state militia has taken up arms and shown a level of enthusiasm and determination that is rare. However, we can't expect people who aren't trained professionals to endure the hardships of military service for long. Holding onto the opposite idea has been a significant setback for us, and it's about time we correct such a harmful mistake. We absolutely need a different type of force, or we have to give up the fight. In a few days, we can almost entirely rely on our continental forces, which, as you've noted, are clearly not enough for our safety. The situation urgently demands that the states implement all the committee's recommendations as quickly and effectively as possible; particularly the one about completing our defenses as fast as we can."

June 18.
Sir Henry Clinton returns to New York.

In this precise state of things, he received intelligence of the return of Sir Henry Clinton from the conquest of South Carolina.

In this specific situation, he got news about Sir Henry Clinton's return from conquering South Carolina.

The regular force in New York and its dependencies was now estimated at twelve thousand men, great part of whom might be drawn into the field for any particular purpose, because Sir Henry Clinton could command about four thousand militia and refugees for garrison duty.

The regular army in New York and its territories was now estimated to be around twelve thousand soldiers, most of whom could be deployed for specific tasks, since Sir Henry Clinton could call upon about four thousand militia and refugees for garrison duty.

In communicating to congress the appearance of the British fleet off the Hook, General Washington observed, "a very alarming scene may shortly open, and it will be happy for us if we[Pg 228] shall be able to steer clear of some serious misfortune in this quarter. I hope the period has not yet arrived, which will convince the different states by fatal experience, that some of them have mistaken the true situation of this country. I flatter myself, however, that we may still retrieve our affairs if we have but a just sense of them, and are actuated by a spirit of liberal policy and exertion equal to the emergency. Could we once see this spirit generally prevailing, I should not despair of a prosperous issue of the campaign. But there is no time to be lost. The danger is imminent and pressing; the obstacles to be surmounted are great and numerous; and our efforts must be instant, unreserved, and universal."

In addressing Congress about the British fleet's presence off the Hook, General Washington remarked, "A very alarming situation may soon unfold, and it would be fortunate for us if we[Pg 228] can avoid some serious misfortune in this area. I hope the time hasn't come yet that will make the different states realize through tragic experience that some of them have misunderstood the true state of this country. I still believe we can turn things around if we have a proper understanding of our situation and are driven by a spirit of open-mindedness and effort that matches the seriousness of our challenges. If we can see this spirit spreading widely, I would not lose hope for a successful outcome of the campaign. But we can't waste any time. The danger is immediate and severe; the obstacles we face are significant and numerous; and our actions must be swift, complete, and unified."

On the arrival of Sir Henry Clinton, the design of acting offensively in the Jerseys was resumed; but, to divide the American army, demonstrations were made of an intention to seize West Point. To be in readiness for either object, General Greene was left at Springfield with two brigades of continental troops, and with the Jersey militia; while, with the greater part of his army, General Washington proceeded slowly towards Pompton, watching attentively the movements of the British, and apparently unwilling to separate himself too far from Greene. He had not marched farther than Rockaway, eleven miles beyond Morristown, when the British army advanced from[Pg 229] Elizabethtown towards Springfield in great force. General Washington detached a brigade to hang on their right flank, and returned with the residue of his army five or six miles, in order to be in a situation to support Greene.

On the arrival of Sir Henry Clinton, the plan to take offensive action in the Jerseys was picked up again; however, to split the American army, there were signals of a plan to take West Point. To be ready for either situation, General Greene was left at Springfield with two brigades of Continental troops and the Jersey militia. Meanwhile, with most of his army, General Washington moved slowly towards Pompton, closely monitoring the British movements and seemingly reluctant to get too far from Greene. He hadn't gone more than Rockaway, eleven miles past Morristown, when the British army advanced from[Pg 229] Elizabethtown towards Springfield in strong numbers. General Washington sent a brigade to follow their right flank and then moved the rest of his army back five or six miles to be in a position to support Greene.

June.

Early in the morning of the 23d, the British army moved in two columns, with great rapidity, towards Springfield. Major Lee was advanced on the Vauxhall road, which was taken by the right column; and Colonel Dayton on the direct road, which was taken by the left. Both these corps made every possible exertion to check the advancing enemy, while General Greene concentrated his little army at Springfield. Skirmish at Springfield.Scarcely had he made his dispositions, when the British front appeared, and a cannonade commenced between their van and the American artillery which defended a bridge over Rahway, a small river running east of the town, which was guarded by Colonel Angel with less than two hundred men. Colonel Shreve was posted at a second bridge, also over a branch of the Rahway, in order to cover the retreat of Angel from the first. Major Lee with his dragoons and the piquets under Captain Walker, supported by Colonel Ogden, was directed to defend a bridge on the Vauxhall road. The residue of the continental troops were drawn up on high ground, in the rear of the town, with the militia on their flanks.[Pg 230]

Early in the morning of the 23rd, the British army moved quickly in two columns toward Springfield. Major Lee advanced on the Vauxhall road, which was taken by the right column, while Colonel Dayton took the direct road for the left column. Both groups did everything they could to stop the advancing enemy, while General Greene gathered his small army at Springfield. Battle at Springfield. Just as he set up his troops, the British front appeared, and cannon fire broke out between their vanguard and the American artillery defending a bridge over the Rahway, a small river east of the town, guarded by Colonel Angel with fewer than two hundred men. Colonel Shreve was stationed at a second bridge, also over a branch of the Rahway, to cover the retreat of Angel from the first. Major Lee, along with his dragoons and the pickets under Captain Walker, supported by Colonel Ogden, was directed to defend a bridge on the Vauxhall road. The rest of the continental troops were positioned on high ground behind the town, with the militia on their flanks.[Pg 230]

The right column of the British advanced on Lee, who disputed the passage of the bridge until a considerable body of the enemy forded the river above him, and gained the point of a hill which endangered his position. At this instant, their left attacked Colonel Angel, who defended himself with persevering gallantry. The conflict was sharp, and was maintained for about half an hour, when, compelled by superior numbers to give way, he retired in good order, and brought off his wounded. His retreat was covered by Colonel Shreve, who, after Angel had passed him, was ordered by General Greene to join his brigade. The English then took possession of the town and reduced it to ashes.

The British right flank advanced on Lee, who resisted their crossing of the bridge until a significant number of enemy troops crossed the river upstream and took a hill that threatened his position. At that moment, their left side attacked Colonel Angel, who fought back with incredible bravery. The fight was intense and lasted about half an hour, but eventually, he had to retreat due to being outnumbered. He withdrew in good order, managing to bring his wounded with him. His retreat was protected by Colonel Shreve, who, once Angel had passed, was instructed by General Greene to rejoin his brigade. The British then captured the town and set it on fire.

The obstinate resistance which had been encountered; the gallantry and discipline displayed by the continental troops who had been engaged; the strength of Greene's position; the firm countenance maintained by his troops, small detachments of whom kept up a continual skirmishing with a view to save a part of the town; all contributed to deter Sir Henry Clinton from a farther prosecution of his original plan. He withdrew that afternoon to Elizabethtown; and, in the following night, passed over to Staten Island. It is probable that the caution manifested during this expedition is to be ascribed to the intelligence that a formidable fleet and army from France was daily expected on the coast.[Pg 231]

The stubborn resistance faced; the bravery and discipline shown by the Continental troops involved; the strength of Greene's position; the steady demeanor maintained by his troops, with small detachments continuously skirmishing to defend part of the town; all of these factors discouraged Sir Henry Clinton from further pursuing his original plan. He withdrew that afternoon to Elizabethtown and, that night, crossed over to Staten Island. It's likely that the caution displayed during this expedition was due to the knowledge that a powerful fleet and army from France were expected to arrive on the coast at any moment.[Pg 231]

When the Marquis de Lafayette obtained permission to visit his native country, he retained, with his rank in the American army, that zeal for the interests of the United States, which the affectionate attentions he had received, and the enthusiasm of a soldier in the cause of those for whom he had made his first campaigns, were calculated to inspire in a young and generous mind, in favour of an infant people, struggling for liberty and self-government with the hereditary rival of his nation.

When the Marquis de Lafayette got permission to visit his home country, he kept, along with his rank in the American army, a strong passion for the interests of the United States. The kindness he had experienced and the excitement of a soldier fighting for the people he had supported in his first campaigns inspired a young and generous spirit in favor of an emerging nation fighting for liberty and self-government against the traditional rival of his own country.

He was received at the court of Versailles with every mark of favour and distinction;[38] and all his influence was employed in impressing on the cabinet, the importance and policy of granting succours to the United States.

He was welcomed at the court of Versailles with every sign of favor and distinction;[38] and all his influence was used to emphasize to the cabinet the importance and strategy of providing aid to the United States.

Having succeeded in this favourite object, and finding no probability of active employment on the continent of Europe, he obtained permission to return to America. Lafayette brings intelligence of aid from France.He arrived late in April at Boston, and hastened to head quarters; whence he proceeded to the seat of Government with the information that his most Christian Majesty had consented to employ a considerable land and naval armament in the United States, for the ensuing campaign. This[Pg 232] intelligence gave a new impulse both to congress and the state legislatures. Exertions of Congress and of the Commander-in-chief to strengthen the army.The states from New Hampshire to Virginia inclusive were required to pay, within thirty days, ten millions of dollars, part of their quotas which became due on the first of March; and specie bills to the amount of fifty thousand dollars were drawn on Messieurs Franklin and Jay. These sums were sacredly appropriated to the objects of bringing the army into the field, and forwarding their supplies.

Having achieved this important goal, and seeing no chance for active duty in Europe, he got permission to return to America. Lafayette brings news of support from France. He arrived in Boston late in April and quickly went to headquarters; from there, he proceeded to the seat of Government with the news that his most Christian Majesty had agreed to send a significant land and naval force to the United States for the upcoming campaign. This[Pg 232] news energized both Congress and the state legislatures. Actions by Congress and the President to improve the military. The states from New Hampshire to Virginia were required to pay, within thirty days, ten million dollars as part of their quotas that were due on March 1; and specie bills totaling fifty thousand dollars were drawn on Messieurs Franklin and Jay. These funds were strictly designated for getting the army into the field and ensuring their supplies.

The defects in the requisition system, which had been suggested by General Washington, were corrected; and the committee in camp, at the head of which was the late General Schuyler, was empowered, at the request of the Commander-in-chief, to take such measures as were in the power of congress, for drawing out the resources of the nation.

The problems in the requisition system, which General Washington had pointed out, were fixed; and the committee in camp, led by the late General Schuyler, was authorized, at the request of the Commander-in-chief, to take whatever actions congress could to tap into the nation's resources.

To give effect to these resolutions, the several state legislatures from New Hampshire to Virginia inclusive, were requested to invest the Executives, or some other persons, with powers sufficiently ample to comply with such applications as might be made to them by the committee in camp, and a circular letter was addressed to the state governments, urging them to second the efforts of Congress.

To implement these resolutions, the state legislatures from New Hampshire to Virginia were asked to give the Executives, or other individuals, enough authority to handle requests that might come from the committee in camp, and a circular letter was sent to the state governments encouraging them to support the efforts of Congress.

Letters equally stimulating were written by the committee from camp; and the well earned influence of the Commander-in-chief was also[Pg 233] employed to induce an exertion proportioned to the crisis. In addition to those incentives which might operate on ardent minds, he endeavoured, by a temperate review of the situation and resources of the belligerent powers, to convince the judgment that America would have real cause to fear the issue of the contest, should she neglect to improve the advantage to be afforded by the succours expected from France.[39]

Letters that were just as motivating were sent by the committee from camp; and the well-deserved influence of the Commander-in-chief was also[Pg 233] used to encourage efforts proportional to the crisis. Besides those motivations that might appeal to passionate minds, he attempted, through a clear examination of the situation and resources of the fighting powers, to persuade others that America would have legitimate reasons to fear the outcome of the conflict if she failed to take advantage of the support expected from France.[39]

Under the impressions produced by these representations, the state legislatures, generally, passed the laws which were required; but the energy displayed in their passage was not maintained in their execution. In general, the assemblies followed the example of congress, and apportioned on the several counties or towns within the state, the quota to be furnished by each. This division of the state was again to be subdivided into classes, each of which was to furnish a man by contributions or taxes imposed upon itself.

Under the influence of these representations, the state legislatures mostly passed the necessary laws; however, the enthusiasm shown in passing them wasn’t kept up during their implementation. Generally, the assemblies mirrored Congress and divided the responsibilities among the various counties or towns within the state for the quotas each had to provide. This division of the state was then further broken down into classes, with each class required to contribute by providing a man through contributions or taxes imposed on itself.

Tardy proceedings of the states.

These operations were slow and unproductive.

These operations were slow and not efficient.

It was not on the state sovereignties only that beneficial effects were produced by a candid statement of public affairs, several patriotic individuals contributed largely from their private funds to the aid of the public. The merchants, and other citizens of Philadelphia, with a zeal guided by that sound discretion which turns expenditure to the best account, established a bank,[Pg 234] for the support of which they subscribed £315,000, Pennsylvania money, to be paid, if required, in specie, the principal object of which was to supply the army with provisions and rum. By the plan of this bank, its members were to derive no emolument whatever from the institution. For advancing their credit and their money, they required only that congress should pledge the faith of the Union to reimburse the costs and charges of the transaction in a reasonable time, and should give such assistance to its execution as might be in their power.

It wasn’t just the state governments that benefited from a transparent discussion of public issues; many patriotic individuals also made significant contributions from their own resources to support the public. The merchants and other residents of Philadelphia, with enthusiasm and wise judgment that optimizes spending, set up a bank,[Pg 234] for which they collectively pledged £315,000 in Pennsylvania currency, to be paid in cash if necessary. The main goal of this bank was to provide the army with food and rum. According to the structure of this bank, its members would receive no financial gain from it. In exchange for their backing and their money, they only asked that Congress commit the Union’s guarantee to repay the expenses and costs in a timely manner and to offer any assistance they could in making it happen.

The ladies of Philadelphia too gave a splendid example of patriotism, by large donations for the immediate relief of the suffering army. This example was extensively followed;[40] but it is not by the contributions of the generous that a war can or ought to be maintained. The purse of the nation alone can supply the expenditures[Pg 235] of a nation; and, when all are interested in a contest, all ought to contribute to its support. Taxes, and taxes only, can furnish for the prosecution of a national war, means which are just in themselves, or competent to the object. Notwithstanding these donations, the distresses of the army, for clothing especially, still continued; and were the more severely felt when a co-operation with French troops was expected. So late as the 20th of June, General Washington informed congress, that he still laboured under the painful and humiliating embarrassment of having no shirts for the soldiers, many of whom were destitute of that necessary article. "For the troops to be without clothing at any time," he added, "is highly injurious to the service, and distressing to our feelings; but the want will be more peculiarly mortifying when they come to act with those of our allies. If it be possible, I have no doubt, immediate measures will be taken to relieve their distress.

The women of Philadelphia also set a great example of patriotism by making large donations to help the suffering army. This example was widely followed; [40] but it's not just the contributions of the generous that can or should sustain a war. Only the nation's finances can cover the expenses[Pg 235] of a country; and when everyone has a stake in a conflict, everyone should help support it. Taxes, and only taxes, can provide the necessary resources for conducting a national war that are fair or suitable for the purpose. Despite these donations, the army's struggles, especially for clothing, continued and were felt even more acutely when cooperation with French troops was anticipated. As late as June 20th, General Washington informed Congress that he was still dealing with the painful and embarrassing situation of having no shirts for the soldiers, many of whom lacked this essential item. "For the troops to be without clothing at any time," he added, "is highly detrimental to the service and upsetting to our feelings; but the lack will be especially humiliating when they need to work alongside our allies. If it's possible, I have no doubt that immediate measures will be taken to address their distress."

"It is also most sincerely wished, that there could be some supplies of clothing furnished to the officers. There are a great many whose condition is still miserable. This is, in some instances, the case with the whole lines of the states. It would be well for their own sakes, and for the public good, if they could be furnished. They will not be able, when our friends come to co-operate with us, to go on a common routine[Pg 236] of duty; and if they should, they must, from their appearance, be held in low estimation."

"It is sincerely hoped that some clothing supplies can be provided to the officers. Many of them are still in terrible condition. In some cases, this is true for entire state lines. It would benefit both them and the public good if they could be supplied. When our allies come to support us, they won’t be able to perform a normal routine of duty; and if they do, their appearance will lead to them being looked down upon."

This picture presents in strong colours, the real patriotism of the American army. One heroic effort, though it may dazzle the mind with its splendour, is an exertion most men are capable of making; but continued patient suffering and unremitting perseverance, in a service promising no personal emolument, and exposing the officer unceasingly, not only to wants of every kind, but to those circumstances of humiliation which seem to degrade him in the eyes of others, demonstrate a fortitude of mind, a strength of virtue, and a firmness of principle, which ought never to be forgotten.

This picture vividly showcases the true patriotism of the American army. One heroic act, while it can inspire awe with its brilliance, is an effort that most people can manage; however, ongoing, patient suffering and relentless perseverance, in a role that offers no personal reward and continually exposes the officer to various hardships, along with situations of humiliation that seem to diminish their worth in the eyes of others, reveal a deep mental fortitude, a strong moral character, and a steadfast principle that should never be overlooked.

As the several legislative acts for bringing the army into the field, did not pass until the months of June and July, General Washington remained uninformed of the force on which he might rely, and was consequently unable to form any certain plan of operations.

As the various laws to deploy the army weren't passed until June and July, General Washington stayed unaware of the strength he could count on and, as a result, couldn't develop a solid operational plan.

This suspense was the more cruelly embarrassing, as, in the event of an attempt upon New York, it was of the utmost importance that the French fleet should, on its arrival, take possession of the harbour, which was then weakly defended. But, should this measure be followed by a failure to furnish the requisite support, it would not only be ineffectual; but, in a very possible state of things, might sacrifice the fleet itself.[Pg 237]

This suspense was even more painfully awkward because, if there was an attack on New York, it was crucial for the French fleet to secure the harbor upon arrival, which was poorly defended at the time. However, if this action was not followed by the necessary support, it would not only be pointless but could potentially jeopardize the fleet itself.[Pg 237]

Should it be ascertained that the states were either unable or unwilling to make the exertions necessary for the siege of New York, other objects presented themselves against which the allied arms might be turned to advantage. To avoid the disgrace and danger of attempting what could not be effected, and the reproach of neglecting any attainable object, were equally desirable, and equally required a correct knowledge of the measures which would be taken by the states.

Should it be determined that the states were either unable or unwilling to make the necessary efforts for the siege of New York, there were other targets that the allied forces could focus on. It was important to avoid the shame and risks of trying something that couldn’t be accomplished, as well as the blame for ignoring any feasible goals. Both of these considerations required a clear understanding of the actions that would be taken by the states.

In a letter to congress communicating his anxiety on this interesting subject, and his total want of information respecting it, General Washington observed, "The season is come when we have every reason to expect the arrival of the fleet, and yet, for want of this point of primary consequence, it is impossible for me to form a system of co-operation. I have no basis to act upon; and, of course, were this generous succour of our ally now to arrive, I should find myself in the most awkward, embarrassing, and painful situation. The general and the admiral, from the relation in which I stand, as soon as they approach our coast, will require of me a plan of the measures to be pursued, and there ought of right to be one prepared; but circumstanced as I am, I can not even give them conjectures. From these considerations, I have suggested to the committee, by a letter I had the honour of addressing them yesterday, the[Pg 238] indispensable necessity of their writing again to the states, urging them to give immediate and precise information of the measures they have taken and of the result. The interest of the states, the honour and reputation of our councils, the justice and gratitude due to our allies, all require that I should, without delay, be enabled to ascertain and inform them, what we can or can not undertake. There is a point which ought now to be determined, on the success of which all our future operations may depend, on which, for want of knowing our prospects, I can make no decision. For fear of involving the fleet and army of our allies in circumstances which would expose them, if not seconded by us, to material inconvenience and hazard, I shall be compelled to suspend it, and the delay may be fatal to our hopes."

In a letter to Congress expressing his concerns about this important issue and his complete lack of information regarding it, General Washington noted, "The time has come when we fully expect the fleet's arrival, and yet, due to this critical missing information, I cannot develop a coordinated plan. I have no foundation to act on; therefore, if this much-needed support from our ally were to arrive now, I would find myself in an extremely awkward, embarrassing, and painful position. The general and the admiral, given my role, will expect a plan of action from me as soon as they reach our coastline, and one should rightfully be prepared; but given my circumstances, I cannot even provide them with guesses. Because of this, I have suggested to the committee, in a letter I was honored to send them yesterday, the[Pg 238] urgent need for them to write again to the states, asking them to provide immediate and clear information about the actions they have taken and their outcomes. The interests of the states, the honor and reputation of our leaders, and the justice and gratitude owed to our allies all demand that I be enabled to determine and inform them, without delay, what we can or cannot undertake. There's a crucial decision that needs to be made now, the outcome of which could affect all our future operations, and I cannot make any decision without knowing our prospects. In order to avoid putting the fleet and army of our allies in situations that would expose them to significant risk and inconvenience if we do not support them, I will have to hold off any plans, and this delay could be disastrous for our hopes."

The tardy proceedings of the states were not less perplexing to congress than to the Commander-in-chief. To the minister of his most Christian Majesty, who had in the preceding January communicated the probability of receiving succour from France, that body, without calculating accurately the means of complying with its engagements, had pledged itself unequivocally for effectual co-operation. The minister was assured, that the United States had expectations on which they could rely with confidence, of bringing into the field, for the next campaign, an army of twenty-five thousand[Pg 239] men; and that such numbers of militia might be added to this continental force, as would render it competent to any enterprise against the posts occupied by the British within the United States.

The slow actions of the states were just as confusing to Congress as they were to the Commander-in-chief. To the minister of his Most Christian Majesty, who had mentioned in January the likelihood of receiving support from France, Congress had, without properly assessing their ability to meet their commitments, promised unequivocally to provide effective cooperation. The minister was told that the United States confidently expected to bring an army of twenty-five thousand[Pg 239] men into the field for the next campaign, and that enough militia could be added to this continental force to make it capable of taking on any operations against the British posts within the United States.

Assurances were also given that ample supplies of provisions for the combined armies should be laid up in magazines under the direction of congress. The French minister addressed congress on this subject about the time that General Washington expressed so strongly, the necessity of knowing with certainty, on what reinforcements he was to calculate.

Assurances were also given that enough supplies for the combined armies would be stored in warehouses under the direction of Congress. The French minister spoke to Congress about this around the same time that General Washington emphasized the importance of knowing for sure what reinforcements he could rely on.

Thus pressed by their general and their ally, congress renewed their urgent requisitions on the states, and desired the several governments to correspond weekly with the committee at head quarters, on the progress made in complying with them.

Thus pressed by their general and their ally, Congress renewed their urgent requests to the states and asked the various governments to communicate weekly with the committee at headquarters about the progress made in meeting them.

In the mean time, General Washington meditated unceasingly on the course to be pursued in the various contingencies which might happen; and endeavoured to prepare for any plan of operations which circumstances might render adviseable. The arrival of Sir Henry Clinton diminished the variety of aspects in which the relative situation of the two armies was to be contemplated, and rendered the success of an attempt on New York more doubtful. It was now thought adviseable that the armament from France, instead of sailing directly to[Pg 240] the Hook, should proceed in the first instance to Rhode Island; where, after disembarking the troops, and providing for the sick, it might wait until a definitive plan of operations should be concerted.

In the meantime, General Washington constantly thought about the actions to take in the various situations that could arise, and he worked to prepare for any operational plans that circumstances might suggest. The arrival of Sir Henry Clinton reduced the different ways to view the relative positions of the two armies and made any attempt on New York seem less likely to succeed. It was now deemed wise for the fleet from France, instead of heading straight to[Pg 240] the Hook, to first go to Rhode Island; there, after landing the troops and taking care of the sick, it could wait until a clear plan of action was agreed upon.

July 13.
Arrival of a French armament in Rhode Island.

On the 13th of July, while the result of the measures adopted by the several states remained uncertain, the French fleet entered the harbour of Newport, and letters were soon afterwards received from the Count de Rochambeau and the Chevalier Tunay, the officers commanding the land and naval forces, transmitting to General Washington an account of their arrival, of their strength, their expectations, and their orders.

On July 13th, while the results of the measures taken by the various states were still unclear, the French fleet arrived in the harbor of Newport. Shortly after, letters came in from Count de Rochambeau and Chevalier Tunay, the officers in charge of the land and naval forces, giving General Washington details about their arrival, their strength, their expectations, and their orders.

The troops designed to serve in the United States had assembled, early in the year, at Brest; but the transports at that place having been chiefly employed for an armament destined for the West Indies; and the ports from which it had been intended to draw others, being blockaded, only the first division, consisting of five thousand men, had arrived at Newport; but letters from France contained assurances that the second division of the army might soon be expected.

The troops set to serve in the United States had gathered early in the year at Brest; however, the transports there were mainly used for a military operation intended for the West Indies, and the ports meant for sending additional troops were blockaded. As a result, only the first division, made up of five thousand men, had reached Newport. Nonetheless, letters from France promised that the second division of the army could be expected soon.

To obviate those difficulties which had occurred on former occasions respecting rank, the orders given to Lieutenant General Count de Rochambeau, which were inclosed in his first letter, placed him entirely under the command of General Washington. The French troops[Pg 241] were to be considered as auxiliaries, and were, according to the usages of war, to cede the post of honour to the Americans.[41]

To avoid the issues that had happened before regarding rank, the orders given to Lieutenant General Count de Rochambeau, which were included in his first letter, placed him completely under General Washington's command. The French troops[Pg 241] were to be regarded as support and, according to the customs of war, were to give the position of honor to the Americans.[41]

Convinced that cordial harmony between the allied forces was essential to their success, both generals cultivated carefully the friendly dispositions felt by the troops towards each other. Warm professions of reciprocal respect, esteem, and confidence, were interchanged between them; and each endeavoured to impress on the other, and on all the military and civil departments, the conviction that the two nations, and two armies, were united by the ties of interest and affection. On this occasion, General Washington recommended to his officers, as a symbol of friendship and affection for their allies, to engraft on the American cockade, which was black, a white relief, that being the colour of the French cockade.

Convinced that a friendly relationship between the allied forces was crucial for their success, both generals carefully nurtured the goodwill felt by the troops toward one another. They exchanged warm expressions of mutual respect, esteem, and trust; each sought to impress upon the other, as well as all military and civilian departments, the belief that the two nations and their armies were connected by shared interests and camaraderie. On this occasion, General Washington advised his officers to symbolize their friendship and affection for their allies by adding a white stripe to the American cockade, which was black, as a nod to the color of the French cockade.

Late as was the arrival of the French troops, they found the Americans unprepared for active and offensive operations. Not even at that time were the numbers ascertained which would be furnished by the states. Yet it was necessary for General Washington to communicate a plan of the campaign to the Count de Rochambeau.

Late as the French troops arrived, they found the Americans unprepared for active and offensive operations. Even then, the numbers that the states would provide had not been confirmed. Still, it was essential for General Washington to share a campaign plan with Count de Rochambeau.

The season was already so far advanced that preparations for the operations contemplated eventually, on the arrival of the second division[Pg 242] of the French fleet, must be immediately made, or there would not be time, though every circumstance should prove favourable, to execute the design against New York. Such a state of things so ill comported with the engagements of congress, and with the interests of the nation, that, trusting to his being enabled, by the measures already taken by the states, to comply with what was incumbent on him to perform, he determined to hazard much rather than forego the advantages to be derived from the aids afforded by France. In communicating this resolution to congress, he said—"Pressed on all sides by a choice of difficulties in a moment which required decision, I have adopted that line of conduct which comported with the dignity and faith of congress, the reputation of these states, and the honour of our arms. I have sent on definitive proposals of co-operation to the French general and admiral. Neither the period of the season, nor a regard to decency, would permit delay. The die is cast, and it remains with the states either to fulfil their engagements, preserve their credit, and support their independence, or to involve us in disgrace and defeat. Notwithstanding the failures pointed out by the committee, I shall proceed on the supposition that they will, ultimately, consult their own interest and honour and not suffer us to fail for the want of means which it is evidently in their power to afford. What has been done, and is doing, by[Pg 243] some of the states, confirms the opinion I have entertained of sufficient resources in the country. Of the disposition of the people to submit to any arrangement for bringing them forth, I see no reasonable ground to doubt. If we fail for want of proper exertions in any of the governments, I trust the responsibility will fall where it ought; and that I shall stand justified to congress, my country, and the world."

The season was already so far along that preparations for the operations planned for when the second division of the French fleet arrived had to be made immediately, or there wouldn't be enough time, even if everything worked out in our favor, to carry out the plan against New York. This situation clashed badly with Congress's commitments and the nation's interests, so relying on the measures already taken by the states to fulfill his responsibilities, he decided to take risks rather than give up the benefits that would come from France's support. In sharing this decision with Congress, he said—"Faced with a bunch of difficult choices at a time that required decisive action, I chose a course that aligned with the dignity and integrity of Congress, the reputation of these states, and the honor of our military. I have sent definitive proposals for cooperation to the French general and admiral. Neither the timing of the season nor a regard for propriety allows for any delays. The die is cast, and it’s up to the states to either meet their commitments, maintain their reputation, and support their independence, or to drag us into disgrace and defeat. Despite the setbacks highlighted by the committee, I will move forward on the assumption that they will ultimately act in their own interest and honor and won’t let us fail due to a lack of resources that they clearly have the ability to provide. What some of the states have done and are doing confirms my belief in the adequate resources available in the country. I have no reasonable doubts about the willingness of the people to agree to any arrangements necessary to bring these resources forth. If we fail due to insufficient efforts from any of the governments, I trust the accountability will fall where it should; and that I will stand justified to Congress, my country, and the world."

 

Robinson Mansion

Robinson Mansion

 Beverly Robinson Mansion at West Point

Beverly Robinson Mansion at West Point

Benedict Arnold made this house his headquarters while in command of the fort and garrison there. It was here that Washington came to breakfast with Arnold, one September morning in 1780 and made the discovery that his host had turned traitor and was conspiring to surrender West Point to the British.

Benedict Arnold used this house as his headquarters while he was in charge of the fort and garrison there. It was here that Washington came to have breakfast with Arnold one September morning in 1780 and discovered that his host had become a traitor and was plotting to hand over West Point to the British.

 

A decisive naval superiority, however, was considered as the basis of any enterprise to be undertaken by the allied arms. This naval superiority being assumed, the outlines of the plan were drawn, and the 5th of August was named as the day on which the French troops should re-embark, and the American army assemble at Morrissania.

A decisive naval advantage, however, was viewed as the foundation for any operations to be carried out by the allied forces. Assuming this naval advantage, the main points of the plan were outlined, and August 5th was set as the day for the French troops to re-embark and the American army to gather at Morrissania.

This plan was committed to Major General the Marquis de la Fayette, who was authorized to explain the situation of the American army, and the views of the General, to the Count de Rochambeau. It was to be considered as preliminary to any operation—that the fleet and army of France should continue their aid until the enterprise should succeed, or be abandoned by mutual consent.

This plan was handed over to Major General the Marquis de la Fayette, who was authorized to explain the situation of the American army and the General's plans to Count de Rochambeau. It was to be seen as a first step before any action—that the French fleet and army would keep providing support until the mission either succeeded or was dropped by mutual agreement.

The Chevalier de Tunay did not long maintain his superiority at sea. Three days after he reached Newport, Admiral Greaves arrived with six ships of the line, and transferred it to the British. On his appearance off the Hook, Ar[Pg 244]buthnot passed the bar with four ships of the line; and hearing that De Tunay had reached Rhode Island, proceeded thither, and cruised off the harbour. The Count de Rochambeau had been put into possession of all the forts and batteries about Newport, and the fleet had been moved in a line so as to co-operate with the land forces. This position appearing too formidable to be attempted by the fleet alone, Arbuthnot continued to cruise off Block Island.

The Chevalier de Tunay didn't keep his advantage at sea for long. Three days after he got to Newport, Admiral Greaves showed up with six ships of the line and took it back for the British. When he appeared off the Hook, Arbuthnot crossed the bar with four ships of the line. Upon hearing that De Tunay had arrived in Rhode Island, he headed there and cruised off the harbor. The Count de Rochambeau was given control of all the forts and batteries around Newport, and the fleet was arranged in a line to work with the ground forces. This setup seemed too strong for just the fleet to take on, so Arbuthnot kept cruising off Block Island.

As the commanders of the allied forces still cherished the hope of acquiring a superiority at sea, the design on New York was only suspended. This hope was strengthened by intelligence that the Count de Guichen had been joined in the West Indies by a powerful Spanish armament. The Chevalier de Tunay had despatched a packet to inform him that he was blocked up by a superior force, and to solicit such reinforcements as the situation of the Count might enable him to spare. Relying on the success of this application, and on the arrival of the second division of the squadron from Brest, the American general impatiently expected the moment when De Tunay would be enabled to act offensively.

As the leaders of the allied forces still held onto the hope of gaining an advantage at sea, the plan for New York was just put on hold. This hope grew stronger with news that Count de Guichen had been joined in the West Indies by a strong Spanish fleet. The Chevalier de Tunay had sent a message to inform him that he was trapped by a stronger force and to request any reinforcements that the Count could spare. Counting on the success of this request and the arrival of the second division of the squadron from Brest, the American general eagerly awaited the moment when De Tunay would be able to take offensive action.

In this crisis of affairs, a derangement took place in a most important department, which threatened to disconcert the whole plan of operations, though every other circumstance should prove favourable.[Pg 245]

In this crisis, a major disruption occurred in a critical department, which risked throwing off the entire plan of operations, even if all other factors were favorable.[Pg 245]

The immense expenditure of the quartermaster's department—the inadequacy of the funds with which it was supplied—the reciprocal disgusts and complaints produced by these causes, had determined congress to make still another radical change in the system. This subject had been taken up early in the winter; but such were the delays inseparable from the proceedings of the government, that the report of the committee was not made until the month of March, nor finally decided on until the middle of July.

The huge spending by the quartermaster's department—the lack of funds it received—the mutual frustration and complaints caused by these issues—had led Congress to consider another major change in the system. This topic was addressed early in the winter; however, due to the unavoidable delays in government processes, the committee's report wasn't submitted until March and wasn't finalized until mid-July.

This subject was too interesting to the army, and to the important operations meditated for the campaign, not to engage the anxious attention of the Commander-in-chief. At his request, the quartermaster general, while the army lay in winter quarters, repaired to Philadelphia for the purpose of giving congress all the information he possessed. He proposed to withdraw the management of the department almost entirely from the civil government, and to place it under the control of the person who should be at its head, subject only to the direction of the Commander-in-chief.

This topic was too interesting for the army and the significant plans being considered for the campaign to not capture the Commander-in-chief's attention. At his request, the quartermaster general, while the army was in winter quarters, went to Philadelphia to provide Congress with all the information he had. He suggested taking almost complete control of the department away from the civil government and placing it under the authority of the individual leading it, while still being accountable to the Commander-in-chief.

The views of congress were entirely different. While the subject remained suspended before that body, it was taken up by the committee of co-operation at head quarters, where the combined experience and talents of Generals Washington, Schuyler, and Greene, were employed in digesting a system adapted to the actual situa[Pg 246]tion of the United States, which was recommended to congress. To give the more weight to his opinion by showing its disinterestedness, General Greene offered to continue in the discharge of the duties assigned to him, without any other extra emolument than his family expenses. This plan, whatever might have been its details, was, in its general outlines, unacceptable to congress. A system was, at length, completed by that body, which General Greene believed to be incapable of execution. Resolving not to take upon himself the responsibility of measures the issue of which must be calamitous and disgraceful, he determined to withdraw from a station in which he despaired of being useful.

The views of Congress were completely different. While the issue was still pending before them, the committee of cooperation at headquarters took it up, utilizing the combined experience and skills of Generals Washington, Schuyler, and Greene to develop a system suited to the current situation of the United States, which was then recommended to Congress. To strengthen the credibility of his opinion by demonstrating his selflessness, General Greene offered to continue performing his duties without any additional pay beyond covering his family's expenses. This plan, whatever its specifics, was, in general terms, unacceptable to Congress. Eventually, a system was finalized by that body, which General Greene believed was impossible to carry out. Deciding not to shoulder the responsibility for actions that he felt would lead to disastrous and shameful results, he chose to step down from a position where he saw no hope of being effective.

Apprehending the worst consequences from his resignation in so critical a moment, General Washington pressed him to suspend this decisive step, until the effect of an application from himself and from the committee of co-operation should be known. Their representations produced no effect. The resolution to make this bold experiment was unalterable. General Greene's resignation was accepted; and the letter conveying it excited so much irritation, that a design was intimated of suspending his command in the line of the army. But these impressions soon wore off, and the resentment of the moment subsided. Colonel Pickering, who succeeded General Greene, possessed, in an eminent degree, those qualities which fitted him to com[Pg 247]bat and subdue the difficulties of his department. To great energy of mind and body, he added a long experience in the affairs of the continent, with an ardent zeal for its interests; and General Greene himself, with several of the former officers, at the request of the Commander-in-chief, continued for some time after their resignation, to render all the services in their power; but there was a defect of means, for which neither talents nor exertion could compensate.

Realizing the potential worst outcomes of his resignation at such a critical time, General Washington urged him to hold off on this major decision until they could see the impact of a request from him and the cooperation committee. However, their appeals had no effect. The decision to proceed with this bold move was final. General Greene’s resignation was accepted, and the letter announcing it caused so much anger that there was talk of suspending his command in the army. Fortunately, those feelings quickly faded, and the immediate resentment calmed down. Colonel Pickering, who took over from General Greene, had exceptional qualities that equipped him to tackle and overcome the challenges in his role. He combined great mental and physical energy with extensive experience in national matters and a passionate commitment to its interests. General Greene and several other former officers, at the Commander-in-chief’s request, continued to offer their assistance for some time after resigning, but there was a lack of resources that neither skill nor effort could make up for.

In the commissary department the same distress was experienced. General Washington was driven to the necessity of emptying the magazines at West Point, and of foraging on a people whose means of subsisting themselves were already nearly exhausted by the armies on both sides. The inadequate supplies drawn from these sources afforded but a short relief; and, once more, at a time when the public imagination was contemplating brilliant plans, the execution of which required steady courage with persevering labour, and consequently ample magazines, the army was frequently reduced to the last extremity by the want of food.

In the supply department, the same struggle was felt. General Washington had to empty the stores at West Point and scavenge from a population whose resources were nearly depleted by the armies on both sides. The insufficient supplies from these sources offered only temporary relief; and, once again, when the public was dreaming of grand plans that needed steady courage, hard work, and sufficient supplies, the army often faced severe shortages of food.

So great were the embarrassments produced by the difficulty of procuring subsistence that, although the second division of the fleet from Brest was daily expected, General Washington found it necessary to countermand the orders under which the militia were marching to camp.[Pg 248]

The challenges of getting enough food were so significant that, even though the second division of the fleet from Brest was expected any day, General Washington had to cancel the orders that were sending the militia to camp.[Pg 248]

Such was the state of preparation for the campaign, when intelligence was brought by the Alliance frigate that the port of Brest was blockaded. In the hope, however, that the combined fleets of France and Spain would be able to raise the blockade, General Washington adhered steadily to his purpose respecting New York, and continued his exertions to provide the means for its execution. The details of the plan of co-operation continued to be the subject of a correspondence with the Count de Rochambeau, and the Chevalier de Tunay; and, at length, a personal interview was agreed upon, to take place on the 21st of September, at Hartford, in Connecticut.

The campaign preparations were underway when news came from the Alliance frigate that the port of Brest was blocked. However, General Washington remained focused on his plans for New York, hoping that the combined fleets of France and Spain would successfully lift the blockade, and he kept working to ensure its success. The specifics of the cooperation plan were discussed in ongoing correspondence with Count de Rochambeau and Chevalier de Tunay, and eventually, they agreed to meet in person on September 21st in Hartford, Connecticut.

Enterprise against New York relinquished.

In this interview, ulterior eventual measures, as well as an explicit and detailed arrangement for acting against New York, were the subjects of consideration. No one of the plans, however, then concerted for the present campaign, was carried into execution. All, except an invasion of Canada, depended on a superiority at sea, which was soon rendered almost hopeless by certain information that the Count de Guichen had sailed for Europe.

In this interview, future actions and a clear, detailed plan for taking action against New York were discussed. However, none of the plans made for the current campaign were put into action. All of them, except for an invasion of Canada, relied on having an advantage at sea, which was quickly made nearly impossible by news that Count de Guichen had set sail for Europe.

Naval superiority of the British.

Not long after receiving this information, Admiral Rodney arrived at New York with eleven ships of the line and four frigates. This reinforcement not only disconcerted all the plans of the allies, but put it in the power of the Brit[Pg 249]ish to prosecute in security their designs in the south.

Not long after getting this news, Admiral Rodney arrived in New York with eleven battleships and four frigates. This reinforcement not only threw the allies' plans into disarray, but also gave the British the ability to carry out their southern strategies securely.

Plans for the campaign abandoned.

It may well be supposed that the Commander-in-chief did not relinquish, without infinite chagrin, the sanguine expectations he had formed of rendering this summer decisive of the war. Never before had he indulged so strongly the hope of happily terminating the contest. In a letter to an intimate friend, this chagrin was thus expressed. "We are now drawing to a close an inactive campaign, the beginning of which appeared pregnant with events of a very favourable complexion. I hoped, but I hoped in vain, that a prospect was opening which would enable me to fix a period to my military pursuits, and restore me to domestic life. The favourable disposition of Spain, the promised succour from France, the combined force in the West Indies, the declaration of Russia, (acceded to by other powers of Europe, humiliating the naval pride and power of Great Britain) the superiority of France and Spain by sea in Europe, the Irish claims and English disturbances, formed in the aggregate an opinion in my breast, (which is not very susceptible of peaceful dreams) that the hour of deliverance was not far distant; for that, however unwilling Great Britain might be to yield the point, it would not be in her power to continue the contest. But alas! these prospects, flattering as they were, have proved delusive; and I see nothing before us but accumulating dis[Pg 250]tress. We have been half of our time without provisions, and are likely to continue so. We have no magazines, nor money to form them. We have lived upon expedients until we can live no longer. In a word, the history of the war is a history of false hopes and temporary devices, instead of system and economy. It is in vain, however, to look back, nor is it our business to do so. Our case is not desperate, if virtue exists in the people, and there is wisdom among our rulers. But to suppose that this great revolution can be accomplished by a temporary army; that this army will be subsisted by state supplies; and that taxation alone is adequate to our wants, is in my opinion absurd, and as unreasonable as to expect an inversion of the order of nature to accommodate itself to our views. If it were necessary, it could be easily proved to any person of a moderate understanding, that an annual army, or any army raised on the spur of the occasion, besides being unqualified for the end designed, is, in various ways that could be enumerated, ten times more expensive than a permanent body of men under good organization and military discipline; which never was, nor will be the case with raw troops. A thousand arguments, resulting from experience and the nature of things, might also be adduced to prove that the army, if it is to depend upon state supplies, must disband or starve, and that taxation alone (especially at this late hour) can not fur[Pg 251]nish the means to carry on the war. Is it not time to retract from error, and benefit by experience? Or do we want farther proof of the ruinous system we have pertinaciously adhered to."

It’s clear that the Commander-in-chief didn’t let go of his strong hopes for making this summer a turning point in the war without a lot of frustration. He had never been so optimistic about ending the conflict successfully. In a letter to a close friend, he expressed this frustration. “We are now wrapping up a stagnant campaign, the start of which seemed full of promising events. I hoped, but I hoped in vain, that a path was opening up that would allow me to end my military efforts and return to my home life. The supportive stance of Spain, the promised help from France, the combined forces in the West Indies, Russia's declaration (joined by other European powers, humiliating Britain’s naval pride and power), the superiority of France and Spain at sea in Europe, the Irish claims, and the disturbances in England all led me to believe that the moment of relief was near; for, no matter how unwilling Britain was to back down, it wouldn’t be able to sustain the fight. But alas! those hopes, as enticing as they were, have turned out to be misleading; and I see nothing ahead but growing distress. We’ve spent half our time without food, and it looks like that will continue. We have no supplies or money to create them. We’ve relied on makeshift solutions until we can no longer do so. In short, the story of the war is one of false hopes and temporary fixes instead of strategy and efficient management. However, it’s pointless to dwell on the past, nor is it our responsibility to do so. Our situation isn’t hopeless if the people have virtue and our leaders have wisdom. But to believe that this massive revolution can be achieved by a temporary army; that this army will be supported by state supplies; and that taxation alone is enough to meet our needs is, in my view, unreasonable—just as unreasonable as expecting a reversal of the natural order to suit our desires. If needed, it could be easily demonstrated to someone of average understanding that an annual army, or any army put together in a hurry, besides being ill-suited for its intended purpose, is in many ways that could be listed, ten times more expensive than a well-organized, professionally disciplined permanent force; which has never been, and likely never will be, the case with inexperienced troops. A thousand arguments, drawn from experience and reality, could also be made to show that an army relying on state supplies is bound to either disband or starve and that taxation alone (especially at this late stage) cannot provide the means to continue the war. Isn’t it time to acknowledge our mistakes and learn from experience? Or do we need more proof of the damaging system we’ve stubbornly stuck to?”


CHAPTER VIII.

Treason and escape of Arnold.... Trial and execution of Major André.... Precautions for the security of West Point.... Letter of General Washington on American affairs.... Proceedings of congress respecting the army.... Major Talmadge destroys the British stores at Coram.... The army retires into winter quarters.... Irruption of Major Carlton into New York.... European transactions.

Treason and escape of Arnold.... Trial and execution of Major André.... Measures for securing West Point.... Letter from General Washington about American issues.... Congress actions regarding the army.... Major Talmadge destroys the British supplies at Coram.... The army goes into winter quarters.... Major Carlton's incursion into New York.... European events.

 

1780.

While the public mind was anticipating great events from the combined arms of France and America, treason lay concealed in the American camp, and was plotting the ruin of the American cause.

While people were eagerly expecting significant developments from the united forces of France and America, betrayal was hidden within the American camp, scheming against the American cause.

The great services and military talents of General Arnold, his courage in battle, and patient fortitude under excessive hardships, had secured to him a high place in the opinion of the army and of his country.

The significant contributions and military skills of General Arnold, his bravery in combat, and his ability to endure extreme hardships had earned him a respected position in the eyes of the army and his country.

Not having sufficiently recovered from the wounds received before Quebec and at Saratoga to be fit for active service, and having large accounts to settle with the government which required leisure, he was, on the evacuation of Philadelphia in 1778, appointed to the command in that place.

Not having fully recovered from the injuries he sustained before Quebec and at Saratoga to be ready for active duty, and needing time to deal with significant matters related to the government, he was appointed to command in Philadelphia after its evacuation in 1778.

Unfortunately, that strength of principle and correctness of judgment, which might enable him to resist the various seductions to which his fame and rank exposed him in the metropolis of the[Pg 253] Union, were not associated with the firmness which he had displayed in the field, and in the most adverse circumstances. Yielding to the temptations of a false pride, and forgetting that he did not possess the resources of private fortune, he indulged in the pleasures of a sumptuous table and expensive equipage, and soon swelled his debts to an amount which it was impossible to discharge. Unmindful of his military character, he engaged in speculations which were unfortunate; and with the hope of immense profit, took shares in privateers which were unsuccessful. His claims against the United States were great, and he looked to them for the means of extricating himself from the embarrassments in which his indiscretions had involved him; but the commissioners to whom his accounts were referred for settlement, had reduced them considerably; and, on his appeal from their decision to congress, a committee reported that the sum allowed by the commissioners was more than he was entitled to receive.

Sadly, the strong principles and good judgment that could have helped him resist the various temptations that his fame and status exposed him to in the bustling capital of the[Pg 253] Union, were not matched by the determination he had shown on the battlefield, even in the toughest situations. Giving in to the allure of false pride and forgetting that he didn't have a private fortune, he indulged in lavish dining and extravagant carriages, quickly accumulating debts that became impossible to pay off. Ignoring his military reputation, he got involved in risky ventures that didn’t pan out; with dreams of huge gains, he invested in privateers that ultimately failed. He had significant claims against the United States and hoped to use them to escape the mess caused by his poor choices, but the commissioners assigned to settle his accounts reduced those claims significantly. When he appealed their decision to Congress, a committee reported that the amount approved by the commissioners was more than he was actually entitled to receive.

He was charged with various acts of extortion on the citizens of Philadelphia, and with peculating on the funds of the continent. Not the less soured by these multiplied causes of irritation, from the reflection that they were attributable to his own follies and vices, he gave full scope to his resentments, and indulged himself in expressions of angry reproach against, what he termed, the ingratitude of his country, which pro[Pg 254]voked those around him, and gave great offence to congress. Having become peculiarly odious to the government of Pennsylvania, the Executive of that state exhibited formal charges against him to congress, who directed that he should be arrested and brought before a court martial. His trial was concluded late in January, 1779, and he was sentenced to be reprimanded by the Commander-in-chief. This sentence was approved by congress and carried into execution.

He was accused of various acts of extortion against the citizens of Philadelphia and misusing the continent's funds. Despite his multiple sources of irritation, stemming from the realization that they were due to his own mistakes and vices, he fully expressed his anger and allowed himself to make accusations of what he called the ingratitude of his country, which upset those around him and greatly offended Congress. Having become particularly disliked by the Pennsylvania government, the state's Executive brought formal charges against him to Congress, which ordered his arrest and that he be brought before a court martial. His trial wrapped up in late January 1779, and he was sentenced to receive a reprimand from the Commander-in-chief. Congress approved this sentence, and it was carried out.

From the time the sentence against him was approved, if not sooner, his proud unprincipled spirit revolted from the cause of his country, and determined him to seek an occasion to make the objects of his resentment, the victims of his vengeance. Turning his eyes on West Point as an acquisition which would give value to treason, and inflict a mortal wound on his former friends, he sought the command of that fortress for the purpose of gratifying both his avarice and his hate.[42]

From the moment his sentence was passed, if not before, his arrogant and unscrupulous nature turned against his country, leading him to look for a chance to make those he resented suffer. He set his sights on West Point, seeing it as a prize that would make his betrayal worthwhile and deal a serious blow to his former allies. He aimed to command that fortress to satisfy both his greed and his hatred.[42]

To New York, the safety of West Point was peculiarly interesting; and, in that state, the reputation of Arnold was particularly high. To its delegation he addressed himself; and one of[Pg 255] its members had written a letter to General Washington, suggesting doubts respecting the military character of Howe, to whom its defence was then entrusted, and recommending Arnold for that service. This request was not forgotten. Some short time afterwards, General Schuyler mentioned to the Commander-in-chief a letter he had received from Arnold intimating his wish to join the army, but stating his inability, in consequence of his wounds, to perform the active duties of the field. General Washington observed that, as there was a prospect of a vigorous campaign, he should be gratified with the aid of General Arnold. That so soon as the operations against New York should commence, he designed to draw his whole force into the field, leaving even West Point to the care of invalids and a small garrison of militia. Recollecting however the former application of a member of congress respecting this post, he added, that "if, with this previous information, that situation would be more agreeable to him than a command in the field, his wishes should certainly be indulged."

To New York, the safety of West Point was particularly interesting; and in that state, Arnold had a great reputation. He reached out to its delegation, and one of[Pg 255] the members had written a letter to General Washington, expressing doubts about the military reputation of Howe, who was then responsible for its defense, and recommending Arnold for that role. This request was remembered. Shortly after, General Schuyler informed the Commander-in-chief about a letter he had received from Arnold indicating his desire to join the army, but stating he couldn’t perform active field duties due to his injuries. General Washington noted that, with a vigorous campaign on the horizon, he would appreciate the assistance of General Arnold. He planned to deploy his full force into the field as soon as operations against New York began, leaving even West Point under the watch of invalids and a small militia garrison. However, remembering the earlier request from a congress member about this post, he added that "if, with this prior information, that position would be more suitable for him than a command in the field, his wishes would definitely be accommodated."

This conversation being communicated to Arnold, he caught eagerly at the proposition, though without openly discovering any solicitude on the subject; and, in the beginning of August, repaired to camp, where he renewed the solicitations which had before been made indirectly.[Pg 256]

This conversation reaching Arnold, he eagerly seized the suggestion, though he didn’t show any concern about it openly; and at the beginning of August, he went to the camp, where he resumed the requests that had been made indirectly before.[Pg 256]

At this juncture, Sir Henry Clinton embarked on an expedition he meditated against Rhode Island, and General Washington was advancing on New York. He offered Arnold the left wing of the army, which that officer declined under the pretexts mentioned in his letter to General Schuyler.

At this point, Sir Henry Clinton began a mission he was planning against Rhode Island, while General Washington was moving toward New York. He offered Arnold the left flank of the army, but that officer refused for the reasons he stated in his letter to General Schuyler.

Incapable of suspecting a man who had given such distinguished proofs of courage and patriotism, the Commander-in-chief was neither alarmed at his refusal to embrace so splendid an opportunity of recovering the favour of his countrymen, nor at the embarrassment accompanying that refusal. Pressing the subject no farther, he assented to the request which had been made, and invested Arnold with the command of West Point. Previous to his soliciting this station, he had, in a letter to Colonel Robinson, signified his change of principles, and his wish to restore himself to the favour of his Prince by some signal proof of his repentance. This letter opened the way to a correspondence with Sir Henry Clinton, the immediate object of which, after obtaining the appointment he had solicited, was to concert the means of delivering the important post he commanded to the British general.

Unable to suspect a man who had shown such remarkable proof of courage and patriotism, the Commander-in-chief was not worried about his refusal to take such an excellent opportunity to win back the favor of his fellow countrymen, nor was he concerned about the discomfort that came with that refusal. Without pressing the issue further, he agreed to the request that had been made and put Arnold in charge of West Point. Before asking for this position, he had expressed his change of heart in a letter to Colonel Robinson, indicating his desire to regain the favor of his Prince through some significant act of repentance. This letter opened the door to communication with Sir Henry Clinton, whose main goal, after securing the position he wanted, was to plan how to hand over the important post he commanded to the British general.

Major John André, an aid-de-camp of Sir Henry Clinton, and adjutant general of the British army, was selected as the person to whom the maturing of Arnold's treason, and the ar[Pg 257]rangements for its execution should be entrusted. A correspondence was carried on between them under a mercantile disguise, in the feigned names of Gustavus and Anderson; and, at length, to facilitate their communications, the Vulture sloop of war moved up the North River, and took a station convenient for the purpose, but not so near as to excite suspicion.

Major John André, an aide-de-camp to Sir Henry Clinton and adjutant general of the British army, was chosen as the person responsible for overseeing Arnold's treason and the plans for its execution. They communicated under a business disguise, using the fake names Gustavus and Anderson. Eventually, to make their communications easier, the Vulture sloop of war moved up the North River and took a position that was convenient for their needs, but not so close as to raise suspicion.

Treason and escape of Arnold.

The time when General Washington met the Count de Rochambeau at Hartford was selected for the final adjustment of the plan; and, as a personal interview was deemed necessary, Major André came up the river, and went on board the Vulture. The house of a Mr. Smith, without the American posts, was appointed for the interview; and to that place both parties repaired in the night—André being brought under a pass for John Anderson, in a boat despatched from the shore. While the conference was yet unfinished, day light approached; and, to avoid discovery, Arnold proposed that André should remain concealed until the succeeding night. He is understood to have refused peremptorily to be carried within the American posts; but the promise to respect this objection was not observed. They continued together the succeeding day; and when, in the following night, his return to the Vulture was proposed, the boatmen refused to carry him because she had shifted her station during the day, in consequence of a gun which was moved to the shore without the knowledge[Pg 258] of Arnold, and brought to bear upon her. This embarrassing circumstance reduced him to the necessity of endeavouring to reach New York by land. To accomplish this purpose, he reluctantly yielded to the urgent representations of Arnold; and, laying aside his regimentals, which he had hitherto worn under a surtout, put on a plain suit of clothes, and received a pass from General Arnold, authorizing him, under the name of John Anderson, to proceed on the public service to the White Plains, or lower if he thought proper.

The time when General Washington met Count de Rochambeau in Hartford was chosen for the final planning. Since a face-to-face meeting was necessary, Major André traveled up the river and went on board the Vulture. The house of a Mr. Smith, outside the American posts, was designated for the meeting, and both parties arrived there at night—André was brought in under a pass as John Anderson, in a boat sent from the shore. While they were still talking, dawn approached; and to avoid being discovered, Arnold suggested that André should stay hidden until the next night. He is understood to have firmly refused to be taken inside the American posts, but this promise was not kept. They stayed together the following day, and when his return to the Vulture was suggested that night, the boatmen refused to take him because the ship had changed her location during the day, due to a cannon being moved to the shore without Arnold's knowledge, and it was aimed at her. This tricky situation forced him to try to reach New York by land. To achieve this, he reluctantly agreed to Arnold’s persistent requests; and, taking off his uniform, which he had been wearing under a coat, he put on a plain outfit and received a pass from General Arnold, allowing him, under the name John Anderson, to go on public business to the White Plains, or further if he chose.

With this permit, he had passed all the guards and posts on the road unsuspected, and was proceeding to New York in perfect security, when one of three militia men who were employed between the lines of the two armies, springing suddenly from his covert into the road, seized the reins of his bridle, and stopped his horse. Losing his accustomed self-possession, Major André, instead of producing the pass[43] from General Arnold, asked the man hastily where he belonged? He replied "to below;" a term implying that he was from New York. "And so," said André, not suspecting deception, "am I." He then declared himself to be a British officer on urgent business, and begged that he might not be detained. The ap[Pg 259]pearance of the other militia men disclosed his mistake, too late to correct it. He offered a purse of gold, and a valuable watch, with tempting promises of ample reward from his government, if they would permit him to escape; but his offers were rejected, and his captors proceeded to search him. They found concealed in his boots, in Arnold's hand writing, papers containing all the information which could be important respecting West Point. When carried before Lieutenant Colonel Jameson, the officer commanding the scouting parties on the lines, he still maintained his assumed character, and requested Jameson to inform his commanding officer that Anderson was taken. Jameson despatched an express with this communication. On receiving it, Arnold comprehended the full extent of his danger, and, flying from well merited punishment, took refuge on board the Vulture.

With this permit, he had passed all the guards and checkpoints on the road without being noticed and was heading to New York safely when one of three militia men stationed between the two armies suddenly jumped out from hiding, grabbed the reins of his horse, and stopped him. Major André, losing his usual composure, instead of showing the pass[43] from General Arnold, quickly asked the man where he was from. He replied, "from below," which meant he was from New York. "And so am I," André said, not realizing he was being deceived. He then claimed he was a British officer on urgent business and pleaded not to be held up. The presence of the other militia men revealed his mistake too late for him to fix it. He offered them a purse of gold and a valuable watch, along with promises of generous rewards from his government if they would let him go. However, his offers were turned down, and they began to search him. They found papers hidden in his boots, in Arnold's handwriting, that contained crucial information about West Point. When he was brought before Lieutenant Colonel Jameson, the officer in charge of the scouting parties, he still kept up his pretense and asked Jameson to inform his commanding officer that Anderson had been captured. Jameson sent a message with this information. Upon receiving it, Arnold realized the full extent of his danger and, fleeing from well-deserved punishment, sought refuge on board the Vulture.

 

Tappan house

Tappan house

 Where Washington Stayed During André's Trial

Where Washington Stayed During André's Trial

In this brick house at Tappan, Rockland County, New York, the American Commander-in-Chief, during September, 1780, awaited the result of the trial of Major John André, who conspired with Benedict Arnold for the betrayal of West Point to the British. Fourteen American officers sat in judgment on André and ordered his execution on October 2, 1780. In Tappan also is still standing the old Tavern where André was imprisoned.

In this brick house in Tappan, Rockland County, New York, the American Commander-in-Chief awaited the outcome of the trial of Major John André, who colluded with Benedict Arnold to betray West Point to the British. Fourteen American officers judged André and sentenced him to execution on October 2, 1780. The old tavern where André was held is still standing in Tappan.

 

When sufficient time for the escape of Arnold was supposed to have elapsed, André, no longer affecting concealment, acknowledged himself to be the adjutant general of the British army. Jameson, seeking to correct the mischief of his indiscreet communication to Arnold, immediately despatched a packet to the Commander-in-chief containing the papers which had been discovered, with a letter from André, relating the manner of his capture, and accounting for the disguise he had assumed.[Pg 260]

When enough time was thought to have passed for Arnold to escape, André, no longer trying to hide, admitted that he was the adjutant general of the British army. Jameson, wanting to fix the trouble caused by his careless message to Arnold, quickly sent a package to the Commander-in-chief that included the discovered papers, along with a letter from André explaining how he was captured and justifying the disguise he was wearing.[Pg 260]

The express was directed to meet the Commander-in-chief, who was then on his return from Hartford; but, taking different roads,[44] they missed each other, and a delay attended the delivery of the papers, which insured the escape of Arnold.

The express was supposed to meet the Commander-in-Chief, who was on his way back from Hartford; however, since they took different routes,[44] they missed each other, causing a delay in delivering the papers, which allowed Arnold to escape.

Precautions for the security of West Point.

Every precaution was immediately taken for the security of West Point; after which, the attention of the Commander-in-chief was turned to André. A board of general officers, of which Major General Greene was president, and the two foreign generals, Lafayette and Steuben, were members, was called, to report a precise state of his case, and to determine the character in which he was to be considered, and the punishment to which he was liable.

Every precaution was quickly taken to secure West Point; after that, the Commander-in-chief focused on André. A board of general officers, led by Major General Greene and including the two foreign generals, Lafayette and Steuben, was convened to report on the specifics of his case and to decide how he should be viewed and what punishment he would face.

The frankness and magnanimity with which André had conducted himself from the time of[Pg 261] his appearance in his real character, had made a very favourable impression on all those with whom he had held any intercourse. From this cause he experienced every mark of indulgent attention which was compatible with his situation; and, from a sense of justice as well as of delicacy, was informed, on the opening of the examination, that he was at liberty not to answer any interrogatory which might embarrass his own feelings. But, as if only desirous to rescue his character from imputations which he dreaded more than death, he confessed every thing material to his own condemnation, but would divulge nothing which might involve others.

The honesty and generosity with which André had acted since[Pg 261] he revealed his true self made a very positive impression on everyone he interacted with. Because of this, he received every sign of gentle consideration suitable for his situation; and out of both fairness and sensitivity, he was told at the start of the examination that he could choose not to answer any questions that might make him uncomfortable. However, as if he only wanted to clear his name of accusations that terrified him more than anything, he admitted everything relevant to his own guilt but refused to share anything that might implicate others.

Trial and execution of Major André.

The board reported the essential facts which had appeared, with their opinion that Major André was a spy, and ought to suffer death. The execution of this sentence was ordered to take place on the day succeeding that on which it was pronounced.

The board reported the key facts that had come to light, along with their belief that Major André was a spy and should face execution. The execution of this sentence was scheduled to take place the day after it was delivered.

Superior to the terrors of death, but dreading disgrace, André was deeply affected by the mode of execution which the laws of war decree to persons in his situation. He wished to die like a soldier, not as a criminal. To obtain a mitigation of his sentence in this respect, he addressed a letter[45] to General Washington, replete with the feelings of a man of sentiment and honour. But the occasion required that the example should make its full impression, and this request[Pg 262] could not be granted. He encountered his fate with composure and dignity; and his whole conduct interested the feelings of all who witnessed it.

Superior to the fear of death, but fearing disgrace, André was deeply troubled by the way the laws of war dictated the punishment for someone in his position. He wanted to die like a soldier, not like a criminal. To try to get his sentence softened in this respect, he wrote a letter[45] to General Washington, filled with the emotions of a man of honor and sentiment. However, the situation demanded that the example be made clear, and his request[Pg 262] could not be granted. He faced his fate with calmness and dignity, and his entire behavior moved the emotions of all who were watching.

The general officers lamented the sentence which the usages of war compelled them to pronounce; and never perhaps did the Commander-in-chief obey with more reluctance the stern mandates of duty and policy. The sympathy excited among the American officers by his fate, was as universal as it is unusual on such occasions; and proclaims alike the merit of him who suffered, and the humanity of those who inflicted the punishment.

The senior officers regretted the decision that the rules of war forced them to make; and perhaps never before did the Commander-in-chief follow the strict demands of duty and policy with such hesitation. The sympathy stirred among the American officers because of his fate was as widespread as it is rare in such situations; and it reflects both the merit of the one who suffered and the humanity of those who carried out the punishment.

Great exertions were made by Sir Henry Clinton, to whom André was particularly dear, first, to have him considered as protected by a flag of truce, and afterwards, as a prisoner of war.

Great efforts were made by Sir Henry Clinton, who was especially fond of André, first to have him seen as protected by a flag of truce, and later, as a prisoner of war.

Even Arnold had the hardihood to interpose. After giving a certificate of facts tending, as he supposed, to exculpate the prisoner, exhausting his powers of reasoning on the case, and appealing to the humanity of the American general, he sought to intimidate that officer, by stating the situation of many of the most distinguished individuals of South Carolina, who had forfeited their lives, but had hitherto been spared through the clemency of the British general. This clemency, he said, could no longer be extended to them should Major André suffer.[Pg 263]

Even Arnold had the nerve to step in. After providing evidence that he thought would clear the prisoner’s name, exhausting his reasoning on the matter, and appealing to the kindness of the American general, he tried to intimidate that officer by highlighting the situation of many prominent individuals from South Carolina who had risked their lives but had so far been spared by the mercy of the British general. He insisted that this mercy wouldn’t extend to them if Major André was executed.[Pg 263]

It may well be supposed that the interposition of Arnold could have no influence on Washington. He conveyed Mrs. Arnold to her husband in New York,[46] and also transmitted his clothes and baggage, for which he had written; but, in every other respect, his letters, which were unanswered, were also unnoticed.

It might be thought that Arnold's involvement would have no effect on Washington. He brought Mrs. Arnold to her husband in New York,[46] and also sent his clothes and belongings, as he had requested; however, in every other way, his letters, which went unanswered, were also ignored.

The mingled sentiments of admiration and compassion excited in every bosom for the unfortunate André, seemed to increase the detestation in which Arnold was held. "André," said General Washington in a private letter, "has met his fate with that fortitude which was to be expected from an accomplished man and a gallant officer; but I am mistaken if at this time Arnold is undergoing the torments of a mental hell. He wants feeling. From some traits[47] of[Pg 264] his character which have lately come to my knowledge, he seems to have been so hardened in crime, so lost to all sense of honour and shame, that, while his faculties still enable him to continue his sordid pursuits, there will be no time for remorse."

The mix of admiration and sympathy for the unfortunate André seemed to heighten the hatred for Arnold. "André," General Washington wrote in a private letter, "faced his fate with the courage we would expect from a skilled man and a brave officer; but I believe that right now, Arnold is suffering from a mental torment. He lacks empathy. From some recent traits of his character that I've learned about, he seems to have become so hardened in crime and so devoid of any sense of honor or shame, that as long as his abilities let him continue his greedy ways, he won't have time for regret."

From motives of policy, or of respect for his engagements, Sir Henry Clinton conferred on Arnold the commission of a brigadier general in the British service, which he preserved throughout the war. Yet it is impossible that rank could have rescued him from the contempt and detestation in which the generous, the honourable, and the brave, could not cease to hold him. It was impossible for men of this description to bury the recollection of his being a traitor, a sordid traitor, first the slave of his rage, then purchased with gold, and finally secured at the expense of the blood of one of the most accomplished officers in the British army.

For political reasons, or out of respect for his commitments, Sir Henry Clinton gave Arnold the rank of brigadier general in the British Army, which he held throughout the war. However, there's no way that this rank could have spared him from the contempt and hatred held by those who were generous, honorable, and brave. It was impossible for such men to forget that he was a traitor, a greedy traitor, first a victim of his own anger, then bought with money, and finally protected at the cost of the life of one of the most skilled officers in the British Army.

His representations of the discontent of the country and of the army concurring with reports from other quarters, had excited the hope that the loyalists and the dissatisfied, allured by British gold, and the prospect of rank in the British service, would flock to his standard, and form a corps at whose head he might again display his accustomed intrepidity. With this hope he published an address to the inhabitants of America, in which he laboured to palliate his own[Pg 265] guilt, and to increase their dissatisfaction with the existing state of things.

His statements about the country's and the army's discontent, along with reports from other sources, had raised hopes that loyalists and those unhappy with the situation, tempted by British money and the chance for status in the British service, would gather under his banner, allowing him to once again show his usual bravery. With this hope, he released a message to the people of America, where he tried to lessen his own[Pg 265] guilt and stir up further dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs.

This appeal to the public was followed by a proclamation addressed "To the officers and soldiers of the continental army, who have the real interests of their country at heart, and who are determined to be no longer the tools and dupes of congress or of France."

This appeal to the public was followed by a proclamation addressed "To the officers and soldiers of the continental army, who have the true interests of their country at heart, and who are committed to not being the instruments and fools of Congress or of France."

The object of this proclamation was to induce the officers and soldiers to desert the cause they had embraced from principle, by holding up to them the very flattering offers of the British general, and contrasting the substantial emoluments of the British service with their present deplorable condition. He attempted to cover this dishonourable proposition with a decent garb, by representing the base step he invited them to take, as the only measure which could restore peace, real liberty, and happiness, to their country.

The goal of this announcement was to persuade the officers and soldiers to abandon the cause they had supported out of principle by presenting them with appealing offers from the British general and comparing the tangible benefits of serving the British with their current miserable situation. He tried to disguise this dishonorable suggestion as a respectable option, claiming that the cowardly choice he was encouraging them to make was the only way to bring peace, true freedom, and happiness back to their country.

These inducements did not produce their intended effect. Although the temper of the army might be irritated by real suffering, and by the supposed neglect of government, no diminution of patriotism had been produced. Through all the hardships, irritations, and vicissitudes of the war, Arnold remains the solitary instance of an American officer who abandoned the side first embraced in this civil contest, and turned his sword upon his former companions in arms.[Pg 266]

These incentives didn't have the desired effect. Even though the army's mood might have been worsened by actual suffering and what they thought was government neglect, it didn't lessen their patriotism. Throughout all the struggles, frustrations, and changes during the war, Arnold stands out as the only American officer who left the side he initially supported in this civil conflict and turned his weapon against his former comrades.[Pg 266]

When the probable consequences of this plot, had it been successful, were considered, and the combination of apparent accidents by which it was discovered and defeated, was recollected, all were filled with awful astonishment; and the devout perceived in the transaction, the hand of Providence guiding America to independence.

When people thought about what could have happened if this plan had worked, and remembered the series of lucky accidents that led to its discovery and failure, everyone was filled with shock; and those who were faithful saw in what happened the hand of Providence steering America toward independence.

The thanks of congress were voted to the three militia men[48] who had rendered this invaluable service; and a silver medal, with an inscription expressive of their fidelity and patriotism, was directed to be presented to each of them. In addition to this flattering testimonial of their worth, and as a farther evidence of national gratitude, a resolution was passed granting to each, two hundred dollars per annum during life, to be paid in specie or an equivalent in current money.

The thanks of Congress were given to the three militia men[48] who provided this invaluable service; and a silver medal, inscribed to reflect their loyalty and patriotism, was ordered to be presented to each of them. Along with this commendation of their value, and as further proof of national gratitude, a resolution was passed granting each of them a payment of two hundred dollars a year for life, to be paid in cash or its equivalent in current money.

The efforts of General Washington to obtain a permanent military force, or its best substitute, a regular system for filling the vacant ranks with draughts who should join the army on the first day of January in each year, were still continued. Notwithstanding the embarrassments with which congress was surrounded, it is not easy to find adequate reasons for the neglect of representations so interesting, and of recommendations apparently so essential to the safety of the United States.[Pg 267]

General Washington's efforts to establish a permanent military force, or at least a reliable way to fill empty positions with recruits who would join the army on January 1st each year, were ongoing. Despite the challenges that Congress faced, it's hard to find good reasons for ignoring such important concerns and recommendations that seemed vital to the safety of the United States.[Pg 267]

Parties in Congress.

Private letters disclose the fact that two parties still agitated congress. One entered fully into the views of the Commander-in-chief. The other, jealous of the army, and apprehensive of its hostility to liberty when peace should be restored, remained unwilling to give stability to its constitution by increasing the numbers who were to serve during the war. They seemed to dread the danger from the enemy to which its fluctuations would expose them, less than the danger which might be apprehended for the civil authority from its permanent character. They caught with avidity at every intelligence which encouraged the flattering hope of a speedy peace,[49] but entered reluctantly into measures founded on the supposition that the war might be of long duration. Perfectly acquainted with the extent of the jealousies entertained on this subject, although, to use his own expressions to a friend, "Heaven knows how unjustly," Gen[Pg 268]eral Washington had foreborne to press the necessity of regular and timely reinforcements to his army so constantly and so earnestly as his own judgment directed. But the experience of every campaign furnished such strong additional evidences of the impolicy and danger of continuing to rely on temporary expedients, and the uncertainty of collecting a force to co-operate with the auxiliaries from France was so peculiarly embarrassing, that he at length resolved to conquer the delicacy by which he had been in some degree restrained, and to open himself fully on the subject which he deemed more essential than any other to the success of the war.

Private letters reveal that two groups were still stirring up Congress. One group completely aligned with the Commander-in-chief's views. The other, wary of the army and concerned that it could threaten freedom once peace was achieved, was hesitant to solidify its constitution by increasing the number of soldiers who would serve during the war. They seemed to fear the enemy's threat posed by the army's fluctuations more than the potential threat to civil authority from a permanent army. They eagerly seized on every piece of news that suggested a quick peace,[49] but were reluctant to take actions based on assumptions that the war could last a long time. Fully aware of the extent of the suspicions surrounding this issue, although, to quote him directly to a friend, "Heaven knows how unjustly," General Washington had held back from stressing the urgent need for regular and timely reinforcements to his army as much as he believed was necessary. However, each campaign reinforced the clear evidence of the foolishness and danger of relying on temporary solutions, and the uncertainty of gathering a force alongside the French auxiliaries was especially challenging. As a result, he ultimately decided to overcome the hesitation that had somewhat restrained him and to fully address the issue he believed was more crucial than any other to the war's success.

August.

In August, while looking anxiously for such a reinforcement to the Chevalier de Tunay as would give him the command of the American seas, and while uncertain whether the campaign might not pass away without giving a single advantage promised at its opening, he transmitted a letter to congress, fully and freely imparting his sentiments on the state of things.

In August, while nervously searching for support to help the Chevalier de Tunay gain control of the American seas, and uncertain whether the campaign would end without achieving any of the promised advantages, he sent a letter to Congress, openly sharing his thoughts on the situation.

Letter of General Washington on American affairs.

As this letter contains an exact statement of American affairs, according to the view taken of them by General Washington, and a faithful picture of the consequences of the ruinous policy which had been pursued, drawn by the man best acquainted with them, copious extracts from it will, at least, be excused.

As this letter provides an accurate account of American affairs, reflecting General Washington's perspective, and offers a true depiction of the disastrous policy that had been followed, which is presented by someone who knows them well, extensive excerpts from it will at least be justified.

After examining the sources of supplies for the campaign, he proceeds to say—"But while[Pg 269] we are meditating offensive operations which may not be undertaken at all, or, being undertaken, may fail, I am persuaded congress are not inattentive to the present state of the army, and will view in the same light with me the necessity of providing in time against a period (the first of January) when one half of our present force will dissolve. The shadow of an army that will remain, will have every motive, except mere patriotism, to abandon the service, without the hope which has hitherto supported them, of a change for the better. This is almost extinguished now, and certainly will not outlive the campaign, unless it finds something more substantial to rest upon. This is a truth of which every spectator of the distresses of the army can not help being convinced. Those at a distance may speculate differently; but on the spot an opinion to the contrary, judging human nature on the usual scale, would be chimerical.

After looking into the supply sources for the campaign, he goes on to say—"But while[Pg 269] we are planning offensive operations that may not happen at all, or if they do, may fail, I am convinced that Congress is paying attention to the current state of the army and will agree with me on the urgent need to prepare in advance for a time (the first of January) when half of our current forces will dissolve. The remaining soldiers will have every reason, apart from just patriotism, to leave the service, especially without the hope that has previously kept them going, of a better situation. That hope is nearly gone now and will definitely not last through the campaign unless it finds something more solid to rely on. This is a truth that anyone witnessing the army's struggles can't help but see. Those far away might think otherwise, but being on the ground, an opinion to the contrary, judging human nature by the usual standards, would be unrealistic."

"The honourable the committee of congress, who have seen and heard for themselves, will add their testimony to mine; and the wisdom and justice of congress can not fail to give it the most serious attention. To me it will appear miraculous, if our affairs can maintain themselves much longer in their present train. If either the temper or the resources of the country will not admit of an alteration, we may expect soon to be reduced to the humiliating condition of seeing the cause of America, in America, up[Pg 270]held by foreign arms. The generosity of our allies has a claim to all our confidence, and all our gratitude; but it is neither for the honour of America, nor for the interest of the common cause, to leave the work entirely to them."

"The honorable committee of Congress, who have seen and heard everything for themselves, will support my testimony; and the wisdom and fairness of Congress can't help but take it very seriously. It will seem miraculous to me if our situation can hold together much longer as it is. If the spirit or resources of the country won’t allow for a change, we can soon expect to find ourselves in the embarrassing position of having the cause of America defended in America by foreign forces. The kindness of our allies deserves all our trust and gratitude; however, it’s neither honorable for America nor beneficial for our shared cause to leave everything to them."

He then reviewed the resources of Great Britain; and, after showing her ability still to prosecute the war, added—"The inference from these reflections is, that we can not count upon a speedy end of the war; and that it is the true policy of America not to content herself with temporary expedients, but to endeavour, if possible, to give consistency and solidity to her measures. An essential step to this will be immediately to devise a plan and put it in execution, for providing men in time to replace those who will leave us at the end of the year; and for subsisting and for making a reasonable allowance to the officers and soldiers.

He then looked over Great Britain's resources and, after demonstrating her capability to continue the war, added—"The takeaway from these thoughts is that we can't expect a quick end to the war; and it’s in America's best interest not to settle for temporary solutions, but to strive, if possible, to create stability and strength in her actions. A crucial step toward this will be to quickly come up with a plan and implement it to recruit men to replace those who will leave us at the end of the year, and to provide for the needs of and give a fair allowance to the officers and soldiers."

"The plan for this purpose ought to be of general operation, and such as will execute itself. Experience has shown that a peremptory draught will be the only effectual one. If a draught for the war or for three years can be effected, it ought to be made on every account; a shorter period than a year is inadmissible.

"The plan for this should be broadly applicable and self-executing. Experience has demonstrated that a mandatory draft will be the only effective solution. If a draft for the war or for three years can be implemented, it should be done for all reasons; a duration shorter than a year is not acceptable."

"To one who has been witness to the evils brought upon us by short enlistments, the system appears to have been pernicious beyond description; and a crowd of motives present themselves to dictate a change. It may easily be[Pg 271] shown that all the misfortunes we have met with in the military line, are to be attributed to this cause.

"To someone who has seen the harm caused by short enlistments, the system seems incredibly damaging; and many reasons suggest a need for change. It's clear that all the problems we've faced in the military can be traced back to this issue.[Pg 271]"

"Had we formed a permanent army in the beginning, which, by the continuance of the same men in service, had been capable of discipline, we never should have to retreat with a handful of men across the Delaware in 1776, trembling for the fate of America, which nothing but the infatuation of the enemy could have saved; we should not have remained all the succeeding winter at their mercy, with sometimes scarcely a sufficient body of men to mount the ordinary guards, liable at every moment to be dissipated, if they had only thought proper to march against us; we should not have been under the necessity of fighting at Brandywine with an unequal number of raw troops, and afterwards of seeing Philadelphia fall a prey to a victorious army; we should not have been at Valley Forge with less than half the force of the enemy, destitute of every thing in a situation neither to resist nor to retire; we should not have seen New York left with a handful of men, yet an overmatch for the main army of these states, while the principal part of their force was detached for the reduction of two of them; we should not have found ourselves this spring so weak as to be insulted by five thousand men, unable to protect our baggage and magazines, their security depending on a good countenance, and a want[Pg 272] of enterprise in the enemy; we should not have been, the greatest part of the war, inferior to the enemy, indebted for our safety to their inactivity, enduring frequently the mortification of seeing inviting opportunities to ruin them, pass unimproved for want of a force which the country was completely able to afford; to see the country ravaged, our towns burnt, the inhabitants plundered, abused, murdered, with impunity from the same cause."

"Had we established a permanent army from the start, composed of the same soldiers who could have been disciplined, we would never have had to retreat with just a handful of men across the Delaware in 1776, fearing for America's future, which was only spared by the enemy's foolishness. We wouldn't have spent the entire following winter at their mercy, sometimes with barely enough troops to even maintain regular guard duties, vulnerable at any moment to being overwhelmed if they chose to march against us. We wouldn't have had to fight at Brandywine with a smaller number of inexperienced troops and then watch as Philadelphia fell to a victorious army. We wouldn’t have been at Valley Forge with less than half the enemy's strength, lacking everything in a situation where we could neither defend ourselves nor retreat. We wouldn’t have seen New York protected by just a few men, yet they were still stronger than the main army of these states, while most of their forces were sent to capture two of them. We wouldn’t have found ourselves this spring so weak that we were humiliated by five thousand men, unable to safeguard our supplies, relying on a good attitude and the enemy’s lack of action for our security. We wouldn’t have spent the majority of the war at a disadvantage to the enemy, relying on their inactivity for our safety, often enduring the frustration of watching promising chances to defeat them slip away due to a lack of forces that the country could fully support; to witness the country devastated, our towns burned, the people plundered, mistreated, and killed, all with impunity because of the same reason."

After presenting in detail the embarrassments under which the civil departments of the army also had laboured, in consequence of the expensiveness and waste inseparable from its temporary character, he proceeded to observe—"There is every reason to believe, that the war has been protracted on this account. Our opposition being less, made the successes of the enemy greater. The fluctuation of the army kept alive their hopes; and at every period of a dissolution of a considerable part of it, they have flattered themselves with some decisive advantages. Had we kept a permanent army on foot, the enemy could have had nothing to hope for, and would in all probability have listened to terms long since. If the army is left in its present situation, it must continue an encouragement to the efforts of the enemy; if it is put in a respectable one, it must have a contrary effect; and nothing I believe will tend more to give us peace the ensuing winter. Many circumstances will contribute to[Pg 273] a negotiation. An army on foot, not only for another campaign, but for several campaigns, would determine the enemy to pacific measures, and enable us to insist upon favourable terms in forcible language. An army insignificant in numbers, dissatisfied, crumbling to pieces, would be the strongest temptation they could have to try the experiment a little longer. It is an old maxim that the surest way to make a good peace is to be well prepared for war.

After detailing the challenges faced by the civil departments of the army due to the high costs and waste associated with its temporary setup, he went on to say—"There’s every reason to think that the war has dragged on because of this. With less opposition, the enemy felt more successful. The constant changes in our army kept their hopes alive, and every time a significant part of it dissolved, they convinced themselves they’d gain decisive advantages. If we had maintained a permanent army, the enemy wouldn’t have had any hopes and likely would have agreed to terms much earlier. If the army remains in its current state, it will continue to encourage the enemy; but if it's in a strong position, it will have the opposite effect, and I believe this will help us achieve peace this coming winter. Many factors will contribute to[Pg 273] a negotiation. An active army, not just for another campaign, but for several, would push the enemy toward peaceful actions and give us the leverage to demand favorable terms forcefully. An army that is small, unhappy, and falling apart would only tempt them to prolong the conflict a bit longer. It’s an old saying that the best way to secure a good peace is to be well-prepared for war."

"I can not forbear returning in this place to the necessity of a more ample and equal provision for the army. The discontents on this head have been gradually matured to a dangerous extremity. There are many symptoms that alarm and distress me. Endeavours are using to unite both officers and men in a general refusal of the money, and some corps now actually decline receiving it. Every method has been taken to counteract it, because such a combination in the army would be a severe blow to our declining currency. The most moderate insist that the accounts of depreciation ought to be liquidated at stated periods, and certificates given by government for the sums due. They will not be satisfied with a general declaration that it shall be made good.

"I can’t help but return here to the need for better and fairer support for the army. The dissatisfaction over this issue has gradually reached a dangerous point. There are many signs that alarm and worry me. Efforts are being made to unite both officers and soldiers in a collective refusal of the money, and some units are now actually refusing to accept it. Every possible method has been employed to counteract this, because such a coalition in the army would seriously hurt our weakening currency. The most reasonable people insist that the accounts of depreciation should be resolved at regular intervals, and that the government should issue certificates for the amounts owed. They won’t be satisfied with just a general promise that it will be made right."

"I have often said, and I beg leave to repeat it, the half pay provision is in my opinion the most politic and effectual that can be adopted. On the whole, if something satisfactory be not[Pg 274] done, the army (already so much reduced in officers by daily resignations as not to have a sufficiency to do the common duties of it) must either cease to exist at the end of the campaign, or will exhibit an example of more virtue, fortitude, self-denial, and perseverance, than has perhaps ever yet been paralleled in the history of human enthusiasm.

"I've often said, and I want to repeat, that the half pay provision is, in my opinion, the most practical and effective option we can choose. Overall, if we don't do something satisfactory [Pg 274], the army (which is already so depleted in officers due to daily resignations that it can't perform its basic duties) will either stop existing by the end of the campaign or will show an example of more virtue, strength, self-discipline, and perseverance than has probably ever been seen in the history of human enthusiasm."

"The dissolution of the army is an event that can not be regarded with indifference. It would bring accumulated distress upon us; it would throw the people of America into a general consternation; it would discredit our cause throughout the world; it would shock our allies. To think of replacing the officers with others is visionary. The loss of the veteran soldiers could not be replaced. To attempt to carry on the war with militia against disciplined troops, will be to attempt what the common sense and common experience of mankind will pronounce to be impracticable. But I should fail in respect to congress, to dwell on observations of this kind in a letter to them."

"The dissolution of the army is an event we cannot ignore. It would bring us immense suffering; it would throw the people of America into widespread panic; it would discredit our cause around the world; it would shock our allies. The idea of replacing the officers with others is unrealistic. We can't replace the experienced soldiers. Trying to continue the war with militias against trained troops would be to undertake something that common sense and experience would deem impossible. However, I would be remiss to Congress if I focused on these kinds of observations in a letter to them."

Proceedings of Congress respecting the army.

At length the committee presented their report, reorganizing the regiments, reducing their number, and apportioning on the several states their respective numbers to complete the establishment. This report, being approved by congress, was transmitted to the Commander-in-chief for his consideration. By this arrangement, the states were required to recruit their[Pg 275] quotas for the war, and to bring them into the field by the first of January; but, if in any state, it should be found impracticable to raise the men for the war by the first day of December, it was recommended to such state to supply the deficiency with men engaged to serve for not less than one year.

At last, the committee shared their report, reorganizing the regiments, cutting down their numbers, and distributing each state’s share to complete the establishment. This report, once approved by Congress, was sent to the Commander-in-chief for review. Under this plan, the states had to recruit their[Pg 275] quotas for the war and have them ready by January 1st. However, if any state found it impossible to gather the needed troops by December 1st, it was suggested that the state fill the gap with soldiers committed to serve for at least one year.

In compliance with the request of congress, General Washington submitted his objections to the plan, in a long and respectful letter.

In response to Congress's request, General Washington shared his concerns about the plan in a lengthy and respectful letter.

He recommended that legionary corps should be substituted in the place of regiments entirely of cavalry. He thought it more adviseable that the infantry attached to the cavalry should compose a part of the corps permanently, than that it should be drawn occasionally from the regiments of foot.

He suggested that legionary units should replace regiments made up entirely of cavalry. He believed it would be better for the infantry assigned to the cavalry to be a permanent part of the unit, rather than being called up occasionally from the foot regiments.

The reduction in the number of regiments appeared to him a subject of great delicacy. The last reduction, he said, had occasioned many to quit the service, independent of those who were discontinued; and had left durable seeds of discontent among those who remained. The general topic of declamation was, that it was as hard as dishonourable, for men who had made every sacrifice to the service, to be turned out of it, at the pleasure of those in power, without an adequate compensation. In the maturity to which their uneasiness had now risen from a continuance of misery, they would be still more impatient under an attempt of a similar nature.[Pg 276]

The cutback in the number of regiments seemed to him a very sensitive issue. He noted that the last reduction had led many to leave the service, aside from those who were officially discharged, and had planted lasting seeds of discontent among those who stayed. The general argument was that it was both unfair and dishonorable for men who had sacrificed so much for the service to be dismissed at the whim of those in charge, without appropriate compensation. Given how much their frustration had grown from ongoing hardship, they would be even less tolerant of a similar attempt now.[Pg 276]

It was not, he said, the intention of his remarks to discourage a reform, but to show the necessity of guarding against the ill effects which might otherwise attend it, by making an ample provision both for the officers who should remain in the service, and for those who should be reduced. This should be the basis of the plan; and without it, the most mischievous consequences were to be apprehended. He was aware of the difficulty of making a present provision sufficiently ample to give satisfaction; but this only proved the expediency of making one for the future, and brought him to that which he had so frequently recommended as the most economical, the most politic, and the most effectual, that could be devised; this was half pay for life. Supported by the prospect of a permanent provision, the officers would be tied to the service, and would submit to many momentary privations, and to those inconveniences, which the situation of public affairs rendered unavoidable. If the objection drawn from the principle that the measure was incompatible with the genius of the government should be thought insurmountable, he would propose a substitute, less eligible in his opinion, but which would answer the purpose. It was to make the present half pay for seven years, whole pay for the same period. He also recommended that depreciation on the pay received, should be made up to the officers who should be reduced.[Pg 277]

He stated that his comments were not meant to discourage reform, but to emphasize the need to protect against potential negative effects by ensuring sufficient support for both officers who would stay in service and those who would be let go. This should be the foundation of the plan; without it, serious issues could arise. He recognized that creating a current provision large enough to satisfy everyone was challenging, but this only highlighted the need for future planning, leading him to his frequently suggested solution, which he believed to be the most cost-effective, political, and efficient option: lifetime half pay. With the promise of a steady income, officers would be committed to their roles and willing to endure various temporary hardships and the challenges posed by the state of public affairs. If the argument that the proposal was contrary to the government's principles seemed impossible to overcome, he offered an alternative, which he considered less ideal but still effective. This alternative was to provide half pay for seven years, with full pay for the same duration. He also suggested that any depreciation in the pay received should be compensated for the officers who would be let go.[Pg 277]

No objection occurred to the measure now recommended, but the expense it would occasion. In his judgment, whatever would give consistency to the military establishment, would be ultimately favourable to economy. It was not easy to be conceived, except by those who had witnessed it, what an additional waste and increased consumption of every thing, and consequently what an increase of expense, resulted from laxness of discipline in an army; and where officers thought they did a favour by holding their commissions, and the men were continually fluctuating, to maintain discipline was impossible. Nothing could be more obvious to him than that a sound military establishment and real economy were the same. That the purposes of war would be greatly promoted by it was too clear to admit of argument. He objected also to the mode of effecting the reduction. This was by leaving it to the several states to select the officers who should remain in service. He regretted that congress had not thought proper to retain the reduction and incorporation of the regiments under their own discretion. He regretted that it should be left to the states, not only because it was an adherence to the state system, which in the arrangements of the army, he disapproved; but because also he feared it would introduce much confusion and discontent in a business which ought to be conducted with the greatest circumspection. He feared also that professing[Pg 278] to select the officers to be retained in service would give disgust both to those who should be discontinued, and to those who should remain. The former would be sent away under the public stigma of inferior merit, and the latter would feel no pleasure in a present preference, when they reflected that, at some future period, they might experience a similar fate.

No one objected to the measure being recommended now, except for the cost it would incur. In his opinion, anything that brought stability to the military would ultimately be beneficial for saving money. It was hard to imagine, except for those who had seen it firsthand, how much waste and increased consumption of everything, and thus higher costs, stemmed from a lack of discipline in an army. When officers believed they were doing a favor by holding their positions, and the soldiers were constantly changing, keeping discipline impossible. To him, it was obvious that a strong military and real savings were the same. The benefits of war would be greatly enhanced by it, which was too clear to argue against. He also disagreed with the method of implementing the cuts. This involved leaving it up to the individual states to choose which officers would remain in service. He wished Congress had decided to manage the reduction and merging of the regiments themselves. He lamented that it was left to the states, not only because he disapproved of the reliance on the state system when organizing the army, but also because he feared it would create a lot of confusion and dissatisfaction in a matter that should be handled very carefully. He was also concerned that having states [Pg 278] select which officers would stay could create resentment among those who were let go and those who remained. The former would leave with a public mark of lesser merit, and the latter would not feel pleased about their current selection, knowing that one day they might face the same fate.

He wished with much sincerity that congress had been pleased to make no alteration in the term of service, but had confined their requisition to men who should serve for the war, to be raised by enlistment, draught, or assessment, as might be found necessary. As it now stood, there would be very few men for the war, and all the evils of temporary engagements would still be felt. In the present temper of the states, he entertained the most flattering hopes that they would enter on vigorous measures to raise an army for the war, if congress appeared decided respecting it; but if they held up a different idea as admissible, it would be again concluded that they did not think an army for the war essential. This would encourage the opposition of men of narrow, interested, and feeble tempers, and enable them to defeat the primary object of the revolution.

He sincerely wished that Congress had chosen not to change the length of service and had limited their requests to men who would serve for the duration of the war, to be recruited through enlistment, draft, or assessment as necessary. As things stood, there would be very few men available for the war, and all the problems of temporary enlistments would still be experienced. Given the current attitude of the states, he had high hopes that they would take strong action to raise an army for the war if Congress seemed firm on the matter; but if they suggested a different approach as acceptable, it would be assumed that they didn't believe a wartime army was necessary. This would encourage the opposition from individuals with narrow, self-serving, and weak-minded views, and allow them to undermine the main goal of the revolution.

This letter was taken into consideration; and the measures it recommended were pursued in almost every particular. Even the two great principles which were viewed with most jealousy,[Pg 279]—an army for the war, and half pay for life,—were adopted. It would have greatly abridged the calamities of America, could these resolutions have been carried into execution. Every effort for the purpose was made by the Commander-in-chief.

This letter was considered, and the suggested actions were mostly implemented. Even the two main ideas that were looked at with the most suspicion—an army for the war and lifetime half pay—were adopted. It would have significantly reduced the hardships in America if these resolutions had been put into action. The Commander-in-chief made every effort to achieve this.

To place the officers of the army in a situation which would render their commissions valuable, and hold out to them the prospect of a comfortable old age, in a country saved by their blood, their sufferings, and the labours of their best years, was an object which had always been dear to the heart of General Washington, and he had seized every opportunity to press it on congress. That body had approached it slowly, taking step after step with apparent reluctance, as the necessity of the measure became more and more obvious.

To put the army officers in a position that would make their commissions worthwhile and offer them the hope of a secure retirement in a country they had fought for with their blood, hardships, and the best years of their lives was something General Washington always cared deeply about. He took every chance to advocate for this to Congress. That group moved forward slowly, taking one step at a time with clear hesitation, as the need for the measure became increasingly evident.

The first resolution on the subject, passed in May, 1778, allowed to all military officers who should continue in service during the war, and not hold any office of profit under the United States or any of them, half pay for seven years, if they lived so long. At the same time the sum of eighty dollars, in addition to his pay, was granted to every non-commissioned officer and soldier who should serve to the end of the war. In 1779 this subject was resumed. After much debate, its farther consideration was postponed; and the officers and soldiers were recommended to the attention of their several states, with a[Pg 280] declaration that their patriotism, valour, and perseverance, in defence of the rights and liberties of their country, had entitled them to the gratitude, as well as the approbation of their fellow citizens.

The first resolution on the topic, passed in May 1778, granted all military officers who would remain in service throughout the war, and who did not hold any profit-making office under the United States or any of its states, half pay for seven years, provided they lived that long. At the same time, a bonus of eighty dollars, in addition to their pay, was given to every non-commissioned officer and soldier who served until the end of the war. In 1779, this issue was revisited. After considerable discussion, further consideration was postponed; and the officers and soldiers were recommended to the attention of their respective states, with a[Pg 280] declaration that their patriotism, bravery, and perseverance in defense of the rights and liberties of their country had earned them the gratitude as well as the approval of their fellow citizens.

In 1780, a memorial from the general officers, depicting in strong terms the situation of the army, and requiring present support, and some future provision, was answered by a reference to what had been already done, and by a declaration "That patience, self-denial, fortitude and perseverance, and the cheerful sacrifice of time and health, are necessary virtues which both the citizen and soldier are called to exercise, while struggling for the liberties of their country; and that moderation, frugality, and temperance, must be among the chief supports, as well as the brightest ornaments of that kind of civil government which is wisely instituted by the several states in this Union."

In 1780, a letter from the top military officers described the army's challenging situation and asked for immediate support and future resources. The response pointed to what had already been accomplished and stated, "Patience, self-denial, courage, perseverance, and the willing sacrifice of time and health are essential qualities that both citizens and soldiers must show while fighting for their country's freedoms. Additionally, moderation, frugality, and temperance should be key supports, as well as the most admirable qualities of the kind of civil government that is thoughtfully established by the various states in this Union."

This philosophic lecture on the virtues of temperance to men who were often without food, and always scantily supplied, was still calculated to assuage irritations fomented by the neglect which was believed to have been sustained. In a few days afterwards, the subject was brought again before congress, and a more conciliating temper was manifested. The odious restriction, limiting the half pay for seven years to those who should hold no post of profit under the United States or any of them, was removed; and[Pg 281] the bounty allowed the men was extended to the widows and orphans of those who had died or should die in the service; at length, the vote passed which has been stated, allowing half pay for life to all officers who should serve in the armies of the United States to the end of the war.

This philosophical lecture on the benefits of self-control to men who often went hungry and were always limited in resources was still meant to calm frustrations caused by the neglect they felt they had experienced. A few days later, the issue was brought up again in Congress, and a more conciliatory attitude was shown. The unfair restriction that limited half pay for seven years to those who held no profitable positions under the United States or any of its entities was lifted; and[Pg 281] the benefits provided to the soldiers were expanded to include the widows and orphans of those who died or would die in service; finally, the vote passed allowing half pay for life to all officers who served in the armies of the United States until the end of the war.

Resolutions were also passed, recommending it to the several states to make up the depreciation on the pay which had been received by the army; and it was determined that their future services should be compensated in the money of the new emission, the value of which, it was supposed, might be kept up by taxes and by loans.

Resolutions were also passed, advising the various states to cover the depreciation on the pay that the army had received; and it was decided that their future services should be compensated in the currency of the new emission, the value of which was expected to be maintained through taxes and loans.

While the government of the Union was thus employed in maturing measures for the preservation of its military establishment, the time for action passed away without furnishing any material event. The hostile armies continued to watch each other until the season of the year forced them out of the field.

While the Union government was focused on finalizing plans to maintain its military, the opportunity for action went by without any significant occurrences. The opposing armies kept an eye on one another until the weather made it impossible for them to stay in the field.

Just before retiring into winter quarters, a handsome enterprise was executed by Major Talmadge, of Colonel Sheldon's regiment of light dragoons. That gentleman had been generally stationed on the lines, on the east side of the North River, and had been distinguished for the accuracy of his intelligence.

Just before settling in for the winter, Major Talmadge from Colonel Sheldon's light dragoons carried out an impressive operation. He had typically been stationed along the eastern side of the North River and was known for the reliability of his intelligence.

He was informed that a large magazine of forage had been collected at Coram, on Long[Pg 282] Island, which was protected by the militia of the country, the cruisers in the Sound, and a small garrison in its neighbourhood.

He was told that a big stash of fodder had been gathered at Coram on Long[Pg 282] Island, which was guarded by the local militia, cruisers in the Sound, and a small garrison nearby.

Major Talmadge destroys the British stores at Coram.

At the head of a detachment of eighty dismounted dragoons, under the command of Captain Edgar, and of eight or ten who were mounted, he passed the Sound where it was twenty miles wide, marched across the island in the night, and so completely surprised the fort, that his troops entered the works on three different sides before the garrison was prepared to resist them. The British took refuge in two houses connected with the fortifications, and commenced a fire from the doors and windows. Nov. 21.These were instantly forced open; and the whole party, amounting to fifty-four, among whom were a lieutenant colonel, captain, and subaltern, were killed or taken. Stores to a considerable amount were destroyed, the fort was demolished, and the magazines were consumed by fire. The objects of the expedition being accomplished, Major Talmadge recrossed the Sound without having lost a man. On the recommendation of General Washington, congress passed a resolution, expressing a high sense of the merit of those engaged in the expedition.

At the head of a group of eighty dismounted dragoons, led by Captain Edgar, along with eight or ten mounted soldiers, he crossed the Sound where it was twenty miles wide, marched across the island at night, and completely surprised the fort, allowing his troops to enter from three different sides before the garrison was ready to fight back. The British took cover in two houses connected to the fortifications and started shooting from the doors and windows. Nov 21.These were quickly forced open, and the entire group, totaling fifty-four, including a lieutenant colonel, captain, and subaltern, were either killed or captured. A significant amount of supplies was destroyed, the fort was torn down, and the ammunition stores were set on fire. With the goals of the mission accomplished, Major Talmadge crossed back over the Sound without losing a single man. Following General Washington's recommendation, Congress passed a resolution acknowledging the significant contributions of those involved in the expedition.

December.
The army retires into winter quarters.

No objects for enterprise presenting themselves, the troops were placed in winter quarters early in December. The Pennsylvania line was stationed near Morristown; the Jersey line about Pompton, on the confines of New York and New[Pg 283] Jersey; and the troops belonging to the New England states, at West Point, and in its vicinity, on both sides the North River. The line of the state of New York remained at Albany, to which place it had been detached for the purpose of opposing an invasion from Canada.

With no opportunities for engagement, the troops were put into winter quarters in early December. The Pennsylvania line was stationed near Morristown; the Jersey line was around Pompton, at the border of New York and New Jersey; and the troops from the New England states were at West Point and nearby areas on both sides of the North River. The New York state line stayed in Albany, where it had been sent to prevent an invasion from Canada.

Irruption of Major Carlton into New York.

Major Carlton, at the head of one thousand men, composed of Europeans, Indians, and Tories, had made a sudden irruption into the northern parts of New York, and taken forts Ann and George, with their garrisons. At the same time, Sir John Johnson, at the head of a corps composed of the same materials, appeared on the Mohawk. Several sharp skirmishes were fought in that quarter with the continental troops, and a regiment of new levies, aided by the militia of the country. General Clinton's brigade was ordered to their assistance; but before he could reach the scene of action, the invading armies had retired, after laying waste the whole country through which they passed.

Major Carlton, leading a thousand men made up of Europeans, Indians, and Loyalists, suddenly invaded the northern parts of New York, capturing Forts Ann and George along with their troops. At the same time, Sir John Johnson, leading a group of the same mix, appeared in the Mohawk area. Several fierce skirmishes occurred there with the Continental troops and a newly formed regiment, supported by local militia. General Clinton's brigade was sent to help them; however, before he could get to the battlefield, the invading forces had retreated, leaving destruction in their wake across the entire region they had traversed.

While the disorder of the American finances, the exhausted state of the country, and the debility of the government, determined Great Britain to persevere in offensive war against the United States, by keeping alive her hopes of conquest, Europe assumed an aspect not less formidable to the permanent grandeur of that nation, than hostile to its present views. European transactions.In the summer of 1780, Russia, Sweden, and Denmark, entered into the celebrated compact, which has[Pg 284] been generally denominated "THE ARMED NEUTRALITY." Holland had also declared a determination to accede to the same confederacy; and it is not improbable that this measure contributed to the declaration of war which was made by Great Britain against that power towards the close of the present year.

While the disarray of American finances, the country's exhausted condition, and the weakness of the government led Great Britain to continue its offensive war against the United States by keeping its hopes of conquest alive, Europe presented a challenge that was as threatening to the lasting strength of that nation as it was opposed to its current ambitions. EU transactions. In the summer of 1780, Russia, Sweden, and Denmark formed the well-known agreement, commonly referred to as "THE ARMED NEUTRALITY." Holland also announced its intention to join this alliance, and it’s likely that this decision played a role in the declaration of war that Great Britain issued against that nation later in the year.

The long friendship which had existed between the two nations was visibly weakened from the commencement of the American war. Holland was peculiarly desirous of participating in that commerce which the independence of the United States would open to the world: and, from the commencement of hostilities, her merchants, especially those of Amsterdam, watched the progress of the war with anxiety, and engaged in speculations which were profitable to themselves and beneficial to the United States. The remonstrances made by the British minister at the Hague against this conduct, were answered in the most amicable manner by the government, but the practice of individuals continued the same.

The longstanding friendship between the two nations was clearly strained from the start of the American war. Holland was particularly eager to join in the trade that the independence of the United States would create for the world. From the beginning of hostilities, her merchants, especially those from Amsterdam, monitored the war's developments with concern and took part in ventures that profited them and helped the United States. The British minister in The Hague protested against this behavior, but the government responded in a friendly way, while individuals continued their practices unchanged.

When the war broke out between France and England, a number of Dutch vessels trading with France, laden with materials for shipbuilding, were seized, and carried into the ports of Great Britain, although the existing treaties between the two nations were understood to exclude those articles from the list of contraband of war. The British cabinet justified these acts[Pg 285] of violence, and persisted in refusing to permit naval stores to be carried to her enemy in neutral bottoms. This refusal, however, was accompanied with friendly professions, with an offer to pay for the vessels and cargoes already seized, and with proposals to form new stipulations for the future regulation of that commerce.

When the war broke out between France and England, several Dutch ships trading with France, loaded with shipbuilding materials, were seized and taken into British ports, even though the existing treaties between the two nations were understood to exclude those items from the list of contraband. The British government defended these acts[Pg 285] of aggression and continued to refuse to allow naval supplies to be transported to their enemy on neutral ships. However, this refusal was accompanied by friendly statements, an offer to compensate for the vessels and cargoes already taken, and proposals to create new agreements for the future regulation of that trade.

The States General refused to enter into any negotiations for the modification of subsisting treaties; and the merchants of all the great trading towns, especially those of Amsterdam, expressed the utmost indignation at the injuries they had sustained. In consequence of this conduct, the British government required those succours which were stipulated in ancient treaties, and insisted that the casus fœderis had now occurred. Advantage was taken of the refusal of the States General to comply with this demand, to declare the treaties between the two nations at an end.

The States General refused to negotiate any changes to existing treaties, and the merchants from all the major trading cities, particularly Amsterdam, were extremely angry about the losses they had suffered. As a result of this behavior, the British government demanded the support promised in old treaties and argued that the casus fœderis had now taken place. The refusal of the States General to meet this demand was used as a reason to declare the treaties between the two nations null and void.

The temper produced by this state of things, inclined Holland to enter into the treaty for an armed neutrality; and, in November, the Dutch government acceded to it. Some unknown causes prevented the actual signature of the treaty on the part of the States General, until a circumstance occurred which was used for the purpose of placing them in a situation not to avail themselves of the aid stipulated by that confederacy to its members.[Pg 286]

The mood created by this situation led Holland to agree to the treaty for armed neutrality, and in November, the Dutch government joined it. However, some unknown reasons delayed the actual signing of the treaty by the States General until an event happened that was used to prevent them from benefiting from the assistance promised by that confederacy to its members.[Pg 286]

While Mr. Lee, one of the ministers of the United States, was on a mission to the courts of Vienna and Berlin, he fell in company with a Mr. John de Neufwille, a merchant of Amsterdam, with whom he held several conversations on the subject of a commercial intercourse between the two nations, the result of which was, that the plan of an eventual commercial treaty was sketched out, as one which might thereafter be concluded between them. This paper had received the approbation of the Pensionary Van Berkel, and of the city of Amsterdam, but not of the States General.

While Mr. Lee, one of the ministers of the United States, was on a mission to the courts of Vienna and Berlin, he met a Mr. John de Neufwille, a merchant from Amsterdam. They had several discussions about establishing a commercial relationship between the two nations, and as a result, they outlined a plan for a potential commercial treaty that could be finalized later. This proposal had the approval of the Pensionary Van Berkel and the city of Amsterdam, but not of the States General.

Mr. Henry Laurens, late president of congress, was deputed to the States General with this plan of a treaty, for the double purpose of endeavouring to complete it, and of negotiating a loan for the use of his government. On the voyage he was captured by a British frigate; and his papers, which he had thrown overboard, were rescued from the waves by a British sailor. Among them was found the plan of a treaty which has been mentioned, and which was immediately transmitted to Sir Joseph Yorke, the British minister at the Hague, to be laid before the government.

Mr. Henry Laurens, the former president of Congress, was sent to the States General with this treaty proposal, aiming both to finalize it and to negotiate a loan for his government. During the trip, he was captured by a British frigate; however, the papers he had thrown overboard were recovered from the sea by a British sailor. Among those papers was the treaty proposal mentioned earlier, which was quickly sent to Sir Joseph Yorke, the British minister in The Hague, to present to the government.

The explanations of this transaction not being deemed satisfactory by the court of London, Sir Joseph Yorke received orders to withdraw from the Hague, soon after which war was proclaimed against Holland.[Pg 287]

The court in London found the explanations for this transaction unsatisfactory, so Sir Joseph Yorke was ordered to leave the Hague, shortly after which war was declared against Holland.[Pg 287]

This bold measure, which added one of the first maritime powers in Europe to the formidable list of enemies with whom Britain was already encompassed, was perhaps, not less prudent than courageous.

This bold move, which added one of the first maritime powers in Europe to the long list of enemies Britain already faced, was perhaps just as wise as it was brave.

There are situations, to which only high minded nations are equal, in which a daring policy will conduct those who adopt it, safely through the very dangers it appears to invite; dangers which a system suggested by a timid caution might multiply instead of avoiding. The present was, probably, one of those situations. Holland was about to become a member of the armed neutrality, after which her immense navigation would be employed, unmolested, in transporting the property of the enemies of Britain, and in supplying them with all the materials for shipbuilding, or the whole confederacy must be encountered.

There are situations only noble nations can handle, where a bold policy can guide those who embrace it safely through the very dangers it seems to invite; dangers that a cautious approach might actually increase instead of prevent. The present moment was likely one of those situations. Holland was about to join the armed neutrality, after which its vast shipping would be free to transport the property of Britain’s enemies and provide them with everything they needed for shipbuilding, or the entire confederacy would have to be faced.

America, however, received with delight the intelligence that Holland also was engaged in the war; and founded additional hopes of its speedy termination on that event.

America, however, welcomed the news that Holland was also involved in the war and built additional hopes for its quick end on that development.


CHAPTER IX.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia.... Defeat of Ferguson.... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina.... Retreats out of that state.... Major Wemyss defeated by Sumpter.... Tarlton repulsed.... Greene appointed to the command of the Southern army.... Arrives in camp.... Detaches Morgan over the Catawba.... Battle of the Cowpens.... Lord Cornwallis drives Greene through North Carolina into Virginia.... He retires to Hillsborough.... Greene recrosses the Dan.... Loyalists under Colonel Pyle cut to pieces.... Battle of Guilford.... Lord Cornwallis retires to Ramsay's mills.... To Wilmington.... Greene advances to Ramsay's mills.... Determines to enter South Carolina.... Lord Cornwallis resolves to march to Virginia.

Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia.... Defeat of Ferguson.... Lord Cornwallis enters North Carolina.... Retreats out of that state.... Major Wemyss defeated by Sumpter.... Tarleton repulsed.... Greene appointed to lead the Southern army.... Arrives in camp.... Sends Morgan across the Catawba.... Battle of the Cowpens.... Lord Cornwallis drives Greene through North Carolina into Virginia.... He withdraws to Hillsborough.... Greene crosses back over the Dan.... Loyalists under Colonel Pyle are annihilated.... Battle of Guilford.... Lord Cornwallis retires to Ramsay's mills.... Then to Wilmington.... Greene advances to Ramsay's mills.... Decides to enter South Carolina.... Lord Cornwallis resolves to march to Virginia.

 

1780.

In the South, Lord Cornwallis, after having nearly demolished the American army at Camden, found himself under the necessity of suspending, for a few weeks, the new career of conquest on which he had intended to enter. His army was enfeebled by sickness as well as by action; the weather was intensely hot, and the stores necessary for an expedition into North Carolina had not been brought from Charleston. Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia.In addition, a temper so hostile to the British interests had lately appeared in South Carolina as to make it unsafe to withdraw any considerable part of his force from that state, until he should subdue the spirit of insurrection against his authority. Exertions were made in other[Pg 289] parts of the state, not inferior to those of Sumpter in the north-west. Colonel Marion, who had been compelled by the wounds he received in Charleston to retire into the country, had been promoted by Governor Rutledge to the rank of a brigadier general. As the army of Gates approached South Carolina, he had entered the north-eastern parts of that state with only sixteen men; had penetrated into the country as far as the Santee; and was successfully rousing the well-affected inhabitants to arms, when the defeat of the 16th of August chilled the growing spirit of resistance which he had contributed to increase.

In the South, Lord Cornwallis, after nearly wiping out the American army at Camden, had to pause for a few weeks on his new plan for conquest. His army was weakened by illness as well as battle; the weather was extremely hot, and the supplies needed for an expedition into North Carolina hadn't been brought over from Charleston. Transactions in South Carolina and Georgia. On top of that, there was a recently hostile attitude towards British interests in South Carolina, making it risky to withdraw any significant part of his forces from that state until he could crush the uprising against his authority. Efforts were being made in other[Pg 289] parts of the state that were on par with those of Sumpter in the northwest. Colonel Marion, who had to retreat into the countryside due to injuries he sustained in Charleston, was promoted by Governor Rutledge to the rank of brigadier general. As Gates' army approached South Carolina, he had entered the northeastern regions of the state with only sixteen men; he went as far as the Santee and was successfully rallying the supportive locals to arms when the defeat on August 16th dampened the growing spirit of resistance he had helped inspire.

With the force he had collected, he rescued about one hundred and fifty continental troops who had been captured at Camden, and were on their way to Charleston. Though compelled, for a short time, to leave the state, he soon returned to it, and at the head of a few spirited men, made repeated excursions from the swamps and marshes in which he concealed himself, and skirmished successfully with the militia who had joined the British standard, and the small parties of regulars by whom they were occasionally supported.

With the support he gathered, he rescued around one hundred and fifty Continental soldiers who had been captured at Camden and were on their way to Charleston. Although he had to temporarily leave the state, he returned quickly and, leading a small group of determined men, frequently made surprise attacks from the swamps and marshes where he was hiding, successfully skirmishing with the militia that had allied with the British and the small units of regular soldiers that occasionally backed them up.

His talents as a partisan, added to his knowledge of the country, enabled him to elude every attempt to seize him; and such was his humanity as well as respect for the laws, that no violence[Pg 290] or outrage was ever attributed to the party under his command.

His skills as a guerrilla fighter, combined with his understanding of the land, allowed him to avoid every attempt to capture him; and because of his compassion and respect for the law, no violence[Pg 290] or atrocities were ever linked to the group he led.

The interval between the victory of the 16th of August, and the expedition into North Carolina, was employed in quelling what was termed the spirit of revolt in South Carolina. The efforts of the people to recover their independence were considered as new acts of rebellion, and were met with a degree of severity which policy was supposed to dictate, but which gave a keener edge to the resentments which civil discord never fails to engender. Several of the most active militia men who had taken protections as British subjects, and entered into the British militia, having been afterwards found in arms, and made prisoners at Camden, were executed as traitors. Orders were given to officers commanding at different posts to proceed in the same manner against persons of a similar description; and these orders were, in many instances, carried into execution. A proclamation was issued for sequestering the estates of all those inhabitants of the province, not included in the capitulation of Charleston, who were in the service, or acting under the authority of Congress, and of all those who, by an open avowal of what were termed rebellious principles, or by other notorious acts should manifest a wicked and desperate perseverance in opposing the re-establishment of royal authority.[50]

The time between the victory on August 16 and the mission into North Carolina was spent trying to suppress what was called the spirit of revolt in South Carolina. The people's attempts to regain their independence were viewed as new acts of rebellion and were met with a level of harshness that was said to be politically motivated, but only intensified the anger that civil conflict inevitably fuels. Many of the most active militia members who had claimed protection as British subjects and joined the British militia were later found fighting and captured at Camden, and they were executed as traitors. Orders were given to officers in charge at various posts to act similarly against those in a like situation; these orders were often carried out. A proclamation was issued to seize the estates of all residents of the province not included in the capitulation of Charleston who were serving or acting under Congress's authority, as well as those who openly expressed what were considered rebellious views or took other obvious actions demonstrating a wicked and desperate determination to oppose the restoration of royal authority.[50]

While taking these measures to break the spirit of independence, Lord Cornwallis was indefatigable in urging his preparations for the expedition into North Carolina.

While taking these steps to crush the spirit of independence, Lord Cornwallis was relentless in pushing his plans for the expedition into North Carolina.

The day after the battle near Camden, emissaries had been despatched into that state for the purpose of inviting the friends of the British government to take up arms. Meanwhile the utmost exertions were continued to embody the people of the country as a British militia; and Major Ferguson was employed in the district of Ninety Six, to train the most loyal inhabitants, and to attach them to his own corps.[51] After being employed for some time in Ninety Six, he was directed to enter the western parts of North Carolina, for the purpose of embodying the royalists in that quarter.

The day after the battle near Camden, messengers were sent into that state to invite supporters of the British government to take up arms. At the same time, efforts were made to organize the local population into a British militia, and Major Ferguson was tasked with training the most loyal residents in the Ninety Six area and incorporating them into his unit.[51] After working in Ninety Six for a while, he was ordered to head into the western parts of North Carolina to rally the royalists there.

The route marked out for the main army was from Camden, through the settlement of the Waxhaws to Charlottestown, in North Carolina. On the 8th of September Lord Cornwallis moved from Camden, and reached Charlotte late in that month, where he expected to be joined by Ferguson. But in attempting to meet him, Ferguson was arrested by an event as important as it was unexpected.

The path planned for the main army was from Camden, through the Waxhaws settlement to Charlotte, North Carolina. On September 8th, Lord Cornwallis left Camden and arrived in Charlotte later that month, where he anticipated reuniting with Ferguson. However, while trying to meet him, Ferguson was stopped by a significant and unforeseen event.

Colonel Clarke, a refugee from Georgia, had formed a plan for the reduction of Augusta, which was defended only by a few provincials, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel[Pg 292] Brown. September.About the time Lord Cornwallis commenced his march from Camden, Clarke advanced against Augusta, at the head of a body of irregulars whom he had collected in the frontiers of North and South Carolina, and invested that place. Brown made a vigorous defence; and the approach of Lieutenant Colonel Cruger with a reinforcement from Ninety Six, compelled Clarke to relinquish the enterprise, and to save himself by a rapid retreat. Intelligence of the transactions at Augusta was given to Ferguson, who, to favour the design of intercepting Clarke, moved nearer the mountains, and remained longer in that country than had been intended. This delay proved fatal to him. It gave an opportunity to several volunteer corps to unite, and to constitute a formidable force. The hardy mountaineers inhabiting the extreme western parts of Virginia and North Carolina, assembled on horseback with their rifles, under Colonels Campbell, M'Dowell, Cleveland, Shelby, and Sevier, and moved with their accustomed velocity towards Ferguson. On receiving notice of their approach, that officer commenced his march for Charlotte, despatching, at the same time, different messengers to Lord Cornwallis with information of his danger. These messengers being intercepted, no movement was made to favour his retreat.

Colonel Clarke, a refugee from Georgia, had come up with a plan to take Augusta, which was only defended by a few local troops under Lieutenant Colonel[Pg 292] Brown. September. Just as Lord Cornwallis began his march from Camden, Clarke moved against Augusta, leading a group of irregulars he had gathered on the borders of North and South Carolina, and surrounded the town. Brown put up a strong defense, and the arrival of Lieutenant Colonel Cruger with reinforcements from Ninety Six forced Clarke to abandon the mission and make a quick escape. Ferguson was informed about the events in Augusta, and to support the plan to intercept Clarke, he moved closer to the mountains and stayed in the area longer than planned. This delay turned out to be disastrous for him. It allowed several volunteer units to come together and form a strong force. The tough mountaineers from the far western parts of Virginia and North Carolina gathered on horseback with their rifles, led by Colonels Campbell, M'Dowell, Cleveland, Shelby, and Sevier, and moved swiftly towards Ferguson. Upon learning of their approach, he started his march toward Charlotte while sending different messengers to Lord Cornwallis to warn him of his danger. These messengers were intercepted, and no support was sent for his retreat.

When within about sixteen miles of Gilbert-town, where Ferguson was then supposed to lie,[Pg 293] Colonel M'Dowell deputed to Gates with a request that he would appoint a general officer to command them; and, in the mean time, Colonel Campbell of Virginia was chosen for that purpose. On reaching Gilbert-town, and finding that the British had commenced their retreat, it was determined to follow them with the utmost celerity. At the Cowpens, this party was joined by Colonels Williams, Tracy, and Branan, of South Carolina, with about four hundred men, who also gave information respecting the distance and situation of their enemy. About nine hundred choice men were selected, by whom the pursuit was continued through the night, and through a heavy rain; and, the next day, about three in the afternoon, they came within view of Ferguson, who, finding that he must be overtaken, had determined to await the attack on King's mountain, and was encamped on its summit,—a ridge five or six hundred yards long, and sixty or seventy wide.

When they were about sixteen miles from Gilbert-town, where Ferguson was believed to be,[Pg 293] Colonel M'Dowell sent a message to Gates asking him to appoint a general officer to lead them; in the meantime, Colonel Campbell from Virginia was chosen for that role. Upon reaching Gilbert-town and discovering that the British had started their retreat, they decided to pursue them as quickly as possible. At the Cowpens, they were joined by Colonels Williams, Tracy, and Branan from South Carolina, along with about four hundred men, who also provided information about the enemy's distance and location. They selected about nine hundred top-quality men to continue the pursuit throughout the night, even in heavy rain. The next day, around three in the afternoon, they spotted Ferguson, who realized he was going to be caught and had decided to prepare for the battle on King's mountain. He was camped at the top of it—a ridge about five or six hundred yards long and sixty or seventy yards wide.

October 7.

The Americans, who had arranged themselves into three columns, the right commanded by Colonel Sevier and Major Winston, the centre by Colonels Campbell and Shelby, and the left by Colonels Cleveland and Williams, immediately rushed to the assault. The attack was commenced by the centre, while the two wings gained the flanks of the British line; and, in about five minutes, the action became general. Ferguson made several impetuous charges with[Pg 294] the bayonet, which, against riflemen, were necessarily successful. But, before any one of them could completely disperse the corps against which it was directed, the heavy and destructive fire of the others, who pressed him on all sides, called off his attention to other quarters, and the broken corps was rallied, and brought back to the attack.

The Americans, who had organized into three columns—the right led by Colonel Sevier and Major Winston, the center by Colonels Campbell and Shelby, and the left by Colonels Cleveland and Williams—quickly charged into battle. The attack began with the center, while the two wings moved to flank the British line; within about five minutes, the fighting became intense. Ferguson launched several aggressive bayonet charges, which were effective against riflemen. However, before any of these charges could completely scatter the unit they targeted, the heavy and destructive fire from the others surrounding him diverted his attention to different areas, allowing the scattered unit to regroup and return to the fight.

In the course of these successive repulses, the right and centre had become intermingled, and were both, by one furious charge of the bayonet, driven almost to the foot of the mountain. With some difficulty they were rallied and again brought into the action; upon which the British, in turn, gave way, and were driven along the summit of the ridge, on Cleveland and Williams, who still maintained their ground on the left. Defeat of Ferguson.In this critical state of the action, Ferguson received a mortal wound, and instantly expired. The courage of his party fell with him, and quarter was immediately demanded.[52] The action continued rather more than an hour.

During these repeated setbacks, the right and center became mixed up and were both pushed almost to the bottom of the mountain by a fierce bayonet charge. After some difficulty, they were regrouped and brought back into the fight; at which point the British retreated and were pushed along the ridge, except for Cleveland and Williams, who still held their ground on the left. Ferguson defeated. In this critical moment of the battle, Ferguson was mortally wounded and died instantly. The morale of his group collapsed with him, and they immediately asked for quarter.[52] The battle continued for just over an hour.

In this sharp action one hundred and fifty of Ferguson's party were killed on the spot, and about the same number were wounded. Eight hundred and ten, of whom one hundred were British troops, were made prisoners, and fifteen hundred stand of excellent arms were taken.[Pg 295]

In this fierce battle, one hundred and fifty of Ferguson's group were killed immediately, and around the same number were injured. Eight hundred and ten people, including one hundred British soldiers, were captured, and fifteen hundred high-quality weapons were seized.[Pg 295]

The Americans fought under cover of trees, and their loss was inconsiderable; but among the slain was Colonel Williams, who was greatly and justly lamented. As cruelty generally begets cruelty, the example set by the British at Camden was followed, and ten of the most active of the royalists were selected from the prisoners, and hung upon the spot. The victorious mountaineers, having accomplished the object for which they assembled, returned to their homes.

The Americans fought beneath the trees, and their losses were minimal; however, among the dead was Colonel Williams, who was deeply and rightfully mourned. As cruelty often leads to more cruelty, the British actions at Camden were replicated, and ten of the most active loyalists were chosen from the prisoners and hanged on the spot. The victorious mountain fighters, having achieved the goal for which they gathered, returned to their homes.

Lord Cornwallis retreats out of North Carolina.

The destruction of this party arrested the progress of Lord Cornwallis in North Carolina, and inspired serious fears for the posts in his rear. He retreated to Wynnsborough, between Camden and Ninety Six, where he waited for reinforcements from New York.

The destruction of this party halted Lord Cornwallis's advance in North Carolina and raised significant concerns for the posts behind him. He pulled back to Wynnsborough, located between Camden and Ninety Six, where he waited for reinforcements from New York.

The victory obtained on the 16th of August having suggested views of more extensive conquest in the south, Sir Henry Clinton had determined to send a large reinforcement to the southern army. In the opinion that Lord Cornwallis could meet with no effectual resistance in the Carolinas, he had ordered the officer commanding this reinforcement to enter the Chesapeake in the first instance, and to take possession of the lower parts of Virginia, after which he was to obey the orders he should receive from Lord Cornwallis, to whom a copy of his instructions had been forwarded.

The victory achieved on August 16th sparked ideas for broader conquest in the south. Sir Henry Clinton decided to send a significant reinforcement to the southern army. Believing that Lord Cornwallis would face no effective resistance in the Carolinas, he instructed the officer leading this reinforcement to first enter the Chesapeake and secure the lower regions of Virginia. After that, the officer was to follow whatever orders he received from Lord Cornwallis, to whom a copy of his instructions had been sent.

The detachment amounted to near three thousand men, under the command of General Les[Pg 296]lie. It sailed on the 6th of October, and, entering James River after a short passage, took possession of the country on the south side as high as Suffolk. After a short time, Leslie drew in his out-posts, and began to fortify Portsmouth. At this place he received orders from Lord Cornwallis to repair to Charleston by water.

The detachment consisted of nearly three thousand men, led by General Leslie. It set sail on October 6th, and after a brief journey, entered the James River and occupied the area on the south side up to Suffolk. Soon after, Leslie pulled back his outposts and started to fortify Portsmouth. While there, he received orders from Lord Cornwallis to head to Charleston by boat.

While Cornwallis waited at Wynnsborough for this reinforcement, the light corps of his army were employed in suppressing the parties which were rising in various quarters of the country, in opposition to his authority. Marion had become so formidable as to endanger the communication between Camden and Charleston. Tarlton was detached against him, and Marion was under the necessity of concealing himself in the swamps. From the unavailing pursuit of him through marshes which were scarcely penetrable, Tarlton was called to a different quarter, where an enemy supposed to be entirely vanquished, had reappeared in considerable force.

While Cornwallis was waiting at Wynnsborough for reinforcements, the light troops of his army were busy dealing with the groups rising up in various parts of the country against his authority. Marion had become such a threat that he jeopardized the communication between Camden and Charleston. Tarlton was sent to take action against him, forcing Marion to hide in the swamps. After a frustrating chase through almost impassable marshes, Tarlton was redirected to another area, where an enemy thought to be completely defeated had reemerged in significant strength.

Sumpter had again assembled a respectable body of mounted militia, at the head of which he advanced towards the posts occupied by the British. On receiving intelligence of his approach, Earl Cornwallis formed a plan for surprising him in his camp on Broad River, the execution of which was committed to Major Wemyss. That officer marched from Wynnsborough at the head of a regiment of infantry[Pg 297] and about forty dragoons, reached the camp of Sumpter several hours before day, and immediately charged the out piquet, which made but a slight resistance. Major Wemyss attacks and is defeated by Sumpter.Only five shots are said to have been fired, but from these Wemyss received two dangerous wounds which disabled him from the performance of his duty. The assailants fell into confusion, and were repulsed with the loss of their commanding officer and about twenty men. After this action, Sumpter crossed Broad River, and, having formed a junction with Clarke and Branan, threatened Ninety Six.

Sumpter had once again gathered a solid group of mounted militia and moved toward the positions held by the British. When Earl Cornwallis learned of his advance, he devised a plan to surprise Sumpter in his camp on Broad River, assigning Major Wemyss to carry it out. That officer marched from Wynnsborough at the front of a regiment of infantry[Pg 297] and about forty dragoons, reaching Sumpter's camp several hours before dawn. He immediately attacked the outpost, which put up only a minimal resistance. Major Wemyss attacks and is defeated by Sumpter. Only five shots were reportedly fired, but they left Wemyss with two serious wounds that incapacitated him for duty. The attackers became disorganized and were forced to retreat, losing their commanding officer and around twenty men. Following this confrontation, Sumpter crossed Broad River and, after joining forces with Clarke and Branan, threatened Ninety Six.

Alarmed for the safety of that post, Earl Cornwallis recalled Tarlton, and ordered him to proceed against Sumpter. So rapid was his movement that he had nearly gained the rear of his enemy before notice of his return was received. In the night preceding the day on which he expected to effect his purpose, a deserter apprised Sumpter of the approaching danger, and that officer began his retreat. Tarlton, pursuing with his usual rapidity, overtook the rear guard at the ford of the Ennoree, and cut it to pieces; after which, fearing that Sumpter would save himself by passing the Tyger, he pressed forward, with, as he states, about two hundred and eighty cavalry and mounted infantry, and, in the afternoon, came within view of the Americans, who were arranged in order for battle.

Worried about the safety of that post, Earl Cornwallis called back Tarlton and ordered him to go after Sumpter. He moved so quickly that he was almost behind his enemy before anyone realized he was returning. The night before he planned to achieve his goal, a deserter warned Sumpter about the upcoming danger, prompting Sumpter to start his retreat. Tarlton, known for his speed, caught up with the rear guard at the Ennoree ford and destroyed it. After that, fearing Sumpter might escape by crossing the Tyger, he pressed on with about two hundred and eighty cavalry and mounted infantry, and in the afternoon, he spotted the Americans set up for battle.

Sumpter had reached the banks of the Tyger, when the firing of his videttes announced the[Pg 298] approach of his enemy. He immediately posted his troops to great advantage on a steep eminence, having their rear and part of their right flank secured by the river, and their left covered by a barn of logs, into which a considerable number of his men were thrown.

Sumpter had arrived at the banks of the Tyger when the sounds of his lookout's gunfire signaled the approach of his enemy. He quickly arranged his troops advantageously on a steep hill, with their backs and part of their right side protected by the river, and their left shielded by a log barn, into which a significant number of his men were placed.

Tarlton, without waiting for his infantry, or for a field piece left with them in his rear, rushed to the charge with his usual impetuosity. After several ineffectual attempts to dislodge the Americans, he retired from the field with great precipitation and disorder, leaving ninety-two dead, and one hundred wounded.

Tarlton, without waiting for his infantry or the artillery left behind, charged forward with his usual impulsiveness. After several unsuccessful tries to push the Americans back, he quickly retreated from the battlefield in a state of panic and disorder, leaving behind ninety-two dead and one hundred wounded.

After remaining in possession of the ground for a few hours, Sumpter, who was severely wounded in the action, crossed the Tyger, after which his troops dispersed. His loss was only three killed, and four wounded.

After holding the ground for a few hours, Sumpter, who was seriously injured in the battle, crossed the Tyger, after which his troops scattered. He only had three killed and four wounded.

Availing himself of the subsequent retreat and dispersion of the American militia, Tarlton denominated this severe check a victory; while congress, in a public resolution, voted their thanks to General Sumpter and the militia he commanded, for this and other services which had been previously rendered.

Taking advantage of the American militia's retreat and scattering, Tarlton called this heavy defeat a victory; meanwhile, Congress publicly expressed their gratitude to General Sumpter and the militia he led for this and other services they had previously provided.

The shattered remains of the army defeated near Camden, had been slowly collected at Hillsborough, and great exertions were made to reorganize and reinforce it. The whole number of continental troops in the southern army amounted to about fourteen hundred men.[Pg 299]

The broken remnants of the army defeated near Camden had been gradually gathered at Hillsborough, and significant efforts were made to reorganize and strengthen it. The total number of Continental troops in the Southern army was around fourteen hundred men.[Pg 299]

On receiving intelligence that Lord Cornwallis had occupied Charlotte, Gates detached Smallwood to the Yadkin, with directions to post himself at the ford of that river, and to take command of all the troops in that quarter of the country. The more effectually to harass the enemy, a light corps was selected from the army and placed under the command of Morgan, now a brigadier general.

On learning that Lord Cornwallis had taken over Charlotte, Gates sent Smallwood to the Yadkin, instructing him to set up at the river's ford and take charge of all the troops in that area. To better disturb the enemy, a light unit was chosen from the army and put under the command of Morgan, who was now a brigadier general.

As Lord Cornwallis retreated, Gates advanced to Charlotte, Smallwood encamped lower down the Catawba on the road to Camden; and Morgan was pushed forward some distance in his front. In the expectation that farther active operations would be postponed until the spring, Gates intended to pass the winter in this position. Such was the arrangement of the troops when their general was removed.

As Lord Cornwallis pulled back, Gates moved forward to Charlotte, Smallwood set up camp further down the Catawba on the road to Camden, and Morgan was sent ahead a bit in front of him. Thinking that any further action would be delayed until spring, Gates planned to spend the winter in this spot. This was the situation of the troops when their general was replaced.

November 5.

On the 5th of November, without any previous indications of dissatisfaction, congress passed a resolution requiring the Commander-in-chief to order a court of inquiry on the conduct of General Gates as commander of the southern army, and to appoint some other officer to that command, until the inquiry should be made.

On November 5th, with no prior signs of discontent, Congress passed a resolution instructing the Commander-in-Chief to initiate a court of inquiry into General Gates' actions as the commander of the southern army, and to appoint another officer to that position until the inquiry was completed.

Greene appointed to the command of the southern army.

Washington, without hesitation, selected Greene for that important and difficult service. In a letter to congress recommending him to their support, he mentioned General Greene as "an officer in whose abilities, fortitude, and integrity, from a long and intimate experience of[Pg 300] them, he had the most entire confidence." To Mr. Matthews, a delegate from South Carolina, he said, "You have your wish in the officer appointed to the southern command. I think I am giving you a general; but what can a general do without men, without arms, without clothing, without stores, without provisions?" About the same time the legion of Lee was ordered into South Carolina.

Washington quickly chose Greene for that important and challenging role. In a letter to Congress recommending him for their support, he described General Greene as "an officer in whose abilities, determination, and honesty, from a long and close experience of[Pg 300] them, he had complete confidence." To Mr. Matthews, a delegate from South Carolina, he said, "You got what you wanted in the officer appointed to the southern command. I believe I’m giving you a general; but what can a general do without soldiers, without weapons, without uniforms, without supplies, without food?" Around the same time, Lee's legion was sent to South Carolina.

Arrives in camp.

Greene hastened to the army he was to command; and, on the second of December, reached Charlotte, then its head quarters. Soon after his arrival in camp, he was gratified with the intelligence of a small piece of good fortune obtained by the address of Lieutenant Colonel Washington.

Greene hurried to the army he was supposed to lead, and on December 2, he arrived in Charlotte, which was then the headquarters. Shortly after he got to camp, he was pleased to hear about a small bit of good luck achieved through the efforts of Lieutenant Colonel Washington.

Smallwood, having received information that a body of royal militia had entered the country in which he foraged, for the purpose of intercepting his wagons, detached Morgan and Washington against them. Intelligence of Morgan's approach being received, the party retreated; but Colonel Washington, being able to move with more celerity than the infantry, resolved to make an attempt on another party, which was stationed at Rugely's farm, within thirteen miles of Camden. He found them posted in a logged barn, strongly secured by abattis, and inaccessible to cavalry. Force being of no avail, he resorted to the following stratagem. Having painted the trunk of a pine, and mounted it on[Pg 301] a carriage so as to resemble a field piece, he paraded it in front of the enemy, and demanded a surrender. The whole party, consisting of one hundred and twelve men, with Colonel Rugely at their head, alarmed at the prospect of a cannonade, surrendered themselves prisoners of war.[53]

Smallwood, having learned that a group of royal militia had entered the area where he was foraging to intercept his wagons, sent Morgan and Washington to confront them. When the militia heard that Morgan was approaching, they retreated; however, Colonel Washington, able to move faster than the infantry, decided to target another group stationed at Rugely's farm, just thirteen miles from Camden. He discovered them holed up in a logged barn, well-protected by obstacles and unreachable by cavalry. Since brute force wouldn't work, he came up with a clever plan. He painted the trunk of a pine tree, mounted it on a carriage to make it look like a cannon, and displayed it in front of the enemy, demanding their surrender. The entire group, made up of one hundred and twelve men led by Colonel Rugely, panicked at the thought of an artillery attack and surrendered as prisoners of war.[Pg 301][53]

Detaches Morgan over the Catawba.

To narrow the limits of the British army, and to encourage the inhabitants, Greene detached Morgan west of the Catawba, with orders to take a position near the confluence of the Pacolet with the Broad River. His party consisted of rather more than three hundred chosen continental troops, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Howard, of Maryland, of Washington's regiment of light dragoons, amounting to about eighty men, and of two companies of militia from the northern and western parts of Virginia commanded by Captains Triplet and Taite, which were composed almost entirely of old continental soldiers. He was also to be joined on Broad River by seven or eight hundred volunteers and militia commanded by General Davidson, and by Colonels Clarke and Few.

To limit the British army's movements and boost the morale of the locals, Greene sent Morgan west of the Catawba, directing him to set up near where the Pacolet meets the Broad River. Morgan's group included just over three hundred select Continental troops led by Lieutenant Colonel Howard from Maryland, alongside about eighty men from Washington's light dragoons regiment. Additionally, he had two companies of militia from the northern and western regions of Virginia, led by Captains Triplet and Taite, made up mostly of former Continental soldiers. He was also set to meet up on the Broad River with seven or eight hundred volunteers and militia led by General Davidson, along with Colonels Clarke and Few.

After making this detachment, Greene, for the purpose of entering a more plentiful country, advanced lower down the Pedee, and encamped on its east side, opposite the Cheraw hills. Lord Cornwallis remained at Wynnsborough, pre[Pg 302]paring to commence active operations, so soon as he should be joined by Leslie.

After separating this group, Greene, aiming to enter a more resource-rich area, moved further down the Pedee and set up camp on its east side, across from the Cheraw hills. Lord Cornwallis stayed at Wynnsborough, preparing to start active operations as soon as Leslie joined him.

The position he occupied on the Pedee was about seventy miles from Wynnsborough, and towards the north of east from that place. The detachment commanded by Morgan had taken post at Grindal's ford on the Pacolet, one of the south forks of Broad River, not quite fifty miles north-west of Wynnsborough. The active courage of his troops, and the enterprising temper of their commander, rendered him extremely formidable to the parties of royal militia who were embodying in that quarter of the country.

The position he held on the Pedee was about seventy miles from Wynnsborough, heading northeast from there. The group led by Morgan had set up at Grindal's Ford on the Pacolet, one of the southern branches of Broad River, not far from fifty miles northwest of Wynnsborough. The bravery of his troops and the adventurous spirit of their leader made him very threatening to the royal militia groups that were gathering in that area of the country.

Supposing Morgan to have designs on Ninety Six, Lord Cornwallis detached Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton with his legion, part of two regiments of infantry, and a corps of artillery with two field pieces, consisting altogether of about one thousand men, across the Broad River, to cover that important post. As he lay between Greene and Morgan, he was desirous of preventing their junction, and of striking at one of them while unsupported by the other. To leave it uncertain against which division his first effort would be directed, he ordered Leslie to halt at Camden until the preparations for entering North Carolina should be completed. Having determined to penetrate into that state by the upper route, he put his army in motion and directed his course northwestward, between the Catawba and Broad Rivers. Leslie was directed[Pg 303] to move up the banks of the former, and to join him on the march; and Tarlton was ordered to strike at Morgan. Should that officer escape Tarlton, the hope was entertained that he might be intercepted by the main army.[54]

Assuming Morgan was planning something at Ninety Six, Lord Cornwallis sent Lieutenant Colonel Tarleton with his legion, parts of two infantry regiments, and an artillery unit with two field pieces, totaling about a thousand men, across the Broad River to secure that key location. Positioned between Greene and Morgan, he aimed to prevent their meeting and to attack one of them while the other remained unsupported. To keep it unclear which group he would target first, he ordered Leslie to stay at Camden until preparations for entering North Carolina were finished. Deciding to advance into that state via the upper route, he moved his army north-northwest, between the Catawba and Broad Rivers. Leslie was instructed[Pg 303] to go up the banks of the Catawba and join him on the march, while Tarleton was ordered to engage Morgan. If Morgan managed to evade Tarleton, there was hope that the main army could intercept him.[54]

High waters delayed Cornwallis and Leslie longer than had been expected; but Tarlton overcame the same obstacles, and reached Morgan before a correspondent progress was made by the other divisions.[55]

High waters kept Cornwallis and Leslie delayed longer than expected; however, Tarleton managed to get past the same challenges and reached Morgan before the other divisions made significant progress.[55]

1781 January 14.

The combined movements of the British army were communicated to General Morgan on the 14th of January. Perceiving the insecurity of his own position, he retired across the Pacolet, the fords over which he was desirous of defending. But a passage of that river being effected at a ford about six miles below him, he made a precipitate retreat; and, on the evening of the same day, his pursuers occupied the camp he had abandoned. Morgan retired to the Cowpens, where he determined to risk a battle. Sixteenth.It was believed that he might have crossed the Broad River, or have reached a mountainous country which was also near him, before he could have been overtaken; and the superiority of his adversary was so decided as to induce his best officers to think that every effort ought to be made to avoid an engagement. But Morgan had great and just confidence in himself and in his troops; he was unwilling to fly from an enemy[Pg 304] not so decidedly his superior as to render it madness to fight him; and he also thought that, if he should be overtaken while his men were fatigued and retreating, the probability of success would be much less than if he should exhibit the appearance of fighting from choice.

The combined movements of the British army were reported to General Morgan on January 14th. Realizing the weakness of his own position, he retreated across the Pacolet, the fords he wanted to defend. However, a crossing of that river occurred at a ford about six miles below him, prompting a hasty retreat; by the evening of the same day, his pursuers had taken over the camp he had left behind. Morgan pulled back to the Cowpens, where he decided to risk a battle. 16th. It was thought that he could have crossed the Broad River or reached nearby mountainous terrain before he could be caught; and the strength of his opponents was so significant that his best officers believed they should do everything possible to avoid combat. But Morgan had strong faith in himself and in his troops; he was reluctant to flee from an enemy[Pg 304] who wasn't overwhelmingly superior, making it unwise to fight them; and he also felt that if he were caught while his men were tired and retreating, their chances of success would be much lower than if he appeared to be choosing to fight.

These considerations determined him to halt earlier than was absolutely necessary.[56]

These thoughts made him decide to stop sooner than he really had to.[56]

Battle of the Cowpens.

Tarlton, having left his baggage under a strong guard, with orders not to move until break of day, recommenced the pursuit at three in the morning.

Tarlton, after leaving his luggage under a strong guard with instructions not to move it until dawn, restarted the chase at three in the morning.

Before day, Morgan was informed of his approach, and prepared to receive him.

Before dawn, Morgan was alerted to his arrival and got ready to greet him.

Although censured by many for having determined to fight, and by some for the ground he chose, all admit the judgment with which his disposition was made.

Although many criticized him for deciding to fight, and some for the ground he selected, everyone recognizes the thoughtfulness behind his decision.

On an eminence, in an open wood, he drew up his continental troops, and Triplet's corps, deemed equal to continentals, amounting to between four and five hundred men, who were commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Howard. In their rear, on the descent of the hill, Lieutenant Colonel Washington was posted with his cavalry, and a small body of mounted Georgia militia commanded by Major M'Call, as a corps de reserve. On these two corps rested his hopes of victory, and with them he remained in person.[Pg 305] The front line was composed entirely of militia, under the command of Colonel Pickens. Major M'Dowell, with a battalion of North Carolina volunteers, and Major Cunningham, with a battalion of Georgia volunteers, were advanced about one hundred and fifty yards in front of this line, with orders to give a single fire as the enemy approached, and then to fall back into the intervals, which were left for them in the centre of the first line. The militia, not being expected to maintain their ground long, were ordered to keep up a retreating fire by regiments, until they should pass the continental troops, on whose right they were directed again to form. His whole force, as stated by himself, amounted to only eight hundred men.

On a raised area in a clearing of the woods, he assembled his continental troops and Triplet's group, which was considered equal to the continentals, numbering between four and five hundred men led by Lieutenant Colonel Howard. Behind them, on the downward slope of the hill, Lieutenant Colonel Washington was stationed with his cavalry and a small unit of mounted Georgia militia commanded by Major M'Call, serving as a reserve force. His hopes for victory rested on these two groups, and he stayed with them personally. The front line was made up entirely of militia, under Colonel Pickens' command. Major M'Dowell, leading a battalion of North Carolina volunteers, and Major Cunningham, with a battalion of Georgia volunteers, were positioned about one hundred and fifty yards in front of this line, instructed to fire once as the enemy approached and then retreat into the spaces left for them in the middle of the first line. The militia, not expected to hold their position for long, were ordered to continue a retreating fire by regiments until they passed the continental troops, where they were then directed to regroup on the right. His entire force, as he reported, totaled only eight hundred men.[Pg 305]

Soon after this disposition was made, the British van appeared in sight. Confident of a cheap victory, Tarlton formed his line of battle, and his troops rushed forward with great impetuosity, shouting as they advanced.

Soon after this arrangement was made, the British van came into view. Confident of an easy victory, Tarleton set up his battle line, and his troops surged forward with great intensity, shouting as they moved ahead.

After a single well directed fire, M'Dowell and Cunningham fell back on Colonel Pickens, who, after a short but warm conflict, retreated into the rear of the second line.[57] The British pressed forward with great eagerness; and, though received by the continental troops with a firmness unimpaired by the rout of the front line, continued to advance. Soon after the action[Pg 306] with the continental troops had commenced, Tarlton ordered up his reserve. Perceiving that the enemy extended beyond him both on the right and left, and that, on the right especially, his flank was on the point of being turned, Howard ordered the company on his right to change its front, so as to face the British on that flank. From some mistake in the officer commanding this company, it fell back, instead of fronting the enemy, upon which the rest of the line, supposing a change of ground for the whole to have been directed, began to retire in perfect order. At this moment General Morgan rode up, and directed the infantry to retreat over the summit of the hill, about one hundred yards to the cavalry. This judicious but hazardous movement was made in good order, and extricated the flanks from immediate danger. Believing the fate of the day to be decided, the British pressed on with increased ardour, and in some disorder; and when the Americans halted, were within thirty yards of them. The orders then given by Howard to face the enemy were executed as soon as they were received; and the whole line poured in a fire as deadly as it was unexpected. Some confusion appearing in the ranks of the enemy, Howard seized the critical moment, and ordered a charge with the bayonet. These orders were instantly obeyed, and the British line was broken.

After a single well-aimed shot, M'Dowell and Cunningham fell back to Colonel Pickens, who retreated into the back of the second line after a brief but intense struggle. The British charged forward eagerly; and although the continental troops stood firm despite the previous line's retreat, they kept advancing. Shortly after the engagement with the continental troops began, Tarleton called up his reserves. Noticing that the enemy was extending beyond him on both sides, particularly on the right where his flank was about to be outflanked, Howard ordered the company on his right to change its front to face the British on that side. Due to some mistake by the officer in charge of that company, it fell back instead of confronting the enemy, prompting the rest of the line, thinking a general withdrawal had been called, to retreat in perfect order. At that moment, General Morgan rode up and instructed the infantry to retreat over the crest of the hill, about one hundred yards to the cavalry. This clever but risky move was executed smoothly and protected the flanks from immediate threat. Believing the battle was already lost, the British pressed on with even more intensity, albeit with some disarray; when the Americans paused, the British were only thirty yards away. The orders given by Howard to face the enemy were carried out as soon as they were received, and the entire line unleashed a volley that was as deadly as it was surprising. With some confusion breaking out in the enemy's ranks, Howard took advantage of the critical moment and ordered a bayonet charge. These orders were immediately followed, and the British line was shattered.

At the same moment the detachment of cavalry on the British right was routed by Washington. The militia of Pickens, who rode to the ground, had tied their horses in the rear of Howard's left. When the front line was broken, many of them fled to their horses, and were closely pursued by the cavalry, who, while the continental infantry were retiring, passed their flank, and were cutting down the scattered militia in their rear. Washington, who had previously ordered his men not to fire a pistol, now directed them to charge the British cavalry with drawn swords. A sharp conflict ensued, but it was not of long duration. The British were driven from the ground with considerable slaughter, and were closely pursued. Both Howard and Washington pressed the advantage they had respectively gained, until the artillery, and great part of the infantry had surrendered. So sudden was the defeat, that a considerable part of the British cavalry had not been brought into action; and, though retreating, remained unbroken. Washington, followed by Howard with the infantry, pursued them rapidly, and attacked[58] them with great spirit; but, as they[Pg 308] were superior to him in numbers, his cavalry received a temporary check; and in this part of the action he sustained a greater loss than in any other. But the infantry coming up to support him, Tarlton resumed the retreat.[59]

At the same time, the cavalry unit on the British right was defeated by Washington. The militia led by Pickens, who had arrived on horseback, had tied their horses at the back of Howard's left flank. When the front line broke, many of them ran back to their horses and were closely chased by the cavalry, who, while the Continental infantry were falling back, went around them and struck down the scattered militia behind. Washington, who had earlier instructed his men not to fire their pistols, now told them to charge the British cavalry with their swords drawn. A fierce fight broke out, but it didn't last long. The British were forced off the ground with significant casualties and were pursued closely. Both Howard and Washington capitalized on the advantages they had gained until the artillery and a large part of the infantry surrendered. The defeat was so sudden that a significant portion of the British cavalry had yet to engage, and although they were retreating, they remained intact. Washington, followed by Howard and the infantry, chased them quickly and attacked them vigorously; however, because they outnumbered him, his cavalry faced a temporary setback, and during this part of the battle, he suffered more losses than in any other. But with the infantry arriving to back him up, Tarleton continued his retreat.

In this engagement upwards of one hundred British, including ten commissioned officers, were killed; twenty-nine commissioned officers, and five hundred privates were made prisoners. Eight hundred muskets, two field pieces, two standards, thirty-five baggage wagons, and one hundred dragoon horses, fell into the hands of the conquerors.

In this battle, over one hundred British troops, including ten commissioned officers, were killed; twenty-nine commissioned officers and five hundred soldiers were taken prisoner. Eight hundred muskets, two field guns, two flags, thirty-five supply wagons, and one hundred cavalry horses were captured by the victors.

Tarlton retreated towards the headquarters of Lord Cornwallis, then about twenty-five miles from the Cowpens.

Tarlton pulled back toward Lord Cornwallis's headquarters, which was around twenty-five miles from the Cowpens.

This complete victory cost the Americans less than eighty men in killed and wounded.

This decisive victory cost the Americans fewer than eighty men in killed and wounded.

Seldom has a battle in which greater numbers were not engaged, been so important in its consequences as that of the Cowpens. Lord Cornwallis was not only deprived of a fifth of his numbers, but lost a most powerful and active part of his army. Unfortunately, Greene was not in a condition to press the advantage. The whole southern army did not much exceed two[Pg 309] thousand men, a great part of whom were militia.

Seldom has a battle with fewer troops been as significant in its outcomes as the one at Cowpens. Lord Cornwallis not only lost a fifth of his forces but also a key and highly active part of his army. Unfortunately, Greene wasn't able to capitalize on the victory. The entire southern army was barely more than two[Pg 309] thousand men, a large portion of whom were militia.

The camp of Lord Cornwallis at Turkey Creek on the east side of Broad River, was as near as the Cowpens to the fords at which Morgan was to cross the Catawba. Pursuit of the American army through North Carolina into Virginia.Of consequence, that officer had much cause to fear that, encumbered as he was with prisoners and military stores, he might be intercepted before he could pass that river. Comprehending the full extent of his danger, he abandoned the baggage he had taken, and leaving his wounded under the protection of a flag, detached the militia as an escort to his prisoners, and brought up the rear in person with his regulars. Passing Broad River on the evening of the day on which the battle was fought, he hastened to the Catawba, which he crossed on the 23d, at Sherald's ford, and encamped on its eastern bank.

The camp of Lord Cornwallis at Turkey Creek on the east side of the Broad River was as close to the Cowpens as the fords where Morgan was supposed to cross the Catawba. The American army's pursuit through North Carolina into Virginia. Because of this, that officer had good reason to worry that, burdened as he was with prisoners and military supplies, he might get intercepted before he could cross that river. Realizing the seriousness of his situation, he abandoned the baggage he had brought, left his wounded under the protection of a flag, and sent the militia to escort his prisoners while he took up the rear with his regulars. He crossed the Broad River on the evening of the battle and quickly made his way to the Catawba, which he crossed on the 23rd at Sherald's ford, and set up camp on its eastern bank.

January.

Lord Cornwallis employed the 18th in forming a junction with Leslie. Early next morning he put his army in motion, and, on the 25th, reached Ramsay's mills, where the roads taken by the two armies unite. At this place, to accelerate his future movements, he destroyed his baggage; and, after collecting a small supply of provisions, resumed the pursuit. He reached Sherald's ford in the afternoon of the 29th; and, in the night, an immense flood of rain rendered the river impassable.[Pg 310]

Lord Cornwallis sent the 18th to meet up with Leslie. Early the next morning, he got his army moving, and by the 25th, they arrived at Ramsay's mills, where the two armies' routes converged. To speed up his next moves, he destroyed his baggage and, after gathering a small amount of food supplies, continued the chase. He got to Sherald's ford in the afternoon of the 29th, but that night, a heavy downpour made the river impossible to cross.[Pg 310]

January 31.

While Morgan remained on the Catawba, watching the motions of the British army, and endeavouring to collect the militia, General Greene arrived, and took command of the detachment.

While Morgan stayed on the Catawba, observing the movements of the British army and trying to gather the militia, General Greene arrived and took charge of the detachment.

In his camp on the Pedee, opposite the Cheraw hills, Greene had been joined by Lee's legion, amounting to about one hundred cavalry, and one hundred and twenty infantry. The day after his arrival, he was ordered to join Marion for the purpose of attempting to carry a British post at Georgetown, distant about seventy-five miles from the American army. The fort was surprised, but the success was only partial.

In his camp on the Pedee, across from the Cheraw hills, Greene was joined by Lee's legion, which included about one hundred cavalry and one hundred twenty infantry. The day after he arrived, he was ordered to team up with Marion to try to take a British post at Georgetown, located about seventy-five miles from the American army. The fort was caught off guard, but the success was only partial.

On receiving intelligence of the victory at the Cowpens, Greene detached Stevens' brigade of Virginia militia, whose terms of service were on the point of expiring, to conduct the prisoners to Charlottesville in Virginia, and turned his whole attention to the effecting of a junction between the two divisions of his army. It was principally with a view to this object that he hastened to the detachment under Morgan, leaving the other division to be commanded by General Huger.

On hearing about the victory at Cowpens, Greene sent Stevens' brigade of Virginia militia, whose service terms were about to end, to take the prisoners to Charlottesville, Virginia, and focused all his efforts on bringing the two divisions of his army together. He mainly rushed to join the detachment under Morgan, leaving the other division in the hands of General Huger.

February 1.

Early in the morning of the first of February, Lord Cornwallis forced a passage over the Catawba, at a private ford which was defended by General Davidson, with about three hundred North Carolina militia. Davidson was killed, and his troops dispersed. They were followed[Pg 311] by Tarlton, who, hearing in the pursuit, that several bodies of militia were assembling at a tavern about ten miles from the ford, hastened to the place of rendezvous, and charging them with his usual impetuosity, broke their centre, killed some, and dispersed the whole party.

Early in the morning on February 1st, Lord Cornwallis crossed the Catawba River at a private ford defended by General Davidson and about three hundred North Carolina militia. Davidson was killed, and his troops scattered. They were pursued[Pg 311] by Tarleton, who, upon hearing that several groups of militia were gathering at a tavern about ten miles from the ford, rushed to the meeting point. He attacked them with his typical aggression, broke through their center, killed a few, and scattered the entire group.

It was found impracticable to bring the militia into the field, and Huger, who had been directed to march to Salisbury, was ordered to effect a junction between the two divisions of the army at some place farther north.

It was found unfeasible to deploy the militia, and Huger, who had been instructed to head to Salisbury, was ordered to create a connection between the two divisions of the army at a location further north.

Greene retreated along the Salisbury road, and, in the evening of the third, crossed the Yadkin at the trading ford. His passage of the river, then already much swollen by the rain of the preceding day, was facilitated by boats which had been previously collected. The rear guard, which, being impeded by the baggage of the whigs who fled from Salisbury did not cross till midnight, was overtaken by the van of the British army, and a skirmish ensued in which some loss was sustained, but the Americans effected the passage of the river.

Greene pulled back along the Salisbury road and, on the evening of the third, crossed the Yadkin at the trading ford. His crossing of the river, already swollen from the rain the day before, was helped by boats that had been gathered in advance. The rear guard, which was delayed by the baggage of the Whigs fleeing from Salisbury and didn’t cross until midnight, was caught up with by the front of the British army, leading to a skirmish in which they suffered some losses, but the Americans managed to get across the river.

February 3.
Ninth.

The rains having rendered the Yadkin unfordable, and the boats being collected on the opposite side, the pursuit was necessarily suspended; but Greene continued his march to Guilford court house where he was joined by Huger.

The rains made the Yadkin too high to cross, and with the boats gathered on the other side, the pursuit had to be put on hold; however, Greene kept moving towards Guilford courthouse, where he met up with Huger.

After some delay, and apparent hesitation respecting his movements, Lord Cornwallis[Pg 312] marched up the Yadkin, which he crossed near its source on the morning of the eighth.

After some delay and visible uncertainty about his actions, Lord Cornwallis[Pg 312] marched along the Yadkin and crossed it near its source on the morning of the eighth.

After the junction between the divisions of Huger and Morgan, the infantry of the American army, including six hundred militia, amounted to about two thousand effectives; and the cavalry to between two and three hundred. Lord Cornwallis lay twenty-five miles above them at Salem, with an army estimated from twenty-five hundred to three thousand men, including three hundred cavalry. Having failed in his attempt to prevent the junction of the two divisions of the American army, his object was to place himself between Greene and Virginia, and force that officer to a general action before he could be joined by the reinforcements which were known to be preparing for him in that state. His situation favoured the accomplishment of this object.

After the meeting point of Huger and Morgan's divisions, the American army's infantry, which included six hundred militia, reached about two thousand active troops, while the cavalry numbered between two and three hundred. Lord Cornwallis was located twenty-five miles north of them at Salem, commanding an army estimated to be between twenty-five hundred and three thousand men, including three hundred cavalry. After failing to prevent the merging of the two American army divisions, his goal was to position himself between Greene and Virginia, forcing Greene into a general battle before he could be reinforced by troops that were known to be preparing for him in that state. His positioning was favorable for achieving this goal.

Greene, on the other hand, was indefatigable in his exertions to cross the Dan without exposing himself to the hazard of a battle. To effect this object, the whole of his cavalry, with the flower of his infantry, amounting together to rather more than seven hundred men, were formed into a light corps, for the purpose of harassing and impeding the advance of the enemy, until the less active part of his force, with the baggage and military stores should be secured. Morgan being rendered incapable of duty by severe indisposition, the command of[Pg 313] this corps was conferred on Colonels Otho and Williams.

Greene, on the other hand, was tireless in his efforts to cross the Dan without putting himself at risk of battle. To achieve this goal, all his cavalry and the best of his infantry, totaling just over seven hundred men, were organized into a light corps to disrupt and slow the enemy's advance until the less mobile part of his force, along with the baggage and military supplies, could be secured. Since Morgan was unable to perform his duties due to serious illness, the command of[Pg 313] this corps was given to Colonels Otho and Williams.

Lord Cornwallis had been informed that it would be impossible to obtain boats at the ferries on the Dan in sufficient numbers for the transportation of the American troops before he could overtake them. And, as the river could not be forded below, he calculated with confidence on succeeding in his object by keeping above Greene, and prevent his reaching those shallow fords by which alone it was thought possible to escape into Virginia.

Lord Cornwallis had been told that it would be impossible to get enough boats at the ferries on the Dan to transport the American troops before he could catch up with them. And, since the river couldn't be crossed at any point downstream, he confidently planned to succeed in his goal by staying ahead of Greene and preventing him from reaching the shallow crossings that were thought to be the only way to escape into Virginia.

Dix's ferry is about fifty miles from Guilford court house, and was almost equidistant from the two armies. Considerably below, and more than seventy miles from Guilford court house, were two other ferries, Boyd's and Irwin's, which were only four miles apart. By directing their march towards the lower and more remote ferries, the distance from Lord Cornwallis was so much ground gained; and by despatching an officer with a few men to Dix's, the boats at that, and at an intermediate ferry, might be brought down the river in time to meet the army at the intended crossing place. These facts being suggested by Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, quartermaster general for the southern department, the proposition was instantly adopted, and an officer despatched to bring the boats from above down to Boyd's ferry.[60]

Dix's ferry is about fifty miles from Guilford courthouse and is almost the same distance from both armies. Further down, more than seventy miles from Guilford courthouse, are two other ferries, Boyd's and Irwin's, which are only four miles apart. By moving toward the lower and more distant ferries, they gained ground from Lord Cornwallis; and by sending an officer with a few men to Dix's, the boats there and at an intermediate ferry could be brought down the river in time to meet the army at the planned crossing point. These suggestions were made by Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, the quartermaster general for the southern department, and the proposal was quickly accepted, resulting in an officer being sent to bring the boats from upstream down to Boyd's ferry.[60]

The next day both armies resumed their line of march. While General Greene pressed forward to Boyd's, Williams gained an intermediate road leading to Dix's ferry, and thus placed himself between the two armies, a small distance in front of the one, and considerably in rear of the other. Such was the boldness and activity of this corps that Lord Cornwallis found it necessary to temper the eagerness of his pursuit with caution. Yet he moved with great rapidity;—marching nearly thirty miles each day. On the morning of the third day, he attempted to surprise the Americans by marching from the rear of his column into the road which had been taken by them, while his van proceeded slowly on its original route. Information of this movement was received, and Lieutenant Colonel Lee charged his advanced cavalry with such impetuosity, as to cut a company nearly to pieces. A captain and several privates were made prisoners. The whole British army turned into this road and followed in the rear of Williams, who used every effort to delay their march.

The next day, both armies continued their march. While General Greene moved forward to Boyd's, Williams took a side road that led to Dix's ferry, positioning himself between the two armies, slightly ahead of one and well behind the other. The boldness and quickness of this unit forced Lord Cornwallis to balance his eagerness to chase with some caution. Still, he moved quickly, covering nearly thirty miles each day. On the morning of the third day, he tried to catch the Americans off guard by moving from the back of his column onto the road they had taken, while his front troops continued slowly on their original path. News of this maneuver got out, and Lieutenant Colonel Lee ordered his advanced cavalry to charge with such force that they nearly destroyed one of the companies. A captain and several privates were captured. The entire British army shifted onto this road and followed behind Williams, who did everything he could to slow their advance.

February 14.

The measures adopted by Greene for collecting the boats were successful; and, on the fourteenth, he effected the passage of his troops and stores.

The measures taken by Greene to gather the boats worked well; and, on the fourteenth, he successfully moved his troops and supplies across.

When Williams supposed that the American army had reached the Dan, he left the road leading to Dix's ferry, and entering that which Greene had taken, urged his march to the lower[Pg 315] ferries with the utmost celerity. Lord Cornwallis, being at length informed that Greene had taken the lower road, turned into it about the same time by a nearer way, and his front was in sight of the rear of Williams. So rapid were the movements of both armies that, in the last twenty-four hours, the Americans marched forty miles; and the rear had scarcely touched the northern bank, when the van of the enemy appeared on the opposite shore.

When Williams thought the American army had reached the Dan, he left the road to Dix's ferry and took the one that Greene had chosen, pushing his march to the lower[Pg 315] ferries as quickly as possible. Lord Cornwallis was eventually informed that Greene had taken the lower road, so he switched to it as well, using a shorter path, and his front lines came into view of Williams' rear. Both armies moved so quickly that in just the last twenty-four hours, the Americans covered forty miles; just as the rear touched the northern bank, the enemy's front appeared on the opposite shore.

That General Greene was able to effect this retreat without loss, evidences the judgment with which he improved every favourable circumstance.

That General Greene managed to carry out this retreat without any losses shows the good judgment he used to take advantage of every favorable situation.

The exertions, the fatigues, the sufferings, and the patience of both armies, during this long, toilsome, and rapid pursuit, were extreme. Without tents, without spirits, often without provisions, and always scantily supplied with them; through deep and frozen roads, high waters, and frequent rains; each performed, without a murmur, the severe duties assigned to it. The difference between them consists only in this,—the British troops were well clothed; the Americans were almost naked, and many of them barefooted.

The efforts, exhaustion, struggles, and patience of both armies during this long, grueling, and swift pursuit were intense. Without tents, low morale, often lacking food, and always minimally supplied; through deep frozen roads, high waters, and frequent rain; each carried out the tough tasks assigned to them without complaint. The only difference between them was this: the British troops were well-dressed; the Americans were nearly naked, and many of them were barefoot.

Great praise was bestowed by the general on his whole army; but the exertions of Colonel Williams, and of Lieutenant Colonel Carrington were particularly noticed.[Pg 316]

The general praised his entire army, but he specifically acknowledged the efforts of Colonel Williams and Lieutenant Colonel Carrington.[Pg 316]

Although that part of North Carolina through which the armies had passed, was well affected to the American cause, such was the rapidity with which they moved, and such the terror inspired by the presence of the enemy, that no aid was drawn from the militia. Indeed, those who had joined the army from the more remote parts of the country could not be retained; and, when it reached the Dan, the militia attached to it did not exceed eighty men.

Although that part of North Carolina that the armies had gone through was supportive of the American cause, the speed at which they moved and the fear caused by the enemy's presence meant that no help came from the militia. In fact, those who had joined the army from farther away couldn't be kept, and by the time they reached the Dan, the militia with them was down to less than eighty men.

Having driven Greene out of North Carolina, Lord Cornwallis turned his attention to the re-establishment of regal authority in that state. Lord Cornwallis retires to Hillsborough.For this purpose, he proceeded by easy marches to Hillsborough, at that time its capital, where he erected the royal standard, and issued a proclamation inviting the inhabitants to repair to it, and to assist him in restoring the ancient government.

Having driven Greene out of North Carolina, Lord Cornwallis focused on re-establishing royal authority in the state. Lord Cornwallis retreats to Hillsborough. To achieve this, he made his way to Hillsborough, which was the capital at the time, where he raised the royal standard and issued a proclamation inviting the locals to come join him in restoring the old government.

As soon as it was known that General Greene had entered Virginia, he was reinforced by six hundred militia drawn from the neighbouring counties, the command of which was given to General Stevens.

As soon as it became known that General Greene had entered Virginia, he was supported by six hundred militia from the nearby counties, which were led by General Stevens.

Apprehension that Lord Cornwallis, if left in the undisturbed possession of North Carolina, would succeed, to the extent of his hopes, in recruiting his army and procuring the submission of the people, General Greene determined, on receiving this small reinforcement, to re-enter that state; and, avoiding a general engagement,[Pg 317] to keep the field against a superior enemy, who had demonstrated his capacity for rapid movement and hardy enterprise.

Apprehension that Lord Cornwallis, if allowed to maintain control of North Carolina, would manage to recruit his army and gain the people's compliance led General Greene to decide, upon receiving this small reinforcement, to re-enter that state; and, instead of engaging in a full battle,[Pg 317] he aimed to stay active against a stronger enemy, who had shown his ability for quick movements and bold actions.

February.
Greene recrosses the Dan.

On the 18th, while Lord Cornwallis remained on the opposite shore, the legion of Lee had passed the Dan. On the 21st, the light infantry also recrossed it; and, on the 23d, they were followed by the main body of the army.

On the 18th, while Lord Cornwallis stayed on the opposite shore, Lee's legion had crossed the Dan. On the 21st, the light infantry crossed it again; and on the 23rd, they were followed by the main force of the army.

The light infantry hung round the quarters of the enemy, while the main body advanced slowly, keeping in view the roads to the western parts of the country, from which a considerable reinforcement of militia was expected.[61]

The light infantry lingered near the enemy's quarters while the main force moved forward slowly, staying aware of the roads leading to the western regions, where a significant reinforcement of militia was anticipated.[61]

General Greene was not mistaken in the consequences of leaving Lord Cornwallis in the peaceable possession of North Carolina. He was informed that seven independent companies were raised in one day. A large body of royalists had begun to embody themselves on the branches of the Haw River; and Colonel Tarlton, with the cavalry of his legion and some infantry, was detached from Hillsborough to favour their rising, and to conduct them to the British army.

General Greene was right about the risks of allowing Lord Cornwallis to maintain control over North Carolina. He learned that seven independent companies were formed in a single day. A significant number of loyalists had started to gather along the branches of the Haw River, and Colonel Tarlton, along with the cavalry from his legion and some infantry, was sent from Hillsborough to support their uprising and bring them to the British army.

Intelligence of the movements of the loyalists and of Tarlton being received, Greene ordered[Pg 318] Lieutenant Colonel Lee with the cavalry of his legion, and General Pickens with between three and four hundred militia, who had just formed a junction near Hillsborough, to move against both parties.

Intelligence about the movements of the loyalists and Tarlton was received, so Greene ordered[Pg 318] Lieutenant Colonel Lee with his cavalry and General Pickens with about three to four hundred militia, who had just joined forces near Hillsborough, to take action against both groups.

In a long lane, Lee, whose cavalry was in front of the whole detachment, came up with the royalists. He was mistaken by them for Tarlton, whom they had not yet seen, to whose encampment they were proceeding, and whose corps was then taking refreshment, not much more than a mile distant from them. Perceiving their mistake, Lee received their expressions of joy and attachment, and had just reached their colonel, to whom he was about to make communications which might have enabled him to proceed on his design of surprising Tarlton, when the infantry who followed close in his rear, were recognized by the insurgents; and a firing took place between them. Party of loyalists commanded by Colonel Pyle, cut to pieces.It being apparent that this circumstance must give the alarm to the British, Lee changed his plan, and turning on the royalists, who still supposed him to be a British officer, cut them to pieces while they were making protestations of loyalty, and asserting that they were "the very best friends of the king." More than one hundred, among whom was Colonel Pyle, their leader, fell under the swords of his cavalry. This terrible but unavoidable carnage broke, in a great measure, the spirits of the tories in that part of the country. Some[Pg 319] who were on their march to join the British standard, returned, determined to await the issue of events before they went too far to recede.

In a long lane, Lee, whose cavalry was leading the entire group, encountered the royalists. They mistakenly thought he was Tarlton, whom they hadn't seen yet, and were heading to his camp, where his troops were resting just over a mile away. Realizing their error, Lee accepted their cheers and loyalty, and had just reached their colonel to share information that could help surprise Tarlton when the infantry closely following him was spotted by the insurgents, leading to a gunfight between them. A group of loyalists led by Colonel Pyle was completely destroyed. Knowing this would alert the British, Lee changed his approach and, facing the royalists who still believed he was a British officer, attacked them while they were declaring their loyalty and claiming to be "the very best friends of the king." Over a hundred, including their leader Colonel Pyle, were slain by his cavalry. This horrific but unavoidable slaughter significantly dampened the spirits of the tories in that area. Some[Pg 319] who were on their way to join the British decided to turn back, choosing to wait and see how things played out before committing too deeply.

The hope of surprising Tarlton being thus disappointed, Pickens and Lee determined to postpone the attack till the morning; and took a position for the night between him and a corps of militia which was advancing from the western counties of Virginia under Colonel Preston. Tarlton had meditated an attempt on this corps; but at midnight, when his troops were paraded to march on this design, he received an express from Lord Cornwallis, directing his immediate return to the army. In obedience to this order, he began his retreat long before day, and crossed the Haw, just as the Americans, who followed him, appeared on the opposite bank. Two pieces of artillery commanded the ford and stopped the pursuit.

The hope of surprising Tarlton was dashed, so Pickens and Lee decided to delay the attack until morning. They set up for the night between him and a group of militia advancing from the western counties of Virginia under Colonel Preston. Tarlton had been planning to launch an attack on this group, but at midnight, when his troops were ready to march, he received a message from Lord Cornwallis ordering him to return to the army immediately. Following this order, he began his retreat long before daybreak and crossed the Haw River just as the Americans chasing him appeared on the opposite bank. Two pieces of artillery were positioned at the crossing and halted the pursuit.

To approach more nearly the great body of the loyalists, who were settled between Haw and Deep Rivers, and to take a position in a country less exhausted than that around Hillsborough, Lord Cornwallis crossed the Haw, and encamped on Allimance creek.

To get closer to the large group of loyalists living between Haw and Deep Rivers and to establish a position in an area less depleted than the one around Hillsborough, Lord Cornwallis crossed the Haw and set up camp on Allimance Creek.

As the British army retired, General Greene advanced. Not being yet in a condition to hazard an engagement, he changed his ground every night. In the course of the critical movements, which were made in order to avoid an action, and at the same time to overawe the loy[Pg 320]alists, and maintain a position favourable to a junction with the several detachments who were marching from different quarters to his assistance, he derived immense service from a bold and active light infantry, and from a cavalry which, though inferior in numbers, was rendered superior in effect to that of his enemy, by being much better mounted. They often attacked boldly and successfully, and made sudden incursions into the country, which so intimidated the royalists, that Lord Cornwallis found it difficult to obtain intelligence. By these means, all his attempts to bring the American general to action were frustrated; and his lordship was under the necessity of keeping his men close in their quarters.

As the British army pulled back, General Greene moved forward. Not feeling ready to engage in battle, he changed locations every night. During these crucial movements, aimed at avoiding conflict while also instilling fear in the loyalists and keeping a position favorable for joining forces with various detachments coming to his aid, he received great support from a daring and active light infantry, as well as from cavalry that, though outnumbered, was more effective than that of his enemy due to being much better mounted. They often launched bold and successful attacks, making sudden strikes into the countryside that intimidated the loyalists so much that Lord Cornwallis struggled to gather information. Because of this, all his efforts to draw the American general into a fight were thwarted, forcing his lordship to keep his troops confined to their quarters.

During this hazardous trial of skill, Lord Cornwallis moved out in full force towards Rudy fork, where the light infantry lay, in the hope of surprising that corps under cover of a thick fog; and probably with ulterior views against General Greene. His approach was perceived, and a sharp skirmish ensued between a part of the light infantry, and a much superior body of British troops commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Webster, in which the loss was supposed to be nearly equal. The advance of the British army obliged Williams to retire; and General Greene, by recrossing the Haw and uniting with the light infantry on its north-eastern bank at the Rocky ford, disappointed any far[Pg 321]ther designs which might have been formed against the army then under his command, or against the reinforcements which were approaching. Being thus foiled, Lord Cornwallis withdrew to Deep River, and General Greene fell back to the iron works on Troublesome creek.

During this risky test of skill, Lord Cornwallis moved out in full force toward Rudy Fork, where the light infantry was positioned, hoping to catch them off guard in the thick fog; he likely had further plans against General Greene. His approach was noticed, and a fierce skirmish broke out between part of the light infantry and a much larger force of British troops led by Lieutenant Colonel Webster, with losses believed to be nearly equal on both sides. The advance of the British army forced Williams to retreat; General Greene, by crossing back over the Haw and joining the light infantry on its northeastern bank at Rocky Ford, thwarted any further plans that might have been made against his army or the reinforcements that were on their way. Being thus outmaneuvered, Lord Cornwallis withdrew to Deep River, while General Greene fell back to the ironworks on Troublesome Creek.

At length his reinforcements, though much inferior to the number he had been taught to expect, were received, and Greene, in his turn, sought a battle. With this view, he dissolved the corps of light infantry, advanced towards his enemy, and encamped within eight miles of him, at Guilford court house.

At last, his reinforcements arrived, although they were far fewer than he had been led to believe. Greene, eager for a fight, disbanded the light infantry corps, moved closer to his enemy, and set up camp just eight miles away, at Guilford Courthouse.

His army, including officers, amounted to about four thousand five hundred men, of whom not quite two thousand were continental troops and the residue consisted of Virginia and North Carolina militia. Those of Virginia were commanded by Generals Stevens and Lawson, and by Colonels Preston, Campbell, and Lynch; and those of North Carolina, by Generals Butler and Eaton.

His army, along with officers, totaled around four thousand five hundred men, with just under two thousand being Continental troops, and the rest made up of Virginia and North Carolina militia. The Virginia militia was led by Generals Stevens and Lawson, as well as Colonels Preston, Campbell, and Lynch; the North Carolina troops were commanded by Generals Butler and Eaton.

Of the four regiments which composed the continental infantry, only one, the first of Maryland, was veteran. The other three consisted of new levies, with a few old continental soldiers interspersed among them. The legion of Lee, and the cavalry of Washington, like the first regiment of Maryland, added every advantage of experience to approved courage; and nearly[Pg 322] all the officers commanding the new levies were veteran.

Of the four regiments that made up the Continental infantry, only one, the First of Maryland, was made up of veterans. The other three were made up of new recruits, with a few seasoned Continental soldiers mixed in. Lee's Legion and Washington's cavalry, like the First Maryland regiment, combined experience with proven bravery; and almost[Pg 322] all the officers leading the new recruits were veterans.

March 15.

Having determined to risk an action, Greene chose his ground with judgment. Early in the morning of the 15th, the fire of his reconnoitring parties announced the approach of the enemy on the great Salisbury road, and his army was immediately arranged in order of battle. Battle of Guilford.It was drawn up in three lines, on a large hill, surrounded by other hills, chiefly covered with trees and underwood.

Having decided to take a risk, Greene carefully selected his position. Early in the morning on the 15th, the shots from his scouting teams signaled the enemy's approach on the main Salisbury road, and his army quickly lined up for battle. Battle of Guilford. It was arranged in three lines on a large hill, surrounded by other hills mostly covered with trees and bushes.

The front line was composed of the two brigades of North Carolina militia, who were posted to great advantage on the edge of the wood, behind a strong rail fence, with an extensive open field in front.

The front line consisted of two brigades of North Carolina militia, positioned advantageously at the edge of the woods, behind a sturdy rail fence, with a wide open field in front of them.

The two brigades of Virginia militia formed the second line. They were drawn up entirely in the wood, about three hundred yards in rear of the first, and on either side of the great Salisbury road.

The two brigades of Virginia militia formed the second line. They were positioned entirely in the woods, about three hundred yards behind the first line and on either side of the main Salisbury road.

The third line was placed about three hundred yards in rear of the second, and was composed of continental troops. The Virginia brigade, commanded by General Huger, was on the right; that of Maryland, commanded by Colonel Williams, was on the left. They were drawn up obliquely, with their left diverging from the second line, and partly in open ground.

The third line was positioned about three hundred yards behind the second and consisted of Continental troops. The Virginia brigade, led by General Huger, was on the right, while the Maryland brigade, commanded by Colonel Williams, was on the left. They were arranged diagonally, with their left side extending away from the second line and partly in open ground.

The first and third regiments of dragoons, amounting to one hundred and two troopers,[Pg 323] Kirkwood's company of light infantry, and a regiment of militia riflemen under Colonel Lynch, formed a corps of observation for the security of the right flank, which was commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Washington. The legion, consisting of one hundred and sixty-eight horse and foot, and a body of riflemen commanded by Colonels Campbell and Preston, formed a corps of observation for the security of the left flank, which was placed under Lieutenant Colonel Lee. The artillery was in the front line, in the great road leading through the centre, with directions to fall back as the occasion should require.

The first and third dragoon regiments, totaling one hundred and two troopers,[Pg 323] Kirkwood's light infantry company, and a regiment of militia riflemen led by Colonel Lynch, made up a surveillance unit for the security of the right flank, which was under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Washington. The legion, made up of one hundred and sixty-eight cavalry and infantry, along with a group of riflemen led by Colonels Campbell and Preston, formed a surveillance unit for the left flank, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Lee. The artillery positioned itself in the front line along the main road that ran through the center, prepared to withdraw as needed.

Though Lord Cornwallis was sensible that the numbers of the American army were greatly augmented by troops whose continuance in service would be of short duration, he deemed it so important to the interests of his sovereign to maintain the appearance of superiority in the field, that he was unwilling to decline the engagement now offered him.

Though Lord Cornwallis realized that the American army's numbers were significantly boosted by troops whose time in service would be brief, he considered it so crucial to his sovereign's interests to uphold the appearance of strength in the field that he was reluctant to refuse the engagement now presented to him.

March 14.
Fifteenth.

On the advance of Greene, therefore, he prepared for action; and early in the morning moved from his ground, determined to attack the adverse army wherever it should be found. About four miles from Guilford court house, the advance, led by Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton, fell in with Lee, and a sharp skirmish ensued, which was terminated by the appearance of such large bodies of British troops, as rendered it prudent[Pg 324] for Lee to retire. His lordship continued to advance until he came within view of the American army. His disposition for the attack was then made in the following order.

On Greene's advance, he got ready for action; and early in the morning, he moved from his position, determined to attack the opposing army wherever he could find it. About four miles from Guilford courthouse, the lead unit, led by Lieutenant Colonel Tarleton, encountered Lee, and a fierce skirmish broke out, which ended when large numbers of British troops appeared, making it wise[Pg 324] for Lee to fall back. His lordship kept advancing until he could see the American army. He then organized his attack in the following order.

The seventy-first British regiment, with the German regiment of Bose, led by General Leslie, and supported by the first battalion of the guards under Colonel Norton, formed the right, and the twenty-third and thirty-third regiments, led by Lieutenant Colonel Webster, and supported by Brigadier General O'Hara with the grenadiers and second battalion of the guards, formed the left. The light infantry of the guards and the Yagers, posted in the wood on the left of the artillery, and the cavalry in column behind it in the road, formed a corps of observation.[62]

The 71st British regiment, along with the German Bose regiment, led by General Leslie, and backed by the first battalion of the guards under Colonel Norton, made up the right flank. The 23rd and 33rd regiments, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Webster and supported by Brigadier General O'Hara with the grenadiers and the second battalion of the guards, formed the left. The light infantry of the guards and the Yagers were positioned in the woods to the left of the artillery, with the cavalry lined up in column behind it on the road, creating a reconnaissance unit.[62]

This disposition being made, the British troops advanced to the charge, with the cool intrepidity which discipline inspires.

This arrangement completed, the British troops charged forward with the calm bravery that comes from training.

The North Carolina militia were not encouraged by the great advantages of their position to await the shock. They broke instantly; and, throwing away their arms and flying through the woods, sought their respective homes.

The North Carolina militia, despite having a strong position, didn’t stick around to face the confrontation. They panicked and immediately abandoned their weapons, fleeing through the woods to get back to their homes.

The British then advanced on the second line, which received them with more firmness; and maintained their ground for some time with great resolution. Lord Cornwallis perceiving the corps on his flanks, brought the whole of his[Pg 325] reserved infantry into the line. On the right, General Leslie brought up the guards to oppose Lee; and, on the left, Webster changed his front to the left, and attacked Washington, while the grenadiers and second battalion of guards moved forward to occupy the place which he had just quitted.[63]

The British then moved forward to the second line, which held their ground more firmly, standing strong for a while. Lord Cornwallis, noticing the units on his sides, brought all his[Pg 325] reserve infantry into position. On the right, General Leslie brought in the guards to counter Lee, while on the left, Webster shifted his formation to the left and attacked Washington, as the grenadiers and the second battalion of guards advanced to take the spot he had just left.[63]

The ground being unfavourable to the action of horse, Washington had posted Lynch's riflemen, with whom he remained in person, on a height covered with thick woods; and had drawn up his cavalry and continental infantry about one hundred yards in their rear. On being attacked by Webster, the riflemen broke; and Washington, finding it impossible to rally them, rejoined his cavalry.

The ground was not suitable for horses, so Washington placed Lynch's riflemen, whom he stayed with, on a hill surrounded by dense woods and positioned his cavalry and Continental infantry about a hundred yards behind them. When Webster attacked, the riflemen scattered, and Washington, realizing he couldn't regroup them, went back to his cavalry.

The British continuing to advance, and it being well understood that the militia could not stand the bayonet, General Stevens, who had received a ball in his right thigh, ordered his brigade to retreat. Lawson's brigade having given way a short time before, the second line was entirely routed; and the enemy advanced boldly on the third.

The British kept advancing, and it was clear that the militia couldn't withstand the bayonet. General Stevens, who had been shot in his right thigh, ordered his brigade to fall back. Lawson's brigade had already retreated a little while earlier, so the second line was completely defeated, and the enemy moved forward confidently against the third line.

The several divisions of the British army had been separated from each other by extending themselves to the right and left in order to encounter the distinct corps which threatened their flanks; and by advancing in regiments at different times, as the different parts of the second[Pg 326] line had given way. The thickness of the wood increased the difficulty of restoring order. They pressed forward with great eagerness, but with a considerable degree of irregularity.

The different divisions of the British army had spread out to the right and left to face the separate groups that were threatening their sides. They moved forward in regiments at different times, as various sections of the second[Pg 326] line had fallen apart. The density of the forest made it harder to get organized again. They pushed ahead with a lot of enthusiasm, but also with a significant lack of order.

Greene, in this state of the action, entertained the most sanguine hopes of a complete victory. His continental troops were fresh, in perfect order, and upon the point of engaging an enemy, broken into distinct parts, and probably supposing the severity of the action to be over. This fair prospect was blasted by the misconduct of a single corps. The second regiment of Maryland was posted at some distance from the first, in open ground; its left forming almost a right angle with the line, so as to present a front to any corps which might attack on that flank. The British in advancing, inclined to the right; and the second battalion of guards entered the open ground immediately after the retreat of Stevens, and rushed on the second regiment of Maryland while the first was engaged with Webster. Without waiting to receive the charge, that regiment broke in confusion. By pursuing them, the guards were thrown into the rear of the first regiment, from which they were concealed by the unevenness of the ground, and by a skirt of wood.

Greene, at this point in the action, had high hopes for a complete victory. His continental troops were fresh, well-organized, and about to engage an enemy that was scattered and likely thinking the worst of the battle was over. This promising situation was shattered by the failure of a single unit. The second Maryland regiment was stationed some distance from the first, in open ground, with its left forming almost a right angle with the line, ready to face any attack from that side. As the British advanced, they veered to the right, and the second battalion of guards entered the open ground right after Stevens retreated and charged towards the second Maryland regiment while the first was occupied with Webster. Instead of bracing for the charge, that regiment panicked and broke in confusion. In chasing them down, the guards ended up behind the first regiment, hidden by the uneven terrain and a stretch of woods.

Greene was himself on the left, and witnessed the misfortune without being able to remedy it. His militia being entirely routed, the flight of one-fourth of his continental troops would most[Pg 327] probably decide the fate of the day. Unwilling to risk his remaining three regiments, only one of which could be safely relied on, without a man to cover their retreat should the event prove unfortunate, he ordered Colonel Greene of Virginia to withdraw his regiment from the line, and to take a position in the rear, for the purpose of affording a rallying point, and of covering the retreat of the two regiments which still continued in the field.

Greene was on the left side and saw the disaster unfold without being able to do anything about it. His militia was completely defeated, and the retreat of one-fourth of his continental troops would most[Pg 327] likely decide the outcome of the battle. Not wanting to risk his remaining three regiments—only one of which he could truly depend on—without anyone to support their retreat in case things went south, he ordered Colonel Greene of Virginia to pull his regiment from the front lines and take a position in the rear to provide a rallying point and cover the retreat of the two regiments still fighting.

The guards were soon called from the pursuit of the second Maryland regiment, and led by Lieutenant Colonel Stuart against the first. About this time Webster, finding himself overpowered by the first Maryland regiment, then commanded by Colonel Gunby, and by Kirkwood's company and the remaining regiment of Virginia, with whom he was engaged at the same time, had in a great measure withdrawn from the action, and retired across a ravine into an adjoining wood. This critical respite enabled Gunby to provide for the danger in his rear. Facing about, he met the guards, and a very animated fire took place on both sides, during which the Americans continued to advance.

The guards were soon called off from chasing the second Maryland regiment and led by Lieutenant Colonel Stuart to face the first. Around this time, Webster, feeling overwhelmed by the first Maryland regiment, which was then led by Colonel Gunby, as well as Kirkwood's company and the other Virginia regiment he was simultaneously engaged with, had largely pulled back from the fight and retreated across a ravine into a nearby woods. This crucial break allowed Gunby to address the threat behind him. Turning to face the guards, an intense exchange of fire erupted on both sides, while the Americans kept pushing forward.

In this critical moment, Lieutenant Colonel Washington, who was drawn to this part of the field by the vivacity of the fire, made a furious charge upon the guards and broke their ranks. At this juncture, Gunby's horse was killed under him, and the command devolved on Lieutenant[Pg 328] Colonel Howard. The regiment advanced with such rapidity that Gunby could not overtake it, and was within thirty yards of the guards when they were charged by the cavalry. Almost at the same instant the Maryland infantry rushed upon them with the bayonet, and following the horse through them, were masters of the whole battalion. In passing through it, Captain Smith of the infantry killed its commanding officer.

In this crucial moment, Lieutenant Colonel Washington, attracted to this part of the battlefield by the intensity of the fire, launched a fierce attack on the guards and broke their formation. At this point, Gunby's horse was shot out from under him, and command shifted to Lieutenant[Pg 328] Colonel Howard. The regiment advanced so quickly that Gunby couldn’t catch up and was just thirty yards away from the guards when the cavalry charged. Almost simultaneously, the Maryland infantry attacked them with bayonets, and following the cavalry through, took control of the entire battalion. As they moved through, Captain Smith of the infantry killed the commanding officer.

After passing through the guards into the open ground where the second regiment had been originally posted, Howard perceived several British columns, with some pieces of artillery. Believing his regiment to be the sole infantry remaining in the field, he retreated in good order, and brought off some prisoners. The cavalry also retreated.[64]

After going through the guards onto the open ground where the second regiment had first been stationed, Howard noticed several British columns along with some artillery. Thinking his regiment was the only infantry left on the field, he fell back in an organized manner and took some prisoners with him. The cavalry also retreated.[64]

About the same time the remaining Virginia regiment commanded by Colonel Hawes, and Kirkwood's infantry, who were still engaged with Webster, were directed by General Greene to retreat. The artillery was unavoidably abandoned; the horses which drew the pieces being killed, and the woods too thick to admit of their[Pg 329] being dragged elsewhere than along the great road. The retreat was made in good order, and Greene, in person, brought up the rear.

About the same time, the remaining Virginia regiment led by Colonel Hawes and Kirkwood's infantry, who were still in a fight with Webster, were ordered by General Greene to pull back. They had to leave the artillery behind because the horses that were pulling the cannons were killed, and the woods were too dense to drag them anywhere other than along the main road. The retreat was carried out smoothly, and Greene personally brought up the rear.

Though the action was over on the right and centre, Campbell's riflemen still maintained their ground on the extreme of the American left, against General Leslie with the regiment of Bose and the first battalion of guards.

Though the fighting was done on the right and center, Campbell's riflemen still held their position on the far left of the American line, facing off against General Leslie with the Bose regiment and the first battalion of guards.

After the guards had routed the brigade commanded by Lawson, they were attacked on their right flank by the infantry of Lee's legion and by Campbell's riflemen, and were driven behind the regiment of Bose, which having moved with less impetuosity, was advancing in compact order.

After the guards had defeated the brigade led by Lawson, they were hit on their right side by the infantry of Lee's legion and by Campbell's riflemen, forcing them to retreat behind Bose's regiment, which, having moved more steadily, was advancing in an organized manner.

This regiment sustained the American fire until Lieutenant Colonel Norton was able to rally the guards and to bring them back to the charge; after which the action was maintained with great obstinacy on both sides until the battle was decided on the right. Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton was then ordered to the support of Leslie. The legion infantry had retreated, and only a few resolute marksmen remained in the rear of Campbell who continued firing from tree to tree. Being unable to resist a charge of cavalry, they were quickly driven from the field.

This regiment held its ground against the American fire until Lieutenant Colonel Norton could regroup the guards and lead them back into the fight. The battle then continued fiercely on both sides until the outcome was determined on the right. Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton was then sent to support Leslie. The legion infantry had fallen back, leaving only a handful of determined sharpshooters in the rear of Campbell, who kept firing from tree to tree. Unable to withstand a cavalry charge, they were soon forced off the field.

Two regiments of infantry and a detachment of cavalry pursued the right wing and centre of the Americans for a short distance, but were soon ordered to return. On examining his situation,[Pg 330] Lord Cornwallis found himself too much weakened, and his troops too much fatigued by the action, to hazard its renewal, or to continue the pursuit. General Greene halted about three miles from the field of battle, behind Rudy fork creek, for the purpose of collecting his stragglers; after which he retired about twelve miles, to the iron works on Troublesome creek, the place appointed for the rendezvous of his army in the event of its being defeated.

Two regiments of infantry and a detachment of cavalry chased the right wing and center of the Americans for a short distance but were soon ordered to turn back. After assessing his situation,[Pg 330] Lord Cornwallis realized he was too weakened and his troops too tired from the fighting to risk renewing the battle or continuing the chase. General Greene stopped about three miles from the battlefield, behind Rudy Fork Creek, to gather his stragglers. After that, he retreated about twelve miles to the ironworks on Troublesome Creek, the designated meeting point for his army in case of defeat.

The returns made immediately after the action, exhibited a loss in killed, wounded and missing in the continental troops, of fourteen commissioned officers, and three hundred and twelve non-commissioned officers and privates. Major Anderson, a valuable officer of Maryland, was killed; and General Huger, who commanded the continental troops of Virginia, was wounded.

The reports right after the battle showed that the continental troops suffered a loss of fourteen commissioned officers and three hundred twelve non-commissioned officers and soldiers who were killed, wounded, or missing. Major Anderson, an important officer from Maryland, was killed, and General Huger, who led the continental troops from Virginia, was injured.

The same return states the loss of the militia at four captains and seventeen privates killed; and, in addition to General Stevens, one major, three captains, eight subalterns, and sixty privates, were wounded. A great proportion of this part of the army was missing; but it seems to have been expected that they would either rejoin their corps, or be found at their homes.

The same report indicates that four captains and seventeen privates were killed in the militia; additionally, besides General Stevens, one major, three captains, eight junior officers, and sixty privates were injured. A significant portion of this part of the army was unaccounted for, but it was expected that they would either return to their unit or be found at home.

The victory at Guilford was dearly purchased. Official accounts state the loss of the British army at five hundred and thirty-two men, among whom were several officers of high rank and dis[Pg 331]tinguished merit. Lieutenant Colonel Stuart of the guards was killed, and Lieutenant Colonel Webster, who was ranked by his enemies among the best officers in the British service, was mortally wounded. This loss, when compared with the numbers brought by Lord Cornwallis into the field, was very considerable. The Americans did not compute his troops at more than two thousand rank and file, but his own accounts state them at only fourteen hundred and forty-five.

The victory at Guilford came at a high cost. Official reports indicate that the British army lost five hundred and thirty-two men, including several high-ranking officers with notable skill. Lieutenant Colonel Stuart of the guards was killed, and Lieutenant Colonel Webster, who was considered one of the best officers in the British army by his opponents, suffered fatal injuries. This loss was significant compared to the number of troops Lord Cornwallis had in the field. The Americans estimated his forces at no more than two thousand soldiers, while his own records stated they were only fourteen hundred and forty-five.

No battle in the course of the war reflects more honour on the courage of the British troops, than that of Guilford. On no other occasion have they fought with such inferiority of numbers, or disadvantage of ground. Estimating his first line at nothing, General Greene's army consisted of three thousand two hundred men, posted on ground chosen by himself; and his disposition was skilfully made.

No battle during the war shows the bravery of the British troops more than the Battle of Guilford. They had never fought under such a disadvantage of numbers or terrain. Considering his first line as negligible, General Greene's army had three thousand two hundred soldiers positioned on ground he selected himself, and his deployment was expertly organized.

The American general, expecting to be again attacked, prepared for another engagement. But the situation of Lord Cornwallis had become too desperate to hazard a second battle, or to maintain his position. He found himself under the necessity of retreating to a place of greater security, where provisions might be obtained.

The American general, anticipating another attack, got ready for another fight. However, Lord Cornwallis's situation had become too dire to risk a second battle or to hold his ground. He realized he needed to retreat to a safer location where he could secure provisions.

When the expedition into North Carolina was originally meditated, Major Craig, at the head of a small military and naval force, took possession of Wilmington, a town near the mouth[Pg 332] of Cape Fear, and extended his authority several miles up the river. Lord Cornwallis now looked to a communication with this post for aids which had become indispensable to the farther operations of the campaign.

When the expedition into North Carolina was first planned, Major Craig, leading a small military and naval force, took control of Wilmington, a town near the mouth[Pg 332] of Cape Fear, and expanded his authority several miles up the river. Lord Cornwallis was now seeking a way to communicate with this post for support that had become essential for the ongoing campaign.

On the third day after the battle, he broke up his encampment, and proceeded by slow and easy marches towards Cross creek.

On the third day after the battle, he packed up his camp and moved at a slow and steady pace toward Cross Creek.

Greene advances to Ramsay's mills with a determination to enter South Carolina.

General Greene, on hearing that the British army was retreating, resolved to follow it. The difficulty of subsisting the troops in an exhausted and hostile country; and the necessity of waiting for a supply of ammunition, impeded the march of his army so much that he did not reach Ramsay's mills until the 28th of March.

General Greene, upon learning that the British army was retreating, decided to pursue them. The challenge of feeding the troops in a depleted and unfriendly territory, along with the need to wait for a supply of ammunition, greatly slowed down his army's progress, causing them to arrive at Ramsay's mills only on March 28th.

At this place Lord Cornwallis had halted, and here General Greene expected to overtake and attack him. But, on the approach of the American army, his lordship resumed his march to Cross creek, and afterwards to Wilmington, where he arrived on the 7th of April.April 7.

At this spot, Lord Cornwallis stopped, and General Greene planned to catch up to him and launch an attack. However, when the American army got close, his lordship continued his march to Cross Creek, and then to Wilmington, where he arrived on April 7.April 7th.

General Greene gave over the pursuit at Ramsay's mills. So excessive had been the sufferings of his army from the want of provisions, that many of the men fainted on the march, and it had become absolutely necessary to allow them some repose and refreshment. The expiration of the time for which the Virginia militia had been called into service, furnished an additional motive for suspending the pursuit.[Pg 333]

General Greene stopped the chase at Ramsay's mills. The hardships his army faced due to a lack of food were so severe that many soldiers fainted during the march, making it essential to let them rest and eat. The end of the period for which the Virginia militia had been called up also provided a strong reason to halt the pursuit.[Pg 333]

At this place, the bold and happy resolution was taken to carry the war into South Carolina.

At this point, the brave and optimistic decision was made to launch the war in South Carolina.

The motives which induced the adoption of this measure were stated by himself in a letter communicating his determination to the Commander-in-chief. It would compel Lord Cornwallis to follow him, and thus liberate North Carolina, or to sacrifice all his posts in the upper parts of South Carolina and Georgia.

The reasons that led to this decision were explained by him in a letter informing the Commander-in-chief of his intentions. It would force Lord Cornwallis to pursue him, thereby freeing North Carolina, or to give up all his positions in the northern regions of South Carolina and Georgia.

The Southern army amounted to about seventeen hundred effectives. That of Lord Cornwallis is understood to have been still less numerous. So impotent were the means employed for the conquest and defence of states which were of immense extent and value.

The Southern army had around seventeen hundred active soldiers. Lord Cornwallis's forces were believed to be even fewer. The resources used for the conquest and defense of such vast and valuable states were incredibly inadequate.

This unexpected movement gave a new aspect to affairs, and produced some irresolution in the British general respecting his future operations. After weighing the probable advantages and disadvantages of following Greene into South Carolina, he decided against this retrograde movement and determined to advance into Virginia.

This sudden change shook things up and made the British general uncertain about his next moves. After considering the possible pros and cons of chasing Greene into South Carolina, he chose not to backtrack and instead decided to push forward into Virginia.


CHAPTER X.

Virginia invaded by Arnold.... He destroys the stores at Westham and at Richmond.... Retires to Portsmouth.... Mutiny in the Pennsylvania line.... Sir H. Clinton attempts to negotiate with the mutineers.... They compromise with the civil government.... Mutiny in the Jersey line.... Mission of Colonel Laurens to France.... Propositions to Spain.... Recommendations relative to a duty on imported and prize goods.... Reform in the Executive departments.... Confederation adopted.... Military transactions.... Lafayette detached to Virginia.... Cornwallis arrives.... Presses Lafayette.... Expedition to Charlottesville, to the Point of Fork.... Lafayette forms a junction with Wayne.... Cornwallis retires to the lower country.... General Washington's letters are intercepted.... Action near Jamestown.

Virginia is invaded by Arnold.... He destroys the supplies at Westham and Richmond.... He retreats to Portsmouth.... There's a mutiny in the Pennsylvania line.... Sir H. Clinton tries to negotiate with the mutineers.... They reach a compromise with the civil government.... There's also a mutiny in the Jersey line.... Colonel Laurens is sent on a mission to France.... There are proposals to Spain.... Recommendations are made concerning a duty on imported and prize goods.... Reforms in the Executive departments.... The Confederation is adopted.... Military actions.... Lafayette is sent to Virginia.... Cornwallis arrives.... He pressures Lafayette.... There’s an expedition to Charlottesville, to the Point of Fork.... Lafayette joins forces with Wayne.... Cornwallis retreats to the southern region.... General Washington's letters are intercepted.... There’s action near Jamestown.

 

1781

The evacuation of Portsmouth by Leslie afforded Virginia but a short interval of repose. So early as the 9th of December, 1780, a letter from General Washington announced to the governor that a large embarkation, supposed to be destined for the south, was about taking place at New York. On the 30th, a fleet of transports under convoy, having on board between one and two thousand men, commanded by General Arnold, anchored in Hampton road. Virginia invaded by Arnold.The troops were embarked the next day on board vessels adapted to the navigation, and proceeded up James' River under convoy of two small ships of war. On the fourth of January they reached Westover, which is distant about twenty-five miles from Richmond, the capital of Virginia.[Pg 335]

The evacuation of Portsmouth by Leslie gave Virginia only a brief moment of peace. By December 9, 1780, a letter from General Washington informed the governor that a large troop movement, believed to be headed south, was about to occur in New York. On the 30th, a fleet of transport ships under escort, carrying between one and two thousand men led by General Arnold, dropped anchor in Hampton Roads. Virginia attacked by Arnold.The troops boarded vessels suited for navigation the next day and headed up James River with the protection of two small warships. By January 4, they arrived at Westover, which is about twenty-five miles from Richmond, the capital of Virginia.[Pg 335]

January 2.

On receiving intelligence that a fleet had entered the capes, General Nelson was employed in raising the militia of the lower country; and on the 2d of January orders were issued to call out those above the metropolis and in its neighbourhood.

On hearing that a fleet had entered the bays, General Nelson was busy organizing the local militia; and on January 2nd, orders were given to assemble those from areas above the city and nearby.

On reaching Westover, Arnold landed with the greater part of his army, and commenced his march towards Richmond. The few continental troops at Petersburg were ordered to the capital; and between one and two hundred militia, who had been collected from the town and its immediate vicinity, were directed to harass the advancing enemy.

On arriving at Westover, Arnold disembarked with most of his army and started his march toward Richmond. The small number of Continental troops at Petersburg were ordered to the capital, and about one or two hundred militia gathered from the town and surrounding areas were tasked with harassing the approaching enemy.

This party was too feeble for its object; and, the day after landing at Westover, Arnold entered Richmond, where he halted with about five hundred men. The residue, amounting to about four hundred, including thirty horse, proceeded under Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe to Westham, where they burnt a valuable foundry, boring mill, powder magazine, and other smaller buildings, with military stores to a considerable amount, and many valuable papers belonging to the government, which had been carried thither as to a place of safety.

This group was too weak for its purpose; and the day after arriving at Westover, Arnold entered Richmond, where he stopped with around five hundred men. The rest, totaling about four hundred, including thirty cavalry, went under Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe to Westham, where they set fire to a valuable foundry, a boring mill, a powder magazine, and several smaller buildings, along with a significant amount of military supplies and many important documents belonging to the government, which had been moved there for safekeeping.

He destroys valuable stores at Richmond.

This service being effected, Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe rejoined Arnold at Richmond; where the public stores, and a large quantity of rum and salt, the property of private individuals, were entirely destroyed.[Pg 336]

This service completed, Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe rejoined Arnold at Richmond, where the public supplies and a huge amount of rum and salt belonging to private individuals were completely destroyed.[Pg 336]

January.

Leaving Richmond the next day, the army returned to Westover[65] on the seventh; and, re-embarking on the morning of the tenth, proceeded down the river. It was followed by the Baron Steuben, who commanded in Virginia; and, near Hoods, Colonel Clarke drew a party of them into an ambuscade, and gave them one fire with some effect; but, on its being partially returned, the Americans broke and fled in the utmost confusion.[66]

Leaving Richmond the next day, the army went back to Westover[65] on the seventh; and, after getting back on the ships the morning of the tenth, they moved down the river. The Baron Steuben, who was in command in Virginia, followed them; and near Hoods, Colonel Clarke led a group of them into an ambush and managed to fire on them with some success; however, when the enemy fired back even slightly, the Americans broke and fled in complete chaos.[66]

Arnold proceeded slowly down the river; and on the twentieth reached Portsmouth, where he manifested the intention of establishing a permanent post.

Arnold made his way slowly down the river, and on the twentieth, he arrived in Portsmouth, where he showed his intention of setting up a permanent post.

The loss of the British in this expedition, was stated in the gazette of New York, at seven killed, including one subaltern, and twenty-three wounded, among whom was one captain. This small loss was sustained almost entirely in the ambuscade near Hoods.

The loss of the British in this expedition was reported in the New York Gazette as seven killed, including one officer, and twenty-three wounded, one of whom was a captain. This minor loss occurred almost entirely in the ambush near Hoods.

In the north, the year commenced with an event, which, for a time, threatened the American cause with total ruin.

In the north, the year started with an event that, for a while, put the American cause at serious risk of total failure.

The accumulated sufferings and privations of the army constitute a large and interesting part of the history of that war which gave independence to the United States. Winter, without[Pg 337] much lessening their toils, added to those sufferings. The soldiers were perpetually on the point of starving, were often entirely without food; were exposed without proper clothing to the rigours of the season, and had now served almost twelve months without pay.

The hardships and struggles faced by the army make up a significant and compelling part of the history of the war that led to American independence. Winter, without [Pg 337] easing their burdens, only increased their suffering. The soldiers were constantly on the verge of starvation, often completely without food; they were inadequately dressed for the harsh weather, and had now been serving for almost twelve months without any pay.

This state of things had been of such long continuance that scarcely the hope of a change could be indulged. It produced, unavoidably, some relaxation of discipline; and the murmurs, occasionally escaping the officers, sometimes heard by the soldiers, were not without their influence.

This situation had been going on for so long that hardly anyone could hope for a change. It inevitably led to a bit of a breakdown in discipline; the complaints that sometimes slipped out from the officers, which the soldiers occasionally overheard, definitely had an effect.

In addition to the general causes of dissatisfaction, the Pennsylvania line complained of a grievance almost peculiar to itself.

In addition to the usual reasons for dissatisfaction, the Pennsylvania line raised a complaint that was almost unique to them.

When congress directed enlistments to be made for three years, or during the war, the recruiting officers of Pennsylvania, in some instances, instead of engaging their men, definitively, for the one period or the other, engaged them generally for three years, or the war. This ambiguity in the terms of enlistment produced its natural effect. The soldier claimed his discharge at the expiration of three years, and the officer insisted on retaining him in service during the war. The soldier submitted with the more reluctance to the supposed imposition, as he constantly witnessed the immense bounties given to those who were not bound by a former enlistment.[Pg 338]

When Congress instructed that enlistments should be for three years or for the duration of the war, the recruiting officers in Pennsylvania sometimes engaged soldiers generally for three years or the war without committing them to a specific term. This ambiguity in the enlistment terms had predictable consequences. The soldier demanded to be discharged after three years, while the officer insisted on keeping him enlisted for as long as the war lasted. The soldier was increasingly frustrated by what he saw as unfairness, especially as he observed the large bounties given to those not tied to a previous enlistment.[Pg 338]

Mutiny in the Pennsylvania line.

The discontents which these various causes had been long fomenting, broke out on the night of the 1st of January, in an open and almost universal revolt of the line.

The frustrations caused by these various factors had been building up for a long time and erupted on the night of January 1st in a widespread and nearly universal uprising of the troops.

On a signal given, the great body of the non-commissioned officers and privates paraded under arms, avowing the determination to march to the seat of congress, and either obtain redress of their complicated grievances, or serve no longer. In the attempt to suppress the mutiny, six or seven of the mutineers were wounded on the one side; and on the other, Captain Billing was killed, and several other officers were dangerously wounded. The authority of General Wayne availed nothing. On cocking his pistol, and threatening some of the most turbulent, the bayonet was presented to his bosom; and he perceived that strong measures would produce his own destruction, and perhaps the massacre of every officer in camp. A few regiments who did not at first join the mutineers, were paraded by their officers; but, had they even been willing to proceed to extremities, they were not strong enough to restore order. Infected quickly with the general contagion, or intimidated by the threats of the mutineers, they joined their comrades; and the whole body, consisting of about thirteen hundred men, with six field pieces, marched, under the command of their sergeants, towards Princeton.[Pg 339]

On a given signal, the large group of non-commissioned officers and privates gathered with their weapons, declaring their intent to march to Congress and either get their complicated grievances addressed or stop serving altogether. In an attempt to quell the mutiny, six or seven of the mutineers were wounded on one side; on the other, Captain Billing was killed, and several other officers were seriously injured. General Wayne's authority had no effect. When he cocked his pistol and threatened some of the most unruly, a bayonet was aimed at his chest; he realized that taking strong action would likely lead to his own death and possibly the slaughter of every officer in the camp. A few regiments that initially did not side with the mutineers were assembled by their officers; however, even if they wanted to take drastic action, they were not strong enough to restore order. Quickly influenced by the widespread discontent or intimidated by the mutineers' threats, they joined their fellow soldiers. Ultimately, the entire group, about thirteen hundred men with six cannons, marched towards Princeton under the leadership of their sergeants.[Pg 339]

The next day. General Wayne, accompanied by Colonels Butler and Stewart, officers possessing, in a high degree, the affections of the soldiery, followed them, in the hope of bringing them back to their duty, or at least of dividing them. They were overtaken near Middlebrook, and invited by a written message from General Wayne, to appoint one man from each regiment to state the grievances of which they complained.

The next day. General Wayne, along with Colonels Butler and Stewart, who were well-liked by the soldiers, went after them, hoping to bring them back to their responsibilities or at least split them up. They caught up to them near Middlebrook and sent a written message from General Wayne, inviting them to choose one person from each regiment to express the grievances they had.

In consequence of this invitation, a sergeant from each regiment met the officers at their quarters, and some verbal communications were made, from the complexion of which sanguine hopes were entertained that the affair might be terminated without farther hazard, or much injury to the service.

As a result of this invitation, a sergeant from each regiment met the officers at their quarters, and some verbal exchanges took place, which gave rise to optimistic hopes that the situation could be resolved without further risk or significant harm to the service.

On the following day, the line of march was resumed, and the soldiers proceeded to Princeton. The propositions of the general and field officers were reported to them, and a committee of sergeants, to whom they were referred, stated their claims. These were,

On the next day, the march continued, and the soldiers headed to Princeton. The proposals from the general and field officers were shared with them, and a committee of sergeants, who reviewed them, presented their claims. These were,

1st. A discharge for all those who had served three years under their original engagements, whatever those engagements might have been, and who had not taken the increased bounty, and re-enlisted for the war.

1st. A discharge for everyone who had served three years under their original contracts, regardless of what those contracts were, and who had not accepted the increased bonus and re-enlisted for the war.

2nd. An immediate payment of all their arrears of pay and clothing, as well to those who[Pg 340] should be discharged, as to those who should continue in service.

2nd. An immediate payment of all their unpaid wages and clothing, both to those who[Pg 340] will be discharged and to those who will continue in service.

3rd. The residue of their bounty, and future real pay to those who should continue in the army.

3rd. The leftover of their benefits and future pay for those who choose to stay in the army.

General Wayne being unwilling to discharge all those who had not re-enlisted for the war, the subject was referred to the civil power.

General Wayne was hesitant to fire everyone who hadn't re-enlisted for the war, so the issue was handed over to the civil authorities.

On receiving intelligence of the mutiny, congress appointed a committee to confer with the executive of Pennsylvania respecting it. The result of this conference was that both the committee, and the governor with some members of the executive council, left Philadelphia for the purpose of endeavouring to accommodate this dangerous commotion.

On receiving news of the mutiny, Congress appointed a committee to talk with the executive of Pennsylvania about it. The outcome of this discussion was that both the committee and the governor, along with some members of the executive council, left Philadelphia to try to resolve this serious situation.

At his head quarters, at New Windsor, on the North River, General Washington received intelligence of this alarming mutiny. Accustomed as he had been to contemplate hazardous and difficult situations, it was not easy, under existing circumstances, to resolve instantly on the course it was most prudent to pursue. His first impression—to repair to the camp of the mutineers—soon gave place to opinions which were formed on more mature reflection.

At his headquarters in New Windsor on the North River, General Washington received news about this concerning mutiny. While he was used to dealing with risky and challenging situations, it wasn't easy to quickly decide on the best course of action given the circumstances. His initial thought—to go to the camp of the mutineers—was soon replaced by opinions formed after more careful consideration.

It was almost certain that the business was already in the hands of the civil government, with whose arrangements it might be improper for him to interfere. Independent of this con[Pg 341]sideration, other motives of irresistible influence detained him on the North River.

It was almost certain that the business was already under the control of the civil government, and it might be inappropriate for him to get involved with their arrangements. Besides this consideration, other compelling reasons kept him on the North River.

The most important among those subjects of complaint which were alleged as the causes of the mutiny, were true in fact, were common to the whole army, and were of a nature to disseminate too generally those seeds of disquiet, which had attained their full growth and maturity in the Pennsylvania line. Strong symptoms of discontent had already been manifested; and it was, therefore, impossible to say with confidence, how far the same temper existed among the other troops; or how far the contagion of example had or would spread.

The most significant of the complaints that were claimed to cause the mutiny were actually true, were shared across the entire army, and were likely to spread the seeds of unrest that had fully developed in the Pennsylvania line. Clear signs of dissatisfaction had already been shown; therefore, it was impossible to confidently assess how widespread this attitude was among the other troops or how much the influence of their behavior had spread or would spread.

The danger arising from this state of things was much increased by the circumstance that the river was perfectly open, and afforded Sir Henry Clinton an easy and rapid transportation for his army to West Point, should the situation of its garrison invite an enterprise against that post.

The danger from this situation was greatly heightened by the fact that the river was completely open, allowing Sir Henry Clinton quick and easy movement of his army to West Point if the garrison's situation called for an attack on that location.

It was an additional consideration of great weight, that it might have a most pernicious influence on the discipline of the whole army, should the authority of the Commander-in-chief be disregarded. He ought not to place himself in a situation where his orders might be disobeyed with impunity; an event much to be apprehended, should he repair to the camp of the mutineers, unattended by a military force adequate to the occasion.[Pg 342]

It was a significant concern that ignoring the authority of the Commander-in-chief could seriously undermine the discipline of the entire army. He shouldn't put himself in a position where his orders could be ignored without consequences; this was particularly likely if he went to the camp of the mutineers without a sufficient military presence to handle the situation.[Pg 342]

Such a force could not be immediately commanded. His effectives in the Highlands amounted only to thirteen hundred and seventy-six men; and that whole division of the army, dispersed at various and distant stations, excluding the sick and those on furlough, did not exceed four thousand. Assuming therefore the fidelity of the troops, it was impracticable to march immediately with a force sufficient to reduce the Pennsylvania line, without leaving the Highlands undefended. Nor was it unworthy of consideration that, in the actual situation of the mutineers, the probability of their being attacked by such a force might drive them to the enemy, or disperse them, events, either of which would deprive the army of a valuable part of its strength.

Such a force couldn’t be instantly commanded. His active troops in the Highlands numbered only thirteen hundred and seventy-six men; and that entire division of the army, spread out across various and distant locations, including the sick and those on leave, didn’t go beyond four thousand. Assuming the loyalty of the soldiers, it was impractical to march right away with a force strong enough to take on the Pennsylvania line without leaving the Highlands unprotected. It was also worth noting that, given the current situation of the mutineers, the chance of them being attacked by such a force could push them to the enemy or cause them to scatter, either of which would rob the army of a significant part of its strength.

It was therefore thought adviseable to leave the negotiation with the civil power, and to prepare for those measures which ought to be adopted in the event of its failure. The disposition of the troops on the North River was sounded, and found to be favourable; after which, a detachment of eleven hundred men was ordered to be in readiness to move on a moment's warning. On the first notice of the mutiny, the militia of Jersey took the field under General Dickenson, and measures were taken to call out those of New York should the occasion require it.

It was deemed wise to leave the negotiation with the local authorities and to prepare for the actions that needed to be taken if it failed. The placement of the troops along the North River was assessed and found to be favorable; afterward, a group of eleven hundred men was instructed to be ready to move at a moment's notice. As soon as the mutiny was reported, the militia from Jersey mobilized under General Dickenson, and plans were made to activate the New York militia if necessary.

Sir Henry Clinton attempts to negotiate with the mutineers.

To avail himself of an event appearing so auspicious to the royal cause, Sir Henry Clinton[Pg 343] ordered a large body of troops to be in readiness to move on the shortest notice; and despatched three emissaries with tempting offers to the revolters; and instructions to invite them, while the negotiation should be depending, to take a position behind the South River, where they should be effectually covered by detachments from New York. While these measures were taking, Sir Henry kept his eye on West Point, and held himself in readiness to strike at that place, should any movement on the part of General Washington open to him a prospect of success.[67]

To take advantage of an opportunity that seemed so favorable to the royal cause, Sir Henry Clinton[Pg 343] ordered a large group of troops to be ready to move on short notice and sent three agents with attractive offers to the rebels, along with instructions to encourage them, while negotiations were ongoing, to take a position behind the South River, where they would be effectively supported by detachments from New York. While these actions were in progress, Sir Henry kept an eye on West Point and prepared himself to strike at that location if any movement from General Washington presented a chance for success.[67]

His emissaries were immediately seized by the revolters, and their proposals communicated to General Wayne, with assurances of the utter detestation in which every idea of going over to the common enemy was held.

His messengers were quickly captured by the rebels, and their suggestions were relayed to General Wayne, along with guarantees that any notion of switching sides to the common enemy was completely despised.

This favourable symptom, however, was accompanied by suspicious circumstances. They retained the British emissaries in their own possession; and could not be induced to cross the Delaware, or to march from Princeton. They would not permit any of their former officers, other than those already mentioned, to enter their camp; and General St. Clair, the Marquis de Lafayette, and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, were ordered to leave Princeton.

This positive sign, however, came with some concerning circumstances. They kept the British messengers in their control and wouldn’t agree to cross the Delaware or move from Princeton. They wouldn’t allow any of their past officers, besides those already mentioned, to enter their camp; and General St. Clair, the Marquis de Lafayette, and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens were instructed to leave Princeton.

Such was the state of things when the committee of congress, and President Read with a[Pg 344] part of his executive council, arrived in the neighbourhood of the revolters. The former having delegated their power to the latter, a conference was held with the sergeants who now commanded, after which proposals were made and distributed among the troops for consideration.

Such was the situation when the congressional committee, along with President Read and some of his executive council, arrived near the rebels. The committee had delegated their authority to the council, which then held a meeting with the sergeants who were now in command. After that, proposals were made and shared with the troops for their consideration.

In these proposals the government offered,

In these proposals, the government offered,

1st. To discharge all those who had enlisted indefinitely for three years or during the war, the fact to be examined into by three commissioners, to be appointed by the executive; and to be ascertained, when the original enlistment could not be produced, by the oath of the soldier.

1st. To release everyone who had enlisted indefinitely for three years or for the duration of the war, this matter will be investigated by three commissioners appointed by the executive; and when the original enlistment cannot be presented, confirmation will be obtained through the soldier's oath.

2dly. To give immediate certificates for the depreciation on their pay, and to settle the arrearages as soon as circumstances would admit.

2dly. To provide immediate certificates for the reduction in their pay, and to clear the outstanding amounts as soon as conditions allow.

3dly. To furnish them immediately with certain specified articles of clothing which were most wanted.

3rd. To provide them right away with specific items of clothing that were in high demand.

They compromise with the civil authority.

On receiving these propositions, the troops agreed to march to Trenton. At that place the terms were accepted, with the addition that three commissioners should also be deputed by the line, who, conjointly with those of the executive should constitute the board authorized to determine on the claims of the soldiers to be discharged; and thereupon the British emissaries were surrendered, who were tried, condemned, and executed as spies.[Pg 345]

Upon receiving these proposals, the troops agreed to march to Trenton. There, the terms were accepted, with the condition that three representatives would also be appointed by the line, who, along with the executive members, would make up the board responsible for deciding the soldiers' eligibility for discharge; subsequently, the British emissaries were handed over, tried, condemned, and executed as spies.[Pg 345]

Until the investigation should be made, and discharges given to those who should be found entitled to them, the sergeants retained their command. In consequence of the irksomeness of this state of things, the business was pressed with so much precipitation, that before the enlistments themselves could be brought from the huts, almost the whole of the artillery, and of the five first regiments of infantry, were liberated on the testimony of their own oaths. The enlistments being then produced, it was found that not many of the remaining regiments had engaged on the terms which, under the compact, would entitle them to leave the service; and that, of those actually dismissed, far the greater number had been enlisted absolutely for the war. The discharges given, however, were not cancelled; and the few who were to remain in service received furloughs for forty days.

Until the investigation was completed and discharges were issued to those entitled to them, the sergeants kept their command. Due to the frustration of this situation, the process was rushed so much that before the enlistments could even be retrieved from the huts, nearly all of the artillery and five of the first infantry regiments were released based on their own sworn statements. When the enlistments were finally presented, it turned out that not many of the remaining regiments had signed up under the conditions that would allow them to leave the service, and among those actually dismissed, the vast majority had enlisted specifically for the war. However, the discharges issued were not revoked, and the few who were to stay in service received forty-day leaves.

Thus ended, in a temporary dissolution of the whole line of Pennsylvania, a mutiny, which a voluntary performance of much less than was extorted, would have prevented; and which, in the actual condition of the army, was of a nature and extent to inspire the most serious alarm.

Thus ended, in a temporary breakdown of the entire line of Pennsylvania, a mutiny that could have been avoided if the performance had been voluntary and significantly less than what was demanded. Given the current state of the army, this situation was serious enough to cause significant concern.

The dangerous policy of yielding even to the just demands of soldiers made with arms in their hands, was soon illustrated. Mutiny in the Jersey line.The success of the Pennsylvania line inspired that of Jersey, many of whom were also foreigners, with the hope of obtaining similar advantages. On the night of[Pg 346] the 20th, a part of the Jersey brigade, which had been stationed at Pompton, rose in arms; and, making precisely the same claims which had been yielded to the Pennsylvanians, marched to Chatham, where a part of the same brigade was cantoned, in the hope of exciting them also to join in the revolt.

The risky choice to give in to the rightful demands of soldiers armed and ready quickly became clear. Rebellion in the Jersey line. The success of the Pennsylvania line boosted the Jersey troops, many of whom were also foreigners, with hopes of achieving the same benefits. On the night of [Pg 346] the 20th, some members of the Jersey brigade stationed in Pompton rose up; they made the same demands that had been met for the Pennsylvanians and marched to Chatham, where part of their brigade was stationed, hoping to persuade them to join the uprising.

General Washington, who had been extremely chagrined at the issue of the mutiny in the Pennsylvania line, and who was now assured of the confidence to be placed in the fidelity of the eastern troops, who were composed of natives, determined, by strong measures, to stop the farther progress of a spirit which threatened the destruction of the army, and ordered a detachment to march against the mutineers, and to bring them to unconditional submission. General Howe, who commanded this detachment, was instructed to make no terms with the insurgents while in a state of resistance; and, as soon as they should surrender, to seize a few of the most active leaders, and to execute them on the spot. These orders were promptly obeyed, and the Jersey mutineers returned to their duty.

General Washington, who was really upset about the mutiny in the Pennsylvania line and now had faith in the loyalty of the eastern troops made up of locals, decided to take strong action to put an end to a spirit that threatened the army's survival. He ordered a team to march against the mutineers and force them to submit unconditionally. General Howe, who led this team, was told to make no deals with the rebels while they were still resisting; and as soon as they surrendered, to capture a few of the most active leaders and execute them right then and there. These orders were quickly carried out, and the Jersey mutineers returned to their duties.

In the hope of being more successful with the revolters of Jersey than he had been with those of Pennsylvania, Sir Henry Clinton offered them the same terms which had been proposed to the mutineers at Princeton; and General Robertson, at the head of three thou[Pg 347]sand men, was detached to Staten Island with the avowed purpose of crossing over into Jersey, and covering any movement which they might make towards New York. The emissary, being in the American interest, delivered his papers to the officer commanding at the first station to which he came. Other papers were dispersed among the mutineers; but the mutiny was crushed too suddenly to allow time for the operation of these propositions.

In the hope of having better luck with the rebels in Jersey than he did with those in Pennsylvania, Sir Henry Clinton offered them the same terms that had been suggested to the mutineers at Princeton. General Robertson, leading three thousand men, was sent to Staten Island with the clear aim of crossing into Jersey and backing any moves they might make towards New York. The messenger, supporting the American side, handed his documents to the officer in charge at the first station he reached. Other documents were shared among the rebels, but the uprising was shut down so quickly that there wasn't any time to consider these proposals.

The vigorous measures taken in this instance were happily followed by such an attention on the part of the states, to the actual situation of the army, as checked the progress of discontent. Influenced by the representations of the Commander-in-chief, they raised three months' pay in specie, which they forwarded to the soldiers, who received it with joy, considering it as evidence that their fellow citizens were not entirely unmindful of their sufferings.

The strong actions taken in this case were thankfully matched by the states' focus on the army's current situation, which helped to curb the growing discontent. Prompted by the Chief Commander's reports, they provided three months' pay in cash, which they sent to the soldiers. The soldiers welcomed it with happiness, seeing it as proof that their fellow citizens hadn’t completely forgotten about their hardships.

Although the army was thus reduced to such extreme distress, the discontents of the people were daily multiplied by the contributions which they were required to make, and by the irritating manner in which those contributions were drawn from them. Every article for public use was obtained by impressment; and the taxes were either unpaid, or collected by coercive means. Strong remonstrances were made against this system; and the dissatisfaction which pervaded the mass of the community, was scarcely less[Pg 348] dangerous than that which had been manifested by the army.

Although the army was in extreme distress, the people's discontent was growing daily due to the contributions they were forced to make and the annoying way those contributions were collected. Every item needed for public use was taken by force, and taxes were either unpaid or collected through coercion. There were strong protests against this system, and the dissatisfaction spreading throughout the community was almost as dangerous as that shown by the army.[Pg 348]

To the judicious patriots throughout America, the necessity of giving greater powers to the federal government became every day more apparent; but the efforts of enlightened individuals were too feeble to correct that fatal disposition of power which had been made by enthusiasm uninstructed by experience.

To the wise patriots across America, the need to grant more power to the federal government became more obvious each day; however, the attempts of informed individuals were too weak to fix that dangerous shift in power caused by enthusiasm lacking real experience.

To relieve the United States from their complicated embarrassments, a foreign loan seemed an expedient of indispensable necessity, and from France they hoped to obtain it. Mission of Colonel Laurens to France.Congress selected Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, a gentleman whose situation in the family of the Commander-in-chief had enabled him to take a comprehensive view of the military capacities and weaknesses of his country, for this interesting service; and instructed him also to urge the advantage of maintaining a naval superiority in the American seas. Before his departure, he passed some days at headquarters, and received from General Washington in the form of a letter, the result of his reflections on the existing state of things.

To help the United States out of their complicated troubles, getting a foreign loan seemed absolutely necessary, and they hoped to secure it from France. Colonel Laurens' Mission to France. Congress chose Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, a man who had gained a broad perspective on the military strengths and weaknesses of his country while working closely with the Commander-in-chief, for this important mission. He was also tasked with promoting the benefits of maintaining naval superiority in American waters. Before he left, he spent a few days at headquarters and received a letter from General Washington that outlined his thoughts on the current situation.

In this paper he detailed the pecuniary embarrassments of the government, and represented, with great earnestness, the inability of the nation to furnish a revenue adequate to the support of the war. He dwelt on the discontents which the system of impressment had[Pg 349] excited among the people, and expressed his fears that the evils felt in the prosecution of the war, might weaken the sentiments which began it.

In this paper, he outlined the financial troubles of the government and emphasized the nation's inability to generate enough revenue to support the war. He discussed the dissatisfaction caused by the impressment system, which had[Pg 349] upset the people, and voiced his concerns that the hardships experienced during the war could diminish the support that initially fueled it.

From this state of things, he deduced the vital importance of an immediate and ample supply of money, which might be the foundation for substantial arrangements of finance, for reviving public credit, and giving vigour to future operations; as well as of a decided effort of the allied arms on the continent to effect the great objects of the alliance, in the ensuing campaign.

From this situation, he concluded that having a quick and sufficient amount of money was crucial. This could serve as the basis for solid financial plans, restoring public confidence, and energizing future actions, as well as a strong push from the allied forces on the continent to achieve the main goals of the alliance in the upcoming campaign.

Next to a supply of money, he considered a naval superiority in the American seas, as an object of the deepest interest.

Next to having enough money, he saw naval dominance in American waters as something of great importance.

To the United States, it would be of decisive importance, and France also might derive great advantages from transferring the maritime war to the coast of her ally.

To the United States, it would be crucial, and France could also gain significant benefits from moving the naval war to the shores of her ally.

The future ability of the United States to repay any loan which might now be obtained was displayed; and he concluded with assurances that there was still a fund of inclination and resource in the country, equal to great and continued exertions, provided the means were afforded of stopping the progress of disgust, by changing the present system, and adopting another more consonant with the spirit of the nation, and more capable of infusing activity and energy into public measures; of which a powerful succour in money must be the basis. "The[Pg 350] people were discontented, but it was with the feeble and oppressive mode of conducting the war, not with the war itself."

The future ability of the United States to repay any loan that might be obtained now was demonstrated; and he ended with assurances that there was still a reservoir of willingness and resources in the country, enough for significant and ongoing efforts, as long as the means were provided to stop the growing frustration by changing the current system and adopting one that better aligns with the spirit of the nation and is more capable of injecting activity and energy into public initiatives, with a strong financial support as the foundation. "The[Pg 350] people were unhappy, but it was with the weak and oppressive way of waging the war, not with the war itself."

With reason did the Commander-in-chief thus urge on the cabinet of Versailles, the policy of advancing a sum of money to the United States which might be adequate to the exigency. Deep was the gloom with which their political horizon was overcast. The British, in possession of South Carolina and of Georgia, had overrun the greater part of North Carolina also; and it was with equal hazard and address that Greene maintained himself in the northern frontier of that state.

With good reason, the Commander-in-chief urged the cabinet of Versailles to provide a sum of money to the United States that would be sufficient for the situation. Their political outlook was very bleak. The British had taken control of South Carolina and Georgia and had also invaded most of North Carolina; Greene was skillfully managing to hold his ground on the northern frontier of that state despite the risks.

A second detachment from New York was making a deep impression on Virginia, where the resistance had been neither so prompt nor so vigorous[68] as the strength of that state and the unanimity of its citizens had given reason to expect.

A second group from New York was making a strong impression on Virginia, where the resistance had been neither as quick nor as intense[68] as the state’s strength and the unity of its citizens had led people to expect.

The perplexities and difficulties in which the affairs of America were involved, were estimated by the British government even above their real value. Intercepted letters of this date from the minister, expressed the most sanguine hopes that the great superiority of force at the disposal of Sir Henry Clinton, would compel Washington with his feeble army to take refuge on the eastern side of the Hudson.[Pg 351]

The complexities and challenges surrounding America's situation were seen by the British government as even more significant than they actually were. Intercepted letters from the minister during this time showed very optimistic expectations that Sir Henry Clinton's overwhelming force would force Washington and his weak army to retreat to the eastern side of the Hudson.[Pg 351]

Even congress relaxed for an instant from its habitual firmness; and, receding from the decisive manner in which that body had insisted on the territorial and maritime rights of the nation, directed the American minister at Madrid to relinquish, if it should be absolutely necessary, the claims of the United States to navigate the Mississippi below the thirty-first degree of north latitude, and to a free port on the banks of that river within the Spanish territory. It is remarkable that only Massachusetts, Connecticut, and North Carolina, dissented from this resolution; New York was divided.[69] Propositions to Spain.On a subsequent day, the subject was again brought forward, and a proposition was made for still farther concessions to Spain; but this proposition was negatived by all the states.[70]

Even Congress took a moment to relax its usual firmness; stepping back from the strong stance it had taken on the country's territorial and maritime rights, it instructed the American minister in Madrid to give up, if absolutely necessary, the U.S. claims to navigate the Mississippi River below the thirty-first degree of north latitude and the right to a free port on that river within Spanish territory. It's notable that only Massachusetts, Connecticut, and North Carolina opposed this resolution; New York was split.[69] Proposals for Spain.On a later day, the issue was raised again, and a proposal was made for even further concessions to Spain; however, this proposal was rejected by all the states.[70]

Happily for the United States, Mr. Jay, their minister at the court of Madrid, required as the price of the concessions he was instructed to make, that the treaty he was labouring to negotiate should be immediately concluded.

Happily for the United States, Mr. Jay, their minister at the court of Madrid, insisted that the treaty he was working to negotiate should be finalized right away, as the price for the concessions he was directed to make.

The establishment of a revenue subject to the exclusive control and direction of the continental government, was connected inseparably with the restoration of credit. The efforts therefore to negotiate a foreign loan were accompanied[Pg 352] by resolutions requesting the respective states to place a fund under the control of congress, which should be both permanent and productive. Recommendations relative to a duty on imported and prize goods.A resolution was passed, recommending to the respective states to vest a power in congress to levy for the use of the United States a duty of five per centum ad valorem on all goods imported into any of them; and also on all prizes condemned in any of the American courts of admiralty.

The creation of a revenue system that was entirely under the authority of the federal government was closely tied to restoring trust in the economy. Therefore, efforts to secure a foreign loan were accompanied[Pg 352] by resolutions urging the states to set up a fund managed by Congress that would be both permanent and productive. Recommendations concerning a tax on imported goods and rewards. A resolution was passed, recommending that the states give Congress the power to impose a five percent tax on the value of all goods imported into any of them, as well as on all prizes that were seized by any American courts of admiralty.

This fund was to be appropriated to the payment of both the principal and interest of all debts contracted in the prosecution of the war; and was to continue until those debts should be completely discharged.

This fund was intended to cover the payment of both the principal and interest on all debts incurred during the war; it was to remain in place until those debts were fully paid off.

Congress, at that time, contained several members who perceived the advantages which would result from bestowing on the government of the nation the full power of regulating commerce, and, consequently, of increasing the import as circumstances might render adviseable; but state influence predominated, and they were overruled by great majorities. Even the inadequate plan which they did recommend was never adopted. Notwithstanding the greatness of the exigency, and the pressure of the national wants, never, during the existence of the confederation, did all the states unite in assenting to this recommendation; so unwilling are men possessed of power, to place it in the hands of others.[Pg 353]

Congress at that time had several members who saw the benefits of giving the national government the full authority to regulate commerce, which would also allow for increasing imports as needed. However, state influence was strong, and they were overshadowed by large majorities. The insufficient plan they suggested was never adopted. Despite the urgency of the situation and the nation's pressing needs, there was never a time during the confederation when all the states agreed to this recommendation; people in power are often reluctant to hand it over to others.[Pg 353]

Reform in the organization of the executive departments.

About the same time a reform was introduced into the administration, the necessity of which had been long perceived. From a misplaced prejudice against institutions sanctioned by experience, all the great executive duties had been devolved either on committees of congress, or on boards consisting of several members. This unwieldy and expensive system had maintained itself against all the efforts of reason and public utility. But the scantiness of the national means at length prevailed over prejudice, and the several committees and boards yielded to a secretary for foreign affairs, a superintendent of finance, a secretary of war, and a secretary of marine. But so miserably defective was the organization of congress, as an executive body, that the year had far advanced before this measure, the utility of which all acknowledged, could be carried into complete operation by making all the appointments.

Around the same time, a much-needed reform was introduced in the administration. Due to an unfounded bias against institutions that had proven effective, all of the major executive responsibilities had been assigned to either congressional committees or boards made up of multiple members. This clunky and costly system persisted despite various attempts to reason against it and promote public benefit. However, the lack of national resources eventually overcame this bias, leading to the establishment of roles for a secretary of foreign affairs, a superintendent of finance, a secretary of war, and a secretary of the navy. Yet, the organization of congress as an executive body was so poorly structured that it took most of the year to fully implement this necessary measure, with all the appointments finally made.

Confederation adopted.

About this time the articles of confederation were ratified. Much difficulty was encountered in obtaining the adoption of this instrument. The numerous objections made by the states yielded successively to the opinion that a federal compact would be of vast importance in the prosecution of the war. One impediment it was found peculiarly difficult to remove. Within the chartered limits of several states, were immense tracts of vacant territory, which, it was supposed, would constitute a large fund of fu[Pg 354]ture wealth; and the states not possessing that advantage insisted on considering this territory as a joint acquisition. At length this difficulty also was surmounted; and, in February, 1781, to the great joy of America, this interesting compact was rendered complete.[71] Like many other human institutions, it was productive, neither in war nor in peace, of all the benefits which its sanguine advocates had expected. Had peace been made before any agreement for a permanent union was formed, it is far from being improbable that the different parts might have fallen asunder, and a dismemberment have taken place.[Pg 355] If the confederation really preserved the idea of union until the good sense of the nation adopted a more efficient system, this service alone entitles that instrument to the respectful recollection of the American people, and its framers to their gratitude.

Around this time, the Articles of Confederation were ratified. It was quite challenging to get this agreement accepted. The many objections from the states gradually gave way to the belief that a federal compact would be crucial for continuing the war. However, one obstacle proved particularly hard to overcome. Several states had vast areas of unoccupied land that were thought to represent a significant potential source of future wealth, and the states that didn’t have this advantage insisted that this land should be considered a shared resource. Eventually, this issue was resolved; and in February 1781, to the great delight of America, this important agreement was finalized.[71] Like many human institutions, it did not deliver all the benefits that its optimistic supporters had anticipated, neither in war nor in peace. If peace had been established before any agreement for a permanent union was made, it’s quite possible that the various regions could have separated, leading to disunion.[Pg 355] If the confederation truly maintained the concept of unity until the common sense of the nation could adopt a stronger system, then this alone earns that document a respectful place in the memories of the American people, and its creators their gratitude.

Military transactions.

Such was the defensive strength of the positions taken by the adverse armies on the Hudson, and such their relative force, that no decisive blow could be given by either in that quarter of the continent. The anxious attentions of General Washington, therefore, were unremittingly directed to the south. One of[Pg 356] those incidents which fortune occasionally produces, on the seizing or neglect of which the greatest military events frequently depend, presented, sooner than was expected, an opportunity which he deemed capable of being improved to the destruction of the British army in Virginia.

The defensive strength of the positions taken by the opposing armies on the Hudson was so great, and their relative force so balanced, that neither side could land a decisive blow in that part of the continent. Therefore, General Washington’s attention was constantly focused on the south. One of[Pg 356] those events that fortune occasionally throws our way, which can significantly impact major military outcomes, unexpectedly presented an opportunity that he believed could be leveraged to destroy the British army in Virginia.

The French fleet, from its arrival on the American coast, had been blocked up in the harbour of Newport; and the land forces of that nation had been reduced to a state of inactivity by the necessity of defending their ships. Late in January, a detachment from the British fleet[Pg 357] was encountered on the east end of Long Island by a furious storm, in which such damage was sustained as to destroy for a time the naval superiority which Arbuthnot had uniformly preserved.

The French fleet had been stuck in Newport harbor since it arrived on the American coast, and the land forces from France were forced into inactivity because they had to protect their ships. In late January, a British fleet detachment[Pg 357] ran into a fierce storm at the east end of Long Island, causing so much damage that it temporarily weakened the naval dominance that Arbuthnot had consistently maintained.

To turn this temporary superiority to advantage, Monsieur Destouches resolved to detach a ship of the line, with two frigates, to the Chesapeake; a force which the delegation from Virginia had assured him would be sufficient for the purpose.

To make the most of this temporary advantage, Mr. Destouches decided to send a warship and two frigates to the Chesapeake, a force that the delegation from Virginia had promised would be enough for the task.

On receiving certain accounts of the loss sustained in the storm, General Washington con[Pg 358]ceived the design of improving that circumstance by immediate and powerful operations against Arnold. Confident that the critical moment must be seized, or the enterprise would fail, he ordered a detachment of twelve hundred men, under the command of the Marquis de Lafayette, to the head of the Chesapeake; there to embark for that part of Virginia which was to become the theatre of action, under convoy of a French frigate, for which he applied to the admiral. He immediately communicated this measure to the Count de Rochambeau, and to Monsieur Destouches, to whom he also stated his conviction that no serious advantage could be expected from a few ships, unaided by land troops. "There were," he said, "a variety of positions to be taken by Arnold, one of which was Portsmouth, his present station, where his ships might be so protected by his batteries on the shore as to defy a mere naval attack; and[Pg 359] where he would certainly be able to maintain himself until the losses sustained in the late storm should be repaired, and the superiority at sea recovered, when he would unquestionably be relieved."

Upon receiving reports about the losses from the storm, General Washington envisioned taking advantage of the situation by launching immediate and strong actions against Arnold. Confident that the critical moment needed to be seized or the mission would fail, he ordered a group of twelve hundred men, led by the Marquis de Lafayette, to the head of the Chesapeake Bay; there, they would board ships to head toward the part of Virginia that would become the battleground, accompanied by a French frigate, for which he requested the admiral's support. He promptly informed Count de Rochambeau and Monsieur Destouches of this plan, expressing his belief that no significant advantage could be gained from a few ships without support from land troops. "There are," he stated, "several positions that Arnold could take, one of which is Portsmouth, his current location, where his ships could be shielded by coastal batteries, making them impervious to a simple naval attack; and where he would undoubtedly be able to hold his ground until the damages from the recent storm were repaired and the superiority at sea was restored, at which point he would certainly be relieved."

To insure the success of the expedition, he recommended that the whole fleet should be employed on it, and that a detachment of one thousand men should be embarked for the same service.

To ensure the success of the expedition, he suggested that the entire fleet be used for it, and that a group of one thousand men be sent on the same mission.

February 9.

These representations did not prevail. The original plan had already been put in execution. On the 9th of February, a sixty-four gun ship with two frigates, under Monsieur de Tilley, had sailed for the Chesapeake; and, as some of the British ships had been repaired, the French admiral did not think it prudent to put to sea with the residue of his fleet.

These plans didn’t work out. The original plan was already being carried out. On February 9th, a sixty-four-gun ship and two frigates, led by Monsieur de Tilley, set sail for the Chesapeake; and since some of the British ships had been repaired, the French admiral didn’t think it was wise to send the rest of his fleet out to sea.

As had been foreseen by General Washington, de Tilley found Arnold in a situation not to be assailed with any prospect of success. After showing himself therefore in the bay, and making an ineffectual attempt to enter Elizabeth River, he returned to Newport. At the capes, he fell in with the Romulus, a fifty gun ship, coming from Charleston to the Chesapeake, which he captured.

As General Washington had predicted, de Tilley found Arnold in a position that couldn’t be attacked successfully. After showing up in the bay and making a futile attempt to enter the Elizabeth River, he went back to Newport. At the capes, he encountered the Romulus, a fifty-gun ship coming from Charleston to the Chesapeake, which he captured.

Both the Count de Rochambeau, and the Chevalier Destouches, being well disposed to execute the plans suggested by General Washington, they determined, on the return of Mon[Pg 360]sieur de Tilley, to make a second expedition to the Chesapeake with the whole fleet, and eleven hundred men. General Washington, therefore, hastened to Newport, that in a personal conference with them, he might facilitate the execution of an enterprise from which he still entertained sanguine hopes.

Both Count de Rochambeau and Chevalier Destouches were eager to carry out the plans proposed by General Washington. They decided that when Monsieur de Tilley returned, they would launch a second expedition to the Chesapeake with the entire fleet and eleven hundred men. General Washington quickly went to Newport to meet with them in person, hoping to help make the operation happen, as he still had high hopes for its success.

March 6.

Early on the 6th of March he reached Newport, and went instantly on board the Admiral, where he was met by the Count de Rochambeau. It was determined that a detachment from the army, then in perfect readiness, should be embarked under the Count de Viominil; and that the fleet should put to sea as soon as possible. The wind was favourable to the French, and adverse to the British. Yet the fleet did not sail until the evening of the eighth. It appears from a letter of Monsieur Destouches, that this delay was in some measure attributable to a disaster which befel one of his frigates in getting out of port; and there is reason to suppose that it may be ascribed to a want of supplies. Whatever may have been the cause, Arnold is most probably indebted to it for his escape from the fate which his treason merited.

Early on March 6th, he arrived in Newport and immediately boarded the Admiral, where he met Count de Rochambeau. They decided that a detachment from the army, which was fully prepared, would be sent out under Count de Viominil, and that the fleet would go to sea as soon as possible. The wind was favorable for the French and unfavorable for the British. However, the fleet didn't set sail until the evening of the eighth. According to a letter from Monsieur Destouches, this delay was partly due to an incident involving one of his frigates while leaving port, and it's likely that a lack of supplies contributed to it as well. Whatever the reason, Arnold probably owes his escape from the punishment his betrayal deserved to this delay.

Two days after Destouches had sailed, he was followed by Arbuthnot, who overtook him off the capes of Virginia. A partial engagement ensued which continued about an hour, when the fleets were separated.[Pg 361]

Two days after Destouches set sail, Arbuthnot followed him and caught up off the Virginia capes. A brief battle took place that lasted about an hour before the fleets parted ways.[Pg 361]

The French admiral called a council of war the next day, in which it was declared unadviseable to renew the action, and he returned to Newport.

The French admiral called a war council the next day, where it was decided that it wasn't wise to continue the fight, and he returned to Newport.

March 26.

The arrival of two thousand men commanded by General Philips, gave the British a decided superiority in Virginia, and changed the destination of Lafayette, who had been ordered to join the southern army, but to whom the defence of that state was now committed. The troops under his command being taken chiefly from the eastern regiments, had imbibed strong prejudices against a southern climate; and desertions became so frequent as to threaten the dissolution of the corps.

The arrival of two thousand men led by General Philips gave the British a clear advantage in Virginia and changed Lafayette's orders. He was originally supposed to join the southern army, but now he was tasked with defending the state. The troops under his command mainly came from the eastern regiments and had strong biases against the southern climate, resulting in frequent desertions that threatened to break up the unit.

This unpromising state of things was completely changed by a happy expedient adopted by Lafayette. Appealing to the generous principles of his soldiers, principles on which the feelings of his own bosom taught him to rely, he proclaimed in orders, that he was about to enter on an enterprise of great danger and difficulty, in which he persuaded himself his soldiers would not abandon him. If, however, any individual of the detachment was unwilling to accompany him, a permit to return should most assuredly be granted him.

This bleak situation was completely transformed by a clever strategy employed by Lafayette. Tapping into the noble ideals of his soldiers—principles that he believed in strongly—he announced in orders that he was about to undertake a mission full of danger and challenges, convinced that his soldiers would stand by him. However, if any member of the group was hesitant to join him, they would certainly be granted permission to turn back.

This measure had the desired effect, and put an end to desertion.[72] To keep up the good dis[Pg 362]positions of the moment, this ardent young nobleman, who was as unmindful of fortune as he was ambitious of fame, borrowed from the merchants of Baltimore, on his private credit, a sum of money sufficient to purchase shoes, linen, spirits, and other articles of immediate necessity for the detachment.[73]

This action had the intended result and stopped desertion.[72] To maintain the positive momentum, this passionate young nobleman, who cared little for wealth but was eager for glory, borrowed money from the merchants of Baltimore, using his personal credit, to buy shoes, clothing, alcohol, and other essential items for the unit.[73]

Having made these preparations for the campaign, he marched with the utmost celerity to the defence of Virginia. That state was in great need of assistance. The enemy had penetrated deep into its bosom, and was committing those excesses on its inhabitants to which a country unable to repel invasion must always be exposed.

Having made these preparations for the campaign, he marched quickly to defend Virginia. That state was in urgent need of help. The enemy had moved deep into its territory and was inflicting the kinds of harm on its people that any country unable to resist invasion always faces.

General Philips, on his arrival, took command of all the British troops in Virginia; and, after completing the fortification of Portsmouth, commenced offensive operations.

General Philips, upon his arrival, took charge of all the British troops in Virginia. After finishing the fortification of Portsmouth, he started offensive operations.

About two thousand five hundred men were embarked on board some small vessels, and landed at various places in the neighbourhood of Williamsburg. April 24.Different detachments spread themselves over the lower part of that neck of land which is made by York and James Rivers; and, after destroying, without opposition, a ship yard belonging to the state, with some armed vessels and public stores, re-embarked and pro[Pg 363]ceeded to City Point, where they landed in the afternoon of the 24th. The next day they marched against Petersburg, at which place, immense quantities of tobacco and other stores were deposited.

About two thousand five hundred men were loaded onto some small ships and landed at various spots near Williamsburg. April 24th. Different groups spread out over the lower part of the land between the York and James Rivers; and, after destroying a state shipyard, a few armed vessels, and public supplies without facing any opposition, they got back on their ships and proceeded to City Point, where they landed in the afternoon of the 24th. The next day they March toward Petersburg, which was storing massive amounts of tobacco and other supplies.

Baron Steuben was not in a situation to check their progress. The levies of Virginia had marched to the aid of General Greene; and the whole number of militia, at that time in the field, did not much exceed two thousand men. Unwilling to abandon so important a place as Petersburg without the semblance of fighting, the baron posted about one thousand men a mile below the town with orders to skirmish with the enemy. The British troops, without being able to bring him to a close engagement, were two or three hours employed in driving him across the Appomattox, the bridge over which being taken up as soon as the militia had passed it, farther pursuit became impracticable.

Baron Steuben wasn't in a position to stop their advance. The Virginia troops had marched to support General Greene, and the total number of militia in the field at that time was just under two thousand men. Reluctant to leave such an important place as Petersburg without any fight, the Baron stationed about one thousand men a mile south of the town, instructing them to skirmish with the enemy. The British troops, unable to force a full engagement, spent two to three hours pushing him across the Appomattox. Once the militia crossed the bridge, which was taken up immediately, further pursuit became impossible.

This skirmish having terminated with scarcely any loss on either side, the baron retreated towards Richmond, and Philips took quiet possession of Petersburg; where he destroyed a considerable quantity of tobacco, and all the vessels lying in the river.

This skirmish ended with almost no losses on either side, the baron retreated toward Richmond, and Philips took control of Petersburg, where he destroyed a significant amount of tobacco and all the ships in the river.

This service being accomplished, Arnold was detached through Osbornes to Warwick, between which place and Richmond, a respectable naval force, consisting of small armed vessels, had been collected with the intention of co-operating with[Pg 364] the French fleet against Portsmouth; and a few militia were stationed on the northern bank of the river to assist in defending the flotilla.

This service completed, Arnold was sent via Osbornes to Warwick, where a respectable naval force of small armed vessels had been gathered between there and Richmond, aiming to work with[Pg 364] the French fleet against Portsmouth; and a few militiamen were stationed on the northern bank of the river to help defend the flotilla.

The crews of the vessels, on receiving a fire from a few field pieces ordered by Arnold to the bank, scuttled them, escaped to the opposite shore, and dispersed with the militia. Philips marched with the residue of the army to Chesterfield court house, the place of rendezvous for the new levies of Virginia, where he destroyed the barracks with a few public stores; after which he joined Arnold in the neighbourhood of Warwick, April 30.and marched without interruption to Manchester, a small town on the southern bank of James River, immediately opposite to Richmond; where, as was the general practice, the warehouses were set on fire, and all the tobacco consumed.

The crews of the ships, upon receiving fire from a few field guns ordered by Arnold to the bank, sank them, crossed to the other shore, and scattered with the militia. Philips marched with the remaining army to Chesterfield courthouse, the meeting point for the new forces of Virginia, where he destroyed the barracks along with some public supplies; after that, he joined Arnold near Warwick, April 30th. and marched without any interruptions to Manchester, a small town on the southern bank of the James River, right across from Richmond; where, as was the usual practice, the warehouses were set ablaze, and all the tobacco was burned.

On the preceding evening, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had made a forced march from Baltimore, arrived with his detachment at Richmond; and that place, in which a great proportion of the military stores of the state were then collected, was saved, for the time, from a visit which was certainly designed.

On the previous evening, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had made a rapid march from Baltimore, arrived with his group at Richmond; and that location, where a significant amount of the state’s military supplies were gathered, was saved, at least for now, from a visit that was definitely intended.

The regular troops composing this detachment were joined by about two thousand militia, and sixty dragoons. Not thinking it adviseable to attempt the passage of the river in the presence of so respectable an army, General Philips retired to Bermuda Hundred, a point[Pg 365] of land in the confluence of the James and Appomatox, at which place he re-embarked his troops, and fell down the river to Hog Island.

The regular soldiers in this detachment were joined by around two thousand militia and sixty dragoons. Not believing it was wise to try to cross the river in front of such a formidable army, General Philips pulled back to Bermuda Hundred, a piece of land at the confluence of the James and Appomattox. There, he reloaded his troops onto boats and moved down the river to Hog Island.

The Marquis fixed his head quarters on the north of Chiccahominy, about eighteen miles from Richmond; where he remained until a letter from Lord Cornwallis called Philips again up James River.

The Marquis set up his headquarters north of Chiccahominy, about eighteen miles from Richmond, where he stayed until a letter from Lord Cornwallis called Philips back up James River.

When that nobleman determined on marching from Wilmington into Virginia, he signified his wish that the British troops in that state, should take their station at Petersburg.

When that nobleman decided to march from Wilmington into Virginia, he expressed his desire for the British troops in that state to be stationed at Petersburg.

On receiving this letter, Philips proceeded to comply with the request it contained. As soon as the fleet moved up the river, Lafayette returned to the defence of Richmond. Having, on his arrival, received intelligence that Lord Cornwallis was marching northward, and finding Philips landed at Brandon on the south side of the river, he was persuaded that a junction of the two armies must be intended, and hastened to take possession of Petersburg[74] before Philips could reach that place. In this however he was anticipated by the British general; upon which he recrossed James River, and, encamping a few miles below Richmond, used his utmost exertions to remove the military stores in that town to a place of greater security.

Upon receiving this letter, Philips went ahead and fulfilled the request it made. As soon as the fleet advanced up the river, Lafayette returned to defend Richmond. Upon his arrival, he learned that Lord Cornwallis was heading north, and noticing that Philips had landed at Brandon on the south side of the river, he was convinced that the two armies were planning to join forces. He quickly moved to secure Petersburg[74] before Philips could get there. However, he was outpaced by the British general, so he crossed back over the James River and set up camp a few miles downriver from Richmond, making every effort to move the military supplies in the town to a safer location.

Cornwallis arrives.

In this position his army was permitted to repose itself but a few days. Lord Cornwallis, after passing through North Carolina and the southern parts of Virginia without encountering much opposition, and effecting a junction with Arnold, who had succeeded by the death of Philips to the command of the army in Virginia,[75] found himself at the head of a force which nothing in that state could resist; and determined on a vigorous plan of offensive operations. His immediate object was to bring the Marquis to an action; for which purpose he crossed James River at Westover, where he was joined by a reinforcement from New York, and attempted, by turning the left flank of the American army, to get into its rear. Lafayette was not in a condition to risk an engagement. His objects were the security of the public stores, the preservation of his small army for future services, and a junction with the Pennsylvania line which was on its march southward, under the command of General Wayne. As Lord Cornwallis crossed James River, he retired towards the upper country, inclining his route to the north in order to favour a junction with Wayne.

In this position, his army was allowed to rest for only a few days. Lord Cornwallis, after traveling through North Carolina and the southern parts of Virginia without facing much resistance, and joining forces with Arnold, who took command of the army in Virginia after Philips' death, found himself leading a force that nothing in that state could withstand. He decided on a strong plan for offensive operations. His immediate goal was to engage the Marquis in battle, so he crossed the James River at Westover, where he was joined by reinforcements from New York, and attempted to outflank the American army to attack from the rear. Lafayette wasn't in a position to risk a fight. His goals were to secure the public supplies, preserve his small army for future missions, and unite with the Pennsylvania line that was headed south under General Wayne's command. As Lord Cornwallis crossed the James River, he retreated toward the upper country, steering his route north to enable a junction with Wayne.

The fine horses found in the stables of private gentlemen, gave to the British general an effi[Pg 367]cient cavalry; and enabled him to mount so many infantry, as to move large detachments with unusual rapidity. With these advantages, he was so confident of overtaking and destroying his enemy, as to say exultingly in a letter which was intercepted, "the boy can not escape me." His sanguine hopes, however, were disappointed. Lafayette moved with so much celerity and caution as to convince Cornwallis of the impracticability of overtaking him, or of preventing his junction with Wayne.

The fine horses in the stables of wealthy gentlemen provided the British general with an efficient cavalry and allowed him to equip many infantry soldiers, enabling him to move large groups with unusual speed. With these advantages, he was so sure of catching and defeating his enemy that he said confidently in an intercepted letter, "the boy cannot escape me." However, his optimistic hopes were dashed. Lafayette moved with such quickness and caution that he convinced Cornwallis it was impossible to catch him or stop him from joining Wayne.

After marching some distance up the northern side of Northanora, his lordship relinquished the pursuit, and turned his attention to other objects which were more attainable.

After walking for a while up the northern side of Northanora, his lordship gave up the chase and focused on other goals that were more achievable.

Military stores had been collected in various parts of the middle country, and, among others, at the Point of Fork, a point of land made by the confluence of the Rivanna and Fluvanna, the two branches of James' River. Colonel Simcoe was detached with five hundred men against this post, which was protected by between five and six hundred new levies, and a few militia. Tarlton, with two hundred and fifty cavalry and mounted infantry, was ordered at the same time against Charlottesville, where the general assembly was in session. So rapid were his movements that a mere accident prevented his entering the town before any notice of his approach was given. A private gentleman, Mr. Jouiette, who was acquainted with a nearer route than the[Pg 368] great road, hastened to Charlottesville on a fleet horse with the interesting intelligence, and entered the town about two hours before the British cavalry. Nearly all[76] the members of the legislature made their escape, and reassembled at Staunton, on the western side of the Blue Ridge. Tarlton, after destroying the stores at Charlottesville, proceeded down the Rivanna to the Point of Fork.

Military supplies had been gathered in various parts of the central region, including a location called the Point of Fork, where the Rivanna and Fluvanna Rivers merge, forming two branches of James River. Colonel Simcoe was assigned with five hundred men to this site, which was defended by around five to six hundred new recruits and a few militia members. At the same time, Tarleton, with two hundred and fifty cavalry and mounted infantry, was ordered to Charlottesville, where the general assembly was meeting. His swift movements almost allowed him to enter the town before anyone was alerted to his approach. A private citizen, Mr. Jouiette, who knew a shortcut better than the main road, rode quickly to Charlottesville on a fast horse with the important news, arriving about two hours before the British cavalry. Almost all the members of the legislature managed to escape and regrouped in Staunton, on the western side of the Blue Ridge. After destroying the supplies in Charlottesville, Tarleton moved down the Rivanna to the Point of Fork.

The detachment commanded by Simcoe, being composed chiefly of infantry, could not move with equal celerity. That officer, however, conducted his march with so much secrecy and address, that Steuben seems to have been either unapprized of his approach, or to have had no accurate information of his numbers. Intelligence of the expedition to Charlottesville had reached him, and he had prudently employed himself in removing his stores from the Point of Fork to the south side of the Fluvanna.

The unit led by Simcoe, mostly made up of infantry, wasn't able to move as quickly. However, he managed his march with such secrecy and skill that Steuben either wasn't aware of his approach or didn't have accurate information about how many men he had. Steuben had received news about the expedition to Charlottesville and wisely focused on relocating his supplies from the Point of Fork to the south side of the Fluvanna.

The river was at the time unfordable; and the boats were all secured on the southern bank. Yet Steuben, suspecting the detachment of Simcoe to be the van of the British army, or apprehending that Tarlton might get into his rear, withdrew precipitately in the night, and marched near thirty miles, leaving behind him such stores as could not be removed. These were destroyed next morning by a small detach[Pg 369]ment of men who crossed the river in a few canoes.

The river was uncrossable at that time, and all the boats were secured on the southern bank. However, Steuben, fearing that Simcoe's detachment was the front of the British army or worried that Tarlton might attack from behind, quickly retreated overnight and marched nearly thirty miles, leaving behind supplies that couldn’t be moved. The next morning, a small group of men crossed the river in a few canoes and destroyed those supplies.

Presses Lafayette over the Rapidan.

To secure his junction with Wayne, and to keep open his communication towards the north, Lafayette had crossed the Rapidan.

To connect with Wayne and maintain his communication to the north, Lafayette had crossed the Rapidan.

Lafayette forms a junction with Wayne.

These movements of the two armies had thrown Lord Cornwallis between Lafayette and the military stores which had been transported from Richmond up James' River, and deposited at different places, but principally at Albemarle old court house, high up that river. To this place Lord Cornwallis directed his march.

These movements of the two armies had trapped Lord Cornwallis between Lafayette and the military supplies that had been shipped from Richmond up the James River and stored at various locations, mainly at the old Albemarle courthouse, further up the river. Lord Cornwallis set his course for this location.

The Marquis, having effected a junction with the Pennsylvania line consisting of eight hundred men, recrossed the Rapidan, and advanced with so much celerity towards the British army, that he encamped within a few miles of it, while upwards of a day's march from its point of destination.

The Marquis, after joining forces with the Pennsylvania line of eight hundred men, crossed back over the Rapidan and quickly moved toward the British army, setting up camp just a few miles away from it while still over a day's march from their destination.

Confident that the object of the American general must be to protect the magazines on the Fluvanna, Lord Cornwallis encamped at Elk Island, and advanced his light troops to a position commanding the road, by which it was supposed the Americans must pass.

Confident that the American general's goal was to protect the supplies on the Fluvanna, Lord Cornwallis camped at Elk Island and moved his light troops to a position overlooking the road that the Americans were expected to take.

Lafayette, however, discovered in the night a nearer road which had long been disused; and the next morning the British general had the mortification to perceive that the American army had crossed the Rivanna, and taken a strong[Pg 370] position behind the Mechunk creek, which, in a great measure, commanded the route leading from the camp of his lordship to Albemarle old court house. At this place a considerable reinforcement of mountain militia was received.

Lafayette, however, found a shortcut during the night that had been unused for a while; and the next morning, the British general was frustrated to see that the American army had crossed the Rivanna and established a strong[Pg 370] position behind the Mechunk creek, which largely controlled the road leading from his lordship's camp to the Albemarle old court house. At this location, a significant reinforcement of mountain militia arrived.

Cornwallis retires to the lower country.

Apprehending the force opposed to him to be greater than it was in reality, and probably desirous of transferring the war to the lower country, Lord Cornwallis abandoned the objects he had pursued, and retired first to Richmond, and afterwards to Williamsburg.

Recognizing that the enemy force was larger than it actually was, and likely wanting to shift the battle to the lowlands, Lord Cornwallis gave up on his goals and initially withdrew to Richmond, then to Williamsburg.

June 18.

The Marquis followed with cautious circumspection. On the 18th of June, he was reinforced by four or five hundred new levies under the Baron Steuben, which augmented his army to four thousand men, of whom two thousand were regulars. That of Lord Cornwallis was, probably, rather more numerous.

The Marquis followed with careful attention. On June 18th, he was joined by four or five hundred new recruits led by Baron Steuben, bringing his army up to four thousand men, of which two thousand were regulars. Lord Cornwallis's forces were likely somewhat larger.

As the British army retreated to Williamsburg, Lafayette, who sought a partial, though he avoided a general engagement, pressed its rear with his light parties. Colonel Simcoe, who covered the retreat, was overtaken by Colonel Butler about six miles from Williamsburg, and a sharp action ensued. The Americans claimed the advantage; but were compelled to retire by the approach of the whole British army.

As the British army pulled back to Williamsburg, Lafayette, wanting to harass the enemy without starting a full battle, pushed their rear with his smaller groups. Colonel Simcoe, who was covering the retreat, was caught up by Colonel Butler about six miles from Williamsburg, and a fierce clash broke out. The Americans believed they were winning, but they had to fall back due to the arrival of the entire British army.

In the bold and rapid course taken by Lord Cornwallis through the lower and central parts of Virginia, much private as well as public prop[Pg 371]erty[77] was destroyed; and the resources of the state were considerably diminished; but no solid advantage was obtained. Although, from various causes, especially from a want of arms, and from that general repugnance which a harassed, unpaid militia, will universally manifest to military service, less resistance was encountered than was to be expected from the strength and population of the state; no disposition was openly manifested to join the royal standard, or to withdraw from the contest. The Marquis complained of "much slowness, and much carelessness in the country; but the dispositions of the people," he said, "were good, and they required only to be awakened." This,[Pg 372] he thought, would be best effected by the presence of General Washington, an event for which he expressed the most anxious solicitude. But Washington deemed it of more importance to remain on the Hudson, for the purpose of digesting and conducting a grand plan of combined operations then meditated against New York, by the execution of which he counted more certainly on relieving the southern states, than by any other measure it was in his power to adopt.

In the bold and swift advances made by Lord Cornwallis through the lower and central regions of Virginia, a lot of private and public property was destroyed, and the state's resources were significantly reduced; however, no substantial advantage was gained. Due to various reasons, particularly a lack of weapons and the general resistance shown by a beleaguered, unpaid militia to military service, there was less opposition than expected given the state's strength and population. There was no clear intention to support the royal cause or to back away from the fight. The Marquis noted "much slowness and carelessness in the countryside; but the people's sentiments," he said, "were positive, and they just needed to be motivated." He believed that this would be best achieved by having General Washington present, an event he was very eager for. However, Washington thought it was more important to stay on the Hudson to plan and lead a major coordinated strategy against New York, believing that this would more reliably free the southern states than any other course of action he could take.

General Washington's letters are intercepted.

An express carrying letters, communicating to congress the result of his consultations on this subject, with the commanders of the land and naval forces of France, was intercepted in Jersey. The interesting disclosure made by these letters, alarmed Sir Henry Clinton for the safety of New York, and determined him to require the return of a part of the troops in Virginia. Supposing himself too weak, after complying with this requisition, to remain at Williamsburg, Lord Cornwallis took the resolution of retiring to Portsmouth.

An express carrying letters that informed Congress about the outcome of his discussions on this matter with the commanders of the land and naval forces of France was intercepted in Jersey. The important information revealed in these letters alarmed Sir Henry Clinton about the safety of New York and led him to request the return of some troops from Virginia. Feeling too weak to stay in Williamsburg after complying with this request, Lord Cornwallis decided to withdraw to Portsmouth.

In pursuance of this resolution, he marched from Williamsburg and encamped in such a manner as to cover the ford into the island of Jamestown. On the same evening, the Queen's rangers crossed over into the island; and the two succeeding days were employed in passing over the baggage.

In line with this decision, he marched from Williamsburg and set up camp to guard the crossing into the island of Jamestown. That same evening, the Queen's rangers crossed over to the island, and the next two days were spent transporting the luggage.

The morning after the evacuation of Williamsburg, Lafayette changed his position, and[Pg 373] pushed his best troops within nine miles of the British camp, with the intention of attempting their rear, when the main body should have passed into Jamestown.

The morning after evacuating Williamsburg, Lafayette shifted his position and[Pg 373] moved his best troops within nine miles of the British camp, planning to attack their rear once the main force had moved into Jamestown.

Suspecting his design, Lord Cornwallis encamped the greater part of his army on the main land as compactly as possible, and displayed a few troops on the island in such a manner as, in appearance, to magnify their numbers. All the intelligence received by Lafayette concurred in the representation that the greater part of the British army had passed over to the island in the night. July 6.Believing this to be the fact, he detached some riflemen to harass their out-posts, while he advanced at the head of the continental troops in order to cut off the rear.

Suspecting his plan, Lord Cornwallis set up most of his army on the mainland as densely as possible and positioned a few troops on the island in a way that made their numbers seem larger. All the information Lafayette received agreed that most of the British army had moved over to the island during the night. July 6th. Believing this to be true, he sent some riflemen to disrupt their outposts while he led the Continental troops to cut off their rear.

Every appearance was calculated to countenance the opinion he had formed. The British light parties were drawn in, and the piquets were forced by the riflemen without much resistance, but an advanced post which covered the encampment from the view of the Americans, was perseveringly maintained, though three of the officers commanding it were successively picked off by the riflemen. Lafayette, who arrived a little before sunset, suspected from the obstinacy with which this post was maintained, that it covered more than a rear guard, and determined to reconnoitre the camp, and judge of its strength from his own observation.[78] It was[Pg 374] in a great measure concealed by woods; but from a tongue of land stretching into the river, he perceived the British force to be much more considerable than had been supposed, and hastened to call off his men.

Every appearance was designed to support the opinion he had developed. The British light units were drawn in, and the pickets were pushed back by the riflemen without much resistance, but an advanced post that shielded the camp from the Americans' view was stubbornly held, even though three of the officers in charge were shot by the riflemen one after another. Lafayette, who arrived shortly before sunset, suspected that the stubbornness with which this post was held indicated that it was protecting more than just a rear guard, and decided to scout the camp to assess its strength based on his own observations.[78] It was[Pg 374] largely hidden by woods; but from a stretch of land jutting into the river, he saw that the British force was much larger than previously thought and quickly moved to call back his men.

Action near Jamestown.

He found Wayne closely engaged. A piece of artillery had been left weakly defended, which Wayne determined to seize. Scarcely was the attempt made, when he discovered the whole British army, arranged in order for battle, moving out against him. To retreat was impossible, and the boldest had become the safest measure. Under this impression he advanced rapidly, and, with his small detachment, not exceeding eight hundred men, made a gallant charge on the British line. A warm action ensued, which was kept up with great spirit until the arrival of Lafayette, who, perceiving Wayne to be out-flanked both on the right and left, ordered him to retreat and form in a line with the light infantry, who were drawn up about half a mile in his rear. The whole party then saved itself behind a morass.

He found Wayne deeply engaged. A piece of artillery had been left poorly defended, which Wayne decided to take. As soon as he attempted this, he noticed the entire British army, lined up for battle, moving towards him. Retreat was impossible, and the boldest action became the safest option. With this in mind, he quickly moved forward and, with his small group of no more than eight hundred men, charged bravely at the British line. A fierce battle ensued, filled with great energy, until Lafayette arrived. Seeing that Wayne was outflanked on both sides, Lafayette ordered him to retreat and line up with the light infantry, which were positioned about half a mile behind him. The entire group then sheltered itself behind a marsh.

Fortunately for Lafayette, Lord Cornwallis did not improve the advantage he had gained. Suspecting this to be a stratagem of the American general to draw him into an ambuscade, a suspicion equally favoured by the hardiness and time of the attack, Lord Cornwallis, who supposed his enemy to be stronger than he was in reality, would allow no pursuit; and, in the[Pg 375] course of the night, crossed over into the island, whence he, soon afterwards, proceeded to Portsmouth.

Fortunately for Lafayette, Lord Cornwallis didn't take advantage of the lead he had gained. Suspecting this to be a trick by the American general to lure him into a trap, a suspicion made stronger by the boldness and timing of the attack, Lord Cornwallis, believing his enemy to be stronger than they actually were, decided against any pursuit. During the[Pg 375] night, he crossed over to the island and soon after moved on to Portsmouth.

In this action, the Americans lost one hundred and eighteen men, among whom were ten officers; and two pieces of artillery were left on the field, the horses attached to them being killed. The British loss was less considerable.

In this action, the Americans lost one hundred and eighteen men, including ten officers; and two pieces of artillery were left on the field, the horses attached to them having been killed. The British loss was less significant.

All active operations were now suspended; and the harassed army of Lafayette was allowed some repose.

All active operations were now put on hold, and Lafayette's exhausted army was given some rest.

Although no brilliant service was performed by that young nobleman, the campaign in Virginia enhanced his military reputation, and raised him in the general esteem. That with so decided an inferiority of effective force, and especially of cavalry, he had been able to keep the field in an open country, and to preserve a considerable proportion of his military stores, as well as his army, was believed to furnish unequivocal evidence of the prudence and vigour of his conduct.

Although that young nobleman didn’t accomplish anything remarkable, the campaign in Virginia boosted his military reputation and improved how people viewed him overall. It was widely believed that despite having significantly fewer resources, especially in cavalry, he managed to maintain his position in open territory while also safeguarding a substantial amount of his military supplies, as well as his army. This was seen as clear proof of his wise and energetic leadership.


CHAPTER XI.

Farther state of affairs in the beginning of the year 1781.... Measures of Mr. Morris, the superintendent of finances.... Designs of General Washington against New York.... Count Rochambeau marches to the North River.... Intelligence from the Count de Grasse.... Plan of operations against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval engagement.... The combined armies march for the Chesapeake.... Yorktown invested.... Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.

Further developments at the beginning of the year 1781.... Actions taken by Mr. Morris, the head of finances.... General Washington's strategies against New York.... Count Rochambeau moves to the North River.... Updates from Count de Grasse.... Operation plans against Lord Cornwallis.... Naval battle.... The combined armies head for the Chesapeake.... Yorktown surrounded.... Lord Cornwallis surrenders.

 

1781

The deep gloom which had enveloped the prospects of America in the commencement of the year, which darkened for a time in the south, had also spread itself over the north. The total incompetency of the political system adopted by the United States to their own preservation, became every day more apparent. State of affairs at the beginning of the year 1781.Each state seemed fearful of doing too much, and of taking upon itself a larger portion of the common burden than was borne by its neighbour.

The deep gloom that had overshadowed America's prospects at the beginning of the year, which momentarily lifted in the south, had also spread to the north. The complete failure of the political system that the United States adopted for its own survival became more obvious every day. Overview of the situation at the start of the year 1781. Each state seemed afraid of overstepping and taking on a bigger share of the common burden than its neighbor.

The resolutions of congress had called for an army of thirty-seven thousand men, to be in camp by the first of January. Had this requisition been made in time, it is not probable that so large a force could have been brought into the field; but it was made late, and then the difficulties and delays on the part of the several states, exceeded every reasonable calculation. The regular force drawn from Pennsylvania to[Pg 377] Georgia inclusive, at no time, during this active and interesting campaign, amounted to three thousand effective men; and the states from New Hampshire to New Jersey inclusive, so late as the month of April, had furnished only five thousand infantry. Of these, the returns for that month exhibit, in the northern department, less than three thousand effectives. The cavalry and artillery, at no time, amounted to one thousand men. This small army was gradually and slowly augmented so as, in the month of May, to exhibit a total of near seven thousand men, of whom rather more than four thousand might have been relied on for action.

The resolutions of Congress called for an army of thirty-seven thousand men to be in camp by January 1st. If this request had been made in time, it’s unlikely such a large force could have been assembled; however, it was made late, and the challenges and delays from the various states exceeded all reasonable expectations. The regular force brought from Pennsylvania to[Pg 377] Georgia, at no point during this active and significant campaign, amounted to three thousand effective men. The states from New Hampshire to New Jersey, as late as April, had only provided five thousand infantry. Of these, the reports for that month showed less than three thousand effective troops in the northern department. The cavalry and artillery never totaled a thousand men. This small army was gradually and slowly built up, so by May, it reached nearly seven thousand men, of whom just over four thousand could be counted on for action.

The prospects for the campaign were rendered still more unpromising by the failure of supplies for the support of the troops. The long expected clothing from Europe had not arrived; and the want of provisions[79] furnished a still more serious cause of alarm.

The chances for the campaign became even less hopeful due to the lack of supplies to support the troops. The much-anticipated clothing from Europe hadn’t arrived, and the shortage of provisions[79] created an even bigger cause for concern.

After congress had come to the resolution of emitting no more bills on the credit of the continent, the duty of supplying the army with provisions necessarily devolved on the states, who were required to furnish certain specified articles for the subsistence of the troops, according to a ratio established by the federal government. These requisitions had been neglected to such a degree as to excite fears that the soldiers must be disbanded from the want of food.[Pg 378]

After Congress decided to stop issuing more bills backed by the continent's credit, the responsibility of supplying the army with provisions shifted to the states. They were expected to provide specific items for the troops' sustenance, according to a ratio set by the federal government. These requests had been ignored to such an extent that there were fears the soldiers might have to be disbanded due to lack of food.[Pg 378]

To increase the general embarrassment, the quartermaster department was destitute of funds, and unable to transport provisions or other stores from place to place, but by means of impressment supported by a military force. This measure had been repeated, especially in New York, until it excited so much disgust and irritation among the people, that the Commander-in-chief was under serious apprehensions of actual resistance to his authority.

To add to the overall embarrassment, the quartermaster department lacked funds and couldn’t move supplies or other goods from one location to another except by using forceful impressment backed by military power. This tactic had been used repeatedly, especially in New York, until it generated a lot of disgust and anger among the people, causing the Commander-in-chief to seriously worry about real resistance to his authority.

While in this state of deplorable imbecility, intelligence from every quarter announced increasing dangers.

While in this state of terrible foolishness, information from all sides reported growing threats.

Information was received that an expedition was preparing in Canada against Fort Pitt, to be conducted by Sir John Johnston, and Colonel Conelly; and it was understood that many, in the country threatened with invasion, were ready to join the British standard. The Indians too had entered into formidable combinations, endangering the whole extent of the western frontier.

Information was received that an expedition was being prepared in Canada against Fort Pitt, led by Sir John Johnston and Colonel Conelly; it was understood that many people in the area at risk of invasion were ready to join the British cause. The Native Americans had also formed powerful alliances, putting the entire western frontier at risk.

In addition to these alarming circumstances, some vessels had arrived at Crown Point from Canada, with information that three thousand men had been assembled on the lakes, for the purpose of attempting, once more, an invasion from that quarter.

In addition to these alarming circumstances, some ships had arrived at Crown Point from Canada with news that three thousand men had gathered on the lakes, intending to attempt another invasion from that direction.

This information, though unfounded, was believed to be true, and was, at that critical moment, the more alarming, because a corre[Pg 379]spondence of a criminal nature had just been discovered between some persons in Albany and in Canada. A letter intercepted by Generals Schuyler and Clinton, stated the disaffection of particular settlements, the provision made in those settlements for the subsistence of an invading army, and their readiness to join such army.

This information, although baseless, was taken as true, and at that crucial moment, it was even more alarming because a link of a criminal nature had just been uncovered between some individuals in Albany and Canada. A letter intercepted by Generals Schuyler and Clinton mentioned the discontent of certain settlements, the preparations made in those settlements for supporting an invading army, and their willingness to join that army.

This intelligence from the northern frontier derived increased interest from the ambiguous conduct observed by the inhabitants of that tract of country which now constitutes the state of Vermont. They had settled lands within the chartered limits of New York, under grants from the governor of New Hampshire; and had, early in the war, declared themselves independent, and exercised the powers of self-government. The state of New York, however, still continuing to assert her claim of sovereignty, the controversy on this delicate subject had become so violent as to justify the apprehension that, in the opinion of the people of Vermont, the restoration of British authority was an evil not of greater magnitude, than the establishment of that of New York. The declaration was openly made that, if not admitted into the union as an independent state, they held themselves at liberty to make a separate peace; and some negotiations had been commenced, which were believed to manifest a dis[Pg 380]position in Vermont, to abandon the common cause of America.

This information from the northern frontier gained more attention due to the unclear behavior of the people living in what is now Vermont. They had settled on land that was within the recognized boundaries of New York, having received grants from the governor of New Hampshire, and had declared their independence early in the war while exercising self-governance. However, New York continued to assert its claim of authority, leading to such a fierce debate on this sensitive issue that many in Vermont felt that British rule was not a greater threat than New York’s control. It was openly stated that if they were not allowed into the union as an independent state, they felt free to pursue a separate peace, and some discussions had begun that suggested a willingness in Vermont to abandon the shared cause of America.

Accustomed to contemplate all public events which might grow out of the situation of the United States, and to prepare for them while at a distance, the American chief was not depressed by this state of American affairs. With a mind happily tempered by nature, and improved by experience, those fortunate events which had occasionally brightened the prospects of his country, never relaxed his exertions, or lessened his precautions; nor could the most disastrous state of things drive him to despair. Although entirely uncertain what operation he might be enabled to undertake during the approaching campaign, he had adopted such preparatory steps as might enable him to turn to advantage any fortunate incident which might occur. In consequence of conferences previously held with the Count de Rochambeau, for the purpose of digesting a system adapted to contingent events, orders were transmitted to that officer, directing him to be in readiness to march as large a body of the French troops to the North River, as could be spared from the protection of the fleet.

Used to thinking about all the public events that could arise from the situation in the United States and preparing for them from afar, the American leader was not discouraged by the current state of affairs. With a mind well-balanced by nature and sharpened by experience, the moments of good fortune that had occasionally brightened his country's outlook did not lessen his efforts or reduce his caution; nor could the worst circumstances push him into despair. Although he had no clear idea of what actions he might take in the upcoming campaign, he had taken the necessary preparatory measures to capitalize on any fortunate incident that might happen. As a result of earlier discussions with Count de Rochambeau to formulate a plan tailored to unexpected events, orders were sent to that officer instructing him to prepare to move as many French troops as possible to the North River, as long as it didn’t compromise the protection of the fleet.

Early in May, the Count de Barras, who had been appointed to the command of the French fleet stationed on the American coast, arrived in Boston accompanied by the Viscount de Rochambeau, and brought the long expected in[Pg 381]formation from the cabinet of Versailles, respecting the naval armament designed to act in the American seas. Twenty ships of the line, to be commanded by the Count de Grasse, were destined for the West Indies, twelve of which were to proceed to the continent of America, and might be expected to arrive in the month of July.

Early in May, Count de Barras, who had been put in charge of the French fleet stationed on the American coast, arrived in Boston with Viscount de Rochambeau. He brought the long-awaited information from Versailles about the naval forces planned to operate in American waters. Twenty ships of the line, commanded by Count de Grasse, were destined for the West Indies, with twelve of them set to head to the continental United States, expected to arrive in July.

Designs of General Washington against New York.

An interview between General Washington and the Count de Rochambeau immediately took place at Weathersfield, in which it was determined to unite the troops of France to those of America on the Hudson, and to proceed against New York. The regular army at that station was estimated at four thousand five hundred men,[80] and though it was understood that Sir Henry Clinton would be able to reinforce it with five or six thousand militia, it was believed that the post could not be maintained without recalling a considerable part of the troops from the south; in which event, the allied army might be employed advantageously in that part of the union.

An interview between General Washington and Count de Rochambeau quickly took place in Weathersfield, where they decided to combine the French and American troops on the Hudson River and advance towards New York. The regular army stationed there was estimated at four thousand five hundred men,[80] and while it was understood that Sir Henry Clinton could reinforce it with five or six thousand militia, it was thought that the position couldn't be held without pulling back a significant number of troops from the South; if that happened, the allied army could be better utilized in that part of the country.

The prospect of expelling the British from New York roused the northern states from that apathy into which they appeared to be sinking, and vigorous measures were taken to fill their regiments. Yet those measures were not completely successful. In the month of June, when[Pg 382] the army took the field, and encamped at Peekskill, its effective numbers did not exceed five thousand men.

The idea of driving the British out of New York energized the northern states, pulling them out of the seemingly deep complacency they were in, and strong efforts were made to recruit for their regiments. However, those efforts weren't fully successful. In June, when[Pg 382] the army went into action and set up camp at Peekskill, it had less than five thousand soldiers available.

Such was the American force in the north, with which the campaign of 1781 was opened. It fell so far short of that on which the calculations had been made at Weathersfield, as to excite serious doubts respecting the propriety of adhering to the plan there concerted, although some compensation was made for this deficiency on the part of the states by the arrival of a reinforcement of fifteen hundred men to the army of Rochambeau under convoy of a fifty gun frigate.

Such was the American force in the north, with which the campaign of 1781 was opened. It fell so far short of what had been planned at Weathersfield, raising serious doubts about whether it was wise to stick to the plan that had been agreed upon there, although some compensation for this shortfall came from the arrival of a reinforcement of fifteen hundred men to Rochambeau's army, escorted by a fifty-gun frigate.

To supply even this army with provisions, required much greater exertions than had ever been made since the system of requisitions had been substituted for that of purchasing. The hope of terminating the war produced these exertions. The legislatures of the New England states took up the subject in earnest, and passed resolutions for raising the necessary supplies. But until these resolutions could be executed, the embarrassments of the army continued; and, for some time after the troops had taken the field, there was reason to apprehend, either that the great objects of the campaign must be relinquished for want of provisions, or that coercive means must still be used.

To provide even this army with supplies required much more effort than had ever been made since the system of requisitions replaced purchasing. The hope of ending the war motivated these efforts. The legislatures of the New England states took the issue seriously and passed resolutions to raise the necessary supplies. But until these resolutions could be carried out, the army's challenges continued; and for some time after the troops were deployed, there were concerns that either the main goals of the campaign would have to be abandoned due to lack of supplies, or that forceful measures would still need to be used.

New England not furnishing flour, this important article was to be drawn from New York,[Pg 383] New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The two first states were much exhausted; and the application to Pennsylvania did not promise to be very successful. On this subject, therefore, serious fears existed.

New England not providing flour, this essential item was to be sourced from New York,[Pg 383] New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The first two states were pretty drained; and the request to Pennsylvania didn’t seem very promising. Therefore, there were serious concerns about this situation.

These were removed, in a great degree, by the activity and exertions of an individual.

These were largely eliminated by the efforts and hard work of one person.

Superintendent of finances appointed.

The management of the finances had been lately committed to Mr. Robert Morris, a delegate to congress from the state of Pennsylvania. This gentleman united considerable political talents to a degree of mercantile enterprise, information, and credit, seldom equalled in any country. He had accepted this arduous appointment on the condition of being allowed the year 1781 to make his arrangements; during which time, the department was to be conducted by those already employed, with the resources which government could command. But the critical state of public affairs, and the pressing wants of the army, furnished irresistible motives for changing his original determination, and entering immediately on the duties of his office. The occasion required that he should bring his private credit in aid of the public resources, and pledge himself personally and extensively, for articles of absolute necessity which could not be otherwise obtained. Condemning the system of violence and of legal fraud, which had too long been practised, as being calculated to defeat its own object, he sought the gradual[Pg 384] restoration of confidence by the only means which could restore it:—a punctual and faithful compliance with his engagements. Herculean as was this task in the existing derangement of American finances, he entered upon it courageously; and, if not completely successful, certainly did more than could have been supposed possible with the means placed in his hands. It is, in no inconsiderable degree, to be attributed to him, that the very active and decisive operations of the campaign were not impeded, perhaps defeated, by a failure of the means for transporting military stores, and feeding the army.

The management of finances had recently been assigned to Mr. Robert Morris, a delegate to Congress from Pennsylvania. This man combined significant political skills with a level of business acumen, knowledge, and credibility that’s rarely seen anywhere. He had taken on this challenging role with the understanding that he would have the year 1781 to arrange everything; during that time, the department would be run by those already in place, using the resources the government could access. However, the urgent state of public affairs and the army's pressing needs provided strong reasons for him to change his original plan and immediately take on the responsibilities of his position. The situation required him to use his personal credit to support public resources, personally and significantly guaranteeing the acquisition of essential supplies that couldn’t be obtained otherwise. Rejecting the violent and fraudulent practices that had been used for too long—practices that would undermine their own goals—he aimed for the gradual restoration of trust through the only reliable means: consistently and faithfully fulfilling his commitments. Despite the monumental challenge posed by the disorder in American finances, he tackled it bravely; and while he might not have achieved complete success, he certainly accomplished more than anyone could have imagined with the resources available to him. It’s largely thanks to him that the very active and decisive actions of the campaign were not hindered—perhaps even thwarted—by a failure to transport military supplies and feed the army.

On determining to enter on the duties of his office, Mr. Morris laid before congress the plan of a national bank, whose notes were to be receivable from the respective states as specie, into the treasury of the United States. Congress gave its full approbation to this beneficial institution; and passed an ordinance for its incorporation.

On deciding to take on the responsibilities of his office, Mr. Morris presented to Congress the idea of a national bank, whose notes would be accepted by the states as cash in the treasury of the United States. Congress fully approved of this valuable institution and passed a law to incorporate it.

Important as was this measure to the future operations of the army, a contract entered into with the state of Pennsylvania was of still more immediate utility.

Important as this measure was for the army's future operations, a contract made with the state of Pennsylvania was even more useful right away.

After furnishing flour to relieve the wants of the moment on his private credit, Mr. Morris proposed to take on himself the task of complying with all the specific requisitions made on Pennsylvania, and to rely for reimbursement on[Pg 385] the taxes imposed by law, to be collected under his direction. This proposition being accepted, the contract was made; and supplies which the government found itself unable to furnish, were raised by an individual.

After providing flour to meet immediate needs on his personal credit, Mr. Morris offered to handle all the specific requests made on Pennsylvania and planned to rely on[Pg 385] the taxes mandated by law, to be collected under his supervision. Once this proposal was accepted, the contract was established; and supplies that the government couldn't provide were sourced by an individual.

Count Rochambeau marches to the North River.

As the French troops approached the North River, intelligence was received that a large detachment from New York had made an incursion into Jersey, under appearances indicating an intention not to return immediately. This being thought a favourable moment for gaining the posts on the north end of York Island, a plan was formed for seizing them by a coup de main. General Washington fixed on the night of the second of July for making the attempt; it being supposed that the Count de Rochambeau might join the American army at Kingsbridge by that time. An aid-de-camp was therefore despatched to meet that officer with letters explaining the enterprise, and requesting him to meet the Commander-in-chief at the time and place appointed.

As the French troops got closer to the North River, they received word that a large group from New York had invaded New Jersey, suggesting they didn’t plan to return right away. This was seen as a good opportunity to take the posts at the north end of York Island, so a plan was made to capture them quickly. General Washington decided on the night of July 2nd for the attempt, assuming that Count de Rochambeau would join the American army at Kingsbridge by then. An aide was sent to meet that officer with letters detailing the operation and asking him to meet the Commander-in-chief at the designated time and place.

With the proposed attack on these works, an attempt to cut off some light troops stationed on the outside of Kingsbridge at Morrissania, under the command of Colonel Delaney, was to be combined. This part of the plan was to be executed by the Duke de Lauzun, to whose legion Sheldon's dragoons, and a small body of continental troops dispersed on the lines, under[Pg 386] the command of General Waterbury, were to be added.

With the planned attack on these operations, there was an effort to cut off some light troops stationed outside Kingsbridge at Morrissania, under Colonel Delaney's command. This part of the plan was to be carried out by Duke de Lauzun, who would combine Sheldon's dragoons and a small group of Continental troops scattered along the lines, under[Pg 386] General Waterbury's command.

On the part of the Americans, all that could contribute to the success of this enterprise was done. A strong detachment commanded by General Lincoln, which fell down the river in boats with muffled oars, reached its ground undiscovered on the night of the first of July; and the army, conducted by General Washington, marched to Valentine's hill. The next day, Lincoln perceived that the detachment had returned from Jersey, that the British were encamped in great force on the north end of the island, and that a ship of war watched the landing place. These unexpected obstacles having defeated the design upon the works, he proceeded to execute his eventual orders of co-operation with the Duke de Lauzun. These were, after landing above Spiken Devil Creek, to march to the high ground in front of Kingsbridge, and there conceal his detachment, until the attack on Delaney's corps should commence.

On the part of the Americans, everything that could help succeed in this mission was done. A strong group led by General Lincoln, which moved down the river in boats with quiet paddles, reached its destination unnoticed on the night of July 1st; meanwhile, the army, led by General Washington, marched to Valentine's Hill. The next day, Lincoln realized that the detachment had returned from Jersey, that the British were camped in large numbers at the north end of the island, and that a warship was monitoring the landing spot. These unexpected challenges thwarted the plan against the fortifications, so he moved forward to carry out his coordinated orders with the Duke de Lauzun. These orders were to land above Spiken Devil Creek, march to the high ground in front of Kingsbridge, and then hide his group until the attack on Delaney's troops began.

The Duke de Lauzun did not arrive, and the return of day betrayed Lincoln. A British corps advanced upon him; on hearing which, General Washington put his troops in motion, and, on his approach, the British troops retired into the island.

The Duke de Lauzun didn't show up, and the return of day exposed Lincoln. A British force moved toward him; upon hearing this, General Washington got his troops ready, and as he got closer, the British forces retreated to the island.

Both parts of the plan having thus failed, the army retreated to Dobbs' ferry, where it was[Pg 387] joined by the Count de Rochambeau on the sixth of July.

Both parts of the plan having thus failed, the army retreated to Dobbs' Ferry, where it was[Pg 387] joined by Count de Rochambeau on July 6th.

The thanks of the Commander-in-chief were given to that officer in general orders, for the unremitting zeal with which he had proceeded to form his so long wished for junction with the American army; and he was requested to convey to the officers and soldiers under his command, the grateful sense which the general entertained of the cheerfulness with which they had performed so long and laborious a march at so hot a season.

The Commander-in-chief expressed his thanks to that officer in general orders for his relentless dedication in making the long-awaited connection with the American army. He was asked to pass on to the officers and soldiers under his command the general's appreciation for the enthusiasm with which they completed such a long and challenging march in such hot weather.

The utmost exertions were made for the grand enterprise against New York. But as the execution of any plan that could be formed, depended on events which were uncertain, the Commander-in-chief directed his attention to other objects, to be pursued if that which was most desirable should prove unattainable. Should the siege of New York become unadviseable, his views were turned to Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia.

The greatest efforts were put into the major plan against New York. However, since the success of any strategy relied on unpredictable events, the Commander-in-chief shifted his focus to other goals, to be pursued if the most desirable one turned out to be unreachable. If the siege of New York became unwise, his attention moved to Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia.

Early in August, the apprehension that he should be unable to accomplish his favourite object, began to influence his conduct. Letters from the Marquis de Lafayette announced that a large portion of the troops in Virginia were embarked, and that their destination was believed to be New York. Intelligence from the Count de Grasse.This intelligence induced him to turn his attention more seriously to the south; but, to conceal from Sir Henry[Pg 388] Clinton this eventual change of plan, his arrangements were made secretly, and the preparations for acting against New York were continued. A reinforcement from Europe of near three thousand men, induced Sir Henry Clinton to countermand the orders he had given to Lord Cornwallis to detach a part of the army in Virginia to his aid; and also to direct that nobleman to take a strong position on the Chesapeake, from which he might execute the designs meditated against the states lying on that bay, so soon as the storm which threatened the British power for the moment, should blow over. In a few days after the arrival of this reinforcement, the Count de Barras gave General Washington the interesting information, that De Grasse was to have sailed from Cape Francis for the Chesapeake, on the third of August, with from twenty-five to twenty-nine ships of the line, having on board three thousand two hundred soldiers; and that he had made engagements with the officers commanding the land and naval forces of Spain in the West Indies, to return to those seas by the middle of October.

Early in August, the worry that he might not achieve his main goal began to affect his behavior. Letters from Marquis de Lafayette reported that a large part of the troops in Virginia were on their way, and their likely destination was New York. Info from Count de Grasse.This news prompted him to focus more seriously on the South; however, to keep Sir Henry[Pg 388] Clinton unaware of this potential change in strategy, he made his plans in secret and continued preparing actions against New York. A reinforcement of nearly three thousand men from Europe led Sir Henry Clinton to cancel his orders to Lord Cornwallis to send part of the army in Virginia to assist him; he also instructed Cornwallis to take a strong position on the Chesapeake, from where he could carry out the plans against the states around the bay, as soon as the immediate threat to British power passed. A few days after this reinforcement arrived, Count de Barras informed General Washington that De Grasse was expected to sail from Cape Francis for the Chesapeake on August 3rd, with twenty-five to twenty-nine ships of the line, carrying three thousand two hundred soldiers; he also had agreements with the commanders of Spanish land and naval forces in the West Indies to return to those waters by mid-October.

This intelligence manifested the necessity of determining immediately, and positively, on the object against which the combined forces should be directed. The shortness of the time appropriated by De Grasse for his continuance on the American coast, the apparent unwillingness of the naval officers to attempt to force a pass[Pg 389]age into the harbour of New York, and the failure of the states to comply with the requisitions which had been made on them for men, decided in favour of operations to the south; and Lafayette was requested to make such a disposition of his army as should be best calculated to prevent Lord Cornwallis from saving himself by a sudden march to Charleston.[81]

This understanding highlighted the urgent need to decide quickly and clearly on the target for the combined forces. The short time De Grasse planned to stay on the American coast, the apparent reluctance of the naval officers to try to force a passage into the New York harbor, and the states' failure to respond to the requests for troops led to the choice for operations in the south. Lafayette was then asked to organize his army in a way that would best prevent Lord Cornwallis from escaping by making a sudden march to Charleston.[Pg 389][81]

Conformably to the intelligence communicated by the Count de Barras, the Count de Grasse arrived in the Chesapeake late in August with twenty-eight ships of the line and several frigates. At Cape Henry he found an officer despatched by Lafayette with full intelligence of the situation of the armies in Virginia. Lord Cornwallis had collected his whole force at Yorktown and Gloucester Point, which he was fortifying assiduously; and the Marquis had taken a position on James River.

According to the information shared by Count de Barras, Count de Grasse arrived in the Chesapeake in late August with twenty-eight battleships and several frigates. At Cape Henry, he met an officer sent by Lafayette who provided detailed information about the armies in Virginia. Lord Cornwallis had gathered his entire force at Yorktown and Gloucester Point, where he was hard at work fortifying. Meanwhile, the Marquis had positioned himself on the James River.

In consequence of this information, four ships of the line and several frigates were detached to block up the mouth of York River, and convey the land forces brought from the West Indies, under the command of the Marquis de St. Simon, up the James to join Lafayette, who, on receiving this reinforcement, took post at[Pg 390] Williamsburg. In the mean time, the fleet lay at anchor just within the capes. On the 25th of August the Count de Barras[82] sailed from Newport for the Chesapeake.

As a result of this information, four ships of the line and several frigates were sent to block the mouth of York River and transport the land forces from the West Indies, under the command of the Marquis de St. Simon, up the James River to join Lafayette. Upon receiving this reinforcement, he took position at[Pg 390] Williamsburg. Meanwhile, the fleet remained anchored just inside the capes. On August 25th, Count de Barras[82] sailed from Newport to the Chesapeake.

Rodney was apprized of the destination of De Grasse, but seems not to have suspected that the whole fleet would sail for the continent of America. Supposing therefore that a part of his squadron would be sufficient to maintain an equality of naval force in the American seas, he detached Sir Samuel Hood to the continent with only fourteen sail of the line. That officer arrived at Sandy Hook on the twenty-eighth of August.

Rodney was informed about De Grasse's destination but didn’t seem to realize that the entire fleet was heading to the continent of America. Assuming that part of his squadron would be enough to keep a balance of naval power in the American waters, he sent Sir Samuel Hood to the continent with just fourteen ships of the line. That officer arrived at Sandy Hook on August 28th.

Admiral Greaves, who had succeeded Arbuthnot in the command of the fleet on the American station, lay in the harbour of New York with seven ships of the line, only five of which were fit for service. On the day that Hood appeared and gave information that De Grasse was probably on the coast, intelligence was also received that De Barras had sailed from Newport.

Admiral Greaves, who took over from Arbuthnot in commanding the fleet on the American station, was docked in New York Harbor with seven ships of the line, but only five were ready for action. On the day Hood arrived and reported that De Grasse was likely on the coast, news also came in that De Barras had set sail from Newport.

The ships fit for sea were ordered out of the harbour; and Greaves, with the whole fleet, consisting of nineteen sail of the line, proceeded in quest of the French.[Pg 391]

The ships ready for the ocean were ordered out of the harbor; and Greaves, with the entire fleet, made up of nineteen battleships, set out in search of the French.[Pg 391]

Not suspecting the strength of De Grasse, he hoped to fall in with one or the other of their squadrons, and to fight it separately.

Not realizing De Grasse's strength, he hoped to encounter one of their squadrons and fight it separately.

Early in the morning of the 5th of September, while the French fleet lay at anchor just within the Chesapeake, the British squadron was descried. Orders were immediately given by De Grasse to form the line, and put to sea. About four in the afternoon, the action commenced between the headmost ships, and continued until sunset. Several ships were much damaged, but neither admiral could claim the victory. For five successive days the hostile fleets continued within view of each other. After which, De Grasse returned to his former station within the capes. At his anchorage ground he found De Barras with the squadron from Newport, and fourteen transports laden with heavy artillery, and military stores proper for carrying on a siege. The British admiral approaching the capes, found the entrance of the Chesapeake defended by a force with which he was unable to contend, and therefore bore away for New York.

Early in the morning on September 5th, while the French fleet was anchored just inside the Chesapeake, the British squadron was spotted. De Grasse immediately gave orders to form the line and head out to sea. Around four in the afternoon, the battle began between the leading ships and continued until sunset. Several ships sustained significant damage, but neither admiral could claim victory. For five straight days, the opposing fleets remained in sight of each other. After that, De Grasse returned to his previous position within the capes. At his anchorage, he found De Barras with the squadron from Newport, along with fourteen transports loaded with heavy artillery and military supplies suitable for a siege. As the British admiral approached the capes, he found the entrance to the Chesapeake defended by a force he couldn't engage with and thus turned back to New York.

Plan of operations against Lord Cornwallis.

General Washington had determined to entrust the defence of the Hudson to General Heath, and to command the southern expedition in person. All the French, and a detachment amounting to upwards of two thousand men from the continental army, were destined for this service. On the 19th of August, Hazen's[Pg 392] regiment and the Jersey line, were directed to pass the Hudson at Dobbs' ferry, and take a position between Springfield and Chatham, where they were to cover some bake-houses to be constructed in the neighbourhood, for the purpose of veiling the real designs of the American chief, and of exciting fears for Staten Island. The combined armies march for the Chesapeake.On the same day, the whole army was put in motion; and on the twenty-fifth the passage of the river was completed.

General Washington decided to assign the defense of the Hudson to General Heath and personally lead the southern expedition. All the French forces, along with a detachment of over two thousand men from the Continental Army, were designated for this mission. On August 19th, Hazen's[Pg 392] regiment and the Jersey line were ordered to cross the Hudson at Dobbs' Ferry and set up a position between Springfield and Chatham, where they would protect some bake-houses to be built nearby. This was meant to conceal the true intentions of the American leader and create concerns about Staten Island. The united armies are marching towards the Chesapeake. On the same day, the entire army was mobilized, and by the twenty-fifth, the river crossing was finished.

To conceal as long as possible the real object of this movement, the march of the army was continued until the thirty-first, in such a direction as to keep up fears for New York; and a considerable degree of address was used to countenance the opinion that the real design was against that place. The letters which had been intercepted by Sir Henry Clinton favoured this deception; and so strong was the impression they made that, even after it became necessary for the combined army to leave the route leading down the Hudson, he is stated to have retained his fears for New York, and not to have suspected the real object of his adversary until he had approached the Delaware;[83] and it had become too late to obstruct the progress of the allied army towards Virginia. He then resolved to make every exertion in his power to[Pg 393] relieve Lord Cornwallis, and in the mean time to act offensively in the north. September 6.An expedition was planned against New London, in Connecticut, and a strong detachment, under the command of General Arnold, was embarked on board a fleet of transports, which landed early in the morning of the 6th of September on both sides the harbour, about three miles from the town.

To keep the true purpose of this movement hidden for as long as possible, the army continued its march until the thirty-first, moving in a direction that would raise concerns about New York. A significant effort was made to support the idea that the real target was that city. The letters intercepted by Sir Henry Clinton supported this deception, creating such a strong impression that even when it became necessary for the combined army to leave the path down the Hudson, he is said to have still feared for New York and not suspected the true aim of his opponents until they got close to the Delaware;[83] and by then it was too late to block the allied army's advance towards Virginia. He then decided to do everything he could to[Pg 393] help Lord Cornwallis, while also planning an offensive in the north. September 6th.An expedition was organized against New London, Connecticut, and a strong detachment led by General Arnold was sent on a fleet of transports, landing early in the morning on September 6 on both sides of the harbor, about three miles from the town.

New London is a seaport town on the west side of the Thames. A fort called fort Trumbull, and a redoubt had been constructed just below it, on the same side of the river; and opposite to it, on Groton hill, was fort Griswold, a strong square fortification, but not fully manned. General Arnold, who commanded in person the troops that landed on the western side of the harbour, advanced immediately against the posts on that side. These being untenable, were evacuated on his approach; and he took possession of them with inconsiderable loss. To prevent the escape of the vessels up the river, Lieutenant Colonel Eyre, who commanded the division which landed on the Groton side of the harbour, had been ordered to storm fort Griswold, which had been represented to Arnold as too incomplete to make any serious resistance. But the place being of some strength, and the approach to it difficult, Colonel Ledyard, who commanded it with a garrison of one hundred and sixty men, determined to defend it. On his[Pg 394] refusing to surrender, the British assaulted it on three sides, and overcoming the difficulties opposed to them, made a lodgement on the ditch and fraized work, and entered the embrasures with charged bayonets. Further resistance being hopeless, the action ceased on the part of the Americans, and Colonel Ledyard delivered his sword to the commanding officer of the assailants. Irritated by the obstinacy of the defence, and the loss sustained in the assault, the British officer on whom the command had devolved, tarnished the glory of victory by the inhuman use he made of it. Instead of respecting, with the generous spirit of a soldier, the gallantry which he had subdued, he indulged the vindictive feelings which had been roused by the slaughter of his troops. In the account given of this affair by Governor Trumbull to General Washington, he says, "The sword presented by Colonel Ledyard was immediately plunged into his bosom, and the carnage was kept up until the greater part of the garrison was killed or wounded."

New London is a port town on the west side of the Thames. A fort called Fort Trumbull and a redoubt were built just below it on the same side of the river; and across from it, on Groton Hill, was Fort Griswold, a strong square fortification but not fully manned. General Arnold, who personally commanded the troops landing on the west side of the harbor, immediately advanced against the positions on that side. These positions were untenable and were evacuated as he approached, allowing him to take possession with minimal loss. To prevent the escape of vessels up the river, Lieutenant Colonel Eyre, who commanded the division that landed on the Groton side of the harbor, was ordered to attack Fort Griswold, which Arnold had been told was too incomplete to pose any serious resistance. However, the fort was quite strong and difficult to approach, so Colonel Ledyard, who commanded a garrison of one hundred and sixty men there, decided to defend it. When he refused to surrender, the British attacked from three sides, overcoming the challenges they faced, and managed to lodge themselves in the ditch and fraized work and enter the embrasures with their bayonets drawn. Realizing further resistance was pointless, the Americans ceased fighting, and Colonel Ledyard surrendered his sword to the British commander. Frustrated by the stubborn defense and the casualties his troops suffered in the assault, the British officer who took command marred the victory with his cruel actions. Instead of honoring the bravery he had conquered, he gave in to the vengeful feelings stirred by the deaths of his men. In his account of the incident to General Washington, Governor Trumbull stated, "The sword presented by Colonel Ledyard was immediately plunged into his bosom, and the carnage continued until most of the garrison was killed or wounded."

In this fierce assault, Colonel Eyre was killed, and Major Montgomery, the second in command, also fell, as he entered the American works. The total loss of the assailants was not much less than two hundred men.

In this intense battle, Colonel Eyre was killed, and Major Montgomery, the second in command, also died as he entered the American fortifications. The total losses for the attackers were nearly two hundred men.

The town of New London, and the stores contained in it, were consumed by fire. To escape the odium which invariably attends the wanton[Pg 395] destruction of private property, this fire was attributed to accident; but all the American accounts unite in declaring it to have been intentional.

The town of New London and the stores within it were destroyed by fire. To avoid the blame that usually comes with the reckless destruction of private property, this fire was labeled as an accident; however, all American reports agree that it was deliberate.

September 6.

The march of General Washington was not arrested by this excursion into New England. Having made the arrangements for the transportation of his army down the Chesapeake, he proceeded in person to Virginia, attended by the Count de Rochambeau, and the Chevalier de Chatelleux; and, on the 14th of September, reached Williamsburg[84] accompanied by Rochambeau, Chatelleux, Knox, and Du Portail, he immediately repaired to the fleet, and a plan of co-operation was adjusted on board the Ville de Paris, conforming to his wish in every respect, except that the Count de Grasse declined complying with a proposition to station some of his[Pg 396] ships in the river above Yorktown, thinking it too hazardous.

The march of General Washington wasn’t stopped by this trip into New England. After arranging for his army to be transported down the Chesapeake, he traveled to Virginia, joined by Count de Rochambeau and Chevalier de Chatelleux. On September 14th, he arrived in Williamsburg[84] and, along with Rochambeau, Chatelleux, Knox, and Du Portail, he went straight to the fleet. They worked out a cooperation plan on board the Ville de Paris, which aligned with his wishes in every way, except that Count de Grasse refused to agree to a proposal to station some of his[Pg 396] ships in the river above Yorktown, considering it too risky.

While the close investment of the British army was delayed, only until the troops from the north should arrive, serious apprehensions were excited that the brilliant results confidently anticipated from the superiority of the land and naval forces of the allies, would be put in imminent hazard.

While the British army's close involvement was postponed, just until the troops from the north arrived, there were serious worries that the exciting outcomes expected from the combined strength of the allies' land and naval forces would be put in serious danger.

Information was received that a reinforcement of six ships of the line under Admiral Digby had reached New York. Confident that the British fleet, thus augmented, would attempt every thing for the relief of Lord Cornwallis, De Grasse expected to be attacked by a force not much inferior to his own. Thinking his station within the Chesapeake unfavourable for a naval combat, he designed to change it, and communicated to General Washington his intention to leave a few frigates to block up the mouths of James and York Rivers, and to put to sea with his fleet in quest of the British. If they should not have left the harbour of New York, he purposed to block them up in that place; supposing that his operations in that quarter would be of more service to the common cause, than his remaining in the bay, an idle spectator of the siege of York.

Information was received that a reinforcement of six ships of the line under Admiral Digby had reached New York. Confident that the British fleet, now strengthened, would do everything possible to relieve Lord Cornwallis, De Grasse expected to be attacked by a force not much smaller than his own. Believing that his position within the Chesapeake was not favorable for a naval battle, he intended to change it and informed General Washington of his plan to leave a few frigates to block the mouths of the James and York Rivers, while he set out to sea with his fleet in search of the British. If they hadn’t left the harbor of New York, he planned to blockade them there, thinking that his efforts in that area would be more beneficial to the common cause than staying in the bay as a passive observer of the siege of York.

The Commander-in-chief was much alarmed at this communication. Should the admiral put to sea, the winds and many accidents might pre[Pg 397]vent his return to the Chesapeake. During his absence, a temporary naval superiority might be acquired by the British in those waters, and the army of Lord Cornwallis might be placed in perfect security. The movement would expose to the caprice of fortune, an object of vast importance, which was now reduced almost to certainty. The admiral was therefore entreated to preserve his station.

The Commander-in-chief was quite concerned about this message. If the admiral set sail, the winds and various unexpected events might keep him from returning to the Chesapeake. During his absence, the British could gain temporary naval superiority in those waters, and Lord Cornwallis's army could be completely secure. This move would put at risk something very important that was almost guaranteed. The admiral was therefore urged to stay in his position.

Fortunately, the wishes of the general prevailed, and the admiral consented to relinquish those plans of active enterprise which his thirst for military glory had suggested, and to maintain a station which the American general deemed so conducive to the interests of the allies.

Fortunately, the general's wishes won out, and the admiral agreed to abandon his ambitious plans for military glory and instead keep a position that the American general considered essential for the allies' interests.

September 25.

On the 25th of September, the last division of the allied troops arrived in James River, and were disembarked at the landing near Williamsburg; soon after which, the preparations for the siege were completed.

On September 25th, the final group of allied troops arrived at James River and was unloaded at the landing near Williamsburg; shortly after that, the preparations for the siege were finished.

Yorktown invested.

York is a small village on the south side of the river which bears that name, where the long peninsula between the York and the James, is only eight miles wide. In this broad and bold river, a ship of the line may ride in safety. Its southern banks are high, and, on the opposite shore, is Gloucester Point, a piece of land projecting deep into the river, and narrowing it, at that place, to the space of one mile. Both these posts were occupied by Lord Cornwallis.[Pg 398] The communication between them was commanded by his batteries, and by some ships of war which lay under his guns.

York is a small village on the south side of the river that shares its name, where the long peninsula between the York and the James is only eight miles wide. In this wide and powerful river, a warship can safely anchor. Its southern banks are steep, and on the other side is Gloucester Point, a piece of land that juts deep into the river, narrowing it to just one mile at that spot. Both of these positions were held by Lord Cornwallis.[Pg 398] The communication between them was controlled by his artillery and several warships that were positioned under his guns.

The main body of his army was encamped on the open grounds about Yorktown, within a range of outer redoubts and field works, calculated to command the peninsula, and impede the approach of the assailants; and Lieutenant Colonel Dundass, with a small detachment consisting of six or seven hundred men, held the post at Gloucester Point. He was afterwards reinforced by Lieutenant Colonel Tarlton.

The main part of his army was camped on the open fields around Yorktown, surrounded by a series of outer earthworks and fortifications designed to control the peninsula and hinder the attackers’ advance. Lieutenant Colonel Dundass, with a small unit of about six or seven hundred men, was stationed at Gloucester Point. He was later reinforced by Lieutenant Colonel Tarleton.

The legion of Lauzun, and a brigade of militia under General Weedon, the whole commanded by the French General de Choisé, were directed to watch the enemy on the side of Gloucester; and, on the twenty-eighth, the grand combined army moved down on the south side of the river, by different roads, towards Yorktown. About noon, the heads of the columns reached the ground assigned them respectively; and, after driving in the piquets and some cavalry, encamped for the evening. The next day, the right wing, consisting of Americans, extended farther to the right, and occupied the ground east of Beverdam creek; while the left wing, consisting of French, was stationed on the west side of that stream. In the course of the night, Lord Cornwallis withdrew from his outer lines; and the works he had evacuated were, the[Pg 399] next day, occupied by the besieging army, which now invested the town completely on that side.

The Legion of Lauzun and a brigade of militia led by General Weedon, all under the command of French General de Choisé, were assigned to monitor the enemy near Gloucester. On the twenty-eighth, the combined army moved down the south side of the river on different roads toward Yorktown. Around noon, the front lines arrived at their assigned positions, and after driving back the pickets and some cavalry, they set up camp for the night. The next day, the right wing, made up of Americans, moved further right and took control of the area east of Beverdam Creek, while the left wing, made up of French troops, was stationed on the west side of the stream. During the night, Lord Cornwallis pulled back from his outer lines, and the defenses he abandoned were occupied by the besieging army the next day, which completely surrounded the town on that side.

Two thousand men were stationed on the Gloucester side for the purpose of keeping up a rigorous blockade. On approaching the lines, a sharp skirmish took place which terminated unfavourably for the British; after which they remained under cover of their works, making no attempt to interrupt the blockade.

Two thousand men were positioned on the Gloucester side to maintain a strict blockade. As they approached the lines, a brief skirmish occurred, which ended poorly for the British; afterward, they stayed behind their defenses and made no effort to break the blockade.

October 6.

On the night of the sixth of October, until which time the besieging army was incessantly employed in disembarking their heavy artillery and military stores, and drawing them to camp, the first parallel was commenced within six hundred yards of the British lines. This operation was conducted with so much silence, that it appears not to have been perceived until the return of daylight disclosed it to the garrison; by which time the trenches were in such forwardness as to cover the men. By the evening of the ninth, several batteries and redoubts were completed, and the effect of their fire was soon perceived. New batteries were opened the next day, and the fire became so heavy that the besieged withdrew their cannon from the embrasures, and scarcely returned a shot. The shells and red hot balls from the batteries of the allied army reached the ships in the harbour, and, in the evening, set fire to the Charon of forty-four guns, and to three large transports, which were entirely consumed. Reciprocal esteem, and a[Pg 400] spirit of emulation between the French and Americans, being carefully cultivated by the Commander-in-chief, the siege was carried on with great rapidity. October.The second parallel was opened, on the night of the eleventh, within three hundred yards of the British lines. The three succeeding days were devoted to the completion of this parallel, during which the fire of the garrison, which had opened several new embrasures, became more destructive than at any previous time. The men in the trenches were particularly annoyed by two redoubts advanced three hundred yards in front of the British works, which flanked the second parallel of the besiegers. Preparations were made, on the fourteenth, to carry them both by storm. The attack of one was committed to the Americans, and of the other to the French. The Marquis de Lafayette commanded the American detachment, and the Baron de Viominel the French. Towards the close of the day, the two detachments marched with equal firmness to the assault. Colonel Hamilton, who had commanded a battalion of light infantry throughout this campaign, led the advanced corps of the Americans; and Colonel Laurens turned the redoubt at the head of eighty men, in order to take the garrison in reverse, and intercept their retreat. The troops rushed to the charge without firing a gun and without giving the sappers time to remove the abattis and palisades.[Pg 401] Passing over them, they assaulted the works with irresistible impetuosity on all sides at the same time, and entered them with such rapidity that their loss was inconsiderable.[85] This redoubt was defended by Major Campbell, with some inferior officers, and forty-five privates. The major, a captain, a subaltern, and seventeen privates, were made prisoners, and eight privates were killed while the assailants were entering the works.

On the night of October 6th, the besieging army was busy unloading their heavy artillery and military supplies and moving them to camp. They started the first parallel just six hundred yards from the British lines. This operation was carried out so quietly that it wasn’t noticed until daylight revealed it to the garrison; by that time, the trenches were advanced enough to cover the men. By the evening of the 9th, several batteries and redoubts were finished, and the impact of their fire was soon felt. New batteries were activated the next day, and the fire became so intense that the besieged removed their cannons from the embrasures and hardly returned fire. The shells and hot balls from the allied army's batteries hit ships in the harbor, and in the evening, they set fire to the Charon, a 44-gun ship, along with three large transports, which were completely destroyed. A mutual respect and competitive spirit between the French and Americans, carefully fostered by the Commander-in-chief, helped the siege progress quickly. The second parallel was opened on the night of the 11th, just three hundred yards from the British lines. The next three days were dedicated to finishing this parallel, during which the garrison, having opened several new embrasures, fired more destructively than ever before. The troops in the trenches were particularly bothered by two redoubts positioned three hundred yards in front of the British works, which flanked the besiegers' second parallel. Preparations were made on the 14th to capture both by assault. The Americans were assigned to attack one redoubt, while the French took the other. The Marquis de Lafayette led the American group, and the Baron de Viominel commanded the French. As the day ended, both groups marched with equal determination to the attack. Colonel Hamilton, who had led a battalion of light infantry during the campaign, led the Americans' advance party; Colonel Laurens flanked the redoubt with eighty men to trap the garrison and cut off their escape. The troops charged without firing a shot and didn’t give the sappers time to clear the obstacles. They climbed over and attacked the works with unstoppable force from all sides, entering so quickly that their casualties were minimal. This redoubt was defended by Major Campbell, some lower-ranking officers, and forty-five privates. The major, a captain, a subaltern, and seventeen privates were taken prisoner, and eight privates were killed while the attackers were entering the works.

The redoubt attacked by the French was defended by a greater number of men; and the resistance, being greater, was not overcome so quickly, or with so little loss. One hundred and twenty men, commanded by a lieutenant colonel, were in this work, eighteen of whom were killed, and forty-two, including a captain and two subaltern officers, were made prisoners.[Pg 402] The assailants lost, in killed and wounded, near one hundred men.

The redoubt that the French attacked was defended by a larger group of men, and because the resistance was stronger, it wasn't taken as quickly or with so few losses. One hundred and twenty men, led by a lieutenant colonel, were stationed there, with eighteen killed and forty-two, including a captain and two junior officers, captured.[Pg 402] The attackers suffered nearly one hundred casualties, both killed and wounded.

The Commander-in-chief was highly gratified with the active courage displayed in this assault. Speaking of it in his diary, he says—"The bravery exhibited by the attacking troops was emulous and praiseworthy. Few cases have exhibited greater proofs of intrepidity, coolness, and firmness, than were shown on this occasion." The orders of the succeeding day, congratulating the army on the capture of these important works, expressed a high sense of the judicious dispositions and gallant conduct of both the Baron de Viominel and the Marquis de Lafayette, and requested them to convey to every officer and man engaged in the enterprise, the acknowledgments of the Commander-in-chief for the spirit and rapidity with which they advanced to the attack, and for the admirable firmness with which they supported themselves under the fire of the enemy without returning a shot. "The general reflects," concluding the orders, "with the highest degree of pleasure, on the confidence which the troops of the two nations must hereafter have in each other. Assured of mutual support, he is convinced there is no danger which they will not cheerfully encounter, no difficulty which they will not bravely overcome."[86]

The Commander-in-Chief was very pleased with the bravery shown during this attack. In his diary, he wrote, "The courage displayed by the attacking troops was commendable and worthy of praise. Few instances have shown greater proof of fearlessness, composure, and determination than what was demonstrated today." The orders for the following day congratulated the army on capturing these key positions, highlighting the wise strategies and heroic actions of both Baron de Viominel and Marquis de Lafayette. They were asked to pass on the Commander-in-Chief's gratitude to every officer and soldier involved for their spirit and quickness in launching the attack and for their remarkable steadiness as they stood their ground under the enemy's fire without returning fire. "The general reflects," the orders concluded, "with great pleasure on the trust that the troops of both nations will have in each other from now on. Confident in mutual support, he believes there is no danger they won’t face together and no challenge they won’t overcome courageously." [86]

 

Moore House

Moore House

 The Moore House at Yorktown, Virginia

The Moore House at Yorktown, Virginia

Where the terms for the surrender of the British army were arranged between Washington and Cornwallis. The actual drafting of the terms was done by the Viscount de Noailles and Lieutenant-Colonel Laurens, representing the French-American forces, and Colonel Dundas and Major Ross for the British.

Where the terms for the British army's surrender were arranged between Washington and Cornwallis. The actual drafting of the terms was carried out by the Viscount de Noailles and Lieutenant-Colonel Laurens, representing the French-American forces, and Colonel Dundas and Major Ross for the British.

 

During the same night, these redoubts were included in the second parallel; and, in the course of the next day, some howitzers were placed in them, which, by five in the afternoon, were opened on the besieged.

During the same night, these fortifications were included in the second line; and, by the next day, some howitzers were set up in them, which began firing on the besieged by five in the afternoon.

The situation of Lord Cornwallis was becoming desperate. His works were sinking, in every quarter, under the fire of the besiegers. The batteries already playing on him had silenced nearly all his guns, and the second parallel was about to open, which must in a few hours render the town untenable. To suspend a catastrophe which appeared almost inevitable, he resolved on attempting to retard the completion of the second parallel, by a vigorous sortie against two batteries which appeared to be in the greatest forwardness, and were guarded by French troops. October 16.The party making this sortie was led by Lieutenant Colonel Abercrombie, who attacked the two batteries with great impetuosity about four in the morning, and carried both with inconsiderable loss; but the guards from the trenches immediately advancing on the assailants, they retreated without being able to effect any thing of importance.[Pg 404]

The situation for Lord Cornwallis was becoming desperate. His defenses were collapsing under the fire from the attackers. The artillery targeting him had silenced nearly all his cannons, and the second line of attack was about to begin, which would make the town impossible to defend in just a few hours. To delay what seemed unavoidable, he decided to try to slow down the completion of the second line by launching a strong counterattack against two batteries that were almost ready and were guarded by French troops. October 16th.The group leading this counterattack was headed by Lieutenant Colonel Abercrombie, who struck the two batteries with great force around four in the morning, capturing both with minimal loss. However, the guards from the trenches quickly moved to confront the attackers, forcing them to retreat without achieving anything significant.[Pg 404]

About four in the afternoon the besiegers opened several batteries in their second parallel; and it was apparent that, in the course of the ensuing day, the whole line of batteries in that parallel would be ready to play on the town. The works of the besieged were not in a condition to sustain so tremendous a fire. In this extremity, Lord Cornwallis formed the bold design of forcing his way to New York.

About four in the afternoon, the attackers set up several batteries in their second line; and it was clear that, by the end of the day, the entire line of batteries in that position would be ready to fire on the town. The defenses of the besieged weren't in a state to handle such intense firepower. In this critical situation, Lord Cornwallis came up with a daring plan to break through to New York.

He determined to leave his sick and baggage behind, and, crossing over in the night with his effectives to the Gloucester shore, to attack De Choisé. After cutting to pieces or dispersing the troops under that officer, he intended to mount his infantry on the horses taken from that detachment, and on others to be seized on the road, and, by a rapid march to gain the fords of the great rivers, and, forcing his way through Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Jersey, to form a junction with the army in New York.[87]

He decided to leave his sick and baggage behind and, crossing over at night with his effective troops to the Gloucester shore, attack De Choisé. After defeating or scattering the forces under that officer, he planned to put his infantry on the horses taken from that unit and others captured along the way, and by marching quickly, reach the fords of the major rivers, forcing his way through Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Jersey to join up with the army in New York.[87]

This desperate attempt would be extremely hazardous; but the situation of the British general had become so hopeless, that it could scarcely be changed for the worse.

This desperate attempt would be very risky; but the British general's situation had become so hopeless that it could barely get any worse.

Boats prepared under other pretexts were held in readiness to receive the troops at ten in the evening, and convey them over the river. The arrangements were made with such secrecy that the first embarkation arrived at the point unperceived, and part of the troops were landed,[Pg 405] when a sudden and violent storm interrupted the execution of this hazardous plan, and drove the boats down the river. The storm continued till near daylight, when the boats returned. But the plan was necessarily abandoned, and the boats were sent to bring back the soldiers, who were relanded on the southern shore in the course of the forenoon without much loss.

Boats prepared under different pretenses were ready to take the troops across the river at ten in the evening. The arrangements were made so secretly that the first group of soldiers arrived at the landing point unnoticed, and part of the troops were disembarked,[Pg 405] when a sudden and fierce storm disrupted this risky plan and blew the boats down the river. The storm lasted until just before dawn, when the boats came back. However, the plan had to be called off, and the boats were sent to bring back the soldiers, who were safely landed on the southern shore later that morning without significant losses.

October 17.

In the morning of the seventeenth, several new batteries were opened in the second parallel, which poured in a weight of fire not to be resisted. The place being no longer tenable, Lord Cornwallis, about ten in the forenoon, beat a parley, and proposed a cessation of hostilities for twenty-four hours, that commissioners might meet at Moore's house, which was just in the rear of the first parallel, to settle terms for the surrender of the posts of York and Gloucester. To this letter General Washington returned an immediate answer declaring his "ardent desire to spare the further effusion of blood, and his readiness to listen to such terms as were admissible;" but as in the present crisis he could not consent to lose a moment in fruitless negotiations, he desired that "previous to the meeting of the commissioners, the proposals of his lordship might be transmitted in writing, for which purpose a suspension of hostilities for two hours should be granted." The general propositions[88] stated by Lord Cornwallis as forming the basis[Pg 406] of the capitulation, though not all admissible, being such as led to the opinion that no great difficulty would occur in adjusting the terms, the suspension of hostilities was prolonged for the night. In the mean time, to avoid the delay of useless discussion, the Commander-in-chief drew up and proposed such articles[89] as he would be willing to grant. These were transmitted to Lord Cornwallis with the accompanying declaration that, if he approved them, commissioners might be immediately appointed to digest them into form. October 18.In consequence of this message, the Viscount de Noailles, and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, were met next day by Colonel Dundass and Major Ross; but, being unable to adjust the terms of capitulation definitively, only a rough draught of them could be prepared, which was to be submitted to the consideration of the British general. Determined not to expose himself to those accidents which time might produce, General Washington could not permit any suspense on the part of Lord Cornwallis. He therefore immediately directed the rough articles which had been prepared by the commissioners to be fairly transcribed, and sent them to his lordship early next morning, with a letter expressing his expectation that they would be signed by eleven, and that the garrison would march out by two in the afternoon. Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.Finding all attempts to obtain better terms un[Pg 407]availing, Lord Cornwallis submitted to a necessity no longer to be avoided, and, on the 19th of October, surrendered the posts of Yorktown and Gloucester Point, with their garrisons, and the ships in the harbour with their seamen, to the land and naval forces of America and France.

In the morning of the 17th, several new artillery batteries were set up in the second parallel, delivering an overwhelming amount of firepower. With the situation no longer sustainable, Lord Cornwallis, around 10 AM, called for a truce and suggested a 24-hour pause in fighting so that representatives could meet at Moore's house, located just behind the first parallel, to negotiate the terms for surrendering the posts of York and Gloucester. General Washington quickly responded to this letter, expressing his "strong desire to prevent any further loss of life, and his willingness to consider terms that were reasonable." However, given the urgency of the situation, he couldn't agree to delay in pointless negotiations and requested that "before the commissioners met, Lord Cornwallis's proposals be sent in writing, for which a two-hour ceasefire should be established." The main proposals[88] from Lord Cornwallis, which formed the basis[Pg 406] of the capitulation, while not all acceptable, indicated that reaching an agreement shouldn't be too challenging, so the ceasefire was extended until nightfall. In the meantime, to prevent any delays from unnecessary discussions, the Commander-in-chief drafted and proposed terms[89] he was willing to accept. These were sent to Lord Cornwallis along with a note stating that if he approved them, commissioners could be appointed immediately to finalize the details. October 18th. As a result of this message, Viscount de Noailles and Lieutenant Colonel Laurens met the next day with Colonel Dundass and Major Ross; however, they couldn't finalize the terms of the capitulation, so only a rough draft could be prepared for the British general's review. Determined not to risk delays that could arise, General Washington couldn’t allow Lord Cornwallis to stall. He quickly ordered the rough articles created by the commissioners to be neatly copied and sent them to his lordship early the next morning, along with a letter expressing his expectation that they would be signed by 11 AM and that the garrison would leave by 2 PM. Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.Finding that all attempts to negotiate better terms were futile, Lord Cornwallis surrendered on October 19, giving up the posts of Yorktown and Gloucester Point, along with their garrisons and the ships in the harbor with their crews, to the land and naval forces of America and France.

Nineteenth.

The army, artillery, arms, military chest, and public stores of every denomination, were surrendered to General Washington; the ships and seamen, to the Count de Grasse. The total number of prisoners,[90] excluding seamen, rather exceeded seven thousand men. The loss sustained by the garrison during the siege, amounted to five hundred and fifty-two men, including six officers.

The army, artillery, weapons, military supplies, and public resources of all kinds were handed over to General Washington; the ships and sailors were given to Count de Grasse. The total number of prisoners,[90] excluding sailors, was just over seven thousand men. The garrison lost five hundred and fifty-two men during the siege, which included six officers.

Lord Cornwallis endeavoured to introduce an article into the capitulation, for the security of those Americans who had joined the British army; but the subject was declared to belong to the civil department, and the article was rejected. Its object, however, was granted without appearing to concede it. His lordship was permitted to send the Bonetta sloop of war untouched, with despatches to Sir Henry Clinton;[Pg 408] and the Americans whose conduct had been most offensive to their countrymen were embarked on board this vessel.

Lord Cornwallis tried to include a provision in the agreement to protect the Americans who had joined the British army, but it was said to fall under civil matters and was turned down. However, the goal was accomplished without it seeming like a concession. He was allowed to send the Bonetta sloop of war intact, carrying messages to Sir Henry Clinton;[Pg 408] and the Americans who had been the most troublesome to their fellow countrymen were put on this ship.

The allied army may be estimated, including militia, at sixteen thousand men. In the course of this siege, they lost, in killed and wounded, about three hundred. The treaty was opened on the eleventh day after the ground was broken by the besiegers, and the capitulation was signed on the thirteenth. The whole army merited great approbation; but, from the nature of the service, the artillerists and engineers were enabled to distinguish themselves particularly. Generals du Portail and Knox were each promoted to the rank of Major General; and Colonel Govion, and Captain Rochfontaine, of the corps of engineers, were each advanced a grade by brevet. In addition to the officers belonging to those departments, Generals Lincoln, De Lafayette, and Steuben, were particularly mentioned by the Commander-in-chief, in his orders issued the day after the capitulation; and terms of peculiar warmth were applied to Governor Nelson, who continued in the field during the whole siege, at the head of the militia of Virginia; and also exerted himself, in a particular manner, to furnish the army with those supplies which the country afforded. The highest acknowledgments were made to the Count de Rochambeau; and several other French officers were named with distinction. So many dis[Pg 409]asters had attended the former efforts of the United States to avail themselves of the succours occasionally afforded by France, that an opinion not very favourable to the alliance appears to have gained some ground in the country, and to have insinuated itself into the army. The Commander-in-chief seized this occasion to discountenance a course of thinking from which he had always feared pernicious consequences, and displayed the great value of the aids lately received, in language highly flattering to the French monarch, as well as to the land and naval forces of that nation.

The allied army, including the militia, is estimated to be around sixteen thousand men. During this siege, they lost about three hundred soldiers who were killed or wounded. The treaty was initiated on the eleventh day after the besiegers began their work, and the capitulation was signed on the thirteenth. The entire army deserved great praise; however, due to the nature of their duties, the artillerymen and engineers were able to stand out in particular. Generals du Portail and Knox were both promoted to Major General, while Colonel Govion and Captain Rochfontaine from the engineers were each advanced a rank by brevet. Along with the officers in those departments, Generals Lincoln, De Lafayette, and Steuben were specifically recognized by the Commander-in-chief in the orders issued the day after the capitulation. Particular praise was also given to Governor Nelson, who stayed in the field throughout the entire siege, leading the Virginia militia and making a special effort to provide the army with supplies from the region. The highest acknowledgments were given to Count de Rochambeau, and several other French officers were also recognized. Many setbacks had accompanied previous attempts by the United States to benefit from the occasional support provided by France, leading to a somewhat negative perception of the alliance within the country and even among the army. The Commander-in-chief took this opportunity to discourage that kind of thinking, which he had always feared could be harmful, and highlighted the immense value of the recent assistance in language that was highly complimentary to the French king as well as to the land and naval forces of that nation.

Knowing the influence which the loss of the army in Virginia must have on the war, Sir Henry Clinton determined to hazard much for its preservation. About seven thousand of his best troops sailed for the Chesapeake, under convoy of a fleet augmented to twenty-five ships of the line. This armament left the Hook the day on which the capitulation was signed at Yorktown, and appeared off the capes of Virginia on the 24th of October. Unquestionable intelligence being there received that Lord Cornwallis had surrendered, the British general returned to New York.

Knowing how the loss of the army in Virginia would impact the war, Sir Henry Clinton decided to risk a lot to save it. Around seven thousand of his best troops set sail for the Chesapeake, protected by a fleet that had been increased to twenty-five ships of the line. This force left the Hook on the same day the surrender was signed at Yorktown and arrived off the coast of Virginia on October 24th. Upon receiving undeniable information that Lord Cornwallis had surrendered, the British general went back to New York.

The exultation manifested throughout the United States at the capture of this formidable army was equal to the terror it had inspired. In congress, the intelligence was received with joy proportioned to the magnitude of the event;[Pg 410] and the sense of that body on this brilliant achievement was expressed in various resolutions, returning the thanks of the United States to the Commander-in-chief, to the Count de Rochambeau, to the Count de Grasse, to the officers of the allied army generally, and to the corps of artillery, and engineers particularly. In addition to these testimonials of gratitude, it was resolved that a marble column should be erected at Yorktown, in Virginia, with emblems of the alliance between the United States and his Most Christian Majesty, and inscribed with a succinct narrative of the surrender of Earl Cornwallis to his Excellency General Washington, the Commander-in-chief of the combined forces of America and France; to his Excellency the Count de Rochambeau, commanding the auxiliary troops of his Most Christian Majesty in America; and to his Excellency Count de Grasse, commanding in chief the naval army of France in the Chesapeake. Two stand of colours taken in Yorktown were presented to General Washington; two pieces of field ordnance to the Count de Rochambeau; and application was made to his Most Christian Majesty, to permit the Admiral to accept a testimonial of their approbation similar to that presented to the Count de Rochambeau. Congress determined to go in solemn procession to the Dutch Lutheran church, to return thanks to Almighty God for crowning the allied arms with success, by the[Pg 411] surrender of the whole British army under Lord Cornwallis; and also issued a proclamation, appointing the 13th day of December for general thanksgiving and prayer, on account of this signal interposition of Divine Providence.

The excitement across the United States at the capture of this strong army matched the fear it had caused. In Congress, the news was received with joy equivalent to the significance of the event;[Pg 410] and the body’s sentiments on this remarkable achievement were expressed through various resolutions, thanking the United States Commander-in-chief, Count de Rochambeau, Count de Grasse, the officers of the allied army in general, and particularly the artillery and engineering corps. In addition to these expressions of gratitude, it was decided that a marble column would be erected at Yorktown, Virginia, featuring symbols of the alliance between the United States and His Most Christian Majesty, inscribed with a brief account of Earl Cornwallis's surrender to General Washington, the Commander-in-chief of the combined American and French forces; to Count de Rochambeau, who commanded the auxiliary troops of His Most Christian Majesty in America; and to Count de Grasse, who commanded the French naval army in the Chesapeake. Two flags captured at Yorktown were presented to General Washington; two pieces of field artillery were given to Count de Rochambeau; and a request was made to His Most Christian Majesty to allow the Admiral to accept a recognition similar to that given to Count de Rochambeau. Congress decided to hold a solemn procession to the Dutch Lutheran church to thank Almighty God for the success of the allied forces, marked by the[Pg 411] surrender of the entire British army under Lord Cornwallis; they also issued a proclamation declaring December 13th as a day for general thanksgiving and prayer for this remarkable act of Divine Providence.

It was not by congress only that the public joy at this great event, and the public approbation of the conduct of General Washington were displayed. The most flattering and affectionate addresses of congratulation were presented from every part of the union; and state governments, corporate towns, and learned institutions, vied with each other in the testimonials they gave of their high sense of his important services, and of their attachment to his person and character.

It wasn't just Congress that showed public joy at this great event, or that approved of General Washington's actions. People from all over the country sent their most flattering and heartfelt congratulatory messages. State governments, towns, and educational institutions competed to express their deep appreciation for his significant contributions, along with their admiration for him as a person and leader.

The superiority of the allied force opened a prospect of still farther advantages. The remaining posts of the British in the southern states were too weak to be defended against the army which had triumphed over Lord Cornwallis; and the troops which occupied them could neither escape nor be reinforced, if the Count de Grasse could be prevailed on to co-operate against them. Although, in his first conference, he had explicitly declared his inability to engage in any enterprise to be undertaken subsequent to that against Yorktown,[91] the siege of that place had employed so much less time than the admiral had consented to appropriate to it, that the general resumed his plan[Pg 412] of southern operations. In a letter addressed to De Grasse, he used every argument which might operate on his love of fame, or his desire to promote the interests of the allies, to prevail on him to co-operate in an expedition against Charleston. If this object should be unattainable, his attention was next turned to Wilmington, in North Carolina, which was still occupied by a small detachment of British troops who kept that state in check. The capture of this detachment, though not an object of much consequence in itself, was supposed to derive some importance from the influence which the complete liberation of North Carolina might have on the future military operations of the United States, and on their negotiations. General Washington proposed to send a detachment intended to reinforce General Greene, as far as Wilmington, under convoy. The reduction of that place, he supposed, would detain the fleet but a few days, after which it might proceed to the West Indies.

The strength of the allied force opened up the possibility of even more advantages. The remaining British posts in the southern states were too weak to defend against the army that had defeated Lord Cornwallis, and the troops stationed there couldn’t escape or be reinforced if Count de Grasse could be persuaded to work with them. Even though he initially stated that he couldn't engage in any operations after the one at Yorktown,[91] the siege had taken much less time than the admiral had initially agreed to, prompting the general to continue with his plans for southern operations.[Pg 412] In a letter to De Grasse, he used every argument that might appeal to his desire for glory or his wish to support the allies, trying to convince him to join in an expedition against Charleston. If that goal proved impossible, he then shifted his focus to Wilmington in North Carolina, which was still held by a small British force that kept the state under control. Capturing this small force, while not a highly significant objective by itself, was thought to be important because fully liberating North Carolina could affect the future military strategies of the United States and their negotiations. General Washington planned to send a unit to reinforce General Greene, heading toward Wilmington under escort. He believed that taking Wilmington would only require a few days for the fleet, after which it could head to the West Indies.

To enforce the representations contained in his letter, as well as to pay his respects to the admiral, and to express in person the high sense entertained of his important services, the Commander-in-chief repaired on board the Ville de Paris. October 23.The Count acknowledged his conviction of the advantages to be expected from an expedition against Charleston; but said, that "the orders of his court, ulterior projects, and his en[Pg 413]gagements with the Spaniards, rendered it impossible for him to remain on the coast during the time which would be required for the operation." As he also declined taking on board the troops designed to reinforce General Greene, preparations were made for their march by land; and Major General St. Clair, who commanded the detachment, was ordered to take Wilmington in his route, and to gain possession of that post.

To follow up on the statements in his letter, to pay his respects to the admiral, and to personally express his appreciation for the admiral’s important services, the Commander-in-chief went on board the Ville de Paris. October 23rd. The Count acknowledged his belief in the benefits of an expedition against Charleston, but said that "the orders from his court, future plans, and his commitments to the Spaniards made it impossible for him to stay on the coast for the time needed for the operation." As he also refused to take aboard the troops meant to reinforce General Greene, preparations were made for their march by land, and Major General St. Clair, who was in charge of the detachment, was ordered to take Wilmington on his way and to seize control of that post.

November.

The Count de Grasse having consented to remain in the bay a few days for the purpose of covering the transportation of the eastern troops, and of the ordnance to the Head of Elk, they were embarked in the beginning of November, under the command of General Lincoln, who was directed to march them into New Jersey and New York, and to canton them for the winter in those states.[92] The French troops remained in Virginia, not only for the protection of that state, but to be in readiness to march southward or northward, as the exigencies of the ensuing campaign might require.

The Count de Grasse agreed to stay in the bay for a few days to oversee the transport of the eastern troops and equipment to the Head of Elk. They were loaded onto ships at the beginning of November, led by General Lincoln, who was instructed to take them into New Jersey and New York and set them up for the winter in those states.[92] The French troops stayed in Virginia, not only to protect the state but also to be ready to move south or north as the needs of the upcoming campaign might demand.

The transportation of the troops and ordnance to the Head of Elk being effected, the Count de Grasse sailed for the West Indies, and the Commander-in-chief proceeded to Philadelphia.

The troops and weapons were moved to the Head of Elk, and then the Count de Grasse set sail for the West Indies, while the Commander-in-chief headed to Philadelphia.


NOTES.

NOTE—No. I. See Page 3

The following petition addressed to Governor Livingston, will furnish some evidence of the situation to which that part of Jersey was reduced.

The petition below addressed to Governor Livingston provides some evidence of the situation that part of Jersey came to.

To his excellency William Livingston, esquire, governor, captain general, and commander-in-chief in and over the state of New Jersey and the territories thereunto belonging in America, chancellor and ordinary in the same—the humble petition of the officers, civil and military, whose names are hereunto subscribed,

To His Excellency William Livingston, Esquire, Governor, Captain General, and Commander-in-Chief of the State of New Jersey and its territories in America, Chancellor and Ordinary in the same—the humble petition of the undersigned civil and military officers,

Showeth,—That a large detachment of the British army, a few weeks ago, made an invasion into the lower counties of this state on Delaware, and plundered a few of the inhabitants. That at present a large detachment are invading them a second time. That the enemy in this second incursion, have, as we have been credibly informed, by the express orders of Colonel Mawhood, the commanding officer, bayoneted and butchered in the most inhuman manner, a number of the militia who have unfortunately fallen into their hands. That Colonel Mawhood immediately after the massacre, in open letters, sent to both officers and privates by a flag, had the effrontery to insult us with a demand, that we should lay down our arms, and if not, threatened to burn, destroy, and lay the whole country waste, and more especially the property of a number of our most distinguished men, whom he named. That he has since put his threat into execution, in one instance, by burning one of the finest dwelling houses in Salem county, and all the other buildings on the same farm, the property of Colonel Benjamin Home. That plunder, rapine, and devastation in the most fertile and populous parts of these counties, widely mark their footsteps wherever they go. That they are spreading disaffection, they are using every possible means to corrupt the minds of the people, who, within their lines, have so little virtue as to purchase from them.

Shows that a large group of the British army, a few weeks ago, invaded the lower counties of this state in Delaware and looted some of the residents. Currently, a large group is invading them for a second time. In this second attack, the enemy, as we have been reliably informed, on the direct orders of Colonel Mawhood, the commanding officer, bayoneted and brutally killed a number of the militia who unfortunately fell into their hands. Immediately after the massacre, Colonel Mawhood, in open letters sent to both officers and privates by a flag, had the audacity to insult us with a demand that we surrender our weapons, threatening that if we didn’t, he would burn, destroy, and devastate the entire region, especially targeting the property of some of our most respected individuals, whom he named. He has since carried out his threat, notably by burning one of the finest houses in Salem County and all other buildings on the same farm, owned by Colonel Benjamin Home. Plunder, robbery, and destruction in the most fertile and populated areas of these counties widely mark their path wherever they go. They are spreading discontent and are doing everything they can to corrupt the minds of the people who, within their control, have so little integrity as to buy from them.

That we are in no state of defence. That we are so exposed by reason of our situation, that some of our officers, civil and military, have moved out of the counties for safety. That our militia, during the last winter, have been so[Pg 416] fatigued out by repeated calls and continued service, and disaffection is now so widely diffused, that very few can be called out, in some places, none. That we have no troops of light horse regularly embodied, there is a scarcity of small arms among us, and no field pieces. That in these two incursions, we have very sensibly felt the want of field pieces and artillery men, that the number of us assembled is so small, that though we should use the greatest conduct and bravery, we could only provoke, not injure our enemy.

That we are not in a state of defense. That we are so vulnerable due to our situation that some of our civil and military officers have left the counties for safety. That our militia, during the last winter, have been so[Pg 416] exhausted by repeated calls and ongoing service, and discontent is now so widespread that very few can be called upon, and in some places, none at all. That we have no light cavalry organized, there is a shortage of small arms among us, and no artillery. That in these two incursions, we have clearly felt the lack of artillery and gunners, and that the number of us gathered is so small that even if we act with the utmost care and bravery, we could only provoke, not harm, our enemy.

That the extent of our country is so great, that our small number of men fatigued out, indifferently armed and without field pieces, can not defend it. That, as Delaware runs all along those counties, we are liable to be attacked in numberless places.

That the size of our country is so vast, that our small group of exhausted men, poorly armed and without artillery, cannot defend it. That, since Delaware runs along those counties, we could be attacked in countless locations.

That the acquisition of these counties would be of great advantage to the enemy. That they could nearly maintain their whole army a campaign by the plunder, forage, and assistance they could draw from them. That although the United States might not need them, yet it might perhaps be adviseable to defend them, to prevent the advantage the enemy might receive from them. That our riches, and former virtue, make us a prey to an enemy, whose tender mercies are cruelties.

That taking over these counties would really benefit the enemy. They could almost support their entire army for a campaign through the looting, resources, and help they could get from them. Even though the United States might not need these counties, it might be a good idea to defend them to stop the enemy from gaining that advantage. Our wealth and past goodness make us an easy target for an enemy whose kindness is just a mask for their cruelty.

That in short, our situation is beyond description deplorable. That the powers civil and military are daily relaxing, and disaffection prevailing. That we can neither stay at our houses, go out, nor come in with safety. That we can neither plough, plant, sow, reap nor gather. That we are fast falling into poverty, distress, and into the hands of our enemy. That unless there can be sent to our relief and assistance a sufficient body of standing troops, we must be under the disagreeable necessity of leaving the country to the enemy, and removing ourselves and families to distant places for safety. That although the present detachment may be fled and gone, before the relief reaches us, yet a body of troops are necessary for our protection, as long as the enemy possess Philadelphia. And these are the sentiments not only of us the subscribers, but of all the rest of the officers civil and military, and other the good subjects of this state in these counties.[Pg 417]

Our situation is incredibly bad. The civil and military powers are weakening every day, and discontent is spreading. We can't stay at home, go out, or come back safely. We can't plow, plant, sow, reap, or gather crops. We're rapidly falling into poverty and distress, and we're at the mercy of our enemy. Unless we receive enough troops to help us, we will have no choice but to leave the country to the enemy and move our families to safer places. Even if the current troops leave before help arrives, we still need a military presence as long as the enemy controls Philadelphia. These feelings are shared not just by us, the signers, but by all the other civil and military officials, and good citizens of this state in these counties.[Pg 417]

NOTE—No. II. See Page 85

The following is the report made by the committee:

The following is the report from the committee:

"January 1, 1779. The committee appointed to confer with the Commander-in-chief on the operations of the next campaign, report, that the plan proposed by congress for the emancipation of Canada, in co-operation with an army from France, was the principal subject of the said conference.

"January 1, 1779. The committee selected to discuss with the Commander-in-chief about the next campaign’s operations reports that the plan suggested by Congress for freeing Canada, in collaboration with an army from France, was the main topic of that conference."

"That, impressed with a strong sense of the injury and disgrace which must attend an infraction of the proposed stipulations, on the part of these states, your committee have taken a general view of our finances, of the circumstances of our army, of the magazines of clothes, artillery, arms and ammunition, and of the provisions in store, and which can be collected in season.

"Your committee, understanding the serious consequences and embarrassment that would come from breaking the proposed agreements by these states, has taken a broad look at our finances, the state of our army, the supplies of clothing, artillery, weapons, and ammunition, as well as the provisions we currently have and can gather in time."

"Your committee have also attentively considered the intelligence and observations communicated to them by the Commander-in-chief, respecting the number of troops and strong holds of the enemy in Canada; their naval force, and entire command of the water communication with that country—the difficulties, while they possess such signal advantages, of penetrating it with an army by land—the obstacles which are to be surmounted in acquiring a naval superiority—the hostile temper of many of the surrounding Indian tribes towards these states, and above all the uncertainty whether the enemy will not persevere in their system of harassing and distressing our sea-coast and frontiers by a predatory war.

"Your committee has also carefully considered the information and observations shared by the Commander-in-Chief about the enemy's troop numbers and strongholds in Canada; their naval fleet and complete control of the waterways to that country—the challenges of sending an army in by land while they have such significant advantages—the obstacles that need to be overcome to gain naval superiority—the hostile attitude of many nearby Indian tribes towards these states, and, most importantly, the uncertainty of whether the enemy will continue their strategy of attacking and troubling our coastline and frontiers through guerrilla warfare."

"That on the most mature deliberation, your committee can not find room for a well grounded presumption that these states will be able to perform their part of the proposed stipulations. That in a measure of such moment, calculated to call forth, and direct to a single object a considerable portion of the force of our ally, which may otherwise be essentially employed, nothing else than the highest probability of success could justify congress in making the proposition.

"After careful consideration, your committee cannot find sufficient reason to believe that these states will be able to fulfill their part of the proposed agreements. Given the importance of such a measure, which aims to gather and direct a significant portion of our ally's resources—resources that might otherwise be critically needed—only the highest likelihood of success could justify Congress in making this proposal."

"Your committee are therefore of opinion that the negotiation in question, however desirable, and interesting, should be deferred until circumstances render the co-operation of these states more certain, practicable, and effectual.

"Your committee believes that the negotiation in question, while desirable and interesting, should be postponed until circumstances make cooperation between these states more assured, feasible, and effective."

"That the minister plenipotentiary of these states at the court of Versailles, the minister of France in Pennsylvania, and the minister of France, be respectively informed that[Pg 418] the operations of the next campaign must depend on such a variety of contingencies to arise, as well from our own internal circumstances and resources, as the progress and movements of our enemy, that time alone can mature and point out the plan which ought to be pursued. That congress, therefore, can not, with a degree of confidence answerable to the magnitude of the object, decide on the practicability of their co-operating the next campaign, in an enterprise for the emancipation of Canada; that every preparation in our power will nevertheless be made for acting with vigour against the common enemy, and every favourable incident embraced with alacrity, to facilitate, and hasten the freedom and independence of Canada, and her union with these states—events which congress, from motives of policy with respect to the United States, as well as of affection for their Canadian brethren, have greatly at heart."

"That the minister plenipotentiary of these states at the court of Versailles, the minister of France in Pennsylvania, and the minister of France, be informed that[Pg 418] the plans for the next campaign will depend on a variety of factors that arise from both our internal situations and resources, as well as the movements of our enemy. Only time can help us develop and clarify the strategy that should be followed. Therefore, Congress cannot confidently determine the feasibility of cooperating in the next campaign for the liberation of Canada, given the significance of the undertaking. However, we will make every preparation possible to act decisively against our common enemy, and we will eagerly seize any favorable opportunities to advance and expedite the freedom and independence of Canada, as well as its union with these states—goals that Congress deeply cares about for both strategic reasons regarding the United States and out of affection for our Canadian allies."

Mr. de Sevelinges in his introduction to Botta's History, recites the private instructions given to Mr. Girard on his mission to the United States. One article was, "to avoid entering into any formal engagement relative to Canada and other English possessions which congress proposed to conquer." Mr. de Sevelinges adds that "the policy of the cabinet of Versailles viewed the possession of those countries, especially of Canada by England, as a principle of useful inquietude and vigilance to the Americans. The neighbourhood of a formidable enemy must make them feel more sensibly the price which they ought to attach to the friendship and support of the king of France."

Mr. de Sevelinges, in his introduction to Botta's History, recounts the private instructions given to Mr. Girard regarding his mission to the United States. One point was, "to avoid making any formal commitments related to Canada and other English territories that Congress intended to conquer." Mr. de Sevelinges adds that "the policy of the Versailles cabinet viewed England's possession of those territories, especially Canada, as a key source of useful concern and vigilance for the Americans. The presence of a powerful enemy should make them more acutely aware of the value they should place on the friendship and support of the King of France."

The author has reason to believe that this policy was known to the Marquis de Lafayette when his devotion to the interests of the United States induced him to add his influence to their solicitations for aid to this enterprise.

The author believes that the Marquis de Lafayette was aware of this policy when his commitment to the interests of the United States prompted him to support their requests for help with this initiative.

NOTE—No. III. See Page 233

A letter to President Reed of Pennsylvania from which the following extracts are taken, is selected from many others written with the same view.

A letter to President Reed of Pennsylvania, from which the following excerpts are taken, is chosen from many others written with the same purpose.

"Morristown, May 28th, 1780.

Morristown, May 28, 1780.

"Dear Sir,—I am much obliged to you for your favour of the 23d. Nothing could be more necessary than the aid given by your state towards supplying us with provisions. I assure you, every idea you can form of our distresses, will[Pg 419] fall short of the reality. There is such a combination of circumstances to exhaust the patience of the soldiery, that it begins at length to be worn out, and we see in every line of the army, the most serious features of mutiny and sedition: all our departments, all our operations are at a stand; and unless a system very different from that which has for a long time prevailed, be immediately adopted throughout the states, our affairs must soon become desperate beyond the possibility of recovery. If you were on the spot, my dear sir, if you could see what difficulties surround us on every side, how unable we are to administer to the most ordinary calls of the service, you would be convinced that these expressions are not too strong: and that we have every thing to dread: Indeed I have almost ceased to hope. The country in general is in such a state of insensibility and indifference to its interests, that I dare not flatter myself with any change for the better.

"Dear Sir/Madam,—I really appreciate your support on the 23rd. The assistance from your state in providing us with supplies is absolutely essential. I can assure you that any idea you have of our struggles will[Pg 419] fall short of the reality. There’s such a combination of circumstances that is testing the patience of the soldiers, and it’s finally wearing thin; we see serious signs of mutiny and unrest throughout the army. All our departments and operations are at a standstill, and unless we adopt a very different system from what has been in place for a long time across the states, our situation will soon become hopeless. If you were here, dear sir, if you could see the difficulties we face on every side and how we are unable to meet even the most basic demands of the service, you would understand that my words are not excessive; we have everything to fear. In fact, I have nearly lost all hope. The country as a whole is in such a state of apathy and indifference to its own interests that I can’t allow myself to expect any improvement."

"The committee of congress in their late address to the several states, have given a just picture of our situation. I very much doubt its making the desired impression; and if it does not, I shall consider our lethargy as incurable. The present juncture is so interesting, that if it does not produce correspondent exertions, it will be a proof, that motives of honour, public good, and even self-preservation, have lost their influence upon our minds. This is a decisive moment, one of the most, I will go further and say, the most important America has seen. The court of France has made a glorious effort for our deliverance, and if we disappoint its intentions by our supineness, we must become contemptible in the eyes of all mankind; nor can we, after that, venture to confide that our allies will persist in an attempt to establish what it will appear we want inclination or ability to assist them in.

"The committee of Congress, in their recent address to the states, have painted an accurate picture of our situation. I'm really not sure it'll make the impact we hope for; and if it doesn’t, I’ll view our inactivity as hopeless. This moment is so critical that if it doesn’t lead to proper efforts, it will show that our sense of honor, public good, and even self-preservation have lost their hold on us. This is a decisive moment, one of the most important America has ever faced. The French government has made a commendable effort to help us, and if we let them down with our passivity, we'll become a laughingstock in the eyes of the world; after that, we can’t expect our allies to keep trying to establish something we seem unwilling or unable to support."

"Every view of our own circumstances ought to determine us to the most vigorous efforts; but there are considerations of another kind, that should have equal weight. The combined fleets of France and Spain last year were greatly superior to those of the enemy; the enemy nevertheless sustained no material damage, and at the close of the campaign gave a very important blow to our allies. This campaign, the difference between the fleets, from every account I have been able to collect, will be inconsiderable: indeed it is far from clear that there will be an equality. What are we to[Pg 420] expect will be the case if there should be another campaign? In all probability the advantage would be on the side of the English, and then what would become of America? We ought not to deceive ourselves. The maritime resources of Great Britain are more substantial and real than those of France and Spain united. Her commerce is more extensive than that of both her rivals; and it is an axiom, that the nation which has the most extensive commerce will always have the most powerful marine. Were this argument less convincing, the fact speaks for itself: her progress in the course of the last year is an incontestable proof.

"Every perspective on our circumstances should push us to put in our best efforts; however, there are other factors that should matter just as much. Last year, the combined fleets of France and Spain were significantly stronger than the enemy's; still, the enemy suffered no substantial losses and, by the end of the campaign, dealt a serious blow to our allies. This campaign, judging by all the information I’ve gathered, suggests that the difference between the fleets will be minimal: in fact, it’s far from certain that there will even be parity. What should we expect if there’s another campaign? Likely, the advantage would lie with the English, and then what would happen to America? We shouldn’t fool ourselves. Britain’s maritime resources are more solid and effective than those of France and Spain combined. Its trade is broader than that of both its competitors; it's a fact that the nation with the largest trade will always have the strongest navy. If this reasoning were less compelling, the evidence is clear: Britain’s progress over the past year is undeniable."

"It is true France in a manner created a fleet in a very short space, and this may mislead us in the judgment we form of her naval abilities. But if they bore any comparison with those of Great Britain, how comes it to pass, that with all the force of Spain added, she has lost so much ground in so short a time, as now to have scarcely a superiority. We should consider what was done by France, as a violent and unnatural effort of the government, which, for want of sufficient foundation, can not continue to operate proportionable effects.

"It’s true that France managed to build a fleet in a very short time, and this might mislead us in how we evaluate her naval capabilities. But if they were comparable to those of Great Britain, how is it that, even with all of Spain's power on her side, she has lost so much ground in such a short period that she now hardly holds any advantage? We should view what France accomplished as a forced and unnatural push by the government, which, lacking a solid foundation, cannot sustain proportional results."

"In modern wars, the longest purse must chiefly determine the event. I fear that of the enemy will be found to be so. Though the government is deeply in debt and of course poor, the nation is rich, and their riches afford a fund which will not be easily exhausted. Besides, their system of public credit is such, that it is capable of greater exertions than that of any other nation. Speculatists have been a long time foretelling its downfall; but we see no symptoms of the catastrophe being very near. I am persuaded it will at least last out the war.

"In modern wars, the longest wallet usually decides the outcome. I'm concerned that the enemy's will prove to be just that. Even though the government is heavily in debt and therefore short on cash, the nation is wealthy, and their wealth provides a resource that won't run out easily. Plus, their public credit system is stronger and can handle more pressure than any other nation. Speculators have been predicting its collapse for a while, but we don't see any signs of that happening anytime soon. I believe it will last at least until the end of the war."

"France is in a very different position. The abilities of the present financier, have done wonders; by a wise administration of the revenues, aided by advantageous loans, he has avoided the necessity of additional taxes. But I am well informed if the war continues another campaign, he will be obliged to have recourse to the taxes usual in time of war, which are very heavy, and which the people of France are not in a condition to endure for any length of time. When this necessity commences, France makes war on ruinous terms, and England, from her individual wealth, will find much greater facilities in supplying her exigencies.[Pg 421]

"France is in a very different situation. The current financier has performed wonders; through smart management of the revenues and beneficial loans, he has managed to avoid the need for higher taxes. However, I am well aware that if the war goes on for another campaign, he will have no choice but to implement the usual wartime taxes, which are quite heavy, and the people of France are not in a position to handle them for long. When this necessity arises, France will be fighting a war under severely disadvantageous conditions, while England, with its wealth, will have much greater means to meet its needs.[Pg 421]

"Spain derives great wealth from her mines, but it is not so great as is generally imagined. Of late years the profit to government is essentially diminished. Commerce and industry are the best mines of a nation; both which are wanted by her. I am told her treasury is far from being so well filled as we have flattered ourselves. She is also much divided on the propriety of the war. There is a strong party against it. The temper of the nation is too sluggish to admit of great exertions; and though the courts of the two kingdoms are closely linked together, there never has been in any of their wars, a perfect harmony of measures, nor has it been the case in this; which has already been no small detriment to the common cause.

"Spain gets a lot of wealth from her mines, but it's not as much as people usually think. Recently, the government's profit has significantly decreased. Trade and industry are the true treasures of a nation; both of which Spain lacks. I've heard that her treasury is nowhere near as flush as we have believed. There is also a lot of division over the war. There’s a strong group opposed to it. The nation’s spirit is too sluggish to support significant efforts; and even though the governments of the two kingdoms are closely connected, there has never been perfect coordination in any of their wars, and this one is no different, which has already harmed the common cause."

"I mention these things to show that the circumstances of our allies, as well as our own, call for peace, to obtain which we must make one great effort this campaign. The present instance of the friendship of the court of France, is attended with every circumstance that can render it important and agreeable, that can interest our gratitude or fire our emulation. If we do our duty we may even hope to make the campaign decisive of the contest. But we must do our duty in earnest, or disgrace and ruin will attend us. I am sincere in declaring a full persuasion that the succour will be fatal to us if our measures are not adequate to the emergency.

"I bring up these points to highlight that the situation of our allies, as well as our own, requires peace, which we can only achieve through one major effort this campaign. The current support from the French court comes with every aspect that makes it significant and beneficial, that can spark our gratitude or inspire us to strive harder. If we fulfill our responsibilities, we might even hope to make this campaign a turning point in the struggle. But we must take our responsibilities seriously; otherwise, we will face disgrace and downfall. I genuinely believe that the help we receive will be detrimental if our plans are not sufficient for the situation."

"Now, my dear sir, I must observe to you, that much will depend on the state of Pennsylvania. She has it in her power to contribute, without comparison, more to our success, than any other state, in the two essential articles of flour and transportation. I speak to you in the language of frankness, and as a friend. I do not mean to make any insinuations unfavourable to the state. I am aware of the embarrassment the government labours under from the open opposition of one party and the underhand intrigues of another. I know that with the best dispositions to promote the public service, you have been obliged to move with circumspection. But this is a time to hazard, and to take a tone of energy and decision. All parties but the disaffected will acquiesce in the necessity and give their support.

"Now, my dear sir, I must point out to you that a lot will depend on Pennsylvania. She has the ability to contribute, by far, more to our success than any other state, especially in the crucial areas of flour and transportation. I'm speaking to you honestly and as a friend. I don't intend to suggest anything negative about the state. I understand the difficulties the government faces due to the open opposition from one party and the secret scheming of another. I know that despite your best intentions to serve the public, you have had to act carefully. But this is a time to take risks and to adopt a tone of energy and decisiveness. All parties except for the disgruntled will agree on the necessity and offer their support."

"The matter is reduced to a point. Either Pennsylvania must give us all we ask, or we can undertake nothing. We must renounce every idea of co-operation, and must confess to our allies that we look wholly to them for our safety. This will be a state of humiliation and bitterness against[Pg 422] which the feelings of every good American ought to revolt. Yours I am convinced will, nor have I the least doubt, but that you will employ all your influence to animate the legislature and the people at large. The fate of these states hangs upon it. God grant we may be properly impressed with the consequences.

"The situation boils down to this: either Pennsylvania gives us everything we need, or we can't move forward. We have to abandon any idea of working together and admit to our allies that we are relying entirely on them for our safety. This will be a source of humiliation and frustration against[Pg 422] that should make every good American feel upset. I believe you will feel this way too, and I have no doubt that you will use all your influence to inspire the legislature and the people as a whole. The fate of these states depends on it. God help us to fully understand the consequences."

"I wish the legislature could be engaged to vest the executive with plenipotentiary powers. I should then expect every thing practicable from your abilities and zeal. This is not a time for formality and ceremony. The crisis in every point of view is extraordinary, and extraordinary expedients are necessary. I am decided in this opinion."

"I wish the legislature could be involved in giving the executive full powers. I would then expect everything possible from your skills and enthusiasm. This is not a time for rules and ceremony. The situation is extraordinary in every way, and we need extraordinary solutions. I am firm in this belief."

NOTE—No. IV. See Page 261

André having been unquestionably a spy, and his sentence consequently just; and the plot in which he had engaged having threatened consequences the most fatal to America; his execution, had he been an ordinary person, would certainly have been viewed with cold indifference. But he was not an ordinary person. In a letter written at the time by Colonel Hamilton, who in genius, in candour, and in romantic heroism, did not yield to this unfortunate Englishman, the character of André is thus feelingly and eloquently drawn. "There was something singularly interesting in the character and fortunes of André. To an excellent understanding, well improved by education and travel, he united a peculiar elegance of mind and manners, and the advantages of a pleasing person. It is said he possessed a pretty taste for the fine arts, and had himself attained some proficiency in poetry, music, and painting. His knowledge appeared without ostentation, and embellished by a diffidence that rarely accompanies so many talents and accomplishments, which left you to suppose more than appeared. His sentiments were elevated and inspired esteem, they had a softness that conciliated affection. His elocution was handsome, his address easy, polite, and insinuating. By his merit he had acquired the unlimited confidence of his general, and was making rapid progress in military rank and reputation. But in the height of his career, flushed with new hopes from the execution of a project the most beneficial to his party that could be devised, he is at once precipitated from the summit of prosperity, sees all the expectations of his ambition[Pg 423] blasted, and himself ruined. The character I have given of him is drawn partly from what I saw of him myself, and partly from information. I am aware that a man of real merit is never seen in so favorable a light as through the medium of adversity. The clouds that surround him are so many shades that set off his good qualities. Misfortune cuts down little vanities, that in prosperous times, serve as so many spots in his virtues; and gives a tone to humanity that makes his worth more amiable.

André was definitely a spy, and his sentence was therefore just; the plot he was involved in threatened dire consequences for America. If he had been an average person, his execution would have likely sparked indifference. But he wasn’t just any person. In a letter written at the time by Colonel Hamilton, who matched this unfortunate Englishman in genius, honesty, and romantic heroism, André's character is described with deep feeling and eloquence. "There was something uniquely captivating about André's character and story. He had a sharp intellect, enhanced by education and travel, and combined that with a distinctive elegance in both mind and manners, along with the advantages of a pleasing appearance. It’s said he had a good eye for the fine arts and had even gained some skill in poetry, music, and painting. His knowledge came across without pretension, enhanced by a humility that is rarely found alongside so many talents and achievements, making you think he had even more depth than was visible. His thoughts were elevated and commanded respect; they had a softness that fostered affection. He spoke well, and his manner was easy, polite, and engaging. His talents earned him the complete trust of his general, and he was quickly ascending in military rank and reputation. But at the peak of his success, filled with new hopes from executing a project that could greatly benefit his side, he suddenly fell from the heights of prosperity, saw all his ambitions dashed, and found himself ruined. The description I provided is based partly on my own observations and partly on what I've learned. I understand that a truly exceptional person is rarely seen in such a positive light as when facing adversity. The challenges surrounding him act as shadows that highlight his positive qualities. Misfortune strips away small vanities that, in better times, serve as blemishes on his virtues; it gives a sense of humanity that makes his worth more endearing."

"His spectators, who enjoy a happier lot, are less prone to detract from it through envy; and are much disposed by compassion to give the credit he deserves, and perhaps even to magnify it."

"His viewers, who are luckier, are less likely to undermine that happiness out of envy; they’re also more inclined to recognize the credit he deserves and maybe even to exaggerate it."

NOTE—No. V. See Page 377

On the first of May, 1781, General Washington commenced a military journal. The following is a brief statement of the situation of the army at that time. "I begin at this epoch, a concise journal of military transactions, &c. I lament not having attempted it from the commencement of the war in aid of my memory: and wish the multiplicity of matter which continually surrounds me, and the embarrassed state of our affairs, which is momentarily calling the attention to perplexities of one kind or another, may not defeat altogether, or so interrupt my present intention and plan, as to render it of little avail.

On May 1, 1781, General Washington began a military journal. Here’s a brief overview of the army's situation at that time: "I’m starting this concise journal of military events now. I regret not having done this from the start of the war to help my memory, and I hope that the endless volume of tasks that constantly surrounds me and the complicated state of our affairs, which keeps pulling my attention to various issues, won't completely derail or disrupt my current plan to the point that it becomes useless."

"To have the clearer understanding of the entries which may follow, it would be proper to recite, in detail, our wants, and our prospects; but this alone would be a work of much time, and great magnitude. It may suffice to give the sum of them, which I shall do in a few words, viz:

"To better understand the entries that may come next, it would be helpful to outline our needs and our goals in detail; however, doing so would take a lot of time and effort. It’s enough to summarize them, which I will do in a few words, namely:"

"Instead of having magazines filled with provisions, we have a scanty pittance scattered here and there in the different states.

"Instead of having magazines full of supplies, we have a meager amount spread thinly across the different states."

"Instead of having our arsenals well supplied with military stores, they are poorly provided, and the workmen all leaving them.—Instead of having the various articles of field equipage in readiness to deliver, the quartermaster general is but now applying to the several states (as the dernier ressort) to provide these things for their troops respectively. Instead of having a regular system of transportation established upon[Pg 424] credit—or funds in the quartermaster's hands to defray the contingent expenses of it—we have neither the one or the other; and all that business, or a great part of it, being done by military impressment, we are daily and hourly oppressing the people, souring their tempers, and alienating their affections. Instead of having the regiments completed to the new establishments (and which ought to have been so by the —— of —— agreeably to the requisitions of congress, scarce any state in the union has, at this hour, one-eighth part of its quota in the field; and there is little prospect that I can see of ever getting more than half. In a word, instead of having every thing in readiness to take the field, we have nothing. And instead of having the prospect of a glorious offensive campaign before us, we have a bewildered and gloomy prospect of a defensive one; unless we should receive a powerful aid of ships, land troops and money from our generous allies: and these at present are too contingent to build upon."

"Instead of having our arsenals well-stocked with military supplies, they are poorly equipped, and the workers are all leaving. Instead of having the various items of field equipment ready for delivery, the quartermaster general is only now asking the states (as a last resort) to supply these things for their troops. Instead of having a regular system for transportation set up on[Pg 424] credit—or funds available with the quartermaster to cover the associated costs—we have neither, and most of that work is being done through military requisition. This is causing us to constantly burden the people, souring their moods and driving them away. Instead of having the regiments filled out according to the new requirements (which should have been done by the —— of Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize. as per Congress's requests), barely any state in the union has even one-eighth of its required troops in the field right now; and I can hardly see any chance of getting more than half. In short, instead of being prepared to take the field, we have nothing. And instead of looking forward to a promising offensive campaign, we face a confusing and grim prospect of a defensive one; unless we get significant support in ships, ground troops, and money from our generous allies, which is currently too uncertain to rely on."

NOTE—No. VI. See Page 405

York in Virginia, 17th October, 1781, half past four, P.M.

York, Virginia, October 17, 1781, 4:30 PM.

Sir,—I have this moment been honoured with your excellency's letter dated this day. The time limited for sending my answer will not admit of entering into the details of articles, but the basis of my proposals will be, that the garrisons of York and Gloucester shall be prisoners of war with the customary honours; and for the convenience of the individuals which I have the honour to command, that the British shall be sent to Britain, and the Germans to Germany, under engagements not to serve against France, America, or their allies, until released or regularly exchanged. That all arms and public stores shall be delivered up to you, but that the usual indulgence of side arms to officers and of retaining private property shall be granted to officers and soldiers; and the interests of individuals in civil capacities, and connected with us, shall be attended to. If your excellency thinks that a continuance of the suspension of hostilities will be necessary to transmit your answer, I shall have no objection to the hour that you propose. I have the honour to be,

Sir,–I just received your excellency's letter dated today. The time for my response doesn’t allow me to go into detail, but the main point of my proposals is that the garrisons of York and Gloucester will be treated as prisoners of war with the usual honors. For the convenience of the individuals I command, the British troops will be sent to Britain, and the Germans to Germany, with agreements not to fight against France, America, or their allies, until they are released or formally exchanged. All arms and public supplies will be handed over to you, but officers will be allowed their side arms, and personal property will be retained by both officers and soldiers. We will also take care of the interests of individuals in civil roles connected with us. If you think it's necessary to keep the ceasefire in place while you prepare your response, I have no issues with whatever timing you suggest. I have the honor to be,

Sir, your most obedient and most humble servant,

Sir, your most loyal and humble servant,

CORNWALLIS.

CORNWALLIS.

His excellency General Washington, &c. &c. [Pg 425]&c.

General Washington, His Excellency, etc. [Pg 425] etc.

NOTE—No. VII. See Page 406

Head quarters before York, 18th October, 1781.

Headquarters before York, October 18, 1781.

My Lord,—To avoid unnecessary discussions and delays, I shall at once, in answer to your lordship's letter of yesterday, declare the general basis upon which a definitive treaty of capitulation must take place. The garrison of York and Gloucester, including the seamen, as you propose, will be received prisoners of war. The condition annexed of sending the British and German troops to the parts of Europe to which they respectively belong, is inadmissible. Instead of this, they will be marched to such parts of the country as can most conveniently provide for their subsistence; and the benevolent treatment of prisoners, which is invariably observed by the Americans, will be extended to them. The same honours will be granted to the surrendering army, as were granted to the garrison of Charleston.

My Lord,—To avoid any unnecessary discussions and delays, I'll respond directly to your letter from yesterday and outline the basic terms for a final treaty of surrender. The garrison of York and Gloucester, along with the sailors, as you suggested, will be taken as prisoners of war. The condition of sending the British and German troops back to their respective parts of Europe is not acceptable. Instead, they will be taken to areas where they can be properly supported. The humane treatment of prisoners, which Americans consistently uphold, will be applied to them. The same honors will be given to the surrendering army as were given to the garrison of Charleston.

The shipping and boats in the two harbours, with all their guns, stores, tackling, furniture, and apparel, shall be delivered in their present state to an officer of the navy appointed to take possession of them.

The ships and boats in the two harbors, along with all their weapons, supplies, gear, equipment, and clothing, will be handed over in their current condition to a navy officer assigned to take control of them.

The artillery, arms, accoutrements, military chest, and public stores of every denomination, shall be delivered unimpaired, to the heads of departments, to which they respectively belong.

The artillery, weapons, gear, military supplies, and public goods of all kinds will be handed over in good condition to the department heads to which they belong.

The officers will be indulged in retaining their side arms, and the officers and soldiers may preserve their baggage and effects with this reserve, that property taken in the country will be reclaimed.

The officers will be allowed to keep their sidearms, and both the officers and soldiers can keep their luggage and belongings with the understanding that any property taken from the country will be returned.

With regard to the individuals in civil capacities, whose interests your lordship wishes may be attended to, until they are more particularly described, nothing definitive can be settled.

With respect to the individuals in civil roles, whose interests your lordship hopes to address, nothing specific can be decided until they are further described.

I have to add, that I expect the sick and wounded will be supplied with their own hospital stores, and attended by British surgeons particularly charged with the care of them.

I want to add that I expect the sick and injured will have their own hospital supplies and be cared for by British surgeons who are specifically assigned to look after them.

Your lordship will be pleased to signify your determination either to accept or reject the proposals now offered, in the course of two hours from the delivery of this letter, that commissioners may be appointed to digest the articles of capitulation, or a renewal of hostilities may take place.

Your lordship will be pleased to indicate your decision to either accept or reject the proposals presented within two hours of receiving this letter, so that commissioners can be appointed to finalize the terms of surrender, or else hostilities may resume.

I have the honour to be, my lord, &c.

I have the honor to be, my lord, &c.

GEORGE WASHINGTON.

GEORGE WASHINGTON.

Lieutenant General Earl Cornwallis.[Pg 426]

Lieutenant General Earl Cornwallis.[Pg 426]

York, in Virginia, 18th October, 1781.

Yorktown, VA, October 18, 1781.

Sir,—I agree to open a treaty of capitulation upon the basis of the garrisons of York and Gloucester, including seamen, being prisoners of war without annexing the condition of their being sent to Europe; but I expect to receive a compensation in arranging the articles of capitulation for the surrender of Gloucester in its present state of defence.

Dude,—I'm willing to start a surrender agreement based on the garrisons of York and Gloucester, including the sailors, being treated as prisoners of war without adding the condition that they be sent to Europe; however, I expect some compensation when we negotiate the terms of surrender for Gloucester in its current state of defense.

I shall in particular desire that the Bonetta sloop of war, may be left entirely at my disposal from the hour the capitulation is signed, to receive an aid-de-camp to carry my despatches to Sir Henry Clinton and such soldiers as I may think proper to send as passengers in her, to be manned with fifty men of her own crew, and to be permitted to sail without examination when my despatches are ready; engaging on my part that the ship shall be brought back and delivered to you, if she escapes the dangers of the sea; that the crew and soldiers sent as passengers shall be accounted for in future exchanges as prisoners; that she shall carry off no officer without your consent, nor public property of any kind; and I shall likewise desire that the traders and inhabitants may preserve their property, and that no person may be punished or molested for having joined the British troops.

I would particularly like the Bonetta sloop of war to be completely at my disposal from the moment the capitulation is signed. It should carry an aide-de-camp to deliver my messages to Sir Henry Clinton and any soldiers I choose to send as passengers. It should be crewed with fifty men from its own crew and allowed to sail without inspection when my messages are ready. I promise that the ship will be returned to you, if it survives the dangers of the sea. The crew and soldiers sent as passengers will be accounted for in future exchanges as prisoners. The ship will not take any officer without your permission or carry any public property of any kind. I also request that the traders and local residents can keep their property and that no one is punished or bothered for having joined the British troops.

If you choose to proceed to negotiation on these grounds, I shall appoint two field officers of my army to meet two officers from you at any time and place you think proper, to digest the articles of capitulation. I have the honour to be, sir,

If you decide to move forward with negotiations on this basis, I will assign two field officers from my army to meet with two of your officers at any time and location you deem appropriate to discuss the terms of surrender. I look forward to your response, sir,

Your most obedient and most humble servant,

Your most loyal and humble servant,

CORNWALLIS.

CORNWALLIS.

His excellency General Washington, &c. &c. &c.

His Excellency General Washington, etc. etc. etc.

NOTE—No. VIII. See Page 411

Head quarters, 20th October, 1781.

Headquarters, October 20, 1781.

Sir,—The surrender of York, from which so much glory and advantage are derived to the allies, and the honour of which belongs to your excellency, has greatly anticipated our most sanguine expectations. Certain of this event under your auspices, though unable to determine the time, I solicited your excellency's attention in the first conference with which you honoured me, to ulterior objects of decisive importance to the common cause. Although your excellency's answer on that occasion was unfavourable to my wishes, the unexpected[Pg 427] promptness with which our operations have been conducted to their final success having gained us time, the defect of which was one of your excellency's principal objections, a perspective of the most extensive and happy consequences, engages me to renew my representations.

Sir,—The surrender of York, which brings so much glory and benefit to our allies, and the honor of which goes to you, has exceeded our highest expectations. Certain of this outcome under your leadership, even though I couldn't predict the timing, I requested your attention to further crucial matters for our common cause during our first meeting. Although your response then didn't align with my hopes, the unexpected [Pg 427] speed with which our efforts have been carried out to their successful conclusion has given us time, which was one of your main concerns, and the prospect of significant and positive outcomes compels me to bring my points up again.

Charleston, the principal maritime port of the British in the southern parts of the continent, the grand deposite and point of support for the present theatre of the war, is open to a combined attack, and might be carried with as much certainty as the place which has just surrendered.

Charleston, the main maritime port for the British in the southern part of the continent, the major supply point and support for the current war front, is vulnerable to a combined attack and could be captured just as surely as the location that has just surrendered.

This capture would destroy the last hope which induces the enemy to continue the war; for having experienced the impracticability of recovering the populous northern states, he has determined to confine himself to the defensive in that quarter, and to prosecute a most vigorous offensive in the south, with a view of conquering states, whose spare population and natural disadvantages render them infinitely less susceptible of defence; although their productions render them the most valuable in a commercial view. His naval superiority, previous to your excellency's arrival, gave him decisive advantages in the rapid transport of his troops and supplies: while the immense land marches of our succours, too tardy and expensive in every point of view, subjected us to be beaten in detail.

This capture would crush the last hope that keeps the enemy fighting; having realized it's impossible to reclaim the populous northern states, he has decided to focus on defense there and launch a strong offensive in the south, aiming to conquer states that, due to their sparse population and natural disadvantages, are much easier to defend against. However, their resources make them highly valuable from a commercial standpoint. Before your excellency arrived, his naval superiority gave him major advantages in quickly moving his troops and supplies, while our massive land marches of reinforcements were too slow and costly in every way, leaving us vulnerable to being defeated piece by piece.

It will depend upon your excellency, therefore, to terminate the war, and enable the allies to dictate the law in a treaty. A campaign so glorious and so fertile in consequences, could be reserved only for the Count de Grasse.

It will be up to you, Your Excellency, to end the war and allow the allies to set the terms in a treaty. A campaign so glorious and with such significant results could only be entrusted to Count de Grasse.

It rarely happens that such a combination of means, as are in our hands at present, can be seasonably obtained by the most strenuous of human exertions.—A decisively superior fleet, the fortune and talents of whose commander overawe all the naval force that the most incredible efforts of the enemy have been able to collect; an army flushed with success, and demanding only to be conducted to new attacks; and the very season which is proper for operating against the points in question.

It seldom occurs that a combination of resources like the ones we currently have can be gained through the greatest human efforts. We have a clearly superior fleet, and the luck and skills of its commander intimidate all the naval power that the enemy can muster through their most incredible efforts. We also have an army excited by its recent victories, eager to strike again, and the perfect season for launching operations against the targets in question.

If upon entering into the detail of this expedition, your excellency should still determine it impracticable, there is an object which though subordinate to that above mentioned, is of capital importance to our southern operations, and may be effected at infinitely less expense; I mean the enemy's post at Wilmington in North Carolina. Circumstances require[Pg 428] that I should at this period reinforce the southern army under General Greene. This reinforcement transported by sea under your excellency's convoy, would enable us to carry the post in question with very little difficulty, and would wrest from the British a point of support in North Carolina, which is attended with the most dangerous consequences to us, and would liberate another state. This object would require nothing more than the convoy of your excellency to the point of operation, and the protection of the debarkation.

If, after looking into the details of this expedition, your excellency still finds it impractical, there is another objective that, while less important than the previous one, is crucial for our operations in the south and can be accomplished at a much lower cost: taking the enemy's post at Wilmington in North Carolina. Given the circumstances, I need to reinforce the southern army under General Greene at this time. Having this reinforcement transported by sea with your excellency’s convoy would allow us to capture the post in question with very little effort, eliminating a key support point for the British in North Carolina, which poses serious risks for us, and would free up another state. This plan would require nothing more than your excellency's convoy to the operation site and ensuring the safety of the landing.

I intreat your excellency's attention to the points which I have the honour of laying before you, and to be pleased at the same time to inform me what are your dispositions for a maritime force to be left on the American station.

I kindly ask for your attention to the points I’m presenting to you, and I would appreciate it if you could also let me know your plans for a naval force to be stationed in America.

I have the honour to be, &c.

I am honored to be, &c.

GEORGE WASHINGTON.

GEORGE WASHINGTON.

NOTE—No. IX. See Page 413

Late in October an irruption was made into the country on the Mohawk, by Major Ross, at the head of about five hundred men, composed of regulars, rangers, and Indians. Colonel Willet, with between four and five hundred men, partly of the troops denominated levies, and partly militia, immediately marched in quest of them, and fell in with them at Johnstown, where they were slaughtering cattle, apparently unapprehensive of an enemy. Before showing himself, he detached Major Rowley of Massachusetts with the left wing to fall on the rear, while he should engage the front. On his appearance the British party retired to a neighbouring wood, and the American advance was just beginning to skirmish with them, when that whole wing, without any apparent cause, suddenly fled from the field, leaving a field-piece posted on a height in order to cover a retreat, to fall into the hands of the enemy. Fortunately for the party, Rowley appeared in the rear at this critical juncture, and regained what the right wing had lost. Night soon coming on, Major Ross retired further into the wood, and encamped on the top of a mountain. He seems after this skirmish to have been only intent on repassing the dreary wilderness in his rear, and securing his party; an object not to be accomplished without immense fatigue and great suffering, as Colonel Willet had cut off their return to their boats, and they were to retreat by the way of Buck island, or Oswe[Pg 429]gatchie. With a select part of his troops who were furnished with five days provisions, and about sixty Indians who had just joined him, and who, he said, "are the best cavalry for the service of the wilderness," he commenced a rapid pursuit, and in the morning of the 30th, at a ford on Canada creek, fell in with about forty whites and some Indians who were left in the rear to procure provisions. These were attacked and the greater number of them killed or taken, upon which the main body fled with such rapidity that the pursuit proved ineffectual. In the party at Canada creek was Major Walter Butler, the person who perpetrated the massacre at Cherry-valley. His entreaties for quarter were disregarded, and he fell the victim of that vengeance which his own savage temper had directed against himself.

Late in October, Major Ross led an attack into the country on the Mohawk with about five hundred men, made up of regulars, rangers, and Indians. Colonel Willet, commanding around four to five hundred men, partly made up of levies and partly militia, quickly marched to find them and encountered them at Johnstown, where they were killing cattle, seemingly unaware of any enemies nearby. Before revealing himself, he sent Major Rowley of Massachusetts with the left wing to flank them from behind while he engaged them from the front. When he showed up, the British party retreated into a nearby forest, and just as the American forces began to skirmish, the entire right wing unexpectedly fled the field, abandoning a field cannon positioned on a hill to cover their retreat, which fell into enemy hands. Fortunately, at this critical moment, Rowley appeared from the rear and recovered what the right wing had lost. As night fell, Major Ross retreated deeper into the woods and set up camp on top of a mountain. After this skirmish, he seemed focused only on making his way back through the harsh wilderness behind him and keeping his men safe—objectives that wouldn't be achieved without immense effort and suffering, since Colonel Willet had cut off their route back to their boats, forcing them to retreat via Buck Island or Oswe[Pg 429]gatchie. With a select group of his troops who had five days' worth of supplies and about sixty newly joined Indians, whom he described as "the best cavalry for wilderness service," he began a quick pursuit. On the morning of the 30th, at a crossing on Canada Creek, he encountered about forty white men and some Indians who had been left behind to gather provisions. They were attacked, and most were either killed or captured, causing the main group to flee so quickly that the pursuit was unsuccessful. Among those at Canada Creek was Major Walter Butler, the person responsible for the massacre at Cherry Valley. His pleas for mercy went unheard, and he became the target of the vengeance that his own savage nature had stirred against him.

END OF VOLUME III.


FOOTNOTES

[1] See note No. I. at the end of the volume.

[1] See note No. I. at the end of the book.

[2] General Wilkinson, in his memoirs, says that this notice was given by a person formerly a lieutenant in Proctor's regiment of artillery, who, disgusted at being discarded from the American service, became a spy to Sir William Howe; and, the better to fulfil his new engagements, kept up his acquaintance with his former comrades, and frequently visited the camp at Valley Forge. To avoid the suspicion which would be excited by his going into Philadelphia, a rendezvous had been established on Frankford Creek, where he met a messenger from General Howe, to whom his communications were delivered. This statement is certainly correct.

[2] General Wilkinson, in his memoirs, states that this information was provided by a former lieutenant in Proctor's artillery regiment. Disappointed after being dismissed from the American army, he became a spy for Sir William Howe. To fulfill his new role, he maintained contact with his former comrades and often visited the camp at Valley Forge. To avoid raising suspicion by going directly into Philadelphia, a meeting point was set up at Frankford Creek, where he met a messenger from General Howe to pass on his reports. This account is definitely accurate.

[3] Extracts of letters from the adjutant general and the officer of the day to Captain M'Clane.

[3] Excerpts from letters from the adjutant general and the officer of the day to Captain M'Clane.

Camp Valley Forge, May 21st, 1778.

Camp Valley Forge, May 21, 1778.

Dear Captain,—I am happy you have with your brave little party conducted with so much honour to yourself. The Marquis effected, owing to your vigilance, a glorious retreat as well as a difficult one.

Dear Captain, — I’m glad that you and your brave little team have conducted yourselves with such honor. Because of your vigilance, the Marquis managed to achieve a glorious and challenging retreat.

Signed Alex. Scammell, Adj. Gen.

Signed Alex. Scammell, Adj. Gen.

Camp Valley Forge, May 23d, 1778.

Camp Valley Forge, May 23, 1778.

Dear Captain,—I am pleased to hear you are still doing something to distinguish yourself in the eyes of your country. I have the pleasure to inform you that your conduct with the Marquis has been very pleasing to his Excellency and the whole army.

Dear Captain,—I’m glad to hear you’re still making an effort to stand out in the eyes of your country. I’m pleased to let you know that your behavior with the Marquis has been very well received by his Excellency and everyone in the army.

I am your obedient servant,

I am your loyal servant,

Charles Scott, Brig. Gen. and officer of the day.

Charles Scott, Brig. Gen. and officer on duty.

[4] The danger with which this detachment was threatened, was perceived from the camp at Valley Forge, soon after it had been communicated to Lafayette. Alarm-guns were fired to announce it to him, and the whole army was put under arms, to act as circumstances might require. It has been erroneously stated that General Washington was unapprised of this movement of the British army until its object was defeated. The author was in camp at the time, saw the Commander-in-chief, accompanied by his aids and some of the general officers ride, soon after sun-rise, to the summit of the hill on the side of which the huts were constructed, and look anxiously towards the scene of action through a glass. He witnessed too the joy with which they returned after the detachment had crossed the Schuylkill.

[4] The threat to this detachment was noticed from the camp at Valley Forge soon after it was reported to Lafayette. Alarm-guns were fired to alert him, and the entire army was mobilized to respond as needed. It's wrongly claimed that General Washington was unaware of the British army's movement until its goal was thwarted. The author was in camp at the time and saw the Commander-in-chief, along with his aides and some of the general officers, ride to the top of the hill where the huts were built right after sunrise, looking anxiously toward the battlefield through a telescope. He also witnessed their relief when they returned after the detachment had crossed the Schuylkill.

[5] It has been said that his troops were excessively fatigued by a march of upwards of twenty miles, and that he waited, confident that the Marquis could not escape him, for information that Gray had reached his position.

[5] It's been said that his troops were extremely tired after marching over twenty miles, and that he waited, sure that the Marquis couldn't get away from him, for news that Gray had arrived at his position.

[6] As the British army moved down Second street, Captain M'Lane, with a few light horse and one hundred infantry, entered the city, and cut off, and captured one Captain, one Provost Marshal, one guide to the army, and thirty privates, without losing a man.

[6] As the British army advanced down Second Street, Captain M'Lane, along with a handful of light cavalry and one hundred infantry, entered the city, intercepting and capturing one captain, one provost marshal, one army guide, and thirty privates, all without losing a single man.

[7] Letter of Sir Henry Clinton.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Sir Henry Clinton.

[8] General Lafayette, in a communication made to the author respecting this battle, expresses himself thus: "Never was General Washington greater in war than in this action. His presence stopped the retreat. His dispositions fixed the victory. His fine appearance on horseback, his calm courage, roused by the animation produced by the vexation of the morning, (le depit de la matinée) gave him the air best calculated to excite enthusiasm."

[8] General Lafayette, in a message to the author about this battle, said: "General Washington was never greater in war than in this action. His presence halted the retreat. His strategy secured the victory. His impressive appearance on horseback, his calm bravery, fired up by the frustration of the morning, gave him the vibe that inspired enthusiasm."

[9] Alluding, it is presumed, to the delicacy of suggesting to General Sullivan the mischief to be apprehended from any intemperate expressions.

[9] It is thought that this refers to the sensitivity of hinting to General Sullivan about the potential problems that could arise from any reckless remarks.

[10] The offensive words were "insidious interposition of a power which has, from the first settlement of the colonies, been actuated with enmity to us both; and notwithstanding the pretended date or present form of the French offers."

[10] The hurtful words were "the sneaky interference of a power that has, since the very beginning of the colonies, been driven by hostility towards us both; and despite the claimed timing or current shape of the French offers."

[11] Some expressions having been used in the letter, respecting the convention troops, which were deemed disrespectful, no other reply was made to it than that "congress gave no answer to insolent letters."

[11] Some phrases in the letter regarding the convention troops were considered disrespectful, so the only response was that "Congress doesn't reply to rude letters."

[12] The author has been favoured by his estimable friend, Major General Scott, with the perusal of an introduction written by Mr. L. De Sevelinges, to Botta's "History of the war of the independence of the United States of America," translated into French.

[12] The author has been fortunate to receive from his esteemed friend, Major General Scott, a chance to read an introduction written by Mr. L. De Sevelinges to Botta's "History of the War of Independence of the United States of America," which has been translated into French.

Mr. De Sevelinges professes to have received the most precious explanations, relative to incidents and motives, from a gentleman equally distinguished for his knowledge and his character, whose situation enabled him to become acquainted with facts which were concealed from the public. Speaking of the attempt made by Mr. Johnson, he says, p. 19, it was essential "to break off all communication with the agents of the British minister. Mr. Girard directed all his efforts to this object, and had the good fortune to effect it.

Mr. De Sevelinges claims to have received invaluable insights about events and motivations from a gentleman known for both his knowledge and integrity, whose position allowed him to learn about facts hidden from the public. Commenting on the attempt made by Mr. Johnson, he states, p. 19, it was crucial "to cut off all contact with the agents of the British minister. Mr. Girard focused all his efforts on this goal and was fortunate enough to achieve it.

"But the English faction of tories subsisted. It was powerful from the credit of its chiefs."

"But the English faction of Tories continued to exist. It was strong because of the reputation of its leaders."

In a note on this passage, he says, "The most influential were Samuel Adams and Richard Lee, (Richard H. Lee,) the brother of Arthur Lee, one of the deputies of congress in France. He was convicted of having secret intelligence with the British minister."

In a note on this passage, he says, "The most influential were Samuel Adams and Richard Lee, (Richard H. Lee,) the brother of Arthur Lee, one of the congress delegates in France. He was found guilty of having secret communications with the British minister."

It would be injustice to the memoirs of these distinguished patriots to attempt their vindication against this atrocious and unfounded calumny. A calumny supported by no testimony, nor by a single circumstance wearing even the semblance of probability, and confuted by the whole tenour of their lives. The annals of the American revolution do not furnish two names more entirely above suspicion than Samuel Adams and Richard Henry Lee. With the first gentleman the author was not personally acquainted. With the last he was; and can appeal with confidence to every man who knew him, to declare the conviction, that he died as he lived, a pure and devoted, as well as enlightened friend of American independence. The same character was maintained by Mr. Adams.

It would be unfair to the stories of these distinguished patriots to try to defend them against this terrible and baseless slander. This slander has no evidence to support it, nor does it have even a single detail that appears plausible, and it is contradicted by their entire way of life. The history of the American Revolution does not provide two names more completely free from suspicion than Samuel Adams and Richard Henry Lee. The author did not know the first gentleman personally, but he did know the latter and can confidently appeal to everyone who knew him to affirm that he died as he lived—a pure, dedicated, and enlightened supporter of American independence. Mr. Adams maintained the same reputation.

In casting about for the foundation of this calumny, the author is inclined to look for it in the opinions entertained by these gentlemen, on subjects connected with the negotiations for peace.

In searching for the source of this false accusation, the author tends to find it in the views held by these gentlemen regarding issues related to the peace negotiations.

Since the publication of the secret journals of congress, it is generally known that France countenanced the claim of Spain to circumscribe the western boundary of the United States, by the line prescribed in the royal proclamation of 1763, for settlement of vacant lands. After Great Britain had consented to acknowledge the independence of the United States, it was understood by those who were acquainted with the views of the belligerents, that a disposition existed on the part of France and Spain, to continue the war for objects in which the United States felt no interest,—among others, for Gibraltar and Jamaica. Some American statesmen, and the Lees were of the number, probably Mr. Adams also, were extremely apprehensive that the miseries of their country would be prolonged for these objects. It is not impossible that the sentiments of these gentlemen on these subjects, being in opposition to the views of France, might, though founded entirely in American policy, be attributed to British intrigues.

Since the secret journals of Congress were published, it's widely known that France supported Spain's claim to limit the western boundary of the United States to the line set in the royal proclamation of 1763 for settling vacant lands. After Great Britain agreed to recognize the independence of the United States, those familiar with the intentions of the warring parties understood that both France and Spain wanted to continue the conflict for reasons that the United States had no interest in—such as Gibraltar and Jamaica. Some American leaders, including the Lees and probably Mr. Adams, were very worried that their country's suffering would continue over these issues. It's possible that these gentlemen's views on the matter, which contradicted those of France, might be seen as influenced by British schemes, even though they were based solely on American interests.

[13] This gentleman is stated not to have been of the same family with the leader of the invading army.

[13] It is reported that this man was not related to the leader of the invading army.

[14] The representation of this battle, and of the circumstances attending the destruction of the Wyoming settlement, have been materially varied from the statement made of them in the first edition. The papers of General Washington furnished allusions to the transaction, but no particular account of it. The author therefore relied on Mr. Gordon and Mr. Ramsay, whose authority was quoted. Soon after the work was published, he received a letter from a gentleman then residing in that country, (Mr. Charles Miner,) who asserted with confidence that the statement was incorrect, and gave himself a minute detail of events, collected from persons who were in the settlement at the time, and witnessed them.

[14] The description of this battle and the events leading to the destruction of the Wyoming settlement have changed significantly from what was said in the first edition. General Washington's papers mentioned the event, but did not provide specific details. The author therefore relied on Mr. Gordon and Mr. Ramsay, whose credibility was cited. Shortly after the work was published, he received a letter from a gentleman living in that area, Mr. Charles Miner, who confidently claimed that the information was incorrect and provided a detailed account of events, gathered from people who were present in the settlement at the time and witnessed them.

The author has been since indebted to the same gentleman for a statement of the battle, and of the events which followed it, drawn up by one of the descendants of Colonel Zebulon Butler, to which the certificates of several gentlemen are annexed, who were engaged in the action. These documents, with one which will be mentioned, convince him that the combined treachery and savage ferocity which have been painted in such vivid colours, in the narratives that have been given of this furious and desolating irruption, have been greatly exaggerated. Historic truth demands that these misstatements should be corrected.

The author has been indebted to the same gentleman for a report on the battle and the events that followed, prepared by a descendant of Colonel Zebulon Butler. Attached to it are certificates from several men who were involved in the action. These documents, along with another one that will be mentioned, convince him that the combined treachery and brutal savagery depicted in such vivid detail in the accounts of this furious and devastating incursion have been greatly exaggerated. Historic truth requires that these inaccuracies be corrected.

The other document alluded to, is a letter from Zebulon Butler to the board of war, making his report of the transaction. The letter has been lately found among his papers, and is copied below.

The other document mentioned is a letter from Zebulon Butler to the board of war, reporting on the event. This letter was recently discovered among his papers and is copied below.

Grandenhutten, Penn Township, July 10th, 1778.

Grandenhutten, Penn Township, July 10, 1778.

Honoured Sir,—On my arrival at Westmoreland, (which was only four days after I left Yorktown,) I found there was a large body of the enemy advancing on that settlement. On the first of July we mustered the militia, and marched towards them by the river above the settlement,—found and killed two Indians at a place where the day before they had murdered nine men engaged in hoeing corn. We found some canoes, &c. but finding we were above their main body, it was judged prudent to return. And as every man had to go to his own house for his provision, we could not muster again till the 3d of July. In the mean time, the enemy had got possession of two forts, one of which we had reason to believe was designed for them, though they burnt them both. The inhabitants had seven forts for the security of their women and children, extending about ten miles on the river, and too many men would stay in them to take care of them; but after collecting about three hundred of the most spirited of them, including Captain Hewitt's company, I held a council with the officers, who were all agreed that it was best to attack the enemy before they got any farther. We accordingly marched,—found their situation,—formed a front of the same extension of the enemy's, and attacked from right to left at the same time. Our men stood the fire well for three or four shots, till some part of the enemy gave way; but unfortunately for us, through some mistake, the word retreat was understood from some officer on the left, which took so quick that it was not in the power of the officers to form them again, though I believe, if they had stood three minutes longer, the enemy would have been beaten. The utmost pains were taken by the officers, who mostly fell. A lieutenant colonel, a major and five captains, who were in commission in the militia, all fell. Colonel Durkee, and Captains Hewitt and Ransom were likewise killed. In the whole, about two hundred men lost their lives in the action on our side. What number of the enemy were killed is yet uncertain, though I believe a very considerable number. The loss of these men so intimidated the inhabitants, that they gave up the matter of fighting. Great numbers ran off, and others would comply with the terms that I had refused. The enemy sent flags frequently—the terms you will see in the enclosed letter. They repeatedly said they had nothing to do with any but the inhabitants, and did not want to treat with me. Colonel Dennison, by desire of the inhabitants, went and complied,—which made it necessary for me and the little remains of Captain Hewitt's company to leave the place. Indeed it was determined by the enemy to spare the inhabitants after their agreement, and that myself and the few continental soldiers should be delivered up to the savages. Upon which I left the place, and came scarcely able to move, as I have had no rest since I left Yorktown. It has not been in my power to find a horse or man to wait on the board till now. I must submit to the board what must be the next step. The little remains of Hewitt's company (which are about fifteen) are gone to Shamoken, and Captain Spalding's company, I have heard, are on the Delaware. Several hundred of the inhabitants are strolling in the country destitute of provisions, who have large fields of grain and other necessaries of life at Westmoreland. In short, if the inhabitants can go back, there may yet be saved double the quantity of provisions to support themselves, otherwise they must be beggars, and a burthen to the world.

Honored Sir,—When I arrived in Westmoreland, just four days after leaving Yorktown, I discovered a large group of the enemy advancing on that settlement. On July 1st, we gathered the militia and marched toward them along the river above the settlement. We found and killed two Indians at a site where, the day before, they had murdered nine men who were hoeing corn. We came across some canoes and other items, but realizing we were above their main force, it was deemed wise to turn back. Since each man had to return home for supplies, we couldn't regroup until July 3rd. Meanwhile, the enemy had taken control of two forts, one of which we suspected was intended for them, although they burned both. The locals had seven forts to protect their women and children, spanning about ten miles along the river, and too many men stayed in them to take care of their families. However, after gathering about three hundred of the more spirited individuals, including Captain Hewitt's company, I held a council with the officers, who unanimously agreed it was best to confront the enemy before they advanced further. We marched accordingly, assessed their position, aligned ourselves with the enemy’s front, and attacked from right to left simultaneously. Our troops held their ground for three or four shots until some of the enemy began to retreat; unfortunately, due to a misunderstanding, the command to retreat was mistakenly relayed from an officer on the left, and the confusion was so rapid that the officers couldn’t regroup the men. I believe, if we had held on for just three more minutes, we would have defeated the enemy. The officers exerted themselves to the utmost, many of whom died in the process. A lieutenant colonel, a major, and five captains in the militia all fell. Colonel Durkee, as well as Captains Hewitt and Ransom, were also killed. In total, about two hundred men lost their lives in our forces. The exact number of enemy casualties is still unknown, but I suspect it was quite significant. The loss of these men so terrified the locals that they gave up the fight. Many fled, and others accepted terms I had previously rejected. The enemy frequently sent flags; you can see their terms in the enclosed letter. They repeatedly stated that they were only interested in the locals and did not wish to negotiate with me. By the locals' request, Colonel Dennison went and complied, which forced me and the remaining soldiers from Captain Hewitt's company to leave the area. The enemy had decided to spare the local inhabitants after their agreement while planning to turn me and the few remaining Continental soldiers over to the savages. Consequently, I left the place, barely able to move, having had no rest since leaving Yorktown. I’ve been unable to find a horse or anyone to assist me until now. I must report to the board about what the next step should be. The few remaining members of Hewitt's company (about fifteen) have gone to Shamoken, and I’ve heard that Captain Spalding's company is on the Delaware. Several hundred of the locals are wandering the countryside without food while they have large fields of grain and other essentials back in Westmoreland. In short, if the locals can return, they might still recover enough provisions to sustain themselves; otherwise, they'll become beggars and a burden to society.

I have heard from men that came from the place since the people gave up, that the Indians have killed no person since, but have burnt most of the buildings, and are collecting all the horses they can, and are moving up the river. They likewise say the enemy were eight hundred, one-half white men. I should be glad that, if possible, there might be a sufficient guard sent for the defence of the place, which will be the means of saving thousands from poverty—but must submit to the wisdom of congress. I desire farther orders from the honourable board of war with respect to myself, and the soldiers under my direction.

I’ve heard from people who came from there since everyone gave up that the Native Americans haven’t killed anyone since, but they’ve burned most of the buildings and are rounding up all the horses they can and moving up the river. They also say the enemy numbered eight hundred, with half of them being white men. I would be glad if, possible, a sufficient guard could be sent for the protection of the area, which would help save thousands from poverty—but I must defer to Congress’s judgment. I’m requesting further orders from the honorable Board of War regarding my situation and the soldiers I oversee.

I have the honour to be

I’m honored to be

Your Honour's most obedient, humble servant,

Your Honor's most respectful and humble servant,

Zebulon Butler.

Zebulon Butler

[15] See note No. II. at the end of the volume.

[15] Check note No. II. at the end of the book.

[16] So early as January, 1776, congress had recommended the reduction of St. Augustine to the southern colonies.—Secret Journals of Congress, page 38.

[16] As early as January 1776, Congress suggested that St. Augustine be handed over to the southern colonies.—Secret Journals of Congress, page 38.

[17] Ramsay.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Ramsay.

[18] The author was in the covering party, visited the fort next day, and conversed with the officers who had been engaged in storming the works.

[18] The author was part of the cover team, visited the fort the next day, and talked with the officers who had been involved in storming the defenses.

[19] The author states these facts from his own observation, and conversations with other officers of the detachment.

[19] The author shares these details based on his own observations and discussions with other officers in the unit.

[20] While Sullivan was preparing to invade their country, the savages were not inactive. At the head of a small party of whites and Indians, Joseph Brandt fell upon the frontiers of New York, murdered several of the inhabitants, carried others into captivity, and burnt several houses. He was pursued by about one hundred and fifty militia, whom he drew into an ambuscade, and entirely defeated. A few days afterwards, Captain M'Donald, at the head of a small party, of whom a third were British, took a fort on the west branch of the Susquehanna, and made the garrison, amounting to thirty men, prisoners of war. The women and children, contrary to the usage of Indians, were permitted to retire into the settled country.—Gordon.

[20] While Sullivan was getting ready to invade their territory, the natives weren’t just sitting around. Leading a small group of whites and Native Americans, Joseph Brandt attacked the frontiers of New York, killing several residents, capturing others, and burning down multiple houses. He was chased by about one hundred and fifty militia, whom he lured into an ambush and completely defeated. A few days later, Captain M'Donald, leading a small party with a third of them being British, captured a fort on the west branch of the Susquehanna and took the garrison of thirty men as prisoners of war. In a break from typical Indian customs, the women and children were allowed to leave for the settled region.—Gordon.

[21] The author has seen notes taken by a member of congress, of communications made by Mr. Girard, when admitted to an audience, which avow these sentiments. The secret journals of congress sustain this statement.

[21] The author has seen notes taken by a congress member of the communications made by Mr. Girard during a meeting, which express these views. The secret journals of Congress support this statement.

[22] After the fleet passed the fort, Colonel Pinckney and a part of the garrison were withdrawn.

[22] After the fleet went past the fort, Colonel Pinckney and some of the troops were pulled back.

[23] Colonel Parker and Captain Peyton, two valuable officers from Virginia, fell in this manner.

[23] Colonel Parker and Captain Peyton, two important officers from Virginia, died in this way.

[24] Lieutenant Bowyer, an American officer who was in the engagement, near the person of Colonel Buford, in a letter which the author has lately seen, states this affair in a manner not much conflicting with the statement made of it by Colonel Tarlton.

[24] Lieutenant Bowyer, an American officer who was involved in the battle near Colonel Buford, mentions this incident in a letter that the author has recently come across. His account aligns closely with the description given by Colonel Tarlton.

[25] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[26] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[27] This appointment was made without consulting the Commander-in-chief. He had determined, if consulted, to recommend General Greene.

[27] This appointment was made without getting input from the Commander-in-chief. If he had been consulted, he would have recommended General Greene.

[28] This valuable officer was pressing forward to Charleston when that place surrendered. Continuing to advance, he was within one day's march of Colonel Buford, when that officer was defeated. Colonel Porterfield still remained on the frontiers of the Carolinas; and had the address not only to avoid the fate of every other corps sent to the relief of Charleston, but to subsist his men; and keep up the semblance of holding that part of South Carolina.

[28] This important officer was moving towards Charleston when the city surrendered. He kept advancing and was just a day’s march away from Colonel Buford when Buford's forces were defeated. Colonel Porterfield was still stationed on the frontiers of the Carolinas and managed not only to escape the fate of every other unit sent to help Charleston but also to provide for his men and maintain the appearance of control in that part of South Carolina.

[29] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[30] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[31] Colonel Williams says these orders were not executed.

[31] Colonel Williams states that these orders were not carried out.

[32] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[33] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[34] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[35] Journal of Colonel Williams.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Colonel Williams' Journal.

[36] In some instances, the civil power of the state in which such soldiers happened to be, attempted to interfere and to discharge even those belonging to the lines of other states, who asserted their right to be discharged. It was with some difficulty the general could arrest this dangerous interposition.

[36] In some cases, the local government where these soldiers were stationed tried to step in and discharge even those who were part of other states, claiming their right to be released. The general had a hard time stopping this risky interference.

[37] This circumstance would scarcely have deserved notice had it not been accompanied by one of those melancholy events, which even war does not authorize, and which made, at the time, a very deep impression.

[37] This situation probably wouldn't have caught attention if it hadn't been linked to one of those sad events that even war can't justify, and that left a strong impact at the time.

Mrs. Caldwell, the wife of the clergyman of the village, had been induced to remain in her house, under the persuasion that her presence might protect it from pillage, and that her person could not be endangered, as Colonel Dayton who commanded the militia determined not to stop in the settlement. While sitting in the midst of her children, with a sucking infant in her arms, a soldier came up to the window and discharged his musket at her. She received the ball in her bosom, and instantly expired.

Mrs. Caldwell, the wife of the village clergyman, had been persuaded to stay in her home, believing that her presence might keep it safe from looting and that she wouldn’t be in danger, since Colonel Dayton, who led the militia, had decided not to stay in the settlement. While she was sitting with her children, holding a baby in her arms, a soldier approached the window and fired his musket at her. She was shot in the chest and died instantly.

[38] After he had visited the ministers, an arrest of eight days, during which he resided with his relation the Marshal de Noailles, was imposed on him for the sake of form and in honour of the royal authority, which he had disregarded by proceeding to America. After the expiration of this term he presented himself to the King, who graciously said he pardoned his disobedience, in consideration of his good conduct and of his services.—Letter from Gen. Lafayette.

[38] After visiting the ministers, he was put under house arrest for eight days, during which he stayed with his relative, Marshal de Noailles. This was done as a formality and out of respect for the royal authority, which he had ignored by going to America. Once that period was over, he met with the King, who kindly stated that he forgave his disobedience due to his good behavior and his contributions.—Letter from Gen. Lafayette.

[39] See note No. III. at the end of the volume.

[39] See note No. III. at the end of the book.

[40] This instance of patriotism on the part of our fair and amiable countrywomen, is far from being single. Their conduct throughout the war was uniform. They shared with cheerfulness and gaiety, the privations and sufferings to which the distress of the times exposed their country. In every stage of this severe trial, they displayed virtues which have not been always attributed to their sex, but which it is believed they will, on every occasion calculated to unfold them, be found to possess. With a ready acquiescence, with a firmness always cheerful, and a constancy never lamenting the sacrifices which were made, they not only yielded up all the elegancies, delicacies, and even conveniences to be furnished by wealth and commerce, relying on their farms and on domestic industry for every article of food and raiment, but, consenting to share the produce of their own labour, they gave up without regret, a considerable portion of the covering designed for their own families, to supply the wants of the distressed soldiers; and heroically suppressed the involuntary sigh which the departure of their brothers, their sons, and their husbands, for the camp, rended from their bosoms.

[40] This example of patriotism from our kind and friendly women is not isolated. Their actions throughout the war were consistent. They faced the hardships and suffering brought on by the troubled times with joy and positivity. In every phase of this tough challenge, they showed qualities that haven't always been recognized in women, yet it's believed that they will always reveal these traits when the situation demands it. With willing acceptance, cheerful determination, and a steadfastness that never complained about the sacrifices made, they not only gave up all the luxuries, comforts, and even necessities provided by wealth and trade, relying instead on their farms and home industries for food and clothing, but also willingly shared the fruits of their labor. They gave up, without regret, a significant portion of the garments intended for their own families to support the needs of the suffering soldiers, and bravely suppressed the involuntary sigh that escaped them with the departure of their brothers, sons, and husbands to the battlefield.

[41] These orders were given at the instance of General Lafayette.—Correspondence with General Lafayette.

[41] These orders were issued at the request of General Lafayette.—Correspondence with General Lafayette.

[42] The author is informed by General Lafayette that Arnold, while commanding at West Point, endeavoured to obtain from General Washington the names of his secret emissaries in New York, and his means of communicating with them. He pressed Lafayette, who had also his private intelligencers, for the same information. His applications were of course unsuccessful. It cannot be doubted that his object was to commit the additional crime of betraying them to Sir Henry Clinton.

[42] The author learns from General Lafayette that Arnold, while in charge at West Point, tried to get General Washington to share the names of his secret agents in New York and how he contacted them. He also urged Lafayette, who had his own informants, for the same information. Naturally, his requests were unsuccessful. It's clear that his goal was to add the crime of betraying them to Sir Henry Clinton.

[43] Mr. Johnson says he did produce it; but that, on being surprised, he had thrust a paper containing a plan of the route in his boot, which, having been perceived, was demanded, and led to his discovery.

[43] Mr. Johnson claims he did make it; however, when caught off guard, he quickly stuffed a paper with the route plan into his boot, which, after being noticed, was requested and resulted in his exposure.

[44] General Lafayette adds some circumstances which are not found among the manuscript papers of General Washington. The Commander-in-chief with Generals Lafayette and Knox had turned from the direct route in order to visit a redoubt. Colonels Hamilton and M'Henry, the aids-de-camp of Generals Washington and Lafayette, went forward to request Mrs. Arnold not to wait breakfast. Arnold received André's billet in their presence. He turned pale, left them suddenly, called his wife, communicated the intelligence to her and left her in a swoon, without the knowledge of Hamilton and M'Henry. Mounting the horse of his aid-de-camp, which was ready saddled, and directing him to inform General Washington on his arrival that Arnold was gone to receive him at West Point, he gained the river shore, and was conveyed in a canoe to the Vulture.

[44] General Lafayette includes some details that aren't found in General Washington's manuscript papers. The Commander-in-Chief, along with Generals Lafayette and Knox, had taken a detour to visit a redoubt. Colonels Hamilton and M'Henry, the aides-de-camp for Generals Washington and Lafayette, went ahead to ask Mrs. Arnold not to wait for breakfast. Arnold received André's note in front of them. He turned pale, abruptly left them, called his wife, shared the news with her, and left her fainting, all without Hamilton and M'Henry knowing. He hopped onto his aide-de-camp's horse, which was already saddled, and instructed him to tell General Washington, upon arrival, that Arnold had gone to meet him at West Point. He reached the riverbank and was transported by canoe to the Vulture.

The Commander-in-chief, on his arrival, was informed that Arnold awaited him at West Point. Taking it for granted that this step had been taken to prepare for his reception, he proceeded thither without entering the house, and was surprised to find that Arnold was not arrived. On returning to the quarters of that officer he received Jameson's despatch, which disclosed the whole mystery.

The Commander-in-chief, upon his arrival, was told that Arnold was waiting for him at West Point. Assuming this move was made to get ready for his welcome, he went there without going inside the house, only to be surprised to discover that Arnold hadn’t shown up. When he returned to that officer’s quarters, he received Jameson’s message, which revealed the entire situation.

[45] See note No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[45] Check note No. IV. at the end of the book.

[46] General Lafayette mentions a circumstance not previously known to the author, which serves to illustrate the character of Washington, and to mark the delicacy of his feelings towards even the offending part of that sex which is entitled to all the consolation and protection man can afford it.

[46] General Lafayette talks about a situation that the author didn’t know about before, which highlights Washington's character and shows how sensitive he was toward even the part of that gender that deserves all the comfort and protection that a man can provide.

The night after Arnold's escape, when his letter respecting André was received, the general directed one of his aids to wait on Mrs. Arnold, who was convulsed with grief, and inform her that he had done every thing which depended on him to arrest her husband, but that, not having succeeded, it gave him pleasure to inform her that her husband was safe. It is also honourable to the American character, that during the effervescence of the moment, Mrs. Arnold was permitted to go to Philadelphia, to take possession of her effects, and to proceed to New York under the protection of a flag, without receiving the slightest insult.

The night after Arnold's escape, when they received his letter about André, the general had one of his aides go to see Mrs. Arnold, who was overwhelmed with grief. He told her that he had done everything he could to stop her husband, but since he hadn’t succeeded, he was glad to inform her that her husband was safe. It’s also commendable for the American character that during such a turbulent time, Mrs. Arnold was allowed to go to Philadelphia to collect her belongings and then travel to New York under a flag of truce, without facing any insults.

[47] This allusion is thus explained in a private letter from Colonel Hamilton—"This man (Arnold) is in every sense despicable. In addition to the scene of knavery and prostitution during his command in Philadelphia, which the late seizure of his papers has unfolded, the history of his command at West Point is a history of little as well as great villanies. He practised every dirty act of peculation, and even stooped to connexions with the suttlers to defraud the public."

[47] This reference is explained in a private letter from Colonel Hamilton—"This man (Arnold) is utterly contemptible. Besides the deceitful and corrupt actions during his time in Philadelphia, revealed by the recent discovery of his papers, the record of his leadership at West Point is filled with both minor and major crimes. He engaged in every sleazy act of embezzlement and even resorted to connections with the suppliers to cheat the public."

[48] Their names were John Paulding, David Williams, and Isaac Vanwert.

[48] Their names were John Paulding, David Williams, and Isaac Vanwert.

[49] The following extract from a private letter of General Washington to a member of congress, shows how sensible he was of the mischief produced by this temper. "The satisfaction I have in any successes that attend us, even in the alleviation of misfortunes, is always allayed by the fear that it will lull us into security. Supineness, and a disposition to flatter ourselves, seem to make parts of our national character. When we receive a check and are not quite undone, we are apt to fancy we have gained a victory; and when we do gain any little advantage, we imagine it decisive, and expect the war immediately to end. The history of the war is a history of false hopes and temporary expedients. Would to God they were to end here! This winter, if I am not mistaken, will open a still more embarrassing scene than we have yet experienced, to the southward. I have little doubt, should we not gain a naval superiority, that Sir Henry Clinton will detach to the southward to extend his conquests. I am far from being satisfied that we shall be prepared to repel his attempts."

[49] The following excerpt from a private letter of General Washington to a member of Congress shows how aware he was of the troubles caused by this attitude. "The happiness I feel in any successes we have, even in improving our misfortunes, is always dampened by the worry that it will make us too comfortable. Laziness and a tendency to deceive ourselves seem to be parts of our national character. When we face a setback and aren’t completely defeated, we tend to think we’ve won a victory; and when we do achieve any small gain, we believe it’s decisive and expect the war to end right away. The history of this war is filled with false hopes and temporary fixes. If only it would end there! This winter, if I’m not mistaken, will bring an even more complicated situation than we’ve faced so far in the south. I’m not confident that we’ll be ready to fend off his attempts if we don’t gain naval superiority, and I have little doubt that Sir Henry Clinton will move south to expand his conquests."

[50] Rem.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Reminder.

[51] Sted.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Sted.

[52] The details of this battle are chiefly taken from a paper signed by Colonels Campbell, Shelby, and Cleveland, and published in the Virginia Gazette of the 18th of November, 1780.

[52] The details of this battle mainly come from a document signed by Colonels Campbell, Shelby, and Cleveland, which was published in the Virginia Gazette on November 18, 1780.

[53] The author received this account both from General Morgan and Colonel Washington.

[53] The author got this information from both General Morgan and Colonel Washington.

[54] Letter of Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

[55] Letter of Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

[56] These reasons for his conduct were given to the author by General Morgan soon after his return from the southern campaign.

[56] General Morgan shared these reasons for his actions with the author shortly after returning from the southern campaign.

[57] Some of them formed afterwards, and renewed the action on Howard's right.

[57] Some of them later regrouped and continued the action on Howard's right.

[58] In the eagerness of pursuit, Washington advanced near thirty yards in front of his regiment. Three British officers, observing this, wheeled about, and made a charge upon him. The officer on his right aimed a blow to cut him down as an American sergeant came up, who intercepted the blow by disabling his sword arm. The officer on his left was about to make a stroke at him at the same instant, when a waiter, too small to wield a sword, saved him by wounding the officer with a ball from a pistol. At this moment, the officer in the centre, who was believed to be Tarlton, made a thrust at him which he parried; upon which the officer retreated a few paces, and then discharged a pistol at him, which wounded his horse.

[58] In his eagerness to pursue, Washington moved about thirty yards in front of his regiment. Three British officers, noticing this, turned around and charged at him. The officer on his right swung his sword to strike him down just as an American sergeant arrived and intercepted the blow, injuring the officer's arm. The officer on his left was about to attack at the same moment when a waiter, too small to handle a sword, saved Washington by shooting the officer with a pistol. At that moment, the officer in the center, who was thought to be Tarleton, thrust at him, which Washington blocked. The officer then stepped back a few paces and fired a pistol at him, wounding his horse.

[59] The author has received statements of this action from General Morgan and from Colonels Howard and Washington.

[59] The author has received reports about this action from General Morgan and Colonels Howard and Washington.

[60] The author received this fact from Colonel Carrington.

[60] The author got this information from Colonel Carrington.

[61] The western militia had been engaged in a war with the Cherokee Indians, who, neglected by the United States, and incited by the British, had determined once more to take up the hatchet. The militia from the western parts of Virginia and North Carolina entered their country, burnt their towns, containing near one thousand houses, destroyed fifty thousand bushels of grain, killed twenty-nine men, took several prisoners, and compelled the nation to sue for peace.

[61] The western militia had been fighting a war against the Cherokee Indians, who, feeling overlooked by the United States and stirred up by the British, decided to pick up arms again. The militia from the western regions of Virginia and North Carolina entered their territory, burned their towns, which included nearly one thousand homes, destroyed fifty thousand bushels of grain, killed twenty-nine men, captured several prisoners, and forced the nation to seek peace.

[62] Letter of Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

[63] Letter of Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Lord Cornwallis.—Stedman.

[64] After passing through the guards into the cleared ground, Washington, who always led the van, perceived an officer surrounded by several persons who appeared to be aids-de-camp. Believing this to be Lord Cornwallis, he rushed forward in the hope of making him a prisoner, but was arrested by an accident. His cap fell from his head, and, as he leaped to the ground to recover it, the officer leading the column was shot through the body, and rendered incapable of managing his horse. The animal wheeled round with his rider, and galloped off the field. He was followed by all the cavalry, who supposed that this movement had been directed.

[64] After getting past the guards and onto the clear ground, Washington, who always took the lead, spotted an officer surrounded by several aides. Thinking this was Lord Cornwallis, he dashed forward hoping to capture him, but something unexpected happened. His cap fell off, and as he bent down to pick it up, the officer leading the column was shot and became unable to control his horse. The horse turned around with its rider and bolted off the field. All the cavalry followed, thinking this was a deliberate maneuver.

[65] While the army lay at Westover, Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe, at the head of less than fifty horse, attacked and dispersed a body of militia at Charles City court house, with the loss of only one man killed, and three wounded.

[65] While the army was stationed at Westover, Lieutenant Colonel Simcoe, leading fewer than fifty cavalry, attacked and scattered a group of militia at Charles City courthouse, suffering just one death and three injuries.

[66] The author witnessed this skirmish.

[66] The author saw this fight happen.

[67] Letter of Sir Henry Clinton.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Letter from Sir Henry Clinton.

[68] A slave population must be unfavourable to great and sudden exertions by militia.

[68] A population of enslaved people is not conducive to large and sudden efforts by militias.

[69] Secret journals of Congress, v. 2, pp. 393, 396, 407. This measure was moved by the delegation from Virginia, in consequence of instructions of 2d Jan. 1781. Sec. 10, H. at large, 538.

[69] Secret journals of Congress, v. 2, pp. 393, 396, 407. This action was proposed by the Virginia delegation based on instructions from January 2, 1781. Sec. 10, H. at large, 538.

[70] Secret journals of Congress, v. 2, p. 468.

[70] Secret journals of Congress, v. 2, p. 468.

[71] The secret journals of congress, published under the resolutions of March 27th, 1818, and April 21st, 1820, contain "A History of the Confederation." The course of public opinion on a most important point—the nature of the connexion which ought to be maintained between these United States—may be in some degree perceived in the progress of this instrument, and may not be entirely uninteresting to the American reader.

[71] The secret journals of Congress, published under the resolutions of March 27, 1818, and April 21, 1820, include "A History of the Confederation." The evolution of public opinion on a very important issue—the type of relationship that should exist between these United States—can be somewhat understood by looking at the development of this document, and it may be of interest to the American reader.

So early as July, 1775, Doctor Franklin submitted "Articles of Confederation and perpetual union" to the consideration of congress, which were to continue in force until a reconciliation with Great Britain should take place on the terms demanded by the colonies. Into this confederation, not only all the British colonies on the continent, but Ireland and the West India islands were to be admitted.

So early as July 1775, Doctor Franklin presented "Articles of Confederation and perpetual union" for Congress to consider, which were meant to remain in effect until a reconciliation with Great Britain happened on the terms requested by the colonies. This confederation was to include not only all the British colonies on the continent but also Ireland and the West Indies.

Congress was to consist of members chosen by each colony in proportion to its numbers, and was to sit in each successively. Its powers were to embrace the external relations of the country, the settling of all disputes between the colonies, the planting of new colonies; and were to extend to ordinances on such general subjects as, though necessary to the general welfare, particular assemblies can not be competent to, viz. "Those that may relate to our general commerce, or general currency; the establishment of ports; and the regulation of our common forces."

Congress would consist of members elected by each colony based on its population, and would meet in each colony in turn. Its powers would include managing the country's international relations, resolving disputes between the colonies, and establishing new colonies. Additionally, Congress would handle important issues that, while essential for the general welfare, individual assemblies cannot effectively manage, such as matters related to overall trade or currency, setting up ports, and regulating our shared military forces.

The executive was to consist of a council of twelve, selected by congress from its own body, one-third of whom were to be changed annually.

The executive would be made up of a council of twelve, chosen by Congress from its own members, with one-third being replaced each year.

Amendments were to be proposed by congress; and, when approved by a majority of the colonial assemblies, were to become a part of the constitution.

Amendments were to be suggested by Congress; and, once they were approved by a majority of the colonial assemblies, they would become a part of the constitution.

In June, 1776, a committee was appointed to prepare and digest the form of a confederation to be entered into between the United Colonies, which brought in a draft (in the hand writing of Mr. John Dickinson) on the 12th of the succeeding month.

In June 1776, a committee was set up to create and organize the framework for a confederation among the United Colonies, which resulted in a draft (written by Mr. John Dickinson) on the 12th of the following month.

This report was under debate until the 14th of November, 1777, on which day congress agreed on the articles afterwards adopted by the states.

This report was discussed until November 14, 1777, when Congress agreed on the articles that were later adopted by the states.

In the scheme supposed to be prepared by Mr. Dickinson, the confederation is considered as an alliance of sovereign states, who meet as equals by their deputies assembled to deliberate on their common concerns, each sovereign having a voice. This principle was retained; but several modifications in the language and principle of the original scheme were made, which indicate a watchful and growing jealousy of the powers of congress.

In the plan that Mr. Dickinson was supposed to prepare, the confederation is viewed as an alliance of independent states, where they gather as equals through their representatives to discuss shared issues, with each state having a say. This idea was kept, but various changes in the wording and principles of the original plan were made, reflecting a careful and increasing concern about the powers of Congress.

In each, an article is introduced reserving the rights of the states. That which is found in the report, "reserves to each state the sole and exclusive regulation and government of its internal police, in all matters that shall not interfere with the articles of this confederation."

In each, an article is introduced that protects the rights of the states. The report states, "reserves to each state the sole and exclusive regulation and management of its internal affairs, in all matters that shall not interfere with the articles of this confederation."

This article was so modified as to declare that "each state retains its sovereignty," "and every power, jurisdiction and right, which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to the United States in congress assembled."

This article was changed to state that "each state keeps its sovereignty," "and every power, jurisdiction, and right that is not explicitly given to the United States in congress assembled."

This denial of all incidental powers had vast influence on the affairs of the United States. It defeated, in many instances, the granted powers, by rendering their exercise impracticable.

This refusal of any additional powers had a huge impact on the affairs of the United States. It often undermined the powers that were granted, making it difficult to actually use them.

The report permits the states to impose duties on imports and exports; provided they "do not interfere with any stipulations in treaties hereafter entered into by the United States."

The report allows states to impose duties on imports and exports, as long as they "do not conflict with any terms in treaties that the United States may enter into in the future."

The confederation confines this restriction on the power of the state to such duties as interfere with the stipulations in treaties entered into "in pursuance of any treaties already proposed by congress to the courts of France and Spain."

The confederation limits this restriction on state power to duties that conflict with the agreements made in treaties entered into "in pursuance of any treaties already proposed by congress to the courts of France and Spain."

Each plan assigns to the state in which troops shall be raised for the common defence, the power of appointing the field and inferior officers. The confederation adds the power of filling up such vacancies as may occur.

Each plan gives the state where troops are raised for common defense the authority to appoint field and lower-level officers. The confederation also adds the power to fill any vacancies that may arise.

The report inhibits a state from endeavouring by force to obtain compensation for advances made or injuries suffered during the war, which shall not be allowed by congress.

The report prevents a state from trying by force to get compensation for money spent or injuries suffered during the war, which Congress will not permit.

The confederation omits this inhibition.

The confederation ignores this restriction.

The report gives to congress the power of making treaties.

The report gives Congress the power to make treaties.

The confederation adds a proviso, "that no treaty of commerce shall be made whereby the legislative power of the respective states shall be restrained from imposing such imports and duties on foreigners as their own people are subjected to, or from prohibiting the exportation or importation of any species of goods or commodities whatever."

The confederation includes a condition: "No trade agreement can be made that limits the legislative power of the individual states from charging the same taxes and duties on foreign goods as they do on their own citizens, or from banning the export or import of any type of goods or products."

The report authorizes congress to appoint "courts for the trial of all crimes, frauds, and piracies committed on the high seas, or on any navigable river not within a county or parish."

The report allows Congress to set up "courts for the trial of all crimes, frauds, and piracy committed on the high seas, or on any navigable river not within a county or parish."

The confederation limits the jurisdiction to "piracies and felonies committed on the high seas."

The confederation restricts the authority to "piracies and crimes committed on the open seas."

Both empower congress to appoint courts for the trial of appeals in cases of capture; but the confederation provides that no member of congress shall be appointed a judge of any such court.

Both give Congress the power to set up courts for hearing appeals in cases of capture; however, the confederation states that no member of Congress shall be appointed as a judge of any such court.

Both empower congress to settle differences between the states. The confederation prescribes minutely the manner in which this power shall be exercised.

Both empower Congress to resolve conflicts between the states. The confederation clearly outlines how this power should be used.

Both empower congress "to regulate the trade and manage all affairs with the Indians." The confederation provides "that the legislative right of any state within its own limits be not infringed or violated."

Both empower Congress "to regulate trade and handle all affairs with the Indigenous peoples." The confederation states "that the legislative rights of any state within its own boundaries are not to be infringed or violated."

The report gives the power of "establishing and regulating post offices throughout all the United Colonies (states) on the lines of communication from one colony (state) to another."

The report grants the authority to "set up and manage post offices across all the United Colonies (states) along the communication routes connecting one colony (state) to another."

The confederation varies the phraseology and adds, "and exacting such postage on the papers passing through the same as may be requisite to defray the expenses of the said office."

The confederation changes the wording and adds, "and charging any postage on the papers going through it that may be necessary to cover the costs of the office."

The report places many important portions of the executive power in a council of state, to consist of one delegate from each state to be named annually by the delegates of that state.

The report assigns several key parts of the executive power to a council of state, which will be made up of one delegate from each state, chosen annually by that state's delegates.

The confederation empowers congress to appoint a committee to sit in the recess of congress, to be denominated "a committee of the states," and to consist of one delegate from each state, to exercise such powers as congress might from time to time vest them with.

The confederation allows Congress to appoint a committee to meet during Congress's recess, called "a committee of the states," which will have one delegate from each state, to exercise the powers that Congress may assign to them from time to time.

A few of the states agreed to ratify the confederation unconditionally. By many, amendments were proposed which were steadily rejected by congress. It was obvious that the delays would be almost interminable should congress relax this determination, because every change would make it necessary again to submit the instrument as amended to the several states. It is remarkable that Jersey alone proposed an enlargement of the powers of congress. That state was desirous of investing the representatives of the state with the power of regulating commerce.

A few states agreed to ratify the confederation without any conditions. Many proposed amendments, but Congress kept rejecting them. It was clear that the delays would be nearly endless if Congress backed down on this decision, since any change would require the revised document to be submitted again to the various states. It's notable that New Jersey was the only state that suggested expanding Congress's powers. That state wanted to give its representatives the authority to regulate commerce.

The states possessing no vacant lands, or an inconsiderable quantity within their chartered limits, pressed earnestly and perseveringly their claim to participate in the advantages of territory, which was, they said, acquired by the united arms of the whole; and Maryland refused, on this account, to accede to the confederation. At length, several of the states empowered their members in congress to ratify that instrument as forming a union between the twelve states who had assented to it. Maryland, alarmed at the prospect of being excluded from the union, gave her reluctant consent to the confederation, accompanied by a protest, in which she still asserted her claim to her interest in the vacant territory which should be acknowledged at the treaty of peace, to be within the United States.

The states with no available land, or only a small amount within their chartered borders, strongly and persistently pushed for their right to share in the benefits of territory, which they claimed was acquired by the combined efforts of all. Because of this, Maryland refused to join the confederation. Eventually, several states authorized their representatives in Congress to ratify the agreement that formed a union among the twelve states that had accepted it. Concerned about being left out of the union, Maryland reluctantly agreed to the confederation but included a protest asserting its claim to the vacant territory, which it wanted recognized at the peace treaty as belonging to the United States.

It required the repeated lessons of a severe and instructive experience to persuade the American people that their greatness, their prosperity, their happiness, and even their safety, imperiously demanded the substitution of a government for their favourite league.

It took the repeated lessons of a harsh and enlightening experience to convince the American people that their greatness, prosperity, happiness, and even safety urgently required replacing their beloved league with a government.

[72] The author was assured by General Lafayette that this was true. Such was the enthusiasm of the moment, that a lame sergeant hired a place in a cart to keep up with the army.

[72] The author was told by General Lafayette that this was true. The excitement of the moment was so strong that a disabled sergeant paid for a spot in a cart just to stay with the army.

[73] It is not unworthy of notice, that the ladies of Baltimore charged themselves with the toil of immediately making up the summer clothing for the troops. Innumerable instances of their zeal in the common cause of their country were given in every state in the union.

[73] It's worth noting that the women of Baltimore took it upon themselves to quickly sew summer clothing for the troops. Many examples of their dedication to the common cause of their country were seen in every state across the nation.

[74] General Lafayette states that this movement also facilitated the transportation of some military stores to the southern army, which were greatly needed.

[74] General Lafayette says that this effort also helped get some military supplies to the southern army, which were in high demand.

[75] General Philips died the day on which the army entered Petersburg. Arnold on succeeding to the command addressed a letter to Lafayette, which the American general refused to receive, informing the officer who brought it, and whom he treated in other respects with great politeness, that he would receive no letter from Arnold.—Cor. of Lafayette.

[75] General Philips died on the same day the army entered Petersburg. When Arnold took over command, he sent a letter to Lafayette, which the American general declined to accept. He politely informed the officer who delivered it that he wouldn't take any letters from Arnold.—Cor. of Lafayette.

[76] Seven fell into the hands of Tarlton.

Seven was captured by Tarlton.

[77] While the British army overran the country, their ships sailed up the rivers, pillaged the farms, received the slaves who fled from their masters, and, in some instances, reduced the houses to ashes. While they were in the Potowmac, a flag was sent on shore at Mount Vernon, requiring a supply of fresh provisions. The steward of General Washington, believing it to be his duty to save the property of his principal, and entertaining fears for the magnificent buildings of the Commander-in-chief, went on board with the flag, carried a supply of fresh provisions, asked the restoration of the slaves who had taken refuge in the fleet, and requested that the buildings might be spared. Mr. Lund Washington, to whom the general had entrusted the management of his estate, communicated these circumstances to him, and informed him that he too had sustained considerable losses. "I am sorry," said the general, in reply, "to hear of your loss; I am a little sorry to hear of my own. But that which gives me most concern is, that you should have gone on board the vessels of the enemy and furnished them with refreshments. It would have been a less painful circumstance to me to have heard, that in consequence of your non-compliance with their request, they had burnt my home and laid the plantation in ruins. You ought to have considered yourself as my representative, and should have reflected on the bad example of communicating with the enemy, and making a voluntary offer of refreshment to them, with a view to prevent a conflagration."

[77] While the British army took control of the country, their ships navigated the rivers, looted the farms, picked up the slaves who escaped from their masters, and in some cases, reduced homes to ashes. While they were in the Potomac, a flag was sent to shore at Mount Vernon, asking for a supply of fresh provisions. The steward of General Washington, feeling it was his duty to protect his employer’s property and worried about the magnificent buildings of the Commander-in-chief, went onboard with the flag, brought a supply of fresh provisions, requested the return of the slaves who had sought refuge in the fleet, and asked that the buildings be spared. Mr. Lund Washington, whom the general had put in charge of his estate, informed him of these events and told him that he, too, had suffered significant losses. "I am sorry," the general replied, "to hear about your loss; I’m a bit sorry to hear about my own. But what concerns me most is that you went on board the enemy’s ships and provided them with refreshments. It would have been less painful for me to hear that they burned my home and destroyed the plantation because you didn’t comply with their request. You should have seen yourself as my representative and thought about the bad example of communicating with the enemy and voluntarily offering them refreshments to try to prevent a fire."

[78] Correspondence with Lafayette.

Correspondence with Lafayette.

[79] See note No. V. at the end of the volume.

[79] See note No. V. at the end of the book.

[80] Sir H. Clinton in a letter to Lord Cornwallis, dated June 11, 1781, states his effective force at ten thousand nine hundred and thirty-one.

[80] Sir H. Clinton, in a letter to Lord Cornwallis dated June 11, 1781, reports that his effective force is ten thousand nine hundred thirty-one.

[81] In pursuance of these orders, Wayne was detached to the south side of James River, under the pretext of reinforcing Greene, but was ordered to maintain a position which would enable him to intercept and oppose the march of Lord Cornwallis, should he attempt to force his way to Charleston. Lafayette was on the alert to co-operate with Wayne in the event of such a movement.—Cor. with Lafayette.

[81] Following these orders, Wayne was sent to the south side of the James River, under the guise of supporting Greene, but he was instructed to hold a position that would allow him to intercept and confront Lord Cornwallis if he tried to push his way to Charleston. Lafayette was ready to work with Wayne if such a move occurred.—Cor. with Lafayette.

[82] This admiral was the senior of De Grasse, to whom the command of the expedition had been entrusted, and was therefore authorized by the minister of marine, to cruise on the coast of Newfoundland while his ships should join the grand fleet. He preferred serving under his junior officer.—Cor. of Lafayette.

[82] This admiral was senior to De Grasse, who had been given command of the expedition, and was therefore authorized by the minister of marine to patrol the coast of Newfoundland while his ships joined the larger fleet. He chose to serve under his junior officer.—Cor. of Lafayette.

[83] The first indication given by Sir Henry Clinton of suspecting the southern expedition, is in his letter to Lord Cornwallis of the 2nd of September, in which he says, "By intelligence I have this day received, it would seem that Washington is moving southward."

[83] The first sign that Sir Henry Clinton suspected the southern expedition is in his letter to Lord Cornwallis dated September 2nd, where he writes, "From the information I've received today, it seems that Washington is heading south."

[84] While the American troops were encamped at Williamsburg and the French fleet lay in the bay, the Count de Grasse, circumscribed in point of time, and therefore, unwilling to await the arrival of the army from the north, urged Lafayette to attack the British in Yorktown; offering to aid him not only with all the marines of the fleet, but with as many seamen as he should require. The Marquis de St. Simon, an officer of great experience, united himself with the admiral in pressing this measure. He stated that, the works of Cornwallis being incomplete, Yorktown and Gloucester might, in all probability, be carried by storm, if attacked by superior numbers. The temptation was great for a young general scarcely twenty-four years of age. A full excuse for the attempt was found in the declaration of De Grasse, that he could not wait for the arrival of the troops from the north. Success would have given unrivaled brilliancy to the reputation of Lafayette, but would necessarily have cost much blood. Lafayette refused to sacrifice the soldiers which were confided to him to his personal glory, and persuaded De Grasse to await the arrival of Washington and Rochambeau, when the capture of Cornwallis would be certainly made without the waste of human life.—Cor. with Lafayette.

[84] While the American troops were camped in Williamsburg and the French fleet was in the bay, Count de Grasse, limited by time and not wanting to wait for the army coming from the north, urged Lafayette to attack the British in Yorktown. He offered to support him not just with all the marines from the fleet, but also with as many sailors as he needed. The experienced officer Marquis de St. Simon joined the admiral in advocating for this action. He pointed out that Cornwallis' defenses were incomplete and that Yorktown and Gloucester could likely be taken by storm if they were attacked with superior numbers. The temptation was strong for a young general who was barely twenty-four years old. A valid reason for the attempt was De Grasse's declaration that he couldn't wait for the troops coming from the north. Success would have significantly boosted Lafayette's reputation, but it would have come at a great cost of lives. Lafayette chose not to sacrifice the soldiers under his command for his own glory and convinced De Grasse to wait for the arrival of Washington and Rochambeau, knowing that the capture of Cornwallis would be certain without unnecessary loss of life.—Cor. with Lafayette.

[85] One sergeant and eight privates were killed; and one lieutenant colonel, four captains, one subaltern, one sergeant, and twenty-five rank and file, were wounded.

[85] One sergeant and eight privates were killed, and one lieutenant colonel, four captains, one junior officer, one sergeant, and twenty-five enlisted personnel were injured.

The irritation produced by the recent carnage in fort Griswold had not so far subdued the humanity of the American character as to induce retaliation. Not a man was killed except in action. "Incapable," said Colonel Hamilton in his report, "of imitating examples of barbarity, and forgetting recent provocation, the soldiery spared every man that ceased to resist." Mr. Gordon, in his History of the American War, states the orders given by Lafayette, with the approbation of Washington, to have directed that every man in the redoubt, after its surrender, should be put to the sword. These sanguinary orders, so repugnant to the character of the Commander-in-chief and of Lafayette, were never given. There is no trace of them among the papers of General Washington; and Colonel Hamilton, who took a part in the enterprise, which assures his perfect knowledge of every material occurrence, has publicly contradicted the statement. It has been also contradicted by Lafayette.

The anger caused by the recent massacre at Fort Griswold hadn't yet overwhelmed the compassion of the American spirit enough to prompt revenge. No one was killed except in battle. "Unable," Colonel Hamilton stated in his report, "to mimic acts of brutality and putting aside the recent provocation, the soldiers spared everyone who stopped fighting." Mr. Gordon, in his History of the American War, mentions the orders given by Lafayette, with Washington's approval, that directed every man in the redoubt to be killed after it surrendered. These bloody orders, which are completely contrary to the character of both the Commander-in-chief and Lafayette, were never issued. There’s no evidence of them in General Washington's papers; and Colonel Hamilton, who was involved in the operation and thus had full knowledge of every significant event, has publicly denied this account. Lafayette has also refuted it.

[86] General Lafayette states a fact which proves in an eminent degree the good feelings of the American soldiers towards their allies. While encamped together under his command at Williamsburg, the Americans, who were bivouacked, saw their allies under tents without a murmur; and saw them supplied regularly with rations of flour for three days from the American magazines, while corn meal was measured out very irregularly to themselves. The superior officers lent their horses to those of France and walked themselves. Although their general was himself a Frenchman, the Americans saw not only without jealousy, but with pleasure, every preference given to their allies.

[86] General Lafayette points out a fact that clearly shows the good feelings of the American soldiers toward their allies. While camped together under his command at Williamsburg, the Americans, who were set up in temporary shelters, saw their allies in tents without complaint; they also noticed that the French received regular flour rations for three days from American supplies, while they themselves received cornmeal inconsistently. The higher-ranking officers offered their horses to the French and walked instead. Even though their general was a Frenchman, the Americans not only accepted but also appreciated the advantages given to their allies.

[87] Stedman, Annual Register, letter of Lord Cornwallis.

[87] Stedman, Annual Register, letter from Lord Cornwallis.

[88] See note No. VI. at the end of the volume.

[88] See note No. VI. at the end of the book.

[89] See note No. VII. at the end of the volume.

[89] Check note No. VII. at the back of the book.

[90] The return of prisoners contained two generals, thirty-one field officers, three hundred and twenty-six captains and subalterns, seventy-one regimental staff, six thousand five hundred and twenty-seven non-commissioned officers and privates, and one hundred and twenty-four persons belonging to the hospital, commissary, and wagon departments, making in the whole seven thousand and seventy-three prisoners. To this number are to be added six commissioned, and twenty-eight non-commissioned officers and privates made prisoners in the two redoubts which were stormed, and in the sortie made by the garrison.

[90] The return of prisoners included two generals, thirty-one field officers, three hundred twenty-six captains and junior officers, seventy-one regimental staff, six thousand five hundred twenty-seven non-commissioned officers and soldiers, and one hundred twenty-four individuals from the hospital, commissary, and wagon departments, totaling seven thousand seventy-three prisoners. To this number, we add six commissioned officers and twenty-eight non-commissioned officers and soldiers captured in the two redoubts that were stormed, as well as during the sortie made by the garrison.

[91] See note No. VIII. at the end of the volume.

[91] See note No. VIII. at the end of the book.

[92] See note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

[92] Check out note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

 book spines

book spines

 

 George Washington

George Washington

From the painting by James Sharples

From the painting by James Sharples

Sharples is distinguished for having painted what the Washington family regarded as the most faithful likenesses of the Father of His Country. This portrait in particular is the best resemblance we have of Washington during the period between his resignation as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army and his inauguration as First President of the United States. The Sharples portraits of Washington were commissioned by Robert Cary, a London merchant and admirer of our First President, who sent the artist on a special trip to America to do the work. This and other portraits by Sharples of Washington and his compeers long remained in England, but are now in the Collection of Herbert L. Pratt, New York.

Sharples is known for painting what the Washington family considered to be the most accurate likenesses of the Father of His Country. This particular portrait is the best representation we have of Washington during the time between his resignation as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army and his inauguration as the first President of the United States. The Sharples portraits of Washington were commissioned by Robert Cary, a London merchant and admirer of our first President, who sent the artist on a special trip to America to create them. This and other portraits by Sharples of Washington and his peers stayed in England for a long time but are now part of the Collection of Herbert L. Pratt, New York.


THE

LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON,

COMMANDER IN CHIEF

OF THE

AMERICAN FORCES,

DURING THE WAR WHICH ESTABLISHED THE INDEPENDENCE OF HIS COUNTRY,

AND

FIRST PRESIDENT

OF THE

UNITED STATES.

COMPILED UNDER THE INSPECTION OF

THE HONOURABLE BUSHROD WASHINGTON,

FROM

ORIGINAL PAPERS

BEQUEATHED TO HIM BY HIS DECEASED RELATIVE, AND NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR.

TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,

AN INTRODUCTION,

CONTAINING A COMPENDIOUS VIEW OF THE COLONIES PLANTED BY THE ENGLISH ON THE

CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA,

FROM THEIR SETTLEMENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THAT WAR WHICH TERMINATED IN THEIR

INDEPENDENCE.

BY JOHN MARSHALL.

VOL. IV.


THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

1926

Printed in the U.S.A.

Made in the U.S.A.

 

title page

title page

 

subscription

subscription


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

Greene invests Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Progress of Marion and Lee.... Lord Rawdon retires into the lower country.... Greene invests Ninety Six.... Is repulsed.... Retires from that place.... Active movements of the two armies.... After a short repose they resume active operations.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army retires towards Charleston.

Greene surrounds Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Progress of Marion and Lee.... Lord Rawdon pulls back into the low country.... Greene surrounds Ninety Six.... Is pushed back.... Leaves that location.... Both armies are actively moving.... After a brief rest, they start operations again.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army retreats toward Charleston.

CHAPTER II.

Preparations for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain. Conciliatory conduct of General Carleton.... Transactions in the south.... Negotiations for peace.... Preliminary and eventual articles agreed upon between the United States and Great Britain.... Discontents of the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny of a part of the Pennsylvania line.... Evacuation of New York.... General Washington resigns his commission and retires to Mount Vernon.

Preparations for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain. General Carleton's conciliatory actions.... Events in the south.... Peace negotiations.... Preliminary and final articles agreed upon between the United States and Great Britain.... Discontent in the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny among some of the Pennsylvania line.... Evacuation of New York.... General Washington resigns his commission and returns to Mount Vernon.

CHAPTER III.

General Washington devotes his time to rural pursuits.... to the duties of friendship.... and to institutions of public utility.... Resolves of Congress and of the Legislature of Virginia for erecting statues to his honour.... Recommends improvement in inland navigation.... Declines accepting a donation made to him by his native state.... The society of the Cincinnati.... He is elected President.... The causes which led to a change of the government of the United States.... Circular letter of General Washington to the governors of the several states.

General Washington spends his time on farming activities, fulfilling his friendship obligations, and working on public service projects. Resolutions from Congress and the Virginia Legislature to create statues in his honor. He suggests enhancements to inland navigation. He turns down a donation offered by his home state. The Society of the Cincinnati. He is elected President. The reasons behind the change in the U.S. government. A circular letter from General Washington to the governors of the states.

CHAPTER IV.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams appointed minister to Great Britain.... Discontents excited by the commercial regulations of Britain.... Parties in the United States.... The convention at Annapolis.... Virginia appoints deputies to a convention at Philadelphia.... General Washington chosen one of them.... Insurrection at Massachusetts.... Convention at Philadelphia.... A form of government submitted to the respective states, as ratified by eleven of them.... Correspondence of General Washington respecting the chief magistracy.... He is elected president.... Meeting of the first congress.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams was appointed as minister to Great Britain.... Discontent caused by Britain's commercial regulations.... Political parties in the United States.... The convention in Annapolis.... Virginia appoints representatives to a convention in Philadelphia.... General Washington is chosen as one of them.... Insurrection in Massachusetts.... The convention in Philadelphia.... A proposed government submitted to the individual states, which was ratified by eleven of them.... Correspondence of General Washington regarding the presidency.... He is elected president.... The first congress meets.

CHAPTER V.

The election of General Washington officially announced to him.... His departure for the seat of government.... Marks of affection shown him on his journey.... His inauguration and speech to Congress.... His system of intercourse with the world.... Letters on this and other subjects.... Answers of both houses of Congress to the speech.... Domestic and foreign relations of the United States.... Debates on the impost and tonnage bills.... On the power of removal from office.... On the policy of the secretary of the treasury reporting plans of revenue.... On the style of the President.... Amendments to the constitution.... Appointment of executive officers, and of the judges.... Adjournment of the first session of congress.... The President visits New England.... His reception.... North Carolina accedes to the union.

The election of General Washington officially notified him.... His trip to the capital.... The affection shown to him during his journey.... His inauguration and speech to Congress.... His approach to interacting with the world.... Letters on this and other topics.... Responses from both houses of Congress to the speech.... Domestic and international relations of the United States.... Debates on the tax and shipping bills.... Discussions about the power to remove from office.... The policy of the Secretary of the Treasury presenting revenue plans.... On the President's style.... Amendments to the constitution.... Appointments of executive officers and judges.... The adjournment of the first session of Congress.... The President visits New England.... His welcome.... North Carolina joins the union.

CHAPTER VI.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Report of the secretary of the treasury on public credit.... Debate thereon.... Bill for fixing the permanent seat of government.... Adjournment of congress.... Treaty with the Creek Indians.... Relations of the United States with Great Britain and Spain.... The President visits Mount Vernon.... Session of congress.... The President's speech.... Debates on the excise.... On a national bank.... The opinions of the cabinet on the law.... Progress of parties.... War with the Indians.... Defeat of Harmar.... Adjournment of congress.

Meeting of Congress... President’s speech... Report from the Secretary of the Treasury on public credit... Debate on that... Bill to establish the permanent seat of government... Adjournment of Congress... Treaty with the Creek Indians... Relations of the United States with Great Britain and Spain... The President visits Mount Vernon... Session of Congress... The President's speech... Debates on the excise tax... On a national bank... The cabinet's opinions on the law... Progress of political parties... War with the Indians... Defeat of Harmar... Adjournment of Congress.

CHAPTER VII.

General St. Clair appointed Commander-in-chief.... The President makes a tour through the southern states.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Debate on the bill for apportioning representatives.... Military law.... Defeat of St. Clair.... Opposition to the increase of the army.... Report of the Secretary of the Treasury for raising additional supplies.... Congress adjourns.... Strictures on the conduct of administration, with a view of parties.... Disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury.... Letters from General Washington.... Opposition to the excise law.... President's proclamation.... Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo.... General Wayne appointed to the command of the army.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Resolutions implicating the Secretary of the Treasury, rejected.... Congress adjourns.... Progress of the French revolution, and its effects on parties in the United States.

General St. Clair was appointed Commander-in-Chief... The President tours the southern states... Congress meets... The President gives a speech... There’s a debate on the bill to apportion representatives... Military law... St. Clair's defeat... Opposition to increasing the army... The Secretary of the Treasury reports on raising additional funds... Congress adjourns... Critiques of the administration's conduct, considering party views... Disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury... Letters from General Washington... Opposition to the excise tax... The President issues a proclamation... Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo... General Wayne is appointed to command the army... Congress meets... The President's speech... Resolutions involving the Secretary of the Treasury are rejected... Congress adjourns... Developments in the French Revolution and its impact on parties in the United States.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

George Washington

Livingston Manor, Dobbs Ferry, New York

The Long Room in Fraunces' Tavern, New York City

The Old Senate Chamber at Annapolis, Maryland, Where Washington Resigned His Commission

The Room in Which the First Constitutional Convention Met in Philadelphia

Washington Taking the Oath of Office

View of the Old City or Federal Hall, New York, in 1789

Tomb of Mary, Mother of Washington


THE LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON


CHAPTER I.

Greene invests Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Progress of Marion and Lee.... Lord Rawdon retires into the lower country.... Greene invests Ninety Six.... Is repulsed.... Retires from that place.... Active movements of the two armies.... After a short repose they resume active operations.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army retires towards Charleston.

Greene surrounds Camden.... Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.... Marion and Lee make progress.... Lord Rawdon falls back into the low country.... Greene surrounds Ninety Six.... Is pushed back.... Retreats from that area.... Both armies are active.... After a brief rest, they start engaging again.... Battle of Eutaw.... The British army pulls back towards Charleston.

 

1781

In South Carolina and Georgia, the campaign of 1781 was uncommonly active. The importance of the object, the perseverance with which it was pursued, the talents of the generals, the courage, activity, and sufferings of the armies, and the accumulated miseries of the inhabitants, gave to the contest for these states, a degree of interest seldom bestowed on military transactions, in which greater numbers have not been employed.

In South Carolina and Georgia, the 1781 campaign was unusually intense. The significance of the goal, the determination with which it was chased, the skills of the generals, the bravery, energy, and hardships of the troops, and the accumulated struggles of the people made the fight for these states more compelling than most military events where larger forces were involved.

When Lord Cornwallis entered North Carolina, the military operations in the more southern states were committed to Lord Rawdon. For the preservation of his power, a line of posts slightly fortified had been continued from Charleston, by the way of Camden and Ninety Six, to Augusta, in Georgia. The spirit of resistance was still kept up in the north-western and north-eastern parts of the state, by Generals Sumpter and Marion, who respectively commanded a corps of militia. Their exertions, though great, seem not to have been successful; and they excited no alarm, because no addition to their strength was apprehended.

When Lord Cornwallis entered North Carolina, the military operations in the southern states were handed over to Lord Rawdon. To maintain his control, a series of lightly fortified posts had been established from Charleston, through Camden and Ninety Six, to Augusta in Georgia. The spirit of resistance continued in the northwestern and northeastern parts of the state, led by Generals Sumpter and Marion, who each commanded a group of militia. Despite their significant efforts, they didn’t seem to achieve success, and they caused no concern since no increase in their forces was feared.

Such was the situation of the country when General Greene formed the bold resolution of endeavouring to reannex it to the American union. His army consisted of about eighteen hundred men. The prospect of procuring subsistence was unpromising, and the chance of reinforcements precarious. He was apprized of the dangers to be encountered, but believed it to be for the public interest to meet them. "I shall take every measure," said this gallant officer, in a letter communicating his plan of operations to General Washington, "to avoid a misfortune. But necessity obliges me to commit myself to chance, and if any accident should attend me, I trust my friends will do justice to my reputation."

The country was in this situation when General Greene made the bold decision to try to bring it back into the American union. His army was about eighteen hundred strong. The chances of securing food were slim, and the possibility of reinforcements was uncertain. He was aware of the dangers he would face but believed it was in the public's best interest to confront them. "I will do everything,” this brave officer wrote in a letter to General Washington outlining his plan, “to avoid a misfortune. But necessity forces me to take risks, and if anything happens to me, I trust my friends will recognize my reputation."

The extensive line of posts maintained by Lord Rawdon, presented to Greene many objects, at which, it was probable he might strike with advantage. The day preceding his march from the camp on Deep river, he detached Lee to join General Marion, and communicated his intention of entering South Carolina to General Pickens with a request that he would assemble the western militia, and lay siege to Ninety Six, and Augusta.

The long line of posts held by Lord Rawdon offered Greene several potential targets that he could attack effectively. The day before his march from the camp on Deep River, he sent Lee to join General Marion and informed General Pickens of his plans to enter South Carolina, asking him to gather the western militia and lay siege to Ninety Six and Augusta.

April.
Green invests Camden.

Having made these arrangements, he moved from Deep river on the seventh of April, and encamped before Camden on the nineteenth of the same month, within half a mile of the British works. Lord Rawdon had received early notice of his approach, and was prepared for his reception.

Having made these plans, he left Deep River on April 7th and set up camp near Camden on the 19th, within half a mile of the British fortifications. Lord Rawdon had been warned of his arrival in advance and was ready for him.

April 24.

Camden stands on a gentle elevation, and is covered on the south and south-west by the Wateree,[1] and on the east by Pine-tree creek. A strong chain of redoubts, extending from the river to the creek, protected the north and west sides of the town. Being unable to storm the works or to invest them on all sides, Greene contented himself with lying before the place in the hope of being reinforced by militia, or of some event which might bring on an action in the open field. With this view he retired a small distance, and encamped on Hobkirk's hill, about a mile and a half from the town. While in this situation, he received information that Colonel Watson was marching up the Santee with about four hundred men. A junction between these two divisions of the British army, could be prevented only by intercepting Watson while at a distance from Camden. For this purpose, he crossed Sand-hill creek and encamped east of Camden, on the road leading to Charleston. It being impracticable to transport the artillery and baggage over the deep marshes adjoining the creek, Colonel Carrington with the North Carolina militia was directed to convey them to a place of safety, and to guard them till farther orders. The army continued a few days in its new encampment, during which the troops subsisted on the scanty supplies furnished by the neighbourhood. Greene was compelled at length, by the want of provisions, to relinquish this position. About the same time he received intelligence which induced him to doubt the approach of Watson. On which he ordered Lieutenant Colonel Carrington to rejoin him; and on the 24th, returned to the north side of the town, and again encamped on Hobkirk's hill, a ridge covered with uninterrupted wood through which the great Waxhaw road passes. The army was encamped in order of battle, its left covered by the swamp of Pine-tree creek.

Camden is located on a gentle rise, with the Wateree River to the south and southwest, and Pine-tree Creek to the east. A strong line of redoubts runs from the river to the creek, shielding the town from the north and west sides. Unable to storm the defenses or surround them completely, Greene opted to remain nearby in hopes of being reinforced by local militia or that some event would lead to an open field confrontation. With this strategy in mind, he moved a short distance away and set up camp on Hobkirk's Hill, about a mile and a half from the town. While there, he learned that Colonel Watson was advancing up the Santee with around four hundred men. To prevent a merger between the two British army divisions, he needed to intercept Watson while he was still far from Camden. To achieve this, he crossed Sand-hill Creek and camped to the east of Camden, along the road to Charleston. Since it was impractical to move the artillery and supplies over the deep marshes next to the creek, Colonel Carrington and the North Carolina militia were tasked with transporting them to safety and guarding them until further notice. The army remained in this new camp for a few days, relying on limited provisions from the local area. Eventually, Greene had to abandon this position due to food shortages. Around the same time, he received information that made him doubt Watson's approach. He then ordered Lieutenant Colonel Carrington to rejoin him. On the 24th, he returned to the north side of the town and reestablished camp on Hobkirk's Hill, a ridge covered with dense woods through which the main Waxhaw road passes. The army was arranged in battle order, with its left flank protected by the swamp of Pine-tree Creek.

April 25.

A drummer, who deserted on the morning after Greene's return, and before he was rejoined by Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, gave information to Lord Rawdon that the artillery and militia had been detached. His lordship determined to seize this favourable occasion for fighting his enemy to advantage, and, at the head of nine hundred men, marched out of town on the morning of the twenty-fifth to attack the American army.

A drummer, who left on the morning after Greene's return, and before he was reunited with Lieutenant Colonel Carrington, informed Lord Rawdon that the artillery and militia had been sent away. His lordship decided to take advantage of this opportunity to engage his enemy effectively, and, leading nine hundred men, marched out of town on the morning of the twenty-fifth to confront the American army.

Lieutenant Colonel Carrington had arrived in camp that morning, and brought with him a supply of provisions which had been issued to the troops, some of whom were employed in cooking and others in washing their clothes. Notwithstanding those occupations, they were in reach of their arms, and were in readiness to take their ground and engage at a moment's warning.

Lieutenant Colonel Carrington had arrived at camp that morning and brought a supply of food that was distributed among the troops, some of whom were cooking while others were washing their clothes. Despite being busy, they were within reach of their weapons and ready to take their positions and engage at a moment's notice.

Battle of Hobkirk's Hill.

By keeping close to the swamp, and making a circuit of some distance, Lord Rawdon gained the American left without being perceived; and about eleven, his approach was announced by the fire of the advanced piquets, who were half a mile in front of Greene's encampment. Orders were instantly given to form the American line of battle.

By staying close to the swamp and taking a longer path, Lord Rawdon reached the American left without being noticed; and around eleven, his arrival was signaled by the gunfire from the front guards, who were half a mile ahead of Greene's camp. Orders were immediately issued to set up the American battle line.

The Virginia brigade commanded by General Huger, consisting of two regiments under Campbell and Hawes, was drawn up on the right of the great road. The Maryland brigade commanded by Colonel Williams, consisting also of two regiments, under Gunby and Ford, was on the left, and the artillery was placed in the centre. The North Carolina militia under Colonel Read formed a second line; and Captain Kirkwood with the light infantry was placed in front for the purpose of supporting the piquets, and retarding the advance of the enemy. General Greene remained on the right, with Campbell's regiment.

The Virginia brigade led by General Huger, made up of two regiments under Campbell and Hawes, was positioned on the right side of the main road. The Maryland brigade, headed by Colonel Williams and also composed of two regiments under Gunby and Ford, was on the left, with artillery set up in the center. The North Carolina militia, commanded by Colonel Read, formed a second line, and Captain Kirkwood with the light infantry was stationed in front to support the pickets and slow down the enemy's advance. General Greene stayed on the right with Campbell's regiment.

Captain Morgan of Virginia, and Captain Benson of Maryland, who commanded the piquets, gave the enemy a warm reception; but were soon compelled to retire. Captain Kirkwood also was driven in, and the British troops appeared in view. Rawdon continued his march through the wood along the low ground in front of the Maryland brigade which was in the act of forming, until he reached the road, where he displayed his column.

Captain Morgan from Virginia and Captain Benson from Maryland, who led the pickets, welcomed the enemy with force; but they were soon forced to pull back. Captain Kirkwood was also pushed back, and the British troops came into sight. Rawdon kept moving through the woods along the low ground in front of the Maryland brigade that was forming, until he reached the road, where he showed his column.

Perceiving that the British advanced with a narrow front, Greene ordered Colonel Ford, whose regiment was on the extreme left, and Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, whose regiment was on the extreme right, severally to attack their flanks, while Gunby and Hawes should advance upon their front with charged bayonets. To complete their destruction by cutting off their retreat to the town, Lieutenant Colonel Washington was ordered to pass their left flank and charge them in the rear.

Perceiving that the British were advancing in a narrow formation, Greene instructed Colonel Ford, whose regiment was on the far left, and Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, whose regiment was on the far right, to attack their flanks. Meanwhile, Gunby and Hawes were to move forward directly at them with bayonets drawn. To ensure their defeat by blocking their escape to the town, Lieutenant Colonel Washington was directed to go around their left flank and charge from the rear.

The regiments commanded by Ford and Campbell, being composed chiefly of new levies, did not change their ground, and perform the evolutions necessary for the duty assigned to them, with the requisite rapidity and precision; in consequence of which Rawdon, who instantly perceived the danger that threatened his flanks, had time to extend his front by bringing the volunteers of Ireland into his line.

The regiments led by Ford and Campbell, mostly made up of new recruits, didn’t shift their position or execute the necessary maneuvers for their assigned duty with the needed speed and accuracy. As a result, Rawdon, who quickly recognized the threat to his sides, had the opportunity to widen his front by bringing the Irish volunteers into his line.

This judicious movement disconcerted the design on his flanks, and brought the two armies into action fronting each other. But the regiments of Ford and Campbell were thrown into some confusion by the abortive attempt to gain the flanks of the British.

This clever maneuver upset the plan on his sides and brought the two armies into direct confrontation. However, the regiments of Ford and Campbell were thrown into some chaos by the failed attempt to outflank the British.

Colonel Washington too was compelled by the thick underwood and felled trees which obstructed his direct course, to make so extensive a circuit, that he came into the rear of the British at a greater distance from the scene of action than was intended, in consequence of which he fell in with their medical and other staff, and with a number of the followers of the army and idle spectators, who took no part in the action. Too humane to cut his way through this crowd, he employed so much time in taking their verbal parole, that he could not reach the rear of the British line until the battle was ended. These casualties disappointed this very interesting part of Greene's intended operations.[2]

Colonel Washington was also forced to take a long detour due to the thick underbrush and fallen trees blocking his direct path. As a result, he ended up approaching the British from behind, farther away from the action than he had planned. This led him to encounter their medical staff and some of the army's followers and spectators who weren't involved in the fighting. Being too compassionate to push through the crowd, he spent a lot of time securing their verbal promises not to fight, which meant he couldn't reach the back of the British line until after the battle was over. These setbacks thwarted a crucial part of Greene's planned operations.[2]

The artillery, however, played on the enemy with considerable effect; and the regiments of Gunby and Hawes advanced on the British front with resolution. Some companies on the right of the Maryland regiment returned the fire of the enemy, and their example was followed by the others. Notwithstanding this departure from orders, they continued to advance with intrepidity, and Greene entertained sanguine hopes of victory. His prospects were blasted by one of those incidents against which military prudence can make no provision.

The artillery, however, had a significant impact on the enemy; and the regiments of Gunby and Hawes moved forward against the British front with determination. Some companies on the right side of the Maryland regiment fired back at the enemy, setting an example for the others to follow. Despite this break from orders, they continued to advance fearlessly, and Greene had optimistic hopes for victory. His chances were shattered by one of those unexpected events that military planning can't account for.

Captain Beaty, who commanded on the right of Gunby's regiment, was killed, upon which his company with that adjoining it got into confusion and dropped out of the line. Gunby ordered the other companies, which were still advancing, to fall back, and form, with the two companies, behind the hill which the British were ascending. This retrograde movement was mistaken for a retreat, and the regiment gave way. Encouraged by this circumstance, the British pressed forward with increased ardour, and all the efforts of Colonel Williams, and of Gunby and Howard, to rally the regiment were, for a time, ineffectual. This veteran regiment, distinguished alike for its discipline and courage, which with the cavalry of Washington, had won the battle of the Cowpens, and nearly won that at Guilford court house, was seized with an unaccountable panic which, for a time, resisted all the efforts of their officers.

Captain Beaty, who was in charge on the right side of Gunby's regiment, was killed, causing his company and the one next to it to become disorganized and fall out of formation. Gunby instructed the other companies that were still moving forward to fall back and regroup behind the hill that the British were climbing. This backward movement was mistaken for a retreat, and the regiment began to break. Taking advantage of this situation, the British charged forward with more intensity, and all the attempts by Colonel Williams, Gunby, and Howard to regroup the regiment were ineffective for a while. This veteran regiment, known for its discipline and bravery, which had fought alongside Washington’s cavalry to win the battle of the Cowpens and nearly secure a victory at Guilford Courthouse, suddenly fell into an inexplicable panic that momentarily overwhelmed the efforts of their officers.

The flight of the first Maryland regiment increased the confusion which the change of ground had produced in the second; and, in attempting to restore order, Colonel Ford was mortally wounded. Lord Rawdon improved these advantages to the utmost. His right gained the summit of the hill, forced the artillery to retire, and turned the flank of the second Virginia regiment, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Hawes, which had advanced some distance down the hill. By this time the first Virginia regiment, which Greene had endeavoured to lead in person against the left flank of the British, being also in some disorder, began to give ground. Perceiving this reverse in his affairs, and knowing that he could not rely on his second line, Greene thought it most adviseable to secure himself from the hazard of a total defeat by withdrawing the second Virginia regiment from the action.

The retreat of the first Maryland regiment added to the chaos that the change in position had already created for the second. In trying to restore order, Colonel Ford was fatally wounded. Lord Rawdon took full advantage of this situation. His right flank reached the top of the hill, forced the artillery to pull back, and outflanked the second Virginia regiment, led by Lieutenant Colonel Hawes, which had pushed down the hill a bit. By this point, the first Virginia regiment, which Greene had tried to personally lead against the left side of the British, was also in disarray and started to fall back. Realizing his situation was deteriorating and knowing he couldn’t count on his second line, Greene decided it was best to protect himself from a complete defeat by pulling the second Virginia regiment out of the fight.

The Maryland brigade was in part rallied; but Lord Rawdon had gained the hill, and it was thought too late to retrieve the fortune of the day. Greene determined to reserve his troops for a more auspicious moment, and ordered a retreat.

The Maryland brigade was partially gathered; however, Lord Rawdon had taken the hill, and it seemed too late to turn the tide of the day. Greene decided to hold back his troops for a better opportunity and commanded a retreat.

Finding that the infantry had retreated, Colonel Washington also retired with the loss of only three men, bringing with him about fifty prisoners, among whom were all the surgeons belonging to the British army.

Finding that the infantry had pulled back, Colonel Washington also withdrew with only three men lost, bringing along around fifty prisoners, including all the surgeons from the British army.

The Americans retreated in good order about four miles from the field of battle, and proceeded, next day, to Rugeley's mills. The pursuit was continued about three miles. In the course of it, some sharp skirmishing took place, which was terminated by a vigorous charge made by Colonel Washington on a corps of British horse who led their van. This corps being broken and closely pursued, the infantry in its rear retreated precipitately into Camden.

The Americans pulled back in an orderly fashion about four miles from the battlefield and moved on to Rugeley's mills the next day. The pursuit went on for about three miles. During this, there were some intense skirmishes that ended with a strong charge by Colonel Washington against a group of British cavalry at the front. This group was broken up and chased down, causing the infantry behind them to retreat quickly into Camden.

April 26.

The number of continental troops engaged in this action amounted to about twelve hundred[3] men, and the loss in killed, wounded, and missing, to two hundred and sixty-six. Among the killed was Captain Beaty, of Maryland, who was mentioned by General Greene as an ornament to his profession; and among the wounded was Colonel Ford, of Maryland, a gallant officer, whose wounds proved mortal. The militia attached to the army amounted to two hundred and sixty-six, of whom two were missing. The total loss sustained by the British army has been stated at two hundred and fifty-eight, of whom thirty-eight were killed in the field.

The number of continental troops involved in this action was around twelve hundred [3] men, with losses including killed, wounded, and missing totaling two hundred and sixty-six. Among the fatalities was Captain Beaty from Maryland, who General Greene praised as an asset to his profession. Among the wounded was Colonel Ford from Maryland, a brave officer, whose injuries turned out to be fatal. The militia attached to the army numbered two hundred and sixty-six, with two reported missing. The total loss for the British army has been estimated at two hundred and fifty-eight, with thirty-eight killed in the field.

The plan which the strength of Camden and his own weakness had induced General Greene originally to adopt, was still substantially pursued. He remained in the vicinity of that place, and by the activity of his cavalry, straightened the communication of the garrison with the neighbouring country. Their distress for provisions had been considerably increased by the progress of Marion and Lee.

The plan that Camden's strength and his own weakness led General Greene to adopt was still largely in effect. He stayed near that area and, through the efforts of his cavalry, improved the communication between the garrison and the surrounding region. Their struggle for food had significantly worsened due to the advances of Marion and Lee.

Several British posts taken.

Lieutenant Colonel Lee joined Marion a few days after he was detached from the camp on Deep river; and these two officers commenced their operations against the line of communication between Camden and Charleston, by laying siege to fort Watson, which capitulated in a few days. The acquisition of this fort afforded the means of interrupting the intercourse between Camden and Charleston, and opposed an obstacle to the retreat of Lord Rawdon which he would have found it difficult to surmount.

Lieutenant Colonel Lee joined Marion a few days after he was separated from the camp on Deep River; and these two officers began their operations against the communication route between Camden and Charleston by laying siege to Fort Watson, which surrendered in a few days. Taking control of this fort provided the means to disrupt the connection between Camden and Charleston and posed a significant challenge to Lord Rawdon's retreat that he would have struggled to overcome.

From the increasing perils of his situation, his lordship was relieved by the arrival of Colonel Watson.

From the growing dangers of his situation, his lordship was relieved by the arrival of Colonel Watson.

In attempting to obey the orders, which were given by Lord Rawdon on the approach of Greene, to join him at Camden, that officer found himself opposed by Marion and Lee, who had seized the passes over the creeks in his route; and had thus completely arrested his march. To elude these vigilant adversaries, Watson returned down the Santee, and crossing that river near its mouth, marched up its southern side, and recrossing it above the American detachment, and, eluding all the measures taken to intercept him, accomplished his object with much toil and hazard.

In trying to follow the orders given by Lord Rawdon as Greene approached, that officer found himself facing Marion and Lee, who had taken control of the crossings over the creeks in his path, completely halting his progress. To outmaneuver these watchful opponents, Watson went back down the Santee, crossed the river near its mouth, marched up the southern bank, and then crossed it again above the American troops. By avoiding all the efforts made to stop him, he achieved his goal with great difficulty and risk.

This reinforcement gave the British general a decided superiority; and Greene entertained no doubt of its being immediately employed. On the day of its arrival, therefore, he withdrew from the neighbourhood of Camden, and took a strong position behind Sawney's creek.

This support gave the British general a clear advantage, and Greene had no doubt it would be used right away. So, on the day it arrived, he pulled back from the area around Camden and took a solid position behind Sawney's Creek.

May 7.

On the night of the seventh, as had been conjectured, Rawdon passed the Wateree at Camden ferry, intending to turn the flank of his enemy, and to attack his rear, where the ground was less difficult than in front. On being informed that the American army had changed its position, he followed it to its new encampment. This was so judiciously chosen that he despaired of being able to force it; and, after some ineffectual manoeuvres to draw Greene from it, returned to Camden.

On the night of the seventh, as suspected, Rawdon crossed the Wateree at Camden ferry, planning to outmaneuver his enemy and attack from behind, where the terrain was easier than in the front. When he learned that the American army had moved, he followed it to its new camp. The position was so strategically chosen that he felt he couldn't break through it; and after some unsuccessful attempts to lure Greene away, he returned to Camden.

Eighth.

Lord Rawdon had been induced to relinquish, thus hastily, his designs upon Greene, by the insecurity of his situation. The state of the British power in South Carolina was such as to require a temporary surrender of the upper country. Marion and Lee, after completely destroying his line of communication on the north side of the Santee, had crossed that river, and permitted no convoy from Charleston to escape their vigilance. On the eighth of May, after Watson had passed them, they laid siege to a post at Motte's house, on the south side of the Congaree, near its junction with the Wateree, which had been made the depot of all the supplies designed for Camden.

Lord Rawdon was forced to quickly abandon his plans against Greene due to the instability of his situation. The British control in South Carolina was such that they had to temporarily give up the upper country. Marion and Lee, after completely cutting off his supply lines north of the Santee, had crossed the river and made sure that no supplies from Charleston could slip past them. On May 8th, after Watson had moved past them, they laid siege to a post at Motte's house, located on the south side of the Congaree, near where it meets the Wateree, which had served as the main supply depot for Camden.

From the energy of this party as well as from the defection of the inhabitants, Lord Rawdon had reason to apprehend the loss of all his lower posts, unless he should take a position which would support them. He had therefore determined to evacuate Camden, unless the issue of a battle with Greene should be such as to remove all fears of future danger from that officer.

From the energy of this party and the defection of the locals, Lord Rawdon had reason to worry about losing all his lower posts unless he took a position that would help support them. He had therefore decided to evacuate Camden unless the outcome of a battle with Greene was such that it eliminated all fears of future threats from that officer.

Lord Rawdon retires into the lower country.
May 12.

Having failed in his hope of bringing on a general engagement, he evacuated Camden, and marched down the river on its north side to Neilson's ferry. Among the objects to be obtained by this movement was the security of the garrison at Motte's house. But the siege of that place had been so vigorously prosecuted that, on crossing the river, his lordship received the unwelcome intelligence that it had surrendered on the twelfth, and that its garrison, consisting of one hundred and sixty-five men, had become prisoners. On the preceding day, the post at Orangeburg had surrendered to Sumpter.

Having failed in his hope of engaging in a full battle, he evacuated Camden and marched down the north side of the river to Neilson's ferry. One of the goals of this movement was to secure the garrison at Motte's house. However, the siege of that location had been so aggressively pursued that, upon crossing the river, he received the unfortunate news that it had surrendered on the twelfth, and its garrison of one hundred sixty-five men had become prisoners. The day before, the post at Orangeburg had surrendered to Sumpter.

On the evening of the fourteenth, Lord Rawdon moved from Neilson's ferry, and marched to Monk's Corner, a position which enabled him to cover those districts from which Charleston drew its supplies.

On the evening of the fourteenth, Lord Rawdon left Neilson's ferry and marched to Monk's Corner, a position that allowed him to oversee the areas from which Charleston got its supplies.

May.

While the British army was thus under the necessity of retiring, the American force was exerted with a degree of activity which could not be surpassed. After the post at Motte's house had fallen, Marion proceeded against Georgetown, on the Black river, which place he reduced; and Lee marched against fort Granby, a post on the south of the Congaree, which was garrisoned by three hundred and fifty-two men, principally militia. The place was invested on the evening of the fourteenth, and the garrison capitulated the next morning.

While the British army had to retreat, the American forces were incredibly active. After they captured Motte's house, Marion moved toward Georgetown on the Black River and took control of the area. Meanwhile, Lee marched toward Fort Granby, located south of the Congaree, which was held by three hundred fifty-two men, mostly militia. The fort was surrounded on the evening of the fourteenth, and the garrison surrendered the following morning.

The late movement of the British army had left the garrison of Ninety Six and of Augusta exposed to the whole force of Greene, and he determined to direct his operations against them. Lee was ordered to proceed against the latter, while the general should march in person to the former.

The recent movements of the British army had left the garrisons at Ninety Six and Augusta vulnerable to Greene's entire force, and he decided to focus his efforts on them. Lee was instructed to head towards Augusta, while the general would go personally to Ninety Six.

The post at Ninety Six was fortified. The principal work, which, from its form, was called the Star, and which was on the right of the village, consisted of sixteen salient and reentering angles, and was surrounded by a dry ditch, fraize, and abattis. On the left was a valley, through which ran a rivulet that supplied the place with water. This valley was commanded on one side by the town prison, which had been converted into a block-house, and on the other by a stockade fort, in which a block-house had been erected. The garrison, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Cruger, was ample for the extent of the place, but was furnished with only three pieces of artillery.

The post at Ninety Six was fortified. The main structure, known as the Star due to its shape and located on the right side of the village, featured sixteen protruding and recessed angles and was surrounded by a dry ditch, wooden spikes, and a barricade. On the left was a valley with a stream running through it, providing water to the site. This valley was overlooked by the town prison, which had been turned into a blockhouse, and on the other side was a stockade fort that also included a blockhouse. The garrison, led by Lieutenant Colonel Cruger, was sufficient for the size of the post but was equipped with only three cannons.

On evacuating Camden, Lord Rawdon had given directions that the garrison of Ninety Six should retire to Augusta; but his messengers were intercepted; and Cruger, remaining without orders, determined to put his post in the best possible state of defence.

On leaving Camden, Lord Rawdon had instructed that the garrison of Ninety Six should withdraw to Augusta; however, his messages were intercepted, and Cruger, not receiving any orders, decided to prepare his position for the best possible defense.

Greene invests Ninety Six.

On the 22nd of May the American army, consisting of about one thousand continental troops, appeared before the town, and encamped in a wood, within cannon shot of the place. On the following night they broke ground, within seventy yards of the British works; but the besieged having mounted several guns in the star, made a vigorous sally under their protection, and drove the advanced party of the besiegers from their trenches, put several of them to the bayonet, and brought off their intrenching tools.

On May 22nd, the American army, made up of about a thousand Continental soldiers, showed up in front of the town and set up camp in a nearby woods, within cannon range of the location. The next night, they started digging in, just seventy yards from the British defenses; however, the besieged troops, having set up several cannons in the star, launched a strong counterattack under their cover, forcing the front-line attackers to retreat from their trenches, stabbing several with bayonets, and capturing their digging tools.

This sortie was made with such rapidity, that, though General Greene put his whole army in motion, the party making it had accomplished the object and retired into the fort, before he could support his troops in the trenches. After this check, the siege was conducted with more caution, but with indefatigable industry.

This attack happened so quickly that even though General Greene mobilized his entire army, the group that conducted it completed their mission and retreated into the fort before he could reinforce his troops in the trenches. Following this setback, the siege was carried out more carefully, but with tireless effort.

On the 8th of June, Lee rejoined the army with the troops under his command.

On June 8th, Lee rejoined the army with the troops he was leading.

The day after the fall of fort Granby, that active officer proceeded with great celerity to join General Pickens, and lay siege to Augusta. On the march, he took possession of fort Golphin, on the northern bank of the Savannah, which surrendered on the 21st of May; immediately after which the operations against Augusta were commenced.

The day after the fall of Fort Granby, that energetic officer quickly moved to join General Pickens and laid siege to Augusta. During the march, he took control of Fort Golphin, located on the northern bank of the Savannah, which surrendered on May 21st; right after that, the operations against Augusta began.

The place was bravely defended by Lieutenant Colonel Brown; but the approaches of the besiegers were so well conducted, that on the 5th of June he was reduced to the necessity of capitulating; and the prisoners, amounting to about three hundred, were conducted by Lee to the main army.

The place was courageously defended by Lieutenant Colonel Brown; but the attackers were so skilled in their approach that on June 5th he had no choice but to surrender; the prisoners, numbering around three hundred, were taken by Lee to the main army.

This reinforcement enabled General Greene, who had till then made his approaches solely against the star, to commence operations against the works on the left also. The direction of the advances to be made in that quarter was entrusted to Lieutenant Colonel Lee. While the besiegers urged their approaches in the confidence that the place must soon capitulate, Lord Rawdon received a reinforcement which enabled him once more to overrun the state of South Carolina.

This reinforcement allowed General Greene, who had been focusing solely on the star, to also start operations against the defenses on the left. The task of advancing in that area was given to Lieutenant Colonel Lee. While the besiegers pressed forward, believing the place would soon surrender, Lord Rawdon received a reinforcement that enabled him to overtake South Carolina once again.

June 7.

On the third of June three regiments arrived from Ireland; and, on the seventh of that month, Lord Rawdon marched at the head of two thousand men to the relief of Ninety Six. Greene received intelligence of his approach on the eleventh, and ordered Sumpter, to whose aid the cavalry was detached, to continue in his front, and to impede his march by turning to the best account every advantage afforded by the face of the country. But Lord Rawdon passed Sumpter below the junction of the Saluda and Broad rivers, after which that officer was probably unable to regain his front.

On June third, three regiments arrived from Ireland; and on the seventh, Lord Rawdon led two thousand men to help Ninety Six. Greene got word of his approach on the eleventh and ordered Sumpter, to whom the cavalry was assigned, to stay in front and use the terrain to hinder his advance as much as possible. However, Lord Rawdon outmaneuvered Sumpter below the confluence of the Saluda and Broad rivers, after which Sumpter likely couldn't get back in front.

Greene had also intended to meet the British and fight them at some distance from Ninety Six, but found it impossible to draw together such aids of militia as would enable him to execute that intention with any prospect of success. The only remaining hope was to press the siege so vigorously as to compel a surrender before Lord Rawdon could arrive.

Greene also planned to meet the British and confront them away from Ninety Six, but he realized he couldn't gather enough militia support to do that successfully. His only remaining hope was to intensify the siege enough to force a surrender before Lord Rawdon could arrive.

June 17.

In the execution of this plan, the garrison was reduced to extremities, when the near approach of his lordship was communicated to Cruger, by a loyalist who passed through the American lines, and extinguished every hope of carrying the place otherwise than by storm. Unwilling to relinquish a prize he was on the point of obtaining, Greene resolved to essay every thing which could promise success; but the works were so strong that it would be madness to assault them, unless a partial attempt to make a lodgement on one of the curtains of the star redoubt, and at the same time to carry the fort on the left, should the first succeed.

In carrying out this plan, the garrison was pushed to their limits when Cruger was informed of his lordship's nearby approach by a loyalist who got through the American lines, completely dashing any hopes of taking the place without a direct assault. Unwilling to give up a prize he was about to secure, Greene decided to try everything that might lead to success; however, the defenses were so formidable that it would be foolish to attack them unless there was a partial attempt to establish a foothold on one of the sides of the star redoubt, while simultaneously taking the fort on the left if the first attempt succeeded.

June 18.
Is repulsed and retires from before that place.

The proper dispositions for this partial assault being made, Lieutenant Colonel Lee, at the head of the legion infantry and Kirkwood's company, was ordered to assault the works on the left of the town; while Lieutenant Colonel Campbell was to lead the first regiment of Maryland, and the first of Virginia, against the star redoubt. The lines of the third parallel were manned, and all the artillery opened on the besieged. About noon the detachments on this service marched cheerfully to the assault. Lee's attack on the left was successful. He forced the works in that quarter and took possession of them. But the resistance on the right was more determined, and Campbell, though equally brave, was less fortunate. Lieutenants Duval of Maryland, and Selden of Virginia, led the forlorn hope, and entered the ditch with great intrepidity; but its depth, and the height of the parapet opposed obstructions which could not be surmounted. After a severe conflict of more than half an hour, during which Lieutenants Duval and Selden were both badly wounded, and nearly all the forlorn hope were either killed or wounded, the assault was relinquished, and the few who remained alive were recalled from the ditch. The next day, Greene raised the siege, and, crossing the Saluda, encamped on Little River. The loss of the besieging army, in killed and wounded, amounted to one hundred and fifty-five men, among the former of whom was Captain Armstrong of Maryland. That of the garrison has been stated at eighty-five.

The proper arrangements for this partial attack were made. Lieutenant Colonel Lee, leading the legion infantry and Kirkwood's company, was ordered to assault the positions on the left side of the town, while Lieutenant Colonel Campbell was to lead the first regiment of Maryland and the first of Virginia against the star redoubt. The lines of the third parallel were manned, and all the artillery opened fire on the besieged. Around noon, the detachments for this mission marched confidently toward the assault. Lee's attack on the left was successful. He overcame the defenses in that area and took control of them. However, the resistance on the right was stronger, and Campbell, though equally courageous, was less fortunate. Lieutenants Duval from Maryland and Selden from Virginia led the desperate charge and entered the ditch with great bravery, but its depth and the height of the parapet created barriers they couldn’t overcome. After a fierce fight lasting more than half an hour, during which Lieutenants Duval and Selden were both seriously wounded, and nearly all of the desperate charge were either killed or injured, the assault was abandoned, and the few who remained alive were pulled back from the ditch. The next day, Greene lifted the siege and, crossing the Saluda, set up camp at Little River. The losses for the besieging army, in terms of killed and wounded, totaled one hundred and fifty-five men, including Captain Armstrong from Maryland among the deceased. The garrison's losses have been reported at eighty-five.

On the morning of the 21st of June, Lord Rawdon arrived at Ninety Six; and, on the evening of the same day, marched in quest of the American army. In the preceding operations of the campaign, he had felt the want of cavalry so severely that, while at Monk's Corner, and in Charleston, he had formed a corps of one hundred and fifty horse.

On the morning of June 21st, Lord Rawdon arrived at Ninety Six; and, on that same evening, set out in search of the American army. During the earlier stages of the campaign, he had felt a significant lack of cavalry, so while at Monk's Corner and in Charleston, he had put together a unit of one hundred and fifty cavalry.

Active movements of the two armies.

Greene, foreseeing that his active adversary would avail himself to the utmost of his superiority, had sent his sick and wounded northward; and, as soon as Rawdon had crossed the Saluda, he retreated towards Virginia. Lord Rawdon pursued him to the Eunora, whence he returned to Ninety Six.

Greene, anticipating that his proactive opponent would take full advantage of his upper hand, had sent his sick and wounded north. As soon as Rawdon crossed the Saluda, he retreated toward Virginia. Lord Rawdon chased him to the Eunora, after which he returned to Ninety-Six.

The retreat ceased with the pursuit. General Greene halted near the cross roads, on the north of Broad River.

The retreat stopped once the chase ended. General Greene stopped near the crossroads, north of Broad River.

As Rawdon retired, he was followed close by the legion as far as Ninety Six, at which place he remained but two days. Still retaining the opinion that circumstances required him to contract his posts, he left the principal part of his army, under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Cruger, to protect the loyalists while removing within those limits which were to be maintained by the British forces; and, at the head of less than one thousand men, marched in person towards the Congaree.

As Rawdon stepped back, he was closely followed by his troops all the way to Ninety Six, where he stayed for only two days. Believing he needed to tighten his defenses, he left most of his army, led by Lieutenant Colonel Cruger, to protect the loyalists while pulling back within the boundaries set for the British forces. With less than one thousand men, he personally marched toward the Congaree.

Supposing that his adversary intended to preserve the post at Ninety Six, where the royalists were numerous, and to establish one or two on the Congaree, where provisions were more plentiful than in any other part of the state, Greene determined to interrupt the execution of the plan which he believed to have been formed. Leaving his sick and baggage at Wynnsborough, to be conducted to Camden, he marched with the utmost expedition for Friday's ferry on the Congaree, at which place Lord Rawdon had arrived two days before him. As Greene drew near to his enemy, a detachment from the legion under the command of Captain Eggleston, announced his approach by attacking a foraging party within a mile of the British camp, and bringing off a troop consisting of forty-five men, with their officers and horses. Rawdon retreated the next day to Orangeburg, where he formed a junction with a detachment from Charleston, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Stuart.

Assuming that his opponent wanted to hold the position at Ninety Six, where there were many loyalists, and to set up one or two posts on the Congaree, where there were more supplies than anywhere else in the state, Greene decided to disrupt the plan he thought was in place. Leaving his sick and baggage in Wynnsborough to be taken to Camden, he hurried to Friday's ferry on the Congaree, where Lord Rawdon had arrived two days earlier. As Greene got closer to his enemy, a unit from the legion led by Captain Eggleston announced his arrival by attacking a foraging party about a mile from the British camp, capturing a unit of forty-five men along with their officers and horses. Rawdon retreated the next day to Orangeburg, where he joined forces with a unit from Charleston, led by Lieutenant Colonel Stuart.

July 11.

On the Congaree, Greene was reinforced by Sumpter and Marion with about one thousand men; and, on the 11th of July, marched towards Orangeburg with the intention of attacking the British army at that place. He arrived there the next day, but found it so strongly posted as to be unassailable. He offered battle, but prudence restrained him from attacking the enemy in his camp.

On the Congaree, Greene was joined by Sumpter and Marion with about a thousand men; on July 11th, they marched toward Orangeburg, planning to attack the British army there. He got there the next day but found it too well-defended to be attacked. He offered to fight, but common sense held him back from attacking the enemy in their camp.

July 13.

At this place, intelligence was received of the evacuation of Ninety Six, and that Lieutenant Colonel Cruger was marching down to Orangeburg. The north branch of the Edisto, which, for thirty miles, was passable only at the place occupied by Rawdon, interposed an insuperable obstacle to any attempt on Cruger; and Greene thought it most adviseable to force the British out of the upper country by threatening their lower posts at Monk's corner and at Dorchester. Sumpter, Marion, and Lee, were detached on this service; and, on the same day, Greene moved towards the high hills of Santee, a healthy situation, where he purposed to give some refreshment and repose to his harassed army, and where he hoped to be joined by a few continental troops and militia from North Carolina.

At this location, news came about the evacuation of Ninety Six, and that Lieutenant Colonel Cruger was heading down to Orangeburg. The north branch of the Edisto, which was only passable for thirty miles at the spot held by Rawdon, posed a significant barrier to any action against Cruger; and Greene thought it was best to push the British out of the upper region by threatening their lower bases at Monk's Corner and Dorchester. Sumpter, Marion, and Lee were assigned to this task; and on the same day, Greene moved towards the high hills of Santee, a healthy area where he planned to give some rest and recovery to his weary army, and where he hoped to be joined by a few Continental troops and militia from North Carolina.

The detachments ordered against the posts in the north-eastern parts of the state, under the command of Sumpter, were not so completely successful as their numbers, courage, and enterprise deserved. The several corps took distinct routes, intending to fall on the different posts between Ashley and Cooper rivers, at the same time. That at Dorchester was broken up, on the approach of Lee, who captured horses, military stores, and baggage to a considerable amount, and obtained some trivial successes over the flying enemy. Lieutenant Colonel Wade Hampton, of the state cavalry, fell in with a body of mounted refugees, dispersed the whole, and made forty or fifty prisoners.

The detachments sent against the posts in the northeastern parts of the state, led by Sumpter, weren’t as completely successful as their numbers, bravery, and initiative deserved. The various units took different routes, planning to strike the different posts between the Ashley and Cooper rivers simultaneously. The one at Dorchester was dismantled when Lee approached, capturing a significant amount of horses, military supplies, and baggage, along with a few minor victories over the retreating enemy. Lieutenant Colonel Wade Hampton, of the state cavalry, encountered a group of mounted refugees, scattered them entirely, and captured forty to fifty prisoners.

Sumpter advanced against Monk's corner. This post was defended by Lieutenant Colonel Coates with the 19th British regiment, and a troop of horse. He had taken possession of a brick church at a bridge over Biggin creek, the most northern of the water courses which form the west branch of Cooper river. After passing Biggin, the road to Charleston crosses first Wattoo, and then Quinby creek; neither of which is passable except at the bridges over which the road leads, and at a ferry over Quinby.

Sumpter moved toward Monk's corner. This spot was defended by Lieutenant Colonel Coates with the 19th British regiment and a troop of cavalry. He had occupied a brick church at a bridge over Biggin Creek, the northernmost of the waterways that make up the west branch of the Cooper River. After crossing Biggin, the road to Charleston first crosses Wattoo and then Quinby Creek; neither of which can be crossed except at the bridges where the road goes and at a ferry over Quinby.

On the sixteenth, Sumpter approached Monk's corner, but, not supposing himself strong enough to hazard an attack until all his detachments should be collected, sent a party to seize the bridge over Wattoo, and either to hold or to destroy it. This party being attacked by a superior force, retired from the bridge without completing its destruction, and without informing Sumpter that his orders had not been fully executed.

On the sixteenth, Sumpter got close to Monk's Corner, but thinking he wasn't strong enough to risk an attack until all his units were gathered, he sent a group to take control of the bridge over Wattoo, either to hold it or destroy it. This group was attacked by a larger force and pulled back from the bridge without finishing the destruction and without letting Sumpter know that his orders hadn’t been fully carried out.

Marion had joined Sumpter. Lee arrived late in the evening, and the resolution was taken to attack Coates early next morning.

Marion had joined Sumpter. Lee showed up late in the evening, and the plan was made to attack Coates early the next morning.

In the course of the night he set fire to the church, in order to destroy the stores which were collected in it, and commenced his march to Charleston, by the road east of Cooper. Having repaired the bridge over Wattoo, he met with no obstruction; and proceeded with his infantry on the road leading to Quinby bridge, directed his cavalry to take a road turning to the right, and crossing the creek at the ferry.

During the night, he set fire to the church to destroy the supplies stored inside and began his march to Charleston via the road east of Cooper. After fixing the bridge over Wattoo, he faced no obstacles and moved his infantry along the road to Quinby bridge, while directing his cavalry to take a right turn and cross the creek at the ferry.

About three next morning, the flames bursting through the roof of the church announced the retreat of the British; and the pursuit was immediately commenced. Sumpter was preceded by the legion, supported by the state cavalry. A detachment from this regiment followed the British horse, in the vain hope of overtaking the troop at the ferry, while Lee pursued the infantry. Within a short distance of the bridge, which is eighteen miles from Monk's corner, he perceived the rear guard of the British, consisting of about one hundred men, commanded by Captain Campbell, which the cavalry charged, sword in hand. They threw down their arms, and begged for quarter; upon which they were placed under the care of a few militia horsemen, and the American cavalry resumed the pursuit.

About three in the morning, flames shooting through the roof of the church signaled the retreat of the British, and the chase began immediately. Sumpter was ahead of the legion, backed by the state cavalry. A group from this regiment followed the British cavalry, hoping to catch up with them at the ferry, while Lee pursued the infantry. Not far from the bridge, which is eighteen miles from Monk's Corner, he spotted the British rear guard, made up of about one hundred men led by Captain Campbell. The cavalry charged with swords drawn. The British soldiers dropped their weapons and asked for mercy; they were then put under the watch of a few militia horsemen, and the American cavalry continued their pursuit.

They had not proceeded far, when Lee was called to the rear, by information that the prisoners had been ordered to resume their arms. At this critical moment, Armstrong, at the head of the leading section, came in sight of Coates, who having passed the bridge, and loosened the planks, lay, unapprehensive of danger, intending to destroy it as soon as his rear guard should cross the creek. Armstrong, in obedience to orders, given in the expectation that he would overtake Coates before passing the creek, dashed over the bridge on the guard stationed at the opposite end with a howitzer, which he seized. In this operation, his horses threw off some of the loosened planks, and made a chasm, over which the following section, led by Lieutenant Carrington, leaped with difficulty. In doing this some other planks were thrown off, and the horses of the third section refused to take the leap. At this time Lee came up, and every effort was made to replace the planks, but without success. The creek was too deep and miry to afford foot hold to those who attempted to raise them from the water.

They hadn't gone far when Lee was called to the back, having learned that the prisoners were ordered to pick up their weapons again. At this critical moment, Armstrong, leading the first section, spotted Coates, who had crossed the bridge and loosened the planks. Coates, unaware of the danger, planned to destroy the bridge as soon as his rear guard crossed the creek. Armstrong, following orders given in the hope that he would catch up to Coates before reaching the creek, rushed over the bridge to the guard stationed at the other end with a howitzer, which he captured. During this, his horses knocked off some of the loose planks, creating a gap that the next section, led by Lieutenant Carrington, had to jump over with difficulty. In the process, more planks were dislodged, and the horses of the third section refused to jump. At that moment, Lee arrived, and every effort was made to replace the planks, but it was unsuccessful. The creek was too deep and muddy to give a foothold to those trying to lift them from the water.

This halt revived the courage of the British soldiers, who returned to the support of their commander, then engaged in an equal conflict with the cavalry who had passed the bridge. These gallant men[4] finding themselves overpowered by numbers, and that their comrades could not support them, pressed over the causeway, and wheeling into the woods, made their escape.

This pause boosted the bravery of the British soldiers, who rallied to support their commander and engaged in a fair fight with the cavalry that had crossed the bridge. These brave men[4] realizing they were outnumbered and that their comrades couldn't back them up, rushed over the causeway and turned into the woods to escape.

After finding the impracticability of replacing the planks on the bridge, in attempting which, Doctor Irvin, surgeon of the legion cavalry, and several of the troopers were wounded, Lee withdrew from the contest, and moved some distance up the creek, to a ford where he was soon joined by the infantry of the legion.

After realizing that replacing the planks on the bridge wasn’t feasible, an effort that left Doctor Irvin, the legion cavalry's surgeon, and several troopers injured, Lee pulled back from the fight and moved a bit upstream to a ford, where he was quickly joined by the legion's infantry.

Coates then completed the demolition of the bridge, and retired to an adjoining plantation, where he took possession of the dwelling house and out buildings that surrounded it.

Coates then finished tearing down the bridge and moved to a nearby plantation, where he took over the house and the surrounding buildings.

As the Americans were obliged to make a considerable circuit, Sumpter, who unfortunately left his artillery behind, did not arrive on the ground till three in the afternoon, and at four the house was attacked. The fire was kept up chiefly by Marion's division, from a fence near the house, till evening, when the ammunition was exhausted, and the troops were called off. In the course of the night, it was perceived that the loss had fallen almost entirely on Marion. Great discontent prevailed, and many of the men left him. The infection was communicated to Sumpter's troops, and there being reason to fear the approach of Lord Rawdon, the enterprise was abandoned. Sumpter crossed the Santee; and the legion rejoined the army, then encamped at the high hills of that river.

As the Americans had to take a long detour, Sumpter, who unfortunately left his artillery behind, didn’t arrive at the site until three in the afternoon, and the house was attacked at four. The fire was mainly sustained by Marion's division from a fence near the house until evening when the ammunition ran out, and the troops were pulled back. During the night, it became clear that most of the losses were suffered by Marion. There was widespread discontent, and many of the men abandoned him. This feeling spread to Sumpter's troops, and since there was concern about Lord Rawdon approaching, the mission was called off. Sumpter crossed the Santee, and the legion rejoined the army, which was then camped at the high hills of that river.

The intense heat of this sultry season demanded some relaxation from the unremitting toils which the southern army had encountered. From the month of January, it had been engaged in one course of incessant fatigue, and of hardy enterprise. All its powers had been strained, nor had any interval been allowed to refresh and recruit the almost exhausted strength and spirits of the troops.

The scorching heat of this sweltering season required some downtime from the relentless struggles faced by the southern army. Since January, they had been involved in a nonstop cycle of hard work and daring efforts. All their resources had been stretched thin, and there had been no break to restore the nearly depleted strength and morale of the soldiers.

The continued labours and exertions of all were highly meritorious; but the successful activity of one corps will attract particular attention. The legion, from its structure, was peculiarly adapted to the partisan war of the southern states; and, by being detached against the weaker posts of the enemy, had opportunities for displaying with advantage all the energies it possessed. In that extensive sweep which it made from the Santee to Augusta, which employed from the 15th of April to the 5th of June, this corps, acting in conjunction, first with Marion, afterwards with Pickens, and sometimes alone, had constituted an essential part of the force which carried five British posts, and made upwards of eleven hundred prisoners. Its leader, in the performance of these services, displayed a mind of so much fertility of invention and military resource, as to add greatly to his previous reputation as a partisan.

The ongoing efforts and hard work of everyone were commendable; however, the impressive performance of one group will stand out. The legion, due to its structure, was especially suited for the guerrilla warfare in the southern states, and by being deployed against the enemy's weaker positions, it had the chance to showcase its full capabilities. During its extensive campaign from the Santee to Augusta, which took place from April 15 to June 5, this group operated alongside Marion, then Pickens, and sometimes on its own, playing a crucial role in capturing five British positions and taking over eleven hundred prisoners. Its leader, in carrying out these tasks, showed such creativity and military skill that it significantly enhanced his already established reputation as a guerrilla leader.

The whole army had exhibited a degree of activity, courage, and patient suffering, surpassing any expectation that could have been formed of troops composed chiefly of new levies; and its general had manifested great firmness, enterprise, prudence, and skill.

The entire army showed a level of energy, bravery, and resilience that exceeded any expectations we might have had for troops mostly made up of new recruits. Its general displayed remarkable determination, initiative, caution, and expertise.

The suffering sustained in this ardent struggle for the southern states was not confined to the armies. The inhabitants of the country felt all the miseries which are inflicted by war in its most savage form. Being almost equally divided between the two contending parties, reciprocal injuries had gradually sharpened their resentments against each other, and had armed neighbour against neighbour, until it became a war of extermination. As the parties alternately triumphed, opportunities were alternately given for the exercise of their vindictive passions. They derived additional virulence from the examples occasionally afforded by the commanders of the British forces. After overrunning Georgia and South Carolina, they seem to have considered those states as completely reannexed to the British empire; and they manifested a disposition to treat those as rebels, who had once submitted and again taken up arms, although the temporary ascendency of the continental troops should have induced the measure. One of these executions, that of Colonel Hayne, took place on the third of August, while Lord Rawdon[5] was in Charleston, preparing to sail for Europe. The American army being at this time in possession of great part of the country, the punishment inflicted on this gentleman was taken up very seriously by General Greene, and was near producing a system of retaliation. The British officers, pursuing this policy, are stated to have executed several of the zealous partisans of the revolution who fell into their hands. These examples had unquestionably some influence in unbridling the revengeful passions of the royalists, and letting loose the spirit of slaughter which was brooding in their bosoms. The disposition to retaliate to the full extent of their power, if not to commit original injury, was equally strong in the opposite party. When fort Granby surrendered, the militia attached to the legion manifested so strong a disposition to break the capitulation, and to murder the most obnoxious among the prisoners who were inhabitants of the country, as to produce a solemn declaration from General Greene, that any man guilty of so atrocious an act should be executed. When fort Cornwallis surrendered, no exertions could have saved Colonel Brown, had he not been sent to Savannah protected by a guard of continental troops. Lieutenant Colonel Grierson, of the royal militia, was shot by unknown marksmen; and, although a reward of one hundred guineas was offered to any person who would inform against the perpetrator of the crime, he could never be discovered. "The whole country," said General Greene in one of his letters, "is one continued scene of blood and slaughter."

The suffering experienced in the fierce struggle for the southern states wasn’t limited to just the armies. The local people endured all the hardships that war brings in its most brutal form. With the population almost evenly split between the two opposing sides, mutual injuries intensified their resentments against one another, turning neighbor against neighbor until it became a war of extermination. As the two sides took turns winning, each victory provided opportunities for them to unleash their vengeful feelings. These feelings were further fueled by the actions of British commanders. After overrunning Georgia and South Carolina, they treated those states as if they were fully restored to the British Empire and regarded those who had once submitted and then took up arms again as rebels, despite the temporary dominance of the Continental troops. One notable execution, that of Colonel Hayne, occurred on August 3rd, while Lord Rawdon[5] was in Charleston preparing to sail for Europe. With the American army controlling much of the region at that time, General Greene took the punishment of this gentleman very seriously and nearly instigated a system of retaliation. The British officers, pursuing this strategy, reportedly executed several of the enthusiastic supporters of the revolution who fell into their hands. These actions undoubtedly inflamed the vengeful emotions of the Loyalists, unleashing the desire for slaughter that was simmering within them. The urge to retaliate to the fullest extent, if not to initiate injury, was equally strong within the opposing side. When Fort Granby surrendered, the militia connected to the legion showed such a strong desire to break the terms of surrender and to kill the most hated among the prisoners, who were local residents, that General Greene had to make a formal declaration stating that anyone committing such a horrific act would be executed. When Fort Cornwallis surrendered, Colonel Brown wouldn’t have been saved if he hadn’t been sent to Savannah under guard by Continental troops. Lieutenant Colonel Grierson, of the royal militia, was shot by unknown assailants; despite a reward of one hundred guineas offered for information leading to the culprit, the shooter was never found. "The whole country," General Greene wrote in one of his letters, "is one continuous scene of blood and slaughter."

Greene was too humane, as well as too judicious, not to discourage this exterminating spirit. Perceiving in it the total destruction of the country, he sought to appease it by restraining the excesses of those who were attached to the American cause.

Greene was too compassionate, as well as too wise, not to discourage this destructive attitude. Seeing that it would lead to the total ruin of the country, he tried to calm it down by moderating the actions of those who were loyal to the American cause.

At the high hills of Santee the reinforcements expected from North Carolina were received. The American army, counting every person belonging to it, was augmented to two thousand six hundred men; but its effective force did not exceed sixteen hundred.

At the high hills of Santee, the reinforcements expected from North Carolina arrived. The American army, including everyone attached to it, grew to two thousand six hundred men; however, its effective force did not exceed sixteen hundred.

Active movements of the two armies.

After the retreat of General Greene from Orangeburg, Lord Rawdon was induced by ill health to avail himself of a permit to return to Great Britain, and the command of the British forces in South Carolina devolved on Lieutenant Colonel Stuart. He again advanced to the Congaree; and encamping near its junction with the Wateree, manifested a determination to establish a permanent post at that place. Though the two armies were within sixteen miles of each other on a right line, two rivers ran between them which could not be crossed without making a circuit of seventy miles; in consequence of which Lieutenant Colonel Stuart felt himself so secure, that his foraging parties were spread over the country. To restrain them, and to protect the inhabitants, General Greene detached Marion towards Combahee ferry, and Washington over the Wateree. Frequent skirmishes ensued, which, from the superior courage and activity of the American cavalry, uniformly terminated in their favour.

After General Greene pulled back from Orangeburg, Lord Rawdon had to head back to Great Britain due to health issues, and the command of the British forces in South Carolina went to Lieutenant Colonel Stuart. He moved forward to the Congaree and set up camp near its confluence with the Wateree, showing his intent to establish a permanent base there. Even though the two armies were only sixteen miles apart in a straight line, two rivers separated them, which could only be crossed by making a seventy-mile detour. Because of this, Lieutenant Colonel Stuart felt quite secure and spread his foraging parties across the countryside. To stop them and protect the local residents, General Greene sent Marion towards Combahee ferry and Washington over the Wateree. Frequent skirmishes occurred, and thanks to the bravery and quickness of the American cavalry, they consistently ended in their favor.

Finding that Lieutenant Colonel Stuart designed to maintain his important position on the Congaree, Greene prepared to recommence active operations. Breaking up his camp at the high hills of Santee, he crossed the Wateree near Camden, and marched towards Friday's ferry.

Finding that Lieutenant Colonel Stuart intended to hold his important position on the Congaree, Greene got ready to start active operations again. He broke up his camp at the high hills of Santee, crossed the Wateree near Camden, and marched toward Friday's ferry.

After a short repose, they resume active operations.

On being informed of his approach, the British army retired to Eutaw, where it was reinforced by a detachment from Charleston. Greene followed by slow and easy marches, for the double purpose of preserving his soldiers from the effects of fatigue under a hot sun, and of giving Marion, who was returning from a critical expedition to the Edisto, time to rejoin him. In the afternoon of the seventh that officer arrived; and it was determined to attack the British camp next day.

On hearing about his approach, the British army withdrew to Eutaw, where they received reinforcements from Charleston. Greene moved slowly and steadily, aiming to protect his soldiers from exhaustion in the heat and to give Marion, who was coming back from a crucial mission to the Edisto, time to rejoin him. On the afternoon of the seventh, that officer arrived, and they decided to attack the British camp the following day.

September 8.
Battle of Eutaw.

At four in the morning of the eighth, the American army moved from its ground, which was seven miles from Eutaw, in the following order: The legion of Lee and the state troops of South Carolina formed the advance. The militia moved next, and were followed by the regulars. The cavalry of Washington and the infantry of Kirkwood brought up the rear. The artillery moved between the columns.

At four in the morning on the eighth, the American army left its position, which was seven miles from Eutaw, in this order: The legion of Lee and the South Carolina state troops led the way. The militia followed, and then came the regulars. Washington's cavalry and Kirkwood's infantry brought up the rear. The artillery was positioned between the columns.

At eight in the morning, about four miles from the British camp, the van fell in with a body of horse and foot, who were escorting an unarmed foraging party, and a brisk action ensued. The British were instantly routed. The cavalry made their escape at the sight of the legion dragoons, and the infantry were killed or taken. About forty, including their captain, were made prisoners. The foraging party which followed in the rear saved themselves by flight, on hearing the first musket. Supposing this party to be the van of the English, Greene arranged his army in order of battle.

At eight in the morning, about four miles from the British camp, the van encountered a group of cavalry and infantry who were escorting an unarmed foraging party, leading to a swift skirmish. The British were quickly routed. The cavalry fled at the sight of the legion dragoons, and the infantry were either killed or captured. About forty, including their captain, were taken prisoner. The foraging party that followed behind escaped by running away after hearing the first musket shot. Mistaking this group for the front of the English forces, Greene positioned his army for battle.

The militia, commanded by Generals Marion and Pickens, composed the first line. The second was formed of the continental infantry. The North Carolina brigade, commanded by General Sumner, was placed on the right; the Virginians, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, formed the centre; and the Marylanders, commanded by Colonel Williams, the left. The legion of Lee was to cover the right flank; the state troops of South Carolina, commanded by Colonel Henderson, the left; and the cavalry of Washington, with the infantry of Kirkwood, formed the reserve. Captain Lieutenant Gaines, with two three-pounders, was attached to the first line; and Captain Brown, with two sixes, to the second.

The militia, led by Generals Marion and Pickens, made up the first line. The second line consisted of the continental infantry. The North Carolina brigade, under General Sumner, was positioned on the right; the Virginians, led by Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, were in the center; and the Marylanders, commanded by Colonel Williams, were on the left. Lee's legion was assigned to cover the right flank; South Carolina's state troops, led by Colonel Henderson, took the left; and Washington's cavalry, along with Kirkwood's infantry, formed the reserve. Captain Lieutenant Gaines, with two three-pound cannons, was attached to the first line, while Captain Brown, with two six-pounders, was with the second.

The British line also was immediately formed. It was drawn up across the road, in an oblique direction, in a wood, on the heights near the Eutaw springs, having its right flank on Eutaw creek. This flank was also covered by a battalion commanded by Major Majoribanks, which was posted in a thicket, in a line forming an obtuse angle with the main body. The left flank was protected by the cavalry commanded by Major Coffin, and by a body of infantry held in reserve. A detachment of infantry was pushed forward about a mile, with a field piece to employ the Americans until his arrangements should be completed.

The British line was quickly established. It was set up across the road at an angle, in a wooded area, on the heights near Eutaw Springs, with its right flank along Eutaw Creek. This flank was also backed by a battalion led by Major Majoribanks, which was positioned in a thicket and formed an obtuse angle with the main force. The left flank was secured by cavalry under Major Coffin and a reserve infantry unit. A detachment of infantry was sent forward about a mile, equipped with a field piece to engage the Americans while the rest of the arrangements were finalized.

The American van continuing to move forward, encountered the British advanced party; upon which Captain Lieutenant Gaines came up with his field pieces, which opened on the enemy with considerable effect. General Greene also ordered up his first line with directions to move on briskly, and to advance as they fired. As this line came into action, the legion formed on its right flank, and the state troops of South Carolina on its left.

The American van kept moving forward and ran into the British advanced party. Captain Lieutenant Gaines arrived with his field pieces and opened fire on the enemy with great impact. General Greene also called up his first line, instructing them to move quickly and advance while firing. As this line engaged, the legion formed on its right flank, and the South Carolina state troops positioned on its left.

The British advanced party was soon driven in; and the Americans, continuing to press forward, were engaged with the main body. Lieutenant Colonel Stuart, perceiving the materials of which this line was composed, and probably anticipating its speedy discomfiture, to avoid exposing his flanks to the American cavalry, had directed his troops not to change their position. His design was to meet the American regulars without any alteration of the arrangement originally made. But the militia, many of whom had frequently faced an enemy, being commanded by generals of experience and courage, exhibited a degree of firmness not common to that species of force, and maintained their ground with unexpected obstinacy. In the ardour of action, the order not to advance was disregarded, and the British pressed forward as the militia retired. The artillery which was placed in the road was well served on both sides, and did great execution till both the three-pounders commanded by Captain Lieutenant Gaines were dismounted. About the same time, one of the British shared the same fate.

The British advanced party was soon pushed back, and the Americans, continuing to push forward, engaged with the main force. Lieutenant Colonel Stuart, noticing what this line was made of and likely anticipating its quick defeat, ordered his troops to hold their position to avoid exposing their flanks to the American cavalry. His plan was to face the American regulars without changing the original setup. However, the militia, many of whom had often faced an enemy and were led by experienced and brave generals, displayed a level of determination not typical of that kind of force, holding their ground with surprising stubbornness. In the heat of battle, the order not to advance was ignored, and the British pushed forward as the militia retreated. The artillery placed on the road was effectively used by both sides and caused significant damage until the three-pounders commanded by Captain Lieutenant Gaines were taken down. Around the same time, one of the British met the same fate.

When the militia gave way, Lee and Henderson still maintained the engagement on the flanks, General Sumner was ordered up to fill the place from which Marion and Pickens were receding; and his brigade, ranging itself with the legion infantry, and the state regiment of South Carolina, came into action with great intrepidity. The British, who had advanced upon the militia, fell back to their first ground, upon which Stuart ordered the corps of infantry posted in the rear of his left wing into the line, and directed Major Coffin with his cavalry to guard that flank. About this time Henderson received a wound which disabled him from keeping the field, and the command of his corps devolved on Lieutenant Colonel Hampton.

When the militia retreated, Lee and Henderson continued to engage the enemy on the sides. General Sumner was called in to take the place where Marion and Pickens were pulling back. His brigade joined the legion infantry and the South Carolina state regiment, entering the fight with great bravery. The British, who had advanced on the militia, fell back to their original position. Stuart then ordered the infantry units stationed behind his left wing to take their place in the line and instructed Major Coffin with his cavalry to secure that flank. Around this time, Henderson was wounded and unable to stay on the field, so command of his corps passed to Lieutenant Colonel Hampton.

After sustaining the fire of the enemy with considerable resolution, Sumner's brigade began to give way, and the British rushed forward in some disorder. Greene then directed Williams and Campbell to charge with the bayonet, and at the same time ordered Washington to bring up the reserve, and to act on his left. Williams charged without firing a musket; but the soldiers of Campbell's regiment, being chiefly new levies, returned the fire of the enemy as they advanced. In this critical moment, Lee, perceiving that the American right extended beyond the British left, ordered Captain Rudolph, of the legion infantry, to turn their flank and give them a raking fire. This order was instantly executed with precision and effect. Charged thus both in front and flank, 'the British broke successively on the left, till the example was followed by all that part of the line. The Marylanders under Williams, had already used the bayonet, and before the troops opposed to them gave way, several had fallen on both sides, transfixed with that weapon.

After holding back the enemy's fire with significant determination, Sumner's brigade started to fall back, and the British charged forward in some disarray. Greene then instructed Williams and Campbell to charge with their bayonets, while simultaneously ordering Washington to bring up the reserves and flank him on the left. Williams charged without firing a shot, but the soldiers in Campbell's regiment, mostly new recruits, returned fire as they moved ahead. In this critical moment, Lee noticed that the American right extended past the British left and commanded Captain Rudolph of the legion infantry to flank them and provide a heavy volley of fire. This order was quickly and effectively carried out. Attacked from both the front and the side, the British broke on the left, a trend that spread along that part of the line. The Marylanders under Williams had already engaged with their bayonets, and before the opposing troops gave way, several soldiers on both sides fell, impaled by that weapon.

The British left, when driven off the field, retreated through their encampment towards Eutaw creek, near which stood a three story brick house, surrounded with offices, and connected with a strongly enclosed garden, into which Major Sheridan, in pursuance of orders previously given by Lieutenant Colonel Stuart, threw himself with the New York volunteers. The Americans pursued them closely, and took three hundred prisoners and two pieces of cannon. Unfortunately for their hopes of victory, the refreshments found in camp furnished a temptation too strong to be resisted; and many of the soldiers left their ranks, and, under cover of the tents, seized the spirits and food within their view. The legion infantry, however, pressed the rear so closely as to make a serious struggle to enter the house with the British. The door was forcibly shut in their faces, and several British officers and men were excluded. These were made prisoners, and mixed with the Americans, so as to save them from the fire of the house while retiring from it.

The British retreated through their camp towards Eutaw Creek after being driven off the battlefield. Near the creek was a three-story brick house surrounded by outbuildings and connected to a securely fenced garden. Major Sheridan, following orders from Lieutenant Colonel Stuart, rushed into the garden with the New York volunteers. The Americans pursued closely, capturing three hundred prisoners and two cannons. Unfortunately for their chances of victory, the refreshments found in the camp were too tempting to resist, and many soldiers left their ranks to grab the alcohol and food they could see. However, the legion infantry pressed hard on the rear, making a serious effort to enter the house along with the British. The door was slammed shut in their faces, trapping several British officers and soldiers outside. These individuals were taken prisoner and mixed in with the Americans to protect them from the gunfire coming from the house as they withdrew.

As the British left gave way, Washington was directed to charge their right. He advanced with his accustomed impetuosity, but found it impossible, with cavalry, to penetrate the thicket occupied by Majoribanks. Perceiving an interval between the British right and the creek, he determined to pass through it round their flank and to charge them in the rear. In making the attempt, he received a fire which did immense execution. The British occupied a thicket almost impervious to horse. In attempting to force it, Lieutenant Stuart who commanded the leading section was badly wounded, his horse killed under him, and every man in his section killed or wounded. Captain Watts, the second in command, fell pierced with two balls. Colonel Washington was wounded, and his horse was killed. They fell together; and, before he could extricate himself, he was made a prisoner.

As the British left crumbled, Washington was instructed to charge their right. He moved forward with his usual intensity but found it impossible, with cavalry, to get through the thicket held by Majoribanks. Noticing a gap between the British right and the creek, he decided to slip through it around their flank and attack them from behind. In the process, he came under heavy fire that caused significant damage. The British were entrenched in a thicket that was nearly impossible for horses to navigate. In trying to breach it, Lieutenant Stuart, who led the front section, was seriously injured, his horse shot dead beneath him, and every soldier in his unit was either killed or wounded. Captain Watts, the second in command, was shot with two bullets. Colonel Washington was injured, and his horse was killed. They both went down together, and before he could get free, he was captured.

After nearly all the officers, and a large portion of the men were killed or wounded, the residue of the corps was drawn off by Captain Parsons, assisted by Lieutenant Gordon. Soon after the repulse of Washington, Lieutenant Colonel Hampton and Captain Kirkwood with his infantry, came up and renewed the attack on Majoribanks. Great efforts were made to dislodge him, but they were ineffectual. Finding it impracticable to employ horse to advantage on that ground, Hampton drew off his troops and retired to the road.

After most of the officers and a large number of the soldiers were killed or injured, the remaining troops were pulled back by Captain Parsons, with help from Lieutenant Gordon. Shortly after Washington's setback, Lieutenant Colonel Hampton and Captain Kirkwood with his infantry arrived and launched another attack on Majoribanks. They made significant efforts to dislodge him, but it didn’t work. Realizing it was impractical to use cavalry effectively on that terrain, Hampton withdrew his forces and retreated to the road.

The corps commanded by Sheridan kept up a continual and destructive fire from the house in which they had taken shelter; and Greene ordered up the artillery to batter it. The guns were too light to make a breach in the walls, and, having been brought within the range of the fire from the house, almost every artillerist was killed, and the pieces were abandoned.

The troops led by Sheridan maintained a constant and damaging fire from the house where they had taken cover; and Greene ordered the artillery to attack it. The guns were too light to breach the walls, and as they were moved within range of the fire from the house, nearly every artilleryman was killed, and the cannons were left behind.

The firm stand made by Majoribanks, and the disorder which had taken place among a part of the Americans, gave Stuart an opportunity of rallying his broken regiments, and bringing them again into action. They were formed between the thicket occupied by Majoribanks, and the house in possession of Sheridan.

The strong stance taken by Majoribanks and the chaos that erupted among some of the Americans gave Stuart a chance to regroup his shattered regiments and get them back into action. They were positioned between the thicket held by Majoribanks and the house owned by Sheridan.

Major Coffin, who had repulsed the legion cavalry about the time the British infantry was driven off the field, still maintained a formidable position on their left; and no exertions could dislodge Majoribanks or Sheridan from the cover under which they fought. Perceiving that the contest was maintained on ground, and under circumstances extremely disadvantageous to the Americans, Greene withdrew them a small distance, and formed them again in the wood in which the battle had been fought. Thinking it unadviseable to renew the desperate attempt which had just failed, he collected his wounded, and retired with his prisoners to the ground from which he had marched in the morning, determined again to fight the British army when it should retreat from the Eutaws.

Major Coffin, who had pushed back the legion cavalry around the same time the British infantry was forced off the field, still held a strong position on their left; and no efforts could move Majoribanks or Sheridan from their cover where they were fighting. Realizing that the battle was taking place on ground and under conditions that were extremely unfavorable for the Americans, Greene pulled them back a short distance and regrouped them in the woods where the fight had occurred. Deciding it wasn’t wise to try the desperate move that had just failed, he gathered his wounded and retreated with his prisoners to the spot from which he had started in the morning, resolved to face the British army again when they retreated from the Eutaws.

Every corps engaged in this hard fought battle received the applause of the general. Almost every officer whose situation enabled him to attract notice was named with distinction. "Never," he said, "was artillery better served;" but, "he thought himself principally indebted for the victory he had gained, to the free use made of the bayonet by the Virginians and Marylanders, and by the infantry of the legion and of Kirkwood." To Colonel Williams he acknowledged himself to be particularly indebted. He gave that praise too to the valour of his enemy which it merited. "They really fought," he said, "with courage worthy a better cause."

Every corps involved in this hard-fought battle received the general's praise. Almost every officer who could be noticed was recognized with distinction. "Never," he said, "was artillery better used;" however, "he believed he owed the victory primarily to the effective use of the bayonet by the Virginians and Marylanders, as well as the infantry of the legion and Kirkwood." He specifically noted his gratitude to Colonel Williams. He also acknowledged the bravery of his enemies, saying they "really fought with a courage deserving of a better cause."

The loss on both sides bore a great proportion to the numbers engaged. That of the Americans was five hundred and fifty-five, including sixty officers. One hundred and thirty were killed on the spot. Seventeen commissioned officers were killed, and four mortally wounded. "This loss of officers," said their general, "is still more heavy on account of their value than their numbers."

The loss on both sides was significant compared to the number of people involved. The Americans lost five hundred fifty-five, including sixty officers. One hundred thirty were killed right away. Seventeen commissioned officers were killed, and four were mortally wounded. "This loss of officers," said their general, "is even more serious because of their importance than their numbers."

Among the slain was Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who received a mortal wound while leading the Virginia brigade to that bold and decisive charge which broke the adverse line.

Among the fallen was Lieutenant Colonel Campbell, who suffered a fatal wound while leading the Virginia brigade in that daring and decisive charge that shattered the enemy line.

The loss of the British army was stated by themselves at six hundred and ninety-three men, of whom only eighty-five were killed in the field. If this statement be correct,[6] the American dead greatly exceeded that of the adversary, which was probably the fact, as the carnage of the former, during their unavailing efforts to dislodge the latter from the house and strong adjoining ground, was immense.

The British army reported their losses as six hundred and ninety-three men, with only eighty-five killed in action. If this is accurate,[6] then the American casualties were likely much higher, which probably was the case, as the slaughter of the Americans during their fruitless attempts to drive the British out of the house and the surrounding stronghold was massive.

Each party had pretensions to the victory, and each claimed the merit of having gained it with inferior numbers. The truth probably is that their numbers were nearly equal.

Each side believed they were going to win and each claimed they achieved it with fewer people. The reality is that their numbers were probably about the same.

Nor can the claim of either to the victory be pronounced unequivocal. Unconnected with its consequences, the fortune of the day was nearly balanced. But if the consequences be taken into the account, the victory unquestionably belonged to Greene. The result of this, as of the two preceding battles fought by him in the Carolinas, was the expulsion of the hostile army from the territory which was the immediate object of contest.

Nor can we say that either side clearly won the victory. Ignoring the aftermath, the outcome of the day was almost even. However, when we consider the aftermath, the victory definitely went to Greene. As a result of this, along with the two previous battles he fought in the Carolinas, the hostile army was driven out of the territory that was the main focus of the conflict.

Four six-pounders, two of which had been taken in the early part of the day, were brought to play upon the house, and, being pushed so near as to be within the command of its fire, were unavoidably abandoned; but a three-pounder which had been also taken, was brought off by Captain Lieutenant Gaines, whose conduct was mentioned with distinction by General Greene. Thus the trophies of victory were divided.

Four six-pound cannons, two of which had been captured earlier in the day, were positioned to fire at the house. They were pushed in so close that they fell within the range of the house's fire and had to be abandoned. However, a three-pound cannon that had also been captured was successfully taken away by Captain Lieutenant Gaines, whose actions were specifically praised by General Greene. Thus, the spoils of victory were shared.

The thanks of congress were voted to every corps in the army; and a resolution was passed for "presenting to Major General Greene, as an honourable testimony of his merit, a British standard, and a golden medal, emblematic of the battle and of his victory."

The thanks of Congress were given to every corps in the army, and a resolution was passed to "present Major General Greene, as a mark of his merit, a British standard and a gold medal, representing the battle and his victory."

September 9.

On the day succeeding the action, Lieutenant Colonel Stuart marched from Eutaw to meet Major M'Arthur, who was conducting a body of troops from Charleston. The junction was effected about fourteen miles from Eutaw; and this movement saved M'Arthur from Marion and Lee, who had been detached on the morning of the same day to intercept any reinforcement which might be coming from below. Stuart continued his retreat to Monk's corner, to which place he was followed by Greene, who, on finding that the numbers and position of the British army were such as to render an attack unadviseable, returned to the high hills of Santee.

On the day after the battle, Lieutenant Colonel Stuart marched from Eutaw to meet Major M'Arthur, who was leading a group of troops from Charleston. They met about fourteen miles from Eutaw; this move saved M'Arthur from Marion and Lee, who had been sent out that morning to block any reinforcements coming from below. Stuart continued his retreat to Monk's Corner, where he was followed by Greene, who, upon realizing that the size and position of the British army made an attack unwise, returned to the high hills of Santee.

The ravages of disease were added to the loss sustained in battle, and the army remained for some time in too feeble a condition for active enterprise.

The impact of disease was added to the losses faced in battle, and the army stayed in a weakened state for some time, not ready for any active undertakings.

Nov. 18.

The capitulation at Yorktown was soon followed by the evacuation of Wilmington, in North Carolina, and the British seemed to limit their views in the south to the country adjacent to the sea coast. As the cool season approached, the diseases of the American army abated; and Greene, desirous of partaking in the abundance of the lower country, marched from the high hills of Santee towards the Four Holes, a branch of the Edisto. Nov. 28.Leaving the army to be conducted by Colonel Williams, he proceeded in person at the head of his cavalry, supported by about two hundred infantry, towards the British posts at Dorchester, where six hundred and fifty regular troops and two hundred royal militia were understood to be stationed.

The surrender at Yorktown was quickly followed by the evacuation of Wilmington in North Carolina, and the British seemed to restrict their focus in the south to the areas near the coast. As the cooler season set in, the sickness within the American army decreased; and Greene, eager to share in the resources of the lower country, marched from the high hills of Santee toward the Four Holes, a branch of the Edisto. Nov. 28Leaving the army under the command of Colonel Williams, he personally led his cavalry, backed by about two hundred infantry, toward the British posts at Dorchester, where it was believed there were six hundred and fifty regular troops and two hundred royal militia stationed.

The British army retires towards Charleston.

Though his march was conducted with the utmost secrecy, the country through which he passed contained so many disaffected, that it was impossible to conceal this movement; and intelligence of his approach was communicated to the officer commanding in Dorchester, the night before he reached that place. The advance, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Hampton, met a small party, which he instantly charged, and, after killing and taking several, drove the residue over the bridge under cover of their works. In the course of the following night, the stores at Dorchester were burnt, and the garrison retired to the Quarter House, where their principal force was encamped. Greene returned to the army at the Round O, at which place he purposed to await the arrival of the reinforcements marching from the north under the command of General St. Clair. In the mean time, General Marion and Lieutenant Colonel Lee were stationed on each side of Ashley, so as to cover the country between the Cooper and the Edisto; thus confining the influence of the British arms to Charleston neck, and the adjacent islands.[7]

Though his march was carried out with the utmost secrecy, the area he traveled through had so many unhappy individuals that it was impossible to keep this movement under wraps; news of his approach was sent to the officer in charge at Dorchester the night before he arrived there. The advance, led by Lieutenant Colonel Hampton, encountered a small group that he immediately charged, and after killing and capturing several, pushed the rest across the bridge under the protection of their fortifications. Later that night, the supplies at Dorchester were destroyed, and the garrison moved to the Quarter House, where their main force was stationed. Greene returned to the army at the Round O, where he planned to wait for the reinforcements coming from the north under General St. Clair's command. In the meantime, General Marion and Lieutenant Colonel Lee were positioned on either side of the Ashley River to secure the area between the Cooper and the Edisto Rivers, effectively limiting the reach of the British forces to Charleston neck and the nearby islands.[7]

While in his camp at the Round O, General Greene was informed that large reinforcements from Ireland and from New York were expected by the army in Charleston. This intelligence excited the more alarm, because the term of service for which the levies from Virginia were engaged was about expiring, and no adequate measures had been taken for supplying their places. It proved untrue; but such was its impression, that the general addressed a letter to the governors of South Carolina, in which, after taking a serious view of the state of his army, he recommended that it should be recruited from the slaves. The governor thought the proposition of sufficient importance to be laid before the legislature, which was soon afterwards convened; but the measure was not adopted.

While camped at the Round O, General Greene learned that large reinforcements from Ireland and New York were expected by the army in Charleston. This news caused a lot of concern, especially since the term of service for the Virginia troops was ending soon, and there weren't enough plans in place to replace them. It turned out to be false, but it made such a strong impression that the general wrote a letter to the governors of South Carolina. In it, he seriously assessed the situation of his army and suggested that it be reinforced by enlisting slaves. The governor deemed the suggestion important enough to present to the legislature, which was convened shortly after; however, the proposal was not accepted.

On the fourth of January, General St. Clair, who conducted the reinforcement from the north, arrived in camp, and, five days afterward, General Wayne,[8] with his brigade, and the remnant of the third regiment of dragoons, commanded by Colonel White, was detached over the Savannah for the recovery of Georgia.

On January 4th, General St. Clair, who led the reinforcements from the north, arrived at camp. Five days later, General Wayne,[8] along with his brigade and the remaining third regiment of dragoons, commanded by Colonel White, was sent across the Savannah to reclaim Georgia.

General Greene crossed the Edisto and took post six miles in advance of Jacksonborough, on the road leading to Charleston, for the purpose of covering the state legislature, which assembled at that place on the eighteenth. Thus was civil government re-established in South Carolina, and that state restored to the union.

General Greene crossed the Edisto River and positioned himself six miles ahead of Jacksonborough, along the road to Charleston, to protect the state legislature that met there on the eighteenth. This marked the reestablishment of civil government in South Carolina and the state’s return to the union.

It is impossible to review this active and interesting campaign without feeling that much is due to General Greene; and that he amply justified the favourable opinion of the Commander-in-chief. He found the country completely conquered, and defended by a regular army estimated at four thousand men. The inhabitants were so divided, as to leave it doubtful to which side the majority was attached. At no time did the effective continental force which he could bring into the field, amount to two thousand men; and of these a considerable part were raw troops. Yet he could keep the field without being forced into action; and by a course of judicious movement, and of hardy enterprise, in which invincible constancy was displayed, and in which courage was happily tempered with prudence, he recovered the southern states. It is a singular fact, well worthy of notice, which marks impressively the soundness of his judgment, that although he never gained a decisive victory, he obtained, to a considerable extent, even when defeated, the object for which he fought.

It’s impossible to look back at this active and engaging campaign without recognizing that much credit goes to General Greene; he truly validated the Commander-in-chief’s positive view of him. He encountered a country that was completely conquered, defended by a regular army estimated to be around four thousand men. The locals were so divided that it was unclear which side most of them were on. At no point did the effective Continental force he could muster exceed two thousand men, and a significant portion of these were inexperienced troops. Still, he managed to remain in the field without being pushed into action. Through wise movements and bold actions, showcasing unwavering determination while balancing bravery with caution, he successfully regained control of the southern states. It's noteworthy that even though he never secured a decisive victory, he often achieved his goals to a great extent, even in defeat, which highlights the strength of his judgment.

A just portion of the praise deserved by these achievements, is unquestionably due to the troops he commanded. These real patriots bore every hardship and privation[9] with a degree of patience and constancy which can not be sufficiently admired. And never was a general better supported by his inferior officers. Not shackled by men who, without merit, held stations of high rank obtained by political influence, he commanded young men of equal spirit and intelligence, formed under the eye of Washington, and trained in the school furnished in the severe service of the north, to all the hardships and dangers of war.

A fair amount of the praise these achievements deserve is definitely attributed to the troops he led. These true patriots endured every hardship and deprivation with a level of patience and steadfastness that is truly commendable. Never has a general been better supported by his subordinate officers. Free from being hindered by unqualified individuals in high positions due to political connections, he commanded young men of equal spirit and intelligence, shaped under Washington's guidance, and trained in the tough conditions of the north, preparing them for all the challenges and dangers of war.

A peculiar importance was given to these successes in the south by the opinion that a pacific temper was finding its way into the cabinets of the belligerent powers of Europe. The communications from the court of Versailles rendered it probable that negotiations for peace would take place in the course of the ensuing winter; and dark hints had been given on the part of Great Britain to the minister of his most Christian Majesty, that all the American states could not reasonably expect to become independent, as several of them were subdued. Referring to the precedent of the low countries, it was observed that of the seventeen provinces originally united against the Spanish crown, only seven obtained their independence.

A strange significance was attached to these successes in the south due to the belief that a peaceful attitude was emerging in the cabinets of the warring powers of Europe. Reports from the court of Versailles made it likely that peace negotiations would happen during the upcoming winter; and there were vague suggestions from Great Britain to the minister of his most Christian Majesty that not all the American states could realistically expect to gain independence, as several of them had been defeated. Citing the example of the Low Countries, it was noted that of the seventeen provinces initially united against the Spanish crown, only seven achieved their independence.

Additional motives for exertion were furnished by other communications from the French monarch. These were that, after the present campaign, no farther pecuniary or military aids were to be expected from France. The situation of affairs in Europe would, it was said, demand all the exertions which that nation was capable of making; and the forces of his most Christian Majesty might render as much real service to the common cause elsewhere as in America.[10]

Additional reasons to work hard came from other messages from the French king. He stated that after the current campaign, there would be no more financial or military support from France. The situation in Europe, it was claimed, would require all the efforts that the country could muster; and the troops of his most Christian Majesty could provide just as much real assistance to the common cause elsewhere as they could in America.[10]


CHAPTER II.

Preparations for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain.... Conciliatory conduct of General Carleton.... Transactions in the south.... Negotiations for peace.... Preliminary and eventual articles agreed upon between the United States and Great Britain.... Discontents of the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny of a part of the Pennsylvania line.... Evacuation of New York.... General Washington resigns his commission and retires to Mount Vernon.

Getting ready for another campaign.... Proceedings in the Parliament of Great Britain.... Diplomatic efforts by General Carleton.... Events in the south.... Peace talks.... Initial and final agreements made between the United States and Great Britain.... Dissatisfaction within the American army.... Peace.... Mutiny among some of the Pennsylvania line.... Withdrawal from New York.... General Washington steps down from his position and goes back to Mount Vernon.

 

1782
Preparations for another campaign.

The splendid success of the allied arms in Virginia, and the great advantages obtained still farther south, produced no disposition in General Washington to relax those exertions which might be necessary to secure the great object of the contest. "I shall attempt to stimulate congress," said he, in a letter to General Greene written at Mount Vernon, "to the best improvement of our late success, by taking the most vigorous and effectual measures to be ready for an early and decisive campaign the next year. My greatest fear is, that viewing this stroke in a point of light which may too much magnify its importance, they may think our work too nearly closed, and fall into a state of languor and relaxation. To prevent this error, I shall employ every means in my power, and, if unhappily we sink into this fatal mistake, no part of the blame shall be mine."

The impressive success of the allied forces in Virginia, along with the significant advantages gained further south, didn't lead General Washington to ease up on the efforts that might be needed to secure the main goal of the conflict. "I’ll try to encourage Congress," he wrote in a letter to General Greene from Mount Vernon, "to make the most of our recent success by taking the strongest and most effective steps to be ready for an early and decisive campaign next year. My biggest concern is that, viewing this victory in a way that overstates its significance, they might think our work is almost done and slip into a state of laziness and complacency. To avoid this mistake, I will use every resource at my disposal, and if, unfortunately, we fall into this dangerous error, I won’t take any of the blame."

On the 27th of November he reached Philadelphia, and congress passed a resolution granting him an audience on the succeeding day. On his appearance the President addressed him in a short speech, informing him that a committee was appointed to state the requisitions to be made for the proper establishment of the army, and expressing the expectation that he would remain in Philadelphia, in order to aid the consultations on that important subject.

On November 27th, he arrived in Philadelphia, and Congress passed a resolution allowing him to meet the next day. When he showed up, the President gave him a brief speech, letting him know that a committee was set up to outline the needs for properly establishing the army, and expressing hope that he would stay in Philadelphia to help with discussions on this important issue.

The secretary of war, the financier, and the secretary of foreign affairs, assisted at these deliberations; and the business was concluded with unusual celerity.

The secretary of war, the financier, and the secretary of foreign affairs were present for these discussions, and the work was completed unusually quickly.

A revenue was scarcely less necessary than an army; and it was obvious that the means for carrying on the war must be obtained, either by impressment, or by a vigorous course of taxation. But both these alternatives depended on the states; and the government of the union resorted to the influence of the Commander-in-chief in aid of its requisitions.

A revenue was barely less essential than an army; and it was clear that the funds needed to continue the war had to come from either impressment or a strong approach to taxation. But both of these options relied on the states; and the federal government turned to the Commander-in-chief's influence to support its demands.

But no exertions on the part of America alone could expel the invading army. A superiority at sea was indispensable to the success of offensive operations against the posts which the British still held within the United States. To obtain this superiority, General Washington pressed its importance on the minister of France and commanding officers of the French troops, as well as on the Marquis de Lafayette, who was about to return to his native country.

But America couldn’t drive out the invading army on its own. Being dominant at sea was crucial for successfully attacking the British posts still located within the United States. To achieve this dominance, General Washington emphasized its importance to the French minister, the commanding officers of the French troops, and the Marquis de Lafayette, who was about to return to France.

Proceedings in the British parliament.

The first intelligence from Europe was far from being calculated to diminish the anxieties still felt in America by the enlightened friends of the revolution. The parliament of Great Britain reassembled in November. The speech from the throne breathed a settled purpose to continue the war; and the addresses from both houses, which were carried by large majorities, echoed the sentiment.

The initial news from Europe did little to ease the worries still present in America among the informed supporters of the revolution. The British Parliament reconvened in November. The speech from the throne expressed a firm intention to persist with the war, and the addresses from both houses, which passed with overwhelming majorities, reflected that same sentiment.

In the course of the animated debates which these addresses occasioned, an intention was indeed avowed by some members of the administration to change their system. The plan indicated for the future was to direct the whole force of the nation against France and Spain; and to suspend offensive operations in the interior of the United States, until the strength of those powers should be broken. In the mean time, the posts then occupied by their troops were to be maintained.

In the lively discussions that these speeches sparked, some members of the administration openly stated their intention to alter their approach. The proposed plan for the future was to focus the nation’s full strength against France and Spain, while putting a hold on offensive actions within the United States until those powers were weakened. Meanwhile, the areas currently held by their troops were to be secured.

This development of the views of administration furnished additional motives to the American government for exerting all the faculties of the nation, to expel the British garrisons from New York and Charleston. The efforts of the Commander-in-chief to produce these exertions were earnest and unremitting, but not successful. The state legislatures declared the inability of their constituents to pay taxes. Instead of filling the continental treasury, some were devising means to draw money from it; and some of those who passed bills imposing heavy taxes, directed that the demands of the state should be first satisfied, and that the residue only should be paid to the continental receiver. By the unwearied attention and judicious arrangements of the minister of finance, the expenses of the nation had been greatly reduced. The bank established in Philadelphia, and his own high character, had enabled him to support in some degree a system of credit, the advantages of which were incalculably great.

This shift in administrative views gave the American government more reasons to mobilize the entire nation to drive the British troops out of New York and Charleston. The efforts of the Commander-in-chief to encourage these actions were intense and continuous, but ultimately unsuccessful. The state legislatures announced that their constituents could not afford to pay taxes. Instead of contributing to the continental treasury, some were finding ways to withdraw money from it; and some of those who passed laws imposing heavy taxes specified that state demands should be prioritized, with only the remaining funds going to the continental receiver. Thanks to the tireless efforts and smart planning of the finance minister, the nation’s expenses had been significantly lowered. The bank set up in Philadelphia, along with his strong reputation, allowed him to maintain a credit system that offered immense benefits.

He had through the Chevalier de la Luzerne obtained permission from his most Christian Majesty to draw for half a million of livres monthly, until six millions should be received. To prevent the diversion of any part of this sum from the most essential objects, he had concealed the negotiation even from congress, and had communicated it only to the Commander-in-chief; yet, after receiving the first instalment, it was discovered that Doctor Franklin had anticipated the residue of the loan, and had appropriated it to the purposes of the United States. At the commencement of the year 1782, not a dollar remained in the treasury; and, although congress had required the payment of two millions on the 1st of April, not a cent had been received on the twenty-third of that month; and, so late as the 1st of June, not more than twenty thousand dollars had reached the treasury. Yet to the financier every eye was turned; to him the empty hand of every public creditor was stretched forth; and against him, instead of the state governments, the complaints and imprecations of every unsatisfied claimant were directed. In July, when the second quarter annual payment of taxes ought to have been received, the minister of finance was informed by some of his agents, that the collection of the revenue had been postponed in some of the states, in consequence of which the month of December would arrive before any money could come into the hands of the continental receivers. In a letter communicating this unpleasant intelligence to the Commander-in-chief, he added, "with such gloomy prospects as this letter affords, I am tied here to be baited by continual clamorous demands; and for the forfeiture of all that is valuable in life, and which I hoped at this moment to enjoy, I am to be paid by invective. Scarce a day passes in which I am not tempted to give back into the hands of congress the power they have delegated, and to lay down a burden which presses me to the earth. Nothing prevents me but a knowledge of the difficulties I am obliged to struggle under. What may be the success of my efforts God only knows; but to leave my post at present, would, I know, be ruinous. This candid state of my situation and feelings I give to your bosom, because you who have already felt and suffered so much, will be able to sympathize with me."

He had gotten permission from the Chevalier de la Luzerne to withdraw half a million livres each month, until he had received six million. To make sure none of this money was diverted from crucial needs, he had kept the negotiation secret even from Congress, only sharing it with the Commander-in-chief. However, after getting the first payment, it was found out that Doctor Franklin had already taken the remaining loan and assigned it to the needs of the United States. By the beginning of 1782, there was no money left in the treasury; although Congress had requested two million by April 1st, not a single cent had been received by the twenty-third of that month, and by June 1st, only about twenty thousand dollars had made it to the treasury. Yet everyone looked to the financier; every public creditor extended their empty hands toward him, and instead of the state governments, all complaints and curses from every unsatisfied claimant were directed at him. In July, when the second quarterly tax payment was due, the finance minister was informed by some agents that revenue collection had been delayed in some states, meaning that it wouldn’t be until December before any money would reach the Continental receivers. In a letter to the Commander-in-chief sharing this bad news, he added, “With such bleak prospects that this letter presents, I'm stuck here facing constant, loud demands; and for the loss of everything valuable in life, which I hoped to enjoy at this moment, I’m being compensated with insults. Hardly a day goes by without me being tempted to return the power Congress gave me and to drop a burden that's crushing me. The only thing stopping me is an awareness of the struggles I have to endure. Only God knows what the outcome of my efforts will be, but I know that leaving my position now would be disastrous. I'm sharing this honest account of my situation and feelings with you because you, who have already experienced and endured so much, will be able to understand my plight.”

 

Livingston Manor, Dobbs Ferry, New York

Livingston Manor, Dobbs Ferry, New York

A monument erected by the Sons of the Revolution on the lawn of this historic mansion, overlooking the Hudson River, states that here, on July 6, 1781, the French allies under Rochambeau joined the American Army. Here also, on August 14, 1781, Washington planned the Yorktown campaign which brought to a triumphant end the War for American Independence; and here, on May 6, 1783, Washington and Sir Guy Carleton arranged for the evacuation of American soil by the British. A concluding paragraph reads: "And opposite this point, May 8, 1783, a British sloop of war fired 17 guns in honor of the American Commander-in-Chief, the first salute by Great Britain to the United States of America."

A monument put up by the Sons of the Revolution on the lawn of this historic mansion, overlooking the Hudson River, says that here, on July 6, 1781, the French allies led by Rochambeau joined the American Army. Also here, on August 14, 1781, Washington planned the Yorktown campaign that successfully ended the War for American Independence; and here, on May 6, 1783, Washington and Sir Guy Carleton arranged for the British to evacuate American soil. The concluding paragraph states: "And across from this point, on May 8, 1783, a British sloop of war fired 17 guns in honor of the American Commander-in-Chief, the first salute by Great Britain to the United States of America."

 

Fortunately for the United States, the temper of the British nation on the subject of continuing the war did not accord with that of its sovereign. That war, into which the people had entered with at least as much eagerness as the minister, had become almost universally unpopular.

Fortunately for the United States, the mood of the British public about continuing the war did not match that of their sovereign. That war, which the people had joined with at least as much enthusiasm as the minister, had become nearly universally unpopular.

February 27.

Motions against the measures of administration respecting America were repeated by the opposition; and, on every experiment, the strength of the minority increased. At length, on the 27th of February, General Conway moved in the house of commons, "that it is the opinion of this house that a farther prosecution of offensive war against America would, under present circumstances, be the means of weakening the efforts of this country against her European enemies, and tend to increase the mutual enmity so fatal to the interests both of Great Britain and America." The whole force of administration was exerted to get rid of this resolution, but was exerted in vain; and it was carried. An address to the king, in the words of the resolution, was immediately voted, and was presented by the whole house. March 4.The answer of the crown being deemed inexplicit, it was on the 4th of March resolved, "that the house will consider as enemies to his majesty and the country, all those who should advise, or attempt a farther prosecution of offensive war on the continent of North America."

Motions against the government's actions regarding America were repeatedly made by the opposition, and with each effort, the strength of the minority grew. Finally, on February 27th, General Conway proposed in the House of Commons, "that this house believes continuing offensive war against America would, given the current situation, weaken our efforts against European enemies and increase the hostility harmful to the interests of both Great Britain and America." The full influence of the government was used to dismiss this resolution, but it was ineffective, and the resolution passed. An address to the king, reflecting the resolution, was immediately voted on and presented by the entire house. March 4th. Since the crown's response was seen as unclear, on March 4th it was resolved, "that the house will consider as enemies to his majesty and the country anyone who advises or tries to continue offensive war on the continent of North America."

These votes were soon followed by a change of ministers, and by instructions to the officers commanding the forces in America, which conformed to them.

These votes were quickly followed by a change in ministers and by instructions to the officers in charge of the forces in America, which aligned with them.

While General Washington was employed in addressing circular letters to the state governments, suggesting all those motives which might stimulate them to exertions better proportioned to the exigency, English papers containing the debates in parliament on the various propositions respecting America, reached the United States. Alarmed at the impression these debates might make, he introduced the opinions it was deemed prudent to inculcate respecting them, into the letters he was then about to transmit to the governors of the several states. "I have perused these debates," he said, "with great attention and care, with a view, if possible, to penetrate their real design; and upon the most mature deliberation I can bestow, I am obliged to declare it as my candid opinion, that the measure, in all its views, so far as it respects America, is merely delusory, having no serious intention to admit our independence upon its true principles, but is calculated to produce a change of ministers to quiet the minds of their own people, and reconcile them to a continuance of the war, while it is meant to amuse this country with a false idea of peace, to draw us from our connexion with France, and to lull us into a state of security and inactivity, which taking place, the ministry will be left to prosecute the war in other parts of the world with greater vigour and effect. Your excellency will permit me on this occasion to observe, that, even if the nation and parliament are really in earnest to obtain peace with America, it will undoubtedly be wisdom in us to meet them with great caution and circumspection, and by all means to keep our arms firm in our hands, and instead of relaxing one iota in our exertions, rather to spring forward with redoubled vigour, that we may take the advantage of every favourable opportunity, until our wishes are fully obtained. No nation yet suffered in treaty by preparing (even in the moment of negotiation) most vigorously for the field.

While General Washington was working on circular letters to the state governments, suggesting motivations that might encourage them to take more appropriate actions, English newspapers arrived in the United States containing the parliamentary debates on various proposals regarding America. Concerned about the impact these debates could have, he included the opinions that he thought were wise to communicate about them in the letters he was preparing to send to the governors of the states. "I have read these debates," he said, "with considerable attention and care, trying to understand their true intent; and after giving it serious thought, I must honestly say that the measure, in all its aspects regarding America, is simply misleading. It has no real intention to recognize our independence on legitimate grounds, but instead aims to create a change in leadership to calm their own citizens and make them accept the ongoing war, while simultaneously trying to distract us with a false notion of peace, drawing us away from our connection with France, and putting us in a state of security and inactivity. If that happens, the government will be free to pursue the war elsewhere with greater strength and effectiveness. Your excellency will allow me to note that even if the nation and parliament genuinely wish for peace with America, it would be wise for us to approach them with great caution and awareness, and to maintain a strong grip on our arms. Instead of easing our efforts, we should push forward with even more determination to take advantage of every favorable opportunity until we achieve our goals. No nation has ever been harmed in negotiations by preparing vigorously for battle, even in the midst of talks."

"The industry which the enemy is using to propagate their pacific reports, appears to me a circumstance very suspicious; and the eagerness with which the people, as I am informed, are catching at them, is, in my opinion, equally dangerous."

"The industry that the enemy is using to spread their peaceful reports seems very suspicious to me; and the eagerness with which the public, as I've been told, is grabbing onto them is, in my view, equally dangerous."

May.
Conciliatory conduct of General Carleton.

Early in May, Sir Guy Carleton, who had succeeded Sir Henry Clinton in the command of all the British forces in the United States, arrived at New York. Having been also appointed in conjunction with Admiral Digby, a commissioner to negotiate a peace, he lost no time in conveying to General Washington copies of the votes of the British Parliament, and of a bill which had been introduced on the part of administration, authorizing his Majesty to conclude a peace or truce with those who were still denominated "the revolted colonies of North America." These papers, he said, would manifest the dispositions prevailing with the government and people of England towards those of America; and, if the like pacific temper should prevail in this country, both inclination and duty would lead him to meet it with the most zealous concurrence. He had addressed to congress, he said, a letter containing the same communications, and he solicited a passport for the person who should convey it.

Early in May, Sir Guy Carleton, who had taken over from Sir Henry Clinton as the leader of all British forces in the United States, arrived in New York. He was also appointed, along with Admiral Digby, as a commissioner to negotiate a peace. He quickly got in touch with General Washington, sharing copies of the British Parliament's votes and a bill introduced by the administration that allowed the King to negotiate a peace or truce with those still called "the revolted colonies of North America." He mentioned that these documents would show the attitudes of the British government and people toward America. If a similar desire for peace existed in this country, he would be more than willing to support it wholeheartedly. He also stated that he had sent a letter to Congress with the same information, asking for a passport for the person who would deliver it.

At this time, the bill enabling the British monarch to conclude a peace or truce with America had not become a law; nor was any assurance given that the present commissioners were empowered to offer other terms than those which had been formerly rejected. General Carleton therefore could not hope that negotiations would commence on such a basis; nor be disappointed at the refusal of the passports he requested by congress, to whom the application was, of course, referred. The letter may have been written for the general purpose of conciliation, and of producing a disposition in the United States on the subject of hostilities, corresponding with that which had been expressed in the House of Commons. But the situation of the United States justified a suspicion of different motives; and prudence required that their conduct should be influenced by that suspicion. The repugnance of the king to a dismemberment of the empire was understood; and it was thought probable that the sentiments expressed in the House of Commons might be attributable rather to a desire of changing ministers, than to any fixed determination to relinquish the design of reannexing America to the crown.

At this time, the bill that would allow the British monarch to make peace or a truce with America had not yet become law; nor was there any guarantee that the current commissioners had the authority to offer terms different from those that had previously been rejected. General Carleton, therefore, could not expect negotiations to begin on such grounds, nor could he be disappointed by Congress's refusal of the passports he requested, since the application was, of course, sent to them. The letter may have been written primarily to promote reconciliation and to create a favorable attitude in the United States regarding hostilities, similar to what had been expressed in the House of Commons. However, the circumstances in the United States justified a suspicion of underlying motives; and it was wise to let that suspicion guide their actions. The king's reluctance to let go of the empire's territory was understood, and it was believed that the sentiments voiced in the House of Commons were likely more about wanting to change ministers than any real intention to give up the goal of reattaching America to the crown.

Under these impressions, the overtures now made were considered as opiates, administered to lull the spirit of vigilance which the guardians of the public safety laboured to keep up, into a state of fatal repose; and to prevent those measures of security which it might yet be necessary to adopt.

Under these impressions, the proposals being made were seen as soothing distractions, intended to lull the watchfulness that those responsible for public safety worked hard to maintain into a dangerous complacency; and to block any security measures that might still be necessary to implement.

This jealousy was nourished by all the intelligence received from Europe. The utmost address of the British cabinet had been employed to detach the belligerents from each other. The mediation of Russia had been accepted to procure a separate peace with Holland; propositions had been submitted both to France and Spain, tending to an accommodation of differences with each of those powers singly; and inquiries had been made of Mr. Adams, the American minister at the Hague, which seemed to contemplate the same object with regard to the United States. These political manoeuvres furnished additional motives for doubting the sincerity of the English cabinet. Whatever views might actuate the court of St. James on this subject, the resolution of the American government to make no separate treaty was unalterable.[11]

This jealousy was fueled by all the information coming in from Europe. The British government used every possible strategy to drive a wedge between the warring parties. They accepted Russia's help to secure a separate peace with Holland; proposals were made to both France and Spain aimed at resolving issues with each country individually; and questions were posed to Mr. Adams, the American minister at the Hague, that seemed to have the same goal regarding the United States. These political moves provided further reasons to doubt the honesty of the British government. Regardless of what motives the court of St. James might have regarding this issue, the American government's decision to avoid a separate treaty was firm.[11]

But the public votes which have been stated, and probably his private instructions, restrained Sir Guy Carleton from offensive war; and the state of the American army disabled General Washington from making any attempt on the posts in possession of the British. The campaign of 1782 consequently passed away without furnishing any military operations of moment between the armies under the immediate direction of the respective commanders-in-chief.

But the public votes that have been mentioned, and likely his private instructions, kept Sir Guy Carleton from waging offensive war; and the condition of the American army prevented General Washington from attempting to take the posts held by the British. As a result, the campaign of 1782 went by without any significant military actions between the armies led by the respective commanders-in-chief.

August.
Negotiations for peace.

Early in August a letter was received by General Washington from Sir Guy Carleton and Admiral Digby, which, among other communications manifesting a pacific disposition on the part of England, contained the information that Mr. Grenville was at Paris, invested with full powers to treat with all the parties at war, that negotiations for a general peace were already commenced, and that his Majesty had commanded his minister to direct Mr. Grenville, that the independence of the thirteen provinces should be proposed by him in the first instance, instead of being made a condition of a general treaty. But that this proposition would be made in the confidence that the loyalists would be restored to their possessions, or a full compensation made them for whatever confiscations might have taken place.

Early in August, General Washington received a letter from Sir Guy Carleton and Admiral Digby. This letter, among other messages expressing a peaceful attitude from England, included the news that Mr. Grenville was in Paris with full authority to negotiate with all the warring parties. Negotiations for a general peace had already started, and the King had instructed his minister to tell Mr. Grenville to propose the independence of the thirteen provinces right away, rather than making it a condition of a general treaty. However, this proposal would be made with the expectation that loyalists would be restored to their properties or compensated fully for any confiscations that had occurred.

This letter was, not long afterwards, followed by one from Sir Guy Carleton, declaring that he could discern no further object of contest, and that he disapproved of all farther hostilities by sea or land, which could only multiply the miseries of individuals, without a possible advantage to either nation. In pursuance of this opinion, he had, soon after his arrival in New York, restrained the practice of detaching parties of Indians against the frontiers of the United States, and had recalled those which were previously engaged in those bloody incursions.

This letter was soon followed by one from Sir Guy Carleton, stating that he saw no further reason for conflict and that he opposed any more fighting, whether at sea or on land, as it would only increase the suffering of individuals without benefiting either nation. Following this view, he had, shortly after arriving in New York, stopped the practice of sending groups of Native Americans against the borders of the United States and had brought back those who were already involved in those violent attacks.

These communications appear to have alarmed the jealousy of the minister of France. To quiet his fears, congress renewed the resolution "to enter into no discussion of any overtures for pacification, but in confidence and in concert with his most Christian Majesty;"[12] and again recommend to the several states to adopt such measures as would most effectually guard against all intercourse with any subjects of the British crown during the war.

These communications seem to have stirred the jealousy of the French minister. To ease his concerns, Congress reaffirmed the resolution "to hold no discussions about any peace proposals, except in confidence and together with his most Christian Majesty;"[12] and once again urged the individual states to take measures that would best protect against any contact with subjects of the British crown during the war.

The same causes which produced this inactivity in the north, operated to a considerable extent with the armies of the south.

The same reasons that led to this inactivity in the north also had a significant impact on the southern armies.

When General Wayne entered Georgia, the British troops in that state retired to the town of Savannah; and the Americans advanced to Ebenezer. Though inferior to their enemy in numbers, they interrupted his communications with the country, and even burned some magazines which had been collected and deposited under the protection of his guns.

When General Wayne entered Georgia, the British troops in that state pulled back to the town of Savannah, and the Americans moved forward to Ebenezer. Although they were outnumbered, they disrupted his supply lines with the surrounding area and even burned some stored supplies that were protected by his artillery.

Not receiving the aids from the militia which he had expected, Wayne pressed Greene for reinforcements, which that officer was unable to furnish, until Lieutenant Colonel Posey arrived from Virginia with about two hundred men. He proceeded immediately to Georgia, and reached the camp at Ebenezer on the 1st of April.

Not getting the support from the militia that he had anticipated, Wayne urged Greene for reinforcements, which that officer couldn’t provide, until Lieutenant Colonel Posey showed up from Virginia with about two hundred men. He went straight to Georgia and arrived at the camp in Ebenezer on April 1st.

These troops, though new levies, were veteran soldiers, who, having served the times for which they enlisted, had become the substitutes of men who were designated, by lot, for tours of duty they were unwilling to perform. Being commanded by old officers of approved courage and experience, the utmost confidence was to be placed in them; and Wayne, though still inferior to his enemy in numbers, sought for opportunities to employ them.

These troops, while new recruits, were seasoned soldiers who, after serving their enlistment period, had stepped in for men who had been randomly chosen for duties they didn’t want to do. With experienced officers leading them, who were known for their bravery and skill, they inspired great confidence. Wayne, despite being outnumbered by his enemy, looked for chances to make use of them.

The Indians, who occupied the southern and western parts of Georgia, were in the habit of assembling annually at Augusta, for the purpose of receiving those presents which were indispensable to the preservation of British influence over them. The usual time for holding these meetings was arrived; but the Americans being in possession of Augusta, it was necessary to transfer them to a British post, and the Indians were invited to keep down the south side of the Altamaha to its mouth, whence they were to be conveyed through the inland passage to Savannah. Arrangements had been made for bringing a strong party of Creeks and Choctaws, assembled on the south side of Altamaha, to Harris's bridge, on the Ogechee, about seven miles from that town, and Colonel Brown marched at the head of a strong detachment to convoy them into it. The Indians having quarrelled, instead of proceeding to Ogechee, returned home, and Brown marched back his detachment.

The Native Americans, who lived in the southern and western parts of Georgia, would gather each year in Augusta to receive gifts that were essential for maintaining British influence over them. The usual time for these meetings arrived, but since the Americans were in control of Augusta, the meetings needed to be moved to a British outpost. The Indians were invited to head down the south side of the Altamaha River to its mouth, where they would be transported through the inland passage to Savannah. Plans were made to bring a large group of Creeks and Choctaws together on the south side of the Altamaha, to Harris's bridge on the Ogechee, about seven miles from the town. Colonel Brown led a strong detachment to escort them there. However, after the Indians got into a dispute, they decided to go home instead of continuing to Ogechee, and Brown marched his detachment back.

Wayne received intelligence of this movement; and, determining to avail himself of the opportunity given by this division of his enemy to fight him in detail, immediately put his army in motion. He was soon informed that Brown was on his return, and would reach Savannah that night. Disregarding the danger of throwing himself with inferior numbers between the two divisions of the British army, he determined on hazarding an action, and his advance, consisting of a troop of Virginia cavalry, commanded by Captain Hughes and Lieutenant Boyer, and a light company of Virginia infantry, commanded by Captain Parker, entered the road along which Brown was marching about twelve at night, just as his front appeared in view. A vigorous charge was instantly made, which, being entirely unexpected, was completely successful. The British, struck with a panic, dispersed among the thickets and fled in all directions. Colonel Douglass and about forty men were killed, wounded, or taken. The American loss was five men killed and two wounded. The next day, after parading in view of Savannah, Wayne resumed his position at Ebenezer.

Wayne received word about this movement and decided to take advantage of the opportunity created by the division of his enemy to fight them separately. He quickly mobilized his army. He soon learned that Brown was on his way back and would reach Savannah that night. Ignoring the risk of positioning himself with fewer troops between the two divisions of the British army, he decided to take a chance on engaging in battle. His advance force, made up of a troop of Virginia cavalry led by Captain Hughes and Lieutenant Boyer, along with a light company of Virginia infantry commanded by Captain Parker, entered the road where Brown was marching around midnight, just as the front came into sight. They launched a strong charge, which was completely unexpected and turned out to be very effective. The British were caught off guard and scattered into the thickets, fleeing in all directions. Colonel Douglass and about forty men were killed, wounded, or captured. The American losses were five men killed and two wounded. The next day, after gathering in view of Savannah, Wayne went back to his position at Ebenezer.

The resolution of Parliament against the farther prosecution of active war in America was followed by instructions to the officers commanding the armies of Britain, in consequence of which propositions for the suspension of hostilities were made in the southern department, about the time that they were rejected in the north. The same motives continuing to influence congress, they were rejected in the south also, and the armies still continued to watch each other with vigilance. To avoid surprise, Wayne frequently changed his ground, and was continually on the alert. While his whole attention was directed towards Savannah, an enemy entirely unlooked for came upon his rear, entered his camp in the night, and, had not his army been composed of the best materials, must have dispersed it.

The Parliament's decision to stop pursuing active war in America led to orders for the British army leaders, which resulted in proposals to pause hostilities in the southern region, around the same time they were turned down in the north. With the same reasons influencing Congress, those proposals were also rejected in the south, and the armies continued to closely monitor each other. To prevent being caught off guard, Wayne frequently changed his position and stayed alert. While he focused all his attention on Savannah, an unexpected enemy attacked from behind, entered his camp during the night, and if his army hadn't been made up of the best troops, it would have been scattered.

A strong party of Creeks, led by a gallant warrior, Emistasigo, or Guristersego, instead of moving down on the south side of the Altamaha, passed through the centre of Georgia with the determination of engaging the American posts. Marching entirely in the night, through unfrequented ways, subsisting on meal made of parched corn, and guided by white men, they reached the neighbourhood of the American army then encamped at Gibbon's plantation, near Savannah, without being perceived, and made arrangements to attack it. In the night they emerged from the deep swamp in which they had been concealed, and, approaching the rear of the American camp with the utmost secrecy, reached it about three in the morning. The sentinel was killed before he could sound the alarm, and the first notice was given by the fire and the yell of the enemy. The Indians rushed into the camp, and, killing the few men they fell in with, seized the artillery. Fortunately some time was wasted in the attempt to turn the pieces on the Americans. Captain Parker, who commanded the light company, had been employed on a very fatiguing tour of duty near Savannah, and had returned that evening to camp. To allow his harassed soldiers some repose, he was placed in the rear near the artillery, and was asleep when the Indians entered the camp. Roused by the fire, and perceiving that the enemy was amidst them, he judiciously drew off his men in silence, and formed them with the quarter guard behind the house in which the general was quartered. Wayne was instantly on horseback, and, believing the whole garrison from Savannah to be upon him, determined to repulse the enemy or die in the attempt. Parker was directed to charge immediately with the bayonet, and orders were despatched to Posey, the commanding officer in camp, to bring up the troops without delay. The orders to Parker were so promptly executed, that Posey, although he moved with the utmost celerity, could not reach the scene of action in time to join in it. The light troops and quarter guard under Parker drove every thing before them at the point of the bayonet. The Indians, unable to resist the bayonet, soon fled, leaving their chief, his white guides, and seventeen of his warriors dead upon the spot. Wayne, who accompanied his light troops, now first discovered the character of his enemy, and adapted his pursuit to it. Yet only twelve prisoners were made. The general's horse was shot under him, and twelve privates were killed and wounded.[13]

A strong group of Creeks, led by a brave warrior, Emistasigo, or Guristersego, instead of heading down the south side of the Altamaha, traveled through the heart of Georgia with the intent to engage the American posts. Marching entirely at night, through seldom-used paths, living on cornmeal made from parched corn, and guided by white men, they arrived near the American army camped at Gibbon's plantation, close to Savannah, without being detected, and made plans to attack. They emerged from the dense swamp where they had hidden in the early hours of the morning, quietly approaching the back of the American camp. The sentinel was killed before he could raise the alarm, and the first warning came from the sound of fire and enemy shouts. The Indians rushed into the camp, killing the few soldiers they encountered and seizing the artillery. Thankfully, some time was lost trying to turn the cannons against the Americans. Captain Parker, who commanded the light company, had just returned from a tiring duty near Savannah that evening. To give his exhausted soldiers some rest, he was stationed at the rear near the artillery and was asleep when the Indians attacked. Awoken by the sounds of gunfire and realizing the enemy was inside the camp, he wisely withdrew his men quietly and formed them with the quarter guard behind the house where the general was stationed. Wayne quickly mounted his horse, believing the entire garrison from Savannah was under attack, and resolved to push back the enemy or die trying. Parker was ordered to charge immediately with bayonets, and instructions were sent to Posey, the officer in charge of the camp, to bring up the troops without delay. Parker's orders were executed so quickly that Posey, despite moving as fast as possible, couldn’t reach the scene in time to join the fight. The light troops and quarter guard under Parker overwhelmed the enemy with their bayonets. Unable to hold their ground against the bayonets, the Indians quickly fled, leaving their chief, his white guides, and seventeen of his warriors dead at the scene. Wayne, who was with his light troops, then realized the nature of his enemy and adjusted his pursuit accordingly. However, only twelve prisoners were taken. The general's horse was shot from under him, and twelve soldiers were killed and wounded.[13]

This sharp conflict terminated the war in Georgia. Information was soon given of the determination to withdraw the British troops from Savannah; and arrangements being made, with the sanction of the civil government, for the security of such individuals as might remain in town, the place was evacuated. The regular troops retired to Charleston, and Colonel Brown conducted his loyalists through the islands into Florida. Wayne was directed to rejoin General Greene.

This intense conflict ended the war in Georgia. News soon came about the decision to pull the British troops out of Savannah, and plans were put into place, with the approval of the local government, to ensure the safety of those who might stay in town. The area was evacuated. The regular troops withdrew to Charleston, and Colonel Brown led his loyalists through the islands into Florida. Wayne was instructed to reunite with General Greene.

In South Carolina the American army maintained its position in front of Jacksonborough, and that of the British was confined to Charleston and its immediate vicinity. The situation of the ground as well as the condition of his army, was unfavourable to offensive operations on the part of General Greene; and General Leslie, who commanded in Charleston, was not strong enough to attempt the recovery of the lower country. While the two armies continued to watch each other, occasional enterprises were undertaken by detachments, in some of which a considerable degree of merit was displayed. In one of them, the corps of Marion, its general being attending in the legislature, was surprised and dispersed by the British Colonel Thompson; and in another, an English guard galley, mounting twelve guns, and manned with forty-three seamen, was captured by Captain Rudolph, of the legion.

In South Carolina, the American army held its position in front of Jacksonborough, while the British forces were limited to Charleston and the surrounding area. The layout of the land and the state of General Greene's army made it difficult for him to launch any offensive operations. Meanwhile, General Leslie, who was in charge in Charleston, didn’t have enough strength to try to take back the lower country. As both armies kept an eye on each other, there were occasional missions carried out by smaller groups, some of which showed significant skill. In one of these missions, Marion's troops, whose general was attending a legislative session, were surprised and scattered by British Colonel Thompson. In another instance, an English guard galley with twelve guns and crewed by forty-three sailors was captured by Captain Rudolph from the legion.

From the possession of the lower country of South Carolina, which was known to contain considerable quantities of rice and beef cattle, the army had anticipated more regular and more abundant supplies of food than it had been accustomed to receive. This hope was disappointed by the measures of the government.

From the control of the lowlands of South Carolina, which was known to have significant amounts of rice and beef cattle, the army expected more consistent and plentiful food supplies than it was used to. This expectation was let down by the government's actions.

The generals, and other agents acting under the authority of congress, had been accustomed in extreme cases, which too frequently occurred, to seize provisions for the use of the armies. This questionable power had been exercised with forbearance, most commonly in concert with the government of the state, and under the pressure of such obvious necessity as carried its justification with it.

The generals and other agents acting on behalf of Congress had become used to seizing supplies for the armies in extreme cases, which happened all too often. This questionable power had been used with restraint, usually in collaboration with the state government, and under clear necessity that justified the action.

The war being transferred to the south at a time when the depreciation of paper money had deprived congress of its only fund, it became indispensably necessary to resort more generally to coercive means in order to procure subsistence for the troops. Popular discontent was the natural consequence of this odious measure, and the feelings of the people were communicated to their representatives. After the termination of the very active campaign of 1781 in Virginia, the legislature of that state passed a law prohibiting all impressment, "unless it be by warrant from the executive in time of actual invasion;" and the assembly of South Carolina, during the session at Jacksonborough, also passed a law forbidding impressment, and enacting, "that no other persons than those who shall be appointed by the governor for that purpose, shall be allowed or permitted to procure supplies for the army."

The war was shifting to the south at a time when the drop in paper money value had left Congress without its main source of funding. It became absolutely necessary to use more forceful measures to secure supplies for the troops. This unpopular action naturally led to public discontent, and the people's feelings were passed on to their representatives. After the very active campaign of 1781 in Virginia ended, the state legislature passed a law banning all impressment, "unless it be by warrant from the executive in time of actual invasion;" and the assembly in South Carolina, during the session at Jacksonborough, also enacted a law prohibiting impressment, declaring, "that no one other than those appointed by the governor for that purpose shall be allowed to procure supplies for the army."

The effect of this measure was soon felt. The exertions of the agent appointed by the governor failed to procure subsistence for the troops, and General Greene, after a long course of suffering, was compelled to relieve his urgent wants by an occasional recurrence to means forbidden by the law.

The impact of this measure was quickly noticed. The efforts of the agent appointed by the governor didn’t manage to provide supplies for the troops, and General Greene, after enduring a long struggle, was forced to address his urgent needs by occasionally resorting to methods prohibited by the law.

Privations, which had been borne without a murmur under the excitement of active military operations, produced great irritation during the leisure which prevailed after the enemy had abandoned the open field; and, in the Pennsylvania line, which was composed chiefly of foreigners, the discontent was aggravated to such a point as to produce a treasonable intercourse with the enemy, in which a plot is understood to have been laid for seizing General Greene and delivering him to a detachment of British troops, which would move out of Charleston for the purpose of favouring the execution of the design. It was discovered when it is supposed to have been on the point of execution; and a sergeant Gornell, believed to be the chief of the conspiracy, was condemned to death by a court martial, and executed on the 22nd of April. Some others, among whom were two domestics in the general's family, were brought before the court on suspicion of being concerned in the plot, but the testimony was not sufficient to convict them; and twelve deserted the night after it was discovered. There is no reason to believe that the actual guilt of this transaction extended farther.

Privations that had been endured without complaint during the excitement of active military operations caused significant frustration during the downtime that followed the enemy's retreat from the open field. In the Pennsylvania line, mostly made up of foreigners, discontent became so intense that it led to treasonous communication with the enemy. A plot was believed to have been devised to capture General Greene and hand him over to a British troop detachment that would come from Charleston to support the plan. This was discovered just as it was supposed to be carried out, and Sergeant Gornell, thought to be the ringleader of the conspiracy, was sentenced to death by a court martial and executed on April 22. A few others, including two servants from the general's household, were brought before the court on suspicion of involvement in the plot, but there wasn't enough evidence to convict them. Additionally, twelve soldiers deserted the night after the conspiracy was uncovered. There is no reason to believe that the involvement in this incident went any further than that.

July 11.

Charleston was held until the 14th of December. Previous to its evacuation, General Leslie had proposed a cessation of hostilities, and that his troops might be supplied with fresh provisions, in exchange for articles of the last necessity in the American camp. The policy of government being adverse to this proposition, General Greene was under the necessity of refusing his assent to it, and the British general continued to supply his wants by force. This produced several skirmishes with foraging parties, to one of which importance was given by the death of Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, whose loss was universally lamented.

Charleston was held until December 14th. Before it was evacuated, General Leslie suggested a halt to fighting and requested that his troops be supplied with fresh provisions in exchange for essential items from the American camp. Since the government's policy was against this proposal, General Greene had to refuse it, and the British general continued to meet his needs through force. This led to several skirmishes with foraging parties, one of which became significant due to the death of Lieutenant Colonel Laurens, whose loss was deeply mourned.

This gallant and accomplished young gentleman had entered into the family of the Commander-in-chief at an early period of the war, and had always shared a large portion of his esteem. Brave to excess, he sought every occasion to render service to his country, and to acquire that military fame which he pursued with the ardour of a young soldier, whose courage seems to have partaken largely of that romantic spirit which youth and enthusiasm produce in a fearless mind. No small addition to the regrets occasioned by his loss was derived from the reflection that he fell unnecessarily, in an unimportant skirmish, in the last moments of the war, when his rash exposure to the danger which proved fatal to him could no longer be useful to his country.

This brave and skilled young man joined the Commander-in-chief's family early in the war and had always earned a lot of his respect. Extremely courageous, he looked for every opportunity to serve his country and to gain the military fame he chased with the passion of a young soldier, whose bravery was deeply influenced by the romantic spirit that youth and enthusiasm bring to a fearless mind. A big part of the regret felt over his loss came from the thought that he fell unnecessarily in a minor skirmish, in the war's final moments, when his reckless exposure to the danger that ultimately led to his death could no longer benefit his country.

From the arrival of Sir Guy Carleton at New York, the conduct of the British armies on the American continent was regulated by the spirit then recently displayed in the house of commons; and all the sentiments expressed by their general were pacific and conciliatory. But to these nattering appearances it was dangerous to yield implicit confidence. With a change of men, a change of measures might also take place; and, in addition to the ordinary suggestions of prudence, the military events in the West Indies were calculated to keep alive the attention, and to continue the anxieties of the United States.

From the time Sir Guy Carleton arrived in New York, the actions of the British armies on the American continent were shaped by the recent attitudes shown in the House of Commons, and all the statements made by their general were peaceful and supportive. However, it was risky to put complete trust in these pleasing appearances. With a change of personnel, new strategies could emerge as well; and along with the usual precautions, the military developments in the West Indies were meant to keep the United States alert and anxious.

After the surrender of Lord Cornwallis, the arms of France and Spain in the American seas had been attended with such signal success, that the hope of annihilating the power of Great Britain in the West Indies was not too extravagant to be indulged. Immense preparations had been made for the invasion of Jamaica; and, early in April, Admiral Count de Grasse sailed from Martinique with a powerful fleet, having on board the land forces and artillery which were to be employed in the operations against that island. His intention was to form a junction with the Spanish Admiral Don Solano, who lay at Hispaniola; after which the combined fleet, whose superiority promised to render it irresistible, was to proceed on the important enterprise which had been concerted. On his way to Hispaniola, De Grasse was overtaken by Rodney, and brought to an engagement, in which he was totally defeated, and made a prisoner. This decisive victory disconcerted the plans of the combined powers, and gave security to the British islands. In the United States, it was feared that this alteration in the aspect of affairs might influence the councils of the English cabinet on the question of peace; and these apprehensions increased the uneasiness with which all intelligent men contemplated the state of the American finances.

After Lord Cornwallis surrendered, the military efforts of France and Spain in American waters were so successful that the idea of completely defeating Great Britain in the West Indies didn’t seem unrealistic. Massive preparations were underway for the invasion of Jamaica. In early April, Admiral Count de Grasse left Martinique with a strong fleet, carrying land troops and artillery meant for operations against the island. His plan was to join forces with the Spanish Admiral Don Solano, who was stationed at Hispaniola; after that, the combined fleet, which was expected to be overwhelmingly powerful, was set to embark on the important mission they had organized. However, on his way to Hispaniola, De Grasse was intercepted by Rodney and engaged in a battle where he was completely defeated and captured. This major victory disrupted the plans of the allied forces and secured the British islands. In the United States, there were concerns that this shift in the situation could affect the English cabinet's decisions on peace, and these worries heightened the anxiety that all informed individuals felt regarding the state of American finances.

It was then in contemplation to reduce the army, by which many of the officers would be discharged. While the general declared, in a confidential letter to the secretary of war, his conviction of the alacrity with which they would retire into private life, could they be placed in a situation as eligible as they had left to enter into the service, he added—"Yet I cannot help fearing the result of the measure, when I see such a number of men goaded by a thousand stings of reflection on the past, and of anticipation on the future, about to be turned on the world, soured by penury, and what they call the ingratitude of the public; involved in debts, without one farthing of money to carry them home, after having spent the flower of their days, and, many of them, their patrimonies, in establishing the freedom and independence of their country; and having suffered every thing which human nature is capable of enduring on this side of death. I repeat it, when I reflect on these irritating circumstances, unattended by one thing to soothe their feelings, or brighten the gloomy prospect, I cannot avoid apprehending that a train of evils will follow of a very serious and distressing nature.

It was then considered to reduce the army, which would result in many officers being let go. While the general expressed in a private letter to the secretary of war his belief that they would happily return to civilian life if they could find a situation as good as the one they left to join the service, he also added—"Yet I can’t help but worry about the outcome of this decision, when I see so many men tormented by countless regrets about the past and anxieties about the future, about to be thrown back into the world, bitter from poverty and what they perceive as public ingratitude; burdened by debts, with not a cent to get them home, after having sacrificed the prime of their lives and, for many, their inheritances, to secure the freedom and independence of their country; and having endured everything human nature can withstand short of death. I say again, when I think of these frustrating circumstances, with not a single thing to ease their emotions or lighten the bleak outlook, I can't help but fear that a serious and distressing series of problems will follow."

"I wish not to heighten the shades of the picture so far as the real life would justify me in doing, or I would give anecdotes of patriotism and distress which have scarcely ever been paralleled, never surpassed, in the history of mankind. But you may rely upon it, the patience and long sufferance of this army are almost exhausted, and there never was so great a spirit of discontent as at this instant. While in the field, I think it may be kept from breaking out into acts of outrage; but when we retire into winter quarters (unless the storm be previously dissipated) I can not be at ease respecting the consequences. It is high time for a peace."

"I don't want to exaggerate the situation more than real life would allow, but I could share stories of bravery and hardship that are rarely matched or exceeded in human history. However, you can trust that the patience and endurance of this army are almost gone, and there has never been such a strong sense of discontent as there is right now. While we're in the field, I think we can prevent it from turning into violence, but when we move into winter quarters (unless the current issues are resolved), I can’t feel at ease about what might happen next. It's definitely time for peace."

To judge rightly of the motives which produced this uneasy temper in the army, it will be necessary to recollect that the resolution of October, 1780, granting half pay for life to the officers, stood on the mere faith of a government possessing no funds enabling it to perform its engagements. From requisitions alone, to be made on sovereign states, the supplies were to be drawn which should satisfy these meritorious public creditors; and the ill success attending these requisitions while the dangers of war were still impending, furnished melancholy presages of their unproductiveness in time of peace. In addition to this reflection, of itself sufficient to disturb the tranquillity which the passage of the resolution had produced, were other considerations of decisive influence. The dispositions manifested by congress itself were so unfriendly to the half pay establishment as to extinguish the hope that any funds the government might acquire, would be applied to that object. Since the passage of the resolution, the articles of confederation, which required the concurrence of nine states to any act appropriating public money, had been adopted; and nine states had never been in favour of the measure. Should the requisitions of congress therefore be respected, or should permanent funds be granted by the states, the prevailing sentiment of the nation was too hostile to the compensation which had been stipulated, to leave a probability that it would be substantially made. This was not merely the sentiment of the individuals then administering the government, which might change with a change of men. It was known to be the sense of the states they represented; and consequently the hope could not be indulged that, on this subject, a future congress would be more just, or would think more liberally. As therefore the establishment of that independence for which they had fought and suffered appeared to become more certain,—as the end of their toils approached—the officers became more attentive to their own situation; and the inquietude of the army increased with the progress of the negotiation.

To properly understand the reasons behind the army's uneasy mood, it’s important to remember that the October 1780 decision to provide half pay for life to officers relied solely on the promise of a government that had no funds to keep its commitments. Supplies to meet the needs of these deserving creditors were meant to come from requisitions made to the sovereign states, but the poor results from these requests, even while the threat of war loomed, predicted a grim outcome in peacetime as well. Alongside this, there were other significant factors that disrupted the calm the resolution had initially brought. Congress's own actions showed a distinct lack of support for the half pay plan, dampening hopes that any funds the government might obtain would be used for that purpose. After the resolution was passed, the Articles of Confederation, requiring nine states to agree on any public spending, had been adopted, and no nine states had consistently backed this measure. Therefore, whether Congress's requisitions were honored or the states granted permanent funds, the prevailing national sentiment was too opposed to the promised compensation to make it likely. This wasn't just the view of the current leaders, which could shift with new people in power. It was widely understood to reflect the views of the states they represented; thus, there was little reason to believe that a future Congress would be fairer or more generous on this issue. As it became clearer that the independence they had fought for was within reach — and as the end of their struggles neared — the officers began to pay more attention to their own situations, and the anxiety within the army grew as negotiations progressed.

In October, the French troops marched to Boston, in order to embark for the West Indies; and the Americans retired into winter quarters. The apparent indisposition of the British general to act offensively, the pacific temper avowed by the cabinet of London, and the strength of the country in which the American troops were cantoned, gave ample assurance that no military operations would be undertaken during the winter, which could require the continuance of General Washington in camp. But the irritable temper of the army furnished cause for serious apprehension; and he determined to forego every gratification to be derived from a suspension of his toils, in order to watch its discontents.

In October, the French troops marched to Boston to get ready to head to the West Indies, and the Americans settled into their winter quarters. The lack of willingness from the British general to take offensive actions, the peaceful attitude declared by the London cabinet, and the robust support of the area where the American troops were stationed provided plenty of assurance that no military actions would take place over the winter that would require General Washington to stay in camp. However, the restless attitude of the army raised serious concerns, and he decided to give up any relief he could get from a break in his hard work to keep an eye on their discontent.

While the situation of the United States thus loudly called for peace, the negotiations in Europe were protracted by causes which, in America, were almost unknown, and which it would have been dangerous to declare. Although, so far as respected the dismemberment of the British empire, the war had been carried on with one common design, the ulterior views of the belligerent powers were not only different, but, in some respects, incompatible with each other. To depress a proud and hated rival was so eagerly desired by the house of Bourbon, that France and Spain might be disposed to continue hostilities for the attainment of objects in which America could feel no common interest. This circumstance, of itself, furnished motives for prolonging the war, after the causes in which it originated were removed; and additional delays were produced by the discordant views which were entertained in regard to those claims which were the subject of negotiation. These were, the boundaries which should be assigned to the United States, and the participation which should be allowed them in the fisheries. On both these points, the wishes of France and Spain were opposed to those of America; and the cabinets both of Versailles and Madrid, seemed disposed to intrigue with that of London, to prevent such ample concessions respecting them, as the British minister might be inclined to make.

While the situation in the United States clearly called for peace, the negotiations in Europe were drawn out by issues that were almost unknown in America and that it would have been risky to reveal. Even though, in terms of breaking up the British empire, the war had been waged with a common purpose, the long-term goals of the warring powers were not only different but, in some ways, conflicting. The Bourbon monarchy was so eager to weaken a proud and hated rival that France and Spain might be inclined to keep fighting for objectives that America had no shared interest in. This alone provided reasons to extend the war long after the initial causes had been resolved, and further delays came from the conflicting views held regarding the claims that were up for negotiation. These involved the boundaries that should be set for the United States and the extent of their participation in the fisheries. On both of these issues, the preferences of France and Spain clashed with those of America, and the governments in Versailles and Madrid appeared to be scheming with London to block any significant concessions that the British minister might be willing to offer.

Preliminary and eventual articles agreed upon between the United States and Great Britain.
Nov. 30.

After an intricate negotiation, in which the penetration, judgment, and firmness, of the American commissioners were eminently displayed, eventual and preliminary articles were signed on the 30th of November. By this treaty every reasonable wish of America, especially on the questions of boundary and of the fisheries, was gratified.

After a complex negotiation, where the insight, judgment, and determination of the American commissioners were clearly evident, the final and initial articles were signed on November 30th. This treaty fulfilled every sensible demand of America, particularly regarding the issues of boundaries and fisheries.

The liberality of the articles on these points attests the success which attended the endeavours of the plenipotentiaries of the United States, to prove that the real interests of England required that America should become independent in fact, as well as name; and that every cause of future discord between the two nations should be removed.

The openness of the articles on these issues shows the success of the U.S. delegates in demonstrating that England's true interests demanded that America become independent both in reality and name, and that all potential sources of future conflict between the two countries should be eliminated.

1783

The effect of this treaty was suspended until peace should be concluded between France and Great Britain. The connexions between their most Christian and Catholic Majesties not admitting of a separate peace on the part of either, the negotiations between the belligerent powers of Europe had been protracted by the persevering endeavours of Spain to obtain the cession of Gibraltar. At length, the formidable armament which had invested that fortress was repulsed with immense slaughter; after which the place was relieved by Lord Howe, and the besiegers abandoned the enterprise in despair. Negotiations were then taken up with sincerity; and preliminary articles of peace between Great Britain, France, and Spain, were signed on the 20th of January, 1783.

The effect of this treaty was put on hold until peace was reached between France and Great Britain. The connections between their most Christian and Catholic Majesties didn’t allow for a separate peace from either side, so the negotiations between the warring powers of Europe dragged on because Spain was persistently trying to gain control of Gibraltar. Eventually, the massive army that had surrounded that fortress was driven back with heavy losses; after that, Lord Howe relieved the place, and the attackers gave up their efforts in despair. Sincere negotiations then resumed, and preliminary articles of peace between Great Britain, France, and Spain were signed on January 20, 1783.

Discontents of the American Army.

In America, the approach of peace, combined with other causes, produced a state of things alike interesting and critical. The officers who had wasted their fortunes and their prime of life in unrewarded service, fearing, with reason, that congress possessed neither the power nor the inclination to comply with its engagements to the army, could not look with unconcern at the prospect which was opening to them. In December, soon after going into winter quarters, they presented a petition to congress, respecting the money actually due to them, and proposing a commutation of the half pay stipulated by the resolutions of October, 1780, for a sum in gross, which, they nattered themselves, would encounter fewer prejudices than the half pay establishment. Some security that the engagements of the government would be complied with was also requested. A committee of officers was deputed to solicit the attention of congress to this memorial, and to attend its progress through the house.

In America, the push for peace, along with other issues, created a situation that was both fascinating and critical. The officers who had spent their fortunes and the best years of their lives in unrecognized service, justifiably worried that Congress lacked both the power and the desire to fulfill its promises to the army, could not remain indifferent to the situation that lay ahead. In December, shortly after settling into winter quarters, they submitted a petition to Congress regarding the money owed to them and suggested exchanging the half pay agreed upon in the resolutions of October 1780 for a lump sum, which they believed would face less opposition than the half pay system. They also requested some assurance that the government's commitments would be honored. A committee of officers was assigned to bring this memorial to Congress's attention and to oversee its progress through the house.

Among the most distinguished members of the federal government, were persons sincerely disposed to do ample justice to the public creditors generally, and to that class of them particularly whose claims were founded in military service. But many viewed the army with jealous eyes, acknowledged its merit with unwillingness, and betrayed, involuntarily, their repugnance to a faithful observance of the public engagements. With this question, another of equal importance was connected, on which congress was divided almost in the same manner. One party was attached to a state, the other to a continental system. The latter laboured to fund the public debts on solid continental security, while the former opposed their whole weight to measures calculated to effect that object.

Among the most recognized members of the federal government were individuals genuinely committed to fairly compensating public creditors overall, especially those whose claims were based on military service. However, many regarded the army with suspicion, reluctantly acknowledged its value, and unconsciously revealed their aversion to honoring public commitments. This issue was linked to another equally significant matter that divided Congress in a similar way. One group was loyal to state interests, while the other supported a continental approach. The latter worked to secure public debts with solid continental backing, while the former resisted any efforts aimed at achieving that goal.

In consequence of these divisions on points of the deepest interest, the business of the army advanced slowly, and the important question respecting the commutation of their half pay remained undecided, when intelligence was received of the signature of the preliminary and eventual articles of peace between the United States and Great Britain.

Due to these disagreements on crucial issues, the army's progress was slow, and the important matter regarding the change of their half pay was still unresolved when news came in about the signing of the preliminary and final articles of peace between the United States and Great Britain.

Anonymous letters and the proceedings in consequence thereof.

The officers, soured by their past sufferings, their present wants, and their gloomy prospects—exasperated by the neglect which they experienced, and the injustice which they apprehended, manifested an irritable and uneasy temper, which required only a slight impulse to give it activity. To render this temper the more dangerous, an opinion had been insinuated that the Commander-in-chief was restrained, by extreme delicacy, from supporting their interests with that zeal which his feelings and knowledge of their situation had inspired. Early in March, a letter was received from their committee in Philadelphia, showing that the objects they solicited had not been obtained. On the 10th of that month, an anonymous paper was circulated, requiring a meeting of the general and field officers at the public building on the succeeding day at eleven in the morning; and announcing the expectation that an officer from each company, and a delegate from the medical staff would attend. The object of the meeting was avowed to be, "to consider the late letter from their representatives in Philadelphia, and what measures (if any) should be adopted to obtain that redress of grievances which they seemed to have solicited in vain."

The officers, frustrated by their past hardships, current needs, and bleak future—aggravated by the neglect they faced and the unfairness they feared—showed an irritable and restless attitude that only needed a small push to ignite it. To make this attitude even more dangerous, it was suggested that the Commander-in-chief was held back, out of excessive caution, from advocating for their interests with the enthusiasm that his feelings and understanding of their situation warranted. Early in March, a letter from their committee in Philadelphia was received, indicating that the goals they sought had not been met. On the 10th of that month, an anonymous notice was spread, calling for a meeting of the general and field officers at the public building the next day at eleven in the morning; it also stated that they expected an officer from each company and a representative from the medical staff to attend. The purpose of the meeting was made clear: "to discuss the recent letter from their representatives in Philadelphia and what actions (if any) should be taken to seek the redress of grievances they appeared to have requested in vain."

On the same day an address to the army was privately circulated, which was admirably well calculated to work on the passions of the moment, and to lead to the most desperate resolutions. Full justice can not be done to this eloquent paper without inserting it entire.

On the same day, a speech to the army was shared privately, which was incredibly well designed to tap into the emotions of the moment and to inspire the most desperate decisions. You can’t fully appreciate this powerful document without reading it in full.

"To the officers of the army.

"To the officers of the army."

"Gentlemen,

"Guys,"

"A fellow soldier, whose interests and affections bend him strongly to you, whose past sufferings have been as great, and whose future fortune may be as desperate as yours, would beg leave to address you.

"A fellow soldier, who cares for you deeply and shares similar struggles, and whose future may be just as uncertain as yours, would like to speak with you."

"Age has its claims, and rank is not without its pretensions, to advise; but though unsupported by both, he flatters himself that the plain language of sincerity and experience will neither be unheard nor unregarded.

"Age has its rights, and status has its expectations to give advice; but even without support from either, he believes that the simple truth of sincerity and experience will not go unnoticed or unappreciated."

"Like many of you, he loved private life, and left it with regret. He left it, determined to retire from the field with the necessity that called him to it, and not until then—not until the enemies of his country, the slaves of power, and the hirelings of injustice, were compelled to abandon their schemes, and acknowledge America as terrible in arms as she had been humble in remonstrance. With this object in view, he has long shared in your toils, and mingled in your dangers. He has felt the cold hand of poverty without a murmur, and has seen the insolence of wealth without a sigh. But too much under the direction of his wishes, and sometimes weak enough to mistake desire for opinion, he has until lately—very lately—believed in the justice of his country. He hoped that, as the clouds of adversity scattered, and as the sunshine of peace and better fortune broke in upon us, the coldness and severity of government would relax, and that more than justice, that gratitude would blaze forth upon those hands which had upheld her in the darkest stages of her passage from impending servitude to acknowledged independence. But faith has its limits, as well as temper, and there are points beyond which neither can be stretched without sinking into cowardice, or plunging into credulity. This, my friends, I conceive to be your situation. Hurried to the very verge of both, another step would ruin you for ever. To be tame and unprovoked when injuries press hard upon you, is more than weakness; but to look up for kinder usage without one manly effort of your own, would fix your character, and show the world how richly you deserve those chains you broke. To guard against this evil, let us take a review of the ground upon which we now stand, and from thence carry our thoughts forward for a moment into the unexplored field of expedient.

"Like many of you, he cherished his private life and left it reluctantly. He stepped away, determined to retire only when it was necessary, not until the enemies of his country, the slaves to power, and the agents of injustice were forced to abandon their plans and recognize America as strong in battle as she had been humble in complaint. With this goal in sight, he has long shared in your struggles and faced your dangers. He has endured the harshness of poverty without complaint and has witnessed the arrogance of wealth without a sigh. But too often, driven by his desires and sometimes mistaking wishful thinking for true beliefs, he has until very recently believed in the justice of his country. He hoped that as the hardships faded and the light of peace and better times emerged, the coldness and severity of the government would ease, and that more than mere justice, gratitude would shine upon those who supported her through the darkest times of her journey from impending servitude to recognized independence. But faith has its limits, just like temper, and there are points beyond which neither can be extended without falling into cowardice or naïveté. This, my friends, is how I see your situation. Pushed to the edge of both, one more misstep would ruin you forever. To be submissive and unprovoked while being hurt is more than just weakness; but to expect better treatment without making any strong effort yourself would define your character, showing the world how much you deserve the chains you broke. To prevent this danger, let’s review the ground we currently occupy and then take a moment to think about the unexplored possibilities ahead."

"After a pursuit of seven long years, the object for which we set out is at length brought within our reach.—Yes, my friends, that suffering courage of yours was active once.—It has conducted the United States of America through a doubtful and a bloody war.—It has placed her in the chair of independency; and peace returns again to bless—whom?—A country willing to redress your wrongs, cherish your worth, and reward your services? A country courting your return to private life with tears of gratitude and smiles of admiration—longing to divide with you that independency which your gallantry has given, and those riches which your wounds have preserved? Is this the case? Or is it rather a country that tramples upon your rights, disdains your cries, and insults your distresses? Have you not more than once suggested your wishes and made known your wants to congress? Wants and wishes which gratitude and policy would have anticipated rather than evaded; and have you not lately, in the meek language of entreating memorials, begged from their justice what you could no longer expect from their favour? How have you been answered? Let the letter which you are called to consider to-morrow reply.

"After seven long years of struggle, the goal we set out to achieve is finally within our reach. Yes, my friends, your enduring courage was once very much alive. It has led the United States of America through a challenging and bloody war. It has secured her independence, and peace is once again ready to bless—whom? A country prepared to address your grievances, appreciate your contributions, and reward your sacrifices? A country eager for your return to civilian life with tears of gratitude and smiles of admiration—yearning to share with you the independence your bravery has won and the wealth your sacrifices have preserved? Is this the reality? Or is it instead a country that disregards your rights, ignores your pleas, and mocks your suffering? Haven't you repeatedly expressed your wishes and communicated your needs to Congress? Needs and wishes that gratitude and strategy should have addressed rather than avoided; and haven’t you recently, in humble requests, appealed to their justice for what you could no longer expect from their favor? How have you been responded to? Let the letter you are set to review tomorrow answer that."

"If this then be your treatment while the swords you wear are necessary for the defence of America, what have you to expect from peace, when your voice shall sink, and your strength dissipate by division? When those very swords, the instruments and companions of your glory, shall be taken from your sides, and no remaining mark of military distinction left but your wants, infirmities, and scars? Can you then consent to be the only sufferers by this revolution, and, retiring from the field, grow old in poverty, wretchedness, and contempt? Can you consent to wade through the vile mire of dependency, and owe the miserable remnant of that life to charity which has hitherto been spent in honour? If you can—go—and carry with you the jest of tories, and the scorn of whigs;—the ridicule, and, what is worse, the pity of the world. Go,—starve and be forgotten. But if your spirit should revolt at this; if you have sense enough to discover, and spirit enough to oppose, tyranny under whatever garb it may assume; whether it be the plain coat of republicanism, or the splendid robe of royalty; if you have yet learned to discriminate between a people and a cause, between men and principles,—awake; attend to your situation, and redress yourselves. If the present moment be lost, every future effort is in vain; and your threats then will be as empty as your entreaties now.

"If this is how you’re treated while the swords you carry are necessary for defending America, what can you expect from peace when your voice fades and your strength diminishes through division? When those very swords, the symbols and companions of your honor, are taken from you, and all that remains of military distinction are your needs, weaknesses, and scars? Can you agree to be the only ones suffering from this revolution, and, stepping back from the battlefield, grow old in poverty, misery, and disdain? Can you withstand wading through the filthy mire of dependence, having the miserable residue of your life owed to charity when it was previously spent in honor? If you can—go—and take with you the laughter of loyalists and the disdain of patriots; the mockery, and worse, the pity of the world. Go—starve and be forgotten. But if your spirit rebels against this; if you have enough sense to recognize, and enough spirit to resist, tyranny in whatever form it takes; whether it’s the simple garment of republicanism or the grand robe of royalty; if you have learned to distinguish between people and a cause, between individuals and principles—wake up; pay attention to your circumstances, and take action for yourselves. If this moment is lost, every future effort will be pointless; and your threats then will be as hollow as your pleas are now."

"I would advise you therefore to come to some final opinion upon what you can bear, and what you will suffer. If your determination be in any proportion to your wrongs, carry your appeal from the justice to the fears of the government. Change the milk-and-water style of your last memorial. Assume a bolder tone,—decent, but lively, spirited, and determined; and suspect the man who would advise to more moderation and longer forbearance. Let two or three men who can feel as well as write, be appointed to draw up your last remonstrance; for I would no longer give it the sueing, soft, unsuccessful epithet of memorial. Let it be represented in language that will neither dishonour you by its rudeness, nor betray you by its fears, what has been promised by congress, and what has been performed;—how long and how patiently you have suffered;—how little you have asked, and how much of that little has been denied. Tell them that, though you were the first, and would wish to be the last to encounter danger; though despair itself can never drive you into dishonour, it may drive you from the field;—that the wound often irritated and never healed, may at length become incurable; and that the slightest mark of indignity from congress now must operate like the grave, and part you forever; that in any political event, the army has its alternative. If peace, that nothing shall separate you from your arms but death; if war, that courting the auspices, and inviting the directions of your illustrious leader, you will retire to some unsettled country, smile in your turn, and 'mock when their fear cometh on.' But let it represent also that, should they comply with the request of your late memorial, it would make you more happy and them more respectable. That while war should continue you would follow their standard into the field; and when it came to an end, you would withdraw into the shade of private life, and give the world another subject of wonder and applause;—an army victorious over its enemies, victorious over itself."

"I would advise you to come to a final decision about what you can tolerate and what you will endure. If your determination reflects your wrongs, take your appeal from seeking justice to appealing to the government's fears. Change the soft and ineffective tone of your last message. Take a bolder stance—appropriate, but lively, spirited, and resolute; and be wary of anyone who advises you to be more moderate or patient. Appoint two or three people who can feel as deeply as they can write to draft your last remonstrance; I would no longer call it the ineffective and passive term of memorial. It should clearly convey in language that neither dishonors you with its harshness nor reveals your fears, what Congress has promised and what has actually been delivered;—how long and how patiently you have suffered;—how little you have asked, and how much of that little has been denied. Tell them that, even though you were the first to face danger and would prefer to be the last, despair will never drive you into dishonor, but it may push you off the battlefield;—that a wound that remains irritated and never heals may ultimately become incurable; and that even the slightest act of disrespect from Congress now will be like a grave and part you from one another forever; that under any political outcome, the army has its options. If there is peace, then nothing shall separate you from your arms but death; if it’s war, then in seeking the guidance of your respected leader, you will retreat to some unsettled land, smiling as you turn around and 'mock when their fear comes.' But it should also express that if they fulfill the request in your recent message, it would make you happier and them more respected. That while the war continues, you would follow their standard into battle; and when it ends, you would step back into private life, providing the world with another source of wonder and respect—an army victorious over its enemies, victorious over itself."

Persuaded as the officers in general were of the indisposition of government to remunerate their services, this eloquent and impassioned address, dictated by genius and by feeling, found in almost every bosom a kindred though latent sentiment prepared to receive its impression. Quick as the train to which a torch is applied, the passions caught its flame, and nothing seemed to be required but the assemblage proposed for the succeeding day, to communicate the conflagration to the combustible mass, and to produce an explosion ruinous to the army and to the nation.

Convinced as the officers generally were of the government's unwillingness to compensate them for their services, this powerful and emotional speech, inspired by talent and deep feeling, resonated with almost everyone, tapping into a shared but hidden sentiment ready to be ignited. Just like a fuse that catches fire from a torch, their passions ignited, and it seemed that all that was needed was the gathering planned for the following day to spread the fire to the volatile situation, leading to a disastrous explosion for both the army and the nation.

Fortunately, the Commander-in-chief was in camp. His characteristic firmness and decision did not forsake him in this crisis. The occasion required that his measures should be firm, but prudent and conciliatory,—evincive of his fixed determination to oppose any rash proceedings, but calculated to assuage the irritation which was excited, and to restore confidence in government.

Fortunately, the Commander-in-Chief was in camp. His typical firmness and decisiveness didn't leave him in this crisis. The situation needed him to take strong, yet careful and understanding actions—showing his firm resolve to oppose any reckless moves while also aiming to calm the rising frustrations and restore trust in the government.

Knowing well that it was much easier to avoid intemperate measures than to correct them, he thought it of essential importance to prevent the immediate meeting of the officers; but, knowing also that a sense of injury and a fear of injustice had made a deep impression on them, and that their sensibilities were all alive to the proceedings of congress on their memorial, he thought it more adviseable to guide their deliberations on that interesting subject, than to discountenance them.

Knowing that it was much easier to prevent rash actions than to fix them, he believed it was crucial to stop the officers from meeting right away. However, he also understood that their feelings of hurt and fear of unfair treatment had affected them deeply and that they were very aware of Congress's actions regarding their petition. Therefore, he felt it was better to guide their discussions on that important topic instead of discouraging them.

With these views, he noticed in his orders, the anonymous paper proposing a meeting of the officers, and expressed his conviction that their good sense would secure them from paying any "attention to such an irregular invitation; but his own duty, he conceived, as well as the reputation and true interest of the army, required his disapprobation of such disorderly proceedings. At the same time, he requested the general and field officers, with one officer from each company, and a proper representation from the staff of the army, to assemble at twelve on Saturday, the 15th, at the new building, to hear the report of the committee deputed by the army to congress. After mature deliberation they will devise what farther measures ought to be adopted as most rational and best calculated to obtain the just and important object in view." The senior officer in rank present was directed to preside, and report the result of the deliberations to the Commander-in-chief.

With these thoughts, he noticed in his orders the anonymous paper proposing a meeting of the officers, and he expressed his belief that their common sense would prevent them from paying any attention to such an irregular invitation. However, he felt it was his duty, as well as important for the reputation and true interests of the army, to disapprove of such disorderly proceedings. At the same time, he requested the general and field officers, along with one officer from each company and a proper representation from the army's staff, to gather at twelve on Saturday, the 15th, at the new building to hear the report from the committee sent by the army to Congress. After thoughtful discussion, they would determine what further actions should be taken to achieve the important goal in mind. The highest-ranking officer present was tasked with leading the meeting and reporting the outcomes to the Commander-in-chief.

The day succeeding that on which these orders were published, a second anonymous address appeared, from the same pen which had written the first. Its author, acquainted with the discontents of the army, did not seem to despair of impelling the officers to the desired point. He affected to consider the orders in a light favourable to his views:—"as giving system to their proceedings, and stability to their resolves."

The day after these orders were published, a second anonymous message appeared, written by the same person who wrote the first. The author, aware of the army's frustrations, didn't seem to lose hope in pushing the officers toward the desired goal. He pretended to see the orders as beneficial to his views:—"as providing structure to their actions and firmness to their decisions."

But Washington would not permit himself to be misunderstood. The interval between his orders and the general meeting they invited, was employed in impressing on those officers individually who possessed the greatest share of the general confidence, a just sense of the true interests of the army; and the whole weight of his influence was exerted to calm the agitations of the moment, and conduct them to a happy termination. This was a work of no inconsiderable difficulty. So convinced were many that government designed to deal unfairly by them, that only the reliance they placed on their general, and their attachment to his person and character, could have moderated their resentments so far as to induce them to adopt the measures he recommended.

But Washington wouldn’t allow himself to be misunderstood. The time between his orders and the general meeting they called was spent making sure that the officers who had the most confidence from the general understood the real interests of the army. He used all of his influence to calm the current unrest and guide them toward a positive outcome. This was no easy task. Many were so convinced that the government intended to treat them unfairly that only their trust in their general and their loyalty to him could have kept their anger in check enough to encourage them to follow the measures he suggested.

On the 15th, the convention of officers assembled, and General Gates[14] took the chair. The Commander-in-chief then addressed them in the following terms.

On the 15th, the officers' convention gathered, and General Gates[14] took charge. The Commander-in-chief then spoke to them using the following words.

"Gentlemen,—

"Hey everyone,"

"By an anonymous summons, an attempt has been made to convene you together. How inconsistent with the rules of propriety, how unmilitary, and how subversive of all order and discipline, let the good sense of the army decide.

"Through an anonymous call, there has been an attempt to gather you all. How inconsistent with the rules of decency, how unprofessional, and how undermining of all order and discipline, let the common sense of the army determine."

"In the moment of this summons, another anonymous production was sent into circulation, addressed more to the feelings and passions than to the judgment of the army. The author of the piece is entitled to much credit for the goodness of his pen; and I could wish he had as much credit for the rectitude of his heart; for as men see through different optics, and are induced by the reflecting faculties of the mind, to use different means to attain the same end, the author of the address should have had more charity, than to mark for suspicion the man who should recommend moderation and longer forbearance; or, in other words, who should not think as he thinks, and act as he advises. But he had another plan in view, in which candour and liberality of sentiment, regard to justice, and love of country, have no part; and he was right to insinuate the darkest suspicion to effect the blackest design. That the address was drawn with great art, and is designed to answer the most insidious purposes; that it is calculated to impress the mind with an idea of premeditated injustice, in the sovereign power of the United States, and rouse all those resentments which must unavoidably flow from such a belief; that the secret mover of this scheme, whoever he may be, intended to take advantage of the passions, while they were warmed by the recollection of past distresses, without giving time for cool deliberate thinking, and that composure of mind which is so necessary to give dignity and stability to measures, is rendered too obvious by the mode of conducting the business to need other proof than a reference to the proceedings.

"In this moment of calling, another anonymous piece was circulated, aimed more at stirring the feelings and passions than at appealing to the army's judgment. The author deserves a lot of credit for his writing skills; I just wish he had as much credit for his integrity. People see things through different lenses, and because of the way we think, we often use various methods to achieve the same goals. The author of this message should have shown more kindness rather than labeling as suspicious anyone who advocates for moderation and patience, or in simpler terms, those who don't share his views or follow his advice. However, he had a different agenda in mind, one that doesn't include honesty, fairness, justice, or love for the country; and he was right to instill the worst suspicions to carry out his sinister plans. The address was crafted very skillfully for deceptive purposes; it aims to create a belief in intentional injustice by the governing power of the United States and to provoke the anger that naturally arises from such a belief. The mastermind behind this scheme, whoever they are, wanted to exploit the emotions stirred by memories of past hardships, without allowing time for rational thought and the calmness necessary for dignity and stability in decision-making. This intention is made obvious by the way the situation is being handled and doesn’t need any other evidence than looking at the proceedings."

"Thus much, gentlemen, I have thought it incumbent on me to observe to you, to show upon what principles I opposed the irregular and hasty meeting which was proposed to have been held on Tuesday last, and not because I wanted a disposition to give you every opportunity consistent with your own honour, and the dignity of the army, to make known your grievances. If my conduct heretofore has not evinced to you, that I have been a faithful friend to the army, my declaration of it at this time would be equally unavailing and improper. But as I was among the first who embarked in the cause of our common country; as I have never left your side one moment but when called from you on public duty; as I have been the constant companion and witness of your distresses, and not among the last to feel and acknowledge your merits; as I have ever considered my own military reputation as inseparably connected with that of the army; as my heart has ever expanded with joy when I have heard its praises, and my indignation has arisen when the mouth of detraction has been opened against it; it can scarcely be supposed, at this last stage of the war, that I am indifferent to its interests. But how are they to be promoted? The way is plain, says the anonymous addresser.—If war continues, remove into the unsettled country; there establish yourselves, and leave an ungrateful country to defend itself! But who are they to defend? Our wives, our children, our farms and other property which we leave behind us? Or, in this state of hostile separation, are we to take the two first (the latter can not be removed) to perish in a wilderness with hunger, cold, and nakedness?

" gentlemen, I felt it necessary to explain why I opposed the irregular and rushed meeting that was supposed to happen last Tuesday, not because I didn’t want you to have every chance, respecting your honor and the dignity of the army, to express your grievances. If my actions up until now haven’t shown you that I’ve been a loyal friend to the army, then stating that now would be pointless and inappropriate. But since I was one of the first to join the fight for our country; since I’ve never left your side except when pulled away for public duty; since I’ve been there to witness your struggles and not among the last to recognize your worth; since I’ve always believed my own military reputation is tied to that of the army; since my heart has always swelled with pride when I’ve heard praise for it, and my anger has flared up when it faced criticism; it’s hard to believe that I would be indifferent to its interests at this critical point in the war. But how can we protect it? The anonymous writer claims to have the answer. If the war continues, we should move to the unsettled lands; set up there and leave an ungrateful country to defend itself! But who would they defend? Our wives, our children, our farms, and other belongings we abandon? Or, in this state of hostile separation, are we to abandon the first two (the last can’t be moved) to suffer in the wilderness with hunger, cold, and exposure?"

"'If peace takes place, never sheath your swords,' says he, 'until you have obtained full and ample justice.' This dreadful alternative of either deserting our country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our arms against it, which is the apparent object, unless Congress can be compelled into instant compliance, has something so shocking in it, that humanity revolts at the idea. My God! what can this writer have in view by recommending such measures. Can he be a friend to the army? Can he be a friend to this country? Rather is he not an insidious foe: some emissary, perhaps, from New York, plotting the ruin of both, by sowing the seeds of discord and separation between the civil and military powers of the continent? And what a compliment does he pay to our understandings, when he recommends measures, in either alternative, impracticable in their nature? But here, gentlemen, I will drop the curtain, because it would be as imprudent in me to assign my reasons for this opinion, as it would be insulting to your conception to suppose you stood in need of them. A moment's reflection will convince every dispassionate mind of the physical impossibility of carrying either proposal into execution. There might, gentlemen, be an impropriety in my taking notice, in this address to you, of an anonymous production,—but the manner in which that performance has been introduced to the army, together with some other circumstances, will amply justify my observations on the tendency of that writing.

"'If peace happens, never put away your swords,' he says, 'until you have achieved full and complete justice.' This terrible choice of either abandoning our country in its most desperate hour or turning our weapons against it, which seems to be the goal unless Congress can be forced into immediate action, is so shocking that it makes one recoil at the thought. My God! what could this writer be thinking by suggesting such actions? Can he truly be a friend to the army? Can he genuinely care about this country? Instead, isn't he a secret enemy: perhaps an agent from New York, plotting the downfall of both by creating conflict and division between the civil and military authorities of the continent? And what a disservice he does to our intelligence by proposing measures that are impossible to carry out in either case? But here, gentlemen, I will stop, because it would be just as foolish for me to explain my reasons for this view as it would be insulting for me to assume you need them. A moment's thought will convince any reasonable person of the physical impossibility of executing either proposal. There might, gentlemen, be an inappropriateness in my addressing an anonymous piece in this speech to you—but the way that writing has been presented to the army, along with some other factors, will fully justify my comments on the influence of that text.

"With respect to the advice given by the author, to suspect the man who shall recommend moderate measures and longer forbearance, I spurn it, as every man who regards that liberty, and reveres that justice for which we contend, undoubtedly must; for if men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us. The freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent, we may be led like sheep to the slaughter. I can not in justice to my own belief, and what I have great reason to conceive is the intention of congress, conclude this address, without giving it as my decided opinion, that that honourable body entertain exalted sentiments of the services of the army, and, from a full conviction of its merits and sufferings, will do it complete justice. That their endeavours to discover and establish funds for this purpose have been unwearied, and will not cease until they have succeeded, I have not a doubt.

"Regarding the advice from the author to be wary of those who suggest moderate actions and prolonged patience, I completely reject it, as anyone who values liberty and respects the justice we fight for undoubtedly must; because if people are barred from expressing their opinions on issues that could have the most serious and alarming outcomes for humanity, then reason is useless to us. Our freedom of speech could be taken away, and we could be led silently like sheep to slaughter. I cannot justly conclude this address without stating my firm belief that the honorable body acknowledges the tremendous contributions of the army and, fully aware of its merits and sacrifices, will ensure it receives proper recognition. I have no doubt that their efforts to find and secure funds for this purpose have been tireless and will continue until they succeed."

"But, like all other large bodies, where there is a variety of different interests to reconcile, their determinations are slow. Why then should we distrust them? And, in consequence of that distrust, adopt measures which may cast a shade over that glory which has been so justly acquired, and tarnish the reputation of an army which is celebrated through all Europe for its fortitude and patriotism? And for what is this done? To bring the object we seek nearer? No: most certainly, in my opinion, it will cast it at a greater distance. For myself, (and I take no merit in giving the assurance, being induced to it from principles of gratitude, veracity, and justice, and a grateful sense of the confidence you have ever placed in me,) a recollection of the cheerful assistance, and prompt obedience I have experienced from you, under every vicissitude of fortune, and the sincere affection I feel for an army I have so long had the honour to command, will oblige me to declare in this public and solemn manner, that in the attainment of complete justice for all your toils and dangers, and in the gratification of every wish, so far as may be done consistently with the great duty I owe my country, and those powers we are bound to respect, you may freely command my services to the utmost extent of my abilities.

"But, like any large group where there are many different interests to balance, their decisions take time. So, why should we doubt them? And because of that doubt, take actions that could overshadow the glory they've rightfully earned and damage the reputation of an army that's renowned across Europe for its strength and patriotism? And for what purpose is this done? To bring our goals closer? No, in my view, it will only push them further away. As for me, (and I don’t say this to seek praise, but out of gratitude, honesty, and fairness, and a genuine appreciation for the trust you’ve always shown in me), the memory of the support and quick response I’ve received from you through all the ups and downs, along with the true affection I feel for an army I’ve had the honor to lead for so long, compels me to publicly and solemnly declare that in pursuing complete justice for all your hard work and sacrifices, and in meeting every wish, as far as I can while respecting my duties to my country and the authorities we must honor, you can fully count on my support to the best of my ability."

"While I give these assurances, and pledge myself in the most unequivocal manner to exert whatever abilities I am possessed of in your favour, let me entreat you, gentlemen, on your part, not to take any measures which, viewed in the calm light of reason, will lessen the dignity, and sully the glory you have hitherto maintained. Let me request you to rely on the plighted faith of your country, and place a full confidence in the purity of the intentions of congress;—that, previous to your dissolution as an army, they will cause all your accounts to be fairly liquidated, as directed in the resolutions which were published to you two days ago; and that they will adopt the most effectual measures in their power to render ample justice to you for your faithful and meritorious services. And let me conjure you, in the name of our common country, as you value your own honour, as you respect the rights of humanity, and as you regard the military and national character of America, to express your utmost horror and detestation of the man who wishes, under any specious pretences, to overturn the liberties of our country, and who wickedly attempts to open the flood gates of civil discord, and deluge our rising empire in blood.

"While I make these promises and fully commit to using my abilities in your favor, I urge you, gentlemen, not to take any actions that, when viewed with reason, would diminish your dignity and tarnish the glory you have upheld so far. I ask you to trust in the commitment of your country and to place your full confidence in the good intentions of Congress; that, before you disband as an army, they will ensure all your accounts are settled fairly, as stated in the resolutions published to you two days ago; and that they will take effective steps to deliver just compensation for your loyal and commendable services. And I implore you, in the name of our shared country, as you value your own honor, respect humanity's rights, and consider the military and national character of America, to express your utmost horror and disgust for anyone who, under any false pretenses, seeks to undermine our country's freedoms and who maliciously attempts to unleash civil strife, thereby flooding our emerging nation with blood."

"By thus determining, and thus acting, you will pursue the plain and direct road to the attainment of your wishes; you will defeat the insidious designs of our enemies, who are compelled to resort from open force to secret artifice. You will give one more distinguished proof of unexampled patriotism and patient virtue, rising superior to the pressure of the most complicated sufferings; and you will by the dignity of your conduct, afford occasion for posterity to say, when speaking of the glorious example you have exhibited to mankind, had this day been wanting, the world had never seen the last stage of perfection to which human nature is capable of attaining."

"By making these decisions and taking action, you will take the straightforward path to achieving your goals; you will thwart the hidden plans of our enemies, who are forced to shift from open attacks to secret schemes. You will provide yet another remarkable example of unparalleled patriotism and enduring virtue, rising above the challenges of the most complicated hardships; and through the dignity of your actions, you will give future generations the opportunity to say that, had this day not happened, the world would never have witnessed the ultimate level of perfection that human nature can achieve."

These sentiments from a person whom the army had been accustomed to love, to revere, and to obey; the solidity of whose judgment, and the sincerity of whose zeal for their interests, were alike unquestioned, could not fail to be irresistible. No person was hardy enough to oppose the advice he had given; and the general impression was apparent. A resolution moved by General Knox, and seconded by Brigadier General Putnam, "assuring him that the officers reciprocated his affectionate expressions with the greatest sincerity of which the human heart is capable," was unanimously voted. On the motion of General Putnam, a committee consisting of General Knox, Colonel Brooks, and Captain Howard was then appointed, to prepare resolutions on the business before them, and to report in half an hour. The report of the committee being brought in and considered, the following resolutions were passed.

These feelings from someone the army had learned to love, respect, and follow; whose judgment was solid and whose passion for their well-being was beyond question, were hard to resist. No one was brave enough to oppose his advice, and it was clear how everyone felt. A resolution put forward by General Knox, and supported by Brigadier General Putnam, "assuring him that the officers responded to his heartfelt words with the deepest sincerity possible," was voted on unanimously. At General Putnam’s suggestion, a committee made up of General Knox, Colonel Brooks, and Captain Howard was formed to draft resolutions regarding the matter and report back in half an hour. After reviewing the committee's report, the following resolutions were approved.

"Resolved unanimously, that at the commencement of the present war, the officers of the American army engaged in the service of their country from the purest love and attachment to the rights and privileges of human nature; which motives still exist in the highest degree; and that no circumstances of distress or danger shall induce a conduct that may tend to sully the reputation and glory which they have acquired at the price of their blood, and eight years faithful services.

"Resolved unanimously, that at the start of the current war, the officers of the American army are serving their country out of a deep love and commitment to the rights and privileges of all people; these motivations still remain as strong as ever; and that nothing—no matter how distressing or dangerous—will lead to actions that could tarnish the reputation and glory they have earned through their sacrifices and eight years of dedicated service."

"Resolved unanimously, that the army continue to have an unshaken confidence in the justice of congress and their country, and are fully convinced that the representatives of America will not disband or disperse the army until their accounts are liquidated, the balances accurately ascertained, and adequate funds established for payment; and in this arrangement, the officers expect that the half pay, or a commutation for it, shall be efficaciously comprehended.

"Resolved unanimously, that the army continues to have unwavering confidence in the fairness of Congress and their country, and are fully convinced that America's representatives will not disband or scatter the army until their accounts are settled, the balances accurately determined, and sufficient funds secured for payment; and in this arrangement, the officers expect that the half pay, or a compensation for it, will be effectively included."

"Resolved unanimously, that his excellency the Commander-in-chief, be requested to write to his excellency the president of congress, earnestly entreating the most speedy decision of that honourable body upon the subject of our late address, which was forwarded by a committee of the army, some of whom are waiting upon congress for the result. In the alternative of peace or war, this event would be highly satisfactory, and would produce immediate tranquillity in the minds of the army, and prevent any farther machinations of designing men, to sow discord between the civil and military powers of the United States.

"Resolved unanimously, that the Commander-in-chief is requested to write to the president of Congress, urgently asking for a quick decision from that honorable body regarding our recent address, which was sent by a committee from the army, some of whom are waiting for a response from Congress. Whether the outcome is peace or war, this would be very satisfactory and would bring immediate calm to the minds of the army, preventing any further schemes by those trying to create conflict between the civil and military authorities of the United States."

"On motion, resolved unanimously, that the officers of the American army view with abhorrence and reject with disdain, the infamous propositions contained in a late anonymous address to the officers of the army, and resent with indignation the secret attempts of some unknown person to collect the officers together in a manner totally subversive of all discipline and good order.

"On motion, it was resolved unanimously that the officers of the American army view with disgust and reject with contempt the disgraceful proposals in a recent anonymous letter to the officers, and express their anger at the secret efforts of some unknown individual to gather the officers in a way that completely undermines discipline and order."

"Resolved unanimously, that the thanks of the officers of the army be given to the committee who presented to congress the late address of the army; for the wisdom and prudence with which they have conducted that business; and that a copy of the proceedings of this day be transmitted by the president to Major General M'Dougal; and that he be requested to continue his solicitations at congress until the objects of his mission are accomplished."

"Resolved unanimously, that the army officers extend their thanks to the committee that presented the army's recent address to Congress; for the wisdom and carefulness with which they handled this matter; and that a copy of today’s proceedings be sent by the president to Major General M'Dougal; and that he be asked to keep advocating to Congress until the goals of his mission are achieved."

The storm which had been raised so suddenly and unexpectedly being thus happily dissipated, the Commander-in-chief exerted all his influence in support of the application the officers had made to congress. The following letter, written by him on the occasion, will show that he was not impelled to this measure by the engagements he had entered into more strongly than by his feelings.

The storm that had suddenly and unexpectedly appeared was happily cleared away, and the Commander-in-chief used all his influence to support the officers' request to Congress. The following letter, written by him on this occasion, will show that he was motivated by his feelings just as much as by the commitments he had made.

"The result of the proceedings of the grand convention of the officers, which I have the honour of enclosing to your excellency for the inspection of congress, will, I flatter myself, be considered as the last glorious proof of patriotism which could have been given by men who aspired to the distinction of a patriot army; and will not only confirm their claim to the justice, but will increase their title to the gratitude of their country.

"The outcome of the grand convention of the officers, which I am honored to enclose for your excellency's review by Congress, will, I hope, be seen as the final outstanding demonstration of patriotism that could have been shown by those who aimed for the recognition of a patriotic army; and it will not only affirm their right to justice but also enhance their deserving gratitude from their country."

"Having seen the proceedings on the part of the army terminate with perfect unanimity, and in a manner entirely consonant to my wishes, being impressed with the liveliest sentiments of affection for those who have so long, so patiently, and so cheerfully, suffered and fought under my direction; having from motives of justice, duty, and gratitude, spontaneously offered myself as an advocate for their rights; and having been requested to write to your excellency, earnestly entreating the most speedy decision of congress upon the subjects of the late address from the army to that honourable body; it now only remains for me to perform the task I have assumed, and to intercede in their behalf, as I now do, that the sovereign power will be pleased to verify the predictions I have pronounced of, and the confidence the army have reposed in, the justice of their country.

"After seeing the army's proceedings come to a complete agreement and in a way that aligns perfectly with my wishes, I am filled with deep affection for those who have patiently and cheerfully endured and fought under my leadership for so long. Motivated by justice, duty, and gratitude, I have willingly offered to advocate for their rights. I have also been asked to write to you, respectfully urging a quick decision from Congress regarding the recent address from the army to that honorable body. Now, it’s time for me to fulfill this task I’ve taken on and to advocate for them, as I do now, that the governing authority will honor the promises I made and the trust the army has placed in the justice of our country."

"And here I humbly conceive it is altogether unnecessary (while I am pleading the cause of an army which have done and suffered more than any other army ever did in the defence of the rights and liberties of human nature) to expatiate on their claims to the most ample compensation for their meritorious services, because they are perfectly known to the whole world, and because (although the topics are inexhaustible) enough has already been said on the subject. To prove these assertions, to evince that my sentiments have ever been uniform, and to show what my ideas of the rewards in question have always been, I appeal to the archives of congress, and call on those sacred deposites to witness for me. And in order that my observations and arguments in favour of a future adequate provision for the officers of the army may be brought to remembrance again, and considered in a single point of view, without giving congress the trouble of having recourse to their files, I will beg leave to transmit herewith an extract from a representation made by me to a committee of congress, so long ago as the 20th of January, 1778, and also the transcript of a letter to the president of congress, dated near Passaic falls, October the 11th, 1780.

"And here I humbly believe it is completely unnecessary (while I am advocating for an army that has done and suffered more than any other army in the defense of human rights and freedoms) to elaborate on their claims for full compensation for their outstanding services, because they are well-known worldwide, and because (even though the topics are endless) enough has already been said about it. To support these statements, to show that my thoughts have always been consistent, and to clarify what my views on the rewards in question have always been, I refer to the archives of Congress and call upon those sacred records to testify on my behalf. And so that my observations and arguments for a future adequate provision for the officers of the army can be recalled and considered from a single perspective, without requiring Congress to search through their files, I would like to share an excerpt from a representation I made to a committee of Congress on January 20, 1778, as well as the transcript of a letter to the president of Congress, dated near Passaic Falls, October 11, 1780."

"That in the critical and perilous moment when the last mentioned communication was made, there was the utmost danger a dissolution of the army would have taken place unless measures similar to those recommended had been adopted, will not admit a doubt. That the adoption of the resolution granting half pay for life has been attended with all the happy consequences I foretold, so far as respected the good of the service, let the astonishing contrast between the state of the army at this instant and at the former period, determine. And that the establishment of funds, and security of the payment of all the just demands of the army, will be the most certain means of preserving the national faith, and future tranquillity of this extensive continent, is my decided opinion.

"There's no doubt that at the critical and dangerous moment when the last communication was made, the army would have dissolved if measures like those recommended hadn't been implemented. The resolution to grant half pay for life has led to all the positive outcomes I predicted for the good of the service; just look at the amazing difference between the army's current state and its earlier condition. I firmly believe that establishing funds and ensuring the payment of all the army's legitimate demands will be the most effective way to maintain national trust and future peace across this vast continent."

"By the preceding remarks, it will readily be imagined that, instead of retracting and reprehending (from farther experience and reflection) the mode of compensation so strenuously urged in the enclosures, I am more and more confirmed in the sentiment; and if in the wrong, suffer me to please myself in the grateful delusion. For if, besides the simple payment of their wages, a farther compensation is not due to the sufferings and sacrifices of the officers, then have I been mistaken indeed. If the whole army have not merited whatever a grateful people can bestow, then have I been beguiled by prejudice, and built opinion on the basis of error. If this country should not in the event perform every thing which has been requested in the late memorial to congress, then will my belief become vain, and the hope that has been excited void of foundation. 'And if (as has been suggested for the purpose of inflaming their passions) the officers of the army are to be the only sufferers by this revolution; if, retiring from the field, they are to grow old in poverty, wretchedness, and contempt; if they are to wade through the vile mire of dependency, and owe the miserable remnant of that life to charity which has hitherto been spent in honour,' then shall I have learned what ingratitude is; then shall I have realized a tale which will embitter every moment of my future life.

"From what I’ve just said, it's easy to see that instead of taking back and criticizing (based on further experience and reflection) the method of compensation strongly suggested in the enclosures, I am increasingly convinced of my position. If I’m wrong, then let me enjoy this grateful illusion. Because if, apart from simply paying their wages, no additional compensation is owed for the suffering and sacrifices of the officers, then I have truly been mistaken. If the entire army doesn’t deserve whatever a thankful nation can offer, then I have been misled by bias and built my views on a foundation of falsehood. If this country should fail to do everything requested in the recent memorial to Congress, then my beliefs will be in vain, and the hopes that have been raised will lack any real basis. 'And if (as has been suggested to stir their emotions) the officers of the army are to be the only ones to suffer from this revolution; if, stepping away from the battlefield, they are to grow old in poverty, misery, and scorn; if they are to wade through the filthy mire of dependency and owe what little remains of their lives to charity, which has until now been spent in honor,' then I will have learned what ingratitude truly is; I will have lived a story that will poison every moment of my future."

"But I am under no such apprehensions. A country rescued by their arms from impending ruin, will never leave unpaid the debt of gratitude.

"But I don't have any such concerns. A country saved by their efforts from certain destruction will never leave the debt of gratitude unpaid."

"Should any intemperate and improper warmth have mingled itself among the foregoing observations, I must entreat your excellency and congress that it may be attributed to the effusions of an honest zeal in the best of causes, and that my peculiar situation may be my apology; and I hope I need not, on this momentous occasion, make any new protestations of disinterestedness, having ever renounced for myself the idea of pecuniary reward. The consciousness of having attempted faithfully to discharge my duty, and the approbation of my country, will be a sufficient recompense for my services."

" if any excessive and inappropriate passion has mixed in with my earlier comments, I kindly ask your excellency and congress to see it as a result of my genuine enthusiasm for a noble cause, and I hope my unique circumstances serve as my excuse. I trust I don’t need to make any new declarations of impartiality on this significant occasion, as I have always dismissed the idea of financial gain for myself. The knowledge that I have tried my best to fulfill my duty and the approval of my country will be enough reward for my efforts."

March 24.
Peace concluded.

These proceedings of the army produced a concurrence of nine states in favour of a resolution commuting the half pay into a sum in gross equal to five years full pay; immediately after the passage of which, the fears still entertained in America that the war might continue, were dissipated by a letter from the Marquis de Lafayette, announcing a general peace. This intelligence, though not official, was certain; and orders were immediately issued, recalling all armed vessels cruising under the authority of the United States. April 19.Early in April, the copy of a declaration published in Paris, and signed by the American commissioners, announcing the exchange of ratifications of the preliminary articles between Great Britain and France, was received; and on the 19th of that month, the cessation[15] of hostilities was proclaimed.

These actions taken by the army led to support from nine states for a resolution to convert the half pay into a lump sum equivalent to five years of full pay. Right after this resolution was passed, the lingering fears in America that the war might continue were put to rest by a letter from the Marquis de Lafayette, which announced a general peace. Although this news wasn't official, it was credible; thus, orders were promptly issued to recall all armed vessels operating under the authority of the United States. April 19th. In early April, a copy of a declaration published in Paris and signed by the American commissioners, which announced the exchange of ratifications of the preliminary articles between Great Britain and France, was received. On the 19th of that month, the end[15] of hostilities was announced.

Measures for disbanding the army.

The attention of congress might now be safely turned to the reduction of the army. This, in the empty state of the treasury, was a critical operation. In addition to the anxieties which the officers would naturally feel respecting their provision for the future, which of necessity remained unsecured, large arrears of pay were due to them, the immediate receipt of part of which was required by the most urgent wants. To disband an army to which the government was greatly indebted, without furnishing the individuals who composed it with the means of conveyance to their respective homes, was a perilous measure; and congress was unable to advance the pay of a single month.

The attention of Congress could now safely shift to reducing the army. This was a critical task given the empty state of the treasury. Besides the concerns that the officers naturally had about their future security, which was uncertain, they were also owed a significant amount of back pay, with some of it needed immediately for their urgent needs. Disbanding an army that the government owed so much money to, without providing the soldiers the means to get home, was a risky move; and Congress couldn’t even advance a single month's pay.

Although eight millions had been required for the year 1782, the payments into the public treasury had amounted to only four hundred and twenty thousand and thirty-one dollars, and twenty-nine ninetieths; and the foreign loans had not been sufficient to defray expenses it was impossible to avoid, at the close of that year, the expenditures of the superintendent of the finances had exceeded his receipts four hundred and four thousand seven hundred and thirteen dollars and nine ninetieths; and the excess continued to increase rapidly.

Although eight million was needed for the year 1782, the deposits into the public treasury totaled only four hundred twenty thousand and thirty-one dollars and twenty-nine cents; the foreign loans were not enough to cover unavoidable expenses. By the end of that year, the expenditures of the superintendent of finances had surpassed his income by four hundred four thousand seven hundred thirteen dollars and nine cents, and the deficit kept growing quickly.

Congress urged the states to comply so far with the requisitions as to enable the superintendent of the finances to advance a part of the arrears due to the soldiers; but, as the foreign danger diminished, they became still less attentive to these demands; and the financier was under the necessity of making farther anticipations of the revenue. Measures were taken to advance three months pay in his notes; but, before they could be prepared, orders were issued for complying with a resolution of Congress for granting unlimited furloughs to the non-commissioned officers and privates who were engaged to serve during the war. These orders produced a serious alarm. The generals, and officers commanding regiments and corps cantoned on the Hudson, assembled, and presented an address to the Commander-in-chief, in which the most ardent affection to his person, and confidence in his attachment to the interests of the army, were mingled with expressions of profound duty and respect for the government. But they declared that, after the late explanation on their claims, they had confidently expected that their accounts would be liquidated, the balances ascertained, and adequate funds for the payment of those balances provided, before they should be dispersed or disbanded.

Congress urged the states to comply with the requisitions enough to allow the superintendent of finances to pay part of the back pay owed to the soldiers. However, as the foreign threat lessened, they became even less responsive to these demands, and the financier had to make further revenue projections. Plans were set to advance three months' pay through his notes; but before these could be arranged, orders were issued to follow a resolution from Congress that granted unlimited furloughs to the non-commissioned officers and privates who were committed to serving for the duration of the war. These orders caused a serious alarm. The generals and officers in charge of regiments and units stationed on the Hudson gathered and delivered a statement to the Commander-in-Chief, expressing their deep affection for him and confidence in his commitment to the army's interests, alongside their sincere respect for the government. However, they stated that after the recent clarification about their claims, they had expected that their accounts would be settled, the balances determined, and the necessary funds for those payments secured before they were sent home or disbanded.

Bound to the army by the strongest ties of affection and gratitude, intimately convinced of the justice of their claims, and of the patriotic principles by which they were influenced, the General was induced by sentiment not less than by prudence, to regard this application. He returned an answer, on the succeeding day, in which, after declaring "that as no man could possibly be better acquainted than himself with the past merits and services of the army, so no one could possibly be more strongly impressed with their present ineligible situation; feel a keener sensibility at their distresses; or more ardently desire to alleviate or remove them." He added, "although the officers of the army very well know my official situation, that I am only a servant of the public, and that it is not for me to dispense with orders which it is my duty to carry into execution, yet as furloughs in all services are considered as a matter of indulgence, and not of compulsion; as congress, I am persuaded, entertain the best disposition towards the army; and as I apprehend in a very short time, the two principal articles of complaint will be removed; until the farther pleasure of congress can be known, I shall not hesitate to comply with the wishes of the army, under these reservations only, that officers sufficient to conduct the men who choose to receive furloughs, will attend them, either on furlough or by detachment."

Bound to the army by strong feelings of love and gratitude, deeply convinced of the fairness of their demands and the patriotic principles behind them, the General was motivated by both sentiment and practicality to consider this request. He responded the following day, stating, "No one knows better than I do the past contributions and services of the army, and no one feels more strongly about their current difficult situation; I understand their struggles deeply and genuinely want to help ease their burdens." He went on to say, "While the officers of the army know my official role, that I am just a servant of the public, and that it's not my place to disregard orders that I am required to follow, I believe furloughs in all services are seen as a matter of generosity, not obligation. Since Congress, I am sure, has the best intentions for the army, and I expect that very soon the two main issues of concern will be resolved, until Congress communicates further instructions, I will gladly meet the army's wishes, with the only condition being that there are enough officers available to manage the soldiers who choose to take furloughs, whether on furlough or by detachment."

This answer satisfied the officers. The utmost good temper was manifested; and the arrangements for retiring on furlough were made without a murmur. In the course of the summer, a considerable proportion of the troops enlisted for three years were also permitted to return to their homes; and, in October, a proclamation was issued by congress, declaring all those who had engaged for the war to be discharged on the third of December.

This answer pleased the officers. Everyone was in a really good mood, and the plans for going on leave were made without any complaints. Over the summer, a significant number of the soldiers who had signed up for three years were also allowed to go back home; and in October, Congress announced that all those who had committed for the duration of the war would be discharged on December 3rd.

 

The Long Room in Fraunces' Tavern, New York City

The Long Room at Fraunces' Tavern, New York City

It was here that Washington took formal leave of his officers, preparatory to resigning his commission as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army. Controlling his emotion with difficulty, the General arose, at the conclusion of a light repast, and proposed the following health: "With a heart full of love and gratitude I must now take my leave of you. I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy as your former ones have been glorious and honorable." The toast was drunk in silence, and Washington added: "I cannot come to each of you to take my leave, but shall be obliged to you if each will come and take me by the hand."

It was here that Washington officially said goodbye to his officers, getting ready to step down as Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Army. Struggling to control his emotions, the General stood up after a simple meal and proposed a toast: "With a heart full of love and gratitude, I must now say goodbye. I sincerely hope that your future days are as successful and joyful as your past ones have been glorious and honorable." The toast was taken in silence, and Washington added: "I can't say goodbye to each of you individually, but I would appreciate it if you could all come up and shake my hand."

 

Mutiny of a part of the Pennsylvania line.

While these excellent dispositions were manifested by the veterans serving under the immediate eye of their patriot chief, the government was exposed to insult and outrage from the mutinous spirit of a small party of new levies. About eighty men of this description belonging to Pennsylvania, were stationed at Lancaster. Revolting against the authority of their officers, they marched in a body to Philadelphia, with the avowed purpose of obtaining redress of their grievances from the executive council of the state. The march of these insolent mutineers was not obstructed; and, after arriving in Philadelphia, their numbers were augmented by the junction of some troops quartered in the barracks. They then marched in military parade, with fixed bayonets, to the state-house, in which congress and the executive council of the state were sitting; and, after placing sentinels at the doors, sent in a written message, threatening the executive of the state with the vengeance of an enraged soldiery, if their demands were not gratified in twenty minutes. Although these threats were not directed particularly against congress, the government of the union was grossly insulted, and those who administered it were blockaded for several hours by licentious soldiers. After remaining in this situation about three hours, the members separated, having agreed to reassemble at Princeton.

While these commendable traits were displayed by the veterans serving under the watchful eye of their patriotic leader, the government faced disrespect and chaos from a rebellious group of new recruits. About eighty men from Pennsylvania were stationed in Lancaster. Defying their officers, they marched en masse to Philadelphia, intending to seek justice for their grievances from the state’s executive council. Their march was not stopped; and upon reaching Philadelphia, their numbers grew as they were joined by some troops housed in the barracks. They then paraded with fixed bayonets to the state house, where Congress and the state’s executive council were in session. After positioning sentinels at the doors, they sent a written message, threatening the state’s executive with the wrath of an angry army if their demands were not met within twenty minutes. Although these threats were not specifically aimed at Congress, the union government was severely insulted, and those who managed it were effectively trapped for several hours by unruly soldiers. After about three hours in this situation, the members left, having agreed to reconvene in Princeton.

On receiving information of this outrage, the Commander-in-chief detached fifteen hundred men under the command of Major General Howe, to suppress the mutiny. His indignation at this insult to the civil authority, and his mortification at this misconduct of any portion of the American troops, were strongly marked in his letter to the president of congress.

On hearing about this outrage, the Commander-in-chief sent fifteen hundred men led by Major General Howe to handle the mutiny. His anger at this insult to civil authority and his disappointment over the behavior of some American troops were clearly expressed in his letter to the president of Congress.

"While," said he, "I suffer the most poignant distress in observing that a handful of men, contemptible in numbers, and equally so in point of service, (if the veteran troops from the southward have not been seduced by their example,) and who are not worthy to be called soldiers, should disgrace themselves and their country as the Pennsylvania mutineers have done by insulting the sovereign authority of the United States, and that of their own, I feel an inexpressible satisfaction, that even this behaviour can not stain the name of the American soldiery. It can not be imputed to, or reflect dishonour on, the army at large; but, on the contrary, it will, by the striking contrast it exhibits, hold up to public view the other troops in the most advantageous point of light. Upon taking all the circumstances into consideration, I can not sufficiently express my surprise and indignation at the arrogance, the folly, and the wickedness of the mutineers; nor can I sufficiently admire the fidelity, the bravery, and patriotism, which must forever signalize the unsullied character of the other corps of our army. For when we consider that these Pennsylvania levies, who have now mutinied, are recruits, and soldiers of a day, who have not borne the heat and burden of the war, and who can have in reality very few hardships to complain of; and when we at the same time recollect that those soldiers, who have lately been furloughed from this army, are the veterans who have patiently endured hunger, nakedness, and cold; who have suffered and bled without a murmur, and who, with perfect good order, have retired to their homes, without a settlement of their accounts, or a farthing of money in their pockets; we shall be as much astonished at the virtues of the latter, as we are struck with horror and detestation at the proceedings of the former, and every candid mind, without indulging ill-grounded prejudices, will undoubtedly make the proper discrimination."

"While," he said, "I am deeply troubled to see that a small group of men, who are unimpressive in number and even less so in their service (if the veteran troops from the south haven't been led astray by their example) and who aren't worthy of being called soldiers, should disgrace both themselves and our country like the Pennsylvania mutineers by defying the authority of the United States and their own, I also feel an immense satisfaction that this behavior cannot tarnish the reputation of the American soldiers. It cannot be attributed to, or bring dishonor upon, the army as a whole; instead, the stark contrast will highlight the other troops in the best possible light. Considering all of this, I am both shocked and outraged by the arrogance, foolishness, and wickedness of the mutineers; and I greatly admire the loyalty, bravery, and patriotism that will always mark the unblemished character of the other units of our army. For when we remember that these Pennsylvania recruits, who have now mutinied, are new soldiers who haven’t faced the real struggles of war and have few legitimate hardships to complain about; and when we also recall that the soldiers who have recently been given leave from this army are veterans who have quietly endured hunger, cold, and suffering without complaint, and who have properly returned to their homes without settling their accounts or having any money; we will be just as astonished by the virtues of the latter as we are horrified by the actions of the former, and anyone with a fair mind, without misguided prejudices, will certainly make the right distinctions."

Before the detachment from the army could reach Philadelphia, the disturbances were, in a great degree, quieted without bloodshed; but General Howe was ordered by congress to continue his march into Pennsylvania, "in order that immediate measures might be taken to confine and bring to trial all such persons belonging to the army as have been principally active in the late mutiny; to disarm the remainder; and to examine fully into all the circumstances relating thereto."

Before the troops could arrive in Philadelphia, the unrest had largely calmed down without any violence; however, Congress ordered General Howe to keep moving into Pennsylvania, "so that immediate actions could be taken to identify and put on trial all army personnel who were mainly involved in the recent mutiny; to disarm the rest; and to thoroughly investigate all related circumstances."

The interval between the treaty with Great Britain and his retiring into private life, was devoted by the Commander-in-chief to objects of permanent utility.

The time between the treaty with Great Britain and his return to private life was spent by the Commander-in-chief on projects that would have lasting benefits.

The independence of his country being established, he looked forward with anxiety to its future destinies. These might greatly depend on the systems to be adopted on the return of peace, and to those systems much of his attention was directed. The future peace establishment of the United States was one of the many interesting subjects which claimed the consideration of congress. As the experience of General Washington would certainly enable him to suggest many useful ideas on this important point, his opinions respecting it were requested by the committee to whom it was referred. His letter on this occasion, which was deposited, it is presumed, in the archives of state, will long deserve the attention of those to whom the interests of the United States may be confided. His strongest hopes of securing the future tranquillity, dignity and respectability of his country were placed on a well regulated and well disciplined militia, and his sentiments on this subject are entitled to the more regard, as a long course of severe experience had enabled him to mark the total incompetency of the existing system to the great purposes of national defence.

Once his country's independence was secured, he felt anxious about its future. The direction it would take could significantly depend on the systems put in place when peace returned, and he focused much of his attention on those systems. The future peace framework for the United States was one of many important topics that Congress needed to consider. Given General Washington's experience, he was expected to offer valuable insights on this crucial issue, so the committee assigned to it sought his opinions. His letter on this matter, which is assumed to be stored in the state archives, will likely remain important for anyone entrusted with the interests of the United States. He had high hopes for ensuring the future peace, dignity, and respect of his country through a well-organized and well-trained militia. His views on this subject warrant significant consideration, as his extensive and tough experiences had shown him the total inadequacy of the existing system for national defense.

Evacuation of New York.

At length the British troops evacuated New York, and a detachment from the American army took possession of that town.

At last, the British troops left New York, and a group from the American army moved into the city.

Guards being posted for the security of the citizens, General Washington, accompanied by Governor Clinton, and attended by many civil and military officers, and a large number of respectable inhabitants on horseback, made his public entry into the city; where he was received with every mark of respect and attention. His military course was now on the point of terminating; and he was about to bid adieu to his comrades in arms. This affecting interview took place on the 4th of December. At noon, the principal officers of the army assembled at Frances' tavern, soon after which, their beloved commander entered the room. His emotions were too strong to be concealed. Filling a glass, he turned to them and said, "With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take leave of you; I most devoutly wish that your latter days may be as prosperous and happy, as your former ones have been glorious and honourable." Having drunk, he added, "I can not come to each of you to take my leave, but shall be obliged if each of you will come and take me by the hand." General Knox, being nearest, turned to him. Washington, incapable of utterance, grasped his hand, and embraced him. In the same affectionate manner he took leave of each succeeding officer. The tear of manly sensibility was in every eye; and not a word was articulated to interrupt the dignified silence, and the tenderness of the scene. Leaving the room, he passed through the corps of light infantry, and walked to White Hall, where a barge waited to convey him to Powles Hook. The whole company followed in mute and solemn procession, with dejected countenances, testifying feelings of delicious melancholy, which no language can describe. Having entered the barge, he turned to the company, and, waving his hat, bid them a silent adieu. They paid him the same affectionate compliment; and, after the barge had left them, returned in the same solemn manner to the place where they had assembled.[16]

Guards were stationed for the safety of the citizens as General Washington, along with Governor Clinton, was joined by numerous civil and military officers, along with a large group of distinguished locals on horseback, for his public entrance into the city. He received a warm welcome filled with respect and attention. His military journey was nearing its end, and he was about to say goodbye to his fellow soldiers. This emotional meeting happened on December 4th. At noon, the senior officers of the army gathered at Frances' Tavern, shortly after which their beloved commander walked into the room. His emotions were too strong to hide. Filling a glass, he turned to them and said, "With a heart full of love and gratitude, I now take my leave; I sincerely wish that your future days are as successful and happy as your past ones have been glorious and honorable." After taking a drink, he added, "I can't come to each of you individually to say goodbye, but I’d appreciate it if each of you would come up and shake my hand." General Knox, being the closest, turned to him. Washington, unable to speak, took his hand and embraced him. He bid farewell to each succeeding officer in the same affectionate way. Tears of heartfelt emotion were in everyone's eyes, and not a word was spoken to break the dignified silence and tenderness of the moment. As he left the room, he passed through the light infantry corps and walked to White Hall, where a barge was waiting to take him to Powles Hook. The entire group followed in quiet and somber procession, their faces showing feelings of bittersweet melancholy that no words could fully capture. Once he was in the barge, he turned to the group, waved his hat, and silently said goodbye. They returned the same affectionate gesture, and after the barge had left them, they walked back in the same solemn way to where they had gathered.[16]

Congress was then in session at Annapolis, in Maryland, to which place General Washington repaired, for the purpose of resigning into their hands the authority with which they had invested him.[17] He arrived on the 19th of December. The next day he informed that body of his intention to ask leave to resign the commission he had the honour of holding in their service; and requested to know whether it would be their pleasure that he should offer his resignation in writing, or at an audience.

Congress was in session at Annapolis, Maryland, where General Washington went to resign the authority they had given him. [17] He arrived on December 19th. The following day, he informed Congress of his intention to ask for permission to resign the commission he held in their service and asked whether they preferred that he submit his resignation in writing or in a meeting.

To give the more dignity to the act, they determined that it should be offered at a public audience on the following Tuesday, at twelve.

To give more dignity to the act, they decided it should be presented at a public audience on the following Tuesday at noon.

General Washington resigns his commission and retires to Mount Vernon.

When the hour arrived for performing a ceremony so well calculated to recall the various interesting scenes which had passed since the commission now to be returned was granted, the gallery was crowded with spectators, and several persons of distinction were admitted on the floor of congress. The members remained seated and covered. The spectators were standing, and uncovered. The general was introduced by the secretary, and conducted to a chair. After a short pause, the president[18] informed him that "The United States in congress assembled were prepared to receive his communications." With native dignity improved by the solemnity of the occasion, the general rose and delivered the following address.

When it was time for the ceremony designed to remind everyone of the various memorable moments that had happened since the commission was granted, the gallery was packed with onlookers, and several distinguished individuals were allowed onto the floor of Congress. The members stayed seated and covered, while the spectators stood and were uncovered. The secretary introduced the general and led him to a chair. After a brief pause, the president[18] informed him that "The United States in Congress assembled are ready to hear his message." With a sense of dignity heightened by the seriousness of the moment, the general stood up and delivered the following address.

"Mr. President,

"President,"

"The great events on which my resignation depended, having at length taken place, I have now the honour of offering my sincere congratulations to congress, and of presenting myself before them, to surrender into their hands the trust committed to me, and to claim the indulgence of retiring from the service of my country.

"The important events that influenced my decision to resign have finally occurred, and I now have the honor of expressing my genuine congratulations to Congress. I am here to hand over the trust placed in me and to request permission to step back from serving my country."

"Happy in the confirmation of our independence and sovereignty, and pleased with the opportunity afforded the United States of becoming a respectable nation, I resign with satisfaction the appointment I accepted with diffidence; a diffidence in my abilities to accomplish so arduous a task, which however was superseded by a confidence in the rectitude of our cause, the support of the supreme power of the union, and the patronage of heaven.

"Happy to confirm our independence and sovereignty, and pleased with the chance for the United States to become a respected nation, I resign with satisfaction the position I accepted with uncertainty; a uncertainty in my abilities to carry out such a difficult task, which was overcome by a belief in the rightness of our cause, the support of the highest authority of the union, and the favor of heaven."

"The successful termination of the war has verified the most sanguine expectations; and my gratitude for the interposition of Providence, and the assistance I have received from my countrymen, increases with every review of the momentous contest.

"The successful end of the war has confirmed even the most optimistic hopes; and my gratitude for the intervention of Providence, along with the support I've received from my fellow citizens, grows with every reflection on this significant struggle."

"While I repeat my obligations to the army in general, I should do injustice to my own feelings not to acknowledge in this place, the peculiar services and distinguished merits of the gentlemen who have been attached to my person during the war. It was impossible the choice of confidential officers to compose my family should have been more fortunate. Permit me, sir, to recommend in particular, those who have continued in the service to the present moment, as worthy of the favourable notice and patronage of congress.

"While I restate my duties to the army as a whole, I would be remiss if I didn't acknowledge here the special contributions and notable skills of the gentlemen who have served alongside me during the war. The selection of trusted officers to be part of my team could not have been better. Please allow me, sir, to specifically recommend those who have remained in service to this day, as deserving of the favorable attention and support of Congress."

"I consider it as an indispensable duty to close this last act of my official life, by commending the interests of our dearest country to the protection of Almighty God, and those who have the superintendence of them to his holy keeping.

"I see it as a vital responsibility to conclude this final chapter of my public life by committing the well-being of our beloved country to the care of Almighty God, and those in charge of its oversight to His sacred protection."

"Having now finished the work assigned me, I retire from the great theatre of action, and, bidding an affectionate farewell to this august body, under whose orders I have so long acted, I here offer my commission, and take my leave of all the employments of public life."

"Now that I’ve finished the work assigned to me, I step away from the grand stage of action and, saying a fond farewell to this esteemed group, under whose guidance I have served for so long, I submit my resignation and take my leave from all public duties."

After advancing to the chair and delivering his commission to the president, he returned to his place, and received standing the following answer of congress, which was delivered by the president.

After moving to the front and handing his commission to the president, he went back to his seat and received the following response from Congress, which was given by the president, while everyone stood.

"Sir,

"Sir,"

"The United States in congress assembled, receive with emotions too affecting for utterance, the solemn resignation of the authorities under which you have led their troops with success through a perilous and a doubtful war. Called upon by your country to defend its invaded rights, you accepted the sacred charge, before it had formed alliances, and whilst it was without funds or a government to support you. You have conducted the great military contest with wisdom and fortitude, invariably regarding the rights of the civil power, through all disasters and changes. You have by the love and confidence of your fellow citizens, enabled them to display their martial genius, and transmit their fame to posterity. You have persevered until these United States, aided by a magnanimous king and nation, have been enabled under a just Providence, to close the war in freedom, safety, and independence; on which happy event we sincerely join you in congratulations.

"The United States Congress, filled with deep emotions we can't fully express, acknowledges the solemn resignation of the leaders who successfully guided their troops through a dangerous and uncertain war. When called upon to defend the rights of the country against invasion, you accepted this critical responsibility before any alliances were formed and while lacking the necessary funds or government support. You managed the major military conflict with wisdom and strength, always respecting the rights of civil authority, even in the face of disasters and changes. Your leadership and the trust of your fellow citizens allowed them to showcase their military talents and secure their legacy for future generations. You have persevered until these United States, with the support of a generous king and nation, have been able, under just Providence, to conclude the war in freedom, safety, and independence; on this joyful occasion, we wholeheartedly congratulate you."

"Having defended the standard of liberty in this new world, having taught a lesson useful to those who inflict and to those who feel oppression, you retire from the great theatre of action with the blessings of your fellow citizens. But the glory of your virtues will not terminate with your military command; it will continue to animate remotest ages.

"After standing up for freedom in this new world and teaching a valuable lesson to those who impose and experience oppression, you step away from the grand stage of action with the support of your fellow citizens. But the glory of your virtues won’t end with your military service; it will continue to inspire future generations."

"We feel with you our obligations to the army in general, and will particularly charge ourselves with the interests of those confidential officers who have attended your person to this affecting moment.

"We share your sense of responsibility to the army as a whole, and we will specifically take on the concerns of the trusted officers who have accompanied you up to this difficult time."

"We join you in commending the interests of our dearest country to the protection of Almighty God, beseeching him to dispose the hearts and minds of its citizens, to improve the opportunity afforded them of becoming a happy and respectable nation. And for you, we address to him our earnest prayers that a life so beloved, may be fostered with all his care; that your days may be as happy as they have been illustrious; and that he will finally give you that reward which this world can not give."

"We join you in asking Almighty God to watch over our beloved country, urging Him to guide the hearts and minds of its citizens to make the most of the chance to become a happy and respected nation. And for you, we offer our heartfelt prayers that a life so cherished may be nurtured with all His care; that your days may be as joyful as they have been remarkable; and that He will eventually grant you the reward that this world cannot provide."

This scene being closed, a scene rendered peculiarly interesting by the personages who appeared in it, by the great events it recalled to the memory, and by the singularity of the circumstances under which it was displayed, the American chief withdrew from the hall of congress, leaving the silent and admiring spectators deeply impressed with those sentiments which its solemnity and dignity were calculated to inspire.

This scene concluded, which was particularly interesting because of the people involved, the major events it brought back to mind, and the unique circumstances surrounding it, the American chief left the congressional hall, leaving the quiet and admiring audience deeply moved by the feelings that its seriousness and dignity were meant to evoke.

Divested of his military character, General Washington retired to Mount Vernon, followed by the enthusiastic love, esteem, and admiration of his countrymen. Relieved from the agitations of a doubtful contest, and from the toils of an exalted station, he returned with increased delight to the duties and the enjoyments of a private citizen. He indulged the hope that, in the shade of retirement, under the protection of a free government, and the benignant influence of mild and equal laws, he might taste that felicity which is the reward of a mind at peace with itself, and conscious of its own purity.

Divested of his military role, General Washington retired to Mount Vernon, surrounded by the enthusiastic love, respect, and admiration of his fellow citizens. Free from the stress of a challenging conflict and the demands of a high position, he returned with greater joy to the responsibilities and pleasures of private life. He hoped that in the comfort of retirement, under the protection of a free government and the gentle influence of fair and equal laws, he could experience the happiness that comes from a mind at peace and aware of its own integrity.


CHAPTER III.

General Washington devotes his time to rural pursuits.... to the duties of friendship.... and to institutions of public utility.... Resolves of Congress and of the Legislature of Virginia for erecting statues to his honour.... Recommends improvement in inland navigation.... Declines accepting a donation made to him by his native state.... The society of the Cincinnati.... He is elected President.... The causes which led to a change of the government of the United States.... Circular letter of General Washington to the governors of the several states.

General Washington spends his time on farming... on friendships... and on public service initiatives... Congressional resolutions and the Virginia Legislature’s decisions to create statues in his honor... He suggests improvements for inland waterways... He refuses a donation from his home state... The Society of Cincinnati... He is elected President... The reasons for the changes in the U.S. government... Circular letter from General Washington to the governors of the states.

 

1783 to 1787
After retiring to private life, General Washington devotes his time to rural pursuits, to the duties of friendship, and to institutions of public utility.

When an individual, long in possession of great power, and almost unlimited influence, retires from office with alacrity, and resumes the character of a private citizen with pleasure, the mind is gratified in contemplating the example of virtuous moderation, and dwells upon it with approving satisfaction. We look at man in his most estimable character; and this view of him exalts our opinion of human nature. Such was the example exhibited by General Washington to his country and to the world. His deportment, and his language, equally attest that he returned with these feelings to the employments of private life. In a letter to Governor Clinton, written only three days after his arrival at Mount Vernon, he says, "The scene is at length closed. I feel myself eased of a load of public care, and hope to spend the remainder of my days in cultivating the affections of good men, and in the practice of the domestic virtues." "At length, my dear marquis," said he to his noble and highly valued friend, Lafayette, "I have become a private citizen on the banks of the Potomac; and under the shadow of my own vine, and my own fig tree, free from the bustle of a camp, and the busy scenes of public life, I am solacing myself with those tranquil enjoyments, of which the soldier who is ever in pursuit of fame—the statesman whose watchful days and sleepless nights are spent in devising schemes to promote the welfare of his own—perhaps the ruin of other countries, as if this globe was insufficient for us all—and the courtier who is always watching the countenance of his prince in the hope of catching a gracious smile—can have very little conception. I have not only retired from all public employments, but am retiring within myself, and shall be able to view the solitary walk, and tread the paths of private life, with heartfelt satisfaction. Envious of none, I am determined to be pleased with all; and this, my dear friend, being the order of my march, I will move gently down the stream of life, until I sleep with my fathers."

When a person who has held significant power and nearly unlimited influence steps down from their position eagerly and embraces the role of a private citizen with joy, it's a refreshing reminder of virtuous moderation that we admire and appreciate. We see people at their best, and this perspective lifts our view of human nature. Such was the example set by General Washington to his country and the world. His behavior and words clearly show that he returned to private life with these feelings. In a letter to Governor Clinton, written just three days after arriving at Mount Vernon, he states, "The scene is finally closed. I feel relieved of a burden of public duty and hope to spend the rest of my days cultivating the friendships of good people and practicing the virtues of home life." "At last, my dear marquis," he said to his esteemed friend, Lafayette, "I have become a private citizen by the Potomac River; and under my own vine and fig tree, free from the chaos of a camp and the hectic life of public service, I am enjoying those peaceful pleasures that a soldier chasing fame—the statesman who spends long days and sleepless nights crafting plans that may help himself, and perhaps ruin others, as if this world isn’t big enough for us all—and the courtier who constantly observes his prince, hoping for a kind smile—could hardly understand. I haven't just stepped away from public duties; I'm also turning inward, ready to reflect on the quiet life and walk the paths of private living with genuine contentment. Without envy for anyone, I’m set on finding joy in all things; and this, my dear friend, is my plan as I gently navigate through life until I finally rest with my ancestors."

But a mind accustomed to labour for a nation's welfare, does not immediately divest itself of ancient habits. That custom of thinking on public affairs, and that solicitude respecting them, which belong to the patriot in office, follow him into his retreat. In a letter to General Knox, written soon after his resignation, General Washington thus expressed the feelings attendant upon this sudden transition from public to private pursuits. "I am just beginning to experience the ease and freedom from public cares, which, however desirable, takes some time to realize; for strange as it may seem, it is nevertheless true, that it was not until lately, I could get the better of my usual custom of ruminating, as soon as I awoke in the morning, on the business of the ensuing day; and of my surprise at finding, after revolving many things in my mind, that I was no longer a public man, or had any thing to do with public transactions. I feel now, however, as I conceive a wearied traveller must do, who, after treading many a painful step with a heavy burden on his shoulders, is eased of the latter, having reached the haven to which all the former were directed; and from his house-top is looking back, and tracing with an eager eye, the meanders by which he escaped the quick-sands and mires which lay in his way, and into which none but the all powerful Guide and Dispenser of human events could have prevented his falling."

But a mind used to working for the good of the nation doesn’t instantly shake off old habits. That way of thinking about public issues and the concern for them, which belong to a patriot in office, follows him into his private life. In a letter to General Knox, written soon after he resigned, General Washington expressed how he felt about this sudden shift from public to private life: "I’m just starting to feel the relief and freedom from public worries, which, while desirable, takes some time to get used to; because strangely enough, it’s true that until recently, I couldn’t escape my usual habit of thinking about the day’s business as soon as I woke up. I was surprised to realize, after thinking through many things, that I was no longer a public figure or involved in public affairs. Now, however, I feel like a tired traveler who, after taking many painful steps carrying a heavy burden, is finally relieved of it upon arriving at a destination. From the rooftop of his house, he looks back, eagerly tracing the winding paths by which he escaped the quicksands and morasses in his way, into which only the all-powerful Guide and Dispenser of human events could have prevented him from falling."

For several months after arriving at Mount Vernon, almost every day brought him the addresses of an affectionate and grateful people. The glow of expression in which the high sense universally entertained of his services was conveyed, manifested the warmth of feeling which animated the American bosom. This unexampled tribute of voluntary applause, paid by a whole people, to an individual no longer in power, made no impression on the unassuming modesty of his character and deportment. The same firmness of mind, the same steady and well tempered judgment, which had guided him through the most perilous seasons of the war, still regulated his conduct; and the enthusiastic applauses of an admiring nation served only to cherish sentiments of gratitude, and to give greater activity to the desire still further to contribute to the general prosperity.

For several months after he arrived at Mount Vernon, almost every day he received messages from a loving and grateful people. The heartfelt way in which everyone expressed their appreciation for his services showed the strong feelings that filled the hearts of Americans. This unprecedented tribute of voluntary praise from an entire nation to someone no longer in power had no effect on his humble and modest character. The same strong mind and calm, balanced judgment that had guided him through the most dangerous times of the war continued to influence his actions; and the enthusiastic cheers from a nation in admiration only fueled his feelings of gratitude and increased his desire to contribute even more to the country’s prosperity.

Resolves of Congress and of the legislature of Virginia for erecting statues in honour of him.

It was not by addresses alone that his country manifested its attachment to him. Soon after peace was proclaimed, congress unanimously passed a resolution for the erection of an equestrian statue of their general,[19] at the place which should be established for the residence of the government.

It wasn't just through speeches that his country showed its affection for him. Shortly after peace was declared, Congress unanimously passed a resolution to build an equestrian statue of their general,[19] at the site designated for the government’s residence.

The legislature of Virginia too, at its first session after his resignation, passed the following resolution.[20]

The Virginia legislature, during its first session after his resignation, passed the following resolution.[20]

"Resolved, that the executive be requested to take measures for procuring a statue of General Washington, to be of the finest marble and best workmanship, with the following inscription on its pedestal:

"Resolved, that the executive be asked to take steps to obtain a statue of General Washington, made of the finest marble and highest quality craftsmanship, with the following inscription on its pedestal:"

"The general assembly of the commonwealth of Virginia have caused this statue to be erected as a monument of affection and gratitude to GEORGE WASHINGTON, who, uniting to the endowments of the hero, the virtues of the patriot, and exerting both in establishing the liberties of his country, has rendered his name dear to his fellow citizens, and given the world an immortal example of true glory."

"The general assembly of the commonwealth of Virginia has caused this statue to be erected as a monument of love and appreciation for GEORGE WASHINGTON, who, combining the qualities of a hero with the virtues of a patriot, and using both to secure the freedoms of his country, has made his name beloved by his fellow citizens and provided the world with a lasting example of true glory."

Although the toils of General Washington were no longer exhibited to the public eye, his time continued to be usefully employed. The judicious cultivation of the earth is justly placed among the most valuable sources of national prosperity, and nothing could be more wretched than the general state of agriculture in America. To its melioration by examples which might be followed, and by the introduction of systems adapted to the soil, the climate, and to the situation of the people, the energies of his active and intelligent mind were now in a great degree directed. No improvement of the implements to be used on a farm, no valuable experiments in husbandry, escaped his attention. His inquiries, which were equally minute and comprehensive, extended beyond the limits of his own country; and he entered into a correspondence on this interesting subject with those foreigners who had been most distinguished for their additions to the stock of agricultural science.

Although General Washington’s efforts were no longer on public display, he continued to spend his time productively. The careful cultivation of land is rightly considered one of the most important sources of national wealth, and the overall state of agriculture in America was quite poor. He focused much of his energy on improving it through examples others could follow and by introducing farming methods suited to the land, climate, and needs of the people. He paid attention to every possible improvement in farming tools and valuable agricultural experiments. His inquiries were thorough and wide-ranging, reaching beyond the borders of his own country; he engaged in correspondence on this important topic with noted experts from abroad who made significant contributions to agricultural science.

 

The Old Senate Chamber at Annapolis, Maryland, Where Washington Resigned His Commission

The Old Senate Chamber in Annapolis, Maryland, Where Washington Gave Up His Commission

The fate of the Republic was in the hands of Washington when he resigned his commission to Congress, then sitting at Annapolis, December 23, 1783, and retired to private life. Had he so desired, it is probable that he could have founded a monarchy, sustained by his army. Instead, as he wrote to Lafayette, shortly after his return to Mount Vernon: "I have not only retired from all public employments but am retiring within myself, and shall be able to view the solitary walk, and tread the paths of private life, with heartfelt satisfaction. Envious of none, I am determined to be pleased with all; and this, my dear friend, being the order of my march, I will move gently down the stream of life, until I sleep with my fathers."

The future of the Republic rested with Washington when he resigned his commission to Congress, which was meeting in Annapolis, on December 23, 1783, and went back to private life. If he had wanted to, he likely could have established a monarchy, backed by his army. Instead, as he wrote to Lafayette shortly after getting back to Mount Vernon: "I've not only stepped away from all public roles but am also turning inward, and I’ll be able to embrace solitude and follow the paths of private life with genuine satisfaction. I'm jealous of no one, and I’m committed to being content with everyone; and this, my dear friend, being the way I intend to go, I will glide gently along the stream of life until I rest with my ancestors."

 

Mingled with this favourite pursuit, were the multiplied avocations resulting from the high office he had lately filled. He was engaged in an extensive correspondence with the friends most dear to his heart—the foreign and American officers who had served under him during the late war—and with almost every conspicuous political personage of his own, and with many of other countries. Literary men also were desirous of obtaining his approbation of their works, and his attention was solicited to every production of American genius. His countrymen who were about to travel, were anxious to receive from the first citizen of this rising republic, some testimonial of their worth; and all those strangers of distinction who visited this newly created empire, were ambitious of being presented to its founder. Among those who were drawn across the Atlantic by curiosity, and perhaps by a desire to observe the progress of the popular governments which were instituted in this new world, was Mrs. Macauley Graham. By the principles contained in her History of the Stuarts, this lady had acquired much reputation in republican America, and by all was received with marked attention. For the sole purpose of paying her respects to a person whose fame had spread over Europe, she paid a visit to Mount Vernon; and, if her letters may be credited, the exalted opinion she had formed of its proprietor, was "not diminished by a personal acquaintance with him."

Mixed in with this favorite hobby were the various responsibilities that came with the important position he had recently held. He was engaged in extensive correspondence with the friends he held closest—the foreign and American officers who served under him during the recent war—and with almost every notable political figure from his country and many from others. Writers were also eager to get his approval for their works, and his attention was sought for every expression of American talent. His fellow countrymen who were about to travel were keen to receive a letter of recommendation from the leading citizen of this emerging republic; and all distinguished visitors to this newly established empire were eager to be introduced to its founder. Among those drawn across the Atlantic by curiosity, and perhaps by a desire to witness the growth of popular governments in this new world, was Mrs. Macauley Graham. By the principles laid out in her History of the Stuarts, this woman gained much recognition in republican America and was warmly welcomed by all. With the sole purpose of paying her respects to someone whose fame had spread throughout Europe, she visited Mount Vernon; and if her letters can be believed, the high regard she had for its owner was "not diminished by a personal acquaintance with him."

To these occupations, which were calculated to gratify an intelligent mind, or which derived a value from the indulgence they afforded to the feelings of the heart, others were unavoidably added, in the composition of which, no palatable ingredient was intermixed. Of these unwelcome intrusions upon his time, General Washington thus complained to an intimate military friend. "It is not, my dear sir, the letters of my friends which give me trouble, or add aught to my perplexity. I receive them with pleasure, and pay as much attention to them as my avocations will permit. It is references to old matters with which I have nothing to do—applications which oftentimes can not be complied with—inquiries, to satisfy which would employ the pen of a historian—letters of compliment, as unmeaning perhaps as they are troublesome, but which must be attended to; and the common-place business—which employ my pen and my time often disagreeably. Indeed, these, with company, deprive me of exercise; and, unless I can obtain relief, must be productive of disagreeable consequences. Already I begin to feel their effects. Heavy and painful oppressions of the head, and other disagreeable sensations often trouble me. I am determined therefore to employ some person who shall ease me of the drudgery of this business. At any rate, if the whole of it is thereby suspended, I am determined to use exercise. My private affairs also require infinitely more attention than I have given, or can give them, under present circumstances. They can no longer be neglected without involving my ruin."

To these activities, which were meant to satisfy an intelligent mind or that gained value from the emotional satisfaction they provided, other tasks were inevitably added, none of which held any enjoyable aspects. General Washington expressed his frustration about these unwelcome interruptions to his time to a close military friend. "It’s not, my dear sir, the letters from my friends that trouble me or add to my confusion. I welcome them and give them as much attention as my responsibilities allow. It’s the references to past issues that I have nothing to do with—requests that often cannot be fulfilled—questions that would require the work of a historian to answer—letters of praise that may be as meaningless as they are bothersome, but which I have to address; and the routine tasks—which often take up my time and energy in an unpleasant way. In fact, these, along with visitors, prevent me from getting exercise; and unless I can find some relief, they will lead to unpleasant outcomes. I’m already starting to feel their impact. I have heavy and painful pressure in my head, and other uncomfortable sensations often trouble me. So, I’ve decided to hire someone to take care of the drudgery of these tasks. In any case, if that means putting everything on hold, I’m determined to find time for exercise. My personal matters also need way more attention than I’ve given or can give them under the current circumstances. They can’t be ignored any longer without risking my downfall."

It was some time after the date of this letter before he could introduce into his family a young gentleman, whose education and manners enabled him to fill the station of a private secretary and of a friend.

It was a while after this letter was written before he could bring into his family a young man, whose education and manners allowed him to serve as both a private secretary and a friend.

This multiplicity of private avocations could not entirely withdraw the mind of Washington from objects tending to promote and secure the public happiness. His resolution never again to appear in the busy scenes of political life, though believed by himself, and by his bosom friends, to be unalterable, could not render him indifferent to those measures on which the prosperity of his country essentially depended.

This variety of personal interests couldn’t completely keep Washington’s mind away from things that would promote and ensure the public good. His decision to never return to the hectic world of politics, although he and his close friends thought it was final, didn’t make him indifferent to the actions crucial for his country’s prosperity.

To a person looking beyond the present moment, it was only necessary to glance over the map of the United States, to be impressed with the importance of connecting the western with the eastern territory, by facilitating the means of intercourse between them. To this subject, the attention of General Washington had been directed in the early part of his life. While the American states were yet British colonies, he had obtained the passage of a bill for opening the Potomac so as to render it navigable from tide water to Wills creek.[21] The river James had also been comprehended in this plan; and he had triumphed so far over the opposition produced by local interests and prejudices, that the business was in a train which promised success, when the revolutionary war diverted the attention of its patrons, and of all America, from internal improvements to the still greater objects of liberty and independence. As that war approached its termination, subjects which for a time had yielded their pretensions to consideration, reclaimed that place to which their real magnitude entitled them; and internal navigation again attracted the attention of the wise and thinking part of society. Accustomed to contemplate America as his country, and to consider with solicitude the interests of the whole, Washington now took a more enlarged view of the advantages to be derived from opening both the eastern and the western waters; and for this, as well as for other purposes, after peace had been proclaimed, he traversed the western parts of New England and New York. "I have lately," said he in a letter to the Marquis of Chastellux, a nobleman in pursuit of literary as well as of military fame, "made a tour through the lakes George and Champlain as far as Crown Point;—then returning to Schenectady, I proceeded up the Mohawk river to fort Schuyler, crossed over to Wood creek which empties into the Oneida lake, and affords the water communication with Ontario. I then traversed the country to the head of the eastern branch of the Susquehanna, and viewed the lake Otswego, and the portage between that lake and the Mohawk river at Cotnajohario. Prompted by these actual observations, I could not help taking a more contemplative and extensive view of the vast inland navigation of these United States, and could not but be struck with the immense diffusion and importance of it; and with the goodness of that Providence which has dealt his favours to us with so profuse a hand. Would to God we may have wisdom enough to improve them. I shall not rest contented until I have explored the western country, and traversed those lines (or great part of them) which have given bounds to a new empire."

To someone looking beyond the present, it only took a quick look at the map of the United States to see the importance of linking the western and eastern territories by improving communication between them. General Washington had focused on this issue early in his life. When the American states were still British colonies, he managed to get a bill passed to make the Potomac navigable from tidewater to Wills Creek.[21] The James River was also included in this plan, and he had overcome local interests and biases enough that progress was being made when the Revolutionary War shifted everyone's focus from internal improvements to the more pressing goals of liberty and independence. As the war came to an end, issues that had temporarily been set aside regained their importance, and internal navigation once again drew the attention of the thoughtful members of society. Considering America as his own country and being concerned about the greater good, Washington began to see the broader benefits of opening both eastern and western waterways. For this reason, as well as for other objectives, after peace was declared, he traveled through the western parts of New England and New York. "I have recently," he wrote in a letter to the Marquis of Chastellux, a nobleman who sought both literary and military fame, "taken a trip through Lakes George and Champlain as far as Crown Point; then returning to Schenectady, I traveled up the Mohawk River to Fort Schuyler, crossed over to Wood Creek which flows into Oneida Lake and provides water access to Ontario. I then explored the area to the head of the eastern branch of the Susquehanna, and checked out Lake Otswego, as well as the portage between that lake and the Mohawk River at Cotnajohario. Encouraged by these firsthand observations, I felt compelled to take a broader and deeper look at the vast internal navigation of these United States, and I was impressed by its extensive importance and the generous support of Providence that has favored us so abundantly. I pray we have enough wisdom to make the most of it. I won’t be satisfied until I have explored the western country and traveled along those lines (or most of them) that define a new empire."

Scarcely had he answered those spontaneous offerings of the heart, which flowed in upon him from every part of a grateful nation, when his views were once more seriously turned to this truly interesting subject. Its magnitude was also impressed on others; and the value of obtaining the aid which his influence and active interference would afford to any exertions for giving this direction to the public mind, and for securing the happy execution of the plan which might be devised, was perceived by all those who attached to the great work its real importance. A gentleman[22] who had taken an expanded view of it, concluded a letter to General Washington, containing a detailed statement of his ideas on the subject in these terms:

Scarcely had he replied to those heartfelt expressions of gratitude coming from every corner of the nation when his attention was once again drawn to this genuinely fascinating topic. The significance of it also registered with others; and everyone who recognized the real importance of this grand endeavor understood the value of getting help from his influence and active involvement to shape public opinion and ensure the successful execution of the proposed plan. A gentleman[22] who had taken a broader perspective on it ended a letter to General Washington, detailing his thoughts on the subject with these words:

"But a most powerful objection always arises to propositions of this kind. It is, that public undertakings are carelessly managed, and much money spent to little purpose. To obviate this objection is the purpose of my giving you the trouble of this discussion. You have retired from public life. You have weighed this determination, and it would be impertinence in me to touch it. But would the superintendence of this work break in too much on the sweets of retirement and repose? If they would, I stop here. Your future time and wishes are sacred in my eye. If it would be only a dignified amusement to you, what a monument of your retirement would it be! It is one which would follow that of your public life, and bespeak it the work of the same great hand. I am confident, that would you either alone, or jointly with any persons you think proper, be willing to direct this business, it would remove the only objection, the weight of which I apprehend."

"But a very strong objection always comes up to proposals like this. It's that public projects are often mismanaged, and a lot of money is wasted with little benefit. The purpose of this discussion is to address that concern. You've stepped back from public life. You've thought this decision through, and it would be rude of me to question it. But would overseeing this project interfere too much with your enjoyment of retirement and peace? If it would, I’ll stop here. Your future time and desires are important to me. If it would just be a worthy pastime for you, what a lasting tribute to your retirement it would be! It would complement your public life and reflect the work of the same great mind. I'm sure that if you, whether alone or with others you trust, would be willing to take on this task, it would solve the only issue I’m worried about."

Recommends the opening and improving the inland navigation of the great rivers in Virginia.

In the autumn of 1784, General Washington made a tour as far west as Pittsburgh; after returning from which, his first moments of leisure were devoted to the task of engaging his countrymen in a work which appeared to him to merit still more attention from its political, than from its commercial influence on the union. In a long and interesting letter to Mr. Harrison, then governor of Virginia, he detailed the advantages which might be derived from opening the great rivers, the Potomac and the James, as high as should be practicable. After stating with his accustomed exactness the distances, and the difficulties to be surmounted in bringing the trade of the west to different points on the Atlantic, he expressed unequivocally the opinion, that the rivers of Virginia afforded a more convenient, and a more direct course than could be found elsewhere, for that rich and increasing commerce. This was strongly urged as a motive for immediately commencing the work. But the rivers of the Atlantic constituted only a part of the great plan he contemplated. He suggested the appointment of commissioners of integrity and abilities, exempt from the suspicion of prejudice, whose duty it should be, after an accurate examination of the James and the Potomac, to search out the nearest and best portages between those waters and the streams capable of improvement, which run into the Ohio. Those streams were to be accurately surveyed, the impediments to their navigation ascertained, and their relative advantages examined. The navigable waters west of the Ohio, towards the great lakes, were also to be traced to their sources, and those which empty into the lakes to be followed to their mouths. "These things being done, and an accurate map of the whole presented to the public, he was persuaded that reason would dictate what was right and proper." For the execution of this latter part of his plan he had also much reliance on congress; and in addition to the general advantages to be drawn from the measure, he laboured, in his letters to the members of that body, to establish the opinion, that the surveys he recommended would add to the revenue, by enhancing the value of the lands offered for sale. "Nature," he said, "had made such an ample display of her bounties in those regions, that the more the country was explored, the more it would rise in estimation."

In the fall of 1784, General Washington took a trip as far west as Pittsburgh. After returning, he spent his free time trying to get his fellow citizens involved in a project he believed deserved more attention due to its political influence than its economic one for the union. In a long and engaging letter to Mr. Harrison, then the governor of Virginia, he outlined the benefits of opening the major rivers, the Potomac and the James, as far up as possible. He clearly stated the distances and the challenges to be overcome in moving western trade to various points on the Atlantic, and he firmly believed that Virginia's rivers offered a more convenient and direct route than any other for that growing commerce. He strongly urged starting this work immediately. However, the Atlantic rivers were just one part of his broader vision. He proposed appointing trustworthy and capable commissioners, free from bias, to thoroughly examine the James and the Potomac, and to identify the nearest and best portages between those rivers and the improved streams flowing into the Ohio. These streams were to be surveyed in detail, their navigation obstacles identified, and their relative advantages assessed. The navigable waters west of the Ohio, heading towards the Great Lakes, should also be traced back to their sources, and those that flow into the lakes should be followed to their outlets. "Once these things are done, and an accurate map of everything is made public, I'm convinced that reason will guide what is right and necessary." For carrying out this final part of his plan, he also relied heavily on Congress. Besides the overall benefits from the initiative, he worked to convince the members of that body through his letters that the surveys he suggested would boost revenue by increasing the value of the lands for sale. "Nature," he stated, "has showcased her wealth in those areas so abundantly that the more the country is explored, the more its worth will grow."

The assent and co-operation of Maryland being indispensable to the improvement of the Potomac, he was equally earnest in his endeavours to impress a conviction of its superior advantages on those individuals who possessed most influence in that state. In doing so, he detailed the measures which would unquestionably be adopted by New York and Pennsylvania, for acquiring the monopoly of the western commerce, and the difficulty which would be found in diverting it from the channel it had once taken. "I am not," he added, "for discouraging the exertions of any state to draw the commerce of the western country to its sea-ports. The more communications we open to it, the closer we bind that rising world (for indeed it may be so called) to our interests, and the greater strength shall we acquire by it. Those to whom nature affords the best communication, will, if they are wise, enjoy the greatest share of the trade. All I would be understood to mean, therefore, is, that the gifts of Providence may not be neglected."

The support and cooperation of Maryland were essential for improving the Potomac, so he worked hard to convince the influential people in that state of its significant benefits. He explained the plans that New York and Pennsylvania would definitely pursue to gain control over western trade and the challenges that would arise in redirecting it from its established path. "I’m not," he added, "against any state trying to attract the trade of the western region to its ports. The more routes we create, the more we tie that emerging world (and it truly is one) to our interests, which will only strengthen us. Those who have the best access will, if they are smart, benefit the most from the trade. What I want to emphasize is that we shouldn’t overlook the opportunities presented to us by Providence."

But the light in which this subject would be viewed with most interest, and which gave to it most importance, was its political influence on the union. "I need not remark to you, sir," said he in his letter to the governor of Virginia, "that the flanks and rear of the United States are possessed by other powers,—and formidable ones too: need I press the necessity of applying the cement of interest to bind all parts of the union together by indissoluble bonds,—especially of binding that part of it which lies immediately west of us, to the middle states. For what ties, let me ask, should we have upon those people, how entirely unconnected with them shall we be, and what troubles may we not apprehend, if the Spaniards on their right, and Great Britain on their left, instead of throwing impediments in their way as they now do, should hold out lures for their trade and alliance? when they get strength, which will be sooner than most people conceive, what will be the consequence of their having formed close commercial connexions with both, or either of those powers? it needs not, in my opinion, the gift of prophecy to foretell."

But the light in which this topic would be viewed with the most interest, and which gave it the most importance, was its political impact on the union. "I don’t need to remind you, sir," he wrote in his letter to the governor of Virginia, "that the flanks and rear of the United States are held by other powers—and strong ones at that: do I need to stress the importance of applying the bonds of mutual interest to connect all parts of the union together with unbreakable ties—especially binding that part which lies directly west of us to the middle states? What connections, let me ask, will we have with those people? How completely disconnected will we be from them? And what troubles might we not expect if the Spaniards on their right and Great Britain on their left, instead of putting obstacles in their path as they currently do, should offer incentives for their trade and alliances? When they gain strength, which will happen sooner than most people think, what will be the outcome of their having established close commercial relationships with either or both of those powers? In my opinion, it doesn’t require a prophetic gift to predict."

This idea was enlarged and pressed with much earnestness, in his letters to several members of congress.

This idea was expanded upon and emphasized with great seriousness in his letters to various members of Congress.

The letter to the governor was communicated to the assembly of Virginia, and the internal improvements it recommended were zealously supported by the wisest members of that body. While the subject remained undecided, General Washington, accompanied by the Marquis de Lafayette, who had crossed the Atlantic, and had devoted a part of his time to the delights of an enthusiastic friendship, paid a visit to the capital of the state. Never was reception more cordial, or more demonstrative of respect and affection, than was given to these beloved personages. But amidst the display of addresses and of entertainments which were produced by the occasion, the great business of internal improvements was not forgotten; and the ardour of the moment was seized to conquer those objections to the plan, which yet lingered in the bosoms of members who could perceive in it no future advantages to compensate for the present expense.

The letter to the governor was shared with the Virginia assembly, and the internal improvements it suggested were eagerly backed by the smartest members of that group. While the topic was still up in the air, General Washington visited the state's capital, along with the Marquis de Lafayette, who had crossed the Atlantic and spent some of his time enjoying their deep friendship. They received a warm welcome that showed immense respect and affection for these admired figures. However, amidst the speeches and celebrations held for the occasion, the important issue of internal improvements wasn't overlooked; and the enthusiasm of the moment was used to address the hesitations of those members who couldn't see any future benefits that would outweigh the current costs.

An exact conformity between the acts of Virginia and of Maryland, being indispensable to the improvement of the Potomac, the friends of the measure deemed it adviseable to avail themselves of the same influence with the latter state, which had been successfully employed with the former; and a resolution was passed, soon after the return of General Washington to Mount Vernon, requesting him[23] to attend the legislature of Maryland, in order to agree on a bill which might receive the sanction of both states. This agreement being happily completed, the bills were enacted which form the first essay towards connecting the navigation of the eastern with the western waters of the United States.

An exact alignment between the actions of Virginia and Maryland was essential for improving the Potomac River. Supporters of the initiative thought it would be wise to use the same influence with Maryland that had been successfully applied with Virginia. A resolution was passed shortly after General Washington returned to Mount Vernon, asking him[23] to attend the Maryland legislature to work on a bill that could be approved by both states. Once this agreement was successfully reached, the bills were enacted, marking the first attempt to connect the navigation between the eastern and western waters of the United States.

These acts were succeeded by one, which conveys the liberal wishes of the legislature, with a delicacy scarcely less honourable to its framers, than to him who was its object. The treasurer had been instructed to subscribe, in behalf of the state, for a specified number of shares in each company. Just at the close of the session, when no refusal of their offer could be communicated to them, a bill was suddenly brought in, which received the unanimous assent of both houses, authorizing the treasurer to subscribe for the benefit of General Washington, the same number of shares in each company as were to be taken for the state. A preamble was prefixed to the enacting clause of this bill[24] in which its greatest value consisted. With simple elegance, it conveyed the sentiment, that in seizing this occasion, to make a donation which would in some degree testify their sense of the merits of their most favoured and most illustrious citizen, the donors would themselves be the obliged.

These actions were followed by another that reflects the generous intentions of the legislature, showcasing a respect that is just as commendable for its creators as it is for the individual it was meant to honor. The treasurer had been directed to purchase, on behalf of the state, a certain number of shares in each company. Right at the end of the session, when they couldn't refuse their offer, a bill was introduced that received unanimous approval from both houses, allowing the treasurer to buy the same number of shares in each company for General Washington as were to be purchased for the state. A preamble was added to the main part of this bill[24] which held its greatest significance. With straightforward elegance, it expressed the idea that by seizing this opportunity to make a donation that would somewhat acknowledge the merits of their most favored and esteemed citizen, the donors would find themselves benefited as well.

However delightful might be the sensations produced by this delicate and flattering testimony of the affection of his fellow citizens, it was not without its embarrassments. From his early resolution to receive no pecuniary compensation for his services, he could not permit himself to depart; and yet this mark of the gratitude and attachment of his country, could not easily be rejected without furnishing occasion for sentiments he was unwilling to excite. To the friend[25] who conveyed to him the first intelligence of this bill, his difficulties were thus expressed.

However enjoyable the feelings stirred by this kind and flattering recognition from his fellow citizens, it came with its own challenges. Given his early decision to accept no financial reward for his services, he couldn't allow himself to back down; yet, this symbol of his country's gratitude and love was hard to decline without provoking feelings he didn't want to stir up. He shared his struggles with the friend[25] who first informed him about this bill.

He declines accepting a donation made to him by his native state.

"It is not easy for me to decide by which my mind was most affected upon the receipt of your letter of the sixth instant—surprise or gratitude. Both were greater than I had words to express. The attention and good wishes which the assembly has evidenced by their act for vesting in me one hundred and fifty shares in the navigation of the rivers Potomac and James, is more than mere compliment,—there is an unequivocal and substantial meaning annexed. But, believe me, sir, no circumstance has happened since I left the walks of public life which has so much embarrassed me. On the one hand, I consider this act, as I have already observed, as a noble and unequivocal proof of the good opinion, the affection, and disposition of my country to serve me; and I should be hurt, if by declining the acceptance of it, my refusal should be construed into disrespect, or the smallest slight upon the generous intention of the legislature; or that an ostentatious display of disinterestedness, or public virtue, was the source of refusal.

"It's not easy for me to decide whether I was more surprised or grateful when I received your letter on the sixth. Both feelings were stronger than I can express. The attention and good wishes shown by the assembly through their decision to grant me one hundred and fifty shares in the navigation of the Potomac and James rivers is more than just a compliment—it holds clear and significant meaning. But, believe me, no situation has arisen since I stepped away from public life that has confused me as much. On one hand, I see this act, as I've mentioned, as a noble and clear sign of my country’s good opinion, affection, and willingness to support me; and I would feel hurt if my choice not to accept it were interpreted as disrespect or any kind of slight to the generous intentions of the legislature, or if it were seen as a show of selflessness or public virtue that led to my refusal."

"On the other hand, it is really my wish to have my mind and my actions, which are the result of reflection, as free and independent as the air, that I may be more at liberty (in things which my opportunities and experience have brought me to the knowledge of) to express my sentiments, and if necessary, to suggest what may occur to me, under the fullest conviction that, although my judgment may be arraigned, there will be no suspicion that sinister motives had the smallest influence in the suggestion. Not content then with the bare consciousness of my having in all this navigation business, acted upon the clearest conviction of the political importance of the measure, I would wish that every individual who may hear that it was a favourite plan of mine, may know also, that I had no other motive for promoting it, than the advantage of which I conceived it would be productive to the union at large, and to this state in particular, by cementing the eastern and western territory together, at the same time that it will give vigour and increase to our commerce, and be a convenience to our citizens."

On the other hand, I really want my thoughts and actions, which come from reflection, to be as free and independent as the air, so I can express my feelings more freely (in matters that my experiences and knowledge have brought to me) and, if necessary, suggest what comes to mind, fully convinced that even if my judgment is questioned, there won’t be any doubt about my intentions. I’m not satisfied just knowing that in all this navigation business, I acted on a clear belief in the political importance of the measure. I want everyone who hears that it was one of my favorite plans to also understand that my only motivation for supporting it was the benefit it would bring to the overall union and to our state in particular by connecting the eastern and western territories while also boosting our commerce and serving our citizens better.

At length he determined, in the same letter which should convey his resolution not to retain the shares for his private emolument, to signify his willingness to hold them in trust for such public institution as the legislature should approve. The following letter conveyed this resolution to the general assembly, through the governor of the state.

At last, he decided, in the same letter that communicated his choice not to keep the shares for his personal benefit, to express his readiness to hold them in trust for any public institution that the legislature would support. The next letter communicated this decision to the general assembly, through the governor of the state.

(October, 1785.)

(October 1785)

"Sir,

"Hey,"

"Your excellency having been pleased to transmit me a copy of the act appropriating to my benefit certain shares in the companies for opening the navigation of James and Potomac rivers, I take the liberty of returning to the general assembly through your hands, the profound and grateful acknowledgments inspired by so signal a mark of their beneficent intentions towards me. I beg you, sir, to assure them, that I am filled on this occasion with every sentiment which can flow from a heart warm with love for my country, sensible to every token of its approbation and affection, and solicitous to testify in every instance a respectful submission to its wishes.

"Your excellency, I appreciate you sending me a copy of the act that allocates certain shares in the companies for opening the navigation of the James and Potomac rivers for my benefit. I want to take this opportunity to express my deep and heartfelt thanks to the general assembly through you for such a significant gesture of their goodwill towards me. Please assure them that I am truly filled with all the emotions that come from a heart that loves my country, is grateful for every sign of its approval and kindness, and is eager to show my respectful adherence to its wishes."

"With these sentiments in my bosom, I need not dwell on the anxiety I feel in being obliged, in this instance, to decline a favour which is rendered no less flattering by the manner in which it is conveyed, than it is affectionate in itself. In explaining this, I pass over a comparison of my endeavours in the public service, with the many honourable testimonies of approbation which have already so far overrated, and overpaid them—reciting one consideration only which supersedes the necessity of recurring to every other.

"With these feelings in my heart, I don't need to elaborate on how anxious I am to have to decline a favor that is made all the more flattering by how it’s offered, as well as being genuinely kind. In explaining this, I won't compare my efforts in public service with the many honorable praises that have already exaggerated and compensated them—I'll mention only one consideration that overrides the need to refer to any others."

"When I was first called to the station with which I was honoured during the late conflict for our liberties, to the diffidence which I had so many reasons to feel in accepting it, I thought it my duty to join a firm resolution to shut my hand against every pecuniary recompense. To this resolution I have invariably adhered, and from it (if I had the inclination) I do not consider myself at liberty now to depart.

"When I was first appointed to the position I was honored with during the recent struggle for our freedoms, I had plenty of reasons to feel hesitant about accepting it. I believed it was my duty to firmly decide not to accept any financial compensation. I have consistently stuck to this decision, and even now, I don't feel it's right for me to change my mind."

"Whilst I repeat therefore my fervent acknowledgments to the legislature, for their very kind sentiments and intentions in my favour, and at the same time beg them to be persuaded that a remembrance of this singular proof of their goodness towards me, will never cease to cherish returns of the warmest affection and gratitude, I must pray that their act, so far as it has for its object my personal emolument, may not have its effect; but if it should please the general assembly to permit me to turn the destination of the fund vested in me, from my private emolument, to objects of a public nature, it will be my study, in selecting these, to prove the sincerity of my gratitude for the honour conferred upon me, by preferring such as may appear most subservient to the enlightened and patriotic views of the legislature."

"While I want to express my heartfelt thanks to the legislature for their kind feelings and intentions towards me, and I hope they understand that I will always remember this unique show of their kindness with deep affection and gratitude, I must say that I hope their action, aimed at my personal gain, doesn’t take effect. However, if it pleases the general assembly to allow me to redirect the fund entrusted to me from personal benefit to public purposes, I will make it a priority, in choosing these, to demonstrate my genuine gratitude for the honor given to me by selecting those that I believe align most closely with the enlightened and patriotic goals of the legislature."

The wish suggested in this letter, immediately received the sanction of the legislature; and at a subsequent time, the trust was executed by conveying the shares respectively to the use of a seminary of learning established in the vicinity of each river.

The request made in this letter quickly got approval from the legislature; later on, the trust was carried out by transferring the shares to benefit a school set up near each river.

General Washington felt too strong an interest in the success of these works, to refuse the presidency of the companies instituted for their completion. In conducting the affairs of the Potomac company, he took an active part: to that formed for opening the navigation of the James, he could only give his counsel.

General Washington was too invested in the success of these projects to turn down the presidency of the companies established for their completion. While managing the affairs of the Potomac company, he played an active role; for the company created to open the navigation of the James, he could only offer his advice.

These were not the only institutions which occasionally drew the farmer of Mount Vernon from his retreat, and continued him in the public view.

These weren't the only institutions that occasionally pulled the farmer of Mount Vernon out of his retreat and kept him in the public eye.

The sentiments with which the officers of the American army contemplated a final separation from each other, will be comprehended by all who are conversant with the finest feelings of the human heart. Companions in virtuous suffering, in danger, and in glory—attached to each other by common exertions made in a severe struggle for the attainment of a common object—they felt that to part for ever was a calamity too afflicting to be supported. The means of perpetuating those friendships which had been formed, and of renewing that endearing social intercourse which had taken place in camp, were universally desired. Perhaps, too, that esprit de corps which, identifying the individual with the community, transfers to the aggregate of the society a portion of that self-love which is felt by every private person, and which inspires in the members with a repugnance to the dissolution of the political, not unlike in effect to that which is excited at the dissolution of the natural body, was not without its influence in suggesting some expedient which might preserve the memory of the army, while it cheered the officers who were on the point of separating, with the hope that the separation would not be eternal: that at distant intervals, they might still communicate with each other: that the bonds by which they were connected would not be totally dissolved: and that, for many beneficial purposes, the patriots of the American army would still form one great society.

The feelings that the officers of the American army had as they faced a final separation from one another can be understood by anyone familiar with the deepest emotions of the human heart. As friends who endured hardship, faced danger, and achieved glory together—bound by their shared efforts in a tough fight for a common goal—they felt that parting forever was a loss too painful to bear. Everyone desired ways to maintain the friendships they had built and to revive the close social interactions that had happened in camp. Perhaps, too, that sense of unity, which connects individuals with their community, gave the whole group a bit of that self-love that each person feels, inspiring a reluctance to dissolve the political bonds, similar to how one might feel about the separation of the human body. This sentiment likely influenced them to suggest some way to keep the memory of the army alive while giving the officers who were about to part a hope that their separation wouldn't be permanent: that, over time, they could still connect with one another; that the ties that bound them would not completely break; and that for many positive reasons, the patriots of the American army would continue to form one large society.

Establishment of the society of the Cincinnati of which he is elected president.

This idea was suggested by General Knox, and was matured in a meeting composed of the generals, and of deputies from the regiments, at which Major General the Baron Steuben presided. An agreement was then entered into, by which the officers were to constitute themselves into one society of friends, to endure as long as they should endure, or any of their eldest male posterity; and, in failure thereof, any collateral branches who might be judged worthy of becoming its supporters and members, were to be admitted into it. To mark their veneration for that celebrated Roman between whose situation and their own they found some similitude, they were to be denominated, "The Society of the Cincinnati." Individuals of the respective states, distinguished for their patriotism and abilities, might be admitted as honorary members for life, provided their numbers should at no time exceed a ratio of one to four.

This idea was proposed by General Knox and was developed during a meeting of generals and representatives from the regiments, which was led by Major General Baron Steuben. An agreement was made for the officers to form a society of friends that would last as long as they did, or until any of their eldest male descendants, and if they failed to do so, any collateral relatives who were deemed worthy of being supporters and members would be allowed to join. To honor the famous Roman whose situation they found somewhat similar to their own, they would be called "The Society of the Cincinnati." Individuals from the respective states, recognized for their patriotism and skills, could be admitted as honorary lifetime members, as long as their numbers did not exceed a ratio of one to four.

The society was to be designated by a medal of gold representing the American eagle bearing on its breast the devices of the order, which was to be suspended by a ribbon of deep blue edged with white, descriptive of the union of America and France. To the ministers who had represented his Most Christian Majesty at Philadelphia, to the admirals who had commanded in the American seas, to the Count de Rochambeau, and the generals and colonels of the French troops who had served in the United States, the insignia of the order were to be presented, and they were to be invited to consider themselves as members of the society; at the head of which the Commander-in-chief was respectfully solicited to place his name. An incessant attention, on the part of the members, to the preservation of the exalted rights and liberties of human nature for which they had fought and bled, and an unalterable determination to promote and cherish between the respective states, union and national honour, were declared to be the immutable principles of the society. Its objects were, to perpetuate the remembrance of the American revolution, as well as cordial affection and the spirit of brotherly kindness among the officers; and to extend acts of beneficence to those officers and their families, whose situation might require assistance. To give effect to the charitable object of the institution, a common fund was to be created by the deposite of one month's pay on the part of every officer becoming a member; the product of which fund, after defraying certain necessary charges, was to be sacredly appropriated to this humane purpose.

The society would be represented by a gold medal featuring the American eagle, which would display the symbols of the order on its chest, and it would be suspended by a deep blue ribbon edged with white, symbolizing the union of America and France. The ministers who had represented his Most Christian Majesty in Philadelphia, the admirals who had commanded in American waters, Count de Rochambeau, and the generals and colonels of the French troops who served in the United States would receive the insignia of the order and be invited to see themselves as members of the society, with the Commander-in-chief's name respectfully requested to be at the top. Members would be expected to continually focus on preserving the fundamental rights and freedoms of humanity for which they had fought and sacrificed, and to be steadfast in promoting and cherishing unity and national honor between the respective states, which were declared as the unchanging principles of the society. Its goals were to keep the memory of the American Revolution alive, foster mutual affection and brotherly kindness among the officers, and provide assistance to those officers and their families who might be in need. To support the charitable mission of the organization, a common fund would be established through a deposit of one month’s pay from every officer joining as a member; once necessary expenses were covered, the proceeds from this fund would be dedicated to this humanitarian cause.

The military gentlemen of each state were to constitute a distinct society, deputies from which were to assemble triennially, in order to form a general meeting for the regulation of general concerns.

The military leaders from each state were to create a separate society, with representatives gathering every three years to hold a general meeting to manage overall issues.

Without encountering any open opposition, this institution was carried into complete effect; and its honours were sought, especially by the foreign officers, with great avidity. But soon after it was organized, those jealousies which in its first moments had been concealed, burst forth into open view. In October, 1783, a pamphlet was published by Mr. Burk of South Carolina, for the purpose of rousing the apprehensions of the public, and of directing its resentments against the society. Perceiving or believing that he perceived, in the Cincinnati, the foundation of an hereditary order, whose base, from associating with the military the chiefs of the powerful families in each state, would acquire a degree of solidity and strength admitting of any superstructure, he portrayed, in the fervid and infectious language of passion, the dangers to result from the fabric which would be erected on it. The ministers of the United States too in Europe, and the political theorists who cast their eyes towards the west for support to favourite systems, having the privileged orders constantly in view, were loud in their condemnations of an institution from which a race of nobles was expected to spring. The alarm was spread throughout every state, and a high degree of jealousy pervaded the mass of the people. In Massachusetts, the subject was even taken up by the legislature; and it was well understood that, in congress, the society was viewed with secret disapprobation.

Without facing any open opposition, this organization was fully established, and its honors were eagerly sought after, especially by foreign officers. However, soon after it was formed, the hidden rivalries that had initially been suppressed began to emerge openly. In October 1783, Mr. Burk from South Carolina published a pamphlet aimed at stirring up public fears and directing resentment towards the society. He perceived or thought he perceived in the Cincinnati the beginnings of an hereditary order, one that, by aligning the military with the leaders of powerful families in each state, could build a solid and strong foundation for something even greater. He described, in passionate and compelling language, the dangers that would arise from such a structure. U.S. ministers in Europe and political theorists looking to the west for support of their preferred systems, always keeping an eye on privileged orders, loudly condemned an institution that seemed likely to produce a class of nobles. Panic spread across every state, fueling significant jealousy among the populace. In Massachusetts, the legislature even took up the issue, and it was well known that Congress viewed the society with quiet disapproval.

"It was impossible for General Washington to view with indifference this state of the public feeling. Bound to the officers of his army by the strictest ties of esteem and affection, conscious of their merits, and assured of their attachment to his person, he was alive to every thing which might affect their reputation, or their interests. However innocent the institution might be in itself, or however laudable its real objects, if the impression it made on the public mind was such as to draw a line of distinction between the military men of America and their fellow citizens, he was earnest in his wishes to adopt such measures as would efface that impression. However ill founded the public prejudices might be, he thought this a case in which they ought to be respected; and, if it should be found impracticable to convince the people that their fears were misplaced, he was disposed to yield to them in a degree, and not to suffer that which was intended for the best of purposes, to produce a bad one."

"It was impossible for General Washington to remain indifferent to the current public sentiment. He was closely connected to the officers of his army through strong ties of respect and affection, fully aware of their abilities, and confident in their loyalty to him. He was sensitive to anything that could impact their reputation or interests. No matter how innocent the institution might be or how commendable its true goals, if it created a divide in the public's perception between America’s military personnel and their fellow citizens, he was determined to take steps to change that perception. Even if the public prejudices were unfounded, he believed that they should be taken seriously; and if convincing the people that their fears were unfounded proved impossible, he was willing to compromise and not let what was meant to be beneficial result in negative outcomes."

A general meeting was to be held in Philadelphia in May, 1784; and, in the mean time, he had been appointed the temporary president.

A general meeting was set to take place in Philadelphia in May 1784, and in the meantime, he had been named the temporary president.

To prepare the officers for those fundamental changes in the principles of the society, which he contemplated as a necessary sacrifice to the public apprehensions, his ideas were suggested to his military correspondents; and to give weight to the measures which might be recommended, his utmost influence was exerted to obtain a full assemblage of deputies, which should be respectable for its numbers, and for its wisdom.

To get the officers ready for the essential changes in the principles of society that he thought were necessary sacrifices to address public concerns, he shared his ideas with his military contacts. To support the measures that might be suggested, he used all his influence to gather a large assembly of deputies that would be notable for its size and wisdom.

Officers of high respectability entertained different opinions on surrendering those parts of the institution which were deemed objectionable. By some, the public clamour was attributed to a spirit of persecution, which only attached them more closely to the order. Many, it was said, were in quest of a cause of quarrel with their late protectors; and the removal of one ground of accusation against them, would only induce the substitution of some other. The source of the uneasiness which had been manifested was to be found in the temper of the people, not in the matters of which they complained; and if the present cause of irritation was removed, their ill humour would be openly and avowedly directed against the commutation.

Officers of high respectability had different opinions about giving up those parts of the institution that were considered problematic. Some believed the public outcry was driven by a sense of persecution, which only made them more loyal to the order. It was said that many were looking for a reason to argue with their former protectors, and removing one reason for criticism would only lead to the creation of another. The source of the discomfort that had been expressed was found in the people's attitude, not in the issues they raised; and if the current source of frustration was eliminated, their bad mood would turn openly and directly against the commutation.

General Washington was too much in the habit of considering subjects of difficulty in various points of view, and of deciding on them with coolness and deliberation, to permit his affections to influence his judgment. The most exact inquiries, assiduously made into the true state of the public mind, resulted in a conviction that opinions unfriendly to the institution, in its actual form, were extensively entertained; and that those opinions were founded, not in hostility to the late army, but in real apprehensions for equal liberty.

General Washington was so used to looking at difficult issues from different angles and making decisions calmly and thoughtfully that he didn’t let his feelings sway his judgment. Careful investigations into how the public really felt led to the understanding that a lot of people held negative opinions about the institution in its current form; these views were based not on hostility toward the recent army, but on genuine concerns for equal liberty.

A wise and necessary policy required, he thought, the removal of these apprehensions; and, at the general meeting in May, the hereditary principle, and the power of adopting honorary members, were relinquished. The result demonstrated the propriety of this alteration. Although a few who always perceive most danger where none exists, and the visionaries then abounding in Europe, continued their prophetic denunciations against the order, America dismissed her fears; and, notwithstanding the refusal of one or two of the state societies to adopt the measures recommended by the general meeting, the members of the Cincinnati were received as brethren into the bosom of their country.

A wise and necessary policy required, he thought, the removal of these fears; and at the general meeting in May, the hereditary principle and the ability to adopt honorary members were given up. The outcome showed that this change was the right move. While a few people who always see threats where none exist, along with the idealists then prevalent in Europe, kept making doomsday warnings against the order, America pushed aside her concerns. Despite one or two state societies refusing to follow the measures suggested by the general meeting, the members of the Cincinnati were welcomed as brothers into the heart of their country.

The causes which led to a change of the government of the United States.

While General Washington thus devoted a great part of his time to rural pursuits, to the duties of friendship, and to institutions of public utility, the political state of his country, becoming daily more embarrassed, attracted more and more deeply the anxious solicitude of every enlightened and virtuous patriot. From peace, from independence, and from governments of their own choice, the United States had confidently anticipated every blessing. The glorious termination of their contest with one of the most powerful nations of the earth; the steady and persevering courage with which that contest had been maintained; and the unyielding firmness with which the privations attending it had been supported, had surrounded the infant republics with a great degree of splendour, and had bestowed upon them a character which could be preserved only by a national and dignified system of conduct. A very short time was sufficient to demonstrate, that something not yet possessed was requisite, to insure the public and private prosperity expected to flow from self government. After a short struggle so to administer the existing system, as to make it competent to the great objects for which it was instituted, the effort became apparently desperate; and American affairs were impelled rapidly to a crisis, on which the continuance of the United States, as a nation, appeared to depend.

While General Washington spent a lot of his time on farming, nurturing friendships, and supporting public projects, the political situation in his country was getting more complicated every day, deeply concerning every informed and honorable patriot. The United States had confidently expected to gain many blessings from peace, independence, and governments of their own choosing. The successful resolution of their conflict with one of the most powerful nations in the world, the determination they showed throughout that struggle, and the resilience with which they endured the hardships associated with it had given the young republics a significant sense of pride and a reputation that could only be maintained through a national and dignified approach to governance. It only took a short time to show that something still needed to be established to ensure the public and private prosperity that self-governance was supposed to bring. After a brief attempt to run the existing system in a way that could achieve the important goals it was meant for, it became clear that the effort was nearly hopeless; American affairs quickly headed toward a crisis that seemed vital for the survival of the United States as a nation.

In tracing the causes which led to this interesting state of things, it will be necessary to carry back our attention to the conclusion of the war.

In examining the reasons that led to this intriguing situation, we need to focus our attention on the end of the war.

A government authorized to declare war, but relying on independent states for the means of prosecuting it; capable of contracting debts, and of pledging the public faith for their payment, but depending on thirteen distinct sovereignties for the preservation of that faith, could not be rescued from ignominy and contempt, but by finding those sovereignties administered by men exempt from the passions incident to human nature.

A government that can declare war but depends on independent states to carry it out; one that can take on debts and pledge public trust for repayment but relies on thirteen separate states to uphold that trust, cannot escape disgrace and scorn unless those states are governed by people free from the flaws of human nature.

The debts of the union were computed, on the first of January, 1783, at somewhat more than forty millions of dollars. "If," say congress, in an address to the states, urging that the means of payment should be placed in their hands, "other motives than that of justice could be requisite on this occasion, no nation could ever feel stronger; for to whom are the debts to be paid?

The union's debts were calculated, on January 1, 1783, at just over forty million dollars. "If," Congress says in a message to the states, urging that the means to pay should be provided to them, "any motivation beyond the duty of fairness were needed at this time, no country could have stronger reasons; for to whom are the debts owed?"

"To an ally, in the first place, who to the exertion of his arms in support of our cause has added the succours of his treasure; who to his important loans has added liberal donations, and whose loans themselves carry the impression of his magnanimity and friendship.

"To an ally, first of all, who has supported our cause not only through his military efforts but also by contributing his wealth; who has complemented his significant loans with generous gifts, and whose loans themselves reflect his generosity and friendship."

"To individuals in a foreign country, in the next place, who were the first to give so precious a token of their confidence in our justice, and of their friendship for our cause, and who are members of a republic which was second in espousing our rank among nations.

"To individuals in a foreign country, next, who were the first to offer such a valuable sign of their trust in our justice, and of their support for our cause, and who are part of a republic that was second in recognizing our status among nations."

Another class of creditors is, that illustrious and patriotic band of fellow citizens, whose blood and whose bravery have defended the liberties of their country, who have patiently borne, among other distresses, the privation of their stipends, whilst the distresses of their country disabled it from bestowing them: and who, even now, ask for no more than such a portion of their dues, as will enable them to retire from the field of victory and glory, into the bosom of peace and private citizenship, and for such effectual security for the residue of their claims, as their country is now unquestionably able to provide.

Another group of creditors is that great and patriotic group of fellow citizens, whose sacrifices and courage have defended the freedoms of their country. They have patiently endured, among other hardships, the lack of their payments while their country struggled to support them. Even now, they ask for nothing more than a portion of what they are owed, enough to allow them to leave the battlefield of victory and honor for a peaceful and private life, along with reliable assurance for the rest of their claims that their country can definitely provide now.

"The remaining class of creditors is composed partly of such of our fellow citizens as originally lent to the public the use of their funds, or have since manifested most confidence in their country, by receiving transfers from the lenders; and partly of those whose property has been either advanced or assumed for the public service. To discriminate the merits of these several descriptions of creditors, would be a task equally unnecessary and invidious. If the voice of humanity plead more loudly in favour of some than of others, the voice of policy, no less than of justice, pleads in favour of all. A wise nation will never permit those who relieve the wants of their country, or who rely most on its faith, its firmness, and its resources, when either of them is distrusted, to suffer by the event."

"The remaining group of creditors includes some of our fellow citizens who initially lent their money to the public and have since shown great trust in their country by accepting transfers from the lenders; it also includes those whose property has been either invested or taken over for the public good. Distinguishing the merits of these different types of creditors would be both unnecessary and contentious. While the voice of humanity may speak more strongly in favor of some than others, the voice of policy, as well as justice, supports all. A wise nation will never allow those who help meet the needs of their country, or those who have the most faith in its strength and resources, to suffer because of circumstances."

In a government constituted like that of the United States, it would readily be expected that great contrariety of sentiment would prevail, respecting the principles on which its affairs should be conducted. It has been already stated that the continent was divided into two great political parties, the one of which contemplated America as a nation, and laboured incessantly to invest the federal head with powers competent to the preservation of the union. The other attached itself to the state government, viewed all the powers of congress with jealousy, and assented reluctantly to measures which would enable the head to act, in any respect, independently of the members. Men of enlarged and liberal minds who, in the imbecility of a general government, by which alone the capacities of the nation could be efficaciously exerted, could discern the imbecility of the nation itself; who, viewing the situation of the world, could perceive the dangers to which these young republics were exposed, if not held together by a cement capable of preserving a beneficial connexion; who felt the full value of national honour, and the full obligation of national faith; and who were persuaded of the insecurity of both, if resting for their preservation on the concurrence of thirteen distinct sovereigns; arranged themselves generally in the first party. The officers of the army, whose local prejudices had been weakened by associating with each other, and whose experience had furnished lessons on the inefficacy of requisitions which were not soon to be forgotten, threw their weight almost universally into the same scale.

In a government set up like that of the United States, it’s to be expected that there would be strong disagreements about how to run its affairs. It’s already been mentioned that the country was split into two major political parties. One party saw America as a united nation and worked tirelessly to give the federal government the powers necessary to maintain that union. The other party focused on state governments, viewed Congressional powers with suspicion, and reluctantly agreed to measures that would allow the federal government to act independently of the states. People with open and progressive minds recognized that the weakness of the federal government was preventing the capabilities of the nation from being effectively utilized. They understood the dangers facing these young republics if they weren’t bonded by a strong connection, valued national honor, and recognized the importance of national trust—both of which would be insecure if relied on the agreement of thirteen separate sovereign states. Most of them aligned with the first party. The army officers, whose local biases faded from working together and whose experiences had shown them how ineffective demands could be, also largely supported this first party.

The other party, if not more intelligent, was more numerous, and more powerful. It was sustained by prejudices and feelings which grew without effort, and gained strength from the intimate connexions subsisting between a state and its citizens. It required a concurrence of extrinsic circumstances to force on minds unwilling to receive the demonstration, a conviction of the necessity of an effective national government, and to give even a temporary ascendency to that party which had long foreseen and deplored the crisis to which the affairs of the United States were hastening.

The other party, if not smarter, was larger and more powerful. It was backed by biases and emotions that developed easily and grew stronger from the close connections between a state and its citizens. It took a combination of outside factors to push people who were reluctant to accept the evidence to realize the need for a strong national government, and to temporarily elevate the party that had long predicted and lamented the crisis that the United States was heading toward.

Sensible that the character of the government would be decided, in a considerable degree, by the measures which should immediately follow the treaty of peace, gentlemen of the first political abilities and integrity sought a place in the congress of 1783. Combining their efforts for the establishment of principles on which the honour and the interest of the nation were believed to depend, they exerted all their talents to impress on the several states, the necessity of conferring on the government of the union, powers which might be competent to its preservation, and which would enable it to comply with the engagements it had formed. With unwearied perseverance they digested and obtained the assent of congress to a system, which, though unequal to what their wishes would have prepared, or their judgments have approved, was believed to be the best that was attainable. The great object in view was, "to restore and support public credit," to effect which it was necessary, "to obtain from the states substantial funds for funding the whole debt of the United States."

Sensible that the nature of the government would largely be shaped by the actions that would follow the peace treaty, skilled and honest individuals aimed for positions in the Congress of 1783. They joined forces to establish principles believed to be essential for the nation's honor and interests, and they worked tirelessly to convince the various states of the need to give the federal government the powers it needed for its survival and to fulfill its commitments. With relentless determination, they formulated and secured Congress's approval of a system that, while not as perfect as they had hoped or envisioned, was seen as the best that could be achieved. The main goal was "to restore and support public credit," which required "obtaining substantial funds from the states to cover the entire debt of the United States."

The committee[26] to whom this interesting subject was referred, reported sundry resolutions, recommending it to the several states, to vest in congress permanent and productive funds adequate to the immediate payment of the interest on the national debt, and to the gradual extinction of the principal. A change in the rule by which the proportions of the different states were to be ascertained, was also recommended. In lieu of that article of the confederation which apportions on them the sums required for the public treasury, according to the value of their located lands with the improvements thereon, it was proposed to substitute another more capable of execution, which should make the population of each state the measure of its contribution.[27]

The committee[26] that was assigned this interesting topic reported several resolutions, urging the states to give Congress permanent and productive funds that are enough to cover the immediate interest payments on the national debt and gradually pay off the principal. They also recommended a change in the way the contributions from different states were calculated. Instead of the current rule from the confederation, which determines the amounts based on the value of their located lands and improvements, they proposed a new rule that would use the population of each state as the basis for its contribution.[27]

To the application which congress had made during the war for power to levy an impost of five per cent on imported and prize goods, one state had never assented, and another had withdrawn the assent it had previously given.

To the request that Congress made during the war for the power to impose a five percent tax on imported and prize goods, one state never agreed, and another took back its previous approval.

It was impossible to yield to some of the objections which had been made to this measure, because they went to the certain destruction of the system itself; but in points where the alterations demanded, though mischievous, were not fatal to the plan, it was thought adviseable to accommodate the recommendations of the government to the prejudices which had been disclosed. It had been insisted that the power of appointing persons to collect the duties, would enable congress to introduce into a state, officers unknown and unaccountable to the government thereof; and that a power to collect an indefinite sum for an indefinite time, for the expenditure of which that body could not be accountable to the states, would render it independent of its constituents, and would be dangerous to liberty. To obviate these objections, the proposition now made was so modified, that the grant was to be limited to twenty-five years; was to be strictly appropriated to the debt contracted on account of the war; and was to be collected by persons to be appointed by the respective states.

It was impossible to agree with some of the objections raised against this measure because they threatened the very survival of the system itself; however, in areas where the suggested changes, although harmful, were not detrimental to the overall plan, it was deemed wise to adjust the government's recommendations to address the concerns that had been expressed. There was a strong belief that the power to appoint individuals to collect duties would allow Congress to send in officials unknown to the local government, and that having the authority to collect an unlimited amount for an unspecified time—without accountability to the states—would make it independent of its constituents and potentially endanger liberty. To address these concerns, the current proposal was modified so that the grant would be limited to twenty-five years, strictly dedicated to the debt incurred from the war, and would be collected by individuals appointed by the respective states.

After a debate, which the tedious mode of conducting business protracted for several weeks, the report was adopted; and a committee, consisting of Mr. Madison, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Ellsworth, was appointed to prepare an address, which should accompany the recommendation to the several states.

After a lengthy debate that dragged on for several weeks, the report was approved; and a committee made up of Mr. Madison, Mr. Hamilton, and Mr. Ellsworth was assigned to create a letter to accompany the recommendation to the various states.

After a full explanation of the principles on which the system had been framed, this address proceeds:—"The plan thus communicated and explained by congress, must now receive its fate from their constituents. All the objects comprised in it are conceived to be of great importance to the happiness of this confederated republic, are necessary to render the fruits of the revolution a full reward for the blood, the toils, the cares and the calamities which have purchased it. But the object of which the necessity will be peculiarly felt, and which it is peculiarly the duty of congress to inculcate, is the provision recommended for the national debt. Although this debt is greater than could have been wished, it is still less on the whole than could have been expected; and when referred to the cause in which it has been incurred, and compared with the burthens which wars of ambition and of vain glory have entailed on other nations, ought to be borne not only with cheerfulness but with pride. But the magnitude of the debt makes no part of the question. It is sufficient that the debt has been fairly contracted, and that justice and good faith demand that it should be fully discharged. Congress had no option but between different modes of discharging it. The same option is the only one that can exist with the states. The mode which has, after long and elaborate discussion, been preferred, is, we are persuaded, the least objectionable of any that would have been equal to the purpose. Under this persuasion, we call upon the justice and plighted faith of the several states to give it its proper effect, to reflect on the consequences of rejecting it, and to remember that congress will not be answerable for them."

After a detailed explanation of the principles that shaped the system, this address continues:—"The plan shared and clarified by Congress must now face judgment from their constituents. All the goals included are considered vital to the happiness of this united republic and are necessary to ensure that the outcomes of the revolution are a fitting reward for the sacrifice, effort, worries, and hardships that have brought it about. However, the issue that will be particularly felt and that it is especially Congress's responsibility to emphasize is the recommended provision for the national debt. Although this debt is larger than desired, it is still overall less than expected; and when considered in light of the reasons it was incurred, and compared to the burdens that wars of ambition and empty glory have imposed on other nations, it should be accepted not only with willingness but with pride. However, the size of the debt is not the main issue. It is enough that the debt was incurred legitimately, and that justice and good faith require it to be fully paid off. Congress had no choice but to consider different ways to handle it. The same choice is the only one that the states have. The method that has been chosen after extensive discussion is, we believe, the least objectionable of all that could meet the goal. With this belief, we urge the justice and commitment of the various states to implement it correctly, to think about the implications of rejecting it, and to remember that Congress will not be held accountable for those consequences."

After expatiating on the merits of the several creditors, the report concludes, "let it be remembered finally, that it ever has been the pride and boast of America, that the rights for which she contended, were the rights of human nature. By the blessing of the Author of these rights, on the means exerted for their defence, they have prevailed against all opposition, and formed the basis of thirteen independent states. No instance has heretofore occurred, nor can any instance be expected hereafter to occur, in which the unadulterated forms of republican government can pretend to so fair an opportunity of justifying themselves by their fruits. In this view, the citizens of the United States are responsible for the greatest trust ever confided to a political society. If justice, good faith, honour, gratitude, and all the other good qualities which ennoble the character of a nation, and fulfil the ends of government, be the fruits of our establishments, the cause of liberty will acquire a dignity and lustre which it has never yet enjoyed; and an example will be set, which can not but have the most favourable influence on the rights of mankind. If, on the other side, our governments should be unfortunately blotted with the reverse of these cardinal and essential virtues, the great cause which we have engaged to vindicate will be dishonoured and betrayed; the last and fairest experiment in favour of the rights of human nature will be turned against them, and their patrons and friends exposed to be insulted and silenced by the votaries of tyranny and usurpation."

After discussing the advantages of the various creditors, the report concludes, "Let’s remember that it has always been America's pride and claim that the rights we fought for are the rights of humanity. Thanks to the blessing of the Creator of these rights, and the efforts made to defend them, they have triumphed over all opposition and established the foundation for thirteen independent states. There has never been a situation before, nor can we expect one in the future, where the true forms of republican government have such a great chance to prove themselves by their successes. From this perspective, the citizens of the United States are entrusted with the most significant responsibility ever given to a political society. If justice, good faith, honor, gratitude, and all the other qualities that elevate a nation's character and fulfill the purposes of government come from our institutions, then the cause of liberty will gain a level of honor and brilliance it has never had before; and we will set an example that will positively impact the rights of all people. On the other hand, if our governments unfortunately become tainted with the opposite of these fundamental virtues, the important cause we have committed to defending will be dishonored and betrayed; the last and most promising experiment for human rights will be turned against them, leaving their supporters vulnerable to being insulted and silenced by the followers of tyranny and oppression."

For the complete success of the plan recommended by congress, no person felt more anxious solicitude than General Washington. Of the vital importance of UNION, no man could be more entirely persuaded; and of the obligations of the government to its creditors, no man could feel a stronger conviction. His conspicuous station had rendered him peculiarly sensible to their claims; and he had unavoidably been personally instrumental in the creation of a part of them. All the feelings of his heart were deeply engaged in the payment of some of the creditors, and that high sense of national honour, of national justice, and of national faith, of which elevated minds endowed with integrity can never be divested, impelled him to take a strong interest in the security of all. Availing himself of the usage of communicating on national subjects with the state governments, and of the opportunity, which his approaching resignation of the command of the army gave, impressively to convey his sentiments to them, he had determined to employ all the influence which the circumstances of his life had created, in a solemn recommendation of measures, on which he believed the happiness and prosperity of his country to depend. On the eighth of June, 1783, he addressed to the governors of the several states respectively, the paternal and affectionate letter which follows.

For the complete success of the plan suggested by Congress, no one felt more anxious than General Washington. No one was more convinced of the vital importance of unity; and no one felt a stronger obligation to the government’s creditors. His prominent position made him especially aware of their claims, and he had inevitably played a personal role in creating some of them. All his feelings were deeply invested in paying some of the creditors, and that strong sense of national honor, justice, and faith, which people of integrity can never ignore, drove him to care deeply about the security of all. Taking advantage of the established practice of communicating on national issues with state governments, and seizing the opportunity presented by his upcoming resignation as commander of the army to express his views, he decided to use all the influence he had gained throughout his life to earnestly recommend measures he believed were essential for the happiness and prosperity of his country. On June 8, 1783, he sent a sincere and warm letter to the governors of the various states, which follows.

Letters of General Washington to the governors of the several states.

"Sir,

"Sir,"

"The great object for which I had the honour to hold an appointment in the service of my country being accomplished, I am now preparing to resign it into the hands of congress, and to return to that domestic retirement which, it is well known, I left with the greatest reluctance; a retirement for which I have never ceased to sigh through a long and painful absence, and in which (remote from the noise and trouble of the world) I meditate to pass the remainder of life in a state of undisturbed repose. But before I carry this resolution into effect, I think it a duty incumbent upon me, to make this my last official communication; to congratulate you on the glorious events which heaven has been pleased to produce in our favour; to offer my sentiments respecting some important subjects which appear to me to be intimately connected with the tranquillity of the United States: to take my leave of your excellency as a public character: and to give my final blessing to that country in whose service I have spent the prime of my life, for whose sake I have consumed so many anxious days and watchful nights, and whose happiness, being extremely dear to me, will always constitute no inconsiderable part of my own.

"The main purpose for which I had the honor to hold a position in the service of my country has been achieved, and now I’m getting ready to resign it to Congress and return to the quiet life I left with great reluctance. I have longed for this retirement throughout my painful absence, and I plan to spend the rest of my life in peace, away from the noise and troubles of the world. But before I follow through on this decision, I feel it is my duty to make this my final official message: to congratulate you on the wonderful events that have come our way; to share my thoughts on important issues that I believe are closely linked to the peace of the United States; to say goodbye to your excellency as a public figure; and to give my final blessing to the country in which I have dedicated the best years of my life, for which I have spent so many anxious days and sleepless nights, and whose well-being is extremely important to me and will always be a significant part of my own happiness."

"Impressed with the liveliest sensibility on this pleasing occasion, I will claim the indulgence of dilating the more copiously on the subjects of our mutual felicitation. When we consider the magnitude of the prize we contended for, the doubtful nature of the contest, and the favourable manner in which it has terminated, we shall find the greatest possible reason for gratitude and rejoicing. This is a theme that will afford infinite delight to every benevolent and liberal mind, whether the event in contemplation be considered as the source of present enjoyment, or the parent of future happiness: and we shall have equal occasion to felicitate ourselves on the lot which Providence has assigned us, whether we view it in a natural, a political, or moral point of light.

"Feeling truly inspired on this wonderful occasion, I want to take a moment to elaborate more on the topics we’re celebrating together. When we think about the significance of what we've achieved, the uncertainty of the competition, and the favorable way it has turned out, we have every reason to be grateful and joyful. This is a topic that will bring immense pleasure to any kind-hearted and open-minded person, whether we see this event as a source of current joy or a promise of future happiness: and we have just as much reason to celebrate our situation as determined by Providence, whether we look at it from a natural, political, or moral perspective."

"The citizens of America, placed in the most enviable condition, as the sole lords and proprietors of a vast tract of continent, comprehending all the various soils and climates of the world, and abounding with all the necessaries and conveniencies of life, are now, by the late satisfactory pacification, acknowledged to be possessed of absolute freedom and independency. They are from this period, to be considered as the actors on a most conspicuous theatre, which seems to be peculiarly designated by Providence for the display of human greatness and felicity. Here they are not only surrounded with every thing which can contribute to the completion of private and domestic enjoyment; but heaven has crowned all its other blessings, by giving a fairer opportunity for political happiness, than any other nation has ever been favoured with. Nothing can illustrate these observations more forcibly, than a recollection of the happy conjuncture of times and circumstances, under which our republic assumed its rank among the nations. The foundation of our empire was not laid in the gloomy age of ignorance and superstition, but at an epoch when the rights of mankind were better understood, and more clearly defined, than at any former period. The researches of the human mind after social happiness have been carried to a great extent; the treasures of knowledge acquired by the labours of philosophers, sages, and legislators, through a long succession of years, are laid open for our use; and their collected wisdom may be happily employed in the establishment of our forms of government. The free cultivation of letters; the unbounded extension of commerce; the progressive refinement of manners; the growing liberality of sentiment; and above all, the pure and benign light of revelation; have had a meliorating influence on mankind, and increased the blessings of society. At this auspicious period, the United States came into existence as a nation; and if their citizens should not be completely free and happy, the fault will be entirely their own.

"The citizens of America, in a truly enviable position as the sole owners of a vast expanse of land, which includes a variety of soils and climates and is rich in the essentials and comforts of life, are now recognized, thanks to the recent peace agreement, as having complete freedom and independence. From this point forward, they are to be seen as the main actors on a prominent stage that seems particularly set by Providence for showcasing human greatness and happiness. Here, they are not only surrounded by everything that can enhance personal and family enjoyment, but heaven has also blessed them with a greater opportunity for political happiness than any other nation has ever had. Nothing illustrates this point better than remembering the fortunate timing and circumstances under which our republic gained its status among nations. The foundation of our empire wasn't established during a dark age of ignorance and superstition, but at a time when the rights of mankind were better understood and more clearly defined than ever before. The pursuit of social happiness by the human mind has profoundly progressed; the insights gained from the efforts of philosophers, sages, and lawmakers over many years are available for us to use, and their combined wisdom can be effectively utilized in shaping our government structures. The free pursuit of knowledge, the limitless expansion of trade, the gradual improvement of manners, the increasing openness of thought, and above all, the clear and kind light of revelation have positively affected humanity and enhanced society's blessings. During this promising time, the United States emerged as a nation; and if its citizens are not completely free and happy, the responsibility will lie entirely with them."

"Such is our situation, and such are our prospects. But notwithstanding the cup of blessing is thus reached out to us; notwithstanding happiness is ours, if we have a disposition to seize the occasion, and make it our own; yet, it appears to me, there is an option still left to the United States of America; that it is in their choice, and depends upon their conduct, whether they will be respectable and prosperous, or contemptible and miserable as a nation. This is the time of their political probation; this is the moment when the eyes of the whole world are turned upon them; this is the moment to establish or ruin their national character forever; this is the favourable moment to give such a tone to our federal government, as will enable it to answer the ends of its institution, or this may be the ill-fated moment for relaxing the powers of the union, annihilating the cement of the confederation, and exposing us to become the sport of European politics, which may play one state against another, to prevent their growing importance, and to serve their own interested purposes. For according to the system of policy the states shall adopt at this moment, they will stand or fall; and by their confirmation or lapse, it is yet to be decided, whether the revolution must ultimately be considered a blessing or a curse:—a blessing or a curse not to the present age alone, for with our fate will the destiny of unborn millions be involved.

"That’s where we stand, and that’s what our future looks like. However, even though the opportunity for blessing is right in front of us; even though happiness is ours if we’re willing to take it and make it ours; it seems to me that the United States still has a choice. It’s up to them, and it depends on their actions, whether they will be a respected and prosperous nation or a contemptible and miserable one. This is their moment of political testing; this is when the whole world is watching them; this is the chance to establish or ruin their national character forever. This is the perfect time to shape our federal government to fulfill its purpose, or it could be the disastrous moment to weaken the powers of the union, destroy the foundation of the confederation, and leave us vulnerable to the whims of European politics, which might pit one state against another to undermine their growth and serve their own interests. The path that the states choose at this moment will determine whether they succeed or fail; and by their commitment or failure, we’ll see if the revolution will ultimately be seen as a blessing or a curse— a blessing or a curse not just for this generation, but for the fate of countless future generations."

"With this conviction of the importance of the present crisis, silence in me would be a crime. I will therefore speak to your excellency the language of freedom and of sincerity, without disguise. I am aware, however, that those who differ from me in political sentiment, may perhaps remark that I am stepping out of the proper line of my duty, and may possibly ascribe to arrogance or ostentation, what I know is alone the result of the purest intentions. But the rectitude of my own heart, which disdains such unworthy motives; the part I have hitherto acted in life; the determination I have formed of not taking any share in public business hereafter; the ardent desire I feel, and shall continue to manifest, of quietly enjoying, in private life, after all the toils of war, the benefits of a wise and liberal government: will, I flatter myself, sooner or later convince my countrymen, that I could have no sinister views in delivering with so little reserve the opinions contained in this address.

"Given how crucial this crisis is, staying silent wouldn’t be right. So, I’m going to speak to you, your excellency, with honesty and openness, without holding back. I know, though, that some people might think I’m overstepping my role and could see my words as arrogance or showiness, while I truly mean it with the best intentions. But I believe in the integrity of my heart, which rejects such unworthy ideas; my past actions; my choice to step back from public affairs in the future; and my strong desire to peacefully enjoy the benefits of a thoughtful and generous government during my private life after all the struggles of war: I hope these will, soon or later, show my fellow citizens that I have no hidden agenda in sharing my thoughts so candidly in this address."

"There are four things which I humbly conceive are essential to the well being, I may even venture to say, to the existence of the United States as an independent power.

"There are four things that I genuinely believe are essential to the well-being, and I might even say, the existence of the United States as an independent power."

1st. An indissoluble union of the states under one federal head.

1st. A permanent union of the states under one federal government.

2d. A sacred regard to public justice.

2d. A deep respect for public justice.

3d. The adoption of a proper peace establishment, and,

3d. The establishment of a solid peace agreement, and,

4th. The prevalence of that pacific and friendly disposition, among the people of the United States, which will induce them to forget their local prejudices and politics, to make those mutual concessions which are requisite to the general prosperity, and in some instances, to sacrifice their individual advantages to the interest of the community.

4th. The widespread peaceful and friendly attitude among the people of the United States will encourage them to overlook their local biases and political differences, to make the necessary compromises for overall prosperity, and in some cases, to put the needs of the community above their own individual benefits.

"These are the pillars on which the glorious fabric of our independency and national character must be supported. Liberty is the basis, and whoever would dare to sap the foundation, or overturn the structure, under whatever specious pretext he may attempt it, will merit the bitterest execration, and the severest punishment, which can be inflicted by his injured country.

"These are the pillars that support the proud foundation of our independence and national identity. Freedom is the core, and anyone who tries to undermine the foundation or dismantle the structure, no matter what convincing excuse they use, deserves the strongest condemnation and the harshest punishment that can be imposed by their wounded country."

"On the three first articles, I will make a few observations, leaving the last to the good sense and serious consideration of those immediately concerned.

"Regarding the first three articles, I’ll share a few thoughts, leaving the final one to the sound judgment and serious consideration of those directly involved."

"Under the first head, although it may not be necessary or proper for me, in this place, to enter into a particular disquisition of the principles of the union, and to take up the great question which has frequently been agitated, whether it be expedient and requisite for the states to delegate a larger proportion of power to congress or not; yet it will be a part of my duty, and that of every true patriot, to assert without reserve, and to insist upon the following positions: that unless the states will suffer congress to exercise those prerogatives they are undoubtedly invested with by the constitution, every thing must very rapidly tend to anarchy and confusion: that it is indispensable to the happiness of the individual states, that there should be lodged somewhere a supreme power to regulate and govern the general concerns of the confederated republic, without which the union can not be of long duration: that there must be a faithful and pointed compliance, on the part of every state, with the late proposals and demands of congress, or the most fatal consequences will ensue: that whatever measures have a tendency to dissolve the union, or contribute to violate or lessen the sovereign authority, ought to be considered as hostile to the liberty and independence of America, and the authors of them treated accordingly: and lastly, that unless we can be enabled, by the concurrence of the states, to participate of the fruits of the revolution, and enjoy the essential benefits of civil society, under a form of government so free and uncorrupted, so happily guarded against the danger of oppression as has been devised and adopted by the articles of confederation, it will be a subject of regret, that so much blood and treasure have been lavished for no purpose; that so many sufferings have been encountered without a compensation; and that so many sacrifices have been made in vain. Many other considerations might here be adduced to prove, that without an entire conformity to the spirit of the union, we can not exist as an independent power. It will be sufficient for my purpose to mention one or two, which seem to me of the greatest importance. It is only in our united character that we are known as an empire, that our independence is acknowledged, that our power can be regarded, or our credit supported among foreign nations. The treaties of the European powers with the United States of America, will have no validity on a dissolution of the union. We shall be left nearly in a state of nature, or we may find, by our own unhappy experience, that there is a natural and necessary progression from the extreme of anarchy to the extreme of tyranny; and that arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness.

"Under the first point, while it may not be necessary or appropriate for me to go into detail about the principles of the union here, and to address the important question of whether it's wise and necessary for the states to give more power to congress, I still find it my duty, along with every true patriot, to firmly state the following: unless the states allow congress to use the powers granted to it by the constitution, everything will quickly lead to chaos and disorder. It's vital for the well-being of the individual states that there is a central authority to manage and govern the common issues of the united republic; without this, the union cannot last long. Each state must comply fully with the recent proposals and demands from congress, or we will face serious consequences. Any actions that aim to break apart the union or undermine sovereign authority should be seen as threats to the freedom and independence of America, and those responsible should be treated accordingly. Lastly, if we cannot, through cooperation among the states, reap the benefits of the revolution and enjoy the essential advantages of civil society under a government that is as free, uncorrupted, and well-protected against the risk of oppression as designed by the articles of confederation, it will be regrettable that so much blood and treasure have been spent for nothing; that many have suffered with no reward; and that so many sacrifices have been made in vain. Many other reasons could be presented to demonstrate that without complete adherence to the spirit of the union, we cannot function as an independent nation. For my purposes, it will suffice to mention a few that seem most critical. It is only as a united entity that we are recognized as an empire, that our independence is acknowledged, and that our power can be respected, or our credibility maintained among foreign countries. Treaties made by European powers with the United States will lose their validity if the union dissolves. We would be left nearly in a state of nature, or we may discover, through unfortunate experience, that there is a natural and necessary shift from total chaos to total tyranny; and that arbitrary power easily rises on the ashes of liberty misused for licentiousness."

"As to the second article, which respects the performance of public justice, congress have in their late address to the United States, almost exhausted the subject. They have explained their ideas so fully, and have enforced the obligations the states are under, to render complete justice to all the public creditors, with so much dignity and energy, that in my opinion, no real friend to the honour and independency of America, can hesitate a single moment respecting the propriety of complying with the just and honourable measures proposed. If their arguments do not produce conviction, I know of nothing that will have greater influence; especially when we recollect that the system referred to, being the result of the collected wisdom of the continent, must be esteemed, if not perfect, certainly the least objectionable of any that could be devised; and that if it should not be carried into immediate execution, a national bankruptcy, with all its deplorable consequences, will take place before any different plan can possibly be proposed and adopted. So pressing are the present circumstances, and such is the alternative now offered to the states.

"As for the second point regarding the execution of public justice, Congress has almost covered the topic in their recent address to the United States. They've fully explained their views and emphasized the responsibilities of the states to deliver complete justice to all public creditors with such dignity and vigor that, in my opinion, no true supporter of America's honor and independence can doubt the appropriateness of following the just and honorable actions suggested. If their arguments fail to convince, I can't think of anything that would have more impact; especially when we remember that the system in question is the product of the combined wisdom of the continent and should be regarded, if not perfect, certainly as the least objectionable option available. If it isn't implemented immediately, a national bankruptcy with all its terrible consequences will occur before any alternative plan can possibly be proposed and adopted. The current situation is urgent, and this is the choice now presented to the states."

"The ability of the country to discharge the debts which have been incurred in its defence is not to be doubted; an inclination I flatter myself will not be wanting. The path of our duty is plain before us—honesty will be found, on every experiment, to be the best and only true policy. Let us then as a nation, be just; let us fulfil the public contracts which congress had undoubtedly a right to make, for the purpose of carrying on the war, with the same good faith we suppose ourselves bound to perform our private engagements. In the mean time, let an attention to the cheerful performance of their proper business as individuals, and as members of society, be earnestly inculcated on the citizens of America. Then will they strengthen the hands of government, and be happy under its protection. Every one will reap the fruit of his labours; every one will enjoy his own acquisitions, without molestation, and without danger.

"The country's ability to pay off the debts incurred for its defense is beyond doubt; I believe there will be a willingness to do so. The right path for us is clear—honesty will prove to be the best and only true policy every time. So, as a nation, let’s be fair; let’s honor the public contracts that Congress certainly had the right to make for the purpose of waging the war, with the same good faith we expect from our private commitments. In the meantime, we should strongly encourage citizens of America to focus on successfully carrying out their responsibilities both as individuals and as members of society. This way, they will support the government and thrive under its protection. Everyone will benefit from their hard work; everyone will enjoy their possessions without interference and without fear."

"In this state of absolute freedom and perfect security, who will grudge to yield a very little of his property to support the common interest of society, and insure the protection of government? Who does not remember the frequent declarations, at the commencement of the war, that we should be completely satisfied, if at the expense of one half, we could defend the remainder of our possessions? Where is the man to be found who wishes to remain indebted for the defence of his own person and property, to the exertions, the bravery, and the blood of others, without making one generous effort to repay the debt of honour and of gratitude? In what part of the continent shall we find any man or body of men, who would not blush to stand up and propose measures purposely calculated to rob the soldier of his stipend, and the public creditor of his due? And were it possible that such a flagrant instance of injustice could ever happen, would it not excite the general indignation, and tend to bring down upon the authors of such measures, the aggravated vengeance of heaven? If, after all, a spirit of disunion, or a temper of obstinacy and perverseness, should manifest itself in any of the states; if such an ungracious disposition should attempt to frustrate all the happy effects that might be expected to flow from the union; if there should be a refusal to comply with the requisitions for funds to discharge the annual interest of the public debts; and if that refusal should revive again all those jealousies, and produce all those evils, which are now happily removed; congress, who have in all their transactions, shown a great degree of magnanimity and justice, will stand justified in the sight of God and man; and the state alone which puts itself in opposition to the aggregate wisdom of the continent, and follows such mistaken and pernicious counsels, will be responsible for all the consequences.

"In this state of complete freedom and total security, who would hesitate to give up a small portion of their property to support the common good of society and ensure government protection? Who doesn’t remember the frequent statements at the start of the war that we would be fully satisfied if, by sacrificing half, we could defend the other half of our possessions? Where can we find anyone who wants to rely on the efforts, bravery, and sacrifices of others to defend their own life and property without making a sincere effort to repay that debt of honor and gratitude? In what part of the continent would anyone be bold enough to propose actions intended to rob soldiers of their pay and public creditors of what is owed to them? And if, by some chance, such a blatant act of injustice were to happen, wouldn’t it provoke widespread outrage and bring down the wrath of heaven on those responsible for such actions? If, after all this, a spirit of division or stubbornness arises in any of the states; if such an ungrateful attitude tries to undermine all the positive outcomes expected from unity; if there’s a refusal to meet the requests for funds to cover the annual interest on public debts; and if that refusal rekindles past jealousies and causes the evils that are now thankfully gone; Congress, which has shown a high level of nobility and fairness in all their actions, will be justified in the eyes of God and men; and the state that opposes the collective wisdom of the continent, following such misguided and harmful advice, will be held accountable for all the consequences."

"For my own part, conscious of having acted while a servant of the public, in the manner I conceived best suited to promote the real interests of my country; having, in consequence of my fixed belief, in some measure pledged myself to the army, that their country would finally do them complete and ample justice; and not wishing to conceal any instance of my official conduct from the eyes of the world; I have thought proper to transmit to your excellency the enclosed collection of papers, relative to the half pay and commutation granted by congress to the officers of the army. From these communications, my decided sentiments will be clearly comprehended, together with the conclusive reasons which induced me, at an early period, to recommend the adoption of the measure, in the most earnest and serious manner. As the proceedings of congress, the army, and myself, are open to all, and contain, in my opinion, sufficient information to remove the prejudices, and errors, which may have been entertained by any, I think it unnecessary to say any thing more than just to observe, that the resolutions of congress now alluded to, are undoubtedly as absolutely binding upon the United States, as the most solemn acts of confederation or legislation. As to the idea which I am informed, has in some instances prevailed, that the half pay and commutation are to be regarded merely in the odious light of a pension, it ought to be exploded for ever. That provision should be viewed as it really was, a reasonable compensation offered by congress, at a time when they had nothing else to give to the officers of the army, for services then to be performed. It was the only means to prevent a total dereliction of the service.—It was a part of their hire.—I may be allowed to say it was the price of their blood, and of your independence. It is therefore more than a common debt; it is a debt of honour. It can never be considered as a pension, or gratuity; nor be cancelled until it is fairly discharged.

"For my part, aware that I acted as a public servant in what I believed was the best way to promote my country’s true interests; having, because of my firm belief, somewhat committed myself to the army, that their country would ultimately give them full and fair justice; and not wanting to hide any instance of my official conduct from the public eye; I felt it was important to send your excellency the enclosed collection of documents about the half pay and commutation granted by Congress to the army officers. These communications will make my strong opinions clear, along with the compelling reasons that led me, early on, to strongly recommend the adoption of this measure. Since the actions of Congress, the army, and myself are open to everyone and provide enough information to dispel any misconceptions or errors, I don't think I need to add anything more than to point out that the resolutions of Congress mentioned here are undoubtedly as binding on the United States as the most serious acts of confederation or legislation. As for the notion that, in some cases, has been expressed, that the half pay and commutation should be viewed merely as a troublesome pension, that idea should be permanently discarded. This provision should be seen for what it truly is: a fair compensation offered by Congress at a time when they had nothing else to give the army officers for services yet to be performed. It was the only way to prevent a total abandonment of the service. It formed part of their pay. I may be allowed to say it was the price of their sacrifices and of your independence. Therefore, it is more than just a common debt; it is a debt of honor. It should never be seen as a pension or a gift, nor can it be canceled until it is fully paid."

"With regard to a distinction between officers and soldiers, it is sufficient that the uniform experience of every nation of the world, combined with your own, proves the utility and propriety of the discrimination. Rewards in proportion to the aids the public derives from them, are unquestionably due to all its servants. In some lines, the soldiers have perhaps generally had as ample a compensation for their services, by the large bounties which have been paid to them, as their officers will receive in the proposed commutation; in others, if besides the donation of lands, the payment of arrearages, of clothing and wages, (in which articles all the component parts of the army must be put upon the same footing,) we take into the estimate the bounties many of the soldiers have received, and the gratuity of one year's full pay which is promised to all, possibly their situation (every circumstance duly considered) will not be deemed less eligible than that of the officers. Should a further reward, however, be judged equitable, I will venture to assert, no one will enjoy greater satisfaction than myself, on seeing an exemption from taxes for a limited time, (which has been petitioned for in some instances,) or any other adequate immunity or compensation, granted to the brave defenders of their country's cause. But neither the adoption nor rejection of this proposition will in any manner affect, much less militate against, the act of congress, by which they have offered five years full pay, in lieu of the half pay for life, which had been before promised to the officers of the army.

"Regarding the difference between officers and soldiers, it's clear that the common experience of every nation worldwide, along with your own, shows the importance and appropriateness of this distinction. Rewards proportional to the benefits the public gets from them are undeniably owed to all public servants. In some areas, soldiers may have generally received as much compensation for their services through the significant bounties they've earned as their officers will get from the proposed payment change. In other areas, if we factor in not just the land donations but also the payments for back pay, clothing, and wages (where all army members should be treated equally), along with the bounties many soldiers have received and the promised full year’s pay for all, then perhaps their situation (considering all factors) won’t be considered less favorable than that of the officers. However, if further rewards are deemed fair, I would personally be very pleased to see tax exemptions for a limited time (which has been requested in some cases) or any other suitable benefits or compensation granted to the brave defenders of their country. But whether this proposal is accepted or rejected will not change, let alone oppose, the act of congress that offered five years of full pay instead of the previously promised lifetime half pay for army officers."

"Before I conclude the subject of public justice, I can not omit to mention the obligations this country is under to that meritorious class of veteran non-commissioned officers and privates who have been discharged for inability, in consequence of the resolution of congress of the 23d April, 1782, on an annual pension for life. Their peculiar sufferings, their singular merits, and claims to that provision, need only be known, to interest all the feelings of humanity in their behalf. Nothing but a punctual payment of their annual allowance can rescue them from the most complicated misery, and nothing could be a more melancholy and distressing sight, than to behold those who have shed their blood or lost their limbs in the service of their country, without a shelter, without a friend, and without the means of obtaining any of the necessaries or comforts of life; compelled to beg their daily bread from door to door. Surfer me to recommend those of this description, belonging to your state, to the warmest patronage of your excellency and your legislature.

"Before I wrap up the topic of public justice, I can’t forget to mention the responsibilities this country has toward the deserving group of veteran non-commissioned officers and enlisted soldiers who have been discharged due to injury, as a result of Congress's resolution from April 23, 1782, about providing them with an annual pension for life. Their unique struggles, significant contributions, and rights to this support should evoke compassion from everyone. Only consistent payments of their annual pensions can lift them out of their complicated suffering, and nothing could be more heart-wrenching than seeing those who have risked their lives or lost limbs for our country left without shelter, without a friend, and without the means to secure basic necessities or comforts; forced to beg for their daily bread from house to house. Allow me to urge you to give strong support to those individuals from your state in need of this assistance."

"It is necessary to say but a few words on the third topic which was proposed, and which regards particularly the defence of the republic, as there can be little doubt but congress will recommend a proper peace establishment for the United States, in which a due attention will be paid to the importance of placing the militia of the union upon a regular and respectable footing. If this should be the case, I would beg leave to urge the great advantage of it in the strongest terms. The militia of this country must be considered as the palladium of our security, and the first effectual resort in case of hostility. It is essential, therefore, that the same system should pervade the whole; that the formation and discipline of the militia of the continent should be absolutely uniform, and that the same species of arms, accoutrements, and military apparatus should be introduced in every part of the United States. No one who has not learned it from experience, can conceive the difficulty, expense, and confusion, which result from a contrary system, or the vague arrangements which have hitherto prevailed.

"It’s important to say a few words about the third topic that was proposed, which specifically concerns the defense of the republic. There’s little doubt that Congress will recommend a proper peacetime military structure for the United States, with significant attention paid to establishing the militia on a solid and respectable basis. If this happens, I strongly urge you to recognize its great advantages. The militia of this country should be viewed as the cornerstone of our security and the primary line of defense in case of attack. Therefore, it’s essential that a consistent system is applied throughout; the organization and training of the continental militia should be completely uniform, and the same types of weapons, gear, and military supplies should be used across all parts of the United States. Anyone who hasn’t experienced it firsthand cannot imagine the difficulty, cost, and confusion that arise from a different system, or the vague arrangements that have existed until now."

"If in treating of political points, a greater latitude than usual has been taken in the course of this address, the importance of the crisis, and magnitude of the objects in discussion, must be my apology. It is, however, neither my wish nor expectation, that the preceding observations should claim any regard, except so far as they shall appear to be dictated by a good intention, consonant to the immediate rules of justice, calculated to produce a liberal system of policy, and founded on whatever experience may have been acquired by a long and close attention to public business. Here I might speak with the more confidence, from my actual observations; and, if it would not swell this letter (already too prolix) beyond the bounds I had prescribed myself, I could demonstrate to every mind open to conviction, that in less time, and with much less expense than has been incurred, the war might have been brought to the same happy conclusion, if the resources of the continent could have been properly drawn forth; that the distresses and disappointments which have very often occurred, have, in too many instances, resulted more from a want of energy in the continental government, than a deficiency of means in the particular states: that the inefficacy of measures, arising from the want of an adequate authority in the supreme power, from a partial compliance with the requisitions of congress in some of the states, and from a failure of punctuality in others, while it tended to damp the zeal of those which were more willing to exert themselves, served also to accumulate the expenses of the war, and to frustrate the best concerted plans; and that the discouragement occasioned by the complicated difficulties and embarrassments in which our affairs were by this means involved, would have long ago produced the dissolution of any army less patient, less virtuous, and less persevering, than that which I have had the honour to command. But while I mention these things which are notorious facts, as the defects of our federal constitution, particularly in the prosecution of a war, I beg it may be understood, that as I have ever taken a pleasure in gratefully acknowledging the assistance and support I have derived from every class of citizens, so shall I always be happy to do justice to the unparalleled exertions of the individual states, on many interesting occasions.

"If I have addressed political issues with more openness than usual in this speech, it’s because of the seriousness of the situation and the significance of the topics at hand. I don’t expect the previous comments to be taken seriously, except where they seem to come from a genuine intent, aligned with the basic principles of justice, aimed at creating an open-minded policy, and based on the experience gained from closely observing public matters for a long time. I could speak with more assurance based on my actual observations; and, if it wouldn’t make this letter (which is already too lengthy) too unwieldy, I could show anyone willing to be convinced that the war could have reached the same successful outcome in a shorter time and at a much lower cost, if the continent’s resources had been effectively mobilized. The hardships and setbacks we’ve frequently faced often stemmed more from a lack of energy in the continental government than from insufficient resources in the individual states. The ineffectiveness of our actions, caused by inadequate authority in the central government, partial compliance with Congress’s requests by some states, and punctuality failures by others, not only dampened the enthusiasm of those willing to do their part but also added to the war’s costs and undermined well-laid plans. The frustrations caused by the tangled difficulties in which our affairs were ensnared would have led to the breakdown of any army less patient, virtuous, and persistent than the one I’ve had the honor to lead. While I highlight these widely recognized issues as flaws in our federal constitution, especially concerning wartime efforts, I want it to be clear that I have always taken pleasure in acknowledging the help and support I’ve received from every group of citizens, and I will continue to give credit to the remarkable efforts of the individual states on many significant occasions."

"I have thus freely disclosed what I wished to make known before I surrendered up my public trust to those who committed it to me. The task is now accomplished. I now bid adieu to your excellency as the chief magistrate of your state; at the same time I bid a last farewell to the cares of office and all the employments of public life.

"I have openly shared what I wanted to communicate before I handed over my public trust to those who assigned it to me. The task is now complete. I now say goodbye to your excellency as the chief magistrate of your state; at the same time, I say a final farewell to the responsibilities of office and all the duties of public life."

"It remains then to be my final and only request, that your excellency will communicate these sentiments to your legislature at their next meeting; and that they may be considered as the legacy of one who has ardently wished, on all occasions, to be useful to his country; and who, even in the shade of retirement, will not fail to implore the divine benediction upon it.

"It is now my last and only request that you, your excellency, share these thoughts with your legislature at their next meeting; and that they may be viewed as the legacy of someone who has always wanted to be of service to his country; and who, even in the quiet of retirement, will continue to seek divine blessings for it."

"I now make it my earnest prayer that God would have you, and the state over which you preside, in his holy protection, that he would incline the hearts of the citizens to cultivate a spirit of subordination and obedience to government; to entertain a brotherly affection and love for one another, for their fellow citizens of the United States at large, and particularly for their brethren who have served in the field, and finally, that he would most graciously be pleased to dispose us all to do justice, to love mercy, and to demean ourselves with that charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind, which were the characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion; without an humble imitation of whose example in these things we can never hope to be a happy nation."

"I now earnestly pray that God keeps you and the state you lead under His holy protection, that He inspires the citizens to embrace a spirit of respect and obedience to the government; to foster brotherly love and care for one another, for their fellow citizens across the United States, and especially for those who have served in the field. Finally, I pray that He graciously guides us all to pursue justice, to love mercy, and to conduct ourselves with charity, humility, and a peaceful mindset, which were the qualities of the Divine Author of our blessed religion. Without humbly following His example in these matters, we can never expect to be a happy nation."

The impression made by this solemn and affecting admonition could not be surpassed. The circumstances under which it was given, added to the veneration with which it was received; and, like the counsel of a parent on whom the grave is about to close forever, it sunk deep into the hearts of all. But, like the counsels of a parent withdrawn from view, the advice was too soon forgotten, and the impression it had made was too soon effaced.

The impact of this serious and moving warning was unmatched. The situation in which it was delivered, along with the respect it received, made it resonate deeply; it affected everyone like a parent’s advice when faced with imminent loss. However, just like a parent’s guidance that fades from sight, the message was quickly forgotten, and its impact faded away too soon.

The recommendations of congress did not receive that prompt consideration which the public exigence demanded, nor did they meet that universal assent which was necessary to give them effect.

The recommendations from Congress didn’t get the quick attention that the public urgency required, nor did they get the widespread approval needed to make them effective.

Not immediately perceiving that the error lay in a system which was unfit for use, the distinguished patriots of the revolution contemplated with increasing anxiety, the anti-American temper which displayed itself in almost every part of the union. The letters addressed to the late Commander-in-chief, by many of those who had borne a conspicuous part in the arduous struggle for independence, manifest the disappointment and chagrin occasioned by this temper. The venerable Trumbull, who had rendered great service to the cause of united America; who, like Washington, had supported the burden of office throughout a hazardous contest, and like Washington, had determined to withdraw from the cares of a public station when that contest should be terminated, in a letter communicating to his friend and compatriot the resolution he had taken, thus disclosed the fears which the dispositions manifested by many of his countrymen inspired. "The fruits of our peace and independence do not at present wear so promising an appearance as I had fondly painted to my mind. The prejudices, the jealousies, and turbulence of the people, at times, almost stagger my confidence in our political establishments; and almost occasion me to think that they will show themselves unworthy of the noble prize for which we have contended, and which, I had pleased myself with the hope, we were so near enjoying. But again, I check this rising impatience, and console myself under the present prospect with the consideration, that the same beneficent and wise Providence which has done so much for this country, will not eventually leave us to ruin our own happiness, to become the sport of chance, or the scoff of a once admiring world; but that great things are yet in store for this people, which time, and the wisdom of the Great Director will produce in its best season."

Not immediately realizing that the problem was a system that was unfit for use, the notable patriots of the revolution increasingly worried about the anti-American sentiment that was showing up across the entire country. The letters sent to the former Commander-in-chief by many of those who had played significant roles in the tough struggle for independence revealed their disappointment and frustration with this sentiment. The respected Trumbull, who had greatly served the cause of a united America, and who, like Washington, had taken on the responsibilities of office throughout a risky battle, and like Washington, had decided to step away from public duties once that battle was over, in a letter to his friend and fellow patriot about his decision, expressed the fears that the attitudes of many of his fellow countrymen inspired in him. "The results of our peace and independence don’t look as promising right now as I had hoped they would. The prejudices, jealousies, and unrest of the people sometimes nearly shake my confidence in our political systems; they make me think that they might prove themselves unworthy of the great prize for which we have fought, and which I was hopeful we were so close to enjoying. But again, I try to rein in this rising impatience and comfort myself with the thought that the same kind and wise Providence that has done so much for this country will not ultimately allow us to ruin our own happiness, become victims of chance, or the mockery of a once-admiring world; but that great things are still in store for this people, which time and the wisdom of the Great Director will bring about in its best season."

"It is indeed a pleasure," said General Washington in reply, "from the walks of private life to view in retrospect the difficulties through which we have waded, and the happy haven into which our ship has been brought. Is it possible after this that it should founder? will not the all wise and all powerful Director of human events preserve it? I think he will. He may, however, for some wise purpose of his own, suffer our indiscretions and folly to place our national character low in the political scale;—and this, unless more wisdom and less prejudice take the lead in our government, will most certainly happen."

"It’s truly a pleasure," General Washington replied, "to look back from private life at the challenges we've overcome and the safe harbor we've reached. Is it possible that we could sink after this? Won't the all-wise and all-powerful Director of human events protect it? I believe he will. However, he might, for some wise purpose of his own, allow our mistakes and foolishness to lower our national character in the political arena;—and unless we have more wisdom and less bias in our government, this will definitely happen."

That the imbecility of the federal government, the impotence of its requisitions, and the inattention of some of the states to its recommendations, would, in the estimation of the world, abase the American character, could scarcely be termed a prediction. That course of national degradation had already commenced.

That the foolishness of the federal government, the powerlessness of its requests, and the disregard of some states for its recommendations would, in the eyes of the world, lower the American reputation could hardly be called a prediction. That path of national decline had already begun.

As the system recommended to the states on the 18th of April, 1783, had been matured by the best wisdom in the federal councils, a compliance with it was the last hope of the government; and congress continued to urge its adoption on the several states. While its fate remain undecided, requisitions for the intermediate supply of the national demands were annually repeated, and were annually neglected. Happily, a loan had been negotiated in Holland by Mr. Adams, after the termination of the war, out of which the interest of the foreign debt had been partly paid; but that fund was exhausted, and the United States possessed no means of replacing it. Unable to pay the interest, they would, in the course of the succeeding year, be liable for the first instalment of the principal; and the humiliating circumstance was to be encountered of a total failure to comply with the most solemn engagements, unaccompanied with the prospect of being enabled to give assurances, that, at any future time, their situation would be more eligible. If the condition of the domestic creditors was not absolutely desperate, the prospect of obtaining satisfaction for their claims was so distant and uncertain, that their evidences of debt were transferred at an eighth, and even at a tenth of their nominal value. The distress consequent on this depreciation was great and afflicting. "The requisitions of congress for eight years past," say the committee in February, 1786, to whom the subject of the revenue had been referred, "have been so irregular in their operation, so uncertain in their collection, and so evidently unproductive, that a reliance on them in future as a source from whence moneys are to be drawn to discharge the engagements of the confederacy, definite as they are in time and amount, would be not less dishonourable to the understandings of those who entertain such confidence, than it would be dangerous to the welfare and peace of the union." Under public embarrassments which were daily increasing, it had become, it was said, "the duty of congress to declare most explicitly that the crisis had arrived, when the people of the United States, by whose will, and for whose benefit, the federal government was instituted, must decide whether they will support their rank as a nation, by maintaining the public faith at home and abroad, or whether, for want of a timely exertion in establishing a general revenue, and thereby giving strength to the confederacy, they will hazard not only the existence of the union, but of those great and invaluable privileges for which they have so arduously and so honourably contended."

As the system proposed to the states on April 18, 1783, was developed by the most knowledgeable minds in the federal councils, following it was the government's last hope; Congress kept pressing the various states to adopt it. While its fate remained uncertain, requests for funding to meet national needs were made annually but were ignored every year. Fortunately, Mr. Adams had secured a loan in Holland after the war ended, which helped pay part of the interest on the foreign debt; however, that money was gone, and the United States had no way to replace it. Unable to pay the interest, they would soon be responsible for the first payment of the principal, and they faced the embarrassing situation of completely failing to meet their most serious commitments, with no promise of being in a better position in the future. While domestic creditors weren't in completely desperate circumstances, the likelihood of getting paid back for their claims was so slim and unpredictable that their debt claims were sold for as little as an eighth or even a tenth of their face value. The distress caused by this devaluation was significant and painful. "The requests from Congress over the past eight years," the committee said in February 1786, to whom the revenue issue was referred, "have been so inconsistent in their implementation, so unpredictable in their collection, and so obviously ineffective that relying on them in the future as a source for funds to meet the commitments of the confederacy, which are clearly defined in time and amount, would be just as dishonorable to those who have such confidence as it would be dangerous to the welfare and peace of the union." Amid increasing public pressures, it was asserted that "it is the duty of Congress to clearly declare that the moment has come when the people of the United States, by whose will and for whose benefit the federal government was established, must decide whether they will uphold their status as a nation by maintaining public trust at home and abroad, or whether, due to a lack of timely efforts to establish a general revenue and strengthen the confederacy, they will risk not only the existence of the union but also the great and invaluable rights for which they have fought so hard and honorably."

The revenue system of the 18th of April, 1783, was again solemnly recommended to the consideration of the several states, and their unanimous and early accession to it was declared to be the only measure which could enable congress to preserve the public faith, and to avoid the fatal evils which will inevitably flow from "a violation of those principles of justice which are the only solid basis of the honour and prosperity of nations."

The revenue system from April 18, 1783, was once again officially suggested for the attention of the various states, and it was stated that their unanimous and prompt agreement to it was the only way Congress could maintain public trust and avoid the serious consequences that would surely arise from "breaking those principles of justice that are the only solid foundation for the honor and prosperity of nations."

In framing this system, a revenue adequate to the funding of the whole national debt had been contemplated, and no part of it was to go into operation until the whole should be adopted. By suspending partial relief to the pressing necessities of the government, it was believed that complete relief would be the more certainly secured.

In creating this system, a revenue sufficient to cover the entire national debt was planned, and no part of it would start operating until everything was approved. By delaying partial relief for the urgent needs of the government, it was thought that total relief would be more reliably achieved.

The enlightened and virtuous statesmen with whom that measure originated, thought it impossible that their countrymen would be so unmindful of the obligations of honour and of justice, or could so mistake their real interests, as to withhold their assent from the entire plan, if convinced that no partial compliance with it would be received. In the progress of the business, however, there was reason to believe that the impost might be conceded, but that the application for internal taxes would encounter difficulties not to be surmounted. In the impoverished state of the federal treasury, an incompetent revenue was preferred to no revenue; and it was deemed more adviseable to accept a partial compliance with the recommendations of congress, than, by inflexibly adhering to the integrity of the system, to lose the whole. The states therefore, were requested to enable congress, "to carry into effect that part which related to impost so soon as it should be acceded to." In the course of the year 1786, every state in the union had acted upon the recommendation, and, with the exception of New York, had granted the impost duty which had been required. New York had passed an act upon the subject; but, influenced by its jealousy of the federal government, had not vested in congress the power of collection, but had reserved to itself the sole right of levying the duties according to its own laws. Neither did the act permit the collectors to be made accountable to congress. To the state only were they amenable. In addition to these deviations from the plan recommended, New York had emitted bills of credit, which were liable to depreciation, and in them the duties were payable. As the failure on the part of this single state, suspended the operation of the grants made by all the others, the executive thereof was requested again to convene the legislature, in order to lay the subject once more before them. To a similar resolution Governor Clinton had already replied, that "he had not power to convene the legislature before the time fixed by law for their stated meeting, except on extraordinary occasions, and as the present business proposed for their consideration had already been repeatedly laid before them, and so recently as at their last session had received their determination, it could not come within that description." This second resolution was not more successful than that which preceded it, and thus was finally defeated the laborious and persevering effort made by the federal government to obtain from the states the means of preserving, in whole or in part, the faith of the nation. General Washington's letters of that period abound with passages showing the solicitude with which he watched the progress of this recommendation, and the chagrin with which he viewed the obstacles to its adoption. In a letter of October, 1785, he said, "the war, as you have very justly observed, has terminated most advantageously for America, and a fair field is presented to our view; but I confess to you freely, my dear sir, that I do not think we possess wisdom or justice enough to cultivate it properly. Illiberality, jealousy, and local policy, mix too much in our public councils, for the good government of the union. In a word, the confederation appears to me to be little more than a shadow without the substance; and congress a nugatory body, their ordinances being little attended to. To me, it is a solecism in politics:—indeed it is one of the most extraordinary things in nature, that we should confederate as a nation, and yet be afraid to give the rulers of that nation, who are the creatures of our own making, appointed for a limited and short duration, and who are amenable for every action, recallable at any moment, and subject to all the evils which they may be instrumental in producing,—sufficient powers to order and direct the affairs of the same. By such policy as this, the wheels of government are clogged, and our brightest prospects, and that high expectation which was entertained of us by the wondering world, are turned into astonishment; and from the high ground on which we stood, we are descending into the vale of confusion and darkness.

The insightful and principled leaders who initiated that proposal believed it was unimaginable that their fellow citizens would be so oblivious to their commitments to honor and justice, or could misunderstand their actual interests, as to reject the entire plan if they were convinced that any partial agreement wouldn't be accepted. However, as things progressed, it became apparent that the import tax might be approved, but that the request for internal taxes would face insurmountable challenges. Given the dire state of the federal treasury, having some revenue was seen as better than having none at all; it was considered wiser to accept a partial agreement with Congress's recommendations rather than, by rigidly sticking to the full plan, risk losing everything. Therefore, the states were asked to empower Congress, "to implement that part related to the import tax as soon as it was agreed upon." Throughout 1786, every state in the union acted on this recommendation, and, with the exception of New York, had granted the requested import duty. New York had passed relevant legislation, but due to its suspicion of the federal government, it did not grant Congress the power to collect, instead reserving the right to impose the duties according to its own laws. The act also did not require collectors to report to Congress; they were only accountable to the state. Additionally, New York issued bills of credit that were prone to depreciation, in which the duties were payable. Since the failure of this one state halted the implementation of the grants made by all the others, its executive was asked to reconvene the legislature to reconsider the matter. In response to a similar request, Governor Clinton had already stated that "he didn’t have the power to convene the legislature before their scheduled meeting unless it was an extraordinary situation, and since this matter had been brought up multiple times and had recently been decided in their last session, it didn’t fit that description." This second request was just as unsuccessful as the first, ultimately thwarting the diligent and persistent efforts of the federal government to secure from the states the means to maintain, in whole or in part, the nation's integrity. General Washington's letters during that time are filled with expressions of concern as he monitored the progress of this recommendation and the frustration he felt at the hurdles to its acceptance. In an October 1785 letter, he wrote, "the war, as you have quite rightly pointed out, has ended very favorably for America, and we have a great opportunity ahead of us; but I must confess, my dear sir, that I don't think we have the wisdom or fairness to manage it properly. Narrow-mindedness, jealousy, and local interests influence our public decisions too much for the good governance of the union. In short, the confederation seems to me to be little more than a shadow without substance; and Congress a powerless entity, their decisions largely ignored. To me, it is a contradiction in politics:—it is indeed one of the most astonishing things that we should unite as a nation, yet be afraid to grant powers to the leaders of that nation, who are our own creations, appointed for a limited time, accountable for their actions, recallable at any moment, and subject to the consequences of their decisions,—sufficient authority to manage the affairs of the nation. Such a policy only hinders government, and our greatest hopes, and the high expectations that the world held for us, are turned into disbelief; and from the elevated position we once held, we are descending into confusion and darkness.

"That we have it in our power to become one of the most respectable nations upon earth, admits, in my humble opinion, of no doubt, if we would but pursue a wise, just, and liberal policy towards one another, and would keep good faith with the rest of the world:—that our resources are ample and increasing, none can deny; but while they are grudgingly applied, or not applied at all, we give a vital stab to public faith, and will sink in the eyes of Europe, into contempt."

"There's no doubt in my mind that we have the ability to become one of the most respected nations on earth, as long as we commit to a wise, fair, and open-minded approach towards each other and maintain good relationships with the rest of the world. It's undeniable that our resources are plentiful and growing, but if we hold back or don't use them at all, we seriously undermine public trust and risk being viewed with disdain in Europe."


CHAPTER IV.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams appointed minister to Great Britain.... Discontents excited by the commercial regulations of Britain.... Parties in the United States.... The convention at Annapolis.... Virginia appoints deputies to a convention at Philadelphia.... General Washington chosen one of them.... Insurrection at Massachusetts.... Convention at Philadelphia.... A form of government submitted to the respective states, as ratified by eleven of them.... Correspondence of General Washington respecting the chief magistracy.... He is elected president.... Meeting of the first congress.

Differences between Great Britain and the United States.... Mr. Adams was appointed as minister to Great Britain.... Discontent was stirred by Britain's commercial regulations.... Political parties in the United States.... The convention in Annapolis.... Virginia appointed delegates to a convention in Philadelphia.... General Washington was chosen as one of them.... Rebellion in Massachusetts.... Convention in Philadelphia.... A proposed form of government was submitted to the states, which was ratified by eleven of them.... Correspondence from General Washington regarding the presidency.... He was elected president.... The first Congress meets.

 

1783 to 1787

While the friends of the national government were making these unavailing efforts to invest it with a revenue which might enable it to preserve the national faith, many causes concurred to prepare the public mind for some great and radical change in the political system of America.

While the supporters of the national government were making these ineffective attempts to provide it with an income that could help maintain the national trust, various factors came together to set the public mindset towards a significant and fundamental shift in America’s political system.

Misunderstandings between Great Britain and the United States.

Scarcely had the war of the revolution terminated, when the United States and Great Britain reciprocally charged each other with violations of the treaty of peace. On the construction of that part of the seventh article which stipulates against the "destruction or carrying away of any negroes, or other property of the American inhabitants," a serious difference of opinion prevailed which could not be easily accommodated. As men seldom allow much weight to the reasoning of an adversary, the construction put upon that article by the cabinet of London was generally treated in America as a mere evasion; and the removal of the negroes who had joined the British army on the faith of a proclamation offering them freedom, was considered as a flagrant breach of faith. In addition to this circumstance, the troops of his Britannic Majesty still retained possession of the posts on the American side of the great lakes. As those posts gave their possessors a decided influence over the warlike tribes of Indians in their neighbourhood, this was a subject to which the United States were peculiarly sensible.

Scarcely had the Revolutionary War ended when the United States and Great Britain each accused the other of breaking the peace treaty. There was a major disagreement over how to interpret that part of the seventh article, which prohibits the "destruction or carrying away of any negroes, or other property of the American inhabitants," and this disagreement was not easily resolved. People rarely give much thought to the reasoning of their opponents, and the interpretation made by the British government was generally seen in America as just an excuse. The removal of the enslaved people who had joined the British army believing in a promise of freedom was viewed as a serious betrayal. Furthermore, British troops still held the military posts on the American side of the Great Lakes. Since those posts allowed them to exert significant influence over nearby Native American tribes, this was a matter that the United States felt particularly strongly about.

On the other hand, the United States were charged with infringing the fourth, fifth, and sixth articles, which contain agreements respecting the payment of debts, the confiscation of property, and prosecution of individuals for the part taken by them during the war.

On the other hand, the United States were accused of violating the fourth, fifth, and sixth articles, which include agreements about paying debts, seizing property, and prosecuting individuals for their actions during the war.

On the 14th of January, 1784, the day on which the definitive articles were ratified, congress passed a resolution containing a recommendation in the words of the treaty, respecting confiscated property, which was transmitted without delay to the several states. They considered this resolution as merely formal; and contended that neither the American nor the British government expected from it any beneficial results. But other stipulations which are explicit, the performance of which was not to rest on the recommendation of the government, especially that respecting the payment of debts, were also neglected. These causes of mutual complaint being permitted to rankle for some time in the bosoms of both nations, produced a considerable degree of irritation. The British merchants had large credits in America. Those engaged in the colonial trade had been nearly ruined by the rupture between the two countries; and, without taking into the account the embarrassments in which the war had involved their debtors, they calculated, after the restoration of peace, on the prompt collection of the vast sums which were due to them. But the impediments to the recovery of debts were, in many instances, permitted to remain; and the dispositions manifested by those states in which they were chiefly due, did not authorize a belief that any favourable change of measures was about to take place. The complaints of the creditors were loud and incessant. They openly charged the American government with violating the most solemn obligations which public and private contract could create; and this charge affected the national character the more seriously, because the terms of the treaty were universally deemed highly advantageous to the United States. The recriminations on the part of individuals in America, were also uttered with the angry vehemence of men who believe themselves to be suffering unprovoked injuries. The negroes in possession of the British armies at the restoration of peace, belonged, in many cases, to actual debtors; and in all, to persons who required the labour of which they were thus deprived, to repair the multiplied losses produced by the war. To the detention of the posts on the lakes was ascribed the hostile temper manifested by the Indians; and thus, to the indignity of permitting a foreign power to maintain garrisons within the limits of the nation, were superadded the murders perpetrated by the savages, and the consequent difficulty of settling the fertile and vacant lands of the west.[28] On the north-eastern frontier too, the British were charged with making encroachments on the territory of the United States. On that side, the river St. Croix, from its source to its mouth in the bay of Passamaquoddy, is the boundary between the two nations. Three rivers of that name empty into the bay. The Americans claimed the most eastern, as the real St. Croix, while settlements were actually made under the authority of the government of Nova Scotia to the middle river, and the town of St. Andrews was established on its banks.

On January 14, 1784, the day the final articles were ratified, Congress passed a resolution that included a recommendation based on the treaty regarding confiscated property, which was quickly sent to the various states. They saw this resolution as just a formality and argued that neither the American nor British government expected any real benefits from it. However, other specific agreements that were meant to be enforced without relying on government recommendations, particularly regarding debt payments, were also ignored. These unresolved issues caused growing resentment between the two nations. British merchants had significant credits in America, and those involved in colonial trade had nearly been destroyed by the conflict between the countries; they anticipated prompt collection of the substantial amounts owed to them once peace was restored, not considering the complications the war had created for their debtors. The obstacles to recovering these debts often remained unaddressed, and the attitudes shown by the states where these debts were mainly owed didn't inspire confidence that any positive changes in policy were forthcoming. Creditors voiced their complaints loudly and constantly, openly accusing the American government of violating the most serious obligations of both public and private contracts. This accusation had a serious impact on the national reputation, especially since the terms of the treaty were viewed as very favorable for the United States. Individuals in America also voiced their grievances with the fierce anger of people who felt they were suffering unjustly. The enslaved individuals held by the British forces at the end of the war often belonged to actual debtors or to people who relied on their labor to recover from the numerous losses caused by the conflict. The retention of posts on the lakes was blamed for the hostility shown by the Indigenous peoples, adding to the indignity of allowing a foreign power to maintain military bases within the nation's borders, along with the violence committed by the Native Americans and the resulting challenges of settling the fertile and unclaimed lands to the west.[28] On the northeastern border, the British were also accused of encroaching on U.S. territory. On that side, the St. Croix River, from its source to its mouth in the bay of Passamaquoddy, serves as the boundary between the two nations. Three rivers share the name St. Croix and flow into the bay. The Americans claimed the easternmost river as the true St. Croix, while settlements were actually established under the authority of the Nova Scotia government on the middle river, and the town of St. Andrews was built along its banks.

Mr. Adams appointed to negotiate with the British cabinet.

But the cause of most extensive disquiet was the rigorous commercial system pursued by Great Britain. While colonists, the Americans had carried on a free and gainful trade with the British West Indies. Those ports were closed against them as citizens of an independent state; and their accustomed intercourse with other parts of the empire also was interrupted by the navigation act. To explore new channels for the commerce of the nation was, in the actual state of things, opposed by obstacles which almost discouraged the attempt. On every side they met with rigorous and unlooked for restrictions. Their trade with the colonies of other powers, as well as with those of England, was prohibited; and in all the ports of Europe they encountered regulations which were extremely embarrassing. From the Mediterranean, they were excluded by the Barbary powers, whose hostility they had no force to subdue, and whose friendship they had no money to purchase. Thus, the characteristic enterprise of their merchants, which, in better times, has displayed their flag in every ocean, was then in a great measure restrained from exerting itself by the scantiness of their means. These commercial difficulties suggested the idea of compelling Great Britain to relax the rigour of her system, by opposing it with regulations equally restrictive; but to render success in such a conflict possible, it was necessary that the whole power of regulating commerce should reside in a single legislature. Few were so sanguine as to hope that thirteen independent governments, jealous of each other, could be induced to concur for a length of time, in measures capable of producing the desired effect. With many, therefore, the desire of counteracting a system which appeared to them so injurious, triumphed over their attachment to state sovereignty; and the converts to the opinion that congress ought to be empowered to regulate trade, were daily multiplied. Meanwhile, the United States were unremitting in their endeavours to form commercial treaties in Europe. Three commissioners had been appointed for that purpose; and at length, as the trade with England was peculiarly important, and the growing misunderstandings between the two countries threatened serious consequences should their adjustment be much longer delayed, Mr. John Adams was appointed minister plenipotentiary to the court of St. James. His endeavours to form a commercial treaty were not successful. His overtures were declined by the cabinet of London, because the government of the United States was unable to secure the observance of any general commercial regulations; and it was deemed unwise to enter into stipulations which could not be of reciprocal obligation. In fact, it is not probable that, had even this difficulty been surmounted, Britain could have been induced to grant advantages that would have been satisfactory to America. The latter expected great relaxations of the navigation act, and a free admission into the colonies of the former; and believed its commerce of sufficient importance to obtain these objects, if it could be regulated by a single legislature. The reflecting part of America did not require this additional evidence of the sacrifice which had been made of national interest on the altars of state jealousy, to demonstrate the defectiveness of the existing system. On the mind of no person had this impression been more strongly made, than on that of General Washington. His extensive correspondence bears ample testimony to the solicitude with which he contemplated the proceedings of the states on this interesting subject.

But what really caused widespread concern was the strict commercial system enforced by Great Britain. While they were still colonists, Americans had enjoyed a free and profitable trade with the British West Indies. Those ports were now closed to them as citizens of an independent state, and their usual trade with other parts of the empire was also disrupted by the navigation act. Finding new avenues for national commerce faced nearly insurmountable challenges that made the effort feel almost futile. They encountered strict and unexpected restrictions everywhere. Trade with colonies of other nations, as well as with Britain’s, was forbidden; and they faced regulations in European ports that were extremely cumbersome. In the Mediterranean, they were shut out by the Barbary powers, whose hostility they had no strength to overcome and whose friendship they could not afford to buy. Consequently, the adventurous spirit of their merchants, which had previously waved their flag across all oceans, was significantly limited by their lack of resources. These commercial challenges led to the idea of forcing Great Britain to ease its stringent policies by countering them with equally strict regulations; however, for this to work, it was essential that the power to regulate commerce be held by a single governing body. Few believed that thirteen independent governments, each suspicious of the others, could be persuaded to unite for a long time in actions that would achieve the necessary effect. For many, the desire to push back against a system they saw as harmful outweighed their loyalty to state sovereignty; and more people began to believe that Congress should be given the authority to regulate trade. Meanwhile, the United States were constantly working to establish commercial treaties in Europe. Three commissioners had been appointed for this task, and eventually, since trade with England was particularly critical and the growing tensions between the two nations posed serious risks the longer they went unresolved, Mr. John Adams was appointed as minister plenipotentiary to the court of St. James. However, his efforts to form a commercial treaty were unsuccessful. London’s cabinet rejected his proposals because the United States government could not ensure adherence to any general commercial rules, and it was seen as unwise to make agreements that couldn't be mutually binding. In fact, even if this hurdle had been overcome, it’s unlikely Britain would have granted concessions that would satisfy America. The latter expected significant relaxations of the navigation act and free access to its colonies, believing its trade was crucial enough to achieve those goals if it could be managed under a single legislature. The more thoughtful individuals in America didn’t need further proof of the sacrifices made to national interests at the altar of state jealousy to see the flaws in the current system. No one felt this impact more strongly than General Washington. His extensive correspondence provides plenty of evidence of his deep concern regarding how the states were handling this important issue.

The opinion he sought to inculcate was, that the trade between the United States and Great Britain was equally important to each; and therefore, that a commercial intercourse between the two nations might be established on equal terms, if the political arrangements in America would enable its government to guard its interests; but without such arrangements, those interests could not be protected, and America must appear in a very contemptible point of view to those with whom she was endeavouring to form commercial treaties, without possessing the means of carrying them into effect:—who "must see and feel that the union, or the states individually are sovereign as best suits their purposes:—in a word, that we are one nation to day, and thirteen to-morrow. Who," he added, "will treat with us on such terms?"

The idea he was trying to get across was that the trade between the United States and Great Britain was equally vital for both. Therefore, a trade relationship between the two countries could be set up on equal footing if the political situation in America allowed its government to protect its interests. But without those arrangements, those interests couldn't be safeguarded, and America would look quite insignificant to those with whom it was trying to negotiate trade agreements, especially since it lacked the means to implement them. They would "have to see and understand that either the union or the individual states are sovereign, depending on what suits their needs: in short, that we are one nation today and thirteen tomorrow. Who," he continued, "will negotiate with us under such conditions?"

About this time, General Washington received a long and affectionate letter from the Marquis de Lafayette, who had just returned from a tour through the north of Europe. In communicating the occurrences at the courts he had visited, and especially at that of Prussia, whose aged and distinguished monarch, uniting the acquirements of the scholar and the statesman with the most profound skill in the art of war, could confer either literary or military fame, he dwelt with enthusiasm on the plaudits which were universally bestowed on his military patron and paternal friend. "I wish," he added, "the other sentiments I have had occasion to discover with respect to America, were equally satisfactory with those that are personal to yourself. I need not say that the spirit, the firmness, with which the revolution was conducted, has excited universal admiration:—That every friend to the rights of mankind is an enthusiast for the principles on which those constitutions are built:—but I have often had the mortification to hear, that the want of powers in congress, of union between the states, of energy in their government, would make the confederation very insignificant. By their conduct in the revolution," he added, "the citizens of America have commanded the respect of the world; but it grieves me to think they will in a measure lose it, unless they strengthen the confederation, give congress power to regulate their trade, pay off their debt, or at least the interest of it, establish a well regulated militia, and, in a word, complete all those measures which you have recommended to them."

About this time, General Washington received a long and heartfelt letter from the Marquis de Lafayette, who had just returned from a tour through northern Europe. In sharing what he experienced at the courts he visited, especially in Prussia, where the elderly and distinguished king combined the knowledge of a scholar and the expertise of a statesman with a deep understanding of warfare, he passionately talked about the praise that was universally given to his military mentor and fatherly friend. "I wish," he added, "that the other opinions I've come across regarding America were as positive as those about you. I don't need to mention that the spirit and determination with which the revolution was carried out have inspired worldwide admiration: Every advocate for human rights is a supporter of the principles upon which those constitutions are founded: but I've often been disappointed to hear that the lack of power in congress, the disunity between the states, and the weakness of their government would make the confederation quite insignificant. Through their actions during the revolution," he continued, "the people of America have earned the respect of the world; but it saddens me to think they will partially lose it unless they strengthen the confederation, empower congress to regulate trade, pay off their debt, or at least the interest on it, establish a well-regulated militia, and, in short, complete all the measures you have suggested to them."

"Unhappily for us," said the general in reply, "though the reports you mention are greatly exaggerated, our conduct has laid the foundation for them. It is one of the evils of democratic governments, that the people, not always seeing, and frequently misled, must often feel before they act right. But evils of this nature seldom fail to work their own cure. It is to be lamented, nevertheless, that the remedies are so slow, and that those who wish to apply them seasonably, are not attended to before they suffer in person, in interest, and in reputation. I am not without hopes that matters will soon take a favourable turn in the federal constitution. The discerning part of the community have long since seen the necessity of giving adequate powers to congress for national purposes, and those of a different description must yield to it ere long."

"Unfortunately for us," the general responded, "even though the reports you mentioned are greatly exaggerated, our actions have set the stage for them. One of the downsides of democratic governments is that the people, who don't always see clearly and are often misled, must often feel things out before they act correctly. However, problems like this usually find their own solutions. It’s unfortunate, though, that the fixes take so long, and those who want to implement them in a timely manner are often ignored until they face personal, financial, and reputational losses. I still hold out hope that things will soon improve within the federal constitution. The more perceptive members of the community have long recognized the need to give Congress sufficient powers for national purposes, and those with different views will have to come around to this eventually."

Discontents of the Americans against the commercial regulations of Britain.

While the recommendation of the 30th of April, 1784, was before the states, many causes contributed to diffuse through the community such a general dissatisfaction with the existing state of things, as to prepare the way for some essential change in the American system. In the course of the long war which had been carried on in the bosom of their country, the people of the United States had been greatly impoverished. Their property had been seized for the support of both armies; and much of their labour had been drawn from agriculture for the performance of military service. The naval power of their enemy had almost annihilated their commerce; from which resulted the two-fold calamity, that imported commodities were enhanced to an enormous price, while those for exportation were reduced much below their ordinary value. The inevitable consequence was, that those consumable articles which habit had rendered necessary, were exhausted; and peace found the American people, not only destitute of the elegancies, and even of the conveniences of life, but also without the means of procuring them, otherwise than by anticipating the proceeds of future industry. On opening their ports, an immense quantity of foreign merchandise was introduced into the country, and they were tempted by the sudden cheapness of imported goods, and by their own wants, to purchase beyond their capacities for payment. Into this indiscretion, they were in some measure beguiled by their own sanguine calculations on the value which a free trade would bestow on the produce of their soil, and by a reliance on those evidences of the public debt which were in the hands of most of them. So extravagantly too did many estimate the temptation which equal liberty and vacant lands would hold out to emigrants from the old world, as to entertain the opinion that Europe was about to empty itself into America, and that the United States would derive from that source such an increase of population, as would enhance their lands to a price heretofore not even conjectured. Co-operating with the cause last mentioned, was the impression which had been made by paper money on public morals, and on public opinion. It had not escaped observation that every purchaser on credit, however excessive the price might apparently be, had not only been relieved by the depreciation, but had derived great gains from his contract. Speculating on a similar course of things, many individuals had made extensive purchases at high prices; and had thus contributed to continue for a time, the deception imposed on themselves by those who supposed that the revolution was a talisman, whose magic powers were capable of changing the nature of things. The delusive hopes created by these visionary calculations were soon dissipated, and a great proportion of the inhabitants found themselves involved in debts they were unable to discharge. One of the consequences resulting from this unprosperous state of things was a general discontent with the course of trade. It had commenced with the native merchants of the north, who found themselves incapable of contending in their own ports with foreigners; and was soon communicated to others. The gazettes of Boston contained some very animated and angry addresses, which produced resolutions for the government of the citizens of that town, applications to their state legislature, a petition to congress, and a circular letter to the merchants of the several sea-ports throughout the United States. After detailing the disadvantages under which the trade and navigation of America laboured, and expressing their confidence that the necessary powers to the federal government would be soon, if not already, delegated, the petition to congress thus concludes: "Impressed with these ideas, your petitioners beg leave to request of the very august body which they have now the honour to address, that the numerous impositions of the British, on the trade and exports of these states, may be forthwith contravened by similar expedients on our part: else may it please your excellency and honours, the commerce of this country, and of consequence its wealth, and perhaps the union itself, may become victims to the artifice of a nation whose arms have been in vain exerted to accomplish the ruin of America."

While the recommendation from April 30, 1784, was being considered by the states, various factors contributed to a widespread dissatisfaction within the community, setting the stage for a significant change in the American system. Throughout the long war that had ravaged their country, the people of the United States had become significantly impoverished. Their property had been seized to support both armies, and much of their labor had been diverted from agriculture to military service. The enemy's naval power had nearly destroyed their commerce, leading to the dual problem that imported goods were sky-high in price while export goods were valued much less than usual. As a result, the everyday items that people had come to rely on were depleted, leaving the American population not only lacking the luxuries and even the necessities of life but also without the means to obtain them except by relying on future earnings. When they opened their ports, a huge amount of foreign merchandise flooded the country. The sudden affordability of imported goods and their immediate needs tempted them to spend beyond their means. Many were misled by their optimistic predictions about the value that free trade would bring to their agricultural products and their reliance on the public debt instruments that most of them held. Many also overestimated the appeal that equal freedom and open land would have on emigrants from Europe, thinking that the continent would soon empty itself into America, significantly boosting U.S. population and driving up land prices to previously unimaginable heights. Alongside this misconception was the impact of paper money on public morals and opinion. It was noticeable that anyone buying on credit, no matter how high the price seemed, benefited from depreciation and made substantial profits from their deals. Speculating on a similar outcome, many individuals made large purchases at inflated prices, contributing to the ongoing illusion that the revolution was a magical force capable of changing reality. However, the unrealistic hopes fostered by these fanciful assumptions quickly faded, and many residents found themselves mired in debts they couldn't pay. One consequence of this unfortunate situation was widespread dissatisfaction with trade conditions. It began with native merchants in the north, who found themselves unable to compete with foreign traders in their own ports, and soon spread to others. The Boston newspapers published some passionate and angry statements leading to resolutions for the local government, appeals to their state legislature, a petition to Congress, and a circular letter to merchants in several coastal cities across the United States. After outlining the challenges faced by American trade and navigation and expressing confidence that the necessary powers would soon, if not already, be assigned to the federal government, the petition to Congress concluded: "With these thoughts in mind, your petitioners respectfully request that the distinguished body they are addressing take immediate action to counter the numerous British impositions on the trade and exports of these states with similar measures of our own; otherwise, your excellency and honors, the commerce of our country, and consequently its wealth, and perhaps even the union itself, may fall victim to the schemes of a nation that has unsuccessfully attempted to destroy America."

The merchants of the city of Philadelphia presented a memorial to the legislature of that state, in which, after lamenting it as a fundamental defect in the constitution that full and entire power over the commerce of the United States had not been originally vested in congress, "as no concern common to many could be conducted to a good end, but by a unity of councils;" they say, "hence it is that the intercourses of the states are liable to be perplexed and injured by various and discordant regulations, instead of that harmony of measures on which the particular, as well as general interests depend; productive of mutual disgusts, and alienation among the several members of the empire.

The merchants of Philadelphia submitted a petition to the state legislature, where they expressed concern that a major flaw in the constitution was the lack of full control over U.S. commerce being given to Congress. They argued that "no shared interest can be successfully managed without a unified decision-making body." They continued, "as a result, the interactions between states can be complicated and harmed by inconsistent and conflicting regulations, rather than the coordinated measures that are essential for both individual and collective interests, leading to mutual resentment and disconnection among different members of the nation."

"But the more certain inconveniences foreseen and now experimentally felt, flow from the unequal footing this circumstance puts us on with other nations, and by which we stand in a very singular and disadvantageous situation; for while the whole of our trade is laid open to these nations, they are at liberty to limit us to such branches of theirs as interest or policy may dictate:—unrestrained by any apprehensions, as long as the power remains severally with the states, of being met and opposed by any consistent and effectual restrictions on our part."

"But the more certain problems we expected and are now experiencing come from the unequal position this situation puts us in with other nations, which places us in a very unique and disadvantageous position. While all of our trade is open to these nations, they can limit us to whatever sectors of theirs they choose based on their interests or policies, without any worries as long as power remains divided among the states, that we might respond with any consistent and effective restrictions on our part."

This memorial prayed that the legislature would endeavour to procure from congress, a recommendation to the several states, to vest in that body the necessary powers over the commerce of the United States.

This memorial requested that the legislature would work to get a recommendation from Congress to the various states, granting that body the necessary powers over the commerce of the United States.

It was immediately taken into consideration, and resolutions were passed conforming to its prayer. Similar applications were made by other commercial towns.

It was quickly taken into account, and resolutions were passed in line with its request. Other commercial towns made similar requests.

From these proceedings, and from the general representations made by the American merchants, General Washington had augured the most happy effects.

From these discussions, and from the overall feedback provided by the American merchants, General Washington had predicted very positive outcomes.

In a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette, he thus expressed his hope of the consequences which would attend the efforts then making to enlarge the powers of congress. "However unimportant America may be considered at present, and however Britain may affect to despise her trade, there will assuredly come a day when this country will have some weight in the scale of empires."

In a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette, he expressed his hope for the outcomes of the efforts being made to expand the powers of Congress. "No matter how insignificant America may seem right now, and no matter how much Britain may pretend to look down on her trade, there will definitely come a day when this country will have some influence in the balance of empires."

But a concurrence of the states in granting to the general government the beneficial powers in question, was not so near being effected as was hoped by its friends. A resolution was moved in congress, recommending it to the several states to vest in that body full authority to regulate their commerce, both external and internal, and to impose such duties as might be necessary for that purpose. This power was to be fettered with several extraordinary limitations, which might render it more acceptable to the governments who were asked to bestow it, among which was a provision that the duties should be "collectible under the authority, and accrue to the use of the state in which the same should be made payable." Notwithstanding these restrictions, marking the keen sighted jealousy with which any diminution of state sovereignty was watched, this resolution encountered much opposition even in congress.

But getting the states to agree to give the federal government the powers in question wasn't happening as quickly as its supporters had hoped. A resolution was proposed in Congress urging the states to grant the federal government full authority to regulate their commerce, both international and domestic, and to impose any necessary duties for that purpose. This power was to come with several unusual limitations to make it more acceptable to the states being asked to provide it, including a provision that the duties should be "collectible under the authority, and accrue to the use of the state in which the same should be made payable." Despite these restrictions, which showed the strong concern about any reduction of state sovereignty, this resolution faced significant opposition even in Congress.

During these transactions, the public attention was called to another subject which served to impress still more powerfully on every reflecting mind, the necessity of enlarging the powers of the general government, were it only to give efficacy to those which in theory it already possessed.

During these transactions, public attention was drawn to another topic that further highlighted for every thoughtful person the need to expand the powers of the federal government, if only to make effective those powers it already had in theory.

The uneasiness occasioned by the infractions of the treaty of peace on the part of Great Britain, has been already noticed. To obtain its complete execution, constituted one of the objects for which Mr. Adams had been deputed to the court of St. James. A memorial presented by that minister in December, 1785, urging the complaints of America, and pressing for a full compliance with the treaty, was answered by an enumeration of the violations of that compact on the part of the United States. The Marquis of Carmarthen acknowledged explicitly the obligation created by the seventh article to withdraw the British garrisons from every post within the United States; but insisted that the obligation created by the fourth article, to remove every lawful impediment to the recovery of bona fide debts, was equally clear and explicit.

The discomfort caused by Great Britain's violations of the peace treaty has already been noted. Ensuring its full implementation was one of the goals for which Mr. Adams was sent to the court of St. James. A memo presented by that minister in December 1785, highlighting America's complaints and urging full compliance with the treaty, was met with a list of violations by the United States. The Marquis of Carmarthen explicitly acknowledged the duty created by the seventh article to withdraw British troops from every post within the United States; however, he argued that the duty created by the fourth article, to eliminate any legitimate obstacles to the recovery of bona fide debts, was just as clear and explicit.

"The engagements entered into by a treaty ought," he said, "to be mutual, and equally binding on the respective contracting parties. It would, therefore, be the height of folly as well as injustice, to suppose one party alone obliged to a strict observance of the public faith, while the other might remain free to deviate from its own engagements as often as convenience might render such deviation necessary, though at the expense of its own credit and importance."

"The commitments made by a treaty should," he said, "be mutual and equally binding on all parties involved. So, it would be incredibly foolish and unfair to think that only one side is required to strictly uphold the agreement, while the other side is free to ignore its own commitments whenever it suits them, even if it harms their own reputation and significance."

He concluded with the assurance, "that whenever America should manifest a real determination to fulfil her part of the treaty, Great Britain would not hesitate to prove her sincerity to co-operate in whatever points depended upon her, for carrying every article of it into real and complete effect."

He ended by assuring that whenever America showed a genuine commitment to uphold her part of the treaty, Great Britain would not hesitate to demonstrate her sincerity in cooperating on any aspects that depended on her, to fully implement every part of it.

This letter was accompanied by a statement of the infractions of the fourth article.

This letter was accompanied by a statement of the violations of the fourth article.

Copies of both documents were immediately transmitted by Mr. Adams to congress, by whom they were referred to Mr. Jay, the secretary for foreign affairs. The report of that upright minister did not, by contravening facts, affect to exculpate his country. "Some of the facts," said he in a letter to General Washington, written after permission to communicate the papers had been given, "are inaccurately stated and improperly coloured; but it is too true that the treaty has been violated. On such occasions, I think it better fairly to confess and correct errors, than attempt to deceive ourselves and others, by fallacious though plausible palliations and excuses.

Copies of both documents were quickly sent by Mr. Adams to Congress, which referred them to Mr. Jay, the secretary for foreign affairs. The report from that honest minister didn’t try to excuse his country by twisting the facts. "Some of the facts," he wrote in a letter to General Washington after he got permission to share the papers, "are inaccurately stated and improperly colored; but it is unfortunately true that the treaty has been violated. In situations like this, I believe it’s better to openly admit and correct mistakes rather than deceive ourselves and others with misleading but convincing justifications and excuses."

"To oppose popular prejudices, to censure the proceedings and expose the impropriety of states, is an unpleasant task, but it must be done."[29]

"Challenging popular biases, critiquing actions, and highlighting the wrongdoing of governments is a tough job, but it's necessary."[29]

That the United States might with reason be required to fulfil the treaty before they could entitle themselves to demand a strict performance of it on the part of Great Britain, was a position the propriety of which they were prevented from contesting by the miserably defective organization of the government. If their treaties were obligatory in theory, the inability of congress to enforce their execution had been demonstrated in practice. Restrained by this defect in the constitution from insisting that the evacuation of the western posts should precede the removal of the impediments to the bona fide execution of the treaty on the part of America, government exerted its earnest endeavours to prevail on the several states to repeal all existing laws which might be repugnant to that compact. The resolutions which were passed on that subject, and the circular letters which accompanied them to the several governors, contain arguments which ought to have demonstrated to all, the constitutional obligation of a treaty negotiated under the authority of congress, and the real policy, as well as the moral duty of faithfully executing that which had been formed with Great Britain. To the deep mortification of those who respected the character of the nation, these earnest representations did not produce the effect which was expected from them. "It was impolitic and unfortunate, if not unjust in these states," said General Washington to a member of congress by whom the objectionable conduct of America was first intimated to him, "to pass laws which by fair construction might be considered as infractions of the treaty of peace. It is good policy at all times to place one's adversary in the wrong. Had we observed good faith, and the western posts had been withheld from us by Great Britain, we might have appealed to God and man for justice."

That the United States could reasonably be expected to fulfill the treaty before being able to demand strict adherence to it from Great Britain was a position they couldn’t challenge due to the poorly structured government. While their treaties were theoretically binding, Congress's inability to enforce their execution had been proven in practice. Limited by this flaw in the constitution from insisting that the evacuation of the western posts should happen before the removal of obstacles to the genuine execution of the treaty by America, the government worked hard to persuade the states to repeal any laws that contradicted the agreement. The resolutions passed on this issue, along with the circular letters sent to the governors, contained arguments that should have shown everyone the constitutional obligation of a treaty negotiated under Congress's authority, as well as the real policy and moral duty to faithfully execute the agreement made with Great Britain. To the deep disappointment of those who cared about the country’s reputation, these earnest appeals did not have the intended effect. "It was unwise and unfortunate, if not unjust in these states," General Washington told a member of Congress who first brought the problematic behavior of America to his attention, "to pass laws that could reasonably be seen as violations of the peace treaty. It’s always good policy to make your opponent look bad. If we had shown good faith, and if Great Britain had withheld the western posts from us, we could have appealed to God and man for justice."

"What a misfortune it is," said he in reply to the secretary for foreign affairs, "that the British should have so well grounded a pretext for their palpable infractions, and what a disgraceful part, out of the choice of difficulties before us, are we to act!"

"What a misfortune it is," he replied to the secretary for foreign affairs, "that the British have such a solid excuse for their obvious violations, and what a disgraceful role are we to play, given the difficult choices ahead of us!"

Rise of parties in the United States.

The discontents arising from the embarrassments in which individuals were involved, continued to increase. At length, two great parties were formed in every state, which were distinctly marked, and which pursued distinct objects, with systematic arrangement.

The frustrations caused by the troubles individuals were facing kept growing. Eventually, two major parties emerged in every state, clearly defined and pursuing different goals in an organized manner.

The one struggled with unabated zeal for the exact observance of public and private engagements. By those belonging to it, the faith of a nation, or of a private man was deemed a sacred pledge, the violation of which was equally forbidden by the principles of moral justice, and of sound policy. The distresses of individuals were, they thought, to be alleviated only by industry and frugality, not by a relaxation of the laws, or by a sacrifice of the rights of others. They were consequently the uniform friends of a regular administration of justice, and of a vigorous course of taxation which would enable the state to comply with its engagements. By a natural association of ideas, they were also, with very few exceptions, in favour of enlarging the powers of the federal government, and of enabling it to protect the dignity and character of the nation abroad, and its interests at home.

The person fought tirelessly for strict adherence to both public and private commitments. For those involved, the trust of a nation or an individual was seen as a sacred promise, and breaking it was equally against the principles of moral justice and good policy. They believed that the suffering of individuals should only be eased through hard work and saving, not by loosening the laws or compromising the rights of others. Therefore, they were consistently supporters of a fair justice system and strong taxation that would allow the state to fulfill its commitments. Naturally, they were, with very few exceptions, in favor of expanding the powers of the federal government to safeguard the country's dignity and reputation internationally, as well as to protect its interests domestically.

The other party marked out for themselves a more indulgent course. Viewing with extreme tenderness the case of the debtor, their efforts were unceasingly directed to his relief. To exact a faithful compliance with contracts was, in their opinion, a harsh measure which the people would not bear. They were uniformly in favour of relaxing the administration of justice, of affording facilities for the payment of debts, or of suspending their collection, and of remitting taxes. The same course of opinion led them to resist every attempt to transfer from their own hands into those of congress, powers, which by others were deemed essential to the preservation of the union. In many of these states, the party last mentioned, constituted a decided majority of the people; and in all of them, it was very powerful. The emission of paper money, the delay of legal proceedings, and the suspension of the collection of taxes, were the fruits of their rule wherever they were completely predominant. Even where they failed to carry their measures, their strength was such as to encourage the hope of succeeding in a future attempt; and annual elections held forth to them the prospect of speedily repairing the loss of a favourite question. Throughout the union, the contest between these parties was periodically revived; and the public mind was perpetually agitated with hopes and fears on subjects which essentially affected the fortunes of a considerable proportion of the society.

The other party chose a more lenient approach for themselves. They viewed the debtor's situation with great compassion, and their efforts were constantly aimed at providing relief. They believed that enforcing strict adherence to contracts was a harsh action that the public wouldn't accept. They consistently supported easing the administration of justice, making it easier to pay debts or delaying their collection, and reducing taxes. This mindset led them to oppose any efforts to transfer their powers to Congress, which others considered vital for maintaining the union. In many of these states, this party held a significant majority among the people, and they were powerful everywhere. The issuance of paper money, delays in legal processes, and halting tax collections were the results of their dominance wherever they had full control. Even when they didn’t succeed in their initiatives, their influence gave them hope for future success, and annual elections offered them the chance to quickly regain support for their preferred issues. Across the union, the rivalry between these parties flared up regularly, and the public was constantly stirred by hopes and fears concerning matters that deeply impacted a large portion of society.

These contests were the more animated, because, in the state governments generally, no principle had been introduced which could resist the wild projects of the moment, give the people an opportunity to reflect, and allow the good sense of the nation time for exertion. This uncertainty with respect to measures of great importance to every member of the community, this instability in principles which ought, if possible, to be rendered immutable, produced a long train of ills; and is seriously believed to have been among the operating causes of those pecuniary embarrassments, which, at that time, were so general as to influence the legislation of almost every state in the union. Its direct consequence was the loss of confidence in the government, and in individuals. This, so far as respected the government, was peculiarly discernible in the value of state debts.

These contests were more lively because, in most state governments, there wasn’t any principle in place that could counteract the impulsive ideas of the moment, giving people a chance to think and allowing the common sense of the nation time to act. This uncertainty regarding decisions that were crucial for every member of the community, and this instability in principles that should, if possible, be made unchanging, led to a long series of problems. It is widely believed to have been one of the factors contributing to the financial troubles that were so widespread at the time, influencing the legislation of nearly every state in the union. The direct result was a loss of trust in the government and in individuals. This, particularly in relation to the government, was especially evident in the value of state debts.

The war having been conducted by nations in many respects independent of each other, the debts contracted in its prosecution were due, in part from the United States, and in part from the individual states who became immediately responsible to the creditors, retaining their claim against the government of the union for any balances which might appear to be due on a general settlement of accounts.

The war was fought by nations that were largely independent from one another, so the debts incurred during the conflict were owed partly by the United States and partly by the individual states. The states were directly responsible to the creditors, but they kept their right to claim from the federal government for any remaining balances that might come up during a final accounting.

That the debt of the United States should have greatly depreciated will excite no surprise, when it is recollected that the government of the union possessed no funds, and, without the assent of jealous and independent sovereigns, could acquire none, to pay the accruing interest: but the depreciation of the debt due from those states which made an annual and adequate provision for the interest, can be ascribed only to a want of confidence in governments which were controlled by no fixed principles; and it is therefore not entirely unworthy of attention. In many of those states which had repelled every attempt to introduce into circulation a depreciated medium of commerce, or to defeat the annual provision of funds for the payment of the interest, the debt sunk in value to ten, five, and even less than four shillings in the pound. However unexceptionable might be the conduct of the existing legislature, the hazard from those which were to follow was too great to be encountered without an immense premium. In private transactions, an astonishing degree of distrust also prevailed. The bonds of men whose ability to pay their debts was unquestionable, could not be negotiated but at a discount of thirty, forty, and fifty per centum: real property was scarcely vendible; and sales of any article for ready money could be made only at a ruinous loss. The prospect of extricating the country from these embarrassments was by no means flattering. Whilst every thing else fluctuated, some of the causes which produced this calamitous state of things were permanent. The hope and fear still remained, that the debtor party would obtain the victory at the elections; and instead of making the painful effort to obtain relief by industry and economy, many rested all their hopes on legislative interference. The mass of national labour, and of national wealth, was consequently diminished. In every quarter were found those who asserted it to be impossible for the people to pay their public or private debts; and in some instances, threats were uttered of suspending the administration of justice by violence.

The fact that the U.S. debt has significantly lost its value isn't surprising, considering that the federal government had no funds and couldn't get any without the agreement of resistant and independent states to pay the accumulating interest. However, the devaluation of the debt from those states that made yearly and adequate provisions for interest can be attributed solely to a lack of confidence in governments that followed no firm principles, and it's worth noting. In many of those states that rejected every attempt to introduce a devalued medium of trade or to undermine the annual funding for interest payments, the debt's value dropped to ten, five, or even less than four shillings per pound. Regardless of how reliable the current legislature might be, the risk posed by future ones was too significant to face without a huge premium. A serious level of distrust also prevailed in private transactions. The bonds of individuals whose ability to pay their debts was unquestionable could only be traded at a thirty, forty, or fifty percent discount: real estate was nearly unsellable; and any sales for cash could only be made at a devastating loss. The outlook for getting the country out of these troubles was certainly not promising. While everything else was unstable, some causes of this disastrous situation were enduring. Hopes and fears remained that the debtor party would win in the elections, and instead of making the difficult effort to find relief through hard work and frugality, many pinned all their hopes on government intervention. Consequently, the overall national labor and wealth were diminished. Everywhere, there were those who claimed it was impossible for people to pay their public or private debts; in some cases, threats were made to disrupt the administration of justice through violence.

By the enlightened friends of republican government, this gloomy state of things was viewed with deep chagrin. Many became apprehensive that those plans from which so much happiness to the human race had been anticipated, would produce only real misery; and would maintain but a short and a turbulent existence. Meanwhile, the wise and thinking part of the community, who could trace evils to their source, laboured unceasingly to inculcate opinions favourable to the incorporation of some principles into the political system, which might correct the obvious vices, without endangering the free spirit of the existing institutions.

By the enlightened supporters of republican government, this dismal situation was viewed with great disappointment. Many became worried that the plans expected to bring so much happiness to humanity would instead result in real suffering and lead to a brief and chaotic existence. Meanwhile, the thoughtful and intelligent members of the community, who could identify the root causes of the problems, worked tirelessly to promote ideas that would incorporate some principles into the political system, aiming to correct the clear flaws without threatening the free spirit of the current institutions.

While the advocates for union were exerting themselves to impress its necessity on the public mind, measures were taken in Virginia, which, though originating in different views, terminated in a proposition for a general convention to revise the state of the union.

While the supporters of the union were working hard to highlight its importance to the public, steps were taken in Virginia that, although stemming from different perspectives, ended in a proposal for a general convention to review the state of the union.

To form a compact relative to the navigation of the rivers Potomac and Pocomoke, and of part of the bay of Chesapeake, commissioners were appointed by the legislatures of Virginia and Maryland, who assembled in Alexandria, in March, 1785. While at Mount Vernon on a visit, they agreed to propose to their respective governments, the appointment of other commissioners, with power to make conjoint arrangements, to which the assent of congress was to be solicited, for maintaining a naval force in the Chesapeake; and to establish a tariff of duties on imports, to which the laws of both states should conform. When these propositions received the assent of the legislature of Virginia, an additional resolution was passed, directing that which respected the duties on imports to be communicated to all the states in the union, who were invited to send deputies to the meeting.

To create an agreement regarding the navigation of the Potomac and Pocomoke rivers, as well as part of the Chesapeake Bay, commissioners were appointed by the legislatures of Virginia and Maryland. They met in Alexandria in March 1785. During a visit to Mount Vernon, they decided to suggest to their governments the appointment of additional commissioners with the authority to make joint arrangements, which would be presented to Congress for approval, to maintain a naval force in the Chesapeake. They also aimed to establish a tariff on imports that both states would follow. Once these proposals were approved by the Virginia legislature, an additional resolution was passed to share the tariff details with all states in the union, inviting them to send representatives to the meeting.

On the 21st of January, 1786, a few days after the passage of these resolutions, another was adopted appointing certain commissioners,[30] "who were to meet such as might be appointed by the other states in the union, at a time and place to be agreed on, to take into consideration the trade of the United States; to examine the relative situation and trade of the said states; to consider how far a uniform system in their commercial relations may be necessary to their common interest, and their permanent harmony; and to report to the several states such an act relative to this great object, as, when unanimously ratified by them, will enable the United States in congress assembled effectually to provide for the same."

On January 21, 1786, a few days after these resolutions were passed, another one was adopted to appoint certain commissioners,[30] "who were to meet with those appointed by the other states in the union, at a time and place to be agreed upon, to consider the trade of the United States; to examine the current situation and trade of those states; to evaluate how necessary a uniform system in their commercial relations might be for their common interest and lasting harmony; and to report to the various states a proposed act related to this important issue that, when unanimously ratified by them, would enable the United States in Congress assembled to effectively address the matter."

In the circular letter transmitting these resolutions to the respective states, Annapolis in Maryland was proposed as the place, and the ensuing September as the time of meeting.

In the circular letter sending these resolutions to the respective states, Annapolis in Maryland was suggested as the location, and the following September as the time for the meeting.

Before the arrival of the period at which these commissioners were to assemble, the idea was carried by those who saw and deplored the complicated calamities which flowed from the intricacy of the general government, much further than was avowed by the resolution of Virginia. "Although," said one of the most conspicuous patriots[31] of the revolution, in a letter to General Washington, dated the 16th of March, 1786, "you have wisely retired from public employments, and calmly view from the temple of fame, the various exertions of that sovereignty and independence which Providence has enabled you to be so greatly and gloriously instrumental in securing to your country, yet I am persuaded you can not view them with the eye of an unconcerned spectator.

Before the time for these commissioners to gather arrived, the conversation among those who recognized and regretted the complicated troubles caused by the complexity of the general government went much deeper than what was stated in Virginia's resolution. "Even though," wrote one of the most prominent patriots[31] of the revolution in a letter to General Washington dated March 16, 1786, "you have wisely stepped back from public duties and are observing from the temple of fame the various efforts of that sovereignty and independence which Providence has allowed you to greatly and gloriously help secure for your country, I am convinced you cannot watch them as an indifferent bystander.

"Experience has pointed out errors in our national government which call for correction, and which threaten to blast the fruit we expected from our tree of liberty. The convention proposed by Virginia may do some good, and would perhaps do more, if it comprehended more objects. An opinion begins to prevail that a general convention for revising the articles of confederation would be expedient. Whether the people are yet ripe for such a measure, or whether the system proposed to be attained by it is only to be expected from calamity and commotion, is difficult to ascertain.

"Experience has highlighted flaws in our national government that need fixing and threaten to destroy the benefits we anticipated from our liberty. The convention suggested by Virginia might be helpful, and could be even more beneficial if it addressed more issues. There's a growing belief that a general convention to revise the articles of confederation would be a good idea. It’s hard to tell if the people are ready for such a step, or if the changes it aims for will only come about through crisis and unrest."

"I think we are in a delicate situation, and a variety of considerations and circumstances give me uneasiness. It is in contemplation to take measures for forming a general convention. The plan is not matured. If it should be well connected and take effect, I am fervent in my wishes that it may comport with the line of life you have marked out for yourself, to favour your country with your counsels on such an important and single occasion. I suggest this merely as a hint for consideration."

"I believe we're in a sensitive situation, and several factors are making me uneasy. I'm thinking about taking steps to create a general convention. The plan isn't fully developed yet. If it becomes well-organized and successful, I genuinely hope it aligns with the path you've chosen for yourself, so you can support your country with your advice during such an important and unique moment. I'm suggesting this just as a thought to consider."

In the moment of tranquillity, and of real or imaginary security, the mind delights to retrace the intricate path by which this point of repose has been attained. The patriots who accomplished that great revolution which has given to the American people a national government capable of maintaining the union of the states, and of preserving republican liberty, must be gratified with the review of that arduous and doubtful struggle, which terminated in the triumph of human reason, and the establishment of that government. Even to him who was not an actor in the busy scene, who enjoys the fruits of the labour without participating in the toils or the fears of the patriots who have preceded him, the sentiments entertained by the most enlightened and virtuous of America at the eventful period between the restoration of peace and the adoption of our present free and effective constitution, can not be uninteresting.

In moments of calm and real or imagined safety, the mind enjoys tracing back the complex path that led to this point of peace. The patriots who achieved that great revolution, which gave the American people a national government capable of maintaining the union of the states and preserving republican liberty, must feel pleased reflecting on that challenging and uncertain struggle, which ended in the victory of human reason and the establishment of that government. Even for someone who wasn’t involved in the lively events, who enjoys the benefits of the hard work without sharing in the struggles or fears of those who came before, the feelings held by the most enlightened and virtuous Americans during the crucial time between the restoration of peace and the adoption of our current free and effective constitution can’t be uninteresting.

"Our affairs," said the same gentleman in a letter of the 27th of June, "seem to lead to some crisis, some revolution—something that I can not foresee or conjecture. I am uneasy and apprehensive, more so than during the war. Then, we had a fixed object, and though the means and time of obtaining it were often problematical, yet I did firmly believe that we should ultimately succeed, because I did firmly believe that justice was with us. The case is now altered; we are going, and doing wrong, and therefore I look forward to evils and calamities, but without being able to guess at the instrument, nature, or measure of them.

"Our situation," said the same man in a letter dated June 27th, "seems to be heading towards some kind of crisis, some revolution—something I can’t predict or imagine. I feel uneasy and anxious, even more than I did during the war. Back then, we had a clear goal, and although the means and timing to achieve it were often uncertain, I genuinely believed we would ultimately succeed because I truly believed that justice was on our side. That’s not the case anymore; we are going down the wrong path, and because of that, I expect troubles and disasters, but I can’t figure out what form or extent they will take."

"That we shall again recover, and things again go well, I have no doubt. Such a variety of circumstances would not, almost miraculously, have combined to liberate and make us a nation, for transient and unimportant purposes. I therefore believe we are yet to become a great and respectable people—but when or how, only the spirit of prophecy can discern.

"That we will recover and things will get better again, I have no doubt. Such a range of circumstances could not, almost miraculously, have come together to free us and make us a nation for fleeting and insignificant reasons. I believe we are still meant to become a great and respected people—but when or how, only the spirit of prophecy can tell."

"There doubtless is much reason to think and to say that we are wofully, and, in many instances, wickedly misled. Private rage for property suppresses public considerations, and personal rather than national interests have become the great objects of attention. Representative bodies will ever be faithful copies of their originals, and generally exhibit a chequered assemblage of virtue and vice, of abilities and weakness. The mass of men are neither wise nor good, and the virtue, like the other resources of a country, can only be drawn to a point by strong circumstances, ably managed, or strong governments, ably administered. New governments have not the aid of habit and hereditary respect, and being generally the result of preceding tumult and confusion, do not immediately acquire stability or strength. Besides, in times of commotion, some men will gain confidence and importance who merit neither; and who, like political mountebanks, are less solicitous about the health of the credulous crowd, than about making the most of their nostrums and prescriptions.

"There’s definitely a lot of reason to think and say that we are seriously, and in many cases, wrongly misled. Personal greed for property overshadows public concerns, and individual rather than national interests have become the main focus. Representative bodies will always reflect their originals, generally showing a mix of good and bad, strengths and weaknesses. The majority of people are neither wise nor good, and virtue, like other resources of a country, can only be cultivated effectively under strong circumstances or capable governments. New governments lack the benefit of established customs and inherited respect, and since they usually emerge from previous chaos and disorder, they don’t quickly gain stability or strength. Additionally, during turbulent times, some people who aren’t deserving will gain confidence and influence, and like political charlatans, they care less about the well-being of the gullible crowd than about capitalizing on their remedies and ideas."

"What I most fear is, that the better kind of people (by which I mean the people who are orderly and industrious, who are content with their situations, and not uneasy in their circumstances) will be led by the insecurity of property, the loss of confidence in their rulers, and the want of public faith and rectitude, to consider the charms of liberty as imaginary and delusive. A state of uncertainty and fluctuation must disgust and alarm such men, and prepare their minds for almost any change that may promise them quiet and security."

"What I fear most is that the better kind of people (by which I mean those who are orderly and hardworking, who are satisfied with their situations, and who are not anxious about their circumstances) will be driven by the insecurity of property, the loss of trust in their leaders, and the lack of public integrity to see the appeal of liberty as fake and misleading. A situation of uncertainty and instability will likely disgust and alarm these individuals, making them open to any change that promises them peace and safety."

To this interesting letter, General Washington made the following reply: "Your sentiments that our affairs are drawing rapidly to a crisis, accord with my own. What the event will be is also beyond the reach of my foresight. We have errors to correct; we have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation. Experience has taught us that men will not adopt and carry into execution measures the best calculated for their own good, without the intervention of coercive power. I do not conceive we can exist long as a nation, without lodging somewhere a power which will pervade the whole union in as energetic a manner, as the authority of the state governments extends over the several states. To be fearful of investing congress, constituted as that body is, with ample authorities for national purposes, appears to me the very climax of popular absurdity and madness. Could congress exert them for the detriment of the people, without injuring themselves in an equal or greater proportion? Are not their interests inseparably connected with those of their constituents? By the rotation of appointment, must they not mingle frequently with the mass of citizens? Is it not rather to be apprehended, if they were possessed of the powers before described, that the individual members would be induced to use them, on many occasions, very timidly and inefficaciously, for fear of losing their popularity and future election? We must take human nature as we find it: perfection falls not to the share of mortals. Many are of opinion that congress have too frequently made use of the suppliant humble tone of requisition in applications to the states, when they had a right to assert their imperial dignity, and command obedience. Be that as it may, requisitions are a perfect nullity, where thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited states, are in the habit of discussing, and refusing or complying with them at their option. Requisitions are actually little better than a jest and a bye-word throughout the land. If you tell the legislatures they have violated the treaty of peace, and invaded the prerogatives of the confederacy, they will laugh in your face. What then is to be done? Things can not go on in the same train for ever. It is much to be feared, as you observe, that the better kind of people, being disgusted with these circumstances, will have their minds prepared for any revolution whatever. We are apt to run from one extreme into another. To anticipate and prevent disastrous contingencies, would be the part of wisdom and patriotism.

To this interesting letter, General Washington replied: "I agree with you that our situation is rapidly reaching a turning point. What will happen is beyond my prediction. We have mistakes to fix; we probably had too high an opinion of human nature when we created our confederation. Experience has shown us that people won’t put into action the best plans for their own benefit without some kind of enforcement. I don’t think we can last long as a nation without placing power somewhere that will operate throughout the entire union as effectively as state governments do within their states. Being afraid to give Congress, as it currently is, the powers it needs to address national issues seems to me like the height of foolishness. Could Congress act against the people's interests without harming themselves just as much or more? Aren’t their interests tightly connected to those of the people? With the rotation of appointments, don’t they mix with the public often? Isn’t it more likely that if they had those powers, individual members would use them cautiously and ineffectively for fear of losing their popularity and future elections? We must accept human nature as it is: perfection is not something mortals achieve. Many believe Congress has too often adopted a submissive tone when asking the states for help, even when they had the right to assert their authority and demand compliance. Regardless, requisitions become meaningless when thirteen independent states can choose to discuss and either refuse or accept them as they please. Requisitions are practically a joke across the country. If you tell the legislatures they’ve broken the peace treaty and violated the powers of the confederation, they’ll just laugh at you. So what should be done? Things can’t continue like this indefinitely. It’s concerning, as you pointed out, that decent people, frustrated by these conditions, will be open to any kind of change. We tend to swing from one extreme to another. Anticipating and preventing disastrous outcomes would show wisdom and patriotism."

"What astonishing changes a few years are capable of producing! I am told that even respectable characters speak of a monarchical form of government without horror. From thinking, proceeds speaking, thence to acting is often but a single step. But how irrevocable and tremendous! what a triumph for our enemies to verify their predictions!—what a triumph for the advocates of despotism to find that we are incapable of governing ourselves, and that systems founded on the basis of equal liberty are merely ideal and fallacious! Would to God that wise measures may be taken in time to avert the consequences we have but too much reason to apprehend.

"What incredible changes a few years can bring! I've heard that even respectable people speak about a monarchical government without fear. From thinking comes speaking, and often, moving from words to actions is just a small step. But how irreversible and significant! What a victory for our enemies to see their predictions come true!—what a win for those who support tyranny to discover that we can't govern ourselves, and that systems based on equal freedom are just fantasies and illusions! I wish that wise actions could be taken soon to prevent the outcomes we have too much reason to fear."

"Retired as I am from the world, I frankly acknowledge I can not feel myself an unconcerned spectator. Yet having happily assisted in bringing the ship into port, and having been fairly discharged, it is not my business to embark again on a sea of troubles.

"Even though I've retired from the world, I admit I can't feel like an uninterested observer. However, since I successfully helped bring the ship into port and have been properly discharged, it’s not my place to set sail again into a sea of troubles."

"Nor could it be expected that my sentiments and opinions would have much weight on the minds of my countrymen.—They have been neglected, though given as a last legacy in the most solemn manner.—I had then perhaps some claims to public attention.—I consider myself as having none at present."

"Nor could anyone expect that my feelings and opinions would carry much influence with my fellow citizens. They've been overlooked, even though I offered them as a final gift in the most serious way. Back then, I might have had some right to public attention. I believe I have none now."

The convention at Annapolis.

The convention at Annapolis was attended by commissioners from only six states.[32] These, after appointing Mr. Dickinson their chairman, proceeded to discuss the objects for which they had convened. Perceiving that more ample powers would be required to effect the beneficial purposes which they contemplated, and hoping to procure a representation from a greater number of states, the convention determined to rise without coming to any specific resolutions on the particular subject which had been referred to them. Previous to their adjournment, however, they agreed on a report to be made to their respective states, in which they represented the necessity of extending the revision of the federal system to all its defects, and recommended that deputies for that purpose be appointed by the several legislatures, to meet in convention in the city of Philadelphia, on the second day of the ensuing May.

The convention in Annapolis was attended by commissioners from only six states.[32] After choosing Mr. Dickinson as their chair, they began discussing the goals for which they had gathered. Realizing that they would need more authority to achieve the beneficial aims they envisioned, and hoping to gain support from more states, the convention decided to adjourn without making any specific resolutions on the particular subject that had been assigned to them. Before they ended the meeting, however, they agreed on a report to send back to their states, stating the need to review the entire federal system for its flaws. They recommended that the various legislatures appoint delegates for that purpose to convene in Philadelphia on May 2nd of the following year.

The reasons for preferring a convention to a discussion of this subject in congress were stated to be, "that in the latter body, it might be too much interrupted by the ordinary business before them, and would, besides, be deprived of the valuable counsels of sundry individuals who were disqualified by the constitution or laws of particular states, or by peculiar circumstances, from a seat in that assembly."

The reasons for choosing a convention over a discussion of this topic in Congress were described as, "that in Congress, it might be too disrupted by routine business, and would, in addition, miss out on the valuable advice of various individuals who were disqualified by the constitution or laws of specific states, or by unique circumstances, from being part of that assembly."

A copy of this report was transmitted to congress in a letter from the chairman, stating the inefficacy of the federal government, and the necessity of devising such further provisions as would render it adequate to the exigencies of the union.

A copy of this report was sent to Congress in a letter from the chairman, explaining the ineffectiveness of the federal government and the need to create additional measures that would make it sufficient for the needs of the union.

Virginia appoints deputies to meet those of other states at Philadelphia for the purpose of revising the federal system.

On receiving this report, the legislature of Virginia passed an act for the appointment of deputies to meet such as might be appointed by other states; to assemble in convention at Philadelphia, at the time, and for the purposes, specified in the recommendation from the convention which had met at Annapolis.

On receiving this report, the Virginia legislature passed a law to appoint deputies to meet with those appointed by other states; to gather in convention in Philadelphia, at the time and for the purposes outlined in the recommendation from the convention that had met in Annapolis.

In communicating this act to General Washington, its principal advocate[33] thus intimated the intention of aiding it by the influence and character of the chief of the revolution. "It has been thought adviseable to give the subject a very solemn dress, and all the weight which could be derived from a single state. This idea will also be pursued in the selection of characters to represent Virginia in the federal convention. You will infer our earnestness on this point, from the liberty which will be used of placing your name at the head of them. How far this liberty may correspond with the ideas by which you ought to be governed, will be best decided where it must ultimately be decided. In every event it will assist powerfully in marking the zeal of our legislature, and its opinion of the magnitude of the occasion."

In communicating this action to General Washington, its main supporter[33] hinted at the intention to back it by leveraging the influence and reputation of the leader of the revolution. "It has been considered wise to present the issue in a very serious manner, giving it the weight that could come from a single state. This concept will also guide the choice of representatives for Virginia in the federal convention. You can sense our seriousness on this matter from the permission we'll take to place your name at the forefront of them. How much this permission aligns with the principles you should follow will ultimately be determined in the proper forum. In any case, it will strongly demonstrate the enthusiasm of our legislature and its view of the importance of the occasion."

"Although," said the general in reply, "I have bid a public adieu to the public walks of life, and had resolved never more to tread that theatre; yet, if upon an occasion so interesting to the well being of the confederacy, it had been the wish of the assembly that I should be an associate in the business of revising the federal system, I should from a sense of the obligation I am under for repeated proofs of confidence in me, more than from any opinion I could entertain of my usefulness, have obeyed its call; but it is now out of my power to do this with any degree of consistency—the cause I will mention.

"Although," the general replied, "I've publicly said goodbye to public life and decided never to return to that stage, if it had been the wish of the assembly for me to be involved in revising the federal system, I would have felt obligated to respond due to the trust they've shown in me, more than any belief I have in my own usefulness. However, it's now impossible for me to do this with any consistency—I will explain the reason."

"I presume you heard, sir, that I was first appointed, and have since been rechosen president of the society of the Cincinnati; and you may have understood also, that the triennial general meeting of this body is to be held in Philadelphia the first Monday in May next. Some particular reasons combining with the peculiar situation of my private concerns, the necessity of paying attention to them, a wish for retirement and relaxation from public cares, and rheumatic pains which I begin to feel very sensibly, induced me, on the 31st ultimo, to address a circular letter to each state society, informing them of my intention not to be at the next meeting, and of my desire not to be rechosen president. The vice-president is also informed of this, that the business of the society may not be impeded by my absence. Under these circumstances, it will readily be perceived that I could not appear at the same time and place on any other occasion, without giving offence to a very respectable and deserving part of the community—the late officers of the American army."

"I assume you've heard, sir, that I was first appointed and have since been re-elected as president of the Cincinnati society; and you may also know that the triennial general meeting of this organization is set for the first Monday in May in Philadelphia. For some specific reasons, along with my particular personal circumstances, the need to focus on them, a desire for some peace and relaxation from public responsibilities, and the rheumatic pains I’m starting to feel quite acutely, led me, on the 31st of last month, to send a circular letter to each state society informing them of my intention not to attend the next meeting and my wish not to be re-elected as president. The vice-president has also been informed of this, so the society's business won’t be affected by my absence. Given these circumstances, it’s clear that I could not be present at the same time and place on any other occasion without offending a very respected and deserving part of the community—the former officers of the American army."

Washington chosen one of them.

Notwithstanding this letter, the name of General Washington was not withdrawn, and he was unanimously chosen a member of the convention. On receiving private information of this appointment, he addressed a second letter to his confidential friend, in which he detailed more at large, the motives which induced him to decline a service, the importance of which he felt sensibly, and which he would willingly have undertaken but for the peculiar circumstances which were stated.

Notwithstanding this letter, General Washington's name was not withdrawn, and he was unanimously chosen as a member of the convention. After receiving private information about this appointment, he wrote a second letter to his close friend, where he explained in more detail the reasons that led him to decline a role he recognized as very important and would have gladly accepted if it weren't for the specific circumstances he mentioned.

His name, however, was continued in the appointment. The gloomy aspect of affairs in the north rendered this the more necessary, and it was thus explained by his correspondent. "I have considered well the circumstances which it (your letter) confidentially discloses, as well as those contained in your preceding favour. The difficulties which they oppose to an acceptance of the appointment in which you are included, can as little be denied, as they can fail to be regretted. But I still am inclined to think, that the posture of our affairs, if it should continue, would prevent any criticism on the situation which the contemporary meetings would place you in; and wish that at least a door could be kept open for your acceptance hereafter, in case the gathering clouds should become so dark and menacing as to supersede every consideration but that of our national existence or safety. A suspense of your ultimate determination would be nowise inconvenient in a public view, as the executive are authorized to fill vacancies, and can fill them at any time; and in any event, three out of seven deputies are authorized to represent the state. How far it may be admissible in another view, will depend perhaps in some measure on the chance of your finally undertaking the service, but principally on the correspondence which is now passing on the subject, between yourself and the governor."

His name, however, remained in the appointment. The serious situation in the north made this even more necessary, and it was explained by his correspondent. "I have carefully considered the information your letter shares with me, along with what you mentioned in your earlier correspondence. The challenges that come with accepting the appointment you’re included in can’t be denied or regretted. However, I still believe that the state of our affairs, if it continues, would prevent any criticism regarding the situation that the upcoming meetings would put you in; and I hope that at least a possibility remains for you to accept it later, in case the looming problems become so severe that they overshadow any concerns other than our national survival or safety. Delaying your final decision wouldn’t be an issue from a public standpoint, as the executive has the authority to fill vacancies at any time; furthermore, three out of seven deputies can represent the state. How appropriate it may be from another perspective depends partly on the likelihood of you eventually taking on the role, but mainly on the discussions that are currently occurring between you and the governor."

The governor of Virginia,[34] who was himself also elected to the convention, transmitted to General Washington the act, and the vote of the assembly in the following letter. "By the enclosed act you will readily discover that the assembly are alarmed at the storms which threaten the United States. What our enemies have foretold seems to be hastening to its accomplishment, and can not be frustrated but by an instantaneous, zealous, and steady union among the friends of the federal government. To you I need not press our present dangers. The inefficiency of congress you have often felt in your official character; the increasing languor of our associated republics you hourly see; and a dissolution would be, I know, to you, a source of the deepest mortification.

The governor of Virginia,[34] who was also elected to the convention, sent General Washington a letter with the act and the assembly's vote. "From the enclosed act, you will quickly see that the assembly is alarmed by the threats facing the United States. What our enemies have predicted seems to be coming true, and it can only be prevented by a swift, passionate, and consistent unity among those who support the federal government. I don't need to emphasize our current dangers to you. You've often experienced the shortcomings of Congress in your official role; you see the growing weakness of our united republics every day; and I know that a dissolution would be a great source of disappointment for you.

"I freely then entreat you to accept the unanimous appointment of the general assembly to the convention at Philadelphia. For the gloomy prospect still admits one ray of hope, that those who began, carried on, and consummated the revolution, can yet rescue America from the impending ruin."

"I sincerely ask you to accept the unanimous decision of the general assembly to join the convention in Philadelphia. While the outlook is bleak, there’s still a glimmer of hope that those who initiated, continued, and completed the revolution can still save America from the looming disaster."

"Sensible as I am," said the general in reply, "of the honour conferred on me by the general assembly of this commonwealth, in appointing me one of the deputies to a convention proposed to be held in the city of Philadelphia in May next, for the purpose of revising the federal constitution; and desirous as I am on all occasions of testifying a ready obedience to the calls of my country—yet, sir, there exist at this moment, circumstances which I am persuaded will render this fresh instance of confidence incompatible with other measures which I had previously adopted, and from which seeing little prospect of disengaging myself, it would be disingenuous not to express a wish that some other character, on whom greater reliance can be had, may be substituted in my place, the probability of my non-attendance being too great to continue my appointment.

"Sensible as I am," the general replied, "of the honor given to me by the general assembly of this commonwealth, in appointing me as one of the deputies to a convention proposed for next May in Philadelphia, to revise the federal constitution; and eager as I am to always show my willingness to respond to my country’s needs—yet, sir, there are circumstances right now that I believe will make this new confidence difficult to maintain alongside other commitments I’ve already made. Since I see little chance of stepping away from those, I feel it’s only fair to suggest that someone else, someone who can be relied upon more, should take my place, as the likelihood of my not being able to attend is too high to keep my appointment."

"As no mind can be more deeply impressed than mine is with the critical situation of our affairs, resulting in a great measure from the want of efficient powers in the federal head, and due respect to its ordinances, so consequently those who do engage in the important business of removing these defects, will carry with them every good wish of mine, which the best dispositions towards their attainment can bestow."

"As no one can be more deeply aware than I am of the serious situation we’re facing, largely due to the lack of effective authority in the federal government and proper respect for its regulations, those who take on the important task of addressing these issues will have my best wishes and support for their success."

The executive, unwilling to relinquish the advantages which the legislature had expected to derive from exhibiting the name of Washington at the head of the Virginia delegation, refused to consider him as having declined the appointment. That his judgment had not completely decided on the course which duty and patriotism required him to pursue; that in a crisis on which probably depended the union of the states, and the happiness of America, he refused himself reluctantly to the anxious wishes of his countrymen; were too apparent not to leave a hope that events might yet determine him to yield to their desires. He was therefore emphatically requested not to decide absolutely, and was informed that as no inconvenience would result from not appointing a successor, the option of complying with the earnest solicitations of those who considered the effort about to be made as the last hope of the union, would, as long as possible, be permitted to remain with him. In the mean time, those who persuaded themselves that much good might result from the proposed convention, continued to urge him with delicacy but with earnestness, not to withhold on this great and particular occasion, those inestimable services which the confidence so justly reposed by the public in his talents and character, enabled him alone to render.

The executive, unwilling to give up the advantages that the legislature expected to gain by having Washington lead the Virginia delegation, refused to accept that he had turned down the appointment. It was clear that he hadn't fully decided on the path that duty and patriotism required him to take; in a crisis that likely impacted the unity of the states and the happiness of America, he was hesitant to dismiss the eager wishes of his fellow citizens. It was too obvious not to leave a glimmer of hope that circumstances might lead him to give in to their requests. He was therefore strongly urged not to make a final decision and was informed that since there would be no consequences for not appointing a successor, he could keep the option open to comply with the passionate appeals of those who viewed the upcoming effort as the last hope for the union for as long as possible. Meanwhile, those who believed that the proposed convention could bring about significant benefits continued to delicately yet earnestly press him not to withhold his invaluable services on this critical occasion, which only he could provide due to the trust placed in his abilities and character.

Placed in these circumstances, General Washington weighed deliberately in his own mind the arguments for and against accepting the appointment which was so seriously pressed upon him. That the proposed convention was, in any point of view in which it could be contemplated, an object of the first magnitude, appeared to him to be undeniable. It was apparent that the actual government could not exist much longer without additional means. It was therefore necessary to meet the solemn question whether it ought to be supported or annihilated. Those who embraced the former part of the alternative must consider the convention as the only remaining experiment from which the federal government could derive powers sufficiently ample for its preservation. Those who embraced the latter, who thought that on a full and dispassionate revision of the system, its continuance would be adjudged impracticable or unwise, could not hesitate to admit that their opinion would derive great additional weight from the sanction of so respectable a body as that which was about to assemble: and that in such an event, it was greatly desirable, and would afford some security against civil discord, to put the public in possession of a plan prepared and digested by such high authority. "I must candidly confess," he added in a letter to Colonel Humphries, "as we could not remain quiet more than three or four years in time of peace, under the constitutions of our own choosing, which were believed in many states to have been formed with deliberation and wisdom, I see little prospect either of our agreeing on any other, or that we should remain long satisfied under it, if we could. Yet I would wish any thing and every thing essayed to prevent the effusion of blood, and to avert the humiliating and contemptible figure we are about to make in the annals of mankind!"

Placed in these circumstances, General Washington thoughtfully considered the arguments for and against accepting the appointment that was being strongly urged upon him. It was clear to him that the proposed convention was a significant matter, no matter how it was viewed. He realized that the current government couldn’t last much longer without additional support. Therefore, it was crucial to address the serious question of whether it should be upheld or dismantled. Those who favored the first option had to see the convention as the last viable attempt to empower the federal government enough to ensure its survival. Meanwhile, those who preferred the latter option, believing that a careful and objective review of the system would label its continuation as unfeasible or unwise, could not deny that their stance would gain substantial credibility from the endorsement of such a respected assembly. In such a case, it would be highly desirable and provide some assurance against civil unrest to present the public with a plan developed and refined by such esteemed experts. "I must honestly admit," he wrote in a letter to Colonel Humphries, "that since we couldn't stay still for more than three or four years in peacetime under the constitutions we designed ourselves, which many states believed were created thoughtfully and wisely, I see little chance of us agreeing on any other solution, or that we would remain satisfied under it for long, even if we could. Still, I wish anything and everything could be tried to prevent bloodshed and to avoid the disgraceful and humiliating impression we’re about to leave in the history of mankind!"

Earnestly as General Washington wished success to the experiment about to be made, he could not surrender his objections to the step its friends urged him to take, without the most serious consideration. In addition to that which grew out of his connexion with the Cincinnati, and to the reluctance with which he could permit himself to be drawn, on any occasion, into a political station, there were others which could not be disregarded. A convention, not originating in a recommendation of congress, was deemed by many an illegitimate meeting; and as the New England states had neglected the invitation to appear by their representatives at Annapolis, there was reason to apprehend they might be equally inattentive to the request now made them to assemble at Philadelphia. To appear in a public character, for a purpose not generally deemed of the utmost importance, would not only be unpleasant to himself, but might diminish his capacity to be useful on occasions which subsequent events might produce. "If," said he in a private letter to a military friend, "this second attempt to convene the states for the purposes proposed by the report of the partial representation at Annapolis in September, should also prove abortive, it may be considered as unequivocal evidence that the states are not likely to agree on any general measure which is to pervade the union, and of course, that there is an end of the federal government. The states which make this last dying essay to avoid this misfortune would be mortified at the issue, and their deputies would return home chagrined at their ill success and disappointment. This would be a disagreeable circumstance to any one of them, but more particularly to a person in my situation." His letters of consultation therefore, with a few confidential friends, also requested information respecting those points on which his own judgment might ultimately be formed. He was particularly desirous of knowing how the proposition made by Virginia was received in the other states, and what measures were taken to contravene, or to give it effect. He inquired too with the utmost solicitude how the members of the Cincinnati would receive his appearance in convention, after declining to be rechosen the president of that society.

As much as General Washington wanted the upcoming experiment to succeed, he couldn't ignore his concerns about the step its supporters were urging him to take without serious thought. Besides his connection with the Cincinnati and his reluctance to take on any political role, there were other reasons he couldn't overlook. Many viewed a convention that didn't originate from a congressional recommendation as an illegitimate gathering; since the New England states had ignored the invitation to send representatives to Annapolis, there was cause to fear they might also disregard the request to assemble in Philadelphia. Showing up in a public role for something not generally considered critically important would not only be uncomfortable for him, but could also reduce his ability to help in situations that might arise later. "If," he wrote in a private letter to a military friend, "this second attempt to bring the states together for the purposes suggested by the partial representation at Annapolis in September also fails, it will be clear evidence that the states are unlikely to agree on any general measure that affects the union, essentially signaling the end of the federal government. The states making this last desperate effort to avoid this situation would be embarrassed by the outcome, and their representatives would return home frustrated by their lack of success. This would be disappointing for any of them, but especially for someone in my position." Therefore, his letters asking for advice from a few trusted friends also sought information on points that would shape his own judgment. He was particularly eager to know how Virginia's proposal was received in the other states and what actions were taken to oppose or support it. He also inquired with great concern about how the members of the Cincinnati would react to his participation in the convention after he had declined to be re-elected as president of that society.

The enlightened friends of the union and of republican government, generally regarded the convention as a measure which afforded the best chance for preserving liberty and internal peace. And those whose hopes predominated over their fears, were anxious to increase the probability of deriving from it every practicable good, by retaining on the list of its members, the most conspicuous name of which America could boast. But this opinion was not universal. Among those who felt the importance of the crisis, and who earnestly wished that a free government, competent to the preservation of the union, might be established, there were some who despaired of a favourable issue to the attempt, and who were therefore anxious to rescue their general from the increased mortification which would attend its failure, should he be personally engaged in it. They believed that all the states would not be represented in the convention. In a letter of the 20th of January, 1787, Colonel Humphries, who was himself under this impression, thus accounts for the omission of the federal men in the assembly of Connecticut, to press the appointment of deputies. "The reason," he said, "was a conviction that the persons who could be elected were some of the best anti-federal men in the state, who believed, or acted as if they believed, that the powers of congress were already too unlimited, and who would wish, apparently, to see the union dissolved. These demagogues," continued the letter, "really affect to persuade the people (to use their own phraseology) that they are only in danger of having their liberties stolen away by an artful designing aristocracy. But should the convention be formed under the most favourable auspices, and should the members be unanimous in recommending, in the most forcible, the most glowing, and the most pathetic terms which language can afford, that it is indispensable to the salvation of the country, congress should be clothed with more ample powers, the states," he thought, "would not all comply with the recommendation. They have a mortal reluctance to divest themselves of the smallest attribute of independent separate sovereignties." After assigning many reasons against accepting the appointment, this gentleman added: "the result of the convention may not perhaps be so important as is expected, in which case your character would be materially affected. Other people can work up the present scene. I know your personal influence and character is justly considered the last stake which America has to play. Should you not reserve yourself for the united call of a continent entire?

The enlightened supporters of the union and republican government generally viewed the convention as the best opportunity to protect liberty and maintain internal peace. Those whose hopes outweighed their fears were eager to maximize the benefits derived from it by keeping the most notable name America could offer on its member list. However, this opinion wasn’t universal. Among those who recognized the significance of the situation and genuinely hoped for a free government capable of preserving the union, some despaired of a positive outcome and wanted to spare their leader from the embarrassment that would come with its failure, especially if he was personally involved. They believed not all states would be represented at the convention. In a letter dated January 20, 1787, Colonel Humphries, who shared this belief, explained the absence of federal supporters in the Connecticut assembly to advocate for the appointment of deputies. "The reason," he stated, "was the realization that the people who could be elected were among the best anti-federalists in the state, who either believed or acted as if they believed that Congress already had too much power, and who seemingly wanted to see the union fall apart. These demagogues," the letter continued, "pretend to convince the public (to use their own terms) that they are only in danger of having their freedoms taken away by a scheming aristocracy. However, if the convention were to be formed under the best conditions, and if its members unanimously insisted, in the strongest, most passionate, and most emotional terms language can provide, that it is essential for the country's survival that Congress be given greater powers, he believed not all states would follow that recommendation. They have a deep resistance to giving up even the smallest aspect of their independent sovereignties." After listing several reasons against accepting the appointment, this gentleman added: "The outcome of the convention may not be as significant as expected, which would negatively impact your reputation. Others can handle the current situation. I know your personal influence and reputation are rightly viewed as America’s last resort. Shouldn't you hold off to respond to the united call of the entire continent?"

"If you should attend on this convention, and concur in recommending measures which should be generally adopted, but opposed in some parts of the union, it would doubtless be understood that you had in a degree pledged yourself for their execution. This would at once sweep you back inevitably into the tide of public affairs."

"If you attend this convention and agree on recommending measures that should be widely adopted but are opposed in some areas of the union, it would certainly be understood that you, to some extent, committed yourself to their implementation. This would inevitably pull you back into the flow of public affairs."

The same opinion was also intimated by another military friend[35] who had always possessed a large portion of the esteem and affection of his general. After stating the various and contradictory plans of government which were suggested by the schemers of the day, he added: "you will see by this sketch, my dear sir, how various are the opinions of men, and how difficult it will be to bring them to concur in any effective government. I am persuaded, if you were determined to attend the convention, and it should be generally known, it would induce the eastern states to send delegates to it. I should therefore be much obliged for information of your decision on this subject. At the same time, the principles of the purest and most respectful friendship induce me to say, that however strongly I wish for measures which would lead to national happiness and glory, yet I do not wish you to be concerned in any political operations, of which there are such various opinions. There may indeed arise some solemn occasion, in which you may conceive it to be your duty again to exert your utmost talents to promote the happiness of your country. But this occasion must be of an unequivocal nature, in which the enlightened and virtuous citizens should generally concur."

The same opinion was also shared by another military friend[35] who had always held a significant amount of respect and affection from his general. After outlining the various and conflicting plans of government that were suggested by the schemers of the time, he added: "You can see from this overview, my dear sir, how diverse people's opinions are and how challenging it will be to get them to agree on an effective government. I'm convinced that if you decided to attend the convention and it became widely known, it would encourage the eastern states to send delegates. I would greatly appreciate knowing your decision on this matter. At the same time, the genuine principles of the purest and most respectful friendship lead me to say that, while I strongly hope for actions that will promote national happiness and glory, I do not want you to be involved in any political activities that have such varying opinions. There may indeed come a serious occasion when you feel it is your duty to use your talents to benefit your country again. But that occasion must be unmistakable, where enlightened and virtuous citizens would generally agree."

While the confidential friends of General Washington were thus divided on the part which it behoved him to act, there was much reason to fear that a full representation of the states would not be obtained. Among those who were disinclined to a convention, were persons who were actuated by different, and even by opposite motives. There were probably some who believed that a higher toned[36] government than was compatible with the opinions generally prevailing among the friends of order, of real liberty, and of national character, was essential to the public safety. They believed that men would be conducted to that point only through the road of misery into which their follies would lead them, and that "times must be worse before they could be better." Many had sketched in their own minds a plan of government strongly resembling that which had been actually adopted, but despaired of seeing so rational a system accepted, or even recommended; "some gentlemen," said the correspondent last mentioned, "are apprehensive that a convention of the nature proposed to meet in May next, might devise some expedient to brace up the present defective confederation, so as just to serve to keep us together, while it would prevent those exertions for a national character which are essential to our happiness: that in this point of view it might be attended with the bad effect of assisting us to creep on in our present miserable condition, without a hope of a generous constitution, that should, at the same time, shield us from the effects of faction, and of despotism."[37] Many discountenanced the convention, because the mode of calling it was deemed irregular, and some objected to it, because it was not so constituted as to give authority to the plan which should be devised. But the great mass of opposition originated in a devotion to state sovereignty, and in hostility to any considerable augmentation of federal power.

While General Washington's close friends were divided on what action he should take, there were significant concerns that a complete representation of the states wouldn't be achieved. Among those against a convention were individuals motivated by various, even conflicting reasons. Some likely believed that a stronger government, which clashed with the widely-held views of those who valued order, genuine liberty, and national dignity, was necessary for public safety. They thought that people would only reach that point through the painful consequences of their mistakes and that "things must get worse before they can get better." Many had envisioned a government plan similar to the one that was eventually adopted, but felt hopeless about it being accepted or recommended; "some gentlemen," said the correspondent mentioned earlier, "are worried that a convention proposed to meet next May might come up with a solution to strengthen the current flawed confederation just enough to keep us together, while preventing the efforts needed for a national identity that is essential for our happiness. In this sense, it could have the negative effect of allowing us to continue in our current sorry state, with no hope for a thoughtful constitution that would protect us from factionalism and tyranny." Many opposed the convention because the way it was called was seen as irregular, and some objected because it wasn't structured to legitimize the plan that would be developed. However, the bulk of the opposition was rooted in a commitment to state sovereignty and resistance to any significant increase in federal power.

The ultimate decision of the states on this interesting proposition seems to have been in no inconsiderable degree influenced by the commotions which about that time agitated all New England, and particularly Massachusetts.

The final decision of the states on this intriguing proposal appears to have been significantly affected by the unrest that was stirring throughout New England, especially in Massachusetts.

Insurrection in Massachusetts.

Those causes of discontent which existed, after the restoration of peace, in every part of the union, were particularly operative in New England. The great exertions which had been made by those states in the course of the war, had accumulated a mass of debt, the taxes for the payment of which were the more burdensome, because their fisheries had become unproductive. The restlessness produced by the uneasy situation of individuals, connected with lax notions concerning public and private faith, and erroneous opinions which confound liberty with an exemption from legal control, produced a state of things which alarmed all reflecting men, and demonstrated to many the indispensable necessity of clothing government with powers sufficiently ample for the protection of the rights of the peaceable and quiet, from the invasions of the licentious and turbulent part of the community.

The reasons for discontent that arose after peace was restored were especially strong in New England. The significant efforts made by those states during the war led to a heavy accumulation of debt, and the taxes needed to pay it off became even more burdensome since their fisheries had become unproductive. The anxiety stemming from the difficult circumstances of individuals, combined with relaxed views on public and private responsibility, and misguided ideas that confused freedom with freedom from legal authority, created a situation that worried many thoughtful people. This highlighted for many the urgent need to empower the government with sufficient authority to protect the rights of the peaceful and law-abiding against the encroachments of the reckless and disorderly segments of society.

This disorderly spirit was cherished by unlicensed conventions, which, after voting their own constitutionality, and assuming the name of the people, arrayed themselves against the legislature, and detailed at great length the grievances by which they alleged themselves to be oppressed. Its hostility was principally directed against the compensation promised to the officers of the army, against taxes, and against the administration of justice: and the circulation of a depreciated currency was required, as a relief from the pressure of public and private burdens which had become, it was alleged, too heavy to be borne. Against lawyers and courts, the strongest resentments were manifested; and to such a dangerous extent were these dispositions indulged, that, in many instances, tumultuous assemblages of people arrested the course of law, and restrained the judges from proceeding in the execution of their duty. The ordinary recourse to the power of the country was found an insufficient protection, and the appeals made to reason were attended with no beneficial effect. The forbearance of the government was attributed to timidity rather than to moderation, and the spirit of insurrection appeared to be organized into a regular system for the suppression of courts.

This chaotic spirit was embraced by unapproved gatherings, which, after declaring their own legitimacy and taking on the name of the people, turned against the legislature and extensively detailed the grievances they claimed to suffer. Their main anger was directed against the promised pay for army officers, against taxes, and against the justice system: they demanded the circulation of a devalued currency as relief from the overwhelming public and private burdens they claimed had become intolerable. The strongest resentment was shown towards lawyers and courts; these feelings were so intense that, in many cases, unruly crowds interrupted legal processes and prevented judges from carrying out their duties. The usual reliance on the country’s power proved inadequate for protection, and appeals to reason had no positive effect. The government’s forbearance was seen as cowardice rather than restraint, and the spirit of rebellion seemed to be organized into a systematic effort to disrupt the courts.

In the bosom of Washington, these tumults excited attention and alarm. "For God's sake tell me," said he in a letter to Colonel Humphries, "what is the cause of all these commotions? Do they proceed from licentiousness, British influence disseminated by the tories, or real grievances which admit of redress? if the latter, why was redress delayed until the public mind had become so much agitated? if the former, why are not the powers of government tried at once? It is as well to be without, as not to exercise them. Commotions of this sort, like snow-balls, gather strength as they roll, if there is no opposition in the way to divide and crumble them."

In the heart of Washington, these disturbances drew attention and concern. "For heaven's sake, tell me," he wrote to Colonel Humphries, "what is causing all these upheavals? Are they driven by lawlessness, British influence spread by the Tories, or genuine grievances that can be addressed? If it's the latter, why was action delayed until the public was so agitated? If it's the former, why not immediately test the government's powers? It's just as good to be without them as to not use them. Disturbances like these, similar to snowballs, gain momentum as they roll unless there's opposition to break and scatter them."

"As to your question, my dear general," said Colonel Humphries in reply, "respecting the cause and origin of these commotions, I hardly find myself in condition to give a certain answer. If from all the information I have been able to obtain, I might be authorized to hazard an opinion, I should attribute them to all the three causes which you have suggested. In Massachusetts particularly, I believe there are a few real grievances; and also some wicked agents or emissaries who have been busy in magnifying the positive evils, and fomenting causeless jealousies and disturbances. But it rather appears to me, that there is a licentious spirit prevailing among many of the people; a levelling principle; a desire of change; and a wish to annihilate all debts, public and private." "It is indeed a fact," said General Knox, after returning from a visit to the eastern country, "that high taxes are the ostensible cause of the commotion, but that they are the real cause, is as far remote from truth, as light is from darkness. The people who are the insurgents have never paid any, or but very little taxes. But they see the weakness of government. They feel at once their own poverty compared with the opulent, and their own force; and they are determined to make use of the latter, in order to remedy the former. Their creed is, that the property of the United States has been protected from confiscation by the joint exertions of all, and therefore ought to be common to all. And he that attempts opposition to this creed is an enemy to equity and justice, and ought to be swept from the face of the earth."

"As for your question, my dear general," Colonel Humphries replied, "about the cause and origin of these disturbances, I’m not really in a position to give a definite answer. Based on all the information I’ve been able to gather, if I were to venture an opinion, I would attribute them to all three causes you mentioned. In Massachusetts in particular, I believe there are a few genuine grievances, as well as some malicious agents who have been busy exaggerating the real issues and stirring up baseless fears and unrest. However, it seems to me that there’s a reckless spirit among many people; a leveling mentality; a desire for change; and a wish to eliminate all debts, both public and private." "It’s true," General Knox said after returning from a trip to the eastern states, "that high taxes are the obvious cause of the uproar, but that they are the real cause is as far from the truth as light is from darkness. The people who are rebelling have never paid any taxes, or very little. But they see the government is weak. They feel their own poverty compared to the wealthy, and they recognize their own power; they are determined to use that power to address their situation. Their belief is that the property of the United States has been protected from confiscation through the collective efforts of all, and therefore it should belong to everyone. Anyone who opposes this belief is seen as an enemy of fairness and justice and should be removed from existence."

The force of this party throughout New England was computed by General Knox at twelve or fifteen thousand men. "They were chiefly," he said, "of the young and active part of the community, who were more easily collected than kept together. Desperate and unprincipled, they would probably commit overt acts of treason which would compel them, for their own safety, to embody and submit to discipline. Thus would there be a formidable rebellion against reason, the principle of all government, and the very name of liberty. This dreadful situation," he added, "has alarmed every man of principle and property in New England. They start as from a dream, and ask—what has been the cause of our delusion? What is to afford us security against the violence of lawless men? Our government must be braced, changed, or altered, to secure our lives and our property. We imagined that the mildness of the government, and the virtue of the people were so correspondent, that we were not as other nations, requiring brutal force to support the laws. But we find that we are men, actual men, possessing all the turbulent passions belonging to that animal; and that we must have a government proper and adequate for him. Men of reflection and principle are determined to endeavour to establish a government which shall have the power to protect them in their lawful pursuits, and which will be efficient in cases of internal commotions, or foreign invasions. They mean that liberty shall be the basis, a liberty resulting from the equal and firm administration of the laws."

The strength of this group across New England was estimated by General Knox to be around twelve to fifteen thousand men. "They were mainly," he said, "the young and active members of the community, who were easier to gather than to keep together. Desperate and unprincipled, they would likely commit acts of treason that would force them, for their own safety, to organize and follow some form of discipline. This would create a serious rebellion against reason, which is the foundation of all government, and the very concept of liberty. This alarming situation," he added, "has frightened every person of principle and property in New England. They wake up as if from a dream and ask—what caused our misunderstanding? What can protect us against the actions of lawless individuals? Our government needs to be reinforced, changed, or modified to ensure our safety and protect our property. We believed that the gentleness of the government and the integrity of the people were so aligned that we were different from other nations, needing no brute force to uphold the laws. But we realize that we are human beings, actual humans, with all the turbulent emotions that come with being human; and that we need a government that is appropriate and effective for us. Thoughtful and principled individuals are committed to establishing a government that can protect them in their lawful endeavors and effectively manage internal unrest or foreign threats. They intend for liberty to be the foundation, a liberty stemming from an equal and consistent application of the laws."

Deeply affected by these commotions, General Washington continued his anxious inquiries respecting the course they threatened to take. "I feel, my dear General Knox," said he, in answer to the letter from which the foregoing extracts are taken, "infinitely more than I can express to you, for the disorders which have arisen in these states. Good God! who besides a tory could have foreseen, or a Briton have predicted them? I do assure you that even at this moment, when I reflect upon the present aspect of our affairs, it seems to me like the visions of a dream. My mind can scarcely realize it as a thing in actual existence:—so strange, so wonderful does it appear to me. In this, as in most other matters, we are too slow. When this spirit first dawned, it might probably have been easily checked; but it is scarcely within the reach of human ken, at this moment, to say when, where, or how it will terminate. There are combustibles in every state, to which a spark might set fire.

Deeply affected by these events, General Washington kept asking anxiously about the direction they might take. "I feel, my dear General Knox," he said in response to the letter from which the previous quotes are taken, "infinitely more than I can express to you about the disturbances that have arisen in these states. Good God! who besides a Loyalist could have foreseen, or a Brit could have predicted them? I assure you that even now, when I think about the current state of our affairs, it feels like a dream. My mind can barely accept it as real: so strange, so unbelievable it seems to me. In this, as in most other matters, we are moving too slowly. When this spirit first appeared, it likely could have been easily contained; but it's now nearly impossible to say when, where, or how it will end. There are flammable materials in every state, just waiting for a spark to ignite them."

"In bewailing, which I have often done with the keenest sorrow, the death of our much lamented friend General Greene,[38] I have accompanied my regrets of late with a query, whether he would not have preferred such an exit to the scenes which it is more than probable, many of his compatriots may live to bemoan."

"In expressing my sorrow, which I have often done with great sadness, over the death of our dearly missed friend General Greene,[38] I have recently added a question to my regrets: would he not have preferred such an exit to the situations that it’s likely many of his fellow countrymen may live to mourn?"

Ostensibly, on account of the danger which threatened the frontiers, but, really, with a view to the situation of Massachusetts, congress had agreed to augment the military establishment to a legionary corps of two thousand and forty men, and had detached the secretary of war, General Knox, to that state, with directions to concert measures with its government for the safety of the arsenal at Springfield. So inauspicious was the aspect of affairs, as to inspire serious fears that the torch of civil discord, about to be lighted up in Massachusetts, would communicate its flame to all New England, and perhaps to the union. Colonel Lee, a member of congress, drew the following picture of the condition of the eastern country at that time. "General Knox has just returned, and his report, grounded on his own knowledge, is replete with melancholy information. A majority of the people of Massachusetts are in opposition to the government. Some of the leaders avow the subversion of it to be their object, together with the abolition of debts, the division of property, and a reunion with Great Britain. In all the eastern states, same temper prevails more or less, and will certainly break forth whenever the opportune moment may arrive. The malcontents are in close connexion with Vermont, and that district, it is believed, is in negotiation with the government of Canada. In one word, my dear general, we are all in dire apprehension that a beginning of anarchy with all its calamities is made, and we have no means to stop the dreadful work. Knowing your unbounded influence, and believing that your appearance among the seditious might bring them back to peace and reconciliation, individuals suggest the propriety of an invitation to you from congress to pay us a visit. This is only a surmise, and I take the liberty to mention it to you, that, should the conjuncture of affairs induce congress to make this request, you may have some previous time for reflection on it."

Ostensibly due to the threat facing the frontiers, but really regarding the situation in Massachusetts, Congress agreed to increase the military to a legion of two thousand and forty men and sent the Secretary of War, General Knox, to that state to coordinate measures with its government for the safety of the arsenal at Springfield. The situation looked so bleak that it raised serious concerns that the spark of civil unrest about to ignite in Massachusetts would spread to all of New England, and possibly to the entire union. Colonel Lee, a member of Congress, described the condition of the eastern states at that time: "General Knox has just returned, and his report, based on his own knowledge, is filled with grim details. A majority of the people in Massachusetts oppose the government. Some of the leaders openly declare that overthrowing it is their goal, along with cancelling debts, redistributing property, and reuniting with Great Britain. This same attitude is seen to varying degrees in all the eastern states, and it will definitely erupt whenever the opportunity arises. The dissenters are closely linked with Vermont, and it’s believed that area is negotiating with the Canadian government. In short, my dear general, we are all in deep fear that the beginning of anarchy, along with all its disasters, has started, and we have no way to stop it. Understanding your significant influence, and believing that your presence among the dissenters could bring them back to peace and reconciliation, some individuals suggest that Congress extend an invitation for you to visit us. This is merely a suggestion, and I take the liberty to mention it so that if the circumstances lead Congress to make this request, you have some time to consider it."

"The picture which you have exhibited," replied the general, "and the accounts which are published of the commotions and temper of numerous bodies in the eastern country, present a state of things equally to be lamented and deprecated. They exhibit a melancholy verification of what our transatlantic foes have predicted; and of another thing perhaps which is still more to be regretted, and is yet more unaccountable—that mankind when left to themselves are unfit for their own government. I am mortified beyond expression when I view the clouds which have spread over the brightest morn that ever dawned upon any country. In a word, I am lost in amazement when I behold what intrigue, the interested views of desperate characters, ignorance and jealousy of the minor part, are capable of effecting as a scourge on the major part of our fellow citizens of the union; for it is hardly to be supposed that the great body of the people, though they will not act, can be so short sighted or enveloped in darkness, as not to see rays of a distant sun through all this mist of intoxication and folly.

"The picture you have shown," replied the general, "and the reports published about the unrest and mood of various groups in the eastern country, highlight a situation that is both regrettable and concerning. They sadly confirm what our overseas adversaries have predicted; and there’s another thing perhaps even more regrettable and harder to understand—that when left to their own devices, people are unfit to govern themselves. I am incredibly disheartened when I see the clouds that have settled over the brightest morning that has ever dawned on any nation. In short, I am astounded when I witness how intrigue, the self-serving motives of desperate individuals, ignorance, and jealousy from the minority can wreak havoc on the majority of our fellow citizens in the union; for it’s hard to believe that the vast majority of the people, even if they won’t act, can be so shortsighted or shrouded in darkness that they can’t see glimmers of a far-off sun through all this haze of confusion and foolishness."

"You talk, my good sir, of employing influence to appease the present tumults in Massachusetts. I know not where that influence is to be found; nor if attainable, that it would be a proper remedy for these disorders. Influence is not government. Let us have a government, by which our lives, liberties, and properties will be secured; or let us know the worst at once. Under these impressions, my humble opinion is, that there is a call for decision. Know precisely what the insurgents aim at. If they have real grievances, redress them if possible; or acknowledge the justice of them, and your inability to do it in the present moment. If they have not, employ the force of the government against them at once. If this is inadequate, all will be convinced that the superstructure is bad, or wants support. To be more exposed in the eyes of the world, and more contemptible than we already are, is hardly possible. To delay one or the other of these expedients, is to exasperate on the one hand, or to give confidence on the other, and will add to their numbers; for like snow-balls, such bodies increase by every movement, unless there is something in the way to obstruct and crumble them before their weight is too great and irresistible.

You talk, my good sir, about using influence to calm the current chaos in Massachusetts. I don't know where that influence can be found; and even if it could be found, I’m not sure it would be the right solution for these troubles. Influence is not government. Let’s establish a government that secures our lives, liberties, and property; or let’s face the worst right now. Given these thoughts, my humble opinion is that we need to make a decision. Understand exactly what the rebels want. If they have real grievances, address them if we can; or admit their validity and acknowledge your inability to resolve them at this moment. If they don’t have any, then use the government's power against them immediately. If that proves insufficient, everyone will believe that the structure we have is flawed or lacking support. It’s hardly possible to appear more exposed and contemptible in the eyes of the world than we already do. Delaying either of these options will only provoke them on one hand or give them confidence on the other, increasing their numbers; like snowballs, these movements grow with every action unless something stands in the way to break them apart before they become too heavy and unstoppable.

"These are my sentiments. Precedents are dangerous things. Let the reins of government then be braced, and held with a steady hand; and every violation of the constitution be reprehended. If defective, let it be amended, but not suffered to be trampled upon while it has an existence."

"These are my feelings. Precedents can be risky. So let's strengthen the control of government and manage it firmly; every breach of the constitution should be condemned. If it's flawed, let it be corrected, but we shouldn't allow it to be disregarded while it still exists."

In a letter written about the same period, Colonel Humphries, after stating his apprehensions that the insurgents would seize the continental magazine at Springfield, proceeded to add: "a general failure to comply with the requisitions of congress for money, seems to prognosticate that we are rapidly advancing to a crisis. The wheels of the great political machine can scarcely continue to move much longer, under their present embarrassment. Congress, I am told, are seriously alarmed, and hardly know which way to turn, or what to expect. Indeed, my dear general, nothing but a good Providence can extricate us from our present difficulties, and prevent some terrible conclusion.

In a letter written around the same time, Colonel Humphries, after expressing his concerns that the rebels would take the continental magazine in Springfield, went on to say: "a widespread failure to meet Congress's requests for money seems to indicate that we are quickly heading toward a crisis. The machinery of our political system can barely keep going much longer under these current challenges. I’ve heard Congress is genuinely worried and doesn’t know which direction to take or what to expect. Truly, my dear general, only a benevolent Providence can help us escape our current troubles and avoid a disastrous outcome."

"In case of civil discord I have already told you it was seriously my opinion that you could not remain neuter; and that you would be obliged in self defence, to take part on one side or the other, or withdraw from the continent. Your friends are of the same opinion; and I believe you are convinced that it is impossible to have more disinterested or zealous friends, than those who have been about your person."

"In the event of civil unrest, I’ve already mentioned that I genuinely believe you can’t stay neutral; you’ll have to defend yourself by either choosing a side or leaving the continent. Your friends feel the same way, and I believe you’re convinced that you couldn’t find more selfless or passionate supporters than those who have been around you."

"It is," said the general in reply, "with the deepest and most heartfelt concern, I perceive by some late paragraphs extracted from the Boston papers, that the insurgents of Massachusetts, far from being satisfied with the redress offered by their general court, are still acting in open violation of law and government, and have obliged the chief magistrate, in a decided tone, to call upon the militia of the state to support the constitution. What, gracious God, is man! that there should be such inconsistency and perfidiousness in his conduct. It is but the other day that we were shedding our blood to obtain the constitutions under which we now live—constitutions of our own choice and making—and now, we are unsheathing the sword to overturn them. The thing is so unaccountable, that I hardly know how to realize it; or to persuade myself that I am not under the illusion of a dream.

"It is," said the general in response, "with the deepest and most heartfelt concern that I notice from some recent excerpts in the Boston papers that the insurgents of Massachusetts, far from being satisfied with the help provided by their general court, are still blatantly violating the law and government. They have forced the chief magistrate, in a firm tone, to call upon the state's militia to uphold the constitution. What, dear God, is wrong with humanity! How can there be such inconsistency and betrayal in our actions? Just a short while ago, we were spilling our blood to secure the constitutions we now live under—constitutions of our own choice and creation—and now we're unsheathing swords to destroy them. It's so inexplicable that I can hardly believe it; I struggle to convince myself I'm not just dreaming."

"My mind, previous to the receipt of your letter of the first ultimo, had often been agitated by a thought similar to the one you expressed respecting an old friend of yours: but heaven forbid that a crisis should come when he shall be driven to the necessity of making a choice of either of the alternatives there mentioned."

"My mind, before I received your letter from the first of last month, had often been troubled by a thought similar to what you shared about an old friend of yours: but God forbid that a moment should come when he is forced to choose between the options you mentioned."

Finding that the lenient measures which had been taken by the legislature to reclaim the insurgents, only enlarged their demands; and that they were proceeding systematically to organize a military force for the subversion of the constitution; Governor Bowdoin determined, with the advice of council, on a vigorous exertion of all the powers he possessed, for the protection and defence of the commonwealth. Upwards of four thousand militia were ordered into service, and were placed under the command of the veteran General Lincoln. "His military reputation," says Mr. Minot, "and mildness of temper, rendered him doubly capacitated for so delicate and important a trust." But the public treasury did not afford the means of keeping this force in the field a single week; and, the legislature not being in session, the government was incapable of putting the troops in motion. This difficulty was removed by individual patriotism. From the commencement of the commotions, the citizens of Boston had manifested, unequivocally, their fidelity to the constitution. On this occasion, a number of gentlemen, preceded by the governor, subscribed, in a few hours, a sufficient sum to carry on the proposed expedition.

Finding that the lenient measures taken by the legislature to bring back the insurgents only increased their demands, and that they were systematically organizing a military force to undermine the constitution, Governor Bowdoin, with the council's advice, decided to vigorously use all the powers at his disposal to protect and defend the commonwealth. Over four thousand militia were called into service and placed under the command of veteran General Lincoln. "His military reputation," says Mr. Minot, "and mildness of temper made him especially qualified for such a delicate and important task." However, the public treasury lacked the resources to keep this force deployed for even a week, and with the legislature not in session, the government couldn't mobilize the troops. This challenge was overcome by individual patriotism. From the beginning of the unrest, the citizens of Boston had clearly shown their loyalty to the constitution. On this occasion, several gentlemen, led by the governor, quickly gathered a sufficient sum to fund the proposed expedition.

In the depth of winter, the troops from the eastern part of the state assembled near Boston, and marched towards the scene of action. Those from the western counties met in arms under General Shepard, and took possession of the arsenal at Springfield. Before the arrival of Lincoln, a party of the insurgents attempted to dislodge Shepard, but were repulsed with some loss. Not being pursued by that officer, who could not venture to weaken his post by detachments, they continued embodied, but did not venture again to undertake offensive operations.

In the middle of winter, the troops from the eastern part of the state gathered near Boston and marched towards the action. Those from the western counties united under General Shepard and took control of the arsenal at Springfield. Before Lincoln arrived, a group of insurgents tried to push Shepard out, but they were driven back with some losses. Since that officer couldn’t risk weakening his position by sending out detachments, he didn’t pursue them, and they remained organized but didn’t attempt any more offensive actions.

Urging his march with the utmost celerity, Lincoln soon came up; and, pressing the insurgent army, endeavoured, by a succession of rapid movements, in which the ardour of his troops triumphed over the severity of the season, to disperse, or to bring it to action. Their generals retreated from post to post with a rapidity which for some time eluded his designs; and, rejecting every proposition to lay down their arms, used all their address to produce a suspension of hostilities until an accommodation might be negotiated with the legislature. "Applications were also made," says General Lincoln, "by committees and select men of the several towns in the counties of Worcester and Hampshire, praying that the effusion of blood might be avoided, while the real design of these applications was supposed to be, to stay our operations until a new court should be elected. They had no doubt, if they could keep up their influence until another choice of the legislature and of the executive, that matters might be moulded in general court to their wishes. To avoid this, was the duty of government." In answer to these applications, Lincoln exhorted those towns who sincerely wished to put an end to the rebellion without the effusion of blood, "to recall their men now in arms, and to aid in apprehending all abettors of those who should persist in their treason, and all who should yield them any comfort or supplies."

Urging his march with the utmost speed, Lincoln soon caught up; and, pressing the rebel army, he tried, through a series of quick movements where the enthusiasm of his troops overcame the harshness of the weather, to scatter or engage them in battle. Their generals moved from place to place so quickly that it initially thwarted his plans; and, rejecting every suggestion to surrender, they did everything they could to create a ceasefire until a deal could be negotiated with the legislature. "There were also requests," says General Lincoln, "from committees and representatives of various towns in the counties of Worcester and Hampshire, asking that bloodshed be avoided, while the true aim of these requests was believed to be to halt our operations until a new court could be elected. They were confident that if they could maintain their influence until a new selection of the legislature and executive, they could shape matters in the general court to their liking. Preventing this was the government’s responsibility." In response to these requests, Lincoln urged those towns that genuinely wanted to end the rebellion without bloodshed, "to recall their men now in arms, and to help capture all supporters of those who would continue their treason, and anyone who provided them with comfort or supplies."

The army of government continued to brave the rigours of the climate, and to press the insurgents without intermission. At length, with the loss of a few killed, and several prisoners, the rebels were dispersed, their leaders driven out of the state, and this formidable and wicked rebellion was quelled.

The government army kept facing the harsh climate and relentlessly pressed the rebels. Finally, with only a few soldiers lost and several taken prisoner, the insurgents were scattered, their leaders expelled from the state, and this powerful and evil rebellion was put down.

The same love of country which had supported the officers and soldiers of the late army through a perilous war, still glowed in their bosoms; and the patriot veterans of the revolution, uninfected by the wide spreading contagion of the times, arranged themselves almost universally under the banners of the constitution and of the laws. This circumstance lessened the prejudices which had been excited against them as creditors of the public, and diminished the odium which, in the eastern states, especially, had been directed against the order of the Cincinnati. But the most important effect of this unprovoked rebellion was, a deep conviction of the necessity of enlarging the powers of the general government; and the consequent direction of the public mind towards the convention which was to assemble at Philadelphia.

The same love for the country that had kept the officers and soldiers of the recent army going through a dangerous war still burned in their hearts; and the patriotic veterans of the revolution, unaffected by the widespread issues of the time, largely united under the banners of the constitution and the laws. This situation lessened the biases that had been stirred up against them as public creditors and reduced the resentment that had especially been directed at the order of the Cincinnati in the eastern states. However, the most significant outcome of this unprovoked rebellion was a strong belief in the need to expand the powers of the federal government, which shifted public attention towards the convention that was set to meet in Philadelphia.

In producing this effect, a resolution of congress had also considerable influence. New York had given her final veto to the impost system, and in doing so, had virtually decreed the dissolution of the existing government. The confederation was apparently expiring from mere debility. The last hope of its friends having been destroyed, the vital necessity of some measure which might prevent the separation of the integral parts of which the American empire was composed, became apparent even to those who had been unwilling to perceive it; and congress was restrained from giving its sanction to the proposed convention, only by an apprehension that their taking an interest in the measure would impede rather than promote it. From this embarrassment, the members of that body were relieved by the legislature of New York. A vote of that state, which passed in the senate by a majority of only one voice, instructed its delegation to move in congress, a resolution, recommending to the several states, to appoint deputies to meet in convention, for the purpose of revising and proposing amendments to the federal constitution. On the 21st of February, 1787, the day succeeding the instructions given by New York, the subject, which had been for some time under consideration, was finally acted upon: and it was declared, "in the opinion of congress, to be expedient that, on the second Monday in May next, a convention of delegates, who shall have been appointed by the several states, be held at Philadelphia, for the sole and express purpose of revising the articles of confederation, and reporting to congress and the several legislatures, such alterations and provisions therein, as shall, when agreed to in congress, and confirmed by the states, render the federal constitution adequate to the exigencies of government, and the preservation of the union."

In creating this effect, a congressional resolution also played a significant role. New York had given its final veto to the tax system, and in doing so, had essentially declared the end of the current government. The confederation seemed to be fading away due to its weakness. With the last hope of its supporters gone, the urgent need for a solution to prevent the breakup of the integral parts of the American empire became clear, even to those who had been reluctant to see it. Congress was held back from supporting the proposed convention only by the fear that their involvement would hinder rather than help it. The members of Congress were relieved from this predicament by the New York legislature. A vote from that state, which passed in the senate by just one vote, instructed its delegation to propose a resolution in Congress recommending that the various states appoint delegates to meet in convention, to revise and suggest amendments to the federal constitution. On February 21, 1787, the day after New York issued its instructions, the topic, which had been under consideration for some time, was finally addressed: it was declared "in the opinion of Congress, to be wise that, on the second Monday in May next, a convention of delegates, who shall have been appointed by the several states, be held in Philadelphia, for the sole and express purpose of revising the articles of confederation, and reporting to Congress and the various legislatures such changes and provisions as shall, when agreed to in Congress, and confirmed by the states, make the federal constitution sufficient for the needs of government and the preservation of the union."

This recommendation removed all objections to the regularity of the convention; and co-operated with the impressions made by the licentious and turbulent spirit which had lately endangered the peace and liberty of New England, to incline those states to favour the measure. By giving the proposed meeting a constitutional sanction, and by postponing it to a day subsequent to that on which the Cincinnati were to assemble, it also removed one impediment, and diminished another, to the attendance of General Washington as a member. He persuaded himself that by repairing to Philadelphia previous to the second Monday in May, in order to attend the general meeting of the Cincinnati, he should efface any impressions unfavourable to the attachment he felt to his military friends, which might otherwise be excited in their bosoms by his appearing in a public character, after declining the presidency of their society. The increasing probability that the convention would be attended by a full representation of the states, and would propose a scheme of government which, if accepted, might conduce to the public happiness, and would not be unworthy of his character, had also its influence on his mind. An opinion too began to prevail, that the government must be invigorated by agreement or by force, and that a part of the opposition to the convention originated in a desire to establish a system of greater energy than could spring from consent. The idea that his refusing his aid in the present crisis might be attributed to a dereliction of republican principles, furnished additional motives for yielding to the wishes of his fellow citizens. On the 28th of March, he addressed a letter to the governor of Virginia, in which, after stating the reasons which had induced him to decline attending the convention, the influence of which he still felt, he added—"However, as my friends, with a degree of solicitude which is unusual, seem to wish for my attendance on this occasion, I have come to a resolution to go if my health will permit, provided from the lapse of time between your excellency's letter and this reply, the executive may not (the reverse of which would be highly pleasing to me) have turned their thoughts to some other character."

This recommendation cleared up any doubts about the legitimacy of the convention and worked alongside the chaotic and reckless spirit that had recently threatened the peace and freedom of New England, leading those states to support the initiative. By giving the proposed meeting official backing and delaying it until after the Cincinnati were scheduled to gather, it also removed one barrier and lessened another for General Washington's attendance as a member. He convinced himself that by heading to Philadelphia before the second Monday in May to attend the Cincinnati's general meeting, he could eliminate any negative feelings towards his loyalty to his military friends, which might arise from him taking on a public role after turning down the presidency of their society. The growing chance that the convention would have a full representation from the states and propose a government plan that could improve public well-being and be worthy of his reputation also influenced his thoughts. There was also a rising belief that the government needed to be strengthened either through agreement or force, and that some opposition to the convention stemmed from a desire to establish a more robust system than what could be achieved through consent. The notion that refusing to lend his support during this critical time might be seen as abandoning republican values provided him with additional reasons to listen to the wishes of his fellow citizens. On March 28th, he sent a letter to the governor of Virginia, in which, after explaining the reasons that had led him to initially decline attending the convention—which he still felt the impact of—he added, "However, since my friends are unusually eager for me to be present on this occasion, I have decided to go if my health allows, unless, given the time that has passed since your excellency's letter and my reply, the executive has considered someone else (the opposite of which would please me greatly)."

After communicating this determination to the executive of Virginia, he received a letter from the secretary of war, one of the small number of his friends who had endeavoured to dissuade him from the resolution he had ultimately taken, in which that officer avowed an entire change of opinion on this subject. "It is," said he, "the general wish that you should attend. It is conceived to be highly important to the success of the propositions which may be made by the convention.

After sharing this decision with the leader of Virginia, he got a letter from the secretary of war, one of the few friends who tried to talk him out of his final choice, in which that official expressed a complete change of mind on the matter. "It is," he said, "the general consensus that you should attend. It's believed to be very important for the success of the proposals that might be put forward by the convention."

"The mass of the people feel the inconvenience of the present government, and ardently wish for such alterations as would remedy them. These must be effected by reason and by agreement, or by force. The convention appears to be the only mean by which to effect them peaceably. If it should not be attended by a proper weight of wisdom and character to carry into execution its propositions, we are to look to events, and to force, for a remedy. Were you not then to attend the convention, slander and malice might suggest that force would be the most agreeable mode of reform to you. When civil commotion rages, no purity of character, no services, however exalted, can afford a secure shield from the shafts of calumny.

"The majority of people are feeling the problems with the current government and really want changes that would fix them. These changes need to happen either through reasoned discussion and agreement or through force. The convention seems to be the only way to make these changes peacefully. If it lacks the right amount of wisdom and integrity to implement its ideas, we may have to rely on events and force for a solution. If you choose not to attend the convention, people might wrongly assume that force would be your preferred way to bring about reform. When civil unrest is at its peak, no amount of integrity or high achievements can protect you from the attacks of slander."

"On the other hand, the unbounded confidence the people have in your tried patriotism and wisdom, would exceedingly facilitate the adoption of any important alterations that might be proposed by a convention of which you were a member; and (as I before hinted) the president."

"On the other hand, the immense confidence that people have in your proven patriotism and wisdom would greatly help in adopting any significant changes that a convention, which you were part of, might suggest; and (as I mentioned earlier) the president."

Convention at Philadelphia.

At the time and place appointed, the representatives of twelve states convened. In Rhode Island alone a spirit sufficiently hostile to every species of reform was found, to prevent the election of deputies on an occasion so generally deemed momentous. Having unanimously chosen General Washington for their president, the convention proceeded, with closed doors, to discuss the interesting and extensive subject submitted to their consideration.

At the scheduled time and place, representatives from twelve states gathered. Only in Rhode Island was there a strong enough opposition to any kind of reform that it stopped the election of delegates for an occasion that was widely considered important. After unanimously selecting General Washington as their president, the convention moved forward behind closed doors to discuss the significant and broad topic they needed to address.

On the great principles which should constitute the basis of their system, not much contrariety of opinion is understood to have prevailed. But on the various and intricate modifications of those principles, an equal degree of harmony was not to be expected. More than once, there was reason to fear that the rich harvest of national felicity, which had been anticipated from the ample stock of worth collected in convention, would all be blasted by the rising of that body without effecting the object for which it was formed. At length the high importance attached to union triumphed over local interests; and, on the 17th of September, that constitution which has been alike the theme of panegyric and invective, was presented to the American public.

On the key principles that should form the foundation of their system, there wasn’t much disagreement. However, when it came to the various and complex changes to those principles, a similar level of agreement was not to be expected. More than once, there was concern that the great promise of national happiness, which had been anticipated from the rich talents gathered in convention, would be destroyed if that group disbanded without achieving its purpose. Finally, the significant importance of unity overcame local interests, and on September 17th, that constitution, which has drawn both praise and criticism, was presented to the American public.

The instrument with its accompanying resolutions was by the unanimous order of the convention, transmitted to congress in a letter subscribed by the president, in which it was said to be, "the result of a spirit of amity, and of that mutual deference and concession, which the peculiarity of their political situation rendered indispensable.

The document, along with its related resolutions, was sent to Congress by the unanimous decision of the convention in a letter signed by the president. The letter stated that it was "the result of a spirit of friendship and the mutual respect and compromise that their unique political situation made essential."

A form of government for the United States is submitted to the respective states, which is ratified by eleven of them.

"That it will meet the full and entire approbation of every state," continued the letter, "is not, perhaps, to be expected; but each will doubtless consider, that had her interests been alone consulted, the consequences might have been particularly disagreeable or injurious to others. That it is liable to as few exceptions as could reasonably have been expected, we hope and believe; that it may promote the lasting welfare of that country so dear to us all, and secure her freedom and happiness, is our most ardent wish."

"That it will receive the complete approval of every state," continued the letter, "may not be realistic; however, each will surely realize that if only their interests had been taken into account, the outcomes could have been quite unpleasant or harmful to others. We hope and believe that it faces as few objections as could reasonably be expected, and that it will foster the lasting well-being of this country we all hold dear, securing its freedom and happiness, is our strongest wish."

Congress resolved unanimously, that the report with the letter accompanying it be transmitted to the several legislatures, in order to be submitted to a convention of delegates chosen in each state by the people thereof.

Congress agreed unanimously that the report along with the accompanying letter should be sent to the various legislatures so it can be presented to a convention of delegates elected by the citizens in each state.

Neither the intrinsic merits of the constitution nor the imposing weight of character by which it was supported, gave assurance to its friends that it would be ultimately adopted. A comparison of the views and interests by which a powerful party was actuated, with particular provisions in the constitution which were especially designed to counteract those views and interests, prepared them to expect a mass of zealous and active opposition, against which the powers of reason would be in vain directed, because the real motives in which it originated would not be avowed. There were also many individuals, possessing great influence and respectable talents, who, from judgment, or from particular causes, seemed desirous of retaining the sovereignty of the states unimpaired, and of reducing the union to an alliance between independent nations. To these descriptions of persons, joined by those who supposed that an opposition of interests existed between different parts of the continent, was added a numerous class of honest men, many of whom possessed no inconsiderable share of intelligence, who could identify themselves perfectly with the state government, but who considered the government of the United States as in some respects foreign. The representation of their particular state not composing a majority of the national legislature, they could not consider that body as safely representing the people, and were disposed to measure out power to it with the same sparing hand with which they would confer it on persons not chosen by themselves, not accountable to them for its exercise, nor having any common interest with them. That power might be abused, was, to persons of this opinion, a conclusive argument against its being bestowed; and they seemed firmly persuaded that the cradle of the constitution would be the grave of republican liberty. The friends and the enemies of that instrument were stimulated to exertion by motives equally powerful; and, during the interval between its publication and adoption, every faculty of the mind was strained to secure its reception or rejection. The press teemed with the productions of temperate reason, of genius, and of passion; and it was apparent that each party believed power, sovereignty, liberty, peace, and security;—things most dear to the human heart;—to be staked on the question depending before the public. From that oblivion which is the common destiny of fugitive pieces, treating on subjects which agitate only for the moment, was rescued, by its peculiar merit, a series of essays which first appeared in the papers of New York. To expose the real circumstances of America, and the dangers which hung over the republic; to detect the numerous misrepresentations of the constitution; to refute the arguments of its opponents; and to confirm, and increase, its friends, by a full and able development of its principles; three gentlemen,[39] distinguished for their political experience, their talents, and their love of union, gave to the public a series of numbers which, collected in two volumes under the title of the FEDERALIST, will be read and admired when the controversy in which that valuable treatise on government originated, shall be no longer remembered.

Neither the intrinsic merits of the constitution nor the impressive support from its advocates reassured its supporters that it would be ultimately adopted. A comparison of the views and interests driving a powerful party, with specific provisions in the constitution aimed at countering those views and interests, led them to expect a strong and active opposition. They realized that reasoned arguments would be wasted because the true motivations behind this opposition would not be openly acknowledged. Additionally, many influential individuals with respectable talents seemed, either through judgment or specific reasons, to want to maintain the sovereignty of the states untouched, preferring to keep the union as an alliance between independent nations. This group, along with those who believed there was a conflict of interests between various parts of the continent, included many honest individuals, many of whom had significant intelligence, who fully identified with their state governments but viewed the U.S. government as somewhat foreign. Since their particular state's representation did not make up a majority of the national legislature, they could not see that body as safely representing the people and were inclined to limit the power given to it just as they would to anyone not chosen by them, who wasn’t accountable for its exercise, nor shared common interests with them. The possibility of that power being misused was, for people holding this opinion, a convincing argument against granting it; they firmly believed that the constitution's inception would lead to the demise of republican liberty. Both supporters and opponents of that document were equally motivated to work hard; during the time between its publication and adoption, every mental resource was utilized to ensure its acceptance or rejection. The press was filled with writings of thoughtful reason, talent, and passion, and it was evident that each side believed that power, sovereignty, liberty, peace, and security—things most precious to the human heart—were at stake in the public debate. From the oblivion typically faced by fleeting writings dealing with momentary issues, a valuable series of essays, distinguished by their merit, emerged in the New York newspapers. These essays aimed to clarify the true circumstances of America, highlight the dangers threatening the republic, expose the many misrepresentations of the constitution, counter the arguments of its critics, and solidify and expand its support by thoroughly explaining its principles. Three gentlemen,[39] distinguished for their political experience, talents, and commitment to union, published a series of articles that were later collected into two volumes under the title of the FEDERALIST. These will continue to be read and admired long after the controversy that inspired this important treatise on government is forgotten.

To decide the interesting question which agitated a continent, the best talents of the several states were assembled in their respective conventions. So balanced were parties in some of them, that, even after the subject had been discussed for a considerable time, the fate of the constitution could scarcely be conjectured; and so small, in many instances, was the majority in its favour, as to afford strong ground for the opinion that, had the influence of character been removed, the intrinsic merits of the instrument would not have secured its adoption. Indeed, it is scarcely to be doubted that, in some of the adopting states, a majority of the people were in the opposition. In all of them, the numerous amendments which were proposed, demonstrate the reluctance with which the new government was accepted; and that a dread of dismemberment, not an approbation of the particular system under consideration, had induced an acquiescence in it. The interesting nature of the question, the equality of the parties, the animation produced inevitably by ardent debate, had a necessary tendency to embitter the dispositions of the vanquished, and to fix more deeply, in many bosoms, their prejudices against a plan of government, in opposition to which all their passions were enlisted.

To address the compelling question that stirred a nation, the top minds from different states gathered in their respective conventions. In some cases, political parties were so evenly matched that, after discussing the topic for a significant time, it was hard to predict the outcome of the constitution; in many instances, the majority supporting it was so slim that it strongly suggests that if personal influence had been removed, the inherent qualities of the document might not have won its approval. Indeed, it's likely that in some of the states that ratified it, most of the population was actually against it. The many amendments proposed in all of the conventions show just how hesitant people were to accept the new government; it seemed that a fear of fragmentation, rather than an endorsement of the specific system being debated, drove their acceptance. The intriguing nature of the issue, the balance of power between the parties, and the energy generated by passionate debate inevitably increased the bitterness among those who were defeated, deepening their biases against a government plan that they vehemently opposed.

1788

At length, the conventions of eleven states[40] assented to and ratified the constitution; and the preparatory measures were taken for bringing it into operation.

At last, the conventions of eleven states[40] agreed to and approved the constitution, and the necessary steps were taken to put it into effect.

From the moment the public was possessed of this new arrangement of their political system, the attention of all was directed to General Washington as the first President of the United States. He alone was believed to fill so pre-eminent a station in the public opinion, that he might be placed at the head of the nation without exciting envy; and he alone possessed the confidence of the people in so unlimited a degree that under his auspices, the friends of the government might hope to see it introduced with a degree of firmness which would enable it to resist the open assaults, and secret plots of its numerous adversaries. By all who knew him, fears were entertained that his preference for private life would prevail over the wishes of the public; and, soon after the adoption of the constitution was ascertained, his correspondents began to press him on a point which was believed essential to the completion of the great work on which the grandeur and happiness of America was supposed to depend. "We can not," said Mr. Johnson, a gentleman of great political eminence in Maryland, "do without you, and I, and thousands more can explain to any body but yourself, why we can not do without you." "I have ever thought," said Mr. Gouverneur Morris, a gentleman who had been among the most valuable members of congress through great part of the war, and who had performed a most splendid part in the general convention, "and have ever said that you must be president; no other man can fill that office. No other man can draw forth the abilities of our country into the various departments of civil life. You alone can awe the insolence of opposing factions, and the greater insolence of assuming adherents. I say nothing of foreign powers, nor of their ministers. With these last you will have some plague. As to your feelings on this occasion, they are, I know, both deep and affecting; you embark property most precious on a most tempestuous ocean: for, as you possess the highest reputation, so you expose it to the perilous chance of popular opinion. On the other hand, you will, I firmly expect, enjoy the inexpressible felicity of contributing to the happiness of all your countrymen. You will become the father of more than three millions of children; and while your bosom glows with parental tenderness, in theirs, or at least in a majority of them, you will excite the duteous sentiments of filial affection. This, I repeat it, is what I firmly expect; and my views are not directed by that enthusiasm which your public character has impressed on the public mind. Enthusiasm is generally short sighted and too often blind. I form my conclusions from those talents and virtues which the world believes, and which your friends know you possess."

From the moment the public learned about this new setup for their political system, everyone focused their attention on General Washington as the first President of the United States. He was seen as the only person who could take on such a prominent role without stirring up jealousy; and he was also trusted by the people to such an extent that, with his support, the government’s supporters hoped to see it established firmly enough to withstand both the open attacks and hidden schemes of its many opponents. Those who knew him worried that his preference for private life would outweigh the public's wishes; soon after the constitution was ratified, his correspondents started urging him on a point they believed was crucial for completing the important task that the greatness and happiness of America hinged upon. "We can’t," said Mr. Johnson, a notable political figure from Maryland, "do without you, and I, along with thousands of others, can explain to anyone but you why we can’t do without you." "I have always thought," said Mr. Gouverneur Morris, who had been one of the most valuable members of Congress throughout much of the war and had played a significant role in the general convention, "and always said that you must be president; no one else can fill that role. No other person can bring out the talents of our country in the various areas of civil life. You alone can intimidate the arrogance of opposing groups and the even greater arrogance of their followers. I won’t even mention foreign powers or their representatives. You will have some issues with them. Regarding your feelings about this situation, I know they are profound and moving; you are risking your most treasured possessions on a very unpredictable journey: because, while you have the highest reputation, you also expose it to the risky unpredictability of public opinion. On the other hand, I truly believe you will experience the immense joy of contributing to the happiness of all your fellow citizens. You will become the father of over three million children; and while your heart swells with parental affection, you will inspire dutiful feelings of respect among them, or at least the majority of them. I emphasize this, as I truly expect it; and my perspective isn’t swayed by the excitement your public status has stirred in the minds of the people. Enthusiasm tends to be shortsighted and often blind. I form my opinions based on the talents and virtues that the world believes you possess, and which your friends know you have."

To those who attribute human action in every case to the motives which most usually guide the human mind, it will appear scarcely possible that the supreme magistracy could possess no charms for a man long accustomed to command others; and that ambition had no share in tempting the hero of the American revolution to tread once more the paths of public life. Yet, if his communications to friends to whom he unbosomed the inmost sentiments of his soul be inspected, it will be difficult to resist the conviction that the struggle produced by the occasion was unaffected, and that, in accepting the presidency of the United States, no private passion was gratified; but a decided preference for private life yielded to a sense of duty, and a deep conviction of his obligations to his country.

To those who think that human actions are always driven by the usual motives of the human mind, it may seem hard to believe that someone who was used to leading others would have no attraction to the highest office, and that ambition didn’t play a role in drawing the hero of the American Revolution back into public life. However, if we look at his communications with friends, where he shared his deepest feelings, it becomes hard to deny that the inner conflict he faced was genuine, and that when he accepted the presidency of the United States, it wasn’t for personal gain. Instead, his strong preference for a private life was overcome by a sense of duty and a profound conviction about his responsibilities to his country.

As this is an important æra in the life of Washington, and the motives by which he was actuated will assist in developing his real character, the American reader, at least, will be gratified at seeing copious extracts from his correspondence on this interesting occasion.

As this is an important era in Washington's life, and the reasons that motivated him will help reveal his true character, American readers, at least, will appreciate seeing extensive excerpts from his correspondence on this significant occasion.

In a letter detailing those arrangements which were making for the introduction of the new government, Colonel Lee proceeded thus to speak of the presidency of the United States. "The solemnity of the moment, and its application to yourself, have fixed my mind in contemplations of a public and a personal nature, and I feel an involuntary impulse which I can not resist, to communicate without reserve to you some of the reflections which the hour has produced. Solicitous for our common happiness as a people, and convinced as I continue to be that our peace and prosperity depend on the proper improvement of the present period, my anxiety is extreme that the new government may have an auspicious beginning. To effect this, and to perpetuate a nation formed under your auspices, it is certain that again you will be called forth.

In a letter outlining the arrangements being made for the introduction of the new government, Colonel Lee went on to discuss the presidency of the United States. "The seriousness of this moment, and its relevance to you, has led me to reflect on both public and personal matters, and I feel an uncontrollable urge to share some of my thoughts with you openly. Concerned for our shared happiness as a people, and firmly believing that our peace and prosperity depend on effectively managing this crucial time, I am extremely anxious that the new government starts off on a positive note. To achieve this, and to ensure the longevity of a nation established under your guidance, it is clear that you will once again need to step up."

"The same principles of devotion to the good of mankind, which have invariably governed your conduct, will no doubt continue to rule your mind, however opposite their consequences may be to your repose and happiness. It may be wrong, but I can not suppress, in my wishes for national felicity, a due regard for your personal fame and content.

"The same principles of dedication to the welfare of humanity, which have always guided your actions, will surely continue to influence your thoughts, no matter how contrary their outcomes may be to your peace and happiness. It might not be right, but I can't help wishing for national happiness while also considering your personal reputation and well-being."

"If the same success should attend your efforts on this important occasion which has distinguished you hitherto, then, to be sure, you will have spent a life which Providence rarely if ever before gave to the lot of one man. It is my anxious hope, it is my belief, that this will be the case; but all things are uncertain, and perhaps nothing more so than political events." He then proceeded to state his apprehensions, that the government might sink under the active hostility of its foes, and in particular, the fears which he entertained from the circular letter of New York, around which the minorities in the several states might be expected to rally.

"If your efforts during this important occasion are as successful as you've been so far, then you've truly lived a life that Providence rarely offers to one person. I genuinely hope and believe that will happen; however, everything is uncertain, especially in politics." He then went on to express his concerns that the government might collapse under the active opposition from its enemies, particularly the fears he had regarding the circular letter from New York, which might rally the minorities in various states.

To counteract its baneful influence with the legislature of Virginia, he expressed his earnest wish, that Mr. Madison might be prevailed on to take a seat in that assembly, and then added,

To counter its harmful influence with the Virginia legislature, he expressed his strong desire for Mr. Madison to be convinced to take a seat in that assembly, and then added,

"It would certainly be unpleasant to you, and obnoxious to all who feel for your just fame, to see you at the head of a trembling system. It is a sacrifice on your part unjustifiable in any point of view. But on the other hand no alternative seems to be presented.

"It would definitely be uncomfortable for you, and annoying for everyone who cares about your rightful reputation, to see you leading a shaky system. It’s a sacrifice on your part that isn’t justified from any angle. But on the other hand, there doesn’t seem to be any other option available."

"Without you, the government can have but little chance of success; and the people, of that happiness which its prosperity must yield."

"Without you, the government has little chance of success, and the people have little chance of the happiness that its prosperity should bring."

1789
Letters from Gen. Washington respecting the chief magistracy of the new government.

In reply to this letter General Washington said, "Your observations on the solemnity of the crisis, and its application to myself, bring before me subjects of the most momentous and interesting nature. In our endeavours to establish a new general government, the contest, nationally considered, seems not to have been so much for glory, as existence. It was for a long time doubtful whether we were to survive as an independent republic, or decline from our federal dignity into insignificant and wretched fragments of empire. The adoption of the constitution so extensively, and with so liberal an acquiescence on the part of the minorities in general, promised the former; but lately, the circular letter of New York has manifested, in my apprehension, an unfavourable, if not an insidious tendency to a contrary policy. I still hope for the best; but before you mentioned it, I could not help fearing it would serve as a standard to which the disaffected might resort. It is now evidently the part of all honest men, who are friends to the new constitution, to endeavour to give it a chance to disclose its merits and defects, by carrying it fairly into effect, in the first instance.

In response to this letter, General Washington said, "Your thoughts on the seriousness of the situation and how it relates to me bring to mind issues of great importance and interest. In our efforts to create a new federal government, the struggle, from a national perspective, seems less about glory and more about survival. For a long time, it was uncertain whether we would thrive as an independent republic or fall from our federal stature into insignificant and miserable fragments of an empire. The widespread adoption of the constitution, along with the relatively accepting attitude of the minorities, suggested the former was possible; however, recently, New York's circular letter has shown, in my view, a worrying, if not sneaky, shift towards the opposite direction. I still hope for the best, but before you brought it up, I couldn't help but worry that it would become a rallying point for those who are dissatisfied. It is now clear that all honest individuals who support the new constitution should work to give it a fair chance to reveal its strengths and weaknesses by implementing it properly from the start."

"The principal topic of your letter, is to me a point of great delicacy indeed;—insomuch that I can scarcely, without some impropriety, touch upon it. In the first place, the event to which you allude may never happen, among other reasons, because, if the partiality of my fellow citizens conceive it to be a mean by which the sinews of the new government would be strengthened, it will of consequence be obnoxious to those who are in opposition to it, many of whom, unquestionably, will be placed among the electors.

"The main topic of your letter is quite delicate for me; I can hardly address it without some awkwardness. First of all, the event you refer to might never happen. One reason for this is that if my fellow citizens see it as a way to strengthen the new government's power, it will likely be opposed by those against it, many of whom will undoubtedly be among the voters."

"This consideration alone would supersede the expediency of announcing any definitive and irrevocable resolution. You are among the small number of those who know my invincible attachment to domestic life, and that my sincerest wish is to continue in the enjoyment of it solely, until my final hour. But the world would be neither so well instructed, nor so candidly disposed, as to believe me to be uninfluenced by sinister motives, in case any circumstance should render a deviation from the line of conduct I had prescribed for myself indispensable. Should the contingency you suggest take place, and (for argument sake alone, let me say) should my unfeigned reluctance to accept the office be overcome by a deference for the reasons and opinions of my friends; might I not, after the declarations I have made, (and heaven knows they were made in the sincerity of my heart,) in the judgment of the impartial world, and of posterity, be chargeable with levity and inconsistency, if not with rashness and ambition? Nay, farther, would there not even be some apparent foundation for the two former charges? Now, justice to myself, and tranquillity of conscience require that I should act a part, if not above imputation, at least capable of vindication. Nor will you conceive me to be too solicitous for reputation. Though I prize as I ought the good opinion of my fellow citizens, yet, if I know myself, I would not seek or retain popularity at the expense of one social duty, or moral virtue. While doing what my conscience informed me was right, as it respected my God, my country, and myself, I could despise all the party clamour and unjust censure which must be expected from some, whose personal enmity might be occasioned by their hostility to the government. I am conscious, that I fear alone to give any real occasion for obloquy, and that I do not dread to meet with unmerited reproach. And certain I am, whensoever I shall be convinced the good of my country requires my reputation to be put in risque, regard for my own fame will not come in competition with an object of so much magnitude.

This thought alone would override the practicality of announcing any final and unchangeable decision. You are among the few who understand my strong attachment to home life, and that my deepest wish is to enjoy it completely until my last days. But the world wouldn’t really be educated or open-minded enough to believe I was not swayed by bad intentions if any situation made it necessary to deviate from the course I had set for myself. If the scenario you suggest were to occur, and (just for the sake of argument) if my genuine reluctance to accept the position were overcome by consideration for the reasons and opinions of my friends, might I not, after what I’ve said (and God knows I said it sincerely), be seen by fair-minded people, and by history, as trivial and inconsistent, if not reckless and ambitious? Furthermore, wouldn’t there even be some obvious basis for those two earlier accusations? Now, for my own justice and peace of mind, I need to act in a way that is, if not above reproach, at least defensible. And please don’t think I’m overly concerned about my reputation. While I value the good opinion of my fellow citizens as I should, if I know myself, I wouldn’t seek or maintain popularity at the cost of any social duty or moral virtue. While doing what my conscience tells me is right regarding God, my country, and myself, I could disregard all the party noise and unfair criticism that would come from some people whose personal dislike might stem from their opposition to the government. I’m aware that I alone have the power to give real reason for public disgrace, and that I’m not afraid to face unwarranted blame. And I’m certain that whenever I believe the good of my country requires me to risk my reputation, my concern for my own honor will not compete with something so significant.

"If I declined the task, it would be upon quite another principle. Notwithstanding my advanced season of life, my increasing fondness for agricultural amusements, and my growing love of retirement, augment and confirm my decided predilection for the character of a private citizen, yet it will be no one of these motives, nor the hazard to which my former reputation might be exposed, or the terror of encountering new fatigues and troubles, that would deter me from an acceptance;—but a belief that some other person, who had less pretence and less inclination to be excused, could execute all the duties full as satisfactorily as myself. To say more would be indiscreet; as a disclosure of a refusal before hand might incur the application of the fable, in which the fox is represented as undervaluing the grapes he could not reach. You will perceive, my dear sir, by what is here observed (and which you will be pleased to consider in the light of a confidential communication), that my inclinations will dispose and decide me to remain as I am, unless a clear and insurmountable conviction should be impressed on my mind, that some very disagreeable consequences must in all human probability result from the indulgence of my wishes."

"If I turned down the task, it would be based on a completely different principle. Despite my age, my growing enjoyment of farming activities, and my increasing love for a quiet life, which all strengthen my preference for being a private citizen, it wouldn't be any of those reasons, nor the risk to my past reputation, or the fear of facing new challenges and troubles, that would stop me from accepting; it would be the belief that someone else, who has less excuse and less desire to avoid the responsibility, could do the job just as well as I could. To say more would be unwise, as revealing my refusal beforehand might lead to the situation in the fable where the fox dismisses the grapes he couldn't reach. You'll understand, my dear sir, from what I've said (which I hope you’ll treat as a private matter), that my preferences will keep me where I am, unless I feel a strong and undeniable conviction that ignoring my wishes would lead to some serious negative consequences."

About the same time, Colonel Hamilton concluded a letter on miscellaneous subjects with the following observations. "I take it for granted, sir, you have concluded to comply with what will, no doubt, be the general call of your country in relation to the new government. You will permit me to say that it is indispensable you should lend yourself to its first operations. It is to little purpose to have introduced a system, if the weightiest influence is not given to its firm establishment in the outset."

About the same time, Colonel Hamilton wrapped up a letter on various topics with these thoughts: "I assume, sir, that you've decided to respond to what will certainly be the nationwide call regarding the new government. Please allow me to say that it's essential for you to be involved in its initial operations. It's pointless to have set up a system if its strongest support isn't provided for its solid establishment from the beginning."

"On the delicate subject," said General Washington in reply, "with which you conclude your letter, I can say nothing; because the event alluded to may never happen; and because in case it should occur, it would be a point of prudence to defer forming one's ultimate and irrevocable decision, so long as new data might be afforded for one to act with the greater wisdom and propriety. I would not wish to conceal my prevailing sentiment from you. For you know me well enough, my good sir, to be persuaded that I am not guilty of affectation, when I tell you it is my great and sole desire to live and die in peace and retirement on my own farm. Were it even indispensable a different line of conduct should be adopted, while you and some others who are acquainted with my heart would acquit, the world and posterity might probably accuse me of inconsistency and ambition. Still I hope, I shall always possess firmness and virtue enough to maintain (what I consider the most enviable of all titles) the character of an honest man."

"On the sensitive topic," General Washington replied, "that you bring up in your letter, I can’t say much; because the event you’re referring to may never happen; and if it does occur, it would be wise to hold off on making any final and irreversible decisions until we have more information to act with better judgment and correctness. I don’t want to hide my true feelings from you. You know me well enough, my good sir, to understand that I’m not pretending when I say my greatest desire is to live and die in peace and privacy on my own farm. Even if it became necessary to take a different path, while you and a few others who know my heart would understand, the world and future generations might accuse me of inconsistency and ambition. Still, I hope I will always have enough strength and integrity to maintain (what I consider the most admirable of all titles) the character of an honest man."

This answer drew from Colonel Hamilton the following reply: "I should be deeply pained, my dear sir, if your scruples in regard to a certain station should be matured into a resolution to decline it; though I am neither surprised at their existence, nor can I but agree in opinion that the caution you observe in deferring the ultimate determination is prudent. I have, however, reflected maturely on the subject, and have come to a conclusion (in which I feel no hesitation) that every public and personal consideration will demand from you an acquiescence in what will certainly be the unanimous wish of your country.

This response prompted Colonel Hamilton to say: "I would be deeply saddened, my dear sir, if your doubts about a certain position led you to decide against it; although I'm not surprised by your feelings, I agree that the caution you're showing by waiting to make a final decision is wise. However, I have thought this through carefully and I confidently believe that every public and personal factor will require you to go along with what will certainly be what your country unanimously wants."

"The absolute retreat which you meditated at the close of the late war was natural and proper. Had the government produced by the revolution gone on in a tolerable train, it would have been most adviseable to have persisted in that retreat. But I am clearly of opinion that the crisis which brought you again into public view left you no alternative but to comply; and I am equally clear in the opinion that you are by that act pledged to take a part in the execution of the government. I am not less convinced that the impression of the necessity of your filling the station in question is so universal, that you run no risk of any uncandid imputation by submitting to it. But even if this were not the case, a regard to your own reputation, as well as to the public good, calls upon you in the strongest manner to run that risk.

"The complete retreat you considered at the end of the recent war was understandable and appropriate. If the government formed by the revolution had continued in a decent manner, it would have been wise to stick with that retreat. However, I firmly believe that the situation that brought you back into the public eye left you with no choice but to comply; and I also strongly believe that you are by that action committed to playing a role in the execution of the government. I'm equally convinced that the belief in the necessity of you filling that position is so widespread that you risk no unfair criticism by agreeing to it. But even if that weren't the case, considering your own reputation and the public good strongly urges you to take that risk."

"It can not be considered as a compliment to say, that on your acceptance of the office of president, the success of the new government in its commencement may materially depend. Your agency and influence will be not less important in preserving it from the future attacks of its enemies, than they have been in recommending it in the first instance to the adoption of the people. Independent of all considerations drawn from this source, the point of light in which you stand at home and abroad, will make an infinite difference in the respectability with which the government will begin its operations, in the alternative of your being or not being at the head of it. I forbear to mention considerations which might have a more personal application. What I have said will suffice for the inferences I mean to draw.

"It shouldn't be considered a compliment to say that the success of the new government at the start may heavily rely on your acceptance of the presidency. Your role and influence will be equally crucial in protecting it from future attacks by its enemies, just as they were in initially gaining the public's support. Beyond all these considerations, your standing both at home and internationally will significantly impact the respectability with which the government will commence its operations, depending on whether you are leading it or not. I won't mention points that might be more personally relevant. What I've stated should be enough for the conclusions I aim to convey."

"First. In a matter so essential to the well being of society as the prosperity of a newly instituted government, a citizen of so much consequence as yourself to its success, has no option but to lend his services if called for. Permit me to say, it would be inglorious, in such a situation, not to hazard the glory, however great, which he might have previously acquired.

"First. In a matter as crucial to the well-being of society as the success of a newly established government, a citizen as important as you to its success has no choice but to offer his services if asked. Allow me to say, it would be shameful in such a situation not to risk the glory, no matter how great, that he may have previously earned."

"Secondly. Your signature to the proposed system, pledges your judgment for its being such an one as upon the whole was worthy of the public approbation. If it should miscarry, (as men commonly decide from success or the want of it) the blame will in all probability be laid on the system itself. And the framers of it will have to encounter the disrepute of having brought about a revolution in government, without substituting any thing that was worthy of the effort; they pulled down one Utopia, it will be said, to build up another. This view of the subject, if I mistake not, my dear sir, will suggest to your mind greater hazard to that fame, which must be, and ought to be dear to you, in refusing your future aid to the system, than in affording it. I will only add, that in my estimate of the matter, that aid is indispensable.

"Secondly, your signature on the proposed system shows that you believe it is generally worthy of public approval. If it fails (as people often judge based on success or failure), the blame will likely fall on the system itself. The creators of it will face criticism for causing a revolution in government without providing something worthwhile in return; they tore down one ideal only to create another. If I’m not mistaken, my dear sir, this perspective will make you realize that refusing to support the system poses a greater risk to your reputation—which I know you value—than offering your help. I will also add that, in my view, your support is crucial."

"I have taken the liberty to express these sentiments, and to lay before you my view of the subject. I doubt not the considerations mentioned have fully occurred to you, and I trust, they will finally produce in your mind the same result which exists in mine. I flatter myself the frankness with which I have delivered myself, will not be displeasing to you. It has been prompted by motives which you would not disapprove."

"I've taken the chance to share my thoughts and present my perspective on the matter. I am sure you've already thought about the points I mentioned, and I hope they lead you to the same conclusion I have reached. I believe that my straightforwardness in expressing myself will not upset you. My honesty comes from motives that I’m sure you would appreciate."

In answer to this letter General Washington opened himself without reserve. "In acknowledging," said he, "the receipt of your candid and kind letter by the last post, little more is incumbent on me than to thank you sincerely for the frankness with which you communicated your sentiments, and to assure you that the same manly tone of intercourse will always be more than barely welcome,—indeed it will be highly acceptable to me.

In response to this letter, General Washington expressed himself openly. "In acknowledging," he said, "the receipt of your honest and thoughtful letter from the last mail, all I need to do is sincerely thank you for the direct way you shared your thoughts, and to assure you that this same straightforward way of communication will always be more than just welcome—indeed, it will be greatly appreciated by me.

"I am particularly glad, in the present instance, that you have dealt thus freely and like a friend. Although I could not help observing from several publications and letters that my name had been sometimes spoken of, and that it was possible the contingency which is the subject of your letter might happen, yet I thought it best to maintain a guarded silence, and to lack the counsel of my best friends (which I certainly hold in the highest estimation) rather than to hazard an imputation unfriendly to the delicacy of my feelings. For, situated as I am, I could hardly bring the question into the slightest discussion, or ask an opinion even in the most confidential manner, without betraying, in my judgment, some impropriety of conduct, or without feeling an apprehension that a premature display of anxiety, might be construed into a vain glorious desire of pushing myself into notice as a candidate. Now; if I am not grossly deceived in myself, I should unfeignedly rejoice, in case the electors, by giving their votes in favour of some other person, would save me from the dreadful dilemma of being forced to accept or refuse. If that may not be, I am in the next place, earnestly desirous of searching out the truth, and of knowing whether there does not exist a probability that the government would be just as happily and effectually carried into execution without my aid, as with it. I am truly solicitous to obtain all the previous information which the circumstances will afford, and to determine (when the determination can with propriety be no longer postponed) according to the principles of right reason, and the dictates of a clear conscience; without too great a reference to the unforeseen consequences which may affect my person or reputation. Until that period, I may fairly hold myself open to conviction, though I allow your sentiments to have weight in them; and I shall not pass by your arguments without giving them as dispassionate a consideration as I can possibly bestow upon them.

I’m really glad that you’ve been so open and friendly in this situation. Even though I’ve noticed in various publications and letters that my name has come up, and that it’s possible the contingency you mentioned could happen, I thought it was better to stay quiet and not seek the advice of my closest friends (whom I truly value) to avoid any misunderstanding that might hurt my feelings. Given my situation, I could hardly bring it up even in the most private way without feeling like it would reflect poorly on my behavior, or worry that showing concern too early would seem like I was trying to put myself forward as a candidate. If I’m not seriously mistaken about myself, I would genuinely be relieved if the electors, by voting for someone else, could spare me from the terrible position of having to accept or decline. If that’s not the case, I’m also very eager to find out the truth, and to see if the government could be just as effectively run without my involvement as with it. I am truly eager to gather all the information that the circumstances provide, and to decide (when it’s appropriate to do so) based on sound reasoning and a clear conscience, without overly worrying about the unforeseen consequences for my personal life or reputation. Until then, I remain open to persuasion, though I do consider your views important; and I won’t ignore your arguments without giving them the most fair consideration I can manage.

"In taking a survey of the subject, in whatever point of light I have been able to place it, I will not suppress the acknowledgment, my dear sir, that I have always felt a kind of gloom upon my mind, as often as I have been taught to expect I might, and perhaps must ere long be called to make a decision. You will, I am well assured, believe the assertion (though I have little expectation it would gain credit from those who are less acquainted with me) that if I should receive the appointment, and should be prevailed upon to accept it; the acceptance would be attended with more diffidence and reluctance, than ever I experienced before in my life. It would be, however, with a fixed and sole determination of lending whatever assistance might be in my power to promote the public weal, in hopes that at a convenient and an early period, my services might be dispensed with; and that I might be permitted once more to retire—to pass an unclouded evening after the stormy day of life, in the bosom of domestic tranquillity."

"In reviewing the topic from every angle I could think of, I have to admit, my dear sir, that I've always felt a sense of gloom whenever I've been told to expect, and perhaps soon be required to make, a decision. I’m sure you will believe me (even though I doubt this would be accepted by those who don’t know me well) when I say that if I were to receive the appointment and was persuaded to accept it, my acceptance would come with more hesitation and reluctance than I've ever felt before. However, I would have a strong and clear commitment to do whatever I could to promote the public good, hoping that soon my services could be released, allowing me to retire once again—to enjoy a peaceful evening after the stormy day of life, surrounded by the calm of home."

This correspondence was thus closed by Colonel Hamilton. "I feel a conviction that you will finally see your acceptance to be indispensable. It is no compliment to say that no other man can sufficiently unite the public opinion, or can give the requisite weight to the office, in the commencement of the government. These considerations appear to me of themselves decisive. I am not sure that your refusal would not throw every thing into confusion. I am sure that it would have the worst effect imaginable.

This letter was then concluded by Colonel Hamilton. "I truly believe that you will ultimately realize that your acceptance is essential. It's no exaggeration to say that no one else can adequately unite public opinion or lend the necessary authority to the position at the start of the government. These factors seem decisive to me. I'm not convinced that your refusal wouldn't lead to complete chaos. I'm confident it would have the worst possible impact."

"Indeed, as I hinted in a former letter, I think circumstances leave no option."

"Surely, as I mentioned in a previous letter, I believe the situation leaves us with no choice."

Although this correspondence does not appear to have absolutely decided General Washington on the part he should embrace, it could not have been without its influence on his judgment, nor have failed to dispose him to yield to the wish of his country. "I would willingly," said he to his estimable friend General Lincoln, who had also pressed the subject on him, "pass over in silence that part of your letter, in which you mention the persons who are candidates for the two first offices in the executive, if I did not fear the omission might seem to betray a want of confidence. Motives of delicacy have prevented me hitherto from conversing or writing on this subject, whenever I could avoid it with decency. I may, however, with great sincerity, and I believe without offending against modesty or propriety, say to you, that I most heartily wish the choice to which you allude might not fall upon me: and that if it should, I must reserve to myself the right of making up my final decision, at the last moment, when it can be brought into one view, and when the expediency or inexpediency of a refusal can be more judiciously determined than at present. But be assured, my dear sir, if from any inducement I shall be persuaded ultimately to accept, it will not be (so far as I know my own heart) from any of a private or personal nature. Every personal consideration conspires, to rivet me (if I may use the expression) to retirement. At my time of life, and under my circumstances, nothing in this world can ever draw me from it, unless it be a conviction that the partiality of my countrymen had made my services absolutely necessary, joined to a fear that my refusal might induce a belief that I preferred the conservation of my own reputation and private ease, to the good of my country. After all, if I should conceive myself in a manner constrained to accept, I call heaven to witness, that this very act would be the greatest sacrifice of my personal feelings and wishes, that ever I have been called upon to make. It would be to forego repose and domestic enjoyment for trouble, perhaps for public obloquy: for I should consider myself as entering upon an unexplored field, enveloped on every side with clouds and darkness.

Although this letter doesn't seem to have completely convinced General Washington about the role he should take, it surely influenced his decision-making and made him more inclined to meet his country's wishes. "I would gladly," he told his respected friend General Lincoln, who had also urged him on this matter, "skip over that part of your letter where you mention the candidates for the top two executive positions, if I didn't worry that leaving it out might come off as lacking confidence. Delicate reasons have kept me from discussing or writing on this topic whenever I could do so politely. However, I can sincerely and, I believe, modestly tell you that I genuinely wish the choice you mentioned didn't fall on me. If it does, I need to keep the right to make my final decision at the last moment when I can assess everything at once, and when I can more wisely determine whether to accept or refuse than I can at present. But rest assured, my dear sir, if I am persuaded to accept for any reason, it won't be for any private or personal gains, as far as I know my own heart. Every personal consideration leads me, if I may say so, to seek retirement. At my age and given my situation, nothing in this world would pull me from it unless I felt that my fellow citizens truly needed my services, combined with a fear that refusing might make it seem like I prioritized my own reputation and comfort over the good of my country. Ultimately, if I believed I had no choice but to accept, I swear to heaven that this act would mark the greatest sacrifice of my personal feelings and desires that I've ever had to make. It would mean giving up peace and home enjoyment for trouble, and possibly for public criticism; for I would see myself stepping into an unknown realm, surrounded by clouds and darkness on all sides."

"From this embarrassing situation I had naturally supposed that my declarations at the close of the war would have saved me; and that my sincere intentions, then publicly made known, would have effectually precluded me forever afterwards from being looked upon as a candidate for any office. This hope, as a last anchor of worldly happiness in old age, I had still carefully preserved; until the public papers and private letters from my correspondents in almost every quarter, taught me to apprehend that I might soon be obliged to answer the question, whether I would go again into public life or not?"

"From this awkward situation, I had naturally thought that my statements at the end of the war would have protected me; and that my genuine intentions, which I had made clear at the time, would have effectively kept me from being considered a candidate for any office in the future. This hope, as my last lifeline for happiness in old age, I had still held onto carefully; until the newspapers and private letters from contacts in nearly every area made me realize that I might soon have to address the question of whether I would return to public life or not."

"I can say little or nothing new," said he in a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette, "in consequence of the repetition of your opinion on the expediency there will be, for my accepting the office to which you refer. Your sentiments indeed coincide much more nearly with those of my ether friends, than with my own feelings. In truth, my difficulties increase and magnify as I draw towards the period, when, according to the common belief, it will be necessary for me to give a definitive answer in one way or other. Should circumstances render it, in a manner, inevitably necessary to be in the affirmative, be assured, my dear sir, I shall assume the task with the most unfeigned reluctance, and with a real diffidence, for which I shall probably receive no credit from the world. If I know my own heart, nothing short of a conviction of duty will induce me again to take an active part in public affairs. And in that case, if I can form a plan for my own conduct, my endeavours shall be unremittingly exerted (even at the hazard of former fame or present popularity) to extricate my country from the embarrassments in which it is entangled through want of credit; and to establish a general system of policy, which, if pursued, will ensure permanent felicity to the commonwealth. I think I see a path, as clear and as direct as a ray of light, which leads to the attainment of that object. Nothing but harmony, honesty, industry, and frugality, are necessary to make us a great and happy people. Happily, the present posture of affairs, and the prevailing disposition of my countrymen, promise to co-operate in establishing those four great and essential pillars of public felicity."

"I can say very little that's new," he wrote in a letter to the Marquis de Lafayette, "because you keep repeating your thoughts on whether I should accept the position you mentioned. Your views really align much more closely with those of my other friends than with my own feelings. Honestly, my difficulties just keep piling up as I get closer to the time when, as everyone believes, I'll need to give a definite answer one way or another. If it turns out that circumstances make it almost unavoidable for me to say yes, know this, my dear sir: I will take on the task with genuine reluctance and a true sense of uncertainty, for which I probably won’t get any credit from the world. If I understand my own heart, only a strong sense of duty will convince me to get involved in public affairs again. And if that happens, if I can figure out a plan for how to act, I will work tirelessly (even at the risk of my past fame or current popularity) to pull my country out of the troubles it's facing due to lack of credit; and to establish a general policy that, if followed, will bring lasting happiness to the nation. I believe I see a path that's as clear and straight as a ray of light, leading us to that goal. All we need are harmony, honesty, hard work, and frugality to make us a great and happy people. Fortunately, the current state of things and the outlook of my fellow citizens seem poised to help establish those four essential pillars of public happiness."

 

The Room in Which the First Constitutional Convention Met in Philadelphia

The Room Where the First Constitutional Convention Met in Philadelphia

Delegates from twelve of the thirteen States (Rhode Island alone being unrepresented) assembled at Philadelphia, where the opening sessions of the first Constitutional Convention were held in this room in Independence Hall, May 14, 1787. George Washington presided during the four months taken to draft the Constitution of the United States. When it was completed on September 17th, it is said that many of the delegates seemed awe-struck and that Washington himself sat with his head bowed in deep meditation. As the Convention adjourned, Franklin, who was then over eighty-one years of age, arose and pointing to the President's quaint armchair on the back of which was emblazoned a half sun, brilliant with gilded rays, observed: "As I have been sitting here all these weeks, I have often wondered whether yonder sun is rising or setting, but now I know that it is a rising sun."

Delegates from twelve of the thirteen states (with Rhode Island not represented) gathered in Philadelphia for the opening sessions of the first Constitutional Convention in this room at Independence Hall on May 14, 1787. George Washington led the convention, which took four months to draft the United States Constitution. When it was finished on September 17th, many delegates appeared awestruck, and Washington himself sat with his head bowed in deep thought. As the convention wrapped up, Franklin, who was over eighty-one at the time, stood up and pointed to the President's unique armchair, which had a half sun with golden rays on the back, and remarked: "As I've been sitting here these weeks, I've often wondered if that sun is rising or setting, but now I know it's a rising sun."

 

He is unanimously elected president.

After the elections had taken place, a general persuasion prevailed that the public will, respecting the chief magistrate of the union, had been too unequivocally manifested not to be certainly obeyed; and several applications were made to General Washington for those offices in the respective states, which would be in the gift of the president of the United States.

After the elections happened, there was a widespread belief that the people's choice for the leader of the country was too clear to ignore; as a result, many people reached out to General Washington for the positions in their states that the president of the United States could appoint.

As marking the frame of mind with which he came into the government, the following extract is given from one of the many letters written to persons whose pretensions he was disposed to favour. "Should it become absolutely necessary for me to occupy the station in which your letter presupposes me, I have determined to go into it, perfectly free from all engagements of every nature whatsoever.—A conduct in conformity to this resolution, would enable me, in balancing the various pretensions of different candidates for appointments, to act with a sole reference to justice and the public good. This is, in substance, the answer that I have given to all applications (and they are not few) which have already been made. Among the places sought after in these applications, I must not conceal that the office to which you particularly allude is comprehended. This fact I tell you merely as matter of information. My general manner of thinking, as to the propriety of holding myself totally disengaged, will apologize for my not enlarging farther on the subject.

As a reflection of the mindset with which he entered the government, here's an excerpt from one of the many letters he wrote to people he was inclined to support. "If it becomes absolutely necessary for me to take on the role your letter assumes I will, I have decided to do so completely free from any commitments of any kind. Acting according to this principle would allow me to consider the various claims of different candidates for positions purely based on fairness and the public good. This is essentially the response I have given to all requests (and there have been quite a few) that have already been submitted. Among the positions being sought in these requests, I should mention that the office you specifically refer to is included. I'm sharing this information just to keep you informed. My overall perspective on the importance of remaining entirely uncommitted explains why I won't go into more detail on the topic."

"Though I am sensible that the public suffrage which places a man in office, should prevent him from being swayed, in the execution of it, by his private inclinations, yet he may assuredly, without violating his duty, be indulged in the continuance of his former attachments."

"While I understand that the public vote that puts a person in office should keep them from being influenced by their personal feelings in carrying out their responsibilities, they can certainly, without neglecting their duty, maintain their previous connections."

Meeting of the first congress.

The impotence of the late government, added to the dilatoriness inseparable from its perplexed mode of proceeding on the public business, and to its continued session, had produced among the members of congress such an habitual disregard of punctuality in their attendance on that body, that, although the new government was to commence its operations on the 4th of March, 1789, a house of representatives was not formed until the first, nor a senate until the 6th day of April.

The ineffectiveness of the former government, combined with the delays that came with its complicated approach to public affairs and its ongoing sessions, led Congress members to develop a routine disregard for showing up on time. As a result, even though the new government was set to begin on March 4, 1789, a House of Representatives wasn't established until the 1st, and a Senate wasn't formed until April 6th.

At length, the votes for the president and vice president of the United States were opened and counted in the senate. Neither the animosity of parties, nor the preponderance of the enemies of the new government in some of the states, could deprive General Washington of a single vote. By the unanimous voice of an immense continent, he was called to the chief magistracy of the nation. The second number of votes was given to Mr. John Adams. George Washington and John Adams were therefore declared to be duly elected president and vice president of the United States, to serve for four years from the 4th of March, 1789.[41]

At last, the votes for the president and vice president of the United States were opened and counted in the Senate. Neither the hostility of the parties nor the strength of the opponents of the new government in some states could take away a single vote from General Washington. With the unanimous support of a vast nation, he was chosen as the leader of the country. The second highest number of votes went to Mr. John Adams. George Washington and John Adams were thus officially elected as president and vice president of the United States, set to serve for four years starting March 4, 1789.[41]


CHAPTER V.

The election of General Washington officially announced to him.... His departure for the seat of government.... Marks of affection shown him on his journey.... His inauguration and speech to Congress.... His system of intercourse with the world.... Letters on this and other subjects.... Answer of both houses of Congress to the speech.... Domestic and foreign relations of the United States.... Debates on the impost and tonnage bills.... On the power of removal from office.... On the policy of the secretary of the treasury reporting plans of revenue.... On the style of the President.... Amendments to the constitution.... Appointment of executive officers, and of the judges.... Adjournment of the first session of Congress.... The President visits New England.... His reception.... North Carolina accedes to the union.

The election of General Washington formally informed him.... His departure for the capital.... The signs of affection shown to him during his journey.... His inauguration and address to Congress.... His approach to international relations.... Correspondence on this and other topics.... The response from both houses of Congress to the address.... Domestic and foreign relationships of the United States.... Discussions about the import and tonnage bills.... Regarding the power to remove officials.... On the secretary of the treasury's policy of presenting revenue plans.... On the President's style.... Amendments to the Constitution.... The appointment of executive officers and judges.... The adjournment of the first session of Congress.... The President travels to New England.... His reception.... North Carolina joins the union.

 

1789
The election of General Washington officially announced to him.

The election of General Washington to the office of chief magistrate of the United States, was announced to him at Mount Vernon on the 14th of April, 1789. Accustomed to respect the wishes of his fellow citizens, he did not think himself at liberty to decline an appointment conferred upon him by the suffrage of an entire people. His acceptance of it, and his expressions of gratitude for this fresh proof of the esteem and confidence of his country, were connected with declarations of diffidence in himself. "I wish," he said, "that there may not be reason for regretting the choice,—for indeed, all I can promise, is to accomplish that which can be done by an honest zeal."

The election of General Washington as the chief leader of the United States was announced to him at Mount Vernon on April 14, 1789. Understanding the importance of public opinion, he felt he couldn’t refuse a role given to him by the vote of the people. In accepting the position, he expressed gratitude for this new sign of his country’s respect and trust, while also showing uncertainty about his abilities. "I hope," he said, "that there won't be any reason to regret the choice—because honestly, all I can promise is to do my best with sincere effort."

His departure for the seat of government.

As the public business required the immediate attendance of the president at the seat of government, he hastened his departure; and, on the second day after receiving notice of his appointment, took leave of Mount Vernon.

As public affairs needed the president to be present at the government center, he quickly prepared to leave; and, two days after being notified of his appointment, he said goodbye to Mount Vernon.

In an entry made by himself in his diary, the feelings inspired by an occasion so affecting to his mind are thus described, "About ten o'clock I bade adieu to Mount Vernon, to private life, and to domestic felicity; and with a mind oppressed with more anxious and painful sensations than I have words to express, set out for New York in company with Mr. Thompson, and Colonel Humphries, with the best dispositions to render service to my country in obedience to its call, but with less hope of answering its expectations."

In a personal diary entry, he described the emotions stirred by such a significant moment: "Around ten o'clock, I said goodbye to Mount Vernon, to my private life, and to my happiness at home; and with a heavy heart filled with more anxiety and pain than I can express, I headed to New York with Mr. Thompson and Colonel Humphries, fully intending to serve my country in response to its call, but with little hope of meeting its expectations."

Marks of respect and affection shown him on his journey.

He was met by a number of gentlemen residing in Alexandria, and escorted to their city, where a public dinner had been prepared to which he was invited. The sentiments of veneration and affection which were felt by all classes of his fellow citizens for their patriot chief, were manifested by the most flattering marks of heartfelt respect; and by addresses which evinced the unlimited confidence reposed in his virtues and his talents. A place can not be given to these addresses: but that from the citizens of Alexandria derives such pretensions to particular notice from the recollection that it is to be considered as an effusion from the hearts of his neighbours and private friends, that its insertion may be pardoned. It is in the following words:

He was welcomed by several gentlemen living in Alexandria and taken to their city, where a public dinner had been arranged for him. Everyone in the community, regardless of their status, showed their deep respect and admiration for their patriotic leader through sincere gestures of respect and speeches that demonstrated their complete trust in his character and abilities. While we can't include all of these speeches, the one from the citizens of Alexandria deserves special mention because it comes from the hearts of his neighbors and friends, so we'll include it. It goes like this:

"Again your country commands your care. Obedient to its wishes, unmindful of your ease, we see you again relinquishing the bliss of retirement; and this too at a period of life, when nature itself seems to authorize a preference of repose!

"Once again, your country needs your attention. Following its demands, ignoring your comfort, we see you giving up the happiness of rest; and this is happening at a time in life when nature itself seems to encourage taking a break!"

"Not to extol your glory as a soldier; not to pour forth our gratitude for past services; not to acknowledge the justice of the unexampled honour which has been conferred upon you by the spontaneous and unanimous suffrages of three millions of freemen, in your election to the supreme magistracy; nor to admire the patriotism which directs your conduct, do your neighbours and friends now address you. Themes less splendid but more endearing, impress our minds. The first and best of citizens must leave us: our aged must lose their ornament; our youth their model; our agriculture its improver; our commerce its friend; our infant academy its protector; our poor their benefactor; and the interior navigation of the Potomac (an event replete with the most extensive utility, already, by your unremitted exertions, brought into partial use) its institutor and promoter.

"Not to praise your achievements as a soldier; not to express our gratitude for past services; not to acknowledge the fairness of the extraordinary honor that has been given to you by the spontaneous and unanimous votes of three million free people in your election to the highest office; nor to admire the patriotism that guides your actions, do your neighbors and friends now come to you. More personal but less grand themes occupy our thoughts. The first and finest of citizens must leave us: our elders will lose their pride; our youth their role model; our farming its benefactor; our trade its ally; our young academy its supporter; our less fortunate their helper; and the internal navigation of the Potomac (an endeavor full of great benefit, already partially implemented through your tireless efforts) its creator and promoter."

"Farewell!—go! and make a grateful people happy, a people, who will be doubly grateful when they contemplate this recent sacrifice for their interest.

"Goodbye!—go! and make a thankful people happy, a people who will be even more grateful when they think about this recent sacrifice for their benefit."

"To that Being who maketh and unmaketh at his will, we commend you; and after the accomplishment of the arduous business to which you are called, may he restore to us again, the best of men, and the most beloved fellow citizen!"

"To the Being who creates and destroys at his discretion, we entrust you; and after the completion of the challenging task ahead of you, may he bring back to us the finest of men and our most cherished fellow citizen!"

To this affectionate address General Washington returned the following answer:

To this heartfelt message, General Washington responded with the following answer:

"Gentlemen,

"Guys,"

"Although I ought not to conceal, yet I can not describe the painful emotions which I felt in being called upon to determine whether I would accept or refuse the presidency of the United States. The unanimity in the choice, the opinion of my friends communicated from different parts of Europe, as well as from America, the apparent wish of those who were not entirely satisfied with the constitution in its present form; and an ardent desire on my own part to be instrumental in connecting the good will of my countrymen towards each other, have induced an acceptance. Those who know me best (and you my fellow citizens are, from your situation, in that number) know better than any others, my love of retirement is so great, that no earthly consideration, short of a conviction of duty, could have prevailed upon me to depart from my resolution, 'never more to take any share in transactions of a public nature.' For, at my age, and in my circumstances, what prospects or advantages could I propose to myself, from embarking again on the tempestuous and uncertain ocean of public life?

"Although I shouldn’t hide it, I can’t fully express the painful emotions I felt when I was asked to decide whether to accept or decline the presidency of the United States. The unanimous choice, the opinions of my friends from different parts of Europe as well as America, the apparent wish of those who weren’t completely happy with the constitution in its current form, and my strong desire to help foster goodwill among my fellow citizens all led me to accept. Those who know me well (and you, my fellow citizens, are among them due to your circumstances) understand my deep love of privacy, so much so that no earthly reason, other than a sense of duty, could compel me to go against my resolution of 'never again taking part in public affairs.' At my age and with my situation, what prospects or benefits could I expect from diving back into the tumultuous and unpredictable waters of public life?"

"I do not feel myself under the necessity of making public declarations, in order to convince you, gentlemen, of my attachment to yourselves, and regard for your interests. The whole tenor of my life has been open to your inspection; and my past actions, rather than my present declarations, must be the pledge of my future conduct.

"I don’t feel the need to make public statements to convince you, gentlemen, of my loyalty to you and my concern for your interests. My whole life has been transparent to you, and my past actions, rather than my current statements, should be the assurance of my future behavior."

"In the mean time, I thank you most sincerely for the expressions of kindness contained in your valedictory address. It is true, just after having bade adieu to my domestic connexions, this tender proof of your friendships is but too well calculated still further to awaken my sensibility, and increase my regret at parting from the enjoyments of private life.

"In the meantime, I sincerely thank you for the kind words in your farewell speech. It's true that after saying goodbye to my family and close friends, this heartfelt gesture from you only makes me feel even more emotional and increases my sadness about leaving the pleasures of private life."

"All that now remains for me is to commit myself and you to the protection of that beneficent Being who, on a former occasion, hath happily brought us together, after a long and distressing separation. Perhaps, the same gracious Providence will again indulge me. Unutterable sensations must then be left to more expressive silence; while from an aching heart, I bid you all, my affectionate friends, and kind neighbours, farewell!"

"All that’s left for me now is to entrust myself and you to the care of that wonderful Being who, in the past, has happily reunited us after a long and painful time apart. Maybe that same kind Providence will be generous with me again. I can’t put into words the feelings that must now remain in silence; with a heavy heart, I say goodbye to you all, my dear friends, and kind neighbors!"

In the afternoon of the same day, he left Alexandria, and was attended by his neighbours to Georgetown, where a number of citizens from the state of Maryland had assembled to receive him.

In the afternoon of the same day, he left Alexandria and was accompanied by his neighbors to Georgetown, where several citizens from the state of Maryland had gathered to welcome him.

Throughout his journey the people continued to manifest the same feeling. Crowds flocked around him wherever he stopped; and corps of militia, and companies of the most respectable citizens, escorted him through their respective streets. At Philadelphia, he was received with peculiar splendour. Gray's bridge, over the Schuylkill, was highly decorated. In imitation of the triumphal exhibitions of ancient Rome, an arch, composed of laurel, in which was displayed the simple elegance of true taste, was erected at each end of it, and on each side was a laurel shrubbery. As the object of universal admiration passed under the arch, a civic crown was, unperceived by him, let down upon his head by a youth ornamented with sprigs of laurel, who was assisted by machinery. The fields and avenues leading from the Schuylkill to Philadelphia, were crowded with people, through whom General Washington was conducted into the city by a numerous and respectable body of citizens; and at night the town was illuminated. The next day, at Trenton, he was welcomed in a manner as new as it was pleasing. In addition to the usual demonstrations of respect and attachment which were given by the discharge of cannon, by military corps, and by private persons of distinction, the gentler sex prepared in their own taste, a tribute of applause indicative of the grateful recollection in which they held their deliverance twelve years before from a formidable enemy. On the bridge over the creek which passes through the town, was erected a triumphal arch highly ornamented with laurels and flowers: and supported by thirteen pillars, each entwined with wreaths of evergreen. On the front arch was inscribed in large gilt letters,

Throughout his journey, people continued to show the same enthusiasm. Crowds gathered around him wherever he stopped, and groups of militia and respectable citizens escorted him through their streets. In Philadelphia, he was welcomed with remarkable grandeur. Gray's Bridge, over the Schuylkill, was beautifully decorated. Mimicking the triumphal displays of ancient Rome, an arch made of laurel that showcased the simple elegance of true taste was erected at each end, with laurel shrubs on each side. As the object of universal admiration walked under the arch, a civic crown was, unnoticed by him, lowered onto his head by a youth adorned with sprigs of laurel, aided by machinery. The fields and streets leading from the Schuylkill to Philadelphia were filled with people, through whom General Washington made his way into the city, accompanied by a large and respectable group of citizens; the town was illuminated that night. The next day in Trenton, he was welcomed in a way that was both new and delightful. In addition to the customary displays of respect and affection shown through cannon fire, military corps, and distinguished citizens, the women prepared their own tribute of applause, reflecting their gratitude for the liberation they experienced twelve years earlier from a formidable foe. On the bridge over the creek that runs through the town, a triumphal arch was erected, richly adorned with laurel and flowers, supported by thirteen pillars, each entwined with evergreen wreaths. The front arch was inscribed in large gilt letters,

THE DEFENDER OF THE MOTHERS

THE PROTECTOR OF MOTHERS

WILL BE THE

WILL BE THE

PROTECTOR OF THE DAUGHTERS.

Daughters' Protector.

On the centre of the arch above the inscription, was a dome or cupola of flowers and evergreens, encircling the dates of two memorable events which were peculiarly interesting to New Jersey. The first was the battle of Trenton, and the second the bold and judicious stand made by the American troops at the same creek, by which the progress of the British army was arrested on the evening preceding the battle of Princeton.

On the center of the arch above the inscription, there was a dome or cupola made of flowers and evergreens, surrounding the dates of two significant events that were especially important to New Jersey. The first was the battle of Trenton, and the second was the brave and wise stance taken by the American troops at the same creek, which stopped the advance of the British army on the evening before the battle of Princeton.

At this place, he was met by a party of matrons leading their daughters dressed in white, who carried baskets of flowers in their hands, and sang, with exquisite sweetness, an ode of two stanzas composed for the occasion.

At this location, he was welcomed by a group of women with their daughters dressed in white, who held baskets of flowers and sang, with beautiful sweetness, a two-stanza ode written for the occasion.

At Brunswick, he was joined by the governor of New Jersey, who accompanied him to Elizabethtown Point. A committee of congress received him on the road, and conducted him with military parade to the Point, where he took leave of the governor and other gentlemen of Jersey, and embarked for New York in an elegant barge of thirteen oars, manned by thirteen branch pilots prepared for the purpose by the citizens of New York.

At Brunswick, he was joined by the governor of New Jersey, who went with him to Elizabethtown Point. A congressional committee met him on the way and escorted him with a military parade to the Point, where he said goodbye to the governor and other gentlemen from Jersey, and then boarded an elegant thirteen-oar barge, rowed by thirteen branch pilots provided by the citizens of New York, for his trip to New York.

"The display of boats," says the general, in his private journal, "which attended and joined on this occasion, some with vocal, and others with instrumental music on board, the decorations of the ships, the roar of cannon, and the loud acclamations of the people, which rent the sky as I passed along the wharves, filled my mind with sensations as painful (contemplating the reverse of this scene, which may be the case after all my labours to do good) as they were pleasing."

"The sight of the boats," the general writes in his private journal, "that came to join us this time, some playing music with voices and others with instruments, the decorated ships, the cannon fire, and the cheers of the crowd that echoed in the sky as I walked along the wharves, filled me with feelings as painful (thinking about the opposite of this scene, which could be the outcome after all my efforts to do good) as they were enjoyable."

At the stairs on Murray's wharf, which had been prepared and ornamented for the purpose, he was received by the governor of New York, and conducted with military honours, through an immense concourse of people, to the apartments provided for him. These were attended by all who were in office, and by many private citizens of distinction, who pressed around him to offer their congratulations, and to express the joy which glowed in their bosoms at seeing the man in whom all confided, at the head of the American empire. This day of extravagant joy was succeeded by a splendid illumination.

At the stairs on Murray's wharf, which had been decorated for the occasion, he was welcomed by the governor of New York and escorted with military honors through a huge crowd of people to the rooms set up for him. These were filled with all the officials and many distinguished private citizens who gathered around him to offer their congratulations and express their excitement at seeing the man everyone trusted at the helm of the American empire. This day of overwhelming joy was followed by a spectacular display of lights.

It is no equivocal mark of the worth of Washington, and of the soundness of his judgment, that it could neither be corrupted nor misguided by these flattering testimonials of attachment.

It’s a clear indication of Washington's value and the soundness of his judgment that he could not be swayed or misled by these flattering expressions of loyalty.

Two days before the arrival of the President, the Vice President took his seat in the senate, and addressed that body in a dignified speech adapted to the occasion, in which, after manifesting the high opinion that statesman always entertained of his countrymen, he thus expressed his sentiments of the executive magistrate.

Two days before the President arrived, the Vice President took his seat in the senate and delivered a dignified speech appropriate for the occasion, in which he shared his high regard for his fellow citizens and expressed his thoughts about the executive leader.

"It is with satisfaction that I congratulate the people of America on the formation of a national constitution, and the fair prospect of a consistent administration of a government of laws: on the acquisition of a house of representatives, chosen by themselves; of a senate thus composed by their own state legislatures; and on the prospect of an executive authority, in the hands of one whose portrait I shall not presume to draw.—Were I blessed with powers to do justice to his character, it would be impossible to increase the confidence or affection of his country, or make the smallest addition to his glory. This can only be effected by a discharge of the present exalted trust on the same principles, with the same abilities and virtues which have uniformly appeared in all his former conduct, public or private. May I nevertheless be indulged to inquire, if we look over the catalogue of the first magistrates of nations, whether they have been denominated presidents or consuls, kings, or princes, where shall we find one, whose commanding talents and virtues, whose overruling good fortune, have so completely united all hearts and voices in his favour? who enjoyed the esteem and admiration of foreign nations, and fellow citizens, with equal unanimity? qualities so uncommon, are no common blessings to the country that possesses them. By these great qualities, and their benign effects, has Providence marked out the head of this nation, with a hand so distinctly visible, as to have been seen by all men, and mistaken by none."

"I am pleased to congratulate the people of America on the establishment of a national constitution and the promising chance for a consistent government of laws. We now have a House of Representatives elected by the people and a Senate made up of members chosen by their state legislatures, along with the hope of an executive authority in the hands of someone whose character I won’t attempt to describe. If I had the ability to truly capture his character, it would be impossible to enhance the trust or affection of his country or add to his glory. This can only be achieved by performing the current high position with the same principles, abilities, and virtues that have consistently been evident in all his past actions, both public and private. However, may I be allowed to ask, if we review the list of first leaders of nations, whether they are called presidents, consuls, kings, or princes, where can we find one whose remarkable talents and virtues, whose extraordinary good fortune, have so completely united everyone in his favor? Who has enjoyed the respect and admiration of both foreign nations and fellow citizens with such unanimous support? Such rare qualities are not ordinary blessings for the country that possesses them. Through these great qualities and their positive effects, Providence has clearly marked the leader of this nation in a way that is visible to all and cannot be misunderstood."

 

Washington Taking the Oath of Office

Washington Taking the Oath of Office

From the painting by Alonzo Chappell

From the artwork by Alonzo Chappell

On the balcony of the old City Hall, Broad and Wall Streets, New York, Washington was sworn in as first President of the United States, April 30, 1789. The artist here accurately depicts him wearing a suit of dark brown, at his side a dress sword, and his hair powdered in the fashion of the period. White silk stockings and shoes with simple silver buckles completed his attire. On one side of him stood Chancellor Livingstone, who administered the oath. On the other side was Vice-President John Adams. Washington solemnly repeated the words of the oath, clearly enunciating, "I swear": adding in a whisper, with closed eyes, "So help me, God".

On the balcony of the old City Hall at Broad and Wall Streets in New York, Washington was sworn in as the first President of the United States on April 30, 1789. The artist accurately shows him wearing a dark brown suit, a dress sword at his side, and his hair styled in the fashion of the time. He completed his outfit with white silk stockings and shoes that had simple silver buckles. On one side of him was Chancellor Livingstone, who administered the oath, and on the other side was Vice-President John Adams. Washington solemnly repeated the words of the oath, clearly stating, “I swear,” then added in a whisper with his eyes closed, “So help me, God.”

 

He forms a system of conduct to be observed in his intercourse with the world.

A President of the United States being a new political personage, to a great portion of whose time the public was entitled, it became proper to digest a system of conduct to be observed in his intercourse with the world, which would keep in view the duties of his station, without entirely disregarding his personal accommodation, or the course of public opinion. In the interval between his arrival in New York, and entering on the duties of his office, those most capable of advising on the subject were consulted; and some rules were framed by General Washington for his government in these respects. As one of them, the allotment of a particular hour for receiving visits not on business, became the subject of much animadversion; and, being considered merely as an imitation of the levee days established by crowned heads, has constituted not the least important of the charges which have been made against this gentleman. The motives assigned by himself for the rule may not be unworthy of attention.

A President of the United States, being a new figure in politics, had a significant amount of his time claimed by the public. It became important to establish a system of behavior for his interactions with the world that respected his responsibilities while also considering his personal comfort and public opinion. During the time between his arrival in New York and the start of his official duties, he consulted with those best qualified to advise him. General Washington established some guidelines for his conduct in this regard. One of these guidelines was setting aside a specific hour for receiving non-business visits, which drew a lot of criticism. It was seen as merely copying the levee days of monarchs, and it became one of the main accusations against him. The reasons he gave for this rule may deserve attention.

Letters from him on this and other subjects.

Not long after the government came into operation, Doctor Stuart, a gentleman nearly connected with the President in friendship and by marriage, addressed to him a letter stating the accusations which were commonly circulating in Virginia on various subjects, and especially against the regal manners of those who administered the affairs of the nation. In answer to this letter the President observed, "while the eyes of America, perhaps of the world, are turned to this government, and many are watching the movements of all those who are concerned in its administration, I should like to be informed, through so good a medium, of the public opinion of both men and measures, and of none more than myself;—not so much of what may be thought commendable parts, if any, of my conduct, as of those which are conceived to be of a different complexion. The man who means to commit no wrong will never be guilty of enormities, consequently can never be unwilling to learn what are ascribed to him as foibles.—If they are really such, the knowledge of them in a well disposed mind will go half way towards a reform.—If they are not errors, he can explain and justify the motives of his actions.

Not long after the government began its operations, Doctor Stuart, a man closely connected to the President through friendship and family ties, wrote him a letter outlining the accusations that were commonly being circulated in Virginia on various topics, particularly about the royal demeanor of those running the country's affairs. In response to this letter, the President remarked, "While the eyes of America, and perhaps even the world, are focused on this government and many people are observing the actions of those involved in its administration, I would like to learn, through such a reliable source, what the public thinks about both individuals and policies, especially regarding myself;—not so much about the parts of my conduct that may be considered praiseworthy, if any, but rather those seen as less favorable. A person who intends to do no wrong will never commit serious offenses and will always be open to understanding what is said about his shortcomings.—If they are indeed such, knowing about them with a good mindset will go a long way toward making improvements.—If they are not mistakes, he can clarify and justify the motives behind his actions."

"At a distance from the theatre of action, truth is not always related without embellishment, and sometimes is entirely perverted from a misconception of the causes which produced the effects that are the subject of censure.

"From afar, the truth isn't always told clearly; it can be exaggerated or completely twisted due to misunderstandings about the reasons behind the consequences that are being criticized."

"This leads me to think that a system which I found it indispensably necessary to adopt upon my first coming to this city, might have undergone severe strictures, and have had motives very foreign from those that governed me, assigned as causes thereof.—I mean first, returning no visits: second, appointing certain days to receive them generally (not to the exclusion however of visits on any other days under particular circumstances;) and third, at first entertaining no company, and afterwards (until I was unable to entertain any at all) confining it to official characters. A few days evinced the necessity of the two first in so clear a point of view, that had I not adopted it, I should have been unable to have attended to any sort of business, unless I had applied the hours allotted to rest and refreshment to this purpose; for by the time I had done breakfast, and thence until dinner—and afterwards until bed-time, I could not get relieved from the ceremony of one visit before I had to attend to another. In a word, I had no leisure to read or to answer the despatches that were pouring in upon me from all quarters."

"This makes me think that a system I found absolutely necessary when I first arrived in this city could have faced harsh criticism, with motivations very different from mine being suggested as reasons for it. First, I decided to not return any visits; second, I designated specific days for receiving visits generally (though I wasn't excluding visits on other days in special circumstances); and third, at first I didn't entertain any guests, and later on (until I could no longer host anyone) I restricted it to official visitors. After a few days, the need for the first two became so clear that if I hadn't adopted them, I wouldn't have been able to focus on any business, unless I sacrificed the time meant for rest and refreshment for that purpose. By the time I finished breakfast, from then until dinner—and after that until bedtime—I couldn't escape the formality of one visit before I had to deal with another. In short, I had no time to read or respond to the deluge of correspondence coming in from all directions."

In a subsequent letter written to the same gentleman, after his levees had been openly-censured by the enemies of his administration, he thus expressed himself:

In a later letter to the same gentleman, after his receptions had been publicly criticized by the opponents of his administration, he said this:

"Before the custom was established, which now accommodates foreign characters, strangers, and others who from motives of curiosity, respect to the chief magistrate, or any other cause, are induced to call upon me, I was unable to attend to any business whatsoever. For gentlemen, consulting their own convenience rather than mine, were calling from the time I rose from breakfast—often before—until I sat down to dinner. This, as I resolved not to neglect my public duties, reduced me to the choice of one of these alternatives; either to refuse them altogether, or to appropriate a time for the reception of them. The first would, I well knew, be disgusting to many;—the latter I expected, would undergo animadversion from those who would find fault with or without cause. To please every body was impossible. I therefore adopted that line of conduct which combined public advantage with private convenience, and which, in my judgment, was unexceptionable in itself.

"Before the custom was established that now allows for visits from foreign dignitaries, strangers, and others motivated by curiosity, respect for the chief magistrate, or other reasons to meet with me, I couldn't manage any business at all. Gentlemen would come to see me based on their schedules rather than mine, starting from the moment I finished breakfast—often even before—until I sat down for dinner. Since I was determined not to neglect my public duties, I had to choose between two options: either decline all visitors or set aside specific time for them. I knew the first option would disappoint many, while the second would likely draw criticism from those who would complain regardless of the reason. It was impossible to satisfy everyone. So, I chose a course of action that balanced public benefit with my own convenience, which I believed was reasonable in itself."

"These visits are optional. They are made without invitation. Between the hours of three and four every Tuesday, I am prepared to receive them. Gentlemen, often in great numbers, come and go;—chat with each other;—and act as they please. A porter shows them into the room; and they retire from it when they choose, and without ceremony. At their first entrance, they salute me, and I them, and as many as I can talk to, I do. What pomp there is in all this I am unable to discover. Perhaps it consists in not sitting. To this two reasons are opposed: first, it is unusual; secondly, (which is a more substantial one) because I have no room large enough to contain a third of the chairs which would be sufficient to admit it. If it is supposed that ostentation, or the fashions of courts (which by the by I believe originate oftener in convenience, not to say necessity, than is generally imagined) gave rise to this custom, I will boldly affirm that no supposition was ever more erroneous; for were I to indulge my inclinations, every moment that I could withdraw from the fatigues of my station should be spent in retirement. That they are not, proceeds from the sense I entertain of the propriety of giving to every one as free access as consists with that respect which is due to the chair of government;—and that respect, I conceive, is neither to be acquired nor preserved, but by maintaining a just medium between too much state, and too great familiarity.

"These visits are optional and come without invitation. Every Tuesday between three and four, I’m ready to welcome them. Gentlemen, often in large groups, come and go; they chat with one another and do as they please. A porter directs them into the room, and they leave whenever they like, without any formalities. When they first enter, they greet me, and I return the greeting, and I talk to as many of them as I can. I can't find any real grandeur in this. Perhaps it lies in not sitting down. There are two reasons against that: first, it's unusual; and second, and more importantly, I don’t have a room large enough for a third of the chairs needed to accommodate it. If anyone thinks that pretentiousness or courtly fashions (which I believe usually come from convenience, if not necessity, more than commonly thought) brought about this custom, I will confidently say that no assumption could be more wrong; because if I followed my own wishes, I would spend every moment I could away from the demands of my position in solitude. The reason I don't is because I feel it's proper to allow everyone as much access as is consistent with the respect due to the office of governance; and I believe that respect can only be maintained by finding a balance between too much formality and too much familiarity."

"Similar to the above, but of a more familiar and sociable kind, are the visits every Friday afternoon to Mrs. Washington, where I always am. These public meetings, and a dinner once a week to as many as my table will hold, with the references to and from the different departments of state, and other communications with all parts of the union, is as much if not more than I am able to undergo; for I have already had within less than a year, two severe attacks;—the last worse than the first,—a third, it is more than probable will put me to sleep with my fathers—at what distance this may be, I know not."

"Similar to the one above, but more friendly and social, are the visits every Friday afternoon to Mrs. Washington, where I always am. These public gatherings, along with a dinner once a week for as many people as my table can accommodate, along with communication to and from different departments of state and other correspondence from all parts of the union, is more than I can handle; I've already had two serious health issues in less than a year—the last one worse than the first—and a third might just be the end for me. I don’t know when that might be."

His inauguration and speech to congress.

The ceremonies of the inauguration having been adjusted by congress, the President attended in the senate chamber, on the 30th of April, in order to take, in the presence of both houses, the oath prescribed by the constitution.

The inauguration ceremonies organized by Congress took place, and the President attended in the Senate chamber on April 30th to take the oath required by the Constitution in front of both houses.

To gratify the public curiosity, an open gallery adjoining the senate chamber had been selected by congress, as the place in which the oath should be administered. Having taken it in the view of an immense concourse of people, whose loud and repeated acclamations attested the joy with which his being proclaimed President of the United States inspired them, he returned to the senate chamber, where he delivered the following address:

To satisfy the public's curiosity, Congress chose an open gallery next to the Senate chamber as the location for administering the oath. After taking the oath in front of a huge crowd, whose loud and repeated cheers showed their joy at his being declared President of the United States, he returned to the Senate chamber, where he delivered the following address:

"Fellow citizens of the Senate and of the House of Representatives:

Fellow citizens of the Senate and the House of Representatives:

"Among the vicissitudes incident to life, no event could have filled me with greater anxieties than that of which the notification was transmitted by your order, and received on the 14th day of the present month. On the one hand, I was summoned by my country, whose voice I can never hear but with veneration and love, from a retreat which I had chosen with the fondest predilection, and, in my flattering hopes, with an immutable decision, as the asylum of my declining years: a retreat which was rendered every day more necessary as well as more dear to me, by the addition of habit to inclination, and of frequent interruptions in my health to the gradual waste committed on it by time. On the other hand, the magnitude and difficulty of the trust to which the voice of my country called me, being sufficient to awaken in the wisest and most experienced of her citizens a distrustful scrutiny into his qualifications, could not but overwhelm with despondence, one, who, inheriting inferior endowments from nature, and unpractised in the duties of civil administration, ought to be peculiarly conscious of his own deficiencies. In this conflict of emotions, all I dare aver is, that it has been my faithful study to collect my duty from a just appreciation of every circumstance by which it might be effected. All I dare hope is, that, if in accepting this task, I have been too much swayed by a grateful remembrance of former instances, or by an affectionate sensibility to this transcendent proof of the confidence of my fellow citizens: and have thence too little consulted my incapacity, as well as disinclination for the weighty and untried cares before me; my ERROR will be palliated by the motives which misled me, and its consequences be judged by my country, with some share of the partiality in which they originated.

"Among the ups and downs of life, nothing has caused me more anxiety than the notification I received from your order on the 14th of this month. On one hand, I was called by my country, whose voice I can only respond to with respect and love, from a retreat I had chosen with deep affection and, in my hopeful view, with a firm resolve as the place for my later years: a retreat that became increasingly necessary and dear to me, as habit intertwined with my preferences, and frequent health issues compounded the slow decline brought on by time. On the other hand, the enormity and complexity of the responsibility my country asked me to take on was enough to make even the wisest and most experienced citizens doubt their qualifications, which made me feel overwhelmed, especially since I naturally have lesser abilities and little experience in civil duties, making me acutely aware of my own shortcomings. In this emotional conflict, all I can say is that I’ve sincerely tried to understand my duties based on a fair assessment of every factor that could affect them. All I can hope is that, in accepting this role, if I was too influenced by a grateful remembrance of past instances or by a heartfelt sensitivity to this extraordinary display of trust from my fellow citizens, and therefore didn’t sufficiently consider my own incapacity or reluctance for the heavy and untested responsibilities ahead of me; may my MISTAKE be softened by the intentions that led me astray, and its outcomes be judged by my country with some of the same bias that influenced my decisions."

"Such being the impressions under which I have, in obedience to the public summons, repaired to the present station, it will be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act, my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being who rules over the universe—who presides in the councils of nations—and whose providential aids can supply every human defect, that his benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States, a government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes: and may enable every instrument employed in its administration, to execute with success, the functions allotted to his charge. In tendering this homage to the great Author of every public and private good, I assure myself that it expresses your sentiments not less than my own; nor those of my fellow citizens at large, less than either. No people can be bound to acknowledge and adore the invisible hand which conducts the affairs of men, more than the people of the United States. Every step by which they have advanced to the character of an independent nation seems to have been distinguished by some token of providential agency; and in the important revolution just accomplished in the system of their united government, the tranquil deliberations and voluntary consent of so many distinct communities, from which the event has resulted, can not be compared with the means by which most governments have been established, without some return of pious gratitude along with an humble anticipation of the future blessings which the past seem to presage. These reflections, arising out of the present crisis, have forced themselves too strongly on my mind to be suppressed. You will join with me, I trust, in thinking that there are none, under the influence of which the proceedings of a new and free government can more auspiciously commence.

"Given the impressions that have led me here in response to the public call, it would be particularly inappropriate to skip my heartfelt prayers to the Almighty Being who governs the universe—who leads the councils of nations—and whose guidance can address every human shortcoming. I ask that His blessing may dedicate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a government created by them for these vital purposes: and may He empower every person involved in its administration to successfully fulfill their assigned roles. In offering this respect to the great Source of every public and private good, I believe it reflects your feelings as much as mine; and those of my fellow citizens as well. No one recognizes and honors the unseen force that directs human affairs more than the people of the United States. Every step they have taken toward becoming an independent nation seems marked by signs of divine intervention; and in the significant change just made to their united government, the calm discussions and voluntary agreement of so many different communities involved are unmatched compared to how most governments have been formed, warranting both gratitude and a humble hope for the future blessings that the past seems to suggest. These reflections, prompted by the current situation, are too strong in my mind to ignore. I trust you will agree with me that there is no better foundation for launching the actions of a new and free government."

"By the article establishing the executive department, it is made the duty of the President 'to recommend to your consideration, such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.' The circumstances under which I now meet you will acquit me from entering into that subject, farther than to refer to the great constitutional charter under which you are assembled, and which in defining your powers, designates the objects to which your attention is to be given. It will be more consistent with those circumstances, and far more congenial with the feelings which actuate me, to substitute in place of a recommendation of particular measures, the tribute that is due to the talents, the rectitude, and the patriotism, which adorn the characters selected to devise and adopt them. In these honourable qualifications, I behold the surest pledges that, as on one side, no local prejudices or attachments, no separate views nor party animosities, will misdirect the comprehensive and equal eye which ought to watch over this great assemblage of communities and interests: so, on another, that the foundations of our national policy will be laid in the pure and immutable principles of private morality; and the pre-eminence of free government be exemplified by all the attributes which can win the affections of its citizens, and command the respect of the world. I dwell on this prospect with every satisfaction which an ardent love for my country can inspire, since there is no truth more thoroughly established than that there exists, in the economy and course of nature, an indissoluble union between virtue and happiness—between duty and advantage—between the genuine maxims of an honest and magnanimous policy, and the solid rewards of public prosperity and felicity; since we ought to be no less persuaded that the propitious smiles of heaven can never be expected on a nation that disregards the eternal rules of order and right which heaven itself has ordained: and since the preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the republican model of government, are justly considered as DEEPLY, perhaps as FINALLY staked, on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people.

"According to the article that established the executive branch, it is the President’s duty 'to recommend to your consideration, such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.' Given the circumstances under which I now meet with you, I am excused from discussing that topic further, other than to reference the great constitutional charter under which you are gathered, which defines your powers and outlines the issues you should focus on. It would be more appropriate for the current situation, and much more in line with my feelings, to replace a recommendation of specific measures with a tribute to the talents, integrity, and patriotism of the individuals chosen to devise and adopt them. In these honorable qualities, I see the strongest assurance that, on one hand, no local biases, separate agendas, or party rivalries will misguide the broad and fair perspective that should oversee this vast assembly of communities and interests; and on the other hand, that the foundations of our national policy will be based on the pure and unchanging principles of personal morality, exemplifying the superiority of free government through all the attributes that can earn the affection of its citizens and command the respect of the world. I reflect on this vision with all the satisfaction that a deep love for my country can inspire, as there is no truth more firmly established than the fact that there is an unbreakable link in nature between virtue and happiness—between duty and advantage—between the true principles of honest and noble policy and the real rewards of public prosperity and happiness; for we should also be convinced that the favorable blessings of heaven will never be granted to a nation that ignores the eternal rules of order and right that heaven itself has established: and since the preservation of the sacred flame of liberty and the fate of the republican model of government are rightly viewed as DEEPLY, perhaps FINALLY dependent on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American people."

"Besides the ordinary objects submitted to your care, it will remain with your judgment to decide, how far an exercise of the occasional power delegated by the fifth article of the constitution is rendered expedient, at the present juncture, by the nature of objections which have been urged against the system, or by the degree of inquietude which has given birth to them. Instead of undertaking particular recommendations on this subject, in which I could be guided by no lights derived from official opportunities, I shall again give way to my entire confidence in your discernment and pursuit of the public good: for I assure myself that whilst you carefully avoid every alteration which might endanger the benefits of a united and effective government, or which ought to await the future lessons of experience, a reverence for the characteristic rights of freemen, and a regard for the public harmony, will sufficiently influence your deliberations on the question how far the former can be more impregnably fortified, or the latter be safely and advantageously promoted.

"Besides the usual items under your responsibility, it will be up to your judgment to determine how far the occasional power given by the fifth article of the constitution is appropriate at this time, based on the objections raised against the system or the level of unrest that has caused them. Instead of making specific recommendations on this issue, which I can't support with any official insights, I will again place my full confidence in your ability to perceive what is best for the public good: I trust that while you carefully avoid any changes that could jeopardize the advantages of a united and effective government, or that should wait for future experiences, a respect for the fundamental rights of free individuals and a concern for public harmony will guide your considerations on how to strengthen the former or promote the latter safely and effectively."

"To the preceding observations I have one to add, which will be most properly addressed to the house of representatives. It concerns myself, and will therefore be as brief as possible. When I was first honoured with a call into the service of my country, then on the eve of an arduous struggle for its liberties, the light in which I contemplated my duty required that I should renounce every pecuniary compensation. From this resolution I have in no instance departed. And being still under the impressions which produced it, I must decline, as inapplicable to myself, any share in the personal emoluments which may be indispensably included in a permanent provision for the executive department; and must accordingly pray that the pecuniary estimates for the station in which I am placed, may, during my continuance in it, be limited to such actual expenditures as the public good may be thought to require.

"To the previous comments, I have one more to add, which is best directed to the House of Representatives. It concerns me, so I’ll keep it brief. When I was first honored with a call to serve my country, just before a challenging fight for its freedoms, the way I viewed my duty made it necessary for me to give up any financial compensation. I have never gone back on that decision. And since I still feel the same way, I must decline any personal benefits that might be included in a permanent setup for the executive branch; therefore, I ask that the financial estimates for my position be limited to only the actual expenses needed for the public good while I am in this role."

"Having thus imparted to you my sentiments, as they have been awakened by the occasion which brings us together, I shall take my present leave; but not without resorting once more to the benign Parent of the human race, in humble supplication, that since he has been pleased to favour the American people with opportunities for deliberating in perfect tranquillity, and dispositions for deciding with unparalleled unanimity on a form of government, for the security of their union, and the advancement of their happiness, so his divine blessing may be equally conspicuous in the enlarged views, the temperate consultations, and the wise measures on which the success of this government must depend."

"Having shared my thoughts with you, as they've been stirred by the occasion that brings us together, I will now take my leave. But I do so by once again turning to the compassionate Creator of humanity, in humble prayer, that since He has kindly provided the American people with the chance to discuss matters in complete peace and a strong resolve to decide with remarkable agreement on a government structure for the security of their union and the pursuit of their happiness, His divine blessing may be equally clear in the broad perspectives, calm discussions, and wise decisions that the success of this government relies upon."

Answer of both houses of congress to the speech.

In their answer to this speech, the senate say: "The unanimous suffrage of the elective body in your favour, is peculiarly expressive of the gratitude, confidence, and affection of the citizens of America, and is the highest testimonial at once of your merit, and their esteem. We are sensible, sir, that nothing but the voice of your fellow citizens could have called you from a retreat, chosen with the fondest predilection, endeared by habit, and consecrated to the repose of declining years. We rejoice, and with us all America, that, in obedience to the call of our common country, you have returned once more to public life. In you all parties confide; in you all interests unite; and we have no doubt that your past services, great as they have been, will be equalled by your future exertions; and that your prudence and sagacity, as a statesman, will tend to avert the dangers to which we were exposed, to give stability to the present government, and dignity and splendour to that country, which your skill and valour as a soldier, so eminently contributed to raise to independence and to empire."

In their response to this speech, the Senate says: "The unanimous support of the voting body for you expresses the gratitude, confidence, and affection of the citizens of America and is the highest acknowledgment of both your merit and their respect. We understand, sir, that only the voice of your fellow citizens could have pulled you from a retreat you chose with great affection, one that became dear to you over time, and that was dedicated to the rest you deserve in your later years. We celebrate, along with all of America, that in answer to the call of our shared nation, you have returned to public life once again. Every party trusts you; every interest aligns with you; and we are confident that your past contributions, impressive as they have been, will be matched by your future efforts. Your wisdom and insight as a statesman will help prevent the dangers we face, provide stability to our current government, and bring respect and brilliance to the country that your skill and bravery as a soldier helped elevate to independence and greatness."

The affection for the person and character of the President with which the answer of the house of representatives glowed, promised that between this branch of the legislature also and the executive, the most harmonious co-operation in the public service might be expected.

The strong admiration for the person and character of the President expressed in the House of Representatives' response suggested that there would be a very collaborative relationship between this part of the legislature and the executive branch in serving the public.

"The representatives of the people of the United States," says this address, "present their congratulations on the event by which your fellow citizens have attested the pre-eminence of your merit. You have long held the first place in their esteem. You have often received tokens of their affection. You now possess the only proof that remained of their gratitude for your services, of their reverence for your wisdom, and of their confidence in your virtues. You enjoy the highest, because the truest honour, of being the first magistrate, by the unanimous choice of the freest people on the face of the earth."

"The representatives of the people of the United States," this address states, "extend their congratulations on the occasion through which your fellow citizens have confirmed your outstanding merit. You have long been at the top of their regard. You have frequently received expressions of their affection. You now hold the sole evidence that remained of their gratitude for your service, their respect for your wisdom, and their trust in your character. You have the greatest honor, and the most genuine one, of being the first leader, chosen unanimously by the freest people on earth."

After noticing the several communications made in the speech, intense of deep felt respect and affection, the answer concludes thus:

After noticing the various messages conveyed in the speech, filled with deep respect and affection, the response ends like this:

"Such are the sentiments with which we have thought fit to address you. They flow from our own hearts, and we verily believe that among the millions we represent, there is not a virtuous citizen whose heart will disown them.

"These are the feelings we felt it was right to share with you. They come from our own hearts, and we truly believe that among the millions we represent, there isn't a decent citizen who wouldn't agree with them."

"All that remains is, that we join in your fervent supplications for the blessing of heaven on our country; and that we add our own for the choicest of these blessings on the most beloved of her citizens."

"All that's left is for us to join in your passionate prayers for the blessings of heaven on our country; and for us to add our own for the best of these blessings on the most beloved of her citizens."

Situation of the United States at this period in their domestic and foreign relations.

A perfect knowledge of the antecedent state of things being essential to a due administration of the executive department, its attainment engaged the immediate attention of the President; and he required the temporary heads of departments to prepare and lay before him such statements and documents as would give this information.

A complete understanding of the previous state of affairs is crucial for properly running the executive branch, so the President made it a priority to get this information. He asked the acting heads of departments to gather and present any statements and documents that would provide this insight.

But in the full view which it was useful to take of the interior, many objects were to be contemplated, the documents respecting which were not to be found in official records. The progress which had been made in assuaging the bitter animosities engendered in the sharp contest respecting the adoption of the constitution, and the means which might be used for conciliating the affections of all good men to the new government, without enfeebling its essential principles, were subjects of the most interesting inquiry.

But in the complete picture that it was helpful to consider regarding the interior, there were many things to reflect on, the details of which weren’t found in official records. The advancements made in easing the harsh conflicts generated by the intense debate over adopting the constitution, and the strategies that could be employed to win the goodwill of all decent people toward the new government, without undermining its core principles, were topics of great interest.

The agitation had been too great to be suddenly calmed; and for the active opponents of the system to become suddenly its friends, or even indifferent to its fate, would have been a victory of reason over passion, or a surrender of individual judgment to the decision of a majority, examples of which are rarely given in the progress of human affairs.

The unrest had been too intense to calm down quickly; for those who actively opposed the system to suddenly become its supporters, or even indifferent to what happened to it, would have been a triumph of reason over emotion, or a compromise of personal judgment to the will of the majority, which rarely happens in the course of human events.

In some of the states, a disposition to acquiesce in the decision which had been made, and to await the issue of a fair experiment of the constitution, was avowed by the minority. In others, the chagrin of defeat seemed to increase the original hostility to the instrument; and serious fears were entertained by its friends, that a second general convention might pluck from it the most essential of its powers, before their value, and the safety with which they might be confided where they were placed, could be ascertained by experience.

In some states, a willingness to accept the decision that had been made and to wait for the results of a fair test of the constitution was acknowledged by the minority. In others, the disappointment of defeat appeared to heighten the initial opposition to the document; and serious concerns were raised by its supporters that a second general convention might strip it of its most essential powers before their worth and the safety of entrusting them to their designated holders could be determined through experience.

From the same cause, exerting itself in a different direction, the friends of the new system had been still more alarmed. In all those states where the opposition was sufficiently formidable to inspire a hope of success, the effort was made to fill the legislature with the declared enemies of the government, and thus to commit it, in its infancy, to the custody of its foes. Their fears were quieted for the present. In both branches of the legislature, the federalists, an appellation at that time distinguishing those who had supported the constitution, formed the majority; and it soon appeared that a new convention was too bold an experiment to be applied for by the requisite number of states. The condition of individuals too, was visibly becoming more generally eligible. Industry, notwithstanding the causes which had diminished its profits, was gradually improving their affairs; and the new course of thinking, inspired by the adoption of a constitution prohibiting all laws impairing the obligation of contracts, had, in a great measure, restored that confidence which is essential to the internal prosperity of nations. From these, or from other causes, the crisis of the pressure on individuals seemed to be passing away, and brighter prospects to be opening on them.

Due to the same reasons, but in a different way, supporters of the new system were even more alarmed. In all those states where the opposition was strong enough to suggest a chance of success, efforts were made to fill the legislature with declared enemies of the government, effectively handing it over to its opponents in its early stages. Their fears were calmed for the moment. In both branches of the legislature, the federalists—who at that time were those supporting the constitution—held the majority. It quickly became clear that calling for a new convention was too daring an experiment to be pursued by the necessary number of states. The situation for individuals was also noticeably improving. Despite the factors that had reduced their profits, industry was gradually enhancing economic conditions; and the new way of thinking, spurred by the adoption of a constitution that prohibited any laws undermining the obligation of contracts, had largely restored the confidence essential for the internal prosperity of nations. For these reasons, or perhaps others, the intense pressure on individuals seemed to be easing, and brighter prospects were beginning to emerge for them.

But, two states still remained out of the pale of the union; and a mass of ill humour existed among those who were included within it, which increased the necessity of circumspection in those who administered the government.

But two states still remained outside of the union, and there was a lot of ill will among those who were part of it, which made it even more important for those in charge of the government to be careful.

To the western parts of the continent, the attention of the executive was attracted by discontents which were displayed with some violence, and which originated in circumstances, and in interests, peculiar to that country.

To the western parts of the continent, the executive's attention was drawn to unrest that was shown somewhat violently and stemmed from specific circumstances and interests unique to that region.

Spain, in possession of the mouth of the Mississippi, had refused to permit the citizens of the United States to follow its waters into the ocean; and had occasionally tolerated or interdicted their commerce to New Orleans, as had been suggested by the supposed interest or caprice of the Spanish government, or of its representatives in America. The eyes of the inhabitants adjacent to the waters which emptied into that river, were turned down it, as the only channel through which the surplus produce of their luxuriant soil could be conveyed to the markets of the world. Believing that the future wealth and prosperity of their country depended on the use of that river, they gave some evidence of a disposition to drop from the confederacy, if this valuable acquisition could not otherwise be made. This temper could not fail to be viewed with interest by the neighbouring powers, who had been encouraged by it, and by the imbecility of the government, to enter into intrigues of an alarming nature.

Spain, controlling the mouth of the Mississippi, had refused to let U.S. citizens navigate its waters into the ocean and occasionally allowed or blocked their trade to New Orleans, influenced by the interests or whims of the Spanish government or its representatives in America. The residents near the waters flowing into that river looked to it as the only route for getting their abundant produce to global markets. Convinced that their country's future wealth and success relied on using that river, they showed signs of wanting to leave the confederacy if they couldn’t secure this valuable access. This attitude was inevitably of interest to neighboring powers, who were encouraged by it, as well as by the weakness of the government, to engage in troubling intrigues.

Previous to his departure from Mount Vernon, the President had received intelligence, too authentic to be disregarded, of private machinations by real or pretended agents both of Spain and Great Britain, which were extremely hostile to the peace, and to the integrity of the union.

Before leaving Mount Vernon, the President received reliable information about private schemes by actual or fake agents from both Spain and Great Britain, which were very harmful to peace and the unity of the nation.

Spain had intimated that the navigation of the Mississippi could never be conceded, while the inhabitants of the western country remained connected with the Atlantic states, but might be freely granted to them, if they should form an independent empire.

Spain had indicated that navigation of the Mississippi could never be allowed as long as the people in the western region remained tied to the Atlantic states, but it might be freely allowed to them if they were to establish an independent empire.

On the other hand, a gentleman from Canada, whose ostensible business was to repossess himself of some lands on the Ohio which had been formerly granted to him, frequently discussed the vital importance of the navigation of the Mississippi, and privately assured several individuals of great influence, that if they were disposed to assert their rights, he was authorized by Lord Dorchester, the governor of Canada, to say, that they might rely confidently on his assistance. With the aid it was in his power to give, they might seize New Orleans, fortify the Balise at the mouth of the Mississippi, and maintain themselves in that place against the utmost efforts of Spain.

On the other hand, a man from Canada, whose main purpose was to reclaim some land in Ohio that had previously been granted to him, often talked about how crucial it was to navigate the Mississippi River. He privately assured several influential individuals that if they were willing to stand up for their rights, he had the backing of Lord Dorchester, the governor of Canada, to say they could count on his help. With the support he could provide, they could take New Orleans, strengthen the Balise at the mouth of the Mississippi, and hold their ground there against Spain's strongest efforts.

The probability of failing in any attempt to hold the mouth of the Mississippi by force, and the resentments against Great Britain which prevailed generally throughout the western country, diminished the danger to be apprehended from any machinations of that power; but against those of Spain, the same security did not exist.

The chance of failing in any effort to control the mouth of the Mississippi by force, along with the widespread anger toward Great Britain in the western regions, reduced the threat from that country. However, the same level of security was not present when it came to the threats from Spain.

In contemplating the situation of the United States in their relations not purely domestic, the object demanding most immediate consideration was the hostility of several tribes of Indians. The military strength of the nations who inhabited the country between the lakes, the Mississippi, and the Ohio, was computed at five thousand men, of whom about fifteen hundred were at open war with the United States. Treaties had been concluded with the residue; but the attachment of young savages to war, and the provocation given by the undistinguishing vengeance which had been taken by the whites in their expeditions into the Indian country, furnished reasons for apprehending that these treaties would soon be broken.

In considering the situation of the United States regarding their relationships beyond just domestic issues, the most pressing concern was the hostility of several Native American tribes. The combined military strength of the nations living in the area between the Great Lakes, the Mississippi River, and the Ohio River was estimated to be around five thousand men, with about fifteen hundred actively waging war against the United States. Treaties had been signed with the remainder, but the young warriors' inclination towards conflict and the indiscriminate retaliation taken by white settlers during their incursions into Native lands raised concerns that these treaties would soon be violated.

In the south, the Creeks, who could bring into the field six thousand fighting men, were at war with Georgia. In the mind of their leader, the son of a white man, some irritation had been produced by the confiscation of the lands of his father, who had resided in that state; and several other refugees whose property had also been confiscated, contributed still further to exasperate the nation. But the immediate point in contest between them was a tract of land on the Oconee, which the state of Georgia claimed under a purchase, the validity of which was denied by the Indians.

In the south, the Creeks, who could deploy six thousand fighters, were at war with Georgia. Their leader, the son of a white man, felt some irritation due to the confiscation of his father's lands, who had lived in that state. Several other refugees, whose properties were also taken, added to the anger of the nation. However, the main issue at stake was a piece of land on the Oconee River, which the state of Georgia claimed to have purchased, a claim that the Indians disputed.

The regular force of the United States was less than six hundred men.

The active-duty military of the United States had fewer than six hundred soldiers.

Not only the policy of accommodating differences by negotiation which the government was in no condition to terminate by the sword; but a real respect for the rights of the natives, and a regard for the claims of justice and humanity, disposed the President to endeavour, in the first instance, to remove every cause of quarrel by a treaty; and his message to congress on this subject evidenced his preference of pacific measures.

Not only was the government unable to resolve differences through force, but there was also a genuine respect for the rights of the native people and an awareness of justice and humanity. This led the President to first try to eliminate any reasons for conflict through a treaty, and his message to Congress on this issue showed that he favored peaceful solutions.

Possessing many valuable articles of commerce for which the best market was often found on the coast of the Mediterranean, struggling to export them in their own bottoms, and unable to afford a single gun for their protection, the Americans could not view with unconcern the dispositions which were manifested towards them by the Barbary powers. A treaty had been formed with the emperor of Morocco; but from Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli, peace had not been purchased; and those regencies consider all as enemies to whom they have not sold their friendship. The unprotected vessels of America presented a tempting object to their rapacity; and their hostility was the more terrible, because by their public law, prisoners became slaves.

Having many valuable goods to trade, which were best sold along the Mediterranean coast, and struggling to ship them in their own vessels without even being able to afford a single gun for protection, the Americans couldn't ignore the actions taken against them by the Barbary powers. A treaty had been made with the emperor of Morocco, but there was no peace with Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli; these states view anyone they haven't formed an agreement with as an enemy. The defenseless American ships were an attractive target for their greed, and their hostility was especially frightening because, according to their laws, prisoners would become slaves.

The United States were at peace with all the powers of Europe; but controversies of a delicate nature existed with some of them, the adjustment of which required a degree of moderation and firmness, which there was reason to fear, might not, in every instance, be exhibited.

The United States was at peace with all the powers of Europe; however, there were some sensitive disputes with a few of them that needed a level of moderation and firmness, which one might worry could not always be demonstrated.

The early apprehensions with which Spain had contemplated the future strength of the United States, and the consequent disposition of the house of Bourbon to restrict them to narrow limits, have been already noticed. After the conclusion of the war, the attempt to form a treaty with that power had been repeated; but no advance towards an agreement on the points of difference between the two governments had been made. A long and intricate negotiation between the secretary of foreign affairs, and Don Guardoqui, the minister of his Catholic majesty, had terminated with the old government; and the result was an inflexible adherence on the part of Mr. Guardoqui to the exclusion of the citizens of the United States from navigating the Mississippi below their southern boundary. On this point there was much reason to fear that the cabinet of Madrid would remain immoveable. The violence with which the discontents of the western people were expressed, furnished Spain with additional motives for perpetuating the evil of which they complained. Aware of the embarrassments which this display of restlessness must occasion, and sensible of the increased difficulty and delay with which a removal of its primary cause must be attended, the executive perceived in this critical state of things, abundant cause for the exercise of its watchfulness, and of its prudence. With Spain, there was also a contest respecting boundaries. The treaty of peace had extended the limits of the United States to the thirty-first degree of north latitude, but the pretensions of the Catholic King were carried north of that line, to an undefined extent. He claimed as far as he had conquered from Britain, but the precise limits of his conquest were not ascertained.

The early concerns that Spain had about the future power of the United States, and the resulting desire of the Bourbon monarchy to keep them limited, have already been mentioned. After the war ended, efforts to form a treaty with Spain were renewed; however, no progress was made on the issues separating the two governments. A lengthy and complicated negotiation between the Secretary of Foreign Affairs and Don Guardoqui, the minister of his Catholic Majesty, ended with the previous government, resulting in Mr. Guardoqui’s unwavering position to prevent U.S. citizens from navigating the Mississippi River below their southern border. There was much reason to fear that the Madrid cabinet would remain steadfast on this issue. The intense expressions of discontent from the western population gave Spain more reasons to continue the problems they were facing. Aware of the difficulties that this unrest would cause, and recognizing the increased challenges and delays that would come with addressing its primary cause, the administration felt it had ample reason to be vigilant and cautious. There was also a dispute over boundaries with Spain. The peace treaty had extended the limits of the United States to the 31st degree of north latitude, but the claims of the Catholic King extended beyond that line to an undefined point. He claimed all the territory he had taken from Britain, but the exact boundaries of his conquests were not determined.

The circumstances attending the points of difference with Great Britain, were still more serious; because, in their progress, a temper unfavourable to accommodation had been uniformly displayed.

The issues causing the differences with Great Britain were even more serious because, throughout the process, an attitude that was against reaching an agreement had consistently been shown.

The resentments produced by the various calamities war had occasioned, were not terminated with their cause. The idea that Great Britain was the natural enemy of America had become habitual. Believing it impossible for that nation to have relinquished its views of conquest, many found it difficult to bury their animosities, and to act upon the sentiment contained in the declaration of independence, "to hold them as the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends." In addition to the complaints respecting the violation of the treaty of peace, events were continually supplying this temper with fresh aliment. The disinclination which the cabinet of London had discovered to a commercial treaty with the United States was not attributed exclusively to the cause which had been assigned for it. It was in part ascribed to that jealousy with which Britain was supposed to view the growing trade of America.

The resentments caused by the various disasters brought on by war didn’t end once the war was over. The belief that Great Britain was America’s natural enemy had become a routine thought. Many found it hard to let go of their grudges and embrace the idea from the Declaration of Independence, “to regard them like the rest of humanity, as enemies in war, but friends in peace.” Alongside the complaints about the violations of the peace treaty, ongoing events kept feeding this mindset. The reluctance of the London government to pursue a commercial treaty with the United States wasn’t solely attributed to the reasons given. It was also partly linked to the suspicion that Britain held towards America’s expanding trade.

The general restrictions on commerce by which every maritime power sought to promote its own navigation, and that part of the European system in particular, by which each aimed at a monopoly of the trade of its colonies, were felt with peculiar keenness when enforced by England. The people of America were perhaps the more sensible to the British resolutions on this subject, because, having composed a part of that empire, they had grown up in the habit of a free intercourse with all its ports; and, without accurately appreciating the cause to which a change of this usage was to be ascribed, they attributed it to a jealousy of their prosperity, and to an inclination to diminish the value of their independence. In this suspicious temper, almost every unfavourable event which occurred was traced up to British hostility.

The overall restrictions on trade that every maritime power used to boost its own shipping, particularly that part of the European system where each aimed for a monopoly on its colonies' trade, were felt most sharply when enforced by England. The people of America were particularly sensitive to the British decisions regarding this issue because they had been part of that empire and were used to freely accessing all its ports. Without fully understanding the reasons behind this change in practice, they attributed it to British jealousy over their success and a desire to undermine their independence. In this wary mindset, almost every negative event that happened was linked back to British hostility.

That an attempt to form a commercial treaty with Portugal had failed, was attributed to the influence of the cabinet of London; and to the machinations of the same power were also ascribed the danger from the corsairs of Barbary, and the bloody incursions of the Indians. The resentment excited by these causes was felt by a large proportion of the American people; and the expression of it was common and public. That correspondent dispositions existed in England is by no means improbable, and the necessary effect of this temper was to increase the difficulty of adjusting the differences between the two nations.

The failure to establish a trade agreement with Portugal was blamed on the influence of the London government, and the same power was also thought to be behind the threats from the Barbary pirates and the violent attacks by Native Americans. A significant portion of the American public felt anger over these issues, and it was openly expressed. It’s quite likely that similar sentiments existed in England, and this mindset only made it harder to resolve the conflicts between the two nations.

With France, the most perfect harmony subsisted. Those attachments which originated in the signal services received from his most Christian Majesty during the war of the revolution, had sustained no diminution. Yet, from causes which it was found difficult to counteract, the commercial intercourse between the two nations was not so extensive as had been expected. It was the interest, and of consequence the policy of France, to avail herself of the misunderstandings between the United States and Great Britain, in order to obtain such regulations as might gradually divert the increasing trade of the American continent from those channels in which it had been accustomed to flow; and a disposition was felt throughout the United States to co-operate with her, in enabling her merchants, by legislative encouragements, to rival those of Britain in the American market.

With France, there was a perfect harmony. The strong bonds formed during the significant support received from His Most Christian Majesty during the Revolutionary War had not weakened. However, due to factors that were hard to overcome, trade between the two nations wasn't as extensive as expected. It was in France's interest and, therefore, her policy to take advantage of the misunderstandings between the United States and Great Britain to establish regulations that could gradually redirect the growing trade of the American continent away from its usual routes. There was also a sense in the United States to work together with her, providing legislative support to help her merchants compete with those from Britain in the American market.

A great revolution had commenced in that country, the first stage of which was completed by limiting the powers of the monarch, and by the establishment of a popular assembly. In no part of the globe was this revolution hailed with more joy than in America. The influence it would have on the affairs of the world was not then distinctly foreseen: and the philanthropist, without becoming a political partisan, rejoiced in the event. On this subject, therefore, but one sentiment existed.

A great revolution had started in that country, the first stage of which was achieved by limiting the monarch's powers and establishing a popular assembly. No place on earth celebrated this revolution more than America. The impact it would have on global affairs wasn’t clearly understood at the time, and those who cared for the well-being of others, without taking a political side, were happy about it. So, on this topic, there was only one feeling.

The relations of the United States with the other powers of Europe, did not require particular attention. Their dispositions were rather friendly than otherwise; and an inclination was generally manifested to participate in the advantages, which the erection of an independent empire on the western shores of the Atlantic, held forth to the commercial world.

The U.S. relationships with other European powers didn’t need much focus. They were mostly friendly, and there was a general willingness to share in the benefits that the establishment of an independent nation on the western shores of the Atlantic offered to the business world.

By the ministers of foreign powers in America, it would readily be supposed, that the first steps taken by the new government would, not only be indicative of its present system, but would probably affect its foreign relations permanently, and that the influence of the President would be felt in the legislature. Scarcely was the exercise of his executive functions commenced, when the President received an application from the Count de Moustiers, the minister of France, requesting a private conference. On being told that the department of foreign affairs was the channel through which all official business should pass, the Count replied that the interview he requested was, not for the purpose of actual business, but rather as preparatory to its future transaction.

By the foreign ministers in America, it would easily be assumed that the first actions taken by the new government would not only show its current approach but could also permanently influence its foreign relations, and that the President's impact would be felt in the legislature. Hardly had he started exercising his executive powers when the President received a request from Count de Moustiers, the minister of France, asking for a private meeting. When informed that all official matters should go through the department of foreign affairs, the Count replied that he wanted the meeting not for immediate business but more as a preparation for future discussions.

The next day, at one in the afternoon, was named for the interview. The Count commenced the conversation with declarations of his personal regard for America, the manifestations of which, he said, had been early and uniform. His nation too was well disposed to be upon terms of amity with the United States: but at his public reception, there were occurrences which he thought indicative of coolness in the secretary of foreign affairs, who had, he feared, while in Europe, imbibed prejudices not only against Spain, but against France also. If this conjecture should be right, the present head of that department could not be an agreeable organ of intercourse with the President. He then took a view of the modern usages of European courts, which, he said, favoured the practice he recommended of permitting foreign ministers to make their communications directly to the chief of the executive. "He then presented a letter," says the President in his private journal, "which he termed confidential, and to be considered as addressed to me in my private character, which was too strongly marked with an intention, as well as a wish, to have no person between the Minister and President, in the transaction of business between the two nations."

The next day, at 1 PM, was set for the interview. The Count started the conversation by expressing his personal admiration for America, which he said had been consistent and evident from the beginning. His country was also eager to maintain friendly relations with the United States; however, during his public reception, he noticed signs of indifference from the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, who, he feared, had picked up biases against not only Spain but also France while in Europe. If this guess was correct, then the current head of that department couldn't effectively communicate with the President. He then discussed the current practices of European courts, which, he argued, supported his suggestion that foreign ministers be allowed to communicate directly with the head of the executive. "He then presented a letter," the President notes in his private journal, "which he called confidential and meant to be viewed as addressed to me in my personal capacity, clearly showing a desire to eliminate any intermediary between the Minister and the President in matters concerning the two nations."

In reply to these observations, the President gave the most explicit assurances that, judging from his own feelings, and from the public sentiment, there existed in America a reciprocal disposition to be on the best terms with France. That whatever former difficulties might have occurred, he was persuaded the secretary of foreign affairs had offered no intentional disrespect, either to the minister, or to his nation. Without undertaking to know the private opinions of Mr. Jay, he would declare that he had never heard that officer express, directly or indirectly, any sentiment unfavourable to either.

In response to these comments, the President provided clear assurances that, based on his own feelings and the public sentiment, there was a mutual desire in America to maintain good relations with France. He believed that regardless of any previous issues, the secretary of foreign affairs had not shown any intentional disrespect, either to the minister or to his country. Without trying to guess Mr. Jay's private opinions, he stated that he had never heard that official express, either directly or indirectly, any negative feelings toward either side.

Reason and usage, he added, must direct the mode of treating national and official business. If rules had been established, they must be conformed to. If they were yet to be framed, it was hoped that they would be convenient and proper. So far as ease could be made to comport with regularity, and with necessary forms, it ought to be consulted; but custom, and the dignity of office, were not to be disregarded. The conversation continued upwards of an hour, but no change was made in the resolution of the President.

Reason and practice, he added, should guide how national and official matters are handled. If rules had been set, they needed to be followed. If they were still being developed, it was hoped they would be practical and suitable. As much as comfort could align with order and necessary procedures, it should be taken into account; however, tradition and the respect due to office should not be overlooked. The discussion went on for over an hour, but there was no change in the President's decision.

The subjects which pressed for immediate attention on the first legislature assembled under the new government, were numerous and important. Much was to be created, and much to be reformed.

The issues that needed immediate attention when the first legislature gathered under the new government were many and significant. A lot needed to be established, and a lot needed to be changed.

The subject of revenue, as constituting the vital spring without which the action of government could not long be continued, was taken up in the house of representatives, as soon as it could be introduced. The qualification of the members was succeeded by a motion for the house to resolve itself into a committee of the whole on the state of the union; and in that committee, a resolution was moved by Mr. Madison, declaring the opinion that certain duties ought to be levied on goods, wares, and merchandise, imported into the United States; and on the tonnage of vessels.

The topic of revenue, essential for the functioning of government, was addressed in the House of Representatives as soon as it could be brought up. After the qualifications of the members were established, a motion was made for the House to turn into a committee of the whole to discuss the state of the union. In that committee, Mr. Madison proposed a resolution stating that certain taxes should be imposed on goods and merchandise imported into the United States, as well as on the tonnage of ships.

As it was deemed important to complete a temporary system in time to embrace the spring importations, Mr. Madison presented the scheme of impost which had been recommended by the former congress, and had already received the approbation of a majority of the states; to which he added a general proposition for a duty on tonnage. By this scheme specific duties were imposed on certain enumerated articles; and an ad-valorem duty on those not enumerated. Mr. Fitzsimmons, of Pennsylvania, moved an amendment, enlarging the catalogue of enumerated articles.

As it was considered important to finish a temporary system in time for the spring imports, Mr. Madison proposed the tax plan that had been suggested by the previous congress and had already gained approval from most states; he also included a general proposal for a duty on tonnage. This plan set specific duties on certain listed items and an ad-valorem duty on items that were not listed. Mr. Fitzsimmons from Pennsylvania proposed an amendment to expand the list of enumerated articles.

Debates on the impost and tonnage bills.

Mr. Madison having consented to subjoin the amendment proposed by Mr. Fitzsimmons to the original resolution, it was received by the committee; but in proceeding to fill up the blanks with the sum taxable on each article, it was soon perceived that gentlemen had viewed the subject in very different lights. The tax on many articles was believed to press more heavily on some states than on others; and apprehensions were expressed that, in the form of protecting duties, the industry of one part of the union would be encouraged by premiums charged on the labour of another part. On the discrimination between the duty on the tonnage of foreign and American bottoms, a great degree of sensibility was discovered. The citizens of the United States not owning a sufficient number of vessels to export all the produce of the country, it was said that the increased tonnage on foreign bottoms operated as a tax on agriculture, and a premium to navigation. This discrimination, it was therefore contended, ought to be very small.

Mr. Madison agreed to add the amendment suggested by Mr. Fitzsimmons to the original resolution, and the committee accepted it. However, as they moved to fill in the blanks with the taxable amounts for each item, it quickly became clear that the members had very different perspectives on the issue. Many believed the tax on various items would impact some states more than others; concerns were raised that protective duties would boost the economy in one part of the country at the expense of another. There was a strong reaction regarding the difference in duties on the tonnage of foreign and American ships. Since the citizens of the United States didn’t own enough vessels to export all of the nation’s produce, it was argued that the increased tonnage charges on foreign ships acted as a tax on agriculture while benefiting navigation. As a result, it was argued that this difference should be kept to a minimum.

In answer to these arguments, Mr. Madison said, "If it is expedient for America to have vessels employed in commerce at all, it will be proper that she have enough to answer all the purposes intended; to form a school for seamen; to lay the foundation of a navy: and to be able to support itself against the interference of foreigners. I do not think there is much weight in the observations that the duty we are about to lay in favour of American vessels is a burden on the community, and particularly oppressive to some parts. But if there were, it may be a burden of that kind which will ultimately save us from one that is greater.

In response to these arguments, Mr. Madison said, "If it makes sense for America to have vessels involved in commerce at all, it’s essential that we have enough to meet all intended goals; to create a training ground for sailors; to establish a navy; and to be able to defend ourselves against foreign interference. I don’t think the claims that the duty we’re about to impose in favor of American vessels is a burden on the community, especially oppressive to certain areas, hold much weight. However, even if it were a burden, it might be the kind that ultimately protects us from a much larger one."

"I consider an acquisition of maritime strength essential to this country; should we ever be so unfortunate as to be engaged in war, what but this can defend our towns and cities upon the sea coast? Or what but this can enable us to repel an invading enemy? Those parts which are said to bear an undue proportion of the burden of the additional duty on foreign shipping, are those which will be most exposed to the operations of a predatory war, and will require the greatest exertions of the union in their defence. If therefore some little sacrifice be made by them to obtain this important object, they will be peculiarly rewarded for it in the hour of danger. Granting a preference to our own navigation will insensibly bring it forward to that perfection so essential to American safety; and though it may produce some little inequality at first, it will soon ascertain its level, and become uniform throughout the union."

"I believe that building up our maritime power is crucial for this country. If we ever find ourselves in war, what else can protect our coastal towns and cities? What else can help us fight off an invading enemy? The areas that are said to carry an unfair share of the extra tax on foreign shipping will be the most vulnerable to attacks during a war and will need the strongest support from the union to defend themselves. So, if they make some small sacrifices to achieve this important goal, they will be especially rewarded when danger strikes. Prioritizing our own shipping will gradually enhance it to the level necessary for America's safety; and although it might create some initial imbalance, it will quickly find its equilibrium and become consistent across the union."

But no part of the system was discussed with more animation than that which proposed to make discriminations in favour of those nations with whom the United States had formed commercial treaties. In the debate on this subject, opinions and feelings with respect to foreign powers were disclosed, which, strengthening with circumstances, afterwards agitated the whole American continent.

But no part of the system was talked about with more enthusiasm than the proposal to favor those nations with which the United States had established commercial treaties. During the debate on this topic, opinions and emotions regarding foreign powers were revealed, which, fueled by circumstances, later stirred up the entire American continent.

While the resolutions on which the bills were to be framed were under debate, Mr. Benson rose to inquire on what principle the proposed discriminations between foreign nations was founded? "It was certainly proper," he said, "to comply with existing treaties. But those treaties stipulated no such preference. Congress then was at liberty to consult the interests of the United States. If those interests would be promoted by the measure, he should be willing to adopt it, but he wished its policy to be shown."

While the resolutions for the bills were being discussed, Mr. Benson stood up to ask on what basis the proposed differences between foreign nations were established. "It’s definitely important," he said, "to adhere to existing treaties. But those treaties didn't specify any such preference. Congress is free to consider the interests of the United States. If those interests would benefit from this measure, I would be open to supporting it, but I want to understand its policy."

The resolutions, as reported, were supported by Mr. Madison, Mr. Baldwin, Mr. Fitzsimmons, Mr. Clymer, Mr. Page, and Mr. Jackson.

The resolutions, as reported, were backed by Mr. Madison, Mr. Baldwin, Mr. Fitzsimmons, Mr. Clymer, Mr. Page, and Mr. Jackson.

They relied much upon the public sentiment which had, they said, been unequivocally expressed through the several state legislatures and otherwise, against placing foreign nations generally, on a footing with the allies of the United States. So strong was this sentiment, that to its operation the existing constitution was principally to be ascribed. They thought it important to prove to those nations who had declined forming commercial treaties with them, that the United States possessed and would exercise the power of retaliating any regulations unfavourable to their trade, and they insisted strongly on the advantages of America in a war of commercial regulation, should this measure produce one.

They heavily relied on public opinion, which they claimed had been clearly shown through various state legislatures and other channels, against treating foreign nations generally on the same level as the allies of the United States. This sentiment was so strong that the current constitution was largely attributed to its influence. They believed it was important to demonstrate to those nations that refused to establish commercial treaties with them that the United States had the power and would act to retaliate against any regulations that were unfavorable to their trade. They strongly emphasized the advantages America would have in a commercial regulation war if this situation led to one.

The disposition France had lately shown to relax with regard to the United States, the rigid policy by which her counsels had generally been guided, ought to be cultivated. The evidence of this disposition was an edict by which American built ships purchased by French subjects became naturalized. There was reason to believe that the person charged with the affairs of the United States at that court, had made some favourable impressions, which the conduct of the American government ought not to efface.

The recent attitude that France has shown towards the United States, moving away from its usually strict policies, should be encouraged. The proof of this attitude is an order allowing ships built in America that are bought by French citizens to be recognized as French. There were indications that the person handling U.S. affairs at that court had made some positive impacts, which the actions of the American government should not undo.

With great earnestness it was urged, that from artificial or adventitious causes, the commerce between the United States and Great Britain had exceeded its natural boundary. It was wise to give such political advantages to other nations as would enable them to acquire their due share of the direct trade. It was also wise to impart some benefits to nations that had formed commercial treaties with the United States, and thereby to impress on those powers which had hitherto neglected to form such treaties, the idea that some advantages were to be gained by a reciprocity of friendship.

With great seriousness, it was emphasized that due to artificial or external factors, trade between the United States and Great Britain had gone beyond its natural limits. It made sense to offer political advantages to other countries so they could take their fair share of direct trade. It also made sense to provide some benefits to nations that had established trade treaties with the United States, thus encouraging those countries that had previously overlooked creating such agreements to realize that they could gain advantages through mutual friendship.

That France had claims on the gratitude of the American people which ought not to be overlooked, was an additional argument in favour of the principle for which they contended.

That France had reasons to expect gratitude from the American people that shouldn't be ignored was another argument supporting the principle they were advocating for.

The discrimination was opposed by Mr. Benson, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Wadsworth, and Mr. Sherman.

The discrimination was opposed by Mr. Benson, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Wadsworth, and Mr. Sherman.

They did not admit that the public sentiment had been unequivocally expressed; nor did they admit that such benefits had flowed from commercial treaties as to justify a sacrifice of interest to obtain them. There was a commercial treaty with France; but neither that treaty, nor the favours shown to that nation, had produced any correspondent advantages. The license to sell ships could not be of this description, since it was well known that the merchants of the United States did not own vessels enough for the transportation of the produce of the country, and only two, as was believed, had been sold since the license had been granted. The trade with Great Britain, viewed in all its parts, was upon a footing as beneficial to the United States as that with France.

They did not acknowledge that public opinion had been clearly expressed; nor did they accept that such benefits had come from commercial treaties to justify sacrificing interests to obtain them. There was a trade agreement with France, but neither that agreement nor the favors given to that nation had led to any significant advantages. The permission to sell ships didn’t fall into this category, as it was well known that merchants in the United States didn’t have enough vessels to transport the country's goods, and only two, as believed, had been sold since the license was granted. Overall, trade with Great Britain was just as beneficial to the United States as trade with France.

That the latter power had claims upon the gratitude of America was admitted, but that these claims would justify premiums for the encouragement of French commerce and navigation, to be drawn from the pockets of the American people, was not conceded. The state of the revenue, it was said, would not admit of these experiments.

That the latter power had earned America's gratitude was acknowledged, but it was not accepted that these claims warranted rewards to promote French commerce and navigation funded by the American public. It was said that the state of the revenue would not allow for these ventures.

The observation founded on the extensiveness of the trade between the United States and Great Britain was answered by saying, that this was not a subject proper for legislative interposition. It was one of which the merchants were the best judges. They would consult their interest as individuals; and this was a case in which the interest of the nation and of individuals was the same.

The observation based on the extensive trade between the United States and Great Britain was met with the response that this wasn’t an issue suitable for government intervention. Merchants were the best judges of the matter. They would consider their own interests; in this case, the interests of the nation and those of individuals aligned.

At length, the bills passed the house of representatives, and were carried to the senate, where they were amended by expunging the discrimination made in favour of the tonnage and distilled spirits of those nations which had formed commercial treaties with the United States.

Finally, the bills passed the House of Representatives and were taken to the Senate, where they were amended by removing the favoritism shown toward the tonnage and distilled spirits of nations that had made trade agreements with the United States.

These amendments were disagreed to; and each house insisting on its opinion, a conference took place, after which the point was reluctantly yielded by the house of representatives. The proceedings of the senate being at that time conducted with closed doors, the course of reasoning on which this important principle was rejected can not be stated.

These amendments were not agreed upon; and since each house stood firm in its position, a conference was held, after which the house of representatives reluctantly gave in. At that time, the senate's proceedings were held behind closed doors, so the reasoning behind the rejection of this important principle cannot be detailed.

This debate on the impost and tonnage bills was succeeded by one on a subject which was believed to involve principles of still greater interest.

This discussion about the impost and tonnage bills was followed by another on a topic that was thought to involve even more significant principles.

On the President's power of removal from office.

In organizing the departments of the executive, the question in what manner the high officers who filled them should be removeable, came on to be discussed. Believing that the decision of this question would materially influence the character of the new government, the members supported their respective opinions with a degree of earnestness proportioned to the importance they attributed to the measure. In a committee of the whole house on the bill "to establish an executive department to be denominated the[42] department of foreign affairs," Mr. White moved to strike out the clause which declared the secretary to be removeable by the President. The power of removal, where no express provision existed, was, he said, in the nature of things, incidental to that of appointment. And as the senate was, by the constitution, associated with the President in making appointments, that body must, in the same degree, participate in the power of removing from office.

In organizing the executive departments, the discussion turned to how the top officials should be removable. Recognizing that the outcome of this discussion would significantly impact the nature of the new government, the members passionately backed their views in accordance with the importance they assigned to the issue. During a committee meeting on the bill "to establish an executive department to be called the[42] department of foreign affairs," Mr. White proposed to remove the clause stating that the secretary could be removed by the President. He argued that the power to remove, where there was no specific provision, was naturally part of the power to appoint. Since the Senate was constitutionally involved with the President in making appointments, it should also share in the authority to remove officials from office.

Mr. White was supported by Mr. Smith of South Carolina, Mr. Page, Mr. Stone, and Mr. Jackson.

Mr. White was backed by Mr. Smith from South Carolina, Mr. Page, Mr. Stone, and Mr. Jackson.

Those gentlemen contended that the clause was either unnecessary or improper. If the constitution gave the power to the President, a repetition of the grant in an act of congress was nugatory: if the constitution did not give it, the attempt to confer it by law was improper. If it belonged conjointly to the President and senate, the house of representatives should not attempt to abridge the constitutional prerogative of the other branch of the legislature. However this might be, they were clearly of opinion that it was not placed in the President alone. In the power over all the executive officers which the bill proposed to confer upon the President, the most alarming dangers to liberty were perceived. It was in the nature of monarchical prerogative, and would convert them into the mere tools and creatures of his will. A dependence so servile on one individual, would deter men of high and honourable minds from engaging in the public service; and if, contrary to expectation, such men should be brought into office, they would be reduced to the necessity of sacrificing every principle of independence to the will of the chief magistrate, or of exposing themselves to the disgrace of being removed from office, and that too at a time when it might be no longer in their power to engage in other pursuits.

Those gentlemen argued that the clause was either unnecessary or inappropriate. If the constitution granted the power to the President, repeating that grant in a congressional act was pointless; if the constitution didn’t give it, trying to grant it by law was wrong. If the power was shared between the President and the Senate, the House of Representatives shouldn’t try to undermine the constitutional authority of the other branch of the legislature. Regardless, they firmly believed that it was not exclusively given to the President. They saw the power over all the executive officers that the bill aimed to give to the President as posing significant threats to liberty. It resembled monarchical privilege and would turn them into mere instruments of his will. Such a submissive dependence on one person would discourage people of high principles and honor from participating in public service; and if, against all odds, such individuals did take office, they would have to sacrifice every principle of independence to the will of the chief magistrate or risk the disgrace of being dismissed from their positions, at a time when it might be impossible for them to pursue other opportunities.

Gentlemen they feared were too much dazzled with the splendour of the virtues which adorned the actual President, to be able to look into futurity. But the framers of the constitution had not confined their views to the person who would most probably first fill the presidential chair. The house of representatives ought to follow their example, and to contemplate this power in the hands of an ambitious man, who might apply it to dangerous purposes; who might from caprice remove the most worthy men from office.

Gentlemen feared they were too dazzled by the brilliance of the virtues that adorned the current President to see into the future. But the creators of the constitution didn’t limit their focus to the person likely to be the first to take the presidential seat. The House of Representatives should follow their lead and consider this power in the hands of an ambitious person, who might use it for harmful purposes, who could whimsically remove the most deserving individuals from office.

 

View of the Old City or Federal Hall, New York, in 1789

View of the Old City or Federal Hall, New York, in 1789

On the balcony of this building, the site of which is now occupied by the United States Sub-Treasury, at the corner of Broad and Wall Streets, George Washington took the oath of office as First President of the United States, April 30, 1789. In the near distance, at the intersection of Wall and Broadway, may be seen the original Trinity Church structure which was completed in 1697. It was replaced by the present edifice in 1846. President Washington, who was an Episcopalian, did not attend Trinity, but maintained a pew in St. Paul's Chapel, Broadway and Vesey Street, which remains as it was when he worshipped there.

On the balcony of this building, which is now the site of the United States Sub-Treasury at the corner of Broad and Wall Streets, George Washington took the oath of office as the First President of the United States on April 30, 1789. In the distance, at the intersection of Wall and Broadway, you can see the original Trinity Church building, completed in 1697. It was replaced by the current structure in 1846. President Washington, who was an Episcopalian, didn’t attend Trinity but had a pew at St. Paul's Chapel on Broadway and Vesey Street, which remains just as it was when he worshipped there.

 

By the friends of the original bill, the amendment was opposed with arguments of great force drawn from the constitution and from general convenience. On several parts of the constitution, and especially on that which vests the executive power in the President, they relied confidently to support the position, that, in conformity with that instrument, the power in question could reside only with the chief magistrate: no power, it was said, could be more completely executive in its nature than that of removal from office.

By the supporters of the original bill, the amendment was strongly opposed with compelling arguments based on the constitution and practical considerations. They confidently referenced several parts of the constitution, particularly the section that grants executive power to the President, to support their view that, according to that document, this power could only rest with the chief executive: it was argued that no power could be more purely executive in nature than the power to remove someone from office.

But if it was a case on which the constitution was silent, the clearest principles of political expediency required that neither branch of the legislature should participate in it.

But if it was a situation where the constitution was silent, the clearest principles of political practicality demanded that neither branch of the legislature should get involved.

The danger that a President could ever be found who would remove good men from office, was treated as imaginary. It was not by the splendour attached to the character of the present chief magistrate alone that this opinion was to be defended. It was founded on the structure of the office. The man in whose favour a majority of the people of this continent would unite, had probability at least in favour of his principles; in addition to which, the public odium that would inevitably attach to such conduct, would be an effectual security against it.

The idea that a President could ever be found who would dismiss good people from their positions was seen as just a fantasy. This belief wasn't just based on the impressive reputation of the current leader. It was rooted in the way the office was set up. The person who would gain support from a majority of the people on this continent would likely have principles that align with the public's values; plus, the widespread backlash that would come from such actions would serve as a strong deterrent against it.

After an ardent discussion which consumed several days, the committee divided: and the amendment was negatived by a majority of thirty-four to twenty. The opinion thus expressed by the house of representatives did not explicitly convey their sense of the constitution. Indeed the express grant of the power to the President, rather implied a right in the legislature to give or withhold it at their discretion. To obviate any misunderstanding of the principle on which the question had been 'decided, Mr. Benson moved in the house, when the report of the committee of the whole was taken up, to amend the second clause in the bill so as clearly to imply the power of removal to be solely in the President. He gave notice that if he should succeed in this, he would move to strike out the words which had been the subject of debate. If those words continued, he said the power of removal by the President might hereafter appear to be exercised by virtue of a legislative grant only, and consequently be subjected to legislative instability; when he was well satisfied in his own mind, that it was by fair construction, fixed in the constitution. The motion was seconded by Mr. Madison, and both amendments were adopted. As the bill passed into a law, it has ever been considered as a full expression of the sense of the legislature on this important part of the American constitution.

After an intense discussion that lasted several days, the committee split, and the amendment was rejected by a majority of thirty-four to twenty. The opinion expressed by the House of Representatives did not clearly reflect their stance on the Constitution. In fact, the explicit grant of power to the President suggested that the legislature had the right to give or withhold that power at their discretion. To prevent any misunderstanding of the principle on which the question had been decided, Mr. Benson moved in the House, when the report of the committee of the whole was reviewed, to amend the second clause in the bill to clearly state that the power of removal belonged solely to the President. He announced that if he succeeded in this, he would propose to remove the words that had been debated. He argued that if those words remained, it might seem that the President's power of removal was based only on a legislative grant, and therefore subject to legislative instability; he believed it was established by a fair construction of the Constitution. The motion was seconded by Mr. Madison, and both amendments were approved. Once the bill became law, it has been regarded as a complete expression of the legislature's view on this crucial aspect of the American Constitution.

On the policy of the secretary of the treasury reporting plans for the management of the revenue.

The bill to establish the treasury department, contained a clause making it the duty of the secretary "to digest and report plans for the improvement and management of the revenue, and for the support of public credit."

The bill to create the treasury department included a clause requiring the secretary "to outline and present plans for improving and managing the revenue, and for supporting public credit."

Mr. Page moved to strike out these words, observing, that to permit the secretary to go further than to prepare estimates would be a dangerous innovation on the constitutional privilege of that house. It would create an undue influence within those walls, because members might be led by the deference commonly paid to men of abilities, who gave an opinion in a case they have thoroughly considered, to support the plan of the minister even against their own judgment. Nor would the mischief stop there. A precedent would be established which might be extended until ministers of the government should be admitted on that floor, to explain and support the plans they had digested and reported, thereby laying a foundation for an aristocracy, or a detestable monarchy.

Mr. Page moved to remove these words, noting that allowing the secretary to do more than just prepare estimates would be a risky departure from the constitutional privileges of that house. It would create undue influence within those walls, as members might be swayed by the respect usually shown to capable individuals who offer a well-considered opinion, leading them to back the minister's plan even against their better judgment. And the problems wouldn’t stop there. A precedent would be set that could eventually allow government ministers to come onto that floor to explain and advocate for their plans, laying the groundwork for an aristocracy or an unwanted monarchy.

Mr. Tucker seconded the motion of Mr. Page, and observed, that the authority contained in the bill to prepare and report plans would create an interference of the executive with the legislative powers, and would abridge the particular privilege of that house to originate all bills for raising a revenue. How could the business originate in that house, if it was reported to them by the minister of finance? All the information that could be required might be called for without adopting a clause that might undermine the authority of the house, and the security of the people. The constitution has pointed out the proper method of communication between the executive and legislative departments. It is made the duty of the President to give from time to time information to congress of the state of the union, and to recommend to their consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient. If revenue plans are to be prepared and reported to congress, he is the proper person to perform this service. He is responsible to the people for what he recommends, and will be more cautious than any other person to whom a less degree of responsibility was attached.

Mr. Tucker supported Mr. Page's motion and pointed out that the authority given in the bill to create and report plans would interfere with the executive's role in the legislative powers and would limit the specific privilege of that house to start all bills for generating revenue. How could this business start in that house if it was brought to them by the finance minister? All the information needed could be requested without including a clause that might weaken the authority of the house and the security of the people. The constitution has laid out the right way for communication between the executive and legislative branches. It is the President’s duty to inform Congress from time to time about the state of the union and to suggest measures that he believes are necessary and appropriate. If revenue plans are to be created and presented to Congress, he is the right person to handle this task. He is accountable to the people for what he proposes and will be more careful than anyone else who has less responsibility.

He hoped the house was not already weary of executing and sustaining the powers vested in them by the constitution; and yet the adoption of this clause would argue that they thought themselves less adequate than an individual, to determine what burdens their constituents were able to bear. This was not answering the high expectation that had been formed of their exertions for the general good, or of their vigilance in guarding their own and the people's rights.

He hoped the house wasn't already tired of carrying out and upholding the powers given to them by the constitution; yet, adopting this clause would suggest they believed they were less capable than an individual to decide what burdens their constituents could handle. This didn't meet the high expectations set for their efforts towards the common good or their vigilance in protecting their own rights and those of the people.

The arguments of Mr. Page and Mr. Tucker were enforced and enlarged by Mr. Livermore and Mr. Gerry. The latter gentleman said, "that he had no objection to obtaining information, but he could not help observing the great degree of importance gentlemen were giving to this and the other executive officers. If the doctrine of having prime and great ministers of state was once well established, he did not doubt but he should soon see them distinguished by a green or red ribbon, insignia of court favour and patronage."

The points made by Mr. Page and Mr. Tucker were reinforced and expanded upon by Mr. Livermore and Mr. Gerry. The latter remarked, "I have no issue with gathering information, but I can't help but notice the excessive importance that people are placing on this and other executive roles. If the idea of having prominent ministers of state becomes well established, I have no doubt we will soon see them marked by a green or red ribbon, symbols of court favor and patronage."

It was contended that the plans of the secretary, being digested, would be received entire. Members would be informed that each part was necessary to the whole, and that nothing could be touched without injuring the system. Establish this doctrine, and congress would become a useless burden.

It was argued that the secretary's plans, once fully processed, would be accepted in their entirety. Members would be told that every part was essential to the whole and that altering anything would harm the system. Establish this belief, and Congress would become a pointless burden.

The amendment was opposed by Mr. Benson, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Ames, Mr. Sedgewick, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Madison, Mr. Stone, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Baldwin. It was insisted that to prepare and report plans for the improvement of the revenue, and support of public credit, constituted the most important service which could be rendered by the officer who should be placed at the head of the department of finance. When the circumstances under which the members of that house were assembled, and the various objects for which they were convened were considered, it was no imputation upon them to suppose that they might receive useful information from a person whose peculiar duty it was to direct his attention to systems of finance, and who would be in some measure selected on account of his fitness for that object. It was denied that the privileges of the house would be infringed by the measure. The plans of the secretary could not be termed bills, nor would they even be reported in that form. They would only constitute information which would be valuable, and which could not be received in a more eligible mode. "Certainly," said Mr. Goodhue, "we carry our dignity to the extreme, when we refuse to receive information from any but ourselves."

The amendment was opposed by Mr. Benson, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Ames, Mr. Sedgewick, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Madison, Mr. Stone, Mr. Sherman, and Mr. Baldwin. They argued that preparing and presenting plans for improving revenue and supporting public credit was the most important job of the head of the finance department. Considering the circumstances under which the members of that house had gathered and the various reasons for their meeting, it wasn’t unreasonable to think they could gain valuable insights from someone whose main responsibility was to focus on financial systems and who was chosen in part for their expertise in that area. They denied that the house's privileges would be compromised by this measure. The secretary's proposals wouldn't be called bills, nor would they be presented in that way. They would simply provide valuable information that couldn’t be obtained more effectively. "Certainly," said Mr. Goodhue, "we take our dignity too far when we refuse to receive information from anyone but ourselves."

"If we consider the present situation of our finances," said Mr. Ames, "owing to a variety of causes, we shall no doubt perceive a great though unavoidable confusion throughout the whole scene. It presents to the imagination a deep, dark, and dreary chaos, impossible to be reduced to order, unless the mind of the architect be clear and capacious, and his power commensurate to the object. He must not be the flitting creature of the day; he must have time given him competent to the successful exercise of his authority. It is with the intention of letting a little sunshine into the business, that the present arrangement is proposed."

"If we look at our current financial situation," said Mr. Ames, "due to various reasons, it’s clear there’s significant but unavoidable confusion all around. It paints a picture of deep, dark, and dreary chaos that can't be organized unless the architect's mind is clear and capable, and his power matches the task at hand. He shouldn't be someone who just flits in and out; he needs enough time to effectively exercise his authority. This proposal aims to bring some clarity and positivity into the situation."

It was not admitted that the plans of the secretary would possess an influence to which their intrinsic value would not give them a just claim. There would always be sufficient intelligence in that house to detect, and independence to expose any oppressive or injurious scheme which might be prepared for them. Nor would a plan openly and officially reported possess more influence on the mind of any member, than if given privately at the secretary's office.

It was not acknowledged that the secretary's plans would have an impact that their actual value didn't rightfully deserve. There would always be enough intelligence in that house to identify and the independence to reveal any unfair or harmful scheme that might be created for them. Additionally, a plan that was reported openly and officially wouldn't have any more influence on a member's mind than if it were shared privately at the secretary's office.

Mr. Madison said, the words of the bill were precisely those used by the former congress on two occasions. The same power had been annexed to the office of superintendent of the finances; and he had never heard that any inconvenience had been experienced from the regulation. Perhaps if the power had been more fully and more frequently exercised, it might have contributed more to the public good. "There is," continued this gentleman, "a small probability, though it is but small, that an officer may derive weight from this circumstance, and have some degree of influence upon the deliberations of the legislature. But compare the danger likely to result from this cause, with the danger and inconvenience of not having well formed and digested plans, and we shall find infinitely more to apprehend from the latter. Inconsistent, unproductive, and expensive schemes, will produce greater injury to our constituents, than is to be apprehended from any undue influence which the well digested plans of a well informed officer can have. From a bad administration of the government, more detriment will arise than from any other source. Want of information has occasioned much inconvenience, and many unnecessary burdens in some of the state governments. Let it be our care to avoid those rocks and shoals in our political voyage which have injured, and nearly proved fatal to many of our contemporary navigators."

Mr. Madison said that the language of the bill was exactly the same as what was used by the previous congress on two occasions. The same power had been attached to the role of superintendent of finances, and he had never heard of any issues arising from that regulation. Perhaps if the power had been used more fully and more frequently, it could have benefitted the public more. "There is," he continued, "a slight chance, though it is minimal, that an officer might gain influence from this situation and sway the legislature's discussions. But if we weigh the potential dangers of this against the risks and problems from not having well-structured and thought-out plans, we will see that there is a far greater risk from the latter. Inconsistent, unproductive, and costly plans will hurt our constituents more than we need to fear any undue influence from the carefully considered plans of a knowledgeable officer. Poor governance will cause more harm than any other issue. Lack of information has led to many problems and unnecessary hardships in some state governments. We should be careful to avoid the pitfalls in our political journey that have harmed and nearly brought down many of our fellow leaders."

The amendment was rejected.

The amendment got rejected.

On the style by which the president should be addressed.

Among the interesting points which were settled in the first congress, was the question by what style the President and Vice President should be addressed. Mr. Benson, from the committee appointed to confer with a committee of the senate on this subject reported, "that it is not proper to annex any style or title to the respective styles or titles of office expressed in the constitution;" and this report was, without opposition, agreed to in the house of representatives. In the senate, the report was disapproved, and a resolution passed requesting the house of representatives to appoint another committee, again to confer with one from the senate, on the same subject. This message being taken up in the house of representatives, a resolution was moved by Mr. Parker, seconded by Mr. Page, declaring that it would be improper to accede to the request of the senate. Several members were in favour of this motion; but others who were opposed to receding from the ground already taken, seemed inclined to appoint a committee as a measure properly respectful to the other branch of the legislature.

Among the interesting points settled in the first congress was how the President and Vice President should be addressed. Mr. Benson, from the committee assigned to discuss this with a committee from the Senate, reported, "it is not appropriate to add any style or title to the respective titles of office stated in the constitution;" and this report was agreed to without opposition in the House of Representatives. In the Senate, the report was rejected, and a resolution was passed requesting the House of Representatives to appoint another committee to again confer with one from the Senate on the same topic. When this message was brought up in the House of Representatives, a resolution was proposed by Mr. Parker, seconded by Mr. Page, stating that it would be inappropriate to agree to the Senate's request. Several members supported this motion; however, others who opposed stepping back from their stance seemed inclined to form a committee as a more respectful approach to the other branch of the legislature.

After a warm debate, the resolution proposed by Mr. Parker was set aside by the previous question, and a committee of conference was appointed. They could not agree upon a report, in consequence of which the subject was permitted to rest; and the senate, conforming to the precedent given by the house of representatives, addressed the President in their answer to his speech by the terms used in the constitution.

After a lively debate, Mr. Parker's resolution was put on hold by the previous question, and a conference committee was formed. They were unable to come to an agreement on a report, so the topic was allowed to sit; and the Senate, following the example set by the House of Representatives, responded to the President in their reply to his speech using the terms specified in the Constitution.

While the representatives were preparing bills for organizing the great executive departments, the senate was occupied with digesting the system of a national judiciary. This complex and extensive subject was taken up in the commencement of the session, and was completed towards its close.

While the representatives were drafting bills to set up the major executive departments, the Senate was busy working on the structure of a national judiciary. This complicated and broad topic was addressed at the start of the session and finished toward the end.

Amendment to the constitution proposed by congress and ratified by the states.

In the course of this session Mr. Madison brought forward a proposition for recommending to the consideration and adoption of the states, several new articles to be added to the constitution.

During this session, Mr. Madison presented a proposal to recommend that the states consider and adopt several new articles to be added to the constitution.

Many of those objections to it which had been urged with all the vehemence of conviction, and which, in the opinion of some of its advocates, were entitled to serious consideration, were believed by the most intelligent to derive their sole support from erroneous construction of the instrument. Others were upon points on which the objectors might be gratified without injury to the system. To conciliate the affections of their brethren to the government, was an object greatly desired by its friends. Disposed to respect, what they deemed, the errors of their opponents, where that respect could be manifested without a sacrifice of essential principles, they were anxious to annex to the constitution those explanations and barriers against the possible encroachments of rulers on the liberties of the people, which had been loudly demanded, however unfounded, in their judgments, might be the fears by which those demands were suggested. These dispositions were perhaps, in some measure, stimulated to exertion by motives of the soundest policy. The formidable minorities in several of the conventions, which in the legislatures of some powerful states had become majorities, and the refusal of two states to complete the union, were admonitions not to be disregarded, of the necessity of removing jealousies, however misplaced, which operated on so large a portion of society. Among the most zealous friends of the constitution therefore, were found some of the first and warmest advocates for amendments.

Many of the objections raised against it, which had been expressed with strong conviction and were considered by some of its supporters to be worthy of serious attention, were thought by the more informed individuals to come mainly from a misunderstanding of the document. Other objections were about points where the critics could be appeased without harming the overall system. Winning over the support of their fellow citizens for the government was a key goal for its supporters. They were inclined to respect what they saw as the mistakes of their opponents, as long as that respect didn't require sacrificing essential principles. They wanted to add to the constitution the clarifications and safeguards against potential overreach by leaders on the freedoms of the people, even if the fears driving those demands seemed unwarranted to them. These attitudes were likely encouraged by solid policy motivations. The strong minorities in several conventions, which had turned into majorities in the legislatures of some influential states, along with the refusal of two states to finalize the union, were clear warnings not to be ignored about the need to dispel any misplaced fears affecting such a large part of society. Therefore, among the most passionate supporters of the constitution were some of its staunchest advocates for amendments.

To meet the various ideas expressed by the several conventions; to select from the mass of alterations which they had proposed those which might be adopted without stripping the government of its necessary powers; to condense them into a form and compass which would be acceptable to persons disposed to indulge the caprice, and to adopt the language of their particular states; were labours not easily to be accomplished. But the greatest difficulty to be surmounted was, the disposition to make those alterations which would enfeeble, and materially injure, the future operations of the government. At length, ten articles in addition to and amendment of the constitution, were assented to by two-thirds of both houses of congress, and proposed to the legislatures of the several states. Although the necessity of these amendments had been urged by the enemies of the constitution, and denied by its friends, they encountered scarcely any other opposition in the state legislatures, than was given by the leaders of the anti-federal party. Admitting the articles to be good and necessary, it was contended that they were not sufficient for the security of liberty; and the apprehension was avowed that their adoption would quiet the fears of the people, and check the pursuit of those radical alterations which would afford a safe and adequate protection to their rights. They were at length ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states, and probably contributed, in some degree, to diminish the jealousies which had been imbibed against the constitution.

To address the various ideas put forward by the different conventions; to choose from the many changes they had suggested those that could be accepted without taking away the government's essential powers; to streamline them into a format and scope that would appeal to individuals likely to indulge their whims, and to use the language of their specific states; was no easy task. However, the biggest challenge was overcoming the tendency to make changes that would weaken and significantly harm the future functioning of the government. Eventually, ten articles to add to and amend the constitution were agreed upon by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and sent to the legislatures of the various states. Although the need for these amendments was pushed by the constitution's opponents and denied by its supporters, there was hardly any significant opposition in the state legislatures, other than from the leaders of the anti-federal party. Accepting that the articles were good and necessary, they argued that they were not enough to ensure liberty; there was a stated concern that adopting them would alleviate the public's fears and hinder the quest for substantial changes that would provide proper and safe protection for their rights. Eventually, they were ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states, likely helping to reduce some of the doubts that had been harbored against the constitution.

Appointment of the officers of the cabinet, council and of the judges.

The government being completely organized, and a system of revenue established, the important duty of filling the offices which had been created, remained to be performed. In the execution of this delicate trust, the purest virtue and the most impartial judgment were exercised in selecting the best talents, and the greatest weight of character, which the United States could furnish. The unmingled patriotism of the motives by which the President was actuated, would receive its clearest demonstration from a view of all his private letters on this subject: and the success of his endeavours is attested by the abilities and reputation which he drew into the public service.

With the government fully organized and a revenue system in place, the crucial task of filling the newly created offices was left to do. In carrying out this sensitive responsibility, the highest integrity and most impartial judgment were applied to choose the best talents and the strongest character that the United States had to offer. The President's pure patriotism driving his motives would be most clearly shown through all his private letters on this matter; and the success of his efforts is proven by the skills and reputations he brought into public service.

At the head of the department of foreign affairs, since denominated the department of state, he placed Mr. Jefferson.

At the head of the department of foreign affairs, now called the department of state, he appointed Mr. Jefferson.

This gentleman had been bred to the bar, and at an early period of life, had acquired considerable reputation for extensive attainments in the science of politics. He had been a distinguished member of the second congress, and had been offered a diplomatic appointment, which he had declined. Withdrawing from the administration of continental affairs, he had been elected governor of Virginia, which office he filled for two years. He afterwards again represented his native state in the councils of the union, and in the year 1784, was appointed to succeed Dr. Franklin at the court of Versailles. In that station, he had acquitted himself much to the public satisfaction. His Notes on Virginia, which were read with applause, were believed to evince the soundness of his political opinions; and the Declaration of Independence was universally ascribed to his pen. He had long been placed by America amongst the most eminent of her citizens, and had long been classed by the President with those who were most capable of serving the nation. Having lately obtained permission to return for a short time to the United States, he was, while on his passage, nominated to this important office; and, on his arrival in Virginia, found a letter from the President, giving him the option of becoming the secretary of foreign affairs, or of retaining his station at the court of Versailles. He appears rather to have inclined to continue in his foreign appointment; and, in changing his situation, to have consulted the wishes of the first magistrate more than the preference of his own mind.

This gentleman had been trained as a lawyer, and early on in his life, he gained a solid reputation for his broad knowledge of politics. He was a prominent member of the second congress and was offered a diplomatic role, which he turned down. After stepping away from the management of continental matters, he was elected governor of Virginia, a position he held for two years. He later represented his home state again in the national government, and in 1784, he was appointed to succeed Dr. Franklin at the court of Versailles. In that role, he performed very well, earning public praise. His "Notes on Virginia," which received much acclaim, were considered to reflect the soundness of his political views, and the Declaration of Independence was widely attributed to him. America had long recognized him as one of its most distinguished citizens, and the President had ranked him among those most capable of serving the country. Recently given permission to return to the United States for a short time, he was nominated for this significant position while en route. Upon arriving in Virginia, he found a letter from the President, offering him the choice between becoming the secretary of foreign affairs or keeping his post at the court of Versailles. It seems he was more inclined to stay in his foreign position, prioritizing the wishes of the President over his own preferences.

The task of restoring public credit, of drawing order and arrangement from the chaotic confusion in which the finances of America were involved, and of devising means which should render the revenue productive, and commensurate with the demand, in a manner least burdensome to the people, was justly classed among the most arduous of the duties which devolved on the new government. In discharging it, much aid was expected from the head of the treasury. This important, and, at that time, intricate department, was assigned to Colonel Hamilton.

The job of restoring public credit, bringing order and organization to the chaotic state of America's finances, and finding ways to make the revenue effective and sufficient for the demand, while also being as least burdensome to the people as possible, was rightly seen as one of the toughest responsibilities faced by the new government. To tackle this, a lot of help was anticipated from the head of the treasury. This crucial and, at that time, complex department was given to Colonel Hamilton.

This gentleman was a native of the island of St. Croix, and, at a very early period of life, had been placed by his friends, in New York. Possessing an ardent temper, he caught fire from the concussions of the moment, and, with all the enthusiasm of youth, engaged first his pen, and afterwards his sword, in the stern contest between the American colonies and their parent state. Among the first troops raised by New York was a corps of artillery, in which he was appointed a captain. Soon after the war was transferred to the Hudson, his superior endowments recommended him to the attention of the Commander-in-chief, into whose family, before completing his twenty-first year, he was invited to enter. Equally brave and intelligent, he continued, in this situation, to display a degree of firmness and capacity which commanded the confidence and esteem of his general, and of the principal officers in the army.

This guy was from the island of St. Croix and, at a very young age, was sent by his family to New York. He had a fiery spirit and was quickly influenced by the events of his time. With all the enthusiasm of youth, he first took up his pen and later his sword in the serious fight between the American colonies and Britain. One of the first regiments raised by New York was an artillery unit, where he was appointed captain. Soon after the war moved to the Hudson River, his exceptional abilities caught the attention of the Commander-in-chief, who invited him to join his family before he turned twenty-one. Brave and smart, he continued in this role, showing a level of determination and skill that earned the trust and respect of his general and the top officers in the army.

After the capitulation at Yorktown, the war languished throughout the American continent, and the probability that its termination was approaching daily increased.

After the surrender at Yorktown, the war dragged on across the American continent, and the likelihood that it would come to an end grew stronger with each passing day.

The critical circumstances of the existing government rendered the events of the civil, more interesting than those of the military department; and Colonel Hamilton accepted a seat in the congress of the United States. In all the important acts of the day, he performed a conspicuous part; and was greatly distinguished among those distinguished men whom the crisis had attracted to the councils of their country. He had afterwards been active in promoting those measures which led to the convention at Philadelphia, of which he was a member, and had greatly contributed to the adoption of the constitution by the state of New York. In the pre-eminent part he had performed, both in the military and civil transactions of his country, he had acquired a great degree of well merited fame; and the frankness of his manners, the openness of his temper, the warmth of his feelings, and the sincerity of his heart, had secured him many valuable friends.

The challenging situation of the current government made the events of the civil sector more intriguing than those of the military; so, Colonel Hamilton took a seat in the United States Congress. He played a significant role in all the major actions of the time and stood out among the notable individuals who were drawn to the government during this crisis. He was later active in supporting the measures that led to the Philadelphia convention, where he was a member, and he played a crucial role in the adoption of the constitution by the state of New York. Through his prominent involvement in both military and civil matters of his country, he earned a well-deserved reputation; and his straightforward manner, open personality, passionate emotions, and genuine heart gained him many valuable friends.

To talents equally splendid and useful, he united a patient industry, not always the companion of genius, which fitted him, in a peculiar manner, for subduing the difficulties to be encountered by the man who should be placed at the head of the American finances.

To equally outstanding and useful talents, he added a diligent work ethic, which isn't always found alongside genius. This unique combination prepared him well for overcoming the challenges faced by someone leading American finances.

The department of war was already filled by General Knox, and he was again nominated to it.

The Department of War was already led by General Knox, and he was nominated to it again.

Throughout the contest of the revolution, this officer had continued at the head of the American artillery, and from being the colonel of a regiment, had been promoted to the rank of a major general. In this important station, he had preserved a high military character; and, on the resignation of General Lincoln, had been appointed secretary of war. To his past services, and to unquestionable integrity, he was admitted to unite a sound understanding; and the public judgment, as well as that of the chief magistrate, pronounced him in all respects competent to the station he filled.

Throughout the revolution, this officer had remained in charge of the American artillery, and from the rank of colonel of a regiment, he had been promoted to major general. In this significant role, he maintained a strong military reputation; and, after General Lincoln resigned, he was appointed secretary of war. Along with his previous service and unquestionable integrity, he was recognized for his sound judgment; both public opinion and that of the president agreed that he was fully capable of the position he occupied.

The office of attorney general was filled by Mr. Edmund Randolph. To a distinguished reputation in the line of his profession, this gentleman added a considerable degree of political eminence. After having been for several years the attorney general of Virginia, he had been elected its governor. While in this office, he was chosen a member of the convention which framed the constitution, and was also elected to that which was called by the state for its adoption or rejection. After having served at the head of the executive the term permitted by the constitution of the state, he entered into its legislature, where he preserved a great share of influence.

The position of attorney general was held by Mr. Edmund Randolph. Along with a respected reputation in his profession, he also gained significant political prominence. After serving for several years as the attorney general of Virginia, he was elected governor. During his time in this role, he was selected to be a member of the convention that created the constitution and was also elected to the convention called by the state for its adoption or rejection. After completing the term as the head of the executive branch as allowed by the state constitution, he joined its legislature, where he maintained considerable influence.

Such was the first cabinet council of the President. In its composition, public opinion as well as intrinsic worth had been consulted, and a high degree of character had been combined with real talent.

This was the first cabinet meeting of the President. In putting it together, both public opinion and genuine merit were taken into account, and a strong sense of character was blended with actual talent.

In the selection of persons for high judicial offices, the President was guided by the same principles. At the head of this department he placed Mr. John Jay.

In choosing people for top judicial positions, the President followed the same principles. He appointed Mr. John Jay as the head of this department.

From the commencement of the revolution, this gentleman had filled a large space in the public mind. Remaining, without intermission, in the service of his country, he had passed through a succession of high offices, and, in all of them, had merited the approbation of his fellow citizens. To his pen, while in congress, America was indebted for some of those masterly addresses which reflected most honour upon the government; and to his firmness and penetration, was to be ascribed, in no inconsiderable degree, the happy issue of those intricate negotiations, which were conducted, towards the close of the war, at Madrid, and at Paris. On returning to the United States, he had been appointed secretary of foreign affairs, in which station he had conducted himself with his accustomed ability. A sound judgment improved by extensive reading and great knowledge of public affairs, unyielding firmness, and inflexible integrity, were qualities of which Mr. Jay had given frequent and signal proofs. Although for some years withdrawn from that profession to which he was bred, the acquisitions of his early life had not been lost; and the subjects on which his mind had been exercised, were not entirely foreign from those which would, in the first instance, employ the courts in which he was to preside.

From the start of the revolution, this gentleman had occupied a prominent place in the public's consciousness. Consistently serving his country, he held a series of high offices and earned the respect of his fellow citizens in each role. During his time in Congress, America relied on his writing for some of the impressive speeches that brought significant honor to the government. His determination and insight played a crucial role in the successful outcome of the complex negotiations that took place near the end of the war in Madrid and Paris. Upon returning to the United States, he was appointed Secretary of Foreign Affairs, where he performed with his usual skill. He demonstrated sound judgment, enhanced by extensive reading and deep knowledge of public affairs, unyielding resolve, and unwavering integrity—qualities Mr. Jay frequently and remarkably displayed. Although he had stepped away from the profession for several years, the knowledge he gained in his early life was still intact, and the topics he had engaged with weren't entirely disconnected from those he would first encounter in the courts he was to oversee.

John Rutledge of South Carolina, James Wilson of Pennsylvania, William Cushing of Massachusetts, Robert Harrison of Maryland, and John Blair of Virginia were nominated as associate justices. Some of these gentlemen had filled the highest law offices in their respective states; and all of them had received distinguished marks of the public confidence.

John Rutledge of South Carolina, James Wilson of Pennsylvania, William Cushing of Massachusetts, Robert Harrison of Maryland, and John Blair of Virginia were nominated as associate justices. Some of these individuals had held the highest legal positions in their states, and all of them had earned significant public trust.

In the systems which had been adopted by the several states, offices corresponding to those created by the revenue laws of congress, had been already established. Uninfluenced by considerations of personal regard, the President could not be induced to change men whom he found in place, if worthy of being employed; and where the man who had filled such office in the former state of things was unexceptionable in his conduct and character, he was uniformly re-appointed. In deciding between competitors for vacant offices, the law he prescribed for his government was to regard the fitness of candidates for the duties they would be required to discharge; and, where an equality in this respect existed, former merits and sufferings in the public service, gave claims to preference which could not be overlooked.

In the systems adopted by the various states, offices that corresponded to those created by Congress's revenue laws had already been set up. Unaffected by personal feelings, the President could not be persuaded to replace individuals he found competent in their roles; if a person who previously held an office performed well and had a good reputation, he was consistently reappointed. When choosing between candidates for open positions, the guiding principle was to assess the suitability of applicants for the responsibilities they would take on, and when candidates were equally qualified, their past service and sacrifices for the public good were given preference that could not be ignored.

In the legislative, as well as in the executive and judicial departments, great respectability of character was also associated with an eminent degree of talents. The constitutional prohibition to appoint any member of the legislature to an office created during the time for which he had been elected, did not exclude men of the most distinguished abilities from the first congress. Impelled by an anxious solicitude respecting the first measures of the government, its zealous friends had pressed into its service: and, in both branches of the legislature, men were found who possessed the fairest claims to the public confidence.

In the legislative, as well as in the executive and judicial branches, there was a strong respectability of character coupled with a high level of skill. The constitutional rule that prevented any member of the legislature from being appointed to an office created during their elected term did not keep highly capable individuals out of the first congress. Driven by a deep concern about the initial actions of the government, its dedicated supporters brought forth their talents: and in both branches of the legislature, there were individuals who had the best claims to the public's trust.

From the duties attached to his office, the Vice President of the United States, and President of the senate, though not a member of the legislature, was classed, in the public mind, with that department not less than with the executive. Elected by the whole people of America in common with the President, he could not fail to be taken from the most distinguished citizens, and to add to the dignity of the body over which he presided.

From the responsibilities of his position, the Vice President of the United States, who also serves as the President of the Senate, was considered by the public to be associated with the legislative branch just as much as with the executive branch, even though he isn’t an actual member of the legislature. Elected by all the people of America alongside the President, he was naturally chosen from among the most distinguished citizens, which enhanced the dignity of the body he led.

Mr. John Adams was one of the earliest and most ardent patriots of the revolution. Bred to the bar, he had necessarily studied the constitution of his country, and was among the most determined asserters of its rights. Active in guiding that high spirit which animated all New England, he became a member of the congress of 1774, and was among the first who dared to avow sentiments in favour of independence. In that body he soon attained considerable eminence; and, at an early stage of the war, was chosen one of the commissioners to whom the interests of the United States in Europe were confided. In his diplomatic character, he had contributed greatly to those measures which drew Holland into the war; had negotiated the treaty between the United States and the Dutch republic: and had, at critical points of time, obtained loans of money which were of great advantage to his country. In the negotiations which terminated the war, he had also rendered important services; and, after the ratification of the definitive articles of peace, had been deputed to Great Britain for the purpose of effecting a commercial treaty with that nation. The political situation of America having rendered this object unattainable, he solicited leave to return, and arrived in the United States soon after the adoption of the constitution.

Mr. John Adams was one of the earliest and most passionate supporters of the revolution. Trained as a lawyer, he studied the constitution of his country and was one of the strongest defenders of its rights. Actively involved in the spirited movement across New England, he became a member of the Congress of 1774 and was among the first to openly support independence. He quickly rose to prominence in that group and, early in the war, was appointed one of the commissioners responsible for representing the interests of the United States in Europe. In his role as a diplomat, he significantly contributed to efforts that brought Holland into the war, negotiated the treaty between the United States and the Dutch Republic, and secured crucial loans at key moments that greatly benefited his country. He also played an important role in the negotiations that ended the war and, after the ratification of the final peace agreement, was sent to Great Britain to pursue a commercial treaty with that nation. However, as the political situation in America made this goal impossible, he requested permission to return and arrived in the United States shortly after the constitution was adopted.

As a statesman, this gentleman had, at all times, ranked high in the estimation of his countrymen. He had improved a sound understanding by extensive political and historical reading; and perhaps no American had reflected more profoundly on the subject of government. The exalted opinion he entertained of his own country was flattering to his fellow citizens; and the purity of his mind, the unblemished integrity of a life spent in the public service, had gained him their confidence.

As a politician, this man has always been held in high regard by his fellow citizens. He enhanced his strong understanding through extensive political and historical reading, and perhaps no American has thought more deeply about government. His high regard for his own country was flattering to his fellow citizens, and the clarity of his mind, along with his impeccable integrity from a life dedicated to public service, earned him their trust.

A government, supported in all its departments by so much character and talent, at the head of which was placed a man whose capacity was undoubted, whose life had been one great and continued lesson of disinterested patriotism, and for whom almost every bosom glowed with an attachment bordering on enthusiasm, could not fail to make a rapid progress in conciliating the affection of the people. That all hostility to the constitution should subside, that public measures should receive universal approbation; that no particular disgusts and individual irritations should be excited; were expectations which could not reasonably be indulged. Exaggerated accounts were indeed occasionally circulated of the pomp and splendour which were affected by certain high officers, of the monarchical tendencies of particular institutions, and of the dispositions which prevailed to increase the powers of the executive. That the doors of the senate were closed, and that a disposition had been manifested by that body to distinguish the President of the United States by a title,[43] gave considerable umbrage, and were represented as evincing inclinations in that branch of the legislature, unfriendly to republicanism. The exorbitance of salaries was also a subject of some declamation, and the equality of commercial privileges with which foreign bottoms entered American ports, was not free from objection. But the apprehensions of danger to liberty from the new system, which had been impressed on the minds of well meaning men, were visibly wearing off; the popularity of the administration was communicating itself to the government; and the materials with which the discontented were furnished, could not yet be efficaciously employed.

A government, backed by so much character and talent in all its departments, led by a man whose abilities were beyond question, whose life had been a continuous lesson in selfless patriotism, and for whom nearly everyone felt a deep attachment bordering on enthusiasm, was bound to quickly gain the support of the people. It was unrealistic to expect that all hostility toward the constitution would fade away, that public policies would receive universal approval, or that individual grievances and irritations wouldn't arise. There were indeed exaggerated claims circulated about the pomp and extravagance displayed by certain high-ranking officials, about the monarchial tendencies of some institutions, and about the inclination to increase executive power. The fact that the doors of the senate were shut, and that this body seemed inclined to distinguish the President of the United States with a title,[43] caused significant discontent and was portrayed as showing unfriendly feelings towards republicanism. The high salaries were also a topic of criticism, and the equality of commercial privileges that allowed foreign ships to enter American ports faced scrutiny. However, the fears regarding liberty posed by the new system, which had been instilled in the minds of well-meaning individuals, were clearly diminishing; the administration's popularity was starting to affect the government positively, and the resources available to the discontented were not yet effectively utilized.

Towards the close of the session, a report on a petition which had been presented at an early period by the creditors of the public residing in the state of Pennsylvania, was taken up in the house of representatives. Though many considerations rendered a postponement of this interesting subject necessary, two resolutions were passed; the one, "declaring that the house considered an adequate provision for the support of the public credit, as a matter of high importance to the national honour and prosperity;" and the other directing, "the secretary of the treasury to prepare a plan for that purpose, and to report the same to the house at its next meeting."

Towards the end of the session, the House of Representatives addressed a report on a petition submitted earlier by the creditors of the state of Pennsylvania. Although several reasons made it necessary to postpone this important topic, two resolutions were passed: one stating that the House recognized the need for a strong support system for public credit as crucial for the nation’s honor and prosperity; and the other directing the Secretary of the Treasury to create a plan for that purpose and present it to the House at the next meeting.

Adjournment of the first session of congress.

On the 29th of September, congress adjourned to the first Monday in the succeeding January.

On September 29th, Congress adjourned until the first Monday in the following January.

Throughout the whole of this laborious and important session, perfect harmony subsisted between the executive and the legislature; and no circumstance occurred which threatened to impair it. The modes of communication between the departments of government were adjusted in a satisfactory manner, and arrangements were made on some of those delicate points in which the senate participate of executive power.

Throughout this entire challenging and important session, there was complete harmony between the executive and the legislature, and nothing happened that threatened to disrupt it. The ways of communicating between the branches of government were set up effectively, and agreements were reached on some of the sensitive issues where the Senate shares executive power.

The president visits the New England states.

Anxious to visit New England, to observe in person the condition of the country and the dispositions of the people towards the government and its measures, the President was disposed to avail himself of the short respite from official cares afforded by the recess of congress, to make a tour through the eastern states. His resolution being taken, and the executive business which required his immediate personal attendance being despatched,[44] he commenced his tour on the 15th of October; and, passing through Connecticut and Massachusetts, as far as Portsmouth in New Hampshire, returned by a different route to New York, where he arrived on the 13th of November.

Anxious to visit New England to see firsthand the state of the country and how the people felt about the government and its policies, the President decided to take advantage of the short break from official duties provided by the congressional recess to tour the eastern states. Once he made up his mind and finished the executive tasks that required his immediate attention,[44] he began his tour on October 15th. He traveled through Connecticut and Massachusetts, all the way to Portsmouth in New Hampshire, and took a different route back to New York, where he arrived on November 13th.

With this visit, the President had much reason to be satisfied. To contemplate the theatre on which many interesting military scenes had been exhibited, and to review the ground on which his first campaign as Commander-in-chief of the American army had been made, were sources of rational delight. To observe the progress of society, the improvements in agriculture, commerce, and manufactures; and the temper, circumstances, and dispositions of the people, could not fail to be grateful to an intelligent mind, and an employment in all respects, worthy of the chief magistrate of the nation. The reappearance of their general, in the high station he now filled, brought back to recollection the perilous transactions of the war; and the reception universally given to him, attested the unabated love which was felt for his person and character, and indicated unequivocally the growing popularity, at least in that part of the union, of the government he administered.

With this visit, the President had plenty of reasons to be pleased. Reflecting on the place where many interesting military events had taken place and revisiting the ground of his first campaign as Commander-in-Chief of the American army brought him genuine joy. Observing the progress of society, the advancements in agriculture, commerce, and manufacturing, as well as the mood, conditions, and attitudes of the people, was undoubtedly satisfying to an informed mind and a worthwhile endeavor for the leader of the nation. The return of their general, now in the prominent position he held, reminded everyone of the dangerous events of the war; the warm welcome he received from all confirmed the enduring affection for him and his character, clearly indicating the rising popularity of the government he led, at least in that part of the union.

His reception.

The sincerity and warmth with which he reciprocated the affection expressed for his person in the addresses presented to him, was well calculated to preserve the sentiments which were generally diffused. "I rejoice with you my fellow citizens," said he in answer to an address from the inhabitants of Boston, "in every circumstance that declares your prosperity;—and I do so most cordially because you have well deserved to be happy.

The sincerity and warmth with which he returned the affection shown to him in the speeches given to him was well designed to maintain the positive feelings that were widely shared. "I'm happy for you, my fellow citizens," he said in response to a speech from the people of Boston, "in every situation that shows your success;—and I say this sincerely because you truly deserve to be happy.

"Your love of liberty—your respect for the laws—your habits of industry—and your practice of the moral and religious obligations, are the strongest claims to national and individual happiness. And they will, I trust, be firmly and lastingly established."

"Your love for freedom—your respect for the law—your work ethic—and your commitment to moral and religious duties are the strongest foundations for both national and personal happiness. And I hope these values will be strongly and permanently upheld."

But the interchange of sentiments with the companions of his military toils and glory, will excite most interest, because on both sides, the expressions were dictated by the purest and most delicious feelings of the human heart. From the Cincinnati of Massachusetts he received the following address:

But the exchange of feelings with the comrades of his military struggles and achievements will draw the most interest, because on both sides, the words were inspired by the purest and most joyful feelings of the human heart. From the Cincinnati of Massachusetts, he received this address:

"Amidst the various gratulations which your arrival in this metropolis has occasioned, permit us, the members of the society of the Cincinnati in this commonwealth, most respectfully to assure you of the ardour of esteem and affection you have so indelibly fixed in our hearts, as our glorious leader in war, and illustrious example in peace.

"Amidst the many congratulations your arrival in this city has inspired, we, the members of the Society of the Cincinnati in this state, would like to sincerely express the deep respect and affection you have permanently established in our hearts, as our great leader in war and shining example in peace."

"After the solemn and endearing farewell on the banks of the Hudson, which our anxiety presaged as final, most peculiarly pleasing is the present unexpected meeting. On this occasion we can not avoid the recollection of the various scenes of toil and danger through which you conducted us; and while we contemplate various trying periods of the war, and the triumphs of peace, we rejoice to behold you, induced by the unanimous voice of your country, entering upon other trials, and other services alike important, and, in some points of view, equally hazardous. For the completion of the great purposes which a grateful country has assigned you, long, very long, may your invaluable life be preserved. And as the admiring world, while considering you as a soldier, have long wanted a comparison, may your virtue and talents as a statesman leave them without a parallel.

"After the heartfelt and emotional goodbye on the banks of the Hudson, which we feared would be the last, it’s surprisingly delightful to meet again. On this occasion, we can’t help but remember the various challenges and dangers you led us through; and as we reflect on the tough times of the war and the victories of peace, we are thrilled to see you, chosen by the united voice of your country, stepping into new challenges and important services that are, in some ways, just as risky. For the fulfillment of the great goals that a grateful nation has set for you, may your invaluable life be preserved for a long time. And as the world admires you as a soldier and seeks a comparison, may your qualities and skills as a statesman stand unmatched."

"It is not in words to express an attachment founded like ours. We can only say that when soldiers, our greatest pride was a promptitude of obedience to your orders; as citizens, our supreme ambition is to maintain the character of firm supporters of that noble fabric of federal government over which you preside.

"It’s hard to put into words the kind of bond we have. All we can say is that as soldiers, our greatest pride was our quick obedience to your commands; as citizens, our highest goal is to uphold the strong support of the wonderful structure of federal government that you lead."

"As members of the society of the Cincinnati, it will be our endeavour to cherish those sacred principles of charity and fraternal attachment which our institution inculcates. And while our conduct is thus regulated, we can never want the patronage of the first of patriots and the best of men."

"As members of the Society of the Cincinnati, we will strive to uphold the core values of charity and brotherhood that our organization promotes. With our actions guided by these principles, we will always have the support of the greatest patriots and the best people."

To this address the following answer was returned:

To this address, the following response was sent:

"In reciprocating with gratitude and sincerity the multiplied and affecting gratulations of my fellow citizens of this commonwealth, they will all of them with justice allow me to say, that none can be dearer to me than the affectionate assurances which you have expressed. Dear, indeed, is the occasion which restores an intercourse with my faithful associates in prosperous and adverse fortune; and enhanced are the triumphs of peace, participated with those whose virtue and valour so largely contributed to procure them. To that virtue and valour your country has confessed her obligations. Be mine the grateful task to add the testimony of a connexion which it was my pride to own in the field, and is now my happiness to acknowledge in the enjoyments of peace and freedom.

"Reflecting with gratitude and sincerity on the many heartfelt congratulations from my fellow citizens of this commonwealth, I believe they would all agree that none mean more to me than the kind words you’ve shared. This occasion, which renews my connection with my loyal friends through both good times and bad, is truly special; the victories of peace feel even more meaningful when shared with those whose bravery and character played such a significant role in achieving them. Your country recognizes its debt to that bravery and character. It is my privilege to express the appreciation I felt while serving alongside you in the field, and now, in celebrating our peace and freedom."

"Regulating your conduct by those principles which have heretofore governed your actions as men, soldiers, and citizens, you will repeat the obligations conferred on your country, and you will transmit to posterity an example that must command their admiration and grateful praise. Long may you continue to enjoy the endearments of fraternal attachments, and the heartfelt happiness of reflecting that you have faithfully done your duty.

"By following the principles that have guided your actions as men, soldiers, and citizens, you will uphold the obligations you've promised to your country, and you will leave behind an example that will earn the admiration and gratitude of future generations. May you enjoy the bonds of brotherhood and the genuine happiness that comes from knowing you have faithfully fulfilled your duty."

"While I am permitted to possess the consciousness of this worth, which has long bound me to you by every tie of affection and esteem, I will continue to be your sincere and faithful friend."

"Even though I can recognize the value of this bond, which has long connected me to you through every tie of love and respect, I will keep being your genuine and loyal friend."

Soon after his return to New York, the President was informed of the ill success which had attended his first attempt to negotiate a peace with the Creek Indians. General Lincoln, Mr. Griffin, and Colonel Humphries, had been deputed on this mission, and had met M'Gillivray with several other chiefs, and about two thousand men, at Rock landing, on the Oconee, on the frontiers of Georgia. The treaty commenced with favourable appearances, but was soon abruptly broken off by M'Gillivray. Some difficulties arose on the subject of a boundary, but the principal obstacles to a peace were supposed to grow out of his personal interests, and his connexions with Spain.

Soon after he returned to New York, the President was informed about the failed attempt to negotiate peace with the Creek Indians. General Lincoln, Mr. Griffin, and Colonel Humphries had been assigned this mission and had met M'Gillivray along with several other chiefs and around two thousand men at Rock landing on the Oconee in Georgia's frontier. The treaty started off positively, but was soon abruptly ended by M'Gillivray. Some issues came up regarding the boundary, but the main barriers to peace were believed to stem from his personal interests and his connections with Spain.

North Carolina accedes to the union.

This intelligence was more than counterbalanced by the accession of North Carolina to the union. In the month of November, a second convention had met under the authority of the legislature of that state, and the constitution was adopted by a great majority.

This information was more than offset by North Carolina joining the union. In November, a second convention met under the authority of that state's legislature, and the constitution was approved by a large majority.


CHAPTER VI.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Report of the secretary of the treasury on public credit.... Debate thereon.... Bill for fixing the permanent seat of government.... Adjournment of congress.... Treaty with the Creek Indians.... Relations of the United States with Great Britain and Spain.... The President visits Mount Vernon.... Session of congress.... The President's speech.... Debates on the excise.... On a national bank.... The opinions of the cabinet on the law.... Progress of parties.... War with the Indians.... Defeat of Harmar.... Adjournment of congress.

Meeting of Congress... President's speech... Report from the Secretary of the Treasury on public credit... Debate on that... Bill for establishing the permanent seat of government... Adjournment of Congress... Treaty with the Creek Indians... Relations between the United States and Great Britain and Spain... The President visits Mount Vernon... Session of Congress... The President's speech... Debates on the excise... On a national bank... The cabinet's views on the law... Progress of political parties... War with the Indians... Defeat of Harmar... Adjournment of Congress.

 

1790

On the eighth of January, 1790, the President met both houses of congress in the senate chamber.

On January 8, 1790, the President met with both houses of Congress in the Senate chamber.

Meeting of the second session of the first congress.

In his speech, which was delivered from the chair of the vice president, after congratulating congress on the accession of the important state of North Carolina to the union, and on the prosperous aspect of American affairs, he proceeded to recommend certain great objects of legislation to their more especial consideration.

In his speech from the vice president's chair, after congratulating Congress on North Carolina joining the union and the positive state of American affairs, he went on to suggest some key legislative priorities for their attention.

"Among the many interesting objects," continued the speech, "which will engage your attention, that of providing for the common defence will merit your particular regard. To be prepared for war is one of the most effectual means of preserving peace.

"Among the many interesting topics," the speech continued, "that will catch your attention, the idea of ensuring our common defense deserves your special focus. Being ready for war is one of the most effective ways to maintain peace."

"A free people ought not only to be armed but disciplined; to which end, a uniform and well digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent on others for essential, particularly for military supplies."

"A free people should not only be armed but also trained; to achieve this, a consistent and well-organized plan is necessary. Their safety and interests demand that they support industries that make them self-sufficient, especially for crucial military supplies."

As connected with this subject, a proper establishment for the troops which they might deem indispensable, was suggested for their mature deliberation; and the indications of a hostile temper given by several tribes of Indians, were considered as admonishing them of the necessity of being prepared to afford protection to the frontiers, and to punish aggression.

As related to this topic, a suitable setup for the troops that they might find essential was proposed for their careful consideration; and the signs of a hostile attitude shown by several Indian tribes were taken as a warning about the need to be ready to protect the frontiers and to respond to attacks.

The interests of the United States were declared to require that the means of keeping up their intercourse with foreign nations should be provided; and the expediency of establishing a uniform rule of naturalization was suggested.

The United States' interests were stated to need the means to maintain communication with other countries; and it was suggested that it would be beneficial to create a consistent process for naturalization.

After expressing his confidence in their attention to many improvements essential to the prosperity of the interior, the President added, "nor am I less persuaded that you will agree with me in opinion that there is nothing which can better deserve your patronage than the promotion of science and literature. Knowledge is in every country the surest basis of public happiness. In one, in which the measures of government receive their impression so immediately from the sense of the community as in ours, it is proportionably essential. To the security of a free constitution it contributes in various ways: by convincing those who are intrusted with the public administration, that every valuable end of government is best answered by the enlightened confidence of the people; and by teaching the people themselves to know and to value their own rights; to discern and provide against invasions of them; to distinguish between oppression and the necessary exercise of lawful authority; between burdens proceeding from a disregard to their convenience, and those resulting from the inevitable exigencies of society; to discriminate the spirit of liberty from that of licentiousness, cherishing the first, avoiding the last, and uniting a speedy but temperate vigilance against encroachments, with an inviolable respect to the laws.

After expressing his confidence in your focus on many improvements essential for the prosperity of the interior, the President added, "I am equally convinced that you will agree with me that nothing deserves your support more than the advancement of science and literature. Knowledge is, in every country, the strongest foundation for public happiness. In one where government actions are so directly influenced by public opinion, like ours, it's even more crucial. It contributes to the security of a free constitution in various ways: by showing those in public office that the best way to achieve valuable government goals is through the informed trust of the people; and by teaching the people themselves to understand and appreciate their own rights; to recognize and guard against violations of those rights; to differentiate between oppression and the legitimate exercise of authority; between burdens that come from neglecting their convenience and those that result from the necessary demands of society; to distinguish the spirit of liberty from that of lawlessness, fostering the former, avoiding the latter, and combining a quick yet measured vigilance against violations with unwavering respect for the laws."

"Whether this desirable object will be best promoted by affording aids to seminaries of learning already established, by the institution of a national university, or by any other expedients, will be well worthy of a place in the deliberations of the legislature."

"Whether this valuable goal will be best achieved by providing support to existing educational institutions, by establishing a national university, or by other approaches, should definitely be considered in the discussions of the legislature."

Addressing himself then particularly to the representatives he said: "I saw with peculiar pleasure at the close of the last session, the resolution entered into by you, expressive of your opinion, that an adequate provision for the support of the public credit is a matter of high importance to the national honour and prosperity. In this sentiment I entirely concur; and to a perfect confidence in your best endeavours to devise such a provision as will be truly consistent with the end, I add an equal reliance on the cheerful co-operation of the other branch of the legislature. It would be superfluous to specify inducements to a measure in which the character and permanent interests of the United States are so obviously and so deeply concerned; and which has received so explicit a sanction from your declaration."

Addressing the representatives, he said: "I was particularly pleased to see at the end of the last session that you all agreed it’s crucial for our national honor and prosperity to have a solid plan to support public credit. I completely agree with this view, and I trust in your efforts to come up with a plan that truly meets this goal. I also have full confidence in the enthusiastic cooperation of the other branch of the legislature. It’s unnecessary to outline reasons for a measure that so clearly impacts the character and long-term interests of the United States and which has received such clear approval from your statement."

Addressing himself again to both houses, he observed, that the estimates and papers respecting the objects particularly recommended to their attention would be laid before them; and concluded with saying, "the welfare of our country is the great object to which our cares and efforts ought to be directed: and I shall derive great satisfaction from a co-operation with you in the pleasing though arduous task of insuring to our fellow citizens the blessings which they have a right to expect from a free, efficient, and equal government."

Addressing both houses again, he noted that the estimates and documents related to the specific issues he recommended for their attention would be presented to them. He concluded by stating, "The well-being of our country is the main goal to which we should direct our efforts. I look forward to working with you on the rewarding yet challenging task of ensuring our fellow citizens receive the benefits they deserve from a free, efficient, and fair government."

The answers of both houses were indicative of the harmony which subsisted between the executive and legislative departments.

The responses from both houses showed the cooperation that existed between the executive and legislative branches.

Congress had been so occupied during its first session with those bills which were necessary to bring the new system into full operation, and to create an immediate revenue, that some measures which possessed great and pressing claims to immediate attention had been unavoidably deferred. That neglect under which the creditors of the public had been permitted to languish could not fail to cast an imputation on the American republics, which had been sincerely lamented by the wisest among those who administered the former government. The power to comply substantially with the engagements of the United States being at length conferred on those who were bound by them, it was confidently expected by the friends of the constitution that their country would retrieve its reputation, and that its fame would no longer be tarnished with the blots which stain a faithless people.

Congress had been so busy during its first session with the bills needed to fully implement the new system and generate immediate revenue that some important measures requiring urgent attention had to be put on hold. The negligence that allowed the public creditors to suffer could not help but reflect poorly on the American republics, a fact that was sincerely regretted by the most astute of those who had previously governed. With the authority to fulfill the obligations of the United States finally granted to those responsible for them, supporters of the constitution confidently expected that the nation would restore its reputation and that its reputation would no longer be marred by the stains of a disloyal populace.

Report of the secretary of the treasury of a plan for the support of public credit.

On the 9th of January, a letter from the secretary of the treasury to the speaker of the house of representatives was read, stating that in obedience to the resolution of the 21st of September, he had prepared a plan for the support of public credit, which he was ready to report when the house should be pleased to receive it; and, after a short debate in which the personal attendance of the secretary for the purpose of making explanations was urged by some, and opposed by others, it was resolved that the report should be received in writing on the succeeding Thursday.

On January 9th, a letter from the secretary of the treasury to the speaker of the house of representatives was read. It said that in response to the resolution from September 21st, he had prepared a plan to support public credit, which he was ready to present whenever the house was ready to hear it. After a brief debate, where some argued for the personal presence of the secretary to provide explanations and others opposed it, it was decided that the report would be received in writing the following Thursday.

Availing himself of the latitude afforded by the terms of the resolution under which he acted, the secretary had introduced into his report an able and comprehensive argument elucidating and supporting the principles it contained. After displaying, with strength and perspicuity, the justice and the policy of an adequate provision for the public debt, he proceeded to discuss the principles on which it should be made.

Taking advantage of the flexibility provided by the terms of the resolution he was working under, the secretary included a well-crafted and thorough argument in his report, clarifying and backing up the principles it contained. After clearly and powerfully presenting the fairness and reason behind a solid plan for addressing the public debt, he went on to discuss the principles that should guide its execution.

"It was agreed," he said, "by all, that the foreign debt should be provided for according to the precise terms of the contract. It was to be regretted that, with respect to the domestic debt, the same unanimity of sentiment did not prevail."

"It was agreed," he said, "by everyone that the foreign debt should be settled according to the exact terms of the contract. It's unfortunate that, regarding the domestic debt, the same level of agreement didn’t exist."

The first point on which the public appeared to be divided, involved the question, "whether a discrimination ought not to be made between original holders of the public securities, and present possessors by purchase." After reviewing the arguments generally urged in its support, the secretary declared himself against this discrimination. He deemed it "equally unjust and impolitic; highly injurious even to the original holders of public securities, and ruinous to public credit." To the arguments with which he enforced these opinions, he added the authority of the government of the union. From the circular address of congress to the states, of the 26th of April, 1783, accompanying their revenue system of the 18th of the same month, passages were selected indicating unequivocally, that in the view of that body the original creditors, and those who had become so by assignment, had equal claims upon the nation.

The first point that split public opinion was whether a distinction should be made between the original holders of public securities and those who currently own them through purchase. After considering the commonly presented arguments in favor of this distinction, the secretary stated he was against it. He believed it was "equally unjust and unwise; seriously harmful even to the original holders of public securities, and detrimental to public trust." To back up his views, he cited the authority of the federal government. From the circular sent by Congress to the states on April 26, 1783, which included their revenue system from April 18 of the same month, passages were highlighted that clearly indicated that in the eyes of that body, the original creditors and those who acquired their rights through assignment had equal claims on the nation.

After reasoning at great length against a discrimination between the different creditors of the union, the secretary proceeded to examine whether a difference ought to be permitted to remain between them and the creditors of individual states.

After debating extensively against a distinction among the various creditors of the union, the secretary went on to explore whether a difference should still exist between them and the creditors of individual states.

Both descriptions of debt were contracted for the same objects, and were in the main the same. Indeed, a great part of the particular debts of the states had arisen from assumptions by them on account of the union; and it was most equitable that there should be the same measure of retribution for all. There were many reasons, some of which were stated, for believing this would not be the case, unless the state debts should be assumed by the nation.

Both descriptions of debt were for the same purposes and were essentially the same. In fact, a significant portion of the states' specific debts had come from obligations they took on because of the union; it was only fair that there should be the same standard of repayment for all. There were several reasons, some mentioned, to think this wouldn't happen unless the national government took on the state debts.

In addition to the injustice of favouring one class of creditors more than another which was equally meritorious, many arguments were urged in support of the policy of distributing to all with an equal hand from the same source.

In addition to the unfairness of favoring one group of creditors over another that was equally deserving, many arguments were made in support of the policy of distributing from the same source to everyone equally.

After an elaborate discussion of these and some other points connected with the subject, the secretary proposed that a loan should be opened to the full amount of the debt, as well of the particular states, as of the union.

After a detailed discussion of these and some other related points, the secretary suggested that a loan should be opened for the full amount of the debt, both for the specific states and for the union.

The terms to be offered were,—

The terms being offered were, —

First. That for every one hundred dollars subscribed payable in the debt, as well interest as principal, the subscriber should be entitled to have two-thirds funded on a yearly interest of six per cent, (the capital redeemable at the pleasure of government by the payment of the principal) and to receive the other third in lands of the western territory at their then actual value. Or,

First. For every one hundred dollars invested in the debt, both interest and principal, the investor should be entitled to have two-thirds funded at a yearly interest rate of six percent (the capital can be redeemed at the government’s discretion by repaying the principal) and to receive the remaining third in land from the western territory at its current market value. Or,

Secondly. To have the whole sum funded at a yearly interest of four per cent., irredeemable by any payment exceeding five dollars per annum both on account of principal and interest, and to receive as a compensation for the reduction of interest, fifteen dollars and eighty cents, payable in lands as in the preceding case. Or,

Secondly. To have the entire amount funded at a yearly interest of four percent, which is not redeemable by any payment exceeding five dollars per year for both principal and interest, and to receive as compensation for the reduction of interest, fifteen dollars and eighty cents, payable in land as in the previous case. Or,

Thirdly. To have sixty-six and two-thirds of a dollar funded at a yearly interest of six per cent., irredeemable also by any payment exceeding four dollars and two-thirds of a dollar per annum on account both of principal and interest, and to have at the end of ten years twenty-six dollars and eighty-eight cents funded at the like interest and rate of redemption.

Thirdly. To have $66.67 invested at a yearly interest rate of 6%, which can't be redeemed with any payment over $4.67 per year for both principal and interest, and to end up with $26.88 funded at the same interest and redemption terms after ten years.

In addition to these propositions the creditors were to have an option of vesting their money in annuities on different plans; and it was also recommended to open a loan at five per cent, for ten millions of dollars, payable one half in specie, and the other half in the debt, irredeemable by any payment exceeding six dollars per annum both of principal and interest.

In addition to these proposals, the creditors would have the option to invest their money in annuities under various plans. It was also suggested to offer a loan at five percent for ten million dollars, with half payable in cash and the other half in debt, which could not be redeemed by any payment exceeding six dollars per year for both principal and interest.

By way of experiment, a tontine on principles stated in the report was also suggested.

By way of experimentation, a tontine based on the principles outlined in the report was also proposed.

The secretary was restrained from proposing to fund the whole debt immediately at the current rate of interest, by the opinion, "that although such a provision might not exceed the abilities of the country, it would require the extension of taxation to a degree, and to objects which the true interest of the creditors themselves would forbid. It was therefore to be hoped and expected, that they would cheerfully concur in such modifications of their claims, on fair and equitable principles, as would facilitate to the government an arrangement substantial, durable, and satisfactory to the community. Exigencies might ere long arise which would call for resources greatly beyond what was now deemed sufficient for the current service; and should the faculties of the country be exhausted, or even strained to provide for the public debt, there could be less reliance on the sacredness of the provision.

The secretary held back from suggesting that the entire debt be funded right away at the current interest rate, because it was felt that, "even though such a measure might be within the country’s capabilities, it would require extending taxes to a level and for purposes that would go against the true interests of the creditors themselves. It was therefore hoped and expected that they would willingly agree to some adjustments of their claims, based on fair and reasonable principles, that would help the government reach a solution that was substantial, lasting, and satisfactory to the community. There might soon be urgent needs that would require resources far beyond what is currently considered enough for ongoing expenses; and if the country's resources were exhausted, or even stretched thin to meet the public debt, there would be less confidence in the reliability of the arrangement."

"But while he yielded to the force of these considerations, he did not lose sight of those fundamental principles of good faith which dictate that every practicable exertion ought to be made, scrupulously to fulfil the engagements of government; that no change in the rights of its creditors ought to be attempted without their voluntary consent; and that this consent ought to be voluntary in fact, as well as in name. Consequently, that every proposal of a change ought to be in the shape of an appeal to their reason and to their interest, not to their necessities. To this end it was requisite that a fair equivalent should be offered, for what might be asked to be given up, and unquestionable security for the remainder." This fair equivalent for the proposed reduction of interest was, he thought, offered in the relinquishment of the power to redeem the whole debt at pleasure.

"But while he acknowledged the weight of these considerations, he did not overlook the fundamental principles of good faith, which dictate that every reasonable effort should be made to fully meet the government’s obligations; that no change to the rights of its creditors should be pursued without their voluntary consent; and that this consent must be genuinely voluntary, not just in name. Therefore, any proposal for a change should be presented as an appeal to their reason and interests, rather than their needs. To achieve this, it was necessary to offer a fair equivalent for what might be asked to be given up, along with undeniable security for what would remain." He believed that this fair equivalent for the proposed reduction of interest was offered through the relinquishment of the power to redeem the entire debt at will.

That a free judgment might be exercised by the holders of public securities in accepting or rejecting the terms offered by the government, provision was made in the report for paying to non-subscribing creditors, a dividend of the surplus which should remain in the treasury after paying the interest of the proposed loans: but as the funds immediately to be provided, were calculated to produce only four per cent, on the entire debt, the dividend, for the present, was not to exceed that rate of interest.

That public security holders could make an independent choice in accepting or rejecting the government’s terms, the report included a plan to pay a dividend from the surplus left in the treasury after covering the interest on the proposed loans to creditors who did not subscribe. However, since the funds to be provided were expected to yield only four percent on the total debt, the dividend would not exceed that interest rate for the time being.

To enable the treasury to support this increased demand upon it, an augmentation of the duties on imported wines, spirits, tea, and coffee, was proposed, and a duty on home made spirits was also recommended.

To help the treasury handle this increased demand, it was suggested to raise the taxes on imported wines, spirits, tea, and coffee, and a tax on homemade spirits was also recommended.

This celebrated report, which has been alike the fruitful theme of extravagant praise and bitter censure, merits the more attention, because the first regular and systematic opposition to the principles on which the affairs of the union were administered, originated in the measures which were founded on it.

This famous report, which has received both extravagant praise and harsh criticism, deserves more attention because it sparked the first organized and systematic opposition to the principles governing the administration of the union's affairs.

On the 28th of January, this subject was taken up; and, after some animadversions on the speculations in the public debt to which the report, it was said, had already given birth, the business was postponed until the eighth of February, when it was again brought forward.

On January 28th, this topic was discussed; and after some comments on the developments regarding the public debt that the report was said to have already sparked, the matter was postponed until February 8th, when it was brought up again.

Debate thereon.

Several resolutions affirmative of the principles contained in the report, were moved by Mr. Fitzsimmons. To the first, which respected a provision for the foreign debt, the house agreed without a dissenting voice. The second, in favour of appropriating permanent funds for payment of the interest on the domestic debt, and for the gradual redemption of the principal, gave rise to a very animated debate.

Several resolutions supporting the principles in the report were proposed by Mr. Fitzsimmons. The first resolution, which addressed a provision for the foreign debt, was agreed to by the house without any dissent. The second resolution, advocating for permanent funds to pay the interest on the domestic debt and gradually redeem the principal, sparked a lively debate.

Mr. Jackson declared his hostility to funding systems generally. To prove their pernicious influence, he appealed to the histories of Florence, Genoa, and Great Britain; and, contending that the subject ought to be deferred until North Carolina should be represented, moved, that the committee should rise. This question being decided in the negative, Mr. Scott declared the opinion that the United States were not bound to pay the domestic creditors the sums specified in the certificates of debts in their possession. He supported this opinion by urging, not that the public had received less value than was expressed on the face of the paper which had been issued, but that those to whom it had been delivered, by parting with it at two shillings and sixpence in the pound, had themselves fixed the value of their claims, and had manifested their willingness to add to their other sacrifices this deduction from their demand upon the nation. He therefore moved to amend the resolution before the committee so as to require a resettlement of the debt.

Mr. Jackson expressed his opposition to funding systems in general. To illustrate their harmful impact, he referenced the histories of Florence, Genoa, and Great Britain; and argued that the discussion should be postponed until North Carolina had representation, proposing that the committee adjourn. When this proposal was rejected, Mr. Scott stated his belief that the United States was not obligated to pay domestic creditors the amounts listed on the debt certificates they held. He backed this view by arguing that it wasn't that the public received less value than what was indicated on the issued paper, but rather that those who received it had effectively determined the value of their claims by selling it for two shillings and sixpence on the pound, demonstrating their readiness to accept this deduction from what they demanded from the nation. He subsequently moved to modify the resolution before the committee to require a reassessment of the debt.

The amendment was opposed by Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Ames, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Hartley, and Mr. Goodhue. They stated at large the terms on which the debt had been contracted, and urged the confidence which the creditors had a right to place in the government for its discharge according to settlements already made, and acknowledgments already given. The idea that the legislative body could diminish an ascertained debt was reprobated with great force, as being at the same time unjust, impolitic, and subversive of every principle on which public contracts are founded. The evidences of debt possessed by the creditors of the United States were considered as public bonds, for the redemption of which the property and the labour of the people were pledged.

The amendment was opposed by Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Ames, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Hartley, and Mr. Goodhue. They explained in detail the terms on which the debt was incurred and emphasized the confidence that creditors had the right to place in the government for its repayment based on previous agreements and acknowledgments. The notion that the legislative body could reduce a recognized debt was strongly condemned as not only unjust and impractical but also destructive to the principles on which public contracts are based. The debts held by the creditors of the United States were viewed as public bonds, for which the property and labor of the people were pledged for repayment.

After the debate had been protracted to some length, the question was taken on Mr. Scott's amendment, and it passed in the negative.

After the debate went on for a while, they voted on Mr. Scott's amendment, and it was rejected.

Mr. Madison then rose, and, in an eloquent speech, replete with argument, proposed an amendment to the resolution, the effect of which was to discriminate between the public creditors, so as to pay the present holder of assignable paper the highest price it had borne in the market, and give the residue to the person with whom the debt was originally contracted. Where the original creditor had never parted with his claim, he was to receive the whole sum acknowledged to be due on the face of the certificate.

Mr. Madison then stood up and, in a powerful speech filled with strong arguments, suggested an amendment to the resolution. This amendment aimed to differentiate between public creditors, ensuring that the current holder of assignable paper would receive the highest price it had reached in the market, while the remaining amount would go to the person with whom the debt was originally made. If the original creditor had never given up their claim, they would receive the entire amount acknowledged as due on the face of the certificate.

This motion was supported by Mr. Jackson, Mr. White, Mr. Moore, Mr. Page, Mr. Stone, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Seney.

This motion was backed by Mr. Jackson, Mr. White, Mr. Moore, Mr. Page, Mr. Stone, Mr. Scott, and Mr. Seney.

It was opposed with great earnestness and strength of argument, by Mr. Sedgewick, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Smith, of South Carolina, Mr. Ames, Mr. Gerry, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Wadsworth, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Hartley, Mr. Bland, Mr. Benson, Mr. Burke, and Mr. Livermore.

It was strongly opposed with serious arguments by Mr. Sedgewick, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Smith from South Carolina, Mr. Ames, Mr. Gerry, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Wadsworth, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Hartley, Mr. Bland, Mr. Benson, Mr. Burke, and Mr. Livermore.

The argument was ably supported on both sides, was long, animated, and interesting. At length the question was put, and the amendment was rejected by a great majority.

The debate was well-supported on both sides, lengthy, lively, and engaging. Eventually, the question was raised, and the amendment was rejected by a large majority.

This discussion deeply engaged the public attention. The proposition was new and interesting. That the debt ought to be diminished for the public advantage, was an opinion which had frequently been advanced, and was maintained by many. But a reduction from the claims of its present holders for the benefit of those who had sold their rights, was a measure which saved nothing to the public purse, and was therefore recommended only by considerations, the operation of which can never be very extensive. Against it were arranged all who had made purchases, and a great majority of those who conceived that sound policy and honest dealing require a literal observance of public contracts.

This discussion really captured the public's attention. The proposal was fresh and intriguing. The idea that the debt should be reduced for the public good was a view that had often been expressed and was supported by many. However, reducing the claims of current holders for the benefit of those who had sold their rights wouldn’t save the public money and was therefore only supported by arguments that could never have a wide impact. Opposing it were all those who had made purchases, along with most people who believed that good policy and fair dealing necessitate sticking strictly to public contracts.

Although the decision of congress against a discrimination in favour of the original creditor produced no considerable sensation, the determination on that part of the secretary's report which was the succeeding subject of deliberation, affecting political interests and powers which are never to be approached without danger, seemed to unchain all those fierce passions which a high respect for the government and for those who administered it, had in a great measure restrained.

Although Congress's decision against discrimination in favor of the original creditor didn’t create much of a stir, the part of the secretary's report that was discussed next, which impacted political interests and powers that are always risky to touch, seemed to unleash all those intense emotions that a deep respect for the government and its officials had largely kept in check.

The manner in which the several states entered into and conducted the war of the revolution, will be recollected. Acting in some respects separately, and in others conjointly, for the attainment of a common object, their resources were exerted, sometimes under the authority of congress, sometimes under the authority of the local government, to repel the enemy wherever he appeared. The debt incurred in support of the war was therefore, in the first instance, contracted partly by the continent, and partly by the states. When the system of requisitions was adopted, the transactions of the union were carried on, almost entirely, through the agency of the states; and when the measure of compensating the army for the depreciation of their pay became necessary, this burden, under the recommendation of congress, was assumed by the respective states. Some had funded this debt, and paid the interest upon it. Others had made no provision for the interest; but all, by taxes, paper money, or purchase, had, in some measure, reduced the principal. In their exertions some degree of inequality had obtained; and they looked anxiously to a settlement of accounts, for the ascertainment of claims which each supposed itself to have upon the union. Measures to effect this object had been taken by the former government; but they were slow in their progress, and intrinsic difficulties were found in the thing itself, not easily to be overcome.

The way the different states got involved in and managed the Revolutionary War will be remembered. They acted both separately and together to achieve a shared goal, using their resources sometimes under Congress's authority and other times under local government authority to fend off the enemy wherever he struck. The debt created to support the war was initially incurred partly by the continent as a whole and partly by the individual states. When the system of requisitions was put in place, most of the Union's transactions were handled through the states. When it became necessary to compensate the army for the loss of value in their pay, this burden was taken on by the individual states, following Congress's recommendation. Some states funded this debt and paid the interest on it, while others made no provisions for interest; however, all states had, in various ways—through taxes, paper money, or direct purchases—reduced the principal amount. In their efforts, a certain degree of inequality emerged, and they looked forward to settling accounts to determine the claims each believed they had against the Union. The previous government had initiated measures to achieve this, but progress was slow, and there were intrinsic difficulties that were not easily overcome.

The secretary of the treasury proposed to assume these debts, and to fund them in common with that which continued to be the proper debt of the union.

The treasury secretary suggested taking over these debts and combining them with what was still considered the official debt of the union.

The resolution which comprehended this principle of the report, was vigorously opposed.

The resolution that included this principle of the report was strongly opposed.

It was contended that the general government would acquire an undue influence, and that the state governments would be annihilated by the measure. Not only would all the influence of the public creditors be thrown into the scale of the former, but it would absorb all the powers of taxation, and leave to the latter only the shadow of a government. This would probably terminate in rendering the state governments useless, and would destroy the system so recently established. The union, it was said, had been compared to a rope of sand; but gentlemen were cautioned not to push things to the opposite extreme. The attempt to strengthen it might be unsuccessful, and the cord might be strained until it should break.

It was argued that the federal government would gain excessive power, and that state governments would effectively be eliminated by this measure. Not only would the interests of public creditors be aligned with the federal government, but it would also take on all taxation powers, leaving state governments with little more than a facade of authority. This would likely render state governments pointless and undermine the system that had just been established. The union, it was noted, had been likened to a rope of sand; however, people were warned not to go to the other extreme. Trying to strengthen it might fail, and the tension could cause it to snap.

The constitutional authority of the federal government to assume the debts of the states was questioned. Its powers, it was said, were specified, and this was not among them.

The constitutional authority of the federal government to take on the debts of the states was challenged. It was argued that its powers were clearly defined, and this wasn’t included among them.

The policy of the measure, as it affected merely the government of the union, was controverted, and its justice was arraigned.

The policy of the measure, since it only impacted the government of the union, was debated, and its fairness was questioned.

On the ground of policy it was objected, that the assumption would impose on the United States a burden, the weight of which was unascertained, and which would require an extension of taxation beyond the limits which prudence would prescribe. An attempt to raise the impost would be dangerous; and the excise added to it would not produce funds adequate to the object. A tax on real estate must be resorted to, objections to which had been made in every part of the union. It would be more adviseable to leave this source of revenue untouched in the hands of the state governments, who could apply to it with more facility, with a better understanding of the subject, and with less dissatisfaction to individuals, than could possibly be done by the government of the United States.

On policy grounds, it was argued that the assumption would place an unknown burden on the United States, requiring tax increases that would exceed what was reasonable. Trying to raise the import tax could be risky, and adding an excise tax wouldn't generate enough funds for the purpose. A property tax would have to be implemented, but there had been objections to that everywhere in the union. It would be wiser to keep this source of revenue in the hands of state governments, who could handle it more easily, understand the issue better, and create less dissatisfaction among individuals than the federal government could manage.

There existed no necessity for taking up this burden. The state creditors had not required it. There was no petition from them upon the subject. There was not only no application from the states, but there was reason to believe that they were seriously opposed to the measure. Many of them would certainly view it with a jealous,—a jaundiced eye. The convention of North Carolina, which adopted the constitution, had proposed, as an amendment to it, to deprive congress of the power of interfering between the respective states and their creditors: and there could be no obligation to assume more than the balances which on a final settlement would be found due to creditor states.

There was no need to take on this burden. The state creditors hadn’t asked for it. They hadn’t submitted any requests about it. Not only was there no application from the states, but it seemed likely that they were strongly against the idea. Many would definitely view it with suspicion and resentment. The convention of North Carolina, which approved the constitution, had proposed an amendment to prevent Congress from interfering between the states and their creditors. There was no obligation to assume more than what would be determined as owed to creditor states after a final settlement.

That the debt by being thus accumulated would be perpetuated was also an evil of real magnitude. Many of the states had already made considerable progress in extinguishing their debts, and the process might certainly be carried on more rapidly by them than by the union. A public debt seemed to be considered by some as a public blessing; but to this doctrine they were not converts. If, as they believed, a public debt was a public evil, it would be enormously increased by adding those of the states to that of the union.

The fact that the debt would keep growing was also a significant problem. Many states had already made good progress in paying off their debts, and they could definitely do it faster than the federal government. Some people saw public debt as a positive thing; however, they didn’t share that belief. If they truly thought public debt was a bad thing, then combining the states' debts with the federal debt would make the situation way worse.

The measure was unwise too as it would affect public credit. Such an augmentation of the debt must inevitably depreciate its value; since it was the character of paper, whatever denomination it might assume, to diminish in value in proportion to the quantity in circulation.

The decision was unwise too, as it would impact public credit. Increasing the debt would inevitably decrease its value, since paper money, no matter what denomination it has, tends to lose value in relation to the amount in circulation.

It would also increase an evil which was already sensibly felt. The state debts when assumed by the continent, would, as that of the union had already done, accumulate in large cities; and the dissatisfaction excited by the payment of taxes, would be increased by perceiving that the money raised from the people flowed into the hands of a few individuals. Still greater mischief was to be apprehended. A great part of this additional debt would go into the hands of foreigners; and the United States would be heavily burdened to pay an interest which could not be expected to remain in the country.

It would also increase a problem that was already clearly felt. When the state debts were taken on by the continent, it would, just like the union's debt had already done, concentrate in large cities; and the discontent caused by tax payments would grow as people saw their money going into the hands of a few individuals. An even bigger issue was to be feared. A significant portion of this extra debt would end up in the hands of foreigners; and the United States would be heavily burdened to pay interest that was unlikely to stay in the country.

The measure was unjust, because it was burdening those states which had taxed themselves highly to discharge the claims of their creditors, with the debts of those which had not made the same exertions. It would delay the settlement of accounts between the individual states and the United States; and the supporters of the measure were openly charged with intending to defeat that settlement.

The measure was unfair because it placed a burden on those states that had heavily taxed themselves to pay off their creditors, while also dealing with the debts of those that hadn't put in the same effort. It would postpone the resolution of accounts between the individual states and the United States; and the supporters of the measure were openly accused of trying to sabotage that resolution.

It was also said that, in its execution, the scheme would be found extremely embarrassing, perhaps impracticable. The case of a partial accession to the measure by the creditors, a case which would probably occur, presented a difficulty for which no provision was made, and of which no solution had been given. Should the creditors in some states come into the system, and those in others refuse to change their security, the government would be involved in perplexities from which no means of extricating itself had been shown. Nor would it be practicable to discriminate between the debts contracted for general and for local objects.

It was also noted that, in its execution, the plan would likely be very embarrassing, possibly impractical. The situation where some creditors partially agreed to the measure—a scenario that would probably happen—posed a challenge that hadn’t been addressed, and no solution had been proposed. If creditors in some states opted into the system while those in others refused to alter their security, the government would find itself in a complicated situation with no clear way to get out. It also wouldn't be feasible to differentiate between debts incurred for general versus local purposes.

In the course of the debate, severe allusions were made to the conduct of particular states; and the opinions advanced in favour of the measure, were ascribed to local interests.

During the debate, strong references were made to the actions of certain states; and the opinions expressed in support of the measure were attributed to local interests.

In support of the assumption, the debts of the states were traced to their origin. America, it was said, had engaged in a war, the object of which was equally interesting to every part of the union. It was not the war of a particular state, but of the United States. It was not the liberty and independence of a part, but of the whole, for which they had contended, and which they had acquired. The cause was a common cause. As brethren, the American people had consented to hazard property and life in its defence. All the sums expended in the attainment of this great object, whatever might be the authority under which they were raised or appropriated, conduced to the same end. Troops were raised, and military stores purchased, before congress assumed the command of the army, or the control of the war. The ammunition which repulsed the enemy at Bunker's Hill, was purchased by Massachusetts; and formed a part of the debt of that state.

To support this assumption, the states' debts were traced back to their origins. It was said that America had entered a war that was equally significant to every part of the union. This was not the war of one state, but of the United States as a whole. It was not just the liberty and independence of one part, but of everyone, that they fought for and achieved. The cause was a shared cause. Together, the American people agreed to risk their property and lives to defend it. All the money spent to achieve this important goal, regardless of the authority under which it was raised or used, contributed to the same purpose. Troops were recruited and military supplies were bought before Congress took charge of the army or the war. The ammunition that drove the enemy back at Bunker’s Hill was purchased by Massachusetts and was part of that state’s debt.

Nothing could be more erroneous than the principle which had been assumed in argument, that the holders of securities issued by individual states were to be considered merely as state creditors;—as if the debt had been contracted on account of the particular state. It was contracted on account of the union, in that common cause in which all were equally interested.

Nothing could be more wrong than the idea that was argued, that people who hold securities issued by individual states should be seen simply as state creditors—as if the debt was taken on for the specific state. It was incurred on behalf of the union, in that shared cause in which everyone had an equal stake.

From the complex nature of the political system which had been adopted in America, the war was, in a great measure, carried on through the agency of the state governments; and the debts were, in truth, the debts of the union, for which the states had made themselves responsible. Except the civil list, the whole state expenditure was in the prosecution of the war; and the state taxes had undeniably exceeded the provision for their civil list. The foundation for the several classes of the debt was reviewed in detail; and it was affirmed to be proved from the review, and from the books in the public offices, that, in its origin, a great part of it, even in form, and the whole, in fact, was equitably due from the continent. The states individually possessing all the resources of the nation, became responsible to certain descriptions of the public creditors. But they were the agents of the continent in contracting the debt; and its distribution among them for payment, arose from the division of political power which existed under the old confederation. A new arrangement of the system had taken place, and a power over the resources of the nation was conferred on the general government. With the funds, the debt also ought to be assumed. This investigation of its origin demonstrated that the assumption was not the creation of a new debt, but the reacknowledgment of liability for an old one, the payment of which had devolved on those members of the system, who, at the time, were alone capable of paying it. And thence was inferred, not only the justice of the measure, but a complete refutation of the arguments drawn from the constitution. If, in point of fact, the debt was in its origin continental, and had been transferred to the states for greater facility of payment, there could be no constitutional objection to restoring its original and real character.

From the complicated nature of the political system established in America, the war was largely carried out through the state governments; and the debts were essentially the debts of the union, for which the states had taken responsibility. Except for the civil list, all state spending was focused on the war effort, and state taxes had clearly exceeded what was allocated for their civil list. The foundations of the different classes of debt were examined in detail, and it was confirmed from the review and from the records in the public offices that, in its origins, a significant part of it, even in form, and the whole, in reality, was fairly owed by the continent. The states, each holding the nation's resources, became accountable to specific types of public creditors. However, they were the agents of the continent in incurring the debt; its allocation for payment among them stemmed from the division of political power that existed under the old confederation. A new system had been established, and power over the nation’s resources was given to the federal government. With the funds, the debt should also be assumed. This examination of its origins showed that the assumption was not the creation of new debt, but a reacknowledgment of responsibility for an old one, the payment of which had fallen on those members of the system who were capable of paying it at the time. From this, not only the fairness of the measure was inferred but also a complete refutation of the arguments based on the constitution. If, in reality, the debt was originally continental and had been transferred to the states for easier payment, there could be no constitutional objection to restoring its original and true nature.

The great powers of war, of taxation, and of borrowing money, which were vested in congress to pay the debts, and provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States, comprised that in question. There could be no more doubt of their right to charge themselves with the payment of a debt contracted in the past war, than to borrow money for the prosecution of a future war. The impolicy of leaving the public creditors to receive payment from different sources was also strongly pressed; and the jealousy which would exist between the creditors of the union and of the states, was considered as a powerful argument in favour of giving them one common interest. This jealousy, it was feared, might be carried so far, as even to create an opposition to the laws of the union.

The major powers of war, taxation, and borrowing money, which were granted to Congress to pay off debts and ensure the common defense and general welfare of the United States, included those in question. There was no doubt about their right to take on the payment of a debt incurred during the past war, just as they could borrow money for a future war. It was strongly argued that it would be unwise to have public creditors seeking payment from various sources, and the potential jealousy between the creditors of the union and those of the states was seen as a significant reason to unify their interests. This jealousy, it was feared, could escalate to the point of opposing the laws of the union.

If the states should provide for their creditors, the same sum of money must be collected from the people, as would be required if the debt should be assumed; and it would probably be collected in a manner more burdensome, than if one uniform system should be established. If all should not make such provision, it would be unjust to leave the soldier of one state unpaid, while the services of the man who fought by his side were amply compensated; and, after having assumed the funds, it would dishonour the general government to permit a creditor for services rendered, or property advanced for the continent, to remain unsatisfied, because his claim had been transferred to the state, at a time when the state alone possessed the means of payment. By the injured and neglected creditor, such an arrangement might justly be considered as a disreputable artifice.

If the states are going to pay their creditors, they will need to collect the same amount of money from the people that they would if the debt were assumed, and it will probably be collected in a more burdensome way than if there were a single, uniform system in place. If not everyone makes this provision, it would be unfair to leave one state's soldier unpaid while the soldier who fought alongside him is fully compensated. After taking on the funds, it would be dishonorable for the federal government to let a creditor for services provided, or property given for the benefit of the country, remain unpaid just because his claim was transferred to the state when only the state had the means to pay. This type of arrangement might justifiably be seen as a shady tactic by the wronged and overlooked creditor.

Instead of delaying, it was believed to be a measure which would facilitate the settlement of accounts between the states. Its advocates declared that they did not entertain, and never had entertained any wish to procrastinate a settlement. On the contrary, it was greatly desired by them. They had themselves brought forward propositions for that purpose; and they invited their adversaries to assist in improving the plan which had been introduced.

Instead of putting it off, it was thought to be a step that would help settle the accounts between the states. Those in favor said they had no desire, and never had, to delay a resolution. On the contrary, they were very eager for it. They had even proposed ideas for that goal and invited their opponents to help enhance the plan that had been suggested.

The settlement between the states, it was said, either would or would not be made. Should it ever take place, it would remedy any inequalities which might grow out of the assumption. Should it never take place, the justice of the measure became the more apparent. That the burdens in support of a common war, which from various causes had devolved unequally on the states, ought to be apportioned among them, was a truth too clear to be controverted; and this, if the settlement should never be accomplished, could be effected only by the measure now proposed. Indeed, in any event, it would be the only certain, as well as only eligible plan. For how were the debtor states to be compelled to pay the balances which should be found against them?

The settlement between the states was said to either happen or not. If it ever took place, it would fix any inequalities that might arise from the assumption. If it never happened, the fairness of the measure became even more obvious. The fact that the burdens of supporting a shared war, which for various reasons had fallen unevenly on the states, should be divided among them was a truth too clear to dispute; and this, if the settlement was never achieved, could only be done by the proposed measure. In any case, it would be the only certain and suitable plan. After all, how could the debtor states be forced to pay the balances that were found against them?

If the measure was recommended by considerations which rendered its ultimate adoption inevitable, the present was clearly preferable to any future time. It was desirable immediately to quiet the minds of the public creditors by assuring them that justice would be done; to simplify the forms of public debt; and to put an end to that speculation which had been so much reprobated, and which could be terminated only by giving the debt a real and permanent value.

If the decision was suggested by reasons that made its eventual acceptance unavoidable, then now was definitely better than any future moment. It was important to immediately calm the concerns of public creditors by ensuring them that justice would be served; to streamline the processes of public debt; and to put a stop to the speculation that had been heavily criticized, which could only be resolved by giving the debt a genuine and lasting value.

That the assumption would impair the just influence of the states was controverted with great strength of argument. The diffusive representation in the state legislatures, the intimate connexion between the representative and his constituents, the influence of the state legislatures over the members of one branch of the national legislature, the nature of the powers exercised by the state governments which perpetually presented them to the people in a point of view calculated to lay hold of the public affections, were guarantees that the states would retain their due weight in the political system, and that a debt was not necessary to the solidity or duration of their power.

The idea that this assumption would weaken the rightful influence of the states was countered with strong arguments. The broad representation in state legislatures, the close relationship between representatives and their constituents, the impact of state legislatures on the members of one branch of the national legislature, and the nature of the powers held by state governments which consistently kept them connected to the people's interests, all served as assurances that the states would maintain their proper importance in the political system, and that a debt was not needed to ensure their strength or longevity.

But the argument it was said proved too much. If a debt was now essential to the preservation of state authority, it would always be so. It must therefore never be extinguished, but must be perpetuated, in order to secure the existence of the state governments. If, for this purpose, it was indispensable that the expenses of the revolutionary war should be borne by the states, it would not be less indispensable that the expenses of future wars should be borne in the same manner. Either the argument was unfounded, or the constitution was wrong; and the powers of the sword and the purse ought not to have been conferred on the government of the union. Whatever speculative opinions might be entertained on this point, they were to administer the government according to the principles of the constitution as it was framed. But, it was added, if so much power follows the assumption as the objection implies, is it not time to ask—is it safe to forbear assuming? if the power is so dangerous, it will be so when exercised by the states. If assuming tends to consolidation, is the reverse, tending to disunion, a less weighty objection? if it is answered that the non-assumption will not necessarily tend to disunion; neither, it may be replied, does the assumption necessarily tend to consolidation.

But the argument, it was said, proved to be too much. If a debt is essential to maintaining state authority now, it’ll always be that way. Therefore, it should never be paid off but should be kept going to ensure the survival of state governments. If it’s absolutely necessary for the states to cover the costs of the revolutionary war, it’s equally necessary for them to cover the costs of future wars in the same way. Either the argument is flawed, or the constitution is wrong; the powers of war and finances should not have been given to the federal government. Regardless of any theories about this matter, they have to run the government according to the principles of the constitution as it was written. But it was also pointed out that if so much power comes from this assumption as the objection suggests, isn’t it time to ask— is it safe to avoid making an assumption? If that power is so risky, it will still be risky when held by the states. If assuming leads to centralization, isn’t the opposite, which leads to disunity, a serious concern? If the reply is that not making assumptions won’t necessarily lead to disunity, then it can also be said that making assumptions doesn’t necessarily lead to centralization.

It was not admitted that the assumption would tend to perpetuate the debt. It could not be presumed that the general government would be less willing than the local governments to discharge it; nor could it be presumed that the means were less attainable by the former than the latter.

It wasn't acknowledged that this assumption would likely keep the debt ongoing. It couldn't be assumed that the federal government would be any less willing than local governments to pay it off; nor could it be assumed that the resources were less accessible to the former than to the latter.

It was not contended that a public debt was a public blessing. Whether a debt was to be preferred to no debt was not the question. The debt was already contracted: and the question, so far as policy might be consulted, was, whether it was more for the public advantage to give it such a form as would render it applicable to the purposes of a circulating medium, or to leave it a mere subject of speculation, incapable of being employed to any useful purpose. The debt was admitted to be an evil; but it was an evil from which, if wisely modified, some benefit might be extracted; and which, in its present state, could have only a mischievous operation.

It wasn't argued that public debt was a public blessing. The question wasn't whether having a debt was better than having none at all. The debt was already in place: and the real question, considering policy, was whether it would be more beneficial for the public to convert it into a form that could be used as a circulating medium, or to leave it as just a topic for speculation, unable to serve any useful purpose. The debt was recognized as a problem; however, if handled wisely, it could be turned into some advantage, whereas in its current form, it could only cause harm.

If the debt should be placed on adequate funds, its operation on public credit could not be pernicious: in its present precarious condition, there was much more to be apprehended in that respect.

If the debt were backed by sufficient funds, it wouldn't negatively impact public credit; in its current unstable state, there was a lot more to be worried about in that regard.

To the objection that it would accumulate in large cities, it was answered it would be a monied capital, and would be held by those who chose to place money at interest; but by funding the debt, the present possessors would be enabled to part with it at its nominal value, instead of selling it at its present current rate. If it should centre in the hands of foreigners, the sooner it was appreciated to its proper standard, the greater quantity of specie would its transfer bring into the United States.

To the concern that it would gather in big cities, it was responded that it would be a financial capital, held by those who decided to invest their money; but by funding the debt, the current holders would be able to sell it at its face value, instead of at the lower market rate. If it were to end up in the hands of foreigners, the quicker it was valued correctly, the more gold and silver would come into the United States through its transfer.

To the injustice of charging those states which had made great exertions for the payment of their debts with the burden properly belonging to those which had not made such exertions, it was answered, that every state must be considered as having exerted itself to the utmost of its resources; and that if it could not, or would not make provision for creditors to whom the union was equitably bound, the argument in favour of an assumption was the stronger.

To the unfairness of holding those states that worked hard to pay their debts responsible for the obligations of those that didn’t, it was argued that every state should be seen as having done everything possible with its resources. If a state couldn’t or wouldn’t make provisions for creditors that the union was fairly obligated to pay, then the case for an assumption was even stronger.

The arguments drawn from local interests were repelled, and retorted, and a great degree of irritation was excited on both sides.

The arguments based on local interests were dismissed and countered, leading to a significant amount of irritation on both sides.

After a very animated discussion of several days, the question was taken, and the resolution was carried by a small majority. Soon after this decision, while the subject was pending before the house, the delegates from North Carolina took their seats, and changed the strength of parties. By a majority of two voices, the resolution was recommitted; and, after a long and ardent debate, was negatived by the same majority.

After an intense discussion that lasted several days, the question was brought to a vote, and the resolution passed by a slim majority. Shortly after this decision, while the topic was still being discussed in the house, the delegates from North Carolina arrived and shifted the balance of power. With a majority of just two votes, the resolution was sent back for reconsideration, and after a lengthy and passionate debate, it was rejected by the same majority.

This proposition continued to be supported with a degree of earnestness which its opponents termed pertinacious, but not a single opinion was changed. It was brought forward in the new and less exceptionable form of assuming specific sums from each state. Under this modification of the principle, the extraordinary contributions of particular states during the war, and their exertions since the peace, might be regarded; and the objections to the measure, drawn from the uncertainty of the sum to be assumed, would be removed. But these alterations produced no change of sentiment; and the bill was sent up to the senate with a provision for those creditors only whose certificates of debt purported to be payable by the union.

This proposal continued to be backed with a level of intensity that its opponents called stubborn, but not a single opinion shifted. It was presented in a new and less controversial way by suggesting specific amounts from each state. With this change, the exceptional contributions of certain states during the war and their efforts since the peace could be taken into account, and the concerns about the uncertainty of the amount to be assumed would be addressed. However, these changes did not alter anyone’s opinion; the bill was sent to the Senate with a provision for those creditors whose debt certificates claimed to be payable by the union.

In this state of things, the measure is understood to have derived aid from another, which was of a nature strongly to interest particular parts of the union.

In this situation, the measure is believed to have received support from another one that was particularly appealing to specific regions of the union.

From the month of June, 1783, when congress was driven from Philadelphia by the mutiny of a part of the Pennsylvania line, the necessity of selecting some place for a permanent residence, in which the government of the union might exercise sufficient authority to protect itself from violence and insult, had been generally acknowledged. Scarcely any subject had occupied more time, or had more agitated the members of the former congress than this.

From June 1783, when Congress was forced out of Philadelphia by a mutiny among some of the Pennsylvania troops, it became clear that a permanent location needed to be chosen where the government of the union could maintain enough authority to protect itself from violence and disrespect. Few topics had taken up more time or stirred up more debate among the members of the previous Congress than this one.

Bill for fixing the permanent seat of government.

In December, 1784, an ordinance was passed for appointing commissioners to purchase land on the Delaware, in the neighbourhood of its falls, and to erect thereon the necessary public buildings for the reception of congress, and the officers of government; but the southern interest had been sufficiently strong to arrest the execution of this ordinance by preventing an appropriation of funds, which required the assent of nine states. Under the existing government, this subject had received the early attention of congress; and many different situations from the Delaware to the Potomac inclusive, had been earnestly supported; but a majority of both houses had not concurred in favour of any one place. With as little success, attempts had been made to change the temporary residence of congress. Although New York was obviously too far to the east, so many conflicting interests were brought into operation whenever the subject was touched, that no motion designating a more central place, could succeed. At length, a compact respecting the temporary and permanent seat of government was entered into between the friends of Philadelphia, and the Potomac, stipulating that congress should adjourn to and hold its sessions in Philadelphia, for ten years, during which time, buildings for the accommodation of the government should be erected at some place on the Potomac, to which the government should remove at the expiration of the term. This compact having united the representatives of Pennsylvania and Delaware with the friends of the Potomac, in favour both of the temporary and permanent residence which had been agreed on between them, a majority was produced in favour of the two situations, and a bill which was brought into the senate in conformity with this previous arrangement, passed both houses by small majorities. This act was immediately followed by an amendment to the bill then pending before the senate for funding the debt of the union. The amendment was similar in principle to that which had been unsuccessfully proposed in the house of representatives. By its provisions, twenty-one millions five hundred thousand dollars of the state debts were assumed in specified proportions; and it was particularly enacted that no certificate should be received from a state creditor which could be "ascertained to have been issued for any purpose other than compensations and expenditures for services or supplies towards the prosecution of the late war, and the defence of the United States, or of some part thereof, during the same."

In December 1784, a law was passed to appoint commissioners to buy land along the Delaware, near its falls, and to build the necessary public buildings for Congress and government officials. However, the southern states were strong enough to halt this law by blocking the allocation of funds, which needed approval from nine states. The current government had already discussed this issue, and various locations from the Delaware to the Potomac had been strongly supported, but a majority in both houses couldn't agree on any single place. Attempts to change the temporary location of Congress were equally unsuccessful. Even though New York was clearly too far east, numerous conflicting interests came into play whenever the topic arose, preventing any proposal that pointed to a more central location from succeeding. Eventually, an agreement was reached between the supporters of Philadelphia and the Potomac that Congress would move to Philadelphia for ten years, during which time buildings would be constructed at a site on the Potomac for the government to relocate to after the decade ended. This agreement brought together the representatives of Pennsylvania and Delaware with the supporters of the Potomac, favoring both the temporary and permanent locations they had settled on. This resulted in a majority supporting the two sites, and a bill aligned with this arrangement passed both houses by narrow margins. This action was soon followed by an amendment to a bill before the Senate regarding funding the national debt. The amendment was similar in principle to one that had previously failed in the House of Representatives. It stipulated that $21.5 million of state debts would be assumed in specified shares, and it specifically stated that no certificate from a state creditor would be accepted if it was "determined to have been issued for any purpose other than compensations and expenditures for services or supplies towards the prosecution of the late war, and the defense of the United States, or some part thereof, during the same."

When the question was taken in the house of representatives on this amendment, two members representing districts on the Potomac, who, in all the previous stages of the business, had voted against the assumption, declared themselves in its favour; and thus the majority was changed.[45]

When the House of Representatives voted on this amendment, two members from districts along the Potomac, who had voted against the assumption in all previous discussions, switched their position and supported it instead; this changed the majority. [45]

Thus was a measure carried, which was supported and opposed with a degree of zeal and earnestness not often manifested; and which furnished presages, not to be mistaken, that the spirit with which the opposite opinions had been maintained, would not yield, contentedly, to the decision of a bare majority. This measure has constituted one of the great grounds of accusation against the first administration of the general government; and it is fair to acknowledge, that though, in its progress, it derived no aid from the President, whose opinion remained in his own bosom, it received the full approbation of his judgment.

Thus, a measure was passed, receiving both strong support and opposition with a level of enthusiasm and seriousness that isn't usually seen. It hinted clearly that the intensity with which opposing views were held would not simply accept the verdict of a slim majority. This measure became a major point of criticism against the first administration of the federal government; it's worth noting that, although the President kept his thoughts to himself during the process, he fully approved of the measure in his own judgment.

A bill, at length, passed both houses, funding the debt upon principles which lessened considerably the weight of the public burdens, and was entirely satisfactory to the public creditors. The proceeds of the sales of the lands lying in the western territory, and, by a subsequent act of the same session, the surplus product of the revenue after satisfying the appropriations which were charged upon it, with the addition of two millions, which the President was authorized to borrow at five per centum, constituted a sinking fund to be applied to the reduction of the debt.

A bill eventually passed both houses, funding the debt in ways that significantly reduced the burden on the public and fully satisfied the creditors. The proceeds from the sales of land in the western territory, along with a subsequent act from the same session that included the surplus revenue after fulfilling the charged appropriations, plus an additional two million that the President was allowed to borrow at five percent, created a sinking fund to be used for debt reduction.

The effect of this measure was great and rapid. The public paper suddenly rose, and was for a short time above par. The immense wealth which individuals acquired by this unexpected appreciation, could not be viewed with indifference. Those who participated in its advantages, regarded the author of a system to which they were so greatly indebted, with an enthusiasm of attachment to which scarcely any limits were assigned. To many others, this adventitious collection of wealth in particular hands, was a subject rather of chagrin than of pleasure; and the reputation which the success of his plans gave to the secretary of the treasury, was not contemplated with unconcern. As if the debt had been created by the existing government, not by a war which gave liberty and independence to the United States, its being funded was ascribed by many, not to a sense of justice, and to a liberal and enlightened policy, but to the desire of bestowing on the government an artificial strength, by the creation of a monied interest which would be subservient to its will.

The impact of this measure was significant and quick. The public bonds suddenly rose and briefly went above par. The huge wealth that individuals gained from this unexpected increase couldn't be overlooked. Those who benefited from it viewed the creator of this system, to whom they owed so much, with an enthusiasm that had hardly any limits. For many others, this sudden accumulation of wealth in the hands of a few was more frustrating than enjoyable; and the reputation that the success of his plans brought to the secretary of the treasury was not viewed without concern. As if the debt had been created by the current government, rather than a war that granted liberty and independence to the United States, its funding was seen by many not as a matter of justice or a progressive and enlightened policy, but as an attempt to give the government an artificial strength by establishing a monetary interest that would serve its interests.

The effects produced by giving the debt a permanent value, justified the predictions of those whose anticipations had been most favourable. The sudden increase of monied capital derived from it, invigorated commerce, and gave a new stimulus to agriculture.

The effects of assigning a permanent value to the debt confirmed the forecasts of those who had the most optimistic expectations. The sudden rise in money capital resulting from this boosted commerce and provided a fresh incentive for agriculture.

About this time, there was a great and visible improvement in the circumstances of the people. Although the funding system was certainly not inoperative in producing this improvement, it can not be justly ascribed to any single cause. Progressive industry had gradually repaired the losses sustained by the war; and the influence of the constitution on habits of thinking and acting, though silent, was considerable. In depriving the states of the power to impair the obligation of contracts, or to make any thing but gold and silver a tender in payment of debts, the conviction was impressed on that portion of society which had looked to the government for relief from embarrassment, that personal exertions alone could free them from difficulties; and an increased degree of industry and economy was the natural consequence of this opinion.

About this time, there was a noticeable improvement in the people's circumstances. While the funding system definitely played a role in this improvement, it can't be attributed to any one cause alone. Gradual progress in industry helped to recover the losses caused by the war; and the impact of the constitution on people's ways of thinking and acting, though subtle, was significant. By taking away the states' power to undermine the obligation of contracts or to allow anything other than gold and silver as legal tender for debts, it became clear to those in society who relied on the government for help that only their own efforts could get them out of trouble; this belief naturally led to greater industry and frugality.

Adjournment of congress.

On the 12th of August, after an arduous session, congress adjourned, to meet in Philadelphia the first Monday in the following December.

On August 12th, after a tough session, Congress adjourned to meet again in Philadelphia on the first Monday of the following December.

While the discussions in the national legislature related to subjects, and were conducted in a temper, well calculated to rouse the active spirit of party, the external relations of the United States wore an aspect not perfectly serene. To the hostile temper manifested by the Indians on the western and southern frontiers, an increased degree of importance was given by the apprehension that their discontents were fomented by the intrigues of Britain and of Spain. From Canada, the Indians of the north-west were understood to be furnished with the means of prosecuting a war which they were stimulated to continue; and, to the influence of the governor of the Floridas had been partly attributed the failure of the negotiation with the Creeks. That this influence would still be exerted to prevent a friendly intercourse with that nation was firmly believed; and it was feared that Spain might take a part in the open hostilities threatened by the irritable dispositions of individuals in both countries. From the intimate connexion subsisting between the members of the house of Bourbon, this event was peculiarly deprecated; and the means of avoiding it were sought with solicitude. These considerations determined the President to make another effort at negotiation; but, to preserve the respect of these savages for the United States, it was at the same time resolved that the agent to be employed should visit the country on other pretexts, and should carry a letter of introduction to M'Gillivray, blending with other subjects a strong representation of the miseries which a war with the United States would bring upon his people; and an earnest exhortation to repair with the chiefs of his nation to the seat of the federal government, in order to effect a solid and satisfactory peace. Colonel Willett was selected for this service; and he acquitted himself so well of the duty assigned to him, as to induce the chiefs of the nation, with M'Gillivray at their head, to repair to New York, where negotiations were opened which terminated in a treaty of peace,[46] signed on the 7th day of August.[47]

While the discussions in the national legislature were about various topics, they were conducted in a way that really sparked party spirit. However, the external relations of the United States were looking somewhat tense. The angry attitude displayed by the Indians on the western and southern frontiers was made even more significant by concerns that their grievances were being stirred up by the interference of Britain and Spain. From Canada, it was believed that the Indians in the northwest were being supplied with the means to continue a war they were encouraged to pursue; and the failure of negotiations with the Creeks was partly attributed to the influence of the governor of the Floridas. There was a strong belief that this influence would continue to hinder friendly relations with that nation, and there were fears that Spain might get involved in the open hostilities being threatened by the restless attitudes of people in both countries. Given the close ties among the members of the house of Bourbon, this possibility was particularly troubling, and efforts were made to avoid it. These factors led the President to try negotiating again; however, to maintain the respect of these tribes for the United States, it was also decided that the agent sent would enter the region under different pretenses and would carry a letter of introduction to M'Gillivray, addressing various issues while also strongly highlighting the suffering that a war with the United States would cause his people. He would earnestly urge M'Gillivray to come with his chiefs to the federal government to secure a solid and satisfactory peace. Colonel Willett was chosen for this task, and he performed so well that he convinced the nation's chiefs, led by M'Gillivray, to come to New York, where negotiations began that resulted in a peace treaty,[46] signed on August 7th.[47]

Treaty with the Creek Indians.

The pacific overtures made to the Indians of the Wabash and the Miamis not having been equally successful, the western frontiers were still exposed to their destructive incursions. A long course of experience had convinced the President that, on the failure of negotiation, sound policy and true economy, not less than humanity, required the immediate employment of a force which should carry death and destruction into the heart of the hostile settlements. Either not feeling the same impressions, or disposed to indulge the wishes of the western people, who declared openly their preference for desultory military expeditions, congress did not adopt measures corresponding with the wishes of the executive, and the military establishment[48] was not equal to the exigency. The distresses of the frontier establishment, therefore, still continued; and the hostility they had originally manifested to the constitution, sustained no diminution.

The peaceful efforts made to engage with the Wabash and Miami tribes weren't as successful, leaving the western frontiers still vulnerable to their destructive attacks. A long history had led the President to believe that when negotiations failed, sound policy and true economy, as well as humanity, required the immediate use of force to bring destruction to the heart of the hostile settlements. Congress, either not sharing the same views or wanting to cater to the desires of the western communities, who openly preferred sporadic military actions, did not take actions that matched the executive's wishes, and the military setup[48] wasn't sufficient for the situation. As a result, the struggles of the frontier establishment continued, and the hostility they originally showed toward the constitution did not lessen.

United States in relations with Great Britain and Spain.

No progress had been made in adjusting the points of controversy with Spain and Britain. With the former power, the question of boundary remained unsettled; and the cabinet of Madrid discovered no disposition to relax the rigour of its pretensions respecting the navigation of the Mississippi. Its general conduct furnished no foundation for a hope that its dispositions towards the United States were friendly, or that it could view their growing power without jealousy.

No progress had been made in resolving the disputes with Spain and Britain. With Spain, the boundary issue was still unresolved, and the Madrid government showed no willingness to loosen its strict claims regarding navigation on the Mississippi River. Its overall attitude gave no reason to believe that it was friendly toward the United States or that it could view their increasing power without jealousy.

The non-execution of the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th articles of the treaty of peace, still furnished the United States and Great Britain with matter for reciprocal crimination, which there was the more difficulty in removing, because no diplomatic intercourse was maintained between them. The cabinet of St. James having never appointed a minister to the United States, and Mr. Adams having returned from London without effecting the object of his mission, the American government felt some difficulty in repeating advances which had been treated with neglect. Yet there was much reason to desire full explanations with the English government, and to understand perfectly its views and intentions. The subjects for discussion were delicate in their nature, and could not be permitted to remain in their present state, without hazarding the most serious consequences. The detention of a part of the territory of the United States, was a circumstance of much importance to the honour, as well as to the interests of the nation, and the commercial intercourse between the two countries was so extensive, as to require amicable and permanent regulations. The early attention of the President had been directed to these subjects; and, in October, 1789, he had resolved on taking informal measures to sound the British cabinet, and to ascertain its views respecting them. This negotiation was entrusted to Mr. Gouverneur Morris, who had been carried by private business to Europe; and he conducted it with ability and address, but was unable to bring it to a happy conclusion. The result of his conferences with the Duke of Leeds, and with Mr. Pitt, was a conviction that the British government, considering the posts they occupied on the southern side of the great lakes as essential to their monopoly of the fur trade, would surrender them reluctantly, and was not desirous of entering into a commercial treaty. Those ministers expressed a wish to be on the best terms with America; but repeated the complaints which had been previously made by Lord Carmarthen, of the non-execution of the treaty of peace on the part of the United States. To the observations made by Mr. Morris, that the constitution lately adopted, and the courts established under it, amounted to a full compliance with that treaty on the part of the American government, it was answered, that losses had already been sustained in consequence of the obstructions given by the states to the fair operation of that instrument, which rendered a faithful observance of it, at present, impossible; and, in a note, the Duke of Leeds avowed the intention, if the delay on the part of the American government to fulfil its engagements made in the treaty should have rendered their final completion impracticable, to retard the fulfilment of those which depended entirely on Great Britain, until redress should be granted to the subjects of his majesty on the specific points of the treaty itself, or a fair and just compensation obtained for the non-performance of those stipulations which the United States had failed to observe. Though urged by Mr. Morris to state explicitly in what respects, and to what degree, he considered the final completion of those engagements to which the United States were bound, as having been rendered impracticable, no such statement was given; and the British government seemed inclined to avoid, for the present, those full and satisfactory explanations, which were sought on the part of the United States.

The failure to execute the 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th articles of the peace treaty continued to provide both the United States and Great Britain with reasons to accuse each other, making it harder to resolve these issues because there was no diplomatic communication between them. The British government had never appointed a minister to the United States, and Mr. Adams returned from London without achieving his mission's goals, leaving the American government hesitant to make overtures that had been ignored before. However, there was a strong desire for clear explanations from the British government to fully understand its views and intentions. The topics for discussion were sensitive and couldn’t be left unresolved without risking serious consequences. The holding of a portion of U.S. territory was significant for both the dignity and interests of the nation, and the extensive trade between the two countries required friendly and lasting regulations. The President had already focused on these issues, and in October 1789, he decided to take informal steps to gauge the British government’s stance on them. This effort was entrusted to Mr. Gouverneur Morris, who was in Europe for personal business; he handled it skillfully but couldn’t bring it to a successful outcome. His discussions with the Duke of Leeds and Mr. Pitt led to the conclusion that the British government, viewing their forts on the southern side of the Great Lakes as critical to their fur trade monopoly, would be reluctant to relinquish them and did not wish to establish a commercial treaty. These ministers expressed a desire to maintain good relations with America but reiterated the prior complaints by Lord Carmarthen regarding the non-implementation of the peace treaty by the United States. When Mr. Morris pointed out that the recently adopted constitution and the courts under it represented full compliance with the treaty by the American government, he was told that losses had already been incurred because the states obstructed the treaty's proper execution, making faithful adherence to it impossible at that time. In a note, the Duke of Leeds stated that if the American government’s delays in fulfilling its treaty obligations made their final completion impractical, he would hold off on fulfilling those obligations dependent solely on Britain until justice was served for his Majesty’s subjects regarding specific points in the treaty or a fair compensation was secured for the non-fulfillment of obligations the United States had failed to meet. Despite Mr. Morris urging him to specify how and to what extent he believed the final fulfillment of the U.S. obligations had become impractical, no such details were provided, and the British government seemed inclined to avoid giving the complete and satisfactory explanations that the United States was seeking.

After detailing the motives which in his opinion influenced the English cabinet in wishing to suspend for a time all discussions with America, Mr. Morris observed, "perhaps there never was a moment in which this country felt herself greater; and consequently, it is the most unfavourable moment to obtain advantageous terms from her in any bargain."

After explaining the reasons that he believed motivated the English cabinet to pause all discussions with America, Mr. Morris noted, "there may never have been a time when this country felt more powerful; therefore, this is the least favorable time to secure beneficial terms in any deal."

Whilst these negotiations were pending, intelligence was received at London of the attack made on the British settlement at Nootka Sound; and preparations were instantly made to resent the insult alleged to have been offered to the nation. The high ground taken on this occasion by the government, and the vigour with which it armed in support of its pretensions, furnished strong reasons for the opinion that a war with Spain, and probably with France, would soon be commenced.

While these negotiations were ongoing, news arrived in London about the attack on the British settlement at Nootka Sound; and preparations were quickly made to respond to the insult that was said to have been directed at the nation. The strong stance taken by the government on this issue, along with the energy it put into arming itself in defense of its claims, gave solid grounds for the belief that a war with Spain, and likely with France, would soon begin.

In America, this was considered as a favourable juncture for urging the claims of the United States to the free navigation of the Mississippi. Mr. Carmichael, their charge d'affaires at the court of Madrid, was instructed not only to press this point with earnestness, but to use his utmost endeavours to secure the unmolested use of that river in future, by obtaining a cession of the island of New Orleans, and of the Floridas. A full equivalent for this cession would be found, it was said, in the sincere friendship of the United States, and in the security it would give to the territories of Spain, west of the Mississippi.

In America, this was seen as a great opportunity to push for the United States' right to navigate the Mississippi River freely. Mr. Carmichael, their chargé d'affaires at the court of Madrid, was instructed not only to strongly advocate for this issue but also to do everything possible to ensure unhindered access to the river in the future by securing the transfer of the island of New Orleans and the Floridas. It was suggested that a fair exchange for this transfer would be the genuine friendship of the United States and the security it would provide for Spain's territories west of the Mississippi.

Mr. Carmichael was also instructed to point the attention of the Spanish government to the peculiar situation of the United States. To one half of their territory, the use of the Mississippi was indispensable. No efforts could prevent their acquiring it. That they would acquire it, either by acting separately, or in conjunction with Great Britain, was one of those inevitable events against which human wisdom could make no provision. To the serious consideration of the Spanish government, therefore, were submitted the consequences which must result to their whole empire in America, either from hostilities with the United States, or from a seizure of Louisiana by Great Britain.

Mr. Carmichael was also told to bring the attention of the Spanish government to the unique situation of the United States. For half of their territory, access to the Mississippi was essential. No efforts could stop them from obtaining it. They would get it, either by acting alone or in cooperation with Great Britain, which was one of those unavoidable events that human wisdom couldn't prevent. Therefore, the Spanish government was urged to seriously consider the repercussions that would affect their entire empire in America, whether from conflicts with the United States or from Great Britain's takeover of Louisiana.

The opinion, that in the event of war between Great Britain and Spain, Louisiana would be invaded from Canada, was not a mere suggestion for the purpose of aiding the negotiations at Madrid. It was seriously adopted by the American government; and the attention of the executive was turned to the measures which it would be proper to take, should application be made for permission to march a body of troops, through the unsettled territories of the United States, into the dominions of Spain; or should the attempt be made to march them, without permission.

The idea that if war broke out between Great Britain and Spain, Louisiana would be invaded from Canada wasn't just a suggestion to help the negotiations in Madrid. The American government took it seriously, and the executive branch focused on what actions would be appropriate if someone asked to send troops through the unsettled territories of the United States into Spanish territory, or if they tried to do it without permission.

Among the circumstances which contributed to the opinion that, in the event of war, the arms of Great Britain would be directed against the settlements of Spain in America, was the continuance of Lord Dorchester in the government of Canada. This nobleman had intimated a wish to visit New York on his return to England; but the prospect of a rupture with Spain had determined him to remain in Canada. Under the pretext of making his acknowledgments for the readiness with which his desire to pass through New York had been acceded to, his lordship despatched Major Beck with, a member of his family, to sound the American government, and if possible, to ascertain its dispositions towards the two nations. Alluding to the negotiations which had been commenced in London, this gentleman endeavoured to assign a satisfactory cause for the delays which had intervened. It was not improbable, he said, that these delays, and some other circumstances, might have impressed Mr. Morris with an idea of backwardness on the part of the British ministry. His lordship, however, had directed him to say, that an inference of this sort would not, in his opinion, be well founded, as he had reason to believe that the British cabinet was inclined not only towards a friendly intercourse, but towards an alliance with the United States.

Among the factors that led to the belief that, in the event of war, Great Britain's military efforts would be aimed at Spain's settlements in America was Lord Dorchester’s continued leadership in Canada. He had expressed a desire to stop by New York on his way back to England, but the possibility of conflict with Spain made him decide to stay in Canada. Under the pretense of expressing gratitude for the willingness to accommodate his desire to go through New York, he sent Major Beck along with a family member to assess the American government's stance and, if possible, learn about its feelings toward both countries. Referring to the discussions that had started in London, this gentleman tried to explain the reasons behind the delays that had occurred. He mentioned that it was not unlikely these delays, along with other circumstances, might have led Mr. Morris to think that the British government was hesitant. However, his lordship instructed him to clarify that such an inference would not be justified, as he believed the British cabinet was not only open to friendly relations but also interested in an alliance with the United States.

Major Beckwith represented the particular ground of quarrel as one which ought to interest all commercial nations in favour of the views of Great Britain; and, from that circumstance, he presumed that, should a war ensue, the United States would find their interest in taking part with Britain, rather than with Spain.

Major Beckwith framed the specific issue as one that should engage all trading nations to support Britain's position; and, because of that, he assumed that if a war broke out, the United States would see it in their best interest to side with Britain rather than Spain.

After expressing the concern with which Lord Dorchester had heard of the depredations of the savages on the western frontier of the United States, he declared that his lordship, so far from countenancing these depredations, had taken every proper opportunity to impress upon the Indians a pacific disposition; and that, on his first hearing of the outrages lately committed, he had sent a messenger to endeavour to prevent them. Major Beckwith further intimated, that the perpetrators of the late murders were banditti, composed chiefly of Creeks and Cherokees, in the Spanish interest, over whom the governor of Canada possessed no influence.

After explaining how concerned Lord Dorchester was about the attacks by Native Americans on the western frontier of the United States, he stated that his lordship, far from supporting these attacks, had used every suitable opportunity to encourage the Indians to maintain peace. He mentioned that as soon as he heard about the recent violence, he sent a messenger to try to prevent it. Major Beckwith also suggested that those responsible for the recent murders were a band of outlaws primarily made up of Creeks and Cherokees who were aligned with Spanish interests, and that the governor of Canada had no control over them.

These communications were laid before the President, and appeared to him to afford an explanation of the delays experienced by Mr. Morris. He was persuaded that a disposition existed in the cabinet of London to retain things in their actual situation, until the intentions of the American government should be ascertained with respect to the war supposed to be approaching. If the United States would enter into an alliance with Great Britain, and would make a common cause with her against Spain, the way would be smoothed to the attainment of all their objects: but if America should be disinclined to such a connexion, and especially, if she should manifest any partiality towards Spain, no progress would be made in the attempt to adjust the point of difference between the two nations. Taking this view of the subject, he directed that the further communications of Mr. Beckwith should be heard civilly, and that their want of official authenticity should be hinted delicately, without using any expressions which might, in the most remote degree, impair the freedom of the United States, to pursue, without reproach, in the expected war, such a line of conduct as their interests or honour might dictate.

These communications were presented to the President, and he believed they explained the delays faced by Mr. Morris. He was convinced that the London cabinet wanted to keep things as they were until the American government's intentions regarding the anticipated war were clear. If the United States were to form an alliance with Great Britain and join forces against Spain, it would pave the way to achieving all their goals. However, if America were not inclined towards such a connection, especially if it showed any favoritism towards Spain, no progress would be made in resolving the differences between the two nations. Considering this, he instructed that Mr. Beckwith’s further communications should be heard politely, and that their lack of official authenticity should be subtly pointed out, without any wording that could, even slightly, compromise the United States' freedom to act in the upcoming war according to what their interests or honor dictated.

In the opinion that it would not only be useless but dishonourable further to press a commercial treaty, or the exchange of ministers, and that the subject of the western posts ought not again to be moved on the part of the United States, until they should be in a condition to speak a decisive language, the powers given to Mr. Morris were withdrawn. Should the interest of Britain produce a disposition favourable to an amicable arrangement of differences, and to a liberal commercial intercourse secured by compact, it was believed that she would make the requisite advances; until then, or until some other change of circumstances should require a change of conduct, things were to remain in their actual situation.

In the view that it would not only be pointless but also shameful to continue pushing for a trade agreement or the exchange of diplomats, and that the issue of the western posts should not be brought up again by the United States until they were ready to speak decisively, the powers given to Mr. Morris were retracted. It was thought that if Britain's interests led to a willingness to peacefully resolve differences and establish a solid trade relationship through an agreement, she would take the necessary steps; until that happened, or until some other changes in circumstances called for a different approach, things were to stay as they were.

About the time of adopting this resolution, the dispute between Britain and Spain was adjusted. Finding France unwilling to engage in his quarrel, his Catholic Majesty, too weak to encounter alone the force of the British empire, yielded every point in controversy; and thus were terminated for the present, both the fear of inconveniences, and the hope of advantages which might result to America from hostilities between the two powers, whose dominions were in her neighbourhood, and with each of whom she was already engaged in controversies not easily to be accommodated.

About the time this decision was made, the conflict between Britain and Spain was resolved. Since France was reluctant to get involved in his conflict, and his Catholic Majesty was too weak to face the British Empire on his own, he gave in on every point of disagreement. This brought an end, for now, to both the worry about possible drawbacks and the hope for benefits that could come to America from hostilities between the two powers, whose territories were nearby, and with each of whom America was already in disputes that were hard to settle.

The president visits Mount Vernon.

Incessant application to public business, and the consequent change of active for sedentary habits, had greatly impaired the constitution of the President; and, during the last session of congress, he had, for the second time since entering on the duties of his present station, been attacked by a severe disease which reduced him to the brink of the grave. Exercise and a temporary relief from the cares of office being essential to the restoration of his health, he determined, for the short interval afforded by the recess of the legislature, to retire to the tranquil shades of Mount Vernon. After returning from a visit to Rhode Island,[49] which state not having then adopted the American constitution, had not been included in his late tour through New England, he took leave of New York; and hastened to that peaceful retreat, and those rural employments, his taste for which neither military glory, nor political power, could ever diminish.

Incessant involvement in public affairs, along with the shift from active to sedentary habits, had significantly weakened the President's health. During the last session of Congress, he had been struck by a serious illness for the second time since taking on the responsibilities of his position, bringing him close to death. Exercise and a short break from his official duties were crucial for his recovery, so he decided to retreat to the calming environment of Mount Vernon during the brief recess of the legislature. After returning from a visit to Rhode Island,[49] which had not yet adopted the American Constitution and was therefore excluded from his recent tour of New England, he said goodbye to New York and hurried to that serene getaway and the rural activities he enjoyed, which neither military fame nor political power could ever diminish.

After a short indulgence in these favourite scenes, it became necessary to repair to Philadelphia, in order to meet the national legislature.

After a brief enjoyment of these favorite places, it became necessary to head to Philadelphia to meet with the national legislature.

The president's speech.

In the speech delivered to congress at the commencement of their third session, the President expressed much satisfaction at the favourable prospect of public affairs; and particularly noticed the progress of public credit, and the productiveness of the revenue.

In the speech given to Congress at the start of their third session, the President expressed great satisfaction with the positive outlook on public affairs; he specifically highlighted the improvement of public credit and the effectiveness of the revenue.

Adverting to foreign nations,[50] he said, "the disturbed situation of Europe, and particularly the critical posture of the great maritime powers, whilst it ought to make us more thankful for the general peace and security enjoyed by the United States, reminds us at the same time of the circumspection with which it becomes us to preserve these blessings. It requires also, that we should not overlook the tendency of a war, and even of preparations for war among the nations most concerned in active commerce with this country, to abridge the means, and thereby at least to enhance the price, of transporting its valuable productions to their proper market." To the serious reflection of congress was recommended the prevention of embarrassments from these contingencies, by such encouragement to American navigation as would render the commerce and agriculture of the United States less dependent on foreign bottoms.

Referring to foreign nations,[50] he said, "the troubled state of Europe, especially the serious situation of the major maritime powers, should not only make us more grateful for the peace and security we enjoy in the United States but also remind us to be careful in preserving these blessings. We must also recognize that war, or even the preparations for war among nations that are heavily involved in trade with this country, could limit our ability to transport valuable goods to their proper markets and, as a result, increase their costs." He urged Congress to seriously consider ways to avoid complications from these situations by supporting American shipping so that U.S. commerce and agriculture would rely less on foreign vessels.

After expressing to the house of representatives his confidence arising from the sufficiency of the revenues already established, for the objects to which they were appropriated, he added, "allow me moreover to hope that it will be a favourite policy with you not merely to secure a payment of the interest of the debt funded, but as far, and as fast as the growing resources of the country will permit, to exonerate it of the principal itself." Many subjects relative to the interior government were succinctly and briefly mentioned; and the speech concluded with the following impressive and admonitory sentiment. "In pursuing the various and weighty business of the present session, I indulge the fullest persuasion that your consultations will be marked with wisdom, and animated by the love of country. In whatever belongs to my duty, you shall have all the co-operation which an undiminished zeal for its welfare can inspire. It will be happy for us both, and our best reward, if by a successful administration of our respective trusts, we can make the established government more and more instrumental in promoting the good of our fellow citizens, and more and more the object of their attachment and confidence."

After sharing with the House of Representatives his confidence in the adequacy of the existing revenues for their intended purposes, he added, "I also hope it will be a priority for you not only to ensure the payment of the interest on the funded debt but also, as much and as quickly as the country's growing resources allow, to pay down the principal itself." Many topics related to domestic governance were briefly and succinctly addressed, and the speech concluded with this powerful and cautionary message: "As you tackle the various important issues of this session, I am fully confident that your discussions will be guided by wisdom and driven by a love for our country. In everything that pertains to my responsibilities, you can count on my complete support, fueled by unwavering commitment to its welfare. It will be beneficial for both of us, and our greatest reward, if through the effective management of our roles, we can make the established government increasingly effective in promoting the well-being of our fellow citizens and more and more an object of their attachment and trust."

The addresses of the two houses, in answer to the speech, proved that the harmony between the executive and legislative departments, with which the government had gone into operation, had sustained no essential interruption. But in the short debate which took place on the occasion, in the house of representatives, a direct disapprobation of one of the measures of the executive government was, for the first time, openly expressed.

The addresses of the two houses, in response to the speech, showed that the cooperation between the executive and legislative branches, with which the government had started, had not faced any major disruption. However, in the brief debate that occurred in the House of Representatives on that occasion, a clear disapproval of one of the executive government's measures was openly stated for the first time.

In the treaty lately concluded with the Creeks, an extensive territory claimed by Georgia, under treaties, the validity of which was contested by the Indian chiefs, had been entirely, or in great part, relinquished. This relinquishment excited serious discontents in that state; and was censured by General Jackson with considerable warmth, as an unjustifiable abandonment of the rights and interests of Georgia. No specific motion, however, was made, and the subject was permitted to pass away for the present.

In the recent treaty made with the Creeks, a large area claimed by Georgia, based on treaties that the Indian chiefs disputed, was mostly or entirely given up. This concession caused major dissatisfaction in the state; General Jackson strongly criticized it as an unfair abandonment of Georgia's rights and interests. However, no specific action was taken, and the issue was allowed to fade away for now.

Scarcely were the debates on the address concluded, when several interesting reports were received from the secretary of the treasury, suggesting such further measures as were deemed necessary for the establishment of public credit.

Scarcely had the discussions on the address wrapped up when several intriguing reports came in from the secretary of the treasury, suggesting further actions that were considered necessary for establishing public credit.

It will be recollected that in his original report on this subject, the secretary had recommended the assumption of the state debts; and had proposed to enable the treasury to meet the increased demand upon it, which this measure would occasion, by an augmentation of the duties on imported wines, spirits, tea, and coffee, and by imposing duties on spirits distilled within the country. The assumption not having been adopted until late in the session, the discussion on the revenue which would be required for this portion of the public debt did not commence, until the house had become impatient for an adjournment. As much contrariety of opinion was disclosed, and the subject did not press,[51] it was deferred to the ensuing session; and an order was made, requiring the secretary of the treasury to prepare and report such further provision as might, in his opinion, be necessary for establishing the public credit. In obedience to this order, several reports had been prepared, the first of which repeated the recommendation of an additional impost on foreign distilled spirits, and of a duty on spirits distilled within the United States. The estimated revenue from these sources was eight hundred and seventy-seven thousand five hundred dollars, affording a small excess over the sum which would be required to pay the interest on the assumed debt. The policy of the measure was discussed in a well digested and able argument, detailing many motives, in addition to those assigned in his original report, for preferring the system now recommended, to accumulated burdens on commerce, or to a direct tax on lands.

It will be remembered that in his initial report on this topic, the secretary suggested taking on the state debts and proposed that the treasury be prepared for the increased demand this would create by raising the duties on imported wines, spirits, tea, and coffee, as well as imposing duties on spirits produced domestically. Since the assumption was not adopted until late in the session, discussions about the revenue needed for this part of the public debt did not start until the house was eager to adjourn. Because there was significant disagreement, and the topic was not urgent,[51] it was postponed to the next session; an order was issued requiring the secretary of the treasury to prepare and report any additional provisions he deemed necessary to establish public credit. In response to this order, several reports were created, the first of which reiterated the recommendation for an additional tax on foreign distilled spirits and a duty on spirits made in the United States. The estimated revenue from these sources was eight hundred seventy-seven thousand five hundred dollars, which provided a small surplus over the amount needed to cover the interest on the assumed debt. The policy of the measure was examined in a thoughtful and well-articulated argument, outlining many reasons, beyond those listed in his original report, for favoring the system now being proposed over increasing burdens on commerce or implementing a direct tax on land.

A new tax is the certain rallying point for all those who are unfriendly to the administration, or to the minister by whom it is proposed. But that recommended by the secretary, contained intrinsic causes of objection which would necessarily add to the number of its enemies. All that powerful party in the United States, which attached itself to the local, rather than to the general government, would inevitably contemplate any system of internal revenue with jealous disapprobation. They considered the imposition of a tax by congress on any domestic manufacture, as the intrusion of a foreign power into their particular concerns, which excited serious apprehensions for state importance, and for liberty. In the real or supposed interests of many individuals was also found a distinct motive for hostility to the measure. A large portion of the American population, especially that which had spread itself over the extensive regions of the west, consuming imported articles to a very inconsiderable amount, was not much affected by the impost on foreign merchandize. But the duty on spirits distilled within the United States reached them, and consequently rendered them hostile to the tax.

A new tax is definitely a rallying point for everyone who dislikes the administration or the minister suggesting it. However, the one proposed by the secretary had built-in objections that would only increase its opponents. The powerful faction in the United States that preferred local governance over federal would always view any system of internal revenue with jealousy and disapproval. They saw a tax imposed by Congress on any domestic production as an unwelcome outside interference in their local affairs, which raised serious concerns about state rights and personal freedom. Additionally, many individuals had their own reasons for opposing the measure. A significant part of the American population, especially those who had settled in the vast west and consumed very few imported goods, were not greatly affected by the tax on foreign products. However, the tax on spirits produced within the United States directly impacted them, making them opposed to the tax.

1791
Debate on the excise law.

A bill, which was introduced in pursuance of the report, was opposed with great vehemence by a majority of the southern and western members. By some of them it was insisted that no sufficient testimony had yet been exhibited, that the taxes already imposed would not be equal to the exigencies of the public. But, admitting the propriety of additional burdens on the people, it was contended that other sources of revenue, less exceptionable and less odious than this, might be explored. The duty was branded with the hateful epithet of an excise, a species of taxation, it was said, so peculiarly oppressive as to be abhorred even in England; and which was totally incompatible with the spirit of liberty. The facility with which it might be extended to other objects, was urged against its admission into the American system; and declarations made against it by the congress of 1775, were quoted in confirmation of the justice with which inherent vices were ascribed to this mode of collecting taxes. So great was the hostility manifested against it in some of the states, that the revenue officers might be endangered from the fury of the people; and, in all, it would increase a ferment which had been already extensively manifested. Resolutions of Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina, reprobating the assumption, were referred to as unequivocal evidences of growing dissatisfaction; and the last mentioned state had even expressed its decided hostility to any law of excise. The legislature of North Carolina had rejected with scorn, a proposal for taking an oath to support the constitution of the United States; had refused to admit persons sentenced to imprisonment under the laws of the United States into their jails; and another circumstance was alluded to, but not explained, which was said to exhibit a temper still more hostile to the general government than either of those which had been stated.

A bill introduced based on the report faced strong opposition from most of the southern and western members. Some argued that there wasn't enough evidence presented to prove that the current taxes would meet the public's needs. However, while acknowledging the need for additional taxes, they contended that there were other, less objectionable sources of revenue that could be explored. The duty was labeled with the disliked term "excise," a type of tax seen as particularly oppressive and even despised in England, which was entirely at odds with the spirit of freedom. Concerns were raised about how easily it could be applied to other areas, and references were made to declarations from Congress in 1775, which highlighted the inherent issues associated with this method of tax collection. The level of animosity directed at the bill in some states was so intense that revenue officers could be at risk from angry citizens; overall, it would stoke a discontent that had already become widespread. Resolutions from Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina condemning the proposal were cited as clear signs of increasing dissatisfaction; North Carolina had even shown outright opposition to any excise law. The North Carolina legislature had contemptuously rejected a proposal to take an oath to support the U.S. Constitution, had refused to hold individuals sentenced under U.S. laws in their jails, and another unnamed issue was mentioned that supposedly demonstrated an even greater hostility toward the federal government than the ones already discussed.

When required to produce a system in lieu of that which they so much execrated, the opponents of the bill alternately mentioned an increased duty on imported articles generally, a particular duty on molasses, a direct tax, a tax on salaries, pensions, and lawyers; a duty on newspapers, and a stamp act.

When asked to come up with a system instead of the one they strongly opposed, the opponents of the bill suggested various options, including a higher tax on all imported goods, a specific tax on molasses, a direct tax, taxes on salaries, pensions, and lawyer fees; a tax on newspapers, and a stamp act.

The friends of the bill contended, that the reasons for believing the existing revenue would be insufficient to meet the engagements of the United States, were as satisfactory as the nature of the case would admit, or as ought to be required. The estimates were founded on the best data which were attainable, and the funds already provided, had been calculated by the proper officer to pay the interest on that part of the debt only for which they were pledged. Those estimates were referred to as documents, from which it would be unsafe to depart. They were also in possession of official statements, showing the productiveness of the taxes from the time the revenue bill had been in operation; and arguments were drawn from these, demonstrating the danger to which the infant credit of the United States would be exposed, by relying on the existing funds for the interest on the assumed debt. It was not probable that the proposed duties would yield a sum much exceeding that which would be necessary; but should they fortunately do so, the surplus revenue might be advantageously employed in extinguishing a part of the principal. They were not, they said, of opinion, that a public debt was a public blessing, or that it ought to be perpetuated.

The supporters of the bill argued that the reasons for believing the current revenue would be insufficient to meet the obligations of the United States were as convincing as the situation allowed or as should be required. The estimates were based on the best available data, and the funds already set aside had been calculated by the appropriate official to cover the interest on that portion of the debt for which they were allocated. These estimates were referenced as documents that it would be risky to ignore. They also had official statements showing the revenue generated from taxes since the revenue bill had been in effect; arguments were made from these, demonstrating the risk to the fledgling credit of the United States by relying on the current funds for interest on the assumed debt. It was unlikely that the proposed duties would generate much more than what would be necessary; however, if they did exceed that amount, the surplus revenue could be effectively used to pay down part of the principal. They were not, they said, of the view that a public debt was a public good or that it should be maintained indefinitely.

An augmentation of the revenue being indispensable to the solidity of the public credit, a more eligible system than that proposed in the bill, could not, it was believed, be devised. Still further to burden commerce, would be a hazardous experiment which might afford no real supplies to the treasury. Until some lights should be derived from experience, it behoved the legislature to be cautious not to lay such impositions upon trade as might probably introduce a spirit of smuggling, which, with a nominal increase, would occasion a real diminution of revenue. In the opinion of the best judges, the impost on the mass of foreign merchandise could not safely be carried further for the present. The extent of the mercantile capital of the United States would not justify the attempt. Forcible arguments were also drawn from the policy and the justice of multiplying the subjects of taxation, and diversifying them by a union of internal with external objects.

An increase in revenue is essential for the stability of public credit, and it was believed that a better system than the one proposed in the bill could not be created. Further burdening commerce would be a risky move that might not provide any real funds to the treasury. Until more insights are gained from experience, the legislature must be careful not to impose such burdens on trade that could lead to smuggling, which could result in a nominal increase but a real decrease in revenue. According to the best experts, the tax on foreign goods cannot be safely raised any further at this time. The scale of the commercial capital in the United States does not support such an attempt. Strong arguments were also made for the policy and fairness of expanding the tax base and diversifying it by combining internal and external taxation.

Neither would a direct tax be adviseable. The experience of the world had proved, that a tax on consumption was less oppressive, and more productive, than a tax on either property or income. Without discussing the principles on which the fact was founded, the fact itself was incontestable, that, by insensible means, much larger sums might be drawn from any class of men, than could be extracted from them by open and direct taxes. To the latter system there were still other objections. The difficulty of carrying it into operation, no census having yet been taken, would not be inconsiderable; and the expense of collection through a country thinly settled, would be enormous. Add to this, that public opinion was believed to be more decidedly and unequivocally opposed to it, than to a duty on ardent spirits. North Carolina had expressed her hostility to the one as well as to the other, and several other states were known to disapprove of direct taxes. From the real objections which existed against them, and for other reasons suggested in the report of the secretary, they ought, it was said, to remain untouched, as a resource when some great emergency should require an exertion of all the faculties of the United States.

A direct tax wouldn't be advisable either. Experience has shown that a tax on consumption is less burdensome and more effective than a tax on property or income. Without getting into the reasons behind this fact, it's undeniable that, through subtle means, much bigger amounts can be collected from any group of people than could be obtained through explicit and direct taxes. There are also other issues with this approach. The challenge of implementing it would be significant, especially since no census has been taken yet, and the cost of collecting taxes in a sparsely populated country would be huge. Furthermore, public opinion is believed to be much more strongly against direct taxes than it is against a tax on liquor. North Carolina has expressed its opposition to both types of tax, and several other states are known to disapprove of direct taxes as well. Given the genuine concerns about them and other reasons mentioned in the Secretary's report, it was suggested that they should remain untouched as a possible option when a major emergency requires the full capabilities of the United States.

Against the substitution of a duty on internal negotiations, it was said, that revenue to any considerable extent could be collected from them only by means of a stamp act, which was not less obnoxious to popular resentment than an excise, would be less certainly productive than the proposed duties, and was, in every respect, less eligible.

Against the idea of replacing a duty on internal negotiations, it was argued that significant revenue could only be collected through a stamp act. This method was just as unpopular with the public as an excise tax, would likely generate less revenue than the suggested duties, and was, in all respects, a poorer choice.

The honour, the justice, and the faith of the United States were pledged, it was said, to that class of creditors for whose claims the bill under consideration was intended to provide. No means of making the provision had been suggested, which, on examination, would be found equally eligible with a duty on ardent spirits. Much of the public prejudice which appeared in certain parts of the United States against the measure, was to be ascribed to their hostility to the term "excise," a term which had been inaccurately applied to the duty in question. When the law should be carried into operation, it would be found not to possess those odious qualities which had excited resentment against a system of excise. In those states where the collection of a duty on spirits distilled within the country had become familiar to the people, the same prejudices did not exist. On the good sense and virtue of the nation they could confidently rely for acquiescence in a measure which the public exigencies rendered necessary, which tended to equalize the public burdens, and which in its execution would not be oppressive.

The honor, justice, and integrity of the United States were supposedly promised to the creditors whose claims the bill was meant to address. No alternative way of providing for this had been proposed that would be as effective as a tax on distilled spirits. A lot of the public opposition in certain areas of the United States to this measure was due to their aversion to the term "excise," which had been wrongly associated with the tax in question. Once the law was put into effect, it wouldn't have the negative aspects that had caused backlash against an excise system. In states where taxing domestically distilled spirits was already familiar to the people, those same objections weren’t present. They could rely on the common sense and virtue of the nation to support a necessary measure that would help balance public burdens and wouldn't be overly burdensome in its implementation.

A motion made by Mr. Jackson, to strike out that section which imposed a duty on domestic distilled spirits, was negatived by thirty-six to sixteen; and the bill was carried by thirty-five to twenty-one.

A motion by Mr. Jackson to remove the section that placed a duty on domestically distilled spirits was rejected by a vote of thirty-six to sixteen; and the bill was approved by thirty-five to twenty-one.

Some days after the passage of this bill, another question was brought forward, which was understood to involve principles of deep interest to the government.

Some days after this bill was passed, another question came up, which was seen as involving principles that were very important to the government.

On a national bank.

The secretary of the treasury had been the uniform advocate of a national bank. Believing that such an institution would be "of primary importance to the prosperous administration of the finances; and of the greatest utility in the operations connected with the support of public credit," he had earnestly recommended its adoption in the first general system which he presented to the view of congress; and, at the present session, had repeated that recommendation in a special report, containing a copious and perspicuous argument on the policy of the measure. A bill conforming to the plan he suggested was sent down from the senate, and was permitted to proceed, unmolested, in the house of representatives, to the third reading. On the final question, a great, and, it would seem, an unexpected opposition was made to its passage. Mr. Madison, Mr. Giles, Mr. Jackson, and Mr. Stone spoke against it. The general utility of banking systems was not admitted, and the particular bill before the house was censured on its merits; but the great strength of the argument was directed against the constitutional authority of congress to pass an act for incorporating a national bank.

The secretary of the treasury had consistently supported the idea of a national bank. He believed that such an institution would be "crucial for effectively managing finances and extremely helpful in supporting public credit." He had strongly recommended its establishment in the first major proposal he presented to Congress and repeated this recommendation in a detailed report during the current session, which included a clear and thorough argument for the policy. A bill based on his plan was sent down from the Senate and was allowed to move forward, without obstruction, in the House of Representatives to the third reading. However, when it came to the final vote, there was significant, and seemingly unexpected, opposition against its passage. Mr. Madison, Mr. Giles, Mr. Jackson, and Mr. Stone spoke out against it. The overall benefits of banking systems were not acknowledged, and the specific bill was criticized on its own merits; however, the main focus of the argument was on whether Congress had the constitutional authority to pass a law to create a national bank.

The government of the United States, it was said, was limited; and the powers which it might legitimately exercise were enumerated in the constitution itself. In this enumeration, the power now contended for was not to be found. Not being expressly given, it must be implied from those which were given, or it could not be vested in the government. The clauses under which it could be claimed were then reviewed and critically examined; and it was contended that, on fair construction, no one of these could be understood to imply so important a power as that of creating a corporation.

The U.S. government was said to be limited, with its legitimate powers listed out in the Constitution itself. In this list, the power being argued for was not included. Since it wasn't explicitly granted, it had to be inferred from those that were allowed, or else it couldn't be held by the government. The clauses that could be claimed were then examined closely, and it was argued that, under a reasonable interpretation, none of them could be understood to imply such a significant power as the ability to create a corporation.

The clause which enables congress to pass all laws necessary and proper to execute the specified powers, must, according to the natural and obvious force of the terms and the context, be limited to means necessary to the end and incident to the nature of the specified powers. The clause, it was said, was in fact merely declaratory of what would have resulted by unavoidable implication, as the appropriate, and as it were technical means of executing those powers. Some gentlemen observed, that "the true exposition of a necessary mean to produce a given end was that mean without which the end could not be produced."

The clause that allows Congress to create any laws necessary and proper to carry out its specific powers must, based on the clear meaning of the words and the context, be limited to methods that are necessary to achieve the end and related to the nature of those specified powers. It was argued that this clause was essentially just a statement of what would have been implied anyway, as the suitable and somewhat technical methods for executing those powers. Some individuals noted that "the correct understanding of a necessary means to achieve a certain end is that means without which the end could not be achieved."

The bill was supported by Mr. Ames, Mr. Sedgwick, Mr. Smith, of South Carolina, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Gerry, and Mr. Vining.

The bill was backed by Mr. Ames, Mr. Sedgwick, Mr. Smith from South Carolina, Mr. Lawrence, Mr. Boudinot, Mr. Gerry, and Mr. Vining.

The utility of banking institutions was said to be demonstrated by their effects. In all commercial countries they had been resorted to as an instrument of great efficacy in mercantile transactions; and even in the United States, their public and private advantages had been felt and acknowledged.

The usefulness of banks was shown through their impact. In all business-oriented countries, they were used as a powerful tool in commercial dealings; and even in the United States, their public and private benefits had been recognized and appreciated.

Respecting the policy of the measure, no well founded doubt could be entertained; but the objections to the constitutional authority of congress deserved to be seriously considered.

Respecting the policy of the measure, there was no reasonable doubt that could be entertained; however, the concerns about Congress's constitutional authority deserved serious consideration.

That the government was limited by the terms of its creation was not controverted; and that it could exercise only those powers which were conferred on it by the constitution, was admitted. If, on examination, that instrument should be found to forbid the passage of the bill, it must be rejected, though it would be with deep regret that its friends would suffer such an opportunity of serving their country to escape for the want of a constitutional power to improve it.

That the government was restricted by the terms of its creation was not disputed; and that it could only use the powers granted to it by the constitution was accepted. If, upon review, that document were to be found to prohibit the passage of the bill, it must be rejected, although it would be with great sadness that its supporters would see such an opportunity to serve their country slip away due to a lack of constitutional authority to make improvements.

In asserting the authority of the legislature to pass the bill, gentlemen contended, that incidental as well as express powers must necessarily belong to every government: and that, when a power is delegated to effect particular objects, all the known and usual means of effecting them, must pass as incidental to it. To remove all doubt on this subject, the constitution of the United States had recognized the principle, by enabling congress to make all laws which may be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the government. They maintained the sound construction of this grant to be a recognition of an authority in the national legislature, to employ all the known and usual means for executing the powers vested in the government. They then took a comprehensive view of those powers, and contended that a bank was a known and usual instrument by which several of them were exercised.

In arguing for the legislature's authority to pass the bill, the gentlemen stated that both incidental and explicit powers must naturally belong to every government. They claimed that when a power is given to achieve specific objectives, all the recognized and common means to accomplish those objectives must also be included as incidental to it. To eliminate any doubt on this matter, the Constitution of the United States acknowledged this principle by allowing Congress to create all laws that are necessary and proper for carrying out the powers granted to the government. They argued that a proper interpretation of this grant recognizes the national legislature's authority to use all recognized and common means to execute the powers granted to the government. They then took a broad view of those powers and argued that a bank was a commonly accepted tool by which several of them were implemented.

After a debate of great length, which was supported on both sides with ability, and with that ardour which was naturally excited by the importance attached by each party to the principle in contest, the question was put, and the bill was carried in the affirmative by a majority of nineteen voices.

After a long debate, skillfully supported by both sides, and fueled by the passion each group felt about the importance of the principle at stake, the question was called, and the bill passed with a majority of nineteen votes.

The opinions of the cabinet on the constitutionality of this last law.

The point which had been agitated with so much zeal in the house of representatives, was examined with equal deliberation by the executive. The cabinet was divided upon it. The secretary of state, and the attorney general, conceived that congress had clearly transcended their constitutional powers; while the secretary of the treasury, with equal clearness, maintained the opposite opinion. The advice of each minister, with his reasoning in support of it, was required in writing, and their arguments were considered by the President with all that attention which the magnitude of the question, and the interest taken in it by the opposing parties, so eminently required. This deliberate investigation of the subject terminated in a conviction, that the constitution of the United States authorized the measure;[52] and the sanction of the executive was given to the act.

The issue that had been passionately debated in the House of Representatives was examined with similar care by the executive branch. The cabinet was split on the matter. The Secretary of State and the Attorney General believed that Congress had clearly overstepped its constitutional powers, while the Secretary of the Treasury strongly disagreed. Each minister was asked to provide written advice along with their reasoning, and the President carefully considered their arguments, acknowledging the importance of the issue and the strong feelings from both sides. This thorough examination led to the conclusion that the Constitution of the United States permitted the action;[52] and the executive approved the act.

Progress of parties.

The judgment is so much influenced by the wishes, the affections, and the general theories of those by whom any political proposition is decided, that a contrariety of opinion on this great constitutional question ought to excite no surprise. It must be recollected that the conflict between the powers of the general and state governments was coeval with those governments. Even during the war, the preponderance of the states was obvious; and, in a very few years after peace, the struggle ended in the utter abasement of the general government. Many causes concurred to produce a constitution which was deemed more competent to the preservation of the union, but its adoption was opposed by great numbers; and in some of the large states especially, its enemies soon felt and manifested their superiority. The old line of division was still as strongly marked as ever. Many retained the opinion that liberty could be endangered only by encroachments upon the states; and that it was the great duty of patriotism to restrain the powers of the general government within the narrowest possible limits.

The judgment is heavily influenced by the desires, feelings, and general beliefs of those who decide on any political proposal, so differing opinions on this significant constitutional issue shouldn't come as a surprise. It's important to remember that the conflict between the powers of the federal and state governments has existed since those governments were established. Even during the war, the dominance of the states was clear; and just a few years after the war ended, the struggle resulted in the complete subjugation of the federal government. Several factors contributed to the creation of a constitution that was seen as more capable of maintaining the union, but its adoption faced considerable opposition; and in certain large states in particular, its opponents quickly showed their strength. The old divide remained as distinct as ever. Many still believed that liberty could only be threatened by encroachments on the states, and that it was the primary duty of patriotism to keep the powers of the federal government as limited as possible.

In the other party, which was also respectable for its numbers, many were found who had watched the progress of American affairs, and who sincerely believed that the real danger which threatened the republic was to be looked for in the undue ascendency of the states. To them it appeared, that the substantial powers, and the extensive means of influence, which were retained by the local sovereignties, furnished them with weapons for aggression which were not easily to be resisted, and that it behoved all those who were anxious for the happiness of their country, to guard the equilibrium established in the constitution, by preserving unimpaired, all the legitimate powers of the union. These were more confirmed in their sentiments, by observing the temper already discovered in the legislatures of several states, respecting the proceedings of congress.

In the other party, which was also notable for its numbers, many members had been following American affairs and genuinely believed that the real threat to the republic came from the excessive influence of the states. They thought that the significant powers and broad means of influence held by local governments gave them tools for aggression that were hard to resist, and that anyone who cared about the well-being of their country should protect the balance established in the constitution by safeguarding all the legitimate powers of the union. Their views were further confirmed by the attitudes already shown in the legislatures of several states regarding the actions of Congress.

To this great and radical division of opinion, which would necessarily affect every question on the authority of the national legislature, other motives were added, which were believed to possess considerable influence on all measures connected with the finances.

To this major and radical split in opinion, which would inevitably impact every issue regarding the authority of the national legislature, other reasons were added that were thought to have significant influence on all financial matters.

As an inevitable effect of the state of society, the public debt had greatly accumulated in the middle and northern states, whose inhabitants had derived, from its rapid appreciation, a proportional augmentation of their wealth. This circumstance could not fail to contribute to the complacency with which the plans of the secretary were viewed by those who had felt their benefit, nor to the irritation with which they were contemplated by others who had parted with their claims on the nation. It is not impossible, that personal considerations also mingled themselves with those which were merely political.

As a natural result of society's situation, the public debt had significantly increased in the middle and northern states, where residents had seen a proportional rise in their wealth due to its rapid appreciation. This situation certainly added to the satisfaction with which those who benefited viewed the secretary's plans, as well as the annoyance felt by others who had given up their claims on the nation. It's also possible that personal factors mixed in with those that were purely political.

With so many causes to bias the judgment, it would not have been wonderful if arguments less plausible than those advanced by either party had been deemed conclusive on its adversary; nor was it a matter of surprise that each should have denied to those which were urged in opposition, the weight to which they were certainly entitled. The liberal mind which can review them without prejudice, will charge neither the supporters nor the opponents of the bill with insincerity, nor with being knowingly actuated by motives which might not have been avowed.

With so many factors influencing judgment, it wouldn’t have been surprising if arguments less convincing than those presented by either side were considered definitive against the other; nor was it unexpected that each side denied the value that opposing arguments rightfully deserved. A fair-minded person who can evaluate them without bias will not accuse either the supporters or opponents of the bill of insincerity or of being driven by motives that they might not have openly stated.

This measure made a deep impression on many members of the legislature; and contributed, not inconsiderably, to the complete organization of those distinct and visible parties, which, in their long and dubious conflict for power, have since shaken the United States to their centre.

This action greatly impacted many lawmakers and significantly contributed to the full establishment of the distinct and visible political parties that, in their long and uncertain struggle for power, have since rocked the United States to its core.

Among the last acts of the present congress, was an act to augment the military establishment of the United States.

Among the final actions of the current Congress was a law to increase the military establishment of the United States.

War with the Indians.

The earnest endeavours of the President to give security to the north-western frontiers, by pacific arrangements, having been entirely unavailing, it became his duty to employ such other means as were placed in his hands, for the protection of the country. Confirmed by all his experience in the opinion that vigorous offensive operations alone could bring an Indian war to a happy conclusion, he had planned an expedition against the hostile tribes north-west of the Ohio, as soon as the impracticability of effecting a treaty with them had been ascertained.

The President's sincere efforts to secure the northwestern borders through peaceful arrangements had completely failed, so it became necessary for him to use other means available to protect the country. Based on all his experience, he believed that only strong offensive actions could lead to a successful end to the Indian war, so he planned an expedition against the hostile tribes north of the Ohio as soon as he realized that making a treaty with them was impossible.

General Harmar, a veteran of the revolution, who had received his appointment under the former government, was placed at the head of the federal troops. On the 30th of September, he marched from fort Washington with three hundred and twenty regulars. The whole army when joined by the militia of Pennsylvania and Kentucky amounted to fourteen hundred and fifty-three men. About the middle of October, Colonel Harden, who commanded the Kentucky militia, and who had been also a continental officer of considerable merit, was detached at the head of six hundred men, chiefly militia, to reconnoitre the ground, and to ascertain the intentions of the enemy. On his approach, the Indians set fire to their principal village, and fled with precipitation to the woods. As the object of the expedition would be only half accomplished, unless the savages could be brought to action and defeated, Colonel Harden was again detached at the head of two hundred and ten men, thirty of whom were regulars. About ten miles west of Chilicothe, where the main body of the army lay, he was attacked by a party of Indians. The Pennsylvanians, who composed his left column, had previously fallen in the rear; and the Kentuckians, disregarding the exertions of their colonel, and of a few other officers, fled on the first appearance of an enemy. The small corps of regulars commanded by Lieutenant Armstrong made a brave resistance. After twenty-three of them had fallen in the field, the surviving seven made their escape and rejoined the army.

General Harmar, a veteran of the revolution who got his appointment under the previous government, was put in charge of the federal troops. On September 30th, he marched from Fort Washington with three hundred and twenty regular soldiers. When joined by the militia from Pennsylvania and Kentucky, the entire army totaled fourteen hundred and fifty-three men. In mid-October, Colonel Harden, who led the Kentucky militia and was also a continental officer of considerable merit, was sent out with six hundred men, mostly militia, to scout the area and determine the enemy's intentions. As he approached, the Indians set fire to their main village and quickly fled into the woods. Since the mission would only be half complete unless the natives could be engaged and defeated, Colonel Harden was sent out again with two hundred and ten men, thirty of whom were regulars. About ten miles west of Chillicothe, where the main army was stationed, he was attacked by a group of Indians. The Pennsylvanians, who made up his left flank, had previously fallen behind, and the Kentuckians, ignoring their colonel's orders and those of a few other officers, fled at the first sight of the enemy. The small unit of regulars led by Lieutenant Armstrong put up a brave fight. After twenty-three of them had fallen in battle, the remaining seven managed to escape and rejoined the army.

Defeat of Harmar.

Notwithstanding this check, the remaining towns on the Scioto were reduced to ashes, and the provisions laid up for the winter were entirely destroyed. This service being accomplished, the army commenced its march towards fort Washington. Being desirous of wiping off the disgrace which his arms had sustained, General Harmar halted about eight miles from Chilicothe, and once more detached Colonel Harden with orders to find the enemy and bring on an engagement. His command consisted of three hundred and sixty men, of whom sixty were regulars commanded by Major Wyllys. Early the next morning, this detachment reached the confluence of the St. Joseph and St. Mary, where it was divided into three columns. The left division, commanded by Colonel Harden in person, crossed the St. Joseph, and proceeded up its western bank. The centre, consisting of the federal troops, was led by Major Wyllys up the eastern side of that river; and the right, under the command of Major M'Millan, marched along a range of heights which commanded the right flank of the centre division. The columns had proceeded but a short distance, when each was met by a considerable body of Indians, and a severe engagement ensued. The militia retrieved their reputation, and several of their bravest officers fell. The heights on the right having been, from some cause not mentioned, unoccupied by the American troops, the savages seized them early in the action, and attacked the right flank of the centre with great fury. Although Major Wyllys was among the first who fell, the battle was maintained by the regulars with spirit, and considerable execution was done on both sides. At length, the scanty remnant of this small band, quite overpowered by numbers, was driven off the ground, leaving fifty of their comrades, exclusive of Major Wyllys and Lieutenant Farthingham, dead upon the field. The loss sustained by the militia was also considerable. It amounted to upwards of one hundred men, among whom were nine officers. After an engagement of extreme severity, the detachment joined the main army, which continued its march to fort Washington.

Despite this setback, the remaining towns along the Scioto were burned to the ground, and the supplies stored for winter were completely destroyed. With this task complete, the army began its march toward Fort Washington. Eager to overcome the shame his forces had suffered, General Harmar stopped about eight miles from Chillicothe and sent Colonel Harden out again with orders to find the enemy and initiate a battle. His command included three hundred sixty men, with sixty regulars led by Major Wyllys. Early the next morning, this unit arrived at the meeting point of the St. Joseph and St. Mary rivers, where it split into three groups. The left division, led by Colonel Harden himself, crossed the St. Joseph and advanced up its western bank. The center, made up of federal troops, was guided by Major Wyllys along the eastern side of the river; the right, under Major M'Millan, marched along a ridge that overlooked the center's right flank. The groups had only gone a short way when each was confronted by a significant force of Indians, and a fierce battle broke out. The militia restored their reputation, though several of their bravest officers were killed. For some unknown reason, the heights on the right were left vacant by American troops, allowing the savages to take them early in the fight and launch a fierce attack on the center's right flank. Although Major Wyllys was one of the first to fall, the regulars fought back with determination, inflicting considerable damage on both sides. Eventually, the small remaining group, overwhelmed by numbers, was forced to retreat, leaving fifty of their comrades behind, not including Major Wyllys and Lieutenant Farthingham, who were also dead on the field. The militia also suffered significant losses, totaling over a hundred men, including nine officers. After a fiercely contested battle, the detachment rejoined the main army, which continued on to Fort Washington.

General Harmar, with what propriety it is not easy to discern, claimed the victory. He conceived, not entirely without reason, that the loss of a considerable number of men, would be fatal to the Indians, although a still greater loss should be sustained by the Americans, because the savages did not possess a population from which they could replace the warriors who had fallen. The event, however, did not justify this opinion.

General Harmar, with a questionable sense of propriety, claimed victory. He believed, not without some reason, that losing a significant number of men would be disastrous for the Indians, even though the Americans would suffer even more losses. This was because the Native Americans didn't have a population to replace the warriors they had lost. However, the outcome did not support this view.

The information respecting this expedition was quickly followed by intelligence stating the deplorable condition of the frontiers. An address from the representatives of all the counties of Kentucky, and those of Virginia bordering on the Ohio, was presented to the President, praying that the defence of the country might be committed to militia unmixed with regulars, and that they might immediately be drawn out to oppose "the exulting foe." To this address, the President gave a conciliatory answer, but he understood too well the nature of the service, to yield to the request it contained. Such were his communications to the legislature, that a regiment was added to the permanent military establishment, and he was authorized to raise a body of two thousand men, for six months, and to appoint a major general, and a brigadier general, to continue in command so long as he should think their services necessary.

The news about this expedition was soon followed by reports on the terrible state of the frontiers. An address from representatives of all the counties in Kentucky and those in Virginia near the Ohio River was presented to the President, asking that the defense of the country be entrusted to militia without regular troops, and that they be called up right away to face "the triumphant enemy." In response to this address, the President gave a polite answer, but he understood the demands of the situation too well to agree to their request. His communications to the legislature led to an additional regiment being added to the permanent military force, and he was authorized to recruit two thousand men for six months, and to appoint a major general and a brigadier general to remain in command for as long as he thought their services were needed.

Adjournment of congress.

With the 3d of March, 1791, terminated the first congress elected under the constitution of the United States. The party denominated federal having prevailed at the elections, a majority of the members were steadfast friends of the constitution, and were sincerely desirous of supporting a system they had themselves introduced, and on the preservation of which, in full health and vigour, they firmly believed the happiness of their fellow citizens, and the respectability of the nation, greatly to depend. To organize a government, to retrieve the national character, to establish a system of revenue, and to create public credit, were among the arduous duties which were imposed upon them by the political situation of their country. With persevering labour, guided by no inconsiderable portion of virtue and intelligence, these objects were, in a great degree, accomplished. Out of the measures proposed for their attainment, questions alike intricate and interesting unavoidably arose. It is not in the nature of man to discuss such questions without strongly agitating the passions, and exciting irritations which do not readily subside. Had it even been the happy and singular lot of America to see its national legislature assemble uninfluenced by those prejudices which grew out of the previous divisions of the country, the many delicate points which they were under the necessity of deciding, could not have failed to disturb this enviable state of harmony, and to mingle some share of party spirit with their deliberations. But when the actual state of the public mind was contemplated, and due weight was given to the important consideration that, at no very distant day, a successor to the present chief magistrate must be elected, it was still less to be hoped that the first congress could pass away, without producing strong and permanent dispositions in parties, to impute to each other designs unfriendly to the public happiness. As yet, however, these imputations did not extend to the President. His character was held sacred, and the purity of his motives was admitted by all. Some divisions were understood to have found their way into the cabinet. It was insinuated that between the secretaries of state and of the treasury, very serious differences had arisen; but these high personages were believed, to be equally attached to the President, who was not suspected of undue partiality to either. If his assent to the bill for incorporating the national bank produced discontent, the opponents of that measure seemed disposed to ascribe his conduct, in that instance, to his judgment, rather than to any prepossession in favour of the party by whom it was carried. The opposition, therefore, in congress, to the measures of the government, seemed to be levelled at the secretary of the treasury, and at the northern members by whom those measures were generally supported, not at the President by whom they were approved. By taking this direction, it made its way into the public mind, without being encountered by that devoted affection which a great majority of the people felt for the chief magistrate of the union. In the mean time, the national prosperity was in a state of rapid progress; and the government was gaining, though slowly, in the public opinion. But in several of the state assemblies, especially in the southern division of the continent, serious evidences of dissatisfaction were exhibited, which demonstrated the jealousy with which the local sovereignties contemplated the powers exercised by the federal legislature.

With the 3rd of March, 1791, the first Congress elected under the Constitution of the United States came to an end. The Federalist Party won the elections, and most of the members were strong supporters of the Constitution, genuinely wanting to uphold a system they had introduced and believed was essential to the happiness of their fellow citizens and the nation's respectability. Their job was to organize a government, restore the nation's reputation, establish a revenue system, and create public credit, all of which were challenging tasks given the political situation of their country. Through persistent effort, guided by considerable virtue and intelligence, they largely succeeded in these goals. However, from the measures proposed to achieve these goals, complex and engaging questions inevitably arose. It's in human nature to discuss such matters with strong emotions, leading to friction that doesn't easily settle. Even if America had been lucky enough to have its national legislature meet free from biases stemming from previous divisions, the sensitive issues they had to decide on would still have disrupted this desirable state of harmony and introduced some party spirit into their discussions. But when considering the public mindset and the significant issue that a successor to the current president would need to be elected soon, it was even less likely that the first Congress could conclude without creating strong and lasting party sentiments, with accusations of unfriendliness towards the public's welfare. However, these accusations did not yet extend to the President. His character was considered sacred, and everyone accepted the purity of his motives. Some divisions were thought to have appeared in the Cabinet. It was suggested that serious disagreements had occurred between the Secretaries of State and Treasury, but it was believed these high-ranking officials were both strongly loyal to the President, who was not suspected of favoring either. Even if his approval of the national bank bill caused some discontent, critics of that measure seemed inclined to attribute his actions to his judgment rather than any bias towards the party that supported it. Therefore, the opposition in Congress to the government’s policies seemed aimed at the Secretary of the Treasury and the Northern members who generally backed those policies, rather than at the President who signed off on them. Taking this approach allowed it to take hold in public opinion without facing the devoted affection a large majority of the people felt for the President. Meanwhile, national prosperity was rapidly advancing, and the government, although slowly, was improving its public image. However, in several state assemblies, especially in the southern part of the continent, serious signs of dissatisfaction emerged, showing the anxiety local authorities felt about the powers exercised by the federal legislature.


CHAPTER VII.

General St. Clair appointed Commander-in-chief.... The President makes a tour through the southern states.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Debate on the bill for apportioning representatives.... Militia law.... Defeat of St. Clair.... Opposition to the increase of the army.... Report of the Secretary of the Treasury for raising additional supplies.... Congress adjourns.... Strictures on the conduct of administration, with a view of parties.... Disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury.... Letters from General Washington.... Opposition to the excise law.... President's proclamation.... Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo.... General Wayne appointed to the command of the army.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Resolutions implicating the Secretary of the Treasury rejected.... Congress adjourns.... Progress of the French revolution, and its effects on parties in the United States.

General St. Clair was appointed Commander-in-Chief.... The President is touring the southern states.... Congress meets.... The President delivers a speech.... There's a debate on the bill to apportion representatives.... Militia law.... St. Clair suffers a defeat.... There's opposition to increasing the army.... The Secretary of the Treasury reports on raising additional funds.... Congress adjourns.... Criticism of the administration's actions, reflecting party divides.... Disagreement between the Secretaries of State and Treasury.... Letters from General Washington.... Opposition to the excise tax.... The President's proclamation.... Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo.... General Wayne is appointed to lead the army.... Congress meets.... The President's speech.... Resolutions implicating the Secretary of the Treasury are rejected.... Congress adjourns.... Developments in the French Revolution and its impact on political factions in the United States.

 

1791

More ample means for the protection of the frontiers having been placed in the hands of the executive, the immediate attention of the President was directed to this interesting object.

More resources for protecting the borders have been given to the executive, so the President immediately focused on this important issue.

General St. Clair appointed commander-in-chief of the army.

Major General Arthur St. Clair, governor of the territory north-west of the Ohio, was appointed Commander-in-chief of the forces to be employed in the meditated expedition. This gentleman had served through the war of the revolution with reputation, though it had never been his fortune to distinguish himself. The evacuation of Ticonderoga had indeed, at one time, subjected him to much public censure; but it was found, upon inquiry, to be unmerited. Other motives, in addition to the persuasion of his fitness for the service, conduced to his appointment. With the sword, the olive branch was still to be tendered; and it was thought adviseable to place them in the same hands. The governor, having been made officially the negotiator with the tribes inhabiting the territories over which he presided, being a military man, acquainted with the country into which the war was to be carried, possessing considerable influence with the inhabitants of the frontiers, and being so placed as to superintend the preparations for the expedition advantageously, seemed to have claims to the station which were not to be overlooked. It was also a consideration of some importance, that the high rank he had held in the American army, would obviate those difficulties in filling the inferior grades with men of experience, which might certainly be expected, should a person who had acted in a less elevated station, be selected for the chief command.

Major General Arthur St. Clair, governor of the territory northwest of the Ohio, was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the forces for the planned expedition. This man had served throughout the Revolutionary War with a good reputation, although he never had the chance to act heroically. The evacuation of Ticonderoga had at one point subjected him to significant public criticism, but it was later found to be unfounded. Besides being seen as suitable for the role, other reasons contributed to his appointment. Along with military strength, a diplomatic approach was still needed, so it was considered wise to put both in the same person's hands. The governor was officially designated as the negotiator with the tribes in the territories he oversaw; being a military man familiar with the war zone, having considerable influence with the frontier residents, and being positioned to effectively manage the expedition’s preparations made him a compelling candidate for the role. It was also important to note that his high rank in the American army would help avoid problems in filling lower positions with experienced personnel, which might arise if someone with a lower rank was chosen for the top command.

 

Tomb of Mary, Mother of Washington

Tomb of Mary, Mother of Washington

This is the original monument as it appeared before the present granite obelisk was erected over the grave of George Washington's mother in Fredericksburg, Virginia. It was in Fredericksburg that she made her home during her declining years, and it was on the Kenmore estate of her daughter, Elizabeth, and son-in-law, Fielding Lewis, that she was buried, September, 1789, having survived her husband, Augustine Washington, forty-six years.

This is the original monument as it looked before the current granite obelisk was put up over the grave of George Washington's mother in Fredericksburg, Virginia. She lived in Fredericksburg during her later years, and she was buried on the Kenmore estate of her daughter, Elizabeth, and son-in-law, Fielding Lewis, in September 1789, having outlived her husband, Augustine Washington, by forty-six years.

 

The president makes a tour through the southern states.

After making the necessary arrangements for recruiting the army, the President prepared to make his long contemplated tour through the southern states.[53] In passing through them, he was received universally with the same marks of affectionate attachment, which he had experienced in the northern and central parts of the union. To the sensibilities which these demonstrations of the regard and esteem of good men could not fail to inspire, was added the high gratification produced by observing the rapid improvements of the country, and the advances made by the government, in acquiring the confidence of the people. The numerous letters written by him after his return to Philadelphia, attest the agreeable impressions made by these causes. "In my late tour through the southern states," said he, in a letter of the 28th of July, to Mr. Gouverneur Morris, "I experienced great satisfaction in seeing the good effects of the general government in that part of the union. The people at large have felt the security which it gives, and the equal justice which it administers to them. The farmer, the merchant, and the mechanic, have seen their several interests attended to, and from thence they unite in placing a confidence in their representatives, as well as in those in whose hands the execution of the laws is placed. Industry has there taken place of idleness, and economy of dissipation. Two or three years of good crops, and a ready market for the produce of their lands, have put every one in good humour; and, in some instances, they even impute to the government what is due only to the goodness of Providence.

After making the necessary arrangements to recruit the army, the President got ready for his long-planned tour through the southern states.[53] During his journey, he was warmly welcomed just like he had been in the northern and central parts of the union. The heartfelt affection and respect from good people stirred up his emotions, and he also felt a deep satisfaction from seeing the rapid improvements in the country and the government's growing trust among the people. The many letters he wrote after returning to Philadelphia reflect the positive impressions these experiences made on him. "In my recent tour through the southern states," he wrote on July 28 to Mr. Gouverneur Morris, "I was really pleased to witness the good impacts of the federal government in that part of the union. The people have felt the security it provides and the fair justice it administers. Farmers, merchants, and craftsmen have seen their interests being addressed, which leads them to have confidence in their representatives and those who enforce the laws. Hard work has replaced idleness, and wise spending has taken the place of waste. A few years of good harvests and a strong market for their crops have lifted everyone’s spirits, and in some cases, they even credit the government for what is really due to the goodness of Providence."

"The establishment of public credit is an immense point gained in our national concerns. This, I believe, exceeds the expectation of the most sanguine among us; and a late instance, unparalleled in this country, has been given of the confidence reposed in our measures, by the rapidity with which the subscriptions to the bank of the United States were filled. In two hours after the books were opened by the commissioners, the whole number of shares was taken up, and four thousand more applied for than were allowed by the institution. This circumstance was not only pleasing as it related to the confidence in government, but also as it exhibited an unexpected proof of the resources of our citizens."

"The establishment of public credit is a huge milestone for our country. I believe this surpasses the hopes of even the most optimistic among us. A recent event, unprecedented in this country, showed the trust placed in our actions, demonstrated by how quickly subscriptions to the Bank of the United States were filled. Just two hours after the commissioners opened the books, all available shares were taken, and there were four thousand more requests than the institution could accommodate. This was not only encouraging in terms of confidence in the government, but it also provided an unexpected testament to the resources of our citizens."

This visit had undoubtedly some tendency to produce the good disposition which the President observed with so much pleasure. The affections are perhaps more intimately connected with the judgment than we are disposed to admit; and the appearance of the chief magistrate of the union, who was the object of general love and reverence, could not be without its influence in conciliating the minds of many to the government he administered, and to its measures. But this progress towards conciliation was, perhaps, less considerable than was indicated by appearances. The hostility to the government, which was coeval with its existence, though diminished, was far from being subdued; and under this smooth exterior was concealed a mass of discontent, which, though it did not obtrude itself on the view of the man who united almost all hearts, was active in its exertions to effect its objects.

This visit definitely helped create the positive feelings that the President noticed with great satisfaction. Emotions are probably more closely linked to our judgment than we like to admit, and the presence of the nation's leader, someone widely loved and respected, surely had an impact on winning over many people's support for his administration and its policies. However, this move toward reconciliation was likely not as significant as it seemed. The opposition to the government, which had existed since its founding, was still present, even if it had lessened; beneath this calm surface was a significant amount of discontent that, while not apparent to the man who had won almost everyone’s affection, was actively working to achieve its goals.

The difficulties which must impede the recruiting service in a country where coercion is not employed, and where the common wages of labour greatly exceed the pay of a soldier, protracted the completion of the regiments to a late season of the year; but the summer was not permitted to waste in total inaction.

The challenges that hinder the recruitment process in a country where force isn't used, and where regular wages are much higher than a soldier's pay, delayed the formation of the regiments until late in the year; however, the summer was not allowed to go by without any activity.

The act passed at the last session for the defence of the frontiers, in addition to its other provisions, had given to the President an unlimited power to call mounted militia into the field. Under this authority, two expeditions had been conducted against the villages on the Wabash, in which a few of the Indian warriors were killed, some of their old men, women, and children, were made prisoners, and several of their towns and fields of corn were destroyed. The first was led by General Scott, in May, and the second by General Wilkinson, in September. These desultory incursions had not much influence on the war.

The law passed at the last session to protect the borders, along with its other provisions, gave the President unlimited power to call in mounted militia. Using this authority, two missions were carried out against the villages on the Wabash, resulting in the deaths of a few Indian warriors, the capture of some elderly men, women, and children, and the destruction of several towns and cornfields. The first mission was led by General Scott in May, and the second by General Wilkinson in September. These sporadic attacks didn’t have much impact on the war.

It was believed in the United States, that the hostility of the Indians was kept up by the traders living in their villages. These persons had, generally, resided in the United States; and, having been compelled to leave the country in consequence of the part they had taken during the war of the revolution, felt the resentments which banishment and confiscation seldom fail to inspire. Their enmities were ascribed by many, perhaps unjustly, to the temper of the government in Canada; but some countenance seemed to be given to this opinion by intelligence that, about the commencement of the preceding campaign, large supplies of ammunition had been delivered from the British posts on the lakes, to the Indians at war with the United States. While the President was on his southern tour, he addressed a letter to the secretary of state, to be communicated to Colonel Beckwith, who still remained in Philadelphia as the informal representative of his nation, in which he expressed his surprise and disappointment at this interference, by the servants or subjects of a foreign state, in a war prosecuted by the United States for the sole purpose of procuring peace and safety for the inhabitants of their frontiers.

It was believed in the United States that the hostility of the Native Americans was encouraged by the traders living in their villages. These traders had mostly lived in the United States and, after being forced to leave due to their involvement in the Revolutionary War, felt the bitterness that exile and loss of property often bring. Many people, perhaps unfairly, attributed their hostility to the attitude of the Canadian government; however, some support for this view came from reports that, around the start of the previous campaign, large supplies of ammunition had been sent from British posts on the lakes to the Native Americans fighting against the United States. While the President was on his southern tour, he sent a letter to the Secretary of State to be shared with Colonel Beckwith, who was still in Philadelphia as the informal representative of his nation. In the letter, he expressed his surprise and disappointment at this interference by the agents of a foreign state in a war that the United States was fighting solely to achieve peace and safety for the people on their frontiers.

On receiving this communication, Colonel Beckwith expressed his disbelief that the supplies mentioned had been delivered; but on being assured of the fact, he avowed the opinion that the transaction was without the knowledge of Lord Dorchester, to whom he said he should communicate, without delay, the ideas of the American government on the subject.

On receiving this message, Colonel Beckwith expressed his disbelief that the supplies mentioned had been delivered; but when he was assured it was true, he stated that he believed the transaction took place without Lord Dorchester's knowledge, and that he would inform him right away about the American government's views on the matter.

Meeting of congress.
President's speech.

On the 24th of October the second congress assembled in Philadelphia. In his speech at the opening of the session, the President expressed his great satisfaction at the prosperous situation of the country, and particularly mentioned the rapidity with which the shares in the bank of the United States were subscribed, as "among the striking and pleasing evidences which presented themselves, not only of confidence in the government, but of resources in the community."

On October 24th, the second congress met in Philadelphia. In his opening speech, the President shared his happiness about the country's thriving situation and specifically highlighted how quickly the shares in the Bank of the United States were taken, calling it "one of the striking and encouraging signs of not just confidence in the government, but also the resources in the community."

Adverting to the measures which had been taken in execution of the laws and resolutions of the last session, "the most important of which," he observed, "respected the defence and security of the western frontiers," he had, he said, "negotiated provisional treaties, and used other proper means to attach the wavering, and to confirm in their friendship the well disposed tribes of Indians. The means which he had adopted for a pacification with those of a hostile description having proved unsuccessful, offensive operations had been directed, some of which had proved completely successful, and others were still pending. Overtures of peace were still continued to the deluded tribes; and it was sincerely to be desired that all need of coercion might cease, and that an intimate intercourse might succeed, calculated to advance the happiness of the Indians, and to attach them firmly to the United States."

Referring to the actions taken to enforce the laws and decisions from the last session, "the most significant of which," he noted, "concerned the defense and security of the western frontiers," he mentioned that he had "negotiated temporary treaties and used other appropriate methods to win over those who were uncertain and to strengthen the friendship with the supportive tribes of Indians. The approaches he had taken to achieve peace with those who were hostile had not been successful, so offensive operations were initiated, some of which were completely successful while others were still ongoing. Efforts to negotiate peace continued with the misled tribes; and it was genuinely hoped that all need for coercion would end, allowing for a close relationship that would promote the well-being of the Indians and firmly bond them to the United States."

In marking the line of conduct which ought to be maintained for the promotion of this object, he strongly recommended "justice to the savages, and such rational experiments for imparting to them the blessings of civilization, as might from time to time suit their condition;" and then concluded this subject with saying—"A system corresponding with the mild principles of religion and philanthropy towards an unenlightened race of men whose happiness materially depends on the conduct of the United States, would be as honourable to the national character, as conformable to the dictates of sound policy."

In outlining the approach that should be taken to promote this goal, he strongly recommended "justice to the indigenous people, and reasonable efforts to provide them with the advantages of civilization, as their circumstances allow;" and then wrapped up this topic by saying—"A system that aligns with the compassionate principles of religion and philanthropy towards an uneducated group of people whose well-being largely relies on the actions of the United States would be as honorable to our national character as it would be sensible in terms of policy."

After stating that measures had been taken for carrying into execution the act laying duties on distilled spirits, he added—"The impressions with which this law has been received by the community have been, upon the whole, such as were to have been expected among enlightened and well disposed citizens, from the propriety and necessity of the measure. The novelty, however, of the tax, in a considerable part of the United States, and a misconception of some of its provisions, have given occasion, in particular places, to some degree of discontent. But it is satisfactory to know that this disposition yields to proper explanations, and more just apprehensions of the true nature of the law. And I entertain a full confidence that it will, in all, give way to motives which arise out of a just sense of duty, and a virtuous regard to the public welfare.

After saying that steps had been taken to implement the law imposing taxes on distilled spirits, he added—"The way this law has been received by the public has mostly been what you would expect from informed and well-meaning citizens, given the reasonableness and necessity of the measure. However, the newness of the tax in many parts of the United States and some misunderstandings about its provisions have led to some discontent in certain areas. It’s reassuring to know that this discontent can be alleviated through proper explanations and a better understanding of the law's true nature. I am fully confident that, ultimately, concerns will give way to motivations stemming from a genuine sense of duty and a virtuous commitment to the public good."

"If there are any circumstances in the law, which, consistently with its main design may be so varied as to remove any well intentioned objections that may happen to exist, it will comport with a wise moderation to make the proper variations. It is desirable on all occasions, to unite with a steady and firm adherence to constitutional and necessary acts of government, the fullest evidence of a disposition, as far as may be practicable, to consult the wishes of every part of the community, and to lay the foundations of the public administration in the affections of the people."

"If there are any situations in the law that can be adjusted without losing its main purpose, it makes sense to make those adjustments. It’s important to always balance a strong and unwavering commitment to constitutional and necessary government actions with clear evidence of a willingness, as much as possible, to consider the desires of all parts of the community and to build the foundation of public administration based on the people's support."

The answers of the two houses noticed, briefly and generally, the various topics of the speech; and, though perhaps less warm than those of the preceding congress, manifested great respect for the executive magistrate, and an undiminished confidence in his patriotic exertions to promote the public interests.

The responses from both houses noted, in a brief and general manner, the different topics of the speech; and while they may have been somewhat less enthusiastic than those from the previous congress, they showed significant respect for the president and continued confidence in his dedication to serving the public good.

Debate on the bill "for apportioning representatives among the people of the states according to the first enumeration."

Among the first subjects of importance which engaged the attention of the legislature, was a bill "for apportioning representatives among the people of the several states according to the first enumeration." The constitution, in its original form, had affixed no other limits to the power of congress over the numbers of which the house of representatives might consist, than that there should not be more than one member for every thirty thousand persons; but that each state should be entitled to at least one. Independent of the general considerations in favour of a more or less numerous representation in the popular branch of the legislature, there was one of a local nature, whose operation, though secret, was extensive, which gave to this question a peculiar interest. To whatever number of persons a representative might be allotted, there would still remain a fraction, which would be greater or less in each state, according to the ratio which congress should adopt between representation and population. The relative power of states, in one branch of the legislature, would consequently be affected by this ratio; and to questions of that description, few members can permit themselves to be inattentive.

Among the first important topics that caught the attention of the legislature was a bill "for apportioning representatives among the people of the various states based on the first census." The constitution, in its original form, placed no other limits on Congress’s authority regarding the number of members in the House of Representatives, other than that there should not be more than one member for every thirty thousand people; but each state should have at least one representative. Aside from the general arguments for having more or fewer representatives in the popular branch of the legislature, there was a local factor at play, which, although not obvious, had a widespread impact, giving this issue a unique significance. No matter how many people a representative might represent, there would always be a leftover fraction that varied in each state, depending on the ratio Congress chose between representation and population. Consequently, the relative power of states in one branch of the legislature would be influenced by this ratio, and members typically cannot afford to ignore such questions.

This bill, as originally introduced into the house of representatives, gave to each state one member for every thirty thousand persons. On a motion to strike out the number thirty thousand, the debate turned chiefly on the policy and advantage of a more or less numerous house of representatives; but with the general arguments suggested by the subject, strong and pointed allusions to the measures of the preceding congress were interspersed, which indicated much more serious hostility to the administration than had hitherto been expressed. Speaking of the corruption which he supposed to exist in the British house of commons, Mr. Giles said that causes essentially different from their numbers, had produced this effect. "Among these, were the frequent mortgages of the funds, and the immense appropriations at the disposal of the executive."

This bill, as it was first introduced in the House of Representatives, assigned one representative to each state for every thirty thousand people. When a motion was made to remove the figure of thirty thousand, the discussion mainly focused on the benefits and drawbacks of having a larger or smaller House of Representatives. However, alongside the general points raised by the topic, there were strong and direct references to the actions of the previous Congress, indicating a much deeper opposition to the administration than had been expressed before. Regarding the corruption he believed was present in the British House of Commons, Mr. Giles noted that factors other than their numbers had led to this situation. "Among these were the frequent mortgages of the funds and the huge appropriations under the executive's control."

"An inequality of circumstances," he observed, "produces revolutions in governments, from democracy, to aristocracy, and monarchy. Great wealth produces a desire of distinctions, rank, and titles. The revolutions of property, in this country, have created a prodigious inequality of circumstances. Government has contributed to this inequality. The bank of the United States is a most important machine in promoting the objects of this monied interest. This bank will be the most powerful engine to corrupt this house. Some of the members are directors of this institution; and it will only be by increasing the representation, that an adequate barrier can be opposed to this monied interest." He next adverted to certain ideas, which, he said, had been disseminated through the United States. "The legislature," he took occasion to observe, "ought to express some disapprobation of these opinions. The strong executive of this government," he added, "ought to be balanced by a full representation in this house."

"An inequality of circumstances," he noted, "leads to revolutions in governments, shifting from democracy to aristocracy and monarchy. Great wealth creates a desire for distinctions, status, and titles. The shifts in property ownership in this country have resulted in a huge inequality of circumstances. The government has played a role in this inequality. The Bank of the United States is a key player in advancing the interests of wealthy individuals. This bank will be a powerful tool for corrupting this institution. Some members are directors of this bank, and only by expanding representation can we create an effective barrier against this wealthy influence." He then mentioned certain ideas that he claimed had been spread throughout the United States. "The legislature," he pointed out, "should express some disapproval of these views. The strong executive of this government," he added, "should be counterbalanced by full representation in this institution."

Similar sentiments were advanced by Mr. Findley.

Similar feelings were expressed by Mr. Findley.

After a long and animated discussion, the amendment was lost, and the bill passed in its original form.

After a long and lively discussion, the amendment was rejected, and the bill passed in its original form.

In the senate, it was amended by changing the ratio, so as to give one representative for every thirty-three thousand persons in each state; but this amendment was disagreed to by the house of representatives; and each house adhering to its opinion, the bill fell; but was again introduced into the house of representatives, under a different title, and in a new form, though without any change in its substantial provisions. After a debate in which the injustice of the fractions produced by the ratio it adopted was strongly pressed, it passed that house. In the senate, it was again amended, not by reducing, but by enlarging the number of representatives.

In the Senate, the bill was revised to change the ratio to one representative for every thirty-three thousand people in each state. However, the House of Representatives rejected this amendment. With each chamber sticking to its position, the bill ultimately failed. It was then reintroduced in the House of Representatives under a different title and in a new format, but with no substantial changes. After a debate that highlighted the unfairness of the fractions caused by the adopted ratio, it passed the House. In the Senate, it was amended again, this time not by reducing but by increasing the number of representatives.

The constitution of the United States declares that "representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union according to their respective numbers;" and that "the number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand, but each state shall have at least one representative." Construing the constitution to authorize a process by which the whole number of representatives should be ascertained on the whole population of the United States, and afterwards "apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers," the senate applied the number thirty thousand as a divisor to the total population, and taking the quotient, which was one hundred and twenty, as the number of representatives given by the ratio which had been adopted in the house where the bill had originated, they apportioned that number among the several states by that ratio, until as many representatives as it would give were allotted to each. The residuary members were then distributed among the states having the highest fractions. Without professing the principle on which this apportionment was made, the amendment of the senate merely allotted to the states respectively, the number of members which the process just mentioned would give. The result was a more equitable apportionment of representatives to population, and had the rule of construing that instrument been correct, the amendment removed objections which were certainly well founded. But the rule was novel, and overturned opinions which had been generally assumed, and were supposed to be settled. In one branch of the legislature it had already been rejected; and in the other, the majority in its favour was only one.

The Constitution of the United States states that "representatives and direct taxes shall be divided among the various states included in this union based on their respective populations;" and that "the number of representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty thousand people, but each state shall have at least one representative." By interpreting the Constitution to allow for determining the total number of representatives based on the entire population of the United States, and then "dividing that number among the various states according to their respective populations," the Senate used thirty thousand as a divisor for the total population. They took the quotient, which was one hundred twenty, as the number of representatives based on the ratio used in the House where the bill originated. They distributed that number among the states based on the same ratio until as many representatives as possible were assigned to each state. The remaining representatives were then allocated to states with the highest fractions. Without stating the principle governing this apportionment, the Senate's amendment simply assigned to the states the number of members that the above process would yield. This led to a more equitable distribution of representatives relative to the population, and if the interpretation of that document had been correct, the amendment resolved valid concerns. However, the rule was new and challenged assumptions that had been widely accepted and considered settled. One branch of the legislature had already dismissed it, and in the other, the majority in favor was just one.

In the house of representatives, the amendment was supported with considerable ingenuity.

In the House of Representatives, the amendment was backed with a lot of creativity.

After an earnest debate, however, it was disagreed to, and a conference took place without producing an accommodation among the members composing the committee. But finally, the house of representatives receded from their disagreement; and, by a majority of two voices, the bill passed as amended in the senate.

After a serious discussion, however, it was decided against, and a meeting happened without reaching an agreement among the committee members. But eventually, the House of Representatives backed down from their disagreement; and, by a majority of two votes, the bill passed with the amendments made in the Senate.

On the President, the solemn duty of deciding, whether an act of the legislature consisted with the constitution; for the bill, if constitutional, was unexceptionable.

On the President rests the serious responsibility of determining whether a legislative act aligns with the constitution; because if the bill is constitutional, it's beyond reproach.

In his cabinet, also, a difference of opinion is understood to have existed; the secretary of state and the attorney general were of opinion that the act was at variance with the constitution; the secretary of war was rather undecided; and the secretary of the treasury, thinking that, from the vagueness of expression in the clause relating to the subject, neither construction could be absolutely rejected, was in favour of acceding to the interpretation given by the legislature.

In his cabinet, there was also a difference of opinion. The secretary of state and the attorney general believed that the act was inconsistent with the constitution. The secretary of war was somewhat uncertain, while the secretary of the treasury, feeling that the wording in the clause on the matter was vague, thought that neither interpretation could be completely ruled out and supported going along with the legislature's interpretation.

After weighing the arguments which were urged on each side of the question, the President was confirmed in the opinion that the population of each state, and not the total population of the United States, must give the numbers to which alone the process by which the number of representatives was to be ascertained could be applied. Having formed this opinion, to a correct and independent mind the course to be pursued was a plain one. Duty required the exercise of a power which a President of the United States will always find much difficulty in employing; and he returned the bill to the house in which it originated, accompanied with his objections[54] to it. In observance of the forms prescribed in the constitution, the question was then taken on its passage by ayes and noes, and it was rejected. A third bill was soon afterwards introduced, apportioning the representatives on the several states at a ratio of one for every thirty-three thousand persons in each state, which passed into a law. Thus was this interesting part of the American constitution finally settled.

After considering the arguments from both sides of the issue, the President concluded that the population of each state, not the overall population of the United States, should determine the numbers to which the method for calculating the number of representatives would apply. Having reached this conclusion, a clear course of action emerged for a logical and independent thinker. The President recognized the duty to use a power that can often be challenging for a President of the United States to exercise, and he sent the bill back to the originating house with his objections[54]. Following the procedures outlined in the Constitution, the question was then put to a vote by ayes and noes, and it was rejected. A third bill was soon introduced, which allocated representatives among the states at a ratio of one for every thirty-three thousand people in each state, and this bill became law. Thus, this important aspect of the American Constitution was ultimately resolved.

Militia law.

During this session of congress, an act passed for establishing a uniform militia.

During this session of Congress, a law was passed to create a uniform militia.

The President had manifested, from the commencement of his administration, a peculiar degree of solicitude on this subject, and had repeatedly urged it on congress.

The President had shown, from the start of his administration, a unique level of concern about this topic and had frequently pushed it with Congress.

In his speech at the opening of the present session, he again called the attention of the legislature to it; and, at length, a law was enacted which, though less efficacious than the plan reported by the secretary of war, will probably, not soon, be carried into complete execution.

In his speech at the start of the current session, he once again drew the legislature's attention to it; and finally, a law was passed that, while not as effective as the plan suggested by the secretary of war, will likely take a while to be fully implemented.

Defeat of St. Clair.

In December, intelligence was received by the President, and immediately communicated to congress, that the American army had been totally defeated on the fourth of the preceding month.

In December, the President received intelligence, which was promptly shared with Congress, that the American army had been completely defeated on the fourth of the previous month.

Although the most prompt and judicious measures had been taken to raise the troops, and to march them to the frontiers, they could not be assembled in the neighbourhood of fort Washington until the month of September, nor was the establishment even then completed.

Although the quickest and smartest actions were taken to gather the troops and move them to the frontlines, they couldn't be assembled near Fort Washington until September, and even then, the setup wasn't fully complete.

The immediate objects of the expedition were, to destroy the Indian villages on the Miamis, to expel the savages from that country, and to connect it with the Ohio by a chain of posts which would prevent their return during the war.

The main goals of the expedition were to destroy the Indian villages on the Miamis, to drive the Native people out of that area, and to link it with the Ohio by a series of posts that would prevent their return during the war.

On the seventh of September, the regulars moved from their camp in the vicinity of fort Washington, and marching directly north, towards the object of their destination, established two intermediate posts[55] at the distance of rather more than forty miles from each other, as places of deposite, and of security either for convoys of provision which might follow the army, or for the army itself should any disaster befall it. The last of these works, fort Jefferson, was not completed until the 24th of October, before which time reinforcements were received of about three hundred and sixty militia. After placing garrisons in the forts, the effective number of the army, including militia, amounted to rather less than two thousand men. With this force, the general continued his march, which was rendered both slow and laborious by the necessity of opening a road. Small parties of Indians were frequently seen hovering about them, and some unimportant skirmishes took place. As the army approached the country in which they might expect to meet an enemy, about sixty of the militia deserted in a body. This diminution of force was not, in itself, an object of much concern. But there was reason to fear that the example, should those who set it be permitted to escape with impunity, would be extensively followed; and it was reported to be the intention of the deserters, to plunder convoys of provisions which were advancing at some distance in the rear. To prevent mischiefs of so serious a nature, the general detached Major Hamtranck with the first regiment in pursuit of the deserters, and directed him to secure the provisions under a strong guard.

On September 7th, the soldiers moved from their camp near Fort Washington and marched directly north toward their destination, setting up two temporary posts[55] about forty miles apart for storage and protection for supply convoys that might follow them or for the army itself in case of disaster. The last of these posts, Fort Jefferson, wasn't finished until October 24th, by which time they received about three hundred sixty militiamen as reinforcements. After placing guards at the forts, the effective army size, including militia, was just under two thousand men. With this force, the general continued the slow and difficult march, needing to clear a path. Small groups of Indians were often seen nearby, and a few minor skirmishes occurred. As the army neared enemy territory, about sixty militiamen deserted together. While this reduction in strength was not overly alarming on its own, there was concern that if the deserters escaped without consequences, many more would follow their example. Reports suggested that the deserters planned to loot supply convoys that were moving up behind them. To prevent such serious issues, the general sent Major Hamtranck with the first regiment to chase down the deserters and instructed him to safeguard the supplies with a strong guard.

The army, consisting of about fourteen hundred effective rank and file, continued its march; and, on the third of November, encamped about fifteen miles south of the Miamis villages. The right wing under the command of General Butler formed the first line, and lay with a creek, about twelve yards wide, immediately in its front. The left wing commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Darke, formed the second; and between the two lines, was an interval of about seventy yards.[56] The right flank was supposed to be secured by the creek, by a steep bank, and by a small body of troops; the left was covered by a party of cavalry, and by piquets. The militia crossed the creek, and advanced about a quarter of a mile in front, where they also encamped in two lines. On their approach, a few Indians who had shown themselves on the opposite side of the creek, fled with precipitation.

The army, made up of about fourteen hundred active soldiers, kept marching and, on November 3rd, set up camp about fifteen miles south of the Miami villages. The right wing, led by General Butler, formed the front line and was positioned with a creek, around twelve yards wide, right in front of it. The left wing, commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Darke, made up the second line, and there was a gap of about seventy yards between the two lines. The right flank was thought to be protected by the creek, a steep bank, and a small group of troops; the left was shielded by a cavalry unit and sentries. The militia crossed the creek and moved about a quarter of a mile ahead, where they also set up camp in two lines. As they approached, a few Indians who had been visible on the opposite bank fled in a hurry.

At this place, the general intended to throw up a slight work for the security of the baggage; and, after being joined by Major Hamtranck, to march as unincumbered, and as expeditiously as possible, to the villages he purposed to destroy.

At this location, the general planned to set up a temporary structure for the safety of the supplies; and, after meeting up with Major Hamtranck, to proceed as lightly loaded and as quickly as possible to the villages he intended to destroy.

In both these designs he was anticipated. About half an hour before sun rise the next morning, just after the troops had been dismissed from the parade, an unexpected attack was made upon the militia, who fled in the utmost confusion, and rushing into camp through the first line of continental troops, which had been formed the instant the first gun was discharged, threw them too into disorder. The exertions of the officers to restore order were not entirely successful. The Indians pressed close upon the heels of the flying militia, and engaged General Butler with great intrepidity. The action instantly became extremely warm; and the fire of the assailants, passing round both flanks of the first line, was, in a few minutes, poured with equal fury on the rear division. Its greatest weight was directed against the centre of each wing, where the artillery was posted; and the artillerists were mowed down in great numbers. Firing from the ground, and from the shelter which the woods afforded, the assailants were scarcely seen but when springing from one cover to another, in which manner they advanced close up to the American lines, and to the very mouths of the field pieces. They fought with the daring courage of men whose trade is war, and who are stimulated by all those passions which can impel the savage mind to vigorous exertions.

In both these plans, he was expected. About half an hour before sunrise the next morning, just after the troops had been dismissed from the parade, an unexpected attack was made on the militia, who fled in complete chaos, rushing into camp through the first line of continental troops, which had been formed the moment the first gun was fired, throwing them into disorder as well. The officers' efforts to restore order were not fully successful. The Indians were right on the heels of the retreating militia and confronted General Butler with great bravery. The fight quickly became intense; the attackers' fire began to circle around both flanks of the first line and, within minutes, was unleashed with equal force on the rear division. The heaviest attacks were aimed at the center of each wing, where the artillery was stationed, and the gunners were cut down in large numbers. Firing from the ground and using the cover of the woods, the attackers were barely seen except when they moved from one cover to another, advancing closely up to the American lines and right to the barrels of the cannons. They fought with the fierce courage of men who are trained for battle, driven by all the passions that can push a savage mind to act with intensity.

Under circumstances thus arduous, raw troops may be expected to exhibit that inequality which is found in human nature. While some of the American soldiers performed their duty with the utmost resolution, others seemed dismayed and terrified. Of this conduct the officers were, as usual, the victims. With a fearlessness which the occasion required, they exposed themselves to the most imminent dangers; and, in their efforts to change the face of affairs, fell in great numbers.

Under such tough circumstances, inexperienced soldiers are likely to show the inconsistencies that come with human nature. While some of the American troops tackled their duties with incredible determination, others appeared frightened and overwhelmed. As usual, the officers bore the brunt of this behavior. With the courage that the situation demanded, they put themselves in the line of fire, and in their attempts to turn the tide, many fell.

For several days, the Commander-in-chief had been afflicted with a severe disease, under which he still laboured, and which must have greatly affected him; but, though unable to display that activity which would have been useful in this severe conflict, neither the feebleness of his body, nor the peril of his situation, could prevent his delivering his orders with judgment and with self possession.[57]

For several days, the Commander-in-chief had been suffering from a serious illness, which he was still dealing with, and which must have impacted him a lot; however, even though he couldn't show the kind of energy that would have been helpful in this tough conflict, neither his physical weakness nor the danger of his situation stopped him from giving his orders with clarity and composure.[57]

It was soon perceived that the American fire could produce, on a concealed enemy, no considerable effect; and that the only hope of victory was placed in the bayonet. At the head of the second regiment, which formed the left of the left wing, Lieutenant Colonel Darke made an impetuous charge upon the enemy, forced them from their ground with some loss, and drove them about four hundred yards. He was followed by that whole wing; but the want of a sufficient number of riflemen to press this advantage, deprived him of the benefit which ought to have been derived from this effort; and, as soon as he gave over the pursuit, the Indians renewed their attack. In the mean time General Butler was mortally wounded, the left of the right wing was broken, the artillerists almost to a man killed, the guns seized, and the camp penetrated by the enemy. With his own regiment, and with the battalions commanded by Majors Butler[58] and Clarke, Darke was ordered again to charge with the bayonet. These orders were executed with intrepidity and momentary success. The Indians were driven out of the camp, and the artillery recovered. But while they were pressed in one point by the bravest of the American troops, their fire was kept up from every other with fatal effect. Several times particular corps charged them, always with partial success, but no universal effort could be made, and in every charge a great loss of officers was sustained, the consequences of which were severely felt. Instead of keeping their ranks, and executing the orders which were given, a great proportion of the soldiers flocked together in crowds, and were shot down without resistance. To save the remnant of his army was all that remained to be done; and, about half past nine in the morning, General St. Clair ordered Lieutenant Colonel Darke with the second regiment, to charge a body of Indians who had intercepted their retreat, and to gain the road. Major Clarke with his battalion was directed to cover the rear. These orders were executed, and a disorderly flight commenced. The pursuit was kept up about four miles, when, fortunately for the surviving Americans, that avidity for plunder which is a ruling passion among savages, called back the victorious Indians to the ramp, where the spoils of their vanquished foes were to be divided. The routed troops continued their flight to fort Jefferson, a distance of about thirty miles, throwing away their arms on the road. At this place they met Major Hamtranck with the first regiment; and a council of war was called to deliberate on the course to be pursued. As this regiment was far from restoring the strength of the morning, it was determined not to attempt to retrieve the fortune of the day: and, leaving the wounded at fort Jefferson, the army continued its retreat to fort Washington.

It quickly became clear that American gunfire was not having much effect on a hidden enemy, and the only hope for victory relied on the use of bayonets. Leading the second regiment, which made up the left side of the left wing, Lieutenant Colonel Darke made a fierce charge at the enemy, pushing them from their position with some losses and driving them back about four hundred yards. The entire wing followed him; however, the lack of enough riflemen to capitalize on this advantage meant he couldn't fully benefit from the effort. Once he stopped the pursuit, the Indians launched a renewed attack. Meanwhile, General Butler was mortally wounded, the left side of the right wing was broken, almost all the artillery crew was killed, the enemy seized the guns, and penetrated the camp. Darke was then ordered to charge again with the bayonet alongside his own regiment and the battalions led by Majors Butler[58] and Clarke. These orders were carried out with bravery and temporary success. The Indians were pushed out of the camp, and the artillery was reclaimed. But while they faced the fiercest of the American troops at one point, their fire continued from all other directions with devastating impact. Several specific units charged, each time with limited success, but no unified effort could be coordinated, and each charge resulted in significant officer casualties, the effects of which were deeply felt. Instead of maintaining their formation and following the given orders, many soldiers clustered together in groups and were shot down without putting up a fight. The only option left was to save what remained of his army, so around half past nine in the morning, General St. Clair ordered Lieutenant Colonel Darke and the second regiment to charge a group of Indians who had blocked their escape and to secure the road. Major Clarke was instructed to cover the rear. These orders were carried out, leading to a chaotic retreat. The pursuit lasted about four miles when, fortunately for the surviving Americans, the Indians' desire for plunder—often a dominant trait among savages—pulled them back to the camp to divide the spoils from their defeated foes. The fleeing troops continued their escape toward Fort Jefferson, about thirty miles away, discarding their weapons along the way. There, they encountered Major Hamtranck with the first regiment, and a council of war was convened to discuss the next steps. Since this regiment was not enough to restore their strength from the morning, they decided not to attempt to recover the day’s fortunes; instead, they left the wounded at Fort Jefferson and continued their retreat to Fort Washington.

In this disastrous battle, the loss on the part of the Americans was very great when compared with the numbers engaged. Thirty-eight commissioned officers were killed upon the field, and five hundred and ninety-three non-commissioned officers and privates were slain and missing. Twenty-one commissioned officers, several of whom afterwards died of their wounds, and two hundred and forty-two non-commissioned officers and privates were wounded. Among the dead was the brave and much lamented General Butler. This gallant officer had served through the war of the revolution; and had, on more than one occasion, distinguished himself in a remarkable manner. In the list of those who shared his fate, were the names of many other excellent officers who had participated in all the toils, the dangers, and the glory, of that long conflict which terminated in the independence of their country. At the head of the list of wounded were Lieutenant Colonels Gibson and Darke, Major Butler, and Adjutant General Sargent, all of whom were veteran officers of great merit, who displayed their accustomed bravery on this unfortunate day. General St. Clair, in his official letter, observed: "the loss the public has sustained by the fall of so many officers, particularly of General Butler and Major Ferguson, can not be too much regretted; but it is a circumstance that will alleviate the misfortune in some measure, that all of them fell most gallantly doing their duty."

In this disastrous battle, the loss suffered by the Americans was significant compared to the number of troops involved. Thirty-eight commissioned officers were killed on the field, and five hundred ninety-three non-commissioned officers and soldiers were either slain or went missing. Twenty-one commissioned officers, several of whom later died from their injuries, along with two hundred forty-two non-commissioned officers and soldiers were wounded. Among the dead was the brave and deeply mourned General Butler. This courageous officer had served throughout the Revolutionary War and had distinguished himself on multiple occasions. The list of those who fell alongside him included many other excellent officers who had endured the hardships, dangers, and honors of that long struggle that led to their country’s independence. The list of the wounded included Lieutenant Colonels Gibson and Darke, Major Butler, and Adjutant General Sargent, all of whom were respected veteran officers who showed their usual bravery on that unfortunate day. General St. Clair noted in his official letter: "the loss the public has suffered due to the deaths of so many officers, especially General Butler and Major Ferguson, cannot be regretted enough; however, it is somewhat comforting that they all fell heroically while fulfilling their duties."

From the weight of the fire, and the circumstance of his being attacked nearly at the same time in front and rear, General St. Clair was of opinion that he was overpowered by numbers. The intelligence afterwards collected would make the Indian force to consist of from one thousand to fifteen hundred warriors. Of their loss, no estimate could be made; the probability is, that it bore no proportion to that sustained by the American army.

From the intensity of the battle and the fact that he was attacked almost simultaneously from the front and back, General St. Clair believed he was outnumbered. Information gathered later suggested that the Indian force consisted of between one thousand and fifteen hundred warriors. No estimates could be made of their losses; it's likely that they were not comparable to the casualties suffered by the American army.

Nothing could be more unexpected than this severe disaster. The public had confidently anticipated a successful campaign, and could not believe, that the general who had been unfortunate, had not been culpable.

Nothing could be more surprising than this serious disaster. The public had confidently expected a successful campaign and couldn't believe that the general who had been unfortunate wasn't to blame.

1792

The Commander-in-chief requested with earnestness that a court martial should sit on his conduct; but this request could not be granted, because the army did not furnish a sufficient number of officers of a grade to form a court for his trial on military principles. Late in the session, a committee of the house of representatives was appointed to inquire into the cause of the failure of the expedition, whose report, in explicit terms, exculpated the Commander-in-chief. This inquiry, however, was instituted rather for the purpose of investigating the conduct of civil than of military officers; and was not conducted by military men. More satisfactory testimony in favour of St. Clair is furnished by the circumstance, that he still retained the undiminished esteem and good opinion of the President.

The Commander-in-chief earnestly requested that a court martial be convened to review his actions; however, this request couldn't be granted because the army did not have enough officers of the appropriate rank to form a court for his trial based on military standards. Later in the session, a committee from the House of Representatives was appointed to investigate the reasons behind the failure of the expedition, and their report clearly cleared the Commander-in-chief of blame. This inquiry, however, was more focused on the actions of civilian rather than military officers, and it was not led by military personnel. Further evidence in favor of St. Clair comes from the fact that he still enjoyed the full respect and good opinion of the President.

The Indian war now assumed a still more serious aspect. There was reason to fear that the hostile tribes would derive a great accession of strength from the impression which their success would make upon their neighbours; and the reputation of the government was deeply concerned in retrieving the fortune of its arms, and affording protection to its citizens. The President, therefore, lost no time in causing the estimates for a competent force to be prepared and laid before congress. In conformity with a report made by the secretary of war, a bill was brought into the house of representatives, directing three additional regiments of infantry, and a squadron of cavalry to be raised, to serve for three years, if not sooner discharged. The whole military establishment, if completed, would amount to about five thousand men. The additional regiments, however, were to be disbanded as soon as peace should be concluded with the Indians; and the President was authorized to discharge, or to forbear to raise, any part of them, "in case events should, in his judgment, render his so doing consistent with the public safety."

The Indian war now took on an even more serious tone. There were concerns that the hostile tribes would gain significant strength from the impression their success would leave on their neighbors; and the reputation of the government was heavily tied to turning around the fortunes of its military and protecting its citizens. Therefore, the President quickly moved to prepare the budget for a sufficient military force to present to Congress. Following a report from the secretary of war, a bill was introduced in the House of Representatives, which called for three additional infantry regiments and a cavalry squadron to be formed for three years, unless discharged sooner. If fully realized, the entire military establishment would consist of about five thousand troops. However, the additional regiments were to be disbanded as soon as peace was reached with the Indians, and the President was given the authority to release or not to raise any part of them, "if events should, in his judgment, make that consistent with public safety."

Opposition to the increase of the army.

This bill met with great opposition. A motion was made to strike out the section which authorized an augmentation of force. By those who argued in favour of the motion, the justice of the war was arraigned, and the practicability of obtaining peace at a much less expense than would be incurred in its further prosecution, was urged with vehemence. An extension of the present frontier was said not to be desirable, and if the citizens of the United States were recalled within their proper boundaries, hostilities would cease. At any rate, it was an idle waste of blood and treasure, to carry the war beyond the line of forts already established. It was only exposing their arms to disgrace, betraying their own weakness, and lessening the public confidence in the government, to send forth armies to be butchered in the forests, while the British were suffered to keep possession of posts within the territory of the United States. To this cause was to be ascribed any disposition which might exist on the part of the Indians to continue hostilities, and to its removal the efforts of the government ought to be directed.

This bill faced a lot of pushback. A motion was proposed to remove the section that allowed for an increase in military force. Those who supported the motion questioned the justness of the war and strongly argued that peace could be achieved at a much lower cost than continuing the conflict. They claimed that expanding the current borders wasn't a good idea and that if the citizens of the United States returned to their rightful territory, fighting would stop. Ultimately, it was seen as a pointless loss of lives and resources to carry the war beyond the already established forts. It was just risking their reputation, showing their weakness, and eroding public trust in the government to send troops to be killed in the wilderness while allowing the British to control posts within U.S. territory. Any inclination for the Indians to keep fighting should be attributed to this issue, and government efforts should focus on resolving it.

But, admitting the war to have been just in its commencement, and its continuance to be required by the honour and interest of the nation, yet as an invasion of the Indian country ought not to be attempted, this augmentation of the military establishment could not be necessary. Regular troops could only be useful as garrisons for posts to which the militia might resort for protection or supplies. Experience had proved that the sudden desultory attacks of the frontier militia and rangers were productive of more valuable consequences, than the methodical operations of a regular force. But, should it even be conceded that invasion and conquest were to be contemplated, the existing establishment, if completed, would be sufficiently great; and it was still insisted that, even for the purposes of conquest, the frontier militia were superior to any regulars whatever.

But, while acknowledging that the war was justified at its start and that its continuation is necessary for the nation’s honor and interests, an invasion of Indian territory should not be attempted, so this increase in the military presence isn’t needed. Regular troops would only serve as garrisons for posts where the militia could go for protection or supplies. Experience has shown that the quick and unpredictable attacks of the frontier militia and rangers resulted in more valuable outcomes than the organized actions of a regular army. However, even if we were to accept that invasion and conquest should be considered, the current military setup, if fully realized, would be sufficiently large; and it is still argued that, even for the purpose of conquest, the frontier militia are better than any regular troops.

The expense of such an army as the bill contemplated was said to be an object worthy of serious attention; and members were requested to observe the progress of this business, and to say where it would stop. At first, only a single regiment had been raised, and the expense was about one hundred thousand dollars; a second was afterwards added, which swelled the expense to three hundred thousand; and now a standing force of five thousand one hundred and sixty-eight men is contemplated, at an annual expense of above a million and a quarter. They were preparing to squander away money by millions; and no one, except those who were in the secrets of the cabinet, knew why the war had been thus carried on for three years.

The cost of the army proposed in the bill was considered an issue that needed serious attention, and members were asked to keep track of the progress on this matter and indicate where it might lead. Initially, just one regiment had been formed, costing around one hundred thousand dollars; later, a second regiment was added, raising the cost to three hundred thousand. Now, a permanent force of five thousand one hundred sixty-eight soldiers is being considered, with an annual cost exceeding a million and a quarter. They were getting ready to waste money by the millions, and no one, except those privy to the cabinet's discussions, understood why the war had continued for three years.

Against the motion for striking out, it was urged that the justice of the war could not be questioned by any man who would allow that self preservation, and indispensable necessity, could furnish sufficient motives for taking up arms. It was proved by unquestionable documents, that from the year 1783 to 1790, there had been not less than fifteen hundred persons, either the inhabitants of Kentucky, or emigrants on their way to that country, who had been massacred by the savages, or dragged into captivity; and there was reason to believe that on the frontiers of Virginia, and of Pennsylvania, the murdered and the prisoners would furnish a list almost equally numerous.

Against the motion to dismiss, it was argued that no one could question the justice of the war if they accepted that self-defense and essential necessity could provide valid reasons for taking up arms. It was demonstrated with undeniable evidence that from 1783 to 1790, at least fifteen hundred people, either residents of Kentucky or emigrants heading to that area, had been killed by savages or captured; and there was reason to believe that on the borders of Virginia and Pennsylvania, the number of murdered and captured would be nearly as high.

The conciliatory disposition of the government was stated, and its repeated efforts to obtain a peace were enumerated. It was particularly observed that in 1790, when a treaty was proposed at the Miamis villages, the Indians at first refused to treat;—they next required thirty days to deliberate;—this request was acceded to; and, in the interim, offensive operations were expressly prohibited by the President. Yet, notwithstanding this forbearance on the part of the whites, not less than one hundred and twenty persons were killed and captured by the savages, and several prisoners were roasted alive, during that short period; at the expiration of which, the Indians refused to give any answer to the proposition which had been made to them.

The government's willingness to negotiate was expressed, along with its ongoing efforts to secure peace. It was noted that in 1790, when a treaty was suggested at the Miamis villages, the Native Americans initially declined to talk; they then asked for thirty days to think it over; this request was granted, and during that time, the President specifically prohibited any military actions. However, despite this restraint from the settlers, more than one hundred and twenty people were killed or captured by the Native Americans, and several prisoners were burned alive during that brief period. When the thirty days ended, the Native Americans refused to respond to the peace proposal.

But it was now too late to inquire into the justice of the principles on which the war was originally undertaken. The nation was involved in it, and could not recede without exposing many innocent persons to be butchered by the enemy. Should the government determine to discontinue the war, would the Indians also consent to a cessation of hostilities? The government could not, without impeachment, both of its justice and humanity, abandon the inhabitants of the frontiers to the rage of their savage enemies; and although the excise might be unpopular, although money might still be wanted, what was the excise, what was money, when put in competition with the lives of their friends and brethren? A sufficient force must be raised for their defence, and the only question was what that force should be.

But now it was too late to question the fairness of the principles on which the war had started. The nation was already involved and couldn’t back out without putting many innocent people at risk of being killed by the enemy. If the government decided to end the war, would the Indigenous people agree to stop fighting too? The government couldn’t, without facing accusations of injustice and lack of humanity, abandon the people on the frontiers to the wrath of their brutal enemies; and even though the tax might not be popular and money might still be needed, what did a tax matter, what did money matter, when compared to the lives of their friends and family? A sufficient force must be raised for their protection, and the only question was what that force should be.

The calculations of the best informed men were in favour of employing an army not inferior to that proposed in the bill. When the known attachment of Indians to war and plunder was adverted to, and the excitements to that attachment which were furnished by the trophies acquired in the last two campaigns were considered, no man would venture to pronounce with confidence how extensive the combination against the United States might become, or what numbers they would have to encounter. It certainly behoved them to prepare in time for a much more vigorous effort than had hitherto been made. The objections drawn from the increased expense which such an effort would require, must entirely vanish before the eyes of any man, who looks forward to the consequences of another unsuccessful campaign. Such a disaster would eventually involve the nation in much greater expense than that which is now made the ground of opposition. Better therefore is it, to make at once a vigorous and effectual exertion to bring the contest to a close, than to continue gradually draining the treasury, by dragging on the war, and renewing hostility from year to year.

The calculations of the most knowledgeable people supported using an army at least as large as what was proposed in the bill. When considering the well-known eagerness of Native Americans for war and plunder, and the excitement they felt from the trophies gained in the last two campaigns, no one could confidently predict how extensive the alliance against the United States might be, or how many forces they would have to face. It was certainly necessary for them to prepare in advance for a much stronger effort than had been made before. Any objections based on the increased costs that such an effort would require should completely fade away for anyone who considers the repercussions of another unsuccessful campaign. Such a disaster would eventually lead to much greater expenses for the nation than what is currently being used as an argument against it. Therefore, it’s better to make a strong and effective effort to end the conflict once and for all, rather than continuing to drain the treasury year after year by prolonging the war and renewing hostilities.

The supporters of the bill also appealed to experience for the superiority of regular troops over militia, in accomplishing all the purposes, even of Indian war; and those arguments were urged in favour of this theory, which the subject readily suggests.

The supporters of the bill also referred to experience to highlight the advantages of regular troops over militia in achieving all objectives, including those associated with Indian wars; and those arguments were presented to support this theory, which the topic clearly indicates.

The motion for striking out the section was lost; and the bill was carried for the augmentation of force required by the executive.

The motion to remove the section was rejected, and the bill for increasing the force needed by the executive was approved.

The treasury was not in a condition to meet the demands upon it, which the increased expenses of the war would unavoidably occasion; and sources of additional revenue were to be explored. A select committee to whom this subject was referred, brought in a resolution directing the secretary of the treasury to report his opinion to the house on the best mode of raising those additional supplies which the public service might require for the current year.

The treasury wasn't in a position to handle the demands placed on it, which the rising costs of the war would inevitably cause; new sources of revenue needed to be found. A special committee assigned to this issue proposed a resolution instructing the secretary of the treasury to share his thoughts with the house on the best ways to raise the extra funds needed for public services this year.

This proposition gave rise to a very animated debate.

This proposal sparked a lively debate.

It will be recollected that when the act for establishing the treasury department was under consideration, the clause which rendered it the duty of the secretary to digest and report plans for the improvement and management of the revenue, and for the support of public credit, was earnestly opposed. A large majority, however, was in favour of the principle; and, after being so modified, as only to admit a report if required by the house, it was retained in the bill. In complying with the various resolutions of congress, calling for reports on subjects connected with his department, the secretary had submitted plans which, having been profoundly considered, were well digested, and accompanied by arguments, the force of which it was difficult to resist. His measures were generally supported by a majority of congress; and, while the high credit of the United States was believed to attest their wisdom, the masterly manner in which his reports were drawn contributed to raise still higher, that reputation for great talents which he had long possessed. To the further admission of these reports, it was determined, on this occasion, to make a vigorous resistance.

It should be remembered that when the bill to create the treasury department was being discussed, the section that required the secretary to develop and report plans for improving revenue management and supporting public credit was strongly opposed. However, a large majority supported the principle, and after being modified to allow a report only if requested by the house, it was included in the bill. In response to various resolutions from Congress asking for reports on topics related to his department, the secretary presented plans that had been thoroughly considered and well-prepared, accompanied by arguments that were hard to refute. His proposals generally received backing from most of Congress; and while the strong credit of the United States was seen as proof of their soundness, the skillful way his reports were crafted further elevated his already high reputation for exceptional talent. On this occasion, it was decided to strongly oppose any further acceptance of these reports.

But the opposition was not successful. On taking the question, the resolution was carried; thirty-one members voting in its favour, and twenty-seven against it.

But the opposition wasn't successful. When the question was put to a vote, the resolution passed; thirty-one members voted in favor, and twenty-seven against it.

Report of the secretary of the treasury for raising additional supplies.

The report[59] made by the secretary in pursuance of this resolution, recommended certain augmentations of the duties on imports; and was immediately referred to the consideration of a committee of the whole house. Resolutions were then passed which were to form the basis of a bill; and which adopted, not only the principles, but, with the exception of a few unimportant alterations, the minute details of the report.

The report[59] created by the secretary following this resolution recommended some increases in import duties; it was quickly referred to the entire house for discussion. Resolutions were then passed that would serve as the foundation for a bill; these not only embraced the principles but also, with just a few minor changes, the specific details of the report.

Before the question was taken on the bill, a motion was made to limit its duration, the vote upon which strongly marked the progress of opinion in the house respecting those systems of finance which were believed to have established the credit of the United States.

Before the question was raised about the bill, a motion was made to limit its duration, and the vote on that motion clearly indicated the shift in opinion within the house regarding the financial systems that were thought to have secured the credit of the United States.

The secretary of the treasury had deemed it indispensable to the creation of public credit, that the appropriations of funds for the payment of the interest, and the gradual redemption of the principal of the national debt, should be not only sufficient, but permanent also. A party was found in the first congress who opposed this principle; and were in favour of retaining a full power over the subject in each branch of the legislature, by making annual appropriations. The arguments which had failed in congress appear to have been more successfully employed with the people. Among the multiplied vices which were ascribed to the funding system, it was charged with introducing a permanent and extensive mortgage of funds, which was alleged to strengthen unduly the hands of the executive magistrate, and to be one of the many evidences which existed, of monarchical propensities in those who administered the government.

The secretary of the treasury believed it was essential for establishing public credit that the funding for interest payments and the gradual repayment of the national debt should be not just adequate, but also permanent. There was a faction in the first congress that opposed this idea, preferring to retain full control over the issue in each legislative branch by making annual appropriations. The arguments that had failed in congress seemed to resonate better with the public. Among the many criticisms directed at the funding system, it was accused of creating a permanent and significant financial obligation, which was said to give the executive branch too much power and serve as yet another sign of the monarchical tendencies of those in charge of the government.

The report lately made by the secretary of the treasury, and the bill founded on that report, contemplated a permanent increase of the duties on certain specified articles; and a permanent appropriation of the revenue arising from them, to the purposes of the national debt. Thirty-one members were in favour of the motion for limiting the duration of the bill, and only thirty against it. By the rules of the house, the speaker has a right first to vote as a member; and, if the numbers should then be equally divided, to decide as speaker. Being opposed to the limitation, the motion was lost by his voice.

The report recently presented by the secretary of the treasury, along with the bill based on that report, proposed a permanent increase in the duties on certain specified items, and a permanent allocation of the revenue generated from them to cover the national debt. Thirty-one members supported the motion to limit the duration of the bill, while only thirty were against it. According to the house rules, the speaker has the right to vote as a member first, and if the votes are tied, to cast the deciding vote as speaker. Since he opposed the limitation, the motion failed because of his vote.

On the eighth of May, after an active and interesting session, congress adjourned to the first Monday in November.

On May 8th, after a busy and engaging session, congress adjourned until the first Monday in November.

The asperity which, on more than one occasion, discovered itself in debate, was a certain index of the growing exasperation of parties; and the strength of the opposition on those questions which brought into review the points on which the administration was to be attacked, denoted the impression which the specific charges brought against those who conducted public affairs, had made on the minds of the people, in an extensive division of the continent. It may conduce to a more perfect understanding of subsequent transactions, to present, in this place, a sketch of those charges.

The harshness that occasionally emerged during discussions was a clear sign of the increasing frustration among the parties. The strength of the opposition on issues that critiqued the administration showed how strongly the specific accusations against those in charge of public affairs had resonated with people across a large portion of the continent. To better understand the events that followed, it might be helpful to outline those accusations here.

Strictures on the conduct of administration, with a view of parties.

It was alleged that the public debt was too great to be paid before other causes of adding to it would occur. This accumulation of debt had been artificially produced by the assumption of what was due from the states. Its immediate effect was to deprive the government of its power over those easy sources of revenue, which, applied to its ordinary necessities and exigencies, would have answered them habitually, and thereby have avoided those burdens on the people which occasioned such murmurs against taxes, and tax gatherers. As a consequence of it, although the calls for money had not been greater than must be expected for the same or equivalent exigencies, yet congress had been already obliged, not only to strain the impost until it produced clamour, and would produce evasion, and war on their own citizens to collect it, but even to resort to an excise law, of odious character with the people, partial in its operation, unproductive unless enforced by arbitrary and vexatious means, and committing the authority of the government in parts where resistance was most probable, and coercion least practicable.

It was said that the public debt was too high to be settled before other factors added to it. This buildup of debt was created by taking on what was owed by the states. Its immediate consequence was to remove the government's access to easy sources of revenue, which, if used for its regular needs and emergencies, would have consistently met those demands and avoided the burdens on the people that led to complaints about taxes and tax collectors. As a result, even though the need for money hadn't been more than what was expected for similar needs, Congress had already been forced to not only push the tax to the point of outcry, leading to evasion and conflict with their own citizens to collect it, but also to implement a tax law that was unpopular with the public, unfair in its impact, unproductive unless enforced through harsh and irritating means, and putting the government's authority at risk in areas where resistance was most likely and enforcement less effective.

That the United States, if left free to act at their discretion, might borrow at two-thirds of the interest contracted to be paid to the public creditors, and thus discharge themselves from the principal in two-thirds of the time: but from this they were precluded by the irredeemable quality of the debt; a quality given for the avowed purpose of inviting its transfer to foreign countries. This transfer of the principal when completed would occasion an exportation of three millions of dollars annually for the interest, a drain of coin without example, and of the consequences of which no calculation could be made.

That the United States, if allowed to make their own decisions, could borrow at two-thirds of the interest promised to public creditors, and therefore pay off the principal in two-thirds of the time. However, they were prevented from doing this because of the irredeemable nature of the debt; this characteristic was intentionally created to encourage its transfer to foreign countries. Once this transfer of the principal was finalized, it would lead to an annual outflow of three million dollars for interest payments, an unprecedented drain of currency, with consequences that could not be anticipated.

The banishment of coin would be completed by ten millions of paper money in the form of bank bills, which were then issuing into circulation. Nor would this be the only mischief resulting from the institution of the bank. The ten or twelve per cent, annual profit paid to the lenders of this paper medium would take out of the pockets of the people, who would have had, without interest, the coin it was banishing. That all the capital employed in paper speculation is barren and useless, producing like that on a gaming table no accession to itself, and is withdrawn from commerce and agriculture, where it would have produced addition to the common mass. The wealth therefore heaped upon individuals by the funding and banking systems, would be productive of general poverty and distress. That in addition to the encouragement these measures gave to vice and idleness, they had furnished effectual means of corrupting such a portion of the legislature as turned the balance between the honest voters. This corrupt squad, deciding the voice of the legislature, had manifested their dispositions to get rid of the limitations imposed by the constitution; limitations on the faith of which the states acceded to that instrument. They were proceeding rapidly in their plan of absorbing all power, invading the rights of the states, and converting the federal into a consolidated government.

The removal of coins would be completed with ten million in paper money as banknotes, which were then being circulated. But this wouldn't be the only problem caused by the establishment of the bank. The annual profit of ten or twelve percent paid to the lenders of this paper currency would take money out of the pockets of people who would have had, without interest, the coins it was replacing. All the capital used for paper speculation is barren and useless, producing no growth like that at a gaming table, and it is taken away from commerce and agriculture, where it could have contributed to the overall wealth. Therefore, the wealth accumulated by individuals through the funding and banking systems would lead to widespread poverty and hardship. In addition to encouraging vice and laziness, these measures effectively corrupted parts of the legislature that swayed the balance against honest voters. This corrupt group, influencing the legislature, showed their intention to eliminate the limitations set by the constitution—limitations that the states relied on when they agreed to that document. They were quickly advancing in their plan to take all power, infringing on states' rights, and turning the federal government into a consolidated one.

That the ultimate object of all this was to prepare the way for a change from the present republican form of government to that of a monarchy, of which the English constitution was to be the model. So many of the friends of monarchy were in the legislature, that aided by the corrupt squad of paper dealers who were at their devotion, they made a majority in both houses. The republican party, even when united with the anti-federalists, continued a minority.

That the main goal of all this was to set the stage for a shift from the current republican government to a monarchy, modeled after the English constitution. There were so many supporters of monarchy in the legislature, and with the help of the corrupt group of paper dealers who were loyal to them, they formed a majority in both houses. The republican party, even when working together with the anti-federalists, remained a minority.

That of all the mischiefs resulting from the system of measures which was so much reprobated, none was so afflicting, so fatal to every honest hope, as the corruption of the legislature. As it was the earliest of these measures, it became the instrument for producing the rest, and would be the instrument for producing in future, a king, lords, and commons; or whatever else those who directed it might choose. Withdrawn such a distance from the eye of their constituents, they would form the most corrupt government on earth, if the means of their corruption were not prevented.

Of all the problems caused by the widely criticized system of measures, none was as troubling or destructive to any genuine hope as the corruption of the legislature. Since it was the first of these measures, it became the tool for creating all the others and would continue to be the tool for creating in the future a king, lords, and commons, or whatever else those in charge might decide. Being so far removed from the scrutiny of their constituents, they would create the most corrupt government on earth if the means of their corruption weren’t stopped.

These strictures on the conduct of administration were principally directed against measures which had originated with the secretary of the treasury, and had afterwards received the sanction of the legislature. In the southern division of the continent, that officer was unknown, except to a few military friends, and to those who had engaged in the legislative or executive departments of the former or present government. His systems of revenue having been generally opposed by the southern members, and the original opposition to the constitution having been particularly great in Virginia and North Carolina, the aspersions on his views, and on the views of the eastern members by whom his plans had been generally supported, were seldom controverted. The remote tendency of particular systems, and the motives for their adoption, are so often subjects of conjecture, that the judgment, when exercised upon them, is peculiarly exposed to the influence of the passions; and where measures are in themselves burdensome, and the necessity for their adoption has not been appreciated, suspicions of their unknown advocates, can seldom be unsuccessfully urged by persons, in whom the people have placed their confidence. It is not therefore cause of astonishment, that the dark motives ascribed to the authors of tax laws, should be extensively believed.

These restrictions on how the government was run were mainly aimed at actions that came from the secretary of the treasury and were later approved by the legislature. In the southern part of the country, that officer was unfamiliar to most people, except for a few military acquaintances and those involved in the legislative or executive branches of past or current administrations. His revenue plans faced significant opposition from southern representatives, and resistance to the constitution was especially strong in Virginia and North Carolina. As a result, the criticisms of his ideas and those of the eastern members who generally backed his plans were rarely challenged. The distant implications of specific policies and the reasons for their introduction are often subjects of speculation, making people's judgments about them particularly vulnerable to emotional influence. When policies are burdensome and the reasons for implementing them aren't understood, it's not surprising that suspicions about their unknown supporters are often successfully pushed by those whom the public trusts. Thus, it's not surprising that the negative motives attributed to the creators of tax laws are widely accepted.

Throughout the United States, the party opposed to the constitution had charged its supporters with a desire to establish a monarchy on the ruins of republican government; and the constitution itself was alleged to contain principles which would prove the truth of this charge. The leaders of that party had, therefore, been ready from the instant the government came into operation, to discover, in all its measures, those monarchical tendencies which they had perceived in the instrument they opposed.

Throughout the United States, the party that opposed the constitution accused its supporters of wanting to create a monarchy from the ashes of republican government; they claimed that the constitution itself included principles that would validate this accusation. As a result, the leaders of that party were quick to identify, from the moment the government began operating, any monarchical tendencies in its actions that they had seen in the document they opposed.

The salaries allowed to public officers, though so low[60] as not to afford a decent maintenance to those who resided at the seat of government, were declared to be so enormously high, as clearly to manifest a total disregard of that simplicity and economy which were the characteristics of republics.

The salaries given to public officials, although so low[60] that they couldn't provide a decent living for those who lived in the capital, were said to be so excessively high that they showed a complete disregard for the simplicity and frugality that are typical of republics.

The levees of the President, and the evening parties of Mrs. Washington, were said to be imitations of regal institutions, designed to accustom the American people to the pomp and manners of European courts. The Vice President too was said to keep up the state and dignity of a monarch, and to illustrate, by his conduct, the principles which were inculcated in his political works.

The President's levees and Mrs. Washington's evening parties were thought to mimic royal traditions, meant to get Americans used to the elegance and behavior of European courts. The Vice President was also said to uphold the status and dignity of a king, demonstrating through his actions the principles laid out in his political writings.

The Indian war they alleged was misconducted, and unnecessarily prolonged for the purposes of expending the public money, and of affording a pretext for augmenting the military establishment, and increasing the revenue.

The Indian war they claimed was poorly managed and dragged on longer than necessary to waste public funds and create a reason to boost the military and raise taxes.

All this prodigal waste of the money of the people was designed to keep up the national debt, and the influence it gave the government, which, united with standing armies, and immense revenues, would enable their rulers to rivet the chains which they were secretly forging. Every prediction which had been uttered respecting the anti-republican principles of the government, was said to be rapidly verifying, and that which was disbelieved as prophecy, was daily becoming history. If a remedy for these ills was not found in the increased representation of the people which would take place at the ensuing elections, they would become too monstrous to be borne; and when it was recollected that the division of opinion was marked by a geographical line, there was reason to fear that the union would be broken into one or more confederacies.

All this reckless spending of the people's money was meant to maintain the national debt and the power it gave the government, which, along with standing armies and huge revenues, would allow their leaders to tighten the chains they were secretly creating. Every prediction made about the anti-republican principles of the government was said to be quickly coming true, and what had been dismissed as prophecy was becoming reality every day. If a solution to these problems wasn't found through the increased representation of the people in the upcoming elections, they would become unbearable; and considering that the division of opinion was marked by a geographical line, there was reason to fear that the union would splinter into one or more confederacies.

These irritable symptoms had assumed appearances of increased malignity during the session of congress which had just terminated; and, to the President, who firmly believed that the union and the liberty of the states depended on the preservation of the government, they were the more unpleasant and the more alarming, because they were displayed in full force in his cabinet.

These annoying symptoms had taken on a more serious tone during the recently concluded session of Congress; and for the President, who strongly believed that the unity and freedom of the states relied on the stability of the government, they were even more troubling and concerning, as they were evident in full force within his cabinet.

Disagreement between the secretaries of state and treasury.

Between the secretaries of the state and treasury departments, a disagreement existed, which seems to have originated in an early stage of the administration, and to have acquired a regular accession of strength from circumstances which were perpetually occurring, until it grew into open and irreconcileable hostility.

Between the secretaries of the state and treasury departments, there was a disagreement that appeared to start early in the administration and consistently gained strength from ongoing circumstances, until it escalated into open and irreconcilable conflict.

Without tracing this disagreement to those motives, which, in elective governments especially, often produce enmities between distinguished personages, neither of whom acknowledges the superiority of the other, such radical differences of opinion, on points which would essentially influence the course of the government, were supposed to exist between the secretaries, as, in a great measure, to account for this unextinguishable enmity. These differences of opinion were, perhaps, to be ascribed, in some measure, to a difference in the original structure of their minds, and, in some measure, to the difference of the situations in which they had been placed.

Without tracing this disagreement back to the motives that often create conflicts between prominent figures in elective governments—where neither side acknowledges the other's superiority—such significant differences of opinion on issues that would greatly affect the government were believed to exist between the secretaries, partly explaining this ongoing hostility. These disagreements were likely due, in part, to the different ways in which their minds were structured, and also to the distinct situations they had faced.

Until near the close of the war, Mr. Hamilton had served his country in the field; and, just before its termination, had passed from the camp into congress, where he remained for some time after peace had been established. In the former station, the danger to which the independence of his country was exposed from the imbecility of the government was perpetually before his eyes; and, in the latter, his attention was forcibly directed towards the loss of its reputation, and the sacrifice of its best interests, which were to be ascribed to the same cause. Mr. Hamilton, therefore, was the friend of a government which should possess, in itself, sufficient powers and resources to maintain the character, and defend the integrity of the nation. Having long felt and witnessed the mischiefs produced by the absolute sovereignty of the states, and by the control which they were enabled and disposed separately to exercise over every measure of general concern, he was particularly apprehensive of danger from that quarter; which he, probably, believed was to be the more dreaded, because the habits and feelings of the American people were calculated to inspire state, rather than national prepossessions. Under the influence of these impressions, he is understood to have avowed opinions in the convention favourable to a system in which the executive and senate, though elective, were to be rather more permanent, than they were rendered in that which was actually proposed. He afterwards supported the constitution, as framed, with great ability, and contributed essentially to its adoption. But he still retained, and openly avowed, the opinion, that the greatest hazards to which it was exposed arose from its weakness, and that American liberty and happiness had much more to fear from the encroachments of the great states, than from those of the general government.

Until near the end of the war, Mr. Hamilton served his country in the military; and just before it ended, he transitioned from the battlefield to Congress, where he stayed for a while after peace was achieved. In his former role, he constantly faced the risks to his country’s independence due to the government’s weakness; in the latter, he was sharply aware of the damage to its reputation and the sacrifice of its best interests, which stemmed from the same issue. Therefore, Mr. Hamilton was a supporter of a government that had enough powers and resources to maintain the nation’s character and defend its integrity. Having long felt and witnessed the problems caused by the absolute sovereignty of the states, and the ability they had to control every matter of general concern, he was particularly worried about threats from that direction, which he likely believed was to be more feared, as the habits and feelings of the American people tended to foster state loyalty over national loyalty. Influenced by these feelings, he is thought to have expressed views in the convention that favored a system where the executive and the Senate, although elected, had a more permanent nature than in the plan that was ultimately proposed. He later supported the constitution, as it was drafted, with great skill and played a key role in its adoption. However, he still held and openly stated the belief that the greatest dangers to it came from its weaknesses, and that American liberty and happiness had much more to fear from the overreach of powerful states than from the general government.

Mr. Jefferson had retired from congress before the depreciation of the currency had produced an entire dependence of the general on the local governments; after which he filled the highest offices in the state of which he was a citizen. About the close of the war he was re-elected to congress; but, being soon afterwards employed on a mission to the court of Versailles, where he remained, while the people of France were taking the first steps of that immense revolution which has astonished and agitated two quarters of the world. In common with all his countrymen, he felt a strong interest in favour of the reformers; and it is not unreasonable to suppose, that while residing at that court, and associating with those who meditated some of the great events which have since taken place, his mind might be warmed with the abuses of the monarchy which were perpetually in his view, and he might be led to the opinion that liberty could sustain no danger but from the executive power. Mr. Jefferson, therefore, seems to have entertained no apprehensions from the debility of the government; no jealousy of the state sovereignties; and no suspicion of their encroachments. His fears took a different direction, and all his precautions were used to check and limit the exercise of the powers vested in the government of the United States. Neither could he perceive danger to liberty except from that government, and especially from the executive department.

Mr. Jefferson had stepped down from Congress before the decline of the currency led to a complete reliance of the federal government on local governments. After that, he took on the highest positions in the state where he lived. Near the end of the war, he was re-elected to Congress, but soon after, he was assigned to a mission in Versailles, where he stayed while the French were starting the massive revolution that would shock and stir up two parts of the world. Like all his fellow countrymen, he felt a strong interest in supporting the reformers. It’s not unreasonable to think that while living at that court and socializing with people planning some of the major events that followed, he might have been influenced by the constant abuses of the monarchy around him, leading him to believe that liberty was only at risk from the executive power. Therefore, Mr. Jefferson didn’t seem to worry about the weaknesses of the government, feel any jealousy towards state sovereignties, or suspect their overreach. His concerns were directed elsewhere, and all his efforts were focused on checking and limiting the powers given to the U.S. government. He only saw a threat to liberty from that government, especially from the executive branch.

He did not feel so sensibly, as those who had continued in the United States, the necessity of adopting the constitution; and had, at one time, avowed a wish that it might be rejected by such a number of states as would secure certain alterations which he thought essential. His principal objections seem to have been, the want of a bill of rights, and the re-eligibility of the President. From this opinion, however, in favour of a partial rejection, he is understood to have receded, after seeing the plan pursued by the convention of Massachusetts, and followed by other states; which was to adopt unconditionally, and to annex a recommendation of the amendments which were desired.[61]

He didn’t feel as strongly as those who stayed in the United States about needing to adopt the constitution; at one point, he even expressed a desire for it to be rejected by enough states to ensure certain changes he believed were essential. His main concerns seemed to be the lack of a bill of rights and the ability of the President to be re-elected. However, he is understood to have changed his mind about a partial rejection after observing the approach taken by the Massachusetts convention, which was then followed by other states: to adopt it without conditions while also recommending the desired amendments.[61]

To these causes of division, another was superadded, the influence of which was soon felt in all the political transactions of the government.

To these causes of division, another was added, and its impact was quickly felt in all the political dealings of the government.

The war which was terminated in 1783, had left in the bosoms of the American people, a strong attachment to France, and enmity to Great Britain. These feelings, in a greater or less degree, were perhaps universal; and had been prevented from subsiding by circumstances to which allusions have already been made. They had evinced themselves, in the state legislatures, by commercial regulations; and were demonstrated by all those means by which the public sentiment is usually displayed. They found their way also into the national councils, where they manifested themselves in the motions respecting the favours which ought to be shown to nations having commercial treaties with the United States.

The war that ended in 1783 left the American people with a strong bond to France and a hostility toward Great Britain. These feelings were probably widespread, and they had been kept alive by certain circumstances mentioned earlier. They showed up in state legislatures through commercial regulations and were expressed in all the usual ways public opinion is shown. They also made their way into the national discussions, where they were reflected in proposals about the support that should be given to nations with commercial treaties with the United States.

Although affection for France, and jealousy of Britain, were sentiments common to the people of America, the same unanimity did not exist respecting the influence which ought to be allowed to those sentiments, over the political conduct of the nation. While many favoured such discriminations as might eventually turn the commerce of the United States into new channels, others maintained that, on this subject, equality ought to be observed; that trade ought to be guided by the judgment of individuals, and that no sufficient motives existed for that sacrifice of general and particular interests, which was involved in the discriminations proposed;—discriminations which, in their view, amounted to a tax on American agriculture, and a bounty on the navigation and manufactures of a favoured foreign nation.

Although people in America generally felt a mix of affection for France and jealousy towards Britain, they didn’t all agree on how much these feelings should influence the country's political decisions. While some supported policies that could shift U.S. trade into new markets, others argued that trade should be fair and determined by individual choices, and that there weren’t enough good reasons to sacrifice both general and specific interests for such changes. They believed these proposed changes effectively created a tax on American farming while giving advantages to the shipping and manufacturing of a favored foreign nation.

The former opinion was taken up with warmth by the secretary of state; and the latter was adopted with equal sincerity by the secretary of the treasury. This contrariety of sentiment respecting commercial regulations was only a part of a general system. It extended itself to all the relations which might subsist between America and those two great powers.

The earlier opinion was embraced enthusiastically by the Secretary of State, while the latter was accepted just as earnestly by the Secretary of the Treasury. This disagreement over commercial regulations was just a part of a larger system. It affected all the relationships that could exist between America and those two major powers.

In all popular governments, the press is the most ready channel by which the opinions and the passions of the few are communicated to the many; and of the press, the two great parties forming in the United States, sought to avail themselves. The Gazette of the United States supported the systems of the treasury department, while other papers enlisted themselves under the banners of the opposition. Conspicuous among these, was the National Gazette, a paper edited by a clerk in the department of state. The avowed purpose for which the secretary patronized this paper, was to present to the eye of the American people, European intelligence derived from the Leyden gazette, instead of English papers; but it soon became the vehicle of calumny against the funding and banking systems, against the duty on home-made spirits, which was denominated an excise, and against the men who had proposed and supported those measures. With perhaps equal asperity, the papers attached to the party which had defended these systems, assailed the motives of the leaders of the opposition.

In all popular governments, the press is the quickest way for the opinions and feelings of a few to be shared with the many; and both major parties in the United States tried to use it to their advantage. The Gazette of the United States backed the treasury department's policies, while other newspapers joined the opposition. One of the most notable was the National Gazette, a paper run by a clerk in the state department. The stated goal of the secretary in supporting this paper was to present European news sourced from the Leyden Gazette, instead of English newspapers; however, it quickly became a platform for criticism against the funding and banking systems, the tax on domestically made spirits labeled as an excise, and the individuals who proposed and backed those policies. Similarly, the newspapers aligned with the party defending these systems harshly attacked the motivations of the opposition's leaders.

Letters from Washington on this subject.

This schism in his cabinet was a subject of extreme mortification to the President. Entertaining a high respect for the talents, and a real esteem for the characters, of both gentlemen, he was unwilling to part with either; and exerted all the influence he possessed to effect a reconciliation between them. In a letter of the 23d of August, addressed to the secretary of state, after reviewing the critical situation of the United States with respect to its external relations, he thus expressed himself on this delicate subject. "How unfortunate and how much is it to be regretted then, that, while we are encompassed on all sides with avowed enemies, and insidious friends, internal dissensions should be harassing and tearing our vitals. The last, to me, is the most serious, the most alarming, and the most afflicting of the two; and, without more charity for the opinions of one another in governmental matters, or some more infallible criterion by which the truth of speculative opinions, before they have undergone the test of experience, are to be forejudged, than has yet fallen to the lot of fallibility, I believe it will be difficult, if not impracticable, to manage the reins of government, or to keep the parts of it together: for if, instead of laying our shoulders to the machine, after measures are decided on, one pulls this way, and another that, before the utility of the thing is fairly tried, it must inevitably be torn asunder; and, in my opinion, the fairest prospect of happiness and prosperity that ever was presented to man will be lost, perhaps, for ever.

This division in his cabinet was a source of great embarrassment for the President. He held a deep respect for the skills and a genuine regard for the characters of both men, and he didn't want to let go of either. He used all the influence he had to try to bring them back together. In a letter dated August 23, addressed to the Secretary of State, after reviewing the critical situation of the United States regarding its foreign relations, he expressed his thoughts on this sensitive issue. "How unfortunate and regrettable it is that, while we are surrounded by open enemies and deceitful friends, internal conflicts should be distressing and tearing us apart. The latter is, to me, the most serious, alarming, and troubling of the two; and without greater tolerance for each other's opinions on government matters, or a more reliable way to judge the truth of speculative ideas before they've been tested through experience, it will be hard, if not impossible, to manage the government effectively or keep it united. If, instead of coming together after decisions are made, one person pulls in one direction and another in another, before the usefulness of the decision is clearly evaluated, it will inevitably be torn apart; and in my view, the greatest chance for happiness and prosperity that has ever been offered to humanity could be lost, perhaps forever."

"My earnest wish and my fondest hope therefore is, that instead of wounding suspicions, and irritating charges, there may be liberal allowances, mutual forbearances, and temporizing yielding on all sides. Under the exercise of these, matters will go on smoothly; and if possible, more prosperously. Without them, every thing must rub; the wheels of government will clog; our enemies will triumph; and, by throwing their weight into the disaffected scale, may accomplish the ruin of the goodly fabric we have been erecting."

"My sincere wish and my deepest hope, then, is that instead of hurtful doubts and annoying accusations, we can have generous understanding, mutual patience, and some compromise from everyone involved. With these in place, things will proceed smoothly, and hopefully even more successfully. Without them, everything will be a struggle; the government will become inefficient; our enemies will gain the upper hand; and by strengthening those who are discontent, they could bring down the valuable structure we have been building."

"I do not mean to apply this advice, or these observations, to any particular person or character. I have given them in the same general terms to other officers[62] of the government, because the disagreements which have arisen from difference of opinions, and the attacks which have been made upon almost all the measures of government, and most of its executive officers, have for a long time past filled me with painful sensations, and can not fail, I think, of producing unhappy consequences, at home and abroad."

"I don't intend to direct this advice or these observations at any specific person or character. I’ve shared them in a general way with other officers[62] of the government because the disagreements stemming from differing opinions, along with the criticisms aimed at nearly all government actions and most of its executive officers, have for quite some time left me feeling distressed, and I believe they will inevitably lead to negative outcomes, both domestically and internationally."

In a subsequent letter to the same gentleman, in answer to one which enclosed some documents designed to prove that, though desirous of amending the constitution, he had favoured its adoption, the President said—"I did not require the evidence of the extracts which you enclosed me, to convince me of your attachment to the constitution of the United States, or of your disposition to promote the general welfare of this country; but I regret, deeply regret, the difference of opinion which has arisen, and divided you and another principal officer of the government—and wish devoutly there could be an accommodation of them by mutual yieldings.

In a follow-up letter to the same gentleman, in response to one that included some documents meant to show that, although he wanted to improve the constitution, he had supported its adoption, the President said—"I didn't need the proof from the extracts you sent me to be convinced of your commitment to the constitution of the United States or your desire to promote the general welfare of this country; however, I deeply regret the disagreement that has come up and separated you from another key official in the government—and I sincerely hope there can be a resolution through mutual concessions."

"A measure of this sort would produce harmony and consequent good in our public councils; and the contrary will inevitably produce confusion and serious mischiefs—and for what? because mankind can not think alike, but would adopt different means to attain the same end. For I will frankly and solemnly declare that I believe the views of both to be pure and well meant, and that experience only will decide with respect to the salubrity of the measures which are the subjects of this dispute.

"A measure like this would create harmony and positive outcomes in our public discussions; the opposite will inevitably lead to chaos and serious problems—and for what? Because people can't think the same way and will choose different paths to achieve the same goal. I will honestly and sincerely state that I believe the intentions of both sides are genuine and well-meaning, and that only experience will reveal the effectiveness of the measures at the center of this debate."

"Why then, when some of the best citizens of the United States—men of discernment—uniform and tried patriots—who have no sinister views to promote, but are chaste in their ways of thinking and acting, are to be found some on one side, and some on the other of the questions which have caused these agitations—why should either of you be so tenacious of your opinions as to make no allowance for those of the other?

"Why is it that some of the best citizens of the United States—smart, dedicated patriots—who have no hidden agendas but are straightforward in their thoughts and actions, can be found on both sides of the debates that have sparked these tensions? Why should either of you hold onto your opinions so firmly that you can't consider the perspectives of the other?"

"I could, and indeed was about to add more on this interesting subject, but will forbear, at least for the present, after expressing a wish that the cup which has been presented to us may not be snatched from our lips by a discordance of action, when I am persuaded there is no discordance in your views. I have a great, a sincere esteem and regard for you both; and ardently wish that some line could be marked out by which both of you could walk."

"I could, and was about to, share more about this interesting topic, but I’ll hold off for now, after expressing a hope that the opportunity we've been given won't be taken away by any disagreement in our actions, especially since I believe there isn't any disagreement in your perspectives. I have a lot of genuine respect and affection for both of you, and I truly hope a path can be established that you can both follow."

These earnest endeavours to sooth the angry passions, and to conciliate the jarring discords of the cabinet, were unsuccessful. The hostility which was so much and so sincerely lamented sustained no diminution, and its consequences became every day more diffusive.

These sincere efforts to calm the angry emotions and to resolve the conflicting disagreements in the cabinet didn't work. The hostility that was so deeply and genuinely mourned showed no signs of decreasing, and its effects became more widespread every day.

Among the immediate effects of these internal dissensions, was the encouragement they afforded to a daring and criminal resistance which was made to the execution of the laws imposing a duty on spirits distilled within the United States.

Among the immediate effects of these internal conflicts was the encouragement they gave to bold and illegal resistance against the enforcement of laws that imposed a tax on spirits distilled within the United States.

To the inhabitants of that part of Pennsylvania which lies west of the Alleghany mountains, this duty was, from local considerations, peculiarly odious; nor was their hostility to the measure diminished by any affection for the source in which it originated. The constitution itself had encountered the most decided opposition from that part of the state; and that early enmity to the government which exerted every faculty to prevent its adoption, had sustained no abatement. Its measures generally, and the whole system of finance particularly, had been reprobated with peculiar bitterness by many of the most popular men of that district. With these dispositions, a tax law, the operation of which was extended to them, could not be favourably received, however generally it might be supported in other parts of the union. But when, to this pre-existing temper, were superadded the motives which arose from perceiving that the measure was censured on the floor of congress as unnecessary and tyrannical; that resistance to its execution was treated as probable; that a powerful and active party, pervading the union, arraigned with extreme acrimony the whole system of finance as being hostile to liberty; and, with all the passionate vehemence of conviction, charged its advocates with designing to subvert the republican institutions of America; we ought not to be surprised that the awful impressions, which usually restrain combinations to resist the laws, were lessened; and that the malcontents were emboldened to hope that those combinations might be successful.

To the residents of that part of Pennsylvania west of the Allegheny mountains, this responsibility felt particularly burdensome due to local issues, and their opposition to the measure wasn't softened by any fondness for its origin. The constitution itself faced strong opposition from that region, and the early resentment towards the government, which had tried hard to block its adoption, hadn't faded. Many of the most popular figures in that area harshly criticized its measures, especially the entire financial system. Given these sentiments, a tax law that affected them couldn't be welcomed, even if it was generally accepted elsewhere in the country. But when you add to this existing attitude the factors of seeing Congress critique the measure as unnecessary and oppressive, the likelihood of resistance to its enforcement being discussed, and a strong and active faction throughout the union vehemently condemning the entire financial system as anti-liberty, calling its supporters out for trying to undermine America's republican institutions, it's not surprising that the usual fears that typically prevent people from resisting laws were diminished; and the dissenters felt encouraged to believe that their efforts could succeed.

Opposition to the excise law.

Some discontents had been manifested in several parts of the union on the first introduction of the act; but the prudence and firmness of the government and its officers had dissipated them; and the law had been carried into general operation. But in the western district of Pennsylvania, the resistance wore the appearance of system, and was regularly progressive. In its commencement, it manifested itself by the circulation of opinions calculated to increase the odium in which the duty was held, and by endeavours to defeat its collection by directing the public resentments against those who were inclined either to comply with the law, or to accept the offices through which it was to be executed. These indications of ill temper were succeeded by neighbourhood meetings, in which resolutions of extreme violence were adopted, and by acts of outrage against the persons of revenue officers. At length, in September, 1791, a meeting of delegates from the malcontent counties was held at Pittsburg, in which resolutions were adopted breathing the same spirit with those which had previously been agreed to in county assemblies. Unfortunately, the deputy marshal, who was entrusted with the process against those who had committed acts of violence on the persons of revenue officers, was so intimidated by the turbulent spirit which was generally displayed, that he returned without performing his duty; and thus added to the confidence felt by the disaffected in their strength. Appearances were such as to justify apprehensions, that the judiciary would be found unable to punish the violators of the laws; and the means of obtaining aid from the executive had not been furnished by the legislature. This state of things was the more embarrassing, because the prejudices which had been widely disseminated, and the misconceptions of the act which had been extensively diffused, authorized some fears respecting the support which the law, while yet in the infancy of its operation, would receive from the people. These considerations, added to that repugnance which was felt by the government to the employment of harsh means, induced a forbearance to notice further these riotous proceedings, until the measure, by being carried into full effect in other parts of the union, should be better understood; and until congress should assemble, and modify the system in such a manner as to remove any real objections to it, the existence of which might be suggested by experience. Accordingly, in the legislature which convened in October, 1791, this subject was taken up in pursuance of the recommendation of the President, and an amendatory act was passed in May, 1792, in which the whole system was revised, and great pains were taken to alter such parts of it as could be deemed exceptionable.

Some discontent had been evident in various parts of the union when the act was first introduced, but the government and its officials handled it with prudence and firmness, which helped to resolve those issues, and the law was generally put into effect. However, in the western district of Pennsylvania, the resistance appeared organized and was steadily increasing. Initially, it showed up as the spread of opinions aimed at fueling negative feelings about the duty, and attempts to hinder its collection by turning public anger against those willing to comply with the law or take on the roles required for its enforcement. These signs of unrest were followed by community meetings where extreme resolutions were adopted, along with acts of violence against revenue officers. Eventually, in September 1791, a meeting of delegates from the discontented counties was held in Pittsburgh, where resolutions were adopted that echoed those previously agreed upon in county assemblies. Unfortunately, the deputy marshal, who was responsible for taking action against individuals who had violently targeted revenue officers, was so intimidated by the general upheaval that he returned without fulfilling his duty, further boosting the confidence of the dissatisfied in their perceived strength. Conditions arose that justified concerns that the judiciary might be unable to punish those violating the laws; moreover, the legislature had not provided means to seek assistance from the executive. This situation was particularly challenging due to the widespread prejudices and misconceptions about the act that had taken hold, raising fears about the law's support from the public while it was still in its early stages. These factors, along with the government’s reluctance to use harsh measures, led to a decision to refrain from further addressing these riotous activities until the law could be fully implemented in other parts of the union and better understood, and until Congress could meet to revise the system to eliminate any valid objections that might arise from experience. Consequently, when the legislature reconvened in October 1791, the topic was addressed following the President's recommendation, and an amendatory act was passed in May 1792, revising the entire system and making significant changes to the parts considered problematic.

This conciliatory measure did not produce the desired effect. No abatement took place in the violence and outrage with which the resistance to the law was conducted. To carry it into execution, officers of inspection were necessary in every county. The malcontents, for a considerable time, deterred every person from consenting to permit an office to be held at his house; and when at length this difficulty was supposed to be overcome, those who had been prevailed on to accede to the propositions of the supervisor in this respect, were compelled, by personal violence, and by threats of the destruction of property, and even of death, to retract the consent they had given.

This conciliatory measure didn’t have the desired effect. There was no reduction in the violence and outrage with which the resistance to the law was carried out. To implement it, inspection officers were needed in every county. The dissenters, for a long time, scared everyone away from agreeing to let an office be held at their house; and when it finally seemed that this issue was resolved, those who had been convinced to agree to the supervisor’s proposals were forced, through personal violence and threats of property destruction and even death, to take back their consent.

A meeting was again convened at Pittsburg, in which, among other very exceptionable resolutions, committees were established to correspond with any committees of a similar nature that might be appointed in other parts of the United States. By this meeting it was declared, that they would persist in every legal measure to obstruct the execution of the law, and would consider those who held offices for the collection of the duty as unworthy of their friendship; that they would have no intercourse or dealings with them; would withdraw from them every assistance, and withhold all the comforts of life which depend upon those duties which, as men and fellow citizens, they owed to each other; and would, upon all occasions, treat them with contempt. It was at the same time earnestly recommended to the people at large to adopt the same line of conduct.

A meeting was held again in Pittsburgh, where among other very objectionable resolutions, committees were formed to communicate with any similar committees that might be set up in other parts of the United States. This meeting declared that they would continue to take every legal action to block the enforcement of the law and would see anyone holding office for collecting the duty as unworthy of their friendship; they would have no interaction or business with them, would withdraw all support, and deny them all the comforts of life that depend on the duties they owed to one another as people and fellow citizens; and would, at all times, treat them with contempt. It was also strongly urged that the general public adopt the same approach.

President's proclamation.

No man could be more sensible than the President of the dangerous tendency of these measures, nor more indignant at the outrage thus offered to the government of the United States. But his prudence, and his high respect for the laws restrained him within the narrow limits which the legislature had prescribed. A proclamation[63] was issued exhorting and admonishing all persons to desist from any combinations or proceedings whatsoever, tending to obstruct the execution of the laws, and requiring the interference of the civil magistrate; and prosecutions against the offenders were directed to be instituted in every case in which they could be supported.

No one understood the serious risks of these actions better than the President, nor was anyone more outraged by the disrespect shown to the government of the United States. However, his caution and deep respect for the law kept him within the strict boundaries set by the legislature. A proclamation[63] was issued urging and warning everyone to stop any actions or gatherings that might hinder the enforcement of the laws, and it called for the involvement of law enforcement; prosecutions against those who broke the law were ordered in every case where there was enough evidence to support them.

This proclamation produced no salutary effect. Many of the civil magistrates were themselves concerned in stimulating the excesses they were required to suppress; and those who had not embarked in the criminal enterprise, found themselves totally unable to maintain the sovereignty of the laws.

This announcement had no positive impact. Many of the local officials were actually involved in encouraging the very excesses they were supposed to control; and those who hadn’t participated in the illegal activities found themselves completely unable to uphold the law.

With a laudable solicitude to avoid extremities, the government still sought for means to recall these misguided people to a sense of duty, without the employment of a military force. To obtain this desirable object, the following system was digested and pursued:

With a commendable concern to avoid extremes, the government still looked for ways to bring these misguided people back to a sense of duty, without using military force. To achieve this goal, the following system was developed and implemented:

Prosecutions were instituted against delinquents in those cases in which it was believed that they could be maintained. The spirits distilled in the non-complying counties were intercepted on their way to market, and seized by the officers of the revenue; and the agents for the army were directed to purchase only those spirits on which the duty had been paid. By thus acting on the interests of the distillers, the hope was indulged that they might be induced to comply with the law. Could they have obeyed their wishes, these measures would have produced the desired effect; but they were no longer masters of their own conduct. Impelled by a furious multitude, they found it much more dangerous to obey the laws than to resist them. The efficacy of this system too was diminished by a circumstance, which induced the necessity of a second application to the legislature. The act had not been extended to the territory north-west of the Ohio, in which great part of the army lay; and the distillers eluded the vigilance of the government by introducing their spirits into that territory.

Prosecutions were launched against offenders in cases where it was thought they could succeed. The spirits produced in the non-compliant counties were intercepted on their way to market and confiscated by tax officers; the army's agents were instructed to buy only those spirits on which the tax had been paid. By focusing on the distillers' interests, there was hope that they might be persuaded to follow the law. If they could have met these expectations, the measures would have had the intended effect, but they were no longer in control of their actions. Driven by a furious crowd, they found it much more dangerous to follow the laws than to defy them. The effectiveness of this system was further reduced by a situation that necessitated a second appeal to the legislature. The law had not been applied to the territory northwest of the Ohio, where a significant portion of the army was stationed, and the distillers evaded government scrutiny by smuggling their spirits into that area.

While from causes which were incessant and active in their operation, some of which seem too strongly fixed in the human mind ever to be removed, a broad foundation was thus laid for those party struggles whose fury is generally proportioned to the magnitude of the objects to be attained, and to the means which may be employed in attaining them, the external affairs of the United States sustained no material change.

While continuous and active forces were at play, some of which seem too deeply ingrained in human nature to ever be changed, a solid basis was established for the intense party conflicts that usually match the significance of the goals to be achieved and the methods used to achieve them, the external affairs of the United States did not experience any significant change.

Of the good understanding which was preserved with France, a fresh proof had been recently given by the employment of Mr. Ternan, a person peculiarly acceptable to the American government, to succeed the Count de Moustiers, as minister plenipotentiary of his Most Christian Majesty; and in turn, Mr. Gouverneur Morris, who was understood to have rendered himself agreeable to the French government, was appointed to represent the United States at the court of Versailles.

Of the strong relationship that was maintained with France, a recent example was the appointment of Mr. Ternan, a person particularly favored by the American government, to replace Count de Moustiers as minister plenipotentiary for his Most Christian Majesty. In turn, Mr. Gouverneur Morris, who was known to have made a positive impression on the French government, was appointed to represent the United States at the court of Versailles.

In addition to these interchanges of civility, a melancholy occasion had presented itself for giving much more substantial evidence of the alacrity with which the American administration would embrace any proper opportunity of manifesting its disposition to promote the interests of France.

In addition to these polite exchanges, a sad occasion had come up that allowed for much stronger proof of how eager the American administration was to take advantage of any proper opportunity to show its willingness to support the interests of France.

Insurrection and massacre in the island of St. Domingo.

Early and bitter fruits of that malignant philosophy, which, disregarding the actual state of the world, and estimating at nothing the miseries of a vast portion of the human race, can coolly and deliberately pursue, through oceans of blood, abstract systems for the attainment of some fancied untried good, were gathered in the French West Indies. Instead of proceeding in the correction of any abuses which might exist, by those slow and cautious steps which gradually introduce reform without ruin, which may prepare and fit society for that better state of things designed for it; and which, by not attempting impossibilities, may enlarge the circle of happiness, the revolutionists of France formed the mad and wicked project of spreading their doctrines of equality among persons, between whom distinctions and prejudices exist to be subdued only by the grave. The rage excited by the pursuit of this visionary and baneful theory, after many threatening symptoms, burst forth on the 23d day of August 1791, with a fury alike destructive and general. In one night, a preconcerted insurrection of the blacks took place throughout the colony of St. Domingo; and the white inhabitants of the country, while sleeping in their beds, were involved in one indiscriminate massacre, from which neither age nor sex could afford an exemption. Only a few females, reserved for a fate more cruel than death, were intentionally spared; and not many were fortunate enough to escape into the fortified cities. The insurgents then assembled in vast numbers, and a bloody war commenced between them and the whites inhabiting the towns. The whole French part of the island was in imminent danger of being totally lost to the mother country. The minister of his Most Christian Majesty applied to the executive of the United States for a sum of money which would enable him to preserve this valuable colony, to be deducted out of the debt to his sovereign; and the request was granted in a manner evincing the interest taken by the administration in whatever might concern France.

Early and harsh consequences of that harmful philosophy, which ignores the actual state of the world and pays no attention to the suffering of a large part of humanity, can calmly and deliberately chase after abstract concepts to achieve some imagined untested good, were seen in the French West Indies. Instead of addressing any existing abuses through careful and gradual reform that could prepare and adapt society for a better future, the revolutionaries in France devised a crazy and wicked plan to spread their ideas of equality among people who had deep-seated distinctions and prejudices that could only be resolved through death. The anger sparked by the pursuit of this harmful and unrealistic theory, after many warning signs, erupted on August 23, 1791, with widespread and devastating force. In one night, a coordinated uprising by the black population took place across the colony of St. Domingo; the white residents, while sleeping in their beds, were caught in a massive massacre that spared neither age nor gender. Only a few women, set aside for a fate worse than death, were deliberately spared, and not many managed to escape to the fortified cities. The insurgents then gathered in large numbers, starting a bloody conflict between them and the white inhabitants of the towns. The entire French part of the island faced the serious threat of being entirely lost to the home country. The minister of His Most Christian Majesty requested funding from the United States to help him save this valuable colony, to be deducted from the debt owed to his king; and the request was granted, showing the administration's interest in matters concerning France.

On the part of Spain, a desire had been expressed to adjust the subjects in controversy between the two nations by negotiations to be carried on at Madrid; and Mr. Carmichael, and Mr. Short, had been appointed commissioners, with powers equal to the object. In the mean time, the officers of that nation persisted in measures which were calculated to embroil the United States with the southern Indians. By their intrigues with the Creeks, the treaty formed in 1790 with M'Gillivray, was prevented from being ratified, and the boundary line then agreed upon was not permitted to be run. The indefinite claim of territory set up by Spain was alleged to constitute a sufficient objection to any new line of demarcation, until that claim should be settled; and her previous treaties and relations with the Creeks were declared to be infringed by their stipulation, acknowledging themselves to be under the protection of the United States.

On Spain's part, there was a desire to resolve the disputes between the two nations through negotiations in Madrid; Mr. Carmichael and Mr. Short were appointed as commissioners, empowered to achieve this goal. Meanwhile, the officials from Spain continued actions that threatened to involve the United States with the southern Indians. Their dealings with the Creeks prevented the treaty established in 1790 with M'Gillivray from being ratified, and the agreed-upon boundary line was not allowed to be established. Spain's vague territorial claims were presented as a valid reason against setting any new boundary line until those claims were addressed; additionally, previous treaties and relations with the Creeks were claimed to be violated by their agreement to recognize themselves as under the protection of the United States.

An official diplomatic intercourse had at length been opened with Great Britain also. Mr. Hammond, the minister plenipotentiary of that nation to the United States, arrived at Philadelphia in the autumn of 1791; upon which, Mr. Thomas Pinckney, a gentleman of South Carolina, who was highly and justly respected, had been charged with the interests of his country at the court of London.[64] Soon after the arrival of Mr. Hammond, the non-execution of the treaty of peace became the subject of a correspondence between him and the secretary of state, in which the complaints of their respective nations were urged in terms manifesting clearly the sense entertained by each of the justice of those complaints, without furnishing solid ground for the hope that they would be immediately removed on either side.

An official diplomatic exchange had finally begun with Great Britain as well. Mr. Hammond, the minister plenipotentiary from that nation to the United States, arrived in Philadelphia in the fall of 1791. Following this, Mr. Thomas Pinckney, a highly respected gentleman from South Carolina, was appointed to represent his country at the court in London.[64] Shortly after Mr. Hammond's arrival, the failure to implement the peace treaty became a topic of correspondence between him and the Secretary of State. In this exchange, both nations expressed their grievances in a way that clearly reflected their respective views on the justice of these complaints, yet there was little indication that any of these issues would be resolved soon on either side.

Mr. Hammond's powers on the subject of a commercial treaty were far from being satisfactory. To the inquiries of Mr. Jefferson on this point, he replied, that he was authorized to enter into a negotiation respecting the commercial intercourse between the two countries, and to discuss those principles which might serve as a basis for a treaty, but not to conclude any definitive arrangements. In fact, there was much reason to believe that the obstacles to a commercial treaty between the two countries would not be soon or easily surmounted. In America, such an alteration in the law of nations as would permit the goods of an enemy to pass freely in the bottom of a neutral, was a favourite project; and a full participation of the colonial trade was also most earnestly desired. That the latter of these objects would not be readily conceded by Great Britain did not admit of a doubt; but many intelligent men, possessing great political influence, had embraced the opinion that she could be forced out of that colonial system which every European power having settlements in America had adopted, by regulations restricting her navigation and commerce with the United States. To those who entertained this opinion, no commercial treaty could be acceptable, which did not contain the concessions they required.

Mr. Hammond's authority regarding a commercial treaty was not satisfactory. In response to Mr. Jefferson's questions about this, he stated that he was allowed to negotiate over trade between the two countries and discuss the principles that could establish a treaty, but he could not finalize any formal agreements. There was a strong belief that the challenges to a commercial treaty between the two nations would not be resolved quickly or easily. In America, there was a popular idea of changing international law to allow enemy goods to pass freely on neutral ships, and there was also a strong desire for full access to colonial trade. It was clear that Great Britain would not readily agree to the latter, but many knowledgeable individuals with significant political influence believed she could be pushed away from the colonial system that all European powers with territories in America had adopted, through regulations limiting her trade and navigation with the United States. For those who held this view, no commercial treaty would be acceptable unless it included the concessions they sought.

In addition to a general knowledge of the sentiments of the British cabinet on these points, particular evidence had lately been received of its positive decision respecting them. A comprehensive report on American affairs had been made to the privy council by a committee of that body, which was laid before the king. A few copies of it had been printed for the members of the cabinet, which were soon called in by a sudden order of council; but one of these copies was obtained, and transmitted to the secretary of state of the United States. This report manifested a willingness to form a commercial treaty with the American government on principles of perfect equality, both with respect to navigation and commerce, so far as regarded the dominions of his Britannic Majesty in Europe; but it also discovered a determination, to adhere inflexibly to the existing regulations for the colonies; and to reject the principle that free bottoms make free goods.

In addition to having a general understanding of the British cabinet's feelings on these issues, specific evidence had recently come in about its firm decision regarding them. A detailed report on American affairs had been presented to the privy council by a committee, which was then submitted to the king. A few copies of this report were printed for cabinet members, but they were quickly recalled by an urgent council order; however, one of those copies was secured and sent to the United States Secretary of State. This report showed an openness to create a commercial treaty with the American government based on principles of complete equality concerning navigation and trade, particularly in relation to the territories of his Britannic Majesty in Europe. However, it also indicated a strong commitment to uphold the current regulations for the colonies and to reject the idea that free ships make free goods.

In this state paper the opinion was advanced, that several important articles of exportation from the United States, especially tobacco, had been peculiarly favoured in Great Britain; but that these friendly regulations were not reciprocated by America. The means of retaliating injuries which might be inflicted on British commerce were stated, but those means, it was said, ought not hastily to be adopted, the more especially, as the existing government of the United States had discovered dispositions more favourable to a liberal and fair intercourse between the two countries, than had been manifested by the respective states. For several reasons it was deemed adviseable not suddenly to disturb the existing state of things, but to regulate the trade of the two nations by a treaty, the stipulations of which should be equal, and mutually beneficial, provided such a treaty could be formed without a departure from those principles which were considered as fundamental.

In this official document, the view was presented that several key exports from the United States, particularly tobacco, had been especially favored in Great Britain; however, it was noted that these favorable conditions were not matched by America. The potential responses to any harm done to British trade were outlined, but it was emphasized that such measures should not be taken lightly, especially since the current government of the United States had shown a more positive attitude toward a liberal and fair relationship between the two countries than had been shown by the individual states. For various reasons, it was considered wise not to abruptly change the current situation, but rather to govern the trade between the two nations through a treaty, the terms of which should be equitable and mutually beneficial, as long as such a treaty could be created without straying from the principles deemed fundamental.

General Wayne appointed to the command of the army.

No abatement of hostility having taken place among the north-western Indians, the preparations for terminating the war by the sword were earnestly pressed. Major General Wayne was appointed to succeed General St. Clair, who resigned the command of the army; and the utmost exertions were made to complete it to the establishment; but the laws furnished such small inducements to engage in the service, that the highest military grades, next to that of Commander-in-chief, were declined by many to whom they were offered; and the recruiting business advanced too slowly to authorize a hope that the decisive expedition which was meditated, could be prudently undertaken in the course of the present year. Meanwhile, the public clamour against the war continued to be loud and violent. It was vehemently asserted, that if the intentions of the government respecting the savages were just and humane, those intentions were unknown to them, and that their resentments were kept up by the aggressions of whites, and by the opinion that their expulsion from the country they occupied was the object of the hostilities carried on against them. However satisfied the President might be of the fallacy of these opinions, they were too extensively maintained not to be respected, as far as was compatible with a due regard to the real interests of the nation. While, therefore, the preparations for offensive operations were hastened by a vigorous exertion of the means at the disposal of the executive, it was thought adviseable to make another effort to terminate the war by a direct communication of the pacific views of the United States.—The failure of these attempts was still less to be lamented than the fate of those who were employed in them. Colonel Harden and Major Trueman, two brave officers and valuable men, were severally despatched with propositions of peace, and each was murdered by the savages.

No reduction in hostility among the northwestern Indians had occurred, so efforts to end the war through military action were ramped up. Major General Wayne was appointed to take over from General St. Clair, who stepped down from leading the army, and every effort was made to build it up. However, the laws offered few incentives for people to join the service, leading many who were offered high military ranks, just below the Commander-in-chief, to decline. The recruiting process moved too slowly to hold out hope that the planned decisive expedition could be safely launched within the year. Meanwhile, public outcry against the war remained loud and intense. It was strongly claimed that if the government’s intentions regarding the Native Americans were fair and compassionate, those intentions were unknown to them. Many believed their anger resulted from white settlers' aggressions and the perception that the goal of the conflict was to remove them from their land. Regardless of how convinced the President might be that these beliefs were misguided, they were too widely held to ignore, at least without considering the genuine interests of the nation. Therefore, while preparations for offensive actions were quickly advanced using the resources available to the executive, it seemed wise to make one more attempt to bring the war to an end by directly communicating the peaceful intentions of the United States. The failure of these efforts was less regrettable than the fates of those sent on them. Colonel Harden and Major Trueman, two courageous and valuable officers, were separately sent with peace proposals, and each was killed by the Native Americans.

Meeting of congress.
President's speech.

On the 5th of November congress again convened. In the speech delivered at the commencement of the session, Indian affairs were treated at considerable length, and the continuance of the war was mentioned as a subject of much regret. "The reiterated endeavours," it was said, "which had been made to effect a pacification, had hitherto issued in new and outrageous proofs of persevering hostility on the part of the tribes with whom the United States were in contest.

On November 5th, Congress met again. In the speech given at the start of the session, Indian affairs were discussed in detail, and the ongoing war was mentioned with great disappointment. "The repeated efforts," it was said, "that had been made to achieve peace have so far resulted in new and shocking evidence of ongoing hostility from the tribes that the United States are in conflict with."

"A detail of the measures that had been pursued, and of their consequences, which would be laid before congress, while it would confirm the want of success thus far, would evince that means as proper and as efficacious as could have been devised, had been employed. The issue of some of them was still pending; but a favourable one, though not to be despaired of, was not promised by any thing that had yet happened."

"A detailed account of the actions taken and their outcomes would be presented to Congress. While it would confirm the lack of success so far, it would show that the most appropriate and effective methods possible had been used. The results of some of these actions were still pending; however, while a positive outcome wasn't impossible, nothing that had happened so far suggested it was likely."

That a sanction, commonly respected even among savages, had been found insufficient to protect from massacre the emissaries of peace, was particularly noticed; and the families of those valuable citizens who had thus fallen victims to their zeal for the public service, were recommended to the attention of the legislature.

That a rule, usually respected even among uncivilized people, was seen as inadequate to protect peace envoys from being slaughtered was especially noted; and the families of the valuable citizens who had become victims due to their dedication to public service were urged to receive the legislature's attention.

That unprovoked aggression had been made by the southern Indians, and that there was just cause for apprehension that the war would extend to them also, was mentioned as a subject of additional concern.

That unprovoked aggression came from the southern Indians, and there was a valid reason to worry that the war would spread to them as well, which was noted as an additional concern.

"Every practicable exertion had been made to be prepared for the alternative of prosecuting the war, in the event of a failure of pacific overtures. A large proportion of the troops authorized to be raised, had been recruited, though the numbers were yet incomplete; and pains had been taken to discipline them, and put them in a condition for the particular kind of service to be performed. But a delay of operations, besides being dictated by the measures that were pursuing towards a pacific termination of the war, had been in itself deemed preferable to immature efforts."

"Every possible effort had been made to get ready for the option of continuing the war if peaceful negotiations failed. A significant number of the troops that were approved to be raised had been recruited, although the total was still incomplete; and efforts had been made to train them and prepare them for the specific type of service needed. However, delaying operations, aside from being driven by the ongoing efforts for a peaceful end to the war, was considered better than acting too soon."

The humane system which has since been successfully pursued, of gradually civilizing the savages by improving their condition, of diverting them in some degree from hunting to domestic and agricultural occupations by imparting to them some of the most simple and useful acquisitions of society, and of conciliating them to the United States by a beneficial and well regulated commerce, had ever been a favourite object with the President, and the detailed view which was now taken of Indian affairs, was concluded with a repetition of his recommendations of these measures.

The humane approach that has since been successfully implemented involves gradually civilizing the indigenous people by improving their living conditions, shifting them from hunting to more domestic and agricultural activities by teaching them some of the basic and practical skills of society, and bringing them closer to the United States through beneficial and well-organized trade. This has always been a favored goal of the President, and the detailed overview of Native American affairs concluded with a reiteration of his recommendations for these measures.

The subject next adverted to in the speech, was the impediments which in some places continued to embarrass the collection of the duties on spirits distilled within the United States. After observing that these impediments were lessening in local extent, but that symptoms of such increased opposition had lately manifested themselves in certain places as, in his judgment, to render his special interposition adviseable, the President added,—"Congress may be assured that nothing within constitutional and legal limits which may depend on me, shall be wanting to assert and maintain the just authority of the laws. In fulfilling this trust, I shall count entirely on the full co-operation of the other departments of government, and upon the zealous support of all good citizens."

The next topic addressed in the speech was the obstacles that, in some areas, still complicated the collection of taxes on spirits produced in the United States. After noting that these obstacles were decreasing in some areas, he pointed out that there had been recent signs of increased opposition in certain places that, in his view, warranted his direct involvement. The President added, "Congress can be assured that I will do everything within my constitutional and legal authority to uphold and enforce the laws. In carrying out this responsibility, I will rely completely on the full cooperation of the other branches of government and the enthusiastic support of all good citizens."

After noticing various objects which would require the attention of the legislature, the President addressed himself particularly to the house of representatives, and said, "I entertain a strong hope that the state of the national finances is now sufficiently matured to enable you to enter upon a systematic and effectual arrangement for the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt, according to the right which has been reserved to the government. No measure can be more desirable, whether viewed with an eye to its intrinsic importance, or to the general sentiments and wish of the nation."

After noticing several issues that need the legislature's attention, the President specifically addressed the House of Representatives, saying, "I strongly hope that the national finances are now in a position that allows you to start a systematic and effective plan for regularly paying off the public debt, as the government has the right to do. There’s no action more necessary, both in terms of its inherent significance and the overall feelings and wishes of the nation."

The addresses of the two houses in answer to the speech, were, as usual, respectful and affectionate. The several subjects recommended to the attention of congress were noticed either in general terms, or in a manner to indicate a coincidence of sentiment between the legislative and executive departments. The turbulent spirit which had manifested itself in certain parts of the union was mentioned by both houses with a just degree of censure, and the measures adopted by the President, as well as the resolution he expressed to compel obedience to the laws, were approved; and the house of representatives, in the most unqualified terms, declared opinions in favour of systematic and effectual arrangements for discharging the public debt. But the subsequent proceedings of the legislature did not fulfil the expectations excited by this auspicious commencement of the session.

The addresses from the two houses in response to the speech were, as usual, respectful and warm. The various topics put forward for Congress's attention were addressed either generally or in a way that showed agreement between the legislative and executive branches. The unrest that had appeared in certain areas of the union was discussed by both houses with appropriate condemnation, and the actions taken by the President, along with his commitment to enforce the laws, were supported. The House of Representatives strongly stated their opinions in favor of organized and effective plans for paying off the public debt. However, the later actions of the legislature did not meet the expectations raised by this promising start to the session.

At an early day, in a committee of the whole house on the President's speech, Mr. Fitzsimmons moved "that measures for the reduction of so much of the public debt as the United States have a right to redeem, ought to be adopted: and that the secretary of the treasury be directed to report a plan for that purpose."

At an early date, during a committee meeting of the entire house discussing the President's speech, Mr. Fitzsimmons proposed "that actions to reduce the portion of the public debt that the United States can legally redeem should be taken: and that the secretary of the treasury should be instructed to present a plan for this purpose."

This motion was objected to by Mr. Madison as being premature. The state of the finances, he thought, was not sufficiently understood to authorize the adoption of the measure it contemplated. The debate however soon took a different direction. That part of the resolution which proposed a reference to the secretary of the treasury was particularly opposed; and an ardent discussion ensued, in which, without much essential variation, the arguments which had before been urged on the same subject were again employed. After a vehement contest, the motion to amend the resolution by striking out the proposed reference was overruled, and it was carried in its original form.

This motion was opposed by Mr. Madison as being too early. He believed that the state of the finances was not well enough understood to justify the adoption of the proposed measure. However, the debate quickly took another turn. The part of the resolution that suggested referring the matter to the secretary of the treasury faced strong opposition; an intense discussion followed, where the arguments that had previously been made on the same topic were reiterated with little significant change. After a heated contest, the motion to amend the resolution by removing the proposed reference was overruled, and the resolution was passed in its original form.

1793

In obedience to this order, the secretary made a report, in which he proposed a plan for the annual redemption of that portion of the debt, the payment of which was warranted by the contract between the United States and their creditors. But the expenses of the Indian war rendering it, in his opinion, unsafe to rest absolutely on the existing revenue, he proposed to extend the internal taxes to pleasure horses, or pleasure carriages, as the legislature might deem most eligible. The consideration of this report was deferred on various pretexts; and a motion was made to reduce the military establishment. The debate on this subject was peculiarly earnest; and, in its progress, the mode of conducting the Indian war, the relative merits and expensiveness of militia and of regular troops, and the danger to liberty from standing armies, were elaborately discussed. It was not until the fourth of January that the motion was rejected. While that question remained undecided, the report of the secretary was unavoidably postponed, because, on its determination would depend, in the opinion of many, the necessity of additional taxes. It would seem not improbable that the opponents of the American system of finances, who constituted rather a minority of the present congress, but who indulged sanguine hopes of becoming the majority in the next, were desirous of referring every question relating to the treasury department to the succeeding legislature, in which there would be a more full representation of the people. Whatever might be the operating motives for delay, neither the extension of the law imposing a duty on spirits distilled within the United States to the territory north-west of the river Ohio, nor the plan for redeeming the public debt, which was earnestly pressed by the administration, could be carried through the present congress. Those who claimed the favour and confidence of the people as a just reward for their general attachment to liberty, and especially for their watchfulness to prevent every augmentation of debt, were found in opposition to a system for its diminution, which was urged by men who were incessantly charged with entertaining designs for its excessive accumulation, in order to render it the corrupt instrument of executive influence. It might be expected that the public attention would be attracted to such a circumstance. But when party passions are highly inflamed, reason itself submits to their control, and becomes the instrument of their will. The assertion that the existing revenues, if not prodigally or corruptly wasted, were sufficient for the objects contemplated by the President in his speech, would constitute an ample apology for the impediments thrown in the way of a system which could not be directly disapproved, and would justify a continuance of the charge that the supporters of the fiscal system were friends to the augmentation of the public debt.

In response to this order, the secretary submitted a report proposing a plan for the annual repayment of part of the debt, which was supported by the contract between the United States and its creditors. However, because the expenses of the Indian war made it unsafe to rely solely on current revenue, he suggested extending internal taxes to recreational horses or carriages, as the legislature might find most suitable. The discussion of this report was delayed for various reasons, and a motion was introduced to reduce the military establishment. The debate on this issue was particularly intense, covering the approach to the Indian war, the pros and cons of militia versus regular troops, and the risks to freedom posed by standing armies. It wasn't until January 4th that the motion was rejected. While this question remained unresolved, the discussion of the secretary's report was inevitably postponed because many believed its outcome would determine the necessity of additional taxes. It seemed likely that opponents of the American financial system, who were somewhat of a minority in the current Congress but hoped to become the majority in the next, wanted to push every treasury-related question to the next legislature, where there would be a more accurate representation of the people. Regardless of the reasons for the delays, neither the extension of the tax on spirits distilled within the United States to the territory northwest of the Ohio River nor the plan for reducing the public debt, which was strongly advocated by the administration, could pass in the current Congress. Those who sought the favor and trust of the people as a fair reward for their commitment to liberty, especially their vigilance against increasing debt, were found opposing a plan for reducing it, which was promoted by individuals frequently accused of aiming to excessively increase it to use it as a corrupt tool of executive influence. One might expect that the public would take notice of such a situation. But when party passions run high, reason often yields to them, becoming a tool of their will. The claim that the current revenues, if not wastefully or corruptly spent, were sufficient for the goals outlined by the President in his speech, served as a strong excuse for the obstacles placed in the way of a system that couldn't be directly opposed and would validate the ongoing accusation that the supporters of the fiscal system were advocates for increasing the public debt.

Soon after the motion for the reduction of the military establishment was disposed of, another subject was introduced, which effectually postponed, for the present session, every measure connected with the finances of the nation.

Soon after the motion to reduce the military establishment was taken care of, another topic was brought up, which effectively delayed, for the remainder of this session, any measures related to the nation's finances.

An act of congress, which passed on the fourth of August, 1790, authorized the President to cause to be borrowed any sum not exceeding twelve millions of dollars, to be applied in payment of the foreign debt of the United States.

An act of Congress, which was approved on August 4, 1790, allowed the President to borrow up to twelve million dollars to pay off the foreign debt of the United States.

A subsequent act, which passed on the 12th of the same month, authorized another loan not exceeding two millions, to be applied, in aid of the sinking fund, towards the extinguishment of the domestic debt.

A later law, which was approved on the 12th of the same month, allowed for another loan of up to two million, to be used to support the sinking fund for paying off the domestic debt.

A power to make these loans was delegated by the President to the secretary of the treasury by a general commission referring to the acts. This commission was accompanied by written instructions, directing the payment of such parts of the foreign debt as should become due at the end of the year 1791; but leaving the secretary, with respect to the residue, to be regulated by the interests of the United States.

A power to issue these loans was given by the President to the secretary of the treasury through a general commission related to the acts. This commission came with written instructions, directing the payment of portions of the foreign debt that would be due by the end of 1791; however, it allowed the secretary to manage the remaining debt according to the interests of the United States.

Under this commission two loans were negotiated in 1790, and others at subsequent periods.

Under this commission, two loans were arranged in 1790, along with others at later times.

As many considerations of convenience opposed such an arrangement as would appropriate all the monies arising from either of these loans to one object, to the total exclusion of the other; and no motive was perceived for thus unnecessarily fettering the operations of the treasury; each loan was negotiated under both laws; and consequently the monies produced by each were applicable to both objects, in such proportions as the President might direct. It has been already observed that his written instructions had ordered the payment of those instalments of the foreign debt which should become due before the first of January, 1792; but no further sums on that account were to be borrowed until supplemental orders to that effect should be given, unless a loan could be made on such terms as would render it advantageous to the United States to anticipate the payments to their foreign creditors. It being the opinion of both the President and secretary that the official powers of the latter authorized him to draw the monies borrowed for domestic purposes into the treasury, where they would form a part of the sinking fund, and be applicable to the objects of that fund in conformity with the laws of appropriation, no written instructions were given respecting that part of the subject; but in the progress of the business, every material step which was taken was communicated to the President, and his directions obtained upon it. While the chief magistrate remained at the seat of government, these communications were verbal; when absent, they were made by letter.

As many practical considerations opposed an arrangement that would dedicate all the money from either of these loans to one purpose, completely disregarding the other; and there was no apparent reason to unnecessarily restrict the treasury's operations; each loan was negotiated under both laws; therefore, the funds generated from each were available for both purposes, in whatever amounts the President might decide. It has already been noted that his written instructions directed the payment of those installments of the foreign debt due before January 1, 1792; however, no additional funds for that purpose were to be borrowed until further orders were given, unless a loan could be obtained on favorable terms that would allow the United States to advance payments to their foreign creditors. Both the President and the secretary believed that the secretary's official powers allowed him to transfer the funds borrowed for domestic purposes into the treasury, where they would contribute to the sinking fund and be used according to the laws of appropriation. Therefore, no written instructions were issued on that aspect; however, during the process, every significant step taken was communicated to the President, and his guidance was sought on it. While the President was at the seat of government, these communications were verbal; when he was away, they were conducted by letter.

At this period, the domestic debt bore a low price in the market, and foreign capital was pouring into the United States for its purchase. The immediate application of the sinking fund to this object would consequently acquire a large portion of the debt, and would also accelerate its appreciation. The best interests of the United States, and his own fame, thus impelling the secretary to give the operations of the sinking fund the utmost activity of which it was susceptible, he had, with the approbation of the President, directed a part of the first loan to be paid in discharge of the instalments of the foreign debt which were actually due, and had drawn a part of it into the public treasury in aid of the sinking fund.

At this time, domestic debt was selling at a low price in the market, and foreign investment was flooding into the United States to buy it. The immediate use of the sinking fund for this purpose would therefore reduce a significant portion of the debt and also boost its value. The best interests of the United States, along with his own reputation, motivated the secretary to push for the sinking fund's operations to be as active as possible. With the President's approval, he instructed that part of the first loan be used to pay off installments of the foreign debt that were due, and he had also transferred some of it to the public treasury to support the sinking fund.

In May, 1791, instructions were given to the agent of the United States in Europe, to apply the proceeds of future loans, as they should accrue, in payments to France, except such sums as should be previously and specially reserved. In the execution of these instructions, some delay intervened, which was to be ascribed, among other causes, to representations made by the French minister of marine that a plan would be adopted, to which a decree of the national assembly was requisite, for converting a large sum into supplies for St. Domingo: and to a desire on the part of the agent to settle, previously to further payments, a definitive rule by which the monies paid should be liquidated, and credited to the United States. The disordered state of French affairs protracted both the one and the other of these causes of delay, to a later period than had been expected; and, in the mean time, the secretary continued to draw into the United States such portions of these loans, as were destined to be brought in aid of the sinking fund. Such was the state of this transaction, when the commencement of those calamities, which have finally overwhelmed St. Domingo, induced the American government, on the urgent application of the French minister, to furnish supplies to that ill fated colony, in payment of the debt to France. This being a mode of payment which, to a certain extent, was desired by the creditor, and was advantageous to the debtor, a consequent disposition prevailed to use it so far as might comport with the wish of the French government; and a part of the money designed for foreign purposes, was drawn into the United States. In the course of these operations, a portion of the instalments actually due to France, had been permitted to remain unsatisfied.

In May 1791, instructions were given to the U.S. agent in Europe to use the proceeds from future loans to make payments to France, except for any amounts that should be specifically reserved. While following these instructions, there were some delays, partly due to the French Minister of Marine's suggestion that a plan requiring a decree from the National Assembly would be put in place to convert a large sum into supplies for St. Domingo. Additionally, the agent wanted to establish a clear rule for how the payments would be processed and credited to the United States before making further payments. The chaotic state of French affairs extended both of these delays longer than expected, and in the meantime, the secretary continued to bring in portions of these loans intended to support the sinking fund. This was the status of the transaction when the onset of the disasters that ultimately devastated St. Domingo prompted the U.S. government, at the urgent request of the French minister, to provide supplies to that unfortunate colony as payment for the debt to France. This method of payment was somewhat favored by the creditor and beneficial for the debtor, leading to a general inclination to use it as much as aligned with the wishes of the French government; thus, some of the funds meant for foreign purposes were redirected to the United States. During these operations, some of the installments actually owed to France were allowed to remain unpaid.

A part of the money borrowed in Europe being thus applicable to the extinguishment of the domestic debt, and a part of the domestic revenue being applicable to the payment of interest due on the loans made in Europe, the secretary of the treasury had appropriated a part of the money arising from foreign loans to the payment of interest due abroad, which had been replaced by the application of money in the treasury arising from domestic resources, to the purchase of the domestic debt.

A portion of the money borrowed in Europe was used to pay off the domestic debt, while some of the domestic revenue went towards paying the interest on the loans taken out in Europe. The secretary of the treasury had allocated part of the funds from foreign loans to cover the interest owed abroad, which was balanced out by using money from domestic resources in the treasury to buy back the domestic debt.

The secretary had not deemed it necessary to communicate these operations in detail to the legislature: but some hints respecting them having been derived either from certain papers which accompanied a report made to the house of representatives early in the session, or from some other source, Mr. Giles, on the 23d of January, moved several resolutions, requiring information, among other things, on the various points growing out of these loans, and the application of the monies arising from them, and respecting the unapplied revenues of the United States, and the places in which the sums so unapplied were deposited. In the speech introducing these resolutions, observations were made which very intelligibly implied charges of a much more serious nature than inattention to the exact letter of an appropriation law. Estimates were made to support the position that a large balance of public money was unaccounted for.

The secretary didn't think it was necessary to explain these operations in detail to the legislature. However, some information about them came from certain documents that were part of a report to the House of Representatives early in the session, or from other sources. On January 23rd, Mr. Giles proposed several resolutions that requested information on various issues related to these loans, how the funds from them were used, the unspent revenues of the United States, and where those unspent sums were kept. In the speech introducing these resolutions, comments were made that clearly suggested accusations of a much more serious nature than just not following the exact wording of an appropriation law. Estimates were provided to support the claim that a significant amount of public money was unaccounted for.

The resolutions were agreed to without debate; and, in a few days, the secretary transmitted a report containing the information that was required.

The resolutions were accepted without discussion, and within a few days, the secretary sent out a report with the needed information.

This report comprehended a full exposition of the views and motives which had regulated the conduct of the department, and a very able justification of the measures which had been adopted; but omitted to state explicitly that part of the money borrowed in Europe had been drawn into the United States with the sanction of the President.—It is also chargeable with some expressions which can not be pronounced unexceptionable, but which may find their apology in the feelings of a mind conscious of its own uprightness, and wounded by the belief that the proceedings against him had originated in a spirit hostile to fair inquiry.

This report included a thorough explanation of the views and motivations that had guided the department's actions, along with a strong justification for the measures that had been taken; however, it failed to explicitly mention that a portion of the borrowed money from Europe had been brought to the United States with the President's approval. It also contains some language that could be considered problematic, but this may be excused by the sentiments of a mind aware of its own integrity and hurt by the belief that the actions against him stemmed from a bias against fair investigation.

These resolutions, the observations which accompanied them, and the first number of the report, were the signals for a combined attack on the secretary of the treasury, through the medium of the press. Many anonymous writers appeared, who assailed the head of that department with a degree of bitterness indicative of the spirit in which the inquiry was to be conducted.

These resolutions, the observations that came with them, and the first issue of the report, served as a trigger for a coordinated attack on the secretary of the treasury through the media. Numerous anonymous authors emerged, attacking the leader of that department with a level of hostility that reflected the attitude in which the investigation was to be carried out.

Resolutions implicating the secretary of the treasury rejected.

On the 27th of February, not many days after the last number of the report was received, Mr. Giles moved sundry resolutions which were founded on the information before the house. The idea of a balance unaccounted for was necessarily relinquished; but the secretary of the treasury was charged with neglect of duty in failing to give congress official information of the monies drawn by him from Europe into the United States; with violating the law of the 4th of August, 1790, by applying a portion of the principal borrowed under it to the payment of interest, and by drawing a part of the same monies into the United States, without instructions from the President; with deviating from the instructions of the President in other respects; with negotiating a loan at the bank, contrary to the public interest, while public monies to a greater amount than were required, lay unemployed in the bank; and with an indecorum to the house, in undertaking to judge of its motives in calling for information which was demandable of him from the constitution of his office; and in failing to give all the necessary information within his knowledge relative to subjects on which certain specified references had been previously made to him.

On February 27th, just a few days after the last report was received, Mr. Giles proposed several resolutions based on the information available to the house. The idea of an unaccounted balance was set aside, but the treasury secretary was criticized for neglecting his duties by not providing Congress with official information about the funds he had transferred from Europe to the United States; for violating the law from August 4th, 1790, by using part of the principal borrowed under it to pay interest; and for bringing some of that money into the United States without instructions from the President. He was also accused of straying from the President's instructions in other ways, of negotiating a loan at the bank against the public interest while more public funds than necessary sat unused in the bank, and of showing disrespect to the house by attempting to question its motives in requesting information that he was obligated to provide according to the constitution of his office, as well as for not supplying all the necessary information he had regarding subjects that had been previously referred to him.

These resolutions were followed by one, directing that a copy of them should be transmitted to the President of the United States.

These resolutions were followed by one, stating that a copy of them should be sent to the President of the United States.

The debate on this subject, which commenced on the 28th of February, was continued to the 1st of March, and was conducted with a spirit of acrimony towards the secretary, demonstrating the soreness of the wounds that had been given and received in the political and party wars which had been previously waged.[65] It terminated in a rejection of all the resolutions. The highest number voting in favour of any one of them was sixteen.

The debate on this topic, which started on February 28, continued until March 1, and was marked by bitterness towards the secretary, highlighting the deep wounds from the political battles that had taken place before. [65] It ended with all the resolutions being rejected. The highest number of votes in favor of any single resolution was sixteen.

Congress adjourns.

On the 3d of March, a constitutional period was put to the existence of the present congress. The members separated with obvious symptoms of extreme irritation. Various causes, the most prominent of which have already been noticed, had combined to organize two distinct parties in the United States, which were rapidly taking the form of a ministerial and an opposition party. By that in opposition, the President was not yet openly renounced. His personal influence was too great to be encountered by a direct avowal that he was at the head of their adversaries; and his public conduct did not admit of a suspicion that he could allow himself to rank as the chief of a party. Nor could public opinion be seduced to implicate him in the ambitious plans and dark schemes for the subversion of liberty, which were ascribed to a part of the administration, and to the leading members who had supported the measures of finance adopted by the legislature.

On March 3rd, a constitutional period for the current congress came to an end. The members left with clear signs of deep frustration. Several reasons, the most notable of which have already been mentioned, had come together to create two distinct parties in the United States, which were quickly forming into a ruling party and an opposition party. In the opposition, the President was not yet openly rejected. His personal influence was too strong to be directly challenged with an acknowledgment that he was leading their rivals; and his public actions did not allow for any doubt that he would consider himself the leader of a party. Additionally, public opinion could not be swayed to associate him with the ambitious plans and shady schemes aimed at undermining liberty, which were attributed to certain members of the administration and to the key figures who had backed the financial measures passed by the legislature.

Yet it was becoming apparent that things were taking a course which must inevitably involve him in the political conflicts which were about to take place. It was apparent that the charges against the secretary of the treasury would not be relinquished, and that they were of a nature to affect the chief magistrate materially, should his countenance not be withdrawn from that officer. It was equally apparent that the fervour of democracy, which was perpetually manifesting itself in the papers, in invectives against levees, against the trappings of royalty, and against the marks of peculiar respect[66] which were paid to the President, must soon include him more pointedly in its strictures.

Yet it was becoming clear that things were heading in a direction that would inevitably pull him into the political conflicts that were about to unfold. It was obvious that the accusations against the secretary of the treasury would not be dropped and that they could significantly impact the president if he didn’t distance himself from that official. It was also clear that the intensity of democracy, which was constantly showing up in the papers through attacks on parties, the symbols of royalty, and the special honors given to the President, would soon start to target him more directly in its criticisms.

These divisions, which are inherent in the nature of popular governments, by which the chief magistrate, however unexceptionable his conduct, and however exalted his character, must, sooner or later, be more or less affected, were beginning to be essentially influenced by the great events of Europe.

These divisions, which are part of the nature of popular governments, by which the chief official, no matter how commendable his actions or how elevated his character, will inevitably be affected to some extent, were starting to be significantly influenced by the major events in Europe.

Progress of the French revolution and its effects on parties in the United States.

That revolution which has been the admiration, the wonder, and the terror of the civilized world, had, from its commencement, been viewed in America with the deepest interest. In its first stage, but one sentiment respecting it prevailed; and that was a belief, accompanied with an ardent wish, that it would improve the condition of France, extend the blessings of liberty, and promote the happiness of the human race. When the labours of the convention had terminated in a written constitution, this unanimity of opinion was in some degree impaired. By a few who had thought deeply on the science of government, and who, if not more intelligent, certainly judged more dispassionately than their fellow citizens, that instrument was believed to contain the principles of self destruction. It was feared that a system so ill balanced could not be permanent. A deep impression was made on the same persons by the influence of the galleries over the legislature, and of mobs over the executive; by the tumultuous assemblages of the people, and their licentious excesses during the short and sickly existence of the regal authority. These did not appear to be the symptoms of a healthy constitution, or of genuine freedom. Persuaded that the present state of things could not last, they doubted, and they feared for the future.

That revolution, which has fascinated, astonished, and terrified the civilized world, was closely watched in America from the very beginning. In its early phase, there was a shared belief, along with a strong hope, that it would improve life in France, spread the blessings of liberty, and enhance human happiness. However, once the convention finished its written constitution, this consensus began to weaken. A few individuals who had deeply considered the principles of government, and who, if not more knowledgeable, certainly analyzed things more calmly than their fellow citizens, believed the document contained the seeds of its own destruction. They feared that such an unstable system wouldn’t last. The same individuals were deeply affected by the influence of the crowds on the legislature and of mobs on the executive; by the chaotic gatherings of people and their reckless behavior during the brief and troubled existence of the monarchy. These didn’t seem like signs of a healthy society or true freedom. Convinced that the current situation couldn’t endure, they were filled with doubts and anxieties about the future.

In total opposition to this sentiment was that of the public. There seems to be something infectious in the example of a powerful and enlightened nation verging towards democracy, which imposes on the human mind, and leads human reason in fetters. Novelties, introduced by such a nation, are stripped of the objections which had been preconceived against them; and long settled opinions yield to the overwhelming weight of such dazzling authority. It wears the semblance of being the sense of mankind, breaking loose from the shackles which had been imposed by artifice, and asserting the freedom, and the dignity, of his nature.

In stark contrast to this feeling was that of the public. There’s something contagious about the example of a strong and enlightened nation moving toward democracy, which captivates human thought and restricts reasoning. New ideas introduced by such a nation lose the criticisms that people had previously formed against them; established beliefs give way to the powerful influence of such impressive authority. It appears to reflect the collective understanding of humanity, breaking free from the constraints imposed by manipulation, and claiming the freedom and dignity of our nature.

The constitution of France, therefore, was generally received with unqualified plaudits. The establishment of a legislature consisting of a single body, was defended not only as being adapted to the particular situation of that country, but as being right in itself. Certain anonymous writers, who supported the theory of a balanced government, were branded as the advocates of royalty, and of aristocracy. To question the duration of the present order of things was thought to evidence an attachment to unlimited monarchy, or a blind prejudice in favour of British institutions; and the partiality of America in favour of a senate was visibly declining.

The constitution of France was broadly welcomed with enthusiastic approval. The creation of a legislature made up of a single body was justified not just as suitable for the unique situation of the country, but also as the right choice overall. Some anonymous authors who backed the idea of a balanced government were labeled as supporters of monarchy and aristocracy. To challenge the stability of the current system was seen as a sign of loyalty to absolute monarchy or a misguided affection for British institutions; meanwhile, America’s preference for a senate was clearly diminishing.

In this stage of the revolution, however, the division of sentiment was not marked with sufficient distinctness, nor the passions of the people agitated with sufficient violence, for any powerful effect to be produced on the two parties in America. But when the monarchy was completely overthrown, and a republic decreed,[67] the people of the United States seemed electrified by the measure, and its influence was felt by the whole society. The war in which the several potentates of Europe were engaged against France, although in almost every instance declared by that power, was pronounced to be a war for the extirpation of human liberty, and for the banishment of free government from the face of the earth. The preservation of the constitution of the United States was supposed to depend on its issue; and the coalition against France was treated as a coalition against America also.

In this phase of the revolution, however, people's opinions weren't strongly divided, nor were their emotions stirred up enough to create a significant impact on the two sides in America. But once the monarchy was completely overthrown and a republic was established,[67] the people of the United States seemed energized by the change, and its effects were felt throughout society. The war that various European powers were fighting against France, although largely initiated by France, was labeled as a war against human freedom and a campaign to eliminate democracy from the world. The survival of the U.S. Constitution was thought to hinge on the outcome, and the alliance against France was viewed as an alliance against America as well.

A cordial wish for the success of the French arms, or rather that the war might terminate without any diminution of French power, and in such a manner as to leave the people of that country free to choose their own form of government, was, perhaps, universal; but, respecting the probable issue of their internal conflicts, perfect unanimity of opinion did not prevail. By some few individuals, the practicability of governing by a system formed on the republican model, an immense, populous, and military nation, whose institutions, habits, and morals, were adapted to monarchy, and which was surrounded by armed neighbours, was deemed a problem which time alone could solve. The circumstances under which the abolition of royalty was declared, the massacres which preceded it, the scenes of turbulence and violence which were acted in every part of the nation, appeared to them, to present an awful and doubtful state of things, respecting which no certain calculations could be made; and the idea that a republic was to be introduced and supported by force, was, to them, a paradox in politics. Under the influence of these appearances, the apprehension was entertained that, if the ancient monarchy should not be restored, a military despotism would be established. By the many, these unpopular doubts were deemed unpardonable heresies; and the few to whom they were imputed, were pronounced hostile to liberty. A suspicion that the unsettled state of things in France had contributed to suspend the payment of the debt to that nation, had added to the asperity with which the resolutions on that subject were supported; and the French revolution will be found to have had great influence on the strength of parties, and on the subsequent political transactions of the United States.

A sincere wish for the success of the French military, or rather for the war to end without any loss of French power, and in a way that would allow the people of France to choose their own form of government, was probably shared by most. However, regarding the likely outcome of their internal struggles, there wasn't complete agreement. Some individuals thought that governing a large, populous, and military nation like France—whose customs, habits, and morals were suited to a monarchy, and which was surrounded by armed neighbors—by a republican system was a challenge that only time could resolve. The circumstances under which the monarchy was abolished, the mass killings that led up to it, and the scenes of turmoil and violence across the nation seemed to them to present a terrifying and uncertain situation, making any predictions difficult; the idea that a republic could be introduced and upheld by force struck them as a political contradiction. Due to these concerns, there was a fear that if the old monarchy wasn't restored, a military dictatorship would emerge. Many considered these unpopular doubts to be unacceptable heresies, and those few who expressed them were labeled as enemies of freedom. There was also a suspicion that the chaotic situation in France had contributed to postponing the payment of their debt, which intensified the harshness with which the resolutions on that issue were defended; the French Revolution will be seen as having a significant impact on the strength of political factions and the later political events in the United States.


NOTES.

NOTE—No. I. See Page 98.

The following is an extract from the orders of the preceding day. "The Commander-in-chief orders the cessation of hostilities between the United States of America and the king of Great Britain to be publicly proclaimed to-morrow at twelve at the new building; and that the proclamation which will be communicated herewith, be read to-morrow evening at the head of every regiment, and corps of the army; after which the chaplains with the several brigades will render thanks to Almighty God for all his mercies, particularly for his overruling the wrath of man to his own glory, and causing the rage of war to cease among the nations.

The following is an excerpt from the orders of the previous day. "The Commander-in-Chief orders the end of hostilities between the United States of America and King of Great Britain to be publicly announced tomorrow at noon at the new building; and that the proclamation, which will be provided here, be read tomorrow evening at the front of every regiment and corps in the army; after which the chaplains with the various brigades will give thanks to Almighty God for all his blessings, especially for controlling the anger of man to his own glory and bringing an end to the rage of war among the nations."

"Although the proclamation before alluded to, extends only to the prohibition of hostilities and not to the annunciation of a general peace, yet it must afford the most rational and sincere satisfaction to every benevolent mind, as it puts a period to a long and doubtful contest, stops the effusion of human blood, opens the prospect to a more splendid scene, and like another morning star, promises the approach of a brighter day than hath hitherto illuminated the western hemisphere. On such a happy day, which is the harbinger of peace, a day which completes the eighth year of the war, it would be ingratitude not to rejoice; it would be insensibility not to participate in the general felicity.

"Although the earlier proclamation only addresses the stopping of hostilities and not the announcement of a full peace, it must bring the utmost rational and genuine satisfaction to everyone who cares about the well-being of others. It puts an end to a long and uncertain struggle, halts the spilling of human blood, opens the door to a brighter future, and, like a morning star, signals the arrival of a day that promises to be better than any we've seen so far in the western hemisphere. On such a joyful day, which heralds peace and marks the completion of eight years of war, it would be ungrateful not to celebrate; it would be insensitive not to join in the shared happiness."

"The Commander-in-chief, far from endeavouring to stifle the feelings of joy in his own bosom, offers his most cordial congratulations on the occasion to all the officers of every denomination, to all the troops of the United States in general, and in particular to those gallant and persevering men, who had resolved to defend the rights of their invaded country, so long as the war should continue. For these are the men who ought to be considered as the pride and boast of the American Army; and who, crowned with well-earned laurels, may soon withdraw from the field of glory, to the more tranquil walks of civil life.

"The Commander-in-Chief, instead of trying to hide his joy, extends his warmest congratulations to all officers of every rank, to all the troops of the United States in general, and especially to those brave and determined individuals who committed to defending their invaded country for as long as the war lasts. These are the individuals who should be seen as the pride and honor of the American Army; and who, with their well-deserved accolades, may soon step away from the battlefield to enjoy a more peaceful civilian life."

"While the general recollects the almost infinite variety of scenes through which we have passed with a mixture of pleasure, astonishment and gratitude; while he contemplates the prospect before us with rapture, he can not help wishing that all the brave men (of whatever condition they may be,) who have shared in the toils and dangers of effecting this glorious revolution, of rescuing millions from the hand of oppression, and of laying the foundation of a great empire, might be impressed with a proper idea of the dignified part they have been called to act (under the smiles of Providence) on the stage of human affairs. For happy, thrice happy shall they be pronounced hereafter, who have contributed any thing; who have performed the meanest office in erecting this stupendous fabric of freedom and empire on the broad basis of independency; who have assisted in protecting the rights of human nature, and establishing an asylum for the poor and oppressed of all nations and religions. The glorious task for which we first flew to arms being thus accomplished, the liberties of our country being fully acknowledged and firmly secured by the smiles of heaven, on the purity of our cause, and on the honest exertions of a feeble people determined to be free, against a powerful nation disposed to oppress them, and the character of those who have persevered through every extremity of hardship, suffering, and danger, being immortalized by the illustrious appellation of the patriot army, nothing now remains but for the actors of this mighty scene to preserve a perfect unvarying consistency of character through the very last act; to close the drama with applause, and to retire from the military theatre with the same approbation of angels and men which has crowned all their former virtuous actions. For this purpose, no disorder or licentiousness must be tolerated: every considerate and well disposed soldier must remember, it will be absolutely necessary to wait with patience until peace shall be declared, or congress shall be enabled to take proper measures for the security of the public stores, &c. As soon as these arrangements shall be made, the general is confident there will be no delay in discharging with every mark of distinction and honour all the men enlisted for the war who will then have faithfully performed their engagements with the public. The general has already interested himself in their behalf, and he thinks he need not repeat the assurances of his disposition to be useful to them on the present and every other proper occasion. In the mean time, he is determined that no military neglects or excesses shall go unpunished while he retains the command of the army."

"While the general reflects on the nearly endless variety of experiences we've gone through with a mix of joy, surprise, and gratitude, and as he looks forward with excitement, he can't help but wish that all the brave individuals, regardless of their background, who have endured the struggles and dangers of achieving this great revolution—liberating millions from oppression and setting the groundwork for a vast empire—fully understand the important role they have played (with divine favor) in the unfolding of human events. For they will be considered truly fortunate those who have contributed anything, even the smallest effort, in building this impressive structure of freedom and empire founded on independence; who have helped protect the rights of humanity and created a refuge for the poor and oppressed people from all nations and religions. Now that the glorious mission that brought us to arms is complete, and the liberties of our country are fully recognized and securely established through the grace of heaven, based on the righteousness of our cause, and the honest efforts of a determined people set against a strong nation intent on their oppression, and the legacy of those who have endured every hardship, suffering, and danger is immortalized by the proud name of the patriot army, all that remains for the actors in this great event is to maintain a consistent character through the very last act; to end the drama with applause, and to leave the military stage with the same approval from angels and men that has honored all their previous virtuous deeds. To achieve this, no disorder or lawlessness will be tolerated: every thoughtful and well-intentioned soldier must remember that it is essential to wait patiently until peace is declared, or Congress can take the necessary steps to secure public resources, etc. Once these arrangements are in place, the general is confident there will be no delay in honorably discharging all those who have faithfully fulfilled their commitments with the public. The general has already taken an interest in their welfare, and he believes he need not restate his willingness to assist them whenever appropriate. In the meantime, he is committed to ensuring that no military negligence or excess will go unpunished while he remains in command of the army."


NOTE—No. II. See Page 106.

On his way, he stopped a few days at Philadelphia, for the purpose of settling his accounts with the comptroller. The following account of this part of his duty is extracted from Mr. Gordon; "while in the city he delivered in his accounts to the comptroller, down to December the 13th, all in his own hand writing, and every entry made in the most particular manner, stating the occasion of each charge, so as to give the least trouble in examining and comparing them with the vouchers with which they were attended.

On his way, he paused for a few days in Philadelphia to settle his accounts with the comptroller. The following account of this part of his duty is taken from Mr. Gordon: "While in the city, he submitted his accounts to the comptroller up to December 13th, all in his own handwriting, with every entry made in great detail, explaining the reason for each charge to minimize any issues in reviewing and matching them with the corresponding vouchers."

"The heads as follows, copied from the folio manuscript paper book in the file of the treasury office, number 3700, being a black box of tin containing, under lock and key, both that and the vouchers."

"The heads are as follows, copied from the folio manuscript notebook in the treasury office file, number 3700, which is a black tin box that securely holds both that and the vouchers."

 

Total of expenditures from 1775 to 1783, exclusive of provisions from commissaries and contractors, and of liquors, &c. from them and others,   3,387 14 4
Secret intelligence and service,   1,982 10 0
Spent in reconnoitring and travelling,   1,874 8 0
Miscellaneous charges,   2,952 10 1
Expended besides, dollars according to the scale of depreciation,   6,114 14 0
   
l.
———
16,311

17

1

 

"Two hundred guineas advanced to General M'Dougal are not included in the l. 1982 10 0 not being yet settled, but included in some of the other charges, and so reckoned in the general sum.

"Two hundred guineas given to General M'Dougal are not counted in the l. 1982 10 0 as they haven't been settled yet, but they are included in some of the other charges, and thus accounted for in the total amount."

"Note; 104,364, of the dollars were received after March, 1780, and although credited at forty for one, many did not fetch at the rate of a hundred for one; while 27,775 of them are returned without deducting any thing from the above account (and, therefore, actually made a present of to the public)."

"Note: 104,364 dollars were received after March 1780, and although they were credited at forty to one, many didn't sell at the rate of a hundred to one; while 27,775 of them are reported without deducting anything from the above account (and, therefore, were actually given as a gift to the public)."

 

General Washington's account from June, 1778 to the end of June, 1783,   16,311 17 1  

 

 

 

 
Expenditure from July 1, 1783, to December 13,   1,717 5 4
Added afterward from thence to December 28,   213 8 4
Mrs. Washington's travelling expenses in coming to the general and returning,   1,064 1 0
   
l.
———
19,306

11

9
 
Lawful money of Virginia, the same as Massachusetts, or sterling, l. 14,479 18 9 3-4

 

The general entered in his book—"I find upon the final adjustment of these accounts, that I am a considerable loser, my disbursements falling a good deal short of my receipts, and the money I had upon hand of my own: for besides the sums I carried with me to Cambridge in 1775, I received monies afterwards on private account in 1777, and since, which (except small sums, that I had occasion now and then to apply to private uses) were all expended in the public service: through hurry, I suppose, and the perplexity of business, (for I know not how else to account for the deficiency) I have omitted to charge the same, whilst every debit against me is here credited."

The general wrote in his book—"After going over these accounts, I've realized that I have taken a significant loss. My expenses are much lower than my earnings, along with the money I had on hand. Besides the amounts I brought with me to Cambridge in 1775, I also received money later for personal reasons in 1777 and since then, which (aside from a few small amounts I occasionally needed for personal use) was all spent on public service. I suppose due to being rushed and overwhelmed with business, (because I honestly can’t explain the shortage any other way) I forgot to list the money I received, while every charge against me is clearly recorded."

July 1st, 1783.

July 1, 1783.


NOTE—No. III. See Page 179.

The year 1784 had nearly passed away before the determination of the British cabinet not to evacuate the western posts was known to the government of the United States. In the spring of that year, General Knox, who commanded the troops still retained in the service of the United States, was directed to "open a correspondence with the Commander-in-chief of his Britannic majesty's forces in Canada, in order to ascertain the precise time when each of the posts within the territories of the United States then occupied by the British troops should be delivered up." The measures produced by this resolution exhibit a curious specimen of the political opinions on the subject of federal powers, which then prevailed in congress.

The year 1784 was almost over when the British cabinet's decision not to abandon the western posts became known to the U.S. government. In the spring of that year, General Knox, who was in charge of the U.S. troops still in service, was instructed to "establish communication with the Commander-in-chief of His Majesty's forces in Canada to find out the exact timing for the handover of each post within U.S. territories that were still occupied by British troops." The actions resulting from this decision showcase an interesting example of the political views on federal powers that were common in Congress at the time.

It being at that time believed that the British garrisons would certainly be withdrawn, it became necessary to provide for occupying the posts when surrendered, with troops belonging to the United States. A number deemed sufficient for the purpose not having been retained in service, a motion was made for raising seven hundred men, by requisitions on the states for that and other objects specified in the resolution. The power of congress to make these requisitions was seriously contested, and it was gravely urged that such a power, connected with the rights to borrow money, and to emit bills of credit, would be dangerous to liberty, and alarming to the states. The motion for raising this small number of regulars did not prevail; and an order was made that except twenty-five privates to guard the stores at fort Pitt, and fifty-five to guard those at West Point and other magazines, with a proportionable number of officers, no one to exceed the rank of captain, the troops already in service should be discharged, unless congress, before its recess, should dispose of them in some other manner. For the purpose of garrisoning the posts, seven hundred militia were required from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, who should serve twelve months. While the discussions on this subject were pending, instructions from the legislature of New York to their delegates were laid before congress, requesting that body in terms of great strength, in pursuance of the confederation, to declare the number of troops of which the garrisons of those posts which were within the limits of that state should consist. The resolutions asserted a constitutional right to demand from congress a declaration upon this point, and avowed a determination to raise the troops should such declaration be withheld. After the determination of the British government not to surrender the posts was known, the militia ordered to be raised to garrison them, who were not in actual service, were discharged.

At that time, it was thought that the British troops would definitely be pulled out, so it was necessary to prepare for occupying the posts when they were surrendered, with troops from the United States. Since a sufficient number of troops hadn’t been kept in service, a proposal was made to raise seven hundred men through requisitions on the states for that and other purposes outlined in the resolution. The authority of Congress to make these requisitions was heavily debated, and it was seriously argued that such power, along with the rights to borrow money and issue bills of credit, could threaten liberty and alarm the states. The motion to raise this small number of regular troops did not succeed; instead, an order was given that, aside from twenty-five privates to guard the supplies at Fort Pitt and fifty-five to guard those at West Point and other depots, with a proportional number of officers not exceeding the rank of captain, the existing troops should be discharged unless Congress decided otherwise before its recess. To garrison the posts, seven hundred militia were needed from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, who would serve for twelve months. While discussions were ongoing, instructions from the New York legislature to their delegates were presented to Congress, strongly requesting that body, in line with the confederation, to specify the number of troops required for the garrisons of the posts in that state. The resolutions claimed a constitutional right to demand a declaration from Congress on this issue and declared a determination to raise the troops if such a declaration was not provided. Once it became clear that the British government would not surrender the posts, the militia that had been ordered to be raised for garrison duty, who were not already serving, were discharged.


NOTE—No. IV. See Page 370.

In the formation of this treaty, a question came on to be considered and decided which involved a principle that on an after occasion, and in a different case, excited a ferment never to be forgotten by those who took an active part in the politics of the day.

In creating this treaty, a question arose that needed to be considered and decided, involving a principle that, on another occasion and in a different case, stirred up a controversy that those involved in the politics of the time would never forget.

The whole commerce of the Creek nation was in the hands of M'Gillivray, who received his supplies from a company of British merchants, free from duty, through the territories belonging to Spain. This circumstance constituted no inconsiderable impediment to the progress of the negotiation. M'Gillivray derived emoluments from the arrangement which he would not consent to relinquish; and was not without apprehensions, that Spain, disgusted by his new connexions with the United States, might throw embarrassments in the way of this profitable traffic. In addition to this consideration, it was, on the part of the United States, desirable to alter the channel through which the Indians should receive their supplies, and thereby to render them more dependent on the American government. But it would be necessary to exempt the goods designed for the Indian nation from the duties imposed by law on imported articles, and the propriety of such an exemption might well be questioned.

The entire commerce of the Creek nation was controlled by M'Gillivray, who got his supplies from a group of British merchants without having to pay duties, passing through Spanish territory. This situation created a significant obstacle to the negotiations. M'Gillivray benefited from this arrangement and was unwilling to give it up; he also feared that Spain, unhappy with his new connections to the United States, might complicate this profitable trade. Additionally, the United States wanted to change how the Indians received their supplies to make them more dependent on the American government. However, it would be necessary to exempt the goods intended for the Indian nation from the duties imposed by law on imported items, and the validity of such an exemption could certainly be questioned.

With that cautious circumspection which marked his political course, the president took this point into early consideration, and required the opinion of his constitutional advisers respecting it. The secretary of state was of opinion that the stipulation for importing his goods through the United States, duty free, might safely be made. "A treaty made by the president with the concurrence of two-thirds of the senate, was," he said, "a law of the land," and a law of superior order, because it not only repeals past laws, but can not itself be repealed by future ones. The treaty then will legally control the duty act, and the act for licensing traders in this particular instance. From this opinion there is no reason to suppose that any member of the cabinet dissented. A secret article providing for the case was submitted to the senate, and it has never been understood that in advising and consenting to it, that body was divided.

With the careful caution that characterized his political actions, the president considered this issue early on and asked for the opinions of his constitutional advisers about it. The secretary of state believed that the agreement to allow the import of goods through the United States without duties could be safely made. "A treaty made by the president with the approval of two-thirds of the senate is," he said, "a law of the land," and a law of higher authority because it not only overrides previous laws but cannot be revoked by future ones. Therefore, the treaty will legally take precedence over the duty act and the legislation concerning trader licensing in this specific case. There is no indication that any cabinet member disagreed with this opinion. A secret article addressing the situation was presented to the senate, and it has never been understood that the body was divided in advising and consenting to it.


NOTE—No. V. See Page 394.

This question was investigated with great labour, and being one involving principles of the utmost importance to the United States, on which the parties were divided, the subject was presented in all the views of which it was susceptible. A perusal of the arguments used on the occasion would certainly afford much gratification to the curious, and their insertion at full length would perhaps be excused by those who recollect the interest which at the time was taken in the measure to which they related, and the use which was made of it by the opponents of the then administration; but the limits prescribed for this work will not permit the introduction of such voluminous papers. It may, however, be expected that the outline of that train of reasoning with which each opinion was supported, and on which the judgment of the president was most probably formed, should be briefly stated.

This question was thoroughly investigated, and since it involved principles of great importance to the United States, which divided the parties, the topic was presented in every way possible. Reading the arguments put forth would definitely satisfy the curious, and including them in detail might be justified by those who remember the interest that the issue sparked at the time and how it was used by opponents of the then-current administration; however, the constraints of this work do not allow for such lengthy documents. Nonetheless, it’s reasonable to expect a brief overview of the reasoning behind each opinion and the basis on which the president likely formed his judgment.

To prove that the measure was not sanctioned by the constitution, the general principle was asserted, that the foundation of that instrument was laid on this ground, "that all powers not delegated to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states or to the people." To take a single step beyond the boundaries thus specially drawn around the powers of congress, is to take possession of a boundless field of power, no longer susceptible of definition.

To demonstrate that the measure wasn't authorized by the constitution, the main principle stated that the foundation of that document is based on the idea that "all powers not given to the United States by the constitution, nor prohibited to the states by it, are reserved for the states or the people." Taking even one step beyond the clearly defined limits of congressional powers means claiming an unlimited field of power that can no longer be defined.

The power in question was said not to be among those which were specially enumerated, nor to be included within either of the general phrases which are to be found in the constitution.

The power in question was said not to be among those that were specifically listed, nor was it included in either of the general terms found in the constitution.

The article which contains this enumeration was reviewed; each specified power was analyzed; and the creation of a corporate body was declared to be distinct from either of them.

The article that includes this list was reviewed; each specified power was analyzed; and the establishment of a corporate body was stated to be different from either of them.

The general phrases are,

The general phrases are,

1st. To lay taxes to provide for the general welfare of the United States. The power here conveyed, it was observed, was "to lay taxes," the purpose was "the general welfare." Congress could not lay taxes ad libitum, but could only lay them for the general welfare; nor did this clause authorize that body to provide for the general welfare otherwise than by laying taxes for that purpose.

1st. To impose taxes to support the general welfare of the United States. The power given here, as noted, was "to impose taxes," and the purpose was "the general welfare." Congress couldn't impose taxes ad libitum, but could only do so for the general welfare; nor did this clause allow that body to support the general welfare in any way other than by imposing taxes for that purpose.

2dly. To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the enumerated powers.

2dly. To create all laws that are necessary and appropriate for implementing the listed powers.

But they can all be carried into execution without a bank. A bank, therefore, is not necessary, and consequently not authorized by this phrase.

But they can all be put into action without a bank. A bank, therefore, is not necessary, and thus not permitted by this statement.

It had been much urged that a bank would give great facility or convenience in the collection of taxes. Suppose this were true; yet the constitution allows only the means which are necessary, not those which are convenient. If such a latitude of construction be allowed this phrase, as to give any non-enumerated power, it will go to every one; for there is no one which ingenuity may not torture into a convenience, in some way or other, to some one of so long a list of enumerated powers. It would swallow up all the list of enumerated powers, and reduce the whole to one phrase. Therefore it was that the constitution restrained them to necessary means, that is to say, to those means without which the grant of the power must be nugatory.

It has been strongly argued that a bank would greatly simplify the collection of taxes. Even if this were true, the constitution only permits means that are necessary, not just those that are convenient. If such a broad interpretation is allowed for this phrase, it could lead to any non-enumerated power being claimed, since there's no idea that cleverness can't twist into a convenience, in some way or other, to some one among the long list of enumerated powers. This would essentially absorb all the enumerated powers and reduce the whole concept to one phrase. That's why the constitution limited them to necessary means, meaning those means without which the power granted would be meaningless.

The convenience was then examined. This had been stated in the report of the secretary of the treasury to congress, to consist in the augmentation of the circulation medium, and in preventing the transportation and retransportation of money between the states and the treasury.

The convenience was then looked into. This had been mentioned in the report of the secretary of the treasury to Congress, highlighting that it involved increasing the money supply and stopping the movement of cash back and forth between the states and the treasury.

The first was considered as a demerit. The second, it was said, might be effected by other means. Bills of exchange and treasury drafts would supply the place of bank notes. Perhaps indeed bank bills would be a more convenient vehicle than treasury orders; but a little difference in the degree of convenience can not constitute the necessity which the constitution makes the ground for assuming any non-enumerated power.

The first was viewed as a disadvantage. The second, it was suggested, could be handled in other ways. Bills of exchange and treasury drafts could replace bank notes. In fact, bank bills might be a more convenient option than treasury orders; however, a slight difference in convenience does not create the necessity that the constitution requires for assuming any non-enumerated power.

Besides, the existing state banks would, without doubt, enter into arrangements for lending their agency. This expedient alone suffices to prevent the existence of that necessity which may justify the assumption of a non-enumerated power as a means for carrying into effect an enumerated one.

Besides, the current state banks would definitely make agreements to lend their services. This approach alone is enough to eliminate the existence of that necessity which could justify assuming a power that isn't listed as a way to carry out a power that is enumerated.

It may be said that a bank whose bills would have a currency all over the states, would be more convenient than one whose currency is limited to a single state. So it would be still more convenient that there should be a bank whose bills should have a currency all over the world; but it does not follow from this superior conveniency, that there exists any where a power to establish such a bank, or that the world may not go on very well without it.

It can be argued that a bank whose currency is accepted across all states would be more convenient than one that only operates within a single state. Likewise, it would be even more convenient to have a bank whose currency is accepted worldwide; however, this greater convenience doesn’t mean that there is a power anywhere to create such a bank, nor does it imply that the world can’t function quite well without it.

For a shade or two of convenience, more or less, it can not be imagined that the constitution intended to invest congress with a power so important as that of erecting a corporation.

For a bit of convenience, it’s hard to believe that the constitution meant to give congress such an important power as creating a corporation.

In supporting the constitutionality of the act, it was laid down as a general proposition, "that every power vested in a government is in its nature sovereign," and includes by force of the term, a right to employ all the means requisite and fairly applicable to the attainment of the ends of such power; and which are not precluded by restrictions and exceptions specified in the constitution, are not immoral, are not contrary to the essential ends of political society.

In defending the constitutionality of the act, it was established as a general principle that "every power held by a government is inherently sovereign," and includes, by definition, the right to use all the means necessary and appropriate to achieve the goals of that power; and those means are not limited by restrictions or exceptions outlined in the constitution, are not immoral, and do not go against the fundamental purposes of political society.

This principle, in its application to government in general, would be admitted as an axiom; and it would be incumbent on those who might refuse to acknowledge its influence in American affairs to prove a distinction; and to show that a rule which, in the general system of things, is essential to the preservation of the social order, is inapplicable to the United States.

This principle, when applied to government in general, would be accepted as a fundamental truth; and it would be up to those who refuse to recognize its impact on American matters to prove a difference; and to demonstrate that a rule which, in the overall scheme of things, is crucial for maintaining social order, does not apply to the United States.

The circumstance that the powers of sovereignty are divided between the national and state governments, does not afford the distinction required. It does not follow from this, that each of the portions of power delegated to the one or to the other, is not sovereign with regard to its proper objects. It will only follow from it, that each has sovereign power as to certain things, and not as to other things. If the government of the United States does not possess sovereign power as to its declared purposes and trusts, because its power does not extend to all cases, neither would the several states possess sovereign power in any case; for their powers do not extend to every case. According to the opinion intended to be combated, the United States would furnish the singular spectacle of a political society without sovereignty, or a people governed without a government.

The fact that the powers of sovereignty are split between the national and state governments doesn't provide the needed distinction. This doesn't mean that each part of the power given to one or the other isn't sovereign regarding its proper objects. It only means that each has sovereign power over certain matters and not others. If the government of the United States doesn't have sovereign power regarding its defined purposes and responsibilities because its power doesn't cover all cases, then the individual states wouldn't have sovereign power in any case either; their powers don't extend to every situation. According to the viewpoint being challenged, the United States would present a unique situation of a political society without sovereignty, or a people governed without a government.

If it could be necessary to bring proof of a proposition so clear as that which affirms that the powers of the federal government, as to its objects, were sovereign, there is a clause in the constitution which is decisive. It is that which declares the constitution of the United States, the laws made in pursuance of it, and the treaties made under its authority to be the supreme law of the land. The power which can create the supreme law in any case, is doubtless sovereign as to such case.

If it's necessary to provide evidence for such a clear statement that the powers of the federal government, regarding its purposes, are sovereign, there is a clause in the Constitution that settles it. It declares that the Constitution of the United States, the laws made in accordance with it, and the treaties made under its authority are the supreme law of the land. The power that can create the supreme law in any situation is undoubtedly sovereign in that situation.

This general and indisputable principle puts an end to the abstract question, whether the United States have power to erect a corporation: for it is unquestionably incident to sovereign power to erect corporations, and consequently to that of the United States, in relation to the objects intrusted to the management of the government. The difference is this: where the authority of the government is general, it can create corporations in all cases; where it is confined to certain branches of legislation, it can create corporations only in those cases.

This clear and undeniable principle settles the debate about whether the United States has the authority to create a corporation. It’s certainly a part of sovereign power to establish corporations, and that applies to the United States, regarding the responsibilities assigned to the government. The distinction is this: when the government has broad authority, it can create corporations in all situations; when its power is limited to specific areas of law, it can only create corporations in those specific situations.

That the government of the United States can exercise only those powers which are delegated by the constitution, is a proposition not to be controverted; neither is it to be denied on the other hand, that there are implied as well as express powers, and that the former are as effectually delegated as the latter. For the sake of accuracy it may be observed, that there are also resulting powers. It will not be doubted that if the United States should make a conquest of any of the territories of its neighbours, they would possess sovereign jurisdiction over the conquered territory. This would rather be a result of the whole mass of the powers of the government, and from the nature of political society, than a consequence of either of the powers specially enumerated. This is an extensive case in which the power of erecting corporations is either implied in, or would result from some or all of the powers vested in the national government.

The government of the United States can only use the powers given to it by the Constitution, and this is not up for debate. However, it's also true that there are implied powers as well as explicit ones, and the implied ones are just as valid as the explicit ones. For accuracy's sake, it's worth noting that there are also resulting powers. It's clear that if the United States were to conquer any territory from its neighbors, it would have full sovereignty over that territory. This would stem more from the collective powers of the government and the nature of political society rather than just from the specific powers listed. This is a significant case where the ability to create corporations is either implied by or would emerge from some or all of the powers granted to the national government.

Since it must be conceded that implied powers are as completely delegated as those which are expressed, it follows that, as a power of erecting a corporation may as well be implied as any other thing, it may as well be employed as an instrument or mean of carrying into execution any of the specified powers as any other instrument or mean whatever. The question in this as in every other case must be, whether the mean to be employed has a natural relation to any of the acknowledged objects or lawful ends of the government. Thus a corporation may not be created by congress for superintending the police of the city of Philadelphia, because they are not authorized to regulate the police of that city; but one may be created in relation to the collection of the taxes, or to the trade with foreign countries, or between the states, or with the Indian tribes, because it is in the province of the federal government to regulate those objects; and because it is incident to a general sovereign or legislative power to regulate a thing, to employ all the means which relate to its regulation, to the best and greatest advantage.

Since it's accepted that implied powers are just as fully delegated as expressed ones, it follows that the ability to create a corporation can be implied just like anything else. It can also be used as an instrument or means to carry out any of the designated powers, just like any other instrument or means available. The key question, as always, is whether the means being used has a natural connection to any of the recognized purposes or lawful goals of the government. For example, Congress cannot create a corporation to oversee the police in Philadelphia because they aren't authorized to manage the police there. However, they could create one for collecting taxes, for trade with foreign countries, for relations between the states, or with Indian tribes, since it's within the federal government's authority to regulate those matters. It's inherent to general sovereign or legislative power to regulate a matter, to utilize all related means in order to achieve the best and most effective outcomes.

A strange fallacy seems to have crept into the manner of thinking and reasoning upon this subject. The imagination has presented an incorporation as some great, independent, substantive thing—as a political end of peculiar magnitude and moment; whereas it is truly to be considered as a quality, capacity, or mean to an end. Thus a mercantile company is formed with a certain capital for the purpose of carrying on a particular branch of business. The business to be prosecuted is the end. The association in order to form the requisite capital is the primary mean. Let an incorporation be added, and you only add a new quality to that association which enables it to prosecute the business with more safety and convenience. The association when incorporated still remains the mean, and can not become the end.

A strange misconception seems to have entered the way of thinking and reasoning about this topic. The imagination has portrayed incorporation as some significant, independent, substantial entity—as a political goal of great importance; however, it should actually be seen as a quality, capability, or method to achieve an objective. For example, a business partnership is created with a specific capital to carry out a certain type of business. The business that is being pursued is the end. The partnership, in order to gather the necessary capital, is the primary means. When an incorporation is added, all you’re doing is introducing a new quality to that partnership that allows it to conduct the business with greater safety and convenience. The partnership, once incorporated, still remains the means, and cannot become the end.

To this reasoning respecting the inherent right of government to employ all the means requisite to the execution of its specified powers, it is objected, that none but necessary and proper means can be employed; and none can be necessary, but those without which the grant of the power would be nugatory. So far has this restrictive interpretation been pressed as to make the case of necessity which shall warrant the constitutional exercise of a power, to depend on casual and temporary circumstances; an idea, which alone confutes the construction. The expedience of exercising a particular power, at a particular time, must indeed depend on circumstances, but the constitutional right of exercising it must be uniform and invariable. All the arguments, therefore, drawn from the accidental existence of certain state banks which happen to exist to-day, and for aught that concerns the government of the United States may disappear to-morrow, must not only be rejected as fallacious, but must be viewed as demonstrative that there is a radical source of error in the reasoning.

To this reasoning about the government's inherent right to use all necessary means to carry out its specified powers, it is argued that only necessary and proper means can be used; and none can be necessary except for those without which the power granted would be useless. This restrictive interpretation has been taken so far as to make the case of necessity, which would justify the constitutional exercise of a power, rely on random and temporary situations; this idea alone disproves the argument. The appropriateness of exercising a specific power at a specific time must indeed rely on circumstances, but the constitutional right to exercise it must be consistent and unwavering. Therefore, all arguments based on the current existence of certain state banks, which might disappear tomorrow for all that matters to the government of the United States, must not only be dismissed as faulty, but must also be seen as evidence of a fundamental flaw in the reasoning.

But it is essential to the being of the government that so erroneous a conception of the meaning of the word necessary should be exploded.

But it's crucial for the functioning of the government that such a mistaken understanding of the word necessary is discarded.

It is certain that neither the grammatical nor popular sense of the term requires that construction. According to both, necessary often means no more than needful, requisite, incidental, useful, or conducive to. It is a common mode of expression to say that it is necessary for a government or a person to do this or that thing, where nothing more is intended or understood than that the interests of the government or person require, or will be promoted by doing this or that thing.

It’s clear that neither the grammatical nor everyday meaning of the term needs that interpretation. In both cases, necessary often just means needed, required, helpful, useful, or beneficial to. It’s a common way to say that it’s necessary for a government or a person to do this or that, where the only intention or understanding is that the interests of the government or person depend on, or will benefit from, doing this or that.

This is the true sense in which the word is used in the constitution. The whole turn of the clause containing it indicates an intent to give by it a liberal latitude to the exercise of the specified powers. The expressions have peculiar comprehensiveness. They are "to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by the constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or office thereof." To give the word "necessary" the restrictive operation contended for, would not only depart from its obvious and popular sense, but would give it the same force as if the word absolutely or indispensably had been prefixed to it.

This is the actual meaning intended in the constitution. The entire phrasing of the clause shows a desire to allow a broad interpretation of the specified powers. The terms used are notably inclusive. They state "to make all laws necessary and proper for implementing the previously mentioned powers, and all other powers granted by the constitution to the government of the United States, or any department or office within it." Interpreting the word "necessary" in a restrictive way as argued would not only stray from its clear and common meaning but would also equate it to if the word absolutely or indispensably was placed before it.

Such a construction would beget endless uncertainty and embarrassment. The cases must be palpable and extreme in which it could be pronounced with certainty that a measure was absolutely necessary, or one without which a given power would be nugatory. There are few measures of any government which would stand so severe a test. To insist upon it would be to make the criterion of the exercise of an implied power a case of extreme necessity; which is rather a rule to justify the overleaping the bounds of constitutional authority than to govern the ordinary exercise of it.

Such a rule would create constant uncertainty and awkwardness. There must be clear and extreme situations where it could be confidently said that a measure was absolutely necessary, or that without it, a certain power would be useless. Very few actions taken by any government would pass such a tough test. To demand this would effectively make the standard for using an implied power an extreme necessity; which serves more as a way to justify exceeding constitutional limits than to guide its usual use.

The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it. The relation between the measure and the end; between the nature of the mean employed towards the execution of a power, and the object of that power must be the criterion of constitutionality, not the more or less necessity or utility.

The extent to which a measure is necessary can never determine the legal right to implement it. The relationship between the measure and the end; between the nature of the means used to carry out a power and the objective of that power should be the standard for constitutionality, rather than the degree of necessity or utility.

The means by which national exigencies are to be provided for, national inconveniences obviated, and national prosperity promoted, are of such infinite variety, extent, and complexity, that here must of necessity be great latitude of discretion in the selection and application of those means. Hence the necessity and propriety of exercising the authority intrusted to a government on principles of liberal construction.

The ways to address national needs, eliminate national problems, and enhance national prosperity are so varied, extensive, and complex that there must be a lot of freedom in choosing and using those methods. This is why it’s necessary and appropriate to exercise the authority given to a government based on principles of broad interpretation.

While on the one hand, the restrictive interpretation of the word necessary is deemed inadmissible, it will not be contended on the other, that the clause in question gives any new and independent power. But it gives an explicit sanction to the doctrine of implied powers, and is equivalent to an admission of the proposition that the government, as to its specified powers and objects, has plenary and sovereign authority.

While the strict interpretation of the word necessary is considered unacceptable, it won't be argued that the clause in question grants any new or independent power. However, it does provide clear support for the idea of implied powers and essentially confirms that the government, in terms of its specified powers and objectives, has full and sovereign authority.

It is true that the power to create corporations is not granted in terms. Neither is the power to pass any particular law, nor to employ any of the means by which the ends of the government are to be attained. It is not expressly given in cases in which its existence is not controverted. For by the grant of a power to exercise exclusive legislation in the territory which may be ceded by the states to the United States, it is admitted to pass; and in the power "to make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property of the United States," it is acknowledged to be implied. In virtue of this clause, has been implied the right to create a government; that is, to create a body politic or corporation of the highest nature; one that, in its maturity, will be able itself to create other corporations. Thus has the constitution itself refuted the argument which contends that, had it been designed to grant so important a power as that of erecting corporations, it would have been mentioned. But this argument is founded on an exaggerated and erroneous conception of the nature of the power. It is not of so transcendent a kind as the reasoning supposes. Viewed in a just light, it is a mean which ought to have been left to implication, rather than an end which ought to have been expressly granted.

It is true that the ability to create corporations is not clearly stated in the terms. The same goes for the ability to pass any specific law or to use any of the means by which the government’s goals are to be achieved. This power isn't explicitly given in situations where its existence isn't challenged. By granting the authority to exercise exclusive legislation in the territory that may be ceded by the states to the United States, it is acknowledged that this power can be exercised. Similarly, in the power "to make all necessary rules and regulations regarding the territory or other property of the United States," it is recognized as implied. Because of this clause, the right to establish a government has been implied; that is, to create a corporation of the highest kind—one that, in its maturity, will be able to create other corporations itself. Thus, the constitution has refuted the argument that if it had meant to grant such an important power as creating corporations, it would have mentioned it directly. However, this argument is based on an exaggerated and incorrect view of the nature of the power. It is not as extraordinary as the reasoning suggests. When viewed correctly, it is a means that should have been left implied, rather than an end that should have been explicitly granted.

The power of the government then to create corporations in certain cases being shown, it remained to inquire into the right to incorporate a banking company, in order to enable it the more effectually to accomplish ends which were in themselves lawful.

The government's ability to create corporations in specific situations having been established, it was necessary to explore the right to incorporate a banking company, so that it could more effectively achieve goals that were lawful in themselves.

To establish such a right it would be necessary to show the relation of such an institution to one or more of the specified powers of government.

To establish this right, it would be necessary to demonstrate how this institution is connected to one or more of the specified powers of government.

It was then affirmed to have a relation more or less direct to the power of collecting taxes, to that of borrowing money, to that of regulating trade between the states, to those of raising, supporting, and maintaining fleets and armies; and in the last place to that which authorizes the making of all needful rules and regulations concerning the property of the United States, as the same had been practised upon by the government.

It was then confirmed to have a more or less direct connection to the ability to collect taxes, to borrow money, to regulate trade between the states, to raise, support, and maintain fleets and armies; and lastly to the authority to create all necessary rules and regulations regarding the property of the United States, as had been practiced by the government.

The secretary of the treasury next proceeded, by a great variety of arguments and illustrations, to prove the position that the measure in question was a proper mean for the execution of the several powers which were enumerated, and also contended that the right to employ it resulted from the whole of them taken together. To detail those arguments would occupy too much space, and is the less necessary, because their correctness obviously depends on the correctness of the principles which have been already stated.

The secretary of the treasury then went on to use various arguments and examples to demonstrate that the measure in question was a suitable means to execute the several powers listed, and also argued that the right to use it came from considering all of them together. Going into detail about those arguments would take too much space and isn’t really necessary, since their validity clearly relies on the accuracy of the principles that have already been laid out.


NOTE—No. VI. See Page 434.

The officer to whom the management of the finances was confided was so repeatedly charged with a desire to increase the public debt and to render it perpetual, and this charge had such important influence in the formation of parties, that an extract from this report can not be improperly introduced.

The officer responsible for managing the finances was frequently accused of wanting to increase the public debt and make it permanent, and this accusation had a significant impact on the formation of political parties, so it’s appropriate to include an excerpt from this report.

After stating the sum to be raised, the secretary says, "three expedients occur to the option of the government for providing this:

After mentioning the total amount to be raised, the secretary says, "three options come to mind for the government to provide this:

"One, to dispose of the interest to which the United States are entitled in the bank of the United States. This at the present market price of bank stock would yield a clear gain to the government much more than adequate to the sum required.

"One, to get rid of the interest that the United States holds in the Bank of the United States. At the current market price of bank stock, this would provide the government with a clear profit significantly more than enough to cover the required amount."

"Another, to borrow the money upon an establishment of funds either merely commensurate with the interest to be paid, or affording a surplus which will discharge the principal by instalments within a short term.

"Another option is to borrow money against a fund that covers either just the interest payments or provides extra to repay the principal in installments over a short period."

"The third is to raise the amount by taxes."

"The third is to increase the amount through taxes."

After stating his objections to the first and second expedients, the report proceeds thus, "but the result of mature reflection is, in the mind of the secretary, a strong conviction that the last of the three expedients which have been mentioned, is to be preferred to either of the other two.

After expressing his objections to the first and second options, the report continues, "but after careful consideration, the secretary firmly believes that the last of the three options mentioned is the best choice compared to the other two."

"Nothing can more interest the national credit and prosperity than a constant and systematic attention to husband all the means previously possessed for extinguishing the present debt, and to avoid, as much as possible, the incurring of any new debt.

"Nothing can be more important for national credit and prosperity than consistently and systematically managing all the resources previously available to eliminate the current debt, and to avoid, as much as possible, taking on any new debt."

"Necessity alone, therefore, can justify the application of any of the public property, other than the annual revenues, to the current service, or the temporary and casual exigencies; or the contracting of an additional debt by loans, to provide for those exigencies.

"Only necessity can justify using any public property, apart from the annual revenues, for current services or for temporary and unexpected situations; or taking on new debt through loans to cover those situations."

"Great emergencies indeed might exist, in which loans would be indispensable. But the occasions which will justify them must be truly of that description.

"Major emergencies might actually arise where loans are absolutely necessary. However, the situations that warrant them must genuinely fit that description."

"The present is not of such a nature. The sum to be provided is not of magnitude enough to furnish the plea of necessity.

"The present situation isn't like that. The amount needed isn't large enough to justify the claim of necessity."

"Taxes are never welcome to a community. They seldom fail to excite uneasy sensations more or less extensive. Hence a too strong propensity in the governments of nations, to anticipate and mortgage the resources of posterity, rather than to encounter the inconveniencies of a present increase of taxes.

"Taxes are never welcomed in a community. They usually create some level of discomfort among the people. As a result, governments often tend to rely on future resources instead of facing the short-term pain of raising taxes now."

"But this policy, when not dictated by very peculiar circumstances, is of the worst kind. Its obvious tendency is, by enhancing the permanent burdens of the people, to produce lasting distress, and its natural issue is in national bankruptcy."

"But this policy, when not driven by very specific circumstances, is one of the worst kinds. Its clear tendency is, by increasing the ongoing burdens on the people, to create lasting hardship, and its likely result is national bankruptcy."

It will be happy if the councils of this country, sanctioned by the voice of an enlightened community, shall be able to pursue a different course.

It will be great if the councils of this country, supported by the voice of an informed community, can take a different path.


NOTE—No. VII. See Page 450.

About the same time a letter was addressed to the attorney general on the same subject. The following extract is taken from one of the twenty-sixth of August to the secretary of the treasury.

Around the same time, a letter was sent to the attorney general on the same topic. The following excerpt is taken from one written on the twenty-sixth of August to the secretary of the treasury.

"Differences in political opinions are as unavoidable as, to a certain point, they may be necessary; but it is exceedingly to be regretted that subjects can not be discussed with temper, on the one hand, or decisions submitted to on the other, without improperly implicating the motives which led to them; and this regret borders on chagrin when we find that men of abilities, zealous patriots, having the same general objects in view, and the same upright intentions to prosecute them, will not exercise more charity in deciding on the opinions and actions of each other. When matters get to such lengths, the natural inference is that both sides have strained the cords beyond their bearing, that a middle course would be found the best until experience shall have decided on the right way; or, which is not to be expected, because it is denied to mortals, until there shall be some infallible rule by which to forejudge events.

"Differences in political opinions are as unavoidable as they are, to some extent, necessary; but it's really unfortunate that topics can't be discussed calmly on one side, or decisions accepted on the other, without wrongly questioning the motives behind them. This frustration becomes even more disappointing when we see capable individuals, passionate patriots, who share the same general goals and genuine intentions to pursue them, failing to show more understanding in evaluating each other’s opinions and actions. When things reach such extremes, the obvious conclusion is that both sides have pushed their limits too far, and that a balanced approach would be the best until experience has determined the right path; or, which is unlikely because it's beyond human reach, until there is an infallible way to predict outcomes."

"Having premised these things, I would fain hope that liberal allowances will be made for the political opinions of each other; and instead of those wounding suspicions, and irritating charges with which some of our gazettes are so strongly impregnated, and which can not fail, if persevered in, of pushing matters to extremity, and thereby tearing the machine asunder, that there might be mutual forbearance and temporising yieldings on all sides. Without these, I do not see how the reins of government are to be managed, or how the union of the states can be much longer preserved.

"With that said, I hope that we can be understanding of each other's political views. Instead of the hurtful suspicions and provocative accusations that some of our newspapers are filled with, which, if they continue, will only escalate tensions and potentially break things apart, we should practice mutual tolerance and compromise on all sides. Without this, I don't see how we can manage governance or maintain the unity of the states for much longer."

"How unfortunate would it be if a fabric so goodly, erected under so many providential circumstances, after acquiring in its first stages, so much respectability, should, from diversity of sentiment, or internal obstructions to some of the acts of government (for I can not prevail on myself to believe that these measures are as yet the acts of a determined party) be brought to the verge of dissolution. Melancholy thought! But while it shows the consequences of diversified opinions, where pushed with too much tenacity, it exhibits evidence also of the necessity of accommodation, and of the propriety of adopting such healing measures as may restore harmony to the discordant members of the union, and the governing powers of it.

"How unfortunate would it be if a great fabric, built under so many fortunate circumstances, after gaining so much respect in its early days, should, due to differing opinions or internal obstacles to some government actions (since I can't believe these measures are genuinely the actions of a determined group), be brought to the brink of collapse. It’s a sad thought! But while it highlights the consequences of differing views when held too firmly, it also shows the need for compromise and the importance of adopting healing measures that can restore harmony among the conflicting parts of the union and its governing bodies."

"I do not mean to apply this advice to any measures which are passed, or to any particular character. I have given it, in the same general terms, to other officers of the government. My earnest wish is that balm may be poured into all the wounds which have been given, to prevent them from gangrening, and to avoid those fatal consequences which the community may sustain if it is withheld. The friends of the union must wish this: those who are not, but who wish to see it rended, will be disappointed; and all things I hope will go well."

"I don't intend to apply this advice to any specific measures that have been passed or to any particular individuals. I've given it, in the same general terms, to other government officials. My sincere hope is that healing can be provided for all the wounds that have been inflicted, to stop them from getting worse, and to prevent the serious consequences that the community might face if we don't act. Supporters of the union must want this: those who don't support it and wish to see it torn apart will be let down; and I hope everything will turn out well."


NOTE—No. VIII. See Page 479.

The gazettes of the day contain ample proofs on this subject. All the bitterness of party spirit had poured itself out in the most severe invectives against the heads of the state and treasury departments.

The newspapers of the time offer plenty of evidence on this topic. All the anger of political rivalry had been unleashed in harsh attacks against the leaders of the state and treasury departments.

The secretary of the treasury was represented as the advocate of "aristocracy, monarchy, hereditary succession, a titled order of nobility, and all the other mock pageantry of kingly government." He was arraigned at the bar of the public for holding principles unfavourable to the sovereignty of the people, and with inculcating doctrines insinuating their inability to rule themselves. The theory of the British monarchy was said to have furnished his model for a perfect constitution; and all his systems of finance, which were represented as servile imitations of those previously adopted by England, were held up to public execration as being intended to promote the favourite project of assimilating the government of the United States to that of Great Britain. With this view, he had entailed upon the nation a heavy debt, and perpetual taxes; had created an artificial monied interest which had corrupted, and would continue to corrupt the legislature; and was endeavouring to prostrate the local authorities as a necessary step towards erecting that great consolidated monarchy which he contemplated.

The secretary of the treasury was seen as a supporter of "aristocracy, monarchy, hereditary succession, a titled class of nobility, and all the other superficial trappings of royal governance." He was publicly criticized for holding views that undermined the power of the people and for promoting ideas that suggested they were incapable of governing themselves. It was claimed that the British monarchy served as his model for an ideal constitution; all his financial systems, which were viewed as mere copies of those used in England, were condemned as efforts to align the government of the United States with that of Great Britain. To achieve this, he had burdened the nation with significant debt and ongoing taxes; he had created an artificial monetary interest that had corrupted, and would continue to corrupt, the legislature; and he was working to undermine local authorities as a crucial step toward establishing the unified monarchy he envisioned.

To support some of these charges, sentences and parts of sentences were selected from his reports, which expressed the valuable purposes to which a funded debt might be applied, and were alleged to affirm, as an abstract principle, "that a public debt was a public blessing." He was, it was added, the inveterate enemy of Mr. Jefferson, because, in the republican principles of that gentleman, he perceived an invincible obstacle to his views.

To back up some of these accusations, sentences and parts of sentences were taken from his reports, which detailed the beneficial ways a funded debt could be utilized, and were said to support, as a general principle, "that a public debt is a public blessing." It was also noted that he was a relentless opponent of Mr. Jefferson, because he saw Mr. Jefferson's republican principles as an unyielding barrier to his goals.

If the counter charges exhibited against the secretary of state were less capable of alarming the fears of the public for liberty, and of directing the resentments of the people against that officer as the enemy of their rights, they were not less calculated to irritate his personal friends, and to wound his own feelings.

If the allegations made against the secretary of state were not as likely to stir up public fears about freedom and turn people's anger towards him as the enemy of their rights, they were still likely to upset his personal friends and hurt his feelings.

The adversaries of this gentleman said, that he had been originally hostile to the constitution of the United States, and adverse to its adoption; and "that his avowed opinions tended to national disunion, national insignificance, public disorder, and discredit." Under the garb of democratic simplicity, and modest retiring philosophy, he covered an inordinate ambition which grasped unceasingly at power, and sought to gratify itself, by professions of excessive attachment to liberty, and by traducing and lessening in the public esteem, every man in whom he could discern a rival. To this aspiring temper they ascribed, not only "those pestilent whispers which, clandestinely circulating through the country, had, as far as was practicable, contaminated some of its fairest and worthiest characters," but also certain publications affecting the reputation of prominent individuals whom he might consider as competitors with himself for the highest office in the state. A letter written by Mr. Jefferson to a printer, transmitting for publication the first part of "the rights of man," which letter was prefixed to the American edition of that pamphlet, contained allusions to certain "political heresies" of the day, which were understood to imply a serious censure on the opinions of the vice president: and the great object of the national gazette, a paper known to be edited by a clerk in the department of state, was "to calumniate and blacken public characters, and, particularly, to destroy the public confidence in the secretary of the treasury, who was to be hunted down for the unpardonable sin of having been the steady and invariable friend of broad principles of national government." It was also said that his connexions with this paper, and the patronage he afforded it, authorized the opinion that it might fairly be considered "the mirror of his views," and thence was adduced an accusation not less serious in its nature than that which has been already stated.

The opponents of this man claimed that he had initially been against the Constitution of the United States and opposed to its adoption, arguing that "his open opinions led to national disunion, insignificance, public disorder, and discredit." Under the guise of straightforward democracy and modest philosophy, he hid an excessive ambition that constantly reached for power and sought to satisfy itself by professing an extreme love for liberty while tarnishing the public image of anyone he saw as a rival. They attributed not only "those harmful whispers that, secretly spreading through the country, had, as much as possible, tainted some of its most admirable and deserving individuals," but also certain publications targeting the reputations of prominent figures who might be seen as competition for the highest office in the government. A letter written by Mr. Jefferson to a printer, sending for publication the first part of "the rights of man," which was prefixed to the American edition of that pamphlet, referred to certain "political heresies" of the time, interpreted as serious criticism of the vice president’s views. The main goal of the national gazette, a known publication edited by a state department clerk, was "to slander and tarnish public figures, especially to undermine public confidence in the secretary of the treasury, who was to be despised for the unforgivable sin of being a consistent supporter of broad national government principles." It was also said that his connections with this paper and the support he provided it justified the belief that it could rightly be seen as "a reflection of his views," leading to an accusation no less serious than the one already mentioned.

The national gazette was replete with continual and malignant strictures on the leading measures of the administration, especially those which were connected with the finances. "If Mr. Jefferson's opposition to these measures had ceased when they had received the sanction of law, nothing more could have been said than that he had transgressed the rules of official decorum in entering the lists with the head of another department, and had been culpable in pursuing a line of conduct which was calculated to sow the seeds of discord in the executive branch of the government in the infancy of its existence. But when his opposition extended beyond that point, when it was apparent that he wished to render odious, and of course to subvert (for in a popular government these are convertible terms) all those deliberate and solemn acts of the legislature which had become the pillars of the public credit, his conduct deserved to be regarded with a still severer eye." It was also said to be peculiarly unfit for a person remaining at the head of one of the great executive departments, openly to employ all his influence in exciting the public rage against the laws and the legislature of the union, and in giving circulation to calumnies against his colleagues in office, from the contamination of which the chief magistrate himself could not hope entirely to escape.

The national newspaper was full of ongoing and harmful criticisms of the main actions of the administration, especially those related to finances. "If Mr. Jefferson's opposition to these measures had stopped once they became law, all that could be said is that he had breached the standards of official conduct by challenging the head of another department and acted wrongly by engaging in behavior that could create conflict within the executive branch of the government while it was still new. But when his opposition went further, making it clear that he wanted to make them look bad, and thus to undermine (since in a democratic government these terms are interchangeable) all those careful and serious acts of the legislature that had become the foundation of public trust, his actions warranted even stricter scrutiny." It was also said to be especially inappropriate for someone in charge of a major executive department to openly use all their influence to incite public anger against the laws and the legislature of the union, and to spread slander against their colleagues in office, from which the president himself couldn't expect to be completely free.


END OF VOLUME IV.


FOOTNOTES

[1] Higher up, this river is called the Catawba.

[1] Further upstream, this river is known as the Catawba.

[2] This account of the battle of Hobkirk's Hill varies in several particulars from that contained in the first edition. In making the alteration the author has followed the letter of General Davie, published in Mr. Johnson's biography of General Greene. General Davie was known to the author to be a gentleman in whose representations great confidence is to be placed on every account, and his situation in the army enabled him to obtain the best information.

[2] This account of the battle of Hobkirk's Hill differs in several ways from what’s in the first edition. In making the changes, the author has relied on the letter from General Davie, which was published in Mr. Johnson's biography of General Greene. The author considered General Davie to be a gentleman whose insights were highly trustworthy for various reasons, and his position in the army allowed him to gather the most accurate information.

[3] There is some variance between this statement and that which has been made by Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Gordon, although their estimates are supposed to have been formed on the same document—the field return made by the adjutant general of the southern army, dated the 26th of April. This return contains a column of the present fit for duty, and also exhibits the killed, wounded, and missing, but contains no column of total numbers. Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Gordon are supposed to have taken the column of present fit for duty as exhibiting the strength of the army on the day of the battle; but as this return was made the day after the action, the author has supposed that the killed, wounded, and missing, must be added to the numbers fit for duty on the day of the return, to give the actual strength of the army at the time of the engagement.

[3] There's some difference between this statement and what Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Gordon have said, even though they based their estimates on the same document—the field report from the adjutant general of the southern army, dated April 26th. This report includes a column for those currently fit for duty and also shows the killed, wounded, and missing, but it doesn't have a column for total numbers. Mr. Ramsay and Mr. Gordon are thought to have used the current fit for duty column to represent the army's strength on the day of the battle; however, since this report was filed the day after the fight, the author believes that the killed, wounded, and missing numbers should be added to those fit for duty on the day of the report to reflect the army's true strength during the engagement.

[4] Mr. Johnson states that Captain M'Cauley, of South Carolina, had joined Armstrong and Carrington. Some of the troopers were killed on the bridge.

[4] Mr. Johnson says that Captain M'Cauley from South Carolina joined Armstrong and Carrington. Some of the soldiers were killed on the bridge.

[5] The execution of Colonel Hayne has been generally ascribed to Lord Rawdon, and that gallant nobleman has been censured throughout America for an act which has been universally execrated. A letter addressed by him to the late General Lee, on receiving the memoirs of the southern war, written by that gentleman, which has been published in the "View of the Campaign of 1781, in the Carolinas, by H. Lee," gives the British view of that transaction, and exonerates Lord Rawdon from all blame. Lieutenant Colonel Balfour commanded, and Lord Rawdon sought to save Colonel Hayne.

[5] The execution of Colonel Hayne is mostly blamed on Lord Rawdon, and this brave nobleman has faced criticism across America for an act that has been widely condemned. A letter he sent to the late General Lee, upon receiving the memoirs of the southern war written by him, which was published in the "View of the Campaign of 1781, in the Carolinas, by H. Lee," presents the British perspective on that incident and clears Lord Rawdon of any wrongdoing. Lieutenant Colonel Balfour was in command, and Lord Rawdon tried to save Colonel Hayne.

[6] The British accounts acknowledge only two hundred and fifty-seven missing; but General Greene, in his letter of the ninth of September, says, that including seventy wounded who were left at Eutaw, he made five hundred prisoners.

[6] The British reports only recognize two hundred and fifty-seven missing; however, General Greene, in his letter dated September 9th, states that including seventy wounded left at Eutaw, he captured five hundred prisoners.

[7] During this campaign a very effective expedition against the Cherokees was conducted by General Pickens. When the struggle for South Carolina recommenced, those savages were stimulated to renew their incursions into the settlements of the whites. At the head of about four hundred mounted militia, Pickens penetrated into their country, burned thirteen of their villages, killed upwards of forty Indians, and took a number of prisoners, without the loss of a single man. On this occasion a new and formidable mode of attack was introduced. The militia horse rushed upon the Indians, and charged them sword in hand. Terrified at the rapidity of the pursuit, the Cherokees humbly sued for peace, which was granted on terms calculated to restrain depredations in future.

[7] During this campaign, General Pickens led a highly effective operation against the Cherokees. When the conflict in South Carolina reignited, those tribes were motivated to resume their attacks on white settlements. Leading around four hundred mounted militia, Pickens advanced into their territory, burned down thirteen of their villages, killed over forty Indians, and captured several prisoners, all without losing a single man. On this occasion, a new and powerful tactic was used. The militia cavalry charged at the Indians, swords drawn. Frightened by the swift pursuit, the Cherokees humbly asked for peace, which was granted with conditions designed to prevent future raids.

[8] In the judicious orders given to Wayne, Greene endeavoured to impress on that officer the importance of a course of conduct, always observed by himself, which might tend to conciliate parties. "Try," says he, "by every means in your power, to soften the malignity and dreadful resentments subsisting between the Whig and Tory; and put a stop as much as possible to that cruel custom of putting men to death after they surrender themselves prisoners. The practice of plundering you will endeavour to check as much as possible; and point out to the militia the ruinous consequences of the policy. Let your discipline be as regular and as rigid as the nature and constitution of your troops will admit."—2 Johnson, 277.

[8] In the careful instructions given to Wayne, Greene aimed to impress upon him the importance of maintaining a conduct he always practiced, which could help ease tensions between parties. "Do your best," he said, "by any means you have, to reduce the hostility and deep resentments between the Whigs and Tories; and put an end as much as possible to the cruel practice of executing men after they surrender. I’ll try to limit looting as much as I can; and make sure to show the militia the damaging effects of such behavior. Your discipline should be as orderly and strict as the nature and capabilities of your troops allow."—2 Johnson, 277.

[9] The distresses of the southern army were such that, if plainly described, truth would wear the appearance of fiction. They were almost naked and barefooted, frequently without food, and always without pay. That he might relieve them when in the last extremity, without diminishing the exertions of their general to derive support from other sources, by creating an opinion that supplies could be drawn from him, Mr. Morris, as was stated by himself in conversation with the author, employed an agent to attend the southern army as a volunteer, whose powers were unknown to General Greene. This agent was instructed to watch its situation; and, whenever it appeared impossible for the general to extricate himself from his embarrassments, to furnish him, on his pledging the public faith for repayment, with a draught on the financier for such a sum as would relieve the urgency of the moment. Thus was Greene occasionally rescued from impending ruin by aids which appeared providential, and for which he could not account.

[9] The hardships faced by the southern army were so severe that, if described plainly, the truth would seem like fiction. They were nearly naked and barefoot, often went without food, and were always without pay. To help them in their dire circumstances without reducing their general's efforts to seek support elsewhere, Mr. Morris, as he mentioned in a conversation with the author, sent an agent to the southern army as a volunteer, whose authority was unknown to General Greene. This agent was tasked with observing the situation; whenever it seemed impossible for the general to get out of trouble, he was to provide him, on the condition that the general would guarantee repayment, with a draft on the financier for an amount sufficient to alleviate the immediate need. In this way, Greene was sometimes saved from imminent disaster by resources that seemed miraculous and for which he had no explanation.

[10] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 2, pp. 305, 399, 400, 452.

[10] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 2, pp. 305, 399, 400, 452.

[11] Secret Journals of Congress, v. 2, pp. 412, 418, 454.

[11] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 2, pp. 412, 418, 454.

[12] Secret Journals of Congress, v. 3, p. 249.

[12] Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 3, p. 249.

[13] In addition to the public documents and accounts, the author received a statement of this action in a letter from his friend Captain Parker.

[13] Along with the public documents and accounts, the author got a statement about this action in a letter from his friend Captain Parker.

[14] By a resolution of the preceding year, the inquiry into his conduct had been dispensed with, and he had been restored to his command in the army.

[14] A resolution from the previous year had eliminated the investigation into his behavior, and he was reinstated in his army command.

[15] See note, No. I. at the end of the volume.

[15] See note, No. I. at the end of the book.

[16] Gordon.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Gordon.

[17] See note, No. II. at the end of the volume.

[17] See note, No. II. at the end of the volume.

[18] General Mifflin.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ General Mifflin.

[19] "Resolved that the statue be of bronze: the general to be represented in a Roman dress, holding a truncheon in his right hand, and his head encircled with a laurel wreath. The statue to be supported by a marble pedestal on which are to be represented, in basso relievo, the following principal events of the war, in which General Washington commanded in person: the evacuation of Boston:—the capture of the Hessians at Trenton:—the battle of Princeton:—the action of Monmouth:—and the surrender of York.—On the upper part of the front of the pedestal to be engraved as follows: the United States in congress assembled, ordered this statue to be erected in the year of our Lord 1783, in honour of George Washington, the illustrious Commander-in-chief of the armies of the United States of America, during the war which vindicated and secured their liberty, sovereignty and independence."

[19] "It was agreed that the statue will be made of bronze, featuring the general dressed in Roman attire, holding a baton in his right hand, with his head adorned by a laurel wreath. The statue will stand on a marble pedestal, which will display, in low relief, the key events of the war where General Washington personally led: the evacuation of Boston, the capture of the Hessians at Trenton, the battle of Princeton, the action at Monmouth, and the surrender at York. The upper part of the front of the pedestal will be engraved with the following: the United States in congress assembled ordered this statue to be erected in the year of our Lord 1783, in honor of George Washington, the esteemed Commander-in-chief of the armies of the United States of America during the war that affirmed and secured their liberty, sovereignty, and independence."

[20] This resolution has been carried into execution. The statue it ordained now stands in the capitol of Virginia, in a spacious area in the centre of the building. A bust of the Marquis de Lafayette, which was also directed by the legislature, is placed in a niche of the wall in the same part of the building.

[20] This resolution has been put into action. The statue it called for now stands in the Virginia capitol, in a large area at the center of the building. A bust of the Marquis de Lafayette, which was also ordered by the legislature, is placed in a niche on the wall in the same section of the building.

[21] About one hundred and fifty miles.

[21] Approximately one hundred and fifty miles.

[22] Mr. Jefferson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Jefferson.

[23] General Gates was associated with him in the mission.

[23] General Gates was partnered with him on the mission.

[24] It is in these words; "whereas it is the desire of the representatives of this commonwealth to embrace every suitable occasion of testifying their sense of the unexampled merits of George Washington, esquire, towards his country, and it is their wish in particular that those great works for its improvement, which both as springing from the liberty which he has been so instrumental in establishing, and as encouraged by his patronage, will be durable monuments of his glory, may be made monuments also of the gratitude of his country. Be it enacted, &c." This bill is understood to have been drawn by Mr. Madison.

[24] In these words: "the representatives of this commonwealth want to take every appropriate opportunity to express their appreciation for the exceptional contributions of George Washington, esquire, to his country. They specifically wish that the significant achievements stemming from the freedom he helped establish, and supported through his patronage, will not only stand as lasting symbols of his greatness but also as expressions of gratitude from his country. Therefore, be it enacted, &c." This bill is believed to have been drafted by Mr. Madison.

[25] Mr. Madison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Madison.

[26] Mr. Fitzsimmons, and Mr. Rutledge.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Fitzsimmons and Mr. Rutledge.

[27] On a subsequent occasion, an attempt was made to obtain a resolution of congress, recommending as an additional amendment to the eighth article of the confederation, that the taxes for the use of the continent should be laid and levied separate from any other tax, and should be paid directly into the national treasury; and that the collectors respectively should be liable to an execution to be issued by the treasurer, or his deputy, under the direction of congress, for any arrears of taxes by him to be collected, which should not be paid into the treasury in conformity with the requisitions of congress.

[27] Later on, there was an effort to get Congress to pass a resolution suggesting an additional amendment to the eighth article of the confederation, stating that taxes for the use of the continent should be assessed and collected separately from any other taxes and should go directly into the national treasury. Furthermore, the collectors would be subject to having an execution issued by the treasurer or their deputy, following Congress's direction, for any unpaid taxes they were supposed to collect that weren't deposited into the treasury as required by Congress.

Such was the prevalence of state policy, even in the government of the union, or such the conviction of the inutility of recommending such an amendment, that a vote of congress could not be obtained for asking this salutary regulation as a security for the revenue only for eight years.

Such was the dominance of state policy, even in the federal government, or such was the belief that recommending such an amendment was pointless, that Congress couldn’t get a vote to request this beneficial regulation as a safeguard for revenue for eight years.

[28] See note, No. III. at the end of the volume.

[28] See the note, No. III. at the end of the book.

[29] The facts relative to this negotiation were stated in the correspondence of General Washington. The statement is supported by the Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 4, p. 329, and those which follow.

[29] The details about this negotiation were outlined in General Washington's correspondence. This account is backed by the Secret Journals of Congress, vol. 4, p. 329, and the subsequent entries.

[30] Edmund Randolph, James Madison, Walter Jones, St. George Tucker, and Meriwether Smith.

[30] Edmund Randolph, James Madison, Walter Jones, St. George Tucker, and Meriwether Smith.

[31] Mr. Jay.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Jay.

[32] New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.

[32] New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.

[33] Mr. Madison.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Madison.

[34] Mr. Randolph.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. Randolph.

[35] General Knox.

General Knox.

[36] This sentiment was far from being avowed by any correspondent of General Washington, but is stated in the private letters to him, to have been taken up by some.

[36] This feeling wasn’t openly shared by any of General Washington’s correspondents, but private letters to him indicate that it was embraced by some.

[37] In a subsequent part of the same letter, this gentleman draws the outlines of a constitution such as he would wish. It is essentially the same with that which was recommended by the convention.

[37] In another section of the same letter, this man sketches out the framework of a constitution that he prefers. It is basically the same as the one suggested by the convention.

[38] This valuable officer died in Georgia in the year 1786.

[38] This influential officer passed away in Georgia in 1786.

[39] Colonel Hamilton, Mr. Madison, and Mr. Jay.

[39] Colonel Hamilton, Mr. Madison, and Mr. Jay.

[40] North Carolina and Rhode Island did not at first accept the constitution, and New York was apparently dragged into it by a repugnance to being excluded from the confederacy. By the convention of that state a circular letter was addressed to the several states in the union inviting them to unite in calling a general convention to revise the constitution. Its friends seem to have been persuaded that this measure, if successful, would effectually destroy the edifice they had erected with so much labour, before an experience of its advantages could dissipate the prejudices which had been excited against it. "You will have seen," said one of its most effective advocates, "the circular letter from the convention of this state. It has a most pernicious tendency. If an early general convention can not be parried, it is seriously to be feared that the system which has resisted so many direct attacks, may be at length successfully undermined by its enemies. It is now perhaps to be wished that Rhode Island may not accede until this new crisis of danger be over; some think it would be better if even New York had held out until the operation of the government could have dissipated the fears which artifice had created, and the attempts resulting from those fears and artifices."

[40] North Carolina and Rhode Island initially rejected the constitution, and New York seemed to join in out of fear of being left out of the confederacy. The convention in that state sent out a circular letter to the other states in the union, inviting them to join in calling a general convention to revise the constitution. Supporters of the constitution believed that if this effort succeeded, it would effectively dismantle the structure they had worked so hard to build before anyone could see the benefits and overcome the biases against it. "You have likely seen," said one of its strongest supporters, "the circular letter from the convention of this state. It has a very harmful effect. If we can't prevent an early general convention, there's a serious risk that the system, which has survived so many direct threats, may ultimately be undermined by its opponents. It might be better for Rhode Island not to join until this new danger passes; some even think it would have been wise for New York to wait so that the government could alleviate the fears created by deception and the attempts that arose from those fears and deceptions."

[41] The reluctance with which General Washington assumed his new dignity, and that genuine modesty which was a distinguished feature of his character, are further illustrated by the following extract from a letter to General Knox. "I feel for those members of the new congress, who, hitherto, have given an unavailing attendance at the theatre of action. For myself, the delay may be compared to a reprieve; for in confidence, I tell you (with the world it would obtain little credit,) that my movements to the chair of government will be accompanied by feelings not unlike those of a culprit who is going to the place of his execution; so unwilling am I in the evening of life, nearly consumed in public cares, to quit a peaceful abode for an ocean of difficulties, without that competency of political skill, abilities, and inclination, which are necessary to manage the helm. I am sensible that I am embarking the voice of the people, and a good name of my own on this voyage; but what returns will be made for them heaven alone can foretell.—Integrity and firmness are all I can promise; these, be the voyage long or short, shall never forsake me, although I may be deserted by all men; for of the consolations which are to be derived from these, under any circumstances, the world can not deprive me."

[41] General Washington's hesitation to take on his new role, along with his genuine modesty that was a defining trait of his character, is further highlighted by this excerpt from a letter to General Knox. "I empathize with the members of the new Congress who have previously attended sessions that led to no real action. For me, this delay feels like a reprieve; I admit to you (though it wouldn't earn much trust with the world) that my approach to the seat of government feels similar to a convict heading to execution. I am so reluctant, at this late stage of my life, almost worn down by public responsibilities, to leave a peaceful home for a sea of challenges, without the necessary political skills, abilities, and passion to steer through it. I know that I’m putting the people's voice and my own reputation at stake on this journey; but only heaven knows what will come of it. — Integrity and determination are all I can offer; whether the journey is long or short, they will never leave me, even if I’m abandoned by everyone else; because no matter the situation, the world cannot take away the comfort that comes from them."

[42] This has since been denominated the department of state.

[42] This is now called the Department of State.

[43] The following extract from a letter written July 1789, to Doctor Stuart, who had communicated to him this among other private insinuations, shows the ideas entertained by the President on this subject. "It is to be lamented that a question has been stirred which has given rise to so much animadversion, and which I confess has given me much uneasiness, lest it should be supposed by some unacquainted with facts that the object in view was not displeasing to me. The truth is, the question was moved before I arrived, without any privity or knowledge of it on my part, and urged after I was apprised of it contrary to my opinion;—for I foresaw and predicted the reception it has met with, and the use that would be made of it by the enemies of the government. Happily the matter is now done with, I hope never to be revived."

[43] The following excerpt from a letter written in July 1789 to Doctor Stuart, who had shared this and other private hints with him, reveals the President's thoughts on the issue. "It is unfortunate that a question has been raised that has led to so much criticism, and I admit it has caused me considerable worry, as some people unfamiliar with the facts might think that the topic was not upsetting to me. The truth is, the question was brought up before I got here, without my knowledge or involvement, and it was pushed after I was made aware of it against my wishes; for I predicted the backlash it would receive and how it would be used by the government's opponents. Thankfully, the matter is now settled, and I hope it will never come up again."

[44] Just before his departure from New York the President received from the Count de Moustiers, the minister of France, official notice that he was permitted by his court to return to Europe. By the orders of his sovereign he added, "that His Majesty was pleased at the alteration which had taken place in the government, and congratulated America on the choice they had made of a President." As from himself, he observed that the government of this country had been hitherto of so fluctuating a nature, that no dependence could be placed on its proceedings; in consequence of which foreign nations had been cautious of entering into treaties, or engagements of any kind with the United States: but that in the present government there was a head to look up to, and power being placed in the hands of its officers, stability in its measures might be expected. The disposition of his Christian Majesty to cultivate the good will of the new government was also manifested by his conduct in the choice of a minister to replace the Count de Moustiers. Colonel Ternan was named as a person who would be particularly acceptable to America, and his appointment was preceded by the compliment of ascertaining the sense of the President respecting him.

[44] Just before leaving New York, the President received official notification from Count de Moustiers, the French minister, that he was allowed by his government to return to Europe. He added that His Majesty was pleased with the change in the government and congratulated America on their choice of President. Personally, he noted that the governance of this country had been so unstable that no one could rely on its actions; as a result, foreign nations had been hesitant to enter into treaties or any agreements with the United States. However, with the current government, there was now a leader to look up to, and since power was in the hands of its officials, stability in decisions could be expected. The willingness of His Christian Majesty to foster goodwill with the new government was also shown in his choice of a new minister to succeed Count de Moustiers. Colonel Ternan was selected as someone who would be especially welcomed by America, and his nomination was preceded by the courtesy of checking the President's opinion about him.

[45] It has ever been understood that these members were, on principle, in favour of the assumption as modified in the amendment made by the senate; but they withheld their assent from it when originally proposed in the house of representatives, in the opinion that the increase of the national debt, added to the necessity of giving to the departments of the national government a more central residence. It is understood that a greater number would have changed had it been necessary.

[45] It has always been understood that these members generally supported the idea, as changed by the senate's amendment; however, they did not agree with it when it was first proposed in the house of representatives, believing that increasing the national debt, along with the need to give the national government departments a more central location, was a concern. It's understood that more members would have switched their positions if it had been necessary.

[46] On the first information at St. Augustine that M'Gillivray was about to repair to New York, the intelligence was communicated to the governor at the Havanna, and the secretary of East Florida came to New York, with a large sum of money to purchase flour, as it was said; but to embarrass the negotiations with the Creeks was believed to be his real design. He was closely watched, and measures were taken to render any attempts he might make abortive.

[46] When St. Augustine first learned that M'Gillivray was planning to go to New York, the news was sent to the governor in Havana. The secretary of East Florida then traveled to New York with a large amount of money, supposedly to buy flour, but people believed his actual goal was to complicate the negotiations with the Creeks. He was kept under close surveillance, and steps were taken to thwart any attempts he might make.

[47] See note, No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[47] See note, No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[48] On giving his assent to the bill "regulating the military establishment of the United States," the President subjoined to the entry in his diary the remark, that although he gave it his sanction, "he did not conceive that the military establishment was adequate to the exigencies of the government, and to the protection it was intended to afford." It consisted of one regiment of infantry, and one battalion of artillery, amounting in the total, exclusive of commissioned officers, to twelve hundred and sixteen men.

[48] After approving the bill "regulating the military establishment of the United States," the President wrote in his diary that even though he approved it, "he didn’t believe the military setup was sufficient for the needs of the government and the protection it was supposed to provide." It included one infantry regiment and one artillery battalion, totaling twelve hundred and sixteen men, not counting the commissioned officers.

[49] Rhode Island had adopted the constitution in the preceding May, and had thus completed the union.

[49] Rhode Island adopted the constitution last May, completing the union.

[50] In a more confidential message to the senate, all the objects of the negotiation in which Mr. Morris had been employed were detailed, and the letters of that gentleman, with the full opinion of the President were communicated.

[50] In a more private message to the Senate, all the points of the negotiation that Mr. Morris had been involved in were outlined, and his letters, along with the President's complete opinion, were shared.

[51] The interest on the assumed debt was to commence with the year 1792.

[51] The interest on the estimated debt was set to begin in 1792.

[52] See note, No. V. at the end of the volume.

[52] See note, No. V. at the end of the volume.

[53] He stopped several days on the Potomac, where he executed finally the powers vested in him by the legislature for fixing on a place which should become the residence of congress, and the metropolis of the United States.

[53] He stayed for several days on the Potomac, where he ultimately carried out the authority given to him by the legislature to choose a location that would serve as the residence of Congress and the capital of the United States.

[54] The following is the message which he delivered on this occasion.

[54] Here’s the message he shared on this occasion.

Gentlemen of the house of representatives—

Members of the House of Representatives—

I have maturely considered the act passed by the two houses, entitled "an act for the apportionment of representatives among the several states according to the first enumeration," and I return it to your house, wherein it originated, with the following objections.

I have thoughtfully considered the bill passed by both houses, titled "an act for the apportionment of representatives among the several states according to the first enumeration," and I am sending it back to your house, where it started, with the following objections.

First. The constitution has prescribed that representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, and there is no proportion or divisor which, applied to the respective numbers of the states, will yield the number and allotment of representatives proposed by the bill.

First. The constitution states that representatives must be distributed among the states based on their population, and there is no ratio or divisor that, when applied to the populations of the states, will provide the number and distribution of representatives suggested by the bill.

Secondly. The constitution has also provided, that the number of representatives shall not exceed one for thirty thousand, which restriction is by the context, and by fair and obvious construction, to be applied to the separate and respective numbers of the states, and the bill has allotted to eight of the states more than one for thirty thousand.

Secondly. The constitution also states that the number of representatives cannot exceed one for every thirty thousand people, and this limit is to be understood in relation to the individual populations of each state. However, the bill has assigned more than one representative for every thirty thousand in eight of the states.

[55] Forts Hamilton and Jefferson.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Forts Hamilton and Jefferson.

[56] In his official letter, General St. Clair says that the ground would not admit a larger interval.

[56] In his official letter, General St. Clair states that the ground couldn't accommodate a larger gap.

[57] The following extract from the official letter of the Commander-in-chief is inserted, as showing both his own situation and his opinion of the behaviour of his troops. "I have nothing, sir, to lay to the charge of the troops but their want of discipline, which, from the short time they had been in service, it was impossible they should have acquired; and which rendered it very difficult when they were thrown into confusion, to reduce them again to order; and is one reason why the loss has fallen so heavily upon the officers who did every thing in their power to effect it. Neither were my own exertions wanting; but worn down with illness, and suffering under a painful disease, unable either to mount, or dismount a horse without assistance, they were not so great as they otherwise would, or perhaps ought to have been."

[57] The following excerpt from the official letter of the Commander-in-Chief is included to show both his situation and his opinion on the behavior of his troops. "I have nothing, sir, to blame the troops for except their lack of discipline. Given the short time they had been in service, it was impossible for them to have developed it, which made it very difficult to restore order when they got confused. This is one reason why the loss has been so heavy on the officers who did everything they could to manage it. My own efforts were not lacking either; however, weakened by illness and suffering from a painful condition, unable to get on or off a horse without help, my contributions were not as significant as they otherwise would have been, or perhaps should have been."

[58] Although his leg had been broken by a ball, Major Butler, mounted on horseback, led his battalion to the charge.

[58] Even though a ball had broken his leg, Major Butler, riding on horseback, led his battalion into battle.

[59] See note, No. VI. at the end of the volume.

[59] Check the note, No. VI. at the end of the book.

[60] The salary of the secretary of state, which was the highest, was three thousand five hundred dollars.

[60] The salary of the secretary of state, which was the highest, was $3,500.

[61] See Mr. Jefferson's correspondence.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Check Mr. Jefferson's correspondence.

[62] See note, No. VII. at the end of the volume.

[62] See the note, No. VII. at the end of the book.

[63] In his letter enclosing the proclamation to the secretary of the treasury, the President observed, "I have no doubt but that the proclamation will undergo many strictures; and, as the effect proposed may not be answered by it, it will be necessary to look forward in time to ulterior arrangements. And here, not only the constitution and laws must strictly govern, but the employment of the regular troops avoided, if it be possible to effect order without their aid; yet if no other means will effectually answer, and the constitution and laws will authorize these, they must be used as the dernier ressort."

[63] In his letter to the secretary of the treasury that included the proclamation, the President stated, "I am sure that the proclamation will face a lot of criticism; and since the intended outcome may not be achieved with it, we need to plan for future actions. Here, not only must we adhere strictly to the constitution and laws, but we should also avoid using regular troops if it's possible to maintain order without their help; however, if no other options will effectively work and the constitution and laws allow for it, they must be used as a last resort."

[64] In consequence of these nominations of foreign ministers, a motion was made in the senate on a point which is of some importance in settling the principles of the American government. It was contended that the power of that body over the appointment of a foreign minister gave the right to inquire into the policy of making any appointment whatever; and that in exercising this power, they were not to confine themselves to a consideration of the fitness of the person nominated, but were to judge of the propriety of the mission; and were consequently to be informed of the motives which had decided the President to adopt the measure. This opinion was overruled by a small majority.

[64] As a result of these nominations of foreign ministers, a motion was put forward in the Senate on an important issue regarding the foundations of American government. It was argued that the Senate's authority to appoint a foreign minister allowed them to question the policy behind any appointment. Furthermore, it was claimed that in using this power, they shouldn't just consider the qualifications of the nominee but should also evaluate the appropriateness of the mission. Hence, they needed to understand the reasons that led the President to take this action. This viewpoint was rejected by a slim majority.

[65] See note, No. VIII. at the end of the volume.

[65] Check the note, No. VIII. at the end of the volume.

[66] On the 22d of February, the birthday of the President, a motion was made to adjourn for half an hour. It was perfectly understood that this motion was made to give the members an opportunity of waiting on the chief magistrate to make the compliments adapted to the occasion.

[66] On February 22nd, the President's birthday, a motion was proposed to take a half-hour break. It was clearly understood that this motion was intended to allow the members to visit the chief magistrate to extend their best wishes for the occasion.

This was seriously opposed, and the ayes and noes called upon the question. The adjournment was carried by forty-one to eighteen. The day was celebrated by several companies, and some toasts were published manifesting the deep sense which was entertained of the exalted services of this illustrious citizen. These circumstances gave great umbrage to some of those who could perceive monarchical tendencies in every act of respect, and the offenders were rebuked in the National Gazette for setting up an idol who might become dangerous to liberty, and for the injustice of neglecting all his compatriots of the revolution, and ascribing to him the praise which was due to others.

This faced strong opposition, and a vote was taken. The motion to adjourn passed with forty-one in favor and eighteen against. The day was celebrated by various groups, and some toasts were published expressing deep appreciation for the remarkable contributions of this notable citizen. These events upset some who saw monarchical tendencies in every gesture of respect, and the offenders were criticized in the National Gazette for creating an idol who might threaten liberty, as well as for the unfairness of overlooking all his fellow revolutionaries and attributing the praise that should go to others solely to him.

[67] This event was announced to the President by the minister plenipotentiary of France at Philadelphia, in February, 1793. Through the secretary of state, an answer was returned, of which the following is an extract, "the President receives with great satisfaction this attention of the executive council, and the desire they have manifested of making known to us the resolution entered into by the national convention even before a definitive regulation of their new establishment could take place. Be assured, sir, that the government and the citizens of the United States, view with the most sincere pleasure, every advance of your nation towards its happiness, an object essentially connected with its liberty, and they consider the union of principles and pursuits between our two countries as a link which binds still closer their interests and affections.

[67] This event was communicated to the President by the French minister plenipotentiary in Philadelphia in February 1793. The secretary of state sent back a response, of which the following is an excerpt: "The President is very pleased to receive this recognition from the executive council and appreciates their intention to inform us about the decision made by the national convention, even before a final regulation of their new government could take place. Please be assured, sir, that the government and the citizens of the United States sincerely welcome every step your nation takes toward its happiness, which is fundamentally tied to its freedom, and they see the union of principles and goals between our two countries as a bond that strengthens their mutual interests and affections."

"We earnestly wish, on our part, that these our mutual dispositions may be improved to mutual good, by establishing our commercial intercourse on principles as friendly to natural right and freedom as are those of our governments."

"We sincerely hope that our mutual intentions can be enhanced for our shared benefit by establishing our trade relationships based on principles that are as supportive of natural rights and freedom as those of our governments."

Table of Contents

List of Illustrations

spines

spines

 

President Washington

President Washington

From the portrait by John Vanderlyn, in the Capitol at Washington

From the portrait by John Vanderlyn, in the Capitol in Washington

This full-length portrait of our First President is the work of an artist to whom Napoleon I awarded a gold medal for his "Marius Among the Ruins of Carthage," and another of whose masterpieces, "Ariadne in Naxos," is pronounced one of the finest nudes in the history of American art. For Vanderlyn sat many other notable public men, including Monroe, Madison, Calhoun, Clinton, Zachary Taylor and Aaron Burr, who was his patron and whose portrait by Vanderlyn hangs in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art. Nevertheless, Vanderlyn failed in achieving the success his genius merited, and he once declared bitterly that "no one but a professional quack can live in America." Poverty paralyzed his energies, and in 1852, old and discouraged he retired to his native town of Kingston, New York, so poor that he had to borrow twenty-five cents to pay the expressage of his trunk. Obtaining a bed at the local hotel, he was found dead in it the next morning, in his seventy-seventh year.

This full-length portrait of our First President was created by an artist who received a gold medal from Napoleon I for his work "Marius Among the Ruins of Carthage." Another of his masterpieces, "Ariadne in Naxos," is considered one of the finest nude paintings in American art history. Vanderlyn also painted many other prominent figures, including Monroe, Madison, Calhoun, Clinton, Zachary Taylor, and Aaron Burr, who was his patron and whose portrait by Vanderlyn hangs in the New York Metropolitan Museum of Art. Despite his talent, Vanderlyn struggled to achieve the success he deserved and once bitterly remarked that "no one but a professional quack can live in America." Financial hardship drained his energy, and in 1852, feeling old and disheartened, he returned to his hometown of Kingston, New York, so broke that he had to borrow twenty-five cents to pay for shipping his trunk. After getting a room at the local hotel, he was found dead in bed the next morning, at the age of seventy-seven.


THE

LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON,

COMMANDER IN CHIEF

OF THE

AMERICAN FORCES,

DURING THE WAR WHICH ESTABLISHED THE INDEPENDENCE OF HIS COUNTRY,

AND

FIRST PRESIDENT

OF THE

UNITED STATES.

COMPILED UNDER THE INSPECTION OF

THE HONOURABLE BUSHROD WASHINGTON,

FROM

ORIGINAL PAPERS

BEQUEATHED TO HIM BY HIS DECEASED RELATIVE, AND NOW IN POSSESSION OF THE AUTHOR.

TO WHICH IS PREFIXED,

AN INTRODUCTION,

CONTAINING A COMPENDIOUS VIEW OF THE COLONIES PLANTED BY THE ENGLISH ON THE

CONTINENT OF NORTH AMERICA,

FROM THEIR SETTLEMENT TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THAT WAR WHICH TERMINATED IN THEIR

INDEPENDENCE.

BY JOHN MARSHALL.

VOL. V.


THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

THE CITIZENS' GUILD
OF WASHINGTON'S BOYHOOD HOME
FREDERICKSBURG, VA.

1926

1926

Printed in the U.S.A.

Made in the U.S.A.

 

title page

title page

 

subscription

subscription


CONTENTS

CHAPTER I.

G. Washington again unanimously elected President.... War between Great Britain and France.... Queries of the President respecting the conduct to be adopted by the American government.... Proclamation of neutrality.... Arrival of Mr. Genet as minister from France.... His conduct.... Illegal proceedings of the French cruisers.... Opinions of the cabinet.... State of parties.... Democratic societies.... Genet calculates upon the partialities of the American people for France, and openly insults their government.... Rules laid down by the executive to be observed in the ports of the United States in relation to the powers at war.... The President requests the recall of Genet.... British order of 8th of June, 1793.... Decree of the national convention relative to neutral commerce.

G. Washington was again elected President unanimously. There was a war between Great Britain and France. The President had questions about how the American government should respond. A proclamation of neutrality was issued. Mr. Genet arrived as the minister from France. His behavior and the illegal actions of the French cruisers raised concerns. The cabinet shared their opinions. There was a split in political parties and the rise of democratic societies. Genet relied on the American people's sympathies for France and openly insulted their government. The executive laid out rules for the ports of the United States regarding the warring powers. The President asked for Genet's recall. A British order was issued on June 8, 1793, along with a decree from the national convention concerning neutral commerce.

CHAPTER II.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... His message on the foreign relations of the United States.... Report of the Secretary of State on the commerce of the United States.... He resigns.... Is succeeded by Mr. Randolph.... Mr. Madison's resolutions founded on the above report.... Debate thereon.... Debates on the subject of a navy.... An embargo law.... Mission of Mr. Jay to Great Britain.... Inquiry into the conduct of the Secretary of the Treasury, terminates honourably to him.... Internal taxes.... Congress adjourns.

Meeting of Congress... President's speech... His message about the foreign relations of the United States... Report from the Secretary of State regarding U.S. commerce... He resigns... Is succeeded by Mr. Randolph... Mr. Madison's resolutions based on the above report... Debate about it... Discussions on the topic of a navy... An embargo law... Mission of Mr. Jay to Great Britain... Inquiry into the actions of the Secretary of the Treasury, which ends favorably for him... Internal taxes... Congress adjourns.

CHAPTER III.

Genet recalled.... Is succeeded by Mr. Fauchet.... Gouverneur Morris recalled, and is succeeded by Mr. Monroe.... Kentucky remonstrance.... Intemperate resolutions of the people of that state.... General Wayne defeats the Indians on the Miamis.... Insurrection in the western parts of Pennsylvania.... Quelled by the prompt and vigorous measures of the government.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Democratic societies.... Resignation of Colonel Hamilton.... Is succeeded by Mr. Wolcott.... Resignation of General Knox.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.... Conditionally ratified by the President.... The treaty unpopular.... Mr. Randolph resigns.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Colonel M'Henry appointed secretary at war.... Charge against the President rejected..... Treaty with the Indians north-west of the Ohio.... With Algiers.... With Spain.... Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet..... The house of representatives call upon the President for papers relating to the treaty with Great Britain.... He declines sending them.... Debates upon the treaty making power.... Upon the bill for making appropriations to carry into execution the treaty with Great Britain.... Congress adjourns.... The President endeavours to procure the liberation of Lafayette.

Genet recalled.... Succeeded by Mr. Fauchet.... Gouverneur Morris recalled, and succeeded by Mr. Monroe.... Kentucky's protest.... Extreme resolutions from the people of that state.... General Wayne defeats the Indians at the Miamis.... Rebellion in western Pennsylvania.... Suppressed by the swift and strong actions of the government.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Democratic societies.... Resignation of Colonel Hamilton.... Succeeded by Mr. Wolcott.... Resignation of General Knox.... Succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.... Conditionally ratified by the President.... The treaty is unpopular.... Mr. Randolph resigns.... Succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Colonel M'Henry appointed Secretary of War.... Charges against the President rejected..... Treaty with the Indians northwest of the Ohio.... With Algiers.... With Spain.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet..... The House of Representatives calls on the President for documents related to the treaty with Great Britain.... He refuses to send them.... Debates on the treaty-making power.... On the bill for appropriations to implement the treaty with Great Britain.... Congress adjourns.... The President attempts to secure the release of Lafayette.

CHAPTER IV.

Letters from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile measures of France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe recalled and General Pinckney appointed to succeed him.... General Washington's valedictory address to the people of the United States.... The Minister of France endeavours to influence the approaching election.... The President's speech to congress.... He denies the authenticity of certain spurious letters published in 1776.... John Adams elected President, and Thomas Jefferson Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... Political situation of the United States at this period.... The French government refuses to receive General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... President's speech.... Three envoys extraordinary deputed to France.... Their treatment.... Measures of hostility adopted by the American government against France.... General Washington appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And character.

Letters from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile actions by France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe is recalled and General Pinckney is appointed to take his place.... General Washington's farewell address to the people of the United States.... The French Minister tries to influence the upcoming election.... The President's speech to Congress.... He denies the authenticity of some fake letters published in 1776.... John Adams is elected President and Thomas Jefferson is elected Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... The political situation of the United States at this time.... The French government refuses to accept General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... President's speech.... Three extraordinary envoys are sent to France.... Their treatment.... Hostile measures taken by the American government against France.... General Washington appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And his character.

NOTES.

Footnotes.


LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

President Washington

Martha Washington

George Washington

George Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

 George Washington

Martha Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

Mount Vernon

 Resting-Place of George and Martha Washington at Mount Vernon


THE LIFE

OF

GEORGE WASHINGTON


CHAPTER I.

G. Washington again unanimously elected President.... War between Great Britain and France.... Queries of the President respecting the conduct to be adopted by the American government.... Proclamation of neutrality.... Arrival of Mr. Genet as minister from France.... His conduct.... Illegal proceedings of the French cruisers.... Opinions of the cabinet.... State of parties.... Democratic societies.... Genet calculates upon the partialities of the American people for France, and openly insults their government.... Rules laid down by the executive to be observed in the ports of the United States in relation to the powers at war.... The President requests the recall of Genet.... British order of 8th of June, 1793.... Decree of the national convention relative to neutral commerce.

G. Washington was once again unanimously elected President.... War between Great Britain and France.... Questions from the President about how the American government should act.... Proclamation of neutrality.... Mr. Genet arrives as a minister from France.... His behavior.... Illegal actions by the French cruisers.... Opinions from the cabinet.... Political party situation.... Democratic societies.... Genet relies on the American people's favoritism for France and openly disrespects their government.... Guidelines established by the executive to be followed in U.S. ports regarding the warring powers.... The President asks for Genet's recall.... British order from June 8, 1793.... Decree from the national convention regarding neutral trade.

 

1793

The term for which the President and Vice President had been elected being about to expire on the third of March, the attention of the public had been directed to the choice of persons who should fill those high offices for the ensuing four years. Respecting the President, but one opinion prevailed. From various motives, all parties concurred in desiring that the present chief magistrate should continue to afford his services to his country. Yielding to the weight of the representations made to him from various quarters, General Washington had been prevailed upon to withhold a declaration, he had at one time purposed to make, of his determination to retire from political life.

The term for which the President and Vice President had been elected was nearing its end on March 3rd, and the public was focused on who would take on those important roles for the next four years. There was a unanimous opinion about the President. For various reasons, all groups wanted the current leader to keep serving the country. Responding to the many requests he had received from different people, General Washington was convinced to delay an announcement he had once intended to make about his decision to step back from political life.

Respecting the person who should fill the office of Vice President, the public was divided. The profound statesman who had been called to the duties of that station, had drawn upon himself a great degree of obloquy, by some political tracts, in which he had laboured to maintain the proposition that a balance in government was essential to the preservation of liberty. In these disquisitions, he was supposed by his opponents to have discovered sentiments in favour of distinct orders in society; and, although he had spoken highly of the constitution of the United States, it was imagined that his balance could be maintained only by hereditary classes. He was also understood to be friendly to the system of finance which had been adopted; and was believed to be among the few who questioned the durability of the French republic. His great services, and acknowledged virtues, were therefore disregarded; and a competitor was sought for among those who had distinguished themselves in the opposition. The choice was directed from Mr. Jefferson by a constitutional restriction on the power of the electors, which would necessarily deprive him of the vote to be given by Virginia. It being necessary to designate some other opponent to Mr. Adams, George Clinton, the governor of New York, was selected for this purpose.

Respecting the person who was supposed to take on the role of Vice President, public opinion was split. The respected statesman chosen for the position had faced a lot of criticism because of some political writings in which he argued that a balance in government was vital for safeguarding liberty. In these discussions, his opponents believed he had expressed views that supported distinct social classes; and although he praised the U.S. Constitution, many thought his balance could only be maintained through hereditary classes. He was also seen as supportive of the financial system that had been adopted and was among the few who doubted the longevity of the French republic. As a result, his significant contributions and recognized virtues were overlooked, and a challenger was sought among those who had stood out in opposition. Mr. Jefferson was ruled out due to a constitutional limitation on the electors’ power, which would prevent him from receiving Virginia's vote. Therefore, to identify an alternative opponent to Mr. Adams, George Clinton, the governor of New York, was chosen for this role.

Throughout the war of the revolution, this gentleman had filled the office of chief magistrate of his native state; and, under circumstances of real difficulty, had discharged its duties with a courage, and an energy, which secured the esteem of the Commander-in-chief, and gave him a fair claim to the favour of his country. Embracing afterwards with ardour the system of state supremacy, he had contributed greatly to the rejection of the resolutions for investing congress with the power of collecting an impost on imported goods, and had been conspicuous for his determined hostility to the constitution of the United States. His sentiments respecting the measures of the government were known to concur with those of the minority in congress.

Throughout the Revolutionary War, this gentleman served as the chief magistrate of his home state, and under genuinely challenging circumstances, he carried out his duties with courage and energy, earning the respect of the Commander-in-Chief and solidifying his claim to the favor of his country. Later, he passionately supported the idea of state supremacy, playing a significant role in rejecting the resolutions to grant Congress the power to impose taxes on imported goods, and he was well-known for his strong opposition to the Constitution of the United States. His views on government actions aligned with those of the minority in Congress.

George Washington again unanimously elected president.

Both parties seemed confident in their strength; and both made the utmost exertions to insure success. On opening the ballots in the senate chamber, it appeared that the unanimous suffrage of his country had been once more conferred on General Washington, and that Mr. Adams had received a plurality of the votes.

Both parties seemed sure of their strength, and both made every effort to ensure success. When the ballots were opened in the Senate chamber, it turned out that General Washington had once again received the unanimous support of his country, and Mr. Adams had received the most votes.

The unceasing endeavours of the executive to terminate the Indian war by a treaty, had at length succeeded with the savages of the Wabash; and, through the intervention of the Six Nations, those of the Miamis had also been induced to consent to a conference to be held in the course of the ensuing spring. Though probability was against the success of this attempt to restore peace, all offensive operations, on the part of the United States, were still farther suspended. The Indians did not entirely abstain from hostilities; and the discontents of the western people were in no small degree increased by this temporary prohibition of all incursions into the country of their enemy. In Georgia, where a desire to commence hostilities against the southern Indians had been unequivocally manifested, this restraint increased the irritation against the administration.

The ongoing efforts of the government to end the Indian war through a treaty finally succeeded with the tribes of the Wabash; and, with the help of the Six Nations, the Miamis were also convinced to participate in a conference set for the next spring. Although the chances of successfully restoring peace were slim, all offensive actions by the United States were still put on hold. The Native Americans did not completely stop their attacks, and the frustrations of the people in the west grew significantly due to this temporary ban on any incursions into enemy territory. In Georgia, where there was a clear push to start hostilities against the southern tribes, this restriction only fueled more anger towards the government.

The Indian war was becoming an object of secondary magnitude. The critical and irritable state of things in France began so materially to affect the United States, as to require an exertion of all the prudence, and all the firmness, of the government. The 10th[1] of August, 1792, was succeeded in that nation by such a state of anarchy, and by scenes of so much blood and horror; the nation was understood to be so divided with respect to its future course; and the republican party was threatened by such a formidable external force; that there was much reason to doubt whether the fallen monarch would be finally deposed, or reinstated with a greater degree of splendour and power than the constitution just laid in ruins, had assigned to him. That, in the latter event, any partialities which might be manifested towards the intermediate possessors of authority, would be recollected with indignation, could not be questioned by an attentive observer of the vindictive spirit of parties;—a spirit which the deeply tragic scenes lately exhibited, could not fail to work up to its highest possible pitch. The American minister at Paris, finding himself in a situation not expected by his government, sought to pursue a circumspect line of conduct, which should in no respect compromise the United States. The executive council of France, disappointed at the coldness which that system required, communicated their dissatisfaction to their minister at Philadelphia. At the same time, Mr. Morris made full representations of every transaction to his government, and requested explicit instructions for the regulation of his future conduct.

The Indian war was becoming less important. The tense and unstable situation in France started to significantly impact the United States, prompting the government to exercise all its wisdom and resolve. On August 10, 1792, that country fell into such chaos and witnessed so much bloodshed and horror; it was clear that the nation was deeply divided about its future direction; and the republican party was under threat from a powerful external force. There were many reasons to question whether the ousted king would be permanently removed or restored with even greater wealth and power than what the constitution had just dismantled. In the latter case, any favoritism shown to those temporarily holding power would undoubtedly be remembered with anger, as any careful observer of the vengeful nature of political factions would attest—an intensity stirred up to its maximum by the tragic events recently witnessed. The American minister in Paris, facing an unexpected situation, tried to navigate carefully so as not to compromise the United States. The executive council of France, frustrated by the indifference demanded by that approach, expressed their dissatisfaction to their minister in Philadelphia. Meanwhile, Mr. Morris thoroughly reported every event to his government and requested clear instructions for how to proceed in the future.

The administration entertained no doubt of the propriety of recognizing the existing authority of France, whatever form it might assume. That every nation possessed a right to govern itself according to its own will, to change its institutions at discretion, and to transact its business through whatever agents it might think proper, were stated to Mr. Morris to be principles on which the American government itself was founded, and the application of which could be denied to no other people. The payment of the debt, so far as it was to be made in Europe, might be suspended only until the national convention should authorize some power to sign acquittances for the monies received; and the sums required for St. Domingo would be immediately furnished. These payments would exceed the instalments which had fallen due; and the utmost punctuality would be observed in future. These instructions were accompanied with assurances that the government would omit no opportunity of convincing the French people of its cordial wish to serve them; and with a declaration that all circumstances seemed to destine the two nations for the most intimate connexion with each other. It was also pressed upon Mr. Morris to seize every occasion of conciliating the affections of France to the United States, and of placing the commerce between the two countries on the best possible footing.[2]

The administration had no doubt about the appropriateness of recognizing France's existing authority, whatever form it took. They stated to Mr. Morris that every nation has the right to self-govern according to its own will, to change its institutions as it sees fit, and to conduct its business through whatever representatives it chooses. These were principles on which the American government was founded, and they could not be denied to any other people. The payment of the debt owed in Europe might be delayed only until the national convention authorized someone to sign receipts for the money received; the funds needed for St. Domingo would be provided immediately. These payments would exceed the installments that were due, and utmost punctuality would be maintained moving forward. Along with these instructions, assurances were given that the government would take every opportunity to demonstrate its genuine desire to support the French people; it was declared that all circumstances seemed to align to bring the two nations closer together. Mr. Morris was also urged to seize every chance to win the affection of France for the United States and to place the trade between the two countries on the best possible terms.[2]

The feelings of the President were in perfect unison with the sentiments expressed in this letter. His attachment to the French nation was as strong, as consistent with a due regard to the interests of his own; and his wishes for its happiness were as ardent, as was compatible with the duties of a chief magistrate to the state over which he presided. Devoted to the principles of real liberty, and approving unequivocally the republican form of government, he hoped for a favourable result from the efforts which were making to establish that form, by the great ally of the United States; but was not so transported by those efforts, as to involve his country in their issue; or totally to forget that those aids which constituted the basis of these partial feelings, were furnished by the family whose fall was the source of triumph to a large portion of his fellow citizens.

The President's feelings completely matched the sentiments expressed in this letter. His connection to the French nation was strong and consistent, while still considering his own country's interests; his desire for their happiness was as intense as was appropriate for the responsibilities of the leader of the state he governed. Committed to the principles of true liberty and fully supportive of the republican form of government, he hoped for a positive outcome from the efforts to establish that system, led by the great ally of the United States; however, he wasn’t so swept up in those efforts that he would drag his country into their consequences or completely ignore the fact that the support driving these partial feelings came from the family whose downfall was a source of victory for many of his fellow citizens.

He therefore still preserved the fixed purpose of maintaining the neutrality of the United States, however general the war might be in Europe; and his zeal for the revolution did not assume so ferocious a character as to silence the dictates of humanity, or of friendship.

He still kept his solid intention of maintaining the neutrality of the United States, no matter how widespread the war might be in Europe; and his passion for the revolution didn’t become so intense that it silenced the calls of compassion or friendship.

Not much time elapsed before the firmness of this resolution was put to the test.

Not long after, the strength of this decision was put to the test.

War between Great Britain and France.

Early in April, the declaration of war made by France against Great Britain and Holland reached the United States. This event restored full vivacity to a flame, which a peace of ten years had not been able to extinguish. A great majority of the American people deemed it criminal to remain unconcerned spectators of a conflict between their ancient enemy and republican France. The feeling upon this occasion was almost universal. Men of all parties partook of it. Disregarding totally the circumstances which led to the rupture, except the order which had been given to the French minister to leave London, and disregarding equally the fact that actual hostilities were first commenced by France, the war was confidently and generally pronounced a war of aggression on the part of Great Britain, undertaken with the sole purpose of imposing a monarchical government on the French people. The few who did not embrace these opinions, and they were certainly very few, were held up as objects of public detestation; and were calumniated as the tools of Britain, and the satellites of despotism.

Early in April, the news that France declared war on Great Britain and Holland reached the United States. This event reignited a passion that a decade of peace couldn’t extinguish. A significant majority of the American people felt it was wrong to stay neutral while their historic enemy clashed with republican France. The sentiment was nearly unanimous. People from all political backgrounds shared this feeling. Ignoring the circumstances that led to the conflict, except for the order for the French minister to leave London, and overlooking the fact that France was the first to start hostilities, the war was widely seen as an act of aggression by Great Britain aimed at forcing a monarchy on the French people. A few who disagreed with this view—though they were certainly a minority—were viewed with public contempt and were labeled as tools of Britain and supporters of tyranny.

Yet the disposition to engage in the war, was far from being general. The inclination of the public led to a full indulgence of the most extravagant partiality; but not many were willing to encounter the consequences which that indulgence would infallibly produce. The situation of America was precisely that, in which the wisdom and foresight of a prudent and enlightened government, was indispensably necessary to prevent the nation from inconsiderately precipitating itself into calamities, which its reflecting judgment would avoid.

Yet the willingness to join the war was far from widespread. The public sentiment allowed for total indulgence in the most extreme favoritism; however, not many were ready to deal with the fallout that such indulgence would inevitably cause. America's situation was exactly one where the wisdom and foresight of a careful and informed government were absolutely essential to prevent the nation from recklessly plunging into disasters that a thoughtful judgment would steer clear of.

As soon as intelligence of the rupture between France and Britain was received in the United States, indications were given in some of the seaports, of a disposition to engage in the unlawful business of privateering on the commerce of the belligerent powers. The President was firmly determined to suppress these practices, and immediately requested the attention of the heads of departments to this interesting subject.

As soon as news about the break between France and Britain reached the United States, some seaports showed signs of wanting to get involved in the illegal activity of privateering against the trade of the warring nations. The President was committed to stopping these actions and promptly asked the heads of departments to focus on this important issue.

Queries put by the president to his cabinet in relation to the conduct proper to be adopted by the American government in consequence of this event.

As the new and difficult situation in which the United States were placed suggested many delicate inquiries, he addressed a circular letter to the cabinet ministers, inclosing for their consideration a well digested series of questions, the answers to which would form a complete system by which to regulate the conduct of the executive in the arduous situations which were approaching.[3]

As the new and challenging situation the United States found itself in prompted several sensitive questions, he sent a circular letter to the cabinet ministers, including a carefully thought-out list of questions for their consideration. The answers to these questions would create a comprehensive system to guide the executive's actions in the difficult times ahead.[3]

These queries, with some of the answers of them, though submitted only to the cabinet, found their way to the leading members of the opposition; and were among the unacknowledged but operating pieces of testimony, on which the charge against the administration, of cherishing dispositions unfriendly to the French republic, was founded. In taking a view of the whole ground, points certainly occurred, and were submitted to the consideration of the cabinet, on which neither the chief magistrate nor his ministers felt any doubt. But the introduction of questions relative to these points, among others with which they were intimately connected, would present a more full view of the subject, and was incapable of producing any mischievous effect, while they were confined to those for whom alone they were intended.

These questions, along with some of the answers, were only shared with the cabinet but ended up reaching key members of the opposition. They became part of the unacknowledged yet influential evidence used to accuse the administration of harboring attitudes that were hostile to the French republic. When considering the overall situation, there were certainly points raised and presented to the cabinet that the president and his ministers had no doubts about. However, bringing up questions related to these points, alongside other closely connected matters, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and wouldn't cause any negative impact, as long as they remained exclusive to the intended recipients.

In the meeting of the heads of departments and the attorney general, which was held in consequence of this letter, it was unanimously agreed, that a proclamation ought to issue, forbidding the citizens of the United States to take part in any hostilities on the seas, with, or against, any of the belligerent powers; warning them against carrying to any of those powers articles deemed contraband according to the modern usages of nations; and enjoining them from all acts inconsistent with the duties of a friendly nation towards those at war.

In the meeting of the heads of departments and the attorney general, which took place as a result of this letter, everyone agreed that a proclamation should be issued, prohibiting U.S. citizens from participating in any hostilities at sea, either with or against any of the warring nations; warning them against delivering any items considered contraband under current international standards; and instructing them to refrain from any actions that conflict with the responsibilities of a friendly nation towards those at war.

With the same unanimity, the President was advised to receive a minister from the republic of France; but, on the question respecting a qualification to his reception, a division was perceived. The secretary of state and the attorney general were of opinion, that no cause existed for departing in the present instance from the usual mode of acting on such occasions. The revolution in France, they conceived, had produced no change in the relations between the two nations; nor was there any thing in the alteration of government, or in the character of the war, which would impair the right of France to demand, or weaken the duty of the United States faithfully to comply with the engagements which had been solemnly formed.

With the same agreement, the President was advised to meet with a minister from the Republic of France; however, when it came to the qualifications for this meeting, there was a split opinion. The Secretary of State and the Attorney General believed that there was no reason to stray from the usual practices for such occasions. They felt that the revolution in France hadn't changed the relationship between the two countries; nor was there anything about the change in government or the nature of the war that would affect France's right to make a request or lessen the United States' obligation to honor the commitments that had been formally established.

The secretaries of the treasury, and of war, held a different opinion. Admitting in its fullest latitude the right of a nation to change its political institutions according to its own will, they denied its right to involve other nations, absolutely and unconditionally, in the consequences of the changes which it may think proper to make. They maintained the right of a nation to absolve itself from the obligations even of real treaties, when such a change of circumstances takes place in the internal situation of the other contracting party, as so essentially to alter the existing state of things, that it may with good faith be pronounced to render a continuance of the connexion which results from them, disadvantageous or dangerous.

The secretaries of the treasury and defense had a different viewpoint. Recognizing that a nation has the right to change its political institutions as it sees fit, they argued that it shouldn’t have the right to drag other nations, absolutely and unconditionally, into the consequences of those changes. They asserted that a nation can free itself from obligations, even of valid treaties, when changes in the internal situation of the other party are so significant that they can honestly be seen as making the continuation of the relationship stemming from those treaties harmful or risky.

They reviewed the most prominent of those transactions which had recently taken place in France, and noticed the turbulence, the fury, and the injustice with which they were marked. The Jacobin club at Paris, whose influence was well understood, had even gone so far, previous to the meeting of the convention, as to enter into measures with the avowed object of purging that body of those persons, favourers of royalty, who might have escaped the attention of the primary assemblies. This review was taken, to show that the course of the revolution had been attended with circumstances which militate against a full conviction of its having been brought to its present stage, by such a free, regular, and deliberate act of the nation, as ought to silence all scruples about the validity of what had been done. They appeared to doubt whether the present possessors of power ought to be considered as having acquired it with the real consent of France, or as having seized it by violence;—whether the existing system could be considered as permanent, or merely temporary.

They looked over the most significant transactions that recently happened in France and noticed the chaos, anger, and unfairness that characterized them. The Jacobin club in Paris, whose influence was well known, had even taken steps before the convention meeting to remove anyone who supported the monarchy and might have slipped past the primary assemblies' attention. This review was conducted to show that the revolution had been marked by conditions that raise doubts about whether it had reached its current stage through a genuinely free, orderly, and deliberate act of the nation that should put to rest any concerns about the validity of what had occurred. They seemed to question whether those currently in power had truly gained it with the genuine consent of France or had taken it by force—whether the existing system should be seen as permanent or just temporary.

They were therefore of opinion, not that the treaties should be annulled or absolutely suspended, but that the United States should reserve, for future consideration and discussion, the question whether the operation of those treaties ought not to be deemed temporarily and provisionally suspended. Should this be the decision of the government, they thought it due to a spirit of friendly and candid procedure, in the most conciliating terms, to apprize the expected minister of this determination.

They believed that the treaties shouldn't be canceled or completely put on hold, but that the United States should keep the option open for future discussion on whether the enforcement of those treaties should be considered temporarily and provisionally suspended. If the government decided this, they thought it was important to communicate this decision to the expected minister in a friendly and straightforward manner, using the most conciliatory language.

On the questions relative to the application of the clause of guarantee to the existing war, some diversity of sentiment also prevailed. The secretary of state and the attorney general conceived, that no necessity for deciding thereon existed, while the secretaries of the treasury, and of war, were of opinion that the treaty of alliance was plainly defensive, and that the clause of guarantee did not apply to a war which, having been commenced by France, must be considered as offensive on the part of that power.

On the questions regarding the application of the guarantee clause to the current war, there was also some disagreement. The Secretary of State and the Attorney General believed there was no need to make a decision on the matter, while the Secretaries of the Treasury and War felt that the alliance treaty was clearly defensive and that the guarantee clause did not apply to a war that was started by France, which should be seen as offensive on their part.

Against convening congress, the opinion appears to have been unanimous.

The consensus was clearly against calling a meeting of Congress.

The cabinet being thus divided on an important part of the system which, in the present critical posture of affairs, ought to be adopted by the executive, the President signified his desire that the ministers would respectively state to him in writing the opinions they had formed, together with the reasoning and authorities by which those opinions were supported.

The cabinet was split on an important aspect of the system that the executive should adopt given the current critical situation. The President expressed his wish for the ministers to provide him with their written opinions, along with the reasoning and references that supported those views.

The written arguments which were presented on this occasion, while they attest the labour, and reflect honour on the talents of those by whom they were formed, and evince the equal sincerity and zeal with which the opinions on each side were advanced, demonstrate an opposition of sentiment respecting the French revolution, which threatened to shed its influence on all measures connected with that event, and to increase the discord which already existed in the cabinet.

The arguments that were presented here, while showcasing the effort and reflecting the skills of those who created them, and showing the equal sincerity and enthusiasm with which each side expressed their views, reveal a clash of opinions about the French Revolution. This conflict threatened to influence all decisions related to that event and to heighten the existing discord within the cabinet.

So far as respected the reception of a minister from the French republic without qualifying that act by any explanations, and the continuing obligation of the treaties, the President appears to have decided in favour of the opinions given by the secretary of state and the attorney general.

As far as the reception of a minister from the French republic is concerned, without any additional explanations, and the ongoing obligation of the treaties, the President seems to have favored the views presented by the Secretary of State and the Attorney General.

Proclamation of neutrality.

The proclamation of neutrality which was prepared by the attorney general, in conformity with the principles which had been adopted, was laid before the cabinet; and, being approved, was signed by the President, and ordered to be published.

The neutrality declaration created by the attorney general, in line with the adopted principles, was presented to the cabinet; after receiving approval, it was signed by the President and scheduled for publication.

This measure derives importance from the consideration, that it was the commencement of that system to which the American government afterwards inflexibly adhered, and to which much of the national prosperity is to be ascribed. It is not less important in another view. Being at variance with the prejudices, the feelings, and the passions of a large portion of the society, and being founded on no previous proceedings of the legislature, it presented the first occasion, which was thought a fit one, for openly assaulting a character, around which the affections of the people had thrown an armour theretofore deemed sacred, and for directly criminating the conduct of the President himself. It was only by opposing passions to passions, by bringing the feeling in favour of France, into conflict with those in favour of the chief magistrate, that the enemies of the administration could hope to obtain the victory.

This measure is important because it marked the beginning of the system that the American government later strictly followed, which contributed significantly to the nation's prosperity. Its significance is also notable from another perspective. Since it conflicted with the beliefs, emotions, and passions of a large part of society and was based on no prior actions from the legislature, it provided the first opportunity that was seen as suitable for openly attacking a reputation that the public had previously held in high esteem, and for directly criticizing the President's actions. The opponents of the administration could only hope to succeed by pitting one passion against another, by clashing the feelings in favor of France with those supporting the chief executive.

For a short time, the opponents of this measure treated it with some degree of delicacy. The opposition prints occasionally glanced at the executive; considered all governments, including that of the United States, as naturally hostile to the liberty of the people; and ascribed to this disposition, the combination of European governments against France, and the apathy with which this combination was contemplated by the executive. At the same time, the most vehement declamations were published, for the purpose of inflaming the resentments of the people against Britain; of enhancing the obligations of America to France; of confirming the opinions, that the coalition of European monarchs was directed, not less against the United States, than against that power to which its hostility was avowed, and that those who did not avow this sentiment were the friends of that coalition, and equally the enemies of America and France.

For a brief period, those against this measure approached it with a certain level of caution. The opposition's publications sometimes criticized the executive; they viewed all governments, including the United States, as inherently opposed to the people's freedom; and attributed this mindset to the alliance of European governments against France, as well as the indifference shown by the executive toward this alliance. Meanwhile, intense speeches and articles were released to stir up the public's anger against Britain, to emphasize America's obligations to France, and to reinforce the belief that the coalition of European monarchs was aimed at both the United States and the openly targeted power, suggesting that those who didn't share this viewpoint were supporters of the coalition and equally adversaries to both America and France.

These publications, in the first instance, sufficiently bitter, quickly assumed a highly increased degree of acrimony.

These publications, initially quite bitter, quickly took on a much higher level of hostility.

As soon as the commotions which succeeded the deposition of Louis XVI. had, in some degree, subsided, the attention of the French government was directed to the United States, and the resolution was taken to recall the minister who had been appointed by the king; and to replace him with one who might be expected to enter, with more enthusiasm, into the views of the republic.[4]

Once the chaos that followed the deposition of Louis XVI had calmed down somewhat, the French government turned its attention to the United States. They decided to recall the minister appointed by the king and replace him with someone who would likely be more enthusiastic about the goals of the republic.[4]

The citizen Genet, a gentleman of considerable talents, and of an ardent temper, was selected for this purpose.

The citizen Genet, a man of significant talents and a passionate temperament, was chosen for this purpose.

The letters he brought to the executive of the United States, and his instructions, which he occasionally communicated, were, in a high degree, flattering to the nation, and decently respectful to its government. But Mr. Genet was also furnished with private instructions, which the course of subsequent events tempted him to publish. These indicate that, if the American executive should not be found sufficiently compliant with the views of France, the resolution had been taken to employ with the people of the United States the same policy which was so successfully used with those of Europe; and thus to affect an object which legitimate negotiations might fail to accomplish.

The letters he brought to the U.S. government, along with the instructions he sometimes shared, were very flattering to the country and respectfully addressed its leadership. However, Mr. Genet also had private instructions that later events encouraged him to make public. These indicated that if the American government didn’t align closely enough with France's interests, there was a plan to use the same tactics with the American people that had worked well in Europe, aiming to achieve goals that official negotiations might not succeed in reaching.

Arrival of Mr. Genet as minister from France.
His conduct.

Mr. Genet possessed many qualities which were peculiarly adapted to the objects of his mission; but he seems to have been betrayed by the flattering reception which was given him, and by the universal fervour expressed for his republic, into a too speedy disclosure of his intentions.

Mr. Genet had many qualities that were especially suited to the goals of his mission; however, he appears to have been misled by the warm welcome he received and the widespread enthusiasm shown for his republic, leading him to reveal his intentions too quickly.

On the eighth of April he arrived, not at Philadelphia, but at Charleston, in South Carolina, a port whose contiguity to the West Indies would give it peculiar convenience as a resort for privateers. He was received by the governor of that state, and by its citizens, with an enthusiasm well calculated to dissipate every doubt he might previously have entertained, concerning the dispositions on which he was to operate. At this place he continued for several days, receiving extravagant marks of public attachment, during which time, he undertook to authorize the fitting and arming of vessels in that port, enlisting men, and giving commissions to cruise and commit hostilities on nations with whom the United States were at peace. The captures made by these cruisers were brought into port, and the consuls of France were assuming, under the authority of Mr. Genet, to hold courts of admiralty on them, to try, condemn, and authorize their sale.

On April 8, he arrived not in Philadelphia, but in Charleston, South Carolina, a port that’s conveniently close to the West Indies, making it a great spot for privateers. The governor of the state and its citizens welcomed him with enthusiasm that quickly erased any doubts he might have had about the support he would receive. He stayed there for several days, enjoying overwhelming public affection. During that time, he took steps to authorize the fitting out and armament of ships in that port, enlisted men, and issued commissions to attack and engage nations that were at peace with the United States. The ships captured by these privateers were brought into port, and under Mr. Genet's authority, the French consuls began holding admiralty courts to try, condemn, and approve their sale.

From Charleston, Mr. Genet proceeded by land to Philadelphia, receiving on his journey, at the different towns through which he passed, such marks of enthusiastic attachment as had never before been lavished on a foreign minister. On the 16th of May, he arrived at the seat of government, preceded by the intelligence of his transactions in South Carolina. This information did not diminish the extravagant transports of joy with which he was welcomed by the great body of the inhabitants. Means had been taken to render his entry pompous and triumphal; and the opposition papers exultingly stated that he was met at Gray's ferry by "crowds who flocked from every avenue of the city, to meet the republican ambassador of an allied nation."

From Charleston, Mr. Genet traveled by land to Philadelphia, receiving enthusiastic support in each town he passed through, unlike anything ever shown to a foreign minister before. On May 16th, he arrived at the seat of government, already known for his activities in South Carolina. This news did not lessen the overwhelming joy with which he was greeted by the majority of the residents. Efforts had been made to make his arrival grand and celebratory; opposition newspapers proudly reported that he was welcomed at Gray's Ferry by "crowds who came from every part of the city to greet the republican ambassador of an allied nation."

The day succeeding his arrival, he received addresses of congratulation from particular societies, and from the citizens of Philadelphia, who waited on him in a body, in which they expressed their fervent gratitude for the "zealous and disinterested aids," which the French people had furnished to America, unbounded exultation at the success with which their arms had been crowned, and a positive conviction that the safety of the United States depended on the establishment of the republic. The answers to these addresses were well calculated to preserve the idea of a complete fraternity between the two nations; and that their interests were identified.

The day after he arrived, he received congratulatory messages from several organizations and from the citizens of Philadelphia, who came together to express their deep gratitude for the "dedicated and selfless support" that the French people had provided to America. They showed immense joy at the success of their military efforts and firmly believed that the safety of the United States relied on the establishment of the republic. His responses to these messages reinforced the idea of complete friendship between the two nations and highlighted their shared interests.

The day after being thus accredited by the citizens of Philadelphia, he was presented to the President, by whom he was received with frankness, and with expressions of a sincere and cordial regard for his nation. In the conversation which took place on this occasion, Mr. Genet gave the most explicit assurances that, in consequence of the distance of the United States from the theatre of action, and of other circumstances, France did not wish to engage them in the war, but would willingly leave them to pursue their happiness and prosperity in peace. The more ready faith was given to these declarations, because it was believed that France might derive advantages from the neutrality of America, which would be a full equivalent for any services which she could render as a belligerent.

The day after being officially recognized by the citizens of Philadelphia, he was introduced to the President, who welcomed him openly and expressed genuine warmth toward his nation. In the conversation that took place, Mr. Genet provided clear assurances that, due to the distance of the United States from the conflict and other factors, France did not want to draw them into the war, but was happy to let them pursue their happiness and prosperity in peace. People readily believed these statements because it was thought that France could benefit from America's neutrality, which would be equal to any help she could offer as a participant in the conflict.

Before the ambassador of the republic had reached the seat of government, a long catalogue of complaints, partly founded on his proceedings in Charleston, had been made by the British minister to the American executive.

Before the ambassador of the republic arrived at the government seat, the British minister had provided a lengthy list of complaints to the American administration, some of which were based on his actions in Charleston.

This catalogue was composed of the assumptions of sovereignty already mentioned;—assumptions calculated to render America an instrument of hostility to be wielded by France against those powers with which she might be at war.

This catalog was made up of the mentioned assumptions of sovereignty—assumptions designed to make America a tool of hostility to be used by France against those powers she might be at war with.

Illegal proceedings of the French cruisers.

These were still further aggravated by the commission of actual hostilities within the territories of the United States. The ship Grange, a British vessel which had been cleared out from Philadelphia, was captured by the French frigate L'Ambuscade within the capes of the Delaware, while on her way to the ocean.

These were made even worse by the actual fighting happening within the borders of the United States. The ship Grange, a British vessel that had left Philadelphia, was captured by the French frigate L'Ambuscade near the Delaware capes while heading out to sea.

The prizes thus unwarrantly made, being brought within the power of the American government, Mr. Hammond, among other things, demanded a restitution of them.

The prizes that were unjustly taken and brought under the control of the American government, Mr. Hammond, among other things, requested their return.

On many of the points suggested by the conduct of Mr. Genet, and by the memorials of the British minister, it would seem impossible that any difference of opinion could exist among intelligent men, not under the dominion of a blind infatuation. Accordingly it was agreed in the cabinet, without a dissenting voice, that the jurisdiction of every independent nation, within the limits of its own territory, being of a nature to exclude the exercise of any authority therein by a foreign power, the proceedings complained of, not being warranted by any treaty, were usurpations of national sovereignty, and violations of neutral rights, a repetition of which it was the duty of the government to prevent.

On many of the points raised by Mr. Genet's actions and the British minister's memorials, it seems impossible for any reasonable person, not blinded by bias, to disagree. As a result, the cabinet unanimously agreed that the authority of every independent nation within its own territory inherently excludes foreign powers from exercising any authority there. The actions that were questioned, not backed by any treaty, were seen as overreaches of national sovereignty and violations of neutral rights, and it was the government’s responsibility to prevent any repeat of such actions.

It was also agreed that the efficacy of the laws should be tried against those citizens of the United States who had joined in perpetrating the offence.

It was also agreed that the effectiveness of the laws should be tested against those citizens of the United States who participated in committing the offense.

Opinions of the Cabinet in relation thereto.

The question of restitution, except as to the Grange, was more dubious. The secretary of state and the attorney general contended that, if the commissions granted by Mr. Genet were invalid, the captures were totally void, and the courts would adjudge the property to remain in the former owners. In this point of view, therefore, there being a regular remedy at law, it would be irregular for the government to interpose.

The issue of restitution, except for the Grange, was more uncertain. The secretary of state and the attorney general argued that if the commissions issued by Mr. Genet were invalid, the captures would be completely null, and the courts would rule that the property should stay with the original owners. From this perspective, since there was a proper legal remedy, it would be inappropriate for the government to intervene.

If, on the contrary, the commissions were good, then, the captures having been made on the high seas, under a valid commission from a power at war with Great Britain, the original right of the British owner was, by the laws of war, transferred to the captor.

If, on the other hand, the commissions were valid, then, since the captures happened on the high seas, under a legitimate commission from a country at war with Great Britain, the original rights of the British owner were, according to the laws of war, transferred to the captor.

The legal right being in the captor, it could only be taken from him by an act of force, that is to say, of reprisal for the offence committed against the United States in the port of Charleston. Reprisal is a very serious thing, ought always to be preceded by a demand and refusal of satisfaction, is generally considered as an act of war, and never yet failed to produce it in the case of a nation able to make war.

The legal claim belongs to the captor, and it can only be taken away from him by a forceful act, that is, in retaliation for the offense committed against the United States in the port of Charleston. Retaliation is a very serious matter, should always be preceded by a demand and a refusal for satisfaction, is generally regarded as an act of war, and has never failed to lead to war in the case of a nation capable of waging it.

 

Martha Washington

Martha Washington

From the portrait by James Sharples

From the portrait by James Sharples

This is one of the three Sharples portraits of the Washington family and the only good profile of Martha Washington that was painted from life. Martha, who was a few months younger than her husband, is described as having been "amiable in character and lovely in person." By the courtesy of the period she was called Lady Washington, and whether in her own home or at the "federal court," she presided with marked dignity and grace. She died at Mount Vernon, May 22, 1802, having survived her husband two and a half years.

This is one of three portraits of the Washington family painted by Sharples, and it's the only decent profile of Martha Washington that was done from life. Martha, who was a few months younger than her husband, is described as being "kindhearted and attractive." Out of respect for the time, she was referred to as Lady Washington, and whether at home or at the "federal court," she carried herself with notable dignity and grace. She passed away at Mount Vernon on May 22, 1802, having lived two and a half years longer than her husband.

Courtesy Herbert L. Pratt

Thanks to Herbert L. Pratt

 

Admitting the case to be of sufficient importance to require reprisal, and to be ripe for that step, the power of taking it was vested by the constitution in congress, not in the executive department of the government.

Admitting that the situation is significant enough to need a response and is ready for that action, the authority to address it is granted by the constitution to Congress, not to the executive branch of the government.

Of the reparation for the offence committed against the United States, they were themselves the judges, and could not be required by a foreign nation, to demand more than was satisfactory to themselves. By disavowing the act, by taking measures to prevent its repetition, by prosecuting the American citizens who were engaged in it, the United States ought to stand justified with Great Britain; and a demand of further reparation by that power would be a wrong on her part.

Of the compensation for the offense committed against the United States, they were the ones to judge it and couldn’t be pressured by a foreign country to ask for more than what was acceptable to them. By rejecting the act, taking steps to ensure it doesn’t happen again, and prosecuting the American citizens involved, the United States should be justified in the eyes of Great Britain; and any further demand for compensation from that country would be unreasonable on their part.

The circumstances under which these equipments had been made, in the first moments of the war, before the government could have time to take precautions against them, and its immediate disapprobation of those equipments, must rescue it from every imputation of being accessory to them, and had placed it with the offended, not the offending party.

The situations in which this equipment was created, in the early days of the war, before the government had time to take measures against it, along with its quick disapproval of that equipment, must clear it of any accusations of being involved in it and positioned it with those who were wronged, not those who did wrong.

Those gentlemen were therefore of opinion, that the vessels which had been captured on the high seas, and brought into the United States, by privateers fitted out and commissioned in their ports, ought not to be restored.

Those gentlemen believed that the ships captured in international waters and brought into the United States by privateers equipped and authorized in their ports should not be returned.

The secretaries of the treasury, and of war, were of different opinion. They urged that a neutral, permitting itself to be made an instrument of hostility by one belligerent against another, became thereby an associate in the war. If land or naval armaments might be formed by France within the United States, for the purpose of carrying on expeditions against her enemy, and might return with the spoils they had taken, and prepare new enterprises, it was apparent that a state of war would exist between America and those enemies, of the worst kind for them: since, while the resources of the country were employed in annoying them, the instruments of this annoyance would be occasionally protected from pursuit, by the privileges of an ostensible neutrality. It was easy to see that such a state of things could not be tolerated longer than until it should be perceived.

The secretaries of the treasury and war had different views. They argued that if a neutral country allows itself to be used as a tool for one side in a conflict against another, it becomes an ally in the war. If France could set up land or naval forces in the United States to launch attacks against its enemy and return with the loot they collected to plan more operations, it was clear that a state of war would exist between America and those enemies, and it would be very harmful for them. While the country's resources were used to undermine their enemies, those carrying out the attacks would sometimes be shielded from retaliation due to the facade of neutrality. It was clear that this situation couldn't be allowed to continue once it was recognized.

It being confessedly contrary to the duty of the United States, as a neutral nation, to suffer privateers to be fitted in their ports to annoy the British trade, it seemed to follow that it would comport with their duty, to remedy the injury which may have been sustained, when it is in their power so to do.

It is openly acknowledged that it goes against the responsibility of the United States, as a neutral nation, to allow privateers to be equipped in their ports to disrupt British trade. Therefore, it seems that it would be appropriate for them to address the damage that may have occurred, assuming they have the ability to do so.

That the fact had been committed before the government could provide against it might be an excuse, but not a justification. Every government is responsible for the conduct of all parts of the community over which it presides, and is supposed to possess, at all times, the means of preventing infractions of its duty to foreign nations. In the present instance, the magistracy of the place ought to have prevented them. However valid this excuse might have been, had the privateers expedited from Charleston been sent to the French dominions, there to operate out of the reach of the United States, it could be of no avail when their prizes were brought into the American ports, and the government, thereby, completely enabled to administer a specific remedy for the injury.

That the incident happened before the government could take action might be an excuse, but it’s not a justification. Every government is accountable for the actions of all parts of the community it oversees and is expected to always have the means to prevent violations of its duties to foreign nations. In this case, the local authorities should have prevented these actions. Even if this excuse were valid, had the privateers sent from Charleston been allowed to operate in French territories, outside U.S. jurisdiction, it wouldn't matter once their captures were brought into American ports, where the government could effectively address the damage caused.

Although the commissions, and the captures made under them, were valid as between the parties at war, they were not so as to the United States. For the violation of their rights, they had a claim to reparation, and might reasonably demand, as the reparation to which they were entitled, restitution of the property taken, with or without an apology for the infringement of their sovereignty. This they had a right to demand as a species of reparation consonant with the nature of the injury, and enabling them to do justice to the party in injuring whom they had been made instrumental. It could be no just cause of complaint on the part of the captors that they were required to surrender a property, the means of acquiring which took their origin in a violation of the rights of the United States.

Although the commissions and the captures made under them were valid between the warring parties, they weren't valid concerning the United States. For the violation of their rights, the U.S. had a claim for compensation and could reasonably demand restitution of the property taken, with or without an apology for the infringement of their sovereignty. This was something they had the right to demand as a form of compensation fitting to the nature of the injury, allowing them to do justice to the party harmed by their involvement. The captors could not justifiably complain about being required to return property that was obtained through a violation of U.S. rights.

On the other hand, there was a claim on the American government to arrest the effects of the injury or annoyance to which it had been made accessory. To insist therefore on the restitution of the property taken, would be to enforce a right, in order to the performance of a duty.

On the other hand, there was a demand on the American government to address the harm or inconvenience it had contributed to. Therefore, insisting on the return of the property taken would mean enforcing a right in order to fulfill a duty.

These commissions, though void as to the United States, being valid as between the parties, the case was not proper for the decision of the courts of justice. The whole was an affair between the governments of the parties concerned, to be settled by reasons of state, not rules of law. It was the case of an infringement of national sovereignty to the prejudice of a third party, in which the government was to demand a reparation, with the double view of vindicating its own rights, and of doing justice to the suffering party.

These agreements, while invalid for the United States, were legitimate between the involved parties, making the case unsuitable for judicial decision. This was entirely a matter between the governments of the parties involved, which should be resolved through diplomatic means rather than legal rules. It was a situation where national sovereignty was violated to the detriment of a third party, and the government was to seek compensation, aiming both to uphold its own rights and to deliver justice to the affected party.

They, therefore, were of opinion that, in the case stated for their consideration, restitution ought to be made.

They believed that, in the case presented for their consideration, restitution should be made.

On the point respecting which his cabinet was divided, the President took time to deliberate. Those principles on which a concurrence of sentiment had been manifested being considered as settled, the secretary of state was desired to communicate them to the ministers of France and Britain; and circular letters were addressed to the executives of the several states, requiring their co-operation, with force if necessary, in the execution of the rules which were established.

On the issue that divided his cabinet, the President took time to think it over. The principles that everyone agreed on were considered settled, so the Secretary of State was asked to share them with the ministers of France and Britain. Circular letters were sent to the governors of the various states, asking for their cooperation, even with force if needed, in carrying out the established rules.

The citizen Genet was much dissatisfied with these decisions of the American government. He thought them contrary to natural right, and subversive of the treaties by which the two nations were connected. In his exposition of these treaties, he claimed, for his own country, all that the two nations were restricted from conceding to others, thereby converting negative limitations into an affirmative grant of privileges to France.

The citizen Genet was very unhappy with these decisions of the American government. He believed they were against natural rights and undermined the treaties that linked the two nations. In his explanation of these treaties, he asserted that his own country was entitled to everything the two nations were not allowed to give to others, thus turning negative restrictions into a positive grant of privileges to France.

Without noticing a want of decorum in some of the expressions which Mr. Genet had employed, he was informed that the subjects on which his letter treated had, from respect to him, been reconsidered by the executive; but that no cause was perceived for changing the system which had been adopted. He was further informed that, in the opinion of the President, the United States owed it to themselves, and to the nations in their friendship, to expect, as a reparation for the offence of infringing their sovereignty, that the vessels, thus illegally equipped, would depart from their ports.

Without noticing any lack of decorum in some of the phrases Mr. Genet had used, he was told that the issues addressed in his letter had been reconsidered by the executive out of respect for him; however, there was no reason found to change the adopted policy. He was also informed that, in the President's view, the United States owed it to themselves and to their friendly nations to expect that, as a way to make up for the violation of their sovereignty, the ships that were improperly outfitted would leave their ports.

Mr. Genet was not disposed to acquiesce in these decisions. Adhering to his own construction of the existing treaty, he affected to consider the measures of the American government as infractions of it, which no power in the nation had a right to make, unless the United States in congress assembled should determine that their solemn engagements should no longer be performed. Intoxicated with the sentiments expressed by a great portion of the people, and unacquainted with the firm character of the executive, he seems to have expected that the popularity of his nation would enable him to overthrow that department, or to render it subservient to his views. It is difficult otherwise to account for his persisting to disregard its decisions, and for passages with which his letters abound, such as the following:

Mr. Genet wasn't willing to accept these decisions. Sticking to his own interpretation of the current treaty, he pretended to see the American government's actions as violations of it, which no one in the country had the authority to enact unless the United States Congress decided that they would no longer honor their commitments. Overwhelmed by the support from a significant part of the population and unaware of the strong character of the executive branch, he seemed to believe that the popularity of his country would allow him to undermine that department or make it work for his agenda. It’s hard to explain his continued dismissal of its decisions and the various statements in his letters, like the following:

"Every obstruction by the government of the United States to the arming of French vessels must be an attempt on the rights of man, upon which repose the independence and laws of the United States; a violation of the ties which unite the people of France and America; and even a manifest contradiction of the system of neutrality of the President; for, in fact, if our merchant vessels,[5] or others, are not allowed to arm themselves, when the French alone are resisting the league of all the tyrants against the liberty of the people, they will be exposed to inevitable ruin in going out of the ports of the United States, which is certainly not the intention of the people of America. Their fraternal voice has resounded from every quarter around me, and their accents are not equivocal. They are pure as the hearts of those by whom they are expressed, and the more they have touched my sensibility, the more they must interest in the happiness of America the nation I represent;—the more I wish, sir, that the federal government should observe, as far as in their power, the public engagements contracted by both nations; and that, by this generous and prudent conduct, they will give at least to the world, the example of a true neutrality, which does not consist in the cowardly abandonment of their friends in the moment when danger menaces them, but in adhering strictly, if they can do no better, to the obligations they have contracted with them. It is by such proceedings that they will render themselves respectable to all the powers; that they will preserve their friends and deserve to augment their numbers."

"Any blockage by the U.S. government against arming French ships is an attack on human rights, which are the foundation of the independence and laws of the United States; it violates the bond between the people of France and America; and it contradicts the President's declared neutrality. If our merchant ships or others aren't allowed to arm themselves while the French are the only ones fighting against the coalition of tyrants threatening people's freedom, they will face certain destruction when leaving U.S. ports, which is definitely not what the American people want. Their supportive voices echo from all around me, and their messages are clear. They are as genuine as the hearts of those who express them, and the more they resonate with my emotions, the more they inspire concern for the happiness of America, the nation I represent. I wish, sir, that the federal government would, as much as possible, honor the public commitments made by both nations. By demonstrating this generous and wise behavior, they would show the world what true neutrality looks like—not the cowardly abandonment of friends in times of danger, but a strict adherence to the obligations they have taken on with them. Such actions would earn them respect from all nations and help maintain their friendships while deserving to expand their ranks."

A few days previous to the reception of the letter from which the above is an extract, two citizens of the United States, who had been engaged by Mr. Genet in Charleston to cruise in the service of France, were arrested by the civil magistrate, in pursuance of the determination formed by the executive for the prosecution of persons having thus offended against the laws. Mr. Genet demanded their release in the following extraordinary terms:

A few days before receiving the letter from which the above is an excerpt, two citizens of the United States, who had been hired by Mr. Genet in Charleston to sail for France, were arrested by the local authorities, following a decision made by the government to prosecute those who had violated the law in this way. Mr. Genet requested their release in the following unusual terms:

"I have this moment been informed that two officers in the service of the republic of France, citizen Gideon Henfield and John Singletary, have been arrested on board the privateer of the French republic, the Citizen Genet, and conducted to prison. The crime laid to their charge—the crime which my mind can not conceive, and which my pen almost refuses to state,—is the serving of France, and defending with her children the common glorious cause of liberty.

"I just learned that two officers serving the republic of France, Citizen Gideon Henfield and John Singletary, have been arrested on the privateer of the French republic, the Citizen Genet, and taken to prison. The crime they're accused of—the crime that I can hardly understand, and which is difficult to even write down—is serving France and defending the shared, glorious cause of liberty alongside her citizens."

"Being ignorant of any positive law or treaty which deprives Americans of this privilege, and authorizes officers of police arbitrarily to take mariners in the service of France from on board their vessels, I call upon your intervention, sir, and that of the President of the United States, in order to obtain the immediate releasement of the above mentioned officers, who have acquired, by the sentiments animating them, and by the act of their engagement, anterior to every act to the contrary, the right of French citizens, if they have lost that of American citizens."

"Not knowing of any law or treaty that takes away the rights of Americans and allows police officers to arbitrarily remove sailors working for France from their ships, I urge you, sir, and the President of the United States, to step in and secure the immediate release of the officers mentioned above. They have gained, through their intentions and their commitment before any opposing actions took place, the rights of French citizens, if they have lost their rights as American citizens."

This lofty offensive style could not fail to make a deep impression on a mind penetrated with a just sense of those obligations by which the chief magistrate is bound to guard the dignity of his government, and to take care that his nation be not degraded in his person. Yet, in no single instance, did the administration, in its communications with Mr. Genet, permit itself to be betrayed into the use of one intemperate expression. The firmness with which the extravagant pretensions of that gentleman were resisted, proceeding entirely from a sense of duty and conviction of right, was unaccompanied with any marks of that resentment which his language and his conduct were alike calculated to inspire.

This bold approach couldn't help but leave a strong impression on anyone who understood the responsibilities that come with being the leader of a government, particularly the need to protect its dignity and ensure that the nation isn't embarrassed by their actions. However, in every interaction with Mr. Genet, the administration never allowed itself to react with any harsh words. The way they firmly pushed back against his unreasonable demands came solely from a sense of duty and a belief in what was right, without showing any signs of the anger that his words and actions would typically provoke.

State of parties.

Mr. Genet appears to have been prevented from acquiescing in a line of conduct thus deliberately adopted and prudently pursued, by a belief that the sentiments of the people were in direct opposition to the measures of their government. So excessive, and so general, were the demonstrations of enthusiastic devotion to France; so open were their expressions of outrage and hostility towards all the powers at war with that republic; so thin was the veil which covered the chief magistrate from that stream of malignant opprobrium directed against every measure which thwarted the views of Mr. Genet; that a person less sanguine than that minister might have cherished the hope of being able ultimately to triumph over the opposition to his designs. Civic festivals, and other public assemblages of people, at which the ensigns of France were displayed in union with those of America; at which the red cap, as a symbol of French liberty and fraternity, triumphantly passed from head to head; at which toasts were given expressive of a desire to identify the people of America with those of France; and, under the imposing guise of adhering to principles not to men, containing allusions to the influence of the President which could not be mistaken; appeared to Mr. Genet to indicate a temper extremely favourable to his hopes, and very different from that which would be required for the preservation of an honest neutrality. Through the medium of the press, these sentiments were communicated to the public, and were represented as flowing from the hearts of the great body of the people. In various other modes, that important engine contributed its powerful aid to the extension of opinions, calculated, essentially, to vary the situation of the United States. The proclamation of neutrality which was treated as a royal edict, was not only considered as assuming powers not belonging to the executive, and, as evidencing the monarchical tendencies of that department, but as demonstrating the disposition of the government to break its connexions with France, and to dissolve the friendship which united the people of the two republics. The declaration that "the duty and interest of the United States required that they should with sincerity and good faith adopt and pursue a conduct friendly and impartial towards the belligerent powers," gave peculiar umbrage. The scenes of the revolutionary war were brought into review; the object and effect of British hostility were painted in glowing colours; and the important aids afforded by France were drawn with a pencil not less animated. That the conduct of Britain, since the treaty of peace had furnished unequivocal testimony of enmity to the United States, was strongly pressed. With this continuing enmity was contrasted the amicable dispositions professed by the French republic; and it was asked with indignation, whether the interests of the United States required that they should pursue "a line of conduct entirely impartial between these two powers? That the services of the one as well as the injuries of the other, should be forgotten? that a friend and an enemy should be treated with equal favour? and that neither gratitude nor resentment should constitute a feature of the American character?" The supposed freedom of the French was opposed to the imagined slavery of the English; and it was demanded whether "the people of America were alike friendly to republicanism and to monarchy? to liberty and to despotism?"

Mr. Genet seems to have held back from going along with a course of action that was carefully chosen and wisely followed because he believed that the people's feelings were completely against their government's actions. The displays of passionate support for France were overwhelming and widespread; the public openly expressed their outrage and anger towards all the countries at war with that republic; the barrier separating the president from the wave of harsh criticism aimed at every action that opposed Mr. Genet’s plans was very thin. Someone less optimistic than that minister might have hoped to eventually overcome the resistance to his agenda. Civic festivals and other public gatherings featured the flags of France along with those of America; the red cap, symbolizing French liberty and brotherhood, joyfully passed from person to person; cheers were raised expressing a wish to connect the American people with the French; and under the grand pretense of adhering to principles rather than individuals, there were nods to the President's influence that could not be misunderstood. This all led Mr. Genet to believe that the mood was very favorable to his hopes and quite different from what would be needed to maintain honest neutrality. Through the press, these feelings were shared with the public, portrayed as coming from the hearts of a large portion of the population. In various other ways, that crucial tool aided in spreading views likely to significantly change the situation of the United States. The neutrality proclamation, seen as a royal decree, was perceived not only as an overreach of executive power, hinting at monarchical tendencies, but also as a sign that the government was looking to sever ties with France and break the friendship between the two republics. The assertion that "the duty and interest of the United States required them to honestly and fairly adopt a friendly and impartial stance towards the warring powers," was particularly offensive. The events of the revolutionary war were recalled; British hostility was vividly highlighted; and the vital support provided by France was depicted in equally animated terms. It was strongly argued that Britain’s actions since the peace treaty clearly showed hostility towards the United States. This ongoing enmity was contrasted with the friendly intentions claimed by the French republic; and it was indignantly asked whether the interests of the United States called for pursuing "a stance that is completely impartial towards these two powers? Should the contributions of one and the grievances of the other be ignored? Should a friend and an enemy receive the same treatment? And shouldn’t gratitude or resentment shape the American character?" The supposed freedom of the French contrasted sharply with the imagined oppression of the English, and it was questioned whether "the American people were equally supportive of republicanism and monarchy? Of liberty and despotism?"

With infectious enthusiasm it was contended, that there was a natural and inveterate hostility between monarchies and republics; that the present combination against France was a combination against liberty in every part of the world; and that the destinies of America were inseparably linked with those of the French republic.

With infectious enthusiasm, it was argued that there was a natural and deep-rooted hostility between monarchies and republics; that the current alliance against France was an alliance against freedom everywhere; and that America's future was tightly connected to that of the French republic.

On the various points of controversy which had arisen between the executive and Mr. Genet, this active and powerful party openly and decidedly embraced the principles for which that minister contended. It was assumed that his demands were sanctioned by subsisting treaties, and that his exposition of those instruments was perfectly correct. The conduct of the executive in withholding privileges to which France was said to be entitled by the most solemn engagements, was reprobated with extreme acrimony; was considered as indicative of a desire to join the coalesced despots in their crusade against liberty; and as furnishing to the French republic such just motives for war, that it required all her moderation and forbearance to restrain her from declaring it against the United States.

On the various controversies that came up between the executive and Mr. Genet, this active and influential group openly and confidently supported the principles he was advocating. It was believed that his demands were backed by existing treaties and that his interpretation of those agreements was completely accurate. The executive's decision to deny privileges that France was said to be entitled to under the most serious commitments was criticized harshly; it was seen as a sign of a desire to side with the united tyrants in their fight against freedom, and it gave the French republic justifiable reasons for war, making it necessary for them to exercise significant restraint and patience to avoid declaring war on the United States.

Mr. Genet was exhorted not to relax in his endeavours to maintain the just rights of his country; and was assured that, in the affections of the people, he would find a firm and certain support.

Mr. Genet was encouraged not to ease up in his efforts to uphold the rightful claims of his country; and he was promised that, in the people's loyalty, he would find steadfast and reliable support.

These principles and opinions derived considerable aid from the labours and intrigues of certain societies, who had constituted themselves the guardians of American liberty.

These principles and views received significant support from the efforts and schemes of certain groups that had positioned themselves as the protectors of American freedom.

The manner in which that attention of the conduct of those invested with the power which is essential in balanced governments, may safely be employed, had been so misconceived, that temporary and detached clubs of citizens had occasionally been formed in different parts of the United States, for the avowed purpose of watching the conduct of their rulers. After the adoption of the constitution, some slight use was made, by its enemies, of this weapon; and, in the German Republican Society particularly, many of the most strenuous opponents of the administration were collected.

The way in which the attention towards the behavior of those in power—essential for balanced governments—could be safely utilized has been so misunderstood that temporary and separate citizen groups have been formed in various parts of the United States, with the stated goal of monitoring the actions of their leaders. Following the adoption of the constitution, this tactic was slightly exploited by its opponents, and in the German Republican Society in particular, many of the fiercest critics of the administration gathered.

Democratic societies formed.

The force and power of these institutions had been fully developed, and their efficacy in prostrating existing establishments clearly ascertained by the revolution in France. The increased influence which they derived from corresponding with each other, had been unequivocally demonstrated; and soon after the arrival of Mr. Genet, a democratic society was formed in Philadelphia on the model of the Jacobin club in Paris. An anxious solicitude for the preservation of freedom, the very existence of which was menaced by a "European confederacy transcendent in power and unparalleled in iniquity;" which was endangered also by "the pride of wealth and arrogance of power," displayed within the United States; was the motive assigned for the association. "A constant circulation of useful information, and a liberal communication of republican sentiments, were thought to be the best antidotes to any political poison with which the vital principle of civil liberty might be attacked:" and to give the more extensive operation to their labours, a corresponding committee was appointed, through whom they would communicate with other societies, which might be established on similar principles, throughout the United States.

The strength and influence of these institutions had been fully realized, and their ability to undermine existing systems was clearly proven by the revolution in France. The increased power they gained by connecting with each other was unmistakably shown. Shortly after Mr. Genet's arrival, a democratic society was created in Philadelphia modeled after the Jacobin club in Paris. A deep concern for the preservation of freedom, which was threatened by a "European confederacy more powerful and unprecedented in corruption," and also endangered by "the pride of wealth and arrogance of power" seen within the United States, motivated the formation of the association. "A constant flow of useful information and open sharing of republican ideas were considered the best defenses against any political threats to the core principle of civil liberty:" to make their efforts more effective, a corresponding committee was set up to communicate with other societies that might form on similar principles across the United States.

Faithful to their founder, and true to the real objects of their association, these societies continued, during the term of their existence, to be the resolute champions of all the encroachments attempted by the agents of the French republic on the government of the United States, and the steady defamers of the views and measures of the American executive.

Faithful to their founder and committed to the true purpose of their organization, these societies remained, throughout their existence, strong defenders against all the attempts by the agents of the French republic to undermine the government of the United States, and consistent critics of the ideals and actions of the American administration.

Thus strongly supported, Mr. Genet persisted in his construction of the treaties between the two nations; and, in defiance of the positive determination of the government, continued to act according to that construction.

Thus strongly backed, Mr. Genet continued to interpret the treaties between the two nations; and, despite the government's clear decision, he kept acting according to that interpretation.

The President was called to Mount Vernon by urgent business, which detained him less than three weeks; and, in his absence, the heads of departments superintended the execution of those rules which had been previously established.

The President was called to Mount Vernon for urgent matters, which kept him away for less than three weeks; during his absence, the department heads oversaw the implementation of the rules that had already been set.

In this short interval, a circumstance occurred, strongly marking the rashness of the minister of France, and his disrespect to the executive of the United States.

In this brief period, an event happened that clearly highlighted the recklessness of the French minister and his disrespect toward the U.S. executive.

The Little Sarah, an English merchantman, had been captured by a French frigate, and brought into the port of Philadelphia, where she was completely equipped as a privateer, and was just about to sail on a cruise under the name of le petit Democrat, when the secretary of the treasury communicated her situation to the secretaries of state and of war; in consequence of which, Governor Mifflin was desired to cause an examination of the fact. The warden of the port was directed to institute the proper inquiries; and late in the evening of the sixth of July, he reported her situation, and that she was to sail the next day.

The Little Sarah, an English merchant ship, had been seized by a French frigate and brought into the port of Philadelphia, where she was fully outfitted as a privateer. She was just about to set sail on a mission under the name of le petit Democrat when the secretary of the treasury informed the secretaries of state and war about her situation; as a result, Governor Mifflin was asked to ensure an investigation into the matter. The port warden was instructed to conduct the necessary inquiries, and late on the evening of July 6th, he reported her status and that she was set to sail the following day.

Genet calculates upon the partialities of the American people for France and openly insults their government.

In pursuance of the instructions which had been given by the President, the governor immediately sent Mr. Secretary Dallas for the purpose of prevailing on Mr. Genet to relieve him from the employment of force, by detaining the vessel in port until the arrival of the President, who was then on his way from Mount Vernon. Mr. Dallas communicated this message to the French minister in terms as conciliatory as its nature would permit. On receiving it, he gave a loose to the most extravagant passion. After exclaiming with vehemence against the measure, he complained, in strong terms, and with many angry epithets, of the ill treatment which he had received from some of the officers of the general government, which he contrasted with the cordial attachment that was expressed by the people at large for his nation. He ascribed the conduct of those officers to principles inimical to the cause of France, and of liberty. He insinuated that, by their influence, the President had been misled; and observed with considerable emphasis, that the President was not the sovereign of this country. The powers of peace and war being vested in congress, it belonged to that body to decide those questions growing out of treaties which might involve peace or war; and the President, therefore, ought to have assembled the national legislature before he ventured to issue his proclamation of neutrality, or to prohibit, by his instructions to the state governors, the enjoyment of the particular rights which France claimed under the express stipulations of the treaty of commerce. The executive construction of that treaty was neither just nor obligatory; and he would make no engagement which might be construed into a relinquishment of rights which his constituents deemed indispensable. In the course of this vehement and angry declamation, he spoke of publishing his correspondence with the officers of government, together with a narrative of his proceedings; and said that, although the existing causes would warrant an abrupt departure, his regard for the people of America would induce him to remain here, amidst the insults and disgusts that he daily suffered in his official character from the public officers, until the meeting of congress; and if that body should agree in the opinions and support the measures of the President, he would certainly withdraw, and leave the dispute to be adjusted between the two nations themselves. His attention being again called by Mr. Dallas to the particular subject, he peremptorily refused to enter into any arrangements for suspending the departure of the privateer, and cautioned him against any attempt to seize her, as she belonged to the republic; and, in defence of the honour of her flag, would unquestionably repel force by force.

In line with the instructions given by the President, the governor quickly sent Mr. Secretary Dallas to persuade Mr. Genet to stop using force by keeping the vessel in port until the President arrived, who was on his way from Mount Vernon. Mr. Dallas conveyed this message to the French minister in the most conciliatory terms possible. Upon receiving it, he let loose with extreme anger. He vehemently protested against the action, expressing strong complaints and numerous angry remarks about the mistreatment he felt from some officers of the general government, which he contrasted with the warm support shown by the general public for his country. He blamed the behavior of those officers on principles hostile to France and liberty. He implied that the President had been misled by their influence, and he pointedly remarked that the President was not the sovereign of this country. Since the powers of peace and war were granted to Congress, it was up to that body to resolve issues arising from treaties that could affect peace or war; thus, the President should have called the national legislature together before issuing his neutrality proclamation or instructing state governors to deny France the specific rights outlined in the treaty of commerce. The executive interpretation of that treaty was neither fair nor binding; he would not make any commitments that could be seen as giving up rights that his constituents viewed as essential. Throughout his passionate and angry speech, he mentioned publishing his correspondence with government officials, along with a summary of his actions; he stated that although circumstances would justify a sudden departure, his respect for the American people would lead him to stay here, enduring the daily insults and offenses suffered in his official role, until Congress met. If that body supported the President's views and measures, he would definitely withdraw and let the two nations settle their dispute on their own. When Mr. Dallas again brought up the specific topic, he firmly refused to make any arrangements to delay the privateer's departure and warned him against any attempt to seize it, asserting that it belonged to the republic and would certainly defend its flag with force if necessary.

On receiving the report of Mr. Dallas, Governor Mifflin ordered out one hundred and twenty militia, for the purpose of taking possession of the privateer; and communicated the case, with all its circumstances, to the officers of the executive government. On the succeeding day, Mr. Jefferson waited on Mr. Genet, in the hope of prevailing on him to pledge his word that the privateer should not leave the port until the arrival of the President. The minister was not less intemperate with Mr. Jefferson than he had been with Mr. Dallas. He indulged himself, in a repetition of nearly the same passionate language, and again spoke, with extreme harshness, of the conduct of the executive. He persisted in refusing to make any engagements for the detention of the vessel; and, after his rage had in some degree spent itself, he entreated that no attempt might be made to take possession of her, as her crew was on board, and force would be repelled by force.

On receiving Mr. Dallas's report, Governor Mifflin called up one hundred and twenty militia to seize the privateer and informed the executive government officials about the situation and all its details. The next day, Mr. Jefferson met with Mr. Genet, hoping to convince him to promise that the privateer wouldn’t leave the port until the President arrived. The minister was just as unreasonable with Mr. Jefferson as he had been with Mr. Dallas. He unleashed nearly the same furious language and harshly criticized the actions of the executive. He continued to refuse to commit to keeping the vessel from leaving; and, after his anger had calmed down somewhat, he pleaded that no attempts be made to seize the ship, as her crew was onboard, and any force used would be met with force.

He then also said that she was not ready to sail immediately. She would change her position, and fall down the river a small distance on that day; but was not yet ready to sail.

He then said that she wasn't ready to set sail right away. She would shift her position and drift down the river a short distance that day, but she wasn't yet prepared to sail.

In communicating this conversation to Governor Mifflin, Mr. Jefferson stated his conviction that the privateer would remain in the river until the President should decide on her case; in consequence of which, the governor dismissed the militia, and requested the advice of the heads of departments on the course which it would be proper for him to pursue. Both the governor and Mr. Jefferson stated, that in reporting the conversation between Mr. Genet and himself, Mr. Dallas had said that Mr. Genet threatened, in express terms, "to appeal from the President to the people."

In relaying this conversation to Governor Mifflin, Mr. Jefferson expressed his belief that the privateer would stay in the river until the President made a decision about her situation. As a result, the governor called off the militia and sought the advice of the department heads on what actions he should take. Both the governor and Mr. Jefferson mentioned that while sharing the discussion between Mr. Genet and himself, Mr. Dallas reported that Mr. Genet explicitly threatened "to appeal from the President to the people."

Thus braved and insulted in the very heart of the American empire, the secretaries of the treasury, and of war, were of opinion that it was expedient to take immediate provisional measures for establishing a battery on Mud Island, under cover of a party of militia, with directions, that if the vessel should attempt to depart before the pleasure of the President should be known concerning her, military coercion should be employed to arrest her progress.

Thus challenged and insulted in the very heart of the American empire, the secretaries of the treasury and of war believed it was necessary to take immediate temporary measures to set up a battery on Mud Island, with support from a group of militia, instructing that if the vessel tried to leave before the President's decision regarding her was known, military force should be used to stop her.

The secretary of state dissenting from this opinion, the measure was not adopted. The vessel fell down to Chester before the arrival of the President, and sailed on her cruise before the power of the government could be interposed.

The secretary of state disagreed with this opinion, so the measure wasn't passed. The ship went to Chester before the President arrived and set off on her journey before the government could intervene.

On the 11th of July the President reached Philadelphia, and requested that his cabinet ministers would convene at his house the next day at nine in the morning.

On July 11th, the President arrived in Philadelphia and asked his cabinet ministers to meet at his house the next day at nine in the morning.

Among the papers placed in his hands by the secretary of state, which required immediate attention, were those which related to the Little Democrat. On reading them, a messenger was immediately despatched for the secretary, but he had retired, indisposed, to his seat in the country. Upon hearing this, the President instantly addressed a letter to him, of which the following is an extract. "What is to be done in the case of the Little Sarah, now at Chester? Is the minister of the French republic to set the acts of this government at defiance with impunity—and then threaten the executive with an appeal to the people? What must the world think of such conduct? and of the government of the United States in submitting to it?

Among the papers handed to him by the secretary of state that needed immediate attention were the ones about the Little Democrat. After reading them, a messenger was quickly sent for the secretary, but he had gone to his country residence due to feeling unwell. Upon hearing this, the President immediately wrote him a letter, of which the following is an extract: "What should we do about the Little Sarah, currently in Chester? Is the minister of the French republic allowed to ignore the actions of our government without facing any consequences—and then threaten the executive with an appeal to the public? What will the world think of such behavior? And what will they think of the United States government for putting up with it?"

"These are serious questions—circumstances press for decision;—and as you have had time to consider them, (upon me they come unexpectedly,) I wish to know your opinion upon them even before to-morrow—for the vessel may then be gone."

"These are serious questions—circumstances are demanding a decision;—and since you’ve had time to think about them, (I’m facing them unexpectedly,) I’d like to know your opinion on them even before tomorrow—because the ship might leave by then."

In answer to this letter, the secretary stated the assurances which had on that day been given to him by Mr. Genet, that the vessel would not sail before the President's decision respecting her should be made. In consequence of this information, immediate coercive measures were suspended; and in the council of the succeeding day it was determined to retain in port all[6] privateers which had been equipped by any of the belligerent powers within the United States. This determination was immediately communicated to Mr. Genet; but, in contempt of it, the Little Democrat proceeded on her cruise.

In response to this letter, the secretary mentioned the assurances that Mr. Genet had given him that day, stating that the vessel wouldn't leave until the President made a decision about it. Because of this information, immediate aggressive actions were put on hold; and in the council the next day, it was decided to keep in port all[6] privateers equipped by any of the warring powers within the United States. This decision was quickly communicated to Mr. Genet; however, disregarding it, the Little Democrat set out on her cruise.

In this, as in every effort made by the executive to maintain the neutrality of the United States, that great party which denominated itself "THE PEOPLE," could perceive only a settled hostility to France and to liberty, a tame subserviency to British policy, and a desire, by provoking France, to engage America in the war, for the purpose of extirpating republican principles.[7]

In this, like in every attempt by the executive to keep the United States neutral, that major party calling itself "THE PEOPLE" could see nothing but a clear hostility towards France and freedom, a submissive alignment with British policy, and a motivation to provoke France in order to draw America into the war, aiming to eliminate republican principles.[7]

The administration received strong additional evidence of the difficulty that would attend an adherence to the system which had been commenced, in the acquittal of Gideon Henfield.

The administration got strong new evidence showing the challenges that would come from sticking to the system that had started with the acquittal of Gideon Henfield.

A prosecution had been instituted against this person who had enlisted in Charleston on board a French privateer equipped in that port, which had brought her prizes into the port of Philadelphia. This prosecution had been directed under the advice of the attorney general, who was of opinion, that persons of this description were punishable for having violated subsisting treaties, which, by the constitution, are the supreme law of the land; and that they were also indictable at common law, for disturbing the peace of the United States.

A prosecution was launched against this person who had enlisted in Charleston on a French privateer outfitted in that port, which had brought its captured prizes into the port of Philadelphia. This prosecution was initiated based on the advice of the attorney general, who believed that individuals like this were punishable for violating existing treaties, which are, according to the constitution, the highest law of the land; and that they could also be charged under common law for disrupting the peace of the United States.

It could not be expected that the democratic party would be inattentive to an act so susceptible of misrepresentation. Their papers sounded the alarm; and it was universally asked, "what law had been offended, and under what statute was the indictment supported? Were the American people already prepared to give to a proclamation the force of a legislative act, and to subject themselves to the will of the executive? But if they were already sunk to such a state of degradation, were they to be punished for violating a proclamation which had not been published when the offence was committed, if indeed it could be termed an offence to engage with France, combating for liberty against the combined despots of Europe?"

It was unrealistic to think that the Democratic Party would ignore an act so prone to misinterpretation. Their publications sounded the alarm, and people everywhere asked, "What law was broken, and what statute supports the indictment? Are the American people really ready to treat a proclamation as if it were a law and submit to the executive’s authority? But if we've already sunk to such a low point, can they be punished for breaking a proclamation that wasn’t even published when the supposed offense occurred? Is it really an offense to ally with France in the fight for liberty against the united tyrants of Europe?"

As the trial approached, a great degree of sensibility was displayed; and the verdict in favour of Henfield was celebrated with extravagant marks of joy and exultation. It bereaved the executive of the strength to be derived from an opinion, that punishment might be legally inflicted on those who should openly violate the rules prescribed for the preservation of neutrality; and exposed that department to the obloquy of having attempted a measure which the laws would not justify.

As the trial neared, people showed a heightened sense of emotion; and the verdict in favor of Henfield was celebrated with overwhelming joy and excitement. It stripped the executive of the power that comes from the belief that punishment could legally be imposed on those who openly broke the rules for maintaining neutrality; and it subjected that department to criticism for attempting a measure that the laws did not support.

About this time, a question growing out of the war between France and Britain, the decision of which would materially affect the situation of the United States, was presented to the consideration of the executive.

About this time, a question arising from the war between France and Britain, the outcome of which would significantly impact the situation of the United States, was brought to the attention of the executive.

It will be recollected that during the war which separated America from Britain, the celebrated compact termed the armed neutrality was formed in the north of Europe, and announced to the belligerent powers. A willingness to acquiesce in the principles it asserted, one of which was that free bottoms should make free goods, was expressed by the governments engaged in the war, with the single exception of Great Britain. But, however favourably the United States, as a belligerent, might view a principle which would promote the interests of inferior maritime powers, they were not willing, after the termination of hostilities, to enter into engagements for its support which might endanger their future peace; and, in this spirit, instructions were given to their ministers in Europe.

It will be remembered that during the war that separated America from Britain, the well-known agreement called armed neutrality was established in northern Europe and communicated to the warring nations. The governments involved in the conflict expressed a willingness to accept the principles it outlined, one of which was that neutral ships should carry neutral goods, with the sole exception of Great Britain. However favorable the United States might view a principle that would benefit smaller maritime nations, they were not willing, after the war ended, to make commitments to support it that could jeopardize their future peace; and, with this in mind, instructions were given to their ministers in Europe.

This principle was ingrafted into the treaty of commerce with France; but no stipulation on the subject had been made with England. It followed, that, with France, the character of the bottom was imparted to the cargo; but with Britain, the law of nations was the rule by which the respective rights of the belligerent and neutral were to be decided.

This principle was included in the trade agreement with France; however, no agreement on this matter had been established with England. As a result, with France, the nature of the ship was extended to the cargo, but with Britain, international law was the guideline to determine the rights of the warring and neutral parties.

Construing this rule to give security to the goods of a friend in the bottoms of an enemy, and to subject the goods of an enemy to capture in the bottoms of a friend, the British cruisers took French property out of American vessels, and their courts condemned it as lawful prize.

Interpreting this rule to protect a friend's goods in enemy waters while allowing the capture of enemy goods in friendly waters, British cruisers took French property from American ships and their courts deemed it a legal prize.

Mr. Genet had remonstrated against the acquiescence of the American executive in this exposition of the law of nations, in such terms as he was accustomed to employ; and on the 9th of July, in the moment of the contest respecting the Little Democrat, he had written a letter demanding an immediate and positive answer to the question, what measures the President had taken, or would take, to cause the American flag to be respected? He observed, that "as the English would continue to carry off, with impunity, French citizens, and French property found on board of American vessels, without embarrassing themselves with the philosophical principles proclaimed by the President of the United States," and as the embarrassing engagements of France deprived her of the privileges of making reprisals at every point, it was necessary for the interests of both nations, quickly to agree on taking other measures.

Mr. Genet had protested against the American government's acceptance of this interpretation of international law, using the language he was used to. On July 9th, during the debate over the Little Democrat, he wrote a letter demanding an immediate and clear response to the question of what actions the President had taken, or would take, to ensure respect for the American flag. He pointed out that "since the English would continue to carry off French citizens and French property on American ships without any consequences, and without being bothered by the philosophical principles stated by the President of the United States," and since France's difficult commitments prevented her from pursuing reprisals effectively, it was crucial for both nations to quickly agree on alternative measures.

Not receiving an immediate answer, Mr. Genet, towards the close of July, again addressed the secretary of state on the subject. In this extraordinary letter, after complaining of the insults offered to the American flag by seizing the property of Frenchmen confided to its protection, he added, "your political rights are counted for nothing. In vain do the principles of neutrality establish, that friendly vessels make friendly goods; in vain, sir, does the President of the United States endeavour, by his proclamation, to reclaim the observation of this maxim; in vain does the desire of preserving peace lead to sacrifice the interests of France to that of the moment; in vain does the thirst of riches preponderate over honour in the political balance of America: all this management, all this condescension, all this humility, end in nothing; our enemies laugh at it; and the French, too confident, are punished for having believed that the American nation had a flag, that they had some respect for their laws, some conviction of their strength, and entertained some sentiment of their dignity. It is not possible for me, sir, to paint to you all my sensibility at this scandal which tends to the diminution of your commerce, to the oppression of ours, and to the debasement and vilification of republics. It is for Americans to make known their generous indignation at this outrage; and I must confine myself to demand of you a second time, to inform me of the measures which you have taken, in order to obtain restitution of the property plundered from my fellow citizens, under the protection of your flag. It is from our government they have learnt that the Americans were our allies, that the American nation was sovereign, and that they knew how to make themselves respected. It is then under the very same sanction of the French nation, that they have confided their property and persons to the safeguard of the American flag; and on her, they submit the care of causing those rights to be respected. But if our fellow citizens have been deceived, if you are not in a condition to maintain the sovereignty of your people, speak; we have guaranteed it when slaves, we shall be able to render it formidable, having become freemen."

Not getting a quick response, Mr. Genet, near the end of July, wrote to the secretary of state again about the issue. In this remarkable letter, after expressing his frustration over the insults to the American flag by seizing the property of French citizens under its protection, he added, "your political rights mean nothing. The principles of neutrality state that friendly ships carry friendly goods in vain; the President of the United States tries, through his proclamation, to enforce this principle in vain; the effort to maintain peace leads to sacrificing France's interests for momentary gains in vain; the pursuit of wealth outweighs honor in America’s political priorities: all this maneuvering, all this condescension, all this humility results in nothing; our enemies mock it, and the French, too trusting, face consequences for believing that the American nation valued its flag, respected its laws, recognized its strength, and had some sense of dignity. I cannot fully express my feelings about this scandal, which threatens to diminish your trade, oppress ours, and undermine the dignity of republics. It is up to Americans to express their righteous anger at this offense; I must repeat my request for you to inform me of the steps you are taking to recover the property that was taken from my fellow citizens under your flag's protection. It is from our government they learned that Americans were our allies, that the American nation was sovereign, and that it demanded respect. It is under the protection of the French nation that they entrusted their property and lives to the safety of the American flag; they rely on you to ensure these rights are upheld. But if our fellow citizens have been misled, if you are unable to uphold your people’s sovereignty, say so; we guaranteed it in our enslaved state, and we will make it strong now that we are free."

On the day preceding the date of this offensive letter, the secretary of state had answered that of the 9th of July; and, without noticing the unbecoming style in which the decision of the executive was demanded, had avowed and defended the opinion, that "by the general law of nations, the goods of an enemy found in the vessels of a friend are lawful prize." This fresh insult might therefore be passed over in silence.

On the day before this offensive letter, the secretary of state responded to the letter from July 9th; and, without acknowledging the inappropriate tone in which the executive's decision was requested, stated and supported the view that "according to international law, the goods of an enemy found on the ships of a friend are considered lawful prize." Therefore, this new insult could be ignored.

While a hope remained that the temperate forbearance of the executive, and the unceasing manifestations of its friendly dispositions towards the French republic, might induce the minister of that nation to respect the rights of the United States, and to abstain from violations of their sovereignty, an anxious solicitude not to impair the harmony which he wished to maintain between the two republics, had restrained the President from adopting those measures respecting Mr. Genet, which the conduct of that gentleman required. He had seen a foreign minister usurp within the territories of the United States some of the most important rights of sovereignty, and persist, after the prohibition of the government, in the exercise of those rights. In asserting this extravagant claim, so incompatible with national independence, the spirit in which it originated had been pursued, and the haughty style of a superior had been substituted for the respectful language of diplomacy. He had seen the same minister undertake to direct the civil government; and to pronounce, in opposition to the decisions of the executive, in what departments of the constitution of the United States had placed certain great national powers. To render this state of things more peculiarly critical and embarrassing, the person most instrumental in producing it, had, from his arrival, thrown himself into the arms of the people, stretched out to receive him; and was emboldened by their favour, to indulge the hope of succeeding in his endeavours, either to overthrow their government, or to bend it to his will. But the full experiment had now been made; and the result was a conviction not to be resisted, that moderation would only invite additional injuries, and that the present insufferable state of things could be terminated only by procuring the removal of the French minister, or by submitting to become, in his hands, the servile instrument of hostility against the enemies of his nation. Information was continually received from every quarter, of fresh aggressions on the principles established by the government; and, while the executive was thus openly disregarded and contemned, the members of the administration were reproached in all the papers of an active and restless opposition, as the violators of the national faith, the partisans of monarchy, and the enemies of liberty and of France.

While there was still hope that the calm patience of the executive and its constant demonstrations of goodwill towards the French Republic might persuade that country's minister to respect the rights of the United States and avoid violating its sovereignty, the President was anxiously concerned not to damage the harmony he wanted to sustain between the two republics. This concern held him back from taking action regarding Mr. Genet, despite the gentleman's conduct demanding it. He had witnessed a foreign minister overstep his authority within U.S. territory by claiming some of the most significant rights of sovereignty and continuing to exercise those rights even after the government prohibited it. This outrageous claim, which was completely at odds with national independence, was made with an attitude of arrogance rather than the respectful language typical of diplomacy. He had seen the same minister try to dictate civil government and declare, against the executive's decisions, how certain major national powers were allocated by the U.S. Constitution. To make matters even more critical and awkward, the individual primarily responsible for this situation had, since his arrival, thrown himself into the welcoming arms of the public, who were eager to support him, and felt emboldened by their favor to hope for success in either overthrowing their government or bending it to his will. But a full experiment had now been conducted, leading to an undeniable realization that moderation would only invite further injuries, and that the intolerable situation could only be resolved by removing the French minister or by becoming a submissive tool of hostility against his nation’s enemies. Reports were continuously coming in from all sides about new violations of the principles established by the government; while the executive was being openly disrespected and scorned, members of the administration were criticized in all the publications of an active and restless opposition as betrayers of national faith, supporters of monarchy, and enemies of liberty and France.

The unwearied efforts of that department to preserve that station in which the various treaties in existence had placed the nation, were incessantly calumniated[8] as infractions of those treaties, and ungrateful attempts to force the United States into the war against France.

The tireless efforts of that department to maintain the position the various treaties had assigned to the nation were constantly slandered[8] as violations of those treaties and ungrateful attempts to drag the United States into war against France.

The judgment of the President was never hastily formed; but, once made up, it was seldom to be shaken. Before the last letter of Mr. Genet was communicated to him, he seems to have determined to take decisive measures respecting that minister.

The President never made decisions quickly; however, once he had made up his mind, it was rarely changed. Before he received the final letter from Mr. Genet, he appeared to have decided to take strong actions regarding that minister.

Rules laid down by the executive in relation to the powers at war within the ports of the United States.
The president requests the recall of Genet.

That the course to be pursued might be well considered, the secretary of state was requested to collect all the correspondence with him, to be laid before a cabinet council about to be held for the purpose of adjusting a complete system of rules to be observed by the belligerents in the ports of the United States. These rules were discussed at several meetings, and finally, on the third of August, received the unanimous approbation of the cabinet. They[9] evidence the settled purpose of the executive, faithfully to observe all the national engagements, and honestly to perform the duties of that neutrality in which the war found them, and in which those engagements left them free to remain.

That the approach to be taken could be carefully considered, the secretary of state was asked to gather all correspondence related to him, to be presented at a cabinet meeting that was about to happen to establish a comprehensive set of rules for the belligerents in the ports of the United States. These rules were debated in several meetings and ultimately, on August third, were unanimously approved by the cabinet. They[9] show the clear intention of the executive to faithfully uphold all national commitments and dutifully maintain the neutrality in which they found themselves during the war, and which those commitments allowed them to remain.

In the case of the minister of the French republic, it was unanimously agreed that a letter should be written to Mr. Morris, the minister of the United States at Paris, stating the conduct of Mr. Genet, resuming the points of difference which had arisen between the government and that gentleman, assigning the reasons for the opinion of the former, desiring the recall of the latter, and directing that this letter, with those which had passed between Mr. Genet and the secretary of state, should be laid before the executive of the French government.

In the case of the minister of the French republic, it was unanimously agreed that a letter should be sent to Mr. Morris, the minister of the United States in Paris, outlining Mr. Genet's behavior, summarizing the differences that had arisen between the government and him, explaining the reasons behind the government’s opinion, requesting his recall, and instructing that this letter, along with the correspondence between Mr. Genet and the secretary of state, should be presented to the executive of the French government.

To a full view of the transactions of the executive with Mr. Genet, and an ample justification of its measures, this able diplomatic performance adds assurances of unvarying attachment to France, expressed in such terms of unaffected sensibility, as to render it impossible to suspect the sincerity of the concluding sentiment—"that, after independence and self-government, there was nothing America more sincerely wished than perpetual friendship with them."

To fully understand the executive's dealings with Mr. Genet and to provide a solid justification for its actions, this impressive diplomatic effort adds reassurances of unwavering loyalty to France, expressed in genuine and heartfelt terms, making it impossible to doubt the sincerity of the final sentiment—"that, after independence and self-government, there was nothing America wanted more sincerely than lasting friendship with them."

An adequate idea of the passion it excited in Mr. Genet, who received the communication in September, at New York, can be produced only by a perusal of his letter addressed, on that occasion, to the secretary of state. The asperity of his language was not confined to the President, whom he still set at defiance, whom he charged with transcending the limits prescribed by the constitution, and of whose accusation before congress he spoke as an act of justice "which the American people, which the French people, which all free people were interested to reclaim:" nor to those "gentlemen who had been painted to him so often as aristocrats, partisans of monarchy, partisans of England, and consequently enemies of the principles which all good Frenchmen had embraced with a religious enthusiasm." Its bitterness was also extended to the secretary of state himself, whom he had been induced to consider as his personal friend, and who had, he said, "initiated him into mysteries which had inflamed his hatred against all those who aspire to an absolute power."

An adequate understanding of the passion it stirred in Mr. Genet, who received the news in September in New York, can only be gained by reading his letter addressed to the secretary of state at that time. The sharpness of his language wasn’t just aimed at the President, whom he openly defied, accusing him of overstepping the limits set by the constitution, and spoke of his accusation before Congress as an act of justice "which the American people, the French people, and all free people were eager to reclaim." It wasn’t limited to those "gentlemen" he had frequently described as aristocrats, supporters of monarchy, supporters of England, and therefore enemies of the principles that all good French citizens had embraced with fervent enthusiasm. His bitterness was also directed toward the secretary of state himself, whom he had come to see as a personal friend, and who had, he claimed, "introduced him to secrets that intensified his hatred against all those who seek absolute power."

During these deliberations, Mr. Genet was received in New York with the same remarks of partiality to his nation, and of flattering regard to himself, which had been exhibited in the more southern states. At this place too, he manifested the same desire to encourage discontent at the conduct of the government, and to embark America in the quarrel, by impressing an opinion that the existence of liberty depended on the success of the French republic, which he had uniformly avowed. In answer to an address from the republican citizens of New York, who had spoken of the proclamation of neutrality as relating only to acts of open hostility, not to the feelings of the heart; and who had declared that they would "exultingly sacrifice a liberal portion of their dearest interests could there result, on behalf of the French republic, an adequate advantage;" he said—"in this respect I can not but interpret as you have done the declaration of your government. They must know that the strict performance of treaties is the best and safest policy; they must know that good faith alone can inspire respectability to a nation; that a pusillanimous conduct provokes insult, and brings upon a country those very dangers which it weakly means to avert.

During these discussions, Mr. Genet was welcomed in New York with the same bias towards his country and flattering regard for himself that had been shown in the more southern states. Here, he also expressed the same desire to stir up discontent with the government's actions and to get America involved in the conflict, suggesting that the survival of liberty depended on the success of the French republic, which he had consistently claimed. In response to a message from the republican citizens of New York, who stated that the proclamation of neutrality applied only to acts of open hostility and not to their feelings, and who declared they would "enthusiastically sacrifice a significant part of their most cherished interests if it benefited the French republic," he said—"in this regard, I can only see your government’s declaration as you do. They must understand that strictly honoring treaties is the best and safest policy; they must know that good faith is what earns a nation respect; that cowardly behavior invites insult and creates the very dangers a country seeks to avoid."

"There is indeed too much reason to fear that you are involved in the general conspiracy of tyrants against liberty. They never will, they never can forgive you for having been the first to proclaim the rights of man. But you will force them to respect you by pursuing with firmness the only path which is consistent with your national honour and dignity.

"There is definitely plenty of reason to worry that you are caught up in the overall plot of tyrants against freedom. They will never forgive you for being the first to announce the rights of man. But you will make them respect you by confidently following the only path that aligns with your national honor and dignity."

"The cause of France is the cause of all mankind, and no nation is more deeply interested than you are in its success. Whatever fate awaits her, you are ultimately to share. But the cause of liberty is great and it shall prevail.

"The cause of France is the cause of all humanity, and no nation is more invested in its success than you are. Whatever happens to her, you will ultimately share in it. But the cause of freedom is powerful, and it will prevail."

"And if France, under a despotic yoke, has been able so successfully to assert your rights, they can never again be endangered while she is at liberty to exert, in your support, that powerful arm which now defies the combined efforts of a whole world."

"And if France, under a harsh rule, has been able to successfully defend your rights, they can never be threatened again while she is free to use that strong influence which now stands against the combined efforts of the entire world."

While these exertions were successfully making to give increased force, and a wider extent, to opinions which might subvert the system adopted by the executive, Mr. Jay, the chief justice of the United States, and Mr. King, a senator representing the state, arrived in New York from Philadelphia. They had been preceded by a report, which was whispered in private circles, that the French minister had avowed a determination to appeal from the President to the people. The confidential intercourse subsisting between these gentlemen and a part of the administration rendering it probable that this declaration, if made, had been communicated to them, they were asked, whether the report was true; having received the information through a channel[10] which was entitled to the most implicit faith, they answered that it was.

While these efforts were successfully trying to strengthen and expand opinions that might undermine the system adopted by the executive, Mr. Jay, the chief justice of the United States, and Mr. King, a senator from the state, arrived in New York from Philadelphia. They had been preceded by a report, whispered in private circles, that the French minister had declared a determination to appeal from the President to the people. The close relationship between these gentlemen and part of the administration made it likely that this statement, if true, had been communicated to them. They were asked whether the report was accurate; having received the information through a reliable source, they confirmed that it was.

Their having said so was controverted; and they were repeatedly required, in the public papers, to admit or deny that they had made such an assertion. Thus called upon, they published a certificate avowing that they had made the declaration imputed to them.

Their statement was challenged; and they were repeatedly asked in the newspapers to admit or deny that they had made such a claim. In response, they published a certificate confirming that they had indeed made the declaration attributed to them.

On reflecting men this communication made a serious impression. The recent events in Poland, whose dismemberment and partition were easily traced to the admission of foreign influence, gave additional solemnity to the occurrence, and led to a more intent consideration of the awful causes which would embolden a foreign minister to utter such a threat.

On reflection, this communication had a serious impact on people. The recent events in Poland, whose dismemberment and division could easily be linked to foreign influence, lent a greater gravity to the situation and prompted a deeper consideration of the terrible reasons that would make a foreign minister feel bold enough to make such a threat.

That party, which in the commencement of the contests respecting the constitution was denominated federal, had generally supported the measures of the administration.

That party, which at the beginning of the debates about the constitution was called federal, generally supported the administration's measures.

That which was denominated anti-federal, had generally opposed those measures. South of the Potomac especially, there was certainly many important exceptions to this arrangement of parties; yet as a general arrangement, it was unquestionably correct.

That which was called anti-federal generally opposed those measures. Especially south of the Potomac, there were certainly many important exceptions to this party arrangement; yet as a general framework, it was undeniably accurate.

In the common partialities for France, in the common hope that the revolution in that country would be crowned with success, and would produce important benefits to the human race, they had equally participated; but in the course to be pursued by the United States, the line of separation between the two parties was clear and distinct. The federalists were universally of opinion that, in the existing war, America ought to preserve a neutrality as impartial as was compatible with her treaties; and that those treaties had been fairly and justly construed by the executive. Seduced however by their wishes, and by their affections, they at first yielded implicit faith to the assurances given by Mr. Genet of the disinclination of the French republic to draw them from this eligible position; and from this belief, they receded slowly and reluctantly.

In the widespread favoritism for France and the shared hope that the revolution there would succeed and bring significant benefits to humanity, both sides were equally involved. However, the path that the United States should take was clearly defined between the two factions. The Federalists universally believed that, in the current war, America should maintain a neutrality as unbiased as possible while still honoring its treaties; and that those treaties had been interpreted fairly and justly by the government. However, swayed by their desires and emotions, they initially placed complete trust in Mr. Genet's assurances that the French Republic did not intend to pull them away from this advantageous position; and based on this belief, they gradually and hesitantly pulled back.

They were inclined to ascribe the bitter invectives which were pronounced against the executive to an inveterate hostility to the government, and to those who administered it; and, when at length they were compelled to perceive that the whole influence of Mr. Genet was employed in stimulating and pointing these invectives, they fondly indulged the hope that his nation would not countenance his conduct. Adding to their undiminished attachment to the chief magistrate, a keen sense of the disgrace, the humiliation, and the danger of permitting the American government to be forced into any system of measures by the machinations of a foreign minister with the people, they had occasionally endeavoured, through the medium of the press, to keep the public mind correct; and, when it was announced that an appeal to themselves was threatened, they felt impelled by the strongest sentiments of patriotism and regard for national honour, to declare the indignation which the threat had inspired. In every quarter of the union, the people assembled in their districts, and the strength of parties was fully tried. The contest was warm and strenuous. But public opinion appeared to preponderate greatly in favour of neutrality, and of the proclamation by which its observance was directed. It was apparent too, that the American bosom still glowed with ardent affection for their chief magistrate; and that, however successful might have been the shafts directed against some of those who shared his confidence, the arrows aimed at himself had missed their mark.

They tended to attribute the harsh criticisms directed at the government to a deep-seated animosity toward it and those who ran it. When they finally recognized that Mr. Genet was using his influence to fuel and focus these criticisms, they held onto the hope that his country wouldn’t support his actions. With their unwavering loyalty to the president, they also felt a strong sense of shame, humiliation, and the risk involved in allowing the American government to be pushed into a set of actions by a foreign minister’s schemes against the people. They occasionally tried, through the media, to keep public opinion on the right track. When it was announced that an appeal to the people was threatened, they felt compelled by deep feelings of patriotism and respect for national honor to express the anger that the threat inspired. All across the nation, people gathered in their local areas, and the strength of political factions was thoroughly tested. The debate was intense and vigorous. However, public opinion strongly favored neutrality and the proclamation that mandated it. It was also clear that the American spirit still burned with deep love for their president; and that, despite the success of some attacks on those close to him, the criticisms aimed directly at him had failed.

Yet it was not to be concealed that the indiscreet arrogance of Mr. Genet, the direct insults to the President, and the attachment which many, who were in opposition to the general measures of the administration, still retained for the person of that approved patriot, contributed essentially to the prevalence of the sentiment which was called forth by the occasion.

Yet it couldn't be hidden that Mr. Genet's reckless arrogance, the direct insults to the President, and the loyalty many had for that respected patriot, despite opposing the general policies of the administration, played a significant role in shaping the sentiment that arose during that time.

In the resolutions expressing the strongest approbation of the measures which had been adopted, and the greatest abhorrence of foreign influence, a decided partiality for France was frequently manifested; while in those of a contrary description, respect for the past services of the President, and a willingness to support the executive in the exercises of its constitutional functions, seemed, when introduced, to be reluctantly placed among the more agreeable declarations of detestation for those who sought to dissolve the union between America and France, and of the devotion with which the French revolution ought to be espoused by all the friends of liberty.

In the resolutions showing strong approval of the measures taken and the greatest dislike for foreign influence, there was often a clear preference for France. Meanwhile, in the opposing resolutions, respect for the President's past services and a willingness to support the executive in carrying out its constitutional duties seemed to be reluctantly included alongside the more popular declarations of hatred toward those trying to break the bond between America and France, and the commitment with which the French revolution should be supported by all who value freedom.

The effect which the certificate of Mr. Jay and Mr. King might possibly produce was foreseen; and Mr. Genet sought to avoid its influence by questioning its veracity. Not only had it never been alleged that the exceptionable expressions were used to the President personally, but it was certain that they had not been uttered in his presence. Affecting not to have adverted to this obvious circumstance, the minister, on the 13th of August, addressed a letter to the chief magistrate, which, being designed for publication, was itself the act he had threatened, in which he subjoined to a detail of his accusations against the executive, the demand of an explicit declaration that he had never intimated to him an intention to appeal to the people.

The potential impact of Mr. Jay and Mr. King's certificate was anticipated, and Mr. Genet tried to counteract its influence by questioning its truthfulness. It was not only never claimed that the objectionable remarks were made directly to the President, but it was also certain that they weren't said in his presence. Ignoring this clear fact, the minister addressed a letter to the chief magistrate on August 13th, which was intended for publication, thus carrying out the action he had warned about. In this letter, he added a summary of his accusations against the executive, along with a demand for a clear statement that he had never suggested to him that he planned to appeal to the public.

On the 16th this letter was answered by the secretary of state, who, after acknowledging its receipt by the President, added, "I am desired to observe to you that it is not the established course for the diplomatic characters residing here to have any direct correspondence with him. The secretary of state is the organ through which their communications should pass.

On the 16th, the secretary of state replied to this letter, noting that the President had received it. The secretary added, "I must point out that it’s not standard practice for the diplomats living here to have any direct correspondence with him. The secretary of state is the channel through which their messages should go."

"The President does not conceive it to be within the line of propriety or duty, for him to bear evidence against a declaration, which, whether made to him or others, is perhaps immaterial; he therefore declines interfering in the case."

"The President doesn't think it's proper or his responsibility to give evidence against a statement that, whether made to him or someone else, is probably irrelevant; so he chooses not to get involved in the situation."

Seldom has more conclusive testimony been offered of the ascendency which, in the conflicts of party, the passions maintain over reason, than was exhibited, on this occasion, by the zealous partisans of the French minister. It might have been expected that, content with questioning the fact, or with diverting the obloquy attending it from the French nation, no American would have been found hardy enough to justify it; and but few, to condemn those gentlemen by whose means it had reached the public ear. Nothing could be farther removed from this expectation, than the conduct that was actually observed. The censure merited by the expressions themselves fell, not upon the person who had used them, but upon those who had communicated them to the public. Writers of considerable political eminence, charged them as being members of a powerful faction who were desirous of separating America from France, and connecting her with England, for the purpose of introducing the British constitution.

Seldom has more definitive proof been shown of how, in partisan conflicts, emotions can overpower reason than what was displayed at this time by the passionate supporters of the French minister. It might have been expected that, satisfied with questioning the fact or diverting the criticism aimed at it from the French nation, no American would be bold enough to justify it, and only a few would condemn those who had made it public. However, the actual behavior observed was far from this expectation. The criticism deserved by the remarks themselves fell, not on the person who made them, but on those who shared them with the public. Prominent political writers accused them of being part of a strong faction that wanted to separate America from France and align it with England in order to introduce the British constitution.

As if no sin could equal the crime of disclosing to the people a truth which, by inducing reflection, might check the flood of that passion for France which was deemed the surest test of patriotism, the darkest motives were assigned for the disclosure, and the reputation of those who made it has scarcely been rescued by a lapse of years, and by a change of the subjects of controversy, from the peculiar party odium with which they were at the time overwhelmed.

As if no wrongdoing could match the crime of revealing to the public a truth that, by encouraging thought, could dampen the intense passion for France that was seen as the ultimate proof of patriotism, the most negative reasons were given for the revelation. The reputation of those who shared it has hardly been saved by the passage of time and a shift in the topics of debate from the unique animosity of the party that they faced at that moment.

Sentiments of a still more extraordinary nature were openly avowed. In a republican country, it was said, the people alone were the basis of government. All powers being derived from them, might, by them, be withdrawn at pleasure. They alone were the authors of the law, and to them alone, must the ultimate decision on the interpretation belong. From these delicate and popular truths, it was inferred, that the doctrine that the sovereignty of the nation resided in the departments of government was incompatible with the principles of liberty; and that, if Mr. Genet dissented from the interpretation given by the President to existing treaties, he might rightfully appeal to the real sovereign whose agent the President was, and to whom he was responsible for his conduct. Is the President, it was asked, a consecrated character, that an appeal from his decisions must be considered criminal? or are the people in such a state of monarchical degradation, that to speak of consulting them is an offence as great, as if America groaned under a dominion equally tyrannical with the old monarchy of France?

Sentiments of an even more extraordinary nature were openly expressed. In a republic, it was said, the people were the foundation of the government. Since all powers came from them, they could withdraw those powers whenever they wanted. They were the only authors of the law, and the final judgment on its interpretation belonged solely to them. From these sensitive and widely accepted truths, it was concluded that the idea of national sovereignty residing in government departments was incompatible with the principles of liberty; and that if Mr. Genet disagreed with the President's interpretation of existing treaties, he could justifiably appeal to the true sovereign, of whom the President was an agent and to whom he was accountable for his actions. It was asked, is the President a consecrated figure that an appeal from his decisions must be viewed as criminal? Or are the people in such a state of monarchical degradation that to suggest consulting them is an offense as grave as if America were suffering under a tyranny as oppressive as the old monarchy of France?

It was soon ascertained that Mr. Dallas, to whom this threat of appealing to the people had been delivered, did not admit that the precise words had been used. Mr. Genet then, in the coarsest terms, averred the falsehood of the certificate which had been published, and demanded from the attorney general, and from the government, that Mr. Jay and Mr. King should be indicted for a libel upon himself and his nation. That officer accompanied his refusal to institute this information with the declaration that any other gentleman of the profession, who might approve and advise the attempt, could be at no loss to point out a mode which would not require his intervention.

It was soon established that Mr. Dallas, to whom this threat of appealing to the public had been made, did not agree that the exact words had been used. Mr. Genet then, in very blunt terms, asserted the falsity of the certificate that had been published, and demanded that the attorney general and the government indict Mr. Jay and Mr. King for libel against him and his nation. That official accompanied his refusal to pursue this action with the statement that any other lawyer who might approve and support the attempt could easily suggest a way that wouldn't require his involvement.

While the minister of the French republic thus loudly complained of the unparalleled injury he received from being charged with employing a particular exceptionable phrase, he seized every fair occasion to carry into full execution the threat which he denied having made. His letters, written for the purpose of publication, and actually published by himself, accused the executive, before the tribunal of the people, on those specific points, from its decisions respecting which he was said to have threatened the appeal. As if the offence lay, not in perpetrating the act, but in avowing an intention to perpetrate it, this demonstration of his designs did not render his advocates the less vehement in his support, nor the less acrimonious in reproaching the administration, as well as Mr. Jay and Mr. King.

While the French minister loudly complained about the serious harm he faced from being accused of using a certain objectionable phrase, he took every opportunity to carry out the threat he denied making. His letters, which he intended for publication and actually published himself, criticized the executive in front of the public on those specific points, from which he was said to have threatened to appeal. As if the wrongdoing lay not in committing the act, but in admitting an intention to do so, this display of his plans did not make his supporters any less passionate in backing him or any less harsh in criticizing the administration, as well as Mr. Jay and Mr. King.

Whilst insult was thus added to insult, the utmost vigilance of the executive officers was scarcely sufficient to maintain an observance of the rules which had been established for preserving neutrality in the American ports. Mr. Genet persisted in refusing to acquiesce in those rules; and fresh instances of attempts to violate them were continually recurring. Among these, was an outrage committed in Boston, too flagrant to be overlooked.

While insult was added to insult, the best efforts of the executive officers barely managed to uphold the rules set for maintaining neutrality in American ports. Mr. Genet continued to refuse to comply with those rules, and new attempts to break them constantly emerged. One of these was an outrageous act committed in Boston that was too blatant to ignore.

A schooner, brought as a prize into the port of Boston by a French privateer, was claimed by the British owner; who instituted proceedings at law against her, for the purpose of obtaining a decision on the validity of her capture. She was rescued from the possession of the marshal, by an armed force acting under the authority of Mr. Duplaine, the French consul, which was detached from a frigate then lying in port. Until the frigate sailed, she was guarded by a part of the crew; and, notwithstanding the determination of the American government that the consular courts should not exercise a prize jurisdiction within the territories of the United States, Mr. Duplaine declared his purpose to take cognizance of the case.

A schooner, captured as a prize and brought into Boston by a French privateer, was claimed by her British owner, who started legal proceedings to determine whether her capture was valid. She was rescued from the marshal's control by an armed group acting under Mr. Duplaine, the French consul, which was sent from a frigate that was in port at the time. Until the frigate set sail, part of her crew guarded the schooner; and despite the American government's ruling that consular courts couldn't handle prize cases within U.S. territory, Mr. Duplaine announced his intention to take charge of the matter.

To this act of open defiance, it was impossible for the President to submit. The facts being well attested, the exequatur which had been granted to Mr. Duplaine was revoked, and he was forbidden further to exercise the consular functions. It will excite surprise that even this necessary measure could not escape censure. The self-proclaimed champions of liberty discovered in it a violation of the constitution, and a new indignity to France.

To this act of open defiance, the President couldn't submit. The facts being well established, the approval that had been given to Mr. Duplaine was revoked, and he was prohibited from carrying out any more consular duties. It’s surprising that even this necessary action couldn't avoid criticism. The self-proclaimed defenders of freedom saw it as a violation of the constitution and a fresh insult to France.

Mr. Genet did not confine his attempts to employ the force of America against the enemies of his country to maritime enterprises. On his first arrival, he is understood to have planned an expedition against the Floridas, to be carried on from Georgia; and another against Louisiana, to be carried on from the western parts of the United States. Intelligence was received that the principal officers were engaged; and the temper of the people inhabiting the western country was such as to furnish some ground for the apprehension, that the restraints which the executive was capable of imposing, would be found too feeble to prevent the execution of this plan. The remonstrances of the Spanish commissioners on this subject, however, were answered with explicit assurances that the government would effectually interpose to defeat any expedition from the territories of the United States against those of Spain; and the governor of Kentucky was requested to co-operate in frustrating this improper application of the military resources of his state.

Mr. Genet didn't limit his efforts to use America's power against his country's enemies to just maritime actions. Upon his arrival, he is believed to have planned an expedition against Florida, to be launched from Georgia, and another against Louisiana, to be launched from the western parts of the United States. Reports came in that key officials were involved, and the attitudes of people living in the western region raised concerns that the limitations the government could impose might not be strong enough to stop this plan from happening. However, the Spanish commissioners' objections were met with clear assurances that the government would take effective measures to prevent any expedition from the United States targeting Spanish territories, and the governor of Kentucky was asked to work together to thwart this improper use of his state's military resources.

It was not by the machinations of the French minister alone that the neutrality of the United States was endangered. The party which, under different pretexts, urged measures the inevitable tendency of which was war, derived considerable aid, in their exertions to influence the passions of the people, from the conduct of others of the belligerent powers. The course pursued both by Britain and Spain rendered the task of the executive still more arduous, by furnishing weapons to the enemies of neutrality, capable of being wielded with great effect.

It wasn't just the French minister's schemes that put the United States' neutrality at risk. The group that, under various pretenses, pushed for actions that would inevitably lead to war was significantly helped in their efforts to sway public opinion by the actions of other warring nations. The approach taken by both Britain and Spain made it even harder for the government, as they provided ammunition to those against neutrality, which could be used very effectively.

The resentment excited by the rigour with which the maritime powers of Europe retained the monopoly of their colonial commerce, had, without the aid of those powerful causes which had lately been brought into operation, been directed peculiarly against Great Britain. These resentments had been greatly increased. That nation had not mitigated the vexations and inconveniences which war necessarily inflicts on neutral trade, by any relaxations in her colonial policy.

The resentment stirred up by the strict control that European maritime powers kept over their colonial trade was, without the recent powerful influences at play, particularly aimed at Great Britain. These resentments had intensified. That country had not eased the frustrations and difficulties that war inevitably brings to neutral trade by making any changes to its colonial policies.

Decree of the national convention relative to neutral commerce.

To this rigid and repulsive system, that of France presented a perfect contrast. Either influenced by the politics of the moment, or suspecting that, in a contest with the great maritime nations of Europe, her commerce must search for security in other bottoms than her own, she opened the ports of her colonies to every neutral flag, and offered to the United States a new treaty, in which it was understood that every mercantile distinction between Americans and Frenchmen should be totally abolished.

To this strict and unappealing system, France presented a complete contrast. Either influenced by the politics of the time, or realizing that, in competition with the major maritime nations of Europe, her trade needed to find safety on ships other than her own, she opened the ports of her colonies to every neutral flag and proposed a new treaty to the United States, which included the understanding that all trade distinctions between Americans and French would be completely eliminated.

With that hasty credulity which, obedient to the wishes, can not await the sober and deliberate decisions of the judgment, the Americans ascribed this change, and these propositions, to the liberal genius of freedom; and expected the new commercial and political systems to be equally durable. As if, in the term republic, the avaricious spirit of commercial monopoly would lose its influence over men; as if the passions were to withdraw from the management of human affairs, and leave the helm to the guidance of reason, and of disinterested philanthropy; a vast proportion of the American people believed this novel system to be the genuine offspring of new-born liberty; and consequently expected that, from the success of the republican arms, a flood of untried good was to rush upon the world.

With that quick belief which, eager to please, can't wait for the thoughtful and careful decisions of reason, the Americans attributed this change and these proposals to the progressive spirit of freedom; and they expected the new commercial and political systems to be just as long-lasting. As if, in the word republic, the greedy nature of commercial monopoly would lose its hold on people; as if the emotions would step back from managing human affairs, allowing reason and selfless kindness to take over; a large portion of the American population thought this new system was the true product of newfound liberty; and thus expected that, following the success of the republican forces, a wave of unprecedented good would flood the world.

The avidity with which the neutral merchants pressed forward to reap the rich and tempting harvest offered to them by the regulations and the wants of France, presented a harvest not less rich and tempting to the cruisers of her enemies. Captures to a great extent were made, some with, others without, justifiable cause; and the irritations inseparable from disappointment in gathering the fruits of a gainful traffic, were extensively communicated to the agricultural part of society.

The eagerness of the neutral merchants to take advantage of the lucrative opportunities provided by the regulations and needs of France also attracted the attention of her enemies' cruisers. Many captures occurred, some justified and others not; the frustrations that came from not being able to benefit from this profitable trade were widely felt in the farming community.

The vexations on the ocean to which neutrals are commonly exposed during war, were aggravated by a measure of the British cabinet, which war was not admitted to justify.

The frustrations that neutral parties often face on the ocean during a war were made worse by a decision from the British government, which the war did not justify.

British order of 1793.

The vast military exertions of the French republic had carried many hands from their usual occupations, to the field; and the measures of government, added to the internal commotions, had discouraged labour by rendering its profits insecure. These causes, aided perhaps by unfavourable seasons, had produced a scarcity which threatened famine. This state of things suggested to their enemies the policy of increasing the internal distress, by cutting off the external supply. In execution of this plan, the British cruisers were instructed "to stop all vessels loaded wholly or in part with corn, flour, or meal, bound to any port in France, or any port occupied by the armies of France, and to send them to such ports as shall be most convenient, in order that such corn, meal, or flour, may be purchased on behalf of his majesty's government, and the ships be relieved after such purchase, and after a due allowance for freight; or that the masters of such ships on giving due security, to be approved by the court of admiralty, be permitted to proceed to dispose of their cargoes of corn, meal, or flour, in the ports of any country in amity with his majesty."

The extensive military efforts of the French republic had taken many people away from their regular jobs and into the battlefield; the government’s actions, combined with internal unrest, had made work less appealing by making its rewards uncertain. These factors, possibly worsened by bad weather, had led to a shortage that threatened starvation. This situation led their enemies to adopt a strategy of worsening the internal crisis by cutting off outside supplies. To implement this plan, British warships were ordered "to stop all vessels loaded completely or partially with corn, flour, or meal, headed to any port in France, or any port occupied by French forces, and to redirect them to the most convenient ports, so that such corn, meal, or flour can be purchased on behalf of his majesty's government, and the ships can be released after the purchase and a proper allowance for freight; or that the captains of those ships, by providing proper security approved by the court of admiralty, be allowed to proceed to sell their cargoes of corn, meal, or flour in the ports of any country friendly to his majesty."

In the particular character of the war, and in the general expressions of some approved modern writers on the law of nations, the British government sought a justification of this strong measure. But by neutrals generally, it was deemed an unwarrantable invasion of their rights; and the remonstrances made against it by the American government in particular, were serious and earnest. This attempt to make a principle, which was understood to be applicable only to blockaded places, subservient to the impracticable plan of starving an immense agricultural nation, was resisted with great strength of reasoning by the administration; and added, not inconsiderably, to the resentment felt by the body of the people.[11]

In the specific nature of the war, and in the general views of some well-regarded modern writers on international law, the British government sought to justify this strong action. However, neutrals in general regarded it as an unjustifiable violation of their rights; the protests made by the American government, in particular, were serious and sincere. This effort to apply a principle that was understood to apply only to blockaded areas to the unfeasible plan of starving a large agricultural nation was met with significant logical opposition by the administration, and it also contributed to the anger felt by the general public.[11]

Hostilities on the ocean disclosed still another source of irritation, which added its copious stream to the impetuous torrent which threatened to sweep America into the war that desolated Europe.

Hostilities at sea revealed yet another source of frustration, contributing a steady flow to the rushing tide that threatened to pull America into the war that devastated Europe.

The British government had long been accustomed to resort to the practice of manning their fleet by impressment. The exercise of this prerogative had not been confined to the land. Merchantmen in their ports, and even at sea, were visited, and mariners were taken out of them, to be employed in the royal navy. The profits of trade enabling neutral merchants to give high wages, British sailors were tempted, in great numbers, to enter their service; but the neutral ship furnished no protection. Disregarding the bottom in which they sailed, the officers of the navy impressed them wherever found, often leaving scarcely hands enough to navigate the vessel into port.

The British government had long been used to staffing their fleet through press-ganging. This practice wasn't limited to the shore. Merchant ships in their ports and even at sea were approached, and sailors were taken from them to serve in the royal navy. The profits from trade allowed neutral merchants to pay high wages, which attracted many British sailors to join their ranks; however, the neutral ship offered no protection. Ignoring the nationality of the vessels, navy officers impressed sailors wherever they found them, often leaving barely enough crew to steer the ship back to port.

The Americans were peculiarly exposed to the abuse to which such usages are liable. Descended from the same ancestors and speaking the same language, the distinction between them and the English, though in general sufficiently marked, was not always so visible as to prevent unintentional error; nor were the captains of ships of war, at all times, very solicitous to avoid mistake. Native Americans, therefore, were frequently impressed, and compelled to serve against the French republic.

The Americans were particularly vulnerable to the mistreatment that often comes with such practices. Sharing the same ancestry and language, the differences between them and the English, while generally clear, weren't always obvious enough to avoid accidental mistakes; nor were the captains of warships always very careful to prevent errors. As a result, Native Americans were often forced into service and made to fight against the French republic.

The British cabinet disclaimed all pretensions to the impressment of real American citizens, and declared officially a willingness to discharge them, on the establishment of their citizenship. But time was necessary to procure the requisite testimonials; and those officers who had notoriously offended in this respect, were not so discountenanced by their government as to be deterred from a repetition of the offence. There was too, one class of citizens, concerning whose rights a difference of opinion prevailed, which has not even yet been adjusted. These were British subjects who had migrated to, and been adopted by, the United States.

The British cabinet denied any claims to the forced recruitment of actual American citizens and officially stated their willingness to release them once their citizenship was confirmed. However, it took time to gather the necessary proof. Those officers who had clearly wronged in this matter were not discouraged by their government from repeating the offense. Additionally, there was a group of citizens whose rights were subject to differing opinions, a dispute that still hasn't been resolved. These were British subjects who had moved to and been accepted by the United States.

The continuance of the Indian war added still another item to this catalogue of discontents.

The ongoing Indian war added yet another item to this list of grievances.

The efforts of the United States to make a treaty with the savages of the Miamis had proved abortive. The Indians insisted on the Ohio as the boundary between them and the whites; and, although the American commissioners expressed a willingness to relinquish some of the lands purchased at the treaty of fort Harmar, and pressed them to propose some line between the boundary established by that treaty and the Ohio, they adhered inflexibly to their original demand.

The United States' attempts to reach a treaty with the Miamis had failed. The Native Americans insisted that the Ohio River be the boundary between them and the settlers. Even though the American commissioners were open to giving up some of the land acquired in the Treaty of Fort Harmar and urged the Miamis to suggest a boundary line between the one established by that treaty and the Ohio, the Miamis remained firm in their original demand.

It was extensively believed in America, and information collected from the Indians countenanced the opinion, that they were encouraged by the government of Canada to persevere in this claim, and that the treaty was defeated by British influence. The conviction was universal that this influence would continue so long as the posts south of the lakes should be occupied by British troops; and the uneasiness which the detention of those posts created, daily acquired strength. Unfortunately, the original pretext for detaining them was not yet removed. The courts of the United States had not yet declared that British debts contracted before the war, were recoverable. In one of the circuits, a decision had been recently made, partly favourable, and partly unfavourable, to the claim of the creditor. To this decision writs of error had been brought, and the case was pending before the supreme court. The motives therefore originally assigned for holding the posts on the lakes still remained; and, as it was a maxim with the executive "to place an adversary clearly in the wrong," and it was expected that the existing impediments to the fulfilment of the treaty on the part of the United States would soon be done away, it was thought unadviseable, had the military force of the union been equal to the object, to seize those posts, until their surrender could be required in consequence of a complete execution of the treaty. In the mean time, the British minister was earnestly pressed upon the subject.

It was widely believed in America, and information gathered from the Indians supported this view, that the Canadian government was encouraging them to maintain their claims, and that British influence was sabotaging the treaty. There was a strong belief that this influence would persist as long as British troops occupied the posts south of the lakes, and the anxiety caused by the delay in relinquishing those posts grew stronger every day. Unfortunately, the initial reason for holding them had not been resolved. The courts of the United States had not yet ruled that British debts incurred before the war could be collected. In one of the circuits, a recent ruling was made that was partially favorable and partially unfavorable to the creditor's claim. Appeals were filed against this ruling, and the case was still pending before the Supreme Court. Therefore, the reasons originally given for keeping the posts on the lakes remained valid; and since it was a principle of the executive "to clearly place an adversary in the wrong," and it was anticipated that the current obstacles to fulfilling the treaty on the part of the United States would soon be addressed, it was deemed unwise, had the military power of the union been adequate for the task, to seize those posts until their surrender could be demanded as a result of fully executing the treaty. In the meantime, the British minister was being pressed seriously on the issue.

This prudent conduct was far from being satisfactory to the people. Estimating at nothing, infractions made by themselves, and rating highly those committed by the opposite party, they would, in any state of things, have complained loudly of this act of the British government. But, agitated as they were by the various causes which were perpetually acting on their passions, it is not wonderful that an increased influence was given to this measure; that it should be considered as conclusive testimony of British hostility, and should add to the bitterness with which the government was reproached for attempting a system "alike friendly and impartial to the belligerent powers."

This cautious behavior was far from satisfying the people. They downplayed any wrongs they committed while exaggerating those of the opposing party, so they would have complained loudly about this action from the British government under any circumstances. However, given their agitation from various factors constantly stirring their emotions, it's not surprising that this measure took on greater significance; it was seen as clear proof of British hostility and fueled the resentment directed at the government for trying to maintain a stance "equally friendly and impartial to the warring parties."

The causes of discontent which were furnished by Spain, though less the theme of public declamation, continued to be considerable.

The reasons for dissatisfaction provided by Spain, while not often discussed publicly, remained significant.

The American ministers at Madrid could make no progress in their negotiation. The question of limits remained unsettled, and the Mississippi was still closed against the Americans. In addition to these subjects of disquiet, the southern states were threatened with war from the Creeks and Cherokees, who were, with good reason, believed to be excited to hostility by the Spanish government. Of these irritating differences, that which related to the Mississippi was far the most operative, and embarrassing. The imagination, especially when warmed by discontent, bestows on a good which is withheld, advantages much greater than the reality will justify; and the people of the western country were easily persuaded to believe that the navigation of the Mississippi was a mine of wealth which would at once enrich them. That jealousy which men so readily entertain of the views of those with whom they do not associate, had favoured the efforts made by the enemies of the administration, to circulate the opinion that an opposition of interests existed between the eastern and the western people, and that the endeavours of the executive to open their great river were feeble and insincere. At a meeting of the Democratic Society in Lexington, in Kentucky, this sentiment was unanimously avowed in terms of peculiar disrespect to the government; and a committee was appointed to open a correspondence with the inhabitants of the whole western country, for the purpose of uniting them on this all important subject, and of preparing on it a remonstrance to the President and congress of the United States, to be expressed "in the bold, decent and determined language, proper to be used by injured freemen when they address the servants of the people." They claimed much merit for their moderation in having thus long, out of regard to their government, and affection for their fellow citizens on the Atlantic, abstained from the use of those means which they possessed for the assertion of what they termed a natural and unalienable right; and seemed to indicate the opinion that this forbearance could not be long continued. Without regarding the determination of Spain in the case or the poverty of the means placed in the hands of the executive for inducing a change in this determination, they demanded from the government the free use of the Mississippi, as if only an act of the will was necessary to insure it to them. Not even the probability that the public and intemperate expression of these dangerous dispositions would perpetuate the evil, could moderate them. This restless uneasy temper gave additional importance to the project of an expedition against Louisiana, which had been formed by Mr. Genet.

The American diplomats in Madrid were making no headway in their negotiations. The issue of boundaries was still unresolved, and the Mississippi River remained closed off to Americans. On top of these troubling matters, the southern states faced the threat of conflict with the Creeks and Cherokees, who were believed, with good reason, to be stirred up by the Spanish government. Among these frustrating issues, the situation regarding the Mississippi was by far the most significant and troublesome. People, especially when fueled by discontent, tend to imagine that the benefits of something being denied are much greater than they actually are. The residents of the western territories were easily convinced that being able to navigate the Mississippi would bring them immense wealth instantly. The natural jealousy people feel toward those they don't associate with helped the opponents of the administration spread the idea that there was a conflict of interests between eastern and western populations, and that the government's attempts to open the river were weak and insincere. During a meeting of the Democratic Society in Lexington, Kentucky, this sentiment was expressed unanimously with outright disrespect towards the government. A committee was set up to establish communication with people across the western territories, aiming to unite them on this crucial issue and prepare a formal complaint to the President and Congress of the United States, to be delivered "in the bold, decent, and determined language appropriate for injured freemen addressing their public servants." They took pride in their restraint, noting that they had held back from using their means to assert what they called a natural and unalienable right, out of respect for their government and fellow citizens on the Atlantic coast, but suggested that this patience couldn't last much longer. Ignoring Spain's position or the lack of resources available to the executive to effect any change, they demanded unrestricted access to the Mississippi, as if it were merely a matter of will to secure it. Even the possibility that public and reckless expression of these dangerous attitudes could worsen the situation did nothing to temper their resolve. This restless and uneasy spirit added urgency to an expedition against Louisiana, which had been planned by Mr. Genet.

These public causes for apprehending hostilities[12] with Spain, were strengthened by private communications. The government had received intelligence from their ministers in Europe that propositions had been made by the cabinet of Madrid to that of London, the object of which was the United States. The precise nature of these propositions was not ascertained, but it was understood generally, that their tendency was hostile.

These public reasons for fearing conflicts[12] with Spain were supported by private reports. The government had received information from their ministers in Europe that proposals had been made by the Madrid cabinet to the London one, aimed at the United States. The exact details of these proposals were not confirmed, but it was generally understood that they were hostile in nature.

Thus unfavourable to the pacific views of the executive were the circumstances under which congress was to assemble.

Thus, the circumstances under which Congress was set to meet were not conducive to the peaceful aims of the executive.


CHAPTER II.

Meeting of congress.... President's speech.... His message on the foreign relations of the United States.... Report of the Secretary of State on the commerce of the United States.... He resigns.... Is succeeded by Mr. Randolph.... Mr. Madison's resolutions founded on the above report.... Debate thereon.... Debates on the subject of a navy.... An embargo law.... Mission of Mr. Jay to Great Britain.... Inquiry into the conduct of the Secretary of the Treasury, terminates honourably to him.... Internal taxes.... Congress adjourns.

Congress meeting... President's speech... His message about the U.S. foreign relations... Report from the Secretary of State on U.S. commerce... He resigns... Mr. Randolph takes over... Mr. Madison's resolutions based on the report above... Debate on this... Discussions about a navy... An embargo law... Mr. Jay's mission to Great Britain... Investigation into the Secretary of the Treasury's actions ends favorably for him... Internal taxes... Congress adjourns.

 

1793
Meeting of Congress.

A malignant fever, believed to be infectious, had, through part of the summer and autumn, severely afflicted the city of Philadelphia, and dispersed the officers of the executive government. Although the fear of contagion was not entirely dispelled when the time for the meeting of congress arrived, yet, such was the active zeal of parties, and such the universal expectation that important executive communications would be made, and that legislative measures not less important would be founded on them, that both houses were full on the first day, and a joint committee waited on the President with the usual information that they were ready to receive his communications.

A risky fever, thought to be contagious, had seriously affected the city of Philadelphia during part of the summer and autumn, scattering the members of the executive government. Although the fear of infection wasn't completely gone by the time Congress was set to meet, the enthusiasm of the parties and the widespread anticipation that significant executive updates would be shared, along with equally important legislative actions, led to both houses being full on the first day. A joint committee then approached the President with the usual message that they were ready to hear his updates.

On the fourth of December, at twelve, the President met both houses in the senate chamber. His speech was moderate, firm, dignified, and interesting. It commenced with his own re-election, his feelings at which were thus expressed—

On December 4th, at noon, the President met with both houses in the senate chamber. His speech was measured, strong, dignified, and engaging. It began with his re-election, and he expressed his feelings about it—

President's speech.

"Since the commencement of the term for which I have been again called into office, no fit occasion has arisen for expressing to my fellow-citizens at large, the deep and respectful sense which I feel of the renewed testimony of public approbation. While on the one hand, it awakened my gratitude for all those instances of affectionate partiality with which I have been honoured by my country; on the other, it could not prevent an earnest wish for that retirement, from which no private consideration could ever have torn me. But, influenced by the belief that my conduct would be estimated according to its real motives, and that the people, and the authorities derived from them, would support exertions having nothing personal for their object, I have obeyed the suffrage which commanded me to resume the executive power; and I humbly implore that Being on whose will the fate of nations depends, to crown with success our mutual endeavours for the general happiness."

"Since I started this term after being called back into office, I haven't had the right chance to express to my fellow citizens how deeply I appreciate the renewed support from the public. On one hand, it makes me grateful for all the kindness I've received from my country; on the other hand, it doesn't take away my strong desire for a quiet life, which no personal reason could ever push me away from. But, believing that my actions would be judged based on their true intentions, and that the people and the authorities they choose would back efforts that are not for personal gain, I've followed the will of those who asked me to take on the executive role again. I humbly pray to the Being who determines the fate of nations to help us succeed in our shared efforts for everyone's happiness."

Passing to those measures which had been adopted by the executive for the regulation of its conduct towards the belligerent nations, he observed, "as soon as the war in Europe had embraced those powers with whom the United States have the most extensive relations, there was reason to apprehend that our intercourse with them might be interrupted, and our disposition for peace drawn into question by suspicions too often entertained by belligerent nations. It seemed therefore to be my duty to admonish our citizens of the consequence of a contraband trade, and of hostile acts to any of the parties; and to obtain, by a declaration of the existing state of things, an easier admission of our rights to the immunities belonging to our situation. Under these impressions the proclamation which will be laid before you was issued.

Moving on to the measures taken by the executive to manage its relations with the warring nations, he noted, "Once the conflict in Europe involved the countries with which the United States has the closest ties, it became clear that our interactions with them might be disrupted, and our commitment to peace could be questioned due to the suspicions often held by warring nations. Thus, I felt it was my responsibility to inform our citizens about the risks of engaging in illegal trade and taking hostile actions against any of the involved parties; and to clarify the current situation so we could better assert our rights to the privileges that come with our status. With these thoughts in mind, the proclamation that will be presented to you was issued."

"In this posture of affairs, both new and delicate, I resolved to adopt general rules which should conform to the treaties, and assert the privileges of the United States. These were reduced into a system, which shall be communicated to you."

"In this situation, both new and sensitive, I decided to establish general guidelines that would align with the treaties and uphold the rights of the United States. These guidelines have been organized into a system, which I will share with you."

After suggesting those legislative provisions on this subject, the necessity of which had been pointed out by experience, he proceeded to say,

After proposing those laws on this topic, which experience had highlighted as necessary, he went on to say,

"I can not recommend to your notice measures for the fulfilment of our duties to the rest of the world, without again pressing upon you the necessity of placing ourselves in a condition of complete defence, and of exacting from them the fulfilment of their duties towards us. The United States ought not to indulge a persuasion that, contrary to the order of human events, they will forever keep at a distance those painful appeals to arms with which the history of every nation abounds. There is a rank due to the United States among nations which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of weakness. If we desire to avoid insult, we must be able to repel it; if we desire to secure peace—one of the most powerful instruments of our prosperity—it must be known that we are, at all times, ready for war."

"I can’t recommend that you consider measures for fulfilling our responsibilities to the rest of the world without stressing again the need to ensure we are fully prepared for defense and to demand that they meet their responsibilities to us. The United States shouldn't hold the belief that, against the course of history, they will always be able to avoid the painful calls to arms that every nation faces. There is a standing that the United States deserves among nations, which will be compromised, if not completely lost, by the perception of weakness. If we want to prevent insults, we must be capable of pushing back; if we want to maintain peace—one of the strongest tools for our prosperity—it must be clear that we are always ready for war."

These observations were followed by a recommendation to augment the supply of arms and ammunition in the magazines, and to improve the militia establishment.

These observations were followed by a suggestion to increase the supply of weapons and ammunition in the storage facilities, and to enhance the militia structure.

After referring to a communication to be subsequently made for occurrences relative to the connexion of the United States with Europe, which had, he said, become extremely interesting; and after reviewing Indian affairs, he particularly addressed the house of representatives. Having presented to them in detail some subjects of which it was proper they should be informed, he added;—"no pecuniary consideration is more urgent than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt; on none can delay be more injurious, or an economy of time more valuable.

After mentioning a message that would soon be sent about the relationship between the United States and Europe, which he said had become very interesting, and after discussing issues related to Native Americans, he specifically addressed the House of Representatives. He presented them with detailed information on certain matters they needed to know and added, "Nothing is more pressing than the regular payment and settlement of the public debt; any delay would be more harmful, and saving time is more valuable."

"The productiveness of the public revenues hitherto has continued to be equal to the anticipations which were formed of it; but it is not expected to prove commensurate with all the objects which have been suggested. Some auxiliary provisions will therefore, it is presumed, be requisite; and it is hoped that these may be made consistently with a due regard to the convenience of our citizens, who can not but be sensible of the true wisdom of encountering a small present addition to their contributions, to obviate a future accumulation of burdens."

"The effectiveness of public revenue so far has matched expectations; however, it isn't likely to cover all the suggested goals. Therefore, it's assumed that some additional measures will be necessary, and it's hoped these can be implemented with consideration for the convenience of our citizens, who should recognize the wisdom of accepting a small current increase in their contributions to avoid a larger burden later on."

The speech was concluded with the following impressive exhortation:

The speech ended with this powerful encouragement:

"The several subjects to which I have now referred, open a wide range to your deliberations, and involve some of the choicest interests of our common country. Permit me to bring to your remembrance the magnitude of your task. Without an unprejudiced coolness, the welfare of the government may be hazarded; without harmony, as far as consists with freedom of sentiment, its dignity may be lost. But, as the legislative proceedings of the United States will never, I trust, be reproached for the want of temper, or of candour, so shall not the public happiness languish from the want of my strenuous and warmest co-operation."

"The various subjects I've mentioned now give you a lot to think about and involve some of the most important interests of our shared country. Let me remind you of the significance of your responsibilities. Without a neutral mindset, the well-being of the government could be at risk; without harmony, while allowing for freedom of expression, its dignity could be compromised. However, I hope that the legislative actions of the United States will never be criticized for lacking composure or honesty, and that public happiness will not suffer from my strong and enthusiastic support."

His message on the subject of the foreign relations of the United States.

The day succeeding that on which this speech was delivered, a special message was sent to both houses, containing some of the promised communications relative to the connexion of the United States with foreign powers.

The day after this speech was given, a special message was sent to both houses, including some of the promised updates about the relationship of the United States with foreign powers.

After suggesting as a motive for this communication that it not only disclosed "matter of interesting inquiry to the legislature," but, "might indeed give rise to deliberations to which they alone were competent;" the President added—"the representative and executive bodies of France have manifested generally a friendly attachment to this country; have given advantages to our commerce and navigation; and have made overtures for placing these advantages on permanent ground. A decree, however, of the national assembly, subjecting vessels laden with provisions to be carried into their ports, and making enemy goods lawful prize in the vessel of a friend, contrary to our treaty, though revoked at one time as to the United States, has been since extended to their vessels also, as has been recently stated to us. Representations on the subject will be immediately given in charge to our minister there, and the result shall be communicated to the legislature.

After suggesting that this communication serves not only to reveal "matters of interest to the legislature," but also "could indeed lead to discussions that only they are qualified to handle," the President added—"the representative and executive bodies of France have shown a generally friendly connection to this country; they have provided benefits to our trade and shipping; and they have proposed to establish these benefits on a permanent basis. However, a decree from the national assembly, which requires ships carrying provisions to bring them into their ports, and declares enemy goods to be lawful prize on the vessel of a friend, contrary to our treaty, though revoked at one point for the United States, has since been extended to their vessels as well, as we have recently been informed. Our minister there will be tasked with addressing this issue, and the outcome will be reported back to the legislature.

"It is with extreme concern I have to inform you that the person whom they have unfortunately appointed their minister plenipotentiary here, has breathed nothing of the friendly spirit of the nation which sent him. Their tendency on the contrary has been to involve us in a war abroad and discord and anarchy at home. So far as his acts, or those of his agents, have threatened an immediate commitment in the war, or flagrant insult to the authority of the laws, their effect has been counteracted by the ordinary cognizance of the laws, and by an exertion of the powers confided to me. Where their danger was not imminent, they have been borne with, from sentiments of regard to his nation, from a sense of their friendship towards us, from a conviction that they would not suffer us to remain long exposed to the actions of a person who has so little respected our mutual dispositions, and, I will add, from a reliance on the firmness of my fellow-citizens in their principles of peace and order. In the mean time I have respected and pursued the stipulations of our treaties, according to what I judged their true sense; and have withheld no act of friendship which their affairs have called for from us, and which justice to others left us free to perform. I have gone further. Rather than employ force for the restitution of certain vessels which I deemed the United States bound to restore, I thought it more adviseable to satisfy the parties by avowing it to be my opinion, that, if restitution were not made, it would be incumbent on the United States to make compensation."

"It is with great concern that I must inform you that the person they have unfortunately appointed as their minister plenipotentiary here, has shown none of the friendly spirit of the nation that sent him. Instead, their tendency has been to drag us into a war abroad and create discord and chaos at home. As far as his actions, or those of his agents, have threatened an immediate commitment to the war, or directly insulted the authority of our laws, their impact has been mitigated by the usual enforcement of the law and by an exercise of the powers entrusted to me. Where their danger was not immediate, we have tolerated them out of respect for his nation, acknowledging their friendship towards us, believing they would not let us remain exposed to the actions of someone who shows so little regard for our mutual intentions, and I will add, relying on the strength of my fellow citizens in their commitment to peace and order. In the meantime, I have respected and upheld the terms of our treaties, based on what I believed to be their true meaning; and I have not held back any acts of friendship that their situation has warranted from us, as long as justice to others allowed us to do so. I have even gone further. Rather than use force to return certain vessels that I believed the United States was obligated to restore, I thought it wiser to address the parties by stating my opinion that if restitution was not made, the United States would need to provide compensation."

The message next proceeded to state that inquiries had been instituted respecting the vexations and spoliations committed on the commerce of the United States, the result of which when received would be communicated.

The message then went on to say that investigations had been launched regarding the troubles and losses inflicted on U.S. commerce, and once the results were received, they would be shared.

The order issued by the British government on the 8th of June, and the measures taken by the executive of the United States in consequence thereof, were briefly noticed; and the discussions which had taken place in relation to the non-execution of the treaty of peace were also mentioned. The message was then concluded with a reference to the negotiations with Spain. "The public good," it was said, "requiring that the present state of these should be made known to the legislature in confidence only, they would be the subject of a separate and subsequent communication."

The order issued by the British government on June 8th and the actions taken by the U.S. executive as a result were briefly acknowledged, along with the discussions related to the failure to implement the peace treaty. The message concluded by referencing the negotiations with Spain. "The public good," it was stated, "requires that the current status of these negotiations be shared with the legislature confidentially only, so they will be addressed in a separate and later communication."

This message was accompanied with copies of the correspondence between the secretary of state and the French minister, on the points of difference which subsisted between the two governments, together with several documents necessary for the establishment of particular facts; and with the letter written by Mr. Jefferson to Mr. Morris, which justified the conduct of the United States by arguments too clear to be misunderstood, and too strong ever to be encountered.

This message included copies of the communication between the Secretary of State and the French minister regarding the differences between the two governments, along with several documents needed to establish specific facts; it also contained the letter Mr. Jefferson wrote to Mr. Morris, which defended the United States' actions with arguments that were too clear to misinterpret and too strong to be challenged.

The extensive discussions which had taken place relative to the non-execution of the treaty of peace, and the correspondence produced by the objectionable measures which had been adopted by the British government during the existing war, were also laid before the legislature.

The lengthy discussions that had happened regarding the failure to execute the peace treaty, along with the correspondence resulting from the controversial actions taken by the British government during the ongoing war, were also presented to the legislature.

In a popular government, the representatives of the people may generally be considered as a mirror, reflecting truly the passions and feelings which govern their constituents. In the late elections, the strength of parties had been tried; and the opposition had derived so much aid from associating the cause of France with its own principles, as to furnish much reason to suspect that, in one branch of the legislature at least, it had become the majority. The first act of the house of representatives served to strengthen this suspicion. By each party a candidate for the chair was brought forward; and Mr. Muhlenberg, who was supported by the opposition, was elected by a majority of ten votes, against Mr. Sedgewick, whom the federalists supported.

In a democratic government, the representatives of the people can generally be seen as a reflection of the emotions and sentiments that drive their constituents. In the recent elections, the strength of different parties was tested; the opposition gained considerable support by linking the cause of France to its own principles, raising strong suspicions that, at least in one branch of the legislature, it had become the majority. The first act of the House of Representatives reinforced this suspicion. Each party nominated a candidate for the chair, and Mr. Muhlenberg, backed by the opposition, was elected by a majority of ten votes over Mr. Sedgewick, who had the support of the federalists.

The answer, however, to the speech of the President, wore no tinge of that malignant and furious spirit which had infused itself into the publications of the day. Breathing the same affectionate attachment to his person and character which had been professed in other times, and being approved by every part of the house, it indicated that the leaders, at least, still venerated their chief magistrate, and that no general intention as yet existed, to involve him in the obloquy directed against his measures.

The response to the President's speech, however, lacked the negative and angry tone that had characterized the publications of the time. It conveyed the same warm affection for his person and character that had been expressed in the past, and it was supported by everyone in the house. This showed that the leaders still respected their chief magistrate and that there was no widespread intention to blame him for the criticism aimed at his policies.

Noticing that unanimous suffrage by which he had been again called to his present station, "it was," they said, "with equal sincerity and promptitude they embraced the occasion for expressing to him their congratulations on so distinguished a testimony of public approbation, and their entire confidence in the purity and patriotism of the motives which had produced this obedience to the voice of his country. It is," proceeded the address, "to virtues which have commanded long and universal reverence, and services from which have flowed great and lasting benefits that the tribute of praise may be paid without the reproach of flattery; and it is from the same sources that the fairest anticipations may be derived in favour of the public happiness."

Noticing the unanimous vote that had once again brought him to this position, "we want to sincerely and promptly take this opportunity to congratulate you on such a distinguished mark of public approval, and we have complete confidence in the integrity and patriotism of the reasons behind this response to your country’s call. It is," the speech continued, "to the virtues that have earned long-lasting respect and the services that have provided significant and enduring benefits that we can offer praise without any hint of flattery; and it is from these same qualities that we can draw the best hopes for the public's happiness."

The proclamation of neutrality was approved in guarded terms, and the topics of the speech were noticed in a manner which indicated dispositions cordially to co-operate with the executive.

The declaration of neutrality was accepted with caution, and the subjects of the speech were addressed in a way that showed a willingness to work together with the administration.

On the part of the senate also, the answer to the speech was unfeignedly affectionate. In warm terms they expressed the pleasure which the re-election of the President gave them. "In the unanimity," they added, "which a second time marks this important national act, we trace with particular satisfaction, besides the distinguished tribute paid to the virtues and abilities which it recognizes, another proof of that discernment, and constancy of sentiments and views, which have hitherto characterized the citizens of the United States." Speaking of the proclamation, they declared it to be "a measure well timed and wise, manifesting a watchful solicitude for the welfare of the nation, and calculated to promote it."

On the part of the Senate, the response to the speech was genuinely warm and affectionate. They expressed, in enthusiastic terms, how pleased they were with the President's re-election. "In the unanimity," they added, "that this important national act shows for the second time, we see with particular satisfaction, in addition to the significant tribute to the virtues and abilities it acknowledges, further proof of the insight and consistency in feelings and views that have historically defined the citizens of the United States." Discussing the proclamation, they stated it was "a well-timed and wise measure, showing a careful concern for the nation's well-being and aimed at promoting it."

In a few days, a confidential message was delivered, communicating the critical situation of affairs with Spain. The negotiations attempted with that power in regard to the interesting objects of boundary, navigation, and commerce, had been exposed to much delay and embarrassment, in consequence of the changes which the French revolution had effected in the political state of Europe. Meanwhile, the neighborhood of the Spanish colonies to the United States had given rise to various other subjects of discussion, one of which had assumed a very serious aspect.

In a few days, a secret message was delivered, outlining the critical situation with Spain. The negotiations with that country concerning important issues like borders, navigation, and trade had faced significant delays and complications due to the changes the French Revolution had brought about in Europe's political landscape. Meanwhile, the proximity of the Spanish colonies to the United States had led to several other topics of discussion, one of which had become quite serious.

Having the best reason to suppose that the hostility of the southern Indians was excited by the agents of Spain, the President had directed the American commissioners at Madrid to make the proper representations on the subject, and to propose that each nation should, with good faith, promote the peace of the other with their savage neighbours.

Having strong reason to believe that the southern Indians' hostility was stirred up by Spanish agents, the President instructed the American commissioners in Madrid to address this issue and suggest that both nations should genuinely work together to promote peace with their Native neighbors.

About the same time, the Spanish government entertained, or affected to entertain, corresponding suspicions of like hostile excitements by the agents of the United States, to disturb their peace with the same nations. The representations which were induced by these real or affected suspicions, were accompanied with pretensions, and made in a style, to which the American executive could not be inattentive. His Catholic Majesty asserted these claims as a patron and protector of those Indians. He assumed a right to mediate between them and the United States, and to interfere in the establishment of their boundaries. At length, in the very moment when those savages were committing daily inroads on the American frontier, at the instigation of Spain, as was believed, the representatives of that power, complaining of the aggressions of American citizens on the Indians, declared "that the continuation of the peace, good harmony, and perfect friendship of the two nations, was very problematical for the future, unless the United States should take more convenient measures, and of greater energy than those adopted for a long time past."

Around the same time, the Spanish government showed, or pretended to show, suspicions that agents from the United States were stirring up trouble to disrupt their relations with certain nations. The claims made based on these genuine or pretended suspicions came with assertions and were communicated in a way that the American leadership couldn't ignore. His Catholic Majesty claimed these rights as a supporter and protector of those Native Americans. He insisted he had the right to mediate between them and the United States and to get involved in setting their borders. Eventually, at the very moment when those Native Americans were repeatedly attacking the American frontier, reportedly at Spain's instigation, representatives from Spain, complaining about Americans' actions against the Native Americans, declared "that the continuation of peace, good relations, and perfect friendship between the two nations was highly uncertain for the future unless the United States took more effective and vigorous measures than those it had used for a long time."

Notwithstanding the zeal and enthusiasm with which the pretensions of the French republic, as asserted by their minister, continued to be supported out of doors, they found no open advocate in either branch of the legislature. That this circumstance is, in a great measure, to be ascribed to the temperate conduct of the executive, and to the convincing arguments with which its decisions were supported, ought not to be doubted. But when it is recollected that the odium which these decisions excited, sustained no diminution; that the accusation of hostility to France and to liberty, which originated in them, was not retracted; that, when afterwards many of the controverted claims were renewed by France, her former advocates still adhered to her; it is not unreasonable to suppose that other considerations mingled themselves with the conviction which the correspondence laid before the legislature was calculated to produce.

Despite the passion and enthusiasm with which the French republic’s claims, as presented by their minister, were still supported publicly, they had no open supporters in either part of the legislature. This situation can largely be attributed to the moderate actions of the executive and the convincing arguments backing its decisions, and that’s not up for debate. However, when we recall that the resentment these decisions stirred up never faded, and that the accusation of being hostile to France and liberty, which arose from them, was never retracted, it’s clear that when many of the disputed claims were brought up again by France, her former supporters still stood by her. Therefore, it’s reasonable to think that other factors were at play alongside the persuasive correspondence presented to the legislature.

An attack on the administration could be placed on no ground more disadvantageous than on its controversy with Mr. Genet. The conduct and language of that minister were offensive to reflecting men of all parties. The President had himself taken so decisive a part in favour of the measures which had been adopted, that they must be ascribed to him, not to his cabinet; and, of consequence, the whole weight of his personal character must be directly encountered, in an attempt to censure those measures. From this censure it would have been difficult to extricate the person who was contemplated by the party in opposition as its chief; for the secretary of state had urged the arguments of the administration with a degree of ability and earnestness, which ought to have silenced the suspicion that he might not feel their force.

An attack on the administration couldn't be made on a more disadvantageous basis than its conflict with Mr. Genet. The actions and words of that minister were upsetting to thoughtful people from all parties. The President had taken such a strong stance in support of the measures that had been implemented that they had to be credited to him, not his cabinet; therefore, any criticism of those measures would have to confront the full weight of his personal reputation. It would have been hard to separate the person seen by the opposing party as its leader from such criticism; the secretary of state had defended the administration's arguments with such skill and passion that it should have put to rest any doubts about whether he believed in them.

The expression of a legislative opinion, in favour of the points insisted on by the French minister, would probably have involved the nation in a calamitous war, the whole responsibility for which would rest on them.

The expression of a legislative opinion in favor of the points urged by the French minister would likely have led the nation into a disastrous war, the entire blame for which would fall on them.

To these considerations was added another which could not be disregarded. The party in France, to which Mr. Genet owed his appointment, had lost its power; and his fall was the inevitable consequence of the fall of his patrons. That he would probably be recalled was known in America; and that his conduct had been disapproved by his government was generally believed. The future system of the French republic, with regard to the United States, could not be foreseen; and it would be committing something to hazard, not to wait its development.

To these thoughts was added another that couldn’t be ignored. The political group in France that appointed Mr. Genet had lost its influence, and his downfall was the unavoidable result of his patrons' decline. It was known in America that he would likely be recalled, and it was widely believed that his actions had been disapproved by his government. The future relationship between the French republic and the United States was uncertain, and it would be risky not to wait for it to unfold.

These objections did not exist to an indulgence of the partialities and prejudices of the nation towards the belligerent powers, in measures suggested by its resentment against Great Britain. But, independent of these considerations, it is scarcely possible to doubt that congress really approved the conduct of the executive with regard to France, and was also convinced that a course of hostility had been pursued by Great Britain, which the national interest and the national honour required them to repel. In the irritable state of the public temper, it was not difficult to produce this opinion.

These objections didn't apply to indulging the nation's biases and prejudices toward the warring powers, based on its resentment against Great Britain. However, aside from this, it's hard to deny that Congress truly supported the executive's actions concerning France, and also believed that Great Britain was pursuing a course of hostility that the nation's interests and honor demanded they resist. Given the tense public mood, it was easy to foster this opinion.

In addition to the causes of dissatisfaction with Great Britain which have already been suggested, others soon occurred. Under her auspices, a truce for one year had been lately negotiated between Portugal and the Regency of Algiers, which, by withdrawing a small squadron stationed during the war, by the former power, in the Streights, opened a passage into the Atlantic to the cruisers of the latter. The capture of American merchantmen, which was the immediate consequence of this measure, was believed, in the United States, to have been its motive. Not admitting the possibility that a desire to extricate Portugal from a war unproductive of any advantages, and to leave her maritime force free to act elsewhere, could have induced this interposition of England, the Americans ascribed it, exclusively, to that enmity to their commerce, and to that jealousy of its prosperity, which had, as they conceived, long marked the conduct of those who administered the affairs of that nation.

In addition to the reasons for dissatisfaction with Great Britain that have already been mentioned, more soon emerged. Recently, under her guidance, a one-year truce was negotiated between Portugal and the Regency of Algiers, which, by withdrawing a small squadron stationed during the war by Portugal in the Straits, opened a passage into the Atlantic for Algiers' cruisers. The capture of American merchant ships, which was the immediate result of this action, was believed in the United States to be its motive. Rather than considering that England might have intervened to help Portugal avoid a war that brought no benefits and to allow her naval force to operate elsewhere, Americans attributed it solely to a hostility towards their trade and a jealousy of its success that they felt had long characterized the actions of those in control of that nation’s affairs.

This transaction was afterwards explained by England, and was ascribed to her desire to serve an ally, and to enable that ally to act more efficaciously in a common cause.

This transaction was later clarified by England and was attributed to her desire to support an ally and to help that ally act more effectively in a shared cause.

 

George Washington

George Washington

From the painting by Charles Willson Peale.

From the painting by Charles Willson Peale.

In June, 1783, Washington spent some time in Princeton, New Jersey, whither the Continental Congress had adjourned from Philadelphia in consequence of a mutiny among the unpaid troops stationed there. On leaving Princeton the American Commander-in-Chief donated 50 guineas to the College of New Jersey, now Princeton University. The trustees spent the money on this portrait and had it put in the frame formerly occupied by a picture of King George III, which was destroyed by a cannon ball in the Battle of Princeton. This canvas still hangs in the Princeton Faculty room.

In June 1783, Washington spent some time in Princeton, New Jersey, where the Continental Congress had moved from Philadelphia due to a mutiny among the unpaid troops stationed there. When leaving Princeton, the American Commander-in-Chief donated 50 guineas to the College of New Jersey, now Princeton University. The trustees used the money for this portrait and placed it in the frame that used to hold a picture of King George III, which was destroyed by a cannonball during the Battle of Princeton. This canvas still hangs in the Princeton Faculty room.

By Courtesy of Princeton University

Courtesy of Princeton University

 

From governments accustomed to trust rather to artifice, than to force or to reason, and influenced by vindictive passions which they have not strength or courage to gratify, hostility may be expected to exert itself in a cruel insidious policy, which unfeelingly dooms individuals to chains, and involves them in ruin, without having a tendency to effect any national object. But the British character rather wounds by its pride, and offends by its haughtiness, and open violence, than injures by the secret indulgence of a malignant, but a paltry and unprofitable revenge: and, certainly, such unworthy motives ought not lightly to be imputed to a great and magnanimous nation, which dares to encounter a world, and risk its existence, for the preservation of its station in the scale of empires, of its real independence, and of its liberty.

From governments that rely more on manipulation than on trust, and driven by vengeful emotions they lack the strength or courage to satisfy, we can expect hostility to take the form of a cruel, insidious policy that coldly condemns individuals to bondage and leads them to ruin, without achieving any national objective. However, the British character tends to hurt through its pride and offend through its arrogance and open aggression rather than harm through the covert indulgence of a spiteful, yet trivial and unproductive revenge. Certainly, such unworthy motives should not be casually attributed to a great and noble nation that dares to face the world and risk its existence in order to maintain its position among empires, its genuine independence, and its freedom.

But, in believing the views of the British cabinet to be unfriendly to the United States, America was perhaps not entirely mistaken. Indeed, dispositions of a different nature could not reasonably have been expected. It may be denied, but can not be disguised, that the sentiments openly expressed by a great majority of the American people, warranted the opinion that, notwithstanding the exertions of the administration, they were about to arrange themselves, in the war, on the side of France. In a government like that of the United States, no firmness on the part of the chief magistrate can long resist the current of popular opinion; and that opinion, without professing it, unquestionably led to war.

But in thinking that the views of the British cabinet were unfriendly to the United States, America might not have been completely wrong. In fact, it was unrealistic to expect a different attitude. It can be denied, but it can't be hidden, that the feelings openly shown by a large majority of the American people supported the idea that, despite the administration's efforts, they were gearing up to side with France in the war. In a government like that of the United States, no amount of determination from the president can hold back the tide of public opinion for long; and that opinion, without being officially stated, undoubtedly pushed towards war.

If the character of the British minister at Philadelphia is to be collected from his intercourse with the executive of the country to which he was deputed, there is reason to suppose that his communications to his own government did not diminish the impression which the evidence furnished on this subject, by the American people themselves, was calculated to make. It is therefore not improbable, whatever may be the permanent views of England respecting the commercial prosperity of the United States, that the measures of the British cabinet, about this time, were taken in the belief that war between the two nations was a probable event.

If we can understand the character of the British minister in Philadelphia based on his interactions with the U.S. government, it's likely that his reports to his own government did not lessen the impact of the evidence provided by the American people on this issue. Therefore, it's quite possible that, regardless of England’s long-term views on the commercial success of the United States, the actions of the British cabinet around this time were influenced by the belief that war between the two nations was a likely outcome.

Report of the secretary of state in relation to the commerce of the United States.

Early in the session a report was made by the secretary of state, in pursuance of a resolution of the house of representatives passed on the 23d of February, 1791, requiring him "to report to congress the nature and extent of the privileges and restrictions of the commercial intercourse of the United States with foreign nations, and the measures which he should think proper to be adopted for the improvement of the commerce and navigation of the same."

Early in the session, the secretary of state presented a report, following a resolution from the House of Representatives passed on February 23, 1791. This resolution required him "to report to Congress the nature and extent of the privileges and restrictions of the commercial interactions of the United States with foreign nations, and the measures he thought should be taken to improve the commerce and navigation of the country."

This report stated the exports of the United States in articles of their own produce and manufacture at nineteen millions, five hundred and eighty-seven thousand, and fifty-five dollars; and the imports at nineteen millions, eight hundred and twenty-three thousand, and sixty dollars.

This report stated the exports of the United States in products they produced and manufactured at $19,587,055; and the imports at $19,823,060.

Of the exports, nearly one-half was carried to the kingdom of Great Britain and its dominions; of the imports, about four-fifths were brought from the same countries. The American shipping amounted to two hundred and seventy-seven thousand, five hundred and nineteen tons, of which not quite one-sixth was employed in the trade with Great Britain and its dominions.

Of the exports, almost half went to Great Britain and its territories; about four-fifths of the imports came from those same places. American shipping totaled 277,519 tons, with just under one-sixth of that used for trade with Great Britain and its territories.

In all the nations of Europe, most of the articles produced in the United States were subjected to heavy duties, and some of them were prohibited. In England, the trade of the United States was in the general on as good a footing as the trade of other countries; and several articles were more favoured than the same articles of the growth of other countries.

In all the countries of Europe, most products from the United States faced high tariffs, and some were banned altogether. In England, trade with the United States was generally on par with that of other nations, and several items were favored more than similar items from other countries.

The statements and arguments of this report tended to enforce the policy of making discriminations which might favour the commerce of the United States with France, and discourage that with England; and which might promote the increase of American navigation as a branch of industry, and a resource of defence.

The statements and arguments in this report aimed to support a policy that would favor trade between the United States and France while discouraging trade with England. This policy was also intended to boost American shipping as an industry and a means of defense.

This was the last official act of the secretary of state. Early in the preceding summer, he had signified to the President his intention to retire in September from the public service; and had, with some reluctance, consented to postpone the execution of this intention to the close of the year. Retaining his purpose, he resigned his office on the last day of December.

This was the final official action of the secretary of state. Earlier that summer, he had informed the President of his plan to step down from public service in September; and, with some hesitation, agreed to delay this decision until the end of the year. Sticking to his plan, he resigned from his position on the last day of December.

He resigns.

This gentleman withdrew from political station at a moment when he stood particularly high in the esteem of his countrymen. His determined opposition to the financial schemes which had been proposed by the secretary of the treasury, and approved by the legislative and executive departments of the government; his ardent and undisguised attachment to the revolutionary party in France; the dispositions which he was declared to possess in regard to Great Britain; and the popularity of his opinions respecting the constitution of the United States; had devoted to him that immense party whose sentiments were supposed to comport with his, on most, or all of these interesting subjects. To the opposite party he had, of course, become particularly unacceptable. But the publication of his correspondence with Mr. Genet dissipated much of the prejudice which had been excited against him. He had, in that correspondence, maintained with great ability the opinions embraced by the federalists on those points of difference which had arisen between the two republics; and which, having become universally the subjects of discussion, had in some measure displaced those topics on which parties were previously divided. The partiality for France that was conspicuous through the whole of it, detracted nothing from its merit in the opinion of the friends of the administration, because, however decided their determination to support their own government in a controversy with any nation whatever, they felt all the partialities for that republic which the correspondence expressed. The hostility of his enemies therefore was, for a time, considerably lessened, without a corresponding diminution of the attachment of his friends. It would have been impracticable, in office, long to preserve these dispositions. And it would have been difficult to maintain that ascendency which he held over the minds of those who had supported, and probably would continue to support, every pretension of the French republic, without departing from principles and measures which he had openly and ably defended.

This gentleman stepped back from politics at a time when he was highly regarded by his fellow citizens. His firm opposition to the financial plans proposed by the secretary of the treasury, which had the backing of both the legislative and executive branches; his strong and open support for the revolutionary party in France; his views on Great Britain; and the popularity of his beliefs about the U.S. Constitution earned him a large party whose views aligned with his on most, if not all, of these important issues. Naturally, he became particularly unwelcome to the opposing party. However, the release of his letters with Mr. Genet helped to dispel much of the bias against him. In those letters, he skillfully defended the federalist views on the differences that arose between the two republics; these topics had become widely discussed and somewhat overshadowed the issues that had previously divided the parties. The evident preference for France throughout the correspondence did not diminish its value in the eyes of the administration's supporters, who, despite their strong commitment to backing their own government in any international conflict, shared the affection for that republic expressed in the letters. Consequently, the animosity from his opponents lessened significantly, without a corresponding decline in his supporters' loyalty. It would have been impossible to maintain these feelings while in office for long. Moreover, it would have been challenging to sustain the influence he had over those who supported or would likely continue to support every claim of the French republic without straying from the principles and strategies he had openly and effectively defended.

Is succeeded by Mr. Randolph.

He was immediately succeeded by Mr. Edmund Randolph; and the office of attorney general was filled by Mr. William Bradford, a gentleman of considerable eminence in Pennsylvania.

He was quickly succeeded by Mr. Edmund Randolph, and Mr. William Bradford, a prominent figure in Pennsylvania, took over as attorney general.

1794

On the fourth of January, the house resolved itself into a committee of the whole, on the report of the secretary of state, relative to the privileges and restrictions of the commerce of the United States; when Mr. Madison, after some prefatory observations, laid on the table a series of resolutions[13] for the consideration of the members.

On January 4th, the house gathered as a whole to discuss the report from the Secretary of State regarding the privileges and restrictions of U.S. commerce. Mr. Madison, after some introductory remarks, presented a series of resolutions[13] for the members to consider.

Mr. Madison's resolutions founded on the above report.

These memorable resolutions embraced almost completely the idea of the report. They imposed an additional duty on the manufactures, and on the tonnage of vessels, of nations having no commercial treaty with the United States; while they reduced the duties already imposed by law, on the tonnage of vessels belonging to nations having such commercial treaty: and they reciprocated the restrictions which were imposed on American navigation.

These notable resolutions mostly captured the essence of the report. They added extra duties on manufacturers and the tonnage of ships from countries without a trade agreement with the United States, while also lowering the duties already set by law on the tonnage of ships from countries with such trade agreements. Additionally, they mirrored the restrictions placed on American shipping.

Debate thereon.

On the 13th of January they were taken into consideration, when the debate was opened by Mr. Smith of South Carolina.

On January 13th, they were brought up for discussion, starting with a debate led by Mr. Smith of South Carolina.

After noticing the importance of the subject to the best interests of the United States, he observed that, being purely commercial in its nature, he would exclude from the view he should take of it, those political considerations which some might think connected with it. He imagined it would be right to dismiss, for the present, all questions respecting the Indians, Algerines, and western posts. There would be a time for these questions; and then he should give his opinion upon them with firmness, and according to what he conceived to be the true interests of his country. The regulation of commerce gave of itself sufficient scope for argument, without mixing it with extraneous matter.

After realizing how important the topic was for the best interests of the United States, he noted that, since it was purely commercial, he would set aside any political considerations that some might think were linked to it. He believed it was best to temporarily put aside all questions related to the Indians, Algerines, and western posts. There would be a time for those issues, and at that point, he would express his views on them confidently, based on what he believed were the true interests of his country. The regulation of commerce offered plenty of ground for debate without bringing in unrelated issues.

After some general observations on the delicacy of the crisis, and on the claims of the resolutions to dispassionate investigation, he proceeded to consider the report on which they were founded.

After making some general comments about the sensitivity of the crisis and the need for an objective examination of the resolutions, he went on to examine the report that they were based on.

The great object of that report being to establish a contrast between France and Britain, he would request the attention of the committee to an accurate statement of facts, which, being compared with the report, would enable them to decide on the justness of its inferences.

The main goal of that report is to highlight the differences between France and Britain. He asks the committee to pay attention to a precise presentation of facts, which, when compared with the report, will help them determine the validity of its conclusions.

In the opinion that any late relaxations of the French republic were produced by interests too momentary and fluctuating to be taken as the basis of calculations for a permanent system, he should present a comparative view of the commerce of the United States to those countries, as it stood anterior to the revolution of France. For this purpose, he produced a table which had been formed by a person whose commercial information was highly respectable, from which he said it would appear, notwithstanding the plaudits so generally bestowed on the justice and liberality of the one nation, and the reproaches uttered against the other, that, with the exception of the trifling article of fish oil, the commerce of the United States was not more favoured in France than in Great Britain, and was, in many important articles, more favoured by the latter power, than that of other nations.

In his view, any recent relaxations of the French republic were driven by interests that were too temporary and unstable to serve as a foundation for a permanent system. He should provide a comparative overview of U.S. commerce with those countries, as it existed before the French Revolution. To illustrate this, he presented a table created by someone with highly respected commercial knowledge, which he claimed showed that, despite the widespread praise for the fairness and generosity of one nation, and the criticism directed at the other, the U.S. commerce was not favored in France more than in Great Britain, and for many important goods, it was more favored by Great Britain than by other nations, except for the minor item of fish oil.

Mr. Smith then reviewed, in detail, the advantages and disadvantages attending the sale of the great products of America in the ports of each nation, which, he conceived, were more encouraged by the British than by the French market.

Mr. Smith then looked closely at the pros and cons of selling America's major products in the ports of each country, which he believed were more supported by the British market than by the French market.

A comparative statement, he added, of the value of the exports of the two countries, would assist in confirming this opinion.

A comparison of the export values of the two countries would help support this viewpoint, he added.

The value of the exports to Great Britain, at the close of the year ending with September, 1789, was nearly double those made to France in the same period: and even the average of the years 1790, 1791 and 1792, gave an annual excess to the exports to Great Britain of three millions, seven hundred and fifty-two thousand, seven hundred and sixty dollars.

The value of exports to Great Britain by the end of the year in September 1789 was nearly double that of exports to France during the same period. Even the average for the years 1790, 1791, and 1792 showed an annual surplus in exports to Great Britain of three million, seven hundred fifty-two thousand, seven hundred sixty dollars.

The great amount of merchandise imported from Britain, instead of being a grievance, demonstrated, in the opinion of Mr. Smith, the utility of the trade with that country. For the extent of the intercourse between the two nations, several obvious reasons might be assigned. Britain was the first manufacturing country in the world, and was more able, than any other, to supply an assortment of those articles which were required in the United States. She entitled herself, too, to the preference which was given her, by the extensive credit she afforded. To a young country wanting capital, credit was of immense advantage. It enabled them to flourish by the aid of foreign capital, the use of which had, more than any other circumstance, nourished the industry of America.

The large amount of goods imported from Britain, instead of being a problem, showed, according to Mr. Smith, the value of trading with that country. There were several clear reasons for the extent of interaction between the two nations. Britain was the first manufacturing nation in the world and was better equipped than any other to supply a variety of products needed in the United States. She also earned the preference she received due to the significant credit she provided. For a young country in need of capital, credit was extremely important. It allowed them to thrive with the help of foreign investment, which had supported the growth of American industry more than anything else.

By the advocates for forcing a trade with France, it was asserted that she could supply the wants of America on better terms than Great Britain. To do this, she must not only sell cheaper, but give credit, which, it was known her merchants either could not, or would not give.

By those supporting a trade deal with France, it was claimed that she could meet America's needs on better terms than Great Britain. To achieve this, she would need to not only offer lower prices but also provide credit, which, as was known, her merchants either couldn't or wouldn't do.

The very necessity of laying a duty on British manufactures, in order to find a sale for those of other countries, was a proof that the first could be purchased on better terms, or were better adapted to the market.

The need to impose a tax on British goods to sell products from other countries showed that British items could be bought at better prices or were more suited to the market.

If the object of the resolutions were the encouragement of domestic manufactures, there might be some semblance of argument in their favour. But this is not contemplated. Their avowed object is to turn the course of trade from one nation to another, by means which would subject the citizens of the United States to great inconvenience.

If the goal of the resolutions was to promote domestic manufacturing, there might be some basis for arguing in their favor. But that's not what's intended. Their stated purpose is to shift trade from one nation to another, using methods that would cause significant hassle for the citizens of the United States.

Mr. Smith next proceeded to consider the subject with a view to navigation.

Mr. Smith then began to think about the topic in relation to navigation.

The trade of the United States to Great Britain, for the transportation of their own produce, was as free in American as in British bottoms, a few trifling port charges excepted. In France, they enjoyed the advantages granted to the most favoured nation. Thus far the comparison was in favour of Great Britain. In the West Indies, he admitted the existence of a different state of things. All American bottoms were excluded from the British islands, with the exception of Turks island. In the French islands, vessels under sixty tons were admitted, but this advantage was common to all other nations.

The trade between the United States and Great Britain, for transporting their own products, was just as free on American ships as it was on British ones, except for a few minor port fees. In France, they benefited from the privileges given to the most favored nation. Up to this point, the comparison favored Great Britain. In the West Indies, he acknowledged a different situation. All American ships were banned from the British islands, except for Turks Island. In the French islands, vessels under sixty tons were allowed, but this benefit applied to all other nations as well.

The effect of the difference in the regulations of the two rival nations in respect of navigation, was not so considerable as the secretary of state had supposed. He had stated the tonnage employed in the intercourse with France and her colonies, at 116,410 tons; and that employed in the commerce with Great Britain at 43,580 tons. The secretary was led into this miscalculation by taking for his guide, the actual entries of American bottoms from the dominions of each country in the year. As four voyages are made to the West Indies, while only two are made to Europe, the vessels employed in the former traffic will be counted four times in the year, and those employed in the latter will be counted only twice in the same period. The deceptiveness of the calculations made from these data had induced a call on the secretary of the treasury for an account of the actual tonnage employed in trade with foreign nations for one year. This account shows that France employs 82,510 tons, and Great Britain 66,582 tons, of American shipping; leaving in favour of France, an excess of 15,928, instead of 72,830 tons, as reported by the secretary of state.

The impact of the differences in navigation regulations between the two competing nations wasn’t as significant as the Secretary of State had thought. He claimed the tonnage used in trade with France and its colonies was 116,410 tons, while the tonnage for trade with Great Britain was 43,580 tons. The Secretary made this error by relying on actual entries of American ships coming from each country that year. Since there are four trips to the West Indies for every two trips to Europe, ships involved in the former will be counted four times in a year, while those in the latter will only be counted twice. The misleading nature of the calculations based on this data prompted the Secretary of the Treasury to provide an account of the actual tonnage used in foreign trade over one year. This report shows that France uses 82,510 tons and Great Britain 66,582 tons of American shipping, resulting in a surplus of 15,928 tons in favor of France, rather than the 72,830 tons reported by the Secretary of State.

From this comparative view taken of the regulations of the two nations, Mr. Smith conceived himself justified in saying, that the commercial system of Great Britain towards the United States, far from being hostile, was friendly; and that she made many discriminations in their favour. France, on the contrary, placed them on a better situation than her rival, only in one solitary instance, the unimportant article of fish oil.

From this comparison of the regulations of the two nations, Mr. Smith felt justified in saying that Great Britain's commercial system towards the United States was not hostile, but rather friendly; and that it made many distinctions in their favor. France, on the other hand, only provided a better situation for them than her rival in one instance, the insignificant item of fish oil.

If this be a true picture of the existing state of things, and he could not perceive in what it was defective, was it not time, he asked, that the deceptions practised on the people by the eulogists of France and the revilers of Great Britain, should be removed?

If this is an accurate portrayal of the current situation, and he couldn't see what was wrong with it, he wondered if it was time to expose the lies being spread about the people by the admirers of France and the critics of Great Britain.

The resolutions were supported by Mr. Madison, Mr. Findley, Mr. Nicholas, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Smiley, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Giles.

The resolutions were backed by Mr. Madison, Mr. Findley, Mr. Nicholas, Mr. Clarke, Mr. Smiley, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Giles.

They admitted the subject before the committee to be of a commercial nature, but conceived it to be impracticable to do justice to the interests of the United States, without some allusions to politics. The question was in some measure general. They were to inquire how far it was the interest of this country by commercial regulations to vary the state of commerce now existing. They were of opinion that most of the injuries proceeding from Great Britain were inflicted for the promotion of her commercial objects, and were to be remedied by commercial resistance. The Indian war, and the Algerine attack, originated both in commercial views, or Great Britain must stand without excuse for instigating the most horrid cruelties. The propositions before the committee were the strongest weapon America possessed, and would, more probably than any other, restore her to all her political and commercial rights. They professed themselves the friends of free trade, and declared the opinion that it would be to the general advantage, if all commerce was free. But this rule was not without its exceptions. The navigation act of Great Britain was a proof of the effect of one exception on the prosperity of national commerce. The effect produced by that act was equally rapid and extensive.

They acknowledged that the topic discussed before the committee was commercial in nature, but they believed it was impossible to address the interests of the United States without touching on politics. The question was somewhat general. They needed to explore how the country could adjust its commercial regulations to change the current state of commerce. They thought that most of the harm caused by Great Britain was aimed at advancing its commercial interests and could be countered through commercial resistance. The Indian war and the Algerian attack both stemmed from commercial motivations, or else Great Britain would have no excuse for inciting such terrible atrocities. The proposals being discussed in the committee were America's strongest tool and were likely to restore her political and commercial rights more than anything else. They claimed to support free trade and stated that it would benefit everyone if all commerce were free. However, this principle had its exceptions. The Navigation Act of Great Britain illustrated how one such exception could impact a nation's commercial prosperity. The effects of that act were both swift and far-reaching.

There is another exception to the advantages of a free trade, where the situation of a country is such with respect to another, that by duties on the commodities of that other, it shall not only invigorate its own means of rivalship, but draw from that other the hands employed in the production of those commodities. When such an effect can be produced, it is so much clear gain, and is consistent with the general theory of national rights.

There’s another exception to the benefits of free trade, where one country’s situation in relation to another is such that by imposing tariffs on that other country’s goods, it not only strengthens its own competitive position but also takes away the workforce involved in producing those goods. When this happens, it’s a clear advantage and aligns with the overall theory of national rights.

The effect of leaving commerce to regulate itself is to submit it to the regulation of other nations. If the United States had a commercial intercourse with one nation only, and should permit a free trade, while that nation proceeded on a monopolizing system, would not the carrying trade be transferred to that nation, and with it, the maritime strength it confers be heaped upon a rival? Then, in the same proportion to the freedom granted to the vessels of other nations in the United States, and to the burdens other nations impose on American vessels, will be the transfer of those maritime resources.

The impact of letting trade manage itself is that it ends up being controlled by other countries. If the United States only traded with one country and allowed free trade, while that country operated on a monopolistic system, wouldn’t the shipping trade move to that country, along with the maritime power it brings, becoming a benefit for a competitor? Then, the more freedom given to the ships of other nations in the U.S. and the pressures other nations put on American ships, the more maritime resources will shift away from the U.S.

The propositions before the committee should be examined as they concern navigation, manufactures, and the just principles of discrimination that ought to prevail in their policy to nations having treaties with them.

The proposals being considered by the committee should be reviewed as they relate to navigation, manufacturing, and the fair principles of discrimination that should guide their policies towards nations they have treaties with.

With respect to navigation, it was conceded that they were not placed upon the same footing by the two nations with whom they had the greatest commercial intercourse. British vessels could bring the produce of all countries into any port of the United States; while American vessels could carry to the ports of Britain only their own commodities, and those only to a part of her dominions. From her ports in the West Indies they were entirely excluded.

In terms of navigation, it was agreed that they were not on equal terms with the two nations they traded with the most. British ships could bring goods from all countries into any U.S. port, while American ships could only transport their own products to British ports, and that was limited to only some of her territories. They were completely shut out from her ports in the West Indies.

To exhibit at a glance the effect of the British navigation act, it was sufficient to compare the quantity of American and British tonnage employed in their intercourse with each other. The former in 1790 amounted to 43,000 tons, and the latter to 240,000 tons. The effect of British policy would be further shown by showing the proportion of domestic tonnage employed at the same time in the intercourse with other European nations. With Spain the American was to the Spanish as five to one, with Portugal six to one, Netherlands fifteen to one, Denmark twelve to one, France five to one, Great Britain one to five. This ratio had by particular circumstances been somewhat changed. From calculations founded on the documents last introduced into the house, it appeared that, at present, the proportion of American to foreign tonnage employed in the American trade was, with Spain as sixteen to one, Portugal seventeen to one, Netherlands twenty-six to one, Denmark fifteen to one, Russia fourteen to one, France between four and five to one, and Great Britain one to three.

To quickly show the impact of the British navigation act, we just need to compare the amount of American and British shipping used in their trade with each other. In 1790, American shipping totaled 43,000 tons, while British shipping was 240,000 tons. The impact of British policy can also be seen in the ratio of domestic shipping used in trade with other European countries. With Spain, the American shipping was five times that of Spanish; with Portugal, it was six to one; with the Netherlands, fifteen to one; with Denmark, twelve to one; with France, five to one; and with Great Britain, one to five. This ratio has changed somewhat due to specific circumstances. Based on calculations from the documents recently presented to the house, it appears that currently, the ratio of American to foreign shipping used in American trade is sixteen to one with Spain, seventeen to one with Portugal, twenty-six to one with the Netherlands, fifteen to one with Denmark, fourteen to one with Russia, between four and five to one with France, and one to three with Great Britain.

The situation of American commerce was the more mortifying when the nature and amount of their exports came to be considered. They were not only necessaries of life, or necessaries for manufactures, and therefore of life to the manufacturer, but their bulkiness gave them an advantage over the exports of every other country. If America, to increase her maritime strength, should secure to herself the transportation of her own commodities, leaving to other nations the transportation of theirs, it would greatly augment the proportion of her shipping and of her sailors.

The state of American trade was even more embarrassing when you considered the type and quantity of their exports. They weren't just essentials for living or needed for manufacturing, which made them vital to manufacturers, but their size also gave them an edge over the exports from other countries. If America were to boost its maritime strength by handling the transportation of its own goods while allowing other countries to transport theirs, it would significantly increase the amount of its shipping and sailors.

In relation to manufactures, the regulations existing between the United States and Great Britain were not more equal. Out of the whole amount of manufactured articles imported into this country, which was stated in round numbers at fifteen millions, two hundred and ninety thousand dollars, Great Britain furnished thirteen millions, nine hundred and sixty thousand. In the same period, in the year 1789-90, the articles which the United States received from France, a country which actually consumed more of their produce, amounted only to one hundred and fifty-five thousand dollars. The balance of trade, at the same epoch, was greatly in favour of the United States with every other nation, and greatly against them with Britain. Although it might happen in some cases, that other advantages might be derived from an intercourse with a particular nation, which might compensate for an unfavourable balance of trade, it was impossible that this could happen in the intercourse with Great Britain. Other nations, however, viewed a balance of trade against them as a real evil; and Great Britain, in particular, was careful to prevent it. What then must be the feelings of a nation, between whom and the United States the most friendly relations existed, when she saw, not only the balance of trade against her, but that what was thus obtained from her, flowed in the same manner into the coffers of one of her most jealous rivals, and inveterate enemies?

When it comes to manufacturing, the trade rules between the United States and Great Britain were anything but fair. Out of the total imports of manufactured goods into the U.S., which amounted to roughly fifteen million, two hundred ninety thousand dollars, Great Britain supplied thirteen million, nine hundred sixty thousand of that. In the same timeframe, during the year 1789-90, the U.S. received only one hundred fifty-five thousand dollars worth of goods from France, which actually consumed more American products. The trade balance at that time was heavily in favor of the United States with every other country, but it was significantly against them with Britain. While there may be cases where other benefits could offset a negative trade balance with a specific nation, that couldn’t happen in trade with Great Britain. Other countries typically saw a trade deficit as a genuine issue, and Britain, in particular, took steps to avoid it. So how must a nation feel when, despite having friendly relations with the United States, she not only finds the trade balance against her but sees that what she provides is enriching one of her most competitive rivals and longstanding foes?

The propriety of discriminating between nations having treaties with the United States, and those having none, was admitted in some states before the establishment of the present government, and was sanctioned by that house during their sittings in New York. It was the practice of nations to make such a discrimination. It was necessary to give value to treaties.

The appropriateness of distinguishing between nations that have treaties with the United States and those that don’t was accepted in some states before the current government was established, and was approved by that group during their meetings in New York. It was common for nations to make such a distinction. It was essential to give treaties their worth.

The disadvantages of depending on a single nation for articles of necessary consumption was strongly pressed; and it was added as an evil of most serious magnitude, more truly alarming than any other of its features, that this commercial dependence produced an influence in their councils which enabled it, the more inconvenient it became by its constant growth, to throw the more obstacles in the way of a necessary remedy.

The drawbacks of relying on just one country for essential goods were emphasized, and it was noted as a significant issue, even more concerning than its other aspects, that this economic dependency created an influence in their decision-making that made it increasingly difficult to implement a necessary solution as it continued to grow.

They entertained no apprehensions of injurious consequences from adopting the proposed resolutions. The interests of Great Britain would not suffer her to retaliate: and the intercourse between the two countries would not be interrupted further than was required by the convenience and the interests of the United States. But if Great Britain should retaliate, the effects of a commercial conflict would be felt by her, much more sensibly, than by the United States. Its effects would be felt in the shipping business, by the merchants, and above all by the manufacturer.

They had no concerns about harmful consequences from accepting the proposed resolutions. Great Britain's interests wouldn’t allow her to retaliate, and the interaction between the two countries would only be disrupted as much as necessary for the convenience and interests of the United States. However, if Great Britain did retaliate, the impact of a trade conflict would affect her much more noticeably than it would the United States. It would be felt in shipping, by merchants, and especially by manufacturers.

Calculations were offered, by comparing the total amount of British exports with those to the United States, to prove, that three hundred thousand British manufacturers would be suddenly thrown out of employment, by withdrawing the trade carried on between America and that country. In the complication of distress to which such a measure would reduce them, they would consider the United States as a natural asylum from wretchedness. But whether they remained in discontent at home, or sought their fortune abroad, the evil would be considered and felt by the British government as equally great, and they would surely beware of taking any step that might provoke it.

Calculations were presented by comparing the total value of British exports with those to the United States to show that three hundred thousand British manufacturers would suddenly lose their jobs if trade with America was cut off. In the complicated situation of distress that such a move would create, they would view the United States as a natural refuge from their misery. However, whether they stayed unhappy at home or went abroad in search of better opportunities, the issue would be recognized and felt by the British government as equally serious, and they would be careful not to take any actions that could provoke it.

On the advantages of America in such a contest with a populous and manufacturing country, they dwelt with peculiar earnestness. She produced all the necessaries of life within herself, and could dispense with the articles received from others. But Great Britain, not producing them in sufficient abundance, was dependent on the United States for the supply of her most essential wants. Again, the manufacturer of that country was dependent on this for the sale of his merchandise which was to purchase his bread. Thus was produced a double dependence of Great Britain on the United States. She was also dependent on them for the raw materials which formed the basis of her manufactures. Her West Indies were almost completely dependent. This country furnished the best market for their productions, and was almost the only one which could supply them with the necessaries of life. The regulation excluding the provisions of other foreign countries was entitled to no consideration. It was of ancient date, and had remained untouched because there was no other foreign country by which provisions could be supplied.

They emphasized the advantages America had in a competition against a densely populated manufacturing nation. America produced all the essentials for life on its own and didn't need products from elsewhere. However, Great Britain, not producing enough on its own, relied on the United States for its most critical needs. Furthermore, manufacturers in Great Britain depended on America to sell their goods, which in turn provided them with income to support themselves. This created a mutual dependency of Great Britain on the United States. They also relied on the U.S. for the raw materials needed for their manufacturing. The West Indies were nearly fully dependent as well. This country offered the best market for their products and was almost the only source for their basic necessities. The regulation that excluded provisions from other foreign countries deserved no consideration. It was old and had remained in place because there was no alternative foreign source for food supplies.

That the commercial regulations of Great Britain were as favourable to the United States as to other nations, ought not to satisfy America. If other nations were willing to bear impositions, or were unable to retaliate, their examples were not worthy of imitation. America was in a condition to insist, and ought to insist, on perfect commercial equality.

That the trade rules of Great Britain were as beneficial to the United States as they were to other countries shouldn't be enough for America. If other nations were willing to accept burdens or couldn't respond in kind, their examples weren't worth following. America was in a position to demand, and should demand, complete commercial equality.

It was denied that any real advantage was derived from the extensive credit given by the merchants of Great Britain. On the contrary, the use made of British capital was pronounced a great political evil. It increased the unfavourable balance of trade, discouraged domestic manufactures, and promoted luxury. But its greatest mischief was, that it favoured a system of British influence, which was dangerous to their political security.

It was claimed that no real benefit came from the extensive credit extended by British merchants. In fact, the use of British capital was deemed a significant political harm. It worsened the unfavorable balance of trade, discouraged local manufacturing, and encouraged luxury. However, its biggest problem was that it supported a system of British influence, which posed a threat to their political security.

As the debate advanced, the expressions of exasperation against Britain became stronger; and occasionally allusions were made to those party questions which had long agitated the public mind, with a bitterness which marked their intimate connexion with the conduct of the United States to foreign countries.

As the debate progressed, feelings of frustration towards Britain intensified; and now and then, references were made to those political issues that had long stirred public opinion, with a bitterness that highlighted their close relationship with how the United States interacted with other countries.

It was said to be proper in deciding the question under debate, to take into view political, as well as commercial considerations. Ill will and jealousy had at all times been the predominant features of the conduct of England to the United States. That government had grossly violated the treaty of peace, had declined a commercial treaty, had instigated the Indians to raise the tomahawk and scalping knife against American citizens, had let loose the Algerines upon their unprotected commerce, and had insulted their flag, and pillaged their trade in every quarter of the world. These facts being notorious, it was astonishing to hear gentlemen ask how had Britain injured their commerce?

It was considered appropriate to take into account both political and commercial factors in addressing the issue at hand. Hostility and jealousy had always been key aspects of England's relationship with the United States. That government had seriously violated the peace treaty, refused to negotiate a commercial treaty, encouraged Native Americans to attack American citizens, unleashed the Algerians on their vulnerable trade, disrespected their flag, and looted their commerce globally. Given these well-known facts, it was surprising to hear people question how Britain had harmed their trade.

The conduct of France, on the contrary, had been warm and friendly. That nation respected American rights, and had offered to enter into commercial arrangements on the liberal basis of perfect reciprocity.

The actions of France, on the other hand, had been warm and friendly. That country respected American rights and had proposed to establish trade agreements based on the principle of complete reciprocity.

The period which Mr. Smith had taken as that at which the systems of the two nations should be compared with each other, was reprobated with peculiar severity. It was insinuated to proceed from a wish that the United States should directly countenance the restoration of despotism; and much regret was expressed that a distrust of the permanency of the French revolution should be avowed. It was hoped and believed that the present was the settled state of things; and that the old order of things was unsettled for ever: that the French revolution was as much more permanent than had been the French despotism, as was the great fabric of nature, than the petty plastic productions of art. To exclude the period since the revolution, would be to exclude some of the strongest evidences of the friendship of one nation, and the enmity of the other.

The time that Mr. Smith chose to compare the systems of the two nations was criticized intensely. It was suggested that this choice stemmed from a desire for the United States to openly support the return of tyranny, and there was much disappointment that anyone would openly doubt the stability of the French revolution. Many hoped and believed that the current situation was permanent; that the old ways were gone forever. The French revolution was seen as much more stable than French despotism had ever been, just like the great structure of nature is far more lasting than the trivial creations of human art. Leaving out the period since the revolution would mean ignoring some of the clearest signs of one nation's friendship and the other's hostility.

The animadversions which had been made on the report of the secretary of state were retorted with acrimony. It was declared that he would not suffer by a comparison in point of intelligence, accuracy, and patriotism, either with the laborious compiler of the table produced by Mr. Smith, or with the gentleman who had been judiciously selected for its interpreter. Some explanations were given of the inaccuracies which had been alleged; and the facts omitted were declared to be immaterial circumstances, which, if inserted, would have swelled the report, without adding to the information it communicated.

The criticisms of the secretary of state's report were met with sharp replies. It was stated that he would not fall short in terms of intelligence, accuracy, and patriotism when compared to the diligent compiler of the table presented by Mr. Smith or the gentleman chosen to interpret it. Some clarifications were provided regarding the supposed inaccuracies, and the omitted facts were said to be unimportant details that, if included, would have made the report longer without enhancing the information it conveyed.

In reply to the argument which stated that Great Britain did not, in common years, raise a sufficient quantity of grain for her own consumption, and would consequently afford an increasing market for American wheat and flour, it was remarked that this not only established the all important position of the dependence of that country on this, but suggested a very interesting reflection. It was that the continual increase of debt and paper machinery, will not produce a correspondent increase of ability in the nation to feed itself. That an infinity of paper will not produce an infinity of food.

In response to the argument that Great Britain doesn't grow enough grain for its own consumption in regular years, which would mean a growing market for American wheat and flour, it was pointed out that this not only highlights how much that country relies on this supply but also raises an interesting thought. The point was that the constant accumulation of debt and paper money won't lead to a corresponding ability for the nation to feed itself. A mountain of paper won't create a mountain of food.

In contrasting the ability of the two nations to support a commercial conflict, it was said, "Great Britain, tottering under the weight of a king, a court, a nobility, a priesthood, armies, navies, debts, and all the complicated machinery of oppression which serves to increase the number of unproductive, and lessen the number of productive hands; at this moment engaged in a foreign war; taxation already carried to the ultimatum of financial device; the ability of the people already displayed in the payment of taxes, constituting a political phenomenon; all prove the debility of the system, and the decreptitude of old age. On the other hand, the United States, in the flower of youth; increasing in hands; increasing in wealth; and, although an imitative policy had unfortunately prevailed in the erection of a funded debt, in the establishment of an army, the anticipation of a navy,[14] and all the paper machinery for increasing the number of unproductive, and lessening the number of productive hands; yet the operation of natural causes has, as yet, in some degree, countervailed their influence, and still furnish a great superiority in comparison with Great Britain."

In comparing the capacity of the two nations to handle a trade conflict, it was stated, "Great Britain, struggling under the burden of a king, a court, a nobility, a priesthood, armies, navies, debts, and all the complex systems of oppression that increase the number of unproductive people while decreasing the number of productive ones; currently involved in a foreign war; taxes already pushed to the limit of financial strategy; the people’s ability clearly shown through their tax payments, creating a political phenomenon; all demonstrate the weakness of the system and the frailty of old age. On the other hand, the United States, in the prime of youth; growing in workforce; growing in wealth; and, although a copycat approach had unfortunately taken hold in the creation of a funded debt, the establishment of an army, the expectation of a navy,[14] and all the bureaucratic frameworks for increasing the number of unproductive individuals and reducing the number of productive ones; yet the influence of natural factors has, to some extent, countered this impact, still providing a significant advantage compared to Great Britain."

An attempt was made to liken the present situation of America to that in which she stood at the commencement of her revolutionary war; and the arguments drawn from the inconvenience to which a privation of British manufactures would expose the people at large were answered by observing—"This was not the language of America at the time of the non-importation association; this was not her language at the time of the declaration of independence. Whence then this change of American sentiment? Has America less ability than she then had? Is she less prepared for a national trial than she then was? This can not be pretended. There is, it is true, one great change in her political situation. America has now a funded debt: she had no funded debt at those glorious epochs. May not this change of sentiment, therefore, be looked for in her change of situation in this respect? May it not be looked for in the imitative sympathetic organization of our funds with the British funds? May it not be looked for in the indiscriminate participation of citizens and foreigners in the emoluments of the funds? May it not be looked for in the wishes of some to assimilate the government of the United States to that of Great Britain? or at least, in wishes for a more intimate connexion?

An attempt was made to compare America's current situation to what it was like at the start of her revolutionary war; and the arguments about how lacking British goods would be a burden to the general public were countered by pointing out—"This wasn’t how America spoke during the non-importation agreement; this wasn't her stance at the time of the declaration of independence. So where does this shift in American sentiment come from? Does America have less capability now than it did back then? Is she less ready for a national challenge than she was then? That can’t be said. It is true there is one significant change in her political situation. America now has a funded debt: she didn’t have a funded debt during those glorious times. Could this shift in sentiment be due to her changed circumstances in this regard? Could it be related to the similar structure of our funds with the British funds? Could it stem from the mixed involvement of citizens and foreigners in the profits of the funds? Could it be connected to the desire of some to align the government of the United States with that of Great Britain? Or at least, to have a closer relationship?"

"If these causes exist, it is not difficult to find the source of the national debility. It is not difficult to see that the interests of the few, who receive and disburse the public contributions, are more respected than the interest of the great majority of the society, who furnish the contributions. It is not difficult to see that the government, instead of legislating for a few millions, is legislating for a few thousands; and that the sacredness of their rights is the great obstacle to a great national exertion."

"If these issues are present, it’s easy to pinpoint the cause of the nation's weakness. It’s clear that the interests of a small number of people, who handle public funds, are valued more than those of the vast majority of society, who provide those funds. It’s obvious that the government, instead of making laws for millions, is making laws for just a few thousand; and that the importance placed on their rights is the main barrier to significant national effort."

In addition to Mr. Smith, of South Carolina, the resolutions were opposed by Mr. Smith, of Maryland, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Lea, Mr. Dexter, Mr. Ames, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Hartley, Mr. Tracy, Mr. Hillhouse, Mr. Forest, Mr. Fitzsimmons, and Mr. Foster.

In addition to Mr. Smith from South Carolina, the resolutions were opposed by Mr. Smith from Maryland, Mr. Goodhue, Mr. Lea, Mr. Dexter, Mr. Ames, Mr. Dayton, Mr. Hartley, Mr. Tracy, Mr. Hillhouse, Mr. Forest, Mr. Fitzsimmons, and Mr. Foster.

If, it was said, the United States had sustained political wrongs from Great Britain, they should feel as keenly as any persons for the prostrated honour of their country; but this was not the mode of redressing them. When that subject should be brought before congress, they would not be slow in taking such measures as the actual state of things might require. But they did not approve of retaliating injuries under the cloak of commercial regulations. Independent of other objections, it would derogate from the dignity of the American character.

If it was said that the United States had suffered political wrongs from Great Britain, they should feel just as strongly as anyone for the tarnished honor of their country; however, this wasn't the way to address those issues. When that topic came up in Congress, they wouldn't hesitate to take whatever actions the situation demanded. But they did not support responding to grievances disguised as trade regulations. Aside from other concerns, it would diminish the dignity of the American character.

The resolutions, it was said, ought to be contemplated commercially; and the influence they would probably have on the United States, deliberately weighed. If they were adopted, it ought to be because they would promote the interests of America, not because they would benefit one foreign nation, and injure another. It was an old adage that there was no friendship in trade. Neither ought there to be any hatred. These maxims should not be forgotten in forming a judgment on the propositions before the committee. Their avowed objects were to favour the navigation and the manufactures of the United States, and their probable operation on these objects ought to be considered.

The resolutions, it was said, should be considered from a business perspective; and the impact they would likely have on the United States should be carefully evaluated. If they were adopted, it should be because they would benefit American interests, not because they would help one foreign country while harming another. There’s an old saying that there is no friendship in business. There shouldn’t be any hatred either. These principles should not be overlooked when forming an opinion on the proposals before the committee. Their stated goals were to support the shipping and manufacturing industries of the United States, and the likely effects on these goals should be taken into account.

It had been said that the American tonnage ought to bear the same proportion to the foreign tonnage employed in her trade, as exists between the bulk of her exports and imports. But the correctness of this principle was not admitted. The fact was otherwise, and it was not believed to be an evil.

It was said that American shipping should match the same ratio as foreign shipping used in its trade, similar to the balance between its exports and imports. However, this principle wasn't widely accepted. The reality was different, and it wasn't seen as a problem.

Great Britain carries for other nations from necessity. Her situation is calculated for navigation. Her country is fully peopled, so full that the ground is not sufficient to furnish bread for the whole. Instead, therefore, of ploughing the earth for subsistence, her subjects are obliged to plough the ocean. The defence of their coasts has been another cause which obliges them to abandon the more lucrative pursuits of agriculture, to provide for their defence. They have been compelled to sacrifice profit to safety.

Great Britain relies on other nations out of necessity. Its location is ideal for navigation. The country is densely populated, so much so that there's not enough land to grow enough food for everyone. As a result, instead of farming the land for survival, its people are forced to farm the sea. The need to protect their shores has also led them to give up more profitable agricultural activities to ensure their safety. They have had to prioritize safety over profit.

The United States possessed a fertile, extensive, and unsettled country; and it might well be questioned how far their real interests would be promoted by forcing a further acceleration of the growth of their marine, by impelling their citizens from the cultivation of the soil to the navigation of the ocean. The measures already adopted had been very operative; and it was by no means certain that an additional stimulus would be advantageous. The increased duty on foreign tonnage, and on goods imported in foreign bottoms, had already been attended with sensible effects. In 1790, the American tonnage was one-half the whole tonnage employed in their trade: in 1791, it was three-fifths: in 1792, it had increased to two-thirds. This growth was believed to be sufficiently rapid. It was more rapid than the growth of British tonnage had ever been under the fostering care of their celebrated navigation act. Let the existing system be left to its natural operation, and it was believed that it would give to the United States that share in the carriage of their commodities, which it was their interest to take.

The United States had a rich, vast, and undeveloped land; and it was worth questioning whether pushing for faster growth of their shipping industry, by steering their citizens away from farming and toward sailing the ocean, would really benefit them. The current measures had been very effective; it wasn’t guaranteed that any extra efforts would be helpful. The increased tax on foreign ships and on goods brought in foreign vessels had already shown noticeable results. In 1790, American shipping made up half of all the tonnage used in their trade: in 1791, it was three-fifths; by 1792, it had climbed to two-thirds. This growth was considered quite fast. In fact, it outpaced the growth of British shipping at any time under the support of their famous navigation law. If the current system was allowed to function naturally, it was believed that the United States would gain the share of transporting their goods that was in their best interest.

But if a different opinion prevailed, and it was conceived that additional encouragement ought to be given to navigation, then let the duty on all foreign bottoms be increased, and let the particular disabilities to which American vessels are subjected in any country, be precisely retaliated. The discriminations proposed, instead of increasing American navigation, were calculated to encourage the navigation of one foreign nation at the expense of another.

But if a different view took hold, and it was believed that more support should be given to navigation, then let the tax on all foreign ships be raised, and let the specific disadvantages faced by American vessels in any country be directly countered. The proposed differences, instead of boosting American navigation, would have been designed to promote the navigation of one foreign nation at the cost of another.

The United States did not yet possess shipping sufficient for the exportation of their produce. The residue must reach a market in foreign bottoms, or rot upon their hands. They were advancing to a different state of things; but, in the mean time, they ought to pursue their interest, and employ those vessels which would best answer their purpose. The attempt to make it their interest to employ the vessels of France rather than those of Britain, by discriminating duties which must enhance the price of freight, was a premium to the vessels of the favourite nation, paid by American agriculture.

The United States didn’t have enough shipping to export their goods. The leftovers had to be sold on foreign ships or would go to waste. They were moving towards a different situation, but in the meantime, they should focus on their interests and use the vessels that would work best for them. Trying to make it more beneficial to use French vessels instead of British ones by imposing duties that would raise freight costs was essentially a subsidy for the ships of the favored nation, funded by American farmers.

The navigation act of Great Britain had been made a subject of heavy complaint. But that act was not particularly directed against the United States. It had been brought into operation while they were yet colonies, and was not more unfavourable to them than to others. To its regulations, Great Britain was strongly attached; and it was not probable that America could compel her to relinquish them. Calculations were made on the proportion of British manufactures consumed in America, from which it was inferred that her trade, though important, was not sufficiently important to force that nation to abandon a system which she considered as the basis of her grandeur. In the contest, considerable injury would be unquestionably sustained; and nothing was perceived in the situation of the United States, which should induce them to stand forth the champions of the whole commercial world, in order to compel the change of a system, in which all other nations had acquiesced. But if they were to engage in such a contest, it was by a similar act, by opposing disabilities to disabilities, that it ought to be carried on. Upon this point, several members who were opposed to the resolutions, avowed an opinion favourable to an American navigation act, and expressed their willingness to concur in framing regulations which meet the prohibitions imposed on their vessels with corresponding prohibitions. Thus far they were ready to go; but they were not ready to engage in a contest injurious to themselves, for the benefit of a foreign nation.

The navigation act of Great Britain had sparked a lot of complaints. However, that act wasn’t specifically aimed at the United States. It was enacted when they were still colonies and was no more detrimental to them than to others. Great Britain was very attached to its regulations and it was unlikely that America could force them to give it up. There were calculations about the amount of British goods consumed in America, leading to the conclusion that while American trade was significant, it wasn’t crucial enough to make Britain abandon a system it viewed as fundamental to its strength. In this conflict, there would undoubtedly be considerable damage, and there was nothing in the United States' position that suggested they should take on the role of defenders of the global trade community to demand a change in a system that all other nations had accepted. But if they were to enter such a conflict, it would need to be through similar actions, countering restrictions with restrictions. On this issue, several members who opposed the resolutions expressed support for an American navigation act and showed their willingness to help create regulations that would impose similar restrictions on foreign vessels. They were prepared to go this far, but they were not willing to engage in a harmful conflict for the benefit of another nation.

Another avowed object of the resolutions was to favour the manufactures of the United States. But certainly it was not by discriminating duties, by endeavouring to shift commerce from one channel to another, that American manufactures were to be promoted. This was to be done by pursuing the course already adopted, by laying protecting duties on selected articles, in the manufacture of which America had made some progress; and by a prohibitory duty on others, of which a sufficient domestic supply could be afforded. But the proposed measure only went to the imposition of a tax on their own citizens, for the benefit of a foreign nation.

Another stated goal of the resolutions was to support the manufacturing sector in the United States. However, it certainly wasn't by imposing unfair taxes or trying to redirect trade that American manufacturing would thrive. This was meant to be achieved by continuing the existing approach of implementing protective tariffs on certain products where America had made some strides, and by placing a ban on imports of goods that could be sufficiently produced domestically. But the proposed measure would only serve to impose a tax on American citizens for the benefit of a foreign country.

If the British market afforded an assortment of goods best suited to their consumption, and could give them cheaper, a prohibitory duty imposed upon those goods would only drive their citizens to seek them in another market, less able to supply their wants, and at a dearer rate. There was nothing in this tending to encourage manufactures.

If the British market offered a variety of goods that were better suited to their needs and at a lower price, then imposing a heavy tax on those goods would just push their citizens to look for them in another market that couldn’t meet their needs as well and would charge more. There was nothing in this that would encourage manufacturing.

If the United States were prepared to manufacture to the whole amount of their wants, the importation of all rival articles might be prohibited. But this they were not prepared to do. Their manufactures must advance by slow degrees; and they were not to enter into a measure of this kind, for the purpose of retaliating on a nation which had not commercially injured them.

If the United States were ready to produce everything they needed, they could ban the import of all competing products. But they weren't ready to do that. Their manufacturing would need to grow gradually, and they wouldn't take such a step just to get back at a country that hadn't harmed them economically.

The resolutions then were adapted to the encouragement neither of the navigation, nor the manufactures of the United States, but of a foreign nation. Their effect would obviously be to force trade to change its natural course, by discriminations against a nation which had in no instance discriminated against the United States, but had favoured them in many points of real importance. By what commercial considerations could such a system be recommended?

The resolutions were designed to support neither the shipping nor the industries of the United States, but rather those of a foreign country. Clearly, their effect would be to disrupt the natural flow of trade by imposing biases against a nation that had never discriminated against the United States and had, in fact, favored them on several significant issues. What commercial reasoning could possibly justify such a system?

That it would be attended with great immediate inconveniences must be admitted; but for these, ample compensation, it had been said, was to be found in its remote advantages. These were, a diminution of American commerce with one nation, by its proportional augmentation with another; and a repeal of the navigation act, and of the colonial system of Great Britain.

It’s true that there would be significant immediate drawbacks; however, as it was argued, these would be offset by its long-term benefits. These included a reduction in American trade with one country, balanced by an increase in trade with another, along with the repeal of the navigation act and the colonial system of Great Britain.

On the subject of forcing trade from one nation to another, which is, of necessity, so complicated in principle, so various and invisible in consequence, the legislature should never act but with the utmost caution. They should constantly keep in view, that trade will seek its own markets, find its own level, and regulate itself much better than it could be regulated by law. Although the government might embarrass it, and injure their own citizens, and even foreign nations, for a while, it would eventually rise above all the regulations they could make. Merchants, if left to themselves, would always find the best markets. They would buy as cheap and sell as dear as possible. Why drive them from those markets into others which were less advantageous? If trade with Britain was less free, or less profitable, than with France, the employment of coercive means to force it into French channels would be unnecessary. It would voluntarily run in them. That violence must be used in order to change its course, demonstrated that it was in its natural course.

When it comes to forcing trade from one country to another, which is obviously really complicated in theory and has many unseen consequences, lawmakers should always proceed with extreme caution. They need to remember that trade will naturally seek out its own markets, find its balance, and regulate itself much better than any laws could manage. While the government might interfere and cause harm to its own citizens and even foreign nations for a time, trade would eventually overcome any regulations imposed. Merchants, if allowed to operate freely, would always find the best markets. They would aim to buy low and sell high. So why push them away from profitable markets into less favorable ones? If trading with Britain is less free or less profitable than trading with France, there would be no need to use coercive methods to push it toward French markets; it would naturally flow there on its own. The need for force to change its direction shows that it was following its natural path.

It was extraordinary to hear gentlemen complaining of British restrictions on American commerce, and at the same time stating her proportion of that commerce as a national grievance, and that the trade was so free as to become an injury. The very circumstance that she retained so large a share of it, was evidence that it did not experience in her ports unusual burdens. Whenever greater advantages were offered by other countries, there would be no need of legislative interference to induce the merchants to embrace them. That portion of trade would go to each country, for which the circumstances of each were calculated. If Great Britain purchased more American produce than she consumed, it was because, all circumstances considered, it was the interest of America to sell her more than she consumed. While this interest continued, no mischief could result from the fact; when the cause should cease, the effect would cease also, without the intervention of the legislature.

It was remarkable to hear men complaining about British restrictions on American trade while simultaneously citing the share of that trade as a national grievance, claiming it was so free that it became a problem. The fact that Britain kept such a large portion of that trade was proof that her ports didn't impose unusual burdens. Whenever other countries offered better advantages, there would be no need for laws to convince merchants to take them up. That part of trade would naturally go to each country, based on their individual circumstances. If Great Britain bought more American goods than she used, it was because, all things considered, it was in America’s best interest to sell her more than she needed. As long as that interest existed, there would be no harm from the situation; when the cause ended, the effect would naturally stop too, without needing government intervention.

It was very improbable that the resolutions under consideration would effect their other avowed object, a repeal of the British navigation act.

It was highly unlikely that the resolutions being discussed would achieve their other stated goal, which was to repeal the British navigation act.

The season, it was said, was peculiarly unfavourable to such experiments. The internal convulsions of France had laid her manufactures in ruins. She was not in a condition to supply her own wants, much less those of the United States. The superb column erected at Lyons could furnish no stimulus to the industry of her manufacturers.

The season, it was said, was particularly unfavorable for such experiments. The internal turmoil in France had devastated her manufacturing industries. She was not in a position to meet her own needs, let alone those of the United States. The impressive column built in Lyons provided no boost to the work of her manufacturers.

But the attempt to stop the natural intercourse between the United States and Great Britain, though incapable of producing on the latter the full effect which was desired, might inflict deep and lasting wounds on the most essential interests of the former. The injuries which their agriculture would sustain from the measure, might be long and severely felt.

But trying to disrupt the natural relationship between the United States and Great Britain, although it may not fully achieve the desired outcome for the latter, could still cause significant and lasting harm to the core interests of the former. The damage to their agriculture from this action could be deeply and enduringly felt.

It had been proudly stated, that while America received articles which might be dispensed with, she furnished in return the absolute necessaries of life; she furnished bread, and raw materials for manufactures. "One would think," said Mr. Tracy, "to hear the declarations in this house, that all men were fed at the opening of our hand; and, if we shut that hand, the nations starve, and if we but shake the fist after it is shut, they die." And yet one great objection to the conduct of Britain was, her prohibitory duty on the importation of bread stuff while it was under a certain price.

It had been proudly stated that while America received goods that could easily be replaced, she provided in return the essential needs of life; she supplied bread and raw materials for manufacturing. "You would think," said Mr. Tracy, "listening to the claims made in this house, that everyone was fed solely from our generosity, and if we cut off that support, the nations would starve, and if we merely shook our fist after closing our hand, they would perish." Yet, one major criticism of Britain was her ban on importing grain when the price fell below a certain threshold.

Nothing could be more deceptive than the argument founded on the nature of American exports. What, it was asked, would be done with the surplus produce of the United States? Was it to remain in the country, and rot upon the hands of those who raised it? If not, if it was to be exported, it would find its way to the place of demand. Food would search out those who needed it; and the raw material would be carried to the manufacturer whose labour could give it value.

Nothing could be more misleading than the argument based on the nature of American exports. People asked, what would happen to the surplus produce of the United States? Would it just sit in the country and spoil in the hands of those who grew it? If not, and if it was meant to be exported, it would eventually reach the places where it was needed. Food would go to those who required it, and raw materials would be taken to the manufacturers who could create value from them.

But there was a much more serious aspect in which this subject ought to be placed. The products of America grew in other soils than hers. The demands for them might be supplied by other countries. Indeed, in some instances, articles usually obtained from the United States would be excluded by a fair competition with the same articles furnished by other countries. The discriminations made in their favour enabled them to obtain a preference in the British market. By withholding those which were of the growth of the United States, Great Britain would not lose the article, but America would lose the market; and a formidable rival would be raised up, who would last much longer than the resolutions under consideration. It is easy by commercial regulations to do much mischief, and difficult to retrieve losses. It is impossible to foresee all evils which may arise out of such measures; and their effects may last after the cause is removed.

But there was a much more serious aspect to this issue. The products of America could be grown in other countries. Their demand could be met by suppliers from elsewhere. In fact, in certain cases, items that are typically sourced from the United States could be replaced by fair competition with those same items provided by other nations. The advantages given to them allowed for a preference in the British market. By stopping imports from the United States, Great Britain wouldn’t lose the product, but America would lose out on the market; a strong competitor would be established, lasting much longer than the resolutions being discussed. It's easy to cause significant damage through trade regulations, and hard to recover from the losses. It's impossible to predict all the problems that may result from such actions, and their impacts may continue even after the original cause has been addressed.

The opponents of the resolutions persisted to consider the credit given by British merchants, as a solid advantage to any country which, like the United States, was defective in commercial capital; but they denied that, from that source, any political influence had arisen. "If," said Mr. Tracy, "we may argue from a great state, Virginia, to the union, this is not true; for although that state owes immense debts, her representatives come forward with great spirit to bring Great Britain to her feet. The people to the eastward do not owe the English merchants, and are very generally opposed to these regulations. These facts must convince us that the credit given by Great Britain, does not operate to produce a fear, and a dependence, which can be alarming to government."

The opponents of the resolutions continued to view the credit extended by British merchants as a significant benefit for any country, including the United States, which lacked commercial capital. However, they argued that this source of credit had not led to any political influence. "If," stated Mr. Tracy, "we can draw conclusions from a large state like Virginia to the whole union, that's not the case; because even though that state has huge debts, its representatives boldly push to bring Great Britain to its knees. The people in the east don’t owe anything to English merchants and largely oppose these regulations. These facts should convince us that the credit offered by Great Britain does not create a fear or dependency that could be concerning for the government."

"If," said Mr. Dexter, "I have a predilection for any country besides my own, that bias is in favour of France, the place of my father's sepulture. No one, more than myself, laments the spasm of patriotism which convulses that nation, and hazards the cause of freedom; but I shall not suffer the torrent of love or hatred to sweep me from my post. I am sent neither to plead the cause of France nor England, but am delegated as a guardian of the rights and interests of America."

"If," Mr. Dexter said, "I have a preference for any country besides my own, it's for France, where my father is buried. No one laments the wave of patriotism that shakes that nation and threatens the cause of freedom more than I do; but I won't let the flood of love or hate pull me away from my duty. I'm not here to advocate for France or England, but to represent and protect the rights and interests of America."

The speakers against the resolutions universally laboured to exclude from all weight in the decision on them, considerations which were foreign to the interests of the United States. "The discussion of this subject," said Mr. Tracy, "has assumed an appearance which must be surprising to a stranger, and painful in the extreme to ourselves. The supreme legislature of the United States is seriously deliberating, not upon the welfare of our own citizens, but upon the relative circumstances of two European nations; and this deliberation has not for its object, the relative benefits of their markets to us, but which form of government is best and most like our own, which people feel the greatest affection for us, and what measures we can adopt which will best humble one and exalt the other.

The speakers against the resolutions all worked to dismiss any considerations that were unrelated to the interests of the United States. "The discussion of this topic," said Mr. Tracy, "has taken on a form that must be surprising to outsiders and extremely painful for us. The highest legislative body in the United States is seriously debating, not about the well-being of our own citizens, but about the relative conditions of two European nations; and this debate isn’t focused on the comparative benefits of their markets for us, but on which type of government is better and more similar to our own, which people have the strongest feelings for us, and what actions we can take that will best diminish one and elevate the other."

"The primary motive of these resolutions, as acknowledged by their defenders, is, not the increase of our agriculture, manufactures, or navigation, but to humble Great Britain and build up France; and although it is said our manufactures and navigation may receive some advantage, it is only mentioned as a substitute in case of failure as to the great object.

"The main reason for these resolutions, as acknowledged by their supporters, is not to boost our agriculture, manufacturing, or shipping, but to weaken Great Britain and strengthen France. While it's claimed that our manufacturing and shipping might benefit somewhat, that's only brought up as an alternative if the main goal fails."

"The discussion in favour of these resolutions has breathed nothing but hostility and revenge against the English; and yet they put on the mild garb of commercial regulations. Legislatures, always cautious of attempting to force trade from its own channels and habits, should certainly be peculiarly cautious, when they do undertake such business, to set about it with temperance and coolness; but in this debate, we are told of the inexecution of a former treaty, withholding western posts, insults and dominations of a haughty people, that through the agency of Great Britain the savages are upon us on one side, and the Algerines on the other. The mind is roused by a group of evils, and then called upon to consider a statement of duties on goods imported from foreign countries. If the subject is commercial, why not treat it commercially, and attend to it with coolness? if it is a question of political hostility, or of war, a firmer tone may be adopted."

"The discussion in favor of these resolutions has shown nothing but hostility and desire for revenge against the English; yet they disguise it with the mild appearance of commercial regulations. Legislatures, always careful about trying to force trade away from its natural course and habits, should definitely be especially cautious when they do take on such matters, approaching them with moderation and calmness. But in this debate, we hear about the failure to implement a previous treaty, the withholding of western posts, insults, and the dominance of an arrogant people, suggesting that through Great Britain's influence, we're faced with threats from both the natives on one side and the Algerians on the other. The mind is stirred by a set of grievances and then asked to consider a proposal concerning duties on goods imported from other countries. If this is a commercial issue, why not handle it in a commercial way and approach it calmly? If it’s a matter of political hostility or war, then we can take a firmer stance."

On this side of the question, the conduct of Great Britain, if as hostile as it was represented to be, was spoken of with high indignation. "If," said Mr. Tracy, "these statements are founded in fact, I can not justify myself to my constituents, or my conscience, in saying the adoption of the regulations of commerce, a navigation act, or the whole parade of shutting ports, and freeing trade from its shackles, is in any degree calculated to meet or remedy the evil.

On this side of the issue, Great Britain's actions, if they were as aggressive as claimed, were met with strong outrage. "If," said Mr. Tracy, "these claims are true, I cannot justify to my constituents or my conscience that adopting trade regulations, a navigation act, or all the show of closing ports and loosening trade restrictions does anything to address or fix the problem.

"Although I deprecate war as the worst of calamities for my country, yet I would inquire seriously whether we had on our part, fulfilled the treaty with Great Britain, and would do complete justice to them first. I would negotiate as long and as far as patience ought to go; and, if I found an obstinate denial of justice, I would then lay the hand of force upon the western posts, and would teach the world that the United States were no less prompt in commanding justice to be done them, than they had been patient and industrious in attempting to obtain it by fair and peaceable means. In this view of the subject I should be led to say, away with your milk and water regulations; they are too trifling to effect objects of such importance. Are the Algerines to be frightened with paper resolves, or the Indians to be subdued, or the western posts taken, by commercial regulations? when we consider the subject merely as a commercial one, it goes too far, and attempts too much; but when considered as a war establishment, it falls infinitely short of the mark, and does too little."

"Even though I see war as the worst disaster for my country, I want to seriously consider whether we have fulfilled our treaty with Great Britain and whether we've done them complete justice first. I would negotiate as long as patience allows; if I encountered a stubborn refusal for justice, I would then take forceful action at the western posts, proving to the world that the United States is just as quick to demand justice as it has been patient and diligent in striving for it through fair and peaceful means. From this perspective, I would say, let's get rid of these weak regulations; they are too insignificant for issues of such importance. Are we really going to scare the Algerians with paper resolutions, or control the Indians, or capture the western posts with commercial regulations? When we treat this issue merely as a commercial one, it tries to do too much; but when we look at it as a military matter, it falls far short and does far too little."

This earnest and interesting debate was protracted to a great length, and was conducted on both sides with great spirit and eloquence. At length, on the third of February, the question was taken on the first resolution, which was carried by a majority of five. The further consideration of the resolutions was then postponed until the first Monday in March.

This serious and engaging debate went on for a long time, and both sides argued with a lot of energy and skill. Finally, on February 3rd, they voted on the first resolution, which passed by a margin of five. The discussion of the remaining resolutions was then postponed until the first Monday in March.

This animated debate was succeeded by another, on a question which also brought into full view, the systems that were embraced by the opposite parties, on some of those great national subjects which give a character to an administration.

This lively debate was followed by another, on a question that also highlighted the approaches taken by the opposing sides on key national issues that define an administration.

On the second of January, a resolution was agreed to in the house of representatives declaring "that a naval force adequate to the protection of the commerce of the United States against the Algerine corsairs, ought to be provided." The force proposed was to consist of six frigates; four of forty-four, and two of thirty-six guns.

On January 2nd, the House of Representatives agreed on a resolution stating that "a naval force sufficient to protect the commerce of the United States from the Algerian pirates should be established." The proposed force would consist of six frigates: four with forty-four guns and two with thirty-six guns.

This measure was founded on the communications of the President, representing the improbability of being able to negotiate a peace with the dey of Algiers; and on undoubted information that the corsairs of that regency had, during their first short cruise in the Atlantic, captured eleven American merchantmen, and made upwards of one hundred prisoners; and were preparing to renew their attack on the unprotected vessels of the United States.

This decision was based on communications from the President, which showed that negotiating peace with the dey of Algiers was unlikely; and on reliable information that the corsairs from that region had, during their initial brief cruise in the Atlantic, captured eleven American merchant ships and taken more than one hundred prisoners; and were getting ready to continue their attacks on the unprotected ships of the United States.

In every stage of its progress this bill was most strenuously opposed.

At every stage of its progress, this bill faced strong opposition.

Debates on the subject of a navy.

The measure was viewed simply as a present protection to commerce, and then as the commencement of a permanent naval establishment. In both characters it was reprobated with extreme severity.

The measure was seen merely as a temporary safeguard for trade, and then as the beginning of a lasting naval force. In both respects, it was condemned with intense harshness.

As a measure of protection, it was declared to be altogether incompetent to the attainment of its object, because the force contemplated was insufficient, and because it could not be brought into immediate use. The measure, therefore, would be totally inefficacious.

As a protective measure, it was deemed completely inadequate for achieving its purpose, because the planned force was insufficient and could not be immediately deployed. Therefore, the measure would be completely ineffective.

But the object might be effected by other means, more eligible, and less expensive. By proper management, and a due attention to time and circumstances, a peace might be procured with money.

But the goal could be achieved by other means that are more suitable and less costly. With proper management and careful consideration of timing and circumstances, peace could be secured with money.

Nations possessing a naval force greatly superior to the proposed armament, had found it to their advantage to purchase the friendship of the Algerines. That mode of procuring peace was recommended both by its efficacy, and its economy. Unless the object was obtained, the money would not be expended.

Nations with a naval power much greater than the suggested armament found it beneficial to buy the friendship of the Algerians. This way of securing peace was suggested because it was both effective and cost-efficient. If the goal wasn't achieved, the money wouldn't be spent.

Another mode of giving security to their commerce, preferable to the plan in the bill, was to purchase the protection of foreign powers. This might be acquired at a less expense than would be incurred in fitting out the proposed armament, and its utility would be immediate.

Another way to secure their trade, better than what was proposed in the bill, was to seek the protection of foreign powers. This could be obtained at a lower cost than equipping the suggested military force, and it would provide immediate benefits.

But the measure was also to be considered as the commencement of a permanent navy. The question which this view of it presented, was one of the most important that could engage the consideration of the house. The adoption of the principle would involve a complete dereliction of the policy of discharging the public debt. History afforded no instance of a nation which continued to increase its navy, and at the same time to decrease its debt.

But this decision was also seen as the start of a permanent navy. The issue this raised was one of the most important topics the house could discuss. Embracing this principle would mean completely abandoning the policy of reducing the public debt. History showed no example of a nation that kept expanding its navy while also decreasing its debt.

To the expensiveness of the navy system were ascribed the oppression under which the people of England groaned, the overthrow of the French monarchy, and the dangers which threatened that of Great Britain. The expensiveness of the government was the true ground of the oppression of the people. The king, the nobility, the priesthood, the army, and above all, the navy. All this machinery lessens the number of productive, and increases the number of unproductive hands in the nation.

To the high costs of the navy system were blamed the hardships that the people of England suffered, the fall of the French monarchy, and the threats facing the British monarchy. The high costs of the government were the real reason for the oppression of the people. The king, the nobility, the clergy, the army, and especially the navy. All this machinery reduces the number of productive people and increases the number of unproductive ones in the nation.

The United States had already advanced full far enough in this system. In addition to the civil list, they had funded a debt on the principles of duration, had raised an army at an immense expense, and now a proposition was made for a navy.

The United States had already made significant progress in this system. Along with the civil list, they had financed a long-term debt, had built an army at a huge cost, and now a proposal was brought forward for a navy.

The system of governing by debts, was the most refined system of tyranny. It seemed to be a contrivance devised by politicians to succeed the old system of feudal tenures. Both were tyrannical, but the objects of their tyranny were different. The one operated on the person, the other operates on the pockets of the individual. The feudal lord was satisfied with the acknowledgment of the tenant that he was a slave, and the rendition of a pepper corn as an evidence of it; the product of his labour was left for his own support. The system of debts affords no such indulgence. Its true policy is to devise objects of expense, and to draw the greatest possible sum from the people in the least visible mode. No device can facilitate the system of debts and expense so much as a navy; and they should hold the liberty of the American people at a lower rate, should this policy be adopted.

The system of governing through debt was the most sophisticated form of oppression. It seemed like a setup created by politicians to replace the old feudal system. Both were oppressive, but their targets were different. One controlled people directly, while the other targeted individuals' finances. The feudal lord was content with the tenant acknowledging their subservience and giving a small token as proof; the tenant could keep the fruits of their labor for their own survival. The debt system offers no such leniency. Its real goal is to create expenses and extract as much money from people in the least obvious way possible. Nothing facilitates the debt and expense system more than a navy; they would value the freedom of the American people even less if this strategy were implemented.

Another great objection to the establishment of a navy was, that until the United States should be able to contend with the great maritime powers on the ocean, it would be a hostage, to its full value, for their good behaviour. It would increase rather than lessen their dependence.

Another major objection to setting up a navy was that until the United States could compete with the major maritime powers on the ocean, it would be a liability, fully dependent on their good behavior. It would create more dependence rather than reduce it.

In reply, it was said that if it had been the intention of the house to incur a vast expense in the establishment of a navy for vain parade, there might be force in some of the objections which had been made. But this was not the case. It was a measure, not of choice, but of necessity. It was extorted by the pressure of unavoidable events.

In response, it was noted that if the house had intended to spend a huge amount on a navy just for show, some of the complaints might have had merit. However, that wasn't the situation. This was a decision born out of necessity, not preference. It was driven by the pressure of unavoidable circumstances.

It being universally admitted that their commerce required protection against the Algerine corsairs, the question was, simply, whether the plan proposed in the bill was the best mode of affording that protection.

It is widely accepted that their trade needed protection from the Algerine pirates, so the main question was whether the approach suggested in the bill was the best way to provide that protection.

To decide this question, it would be proper to consider the substitutes which had been offered; and then to review the objections which had been made to the measure.

To address this question, it would be appropriate to look at the alternatives that had been proposed; and then to examine the objections that had been raised against the measure.

The substitutes were, first, to purchase a peace; and secondly, to subsidize other nations to protect commerce.

The alternatives were, first, to buy peace; and second, to pay other countries to safeguard trade.

On the first substitute, it was said that the late communications must satisfy every person who had attended to them, that all hope of purchasing a peace must be abandoned, unless there was a manifestation of some force which might give effect to negotiation. So long as the vessels of the United States remained an easy and tempting prey to the cupidity of those corsairs, it would be vain to expect that they would sell a peace for the price the government would be willing to give, or that a peace would be of any duration. If the executive had experienced such difficulties while the Algerine cruisers had captured only one or two vessels, and were confined to the Mediterranean by a Portuguese squadron, how much less prospect was there of success after they had captured a considerable number of ships, were likely to capture many more, and were at liberty to cruise on the Atlantic to the very coasts of the United States? Even that little prospect of success would be diminished, when the dey of Algiers should understand that the United States would take no measures to protect their trade, and were afraid of the expense of a small armament.

On the first substitute, it was stated that the recent communications must satisfy everyone who paid attention to them, and that any hope of buying peace must be abandoned unless there was a show of force that could support negotiations. As long as United States vessels remained easy and tempting targets for those pirates, it would be pointless to expect them to accept a peace agreement for the amount the government was willing to offer, or that any peace would last. If the administration faced such challenges while the Algerine cruisers had only captured one or two vessels and were limited to the Mediterranean by a Portuguese fleet, how much less chance of success would there be now that they had captured a significant number of ships, were likely to seize many more, and were free to cruise the Atlantic right up to the shores of the United States? Even that slim chance of success would shrink if the dey of Algiers realized that the United States wouldn’t take steps to protect their trade and was wary of the cost of a small military presence.

It was to be understood that they did not rely solely on the operations of the armament. They still looked forward to negotiation, and were willing to provide the means for purchasing a peace. But the former measure was necessary to give success to the latter, and the armament might be employed to advantage should negotiation fail.

It was clear that they didn’t depend only on the military action. They still hoped for a negotiation and were ready to offer resources to buy peace. However, the first approach was needed to support the second, and the military could be used effectively if the negotiation fell through.

The other substitute was to subsidize foreign powers. The national dishonour of depending upon others for that protection which the United States were able to afford themselves, was strongly urged. But there were additional objections to this project. Either the nations in contemplation were at peace or at war with the regency of Algiers. If the former, it was not to be expected that they would relinquish that peace for any indemnification the United States could make them. If the latter, they had sufficient inducements to check the depredations of their enemies without subsidies. Such a protection would be hazardous, as it would be, at any time, in the power of the nation that should be employed, to conclude a truce with Algiers, and leave the trade of the United States at the mercy of her corsairs. While the expense of protection was perpetually to be incurred, it would never furnish the strength which that expense ought to give.

The other option was to support foreign powers. The national shame of relying on others for the protection that the United States could provide for itself was strongly pointed out. But there were more objections to this idea. The nations being considered were either at peace or at war with the regency of Algiers. If they were at peace, it was unlikely they would give up that peace for any compensation the United States could offer. If they were at war, they had enough reasons to deal with their enemies' attacks without needing financial support. That kind of protection would be risky, since any nation involved could choose to negotiate a truce with Algiers and leave U.S. trade vulnerable to their pirates. While the cost of protection would always be a factor, it would never provide the strength that the expense should bring.

With a navy of her own, America might co-operate to advantage with any power at war with Algiers, but it would be risking too much to depend altogether on any foreign nation.

With its own navy, America could work together beneficially with any country at war with Algiers, but it would be taking too big a risk to rely entirely on any foreign nation.

To the argument that the force was incompetent to the object, it was answered, that, from the documents before them, and from the diligent inquiries of a large committee, the number and strength of the Algerine corsairs had been ascertained, and the armament contemplated in the bill was believed to be sufficient. If gentlemen thought differently, it was surprising that they did not move to augment it.

To the claim that the force was inadequate for the task, it was replied that, based on the documents available and the thorough investigations of a large committee, the number and strength of the Algerian corsairs had been determined, and the armament proposed in the bill was considered sufficient. If anyone disagreed, it was surprising that they didn’t suggest an increase.

The expense of the frigates had been strongly urged. But the saving in insurance, in ships and cargoes, and in the ransom of seamen, was more than equivalent to this item. "But are not the slavery of our fellow citizens, and the national disgrace resulting from it, to be taken into the account? these are considerations beyond all calculation. Who can, after reading the affecting narratives of the unfortunate, sit down contented with cold calculations and syllogisms? their narratives ought to excite every possible exertion, not only to procure the release of the captured, but to prevent the increase of the number of these unhappy victims."

The cost of the frigates had been heavily emphasized. However, the savings from insurance, ships and cargoes, and the ransom of sailors exceeded this expense. "But shouldn’t we also consider the slavery of our fellow citizens and the national disgrace that comes with it? These are issues that go beyond any calculations. Who can read the heartbreaking stories of the unfortunate and remain satisfied with just cold calculations and logic? Their stories should inspire every possible effort, not only to secure the freedom of those who are captured but also to prevent the rise in the number of these unfortunate victims."

That a bill providing six frigates, to exist during the war with the Algerines, should excite apprehensions of a large permanent navy, and of an immense debt, was truly astonishing. But even if the bill had not contained a clause enabling the President to discontinue the armament provided peace should be concluded with the regency of Algiers, the weight of the objection was denied. America was peculiarly fitted for a navy; she abounded in all kinds of naval resources, and had within herself, those means which other nations were obliged to obtain from abroad. Her situation, and the dispositions of a considerable proportion of her citizens, evinced still more the propriety of a naval establishment. Perhaps the country was not yet mature for such an establishment to any great extent. But the period was not far distant when it would be. The United States had an increasing population, much individual wealth, and considerable national resources. It was not believed that the expense of equipping a small naval armament for the protection of their commerce, would be insupportable.

That a bill for six frigates to be built during the war with the Algerians would cause concerns about a large permanent navy and a massive debt was truly surprising. But even if the bill hadn't included a provision allowing the President to halt the armament if peace was reached with the regency of Algiers, the seriousness of the objection was disputed. America was particularly well-suited for a navy; it had plenty of naval resources and possessed the means that other nations had to get from abroad. Its geographical position and the attitudes of many of its citizens further highlighted the need for a naval force. Perhaps the country wasn't quite ready for a significant naval establishment yet. However, the time wasn’t far off when it would be. The United States had a growing population, substantial individual wealth, and significant national resources. It was believed that the cost of equipping a small naval force to protect their commerce wouldn't be unbearable.

It was, however, matter of surprise, that gentlemen who had deemed the improvement of American navigation, as a source of defence, an object of so much importance as to be anxious to wage an immediate commercial war with Great Britain for that purpose, should avow such a fixed determination against resorting to that resource in any degree whatever, under circumstances the most urgent.

It was surprising that gentlemen who considered improving American navigation as a crucial defense strategy and were eager to initiate an immediate trade war with Great Britain for that reason, would express such a strong resolve against using that resource in any form, even in the most urgent circumstances.

The original resolution was carried only by a majority of two voices; but as the bill advanced, several members who were accustomed to vote in the opposition gave it their support; and, on the final question, a majority of eleven appeared in its favour. The other branch of the legislature concurred, and it received the cordial assent of the President.

The original resolution passed by just a two-vote majority; however, as the bill progressed, several members who usually voted against it started supporting it. In the end, a majority of eleven voted in favor. The other part of the legislature agreed, and it received enthusiastic approval from the President.

Pending these discussions, the irritations in which they commenced were greatly aggravated by accounts, that captures of American vessels by British cruisers were made to an extent altogether unprecedented; and early in March, an authentic paper was received which proved that those captures were not unauthorized.

Pending these discussions, the frustrations that started them were significantly worsened by reports that British cruisers were capturing American ships like never before; and early in March, a reliable document was received showing that these captures were indeed authorized.

On the sixth of November, 1793, additional instructions had been issued to the ships of war and privateers of Great Britain, requiring them to stop and detain all ships, laden with goods the produce of any colony belonging to France, or carrying provisions or other supplies to any such colony, and to bring the same, with their cargoes, to legal adjudication, in the British courts of admiralty.

On November 6, 1793, new orders were given to the warships and privateers of Great Britain, instructing them to stop and seize all ships carrying goods from any French colony or transporting supplies to those colonies, and to bring those ships and their cargoes to British admiralty courts for legal judgment.

These instructions made a serious impression on the most reflecting and moderate men in the United States. It was believed that they originated in a spirit of hostility which must lead to war; and that it had now become the part of prudence to prepare for that event.

These instructions had a significant impact on the most thoughtful and reasonable people in the United States. They believed these directives came from a place of hostility that would inevitably lead to war, and that it was now wise to get ready for that possibility.

On the 12th of March, Mr. Sedgewick moved several resolutions, the objects of which were to raise a military force, and to authorize the President to lay an embargo. The armament was to consist of fifteen thousand men, who should be brought into actual service in case of war with any European power, but not until war should break out. In the mean time, they were to receive pay while assembled for the purpose of discipline, which was not to exceed twenty-four days in each year.

On March 12th, Mr. Sedgewick proposed several resolutions aimed at raising a military force and giving the President the authority to impose an embargo. The plan was to have fifteen thousand men ready to serve in case of war with any European country, but they wouldn't be called into action until war actually started. In the meantime, they would receive pay while gathered for training, which would not exceed twenty-four days each year.

After stating the motives which led to the introduction of these resolutions, they were laid on the table for the consideration of the members. Two days afterwards, a motion was made to take up that which related to an embargo; but this motion was negatived for the purpose of resuming the consideration of the commercial regulations which had been offered by Mr. Madison. On the motion of Mr. Nicholas, those resolutions were amended so as to subject the manufactures of Great Britain alone, instead of those of all nations having no commercial treaties with the United States, to the proposed augmentation of duties. They were again debated with great earnestness, but no decision on them was made.

After explaining the reasons for introducing these resolutions, they were presented for the members to consider. Two days later, a motion was made to discuss the one regarding an embargo; however, this motion was rejected so that they could focus on the commercial regulations proposed by Mr. Madison. At Mr. Nicholas's suggestion, those resolutions were changed to target only the manufactures of Great Britain, rather than those from all nations without commercial treaties with the United States, for the proposed duty increases. They were debated again with considerable seriousness, but no decision was reached.

In addition to the objections urged against them as forming a commercial system in time of peace, they were said to be particularly inapplicable to the present moment. If, as was believed, the United States were about to be forced into a war, the public counsels ought to be directed to measures of defence. In that event, the resolutions would, at best, be useless. But the greater the danger of war, the more incumbent was it on the government to unite public opinion in support of it; and this would best be effected by observing a line of conduct which would furnish no just cause of hostility. The commercial discriminations proposed were of a hostile and irritating nature, might render war certain, would be considered by many as unnecessary, and might impair that unanimity in which the great strength of the country consisted. It was submitted to the gentlemen to decide whether it was wise to press their system through, with so small a majority as was in its favour.

In addition to the objections raised against them for creating a commercial system during peacetime, it was argued that they were especially unsuitable for the current situation. If, as believed, the United States was about to be drawn into a war, public discussion should focus on defense measures. In that case, the resolutions would be, at best, pointless. However, the greater the threat of war, the more important it was for the government to unite public opinion in support of it; and this would be best achieved by following a course of action that provided no valid reason for hostility. The proposed commercial restrictions were seen as hostile and provocative, could make war inevitable, would be viewed by many as unnecessary, and could weaken the unity that was the country's greatest strength. It was left to the gentlemen to decide whether it was wise to push their system through with such a narrow majority in favor.

The resolutions were defended on the principle, that though not in themselves contributing to the national defence, they would not prevent the adoption of such other measures as the state of things might render necessary. If war should take place, they could do no harm. But war must at some time be succeeded by peace: and they would form a valuable basis for negotiation.[15]

The resolutions were justified on the basis that while they might not directly help with national defense, they wouldn’t block the implementation of other actions that might be needed given the situation. If war occurred, they wouldn’t cause any damage. However, war will eventually give way to peace, and these resolutions would provide a solid foundation for negotiations.[15]

An embargo law.

On the 21st of March, Mr. Sedgewick's motion authorizing the President to lay an embargo was negatived by a majority of two voices; but in a few days, the consideration of that subject was resumed, and a resolution passed, prohibiting all trade from the United States to any foreign port or place for the space of thirty days, and empowering the President to carry the resolution into effect.

On March 21st, Mr. Sedgewick's proposal to allow the President to impose an embargo was rejected by a margin of two votes; however, a few days later, the topic was taken up again, and a resolution was passed that banned all trade from the United States to any foreign port or location for thirty days, giving the President the authority to implement the resolution.

This resolution was accompanied with vigorous provisional measures for defence, respecting the adoption of which, no considerable division of sentiment was avowed.

This resolution was accompanied by strong temporary measures for defense, and there was no significant disagreement on adopting them.

While the measures of congress indicated that expectation of war, a public document made its appearance which seemed to demonstrate that Great Britain also was preparing for that event. This was the answer of Lord Dorchester, on the 10th of February, to a speech delivered by the deputies of a great number of Indian tribes assembled at Quebec. In this answer, his lordship had openly avowed the opinion, founded, as he said, on the conduct of the American people, that a war between Great Britain and the United States, during the present year, was probable, and that a new line between the two nations must then be drawn by the sword.

While Congress's actions suggested an expectation of war, a public document surfaced that seemed to show that Great Britain was also preparing for it. This was Lord Dorchester's response on February 10th to a speech given by representatives of numerous Indian tribes gathered in Quebec. In this response, his lordship openly stated his belief—based, as he claimed, on the behavior of the American people—that a war between Great Britain and the United States was likely to happen this year, and that a new boundary between the two nations would need to be established through conflict.

This document was not authentic; but it obtained general belief, and contributed to confirm the opinion that war was scarcely to be avoided.

This document wasn't genuine; however, it gained widespread acceptance and helped solidify the belief that war was nearly inevitable.

On the 27th of March, Mr. Dayton moved a resolution for sequestering all debts due to British subjects, and for taking means to secure their payment into the treasury, as a fund out of which to indemnify the citizens of the United States for depredations committed on their commerce by British cruisers, in violation of the laws of nations.

On March 27th, Mr. Dayton proposed a resolution to freeze all debts owed to British citizens and to take steps to ensure their payment into the treasury, creating a fund to compensate U.S. citizens for damages to their trade caused by British ships, which violated international law.

The debate on this resolution was such as was to be expected from the irritable state of the public mind. The invectives against the British nation were uttered with peculiar vehemence, and were mingled with allusions to the exertions of the government for the preservation of neutrality, censuring strongly the system which had been pursued.

The discussion about this resolution was exactly what you would expect given how worked up the public was. The criticisms of the British nation were expressed with intense passion and mixed with comments about the government's efforts to maintain neutrality, strongly condemning the approach that had been taken.

Before any question was taken on the proposition for sequestering British debts, and without a decision on those proposed by Mr. Madison, Mr. Clarke moved a resolution, which in some degree suspended the commercial regulations that had been so earnestly debated. This was to prohibit all intercourse with Great Britain until her government should make full compensation for all injuries done to the citizens of the United States by armed vessels, or by any person or persons acting under the authority of the British king; and until the western posts should be delivered up.[16]

Before any questions were raised about the proposal to sequester British debts, and without a decision on those suggested by Mr. Madison, Mr. Clarke proposed a resolution that somewhat suspended the commercial regulations that had been intensely discussed. This was to ban all trade with Great Britain until its government provided full compensation for all damages caused to the citizens of the United States by armed vessels or anyone acting under the authority of the British king; and until the western posts were surrendered.[16]

On the fourth of April, before any decision was made on the several propositions which have been stated, the President laid before congress a letter just received from Mr. Pinckney, the minister of the United States at London, communicating additional instructions to the commanders of British armed ships, which were dated the eighth of January. These instructions revoked those of the sixth of November; and, instead of bringing in for adjudication all neutral vessels trading with the French islands, British cruisers were directed to bring in those only which were laden with cargoes the produce of the French islands, and were on a direct voyage from those islands to Europe.

On April 4th, before any decisions were made on the various proposals presented, the President shared a letter he had just received from Mr. Pinckney, the U.S. minister in London. This letter included new instructions for the commanders of British armed ships, dated January 8th. These instructions revoked the ones from November 6th; instead of capturing all neutral vessels trading with the French islands, British cruisers were now instructed to only seize those that were carrying cargoes made from the produce of the French islands and were on a direct route from those islands to Europe.

The letter detailed a conversation with Lord Grenville on this subject, in which his lordship explained the motives which had originally occasioned the order of the sixth of November, and gave to it a less extensive signification than it had received in the courts of vice admiralty.

The letter outlined a conversation with Lord Grenville on this topic, where he explained the reasons behind the order from November 6, giving it a narrower interpretation than it had been given in the vice admiralty courts.

It was intended, he said, to be temporary, and was calculated to answer two purposes. One was, to prevent the abuses which might take place in consequence of the whole of the St. Domingo fleet having gone to the United States; the other was, on account of the attack designed upon the French West India islands by the armament under Sir John Jarvis and Sir Charles Grey; but it was now no longer necessary to continue the regulations for those purposes. His lordship added, that the order of the sixth of November did not direct the confiscation of all vessels trading with the French islands, but only that they should be brought in for legal adjudication; and he conceived that no vessel would be condemned under it, which would not have been previously liable to the same sentence.

He said it was meant to be temporary and was designed for two reasons. One was to stop any abuses that might happen because the entire St. Domingo fleet had gone to the United States; the other was due to the planned attack on the French West Indies by the forces led by Sir John Jarvis and Sir Charles Grey. However, it was no longer necessary to keep the regulations for those reasons. His lordship added that the order from November 6 did not call for the confiscation of all vessels trading with the French islands, but only required that they be brought in for legal review. He believed that no vessel would be condemned under this order unless it would have faced the same judgment beforehand.

The influence of this communication on the party in the legislature which was denominated federal, was very considerable. Believing that the existing differences between the two nations still admitted of explanation and adjustment, they strenuously opposed all measures which were irritating in their tendency, or which might be construed into a dereliction of the neutral character they were desirous of maintaining; but they gave all their weight to those which, by putting the nation in a posture of defence, prepared it for war, should negotiation fail.

The impact of this communication on the group in the legislature known as federal was significant. They believed that the ongoing differences between the two nations could still be explained and resolved, so they strongly opposed any actions that might provoke tension or be seen as abandoning the neutral stance they wanted to keep. However, they supported measures that, by preparing the nation for defense, got it ready for war if negotiations broke down.

On the opposite party, no change of sentiment or of views appears to have been produced. Their system seems to have been matured, and not to have originated in the feelings of the moment. They adhered to it therefore with inflexible perseverance; but seemed not anxious to press an immediate determination of the propositions which had been made. These propositions were discussed with great animation; but, notwithstanding an ascertained majority in their favour, were permitted to remain undecided, as if their fate depended on some extrinsic circumstance.

On the other side, there doesn’t seem to have been any change in feelings or opinions. Their stance seems well thought out, not just a reaction to the moment. They stuck to it with strong determination but didn’t seem eager to make a quick decision on the proposals that were presented. These proposals were debated energetically; however, despite having a clear majority supporting them, they were left unresolved, as if their outcome relied on some outside factor.

Meanwhile, great exertions were made to increase the public agitation, and to stimulate the resentments which were felt against Great Britain. The artillery of the press was played with unceasing fury on the minority of the house of representatives; and the democratic societies brought their whole force into operation. Language will scarcely afford terms of greater outrage than were employed against those who sought to stem the torrent of public opinion, and to moderate the rage of the moment. They were denounced as a British faction, seeking to impose chains on their countrymen. Even the majority was declared to be but half roused; and to show little of that energy and decision which the crisis required.

Meanwhile, significant efforts were made to increase public unrest and fuel the anger directed at Great Britain. The press relentlessly targeted the minority in the House of Representatives, while the democratic societies mobilized their full resources. Few words exist that capture the level of outrage directed at those attempting to resist the wave of public opinion and cool the tempers of the moment. They were labeled as a British faction trying to enslave their fellow countrymen. Even the majority was said to be only partially awake and lacking the energy and decisiveness that the situation demanded.

Unequivocal evidence, it was said, had been obtained of the liberticide intentions of Great Britain; and only the successes of freedom against tyranny, the triumphs of their magnanimous French brethren over slaves, had been the means of once more guaranteeing the independence of this country. The glorious example of France ought to animate the American people to every exertion to raise their prostrate character; and every tie of gratitude and interest should lead them to cement their connexion with that great republic. The proclamation of neutrality, though admitted to have originated in the best motives on the part of the President, was declared to be not only questionable in a constitutional point of view, but eventually to have proved impolitic. Being falsely construed by Great Britain into a manifestation of a pusillanimous disposition, it served to explain the aggressions of that nation. Experience now urged the abandonment of a line of conduct, which had fed the pride and provoked the insults of their unprincipled and implacable enemy; and was derogatory to the honour, inconsistent with the interest, and hostile to the liberties of their country.

Clear evidence had been gathered about Great Britain's oppressive intentions; and only the victories of freedom over tyranny, along with the triumphs of their noble French allies against oppression, had once again secured this country's independence. The inspiring example of France should motivate the American people to make every effort to uplift their battered reputation; and every bond of gratitude and interest should encourage them to strengthen their connection with that great republic. The proclamation of neutrality, although recognized as having originated from the best intentions by the President, was seen as questionable from a constitutional standpoint and ultimately proved to be a bad choice. Misinterpreted by Great Britain as a sign of weakness, it clarified that nation’s aggressive behavior. Experience now called for the abandonment of a course of action that had fueled the pride and provoked the insults of their unscrupulous and relentless enemy; which was disrespectful to their honor, inconsistent with their interests, and detrimental to the liberties of their country.

Their tameness under British aggressions was declared to furnish just cause of offence to France; since every infringement of right submitted to by a neutral, inflicted a correspondent injury on the nation at war with the offending power.

Their submissiveness to British aggression was said to provide legitimate grounds for offense to France; because every violation of rights accepted by a neutral party caused a corresponding harm to the nation at war with the offending power.

The proceedings of the legislature continued to manifest a fixed purpose to pursue the system which had been commenced; and the public sentiment seemed to accord with that system. That the nation was advancing rapidly to a state of war, was firmly believed by many intelligent men, who doubted the necessity, and denied the policy of abandoning the neutral position which had been thus long maintained. In addition to the extensive calamities which must, in any state of things, result to the United States from a rupture with a nation which was the mistress of the ocean, and which furnished the best market for the sale of their produce, and the purchase of manufactures of indispensable necessity, there were considerations belonging exclusively to the moment, which, though operating only in a narrow circle, were certainly entitled to great respect.

The legislature's actions continued to show a clear intention to stick with the system that had already started, and public opinion seemed to support it. Many knowledgeable people firmly believed that the nation was quickly heading towards war and questioned the need to shift away from the neutral stance that had been maintained for so long. Besides the significant disasters that would definitely occur for the United States if they broke ties with a nation that dominated the oceans and provided the best market for selling their goods and buying essential manufactured items, there were also factors tied specifically to the current moment that, while impacting only a small group, clearly deserved serious consideration.

That war with Britain, during the continuance of the passionate and almost idolatrous devotion of a great majority of the people to the French republic, would throw America so completely into the arms of France as to leave her no longer mistress of her own conduct, was not the only fear which the temper of the day suggested. That the spirit which triumphed in that nation, and deluged it with the blood of its revolutionary champions, might cross the Atlantic, and desolate the hitherto safe and peaceful dwellings of the American people, was an apprehension not so entirely unsupported by appearances, as to be pronounced chimerical. With a blind infatuation, which treated reason as a criminal, immense numbers applauded a furious despotism, trampling on every right, and sporting with life, as the essence of liberty; and the few who conceived freedom to be a plant which did not flourish the better for being nourished with human blood, and who ventured to disapprove the ravages of the guillotine, were execrated as the tools of the coalesced despots, and as persons who, to weaken the affection of America for France, became the calumniators of that republic. Already had an imitative spirit, captivated with the splendour, but copying the errors of a great nation, reared up in every part of the continent self created corresponding societies, who, claiming to be the people, assumed a control over the government, and were loosening its bands. Already were the mountain,[17] and a revolutionary tribunal, favourite toasts; and already were principles familiarly proclaimed which, in France, had been the precursors of that tremendous and savage despotism, which, in the name of the people, and by the instrumentality of affiliated societies, had spread its terrific sway over that fine country, and had threatened to extirpate all that was wise and virtuous. That a great majority of those statesmen who conducted the opposition would deprecate such a result, furnished no security against it. When the physical force of a nation usurps the place of its wisdom, those who have produced such a state of things no longer control it.

That war with Britain, while a large part of the population was passionately devoted to the French republic, would completely throw America into France's embrace, leaving it unable to steer its own course. This wasn’t the only fear that people had at the time. There was also the worry that the spirit that had taken hold of France, resulting in the deaths of its revolutionary heroes, might cross the Atlantic and destroy the previously safe and peaceful homes of Americans. This concern was not completely unfounded, and could not be dismissed as unrealistic. A large number of people blindly supported a brutal dictatorship that violated every right and toyed with life, mistaking this for liberty. Meanwhile, those few who believed that freedom didn't thrive on human suffering and who dared to condemn the bloodshed of the guillotine were vilified as agents of oppressive rulers and as people who slandered the republic in an attempt to weaken America’s affection for France. An imitative spirit had already taken root across the continent, captivated by France’s grandeur but mirroring its mistakes, creating self-styled societies that claimed to represent the people while usurping control over the government and undermining its authority. Already, the mountains,[17] and revolutionary courts were being toasted as favorites, and ideas were being boldly declared that had in France preceded the rise of a horrific and savage dictatorship, which, in the name of the people and through these associated societies, had spread its terrifying rule over that beautiful country, threatening to eradicate all that was wise and virtuous. The fact that a significant majority of the statesmen leading the opposition opposed such a result did not guarantee it wouldn’t happen. When a nation's brute force replaces its wisdom, those responsible for that situation can no longer control it.

These apprehensions, whether well or ill founded, produced in those who felt them, an increased solicitude for the preservation of peace. Their aid was not requisite to confirm the judgment of the President on this interesting subject. Fixed in his purpose of maintaining the neutrality of the United States, until the aggressions of a foreign power should clearly render neutrality incompatible with honour; and conceiving, from the last advices received from England, that the differences between the two nations had not yet attained that point, he determined to make one decisive effort, which should either remove the ostensible causes of quarrel, or demonstrate the indisposition of Great Britain to remove them. This determination was executed by the nomination of an envoy extraordinary to his Britannic majesty, which was announced to the senate on the 16th of April in the following terms:

These worries, whether valid or not, led those who experienced them to be more concerned about keeping the peace. Their support wasn’t needed to confirm the President's views on this important issue. Committed to maintaining the United States' neutrality until a foreign power's actions clearly made neutrality unacceptable, and believing, based on the latest news from England, that the conflicts between the two nations hadn’t reached that point yet, he decided to make one definitive effort to either eliminate the apparent reasons for conflict or show that Great Britain was unwilling to address them. This decision was carried out by appointing an extraordinary envoy to the British king, which was communicated to the Senate on April 16th in the following terms:

"The communications which I have made to you during your present session, from the despatches of our minister in London, contain a serious aspect of our affairs with Great Britain. But as peace ought to be pursued with unremitted zeal, before the last resource which has so often been the scourge of nations, and can not fail to check the advanced prosperity of the United States, is contemplated, I have thought proper to nominate, and do hereby nominate John Jay, as envoy extraordinary of the United States, to his Britannic majesty.

"The messages I've sent you during this session, based on reports from our minister in London, highlight a serious situation in our dealings with Great Britain. However, since we should strive for peace with unwavering commitment before considering the last resort that has often brought suffering to nations and could hinder the progress of the United States, I have decided to nominate John Jay as the extraordinary envoy of the United States to His Britannic Majesty."

Mr. Jay appointed envoy extraordinary to Great Britain.

"My confidence in our minister plenipotentiary in London continues undiminished. But a mission like this, while it corresponds with the solemnity of the occasion, will announce to the world a solicitude for the friendly adjustment of our complaints, and a reluctance to hostility. Going immediately from the United States, such an envoy will carry with him a full knowledge of the existing temper and sensibility of our country; and will thus be taught to vindicate our rights with firmness, and to cultivate peace with sincerity."

"My confidence in our ambassador in London remains strong. However, a mission like this, while fitting for the seriousness of the occasion, will show the world our desire to resolve our grievances amicably and our hesitation to resort to conflict. By coming directly from the United States, such a envoy will bring with them a clear understanding of our country's current mood and sensitivities; this will help them assert our rights assertively while genuinely promoting peace."

To those who believed the interests of the nation to require a rupture with England, and a still closer connexion with France, nothing could be more unlooked for, or more unwelcome, than this decisive measure. That it would influence the proceedings of congress could not be doubted; and it would materially affect the public mind was probable. Evincing the opinion of the executive that negotiation, not legislative hostility, was still the proper medium for accommodating differences with Great Britain, it threw on the legislature a great responsibility, if they should persist in a system calculated to defeat that negotiation. By showing to the people that their President did not yet believe war to be necessary, it turned the attention of many to peace; and, by suggesting the probability, rekindled the almost extinguished desire, of preserving that blessing.

To those who thought the country's best interest required a break with England and a tighter alliance with France, nothing could have been more unexpected or unwelcome than this decisive action. There was no doubt it would influence Congress's decisions, and it was likely to have a significant impact on public opinion. By demonstrating the executive's belief that negotiation, rather than legislative opposition, was still the right way to resolve differences with Great Britain, it placed a significant responsibility on the legislature if they continued with a strategy that could undermine that negotiation. By showing the people that their President still did not see war as necessary, it redirected many toward the idea of peace and kindled the almost fading desire to maintain that blessing.

Scarcely has any public act of the President drawn upon his administration a greater degree of censure than this. That such would be its effect, could not be doubted by a person who had observed the ardour with which opinions that it thwarted were embraced, or the extremity to which the passions and contests of the moment had carried all orders of men. But it is the province of real patriotism to consult the utility, more than the popularity of a measure; and to pursue the path of duty, although it may be rugged.

Hardly any public action by the President has attracted more criticism for his administration than this. Anyone who has noticed the enthusiasm with which opposing views have been embraced or the intensity of the current passions and conflicts among all groups can’t doubt the impact. However, true patriotism should focus on the usefulness of a decision rather than its popularity; it should follow the path of duty, even if it’s difficult.

In the senate, the nomination was approved by a majority of ten voices; and, in the house of representatives, it was urged as an argument against persevering in the system which had been commenced. On the 18th of April, a motion for taking up the report of the committee of the whole house on the resolution for cutting off all commercial intercourse with Great Britain, was opposed, chiefly on the ground that, as an envoy had been nominated to the court of that country, no obstacle ought to be thrown in his way. The adoption of the resolution would be a bar to negotiation, because it used the language of menace, and manifested a partiality to one of the belligerents which was incompatible with neutrality. It was also an objection to the resolution that it prescribed the terms on which alone a treaty should be made, and was consequently an infringement of the right of the executive to negotiate, and an indelicacy to that department.

In the Senate, the nomination was approved by a majority of ten votes; and in the House of Representatives, it was argued against continuing the system that had been started. On April 18th, a motion to discuss the report from the committee of the whole House regarding the resolution to stop all commercial relations with Great Britain was opposed, mainly because an envoy had been nominated to that country, and no barriers should be placed in his path. Passing the resolution would hinder negotiations, as it carried a threatening tone and showed favoritism toward one of the warring parties, which conflicted with the idea of neutrality. Another issue with the resolution was that it dictated the conditions under which a treaty could be made, thereby infringing on the executive's right to negotiate and being disrespectful to that branch of government.

In support of the motion, it was said, that the measure was strictly within the duty of the legislature, they having solely the right to regulate commerce. That, if there was any indelicacy in the clashing of the proceedings of the legislature and executive, it was to the latter, not to the former, that this indelicacy was to be imputed. The resolution which was the subject of debate had been several days depending in the house, before the nomination of an envoy extraordinary had been made. America having a right, as an independent nation, to regulate her own commerce, the resolution could not lead to war; on the contrary, it was the best means of bringing the negotiation to a happy issue.

In support of the motion, it was said that the measure was completely within the legislature's responsibilities, as they have the exclusive right to regulate commerce. If there was any impropriety in the clash between the legislature and the executive, it was the latter, not the former, that should be held accountable for it. The resolution being debated had been under consideration in the house for several days before the nomination of an extraordinary envoy was made. As an independent nation, America has the right to manage its own commerce, so the resolution couldn't lead to war; on the contrary, it was the best way to reach a positive outcome in the negotiations.

The motion for taking up the report was carried in the affirmative. Some embarrassment was produced by an amendment offered by Mr. Smith of South Carolina, who proposed to add another condition to the restoration of intercourse between the two countries. This was, compensation for the negroes carried away in violation of the treaty of peace. The house avoided this proposition by modifying the resolutions so as to expunge all that part of it which prescribed the conditions on which the intercourse might be restored. A bill was brought in conforming to this resolution, and carried by a considerable majority. In the senate, it was lost by the casting vote of the Vice President. The system which had been taken up in the house of representatives was pressed no further.

The motion to discuss the report was approved. Some awkwardness arose when Mr. Smith from South Carolina suggested adding another condition to the resumption of relations between the two countries. This condition was compensation for the enslaved people taken against the treaty of peace. The house sidestepped this proposal by changing the resolutions to remove all references to the conditions for restoring relations. A bill was introduced that aligned with this resolution and passed by a significant majority. However, in the senate, it was defeated by the Vice President's tie-breaking vote. The approach that had been adopted in the house of representatives was not pursued any further.

The altercations between the executive and the minister of the French republic, had given birth to many questions which had been warmly agitated in the United States, and on which a great diversity of sentiment prevailed.

The conflicts between the executive and the minister of the French republic had raised many questions that were passionately debated in the United States, reflecting a wide range of opinions.

The opinion of the administration that the relations produced by existing treaties, and indeed by a state of peace independent of treaty, imposed certain obligations on the United States, an observance of which it was the duty of the executive to enforce, had been reprobated with extreme severity. It was contended, certainly by the most active, perhaps by the most numerous part of the community, not only that the treaties had been grossly misconstrued, but also that, under any construction of them, the interference of the executive acquired the sanction of legislative authority; that, until the legislature should interpose and annex certain punishments to infractions of neutrality, the natural right possessed by every individual to do any act not forbidden by express law, would furnish a secure protection against those prosecutions which a tyrannical executive might direct for the crime of disregarding its illegal mandates. The right of the President to call out the militia for the detention of privateers about to violate the rules he had established, was, in some instances, denied; attempts to punish those who had engaged, within the United States, to carry on expeditions against foreign nations, were unsuccessful; and a grand jury had refused to find a bill of indictment against Mr. Duplaine, for having rescued, with an armed force, a vessel which had been taken into custody by an officer of justice. Of consequence, however decided the opinion of the executive might be with respect to its constitutional powers and duties, it was desirable to diminish the difficulties to be encountered in performing those duties, by obtaining the sanction of the legislature to the rules which had been established for the preservation of neutrality. The propriety of legislative provision for the case was suggested by the President at the commencement of the session, and a bill was brought into the senate, "in addition to the act for punishing certain crimes against the United States." This bill prohibited the exercise, within the American territory, of those various rights of sovereignty which had been claimed by Mr. Genet, and subjected any citizen of the United States who should be convicted of committing any of the offences therein enumerated, to fine and imprisonment. It also prohibited the condemnation and sale within the United States, of prizes made from the citizens or subjects of nations with whom they were at peace.

The administration believed that the relationships created by existing treaties, and even a state of peace independent of any treaty, placed certain obligations on the United States that the executive was responsible for enforcing. This viewpoint was harshly criticized. Many in the community argued, especially the more vocal and possibly the majority, not only that the treaties had been severely misinterpreted but also that, under any interpretation, the executive's interference required legislative approval. They maintained that until the legislature intervened to impose specific punishments for violations of neutrality, individuals had a natural right to act in ways not explicitly prohibited by law, providing protection against prosecutions that a tyrannical executive might issue for ignoring its illegal orders. Some even denied the President's right to mobilize the militia to detain privateers about to break the rules he established; attempts to punish those who planned expeditions against foreign nations from within the United States were unsuccessful; and a grand jury declined to indict Mr. Duplaine for rescuing a vessel that a law enforcement officer had seized. Therefore, regardless of how firmly the executive believed in its constitutional powers and responsibilities, it was important to reduce the challenges faced in executing those duties by obtaining legislative approval for the rules set for maintaining neutrality. The President suggested that it would be wise for the legislature to address this issue at the start of the session, leading to a bill being introduced in the Senate "in addition to the act for punishing certain crimes against the United States." This bill banned the exercise of various sovereignty rights claimed by Mr. Genet within American territory and imposed fines and imprisonment on any U.S. citizen convicted of the offenses outlined in the bill. It also prohibited the condemnation and sale within the United States of prizes taken from the citizens or subjects of nations with which they were at peace.

Necessary as this measure was, the whole strength of the opposition in the senate was exerted to defeat it. Motions to strike out the most essential clause were successively repeated, and each motion was negatived by the casting vote of the Vice President. It was only by his voice that the bill finally passed.[18]

Necessary as this measure was, the full power of the opposition in the Senate was used to block it. Attempts to remove the most crucial clause were made repeatedly, and each attempt was rejected by the Vice President's tie-breaking vote. It was only because of his vote that the bill finally passed.[18]

In the house of representatives also, this bill encountered a serious opposition. The sections which prohibited the sale of prizes in the United States, and that which declared it to be a misdemeanour to accept a commission from a foreign power within the territory of the United States, to serve against a nation with whom they were at peace, were struck out; but that which respected the acceptance of commissions was afterwards reinstated.

In the House of Representatives, this bill faced significant opposition as well. The parts that banned the sale of prizes in the United States, and the one that stated it was a misdemeanor to accept a commission from a foreign power within U.S. territory to fight against a nation the U.S. was at peace with, were removed; however, the section about accepting commissions was later put back in.

In the course of the session, several other party questions were brought forward, which demonstrated, at the same time, the strength, and the zeal of the opposition. The subject of amending the constitution was revived; and a resolution was agreed to in both houses for altering that instrument, so far as to exempt states from the suits of individuals. While this resolution was before the senate, it was also proposed to render the officers of the bank, and the holders of stock, ineligible to either branch of the legislature; and this proposition, so far as respected officers in the bank, was negatived by a majority of only one vote.[19] A bill to sell the shares of the United States in the bank was negatived by the same majority.

During the session, several other party issues were raised, showcasing both the strength and enthusiasm of the opposition. The topic of amending the constitution came up again, and both houses agreed on a resolution to change the constitution to protect states from being sued by individuals. While this resolution was being discussed in the senate, there was also a proposal to make bank officers and stockholders ineligible for either branch of the legislature; this part of the proposal concerning bank officers was rejected by just one vote. A bill to sell the United States' shares in the bank was also rejected by the same narrow margin.

Inquiry into the conduct of the secretary of the treasury terminates honourably to him.

In both houses inquiries were set on foot respecting the treasury department, which obviously originated in the hope of finding some foundation for censuring that officer, but which failed entirely. In a similar hope, as respected the minister of the United States at Paris, the senate passed a vote requesting the President to lay before that body, his correspondence with the French republic, and also with the department of state.[20]

In both houses, inquiries were initiated regarding the treasury department, which clearly stemmed from the hope of finding some basis for criticizing that officer, but it completely fell short. With a similar intention concerning the minister of the United States in Paris, the senate passed a resolution asking the President to present his correspondence with the French republic, as well as with the state department.[20]

The preparations for an eventual war, which the aspect of public affairs rendered it imprudent to omit, and a heavy appropriation of a million, which, under the title of foreign intercourse, was made for the purpose of purchasing peace from Algiers, and liberating the Americans who were in captivity, created demands upon the treasury which the ordinary revenues were insufficient to satisfy.

The preparations for a possible war, which the state of public affairs made it unwise to ignore, and a large allocation of a million dollars, labeled as foreign relations, aimed at buying peace from Algiers and freeing the Americans who were held captive, placed demands on the treasury that the usual revenues couldn't meet.

That the imposition of additional taxes had become indispensable, was a truth too obvious to be controverted with the semblance of reason; but the subjects of taxation afforded at all times an ample field for discussion.

That the need for additional taxes had become essential was a truth too obvious to be argued against with any semblance of reason; however, the topics of taxation always provided plenty of room for discussion.

The committee of ways and means reported several resolutions for extending the internal duties to various objects which were supposed capable of bearing them, and also proposed an augmentation of the impost on foreign goods imported into the United States, and a direct tax. It was proposed to lay a tax on licenses to sell wines and spirituous liquors, on sales at auction, on pleasure carriages, on snuff manufactured, and on sugar refined in the United States, and also to lay a stamp duty.

The committee on ways and means reported several resolutions for extending internal duties to various items that were thought to be able to handle them. They also suggested increasing the tax on foreign goods imported into the United States and introducing a direct tax. It was proposed to tax licenses for selling wine and alcoholic beverages, sales at auction, pleasure vehicles, manufactured snuff, and refined sugar in the United States, as well as to implement a stamp duty.

Internal taxes laid.

The direct tax was not even supported by the committee. Only thirteen members voted in its favour. The augmentation of the duty on imposts met with no opposition. The internal duties were introduced in separate bills, that each might encounter only those objections which could be made to itself; and that the loss of one might not involve the loss of others. The resolution in favour of stamps was rejected: the others were carried, after repeated and obstinate debates. The members of the opposition were in favour of raising the whole sum required by additional burdens on trade, and by direct taxes.

The committee didn't even back the direct tax. Only thirteen members voted for it. The increase in the tax on imports faced no pushback. The internal taxes were introduced in separate bills, so each could face only its specific objections and the failure of one wouldn’t mean the failure of others. The proposal for stamps was turned down, while the others passed after lengthy and stubborn debates. The opposition members supported raising the total amount needed through extra burdens on trade and direct taxes.

While these measures were depending before congress, memorials and resolutions against them were presented by the manufacturers, which were expressed in terms of disrespect that evidenced the sense in which numbers understood the doctrine, that the people were sovereign, and those who administered the government, their servants. This opportunity for charging the government with tyranny and oppression, with partiality and injustice, was too favourable not to be embraced by the democratic societies, those self proclaimed watchful sentinels over the rights of the people. A person unacquainted with those motives which, in the struggle of party, too often influence the conduct of men, would have supposed a direct tax to be not only in itself more eligible, but to be more acceptable to the community than those which were proposed. To the more judicious observers of the springs of human action, the reverse was known to be the fact.

While these measures were being considered by Congress, manufacturers submitted memorials and resolutions against them, which were expressed in disrespectful terms that showed how many understood the idea that the people are sovereign, and those who run the government are their servants. This was a prime opportunity for accusing the government of tyranny and oppression, and of being biased and unjust, which the democratic societies, those self-proclaimed vigilant guardians of people's rights, were eager to take advantage of. Someone not familiar with the motives that often influence people's behavior in party struggles might have believed that a direct tax was not only more preferable but also more acceptable to the community than the alternatives suggested. However, those who are more discerning about human motivations knew that the opposite was actually true.

 

George Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

George Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

It was in this room that Washington expired, December 14, 1799. Two days previously he was exposed in the saddle, for several hours, to cold and snow, and contracted acute laryngitis for which he was ineffectually treated in the primitive manner of the period. A short time before ceasing to breathe, he said: "I die hard; but I am not afraid to go. I believed from my first attack that I should not survive it. My breath cannot last long." A little later he murmured: "I feel myself going. I thank you for your attentions; but I pray you to take no more trouble about me. Let me go off quietly. I cannot last long." After giving some instructions about his burial he became easier, felt his own pulse, and died without a struggle.

It was in this room that Washington passed away on December 14, 1799. Two days earlier, he had been riding in the cold and snow for several hours, which led to him developing acute laryngitis that was treated ineffectively with the basic medical practices of the time. Just before he stopped breathing, he said, "I’m dying hard, but I’m not afraid to go. I believed from the start of my sickness that I wouldn’t survive it. My breath can’t last much longer." A little later, he whispered, "I can feel myself fading. Thank you for your care, but please don’t worry about me anymore. Let me go peacefully. I can’t last much longer." After giving some instructions about his burial, he became more comfortable, felt his own pulse, and died without any struggle.

 

The friends of the administration supported the proposed system against every objection to it, because they believed it to be more productive, and less unpopular, than a direct tax. It is not impossible that what recommended the system to one party, might constitute a real objection to it with those who believed that the public interest required a change[21] in the public councils.

The supporters of the administration backed the proposed system despite all the objections, as they thought it would be more effective and less unpopular than a direct tax. It's possible that what made the system appealing to one group could be seen as a genuine concern by those who believed that the public interest needed a shift in the public decision-making.[21]

On the ninth of June, this active and stormy session was closed by an adjournment to the first Monday in the succeeding November.

On June ninth, this busy and tumultuous session ended with an adjournment until the first Monday of the following November.

Congress adjourns.

The public was not less agitated than the legislature had been, by those interesting questions which had occasioned some of the most animated and eloquent discussions that had ever taken place on the floor of the house of representatives. Mr. Madison's resolutions especially, continued to be the theme of general conversation; and, for a long time, divided parties throughout the United States. The struggle for public opinion was ardent; and each party supported its pretensions, not only with those arguments which each deemed conclusive, but also by those reciprocal criminations which, perhaps, each, in part, believed.

The public was just as stirred up as the legislature had been by those important questions that sparked some of the most lively and persuasive debates ever seen in the House of Representatives. Mr. Madison's resolutions, in particular, remained a hot topic of conversation and divided parties across the United States for quite some time. The battle for public opinion was fierce, and each side backed its claims not only with what they believed were convincing arguments but also through mutual accusations that, perhaps, each partially believed.

The opposition declared that the friends of the administration were an aristocratic and corrupt faction, who, from a desire to introduce monarchy, were hostile to France, and under the influence of Britain; that they sought every occasion to increase expense, to augment debt, to multiply the public burdens, to create armies and navies, and, by the instrumentality of all this machinery, to govern and enslave the people: that they were a paper nobility, whose extreme sensibility at every measure which threatened the funds, induced a tame submission to injuries and insults, which the interests and honour of the nation required them to resist.

The opposition claimed that the supporters of the administration were an aristocratic and corrupt group, who wanted to bring about a monarchy and were therefore opposed to France, acting under the influence of Britain. They were accused of seizing every opportunity to increase expenses, raise debt, pile on public burdens, form armies and navies, and, through all of this, control and oppress the people. They were seen as a paper nobility, whose extreme sensitivity to any measure that threatened their finances led them to passively accept the harm and insults that the nation’s interests and honor demanded they fight against.

The friends of the administration retorted, that the opposition was prepared to sacrifice the best interests of their country on the altar of the French revolution. That they were willing to go to war for French, not for American objects: that while they urged war they withheld the means of supporting it, in order the more effectually to humble and disgrace the government: that they were so blinded by their passion for France as to confound crimes with meritorious deeds, and to abolish the natural distinction between virtue and vice: that the principles which they propagated, and with which they sought to intoxicate the people, were, in practice, incompatible with the existence of government. That they were the apostles of anarchy, not of freedom; and were consequently not the friends of real and rational liberty.

The supporters of the administration shot back that the opposition was ready to sacrifice the best interests of their country for the sake of the French revolution. They claimed that the opposition was willing to go to war for French interests, not American ones: that while they called for war, they were withholding the resources needed to support it, in order to further humiliate and discredit the government: that they were so blinded by their passion for France that they confused crimes with good deeds and blurred the natural line between virtue and vice: that the principles they spread and used to intoxicate the public were, in practice, incompatible with the existence of government. They were advocates of anarchy, not freedom; therefore, they weren't true friends of genuine and rational liberty.


CHAPTER III.

Genet recalled.... Is succeeded by Mr. Fauchet.... Gouverneur Morris recalled, and is succeeded by Mr. Monroe.... Kentucky remonstrance.... Intemperate resolutions of the people of that state.... General Wayne defeats the Indians on the Miamis.... Insurrection in the western parts of Pennsylvania.... Quelled by the prompt and vigorous measures of the government.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Democratic societies.... Resignation of Colonel Hamilton.... Is succeeded by Mr. Wolcott.... Resignation of General Knox.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.... Conditionally ratified by the President.... The treaty unpopular.... Mr. Randolph resigns.... Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.... Colonel M'Henry appointed secretary of war.... Charge against the President rejected..... Treaty with the Indians north-west of the Ohio.... With Algiers.... With Spain.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet..... The house of representatives call upon the President for papers relating to the treaty with Great Britain.... He declines sending them.... Debates upon the treaty making power.... Upon the bill for making appropriations to carry into execution the treaty with Great Britain.... Congress adjourns.... The President endeavours to procure the liberation of Lafayette.

Genet recalled.... Mr. Fauchet takes over.... Gouverneur Morris is recalled and replaced by Mr. Monroe.... Kentucky protests.... Extreme resolutions from the people of that state.... General Wayne defeats the Indians in the Miamis.... Insurrection in western Pennsylvania.... Suppressed by the swift and strong actions of the government.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Democratic societies.... Colonel Hamilton resigns.... Mr. Wolcott takes his place.... General Knox resigns.... Colonel Pickering replaces him.... Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.... Conditionally ratified by the President.... The treaty is unpopular.... Mr. Randolph resigns.... Colonel Pickering succeeds him.... Colonel M'Henry is appointed secretary of war.... Charges against the President are rejected..... Treaty with the Indians northwest of the Ohio.... With Algiers.... With Spain.... Meeting of Congress.... President's speech.... Mr. Adet replaces Mr. Fauchet..... The House of Representatives asks the President for documents related to the treaty with Great Britain.... He refuses to send them.... Debates about the treaty-making power.... About the bill for funding the treaty with Great Britain.... Congress adjourns.... The President tries to secure Lafayette's release.

 

1794

That the most material of those legislative measures on which the two great parties of the United States were divided, might be presented in one unbroken view, some transactions have been passed over, which will now be noticed.

That the main legislative measures that divided the two major parties in the United States can be seen in one complete overview, some events have been overlooked, which will now be addressed.

In that spirit of conciliation, which adopts the least irritating means for effecting its objects, the President had resolved to bear with the insults, the resistance, and the open defiance of Mr. Genet, until his appeal to the friendship and the policy of the French republic should be fairly tried. Early in January, this resolution was shaken, by fresh proofs of the perseverance of that minister, in a line of conduct, not to be tolerated by a nation, which has not surrendered all pretensions to self government. Mr. Genet had meditated, and deliberately planned, two expeditions to be carried on from the territories of the United States, against the dominions of Spain; and had, as minister of the French republic, granted commissions to citizens of the United States, who were privately recruiting troops for the proposed service. The first was destined against the Floridas, and the second against Louisiana. The detail of the plans had been settled. The pay, rations, clothing, plunder, and division of the conquered lands to be allotted to the military; and the proportion of the acquisitions to be reserved to the republic of France, were arranged. The troops destined to act against the Floridas were to be raised in the three southern states, were to rendezvous in Georgia, were to be aided by a body of Indians and were to co-operate with the French fleet, should one arrive on the coast. This scheme had been the subject of a correspondence between the executive and Mr. Genet, but was in full progress in the preceding December, when by the vigilance of the legislature of South Carolina, it was more particularly developed, and some of the principal agents were arrested.

In the spirit of finding common ground, which seeks the least confrontational way to achieve its goals, the President decided to tolerate the insults, the opposition, and the outright defiance of Mr. Genet, until his appeal to the friendship and policies of the French republic could be properly assessed. However, early in January, this decision was shaken by new evidence of that minister's persistence in a course of action that would not be accepted by a nation that hasn't given up all claims to self-government. Mr. Genet had planned and intentionally organized two missions to be carried out from U.S. territory against Spanish possessions. As the minister of the French republic, he issued commissions to U.S. citizens who were secretly recruiting troops for these missions. The first mission was aimed at Florida, and the second at Louisiana. The details of the plans were finalized, including pay, supplies, clothing, spoils, and the division of conquered lands for the military, along with how much would be reserved for the republic of France. The troops intended to attack Florida were to be recruited in the three southern states, gather in Georgia, receive support from a group of Native Americans, and coordinate with the French fleet, if one arrived on the coast. This plan had been a topic of discussion between the executive and Mr. Genet, but it was fully underway the previous December when the legislature of South Carolina, through vigilance, uncovered more details, leading to the arrest of several key agents.

About the same time, intelligence less authentic, but wearing every circumstance of probability, was received, stating that the expedition against Louisiana, which was to be carried on down the Ohio from Kentucky, was in equal maturity.

Around the same time, less reliable information, but presented with all the signs of likelihood, came in, claiming that the expedition against Louisiana, which was supposed to be launched down the Ohio from Kentucky, was equally well-developed.

Genet recalled.

This intelligence seemed to render a further forbearance incompatible with the dignity, perhaps with the safety of the United States. The question of superseding the diplomatic functions of Mr. Genet, and depriving him of the privileges attached to that character, was brought before the cabinet; and a message to congress was prepared, communicating these transactions, and avowing a determination to adopt that measure within —— days, unless, in the mean time, one or the other house should signify the opinion that it was not adviseable so to do. In this state, the business was arrested by receiving a letter from Mr. Morris, announcing, officially, the recall of this rash minister.

This information made it clear that any further tolerance would compromise the dignity, and possibly the safety, of the United States. The issue of removing Mr. Genet from his diplomatic role and taking away the privileges that came with it was presented to the cabinet. A message to Congress was drafted, outlining these events and expressing a decision to go ahead with that action within —— days, unless one of the houses indicated that it would be unwise to proceed. At this point, the matter was halted when they received a letter from Mr. Morris, officially announcing the recall of this reckless minister.

Is succeeded by Mr. Fauchet.

Mr. Fauchet, the successor of Mr. Genet, arrived in February, and brought with him strong assurances that his government totally disapproved the conduct of his predecessor. He avowed a determination to avoid whatever might be offensive to those to whom he was deputed, and a wish to carry into full effect the friendly dispositions of his nation towards the United States. For some time, his actions were in the spirit of these professions.

Mr. Fauchet, who took over from Mr. Genet, arrived in February and brought strong assurances that his government completely disapproved of his predecessor's actions. He expressed a clear intention to avoid anything that might upset those he was assigned to, and a desire to fully implement his country's friendly attitude toward the United States. For a while, his actions reflected these statements.

Gouverneur Morris is recalled and is succeed by Mr. Monroe.

Not long after the arrival of Mr. Fauchet, the executive government of France requested the recall of Mr. Morris. With this request the president immediately complied; and Mr. Monroe, a senator from Virginia, who had embraced with ardour the cause of the French republic, and was particularly acceptable to the party in opposition, was appointed to succeed him.

Not long after Mr. Fauchet arrived, the French government asked for Mr. Morris to be recalled. The president quickly agreed to this request, and Mr. Monroe, a senator from Virginia who passionately supported the French republic and was well-liked by the opposition party, was chosen to take his place.

The discontents which had been long fomented in the western country, had assumed a serious and alarming appearance.

The frustrations that had been building up in the western region had taken on a serious and concerning form.

Kentucky remonstrance.

A remonstrance to the President and congress of the United States from the inhabitants of Kentucky, respecting the navigation of the Mississippi, was laid before the executive, and each branch of the legislature. The style of this paper accorded well with the instructions under which it had been prepared.

A complaint to the President and Congress of the United States from the people of Kentucky about the navigation of the Mississippi was presented to the executive and both houses of the legislature. The tone of this document matched the guidelines under which it was created.

In the language of an offended sovereign people, injured by the maladministration of public servants, it demanded the use of the Mississippi as a natural right which had been unjustly withheld; and charged the government, openly, with being under the influence of a local policy, which had prevented its making one single real effort for the security of a good which was all essential to the prosperity of the western people. Several intemperate aspersions upon the legislative and executive departments, accompanied with complaints that the course of the negotiations had not been communicated to those who were interested in the event, and with threats obviously pointing to dismemberment, were concluded with a declaration that nothing would remunerate the western people for the suspension of this great territorial right; that they must possess it; that the god of nature had given them the means of acquiring and enjoying it; and that to permit a sacrifice of it to any other considerations, would be a crime against themselves and their posterity.

In the words of an outraged population, hurt by the mismanagement of public officials, they demanded the use of the Mississippi as a natural right that had been unfairly taken away; and they accused the government, openly, of being swayed by local interests, which had stopped it from making any serious effort to secure something that was crucial for the prosperity of the western communities. There were several harsh criticisms of the legislative and executive branches, along with complaints that those affected by the outcomes had not been kept informed about the negotiations, and there were threats clearly aimed at division. It ended with a statement that nothing could compensate the western people for the loss of this vital territorial right; that they had to have it; that nature had given them the ability to obtain and enjoy it; and that allowing it to be sacrificed for any other reasons would be a crime against themselves and future generations.

In the senate, the subject was referred to a committee, who reported, "that in the negotiation now carrying on at Madrid between the United States and Spain, the right of the former to the free navigation of the Mississippi is well asserted and demonstrated, and their claim to its enjoyment is pursued with all the assiduity and firmness which the magnitude of the subject demands; and will doubtless continue to be so pursued until the object shall be obtained, or adverse circumstances shall render the further progress of the negotiation impracticable. That in the present state of the business, it would be improper for congress to interfere. But in order to satisfy the citizens of the United States more immediately interested in the event of this negotiation, that the United States have uniformly asserted their right to the free use of the navigation of the river Mississippi, and have employed and will continue to pursue such measures as are best adapted to obtain the enjoyment of this important territorial right, the committee recommend that it be resolved by the senate—

In the Senate, the subject was sent to a committee, which reported, "that in the ongoing negotiations in Madrid between the United States and Spain, the U.S. right to freely navigate the Mississippi River is clearly established and demonstrated, and their pursuit of this right is being carried out with all the diligence and determination that the importance of the issue requires; and it will certainly continue to be pursued until the goal is achieved, or unfavorable circumstances make further progress impossible. Given the current status of the negotiations, it would be inappropriate for Congress to intervene. However, to reassure the citizens of the United States who are directly impacted by the outcome of this negotiation, it should be noted that the United States has consistently asserted its right to freely use the navigation of the Mississippi River and has taken and will continue to take the best steps to secure this crucial territorial right. Therefore, the committee recommends that the Senate resolve—

"That the President of the United States be, and he hereby is requested to cause to be communicated to the executive of the state of Kentucky,[22] such part of the existing negotiation between the United States and Spain relative to this subject, as he may deem adviseable, and consistent with the course of the negotiation."

"That the President of the United States is hereby asked to communicate to the governor of Kentucky,[22] the relevant parts of the current negotiations between the United States and Spain regarding this matter, as he sees fit and consistent with the negotiation process."

In the house of representatives also, a resolution was passed, expressing the conviction of the house, that the executive was urging the claim of the United States to the navigation of the Mississippi, in the manner most likely to prove successful.

In the House of Representatives, a resolution was also passed, stating the belief of the House that the executive was pushing the United States' claim to navigate the Mississippi in the way that was most likely to succeed.

Had the measures pursued in the western country been dictated, exclusively, by a wish to obtain an important good, these resolutions would have allayed the ferment which had been excited. The effect which must be produced on Spain by the insinuation that the continuance of their connexion with the Atlantic states depended on obtaining the object they sought, was too apparent to escape the notice of men endowed with an ordinary share of intelligence. But when the real motives for human action are latent, it is vain to demonstrate the unreasonableness of those which are avowed.

If the actions taken in the western country had been purely motivated by a desire to achieve an important goal, these decisions would have eased the unrest that had been stirred up. The impact that the suggestion would have on Spain—that their continued connection to the Atlantic states relied on achieving their goal—was too obvious for anyone with a basic level of intelligence to overlook. But when the true reasons for people's actions are hidden, it’s useless to argue against the obvious reasons they claim.

After the reception of these resolutions, a number of the principal citizens from various parts of Kentucky assembled at Lexington, and among many intemperate resolutions passed the following:

After the reception of these resolutions, several key citizens from different parts of Kentucky gathered in Lexington, and among the many extreme resolutions passed, the following:

Intemperate resolutions of the people of that state.

"That the general government whose duty it was to put us in possession of this right (the navigation of the Mississippi) have, either through design or mistaken policy, adopted no effectual measures for its attainment.

"That the federal government, which was responsible for securing our right to navigate the Mississippi, has either intentionally or through misguided policies failed to take effective action to achieve this."

"That even the measures they have adopted, have been uniformly concealed from us, and veiled in mysterious secrecy.

"That even the steps they've taken have been completely hidden from us and wrapped in mysterious secrecy."

"That civil liberty is prostituted, when the servants of the people are suffered to tell their masters, that communications which they may judge important ought not to be intrusted to them."

"That civil liberty is undermined when public servants are allowed to tell the people that important communications shouldn't be entrusted to them."

These resolutions concluded with a recommendation of county meetings, of county committees of correspondence, and of a convention when it might be judged expedient, to deliberate on the proper steps for the attainment and security of their just rights.

These resolutions ended with a suggestion for county meetings, county committees for communication, and a convention when it seemed appropriate, to discuss the right actions for achieving and protecting their rightful interests.

To estimate these resolutions accurately, it will be necessary to view in connexion with them, the military preparations which were making in that country, under the authority of France.

To accurately estimate these resolutions, it's essential to consider the military preparations being made in that country under the authority of France.

In October, 1793, it was alleged by the Spanish commissioners, that four Frenchmen had left Philadelphia, empowered by the minister of the French republic to prepare an expedition, in Kentucky, against New Orleans. This fact was immediately communicated by Mr. Jefferson to the governor of that state, with a request that he would use those means of prevention which the law enabled him to employ. Binding to good behaviour was particularly recommended. This letter was accompanied by one from the secretary of war, conveying the request of the President, that, if preventive means should fail, effectual military force should be employed to arrest the expedition; and General Wayne was ordered to hold a body of troops at the disposal of the governor, should he find the militia insufficient for his purpose.

In October 1793, the Spanish commissioners claimed that four Frenchmen had left Philadelphia, authorized by the minister of the French republic to organize an expedition in Kentucky against New Orleans. Mr. Jefferson quickly informed the governor of that state, asking him to take any legal measures necessary to prevent the expedition. He specifically suggested that the governor recommend good behavior. This letter was accompanied by one from the secretary of war, relaying the President's request that if preventive measures failed, effective military force should be used to stop the expedition. General Wayne was instructed to keep a contingent of troops ready for the governor's use if the militia proved insufficient for his needs.

The governor had already received information, that a citizen of Kentucky was in possession of a commission appointing him Commander-in-chief of the proposed expedition; and that the Frenchmen alluded to in the letter of Mr. Jefferson, had arrived, and, far from affecting concealment declared, that they only waited for money which they expected soon to receive, in order to commence their operations.

The governor had already received news that a citizen of Kentucky had a commission appointing him Commander-in-chief of the planned expedition; and that the French mentioned in Mr. Jefferson's letter had arrived and, instead of trying to hide, openly stated that they were just waiting for the money they expected to receive soon so they could start their operations.

The following extract of a letter from the governor, on this subject, exhibits a curious specimen of the conclusions to which gentlemen were conducted by the course of political reasoning which prevailed at the day.

The following extract of a letter from the governor, on this subject, shows an interesting example of the conclusions that people reached through the political reasoning that was common at the time.

After stating the facts above alluded to, he says, "I have great doubts, even if they do attempt to carry their plan into execution, (provided they manage their business with prudence,) whether there is any legal authority to restrain or punish them, at least before they have actually accomplished it. For if it is lawful for any one citizen of this state to leave it, it is equally so for any number of them to do it. It is also lawful to carry with them any quantity of provisions, arms, and ammunition; and if the act is lawful in itself, there is nothing but the particular intention with which it is done that can possibly make it unlawful. But I know of no law which inflicts a punishment on intention only; or any criterion by which to decide what would be sufficient evidence of that intention, if it was a proper subject for legal censure.

After discussing the facts mentioned earlier, he states, "I have serious doubts, even if they try to follow through with their plan (assuming they handle their affairs wisely), whether there is any legal authority to stop or punish them, at least before they actually go through with it. If it’s legal for one citizen of this state to leave, then it's equally legal for a group of them to do the same. It’s also lawful for them to take as many supplies, weapons, and ammunition as they want; and if the action itself is lawful, the only thing that could make it unlawful is the specific intention behind it. However, I don’t know of any law that punishes someone for intention alone, or any standard to determine what would constitute enough evidence of that intention if it were something subject to legal punishment."

"I shall, upon all occasions, be averse to the exercise of any power which I do not consider myself as clearly and explicitly invested with, much less would I assume power to exercise it against men whom I consider as friends and brethren, in favour of a man whom I view as an enemy and a tyrant. I shall also feel but little inclination to take an active part in punishing or restraining any of my fellow citizens for a supposed intrusion only, to gratify or remove the fears of the minister or a prince who openly withholds from us an invaluable right, and who secretly instigates against us a most savage and cruel enemy."

"I will always be against using any power that I don’t clearly believe I have, and I definitely won’t take action against people I see as friends and allies just to benefit someone I consider an enemy and a tyrant. I also won’t be very motivated to punish or restrict any of my fellow citizens for just a supposed wrongdoing, just to satisfy the fears of a minister or a prince who openly denies us a priceless right and secretly encourages a ruthless enemy against us."

Upon the receipt of this extraordinary letter, the President directed General Wayne to establish a military post at Fort Massac, on the Ohio, for the purpose of stopping by force, if peaceful means should fail, any body of armed men who should be proceeding down that river.

Upon receiving this exceptional letter, the President instructed General Wayne to set up a military post at Fort Massac, on the Ohio, to forcibly stop, if peaceful methods failed, any group of armed men heading down that river.

This precaution appears to have been necessary. The preparations for the expedition were, for some time, carried on with considerable activity; and there is reason to believe that it was not absolutely relinquished, until Spain ceased to be the enemy of France.[23]

This precaution seemed necessary. The preparations for the expedition were carried out with a lot of energy for quite some time; and there's reason to think that it wasn't completely abandoned until Spain was no longer an enemy of France.[23]

The proceedings of the legislature of South Carolina embarrassed those who had planned the invasion of the Floridas, but did not entirely disconcert them. In April, a French sloop of war arrived on the confines of Georgia and East Florida, with a small body of troops, who were landed on one of the islands on the coast, south of the St. Mary, and who declared themselves to be part of a larger force, which might soon be expected. Upon their arrival, several small corps of Americans who had engaged to serve the republic of France, assembled in Georgia, for the purpose, as was universally understood, of co-operating with the French against the neighbouring dominions of Spain.

The actions of the South Carolina legislature caused some embarrassment for those who were planning to invade Florida, but they didn’t throw them off completely. In April, a French war sloop arrived near the borders of Georgia and East Florida, carrying a small group of troops. They landed on one of the islands along the coast, south of the St. Mary River, and claimed to be part of a larger force that would soon arrive. After their arrival, several small groups of Americans who had agreed to fight for the Republic of France gathered in Georgia, with the widely understood goal of teaming up with the French against the nearby Spanish territories.

The interposition of government, and the inadequacy of the force to the object, disconcerted this expedition. Its leader conducted his followers into the Indian country, and endeavoured to make a settlement on their hunting grounds.

The government's interference and the lack of enough force for the task disrupted this expedition. Its leader took his followers into Indian territory and tried to establish a settlement on their hunting grounds.

While these turbulent scenes were acting, the loud plaudits of France, which were dictated by a passionate devotion to that country, were reechoed from every part of the American continent. The friendship of that republic for the United States, her respect for their rights, the ingratitude with which her continuing benefits were repaid, the injustice done her by the executive, its tameness under British insults, were the inexhaustible themes of loud, angry, and unceasing declamation. It required a firmness of mind, and a weight of character possessed only by the chief magistrate, to maintain the ground he had taken, against such an assemblage of passions and of prejudices.

While these chaotic scenes were happening, the loud cheers from France, fueled by a deep love for that country, were echoed across the entire American continent. The friendship of that republic towards the United States, her respect for their rights, the ingratitude shown towards her ongoing support, and the injustices inflicted on her by the government, along with its passive response to British insults, were endless topics of loud, angry, and relentless debate. It took a strong mind and a level of character that only the president possessed to stick to his stance against such a mix of emotions and biases.

It will be recollected that in the preceding year, the attempt to treat with the hostile Indians had suspended the operations of General Wayne until the season for action had nearly passed away. After the total failure of negotiation, the campaign was opened with as much vigour as a prudent attention to circumstances would permit.

It’s worth remembering that last year, the effort to negotiate with the hostile Indians delayed General Wayne’s operations until the time for action was almost over. After the complete failure of negotiations, the campaign began with as much energy as careful consideration of the situation would allow.

The Indians had expected an attempt upon their villages, and had collected in full force, with the apparent determination of risking a battle in their defence. A battle was desired by the American general; but the consequences of another defeat were too serious to warrant him in putting more to hazard by precipitate movements, than the circumstances of the war required. The negotiations with the Indians were not terminated till September, and it was then too late to complete the preparations which would enable General Wayne to enter their country and to hold it. He, therefore, contented himself with collecting his army and penetrating about six miles in advance of Fort Jefferson into the uninhabited country, where he established himself for the winter, in a camp called Greensville. After fortifying his camp, he took possession of the ground on which the Americans had been defeated in 1791, where he erected Fort Recovery. These positions afforded considerable protection to the frontiers, and facilitated the opening of the ensuing campaign.

The Native Americans anticipated an attack on their villages and gathered in full force, clearly ready to fight for their defense. The American general wanted a battle, but the risk of another defeat was too great to justify taking reckless actions that were not necessary given the circumstances of the war. The negotiations with the Native Americans did not wrap up until September, and by that time, it was too late to finish the necessary preparations for General Wayne to enter their territory and secure it. Instead, he settled for assembling his army and advancing about six miles beyond Fort Jefferson into the uninhabited area, where he set up camp for the winter, known as Greensville. After reinforcing his camp, he occupied the site where the Americans had been defeated in 1791 and built Fort Recovery. These locations provided significant protection for the frontiers and helped facilitate the start of the next campaign.

Seeing only the dark side of every measure adopted by the government, and not disinclined to militia expeditions made at the expense of the United States, the people of Kentucky loudly charged the President with a total disregard of their safety, pronounced the continental troops entirely useless, declared that the Indians were to be kept in awe alone by militia, and insisted that the power should be deposited with some person in their state, to call them out at his discretion, at the charge of the United States.

Seeing only the negative aspects of every measure taken by the government, and not being opposed to militia missions funded by the United States, the people of Kentucky loudly accused the President of completely ignoring their safety. They declared that the continental troops were completely useless, insisted that the Indians could only be kept in check by militia, and demanded that the authority be given to someone in their state to summon them as needed, at the expense of the United States.

Meanwhile, some steps were taken by the governor of Upper Canada which were well calculated to increase suspicions respecting the dispositions of Great Britain.

Meanwhile, the governor of Upper Canada took some actions that were likely to raise suspicions about Great Britain's intentions.

It was believed by the President, not without cause,[24] that the cabinet of London was disposed to avail itself of the non-execution of that article of the treaty of peace, which stipulates for the payment of debts, to justify a permanent detention of the posts on the southern side of the great lakes, and to establish a new boundary line, whereby those lakes should be entirely comprehended in Upper Canada. Early in the spring, a detachment from the garrison of Detroit repossessed and fortified a position near fifty miles south of that station, on the Miamis of the lakes, a river which empties into Lake Erie at its westernmost point.

It was believed by the President, not without reason,[24] that the cabinet in London was inclined to take advantage of the failure to enforce that article of the peace treaty, which calls for the payment of debts, to justify keeping the posts on the southern side of the great lakes indefinitely and to set up a new boundary line, ensuring that those lakes would be entirely included in Upper Canada. Early in the spring, a detachment from the garrison of Detroit recaptured and fortified a position about fifty miles south of that station, on the Miamis of the lakes, a river that flows into Lake Erie at its westernmost point.

This movement, the speech of Lord Dorchester, and other facts which strengthened the belief that the hostile Indians were at least countenanced by the English, were the subjects of a correspondence between the secretary of state and Mr. Hammond, in which crimination was answered by recrimination, in which a considerable degree of mutual irritation was displayed, and in which each supported his charges against the nation of the other, much better than he defended his own. It did not, however, in any manner, affect the operations of the army.

This movement, Lord Dorchester's speech, and other facts that reinforced the belief that the hostile Indians were at least being supported by the English were discussed in correspondence between the secretary of state and Mr. Hammond. In these exchanges, accusations were met with counter-accusations, revealing a significant level of mutual irritation, where each party defended their claims against the other nation much more effectively than they justified their own. However, this did not impact the army's operations in any way.

The delays inseparable from the transportation of necessary supplies through an uninhabited country, infested by an active enemy peculiarly skilled in partisan war, unavoidably protracted the opening of the campaign until near midsummer. Meanwhile, several sharp skirmishes took place, in one of which a few white men were stated to be mingled with the Indians.

The delays that come with transporting essential supplies through a deserted area, occupied by an enemy skilled in guerrilla warfare, inevitably pushed back the start of the campaign until just before midsummer. In the meantime, there were several intense skirmishes, including one where a few white men were reported to be fighting alongside the Indians.

On the 8th of August, General Wayne reached the confluence of the Au Glaize and the Miamis of the lakes, where he threw up some works of defence, and protection for magazines. The richest and most extensive settlements of the western Indians lay about this place.

On August 8th, General Wayne arrived at the point where the Au Glaize and the Miamis meet, where he built some defensive structures and set up protection for supplies. The wealthiest and most widespread settlements of the western Indians were located around this area.

The mouth of the Au Glaize is distant about thirty miles from the post occupied by the British on the Miamis of the lakes, in the vicinity of which the whole strength of the enemy, amounting, according to intelligence on which General Wayne relied, to rather less than two thousand men, was collected. The continental legion was not much inferior in number to the Indians: and a reinforcement of about eleven hundred mounted militia from Kentucky, commanded by General Scott, gave a decided superiority of strength to the army of Wayne. That the Indians had determined to give him battle was well understood; and the discipline of his legion, the ardour of all his troops, and the superiority of his numbers, authorized him confidently to expect a favourable issue. Yet, in pursuance of that policy by which the United States had been uniformly actuated, he determined to make one more effort for the attainment of peace without bloodshed. Messengers were despatched to the several hostile tribes who were assembled in his front, inviting them to appoint deputies to meet him on his march, in order to negotiate a lasting peace.

The mouth of the Au Glaize is about thirty miles away from the British post located on the Miamis of the lakes, where the enemy had gathered all their forces, which, based on intelligence that General Wayne trusted, numbered just under two thousand men. The continental legion was nearly equal in size to the Indians, and a boost of around eleven hundred mounted militia from Kentucky, led by General Scott, gave Wayne's army a clear advantage in strength. It was well-known that the Indians planned to fight him; however, the discipline of his legion, the enthusiasm of all his troops, and their superior numbers made him confidently expect a positive outcome. Still, following the policy that the United States had consistently pursued, he decided to make one last attempt to achieve peace without resorting to violence. He sent messengers to the various hostile tribes gathered in front of him, inviting them to choose representatives to meet him during his march to negotiate a lasting peace.

On the 15th of August, the American army advanced down the Miamis, with its right covered by that river; and on the 18th, arrived at the rapids. Here they halted on the 19th, in order to erect a temporary work for the protection of the baggage, and to reconnoitre the situation of the enemy.

On August 15th, the American army moved down the Miamis, with its right side protected by the river; and on the 18th, they reached the rapids. They stopped on the 19th to build a temporary fort for protecting the supplies and to scout out the enemy's position.

The Indians were advantageously posted behind a thick wood, and behind the British fort.

The Indians were strategically positioned behind a dense forest and behind the British fort.

General Wayne defeats the Indians at the Miamis.

At eight in the morning of the 20th, the American army advanced in columns: the legion with its right flank covered by the Miamis: One brigade of mounted volunteers commanded by General Todd was on the left; and the other under General Barbee was in the rear. A select battalion, commanded by Major Price, moved in front of the legion, sufficiently in advance to give timely notice for the troops to form in case of action.[25]

At eight in the morning on the 20th, the American army moved forward in columns: the legion with its right side protected by the Miamis. One brigade of mounted volunteers led by General Todd was on the left, and the other under General Barbee was at the rear. A chosen battalion, led by Major Price, advanced in front of the legion, far enough ahead to alert the troops to get into position in case of action.[25]

After marching about five miles, Major Price received a heavy fire from a concealed enemy, and was compelled to retreat.

After marching about five miles, Major Price was hit with heavy gunfire from a hidden enemy and had to fall back.

The Indians had chosen their ground with judgment. They had advanced into the thick wood in front of the British works which extends several miles west from the Miamis, and had taken a position, rendered almost inaccessible to horse by a quantity of fallen timber which appeared to have been blown up in a tornado. They were formed in three lines, within supporting distance of each other; and, as is their custom, with a very extended front. Their line stretched to the west, at right angles with the river, about two miles; and their immediate effort was to turn the left flank of the American army.

The Native Americans had chosen their position wisely. They had moved into the dense woods in front of the British fortifications that stretch several miles west of the Miamis and found a spot that was nearly unreachable for horses due to a lot of fallen timber that seemed to have been uprooted in a tornado. They were lined up in three rows, close enough to support each other, and, as was their custom, they had a very wide front. Their line extended westward, at a right angle to the river, for about two miles; and their main goal was to outflank the left side of the American army.

On the discharge of the first rifle, the legion was formed in two lines, and the front was ordered to advance with trailed arms, and rouse the enemy from his covert at the point of the bayonet; then, and not until then, to deliver a fire, and to press the fugitives too closely to allow them time to load after discharging their pieces. Soon perceiving the strength of the enemy in front, and that he was endeavouring to turn the American left, the general ordered the second line to support the first. The legion cavalry, led by Captain Campbell, was directed to penetrate between the Indians and the river, where the wood was less thick and entangled, in order to charge their left flank; and General Scott, at the head of the mounted volunteers, was directed to make a considerable circuit, and to turn their right flank.

On the sound of the first rifle, the legion formed two lines. The front line was told to advance with their weapons lowered, driving the enemy out of hiding with the tips of their bayonets; only then were they to fire and chase the fleeing troops closely enough that they wouldn’t have time to reload after shooting. Soon realizing the enemy's strength in front and their attempt to flank the American left, the general ordered the second line to support the first. The legion cavalry, led by Captain Campbell, was instructed to move between the Indians and the river, where the underbrush was less thick and tangled, in order to charge their left flank; and General Scott, leading the mounted volunteers, was told to take a wide route to flank their right side.

These orders were executed with spirit and promptitude; but such was the impetuosity of the charge made by the first line of infantry, so entirely was the enemy broken by it, and so rapid was the pursuit, that only a small part of the second line and of the mounted volunteers could get into the action. In the course of one hour, the Indians were driven more than two miles, through thick woods; when the pursuit terminated within gun shot of the British fort.

These orders were carried out with enthusiasm and speed; but the charge made by the first line of infantry was so powerful, the enemy was completely shattered by it, and the pursuit was so swift that only a small portion of the second line and the mounted volunteers could join in. Within an hour, the Indians were pushed back more than two miles through dense woods; the pursuit ended within gunshot of the British fort.

General Wayne remained three days on the banks of the Miamis, in front of the field of battle, during which time the houses and cornfields above and below the fort, some of them within pistol shot of it, were reduced to ashes. During these operations, a correspondence took place between General Wayne and Major Campbell, the commandant of the fort, which is stated by the former in such a manner as to show, that hostilities between them were avoided only by the prudent acquiescence of the latter in this devastation of property within the range of his guns.

General Wayne stayed for three days along the banks of the Miamis, facing the battlefield. During this time, the houses and cornfields around the fort, some of them only a short distance away, were burned to the ground. Throughout these events, there was communication between General Wayne and Major Campbell, the fort's commander. Wayne's account suggests that they only avoided direct conflict because Campbell wisely accepted the destruction of property within the range of his cannons.

On the 28th, the army returned to Au Glaize by easy marches, destroying on its route all the villages and corn within fifty miles of the river.

On the 28th, the army made its way back to Au Glaize, marching at a comfortable pace and destroying all the villages and crops within fifty miles of the river along the way.

In this decisive battle, the loss of the Americans, in killed and wounded, amounted to one hundred and seven, including officers. Among the dead was Captain Campbell, who commanded the cavalry, and Lieutenant Towles of the infantry, both of whom fell in the first charge. General Wayne bestowed great and well merited praise on the courage and alacrity displayed by every part of the army.

In this crucial battle, the American losses, in terms of dead and injured, totaled one hundred and seven, including officers. Among the dead was Captain Campbell, who led the cavalry, and Lieutenant Towles of the infantry, both of whom were killed in the first charge. General Wayne gave a lot of deserved praise to the bravery and quickness shown by every part of the army.

The hostility of the Indians still continuing, their whole country was laid waste, and forts were erected in the heart of their settlements, to prevent their return.

The hostility of the Native Americans still ongoing, their entire land was devastated, and forts were built in the center of their communities to stop their return.

This seasonable victory rescued the United States from a general war with all the Indians north-west of the Ohio. The Six Nations had discovered a restless uneasy temper; and the interposition of the President, to prevent a settlement which Pennsylvania was about to make at Presqueisle, seemed rather to suspend the commencement of hostilities, than to establish permanent pacific dispositions among those tribes. The battle of the 20th of August, however, had an immediate effect; and the clouds which had been long gathering in that quarter, were instantly dissipated.

This timely victory saved the United States from a full-blown war with all the Native American tribes northwest of the Ohio River. The Six Nations had shown a restless and uneasy attitude, and the President's intervention to stop a settlement that Pennsylvania was about to establish at Presque Isle seemed to just delay the start of hostilities rather than establish lasting peace among those tribes. However, the battle on August 20 had an immediate impact, and the tensions that had been building in that area quickly cleared up.

In the south too, its influence was felt. In that quarter, the inhabitants of Georgia and the Indians seemed equally disposed to war. Scarcely was the feeble authority of the government competent to restrain the aggressions of the former, or the dread of its force sufficient to repress those of the latter. In this doubtful state of things, the effect of a victory could not be inconsiderable.

In the south, its influence was also noticeable. There, the people of Georgia and the Native Americans appeared equally ready for conflict. The weak power of the government struggled to control the actions of the Georgians, while the fear of its strength was not enough to deter the Native Americans. In this uncertain situation, the impact of a victory could be significant.

About this time, the seditious and violent resistance to the execution of the law imposing duties on spirits distilled within the United States, had advanced to a point in the counties of Pennsylvania lying west of the Alleghany mountains, which required the decisive interposition of government.

About this time, the rebellious and violent opposition to the law that imposed duties on spirits distilled within the United States had escalated to a level in the counties of Pennsylvania west of the Allegheny Mountains that demanded decisive action from the government.

Insurrection in the Western parts of Pennsylvania.

Notwithstanding the multiplied outrages committed on the persons and property of the revenue officers, and of those who seemed willing to submit to the law, yet, in consequence of a steady adherence to the system of counteraction adopted by the executive, it was visibly gaining ground, and several distillers in the disaffected country were induced to comply with its requisites. The opinion, that the persevering efforts of the administration would ultimately prevail, derived additional support from the passage of an act by the present congress, containing those provisions which had been suggested by the chief of the treasury department. The progress of this bill, which became a law on the fifth of June, could not have been unknown to the malcontents, nor could its probable operation have been misunderstood. They perceived that the certain loss of a market for the article, added to the penalties to which delinquents were liable, might gradually induce a compliance on the part of distillers, unless they could, by a systematic and organized opposition, deprive the government of the means it employed for carrying the law into execution.

Despite the numerous attacks on the revenue officers and those willing to follow the law, the consistent dedication to the opposing strategy by the government was clearly making progress. Several distillers in the troubled area began to comply with its requirements. The belief that the administration's persistent efforts would eventually succeed gained further strength with the passing of a law by the current congress, which included provisions suggested by the head of the treasury department. The advancement of this bill, which became law on June 5th, wouldn’t have gone unnoticed by the dissenters, nor would they have misunderstood its likely effects. They realized that the guaranteed loss of a market for their product, combined with the penalties for noncompliance, could gradually push distillers to comply—unless they could, through organized and systematic resistance, deny the government the tools it needed to enforce the law.

On the part of the executive, this open defiance of the laws, and of the authority of the government, was believed imperiously to require, that the strength and efficacy of those laws should be tried. Against the perpetrators of some of the outrages which had been committed, bills of indictment had been found in a court of the United States, upon which process was directed to issue; and at the same time, process was also issued against a great number of non-complying distillers.

On the part of the executive, this blatant defiance of the laws and the authority of the government was seen as urgently needing a test of the strength and effectiveness of those laws. Indictments had been filed in a U.S. court against those responsible for some of the offenses that had occurred, and orders were also issued against a large number of non-compliant distillers.

The marshal repaired in person to the country which was the scene of these disorders, for the purpose of serving the processes. On the 15th of July, while in the execution of his duty, he was beset on the road by a body of armed men, who fired on him, but fortunately did him no personal injury. At daybreak, the ensuing morning, a party attacked the house of General Nevil, the inspector; but he defended himself resolutely, and obliged the assailants to retreat.

The marshal went personally to the area where these disturbances were happening to serve the legal documents. On July 15th, while carrying out his duties, he was ambushed on the road by a group of armed men who shot at him, but fortunately, he was not harmed. Early the next morning, a group attacked General Nevil’s house, the inspector; however, he defended himself bravely and forced the attackers to retreat.

Knowing well that this attack had been preconcerted, and apprehending that it would be repeated, he applied to the militia officers and magistrates of the county for protection. The answer was, that "owing to the too general combination of the people to oppose the revenue system, the laws could not be executed so as to afford him protection: that should the posse comitatus be ordered out to support the civil authority, they would favour the party of the rioters."

Knowing that this attack had been planned in advance and fearing it would happen again, he reached out to the militia officers and county magistrates for protection. Their response was that "due to the widespread opposition to the revenue system, the laws couldn't be enforced in a way that would provide him protection: that if the posse comitatus were called out to support the civil authority, they would side with the rioters."

On the succeeding day, the insurgents re-assembled to the number of about five hundred, to renew their attack on the house of the inspector. That officer, finding that no protection could be afforded by the civil authority, had applied to the commanding officer at Fort Pitt, and had obtained a detachment of eleven men from that garrison, who were joined by Major Kirkpatrick. Successful resistance to so great a force being obviously impracticable, a parley took place, at which the assailants, after requiring that the inspector[26] and all his papers should be delivered up, demanded that the party in the house should march out and ground their arms. This being refused, the parley terminated, and the assault commenced. The action lasted until the assailants set fire to several adjacent buildings, the heat from which was so intense that the house could no longer be occupied. From this cause, and from the apprehension that the fire would soon be communicated to the main building, Major Kirkpatrick and his party surrendered themselves.

The next day, the insurgents gathered again, numbering about five hundred, to renew their attack on the inspector's house. The inspector, realizing that civil authorities couldn’t provide any protection, reached out to the commanding officer at Fort Pitt and got a detachment of eleven men from that garrison, who were joined by Major Kirkpatrick. Since it was clearly impossible to successfully resist such a large force, a parley took place. During this talk, the attackers insisted that the inspector[26] and all his documents be handed over, and they demanded that everyone in the house come out and lay down their arms. When this was refused, the parley ended, and the assault began. The fighting continued until the attackers set fire to several nearby buildings, and the heat became so intense that the house was no longer tenable. Because of this, and fearing the fire would soon reach the main building, Major Kirkpatrick and his party surrendered.

The marshal and Colonel Pressly Nevil were seized on their way to General Nevil's house, and detained until two the next morning. The marshal, especially, was treated with extreme rudeness. His life was frequently threatened, and was probably saved by the interposition of some leading individuals who possessed more humanity, or more prudence, than those with whom they were associated. He could obtain his liberty only by entering into a solemn engagement, which was guaranteed by Colonel Nevil, to serve no more process on the western side of the Alleghany mountains.

The marshal and Colonel Pressly Nevil were captured while heading to General Nevil's house and held until two the next morning. The marshal, in particular, was treated very rudely. His life was often threatened, and he was likely saved by the intervention of some prominent individuals who had more compassion or wisdom than those they were with. He could only secure his freedom by agreeing to a formal commitment, which Colonel Nevil backed, to not serve any more process on the western side of the Allegheny Mountains.

The marshal and inspector having both retired to Pittsburg, the insurgents deputed two of their body, one of whom was a justice of the peace, to demand that the former should surrender all his process, and that the latter should resign his office; threatening, in case of refusal, to attack the place, and seize their persons. These demands were not acceded to; but Pittsburg affording no security, these officers escaped from the danger which threatened them, by descending the Ohio; after which, they found their way by a circuitous route to the seat of government.

The marshal and inspector had both gone to Pittsburgh, so the insurgents sent two of their members, one of whom was a justice of the peace, to demand that the marshal turn over all his documents and that the inspector resign. They threatened to attack the area and capture them if they refused. Their demands were not accepted, but since Pittsburgh was unsafe, both officers escaped the looming threat by traveling down the Ohio River. Afterward, they took a roundabout way to reach the seat of government.

The perpetrators of these treasonable practices, being desirous to ascertain their strength, and to discover any latent enemies who might remain unsuspected in the bosom of the disaffected country, despatched a party which stopped the mail from Pittsburg to Philadelphia, cut it open, and took out the letters which it contained. In some of these letters, a direct disapprobation of the violent measures which had been adopted was avowed; and in others, expressions were used which indicated unfriendly dispositions towards them. Upon acquiring this intelligence, delegates were deputed from the town of Washington to Pittsburg, where the writers of the offensive letters resided, to demand the banishment of the offenders. A prompt obedience to this demand was unavoidable; and the inhabitants of Pittsburg, who were convened on the occasion, engaged to attend a general meeting of the people, who were to assemble the next day in Braddock's field, in order to carry into effect such further measures as might be deemed adviseable with respect to the excise and its friends. They also determined to elect delegates to a convention which was to meet, on the 14th of August, at Parkinson's ferry. The avowed motives to these outrages were to compel the resignation of all officers engaged in the collection of the duties on distilled spirits; to withstand by force of arms the authority of the United States; and thereby to extort a repeal of the law imposing those duties, and an alteration in the conduct of government.

The people behind these treasonous acts wanted to gauge their support and find any hidden enemies that might be lurking in the discontented areas of the country. They sent a group to stop the mail from Pittsburgh to Philadelphia, opened it up, and took the letters inside. In some letters, the writers openly criticized the aggressive actions that had been taken, while in others, there were signs of hostility towards those actions. After getting this information, delegates were sent from Washington to Pittsburgh, where the authors of the troubling letters lived, to demand that the wrongdoers be expelled. The residents of Pittsburgh, gathered for this purpose, agreed to attend a general meeting the next day at Braddock's Field to discuss further actions regarding the tax and its supporters. They also decided to elect delegates for a convention that would meet on August 14th at Parkinson's Ferry. The stated reasons for these actions were to force all officials involved in collecting taxes on distilled spirits to resign; to actively resist the authority of the United States; and ultimately to demand a repeal of the law imposing those taxes and changes in government policies.

Affidavits attesting this serious state of things were laid before the President.

Affidavits confirming this serious situation were presented to the President.

The opposition had now reached to a point which seemed to forbid the continuance of a temporizing system. The efforts at conciliation, which, for more than three years, the government had persisted to make, and the alterations repeatedly introduced into the act for the purpose of rendering it less exceptionable, instead of diminishing the arrogance of those who opposed their will to the sense of the nation, had drawn forth sentiments indicative of designs much deeper than the evasion of a single act. The execution of the laws had at length been resisted by open force, and a determination to persevere in these measures was unequivocally avowed. The alternative of subduing this resistance, or of submitting to it was presented to the government.

The opposition had now reached a point that seemed to rule out any more attempts at compromise. The government had been trying to reconcile for over three years, making changes to the law to make it more acceptable, but instead of reducing the defiance of those who opposed the will of the nation, it highlighted attitudes that suggested intentions far beyond just avoiding one law. The enforcement of the laws had finally been met with outright defiance, and there was a clear resolve to continue these actions. The government now faced the choice of either overcoming this resistance or yielding to it.

The act of congress which provided for calling forth the militia "to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions," required as a pre-requisite to the exercise of this power, "that an associate justice, or the judge of the district, should certify that the laws of the United States were opposed, or their execution obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals." In the same act it was provided, "that if the militia of the state, where such combinations may happen, shall refuse, or be insufficient, to suppress the same, the President may employ the militia of other states."

The act of Congress that allowed for calling up the militia "to enforce the laws of the union, put down uprisings, and defend against invasions" required, as a prerequisite for using this power, "that an associate justice or the district judge certify that the laws of the United States were being challenged or that their enforcement was being hindered by groups too strong to be handled through normal judicial processes or by the authorities granted to the marshals." The same act stated, "that if the militia of the state where such groups arise refuse to act or are inadequate to deal with the situation, the President may use the militia from other states."

The evidence which had been transmitted to the President was laid before one of the associate justices, who gave the certificate, which enabled the chief magistrate to employ the militia in aid of the civil power.

The evidence that had been sent to the President was presented to one of the associate justices, who issued the certificate that allowed the chief magistrate to call in the militia to support the civil authority.

The executive being now authorized to adopt such measures as the crisis might require, the subject was again seriously considered in the cabinet; and the governor of Pennsylvania was also consulted respecting it. To avoid military coercion, if obedience to the laws could be produced by other means, was the universal wish; and therefore, all concurred in advising the appointment of commissioners from the governments of both the union, and the state, who should warn the deluded insurgents of the impending danger, and should convey a full pardon for past offences, upon the condition of future submission. But, respecting ulterior and eventual measures, a difference of opinion prevailed. The act already mentioned, made it the duty of the President, previous to the employment of military force, to issue his proclamation, commanding the insurgents to disperse within a limited time. The secretary of state (and the governor of Pennsylvania is understood to have concurred with him) was of opinion, that this conciliatory mission should be unaccompanied by any measure which might wear the appearance of coercion. He was alarmed at the strength of the insurgents, at their connexion with other parts of the country, at the extensive-ness of the prevailing discontents with the administration, and at the difficulty and expense of bringing the militia into the field. The governor of Pennsylvania having declared his opinion, that the militia of that state, who could be drawn forth, would be incompetent to enforce obedience, the aid of the neighbouring states would consequently be necessary. The secretary of state feared that the militia of the neighbouring states would refuse to march; and that, should he be mistaken in this, their compliance with the orders of the executive might be not less fatal than their disobedience. The introduction of a foreign militia into Pennsylvania might greatly increase the discontents prevailing in that state. His apprehensions of a failure, in the attempt to restore tranquillity by coercive means, were extreme; and the tremendous consequences of a failure were strongly depicted. From the highly inflamed state of parties, he anticipated a civil war, which would pervade the whole union, and drench every part of it with the blood of American citizens.

The executive was now authorized to take whatever actions the crisis required, so the cabinet seriously reconsidered the issue, and the governor of Pennsylvania was consulted as well. The common goal was to avoid military force if it could be avoided through other means, so everyone agreed to recommend appointing commissioners from both the federal and state governments. These commissioners would warn the misguided insurgents of the imminent danger and offer them a full pardon for past offenses, on the condition that they would submit in the future. However, there were differing opinions on what actions to take afterward. The previously mentioned act required the President, before using military force, to issue a proclamation demanding that the insurgents disperse within a specific timeframe. The Secretary of State (with the governor of Pennsylvania agreeing) believed this conciliatory mission should not involve any actions that might seem coercive. He was concerned about the strength of the insurgents, their connections to other regions, the widespread discontent with the administration, and the challenges and costs of deploying the militia. The governor of Pennsylvania expressed that the state's militia would not be adequate to enforce compliance, meaning assistance from neighboring states would be necessary. The Secretary of State worried that those militias might refuse to deploy and that if he were wrong, their obedience to the executive's orders could be just as dangerous as defiance. Bringing in a foreign militia to Pennsylvania might worsen the existing discontent in that state. He had serious fears about failing to restore order through coercion, and he vividly imagined the disastrous consequences of such a failure. Given the highly charged political climate, he anticipated a civil war that would sweep across the entire country, saturating it with the blood of American citizens.

The secretary of the treasury, the secretary of war, and the attorney general, were of opinion that the President was bound by the most high and solemn obligations to employ the force which the legislature had placed at his disposal, for the suppression of a criminal and unprovoked insurrection. The case contemplated by congress had clearly occurred; and the President was urged by considerations the most awful, to perform the duty imposed on him by the constitution, of providing "that the laws be faithfully executed." The long forbearance of government, and its patient endeavours to recall the deluded people to a sense of their duty and interest by appeals to their reason, had produced only increase of violence, and a more determined opposition. Perseverance in that system could only give a more extensive range to disaffection, and multiply the dangers resulting from it.

The Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of War, and the Attorney General believed that the President had a serious and urgent obligation to use the power that Congress had given him to put down a criminal and unprovoked uprising. The situation Congress had anticipated had clearly happened, and the President was pressed by the most serious considerations to carry out the duty assigned to him by the Constitution to ensure that "the laws are faithfully executed." The government's prolonged patience and efforts to convince the misguided people to recognize their responsibilities and interests through rational appeals had only led to more violence and stronger opposition. Continuing with that approach would only expand the discontent and increase the resulting dangers.

Those who were of opinion that the occasion demanded a full trial of the ability of the government to enforce obedience to the laws, were also of opinion, that policy and humanity equally dictated the employment of a force which would render resistance desperate. The insurgent country contained sixteen thousand men able to bear arms; and the computation was, that they could bring seven thousand into the field. If the army of the government should amount to twelve thousand men, it would present an imposing force which the insurgents would not venture to meet.

Those who believed that the situation called for a thorough test of the government's ability to enforce the law also felt that both strategy and compassion suggested using a force that would make resistance futile. The rebel region had sixteen thousand men capable of fighting, and it was estimated that they could muster seven thousand in battle. If the government's army reached twelve thousand men, it would pose a significant force that the insurgents would be unlikely to confront.

It was impossible that the President could hesitate to embrace the latter of these opinions. That a government entrusted to him should be trampled under foot by a lawless section of the union, which set at defiance the will of the nation, as expressed by its representatives, was an abasement to which neither his judgment nor his feelings could submit. He resolved, therefore, to issue the proclamation, which, by law, was to precede the employment of force.

It was unthinkable that the President would hesitate to accept the latter opinion. The idea that a government under his leadership could be overrun by a lawless faction within the union, openly defying the nation's will as expressed by its representatives, was something his judgment and feelings could not tolerate. He decided, therefore, to issue the proclamation, which by law needed to come before using force.

On the same day, a requisition was made on the governors of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia, for their several quotas of militia to compose an army of twelve thousand[27] men; who were to be immediately organized, and prepared to march at a minute's warning.

On the same day, a request was sent to the governors of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Virginia for their respective quotas of militia to form an army of twelve thousand[27] men; who were to be organized right away and ready to march on short notice.

While steps were taking to bring this force into the field, a last essay was made to render its employment unnecessary. Three distinguished and popular citizens of Pennsylvania were deputed by the government to be the bearers of a general amnesty for past offences, on the sole condition of future obedience to the laws.

While steps were being taken to deploy this force, a final attempt was made to make its use unnecessary. Three prominent and well-liked citizens of Pennsylvania were appointed by the government to deliver a general amnesty for past offenses, on the sole condition of future compliance with the laws.

It having been deemed adviseable that the executive of the state should act in concert with that of the United States, Governor Mifflin also issued a proclamation, and appointed commissioners to act with those of the general government.

It was decided that the state's executive should work together with the United States, so Governor Mifflin also issued a proclamation and appointed commissioners to cooperate with those from the federal government.

Meanwhile, the insurgents omitted nothing which might enlarge the circle of disaffection. Attempts were made to embark the adjacent counties of Virginia in their cause, and their violence was extended to Morgantown, at which place an inspector resided, who saved himself by flight, and protected his property by advertising on his own door that he had resigned his office. They also made similar excursions into the contiguous counties of Pennsylvania, lying east of the Alleghany mountains, where numbers were ready to join them. These deluded men, giving too much faith to the publications of democratic societies, and to the furious sentiments of general hostility to the administration, and particularly to the internal taxes, with which the papers in the opposition abounded, seem to have entertained the opinion, that the great body of the people were ready to take up arms against their government, and that the resistance commenced by them would spread throughout the union, and terminate in a revolution.

Meanwhile, the insurgents did everything they could to increase public dissatisfaction. They tried to get neighboring counties in Virginia to join their cause, and their violence reached Morgantown, where an inspector lived. He managed to escape and protected his property by posting a notice on his door stating that he had resigned from his position. They also made similar moves into the nearby counties of Pennsylvania, east of the Alleghany Mountains, where many were eager to support them. These misguided individuals placed too much trust in the statements from democratic societies and the heated anti-administration sentiments, particularly against the internal taxes that were heavily criticized in opposition newspapers. They seemed to believe that a large portion of the population was ready to rise up against their government, and that the resistance they started would spread across the nation, leading to a revolution.

The convention at Parkinson's ferry had appointed a committee of safety consisting of sixty members, who chose fifteen of their body to confer with the commissioners of the United States, and of the state of Pennsylvania. This committee of conference was not empowered to conclude on any thing. They could only receive and report the propositions which might be made to them.

The convention at Parkinson's ferry had set up a safety committee made up of sixty members, who picked fifteen from their group to meet with the commissioners from the United States and the state of Pennsylvania. This conference committee didn't have the authority to make any decisions. They could only receive and report back on any proposals that were presented to them.

Men of property and intelligence, who had contributed to kindle the flame under the common error of being able to regulate its heat, now trembled at the extent of the conflagration. It had passed the limits they had assigned to it, and was no longer subject to their control.

Men of wealth and intelligence, who had helped ignite the fire under the mistaken belief that they could regulate its intensity, now feared the scale of the blaze. It had gone beyond the boundaries they had set and was no longer under their control.

The committee of conference expressed themselves unanimously in favour of accepting the terms offered by the government, and exerted themselves in the committee of safety to obtain a decision to the same effect. In that committee, the question whether they would submit peaceably to the execution of the law, retaining expressly the privilege of using all constitutional means to effect its repeal, was debated with great zeal. The less violent party carried it by a small majority; but, not thinking themselves authorized to decide for their constituents on so momentous a question, they afterwards resolved that it should be referred to the people.

The conference committee unanimously agreed to accept the terms offered by the government and worked hard in the safety committee to get a decision in favor of that. In that committee, they passionately debated whether they would peacefully comply with the law while clearly retaining the right to use all constitutional methods to have it repealed. The less aggressive faction won by a narrow margin; however, feeling they weren’t authorized to decide such an important issue for their constituents, they later decided to refer it to the people.

This reference resulted in demonstrating that, though many were disposed to demean themselves peaceably, yet a vast mass of opposition remained, determined to obstruct the re-establishment of civil authority.

This reference showed that, while many were willing to behave peacefully, a large group still existed, determined to block the return of civil authority.

From some causes, among which was disaffection to the particular service, the prospect of bringing the quota of troops required from Pennsylvania into the field, was at first unpromising. But the assembly, which had been summoned by the governor to meet on the first of September, expressed in strong terms its abhorrence of this daring attempt to resist the laws, and to subvert the government of the country; and a degree of ardour and unanimity was displayed by the people of other states, which exceeded the hopes of the most sanguine friends of the administration. Some feeble attempts were indeed made to produce a disobedience to the requisition of the President, by declaring that the people would never be made the instruments of the secretary of the treasury to shed the blood of their fellow citizens; that the representatives of the people ought to be assembled before a civil war was commenced; and by avowing the extravagant opinion that the President could not lawfully call forth the militia of any other state, until actual experiment had ascertained the insufficiency of that of Pennsylvania. But these insidious suggestions were silenced by the general sense of the nation, which loudly and strongly proclaimed that the government and laws must be supported. The officers displayed an unexampled activity; and intelligence from every quarter gave full assurance that, with respect to both numbers and time, the requisitions of the President would be punctually observed.

Due to various reasons, including a lack of enthusiasm for the specific service, the outlook for recruiting the required number of troops from Pennsylvania was initially not hopeful. However, the assembly, called by the governor to meet on September 1st, expressed its strong opposition to this bold attempt to defy the laws and undermine the government. The level of passion and unity shown by the people in other states exceeded the expectations of even the most optimistic supporters of the administration. Some weak attempts were made to encourage disobedience to the President's request, claiming that the people wouldn't allow themselves to become tools of the Treasury Secretary to harm their fellow citizens; that the people's representatives should meet before any civil war began; and absurdly arguing that the President couldn't lawfully call the militia from any other state until it was proven that Pennsylvania's forces were inadequate. But these misleading suggestions were overwhelmed by the widespread belief across the nation that the government and laws must be upheld. The officers showed unprecedented energy, and reports from all directions confirmed that, in terms of both numbers and timing, the President's requests would be met promptly.

The governor of Pennsylvania compensated for the defects in the militia law of that state by his personal exertions. From some inadvertence, as was said, on the part of the brigade inspectors, the militia could not be drafted, and consequently the quota of Pennsylvania could be completed only by volunteers. The governor, who was endowed with a high degree of popular elocution, made a circuit through the lower counties of the state, and publicly addressed the militia, at different places where he had caused them to be assembled, on the crisis in the affairs of their country. So successful were these animating exhortations, that Pennsylvania was not behind her sister states in furnishing the quota required from her.

The governor of Pennsylvania made up for the weaknesses in the state's militia law through his personal efforts. Due to some oversight by the brigade inspectors, the militia couldn't be drafted, so Pennsylvania's quota could only be filled by volunteers. The governor, who was very skilled in public speaking, traveled to the lower counties of the state and spoke to the militia in various locations where he had gathered them, addressing the urgent situation in their country. His motivating speeches were so effective that Pennsylvania matched the contributions of her neighboring states in providing the required quota.

On the 25th of September, the President issued a second proclamation, describing in terms of great energy the obstinate and perverse spirit with which the lenient propositions of the government had been received; and declaring his fixed determination, in obedience to the high and irresistible duty consigned to him by the constitution, "to take care that the laws be faithfully executed," to reduce the refractory to obedience.

On September 25th, the President issued a second proclamation, passionately describing the stubborn and unreasonable attitude with which the government’s gentle proposals were met; and declaring his strong determination, in fulfilling the significant and unavoidable duty assigned to him by the constitution, "to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed," to bring the defiant back into line.

The troops of New Jersey and Pennsylvania were directed to rendezvous at Bedford, and those of Maryland and Virginia at Cumberland, on the Potomac.[28] The command of the expedition had been conferred on Governor Lee of Virginia; and the governors of New Jersey and Pennsylvania commanded the militia of their respective states under him.

The troops from New Jersey and Pennsylvania were ordered to meet at Bedford, while those from Maryland and Virginia were to gather at Cumberland on the Potomac.[28] Governor Lee of Virginia was put in charge of the expedition, and the governors of New Jersey and Pennsylvania led the militia from their states under his command.

The President, in person, visited each division of the army; but, being confident that the force employed must look down all resistance, he left the secretary of the treasury to accompany it, and returned himself to Philadelphia, where the approaching session of congress required his presence.

The President personally visited each division of the army; however, confident that the force deployed would easily overcome any resistance, he left the Secretary of the Treasury to accompany them and returned to Philadelphia, where he needed to be present for the upcoming session of Congress.

Quelled by the prompt and vigorous measures of the government.

From Cumberland and Bedford, the army marched in two divisions into the country of the insurgents. The greatness of the force prevented the effusion of blood. The disaffected did not venture to assemble in arms. Several of the leaders who had refused to give assurances of future submission to the laws were seized, and some of them detained for legal prosecution.

From Cumberland and Bedford, the army marched in two divisions into the territory of the rebels. The large size of the force stopped any bloodshed. The dissenters didn’t dare to gather with weapons. Several leaders who refused to promise future obedience to the laws were arrested, and some were held for legal prosecution.

But although no direct and open opposition was made, the spirit of insurrection was not subdued. A sour and malignant temper displayed itself, which indicated, but too plainly, that the disposition to resist had only sunk under the pressure of the great military force brought into the country, but would rise again should that force be withdrawn. It was, therefore, thought adviseable to station for the winter, a detachment to be commanded by Major General Morgan, in the centre of the disaffected country.

But even though there was no direct and open opposition, the mood of rebellion was still alive. A bitter and hostile attitude showed itself, clearly indicating that the willingness to resist had only been suppressed by the heavy military presence in the region, but would re-emerge if that force were to be removed. It was, therefore, deemed wise to assign a detachment led by Major General Morgan to the center of the troubled area for the winter.

Thus, without shedding a drop of blood, did the prudent vigour of the executive terminate an insurrection, which, at one time, threatened to shake the government of the United States to its foundation. That so perverse a spirit should have been excited in the bosom of prosperity, without the pressure of a single grievance, is among those political phenomena which occur not unfrequently in the course of human affairs, and which the statesman can never safely disregard. When real ills are felt, there is something positive and perceptible to which the judgment may be directed, the actual extent of which may be ascertained, and the cause of which may be discerned. But when the mind, inflamed by supposititious dangers, gives a full loose to the imagination, and fastens upon some object with which to disturb itself, the belief that the danger exists seems to become a matter of faith, with which reason combats in vain. Under a government emanating entirely from the people, and with an administration whose sole object was their happiness, the public mind was violently agitated with apprehensions of a powerful and secret combination against liberty, which was to discover itself by the total overthrow of the republican system. That those who were charged with these designs were as destitute of the means, as of the will to effect them, did not shake the firm belief of their existence. Disregarding the apparent partiality of the administration for France, so far as that partiality was compatible with an honest neutrality, the zealots of the day ascribed its incessant labours for the preservation of peace, to a temper hostile to the French republic; and, while themselves loudly imprecating the vengeance of heaven and earth on one of the belligerents, and openly rejoicing in the victories of the other; while impetuously rushing into a war with Britain, and pressing measures which would render accommodation impracticable; they attributed a system calculated to check them in this furious career, not to that genuine American spirit which produced it, but to an influence which, so far as opinions are to depend on facts, has at no time insinuated itself into the councils of the United States.

Thus, without shedding a drop of blood, the wise and determined actions of the government ended an uprising that once threatened to destabilize the United States. It's troubling that such a rebellious spirit could arise in a time of prosperity, without any real grievances, and this is one of those political phenomena that frequently occurs in human affairs and cannot be overlooked by politicians. When real problems are experienced, there's something concrete and visible that can be assessed, and its root causes can be identified. But when people's minds, fueled by imaginary threats, unleash their fantasies and latch onto something to upset them, the belief in such dangers can become a matter of faith, which reason struggles to counter. In a government entirely derived from the people, with an administration devoted to their happiness, the public was in turmoil, gripped by fears of a powerful and secret movement against liberty that was supposedly plotting the complete destruction of the republican system. The fact that those accused of these plans lacked both the means and the desire to carry them out did not shake the widespread belief in their existence. Overlooking the administration’s inclination towards France, as far as that inclination was compatible with genuine neutrality, the fervent advocates of the time attributed its relentless efforts to maintain peace to a mindset hostile to the French republic. Meanwhile, they openly called down the wrath of heaven and earth on one of the warring parties and celebrated the victories of the other; they rushed headlong into war with Britain and pushed for measures that would make peace impossible. They attributed the system that aimed to rein them in during this reckless rush, not to the true American spirit that inspired it, but to an influence that has never, based on facts, infiltrated the decision-making of the United States.

In popular governments, the resentments, the suspicions, and the disgusts, produced in the legislature by warm debate, and the chagrin of defeat; by the desire of gaining, or the fear of losing power; and which are created by personal views among the leaders of parties, will infallibly extend to the body of the nation. Not only will those causes of dissatisfaction be urged which really operate on the minds of intelligent men, but every instrument will be seized which can effect the purpose, and the passions will be inflamed by whatever may serve to irritate them. Among the multiplied evils generated by faction, it is perhaps not the least, that it has a tendency to abolish all distinction between virtue and vice; and to prostrate those barriers which the wise and good have erected for the protection of morals, and which are defended solely by opinion. The victory of the party becomes the great object; and, too often, all measures are deemed right or wrong, as they tend to promote or impede it. The attainment of the end is considered as the supreme good, and the detestable doctrine is adopted that the end will justify the means. The mind, habituated to the extenuation of acts of moral turpitude, becomes gradually contaminated, and loses that delicate sensibility which instinctively inspires horror for vice, and respect for virtue.

In popular governments, the resentments, suspicions, and disgust that arise in the legislature from intense debates and the frustration of losing; from the desire to gain or the fear of losing power; and from personal agendas among party leaders will inevitably spread to the general public. Not only will the real sources of dissatisfaction be highlighted that affect the thoughts of informed individuals, but every tool will be used to achieve the goal, and emotions will be stirred up by anything that can provoke them. Among the numerous problems created by factions, perhaps one of the worst is that it tends to blur the lines between right and wrong and to break down the barriers that wise and good people have put in place to uphold morals, which are supported only by public opinion. Winning the party becomes the top priority; too often, actions are seen as either right or wrong depending on whether they help or hinder that goal. Achieving the result is regarded as the ultimate good, and the unacceptable idea is embraced that the end justifies the means. The mind, accustomed to downplaying morally corrupt actions, gradually becomes tainted and loses the sensitivity that instinctively provokes disgust for wrongdoing and respect for what is right.

In the intemperate abuse which was cast on the principal measures of the government, and on those who supported them; in the violence with which the discontents of the opponents to those measures were expressed; and especially in the denunciations which were uttered against them by the democratic societies; the friends of the administration searched for the causes of that criminal attempt which had been made in the western parts of Pennsylvania, to oppose the will of the nation by force of arms. Had those misguided men believed that this opposition was to be confined within their own narrow limits, they could not have been so mad, or so weak as to have engaged in it.

In the extreme criticism directed at the main policies of the government and those who supported them; in the aggressive way the opponents expressed their dissatisfaction; and especially in the harsh attacks made against them by democratic groups; the administration's supporters looked for reasons behind the violent attempt in western Pennsylvania to forcefully oppose the will of the nation. If those misguided individuals had thought this opposition would stay within their own limited boundaries, they wouldn't have been so reckless or foolish to involve themselves in it.

The ideas of the President on this subject were freely given to several of his confidential friends. "The real people" he said, "occasionally assembled in order to express their sentiments on political subjects, ought never to be confounded with permanent self-appointed societies, usurping the right to control the constituted authorities, and to dictate to public opinion. While the former was entitled to respect, the latter was incompatible with all government, and must either sink into general disesteem, or finally overturn the established order of things."

The President shared his thoughts on this topic openly with a few of his trusted friends. "The real people," he said, "sometimes gather to share their views on political issues and should never be mistaken for permanent self-appointed groups that take it upon themselves to control the official authorities and dictate public opinion. While the former deserves respect, the latter is at odds with all forms of government and will either fall into public disfavor or ultimately disrupt the established order."

Meeting of congress.

In his speech, at the opening of congress, the President detailed at considerable length the progress of opposition to the laws, the means employed both by the legislature and executive to appease the discontents which had been fomented,[29] and the measures which he had finally taken to reduce the refractory to submission.

In his speech at the start of congress, the President explained in great detail the progress of opposition to the laws, the tactics used by both the legislature and executive to calm the unrest that had been stirred up,[29] and the actions he ultimately took to bring the defiant into line.

As Commander-in-chief of the militia when called into actual service, he had, he said, visited the places of general rendezvous, to obtain more correct information, and to direct a plan for ulterior movements. Had there been room for a persuasion that the laws were secure from obstruction, he should have caught with avidity at the opportunity of restoring the militia to their families and homes. But succeeding intelligence had tended to manifest the necessity of what had been done, it being now confessed by those who were not inclined to exaggerate the ill conduct of the insurgents, that their malevolence was not pointed merely to a particular law; but that a spirit inimical to all order had actuated many of the offenders.

As Commander-in-Chief of the militia when called into actual service, he stated that he had visited the main gathering spots to get better information and to plan for future actions. If there had been any belief that the laws were safe from interference, he would have eagerly taken the chance to send the militia back to their families and homes. However, recent information had made it clear that his actions were necessary, as even those who weren't prone to exaggerate the poor behavior of the rebels now admitted that their anger wasn’t focused on just one law; instead, a general hostility towards all order motivated many of the offenders.

After bestowing a high encomium on the alacrity and promptitude with which persons in every station had come forward to assert the dignity of the laws, thereby furnishing an additional proof that they understood the true principles of government and liberty, and felt their inseparable union; he added—

After praising the enthusiasm and readiness with which people from all walks of life stepped up to uphold the dignity of the laws, providing further evidence that they grasped the true principles of government and freedom, and recognized their inseparable connection; he added—

Democratic societies.

"To every description indeed of citizens, let praise be given. But let them persevere in their affectionate vigilance over that precious depository of American happiness,—the constitution of the United States. And when in the calm moments of reflection, they shall have retraced the origin and progress of the insurrection, let them determine whether it has not been fomented by combinations of men, who, careless of consequences, and disregarding the unerring truth that those who rouse can not always appease a civil convulsion, have disseminated, from an ignorance or perversion of facts, suspicions, jealousies, and accusations of the whole government."

"Let’s give praise to every type of citizen. But they should keep being lovingly watchful over the invaluable source of American happiness—the Constitution of the United States. And when they take the time to reflect on the beginnings and development of the uprising, they should consider whether it hasn’t been stirred up by groups of people who, ignoring the consequences and the undeniable truth that those who instigate cannot always calm a civil upheaval, have spread doubts, jealousy, and accusations against the entire government, either out of ignorance or a distortion of the facts."

The President could not omit this fair occasion, once more to press on congress a subject which had always been near his heart. After mentioning the defectiveness of the existing system, he said—

The President couldn't miss this opportunity to urge Congress again on a topic that had always been important to him. After noting the shortcomings of the current system, he said—

"The devising and establishing of a well regulated militia, would be a genuine source of legislative honour, and a perfect title to public gratitude. I therefore entertain a hope that the present session will not pass without carrying to its full energy the power of organizing, arming, and disciplining the militia; and thus providing, in the language of the constitution, for calling them forth to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions."

"The creation and establishment of a well-regulated militia would be a true source of legislative honor and a solid reason for public gratitude. I thus hope that this session does not end without fully empowering the organization, arming, and training of the militia; thereby ensuring, in the words of the Constitution, that they can be called upon to enforce the laws of the union, put down rebellions, and defend against invasions."

After mentioning the intelligence from the army under the command of General Wayne, and the state of Indian affairs, he again called the attention of the house of representatives to a subject scarcely less interesting than a system of defence against external and internal violence.

After bringing up the intelligence from the army led by General Wayne and the situation with the Native American tribes, he once again directed the House of Representatives' attention to a topic that was almost as important as creating a defense system against both external and internal threats.

"The time," he said, "which has elapsed since the commencement of our fiscal measures, has developed our pecuniary resources, so as to open the way for a definitive plan for the redemption of the public debt. It is believed that the result is such as to encourage congress to consummate this work without delay. Nothing can more promote the permanent welfare of the union, and nothing would be more grateful to our constituents. Indeed, whatever is unfinished of our system of public credit, can not be benefited by procrastination; and, as far as may be practicable, we ought to place that credit on grounds which can not be disturbed, and to prevent that progressive accumulation of debt which must ultimately endanger all governments."

"The time," he said, "that has passed since we started our financial measures has really developed our financial resources, allowing us to create a solid plan to pay off the public debt. It's believed that the outcome will encourage Congress to finalize this task without delay. Nothing can better support the long-term well-being of the union, and nothing would be more appreciated by our constituents. In fact, any unfinished aspects of our public credit system won’t benefit from delay; and as much as possible, we should establish that credit on a stable foundation and prevent the ongoing buildup of debt that could ultimately threaten all governments."

He referred to subsequent communications for certain circumstances attending the intercourse of the United States with foreign nations. "However," he added, "it may not be unseasonable to announce that my policy in our foreign transactions has been, to cultivate peace with all the world; to observe treaties with pure and inviolate faith; to check every deviation from the line of impartiality; to explain what may have been misapprehended; and correct what may have been injurious to any nation; and having thus acquired the right, to lose no time in acquiring the ability, to insist upon justice being done to ourselves."

He referred to later communications for specific situations related to the United States' interactions with other countries. "However," he added, "it might be a good time to state that my policy regarding our foreign affairs has been to promote peace with everyone; to uphold treaties with absolute integrity; to address any deviations from neutrality; to clarify any misunderstandings; and to remedy anything that may have harmed any nation. By doing this, we can establish our right and promptly work on our ability to demand that justice is served for us."

In the senate, an answer was reported which contained the following clause:

In the Senate, a response was reported that included the following clause:

"Our anxiety, arising from the licentious and open resistance to the laws in the western counties of Pennsylvania, has been increased by the proceedings of certain self-created societies relative to the laws and administration of the government; proceedings, in our apprehension, founded in political error, calculated, if not intended, to disorganize our government, and which, by inspiring delusive hopes of support, have been instrumental in misleading our fellow citizens in the scene of insurrection."

"Our anxiety, stemming from the reckless and blatant defiance of the laws in the western counties of Pennsylvania, has been amplified by the actions of certain self-appointed groups regarding the laws and governance; actions that we believe are based on political misunderstandings, intended, if not aimed, at disrupting our government, and which, by creating false hopes of support, have played a significant role in misleading our fellow citizens during the insurrection."

The address proceeded to express the most decided approbation of the conduct of the President in relation to the insurgents; and, after noticing the different parts of the speech, concluded with saying—

The address went on to show strong support for the President's actions concerning the insurgents; and after discussing various parts of the speech, it wrapped up by saying—

"At a period so momentous in the affairs of nations, the temperate, just, and firm policy that you have pursued in respect to foreign powers, has been eminently calculated to promote the great and essential interest of our country, and has created the fairest title to the public gratitude and thanks."

"During such a significant time in global affairs, the fair, just, and steady approach you've taken towards foreign powers has been particularly well-suited to advance the vital interests of our country, and has earned you the deepest gratitude and appreciation from the public."

To this unequivocal approbation of the policy adopted by the executive with regard to foreign nations, no objections were made. The clause respecting democratic societies was seriously opposed; but the party in favour of the administration had been strengthened in the senate by recent events, and the address reported by the committee was agreed to without alteration.

To this clear approval of the policy the administration adopted towards foreign countries, no objections were raised. The section about democratic societies faced strong opposition; however, the party supporting the administration had gained strength in the senate due to recent events, and the address reported by the committee was accepted without changes.

The same spirit did not prevail in the house of representatives. In that branch of the legislature, the opposition party continued to be the most powerful, and the respect of their leaders for the person and character of the chief magistrate was visibly diminishing. His interference with a favourite system was not forgotten, and the mission of Mr. Jay still rankled in their bosoms.

The same attitude was not present in the House of Representatives. In that part of the legislature, the opposing party remained the most influential, and their leaders' respect for the person and character of the chief executive was clearly fading. His meddling with a favored system was not overlooked, and Mr. Jay's mission still stung their pride.

The address prepared by the committee, to whom the speech was referred, omitted to notice those parts which respected self created societies, the victory of General Wayne, and the policy observed by the executive in its intercourse with foreign nations. On a motion being made by Mr. Dayton to amend it, by inserting a clause which should express the satisfaction of the house at the success of the army under General Wayne, Mr. Madison said, that it had been the wish of the committee who framed the address, to avoid the minutia of the speech: but as a desire was manifested to amplify particular parts, it might not be amiss to glance at the policy observed towards foreign nations. He therefore moved to amend the amendment by adding the words, "solicitous also as we are for the preservation of peace with all nations, we can not otherwise than warmly approve of a policy in our foreign transactions, which keeps in view as well the maintenance of our national rights, as the continuance of that blessing." Mr. Hillhouse wished the word your to be substituted for the article a, that the answer might point, not to an abstract policy, but to that of the executive, and thus have a direct application to the speech. This motion produced a warm discussion, which terminated in a request that Mr. Madison would withdraw his amendment; the friends of the administration being of opinion, that it was more eligible to pass over that part of the speech in silence, than to answer it in terms so equivocal as those to which alone the house seemed willing to assent.

The address prepared by the committee, to whom the speech was referred, didn't mention the aspects related to self-created societies, General Wayne's victory, or the executive's policy regarding foreign relations. When Mr. Dayton proposed an amendment to include a statement expressing the house's satisfaction with the army's success under General Wayne, Mr. Madison explained that the committee aimed to avoid getting too detailed in the speech. However, since there was interest in expanding certain parts, he suggested it might be beneficial to briefly touch on the policy towards foreign nations. He then moved to amend the amendment by adding the phrase, "also concerned as we are for the preservation of peace with all nations, we can only wholeheartedly approve of a policy in our foreign dealings that considers both the protection of our national rights and the continuation of that blessing." Mr. Hillhouse proposed replacing the word a with your so the statement would refer specifically to the executive's policy and not just an abstract concept, making it directly relevant to the speech. This proposal led to a heated debate, which ended with a request for Mr. Madison to withdraw his amendment, as supporters of the administration believed it would be better to leave that part of the speech unaddressed rather than respond with language as ambiguous as what the house seemed ready to accept.

A proposition was then made by Mr. Fitzsimmons to introduce into the address, a clause declaring, that "in tracing the origin and progress of the insurrection, they (the house of representatives) entertain no doubt that certain self created societies and combinations of men, careless of consequences, and disregarding truth, by disseminating suspicions, jealousies, and accusations of the government, have had an influence in fomenting this daring outrage against the principles of social order, and the authority of the laws."

A suggestion was then put forward by Mr. Fitzsimmons to add a statement to the address, declaring that "in looking into the cause and development of the uprising, they (the House of Representatives) have no doubt that certain self-established groups and alliances, indifferent to the consequences and ignoring the truth, have influenced this bold attack on the principles of social order and the authority of the laws by spreading suspicions, jealousies, and accusations against the government."

This attempt to censure certain organized assemblages of factious individuals, who, under the imposing garb of watchfulness over liberty, concealed designs subversive of all those principles which preserve the order, the peace, and the happiness of society, was resisted by the whole force of the opposition. A very eloquent and animated debate ensued, which terminated in the committee, by striking out the words "self created societies;" forty-seven voting for, and forty-five against expunging them. The question was resumed in the house; and, the chairman of the committee being opposed in sentiment to the speaker, who was now placed in the chair, the majority was precisely changed, and the words were reinstated. This victory, however, if it may be termed one, was soon lost. A motion for confining the censure to societies and combinations within the four western counties of Pennsylvania and the adjacent country, succeeded by the casting vote of the speaker, upon which, the friends of the amendment gave it up, and the address was voted without expressing any sentiment on the subject.

This effort to criticize certain organized groups of rebellious individuals, who, under the guise of watching over freedom, hid plans that undermined all the principles that maintain order, peace, and happiness in society, faced strong resistance from the opposition. A lively and passionate debate followed, resulting in the committee removing the term "self-created societies," with forty-seven votes in favor and forty-five against. The question was brought back to the house, and since the committee chairman had a different opinion from the speaker, who was now presiding, the vote shifted, and the terms were reinstated. However, this so-called victory was short-lived. A motion to limit the criticism to societies and groups within the four western counties of Pennsylvania and the surrounding area passed with the speaker's tie-breaking vote, which led the supporters of the amendment to back down, and the address was approved without any expression of opinion on the matter.

This triumph over the administration revived, for a moment, the drooping energies of these pernicious societies. But it was only for a moment. The agency ascribed to them by the opinion of the public, as well as of the President, in producing an insurrection which was generally execrated, had essentially affected them; and while languishing under this wound, they received a deadly blow from a quarter whence hostility was least expected.

This victory over the administration briefly boosted the fading spirits of these harmful groups. But it was only for a brief moment. The public and the President's perception of their role in sparking a rebellion that was widely condemned deeply impacted them; and while they were still suffering from this blow, they received a fatal hit from an unexpected source of hostility.

The remnant of the French convention, rendered desperate by the ferocious despotism of the Jacobins, and of the sanguinary tyrant who had made himself their chief; perceiving that the number of victims who were immolated as his caprice might suggest, instead of satiating, could only stimulate his appetite for blood, had, at length, sought for safety by boldly confronting danger; and, succeeding in a desperate attempt to bring Robespierre to the guillotine, had terminated his reign of terror. The colossean power of the clubs, which had been abused to an excess that gives to faithful history the appearance of fiction, fell with that of their favourite member, and they sunk into long merited disgrace. The means by which their political influence had been maintained were wrested from them; and, in a short time, their meetings were prohibited. Not more certain is it that the boldest streams must disappear, if the fountains which fed them be emptied, than was the dissolution of the democratic societies of America, when the Jacobin clubs were denounced by France. As if their destinies depended on the same thread, the political death of the former was the unerring signal for that of the latter; and their expiring struggles, incapable of deferring their fate, only attested the reluctance with which they surrendered their much abused power.

The remnants of the French convention, pushed to desperation by the brutal control of the Jacobins and the bloody tyrant who had made himself their leader, realized that the number of victims sacrificed at his whim didn’t satisfy him but only fueled his craving for violence. Eventually, they sought safety by bravely facing danger and succeeded in a desperate attempt to bring Robespierre to the guillotine, ending his reign of terror. The massive power of the clubs, which had been misused to such an extent that it makes true history seem like fiction, collapsed along with their favorite member, and they fell into well-deserved disgrace. The ways they had maintained their political influence were taken from them, and soon their meetings were banned. Just as it's certain that the strongest streams will disappear if the sources that feed them run dry, the democratic societies of America dissolved when the Jacobin clubs were condemned by France. It was as if their fates were linked; the political death of one signaled the inevitable demise of the other. Their final struggles, unable to change their fate, only showed how unwilling they were to give up their highly abused power.

Notwithstanding the disagreement between the executive and one branch of the legislature concerning self created societies, and the policy observed towards foreign nations, the speech of the President was treated with marked respect; and the several subjects which it recommended, engaged the immediate attention of congress. A bill was passed authorizing the President to station a detachment of militia in the four western counties of Pennsylvania; provision was made to compensate those whose property had been destroyed by the insurgents, should those who had committed the injury be unable to repair it: and an appropriation exceeding one million one hundred thousand dollars was made to defray the expenses occasioned by the insurrection.

Despite the disagreement between the executive branch and one part of the legislature regarding self-created societies and the approach towards foreign nations, the President's speech was treated with significant respect. The various topics he recommended received the immediate attention of Congress. A bill was passed allowing the President to place a group of militia in the four western counties of Pennsylvania. Provisions were made to compensate those whose property had been damaged by the insurgents if the offenders were unable to make repairs. An allocation of over one million one hundred thousand dollars was made to cover the expenses caused by the insurrection.

Many of the difficulties which had occurred in drawing out the militia were removed, and a bill was introduced to give greater energy to the militia system generally; but this subject possessed so many intrinsic difficulties, that the session passed away without effecting any thing respecting it.

Many of the challenges faced in organizing the militia were addressed, and a bill was proposed to strengthen the militia system overall; however, this issue had so many inherent complexities that the session ended without achieving anything on that front.

A bill for the gradual redemption of the national debt was more successful. The President had repeatedly and earnestly recommended to the legislature the adoption of measures which might effect this favourite object; but, although that party which had been reproached with a desire to accumulate debt as a means of subverting the republican system had uniformly manifested a disposition to carry this recommendation into effect, their desire had hitherto been opposed by obstacles they were unable to surmount. Professions of an anxious solicitude to discharge the national engagements, without providing the means of actual payment, might gratify those who consider words as things, but would be justly estimated by men, who, neither condemning indiscriminately, nor approving blindly, all the measures of government, expect that, in point of fact, it shall be rightly and honestly administered. On the friends of the administration, therefore, it was incumbent to provide real, substantial funds, which should attest the sincerity of their professions. This provision could not be made without difficulty. The duty on imported articles, and on tonnage, though rapidly augmenting, could not, immediately, be rendered sufficiently productive to meet, alone, the various exigencies of the treasury, and yield a surplus for the secure establishment of a permanent fund to redeem the principal of the debt. Additional sources of revenue must therefore be explored, or the idea of reducing the debt be abandoned. New taxes are the never failing sources of discontent to those who pay them, and will ever furnish weapons against those who impose them, too operative not to be seized by their antagonists. In a government where popularity is power, it requires no small degree of patriotism to encounter the odium which, however urgently required, they seldom fail to excite. Ready faith is given to the declaration that they are unjust, tyrannical, and unnecessary; and no inconsiderable degree of firmness is requisite to persevere in a course attended with so much political hazard. The opposition made to the internal taxes, which commenced in congress, had extended itself through the community. Although only the act imposing duties on spirits distilled within the United States had been resisted by force, yet such a degree of irritation was manifested against the whole system, as to evince the repugnance with which a large portion of the people saw it go into operation. The duties on refined sugars, and manufactured tobacco, especially, were censured in terms which would authorize an opinion that a defect of power, rather than of will, to resist the execution of the law, confined some of its opponents to remonstrances. Nothing could be more unfriendly than this spirit, to the reduction of the debt.

A bill to gradually pay off the national debt was more successful. The President had repeatedly and sincerely urged the legislature to adopt measures that could achieve this goal; however, while the party often accused of wanting to increase the debt to undermine the republican system had consistently shown a willingness to carry out this recommendation, they had faced obstacles they couldn't overcome. Promises of a strong desire to meet national obligations, without providing the actual means to do so, might satisfy those who view words as actions, but would be rightly assessed by individuals who, not blindly approving or condemning all government measures, expect genuine and honest administration. Therefore, it was essential for the administration's supporters to provide real, substantial funding that would prove the sincerity of their claims. This funding could not be secured easily. The duties on imported goods and tonnage, although growing quickly, could not yet generate enough revenue on their own to meet the various needs of the treasury and create a surplus for a reliable fund to pay off the debt's principal. Additional sources of revenue had to be found, or the idea of reducing the debt would have to be abandoned. New taxes are always a source of discontent for those who pay them and easily become weapons for opponents, who are quick to use them. In a government where popularity equals power, it takes a significant amount of patriotism to face the backlash that, although often necessary, usually arises. There is a strong belief that these taxes are unjust, tyrannical, and unnecessary; and it takes a considerable amount of determination to stick to a path filled with political risk. The opposition to internal taxes, which began in Congress, had spread throughout the community. Although only the law imposing duties on spirits distilled within the United States faced violent resistance, there was significant irritation toward the entire system, showing how much a good portion of the public disliked its implementation. Duties on refined sugar and manufactured tobacco, in particular, were criticized in ways that suggested a lack of power, rather than will, to resist the law's enforcement limited some opponents to only protests. Nothing could be more detrimental to debt reduction than this attitude.

The reports of the secretary of the treasury having suggested the several steps which had been taken by congress in the system of internal taxation, he was justly considered as its author. The perseverance which marked the character of this officer, gave full assurance that no clamour would deter him from continuing to recommend measures which he believed to be essential to the due administration of the finances. That the establishment of public credit on a sound basis was all important to the character and prosperity of the United States, constituted one of those political maxims to which he invariably adhered; and to effect it completely, seems to have been among the first objects of his ambition. He had bestowed upon this favourite subject the most attentive consideration; and while the legislature was engaged in the discussions of a report made by a select committee on a resolution moved by Mr. Smith, of South Carolina, purporting that further provision ought to be made for the reduction of the debt, addressed a letter to the house of representatives, through their speaker, informing them that he had digested and prepared a plan on the basis of the actual revenues, for the further support of public credit, which he was ready to communicate.

The reports from the Secretary of the Treasury had pointed out the various steps Congress took in the internal taxation system, so he was rightly seen as its creator. The determination that characterized this official gave confidence that no outcry would stop him from continuing to suggest measures he considered vital for properly managing the finances. He firmly believed that establishing public credit on a solid foundation was crucial for the reputation and prosperity of the United States, which was one of those political principles he always stuck to; achieving this completely seemed to be one of his primary goals. He had given this favored topic a lot of careful thought, and while Congress was debating a report made by a select committee on a resolution introduced by Mr. Smith of South Carolina, which suggested that more efforts should be made to reduce the debt, he sent a letter to the House of Representatives through their Speaker, letting them know that he had developed a plan based on current revenues to further support public credit, and he was ready to share it.

This comprehensive and valuable report presented the result of his laborious and useful investigations, on a subject equally intricate and interesting.

This detailed and valuable report presented the findings of his extensive and helpful research on a topic that is both complex and fascinating.

This was the last official act of Colonel Hamilton. The penurious provision made for those who filled the high executive departments in the American government, excluded from a long continuance in office all those whose fortunes were moderate, and whose professional talents placed a decent independence within their reach. While slandered as the accumulator of thousands by illicit means, Colonel Hamilton had wasted in the public service great part of the property acquired by his previous labours, and had found himself compelled to decide on retiring from his political station. The accusations brought against him in the last session of the second congress had postponed the execution of this design, until opportunity should be afforded for a more full investigation of his official conduct; but he informed the President that, on the close of the session, to meet in December, 1793, he should resign his situation in the administration. The events which accumulated about that time, and which were, he said in a letter to the President, of a nature to render the continuance of peace in a considerable degree precarious, deferred his meditated retreat. "I do not perceive," he added, "that I could voluntarily quit my post at such a juncture, consistently with considerations either of duty or character; and therefore, I find myself reluctantly obliged to defer the offer of my resignation.

This was Colonel Hamilton's last official act. The meager pay set for those in high executive positions in the American government made it hard for people with moderate wealth and professional skills that could offer a decent living to stay in office for long. While he was accused of amassing wealth through shady means, Colonel Hamilton had spent a large portion of the money he earned from his earlier work on public service and felt he had to decide to step away from his political role. The allegations against him during the last session of the second congress delayed his plan to resign until there was a chance for a more thorough investigation of his actions in office; however, he notified the President that he intended to resign when the session ended in December 1793. The events unfolding around that time, which he mentioned in a letter to the President, made the peace seem quite fragile, causing him to put off his planned resignation. "I do not see," he added, "how I could willingly leave my position at such a critical time, in line with either duty or my character; thus, I find myself reluctantly compelled to postpone my resignation."

"But if any circumstances should have taken place in consequence of the intimation of an intention to resign, or should otherwise exist, which serve to render my continuance in office in any degree inconvenient or ineligible, I beg leave to assure you, sir, that I should yield to them with all the readiness naturally inspired by an impatient desire to relinquish a situation, in which, even a momentary stay is opposed by the strongest personal and family reasons, and could only be produced by a sense of duty or reputation."

"But if any situations arise because of the notice of my intention to resign, or if there are any factors that make it inconvenient or undesirable for me to continue in this role, I want to assure you, sir, that I would step down as quickly as possible due to a strong desire to leave a position where even a brief stay is strongly opposed by personal and family reasons. The only reason I would stay is out of a sense of duty or reputation."

Resignation of Colonel Hamilton.
1795

Assurances being given by the President, of the pleasure with which the intelligence, that he would continue at his post through the crisis, was received, he remained in office until the commencement of the ensuing year. On the 1st of December, immediately on his return from the western country, the dangers of domestic insurrection or foreign war having subsided, he gave notice that he should on the last day of January give in his resignation.

Assurances were provided by the President about how pleased he was to receive the news that he would stay in his position during the crisis. He stayed in office until the beginning of the following year. On December 1st, right after his return from the western states, with the threats of domestic rebellion or foreign conflict having eased, he announced that he would resign on the last day of January.

Seldom has any minister excited the opposite passions of love and hate in a higher degree than Colonel Hamilton. His talents were too pre-eminent not to receive from all the tribute of profound respect; and his integrity and honour as a man, not less than his official rectitude, though slandered at a distance, were admitted to be superior to reproach, by those enemies who knew him.

Seldom has any minister stirred up such strong feelings of love and hate as Colonel Hamilton. His remarkable talents earned him deep respect from everyone, and both his integrity and honor as a person, as well as his fairness in office, were acknowledged to be beyond reproach by those enemies who truly knew him, even if they slandered him from afar.

But with respect to his political principles and designs, the most contradictory opinions were entertained. While one party sincerely believed his object to be the preservation of the constitution of the United States in its original purity; the other, with perhaps equal sincerity, imputed to him the insidious intention of subverting it. While his friends were persuaded, that as a statesman, he viewed all foreign nations with an equal eye; his enemies could perceive in his conduct, only hostility to France and attachment to her rival.

But regarding his political beliefs and plans, people had very different opinions. One group genuinely thought his goal was to protect the U.S. Constitution in its original form; the other, with maybe the same level of sincerity, accused him of secretly trying to undermine it. While his supporters were convinced that as a statesman, he viewed all foreign nations equally, his critics only saw animosity toward France and loyalty to her competitor.

It was his fortune to hold a conspicuous station in times which were peculiarly tempestuous, and under circumstances peculiarly unfavourable to the fair action of the judgment. In the midst of prejudices against the national debt, which had taken deep root, and had long been nourished, he was called to the head of a department, whose duty it was to contend with those prejudices, and to offer a system which, in doing justice to the creditor of the public, might retrieve the reputation of his country. While the passions were inflamed by a stern contest between the advocates of a national, and of state governments, duties were assigned to him, in the execution of which there were frequent occasions to manifest his devotion to the former. When a raging fever, caught from that which was desolating France, and exhibiting some of its symptoms, had seized the public mind, and reached its understanding, it was unfavourable to his quiet, and perhaps to his fame, that he remain uninfected by the disease. He judged the French revolution without prejudice; and had the courage to predict that it could not terminate in a free and popular government.

It was his luck to hold a prominent position during particularly turbulent times, and under circumstances that were especially unfavorable to fair judgment. In the midst of deep-rooted prejudices against the national debt, which had long been cultivated, he was appointed to lead a department responsible for addressing those prejudices and proposing a system that, while honoring the public creditors, could restore his country's reputation. While passions were heightened by a fierce battle between supporters of national and state governments, he was tasked with duties that often required him to show his commitment to the former. When a raging fever, similar to the one devastating France, seized the public mindset and affected its understanding, it was detrimental to his peace and possibly to his reputation that he remained unaffected by the turmoil. He assessed the French Revolution without bias and had the courage to predict that it would not lead to a free and popular government.

Such opinions, at such a time, could not fail to draw a load of obloquy upon a man whose frankness gave them publicity, and whose boldness and decision of character insured them an able and steady support. The suspicions they were calculated to generate, derived great additional force from the political theories he was understood to hold. It was known that, in his judgment, the constitution of the United States was rather chargeable with imbecility, than censurable for its too great strength; and that the real sources of danger to American happiness and liberty, were to be found in its want of the means to effect the objects of its institution;—in its being exposed to the encroachments of the states,—not in the magnitude of its powers. Without attempting to conceal these opinions, he declared his perfect acquiescence in the decision of his country; his hope that the issue would be fortunate; and his firm determination, in whatever might depend upon his exertions, to give the experiment the fairest chance for success. No part of his political conduct has been perceived, which would inspire doubts of the sincerity of these declarations. His friends may appeal with confidence to his official acts, to all his public conduct, for the refutation of those charges which were made against him while at the head of the treasury department, and were continued, without interruption, till he ceased to be the object of jealousy.

Such opinions at that time couldn’t help but bring a lot of criticism on a man whose honesty made them public, and whose courage and strong character ensured they had solid and reliable backing. The doubts they were likely to raise gained even more strength from the political beliefs he was known to hold. It was understood that he believed the U.S. Constitution was more about weakness than overreach; that the real threats to American happiness and freedom stemmed from its inability to achieve its intended goals;—from its vulnerability to state encroachments,—not from the size of its powers. Without trying to hide these beliefs, he expressed complete acceptance of his country’s decision, his hope for a positive outcome, and his strong commitment, in anything that depended on his efforts, to give the experiment the best possible chance to succeed. No part of his political actions has shown a reason to doubt the sincerity of these statements. His friends can confidently reference his official actions and all his public conduct as evidence against the accusations made against him while he led the treasury department, which continued without pause until he was no longer the target of suspicion.

In the esteem and good opinion of the President, to whom he was best known, Colonel Hamilton at all times maintained a high place. While balancing on the mission to England, and searching for a person to whom the interesting negotiation with that government should be confided, the mind of the chief magistrate was directed, among others, to this gentleman.[30] He carried with him out of office,[31] the same cordial esteem for his character, and respect for his talents, which had induced his appointment.

In the eyes and good opinion of the President, who knew him best, Colonel Hamilton consistently held a prominent position. While contemplating a mission to England and looking for someone to handle the important negotiations with that government, the President considered this gentleman among others.[30] He left office with the same warm regard for his character and respect for his abilities that had led to his appointment.[31]

Is succeeded by Mr. Wolcott.

The vacant office of secretary of the treasury was filled by Mr. Wolcott, of Connecticut, a gentleman of sound judgment, who was well versed in its duties. He had served as comptroller for a considerable time, and in that situation, had been eminently useful to the head of the department.

The empty position of secretary of the treasury was filled by Mr. Wolcott from Connecticut, a man with good judgment who was knowledgeable about the responsibilities of the role. He had worked as comptroller for a significant period and had been extremely helpful to the head of the department in that role.

The report of the select committee recommended additional objects for internal taxation, and that the temporary duties already imposed should be rendered permanent. The opposition made to this important part of the system was so ardent, and so persevering, that, though the measure was taken up early in the session, the bill did not pass the house of representatives until late in February. Not only were the taxes proposed by the friends of the administration encountered successively by popular objections, urged with all the vehemence of passion, and zeal of conviction, but it was with extreme difficulty that the duties on sugar refined, and tobacco manufactured, within the United States, could be rendered permanent. When gentlemen were urged to produce a substitute for the system they opposed, a direct tax was mentioned with approbation; but no disposition was shown to incur the responsibility of becoming the patrons of such a measure. At length, by the most persevering exertions of the federal party, the bill was carried through the house; and thus was that system adopted, which, if its operations shall not be disturbed, and if no great accumulations of debt be made, will, in a few years, discharge all the engagements of the United States.

The select committee's report suggested new targets for internal taxation and proposed that the temporary duties already in place become permanent. The pushback against this significant part of the system was so intense and persistent that, despite being introduced early in the session, the bill didn’t get through the House of Representatives until late February. The proposed taxes from the administration's supporters faced numerous public objections, presented with all the passion and conviction possible, and it was extremely challenging to make the duties on refined sugar and manufactured tobacco within the United States permanent. When people were encouraged to offer an alternative to the system they opposed, a direct tax was positively regarded; however, no one wanted to take on the responsibility of backing such a measure. Ultimately, through the relentless efforts of the federal party, the bill passed in the House; and thus, that system was implemented, which, if its operations are not disrupted and no major debts accumulate, will in a few years fulfill all of the United States' obligations.

On the third of March, this important session was ended. Although the party hostile to the administration had obtained a small majority in one branch of the legislature, several circumstances had occurred to give great weight to the recommendations of the President. Among these may be reckoned the victory obtained by General Wayne, and the suppression of the western insurrection. In some points, however, which he had pressed with earnestness, his sentiments did not prevail. One of these was a bill introduced into the senate for preserving peace with the Indians, by protecting them from the intrusions and incursions of the whites.

On March 3rd, this important session concluded. Even though the opposition party gained a slight majority in one part of the legislature, several factors added significant support to the President's recommendations. Among these were General Wayne’s victory and the quelling of the western uprising. However, in some areas where he had strongly advocated, his views did not win out. One of these was a bill introduced in the Senate aimed at maintaining peace with the Native Americans by shielding them from the encroachments and intrusions of white settlers.

From the commencement of his administration, the President had reviewed this subject with great interest, and had permitted scarcely a session of congress to pass away, without pressing it on the attention of the legislature. It had been mentioned in his speech at the commencement of the present session, and had been further enforced by a message accompanying a report made upon it by the secretary of war. The following humane sentiments, extracted from that report, are characteristic of the general views of the administration.

From the start of his presidency, the President had paid close attention to this issue and rarely let a session of Congress go by without bringing it up. He mentioned it in his speech at the beginning of the current session and reinforced it with a message that came with a report from the Secretary of War. The following compassionate thoughts, taken from that report, reflect the overall views of the administration.

"It seems that our own experience would demonstrate the propriety of endeavouring to preserve a pacific conduct in preference to a hostile one with the Indian tribes. The United States can get nothing by an Indian war; but they risk men, money, and reputation. As we are more powerful and more enlightened than they are, there is a responsibility of national character that we should treat them with kindness, and even with liberality."

"It seems that our own experience shows the importance of trying to maintain a peaceful approach rather than a hostile one with the Native American tribes. The United States gains nothing from a war with them; instead, we put our people, resources, and reputation on the line. Since we are stronger and more knowledgeable than they are, we have a responsibility to treat them with kindness and generosity."

The plan suggested in this report was, to add to those arrangements respecting trade, which were indispensable to the preservation of peace, a chain of garrisoned posts within the territory of the Indians, provided their assent to the measure should be obtained; and to subject all those who should trespass on their lands to martial law. A bill founded on this report passed the senate, but was lost, in the house of representatives, by a small majority.

The plan proposed in this report was to add to the necessary trade arrangements to keep the peace by establishing a series of military outposts within Indian territory, provided they agreed to it; and to put anyone who trespassed on their land under martial law. A bill based on this report passed the Senate but was narrowly defeated in the House of Representatives.

Resignation of General Knox.

This report preceded the resignation of the secretary of war but a few days. This valuable officer, too, was driven from the service of the public, by the scantiness of the compensation allowed him.

This report came just a few days before the secretary of war resigned. This valuable officer was also forced out of public service due to the low compensation he received.

On the 28th of December, 1794, he addressed a letter to the President giving him official notice that, with the year, his services as secretary for the department of war would cease. This resolution had long before been verbally communicated.

On December 28, 1794, he wrote a letter to the President officially notifying him that, with the new year, his role as secretary for the department of war would come to an end. This decision had been discussed verbally long before.

"After having served my country," concluded the letter, "near twenty years, the greater portion of the time under your immediate auspices, it is with extreme reluctance I find myself constrained to withdraw from so honourable a situation. But the natural and powerful claims of a numerous family will no longer permit me to neglect their essential interests.

"After serving my country for almost twenty years," the letter concluded, "most of that time under your direct supervision, it is with great reluctance that I feel I must step away from such an honorable position. However, the significant responsibilities I have toward my large family can no longer allow me to ignore their essential needs."

"In whatever situation I shall be, I shall recollect your confidence and kindness with all the fervour and purity of affection, of which a grateful heart is susceptible."

"In whatever situation I find myself, I will remember your trust and kindness with all the warmth and sincerity of feelings that a grateful heart can hold."

In the letter accepting his resignation, the President expressed the regret it occasioned, and added:

In the letter accepting his resignation, the President expressed his regret about it and added:

"I can not suffer you, however, to close your public service, without uniting to the satisfaction which must arise in your own mind from conscious rectitude, assurances of my most perfect persuasion that you have deserved well of your country.

"I cannot let you end your public service without expressing my belief that you have truly served your country well, alongside the satisfaction that surely comes from your own sense of integrity."

"My personal knowledge of your exertions, while it authorizes me to hold this language, justifies the sincere friendship which I have borne you, and which will accompany you in every situation of life."

"My own understanding of your efforts allows me to speak like this and justifies the genuine friendship I have for you, which will be with you in every situation in life."

Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.

Colonel Pickering, a gentleman who had filled many important offices through the war of the revolution; who had discharged several trusts of considerable confidence under the present government; and who at the time was postmaster general, was appointed to succeed him.

Colonel Pickering, a man who had held many important positions during the Revolutionary War; who had fulfilled several significant responsibilities under the current government; and who was the postmaster general at the time, was chosen to take his place.

On the seventh of March, the treaty of amity, commerce, and navigation, between the United States and Great Britain, which had been signed by the ministers of the two nations, on the 19th of the preceding November, was received at the office of state.

On March 7th, the treaty of friendship, trade, and navigation between the United States and Great Britain, which was signed by the ministers of both nations on November 19th of the previous year, was received at the State Department.

Treaty between the United States and Great Britain.

From his arrival in London on the 15th of June, Mr. Jay had been assiduously and unremittingly employed on the arduous duties of his mission. By a deportment respectful, yet firm, mingling a decent deference for the government to which he was deputed, with a proper regard for the dignity of his own, this minister avoided those little asperities which frequently embarrass measures of great concern, and smoothed the way to the adoption of those which were suggested by the real interests of both nations. Many and intricate were the points to be discussed. On some of them an agreement was found to be impracticable; but, at length, a treaty was concluded, which Mr. Jay declared to be the best that was attainable, and which he believed it for the interests of the United States to accept.[32] Indeed it was scarcely possible to contemplate the evidences of extreme exasperation which were given in America, and the nature of the differences which subsisted between the two countries, without feeling a conviction that war was inevitable, should this attempt to adjust those differences prove unsuccessful.

From the moment Mr. Jay arrived in London on June 15th, he was diligently and tirelessly engaged in the challenging tasks of his mission. With a respectful yet assertive demeanor, balancing a proper respect for the government he represented with a solid acknowledgment of his own country's dignity, this minister sidestepped the minor tensions that often complicate major negotiations. He facilitated the process of implementing policies that truly benefited both nations. There were many complex issues to discuss. While some ended up being impossible to agree on, ultimately, a treaty was reached that Mr. Jay believed was the best possible outcome and in the best interest of the United States to accept. Indeed, it was hard to ignore the intense frustration evident in America and the nature of the disagreements between the two countries, without realizing that war would be inevitable if this attempt to resolve those issues failed.

On Monday, the 8th of June, the senate, in conformity with the summons of the President, convened in the senate chamber, and the treaty, with the documents connected with it, were submitted to their consideration.

On Monday, June 8th, the Senate, following the President's call, met in the Senate chamber, and the treaty along with its related documents were presented for their review.

On the 24th of June, after a minute and laborious investigation, the senate, by precisely a constitutional majority, advised and consented to its conditional ratification.

On June 24th, after a thorough and painstaking investigation, the senate, with exactly the required constitutional majority, agreed to its conditional ratification.

An insuperable objection existed to an article regulating the intercourse with the British West Indies, founded on a fact which is understood to have been unknown to Mr. Jay. The intention of the contracting parties was to admit the direct intercourse between the United States and those islands, but not to permit the productions of the latter to be carried to Europe in the vessels of the former. To give effect to this intention, the exportation from the United States of those articles which were the principal productions of the islands was to be relinquished. Among these was cotton. This article, which a few years before was scarcely raised in sufficient quantity for domestic consumption, was becoming one of the richest staples of the southern states. The senate being informed of this fact, advised and consented that the treaty should be ratified on condition that an article be added thereto, suspending that part of the twelfth article which related to the intercourse with the West Indies.

An insurmountable issue arose with an article regulating trade with the British West Indies, based on a fact that Mr. Jay was reportedly unaware of. The goal of the parties involved was to allow direct trade between the United States and those islands, but not to let the products from the islands be shipped to Europe on American vessels. To make this happen, the export of key products from the United States, including cotton, was to be given up. Just a few years earlier, cotton was hardly produced enough for domestic use, but it was becoming one of the most valuable goods in the southern states. Once the senate learned of this, they agreed to ratify the treaty on the condition that an article be added to suspend the part of the twelfth article that dealt with trade with the West Indies.

Although, in the mind of the President, several objections to the treaty had occurred, they were overbalanced by its advantages; and before transmitting it to the senate, he had resolved to ratify it, if approved by that body. The resolution of the senate presented difficulties which required consideration. Whether they could advise and consent to an article which had not been laid before them; and whether their resolution was to be considered as the final exercise of their power, were questions not entirely free from difficulty. Nor was it absolutely clear that the executive could ratify the treaty, under the advice of the senate, until the suspending article should be introduced into it. A few days were employed in the removal of these doubts, at the expiration of which, intelligence was received from Europe which suspended the resolution which the President had formed.

Even though the President had several concerns about the treaty, he believed its benefits outweighed the objections. He decided to ratify it, pending approval from the Senate. However, the Senate's resolution brought up challenges that needed to be addressed. They had to consider whether they could give advice and consent to an article that hadn’t been presented to them, and whether their resolution would be seen as the final use of their authority were complex questions. It wasn't entirely clear that the executive could ratify the treaty with the Senate's advice until the suspending article was added to it. A few days were spent resolving these questions, but soon after, information from Europe came in that put the President's decision on hold.

The English papers contained an account, which, though not official, was deemed worthy of credit, that the order of the 8th of June, 1793, for the seizure of provisions going to French ports, was renewed. In the apprehension that this order might be construed and intended as a practical construction of that article in the treaty which seemed to favour the idea that provisions, though not generally contraband, might occasionally become so, a construction in which he had determined not to acquiesce, the President thought it wise to reconsider his decision. Of the result of this reconsideration, there is no conclusive testimony. A strong memorial against this objectionable order was directed; and the propositions to withhold the ratifications of the treaty until the order should be repealed; to make the exchange of ratifications dependent upon that event; and to adhere to his original purpose of pursuing the advice of the senate, connecting with that measure the memorial which had been mentioned, as an act explanatory of the sense in which his ratification was made, were severally reviewed by him. In conformity with his practice of withholding his opinion on controverted points until it should become necessary to decide them, he suspended his determination on these propositions until the memorial should be prepared and laid before him. In the meantime, his private affairs required that he should visit Mount Vernon.

The English papers included a report, which, while not official, was considered credible, stating that the order from June 8, 1793, to seize supplies heading to French ports was renewed. Concerned that this order could be interpreted as a practical interpretation of a treaty article suggesting that supplies, though generally not considered contraband, could sometimes be viewed as such—a view he was determined not to accept—the President thought it wise to reassess his earlier decision. There’s no definitive evidence of the outcome of this reassessment. A strong petition against this problematic order was sent; there were proposals to withhold ratification of the treaty until the order was repealed, to make the exchange of ratifications dependent on this event, and to stick to his initial plan of seeking the Senate's advice, connecting this measure with the mentioned petition as a way to clarify his intent regarding the ratification. True to his approach of holding back his opinion on disputed issues until it was necessary to make a decision, he postponed his determination on these proposals until the petition was prepared and presented to him. In the meantime, he needed to attend to personal matters at Mount Vernon.

So restless and uneasy was the temper respecting foreign nations, that no surprise ought to be excited at the anxiety which was felt on the negotiation of a treaty with Great Britain, nor at the means which were used, before its contents were known, to extend the prejudices against it.

So restless and uneasy was the mood about foreign countries that there should be no surprise at the anxiety felt over the negotiation of a treaty with Great Britain, nor at the efforts used, before its details were known, to amplify the negative feelings towards it.

Great umbrage was taken at the mysterious secrecy in which the negotiation had been involved. That the instrument itself was not immediately communicated to the public, and that the senate deliberated upon it with closed doors, were considered as additional evidences of the contempt in which their rulers held the feelings and understandings of the people, and of the monarchical tendencies of the government. Crowned heads, it was loudly repeated, who were machinating designs subversive of the rights of man, and the happiness of nations, might well cover with an impenetrable veil, their dark transactions; but republics ought to have no secrets. In republics, those to whom power was delegated, being the servants of the people, acting solely for their benefit, ought to transact all national affairs in open day. This doctrine was not too absurd for the extravagance of the moment.

Great offense was taken at the mysterious secrecy surrounding the negotiations. The fact that the actual document wasn't shared with the public right away, and that the senate discussed it behind closed doors, were seen as further proof of the contempt their leaders had for the feelings and understanding of the people, as well as the government’s monarchical tendencies. It was loudly repeated that crowned heads, who were plotting against the rights of man and the happiness of nations, could justify hiding their shady dealings behind a thick veil, but republics should have no secrets. In republics, those given power, as the servants of the people acting solely for their benefit, should handle all national matters openly. This idea wasn't too ridiculous for the craziness of the time.

The predetermined hostility to the treaty increased in activity, as the period for deciding its fate approached. On its particular merits, no opinion could be formed, because they were unknown; but on the general question of reconciliation between the two countries, a decisive judgment was extensively made up. The sentiments called forth by the occasion demonstrated, that no possible adjustment of differences with Great Britain, no possible arrangement which might promise a future friendly intercourse with that nation, could be satisfactory. The President was openly attacked; his whole system strongly condemned; and the mission of Mr. Jay, particularly, was reprobated in terms of peculiar harshness. That a treaty of amity and commerce should have been formed, whatever might be its principles, was a degrading insult to the American people; a pusillanimous surrender of their honour; and an insidious injury to France. Between such a compact, and an alliance, no distinction was taken. It was an abandonment of the ancient ally of the United States, whose friendship had given them independence, and whose splendid victories still protected them, for a close connexion with her natural enemy, and with the enemy of human liberty.

The hostility toward the treaty ramped up as the deadline for deciding its fate got closer. No one could form an opinion on its specific terms because they were unknown, but a clear judgment was widely formed on the general issue of reconciliation between the two countries. The feelings expressed at the time showed that no possible resolution of differences with Great Britain, and no arrangement that might offer a future friendly relationship with them, could be considered acceptable. The President faced public criticism; his entire approach was condemned; and Mr. Jay's mission, in particular, was harshly criticized. The fact that a treaty of friendship and trade was being established, regardless of its principles, was seen as a humiliating insult to the American people, a cowardly sacrifice of their honor, and a deceptive harm to France. There was no distinction made between such a pact and an alliance. It was seen as a betrayal of the United States' longstanding ally, whose support had helped them gain independence and whose remarkable victories still safeguarded them, in favor of a close relationship with their natural enemy and the enemy of human liberty.

The pretended object of the mission, it was said, was a reparation for wrongs, not a contaminating connexion with the most faithless and corrupt court in the world. The return of the envoy without that reparation, was a virtual surrender of the claim. The honour of the United States required a peremptory demand of the immediate surrender of the western posts, and of compensation for the piratical depredations committed on their commerce; not a disgraceful and humiliating negotiation. The surrender, and the compensation, ought to have been made instantly; for no reliance could be placed in promises to be performed in future.

The supposed goal of the mission was said to be making up for past wrongs, not forming a dirty connection with the most untrustworthy and corrupt government in the world. If the envoy returned without that reparation, it would be seen as giving up on the claim. The honor of the United States demanded a firm demand for the immediate return of the western posts and compensation for the pirate attacks on their trade; not a shameful and humiliating negotiation. The return and the compensation should have happened immediately, as no trust could be placed in promises to be fulfilled later.

That the disinclination formerly manifested by Great Britain, to give the stability and certainty of compact to the principles regulating the commercial intercourse between the two countries, had constituted an important item in the catalogue of complaints against that power: that the existence, or non-existence of commercial treaties had been selected as the criterion by which to regulate the discriminations proposed to be made in the trade of foreign nations; that, in the discussion on this subject, the favourers of commercial hostility had uniformly supported the policy of giving value to treaties with the United States; these opinions were instantly relinquished by the party which had strenuously asserted them while urged by their leaders in congress; and it was imputed as a crime to the government, and to its negotiator, that he had proceeded further than to demand immediate and unconditional reparation of the wrongs sustained by the United States.

That the reluctance previously shown by Great Britain to establish a stable and clear agreement on the principles governing trade between the two countries had become a significant part of the complaints against that nation: that the existence, or lack thereof, of trade treaties was used as the standard to decide the distinctions to be made in the trade with foreign countries; that during the discussions on this issue, supporters of trade hostility consistently backed the approach of valuing treaties with the United States; these views were quickly abandoned by the group that had strongly upheld them while pressured by their leaders in Congress; and it was blamed on the government and its negotiator that he had gone beyond merely demanding immediate and unconditional compensation for the wrongs faced by the United States.

The most strenuous and unremitting exertions to give increased energy to the love which was openly avowed for France, and to the detestation which was not less openly avowed for England,[33] were connected with this course of passionate declamation.

The most intense and constant efforts to amplify the love openly expressed for France, and the hatred that was equally openly expressed for England,[33] were tied to this pattern of passionate speech.

Such was the state of parties when the senate advised the ratification of the treaty. Although common usage, and a decent respect for the executive, and for a foreign nation, not less than a positive resolution, required that the seal of secrecy should not be broken by the senate, an abstract of this instrument, not very faithfully taken, was given to the public; and on the 29th of June, a senator of the United States transmitted a copy of it to the most distinguished editor of the opposition party in Philadelphia, to be communicated to the public through the medium of the press.

Such was the state of affairs when the Senate recommended ratifying the treaty. While common practice and a proper respect for the executive branch and a foreign nation, along with a firm decision, meant that the Senate shouldn't reveal any secrets, a summary of this document—although not very accurately represented—was made public. On June 29th, a U.S. senator sent a copy of it to the leading editor of the opposition party in Philadelphia, so it could be shared with the public through the press.

If the negotiation itself had been acrimoniously censured; if amicable arrangements, whatever might be their character, had been passionately condemned; it was not to be expected that the treaty would assuage these pre-existing irritations.

If the negotiation itself had been harshly criticized; if friendly agreements, no matter what their nature, had been passionately denounced; it wasn’t reasonable to expect that the treaty would ease these existing tensions.

In fact, public opinion did receive a considerable shock, and men uninfested by the spirit of faction felt some disappointment on its first appearance. In national contests, unless there be an undue attachment to the adversary country, few men, even among the intelligent, are sensible of the weakness which may exist in their own pretensions, or can allow their full force to the claims of the other party. If the people at large enter keenly into the points of controversy with a foreign power, they can never be satisfied with any equal adjustment of those points, unless other considerations, stronger than abstract reason, afford that satisfaction; nor will it ever be difficult to prove to them, in a case unassisted by the passions, that in any practicable commercial contract, they give too much, and receive too little.

In fact, public opinion did get a significant shock, and people unaffected by factionalism felt some disappointment at its initial appearance. In national competitions, unless there's an excessive loyalty to the opposing country, few people, even among the educated, realize the weaknesses in their own positions or can truly appreciate the claims of the other side. If the general public engages deeply in the issues of debate with a foreign power, they will never be satisfied with any fair resolution of those issues unless other, stronger factors than pure reason provide that satisfaction; it will always be easy to show them, in a case free from emotions, that in any reasonable commercial agreement, they give away too much and receive too little.

On no subject whatever have considerations, such as these, possessed more influence than in that which was now brought before the American people. Their operation was not confined to those whose passions urged them to take part in the war, nor to the open enemies of the executive. The friends of peace, and of the administration, had generally received impressions unfavourable to the fair exercise of judgment in the case, which it required time and reflection to efface. Even among them, strong prejudices had been imbibed in favour of France, which the open attempts on the sovereignty of the United States had only weakened; and the matters of controversy with Great Britain had been contemplated with all that partiality which men generally feel for their own interests. With respect to commerce also, strong opinions had been preconceived. The desire to gain admission into the British West India islands, especially, had excited great hostility to that colonial system which had been adopted by every country in Europe; and sufficient allowances were not made for the prejudices by which that system was supported.

On no topic have considerations like these had more impact than on the one currently facing the American people. Their effects weren't limited to those whose emotions pushed them to join the war or to the outright opponents of the administration. Even supporters of peace and the government generally held negative impressions that made it hard for them to judge the situation fairly, and it took time and thought to change that. Among them, strong biases in favor of France had developed, which were only slightly diminished by France's blatant challenges to the sovereignty of the United States; the issues with Great Britain were viewed with the usual bias that people tend to have towards their own interests. Regarding trade, there were also strong preconceived notions. The desire to access the British West Indies, in particular, sparked significant resentment towards the colonial system upheld by every European country, and not enough consideration was given to the biases supporting that system.

The treaty, therefore, when exposed to the public view, found one party prepared for a bold and intrepid attack, but the other, not ready in its defence. An appeal to the passions, the prejudices, and the feelings of the nation, might confidently be made by those whose only object was its condemnation; which reflection, information, and consequently time, were required by men whose first impressions were not in its favour, but who were not inclined to yield absolutely to those impressions.

The treaty, when presented to the public, saw one side ready for a bold and fearless attack, while the other was not prepared to defend itself. Those whose only goal was to denounce it could easily appeal to the emotions, biases, and feelings of the nation. In contrast, those who needed reflection, information, and time were more cautious; their initial reactions weren't in favor of the treaty, but they weren't fully willing to give in to those reactions either.

That a treaty involving a great variety of complicated national interests, and adjusting differences of long standing, which had excited strong reciprocal prejudices, would require a patient and laborious investigation, both of the instrument itself, and of the circumstances under which it was negotiated, before even those who are most conversant in diplomatic transactions could form a just estimate of its merits, would be conceded by all reflecting men. But an immense party in America, not in the habit of considering national compacts, without examining the circumstances under which that with Great Britain had been formed, or weighing the reasons which induced it; without understanding the instrument, and in many instances without reading it, rushed impetuously to its condemnation; and, confident that public opinion would be surprised by the suddenness, or stormed by the fury of the assault, expected that the President would be compelled to yield to its violence.

That a treaty involving a wide range of complex national interests and addressing long-standing differences, which had sparked strong mutual biases, would require careful and thorough examination—both of the agreement itself and the circumstances surrounding its negotiation—before even the most experienced diplomats could accurately assess its value, would be agreed upon by all thoughtful people. However, a large faction in America, not used to considering national agreements without looking into the context in which the one with Great Britain was established or weighing the reasons behind it; without understanding the document, and in many cases without even reading it, rushed headlong to condemn it; and, believing that public opinion would be shocked by the suddenness or overwhelmed by the intensity of the attack, expected that the President would have to give in to its force.

In the populous cities, meetings of the people were immediately summoned, in order to take into their consideration, and to express their opinions respecting an instrument, to comprehend the full extent of which, a statesman would need deep reflection in the quiet of his closet, aided by considerable inquiry. It may well be supposed that persons feeling some distrust of their capacity to form, intuitively, a correct judgment on a subject so complex, and disposed only to act knowingly, would be unwilling to make so hasty a decision, and consequently be disinclined to attend such meetings. Many intelligent men, therefore, stood aloof, while the most intemperate assumed, as usual, the name of the people; pronounced a definitive and unqualified condemnation of every article in the treaty; and, with the utmost confidence, assigned reasons for their opinions, which, in many instances, had only an imaginary existence; and in some, were obviously founded on the strong prejudices which were entertained with respect to foreign powers. It is difficult to review the various resolutions and addresses to which the occasion gave birth, without feeling some degree of astonishment, mingled with humiliation, at perceiving such proofs of the deplorable fallibility of human reason.

In the busy cities, gatherings of people were quickly organized to discuss and share their opinions about a document that, for someone experienced in politics, would require deep thought in the solitude of their office, along with significant research. It's easy to assume that people, feeling uncertain about their ability to form an accurate judgment on such a complicated issue and preferring to make informed decisions, would hesitate to rush into a choice, making them less likely to attend these meetings. Many smart individuals therefore kept their distance, while the most extreme voices, as usual, claimed to represent the people; they issued a clear and absolute condemnation of every part of the treaty and confidently provided justifications for their views, which often existed only in their imagination, and in some cases, were clearly based on strong biases against foreign powers. It’s hard to look back at the various resolutions and statements that emerged from this situation without feeling a mix of disbelief and embarrassment at the evident flaws in human reasoning.

The first meeting was held in Boston. The example of that city was soon followed by New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Charleston; and, as if their addresses were designed at least as much for their fellow citizens as for their President, while one copy was transmitted to him, another was committed to the press. The precedent set by these large cities was followed, with wonderful rapidity, throughout the union; and the spirit in which this system of opposition originated sustained no diminution of violence in its progress.

The first meeting took place in Boston. Soon, other cities like New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Charleston followed suit. It seemed that the addresses were meant as much for their fellow citizens as for their President; while one copy was sent to him, another was given to the press. The example set by these major cities was quickly picked up all over the country, and the intensity of the opposition only grew stronger as it developed.

On the 18th of July, at Baltimore, on his way to Mount Vernon, the President received the resolutions passed by the meeting at Boston, which were enclosed to him in a letter from the select men of that town. The answer to this letter and to these resolutions evinced the firmness with which he had resolved to meet the effort that was obviously making, to control the exercise of his constitutional functions, by giving a promptness and vigour to the expression of the sentiments of a party, which might impose it upon the world as the deliberate judgment of the public.

On July 18th, in Baltimore, on his way to Mount Vernon, the President received the resolutions passed by the meeting in Boston, which were sent to him in a letter from the town’s selectmen. His response to this letter and these resolutions showed the determination with which he planned to address the obvious attempt to influence how he exercises his constitutional duties, by promptly and vigorously expressing the views of a party that could present them to the world as the considered opinion of the public.

Addresses to the chief magistrate, and resolutions of town and country meetings, were not the only means which were employed to enlist the American people against the measure which had been advised by the senate. In an immense number of essays, the treaty was critically examined, and every argument which might operate on the judgment or prejudice of the public, was urged in the warm and glowing language of passion. To meet these efforts by counter efforts, was deemed indispensably necessary by the friends of that instrument; and the gazettes of the day are replete with appeals to the passions, and to the reason, of those who are the ultimate arbiters of every political question. That the treaty affected the interests of France not less than those of the United States, was, in this memorable controversy, asserted by the one party, with as much zeal as it was denied by the other. These agitations furnished matter to the President for deep reflection, and for serious regret; but they appear not to have shaken the decision he had formed, or to have affected his conduct otherwise than to induce a still greater degree of circumspection in the mode of transacting the delicate business before him. On their first appearance, therefore, he resolved to hasten his return to Philadelphia, for the purpose of considering, at that place rather than at Mount Vernon, the memorial against the provision order, and the conditional ratification of the treaty. In a private letter to the secretary of state, of the 29th of July, accompanying the official communication of this determination, he stated more at large the motives which induced it. These were, the violent and extraordinary proceedings which were taking place, and might be expected, throughout the union; and his opinion that the memorial, the ratification, and the instructions which were framing, were of such vast magnitude as not only to require great individual consideration, but a solemn conjunct revision.

Addresses to the chief magistrate and resolutions from town and country meetings weren't the only ways used to rally the American people against the measure recommended by the Senate. A vast number of essays critically analyzed the treaty, passionately presenting every argument that could sway public perception or bias. It was deemed absolutely necessary by the supporters of that instrument to respond with counter-efforts; the newspapers of the time are filled with appeals to both the emotions and the reason of those who ultimately decide every political issue. One side argued that the treaty impacted France as much as it did the United States, asserting their point with as much fervor as the other side denied it. These tensions provided the President much to ponder and regret, but they seemed not to have altered his decision or influenced his actions, except to make him even more cautious in handling the delicate matters at hand. Thus, upon their initial emergence, he decided to expedite his return to Philadelphia, preferring to consider the memorial against the provision order and the conditional ratification of the treaty there rather than at Mount Vernon. In a private letter to the Secretary of State on July 29, accompanying the official notice of his decision, he elaborated on the reasons behind it. These included the intense and unusual actions occurring throughout the union and his belief that the memorial, the ratification, and the instructions being drafted were so significant that they required not only careful individual consideration but also a formal joint review.

He viewed the opposition which the treaty was receiving from the meetings in different parts of the union, in a very serious light;—not because there was more weight in any of the objections than was foreseen at first,—for in some of them there was none, and in others, there were gross misrepresentations; nor as it respected himself personally, for that he declared should have no influence on his conduct. He plainly perceived, and was accordingly preparing his mind for, the obloquy which disappointment and malice were collecting to heap upon him. But he was alarmed on account of the effect it might have on France, and the advantage which the government of that country might be disposed to make of the spirit which was at work, to cherish a belief, that the treaty was calculated to favour Great Britain at her expense. Whether she believed or disbelieved these tales, their effect, he said, would be nearly the same.

He took the opposition to the treaty from meetings around the country very seriously—not because the objections held more weight than he initially expected—because some had none, and others were completely misrepresented; nor did it concern him personally, as he made it clear that it wouldn’t affect his actions. He clearly recognized and was mentally preparing for the criticism that disappointment and malice would throw at him. However, he was worried about the potential impact on France and how the government there might take advantage of the situation to foster a belief that the treaty favored Great Britain at France's expense. Whether or not France believed these stories, he noted, their effect would be almost the same.

"To sum up the whole," he added, "in a few words, I have never, since I have been in the administration of the government, seen a crisis which, in my opinion, has been so pregnant with interesting events, nor one from which more is to be apprehended, whether viewed on one side or the other. From New York there is, and I am told will further be, a counter current;[34] but how formidable it may appear I know not. If the same does not take place at Boston and other towns, it will afford but too strong evidence that the opposition is in a manner universal, and would make the ratification a very serious business indeed. But as it respects the French, even counter resolutions would, for the reasons I have already mentioned, do little more than weaken, in a small degree, the effect the other side would have."

"To sum it all up," he added, "in just a few words, I have never, since I've been involved in the government, seen a crisis that, in my view, is so full of significant events, nor one that has so much to fear, whether looked at from one side or the other. From New York, there is, and I've been told there will continue to be, a counter current;[34] but I don’t know how serious it might be. If the same doesn't happen in Boston and other towns, it will provide strong evidence that the opposition is effectively widespread, and would make the ratification a very serious matter indeed. But as for the French, even counter resolutions would, for the reasons I've already mentioned, do little more than slightly weaken the impact the other side would have."

In a private letter of the 31st of July to the same gentleman, after repeating his determination to return to Philadelphia, and his impression of the wisdom, the temperateness, and the firmness for which the crisis most eminently called; he added, "for there is too much reason to believe, from the pains that have been taken before, at, and since the advice of the senate respecting the treaty, that the prejudices against it are more extensive than is generally imagined. How should it be otherwise? When no stone has been left unturned that could impress on the minds of the people the most arrant misrepresentation of facts: that their rights have not only been neglected, but absolutely sold; that there are no reciprocal advantages in the treaty: that the benefits are all on the side of Great Britain: and, what seems to have had more weight with them than all the rest, and has been most pressed, that the treaty is made with the design to oppress the French republic, in open violation of our treaty with that nation, and contrary too to every principal of gratitude and sound policy. In time, when passion shall have yielded to sober reason, the current may possibly turn; but, in the mean while, this government, in relation to France and England, may be compared to a ship between Scylla and Charybdis. If the treaty is ratified, the partisans of the French (or rather of war and confusion) will excite them to hostile measures, or at least to unfriendly sentiments;—if it is not, there is no foreseeing all the consequences that may follow as it respects Great Britain.

In a private letter dated July 31st to the same individual, after reiterating his commitment to return to Philadelphia and his belief in the wisdom, calmness, and strength needed for the current situation, he added, "because there’s too much reason to believe, from the efforts made before, during, and since the Senate's advice about the treaty, that the prejudices against it are wider spread than most people realize. How could it be any different? When every attempt has been made to convince the public of the most outrageous distortions of the truth: that their rights have not only been ignored but outright sold; that there are no mutual benefits in the treaty; that all the advantages favor Great Britain; and what seems to weigh most heavily with them, which has been emphasized the most, is that the treaty was created to oppress the French Republic, in clear violation of our agreement with that nation, and contrary to every principle of gratitude and good policy. Over time, when passion gives way to reason, opinions may change; but, in the meantime, this government, in relation to France and England, can be compared to a ship caught between Scylla and Charybdis. If the treaty is approved, the supporters of the French (or rather of war and chaos) will push for hostile actions, or at least for unfriendly sentiments; if it isn’t, we can’t predict what the consequences might be regarding Great Britain."

"It is not to be inferred from hence that I am or shall be disposed to quit the ground I have taken, unless circumstances more imperious than have yet come to my knowledge, should compel it; for there is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth, and to pursue it steadily. But these things are mentioned to show that a close investigation of the subject is more than ever necessary; and that there are strong evidences of the necessity of the most circumspect conduct in carrying the determination of government into effect, with prudence as it respects our own people, and with every exertion to produce a change for the better with Great Britain."

"It shouldn't be interpreted from this that I am or will be inclined to abandon my position unless circumstances more urgent than what I currently know force me to; because there’s only one clear path, and that is to seek the truth and pursue it consistently. However, I'm mentioning these things to emphasize that a thorough investigation of the topic is more crucial than ever; and there is strong evidence that we need to be very careful in implementing the government's decisions, being thoughtful about our own people, and making every effort to bring about positive change with Great Britain."

In a letter of the third of August, written to the same gentleman, in which he stated the increasing extent of hostility to the treaty, the President added:

In a letter dated August 3rd, addressed to the same gentleman, in which he mentioned the growing opposition to the treaty, the President added:

"All these things do not shake my determination with respect to the proposed ratification, nor will they, unless something more imperious and unknown to me, should, in the opinion of yourself and the gentlemen with you, make it adviseable for me to pause."

"None of these things weaken my resolve regarding the proposed ratification, nor will they, unless something more pressing and unknown to me suggests, in your opinion and that of the gentlemen with you, that it would be wise for me to hold off."

Conditionally ratified by the president.

In the afternoon of the 11th of August the President arrived in Philadelphia; and on the next day, the question respecting the immediate ratification of the treaty was brought before the cabinet. The secretary of state maintained, singly, the opinion, that, during the existence of the provision order,[35] and during the war between Britain and France, this step ought not to be taken. This opinion did not prevail. The resolution was adopted to ratify the treaty immediately, and to accompany the ratification with a strong memorial against the provision order, which should convey, in explicit terms, the sense of the American government on that subject. By this course, the views of the executive were happily accomplished. The order was revoked, and the ratifications of the treaty were exchanged.

In the afternoon of August 11th, the President arrived in Philadelphia, and the next day, the cabinet addressed the issue of the immediate ratification of the treaty. The Secretary of State was the only one who believed that, given the provision order and the ongoing war between Britain and France, this action should not be taken. This viewpoint did not win out. The decision was made to ratify the treaty right away and to accompany the ratification with a strong statement against the provision order, clearly expressing the American government's position on the matter. This approach successfully achieved the executive's goals. The order was revoked, and the treaty ratifications were exchanged.

The treaty unpopular in the United States.

The President was most probably determined to adopt this course by the extreme intemperance with which the treaty was opposed, and the rapid progress which this violence was apparently making. It was obvious that, unless this temper could be checked, it would soon become so extensive, and would arrive at such a point of fury, as to threaten dangerous consequences. It was obviously necessary either to attempt a diminution of its action by rendering its exertions hopeless, and by giving to the treaty the weight of his character and influence, or to determine ultimately to yield to it. A species of necessity therefore seems to have been created for abandoning the idea, if it was ever taken up, of making the ratification of the treaty dependent on the revocation of the provision order.

The President was likely determined to take this path due to the extreme opposition to the treaty and the rapid progress this hostility was seemingly making. It was clear that unless this anger was contained, it would soon spread widely and escalate to a level that could lead to serious consequences. It was necessary to either try to lessen its impact by making its efforts seem futile and by backing the treaty with his character and influence, or ultimately to give in to it. Thus, a kind of necessity seems to have been created to abandon the idea, if it was ever considered, of making the ratification of the treaty dependent on the cancellation of the provision order.

The soundness of the policy which urged this decisive measure was proved by the event. The confidence which was felt in the judgment and virtue of the chief magistrate, induced many, who, swept away by the popular current, had yielded to the common prejudices, to re-examine, and discard opinions which had been too hastily embraced; and many were called forth by a desire to support the administration in measures actually adopted, to take a more active part in the general contest than they would otherwise have pursued. The consequence was, that more moderate opinions respecting the treaty began to prevail.

The effectiveness of the policy that led to this decisive action was confirmed by the outcome. The trust in the wisdom and integrity of the president encouraged many people, who had previously gone along with popular opinions, to rethink and reject views they had too quickly accepted. Many were motivated by a desire to back the administration's adopted measures, leading them to engage more actively in the overall debate than they might have otherwise. As a result, more moderate views on the treaty started to gain traction.

In a letter from Mount Vernon of the 20th of September, addressed to General Knox, who had communicated to him the change of opinion which was appearing in the eastern states, the President expressed in warm terms the pleasure derived from that circumstance, and added: "Next to a conscientious discharge of my public duties, to carry along with me the approbation of my constituents, would be the highest gratification of which my mind is susceptible. But the latter being secondary, I can not make the former yield to it, unless some criterion more infallible than partial (if they are not party) meetings can be discovered as the touchstone of public sentiment. If any person on earth could, or the great power above would, erect the standard of infallibility in political opinions, no being that inhabits this terrestrial globe would resort to it with more eagerness than myself, so long as I remain a servant of the public. But as I have hitherto found no better guide than upright intentions, and close investigation, I shall adhere to them while I keep the watch, leaving it to those who will come after me, to explore new ways, if they like, or think them better."

In a letter from Mount Vernon dated September 20th, addressed to General Knox, who had informed him about the shift in opinion happening in the eastern states, the President expressed his genuine pleasure at this development and added: "After fulfilling my public duties conscientiously, gaining the approval of my constituents would be the greatest satisfaction I could experience. However, since that is secondary, I cannot allow it to take priority over the former unless some more reliable standard than biased (or party) gatherings can be found as a measure of public sentiment. If anyone on earth could, or if the great power above would, establish an infallible standard for political opinions, no one would pursue it more eagerly than I would, as long as I remain a servant of the public. But since I have found no better guidance than honest intentions and thorough investigation, I will stick to them while I’m in this role, leaving it to those who come after me to explore new paths if they wish or consider them better."

Charge against the president rejected.

If the ratification of the treaty increased the number of its open advocates, it seemed also to give increased acrimony to the opposition. Such hold had the President taken of the affections of the people, that even his enemies had deemed it generally necessary to preserve, with regard to him, external marks of decency and respect. Previous to the mission of Mr. Jay, charges against the chief magistrate, though frequently insinuated, had seldom been directly made; and the cover under which the attacks upon his character were conducted, evidenced the caution with which it was deemed necessary to proceed. That mission visibly affected the decorum which had been usually observed towards him; and the ratification of the treaty brought sensations into open view, which had long been ill concealed. His military and political character was attacked with equal violence, and it was averred that he was totally destitute of merit, either as a soldier, or a statesman. The calumnies with which he was assailed were not confined to his public conduct; even his qualities as a man were the subjects of detraction. That he had violated the constitution in negotiating a treaty without the previous advice of the senate, and in embracing within that treaty subjects belonging exclusively to the legislature, was openly maintained, for which an impeachment was publicly suggested; and that he had drawn from the treasury for his private use, more than the salary annexed to his office, was asserted without a blush.[36] This last allegation was said to be supported by extracts from the treasury accounts which had been laid before the legislature, and was maintained with the most persevering effrontery.

If the ratification of the treaty brought more supporters, it also seemed to increase the bitterness of the opposition. The President had gained such a strong hold on the people's affection that even his enemies felt it was necessary to show him some basic decency and respect. Before Mr. Jay's mission, accusations against the leader were often hinted at but rarely stated outright; the way those attacks were made showed how cautious people needed to be. That mission visibly changed the usual respect shown towards him, and the treaty's ratification revealed feelings that had been hidden for a long time. His military and political reputation was attacked with equal ferocity, and it was claimed that he had no merit as a soldier or a statesman. The slanders targeting him weren't limited to his public actions; even his personal qualities were criticized. It was openly argued that he broke the constitution by negotiating a treaty without first consulting the Senate and by including subjects that strictly belonged to the legislature, and there were public calls for impeachment. It was also claimed, without any shame, that he had taken more money from the treasury for personal use than what his official salary was. [36] This last claim was said to be backed by excerpts from the treasury accounts presented to the legislature, and was pushed with relentless boldness.

Though the secretary of the treasury denied that the appropriations made by the legislature had ever been exceeded, the atrocious charge was still confidently repeated; and the few who could triumph in any spot which might tarnish the lustre of Washington's fame, felicitated themselves on the prospect of obtaining a victory over the reputation of a patriot, to whose single influence, they ascribed the failure of their political plans. With the real public, the confidence felt in the integrity of the chief magistrate remained unshaken; but so imposing was the appearance of the documents adduced, as to excite an apprehension that the transaction might be placed in a light to show that some indiscretion, in which he had not participated, had been inadvertently committed.

Although the Treasury Secretary denied that the appropriations made by the legislature had ever been exceeded, the outrageous accusation continued to be confidently spread; and the few who could take pleasure in any situation that might tarnish Washington's reputation reveled in the chance to undermine a patriot whose influence they blamed for the failure of their political ambitions. Among the general public, confidence in the integrity of the president remained strong; however, the weight of the documents presented was so persuasive that it raised concerns that the situation might be portrayed in a way that suggested an indiscretion, which he had not been involved in, had been made by accident.

This state of anxious suspense was of short duration. The late secretary of the treasury, during whose administration of the finances this peculation was said to have taken place, came forward with a full explanation of the fact. It appeared that the President himself had never touched any part of the compensation annexed to his office, but that the whole was received, and disbursed, by the gentleman who superintended the expenses of his household. That it was the practice of the treasury, when a sum had been appropriated for the current year, to pay it to that gentleman occasionally, as the situation of the family might require. The expenses at some periods of the year exceeded, and at others fell short of the allowance for the quarter; so that at some times money was paid in advance on account of the ensuing quarter, and at others, that which was due at the end of the quarter was not completely drawn out. The secretary entered into an examination of the constitution and laws to show that this practice was justifiable, and illustrated his arguments by many examples in which an advance on account of money appropriated to a particular object, before the service was completed, would be absolutely necessary. However this might be, it was a transaction in which the President personally was unconcerned.[37]

This state of anxious suspense didn't last long. The former treasury secretary, under whose management this financial misconduct supposedly occurred, stepped forward with a complete explanation. It turned out that the President himself never handled any part of his salary; instead, all of it was received and managed by the person in charge of his household expenses. It was standard practice for the treasury to pay a budgeted amount to that individual periodically, based on the family's needs throughout the year. At certain times, the expenses were higher and at others lower than the budgeted amount for the quarter, so sometimes money was paid in advance for the upcoming quarter, while at other times, not all the funds due at the end of the quarter were withdrawn. The secretary examined the constitution and laws to demonstrate that this practice was permissible and supported his points with numerous examples showing that advancing funds for a specific purpose before the job was completed could be absolutely necessary. Regardless, the President was not personally involved in this transaction.[37]

When possessed of the entire fact, the public viewed, with just indignation, this attempt to defame a character which was the nation's pride. Americans felt themselves involved in this atrocious calumny on their most illustrious citizen; and its propagators were frowned into silence.

When the full story came to light, the public reacted with rightful anger at this attempt to tarnish the reputation of someone the nation held in high regard. Americans felt personally affected by this terrible slander against their most esteemed citizen, and those spreading it were quickly silenced.

Mr. Randolph resigns. Is succeeded by Colonel Pickering.
Colonel McHenry appointed secretary of war.

On the 19th of August, the secretary of state had resigned[38] his place in the administration, and some time elapsed before a successor was appointed.[39] At length, Colonel Pickering was removed to the department of state, and Mr. M'Henry, a gentleman who had served in the family of General Washington, and in the congress prior to the establishment of the existing constitution, was appointed to the department of war. By the death of Mr. Bradford, a vacancy was also produced in the office of attorney general, which was filled by Mr. Lee, a gentleman of considerable eminence at the bar, and in the legislature of Virginia.

On August 19th, the Secretary of State resigned[38] his position in the administration, and it took some time before a successor was appointed.[39] Eventually, Colonel Pickering was moved to the Department of State, and Mr. M'Henry, a man who had served in General Washington's administration and in Congress before the current Constitution was established, was appointed to the Department of War. The death of Mr. Bradford also created a vacancy in the office of Attorney General, which was filled by Mr. Lee, a respected figure at the bar and in the Virginia legislature.

Many of those embarrassments in which the government, from its institution, had been involved, were now ended, or approaching their termination.

Many of the embarrassments that the government had faced since its establishment were either over or close to being resolved.

The opposition to the laws, which had so long been made in the western counties of Pennsylvania, existed no longer.

The resistance to the laws that had persisted for so long in the western counties of Pennsylvania was no longer present.

Treaty with the Indians north-west of the Ohio.

On the third of August, a definitive treaty was concluded by General Wayne with the hostile Indians north-west of the Ohio, by which the destructive and expensive war which had long desolated that frontier, was ended in a manner perfectly agreeable to the United States. An accommodation had taken place with the powerful tribes of the south also; and to preserve peace in that quarter, it was only necessary to invest the executive with the means of restraining the incursions which the disorderly inhabitants of the southern frontier frequently made into the Indian territory; incursions, of which murder was often the consequence.

On August 3rd, General Wayne reached a solid agreement with the hostile Native Americans northwest of the Ohio, bringing an end to the destructive and costly war that had long devastated that region, in a way that was completely acceptable to the United States. A settlement had also been achieved with the strong tribes in the south; to maintain peace there, it was only necessary to give the government the tools to prevent the frequent raids by the unruly residents of the southern border into Native American lands, which often resulted in murder.

Few subjects had excited more feeling among the people, or in the government of the United States, than the captivity of their fellow citizens in Algiers. Even this calamity had been seized as a weapon which might be wielded with some effect against the President. Overlooking the exertions he had made for the attainment of peace, and the liberation of the American captives; and regardless of his inability to aid negotiation by the exhibition of force, the discontented ascribed the long and painful imprisonment of their unfortunate brethren to a carelessness in the administration respecting their sufferings, and to that inexhaustible source of accusation,—its policy with regard to France and Britain.

Few issues stirred more emotions among the people and the government of the United States than the capture of their fellow citizens in Algiers. This disaster was even used as a tool against the President. Ignoring the efforts he had made to achieve peace and secure the release of the American captives, and disregarding his inability to support negotiations with military action, the dissatisfied blamed the lengthy and painful imprisonment of their unfortunate compatriots on the administration's neglect of their suffering, as well as on its never-ending source of criticism—its policies toward France and Britain.

Treaty with Algiers.

After the failure of several attempts to obtain a peace with the regency of Algiers, a treaty was, at length, negotiated on terms which, though disadvantageous, were the best that could be obtained.

After several unsuccessful attempts to secure peace with the regency of Algiers, a treaty was finally negotiated on terms that, while unfavorable, were the best that could be achieved.

The exertions of the executive to settle the controversy with Spain respecting boundary, and to obtain the free use of the Mississippi, had been unavailing. A negotiation in which Mr. Short and Mr. Carmichael were employed at Madrid, had been protracted by artificial delays on the part of the Spanish cabinet, until those ministers had themselves requested that the commission should be terminated.

The efforts of the executive to resolve the dispute with Spain over the borders and to secure free access to the Mississippi had been unsuccessful. A negotiation involving Mr. Short and Mr. Carmichael in Madrid was dragged out by unnecessary delays from the Spanish government, until those officials themselves asked for the commission to be ended.

Treaty with Spain.

At length, Spain, embarrassed by the war in which she was engaged, discovered symptoms of a temper more inclined to conciliation, and intimated to the secretary of state, through her commissioners at Philadelphia, that a minister, deputed on the special occasion, of higher rank than Mr. Short, who was a resident, would be able to expedite the negotiation. On receiving this intimation, the President, though retaining a high and just confidence in Mr. Short, nominated Mr. Pinckney, in November, 1794, as envoy extraordinary to his Catholic Majesty. Mr. Pinckney repaired in the following summer to Madrid, and a treaty was concluded on the 20th of October, in which the claims of the United States, on the important points of boundary, and the Mississippi, were fully conceded.

Eventually, Spain, feeling awkward about the war she was involved in, showed signs of being more open to compromise and indicated to the secretary of state, through her representatives in Philadelphia, that a higher-ranking minister than Mr. Short, who was already there, would be able to speed up the negotiations. Upon receiving this message, the President, while still having a strong and rightful confidence in Mr. Short, appointed Mr. Pinckney in November 1794 as the extraordinary envoy to his Catholic Majesty. Mr. Pinckney traveled to Madrid the following summer, and a treaty was signed on October 20th, in which the United States’ claims regarding important boundary issues and the Mississippi River were fully acknowledged.

Thus were adjusted, so far as depended on the executive, all those external difficulties with which the United States had long struggled; most of which had originated before the establishment of the existing government, and some of which portended calamities that no common share of prudence could have averted.

Thus were adjusted, as far as it relied on the executive, all those external challenges that the United States had long faced; most of which began before the current government was formed, and some of which threatened disasters that no reasonable amount of caution could have prevented.

Meeting of Congress.

Although the signature of the treaties with Spain and Algiers had not been officially announced at the meeting of congress, the state of the negotiations with both powers was sufficiently well understood to enable the President with confidence to assure the legislature, in his speech at the opening of the session, that those negotiations were in a train which promised a happy issue.

Although the signing of the treaties with Spain and Algiers hadn't been officially announced at the congress meeting, the status of the negotiations with both countries was clear enough for the President to confidently assure the legislature during his speech at the start of the session that those negotiations were progressing favorably.

President's speech.

After expressing his gratification at the prosperous state of American affairs, the various favourable events which have been already enumerated were detailed in a succinct statement, at the close of which he mentioned the British treaty, which, though publicly known, had not before been communicated officially to the house of representatives.

After expressing his satisfaction with the successful state of American affairs, he gave a brief overview of the various positive events that had already been mentioned. At the end of this, he brought up the British treaty, which, although it was publicly known, had not been officially shared with the House of Representatives before.

"This interesting summary of our affairs," continued the speech, "with regard to the powers between whom and the United States controversies have subsisted; and with regard also to our Indian neighbours with whom we have been in a state of enmity or misunderstanding, opens a wide field for consoling and gratifying reflections. If by prudence and moderation on every side, the extinguishment of all the causes of external discord which have heretofore menaced our tranquillity, on terms compatible with our national faith and honour, shall be the happy results,—how firm and how precious a foundation will have been laid for accelerating, maturing, and establishing the prosperity of our country."

"This interesting summary of our situation," the speech continued, "regarding the powers with which the United States has had disputes, and also concerning our Indian neighbors with whom we have faced conflict or misunderstanding, opens up a vast opportunity for comforting and satisfying thoughts. If, through prudence and moderation from all sides, we can eliminate all the causes of external discord that have previously threatened our peace, on terms that align with our national principles and honor, what a strong and valuable foundation will have been established for promoting, developing, and securing the prosperity of our country."

After presenting an animated picture of the situation of the United States, and recommending several objects to the attention of the legislature, the President concluded with observing: "Temperate discussion of the important subjects that may arise in the course of the session, and mutual forbearance where there is a difference in opinion, are too obvious and necessary for the peace, happiness, and welfare of our country, to need any recommendation of mine."

After giving a lively overview of the state of the United States and suggesting several issues for the legislature to consider, the President ended by saying: "Calm discussions about the important topics that might come up during the session, and patience with differences in opinion, are so clear and essential for the peace, happiness, and well-being of our country that they don’t require any suggestion from me."

In the senate, an address was reported which echoed back the sentiments of the speech.

In the Senate, a report was presented that reflected the feelings expressed in the speech.

In this house of representatives, as in the last, the party in opposition to the administration had obtained a majority. This party was unanimously hostile to the treaty with Great Britain; and it was expected that their answer to the speech of the President would indicate their sentiments on a subject which continued to agitate the whole American people. The answer reported by the committee contained a declaration, that the confidence of his fellow citizens in the chief magistrate remained undiminished.

In this House of Representatives, just like in the last one, the party opposing the administration had a majority. This party was entirely against the treaty with Great Britain, and it was anticipated that their response to the President’s speech would show their views on a matter that continued to stir the entire American public. The response reported by the committee included a statement that the trust of his fellow citizens in the President remained strong.

On a motion, to strike out the words importing this sentiment, it was averred, that the clause asserted an untruth. It was not true that the confidence of the people in the President was undiminished. By a recent transaction it had been considerably impaired; and some gentlemen declared that their own confidence in him was lessened.

On a motion to remove the words expressing this sentiment, it was claimed that the clause stated something false. It wasn't true that the people's confidence in the President remained unchanged. A recent event had seriously damaged it, and some individuals stated that their own confidence in him had decreased.

By the friends of the administration, the motion was opposed with great zeal, and the opinion that the confidence of the people in their chief magistrate remained unshaken, was maintained with ardour. But they were outnumbered.

By the supporters of the administration, the motion was opposed with great enthusiasm, and the belief that the people's confidence in their chief magistrate was still strong was argued passionately. However, they were outnumbered.

To avoid a direct vote on the proposition, it was moved, that the address should be recommitted. This motion succeeded, and, two members being added to the committee, an answer was reported in which the clause objected to was so modified as to be free from exception.

To prevent a direct vote on the proposal, it was suggested that the address should be sent back for further consideration. This motion passed, and with two new members added to the committee, a revised answer was submitted in which the disputed clause was changed enough to resolve any objections.

That part of the speech which mentioned the treaty with Great Britain was alluded to in terms which, though not directly expressive of disapprobation, were sufficiently indicative of the prevailing sentiment.

That part of the speech that talked about the treaty with Great Britain was referred to in ways that, while not directly showing disapproval, clearly indicated the general feeling.

Early in the month of January the President transmitted to both houses of congress a message, accompanying certain communications from the French government which were well calculated to cherish those ardent feelings that prevailed in the legislature.

Early in January, the President sent a message to both houses of Congress, along with some communications from the French government that were likely to boost the strong sentiments that existed in the legislature.

It was the fortune of Mr. Monroe to reach Paris, soon after the death of Robespierre, and the fall of the Jacobins. On his reception as the minister of the United States, which was public, and in the convention, he gave free scope to the genuine feelings of his heart; and, at the same time, delivered to the President of that body, with his credentials, two letters addressed by the secretary of state to the committee of public safety. These letters were answers to one written by the committee of safety to the congress of the United States. The executive department being the organ through which all foreign intercourse was to be conducted, each branch of the legislature had passed a resolution directing this letter to be transmitted to the President, with a request, that he would cause it to be answered in terms expressive of their friendly dispositions towards the French republic.

It was Mr. Monroe's good fortune to arrive in Paris shortly after the death of Robespierre and the downfall of the Jacobins. When he was welcomed as the minister of the United States, which was a public event in the convention, he openly expressed his true feelings. At the same time, he handed the President of that body, along with his credentials, two letters from the secretary of state addressed to the committee of public safety. These letters were responses to one sent by the committee of safety to the Congress of the United States. Since the executive branch was responsible for all foreign interactions, each part of the legislature had passed a resolution directing that this letter be sent to the President, asking him to reply in a way that showed their friendly intentions toward the French republic.

So fervent were the sentiments expressed on this occasion, that the convention decreed that the flag of the American and French republics should be united together, and suspended in its own hall, in testimony of eternal union and friendship between the two people. To evince the impression made on his mind by this act, and the grateful sense of his constituents, Mr. Monroe presented to the convention the flag of the United States, which he prayed them to accept as a proof of the sensibility with which his country received every act of friendship from its ally, and of the pleasure with which it cherished every incident which tended to cement and consolidate the union between the two nations.

So strong were the emotions expressed on this occasion that the convention decided to unite the flags of the American and French republics and display them in their hall as a symbol of the lasting union and friendship between the two nations. To show the impact this had on him and the gratitude of his constituents, Mr. Monroe presented the convention with the flag of the United States, asking them to accept it as proof of how deeply his country appreciated every act of friendship from its ally and how much it valued every event that helped strengthen the bond between the two nations.

Mr. Adet succeeds Mr. Fauchet.

The committee of safety, disregarding the provisions of the American constitution, although their attention must have been particularly directed to them by the circumstance that the letter to congress was referred by that body to the executive, again addressed the legislature in terms adapted to that department of government which superintends its foreign intercourse, and expressive, among other sentiments, of the sensibility with which the French nation had perceived those sympathetic emotions with which the American people had viewed the vicissitudes of her fortune. Mr. Adet, who was to succeed Mr. Fauchet at Philadelphia, and who was the bearer of this letter, also brought with him the colours of France, which he was directed to present to the United States. He arrived in the summer; but probably in the idea that these communications were to be made by him directly to congress, did not announce them to the executive until late in December.

The safety committee, ignoring the rules of the American constitution, even though they must have been particularly aware of them since Congress had referred the letter to the executive, addressed the legislature again in a manner suited to the part of the government that manages foreign relations. They expressed, among other feelings, the appreciation the French nation had for the sympathetic emotions the American people had shown regarding the ups and downs of France's situation. Mr. Adet, who was set to take over from Mr. Fauchet in Philadelphia and delivered this letter, also brought the colors of France, which he was instructed to present to the United States. He arrived in the summer but, likely thinking these communications were to be made directly to Congress, did not inform the executive until late December.

1796

The first day of the new year was named for their reception; when the colours were delivered to the President, and the letter to congress also was placed in his hands.

The first day of the new year was named for their reception; when the colors were delivered to the President, and the letter to Congress was also handed to him.

In executing this duty, Mr. Adet addressed a speech to the President, which, in the glowing language of his country, represented France as struggling, not only for her own liberty, but for that of the human race. "Assimilated to, or rather identified with free people by the form of her government, she saw in them," he said, "only friends and brothers. Long accustomed to regard the American people as her most faithful allies, she sought to draw closer the ties already formed in the fields of America, under the auspices of victory, over the ruins of tyranny."

In carrying out this duty, Mr. Adet gave a speech to the President, which, in the vivid language of his country, portrayed France as fighting not just for its own freedom, but for the freedom of all humanity. "Connected to, or rather united with free nations through the structure of her government, she viewed them," he said, "as nothing but friends and allies. Having long seen the American people as her most loyal partners, she aimed to strengthen the bonds that were already created in America’s fields, under the banner of victory, against the remnants of tyranny."

To answer this speech was a task of some delicacy. It was necessary to express feelings adapted to the occasion, without implying sentiments with respect to the belligerent powers, which might be improper to be used by the chief magistrate of a neutral country. With a view to both these objects, the President made the following reply:

To respond to this speech was a bit tricky. It was important to convey feelings suitable for the occasion without suggesting any opinions about the warring nations that might be inappropriate for the leader of a neutral country. To achieve both of these goals, the President gave the following reply:

"Born, sir, in a land of liberty; having early learned its value; having engaged in a perilous conflict to defend it; having, in a word, devoted the best years of my life to secure its permanent establishment in my own country; my anxious recollections, my sympathetic feelings, and my best wishes, are irresistibly attracted, whensoever, in any country, I see an oppressed nation unfurl the banners of freedom. But above all, the events of the French revolution have produced the deepest solicitude, as well as the highest admiration. To call your nation brave, were to pronounce but common praise. Wonderful people! Ages to come will read with astonishment the history of your brilliant exploits. I rejoice that the period of your toils, and of your immense sacrifices is approaching. I rejoice that the interesting revolutionary movements of so many years have issued in the formation of a constitution,[40] designed to give permanency to the great object for which you have contended. I rejoice that liberty, which you have so long embraced with enthusiasm,—liberty, of which you have been the invincible defenders, now finds an asylum in the bosom of a regularly organized government;—a government which, being formed to secure the happiness of the French people, corresponds with the ardent wishes of my heart, while it gratifies the pride of every citizen of the United States by its resemblance to their own. On these glorious events, accept, sir, my sincere congratulations.

"Born, sir, in a land of freedom; having learned its value early on; having engaged in a risky struggle to defend it; having, in short, dedicated the best years of my life to securing its lasting establishment in my own country; my anxious memories, my empathetic feelings, and my best wishes are irresistibly drawn every time I see an oppressed nation raise the banners of freedom in any country. But above all, the events of the French Revolution have caused me the deepest concern, as well as the highest admiration. To call your nation brave would be just stating the obvious. Wonderful people! Future generations will be amazed when they read about your incredible feats. I am glad that the time of your struggles and immense sacrifices is coming to an end. I am happy that the remarkable revolutionary movements of many years have resulted in the creation of a constitution,[40] designed to ensure the permanence of the great cause for which you have fought. I am thrilled that the liberty you have embraced with passion for so long—liberty, of which you have been the unwavering defenders—now finds a home within a well-organized government; a government formed to ensure the happiness of the French people, aligning with the heartfelt wishes of my own heart, while also satisfying the pride of every American citizen by resembling their own. Regarding these glorious events, please accept my sincere congratulations, sir."

"In delivering to you these sentiments, I express not my own feelings only, but those of my fellow citizens in relation to the commencement, the progress, and the issue of the French revolution: and they will certainly join with me in purest wishes to the Supreme Being, that the citizens of our sister republic, our magnanimous allies, may soon enjoy in peace, that liberty which they have purchased at so great a price, and all the happiness that liberty can bestow.

"In sharing these thoughts with you, I convey not only my own feelings but also those of my fellow citizens regarding the start, the development, and the outcome of the French revolution. They will undoubtedly join me in the sincerest hopes to the Supreme Being that the citizens of our sister republic, our noble allies, may soon enjoy, in peace, the freedom they have fought for at such a high cost, along with all the happiness that freedom can bring."

"I receive, sir, with lively sensibility, the symbol of the triumphs, and of the infranchisements of your nation, the colours of France, which you have now presented to the United States. The transaction will be announced to congress, and the colours will be deposited with the archives of the United States, which are at once the evidence and the memorials of their freedom and independence; may these be perpetual! and may the friendship of the two republics be commensurate with their existence."

"I gladly accept, sir, with deep appreciation, the symbol of your nation's victories and freedoms, the colors of France, which you have now presented to the United States. This event will be reported to Congress, and the colors will be stored with the archives of the United States, which serve as both proof and remembrance of their freedom and independence; may these be everlasting! And may the friendship between the two republics last as long as they exist."

The address of Mr. Adet, the answer of the President, and the colours of France, were transmitted to congress with the letter from the committee of safety.

The address from Mr. Adet, the President's response, and the colors of France were sent to Congress along with the letter from the committee of safety.

In the house of representatives a resolution was moved, requesting the President to make known to the representatives of the French republic, the sincere and lively sensations which were excited by this honourable testimony of the existing sympathy and affections of the two republics; that the house rejoiced in an opportunity of congratulating the French republic on the brilliant and glorious achievements accomplished during the present afflictive war; and hoped that those achievements would be attended with a perfect attainment of their object, the permanent establishment of the liberty and happiness of that great and magnanimous people.

In the House of Representatives, a resolution was proposed, asking the President to convey to the representatives of the French Republic the genuine and strong feelings stirred by this honorable acknowledgment of the existing goodwill and affection between the two republics. The House expressed its joy at the chance to congratulate the French Republic on the remarkable and glorious achievements made during this difficult war, and hoped that these accomplishments would lead to the complete realization of their goal: the lasting establishment of the liberty and happiness of that great and noble people.

The letter to congress having come from the committee of safety, which, under the revolutionary system, was the department that was charged with foreign intercourse; and a constitution having been afterwards adopted in France, by which an executive directory was established, to which all the foreign relations of the government were confided, an attempt was made to amend this resolution, by substituting the directory for the representatives of the people. But this attempt failed; after which the resolution passed unanimously.

The letter to Congress came from the Committee of Safety, which, under the revolutionary system, handled foreign affairs. Afterwards, a constitution was adopted in France that established an executive directory in charge of all foreign relations of the government. An attempt was made to amend this resolution by replacing the representatives of the people with the directory. However, this attempt failed, and the resolution passed unanimously.

In the senate also a resolution was offered, expressive of the sensations of that house, and requesting the President to communicate them to the proper organ of the French republic. An amendment was moved to vary this resolution so as to express the sentiment to the President, and omit the request that it should be communicated to the French republic. The complimentary correspondence between the two nations, had, it was said, reached a point, when, if ever, it ought to close. This amendment, though strenuously combated by the opposition, was adopted.

In the Senate, a resolution was introduced that reflected the feelings of that chamber and asked the President to relay them to the appropriate officials in the French Republic. An amendment was proposed to change the resolution to express the feelings directly to the President, removing the request for communication with the French Republic. It was argued that the friendly correspondence between the two nations had reached a point where, if ever, it should come to an end. This amendment, despite strong opposition, was approved.

In February, the treaty with Great Britain was returned, in the form advised by the senate, ratified by his Britannic Majesty. The constitution declaring a treaty, when made, the supreme law of the land, the President announced it officially to the people in a proclamation, requiring from all persons its observance and execution; a copy of which was transmitted to each house on the 1st of March.

In February, the treaty with Great Britain was brought back, in the form recommended by the Senate, approved by His Britannic Majesty. The constitution states that a treaty, once made, is the highest law of the land, so the President officially announced it to the public in a proclamation, demanding everyone to observe and carry it out; a copy of which was sent to each house on March 1st.

The party which had obtained the majority in one branch of the legislature, having openly denied the right of the President to negotiate a treaty of commerce, was not a little dissatisfied at his venturing to issue this proclamation before the sense of the house of representatives had been declared on the obligation of the instrument.

The party that had a majority in one branch of the legislature, having openly denied the President's right to negotiate a trade treaty, was quite unhappy that he dared to issue this proclamation before the House of Representatives had expressed its opinion on the validity of the agreement.

The house of representatives call upon the president for papers relating to the treaty with Great Britain.

This dissatisfaction was not concealed. On the 2d of March, Mr. Livingston laid upon the table a resolution, requesting the President "to lay before the house a copy of the instructions to the minister of the United States, who negotiated the treaty with the king of Great Britain, communicated by his message of the 1st of March, together with the correspondence and other documents relative to the said treaty."

This dissatisfaction was out in the open. On March 2nd, Mr. Livingston presented a resolution, asking the President "to provide the House with a copy of the instructions given to the U.S. minister who negotiated the treaty with the King of Great Britain, as mentioned in his message on March 1st, along with the correspondence and other documents related to that treaty."

On the 7th of March, he amended this resolution by adding the words, "excepting such of the said papers as any existing negotiation may render improper to be disclosed."

On March 7th, he changed this decision by adding the words, "except for any of the mentioned papers that any ongoing negotiation may make inappropriate to disclose."

After some debate, Mr. Madison proposed to modify the amendment of Mr. Livingston, so as to except such papers, as in the judgment of the President, it might be inconsistent with the interest of the United States at this time to disclose. This proposition was rejected by a majority of ten voices, and the discussion of the original resolution was resumed. The debate soon glided into an argument on the nature and extent of the treaty making power.

After some discussion, Mr. Madison suggested changing Mr. Livingston's amendment to exclude certain documents that, in the President's view, it might not be in the best interest of the United States to reveal at this time. This proposal was rejected by a majority of ten votes, and they returned to discussing the original resolution. The conversation quickly shifted into a debate about the nature and scope of the treaty-making power.

The friends of the administration maintained, that a treaty was a contract between two nations, which, under the constitution, the President, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, had a right to make; and that it was made when, by and with such advice and consent, it had received his final act. Its obligations then became complete on the United States; and to refuse to comply with its stipulations, was to break the treaty, and to violate the faith of the nation.

The supporters of the administration argued that a treaty is a contract between two nations, which, according to the constitution, the President can negotiate with the advice and consent of the Senate. It is considered completed when it has received his final approval with that advice and consent. At that point, the obligations become binding on the United States; therefore, refusing to follow its terms would be breaking the treaty and betraying the nation’s trust.

The opposition contended, that the power to make treaties, if applicable to every object, conflicted with powers which were vested exclusively in congress. That either the treaty making power must be limited in its operation, so as not to touch objects committed by the constitution to congress, or the assent and co-operation of the house of representatives must be required to give validity to any compact, so far as it might comprehend those objects. A treaty, therefore, which required an appropriation of money, or any act of congress to carry it into effect, had not acquired its obligatory force until the house of representatives had exercised its powers in the case. They were at full liberty to make, or to withhold, such appropriation, or other law, without incurring the imputation of violating any existing obligation, or of breaking the faith of the nation.

The opposition argued that the power to make treaties, if applicable to everything, conflicted with powers that were exclusively given to Congress. Either the treaty-making power needs to be limited so it doesn't interfere with matters assigned to Congress by the Constitution, or the consent and collaboration of the House of Representatives must be required to validate any agreement that includes those matters. Therefore, a treaty that needed funding or any act of Congress to be implemented did not hold binding authority until the House of Representatives had exercised its powers in the matter. They had the freedom to approve or deny such funding or other legislation without facing accusations of violating any existing obligation or breaking the nation’s trust.

The debate on this question was animated, vehement, and argumentative; all the party passions were enlisted in it; and it was protracted until the 24th of March, when the resolution was carried in the affirmative by sixty-two to thirty-seven voices. The next day, the committee appointed to present it to the chief magistrate reported his answer, which was, "that he would take the resolution into consideration."

The discussion on this issue was lively, intense, and full of arguments; all party emotions were involved in it; and it went on until March 24th, when the resolution was passed with a vote of sixty-two to thirty-seven. The following day, the committee tasked with presenting it to the chief official reported his response, which was, "that he would consider the resolution."

The situation in which this vote placed the President was peculiarly delicate. In an elective government, the difficulty of resisting the popular branch of the legislature is at all times great, but is particularly so when the passions of the public have been strongly and generally excited. The popularity of a demand for information, the large majority by which that demand was supported, the additional force which a refusal to comply with it would give to suspicions already insinuated, that circumstances had occurred in the negotiation which the administration dared not expose, and that the President was separating himself from the representatives of the people, furnished motives, not lightly to be over-ruled, for yielding to the request which had been made.

The situation this vote put the President in was especially tricky. In an elected government, it's always challenging to oppose the popular branch of the legislature, but it’s even harder when public emotions are running high. The strong demand for information, the wide majority supporting that demand, and the added suspicion that refusing to provide it would raise doubts about the administration's transparency—suggesting there were issues in the negotiations that the President was trying to hide—made it clear that he was distancing himself from the people's representatives. These factors provided compelling reasons not to ignore the request that had been made.

 

George Washington

George Washington

From the profile portrait by James Sharples

From the profile portrait by James Sharples

Sharples painted two pictures of Washington—this portrait showing him in the costume of a country gentleman, distinguished as being the only profile of the First President ever painted, and a full face presentation of him in military dress, reproduced in Volume IV of this work.

Sharples created two portraits of Washington—one showing him in the attire of a country gentleman, noted as the only profile of the First President ever painted, and another presenting him in military dress, featured in Volume IV of this work.

Sharples, an English painter by birth, was recommended by the great George Romney as being equipped to produce a work "worthy of the greatest of Americans." His success is attested by the praise of Washington's adopted son, who declared the Sharples portraits to be "the truest likenesses ever made," and by Ralph Waldo Emerson, who saw the pictures later in England and wrote: "I would willingly have crossed the Atlantic, if only to look on these portraits."

Sharples, an English painter by birth, was recommended by the famous George Romney as someone capable of creating a work "worthy of the greatest Americans." His success is confirmed by the praise of Washington's adopted son, who claimed the Sharples portraits to be "the truest likenesses ever made," and by Ralph Waldo Emerson, who saw the portraits later in England and wrote: "I would gladly have crossed the Atlantic just to see these portraits."

Courtesy Herbert L. Pratt

Courtesy of Herbert L. Pratt

 

But these considerations were opposed by others which, though less operative with men who fear to deserve the public favour by hazarding its loss, possess an irresistible influence over a mind resolved to pursue steadily the path of duty, however it may abound with thorns.

But these thoughts were countered by others which, although less impactful for those who are afraid to lose public approval by risking it, have an undeniable effect on a mind committed to consistently following the path of duty, no matter how thorny it may be.

That the future diplomatic transactions of the government might be seriously and permanently affected by establishing the principle that the house of representatives could demand as a right, the instructions given to a foreign minister, and all the papers connected with a negotiation, was too apparent to be unobserved. Nor was it less obvious that a compliance with the request now made, would go far in establishing this principle. The form of the request, and the motives which induced it, equally led to this conclusion. It left nothing to the discretion of the President with regard to the public interests; and the information was asked for the avowed purpose of determining whether the house of representatives would give effect to a public treaty.

That the future diplomatic actions of the government could be seriously and permanently impacted by setting the precedent that the House of Representatives could demand, as a right, the instructions given to a foreign minister and all documents related to a negotiation was too obvious to ignore. It was equally clear that agreeing to the request now made would significantly contribute to establishing this principle. The nature of the request and the motives behind it pointed to this conclusion. It left no room for the President to make decisions regarding the public interest; the information was requested for the stated purpose of determining whether the House of Representatives would enforce a public treaty.

It was also a subject for serious reflection, that in a debate unusually elaborate, the house of representatives had claimed a right of interference in the formation of treaties, which, in the judgment of the President, the constitution had denied them. Duties the most sacred requiring that he should resist this encroachment on the department which was particularly confided to him, he could not hesitate respecting the course it became him to take; and on the 30th of March he returned the following answer to the resolution which had been presented to him.

It was also a serious topic for reflection that, in an unusually detailed debate, the House of Representatives had asserted a right to interfere with the formation of treaties, which, according to the President, the Constitution had denied them. With the most important responsibilities requiring him to push back against this intrusion on the department specifically entrusted to him, he had no doubt about the course he needed to take; and on March 30th, he provided the following response to the resolution that had been presented to him.

"Gentlemen of the house of representatives,

"Gentlemen of the House of Representatives,

"With the utmost attention I have considered your resolution of the 24th instant, requesting me to lay before your house, a copy of the instructions to the minister of the United States, who negotiated the treaty with the king of Great Britain, together with the correspondence and other documents relative to that treaty, excepting such of the said papers, as any existing negotiation may render improper to be disclosed.

"With great care, I've reviewed your resolution from the 24th of this month, asking me to present to your house a copy of the instructions given to the U.S. minister who negotiated the treaty with the king of Great Britain, along with the correspondence and other documents related to that treaty, excluding any papers that could be deemed inappropriate to disclose due to ongoing negotiations."

"In deliberating upon this subject, it was impossible for me to lose sight of the principle which some have avowed in its discussion, or to avoid extending my views to the consequences which must flow from the admission of that principle.

"In discussing this topic, I couldn’t ignore the principle that some have openly stated in this conversation, nor could I avoid considering the consequences that must arise from accepting that principle."

"I trust that no part of my conduct has ever indicated a disposition to withhold any information which the constitution has enjoined it upon the President as a duty to give, or which could be required of him by either house of congress as a right; and with truth I affirm, that it has been, as it will continue to be, while I have the honour to preside in the government, my constant endeavour to harmonize with the other branches thereof, so far as the trust delegated to me by the people of the United States, and my sense of the obligation it imposes, to preserve, protect and defend the constitution[41] will permit.

"I believe that my actions have never shown a tendency to withhold any information that the constitution requires the President to provide, or that either house of Congress can rightfully ask for. I can honestly say that it has been, and will continue to be, my consistent effort to work together with the other branches of government, as much as my responsibility to the people of the United States and my duty to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution will allow."

"The nature of foreign negotiations require caution, and their success must often depend on secrecy: and even when brought to a conclusion, a full disclosure of all the measures, demands, or eventual concessions which may have been proposed or contemplated would be extremely impolitic; for this might have a pernicious influence on future negotiations, or produce immediate inconveniences, perhaps danger and mischief to other persons. The necessity of such caution and secrecy was one cogent reason for vesting the power of making treaties in the President, with the advice and consent of the senate, the principle on which that body was formed confining it to a small number of members.

The nature of foreign negotiations requires caution, and their success often depends on confidentiality. Even after reaching an agreement, fully disclosing all the measures, demands, or potential concessions that were proposed or considered could be very unwise; this could negatively affect future negotiations or create immediate issues, possibly putting others at risk. The need for such caution and secrecy was a strong reason for giving the President the power to make treaties, with the advice and consent of the Senate, a principle based on keeping it limited to a small number of members.

"To admit then a right in the house of representatives to demand, and to have as a matter of course, all the papers respecting a negotiation with a foreign power, would be to establish a dangerous precedent.

"To allow the House of Representatives the right to request and automatically receive all documents related to negotiations with a foreign power would set a dangerous precedent."

"It does not occur that the inspection of the papers asked for, can be relative to any purpose under the cognizance of the house of representatives, except that of an impeachment, which the resolution has not expressed. I repeat that I have no disposition to withhold any information which the duty of my station will permit, or the public good shall require to be disclosed; and in fact, all the papers affecting the negotiation with Great Britain were laid before the senate, when the treaty itself was communicated for their consideration and advice.

"It doesn't happen that the review of the requested documents can relate to any purpose recognized by the House of Representatives, except for impeachment, which the resolution hasn't mentioned. I want to emphasize that I have no intention of keeping back any information that my position allows to be shared or that the public interest requires to be revealed; in fact, all the documents related to the negotiation with Great Britain were presented to the Senate when the treaty was submitted for their consideration and advice."

"The course which the debate has taken on the resolution of the house, leads to some observations on the mode of making treaties under the constitution of the United States.

The direction the debate has taken regarding the house's resolution suggests some thoughts on how treaties are made under the Constitution of the United States.

"Having been a member of the general convention, and knowing the principles on which the constitution was formed, I have ever entertained but one opinion upon this subject; and from the first establishment of the government to this moment, my conduct has exemplified that opinion. That the power of making treaties is exclusively vested in the President, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, provided two-thirds of the senators present concur; and that every treaty so made and promulgated, thenceforward becomes the law of the land. It is thus that the treaty making power has been understood by foreign nations: and in all the treaties made with them, we have declared, and they have believed, that when ratified by the President with the advice and consent of the senate, they became obligatory. In this construction of the constitution, every house of representatives has heretofore acquiesced; and until the present time, not a doubt or suspicion has appeared to my knowledge, that this construction was not a true one. Nay, they have more than acquiesced; for until now, without controverting the obligation of such treaties, they have made all the requisite provisions for carrying them into effect.

"Having been part of the general convention and understanding the principles on which the constitution was created, I have always held the same view on this matter; and from the very beginning of the government until now, my actions have demonstrated that view. The power to make treaties is solely given to the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate, as long as two-thirds of the senators present agree; and any treaty made and proclaimed then becomes the law of the land. This is how foreign nations have understood the treaty-making power: in all the treaties made with them, we have stated, and they have believed, that once ratified by the President with the Senate's advice and consent, they became binding. Every House of Representatives has accepted this interpretation of the constitution up to now, and until this point, I am not aware of any doubts or suspicions about whether this interpretation was correct. In fact, they have not only accepted it; until now, without disputing the obligation of such treaties, they have made all the necessary provisions to ensure their implementation."

"There is also reason to believe that this construction agrees with the opinions entertained by the state conventions when they were deliberating on the constitution; especially by those who objected to it, because there was not required in commercial treaties, the consent of two-thirds of the whole number of the members of the senate, instead of two-thirds of the senators present; and because in treaties respecting territorial and certain other rights and claims, the concurrence of three-fourths of the whole number of the members of both houses respectively was not made necessary.

"There is also reason to think that this interpretation aligns with the views held by the state conventions when they were debating the constitution; particularly by those who opposed it, because commercial treaties didn't require the approval of two-thirds of all the members of the Senate, but rather two-thirds of the senators present; and because in treaties concerning territorial and certain other rights and claims, it wasn't necessary to have the agreement of three-fourths of all members of both houses respectively."

"It is a fact declared by the general convention and universally understood, that the constitution of the United States was the result of a spirit of amity and mutual concession. And it is well known, that under this influence, the smaller states were admitted to an equal representation in the senate with the larger states; and that this branch of the government was invested with great powers; for on the equal participation of those powers, the sovereignty and political safety of the smaller states were deemed essentially to depend.

"It is a fact recognized by the general consensus and widely understood that the Constitution of the United States came about through a spirit of friendship and compromise. It's also well known that, influenced by this, smaller states were granted equal representation in the Senate alongside larger states; and this part of the government was given significant powers, as the sovereignty and political safety of the smaller states were considered to rely crucially on their equal participation in those powers."

"If other proofs than these and the plain letter of the constitution itself be necessary to ascertain the point under consideration, they may be found in the journals of the general convention which I have deposited in the office of the department of state. In these journals it will appear, that a proposition was made 'that no treaty should be binding on the United States which was not ratified by a law,' and that the proposition was explicitly rejected.

"If additional evidence beyond these and the straightforward text of the constitution is needed to clarify the issue at hand, you can find it in the records of the general convention, which I have stored in the state department's office. These records will show that there was a proposal that 'no treaty should be binding on the United States unless ratified by a law,' and that this proposal was clearly rejected."

He declines sending them.

"As therefore it is perfectly clear to my understanding that the assent of the house of representatives is not necessary to the validity of a treaty; as the treaty with Great Britain exhibits in itself all the objects requiring legislative provision; and on these the papers called for can throw no light; and as it is essential to the due administration of the government that the boundaries fixed by the constitution between the different departments should be preserved; a just regard to the constitution, and to the duty of my office, under all the circumstances of this case, forbid a compliance with your request."

"As it's perfectly clear to me that the approval of the House of Representatives isn't required for a treaty to be valid; since the treaty with Great Britain already covers all the issues that need legislative action; and the documents requested won't provide any additional insight; and since it's crucial for the proper functioning of the government to maintain the boundaries set by the constitution between the different branches; a proper respect for the constitution, and the responsibilities of my position in light of all the circumstances in this case, prevent me from agreeing to your request."

The terms in which this decided, and, it would seem, unexpected negative to the call for papers was conveyed, appeared to break the last cord of that attachment which had theretofore bound some of the active leaders of the opposition to the person of the President. Amidst all the agitations and irritations of party, a sincere respect, and real affection for the chief magistrate, the remnant of former friendship, had still lingered in the bosoms of some who had engaged with ardour in the political contests of the day. But, if the last spark of this affection was not now extinguished, it was at least concealed under the more active passions of the moment.

The way this unexpected rejection of the call for papers was communicated seemed to sever the final bond that had previously connected some of the key opposition leaders to the President. Despite all the turmoil and frustrations of the party, a genuine respect and real affection for the Chief Executive still existed in the hearts of some who had passionately participated in the political battles of the time. However, if the last flicker of this affection wasn't completely gone, it was at least hidden beneath the stronger emotions of the moment.

Debates upon the treaty making power.

A motion to refer the message of the President to a committee of the whole house, was carried by a large majority. In committee, resolutions were moved by Mr. Blount of North Carolina, declaratory of the sense of the house respecting its own power on the subject of treaties. These resolutions take a position less untenable than had been maintained in argument, and rather inexplicit on an essential part of the question. Disclaiming a power to interfere in making treaties, they assert the right of the house of representatives, whenever stipulations are made on subjects committed by the constitution to congress, to deliberate on the expediency of carrying them into effect, without deciding what degree of obligation the treaty possesses on the nation, so far as respects those points, previous to such deliberation. After a debate in which the message was freely criticised, the resolutions were carried, fifty-seven voting in the affirmative, and thirty-five in the negative.

A motion to send the President's message to a committee of the whole house was approved by a large majority. In the committee, Mr. Blount from North Carolina introduced resolutions expressing the house's position on its own power regarding treaties. These resolutions presented a less defensible stance than previously argued and were somewhat vague about a key part of the issue. While denying any power to interfere in treaty-making, they claimed the right of the House of Representatives to discuss the practicality of implementing agreements concerning areas assigned to Congress by the Constitution, without deciding the level of obligation these treaties hold for the nation regarding those matters before such discussions take place. After a debate where the message was openly criticized, the resolutions passed, with fifty-seven voting in favor and thirty-five against.

In the course of the month of March, the treaties with his Catholic majesty, and with the Dey of Algiers, had been ratified by the President, and were laid before congress. On the 13th of April, in a committee of the whole house on the state of the union, the instant the chairman was seated, Mr. Sedgewick moved "that provision ought to be made by law for carrying into effect with good faith the treaties lately concluded with the Dey and Regency of Algiers, the King of Great Britain, the King of Spain, and certain Indian tribes north-west of the Ohio."

In March, the treaties with the Catholic monarch and the Dey of Algiers were ratified by the President and presented to Congress. On April 13th, during a committee meeting of the whole House regarding the state of the union, as soon as the chairman took his seat, Mr. Sedgewick proposed "that we should create a law to ensure that we honorably implement the treaties recently signed with the Dey and Regency of Algiers, the King of Great Britain, the King of Spain, and several Native American tribes northwest of the Ohio."

This motion produced a warm altercation. The members of the majority complained loudly of the celerity with which it had been made, and resented the attempt to blend together four treaties in the same resolution, after the solemn vote entered upon their journals, declaratory of their right to exercise a free discretion over the subject, as an indignity to the opinions and feelings of the house.

This motion sparked a heated argument. The majority members loudly complained about how quickly it was brought up and were upset by the attempt to combine four treaties into the same resolution, especially after the formal vote that was recorded, stating their right to make a decision freely on the matter, which they saw as a disregard for the opinions and feelings of the house.

After a discussion manifesting the irritation which existed, the resolution was amended, by changing the word "treaties" from the plural to the singular number, and by striking out the words "Dey and Regency of Algiers, the King of Great Britain, and certain Indian tribes north-west of the river Ohio," so that only the treaty with the King of Spain remained to be considered.

After a discussion that showed the existing irritation, the resolution was revised by changing the word "treaties" from plural to singular and by removing the phrase "Dey and Regency of Algiers, the King of Great Britain, and certain Indian tribes north-west of the river Ohio," so that only the treaty with the King of Spain was left to be considered.

Mr. Gallatin then objected to the words "provision ought to be made by law," as the expression seemed to imply a negative of the principle laid down in their resolution, that the house was at perfect liberty to pass, or not to pass, any law for giving effect to a treaty. In lieu of them, he wished to introduce words declaring the expediency of passing the necessary laws. This amendment was objected to as an innovation on the forms which had been invariably observed; but it was carried; after which, the words "with good faith," were also discarded.

Mr. Gallatin then opposed the phrase "provision ought to be made by law," as it seemed to contradict the principle stated in their resolution, which asserted that the house was completely free to pass or not pass any law to implement a treaty. Instead, he wanted to suggest wording that emphasized the importance of passing the necessary laws. This amendment was challenged as a break from the established procedures that had always been followed; however, it was approved. After that, the phrase "with good faith" was also removed.

The resolution thus amended was agreed to without a dissenting voice; and then, similar resolutions were passed respecting the treaties with Algiers, and with the Indians north-west of the Ohio.

The amended resolution was unanimously approved; then, similar resolutions were passed regarding the treaties with Algiers and the tribes north-west of the Ohio.

Upon the bill for making appropriations to carry into execution the treaty with Great Britain.

This business being despatched, the treaty with Great Britain was brought before the house. The friends of that instrument urged an immediate decision of the question. On a subject which had so long agitated the whole community, the judgment of every member, they believed, was completely formed; and the hope to make converts by argument was desperate. In fact, they appeared to have entertained the opinion that the majority would not dare to encounter the immense responsibility of breaking that treaty, without previously ascertaining that the great body of the people were willing to meet the consequences of the measure. But the members of the opposition, though confident of their power to reject the resolution, called for its discussion. The expectation might not unreasonably have been entertained, that the passions belonging to the subject would be so inflamed by debate, as to produce the expression of a public sentiment favourable to their wishes; and, if in this they should be disappointed, it would be certainly unwise, either as a party, or as a branch of the legislature, to plunge the nation into embarrassments in which it was not disposed to entangle itself, and from which the means of extricating it could not be distinctly perceived.

With this matter settled, the treaty with Great Britain was presented to the house. Supporters of the treaty pushed for a quick decision on the issue. Given that this topic had stirred up the entire community for so long, they believed that every member’s opinion was already fully formed; any hope of changing minds through debate seemed futile. They appeared to think that the majority would hesitate to take on the huge responsibility of breaking the treaty without first confirming that most people were ready to face the consequences. However, the opposition members, confident in their ability to block the resolution, requested a discussion. It was reasonable to expect that the emotions surrounding the issue would become so heightened during the debate that it would generate public sentiment in their favor; and if they were wrong about this, it would be unwise for either their party or the legislature to lead the nation into difficulties it didn’t want to face, especially when the ways to resolve those difficulties were unclear.

The minority soon desisted from urging an immediate decision of the question; and the spacious field which was opened by the propositions before the house, seemed to be entered with equal avidity and confidence by both parties.

The minority quickly stopped pushing for an immediate decision on the matter; and the wide-ranging opportunity created by the proposals before the house appeared to be embraced with equal eagerness and assurance by both sides.

At no time perhaps have the members of the national legislature been stimulated to great exertions by stronger feelings than impelled them on this occasion. Never has a greater display been made of argument, of eloquence, and of passion; and never has a subject been discussed in which all classes of their fellow citizens took a deeper interest.

At no time, perhaps, have the members of the national legislature been motivated to work harder by stronger emotions than they were on this occasion. Never has there been a greater show of argument, eloquence, and passion; and never has a topic been debated that captured the interest of all classes of their fellow citizens more deeply.

To those motives which a doubtful contest for power, and for victory, can not fail to furnish, were added others of vast influence on the human mind. Those who supported the resolution, declaring the expediency of carrying the treaty into effect, firmly believed that the faith of the nation was pledged, and that its honour, its character, and its constitution, depended on the vote about to be given. They also believed that the best interests of the United States required an observance of the compact as formed. In itself, it was thought as favourable as the situation of the contracting parties, and of the world, entitled them to expect; but its chief merit consisted in the adjustment of ancient differences, and in its tendency to produce future amicable dispositions, and friendly intercourse. If congress should refuse to perform this treaty on the part of the United States, a compliance on the part of Great Britain could not be expected. The posts on the great lakes would still be occupied by their garrisons; no compensation would be made for American vessels illegally captured; the hostile dispositions which had been excited would be restored with increased aggravation; and that these dispositions must lead infallibly to war, was implicitly believed. They also believed that the political subjugation of their country would be the inevitable consequence of a war with Britain, during the existing impassioned devotion of the United States to France.

To the motives presented by a questionable struggle for power and victory, there were added other factors that greatly influence the human mind. Those who supported the resolution to carry out the treaty believed that the nation's integrity was at stake, and that its honor, character, and constitution depended on the upcoming vote. They also believed that the best interests of the United States required honoring the agreement as it was initially made. It was seen as reasonable given the circumstances of the parties involved and the global situation, but its main value was in resolving old conflicts and fostering future friendly relationships and interactions. If Congress refused to honor this treaty for the United States, it was unlikely that Great Britain would comply. Their garrisons would still occupy the posts on the Great Lakes; there would be no compensation for American vessels unlawfully seized; the hostility that had been stirred up would return with even more intensity; and it was widely believed that these tensions would inevitably lead to war. They also believed that a war with Britain would result in the political domination of their country, especially during the current fervent loyalty of the United States to France.

The opposite party was undoubtedly of opinion that the treaty contained stipulations really injurious to the United States. Several favourite principles to which they attached much importance, were relinquished by it; and some of the articles relative to commerce, were believed to be unequal in their operation. Nor ought the sincerity with which their opinion on the constitutional powers of the house had been advanced, to be questioned. In the fervour of political discussion, that construction which, without incurring the imputation of violating the national faith, would enable the popular branch of the legislature to control the President and senate in making treaties, may have been thought the safe and the correct construction. But no consideration appears to have had more influence than the apprehension that the amicable arrangements made with Great Britain, would seriously affect the future relations of the United States with France.

The opposing party clearly believed that the treaty included terms that were genuinely harmful to the United States. They gave up several key principles that they valued highly, and some of the clauses related to commerce were seen as unfair. Also, the sincerity of their views on the constitutional powers of the house should not be doubted. In the heat of political debate, the interpretation that would allow the House, without being accused of breaching national trust, to influence the President and Senate in treaty-making might have seemed like a safe and correct interpretation. However, it seems that no factor was more significant than the concern that the friendly agreements made with Great Britain would negatively impact the future relationship between the United States and France.

Might a conjecture on this subject be hazarded, it would be that, in the opinion of many intelligent men, the preservation of that honest and real neutrality between the belligerent powers, at which the executive had aimed, was impracticable; that America would probably be forced into the war; and that the possibility of a rupture with France was a calamity too tremendous not to be avoided at every hazard.

If one were to guess on this topic, it would be that many smart people believe maintaining a true and fair neutrality between the fighting countries, as the administration intended, was impossible; that America would likely be pushed into the war; and that the chance of a breakup with France was a disaster too serious to risk at any cost.

As had been foreseen, this animated debate was on a subject too deeply and immediately interesting to the people, not to draw forth their real sentiments. The whole country was agitated; meetings were again held throughout the United States; and the strength of parties was once more tried.

As expected, this lively debate was on a topic that was too important and relevant to the people to not reveal their true feelings. The entire country was stirred up; meetings were once again held across the United States; and the strength of political parties was tested once more.

The fallacy of many of the objections to the treaty had been exposed, the odium originally excited against it had been diminished, the belief that its violation would infallibly precipitate the nation into a war, if not universal, was extensive. These considerations brought reflecting men into action; and the voice of the nation was pronounced unequivocally with the minority in the house of representatives.

The flaws in many of the objections to the treaty had been revealed, the negative feelings toward it had lessened, and the belief that breaking it would definitely lead the nation into a war, potentially a global one, was widespread. These factors pushed thoughtful individuals to take action, and the nation's stance was clearly aligned with the minority in the House of Representatives.

This manifestation of the public sentiment was decisive with congress. On the 29th of April the question was taken in the committee of the whole, and was determined, by the casting vote of the chairman, in favour of the expediency of making the necessary laws. The resolution was finally carried, fifty-one voting in the affirmative, and forty-eight in the negative.

This expression of public opinion was crucial for Congress. On April 29th, the matter was discussed in the committee as a whole, and it was decided, thanks to the chairman's tie-breaking vote, that it was necessary to create the required laws. The resolution was ultimately passed, with fifty-one votes in favor and forty-eight against.

That necessity to which a part of the majority in the house of representatives had reluctantly yielded, operated on no other subject; nor did it affect the strength of parties. Their opinion respecting that system of policy which ought to be observed in their external relations, remained the same; and their partialities and prejudices for and against foreign nations, sustained no diminution.

That need that some members of the House of Representatives had reluctantly accepted didn't impact anything else; it didn't change the strength of the parties either. Their views on the foreign policy that should be followed stayed the same, and their biases for and against other countries didn't lessen at all.

With regard to internal affairs also, the same spirit was retained.

With respect to internal matters as well, the same attitude was maintained.

So excessive had been the jealousy entertained by the opposition against a military force of any kind, that, even under the pressure of the Algerine war, the bill providing a naval armament could not be carried through the house without the insertion of a section suspending all proceedings under the act, should that war be terminated. The event which was to arrest the executive in the prosecution of this work having occurred, not a single frigate could be completed, without further authority from the legislature. This circumstance was the more important, as a peace had not been concluded with Tunis, or Tripoli; and, of consequence, the Mediterranean could not yet be safely navigated by the vessels of the United States. The President called the attention of congress to this subject; and stated the loss which would accrue from the sudden interruption of the work, and dispersion of the workmen. A bill to enable him to complete three, instead of six frigates, was with difficulty carried through the house.

The jealousy towards any military force had become so extreme that, even during the Algerine war, the bill for a naval armament couldn't get through the house without adding a clause to halt all actions under the act if that war ended. Once the situation that was meant to stop the executive from pursuing this project occurred, not a single frigate could be completed without additional approval from the legislature. This was particularly significant since peace had not been established with Tunis or Tripoli, meaning that the Mediterranean was still unsafe for U.S. vessels. The President brought this issue to Congress's attention and pointed out the losses that would result from abruptly stopping the work and scattering the workers. A bill to allow him to finish three frigates instead of six barely passed through the house.

But, except the treaty with Great Britain, no subject was brought forward in which parties felt a deeper interest, than on those questions which related to the revenue.

But aside from the treaty with Great Britain, no topic stirred up more interest among the parties than the issues related to revenue.

Notwithstanding the increasing productiveness of the duties on external commerce, this resource had not yet become entirely adequate to the exigencies of the nation. To secure the complete execution of the system for gradually redeeming the public debt, without disregarding those casualties to which all nations are exposed, it was believed that some additional aids to the treasury would be required. Upon the nature of these aids, much contrariety of opinion prevailed. The friends of the administration were in favour of extending the system of indirect internal taxation: but, constituting the minority in one branch of the legislature, they could carry no proposition on which the opposition was united; and the party which had become the majority in the house of representatives, had been generally hostile to that mode of obtaining revenue. From an opinion that direct taxes were recommended by intrinsic advantages, or that the people would become more attentive to the charges against the administration, should their money be drawn from them by visible means, those who wished power to change hands, had generally manifested a disposition to oblige those who exercised it, to resort to a system of revenue, by which a great degree of sensibility will always be excited. The indirect taxes proposed in the committee of ways and means were strongly resisted; and only that which proposed an augmentation of the duty on carriages for pleasure was passed into a law.

Despite the growing revenue from external trade duties, this source wasn't enough to fully meet the nation's needs. To ensure the complete implementation of the plan to gradually pay off the public debt, while not ignoring the risks all nations face, it was thought that some extra support for the treasury would be necessary. There was a lot of disagreement about what these extra supports should be. Supporters of the administration wanted to expand the system of indirect internal taxes; however, since they were the minority in one part of the legislature, they couldn't push through any proposals opposed by the majority. The party that had gained a majority in the House of Representatives had generally been against that way of raising revenue. Believing that direct taxes had inherent benefits or that people would pay more attention to government spending if they could clearly see their money being taken, those who wanted to shift power tended to push for a revenue system that would always stir a strong public response. The indirect taxes suggested by the committee on ways and means faced significant opposition, and only the proposal to increase the duty on pleasure carriages was passed into law.

Congress adjourns.

On the first day of June, this long and interesting session was terminated. No preceding legislature had been engaged in discussions by which their own passions, or those of their constituents were more strongly excited; nor on subjects more vitally important to the United States.

On the first day of June, this lengthy and intriguing session came to an end. No previous legislature had been involved in discussions that stirred their own passions or those of their constituents more intensely, nor had they tackled issues more crucial to the United States.

From this view of the angry contests of party, it may not be unacceptable to turn aside for a moment, and to look back to a transaction in which the movements of a feeling heart discover themselves, not the less visibly, for being engaged in a struggle with the stern duties of a public station.

From this perspective on the heated battles between parties, it might be worthwhile to take a moment to reflect on an event where the dynamics of an emotional heart are revealed, even if it's still part of the struggle with the serious responsibilities of a public role.

The president endeavors to procure the liberation of Lafayette.

No one of those foreigners who, during the war of the revolution, had engaged in the service of the United States, had embraced their cause with so much enthusiasm, or had held so distinguished a place in the affections of General Washington, as the Marquis de Lafayette. The attachment of these illustrious personages to each other had been openly expressed, and had yielded neither to time, nor to the remarkable vicissitude of fortune with which the destinies of one of them had been chequered. For his friend, while guiding the course of a revolution which fixed the anxious attention of the world, or while a prisoner in Prussia, or in the dungeon of Olmutz, the President manifested the same esteem, and felt the same solicitude. The extreme jealousy, however, with which the persons who administered the government of France, as well as a large party in America, watched his deportment towards all those whom the ferocious despotism of the Jacobins had exiled from their country, imposed upon him the painful necessity of observing great circumspection in his official conduct, on this delicate subject. A formal interposition in favour of the virtuous and unfortunate victim of their furious passions, would have been unavailing. Without benefiting the person whom it would be designed to aid, it might produce serious political mischief. But the American ministers employed at foreign courts were instructed to seize every fair occasion to express, unofficially, the interest taken by the President in the fate of Lafayette; and to employ the most eligible means in their power to obtain his liberty, or to meliorate his situation. A confidential person[42] had been sent to Berlin to solicit his discharge: but before this messenger had reached his destination, the King of Prussia had delivered over his illustrious prisoner to the Emperor of Germany. Mr. Pinckney had been instructed not only to indicate the wishes of the President to the Austrian minister at London, but to endeavour, unofficially, to obtain the powerful mediation of Britain; and had at one time flattered himself that the cabinet of St. James would take an interest in the case; but this hope was soon dissipated.

No one among the foreigners who, during the Revolutionary War, joined the service of the United States showed as much passion for their cause or held as special a place in the heart of General Washington as the Marquis de Lafayette. Their strong friendship was clearly shown and neither time nor the dramatic turns of fate that affected one of them diminished it. Whether his friend was leading a revolution that captured the world's attention or was imprisoned in Prussia or locked away in the dungeon of Olmutz, the President consistently expressed the same respect and concern. However, the intense jealousy of those in the French government, as well as a significant faction in America, regarding his treatment of those whom the ruthless Jacobin regime had exiled, forced him to be cautious in his official actions regarding this sensitive issue. A direct intervention on behalf of the noble and unfortunate victim of their rage would have been futile. It would not have helped the person it aimed to assist and could have caused serious political problems. Still, the American ministers at foreign courts were directed to take every available opportunity to unofficially show the President's concern for Lafayette's fate and to use any means they could to win his freedom or improve his situation. A trusted individual[42] was sent to Berlin to request his release: but before this messenger arrived, the King of Prussia handed his distinguished prisoner over to the Emperor of Germany. Mr. Pinckney was instructed not only to convey the President's wishes to the Austrian minister in London but also to unofficially seek the strong support of Britain; at one point, he was hopeful that the St. James's cabinet would take an interest in the matter, but that hope quickly faded.

After being disappointed in obtaining the mediation of the British cabinet, the President addressed the following letter to the Emperor of Germany.

After being disappointed in getting the help of the British government, the President sent the following letter to the Emperor of Germany.

"It will readily occur to your majesty that occasions may sometimes exist, on which official considerations would constrain the chief of a nation to be silent and passive in relation even to objects which affect his sensibility and claim his interposition as a man. Finding myself precisely in this situation at present, I take the liberty of writing this private letter to your majesty, being persuaded that my motives will also be my apology for it.

"It will be clear to your majesty that there may be times when official matters require a nation's leader to remain silent and inactive, even regarding issues that touch on their feelings and call for action as a person. I find myself in exactly this situation now, so I’m writing this private letter to your majesty, believing that my reasons will serve as my justification for doing so."

"In common with the people of this country, I retain a strong and cordial sense of the services rendered to them by the Marquis de Lafayette; and my friendship for him has been constant and sincere. It is natural, therefore, that I should sympathize with him and his family in their misfortunes, and endeavour to mitigate the calamities they experience, among which his present confinement is not the least distressing.

"In line with the people of this country, I have a deep appreciation for the services provided by the Marquis de Lafayette; and my friendship for him has been steady and genuine. It's only natural that I empathize with him and his family during their tough times and try to alleviate the hardships they're facing, including his current imprisonment, which is particularly distressing."

"I forbear to enlarge on this delicate subject. Permit me only to submit to your majesty's consideration, whether his long imprisonment, and the confiscation of his estate, and the indigence and dispersion of his family, and the painful anxieties incident to all these circumstances, do not form an assemblage of sufferings which recommend him to the mediation of humanity? allow me, sir, on this occasion, to be its organ; and to entreat that he may be permitted to come to this country, on such conditions, and under such restrictions, as your majesty may think it expedient to prescribe.

"I’ll hold back from going into detail about this sensitive issue. I just want to ask for your majesty's consideration: doesn't his long imprisonment, the seizure of his property, the poverty and scattering of his family, and the painful worries that come with all these situations create a significant amount of suffering that calls for compassion? Allow me, sir, to speak on behalf of that compassion; I urge that he be allowed to come to this country, under whatever conditions and restrictions your majesty deems appropriate."

"As it is a maxim with me not to ask what, under similar circumstances, I would not grant, your majesty will do me the justice to believe that this request appears to me to correspond with those great principles of magnanimity and wisdom, which form the basis of sound policy, and durable glory."

"As my guiding principle is not to ask for something that I wouldn’t be willing to give in the same situation, I hope you will understand, your majesty, that this request aligns with the important values of generosity and wisdom that are the foundation of effective leadership and lasting honor."

This letter was transmitted to Mr. Pinckney to be conveyed to the Emperor through his minister at London. How far it operated in mitigating immediately the rigour of Lafayette's confinement, or in obtaining his liberation, remains unascertained.

This letter was sent to Mr. Pinckney to be delivered to the Emperor through his minister in London. It's unclear how much it helped to ease Lafayette's harsh confinement or to secure his release.


CHAPTER IV.

Letter from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile measures of France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe recalled and General Pinckney appointed to succeed him.... General Washington's valedictory address to the people of the United States.... The Minister of France endeavours to influence the approaching election.... The President's speech to Congress.... He denies the authenticity of certain spurious letters published in 1776.... John Adams elected President, and Thomas Jefferson Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... Political situation of the United States at this period.... The French government refuses to receive General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... President's speech.... Three envoys extraordinary deputed to France.... Their treatment.... Measures of hostility adopted by the American government against France.... General Washington appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And character.

Letter from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.... Hostile actions by France against the United States.... Mr. Monroe is recalled and General Pinckney is appointed to take his place.... General Washington's farewell address to the people of the United States.... The Minister of France tries to sway the upcoming election.... The President's speech to Congress.... He denies the validity of certain fake letters published in 1776.... John Adams is elected President, and Thomas Jefferson is Vice President.... General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.... The political situation of the United States at this time.... The French government refuses to accept General Pinckney as Minister.... Congress is convened.... President's speech.... Three special envoys are sent to France.... Their treatment.... Hostile measures taken by the American government against France.... General Washington is appointed Commander-in-chief of the American army.... His death.... And character.

 

1796

The confidential friends of the President had long known his fixed purpose to retire from office at the end of his second term, and the people generally suspected it. Those who dreaded a change of system, in changing the person, of the chief magistrate, manifested an earnest desire to avoid this hazard, by being permitted once more to offer to the public choice a person who, amidst all the fierce conflicts of party, still remained the object of public veneration. But his resolution was to be shaken only by the obvious approach of a perilous crisis, which, endangering the safety of the nation, would make it unworthy of his character, and incompatible with his principles, to retreat from its service. In the apprehension that the co-operation of external with internal causes might bring about such a crisis, he had yielded to the representations of those who urged him to leave himself master of his conduct, by withholding a public declaration of his intention, until the propriety of affording a reasonable time to fix on a successor should require its disclosure. "If," said Colonel Hamilton in a letter on this subject of the fifth of July, "a storm gathers, how can you retreat? this is a most serious question."

The President's close friends had long been aware of his firm intention to step down at the end of his second term, and most people suspected it as well. Those who feared a change in the system that would come with a new chief magistrate showed a strong desire to avoid this risk by wanting to present to the public a candidate who, despite all the intense party conflicts, still remained respected by the public. However, his decision would only be swayed by the clear arrival of a serious crisis that threatened the nation's safety, making it inconsistent with his character and principles to withdraw from serving. Fearing that a combination of external and internal factors could lead to such a crisis, he agreed to the advice of those who urged him to keep control over his actions by not making a public declaration of his intentions until it was time to find a successor. "If," Colonel Hamilton wrote in a letter on July 5th, "a storm gathers, how can you retreat? this is a very serious question."

The suspense produced in the public opinion by this silence on the part of the chief magistrate, seemed to redouble the efforts of those who laboured to rob him of the affection of the people, and to attach odium to the political system which he had pursued. As passion alone is able successfully to contend with passion, they still sought, in the hate which America bore to Britain, and in her love to France, for the most powerful means with which to eradicate her love to Washington. Amongst the various artifices employed to effect this object, was the publication of those queries which had been propounded by the President to his cabinet council, previous to the arrival of Mr. Genet. This publication was intended to demonstrate the existence of a disposition in the chief magistrate unfriendly to the French republic, of "a Machiavellian policy, which nothing but the universal sentiment of enthusiastic affection displayed by the people of the United States, on the arrival of Mr. Genet, could have subdued." Some idea of the intemperance of the day may be formed from the conclusion of that number of a series of virulent essays, in which these queries were inserted, and from recollecting that it was addressed to a man who, more than any other, had given character as well as independence to his country; and whose life, devoted to her service, had exhibited one pure undeviating course of virtuous exertion to promote her interests.

The suspense created in public opinion by the silence of the president seemed to intensify the efforts of those trying to undermine his connection with the people and to discredit the political system he had followed. Since only passion can effectively challenge passion, they continued to leverage the hatred America felt toward Britain and the affection for France to weaken the public's love for Washington. Among the various tactics used to achieve this goal was the release of questions that the President had posed to his cabinet before Mr. Genet's arrival. This release aimed to suggest that the chief magistrate had an unfriendly disposition toward the French republic and followed a "Machiavellian" policy, which was only countered by the overwhelming sentiment of enthusiastic affection shown by the people of the United States upon Mr. Genet’s arrival. To understand the intensity of the time, one can look at the conclusion of that number of a series of harsh essays that included these questions, remembering that it was directed at a man who, more than anyone else, had given both character and independence to his country, whose life dedicated to public service had displayed a consistently virtuous commitment to promoting her interests.

It is in these words: "The foregoing queries were transmitted for consideration to the heads of departments, previously to a meeting to be held at the President's house. The text needs no commentary. It has stamped upon its front in characters brazen enough for idolatry to comprehend, perfidy and ingratitude. To doubt in such a case was dishonourable, to proclaim those doubts treachery. For the honour of the American character and of human nature, it is to be lamented that the records of the United States exhibit such a stupendous monument of degeneracy. It will almost require the authenticity of holy writ to persuade posterity that it is not a libel ingeniously contrived to injure the reputation of the saviour of his country."

It is in these words: "The previous questions were sent to the department heads for review before a meeting at the President's house. The message speaks for itself. It clearly shows, in bold terms understandable even to those who worship idols, betrayal and ungratefulness. To question this situation was dishonorable, and to voice those doubts was an act of treachery. For the sake of the American character and human nature, it's a shame that the records of the United States display such an enormous symbol of decline. It will almost take the credibility of sacred texts to convince future generations that this is not a cleverly crafted slander aimed at tarnishing the reputation of the country's savior."

As this state paper was perfectly confidential, and had been communicated only to the cabinet ministers, Mr. Jefferson thought proper to free himself from any possible suspicion of having given it publicity, by assuring the President that this breach of confidence must be ascribed to some other person.

As this official document was completely confidential and had only been shared with the cabinet ministers, Mr. Jefferson felt it was necessary to clear himself of any potential suspicion of leaking it by assuring the President that this breach of trust must be attributed to someone else.

Letter from General Washington to Mr. Jefferson.

In answer to this letter the President said—

In response to this letter, the President said—

"If I had entertained any suspicion before, that the queries which have been published in Bache's paper proceeded from you, the assurances you have given of the contrary would have removed them:—but the truth is, I harboured none. I am at no loss to conjecture from what source they flowed, through what channel they were conveyed, nor for what purpose they and similar publications appear.

"If I had any doubt before that the questions published in Bache's paper came from you, your assurances to the contrary would have cleared it up; but the truth is, I didn’t have any doubts. I can easily guess where they came from, how they were sent, and why they and similar publications exist."

"As you have mentioned[43] the subject yourself, it would not be frank, candid, or friendly to conceal, that your conduct has been represented as derogating from that opinion I conceived you entertained of me; that to your particular friends and connexions you have described, and they have denounced me, as a person under a dangerous influence, and that, if I would listen more to some other opinions, all would be well. My answer invariably has been, that I had never discovered any thing in the conduct of Mr. Jefferson to raise suspicions in my mind of his sincerity; that if he would retrace my public conduct while he was in the administration, abundant proofs would occur to him, that truth and right decisions were the sole objects of my pursuit; that there were as many instances within his own knowledge of my having decided against as in favour of the person evidently alluded to; and moreover, that I was no believer in the infallibility of the politics or measures of any man living. In short, that I was no party man myself, and that the first wish of my heart was, if parties did exist, to reconcile them.

"As you noted[43], it wouldn’t be honest, straightforward, or friendly to hide the fact that your actions have been seen as undermining the opinion I believed you had of me. You've explained to your close friends and connections, and they have condemned me as someone under a harmful influence, claiming that if I would listen more to other opinions, everything would be fine. My consistent response has been that I’ve never seen anything in Mr. Jefferson’s actions to make me doubt his sincerity. If he would review my public actions while he was in office, he would find plenty of evidence that truth and proper decisions were my only goals. There were just as many examples within his own knowledge of me having decided against as in favor of the person clearly referred to; and furthermore, I don’t believe in the infallibility of anyone’s politics or actions. In short, I’m not a party person myself, and my greatest wish is, if parties do exist, to bring them together."

"To this I may add, and very truly, that until the last year or two, I had no conception that parties would, or even could go the lengths I have been witness to; nor did I believe, until lately, that it was within the bounds of probability—hardly within those of possibility—that while I was using my utmost exertions to establish a national character of our own, independent as far as our obligations and justice would permit, of every nation of the earth; and wished by steering a steady course to preserve this country from the horrors of a desolating war, I should be accused of being the enemy of one nation and subject to the influence of another; and to prove it, that every act of my administration would be tortured, and the grossest and most insidious misrepresentations of them be made, by giving one side only of a subject, and that too in such exaggerated and indecent terms as could scarcely be applied to a Nero—to a notorious defaulter—or even to a common pick-pocket.

"To this I can honestly add that until the last year or two, I had no idea that political parties would, or even could, go to the extremes I've witnessed; nor did I believe, until recently, that it was even probable—hardly possible—that while I was doing my best to establish a national identity that was independent, as much as our obligations and fairness allowed, from every nation in the world, and aiming to steer a steady course to keep this country safe from the horrors of a devastating war, I would be accused of being an enemy to one nation and under the influence of another. To prove this, every action of my administration would be twisted, and the most outrageous and deceitful distortions of them would be made, presenting only one side of a situation and doing so in such exaggerated and inappropriate terms that they could hardly apply to a Nero—an infamous defaulter—or even to an ordinary pickpocket."

"But enough of this—I have already gone further in the expression of my feelings than I intended."

"But enough of this—I’ve already shared more of my feelings than I meant to."

Of the numerous misrepresentations and fabrications which, with unwearied industry, were pressed upon the public in order to withdraw the confidence of the nation from its chief, no one marked more strongly the depravity of that principle which justifies the means by the end, than the republication of certain forged letters, purporting to have been written by General Washington in the year 1776.

Of the many lies and distortions that were tirelessly pushed onto the public to undermine the nation's trust in its leader, nothing highlighted the moral corruption of the idea that the ends justify the means more than the re-release of certain fake letters, supposedly written by General Washington in 1776.

These letters had been originally published in the year 1777, and in them were interspersed, with domestic occurrences which might give them the semblance of verity, certain political sentiments favourable to Britain in the then existing contest.

These letters were first published in 1777, and they included some personal events that made them seem more real, along with political views that supported Britain in the ongoing conflict.

But the original fabricator of these papers missed his aim. It was necessary to assign the manner in which the possession of them was acquired; and in executing this part of his task, circumstances were stated so notoriously untrue, that, at the time, the meditated imposition deceived no person.

But the original creator of these documents missed the mark. It was essential to explain how they were obtained; and in doing this part of his job, he stated circumstances that were so clearly false that, at the time, his planned deception fooled no one.

In the indefatigable research for testimony which might countenance the charge that the executive was unfriendly to France, and under the influence of Britain, these letters were drawn from the oblivion into which they had sunk, it had been supposed forever, and were republished as genuine. The silence with which the President treated this as well as every other calumny, was construed into an acknowledgment of its truth; and the malignant commentators on this spurious text, would not admit the possibility of its being apocryphal.

In the relentless search for evidence that could support the claim that the executive was hostile toward France and under the sway of Britain, these letters were pulled from the obscurity they had seemingly fallen into forever and were republished as authentic. The way the President ignored this and other slanders was interpreted as an admission of their truth; and the spiteful critics of this fake text refused to consider the possibility that it might be false.

Those who laboured incessantly to establish the favourite position that the executive was under other than French influence, reviewed every act of the administration connected with its foreign relations, and continued to censure every part of the system with extreme bitterness. Not only the treaty with Great Britain, but all those measures which had been enjoined by the duties of neutrality, were reprobated as justly offensive to France; and no opinion which had been advanced by Mr. Genet, in his construction of the treaties between the two nations, was too extravagant to be approved. The ardent patriot can not maintain the choicest rights of his country with more zeal than was manifested in supporting all the claims of the French republic upon the United States. These discussions were not confined to the public prints. In almost every assemblage of individuals, whether for social or other purposes, this favourite theme excluded all others; and the pretensions of France were supported and controverted with equal earnestness. The opposing parties, mutually exasperated by unceasing altercations, cherished reciprocal suspicions of each other, and each charged its adversary with being under a foreign influence.[44] Those who favoured the measures adopted by America were accused as the enemies of liberty, the enemies of France, and the tools of Britain. In turn, they charged their opponents with disseminating principles subversive of all order in society; and with supporting a foreign government against their own.

Those who worked tirelessly to assert that the executive branch was not influenced by France scrutinized every action of the administration related to foreign affairs, harshly criticizing every part of the system with intense bitterness. Not just the treaty with Great Britain, but all the measures required by neutrality were condemned as rightly offensive to France; and any opinion put forth by Mr. Genet regarding the treaties between the two nations was considered acceptable, no matter how extreme. The passionate patriot cannot defend the essential rights of their country with more fervor than what was shown in backing all the claims of the French republic against the United States. These debates weren’t limited to newspapers. In nearly every gathering of people, whether social or otherwise, this popular topic overshadowed all others; and the demands of France were argued for and against with equal passion. The opposing sides, constantly irritated by relentless arguments, harbored mutual suspicions of each other, with each side accusing the other of being under foreign influence. [44] Those who supported America's measures were labeled as enemies of liberty, enemies of France, and pawns of Britain. In response, they accused their rivals of spreading ideas that undermined societal order and of siding with a foreign government against their own.

Whatever might be the real opinion of the French government on the validity of its charges against the United States, those charges were too vehemently urged, and too powerfully espoused in America, to be abandoned at Paris. If at any time they were in part relinquished, they were soon resumed.

Whatever the true views of the French government on the validity of its accusations against the United States, those accusations were pushed too forcefully and supported too strongly in America to be dropped in Paris. If they were ever partially set aside, they were quickly brought back.

For a time, Mr. Fauchet forbore to press the points on which his predecessor had insisted; but his complaints of particular cases which grew out of the war, and out of the rules which had been established by the executive were unremitting. The respectful language in which these complaints were at first urged, soon yielded to the style of reproach; and in his correspondence with the secretary of state, towards its close, he adopted the sentiments, without absolutely discarding the manner of Mr. Genet.

For a while, Mr. Fauchet held back from pushing the issues his predecessor had emphasized; however, his complaints about specific cases resulting from the war and the rules set by the executive were constant. The respectful tone he initially used for these complaints eventually turned into one of reproach. By the end of his correspondence with the secretary of state, he adopted similar sentiments, though he didn't completely abandon the style of Mr. Genet.

Mr. Adet, the successor of Mr. Fauchet, arrived at Philadelphia, while the senate was deliberating on the treaty of amity with Great Britain.

Mr. Adet, the successor of Mr. Fauchet, arrived in Philadelphia while the Senate was discussing the treaty of friendship with Great Britain.

In the observations he made on that instrument, when submitted to his consideration by order of the President, he complained particularly of the abandonment of the principle that free ships should make free goods; and urged the injustice, while French cruisers were restrained by treaty from taking English goods out of American bottoms, that English cruisers should be liberated from the same restraint. No demonstration could be more complete than was the fallacy of this complaint. But the American government discovered a willingness voluntarily to release France from the pressure of a situation in which she had elected to place herself.

In his observations on that instrument, provided to him for review by the President, he specifically criticized the abandonment of the principle that free ships should mean free goods. He argued that it was unfair, while French cruisers were restricted by treaty from taking English goods from American ships, that English cruisers should not be held to the same restrictions. No demonstration could more clearly expose the fallacy of this complaint. However, the American government showed a willingness to voluntarily relieve France from the burden of a situation she had chosen to create.

Hostile measures of France against the United States.

In the anxiety which was felt by the President to come to full and immediate explanations on this treaty, the American minister at Paris had been furnished, even before its ratification, and still more fully afterwards, with ample materials for the justification of his government. But, misconceiving[45] the views of the administration, he reserved these representations to answer complaints which were expected, and omitted to make them in the first instance, while the course to be pursued by the Directory was under deliberation. Meanwhile, his letters kept up the alarm which had been excited with regard to the dispositions of France; and intelligence from the West Indies served to confirm it. Through a private channel, the President received information that the special agents of the Directory in the islands were about to issue orders for the capture of all American vessels, laden in the whole or in part with provisions, and bound for any port within the dominions of the British crown.

In the anxiety felt by the President to get full and immediate explanations on this treaty, the American minister in Paris had been provided, even before its ratification, and even more so afterwards, with plenty of information to justify his government’s actions. However, misinterpreting the administration’s views, he held back these explanations to respond to expected complaints and failed to present them initially, while the Directory was still deciding on their course of action. In the meantime, his letters heightened the concerns about France's intentions, and information from the West Indies confirmed those fears. Through a private channel, the President learned that the special agents of the Directory in the islands were about to give orders to capture all American vessels, whether fully or partially loaded with provisions, destined for any port within the British crown's territories.

Mr. Monroe recalled and General Pinckney appointed to succeed him.

Knowing well that the intentions of the executive towards the French republic had been at all times friendly, and entertaining a strong conviction that its conduct was liable to no just objection, the President had relied with confidence on early and candid communications, for the removal of any prejudices or misconceptions, which the passions of the moment might have occasioned. That the French government would be disappointed at the adjustment of those differences which had threatened to embroil the United States with Great Britain, could not be doubted; but as neither this adjustment, nor the arrangements connected with it, had furnished any real cause of complaint, he cherished the hope that it would produce no serious consequences, if the proper means of prevention should be applied in time. He was therefore dissatisfied with delays which he had not expected; and seems to have believed that they originated in a want of zeal to justify a measure, which neither the minister himself nor his political friends had ever approved. To insure an earnest and active representation of the true sentiments and views of the administration, the President was inclined to depute an envoy extraordinary for the particular purpose, who should be united with the actual minister; but an objection drawn from the constitution was suggested to this measure. During the recess of the senate, the President can only fill up vacancies; and the appointment of a minister when no vacancy existed, might be supposed to transcend his powers. From respect to this construction of the constitution, the resolution was taken to appoint a successor to Colonel Monroe. The choice of a person in all respects qualified for this mission was not without its difficulty. While a disposition friendly to the administration was a requisite not to be dispensed with, it was also desirable that the person employed should have given no umbrage to the French government. No individual who had performed a conspicuous part on the political theatre of America, fitted both branches of this description. All who had openly sustained with zeal and with talents, the measures of the American government, had been marked as the enemies of France, and were on this account to be avoided.

Knowing that the executive's intentions toward the French republic had always been friendly, and believing strongly that its actions were above reproach, the President confidently relied on open and honest communication to clear up any prejudices or misunderstandings that the emotions of the moment might have created. It was clear that the French government would be disappointed with the resolution of the issues that had nearly drawn the United States into conflict with Great Britain; however, since neither this resolution nor the related arrangements provided any real grounds for complaint, he hoped that it would not lead to any serious consequences if the right preventive measures were taken in time. Therefore, he was unhappy with delays he hadn’t anticipated and seemed to think they stemmed from a lack of effort to justify a move that neither the minister nor his political allies had ever supported. To ensure an enthusiastic and active representation of the administration's true sentiments and goals, the President considered sending an extraordinary envoy for this specific purpose, working alongside the current minister; however, a constitutional objection was raised against this plan. During the Senate's recess, the President could only fill existing vacancies; appointing a minister when no vacancy existed could be seen as exceeding his powers. Out of respect for this interpretation of the Constitution, the decision was made to appoint a successor to Colonel Monroe. Choosing someone fully qualified for this mission was challenging. While a friendly disposition toward the administration was essential, it was also important that the person chosen had not offended the French government. No individual with a prominent role in American politics met both of these criteria. Those who had openly supported the American government's measures with enthusiasm and skill had been marked as enemies of France and were consequently to be avoided.

For this critical and important service, the President, after some deliberation, selected General Charles Cotesworth Pinckney, of South Carolina, an elder brother of Mr. Thomas Pinckney, the late[46] minister of the United States at London. No man in America was more perfectly free from exception than this gentleman. Having engaged with ardour in that war which gave independence to his country, he had, in its progress, sustained from the British army indignities to his person, and injuries to his fortune, which are not easily forgotten. In the early part of the French revolution, he had felt and expressed all the enthusiasm of his countrymen for the establishment of the republic; but, after the commencement of its contests with the United States, he stood aloof from both those political parties which had divided America. Restrained by the official situation of his brother during the negotiations which had been carried on with England, he had forborne to express any opinion respecting the treaty in which those negotiations terminated, and had consequently taken no part with those who approved, or with those who condemned that instrument. No man, therefore, who had not declared himself unfriendly to the principles he would be deputed to support, could be less objectionable to France.

For this essential and significant role, the President, after some thought, chose General Charles Cotesworth Pinckney from South Carolina, who was the older brother of Mr. Thomas Pinckney, the recent minister of the United States in London. No one in America was more universally respected than this man. He had passionately participated in the war that granted independence to his country, enduring personal insults and financial losses from the British army that were hard to forget. During the early part of the French Revolution, he shared and expressed the enthusiasm of his countrymen for establishing a republic; however, after the beginning of conflicts with the United States, he distanced himself from both political parties that were dividing America. Because of his brother's official position during the negotiations with England, he refrained from voicing any opinion on the treaty that resulted from those negotiations and thus did not align himself with either those who supported it or those who opposed it. As a result, no one who had not publicly shown hostility toward the principles he would be assigned to uphold could be less objectionable to France.

To the President he was recommended by an intimate knowledge of his worth; by a confidence in the sincerity of his personal attachment to the chief magistrate; by a conviction that his exertions to effect the objects of his mission would be ardent and sincere; and that, whatever might be his partialities for France, he possessed a high and delicate sense of national as well as individual honour, was jealous for the reputation of his country, and tenacious of its rights.

To the President, he was recommended because of a deep understanding of his value, a belief in the sincerity of his personal loyalty to the chief executive, and a strong conviction that he would work passionately and genuinely to achieve the goals of his mission. Even though he had a fondness for France, he had a strong and sensitive sense of both national and personal honor, cared deeply about his country's reputation, and was protective of its rights.

In July, immediately after the appointment of General Pinckney, letters were received from Colonel Monroe communicating the official complaints against the American government which had been made to him in March by Mr. de La Croix, the minister of exterior relations, together with his answer to those complaints.

In July, right after General Pinckney was appointed, letters came in from Colonel Monroe sharing the official complaints about the American government that Mr. de La Croix, the minister of exterior relations, had made to him in March, along with his response to those complaints.

In this answer the American minister had effectually refuted the criminations of Mr. de La Croix; and the executive was satisfied with it. But the Directory had decided on their system, and it was not by reasoning, however conclusive, that this decision was to be changed.

In this response, the American minister had effectively countered the accusations from Mr. de La Croix, and the executive was pleased with it. However, the Directory had made up its mind about their approach, and no matter how convincing the arguments were, this decision wouldn't be altered.

As the time for electing the chief magistrate approached, the anxiety of the public respecting the person in office, seemed to increase. In states where the electors are chosen by the people, names of great political influence were offered for their approbation. The strong hold which Washington had taken of the affections of his countrymen was, on this occasion, fully evinced. In districts where the opposition to his administration was most powerful, where all his measures were most loudly condemned, where those who approved his system possessed least influence, the men who appeared to control public opinion on every other subject, found themselves unable to move it on this. Even the most popular among the leaders of the opposition were reduced to the necessity of surrendering their pretensions to a place in the electoral body, or of pledging themselves to bestow their suffrage on the actual President. The determination of his fellow citizens had been unequivocally manifested, and it was believed to be apparent that the election would again be unanimous, when he announced his resolution to withdraw from the honours and the toils of office.

As the time to elect the president approached, the public's anxiety about the current officeholder seemed to grow. In states where the electors are chosen by the people, names of significant political figures were put forward for their approval. The strong bond Washington had formed with his fellow citizens was clearly demonstrated in this situation. In areas where opposition to his administration was strongest, where all his actions faced the loudest criticism, and where those who supported his policies had the least influence, the people who typically shaped public opinion on other issues found themselves unable to sway it in this case. Even the most popular leaders of the opposition had to either give up their aspirations to be part of the electoral body or commit to voting for the sitting president. The resolve of his fellow citizens had been clearly shown, and it was widely believed that the election would once again be unanimous when he announced his decision to step away from the honors and challenges of office.

Having long contemplated this event, and having wished to terminate his political course with an act which might be at the same time suitable to his own character, and permanently useful to his country, he had prepared for the occasion a valedictory address, in which, with the solicitude of a person, who, in bidding a final adieu to his friends, leaves his affections and his anxieties for their welfare behind him, he made a last effort to impress upon his countrymen those great political truths which had been the guides of his own administration, and could alone, in his opinion, form a sure and solid basis for the happiness, the independence, and the liberty of the United States.

Having thought about this moment for a long time and wanting to end his political career with an action that would reflect his character and benefit his country, he prepared a farewell address. With the care of someone who, in saying goodbye to friends, leaves behind his love and concern for their well-being, he made one last attempt to impress upon his fellow citizens the important political truths that had guided his administration and, in his view, could only provide a strong and reliable foundation for the happiness, independence, and freedom of the United States.

This interesting paper was published in September, at a time when hopes were entertained that the discontents of France might be appeased by proper representations. It contains precepts to which the American statesman can not too frequently recur, and though long, is thought too valuable to be omitted or abridged.

This engaging paper was published in September, when there were hopes that the unrest in France could be eased through appropriate discussions. It includes principles that American leaders should refer to often, and although it's lengthy, it's considered too important to be left out or shortened.

General Washington's valedictory address to the people of the United States in which he declines being considered as a candidate for the presidency.

TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.

TO THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES.

"Friends and fellow citizens,

"Friends and community members,

"The period for a new election of a citizen to administer the executive government of the United States being not far distant, and the time actually arrived when your thoughts must be employed in designating the person who is to be clothed with that important trust, it appears to me proper, especially as it may conduce to a more distinct expression of the public voice, that I should now apprize you of the resolution I have formed, to decline being considered among the number of those, out of whom a choice is to be made.

"The time for a new election of a citizen to lead the executive government of the United States is approaching, and it's now the moment to focus on choosing the person who will hold that important responsibility. I believe it's important, especially to clarify the public opinion, to inform you of my decision to step back from consideration for this role."

"I beg you, at the same time, to do me the justice to be assured, that this resolution has not been taken, without a strict regard to all the considerations appertaining to the relation which binds a dutiful citizen to his country; and that, in withdrawing the tender of service which silence in my situation might imply, I am influenced by no diminution of zeal for your future interest; no deficiency of grateful respect for your past kindness; but am supported by a full conviction that the step is compatible with both.

"I ask you, at the same time, to understand that this decision wasn't made without giving careful thought to the responsibilities that bind a loyal citizen to their country. By stepping back from the offer of service that my silence in this situation might suggest, I'm not expressing any lack of enthusiasm for your future, nor am I lacking in gratitude for your past kindness. Rather, I am fully convinced that this action is consistent with both."

"The acceptance of, and continuance hitherto in the office to which your suffrages have twice called me, have been a uniform sacrifice of inclination to the opinion of duty and to a deference for what appeared to be your desire. I constantly hoped that it would have been much earlier in my power, consistently with motives which I was not at liberty to disregard, to return to that retirement from which I had been reluctantly drawn. The strength of my inclination to do this, previous to the last election, had even led to the preparation of an address to declare it to you; but mature reflection on the then perplexed and critical posture of our affairs with foreign nations, and the unanimous advice of persons entitled to my confidence, impelled me to abandon the idea.

"The acceptance of, and continuation so far in the position you have twice elected me to, has been a constant sacrifice of my personal preferences to what I felt was my duty and a respect for what I believed to be your wishes. I always hoped that it would have been possible for me to return to the retirement I was reluctantly pulled from much earlier, in line with motives I couldn't ignore. Before the last election, my strong desire to do this even led me to prepare a message to inform you; however, after careful consideration of our complicated and delicate situation with other countries, and the unanimous advice from those I trust, I felt compelled to abandon that idea."

"I rejoice that the state of your concerns, external as well as internal, no longer renders the pursuit of inclination incompatible with the sentiment of duty or propriety; and am persuaded, whatever partiality may be retained for my services, that in the present circumstances of our country, you will not disapprove my determination to retire.

"I’m glad that your concerns, both outside and inside, no longer make it impossible to follow your desires while still feeling a sense of duty or doing what's right; and I believe, no matter how much you might still appreciate my work, that you will understand my choice to step back given the current situation in our country."

"The impressions with which I first undertook the arduous trust, were explained on the proper occasion. In the discharge of this trust, I will only say that I have, with good intentions, contributed towards the organization and administration of the government, the best exertions of which a very fallible judgment was capable. Not unconscious in the outset, of the inferiority of my qualifications, experience, in my own eyes, perhaps still more in the eyes of others, has strengthened the motives to diffidence of myself; and, every day, the increasing weight of years admonishes me more and more, that the shade of retirement is as necessary to me as it will be welcome. Satisfied that if any circumstances have given peculiar value to my services, they were temporary, I have the consolation to believe that, while choice and prudence invite me to quit the political scene, patriotism does not forbid it.

"The feelings I had when I first took on this challenging role were shared at the right time. In fulfilling this role, I can only say that I have, with good intentions, helped with the organization and management of the government to the best of my somewhat limited judgment. Aware from the beginning of my lack of qualifications, my experience has likely reinforced my self-doubt, perhaps even more so in the eyes of others. Each day, as I grow older, it reminds me more and more that stepping back is as necessary for me as it will be welcome. I am convinced that any unique value my services may have had was only temporary, and I find comfort in knowing that while both choice and caution encourage me to step away from politics, my sense of patriotism does not stand in my way."

"In looking forward to the moment which is to terminate the career of my political life, my feelings do not permit me to suspend the deep acknowledgment of that debt of gratitude which I owe to my beloved country, for the many honours it has conferred upon me; still more for the steadfast confidence with which it has supported me; and for the opportunities I have thence enjoyed of manifesting my inviolable attachment, by services faithful and persevering, though in usefulness unequal to my zeal. If benefits have resulted to our country from these services, let it always be remembered to your praise, and as an instructive example in our annals, that under circumstances in which the passions, agitated in every direction, were liable to mislead amidst appearances sometimes dubious, vicissitudes of fortune often discouraging—in situations in which not unfrequently, want of success has countenanced the spirit of criticism—the constancy of your support was the essential prop of the efforts, and a guarantee of the plans by which they were effected. Profoundly penetrated with this idea, I shall carry it with me to my grave, as a strong incitement to unceasing vows, that heaven may continue to you the choicest tokens of its beneficence—that your union and brotherly affection may be perpetual—that the free constitution, which is the work of your hands, may be sacredly maintained—that its administration in every department may be stamped with wisdom and virtue—that, in fine, the happiness of the people of these states, under the auspices of liberty, may be made complete by so careful a preservation, and so prudent a use of this blessing, as will acquire to them the glory of recommending it to the applause, the affection, and adoption of every nation which is yet a stranger to it.

As I look forward to the moment that will end my political career, I can't help but express my deep gratitude to my beloved country for the many honors it has given me; even more so for the unwavering confidence it has shown me; and for the opportunities I have had to demonstrate my unwavering commitment through my faithful and persistent service, even if its usefulness hasn’t matched my enthusiasm. If benefits have come to our country from these efforts, let it always be remembered as a point of pride and a valuable lesson in our history that during times when passions were running high and could easily mislead in the face of uncertain appearances, and when setbacks often discouraged us—in situations where a lack of success sometimes sparked criticism—your unwavering support was the essential foundation of our efforts and a seal of approval for the plans we carried out. Deeply moved by this idea, I will carry it with me to my grave, as a strong motivation for my continual prayers, that heaven may continue to bless you with its finest gifts—that your unity and brotherly love may endure—that the free constitution, which you created, may be held sacred—that its administration in every area may reflect wisdom and virtue—and that ultimately, the happiness of the people in these states, under the guidance of liberty, may be fully realized through careful preservation and wise use of this blessing, earning them the admiration, love, and acceptance of every nation that has yet to experience it.

"Here, perhaps, I ought to stop. But a solicitude for your welfare, which can not end but with my life, and the apprehension of danger, natural to that solicitude, urge me, on an occasion like the present, to offer to your solemn contemplation, and to recommend to your frequent review, some sentiments which are the result of much reflection, of no inconsiderable observation, and which appear to me all important to the permanency of your felicity as a people. These will be offered to you with the more freedom, as you can only see in them the disinterested warnings of a parting friend, who can possibly have no personal motive to bias his counsel. Nor can I forget, as an encouragement to it, your indulgent reception of my sentiments on a former and not dissimilar occasion.

"Here, I guess it’s time for me to stop. But my concern for your well-being, which will last until my death, and the fear of danger that comes with that concern, push me to share some thoughts for you to seriously consider and frequently revisit. These ideas are the result of a lot of reflection and careful observation, and they seem crucial for your happiness as a community. I’m more than willing to share them because you’ll see them as the sincere warnings of a departing friend, who has no personal agenda to influence my advice. I also remember how kindly you received my thoughts in the past during a similar situation."

"Interwoven as is the love of liberty with every ligament of your hearts, no recommendation of mine is necessary to fortify or confirm the attachment.

"Since the love of freedom is deeply connected to every part of your hearts, you don’t need any suggestion from me to strengthen or confirm that bond."

"The unity of government which constitutes you one people, is also now dear to you. It is justly so; for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence; the support of your tranquillity at home; your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize. But, as it is easy to foresee, that from different causes, and from different quarters, much pains will be taken, many artifices employed, to weaken in your minds the conviction of this truth; as this is the point in your political fortress against which the batteries of internal and external enemies will be most constantly and actively (though often covertly and insidiously) directed; it is of infinite moment, that you should properly estimate the immense value of your national union to your collective and individual happiness; that you should cherish a cordial, habitual, and immovable attachment to it; accustoming yourselves to think and speak of it as of the palladium of your political safety and prosperity; watching for its preservation with jealous anxiety; discountenancing whatever may suggest even a suspicion that it can, in any event, be abandoned; and indignantly frowning upon the first dawning of every attempt to alienate any portion of our country from the rest, or to enfeeble the sacred ties which now link together the various parts.

"The unity of government that makes you one people is also valuable to you now. And rightly so; it’s a key pillar in the foundation of your true independence, supporting your peace at home, your tranquility abroad, your safety, your prosperity, and that very freedom you treasure so much. However, it's easy to predict that for various reasons, there will be significant efforts from different sources to weaken your belief in this truth; this is the target in your political fortress that both internal and external enemies will consistently and actively (though often secretly and subtly) attack. It's crucial that you recognize the immense importance of your national unity for your collective and individual happiness; that you develop a sincere, consistent, and unwavering commitment to it; getting used to thinking and talking about it as if it’s essential to your political safety and prosperity; vigilantly guarding its preservation with great concern; rejecting anything that suggests even the possibility of leaving it behind; and firmly opposing any early sign of attempts to separate any part of our country from the rest or to weaken the sacred connections that currently join all the parts together."

"For this you have every inducement of sympathy and interest. Citizens by birth, or choice, of a common country, that country has a right to concentrate your affections. The name of American, which belongs to you in your national capacity, must always exalt the just pride of patriotism, more than any appellation derived from local discriminations. With slight shades of difference, you have the same religion, manners, habits, and political principles.—You have, in a common cause, fought and triumphed together; the independence and liberty you possess, are the work of joint counsels, and joint efforts, of common dangers, sufferings, and successes.

"For this, you have every reason to feel sympathy and interest. As citizens, either by birth or choice, of a shared nation, that nation deserves to be the focus of your affections. The title of American, which you hold in your national identity, should always elevate your rightful pride in patriotism more than any name tied to local distinctions. With only slight differences, you share the same religion, customs, habits, and political beliefs. You have fought and succeeded together for a common cause; the independence and freedom you enjoy are the results of your joint decisions and efforts, as well as shared dangers, struggles, and victories."

"But these considerations, however powerfully they address themselves to your sensibility, are greatly outweighed by those which apply more immediately to your interest.—Here, every portion of our country finds the most commanding motives for carefully guarding and preserving the union of the whole.

"But these considerations, no matter how compelling they are for your feelings, are far outmatched by those that relate more directly to your interests. Here, every part of our country has strong reasons to carefully protect and maintain the unity of the entire nation."

"The north in an unrestrained intercourse with the south, protected by the equal laws of a common government, finds in the productions of the latter, great additional resources of maritime and commercial enterprise, and precious materials of manufacturing industry.—The south, in the same intercourse, benefiting by the same agency of the north, sees its agriculture grow, and its commerce expand. Turning partly into its own channels the seamen of the north, it finds its particular navigation invigorated; and while it contributes, in different ways, to nourish and increase the general mass of the national navigation, it looks forward to the protection of a maritime strength, to which itself is unequally adapted. The east, in a like intercourse with the west, already finds, and in the progressive improvement of interior communications by land and water, will more and more find a valuable vent for the commodities which it brings from abroad, or manufactures at home. The west derives from the east supplies requisite to its growth and comfort—and what is perhaps of still greater consequence, it must of necessity owe the secure enjoyment of indispensable outlets for its own productions, to the weight, influence, and the future maritime strength of the Atlantic side of the union, directed by an indissoluble community of interest as one nation. Any other tenure by which the west can hold this essential advantage, whether derived from its own separate strength, or from an apostate and unnatural connexion with any foreign power, must be intrinsically precarious.

The north, in open cooperation with the south, supported by equal laws of a shared government, discovers in the resources of the latter great opportunities for maritime and commercial ventures, as well as valuable materials for manufacturing. The south, benefiting from this partnership with the north, sees its agriculture flourish and its trade grow. By drawing some of the north’s sailors into its own activities, it boosts its own navigation; and while it contributes in various ways to enhance the overall national navigation, it looks forward to the protection of a maritime power for which it is not fully equipped. The east, in a similar partnership with the west, already finds, and as improvements in transportation and communication progress, will increasingly discover valuable outlets for the goods it imports or produces locally. The west relies on the east for the resources it needs to grow and thrive—and perhaps even more importantly, it must depend on the secure access to necessary markets for its products, thanks to the influence, importance, and future maritime strength of the Atlantic side of the union, driven by a strong shared interest as one nation. Any other way the west could maintain this crucial advantage, whether through its own independent power or through a rebellious and unnatural alliance with any foreign entity, would be inherently unstable.

"While then every part of our country thus feels an immediate and particular interest in union, all the parts combined can not fail to find in the united mass of means and efforts, greater strength, greater resource, proportionably greater security from external danger, a less frequent interruption of their peace by foreign nations; and, what is of inestimable value, they must derive from union an exemption from those broils and wars between themselves, which so frequently afflict neighbouring countries not tied together by the same government; which their own rivalships alone would be sufficient to produce, but which, opposite foreign alliances, attachments, and intrigues, would stimulate and embitter.—Hence likewise, they will avoid the necessity of those overgrown military establishments, which under any form of government are inauspicious to liberty, and which are to be regarded as particularly hostile to republican liberty. In this sense it is, that your union ought to be considered as a main prop of your liberty, and that the love of the one ought to endear to you the preservation of the other.

"While every part of our country feels a direct and specific interest in unity, when all parts come together, they cannot help but find greater strength, more resources, and proportionally increased security from external threats. This unity leads to fewer interruptions of their peace caused by foreign nations, and, most importantly, it helps them avoid the conflicts and wars among themselves that frequently trouble neighboring countries not unified under the same government. Such rivalries alone could lead to conflict, but opposing foreign alliances and intrigues would only exacerbate tensions. Additionally, they will steer clear of the need for large military forces, which, regardless of the type of government, are detrimental to freedom and particularly threatening to republican liberty. In this light, your unity should be seen as a key support for your freedom, and your affection for one should inspire you to protect the other."

"These considerations speak a persuasive language to every reflecting and virtuous mind, and exhibit the continuance of the union as a primary object of patriotic desire. Is there a doubt whether a common government can embrace so large a sphere? Let experience solve it. To listen to mere speculation in such a case were criminal. We are authorized to hope that a proper organization of the whole, with the auxiliary agency of governments for the respective subdivisions, will afford a happy issue to the experiment. It is well worth a fair and full experiment. With such powerful and obvious motives to union, affecting all parts of our country, while experience shall not have demonstrated its impracticability, there will always be reason to distrust the patriotism of those, who, in any quarter, may endeavour to weaken its bands.

"These thoughts speak to every thoughtful and virtuous person and highlight the importance of keeping the union as a main goal of patriotic desire. Is there any doubt that a common government can cover such a large area? Let experience answer that question. It's irresponsible to rely on mere speculation in this situation. We can reasonably expect that a proper organization of everything, along with support from local governments, will lead to a successful outcome for this experiment. It’s definitely worth a thorough and honest attempt. With such strong and clear reasons for unity that affect all parts of our country, as long as experience doesn't prove it impossible, we will always have cause to question the patriotism of those who, from any side, try to weaken its ties."

"In contemplating the causes which may disturb our union, it occurs as matter of serious concern, that any ground should have been furnished for characterizing parties by geographical discriminations,—northern and southernAtlantic and western; whence designing men may endeavour to excite a belief that there is a real difference of local interests and views. One of the expedients of party to acquire influence within particular districts, is to misrepresent the opinions and aims of other districts. You can not shield yourselves too much against the jealousies and heart burnings which spring from these misrepresentations: they tend to render alien to each other those who ought to be bound together by fraternal affection. The inhabitants of our western country have lately had a useful lesson on this head: they have seen, in the negotiation by the executive, and in the unanimous ratification by the senate of the treaty with Spain, and in the universal satisfaction at the event throughout the United States, a decisive proof how unfounded were the suspicions propagated among them of a policy in the general government and in the Atlantic states, unfriendly to their interests in regard to the Mississippi. They have been witnesses to the formation of two treaties, that with Great Britain and that with Spain, which secure to them every thing they could desire, in respect to our foreign relations, towards confirming their prosperity. Will it not be their wisdom to rely for the preservation of these advantages on the union by which they were procured? will they not henceforth be deaf to those advisers, if such there are, who would sever them from their brethren, and connect them with aliens?

"In considering the reasons that might disrupt our unity, it is a serious concern that any grounds exist for defining groups by geographical differences—northern and southernAtlantic and western; from which deceptive individuals might try to create a belief that there are genuine differences in local interests and perspectives. One tactic used by parties to gain influence in specific areas is to misrepresent the views and goals of other regions. You cannot protect yourselves too much from the jealousy and resentment that arise from these misrepresentations: they tend to alienate those who should be united by brotherly affection. The people in our western states have recently learned this lesson well: they have witnessed, through the negotiations by the executive and the unanimous approval by the senate of the treaty with Spain, as well as the widespread satisfaction across the United States, clear evidence of how unfounded the suspicions were about a policy in the federal government and in the Atlantic states that was hostile to their interests regarding the Mississippi. They have observed the formation of two treaties, one with Great Britain and the other with Spain, which guarantee them everything they could wish for in terms of our foreign relations, securing their prosperity. Should it not be wise for them to rely on the union that made these advantages possible? Will they not now ignore those advisors, if there are any, who would drive a wedge between them and their fellow citizens, and instead connect them with outsiders?"

"To the efficacy and permanency of your union, a government for the whole is indispensable. No alliances, however strict, between the parts can be an adequate substitute; they must inevitably experience the infractions and interruptions which all alliances, in all times, have experienced. Sensible of this momentous truth, you have improved upon your first essay, by the adoption of a constitution of government better calculated than your former for an intimate union, and for the efficacious management of your common concerns. This government, the offspring of our own choice uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government.—But the constitution which at any time exists, until changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government, presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.

"To ensure the effectiveness and longevity of your union, a government for everyone is essential. No matter how strong the connections between the individual parts are, they can't adequately replace this; they will unavoidably face the same breakdowns and interruptions that all alliances have faced throughout history. Aware of this important truth, you've built on your initial attempt by adopting a constitution that is better suited for a close union and for effectively managing your shared interests. This government, created by our own choice without outside influence or pressure, was established after thorough investigation and careful consideration. It is completely free in its principles, balances security with energy in how it distributes power, and includes a way to amend itself, which gives it a legitimate claim to your trust and support. Respect for its authority, following its laws, and accepting its measures are all duties required by the fundamental principles of true freedom. The foundation of our political systems is the right of the people to create and change their government constitutions. However, any existing constitution is sacredly binding on everyone until it is altered by a clear and official act of the entire populace. The very concept of the people's power and right to establish a government implies that every individual has a duty to obey the established government."

"All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberations and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency.—They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force, to put in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common councils, and modified by mutual interests.

"Any barriers to enforcing the laws, any groups or organizations formed under whatever convincing pretext, with the real aim of influencing, controlling, undermining, or intimidating the normal discussions and actions of the established authorities, are damaging to this fundamental principle and have harmful consequences. They help organize factions, giving them an artificial and excessive power, replacing the will of the nation with the will of a party, often a small but clever and ambitious minority of the community; and, depending on which party is in power, turning public administration into a reflection of poorly coordinated and conflicting factional plans instead of an instrument of consistent and beneficial strategies developed through collective discussions and shaped by shared interests."

"However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men, will be enabled to subvert the power of the people, and to usurp for themselves the reins of government; destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

"However, combinations or associations like the ones mentioned may sometimes serve popular purposes, they are likely, over time, to become powerful tools that allow cunning, ambitious, and unscrupulous individuals to undermine the power of the people and take control of the government for themselves, ultimately destroying the very tools that helped elevate them to unjust authority."

"Towards the preservation of your government and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretext. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system; and thus to undermine what can not be directly overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments, as of other human institutions:—that experience is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country:—that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion: and remember, especially, that for the efficient management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigour as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.

"To preserve your government and maintain your current happy state, it's essential to not only firmly reject irregular challenges to its recognized authority, but also to carefully resist any spirit of change to its principles, no matter how convincing the excuses may seem. One way to attack could be by making changes to the structure of the constitution that weaken the system's effectiveness, thus undermining what cannot be directly destroyed. In all the changes you may be tempted to adopt, remember that time and established practices are just as necessary to define the true nature of governments as they are for other human institutions: that experience is the best measure to determine the real tendencies of the current constitution of a country: that ease of change based on mere theories and opinions exposes you to constant transformation due to the endless variety of ideas and beliefs: and especially remember that to effectively manage your shared interests in a country as vast as ours, a government with enough strength to ensure the complete security of liberty is essential. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers appropriately divided and balanced, its best protector. It is, in fact, little more than a word if the government is too weak to resist the actions of factions, to keep each member of society within the legal limits, and to ensure everyone enjoys their rights to person and property peacefully and securely."

"I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the state, with particular references to the founding them on geographical discriminations. Let us now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

"I've already hinted at the dangers of political parties, especially when they're based on geographic differences. Now, let's take a broader look and seriously warn you about the harmful effects of partisan spirit as a whole."

"This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind.—It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

"This spirit, unfortunately, is a part of our nature, rooted in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists in various forms across all governments, each more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but in popular governments, it is most pronounced and is truly their worst enemy."

"The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge natural to party dissension, which, in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism.—But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result, gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and, sooner or later, the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation on the ruins of public liberty.

"The ongoing control of one group over another, intensified by the natural urge for revenge that comes with party conflicts, has led to some of the most terrible atrocities in various times and places. This alone is a frightening form of tyranny. Eventually, this leads to a more formal and lasting tyranny. The chaos and suffering that follow make people more inclined to seek safety and comfort in the absolute power of one person; and sooner or later, the leader of the dominant faction, who is either more capable or more fortunate than others, uses this tendency to elevate himself at the expense of public freedom."

"Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind, (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight,) the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party, are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

"Without anticipating such an extreme situation (which, however, shouldn't be completely ignored), the everyday and ongoing harms caused by party spirit are enough for a wise population to make it their duty to dissuade and limit it."

"It serves always to distract the public councils, and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles the animosity of one part against another; foments occasional riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

"It always distracts public discussions and weakens government operations. It stirs up the community with baseless suspicions and false alarms; fuels hostility between different groups; and sparks occasional riots and uprisings. It also allows foreign influence and corruption to seep in, making it easier for them to access the government through party loyalties. As a result, the interests and decisions of one country become subject to those of another."

"There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government, and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This, within certain limits, is probably true; and, in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favour, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be, by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent it bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

"There’s a belief that political parties in free countries help keep the government in check and maintain the spirit of liberty. This is probably true to some extent; in monarchies, patriotism might tolerate, if not embrace, the party spirit. However, in governments that are purely elective, that spirit shouldn’t be encouraged. Given its natural tendency, there will always be enough of that spirit for all beneficial purposes. Since there’s a constant risk of it going too far, public opinion should work to ease and control it. It’s like a fire that can’t be put out; it requires constant vigilance to prevent it from flaring up, so it doesn’t end up causing destruction instead of providing warmth."

"It is important likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those intrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department, to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power and proneness to abuse it which predominate in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositories, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions of the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern: some of them in our country, and under our own eyes.—To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the constitution designates.—But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil, any partial or transient benefit which the use can at any time yield.

"It’s also important that the way we think in a free country encourages caution in those responsible for its governance, so they stay within their specific constitutional roles and avoid stepping on each other's toes. The tendency to overreach leads to the consolidation of power into one department, which ultimately creates, regardless of the government’s structure, a real form of despotism. A clear understanding of our natural inclination towards power and potential abuse is enough to confirm this idea. The need for mutual checks in political power—by splitting and distributing it among different holders, each acting as a protector of the public good against the encroachment of the others—has been demonstrated through ancient and modern examples: some right here in our own country, right before our eyes. Maintaining these checks is as essential as establishing them. If people believe that the distribution or alteration of constitutional powers is incorrect, it should be corrected through an amendment in the manner the constitution specifies. But there should be no change through usurpation; while this might sometimes lead to good, it’s typically the weapon that destroys free governments. The long-term harm of such a precedent will always far outweigh any short-term benefit it might provide."

"Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labour to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them.—A volume could not trace all their connexions with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked, where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? And let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

"Of all the traits and habits that contribute to political success, religion and morality are essential supports. Anyone who tries to undermine these fundamental pillars of human happiness and the duties of individuals and citizens cannot truly claim to be patriotic. Both politicians and religious individuals should respect and uphold them. A book couldn’t capture all their connections to personal and public well-being. We should simply ask, where is the security for property, reputation, and life if the sense of religious obligation abandons the oaths that are the basis of justice in courts? And we should carefully consider the idea that morality can exist without religion. Regardless of how much weight we give to the effects of advanced education on uniquely structured minds, both reason and experience tell us that national morality cannot thrive without a foundation in religious principles."

"It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who that is a sincere friend to it can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric?

"It is fundamentally true that virtue or morality is an essential foundation of a democratic government. This principle applies with varying degrees of strength to all types of free government. Who can be a true supporter of it and remain indifferent to efforts to undermine its foundation?"

"Promote, then, as an object of primary importance, institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it should be enlightened.

"Promote, then, as a primary focus, institutions for the widespread sharing of knowledge. As the framework of a government strengthens public opinion, it should also be informed."

"As a very important source of strength and security, cherish public credit. One method of preserving it is to use it as sparingly as possible, avoiding occasions of expense by cultivating peace, but remembering also, that timely disbursements, to prepare for danger, frequently prevent much greater disbursements to repel it; avoiding likewise the accumulation of debt, not only by shunning occasions of expense, but by vigorous exertions in time of peace, to discharge the debts which unavoidable wars may have occasioned, not ungenerously throwing upon posterity the burden which we ourselves ought to bear. The execution of these maxims belongs to your representatives, but it is necessary that public opinion should co-operate. To facilitate to them the performance of their duty, it is essential that you should practically bear in mind, that towards the payment of debts there must be revenue; that to have revenue, there must be taxes; that no taxes can be devised which are not more or less inconvenient and unpleasant; that the intrinsic embarrassment inseparable from the selection of the proper objects, (which is always a choice of difficulties,) ought to be a decisive motive for a candid construction of the conduct of the government in making it, and for a spirit of acquiescence in the measures for obtaining revenue, which the public exigencies may at any time dictate.

"As a crucial source of strength and security, value public credit. One way to maintain it is to use it as little as possible, avoiding unnecessary expenses by promoting peace. However, also remember that timely spending to prepare for danger often prevents much larger costs to deal with it later. Avoid accumulating debt, not just by steering clear of expenses, but also by actively working during peacetime to pay off the debts incurred by unavoidable wars, rather than unfairly passing the burden onto future generations. Your representatives are responsible for carrying out these principles, but it's essential that public opinion supports them. To help them fulfill their responsibilities, keep in mind that paying off debts requires revenue; to generate revenue, taxes must be imposed; and all taxes come with some level of inconvenience or discomfort. The inherent challenges that come with choosing the right tax targets (which is always a difficult decision) should motivate a fair understanding of the government's actions in this regard, and foster a willingness to accept the measures needed to raise revenue that the public's needs may require at any moment."

"Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be that good policy does not equally enjoin it? it will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and, at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt but, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it; can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue? the experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices?

"Show good faith and fairness towards all nations; promote peace and harmony with everyone. Religion and morality demand this behavior; and can it really be that good policy doesn't also require it? It would be admirable for a free and enlightened nation, soon to be great, to set a generous and unprecedented example of a people always guided by a high sense of justice and kindness. Who can doubt that over time, the benefits of such a plan would more than compensate for any short-term losses from sticking to it? Can it be that Providence hasn't linked a nation's lasting happiness to its virtues? At the very least, this idea is backed by every principle that elevates human nature. Unfortunately, is it made impossible by its flaws?

"In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness, is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another, disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility, instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives.—The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty of nations has been the victim.

"In carrying out such a plan, nothing is more important than to eliminate deep-seated hatreds towards certain nations and intense loyalties to others; instead, fair and friendly feelings towards all should be fostered. A nation that harbors habitual hatred or excessive affection for another is, in a way, enslaved. It is enslaved by its hostility or its love, either of which can lead it away from its responsibilities and interests. Hatred from one nation towards another makes it more likely to insult and harm, to seize on minor grievances, and to act arrogantly and unreasonably when minor conflicts arise. This leads to frequent clashes that are stubborn, poisonous, and bloody. A nation driven by ill will and resentment can sometimes push its government into war, going against sound political judgment. The government can sometimes go along with the national sentiment and act on emotions that reason would typically dismiss; at other times, it may exploit the nation's animosity for aggression driven by pride, ambition, and other harmful motives. As a result, peace, and perhaps even the freedom of nations, has often been sacrificed."

"So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favourite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate inducements or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favourite nation, of privileges denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained; and by exciting jealousy, ill will, and a disposition to retaliate in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld: and it gives to ambitious, corrupted or deluded citizens who devote themselves to the favourite nation, facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

So too, a strong attachment of one country to another leads to all sorts of problems. Sympathy for the favored nation creates an illusion of a shared interest in situations where no real common interest exists, and it brings in the resentments of one nation into the other. This drags the former into the conflicts and wars of the latter, without sufficient reasons or justification. It also results in giving the favored nation privileges that are denied to others, which can harm the nation making these concessions in two ways: by unnecessarily giving up what should have been kept, and by causing jealousy, hostility, and a desire for revenge among those from whom equal privileges are withheld. Moreover, it provides ambitious, corrupt, or misled citizens who ally themselves with the favored nation an opportunity to betray or sacrifice their own country’s interests without facing backlash, sometimes even gaining popularity; masking with the appearance of a virtuous obligation, a commendable respect for public opinion, or a worthy enthusiasm for the public good, the base or foolish actions driven by ambition, corruption, or delusion.

"As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practise the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils!—such an attachment of a small or weak, towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter.

"As channels for foreign influence in countless ways, such connections are especially concerning to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many chances do they provide to interfere with domestic factions, to employ manipulation, to mislead public opinion, and to sway or intimidate public decision-making!—such a connection of a smaller or weaker entity towards a large and powerful nation ultimately makes the former a satellite of the latter."

"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence, (I conjure you to believe me, fellow citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake; since history and experience prove, that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy, to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defence against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation, and excessive dislike for another, cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favourite, are liable to become suspected and odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

"Against the sneaky tactics of foreign influence, (I urge you to believe me, fellow citizens) the caution of a free people should be constantly alert; since history and experience show that foreign influence is one of the most harmful enemies of a republican government. However, for that caution to be effective, it must be fair; otherwise, it becomes a tool of the very influence we want to avoid, instead of a defense against it. Overly favoring one foreign nation and excessively disliking another leads people to see danger only from one side and serves to hide and even support the efforts of influence from the other. True patriots, who may resist the schemes of the favored nation, risk being viewed with suspicion and dislike; while its supporters and dupes win the public's praise and trust, only to betray their interests."

"The great rule of conduct for us, in regard to foreign nations, is, in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connexion as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith.—Here, let us stop.

"The main guideline for us when it comes to foreign countries is to keep our political connections as minimal as possible while expanding our trade relationships. As for existing commitments, let’s honor them with complete honesty. —Here, let's end this."

"Europe has a set of primary interests, which to us have none, or a very remote relation. Hence, she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns.—Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves, by artificial ties, in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities.

"Europe has a main set of interests that don’t really relate to us or only do so in a very distant way. Because of this, she often gets caught up in disputes that mostly have nothing to do with our concerns. Therefore, it would be unwise for us to tie ourselves artificially to the usual ups and downs of her politics or the typical alliances and conflicts of her friendships or enmities."

"Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people, under an efficient government, the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon, to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.

"Our separate and distant position allows us to follow a different path. If we stay united as one nation under a strong government, it won't be long before we can stand strong against outside threats; when we can adopt a stance that ensures our neutrality is carefully honored; when warring countries, unable to gain from us, won't risk provoking us; when we can choose peace or war based on what serves our interests and is just."

"Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humour, or caprice?

"Why give up the benefits of such a unique situation? Why leave our own to stand on foreign soil? Why, by intertwining our future with any part of Europe, risk our peace and prosperity in the complexities of European ambitions, rivalries, interests, moods, or whims?"

"It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But in my opinion, it is unnecessary, and would be unwise to extend them.

"It’s really our policy to avoid permanent alliances with any part of the foreign world, as much as we're free to do that right now; I don’t mean to suggest that I support breaking existing commitments. I believe the principle applies just as much to public matters as it does to private ones: honesty is always the best policy. So I say again, those commitments should be honored in their true meaning. However, I think it’s unnecessary and unwise to expand them."

"Taking care always to keep ourselves, by suitable establishments, on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies.

"Always making sure to maintain a respectable defensive stance through appropriate measures, we can confidently rely on temporary alliances for exceptional circumstances."

"Harmony, and a liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favours or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them, conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view, that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favours from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favours, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect, or calculate upon real favours from nation to nation. It is an illusion which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard.

"Harmony and open relationships with all nations are encouraged by policy, humanity, and self-interest. However, our trade policy should be fair and unbiased; we shouldn't seek or give special favors or preferences. We should follow the natural flow of things, gently encouraging commerce to spread and diversify without forcing anything. We need to establish trade agreements with like-minded countries to create stability, define our merchants' rights, and enable the government to support them. These agreements should be the best we can manage based on current circumstances and mutual understanding, but they will be temporary and subject to change as we gain experience and the situation evolves. We must always remember that it's foolish for one nation to expect unselfish favors from another; if it accepts such favors, it will likely compromise some of its independence. By accepting these favors, it may end up in a position of having provided value in exchange for nominal favors but still be accused of ingratitude for not giving more. There’s no greater mistake than to anticipate or rely on true favors between nations. It’s an illusion that experience should correct and that a sense of pride should dismiss."

"In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the passions; or prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations; but if I may even flatter myself, that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare by which they have been dictated.

"In sharing these pieces of advice with you, my fellow citizens, I don’t expect them to leave the strong and lasting impression I hope for; that they will control the usual flow of emotions; or stop our nation from following the path that has historically shaped the fate of nations. However, if I can even convince myself that they might bring some minor benefit, some occasional good; that they might occasionally help tone down the intensity of party spirit, warn against the dangers of foreign interference, and protect against the deception of so-called patriotism; this hope will be more than enough reward for the concern for your well-being that inspired them."

"How far, in the discharge of my official duties, I have been guided by the principles which have been delineated, the public records and other evidences of my conduct must witness to you and to the world. To myself, the assurance of my own conscience is, that I have, at least, believed myself to be guided by them.

"How far I have followed the principles laid out in my official duties can be seen in the public records and other evidence of my actions. For myself, I take comfort in knowing that I have, at the very least, believed I was guided by them."

"In relation to the still subsisting war in Europe, my proclamation of the 22d of April, 1793, is the index to my plan. Sanctioned by your approving voice, and by that of your representatives in both houses of congress; the spirit of that measure has continually governed me; uninfluenced by any attempts to deter or divert me from it.

"In connection with the ongoing war in Europe, my announcement from April 22, 1793, outlines my plan. Supported by your approval and that of your representatives in both houses of Congress, the essence of that measure has consistently guided me, unaffected by any efforts to discourage or distract me from it."

"After deliberate examination, with the aid of the best lights I could obtain, I was well satisfied that our country, under all the circumstances of the case, had a right to take, and was bound, in duty and interest, to take a neutral position.—Having taken it, I determined, as far as should depend upon me, to maintain it with moderation, perseverance, and firmness.

"After careful consideration, with the best resources I could find, I was confident that our country, given all the circumstances, had the right to remain neutral and was obligated, both morally and practically, to do so. Having made this decision, I resolved, to the best of my ability, to uphold it with restraint, persistence, and determination."

"The considerations which respect the right to hold this conduct, it is not necessary on this occasion to detail.—I will only observe that, according to my understanding of the matter, that right, so far from being denied by any of the belligerent powers, has been virtually admitted by all.

"The considerations regarding the right to engage in this behavior don't need to be discussed in detail right now. I will only point out that, from my perspective, this right has not been denied by any of the warring powers and has, in fact, been essentially recognized by all."

"The duty of holding a neutral conduct may be inferred, without anything more, from the obligation which justice and humanity impose on every nation, in cases in which it is free to act, to maintain inviolate the relations of peace and amity towards other nations.

"The responsibility of maintaining a neutral stance can be understood, without needing anything more, from the obligation that justice and humanity place on every nation, when it has the freedom to act, to uphold peaceful and friendly relations with other nations."

"The inducements of interest for observing that conduct will best be referred to your own reflections and experience. With me, a predominant motive has been to endeavour to gain time to our country to settle and mature its yet recent institutions, and to progress, without interruption, to that degree of strength and consistency which is necessary to give it, humanly speaking, the command of its own fortunes.

"The reasons for paying attention to that behavior will be best understood through your own thoughts and experiences. For me, a major motivation has been to try to give our country the time it needs to establish and develop its new institutions, and to move forward, without disruptions, to the level of strength and stability necessary for it to, realistically speaking, take control of its own future."

"Though in reviewing the incidents of my administration, I am unconscious of intentional error; I am nevertheless too sensible of my defects not to think it probable that I may have committed many errors. Whatever they may be, I fervently beseech the Almighty to avert or mitigate the evils to which they may tend. I shall also carry with me the hope that my country will never cease to view them with indulgence; and that, after forty-five years of my life dedicated to its service, with an upright zeal, the faults of incompetent abilities will be consigned to oblivion, as myself must soon be to the mansions of rest.

"While looking back at my time in office, I'm not aware of any intentional mistakes; however, I am too aware of my shortcomings to think that I haven't made many errors. No matter what they are, I sincerely pray that the Almighty will prevent or lessen any harm they might cause. I also hold on to the hope that my country will always view these mistakes with kindness; and that, after dedicating forty-five years of my life to its service with sincere enthusiasm, any faults due to my limited abilities will be forgotten, just as I will soon be laid to rest."

"Relying on its kindness in this as in other things, and actuated by that fervent love towards it, which is so natural to a man who views in it the native soil of himself and his progenitors for several generations; I anticipate with pleasing expectation that retreat in which I promise myself to realize, without alloy, the sweet enjoyment of partaking, in the midst of my fellow citizens, the benign influence of good laws under a free government—the ever favourite object of my heart, and the happy reward, as I trust, of our mutual cares, labours, and dangers."

"Trusting in its kindness as in other matters, and driven by that deep love for it, which is so typical of someone who sees it as the homeland of himself and his ancestors for many generations; I look forward with great anticipation to that retreat where I hope to fully experience, without any distraction, the sweet joy of enjoying, alongside my fellow citizens, the positive effects of good laws under a free government—the lifelong passion of my heart, and the rewarding outcome, as I believe, of our shared efforts, work, and sacrifices."

The sentiments of veneration with which this address was generally received, were manifested in almost every part of the union. Some of the state legislatures directed it to be inserted at large in their journals; and nearly all of them passed resolutions expressing their respect for the person of the President, their high sense of his exalted services, and the emotions with which they contemplated his retirement from office. Although the leaders of party might rejoice at this event it produced solemn and anxious reflections in the great body even of those who belonged to the opposition.

The feelings of respect with which this address was received were evident all across the country. Some state legislatures ordered it to be published in full in their records, and almost all passed resolutions showing their respect for the President, their appreciation of his outstanding service, and the feelings they experienced regarding his departure from office. While party leaders might celebrate this event, it led to serious and worried thoughts among many, even those in opposition.

The person in whom alone the voice of the people could be united having declined a re-election, the two great parties in America brought forward their respective chiefs; and every possible effort was made by each, to obtain the victory. Mr. John Adams and Mr. Thomas Pinckney, the late minister at London, were supported as President and Vice President by the federalists: the whole force of the opposite party was exerted in favour of Mr. Jefferson.

The one person who could unify the people's voice chose not to run for re-election, so the two major parties in America put forward their own leaders, and both sides did everything they could to win. The federalists backed Mr. John Adams for President and Mr. Thomas Pinckney, the former minister in London, for Vice President, while the entire opposing party rallied behind Mr. Jefferson.

Motives of vast influence were added, on this occasion, to those which usually impel men in a struggle to retain or acquire power. The continuance or the change not only of those principles on which the internal affairs of the United States had been administered, but of the conduct which had been observed towards foreign nations, was believed to depend on the choice of a chief magistrate. By one party, the system pursued by the existing administration with regard to the belligerent powers, had been uniformly approved; by the other, it had been as uniformly condemned. In the contests therefore which preceded the choice of electors, the justice of the complaints which were made on the part of the French republic were minutely discussed, and the consequences which were to be apprehended from her resentment, or from yielding to her pretensions, were reciprocally urged as considerations entitled to great weight in the ensuing election.

Motives of significant influence were added this time to those that typically drive people in their bid to keep or gain power. The continuation or change of the principles governing the internal affairs of the United States, as well as the approach taken towards foreign nations, was believed to hinge on the selection of a chief leader. One party consistently supported the policies of the current administration regarding the warring nations, while the other party consistently opposed them. Consequently, in the debates leading up to the selection of electors, the validity of the complaints from the French republic was thoroughly examined, and the potential consequences of her anger or of giving in to her demands were highlighted as key factors in the upcoming election.

The minister of France endeavors to influence the approaching election.

In such a struggle, it was not to be expected that foreign powers could feel absolutely unconcerned. In November, while the parties were so balanced that neither scale could be perceived to preponderate, Mr. Adet addressed a letter to the secretary of state, in which he recapitulated the numerous complaints which had been urged by himself and his predecessors, against the government of the United States; and reproached that government, in terms of great asperity, with violating those treaties which had secured its independence, with ingratitude to France, and with partiality to England. These wrongs, which commenced with the "insidious" proclamation of neutrality, were said to be so aggravated by the treaty concluded with Great Britain, that Mr. Adet announced the orders of the Directory to suspend his ministerial functions with the federal government. "But the cause," he added, "which had so long restrained the just resentment of the executive Directory from bursting forth, now tempered its effects. The name of America, notwithstanding the wrongs of its government, still excited sweet emotions in the hearts of Frenchmen; and the executive Directory wished not to break with a people whom they loved to salute with the appellation of a friend." This suspension of his functions therefore was not to be regarded "as a rupture between France and the United States, but as a mark of just discontent which was to last until the government of the United States returned to sentiments and to measure more conformable to the interests of the alliance, and to the sworn friendship between the two nations."

In such a struggle, it wasn’t expected that foreign powers could feel completely unconcerned. In November, as the parties were so evenly matched that neither side could be seen as having an advantage, Mr. Adet sent a letter to the Secretary of State. In it, he summarized the many complaints made by himself and his predecessors against the U.S. government; he criticized that government harshly for violating the treaties that ensured its independence, showing ingratitude to France, and favoring England. These grievances, which began with the "insidious" neutrality proclamation, were said to be worsened by the treaty made with Great Britain. Mr. Adet then announced the orders of the Directory to suspend his official duties with the federal government. "But the reason," he continued, "that had long held back the rightful anger of the executive Directory from surfacing, now softened its impact. The name of America, despite the wrongs of its government, still evoked positive feelings in the hearts of the French people; and the executive Directory did not want to sever ties with a nation they were happy to call a friend." Thus, this suspension of his duties should not be seen "as a break between France and the United States, but as a sign of rightful dissatisfaction that would last until the U.S. government returned to views and actions more aligned with the interests of the alliance and the sworn friendship between the two nations."

This letter was concluded in the following terms:

This letter ended with the following statement:

"Alas! Time has not yet demolished the fortifications with which the English roughened this country—nor those the Americans raised for their defence; their half rounded summits still appear in every quarter, amidst plains, on the tops of mountains. The traveller need not search for the ditch which served to encompass them; it is still open under his feet. Scattered ruins of houses laid waste, which the fire had partly respected, in order to leave monuments of British fury, are still to be found.—Men still exist, who can say, here a ferocious Englishman slaughtered my father; there my wife tore her bleeding daughter from the hands of an unbridled Englishman.—Alas! the soldiers who fell under the sword of the Britons are not yet reduced to dust: the labourer in turning up his field, still draws from the bosom of the earth their whitened bones; while the ploughman, with tears of tenderness and gratitude, still recollects that his fields, now covered with rich harvests, have been moistened with French blood. While every thing around the inhabitants of this country animates them to speak of the tyranny of Great Britain, and of the generosity of Frenchmen; when England has declared a war of death to that nation, to avenge herself for its having cemented with its blood the independence of the United States:—It was at this moment their government made a treaty of amity with their ancient tyrant, the implacable enemy of their ancient ally. Oh Americans covered with noble scars! Oh you who have so often flown to death and to victory with French soldiers! You who know those generous sentiments which distinguish the true warrior! whose hearts have always vibrated with those of your companions in arms! consult them to-day to know what they experience; recollect at the same time, that if magnanimous souls with liveliness resent an affront, they also know how to forget one. Let your government return to itself, and you will still find in Frenchmen faithful friends and generous allies."

"Unfortunately, time hasn't yet destroyed the fortifications that the English built in this country—nor those that the Americans created for their defense; their rounded tops can still be seen everywhere, in the plains and on mountain peaks. The traveler doesn’t need to look for the ditch that once surrounded them; it’s still visible beneath his feet. Scattered ruins of houses that were partly spared by fire remain, serving as reminders of British brutality. There are still people who can say, 'Here a brutal Englishman killed my father; there my wife snatched her bleeding daughter from the hands of a raging Englishman.' Sadly, the soldiers who fell to British swords haven’t turned to dust yet: when farmers till their fields, they still uncover their bleached bones; and the plowman, with tears of fondness and gratitude, remembers that his fields, now rich with harvests, were soaked with French blood. Everything around the people in this country encourages them to talk about the tyranny of Great Britain and the generosity of the French; at the moment when England declared a war of vengeance against France for cementing the independence of the United States with its blood, their government formed a friendship treaty with their old oppressor, the relentless enemy of their former ally. Oh Americans marked with noble scars! Oh you who have so often faced death and victory alongside French soldiers! You who understand the generous feelings that define a true warrior! Whose hearts have always resonated with those of your fellow soldiers! Talk to them today to learn what they feel; remember that if noble souls passionately resent an affront, they also know how to forgive one. Let your government find its way back to itself, and you will still find in the French faithful friends and generous allies."

 

Martha Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

Martha Washington's Bedroom at Mount Vernon

Returning to their beloved Mount Vernon with General Washington after his retirement, in 1796, as First President of the United States, Martha Washington seldom spent a night away from the historic mansion overlooking the Potomac. There she continued to offer a gracious hospitality to the many visitors attracted by her distinguished husband. She never recovered from his death in 1799, and dwelt in deep mourning until she followed him, May 22, 1802. Her remains rest with those of Washington in the vault at Mount Vernon.

After General Washington retired as the First President of the United States in 1796, he returned to their beloved Mount Vernon, and Martha Washington rarely spent a night away from the historic mansion overlooking the Potomac. There, she continued to extend warm hospitality to the many visitors drawn by her notable husband. She never fully moved on from his death in 1799 and remained in deep mourning until she passed away on May 22, 1802. Her remains are buried alongside Washington’s in the vault at Mount Vernon.

 

As if to remove all doubts respecting the purpose for which this extraordinary letter was written, a copy was, on the day of its date, transmitted to a printer for publication.

As if to clear up any doubts about the purpose of this remarkable letter, a copy was sent to a printer for publication on the same day it was dated.

Whatever motives might have impelled Mr. Adet to make this open and direct appeal to the American people, in the critical moment of their election of a chief magistrate, it does not appear, in any material degree, to have influenced that election. Many reflecting men, who had condemned the course of the administration, could not approve this interference in the internal affairs of the United States; and the opposite party, generally, resented it as an attempt to control the operations of the American people in the exercise of one of the highest acts of sovereignty, and to poison the fountain of their liberty and independence, by mingling foreign intrigue with their elections. Viewing it as a fulfilment of their most gloomy prognostics respecting the designs of France to establish an influence in the councils of America, they believed the best interests of their country to require that it should be defeated; and their exertions against the candidate Mr. Adet was understood to favour, were the more determined and the more vigorous.

Whatever reasons may have motivated Mr. Adet to make this open and direct appeal to the American people during the crucial moment of their election for a leader, it doesn’t seem to have significantly impacted that election. Many thoughtful individuals, who had criticized the administration's actions, did not approve of this interference in the internal matters of the United States; and the opposing party generally viewed it as an attempt to manipulate the American people's decision in one of their most important democratic processes, and to taint their liberty and independence by involving foreign influence in their elections. Seeing it as a confirmation of their darkest fears regarding France's intentions to gain influence in American politics, they believed that the best interests of their country demanded that this interference be resisted; thus, their efforts against the candidate Mr. Adet was perceived to support were more determined and vigorous.

The president's speech to congress.

On the 7th of December, while this dubious and ardently contested election was depending, the President, for the last time, met the national legislature in the senate chamber. His address on the occasion was comprehensive, temperate, and dignified. In presenting a full and clear view of the situation of the United States, and in recommending those great national measures, in the utility of which he felt a confidence, no personal considerations could induce the omission of those, to which open and extensive hostility had been avowed.

On December 7th, while this questionable and fiercely contested election was ongoing, the President met with the national legislature in the Senate chamber for the last time. His speech at the event was thorough, calm, and dignified. In providing a clear and complete overview of the situation in the United States and in endorsing important national initiatives that he believed were beneficial, he was not swayed by personal concerns to skip over those issues that had faced open and widespread opposition.

After congratulating congress on the internal situation of the United States, and on the progress of that humane system which had been adopted for the preservation of peace with their Indian neighbours; after stating the measures which had been taken in execution of the treaties with Great Britain, Spain, and Algiers, and the negotiations which were pending with Tunis and Tripoli; he proceeded to say:

After congratulating Congress on the current state of the United States and the progress of the humane system that had been put in place to maintain peace with their Indian neighbors; after outlining the steps that had been taken to implement the treaties with Great Britain, Spain, and Algiers, and the ongoing negotiations with Tunis and Tripoli; he went on to say:

"To an active external commerce, the protection of a naval force is indispensable—this is manifest with regard to wars in which a state is itself a party—but besides this, it is in our own experience, that the most sincere neutrality is not a sufficient guard against the depredations of nations at war. To secure respect to a neutral flag, requires a naval force, organized and ready to vindicate it from insult or aggression—this may even prevent the necessity of going to war, by discouraging belligerent powers from committing such violations of the rights of the neutral party, as may first or last, leave no other option. From the best information I have been able to obtain, it would seem as if our trade to the Mediterranean, without a protecting force, will always be insecure; and our citizens exposed to the calamities from which numbers of them have but just been relieved.

"To support active international trade, having a naval force is essential—this is clear when a country is directly involved in wars—but from our own experience, we know that even the strongest neutrality isn't enough to protect against the attacks of warring nations. To ensure that a neutral flag is respected, a naval force needs to be organized and ready to defend it against insults or aggression—this can even help avoid the need for war by deterring warring nations from infringing on the rights of neutral parties, which could otherwise leave us with no choice. Based on the best information I could find, it seems that our trade in the Mediterranean will always be at risk without a protective force, and our citizens could face the disasters that many of them have only recently escaped."

"These considerations invite the United States to look to the means, and to set about the gradual creation of a navy. The increasing progress of their navigation promises them, at no distant period, the requisite supply of seamen; and their means, in other respects, favour the undertaking. It is an encouragement likewise, that their particular situation will give weight, and influence, to a moderate naval force in their hands. Will it not then be adviseable, to begin without delay, to provide and lay up the materials for the building and equipping of ships of war; and to proceed in the work by degrees, in proportion as our resources shall render it practicable, without inconvenience; so that a future war of Europe may not find our commerce in the same unprotected state, in which it was found by the present?"

"These thoughts encourage the United States to explore the means and start gradually building a navy. The growth of their shipping industry suggests that, in the near future, they will have the necessary supply of sailors; and their resources, in other areas, support this effort. Additionally, their unique position will enhance the impact and influence of a modest naval force in their possession. Would it not be wise to begin immediately to gather and store the materials for constructing and equipping warships; and to move forward with the project step by step, in line with the resources we have available, without causing any disruption? This way, a future European war won't leave our trade vulnerable as it was in the present situation."

The speech next proceeded earnestly to recommend the establishment of national works for manufacturing such articles as were necessary for the defence of the country; and also of an institution which should grow up under the patronage of the public, and be devoted to the improvement of agriculture. The advantages of a military academy,[47] and of a national university, were also urged; and the necessity of augmenting the compensations to the officers of the United States, in various instances, was explicitly stated.

The speech then passionately advocated for the creation of national facilities to produce essential items for the country's defense, as well as for an institution supported by the public that would focus on improving agriculture. The benefits of having a military academy,[47] and a national university were also emphasized, along with a clear call to increase the salaries for U.S. officers in various cases.

Adverting to the dissatisfaction which had been expressed by one of the great powers of Europe, the President said, "while in our external relations some serious inconveniences and embarrassments have been overcome, and others lessened, it is with much pain and deep regret I mention, that circumstances of a very unwelcome nature have lately occurred. Our trade has suffered, and is suffering extensive injuries in the West Indies from the cruisers and agents of the French republic; and communications have been received from its minister here, which indicate the danger of a further disturbance of our commerce by its authority; and which are, in other respects, far from agreeable.

Referring to the dissatisfaction expressed by one of the major powers in Europe, the President said, "While we've managed to overcome some serious challenges and ease others in our international relations, it pains me to mention that some very unwelcome developments have recently occurred. Our trade in the West Indies is experiencing significant damage due to the actions of the French republic's cruisers and agents, and we've received communications from its minister here that suggest there’s a risk of further disruption to our commerce by their authority, which are, in other respects, quite unsatisfactory."

"It has been my constant, sincere and earnest wish, in conformity with that of our nation, to maintain cordial harmony, and a perfectly friendly understanding with that republic. This wish remains unabated; and I shall persevere in the endeavour to fulfil it to the utmost extent of what shall be consistent with a just and indispensable regard to the rights and honour of our country; nor will I easily cease to cherish the expectation, that a spirit of justice, candour and friendship, on the part of the republic, will eventually ensure success.

"It has always been my genuine and serious wish, in line with that of our nation, to keep a warm relationship and a completely friendly understanding with that republic. This wish remains strong; and I will continue to strive to achieve it as much as possible while respecting the rights and honor of our country. I won't easily give up on the hope that a spirit of fairness, openness, and friendship from the republic will ultimately lead to success."

"In pursuing this course, however, I can not forget what is due to the character of our government and nation; or to a full and entire confidence in the good sense, patriotism, self-respect, and fortitude of my countrymen.

"In pursuing this course, however, I cannot forget what is owed to the character of our government and nation; or to a complete and total confidence in the good judgment, patriotism, self-respect, and resilience of my fellow citizens."

"I reserve for a special message, a more particular communication on this interesting subject."

"I'll save that for a special message, a more specific communication on this fascinating topic."

The flourishing state of the revenue, the expectation that the system for the gradual extinction of the national debt would be completed at this session, the anxiety which he felt respecting the militia, were successively mentioned, and the speech was concluded in the following terms:

The thriving state of the revenue, the anticipation that the plan for gradually eliminating the national debt would be finalized in this session, and the concern he felt regarding the militia were mentioned one after the other, and the speech ended with these words:

"The situation in which I now stand, for the last time, in the midst of the representatives of the people of the United States, naturally recalls the period when the administration of the present form of government commenced; and I can not omit the occasion to congratulate you, and my country, on the success of the experiment; nor to repeat my fervent supplications to the Supreme Ruler of the universe, and sovereign arbiter of nations, that his providential care may still be extended to the United States;—that the virtue and happiness of the people may be preserved; and that the government, which they have instituted for the protection of their liberties, may be perpetual."

"The situation I find myself in right now, for the last time, among the representatives of the people of the United States, naturally reminds me of when this current government began. I can’t miss this chance to congratulate you and my country on the success of this experiment; and I want to reiterate my heartfelt prayers to the Supreme Ruler of the universe and the sovereign arbiter of nations, that his caring guidance may continue to be with the United States—that the virtue and happiness of the people may be maintained; and that the government they have established to protect their freedoms may last forever."

The answer of the senate embraced the various topics of the speech, and approved every sentiment it contained.

The Senate's response covered all the points made in the speech and agreed with every sentiment expressed.

To a review of the prosperous situation of the interior of the United States, the senate subjoined—

To a review of the successful state of the interior of the United States, the senate added—

"Whilst contemplating the causes that produce this auspicious result, we must acknowledge the excellence of the constitutional system, and the wisdom of the legislative provisions;—but we should be deficient in gratitude and justice, did we not attribute a great portion of these advantages, to the virtue, firmness, and talents of your administration; which have been conspicuously displayed, in the most trying times, and on the most critical occasions—it is therefore, with the sincerest regrets, that we now receive an official notification of your intentions to retire from the public employments of your country.

"While reflecting on the reasons behind this positive outcome, we must recognize the quality of the constitutional system and the insight of the legislative measures; however, we would be lacking in gratitude and fairness if we didn’t credit a significant part of these benefits to the character, strength, and skills of your leadership, which have been clearly shown during the toughest times and most critical moments. Therefore, it is with deep regret that we now receive an official notice of your plans to step back from your public duties to your country."

"When we review the various scenes of your public life, so long and so successfully devoted to the most arduous services, civil and military; as well during the struggles of the American revolution, as the convulsive periods of a recent date, we can not look forward to your retirement without our warmest affections, and most anxious regards, accompanying you; and without mingling with our fellow citizens at large, in the sincerest wishes for your personal happiness, that sensibility and attachment can express.

"When we look back on the different moments of your public life, which you have dedicated so much time and effort to in both civil and military service—through the challenges of the American Revolution and the tumultuous times more recently—we can't think about you stepping back without feeling deep affection and concern for you. We join our fellow citizens in the heartfelt hopes for your happiness that genuine care and attachment can convey."

"The most effectual consolation that can offer for the loss we are about to sustain, arises from the animating reflection, that the influence of your example will extend to your successors, and the United States thus continue to enjoy an able, upright, and energetic administration."

"The most effective comfort we can find in the loss we're about to face comes from the uplifting thought that your example will inspire those who come after you, allowing the United States to keep benefiting from skilled, principled, and dynamic leadership."

In the house of representatives, a committee of five had been appointed to prepare a respectful answer to the speech, three of whom were friends to the administration. Knowing well that the several propositions it contained could not be noticed in detail, without occasioning a debate in which sentiments opposed to those of the address would be expressed, probably by a majority of the house; and hoping that the disposition would be general to avow in strong terms their attachment to the person and character of the President, the committee united in reporting an answer, which, in general terms, promised due attention to the various subjects recommended to their consideration, but was full and explicit in the expression of attachment to himself, and of approbation of his administration.

In the House of Representatives, a committee of five was chosen to draft a respectful response to the speech, with three members supporting the administration. Aware that the different proposals in the speech couldn't be addressed in detail without sparking a debate that might express views opposing those in the address—likely from a majority in the House—the committee hoped most members would openly declare their strong support for the President’s character and leadership. So, they agreed on a response that generally promised to consider the various topics put forth but was clear and direct about their loyalty to him and approval of his administration.

But the unanimity which prevailed in the committee did not extend to the house.

But the agreement that was present in the committee didn't carry over to the house.

After amplifying and strengthening the expressions of the report which stated the regrets of the house that any interruption should have taken place in the harmony which had subsisted between the United States and France, and modifying those which declared their hopes in the restoration of that affection which had formerly subsisted between the two republics, so as to avoid any implication that the rupture of that affection was exclusively ascribable to France, a motion was made by Mr. Giles to expunge from the answer the following paragraphs.

After enhancing and reinforcing the statements in the report that expressed the house's regret over any disruption in the harmony that had existed between the United States and France, and adjusting those that conveyed their hopes for the revival of the friendship that had once existed between the two republics, to ensure there was no suggestion that the breakdown of that friendship was solely blamed on France, Mr. Giles proposed a motion to remove the following paragraphs from the response.

"When we advert to the internal situation of the United States, we deem it equally natural and becoming to compare the present period with that immediately antecedent to the operation of the government, and to contrast it with the calamities in which the state of war still involves several of the European nations, as the reflections deduced from both tend to justify, as well as to excite a warmer admiration of our free constitution, and to exalt our minds to a more fervent and grateful sense of piety towards Almighty God for the beneficence of his Providence, by which its administration has been hitherto so remarkably distinguished.

"When we look at the current situation in the United States, it makes sense to compare this period with the time just before the government began operating, and to contrast it with the suffering that several European nations are still experiencing due to war. Both reflections help to justify and inspire a greater admiration for our free constitution, and elevate our thoughts to a deeper and more grateful sense of reverence towards Almighty God for the blessings of His Providence, which have notably characterized its administration so far."

"And while we entertain a grateful conviction that your wise, firm, and patriotic administration has been signally conducive to the success of the present form of government, we can not forbear to express the deep sensations of regret with which we contemplate your intended retirement from office.

"And while we hold a sincere belief that your wise, strong, and patriotic leadership has greatly contributed to the success of our current government, we cannot help but express our deep feelings of sorrow as we consider your planned departure from office."

"As no other suitable occasion may occur, we can not suffer the present to pass without attempting to disclose some of the emotions which it can not fail to awaken.

"As there may not be another suitable opportunity, we can't let this moment pass without trying to share some of the feelings it’s sure to stir up."

"The gratitude and admiration of your countrymen are still drawn to the recollection of those resplendent virtues and talents which were so eminently instrumental to the achievement of the revolution, and of which that glorious event will ever be the memorial. Your obedience to the voice of duty and your country, when you quitted reluctantly, a second time, the retreat you had chosen, and first accepted the presidency, afforded a new proof of the devotedness of your zeal in its service, and an earnest of the patriotism and success which have characterized your administration. As the grateful confidence of the citizens in the virtues of their chief magistrate has essentially contributed to that success, we persuade ourselves that the millions whom we represent, participate with us in the anxious solicitude of the present occasion.

"The gratitude and admiration of your fellow citizens are still directed towards the memory of those outstanding virtues and talents that were crucial to the success of the revolution, and that glorious event will always stand as a reminder of that. Your willingness to heed the call of duty and your country when you reluctantly took on the presidency a second time is yet another testament to your dedication to its service, and demonstrates the patriotism and achievements that have defined your leadership. Since the grateful trust of the citizens in the virtues of their leader has significantly contributed to that success, we believe that the millions we represent share in our deep concern for this moment."

"Yet we can not be unmindful that your moderation and magnanimity, twice displayed by retiring from your exalted stations, afford examples no less rare and instructive to mankind than valuable to a republic.

"Yet we cannot overlook that your restraint and generosity, shown twice by stepping down from your high positions, provide examples that are just as rare and educational for humanity as they are beneficial for a republic."

"Although we are sensible that this event, of itself, completes the lustre of a character already conspicuously unrivalled by the coincidence of virtue, talents, success, and public estimation; yet we conceive we owe it to you, sir, and still more emphatically to ourselves and to our nation, (of the language of whose hearts we presume to think ourselves, at this moment, the faithful interpreters) to express the sentiments with which it is contemplated.

"While we recognize that this event adds to the brilliance of a character that is already unmatched due to a combination of virtue, talent, success, and public regard, we believe it's important to convey our feelings about it to you, sir, and even more so to ourselves and our nation, whose emotions we believe we understand at this moment."

"The spectacle of a free and enlightened nation offering by its representatives the tribute of unfeigned approbation to its first citizen, however novel and interesting it may be, derives all its lustre (a lustre which accident or enthusiasm could not bestow, and which adulation would tarnish) from the transcendent merit, of which it is the voluntary testimony.

"The sight of a free and informed nation giving genuine approval to its first citizen through its representatives, no matter how new and fascinating it may be, shines with an authenticity (an authenticity that chance or excitement could not create, and that flattery would dull) that comes from the outstanding qualities it willingly acknowledges."

"May you long enjoy that liberty which is so dear to you, and to which your name will ever be so dear; may your own virtue and a nation's prayers obtain the happiest sunshine for the decline of your days, and the choicest of future blessings. For our country's sake; for the sake of republican liberty, it is our earnest wish that your example may be the guide of your successors; and thus, after being the ornament and safeguard of the present age, become the patrimony of our descendants."

"May you continue to enjoy the freedom that means so much to you, and to which your name will always be precious; may your own goodness and the prayers of a nation bring you the brightest days in the latter part of your life, along with the best blessings for the future. For the sake of our country; for the sake of democratic liberty, we sincerely hope that your example will guide those who come after you; and in doing so, after being a symbol and protector of this time, become a legacy for our future generations."

In support of this motion, after urging the indelicacy of exulting over the misfortunes of others by contrasting our happiness with their misery, Mr. Giles said, that with respect to the wisdom[48] and firmness of the President, he differed in opinion from the answer; and though he might be singular, yet it being his opinion, he should not be afraid to avow it. He had not that grateful conviction there mentioned, and if he were to come there and express it, he should prove an inconsistent character. He should not go into a lengthy discussion on this point, but if they turned their eyes to our foreign relations, there would be found no reason to exult in the wisdom and firmness of the administration. He believed, on the contrary, that it was from a want of wisdom and firmness that we were brought into our present critical situation. If gentlemen had been satisfied with expressing their esteem of the patriotism and virtue of the President, they might have got a unanimous vote; but they could not suppose that gentlemen would so far forget self-respect as to join in the proposed adulation.

In support of this motion, after stressing the bad taste of rejoicing over the misfortunes of others by comparing our happiness to their misery, Mr. Giles said he disagreed with the statement regarding the wisdom and firmness of the President. Although he might be the only one with this opinion, he would not hesitate to express it. He did not share the grateful conviction mentioned and felt that if he were to express it, he would appear inconsistent. He wouldn’t go into a lengthy discussion on this point, but if they looked at our foreign relations, they would see no reason to be proud of the administration's wisdom and firmness. On the contrary, he believed it was the lack of wisdom and firmness that caused our current critical situation. If the gentlemen had been content to express their respect for the President’s patriotism and virtue, they might have received a unanimous vote; however, they could not expect others to overlook their self-respect and join in the suggested praise.

Mr. Giles said he was one of those citizens who did not regret the President's retiring from office. He hoped he would retire to his country seat and enjoy all the happiness he could wish; and he believed he would enjoy more there than in his present situation. He believed the government of the United States would go on without him. The people were competent to their own government. What calamities would attend the United States if one man alone was essential to their government! He believed there were a thousand men in the United States who were capable of filling the presidential chair as well as it had been filled heretofore. And although a clamour had been raised in all parts of the United States, more or less, from apprehensions on the departure of the President from office, yet, not feeling these apprehensions himself, he was perfectly easy on the occasion. He wished the President as much happiness as any man; and hoping he would retire, he could not express any regrets at the event. And it would be extraordinary, if gentlemen whose names in the yeas and nays are found in opposition to certain prominent measures of the administration, should now come forward and approve those measures. This could not be expected. He, for his part, retained the same opinions he had always done with respect to those measures, nor should any influence under heaven prevent him from expressing that opinion—an opinion in which he was confident, ere long, all America would concur.[49]

Mr. Giles said he was one of those citizens who didn’t regret the President stepping down. He hoped he would go to his country home and enjoy all the happiness he could wish for, believing he would be happier there than in his current position. He thought the government of the United States would continue just fine without him. The people were capable of governing themselves. What disasters would befall the United States if one person was essential to its government? He believed there were thousands of people in the United States who could fill the presidential office just as well as it had been filled before. And although there was a lot of noise coming from various parts of the United States due to concerns about the President leaving office, he didn’t share those concerns and felt completely at ease about it. He wished the President as much happiness as anyone and, while hoping for his retirement, he felt no regrets about it. It would be surprising if gentlemen whose names appeared in opposition to certain key measures of the administration now came forward to support those measures. That couldn't be expected. He, for his part, held the same views he always had regarding those measures, and no influence on Earth would stop him from expressing that opinion—an opinion he was confident all of America would eventually share.[49]

This motion was opposed with great earnestness by the party which had supported the administration. The advantages which had resulted from the constitution were said to be too obvious to be controverted; and it was maintained that a comparison of the present situation of the United States with its condition anterior to the adoption of that instrument, or with the condition of foreign powers, was natural and proper. This comparison was made not for the purposes of exultation, but of exciting just sentiments respecting their own conduct.

This motion was strongly opposed by the party that had supported the administration. The benefits that had come from the constitution were said to be too clear to dispute; and it was argued that comparing the current state of the United States with its situation before adopting that document, or with the conditions of other countries, was both natural and appropriate. This comparison wasn't meant to boast, but to inspire fair reflections about their own actions.

In reply to the observations respecting the President, it was said, that the whole course of his administration had demonstrated the correctness with which the terms "wisdom and firmness" were applied to it. Particular circumstances were stated in which these qualities had been pre-eminently displayed; but the general impression which facts had made on the public mind was considered as dispensing with the necessity of stating the particular facts themselves.

In response to the comments about the President, it was stated that the entire duration of his administration had shown just how accurate the descriptors "wisdom and firmness" were for it. Specific situations were mentioned where these qualities had been notably exhibited; however, the overall impression that these facts had created in the public's mind was seen as eliminating the need to outline the specific facts themselves.

It might be true, they said, that there were many others who could fill with propriety and advantage the presidential chair, but no man could fill it who possessed, in an equal degree, the confidence of the people. The possession of this confidence enabled the chief magistrate to perform the duties of his office in a manner greatly conducive to the interests of the nation, and the loss of so valuable a public servant was certainly just cause of regret. With this sentiment, the feelings of the community fully accorded. In every part of the United States, the declarations of their constituents attested the regrets with which this event was contemplated by them. Those gentlemen who did not participate in these feelings would have an opportunity to record their names with their opinions. But those who did participate in them ought not to be restrained from expressing them.

They might be right, they said, that there were many others who could competently and beneficially take on the presidency, but no one could do so while earning, to the same extent, the people’s trust. Having this trust allowed the president to carry out the responsibilities of the office in a way that greatly benefited the nation, and losing such a valuable public servant was definitely a reason for regret. The community shared this sentiment completely. Across the United States, the opinions of their constituents showed the sorrow they felt over this event. Those individuals who didn’t share these feelings would have the chance to make their views known. However, those who did share them shouldn’t be held back from expressing their thoughts.

The motion to strike out was lost; after which the words "the spectacle of a whole nation, the freest and most enlightened in the world," were amended, so as to read, "the spectacle of a free and enlightened nation," and the answer was carried by a great majority.

The motion to remove was defeated; after that, the phrase "the spectacle of a whole nation, the freest and most enlightened in the world," was changed to read, "the spectacle of a free and enlightened nation," and the response was approved by a large majority.

1797

Early in the session, the President communicated to congress in a special message, the complaints alleged by the representative of the French republic against the government of the United States. These complaints embracing most of the transactions of the legislative and executive departments, in relation to the belligerent powers, a particular and careful review of almost every act of the administration, which could affect those powers, became indispensable. The principal object for the mission of General Pinckney to Paris, having been to make full and fair explanations of the principles and conduct of the American government, this review was addressed to that minister. It presented a minute and comprehensive detail of all the points of controversy which had arisen between the two nations; and defended the measures which had been adopted in America, with a clearness, and a strength of argument, believed to be irresistible. To place the subject in a point of view, admitting of no possible misunderstanding, the secretary of state had annexed to his own full and demonstrative reasoning, documents, establishing the real fact in each particular case, and the correspondence relating to it.

Early in the session, the President sent a special message to Congress about the complaints made by the representative of the French Republic against the government of the United States. These complaints covered most of the actions taken by the legislative and executive branches related to the warring powers. A detailed review of almost every action of the administration that could impact those powers became necessary. The main goal of General Pinckney's mission to Paris was to provide clear and fair explanations of the principles and actions of the American government, so this review was directed to that minister. It included a detailed and comprehensive account of all the disputes that had emerged between the two nations and defended the measures taken in America with clarity and strong arguments believed to be unbeatable. To eliminate any possibility of misunderstanding, the Secretary of State included, alongside his thorough and convincing reasoning, documents that established the true facts in each case and the relevant correspondence.

This letter, with its accompanying documents, was laid before congress.

This letter, along with its supporting documents, was presented to Congress.

Those who read these valuable papers will not be surprised, that the President should have relied upon their efficacy in removing from the government of France, all impressions unfavourable to the fairness of intention which had influenced the conduct of the United States; and in effacing from the bosoms of the great body of the American people, all those unjust and injurious suspicions which had been entertained against their own administration. Should their immediate operation on the executive of France disappoint his hopes, he persuaded himself that he could not mistake their influence in America; and he felt the most entire conviction that the accusations against the United States would cease, with the evidence that those accusations were countenanced and supported by a great portion of the American people.

Those who read these important documents won’t be surprised that the President relied on their effectiveness in clearing away any negative perceptions about the intentions of the United States that had affected the government of France. He aimed to erase the unjust and harmful suspicions held by many Americans against their own administration. Even if their immediate impact on the French leadership didn't meet his expectations, he believed he couldn't be wrong about their influence in America. He was completely convinced that the accusations against the United States would fade once it became clear that those accusations were supported by a significant part of the American populace.

These documents were communicated to the public; but, unfortunately, their effect at home was not such as had been expected, and they were consequently inoperative abroad. The fury of political controversy seemed to sustain no diminution; and the American character continued to be degraded by reciprocal criminations, which the two great parties made upon each other, of being under a British, and a French influence.

These documents were shared with the public; however, their impact at home was not what had been hoped for, and they ended up having no effect abroad. The intensity of political debate showed no signs of lessening; and the American reputation continued to suffer due to the blame exchanged between the two major parties, accusing each other of being influenced by British and French interests.

The measures particularly recommended by the President in his speech, at the opening of the session, were not adopted; and neither the debates in Congress, nor the party publications with which the nation continued to be agitated, furnished reasonable ground for the hope, that the political intemperance which had prevailed from the establishment of the republican form of government in France, was about to be succeeded by a more conciliatory spirit.

The measures specifically suggested by the President during his opening speech were not adopted; and neither the debates in Congress nor the party publications that kept the nation stirred up provided any reasonable hope that the political extremism that had existed since the establishment of the republican government in France was about to be replaced by a more conciliatory attitude.

The President contemplated with a degree of pleasure[50] seldom felt at the resignation of power, his approaching retirement to the delightful scenes of domestic and rural life.

The President thought with a sense of satisfaction[50] rarely experienced at stepping down from power, as he looked forward to a peaceful life filled with family and nature.

It was impossible to be absolutely insensible to the bitter invectives, and malignant calumnies of which he had long been the object. Yet in one instance only, did he depart from the rule he had prescribed for his conduct regarding them. Apprehending permanent injury from the republication of certain spurious letters which have been already noticed, he, on the day which terminated his official character, addressed to the secretary of state the following letter.

It was impossible to completely ignore the harsh insults and false accusations he had been facing for a long time. However, he only broke the rule he had set for himself in dealing with them on one occasion. Fearing lasting damage from the reprinting of certain fake letters that had already been mentioned, he wrote the following letter to the secretary of state on the day his official role came to an end.

He denies the authenticity of certain spurious letters published as his in 1776.

"Dear Sir,

"Dear Sir,"

"At the conclusion of my public employments, I have thought it expedient to notice the publication of certain forged letters which first appeared in the year 1777, and were obtruded upon the public as mine. They are said by the editor to have been found in a small portmanteau that I had left in the care of my mulatto servant named Billy, who, it is pretended, was taken prisoner at Fort Lee, in 1776. The period when these letters were first printed will be recollected, and what were the impressions they were intended to produce on the public mind. It was then supposed to be of some consequence to strike at the integrity of the motives of the American Commander-in-chief, and to paint his inclinations as at variance with his professions and his duty—another crisis in the affairs of America having occurred, the same weapon has been resorted to, to wound my character and deceive the people.

"At the end of my public service, I felt it necessary to address the publication of certain forged letters that first appeared in 1777, which were presented to the public as if they were mine. The editor claims they were discovered in a small suitcase that I had left with my mixed-race servant named Billy, who supposedly was captured at Fort Lee in 1776. The time when these letters were first published will be remembered, along with the impressions they were meant to create in the public's mind. It was believed to be important to undermine the integrity of the motives of the American Commander-in-chief, portraying his intentions as inconsistent with his claims and responsibilities—now, at another critical moment in America's history, the same tactic has been used to harm my reputation and mislead the public."

"The letters in question have the dates, addresses, and signatures here following:

"The letters in question include the dates, addresses, and signatures listed below:

New York, June 12th, 1776.

New York, June 12, 1776.

To Mr. Lund Washington, at Mount Vernon, Fairfax county, Virginia.

To Mr. Lund Washington, at Mount Vernon, Fairfax County, Virginia.

G.W.

G.W.

June 18th, 1776.

June 18, 1776.

To John Parke Custis, Esqr., at the Hon Benedict Calvert's Esqr., Mount Airy, Maryland.

To John Parke Custis, Esq., at the Hon. Benedict Calvert's Esq., Mount Airy, Maryland.

G.W.

G.W.

New York, July 8th, 1776.

New York, July 8, 1776.

To Mr. Lund Washington, Mount Vernon, Fairfax county, Virginia.

To Mr. Lund Washington, Mount Vernon, Fairfax County, Virginia.

G.W.

G.W.

New York, July 16th, 1776.

New York, July 16, 1776.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

G.W.

G.W.

New York, July 15th, 1776.

New York, July 15, 1776.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

G.W.

G.W.

New York, July 22d, 1776.

New York, July 22, 1776.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

To Mr. Lund Washington.

G.W.

G.W.

June 24th, 1776.

June 24, 1776.

To Mrs. Washington.

To Ms. Washington.

G.W.

G. W.

"At the time when these letters first appeared, it was notorious to the army immediately under my command, and particularly to the gentlemen attached to my person, that my mulatto man Billy had never been one moment in the power of the enemy. It is also a fact that no part of my baggage, or any of my attendants, were captured during the whole course of the war. These well known facts made it unnecessary, during the war, to call the public attention to the forgery by any express declaration of mine; and a firm reliance on my fellow citizens, and the abundant proofs they gave of their confidence in me, rendered it alike unnecessary to take any formal notice of the revival of the imposition, during my civil administration. But as I can not know how soon a more serious event may succeed to that which will this day take place, I have thought it a duty that I owed to myself, to my country, and to truth, now to detail the circumstances above recited, and to add my solemn declaration that the letters herein described are a base forgery, and that I never saw or heard of them until they appeared in print. The present letter I commit to your care, and desire it may be deposited in the office of the department of state, as a testimony of the truth to the present generation and to posterity. Accept, &c. &c."

"At the time these letters first came out, it was widely known among the army I commanded, especially my close associates, that my mulatto servant Billy was never under enemy control for even a moment. It's also a fact that none of my luggage or any of my staff were captured throughout the entire war. These well-known facts made it unnecessary during the war for me to draw public attention to the forgery with any formal statement. My strong trust in my fellow citizens, and the ample proof they showed of their confidence in me, made it equally unnecessary to formally address the revival of this deception during my time in civil office. However, since I cannot predict when a more serious situation might arise following today’s events, I feel it is my duty to myself, my country, and the truth to share the details I mentioned above and to firmly declare that the letters described here are a malicious forgery, and I never saw or heard of them until they were published. I am sending this letter to you and request that it be filed in the Department of State as a record of truth for both this generation and future ones. Accept, etc., etc."

John Adams elected president, and Thomas Jefferson vice president.

In February, the votes for the first and second magistrates of the union were opened and counted in presence of both houses; and the highest number appearing in favour of Mr. Adams, and the second in favour of Mr. Jefferson, the first was declared to be the President, and the second the Vice President, of the United States, for four years to commence on the fourth day of the ensuing March.

In February, the votes for the first and second leaders of the union were opened and counted in front of both houses; since Mr. Adams received the most votes and Mr. Jefferson received the second highest, Mr. Adams was declared the President and Mr. Jefferson the Vice President of the United States, for a term of four years starting on the fourth day of the following March.

On that day, the members of the senate, conducted by the Vice President, together with the officers of the general and state governments, and an immense concourse of citizens, convened in the hall of the house of representatives, in which the oaths were administered to the President.

On that day, the senators, led by the Vice President, along with the officials from the federal and state governments, and a huge crowd of citizens, gathered in the hall of the House of Representatives, where the oaths were taken by the President.

The sensibility which was manifested when General Washington entered, did not surpass the cheerfulness which overspread his own countenance, nor the heartfelt pleasure with which he saw another invested with the powers that had so long been exercised by himself.[51]

The feeling that emerged when General Washington entered was no greater than the happiness that lit up his face or the genuine joy he felt seeing someone else take on the responsibilities he had held for so long.[51]

General Washington retires to Mount Vernon.

After the solemnities of the occasion had been concluded, and he had paid to his successor those respectful compliments which he believed to be equally due to the man and to the office, he hastened[52] to that real felicity which awaited him at Mount Vernon, the enjoyment of which he had long impatiently anticipated.

After the formalities of the event were over, and he had given his successor the respectful acknowledgments he thought were deserved by both the person and the position, he quickly[52] made his way to the true happiness that awaited him at Mount Vernon, a pleasure he had eagerly anticipated for a long time.

The same marks of respect and affection for his person, which had on all great occasions been manifested by his fellow citizens, still attended him. His endeavours to render his journey private were unavailing; and the gentlemen of the country through which he passed, were still ambitious of testifying their sentiments for the man who had, from the birth of the republic, been deemed the first of American citizens. Long after his retirement, he continued to receive addresses from legislative bodies, and various classes of citizens, expressive of the high sense entertained of his services.

The same respect and affection for him that his fellow citizens had shown on all significant occasions still surrounded him. His attempts to keep his journey private were unsuccessful, and the gentlemen in the areas he passed through were eager to express their feelings for the man who had been considered the foremost American citizen since the founding of the republic. Even long after his retirement, he continued to receive messages from legislative bodies and different groups of citizens, expressing their deep appreciation for his services.

Notwithstanding the extraordinary popularity of the first President of the United States, scarcely has any important act of his administration escaped the most bitter invective.

Notwithstanding the remarkable popularity of the first President of the United States, hardly any significant action of his administration has avoided fierce criticism.

Political situation of the United States at this period.

On the real wisdom of the system which he pursued, every reader will decide for himself. Time will, in some measure, dissipate the prejudices and passions of the moment, and enable us to view objects through a medium which represents them truly.

On the actual wisdom of the system he followed, each reader will make up their own mind. Over time, some of the biases and emotions of the moment will fade, allowing us to see things through a lens that accurately reflects them.

Without taking a full review of measures which were reprobated by one party and applauded by the other, the reader may be requested to glance his eye at the situation of the United States in 1797, and to contrast it with their condition in 1788.

Without a complete review of the measures that one side criticized and the other side praised, the reader may be asked to look at the situation of the United States in 1797 and compare it to their condition in 1788.

At home, a sound credit had been created; an immense floating debt had been funded in a manner perfectly satisfactory to the creditors: an ample revenue had been provided; those difficulties which a system of internal taxation, on its first introduction, is doomed to encounter, were completely removed; and the authority of the government was firmly established. Funds for the gradual payment of the debt had been provided; a considerable part of it had been actually discharged; and that system which is now operating its entire extinction, had been matured and adopted. The agricultural and commercial wealth of the nation had increased beyond all former example. The numerous tribes of warlike Indians, inhabiting those immense tracts which lie between the then cultivated country and the Mississippi, had been taught, by arms and by justice, to respect the United States, and to continue in peace. This desirable object having been accomplished, that humane system was established for civilizing, and furnishing them with the conveniences of life which improves their condition, while it secures their attachment.

At home, a solid credit was established; a massive floating debt was handled in a way that satisfied the creditors: a sufficient revenue was generated; the challenges that an internal taxation system typically faces during its initial rollout were completely resolved; and the government’s authority was firmly established. Funds were set aside for the gradual repayment of the debt; a significant portion had already been paid off; and the plan now in place to eliminate the debt entirely had been developed and put into action. The nation’s agricultural and commercial wealth grew beyond any previous records. The various tribes of warrior Indians living in the vast areas between the then-cultivated land and the Mississippi were taught, through military action and fairness, to respect the United States and to maintain peace. With this goal achieved, a compassionate system was put in place to civilize them and provide them with the necessities of life, thereby improving their situation while ensuring their loyalty.

Abroad, the differences with Spain had been accommodated; and the free navigation of the Mississippi had been acquired, with the use of New Orleans as a place of deposit for three years, and afterwards, until some other equivalent place should be designated. Those causes of mutual exasperation which had threatened to involve the United States in a war with the greatest maritime and commercial power in the world, had been removed; and the military posts which had been occupied within their territory, from their existence as a nation, had been evacuated. Treaties had been formed with Algiers and with Tripoli, and no captures appear to have been made by Tunis; so that the Mediterranean was opened to American vessels.

Abroad, the issues with Spain had been resolved; the right to freely navigate the Mississippi River had been secured, along with the use of New Orleans as a storage point for three years, and then, until another equivalent location was designated. The sources of mutual frustration that had threatened to drag the United States into a conflict with the world's leading maritime and commercial power had been eliminated; and the military outposts that had been established within their territory since becoming a nation had been abandoned. Treaties had been established with Algiers and Tripoli, and no ships seem to have been captured by Tunis; thus, the Mediterranean was now open to American vessels.

This bright prospect was indeed, in part, shaded by the discontents of France. Those who have attended to the particular points of difference between the two nations, will assign the causes to which these discontents are to be ascribed, and will judge whether it was in the power of the President to have avoided them, without surrendering the real independence of the nation, and the most invaluable of all rights —the right of self-government.

This promising outlook was definitely, in part, overshadowed by the frustrations in France. Those who have focused on the specific differences between the two countries will identify the reasons behind these frustrations and will consider whether the President could have avoided them without compromising the true independence of the nation and the most valuable right of all—the right to self-govern.

Such was the situation of the United States at the close of Washington's administration. Their circumstances at its commencement will be recollected; and the contrast is too striking not to be observed.

Such was the situation of the United States at the end of Washington's administration. Their circumstances at the beginning will be remembered, and the contrast is too noticeable not to be mentioned.

That this beneficial change in the affairs of America is to be ascribed exclusively to the wisdom which guided the national councils will not be pretended. That many of the causes which produced it originated with the government, and that their successful operation was facilitated, if not secured, by the system which was adopted, will scarcely be denied. To estimate that system correctly, their real influence must be allowed to those strong prejudices, and turbulent passions, with which it was assailed.

That this positive change in America's situation can be attributed solely to the wisdom that guided the national decisions is not something anyone would claim. It's undeniable that many of the factors that brought this about started with the government, and that their successful functioning was aided, if not guaranteed, by the system that was chosen. To accurately assess that system, we must consider the strong biases and intense emotions it faced.

Accustomed in the early part of his life to agricultural pursuits, and possessing a real taste for them, General Washington was particularly well qualified to enjoy, in retirement, that tranquil felicity which he had anticipated. Resuming former habits, and returning to ancient and well known employments, he was familiar with his new situation, and therefore exempt from the danger of that disappointment which is the common lot of those who, in old age, retire from the toils of business, or the cares of office, to the untried pleasures of the country. A large estate, which exhibited many proofs of having been long deprived of the attentions of its proprietor, in the management and improvement of which he engaged with ardour, an extensive correspondence, and the society of men and books, gave employment to every hour which was equally innocent and interesting, and furnished ground for the hope that the evening of a life which had been devoted to the public service, would be as serene, as its mid-day had been brilliant.

Used to farming early in his life and genuinely enjoying it, General Washington was especially well-suited to appreciate the peaceful happiness he had been looking forward to in retirement. By picking up old habits and returning to familiar activities, he was comfortable in his new circumstances, and thus protected from the disappointment that often comes to those who, in their later years, leave the demands of work or public duties for the unfamiliar joys of country life. A large estate, which clearly showed signs of being neglected by its owner for some time, became the focus of his enthusiasm for management and improvement. He maintained an extensive correspondence and surrounded himself with engaging people and books, filling his every hour with activities that were both innocent and interesting. This brought him hope that the final chapter of a life spent in public service would be as peaceful as the midday of that life had been bright.

Though devoted to these occupations, an absolute indifference to public affairs would have been incompatible with that love of country which had influenced all his conduct. Feeling strong impressions in favour of that system, with regard to foreign powers, which had been adopted by himself, and which was faithfully pursued by his successor, he could not be inattentive to the immense, and continued exertions, made by a powerful party to overturn it. Yet for a time, he sought to abstract himself from these political contests, and to diminish the interest which his feelings impelled him to take in them. His letters abound in paragraphs not unlike the following. "I have confidence however in that Providence which has shielded the United States from the evils that have hitherto threatened them; and, as I believe the major part of the people of this country to be well affected to its constitution and government, I rest satisfied that, should a crisis ever arise to call forth the sense of the community, it will be strong in support of the honour and dignity of the nation. Therefore, however much I regret the opposition which has for its object the embarrassment of the administration, I shall view things in the 'calm light of mild philosophy,' and endeavour to finish my course in retirement and ease."

Though dedicated to these pursuits, total indifference to public affairs would have been at odds with the love of his country that influenced all his actions. Strongly supporting the foreign policy he had adopted and his successor had maintained, he couldn't ignore the immense and ongoing efforts by a powerful group to overturn it. Yet for a while, he tried to distance himself from these political battles and lessen the interest his feelings compelled him to have in them. His letters are filled with paragraphs similar to the following: "I have faith in the Providence that has protected the United States from the dangers that have threatened them so far; and, since I believe that most of the people in this country are loyal to its constitution and government, I am confident that, should a crisis arise that requires community action, it will be strongly in support of the nation's honor and dignity. So, no matter how much I regret the opposition aimed at undermining the administration, I will look at things with the 'calm light of mild philosophy,' and work to finish my journey in peace and comfort."

But the designs of France were soon manifested in a form which, to the veteran soldier and statesman of Mount Vernon, appeared to be too dangerous as well as unequivocal, to admit the preservation of this equanimity.

But France's plans soon showed themselves in a way that seemed too risky and clear-cut for the experienced soldier and statesman of Mount Vernon to remain calm.

The French government refuses to receive General Pinckney as minister.

In the executive of that republic, General Pinckney encountered dispositions of a very different character from that amicable and conciliatory temper which had dictated his mission. After inspecting his letter of credence, the Directory announced to him their haughty determination "not to receive another minister plenipotentiary from the United States, until after the redress of grievances demanded of the American government, which the French republic had a right to expect from it." This message was succeeded, first by indecorous verbal communications, calculated to force the American minister out of France, and afterwards, by a written mandate to quit the territories of the republic.

In the leadership of that republic, General Pinckney faced attitudes that were completely different from the friendly and conciliatory spirit that guided his mission. After reviewing his credentials, the Directory formally declared their arrogant decision "not to accept another ambassador from the United States until the grievances demanded of the American government, which the French republic had every right to expect, were addressed." This message was followed, initially, by disrespectful verbal exchanges meant to push the American minister out of France, and eventually by a written order for him to leave the territory of the republic.

This act of hostility was accompanied with another which would explain the motives for this conduct, if previous measures had not rendered all further explanation unnecessary.

This act of aggression was accompanied by another that would clarify the motives for this behavior, if earlier actions hadn't made any further explanation unnecessary.

On giving to the recalled minister his audience of leave, the president of the directory addressed a speech to him, in which terms of outrage to the government, were mingled with expressions of affection for the people of the United States; and the expectation of ruling the former, by their influence over the latter, was too clearly manifested not to be understood. To complete this system of hostility, American vessels were captured wherever found; and, under the pretext of their wanting a document, with which the treaty of commerce had been uniformly understood to dispense, they were condemned as prize.

When sending off the recalled minister, the president of the directory gave a speech, which mixed insults toward the government with feelings of fondness for the people of the United States. The intention to control the former through their influence over the latter was evident. To further this agenda of hostility, American ships were seized wherever they were found; and under the claim that they lacked a document that had always been assumed to be unnecessary under the trade treaty, they were declared as prizes.

Congress is convened.
President's speech.

This serious state of things demanded a solemn consideration. On receiving from General Pinckney the despatches which communicated it, the President issued his proclamation requiring congress to meet on the 15th day of June. The firm and dignified speech delivered by the chief magistrate at the commencement of the session, exhibited that sensibility which a high minded and real American might be expected to feel, while representing to the national legislature the great and unprovoked outrages of a foreign government. Adverting to the audience of leave given by the executive Directory to Colonel Monroe, he said, "the speech of the President discloses sentiments more alarming than the refusal of a minister, because more dangerous to our independence and union; and, at the same time, studiously marked with indignities towards the government of the United States. It evinces a disposition to separate the people from their government; to persuade them that they have different affections, principles, and interests from those of their fellow citizens whom they themselves have chosen to manage their common concerns; and thus to produce divisions fatal to our peace. Such attempts ought to be repelled with a decision which shall convince France, and the world, that we are not a degraded people, humiliated under a colonial spirit of fear, and sense of inferiority, fitted to be the miserable instruments of foreign influence, and regardless of national honour, character, and interest."

This serious situation required careful thought. After receiving the messages from General Pinckney that detailed it, the President issued a proclamation calling Congress to meet on June 15th. The strong and dignified speech given by the President at the start of the session showed the sensitivity that a principled and true American would be expected to have while informing the national legislature about the significant and unwarranted attacks from a foreign government. Referring to the exit granted by the executive Directory to Colonel Monroe, he stated, "the President's speech reveals ideas that are more alarming than the refusal of a minister because they pose a greater threat to our independence and unity; and, at the same time, are deliberately marked by disrespect towards the government of the United States. It demonstrates an intention to divide the people from their government; to convince them that their feelings, principles, and interests differ from those of their fellow citizens whom they chose to handle their common issues; and thus to create divisions that could be devastating to our peace. Such efforts must be countered decisively to show France and the world that we are not a diminished people, humiliated by a colonial mindset of fear and feelings of inferiority, fit only to be the pathetic tools of foreign influence, and indifferent to our national honor, character, and interests."

"Retaining still the desire which had uniformly been manifested by the American government to preserve peace and friendship with all nations, and believing that neither the honour nor the interest of the United States absolutely forbade the repetition of advances for securing these desirable objects with France, he should," he said, "institute a fresh attempt at negotiation, and should not fail to promote and accelerate an accommodation on terms compatible with the rights, duties, interests, and honour of the nation." But while he should be making these endeavours to adjust all differences with the French republic by amicable negotiation, he earnestly recommended it to congress to provide effectual measures of defence.

"Still holding on to the desire that the American government has consistently shown to maintain peace and friendship with all nations, and believing that neither the honor nor the interests of the United States absolutely prevented making new efforts to achieve these goals with France, he stated that he would initiate a new attempt at negotiation and would not hesitate to encourage and expedite an agreement on terms that align with the rights, duties, interests, and honor of the nation. However, while he would be making these efforts to resolve all differences with the French republic through friendly negotiation, he strongly urged Congress to implement effective defensive measures."

Three envoys extraordinary deputed to negotiate with France.

To carry into effect the pacific dispositions avowed in the speech, three envoys extraordinary were appointed, at the head of whom General Pinckney was placed. Their instructions conformed to the public language of the President. Peace and reconciliation were to be pursued by all means, compatible with the honour and the faith of the United States; but no national engagements were to be impaired; no innovation to be permitted upon those internal regulations for the preservation of peace which had been deliberately and uprightly established; nor were the rights of the government to be surrendered.

To implement the peaceful intentions stated in the speech, three special envoys were appointed, led by General Pinckney. Their instructions aligned with the President's public statements. They were to seek peace and reconciliation by all means that respected the honor and integrity of the United States; however, no national commitments were to be compromised, no changes were to be allowed to the internal rules set up to maintain peace, and the government's rights were not to be given up.

The debates in the house of representatives, on the answer to the speech, were long and earnest. To expressions approving the conduct of the executive with regard to foreign nations, the opposition was ardent, but unsuccessful. On the third of June, an answer was agreed to which contained sentiments worthy of an American legislature, and for which several of the leaders of the opposition voted.

The discussions in the House of Representatives about the response to the speech were lengthy and serious. The opposition was passionate but ultimately unsuccessful in challenging the approval of the executive's actions regarding foreign nations. On June 3rd, a response was agreed upon that included views fitting for an American legislature, and several leaders of the opposition voted in favor of it.

The speech of the President was well adapted to the occasion, and to the times. It was calculated to rouse those indignant feelings which a high spirited people, insulted and injured by a foreign power, can never fail to display, if their judgment be not blinded, or their sensibility to external wrongs blunted, by invincible prejudices. He relied principally on the manifestation of these feelings for the success of the negotiation; and on their real existence, for the defence of the national rights, should negotiation fail. His endeavours were not absolutely unsuccessful. Some impression was made on the mass of the people; but it was too slight to be productive of the advantages expected from it. The conduct of France was still openly defended; and the opinion, that the measures which had been adopted by the executive of the United States furnished that republic with just cause of war, was still publicly maintained, and indefatigably circulated. According to these opinions, America could entitle herself to peace, only by retracing the steps she had taken, and yielding to the demands of her justly offended but generous and magnanimous ally.

The President's speech was well-suited for the occasion and the times. It was designed to awaken the strong emotions of a proud people who, when insulted and harmed by a foreign power, can't help but show their outrage—unless their judgment is clouded or their sensitivity to external wrongs is dulled by deep-seated biases. He mainly relied on expressing these feelings for the success of the negotiations and on their genuine existence to defend national rights if negotiations failed. His efforts were not entirely unsuccessful. He did make some impact on the general public, but it was too weak to bring about the hoped-for benefits. France's actions were still openly defended, and the belief that the steps taken by the U.S. government provided that country with just cause for war continued to be publicly upheld and tirelessly spread. According to this view, America could only claim peace by reversing its actions and yielding to the demands of its justly offended but generous and noble ally.

Still jealous for the honour, as well as confident of the importance, of his country, and retaining that full conviction respecting the propriety of its measures which had induced their adoption, General Washington could not repress the solicitude with which he contemplated passing events. His confidential letters disclose the strong feelings of his own bosom, but betray no apprehensions that the French government would press its present system to extremities. He firmly believed that the hostile attitude it had assumed was to be, exclusively, ascribed to the conduct of those Americans who had been the uniform advocates of all the pretensions of France, and who were said to be supported by a real majority of the people; and confidently expected that, under the old pretext of magnanimous forbearance, the executive directory would, slowly, and gradually, recede from its present system, so soon as the error in which it originated should become manifest. The opinion he had always entertained of the good sense and patriotism of his fellow citizens, silenced every doubt respecting the manner in which they would act, when their real situation should be perceived by themselves.

Still concerned about the honor and importance of his country, and holding onto his strong belief in the appropriateness of its actions that led to their adoption, General Washington couldn't hide the worry with which he observed recent events. His private letters reveal his deep feelings but show no fear that the French government would push its current policies to an extreme. He strongly believed that the aggressive stance taken by France was mainly due to the behavior of those Americans who had consistently supported all of France's claims and who were thought to be backed by a true majority of the people. He confidently anticipated that, under the old excuse of noble restraint, the executive directory would gradually back away from its current policies once the mistake that led to them became clear. The opinion he always held about the good judgment and patriotism of his fellow citizens silenced any doubts about how they would behave once they recognized their true situation.

1798

For a considerable length of time, no certain intelligence reached the United States respecting the negotiation at Paris. At length, in the winter of 1798, letters were received from the American envoys, indicating an unfavourable state of things; and, in the spring, despatches arrived which announced the total failure of the mission.

For quite a while, no reliable news reached the United States about the negotiations in Paris. Finally, in the winter of 1798, letters came in from the American envoys, showing that things were not going well; and in the spring, reports came in that announced the complete failure of the mission.

History will scarcely furnish the example of a nation, not absolutely degraded, which has received from a foreign power such open contumely, and undisguised insult, as were, on this occasion, suffered by the United States in the persons of their ministers.

History will hardly provide an example of a nation, not completely degraded, that has faced such open disrespect and blatant insults from a foreign power as the United States did in this instance, through the actions directed at their ministers.

Their treatment.

It was insinuated that their being taken from the party[53] which had supported the measures of their own government furnished just cause of umbrage; and, under slight pretexts, the executive directory delayed to accredit them as the representatives of an independent nation. In this situation, they were assailed by persons, not indeed invested with formal authority, but exhibiting sufficient evidence of the source from which their powers were derived, who, in direct and explicit terms, demanded money from the United States as the condition which must precede, not only the reconciliation of America to France, but any negotiation on the differences between the two countries.

It was suggested that their removal from the party[53] that had supported their own government's actions gave them a valid reason to feel upset; and, with minimal justification, the executive directory postponed recognizing them as representatives of an independent nation. In this situation, they were approached by individuals who, while not officially in charge, clearly showed the origin of their authority, and who explicitly demanded money from the United States as a prerequisite for not only reconciling America with France, but also any discussions regarding the issues between the two countries.

That an advance of money by a neutral to a belligerent power would be an obvious departure from neutrality, though an insuperable objection to this demand, did not constitute the most operative reason for repelling it. Such were the circumstances under which it was made, that it could not be acceded to without a surrender of the real independence of the United States; nor without being, in fact, the commencement of a system, the end of which it was impossible to foresee.

That lending money by a neutral party to a warring nation would clearly violate neutrality, although a major reason to reject this request, was not the only compelling reason to turn it down. The situation in which the request was made was such that agreeing to it would mean giving up the true independence of the United States; it would also effectively mark the beginning of a system with an uncertain outcome.

 

Mount Vernon

Mount Vernon

This colonial mansion overlooking the Potomac River fifteen miles south of Washington, D.C., and famous as the home and burial-place of the "Father of His Country," was built in 1743 by Washington's elder brother, Lawrence, who called it Mount Vernon, after Admiral Vernon, under whom he had served in the British Navy. Mount Vernon, which was much enlarged by President Washington, was by him bequeathed to Bushrod Washington, upon whose death it came into the hands of John A. Washington, his nephew, who sold it in 1858 to the Ladies Mount Vernon Association, which holds it in trust as a national shrine.

This colonial mansion overlooking the Potomac River fifteen miles south of Washington, D.C., and known as the home and burial site of the "Father of His Country," was built in 1743 by Washington's older brother, Lawrence, who named it Mount Vernon after Admiral Vernon, under whom he had served in the British Navy. Mount Vernon, which was greatly expanded by President Washington, was left to Bushrod Washington, and after his death, it passed to his nephew, John A. Washington, who sold it in 1858 to the Ladies Mount Vernon Association, which maintains it as a national shrine.

 

A decided negative was therefore given to the preliminary required by these unofficial agents; but they returned to the charge with wonderful perseverance, and used unwearied arts to work upon the fears of the American ministers for their country, and for themselves. The immense power of France was painted in glowing colours, the humiliation of the house of Austria was stated, and the conquest of Britain was confidently anticipated. In the friendship of France alone, it was said, could America look for safety; and the fate of Venice was held up to warn her of the danger which awaited those who incurred the displeasure of the great republic. The ministers were assured that, if they believed their conduct would be approved in the United States, they were mistaken. The means which the Directory possessed, in that country, to excite odium against them, were great, and would unquestionably be employed.

A definite no was given to the proposal put forward by these unofficial agents; however, they persevered and persistently tried to appeal to the fears of the American ministers for their country and for themselves. The immense power of France was described in vivid terms, the humiliation of Austria was emphasized, and the conquest of Britain was confidently expected. It was claimed that America could only find safety in the friendship of France, and the fate of Venice was used as a warning about the dangers facing those who displeased the great republic. The ministers were told that if they thought their actions would be approved in the United States, they were mistaken. The means the Directory had to stir up negative sentiments against them in that country were significant, and they would undoubtedly be used.

This degrading intercourse was at length interrupted by the positive refusal of the envoys to hold any further communication with the persons employed in it.

This degrading interaction was finally interrupted by the firm refusal of the envoys to continue any further communication with the people involved in it.

Meanwhile, they urged the object of their mission with persevering but unavailing solicitude. The Directory still refused to acknowledge them in their public character; and the secretary of exterior relations, at unofficial visits which they made him, renewed the demand which his agents had unsuccessfully pressed.

Meanwhile, they urged the person they were tasked with trying to reach out to, though their efforts were persistent yet unsuccessful. The Directory continued to ignore them in their official capacity; and during the unofficial visits they made to him, the secretary of external relations repeated the request that his agents had also pressed without success.

Finding the objections to their reception in their official character insurmountable, the American ministers made a last effort to execute the duties assigned to them. In a letter addressed to the secretary of exterior relations, they entered at large into the explanations committed to them by their government, and illustrated, by a variety of facts, the uniform friendliness of its conduct to France.[54] Notwithstanding the failure of this effort, and their perfect conviction that all further attempts would be equally unavailing, they continued, with a passiveness which must search for its apology in their solicitude to demonstrate to the American people the real views of the French republic, to employ the only means in their power to avert the rupture which was threatened, and which appeared to be inevitable.

Finding the objections to their official reception impossible to overcome, the American ministers made one last attempt to fulfill their responsibilities. In a letter to the Secretary of Foreign Relations, they elaborated on the explanations their government had assigned to them and provided various examples to illustrate its consistently friendly actions toward France.[54] Despite the failure of this effort and their firm belief that any further attempts would be equally futile, they continued, with a passiveness that could only be justified by their desire to show the American public the true intentions of the French republic, to use all means available to prevent the looming rupture that seemed inevitable.

During these transactions, occasion was repeatedly taken to insult the American government; open war was continued to be waged by the cruisers of France on American commerce; and the flag of the United States was a sufficient justification for the capture and condemnation of any vessel over which it waved.

During these transactions, there were frequent insults directed at the American government; French cruisers continued to wage open war on American commerce; and the United States flag was seen as a valid reason to capture and condemn any vessel it flew over.

At length, when the demonstration became complete, that the resolution of the American envoys was not less fixed, than their conduct had been guarded and temperate, various attempts were made to induce two of them, voluntarily, to relinquish their station; on the failure of which, they were ordered to quit the territories of the republic. As if to aggravate this national insult, the third, who had been selected from that party which was said to be friendly to France, was permitted to remain, and was invited to resume the discussions which had been interrupted.

Finally, when it was clear that the American envoys were as determined as they had been cautious and reasonable in their actions, various attempts were made to persuade two of them to step down from their positions voluntarily. When that didn't work, they were ordered to leave the republic's territory. To add to this national insult, the third envoy, who was from the party believed to be pro-France, was allowed to stay and was invited to continue the discussions that had been put on hold.

The despatches communicating these events were laid before congress, and were afterwards published. The indignation which they excited was warm and extensive. The attempt to degrade the United States into a tributary nation was too obvious to be concealed; and the resentment produced, as well by this attempt as by the threats which accompanied it, was not confined to the federalists. For the moment, a spirit was roused on which an American may reflect with pride, and which he may consider as a sure protection from external danger. In every part of the continent, the favourite sentiment was "millions for defence, not a cent for tribute."

The reports sharing these events were presented to Congress and later published. The outrage they sparked was intense and widespread. The effort to turn the United States into a subordinate nation was too clear to hide, and the anger it caused, along with the threats that came with it, wasn't limited to the Federalists. For that moment, a spirit was awakened that any American can look back on with pride, and which can be seen as a reliable defense against external threats. Across the continent, the popular saying was "millions for defense, not a cent for tribute."

The disposition still existed to justify France, by criminating the American government, by contending that her intentions were not really hostile, that her conduct was misrepresented by men under British influence, who wished for war, or had been deceived by unauthorized intriguers; that, admitting it to be otherwise, she only demanded those marks of friendship which, at a critical moment, she had herself afforded; that the real interests of the United States required a compliance with this demand; that it would cost more money to resist than to yield to it; that the resistance would infallibly be ineffectual; and that national honour was never secured by national defeat. Neither these sentiments, nor the arguments which were founded on them, accorded with the general feeling; and it required the co-operation of other causes to establish the influence of those who urged them.

The mindset still existed to defend France by blaming the American government, arguing that its intentions weren't truly hostile, and that its actions were misrepresented by people under British influence who wanted war or had been misled by unauthorized schemers. They claimed that even if this wasn't the case, France was only asking for the gestures of friendship that she had offered during a critical moment. They argued that the true interests of the United States needed to meet this demand, that resisting it would cost more money than complying, that any resistance would surely fail, and that national honor was never achieved through national defeat. However, these views and the arguments based on them did not align with the general sentiment, and it took the support of other factors to establish the influence of those who promoted them.

Measures of hostility adopted by the American government against France.

In congress, vigorous measures were adopted for retaliating injuries which had been sustained, and for repelling those which were threatened. Amongst these was a regular army. A regiment of artillerists and engineers was added to the permanent establishment; and the President was authorized to raise twelve additional regiments of infantry, and one regiment of cavalry, to serve during the continuance of the existing differences with the French republic if not sooner discharged. He was also authorized to appoint officers for a provisional army, and to receive and organize volunteer corps who would be exempt from ordinary militia duty; but neither the volunteers nor the officers of the provisional army were to receive pay unless called into actual service.

In Congress, strong measures were taken to respond to injuries that had occurred and to defend against those that were being threatened. Among these measures was the establishment of a regular army. A regiment of artillery and engineers was added to the permanent force; the President was given the authority to raise twelve additional infantry regiments and one cavalry regiment to serve for the duration of the ongoing issues with the French Republic, unless they were discharged sooner. He also had the power to appoint officers for a provisional army and to receive and organize volunteer groups, who would be exempt from regular militia duties; however, neither the volunteers nor the officers of the provisional army would be paid unless they were called into active service.

Addresses[55] to the executive from every part of the United States attested the high spirit of the nation, and the answers of the President were well calculated to give it solidity and duration.

Addresses[55] to the executive from all over the United States showed the strong spirit of the nation, and the President's responses were designed to give it stability and longevity.

No sooner had a war become probable, to the perils of which no man could be insensible, than the eyes of all were directed to General Washington, as the person who should command the American army. He alone could be seen at the head of a great military force without exciting jealousy; he alone could draw into public service, and arrange properly the best military talents of the nation; and he more than any other, could induce the utmost exertions of its physical strength.

No sooner did a war seem likely, a danger that no one could ignore, than everyone looked to General Washington as the one who should lead the American army. He was the only one who could be seen at the head of a large military force without causing jealousy; he alone could bring the nation's best military talents into public service and organize them effectively; and more than anyone else, he could motivate the most significant efforts of the country's physical resources.

Indignant at the unprovoked injuries which had been heaped upon his country, and convinced that the conflict, should a war be really prosecuted by France with a view to conquest, would be extremely severe, and could be supported, on the part of America, only by a persevering exertion of all her force, he could not determine, should such a crisis arrive, to withhold those aids which it might be in his power to afford, should public opinion really attach to his services that importance which would render them essential. His own reflections appear to have resulted in a determination not to refuse once more to take the field, provided he could be permitted to secure efficient aid by naming the chief officers of the army, and to remain at home until his service in the field should be required by actual invasion.

Angry about the unprovoked injuries that had been inflicted on his country, and convinced that if France really pursued war with the intent to conquer, it would be incredibly intense, he believed that America could only handle such a conflict through a consistent effort of all its resources. He couldn't decide, if such a crisis came, to withhold any support he could offer if public opinion truly valued his contributions enough to make them necessary. His own thoughts seemed to lead him to a decision not to refuse to engage once more, as long as he could choose the top officers of the army for effective support and remain at home until he was needed on the front lines due to an actual invasion.

A confidential and interesting letter from Colonel Hamilton of the 19th of May, on political subjects, concludes with saying, "You ought also to be aware, my dear sir, that in the event of an open rupture with France, the public voice will again call you to command the armies of your country; and though all who are attached to you will from attachment as well as public considerations, deplore an occasion which should once more tear you from that repose to which you have so good a right; yet it is the opinion of all those with whom I converse that you will be compelled to make the sacrifice. All your past labours may demand, to give them efficacy, this further, this very great sacrifice."

A confidential and interesting letter from Colonel Hamilton dated May 19 discusses political matters and ends with, "You should also know, my dear sir, that if there’s a serious conflict with France, the public will once again call on you to lead the armies of your country. Although everyone who cares about you will mourn the thought of pulling you away from the peace you rightfully deserve, I believe all those I talk to think you'll have no choice but to make this sacrifice. All your previous efforts may require this further, significant sacrifice to be truly effective."

"You may be assured," said General Washington in reply, "that my mind is deeply impressed with the present situation of public affairs, and not a little agitated by the outrageous conduct of France towards the United States, and at the inimitable conduct of those partisans who aid and abet her measures. You may believe further, from assurances equally sincere, that if there was any thing in my power to be done consistently, to avert or lessen the danger of the crisis, it should be rendered with hand and heart.

"You can be sure," General Washington replied, "that I’m really concerned about the current state of public affairs, and I’m quite upset by France's outrageous behavior towards the United States, as well as the behavior of those partisans who support her actions. You can also trust that if there’s anything I can do to prevent or reduce the danger of this crisis, I will do it wholeheartedly."

"But, my dear sir, dark as matters appear at present, and expedient as it is to be prepared for the worst that can happen, (and no man is more disposed to this measure than I am) I can not make up my mind yet, for the expectation of open war; or, in other words, for a formidable invasion by France. I can not believe, although I think her capable of any thing, that she will attempt to do more than she has done. When she perceives the spirit and policy of this country rising into resistance, and that she has falsely calculated upon support from a large part of the people[56] to promote her views and influence in it, she will desist even from those practices, unless unexpected events in Europe, or the acquisition of Louisiana and the Floridas, should induce her to continue them. And I believe further, that although the leaders of their party in this country will not change their sentiments, they will be obliged to change their plan, or the mode of carrying it on. The effervescence which is appearing in all quarters, and the desertion of their followers, will frown them into silence—at least for a while.

"But, my dear sir, even though things seem dark right now, and it’s wise to be ready for the worst that could happen (and no one is more in favor of this than I am), I can't fully accept the idea of open war or a serious invasion from France just yet. I can’t believe, although I think she’s capable of anything, that she will try to do more than she has already done. Once she sees that the spirit and strategy of this country are rising in resistance, and that she has misjudged the support from a large part of the people[56] to further her aims and influence here, she will back off from those actions, unless something unexpected happens in Europe or if she acquires Louisiana and the Floridas, which might drive her to persist. Furthermore, I believe that even though the leaders of their party in this country won’t change their beliefs, they’ll have to adjust their tactics or the way they go about it. The unrest growing in various places and the loss of their supporters will force them into silence—at least for a time."

"If I did not view things in this light, my mind would be infinitely more disquieted than it is: for, if a crisis should arrive when a sense of duty, or a call from my country should become so imperious as to leave me no choice, I should prepare for relinquishment, and go with as much reluctance from my present peaceful abode, as I should go to the tombs of my ancestors."

"If I didn’t see things this way, my mind would be way more troubled than it is right now. If a situation came up where my sense of duty or a call from my country was so overwhelming that I had no choice, I would get ready to let go and leave my current peaceful home with just as much hesitation as I would have going to my ancestors' graves."

The opinion that prudence required preparations for open war, and that General Washington must once more be placed at the head of the American armies, strengthened every day; and on the 22d of June, the President addressed him a letter in which that subject was thus alluded to.

The belief that caution called for preparing for open war, and that General Washington needed to be placed back in charge of the American armies, grew stronger each day; and on June 22, the President sent him a letter that mentioned this topic.

"In forming an army, whenever I must come to that extremity, I am at an immense loss whether to call out the old generals, or to appoint a young set. If the French come here, we must learn to march with a quick step, and to attack, for in that way only they are said to be vulnerable. I must tax you, sometimes, for advice. We must have your name, if you will in any case permit us to use it. There will be more efficacy in it than in many an army."

"In building an army, whenever I reach that critical point, I really struggle with whether to bring back the old generals or to choose a new group of young leaders. If the French come here, we need to learn how to move quickly and attack, because that’s the only way they’re said to be vulnerable. I might need to ask you for advice at times. We need your name, if you’re willing to let us use it. It will have more impact than many armies."

A letter from the secretary of war, written four days afterwards, concludes with asking, "May we flatter ourselves that, in a crisis so awful and important, you will accept the command of all our armies? I hope you will, because you alone can unite all hearts and all hands, if it is possible that they can be united."

A letter from the Secretary of War, written four days later, ends with the question, "Can we hope that, in such a terrible and significant crisis, you will take command of all our armies? I really hope you will, because only you can bring everyone together, if there’s any chance they can be united."

These letters reached General Washington on the same day. The following extract from his reply to the President will exhibit the course of his reflections relative to his appearance once more at the head of the American armies.

These letters got to General Washington on the same day. The following excerpt from his response to the President will show the path of his thoughts about returning to lead the American armies again.

"At the epoch of my retirement, an invasion of these states by any European power, or even the probability of such an event in my days, was so far from being contemplated by me, that I had no conception either that or any other occurrence would arise in so short a period which could turn my eyes from the shades of Mount Vernon. But this seems to be the age of wonders. And it is reserved for intoxicated and lawless France (for purposes of Providence far beyond the reach of human ken) to slaughter her own citizens, and to disturb the repose of all the world besides. From a view of the past,—from the prospect of the present,—and of that which seems to be expected, it is not easy for me to decide satisfactorily on the part it might best become me to act. In case of actual invasion by a formidable force, I certainly should not intrench myself under the cover of age and retirement, if my services should be required by my country to assist in repelling it. And if there be good cause to expect such an event, which certainly must be better known to the government than to private citizens, delay in preparing for it may be dangerous, improper, and not to be justified by prudence. The uncertainty however of the latter, in my mind, creates my embarrassment; for I can not bring it to believe, regardless as the French are of treaties, and of the laws of nations, and capable as I conceive them to be of any species of despotism and injustice, that they will attempt to invade this country after such a uniform and unequivocal expression of the determination of the people in all parts to oppose them with their lives and fortunes. That they have been led to believe by their agents and partisans among us that we are a divided people, that the latter are opposed to their own government, and that the show of a small force would occasion a revolt, I have no doubt; and how far these men (grown desperate) will further attempt to deceive, and may succeed in keeping up the deception, is problematical. Without that, the folly of the Directory in such an attempt would, I conceive, be more conspicuous, if possible, than their wickedness.

"At the time of my retirement, the idea of any European power invading these states, or even the possibility of such an event occurring during my lifetime, was so far from my thoughts that I couldn't imagine any situation arising in such a short period that would pull my attention away from the peace of Mount Vernon. But this seems to be an era of wonders. It's left to the reckless and chaotic France (for reasons of Providence that are far beyond human understanding) to harm its own citizens and disturb the peace of the entire world. Looking at the past, considering the present, and what seems to be expected, I find it hard to decide the best course of action for me. If an actual invasion by a strong force occurred, I certainly wouldn't hide behind my age and retirement if my country needed my help to fend it off. And if there's good reason to expect such an event, which the government surely knows better than ordinary citizens, delaying preparations could be dangerous, unwise, and can't be justified as prudent. However, the uncertainty of this situation troubles me; I cannot believe, no matter how disregarded the French are of treaties and the laws of nations, and how capable I think they are of any form of tyranny and injustice, that they would try to invade this country after such a clear and consistent expression by the people everywhere to resist them with their lives and resources. I have no doubt that they have been misled by their agents and supporters among us into thinking we are a divided people and that some are opposed to their own government, believing that a show of a small force would spark a rebellion. How far these desperate individuals will continue to deceive and whether they can maintain the illusion is uncertain. Without that, I believe the foolishness of the Directory in attempting such an invasion would be even more evident, if possible, than their evil intentions."

"Having with candour made this disclosure of the state of my mind, it remains only for me to add, that to those who knew me best, it is best known that, should imperious circumstances induce me to exchange once more the smooth paths of retirement for the thorny ways of public life, at a period too when repose is more congenial to nature, it would be productive of sensations which can be more easily conceived than expressed."

"Having honestly shared my thoughts, I just want to add that those who know me best are aware that if strong circumstances push me to leave the peaceful life of solitude for the challenging roads of public life, especially at a time when rest feels more natural, it would bring about feelings that are easier to imagine than to articulate."

His letter to the secretary of war was more detailed and more explicit. "It can not," he said, "be necessary for me to promise to you or to others who know my sentiments, that to quit the tranquillity of retirement, and enter the boundless field of responsibility, would be productive of sensations which a better pen than I possess would find it difficult to describe. Nevertheless, the principle by which my conduct has been actuated through life, would not surfer me, in any great emergency, to withhold any services I could render when required by my country;—especially in a case where its dearest rights are assailed by lawless ambition and intoxicated power, in contempt of every principle of justice, and in violation of solemn compact, and of laws which govern all civilized nations:—and this too with the obvious intent to sow thick the seeds of disunion for the purpose of subjugating our government, and destroying our independence and happiness.

His letter to the Secretary of War was more detailed and direct. "It shouldn’t be necessary for me to promise you or anyone who knows my feelings that leaving the peace of retirement to step into the vast arena of responsibility would bring sensations that someone with better writing skills than I have would struggle to describe. However, the principle that has guided my actions throughout my life would not allow me, in a significant emergency, to withhold any services I could provide when my country needs them—especially in a situation where its most cherished rights are threatened by reckless ambition and unchecked power, disregarding every principle of justice and violating solemn agreements and laws that all civilized nations adhere to—especially with the clear intention to plant the seeds of disunity to ultimately control our government and undermine our independence and happiness."

"Under circumstances like these, accompanied by an actual invasion of our territory, it would be difficult for me, at any time, to remain an idle spectator, under the plea of age or retirement. With sorrow, it is true, I should quit the shades of my peaceful abode, and the ease and happiness I now enjoy, to encounter anew the turmoils of war, to which, possibly, my strength and powers might be found incompetent. These, however, should not be stumbling blocks in my own way. But there are other things highly important for me to ascertain and settle before I could give a definite answer to your question.

"Given these circumstances, especially with an actual invasion of our territory, it would be hard for me to just sit back and do nothing, using my age or retirement as an excuse. It would be with sadness that I would leave the comfort of my peaceful home and the ease and happiness I currently have, to face the chaos of war again, which, perhaps, my strength and abilities might not be enough for. However, those shouldn’t be barriers for me. But there are other important things I need to figure out and clarify before I can give you a definite answer to your question."

1st. The propriety in the opinion of the public, so far as that opinion has been expressed in conversation, of my appearing again on the public theatre, after declaring the sentiments I did in my valedictory address of September, 1796.

1st. The public's opinion, as expressed in conversation, about my returning to the public theater after the statements I made in my farewell address in September 1796.

2dly. A conviction in my own breast, from the best information that can be obtained, that it is the wish of my country that its military force should be committed to my charge; and,

2dly. I strongly believe, based on the best information available, that my country wants its military forces to be under my command; and,

3dly. That the army now to be formed should be so appointed as to afford a well grounded hope of its doing honour to the country, and credit to him who commands it in the field.

3rdly. That the army being formed should be organized in a way that gives a solid hope of bringing honor to the country and credit to the one who leads it in battle.

"On each of these heads you must allow me to make observations."

"On each of these points, I’d like to share my thoughts."

General Washington then proceeded to detail his sentiments on those points on which his consent to take command of the army must depend.

General Washington then went on to explain his thoughts on the points that would determine his agreement to take command of the army.

General Washington appointed commander-in-chief of the American Army.

Some casual circumstances delayed the reception of the letters of the President and secretary of war for several days, in consequence of which, before the answer of General Washington reached the seat of government, the President had nominated him to the chief command of all the armies raised or to be raised in the United States, with the rank of Lieutenant General; and the senate had unanimously advised and consented to his appointment.

Some casual events delayed the arrival of the letters from the President and the Secretary of War for several days. As a result, before General Washington’s response reached the government, the President had nominated him for the top command of all the armies raised or to be raised in the United States, with the rank of Lieutenant General; and the Senate had unanimously supported and agreed to his appointment.

By the secretary of war, who was directed to wait upon him with his commission, the President addressed to him the following letter:

By the Secretary of War, who was instructed to present him with his commission, the President sent him the following letter:

"Mr. M'Henry, the secretary of war, will have the honour to wait on you in my behalf, to impart to you a step I have ventured to take, which I should have been happy to have communicated in person, had such a journey, at this time, been in my power.

"Mr. M'Henry, the Secretary of War, will have the honor of meeting with you on my behalf to share an action I have taken, which I would have preferred to communicate in person if I were able to make that journey right now."

"My reasons for this measure will be too well known to need any explanation to the public. Every friend and every enemy of America will comprehend them at first blush. To you, sir, I owe all the apology I can make. The urgent necessity I am in of your advice and assistance, indeed of your conduct and direction of the war, is all I can urge; and that is a sufficient justification to myself and to the world. I hope it will be so considered by yourself. Mr. M'Henry will have the honour to consult you upon the organization of the army, and upon every thing relating to it."

"My reasons for this decision are well known and don't need any explanation to the public. Every friend and every enemy of America will understand them right away. To you, sir, I offer the best apology I can. The urgent need I have for your advice and assistance, truly for your leadership in the war, is all I can present; and that is enough justification for myself and for the world. I hope you will see it that way as well. Mr. M'Henry will have the honor of consulting you on the organization of the army and everything related to it."

Open instructions, signed by the President, were on the same day delivered to the secretary of war, of which the following is a copy:

Open instructions, signed by the President, were delivered to the Secretary of War on the same day, and here is a copy of them:

"It is my desire that you embrace the first opportunity to set out on your journey to Mount Vernon, and wait on General Washington with the commission of Lieutenant General and Commander-in-chief of the armies of the United States, which, by the advice and consent of the senate, has been signed by me.

"It is my hope that you take the first chance to head to Mount Vernon and meet with General Washington regarding his appointment as Lieutenant General and Commander-in-Chief of the armies of the United States, which has been signed by me with the advice and consent of the Senate."

"The reasons and motives which prevailed on me to venture on such a step as the nomination of this great and illustrious character, whose voluntary resignation alone occasioned my introduction to the office I now hold, were too numerous to be detailed in this letter, and are too obvious and important to escape the observation of any part of America or Europe. But as it is a movement of great delicacy, it will require all your address to communicate the subject in a manner that shall be inoffensive to his feelings, and consistent with all the respect that is due from me to him.

"The reasons and motivations that led me to nominate this great and distinguished person, whose voluntary resignation was the only reason I came to hold the office I have now, are too many to explain in this letter and too clear and significant to be overlooked by anyone in America or Europe. However, since this is a very sensitive issue, you'll need to handle it carefully to present the topic in a way that won't hurt his feelings and that shows the respect I owe him."

"If the General should decline the appointment, all the world will be silent, and respectfully acquiesce. If he should accept it, all the world, except the enemies of his country, will rejoice. If he should come to no decisive determination, but take the subject into consideration, I shall not appoint any other lieutenant general until his conclusion is known.

"If the General decides not to take the position, everyone will be quiet and respectfully go along with it. If he accepts, everyone except his country's enemies will celebrate. If he doesn't make a clear decision and just thinks about it, I won't appoint anyone else as lieutenant general until we know what he decides."

"His advice in the formation of a list of officers would be extremely desirable to me. The names of Lincoln, Morgan, Knox, Hamilton, Gates, Pinckney, Lee, Carrington, Hand, Muhlenberg, Dayton, Burr, Brooks, Cobb, Smith, as well as the present Commander-in-chief, may be mentioned to him, and any others that occur to you. Particularly, I wish to have his opinion on the men most suitable for inspector general, adjutant general, and quarter master general.

"His input on gathering a list of officers would be really helpful for me. The names of Lincoln, Morgan, Knox, Hamilton, Gates, Pinckney, Lee, Carrington, Hand, Muhlenberg, Dayton, Burr, Brooks, Cobb, Smith, along with the current Commander-in-chief, can be brought up with him, as well as any others you think of. Specifically, I’d like to get his thoughts on the best candidates for inspector general, adjutant general, and quartermaster general."

"His opinion on all subjects would have great weight, and I wish you to obtain from him as much of his reflections upon the times and the service as you can."

"His views on all topics carry significant influence, and I want you to gather as many of his thoughts on current events and the work as possible."

The communications between General Washington and the secretary of war appear to have been full and unreserved. The impressions of the former respecting the critical and perilous situation of his country had previously determined him to yield to the general desire, and accept the commission offered him, provided he could be permitted to select for the high departments of the army, and especially for the military staff, those in whom he could place the greatest confidence. Being assured that there was every reason to believe his wishes in this respect would not be thwarted, he gave to the secretary the arrangement[57] which he would recommend for the principal stations in the army; and, on the 13th of July, addressed the following letter to the President.

The communications between General Washington and the Secretary of War were open and direct. Washington's strong feelings about the urgent and dangerous situation his country faced had already led him to agree to the widespread request to accept the offered command, as long as he could choose individuals he trusted for the key roles in the army, especially for the military staff. Once he was assured that his preferences in this matter would be respected, he provided the Secretary with the list[57] he would recommend for the main positions in the army; and, on July 13th, he sent the following letter to the President.

"I had the honour, on the evening of the 11th instant, to receive from the hands of the secretary at war, your favour of the seventh, announcing that you had, with the advice and consent of the senate, appointed me Lieutenant General and Commander-in-chief of the armies raised or to be raised for the service of the United States.

"I had the honor, on the evening of the 11th, to receive from the Secretary of War your letter from the 7th, informing me that you, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appointed me Lieutenant General and Commander-in-Chief of the armies raised or to be raised for the service of the United States."

"I can not express how greatly affected I am at this new proof of public confidence, and at the highly flattering manner in which you have been pleased to make the communication. At the same time, I must not conceal from you my earnest wish that the choice had fallen upon a man less declined in years, and better qualified to encounter the usual vicissitudes of war.

"I can't express how much this new show of public confidence affects me, and how flattering the way you delivered the news is. At the same time, I have to be honest with you about my strong wish that the choice had been made for someone younger and better suited to face the usual challenges of war."

"You know, sir, what calculations I had made relative to the probable course of events on my retiring from office, and the determination, with which I had consoled myself, of closing the remnant of my days in my present peaceful abode. You will therefore be at no loss to conceive and appreciate the sensations I must have experienced, to bring my mind to any conclusion that would pledge me, at so late a period of life, to leave scenes I sincerely love, to enter upon the boundless field of public action, incessant trouble, and high responsibility.

"You know, sir, what plans I had made regarding what would happen after I left office, and how I had convinced myself to enjoy the rest of my days in my current peaceful home. So, you can understand the feelings I must have had when trying to decide to commit, at this late stage of my life, to leave the places I truly love to step into the vast arena of public life, endless challenges, and significant responsibilities."

"It was not possible for me to remain ignorant of, or indifferent to recent transactions. The conduct of the Directory of France towards our country; their insidious hostility to its government; their various practices to withdraw the affections of the people from it; the evident tendency of their arts, and those of their agents, to countenance and invigorate opposition; their disregard of solemn treaties and the laws of nations; their war upon our defenceless commerce; their treatment of our ministers of peace; and their demands, amounting to tribute, could not fail to excite in me sentiments corresponding with those my countrymen have so generally expressed in their affectionate addresses to you.

I couldn't stay unaware of or uninterested in recent events. The actions of the French Directory towards our country; their sneaky hostility towards our government; their various attempts to sway the public away from it; the clear aim of their schemes, and those of their agents, to support and strengthen opposition; their disregard for solemn treaties and international laws; their attacks on our defenseless trade; their treatment of our peace ministers; and their demands that amount to tribute, all stirred feelings in me that align with what my fellow citizens have expressed in their loving messages to you.

"Believe me, sir, no man can more cordially approve the wise and prudent measures of your administration. They ought to inspire universal confidence, and will no doubt, combined with the state of things, call from congress such laws and means as will enable you to meet the full force and extent of the crisis.

"Believe me, sir, no one can more wholeheartedly approve of the smart and careful actions of your administration. They should inspire widespread confidence, and will certainly, along with the current situation, prompt Congress to enact the laws and provide the resources that will allow you to handle the full force and scope of the crisis."

"Satisfied, therefore, that you have sincerely wished and endeavoured to avert war, and exhausted to the last drop the cup of reconciliation, we can, with pure hearts, appeal to heaven for the justice of our cause, and may confidently trust the final result to that kind Providence who has heretofore, and so often, signally favoured the people of the United States.

"Satisfied, then, that you have genuinely wanted and tried to prevent war, and have made every effort for peace, we can, with clear conscience, appeal to heaven for the justice of our cause, and confidently leave the outcome to that benevolent Providence who has, time and again, favorably guided the people of the United States."

"Thinking in this manner, and feeling how incumbent it is upon every person of every description to contribute, at all times, to his country's welfare, and especially in a moment like the present, when every thing we hold dear and sacred is so seriously threatened, I have finally determined to accept the commission of Commander-in-chief of the armies of the United States, with the reserve only,—that I shall not be called into the field until the army is in a situation to require my presence, or it becomes indispensable by the urgency of circumstances.

"With this in mind, and recognizing how important it is for everyone, no matter who they are, to contribute to their country's well-being—especially in times like these when everything we cherish is under serious threat—I have finally decided to accept the position of Commander-in-Chief of the armies of the United States, with the understanding that I will not be deployed until the army really needs me or it's absolutely necessary due to urgent circumstances."

"In making this reservation, I beg it to be understood that I do not mean to withhold any assistance to arrange and organize the army, which you may think I can afford. I take the liberty also to mention that I must decline having my acceptance considered as drawing after it any immediate charge upon the public, or that I can receive any emoluments annexed to the appointment before I am in a situation to incur expense."

"In making this reservation, I want to make it clear that I don't intend to withhold any help in arranging and organizing the army, which you might think I can provide. I also want to say that I must refuse to have my acceptance seen as creating any immediate obligation on the public, or that I can accept any compensation related to the appointment before I am in a position to incur expenses."

From this period, General Washington intermingled the cares and attentions of office with his agricultural pursuits. His solicitude respecting the organization of an army which he might possibly be required to lead against an enemy the most formidable in the world, was too strong to admit of his being inattentive to its arrangements. Yet he never did believe that an invasion of the United States would actually take place. His conviction that it was not the interest of France to wage an unprovoked war with America, and that the hostile measures which the executive Directory had adopted originated in the opinion that those measures would overthrow the administration, and place power in the hands of those who had uniformly supported all the pretensions of the French republic, remained unshaken. As a necessary consequence of this conviction, he was persuaded that the indignation which this system had excited, would effect its change. The only circumstance that weakened this hope, arose from the persevering opposition which was still maintained in congress, and from the evidence which was daily afforded that those party animosities, to which he ascribed the present dangerous crisis, were far from being healed. Those who had embraced the cause of France in the controversy between that nation and the United States, had been overwhelmed by a flood of testimony which silenced them for a time, but which weakened them more in appearance than in reality. They were visibly recovering both strength and confidence. It is not therefore wonderful that General Washington should have expressed himself more freely than had been his custom, respecting American parties, and that he should have exerted an influence which he had not been in the habit of employing, to induce men whose talents he respected, but who had declined political life, to enter into the national and state legislatures.

During this time, General Washington balanced the responsibilities of his job with his farming activities. He was deeply concerned about organizing an army that he might need to lead against one of the most powerful enemies in the world, which kept him attentive to its preparations. Yet, he never believed that the United States would actually be invaded. He was convinced that it wasn't in France's interest to provoke a war with America, and he thought that the aggressive actions taken by the executive Directory were based on the idea that these measures would topple the current administration and give power to those who consistently supported the French republic's claims. This belief remained strong for him. Consequently, he was hopeful that the anger these policies had stirred would lead to their change. The only thing that dampened this hope was the ongoing opposition in Congress and the daily evidence that the party divisions he blamed for the current crisis were far from resolved. Those who supported France during its conflict with the United States had been overwhelmed by a wave of evidence that silenced them temporarily but made them appear weaker than they really were. They were visibly regaining both strength and confidence. Therefore, it’s not surprising that General Washington began to speak more openly than usual about American political factions and that he used influence he typically avoided to encourage capable individuals, who had previously shunned political life, to take roles in the national and state legislatures.

Events soon demonstrated that he had not calculated unreasonably on the effects of the spirit manifested by his country. Although America, supplicating for peace, had been spurned with contempt; although the executive Directory had rejected with insult her repeated and sincere prayers to be permitted to make explanations, and had haughtily demanded a concession of their arrogant and unfounded claims or the advance of pecuniary aids, as a preliminary to negotiation;—America, in arms, was treated with some respect. Indirect pacific overtures were made, and a willingness on the part of France, to accommodate the existing differences on reasonable terms, was communicated.

Events soon showed that he had accurately assessed the impact of the attitude displayed by his country. Even though America, begging for peace, had been dismissed with disdain; even though the executive Directory had insultingly rejected her repeated and genuine requests to be allowed to explain, and had arrogantly demanded a concession of their baseless claims or financial support as a condition for negotiation;—America, with its military might, was treated with some respect. Indirect peace offers were made, and it was communicated that France was willing to resolve the existing differences on reasonable terms.

1799

The President, truly solicitous to restore that harmony and good understanding which the United States had laboured so incessantly and so sincerely to preserve with their ancient ally, caught at the overtures which were indirectly made, and again appointed three envoys extraordinary and ministers plenipotentiary to the French republic. These gentlemen found the government in the hands of a person who had taken no part in those transactions which had embroiled the two countries, and who entered into negotiations with them which terminated in the amicable adjustment of differences.

The President, genuinely concerned about restoring the harmony and good understanding that the United States had worked so hard and sincerely to maintain with their long-time ally, seized the indirect offers made and once again appointed three special envoys and ministers plenipotentiary to the French republic. These envoys discovered that the government was led by someone who had not been involved in the events that had caused the conflict between the two nations, and who engaged in negotiations that ended in a friendly resolution of their differences.

General Washington did not live to witness the restoration of peace.

General Washington did not live to see the peace restored.

His death.

On Friday the 13th of December, while attending to some improvements upon his estate, he was exposed to a light rain, by which his neck and hair became wet. Not apprehending danger from this circumstance, he passed the afternoon in his usual manner; but, in the night, was seized with an inflammatory affection of the windpipe. The disease commenced with a violent ague, accompanied with some pain in the upper and fore part of the throat, a sense of stricture in the same part, a cough, and a difficult rather than a painful deglutition, which were soon succeeded by fever, and a quick and laborious respiration.

On Friday, December 13th, while working on some improvements to his property, he got caught in a light rain that soaked his neck and hair. Not thinking much of it, he spent the afternoon as usual. However, that night he developed an inflammation of his windpipe. The illness started with a severe chill, along with pain in the front of his throat, a feeling of tightness in that area, a cough, and difficulty swallowing, which quickly led to a fever and rapid, labored breathing.

Believing bloodletting to be necessary, he procured a bleeder who took from his arm twelve or fourteen ounces of blood, but he would not permit a messenger to be despatched for his family physician until the appearance of day. About eleven in the morning Doctor Craik arrived; and perceiving the extreme danger of the case, requested that two consulting physicians should be immediately sent for. The utmost exertions of medical skill were applied in vain. The powers of life were manifestly yielding to the force of the disorder; speaking, which was painful from the beginning, became almost impracticable: respiration became more and more contracted and imperfect, until half past eleven on Saturday night; when, retaining the full possession of his intellect, he expired without a struggle.

Believing that bloodletting was necessary, he had a bleeder take twelve or fourteen ounces of blood from his arm, but he wouldn't allow anyone to send for his family doctor until morning. Around eleven in the morning, Doctor Craik arrived; seeing the extreme danger of the situation, he requested that two consulting physicians be called immediately. All efforts of medical skill were ineffective. The forces of life were clearly giving way to the illness; speaking, which had been painful from the start, became nearly impossible: his breathing grew more and more shallow and irregular until half past eleven on Saturday night, when, fully aware and alert, he passed away without a struggle.

Believing at the commencement of his complaint, as well as through every succeeding stage of it, that its conclusion would be mortal, he submitted to the exertions made for his recovery, rather as a duty, than from any expectation of their efficacy. Some hours before his death, after repeated efforts to be understood, he succeeded in expressing a desire that he might be permitted to die without interruption. After it became impossible to get any thing down his throat, he undressed himself and went to bed, there to die. To his friend and physician, Doctor Craik, who sat on his bed, and took his head in his lap, he said with difficulty, "Doctor, I am dying, and have been dying for a long time, but I am not afraid to die."

Believing from the start of his illness, and throughout every stage of it, that its end would be fatal, he went along with the efforts made for his recovery more out of obligation than any hope of their effectiveness. A few hours before he passed away, after trying several times to communicate, he managed to express a wish to be allowed to die without interruption. Once it became impossible for him to swallow anything, he took off his clothes and got into bed, ready to die. To his friend and doctor, Dr. Craik, who sat beside him and cradled his head in his lap, he said with great effort, "Doctor, I am dying, and I have been for a long time, but I’m not afraid to die."

During the short period of his illness he economized his time, in arranging with the utmost serenity those few concerns which required his attention; and anticipated his approaching dissolution with every demonstration of that equanimity, for which his life was so uniformly, and singularly, conspicuous.

During the brief time he was ill, he made the most of his time by calmly sorting out the few matters that needed his attention; he faced his impending death with all the calmness that was so consistent and unique in his life.

The deep and wide spreading grief occasioned by this melancholy event, assembled a great concourse of people for the purpose of paying the last tribute of respect to the first of Americans. His body, attended by military honours and the ceremonies of religion, was deposited in the family vault at Mount Vernon, on Wednesday, the 18th of December.

The profound and widespread grief caused by this tragic event brought together a large crowd of people to pay their final respects to the first of Americans. His body, accompanied by military honors and religious ceremonies, was laid to rest in the family vault at Mount Vernon on Wednesday, December 18th.

So short was his illness that, at the seat of government, the intelligence of his death preceded that of his indisposition. It was first communicated by a passenger in the stage to an acquaintance whom he met in the street, and the report quickly reached the house of representatives which was then in session. The utmost dismay and affliction was displayed for a few minutes; after which a member stated in his place, the melancholy information which had been received. This information he said was not certain, but there was too much reason to believe it true.

So brief was his illness that, at the government seat, the news of his death arrived before they even heard about his sickness. A passenger on the stagecoach shared the news with a friend he ran into on the street, and it quickly spread to the House of Representatives, which was in session at the time. For a few moments, there was intense shock and sorrow. Then, one member addressed the assembly, sharing the sad news they had received. He mentioned that while the information wasn't confirmed, there was too much reason to think it was true.

"After receiving intelligence," he added, "of a national calamity so heavy and afflicting, the house of representatives can be but ill fitted for public business." He therefore moved an adjournment. Both houses adjourned until the next day.

"After getting news," he added, "of such a serious and distressing national disaster, the House of Representatives can hardly function effectively." He then proposed to adjourn. Both houses agreed to adjourn until the next day.

On the succeeding day, as soon as the orders were read, the same member addressed the chair in the following terms:

On the next day, as soon as the orders were read, the same member spoke to the chair in these words:

"The melancholy event which was yesterday announced with doubt, has been rendered but too certain. Our Washington is no more! the hero, the patriot, and the sage of America;—the man on whom, in times of danger, every eye was turned, and all hopes were placed,—lives now only in his own great actions, and in the hearts of an affectionate and afflicted people.

"The sad news that was announced yesterday with uncertainty has now been confirmed. Our Washington State is gone! The hero, the patriot, and the wise leader of America—the man who was the focus of everyone’s gaze and all hopes during times of danger—now lives only through his remarkable deeds and in the hearts of a loving and grieving people."

"If, sir, it had even not been usual openly to testify respect for the memory of those whom heaven has selected as its instruments for dispensing good to man, yet, such has been the uncommon worth, and such the extraordinary incidents which have marked the life of him whose loss we all deplore, that the whole American nation, impelled by the same feelings, would call, with one voice, for a public manifestation of that sorrow which is so deep and so universal.

"If, sir, even if it wasn't common to openly show respect for those whom heaven has chosen as its instruments for doing good for humanity, the exceptional worth and extraordinary events that have defined the life of the person we all mourn are such that the entire American nation, driven by the same emotions, would call out together for a public display of the deep and widespread sorrow we all feel."

"More than any other individual, and as much as to one individual was possible, has he contributed to found this our wide spreading empire, and to give to the western world independence and freedom.

"More than anyone else, and as much as it was possible for one person, he has helped establish our expansive empire and grant independence and freedom to the western world."

"Having effected the great object for which he was placed at the head of our armies, we have seen him convert the sword into the ploughshare, and sink the soldier into the citizen.

"Having achieved the important goal for which he was appointed to lead our armies, we have seen him turn the sword into a plow and transform the soldier into a citizen."

"When the debility of our federal system had become manifest, and the bonds which connected this vast continent were dissolving, we have seen him the chief of those patriots who formed for us a constitution which, by preserving the union, will, I trust, substantiate and perpetuate those blessings which our revolution had promised to bestow.

"When the weaknesses of our federal system became clear, and the ties that held this vast continent together were weakening, we saw him as the leader among those patriots who created a constitution for us that, by maintaining the union, will, I hope, secure and carry on the blessings that our revolution promised to provide."

"In obedience to the general voice of his country calling him to preside over a great people, we have seen him once more quit the retirement he loved, and, in a season more stormy and tempestuous than war itself, with calm and wise determination, pursue the true interests of the nation, and contribute, more than any other could contribute, to the establishment of that system of policy, which will, I trust, yet preserve our peace, our honour, and our independence.

"In response to his country's call for him to lead a great people, we have once again witnessed him leave the peaceful life he cherished. During a time more chaotic and tumultuous than war, he has, with calm and wise resolve, worked towards the true interests of the nation and contributed more than anyone else could to establishing a policy system that, I hope, will still safeguard our peace, our honor, and our independence."

"Having been twice unanimously chosen the chief magistrate of a free people, we have seen him, at a time when his re-election with universal suffrage could not be doubted, afford to the world a rare instance of moderation, by withdrawing from his high station to the peaceful walks of private life.

"After being chosen twice as the leader of a free people, we have witnessed him, at a moment when no one doubted he would be re-elected by popular vote, demonstrate a rare example of moderation by stepping down from his prestigious position to return to a quiet private life."

"However the public confidence may change, and the public affections fluctuate with respect to others, with respect to him, they have, in war and in peace, in public and in private life, been as steady as his own firm mind, and as constant as his own exalted virtues.

"Regardless of how public opinion might shift, and how people's feelings toward others may vary, their loyalty to him, in both war and peace, in public and private life, has remained as unwavering as his own strong will and as steadfast as his own noble virtues."

"Let us then, Mr. Speaker, pay the last tribute of respect and affection to our departed friend. Let the grand council of the nation display those sentiments which the nation feels. For this purpose I hold in my hand some resolutions which I take the liberty of offering to the house."

"Let's then, Mr. Speaker, pay our final respects and show our affection for our departed friend. Let the national assembly express the feelings that the country embodies. To this end, I have some resolutions in my hand that I’d like to present to the house."

The resolutions,[58] after a preamble stating the death of General Washington, were in the following terms.

The resolutions,[58] following a statement about the death of General Washington, were expressed in these terms.

"Resolved, that this house will wait on the President in condolence of this mournful event.

"Resolved, that this house will visit the President to express our condolences for this sad event."

"Resolved, that the speaker's chair be shrouded with black, and that the members and officers of the house wear black during the session.

"Resolved, that the speaker's chair be covered in black, and that the members and officers of the house wear black during the session."

"Resolved, that a committee, in conjunction with one from the senate, be appointed to consider on the most suitable manner of paying honour to the memory of the Man, first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his fellow citizens."

"Resolved, that a committee, along with one from the Senate, be formed to discuss the best way to honor the memory of the Man, who was first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his fellow citizens."

Immediately after the passage of these resolutions, a written message was received from the President, accompanying a letter from Mr. Lear, which he said, "will inform you that it had pleased Divine Providence to remove from this life our excellent fellow citizen, George Washington, by the purity of his life, and a long series of services to his country, rendered illustrious through the world. It remains for an affectionate and grateful people, in whose hearts he can never die, to pay suitable honour to his memory."

Immediately after these resolutions were passed, we received a written message from the President, along with a letter from Mr. Lear, which stated, "It has pleased Divine Providence to take from this life our outstanding fellow citizen, George Washington, whose pure life and long history of service to his country have made him famous around the world. It is up to a loving and grateful people, in whose hearts he will never be forgotten, to honor his memory appropriately."

To the speaker and members of the house of representatives who waited on him in pursuance of the resolution which has been mentioned, he expressed the same deep-felt and affectionate respect "for the most illustrious and beloved personage America had ever produced."

To the speaker and members of the House of Representatives who visited him as part of the mentioned resolution, he expressed the same deep and heartfelt respect "for the most distinguished and beloved figure America has ever produced."

The senate, on this melancholy occasion, addressed to the President the following letter:

The Senate, on this sad occasion, sent the following letter to the President:

"The senate of the United States respectfully take leave, sir, to express to you their deep regret for the loss their country sustains in the death of General George Washington.

"The Senate of the United States respectfully takes leave, sir, to express their deep regret for the loss our country experiences in the death of General George Washington.

"This event, so distressing to all our fellow citizens, must be peculiarly heavy to you who have long been associated with him in deeds of patriotism. Permit us, sir, to mingle our tears with yours. On this occasion it is manly to weep. To lose such a man, at such a crisis, is no common calamity to the world. Our country mourns a father. The Almighty disposer of human events has taken from us our greatest benefactor and ornament. It becomes us to submit with reverence, to Him who 'maketh darkness his pavilion.'

"This event, so upsetting to all our fellow citizens, must be especially hard for you who have been closely associated with him in acts of patriotism. Allow us, sir, to share in your sorrow. In times like this, it's okay to cry. Losing such a man at such a critical moment is no ordinary tragedy for the world. Our country grieves for a father. The Almighty ruler of human affairs has taken from us our greatest supporter and treasure. We must accept this with respect, to Him who 'makes darkness his shelter.'"

"With patriotic pride we review the life of our Washington, and compare him with those of other countries who have been pre-eminent in fame. Ancient and modern names are diminished before him. Greatness and guilt have too often been allied; but his fame is whiter than it is brilliant. The destroyers of nations stood abashed at the majesty of his virtues. It reproved the intemperance of their ambition, and darkened the splendour of victory. The scene is closed,—and we are no longer anxious lest misfortune should sully his glory; he has traveled on to the end of his journey, and carried with him an increasing weight of honour: he has deposited it safely where misfortune can not tarnish it; where malice can not blast it. Favoured of heaven, he departed without exhibiting the weakness of humanity; magnanimous in death, the darkness of the grave could not obscure his brightness.

"With patriotic pride, we look back at the life of our Washington D.C. and compare him to those from other countries who have been widely celebrated. Both ancient and modern figures fall short in comparison to him. Greatness and wrongdoing have often been linked, but his fame is purer than it is dazzling. The destroyers of nations were humbled by the greatness of his virtues. It challenged their reckless ambitions and overshadowed their victories. The scene has closed, and we no longer worry that misfortune will tarnish his glory; he has completed his journey and carried with him an ever-growing weight of honor: he has placed it safely where misfortune cannot diminish it; where malice cannot destroy it. Blessed by heaven, he left us without showing any human weakness; noble in death, the darkness of the grave could not dim his light."

"Such was the man whom we deplore. Thanks to God, his glory is consummated. Washington yet lives on earth in his spotless example—his spirit is in heaven.

"Such was the man we mourn. Thank God, his glory is complete. Washington still lives on earth in his pure example—his spirit is in heaven."

"Let his countrymen consecrate the memory of the heroic general, the patriotic statesman, and the virtuous sage: let them teach their children never to forget that the fruits of his labours and his example are their inheritance."

"Let his fellow countrymen honor the memory of the heroic general, the patriotic statesman, and the virtuous sage: let them teach their children to always remember that the results of his hard work and his example are their inheritance."

To this address the President returned the following answer: "I receive, with the most respectful and affectionate sentiments, in this impressive address, the obliging expressions of your regret for the loss our country has sustained in the death of her most esteemed, beloved, and admired citizen.

To this address, the President replied with the following: "I accept, with the deepest respect and warmest feelings, this thoughtful message and your kind expressions of sorrow for the loss our country has endured with the passing of its most respected, beloved, and admired citizen."

"In the multitude of my thoughts and recollections on this melancholy event, you will permit me to say that I have seen him in the days of adversity, in some of the scenes of his deepest distress and most trying perplexities. I have also attended him in his highest elevation and most prosperous felicity, with uniform admiration of his wisdom, moderation, and constancy.

"In the many thoughts and memories I have about this sad event, I hope you’ll allow me to say that I’ve seen him during tough times, in some of his deepest distress and most challenging situations. I have also been with him during his greatest successes and happiest moments, consistently admiring his wisdom, moderation, and steadiness."

"Among all our original associates in that memorable league of this continent in 1774, which first expressed the Sovereign will of a Free Nation in America, he was the only one remaining in the general government. Although with a constitution more enfeebled than his, at an age when he thought it necessary to prepare for retirement, I feel myself alone, bereaved of my last brother; yet I derive a strong consolation from the unanimous disposition which appears in all ages and classes to mingle their sorrows with mine on this common calamity to the world.

"Among all our original associates in that memorable league of this continent in 1774, which first expressed the The will of a Free Nation in America., he was the only one left in the federal government. Even though his constitution was more weakened than mine, at an age when he thought it was time to prepare for retirement, I feel alone, grieving the loss of my last brother. Still, I find great comfort in the united sentiment that seems to exist across all ages and groups, sharing their grief with me over this shared tragedy for the world."

"The life of our Washington can not suffer by a comparison with those of other countries who have been most celebrated and exalted by fame. The attributes and decorations of royalty could only have served to eclipse the majesty of those virtues which made him, from being a modest citizen, a more resplendent luminary. Misfortune, had he lived, could hereafter have sullied his glory only with those superficial minds who, believing that characters and actions are marked by success alone, rarely deserve to enjoy it. Malice could never blast his honour, and Envy made him a singular exception to her universal rule. For himself, he had lived long enough to life and to glory:—for his fellow citizens, if their prayers could have been answered, he would have been immortal: for me, his departure is at a most unfortunate moment. Trusting, however, in the wise and righteous dominion of Providence over the passions of men, and the results of their councils and actions, as well as over their lives, nothing remains for me but humble resignation.

"The life of our Washington (State) cannot be compared to those of other countries that have been most celebrated and praised by fame. The symbols and trappings of royalty would only have overshadowed the greatness of the qualities that transformed him, from being a humble citizen, into a shining beacon. Misfortune, had he lived, could only tarnish his reputation in the eyes of those shallow thinkers who believe that character and actions are only defined by success, and who rarely truly deserve it. Malice could never damage his honor, and Envy made him a rare exception to her usual rule. He had lived long enough for both life and glory:—for his fellow citizens, if their wishes could have been granted, he would have been immortal; for me, his passing comes at a very unfortunate time. Nevertheless, trusting in the wise and just control of Providence over human passions, the outcomes of their decisions and actions, and their lives, all I can do is embrace humble resignation.

"His example is now complete; and it will teach wisdom and virtue to magistrates, citizens, and men, not only in the present age, but in future generations, as long as our history shall be read. If a Trajan found a Pliny, a Marcus Aurelius can never want biographers, eulogists, or historians."

"His example is now complete; and it will teach wisdom and virtue to officials, citizens, and individuals, not only in this age but in future generations, as long as our history is read. If a Trajan found a Pliny, a Marcus Aurelius will never lack biographers, admirers, or historians."

The joint committee which had been appointed to devise the mode by which the nation should express its feelings on this melancholy occasion, reported the following resolutions:

The joint committee that was set up to determine how the nation should express its emotions during this sad time reported the following resolutions:

"That a marble monument be erected by the United States at the city of Washington, and that the family of General Washington be requested to permit his body to be deposited under it; and that the monument be so designed as to commemorate the great events of his military and political life.

"That a marble monument be built by the United States in the city of Washington, and that the family of General Washington be asked to allow his body to be placed beneath it; and that the monument be designed to honor the significant events of his military and political career."

"That there be a funeral procession from congress hall to the German Lutheran church, in memory of General Washington, on Thursday, the 26th instant, and that an oration be prepared at the request of congress, to be delivered before both houses on that day; and that the president of the senate, and speaker of the house of representatives, be desired to request one of the members of congress to prepare and deliver the same.

"That there will be a funeral procession from Congress Hall to the German Lutheran Church in honor of General Washington on Thursday, the 26th of this month, and that a speech be prepared at the request of Congress to be delivered before both houses on that day; and that the president of the Senate and the speaker of the House of Representatives be asked to request one of the members of Congress to prepare and deliver it."

"That it be recommended to the people of the United States to wear crape on the left arm as a mourning for thirty days.

"That it be recommended to the people of the United States to wear black armbands as a sign of mourning for thirty days."

"That the President of the United States be requested to direct a copy of these resolutions to be transmitted to Mrs. Washington, assuring her of the profound respect congress will ever bear to her person and character, of their condolence on the late affecting dispensation of Providence, and entreating her assent to the interment of the remains of General Washington in the manner expressed in the first resolution.

"That the President of the United States be asked to send a copy of these resolutions to Mrs. Washington, assuring her of the deep respect Congress will always have for her person and character, expressing their condolences on the recent sad event from Providence, and requesting her agreement to the burial of General Washington's remains in the way detailed in the first resolution."

"That the President be requested to issue his proclamation, notifying to the people throughout the United States the recommendation contained in the third resolution."

"That the President be asked to issue his announcement, informing the people across the United States about the recommendation included in the third resolution."

These resolutions passed both houses unanimously, and those which would admit of immediate execution were carried into effect. The whole nation appeared in mourning. The funeral procession was grand and solemn, and the eloquent oration, which was delivered on the occasion by General Lee, was heard with profound attention and with deep interest.

These resolutions were approved unanimously by both houses, and those that could be implemented right away were put into action. The entire nation seemed to be in mourning. The funeral procession was impressive and serious, and the powerful speech given on the occasion by General Lee was listened to with great attention and deep interest.

Throughout the United States, similar marks of affliction were exhibited. In every part of the continent funeral orations were delivered, and the best talents of the nation were devoted to an expression of the nation's grief.

Throughout the United States, similar signs of sorrow were shown. In every part of the country, eulogies were given, and the best talents of the nation focused on expressing the country's grief.

To the letter of the President which transmitted to Mrs. Washington the resolutions of congress, and of which his secretary was the bearer, that lady answered, "Taught by the great example which I have so long had before me, never to oppose my private wishes to the public will, I must consent to the request made by congress which you have had the goodness to transmit to me;—and in doing this, I need not, I can not say what a sacrifice of individual feeling I make to a sense of public duty."

To the letter from the President that sent Mrs. Washington the resolutions from Congress, which his secretary delivered, she replied, "Having been inspired by the great example I've had for so long, I will never put my personal desires against the will of the public. I must agree to the request made by Congress that you have kindly shared with me; and in doing so, I don’t need to, and cannot, express what a sacrifice of personal feelings I’m making for the sake of public duty."

The monument, however, has not been erected. That the great events of the political as well as military life of General Washington should be commemorated, could not be pleasing to those who had condemned, and who continued to condemn, the whole course of his administration. This resolution, although it passed unanimously, had many enemies. That party which had long constituted the opposition, and which, though the minority for the moment, nearly divided the house of representatives, declared its preference for the equestrian statue which had been voted by congress at the close of the war. The division between a statue and a monument was so nearly equal, that the session passed away without an appropriation for either. The public feelings soon subsided, and those who possessed the ascendancy over the public sentiment employed their influence to draw odium on the men who favoured a monument; to represent that measure as a part of a general system to waste the public money; and to impress the idea that the only proper monument to the memory of a meritorious citizen, was that which the people would erect in their affections.

The monument, however, hasn’t been built. The idea of honoring the major political and military events of General Washington's life didn’t sit well with those who had criticized, and continued to criticize, his entire administration. This resolution, although it was approved unanimously, had many opponents. The party that had long been in the opposition, and which, although it was the minority at the moment, almost split the House of Representatives, expressed its preference for the equestrian statue that Congress had voted for at the end of the war. The divide between support for a statue and a monument was so close that the session ended without funding for either. Public interest soon faded, and those who had sway over public opinion used their influence to turn people against those who supported a monument; they portrayed it as part of a broader agenda to waste public funds and pushed the idea that the best way to honor a deserving citizen was through the affection of the people rather than a physical tribute.

 

Resting-Place of George and Martha Washington at Mount Vernon

George and Martha Washington's Final Resting Place at Mount Vernon

Dying December 14, 1799, the body of Washington Was placed, with simple but impressive ceremonies, in the old family vault, from which it was removed in 1831 to a tomb of plain brick construction, near a wooded ravine a short distance from the house. Behind an iron grating may be seen the two sarcophagi which contain the mortal remains of George Washington and his wife, Martha.

Died on December 14, 1799, Washington's body was laid to rest with simple yet impactful ceremonies in the old family vault. In 1831, it was moved to a plain brick tomb near a wooded ravine, not far from the house. Behind an iron grate, you can see the two sarcophagi that hold the remains of George Washington and his wife, Martha.

 

General Washington was rather above the common size, his frame was robust, and his constitution vigorous—capable of enduring great fatigue, and requiring a considerable degree of exercise for the preservation of his health. His exterior created in the beholder the idea of strength, united with manly gracefulness.

General Washington was taller than average, with a strong build and a vigorous constitution—able to withstand significant fatigue and needing a good amount of exercise to maintain his health. His appearance gave the impression of strength combined with masculine grace.

And character.

His manners were rather reserved than free, though they partook nothing of that dryness, and sternness, which accompany reserve when carried to an extreme; and on all proper occasions, he could relax sufficiently to show how highly he was gratified by the charms of conversation, and the pleasures of society. His person and whole deportment exhibited an unaffected and indescribable dignity, unmingled with haughtiness, of which all who approached him were sensible; and the attachment of those who possessed his friendship, and enjoyed his intimacy, was ardent, but always respectful.

His manners were more reserved than casual, but they didn’t have the dryness or sternness that often comes with extreme reserve. On the right occasions, he could loosen up enough to show how much he appreciated engaging conversations and the joys of being with others. His presence and overall demeanor displayed a natural and indescribable dignity that wasn’t mixed with arrogance, which everyone who came near him could sense. Those who had his friendship and enjoyed his closeness felt a deep attachment, but it was always respectful.

His temper was humane, benevolent, and conciliatory; but there was a quickness in his sensibility to any thing apparently offensive, which experience had taught him to watch, and to correct.

His temper was kind, generous, and easygoing; but he had a sensitive reaction to anything that seemed offensive, which experience had taught him to monitor and adjust.

In the management of his private affairs he exhibited an exact yet liberal economy. His funds were not prodigally wasted on capricious and ill examined schemes, nor refused to beneficial though costly improvements. They remained therefore competent to that expensive establishment which his reputation, added to a hospitable temper, had in some measure imposed upon him; and to those donations which real distress has a right to claim from opulence.

In managing his personal affairs, he demonstrated a careful yet generous approach to finances. His money wasn’t recklessly spent on whimsical and poorly thought-out projects, nor was it withheld from useful but expensive upgrades. As a result, he was able to support the lavish lifestyle his reputation and welcoming nature somewhat required of him, as well as contribute to those in genuine need who have a right to expect help from the wealthy.

He made no pretensions to that vivacity which fascinates, or to that wit which dazzles, and frequently imposes on the understanding-More solid than brilliant, judgment, rather than genius, constituted the most prominent feature of his character.

He didn't pretend to have the charm that captivates or the cleverness that impresses and often confuses. More grounded than flashy, his character was defined more by sound judgment than by sheer genius.

Without making ostentatious professions of religion, he was a sincere believer in the Christian faith, and a truly devout man.

Without making flashy displays of his faith, he was a genuine believer in Christianity and a truly devoted person.

As a military man, he was brave, enterprising, and cautious. That malignity which was sought to strip him of all the higher qualities of a General, has conceded to him personal courage, and a firmness of resolution which neither dangers nor difficulties could shake. But candour will allow him other great and valuable endowments. If his military course does not abound with splendid achievements, it exhibits a series of judicious measures adapted to circumstances, which probably saved his country.

As a soldier, he was brave, resourceful, and careful. The spite directed at him in an attempt to deny him the higher qualities of a General has at least acknowledged his personal courage and a steadfast determination that neither threats nor challenges could undermine. However, honesty also recognizes that he possessed other significant and valuable traits. While his military career may not be filled with extraordinary accomplishments, it shows a series of wise decisions tailored to the situation, which likely saved his country.

Placed, without having studied the theory, or been taught in the school of experience the practice of war, at the head of an undisciplined, ill organized multitude, which was impatient of the restraints, and unacquainted with the ordinary duties of a camp, without the aid of officers possessing those lights which the Commander-in-chief was yet to acquire, it would have been a miracle indeed had his conduct been absolutely faultless. But, possessing an energetic and distinguishing mind, on which the lessons of experience were never lost, his errors, if he committed any, were quickly repaired; and those measures which the state of things rendered most adviseable, were seldom, if ever, neglected. Inferior to his adversary in the numbers, in the equipment, and in the discipline of his troops, it is evidence of real merit that no great and decisive advantages were ever obtained over him, and that the opportunity to strike an important blow never passed away unused. He has been termed the American Fabius; but those who compare his actions with his means, will perceive at least as much of Marcellus as of Fabius, in his character. He could not have been more enterprising, without endangering the cause he defended, nor have put more to hazard, without incurring justly the imputation of rashness. Not relying upon those chances which sometimes give a favourable issue to attempts apparently desperate, his conduct was regulated by calculations made upon the capacities of his army, and the real situation of his country. When called a second time to command the armies of the United States, a change of circumstances had taken place, and he meditated a corresponding change of conduct. In modelling the army of 1798, he sought for men distinguished for their boldness of execution, not less than for their prudence in counsel, and contemplated a system of continued attack. "The enemy," said the General in his private letters, "must never be permitted to gain foothold on our shores."

Placed at the head of a disorganized, poorly trained group, without having studied the theory of war or learned the practical experiences in the field, it would have been nothing short of a miracle for his actions to be entirely flawless. However, with an energetic and perceptive mind that absorbed lessons from experience, any mistakes he made were quickly corrected, and he rarely neglected the most advisable measures given the circumstances. Though outnumbered, outfitted, and out-disciplined by his enemy, it shows true skill that he never suffered any major decisive defeats, and he consistently seized opportunities to strike when they arose. He has been called the American Fabius; however, those who compare his actions to his resources will see elements of both Marcellus and Fabius in his character. He couldn't have been more daring without putting the cause he defended at risk, nor could he have risked more without justifiably being called reckless. Instead of relying on random chances that sometimes yield successful outcomes in seemingly hopeless situations, he based his actions on careful calculations of his army's capabilities and the actual condition of his country. When he was appointed again to lead the armies of the United States, circumstances had changed, and he planned a corresponding shift in strategy. In reorganizing the army of 1798, he looked for leaders who were both bold in action and prudent in advice, and he aimed for a strategy of continuous attacks. "The enemy," the General wrote in his private letters, "must never be allowed to establish a presence on our shores."

In his civil administration, as in his military career, ample and repeated proofs were exhibited of that practical good sense, of that sound judgment, which is perhaps the most rare, and is certainly the most valuable quality of the human mind. Devoting himself to the duties of his station, and pursuing no object distinct from the public good, he was accustomed to contemplate at a distance those critical situations in which the United States might probably be placed; and to digest, before the occasion required action, the line of conduct which it would be proper to observe. Taught to distrust first impressions, he sought to acquire all the information which was attainable, and to hear, without prejudice, all the reasons which could be urged for or against a particular measure. His own judgment was suspended until it became necessary to determine; and his decisions, thus maturely made, were seldom if ever to be shaken. His conduct therefore was systematic, and the great objects of his administration were steadily pursued.

In his civil administration, just like in his military career, he consistently demonstrated practical common sense and sound judgment, which are probably the rarest and definitely the most valuable qualities of the human mind. Committed to his duties and focused solely on the public good, he would think ahead about the critical situations the United States might face and plan the appropriate course of action before any situation required it. Learning to be cautious about first impressions, he aimed to gather as much information as possible and to listen impartially to all the arguments for or against a specific measure. He held off on making judgments until it was necessary, and his carefully considered decisions were rarely, if ever, swayed. Thus, his approach was systematic, and he consistently pursued the major goals of his administration.

Respecting, as the first magistrate in a free government must ever do, the real and deliberate sentiments of the people, their gusts of passion passed over, without ruffling the smooth surface of his mind. Trusting to the reflecting good sense of the nation for approbation and support, he had the magnanimity to pursue its real interests, in opposition to its temporary prejudices; and, though far from being regardless of popular favour, he could never stoop to retain, by deserving to lose it. In more instances than one, we find him committing his whole popularity to hazard, and pursuing steadily, in opposition to a torrent which would have overwhelmed a man of ordinary firmness, that course which had been dictated by a sense of duty.

Respecting, as the first leader in a free government always should, the genuine and thoughtful feelings of the people, he allowed their emotional outbursts to pass by without disturbing his calm demeanor. Relying on the sensible judgment of the nation for approval and support, he had the courage to pursue its true interests, even against its temporary biases; and, while he valued public approval, he would never lower himself to keep it by actions that would make him unworthy. In several instances, we see him risking his entire reputation and consistently following a path guided by duty, even in the face of overwhelming opposition that would have toppled someone with less resolve.

In speculation, he was a real republican, devoted to the constitution of his country, and to that system of equal political rights on which it is founded. But between a balanced republic and a democracy, the difference is like that between order and chaos. Real liberty, he thought, was to be preserved, only by preserving the authority of the laws, and maintaining the energy of government. Scarcely did society present two characters which, in his opinion, less resembled each other, than a patriot and a demagogue.

In terms of belief, he was a true republican, committed to his country's constitution and the system of equal political rights it establishes. However, the distinction between a balanced republic and a democracy is like the difference between order and chaos. He believed that true freedom could only be protected by upholding the authority of the laws and ensuring a strong government. In his view, there were hardly two figures in society that resembled each other less than a patriot and a demagogue.

No man has ever appeared upon the theatre of public action, whose integrity was more incorruptible, or whose principles were more perfectly free from the contamination of those selfish and unworthy passions, which find their nourishment in the conflicts of party. Having no views which required concealment, his real and avowed motives were the same; and his whole correspondence does not furnish a single case, from which even an enemy would infer that he was capable, under any circumstances, of stooping to the employment of duplicity. No truth can be uttered with more confidence than that his ends were always upright, and his means always pure. He exhibits the rare example of a politician to whom wiles were absolutely unknown, and whose professions to foreign governments, and to his own countrymen, were always sincere. In him was fully exemplified the real distinction, which forever exists, between wisdom and cunning, and the importance as well as truth of the maxim that "honesty is the best policy."

No man has ever stepped onto the stage of public life with more unwavering integrity or whose principles were completely free from the selfish and unworthy passions that thrive in partisan conflict. With nothing to hide, his true and stated motives aligned perfectly, and his entire correspondence doesn't provide a single instance from which even an adversary could claim he was capable, under any circumstances, of resorting to deception. There’s no truth more confidently asserted than that his goals were always noble and his methods always honest. He stands as a rare example of a politician completely untouched by trickery, whose statements to foreign governments and to his fellow citizens were always genuine. In him, we see clearly the enduring difference between wisdom and cunning, and the significant truth of the saying that "honesty is the best policy."

If Washington possessed ambition, that passion was, in his bosom, so regulated by principles, or controlled by circumstances, that it was neither vicious, nor turbulent. Intrigue was never employed as the means of its gratification, nor was personal aggrandizement its object. The various high and important stations to which he was called by the public voice, were unsought by himself; and, in consenting to fill them, he seems rather to have yielded to a general conviction that the interests of his country would be thereby promoted, than to an avidity for power.

If Washington had ambition, that passion was kept in check by his principles and the circumstances around him, so it wasn’t harmful or chaotic. He never resorted to schemes to satisfy it, nor was personal gain his goal. The various prestigious positions he held, chosen by the public, were not something he actively sought; when he agreed to take them, it seemed more like he was responding to a widespread belief that his country would benefit from his involvement rather than a desire for power.

Neither the extraordinary partiality of the American people, the extravagant praises which were bestowed upon him, nor the inveterate opposition and malignant calumnies which he encountered, had any visible influence upon his conduct. The cause is to be looked for in the texture of his mind.

Neither the intense favoritism of the American people, the lavish praises he received, nor the persistent opposition and harmful slanders he faced had any noticeable effect on his behavior. The reason lies in the nature of his mind.

In him, that innate and unassuming modesty which adulation would have offended, which the voluntary plaudits of millions could not betray into indiscretion, and which never obtruded upon others his claims to superior consideration, was happily blended with a high and correct sense of personal dignity, and with a just consciousness of that respect which is due to station. Without exertion, he could maintain the happy medium between that arrogance which wounds, and that facility which allows the office to be degraded in the person who fills it.

In him, that natural and humble modesty which flattery would have offended, which the voluntary praise of millions could not push into imprudence, and which never forced his claims to higher regard onto others, was skillfully mixed with a strong and proper sense of personal dignity, along with a rightful awareness of the respect that his position deserved. Without any effort, he managed to balance perfectly between the arrogance that hurts and the easygoing nature that lets the role be diminished in the one who occupies it.

It is impossible to contemplate the great events which have occurred in the United States under the auspices of Washington, without ascribing them, in some measure, to him. If we ask the causes of the prosperous issue of a war, against the successful termination of which there were so many probabilities? of the good which was produced, and the ill which was avoided, during an administration fated to contend with the strongest prejudices, that a combination of circumstances, and of passions, could produce? of the constant favour of the great mass of his fellow citizens, and of the confidence which, to the last moment of his life, they reposed in him? the answer, so far as these causes may be found in his character, will furnish a lesson well meriting the attention of those who are candidates for political fame.

It’s impossible to think about the major events that have happened in the United States under Washington’s leadership without attributing some of their success to him. If we consider the reasons behind the successful outcome of a war that had so many odds stacked against it, the benefits that came about, and the troubles that were avoided during a presidency that had to deal with strong biases—alongside a mix of circumstances and emotions—along with the ongoing support from a large portion of his fellow citizens, and the trust they placed in him right up to his final moments, the answer, particularly concerning his character, offers valuable lessons for those aspiring to political success.

Endowed by nature with a sound judgment, and an accurate discriminating mind, he feared not that laborious attention which made him perfectly master of those subjects, in all their relations, on which he was to decide: and this essential quality was guided by an unvarying sense of moral right, which would tolerate the employment, only, of those means that would bear the most rigid examination; by a fairness of intention which neither sought nor required disguise: and by a purity of virtue which was not only untainted, but unsuspected.

Blessed by nature with good judgment and a keen mind, he did not shy away from the diligent focus that made him a true expert on the topics he was to decide upon. This vital quality was directed by a consistent sense of moral integrity, which allowed only the methods that could withstand the strictest scrutiny; by an honesty of purpose that neither sought nor needed disguise; and by a virtue that was not only untouched but also unassumed.


NOTES.

NOTE—No. I. See Page 9.

The following are copies of these interesting questions, and of the letter which enclosed them.

Here are copies of these interesting questions and the letter that came with them.

Philadelphia, 18th April, 1793.

Philadelphia, April 18, 1793.

Sir,—The posture of affairs in Europe, particularly between France and Great Britain, place the United States in a delicate situation, and require much consideration of the measures which will be proper for them to observe in the war between those powers. With a view to forming a general plan of conduct for the executive, I have stated and enclosed sundry questions to be considered preparatory to a meeting at my house to-morrow, where I shall expect to see you at 9 o'clock, and to receive the result of your reflections thereon.

Mr.,—The situation in Europe, especially between France and Great Britain, puts the United States in a tricky position, requiring careful thought about what actions they should take in the conflict between those nations. To help create a general plan for the executive, I have laid out several questions for us to think about before a meeting at my house tomorrow, where I look forward to seeing you at 9 o'clock and hearing your thoughts on these matters.

Ques. I. Shall a proclamation issue for the purpose of preventing interferences of the citizens of the United States in the war between France and Great Britain, &c.? shall it contain a declaration of neutrality or not? what shall it contain?

Ques. I. Should there be a proclamation to prevent citizens of the United States from interfering in the war between France and Great Britain, etc.? Should it include a declaration of neutrality or not? What should it include?

Ques. II. Shall a minister from the republic of France be received?

Ques. II. Should a minister from the Republic of France be welcomed?

Ques. III. If received, shall it be absolutely or with qualifications; and if with qualifications, of what kind?

Ques. III. If accepted, will it be unconditionally or with conditions; and if with conditions, what kind?

Ques. IV. Are the United States obliged by good faith to consider the treaties heretofore made with France as applying to the present situation of the parties? may they either renounce them or hold them suspended until the government of France shall be established?

Ques. IV. Are the United States required in good faith to consider the treaties that were previously made with France as relevant to the current situation of the parties? Can they either reject them or keep them on hold until the government of France is established?

Ques. V. If they have the right, is it expedient to do either? and which?

Ques. V. If they have the right, is it practical to do either? And if so, which one?

Ques. VI. If they have an option, would it be a breach of neutrality to consider the treaties still in operation?

Ques. VI. If they have a choice, would it be a violation of neutrality to regard the treaties as still active?

Ques. VII. If the treaties are to be considered as now in operation, is the guarantee in the treaty of alliance applicable to a defensive war only, or to war, either offensive or defensive?

Ques. VII. If the treaties are currently in effect, does the guarantee in the treaty of alliance apply only to defensive wars, or to wars that are either offensive or defensive?

Ques. VIII. Does the war in which France is engaged appear to be offensive or defensive on her part? or of a mixed and equivocal character?

Ques. VIII. Does the war that France is involved in seem to be offensive or defensive on her part? Or is it of a mixed and unclear nature?

Ques. IX. If of a mixed and equivocal character, does the guarantee in any event apply to such a war?

Ques. IX. If it's a mixed and unclear situation, does the guarantee apply to that war in any case?

Ques. X. What is the effect of a guarantee, such as that to be found in the treaty of alliance between the United States and France?

Ques. X. What is the impact of a guarantee, like the one in the alliance treaty between the United States and France?

Ques. XI. Does any article in either of the treaties prevent ships of war, other than privateers, of the powers opposed to France, from coming into the ports of the United States to act as convoys to their own merchantmen? or does it lay any other restraints upon them more than would apply to the ships of war of France?

Ques. XI. Is there any provision in either treaty that stops warships, aside from privateers, from countries against France from entering U.S. ports to escort their own merchant ships? Or does it impose any other restrictions on them that would not also apply to French warships?

Ques. XII. Should the future regent of France send a minister to the United States, ought he to be received?

Ques. XII. If the future regent of France sends a minister to the United States, should he be received?

Ques. XIII. Is it necessary or adviseable to call together the two houses of congress with a view to the present posture of European affairs? if it is, what should be the particular objects of such a call?

Ques. XIII. Should the two houses of Congress be gathered to discuss the current state of European affairs? If so, what specific topics should be addressed during this meeting?


NOTE—No. II. See Page 15.

The official letter announcing to the convention the appointment of Mr. Genet, contained a communication of a very delicate nature, which was immediately made public. That the French government had not mingled with its desire to separate America from Britain, a willingness to see the United States acquire a degree of strength which might render them truly independent, and formidable to their neighbours, though well known to congress, had been concealed from the people at large. It seems, therefore, to have been apprehended by the leaders of the revolution in France, that some remnant of that affection which had been so lavishly expressed for their fallen monarch while exercising sovereign power, might still be cherished in the American bosom, and might obstruct the endeavours they were about to make to produce a more intimate connexion between the two nations. It might be supposed that such sentiments, if they existed, would be effectually destroyed by a disclosure of the motives which had influenced the conduct of those by whom the aids so highly valued had been granted. The letter alluded to contains this passage: "From the instructions that were given by the former ministry to the agents in that country (America) which the executive council caused to be laid before them, they have seen with indignation, that at the very time when the good people of America expressed to us their friendship and gratitude in the most affectionate manner, Vergennes and Montmorin thought, that it was not suitable to France to give to America all the consistence of which it was capable, because it would acquire a strength which it might probably abuse. They, therefore, enjoined on their agents a passive conduct in regard to that nation, and to speak of nothing but the personal views of the king for its prosperity. The operations of war were directed by the same Machiavellian maxims. The same duplicity was employed in the negotiations of peace; in which, when signed, the people for whom we had taken up arms were altogether neglected." The official letter brought by Mr. Genet, to the executive of the United States, conveyed in less explicit terms the same idea; and to prove the correctness of these allegations, he communicated copies of official documents expressing in plain terms the solicitude of France and Spain to exclude the United States from the Mississippi; their jealousies of the growing power and ambition of this country; and the wish of France, expressed while the question was pending, that the constitution might not be adopted, as it "suits France that the United States should remain in their present state, because if they should acquire the consistence of which they are susceptible, they would soon acquire a force or a power which they would be very ready to abuse." The minister of the king, however, was directed not to avow the inclination of his sovereign on this point.

The official letter announcing Mr. Genet's appointment to the convention included a very sensitive communication that was quickly made public. While the French government’s desire to separate America from Britain was clear, it also showed a willingness to see the United States gain enough strength to become truly independent and a force to be reckoned with, though this was kept hidden from the general public despite being known to Congress. It appears that the leaders of the revolution in France feared that some lingering affection for their fallen monarch, previously expressed during his reign, might still exist in America and interfere with their efforts to strengthen ties between the two nations. It might be assumed that if such sentiments were present, they would be effectively extinguished by revealing the reasons behind the actions of those who provided the highly valued support. The letter mentioned a passage: "From the instructions that were given by the former ministry to the agents in that country (America) which the executive council caused to be laid before them, they have seen with indignation, that at the very time when the good people of America expressed to us their friendship and gratitude in the most affectionate manner, Vergennes and Montmorin thought, that it was not suitable to France to give to America all the consistence of which it was capable, because it would acquire a strength which it might probably abuse. They, therefore, ordered their agents to take a passive approach regarding that nation and to speak only of the king's personal desires for its prosperity. The conduct of the war was guided by the same Machiavellian principles. The same duplicity was used in peace negotiations, which, once signed, completely disregarded the people for whom we had fought." The official letter brought by Mr. Genet to the United States government conveyed the same idea in less explicit terms. To support these claims, he provided copies of official documents clearly showing France and Spain's concern over excluding the United States from the Mississippi, their jealousy over the rising power and ambition of this country, and France's expressed wish during the debates that the constitution not be adopted, as it "suits France that the United States should remain in their current state, because if they should gain the strength they are capable of, they would soon have a power that they would be very eager to abuse." However, the king's minister was instructed not to acknowledge his sovereign's feelings on this issue.


NOTE—No. III. See Page 40.

Of the excessive and passionate devotion which was felt for the French republic, and of the blind and almost equally extensive hostility to the measures of the administration, the gazettes of the day are replete with the most abundant proof. As an example of this spirit, the following toasts are selected, because they were given at a festival made by persons of some distinction, at which the governor of Pennsylvania and the minister of France were present.

Of the intense and passionate loyalty felt for the French republic, and of the almost equally widespread anger towards the government's actions, the newspapers of the time are full of abundant evidence. As an example of this sentiment, the following toasts are chosen because they were presented at a celebration attended by some notable individuals, including the governor of Pennsylvania and the French minister.

To commemorate the 14th of July, the anniversary of the destruction of the Bastille, the officers of the 2d regiment of Philadelphia militia assembled at Weed's ferry. Eighty-five rounds were discharged from the artillery in honour of the eighty-five departments of France, and the following toasts were given:

To celebrate July 14th, the anniversary of the fall of the Bastille, the officers of the 2nd regiment of Philadelphia militia gathered at Weed's ferry. Eighty-five rounds were fired from the artillery in honor of the eighty-five departments of France, and the following toasts were made:

1st. The fourteenth day of July; may it be a sabbath in the calendar of freedom, and a jubilee to the European world.

1st. The fourteenth day of July; may it be a day of rest in the calendar of freedom, and a celebration for the European world.

2d. The tenth of August; may the freemen who offered up their lives on the altar of liberty be ever remembered as martyrs, and canonized as saints.

2d. The tenth of August; may the free people who sacrificed their lives for liberty always be remembered as martyrs and honored as saints.

3d. May the Bastille of despotism throughout the earth be crumbled into dust, and the Phoenix of freedom grow out of the ashes.

3d. May the fortress of tyranny across the world be reduced to dust, and the Phoenix of freedom rise from the ashes.

4th. Nerve to the arm, fortitude to the heart, and triumph to the soul struggling for the rights of man.

4th. Strength to the arm, courage to the heart, and victory to the soul fighting for human rights.

5th. May no blind attachment to men lead France to the precipice of that tyranny from which they have escaped.

5th. May no blind loyalty to individuals drive France to the brink of the tyranny they have just escaped.

6th. May the sister republics of France and America be as incorporate as light and heat, and the man who endeavours to disunite them be viewed as the Arnold of his country.

6th. May the sister republics of France and America be as united as light and heat, and anyone who tries to separate them be seen as the Arnold of their country.

7th. May honour and probity be the principles by which the connexions of free nations shall be determined; and no Machiavellian commentaries explain the text of treaties.

7th. May honor and integrity be the principles that guide the relationships of free nations; and let no Machiavellian interpretations distort the meaning of treaties.

8th. The treaty of alliance with France: may those who attempt to evade or violate the political obligations and faith of our country be considered as traitors, and consigned to infamy.

8th. The treaty of alliance with France: may those who try to avoid or break the political responsibilities and trust of our nation be seen as traitors and marked with disgrace.

9th. The citizen soldiers, before they act may they know and approve the cause, and may remorse attend the man that would think of opposing the French while they war for the rights of man.

9th. The citizen soldiers, before they take action, should know and support the cause, and may regret follow anyone who thinks of opposing the French while they fight for human rights.

10th. The youth of the Paris legion; may the rising generation of America imitate their heroism and love of country.

10th. The youth of the Paris legion; may the younger generation of America emulate their bravery and patriotism.

11th. The republics of France and America; may the cause of liberty ever be a bond of union between the two nations.

11th. The republics of France and America; may the cause of liberty always unite the two nations.

12th. A dagger to the bosom of that man who makes patriotism a cover to his ambition, and feels his country's happiness absorbed in his own.

12th. A dagger to the heart of that man who uses patriotism as a mask for his own ambition and believes that his happiness is the same as his country's well-being.

13th. May French, superior to Roman or Grecian virtue, be the electric fluid of freedom, that shall animate and quicken the earth.

13th. May French, better than Roman or Grecian virtue, may be the electric energy of freedom that will inspire and revitalize the world.

14th. Union and mutual confidence to the patriots of France; confusion and distress to the counsels of their enemies.

14th. Unity and trust among the patriots of France; chaos and distress for the strategies of their enemies.

15th. May the succeeding generation wonder that such beings as kings were ever permitted to exist.

15th. May the next generation marvel that such beings as kings were ever allowed to exist.

Volunteer from the chair.

Volunteer from the seat.

The rule of proportion; as France acted with respect to America, so may America act with respect to France!

The rule of proportion: just as France acted toward America, America can act toward France!


NOTE—No. IV. See Page 47.

Of the sensibility of the president to the calumnies against his administration with which the press abounded, and of their new direction against him personally, his correspondence furnishes but few evidences. The first and almost only notice taken of them is in a private letter of the 21st of July, to his friend General Lee, then governor of Virginia, an extract from which follows:

Of the president's sensitivity to the false accusations against his administration that were rampant in the press, and the new attacks aimed at him personally, his letters provide only a few examples. The first and almost only mention of them is in a private letter dated July 21, to his friend General Lee, who was then the governor of Virginia, an excerpt of which follows:

"That there are in this, as in all other countries, discontented characters I well know; as also that these characters are actuated by very different views:—Some good, from an opinion that the measures of the general government are impure;—some bad, and (if I might be allowed to use so harsh an expression) diabolical, inasmuch as they are not only meant to impede the measures of that government generally, but more especially to destroy the confidence which it is necessary the people should place (until they have unequivocal proof of demerit) in their public servants:—for in this light I consider myself whilst I am an occupant of office; and if they were to go further and call me their slave, during this period, I would not dispute the point with them. But in what will this abuse terminate?

I know that there are unhappy people in this, just like in every other country, and that these individuals have very different motivations: some have good intentions, believing that the actions of the government are corrupt; others have bad and, if I may be blunt, wicked intentions, as they aim not only to obstruct the government's actions but especially to undermine the public's trust in it, which is essential for people to have until they have clear evidence of wrongdoing. I see myself in this role while I am in office; if they were to go so far as to call me their servant during this time, I wouldn't argue with them about it. But what will come of this abuse?

"For the result, as it respects myself, I care not. I have a consolation within of which no earthly efforts can deprive me;—and that is, that neither ambitious nor interested motives have influenced my conduct. The arrows of malevolence, therefore, however barbed and pointed, can never reach my most valuable part; though, whilst I am up as a mark, they will be continually aimed at me. The publications in Freneau's and Bache's papers are outrages on common decency; and they progress in that style in proportion as their pieces are treated with contempt, and passed over in silence by those against whom they are directed. Their tendency, however, is too obvious to be mistaken by men of cool and dispassionate minds;—and, in my opinion, ought to alarm them; because it is difficult to prescribe bounds to their effect."

"For the outcome, as far as I’m concerned, I don’t care. I have a comfort inside that nothing earthly can take away from me; and that is that neither ambitious nor selfish motives have shaped my actions. The arrows of malice, therefore, no matter how sharp and pointed, can never hit my most important self; although, while I’m a target, they will always be aimed at me. The articles in Freneau's and Bache's papers are assaults on basic decency; and they keep advancing in that manner as their pieces are ignored and overlooked by those they target. Their purpose, however, is too clear to be misunderstood by rational and level-headed people;—and, in my view, should concern them because it’s hard to set limits on their impact."


NOTE—No. V. See Page 48.

They are as follows:

They are as follows:

1st. The original arming and equipping of vessels in the ports of the United States by any of the belligerent parties, for military service, offensive or defensive, is deemed unlawful.

1st. The initial arming and equipping of ships in the ports of the United States by any of the warring parties, for military use, whether offensive or defensive, is considered illegal.

2d. Equipments of merchant vessels, by either of the belligerent parties in the ports of the United States, purely for the accommodation of them as such, is deemed lawful.

2d. Equipment of merchant ships, by either of the warring parties in the ports of the United States, solely for their own use, is considered legal.

3d. Equipments in the ports of the United States of vessels of war in the immediate service of the government of any of the belligerent parties, which if done to other vessels would be of a doubtful nature as being applicable either to commerce or war, are deemed lawful, except those which shall have made prize of the subjects, people, or property of France, coming with their prizes into the ports of the United States pursuant to the seventeenth article of our treaty of amity and commerce with France.

3d. Equipment in the ports of the United States for warships in the direct service of the government of any of the competing parties, which if done for other vessels might be questionable in nature as relating to either trade or warfare, are considered legal, except for those that have captured the subjects, people, or property of France, arriving with their captures in the ports of the United States in accordance with the seventeenth article of our treaty of friendship and commerce with France.

4th. Equipments in the ports of the United States by any of the parties at war with France of vessels fitted for merchandise and war, whether with or without commissions, which are doubtful in their nature as being applicable either to commerce or war, are deemed lawful, except those which shall have made prize, &c.

4th. Equipment in the ports of the United States by any of the parties at war with France of vessels prepared for trade and war, whether with or without commissions, which are uncertain in their nature as being applicable to either commerce or war, is considered lawful, except those that have made a prize, etc.

5th. Equipments of any of the vessels of France, in the ports of the United States, which are doubtful in their nature as being applicable to commerce or war, are deemed lawful.

5th. Equipment of any of the vessels of France, in the ports of the United States, that is questionable in its purpose for commerce or war, is considered lawful.

6th. Equipments of every kind in the ports of the United States, of privateers of the powers at war with France, are deemed unlawful.

6th. Equipment of any kind in the ports of the United States, belonging to privateers of the countries at war with France, is considered illegal.

7th. Equipments of vessels in the ports of the United States, which are of a nature solely adapted to war, are deemed unlawful; except those stranded or wrecked, as mentioned in the eighteenth article of our treaty with France, the sixteenth of our treaty with the United Netherlands, the ninth of our treaty with Prussia, and except those mentioned in the nineteenth article of our treaty with France, the seventeenth of our treaty with the United Netherlands, the eighteenth of our treaty with Prussia.

7th. The equipment of vessels in U.S. ports that is solely intended for war is considered unlawful, except for those that are stranded or wrecked, as outlined in the eighteenth article of our treaty with France, the sixteenth of our treaty with the United Netherlands, the ninth of our treaty with Prussia, and except for those mentioned in the nineteenth article of our treaty with France, the seventeenth of our treaty with the United Netherlands, and the eighteenth of our treaty with Prussia.

8th. Vessels of either of the parties, not armed, or armed previous to their coming into the ports of the United States, which shall not have infringed any of the foregoing rules, may lawfully engage or enlist therein their own subjects or citizens, not being inhabitants of the United States, except privateers of the powers at war with France, and except those vessels which shall have made prize, &c.

8th. Vessels from either party, whether unarmed or armed before arriving in the ports of the United States, that have not violated any of the rules mentioned above, may legally recruit or enlist their own subjects or citizens, who are not residents of the United States, except for privateers from countries at war with France, and except for those vessels that have made a prize, etc.


NOTE—No. VI. See Page 64.

The earnestness as well as force with which the argument against this measure was pressed on the British cabinet, and the extreme irritation it produced on the public mind, contrasted with the silence of the executive respecting a much more exceptionable decree of the national convention, and the composure of the people of the United States under that decree, exhibits a striking proof of the difference with which not only the people, but an administration, which the phrensy of the day accused of partiality to England, contemplated at that time the measures of the two nations.

The seriousness and intensity with which the argument against this measure was presented to the British cabinet, along with the significant annoyance it caused in the public, stood in stark contrast to the lack of response from the executive regarding a much more questionable decree from the national convention, and the calmness of the American people in response to that decree. This highlights a clear difference in how both the public and an administration—accused by the frenzy of the time of favoring England—viewed the actions of the two nations at that moment.

On the 9th of May, 1793, the national convention passed a decree relative to the commerce of neutrals; the first article of which is in these words: "The French ships of war and privateers may stop and bring into the ports of the republic, such neutral vessels as are loaded, in whole or in part either with provisions belonging to neutrals and destined for enemy ports, or with merchandise belonging to enemies."

On May 9, 1793, the national convention approved a decree regarding neutral trade; the first article states: "French warships and privateers can stop and bring into the republic's ports any neutral vessels that are fully or partially loaded with supplies owned by neutrals and headed for enemy ports, or with goods owned by enemies."

On the 23d of May, in consequence of the remonstrances of Mr. Morris, the convention declared, "that the vessels of the United States are not comprised in the regulations of the decree of the 9th of May." On the 28th of the same month the decree of the 23d was repealed, and on the first of July it was re-established. But on the 27th of July it was again repealed, and thus the decree of the 9th of May was left in full operation against the vessels of the United States.

On May 23rd, due to Mr. Morris's protests, the convention stated, "the vessels of the United States are not included in the regulations of the decree from May 9th." On May 28th, the decree from the 23rd was canceled, but it was reinstated on July 1st. However, it was repealed again on July 27th, leaving the decree from May 9th fully in effect against the vessels of the United States.

So far was this regulation from affecting the sentiments of America for France, that its existence was scarcely known.

This regulation had such little impact on America's feelings toward France that most people barely knew it existed.


NOTE—No. VII. See Page 90.

Before these resolutions were offered, the strength of parties was in some measure tried in a fuller house than that which had elected the speaker.

Before these resolutions were presented, the power of the parties was somewhat tested in a larger assembly than the one that elected the speaker.

A rule had been entered into by a former congress providing, that on the discussion of confidential communications from the president, the house should be cleared of all persons except the members and clerk. On taking up a confidential message relative to the truce between Portugal and Algiers, the doors as usual were closed. The next day when the subject was resumed, Mr. Nicholas expressed his opinion that there was no necessity for shutting the galleries; upon which the rule was mentioned with a request that it should be read. Mr. Madison moved a reconsideration of this rule. In the course of the debate on the motion, it was said by its advocates that secrecy in a republican government wounds the majesty of the sovereign people—that this government is in the hands of the people—and that they have a right to know all the transactions relative to their own affairs. This right ought not to be infringed incautiously, for such secrecy tends to diminish the confidence of the people in their own government.

A rule was established by a previous congress stating that when discussing confidential messages from the president, the house should be cleared of everyone except the members and the clerk. When addressing a confidential message about the truce between Portugal and Algiers, the doors were closed as usual. The next day, when the topic was brought up again, Mr. Nicholas argued that there was no need to close the galleries; this led to the rule being mentioned with a request to have it read aloud. Mr. Madison proposed a reconsideration of this rule. During the debate on this motion, supporters argued that secrecy in a republic undermines the authority of the sovereign people—that this government belongs to the people—and that they have the right to know all matters concerning their own affairs. This right should not be taken lightly, as such secrecy can erode the public's trust in their own government.

In reply to these remarks it was said, that because this government is republican, it will not be pretended that it can have no secrets. The President of the United States is the depositary of secret transactions. His duty may lead him to communicate them to the members of the house, and the success, safety, and energy of the government may depend on keeping those secrets inviolable. The people have a right to be well governed. They have interests as well as rights, and it is the duty of the legislature to take every possible measure to promote those interests. To discuss the secret transactions of the government publicly, was the ready way to sacrifice the public interest, and to deprive the government of all foreign information. Afterwards the rule was amended so far as to leave it in the discretion of the house, after receiving a confidential message, to debate upon it in private or in public.

In response to these comments, it was stated that because this government is a republic, it can't be assumed that it has no secrets. The President of the United States is responsible for secret dealings. His role might require him to share these with the members of Congress, and the success, safety, and effectiveness of the government might hinge on keeping those secrets secure. The people have the right to be well-governed. They have interests as well as rights, and it's the responsibility of the legislature to take every possible step to support those interests. Discussing the government's secret dealings publicly would likely risk the public interest and leave the government without crucial foreign information. Later, the rule was changed to allow the House the discretion to discuss a confidential message either in private or public.

Among the resolutions reported from the committee of the whole house on this occasion, was one for appointing a committee to report the naval force which would be necessary for the protection of the commerce of the United States against the Algerine corsairs, together with an estimate of the expense. It was moved to amend this resolution by adding, "and the ways and means for defraying the same." This motion revived the old party question of calling on the secretary of the treasury to report ways and means. The amendment was carried, Ayes 46. Noes 44.

Among the resolutions reported from the committee of the whole house on this occasion was one to appoint a committee that would report on the naval strength needed to protect U.S. commerce from the Algerian pirates, along with an estimate of the costs. A motion was made to amend this resolution by adding, "and the ways and means to cover these costs." This motion brought back the old party debate about requiring the secretary of the treasury to report on funding options. The amendment passed, Ayes 46. Noes 44.


NOTE—No. VIII. See Page 147.

The private correspondence of Mr. Morris with the president exhibits a faithful picture, drawn by the hand of a master, of the shifting revolutionary scenes which with unparalleled rapidity succeeded each other in Paris. With the eye of an intelligent, and of an unimpassioned observer, he marked all passing events, and communicated them with fidelity. He did not mistake despotism for freedom, because it was sanguinary, because it was exercised by those who denominated themselves the people, or because it assumed the name of liberty. Sincerely wishing happiness and a really free government to France, he could not be blind to the obvious truth that the road to those blessings had been mistaken. It was expected by his enemies that the correspondence which was asked for would disclose something which might be deemed offensive to the rulers of the republic, and consequently furnish additional matter for charging the administration with unfriendliness to France.

The private letters of Mr. Morris to the president provide an accurate depiction, crafted by a skilled hand, of the rapidly changing revolutionary events happening in Paris. As an observant and unbiased watcher, he noted all significant occurrences and reported them faithfully. He didn’t confuse oppression with freedom just because it was violent, or because it was carried out by those calling themselves the people, or because it was labeled as liberty. While he genuinely hoped for happiness and a truly free government for France, he couldn’t overlook the clear truth that the path to those ideals had been misguided. His enemies expected that the correspondence they sought would reveal something that could be seen as critical of the rulers of the republic, and therefore provide more grounds to accuse the administration of being unfriendly to France.

The resolution requesting all the correspondence, not even excluding that which the president might think proper to withhold, involved considerations of some delicacy, respecting which it was proper that the rights of the executive should be precisely understood. It was, therefore, laid before the cabinet, and, in conformity with their advice, the President sent a message to the senate informing them that he had examined the correspondence they requested, and had caused it to be copied, except in those particulars which in his judgment, for public considerations, ought not to be communicated; which copies he transmitted to them. The nature of these papers, he added, manifested the propriety of their being received as confidential.

The resolution asking for all the correspondence, even including any that the president might think it necessary to withhold, involved some sensitive issues regarding the executive's rights that needed to be clearly understood. So, it was presented to the cabinet, and following their advice, the President sent a message to the Senate informing them that he had reviewed the requested correspondence and had arranged for it to be copied, except for certain parts that he felt should not be shared for public reasons; he sent those copies to them. He added that the nature of these documents indicated they should be treated as confidential.


NOTE—No. IX. See Page 164.

This opinion derived fresh confirmation from a notification transmitted in August, 1794, by the governor of Upper Canada to Captain Williamson, who was establishing a settlement on the Great Sodus, a bay of lake Ontario, about twenty miles from Oswego, and within the state of New York. Captain Williamson not being at the place, Lieutenant Sheaff, the bearer of the message, addressed a letter to him, in which he said, that he had come with instructions from the lieutenant governor of Upper Canada to demand by what authority an establishment had been ordered at that place, and to require that such a design be immediately relinquished for the reasons stated in the written declaration accompanying the letter.

This opinion received new confirmation from a notice sent in August 1794 by the governor of Upper Canada to Captain Williamson, who was setting up a settlement at Great Sodus, a bay on Lake Ontario, about twenty miles from Oswego, in New York State. Since Captain Williamson was not there, Lieutenant Sheaff, who carried the message, wrote him a letter stating that he had come with instructions from the lieutenant governor of Upper Canada to ask by what authority the establishment had been ordered at that location and to demand that the plan be abandoned immediately for the reasons outlined in the written statement included with the letter.

The written declaration was in these words:

The statement said:

"I am commanded to declare that, during the inexecution of the treaty of peace between Great Britain and the United States, and until the existing differences respecting it shall be mutually and finally adjusted, the taking possession of any part of the Indian territory, either for the purposes of war or sovereignty, is held to be a direct violation of his Britannic majesty's rights, as they unquestionably existed before the treaty, and has an immediate tendency to interrupt, and in its progress to destroy that good understanding which has hitherto subsisted between his Britannic majesty and the United States of America. I, therefore, require you to desist from any such aggression."

"I am instructed to announce that, during the failure to implement the peace treaty between Great Britain and the United States, and until the ongoing issues related to it are fully resolved, taking possession of any part of the Indian territory, whether for war or sovereignty purposes, is considered a direct violation of the rights of His Britannic Majesty, as those rights clearly existed before the treaty. This action could immediately disrupt and ultimately destroy the good relations that have previously existed between His Britannic Majesty and the United States of America. Therefore, I ask you to stop any such aggression."

In the same spirit, complaints had been made as early as 1792, of encroachments made by the people of Vermont on a country confessedly within the territorial line of the United States, but inhabited by persons said to live under the protection of the British garrisons.

In the same spirit, complaints had been raised as early as 1792 about encroachments by the people of Vermont on land that was clearly within the territorial boundaries of the United States, but inhabited by individuals who were said to be living under the protection of British troops.


NOTE—No. X. See Page 205.

On receiving the resignation of the secretary, the President addressed a letter to him expressive of the sense he entertained of his services. This letter is not found in the letter book, but its purport may be collected from the following answer.

After getting the secretary's resignation, the President wrote him a letter expressing his appreciation for his work. This letter isn't in the letter book, but you can figure out its meaning from the following response.

Philadelphia, February 3d, 1795.

Philadelphia, February 3, 1795.

"Sir,—My particular acknowledgments are due for your very kind letter of yesterday. As often as I may recall the vexations I have endured, your approbation will be a great and precious consolation.

"Mr.,—I truly appreciate your kind letter from yesterday. No matter how many times I think about the frustrations I've faced, your approval brings me great comfort."

"It was not without a struggle that I yielded to the very urgent motives which impelled me to relinquish a station in which I could hope to be in any degree instrumental in promoting the success of an administration under your direction; a struggle which would have been far greater had I supposed that the prospect of future usefulness was proportioned to the sacrifices to be made.

"It wasn't easy for me to give in to the strong reasons that pushed me to leave a position where I could hope to contribute to the success of an administration led by you; it would have been even harder if I thought that the chance of being useful in the future was related to the sacrifices I had to make."

"Whatever may be my destination hereafter, I entreat you to be persuaded (not the less for my having been sparing in professions) that I shall never cease to render a just tribute to those eminent and excelling qualities which have been already productive of so many blessings to your country—that you will always have my fervent wishes for your public and personal felicity, and that it will be my pride to cultivate a continuance of that esteem, regard and friendship, of which you do me the honour to assure me."

"Whatever my future holds, I ask you to believe (even though I might not express it often) that I will never stop acknowledging the remarkable qualities that have already brought so many blessings to your country—that you will always have my heartfelt wishes for your success and happiness, and that it will bring me pride to maintain the respect, regard, and friendship that you have honored me with."


NOTE—No. XI. See Page 216.

The following toasts which were given at a civic feast in Philadelphia on the first of May, attended by a great number of American citizens, to celebrate the victories of France, and which was honoured by the presence of the minister and consul of the French republic, and of the consul of Holland, then subdued by the arms of France, will furnish some idea of the prevailing spirit of the times.

The following toasts were given at a civic feast in Philadelphia on May 1st, attended by many American citizens, to celebrate France's victories. The event was honored by the presence of the minister and consul of the French republic, as well as the consul of Holland, which at the time was under French control, providing a glimpse into the prevailing spirit of the era.

1st. The republic of France; whose triumphs have made this day a jubilee; may she destroy the race of kings, and may their broken sceptres and crowns, like the bones and teeth of the Mammoth, be the only evidences that such monsters ever infested the earth.

1st. The Republic of France, whose victories have made today a celebration, may she eliminate the monarchy, and may their shattered scepters and crowns, like the bones and teeth of the Mammoth, be the only proof that such tyrants ever plagued the earth.

2d. The republic of France; may the shores of Great Britain soon hail the tricoloured standard, and the people rend the air with shouts of long live the republic.

2d. The Republic of France; may the shores of Great Britain soon welcome the tricolor flag, and the people fill the air with cheers of long live the republic.

3d. The republic of France; may her navy clear the ocean of pirates, that the common highway of nations may no longer, like the highways of Great Britain, be a receptacle for robbers.

3d. The Republic of France; may her navy cleanse the ocean of pirates, so that the common route of nations may no longer, like the roads of Great Britain, be a haven for criminals.

4th. The republic of France; may all free nations learn of her to transfer their attachment from men to principles, and from individuals to the people.

4th. The republic of France; may all free nations learn from her to shift their loyalty from individuals to principles, and from people to the collective.

5th. The republic of France; may her example in the abolition of titles and splendour be a lesson to all republics to destroy those leavens of corruption.

5th. The republic of France; may her example in eliminating titles and grandeur serve as a lesson to all republics to eradicate those sources of corruption.

6th. The republic of Holland; may the flame of liberty which they have rekindled never be permitted to expire for want of vigilance and energy.

6th. The Republic of Holland; may the flame of liberty they have reignited never be allowed to go out due to a lack of vigilance and energy.

7th. The republic of Holland; may her two sisters, the republics of France and America, form with her an invincible triumvirate in the cause of liberty.

7th. The Republic of Holland; may her two sisters, the Republics of France and America, unite with her to create an unstoppable alliance in the fight for freedom.

8th. The republic of Holland; may she again give birth to a Van Tromp and De Ruyter, who shall make the satellites of George tremble at their approach, and seek their safety in flight.

8th. The republic of Holland; may she once again give rise to a Van Tromp and De Ruyter, who will make George's satellites tremble at their arrival and flee for their safety.

9th. The republic of Holland; may that fortitude which sustained her in the dire conflict with Philip II. and the success that crowned her struggles, be multiplied upon her, in the hour of her regeneration.

9th. The Republic of Holland; may the strength that supported her during the fierce battle with Philip II. and the victories that rewarded her efforts be increased upon her in her time of renewal.

10th. The republic of Holland; may that government which they are about establishing have neither the balances of aristocracy, nor the checks of monarchy.

10th. The Republic of Holland; may the government they are about to establish have neither the restraints of aristocracy nor the controls of monarchy.

11th. The republic of America; may the sentiment that impelled her to resist a British tyrant's will, and the energy which rendered it effectual, prompt her to repel usurpation in whatever shape it may assail her.

11th. The republic of America; may the feeling that drove her to resist a British tyrant's wishes, and the strength that made it successful, encourage her to fight against any form of oppression that tries to confront her.

12th. The republic of America; may the aristocracy of wealth founded upon the virtues, the toils, and the blood of her revolutionary armies soon vanish, and like the baseless fabric of a vision, leave not a wreck behind.

12th. The republic of America; may the elite class built on the virtues, efforts, and sacrifices of her revolutionary armies quickly disappear, and like an illusion, leave no trace behind.

13th. The republic of America; may her government have public good for its object, and be purged of the dregs of sophisticated republicanism.

13th. The republic of America; may its government focus on the public good and be free from the impurities of complicated republicanism.

14th. The republic of America; may the alliance formed between her and France acquire vigour with age, and that man be branded as the enemy of liberty who shall endeavour to weaken or unhinge it.

14th. The republic of America; may the partnership with France grow stronger over time, and let anyone who tries to weaken or disrupt it be seen as an enemy of liberty.

15th. The republic of America; may her administration have virtue enough to defy the ordeal of patriotic societies, and patriotism enough to cherish instead of denouncing them.

15th. The republic of America; may her government have the integrity to withstand the challenges of patriotic groups, and the love for her country to support rather than criticize them.

It was not in Philadelphia alone that this temper was manifested. In every part of the United States, the love of France appeared to be a passion much more active with immense numbers, than that of America. Her victories were celebrated with enthusiasm, her heroes were toasted on public occasions, and moderation with regard to England was deemed a crime not readily to be pardoned.

It wasn't just in Philadelphia that this attitude showed itself. Across the entire United States, the love for France seemed to be a much stronger passion for many people than the love for America. Her victories were celebrated with excitement, her heroes were honored at public events, and being moderate towards England was seen as a serious offense that wasn't easily forgiven.

General Washington received an invitation to attend this feast in the following terms.

General Washington got an invitation to attend this feast with the following wording.

Sir,—The subscribers, a committee in behalf of a number of American, French, and Dutch citizens, request the honour of your company to a civic festival, to be given on Friday, April 17th, appointed to celebrate the late victories of the French republic, and the emancipation of Holland.

Man,—The subscribers, a committee representing several American, French, and Dutch citizens, invite you to join us for a civic festival on Friday, April 17th, to celebrate the recent victories of the French Republic and the liberation of Holland.


NOTE—No. XII. See Page 231.

A letter addressed to his government in October, 1794, by the minister of the French republic was intercepted by the captain of a British frigate and forwarded to Mr. Hammond, by whom it was delivered about the last of July to the secretary of the treasury, who, on the arrival of the President in Philadelphia, placed it in his hands. This letter alluded to communications from Mr. Randolph which, in the opinion of the President, were excessively improper. The ecclaircissements which the occasion required were followed by the resignation of the secretary. For the purpose, he alleged, of vindicating his conduct, he demanded a sight of a confidential letter which had been addressed to him by the President, and which was left in the office. His avowed design was to give this as well as some others of the same description to the public in order to support the allegation, that in consequence of his attachment to France and to liberty, he had fallen a victim to the intrigues of a British and an aristocratic party. The answer given to this demand was a license which few politicians in turbulent times could allow to a man who had possessed the unlimited confidence of the person giving it. "I have directed," said the President, "that you should have the inspection of my letter of the 22d of July, agreeable to your request: and you are at full liberty to publish without reserve any and every private and confidential letter I ever wrote you: nay more—every word I ever uttered to or in your presence, from whence you can derive any advantage in your vindication."

A letter sent to his government in October 1794 by the minister of the French republic was intercepted by the captain of a British frigate and forwarded to Mr. Hammond, who then delivered it to the secretary of the treasury around the end of July. When the President arrived in Philadelphia, he handed it over to him. This letter referred to communications from Mr. Randolph that the President considered extremely inappropriate. The clarifications needed led to the secretary's resignation. He claimed that in order to defend his actions, he wanted to see a confidential letter the President had sent him, which was left in the office. His stated intention was to make this and other similar letters public to support his claim that, due to his loyalty to France and liberty, he had fallen victim to the schemes of a British and aristocratic faction. The response to this request was a concession that few politicians in chaotic times would grant to someone who had enjoyed the complete trust of the one offering it. "I have directed," said the President, "that you should have access to my letter of July 22, as you requested: and you are completely free to publish without hesitation any and every private and confidential letter I ever wrote to you: furthermore—every word I ever spoke to or in your presence that you can use to support your defense."

As the asperity with which Mr. Randolph spoke of the President on other occasions as well as in his vindication, was censured by many, it may rescue the reputation of that gentleman from imputations which might be injurious to it to say that, some time before his death, he had the magnanimity to acknowledge the injustice of those imputations. A letter to the honourable Bushrod Washington, of July 2d, 1810, a copy of which was transmitted by Mr. Randolph to the author, contains the following declarations among others of similar import. "I do not retain the smallest degree of that feeling which roused me fifteen years ago against some individuals. For the world contains no treasure, deception, or charm which can seduce me from the consolation of being in a state of good will towards all mankind; and I should not be mortified to ask pardon of any man with whom I have been at variance for any injury which I may have done him. If I could now present myself before your venerated uncle, it would be my pride to confess my contrition that I suffered my irritation, let the cause be what it might, to use some of those expressions respecting him which, at this moment of my indifference to the ideas of the world, I wish to recall, as being inconsistent with my subsequent conviction. My life will I hope be sufficiently extended for the recording of my sincere opinion of his virtues and merit, in a style which is not the result of a mind merely debilitated by misfortune, but of that Christian philosophy on which alone I depend for inward tranquillity."

As the harsh way Mr. Randolph spoke about the President on various occasions, including in his defense, was criticized by many, it helps to clear that gentleman's name from accusations that could harm it to mention that, some time before his death, he had the generosity to recognize the unfairness of those accusations. A letter to the honorable Bushrod Washington, dated July 2, 1810, a copy of which was sent by Mr. Randolph to the author, includes the following statements among others with a similar meaning. "I no longer hold the slightest bit of the feelings that stirred me fifteen years ago against certain individuals. For there is no treasure, deceit, or charm in the world that could lure me away from the comfort of maintaining goodwill towards all humanity; and I would not feel embarrassed to ask for forgiveness from anyone I’ve had disagreements with for any harm I may have caused them. If I could now stand before your respected uncle, it would be my honor to admit my regret for allowing my frustration, whatever the reason, to lead me to use some of those words about him that, at this moment when I am indifferent to the world’s opinions, I want to take back, as they don’t align with my later beliefs. I hope my life will be long enough to share my genuine views on his virtues and worthiness, in a way that reflects not just a mind weakened by misfortune, but that Christian philosophy on which I rely for my inner peace.”


NOTE—No. XIII. See Page 231.

This place was offered to Mr. Henry, a gentleman of eminent talents, great influence, and commanding eloquence. He had led the opposition to the constitution in Virginia, but, after its adoption, his hostility had in some measure subsided. He was truly a personal friend of the President, and had lately manifested a temper not inimical to the administration. The chief magistrate was anxious to engage him in the public service, but was aware of the embarrassments which must result from placing in so confidential a station, a person whose opinions might lead him to thwart every measure of the executive. It was, therefore, necessary to come to some explanations with Mr. Henry on this subject, and the letter which invited him into the department of state opened the way for this explanation by stating truly the views and character of the administration. "I persuade myself, sir," said the President, "it has not escaped your observation, that a crisis is approaching which must, if it can not be arrested, soon decide whether order and good government shall be preserved, or anarchy and confusion ensue. I can most religiously aver that I have no wish incompatible with the dignity, happiness, and true interests of the people of this country. My ardent desire is, and my aim has been (as far as depended upon the executive department) to comply strictly with all our foreign and domestic engagements; but to keep the United States free from political connexions with every other country;—to see them independent of all, and under the influence of none. In a word, I want an American character; that the powers of Europe may be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others. This, in my judgment, is the only way to be respected abroad, and happy at home; and not by becoming the partisans of Great Britain or France, create dissensions, disturb the public tranquillity, and destroy, perhaps forever, the cement that binds the union.

This position was offered to Mr. Henry, a man of outstanding abilities, significant influence, and impressive speaking skills. He had led the opposition to the constitution in Virginia, but after its acceptance, his opposition had somewhat eased. He was genuinely a personal friend of the President and had recently shown a more favorable attitude toward the administration. The President was eager to involve him in public service but recognized the challenges that would arise from placing someone in such a confidential role whose opinions could potentially obstruct the executive's plans. Therefore, it was important to clarify things with Mr. Henry on this matter, and the letter inviting him to the Department of State set the stage for this discussion by accurately expressing the administration's views and character. "I believe, sir," said the President, "that you have noticed a crisis is coming that, unless we can stop it, will soon determine whether order and good governance will be maintained or whether chaos and confusion will follow. I can honestly say that I have no goals that conflict with the dignity, happiness, and true interests of the people of this country. My strong desire is, and my aim has been (as far as the executive branch can control), to strictly honor all our foreign and domestic commitments; but to keep the United States free from political ties with every other country;—to ensure they are independent of all, and under the influence of none. In short, I want an American identity; for the powers of Europe to be convinced we act for ourselves and not for others. This, in my opinion, is the only way to earn respect abroad and maintain happiness at home; and not by becoming supporters of Great Britain or France, which would create divisions, disrupt public peace, and potentially destroy the bond that holds our union together forever."

"I am satisfied these sentiments can not be otherwise than congenial to your own. Your aid, therefore, in carrying them into effect would be flattering and pleasing to me."

"I’m sure these feelings are just as harmonious with yours. Your support in making them happen would be both flattering and enjoyable for me."

This accurate chart of the road he was invited to travel, presented in itself no impediments which to Mr. Henry appeared insurmountable. By private considerations alone was he restrained from proceeding in it.

This accurate map of the road he was invited to travel posed no obstacles that Mr. Henry saw as impossible to overcome. He was only held back by personal reasons from moving forward on it.


NOTE—No. XIV. See Page 272.

The course of the war in Europe had brought the two parties into opposition on a point on which no difference had originally existed between them, which gave more countenance to the charge that the advocates of the American government were unfriendly to France than it could justly claim when first made. Those who in 1793 had supported the proclamation of neutrality, and the whole system connected with it, were then, generally speaking, ardent and sincere in their wishes for the success of the French arms. But as the troops of the republic subdued Belgium and Holland; as they conquered Italy, and established the complete influence of France over the monarchy of Spain, this union of sentiment gradually disappeared. By one party it was contended that America could feel no interest in seeing Europe subjected to any one power. That to such a power, the Atlantic would afford no impassable barriers; and that no form of government was a security against national ambition. They, therefore, wished this series of victories to be interrupted; and that the balance of Europe should not be absolutely overturned. Additional strength was undoubtedly given to this course of reasoning by the aggressions of France on the United States.

The course of the war in Europe had led to a clash between the two parties over a point that originally had no differences between them, which made the claim that supporters of the American government were against France seem more valid than it should have when it was first made. Those who, in 1793, had backed the proclamation of neutrality and the entire system that went with it were generally eager and genuine in their hopes for the success of the French military. However, as the republic's troops took control of Belgium and Holland, conquered Italy, and secured complete influence over the Spanish monarchy, this shared sentiment slowly faded away. One party argued that America had no stake in seeing Europe dominated by any single power. They believed that such a power would find no impenetrable barriers in the Atlantic and that no type of government could guarantee immunity from national ambition. Therefore, they wanted this chain of victories to be interrupted and for the balance of power in Europe not to be completely disrupted. The aggressions of France toward the United States undoubtedly reinforced this line of reasoning.

In the opinion of the opposite party, the triumphs of France were the triumphs of liberty. In their view every nation which was subdued, was a nation liberated from oppression. The fears of danger to the United States from the further aggrandizement of a single power were treated as chimerical, because that power being a republic must, consequently, be the friend of republics in every part of the globe, and a stranger to that lust of domination which was the characteristic passion of monarchies. Shifting with address the sentiment really avowed by their opponents, they ridiculed a solicitude for the existence of a balance of power in Europe, as an opinion that America ought to embark herself in the crusade of kings against France in order to preserve that balance.

In the view of the opposing party, France's victories represented the victories of freedom. They believed that every nation that was conquered was actually liberated from oppression. Concerns about the potential threat to the United States from the expansion of a single power were dismissed as unrealistic because that power, being a republic, must therefore be an ally of republics everywhere and not driven by the desire for domination, which is typical of monarchies. Skillfully shifting the sentiment openly expressed by their opponents, they mocked the concern for maintaining a balance of power in Europe, suggesting it implied that America should join the kings' crusade against France to uphold that balance.


NOTE—No. XV. See Page 326.

The following extract from a letter written to General Knox the day before the termination of his office, exhibits the sentiments with which he contemplated this event, and with which he viewed the unceasing calumnies with which his whole administration continued to be aspersed.

The following extract from a letter written to General Knox the day before he left office shows how he felt about this event and how he viewed the constant attacks that continued to be directed at his entire administration.

"To the wearied traveller who sees a resting place, and is bending his body to lean thereon, I now compare myself; but to be suffered to do this in peace, is too much to be endured by some. To misrepresent my motives; to reprobate my politics; and to weaken the confidence which has been reposed in my administration;—are objects which can not be relinquished by those who will be satisfied with nothing short of a change in our political system. The consolation, however, which results from conscious rectitude, and the approving voice of my country unequivocally expressed by its representatives—deprives their sting of its poison, and places in the same point of view both the weakness and the malignity of their efforts.

"To the exhausted traveler who sees a place to rest and leans towards it, I now compare myself; but being allowed to do this in peace is too much for some to handle. Misrepresenting my motives, criticizing my politics, and undermining the trust that has been placed in my leadership are goals that those who demand nothing less than a change in our political system won't give up. However, the comfort that comes from knowing I’ve done the right thing and the clear support of my country, expressed through its representatives, dilutes their attacks and puts both the weakness and the malice of their efforts into perspective."

"Although the prospect of retirement is most grateful to my soul, and I have not a wish to mix again in the great world, or to partake in its politics, yet I am not without my regrets at parting with (perhaps never more to meet) the few intimates whom I love. Among these, be assured you are one."

"Even though the idea of retirement brings me a lot of joy, and I have no desire to reenter the busy world or get involved in its politics, I do have some regrets about saying goodbye to the few close friends I truly care about (and perhaps never seeing them again). You can be sure that you are one of those friends."


NOTE—No. XVI. See Page 329.

In the speech delivered by the President on taking the oaths of office, after some judicious observations on the constitution of his country, and on the dangers to which it was exposed, that able statesman thus spoke of his predecessor.

In the speech given by the President upon taking the oath of office, after some thoughtful comments on the constitution of his country and the threats it faced, that skilled leader spoke about his predecessor.

"Such is the amiable and interesting system of government (and such are some of the abuses to which it may be exposed) which the people of America have exhibited, to the admiration and anxiety of the wise and virtuous of all nations, for eight years, under the administration of a citizen, who, by a long course of great actions, regulated by prudence, justice, temperance and fortitude, conducting a people inspired with the same virtues, and animated with the same ardent patriotism and love of liberty, to independence and peace, to increasing wealth and unexampled prosperity, has merited the gratitude of his fellow-citizens, commanded the highest praises of foreign nations, and secured immortal glory with posterity.

"Such is the friendly and engaging system of government (and such are some of the issues it may face) that the people of America have demonstrated, to the admiration and concern of the wise and virtuous from all nations, for eight years, under the leadership of a citizen who, through a long history of great deeds guided by common sense, fairness, moderation, and courage, has led a people inspired by the same values and driven by the same passionate patriotism and love of freedom, towards independence and peace, growing wealth and unmatched prosperity, earning the gratitude of his fellow citizens, receiving high praise from foreign nations, and ensuring everlasting glory for future generations."

"In that retirement which is his voluntary choice, may he long live to enjoy the delicious recollection of his services, the gratitude of mankind, the happy fruits of them to himself and the world, which are daily increasing, and that splendid prospect of the future fortunes of his country which is opening from year to year. His name may be still a rampart, and the knowledge that he lives a bulwark against all open or secret enemies of his country's peace."

"In that retirement he has chosen for himself, may he long enjoy the satisfying memories of his contributions, the gratitude of people, and the positive outcomes they bring to him and the world, which are growing daily. May he also witness the promising future of his country that unfolds year after year. His name may still serve as a shield, and the knowledge that he is alive stands strong against all open or hidden threats to his country's peace."


NOTE—No. XVII. See Page 330.

To testify their love for the person who had for eight years administered the government of the United States, the merchants of Philadelphia had prepared a splendid banquet for the day, to which the general, several officers of rank in the late army, the heads of departments, foreign ministers, and other persons of distinction were invited.

To show their love for the person who had led the government of the United States for eight years, the merchants of Philadelphia organized a lavish banquet for the day, inviting the general, several high-ranking officers from the recent army, department heads, foreign ministers, and other notable guests.

In the rotundo in which it was given, an elegant compliment was prepared for the principal guest, which is thus described in the papers of the day.

In the round hall where it took place, a stylish compliment was ready for the main guest, which is detailed in the newspapers of the time.

"Upon entering the area the general was conducted to his seat. On a signal given, music played Washington's march, and a scene which represented simple objects in the rear of the principal seat was drawn up, and discovered emblematical painting.

"Upon entering the area, the general was shown to his seat. At a given signal, music played Washington's march, and a backdrop featuring simple objects behind the main seat was unveiled, revealing an emblematical painting."

"The principal was a female figure large as life, representing America, seated on an elevation composed of sixteen marble steps. At her left side, stood the federal shield and eagle, and at her feet, lay the cornucopia; in her right hand, she held the Indian calumet of peace supporting the cap of liberty: in the perspective appeared the temple of fame; and on her left hand, an altar dedicated to public gratitude, upon which incense was burning. In her left hand she held a scroll inscribed valedictory; and at the foot of the altar lay a plumed helmet and sword, from which a figure of General Washington, large as life, appeared, retiring down the steps, pointing with his right hand to the emblems of power which he had resigned, and with his left to a beautiful landscape representing Mount Vernon, in front of which oxen were seen harnessed to the plough. Over the general appeared a Genius placing a wreath of laurels on his head."

"The principal was a larger-than-life female figure representing America, seated on an elevation made up of sixteen marble steps. To her left stood the federal shield and eagle, and at her feet lay the cornucopia; in her right hand, she held the Indian peace pipe supporting the cap of liberty. In the background, there was the temple of fame; on her left was an altar dedicated to public gratitude, with incense burning. In her left hand, she held a scroll labeled 'farewell'; at the foot of the altar lay a plumed helmet and sword, from which a life-sized figure of General Washington appeared, walking down the steps, pointing with his right hand to the symbols of power he had given up, and with his left to a beautiful landscape of Mount Vernon, where oxen were seen hitched to the plow. Above the general, a Genius placed a wreath of laurels on his head."


NOTE—No. XVIII. See Page 348.

(All footnotes on pages covered by Note No. XVIII are references to the correspondence of Thomas Jefferson.)

(All footnotes on pages covered by Note No. XVIII are references to the letters of Thomas Jefferson.)

A letter from Mr. Jefferson to Mr. Mazzei, an Italian who had passed some time in the United States, was published in Florence, and republished in the Moniteur, with some severe strictures on the conduct of the United States, and a remark "that the French government had testified its resentment by breaking off communication with an ungrateful and faithless ally until she shall return to a more just and benevolent conduct. No doubt," adds the editor, "it will give rise in the United States to discussions which may afford a triumph to the party of good republicans, the friends of France.

A letter from Mr. Jefferson to Mr. Mazzei, an Italian who had spent some time in the United States, was published in Florence and then republished in the Moniteur, containing harsh criticisms of the United States' actions, as well as a comment that "the French government expressed its anger by cutting off communication with an ungrateful and untrustworthy ally until it adopts a fairer and kinder approach. No doubt," the editor adds, "this will spark conversations in the United States that could lead to a victory for the good republican party, the supporters of France."

"Some writers, in disapprobation of this wise and necessary measure of the Directory, maintain that, in the United States, the French have for partisans only certain demagogues who aim to overthrow the existing government. But their impudent falsehoods convince no one, and prove only, what is too evident, that they use the liberty of the press to serve the enemies of France."

"Some writers, criticizing this wise and necessary action by the Directory, argue that in the United States, the French only have support from certain demagogues looking to overthrow the current government. However, their brazen lies convince no one and only demonstrate, as is all too clear, that they are using the freedom of the press to aid the enemies of France."

Mr. Jefferson, in his correspondence,[59] has animadverted on the preceding note with such extreme bitterness, as to impose on its author the necessity of entering into some explanations. Censure from a gentleman who has long maintained an unexampled ascendency over public opinion, can not be entirely disregarded.

Mr. Jefferson, in his correspondence,[59] has criticized the previous note with such intensity that the author now feels the need to provide some explanations. Criticism from a gentleman who has long held a remarkable influence over public opinion cannot be completely ignored.

The offence consists in the reference to the letter written by him to Mr. Mazzei, which was published in Florence, and republished in Paris by the editor of the Moniteur, then the official paper of the Directory. In this letter, Mr. Jefferson says, a paragraph was interpolated which makes him charge his own country with ingratitude and injustice to France.

The offense is in the reference to the letter he wrote to Mr. Mazzei, which was published in Florence and republished in Paris by the editor of the Moniteur, then the official newspaper of the Directory. In this letter, Mr. Jefferson states that a paragraph was added that makes him accuse his own country of ingratitude and injustice towards France.

By the word "country," Mr. Jefferson is understood to allude to the government, not to the people of America.

By the term "country," Mr. Jefferson is understood to refer to the government, not to the people of America.

This letter, containing the sentence now alleged to be interpolated, was published throughout the United States in the summer of 1797. It became immediately, as may well be supposed, the subject of universal conversation. The writer, and the individual to whom it particularly alludes, filled too large a space in the public mind for such a paper not to excite general attention and deep interest. It did excite both.

This letter, which includes the sentence now claimed to be added later, was published across the United States in the summer of 1797. As one might expect, it quickly became the topic of widespread discussion. The writer and the person it specifically refers to occupied such a significant place in the public's thoughts that the letter couldn't help but grab overall attention and spark a lot of interest. It certainly did both.

Had it been fabricated, Mr. Jefferson, it was supposed, could not have permitted it to remain uncontradicted. It came in a form too authentic, the matter it contained affected his own reputation and that of the illustrious individual who is its principal subject, too vitally to permit the imputation to remain unnoticed. It would not, it could not have remained unnoticed, if untrue. Yet its genuineness was never questioned by Mr. Jefferson, or by any of his numerous friends. Not even to General Washington, as is now avowed, was it ever denied. Had it been denied to him, his strong sense of justice and of right would have compelled him to relieve the reputation of the supposed writer from a charge of such serious import.

If it had been fake, Mr. Jefferson would not have allowed it to go unchallenged. It came in a form that was too credible, and the content impacted both his own reputation and that of the prominent person at the center of it, too significantly to let the accusation go unnoticed. It would not have remained unnoticed if it were false. Yet, Mr. Jefferson and his many friends never questioned its authenticity. Even General Washington was never told otherwise, as is now acknowledged. If it had been denied to him, his strong sense of justice would have forced him to clear the supposed writer's name from such a serious allegation.

It was, of course, universally received as a genuine letter. An open avowal of it could not have added to the general conviction.

It was, of course, accepted by everyone as a real letter. A public admission of it couldn’t have strengthened the widespread belief.

The letter having this irresistible claim on the general confidence, no one part of it was entitled to less credit than every other. The interpolation of a particular sentence was neither suggested nor suspected. The whole was published in Europe and republished in America as the letter of Mr. Jefferson, with his name subscribed. The genuineness of no part of it was ever called into question. How then could the public or any individual have ventured to select a particular sentence, and to say—this is spurious?

The letter had this undeniable appeal to the public’s trust, so no part of it deserved less credibility than any other. No one suggested or suspected that a specific sentence had been added. It was published in Europe and reprinted in America as a letter from Mr. Jefferson, with his name signed. No part of its authenticity was ever questioned. So how could the public or any person have dared to pick out a particular sentence and claim—this is fake?

Had it been suggested by Mr. Jefferson or his confidential friends that the letter was in general his, but that one sentence was fabricated, there is not perhaps an individual in the United States who would have pointed to that which censured the conduct of our government towards France, as the fabricated sentence. That which placed the then chief magistrate at the head of the "Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical party which had sprung up," would have been much more probably selected. This conjecture is hazarded because, at the date of the letter,[60] Mr. Jefferson shared the confidence of General Washington, and was on terms of intimate professed friendship with him; while his censures of the conduct of the United States towards France were open and unreserved. The sentence there said to be interpolated would, if really written by him, have involved no imputation on his sincerity,—would have consisted perfectly with his general declarations. These declarations were so notorious, especially after the mission of Mr. Jay to Great Britain, and the reception of the treaty negotiated by him, that there was perhaps not an individual in the United States, at all conversant with public affairs, to whom they were unknown. Without reference to other proofs, sufficient evidence of this fact is furnished by that portion of his correspondence which has been selected for publication. Some examples will be quoted.

If Mr. Jefferson or his close associates had suggested that the letter was mostly his but contained one made-up sentence, it’s likely that no one in the United States would have pointed to the part that criticized our government's actions toward France as the fake sentence. Instead, they would have probably identified the part that put the then-president at the head of the "Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical party that had emerged." This guess is made because, at the time the letter was written,[60] Mr. Jefferson had the trust of General Washington and maintained a close, professed friendship with him; meanwhile, his criticisms of the U.S. actions toward France were clear and open. The sentence claimed to be added would not have questioned his sincerity if he had actually written it—it would have aligned perfectly with his overall statements. These statements were so well-known, especially after Mr. Jay's mission to Great Britain and the reception of the treaty he negotiated, that probably no one in the United States who was aware of public matters was unaware of them. Without referencing other evidence, clear proof of this is provided by the portion of his correspondence that has been chosen for publication. Some examples will be noted.

In a letter of the 27th of April, 1795,[61] he says, "I sincerely congratulate you on the great prosperities of our two first allies, the French and the Dutch.[62] If I could but see them now at peace with the rest of their continent, I should have little doubt of dining with Pichegru in London next autumn; for I believe I should be tempted to leave my clover for a while, to go and hail the dawn of republicanism in that island."

In a letter dated April 27, 1795,[61] he writes, "I truly congratulate you on the significant successes of our two foremost allies, the French and the Dutch.[62] If only I could see them at peace with the rest of Europe, I would have little doubt about dining with Pichegru in London next autumn; I believe I would be tempted to leave my fields for a while to celebrate the dawn of republicanism on that island."

In a letter of September 21st, 1795,[63] after speaking of the discussions in the papers concerning the treaty, and alluding to the efforts made to give it effect as the boldest act of Hamilton and Jay to undermine the government, he says, "a bolder party stroke was never struck. For it certainly is an attempt by a party who find they have lost their majority in one branch of the legislature, to make a law by the aid of the other branch and of the executive, under colour of a treaty, which shall bind up the hands of the adverse branch from ever restraining the commerce of their patron nation."

In a letter from September 21, 1795,[63] after discussing the debates in the newspapers about the treaty and referencing the efforts to implement it as the most daring move by Hamilton and Jay to weaken the government, he states, "a more audacious party maneuver has never been made. It is clearly an attempt by a party that realizes it has lost its majority in one part of the legislature to create a law with the help of the other part and the executive, under the guise of a treaty, which will prevent the opposing branch from ever limiting the trade of their favored nation."

On the 30th of November, 1795,[64] he says, "I join with you in thinking the treaty an execrable thing." "I trust the popular branch of the legislature will disapprove of it, and thus rid us of this infamous act, which is really nothing more than an alliance between England and the Anglo men of this country, against the legislature and people of the United States."

On November 30, 1795,[64] he says, "I agree with you that the treaty is terrible." "I hope the people's representatives in the legislature will reject it, freeing us from this disgraceful act, which is really just an alliance between England and the Anglo population of this country against the legislature and the people of the United States."

On the 21st of December, 1795,[65] speaking of a contemporary member of the cabinet, he says, "The fact is that he has generally given his principles to the one party and his practice to the other, the oyster to one, and the shell to the other. Unfortunately, the shell was generally the lot of his friends, the French and Republicans, and the oyster of their antagonists."

On December 21, 1795,[65] talking about a current cabinet member, he states, "The truth is that he usually supports one party with his principles and the other with his actions, giving the oyster to one and the shell to the other. Sadly, his friends, the French and Republicans, usually ended up with the shell, while their opponents received the oyster."

On the 21st of March, 1796,[66] he says, "The British treaty has been formally at length laid before congress. All America is a tiptoe to see what the house of representatives will decide on it." Speaking of the right of the legislature to determine whether it shall go into effect or not, and of the vast importance of the determination, he adds, "It is fortunate that the first decision is to be made in a case so palpably atrocious as to have been predetermined by all America."

On March 21, 1796,[66] he says, "The British treaty has finally been presented to Congress. Everyone in America is on edge to see what the House of Representatives will decide about it." Discussing the legislature's right to decide whether it should take effect, and the huge importance of that decision, he adds, "It's lucky that the first decision is in a case so clearly outrageous that all of America has already made up its mind."

On the 27th of the same month he says,[67] "If you decide in favour of your right to refuse co-operation, I should wonder on what occasion it is to be used, if not in one, where the rights, the interest, the honour and faith of our nation are so grossly sacrificed; where a faction has entered into a conspiracy with the enemies of their country to chain down the legislature at the feet of both; where the whole mass of your constituents have condemned the work in the most unequivocal manner, and are looking to you as their last hope to save them from the effects of the avarice and corruption of the first agent, the revolutionary machinations of others, and the incomprehensible acquiescence of the only honest man who has assented to it. I wish that his honesty and his political errors may not furnish a second occasion to exclaim, 'curse on his virtues, they have undone his country.'"

On the 27th of the same month he says,[67] "If you choose to exercise your right to refuse cooperation, I wonder when else it would be appropriate to do so, if not in a situation where the rights, interests, honor, and integrity of our nation are being so blatantly compromised; where a group has conspired with our country's enemies to undermine the legislature; where the majority of your constituents have strongly condemned this effort and are looking to you as their last hope to protect them from the greed and corruption of the primary instigator, the revolutionary plots of others, and the puzzling compliance of the only honest man who has agreed to it. I hope that his honesty and political mistakes won’t lead us to say once again, 'damn his virtues, they have ruined his country.'"

On the 12th of June, 1796,[68] he says, "Congress have risen. You will have seen by their proceedings what I always observed to you, that one man outweighs them all in influence over the people, who have supported his judgment against their own, and that of their representatives. Republicanism must lie on its oars, resign the vessel to its pilot, and themselves to the course he thinks best for them."

On June 12, 1796,[68] he states, "Congress has adjourned. You must have seen from their actions what I've always told you, that one person has more influence over the people than everyone else combined, who has backed his judgment over theirs and that of their representatives. Republicanism needs to take a backseat, handing over control to its leader, who believes he knows the best course for them."

On the 22d of January, 1797,[69] he says, "I sincerely deplore the situation of our affairs with France. War with them and consequent alliance with Great Britain will completely compass the object of the executive council from the commencement of the war between France and England; taken up by some of them from that moment; by others more latterly."

On January 22, 1797,[69] he says, "I truly regret our relationship with France. A war with them and a resulting alliance with Great Britain will fully achieve what the executive council has wanted since the start of the war between France and England; some have been pursuing this since that moment, while others joined in later."

On the 17th of June, 1797,[70] he says, "I have always hoped that the popularity of the late President being once withdrawn from active effect, the natural feelings of the people towards liberty would restore the equilibrium between the executive and legislative departments which had been destroyed by the superior weight and effect of that popularity; and that their natural feelings of moral obligation would discountenance the unnatural predilection of the executive in favour of Great Britain. But, unfortunately, the preceding measures had already alienated the nation who were the object of them, and the reaction has on the minds of our citizens an effect which supplies that of the Washington popularity.

On June 17, 1797,[70] he says, "I have always hoped that once the popularity of the late President faded, the people's natural feelings towards liberty would restore balance between the executive and legislative branches that had been disrupted by the overwhelming influence of that popularity. I expected their sense of moral obligation would discourage the executive's unfair favoritism towards Great Britain. Unfortunately, the previous actions had already turned the nation against those measures, and the resulting reaction has affected our citizens in a way that matches the impact of Washington's popularity."

"P.S. Since writing the above we have received a report that the French Directory has proposed a declaration of war against the United States to the Council of Ancients, who have rejected it. Thus we see two nations who love one another affectionately, brought by the ill temper of their executive administrations to the very brink of a necessity to imbrue their hands in the blood of each other."

"P.S. Since I wrote the above, we got a report that the French Directory has suggested declaring war on the United States to the Council of Ancients, but they rejected it. So we see two nations that care for each other deeply pushed to the brink of needing to spill each other's blood because of their government leaders' bad attitudes."

On the 14th of February, 1799,[71] he says, "The President has appointed, and the senate approved, Rufus King, to enter into a treaty of commerce with the Russians, at London, and William Smith (Phocion) envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary to go to Constantinople to make one with the Turks. So that as soon as there is a coalition of Turks, Russians, and English against France, we seize that moment to countenance it as openly as we dare, by treaties which we never had with them before. All this helps to fill up the measure of provocation towards France, and to get from them a declaration of war which we are afraid to be the first in making."

On February 14, 1799,[71] he says, "The President has appointed, and the Senate approved, Rufus King to negotiate a trade treaty with the Russians in London, and William Smith (Phocion) as envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary to go to Constantinople to make a treaty with the Turks. So that as soon as there’s a coalition of Turks, Russians, and the English against France, we will take that opportunity to support it as openly as we can, through treaties we’ve never had with them before. All this increases the provocation towards France and aims to elicit a declaration of war from them, which we are hesitant to initiate ourselves."

If these sentiments, in perfect coincidence with the pretensions of France, and censuring the neutral course of the American government, were openly avowed by Mr. Jefferson; if, when they appeared embodied in a letter addressed to a correspondent in Europe, and republished throughout the United States, they remained, even after becoming the topic of universal interest and universal excitement, totally uncontradicted, who could suspect that any one sentence, particularly that avowing a sentiment so often expressed by the writer, had been interpolated?

If these feelings, aligning perfectly with France's ambitions and criticizing the neutral stance of the American government, were clearly stated by Mr. Jefferson; if, when they were included in a letter sent to a contact in Europe and reprinted across the United States, they went unchallenged even after becoming a topic of widespread interest and excitement, who could doubt that any single sentence, especially one expressing a sentiment the writer had often shared, had been added in later?

Yet Mr. Jefferson, unmindful of these circumstances, after some acrimonious remarks on Colonel Pickering, has said,[72] "and even Judge Marshall makes history descend from its dignity, and the ermine from its sanctity, to exaggerate, to record, and to sanction this forgery."

Yet Mr. Jefferson, unaware of these circumstances, after making some harsh comments about Colonel Pickering, said,[72] "and even Judge Marshall lowers history's dignity, and the ermine's sanctity, to exaggerate, to document, and to approve this forgery."

The note itself will best demonstrate the inaccuracy of this commentary. To this text an appeal is fearlessly made.

The note itself will best show how inaccurate this commentary is. An appeal is made to this text without hesitation.

This unmerited invective is followed by an accusation not less extraordinary. It is made a cause of crimination that the author has copied the remark of the Parisian editor, instead of the letter itself.

This unjust criticism is followed by an equally surprising accusation. It's considered a reason for blame that the author quoted the Parisian editor's comment instead of the actual letter.

To remove this reproach, he will now insert the letter, not as published in Europe, and transferred from the French to the American papers, but as preserved and avowed by Mr. Jefferson, and given to the world by his grandson. It is in these words.

To clear this criticism, he will now include the letter, not as it was published in Europe and copied from the French into the American papers, but as kept and confirmed by Mr. Jefferson and shared with the world by his grandson. It reads as follows.

"Monticello, April 24th, 1796.[73]

Monticello, April 24, 1796.[73]

"My Dear Friend,

"My Beloved Friend,

"The aspect of our politics has wonderfully changed since you left us. In place of that noble love of liberty and republican government which carried us triumphantly through the war, an Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical party has sprung up, whose avowed object is to draw over us the substance as it has already done the forms of the British government. The main body of our citizens, however, remain true to their republican principles; the whole landed interest is republican, and so is a great mass of talents. Against us are the executive, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all the officers of the government, all who want to be officers, all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty, British merchants and Americans trading on British capitals, speculators and holders in the banks and public funds, a contrivance invented for the purposes of corruption, and for assimilating us in all things to the rotten as well as sound parts of the British model. It would give you a fever were I to name to you the apostates who have gone over to these heresies, men who were Samsons in the field and Solomons in council, but who have had their heads shorn by the harlot England. In short, we are likely to preserve the liberty we have obtained only by unremitting labours and perils. But we shall preserve it; and our mass of weight and wealth on the good side is so great as to leave no danger that force will ever be attempted against us. We have only to awake and snap the Lilliputian cords with which they have been entangling us during the first sleep which succeeded our labours.

"The state of our politics has changed dramatically since you left us. Instead of the noble love of freedom and republican government that saw us through the war, an Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratic party has emerged, whose main goal is to impose on us the substance of British government, just as they have already done with its forms. However, the majority of our citizens remain committed to their republican ideals; the entire landholding class is republican, and so is a large pool of talent. We face opposition from the executive branch, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all government officials, those who aspire to become officials, and all the cautious individuals who would rather choose the serenity of tyranny over the tumultuous sea of freedom—British merchants and Americans investing with British capital, speculators, and investors in banks and public funds, a system created for corrupt purposes that aligns us with both the rotten and sound parts of the British model. You would be shocked if I named the traitors who have aligned with these ideas—men who were once strong and wise leaders, but have had their resolve undermined by England. In short, we are likely to keep the freedom we have achieved only through constant effort and danger. But we will preserve it; our significant weight and wealth on the right side is so substantial that there's little chance anyone will ever attempt to use force against us. We just need to wake up and break the tiny chains with which they have been trying to bind us during the first peaceful moments after our hard work."

"I will forward the testimonials, &c."

"I will send the testimonials, etc."

The reader is requested to pause, to reflect on the state of things at the date of this letter, and to ask himself if its inevitable tendency be not to strengthen the impression in the Directory of France which had influenced its conduct towards the United States?—If it be not in the same spirit with the interpolated sentence, carried to a greater extreme, and calculated to produce the same effect?—If the editor who made the interpolation might not reasonably suppose that he was only applying expressly to France a sentiment already indicated in terms too plain to be misunderstood?

The reader is asked to take a moment to think about the situation as of the date of this letter and to consider whether its unavoidable tendency doesn't reinforce the impression that influenced the Directory of France in its dealings with the United States. Is it not in the same mindset as the added sentence, taken to a greater extreme and likely to create the same impact? Could the editor who made the addition reasonably believe that he was simply clarifying a sentiment that had already been expressed in terms too clear to be misinterpreted?

France and Great Britain were then waging deadly war against each other. In this mortal conflict, each sought to strengthen herself, or weaken her adversary by any influence to be acquired over foreign powers—by obtaining allies when allies were attainable, or securing neutrality where co-operation was not to be expected. The temper with which the American people contemplated this awful spectacle can not be forgotten. The war of our revolution, in which France fought by the side of America against Great Britain, was fresh in their recollection. Her unexamined professions of republicanism enlisted all their affections in her favour, and all their antipathies against the monarchs with whom she was contending. Feelings which were believed to be virtuous, and which certainly wore the imposing garb of patriotism, impelled them with almost irresistible force against that wise neutrality which the executive government had laboured to preserve, and had persisted in preserving with wonderful and unexampled firmness. France might, not unreasonably, indulge the hope that our government would be forced out of its neutral course, and be compelled to enter into the war as her ally. The letter to Mazzei could scarcely fail to encourage this hope.

France and Great Britain were at war with each other. In this deadly conflict, each nation aimed to strengthen itself or weaken its opponent by gaining influence over foreign powers—securing allies when possible or maintaining neutrality when cooperation seemed unlikely. The way the American people viewed this frightening situation is unforgettable. The Revolutionary War, where France fought alongside America against Great Britain, was still fresh in their minds. France's unexamined claims of republicanism won their affection and stirred their opposition against the monarchs she was fighting. Feelings believed to be virtuous, and which certainly had the appearance of patriotism, drove them with almost overwhelming force against the wise neutrality that the government had worked hard to maintain, with remarkable and unprecedented determination. France might reasonably hope that our government would be forced to abandon its neutral stance and become her ally in the war. The letter to Mazzei could hardly fail to boost this hope.

The suggestion had been repeatedly made, and France not only countenanced but acted on it, that the American people were ready to take part with her, and were with difficulty restrained by their government. That the government had fallen into the hands of an English party who were the more closely attached to their favourite nation, because they were unfriendly to republicanism, and sought to assimilate the government of the United States to that of England. Partiality to England was ingratitude to France. Monarchical propensities were of course anti-republican, and led to a system of policy separating the United States from republican France, and connecting them with her monarchical enemies.

The suggestion was made over and over, and France not only embraced it but acted on it, that the American people were ready to join her, and were being held back by their government. The government had fallen into the hands of a pro-English party that was more closely aligned with their favorite nation because they opposed republicanism and wanted to align the U.S. government with that of England. Favoring England was a betrayal of France. Monarchical tendencies were obviously anti-republican and resulted in a policy that separated the United States from republican France and tied them to her monarchical adversaries.

These sentiments were expressed in the interpolated sentence; and are intimated in terms perhaps more offensive, certainly not to be mistaken, in the letter as avowed.

These feelings were shown in the added sentence and are hinted at in terms that might be more offensive and definitely can't be misunderstood, in the letter as stated.

Review its language.

Please provide the text for review.

"In place of that noble love of liberty and republican government which carried us triumphantly through the War, an Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical party has sprung up, whose avowed object is to draw over us the substance as it has already done the forms of the British government."

"Instead of the noble love for freedom and democratic governance that saw us through the War, an Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratic group has emerged, whose stated goal is to impose the essence of British government on us, just as it has already done with its structures."

Could this party have been friendly—must it not have been hostile to France? It was not only monarchical and aristocratical,—it was Anglican also. Consequently it was anti-Gallican. But it did not comprehend the mass of the people. "The main body of our citizens, however," continues the letter, "remain true to their republican principles; the whole landed interest is republican, and so is a great mass of talents." Who then composed this odious Anglican, monarchical, aristocratical party? The letter informs us: "Against us are the executive, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all the officers of the government, all who want to be officers, all timid men who prefer the calm of despotism to the boisterous sea of liberty, British merchants and Americans trading on British capitals, speculators, and holders in the banks and public funds."

Could this party have been friendly—wasn't it actually hostile to France? It was not only monarchical and aristocratic, but also Anglican. So, it was anti-Gallican. However, it didn't represent the majority of the people. "The main body of our citizens, however," the letter continues, "still hold on to their republican principles; the entire landed interest is republican, and so is a large group of talented individuals." So who made up this detestable Anglican, monarchical, aristocratic party? The letter tells us: "Against us are the executive, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all the government officials, all those who want to be officials, all the timid people who prefer the peace of despotism to the turbulent sea of liberty, British merchants and Americans trading on British capital, speculators, and those with holdings in the banks and public funds."

The executive then and at least one other branch of the legislature were Anglican. The judiciary, a department not absolutely insignificant in a maritime war, was also Anglican. But the executive, being the organ of intercourse with foreign nations, is considered by them as essentially the government. This being thought Anglican, its course being such as to induce the writer to brand it with this odious epithet, ought it to excite surprise that an editor, the organ of the French government, made the strictures upon it which are quoted in the note? Are not those strictures as applicable to the letter now avowed as to the interpolated sentence?

The executive branch back then, along with at least one other part of the legislature, was Anglican. The judiciary, which plays a significant role in a maritime war, was also Anglican. However, since the executive is responsible for dealing with foreign nations, it's seen by others as essentially the government. Given that this was thought to be Anglican, and its actions led the writer to label it with this negative term, should we be surprised that an editor representing the French government made the criticisms mentioned in the note? Aren’t those criticisms just as relevant to the statement now admitted as they were to the added sentence?

The remark that the "French government had testified its resentment by breaking off communication with an ungrateful and faithless ally until she shall return to a more just and benevolent conduct," was the assertion of a fact which had taken place, and the commentary discloses its object not less plainly than did the time at which this fact was announced to the American government and people.[74] "It will give rise in the United States," says the editor, "to discussions which may afford a triumph to the party of good republicans, the friends of France."

The statement that the "French government had shown its anger by cutting off communication with an ungrateful and disloyal ally until they return to fairer and kinder behavior," was a confirmed fact. The commentary clearly reveals its purpose just as much as the timing of this fact's announcement to the American government and the public. [74] "This will lead to discussions in the United States," the editor states, "which could provide a win for the pro-French, good republican party."

The letter, without the aid of the interpolated sentence, could not fail to cherish this sentiment. It states explicitly an unequivocal division and a decided hostility between those who administered the government, and the great body of land holders, who, in this country, are the people. The first were Anglican and monarchical, the last were republican, and, in the language of the Moniteur, "the friends of France." What so certain to produce or continue the rupture of communication mentioned by the editor as the opinion that this statement was true? If we could doubt, our doubts are removed by the declaration that it would produce "discussions in the United States which may afford a triumph to the party of good republicans, the friends of France;" and by the declaration of Mr. Adet.

The letter, even without the added sentence, clearly expresses this sentiment. It explicitly states an undeniable divide and strong opposition between those in charge of the government and the majority of landowners, who represent the people in this country. The former were Anglican and royalist, while the latter were republican and, as the Moniteur put it, "the friends of France." What could be more likely to cause or sustain the breakdown in communication noted by the editor than the belief that this statement was true? If we had any doubts, they are dispelled by the claim that it would lead to "discussions in the United States that may benefit the party of true republicans, the friends of France," and by Mr. Adet's statement.

The interpolated sentence then does not vary the import of the letter, nor change the impression it made in France, and must make on the mind of the reader.

The added sentence doesn’t change the meaning of the letter, nor does it alter the impression it had in France, and it shouldn't affect the reader's understanding.

Were it otherwise, Mr. Jefferson should have directed his reproaches towards himself for the countenance his silent acquiescence gave to the opinion that the whole letter was genuine—not towards the great body of his countrymen who yielded implicit faith to this imposing testimony.

Were it different, Mr. Jefferson should have directed his criticisms towards himself for the support his silence gave to the belief that the entire letter was authentic—not towards the vast majority of his fellow citizens who placed complete trust in this powerful evidence.

Could such a letter from such a personage be entirely overlooked by the biographer of Washington? Having assumed the task of delineating the character, and detailing the actions and opinions of the great soldier and statesman of America, an essential part of which was to be looked for in the difficulties and the opposition he encountered and overcame, could a transaction which contains such strong intrinsic evidence of those difficulties and that opposition be passed over in total silence? These questions were revolved in his mind while engaged in this part of the work; and the result to which his judgment conducted him was a conviction that, though he might forbear to make those strictures on the letter which the relative situation of the writer and the individual so seriously criminated seemed to invite, his duty required him to notice it so far as it indicated the violence of party spirit at the time, the extreme to which it was carried, the dangers to which it led, and the difficulties which the wise and firm mind of Washington was doomed to encounter.

Could a letter from such a significant figure be completely ignored by Washington's biographer? Having taken on the job of portraying the character and detailing the actions and views of America's great soldier and statesman, it was essential to consider the challenges and opposition he faced and overcame. Could a situation that clearly shows those challenges and that opposition be overlooked completely? These questions occupied his mind while he worked on this part of the project; and the conclusion he reached was that, although he might hold back from making harsh comments about the letter due to the serious issues it raised regarding the writer and the individual, his responsibility required him to address it, as it reflected the intensity of party spirit at the time, how far it went, the dangers it posed, and the difficulties that the wise and steadfast mind of Washington had to confront.

The remarks of the French editor were quoted because they have a strong tendency, especially when connected with subsequent events, to explain the motives by which the Directory was actuated in its aggressions on the United States, and to justify the policy of the Washington administration. These remarks did not grow out of the interpolated sentence, nor were they confined to it. They apply to the whole letter. That sentence is not cited, nor is any particular allusion made to it, in the note which is charged with "exaggerating, recording, and sanctioning the forgery." How then could Mr. Jefferson deliberately make the charge?

The comments from the French editor were cited because they strongly indicate, especially when linked to later events, the motivations behind the Directory's actions against the United States and support the policy of the Washington administration. These comments didn’t originate from the added sentence, nor were they limited to it. They pertain to the entire letter. That sentence isn’t mentioned, nor is there any specific reference to it, in the note that is accused of "exaggerating, recording, and sanctioning the forgery." So how could Mr. Jefferson intentionally make that accusation?

In the same letter he endeavours to convey the opinion that the harsh and injurious strictures made to Mazzei were not intended for General Washington, and that this distinguished individual never applied them to himself.

In the same letter, he tries to express the idea that the harsh and unfair criticisms directed at Mazzei were not meant for General Washington, and that this notable person never took them personally.

The evidence in support of this proposition is not derived from the person whose opinion Mr. Jefferson undertakes to state. The writer says,[75] "I do affirm that there never passed a word, written or verbal, directly or indirectly, between General Washington and myself on the subject of that letter." If his observations on this point are to be considered as reasoning rather than assertion, they may be freely examined.

The evidence supporting this idea doesn't come from the person whose opinion Mr. Jefferson claims to represent. The writer states,[75] "I affirm that there was never any word, written or spoken, directly or indirectly, between General Washington and me regarding that letter." If his comments on this point are viewed as reasoning instead of mere assertion, they can be openly analyzed.

At the head of the list of those composing the "Anglican, monarchical, aristocratical party," the letter places "the executive." "Against us are the executive, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all the officers of government, all who want to be officers," &c.

At the top of the list of those making up the "Anglican, monarchical, aristocratic party," the letter mentions "the executive." "Against us are the executive, the judiciary, two out of three branches of the legislature, all government officials, and everyone who wants to be an official," &c.

The letter speaks in the present tense, and the term "executive" can describe only the then actual President. Consequently, it designates General Washington as expressly as if he had been named.

The letter is written in the present tense, and the term "executive" refers specifically to the current President at that time. Therefore, it clearly identifies General Washington as if he had been named directly.

If this positive evidence could be strengthened by auxiliary proof, it is furnished by the same sentence. "All officers of government, all who want to be officers," are included in the enumeration of those composing the party opposed to "the main body of citizens who remained true to republican principles."

If this positive evidence could be supported by additional proof, it is provided by the same sentence. "All government officials, all who aspire to be officials," are included in the list of those who make up the party against "the majority of citizens who stayed loyal to republican principles."

By whom were these Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical officers selected? By General Washington. To him alone were they indebted for their appointments. To whom did those "who wanted to be officers" look for the gratification of their wishes? To the same person. Would every individual in search of office enlist himself in a party so odious to "the main body of our citizens," and "the whole landed interest," if he did not think the road leading directly to that which he sought?

By whom were these Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratic officials chosen? By General Washington. They owed their appointments solely to him. To whom did those "who wanted to be officials" turn to fulfill their desires? To the same person. Would anyone looking for a position join a party so disliked by "the majority of our citizens" and "the entire landed interest" if they didn’t believe it was the direct path to what they wanted?

As if willing to keep out of view what can not be explained away, Mr. Jefferson turns our attention to other passages supposed to be more equivocal. He insists[76] that the letter saying "that two out of the three branches of the legislature were against us, was an obvious exception of him; it being well known that the majorities in the two branches of the senate and representatives were the very instruments which carried, in opposition to the old and real republicans, the measures which were the subjects of condemnation in this letter."

As if trying to hide what can't be justified, Mr. Jefferson shifts our focus to other passages that are thought to be more ambiguous. He insists[76] that the letter stating "that two out of the three branches of the legislature were against us" clearly excludes him; it is well known that the majorities in the two branches of the Senate and House of Representatives were the very forces that pushed through, against the old and true republicans, the measures that were condemned in this letter.

But did these measures obtain the force of laws by the mere act of the senate and house of representatives? Did not the President assent to them? If he did, how could the expression "two out of three branches of the legislature" be an obvious exception of him? But the letter speaks of the then existing legislature. "Against us are two out of three branches of the legislature." The fact is notorious that the house of representatives was, at the date of the letter, opposed to the administration. Mr. Jefferson himself gives us this information. In September, 1795,[77] he terms the effort to carry the treaty with Great Britain into effect, "an attempt of a party who find they have lost their majority in one branch of the legislature to make a law by the aid of the other branch and the executive under colour of a treaty," &c. Mr. Jefferson then has deprived himself of this explanation. He could not have intended to exclude the President by the phrase "two out of three branches of the legislature."

But did these measures become law just by the actions of the Senate and House of Representatives? Didn’t the President agree to them? If he did, how could the phrase "two out of three branches of the legislature" clearly exclude him? But the letter mentions the legislature that was in place at the time. "Against us are two out of three branches of the legislature." It’s well-known that the House of Representatives was opposed to the administration when the letter was written. Mr. Jefferson himself shares this information. In September 1795,[77] he described the effort to implement the treaty with Great Britain as "an attempt by a party who finds they have lost their majority in one branch of the legislature to make a law with the help of the other branch and the executive under the guise of a treaty," etc. Therefore, Mr. Jefferson has removed this explanation. He couldn’t have meant to exclude the President with the phrase "two out of three branches of the legislature."

The same letter contains also the following expression,[78] "Mr. Pickering quotes the passage in the letter of the men who were Samsons in the field and Solomons in the council, but who had their heads shorn by the harlot England." "Now this expression also was perfectly understood by General Washington. He knew that I meant it for the Cincinnati generally; and that from what had passed between us at the commencement of that institution, I could not mean to include him."

The same letter also includes the following statement,[78] "Mr. Pickering cites the portion in the letter about the men who were like Samsons in battle and Solomons in council, but who had their heads shaved by the corrupt England." "General Washington understood this expression perfectly. He knew I was referring to the Cincinnati as a whole; and that based on our discussions at the founding of that organization, I couldn’t possibly mean to include him."

In the letter to Mazzei these words obviously designate distinguished individuals, not whole classes of men, many of whom were unknown. "It would give you a fever were I to name to you the apostates who have gone over to these heresies; men who were Samsons in the field and Solomons in the council, but who have had their heads shorn by the harlot England."

In the letter to Mazzei, these words clearly refer to notable individuals, not entire groups of people, many of whom were unrecognizable. "You would be shocked if I were to name the apostates who have turned to these heresies; men who were strong like Samsons in the field and wise like Solomons in the council, but who have been weakened by the temptations of England."

In addition to this apparent allusion to individuals, it may be asked, could Mr. Jefferson mean to say that every officer engaged in the war of our revolution (for almost every one of them was a member of the Cincinnati) was an apostate who had gone over to the heresies he was describing? Could he mean to say that all those who had passed their prime of manhood in the field fighting the battles of American independence, and of republicanism against England, had become apostates from the cause to which their lives had been devoted, and the vile instruments of the power it was their pride and boast to have overthrown? That they were in a body following their ancient chief in a course directly opposite to that glorious career by which they had elevated their country to its high rank among the nations of the earth?

In addition to this obvious reference to individuals, one might ask, could Mr. Jefferson be suggesting that every officer involved in our revolutionary war (since nearly all of them were members of the Cincinnati) was a traitor who had defected to the heresies he described? Could he be implying that all those who spent their prime years fighting for American independence and republicanism against England had turned their backs on the cause they dedicated their lives to and become the corrupt agents of the power they took pride in overthrowing? That they were collectively following their former leader in a direction completely opposite to the glorious path that lifted their country to its esteemed position among the nations of the world?

There is other evidence that he could not have intended to fix this foul stigma on the officers of the revolution. They were far from being united in support of the administration. In Virginia certainly, a large number, perhaps a majority of the Cincinnati were opposed to it. Two[79] of them in congress at the time, and were among the most zealous supporters of Mr. Jefferson, and of that system of measures which he termed republican. The very letter under discussion contains an assertion incompatible with this construction of these terms. "The whole landed interest is republican." At the date of this letter there were few if any members of the Cincinnati in the south who were not also land holders. In the southern region generally, the army of our revolution was officered by land holders and their sons.

There is other evidence that he couldn't have meant to attach this negative label to the revolution's officers. They were far from united in their support of the administration. In Virginia, for sure, a significant number, maybe even a majority, of the Cincinnati were against it. Two[79] of them were in Congress at the time and were among the most passionate supporters of Mr. Jefferson and the set of policies he called republican. The very letter we’re discussing includes a statement that contradicts this interpretation of those terms. "The whole landed interest is republican." At the time this letter was written, there were few, if any, members of the Cincinnati in the South who weren't also landowners. Generally, in the southern region, the army of our revolution was led by landowners and their sons.

But if the writer of the letter could have intended to designate the members of the Cincinnati as "Samsons in the field," could he also have alluded to them as "Solomons in council?" Were the brave and hardy men who passed their youth, not in college, not in study, but under arms, suddenly converted, all of them, into "Solomons in council?" That some of them were entitled to this appellation is acknowledged with pride and pleasure, but as a class, it could not fit them. It is difficult to treat the proposition seriously.

But if the writer of the letter meant to refer to the members of the Cincinnati as "Samsons in the field," could he also have meant to call them "Solomons in council?" Were the brave and strong men who spent their youth, not in college or studying, but in military service, all of a sudden turned into "Solomons in council?" While it's true that some of them deserve this title, it's acknowledged with pride and pleasure, but as a whole, it just doesn't suit them. It's hard to take the idea seriously.

It is impossible for the intelligent reader to concur with Mr. Jefferson in the conclusion he draws from these premises, when he says,[80] "General Washington then understanding perfectly what and whom I meant to designate in both phrases, and that they could not have any application or view to himself, could find in neither any cause of offence to himself."

It is impossible for any smart reader to agree with Mr. Jefferson's conclusion based on these premises when he states,[80] "General Washington fully understood what I meant in both phrases, and that they had no relevance to him, so he could see no reason to take offense."

But were it otherwise, had Mr. Jefferson been as successful in the opinion of others as he would seem to be in his own, in proving that the phrases on which he reasons do not comprehend General Washington, what would be gained? Would it follow that the word "executive" did not mean the President, or that it excluded General Washington who was President when the letter was written, and had been President during the whole time while the laws were enacted, and the measures carried into execution, which he so harshly criminates? If the word "executive" must mean him, does it palliate the injury to be assured that the writer did not class him among "Samsons in the field" or "Solomons in council?"

But if things were different, and Mr. Jefferson had been as successful in others' opinions as he seems to be in his own at proving that the phrases he’s using don’t include General Washington, what would be the point? Would it mean that the word "executive" didn’t refer to the President, or that it excluded General Washington, who was President when the letter was written and had been during the entire time the laws were enacted and the measures put into action that he criticizes so harshly? If "executive" has to mean him, does it lessen the insult to know that the writer didn’t categorize him as one of the "Samsons in the field" or "Solomons in council?"

It is matter of some surprise to find a letter written so late as June, 1824, on the political paragraph contained in the letter to Mazzei, the following averment.[81] "In this information there was not one word which would not then have been or would not now be approved by every republican in the United States, looking back to those times."

It’s quite surprising to find a letter written as late as June 1824 discussing the political paragraph in the letter to Mazzei, which states the following.[81] "In this information, there was not a single word that wouldn’t have been approved by every republican in the United States during that time or wouldn’t be now."

In June, 1834, then, twenty-eight years after this extraordinary letter was written, and twenty-three years after its principal object had ceased to thwart the policy, or be an obstacle to the ambition of any man, Mr. Jefferson could deliberately, and on full consideration permit himself to make this assertion, and thus in effect to repeat the charge that General Washington belonged to an "Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratical party whose avowed object was to draw over us the substance as they had already done the forms of the British government,"—and this too while the venerated object of the charge was the chief magistrate of this great republic, acting under the obligation of a solemn oath "faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of his ability to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution!"

In June 1834, twenty-eight years after this remarkable letter was written and twenty-three years after its main focus had stopped interfering with the ambitions of any man, Mr. Jefferson could calmly and thoughtfully make this statement, effectively repeating the accusation that General Washington was part of an "Anglican, monarchical, and aristocratic party whose avowed goal was to bring us the substance just as they had already done with the forms of the British government,"—and this was said while the respected subject of the accusation was the president of this great republic, fulfilling the duty of a solemn oath "to faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and to the best of his ability to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution!"

This unpleasant subject is dismissed. If the grave be a sanctuary entitled to respect, many of the intelligent and estimable friends of Mr. Jefferson may perhaps regret that he neither respected it himself, nor recollected that it is a sanctuary from which poisoned arrows ought never to be shot at the dead or the living.

This uncomfortable topic is brushed aside. If the grave is a sacred place deserving of respect, many of Mr. Jefferson’s intelligent and admirable friends might lament that he did not respect it himself, nor remember that it is a refuge from which harmful attacks should never be launched at the dead or the living.


END OF VOLUME V.


FOOTNOTES

[1] The day on which the palace of the Tuilleries was stormed and the royal government subverted.

[1] The day the Tuileries Palace was attacked and the royal government was overthrown.

[2] With this letter were addressed two others to the ministers at London and Paris respectively, stating the interest taken by the President and people of the United States in the fate of the Marquis de Lafayette. This gentleman was declared a traitor by France, and was imprisoned by Prussia. The ministers of the United States were to avail themselves of every opportunity of sounding the way towards his liberation, which they were to endeavour to obtain by informal solicitations; but, if formal ones should be necessary, they were to watch the moment when they might be urged with the best prospect of success. This letter was written at the sole instance of the President.

[2] Along with this letter, there were two others addressed to the ministers in London and Paris, respectively, expressing the concern of the President and the people of the United States for the fate of the Marquis de Lafayette. This man had been declared a traitor by France and imprisoned by Prussia. The U.S. ministers were to take every chance to explore the options for his release, which they were to pursue through informal requests; however, if formal requests became necessary, they were to carefully choose the right moment when they could be made with the best chances of success. This letter was written at the direct request of the President.

[3] See note No. I. at the end of the volume.

[3] See note No. I. at the end of the volume.

[4] See note No. II. at the end of the volume.

[4] See note No. II. at the end of the volume.

[5] The regulation alluded to as was stated by Mr. Jefferson in reply, did not relate to vessels arming for defence, but to cruisers against the enemies of France.

[5] The regulation mentioned by Mr. Jefferson in his response wasn't about ships arming for defense, but rather about cruisers targeting France's enemies.

[6] They were particularly enumerated, and the decision was also extended to the ship Jane, an English armed merchantman, alleged by Mr. Genet to be a privateer, and the governor was requested to attend to her, and if he found her augmenting her force and about to depart, to cause her to be stopped.

[6] They were specifically listed, and the decision also applied to the ship Jane, an armed English merchant ship, which Mr. Genet claimed was a privateer. The governor was asked to keep an eye on her and, if he saw that she was enhancing her forces and getting ready to leave, to make sure she was stopped.

The Jane had augmented her armament by replacing four old gun-carriages with new ones, and opening two new portholes. The request of the British consul that these alterations might be allowed was peremptorily rejected, and directions were given that she should be restored precisely to the situation in which she entered the port. Had she attempted to sail without obeying these orders, Governor Mifflin had taken measures to stop her at Mud Island.

The Jane had upgraded her weaponry by swapping out four old gun carriages for new ones and adding two new portholes. The British consul's request for these changes to be permitted was firmly denied, and orders were given to return her exactly to the condition she was in when she arrived at the port. If she had tried to leave without following these orders, Governor Mifflin had plans in place to stop her at Mud Island.

[7] See note No. III. at the end of the volume.

[7] See note No. III. at the end of the volume.

[8] See note No. IV. at the end of the volume.

[8] See note No. IV. at the end of the book.

[9] See note No. V. at the end of the volume.

[9] See the note No. V. at the end of the volume.

[10] They received it from the secretaries of the treasury and of war.

[10] They got it from the secretaries of the treasury and of war.

[11] See note No. VI. at the end of the volume.

[11] See note No. VI. at the end of the volume.

[12] The state of affairs was so inauspicious to the continuance of peace that in a letter written in the month of June, to the secretary of war, the President thus expressed himself: "It is of great importance that this government should be fully informed of the Spanish force in the Floridas, the troops which have lately arrived, the number of their posts, and the strength and situation of each; together with such other circumstances as would enable it to adopt correspondent measures, in case we should, in spite of our endeavours to avoid it, get embroiled with that nation. It would be too improvident, might be too late, and certainly would be disgraceful, to have this information to obtain when our plans ought to be formed." After suggesting the propriety of making the proper inquiries in a particular channel, he added, "I point you to the above as one source only of information. My desire to obtain knowledge of these facts leads me to request with equal earnestness, that you would improve every other to ascertain them with certainty. No reasonable expense should be spared to accomplish objects of such magnitude in times so critical."

[12] The situation was so unfavorable for maintaining peace that in a letter written in June to the Secretary of War, the President stated: "It's very important for our government to be fully informed about the Spanish forces in Florida, including the troops that have recently arrived, the number of their posts, and the strength and location of each one; along with any other details that would help us take appropriate measures in case we get drawn into conflict with that nation, despite our efforts to avoid it. It would be reckless, potentially too late, and certainly embarrassing to gather this information when we should already be making plans." After suggesting that proper inquiries should be made through a specific channel, he added, "I mention this as just one source of information. My strong desire to learn these facts leads me to request, with equal urgency, that you explore every other avenue to verify them. No reasonable expense should be spared to achieve such crucial objectives in these critical times."

[13] See note No. VII. at the end of the volume.

[13] See note No. VII. at the end of the book.

[14] Resolutions had been offered for the creation of a small navy to be employed in the Mediterranean.

[14] Proposals had been made to establish a small navy to be used in the Mediterranean.

[15] In the course of this debate the resolutions were still considered as calculated to promote the interests, not of the United States, but of France. Mr. Ames said they had French stamped upon the very face of them. This expression produced a warm retort from Colonel Parker. He wished there was a stamp on the forehead of every person to designate whether he was for France or Britain. For himself he would not be silent and hear that nation abused to whom America was indebted for her rank as a nation. He was firmly persuaded that but for the aid of France in the last war, those gentlemen now on the floor who prided themselves in abusing her, would not have had an opportunity in that place of doing it. This sentiment produced a clap in the galleries. This indecorum was severely reprobated, and a motion was made to clear the galleries. Although the debate shows that the degree of sensibility excited by this disorder was extremely different in the different parties, it was justified by none, and the galleries were cleared.

[15] During this debate, the resolutions were still seen as benefiting not the United States, but France. Mr. Ames pointed out they had French written all over them. This comment drew a heated response from Colonel Parker. He wished everyone had a mark on their forehead to show whether they supported France or Britain. As for him, he wouldn’t stay quiet and listen to insults against the nation that helped America achieve its status as a country. He strongly believed that without France's support in the last war, those gentlemen currently speaking who take pride in criticizing her wouldn’t even have the chance to do so in this space. This statement got applause from the audience. This disruption was strongly condemned, and a motion was made to clear the audience. Although the level of outrage caused by this disturbance varied greatly among different groups, it was condemned by all, and the audience was cleared.

[16] A few days before the motions of Mr. Dayton and Mr. Clarke, a report was made by the secretary of state relative to the vexations of American commerce committed by the officers and cruisers of the belligerent powers. It was made from materials collected in an inquiry which had been instituted by the President before the meeting of congress. In this report, after detailing the numerous complaints which were made against Great Britain, the secretary proceeded to notice those which were brought against other nations. Against France, he said, it was urged that her privateers harassed the American trade no less than those of the British. That their courts of admiralty were guilty of equal oppression. That they had violated the treaty between the two nations. That a very detrimental embargo had detained a number of American vessels in her ports, and that the government had discharged a specie contract with assignats. The effect of this report seems to have been to excite a suspicion that the secretary of state was not sufficiently attached to liberty and to France.

[16] A few days before Mr. Dayton and Mr. Clarke filed their motions, the secretary of state submitted a report regarding the issues faced by American commerce due to the actions of the officers and cruisers from the warring powers. This report was based on information gathered from an investigation initiated by the President prior to Congress's meeting. In the report, after outlining the many complaints made against Great Britain, the secretary went on to address those directed at other countries. Regarding France, he noted that its privateers were troubling American trade just as much as the British were. He claimed that their admiralty courts were equally oppressive, that they violated the treaty between the two nations, that a damaging embargo had kept several American ships stuck in French ports, and that the government had settled a financial contract using assignats. The impact of this report seems to have sparked doubts about the secretary of state's loyalty to liberty and to France.

[17] A well known term designating the most violent party in France.

[17] A widely recognized term that refers to the most extreme faction in France.

[18] Previous to taking the question on this bill, a petition had been received against Mr. Gallatin, a senator from the state of Pennsylvania, who was determined not to have been a citizen a sufficient time to qualify him under the constitution for a seat in the senate. This casual circumstance divided the senate, or the bill would probably have been lost.

[18] Before discussing this bill, a petition was submitted against Mr. Gallatin, a senator from Pennsylvania, claiming he hadn't been a citizen long enough to meet the constitutional requirements for a senate seat. This minor issue split the senate, or the bill likely would have failed.

[19] A clause in the resolution as proposed, which was understood to imply that the act for incorporating the bank was unconstitutional, was previously struck out by the same majority.

[19] A part of the proposed resolution, which was seen as suggesting that the law to create the bank was unconstitutional, was taken out by the same majority.

[20] See note No. VIII. at the end of the volume.

[20] See note No. VIII. at the end of the book.

[21] The declaration was not unfrequently made that the people could only be roused to a proper attention to the violation of their rights, and to the prodigal waste of their money, by perceiving the weight of their taxes. This was concealed from them by the indirect, and would be disclosed to them by the direct, system of taxation.

[21] There was often a statement made that the public could only be fully aware of the violation of their rights and the reckless spending of their money if they saw the burden of their taxes. This was hidden from them by indirect taxation, but would be revealed through direct taxation.

[22] Two months previous to the passage of this resolution, the secretary of state had, by direction of the President, given the governor the most solemn assurances on this point.

[22] Two months before this resolution was passed, the Secretary of State, following the President's instructions, had provided the governor with the strongest assurances on this matter.

[23] Intercepted letters were laid before the President, showing that this expedition had been communicated to some members of the national convention and approved. It was stated that Mr. Genet, with the rank of major general, was to be Commander-in-chief of all forces raised on the American continent, and to direct their movements.

[23] Intercepted letters were presented to the President, revealing that this mission had been discussed with and approved by some members of the national convention. It was stated that Mr. Genet, holding the rank of major general, was to be the Commander-in-chief of all forces raised on the American continent and to oversee their movements.

[24] See note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

[24] See note No. IX. at the end of the volume.

[25] An evasive answer having been returned to the pacific overture made from the Au Glaize, General Wayne was uncertain whether the Indians had decided for peace or war.

[25] After receiving a vague response to the peaceful proposal from the Au Glaize, General Wayne wasn't sure if the Indians had chosen peace or war.

[26] The inspector had left the house and secreted himself. The demand of the papers was acceded to.

[26] The inspector had left the house and hidden himself away. The request for the documents was granted.

[27] This requisition was afterwards augmented to fifteen thousand.

[27] This request was later increased to fifteen thousand.

[28] The spirit of disaffection was rapidly spreading, and had it not been checked by this vigorous exertion of the powers of the government, it would be difficult to say what might have been its extent. Even while the militia were assembling, it broke out in more than one county in Pennsylvania, and showed itself in a part of Maryland.

[28] The feeling of resentment was spreading quickly, and if it hadn't been halted by the strong actions of the government, it's hard to say how far it might have gone. Even while the militia were gathering, it erupted in several counties in Pennsylvania and was evident in a section of Maryland.

[29] The impression, he said, made by this moderation on the discontented, did not correspond with what it deserved. The acts of delusion were no longer confined to the efforts of designing individuals. The very forbearance to press prosecutions was misinterpreted into a fear of urging the execution of the laws, and associations of men began to denounce threats against the officers employed. From a belief that by a more formal concert their operations might be defeated, certain self-created societies assumed the tone of condemnation.

[29] He noted that the impression this restraint left on the dissatisfied didn’t match what it really deserved. The acts of deception were no longer just the work of scheming individuals. The mere reluctance to pursue legal action was mistaken for a fear of enforcing the laws, and groups of people started to make threats against the officers involved. Believing that a more organized effort could undermine their operations, some self-appointed societies took on a tone of condemnation.

[30] The apprehensions entertained by the opposition that Colonel Hamilton would be appointed on the embassy to England were extreme. Among the letters to General Washington, are some from members of each branch of the legislature, advising against the mission generally, and dissuading him from the appointment of Colonel Hamilton particularly, in terms which manifest a real opinion that the best interests of the nation would be sacrificed by such an appointment. Colonel Hamilton himself recommended Mr. Jay.

[30] The concerns expressed by the opposition about Colonel Hamilton potentially being appointed to the embassy in England were intense. Among the letters to General Washington, there are some from members of both houses of the legislature, advising against the mission as a whole and strongly discouraging him from choosing Colonel Hamilton for the role, with language reflecting a genuine belief that such an appointment would harm the nation's best interests. Colonel Hamilton himself suggested Mr. Jay.

[31] See note No. X. at the end of the volume.

[31] See note No. X. at the end of the volume.

[32] In a private letter to the President, of the same date with the signature of the treaty, Mr. Jay said "to do more was impossible. I ought not to conceal from you, that the confidence reposed in your personal character was visible and useful throughout the negotiation.

[32] In a private letter to the President, dated the same day as the treaty's signature, Mr. Jay said, "to do more was impossible. I shouldn't hide from you that the trust placed in your personal character was clear and beneficial throughout the negotiation.

"If there is not a good disposition in the far greater part of the cabinet and nation towards us, I am exceedingly mistaken. I do not mean an ostensible and temporizing, but a real good disposition.—I wish it may have a fair trial."

"If there isn't a positive attitude among the majority of the cabinet and the nation towards us, I am highly mistaken. I'm not talking about a superficial or temporary goodwill, but genuine support. I hope it gets a fair chance."

[33] See note No. XI. at the end of the volume.

[33] See note No. XI. at the end of the volume.

[34] The chamber of commerce in New York had voted resolutions expressing their approbation of the treaty.

[34] The New York chamber of commerce had passed resolutions showing their approval of the treaty.

[35] Previous to the reception of the account of this order, the opinion of the secretary had been in favour of ratifying the treaty.

[35] Before receiving the news about this order, the secretary had been in favor of approving the treaty.

[36] See the Aurora from August to December, 1795. See, in particular, a series of essays, signed "A Calm Observer," published from the 23d of October to the 5th of November, 1795.

[36] Check out the Aurora from August to December 1795. Look for a series of essays by "A Calm Observer," published between October 23 and November 5, 1795.

[37] Gazette of the United States, 16th November, 1795.

[37] Gazette of the United States, November 16, 1795.

[38] See note No. XII. at the end of the volume.

[38] See note No. XII. at the end of the volume.

[39] See note No. XIII. at the end of the volume.

[39] See note No. XIII. at the end of the volume.

[40] Subsequent to the mission of Mr. Adet, but previous to this time, the revolutionary government which succeeded the abolition of monarchy had yielded to the constitution of the republican form.

[40] After Mr. Adet's mission, but before now, the revolutionary government that followed the end of the monarchy had adopted a republican constitution.

[41] The words of the oath of office prescribed for the chief magistrate.

[41] The words of the oath of office required for the chief magistrate.

[42] Mr. James Marshall.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Mr. James Marshall.

[43] In the same letter Mr. Jefferson had stated his total abstraction from party questions.

[43] In the same letter, Mr. Jefferson expressed that he was completely detached from party issues.

[44] See note No. XIV. at the end of the volume.

[44] See note No. XIV. at the end of the volume.

[45] See Monroe's View.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ See Monroe's Perspective.

[46] At his own request, Mr. Pinckney had been recalled; and Mr. King, a gentleman whose talents have been universally acknowledged, and whose services will be long recollected with approbation, had succeeded him.

[46] At his own request, Mr. Pinckney was recalled, and Mr. King, a man whose skills are widely recognized and whose contributions will be remembered with appreciation for a long time, took his place.

[47] The constitutional power of congress to appropriate money to objects of the description here recommended was denied by the opposition.

[47] The constitutional authority of Congress to allocate funds for the purposes suggested here was rejected by the opposition.

[48] Some objection has been made to the accuracy of this speech, as reported in the Daily Advertiser. The author has therefore deemed it proper to make some extracts from the Aurora, the leading paper of that party, of which Mr. Giles was a conspicuous member.

[48] Some people have questioned the accuracy of this speech as it was reported in the Daily Advertiser. The author has decided to include some excerpts from the Aurora, the main newspaper of that party, where Mr. Giles was a prominent member.

Mr. Giles, after stating that "the want of wisdom and firmness" in the administration, "had conducted the affairs of the nation to a crisis which threatens greater calamities than any that has before occurred,"—remarks as follows:—"Another sentiment in the report he could not agree to. He did not regret the President's retiring from office. He hoped he would retire, and enjoy the happiness that awaited him in retirement. He believed it would more conduce to that happiness that he should retire than if he should remain in office. He believed the government of the United States, founded on the broad basis of the people, that they were competent to their own government, and the remaining of no man in office was necessary to the success of that government. The people would truly be in a calamitous situation, if one man were essential to the existence of the government. He was convinced that the United States produces a thousand citizens capable of filling the presidential chair, and he would trust to the discernment of the people for a proper choice. Though the voice of all America should declare the President's retiring as a calamity, he could not join in the declaration, because he did not conceive it a misfortune. He hoped the President would be happy in his retirement, and he hoped he would retire." He reverted again to that part of the report which declared the administration to have been wise and firm in its measures. "He had always disapproved," he repeated, "of the measures of that administration with respect to foreign relations, and many members of the house had also; he was therefore surprised that gentlemen should now come forward and wish him, in one breath, to disavow all his former opinions, without being previously convinced of having been in an error. For his own part, he conceived there was more cause than ever for adhering to his old opinion. The course of events had pointed out their propriety; and, if he was not much mistaken, a crisis was at hand which would confirm them. He wished, that while gentlemen were willing to compliment the President, they would have some respect for the feelings of others."—Aurora, December 15th, 1796.

Mr. Giles, after stating that "the lack of wisdom and strength" in the administration "had driven the nation's affairs to a crisis that threatens greater disasters than any that has come before," remarks as follows: "There is another point in the report that I cannot agree with. I do not regret the President stepping down from office. I hope he will retire and find the happiness that awaits him in retirement. I believe that it will contribute to that happiness if he retires rather than remains in office. I believe that the government of the United States, based on the broad foundation of the people, shows that they are capable of governing themselves, and that no individual is necessary for the success of that government. The people would truly be in a desperate situation if one person were essential for the government’s existence. I am convinced that the United States has a thousand citizens capable of filling the presidential role, and I will trust the judgment of the people for making a suitable choice. Even if the entire nation declared the President stepping down as a disaster, I could not agree with that statement because I do not see it as a misfortune. I hope the President finds happiness in his retirement, and I hope he chooses to retire." He returned again to that part of the report which claimed the administration had been wise and firm in its actions. "I have always disagreed," he reiterated, "with that administration's actions regarding foreign relations, and many members of the house have as well; so I was surprised that gentlemen would now come forward and expect me, in one breath, to reject all my previous opinions without having convincing proof that I was wrong. For my part, I think there is more reason than ever to stick to my original opinion. The events that have unfolded have shown their appropriateness; and, if I’m not mistaken, a crisis is approaching that will confirm them. I wish that while gentlemen are willing to compliment the President, they would also respect the feelings of others."—Aurora, December 15th, 1796.

[49] Dunlap and Claypole's Daily Advertiser, December 16th, 1796.

[49] Dunlap and Claypole's Daily Advertiser, December 16, 1796.

[50] See note No. XV. at the end of the volume.

[50] Check the note No. XV. at the end of the volume.

[51] See note No. XVI. at the end of the volume.

[51] See note No. XVI. at the end of the volume.

[52] See note No. XVII. at the end of the volume.

[52] See note No. XVII. at the end of the book.

[53] Two of them were of the party denominated federal; the third was arranged with the opposition.

[53] Two of them were from the federal party; the third was aligned with the opposition.

[54] It is a remarkable fact, that the answer of the French minister to this letter, an answer which criminated the American government in bitter terms, was in the possession of a printer in Philadelphia who had uniformly supported the pretensions of that republic, before it reached the American government.

[54] It’s astonishing that the French minister’s reply to this letter, which harshly criticized the American government, was in the hands of a printer in Philadelphia who had consistently backed the claims of that republic, before it even reached the American government.

[55] Having heard that the President contemplated a tour as far south as the district of Columbia, General Washington invited him to Mount Vernon, and concluded his letter with saying: "I pray you to believe that no one has read the various approbatory addresses which have been presented to you with more heartfelt satisfaction than I have done, nor are there any who more sincerely wish that your administration of the government may be easy, happy and honourable to yourself, and prosperous to the country."

[55] After hearing that the President was considering a trip down to the District of Columbia, General Washington invited him to Mount Vernon and ended his letter by saying: "I hope you know that no one has read the different congratulatory messages given to you with more genuine happiness than I have, and there’s no one who wishes more sincerely for your government to be easy, fulfilling, and honorable for you, and successful for the country."

[56] See note No. XVIII. at the end of the volume.

[56] See note No. XVIII. at the end of the volume.

[57] The following is the list of generals, and of the military staff.

[57] Here’s the list of generals and the military staff.

Alexander Hamilton, Inspector.
Charles C. Pinckney, }  
Henry Knox, or, if either refuses } Major Generals.
Henry Lee. }  
     
Henry Lee (if not Major General) }  
John Brooks, }  
William S. Smith, or } Brigadiers.
John E. Howard. }  
     
Edward Hand, or }  
Jonathan Dayton, or } Adjutant General.
William S. Smith. }  
Edward Carrington, Quarter Master General.
James Craik, Director of the Hospital.

[58] These resolutions were prepared by General Lee, who happening not to be in his place when the melancholy intelligence was received and first mentioned in the house, placed them in the hands of the member who moved them.

[58] These resolutions were drafted by General Lee, who, not being present when the sad news was shared for the first time in the house, gave them to the member who introduced them.

[59] Vol. iv. p. 402.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 402.

[60] April, 1796.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ April 1796.

[61] Vol. iii. p. 313.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 313.

[62] Holland, it will be remembered, had been conquered by Pichegru.

[62] It's worth noting that Holland had been conquered by Pichegru.

[63] Vol. iii. p. 316.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 316.

[64] Vol. iii. p. 317.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 317.

[65] Vol. iii. p. 319.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 319.

[66] Vol. iii. p. 323.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 323.

[67] Vol. iii. p. 324.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 324.

[68] Vol. iii. p. 328.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3 p. 328.

[69] Vol. iii. p. 347.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 347.

[70] Vol. iii. p. 347

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 347

[71] Vol. iii. p. 418.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 418.

[72] Vol. iv. p. 402.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 402.

[73] Vol. iii. p. 327.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 327.

[74] It was announced by Mr. Adet in the crisis of the first contest for the Presidency between Mr. Adams and Mr. Jefferson.

[74] It was announced by Mr. Adet during the crisis of the first presidential contest between Mr. Adams and Mr. Jefferson.

[75] Vol. iv. p. 401.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 401.

[76] Vol. iv. p. 405.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 405.

[77] Vol. iii. p. 316.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 3, p. 316.

[78] Vol. iv. p. 404.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 404.

[79] Colonels Cabell and Par.

Colonels Cabell and Par.

[80] Vol. iv. p. 406.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 406.

[81] Vol. iv. p. 402.

__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Vol. 4, p. 402.




        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!